Speaker 1: All right, News round up in Information Overload Hour this Friday,
Speaker 1: eight hundred and ninety four to one, Sean if you
Speaker 1: want to be a part of the program. A complaint
Speaker 1: has been filed against the Shawnee Mission School District. This
Speaker 1: is in Kansas, over gender identity policies. I've said this
Speaker 1: many times when I started in radio, oh many many
Speaker 1: decades ago. There's so many different issues I never thought
Speaker 1: I'd be dealing with talking about ever, But here we
Speaker 1: go again. Now. The Southeastern Legal Foundation and the Defense
Speaker 1: Freedom Institute for Policy Students submitted the complaint to the
Speaker 1: US Department of Education, and the organization says that the
Speaker 1: complaint was filed on behalf of Kansas parents and their
Speaker 1: elementary age daughter, and the filing challenges district policies that
Speaker 1: quote allows students to access sex separated facilities based on
Speaker 1: gender identity. Let's put it another way. That means that
Speaker 1: by biological boys can go into girls' locker rooms. It
Speaker 1: also requires students and staff to use preferred names and pronouns.
Speaker 1: We are they going to ask for parental approval? I mean,
Speaker 1: you know, the parents are not potted plans. They actually
Speaker 1: should have a say in important matters involving their own
Speaker 1: children anyway. According to the complaint, a first grade girl
Speaker 1: encountered a biological man who identifies as a woman in
Speaker 1: the girl's restroom. The experience apparently allegedly caused significant emotional
Speaker 1: distress the student that has since been displaced from the
Speaker 1: girl's restroom and required to use a separate staff bathroom.
Speaker 1: District officials told parents that providing restroom access based on
Speaker 1: gender identity and compelling the use of preferred pronouns are
Speaker 1: required under Title nine. However, the organization argues that the
Speaker 1: federal courts have rejected that interpretation. The Department of Education
Speaker 1: has reaffirmed the Title nine protects students based on biological
Speaker 1: sec not gender identity. This is where you know. This
Speaker 1: was a battle to help women compete on the same
Speaker 1: plane and the same rules as men in collegiate sports.
Speaker 1: It's not that difficult anyway. Kim Herman is with US
Speaker 1: top constitutional lawyer, president of the Southeastern Legal Foundation, is
Speaker 1: here to explain the announcement from President Trump's Department of Education,
Speaker 1: which declared that Kansas's Shawnee Mission School districts gender identity
Speaker 1: policies don't comply with federal law. I thought we were
Speaker 1: past this, but I guess people just keep pushing the limit.
Speaker 1: They won't let it go. Kimberly, welcome on the program.
Speaker 2: Yeah, thanks for having me, Sean. I mean, just like
Speaker 2: you said, unfortunately, some of these schools, even those in
Speaker 2: our heartland, will not let this concept of gender identity go.
Speaker 2: And even after the Department of Education agreed with us
Speaker 2: and said yes, forcing these young girls to share bathrooms,
Speaker 2: to share locker rooms with boys who think that they're girls,
Speaker 2: forcing them to use incorrect pronouns violates Title nine, the
Speaker 2: school district is still digging in and saying, fine, we
Speaker 2: won't do it for now, but if a court can
Speaker 2: says otherwise, or if we believe that the losses otherwise,
Speaker 2: we're going to go right back to doing this. It's
Speaker 2: really shocking how dug in some of these schools are
Speaker 2: to violate our girls' privacy rights.
Speaker 1: You know, I really have a hard time understanding where
Speaker 1: this all came from. I have a hard time understanding.
Speaker 1: And I guess talking so often to Riley Gains and
Speaker 1: all that she went through and so many other athletes
Speaker 1: have gone through, and the purpose of Title nine to
Speaker 1: begin with, and I'm just trying to understand why there
Speaker 1: are so many people that keep pushing and pushing and
Speaker 1: pushing this idea. Well, I identify as and now everybody's
Speaker 1: got to accommodate their quote identification and then accommodate and
Speaker 1: allow biological men in many instances, into women's locker rooms
Speaker 1: or in grade school boys into girls' locker rooms, and
Speaker 1: that they and assume that that teachers must, you know,
Speaker 1: at the command of a student, address kids based on
Speaker 1: their preferred pronoun. I mean when I first heard about this,
Speaker 1: a friend of mine's a kid went to Brown University.
Speaker 1: In the first day on campus, they'd walk around I
Speaker 1: guess the courtyard, and they'd walk around and ask the
Speaker 1: person that they'd meet, whoever it happened to be, what
Speaker 1: is your preferred pronoun? I'm like, huh, what are you
Speaker 1: talking about? Had no idea that we'd be this deep
Speaker 1: in the weeds this many years later.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I mean, it really honestly stems for mental illness,
Speaker 2: and it stems from these schools and even our colleges
Speaker 2: wanting to take over our kids. Right. It's the idea
Speaker 2: of displacing the parents and saying that they are not
Speaker 2: our children as parents, but they are their children, they're
Speaker 2: the government's children. You know. We've been fortunate enough to
Speaker 2: also represent Riley Gains in several lawsuits, including ones where
Speaker 2: these colleges are not even allowing her to come and
Speaker 2: speak her truth right and come and say that Title
Speaker 2: nine is alive and well, that boys should not be
Speaker 2: in competing in girls' sports, that she should have never
Speaker 2: been forced to change in front of boys in locker rooms,
Speaker 2: and they wouldn't even let her speak and say that
Speaker 2: on campus. They said that it was discriminatory. Now we
Speaker 2: were successful in that, but it just goes to show
Speaker 2: that they know that there's something wrong with this. They
Speaker 2: know that they should not be allowing boys in these spaces,
Speaker 2: and they know that these children they are ares as parents,
Speaker 2: and that's why they're trying to silence everyone from even
Speaker 2: speaking about this on campuses across our country.
Speaker 1: You know, I got to tell you something. It really
Speaker 1: is mind numbing to me. I mean, Riley Gaines people
Speaker 1: don't quite understand. I mean, she's been in so many
Speaker 1: hostile environments just by showing up on college campuses. This
Speaker 1: kind of always impressed me about Charlie Kirk is that
Speaker 1: you know, ask me anything, and he'd get in front
Speaker 1: of a hostile crowd and he'd tear these people apart
Speaker 1: because he was prepared to answer any question and he
Speaker 1: would shatter their illusions and their myths. So he was
Speaker 1: a great iconoclast in that way. And you know, but
Speaker 1: it becomes dangerous. He's been in many situations where it's
Speaker 1: become dangerous.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I mean in the colleges, they really rally the
Speaker 2: students to do that, right, because they say that if
Speaker 2: you want to say anything that is conservative leaning, if
Speaker 2: you want to speak truth, if you want to even
Speaker 2: just say what the law is in this situation, that
Speaker 2: you are discriminating and you are harassing and you are bullying.
Speaker 2: And so they're creating that environment on campuses that really
Speaker 2: is truly very dangerous, as we sadly saw last year,
Speaker 2: and that's trickling down to K through twelve. Right, our
Speaker 2: client's first grade student is being shamed for not wanting
Speaker 2: to share a bathroom stall next to a boy all
Speaker 2: so going to the bathroom. I mean, she's being told
Speaker 2: that this is wrong, that she should feel differently, and
Speaker 2: that if she wants privacy, she has to miss class
Speaker 2: and go all the way across campus to go to
Speaker 2: another bathroom. I mean, I have a third grade daughter,
Speaker 2: I have a sixth grade son. They would be mortified
Speaker 2: to have to use the bathroom with somebody from the
Speaker 2: opposite Sexit school, right, I mean, this is just common sense.
Speaker 1: It's unfortunately common sense is not so common. But thank goodness,
Speaker 1: there are people like you, Southeastern Legal that are out
Speaker 1: there fighting it every day. Kimberly Herman. We appreciate the update,
Speaker 1: appreciate your time, Thank you for being.
Speaker 2: Will us absolutely thanks Sean.
Speaker 1: Eight hundred nine four one. Sean, if you want to
Speaker 1: be a part of the program, let us go to
Speaker 1: our busy phones and let's say hi to Macy in
Speaker 1: New Jersey. Macy, how are you happy Friday? Glad you
Speaker 1: called hi?
Speaker 3: Thanks so much. I really appreciate it. So I always
Speaker 3: wanted to make some point. We're talking about the NFL
Speaker 3: and the franchises and the streaming services, and excuse me
Speaker 3: how expensive everything is. And my question is, how come
Speaker 3: there's commercials on cable TV when you're already paying a
Speaker 3: lot of money a month to have that service.
Speaker 1: I don't know the answer. I mean, the bottom line
Speaker 1: is is if you have a product that people want
Speaker 1: and they're willing to pay for it. It's simple supply
Speaker 1: and demand criss crosses and dictates the price. The issue
Speaker 1: legally is the anti trust provision that benefits the NFL, Like,
Speaker 1: for example, there was a lot of complaints. I saw
Speaker 1: an article on OutKick today that last night's NFL draft,
Speaker 1: for example, and people love to watch the draft. My
Speaker 1: son is probably the number one guy that knows more
Speaker 1: about the football than anybody I know. He's telling me
Speaker 1: all about it. The only thing is they can't have
Speaker 1: it both ways the NFL. As far as I'm concerned,
Speaker 1: if there is an appetite for people to buy these
Speaker 1: streaming services because they want to watch their their their team,
Speaker 1: their game, then they're going to buy it. So, you know,
Speaker 1: I think everyone's going to decide for themselves in the end.
Speaker 1: But anyway, the article now kick was saying how how
Speaker 1: far behind the actual draft it was on live television,
Speaker 1: Like they were two or three picks behind according to
Speaker 1: that article. I didn't pick up on that. My son
Speaker 1: didn't tell me that.
Speaker 3: But my point is more, why are we paying for,
Speaker 3: you know, to have cable TV. We're still getting commercials.
Speaker 3: I think we're getting you know, I think if you're
Speaker 3: paying for TV, I don't think there should be commercials.
Speaker 3: I mean, you pay for serious ExM, but there's no
Speaker 3: commercials on serious xms.
Speaker 1: Well, there're actually are commercials on serious XM. I'm just
Speaker 1: going to be honest with you, not as many. And
Speaker 1: and that was one of the appeals of it when
Speaker 1: it first launched. Launched. Look, I mean, it's very expensive
Speaker 1: to keep the lights on to do programming, and it
Speaker 1: goes way beyond paying whatever on air talent you may
Speaker 1: have to have. But the mccount the technical side of it,
Speaker 1: everything in between. The power bill of a fifty thousand
Speaker 1: want Clear Channel AM station is enormous. The towers are
Speaker 1: very costly, the land is very costly. Then and at
Speaker 1: the end of the day, all of these businesses are
Speaker 1: trying to recoup their money and make a profit. So
Speaker 1: there is a business aspect to all of it. There's
Speaker 1: a business aspect to sports, but at the end of
Speaker 1: the day, it's going to be supplying to man. It
Speaker 1: really is. And if there's not a single show really
Speaker 1: that you can watch today that doesn't have some commercial
Speaker 1: aspect to it, you know, like for example, we have
Speaker 1: the new podcast hanging out with me. I hope people
Speaker 1: will watch it. You can see it on YouTube and
Speaker 1: you know, other venues as well, but it's just very
Speaker 1: limited in terms of it's the number of commercials that
Speaker 1: you have in that space, and I know that's appealing.
Speaker 1: It's also long form where radio and TV are a
Speaker 1: much quicker, faster. It's a greater pace, and I like
Speaker 1: to just slow it down and let people talk more
Speaker 1: and have more of a conversation. So it adds. It
Speaker 1: just kind of scratches a niche that I have, and
Speaker 1: I love doing it, and I'd be talking to myself
Speaker 1: anyway if I'm not. If I wasn't doing the podcast.
Speaker 1: In between radio and TV, what I do is very simple.
Speaker 1: I'm on the phone talking anyway. I don't stop talking.
Speaker 1: I can't help myself, except if I'm listening to people,
Speaker 1: becoming a better listener, working hard on anyway. I appreciate
Speaker 1: the call. MA see God bless you have a great weekend.
Speaker 3: Okay, thanks, take care.
Speaker 1: All right, thre busy Phones This Friday, eight hundred and
Speaker 1: nine to four one Seawan John Pennsylvania Next Sean Hennity Show.
Speaker 1: What's up John, Sean, You're the baby you're the boy.
Speaker 1: What's going on?
Speaker 4: Hey, he I just want to throw out an idea
Speaker 4: about the tune and fiftieth anniversary of America. But real quick,
Speaker 4: if you can answer this, I'm just wondering, did the
Speaker 4: Pope ever say anything in December or January? Did he
Speaker 4: criticize the Iranian leadership for slaughtering thousands of their citizens.
Speaker 1: No, he's been very very quiet on all of that.
Speaker 1: My criticism is I wish the Pope had the moral
Speaker 1: clarity to understand radical Islamis, and I don't think he
Speaker 1: does understand it. I don't think he's a bad person.
Speaker 1: I'm a little bit hesitant to read into his relationship
Speaker 1: with JB. Pritzker or David Axelrod. These are people that
Speaker 1: take very different positions on the issue of life, which
Speaker 1: the Catholic Church is very passionate about, and yet he's
Speaker 1: meeting with them, and he was specifically going after the president. Now,
Speaker 1: with all that said, the Pope said he's done. He
Speaker 1: was not specifically trying to start a fight with Donald Trump.
Speaker 1: But I do believe that we need moral clarity from
Speaker 1: religious leaders and radical Islamic terrorists that are the number
Speaker 1: one state sponsored terror there should be no moral ambiguity
Speaker 1: in my mind.
Speaker 5: So I'm going to jump in because the Pope yesterday
Speaker 5: and you know, I'm no fan of the Pope, said
Speaker 5: that he condemns what has happened with hardline Iranian regime tactics,
Speaker 5: the taking of people's lives, and while he does not
Speaker 5: support the war, he is against the way that the
Speaker 5: Iran IRGC leaders have killed thousands of people, and that
Speaker 5: he is very upset about the loss of life of
Speaker 5: innocent lives.
Speaker 1: So that was yesterday hear that, But in the beginning
Speaker 1: he had said that God is against all contents.
Speaker 5: One hundred percent. He's completely out of his.
Speaker 1: Mind my issue, and people got very angry with me.
Speaker 1: And I said so many good things about the Catholic
Speaker 1: Church and how influential it's been in my life in
Speaker 1: a positive way. But if you look at if you
Speaker 1: believe that the God of the Old Testament and the
Speaker 1: God of the New Testament is the same God today
Speaker 1: that God in the Old Testament, over four hundred separate occasions,
Speaker 1: you know, put his seal of approval and even outright
Speaker 1: ordered conflict in war and blessed those that he believed
Speaker 1: were righteous. Well, I'm not believed those that were righteous.
Speaker 1: So I'm not looking to get into a battle with
Speaker 1: the Pope. I just want I actually, I'm very, very
Speaker 1: tolerant of people's religious faith. However, radical islamis that believe,
Speaker 1: convert or die, that support terrorism. There's no It is
Speaker 1: completely at odds with Western civilization and with the belief
Speaker 1: in life that I know the Pope stands for. Anyway,
Speaker 1: I do hope that answers your question. You appreciate you
Speaker 1: being with us. Quick break right back. More your calls
Speaker 1: coming up eight hundred and ninety four one Shaw on
Speaker 1: this Friday if you want to be a part of
Speaker 1: the program. As we continue, all right, let me play
Speaker 1: Hassan Piker. Linda's mad that I'm thinking about putting him
Speaker 1: on my podcast, but listen to him.
Speaker 6: Social Murder and Brian Thompson as the United Healthcare CEO
Speaker 6: was engaging in a tremendous amount of social murder because
Speaker 6: of the pervasive pain that the private healthcare system had
Speaker 6: created for the average American. I saw so many people
Speaker 6: immediately understand why this death had taken place. That is
Speaker 6: the reason why I think the reaction to Luigi Mangioni,
Speaker 6: especially by younger generations was not so negative.
Speaker 1: All right, So he's kind of cloaking this, and it
Speaker 1: sounds like a rationalization for those that support Luigi Mangioni
Speaker 1: and Linda's head is about to explode, controlling her in
Speaker 1: this segment, it has exploded.
Speaker 5: We need a cleanup in Ile five, Okay.
Speaker 1: He is a left wing Twitch streamer. He's a commentator
Speaker 1: known for being this hardcore, you know, pro Palestine, radical
Speaker 1: leftist America deserved nine to eleven. He made that comment
Speaker 1: the October seventh terrorist attack against Israel a direct consequence
Speaker 1: of Israeli US actions. Doesn't matter if he happened on
Speaker 1: October seventh, It doesn't change the dynamic for me. Then
Speaker 1: he later clarified it doesn't deny sexual violence occurred, but
Speaker 1: argues it doesn't justify what he calls Israeli genocide. He
Speaker 1: makes an excuse for everything he called ultra orthodox Jews.
Speaker 1: Quote in Bread, he used the term bloodthirsty, violent pig
Speaker 1: directed at an anti Hama's viewer. Critic compares liberal Zionist
Speaker 1: to liberal Nazi. I mean you wanted to keep going,
Speaker 1: suggested Republicans should kill Rick Scott over Medicare. His more
Speaker 1: recent comments. You know that we just played for you here,
Speaker 1: and you're I've thought about it. You know. There were
Speaker 1: many reasons not to interview him and not to platform
Speaker 1: this guy. And I don't even want to argue with
Speaker 1: the guy. I have nothing to argue about. I want
Speaker 1: him to talk and let me. Now you're ready to
Speaker 1: hear my answer? Do you want to respond for me?
Speaker 5: Give me your answer?
Speaker 1: Okay? Look at the prominent Democrats that have either collaborated
Speaker 1: or sought his platform. Bernie Sanders praised him, Revolution and
Speaker 1: Media thanked him. AOC hosted live stream conversations with him.
Speaker 1: Congresswoman to Leave Roe Connor has been on many times
Speaker 1: open to further engagement. Abdul El sayat who we talked
Speaker 1: about earlier this week, UH and and zoron Marxist, Kami Mom, Donnie, Congresswoman,
Speaker 1: Summer Lee, you know, joining Piker, you know. And then
Speaker 1: the others expressed openness, including Gavin Newsom and Tom's Steyer
Speaker 1: and uh and others, you know. But so why is
Speaker 1: it important? I think people need to understand what do
Speaker 1: I talk often about on this program. I talk about radicalism,
Speaker 1: radical leftism. There's nothing to debate with this guy. I mean,
Speaker 1: if you want to rationalize, you know the thought pattern
Speaker 1: of people in this country that have no problem with
Speaker 1: with assassinating the United Healthcare CEO. Okay, just feel free.
Speaker 1: But then you're gonna align yourself with prominent elected Democrats.
Speaker 1: Does that not prove how radicalized that party has become?
Speaker 5: But Sean, with all due respect, and I mean this seriously,
Speaker 5: You're giving a platform to someone and it doesn't matter
Speaker 5: who aligns with him, because if you look at accountability,
Speaker 5: there's none of it. Nobody goes to jail, there is
Speaker 5: no accountability. We have a Republican House and Senate who
Speaker 5: can't get one damn thing passed that our president wants.
Speaker 5: No accountability, they all go on vacation. No, but I'm
Speaker 5: just saying, this is my point. There is no accountability
Speaker 5: right or left right. So whether you put Hassan Piker
Speaker 5: on or you're not, you're not drawing attention to anything
Speaker 5: because at the end of the day, we're coming up
Speaker 5: on the twenty fifth anniversary of nine to eleven. How
Speaker 5: many people have died on nine eleven? How many people
Speaker 5: have died post nine to eleven? How many families were lost, broken,
Speaker 5: shattered and now you're going to bring on the guy
Speaker 5: who said America deserved it. I'm sorry that guy doesn't
Speaker 5: get a voice. In fact, I would like him to
Speaker 5: have no vocal cords at all. I don't think he
Speaker 5: should be talking period.
Speaker 1: Now you sound like him. Do you want to rip
Speaker 1: out his vocal cords?
Speaker 5: Yeah? Why don't. I He likes to say hyperbole in
Speaker 5: sarcasm is what he means when he says, you know
Speaker 5: that this unit CEO deserved it, that's hyperbolema.
Speaker 1: To use his style and techniques.
Speaker 5: That's what I'm saying.
Speaker 1: I think you're missing the bigger point.
Speaker 5: What is the bigger point?
Speaker 1: Look? Look, when I when I took on the issue
Speaker 1: of the pope and his remarks that God never approves
Speaker 1: of conflict, I just that just not is not biblically
Speaker 1: accurate to me. It was just a disagreement. Everyone ignored
Speaker 1: all the good things I said about the Catholic Church
Speaker 1: and its impact on me in my life. And that's fine,
Speaker 1: And but I knew going in that this what the
Speaker 1: predictable result would be. I know going in what the
Speaker 1: predictable result will be. How dare you platform him? Et cetera.
Speaker 1: That's not the point. My argument has been for the
Speaker 1: longest time, is that this Democratic Party has been so
Speaker 1: radicalized it represents nothing of the past Democratic Party.
Speaker 7: I want to stop calling it democratic. Democratic is a process,
Speaker 7: Democrat Party whatever. Stop your your your nitpicking. And my
Speaker 7: point is is that people like Schumer Hakim Jeffries are
Speaker 7: leaders in name only, and they bow with the altar
Speaker 7: of these radicals because they're the ones that are really
Speaker 7: in control. And that's why Schumer wouldn't even stand up
Speaker 7: to mom Donnie. That's why Hakeem Jeffries wouldn't stand up
Speaker 7: to Mom.
Speaker 5: Donn That's not why. That's not why it.
Speaker 1: Is so because they know they would alienate their base
Speaker 1: in negative and they wouldn't even be leaders in name only.
Speaker 1: At that point, they would be done, they'd be gone.
Speaker 5: Nope, I just agree.
Speaker 1: You want to know why you're wrong?
Speaker 5: You don't even know what I'm going to say. How
Speaker 5: could the defense be wrong? I haven't even started.
Speaker 1: Yes is wrong.
Speaker 5: Let me tell you why. The reason why they don't
Speaker 5: stand up to him, the reason why they're all in
Speaker 5: bed together is because the guy that's paying for all
Speaker 5: of their campaigns, the guy that's paying for everything they do.
Speaker 5: It's all the same people, it's all the same organizations.
Speaker 5: They have to stay lock step. It's like I always say,
Speaker 5: Democrats are incredible at staying together. They are like glue.
Speaker 5: They're like an old piece of gum. It just won't separate.
Speaker 5: It's fantastic.
Speaker 1: The Republicans said this. I've said this for years. Republicans
Speaker 1: create circular firing squads. Democrats, Uh, they circle the wagons.
Speaker 1: There's a big difference. But that's not the environment we
Speaker 1: live in now. If you go back to the Reagan years,
Speaker 1: if you go back further, you know, there was a
Speaker 1: time when they were more rational and at this point
Speaker 1: in time, they've become so radicalized, so extreme, so hostile
Speaker 1: that they would take this country. They're like James Carvel's.
Speaker 1: You know, if they get power, there's going to be
Speaker 1: DC's statehood, Puerto Rico statehood. We're going to jam pack
Speaker 1: the Supreme Court, we'll end the filibuster, and it'll be
Speaker 1: one party rule. They'll Abigail Spamberger every state in terms
Speaker 1: of jerrymandering for their advantage.
Speaker 5: And that will happen if we don't pass the Save Act.
Speaker 1: I agree with you problem. Most Americans don't know the
Speaker 1: influence to that people like this guy are having and
Speaker 1: the embrace that they're receiving from prominent Democratic voices. I
Speaker 1: would argue the list of people Democrats. I just mentioned
Speaker 1: that that list of Democrats is far more influential, powerful
Speaker 1: than Chuck Schumer, Hakeem, Jeffries, or any old mainstream Democrat.
Speaker 1: There aren't any mainstream Democrats. There is one. His name
Speaker 1: is John and Fetterman. That's it. Every other Democrat has
Speaker 1: lost their mind. Now we have a very important midterm election,
Speaker 1: and all people want to focus in on is Donald Trump.
Speaker 1: Donald Trump. You know, I have an article right here
Speaker 1: in front of me from today, part of my long
Speaker 1: research that I do, and you know leading up to
Speaker 1: today's show. I mean, this is from Axios Day one.
Speaker 1: They call it impeachment Day one. House Democrats of pushing
Speaker 1: their colleagues to begin to build the case against President
Speaker 1: Trump now in anticipation of a day one impeachment vote
Speaker 1: if they retake the House. Why it matters. The mere
Speaker 1: existence of this movement shows how much pressure Democratic lawmakers
Speaker 1: will face next January if they retake the House. This
Speaker 1: article is not off base, and I'm just telling you
Speaker 1: of what you saw and we had on earlier on
Speaker 1: the program, we were talking to Ken Couchinelli about this
Speaker 1: jerry mandering, you know, power grab in Virginia. If you
Speaker 1: don't know what the radicals that are in charge of
Speaker 1: thinking and most normal people, I argue, don't. But I'm
Speaker 1: going to tell you what the criticism will be. But
Speaker 1: whether I do this or not, I haven't really fully
Speaker 1: decided yet. I'm thinking about it. I could go in
Speaker 1: with a lot of different strategies against this guy, and
Speaker 1: I don't want to telegraph which one, but the one
Speaker 1: that I want the most I want him to talk.
Speaker 1: I want him to explain.
Speaker 5: Do you want him to bring a dog that he
Speaker 5: electrocutes while he talks? That should be a fine background element.
Speaker 1: Oh my gosh, I'm not wrong.
Speaker 5: It's on video. Whether he's using a vibration collar, a
Speaker 5: shot collar. That dog moved too much during his broadcast
Speaker 5: and he did whatever he did do. He's like, got
Speaker 5: in shock and it's a vibration collar. She was moving
Speaker 5: too much. I'm like, it's a dog, bro, that's what
Speaker 5: we're doing.
Speaker 1: You don't believe in like the electric fence.
Speaker 5: Hell no, absolutely not, that's disgusting.
Speaker 1: I Meanwhile, you've overfeed your cat.
Speaker 5: Don't stay focused, don't drift away from Hassan Piker and
Speaker 5: how much I don't like him.
Speaker 1: Oh, I'm making a point off of your point. All right,
Speaker 1: to our phones, let us say hi to DJ in
Speaker 1: North Carolina. Heye, DJ, Hi Son.
Speaker 8: Well, you just mentioned something about the Democrats wanting to
Speaker 8: impeach President Trump and everything, and they had come up
Speaker 8: with the fake whistleblower and all the fake evidence and everything,
Speaker 8: and I wanted to find that do we as the
Speaker 8: American people, have any recourse against these people to keep
Speaker 8: this kind of thing from happening again?
Speaker 1: Yeah, the recourses that every one of you listening to
Speaker 1: my voice right now this Friday, and I know it's
Speaker 1: you know, a nice you know, spring weekend for many people.
Speaker 1: That you keep in mind that you have one importance
Speaker 1: civic duty this year, and that is commit in your heart,
Speaker 1: your mind, and your soul that you're going to go
Speaker 1: out and vote. And the very radical people we were
Speaker 1: just talking about, you're going to vote them out of
Speaker 1: power and not allow them to do what they're planning
Speaker 1: to do. They're already telegraphing what they'll do. James Carville
Speaker 1: telegraphed it. These people are telling you on day one
Speaker 1: they will come in in power in the House of
Speaker 1: Representatives and impeach Donald Trump. They don't even have a
Speaker 1: reason for it, and they'll do it, and this country
Speaker 1: will be spiraling out of control into chaos. That they
Speaker 1: are a party of rage, a party of radical rage.
Speaker 1: And I don't think most Americans are is fully aware
Speaker 1: of how bad it is, which is part of my
Speaker 1: thinking that I want people to know more. I know
Speaker 1: I'll get yelled at because Hannity, you didn't push back, Hannity,
Speaker 1: you interrupted too much, Hannity, you platform this guy. Well,
Speaker 1: am I better off of people better off being ignorant?
Speaker 1: Let me tell you something. I put this guy on
Speaker 1: my show. This goes viral, and I have avoided a
Speaker 1: lot of the I would call it clickbait attempts that
Speaker 1: other people have embraced openly to bring on the most
Speaker 1: extreme people for the very reason is I think it's
Speaker 1: usually not worthwhile. However, this might be worthwhile for people
Speaker 1: to educate themselves and realize how bad what I know
Speaker 1: and what I study every day really is, because that's
Speaker 1: how so many people think I'm gonna wrap things up.
Speaker 1: But today don't forget. We will be monitoring all the
Speaker 1: situation going on with Epic Fury. Is this blockade and
Speaker 1: Bargo really gonna work? Well know a lot more by Monday, Linda,
Speaker 1: this weekend, I'm giving you a very direct order as
Speaker 1: your boss. You boss Liam gets Kick fil A with
Speaker 1: waffle fries cooked in oil and all the pizza he
Speaker 1: wants from Uncle Sean and milkshakes and a sprite as
Speaker 1: many sprites as he wants.
Speaker 5: How much pepti bismals should I be preparing to buy
Speaker 5: for this extravaganza.
Speaker 1: Pepi bismal.
Speaker 5: It could be a lot of pepi bismal.
Speaker 1: All right, that's it for today, have a great weekend,
Speaker 1: Thank you for making the show possible, and we'll see
Speaker 1: you back here on Monday.