WEBVTT - MLB: Leading Off September 9th, 2022 (Ep. 592)

0:00:12.480 --> 0:00:14.200
<v Speaker 1>It's time for a little bit of leading off.

0:00:14.400 --> 0:00:16.840
<v Speaker 2>Good morning, good afternoon, and maybe good night.

0:00:16.840 --> 0:00:19.400
<v Speaker 1>To listen to the podcast version of it, I am

0:00:19.480 --> 0:00:21.160
<v Speaker 1>your host today, Chris Welsh.

0:00:21.280 --> 0:00:22.520
<v Speaker 2>It's a Chris Chris show.

0:00:23.239 --> 0:00:26.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Chris cleig Is. That's horrible. We really need theme

0:00:26.640 --> 0:00:28.040
<v Speaker 1>songs here, Clig, that's what we need.

0:00:28.080 --> 0:00:30.520
<v Speaker 2>The Chris rot o Clegg.

0:00:30.560 --> 0:00:33.120
<v Speaker 1>You can find him on Twitter catch all the great

0:00:33.159 --> 0:00:37.040
<v Speaker 1>stuff from podcasting to articles, to prospect coverage and more.

0:00:37.560 --> 0:00:39.159
<v Speaker 1>You can get all that cool stuff with Chris and

0:00:39.200 --> 0:00:42.200
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna be hanging with me today. We've got some debuts,

0:00:42.280 --> 0:00:44.720
<v Speaker 1>we have some big performances and you know, funny thing,

0:00:44.800 --> 0:00:47.280
<v Speaker 1>the very first comment in the chat made me chuckle

0:00:48.159 --> 0:00:50.800
<v Speaker 1>behind the scenes here because dang wrote, I only had

0:00:50.840 --> 0:00:53.720
<v Speaker 1>two guys playing yesterday and they both went over four.

0:00:54.000 --> 0:00:57.840
<v Speaker 1>Those like those low output games always kind of kill

0:00:57.880 --> 0:01:00.080
<v Speaker 1>me a little bit. You know, days where it's like

0:01:00.080 --> 0:01:03.160
<v Speaker 1>you're in the playoffs, you're rocking, and like five teams

0:01:03.240 --> 0:01:05.399
<v Speaker 1>play and you could might only have a handful of

0:01:05.400 --> 0:01:07.440
<v Speaker 1>guys going on that day, especially when you have no

0:01:07.520 --> 0:01:11.600
<v Speaker 1>starters going and all of your bad hitters are all

0:01:11.680 --> 0:01:13.640
<v Speaker 1>your bad hitters are the ones going, not the good ones,

0:01:13.640 --> 0:01:15.760
<v Speaker 1>and you're sitting here and you're just like, what am

0:01:15.760 --> 0:01:17.399
<v Speaker 1>I supposed to do? Cleg, what am I supposed to do?

0:01:18.400 --> 0:01:18.920
<v Speaker 2>That's tough.

0:01:19.200 --> 0:01:21.759
<v Speaker 3>Yesterday kind of a tough day all around. So looking

0:01:21.840 --> 0:01:23.720
<v Speaker 3>forward to a good Friday slate though. It's gonna be

0:01:23.800 --> 0:01:26.400
<v Speaker 3>a good one, good weekend hopefully for all the listeners

0:01:26.440 --> 0:01:28.040
<v Speaker 3>out there. I know it's playoff time for head to

0:01:28.040 --> 0:01:30.800
<v Speaker 3>head leagues, kind of the finals treads for roto leagues

0:01:31.080 --> 0:01:33.040
<v Speaker 3>hitting that peak time, and hey people, some people were

0:01:33.080 --> 0:01:35.039
<v Speaker 3>checking out for fantasy football. So if you're still listening

0:01:35.080 --> 0:01:37.399
<v Speaker 3>to this, props to you. I'm glad you're with us

0:01:37.440 --> 0:01:38.920
<v Speaker 3>and looking forward to the show today.

0:01:39.160 --> 0:01:41.840
<v Speaker 1>We're still rocking it TL. This week we were talking

0:01:41.840 --> 0:01:44.440
<v Speaker 1>about some weekend streamers, which weekend streamers are kind of

0:01:44.440 --> 0:01:47.320
<v Speaker 1>tough this weekend. If you're trying to put something out

0:01:47.319 --> 0:01:50.840
<v Speaker 1>there's not a ton I'd say I think Heasley's going today.

0:01:51.040 --> 0:01:53.560
<v Speaker 1>I kind of like him. He went eight last time

0:01:53.600 --> 0:01:56.480
<v Speaker 1>he minutes against the Tigers, didn't strike out a whole bunch,

0:01:56.560 --> 0:01:59.440
<v Speaker 1>but went eight. He's been pretty decent. Jordan Lyles is

0:01:59.440 --> 0:02:01.920
<v Speaker 1>scheduled to go Sunday. He was set to be a

0:02:01.960 --> 0:02:04.480
<v Speaker 1>two starter this week but he had that pushed. So

0:02:04.680 --> 0:02:07.480
<v Speaker 1>there's a couple guys out there. There's not a whole

0:02:07.520 --> 0:02:10.120
<v Speaker 1>bunch that you can put together, but it does seem

0:02:10.160 --> 0:02:12.320
<v Speaker 1>like there are some decent two starters next week. If

0:02:12.360 --> 0:02:15.079
<v Speaker 1>you're going really really deep, you know, guy like Cole

0:02:15.120 --> 0:02:17.440
<v Speaker 1>Reagan's might be a guy. But there are a few

0:02:17.639 --> 0:02:19.400
<v Speaker 1>that you can dig into. But let's talk about what

0:02:19.440 --> 0:02:22.720
<v Speaker 1>went down yesterday. Yo Malcatta, now, Yo Mancatta out to

0:02:22.880 --> 0:02:25.080
<v Speaker 1>I hit dow Homa, hit a couple of Tom Holmas.

0:02:25.320 --> 0:02:27.800
<v Speaker 1>When I get like that, and whenever I said ya Ancotta,

0:02:27.840 --> 0:02:30.640
<v Speaker 1>bagman pointed something out to me that I can be

0:02:30.919 --> 0:02:34.480
<v Speaker 1>relatively articulate while also saying things really stupid. But there

0:02:34.520 --> 0:02:37.840
<v Speaker 1>are a couple names that turn me into a different person.

0:02:38.000 --> 0:02:40.200
<v Speaker 1>Cal Rally col Rally turns me into a different person

0:02:40.240 --> 0:02:43.120
<v Speaker 1>when I say his name, And Yo Mancotta, Yo Mancotta, now,

0:02:43.360 --> 0:02:46.960
<v Speaker 1>Yo Mancatta went five for six yesterday, hit two homers,

0:02:47.280 --> 0:02:51.040
<v Speaker 1>five rbi as the White Sox beat the As fourteen

0:02:51.120 --> 0:02:54.240
<v Speaker 1>to two. Dylan Seese was pretty good himself. Moncatta has

0:02:54.280 --> 0:02:58.040
<v Speaker 1>been such a distant thought this year, almost a non factor.

0:02:59.320 --> 0:03:02.520
<v Speaker 1>If Moncotta pick it up through the back end of

0:03:02.560 --> 0:03:04.839
<v Speaker 1>this last month, do you think there'd be anything going

0:03:04.880 --> 0:03:06.480
<v Speaker 1>into next week or next year for you?

0:03:07.720 --> 0:03:08.240
<v Speaker 2>Maybe?

0:03:08.480 --> 0:03:11.160
<v Speaker 3>Unfortunately, I have him seen on the bench in a

0:03:11.200 --> 0:03:13.240
<v Speaker 3>twenty team dynasty league and this where you can.

0:03:13.200 --> 0:03:16.320
<v Speaker 1>Missed that yesterday. So that was happen in place of him?

0:03:16.720 --> 0:03:20.320
<v Speaker 3>About that, because that's how I feel, Yeah, exactly, that's

0:03:20.360 --> 0:03:22.040
<v Speaker 3>how bad he's been this year. Then a twenty team

0:03:22.080 --> 0:03:26.120
<v Speaker 3>I'd even feel he was startable in a full roto lineup.

0:03:26.160 --> 0:03:27.880
<v Speaker 2>Thats middle and corner and all that.

0:03:27.960 --> 0:03:30.840
<v Speaker 3>Let me see, I don't know, he's just been so

0:03:31.080 --> 0:03:33.880
<v Speaker 3>bad that it's kind of just been. I had Bregmann

0:03:33.880 --> 0:03:38.080
<v Speaker 3>over him, but then in the middle infield is crazy enough.

0:03:38.240 --> 0:03:40.840
<v Speaker 1>Sorry, corner and field, I had Keston g Heer over him.

0:03:41.440 --> 0:03:43.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, okay, So that's the big key right there.

0:03:43.280 --> 0:03:45.680
<v Speaker 1>That's kind of the point. Moncotta hit two eleven so

0:03:45.760 --> 0:03:48.080
<v Speaker 1>far this year. That was more than twenty percent of

0:03:48.080 --> 0:03:52.640
<v Speaker 1>his homer output in that single game, and it's closing

0:03:52.680 --> 0:03:54.920
<v Speaker 1>in on over it's actually a little bit over ten

0:03:54.960 --> 0:03:57.360
<v Speaker 1>percent of his RBI production. All happened in the one game.

0:03:57.400 --> 0:03:59.880
<v Speaker 1>That's how bad he's been. He's just been trash on

0:04:00.080 --> 0:04:02.920
<v Speaker 1>the year. Strike up presentage has been up, doesn't walk anymore.

0:04:03.160 --> 0:04:06.600
<v Speaker 1>It's a good outlier, but it's not necessarily anything to

0:04:06.600 --> 0:04:08.320
<v Speaker 1>get excited about. Wouldn't be surprised if he's out on

0:04:08.320 --> 0:04:12.720
<v Speaker 1>the wire. Corvid Burns struck out fourteen while throwing eight

0:04:12.720 --> 0:04:15.400
<v Speaker 1>innings of one run ball as they beat up on

0:04:15.440 --> 0:04:18.520
<v Speaker 1>the Giants. It was part of a first on the doubleheader.

0:04:19.000 --> 0:04:22.159
<v Speaker 1>You know, not to get Nutty into this, but Corvid

0:04:22.160 --> 0:04:25.560
<v Speaker 1>Burns with those big outputs. Dylan Ceese has been solid.

0:04:25.960 --> 0:04:29.640
<v Speaker 1>Do you think there's any consensus on what the top

0:04:29.960 --> 0:04:33.200
<v Speaker 1>sp looks like for next year? Like number one, number two?

0:04:33.240 --> 0:04:34.880
<v Speaker 1>Even if I gave you top one and two because

0:04:34.920 --> 0:04:36.960
<v Speaker 1>McClanahan with the injury and the kind of little bit

0:04:37.000 --> 0:04:40.360
<v Speaker 1>of a falloff to Gram has comeback, there's Verlander. Do

0:04:40.440 --> 0:04:42.800
<v Speaker 1>you think there's any consensus of who belongs on the

0:04:42.839 --> 0:04:44.200
<v Speaker 1>top two or do you think it might be a

0:04:44.200 --> 0:04:46.000
<v Speaker 1>bigger clump of like five guys.

0:04:46.640 --> 0:04:47.560
<v Speaker 2>It could be a big clump.

0:04:47.600 --> 0:04:50.120
<v Speaker 3>But if de Gram stays healthy the rest of the

0:04:50.160 --> 0:04:52.760
<v Speaker 3>season and pitches well, then I have a hard time

0:04:52.800 --> 0:04:55.360
<v Speaker 3>seeing anybody but him at the top. But I mean

0:04:55.880 --> 0:04:58.720
<v Speaker 3>you could like Burns is obviously going through a rough patch,

0:04:58.720 --> 0:05:01.440
<v Speaker 3>but yesterday he looked the part again so he could

0:05:01.480 --> 0:05:03.400
<v Speaker 3>find his way back up in there. But I think

0:05:03.400 --> 0:05:05.880
<v Speaker 3>you're right. I think if de Grom's healthy, he's won.

0:05:05.960 --> 0:05:07.640
<v Speaker 3>But then after that's kind of a clump of guys

0:05:07.680 --> 0:05:10.320
<v Speaker 3>that could go any anywhere from like two to six

0:05:10.360 --> 0:05:10.760
<v Speaker 3>to seven.

0:05:10.839 --> 0:05:11.839
<v Speaker 2>Maybe that's I.

0:05:11.839 --> 0:05:13.560
<v Speaker 1>Think it's going to be interesting. I'm probably going to

0:05:13.640 --> 0:05:15.920
<v Speaker 1>be the guy that wants the end of a tier.

0:05:16.120 --> 0:05:18.000
<v Speaker 1>If I'm going to be targeting, I probably don't want

0:05:18.040 --> 0:05:21.279
<v Speaker 1>to start the tier of the pictures. But between Burns

0:05:21.440 --> 0:05:23.680
<v Speaker 1>and you know, you can throw Cole in there, and

0:05:23.920 --> 0:05:27.920
<v Speaker 1>McClanahan and maybe cease de Grom. You can even throw

0:05:28.960 --> 0:05:30.960
<v Speaker 1>o who am I for? I mean, I said Verlander,

0:05:31.000 --> 0:05:33.480
<v Speaker 1>Oh al Contra, even though he's been tapering back a

0:05:33.520 --> 0:05:36.039
<v Speaker 1>little bit, like I'll probably want the back end of

0:05:36.080 --> 0:05:40.520
<v Speaker 1>a tier and Spencer Strider him him on top of

0:05:40.560 --> 0:05:42.880
<v Speaker 1>whatever the other guy is is, can it probably be

0:05:42.960 --> 0:05:43.600
<v Speaker 1>my taste?

0:05:43.960 --> 0:05:46.200
<v Speaker 2>kN rose Thal and Evandrelitcha.

0:05:46.279 --> 0:05:49.599
<v Speaker 1>The Athletic had reported that there was some expectations of

0:05:49.640 --> 0:05:53.120
<v Speaker 1>new rules, but Every Baseball Writer reported probably about ten

0:05:53.160 --> 0:05:57.360
<v Speaker 1>minutes ago that the new rule changes have been enacted

0:05:57.480 --> 0:06:00.279
<v Speaker 1>and they will take place in twenty and thirteen all

0:06:00.279 --> 0:06:04.560
<v Speaker 1>the new rules are going to be no shifting. That's

0:06:04.600 --> 0:06:07.000
<v Speaker 1>probably the biggest rule in here. There's there's gonna be

0:06:07.080 --> 0:06:09.560
<v Speaker 1>versions of shifting, but not like we know it. There's

0:06:09.600 --> 0:06:11.920
<v Speaker 1>got to be a believe two guys on the one

0:06:12.000 --> 0:06:14.640
<v Speaker 1>side of second base, so it's really going to kind

0:06:14.640 --> 0:06:17.000
<v Speaker 1>of take that away. There's also a pitch clock, which

0:06:17.839 --> 0:06:20.400
<v Speaker 1>Chris and I have both experienced for quite a few

0:06:20.440 --> 0:06:22.680
<v Speaker 1>years here with the minor leagues, and the AFAFL is

0:06:22.720 --> 0:06:25.680
<v Speaker 1>actually the first time that they experimented with it a

0:06:25.680 --> 0:06:27.560
<v Speaker 1>couple of years ago, and the Arison a fall league,

0:06:27.839 --> 0:06:29.440
<v Speaker 1>we both know that. And then they are going to

0:06:29.480 --> 0:06:33.600
<v Speaker 1>expand the base paths from fifteen to eighteen inches. So

0:06:34.000 --> 0:06:37.120
<v Speaker 1>and he takes on the new rules and what I

0:06:37.160 --> 0:06:39.280
<v Speaker 1>mean really it's this is probably just about the shift

0:06:39.279 --> 0:06:41.040
<v Speaker 1>and what that's going to do to baseball.

0:06:41.440 --> 0:06:43.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so I started doing a little more analysis on

0:06:43.680 --> 0:06:46.240
<v Speaker 3>shift last night and just looking at guys who have

0:06:46.360 --> 0:06:49.640
<v Speaker 3>struggling babbitts against the shift. And you know, the top

0:06:49.760 --> 0:06:52.040
<v Speaker 3>name that came up was Kyle Tucker running a two

0:06:52.080 --> 0:06:54.640
<v Speaker 3>forty seven babbit against the shift and a four to

0:06:54.760 --> 0:06:58.440
<v Speaker 3>fifty seven babbit against non shifted and he's only he

0:06:58.480 --> 0:07:00.000
<v Speaker 3>gets shifted ninety one percent of the time.

0:07:00.320 --> 0:07:02.320
<v Speaker 2>But another one that popped up that was interesting was

0:07:02.400 --> 0:07:03.240
<v Speaker 2>m J. Melndez.

0:07:03.440 --> 0:07:05.520
<v Speaker 3>He gets shifted about seventy five percent of the time

0:07:05.760 --> 0:07:09.239
<v Speaker 3>two oh three Babbitt against four to eleven Babbo without

0:07:09.240 --> 0:07:11.720
<v Speaker 3>the shifts. So there's some fun other fun names on

0:07:11.760 --> 0:07:14.680
<v Speaker 3>this top of this list, like Cody Bellinger. I'm not

0:07:14.720 --> 0:07:16.440
<v Speaker 3>sure you know what even to make of him at

0:07:16.440 --> 0:07:17.040
<v Speaker 3>this point.

0:07:17.440 --> 0:07:19.520
<v Speaker 1>Was not very fun, but I know what you're saying here, Yeah, yeah,

0:07:19.640 --> 0:07:21.920
<v Speaker 1>it'll be kind of probably be the big thing, the

0:07:22.000 --> 0:07:24.960
<v Speaker 1>big kind of buzzy article to write this offseason will

0:07:25.000 --> 0:07:27.320
<v Speaker 1>be the players that will benefit from the lack of

0:07:27.320 --> 0:07:29.280
<v Speaker 1>a shift, and you just kind of you gave us

0:07:29.320 --> 0:07:31.200
<v Speaker 1>a tease to one him. J. Melndez might be one

0:07:31.240 --> 0:07:33.520
<v Speaker 1>of those players that it's not going to show up

0:07:33.520 --> 0:07:36.120
<v Speaker 1>on the statuet or anything like that, but they are

0:07:36.160 --> 0:07:37.720
<v Speaker 1>going There are going to be players that are going

0:07:37.760 --> 0:07:40.600
<v Speaker 1>to benefit from teams not being able to do these

0:07:40.720 --> 0:07:44.880
<v Speaker 1>massive shifts and if the players can take part in it.

0:07:45.000 --> 0:07:49.360
<v Speaker 1>So very interesting stuff, very interesting stuff. The base paths,

0:07:50.200 --> 0:07:52.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean maybe for stealing. You know, it's the little

0:07:52.680 --> 0:07:54.920
<v Speaker 1>quarter inch that's going to help a few guys out

0:07:54.960 --> 0:07:57.680
<v Speaker 1>there and the clock. If anything, the clock is just

0:07:57.800 --> 0:08:00.160
<v Speaker 1>for us to go to games. It just believe me,

0:08:00.440 --> 0:08:02.200
<v Speaker 1>I know, I think I saw you tweet about it

0:08:02.240 --> 0:08:04.720
<v Speaker 1>like it's just a good thing, like it speeds the

0:08:04.760 --> 0:08:07.040
<v Speaker 1>games up. I got no issues with it. It is

0:08:07.160 --> 0:08:11.559
<v Speaker 1>rough when you get pitchers that don't want to follow

0:08:11.600 --> 0:08:14.240
<v Speaker 1>the rules and then they start getting thrown like you know,

0:08:14.280 --> 0:08:17.360
<v Speaker 1>an extra strike and stuff like that, and they get pissy.

0:08:17.400 --> 0:08:20.120
<v Speaker 1>I've definitely seen that as they've adjusted, but they just

0:08:20.240 --> 0:08:23.160
<v Speaker 1>quick the games go quicker. It's not a bad thing, no,

0:08:23.200 --> 0:08:26.240
<v Speaker 1>it's It's been highly enjoyable this year. A two hour

0:08:26.280 --> 0:08:28.840
<v Speaker 1>minor league game is fantastic, like get in and out

0:08:28.880 --> 0:08:30.720
<v Speaker 1>like and you still see the same amount of baseball.

0:08:30.720 --> 0:08:32.319
<v Speaker 2>It's just a better pace of play.

0:08:32.360 --> 0:08:35.480
<v Speaker 3>There's the lack of batter stepping out and adjusting his

0:08:35.600 --> 0:08:38.400
<v Speaker 3>batting gloves every pitch, like you don't see that as

0:08:38.480 --> 0:08:41.320
<v Speaker 3>much now. It's gonna be an adjustment for some Like

0:08:41.640 --> 0:08:43.560
<v Speaker 3>I remember at the AFL last year, we were sitting

0:08:43.600 --> 0:08:46.720
<v Speaker 3>there and Spencer Torklsen was he stepped out of the

0:08:46.720 --> 0:08:48.520
<v Speaker 3>box I think it was, and they called him out

0:08:48.559 --> 0:08:51.000
<v Speaker 3>it was a third strike. And I remember Hans Krause

0:08:51.840 --> 0:08:55.000
<v Speaker 3>yelling at the umpire. Yeah, Hans Krause yelled at the umpire.

0:08:55.280 --> 0:08:56.600
<v Speaker 2>Let him hit. This is what we're here to do.

0:08:56.640 --> 0:08:57.719
<v Speaker 2>But they struck him out on it.

0:08:57.960 --> 0:09:00.840
<v Speaker 3>I haven't seen any violations this year, but it could

0:09:00.840 --> 0:09:02.560
<v Speaker 3>be an adjustment for at least some of the vets

0:09:02.559 --> 0:09:05.560
<v Speaker 3>that have never experienced it before, so it could be interesting.

0:09:05.760 --> 0:09:07.719
<v Speaker 1>I wish I could find it real quick. It's such

0:09:07.760 --> 0:09:12.160
<v Speaker 1>a funny, interesting video. But if you guys want, go

0:09:12.200 --> 0:09:14.640
<v Speaker 1>onto my Twitter. I think you go on like the

0:09:14.679 --> 0:09:17.679
<v Speaker 1>mobile apps, you can do a search and if you

0:09:17.720 --> 0:09:20.280
<v Speaker 1>go under mine, probably type in Hans Krause, because I

0:09:20.280 --> 0:09:23.360
<v Speaker 1>don't think I've tweeted about Hans Krause since then. But yeah,

0:09:23.559 --> 0:09:26.560
<v Speaker 1>he's pitching. I'm right dead center. I'm filming it and

0:09:26.640 --> 0:09:29.200
<v Speaker 1>Torcosen steps out and they call him out and you

0:09:29.240 --> 0:09:32.360
<v Speaker 1>can literally hear Kraus go just let him hit, just

0:09:32.400 --> 0:09:34.280
<v Speaker 1>like like he didn't want the bat like they all

0:09:34.280 --> 0:09:35.880
<v Speaker 1>did not like that. And those are the things that

0:09:35.880 --> 0:09:38.080
<v Speaker 1>they need to kind of figure out. And those are

0:09:38.360 --> 0:09:40.400
<v Speaker 1>potentially a few things you might see. It's gonna get

0:09:40.400 --> 0:09:43.040
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more testy in the majors. Just pointing

0:09:43.040 --> 0:09:46.080
<v Speaker 1>that out lastly, on the headline stuff. Josh Young is

0:09:46.120 --> 0:09:48.280
<v Speaker 1>going to make his major league debut today, at least

0:09:48.320 --> 0:09:51.599
<v Speaker 1>that is what is scheduled. Then I'm not gonna have

0:09:51.600 --> 0:09:53.679
<v Speaker 1>any official lineups or anything like that, but I like

0:09:53.720 --> 0:09:56.840
<v Speaker 1>to get your take on Josh Young. We've seen Tristicasis,

0:09:56.920 --> 0:10:00.440
<v Speaker 1>we've seen totally not that Tristicassas is closer to Josh

0:10:00.440 --> 0:10:02.440
<v Speaker 1>Young than totally as totally as a big power guy,

0:10:02.800 --> 0:10:05.440
<v Speaker 1>Cosses can put up some batting average. Best of the

0:10:05.520 --> 0:10:09.360
<v Speaker 1>contact hitters is Josh Young had a great power output

0:10:09.400 --> 0:10:11.320
<v Speaker 1>for a short period of time in Triple A. I

0:10:11.320 --> 0:10:13.760
<v Speaker 1>think he hit six in Triple A, has nine total

0:10:13.800 --> 0:10:16.320
<v Speaker 1>in the minors. His batting average dipped pretty greatly though.

0:10:16.440 --> 0:10:18.080
<v Speaker 1>He's only got about one hundred and twenty four at

0:10:18.080 --> 0:10:21.480
<v Speaker 1>bats under his belt over the last year and a

0:10:21.520 --> 0:10:23.480
<v Speaker 1>half due to injury, and he's already making his major

0:10:23.559 --> 0:10:26.559
<v Speaker 1>league debut. So what's your take on Josh Young and

0:10:26.640 --> 0:10:29.240
<v Speaker 1>the AGGRESSIVENESSUE would be? You know, if you were sitting

0:10:29.240 --> 0:10:31.600
<v Speaker 1>out for people right now, I think.

0:10:31.440 --> 0:10:34.320
<v Speaker 3>He's definitely worth an ad in a fifteen team for

0:10:34.400 --> 0:10:37.480
<v Speaker 3>rest of season. He certainly looks the part. And I

0:10:37.840 --> 0:10:39.840
<v Speaker 3>didn't really know what to expect with him coming back

0:10:39.840 --> 0:10:43.600
<v Speaker 3>from a shoulder injury, especially this year. I mean long term,

0:10:43.760 --> 0:10:46.880
<v Speaker 3>really didn't have any concerns about him, but he's come

0:10:46.920 --> 0:10:49.560
<v Speaker 3>back and really looked the part he's hit for the power,

0:10:49.600 --> 0:10:51.480
<v Speaker 3>which that was kind of the concern, like what kind

0:10:51.520 --> 0:10:55.160
<v Speaker 3>of power output would he have post shoulder surgery. The

0:10:55.160 --> 0:10:58.360
<v Speaker 3>field of hits always been there, good contact skills, and

0:10:58.480 --> 0:11:01.640
<v Speaker 3>I think there's plus power in the tank as well. Obviously,

0:11:01.720 --> 0:11:03.400
<v Speaker 3>it's kind of a mixed bag as to what you

0:11:03.520 --> 0:11:07.200
<v Speaker 3>get every time a prospect comes up, so it's tough

0:11:07.240 --> 0:11:10.600
<v Speaker 3>to say with young, especially coming back from injury, but

0:11:10.920 --> 0:11:12.520
<v Speaker 3>I am willing to take a shot on him. He

0:11:12.600 --> 0:11:17.559
<v Speaker 3>makes this Rangers lineup significantly better and he should play

0:11:17.600 --> 0:11:20.760
<v Speaker 3>every single day. I can't imagine him not like who's

0:11:20.840 --> 0:11:24.960
<v Speaker 3>blocking him at third base. So I'm definitely about adding

0:11:25.040 --> 0:11:26.440
<v Speaker 3>him and seeing where it goes at this point. So

0:11:26.559 --> 0:11:29.079
<v Speaker 3>there's definitely the upside for him to be a solid contributor.

0:11:29.240 --> 0:11:33.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and I'm trying to see if going over it.

0:11:33.559 --> 0:11:38.119
<v Speaker 1>Look, he's projected to hit eight tonight. That's the projection

0:11:38.280 --> 0:11:40.880
<v Speaker 1>that I'm seeing on the lineup this according to Fantasy Labs,

0:11:40.880 --> 0:11:44.880
<v Speaker 1>and I pull it up they've got Simeon Seeger Lowe,

0:11:45.200 --> 0:11:50.679
<v Speaker 1>adoles him, Tavares, Cole Young, and then Josh Young, so

0:11:50.800 --> 0:11:52.920
<v Speaker 1>he and hitting, I mean, hitting between Cole Young and

0:11:52.920 --> 0:11:54.839
<v Speaker 1>Bobba Thompson is not the worst thing in the world,

0:11:55.120 --> 0:11:57.719
<v Speaker 1>you know. Lastly, just on that, I just point out

0:11:57.760 --> 0:12:01.319
<v Speaker 1>like I was pretty impressed with how he looked athletically,

0:12:01.360 --> 0:12:03.240
<v Speaker 1>because I've seen him a whole lot but mainly just

0:12:03.280 --> 0:12:06.040
<v Speaker 1>walking around the backfield with a sling on his arm.

0:12:06.400 --> 0:12:09.160
<v Speaker 1>Looked like he trimmed up. He was faster than I remember.

0:12:09.679 --> 0:12:12.880
<v Speaker 1>He's got a really good path to the ball. It's

0:12:13.080 --> 0:12:16.280
<v Speaker 1>just I personally think he's stuck between trying to become

0:12:16.280 --> 0:12:19.839
<v Speaker 1>a power hitter and continuously being the contact hitter. And

0:12:19.920 --> 0:12:22.680
<v Speaker 1>we'll see how that translates tonight. He's not the type

0:12:22.679 --> 0:12:24.360
<v Speaker 1>of guy I would project like he's going to hit

0:12:24.400 --> 0:12:26.200
<v Speaker 1>a homer in his first at bat. But I do

0:12:26.240 --> 0:12:27.720
<v Speaker 1>think he's going to get a hit tonight. So if

0:12:28.000 --> 0:12:30.200
<v Speaker 1>I would be tempted if there was like a prop

0:12:30.240 --> 0:12:33.000
<v Speaker 1>out there, if it was like one, you know, a half,

0:12:33.080 --> 0:12:35.160
<v Speaker 1>I would probably be tempted to take it. With Josh

0:12:35.200 --> 0:12:37.520
<v Speaker 1>Young getting a hit tonight, but makes his major league debut,

0:12:38.520 --> 0:12:42.000
<v Speaker 1>probably the last of the prospects that we're going to

0:12:42.040 --> 0:12:44.000
<v Speaker 1>really care about getting a call up, and Alec Burlson

0:12:44.080 --> 0:12:46.760
<v Speaker 1>got the call up. Actually didn't even look at see

0:12:46.760 --> 0:12:48.880
<v Speaker 1>what his line was. But other than that, I'm not

0:12:48.960 --> 0:12:52.320
<v Speaker 1>do you have any expectation of any other prospect that

0:12:52.440 --> 0:12:53.840
<v Speaker 1>might be waiting in the wings we get a call

0:12:53.920 --> 0:12:55.040
<v Speaker 1>up on or do you think this is it?

0:12:55.760 --> 0:12:57.440
<v Speaker 3>It feels like this is it at this point, And

0:12:57.679 --> 0:13:02.280
<v Speaker 3>you've seen most every major prospect that was MLB ready

0:13:02.280 --> 0:13:05.400
<v Speaker 3>to get the call So I don't really foresee any

0:13:05.400 --> 0:13:09.480
<v Speaker 3>other big names at this point unless something crazy were

0:13:09.559 --> 0:13:10.000
<v Speaker 3>to happen.

0:13:10.040 --> 0:13:12.520
<v Speaker 2>But I feel like this is kind of it right now.

0:13:12.640 --> 0:13:16.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I'd also point out teams, agents, and players are

0:13:16.280 --> 0:13:18.839
<v Speaker 1>getting pretty set for the Arizona Fall League. I did

0:13:18.840 --> 0:13:21.800
<v Speaker 1>an episode my prospect show, Prospect one, where I did

0:13:21.800 --> 0:13:25.480
<v Speaker 1>the Arizona Fall League predictions, and you know, each team,

0:13:25.559 --> 0:13:27.560
<v Speaker 1>each major league team since out like five to eight

0:13:27.600 --> 0:13:29.880
<v Speaker 1>players to the Arizona Fall League, and I was predicting

0:13:29.920 --> 0:13:32.840
<v Speaker 1>who those players are. I have some pretty incredible accuracy.

0:13:32.920 --> 0:13:35.640
<v Speaker 1>Right now, I had only been forced, i'd only been

0:13:35.679 --> 0:13:38.440
<v Speaker 1>given a couple players, and then ever since I've done

0:13:38.480 --> 0:13:41.480
<v Speaker 1>that episode, I've had a ton more confirmed that I've

0:13:41.480 --> 0:13:44.920
<v Speaker 1>seen probably about twenty to thirty percent of the AFL rosters.

0:13:45.400 --> 0:13:47.560
<v Speaker 1>And my whole point of that is, though, is like

0:13:48.080 --> 0:13:51.240
<v Speaker 1>they're all kind of planning and for some you know,

0:13:51.440 --> 0:13:53.520
<v Speaker 1>teams are just not going to consider bringing up players

0:13:53.520 --> 0:13:55.439
<v Speaker 1>so they can just you know, throw them to the.

0:13:55.360 --> 0:13:58.040
<v Speaker 2>Arizona Fall League. I think some plans may have changed.

0:13:58.400 --> 0:14:00.640
<v Speaker 1>And who knows. I thought Josh Young was gonna come

0:14:00.640 --> 0:14:02.839
<v Speaker 1>to the foll League. Maybe he still will. We'll see,

0:14:02.840 --> 0:14:05.560
<v Speaker 1>but that's probably about it. Go Cards also mentioned Burlson

0:14:05.640 --> 0:14:08.280
<v Speaker 1>oh for four with the walk and a strikeout. For

0:14:08.320 --> 0:14:11.800
<v Speaker 1>Burlson in his debut, he also had to run. Nothing exciting.

0:14:12.200 --> 0:14:15.160
<v Speaker 1>I know Andrew was excited about him yesterday. Not me,

0:14:15.360 --> 0:14:17.640
<v Speaker 1>not as much as I am. But you know, he's

0:14:17.640 --> 0:14:19.240
<v Speaker 1>getting some playing time and that's good. So on the

0:14:19.240 --> 0:14:22.440
<v Speaker 1>injury front, Eric Lower underwent an MRI on his strained

0:14:22.680 --> 0:14:25.320
<v Speaker 1>left elbow on Thursday. He left his start against the

0:14:25.400 --> 0:14:27.760
<v Speaker 1>Rockies on Wednesday. He only went two and two thirds.

0:14:27.920 --> 0:14:30.320
<v Speaker 1>He was diagnosed with a left elbow strain and they

0:14:30.400 --> 0:14:34.400
<v Speaker 1>said that they said that there was an encouragement on that.

0:14:34.520 --> 0:14:38.360
<v Speaker 1>So whatever that means, if you're hoping, I've got lower

0:14:38.440 --> 0:14:40.280
<v Speaker 1>available in a couple leagues that I've seen out on

0:14:40.320 --> 0:14:41.840
<v Speaker 1>the wire and I haven't picked him up. So that's

0:14:41.840 --> 0:14:44.760
<v Speaker 1>where that sits. The other injury stuff, Yankees vanager Aaron

0:14:44.800 --> 0:14:47.600
<v Speaker 1>Boone told reporters that he's unsure if Stanton char Carlos

0:14:47.600 --> 0:14:48.160
<v Speaker 1>Stanton is going.

0:14:48.160 --> 0:14:49.120
<v Speaker 2>To play today.

0:14:49.520 --> 0:14:52.080
<v Speaker 1>They said, we'll see, and he's not sure yet, so

0:14:52.080 --> 0:14:54.440
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna have to wait for official lineups. That really

0:14:54.480 --> 0:14:57.720
<v Speaker 1>sounds like not going to but we'll take a look

0:14:57.760 --> 0:15:00.000
<v Speaker 1>at it. And then probably should have put the Brewers

0:15:00.160 --> 0:15:02.960
<v Speaker 1>news together. Crek Council told reporters that Freddy Perrault has

0:15:03.000 --> 0:15:05.000
<v Speaker 1>been placed on the IL so I think that's his

0:15:06.360 --> 0:15:09.960
<v Speaker 1>twelve hundredth stent this year and it's been kind of

0:15:09.960 --> 0:15:12.320
<v Speaker 1>a forgetable year. I think for Freddy PERRAULTA had some

0:15:12.360 --> 0:15:15.320
<v Speaker 1>inconsistencies as he gets like to the second third time

0:15:15.360 --> 0:15:18.760
<v Speaker 1>to the order, a couple injuries, probably needing to move on.

0:15:19.200 --> 0:15:22.120
<v Speaker 1>This was fun. Wonky put this on. This is the

0:15:22.160 --> 0:15:24.560
<v Speaker 1>other sporting news. I wish I could share this piece

0:15:24.600 --> 0:15:28.680
<v Speaker 1>of art. We probably should. It's called the Angels team Leaders.

0:15:29.320 --> 0:15:31.920
<v Speaker 1>Is just show hey Otani and I don't know if

0:15:31.920 --> 0:15:34.640
<v Speaker 1>you're looking at this cleg. As far as batting goes

0:15:34.760 --> 0:15:39.240
<v Speaker 1>Otani is the leader in batting average, home runs RBI,

0:15:39.600 --> 0:15:42.000
<v Speaker 1>So he's a triple Crown Angels winner.

0:15:42.320 --> 0:15:44.000
<v Speaker 2>OBP and hits.

0:15:44.640 --> 0:15:48.560
<v Speaker 1>And as a pitcher he's the winner in wins, era

0:15:49.240 --> 0:15:52.520
<v Speaker 1>in strikeouts. I mean, he is a triple Crown winner.

0:15:52.720 --> 0:15:54.880
<v Speaker 1>Is a triple Crown winner on both sides of the

0:15:54.920 --> 0:15:58.480
<v Speaker 1>fall here. But you know it's not the MVP leg Otani.

0:15:58.720 --> 0:16:00.200
<v Speaker 1>He's kind of good, kind of a good.

0:16:00.320 --> 0:16:01.200
<v Speaker 2>Right, right.

0:16:01.280 --> 0:16:03.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, And if you want to start a good Twitter fight,

0:16:03.200 --> 0:16:06.000
<v Speaker 3>just go post about Judge or Otani being the MVP

0:16:06.200 --> 0:16:07.520
<v Speaker 3>and somebody will come around.

0:16:07.840 --> 0:16:10.120
<v Speaker 1>I can't even do it anymore. I've talked about it

0:16:10.200 --> 0:16:12.320
<v Speaker 1>so much and we brought it up so much that

0:16:12.400 --> 0:16:14.480
<v Speaker 1>like eyes roll as soon as it happens. So this

0:16:14.480 --> 0:16:17.360
<v Speaker 1>isn't an MVP conversation. I just thought that was interesting

0:16:17.400 --> 0:16:21.080
<v Speaker 1>because you'll definitely have player I mean, who's the last

0:16:21.080 --> 0:16:24.040
<v Speaker 1>player you think led their team in average Homer's RBI,

0:16:24.160 --> 0:16:25.680
<v Speaker 1>OBP and hits alone.

0:16:25.880 --> 0:16:26.960
<v Speaker 2>I mean that's not that often.

0:16:27.000 --> 0:16:28.680
<v Speaker 1>That's usually a triple crown thing. What a couple of

0:16:28.760 --> 0:16:34.160
<v Speaker 1>years ago for for Miguel Vladdie, maybe.

0:16:33.960 --> 0:16:36.680
<v Speaker 2>Last year, right, Yeah, I would guess.

0:16:36.720 --> 0:16:42.720
<v Speaker 1>So this is a fun fact, not a conversation piece. Yeah,

0:16:42.840 --> 0:16:45.320
<v Speaker 1>I just want to know, just want to know. Yeah, there,

0:16:45.400 --> 0:16:47.160
<v Speaker 1>what's thereon Judge? Now we won't do They're in Judge

0:16:47.160 --> 0:16:49.760
<v Speaker 1>one this day in baseball nineteen seventy seven, in the

0:16:49.760 --> 0:16:52.320
<v Speaker 1>second game of a doubleheader in Boston, Tiger's rookie Lou

0:16:52.320 --> 0:16:54.920
<v Speaker 1>Whitaker and Alan Trammel debut together.

0:16:54.960 --> 0:16:56.360
<v Speaker 2>They will hold down the second base and.

0:16:56.360 --> 0:17:01.600
<v Speaker 1>Short short shortstop jobs in Detroit a record nineteen years.

0:17:01.880 --> 0:17:05.359
<v Speaker 1>And then Taylor Trammel will follow with every person on

0:17:05.400 --> 0:17:08.119
<v Speaker 1>the planet assuming his name is Trammel, and then he

0:17:08.160 --> 0:17:10.640
<v Speaker 1>will have to correct them until he doesn't care anymore

0:17:10.920 --> 0:17:14.639
<v Speaker 1>that it is Trommel. Let's go over to some stat heroes.

0:17:14.680 --> 0:17:18.359
<v Speaker 1>Chris y'all Mancata, as we mentioned, five for six, two homers,

0:17:18.400 --> 0:17:20.320
<v Speaker 1>five RBIs you know there was a trivia question. I

0:17:20.400 --> 0:17:22.800
<v Speaker 1>decided not to put it on there, but it was

0:17:22.880 --> 0:17:25.320
<v Speaker 1>about the last White Sox player.

0:17:25.040 --> 0:17:26.119
<v Speaker 2>To have six hits.

0:17:26.240 --> 0:17:28.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't know why they chose that because Moncotta had five,

0:17:28.960 --> 0:17:31.560
<v Speaker 1>but assuming he goes six for six and not putting

0:17:31.560 --> 0:17:34.400
<v Speaker 1>it on there, but it was Alex Rios who had

0:17:34.440 --> 0:17:36.280
<v Speaker 1>six hits as the last player for the White Sox.

0:17:36.520 --> 0:17:40.440
<v Speaker 1>So Moncatta's performance pretty good in White Sox lareas of recent.

0:17:40.200 --> 0:17:42.040
<v Speaker 2>Alex call four for five with the homer.

0:17:42.200 --> 0:17:44.720
<v Speaker 1>Remy Garcia had a homer, going four for five to

0:17:45.000 --> 0:17:48.680
<v Speaker 1>the hits in Chicago unbelievable. Yatier had two bombs, Miguel

0:17:48.720 --> 0:17:51.480
<v Speaker 1>anu Are had a homer, Seesar Hernandez three for four

0:17:51.840 --> 0:17:55.320
<v Speaker 1>with three three rbi, two runs, Elvis Andres with the homer,

0:17:55.359 --> 0:17:58.159
<v Speaker 1>two RBIs, Brandon Donovan three for three, says Azuki had

0:17:58.200 --> 0:18:00.840
<v Speaker 1>a homer, and Alec Bohm two for four or two rbi.

0:18:01.280 --> 0:18:05.120
<v Speaker 1>Alexandris really has been such a whirlwind of a pickup

0:18:05.160 --> 0:18:06.320
<v Speaker 1>for a lot of teams. I don't know if you

0:18:06.400 --> 0:18:08.280
<v Speaker 1>picked him up anywhere. I've been trying to tout him

0:18:08.280 --> 0:18:10.680
<v Speaker 1>in a couple different spots. He is helping me out

0:18:10.720 --> 0:18:12.160
<v Speaker 1>greatly across a couple leagues.

0:18:13.320 --> 0:18:16.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's crazy. I really didn't pick him up anywhere.

0:18:16.000 --> 0:18:19.000
<v Speaker 3>I didn't think he would be this relevant, but here

0:18:19.040 --> 0:18:22.280
<v Speaker 3>we are, and he's just been extremely good since he

0:18:22.800 --> 0:18:25.520
<v Speaker 3>came over to Chicago and looks like a different player.

0:18:25.520 --> 0:18:28.560
<v Speaker 3>I'm not really sure what happened or what flip switched

0:18:28.600 --> 0:18:32.000
<v Speaker 3>in his head. But he's on it, man, he's been

0:18:32.520 --> 0:18:35.360
<v Speaker 3>absolutely stellar. I was gonna look and see the numbers

0:18:35.400 --> 0:18:39.120
<v Speaker 3>since he's come over two ninety one average, four home

0:18:39.200 --> 0:18:41.760
<v Speaker 3>runs and most of that coming pretty recently over the

0:18:41.840 --> 0:18:45.120
<v Speaker 3>last really since September, since the calendar turn, where he's

0:18:45.119 --> 0:18:47.480
<v Speaker 3>just been really good. Yeah, three thirty three with the

0:18:47.520 --> 0:18:51.360
<v Speaker 3>four home runs since August thirty first, So six nine.

0:18:52.480 --> 0:18:53.119
<v Speaker 2>That's my big thing.

0:18:53.200 --> 0:18:55.119
<v Speaker 1>That's my big thing leading off for the White Sox, Like,

0:18:55.160 --> 0:18:57.040
<v Speaker 1>give me that all day. And there's a couple of

0:18:57.080 --> 0:18:59.399
<v Speaker 1>pickups in there for you guys too. I mean Alex call,

0:18:59.680 --> 0:19:03.119
<v Speaker 1>says Hernandez if he's available. Rennon Donovan continues to just

0:19:03.160 --> 0:19:05.520
<v Speaker 1>like be sneaky across the board. The only other one

0:19:05.520 --> 0:19:07.119
<v Speaker 1>on this I want to ask you about is Suzuki.

0:19:07.200 --> 0:19:09.960
<v Speaker 1>What are your projections on him for next year? It's

0:19:10.000 --> 0:19:13.399
<v Speaker 1>been a so so year. He had that incredible like

0:19:13.760 --> 0:19:16.280
<v Speaker 1>contact rate at the beginning of the year, no chase

0:19:16.320 --> 0:19:18.919
<v Speaker 1>outside the zone. That he got hurt then things kind

0:19:18.960 --> 0:19:21.480
<v Speaker 1>of tempered a bit. Where do you think expected or

0:19:21.520 --> 0:19:24.359
<v Speaker 1>where are expectations going to be for you with say Asuzuki,

0:19:24.359 --> 0:19:25.600
<v Speaker 1>do you think it's just going to be a middle

0:19:25.640 --> 0:19:27.440
<v Speaker 1>line outfielder or do you think he's going to be

0:19:27.480 --> 0:19:28.760
<v Speaker 1>a good bye for next year?

0:19:29.320 --> 0:19:31.159
<v Speaker 3>Well, I think he could be a decent buy And

0:19:31.359 --> 0:19:33.680
<v Speaker 3>people just right off these kind of players so quick

0:19:33.760 --> 0:19:37.160
<v Speaker 3>when the expectations are so high and then they underwhelm

0:19:37.240 --> 0:19:40.199
<v Speaker 3>a bit. I mean, suzuki season's still been solid and

0:19:40.240 --> 0:19:42.959
<v Speaker 3>still putting up good contact numbers and really good end

0:19:43.000 --> 0:19:47.320
<v Speaker 3>zone contact, right and you saw how quickly and obviously

0:19:47.400 --> 0:19:49.359
<v Speaker 3>you look at what Hassion Kim did last year and

0:19:50.240 --> 0:19:52.479
<v Speaker 3>I would say it was not as good as Suzuki's season,

0:19:53.040 --> 0:19:53.960
<v Speaker 3>but he was.

0:19:53.920 --> 0:19:55.040
<v Speaker 2>Just completely written off.

0:19:55.080 --> 0:19:59.119
<v Speaker 3>So when the expectations are high for a player making

0:19:59.119 --> 0:20:01.920
<v Speaker 3>their major league day and they just kind of fall

0:20:01.960 --> 0:20:04.760
<v Speaker 3>off a bit, then it creates a good buying opportunity.

0:20:05.119 --> 0:20:08.480
<v Speaker 2>So Suzuki will be interesting next year. I have zero

0:20:08.560 --> 0:20:09.760
<v Speaker 2>clue where he goes in drafts.

0:20:09.760 --> 0:20:11.320
<v Speaker 3>I'm not even gonna try to guess because it could

0:20:11.359 --> 0:20:15.760
<v Speaker 3>be literally anywhere. But I would speculates a decent buy

0:20:15.760 --> 0:20:16.320
<v Speaker 3>an opportunity.

0:20:16.560 --> 0:20:18.280
<v Speaker 1>He's going to be around like the between the one

0:20:18.400 --> 0:20:20.600
<v Speaker 1>twenties and one fifties. I think that's going to be

0:20:20.640 --> 0:20:23.920
<v Speaker 1>the general sense of where he goes. But I think

0:20:23.960 --> 0:20:25.560
<v Speaker 1>I kind of agree. I like the statement of like,

0:20:25.600 --> 0:20:29.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, the high high thought process about a player,

0:20:29.240 --> 0:20:31.639
<v Speaker 1>they struggle a little bit, creates buying opportunities. And I

0:20:31.680 --> 0:20:34.720
<v Speaker 1>want nothing to do with Spencer Torcalsen this year at all.

0:20:35.080 --> 0:20:36.760
<v Speaker 1>But there's that little part of me that's like if

0:20:36.840 --> 0:20:39.840
<v Speaker 1>someone was in a keeper league dynasty, if someone just

0:20:39.880 --> 0:20:42.000
<v Speaker 1>wanted to get out from under, I'd be tempted to

0:20:42.040 --> 0:20:44.040
<v Speaker 1>re buy just to see if he can pick it

0:20:44.080 --> 0:20:47.600
<v Speaker 1>back up, because the tools are there. It's just, you know,

0:20:47.920 --> 0:20:51.520
<v Speaker 1>the skill set is not applying any of those tools. Unfortunately.

0:20:52.320 --> 0:20:56.480
<v Speaker 1>Over on the pitching heroes, Corbyn Burns, yes, he struck

0:20:56.480 --> 0:20:58.560
<v Speaker 1>out fourteen and eight, but there were some others. Dylan

0:20:58.600 --> 0:21:01.879
<v Speaker 1>c S went six, struck out nine, eight and a half.

0:21:02.040 --> 0:21:04.280
<v Speaker 1>Was that under bet that they liked, did not? I

0:21:04.320 --> 0:21:06.920
<v Speaker 1>would not bet against he got that. He got nine

0:21:06.960 --> 0:21:09.239
<v Speaker 1>on there, only gave up three hits two walks two.

0:21:09.359 --> 0:21:12.000
<v Speaker 1>Maintaining those walks is important to see him for his future.

0:21:12.640 --> 0:21:16.480
<v Speaker 1>Luisesa had eight strikeouts and five and two thirds. Adrian

0:21:16.600 --> 0:21:20.359
<v Speaker 1>Samson struck out only one but went six, gave up

0:21:20.400 --> 0:21:23.160
<v Speaker 1>one earned run, five hits, and Freddy pearlt before getting hurt,

0:21:23.400 --> 0:21:26.480
<v Speaker 1>did go two, struck out three gave up no hits

0:21:26.520 --> 0:21:30.720
<v Speaker 1>before that injury. On the stat Zero's David Vr one

0:21:30.800 --> 0:21:34.479
<v Speaker 1>for seven with five k's in the doubleheader, Bryce Harper,

0:21:34.720 --> 0:21:38.680
<v Speaker 1>Joey Manesis, Glabor Torres, JD. Davis, and Steven Vote all

0:21:38.720 --> 0:21:43.200
<v Speaker 1>over with three k's. Minesis. We just needed that one hit.

0:21:43.480 --> 0:21:45.840
<v Speaker 1>That was that number one prop that betting pros really liked,

0:21:46.320 --> 0:21:48.560
<v Speaker 1>and it was juiced to hell, but it did not

0:21:48.640 --> 0:21:51.480
<v Speaker 1>work out. Over four with three strikeouts on the pitching

0:21:51.520 --> 0:21:54.480
<v Speaker 1>side for the Zero's, JP Sears give up six earned

0:21:54.520 --> 0:21:58.080
<v Speaker 1>runs with two k's, Josiah Gray four earned runs and

0:21:58.119 --> 0:22:01.120
<v Speaker 1>three and one third and Kyle gibbson and four earned

0:22:01.160 --> 0:22:03.879
<v Speaker 1>runs in five he only struck out two. JP Sears

0:22:03.880 --> 0:22:05.720
<v Speaker 1>had a little thing going there for a tiny bit.

0:22:06.040 --> 0:22:10.040
<v Speaker 1>Still might get a rotation spot next year. Those rookie pitchers,

0:22:10.280 --> 0:22:12.800
<v Speaker 1>they've been kind of difficult, especially those out of nowhere guys.

0:22:12.840 --> 0:22:17.640
<v Speaker 1>But the Sears of the world, the the was new

0:22:17.720 --> 0:22:21.440
<v Speaker 1>Skis the I'm got him forgetting Walda Chuck Walder Chuck

0:22:21.480 --> 0:22:23.520
<v Speaker 1>with them. Yeah, the A's have put a couple of

0:22:23.560 --> 0:22:26.440
<v Speaker 1>guys out to out there. Are you interested in any

0:22:26.520 --> 0:22:29.520
<v Speaker 1>of those streamable A's pitchers? And when do just keep.

0:22:29.440 --> 0:22:30.560
<v Speaker 2>By the ways with the Cubs.

0:22:30.960 --> 0:22:34.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Walda, Chuck's interesting. He actually pitched well last time

0:22:34.960 --> 0:22:36.760
<v Speaker 3>he's the Braves. He allowed a couple of long balls.

0:22:36.800 --> 0:22:38.880
<v Speaker 3>He can leave the fastball, you know, over the heart

0:22:38.920 --> 0:22:41.600
<v Speaker 3>of the plate some, but overall his arsenal's pretty good,

0:22:41.640 --> 0:22:43.760
<v Speaker 3>so he's interesting in the right matchup.

0:22:43.880 --> 0:22:46.080
<v Speaker 2>Like obviously, I wouldn't have streamed him against the Braves.

0:22:46.640 --> 0:22:48.879
<v Speaker 3>Hayden was an esky obviously non in a as you said,

0:22:48.880 --> 0:22:51.639
<v Speaker 3>but he's I think he's got good stuff too and

0:22:51.720 --> 0:22:54.920
<v Speaker 3>kind of underrated. So I would prefer both those sears

0:22:54.960 --> 0:22:58.159
<v Speaker 3>down the stretch. But Sears could be interesting in the

0:22:58.240 --> 0:22:59.120
<v Speaker 3>right matchup too.

0:22:59.600 --> 0:23:01.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, not this last one A while to Chuck is

0:23:01.520 --> 0:23:04.320
<v Speaker 1>someone that I really dig I loved him with the Yankees,

0:23:04.359 --> 0:23:06.520
<v Speaker 1>and I love the idea that he has the potential

0:23:06.600 --> 0:23:10.080
<v Speaker 1>to get into the starting rotation. Someone I might try

0:23:10.080 --> 0:23:12.920
<v Speaker 1>to buy really really dirt cheap in Dynasty next year

0:23:12.960 --> 0:23:15.520
<v Speaker 1>for people, just because that's a guy that if he

0:23:15.640 --> 0:23:18.159
<v Speaker 1>were able to start out in the rotation next season,

0:23:18.200 --> 0:23:19.760
<v Speaker 1>He's a guy I think that could put up some

0:23:19.840 --> 0:23:23.480
<v Speaker 1>sneaky sneaky numbers. Good strikeout option go to arsenal of

0:23:23.520 --> 0:23:25.760
<v Speaker 1>pitches A's are not a great team, but that's just

0:23:25.760 --> 0:23:27.280
<v Speaker 1>one of those guys I would take a look at.

0:23:27.520 --> 0:23:29.640
<v Speaker 1>I've been reminding you guys to do this, so hopefully

0:23:29.640 --> 0:23:33.240
<v Speaker 1>you have. But September, Fantasy Pros wants to give you

0:23:33.280 --> 0:23:36.320
<v Speaker 1>an Austin Riley twenty twenty one signed World Series Ball.

0:23:36.359 --> 0:23:39.000
<v Speaker 1>Guess what, Chris Clig is a Braves fan. Look at

0:23:39.000 --> 0:23:42.680
<v Speaker 1>that flag back there. I'm pretty sure you're eligible, Clig.

0:23:42.680 --> 0:23:43.399
<v Speaker 2>Wouldn't you like that?

0:23:43.800 --> 0:23:47.199
<v Speaker 1>All you got is, I'm assuming you're eligible, is you

0:23:47.240 --> 0:23:50.880
<v Speaker 1>got to subscribe, rate and review this podcast. And somebody

0:23:50.920 --> 0:23:52.960
<v Speaker 1>that does that in September is going to win a

0:23:53.119 --> 0:23:57.760
<v Speaker 1>signed World Series Ball from Austin Riley. Pretty good deal,

0:23:57.840 --> 0:23:58.760
<v Speaker 1>pretty big good deal.

0:24:00.160 --> 0:24:02.640
<v Speaker 2>No update as far as a.

0:24:02.600 --> 0:24:05.760
<v Speaker 1>Physical board, unfortunately, so don't shoot the messenger. I did

0:24:05.760 --> 0:24:08.040
<v Speaker 1>not get a new home run board, but I can

0:24:08.080 --> 0:24:10.840
<v Speaker 1>tell you nothing changed as well if I had yesterday.

0:24:10.840 --> 0:24:12.479
<v Speaker 1>If there was a board yesterday, I would share that

0:24:12.560 --> 0:24:16.560
<v Speaker 1>because the top did not change whatsoever. They're literally nothing.

0:24:16.640 --> 0:24:20.359
<v Speaker 1>Nobody hit anything. You still have de bluming Catflock Fox

0:24:20.480 --> 0:24:23.280
<v Speaker 1>in the lead. At forty nine. They both had some

0:24:23.320 --> 0:24:25.920
<v Speaker 1>Cardinals guys Eronado and Schmidt. He has a gold Shmate Yesterday,

0:24:26.000 --> 0:24:29.000
<v Speaker 1>Elskel and high Cove. You're tied at forty eight. Go

0:24:29.160 --> 0:24:32.760
<v Speaker 1>cards at forty seven. It's a tight, tight race. You

0:24:32.760 --> 0:24:34.920
<v Speaker 1>guys got to get some homers. Joey p still on there,

0:24:34.960 --> 0:24:37.960
<v Speaker 1>Mike Mayer's still on there. So home run contest getting

0:24:38.160 --> 0:24:41.439
<v Speaker 1>pretty pretty crazy. I've got some props for you, and

0:24:41.520 --> 0:24:44.239
<v Speaker 1>of course, oh I can't find it. Here we go

0:24:45.080 --> 0:24:49.600
<v Speaker 1>with our friends over at bet MGM. Yes, I wear

0:24:49.680 --> 0:24:52.359
<v Speaker 1>tiaras for bet MGM. If I had a crown, I

0:24:52.359 --> 0:24:55.920
<v Speaker 1>would do that, but unfortunately this is my bit now. Yes,

0:24:56.080 --> 0:24:59.160
<v Speaker 1>bet MGM used the promo code leading off, You guys

0:24:59.160 --> 0:25:01.159
<v Speaker 1>are gonna get hooked up with a one thousand dollars

0:25:01.320 --> 0:25:04.800
<v Speaker 1>risk free first bet. When you do it, you bet

0:25:04.960 --> 0:25:07.639
<v Speaker 1>MGM also has a whole lot of other cool stuff

0:25:07.640 --> 0:25:10.120
<v Speaker 1>they do with they throwing out free bets and promotions.

0:25:10.440 --> 0:25:11.080
<v Speaker 2>I just got.

0:25:12.160 --> 0:25:15.080
<v Speaker 1>I had a deposit promotion that I just put down

0:25:15.200 --> 0:25:17.159
<v Speaker 1>and I've already gotten two free bets out of it

0:25:17.200 --> 0:25:18.800
<v Speaker 1>that they were putting out. So go and check them

0:25:18.800 --> 0:25:22.600
<v Speaker 1>out today. Leading office of promo code, bet MGM. Make

0:25:22.680 --> 0:25:24.720
<v Speaker 1>some fun bets and maybe one of these bets we're

0:25:24.760 --> 0:25:26.800
<v Speaker 1>going to do. You're going to dig. Here's a couple

0:25:26.840 --> 0:25:28.399
<v Speaker 1>of props. You guys know the deal of how I

0:25:28.440 --> 0:25:30.440
<v Speaker 1>do them. I'm going to give you two strikeout, give

0:25:30.440 --> 0:25:33.520
<v Speaker 1>you two hitters. One's the top play with juice. One

0:25:33.640 --> 0:25:37.080
<v Speaker 1>is the plus play, and the two pitching ones. We've

0:25:37.080 --> 0:25:41.960
<v Speaker 1>got Jason Alexander Seinfeld Cincinnati at Milwaukee two and a

0:25:42.000 --> 0:25:46.200
<v Speaker 1>half strikeouts. Projection is four. It's minus one seventy five

0:25:46.240 --> 0:25:48.439
<v Speaker 1>on DK, so it is lots of juice, but you

0:25:48.480 --> 0:25:51.639
<v Speaker 1>only need three strikeouts. The plus play for K's is

0:25:51.720 --> 0:25:54.640
<v Speaker 1>Lucas Giolito today. It's at five and a half. He's

0:25:54.640 --> 0:25:57.800
<v Speaker 1>projected at six point seven. It's against the A's. That's

0:25:57.960 --> 0:26:02.199
<v Speaker 1>plus money one ten fan duel for the hitting side.

0:26:02.320 --> 0:26:05.640
<v Speaker 1>Dermous Garcia is back and guess what. Dermous Garcia yesterday

0:26:05.720 --> 0:26:08.600
<v Speaker 1>was plus money to get one hit and it cashed.

0:26:08.720 --> 0:26:11.560
<v Speaker 1>He got it. It's minus one twenty today on DK,

0:26:11.840 --> 0:26:14.360
<v Speaker 1>but you only need one total base and then Christian

0:26:14.400 --> 0:26:17.040
<v Speaker 1>Walker is your plus money play. It's at Sugar House

0:26:17.040 --> 0:26:21.119
<v Speaker 1>plus one oh five for two total bases against Colorado

0:26:22.040 --> 0:26:24.199
<v Speaker 1>in Colorado, so I kind of can dig that.

0:26:24.720 --> 0:26:26.240
<v Speaker 2>So gleg, what do you dig here?

0:26:26.240 --> 0:26:30.320
<v Speaker 1>You got Jason Alexander three strikeouts, Giulito six, you've got

0:26:30.320 --> 0:26:33.439
<v Speaker 1>dermos Garcia for essentially one hit, or Christian Walker with

0:26:33.560 --> 0:26:36.080
<v Speaker 1>two total bases that could be his one homer.

0:26:36.600 --> 0:26:40.000
<v Speaker 3>Any of these you like or multiple? I like both

0:26:40.040 --> 0:26:43.560
<v Speaker 3>the plus bets. I like Giolito to get six k's

0:26:43.640 --> 0:26:47.520
<v Speaker 3>or more. He's been pretty bad. There's not much other

0:26:47.560 --> 0:26:51.800
<v Speaker 3>way to put it. But against Oakland, I do like

0:26:51.840 --> 0:26:55.840
<v Speaker 3>the matchup, and I could see him easily breaking six.

0:26:56.320 --> 0:26:58.359
<v Speaker 3>I like Walker as well. I feel good about Walker's

0:26:58.440 --> 0:27:02.200
<v Speaker 3>chances to get two backs, whether it be two hits

0:27:02.320 --> 0:27:05.800
<v Speaker 3>or a double home run, whatever it be. I mean,

0:27:05.960 --> 0:27:08.879
<v Speaker 3>Walker's been swinging an extremely hot bat and Ethilm in

0:27:08.960 --> 0:27:12.560
<v Speaker 3>course field. There's not much better matchup there. So I

0:27:12.680 --> 0:27:13.840
<v Speaker 3>like both those bets.

0:27:14.200 --> 0:27:16.199
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and I don't blame anybody that got into that

0:27:16.280 --> 0:27:20.440
<v Speaker 1>space of dropping Gilido. It's so shocking how bad it's been.

0:27:20.920 --> 0:27:24.240
<v Speaker 1>But this is a pretty good matchup. He's not lighting

0:27:24.240 --> 0:27:26.639
<v Speaker 1>it up on strikeouts, but he's got a pretty weird

0:27:26.760 --> 0:27:30.000
<v Speaker 1>like almost every other of five to seven strikeouts, there's

0:27:30.040 --> 0:27:33.640
<v Speaker 1>one anomaly in there, but it's like the second of August, seventh,

0:27:33.960 --> 0:27:39.440
<v Speaker 1>the seventh, fifth, the thirteenth, seventh, the eighteenth, five, you know,

0:27:39.480 --> 0:27:44.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean the thirtieth seven five. We're up to the seventh,

0:27:44.080 --> 0:27:45.440
<v Speaker 1>so this is a good marker. I kind of like

0:27:45.520 --> 0:27:47.919
<v Speaker 1>the strikeouts if you want to play that game. Lucas

0:27:47.880 --> 0:27:51.680
<v Speaker 1>Gilido been just like a massive, massive disappointment. Jim's got

0:27:51.680 --> 0:27:53.879
<v Speaker 1>a couple for us too, liking VA three and a

0:27:53.920 --> 0:27:58.120
<v Speaker 1>half strikeouts. I very much like that one and Brandon Bayo.

0:27:58.160 --> 0:27:59.600
<v Speaker 1>I have every went on the Bio one, but I

0:27:59.640 --> 0:28:01.800
<v Speaker 1>like the Vatha is actually kind of think sneaky a

0:28:01.800 --> 0:28:04.520
<v Speaker 1>little bit today, And remember these the ones I'm giving

0:28:04.520 --> 0:28:07.439
<v Speaker 1>you here. This is from bettingpros dot com the mlbprop

0:28:07.560 --> 0:28:10.320
<v Speaker 1>cheat sheet. This isn't necessarily me picking apart a whole

0:28:10.359 --> 0:28:12.600
<v Speaker 1>bunch of them, but giving you what the top of

0:28:12.640 --> 0:28:15.040
<v Speaker 1>their algorithm says and then what the plus money is.

0:28:15.160 --> 0:28:16.760
<v Speaker 1>But it is a really cool tool that you guys

0:28:16.760 --> 0:28:18.399
<v Speaker 1>can go and check out to see what the algorithms

0:28:18.440 --> 0:28:20.800
<v Speaker 1>bits out and then maybe you guys can figure out

0:28:20.800 --> 0:28:24.360
<v Speaker 1>some of your decisions as far as those go. On

0:28:24.640 --> 0:28:28.240
<v Speaker 1>the DFS side, Miles Michaelis is at ten on fandle

0:28:28.440 --> 0:28:31.160
<v Speaker 1>Lance mccollers eight eight, Lucas Gilido is eight to two,

0:28:31.600 --> 0:28:34.440
<v Speaker 1>and Austin Vatha even put on there is six six

0:28:34.560 --> 0:28:36.359
<v Speaker 1>if you guys want to get crazy. Even though that's

0:28:36.400 --> 0:28:41.080
<v Speaker 1>a single pitcher platform DK DK, you're gonna have two.

0:28:41.200 --> 0:28:43.080
<v Speaker 1>The prices really aren't out there, but I can tell

0:28:43.120 --> 0:28:46.320
<v Speaker 1>you Michaelis was like eight eight I think over there,

0:28:46.360 --> 0:28:50.240
<v Speaker 1>so that's a pretty big difference. Implied run totals. Arizona

0:28:50.320 --> 0:28:53.800
<v Speaker 1>and Colorado both projected over five, as is Philly, So

0:28:53.800 --> 0:28:55.840
<v Speaker 1>if you want to build some lineups around those guys,

0:28:55.880 --> 0:28:58.720
<v Speaker 1>I think Colorado is a good Colorado and Arizona's a

0:28:58.720 --> 0:29:01.240
<v Speaker 1>good shot. Her Man Marquez play well at home, so

0:29:01.320 --> 0:29:03.200
<v Speaker 1>you gotta be careful. But both of those would be

0:29:03.880 --> 0:29:06.719
<v Speaker 1>relatively solid bets if you want to do it. And finally,

0:29:06.720 --> 0:29:08.920
<v Speaker 1>it takes us to the home run call, Chris Clegg,

0:29:09.000 --> 0:29:11.400
<v Speaker 1>who do you think is dropping a big fly today?

0:29:12.960 --> 0:29:16.320
<v Speaker 3>You know, it seems to be the common choice, but

0:29:16.440 --> 0:29:18.480
<v Speaker 3>I'm gonna go with Aaron Judge. I think he's just

0:29:19.120 --> 0:29:22.920
<v Speaker 3>he's due again, He's chasing the record, so I feel

0:29:22.920 --> 0:29:28.480
<v Speaker 3>good about Judge's chances tonight facing Drew Rasmussen. I like

0:29:28.560 --> 0:29:31.960
<v Speaker 3>to pick there with Judge. So maybe a popular one,

0:29:32.000 --> 0:29:33.200
<v Speaker 3>but that's my call for that.

0:29:33.320 --> 0:29:36.080
<v Speaker 2>I am yeah, do you think it's popular in Clegg.

0:29:36.080 --> 0:29:38.040
<v Speaker 2>Do you think Aaron Judge by a popular one?

0:29:38.080 --> 0:29:43.240
<v Speaker 1>Maybe? I mean just possibly you and Joey Well funny enough,

0:29:43.880 --> 0:29:46.400
<v Speaker 1>Mike Mayor's got Rhez Hoskins. And that was my first

0:29:46.440 --> 0:29:48.280
<v Speaker 1>one that I was gonna go to. And then I'm like, okay,

0:29:48.280 --> 0:29:50.840
<v Speaker 1>I'll just move off. And then I went to Bobachett

0:29:50.880 --> 0:29:52.719
<v Speaker 1>and I saw Wonky at Bobachett and I'm like, all right,

0:29:52.720 --> 0:29:55.360
<v Speaker 1>I can't every guy that I have my gut call on,

0:29:55.440 --> 0:29:57.200
<v Speaker 1>I can't just move off of because they have it.

0:29:57.240 --> 0:29:59.640
<v Speaker 1>So I'm gonna ride with Wonky. I'm riding with Wonky

0:29:59.720 --> 0:30:03.360
<v Speaker 1>or you for this Friday. I'm going with Bobaschett. Mike

0:30:03.400 --> 0:30:06.160
<v Speaker 1>Mayer's got Rehys Hoskins. And as he points out, even

0:30:06.240 --> 0:30:09.160
<v Speaker 1>though Patrick Corbin is super good now, Mike Mayers sent

0:30:09.280 --> 0:30:14.640
<v Speaker 1>us that horrifically terrifying tweet of how good Corbyn's been.

0:30:14.480 --> 0:30:15.360
<v Speaker 2>Over three starts.

0:30:16.080 --> 0:30:20.000
<v Speaker 1>Nope, Big Old Jordan Peel, Nope, I will not do it.

0:30:20.040 --> 0:30:21.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't even care if he's good or not. I

0:30:21.640 --> 0:30:24.320
<v Speaker 1>will still bet against him. I'm not doing that thing

0:30:24.400 --> 0:30:29.400
<v Speaker 1>with Patrick Corbin. No chance, no way, new way. Chris

0:30:29.440 --> 0:30:32.160
<v Speaker 1>clig on Twitter at Rode o'klegg. What's going down for

0:30:32.160 --> 0:30:32.680
<v Speaker 1>you right now?

0:30:33.560 --> 0:30:35.800
<v Speaker 2>I much just grinding out the end of the season.

0:30:35.880 --> 0:30:38.520
<v Speaker 3>You know, high minor league balls ending this week, so

0:30:39.120 --> 0:30:41.280
<v Speaker 3>be out a couple of games this weekend, get some

0:30:41.320 --> 0:30:44.560
<v Speaker 3>final looks before sadly the minor league season ends, and

0:30:45.320 --> 0:30:48.560
<v Speaker 3>just grinding the regular season content for fantasy and you

0:30:48.600 --> 0:30:50.680
<v Speaker 3>can find that over at Fantasy Pros or fan tracks

0:30:50.720 --> 0:30:53.360
<v Speaker 3>and the tool Shed podcast as well. So a lot

0:30:53.400 --> 0:30:56.560
<v Speaker 3>of prospect dynasty coverage quick grades will be out if

0:30:56.560 --> 0:30:59.320
<v Speaker 3>they're not out already by tomorrow morning for next week

0:30:59.360 --> 0:31:01.960
<v Speaker 3>for hitters. So that's uh, that's what's kind of on

0:31:02.000 --> 0:31:02.360
<v Speaker 3>the docket.

0:31:02.400 --> 0:31:06.600
<v Speaker 1>Man, Just go. It's hard doing the thing. Wonky said,

0:31:06.760 --> 0:31:08.920
<v Speaker 1>she's got a sidecar for me. I really should have

0:31:09.040 --> 0:31:11.800
<v Speaker 1>like matched See this is how much better does this look?

0:31:11.840 --> 0:31:13.440
<v Speaker 2>The color? This is the matching color.

0:31:13.680 --> 0:31:16.360
<v Speaker 1>Wonky said, it's okay that I'm riding. She's got a

0:31:16.400 --> 0:31:19.640
<v Speaker 1>really cool sidecar for the scooter you can ride. Tierra required.

0:31:19.920 --> 0:31:22.320
<v Speaker 2>However, Tierra required, Well.

0:31:22.120 --> 0:31:24.240
<v Speaker 1>Friends, I'm going to take my Tiara and I'm going

0:31:24.320 --> 0:31:26.400
<v Speaker 1>to get out of here for the week. We are

0:31:26.440 --> 0:31:28.760
<v Speaker 1>back next week, yes, the same time. As far as

0:31:28.800 --> 0:31:30.320
<v Speaker 1>the live stream come and hang out with us. By

0:31:30.320 --> 0:31:31.880
<v Speaker 1>the way, and if you guys are listening on the

0:31:31.880 --> 0:31:34.440
<v Speaker 1>podcast and you guys are just ending out, we are

0:31:34.480 --> 0:31:37.320
<v Speaker 1>still talking baseball. We are still rocking with you. Yes,

0:31:37.320 --> 0:31:39.880
<v Speaker 1>football is going, but we are not stopping with it.

0:31:40.000 --> 0:31:41.360
<v Speaker 1>Come hang out in the live stream. We got a

0:31:41.440 --> 0:31:44.480
<v Speaker 1>killer community, killer set of people, funny stuff. We had

0:31:44.800 --> 0:31:45.280
<v Speaker 1>a pulk.

0:31:45.720 --> 0:31:47.400
<v Speaker 2>It was a trivia question that was in there.

0:31:47.560 --> 0:31:49.200
<v Speaker 1>You guys should come and hang out, Come hang out

0:31:49.240 --> 0:31:51.680
<v Speaker 1>with us, and maybe next week we will make it

0:31:51.720 --> 0:31:54.640
<v Speaker 1>maybe a listener question week. I think I was thinking

0:31:54.680 --> 0:31:57.360
<v Speaker 1>maybe every person that we have on we will take

0:31:57.400 --> 0:31:59.400
<v Speaker 1>a little dedicated time and answer some of your guys's

0:31:59.440 --> 0:32:02.840
<v Speaker 1>questions live on the show. As it's playoff time, all

0:32:02.880 --> 0:32:05.640
<v Speaker 1>playoffs should be intact next week, so let's do it.

0:32:05.680 --> 0:32:07.360
<v Speaker 1>You can find me on Twitter at is it the Welsh.

0:32:07.480 --> 0:32:09.320
<v Speaker 1>All the other stuff I do is there as well.

0:32:09.360 --> 0:32:12.120
<v Speaker 1>We've got a baseball podcast breakdown. I do do some

0:32:12.120 --> 0:32:14.480
<v Speaker 1>other football stuff that you'll see and coming up in

0:32:14.520 --> 0:32:17.880
<v Speaker 1>the future. Prospect update, dynasty update, and early look at

0:32:17.880 --> 0:32:19.920
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty three redraft ranks in this league.

0:32:19.920 --> 0:32:21.959
<v Speaker 2>Dot Com Friends, I'm.

0:32:21.400 --> 0:32:25.480
<v Speaker 1>Out, Plague isn't out. You're out, Go win your playoffs.

0:32:25.600 --> 0:32:28.080
<v Speaker 1>Stream some good pictures, get some guys. I'll see you

0:32:28.080 --> 0:32:28.480
<v Speaker 1>next time.

0:32:28.680 --> 0:32:28.960
<v Speaker 3>Peace,