WEBVTT - SYSK Selects: All We Know About Guessing

0:00:00.200 --> 0:00:03.159
<v Speaker 1>Hi, everyone, it's your pal Josh. And for this week's

0:00:03.240 --> 0:00:06.080
<v Speaker 1>s Y s K Selects, I've chosen How Guessing Works.

0:00:06.400 --> 0:00:08.520
<v Speaker 1>It was one of those great ideas for a topic

0:00:08.800 --> 0:00:11.760
<v Speaker 1>that didn't pan out to have much information on it actually,

0:00:12.160 --> 0:00:15.160
<v Speaker 1>so we just talked a lot about subjective stuff instead,

0:00:15.680 --> 0:00:18.360
<v Speaker 1>and it turned out well, I think in the end.

0:00:18.400 --> 0:00:25.079
<v Speaker 1>If I may say so, I hope you enjoy Welcome

0:00:25.120 --> 0:00:27.360
<v Speaker 1>to Stuff you should know, a production of my Heart

0:00:27.440 --> 0:00:37.680
<v Speaker 1>Radios How Stuff Works. Hello, and welcome to the podcast.

0:00:38.080 --> 0:00:41.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm Josh Clark. There's Charles w Chuck Bryant. Jerry's over

0:00:41.680 --> 0:00:44.839
<v Speaker 1>there in the corner. Everybody puts Jerry in a corner,

0:00:46.159 --> 0:00:48.920
<v Speaker 1>but you shouldn't, uh, and this is stuff you should not.

0:00:49.320 --> 0:00:52.760
<v Speaker 1>She's the opposite of baby. Jerry's back. She was back

0:00:52.760 --> 0:00:56.440
<v Speaker 1>from the mall. That's how where she's been. Yeah, I

0:00:56.520 --> 0:00:59.120
<v Speaker 1>remember we we said that she was at the mall.

0:00:59.240 --> 0:01:01.400
<v Speaker 1>She was buying a how she's doing all sorts of stuff.

0:01:02.880 --> 0:01:05.720
<v Speaker 1>But she's back now and things are normal again. Yeah,

0:01:05.800 --> 0:01:08.960
<v Speaker 1>she was at the beach and she's now eating in

0:01:09.040 --> 0:01:11.760
<v Speaker 1>front of me. What I ate about an hour ago?

0:01:12.480 --> 0:01:14.440
<v Speaker 1>Do you want to throw up? Or do you want more?

0:01:14.600 --> 0:01:18.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't it's it's this weird in between. I'm drawn

0:01:18.040 --> 0:01:20.399
<v Speaker 1>to the smell, but I'm also full, so I'm kind

0:01:20.400 --> 0:01:25.600
<v Speaker 1>of like boo, yeah, oh man, what a life? I know?

0:01:26.080 --> 0:01:30.360
<v Speaker 1>Eating Who needs it? Right? Me? I do too? I

0:01:30.440 --> 0:01:34.360
<v Speaker 1>love eating, love it? You know what else? I love? What?

0:01:35.240 --> 0:01:44.400
<v Speaker 1>Really good? Magic? Like illusions? Well where does uh? What

0:01:44.680 --> 0:01:46.960
<v Speaker 1>do you mean? Because that could mean two different things. Well,

0:01:47.040 --> 0:01:49.480
<v Speaker 1>let me tell you, um, so I went you mean,

0:01:49.480 --> 0:01:51.760
<v Speaker 1>and I went to New York recently we saw this show.

0:01:52.400 --> 0:01:55.600
<v Speaker 1>It's called in and of itself. It's a one man

0:01:56.160 --> 0:01:59.840
<v Speaker 1>stage magic I guess you could call it that illusion

0:02:00.240 --> 0:02:03.200
<v Speaker 1>show by a guy named Derek del Guadio. That's how

0:02:03.240 --> 0:02:05.920
<v Speaker 1>you say his last name. I strongly recommend anyone go

0:02:06.040 --> 0:02:08.800
<v Speaker 1>see this show. It's it's um I think they extended

0:02:08.840 --> 0:02:12.919
<v Speaker 1>it through the rest of the year, but it's it's

0:02:12.960 --> 0:02:16.000
<v Speaker 1>like kind of his life story. It told like through

0:02:16.040 --> 0:02:20.160
<v Speaker 1>these different um these different acts, and like just the

0:02:20.160 --> 0:02:22.520
<v Speaker 1>the stuff he's doing is not like, oh man, that

0:02:22.639 --> 0:02:25.040
<v Speaker 1>rabbit came out of nowhere, nothing like that. It's all

0:02:25.280 --> 0:02:29.800
<v Speaker 1>much more psychological than that. But the basis of it

0:02:29.880 --> 0:02:33.120
<v Speaker 1>is that this guy must be just one of the

0:02:33.120 --> 0:02:36.440
<v Speaker 1>better guesters walking around today. He's just good. He's also

0:02:36.560 --> 0:02:38.600
<v Speaker 1>like a card shark. It's just a really neat show.

0:02:38.639 --> 0:02:42.760
<v Speaker 1>It's really original and different. But just to see somebody

0:02:42.840 --> 0:02:47.400
<v Speaker 1>do something to where they probably are guessing, but they're

0:02:47.440 --> 0:02:49.799
<v Speaker 1>doing such an amazing job at it that it just

0:02:50.000 --> 0:02:52.720
<v Speaker 1>appears to be magic. That's one of my favorite things

0:02:52.720 --> 0:02:55.800
<v Speaker 1>in the world to see, Like when he talks to

0:02:55.880 --> 0:02:59.280
<v Speaker 1>people and like think of a number except obviously more

0:02:59.320 --> 0:03:01.480
<v Speaker 1>fun and complex and that. Yes, yeah, and I don't

0:03:01.480 --> 0:03:03.080
<v Speaker 1>want to give any of it away. I don't want

0:03:03.080 --> 0:03:04.600
<v Speaker 1>to give it any bit of it away. Like for

0:03:04.680 --> 0:03:07.119
<v Speaker 1>anybody who's gonna go see it, everyone should go into

0:03:07.160 --> 0:03:10.880
<v Speaker 1>it fresh. But um, but yeah, just just after you

0:03:10.919 --> 0:03:14.240
<v Speaker 1>see it, go back and listen to this episode again

0:03:14.360 --> 0:03:16.840
<v Speaker 1>and you'll be like, oh, yeah, totally now. I think

0:03:16.880 --> 0:03:19.680
<v Speaker 1>the deal a lot of times with that situation is

0:03:20.120 --> 0:03:25.640
<v Speaker 1>powers of suggestion, correct. I don't know. I don't know, man,

0:03:26.200 --> 0:03:28.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if that's what this guy's doing or not. No,

0:03:28.600 --> 0:03:30.840
<v Speaker 1>he's not doing like cold readings or something like that

0:03:30.880 --> 0:03:33.720
<v Speaker 1>like John Edwards. No, no, no, nothing like that. But

0:03:33.800 --> 0:03:36.839
<v Speaker 1>powers of suggestion in that if you you can lead

0:03:36.880 --> 0:03:40.440
<v Speaker 1>someone to to think of a certain thing that they

0:03:40.480 --> 0:03:46.880
<v Speaker 1>then guess I guess, so get it didn't even mean that,

0:03:47.240 --> 0:03:50.200
<v Speaker 1>but that kind of dives into what we're talking about,

0:03:50.200 --> 0:03:55.080
<v Speaker 1>which is guessing in general. Um, there's this whole like

0:03:55.080 --> 0:03:58.720
<v Speaker 1>like science really doesn't have any idea about how we

0:03:58.800 --> 0:04:02.760
<v Speaker 1>make guesses. All we know is that we are capable

0:04:02.760 --> 0:04:06.640
<v Speaker 1>of making guesses, and that we make guesses almost constantly,

0:04:07.040 --> 0:04:09.480
<v Speaker 1>and that like our our brain is basically set up

0:04:09.520 --> 0:04:13.200
<v Speaker 1>to guests, Like our construction of reality is a series

0:04:13.240 --> 0:04:15.880
<v Speaker 1>of guesses, most of which pan out to be right,

0:04:16.200 --> 0:04:19.080
<v Speaker 1>but then can also be terribly wrong, which is what

0:04:19.200 --> 0:04:23.760
<v Speaker 1>optical illusions prove, you know. Yeah, and uh, I found this.

0:04:24.200 --> 0:04:25.760
<v Speaker 1>I thought it was going to be more interesting than

0:04:25.800 --> 0:04:29.000
<v Speaker 1>it was initially when I picked this one out, so

0:04:29.040 --> 0:04:31.719
<v Speaker 1>I was a little disappointed. And then we found like

0:04:31.960 --> 0:04:34.880
<v Speaker 1>other supplemental stuff that kind of helped it. But in

0:04:34.920 --> 0:04:38.520
<v Speaker 1>the end it felt a little unwieldy. But I think

0:04:38.600 --> 0:04:41.080
<v Speaker 1>that's just because of the nature of the topic, Like

0:04:41.560 --> 0:04:45.880
<v Speaker 1>there isn't a concise beginning, middle, and end to this

0:04:45.960 --> 0:04:49.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of topic, you know, no, because again science is

0:04:49.760 --> 0:04:54.200
<v Speaker 1>pretty well stumped, like even and sometimes Chuck, if you'll remember,

0:04:54.279 --> 0:04:57.279
<v Speaker 1>these can be our best episodes, like unless the ones

0:04:57.279 --> 0:05:01.440
<v Speaker 1>where there's just like a clear cut, complete, understandable, neat

0:05:01.520 --> 0:05:04.359
<v Speaker 1>explanation ones are great, and then on the other end

0:05:04.400 --> 0:05:06.839
<v Speaker 1>of the spectrum, like this one, were the ones where

0:05:06.880 --> 0:05:09.720
<v Speaker 1>science is just kind of like maybe this is it.

0:05:09.760 --> 0:05:12.119
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, this could be it. Those are usually

0:05:12.160 --> 0:05:16.800
<v Speaker 1>pretty good too, So this could this one has has potential. Alright,

0:05:16.839 --> 0:05:19.440
<v Speaker 1>that's my that's my estimation. Well, I thought it was

0:05:19.520 --> 0:05:22.200
<v Speaker 1>interesting that in our very own house Stuff Works article

0:05:22.360 --> 0:05:26.680
<v Speaker 1>and they started talking about um the in days of

0:05:26.760 --> 0:05:31.480
<v Speaker 1>yore with starting with took took and you know, basically

0:05:31.560 --> 0:05:35.159
<v Speaker 1>up until the point where we could like you know,

0:05:35.240 --> 0:05:37.520
<v Speaker 1>measure things or prove things, like, there was a lot

0:05:37.600 --> 0:05:39.400
<v Speaker 1>of and there's still a lot of guessing going on,

0:05:39.480 --> 0:05:44.680
<v Speaker 1>but like guessing was a daily survival tactic, right, Like

0:05:44.800 --> 0:05:46.640
<v Speaker 1>that's how that's how we learned. Should I go this

0:05:46.680 --> 0:05:49.279
<v Speaker 1>way and fall off a cliff? You know, I'm going

0:05:49.320 --> 0:05:51.440
<v Speaker 1>to take a guess? Or should I eat this thing?

0:05:51.880 --> 0:05:54.760
<v Speaker 1>Will it kill me? Or like in the case of

0:05:54.839 --> 0:05:59.159
<v Speaker 1>Lewis and Clark, I remember, um, Clark estimated and you

0:05:59.200 --> 0:06:02.240
<v Speaker 1>know they're guesses, and we'll get into different types of

0:06:02.279 --> 0:06:04.680
<v Speaker 1>an estimation is a kind of a guess, even if

0:06:04.720 --> 0:06:09.239
<v Speaker 1>it's informed and well reasoned. In Clark's case, of course,

0:06:09.240 --> 0:06:12.640
<v Speaker 1>he estimated. I think he's only off about forty miles

0:06:12.680 --> 0:06:16.080
<v Speaker 1>when they got to the Pacific. Uh. Oh really, I

0:06:16.120 --> 0:06:19.000
<v Speaker 1>don't remember that. Yeah, he he estimated four thousand, one

0:06:19.480 --> 0:06:23.160
<v Speaker 1>sixty two miles when he's off by forty I mean

0:06:23.200 --> 0:06:27.640
<v Speaker 1>that's remarkable. Yeah, but it wasn't a wild guess. It

0:06:27.680 --> 0:06:31.000
<v Speaker 1>was Clark being a very smart dude who probably took

0:06:31.040 --> 0:06:35.520
<v Speaker 1>copious notes. Not probably, he definitely took copious notes. Um,

0:06:35.560 --> 0:06:37.000
<v Speaker 1>but I don't know. I just never really thought about

0:06:37.040 --> 0:06:40.400
<v Speaker 1>guessing back in those days. Could you know you could?

0:06:40.440 --> 0:06:42.760
<v Speaker 1>You could end up a bad guest means the end

0:06:42.800 --> 0:06:46.039
<v Speaker 1>of view, Yes, But if your friends were standing around

0:06:46.040 --> 0:06:51.400
<v Speaker 1>watching you guess that that um lizard over there wasn't poisonous,

0:06:51.520 --> 0:06:53.279
<v Speaker 1>you can just go ahead and eat it raw and

0:06:53.279 --> 0:06:56.120
<v Speaker 1>then you keel over and die, they learned from your

0:06:56.160 --> 0:06:59.680
<v Speaker 1>bad guests taking one for the team very much. So yeah,

0:07:00.080 --> 0:07:04.560
<v Speaker 1>that's before the universal edibility test. Man, you were just

0:07:05.000 --> 0:07:07.839
<v Speaker 1>have you been going through the archives or something? No,

0:07:08.400 --> 0:07:11.120
<v Speaker 1>but I wrote that article back then, so that one

0:07:11.160 --> 0:07:14.240
<v Speaker 1>stuck with me because you know, I mean, we're I

0:07:14.280 --> 0:07:17.920
<v Speaker 1>thought you were too. I'm cursed with that new information

0:07:17.960 --> 0:07:23.240
<v Speaker 1>in old information getting squeezed out. Yeah, yeah, yeah, So

0:07:23.280 --> 0:07:26.120
<v Speaker 1>should we get into this I guess, So, I'm not

0:07:26.280 --> 0:07:28.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't mean to do this. I'm sorry what saying

0:07:28.800 --> 0:07:33.000
<v Speaker 1>I guess? Yeah, it's pretty commonplace, but it does kind

0:07:33.040 --> 0:07:35.880
<v Speaker 1>of under underscore just how much we do guess in

0:07:35.880 --> 0:07:38.280
<v Speaker 1>our lives. You know. Yeah, here's all right, let's go

0:07:38.320 --> 0:07:40.360
<v Speaker 1>ahead and start it with the brain then, because while

0:07:40.400 --> 0:07:43.280
<v Speaker 1>you're correct in saying that they don't know the the

0:07:43.360 --> 0:07:48.600
<v Speaker 1>pathways necessarily of a guess, um, all different kinds of

0:07:49.040 --> 0:07:51.679
<v Speaker 1>all different parts of the brain, not all the parts,

0:07:51.680 --> 0:07:53.840
<v Speaker 1>but many different parts of the brain are at work,

0:07:54.520 --> 0:07:56.520
<v Speaker 1>which makes a lot of sense when you think about

0:07:57.160 --> 0:08:00.880
<v Speaker 1>what different kinds of guesses can al, whether you're guessing

0:08:00.920 --> 0:08:04.840
<v Speaker 1>someone's age or guessing you know, because that involves like,

0:08:05.560 --> 0:08:09.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, recognition with your eyeballs or a memory of

0:08:10.480 --> 0:08:12.760
<v Speaker 1>someone else who was a certain age who looked like

0:08:12.800 --> 0:08:16.480
<v Speaker 1>that like you're you know, recall, Uh, there's all different

0:08:16.480 --> 0:08:19.040
<v Speaker 1>parts of the brain that are lighting up whenever you're

0:08:19.080 --> 0:08:22.840
<v Speaker 1>guessing something. Yeah, they they think that it's a global,

0:08:23.560 --> 0:08:27.840
<v Speaker 1>a global phenomenon, right, like brain brain a lely global Yes,

0:08:27.880 --> 0:08:31.960
<v Speaker 1>exactly right. So, um, there's like some region of your

0:08:31.960 --> 0:08:35.439
<v Speaker 1>brain that specializes in the particular task at hand. The

0:08:36.000 --> 0:08:38.920
<v Speaker 1>thing you're guessing about, whether it's say, like volume or

0:08:39.280 --> 0:08:42.520
<v Speaker 1>like you said, someone's age. UM, that region of the

0:08:42.559 --> 0:08:45.560
<v Speaker 1>brain that that has to do with say numbers, UM

0:08:45.679 --> 0:08:49.760
<v Speaker 1>would light up. I think it's the um parietal uh

0:08:49.960 --> 0:08:52.760
<v Speaker 1>anterior gyrus or something like that that lights up when

0:08:52.760 --> 0:08:55.520
<v Speaker 1>you're trying to guess someone's age based on how they look.

0:08:56.400 --> 0:08:59.120
<v Speaker 1>But then that that's just one I think right using

0:08:59.120 --> 0:09:04.880
<v Speaker 1>the Wonder Machine night. But that's just one functional part

0:09:05.280 --> 0:09:08.040
<v Speaker 1>of the whole process that the brain is going through.

0:09:08.080 --> 0:09:11.920
<v Speaker 1>They know that it's there's a number of different regions

0:09:11.960 --> 0:09:16.200
<v Speaker 1>that are operating at any given point in time when

0:09:16.200 --> 0:09:19.679
<v Speaker 1>you're making a guess, But they still can't say, well,

0:09:20.040 --> 0:09:22.439
<v Speaker 1>if somebody's guessing this, this is what's going to happen.

0:09:22.480 --> 0:09:24.719
<v Speaker 1>Here's the here's the cascade that's going to go through

0:09:24.720 --> 0:09:27.120
<v Speaker 1>the brain. We haven't reached that point yet. Yeah, they

0:09:27.160 --> 0:09:30.240
<v Speaker 1>think that, um, if you're guessing about a visual object

0:09:30.679 --> 0:09:34.880
<v Speaker 1>or subject, then your frontal lobe and occipital lobe are

0:09:35.040 --> 0:09:40.960
<v Speaker 1>at work. Numerical quantities like how many uh jelly beans

0:09:40.960 --> 0:09:42.719
<v Speaker 1>are in that jar. That's kind of the common thing

0:09:42.880 --> 0:09:45.880
<v Speaker 1>they mentioned that like that still happens. Is that sort

0:09:45.920 --> 0:09:49.559
<v Speaker 1>of thing? Um, you know, who is a jelly bean

0:09:49.760 --> 0:09:55.200
<v Speaker 1>jar guessing champions? My wife really is, yes, longstanding, her

0:09:55.280 --> 0:09:59.960
<v Speaker 1>special reasoning is is outstanding well. Spatial reasoning and new

0:10:00.000 --> 0:10:03.400
<v Speaker 1>miracle quantities are a big part of trying to guess

0:10:03.800 --> 0:10:07.400
<v Speaker 1>the quantity of something into something right And and so

0:10:07.440 --> 0:10:10.920
<v Speaker 1>if you, if your brain is kind of specialized in

0:10:10.960 --> 0:10:14.640
<v Speaker 1>that manner, um, you are probably going to be better

0:10:14.720 --> 0:10:17.400
<v Speaker 1>at it than somebody whose brain is not right. So

0:10:17.840 --> 0:10:21.400
<v Speaker 1>Umi would beat me every time. My spatial reasoning is horrific. Right,

0:10:21.960 --> 0:10:25.959
<v Speaker 1>But um, I'm really good at recognizing faces, so I'm

0:10:26.000 --> 0:10:30.280
<v Speaker 1>probably better at at guessing the someone's age based on

0:10:30.320 --> 0:10:35.520
<v Speaker 1>their face um or possibly how they're feeling based on

0:10:35.559 --> 0:10:39.120
<v Speaker 1>their facial expression than she might be. That's a whole

0:10:39.400 --> 0:10:41.840
<v Speaker 1>like I didn't even think about that being part of guessing.

0:10:41.880 --> 0:10:47.400
<v Speaker 1>But the emotional thing of guessing, uh yeah, like someone's feelings,

0:10:47.480 --> 0:10:50.640
<v Speaker 1>what they're thinking like that, that's a whole different thing

0:10:50.720 --> 0:10:53.160
<v Speaker 1>than guessing jelly beans in a jar, which is different

0:10:53.160 --> 0:10:56.320
<v Speaker 1>than guessing someone's age. It's like all lumped into guessing.

0:10:56.360 --> 0:10:59.719
<v Speaker 1>It's really more varied than I ever considered, right, And

0:11:00.080 --> 0:11:02.880
<v Speaker 1>so with with UM, well, let's talk about the different

0:11:02.960 --> 0:11:06.120
<v Speaker 1>different types of guesses you might make. That. So, I

0:11:06.160 --> 0:11:07.720
<v Speaker 1>think what you just kind of did, Chuck, was you

0:11:07.800 --> 0:11:14.800
<v Speaker 1>divided UM guesses into UM like buckets, the two buckets.

0:11:14.920 --> 0:11:17.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to decide what the buckets would be called though.

0:11:17.040 --> 0:11:20.560
<v Speaker 1>So one bucket would be UM just kind of work,

0:11:21.040 --> 0:11:25.760
<v Speaker 1>working knowledge, and the other would be say, like emotional, right, Like, so,

0:11:25.960 --> 0:11:27.959
<v Speaker 1>how many jelly beans are in a jar? Would that

0:11:28.120 --> 0:11:31.440
<v Speaker 1>be in the working knowledge bucket? What somebody's feeling based

0:11:31.480 --> 0:11:34.960
<v Speaker 1>on your guests, based on say their facial expression, that's

0:11:35.000 --> 0:11:41.080
<v Speaker 1>that's emotional um or or intellectual. Yeah, that's why intellectual

0:11:41.320 --> 0:11:45.280
<v Speaker 1>or emotional buckets. BAM just carved them up. But I

0:11:45.320 --> 0:11:47.520
<v Speaker 1>think those are kind of like the two categories you

0:11:47.559 --> 0:11:50.160
<v Speaker 1>can put guesses into. Even though you can break types

0:11:50.160 --> 0:11:55.280
<v Speaker 1>of guesses down further. Yeah, and uh, breaking them down further,

0:11:55.679 --> 0:11:57.600
<v Speaker 1>you have your wild guesses. This is when you have

0:11:57.679 --> 0:12:02.960
<v Speaker 1>no information, no outside input whatsoever. And you know, you

0:12:03.000 --> 0:12:05.240
<v Speaker 1>often say, this is just a wild guess if I

0:12:05.240 --> 0:12:09.440
<v Speaker 1>had to guess, Yeah, something like that. You're saying here,

0:12:09.520 --> 0:12:12.560
<v Speaker 1>listen to me, I can speak has no basis in

0:12:12.640 --> 0:12:15.360
<v Speaker 1>factor reality or anything like that. Then you have your

0:12:15.480 --> 0:12:18.360
<v Speaker 1>educated guests, which is in the middle, and that's when

0:12:18.360 --> 0:12:20.960
<v Speaker 1>you have a little bit of information. Uh. There's a

0:12:21.000 --> 0:12:23.640
<v Speaker 1>military term that I had never heard of called swag,

0:12:24.720 --> 0:12:32.679
<v Speaker 1>which stands for um stuff we all get no scientific uh,

0:12:32.920 --> 0:12:37.080
<v Speaker 1>wild ass guessing okay, which is like a guestimate. But

0:12:37.160 --> 0:12:40.439
<v Speaker 1>it's a military term by all accounts. Uh. Most people

0:12:40.440 --> 0:12:43.720
<v Speaker 1>say it started in Vietnam with General Westmoreland. Um. And

0:12:43.800 --> 0:12:46.120
<v Speaker 1>you will hear military people say swag, and that's when

0:12:46.480 --> 0:12:48.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, I've got a little information. I'm not just

0:12:48.679 --> 0:12:53.640
<v Speaker 1>wild guessing here. This is a ballpark educated guess, right,

0:12:54.840 --> 0:12:57.760
<v Speaker 1>but it's not still less than an estimate. That's when

0:12:57.800 --> 0:13:00.559
<v Speaker 1>we have a lot more information. Yeah, just a lot

0:13:00.600 --> 0:13:04.600
<v Speaker 1>more information. But you're you're pretty familiar also with the

0:13:04.640 --> 0:13:08.400
<v Speaker 1>topic that you're you're guessing at as well. Right. So

0:13:08.840 --> 0:13:13.359
<v Speaker 1>Lewis and Clark, I think both of them, Um, we're surveyors.

0:13:13.360 --> 0:13:16.120
<v Speaker 1>So they would have had a lot of training as

0:13:16.160 --> 0:13:19.880
<v Speaker 1>far as you know, judging distance goes. They would have

0:13:19.920 --> 0:13:22.760
<v Speaker 1>had some information to put together. So Clark coming up with,

0:13:23.400 --> 0:13:27.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, with an estimate of how why the continent

0:13:27.080 --> 0:13:29.280
<v Speaker 1>is and just being off by forty miles, like you said,

0:13:29.280 --> 0:13:32.480
<v Speaker 1>that's remarkable, But if you had had one of us

0:13:32.520 --> 0:13:35.040
<v Speaker 1>do it, it would have been a wild guess. So

0:13:35.200 --> 0:13:39.360
<v Speaker 1>it has to do with the training, the expertise really UM,

0:13:39.440 --> 0:13:42.120
<v Speaker 1>and then the amount of information you have. That's that's

0:13:42.120 --> 0:13:44.520
<v Speaker 1>what an estimate is. Yeah, And you may not even

0:13:44.559 --> 0:13:47.520
<v Speaker 1>know that you have information stored away in your brain

0:13:47.600 --> 0:13:50.920
<v Speaker 1>that you're recalling when you're trying to hazard a guess

0:13:50.920 --> 0:13:54.800
<v Speaker 1>on something. You might just be uh, you might think

0:13:54.880 --> 0:13:57.679
<v Speaker 1>it's a wild guess, but you're really kind of picking

0:13:57.720 --> 0:14:02.000
<v Speaker 1>out something that happened in your past maybe, right. Or

0:14:02.040 --> 0:14:05.160
<v Speaker 1>another way to look at it is that UM is intuition,

0:14:05.440 --> 0:14:08.920
<v Speaker 1>which is um. From what I understand, intuition is kind

0:14:08.960 --> 0:14:12.240
<v Speaker 1>of its own category. But if it's most closely related

0:14:12.280 --> 0:14:15.000
<v Speaker 1>to any type of those three guests, as we just mentioned,

0:14:15.200 --> 0:14:18.600
<v Speaker 1>it would be an estimate. And it comes from years

0:14:18.600 --> 0:14:23.240
<v Speaker 1>and years and years of training UM or exposure to

0:14:23.600 --> 0:14:27.640
<v Speaker 1>whatever you're guessing at to the point where your guesses

0:14:28.040 --> 0:14:30.400
<v Speaker 1>don't even seem like guesses. It just seems like for

0:14:30.720 --> 0:14:34.040
<v Speaker 1>knowledge of what you're about to do. Yeah, Like I

0:14:34.120 --> 0:14:38.120
<v Speaker 1>used to be really really bad at guessing crowd sizes,

0:14:39.160 --> 0:14:43.440
<v Speaker 1>but through our live shows, I've gotten pretty good at

0:14:43.480 --> 0:14:45.680
<v Speaker 1>it because when you go to these theaters, you know

0:14:45.720 --> 0:14:47.840
<v Speaker 1>how many people are in there, and then you stand

0:14:47.880 --> 0:14:49.680
<v Speaker 1>in front of that many people. And if you do

0:14:49.760 --> 0:14:52.520
<v Speaker 1>that enough times, I can now say, like, you know,

0:14:52.520 --> 0:14:54.240
<v Speaker 1>when people when I'll go to a show or something,

0:14:54.240 --> 0:14:56.080
<v Speaker 1>they'll be like, how many people you think this place holds?

0:14:56.440 --> 0:14:58.160
<v Speaker 1>I used to let's say like, I have no idea

0:14:58.280 --> 0:15:00.200
<v Speaker 1>I know, but now you say, you know better eight

0:15:00.240 --> 0:15:04.520
<v Speaker 1>or nine people. Yeah, and you're probably pretty close within

0:15:04.600 --> 0:15:07.320
<v Speaker 1>forty miles. All bad. And that's just because of exposure

0:15:07.480 --> 0:15:10.960
<v Speaker 1>and learning, right, And that actually brings up a really

0:15:10.960 --> 0:15:13.760
<v Speaker 1>good point that you can actually get better at guessing.

0:15:14.240 --> 0:15:16.400
<v Speaker 1>And we'll get into that right after this break. How

0:15:16.400 --> 0:15:41.320
<v Speaker 1>about that, Chuck, right? Mm hmmm. Alright, So Chuck, you

0:15:41.360 --> 0:15:44.240
<v Speaker 1>said that, um, that you got better at estimating crowd

0:15:44.280 --> 0:15:48.000
<v Speaker 1>sizes by just performing at Our Lives shows. Right, So

0:15:48.480 --> 0:15:51.480
<v Speaker 1>you were terrible at it before, very bad, but just

0:15:51.600 --> 0:15:56.120
<v Speaker 1>from from exposing yourself to it, going out on stage

0:15:56.120 --> 0:15:59.240
<v Speaker 1>and exposing yourself to crowds that you could judge the

0:15:59.280 --> 0:16:06.800
<v Speaker 1>size of Um, and everybody clapped that guy, yeah, Nelson

0:16:07.520 --> 0:16:13.000
<v Speaker 1>pointed in laughs Portland, Um, you you got better at it.

0:16:13.040 --> 0:16:17.360
<v Speaker 1>And when it comes to especially but probably both, but

0:16:17.560 --> 0:16:22.880
<v Speaker 1>especially intellectual guesses intellectual bucket guesses. Um, you can train

0:16:22.920 --> 0:16:25.400
<v Speaker 1>yourself to get better at it, and part of that

0:16:25.760 --> 0:16:30.680
<v Speaker 1>is making a guess, getting um, pretty much immediate feedback,

0:16:30.760 --> 0:16:33.320
<v Speaker 1>and then learning from that. Yeah, like you're wrong, this

0:16:33.360 --> 0:16:36.400
<v Speaker 1>is what the answer is. It's like anything else exactly.

0:16:36.480 --> 0:16:39.240
<v Speaker 1>Do that enough, you're gonna get better at it. Yeah. Um.

0:16:39.320 --> 0:16:42.800
<v Speaker 1>And there's this pretty interesting UM, I guess. That was

0:16:42.880 --> 0:16:46.240
<v Speaker 1>interesting little kind of sidetrack that the author of the

0:16:46.280 --> 0:16:51.960
<v Speaker 1>guesses article, Alea hoyt Um, took, and I have to say, no,

0:16:52.040 --> 0:16:55.320
<v Speaker 1>it is Aliyah. It's not Alicia. No, it's Aliyah. There's

0:16:55.360 --> 0:16:59.200
<v Speaker 1>no saying Alicia for not only is the C silent,

0:16:59.400 --> 0:17:04.560
<v Speaker 1>it's not the it's invisible. So Aaliyah hoyt my hats

0:17:04.560 --> 0:17:07.560
<v Speaker 1>off to her because doing supplemental research for this, there

0:17:07.600 --> 0:17:11.399
<v Speaker 1>are not a lot of people who are coming up

0:17:11.440 --> 0:17:17.240
<v Speaker 1>with really substantial stuff about guesses. It's like it's barren.

0:17:17.480 --> 0:17:21.440
<v Speaker 1>It's probably the least amount of research I've ever encountered

0:17:21.480 --> 0:17:24.879
<v Speaker 1>in all of our almost thousand plus episodes. So the

0:17:24.920 --> 0:17:27.480
<v Speaker 1>fact that she put this together, my hats off to her.

0:17:27.520 --> 0:17:30.479
<v Speaker 1>But a sidetrack she takes is to teach the reader,

0:17:30.800 --> 0:17:35.040
<v Speaker 1>how to um get better at guessing a jar full

0:17:35.040 --> 0:17:39.359
<v Speaker 1>of jelly beans? Yeah, well that was exciting, I mean that,

0:17:39.800 --> 0:17:42.800
<v Speaker 1>oh yeah, yeah, because always, I mean my method was

0:17:42.840 --> 0:17:48.479
<v Speaker 1>always to pick out a smaller area, like the bottom

0:17:48.640 --> 0:17:53.280
<v Speaker 1>inch of the jar, count as many as I could,

0:17:53.520 --> 0:17:56.959
<v Speaker 1>and estimate that and then multiply that out. That's actually

0:17:57.000 --> 0:18:01.600
<v Speaker 1>a great techniquead. Well, I don't know, I haven't guessed

0:18:01.640 --> 0:18:04.800
<v Speaker 1>jelly beans in a jar since I was probably twelve, right,

0:18:05.200 --> 0:18:07.199
<v Speaker 1>But that was always my method, which has a little

0:18:08.400 --> 0:18:10.200
<v Speaker 1>there's a little bit of method to it, but it's

0:18:10.200 --> 0:18:13.840
<v Speaker 1>definitely not as good as as this one. Okay, so

0:18:13.840 --> 0:18:17.920
<v Speaker 1>so this one it sounds a little more complex than

0:18:18.160 --> 0:18:21.560
<v Speaker 1>than it actually is. But if you say, if you

0:18:21.640 --> 0:18:24.000
<v Speaker 1>look at a jar and it's filled with jelly beans,

0:18:24.480 --> 0:18:28.719
<v Speaker 1>you can say, um, that jar is the volume of

0:18:28.760 --> 0:18:33.040
<v Speaker 1>that jar is say a court Okay, but then you

0:18:33.200 --> 0:18:36.639
<v Speaker 1>kind of want to begin with sure, right, But you

0:18:36.680 --> 0:18:38.760
<v Speaker 1>can learn, right, you can just look around, Like here's

0:18:38.800 --> 0:18:41.240
<v Speaker 1>the point. If you want to get good at guessing

0:18:41.760 --> 0:18:43.840
<v Speaker 1>jelly beans. It just takes a little bit of work.

0:18:44.800 --> 0:18:47.359
<v Speaker 1>Most people would walk up, say a million jelly beans,

0:18:47.359 --> 0:18:49.960
<v Speaker 1>and they're off by like nine thousand. They're like well,

0:18:50.000 --> 0:18:52.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm terrible at guessing jelly beans. I'm going to sleep

0:18:52.320 --> 0:18:54.680
<v Speaker 1>for the rest of my life. But if you want

0:18:54.720 --> 0:18:56.879
<v Speaker 1>to get good at guessing at jelly beans, all you

0:18:56.880 --> 0:18:59.440
<v Speaker 1>have to do is poke around, learn a few things,

0:18:59.680 --> 0:19:02.200
<v Speaker 1>and then you can basically apply those to every situation.

0:19:02.240 --> 0:19:03.720
<v Speaker 1>And one of the things you would need to learn

0:19:04.080 --> 0:19:06.720
<v Speaker 1>is how to judge the volume of the container to

0:19:06.800 --> 0:19:09.879
<v Speaker 1>start correct. So that's one part, right, yeah, which you

0:19:09.920 --> 0:19:12.040
<v Speaker 1>know most people would do that that by comparing it

0:19:12.080 --> 0:19:14.280
<v Speaker 1>to like a milk jug or a two leader bottle

0:19:14.359 --> 0:19:16.399
<v Speaker 1>or something like that, right, But in this case, to

0:19:16.440 --> 0:19:20.560
<v Speaker 1>get a really accurate estimate, you would want to know specifically,

0:19:20.840 --> 0:19:25.600
<v Speaker 1>say how many ounces a container held correct. Um. And

0:19:25.640 --> 0:19:28.280
<v Speaker 1>then another thing you would probably do if you started

0:19:28.320 --> 0:19:32.760
<v Speaker 1>researching guessing jelly beans and jar on the internet, um,

0:19:32.920 --> 0:19:36.080
<v Speaker 1>you would you would run across some research that found

0:19:36.480 --> 0:19:42.040
<v Speaker 1>that if you have uh, spherical objects in a jar,

0:19:42.680 --> 0:19:46.199
<v Speaker 1>they typically take up about if you fill the thing up,

0:19:46.359 --> 0:19:50.320
<v Speaker 1>they take typically take up about sixty four of the

0:19:50.359 --> 0:19:53.160
<v Speaker 1>actual volume of the jar. And that's if it's they're

0:19:53.200 --> 0:19:56.000
<v Speaker 1>just randomly dumped. Right. So if you come across a

0:19:56.080 --> 0:20:00.239
<v Speaker 1>jar and you say, um, and it's filled with like

0:20:00.400 --> 0:20:07.679
<v Speaker 1>perfectly round. Um, okay, perfectly round bouncy balls, right, Um,

0:20:07.840 --> 0:20:11.160
<v Speaker 1>you can say, well, those are spherical and they're taking

0:20:11.200 --> 0:20:13.840
<v Speaker 1>up about six of the jar. So all I have

0:20:13.920 --> 0:20:17.159
<v Speaker 1>to do is figure out the um the basically the

0:20:17.240 --> 0:20:22.200
<v Speaker 1>size of each of the ball, right, and then divide

0:20:22.200 --> 0:20:26.719
<v Speaker 1>it by the volume, and then bam, you just guessed

0:20:26.920 --> 0:20:29.520
<v Speaker 1>how many are in there, and you're probably pretty close

0:20:29.560 --> 0:20:32.960
<v Speaker 1>to right. Sure, So this all sounds mind numbing. I've

0:20:33.000 --> 0:20:35.880
<v Speaker 1>got a little, um, a little trickle blood coming out

0:20:35.880 --> 0:20:40.200
<v Speaker 1>of my ear right now. But you can the whole point,

0:20:40.200 --> 0:20:43.320
<v Speaker 1>and you can train yourself to make better guesses, to

0:20:43.520 --> 0:20:46.760
<v Speaker 1>estimate better. That's the whole point. Yeah. And if it's

0:20:46.760 --> 0:20:50.359
<v Speaker 1>a non spherical by the way, like if it's peanuts

0:20:50.440 --> 0:20:55.640
<v Speaker 1>or something like that, or ice cubes, not disgusting circus peanuts.

0:20:56.119 --> 0:21:01.760
<v Speaker 1>Oh man, the that conjures up so many memories. Did

0:21:01.760 --> 0:21:05.800
<v Speaker 1>you like those? Well? I think I might have when

0:21:05.840 --> 0:21:07.560
<v Speaker 1>I was a kid, but I haven't had one in

0:21:08.119 --> 0:21:10.960
<v Speaker 1>forty years. But I still remember the taste you me

0:21:11.119 --> 0:21:13.560
<v Speaker 1>just had something. She says, they still hold up, and

0:21:13.600 --> 0:21:15.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, I didn't like him, then I'm not gonna

0:21:15.600 --> 0:21:17.240
<v Speaker 1>like him now. Well, they hold up for you in

0:21:17.240 --> 0:21:20.520
<v Speaker 1>a bad way, right right, yeah, exactly, So I know,

0:21:20.680 --> 0:21:23.480
<v Speaker 1>I know I'm not supposed to yuck. Anyone's young, but yuck.

0:21:24.640 --> 0:21:28.960
<v Speaker 1>So uh, if it's circus peanuts, let's say, um, that

0:21:29.000 --> 0:21:34.560
<v Speaker 1>would be between fifty and of the space, not sixty four. Yeah, so, uh,

0:21:34.600 --> 0:21:37.439
<v Speaker 1>what is you mean's method? Did you ask her? She

0:21:37.480 --> 0:21:42.600
<v Speaker 1>says she just kind of knowsh So she's a precock exactly.

0:21:43.080 --> 0:21:45.240
<v Speaker 1>She she shaves her head once a while and lays

0:21:45.280 --> 0:21:48.280
<v Speaker 1>around in a vat of liquid. Wow, that would be see,

0:21:48.320 --> 0:21:51.640
<v Speaker 1>I would that would scare me if that would if

0:21:51.640 --> 0:21:53.480
<v Speaker 1>that was my wife's answer, if she just like kind

0:21:53.480 --> 0:21:56.240
<v Speaker 1>of walked by and said I just know, right, yeah,

0:21:56.280 --> 0:21:59.199
<v Speaker 1>I would be like, well, what else do you just know? Yeah?

0:22:00.040 --> 0:22:03.040
<v Speaker 1>She's kind of unstoppable too. You have no idea how

0:22:03.080 --> 0:22:05.760
<v Speaker 1>many calves we've won at county fairs in the last

0:22:05.920 --> 0:22:11.000
<v Speaker 1>year alone. Our house is overrun with them. Um. All right,

0:22:11.040 --> 0:22:13.920
<v Speaker 1>So that's just guessing volume of a thing and a thing.

0:22:14.440 --> 0:22:18.160
<v Speaker 1>That's an it's intellectual guessing. Yeah, right, But you can

0:22:18.200 --> 0:22:21.240
<v Speaker 1>train yourself to guess better. What's really up for for

0:22:21.640 --> 0:22:25.960
<v Speaker 1>questioning is whether you can train yourself to get better

0:22:26.000 --> 0:22:29.960
<v Speaker 1>at the other bucket of guessing emotional type of guessing

0:22:30.040 --> 0:22:33.480
<v Speaker 1>right where you're walking around and you are interacting with

0:22:33.520 --> 0:22:36.719
<v Speaker 1>other people and you're making judgments about how they're feeling

0:22:36.800 --> 0:22:39.520
<v Speaker 1>right then, about what they're thinking, right then, what their

0:22:39.560 --> 0:22:43.840
<v Speaker 1>motives are. Um, you know, how how well they're actually

0:22:43.880 --> 0:22:46.800
<v Speaker 1>listening to you all of these things right? It's part

0:22:46.800 --> 0:22:51.480
<v Speaker 1>of our interaction with other people. And there's something that

0:22:51.760 --> 0:22:55.920
<v Speaker 1>UM two researchers called X and took great combo that

0:22:56.000 --> 0:23:00.320
<v Speaker 1>back established this kind of field of inquiry in which

0:23:00.320 --> 0:23:02.359
<v Speaker 1>they were trying to get to the bottom of what

0:23:02.400 --> 0:23:07.199
<v Speaker 1>they called empathic accuracy, which is how accurately we can

0:23:07.520 --> 0:23:11.440
<v Speaker 1>we can surmise what someone actually is feeling or thinking

0:23:11.760 --> 0:23:15.360
<v Speaker 1>just from interacting with them. Some people are supposedly good

0:23:15.359 --> 0:23:18.640
<v Speaker 1>at it, some people are not. And from what I saw,

0:23:18.720 --> 0:23:22.000
<v Speaker 1>there's a big kind of push and pull about whether

0:23:22.400 --> 0:23:25.919
<v Speaker 1>it's worth practicing or whether you should just not do

0:23:26.000 --> 0:23:28.200
<v Speaker 1>that at all for the sake of your own sanity

0:23:28.440 --> 0:23:31.359
<v Speaker 1>and just say, if you tell me that you're in

0:23:31.400 --> 0:23:34.000
<v Speaker 1>a good mood, I'm going to take that at face value.

0:23:34.240 --> 0:23:37.879
<v Speaker 1>And if you're actually not, then you're you're covering up

0:23:37.880 --> 0:23:41.200
<v Speaker 1>your feelings for your own reason, and that's that's fine.

0:23:41.240 --> 0:23:43.160
<v Speaker 1>If you want to just keep them to yourself, that's fine.

0:23:43.200 --> 0:23:45.240
<v Speaker 1>If you want to share them, I'm here, but I'm

0:23:45.240 --> 0:23:47.920
<v Speaker 1>gonna I'm gonna take what you're saying on face value,

0:23:48.119 --> 0:23:51.640
<v Speaker 1>so Bully for you, that to me is sanity. He's

0:23:51.680 --> 0:23:59.000
<v Speaker 1>like going, how are you really feeling that you can? Uh,

0:23:59.160 --> 0:24:01.719
<v Speaker 1>one can spend a lot of time doing that, so

0:24:01.720 --> 0:24:03.920
<v Speaker 1>so can I share a little bit about myself here?

0:24:04.920 --> 0:24:09.199
<v Speaker 1>I know it's weird, feels gross, but um. For a

0:24:09.320 --> 0:24:14.040
<v Speaker 1>very long time, Chuck, I thought that I was a

0:24:14.720 --> 0:24:19.600
<v Speaker 1>born and bread and path that like I could understand

0:24:19.920 --> 0:24:23.080
<v Speaker 1>what anyone was thinking and feeling, maybe even better than

0:24:23.240 --> 0:24:27.000
<v Speaker 1>they knew how they were thinking and feeling. And I

0:24:27.080 --> 0:24:32.159
<v Speaker 1>finally finally came to the hard truth that I was

0:24:32.200 --> 0:24:36.520
<v Speaker 1>wrong almost all the time. And in figuring this out,

0:24:36.560 --> 0:24:38.720
<v Speaker 1>like this was really jarring, and it took a little

0:24:38.720 --> 0:24:41.160
<v Speaker 1>while for me to like really for this to sink in.

0:24:42.040 --> 0:24:45.080
<v Speaker 1>But once I figured out that I'm actually terrible at

0:24:45.160 --> 0:24:48.359
<v Speaker 1>reading engaging other people's thoughts and feelings, it was one

0:24:48.359 --> 0:24:50.520
<v Speaker 1>of the most liberating things that's ever happened to me

0:24:50.680 --> 0:24:55.120
<v Speaker 1>because I just stopped. I stopped, and I realized how

0:24:55.200 --> 0:24:59.000
<v Speaker 1>much of my life I've been walking around wasting just

0:24:59.119 --> 0:25:02.399
<v Speaker 1>thinking about know what people really think or you know,

0:25:02.880 --> 0:25:06.040
<v Speaker 1>do people really like me? They probably don't, or do they?

0:25:06.119 --> 0:25:09.760
<v Speaker 1>Or what do they mean by that look or whatever?

0:25:10.440 --> 0:25:13.720
<v Speaker 1>And just taking people in life on face value. UM

0:25:13.840 --> 0:25:17.280
<v Speaker 1>is so much. It's just it occupies so much less

0:25:17.320 --> 0:25:20.200
<v Speaker 1>of your mind on any given moment. It's just great.

0:25:20.600 --> 0:25:24.120
<v Speaker 1>That's my prescription. Stop trying to figure out what other

0:25:24.160 --> 0:25:26.800
<v Speaker 1>people are really thinking and feeling. You should have You

0:25:26.800 --> 0:25:29.320
<v Speaker 1>should have just asked me a long time ago. And

0:25:29.400 --> 0:25:33.399
<v Speaker 1>when he told you, I was like, you're terrible at that. Yeah, yeah, yeah,

0:25:33.600 --> 0:25:34.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if I want to listen. You know,

0:25:35.040 --> 0:25:37.040
<v Speaker 1>it took it took a little while, but to walk

0:25:37.080 --> 0:25:38.919
<v Speaker 1>through their own doors. You know what I'm saying? That

0:25:39.119 --> 0:25:42.120
<v Speaker 1>is well put man, You're you're a stoic sage. So

0:25:42.920 --> 0:25:46.439
<v Speaker 1>cognitive distortion is is a phrase you hear pop up

0:25:46.440 --> 0:25:50.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot when it comes to assessing another person's emotions.

0:25:51.359 --> 0:25:54.399
<v Speaker 1>And these are these inaccurate thoughts that you have in

0:25:54.480 --> 0:25:58.240
<v Speaker 1>your brain. Sometimes they leave to negative thinking or encourage

0:25:58.280 --> 0:26:01.880
<v Speaker 1>that I think probably most times is probably the case. UM.

0:26:01.920 --> 0:26:05.640
<v Speaker 1>And then polarized thinking is another bucket, I guess since

0:26:05.640 --> 0:26:09.440
<v Speaker 1>we're bucketing everything today. UM, which is you know, everything

0:26:09.520 --> 0:26:12.320
<v Speaker 1>is great or everything is terrible. And the example they

0:26:12.359 --> 0:26:15.360
<v Speaker 1>give in this in this article is, you know, it's

0:26:15.359 --> 0:26:17.440
<v Speaker 1>simply I mean, it's a little boy reading a girl's

0:26:17.440 --> 0:26:20.520
<v Speaker 1>face that you know she doesn't like me, but that

0:26:20.520 --> 0:26:22.560
<v Speaker 1>that's a kid in the elementary school. You can apply

0:26:22.640 --> 0:26:27.600
<v Speaker 1>this to anyone walking into a room and basically reading

0:26:27.800 --> 0:26:31.199
<v Speaker 1>either the room or reading a person and saying like,

0:26:31.600 --> 0:26:33.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, I don't like the way that that person

0:26:33.920 --> 0:26:38.040
<v Speaker 1>just looked at me. Um, that's bad, and so I

0:26:38.040 --> 0:26:40.000
<v Speaker 1>don't think they like me. And those are both of

0:26:40.000 --> 0:26:44.480
<v Speaker 1>those things at work, cognitive distortion and polarized thinking, right,

0:26:44.880 --> 0:26:47.080
<v Speaker 1>which which I think polar is thinking is a type

0:26:47.080 --> 0:26:49.760
<v Speaker 1>of cognitive distortion. I think that's the umbrella term for

0:26:49.800 --> 0:26:52.359
<v Speaker 1>that kind of thing. Right, Yeah, that makes sense, So

0:26:52.600 --> 0:26:55.000
<v Speaker 1>um yeah, I think this is kind of where you

0:26:55.040 --> 0:26:57.080
<v Speaker 1>get to why a lot of people are terrible at

0:26:57.080 --> 0:26:59.840
<v Speaker 1>guessing or get get their guessing wrong, especially when it

0:26:59.840 --> 0:27:02.480
<v Speaker 1>comes saying what other people are thinking and feeling. Is

0:27:02.520 --> 0:27:04.639
<v Speaker 1>that your guess is, whether you realize it or not,

0:27:05.000 --> 0:27:08.680
<v Speaker 1>are actually colored and come through a lens of your

0:27:08.760 --> 0:27:12.240
<v Speaker 1>past history. Right, So, like if if you were raised

0:27:12.240 --> 0:27:15.760
<v Speaker 1>in a house where people your family members are really

0:27:15.800 --> 0:27:18.800
<v Speaker 1>critical of you and one another. If you see two

0:27:18.800 --> 0:27:21.359
<v Speaker 1>people in a corner like kind of like having a

0:27:21.440 --> 0:27:24.920
<v Speaker 1>quiet conversation but laughing too, you're probably gonna think they're

0:27:24.960 --> 0:27:27.320
<v Speaker 1>laughing at you, even though they may not even be

0:27:27.359 --> 0:27:30.880
<v Speaker 1>paying the least bit of attention to you. But because

0:27:30.920 --> 0:27:34.040
<v Speaker 1>of the history of how you grew up, that's what

0:27:34.119 --> 0:27:37.040
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna guess at, right. Whereas if somebody was raised

0:27:37.040 --> 0:27:40.400
<v Speaker 1>in a house where they were instilled with a lot

0:27:40.440 --> 0:27:42.919
<v Speaker 1>of confidence and like a great sense of humor, that

0:27:43.000 --> 0:27:45.800
<v Speaker 1>person might just think, man, they must be talking about

0:27:45.840 --> 0:27:48.080
<v Speaker 1>something hilarious. I wish I knew what the joke was,

0:27:48.359 --> 0:27:50.320
<v Speaker 1>or they might have so much confidence in sense of

0:27:50.400 --> 0:27:52.920
<v Speaker 1>humor they might even walk up and engage them and say,

0:27:53.200 --> 0:27:56.720
<v Speaker 1>what do you guys laughing at? Right? Huh? And if no, no, nothing,

0:27:56.760 --> 0:27:59.399
<v Speaker 1>never mind, then you may be onto something. Right. But

0:27:59.480 --> 0:28:02.000
<v Speaker 1>there was the some there's this blog post and man,

0:28:02.040 --> 0:28:04.119
<v Speaker 1>I wish I could remember what the site was. I

0:28:04.160 --> 0:28:07.639
<v Speaker 1>apologize sight, but it was basically like stopped trying to

0:28:07.640 --> 0:28:10.199
<v Speaker 1>read other people's minds was the gist of it. And

0:28:10.240 --> 0:28:14.000
<v Speaker 1>they actually used that example, and they went on to say, like,

0:28:14.119 --> 0:28:18.399
<v Speaker 1>even if the person who thinks that that they're laughing

0:28:18.440 --> 0:28:21.240
<v Speaker 1>at them turns out to be right. That's not the

0:28:21.280 --> 0:28:24.639
<v Speaker 1>worst thing that can happen to you. Yeah, it's fine.

0:28:24.960 --> 0:28:28.560
<v Speaker 1>Who cares, you know, Like, like some people aren't gonna

0:28:28.600 --> 0:28:31.760
<v Speaker 1>like you, some people will. It doesn't really matter. Like

0:28:31.800 --> 0:28:34.080
<v Speaker 1>if somebody doesn't like you, You've got to have a

0:28:34.080 --> 0:28:36.320
<v Speaker 1>little more self confidence than the let that just completely

0:28:36.320 --> 0:28:40.040
<v Speaker 1>derail your day. Yeah, and you and you have to

0:28:40.080 --> 0:28:43.840
<v Speaker 1>find it within yourself, Yeah, for sure. And some people

0:28:43.880 --> 0:28:45.880
<v Speaker 1>get that through years of therapy. Some people are born

0:28:45.920 --> 0:28:49.160
<v Speaker 1>with it. Some people never achieve it. Yeah, I think

0:28:49.200 --> 0:28:51.120
<v Speaker 1>it's you know, even if you are born with I

0:28:51.120 --> 0:28:52.959
<v Speaker 1>think you can lose it from time to time. If

0:28:53.000 --> 0:28:54.800
<v Speaker 1>you're not born with it, you can gain it from

0:28:54.840 --> 0:28:56.680
<v Speaker 1>time to time. But it's not something I think you

0:28:56.800 --> 0:29:00.880
<v Speaker 1>have every moment of every day necessarily. Yeah. Boy, people

0:29:00.920 --> 0:29:03.800
<v Speaker 1>with just too much confidence are so annoying. They really

0:29:03.840 --> 0:29:07.239
<v Speaker 1>are because everyone wants that, you know. I think that's

0:29:07.280 --> 0:29:09.760
<v Speaker 1>why it's annoying. Sure, just like, man, I wish I

0:29:09.760 --> 0:29:12.960
<v Speaker 1>could be that confident about everything. I hate that guy,

0:29:13.240 --> 0:29:15.360
<v Speaker 1>and then you end up in a corner talking to

0:29:15.360 --> 0:29:17.200
<v Speaker 1>somebody else about how much you hate that person with

0:29:17.280 --> 0:29:20.680
<v Speaker 1>so much confidence totally lost on the other person. So

0:29:20.760 --> 0:29:22.840
<v Speaker 1>I have another theory that's not scientific at all. It's

0:29:22.880 --> 0:29:25.440
<v Speaker 1>just my personal theory that when it comes to guessing things,

0:29:25.520 --> 0:29:28.680
<v Speaker 1>your own not well, your past experiences certainly influence it,

0:29:28.760 --> 0:29:33.560
<v Speaker 1>but your own how you are also influences like oh yeah,

0:29:33.560 --> 0:29:35.760
<v Speaker 1>like I think a liar is more apt to think

0:29:35.800 --> 0:29:39.719
<v Speaker 1>people are lying to them precisely. Yeah, no, that's absolutely

0:29:39.880 --> 0:29:42.360
<v Speaker 1>I agree. I was gonna say it's absolutely true, but

0:29:42.720 --> 0:29:44.959
<v Speaker 1>I agree with you. Yeah, because who knows. It's just

0:29:45.000 --> 0:29:48.160
<v Speaker 1>a theory, right, but I mean it's it's based it's

0:29:48.280 --> 0:29:51.080
<v Speaker 1>based on some pretty ancient folk wisdom, like that whole

0:29:51.160 --> 0:29:53.600
<v Speaker 1>thing about how um you know, when you're pointing a

0:29:53.600 --> 0:29:56.719
<v Speaker 1>finger at somebody three fingers pointing at you or judge

0:29:56.800 --> 0:30:00.800
<v Speaker 1>not lest you be judged. Like when you think about

0:30:00.920 --> 0:30:03.720
<v Speaker 1>people in that way, you think that they're doing the

0:30:03.760 --> 0:30:05.720
<v Speaker 1>same thing to you, even when they're not. It's your own,

0:30:06.120 --> 0:30:09.880
<v Speaker 1>um hilarious little personal hell yeah, and it's not always that, Like,

0:30:09.960 --> 0:30:12.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think that dude's ripping me off. Maybe

0:30:12.920 --> 0:30:15.760
<v Speaker 1>you've been ripped off before and that's where that's coming from.

0:30:15.880 --> 0:30:19.040
<v Speaker 1>Or maybe you've ripped someone off before. But about one

0:30:19.040 --> 0:30:21.320
<v Speaker 1>of the two has happened, I think though, What more,

0:30:21.440 --> 0:30:24.360
<v Speaker 1>what you're what you're talking about is are like core

0:30:24.360 --> 0:30:28.960
<v Speaker 1>core character traits though, like judge, being judgmental, or being

0:30:29.000 --> 0:30:32.560
<v Speaker 1>a liar or um, you know, being a b s

0:30:32.640 --> 0:30:36.240
<v Speaker 1>or something like that. Like when when you do notice that, though,

0:30:36.560 --> 0:30:39.920
<v Speaker 1>What's great is there's so much room for growth when

0:30:39.960 --> 0:30:41.840
<v Speaker 1>you when you realize that that, like, wait a minute,

0:30:41.880 --> 0:30:44.920
<v Speaker 1>I think everybody's judging me because I'm so judgmental. I

0:30:44.960 --> 0:30:48.320
<v Speaker 1>need to work on being judgmental. What's what's almost magical

0:30:48.520 --> 0:30:51.400
<v Speaker 1>is that when you when you realize that and you

0:30:51.480 --> 0:30:54.600
<v Speaker 1>work on not being judgmental, you stop thinking that other

0:30:54.600 --> 0:30:58.560
<v Speaker 1>people are judging you, and your life is just freer. Well,

0:30:58.600 --> 0:31:01.680
<v Speaker 1>there are these uh so I cologists um and all

0:31:01.720 --> 0:31:05.680
<v Speaker 1>over this article that uh Aaliyah just rocked my world

0:31:05.760 --> 0:31:09.040
<v Speaker 1>with that wrote, and one of them was talking about

0:31:09.080 --> 0:31:14.360
<v Speaker 1>these interpretations without evidence. And her advice, which is very

0:31:14.360 --> 0:31:16.120
<v Speaker 1>simple and it seems like a no brainer though, is

0:31:16.120 --> 0:31:18.160
<v Speaker 1>to like maybe just focus on things you know to

0:31:18.280 --> 0:31:22.080
<v Speaker 1>be true and not inventing and surmising, like well what

0:31:22.120 --> 0:31:23.840
<v Speaker 1>if what if they're talking about this and you know

0:31:24.320 --> 0:31:26.840
<v Speaker 1>you're you're just kind of inventing all that? Like if

0:31:26.880 --> 0:31:29.600
<v Speaker 1>you concentrate on what you know to be true, then

0:31:29.600 --> 0:31:32.240
<v Speaker 1>life gets a lot simpler, right, But that's that same

0:31:32.240 --> 0:31:35.520
<v Speaker 1>shrink also pointed out that one of the big problems

0:31:35.560 --> 0:31:40.280
<v Speaker 1>with guessing, and especially guessing incorrectly, is that, um, we

0:31:40.880 --> 0:31:43.880
<v Speaker 1>tend to forget that we're guessing at stuff. We take

0:31:43.880 --> 0:31:47.680
<v Speaker 1>our own guesses as as fact, and since they can

0:31:47.720 --> 0:31:51.840
<v Speaker 1>be so horribly wrong. Um, if you if you're guessing

0:31:51.880 --> 0:31:55.080
<v Speaker 1>that other people are judging you even when they're not, Uh,

0:31:55.600 --> 0:31:58.360
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna basically walk around feeling judged all the time

0:31:58.400 --> 0:32:01.320
<v Speaker 1>because you think that that's absolutely accurate when it's when

0:32:01.320 --> 0:32:03.960
<v Speaker 1>it's not necessarily fascinating. All right, you want to take

0:32:03.960 --> 0:32:06.000
<v Speaker 1>a break. I was just gonna say the same thing.

0:32:06.440 --> 0:32:08.000
<v Speaker 1>All right, Well we'll take a break and we are

0:32:08.040 --> 0:32:10.800
<v Speaker 1>going to come back talk a little bit about guessing

0:32:10.880 --> 0:32:14.400
<v Speaker 1>on tests, how to win it rock paper scissors and

0:32:14.920 --> 0:32:41.920
<v Speaker 1>apes and guessing. M h. All right, So we we've

0:32:41.960 --> 0:32:46.040
<v Speaker 1>talked in esoteric terms about guessing so far. But I

0:32:46.040 --> 0:32:49.520
<v Speaker 1>think what everyone really wants to know is how do

0:32:49.600 --> 0:32:53.520
<v Speaker 1>I pass a multiple choice test? Right? Because that's another

0:32:53.600 --> 0:32:56.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of guessing. Um, it's you know, guessing runs the

0:32:56.320 --> 0:33:00.200
<v Speaker 1>gamut uh, from emotional to stuff like this. There or

0:33:00.240 --> 0:33:03.640
<v Speaker 1>have been different theories over the years, like well, first

0:33:03.640 --> 0:33:06.040
<v Speaker 1>of all, back in the day and I guess until

0:33:06.280 --> 0:33:09.000
<v Speaker 1>semi recently, for like the S A T and A

0:33:09.080 --> 0:33:11.840
<v Speaker 1>C T and other standardized tests, you would be penalized

0:33:11.880 --> 0:33:17.120
<v Speaker 1>for an incorrect guess. I don't remember that, do you. Yeah, yeah,

0:33:17.200 --> 0:33:20.080
<v Speaker 1>if you guess something wrong, it's like a quarter point deduction.

0:33:20.160 --> 0:33:22.600
<v Speaker 1>I think was the deal. Oh, it sounds familiar. I

0:33:22.600 --> 0:33:25.320
<v Speaker 1>think I may have blocked it out. But they don't

0:33:25.320 --> 0:33:27.480
<v Speaker 1>do that anymore. So now they say guest guest guests

0:33:27.480 --> 0:33:30.520
<v Speaker 1>if you don't know the answer, um, and you know

0:33:30.640 --> 0:33:33.440
<v Speaker 1>they're there. That has run the gamut from always guests

0:33:33.440 --> 0:33:36.680
<v Speaker 1>C because it's in the middle to uh, this one person.

0:33:36.800 --> 0:33:39.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't necessarily agree with this one. But they say,

0:33:39.560 --> 0:33:42.480
<v Speaker 1>just choose the same letter every time, like always guess B,

0:33:43.400 --> 0:33:46.040
<v Speaker 1>and you're gonna be right one out of every five

0:33:46.120 --> 0:33:48.840
<v Speaker 1>times if it's A B, C, D right. Which makes

0:33:48.840 --> 0:33:51.120
<v Speaker 1>sense though, I mean, because if you jump around, you

0:33:51.240 --> 0:33:53.720
<v Speaker 1>lessen your chances every time, whereas if you use the

0:33:53.760 --> 0:33:55.960
<v Speaker 1>same one you have the same chances of getting it

0:33:56.080 --> 0:33:59.520
<v Speaker 1>right every time. Yeah. Um, but this guy wrote a

0:34:00.680 --> 0:34:04.360
<v Speaker 1>he actually did a little studying um, Paula pound Stone.

0:34:07.200 --> 0:34:10.360
<v Speaker 1>That wasn't his name, was it. It was William pound Stone,

0:34:10.440 --> 0:34:15.920
<v Speaker 1>her brother. Yeah, and he did actual research on He

0:34:16.000 --> 0:34:20.480
<v Speaker 1>studied tests and did a statistical analysis of one hundred

0:34:20.560 --> 0:34:25.920
<v Speaker 1>different tests ranging from middle school, high school, college, professional exams,

0:34:25.960 --> 0:34:30.400
<v Speaker 1>driver's tests, firefighters, radio operators. He studied all kinds of

0:34:30.440 --> 0:34:35.120
<v Speaker 1>tests and he has four what he calls four ways

0:34:35.120 --> 0:34:37.279
<v Speaker 1>to outsmart to multiple choice tests, and a couple of

0:34:37.320 --> 0:34:40.160
<v Speaker 1>these make a lot of sense to me. The first one,

0:34:40.200 --> 0:34:43.879
<v Speaker 1>he said, is to ignore conventional wisdom because you kind

0:34:43.880 --> 0:34:47.960
<v Speaker 1>of always have heard teachers say like avoid answers that

0:34:48.080 --> 0:34:50.799
<v Speaker 1>say never, always or none, So like all of the

0:34:50.800 --> 0:34:53.040
<v Speaker 1>above or none of the above, don't choose those, And

0:34:53.080 --> 0:34:56.000
<v Speaker 1>he found the opposite to be true. Yeah, he found

0:34:56.000 --> 0:34:57.960
<v Speaker 1>that none of the above or all of the above

0:34:58.000 --> 0:35:01.839
<v Speaker 1>are correct of the time. Him. Yeah, So if that's

0:35:01.880 --> 0:35:04.879
<v Speaker 1>offered up as an option, and you have, first of all,

0:35:04.960 --> 0:35:10.040
<v Speaker 1>we should couch this with always try and you know,

0:35:10.520 --> 0:35:14.600
<v Speaker 1>deduce the answer with intelligence, well yeah, pound Stone says,

0:35:14.600 --> 0:35:18.200
<v Speaker 1>there's nothing None of this is meant to replace knowledge

0:35:18.239 --> 0:35:20.520
<v Speaker 1>of your subject, and you get knowledge of your subject

0:35:20.560 --> 0:35:23.239
<v Speaker 1>by studying ahead of time. But he's saying, if you're

0:35:23.239 --> 0:35:26.080
<v Speaker 1>facing a question on a multiple choice test and you

0:35:26.160 --> 0:35:30.000
<v Speaker 1>have no idea what the answer is you there's some

0:35:30.040 --> 0:35:33.360
<v Speaker 1>techniques you can choose to to to increase the likelihood

0:35:33.360 --> 0:35:35.719
<v Speaker 1>that your guests will be right. Right, So all the

0:35:35.760 --> 0:35:37.480
<v Speaker 1>above or none of the above, if you really have

0:35:37.520 --> 0:35:40.080
<v Speaker 1>no idea about that, I would I would say pick

0:35:40.160 --> 0:35:43.880
<v Speaker 1>that one. Um. That's weird though, because later on he

0:35:43.960 --> 0:35:46.760
<v Speaker 1>says he says so first he says, ignore conventional wisdom,

0:35:47.040 --> 0:35:49.840
<v Speaker 1>but then later on the one piece of conventional wisdom

0:35:49.880 --> 0:35:54.200
<v Speaker 1>I've always heard, um he says, is actually true. That

0:35:54.360 --> 0:35:57.040
<v Speaker 1>is that you want to choose the longest answer on

0:35:57.080 --> 0:36:01.359
<v Speaker 1>any multiple choice test, right, Because if if you are

0:36:01.680 --> 0:36:04.799
<v Speaker 1>saying something's true, most of the time you have to

0:36:04.880 --> 0:36:09.560
<v Speaker 1>add qualifying language to make it absolutely true, because you

0:36:09.600 --> 0:36:11.319
<v Speaker 1>don't want somebody come back and be like, well, that's

0:36:11.320 --> 0:36:14.480
<v Speaker 1>actually not quite true. So when you start adding qualifying

0:36:14.560 --> 0:36:17.880
<v Speaker 1>language into an answer, it gets longer than the other ones,

0:36:18.360 --> 0:36:20.759
<v Speaker 1>and the the test writers probably not going to go

0:36:20.800 --> 0:36:25.399
<v Speaker 1>to the trouble of making the wrong answers similarly long.

0:36:26.160 --> 0:36:29.960
<v Speaker 1>So the longest answer is very frequently the correct answer. Yeah,

0:36:29.960 --> 0:36:31.840
<v Speaker 1>I thought that one was a really good piece of advice.

0:36:32.120 --> 0:36:34.480
<v Speaker 1>That's the one I always heard. That's really the only

0:36:34.520 --> 0:36:39.839
<v Speaker 1>one I've ever known. Really, did you remember scantron sheets? Yeah?

0:36:40.200 --> 0:36:44.439
<v Speaker 1>Did you ever? Were you ever so recklessly wild that

0:36:44.480 --> 0:36:47.400
<v Speaker 1>you like, made a Christmas tree out of a test?

0:36:48.680 --> 0:36:51.719
<v Speaker 1>Did you ever have the gall to do that? Oh?

0:36:51.760 --> 0:36:54.319
<v Speaker 1>I think never did bad because there are kids that

0:36:54.360 --> 0:36:56.640
<v Speaker 1>listen to this. But I had to take a test

0:36:56.680 --> 0:36:58.759
<v Speaker 1>one time that was not for school, but it was

0:36:58.840 --> 0:37:01.719
<v Speaker 1>something I didn't want to do. I won't get into

0:37:01.760 --> 0:37:07.879
<v Speaker 1>the details, but I made a big snake and it

0:37:07.960 --> 0:37:10.080
<v Speaker 1>was bad. And I looked back and I'm ashamed of it.

0:37:10.120 --> 0:37:13.839
<v Speaker 1>I made a mockery of their process. Uh. And I

0:37:13.920 --> 0:37:15.920
<v Speaker 1>wasn't that kind of kid. I don't know what happened.

0:37:15.960 --> 0:37:17.960
<v Speaker 1>I was generally a good kid and a good student.

0:37:18.320 --> 0:37:20.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm surprised to hear this, I know, but it sticks.

0:37:20.840 --> 0:37:23.200
<v Speaker 1>It's I feel so bad. It's still really stands out

0:37:23.239 --> 0:37:25.960
<v Speaker 1>in my mind. Is what a jerk move that was

0:37:26.040 --> 0:37:28.920
<v Speaker 1>on my part. I'm not only surprised, though, Chuck, I'm

0:37:28.920 --> 0:37:34.560
<v Speaker 1>a little delighted. Good a outed myself. Um alright, So

0:37:35.040 --> 0:37:38.680
<v Speaker 1>one of the other pieces of advice from Dr pound Stone, Doctor,

0:37:38.920 --> 0:37:42.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't think he's no doctor. He did write a book, though,

0:37:42.960 --> 0:37:46.920
<v Speaker 1>it's called Rock Breaks Scissors colon. Why does everything you

0:37:46.920 --> 0:37:49.680
<v Speaker 1>have to have a colon? Now it makes it smarter?

0:37:50.440 --> 0:37:53.640
<v Speaker 1>Rock Breaks Scissors Colin a practical guide outguessing and outwitting

0:37:53.640 --> 0:37:56.600
<v Speaker 1>almost everybody. One of his other ones is to look

0:37:56.600 --> 0:37:59.440
<v Speaker 1>at the surrounding answers because he's found the correct answer.

0:38:00.080 --> 0:38:04.279
<v Speaker 1>Choices are rarely repeated consecutively, so you rarely get two

0:38:04.320 --> 0:38:06.839
<v Speaker 1>b s in a row as the answer. So if

0:38:06.840 --> 0:38:09.160
<v Speaker 1>you definitely know the answer in front of it and

0:38:09.160 --> 0:38:11.920
<v Speaker 1>the answer behind it, then it's probably not one of

0:38:11.960 --> 0:38:14.439
<v Speaker 1>those two. So if you've you've just whittled down your

0:38:14.440 --> 0:38:20.840
<v Speaker 1>options yep. Advice No, not not bad at all. What else? Um?

0:38:20.960 --> 0:38:24.080
<v Speaker 1>And the last one he's got eliminate the outliers. If

0:38:24.080 --> 0:38:28.080
<v Speaker 1>there's anything that that seems like it doesn't really fit

0:38:28.160 --> 0:38:30.719
<v Speaker 1>with the rest of the stuff, you can automatically get

0:38:30.800 --> 0:38:34.160
<v Speaker 1>rid of that. And then conversely, if there's anything if

0:38:34.200 --> 0:38:38.600
<v Speaker 1>there are two answers that seem extremely close, they probably

0:38:38.640 --> 0:38:40.920
<v Speaker 1>can be gotten rid of as well, because it's the

0:38:40.960 --> 0:38:45.120
<v Speaker 1>same thing basically, So if you have say five, five

0:38:46.160 --> 0:38:49.759
<v Speaker 1>potential answers, and one of them doesn't fit with the

0:38:49.800 --> 0:38:51.800
<v Speaker 1>other four, get rid of that. Two of them are similar.

0:38:51.840 --> 0:38:53.640
<v Speaker 1>Get rid of those two. You're down to two. You

0:38:53.719 --> 0:38:56.480
<v Speaker 1>got a chance of getting at right. Yeah, I thought

0:38:56.560 --> 0:38:58.799
<v Speaker 1>the example they used in here was pretty fascinating because

0:38:58.800 --> 0:39:01.239
<v Speaker 1>they didn't even use the question sen or give the

0:39:01.360 --> 0:39:04.520
<v Speaker 1>question on this s a T practice test. They just

0:39:04.560 --> 0:39:10.040
<v Speaker 1>give the answer for A, B, C, D haphazard, uh

0:39:10.280 --> 0:39:14.160
<v Speaker 1>is too radical, inherent is to controversial, improvises to startling,

0:39:14.160 --> 0:39:18.279
<v Speaker 1>methodical is the revolutionary derivative is to gradual. And if

0:39:18.280 --> 0:39:23.480
<v Speaker 1>you just look at the right hand side, you have radical, controversial, startling, revolutionary,

0:39:23.520 --> 0:39:27.399
<v Speaker 1>and gradual, and obviously gradual stands out is just being

0:39:27.440 --> 0:39:31.480
<v Speaker 1>different than those other words. Right, radical, controversial, startling, revolutionary,

0:39:31.600 --> 0:39:34.879
<v Speaker 1>gradual doesn't makes sense, right, So that makes I mean,

0:39:34.920 --> 0:39:37.359
<v Speaker 1>that's really a good piece of advice. And then if

0:39:37.400 --> 0:39:39.920
<v Speaker 1>you look on the left hand side for A and C,

0:39:40.160 --> 0:39:44.080
<v Speaker 1>haphazard and improvised are really close. So he says you

0:39:44.080 --> 0:39:47.840
<v Speaker 1>should eliminate those two as well. Yea, I wish I

0:39:47.840 --> 0:39:49.920
<v Speaker 1>would have had this kind of advice for the S

0:39:49.960 --> 0:39:52.160
<v Speaker 1>A T. Well, I'll tell you what. That's an actual

0:39:52.360 --> 0:39:54.719
<v Speaker 1>s A T set of answers. So if you ever

0:39:54.840 --> 0:40:01.520
<v Speaker 1>run into haphazard, radical, inherent, controversial, improvised, startling, methodical revolutionary

0:40:01.800 --> 0:40:06.600
<v Speaker 1>and derivative gradual. You want to go with the methodical revolutionary,

0:40:06.600 --> 0:40:10.000
<v Speaker 1>and we just got you into college. You ever wanted

0:40:10.000 --> 0:40:14.880
<v Speaker 1>to take the s A T again? Like? Now, no, no,

0:40:15.080 --> 0:40:18.680
<v Speaker 1>that's funny. I really don't. I've never wanted to. I was.

0:40:18.800 --> 0:40:21.279
<v Speaker 1>I've been glad since the moment I finished that test

0:40:21.360 --> 0:40:23.719
<v Speaker 1>that I was done. I only took it twice. I

0:40:23.800 --> 0:40:26.439
<v Speaker 1>took it once and I was like, good enough. Yeah,

0:40:26.440 --> 0:40:28.759
<v Speaker 1>I took it twice. I did not score very well

0:40:28.800 --> 0:40:32.839
<v Speaker 1>the first time, and I scored pretty well the second time,

0:40:33.600 --> 0:40:34.920
<v Speaker 1>and I was like, I don't want to know which

0:40:34.960 --> 0:40:37.640
<v Speaker 1>one is the real me, I said, So I'm done. Yeah,

0:40:37.680 --> 0:40:40.400
<v Speaker 1>I scored blandly the first time, and I was like,

0:40:40.760 --> 0:40:44.279
<v Speaker 1>that's fine, that's fine, that's fine. I'll get by on

0:40:44.400 --> 0:40:47.680
<v Speaker 1>my my wits and real life skills. Look at you.

0:40:47.680 --> 0:40:51.520
<v Speaker 1>You've done great. I've done okay. Um, so you want

0:40:51.520 --> 0:40:53.839
<v Speaker 1>to talk about rock paper scissors a little bit? Yeah?

0:40:53.880 --> 0:40:56.920
<v Speaker 1>I thought this was awesome. Our friends over at motherboard

0:40:57.000 --> 0:40:58.440
<v Speaker 1>and we can say that because we used to have

0:40:58.520 --> 0:41:03.640
<v Speaker 1>a short lived call him on motherboard from vice yep um.

0:41:03.760 --> 0:41:08.680
<v Speaker 1>They have a German outfit called appropriately Motherboard Germany. And

0:41:08.760 --> 0:41:11.920
<v Speaker 1>they ran a post um called win at Rock paper

0:41:11.960 --> 0:41:16.600
<v Speaker 1>Scissors every Time with math colon what's with the colon's

0:41:18.320 --> 0:41:22.960
<v Speaker 1>And they basically got into how using game theory, you

0:41:23.000 --> 0:41:26.600
<v Speaker 1>can win at rock paper scissors basically all the time. Yeah,

0:41:26.680 --> 0:41:28.800
<v Speaker 1>they did, uh, or they didn't do the research, but

0:41:28.840 --> 0:41:32.200
<v Speaker 1>they got together with some researchers at the University of

0:41:32.239 --> 0:41:36.640
<v Speaker 1>hang Zoo in China, and um, they got three hundred

0:41:36.680 --> 0:41:42.280
<v Speaker 1>and sixties students to pair up and play three hundred

0:41:42.400 --> 0:41:46.520
<v Speaker 1>rounds each of rock paper scissors. Uh. And then they

0:41:46.920 --> 0:41:51.200
<v Speaker 1>tracked that please please let us stop, and they said, no,

0:41:51.880 --> 0:41:55.799
<v Speaker 1>this is communist China. Do it again again. Uh. So

0:41:55.880 --> 0:42:00.279
<v Speaker 1>they charted all those out and then summarized it with

0:42:00.360 --> 0:42:02.520
<v Speaker 1>some strategies. I don't know if this would you would

0:42:02.520 --> 0:42:07.480
<v Speaker 1>win every time? No, I mean there's always like the

0:42:07.520 --> 0:42:10.719
<v Speaker 1>what they call in rock paper says, there's the October

0:42:10.760 --> 0:42:14.560
<v Speaker 1>surprise where somebody just pulls something out of nowhere. Well,

0:42:14.680 --> 0:42:20.279
<v Speaker 1>so I mean a kid dynamite, right, Yeah, those are

0:42:20.280 --> 0:42:24.560
<v Speaker 1>off shoots. Remember kids that would do those? Oh really yeah,

0:42:25.160 --> 0:42:31.279
<v Speaker 1>some interesting people. Yeah, they would add other other weapons. Basically, well,

0:42:31.360 --> 0:42:36.759
<v Speaker 1>the the um this the Motherboard article talks about UM,

0:42:36.800 --> 0:42:39.319
<v Speaker 1>there's this other guy who came up with, um, a

0:42:39.360 --> 0:42:44.400
<v Speaker 1>whole different variation of it. That's like five or twenty

0:42:44.480 --> 0:42:47.759
<v Speaker 1>six different different possible ones. I would never remember all

0:42:47.760 --> 0:42:50.839
<v Speaker 1>of them, No, how could you? But at least one

0:42:50.880 --> 0:42:54.719
<v Speaker 1>guy does. No one can remember things, yeah right, but

0:42:54.840 --> 0:42:57.359
<v Speaker 1>so so okay, there's a few things. And this this

0:42:57.760 --> 0:43:01.759
<v Speaker 1>falls in line with learning how to get better at guessing, um,

0:43:01.840 --> 0:43:04.160
<v Speaker 1>how many jelly beans are in a jar. If you

0:43:04.320 --> 0:43:06.759
<v Speaker 1>arm yourself with a little bit of fore knowledge, you

0:43:06.840 --> 0:43:10.160
<v Speaker 1>can better guess at what your opponent's gonna come at you.

0:43:10.200 --> 0:43:13.439
<v Speaker 1>Within a game of rock paper scissors. Starting with that,

0:43:13.520 --> 0:43:16.719
<v Speaker 1>men tend to open a game with rock. Of course

0:43:16.760 --> 0:43:20.520
<v Speaker 1>they do. Yeah, that's such a man thing, rock smash,

0:43:21.080 --> 0:43:24.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, right, So if you're if your opponent as

0:43:24.520 --> 0:43:28.640
<v Speaker 1>a man, um and there's a pretty good chance they're

0:43:28.640 --> 0:43:32.239
<v Speaker 1>going to come out with rock the first time, go paper. Yeah,

0:43:32.239 --> 0:43:36.120
<v Speaker 1>although they do say statistically the opening uh scissors is

0:43:36.640 --> 0:43:39.080
<v Speaker 1>the one that will win you the most games. But

0:43:39.200 --> 0:43:43.040
<v Speaker 1>I guess that's if you're not playing a man. I

0:43:43.080 --> 0:43:46.960
<v Speaker 1>guess they kind of counteract themselves or contradict themselves statistically.

0:43:46.960 --> 0:43:49.840
<v Speaker 1>More women play rock paper scissors, I guess is that true.

0:43:50.640 --> 0:43:53.080
<v Speaker 1>Here's what I thought. I don't think. So here's one.

0:43:53.120 --> 0:43:55.440
<v Speaker 1>I've been making a lot of this stuff up in

0:43:55.480 --> 0:43:59.080
<v Speaker 1>this episode. Um, here's here's one that I thought was

0:43:59.120 --> 0:44:01.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of funny. Basically, this is like the Babe Ruth move,

0:44:02.800 --> 0:44:06.399
<v Speaker 1>say what you're going to pick before the game, Like,

0:44:06.600 --> 0:44:09.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna pick scissors next, and then the persons like,

0:44:09.520 --> 0:44:11.759
<v Speaker 1>they're not gonna pick scissors, but you just psyched them out.

0:44:11.800 --> 0:44:14.560
<v Speaker 1>And when you throw scissors, baby, they're gonna be blown

0:44:14.600 --> 0:44:16.920
<v Speaker 1>away because they threw paper and they thought you were

0:44:16.920 --> 0:44:21.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna throw rocky. It's like that the Princess Bride. And

0:44:21.120 --> 0:44:24.040
<v Speaker 1>what part was that with the man sitting at the

0:44:24.080 --> 0:44:28.600
<v Speaker 1>place talking about the poison drink? Oh yeah, yeah, remember

0:44:28.719 --> 0:44:30.520
<v Speaker 1>like trying to get the other guy to drink the

0:44:30.520 --> 0:44:36.080
<v Speaker 1>poison drink? I wish Yeah, he was awesome. Uh inconceivable?

0:44:38.680 --> 0:44:41.880
<v Speaker 1>What is another strategy? Um to counter attacks? So if

0:44:41.920 --> 0:44:45.400
<v Speaker 1>you played scissors and your opponent plays rock on the

0:44:45.440 --> 0:44:49.040
<v Speaker 1>first move, uh, and they win, obviously the chance that

0:44:49.160 --> 0:44:52.360
<v Speaker 1>they h they have confidence now in that move, so

0:44:52.480 --> 0:44:54.640
<v Speaker 1>you might be able to guess that they will play

0:44:54.800 --> 0:44:57.480
<v Speaker 1>rock again because the chances are pretty high that they

0:44:57.480 --> 0:45:00.880
<v Speaker 1>will do. So, then you anticipate that play paper. So

0:45:00.920 --> 0:45:03.120
<v Speaker 1>basically it says, play the option that wasn't played in

0:45:03.120 --> 0:45:07.360
<v Speaker 1>the previous round. Right, And you can also mirror um

0:45:07.440 --> 0:45:11.399
<v Speaker 1>your opponent. Right, So if you just one around, play

0:45:11.680 --> 0:45:15.720
<v Speaker 1>what your opponent just played, because they probably are thinking

0:45:15.760 --> 0:45:18.360
<v Speaker 1>that you're going to play with the same gesture that

0:45:18.480 --> 0:45:21.279
<v Speaker 1>you won with a second ago, really throws them off.

0:45:21.320 --> 0:45:24.319
<v Speaker 1>So the idea is they're probably going to play the

0:45:24.360 --> 0:45:26.839
<v Speaker 1>same thing that they just won with and if you

0:45:26.880 --> 0:45:30.839
<v Speaker 1>one don't do that, and that'll frustrate them to that's

0:45:30.880 --> 0:45:36.480
<v Speaker 1>the rock paper scissors version of why you're hitting yourself.

0:45:36.360 --> 0:45:38.600
<v Speaker 1>If you get into that thing when you're you both

0:45:38.640 --> 0:45:40.560
<v Speaker 1>throw rock, and you throw rock again, you both throw

0:45:40.560 --> 0:45:44.480
<v Speaker 1>a rock and you keep that's when the psychological warfare starts,

0:45:44.520 --> 0:45:48.000
<v Speaker 1>like who's gonna break first and go with paper and

0:45:48.000 --> 0:45:51.640
<v Speaker 1>then ideally you go with scissors and you have thus

0:45:51.680 --> 0:45:59.280
<v Speaker 1>outsmarted your opponent. Right. So interesting, So we were talking, Um,

0:45:59.480 --> 0:46:01.960
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned that we were going to talk about apes, right, Yeah,

0:46:02.000 --> 0:46:05.640
<v Speaker 1>I didn't fully understand this, so maybe you can help me.

0:46:05.960 --> 0:46:10.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that um that science fully understands it.

0:46:10.840 --> 0:46:14.160
<v Speaker 1>But basically so so let me give you an example here. Okay,

0:46:14.239 --> 0:46:16.480
<v Speaker 1>we were talking about how the brain. They're trying to

0:46:16.520 --> 0:46:19.600
<v Speaker 1>figure out what regions of the brain are activated to

0:46:19.760 --> 0:46:23.120
<v Speaker 1>form like this cascade of thought that results in a guess. Right.

0:46:24.000 --> 0:46:27.440
<v Speaker 1>One of the things I ran across was one theory

0:46:27.520 --> 0:46:30.239
<v Speaker 1>of how we guess what other people are going to

0:46:30.280 --> 0:46:35.560
<v Speaker 1>do UM is through mirror neurons, where if we see

0:46:35.640 --> 0:46:38.960
<v Speaker 1>somebody doing something, our mirror neurons are activated and it

0:46:39.000 --> 0:46:41.160
<v Speaker 1>puts us in a mind of how we feel when

0:46:41.200 --> 0:46:46.440
<v Speaker 1>we're doing something, and we use that past experience and

0:46:46.480 --> 0:46:50.240
<v Speaker 1>that current sensation of Like the example I ran across

0:46:50.239 --> 0:46:53.200
<v Speaker 1>with somebody grabbing an apple to guess what the person

0:46:53.280 --> 0:46:57.319
<v Speaker 1>is going to do next. Right, So you would say, um, well,

0:46:57.360 --> 0:46:59.440
<v Speaker 1>I know most times when I grab an apple, I

0:46:59.520 --> 0:47:01.640
<v Speaker 1>take a bye it out of it because I'm usually hungry.

0:47:01.640 --> 0:47:03.600
<v Speaker 1>When I grab an apple, that's after I rub it

0:47:03.600 --> 0:47:05.879
<v Speaker 1>on my shirt to give it a nice shine. Right. Well,

0:47:05.920 --> 0:47:08.560
<v Speaker 1>that's that's just showboating. If you're gonna if you guess

0:47:08.640 --> 0:47:10.080
<v Speaker 1>the person is going to rub it on their shirt

0:47:10.120 --> 0:47:13.439
<v Speaker 1>first before taking a bite, that's showing off. But that's

0:47:13.480 --> 0:47:15.640
<v Speaker 1>so your mirror neurons are the part of your brain

0:47:15.719 --> 0:47:19.399
<v Speaker 1>that's triggered that that um that that sets that off right.

0:47:19.400 --> 0:47:22.560
<v Speaker 1>That gives you that the basis the foundation for making

0:47:22.560 --> 0:47:24.360
<v Speaker 1>a guess of what the person is going to do next.

0:47:24.880 --> 0:47:29.040
<v Speaker 1>And then it gets run through again that lens of

0:47:29.120 --> 0:47:32.560
<v Speaker 1>your past experience, your history, everything from how you were

0:47:32.640 --> 0:47:35.120
<v Speaker 1>raised to what you do with apples, to what you've

0:47:35.120 --> 0:47:37.520
<v Speaker 1>seen other people do with apples, and you come up

0:47:37.560 --> 0:47:42.280
<v Speaker 1>with a short list of possibilities of what the person

0:47:42.400 --> 0:47:44.680
<v Speaker 1>is going to do with that apple, and it includes

0:47:44.920 --> 0:47:48.080
<v Speaker 1>rubbating out on their shirt, taking a bite, putting it

0:47:48.120 --> 0:47:51.319
<v Speaker 1>away in a cupboard, throwing it at a wall. And

0:47:51.360 --> 0:47:54.040
<v Speaker 1>then you're going to pare down based on what you

0:47:54.080 --> 0:47:56.840
<v Speaker 1>know about that person, like is that person neat freak?

0:47:56.920 --> 0:48:00.000
<v Speaker 1>If so, they're probably going to put that apple away

0:48:00.000 --> 0:48:03.600
<v Speaker 1>in a cupboard, which who does that except for neat freaks?

0:48:03.880 --> 0:48:07.040
<v Speaker 1>And you may be right at at your guess, right, well,

0:48:07.080 --> 0:48:10.600
<v Speaker 1>they're definitely not wall throwers at least right right, because

0:48:12.160 --> 0:48:15.520
<v Speaker 1>yeah so if and that's that's how you that's how

0:48:15.560 --> 0:48:18.480
<v Speaker 1>Apparently that's one theory for how we make guesses, starting

0:48:18.480 --> 0:48:21.240
<v Speaker 1>from brain based, going through personal history and then making

0:48:21.280 --> 0:48:25.360
<v Speaker 1>the guests. And what some research found was that the

0:48:25.520 --> 0:48:29.160
<v Speaker 1>ultimately what we're doing here is called theory of mind

0:48:29.560 --> 0:48:34.719
<v Speaker 1>right where we are have a capability of bestowing the

0:48:34.840 --> 0:48:38.320
<v Speaker 1>idea that other people have thoughts and feelings on other people,

0:48:39.040 --> 0:48:42.279
<v Speaker 1>right that we it's so common to us that we

0:48:42.360 --> 0:48:45.440
<v Speaker 1>take it for granted that we can attribute mental states

0:48:45.480 --> 0:48:49.319
<v Speaker 1>to other people. But that's that's a pretty significant thing.

0:48:49.640 --> 0:48:52.000
<v Speaker 1>And for a very long time researchers thought that just

0:48:52.160 --> 0:48:55.520
<v Speaker 1>humans were capable of of that. But they found out

0:48:55.600 --> 0:48:58.440
<v Speaker 1>that no, actually some apes at the very least just

0:48:58.560 --> 0:49:02.000
<v Speaker 1>apes um and do the same thing. They can attribute

0:49:02.000 --> 0:49:05.800
<v Speaker 1>mental states like thoughts and feelings and emotions to other

0:49:05.920 --> 0:49:11.000
<v Speaker 1>apes UM. And that's that shows like a higher form

0:49:11.080 --> 0:49:13.799
<v Speaker 1>of reasoning. That was basically the gist of it. That

0:49:13.840 --> 0:49:16.920
<v Speaker 1>makes sense, And they found that true in chimpanzees, bonobo's

0:49:16.960 --> 0:49:21.080
<v Speaker 1>and orangutangs. H. That's pretty neat, it is, and one

0:49:21.080 --> 0:49:27.560
<v Speaker 1>of them so sa UM. Sasha Barren Cohen, his cousin

0:49:27.680 --> 0:49:31.960
<v Speaker 1>Simon Barren Cohen is one of the leaders in UM

0:49:32.000 --> 0:49:35.520
<v Speaker 1>in theory of mind. Yeah, we've talked about him before,

0:49:35.520 --> 0:49:38.239
<v Speaker 1>I remember, but UM. One of the one of the

0:49:38.239 --> 0:49:42.759
<v Speaker 1>big areas that it like influences is autism. UM that

0:49:42.840 --> 0:49:47.040
<v Speaker 1>that people with autism tend to have more difficulty attributing

0:49:47.360 --> 0:49:51.399
<v Speaker 1>mental states and theory of mind to other people than

0:49:51.600 --> 0:49:55.239
<v Speaker 1>people who don't have autism. Right, And but one of

0:49:55.280 --> 0:49:57.000
<v Speaker 1>the one of the ways that they find this out,

0:49:57.040 --> 0:49:58.680
<v Speaker 1>and I think one of the ways that they detect

0:49:58.719 --> 0:50:02.239
<v Speaker 1>autism and young kids is by attributing false beliefs to

0:50:02.320 --> 0:50:05.360
<v Speaker 1>other people. This is like an early part of human development.

0:50:05.360 --> 0:50:08.800
<v Speaker 1>And apparently apes are good at it too. Where you

0:50:08.920 --> 0:50:12.319
<v Speaker 1>are an observer, right, and you're watching a scene and

0:50:12.360 --> 0:50:16.200
<v Speaker 1>there's a little boy named Tommy, and Tommy comes in

0:50:16.200 --> 0:50:18.600
<v Speaker 1>the room and he grabs the three Musketeers off of

0:50:18.640 --> 0:50:21.720
<v Speaker 1>the kitchen counter, and he walks over to a chest

0:50:21.760 --> 0:50:23.520
<v Speaker 1>of drawers and he puts it in one of the

0:50:23.600 --> 0:50:27.080
<v Speaker 1>drawers and walks out of the room. Well, Sally comes in,

0:50:27.400 --> 0:50:31.640
<v Speaker 1>and the narrator says, Sally is really hungry for three musketeers.

0:50:31.680 --> 0:50:34.480
<v Speaker 1>She knows it was last on the table. Where is

0:50:34.480 --> 0:50:38.360
<v Speaker 1>she going to look for the three Musketeers? And people

0:50:38.680 --> 0:50:41.520
<v Speaker 1>with um with theory of mine, who are able to

0:50:41.520 --> 0:50:44.840
<v Speaker 1>attribute false beliefs to other people will say, well, Sally

0:50:44.880 --> 0:50:47.479
<v Speaker 1>is gonna go look on the table even though it's

0:50:47.520 --> 0:50:50.560
<v Speaker 1>not there any longer, because Tommy put it in the drawer.

0:50:51.680 --> 0:50:55.080
<v Speaker 1>You can know that Sally can believe something that's no

0:50:55.120 --> 0:50:58.040
<v Speaker 1>longer correct if you have trouble with theory of mind,

0:50:58.320 --> 0:51:02.400
<v Speaker 1>and specifically if you're testing for autism, um that child,

0:51:02.440 --> 0:51:04.920
<v Speaker 1>a child with autism might say, well, Sally's gonna go

0:51:04.960 --> 0:51:07.120
<v Speaker 1>look in the drawer, because that's where it is. They

0:51:07.120 --> 0:51:10.400
<v Speaker 1>have trouble attributing false beliefs to people. What's true is

0:51:10.440 --> 0:51:13.879
<v Speaker 1>true and everybody would know that. And that's one way

0:51:13.880 --> 0:51:15.680
<v Speaker 1>that they test for autism. And it has to do

0:51:15.760 --> 0:51:19.799
<v Speaker 1>a theory of mine. Interesting, isn't it. And it has

0:51:19.840 --> 0:51:22.480
<v Speaker 1>to do with guessing. It all has to do with guessing. Man,

0:51:23.440 --> 0:51:26.719
<v Speaker 1>you got anything else? Well, just that Tommy should uh

0:51:26.920 --> 0:51:31.840
<v Speaker 1>not be so uh touchy? Well, yeah, and like share

0:51:31.840 --> 0:51:35.319
<v Speaker 1>the three Musketeers, Yeah, you go around. Do you know

0:51:35.360 --> 0:51:38.880
<v Speaker 1>why three Musketeers are called that? I have no idea,

0:51:39.239 --> 0:51:42.520
<v Speaker 1>my friend. It used to be a Neopolitan candy that

0:51:42.600 --> 0:51:46.959
<v Speaker 1>came in three different pieces, chocolate, strawberry, and vanilla, and

0:51:47.239 --> 0:51:50.879
<v Speaker 1>they just went with chocolate after a while and kept

0:51:50.880 --> 0:51:55.960
<v Speaker 1>the name because why not. Yeah. Interesting, Well, that's it

0:51:56.000 --> 0:51:59.560
<v Speaker 1>about three Musketeers for today. And hey, Chuck, before we

0:51:59.640 --> 0:52:02.840
<v Speaker 1>go to listener mail, I want to give a huge

0:52:02.880 --> 0:52:08.280
<v Speaker 1>congratulations from us to Stephen and Jane, our buddies, the Bars,

0:52:08.320 --> 0:52:12.239
<v Speaker 1>on the birth of their firstborn child. Yeah, how about that.

0:52:12.680 --> 0:52:16.439
<v Speaker 1>Congratulations you guys. Good looking baby too. Yeah? Is they're

0:52:16.480 --> 0:52:20.920
<v Speaker 1>not all good looking? No, No, it's true, especially like

0:52:21.040 --> 0:52:23.840
<v Speaker 1>right after birth. And because they're New Yorkers, they walked

0:52:23.880 --> 0:52:27.600
<v Speaker 1>home from the hospital. Like, how great is that they

0:52:27.640 --> 0:52:29.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm surprised they didn't take the subway, but what you do?

0:52:30.360 --> 0:52:33.440
<v Speaker 1>It is they are pretty New York. It's awesome. But congratulations.

0:52:33.440 --> 0:52:38.280
<v Speaker 1>It's one congratulations Bars. Okay, well, since we said congratulations Bars,

0:52:38.320 --> 0:52:42.840
<v Speaker 1>it's time for listener mail. Yeah, this one was a

0:52:42.880 --> 0:52:46.520
<v Speaker 1>little long, but it's about registering to vote in Texas.

0:52:47.080 --> 0:52:49.800
<v Speaker 1>You got an email for Monica and her story goes

0:52:49.920 --> 0:52:53.040
<v Speaker 1>as such, Uh, two thousand thirteen to move from Alabama

0:52:53.080 --> 0:52:55.560
<v Speaker 1>to Texas. Had a really horrific time trying to register

0:52:55.600 --> 0:52:57.640
<v Speaker 1>to vote where I went to the county clerk's office.

0:52:57.680 --> 0:53:00.000
<v Speaker 1>I looked online to check what I needed, downloaded the

0:53:00.040 --> 0:53:02.440
<v Speaker 1>application so I could have filled out in advance. It

0:53:02.520 --> 0:53:07.040
<v Speaker 1>took my Alabama driver's license, my lease, my birth certificate,

0:53:07.400 --> 0:53:11.479
<v Speaker 1>and because I'm divorced, my divorce decree stipulating my legal

0:53:11.560 --> 0:53:14.320
<v Speaker 1>name change. You'd probably think that would be else you needed,

0:53:14.400 --> 0:53:17.200
<v Speaker 1>right right, no. No. Once I got there, I was

0:53:17.239 --> 0:53:20.080
<v Speaker 1>told that the lease was not sufficient to prove residency

0:53:20.080 --> 0:53:21.759
<v Speaker 1>and that I would need to bring two pieces of

0:53:21.760 --> 0:53:25.319
<v Speaker 1>official mail, like utility bill, tax bill. So I leave

0:53:25.360 --> 0:53:27.080
<v Speaker 1>after spending the better part of a day waiting in

0:53:27.160 --> 0:53:30.080
<v Speaker 1>line waiting UH for my power and gas bill to

0:53:30.160 --> 0:53:32.200
<v Speaker 1>come in order to add the other documents. A couple

0:53:32.200 --> 0:53:34.280
<v Speaker 1>of weeks later, with all of the documents in hand,

0:53:34.600 --> 0:53:36.759
<v Speaker 1>I took another day off work went back to try again.

0:53:36.840 --> 0:53:39.719
<v Speaker 1>This time, the clerk looks over the divorce decree and

0:53:39.719 --> 0:53:42.840
<v Speaker 1>notices my name change wasn't to go back to my

0:53:42.920 --> 0:53:46.560
<v Speaker 1>maiden name. This was a name change that was ordered

0:53:46.600 --> 0:53:49.520
<v Speaker 1>by a court in Alabama and explicitly spelled out in

0:53:49.560 --> 0:53:53.239
<v Speaker 1>a notarized document that the clerk was disputing its validity.

0:53:53.480 --> 0:53:55.160
<v Speaker 1>When I asked what the problem was, he said, well,

0:53:55.800 --> 0:53:58.080
<v Speaker 1>that's in Alabama. If you want to that to be

0:53:58.120 --> 0:54:00.279
<v Speaker 1>your official name in Texas, you have to go through

0:54:00.320 --> 0:54:05.840
<v Speaker 1>the courts. UH, have a a draw at noon in

0:54:05.880 --> 0:54:09.319
<v Speaker 1>the center of town with a judge, a shootout. What's

0:54:09.320 --> 0:54:12.759
<v Speaker 1>that called a shot? A quick draw? Now, he said,

0:54:12.760 --> 0:54:14.040
<v Speaker 1>you'll have to go through the courts and have it

0:54:14.080 --> 0:54:17.680
<v Speaker 1>declared here in Texas. After literally blinking at him silently

0:54:17.680 --> 0:54:20.200
<v Speaker 1>with my mouth agape for a moment, I said, you're

0:54:20.200 --> 0:54:22.320
<v Speaker 1>telling me that the divorce in Alabama is a valid

0:54:22.360 --> 0:54:24.920
<v Speaker 1>because it was judicated in Alabama, that I am going

0:54:24.960 --> 0:54:26.720
<v Speaker 1>to have to go through the whole process of getting

0:54:27.080 --> 0:54:29.120
<v Speaker 1>a divorce again for it to be official in Texas.

0:54:29.280 --> 0:54:31.520
<v Speaker 1>That correct. His reply was, well, when you put it

0:54:31.560 --> 0:54:34.200
<v Speaker 1>that way, it sounds silly, but yes, though. I demanded

0:54:34.200 --> 0:54:37.279
<v Speaker 1>to speak with a supervisor. Clark got the supervisor, who

0:54:37.280 --> 0:54:39.839
<v Speaker 1>looked over everything and asked why I didn't just go

0:54:39.880 --> 0:54:43.160
<v Speaker 1>back to my maiden name, which I replied, it doesn't

0:54:43.200 --> 0:54:45.759
<v Speaker 1>matter what I changed my name to. You have the

0:54:45.800 --> 0:54:48.680
<v Speaker 1>official document, signed by a judge and notarized, and this

0:54:48.760 --> 0:54:51.960
<v Speaker 1>should be all you need because of the Constitution of

0:54:52.000 --> 0:54:56.360
<v Speaker 1>the United States that all judicial rulings and contracts that

0:54:56.400 --> 0:54:59.560
<v Speaker 1>are valid one state are valid in every state. At

0:54:59.600 --> 0:55:02.959
<v Speaker 1>that point, the clerk walked off. The supervisor said, okay,

0:55:03.280 --> 0:55:05.840
<v Speaker 1>gave my stuff to another clerk who simply smiled to

0:55:05.960 --> 0:55:09.120
<v Speaker 1>enter my application and took my check, uh, pointing me

0:55:09.160 --> 0:55:11.680
<v Speaker 1>toward the desk where I could get my picture taken. Uh.

0:55:11.719 --> 0:55:14.000
<v Speaker 1>And then she closes by saying, imagine how this would

0:55:14.000 --> 0:55:16.279
<v Speaker 1>have gone. I would have been an hourly worker, had

0:55:16.360 --> 0:55:19.600
<v Speaker 1>less of an understanding boss and not known about the

0:55:19.600 --> 0:55:22.720
<v Speaker 1>ins and outs of the constitution, or didn't have access

0:55:22.760 --> 0:55:24.799
<v Speaker 1>to all these documents. Chances are I would have been

0:55:24.840 --> 0:55:28.839
<v Speaker 1>disenfranchised driving around with an expired license. These laws are

0:55:28.880 --> 0:55:32.920
<v Speaker 1>absolutely created to suppress voter registration and participation, and they

0:55:32.960 --> 0:55:39.640
<v Speaker 1>work spectacularly well man, And that is Monica's story. Thanks Monica,

0:55:40.640 --> 0:55:44.320
<v Speaker 1>uh and welcome to Texas too. By the way, Yeah Um.

0:55:44.360 --> 0:55:46.520
<v Speaker 1>If you want to get in touch with this and

0:55:46.520 --> 0:55:49.200
<v Speaker 1>tell us a real life adventure that has something to

0:55:49.239 --> 0:55:51.359
<v Speaker 1>do with one of our episodes, we want to hear

0:55:51.400 --> 0:55:53.920
<v Speaker 1>about it, you can tweet to us. I'm at josh

0:55:54.000 --> 0:55:57.200
<v Speaker 1>Um Clark and at s y s K podcast on Twitter.

0:55:57.880 --> 0:55:59.879
<v Speaker 1>You can hang out with Chuck at Charles W. Chuck

0:56:00.040 --> 0:56:02.680
<v Speaker 1>Ran on Facebook or at Facebook dot com slash Stuff

0:56:02.680 --> 0:56:04.800
<v Speaker 1>you Should Know. You can send us an email the

0:56:04.840 --> 0:56:07.359
<v Speaker 1>Stuff podcast at how Stuff Works dot com and has

0:56:07.400 --> 0:56:09.600
<v Speaker 1>always joined us at at home on the web. Stuff

0:56:09.600 --> 0:56:14.360
<v Speaker 1>you Should Know dot Com. Stuff you Should Know is

0:56:14.360 --> 0:56:16.960
<v Speaker 1>a production of iHeart Radio's How Stuff Works. For more

0:56:17.000 --> 0:56:19.479
<v Speaker 1>podcasts for my Heart Radio, visit the iHeart radio, app,

0:56:19.560 --> 0:56:22.160
<v Speaker 1>Apple podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.

0:56:25.360 --> 0:56:25.400
<v Speaker 1>H