WEBVTT - MLB: Leading Off Sept 11th, 2023 (Ep. 737)

0:00:05.640 --> 0:00:08.600
<v Speaker 1>Welcome in everybody to Leading Off right here on Fantasy Pros.

0:00:08.720 --> 0:00:11.440
<v Speaker 1>I am Chris Welsh. That is Casey Bubba, and Leading

0:00:11.440 --> 0:00:14.000
<v Speaker 1>Off is brought to you by Prize Picks, Prize Picks

0:00:14.000 --> 0:00:17.200
<v Speaker 1>Promo code Leading Off. Get a one matchup to one

0:00:17.239 --> 0:00:20.319
<v Speaker 1>hundred bucks. Get your prize picking going. We're gonna be

0:00:20.320 --> 0:00:22.759
<v Speaker 1>doing that here in a little bit. Get going with baseball, football,

0:00:22.800 --> 0:00:25.400
<v Speaker 1>whatever it is. You can kind of combo them all together,

0:00:25.640 --> 0:00:29.160
<v Speaker 1>have the most fun with Prize Picks Promo Code Leading Off.

0:00:29.200 --> 0:00:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Welcome in to Monday, the final couple weeks. This is

0:00:34.120 --> 0:00:37.040
<v Speaker 1>like a guaranteed playoff week. I just want to point

0:00:37.080 --> 0:00:39.800
<v Speaker 1>that out. I feel like we've been had some nebulous

0:00:39.840 --> 0:00:43.240
<v Speaker 1>like wall. The playoffs could start here, they could start

0:00:43.280 --> 0:00:46.159
<v Speaker 1>over here sometimes the two everyone's in the playoffs. If

0:00:46.159 --> 0:00:49.199
<v Speaker 1>you're still around, if you're still listening to Fantasy Baseball,

0:00:49.240 --> 0:00:52.320
<v Speaker 1>you're in the playoffs. So, Bubba, how is your playoff push?

0:00:52.360 --> 0:00:54.400
<v Speaker 1>Your best ball push or roto push? How is it

0:00:54.400 --> 0:00:55.560
<v Speaker 1>all going right now?

0:00:55.880 --> 0:00:57.240
<v Speaker 2>It's going? Well, it's a grind.

0:00:57.920 --> 0:01:00.720
<v Speaker 3>I'm like, my draft and hold teams were great, and

0:01:00.800 --> 0:01:03.760
<v Speaker 3>they're just trying to put a lineup together that's not injured.

0:01:03.840 --> 0:01:06.240
<v Speaker 3>Right now is the fun part there? That same with

0:01:06.319 --> 0:01:10.160
<v Speaker 3>best balls, but we're grinding fab fab was fun this week.

0:01:10.200 --> 0:01:13.040
<v Speaker 3>We'll talk about that because some key players we lost

0:01:13.360 --> 0:01:16.360
<v Speaker 3>and teasing piece of them. But yeah, it's fun. It's

0:01:16.400 --> 0:01:17.880
<v Speaker 3>the grind. It's like lights at the end of the

0:01:17.880 --> 0:01:20.360
<v Speaker 3>tunnel and just power three for three more weeks.

0:01:20.560 --> 0:01:24.759
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I pushed two. Might I have like three big leagues?

0:01:24.800 --> 0:01:28.080
<v Speaker 1>Two of them pushed on, one got eliminated. There's the

0:01:28.080 --> 0:01:29.960
<v Speaker 1>best ball that you and I are in that you've

0:01:30.000 --> 0:01:32.040
<v Speaker 1>held the first place for the whole damn season. I

0:01:32.040 --> 0:01:34.360
<v Speaker 1>think I'm in third. Maybe maybe I'm four. I haven't

0:01:34.400 --> 0:01:35.119
<v Speaker 1>looked in a couple of days.

0:01:35.160 --> 0:01:36.560
<v Speaker 3>I look back at that roster and I'm like, I

0:01:36.560 --> 0:01:38.560
<v Speaker 3>wish I had this team every work. So just I

0:01:38.560 --> 0:01:40.240
<v Speaker 3>don't know, well, I don't know how I lucked into

0:01:40.240 --> 0:01:42.280
<v Speaker 3>that one, but that was Yeah, you're just wow.

0:01:42.720 --> 0:01:44.560
<v Speaker 1>But this is a great one right here. Like JP said,

0:01:44.600 --> 0:01:46.760
<v Speaker 1>this is the time of year. It's embrace the Grindeah,

0:01:46.800 --> 0:01:48.920
<v Speaker 1>the peanuts and cracker jacks, No JP knows. You got

0:01:48.920 --> 0:01:50.680
<v Speaker 1>to embrace the grind. That's the baseball is all about,

0:01:50.680 --> 0:01:52.800
<v Speaker 1>and that's what it's all about for you guys, hanging

0:01:52.800 --> 0:01:55.920
<v Speaker 1>out with us and hanging Here's the question of the year.

0:01:57.080 --> 0:02:01.120
<v Speaker 1>Question of the Year, September eleventh, Where is Joey p

0:02:02.440 --> 0:02:05.880
<v Speaker 1>Joe is not here? August rolls around, Joe goes away.

0:02:06.320 --> 0:02:08.320
<v Speaker 1>I do actually want to try to get Joe on

0:02:09.000 --> 0:02:11.720
<v Speaker 1>for like the last episode, maybe like the Three of

0:02:11.800 --> 0:02:15.440
<v Speaker 1>Us or something like that. But Joe disappears for a

0:02:15.440 --> 0:02:18.600
<v Speaker 1>football season, which was a crazy weekend. I did get

0:02:18.600 --> 0:02:20.520
<v Speaker 1>to see Joe for a little bit. I'll suit it up.

0:02:21.760 --> 0:02:23.520
<v Speaker 1>But we are back to baseball. That's what we're here.

0:02:23.520 --> 0:02:25.360
<v Speaker 1>We're back to baseball. We're going to be covering all

0:02:25.400 --> 0:02:28.960
<v Speaker 1>the latest news. We're going to be talking about the

0:02:29.080 --> 0:02:31.440
<v Speaker 1>best bets. We've got some dfs. We're going to be

0:02:31.440 --> 0:02:34.440
<v Speaker 1>getting into really everything we can at best to try

0:02:34.480 --> 0:02:37.639
<v Speaker 1>to prepare you for what's going down and the biggest news.

0:02:37.680 --> 0:02:39.799
<v Speaker 1>There's a couple actually big pieces of news here and there,

0:02:39.880 --> 0:02:43.720
<v Speaker 1>prospect related that we found out on Sunday when we

0:02:43.720 --> 0:02:47.520
<v Speaker 1>were giveth Jason Dimingez. We were taketh Jason Dimingez because

0:02:47.560 --> 0:02:50.880
<v Speaker 1>Jason Dimingez has been diagnosed with a torn ucl in

0:02:50.960 --> 0:02:55.520
<v Speaker 1>his right elbow that is going to require surgery. Now

0:02:55.720 --> 0:02:58.840
<v Speaker 1>they're saying it's going to be Tommy John. This is

0:02:58.840 --> 0:03:02.280
<v Speaker 1>where things get a little bit confusing. Bubba for rest

0:03:02.320 --> 0:03:05.119
<v Speaker 1>of season. You're done. You're done with Jason Dominguez. Don't

0:03:05.120 --> 0:03:07.959
<v Speaker 1>worry about it. You cut in redraft dynasty, you don't

0:03:08.040 --> 0:03:10.799
<v Speaker 1>do anything. You actually are relatively happy about.

0:03:10.560 --> 0:03:11.320
<v Speaker 2>Training us stuff.

0:03:11.320 --> 0:03:15.480
<v Speaker 1>You can except this that in the past, we've seen

0:03:15.520 --> 0:03:17.960
<v Speaker 1>some hitters that have had some Tommy John surgeries and

0:03:18.800 --> 0:03:23.040
<v Speaker 1>the perception was six months recovery, you could start to

0:03:23.120 --> 0:03:26.160
<v Speaker 1>hit again, which would maybe lead to Jason Dimingez being

0:03:26.200 --> 0:03:29.400
<v Speaker 1>ready for the start of the season, except Yankees manager

0:03:29.400 --> 0:03:32.640
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Boone told reporters that the recovery will likely be

0:03:32.800 --> 0:03:37.040
<v Speaker 1>nine to ten months, which probably puts him out for

0:03:37.200 --> 0:03:40.120
<v Speaker 1>half of the season next year, going to destroy Rookie

0:03:40.160 --> 0:03:43.080
<v Speaker 1>of the year odds, really going to destroy any ability

0:03:43.120 --> 0:03:46.120
<v Speaker 1>to wanting to pick him up. So I don't like,

0:03:46.680 --> 0:03:49.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I guess once we know more is where

0:03:49.040 --> 0:03:51.560
<v Speaker 1>we can start to take this approach. But he's not

0:03:51.600 --> 0:03:53.680
<v Speaker 1>going to be a target or draftable if he's going

0:03:53.720 --> 0:03:55.160
<v Speaker 1>to be missing the first half of the year.

0:03:56.000 --> 0:03:57.640
<v Speaker 3>No, he's basically going to be like this past year,

0:03:57.680 --> 0:04:00.920
<v Speaker 3>we got Bryce Harper, we got Trevor's story, like probably

0:04:00.920 --> 0:04:02.920
<v Speaker 3>more of the Harper Rock because Harper was thinking mid season,

0:04:03.040 --> 0:04:05.560
<v Speaker 3>so we're expecting from him, and he saw on drafts

0:04:05.560 --> 0:04:07.960
<v Speaker 3>where people that wanted to take the risk took him

0:04:08.000 --> 0:04:10.400
<v Speaker 3>other drafts, he just fell and fell and fell, And

0:04:10.600 --> 0:04:12.120
<v Speaker 3>I didn't get any shares of Harper and I want

0:04:12.160 --> 0:04:13.960
<v Speaker 3>to have any shares of Domingos. It's just it's a shame.

0:04:14.680 --> 0:04:16.320
<v Speaker 3>We enjoyed the week He was my home run call

0:04:16.440 --> 0:04:17.040
<v Speaker 3>over the weekend.

0:04:17.120 --> 0:04:18.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, like it was.

0:04:18.680 --> 0:04:21.239
<v Speaker 3>The kid was amazing to watch and to see that happen.

0:04:21.320 --> 0:04:23.920
<v Speaker 3>But he's so young, it makes sense. Go get the

0:04:23.960 --> 0:04:26.279
<v Speaker 3>full surgery, don't don't mess around with the brace, don't

0:04:26.320 --> 0:04:28.599
<v Speaker 3>do like to get the surgery, see what happens, and

0:04:28.600 --> 0:04:29.280
<v Speaker 3>hopefully we get.

0:04:29.240 --> 0:04:30.480
<v Speaker 2>Him for re least a couple of months in twenty

0:04:30.480 --> 0:04:30.920
<v Speaker 2>twenty four.

0:04:31.040 --> 0:04:33.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, So, like I suppose there might be some This

0:04:33.800 --> 0:04:36.839
<v Speaker 1>is what stinks is like we were talking about, you know,

0:04:36.880 --> 0:04:38.280
<v Speaker 1>I was talking about him being like a top one

0:04:38.320 --> 0:04:40.240
<v Speaker 1>hundred guy. You know, he could potentially be a top

0:04:40.279 --> 0:04:43.440
<v Speaker 1>one hundred player drafted next season. Now you're at the

0:04:43.480 --> 0:04:45.839
<v Speaker 1>point of like maybe you draft in stash, you know,

0:04:45.880 --> 0:04:48.760
<v Speaker 1>you draft him, you put him on your il and

0:04:48.800 --> 0:04:51.479
<v Speaker 1>then you just hope everything comes back into full recovery

0:04:51.520 --> 0:04:54.440
<v Speaker 1>and that, you know, I just wonder what that's going

0:04:54.520 --> 0:04:55.800
<v Speaker 1>to do to where he was going to be in

0:04:55.839 --> 0:04:57.640
<v Speaker 1>the lineup, Like the dude is hitting three. I think

0:04:57.680 --> 0:04:59.480
<v Speaker 1>there was a legit shot we could have been seeing

0:04:59.520 --> 0:05:02.080
<v Speaker 1>him hit three next season. Now it's going to be

0:05:02.120 --> 0:05:06.120
<v Speaker 1>like slower recovery time, rehabs, stants and everything. So I

0:05:06.160 --> 0:05:09.120
<v Speaker 1>don't know. I think it's brutal. But the giveth, the

0:05:09.160 --> 0:05:12.360
<v Speaker 1>true giveth, is Jason Dominguez taken away by the baseball gods.

0:05:12.560 --> 0:05:15.719
<v Speaker 1>They bring us Pete Crow Armstrong. He has he is

0:05:15.839 --> 0:05:19.040
<v Speaker 1>finally here, he has risen. I've been waiting for him.

0:05:19.279 --> 0:05:21.320
<v Speaker 1>I've been calling this all season. This has been one

0:05:21.360 --> 0:05:25.600
<v Speaker 1>of my favorites. Twenty homers in the Miners, thirty seven

0:05:25.760 --> 0:05:29.000
<v Speaker 1>in a row, stolen bases tw eighty nine at Double A,

0:05:29.320 --> 0:05:32.960
<v Speaker 1>two seventy one at Triple A, had a mirrored nine

0:05:33.000 --> 0:05:36.359
<v Speaker 1>percent walk right up both stops. His k's did pop

0:05:36.440 --> 0:05:38.800
<v Speaker 1>up a little bit in Triple A, but I mean

0:05:38.880 --> 0:05:41.640
<v Speaker 1>he fell just short Bubba of one hundred runs, he

0:05:41.680 --> 0:05:44.280
<v Speaker 1>had eighty eight RBI. He did this all in roughly

0:05:44.440 --> 0:05:48.120
<v Speaker 1>one hundred and seven games in the Miners, He's now

0:05:48.160 --> 0:05:50.400
<v Speaker 1>gonna come up as the Cubs are pushing. I think

0:05:50.400 --> 0:05:52.960
<v Speaker 1>they lost the series to the Diamondbacks. They're pushing, They're

0:05:52.960 --> 0:05:55.039
<v Speaker 1>going to get him in the lineup. I am a

0:05:55.160 --> 0:05:58.400
<v Speaker 1>huge fan of Pete Crow Armstrong. I thought this has

0:05:58.480 --> 0:06:01.520
<v Speaker 1>been one of the guys that you wanted to look at.

0:06:01.600 --> 0:06:04.240
<v Speaker 1>I think he's been criminally underrated, simply because there were

0:06:04.279 --> 0:06:08.000
<v Speaker 1>so many prospect people that were like, ah, there's nothing there,

0:06:08.040 --> 0:06:09.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, let's find that he can hit, because he

0:06:09.640 --> 0:06:12.560
<v Speaker 1>suffered from a big injury, but nobody early on. I mean,

0:06:12.600 --> 0:06:15.359
<v Speaker 1>obviously it has changed once he started producing for everybody,

0:06:15.480 --> 0:06:17.480
<v Speaker 1>but there weren't a lot of people that were signifying

0:06:18.160 --> 0:06:20.279
<v Speaker 1>what that really good talent was. He had a little

0:06:20.279 --> 0:06:23.360
<v Speaker 1>bit of an inflated ground ball rate at triple A.

0:06:23.440 --> 0:06:26.440
<v Speaker 1>His poll rate has been coming down at the last

0:06:26.440 --> 0:06:28.800
<v Speaker 1>three stops, but he hits the ball hard. He makes

0:06:28.880 --> 0:06:32.520
<v Speaker 1>consistent contact, and I'm not sure where your aggressiveness is.

0:06:32.520 --> 0:06:35.479
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if you lost amingas you've got to just

0:06:35.640 --> 0:06:37.920
<v Speaker 1>hopefully you could just rinse and repeat with Pete Crow.

0:06:38.360 --> 0:06:39.000
<v Speaker 2>That'd be the goal.

0:06:39.200 --> 0:06:41.159
<v Speaker 3>It's a shame this didn't have it on Sunday, so

0:06:41.160 --> 0:06:43.360
<v Speaker 3>you could added him before the Coer series. If you're

0:06:43.360 --> 0:06:46.039
<v Speaker 3>in a weekly format, that would have been fun. We

0:06:46.080 --> 0:06:48.240
<v Speaker 3>will talk more Pete Crow in a later segment, by

0:06:48.279 --> 0:06:50.600
<v Speaker 3>the way, but.

0:06:49.839 --> 0:06:50.520
<v Speaker 2>This is a good one.

0:06:50.560 --> 0:06:52.480
<v Speaker 3>It is a shame, as Wonky mentioned here, like I

0:06:52.520 --> 0:06:55.440
<v Speaker 3>was going to bring it up. Also is yeah, we

0:06:55.480 --> 0:06:57.440
<v Speaker 3>thought Pete would come up when like the others did

0:06:57.520 --> 0:07:00.400
<v Speaker 3>right before September first, so we postseason eligib books all

0:07:00.400 --> 0:07:02.520
<v Speaker 3>the quotes and everyone's like, oh, they're in a postseason push.

0:07:02.800 --> 0:07:04.000
<v Speaker 2>We want to bring our guy up.

0:07:04.080 --> 0:07:05.440
<v Speaker 3>But it's like, okay, cool, he gets you to the

0:07:05.440 --> 0:07:07.680
<v Speaker 3>postseason and now he can't play for you. So that's

0:07:07.760 --> 0:07:11.040
<v Speaker 3>kind of a weird situation there, but hey, get there

0:07:11.120 --> 0:07:12.800
<v Speaker 3>and I guess go dancing after that.

0:07:12.800 --> 0:07:14.040
<v Speaker 2>It'd be fun to see what he's got to do.

0:07:14.360 --> 0:07:18.040
<v Speaker 3>Definite replacement for Domingos for now, and it'll be fun

0:07:18.080 --> 0:07:18.400
<v Speaker 3>to see.

0:07:18.640 --> 0:07:21.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's kind of like it's stupid, like both the

0:07:21.080 --> 0:07:24.520
<v Speaker 1>Diamondbacks and the Cubs are vying for this wild card spot.

0:07:24.680 --> 0:07:27.440
<v Speaker 1>They both bring up the two probably best well I

0:07:27.480 --> 0:07:29.880
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't say best eligible because you know, camin Arrow or

0:07:29.960 --> 0:07:33.080
<v Speaker 1>Cherio or Jackson Holiday, but like the two top prospects

0:07:33.120 --> 0:07:35.720
<v Speaker 1>coming up, and neither one of them are postseason eligible,

0:07:35.760 --> 0:07:37.960
<v Speaker 1>because I just think these were kind of stupid moves.

0:07:38.000 --> 0:07:39.600
<v Speaker 1>If you were going to bring the guys up, bring

0:07:39.640 --> 0:07:42.400
<v Speaker 1>them up so they could be postseason eligible, because that

0:07:42.920 --> 0:07:45.720
<v Speaker 1>won't affect their rookie status the playoffs as far as

0:07:45.720 --> 0:07:46.400
<v Speaker 1>I know, it shouldn't.

0:07:46.400 --> 0:07:46.920
<v Speaker 2>As far as.

0:07:46.920 --> 0:07:49.480
<v Speaker 1>Regular season stuff, yeah, I mean, it shouldn't have any

0:07:49.520 --> 0:07:52.560
<v Speaker 1>effect on it. So it's pretty silly. But Pete Crow

0:07:52.720 --> 0:07:54.920
<v Speaker 1>is that guy that you can just kind of pop

0:07:55.000 --> 0:07:58.800
<v Speaker 1>right in. So here's a question. Michael says worth dropping

0:07:58.840 --> 0:08:02.520
<v Speaker 1>any of Kasa's tour. Send Naylor or Naylor for Pete

0:08:02.520 --> 0:08:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Crow Armstrong, not Cossas or Torkalsen.

0:08:05.400 --> 0:08:08.480
<v Speaker 3>There's questionable because Naylor hasn't really bounced back since he

0:08:08.560 --> 0:08:10.640
<v Speaker 3>came back from the IL. He was playing really well before.

0:08:11.160 --> 0:08:14.040
<v Speaker 3>I still trust Naylor and the complaining time. But if

0:08:14.080 --> 0:08:15.440
<v Speaker 3>you want to, if you want to drop Naylor, I'm

0:08:15.440 --> 0:08:17.040
<v Speaker 3>fine with that. I wouldn't do it for Torker costs.

0:08:17.120 --> 0:08:19.640
<v Speaker 1>Yes, maybeeah, I agree, maybe Naylor, Like if you're trying

0:08:19.680 --> 0:08:22.600
<v Speaker 1>to chase stolen bases, you just can't drop Tor or Cossas.

0:08:22.960 --> 0:08:25.200
<v Speaker 1>Even if you're trying to chase chase stolen bases, it's

0:08:25.240 --> 0:08:27.080
<v Speaker 1>got to be somebody else. And by the way, that

0:08:27.160 --> 0:08:30.520
<v Speaker 1>is a reminder. Any fantasy questions you guys want, drop

0:08:30.640 --> 0:08:33.120
<v Speaker 1>them below in the chat if you are watching live,

0:08:33.240 --> 0:08:35.520
<v Speaker 1>not on the podcast, and we will try to answer

0:08:35.600 --> 0:08:38.520
<v Speaker 1>them in here. So for all you podcast listeners, you

0:08:38.640 --> 0:08:40.280
<v Speaker 1>still got time to come and hang out and see

0:08:40.280 --> 0:08:43.160
<v Speaker 1>Bubba's beautiful face. If you'd like to, just go to

0:08:43.240 --> 0:08:46.439
<v Speaker 1>YouTube dot com slash Fantasy Pros MLB I believe it is.

0:08:46.800 --> 0:08:49.400
<v Speaker 1>Make sure you subscribe those now. I'm a little disappointed

0:08:49.400 --> 0:08:53.240
<v Speaker 1>those little subscribe numbers. When you know football season came in,

0:08:53.360 --> 0:08:55.480
<v Speaker 1>people tapered off. Those numbers kind of went back down.

0:08:55.520 --> 0:08:58.760
<v Speaker 1>We were having Joe, we did Mustache Day, and we

0:08:58.840 --> 0:09:00.920
<v Speaker 1>were gonna have Joe where a big We're far away,

0:09:01.040 --> 0:09:02.800
<v Speaker 1>So just pointing out if you guys want to step

0:09:02.840 --> 0:09:03.319
<v Speaker 1>it back up.

0:09:04.040 --> 0:09:05.480
<v Speaker 2>If people want to show up, I don't have a

0:09:05.559 --> 0:09:06.040
<v Speaker 2>problem with it.

0:09:06.520 --> 0:09:07.920
<v Speaker 1>Did you ever see that, By the way, did you

0:09:07.960 --> 0:09:09.760
<v Speaker 1>see one one did?

0:09:09.840 --> 0:09:11.880
<v Speaker 2>Like a I saw a photoshop of Joe and a

0:09:11.920 --> 0:09:12.800
<v Speaker 2>wig and the whole thing.

0:09:12.880 --> 0:09:15.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well there's a photoshop. But Joe and I did

0:09:15.320 --> 0:09:18.320
<v Speaker 1>Mustache Day where when we hit fourteen thousand that, yeah,

0:09:18.360 --> 0:09:20.800
<v Speaker 1>we shaved and we did. I've got the picture out there.

0:09:20.840 --> 0:09:23.959
<v Speaker 1>It's it's pretty magnificent. My wife just discuss her. It

0:09:24.080 --> 0:09:28.679
<v Speaker 1>absolutely discussed her because she's not a mustache person. So

0:09:29.040 --> 0:09:32.560
<v Speaker 1>Pete Crow, I think he sits in the world similar

0:09:32.640 --> 0:09:34.439
<v Speaker 1>to a lot of these prospects. I mean, listen, Joe

0:09:34.520 --> 0:09:37.000
<v Speaker 1>Lawler's not working out. He's hitting like under one hundred.

0:09:37.320 --> 0:09:40.440
<v Speaker 1>He has gotten some higher opportunities in the lineup. There's

0:09:40.600 --> 0:09:43.120
<v Speaker 1>bad adjustments. So this is kind of what we talked about.

0:09:43.760 --> 0:09:46.839
<v Speaker 1>If these prospects show the early signs of hitting, I

0:09:46.880 --> 0:09:49.200
<v Speaker 1>don't think there's enough time to adjust, so great. If

0:09:49.200 --> 0:09:52.240
<v Speaker 1>they don't, you move on. Lawler's probably not doing it

0:09:52.280 --> 0:09:54.280
<v Speaker 1>to a level where we're comfortable, so you can move on.

0:09:54.400 --> 0:09:57.199
<v Speaker 1>I would move off of Lawler for Peek Crow to

0:09:57.240 --> 0:10:00.679
<v Speaker 1>see what he does. But I think Pete Crow toes

0:10:00.800 --> 0:10:04.880
<v Speaker 1>the line of the of the five outfielder twelve team

0:10:04.960 --> 0:10:06.559
<v Speaker 1>team right now. If you're trying to go with it,

0:10:06.640 --> 0:10:10.720
<v Speaker 1>and we'll answer any other questions that people got, let's

0:10:10.760 --> 0:10:11.360
<v Speaker 1>go next up.

0:10:11.440 --> 0:10:12.199
<v Speaker 2>This one was crazy.

0:10:12.679 --> 0:10:19.240
<v Speaker 1>So yesterday Corbyn Burns pitched eight hitless innings. Devin Williams

0:10:19.280 --> 0:10:21.680
<v Speaker 1>then comes in works A, one, two, three. Those are

0:10:21.760 --> 0:10:22.400
<v Speaker 1>still hitless.

0:10:22.440 --> 0:10:23.320
<v Speaker 2>By the way, the.

0:10:23.400 --> 0:10:27.040
<v Speaker 1>Yankees had two on in the tenth against Abner Uribay

0:10:27.559 --> 0:10:31.160
<v Speaker 1>Volpi hits a drive freelick, he makes this crazy catch

0:10:31.760 --> 0:10:34.440
<v Speaker 1>boom he knocks out like lights on a video board.

0:10:34.840 --> 0:10:40.120
<v Speaker 1>Milwaukee is two outs away from the first eleven inning

0:10:40.400 --> 0:10:44.400
<v Speaker 1>no hitter in Major League Baseball, and then Oswal Cabrera

0:10:44.520 --> 0:10:47.400
<v Speaker 1>comes in. He screws everything up. It's done. But we

0:10:47.640 --> 0:10:52.120
<v Speaker 1>had almost eleven innings of no hit ball, which is

0:10:52.240 --> 0:10:55.440
<v Speaker 1>an insanely incredible feat. Any thoughts on that, and maybe

0:10:55.520 --> 0:10:58.520
<v Speaker 1>more so how Corbin Burns is kind of ending out

0:10:58.600 --> 0:10:59.360
<v Speaker 1>the year right now.

0:10:59.640 --> 0:11:01.800
<v Speaker 3>It's very very impressive to be no hit for that

0:11:01.920 --> 0:11:04.600
<v Speaker 3>long and then not win the game, so that that's

0:11:04.720 --> 0:11:08.680
<v Speaker 3>fun as well. But yeah, Burns has been very good,

0:11:08.760 --> 0:11:11.959
<v Speaker 3>and I've been, uh, I guess not the biggest Burns fan.

0:11:11.960 --> 0:11:13.840
<v Speaker 3>I've always said he's been good. I think he gets

0:11:13.920 --> 0:11:17.439
<v Speaker 3>over overrated at times when there's other pitch Like I

0:11:17.480 --> 0:11:19.280
<v Speaker 3>just think Freddy Peeroult is pitching better than him in

0:11:19.280 --> 0:11:21.000
<v Speaker 3>the second half of the season, and I get a

0:11:21.000 --> 0:11:22.400
<v Speaker 3>lot of pushback on that because people.

0:11:22.320 --> 0:11:25.640
<v Speaker 1>Just Burns lovers Woodrof was kind of pitching better.

0:11:25.800 --> 0:11:27.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's I think because Bloomfield and I did it

0:11:27.920 --> 0:11:29.560
<v Speaker 3>a couple of weeks ago, and we rated him ourselves

0:11:29.640 --> 0:11:30.640
<v Speaker 3>per Alta Woodrift Burns.

0:11:30.679 --> 0:11:31.599
<v Speaker 2>That's how we did it.

0:11:31.920 --> 0:11:33.360
<v Speaker 3>And then we did a poll online and it was

0:11:33.400 --> 0:11:36.439
<v Speaker 3>complete opposite Burns, like eighty percent all the way. So

0:11:37.240 --> 0:11:39.400
<v Speaker 3>I'm still I'm thinking Burn's pitching great. I'm really curious

0:11:39.400 --> 0:11:41.280
<v Speaker 3>to see where he goes this offseason. It's not gonna

0:11:41.280 --> 0:11:45.199
<v Speaker 3>be Milwaukee. No, they're not gonna pay gone. Yeah, so

0:11:45.600 --> 0:11:48.040
<v Speaker 3>that'll make it interesting as well, because he's finishing strong,

0:11:48.080 --> 0:11:50.000
<v Speaker 3>he's gonna make some more cash. He's making fantasy people

0:11:50.000 --> 0:11:52.360
<v Speaker 3>happy when it matters the most. He just he's just

0:11:52.440 --> 0:11:54.480
<v Speaker 3>not as dominant as he was to get the high

0:11:54.559 --> 0:11:56.360
<v Speaker 3>draft cost of it. But that's kind of what I'm

0:11:56.360 --> 0:11:58.400
<v Speaker 3>trying to say. He's not that dominant guy anymore.

0:11:58.600 --> 0:12:00.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, by the way, it'll be like the Dodgers, he'll go,

0:12:01.040 --> 0:12:02.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, because the Dodgers are a disaster right now.

0:12:03.080 --> 0:12:06.360
<v Speaker 2>It's well, we just don't they need pitching so bad.

0:12:06.400 --> 0:12:07.880
<v Speaker 2>We'll talk about them later on the show too.

0:12:07.920 --> 0:12:09.840
<v Speaker 3>But I've been it seems every time I do an

0:12:09.920 --> 0:12:11.599
<v Speaker 3>update show kind of like this for my other on

0:12:11.720 --> 0:12:14.600
<v Speaker 3>what stuff, here's a new dodger or pitcher going down

0:12:14.679 --> 0:12:16.240
<v Speaker 3>or I knew this, or that it's insane.

0:12:16.280 --> 0:12:17.320
<v Speaker 2>What has happened to the rotation?

0:12:17.559 --> 0:12:20.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, by the way, that that appearance at eleven almost

0:12:20.720 --> 0:12:23.920
<v Speaker 1>eleven hitting inning no hitter was the fourth time a

0:12:24.080 --> 0:12:27.800
<v Speaker 1>team was no hit into the eleventh and then one,

0:12:28.400 --> 0:12:31.480
<v Speaker 1>and the first since the Mets did it in nineteen

0:12:31.640 --> 0:12:34.400
<v Speaker 1>sixty five. So I thought that was an interesting note

0:12:34.440 --> 0:12:37.760
<v Speaker 1>that I believe that was according to ESPN, uh the Angels.

0:12:37.840 --> 0:12:40.880
<v Speaker 1>Apparently here's a report the Angels are open to trading

0:12:41.000 --> 0:12:43.200
<v Speaker 1>Mike Trout if he wants out. This is a report

0:12:43.240 --> 0:12:46.280
<v Speaker 1>that was on ESPN, and I think Trout was it

0:12:46.440 --> 0:12:48.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of talked about like let's just see what happens

0:12:48.640 --> 0:12:52.160
<v Speaker 1>into the offseason, which to me says trade me, which

0:12:52.280 --> 0:12:53.719
<v Speaker 1>means get me the hell out of here.

0:12:53.920 --> 0:12:55.599
<v Speaker 2>But that means is show hey back or not?

0:12:56.400 --> 0:12:58.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well show he is like clearly not back right now.

0:12:58.880 --> 0:13:01.680
<v Speaker 1>So not to spend too much time on it, because

0:13:02.040 --> 0:13:03.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, what expectation do we have of Mike Trout

0:13:03.920 --> 0:13:06.000
<v Speaker 1>even the rest of this season? But do you think

0:13:06.080 --> 0:13:09.040
<v Speaker 1>Mike Trout is going to request a trade from the

0:13:09.120 --> 0:13:11.840
<v Speaker 1>Angels and this team just completely is dismantled.

0:13:12.480 --> 0:13:12.680
<v Speaker 2>Yes.

0:13:12.880 --> 0:13:16.800
<v Speaker 3>Yes, actually, Jeff Ericson said it best that the Angels

0:13:16.800 --> 0:13:18.640
<v Speaker 3>are on the path of being the next Oakland Athletics

0:13:18.679 --> 0:13:20.960
<v Speaker 3>minus in the new stadium problem that the way they're

0:13:21.000 --> 0:13:23.640
<v Speaker 3>running this team, Trout's gonna be gone. The fun part

0:13:23.720 --> 0:13:26.960
<v Speaker 3>is going to be. His contract goes through twenty thirty one,

0:13:27.640 --> 0:13:30.959
<v Speaker 3>seven more years basically, and it's about thirty five to

0:13:31.080 --> 0:13:34.200
<v Speaker 3>forty million year, So the Angels will have to trade

0:13:34.280 --> 0:13:36.280
<v Speaker 3>him and take on cash, which will make it even

0:13:36.320 --> 0:13:36.959
<v Speaker 3>more entertaining.

0:13:37.120 --> 0:13:37.880
<v Speaker 2>So he's gone.

0:13:37.960 --> 0:13:41.040
<v Speaker 3>Trout will be gone, Yes, but how this all works out,

0:13:41.480 --> 0:13:43.080
<v Speaker 3>the Angels are gonna find way to screw this up

0:13:43.080 --> 0:13:43.400
<v Speaker 3>even more.

0:13:43.400 --> 0:13:46.360
<v Speaker 1>I have a feeling, yeah, I mean the problem is

0:13:46.760 --> 0:13:48.439
<v Speaker 1>why I think this will be so tough is like

0:13:48.559 --> 0:13:50.680
<v Speaker 1>they got to win. They got because the Angels they

0:13:50.720 --> 0:13:52.360
<v Speaker 1>don't win. They don't win in trades, they don't win

0:13:52.400 --> 0:13:52.920
<v Speaker 1>in baseball.

0:13:53.160 --> 0:13:54.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and they're gonna screw it up something.

0:13:54.440 --> 0:13:56.199
<v Speaker 1>They don't win in free agencies. So they got to

0:13:56.240 --> 0:13:59.000
<v Speaker 1>find a team that would be willing to like send

0:13:59.080 --> 0:14:00.839
<v Speaker 1>out a pack. They go to get something like the

0:14:00.920 --> 0:14:01.760
<v Speaker 1>Sodo package.

0:14:02.000 --> 0:14:03.199
<v Speaker 2>You know what I mean. They got a problem with

0:14:03.360 --> 0:14:05.319
<v Speaker 2>the problem with Trout is he's not the same Trouts.

0:14:05.360 --> 0:14:08.120
<v Speaker 3>He can't stay healthy like still went healthy, amazing player,

0:14:08.160 --> 0:14:09.920
<v Speaker 3>but I say when healthy for a reason, he's never

0:14:10.200 --> 0:14:11.040
<v Speaker 3>like fully healthy.

0:14:11.080 --> 0:14:11.440
<v Speaker 2>It's great.

0:14:11.600 --> 0:14:15.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's just like teams will still treat The Angels

0:14:15.320 --> 0:14:16.959
<v Speaker 1>are gonna probably like I'm telling you, I think it's

0:14:17.040 --> 0:14:20.520
<v Speaker 1>the Padres package. It's got to be like two future stars,

0:14:20.920 --> 0:14:22.680
<v Speaker 1>even if there is a ton of money attached, Like

0:14:22.760 --> 0:14:24.200
<v Speaker 1>they're going to have to figure out what to do

0:14:24.320 --> 0:14:27.160
<v Speaker 1>to throw money at. They've got to get like an

0:14:27.240 --> 0:14:28.600
<v Speaker 1>Abrams and a McKinsey core.

0:14:28.680 --> 0:14:29.480
<v Speaker 2>You know, they have to get.

0:14:29.640 --> 0:14:32.560
<v Speaker 3>You see the Yankees dealing like I don't think they

0:14:32.680 --> 0:14:34.680
<v Speaker 3>deal Jason, but could they deal a couple of their

0:14:34.760 --> 0:14:37.920
<v Speaker 3>big prospects for Trout to throw him with gian Carlo

0:14:38.000 --> 0:14:39.520
<v Speaker 3>and judging all them, Yeah.

0:14:39.320 --> 0:14:41.240
<v Speaker 1>I could see. But I think they might be worn,

0:14:41.520 --> 0:14:43.760
<v Speaker 1>like they they kind of also showed us with them

0:14:43.840 --> 0:14:46.080
<v Speaker 1>not being aggressive in trading and stuff like that that

0:14:46.120 --> 0:14:48.760
<v Speaker 1>I think they're worn from taking on the like Trout

0:14:48.880 --> 0:14:50.440
<v Speaker 1>is exactly one of those type of players.

0:14:50.480 --> 0:14:52.840
<v Speaker 2>So I'm I'm curious.

0:14:52.840 --> 0:14:54.280
<v Speaker 1>I really don't know. I mean, is there a team

0:14:54.320 --> 0:14:55.080
<v Speaker 1>that jumps out to you.

0:14:55.440 --> 0:14:57.520
<v Speaker 2>I think I'm curious because it's the financial part that

0:14:57.920 --> 0:14:58.400
<v Speaker 2>does it. To me.

0:14:58.480 --> 0:15:02.040
<v Speaker 3>The prospects you're necessary, So you think money, you think Mets,

0:15:02.080 --> 0:15:05.920
<v Speaker 3>but that's just been a disaster. It's tough to pinpoint

0:15:05.960 --> 0:15:07.920
<v Speaker 3>a team that's going to spend the cash to bring

0:15:08.040 --> 0:15:09.160
<v Speaker 3>him in type situation.

0:15:08.880 --> 0:15:10.480
<v Speaker 1>That would make a lot of sense. So we'll we'll

0:15:10.520 --> 0:15:11.160
<v Speaker 1>get to speculation.

0:15:11.160 --> 0:15:13.360
<v Speaker 2>You see, whoever doesn't get show, hey probably goes after

0:15:13.480 --> 0:15:13.960
<v Speaker 2>Mike Trout.

0:15:14.480 --> 0:15:16.760
<v Speaker 1>Angela says Trout to the Savanna Bananas.

0:15:17.080 --> 0:15:19.200
<v Speaker 3>I'm sure Savanna Bana should face the Angels. I actually

0:15:19.200 --> 0:15:21.600
<v Speaker 3>said that on a recent show, that would be fun Well.

0:15:21.600 --> 0:15:23.760
<v Speaker 1>The difference between the A's and the Angels is the

0:15:24.040 --> 0:15:26.360
<v Speaker 1>A's have minor leaguers in their system that are.

0:15:26.240 --> 0:15:30.120
<v Speaker 3>Worth actually like Butler, Lewis I think is Lewis Butler

0:15:30.200 --> 0:15:30.880
<v Speaker 3>right through outfielder.

0:15:31.280 --> 0:15:33.520
<v Speaker 2>He's la Lawrence Lawrence, Lawrence Butler.

0:15:33.680 --> 0:15:35.520
<v Speaker 3>He said after that two home run game last week

0:15:35.560 --> 0:15:38.240
<v Speaker 3>that hey, we might not be, you know, great record

0:15:38.280 --> 0:15:40.000
<v Speaker 3>wise right now, but we're young, and we're talented. We're

0:15:40.000 --> 0:15:41.800
<v Speaker 3>gonna be pretty good and starting next year.

0:15:41.920 --> 0:15:44.520
<v Speaker 1>Like fun Well, I mean, his buddy Denzel Clark is

0:15:44.560 --> 0:15:46.120
<v Speaker 1>still in the city. I mean, they've they've got quite

0:15:46.120 --> 0:15:48.040
<v Speaker 1>a few guys that are still kind of looming around

0:15:48.080 --> 0:15:51.720
<v Speaker 1>in that system. So you know, it's nothing to like

0:15:51.840 --> 0:15:55.400
<v Speaker 1>that team is not good, but they're working through with

0:15:55.520 --> 0:15:57.800
<v Speaker 1>some pieces that you know they're gonna get their s.

0:15:57.920 --> 0:15:59.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Tyler soteris from his back up, he looks

0:15:59.440 --> 0:16:02.000
<v Speaker 1>pretty good. Glof has worked out a couple other on

0:16:02.120 --> 0:16:04.920
<v Speaker 1>the big note pieces. Pablo Lopez struck out a career

0:16:05.040 --> 0:16:09.800
<v Speaker 1>best fourteen batters, went eight scoreless in the against the

0:16:09.880 --> 0:16:12.800
<v Speaker 1>Mets on Sunday, and Pablo just continues to pop off.

0:16:13.160 --> 0:16:16.200
<v Speaker 1>Cole Reagans everybody loves Cole Reagans only went five and

0:16:16.280 --> 0:16:18.800
<v Speaker 1>two thirds and he lost the strike zone. I think

0:16:18.840 --> 0:16:23.120
<v Speaker 1>he had three, yeah, three straight insanely crazy pass balls,

0:16:23.320 --> 0:16:26.200
<v Speaker 1>gave up two earned runs, could not complete the inning.

0:16:26.560 --> 0:16:30.480
<v Speaker 1>He ended up having six though still the performance still

0:16:30.560 --> 0:16:35.480
<v Speaker 1>had sixteen swing and whiffs. The distribution is wild. I

0:16:35.560 --> 0:16:38.200
<v Speaker 1>mean he had multiple whiffs on every single pitch he

0:16:38.240 --> 0:16:40.960
<v Speaker 1>through double digit percentage of the time. His csw was

0:16:40.960 --> 0:16:43.720
<v Speaker 1>pretty low, twenty six percent lower than it had been,

0:16:43.840 --> 0:16:46.720
<v Speaker 1>but his fastball still up up a mile and a

0:16:46.760 --> 0:16:49.320
<v Speaker 1>half on the season average, which is still a little

0:16:49.360 --> 0:16:51.960
<v Speaker 1>bit janked from like the beginning of the year. But

0:16:52.240 --> 0:16:53.920
<v Speaker 1>up a mile and a half. The cutter was up

0:16:54.000 --> 0:16:57.000
<v Speaker 1>over a mile per hour. This was a little bit

0:16:57.040 --> 0:17:00.960
<v Speaker 1>more reality, I suppose for people. But Cole reagans after

0:17:01.080 --> 0:17:04.600
<v Speaker 1>that performance, is there any trepidation moving forward on that?

0:17:05.320 --> 0:17:05.760
<v Speaker 2>Not for now?

0:17:05.840 --> 0:17:07.639
<v Speaker 3>He went full Ricky and kill for a second there,

0:17:07.720 --> 0:17:10.280
<v Speaker 3>which was scary. But I think I think we're good

0:17:10.280 --> 0:17:11.680
<v Speaker 3>for now. I'm gonna keep all of them out there.

0:17:11.840 --> 0:17:14.480
<v Speaker 3>These will be as toughest matchups. His early schedule is nice.

0:17:14.520 --> 0:17:16.000
<v Speaker 3>Now he's got you know, the Jay's, He's going to

0:17:16.080 --> 0:17:18.360
<v Speaker 3>think the Rangers coming up here, and a few others,

0:17:18.440 --> 0:17:19.600
<v Speaker 3>so we'll see what he's really made of.

0:17:20.160 --> 0:17:22.880
<v Speaker 1>I love the yips. I feel like movies. I think

0:17:23.040 --> 0:17:25.400
<v Speaker 1>Major League made me love the yips when you see

0:17:25.400 --> 0:17:27.159
<v Speaker 1>a player have it, because like especially when they can

0:17:27.240 --> 0:17:29.200
<v Speaker 1>get through it. But I like multiple weeks of not

0:17:29.359 --> 0:17:31.040
<v Speaker 1>like one moment of yips.

0:17:31.200 --> 0:17:33.240
<v Speaker 3>You won't like the chuck knoblock or you can't throw

0:17:33.280 --> 0:17:35.000
<v Speaker 3>the second base for like over a month.

0:17:35.440 --> 0:17:36.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, that's exactly right.

0:17:37.800 --> 0:17:39.679
<v Speaker 3>Are you talking about brew from the catcher from Major

0:17:39.760 --> 0:17:42.640
<v Speaker 3>League two has to Replayboy to uh throw the second base?

0:17:42.800 --> 0:17:44.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? Yeah, exactly, That's what I'm saying. Like a real,

0:17:45.040 --> 0:17:47.960
<v Speaker 1>like something is wrong and stuck like that. That makes

0:17:48.040 --> 0:17:51.440
<v Speaker 1>me happy. I think it's just like making them people again,

0:17:51.760 --> 0:17:54.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, not just these superhuman idols that are put

0:17:54.840 --> 0:17:57.560
<v Speaker 1>up top. Lastly in the big news, Mason Miller is

0:17:57.640 --> 0:18:00.119
<v Speaker 1>going to be returning to the A's starting rotation a

0:18:00.200 --> 0:18:04.399
<v Speaker 1>day here on Monday. But how many innings pitched is

0:18:04.480 --> 0:18:07.800
<v Speaker 1>really the key. I think they said capped around fifty,

0:18:08.000 --> 0:18:11.040
<v Speaker 1>So I guess the question is, like, are you comfortable

0:18:11.160 --> 0:18:14.480
<v Speaker 1>at all with Mason Miller? Not?

0:18:15.359 --> 0:18:15.840
<v Speaker 2>It depends.

0:18:15.840 --> 0:18:18.320
<v Speaker 3>I guess I'm gonna say it's a team dependent here

0:18:18.600 --> 0:18:21.000
<v Speaker 3>because it's gonna be fifty ish pitches, it's gonna be

0:18:21.040 --> 0:18:22.840
<v Speaker 3>a few innings. He should get you a good amount

0:18:22.840 --> 0:18:25.680
<v Speaker 3>of strikeouts in that short sample size and ratios on

0:18:25.760 --> 0:18:29.159
<v Speaker 3>paper shouldn't be horrible once he gets destroyed. But like,

0:18:29.240 --> 0:18:30.920
<v Speaker 3>he's not gonna get your wins obviously, if you're a

0:18:30.960 --> 0:18:33.480
<v Speaker 3>quality start league, it's not happening. So it's one hundred

0:18:33.520 --> 0:18:35.400
<v Speaker 3>percent team dependent. Do you want just like a bulk

0:18:35.440 --> 0:18:37.639
<v Speaker 3>reliever or do you need wins and everything? And that's

0:18:37.680 --> 0:18:39.120
<v Speaker 3>where I wouldn't be in them obviously.

0:18:39.480 --> 0:18:42.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean it's not a great matchup and you're

0:18:42.880 --> 0:18:45.920
<v Speaker 1>not gonna get a win most likely, and you're looking

0:18:46.080 --> 0:18:47.400
<v Speaker 1>probably at chasing ratios.

0:18:47.520 --> 0:18:49.639
<v Speaker 2>So it's pretty much yet strikeouts and ratios and crossing

0:18:49.680 --> 0:18:50.119
<v Speaker 2>your fingers.

0:18:50.440 --> 0:18:53.000
<v Speaker 1>I just don't, are you well, you're really chasing like strikeouts,

0:18:53.040 --> 0:18:54.960
<v Speaker 1>so like, I just don't know. I don't think this

0:18:55.160 --> 0:18:56.920
<v Speaker 1>is the juice is not worth this, squeen.

0:18:57.800 --> 0:18:59.760
<v Speaker 3>I've been saying forever give me Ryan Armber all day

0:18:59.760 --> 0:19:01.800
<v Speaker 3>long because he just picks up wins and say he's

0:19:01.800 --> 0:19:04.280
<v Speaker 3>put that bulk middle game stuff for the Dodgers.

0:19:04.640 --> 0:19:07.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, all right, listener questions, I'm also going to be

0:19:07.520 --> 0:19:10.119
<v Speaker 1>giving you here in just a second the hint for

0:19:10.320 --> 0:19:13.280
<v Speaker 1>where in the world are Welsh and Corb and Carrol.

0:19:13.320 --> 0:19:15.480
<v Speaker 1>There is a hint today We did go somewhere, so

0:19:15.600 --> 0:19:18.359
<v Speaker 1>the hint is coming up here in just a moment.

0:19:18.960 --> 0:19:21.159
<v Speaker 1>Let's go through some listener questions our First off, I

0:19:21.160 --> 0:19:23.720
<v Speaker 1>want to just shout out Ca Salazard that said great job, Welsh,

0:19:23.760 --> 0:19:25.760
<v Speaker 1>I see you and hear you all over shows hard

0:19:25.800 --> 0:19:28.440
<v Speaker 1>worker and wealth and knowledge. Thank you very much. Hat

0:19:28.520 --> 0:19:31.320
<v Speaker 1>tipped to me and a nice thing. So it was

0:19:31.400 --> 0:19:34.280
<v Speaker 1>a long Sunday. So someone's saying something nice is like

0:19:34.680 --> 0:19:36.800
<v Speaker 1>abnormally great. So I just wanted to thank you for that.

0:19:37.320 --> 0:19:42.480
<v Speaker 1>Whips says, start Vlad Junior versus Texas Boston or Gorman,

0:19:42.640 --> 0:19:46.560
<v Speaker 1>who's got Baltimore in Philly this week? OBP League.

0:19:46.960 --> 0:19:49.040
<v Speaker 3>That's a good one because Gorman has swinging it really

0:19:49.119 --> 0:19:52.560
<v Speaker 3>well right now. I gotta Gorman with those matchups? Will

0:19:52.600 --> 0:19:54.400
<v Speaker 3>Gorman on those? That's interesting?

0:19:54.680 --> 0:19:56.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and let me look here too. I happen to

0:19:56.640 --> 0:19:59.680
<v Speaker 1>actually also have the hitter matchup over on Fantasy pros,

0:19:59.680 --> 0:20:03.120
<v Speaker 1>which is nice tool. The Saint Louis Cardinals, they play

0:20:03.359 --> 0:20:08.719
<v Speaker 1>six games this week, one lefty. Toronto plays seven games,

0:20:09.280 --> 0:20:12.560
<v Speaker 1>five righty's two lefty, so there's one extra game for

0:20:12.720 --> 0:20:16.040
<v Speaker 1>Vlad on the docket with one lefty game against Gorman.

0:20:16.080 --> 0:20:19.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna go Vlad because of this, but I wouldn't

0:20:19.000 --> 0:20:21.000
<v Speaker 1>blame you for Gorman. Gorman's just not like an OVP

0:20:21.119 --> 0:20:23.800
<v Speaker 1>gu either, and he has had a really hot bat.

0:20:23.880 --> 0:20:28.159
<v Speaker 1>But the one extra game I'm gonna side on with Vlad.

0:20:28.280 --> 0:20:30.879
<v Speaker 1>But like Bubba said, this is pretty damn close.

0:20:31.840 --> 0:20:33.000
<v Speaker 2>All right. How about this?

0:20:33.200 --> 0:20:35.360
<v Speaker 1>Mike says, start Alex Cobb versus Cleveland.

0:20:35.359 --> 0:20:37.080
<v Speaker 2>Bubba, it's an interesting one.

0:20:37.119 --> 0:20:38.920
<v Speaker 3>Cob At to start pushed backs that he's been dealing

0:20:38.960 --> 0:20:41.880
<v Speaker 3>with a hip and pingement since June, which makes sense

0:20:41.880 --> 0:20:43.560
<v Speaker 3>if you look at his struggles in July and August,

0:20:43.640 --> 0:20:46.280
<v Speaker 3>worst months of his season. I'd still pitch him since

0:20:46.359 --> 0:20:49.800
<v Speaker 3>the Guardians, but just know it's gonna be a weird

0:20:49.880 --> 0:20:50.800
<v Speaker 3>finish for Cobb.

0:20:51.280 --> 0:20:56.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I am starting him today, so I'm going for it.

0:20:56.200 --> 0:21:01.360
<v Speaker 1>But it is dangerous CJ drop Gella for Pete Crow.

0:21:01.840 --> 0:21:03.560
<v Speaker 1>I have I'm looking right now because I had not

0:21:03.640 --> 0:21:08.680
<v Speaker 1>paid attention to what Geloff recently has done. Yeah, okay,

0:21:08.800 --> 0:21:13.040
<v Speaker 1>well he's slowed down, except in five of his last

0:21:13.119 --> 0:21:16.280
<v Speaker 1>seven games he has multi hits. He has two or

0:21:16.359 --> 0:21:19.399
<v Speaker 1>more hits in five of his last seven games. In here,

0:21:19.800 --> 0:21:22.240
<v Speaker 1>the counting stats have kind of depleted. In those same

0:21:22.920 --> 0:21:26.520
<v Speaker 1>seven games, he has one stolen base, one homer. It

0:21:26.640 --> 0:21:30.800
<v Speaker 1>looks like five runs and only two RBIs, so the

0:21:30.880 --> 0:21:34.720
<v Speaker 1>counting stats have gone down. If I'm chasing stolen bases,

0:21:35.240 --> 0:21:37.960
<v Speaker 1>this is a probably easy drop for Pete Crow Armstrong.

0:21:38.080 --> 0:21:41.080
<v Speaker 1>I think Geloff has been playing pretty well. I don't

0:21:41.119 --> 0:21:43.399
<v Speaker 1>know it's it's I guess it's kind of a toss up,

0:21:43.480 --> 0:21:45.960
<v Speaker 1>Like if this is a util thing and position doesn't matter,

0:21:46.119 --> 0:21:48.240
<v Speaker 1>maybe I go with the upside of Pete Crow.

0:21:48.520 --> 0:21:53.480
<v Speaker 3>But I lean to say no, Yeah, I think I've

0:21:53.480 --> 0:21:55.520
<v Speaker 3>been a team gell Off. Everyone knows that, so I'd

0:21:55.560 --> 0:21:57.600
<v Speaker 3>stick with him. But yeah, I get it. If you

0:21:57.680 --> 0:22:01.160
<v Speaker 3>want to try if something new and see what Crow does.

0:22:01.280 --> 0:22:02.159
<v Speaker 3>We know what Gelff has.

0:22:03.000 --> 0:22:04.719
<v Speaker 1>Have you got commitment issues and you're trying to get

0:22:04.760 --> 0:22:05.680
<v Speaker 1>out there and see people?

0:22:05.880 --> 0:22:06.560
<v Speaker 2>Just swipe right.

0:22:08.240 --> 0:22:10.880
<v Speaker 1>Keep okay, Bill says, keep Trout as a five round

0:22:10.960 --> 0:22:13.360
<v Speaker 1>keeper or throw them back and have a round five

0:22:13.600 --> 0:22:16.560
<v Speaker 1>pick in a ten team Rod, I'd.

0:22:16.440 --> 0:22:19.600
<v Speaker 2>Keep him, that's deep. I think I would keep him too. Yes,

0:22:19.920 --> 0:22:20.320
<v Speaker 2>it's fine.

0:22:20.359 --> 0:22:23.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean ten team. Yeah, like you could throw

0:22:23.119 --> 0:22:25.480
<v Speaker 1>him back and yeah you get an extra pickback, but like,

0:22:25.840 --> 0:22:29.240
<v Speaker 1>is he going to be the fortieth on draft list

0:22:29.320 --> 0:22:33.560
<v Speaker 1>next year? I keep him here? Okay. Whips already had

0:22:33.600 --> 0:22:37.440
<v Speaker 1>the Vlad question. Donnie had just said miss Princess Welsh,

0:22:37.480 --> 0:22:39.879
<v Speaker 1>Princess Welsh might come back right towards the end of

0:22:39.920 --> 0:22:42.080
<v Speaker 1>the season, just letting everybody know we might do that.

0:22:42.480 --> 0:22:45.399
<v Speaker 1>Oh boy, Whip said, are we worried about C? J.

0:22:45.520 --> 0:22:48.200
<v Speaker 1>Abrams in a weekly league with his Nie soreness lineups

0:22:48.240 --> 0:22:50.840
<v Speaker 1>locked well in fifteen minutes? That was he has five

0:22:50.880 --> 0:22:51.680
<v Speaker 1>minutes stante to this.

0:22:53.320 --> 0:22:55.479
<v Speaker 3>No, I'm not worried about it either of his day

0:22:55.520 --> 0:22:57.119
<v Speaker 3>to day I think for the whole week you'll get

0:22:57.200 --> 0:22:57.840
<v Speaker 3>enough out of CJ.

0:22:58.240 --> 0:23:02.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Tim, Tim Robinson worried about it, and then eighty

0:23:02.760 --> 0:23:06.400
<v Speaker 1>said just drop mikel Garcia for Pete Crow. Yeah, yeah,

0:23:06.400 --> 0:23:07.240
<v Speaker 1>I think you can do that.

0:23:07.320 --> 0:23:09.640
<v Speaker 2>One is a very very good move. Yes, exactly.

0:23:09.680 --> 0:23:12.520
<v Speaker 1>All right, good questions. Thank you guys as always. So

0:23:12.640 --> 0:23:15.560
<v Speaker 1>here is your hint today for where in the world

0:23:15.680 --> 0:23:17.840
<v Speaker 1>are Welsh and Corbin Carrol? And it is going to

0:23:17.960 --> 0:23:22.040
<v Speaker 1>be a numbers guess are you ready? It's a it's

0:23:22.160 --> 0:23:29.880
<v Speaker 1>numbers the number guests one three, one eight zero five.

0:23:31.359 --> 0:23:38.120
<v Speaker 1>I repeat one three to one eight zero five, maybe

0:23:38.160 --> 0:23:42.360
<v Speaker 1>even mixing up the pronunciation of the numbers one three,

0:23:42.400 --> 0:23:44.920
<v Speaker 1>one eight zero five. That is your guest for where

0:23:45.040 --> 0:23:47.040
<v Speaker 1>Corbyn and I are.

0:23:47.200 --> 0:23:48.439
<v Speaker 2>So I'm so lost right now.

0:23:49.200 --> 0:23:52.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm making it tough. Last week, what did I say?

0:23:52.040 --> 0:23:56.200
<v Speaker 1>I was like sky and everyone's like football the stadium,

0:23:56.440 --> 0:23:58.639
<v Speaker 1>So I'm trying to make it tough for here. So

0:23:58.800 --> 0:24:00.719
<v Speaker 1>that is your guest today, and I'll say it one

0:24:00.760 --> 0:24:03.879
<v Speaker 1>more time as we go. Injuries. John Means is going

0:24:03.920 --> 0:24:06.560
<v Speaker 1>to make his twenty twenty three season debut on Tuesday

0:24:06.600 --> 0:24:10.480
<v Speaker 1>against the Cardinals. Means had a three seven four ERA,

0:24:10.600 --> 0:24:13.320
<v Speaker 1>a one one five whip and twenty two to eight

0:24:13.480 --> 0:24:16.240
<v Speaker 1>strikeout to walk ratio across twenty one and two thirds

0:24:16.280 --> 0:24:19.880
<v Speaker 1>of an innings in six Minor league rehab starts. Here's

0:24:19.920 --> 0:24:23.520
<v Speaker 1>the only question that matters. Are you comfortable starting John

0:24:23.600 --> 0:24:25.320
<v Speaker 1>Means against the Cardinals on Tuesday?

0:24:26.000 --> 0:24:26.200
<v Speaker 2>Nope.

0:24:26.240 --> 0:24:27.600
<v Speaker 3>I want to see him pitch one game in the

0:24:27.640 --> 0:24:30.040
<v Speaker 3>BIGS before I get even the thought of playing him.

0:24:30.600 --> 0:24:34.280
<v Speaker 1>No chance I'm starting him coming off of injuried I

0:24:34.400 --> 0:24:37.879
<v Speaker 1>don't think so. Luis Ringifo's out for the season with

0:24:38.200 --> 0:24:41.920
<v Speaker 1>a bicep rupture, but bye, Andres Munnos is dealing with

0:24:42.080 --> 0:24:44.359
<v Speaker 1>left hip discomfort and he may miss an outing here

0:24:44.440 --> 0:24:46.679
<v Speaker 1>or there. I wonder if they go to I won

0:24:46.800 --> 0:24:51.280
<v Speaker 1>if pre Lander Barroa might be maybe a save opportunity

0:24:51.520 --> 0:24:52.360
<v Speaker 1>later this week.

0:24:52.560 --> 0:24:53.160
<v Speaker 2>That would be fun.

0:24:53.240 --> 0:24:55.320
<v Speaker 3>He's shown some good stuff they've kind of rotated around with.

0:24:55.400 --> 0:24:58.080
<v Speaker 3>Munos has been out, Brash has gotten some love, So

0:24:58.720 --> 0:25:00.360
<v Speaker 3>we'll kind of see how that one plays out for sure.

0:25:00.720 --> 0:25:04.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and then two others, Spencer Striders having his start

0:25:04.560 --> 0:25:06.840
<v Speaker 1>move to Wednesday as he's dealing with the flu. I

0:25:06.880 --> 0:25:08.560
<v Speaker 1>thought I even saw this might be a little bit

0:25:08.600 --> 0:25:11.720
<v Speaker 1>earlier that. I believe they're gonna call up Kyle Wright

0:25:11.840 --> 0:25:14.800
<v Speaker 1>today in part of the doubleheader, and then Clayton Kershaw

0:25:14.880 --> 0:25:16.879
<v Speaker 1>had his start move to Friday for a little bit

0:25:16.920 --> 0:25:19.200
<v Speaker 1>of extra rest. With all of the chaos the Dodgers

0:25:19.240 --> 0:25:21.480
<v Speaker 1>who are going with I believe today Gavin Stone is

0:25:21.520 --> 0:25:23.879
<v Speaker 1>being called up and I'm going to pick on that today.

0:25:23.920 --> 0:25:26.000
<v Speaker 2>We got good, good thing to pick on.

0:25:26.320 --> 0:25:29.040
<v Speaker 1>Going to pick on it a little bit. The three

0:25:29.119 --> 0:25:31.960
<v Speaker 1>up and three down. Marcus Simeon went four for five,

0:25:32.040 --> 0:25:34.480
<v Speaker 1>two homers, three runs, Just kind of going back to

0:25:34.560 --> 0:25:37.560
<v Speaker 1>that second base conversation we had a couple weeks ago. Awesome,

0:25:37.680 --> 0:25:39.280
<v Speaker 1>he's going to be at the top tier of that list.

0:25:39.600 --> 0:25:42.399
<v Speaker 1>Ranger Suarez went six and one third. Believe had a

0:25:43.359 --> 0:25:46.200
<v Speaker 1>was it a no hitter or perfect game going through

0:25:46.280 --> 0:25:48.600
<v Speaker 1>like six I think it was yeah, and then he

0:25:48.720 --> 0:25:50.359
<v Speaker 1>ended with ten strikeouts. I think he gave up a

0:25:50.400 --> 0:25:52.320
<v Speaker 1>couple in runs. And then I put this in here.

0:25:52.480 --> 0:25:56.480
<v Speaker 1>Five players stole two bases or more on Sunday. Kyle Tucker,

0:25:56.640 --> 0:25:59.479
<v Speaker 1>Chas McCormick, Bobby Wit, Jacob Young, and Nico Horner. All

0:25:59.520 --> 0:26:03.600
<v Speaker 1>had multi stolen bases as earlier last week we had

0:26:03.680 --> 0:26:06.639
<v Speaker 1>I think we hit I know this because Tops are

0:26:06.680 --> 0:26:10.000
<v Speaker 1>fanatics put out a card that we hit over three

0:26:10.160 --> 0:26:13.200
<v Speaker 1>thousand stolen bases in a season, which was the most ever.

0:26:13.720 --> 0:26:16.000
<v Speaker 1>And it was like, you know, beginning of September. So

0:26:16.119 --> 0:26:18.240
<v Speaker 1>no shock with the new rules and what it has done.

0:26:18.560 --> 0:26:20.800
<v Speaker 1>And look at that bunch of stolen bases on the

0:26:20.880 --> 0:26:24.200
<v Speaker 1>three down. Austin Hayes oh for four with four strikeouts,

0:26:24.240 --> 0:26:27.399
<v Speaker 1>Tim Hill couldn't get out of a single portion of

0:26:27.440 --> 0:26:30.680
<v Speaker 1>an inning, gave up five earned runs, and Trevor Williams

0:26:30.960 --> 0:26:35.520
<v Speaker 1>four to one third six earned runs, had four walks.

0:26:36.119 --> 0:26:38.960
<v Speaker 1>Those are some big downs. Where can we get back up?

0:26:39.040 --> 0:26:40.879
<v Speaker 1>We can get back up with price picks. That's right,

0:26:41.080 --> 0:26:44.480
<v Speaker 1>one hundred percent deposit match gets you one hundred bucks.

0:26:44.600 --> 0:26:47.160
<v Speaker 1>That's free money, free money to do some pick ems.

0:26:47.320 --> 0:26:49.200
<v Speaker 1>You can play all their fun contests. Use the promo

0:26:49.280 --> 0:26:52.000
<v Speaker 1>code leading off when you do so, so you can

0:26:52.080 --> 0:26:54.480
<v Speaker 1>get credited. And then they love us and they're like, hey,

0:26:54.520 --> 0:26:57.080
<v Speaker 1>look we're doing awesome work. Here do it today. Promo

0:26:57.160 --> 0:27:01.199
<v Speaker 1>code leading off, download it, Prize picks, Bubba, how are

0:27:01.200 --> 0:27:02.080
<v Speaker 1>you price picking today?

0:27:02.760 --> 0:27:04.840
<v Speaker 3>Give me James Outman over half a total base going

0:27:04.880 --> 0:27:07.480
<v Speaker 3>togainst the Villa of San Diego album's hitting four hundred

0:27:07.560 --> 0:27:09.440
<v Speaker 3>over the last seven games, so it's give me a

0:27:09.480 --> 0:27:10.040
<v Speaker 3>singular better.

0:27:10.119 --> 0:27:10.520
<v Speaker 2>We'll take that.

0:27:11.119 --> 0:27:13.040
<v Speaker 3>Saya, Suzuki and coors Field over one and a half

0:27:13.080 --> 0:27:15.359
<v Speaker 3>total basis, say is really having a nice month of

0:27:15.440 --> 0:27:17.960
<v Speaker 3>September right now, so I'll take that, and then David

0:27:18.000 --> 0:27:20.160
<v Speaker 3>Schneider p Forerver's left these but he's just hitting everything

0:27:20.240 --> 0:27:20.479
<v Speaker 3>right now.

0:27:20.520 --> 0:27:22.560
<v Speaker 2>So over one and a half hits, runs and RBIs

0:27:22.640 --> 0:27:23.640
<v Speaker 2>for Davis Schneider.

0:27:24.119 --> 0:27:27.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm going with a all score. I am scoring today,

0:27:27.600 --> 0:27:30.040
<v Speaker 1>and I've got three scores here. I've got Chris Bassett

0:27:30.200 --> 0:27:31.960
<v Speaker 1>fantasy score thirty and a half. You know, I will

0:27:32.000 --> 0:27:34.520
<v Speaker 1>tell you. I just realized I didn't look. Sometimes they

0:27:34.600 --> 0:27:40.320
<v Speaker 1>have the outs recorded. If I can get under six innings,

0:27:40.359 --> 0:27:43.080
<v Speaker 1>so seventeen point five, I would take that over this

0:27:43.720 --> 0:27:45.720
<v Speaker 1>because that is actually a bet that I like today.

0:27:46.119 --> 0:27:48.440
<v Speaker 1>But I'm going with fantasy score in this respect. Corby

0:27:48.480 --> 0:27:50.680
<v Speaker 1>and Carroll, I'm going seven and a half and then

0:27:50.960 --> 0:27:53.240
<v Speaker 1>you're done. Alvarez, I'm going with eight and a half,

0:27:53.280 --> 0:27:55.200
<v Speaker 1>even though Mason Miller's in there, don't expect him to

0:27:55.240 --> 0:28:00.280
<v Speaker 1>be long all fantasy scores for me on the betting side, Bubba,

0:28:00.440 --> 0:28:02.960
<v Speaker 1>I told you I'm mentioning Chris Bassett in here because

0:28:03.000 --> 0:28:05.160
<v Speaker 1>I just like Toronto today. I like how Chris Bassett's

0:28:05.160 --> 0:28:07.439
<v Speaker 1>been pitching as of late. So I'm taking the Toronto

0:28:07.640 --> 0:28:09.760
<v Speaker 1>money line straight up. It was minus one forty two

0:28:09.840 --> 0:28:12.359
<v Speaker 1>last night. It's probably one forty five. I know it's

0:28:12.480 --> 0:28:14.639
<v Speaker 1>juiced up. Maybe you can put it with something, or

0:28:14.720 --> 0:28:16.920
<v Speaker 1>you can just play it straight. I like the full

0:28:17.000 --> 0:28:20.120
<v Speaker 1>game Toronto money line. I'd probably even play the first five.

0:28:20.600 --> 0:28:24.960
<v Speaker 1>I like San Diego and the Dodgers first five over

0:28:25.119 --> 0:28:28.880
<v Speaker 1>total runs, which some different sites give you the options.

0:28:28.960 --> 0:28:30.840
<v Speaker 1>Four and a half is juiced. I took five and

0:28:30.880 --> 0:28:34.560
<v Speaker 1>a half. It's plus money. So San Diego and the Dodgers,

0:28:34.600 --> 0:28:38.040
<v Speaker 1>it's pedro Villa and Gavin Stone. Pedro Villa loves to

0:28:38.080 --> 0:28:40.280
<v Speaker 1>walk people. Gavin Stone loves to give up earned runs.

0:28:40.640 --> 0:28:42.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna go with over five and a half through

0:28:42.800 --> 0:28:45.360
<v Speaker 1>the first five on that, and then I really like

0:28:45.480 --> 0:28:49.400
<v Speaker 1>this one today. Tyler Glass now outs at seventeen and

0:28:49.480 --> 0:28:52.280
<v Speaker 1>a half. Maybe it's a trap, but he's done this

0:28:52.440 --> 0:28:56.000
<v Speaker 1>in like I think six of his last seven starts,

0:28:56.040 --> 0:28:58.280
<v Speaker 1>he's gone at least six innings. He's been on a

0:28:58.320 --> 0:29:02.440
<v Speaker 1>freaking roll. It wasn't crazy juice minus one five, So

0:29:02.560 --> 0:29:04.880
<v Speaker 1>I love that straight. But what I will tell you

0:29:05.320 --> 0:29:06.880
<v Speaker 1>is I wanted to have a little bit more fun.

0:29:07.280 --> 0:29:09.880
<v Speaker 1>I took Tyler glass Now out seventeen and a half

0:29:10.080 --> 0:29:13.680
<v Speaker 1>and Chris Bassett outs seventeen and a half. I put

0:29:13.720 --> 0:29:16.880
<v Speaker 1>them together. I got like plus one eighty something, and

0:29:16.960 --> 0:29:18.800
<v Speaker 1>it's essentially saying I need to get both of those

0:29:18.800 --> 0:29:21.200
<v Speaker 1>guys to go to the sixth. I love that one.

0:29:21.400 --> 0:29:22.840
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a lot of fun. So that's what

0:29:22.960 --> 0:29:25.360
<v Speaker 1>I placed today. Those are my best bets of the day. Bubba,

0:29:25.360 --> 0:29:25.960
<v Speaker 1>what do you got.

0:29:26.480 --> 0:29:28.600
<v Speaker 2>At Yankees first five at plus one? Ten?

0:29:28.680 --> 0:29:31.719
<v Speaker 3>At Schmidt versus Cutter Crawford, Schmit's been actually really good

0:29:31.720 --> 0:29:34.120
<v Speaker 3>at least limiting damage. I'm going to beat close around

0:29:34.160 --> 0:29:37.120
<v Speaker 3>first five. Give us and plus money. Saya Suzuki already

0:29:37.120 --> 0:29:39.000
<v Speaker 3>talking about in price picks obviously, with like the Cubs

0:29:39.040 --> 0:29:41.480
<v Speaker 3>and Coors against Freeland over two and a half hits,

0:29:41.560 --> 0:29:44.360
<v Speaker 3>runs and RBIs even money at plus one hundred and

0:29:44.400 --> 0:29:48.280
<v Speaker 3>then Brandon Neimo, I love the the the Mets going

0:29:48.360 --> 0:29:50.240
<v Speaker 3>up against you, it's either Davies or Nelson, depends on

0:29:50.280 --> 0:29:52.840
<v Speaker 3>where you look. I don't care either way. Nemo over

0:29:52.880 --> 0:29:54.560
<v Speaker 3>one and a half hits runs and RBIs at minus

0:29:54.600 --> 0:29:57.320
<v Speaker 3>one twenty. He's been leading off, been quite productive, so

0:29:57.400 --> 0:29:59.080
<v Speaker 3>I will keep running with that, all right?

0:29:59.160 --> 0:30:00.960
<v Speaker 1>The best bets? What are we got on dfs? How

0:30:01.040 --> 0:30:01.880
<v Speaker 1>are we making it work?

0:30:01.920 --> 0:30:02.120
<v Speaker 2>I had?

0:30:02.240 --> 0:30:05.600
<v Speaker 1>I was telling Bubba football wise, Bogman and I put

0:30:05.680 --> 0:30:07.640
<v Speaker 1>up a contest yesterday and the pen We're doing this

0:30:07.720 --> 0:30:10.720
<v Speaker 1>pentathlon with Derek van Riper at the Athletic for football,

0:30:10.800 --> 0:30:14.760
<v Speaker 1>and it's like all these different contests we murdered yesterday

0:30:14.800 --> 0:30:17.200
<v Speaker 1>and we kill I mean like we had a football

0:30:17.280 --> 0:30:20.080
<v Speaker 1>DFS that went bonkers and that kind of got my

0:30:20.160 --> 0:30:21.880
<v Speaker 1>juices back going. And maybe I need to play some

0:30:22.080 --> 0:30:24.920
<v Speaker 1>MLB dfs, you know, just just the exact right way

0:30:25.000 --> 0:30:27.520
<v Speaker 1>to lose some money. So Bubba, you you know, take

0:30:27.560 --> 0:30:29.080
<v Speaker 1>me to the Promised Land. What are we putting together?

0:30:29.200 --> 0:30:29.520
<v Speaker 2>My best?

0:30:29.560 --> 0:30:33.640
<v Speaker 3>It's an eleven game slate on Monday. Top pitchers Glass

0:30:33.680 --> 0:30:35.040
<v Speaker 3>now ten eight against Minnesota.

0:30:35.400 --> 0:30:35.960
<v Speaker 2>Like that a lot.

0:30:36.000 --> 0:30:37.680
<v Speaker 3>There's a bunch like Woodrift's pitch and he's in a

0:30:37.760 --> 0:30:40.640
<v Speaker 3>nice spot there versus the Marlins Lozardo's eight point five

0:30:40.640 --> 0:30:42.720
<v Speaker 3>a little bit savings versus Milwaukee. He's been back the

0:30:42.840 --> 0:30:44.520
<v Speaker 3>last few starts, so something to keep in mind there.

0:30:44.840 --> 0:30:46.600
<v Speaker 3>And if you need to punt, Clark Schmidt mentioned him

0:30:46.600 --> 0:30:48.920
<v Speaker 3>a second ago. He's only six point six k in

0:30:49.080 --> 0:30:52.240
<v Speaker 3>Boston Stax. He loved the Cubs versus Freeland. Of course,

0:30:52.680 --> 0:30:56.480
<v Speaker 3>Mets versus whatever Arizona picture we get to see, Dodgers

0:30:56.560 --> 0:30:58.080
<v Speaker 3>versus Villa is great. And then if you want to

0:30:58.080 --> 0:31:00.320
<v Speaker 3>be a little sneaki here and get some value, Kansas

0:31:00.320 --> 0:31:03.800
<v Speaker 3>City versus an Area over five dillan Cease is always nice.

0:31:04.560 --> 0:31:05.640
<v Speaker 2>And then value wise, I keep.

0:31:05.560 --> 0:31:08.000
<v Speaker 3>Playing Mark Fiantos because he's two point four k, very

0:31:08.040 --> 0:31:10.400
<v Speaker 3>very affordable, and Nelson Alaska's three point two k against

0:31:10.400 --> 0:31:13.880
<v Speaker 3>seats DJ Stewart of the Mets three point one Ca Davies.

0:31:14.280 --> 0:31:16.840
<v Speaker 3>And then you got to mention him now. Pete crow

0:31:16.960 --> 0:31:20.840
<v Speaker 3>Armstrong is the bare minimum two thousand dollars in cooers Field.

0:31:21.200 --> 0:31:23.880
<v Speaker 3>He should be rostered in almost every league as long

0:31:23.880 --> 0:31:25.320
<v Speaker 3>as he's in the lineup today. What you should do

0:31:26.360 --> 0:31:28.040
<v Speaker 3>a follow up? We have two follow up questions.

0:31:28.520 --> 0:31:30.280
<v Speaker 1>This is a good one. Would you drop Nolan Jones

0:31:30.320 --> 0:31:30.920
<v Speaker 1>for Pete Crow.

0:31:31.400 --> 0:31:33.280
<v Speaker 2>No, No, absolutely not.

0:31:33.560 --> 0:31:36.520
<v Speaker 1>It's like all home games. Nolan Jones has been a monster.

0:31:36.680 --> 0:31:38.680
<v Speaker 2>They fortune of the last twenty in courters do not

0:31:38.920 --> 0:31:39.160
<v Speaker 2>do that.

0:31:39.640 --> 0:31:41.880
<v Speaker 1>No, and I love and you know, also, let me

0:31:41.960 --> 0:31:46.240
<v Speaker 1>look at my handy dandy lineup thing here. Colorado faces

0:31:46.480 --> 0:31:50.120
<v Speaker 1>one lefty this week. They have seven games, six or

0:31:50.200 --> 0:31:53.840
<v Speaker 1>against righty's, and some are not home though as I'm

0:31:53.840 --> 0:31:56.080
<v Speaker 1>looking here, they do travel out. I think this is

0:31:56.160 --> 0:31:58.200
<v Speaker 1>the group that goes out. But they have the fifth

0:31:58.280 --> 0:32:02.120
<v Speaker 1>best hitter matchup rating according to Fantasy Pros. But also,

0:32:02.280 --> 0:32:04.480
<v Speaker 1>just no, Nolan Jones has been awesome. It's a great question,

0:32:05.080 --> 0:32:08.200
<v Speaker 1>but no. And then also Richard said, rank Lane Thomas

0:32:08.320 --> 0:32:10.920
<v Speaker 1>Gelloff or Carrie Carpenter as a keeper.

0:32:10.680 --> 0:32:14.000
<v Speaker 2>For next year. Oh, that's a good one. I like

0:32:14.600 --> 0:32:16.960
<v Speaker 2>gel Off Thomas Carpenter.

0:32:17.840 --> 0:32:23.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm gonna go with what'd you say, Gellof Thomas Carpenter.

0:32:24.640 --> 0:32:27.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna swap Carrie for Thomas.

0:32:27.440 --> 0:32:29.560
<v Speaker 2>He's going to be like to me, they're almost like

0:32:29.720 --> 0:32:30.400
<v Speaker 2>the same player.

0:32:30.520 --> 0:32:32.960
<v Speaker 1>And yeah, Jady Martinez or A B. A Bray who's

0:32:32.960 --> 0:32:35.680
<v Speaker 1>been pretty hot right now. J So I wouldn't go

0:32:35.760 --> 0:32:37.960
<v Speaker 1>with that all right, Where in the world we're Welsh,

0:32:38.080 --> 0:32:41.240
<v Speaker 1>and Corbin Carrol had a pretty tough one here. This

0:32:41.560 --> 0:32:44.880
<v Speaker 1>was a number cipher. If you are a good cipher,

0:32:45.040 --> 0:32:49.520
<v Speaker 1>which I don't know if many of you are, one three, one,

0:32:49.560 --> 0:32:52.920
<v Speaker 1>eight zero five, So just putting that out there, different

0:32:53.040 --> 0:32:57.120
<v Speaker 1>changing of numbers. So where are we? Well, let's find out.

0:33:06.800 --> 0:33:09.600
<v Speaker 1>Something I found out is a very good friend of

0:33:09.680 --> 0:33:14.080
<v Speaker 1>mine who writes on a good respected site is going

0:33:14.160 --> 0:33:16.520
<v Speaker 1>to be interviewing Corbyn Carroll. And he hit me up

0:33:16.560 --> 0:33:19.440
<v Speaker 1>about something with Corvin Carroll. And now I'm realizing, like,

0:33:20.000 --> 0:33:23.120
<v Speaker 1>I wish I could incept him to be like to

0:33:23.280 --> 0:33:25.880
<v Speaker 1>ask the question, would you like to comment on all

0:33:25.920 --> 0:33:27.760
<v Speaker 1>the places you've traveled with the Welsh?

0:33:27.840 --> 0:33:29.880
<v Speaker 2>And just see him being like, would be amazing.

0:33:29.920 --> 0:33:30.720
<v Speaker 3>What is this?

0:33:31.000 --> 0:33:33.440
<v Speaker 1>What is this at all? But I don't know if

0:33:33.440 --> 0:33:35.440
<v Speaker 1>I could ask that question, I might the person likes

0:33:35.480 --> 0:33:37.280
<v Speaker 1>to have some fun. But yeah, someone I know is

0:33:37.320 --> 0:33:39.200
<v Speaker 1>interviewing and I was talking with him about it. But

0:33:40.040 --> 0:33:42.560
<v Speaker 1>the bit moves on of Corbyn and I we look

0:33:42.640 --> 0:33:46.440
<v Speaker 1>so happy everywhere we go. The hint was a number

0:33:46.600 --> 0:33:52.480
<v Speaker 1>cipher one three, one, eight zero five. Bubba, do you

0:33:52.640 --> 0:33:53.760
<v Speaker 1>have any guesses?

0:33:54.040 --> 0:33:56.120
<v Speaker 2>I have no clue what this is. I am so

0:33:56.400 --> 0:33:57.800
<v Speaker 2>beyond lost right now, So this.

0:33:57.920 --> 0:33:59.880
<v Speaker 1>Is an intrut. When Sabo said, I'm gonna guess something

0:34:00.040 --> 0:34:03.520
<v Speaker 1>happened here, he says, well, he went a date perspective,

0:34:03.640 --> 0:34:06.880
<v Speaker 1>he said, January third, eighteen oh five was a boring day.

0:34:06.920 --> 0:34:07.440
<v Speaker 2>What was that?

0:34:07.840 --> 0:34:08.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm not a good hit.

0:34:08.560 --> 0:34:09.320
<v Speaker 2>Let's see, I don't know.

0:34:09.480 --> 0:34:11.040
<v Speaker 3>I'm trying to get I look at my phone and

0:34:11.120 --> 0:34:13.239
<v Speaker 3>like this the old text thing, or it's a number one.

0:34:13.320 --> 0:34:18.520
<v Speaker 1>Everybody did it? Everybody? Let's see, I don't that's let's

0:34:18.520 --> 0:34:20.640
<v Speaker 1>see Lewis and Clark. I'm not really sure. It looks

0:34:20.640 --> 0:34:22.200
<v Speaker 1>like there's a bunch of stuff that happened on there.

0:34:22.400 --> 0:34:25.080
<v Speaker 1>So someone went with a date, multiple said, people said

0:34:25.080 --> 0:34:27.040
<v Speaker 1>they googled. One person got.

0:34:26.920 --> 0:34:28.160
<v Speaker 2>It right, so they cheated.

0:34:28.320 --> 0:34:30.120
<v Speaker 1>So what you're saying, well, everyone, I think tried to

0:34:30.160 --> 0:34:31.960
<v Speaker 1>cheat on this one because it was a number cipher.

0:34:32.040 --> 0:34:34.120
<v Speaker 1>But you want to know what's very fascinating about it.

0:34:34.520 --> 0:34:37.480
<v Speaker 1>It was a cipher, but it wasn't a date. It

0:34:37.640 --> 0:34:44.960
<v Speaker 1>wasn't a coordination. No Corbyn Carroll this week stole five bases,

0:34:45.800 --> 0:34:50.040
<v Speaker 1>five bases from Friday to Sunday. That is thievery, and

0:34:50.200 --> 0:34:52.560
<v Speaker 1>we had to go to jail. That's right. We went

0:34:52.640 --> 0:34:55.680
<v Speaker 1>to jail. The thievery were behind bars because he was

0:34:55.719 --> 0:34:59.600
<v Speaker 1>a thief. Five stolen bases in two days actually, Friday

0:34:59.719 --> 0:35:03.160
<v Speaker 1>and Saturday. We were sent off. And what does that

0:35:03.840 --> 0:35:07.680
<v Speaker 1>uh that number cipher stand for one three dash one

0:35:07.840 --> 0:35:12.680
<v Speaker 1>eight zero five. That is the penal code for stealing. Theft,

0:35:13.120 --> 0:35:16.520
<v Speaker 1>that is theft. That is the police code for stealing.

0:35:17.480 --> 0:35:21.000
<v Speaker 1>We have a one three one eight zero five Diamondbacks

0:35:21.239 --> 0:35:22.239
<v Speaker 1>Corbyn Carl and some.

0:35:22.360 --> 0:35:23.239
<v Speaker 2>Big, tall, fat guy.

0:35:23.280 --> 0:35:25.880
<v Speaker 1>They're stealing a bunch of bases. We're gonna need backup.

0:35:26.200 --> 0:35:29.320
<v Speaker 1>And that's what ended up happening. And we spent we

0:35:29.400 --> 0:35:35.719
<v Speaker 1>spent the weekend in the clank. I say, I don't

0:35:35.760 --> 0:35:37.680
<v Speaker 1>know how it goes. I guess who got it right, Donnie.

0:35:37.880 --> 0:35:41.640
<v Speaker 1>Of course Donnie knew what the jail thing was. Donnie

0:35:41.680 --> 0:35:42.960
<v Speaker 1>might have spent a couple of months.

0:35:43.560 --> 0:35:46.279
<v Speaker 2>He's got that code in his back of his mind.

0:35:46.680 --> 0:35:50.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think Donnie might have known. I don't know

0:35:50.040 --> 0:35:52.640
<v Speaker 1>if Sean got this in under the buzzer. I don't

0:35:52.680 --> 0:35:55.120
<v Speaker 1>think he did. But Donnie nailed it. Donnie is probably

0:35:55.200 --> 0:35:58.280
<v Speaker 1>all too familiar with that code. So, uh, there you go, Donnie.

0:35:58.320 --> 0:36:01.040
<v Speaker 1>Good job. Everybody on that home calls. Let's end this

0:36:01.160 --> 0:36:04.239
<v Speaker 1>bad boy with the home run calls. Very sad news

0:36:04.320 --> 0:36:06.800
<v Speaker 1>to report. By the way, I've been kicked off the

0:36:06.840 --> 0:36:10.240
<v Speaker 1>home run board, so who really cares about this thing anymore?

0:36:10.680 --> 0:36:13.359
<v Speaker 1>Blue Harvester is in the lead at fifty six. Razor

0:36:13.440 --> 0:36:16.600
<v Speaker 1>Ramona has moved into second, with JJ Tator at fifty one.

0:36:16.680 --> 0:36:19.600
<v Speaker 1>Those guys are the closest to trying to pull this off.

0:36:19.680 --> 0:36:23.239
<v Speaker 1>With three weeks to go, Wonky moved up ridiculous. I

0:36:23.520 --> 0:36:25.840
<v Speaker 1>just got passed again. So now I'm not gonna be

0:36:26.000 --> 0:36:27.879
<v Speaker 1>the number one home unless I have a good week.

0:36:27.960 --> 0:36:30.160
<v Speaker 1>I need to be the number one homer Fantasy pros person.

0:36:30.239 --> 0:36:33.520
<v Speaker 1>That's currently Wonky down at forty three. So the gap

0:36:33.600 --> 0:36:36.399
<v Speaker 1>between the top ten is forty two to fifty six.

0:36:36.520 --> 0:36:42.320
<v Speaker 1>Blue Harvesters still with absolute domination all season long. So Bubba,

0:36:42.320 --> 0:36:43.800
<v Speaker 1>where are you going with your home run call today?

0:36:44.320 --> 0:36:46.239
<v Speaker 3>I'm sticking to cooors Field and let's stick with the guy.

0:36:46.239 --> 0:36:47.640
<v Speaker 3>I got all the prop bets I'll give me say

0:36:47.680 --> 0:36:50.600
<v Speaker 3>this is Zuki having some fun in coors.

0:36:50.760 --> 0:36:53.560
<v Speaker 1>I like that one. Who the hell did I even pick?

0:36:53.600 --> 0:36:55.360
<v Speaker 1>I completely forgot I got to scroll down here. My

0:36:55.440 --> 0:36:58.280
<v Speaker 1>home run call of the day is Oh, Fernando Tatist

0:36:58.360 --> 0:37:00.680
<v Speaker 1>Junior just went with it, even though you know, really

0:37:00.719 --> 0:37:02.440
<v Speaker 1>hasn't been I think he's got one homer in his

0:37:02.560 --> 0:37:05.560
<v Speaker 1>last like ten or fifteen games. But just this matchup,

0:37:05.680 --> 0:37:08.160
<v Speaker 1>this Dodgers Potters matchup, I think can get really messy.

0:37:08.239 --> 0:37:10.840
<v Speaker 1>Gavin Stone, we can see really good Gavin Stones, but

0:37:11.120 --> 0:37:13.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't expect that. I expect it's going to be

0:37:13.400 --> 0:37:14.719
<v Speaker 1>a Stone where we're going to want to pass and

0:37:14.760 --> 0:37:16.800
<v Speaker 1>Fernando Tatist Junior is going to push a couple of

0:37:16.840 --> 0:37:20.359
<v Speaker 1>those out. So that is my guest today. Schwarber would

0:37:20.360 --> 0:37:23.680
<v Speaker 1>have been a pretty good one as well. Schwarb's Schwarberfest

0:37:23.880 --> 0:37:26.719
<v Speaker 1>is locked in. So there you go, friends, That is it.

0:37:26.840 --> 0:37:28.960
<v Speaker 1>That is our preparation. Hopefully you guys had some fun.

0:37:29.040 --> 0:37:30.960
<v Speaker 1>We made you laugh, and we got you set for

0:37:31.040 --> 0:37:33.400
<v Speaker 1>your playoffs. There's a lot to it. We're gonna be

0:37:33.480 --> 0:37:35.879
<v Speaker 1>back on Wednesday and Friday. We're going to continue doing

0:37:35.920 --> 0:37:37.840
<v Speaker 1>that through the last season. I will say the countdown

0:37:37.880 --> 0:37:39.600
<v Speaker 1>is on, Bubba and I did this math last week.

0:37:40.360 --> 0:37:42.680
<v Speaker 1>After this, there's only five more shows. There's only five

0:37:42.760 --> 0:37:46.920
<v Speaker 1>more shows, so you know, come in love us. We're

0:37:46.960 --> 0:37:48.759
<v Speaker 1>going to be gone. Soon. We'll be back next year,

0:37:48.840 --> 0:37:50.480
<v Speaker 1>but you know we're gonna be gone soon, so we're

0:37:50.520 --> 0:37:53.400
<v Speaker 1>hoping that we can get you guys rolling through your playoffs.

0:37:53.719 --> 0:37:56.399
<v Speaker 1>Make sure you follow him at B d Intrick, follow

0:37:56.480 --> 0:37:59.560
<v Speaker 1>me at is It the Welsh? Ask us any questions otherwise,

0:37:59.600 --> 0:38:02.000
<v Speaker 1>we will see Wednesday right here on leading off on

0:38:02.120 --> 0:38:04.760
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Pros. Goodbye, my friends, peace

0:38:06.760 --> 0:38:08.040
<v Speaker 2>You at him good