WEBVTT - Win And You're In!

0:00:00.240 --> 0:00:03.920
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Fantasy Football Weekly, a production of iHeartRadio.

0:00:06.080 --> 0:00:11.080
<v Speaker 2>Time now for Fantasy Football Weekly from iHeartRadio, your weekly

0:00:11.160 --> 0:00:15.800
<v Speaker 2>source for the nation's best fantasy speculation and advice. Now

0:00:16.079 --> 0:00:20.000
<v Speaker 2>along with the guys from Guillotine Leagues dot com. Here's

0:00:20.040 --> 0:00:21.840
<v Speaker 2>your host, Paul Chargian.

0:00:23.840 --> 0:00:26.960
<v Speaker 3>Welcome to a win and your in edition of Fantasy

0:00:26.960 --> 0:00:30.240
<v Speaker 3>Football Weekly. I am Paul Charchian. Co hosts today are

0:00:30.600 --> 0:00:32.800
<v Speaker 3>Scott Fish and Brian Johnson.

0:00:32.880 --> 0:00:35.120
<v Speaker 4>Hello, guys, what's going on? Charts?

0:00:35.240 --> 0:00:35.800
<v Speaker 5>What's up? Chart?

0:00:35.880 --> 0:00:37.680
<v Speaker 6>You sound like you're in the most fun place on

0:00:37.760 --> 0:00:38.560
<v Speaker 6>Earth right now.

0:00:38.680 --> 0:00:40.560
<v Speaker 3>I am in Las Vegas as a matter of fact,

0:00:40.720 --> 0:00:43.520
<v Speaker 3>so kind of yeah, it is the most fun place

0:00:43.560 --> 0:00:46.600
<v Speaker 3>on Earth. Vikings take on Raiders. I'm here for that

0:00:46.720 --> 0:00:49.080
<v Speaker 3>game and a few other odds and ends. And you

0:00:49.080 --> 0:00:52.159
<v Speaker 3>guys are back in the studio. And that means, Scottfish,

0:00:52.280 --> 0:00:55.120
<v Speaker 3>you get to be drunk with button bar power.

0:00:55.400 --> 0:00:57.520
<v Speaker 4>Well I have half of that at least.

0:01:00.160 --> 0:01:03.080
<v Speaker 6>No, No, we are drinking now that we do whatever

0:01:03.120 --> 0:01:06.520
<v Speaker 6>we want. Well, while the cat's away.

0:01:05.000 --> 0:01:07.440
<v Speaker 7>The charge, I want to know what the odds and

0:01:07.600 --> 0:01:10.000
<v Speaker 7>eads are if you're in Vegas.

0:01:10.560 --> 0:01:13.680
<v Speaker 3>Oh yeah, baby, I don't doubt it. Now, do you

0:01:13.760 --> 0:01:15.760
<v Speaker 3>want to give the button bar test drive. Do you

0:01:15.840 --> 0:01:17.240
<v Speaker 3>or do you feel like you've got it mastered and

0:01:17.280 --> 0:01:19.000
<v Speaker 3>you'll be ready to just jump in whenever you need

0:01:19.040 --> 0:01:19.320
<v Speaker 3>to touch.

0:01:19.640 --> 0:01:21.319
<v Speaker 4>Let's try it, let me, let me go with our

0:01:21.319 --> 0:01:22.800
<v Speaker 4>classic nine.

0:01:22.640 --> 0:01:26.560
<v Speaker 3>Times nine time. I think you got it figured out well?

0:01:26.880 --> 0:01:27.520
<v Speaker 4>I feel so well.

0:01:28.760 --> 0:01:31.880
<v Speaker 3>Yes, I mentioned it's winning your in week. It's the

0:01:31.880 --> 0:01:33.959
<v Speaker 3>week before the playoffs, so for a lot of you,

0:01:33.959 --> 0:01:36.959
<v Speaker 3>you have to have this win. We're here to help.

0:01:37.000 --> 0:01:39.160
<v Speaker 3>We'll break down all the games Fantasy Football Weekly style

0:01:39.200 --> 0:01:41.720
<v Speaker 3>with letter grades on every player who matters. Plus take

0:01:41.760 --> 0:01:44.440
<v Speaker 3>a chance on me nine players that you can unearth.

0:01:44.480 --> 0:01:47.760
<v Speaker 3>Maybe you've been rocking Sam Howel for a long time

0:01:47.800 --> 0:01:50.680
<v Speaker 3>and you need a replacement quarterback. We're here to help.

0:01:50.760 --> 0:01:54.560
<v Speaker 3>Three tough questions later on in the show. Yeah, nicely done,

0:01:54.920 --> 0:01:56.960
<v Speaker 3>because that's gonna be my only chance to uh to

0:01:57.000 --> 0:01:58.120
<v Speaker 3>mention Sam Howel today.

0:01:58.240 --> 0:02:00.440
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I dropped a half a howl half.

0:02:00.480 --> 0:02:03.800
<v Speaker 3>We'll take a half how and we'll answer three tough

0:02:03.840 --> 0:02:06.480
<v Speaker 3>questions later on in the show. Only one team on

0:02:06.600 --> 0:02:08.640
<v Speaker 3>by so it means we've got a lot of games

0:02:08.680 --> 0:02:12.200
<v Speaker 3>to break down, and we begin with Carolina taking on

0:02:12.440 --> 0:02:16.120
<v Speaker 3>New Orleans Scott not a lot to like in Carolina,

0:02:16.200 --> 0:02:19.400
<v Speaker 3>even the usually reliable Adam Thielen has dried up of late.

0:02:19.800 --> 0:02:22.960
<v Speaker 3>Do you have many, if any starting grades for Panthers here?

0:02:23.160 --> 0:02:23.400
<v Speaker 4>Yeah?

0:02:23.480 --> 0:02:25.760
<v Speaker 7>Can I be honest, I don't have many starting grades

0:02:25.760 --> 0:02:28.520
<v Speaker 7>in this matchup at all. I mean, we got Bryce

0:02:28.600 --> 0:02:31.680
<v Speaker 7>Young top, but he's facing a top twelve pass defense.

0:02:32.520 --> 0:02:34.880
<v Speaker 7>Bryce hasn't top two hundred yards since we gave He's

0:02:34.919 --> 0:02:37.080
<v Speaker 7>only got one multi score game. I do have him

0:02:37.120 --> 0:02:40.040
<v Speaker 7>on the bench against the Saints here, others in the

0:02:40.080 --> 0:02:43.720
<v Speaker 7>past game Adam Feelen and Jonathan Mingo. I have him

0:02:43.800 --> 0:02:47.440
<v Speaker 7>on the bench, but I'm gonna note quickly Saints are

0:02:47.560 --> 0:02:50.560
<v Speaker 7>second best against the perimeter, but they're ninth worst against

0:02:50.639 --> 0:02:54.000
<v Speaker 7>the slot, and we two thelan had himself.

0:02:53.680 --> 0:02:54.640
<v Speaker 4>A day against them.

0:02:55.000 --> 0:02:57.720
<v Speaker 7>So it's a good spot if you're really in desperation

0:02:57.919 --> 0:03:01.880
<v Speaker 7>dart mode, dart throw mode. But I do have him

0:03:01.919 --> 0:03:04.280
<v Speaker 7>on the bench because what we saw last week is

0:03:04.360 --> 0:03:07.640
<v Speaker 7>the coaching staff didn't really feed him. Me I believe

0:03:07.680 --> 0:03:09.320
<v Speaker 7>three targets. I think he had caught all three of

0:03:09.360 --> 0:03:12.520
<v Speaker 7>those targets. But Jonathan Mingo also kind of in that

0:03:12.600 --> 0:03:15.040
<v Speaker 7>dart throw ring range. I have him on the bench.

0:03:15.440 --> 0:03:16.560
<v Speaker 4>He kind of broke.

0:03:16.320 --> 0:03:19.520
<v Speaker 7>Out last week the coaching staff threw ten targets at him.

0:03:19.760 --> 0:03:23.320
<v Speaker 7>That new coaching staff after Frank Reich was fired. He

0:03:23.400 --> 0:03:25.359
<v Speaker 7>was almost my take a chance on my me player

0:03:25.440 --> 0:03:28.119
<v Speaker 7>last week because the good matchup. But in this one

0:03:28.160 --> 0:03:31.880
<v Speaker 7>he's gonna get Paulson Adebu, who's been great with Latimore

0:03:31.960 --> 0:03:35.320
<v Speaker 7>on IR. The nice things about Mingo he's on the

0:03:35.320 --> 0:03:37.680
<v Speaker 7>field ninety five percent of the time. It's just a really,

0:03:37.720 --> 0:03:41.040
<v Speaker 7>really tough matchup. Again, you have to be desperate, so

0:03:41.200 --> 0:03:44.480
<v Speaker 7>I do have him on the bench. Dart throw desperate Chubb.

0:03:45.200 --> 0:03:47.520
<v Speaker 7>You know what I forgot this, This is where we

0:03:47.600 --> 0:03:50.200
<v Speaker 7>need to charge. There's the dearth throw, Darth throw for

0:03:50.280 --> 0:03:50.960
<v Speaker 7>Jonathan Mingo.

0:03:51.760 --> 0:03:52.520
<v Speaker 4>Chewba Hubbard.

0:03:52.600 --> 0:03:55.400
<v Speaker 7>I'm giving a B grade two once again with the

0:03:55.400 --> 0:03:57.760
<v Speaker 7>coaching staff. We saw what they wanted to do last

0:03:57.760 --> 0:04:02.200
<v Speaker 7>week very clearly. He gave Chewba Hubbard twenty five carries

0:04:03.120 --> 0:04:06.000
<v Speaker 7>only through to running backs four times, two or twice,

0:04:06.120 --> 0:04:10.000
<v Speaker 7>and both were to Miles Sanders. Cuba and Miles combined

0:04:10.000 --> 0:04:11.640
<v Speaker 7>for one hundred and seven in a week two in

0:04:11.720 --> 0:04:14.880
<v Speaker 7>this matchup. But a lot has changed since then. Five

0:04:14.920 --> 0:04:17.520
<v Speaker 7>of six lead backs against the Saints over the last

0:04:17.760 --> 0:04:21.719
<v Speaker 7>six weeks have scored, including three straight. The one who

0:04:21.760 --> 0:04:25.240
<v Speaker 7>didn't totaled ninety seven yards. So it's been an OK

0:04:25.520 --> 0:04:28.240
<v Speaker 7>matchup for the lead back. The Saints still give up

0:04:28.240 --> 0:04:31.520
<v Speaker 7>match in the pass game twenty two point eight yards

0:04:31.520 --> 0:04:34.880
<v Speaker 7>per game at pass game to running backs, but similar

0:04:35.080 --> 0:04:38.640
<v Speaker 7>volume backs. What Cuba was doing last week, what he's done,

0:04:38.720 --> 0:04:42.680
<v Speaker 7>you know, the twenty ish touch running backs eighty three yards,

0:04:42.760 --> 0:04:45.800
<v Speaker 7>ninety yards, ninety one yards, ninety five yards. I wouldn't

0:04:45.800 --> 0:04:48.799
<v Speaker 7>be surprised if he gets eighty two one hundred yards

0:04:49.160 --> 0:04:51.880
<v Speaker 7>likelihood of scoring because that's what New Orleans has been

0:04:51.920 --> 0:04:54.600
<v Speaker 7>allowing recently. So I got a B grade on Chewba Hubbard.

0:04:54.960 --> 0:04:58.000
<v Speaker 7>On the other side, I got nothing in the pass game.

0:04:58.400 --> 0:05:00.880
<v Speaker 7>I don't even care if it's car or Winston going.

0:05:00.920 --> 0:05:03.880
<v Speaker 7>The Panthers are allowing one hundred and ninety one passing

0:05:03.960 --> 0:05:07.760
<v Speaker 7>yards per game. That's just nothing. Teams are just running

0:05:07.800 --> 0:05:09.400
<v Speaker 7>on him. They they're just.

0:05:09.480 --> 0:05:13.280
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I'll just say quote unquote allowing there. They're allowing

0:05:13.279 --> 0:05:14.680
<v Speaker 6>that much because no one throws on them.

0:05:14.839 --> 0:05:17.480
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, I was gonna find the love hurts because this

0:05:17.600 --> 0:05:23.120
<v Speaker 7>is really an everybody runs situation against Carolina. I hope

0:05:23.120 --> 0:05:26.680
<v Speaker 7>you like my singing there so I know Kamara can

0:05:26.720 --> 0:05:29.080
<v Speaker 7>be an extension through the pass game, but I don't

0:05:29.080 --> 0:05:31.440
<v Speaker 7>think he's gonna do enough forget to get stats for

0:05:31.480 --> 0:05:34.159
<v Speaker 7>the quarterback here, Chris a Lave is the only wide

0:05:34.200 --> 0:05:39.200
<v Speaker 7>receiver I'm considering starting only receiving option. Honestly, Taysom Hill's

0:05:39.240 --> 0:05:42.440
<v Speaker 7>been missing practice all week. Rashi Ya Heat is still

0:05:42.440 --> 0:05:45.440
<v Speaker 7>in protocol. Chris Alave has been out with an illness

0:05:45.440 --> 0:05:49.680
<v Speaker 7>but is expected to play. It's a tough match matchup.

0:05:50.640 --> 0:05:53.440
<v Speaker 7>Winston targeted a Lave forty percent of the time once

0:05:53.520 --> 0:05:55.840
<v Speaker 7>car went down, and Carr was already targeting him like

0:05:56.000 --> 0:05:59.240
<v Speaker 7>twenty five to thirty percent of the time. One one

0:05:59.320 --> 0:06:01.720
<v Speaker 7>fun stat here I got for Chris a Lave. He's

0:06:01.760 --> 0:06:05.760
<v Speaker 7>averaging over two PPR points per target, not per catch,

0:06:06.080 --> 0:06:09.599
<v Speaker 7>per target over the last four They're just hyper targeting

0:06:09.720 --> 0:06:13.440
<v Speaker 7>him and he's getting fantasy points on those targets. The Panthers,

0:06:13.720 --> 0:06:17.039
<v Speaker 7>despite holding the pass game down, are bottom eight on

0:06:17.240 --> 0:06:20.359
<v Speaker 7>deep ball pass rate allowed, which Chris a Lave or

0:06:20.400 --> 0:06:23.280
<v Speaker 7>Shahida if he does go. But Chris Alave definitely can

0:06:23.320 --> 0:06:27.120
<v Speaker 7>make Hay with I do have a not very confident

0:06:27.320 --> 0:06:29.320
<v Speaker 7>a grade on him on the assumption he's going to

0:06:29.360 --> 0:06:33.440
<v Speaker 7>get ten plus touches. There are ten plus targets. Alvin Kamara,

0:06:33.520 --> 0:06:35.640
<v Speaker 7>I do have an A grade on because everyone runs

0:06:35.640 --> 0:06:38.120
<v Speaker 7>on Carolina. We've talked about it a couple of times.

0:06:38.360 --> 0:06:42.760
<v Speaker 7>He's averaging twelve PPR points just on pass game work.

0:06:43.160 --> 0:06:45.560
<v Speaker 7>If he hasn't been very explosive or very efficient in

0:06:45.600 --> 0:06:47.800
<v Speaker 7>the run game, but this is the matchup for him.

0:06:49.720 --> 0:06:54.160
<v Speaker 7>Sim Yeah, carolinea allows the fifth highest yards per carry,

0:06:54.200 --> 0:06:57.000
<v Speaker 7>fourth highest rushing yards, and the most rushing scores.

0:06:57.040 --> 0:06:58.839
<v Speaker 4>A grade on Alvin Kamara.

0:07:00.080 --> 0:07:02.200
<v Speaker 3>You know, Carolina, you're talking about the good pass defense.

0:07:02.240 --> 0:07:04.240
<v Speaker 3>They got J. C. Horn back and he is a

0:07:04.440 --> 0:07:07.720
<v Speaker 3>terrific cornerback, so I think it's a pretty legitimate good

0:07:07.880 --> 0:07:10.680
<v Speaker 3>good pass defense. Yeah, Brian, let's head over to you.

0:07:10.760 --> 0:07:13.680
<v Speaker 3>Seattle takes on San Francisco. Gino Smith coming off a

0:07:14.200 --> 0:07:17.640
<v Speaker 3>dramatically better game than I expected last week against Dallas,

0:07:17.840 --> 0:07:20.320
<v Speaker 3>but right back into the grinder in a tough matchup

0:07:20.360 --> 0:07:21.440
<v Speaker 3>at San Francisco.

0:07:21.760 --> 0:07:24.720
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, tough matchup, and he's also dealing with the groin injury,

0:07:24.840 --> 0:07:28.200
<v Speaker 6>still listed officially as questionable to play. And I do

0:07:28.280 --> 0:07:30.880
<v Speaker 6>want to mention real quick Seattle and San Francisco just

0:07:31.000 --> 0:07:34.080
<v Speaker 6>met in Week twelve. The forty nine Ers rolled the

0:07:34.120 --> 0:07:37.360
<v Speaker 6>Seahawks thirty one to thirteen in that game, so starting

0:07:37.400 --> 0:07:40.160
<v Speaker 6>with Gino, he only had one hundred and eighty scoreless

0:07:40.200 --> 0:07:43.120
<v Speaker 6>passing yards in that first meeting against the forty nine Ers,

0:07:43.160 --> 0:07:46.040
<v Speaker 6>who are ranked third and pass coverage by Pro Football Focus.

0:07:46.280 --> 0:07:50.040
<v Speaker 6>San Francisco has surrendered just twelve passing touchdowns all season.

0:07:50.080 --> 0:07:53.560
<v Speaker 6>That's the second fewest with fifteen interceptions, the most in

0:07:53.600 --> 0:07:56.520
<v Speaker 6>the league. So Gino on the bench for me even

0:07:56.560 --> 0:08:00.000
<v Speaker 6>if he plays, And for his receivers dk Metcalf, Jack

0:08:00.160 --> 0:08:02.000
<v Speaker 6>Smith and Jig but Tyler Lockett, I have a C

0:08:02.240 --> 0:08:04.920
<v Speaker 6>on all of them. These three combined for just eight

0:08:04.960 --> 0:08:07.240
<v Speaker 6>catches and one hundred and three scoreless yards in that

0:08:07.320 --> 0:08:11.160
<v Speaker 6>first meeting meeting, meaning they all should have been benched. Really,

0:08:11.160 --> 0:08:13.240
<v Speaker 6>but odds are at least one producers here. The forty

0:08:13.320 --> 0:08:16.360
<v Speaker 6>nine Ers have yielded the third most targets to wide

0:08:16.400 --> 0:08:20.520
<v Speaker 6>receivers and the fourth most red zone targets, so game

0:08:20.560 --> 0:08:22.960
<v Speaker 6>script should favor the passing game, even if you know

0:08:23.000 --> 0:08:25.000
<v Speaker 6>it sits. But I will give this put so I'll

0:08:25.040 --> 0:08:27.320
<v Speaker 6>put a C on all three wide receivers, and I

0:08:27.360 --> 0:08:31.960
<v Speaker 6>have a C on Kenneth Walker and Zach Sharbonay, who

0:08:32.040 --> 0:08:35.120
<v Speaker 6>are both expected to play. Walker will be returning from

0:08:35.120 --> 0:08:38.000
<v Speaker 6>an oblique injury. Sharbon Nay is dealing with a knee injury.

0:08:38.640 --> 0:08:40.760
<v Speaker 6>As a bad matchup, though, you know what, I'm changing

0:08:40.760 --> 0:08:42.440
<v Speaker 6>my mind. If they both play, they're both on the bench.

0:08:42.480 --> 0:08:45.600
<v Speaker 6>It's a brutal matchup. If one sits, I will start

0:08:45.640 --> 0:08:47.959
<v Speaker 6>the other. But if both are, if both are active,

0:08:48.000 --> 0:08:48.840
<v Speaker 6>they're both on the bench.

0:08:48.880 --> 0:08:49.120
<v Speaker 5>For me.

0:08:49.600 --> 0:08:52.360
<v Speaker 6>Over to the San Francisco side, Christian McCaffrey is certainly

0:08:52.360 --> 0:08:54.600
<v Speaker 6>not on the bench. Easy A for him not getting

0:08:54.600 --> 0:08:57.960
<v Speaker 6>into that. Brandon Ayuk gonna give him a B. The

0:08:58.000 --> 0:09:00.480
<v Speaker 6>game script did not favor the forty nine ers game

0:09:00.480 --> 0:09:03.040
<v Speaker 6>when these teams first met. It was a CMC ground game.

0:09:03.360 --> 0:09:06.800
<v Speaker 6>But Ayuk did catch two passes for fifty yards and

0:09:06.840 --> 0:09:10.000
<v Speaker 6>a touchdown, and the Seahawks are allowing a healthy fourteen

0:09:10.040 --> 0:09:12.719
<v Speaker 6>catches one hundred and sixty yards and one touchdown per

0:09:12.760 --> 0:09:16.280
<v Speaker 6>game to opposing wide out. So B for Ayuk. Also

0:09:16.280 --> 0:09:18.600
<v Speaker 6>at B for Deebo Samuel. He had a good game

0:09:18.640 --> 0:09:21.679
<v Speaker 6>in that first meeting, seven catches for seventy nine yards.

0:09:21.920 --> 0:09:24.680
<v Speaker 6>He added fifteen rushing yards with a rushing score in

0:09:24.720 --> 0:09:27.960
<v Speaker 6>that game, So a B for Samuel just to see.

0:09:28.000 --> 0:09:30.720
<v Speaker 6>For George Kittle, though, he was quiet in the first

0:09:30.760 --> 0:09:34.200
<v Speaker 6>meeting three catches for nineteen scoreless yards, and he didn't

0:09:34.200 --> 0:09:36.760
<v Speaker 6>do much against Seattle in the playoffs last year either,

0:09:37.160 --> 0:09:41.240
<v Speaker 6>two catches for thirty seven scoreless yards. The Seahawks have

0:09:41.280 --> 0:09:44.400
<v Speaker 6>surrendered just two tight end touchdowns, but they are allowing

0:09:44.440 --> 0:09:47.160
<v Speaker 6>more than five catches and fifty yards per game to

0:09:47.200 --> 0:09:50.120
<v Speaker 6>the position. That's decent production. So the sea for Kittle,

0:09:50.320 --> 0:09:53.160
<v Speaker 6>and lastly, just a be on brock party modest two

0:09:53.240 --> 0:09:55.520
<v Speaker 6>hundred and nine passing yards, had one touchdown in the

0:09:55.559 --> 0:09:58.720
<v Speaker 6>first meeting. Again, it was a CMC ground game. Hopefully

0:09:58.760 --> 0:10:01.560
<v Speaker 6>Seattle keeps it a little cliar. Dak Prescott has had

0:10:01.559 --> 0:10:03.760
<v Speaker 6>a monster game against Seattle last week. You're not sitting

0:10:04.200 --> 0:10:07.600
<v Speaker 6>Rockberdy basically, so be on him, you know.

0:10:07.679 --> 0:10:10.400
<v Speaker 3>I'll note that although George Kittle did have a quiet

0:10:10.440 --> 0:10:13.640
<v Speaker 3>game when these teams met earlier this year, last year

0:10:13.760 --> 0:10:18.320
<v Speaker 3>in the two meetings, four touchdowns for George Kittle in

0:10:18.360 --> 0:10:19.080
<v Speaker 3>these matchups.

0:10:19.120 --> 0:10:21.360
<v Speaker 6>So yes, in the regular season, he was quiet in

0:10:21.400 --> 0:10:24.640
<v Speaker 6>the playoffs, but uh yeah, Kittle is a Spike week player.

0:10:24.640 --> 0:10:25.080
<v Speaker 5>You never know.

0:10:25.200 --> 0:10:27.120
<v Speaker 6>I don't think he has a super high ceiling, but

0:10:27.160 --> 0:10:28.640
<v Speaker 6>you're not gonna sit him obviously.

0:10:29.160 --> 0:10:31.719
<v Speaker 3>All right, let's talk about Detroit taking on Chicago. These

0:10:31.720 --> 0:10:34.720
<v Speaker 3>teams also just met a couple of weeks ago. Let's

0:10:34.720 --> 0:10:36.680
<v Speaker 3>start with the passing game. I'm on Ross Saint Brown

0:10:36.800 --> 0:10:39.520
<v Speaker 3>and obvious a here. He had an eight catch seventy

0:10:39.559 --> 0:10:41.679
<v Speaker 3>seven yard game with a touchdown when they met three

0:10:41.720 --> 0:10:46.040
<v Speaker 3>weeks ago. He runs from the slot, refaces competent but

0:10:46.080 --> 0:10:50.280
<v Speaker 3>not special cornerback Kyler Gordon. Chicago allows the fifth shortest

0:10:50.320 --> 0:10:52.920
<v Speaker 3>average pass and that's kind of I'm on Ross Saint

0:10:52.960 --> 0:10:56.360
<v Speaker 3>Brown's game anyway, is those quick passes and then yards

0:10:56.400 --> 0:10:58.959
<v Speaker 3>after the catch. So nothing here to deter you from

0:10:58.960 --> 0:11:01.240
<v Speaker 3>starting I'm on Ross sat round like you normally would.

0:11:01.760 --> 0:11:05.320
<v Speaker 3>Sam Laporta posted season lows against the Bears in the

0:11:05.360 --> 0:11:07.960
<v Speaker 3>first matchup, but the Bears have allowed the tenth most

0:11:08.000 --> 0:11:10.000
<v Speaker 3>points to tight ends this season, kind of middle of

0:11:10.000 --> 0:11:12.400
<v Speaker 3>the pack. They've allowed five touchdowns on the season to

0:11:12.480 --> 0:11:15.439
<v Speaker 3>tight ends, including one to TJ. Howkinson last week. Come

0:11:15.480 --> 0:11:17.560
<v Speaker 3>in with a B grade on la Porta. We think

0:11:18.360 --> 0:11:20.720
<v Speaker 3>in totality is probably a lot better than what he

0:11:20.720 --> 0:11:23.439
<v Speaker 3>showed against the Bears last time, and all the other

0:11:23.600 --> 0:11:25.920
<v Speaker 3>Detroit wide receivers are on the bench. They cannibalize each

0:11:25.960 --> 0:11:28.840
<v Speaker 3>other and it's a tricky matchup. Over the past five weeks,

0:11:28.920 --> 0:11:32.240
<v Speaker 3>Chicago allowing the third fewest yards per game to opposing

0:11:32.240 --> 0:11:35.520
<v Speaker 3>wide receivers, in no small part because the emergence of

0:11:35.559 --> 0:11:40.400
<v Speaker 3>elite cornerback Jalen Johnson just suffocating opponents. To this point,

0:11:41.440 --> 0:11:45.160
<v Speaker 3>he's giving up two receptions for ten yards in his

0:11:45.320 --> 0:11:50.440
<v Speaker 3>coverage over the last five weeks. It is nuts. Yeah,

0:11:50.480 --> 0:11:52.800
<v Speaker 3>so everybody else on the bench, let's go to the runners.

0:11:53.040 --> 0:11:55.640
<v Speaker 3>There's some reason for caution here. Well, actually, while we're

0:11:55.640 --> 0:11:57.800
<v Speaker 3>doing the receiving game, let me go to Jared Goff,

0:11:57.800 --> 0:12:00.120
<v Speaker 3>who comes in with a B grade. In Chicago's pass

0:12:00.200 --> 0:12:04.640
<v Speaker 3>defense dramatically improved, as I mentioned. Fortunately, the individual matchups

0:12:04.640 --> 0:12:06.760
<v Speaker 3>for I'm on, Russaint Brown and Sam Laporte, I think

0:12:06.800 --> 0:12:10.280
<v Speaker 3>are good enough that GoF remains fairly stable here. Chicago

0:12:10.360 --> 0:12:12.720
<v Speaker 3>has allowed multiple touchdown passes in three of the past

0:12:12.760 --> 0:12:14.640
<v Speaker 3>five and I think Goff is in that one to

0:12:14.679 --> 0:12:17.640
<v Speaker 3>two range for touchdowns, hopefully on the two sides. So

0:12:17.760 --> 0:12:20.960
<v Speaker 3>given him the B grade. For David Montgomery Jamiir Gibbs,

0:12:21.000 --> 0:12:22.559
<v Speaker 3>this is a tricky matchup.

0:12:23.120 --> 0:12:23.400
<v Speaker 5>Now.

0:12:24.400 --> 0:12:27.920
<v Speaker 3>Bears run defense has been good really all year, but

0:12:28.000 --> 0:12:31.280
<v Speaker 3>even better lately. They all the fifth fewest rushing yards

0:12:31.280 --> 0:12:34.280
<v Speaker 3>per game, the second fewest yards per attempt. They rank

0:12:34.440 --> 0:12:38.680
<v Speaker 3>number two in ESPN's run stuff win rate. No back

0:12:38.760 --> 0:12:42.360
<v Speaker 3>is top seventy six yards against Chicago all season. And

0:12:42.360 --> 0:12:45.319
<v Speaker 3>then the Bears only give up sixty four rushing yards

0:12:45.360 --> 0:12:48.160
<v Speaker 3>per game. And if Gibbs and Montgomery have to split

0:12:48.559 --> 0:12:54.720
<v Speaker 3>sixty four rushing yards, that's not great good No, Now,

0:12:54.960 --> 0:12:58.400
<v Speaker 3>the good side for more Gibbs than Montgomery is that

0:12:58.600 --> 0:13:01.720
<v Speaker 3>the Bears do give up the third most targets in

0:13:01.760 --> 0:13:04.280
<v Speaker 3>the third most reception, so I think that helps Gibbs,

0:13:05.320 --> 0:13:07.440
<v Speaker 3>and he did put up six catches for fifty nine

0:13:07.520 --> 0:13:10.640
<v Speaker 3>yards when these teams met a few weeks ago. The

0:13:10.880 --> 0:13:15.760
<v Speaker 3>other side that I think Brian will appreciate revenge game

0:13:16.120 --> 0:13:21.959
<v Speaker 3>for David Montgomery in Chicago. So there's that angle c

0:13:22.240 --> 0:13:26.120
<v Speaker 3>grades for both Montgomery and Gibbs in a very difficult matchup.

0:13:26.360 --> 0:13:29.200
<v Speaker 6>It was a buzzer beater touchdown, game winning touchdown for

0:13:29.280 --> 0:13:31.640
<v Speaker 6>David Montgomery, I believe in the first meeting as well.

0:13:32.080 --> 0:13:34.679
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think you're right about that. Actually, so that's science.

0:13:35.160 --> 0:13:37.520
<v Speaker 3>Let's go to Let's go to the let's go to

0:13:37.559 --> 0:13:39.559
<v Speaker 3>the bear side of this. This is a lot shorter.

0:13:39.920 --> 0:13:42.080
<v Speaker 3>All the Chicago Runners are on the bench because it's

0:13:42.080 --> 0:13:46.760
<v Speaker 3>a three way cluster boinc between Herbert Johnson and Foreman.

0:13:47.320 --> 0:13:51.400
<v Speaker 3>And Detroit's a good run defense. Nobody's top. Nobody topped

0:13:51.400 --> 0:13:55.080
<v Speaker 3>thirty five rushing yards in the previous meeting between these teams,

0:13:55.080 --> 0:13:57.800
<v Speaker 3>and the Lions rank number two in rushing yards allowed

0:13:57.800 --> 0:13:59.600
<v Speaker 3>at just sixty one per game. And if you got

0:13:59.640 --> 0:14:03.520
<v Speaker 3>to split sixty one yards three ways, gross, if I

0:14:03.520 --> 0:14:04.959
<v Speaker 3>had to pick one and be Foreman, who I think

0:14:04.960 --> 0:14:07.040
<v Speaker 3>is the most likely to get goal line carries. But

0:14:07.080 --> 0:14:09.920
<v Speaker 3>I'm keeping them all on the bench. In the passing game,

0:14:09.960 --> 0:14:12.240
<v Speaker 3>you only care about Justin Fields and Dj Moore, let's

0:14:12.240 --> 0:14:15.320
<v Speaker 3>start with Justin Fields. He ran for one hundred and

0:14:15.440 --> 0:14:18.600
<v Speaker 3>four yards in the meeting a few weeks ago. Detroit's

0:14:18.600 --> 0:14:21.520
<v Speaker 3>only faced one other mobile quarterback. That was Lamar Jackson,

0:14:21.560 --> 0:14:24.400
<v Speaker 3>who also ran for a touchdown in his game. Lions

0:14:24.400 --> 0:14:27.720
<v Speaker 3>are ranked twenty sixth and pass coverage by Pro Football Focus.

0:14:27.720 --> 0:14:30.840
<v Speaker 3>They've given up at least three passing touchdowns in three

0:14:30.920 --> 0:14:34.360
<v Speaker 3>their last six games, so Fields has got some passing upside.

0:14:34.400 --> 0:14:38.040
<v Speaker 3>He's got rushing upside in this one. A grade for

0:14:38.360 --> 0:14:40.640
<v Speaker 3>justin fields. Let's hope they keep running him man.

0:14:40.720 --> 0:14:42.520
<v Speaker 7>And then DJ call from a couple of weeks ago,

0:14:42.600 --> 0:14:44.320
<v Speaker 7>a bunch of A grades for fields.

0:14:44.680 --> 0:14:49.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, DJ Moore, huge game on Thanksgiving? Was I think

0:14:49.120 --> 0:14:51.080
<v Speaker 3>it was a Thanksgiving that these teams met. I think

0:14:51.080 --> 0:14:51.520
<v Speaker 3>it was.

0:14:53.360 --> 0:14:53.600
<v Speaker 5>There.

0:14:53.640 --> 0:14:56.040
<v Speaker 3>We go nicely done? All right? On top of things,

0:14:56.400 --> 0:14:59.040
<v Speaker 3>over the last five weeks, Detroit has allowed the fifth

0:14:59.080 --> 0:15:02.120
<v Speaker 3>most yards and the most touchdowns per game to opposing

0:15:02.160 --> 0:15:05.320
<v Speaker 3>wide receivers, and they allow the fourth highest a dot

0:15:05.400 --> 0:15:09.280
<v Speaker 3>at nine yards and the deep balls DJ Moore specialty,

0:15:09.360 --> 0:15:10.680
<v Speaker 3>So we like teams that are gonna give up the

0:15:10.720 --> 0:15:13.000
<v Speaker 3>deep ball. He runs from the outside. That means we'll

0:15:13.000 --> 0:15:16.240
<v Speaker 3>see a lot of cornerback Jerry Jacobs, who over the

0:15:16.320 --> 0:15:19.840
<v Speaker 3>last five weeks, get this is allowing a passer rating

0:15:19.880 --> 0:15:23.480
<v Speaker 3>of one hundred and fifty three. Fifty eight is perfect.

0:15:23.480 --> 0:15:24.280
<v Speaker 4>It's almost perfect.

0:15:24.320 --> 0:15:30.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, So Jerry Jacobs almost perfect in futility over over

0:15:30.840 --> 0:15:35.640
<v Speaker 3>the past five weeks, DJ Moore A grade. All right,

0:15:35.760 --> 0:15:37.600
<v Speaker 3>with that, let's take a break. When we come back,

0:15:37.800 --> 0:15:40.080
<v Speaker 3>take a chance on me. Nine players you'll want to

0:15:40.440 --> 0:15:43.160
<v Speaker 3>consider starting that you normally would not. Maybe you've got

0:15:43.200 --> 0:15:45.520
<v Speaker 3>a problem at the running back position because you were

0:15:45.560 --> 0:15:48.480
<v Speaker 3>counting on Isaiah Pacheco. Maybe you were a Sam Howell

0:15:48.520 --> 0:15:51.480
<v Speaker 3>owner and you need a replacement quarterback. We're here to

0:15:51.560 --> 0:15:54.960
<v Speaker 3>help you with some waiver wire level players that you

0:15:55.000 --> 0:15:57.440
<v Speaker 3>can start this week when we come back to Fantasy

0:15:57.480 --> 0:16:34.800
<v Speaker 3>Football Weekly. Take a chance on me, nine players not

0:16:34.840 --> 0:16:38.200
<v Speaker 3>normally new starting lineup. We begin at the quarterback position,

0:16:38.520 --> 0:16:40.040
<v Speaker 3>Scott Fish, Who you got?

0:16:40.440 --> 0:16:43.600
<v Speaker 7>I am going with Jordan Love averaging nearly thirty eight

0:16:43.720 --> 0:16:46.360
<v Speaker 7>dropbacks per game. He's passing a lot fourth in air

0:16:46.480 --> 0:16:49.120
<v Speaker 7>yards and has a nine point one eight dott. He's

0:16:49.160 --> 0:16:51.960
<v Speaker 7>really driving the ball his butt down the field, coming

0:16:51.960 --> 0:16:54.280
<v Speaker 7>off four multi score games in a row, and gets

0:16:54.280 --> 0:16:57.480
<v Speaker 7>a Giants team that yes held down Jones and Zappi

0:16:57.680 --> 0:17:00.400
<v Speaker 7>last week and or two in Week twelve a New England.

0:17:00.400 --> 0:17:04.560
<v Speaker 7>But before that got the Giants got violated by Sam

0:17:04.600 --> 0:17:08.400
<v Speaker 7>Howell and Dak Presidot. Even Cooper Rush did some work

0:17:08.400 --> 0:17:11.520
<v Speaker 7>in relief of Dak. Those two total seven hundred and

0:17:11.520 --> 0:17:15.680
<v Speaker 7>eighty four yards and six scores between them. Yeah, Jordan Love,

0:17:15.840 --> 0:17:16.680
<v Speaker 7>I take a chance on me.

0:17:16.760 --> 0:17:19.600
<v Speaker 3>Flair all right, Brian, your take a Janson me quarterback.

0:17:19.880 --> 0:17:24.040
<v Speaker 6>I've got Cleveland's, Yes, Cleveland's Joe Flacco at home against

0:17:24.080 --> 0:17:26.920
<v Speaker 6>the Jaguars. Now the Browns are saying their game day

0:17:27.000 --> 0:17:29.200
<v Speaker 6>quarterback is going to be a game day decision between

0:17:29.240 --> 0:17:32.440
<v Speaker 6>Flacco and Dorian Thompson Brown. But it's Thompson Robinson. I'm sorry,

0:17:32.440 --> 0:17:34.880
<v Speaker 6>but it's going to be Joe Flacco in my mind.

0:17:34.880 --> 0:17:36.880
<v Speaker 6>But even if it's DTR, I would I would start

0:17:36.960 --> 0:17:40.119
<v Speaker 6>him against Jacksonville, who have allowed multiple passing touchdowns in

0:17:40.160 --> 0:17:42.879
<v Speaker 6>three of their last four games, and six of the

0:17:42.960 --> 0:17:45.800
<v Speaker 6>last eight quarterbacks Jacksonville has faced have thrown for at

0:17:45.880 --> 0:17:49.720
<v Speaker 6>least three hundred yards. Jacksonville could also be without starting

0:17:49.760 --> 0:17:54.440
<v Speaker 6>quarterback Tyson Campbell and free safety free safety Andre Cisco

0:17:54.800 --> 0:17:57.520
<v Speaker 6>of no relation to Cisco of the thong song. But

0:17:57.720 --> 0:18:00.479
<v Speaker 6>I love whoever starts a quarterback for the But it's

0:18:00.480 --> 0:18:01.320
<v Speaker 6>going to be Jill Blacklell.

0:18:03.640 --> 0:18:06.520
<v Speaker 3>I'm going with Russell Wilson against the Chargers. Chargers ranked

0:18:06.520 --> 0:18:09.000
<v Speaker 3>dead last and pass defense as they have really all season,

0:18:09.040 --> 0:18:13.600
<v Speaker 3>and if you remove games against backup passers, opposing starting

0:18:13.680 --> 0:18:19.040
<v Speaker 3>quarterbacks against the Chargers averaging three hundred and thirty seven

0:18:19.160 --> 0:18:22.000
<v Speaker 3>yards and two and a half touchdown passes. It's a

0:18:22.000 --> 0:18:24.520
<v Speaker 3>great opportunity for Wilson here. The catch with Russ is

0:18:24.560 --> 0:18:27.879
<v Speaker 3>always volume. He throws the third fewest passes, just twenty

0:18:27.960 --> 0:18:31.439
<v Speaker 3>nine per game, which generally caps his upside. But the

0:18:31.560 --> 0:18:34.840
<v Speaker 3>Chargers see the fourth most passes thirty seven per game.

0:18:34.880 --> 0:18:36.840
<v Speaker 3>So if Uss is going to be closer to thirty seven,

0:18:36.880 --> 0:18:39.679
<v Speaker 3>he feels even that much safer here. He's thrown just

0:18:39.720 --> 0:18:43.080
<v Speaker 3>one touchdown in three straight games against solid defenses, but

0:18:43.119 --> 0:18:46.400
<v Speaker 3>he's augmented his fantasy score with rushing touchdowns at back

0:18:46.400 --> 0:18:49.280
<v Speaker 3>to back games, and he's actually top twenty rushing yards

0:18:49.280 --> 0:18:51.560
<v Speaker 3>in seven of the last eight games. So there, you know,

0:18:52.440 --> 0:18:54.200
<v Speaker 3>he's got a little bit of the old Russell Wilson

0:18:54.200 --> 0:18:56.800
<v Speaker 3>wheels going right now, which I like as well. Russell

0:18:56.800 --> 0:18:58.919
<v Speaker 3>Wilson might take a chance at me quarterback, So go

0:18:58.920 --> 0:19:01.000
<v Speaker 3>to the running back position, Scott, who you got?

0:19:01.720 --> 0:19:05.960
<v Speaker 7>We are going with Chase Brown of the Cincinnati Bengals.

0:19:06.600 --> 0:19:08.960
<v Speaker 7>Just last week, we saw the Bengals give Brown the

0:19:09.000 --> 0:19:10.160
<v Speaker 7>ball nine times.

0:19:10.359 --> 0:19:10.960
<v Speaker 5>Nine times.

0:19:11.000 --> 0:19:13.480
<v Speaker 4>Look at that nine bought it and.

0:19:13.480 --> 0:19:15.760
<v Speaker 7>Two of them went for huge gains. On Monday night,

0:19:15.960 --> 0:19:18.679
<v Speaker 7>the Colts allowed the third most running back touches, so

0:19:18.720 --> 0:19:21.160
<v Speaker 7>there should be enough to go around this. Colt Steel

0:19:21.160 --> 0:19:23.840
<v Speaker 7>allowing the fourth most fantasy points to running backs, including

0:19:24.000 --> 0:19:28.320
<v Speaker 7>second most rushing touchdowns. By the way the secondary running back.

0:19:28.320 --> 0:19:30.879
<v Speaker 7>The second running back had eighty eight yards last week,

0:19:31.240 --> 0:19:34.080
<v Speaker 7>and two weeks ago had eighty eight yards. So maybe

0:19:34.160 --> 0:19:36.439
<v Speaker 7>eighty eight yards here for Chase Brown.

0:19:38.080 --> 0:19:40.560
<v Speaker 3>We would take that for sure, Brian, you take a

0:19:40.640 --> 0:19:41.600
<v Speaker 3>chance at your running back.

0:19:41.880 --> 0:19:44.320
<v Speaker 6>I'm sticking with the Browns and I'm going with Kareem

0:19:44.400 --> 0:19:47.879
<v Speaker 6>Hunt again at home against the Jaguars. Jerome Ford is

0:19:47.920 --> 0:19:52.159
<v Speaker 6>technically the starter, but Hunt still getting significant touches, especially

0:19:52.200 --> 0:19:54.600
<v Speaker 6>in the red zone, where he and Ford have both

0:19:54.760 --> 0:19:59.160
<v Speaker 6>seen nine opportunities since week nine nine and since week

0:19:59.240 --> 0:20:02.680
<v Speaker 6>eight Jackson Inville has allowed the second highest explosive run

0:20:02.760 --> 0:20:07.080
<v Speaker 6>rate and the highest miss tackles per attempt. The Jaguars

0:20:07.080 --> 0:20:10.439
<v Speaker 6>have also yielded the most targets to running backs, so

0:20:10.480 --> 0:20:12.760
<v Speaker 6>it should be no surprise that they've allowed the most

0:20:12.760 --> 0:20:16.240
<v Speaker 6>receptions to the position. Love Ford and Hunt both this week.

0:20:17.240 --> 0:20:19.040
<v Speaker 3>I might have to move forward up our rankings a

0:20:19.080 --> 0:20:21.199
<v Speaker 3>little bit. I might have been a little softer on

0:20:21.280 --> 0:20:21.920
<v Speaker 3>Ford than I should.

0:20:22.160 --> 0:20:22.720
<v Speaker 6>I do it too.

0:20:23.160 --> 0:20:26.520
<v Speaker 3>That's some good of some compelling stuff. Right there. Mine

0:20:26.560 --> 0:20:30.040
<v Speaker 3>take a chance of me running back, going back to

0:20:30.080 --> 0:20:31.719
<v Speaker 3>the well because I hit on it last week, and

0:20:32.080 --> 0:20:34.960
<v Speaker 3>I need Damian Pierce. We need a late season revival

0:20:34.960 --> 0:20:37.760
<v Speaker 3>to make me look slightly less of a moron for

0:20:38.000 --> 0:20:41.480
<v Speaker 3>pushing the Damian Pierce narrative in the preseason.

0:20:41.680 --> 0:20:44.320
<v Speaker 7>Imagine he becomes a league winner. Now I like that

0:20:44.520 --> 0:20:46.440
<v Speaker 7>that you can crow, then you can peak.

0:20:46.800 --> 0:20:49.600
<v Speaker 3>I would feel so validated if that happened. It's it's

0:20:49.640 --> 0:20:52.480
<v Speaker 3>been a tough run for Damian Pierce, but hit last week.

0:20:52.480 --> 0:20:55.840
<v Speaker 3>We'll try it again here against the Jets. Last week,

0:20:56.320 --> 0:20:58.240
<v Speaker 3>he was the lead back for most of the game,

0:20:58.359 --> 0:21:00.919
<v Speaker 3>and you know, David Houston was with a lead for

0:21:00.960 --> 0:21:02.400
<v Speaker 3>most of the game and they ran him a lot.

0:21:02.440 --> 0:21:05.800
<v Speaker 3>He almost doubled the workload of Devin Singletary and the

0:21:05.880 --> 0:21:08.119
<v Speaker 3>Jets can't score. So I think Houston gets ahead in

0:21:08.160 --> 0:21:10.600
<v Speaker 3>this one as well. And it's not like Pierce dazzled

0:21:10.600 --> 0:21:14.160
<v Speaker 3>me with his running last week. Houston's run blocking isn't good.

0:21:14.359 --> 0:21:17.320
<v Speaker 3>They're twenty sixth then run block win rate. And really,

0:21:17.359 --> 0:21:19.440
<v Speaker 3>Pierce is a guy that could really you know, he's

0:21:19.520 --> 0:21:21.640
<v Speaker 3>more of a straight ahead guy who needs a little

0:21:21.640 --> 0:21:26.440
<v Speaker 3>bit of blocking help that he doesn't always get than still.

0:21:26.840 --> 0:21:30.200
<v Speaker 3>Jets an elite pass defense and a bad run defense,

0:21:30.280 --> 0:21:32.520
<v Speaker 3>so teams don't pass against them very much. In fact,

0:21:32.760 --> 0:21:35.960
<v Speaker 3>the Jets see the most rushes per game thirty three.

0:21:36.640 --> 0:21:38.280
<v Speaker 3>You know, if you tell me, Damian Pierce is going

0:21:38.359 --> 0:21:40.080
<v Speaker 3>to get the you know, the majority of the work,

0:21:40.160 --> 0:21:43.840
<v Speaker 3>maybe eighteen twenty of the thirty three. I don't know

0:21:43.880 --> 0:21:46.040
<v Speaker 3>how he doesn't end up with a meaningful box score here,

0:21:46.359 --> 0:21:50.240
<v Speaker 3>Damian Pierce against the Jets. Scott, who is your taking

0:21:50.320 --> 0:21:51.119
<v Speaker 3>chance on me? Receiver?

0:21:51.440 --> 0:21:52.680
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I'm going with Jayden Reed.

0:21:52.760 --> 0:21:55.480
<v Speaker 7>I'm stacking him with my quarterback here, Jordan Love might

0:21:55.600 --> 0:21:58.200
<v Speaker 7>take a chance on me quarterback. Giants will own sixth

0:21:58.240 --> 0:22:01.399
<v Speaker 7>most receptions seventh most receiving year. Cards Reid gets the

0:22:01.440 --> 0:22:04.439
<v Speaker 7>best matchup of the three with Cardell Flott in the slot.

0:22:05.200 --> 0:22:09.000
<v Speaker 7>It's possible Christian Wasston misses this game, which also would

0:22:09.000 --> 0:22:14.080
<v Speaker 7>add to possibly some extra touches for Jaden Reid. Giants

0:22:14.119 --> 0:22:16.800
<v Speaker 7>on the season fourth easiest matchup for wide receivers, but

0:22:16.880 --> 0:22:20.760
<v Speaker 7>since Week nine, they're the second easiest. Jaden Reid number

0:22:20.760 --> 0:22:23.359
<v Speaker 7>one or number two in targets on the team each

0:22:23.440 --> 0:22:25.280
<v Speaker 7>of the last five weeks.

0:22:26.960 --> 0:22:31.240
<v Speaker 3>Let's hope that. Let's hope he's healthy enough to participate fully. Yes,

0:22:31.359 --> 0:22:36.800
<v Speaker 3>game something we got yep, yeah, yep, Brian, you take

0:22:36.840 --> 0:22:37.760
<v Speaker 3>a chance from your receiver.

0:22:38.119 --> 0:22:41.760
<v Speaker 6>I got Houston's tight end Brevin Jordan at the Jets,

0:22:41.920 --> 0:22:44.520
<v Speaker 6>Dalton Schultz not expected to play and charts. You're one

0:22:44.560 --> 0:22:46.880
<v Speaker 6>hundred percent correct. Not many teams throw on the Jets.

0:22:46.920 --> 0:22:49.960
<v Speaker 6>When they do, it's the tight ends we're having success.

0:22:50.000 --> 0:22:52.520
<v Speaker 6>The Jets have allowed the second most touchdowns to the

0:22:52.560 --> 0:22:56.000
<v Speaker 6>tight end position too over their last three games. They've

0:22:56.000 --> 0:22:58.760
<v Speaker 6>also surrendered nearly one hundred and forty yards to the

0:22:58.800 --> 0:23:02.280
<v Speaker 6>position over their last two games. And with Tank Dell

0:23:02.400 --> 0:23:05.639
<v Speaker 6>now on ir there's targets to go around in Houston,

0:23:05.640 --> 0:23:07.560
<v Speaker 6>and I think CJ. Stroud is gonna be looking Brevin

0:23:07.640 --> 0:23:10.680
<v Speaker 6>Jordan's way a lot when he drops back on Sunday.

0:23:11.680 --> 0:23:14.919
<v Speaker 3>My take a chance on the receiver is also a

0:23:14.960 --> 0:23:17.960
<v Speaker 3>tight end. David and Joku, we've been man. We're all

0:23:17.960 --> 0:23:20.200
<v Speaker 3>Browns all the time here, which is a little bit weird.

0:23:20.720 --> 0:23:23.600
<v Speaker 3>Jaguars getting rocked by tight ends of late. The ranks

0:23:23.600 --> 0:23:26.840
<v Speaker 3>against tight ends in tight end yards allowed, Jacksonville ranks

0:23:27.200 --> 0:23:32.439
<v Speaker 3>thirty first in tight end receptions allowed. They rank thirty first.

0:23:32.920 --> 0:23:35.160
<v Speaker 3>So a lot of teams throwing to the tight end

0:23:35.160 --> 0:23:38.840
<v Speaker 3>and successfully. So here's just some recent box scores by

0:23:38.880 --> 0:23:42.440
<v Speaker 3>tight ends against Jacksonville. Last week, the Bengals anonymous tight

0:23:42.520 --> 0:23:45.480
<v Speaker 3>ends combined for six catches and fifty five yards. Two

0:23:45.560 --> 0:23:48.920
<v Speaker 3>weeks ago, Pat Fryarmouth nine receptions, one hundred and twenty

0:23:49.000 --> 0:23:54.359
<v Speaker 3>yards against Jacksonville Week ten, Dalton Schultz seventy one yards.

0:23:54.440 --> 0:23:57.639
<v Speaker 3>Week nine, Dalton Kincaid ten catches, eighty one yards. We

0:23:57.800 --> 0:24:00.000
<v Speaker 3>gave George Kittle nine catches, one hundred and forty nine.

0:24:00.400 --> 0:24:03.040
<v Speaker 3>I mean, tight ends are just getting it done against Jacksonville.

0:24:03.320 --> 0:24:07.360
<v Speaker 3>David and Joku. Next man up. Speaking of tight ends,

0:24:08.280 --> 0:24:11.120
<v Speaker 3>last segment, when I broke down the Bears, I failed

0:24:11.119 --> 0:24:13.679
<v Speaker 3>to mention Cole Kamet, So let me just do a

0:24:13.760 --> 0:24:16.160
<v Speaker 3>quick little add on for Cole Kmet in the chair

0:24:16.200 --> 0:24:19.800
<v Speaker 3>in the in the Chicago matchup. C grade for him.

0:24:20.080 --> 0:24:23.679
<v Speaker 3>He's he was way more productive under Tyson. Bagent is

0:24:23.760 --> 0:24:26.680
<v Speaker 3>not caught a touchdown pass since Week nine. He's gone

0:24:26.680 --> 0:24:30.240
<v Speaker 3>touchdownless in six of his last seven games. Detroit's middle

0:24:30.240 --> 0:24:32.400
<v Speaker 3>of the pack and receptions and yards allowed, but they

0:24:32.600 --> 0:24:35.720
<v Speaker 3>have allowed six tight end touchdowns. This season, which is

0:24:36.280 --> 0:24:40.040
<v Speaker 3>more than most anyway, but just three catches in the

0:24:40.080 --> 0:24:43.600
<v Speaker 3>meeting against Detroit a few weeks ago. And again Fields

0:24:43.640 --> 0:24:46.359
<v Speaker 3>doesn't go to Comet nearly as much as Bagen didn't,

0:24:46.359 --> 0:24:47.840
<v Speaker 3>and so you got to be a lot more careful

0:24:47.960 --> 0:24:49.000
<v Speaker 3>just to see grade on him.

0:24:49.160 --> 0:24:52.240
<v Speaker 6>You have now comet expectations for that matchup.

0:24:54.320 --> 0:25:01.040
<v Speaker 3>All right, Indianapolis takes on Cincinnati Scott and no Jonathan

0:25:01.040 --> 0:25:06.159
<v Speaker 3>Taylor in this game. Zach Moss got bottled up significantly

0:25:06.200 --> 0:25:09.679
<v Speaker 3>by a very good Tennessee run defense last week. What

0:25:09.720 --> 0:25:12.320
<v Speaker 3>do you think about the prospects here against Cincinnati?

0:25:12.520 --> 0:25:14.760
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, I actually have an a grade on Zach Moss here.

0:25:14.760 --> 0:25:16.840
<v Speaker 7>I think it's a really really good spot for him.

0:25:16.920 --> 0:25:19.240
<v Speaker 7>The nice part is he took every single running back

0:25:19.320 --> 0:25:22.520
<v Speaker 7>carry last week with Taryl with Taylor out right back

0:25:22.560 --> 0:25:25.920
<v Speaker 7>to his near twenty touches he was getting back when

0:25:25.920 --> 0:25:29.199
<v Speaker 7>Taylor was out before. Minshew also has Moss on his

0:25:29.320 --> 0:25:31.720
<v Speaker 7>fantasy team, which helps you. Could you could tell by

0:25:31.760 --> 0:25:35.720
<v Speaker 7>that even the interception for a touch interception he threw

0:25:35.720 --> 0:25:37.439
<v Speaker 7>at the goal line, he was trying to get it

0:25:37.480 --> 0:25:39.560
<v Speaker 7>to Moss, so we know he wants to get those

0:25:39.600 --> 0:25:43.040
<v Speaker 7>Moss points in there running backs with over sixteen touches

0:25:43.080 --> 0:25:46.040
<v Speaker 7>against the Bengals, and I went to sixteen just to

0:25:46.080 --> 0:25:48.959
<v Speaker 7>be safe. Even though Moss's touches without j TR twenty two,

0:25:49.080 --> 0:25:52.000
<v Speaker 7>thirty two, eighteen, twenty five, twenty one, they're way over that.

0:25:52.080 --> 0:25:53.119
<v Speaker 4>I'm being super safe.

0:25:53.600 --> 0:25:56.920
<v Speaker 7>Back's with more than sixteen touches against the Bengals average

0:25:57.000 --> 0:26:00.320
<v Speaker 7>one hundred and twenty five yards and mosquets all the work.

0:26:00.400 --> 0:26:02.800
<v Speaker 7>So I have an A grade here for Zach Moss.

0:26:04.080 --> 0:26:05.240
<v Speaker 7>It's finally happening for you.

0:26:05.359 --> 0:26:06.520
<v Speaker 4>Charge. I'm so happy for you.

0:26:06.680 --> 0:26:09.239
<v Speaker 3>I know, I know, I love it. I'm reveling this.

0:26:09.320 --> 0:26:12.280
<v Speaker 7>Trust me over to the passing game, Gardner Minshew, I

0:26:12.320 --> 0:26:15.240
<v Speaker 7>have a B grade on Bengals have allowed multiple scores

0:26:15.240 --> 0:26:17.520
<v Speaker 7>in for the last five. Of course, the one that

0:26:17.600 --> 0:26:20.240
<v Speaker 7>didn't was Kenny Pickett because he doesn't know how to get.

0:26:20.160 --> 0:26:21.560
<v Speaker 4>Multiple score games.

0:26:22.080 --> 0:26:24.320
<v Speaker 7>You really do have to pick your spots with Minshew,

0:26:24.440 --> 0:26:26.760
<v Speaker 7>like Thor did last week, as is, take a chance

0:26:26.800 --> 0:26:29.600
<v Speaker 7>on me player, and he delivered with three hundred plus

0:26:29.640 --> 0:26:32.359
<v Speaker 7>and two scores. I think this is another one. Nine

0:26:32.359 --> 0:26:38.239
<v Speaker 7>of the twelve scoring starting quarterbacks against the Colts had

0:26:38.280 --> 0:26:40.639
<v Speaker 7>three hundred plus and or a score. It's a decent spot.

0:26:40.720 --> 0:26:44.119
<v Speaker 7>B grade on Gardner Minshew. I do have an A

0:26:44.280 --> 0:26:47.600
<v Speaker 7>grade on Michael Pittman, who's seen about one hundred targets

0:26:47.640 --> 0:26:49.400
<v Speaker 7>per game with Minshew, I believe.

0:26:49.119 --> 0:26:50.440
<v Speaker 4>That that is accurate.

0:26:51.000 --> 0:26:54.399
<v Speaker 7>The Bengals are allowing highest A dot to lead in

0:26:54.440 --> 0:26:56.920
<v Speaker 7>the league to wide receivers, which is really good for

0:26:57.640 --> 0:27:01.240
<v Speaker 7>Pittman here twelve plus targets in three straight, eight plus

0:27:01.280 --> 0:27:04.040
<v Speaker 7>catches in five straight, one hundred plus yards and back

0:27:04.080 --> 0:27:06.439
<v Speaker 7>to back Biggels are middle of the pack, but he

0:27:06.520 --> 0:27:09.480
<v Speaker 7>gets the best matchup in Shoudobi a Woozier allowing a

0:27:09.520 --> 0:27:12.960
<v Speaker 7>one to twelve passer rating against. I do have Josh

0:27:12.960 --> 0:27:14.840
<v Speaker 7>Downs and now Pierce on the bench. I know Eli

0:27:14.920 --> 0:27:17.679
<v Speaker 7>Pierce had caught all three of his targets for one

0:27:17.720 --> 0:27:20.840
<v Speaker 7>hundred yards last week. He was targeting the end zone twice.

0:27:21.280 --> 0:27:24.800
<v Speaker 7>I don't know that it's sustainable. And Josh Downs, he

0:27:24.920 --> 0:27:27.560
<v Speaker 7>really shows up in great slot matchups. This is the

0:27:27.560 --> 0:27:29.359
<v Speaker 7>middle of the pack one I have him on the bench.

0:27:29.400 --> 0:27:31.200
<v Speaker 7>It wouldn't surprise me for one of them to hit.

0:27:31.600 --> 0:27:32.879
<v Speaker 7>But I have him on the bench. I don't think

0:27:32.880 --> 0:27:36.680
<v Speaker 7>you can trust him here. C grade on Kylin grantson

0:27:36.800 --> 0:27:39.320
<v Speaker 7>I'll touch on Granson real quick here two to four

0:27:39.359 --> 0:27:42.320
<v Speaker 7>catches in every game before his injury. Came back, had

0:27:42.359 --> 0:27:45.280
<v Speaker 7>three for seventy two last week. Since he is the

0:27:45.400 --> 0:27:49.440
<v Speaker 7>second best matchup for tight ends. Even Evan Ingram scored

0:27:49.800 --> 0:27:52.280
<v Speaker 7>last week against Cincinnati TV.

0:27:52.600 --> 0:27:54.720
<v Speaker 3>That was my take a chance on me receiver last week.

0:27:55.000 --> 0:27:58.359
<v Speaker 7>I am yeah, yeah, nine for Let me see if

0:27:58.400 --> 0:27:59.920
<v Speaker 7>I can find a peacock real quick.

0:28:00.119 --> 0:28:00.960
<v Speaker 3>It's near the top.

0:28:01.160 --> 0:28:02.280
<v Speaker 4>It's near the top. Thank you.

0:28:02.280 --> 0:28:03.959
<v Speaker 6>By Are you going to be able to work in

0:28:04.080 --> 0:28:06.760
<v Speaker 6>a dig on Kyle Pitts in this breakdown or no?

0:28:07.320 --> 0:28:09.879
<v Speaker 4>I've been this chair. I feely like diggy Dodd Pitts.

0:28:09.920 --> 0:28:11.320
<v Speaker 4>It's weird how that happens.

0:28:12.000 --> 0:28:14.720
<v Speaker 7>Friarmouth had nine for one to twenty the week before, Kincaid,

0:28:14.760 --> 0:28:17.560
<v Speaker 7>Kittle and Schultz at seventy plus. That's just in the

0:28:17.600 --> 0:28:20.040
<v Speaker 7>last six weeks, ten different tight ends have gone for

0:28:20.080 --> 0:28:23.080
<v Speaker 7>seventy plus and or a score on this Bengals team.

0:28:23.080 --> 0:28:24.600
<v Speaker 7>I have a C grade on Grands and I think

0:28:24.600 --> 0:28:25.840
<v Speaker 7>he's a good dart throw there.

0:28:25.840 --> 0:28:26.680
<v Speaker 4>Well se grade.

0:28:26.720 --> 0:28:29.879
<v Speaker 7>Anyway, over to the Cincinnati side, Jake Browning I do

0:28:29.960 --> 0:28:31.560
<v Speaker 7>have on the bench. I know he threw a lot

0:28:31.560 --> 0:28:34.359
<v Speaker 7>of short passes last week. But this is the middle

0:28:34.560 --> 0:28:38.560
<v Speaker 7>pack on the season. Defense the Colts are, but since

0:28:38.560 --> 0:28:41.720
<v Speaker 7>Week five, only one quarterback has had over two hundred

0:28:41.720 --> 0:28:44.440
<v Speaker 7>and twenty five yards and only three multi score games

0:28:44.480 --> 0:28:48.120
<v Speaker 7>on the season. Bengals are fourth best against quarterbacks over

0:28:48.160 --> 0:28:50.760
<v Speaker 7>their last five or sorry, the Colts are fourth best

0:28:50.760 --> 0:28:52.120
<v Speaker 7>against quarterbacks over the last five.

0:28:52.400 --> 0:28:53.560
<v Speaker 4>I have Browning on the bench.

0:28:53.600 --> 0:28:55.840
<v Speaker 7>I'm still giving an A grade to Jamar Chase though,

0:28:55.920 --> 0:28:59.400
<v Speaker 7>over fifty percent target chair last week, over forty percent

0:28:59.480 --> 0:29:03.360
<v Speaker 7>with brown in the lineup. Also a thirty three percent

0:29:03.560 --> 0:29:06.640
<v Speaker 7>end zone target share with Browning in the lineup. It's

0:29:06.720 --> 0:29:09.440
<v Speaker 7>just he's just doing too good. He's gonna get Jalen

0:29:09.520 --> 0:29:12.280
<v Speaker 7>Jones ninety five point eight passer rating against. But I'm

0:29:12.320 --> 0:29:14.720
<v Speaker 7>still giving it an A grade here. I have the

0:29:14.800 --> 0:29:18.440
<v Speaker 7>other wide receivers on the bench, though, Tyler Bord Tyler

0:29:18.480 --> 0:29:21.320
<v Speaker 7>Boyd last week was a great slot matchup for him.

0:29:21.680 --> 0:29:24.920
<v Speaker 7>Not so much this week. T Higgins was barely targeted.

0:29:25.280 --> 0:29:28.240
<v Speaker 7>His game is deeper and the Colts that's what they

0:29:28.320 --> 0:29:32.000
<v Speaker 7>what they defend the best is deeper and Browning it

0:29:32.000 --> 0:29:34.400
<v Speaker 7>seems like he's throwing short a lot, so it's really

0:29:34.400 --> 0:29:37.280
<v Speaker 7>not meant for t Higgins game, so I have him

0:29:37.320 --> 0:29:39.800
<v Speaker 7>on the bench as well. Tanner Hudson's a little bit

0:29:39.840 --> 0:29:42.000
<v Speaker 7>of a dart throw. Four plus catches in five straight

0:29:42.080 --> 0:29:45.200
<v Speaker 7>but thirty to forty five yards in all of them.

0:29:45.480 --> 0:29:48.360
<v Speaker 7>Feels like a safe seven points. But he doesn't score.

0:29:48.400 --> 0:29:50.320
<v Speaker 7>It doesn't have a red zone target, doesn't have an

0:29:50.440 --> 0:29:53.480
<v Speaker 7>end zone target, and Colts have only allowed one tight

0:29:53.560 --> 0:29:56.200
<v Speaker 7>end touchdown on the year. So pure dart throw, but

0:29:56.240 --> 0:29:58.600
<v Speaker 7>I have him on the bench. A grade on Joe

0:29:58.680 --> 0:30:01.840
<v Speaker 7>Mixon kind of what I say about Chase Brown. Colts

0:30:01.840 --> 0:30:05.520
<v Speaker 7>are fourth worst against running backs. They allow a ton

0:30:05.560 --> 0:30:07.680
<v Speaker 7>of running back touches. There should be enough for both

0:30:07.720 --> 0:30:09.560
<v Speaker 7>of them. But all that stuff I said in the

0:30:09.640 --> 0:30:11.880
<v Speaker 7>last segment still stands for Joe mix and I have

0:30:11.920 --> 0:30:14.600
<v Speaker 7>an A grade here. Hopefully there's enough for Chase Brown.

0:30:14.720 --> 0:30:16.120
<v Speaker 7>Might take a chance on meat player.

0:30:16.960 --> 0:30:19.280
<v Speaker 3>All right, Well, let's head to a break and when

0:30:19.280 --> 0:30:22.280
<v Speaker 3>we come back, Jacksonville taking on Cleveland. We've already talked

0:30:22.280 --> 0:30:26.160
<v Speaker 3>about a lot of Brown's maybe the Jacksonville side, unknown

0:30:26.360 --> 0:30:30.080
<v Speaker 3>quarterback situation at this time, Who do you dare trust

0:30:30.080 --> 0:30:32.600
<v Speaker 3>out of Jacksonville? No, Christian Kirk. A lot of things

0:30:32.640 --> 0:30:34.840
<v Speaker 3>up in the air on the Jaguars side. Stay tuned

0:30:34.880 --> 0:31:10.760
<v Speaker 3>to Fantasy Football Weekly to find out Welcome back Fantasy

0:31:10.880 --> 0:31:14.280
<v Speaker 3>Football Weekly. Another big block of matchups for you, beginning

0:31:14.280 --> 0:31:17.040
<v Speaker 3>with Jacksonville taking on Cleveland. Brian, we talked a lot

0:31:17.040 --> 0:31:19.680
<v Speaker 3>about Cleveland already, but let's go to the Jacksonville side.

0:31:19.720 --> 0:31:22.640
<v Speaker 3>No Christian Kirk and we're not sure who the quarterback

0:31:22.760 --> 0:31:24.440
<v Speaker 3>is going to be in this one. What do you think?

0:31:25.120 --> 0:31:28.200
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I mean you would assume that Trevor Lawrence would

0:31:28.200 --> 0:31:30.360
<v Speaker 6>have been ruled out by now, but he's shaping up

0:31:30.400 --> 0:31:32.800
<v Speaker 6>to be a game time decision. He might go with

0:31:32.880 --> 0:31:35.800
<v Speaker 6>that ankle injury. But it's a brutal matchup, the Browns

0:31:35.840 --> 0:31:38.760
<v Speaker 6>allowing just one hundred and seventy three passing yards and

0:31:38.840 --> 0:31:42.000
<v Speaker 6>one passing touchdown per game. They're also going to get

0:31:42.040 --> 0:31:45.440
<v Speaker 6>back stud cornerback Denzel Ward, who has missed the last

0:31:45.480 --> 0:31:48.600
<v Speaker 6>two games. So you just gotta prepare for Lawrence to

0:31:48.640 --> 0:31:50.240
<v Speaker 6>be on your bench, and even if he starts, I

0:31:50.240 --> 0:31:51.760
<v Speaker 6>got him on the bench. I think you should roll

0:31:51.800 --> 0:31:54.480
<v Speaker 6>with one of our take on quarterbacks over him this

0:31:54.480 --> 0:31:56.280
<v Speaker 6>week in a bad matchup. And there's gonna be some

0:31:56.320 --> 0:31:58.920
<v Speaker 6>weather in this game too. It's not a total stopper

0:31:59.200 --> 0:32:01.520
<v Speaker 6>by any means. It's going to be wet in Cleveland

0:32:01.520 --> 0:32:04.120
<v Speaker 6>most likely, so I'm playing it safe with Lawrence. He's

0:32:04.120 --> 0:32:07.240
<v Speaker 6>on the bench. The only other player in the passing

0:32:07.240 --> 0:32:09.600
<v Speaker 6>game I'm giving a starting grade to is Calvin Ridley.

0:32:10.160 --> 0:32:12.720
<v Speaker 6>He gets a CE. Since Week eight, Cleveland has allowed

0:32:12.720 --> 0:32:17.560
<v Speaker 6>the fourth lowess PPR points per target to boundary wide receivers.

0:32:17.560 --> 0:32:20.720
<v Speaker 6>That's not good. And again denzil Ward expected back, So

0:32:21.520 --> 0:32:24.720
<v Speaker 6>temporary expectations for Ridley. I can't fault you if you

0:32:24.800 --> 0:32:26.320
<v Speaker 6>bench it for someone else, but I will give him

0:32:26.320 --> 0:32:28.760
<v Speaker 6>a C grade. But again, everyone else on the bench,

0:32:28.800 --> 0:32:32.680
<v Speaker 6>including Evan Ingram. The Browns have allowed only three receiving

0:32:32.720 --> 0:32:36.280
<v Speaker 6>two receiving touchdowns to tight ends all season, and two

0:32:36.320 --> 0:32:38.560
<v Speaker 6>of those came from Mark Andrews back in Week four,

0:32:38.920 --> 0:32:42.080
<v Speaker 6>opposing tight ends or averaging just two catches in twenty

0:32:42.080 --> 0:32:45.320
<v Speaker 6>two yards per game against Cleveland, So Ingram on the

0:32:45.320 --> 0:32:47.840
<v Speaker 6>bench even in the tight end wasteland. And lastly for

0:32:47.880 --> 0:32:51.520
<v Speaker 6>the Jaguars, Travis Etn just to see for him. Etn

0:32:51.560 --> 0:32:54.360
<v Speaker 6>has not hit eighty rushing yards since Week five, and

0:32:54.440 --> 0:32:57.040
<v Speaker 6>in fact, he's only breached that mark on the ground

0:32:57.160 --> 0:33:02.680
<v Speaker 6>twice this season. Etn definitely slumpling, slumping, excuse me slumping,

0:33:03.000 --> 0:33:06.080
<v Speaker 6>and this isn't exactly a get right game opposing backs

0:33:06.120 --> 0:33:09.600
<v Speaker 6>or averaging one hundred eleven combo yards per game against Cleveland,

0:33:09.800 --> 0:33:12.680
<v Speaker 6>who has surrendered only eight total touchdowns to the position

0:33:13.080 --> 0:33:15.920
<v Speaker 6>all season. Over at the Cleveland side, we already said

0:33:15.960 --> 0:33:17.560
<v Speaker 6>out Joe Flacco, as might take a chance on me,

0:33:17.640 --> 0:33:19.920
<v Speaker 6>quarterback David and Joku is your take a chance on me?

0:33:20.040 --> 0:33:20.400
<v Speaker 5>Receiver?

0:33:20.920 --> 0:33:23.120
<v Speaker 6>Over to the wide receivers for the Browns, I got

0:33:23.160 --> 0:33:26.160
<v Speaker 6>a B for Elijah Moore and a CE on Amari Cooper.

0:33:26.360 --> 0:33:29.120
<v Speaker 6>Cooper looks like he's trending towards playing. He practiced on Friday.

0:33:29.160 --> 0:33:31.920
<v Speaker 6>He's been in concussion protocol and nursing a rib injury

0:33:32.160 --> 0:33:34.320
<v Speaker 6>that he's been playing through, so it's really all about

0:33:34.320 --> 0:33:36.600
<v Speaker 6>the concussion. But it looks like Cooper will be cleared.

0:33:36.920 --> 0:33:38.400
<v Speaker 6>So A see for Cooper and I get a be

0:33:38.560 --> 0:33:41.280
<v Speaker 6>on More. Saw twelve targets last week with Joe Flacco

0:33:41.360 --> 0:33:44.440
<v Speaker 6>under center. That will likely be the case again this week,

0:33:44.600 --> 0:33:47.320
<v Speaker 6>meaning Flacco will be under sender and the Jaguars have

0:33:47.360 --> 0:33:50.520
<v Speaker 6>surrendered the third most wide receiver touchdowns this season and

0:33:50.520 --> 0:33:53.680
<v Speaker 6>at least one wide receiver touchdown in every game they

0:33:53.680 --> 0:33:56.760
<v Speaker 6>have played. And lastly to the running game for the Browns.

0:33:56.760 --> 0:33:59.000
<v Speaker 6>I got to be on Jerome Ford again, a great

0:33:59.000 --> 0:34:01.760
<v Speaker 6>matchup for both he and Kareem Hunt, whos might take

0:34:01.760 --> 0:34:04.480
<v Speaker 6>a chance and be running back. Since week eight, Jacksonville

0:34:04.480 --> 0:34:07.200
<v Speaker 6>has allowed the second highest explosive run rate and the

0:34:07.280 --> 0:34:10.360
<v Speaker 6>highest miss tackles per attempt, and they've also allowed the

0:34:10.400 --> 0:34:11.920
<v Speaker 6>most catches to the running back position.

0:34:13.000 --> 0:34:15.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's all that all trends very very well. And

0:34:15.440 --> 0:34:17.880
<v Speaker 3>tip of the hat to Thor last week for nailing

0:34:17.880 --> 0:34:21.719
<v Speaker 3>Elijah Moore as well. Nicely done in abstentia. We will

0:34:21.719 --> 0:34:24.080
<v Speaker 3>give him. Can we peacock him in an abstentia? Is

0:34:24.120 --> 0:34:28.760
<v Speaker 3>that possible? I would do that. There we go, Rams

0:34:28.800 --> 0:34:31.840
<v Speaker 3>taking on the Baltimore Ravens. Brian, you love this a

0:34:32.000 --> 0:34:33.400
<v Speaker 3>great and Kyrone Williams.

0:34:33.560 --> 0:34:33.759
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:34:34.680 --> 0:34:37.279
<v Speaker 3>The workload is just huge at this point. Last week

0:34:37.320 --> 0:34:39.759
<v Speaker 3>he played ninety four percent of the snaps and got

0:34:39.760 --> 0:34:42.920
<v Speaker 3>twenty six opportunities. Since week two, when he became the

0:34:42.960 --> 0:34:47.200
<v Speaker 3>starter over Acres, Kyron has seen twenty two opportunities per

0:34:47.280 --> 0:34:49.960
<v Speaker 3>game and he's averaging one hundred and sixteen total yards

0:34:49.960 --> 0:34:52.239
<v Speaker 3>per game. The one area where the Ravens defense is

0:34:52.320 --> 0:34:54.239
<v Speaker 3>vulnerable is against the run. They're just a middle of

0:34:54.239 --> 0:34:56.640
<v Speaker 3>the pack run defense. They ranked twelfth and sixteenth in

0:34:56.719 --> 0:35:00.359
<v Speaker 3>rushing and receiving yards allowed to runners, respectively. Are going

0:35:00.360 --> 0:35:01.840
<v Speaker 3>to pull an up set here. It's almost certainly going

0:35:01.920 --> 0:35:05.680
<v Speaker 3>to go through Kyron Williams with an A grade, and

0:35:05.800 --> 0:35:08.040
<v Speaker 3>we're a lot more skeptical about the passing game in

0:35:08.080 --> 0:35:11.880
<v Speaker 3>this one, a lot more. Let's start with Stafford. Brutal

0:35:11.920 --> 0:35:14.600
<v Speaker 3>matchup for him. The Ravens ranked second in pass coverage

0:35:14.640 --> 0:35:17.920
<v Speaker 3>by Pro Football Focus. They've only given up multiple passing

0:35:17.960 --> 0:35:22.799
<v Speaker 3>touchdowns two times all year. Baltimore has more interceptions than

0:35:22.920 --> 0:35:26.799
<v Speaker 3>touchdown passes allowed. In his five road games so far,

0:35:27.320 --> 0:35:31.959
<v Speaker 3>Stafford has seven touchdown passes, and other than his four

0:35:32.040 --> 0:35:35.120
<v Speaker 3>touchdown blow up a week or two ago, Stafford's really

0:35:35.160 --> 0:35:37.680
<v Speaker 3>been really like a one touchdown guy, and that's probably

0:35:37.680 --> 0:35:40.640
<v Speaker 3>where we're sitting here. Puka Nakula comes in with a

0:35:40.640 --> 0:35:43.240
<v Speaker 3>C grade, coming off a great game last week. Baltimore

0:35:43.239 --> 0:35:47.120
<v Speaker 3>plays overwhelmingly man coverage, and since Cooper Cup's return in

0:35:47.160 --> 0:35:50.759
<v Speaker 3>Week five, Nicoua has led rams wide receivers and receptions

0:35:50.800 --> 0:35:53.600
<v Speaker 3>against man and has been far more effective than Cup

0:35:53.640 --> 0:35:57.320
<v Speaker 3>as well. In man coverage. The Ravens get back cornerback

0:35:57.320 --> 0:36:00.719
<v Speaker 3>Marlon Humphrey from injury working against Nakua. He's very good

0:36:01.040 --> 0:36:06.400
<v Speaker 3>no receiver. His top two catches or nine yards against

0:36:06.400 --> 0:36:10.319
<v Speaker 3>Marlon Humphrey since way back in Week five. So a

0:36:10.560 --> 0:36:12.880
<v Speaker 3>very tough matchup for Nikua. But I'm still giving him

0:36:12.880 --> 0:36:17.000
<v Speaker 3>a C grade in this one. And I'm benching Cooper Cup. No,

0:36:17.320 --> 0:36:21.280
<v Speaker 3>he hasn't top fifty yards fifty Cooper Cup fifty yards

0:36:21.320 --> 0:36:24.680
<v Speaker 3>in six straight games. He's playing on two hobbled ankles.

0:36:25.000 --> 0:36:28.120
<v Speaker 3>Safety Kyle Hamilton man's the slot often and he's just

0:36:28.160 --> 0:36:30.680
<v Speaker 3>a menace. Over the past five weeks, he's allowing two

0:36:30.680 --> 0:36:33.600
<v Speaker 3>receptions for twelve yards per game on a passer rating

0:36:33.640 --> 0:36:36.279
<v Speaker 3>of fifty eight. And that's it. So I just I

0:36:36.320 --> 0:36:38.799
<v Speaker 3>can't advocate starting Cooper Cup here at a game you need.

0:36:39.200 --> 0:36:41.799
<v Speaker 3>And then Tyler Higbee doubtful, not expected to play in

0:36:41.840 --> 0:36:44.640
<v Speaker 3>this game, so don't use him. Let's go to the

0:36:44.719 --> 0:36:48.000
<v Speaker 3>Baltimore side. I think I'll start with I think I'll

0:36:48.000 --> 0:36:49.960
<v Speaker 3>start with the running game here. How about Gus Edwards

0:36:50.320 --> 0:36:54.400
<v Speaker 3>snapshare decreasing in three straight games, bottoming out at only

0:36:54.440 --> 0:36:58.080
<v Speaker 3>twenty seven percent rushing share in their last game before

0:36:58.120 --> 0:37:01.240
<v Speaker 3>last week's by the Rams will allow the seventh fewest

0:37:01.280 --> 0:37:05.240
<v Speaker 3>total yards to opposing running backs, and more troubling edwards

0:37:05.239 --> 0:37:08.319
<v Speaker 3>has become totally touchdown dependent, and the Rams only give

0:37:08.400 --> 0:37:12.279
<v Speaker 3>up half a touchdown to the position per game. That's

0:37:12.320 --> 0:37:16.400
<v Speaker 3>eighth best. So all you can do is hope for

0:37:16.480 --> 0:37:18.320
<v Speaker 3>a touchdown. I can only give you a C grade,

0:37:18.320 --> 0:37:20.960
<v Speaker 3>and it's on the hope for like two yard touchdown plunge.

0:37:21.040 --> 0:37:21.319
<v Speaker 5>That's it.

0:37:22.000 --> 0:37:25.239
<v Speaker 3>How about Keith Mitchell, so his snapcher increasing in four

0:37:25.280 --> 0:37:28.319
<v Speaker 3>straight weeks, his gusses is going down topping out at

0:37:28.360 --> 0:37:31.319
<v Speaker 3>forty six percent snap share in the last game before

0:37:31.360 --> 0:37:34.080
<v Speaker 3>the buy tough matchup, though, In addition to not allowing

0:37:34.120 --> 0:37:36.560
<v Speaker 3>rushing yards to touchdowns, the Rams allow a league low

0:37:37.040 --> 0:37:41.279
<v Speaker 3>twenty receiving yards per game to opposing running backs. That

0:37:41.360 --> 0:37:44.279
<v Speaker 3>impacts Mitchell for sure. He's a receiving back and he's

0:37:44.280 --> 0:37:45.839
<v Speaker 3>had a lot of his success through the air. It's

0:37:45.880 --> 0:37:49.120
<v Speaker 3>not likely to happen here. Since LA's Week ten by

0:37:49.440 --> 0:37:54.360
<v Speaker 3>no back his top forty eight rushing yards, thirty or

0:37:54.400 --> 0:37:57.680
<v Speaker 3>thirty three receiving yards or scored against the Rams. So

0:37:57.800 --> 0:38:00.440
<v Speaker 3>this is a very tough spot Spot just got a

0:38:00.480 --> 0:38:03.480
<v Speaker 3>C grade on Keaton Mitchell. Let's go to the passing game.

0:38:03.520 --> 0:38:06.200
<v Speaker 3>I'm gonna start with Isaiah Likely. The Rams are terrible

0:38:06.200 --> 0:38:08.640
<v Speaker 3>against the tight end, give up the six month yards

0:38:08.640 --> 0:38:11.719
<v Speaker 3>and the second most scores to the position, So there's

0:38:11.760 --> 0:38:15.920
<v Speaker 3>a good chance that Lamar's best path to air production

0:38:16.080 --> 0:38:19.279
<v Speaker 3>is through Isaiah Likely. And the one full game likely

0:38:19.360 --> 0:38:22.880
<v Speaker 3>is played without Mark Andrews. He led the Ravens and targets,

0:38:22.880 --> 0:38:26.359
<v Speaker 3>receptions and receiving yards. So I like Isaiah Likely here

0:38:26.360 --> 0:38:28.560
<v Speaker 3>and he comes in with a solid B grade and

0:38:28.600 --> 0:38:30.600
<v Speaker 3>he's in my top five at the position this week

0:38:30.640 --> 0:38:33.279
<v Speaker 3>as well. Zay Flowers. Great to see him in the

0:38:33.360 --> 0:38:36.040
<v Speaker 3>end zone last week. It's kind a sight we haven't

0:38:36.040 --> 0:38:39.560
<v Speaker 3>seen very often. I'm less optimistic about it here. He

0:38:39.640 --> 0:38:41.560
<v Speaker 3>runs from all parts of the field and he's got

0:38:41.560 --> 0:38:43.759
<v Speaker 3>neutral matchups in all three of those spots against all

0:38:43.800 --> 0:38:48.200
<v Speaker 3>three of the Rams cornerbacks. Importantly, Flowers saw eight targets

0:38:48.280 --> 0:38:52.239
<v Speaker 3>with Mark Andrews missing last week. That's his first time

0:38:52.560 --> 0:38:55.440
<v Speaker 3>reaching that mark since Week eight. He's the only receiver

0:38:55.520 --> 0:38:58.800
<v Speaker 3>with enough volume to warrant starting consideration among the Ravens.

0:38:58.840 --> 0:39:01.120
<v Speaker 3>He comes in with a C grade and that just

0:39:01.239 --> 0:39:05.520
<v Speaker 3>leaves us with Lamar Jackson. Over the past five weeks,

0:39:05.600 --> 0:39:12.680
<v Speaker 3>Lamar Jackson's Fantasy points, he ranks as quarterback eighteen, with

0:39:12.960 --> 0:39:17.000
<v Speaker 3>just four total touchdowns, none of them on the ground,

0:39:17.200 --> 0:39:20.359
<v Speaker 3>which are usually worth more than the passing touchdowns. That

0:39:20.360 --> 0:39:23.040
<v Speaker 3>doesn't always mean that Lamar Jackson is playing badly, but

0:39:23.200 --> 0:39:26.360
<v Speaker 3>his fifty rushing yards per game is just not enough

0:39:26.400 --> 0:39:29.680
<v Speaker 3>to sustain you when he's only averaging two hundred and

0:39:29.719 --> 0:39:33.799
<v Speaker 3>sixteen passing yards and one passing touchdown per game. That

0:39:33.920 --> 0:39:36.600
<v Speaker 3>is a Gardner Minshew level of passing, and the Rams

0:39:36.640 --> 0:39:39.400
<v Speaker 3>are a pretty good pass defense. They've held nine of

0:39:39.440 --> 0:39:43.640
<v Speaker 3>twelve opponents to zero or one passing touchdown and only

0:39:43.640 --> 0:39:46.600
<v Speaker 3>two quarterbacks of top three hundred yards all year. LA

0:39:46.680 --> 0:39:49.120
<v Speaker 3>is vulnerable on the ground. All four mobile quarterbacks to

0:39:49.120 --> 0:39:51.439
<v Speaker 3>face LA have scored her top forty seven rushing yards.

0:39:51.440 --> 0:39:53.839
<v Speaker 3>So I think you're gonna get another good ground game

0:39:53.880 --> 0:39:56.480
<v Speaker 3>from Jackson, But like it's been a lot lately, I

0:39:56.480 --> 0:39:58.279
<v Speaker 3>don't think he's going to chip in much through the air.

0:39:58.680 --> 0:40:02.719
<v Speaker 3>We've got a B grade on Lamar Jackson. Okay, all right,

0:40:02.840 --> 0:40:06.560
<v Speaker 3>let's move over to Tampa Bay taking on Atlanta. Scott

0:40:06.840 --> 0:40:11.520
<v Speaker 3>Baker Mayfield. I think you quietly playing pretty good football,

0:40:11.560 --> 0:40:13.479
<v Speaker 3>but a lot of tough matchups and it doesn't always

0:40:13.520 --> 0:40:15.160
<v Speaker 3>materialize to a lot of fantasy points.

0:40:15.360 --> 0:40:18.239
<v Speaker 7>Yeah here, and this would normally be a tough matchup here,

0:40:18.600 --> 0:40:20.680
<v Speaker 7>I have a C grade on him. I'm willing to

0:40:20.719 --> 0:40:23.600
<v Speaker 7>move to a bench. But right now the Falcons could

0:40:23.680 --> 0:40:27.839
<v Speaker 7>be without cornerbacks AJ Terrell who's in concussion protocol, Jeff

0:40:27.880 --> 0:40:31.439
<v Speaker 7>Alcuda with an undisclosed injury, and Mike Cues with an

0:40:31.640 --> 0:40:34.719
<v Speaker 7>hand injury, So if their entire defensive backfield.

0:40:34.280 --> 0:40:37.160
<v Speaker 4>Is out, I feel a little bit better about a

0:40:37.200 --> 0:40:38.040
<v Speaker 4>C grade here.

0:40:38.600 --> 0:40:41.920
<v Speaker 7>The Falcons haven't a lot of passing touchdown for three weeks. Okay,

0:40:41.960 --> 0:40:44.239
<v Speaker 7>so they faced Kyler in his first game and Derek

0:40:44.280 --> 0:40:47.920
<v Speaker 7>Carr and Tim Boyle, but before that they gave up

0:40:48.000 --> 0:40:51.520
<v Speaker 7>multiple scores in three of four, so it's possible he

0:40:51.560 --> 0:40:54.560
<v Speaker 7>has an OKDA. We need to watch that defensive backfield, though.

0:40:55.560 --> 0:40:58.600
<v Speaker 7>A grade on Mike Evans. Evans had six for eighty

0:40:58.680 --> 0:41:01.520
<v Speaker 7>two and a score received on eight targets in Week

0:41:01.600 --> 0:41:05.960
<v Speaker 7>seven against these Falcons, and Aj Terrell was shadowing him

0:41:05.960 --> 0:41:09.919
<v Speaker 7>that game, so if he's gone, expect better. Thirty three

0:41:09.960 --> 0:41:12.160
<v Speaker 7>percent target share from Mike Evans over the last month,

0:41:12.200 --> 0:41:14.279
<v Speaker 7>and we've talked about his end zone targets. He just

0:41:14.360 --> 0:41:17.880
<v Speaker 7>always scores. It feels like Mike Evans does C grade

0:41:17.880 --> 0:41:21.920
<v Speaker 7>on Chris Godwin. I don't love it, but held catchless

0:41:21.960 --> 0:41:24.160
<v Speaker 7>last week, but he did score on a nineteen yard

0:41:24.239 --> 0:41:28.600
<v Speaker 7>rushing touchdown. The matchup against a completely beat up secondary

0:41:28.880 --> 0:41:31.920
<v Speaker 7>is nice. But if all those players or most of

0:41:31.960 --> 0:41:34.640
<v Speaker 7>those some of those players go, maybe bench Chris Godwin,

0:41:34.680 --> 0:41:36.080
<v Speaker 7>but I have a C grade on him for now

0:41:36.120 --> 0:41:39.840
<v Speaker 7>with the matchup. Kate Aughten runs a ton of the routes,

0:41:39.880 --> 0:41:42.600
<v Speaker 7>but goosag last week. He disappears at times too hard

0:41:42.640 --> 0:41:46.520
<v Speaker 7>to trust bench for cad Aughten. B grade on Rashad

0:41:46.600 --> 0:41:49.880
<v Speaker 7>White over the last five why is averaging over twenty touches,

0:41:49.920 --> 0:41:52.960
<v Speaker 7>four of those being catches. He scored five times in

0:41:53.000 --> 0:41:56.120
<v Speaker 7>the last five games. No other Tampa Bay back has

0:41:56.160 --> 0:41:59.560
<v Speaker 7>had more than five touches in a game since Week six.

0:42:00.840 --> 0:42:03.800
<v Speaker 7>Falcons are really good against fantasy running backs, but mostly

0:42:03.880 --> 0:42:06.840
<v Speaker 7>it's because the scores. They've only allowed three total scores

0:42:06.840 --> 0:42:10.880
<v Speaker 7>and all three were receiving no rushing scores. White total

0:42:11.000 --> 0:42:13.400
<v Speaker 7>had ninety nine total yards in their first meeting on

0:42:13.520 --> 0:42:17.880
<v Speaker 7>nineteen touches, nineteen plus touches against guys against the Falcons

0:42:18.239 --> 0:42:21.920
<v Speaker 7>averaged ninety yards. They averaged ninety one yards. Actually, so

0:42:22.080 --> 0:42:25.319
<v Speaker 7>ninety plus yards four plus catches. I can see a

0:42:25.360 --> 0:42:26.960
<v Speaker 7>B grade here if he gets in the end zone.

0:42:26.960 --> 0:42:31.080
<v Speaker 7>Even better over to the Atlanta side I have ridden

0:42:31.200 --> 0:42:33.879
<v Speaker 7>on the bench. Good quarterbacks do well against Tampa. Bad

0:42:33.880 --> 0:42:36.560
<v Speaker 7>ones do bad. Ridder did two hundred and eighty nine

0:42:36.640 --> 0:42:40.040
<v Speaker 7>scoreless yards last time I have him on the bench. Sorry,

0:42:40.560 --> 0:42:43.360
<v Speaker 7>Drake Lennon, I'm giving a C grade too. It's really tough,

0:42:43.480 --> 0:42:46.239
<v Speaker 7>but five receivers have been over fifty yards against the

0:42:46.280 --> 0:42:49.440
<v Speaker 7>Bucks in the last three weeks. He's been sea level,

0:42:49.560 --> 0:42:52.000
<v Speaker 7>Drake Lennon. That is, has been sea level or worse

0:42:52.160 --> 0:42:56.040
<v Speaker 7>in almost every single Gay game. But it's the sixth

0:42:56.080 --> 0:43:00.000
<v Speaker 7>easiest matchup for wide receivers. Twenty three different wide receivers

0:43:00.160 --> 0:43:04.640
<v Speaker 7>have top fifty yards this season in twelve games. The

0:43:04.680 --> 0:43:08.000
<v Speaker 7>only other starting grade I have here is B. John Robinson.

0:43:08.040 --> 0:43:10.600
<v Speaker 7>Bucks have been top ten against running backs this year,

0:43:10.880 --> 0:43:13.040
<v Speaker 7>but have been bottom ten over the last three weeks,

0:43:13.040 --> 0:43:16.360
<v Speaker 7>allowing McCaffrey, JT and Chupa Hubbard to blow up on them.

0:43:17.400 --> 0:43:19.879
<v Speaker 7>High touch running backs have done really well against them.

0:43:19.960 --> 0:43:20.480
<v Speaker 4>B Grade.

0:43:20.560 --> 0:43:22.880
<v Speaker 7>There, I have Kyle Pitts on the bench. I have

0:43:22.920 --> 0:43:26.800
<v Speaker 7>Tyler Lger and Cordell Patterson, who are splitting now because

0:43:26.840 --> 0:43:28.600
<v Speaker 7>that's split, I have them on the bench as well.

0:43:29.800 --> 0:43:31.600
<v Speaker 3>That all makes sense, Scott, I think I see it

0:43:31.600 --> 0:43:33.440
<v Speaker 3>the same way. Fortunately, we're going to break, so we

0:43:33.440 --> 0:43:35.359
<v Speaker 3>won't get a Kyle Pit's rebuttal from Brian.

0:43:35.440 --> 0:43:36.520
<v Speaker 6>Now I'm biting my tongue.

0:43:36.680 --> 0:43:39.120
<v Speaker 4>No, when we come back long enough on purpose.

0:43:39.120 --> 0:43:42.160
<v Speaker 3>That's right. Three tough questions. See if you can go

0:43:42.200 --> 0:43:43.920
<v Speaker 3>three and oh with our panel of experts as we

0:43:44.000 --> 0:43:47.640
<v Speaker 3>dive into three of the most salient, difficult decisions that

0:43:47.680 --> 0:43:50.080
<v Speaker 3>we've all got to face coming down the stretch as

0:43:50.080 --> 0:43:59.200
<v Speaker 3>we head into the fantasy playoffs. Stay tuned Fantasy Football Weekly,

0:44:14.920 --> 0:44:17.920
<v Speaker 3>our number two Fantasy Football Weekly. Paul Jarchie and Scott

0:44:17.920 --> 0:44:20.759
<v Speaker 3>Fish and Brian Johnson with you. This is a game

0:44:20.800 --> 0:44:22.240
<v Speaker 3>we call three tough questions.

0:44:22.320 --> 0:44:25.799
<v Speaker 5>We begin with this tough question number one.

0:44:26.360 --> 0:44:29.920
<v Speaker 3>What is the appropriate level of concern for Patrick Mahomes?

0:44:30.400 --> 0:44:33.279
<v Speaker 3>Is it none? Is it some? Or is it a

0:44:33.360 --> 0:44:38.359
<v Speaker 3>bowel loosening level of existential dread? We begin with Scott Fish.

0:44:39.560 --> 0:44:41.080
<v Speaker 7>I think at this point, we got to go with some.

0:44:41.600 --> 0:44:44.879
<v Speaker 7>I don't think it's blowed. I think we've seen enough

0:44:44.920 --> 0:44:48.080
<v Speaker 7>of Mahomes over his career, not this you know, twelve

0:44:48.080 --> 0:44:53.280
<v Speaker 7>game sample size, that he's a pretty dang good quarterback.

0:44:53.920 --> 0:44:56.759
<v Speaker 7>But all season we keep thinking, oh, it's gonna be

0:44:56.800 --> 0:44:59.600
<v Speaker 7>scary once this offense gets things going, like the days

0:44:59.600 --> 0:45:03.040
<v Speaker 7>of all but it just keeps not happening. Maybe Airic

0:45:03.080 --> 0:45:05.319
<v Speaker 7>b Enemy leaving was a piece that hurt that more

0:45:05.360 --> 0:45:09.600
<v Speaker 7>than we thought. Concern exists, but I don't think we

0:45:09.640 --> 0:45:12.080
<v Speaker 7>should be like completely panicking on this.

0:45:13.160 --> 0:45:15.520
<v Speaker 3>All right, Brian, what's the appropriate level of concern for

0:45:15.600 --> 0:45:18.160
<v Speaker 3>Patrick Mahomes? Is it none? Is it some? Or is

0:45:18.160 --> 0:45:20.880
<v Speaker 3>it a bowel loosening level of existential dread?

0:45:21.239 --> 0:45:21.399
<v Speaker 5>Yeah?

0:45:21.440 --> 0:45:24.280
<v Speaker 6>I gotta agree with Scott that it's some because Mahomes

0:45:24.360 --> 0:45:26.319
<v Speaker 6>is just not a set it and forget it guy,

0:45:26.400 --> 0:45:29.000
<v Speaker 6>especially if you're still alive in a guillotine league. He's

0:45:29.120 --> 0:45:32.279
<v Speaker 6>almost like a depth player right now. I don't think

0:45:32.280 --> 0:45:34.520
<v Speaker 6>you can bench him this week against Buffalo, but looking

0:45:34.760 --> 0:45:37.560
<v Speaker 6>next week at New England, I don't know you might

0:45:37.600 --> 0:45:39.800
<v Speaker 6>have a better option than Patrick Mahomes. I like his

0:45:39.880 --> 0:45:43.399
<v Speaker 6>matchup in Week sixteen at home against Vegas a lot better.

0:45:43.400 --> 0:45:46.480
<v Speaker 6>But again, I mean he's almost a matchup dependent player

0:45:46.520 --> 0:45:49.480
<v Speaker 6>at this point. Not totally, but it's definitely some level

0:45:49.520 --> 0:45:50.560
<v Speaker 6>of concern for Mahomes.

0:45:50.560 --> 0:45:54.880
<v Speaker 3>For me, the correct answer is a bowel loosening level

0:45:55.040 --> 0:45:56.960
<v Speaker 3>of existential.

0:45:56.160 --> 0:45:58.400
<v Speaker 4>Oh my gosh, okay, it is.

0:45:58.480 --> 0:46:02.160
<v Speaker 3>Get this over the life last five weeks, Patrick Mahomes

0:46:02.520 --> 0:46:08.200
<v Speaker 3>is quarterback twenty one. That means almost certainly over the

0:46:08.280 --> 0:46:11.000
<v Speaker 3>last five weeks. To this is to Brian's point, over

0:46:11.040 --> 0:46:14.080
<v Speaker 3>the last five weeks, you probably would have been better

0:46:14.120 --> 0:46:18.520
<v Speaker 3>off starting whoever your other quarterback is than Patrick Mahomes.

0:46:18.920 --> 0:46:23.600
<v Speaker 3>Why where's the problem. The problem is the signature big plays.

0:46:23.920 --> 0:46:27.719
<v Speaker 3>When we think in the Mahomes era of long bomb passes,

0:46:28.640 --> 0:46:31.719
<v Speaker 3>the first guy you think of is Patrick Mahomes. He's

0:46:31.719 --> 0:46:35.480
<v Speaker 3>been so good there, but not this year. Get a

0:46:35.480 --> 0:46:41.200
<v Speaker 3>load of this. Mahomes quarterback thirty three in average depth

0:46:41.360 --> 0:46:45.959
<v Speaker 3>of target at seven point three yards, thirty third. He's

0:46:46.040 --> 0:46:51.640
<v Speaker 3>twentieth in deep ball completions. He's thirty second in deep

0:46:51.680 --> 0:46:56.920
<v Speaker 3>ball completion percentage. He's thirty sixth, dead last among qualified

0:46:56.960 --> 0:47:01.480
<v Speaker 3>quarterbacks in deep ball passer rating. Patrick Mahomes has one

0:47:01.560 --> 0:47:05.560
<v Speaker 3>touchdown this year of more than twenty yards. That's it,

0:47:06.080 --> 0:47:10.280
<v Speaker 3>and so much of what is gigantic explosive box scores

0:47:10.520 --> 0:47:13.640
<v Speaker 3>have come because of the forty to fifty sixty seventy

0:47:13.719 --> 0:47:17.640
<v Speaker 3>yard passes. Those have totally dried up. Can you snap

0:47:17.680 --> 0:47:20.720
<v Speaker 3>your fingers and suddenly get better at deep passing?

0:47:21.000 --> 0:47:23.319
<v Speaker 4>Not with his receiving core exactly.

0:47:23.560 --> 0:47:26.279
<v Speaker 3>I mean, Rashi Rice is the most promising receiver on

0:47:26.320 --> 0:47:29.040
<v Speaker 3>the depth chart, but he's not like bombs away deep

0:47:29.160 --> 0:47:34.320
<v Speaker 3>downfield guy. So I don't see this thing changing. And

0:47:34.480 --> 0:47:38.040
<v Speaker 3>we've got some stoppers on the on the schedule compared

0:47:38.080 --> 0:47:42.120
<v Speaker 3>to where we normally have Patrick Mahomes. Your level of

0:47:42.160 --> 0:47:45.320
<v Speaker 3>concern is a bowel loosening level of existential crept.

0:47:45.480 --> 0:47:48.560
<v Speaker 7>By the way, Rashi Rice is at four point seventy

0:47:48.600 --> 0:47:51.480
<v Speaker 7>five yards, He is not talking way way downfield.

0:47:51.560 --> 0:47:52.440
<v Speaker 3>Quite the opposite.

0:47:52.560 --> 0:47:55.200
<v Speaker 5>Yes, tough question number three.

0:47:55.520 --> 0:47:56.640
<v Speaker 4>Oops, let's try too.

0:47:56.760 --> 0:47:58.440
<v Speaker 5>Tough question number two.

0:47:59.080 --> 0:47:59.719
<v Speaker 6>Yeah you thought it.

0:48:00.000 --> 0:48:00.640
<v Speaker 3>I thought it was easy.

0:48:00.680 --> 0:48:02.319
<v Speaker 4>It's not easy this chair.

0:48:02.480 --> 0:48:05.800
<v Speaker 3>No, we're going backwards and it's doing your own matchup.

0:48:06.320 --> 0:48:06.600
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:48:06.760 --> 0:48:11.920
<v Speaker 3>I bet rest of season, Justin Jefferson will be a

0:48:11.960 --> 0:48:17.560
<v Speaker 3>wide receiver one, a wide receiver two, flex or bench player.

0:48:18.040 --> 0:48:19.640
<v Speaker 3>We begin with Brian for this one.

0:48:20.040 --> 0:48:23.799
<v Speaker 6>According to Fantasy Pros, the Vikings wide receivers have the

0:48:23.840 --> 0:48:27.200
<v Speaker 6>fourth hardest remaining strength of schedule. But looking at their schedule,

0:48:27.200 --> 0:48:30.920
<v Speaker 6>it's at Las Vegas, as you know, charge at Cincinnati

0:48:31.120 --> 0:48:34.440
<v Speaker 6>versus Detroit, then versus Green Bay. I don't see that

0:48:34.480 --> 0:48:37.440
<v Speaker 6>as the fourth artist. Yeah, I disagree.

0:48:37.480 --> 0:48:40.520
<v Speaker 3>There another site, another site I like rodal Wire has

0:48:40.520 --> 0:48:41.600
<v Speaker 3>the fourth easiest.

0:48:41.920 --> 0:48:45.000
<v Speaker 6>All right, So there's some major discrepancy here. But the

0:48:45.000 --> 0:48:48.600
<v Speaker 6>major concern is it's the quarterback position for the Vikings

0:48:48.600 --> 0:48:50.680
<v Speaker 6>that they're sticking with Joshua Dobbs right now, which I

0:48:50.680 --> 0:48:53.239
<v Speaker 6>think is the right call. But whoever is starting a

0:48:53.320 --> 0:48:56.760
<v Speaker 6>quarterback is an obvious downgrade from Kirk Cousins. We don't

0:48:56.800 --> 0:48:59.920
<v Speaker 6>know if Jefferson's at one hundred percent, but he's probably

0:49:00.000 --> 0:49:02.480
<v Speaker 6>pretty darn close. But you got to play a little

0:49:02.480 --> 0:49:05.080
<v Speaker 6>safe and go with just wide receiver two. It's not

0:49:05.120 --> 0:49:07.359
<v Speaker 6>about Jefferson, it's about his quarterback for me.

0:49:09.920 --> 0:49:12.920
<v Speaker 3>Okay Scott, rest of season, justin Jefferson. Will he be

0:49:12.960 --> 0:49:16.400
<v Speaker 3>a wide receiver one, wide receiver two, flex or bench?

0:49:17.200 --> 0:49:17.439
<v Speaker 4>Yeah?

0:49:17.520 --> 0:49:19.520
<v Speaker 7>I think he goes right back to wide receiver one,

0:49:19.680 --> 0:49:22.520
<v Speaker 7>And I feel like the bar isn't isn't as high

0:49:22.560 --> 0:49:26.799
<v Speaker 7>as maybe he's not Justin Jefferson wide receiver one overall

0:49:26.920 --> 0:49:30.239
<v Speaker 7>or two overall like Dyrek Gel, But I feel like

0:49:30.320 --> 0:49:34.000
<v Speaker 7>he's going to get the target volume that Kevin O'Connell

0:49:34.120 --> 0:49:38.520
<v Speaker 7>is going to scheme plays specifically to make him work

0:49:38.640 --> 0:49:43.239
<v Speaker 7>with Josh Dobbs. I think finding his way to a

0:49:43.320 --> 0:49:45.359
<v Speaker 7>top twelve wide receiver for the rest of the season

0:49:45.520 --> 0:49:46.760
<v Speaker 7>is not going to be that difficult.

0:49:51.760 --> 0:49:54.840
<v Speaker 3>Schedule is very favorable. I think no stoppers left. Cincinnati

0:49:55.040 --> 0:49:58.680
<v Speaker 3>and Detroit in particular, very positive matchups for Justin Jefferson.

0:49:58.760 --> 0:50:01.680
<v Speaker 3>Kevin O'Connell's offense is designed to go through Jefferson, and

0:50:01.760 --> 0:50:04.000
<v Speaker 3>Lord knows, the running game is not going to displace

0:50:04.600 --> 0:50:08.920
<v Speaker 3>Justin Jefferson from this offense. And remember Minnesota ranks third

0:50:09.000 --> 0:50:12.600
<v Speaker 3>in pass attempts, fourth and passing play percentage. This is

0:50:12.640 --> 0:50:15.160
<v Speaker 3>a pass first offense and he's the best receiver on

0:50:15.200 --> 0:50:17.759
<v Speaker 3>the team. Kevin O'Connell's going to go down swinging with

0:50:17.760 --> 0:50:21.680
<v Speaker 3>his best weapons, Justin Jefferson and TJ. Hockinson this season.

0:50:21.960 --> 0:50:26.120
<v Speaker 3>The quarterback situation obviously not ideal, and that takes him

0:50:26.120 --> 0:50:28.840
<v Speaker 3>out of the ranks of like Ceedee Lamb aj Brown,

0:50:28.920 --> 0:50:32.960
<v Speaker 3>Tyreek Hill, and other clear like elite wide receiver ones.

0:50:33.200 --> 0:50:36.120
<v Speaker 3>But he's really in the next tier of guys, which

0:50:36.160 --> 0:50:38.360
<v Speaker 3>still puts him into wide receiver one territory where he

0:50:38.440 --> 0:50:41.000
<v Speaker 3>might come in as like the eighth, ninth, tenth, eleven, twelfth,

0:50:41.280 --> 0:50:44.520
<v Speaker 3>best wide receiver on the season. That's still wide receiver

0:50:44.600 --> 0:50:53.000
<v Speaker 3>one territory. Oh, Scott, let's go to tough question number three.

0:50:53.200 --> 0:50:56.719
<v Speaker 3>There we go, all right, Tank Dell is out for

0:50:56.760 --> 0:51:01.600
<v Speaker 3>the year for rest of the season, Nicocollins, Is he

0:51:01.880 --> 0:51:05.240
<v Speaker 3>a wide receiver one, wide receiver two, flex or bench?

0:51:06.080 --> 0:51:06.279
<v Speaker 5>Yeah?

0:51:06.360 --> 0:51:08.600
<v Speaker 7>I still have him also a wide receiver one. He

0:51:08.719 --> 0:51:13.120
<v Speaker 7>was really really hyper targeted, even going up against Patzertayne

0:51:13.160 --> 0:51:18.160
<v Speaker 7>last week after Tank Dell went down. Noel Brown obviously

0:51:18.160 --> 0:51:20.400
<v Speaker 7>not one hundred percent healthy yet, but he should should go.

0:51:20.920 --> 0:51:24.160
<v Speaker 7>Tough matchup this week though, tough matchup facing Sauce Gardner

0:51:24.200 --> 0:51:27.000
<v Speaker 7>and DJ Reid on the outsides this week, but most

0:51:27.040 --> 0:51:28.719
<v Speaker 7>of the games going forward he's going to be a

0:51:28.719 --> 0:51:31.080
<v Speaker 7>wide receiver one. I'm not even opposed to saying he

0:51:31.120 --> 0:51:33.520
<v Speaker 7>could get there this week with how much he got targeted.

0:51:33.560 --> 0:51:36.719
<v Speaker 7>Outside of that, his one game without Dell was four

0:51:36.760 --> 0:51:40.040
<v Speaker 7>for eighty yards. And he did that up against Marshawn Lattimore.

0:51:40.600 --> 0:51:42.560
<v Speaker 7>It really would have been nice to see some games

0:51:42.600 --> 0:51:44.799
<v Speaker 7>with all of these guys healthy, to be honest, that

0:51:44.840 --> 0:51:47.560
<v Speaker 7>would have been great. But I still have him as

0:51:47.600 --> 0:51:49.400
<v Speaker 7>a low end wide receiver one going.

0:51:49.200 --> 0:51:54.040
<v Speaker 3>Forward, Okay, Brian. With Tank Dell out for the year,

0:51:54.680 --> 0:51:57.560
<v Speaker 3>Nico Collins rest of season? Is he a wide receiver,

0:51:57.640 --> 0:51:59.720
<v Speaker 3>one wide receiver, two flex or bench?

0:52:00.400 --> 0:52:04.319
<v Speaker 6>So this season, before Dell went down, on snaps that

0:52:04.400 --> 0:52:07.240
<v Speaker 6>Collins played when Dell wasn't on the field for whatever reason,

0:52:07.520 --> 0:52:10.680
<v Speaker 6>Collins target share climbed from twenty percent to thirty one

0:52:10.760 --> 0:52:13.520
<v Speaker 6>percent and his air yard share went from twenty five

0:52:13.560 --> 0:52:16.440
<v Speaker 6>percent to forty one percent. So when Dell wasn't on

0:52:16.480 --> 0:52:19.560
<v Speaker 6>the field, Collins was CJ. Stroud's favorite target and that's

0:52:19.560 --> 0:52:21.720
<v Speaker 6>going to be the case for the remainder of the season.

0:52:21.760 --> 0:52:23.960
<v Speaker 6>I got to disagree with Scott a little bit in

0:52:24.000 --> 0:52:26.040
<v Speaker 6>that we're an agreement that it's a bad matchup against

0:52:26.080 --> 0:52:28.839
<v Speaker 6>the Jets this week. We're going to break that down momentarily,

0:52:29.080 --> 0:52:31.160
<v Speaker 6>so I would give him a C. But then tennessee

0:52:31.200 --> 0:52:34.040
<v Speaker 6>a good matchup, but then they have Cleveland in Week sixteen.

0:52:34.080 --> 0:52:36.840
<v Speaker 6>That feels like another seed to me and then Tennessee again,

0:52:37.400 --> 0:52:39.279
<v Speaker 6>and the Tennessee matchups are kind of an A so

0:52:39.560 --> 0:52:42.680
<v Speaker 6>ca CAA that averages out to a B to me.

0:52:42.760 --> 0:52:46.320
<v Speaker 6>So I'm at wide receiver, wide receiver two cock cock.

0:52:46.120 --> 0:52:50.160
<v Speaker 3>Cocky, don't talk about one of our favorite receivers that way, right.

0:52:51.800 --> 0:52:55.920
<v Speaker 3>Nico is fourth in yards after catch, and that helps

0:52:56.160 --> 0:53:00.360
<v Speaker 3>him turn low volume games into high yardage games because

0:53:00.400 --> 0:53:02.560
<v Speaker 3>even if he doesn't get the ball a lot, because

0:53:02.560 --> 0:53:05.720
<v Speaker 3>he can do so well after the catch, he can

0:53:06.000 --> 0:53:08.480
<v Speaker 3>have big he can have big output. And even with

0:53:08.560 --> 0:53:11.719
<v Speaker 3>the monus uptick and targets like let's say two per game,

0:53:12.000 --> 0:53:14.760
<v Speaker 3>if he gets two extra targets per game with Dell out,

0:53:15.080 --> 0:53:17.680
<v Speaker 3>that would be huge for Collins. Listen to this differential.

0:53:18.719 --> 0:53:21.560
<v Speaker 3>For Collins' average games where he gets six or fewer

0:53:21.600 --> 0:53:27.520
<v Speaker 3>targets very mundane forty seven yards point two touchdowns per game.

0:53:27.920 --> 0:53:30.800
<v Speaker 3>But when he gets seven or more targets, Nico Collins

0:53:30.840 --> 0:53:34.920
<v Speaker 3>explodes up to one hundred and twenty five yards and

0:53:35.040 --> 0:53:38.760
<v Speaker 3>almost a full touchdown per game. So he's like double

0:53:38.840 --> 0:53:42.560
<v Speaker 3>or triple the efficacy when he gets seven or more targets.

0:53:42.920 --> 0:53:45.279
<v Speaker 3>And I think without Dell he's likely to get those

0:53:45.280 --> 0:53:48.560
<v Speaker 3>seven targets and virtually every game down the stretch. And

0:53:48.560 --> 0:53:50.080
<v Speaker 3>if you're wondering how good one hundred and twenty five

0:53:50.120 --> 0:53:52.360
<v Speaker 3>yards and point eight touchdowns is, that's almost exactly what

0:53:52.400 --> 0:53:55.480
<v Speaker 3>Tyrik kill is giving his fantasy owners right now. So

0:53:55.520 --> 0:53:59.080
<v Speaker 3>you're getting the best wide receiver in football in those

0:53:59.120 --> 0:54:02.240
<v Speaker 3>games or gets seven one targets. Now, it's not always

0:54:02.280 --> 0:54:05.120
<v Speaker 3>as simple as saying, well, because Tank Dell's gone, that

0:54:05.160 --> 0:54:08.000
<v Speaker 3>means he's gonna get more targets, but he probably will.

0:54:08.040 --> 0:54:11.320
<v Speaker 3>He'll also get better coverage with Tank Dell out because

0:54:11.520 --> 0:54:14.120
<v Speaker 3>defenses don't have to account for Tank Dell. And Robert

0:54:14.160 --> 0:54:16.040
<v Speaker 3>Woods is not as good or Noah Brown is not

0:54:16.120 --> 0:54:20.000
<v Speaker 3>as good. Still, I love the post prospects of him

0:54:20.040 --> 0:54:22.479
<v Speaker 3>being a high volume player, and I think you could

0:54:22.480 --> 0:54:24.800
<v Speaker 3>do well here. The matchups do concern me, and I

0:54:24.840 --> 0:54:27.040
<v Speaker 3>think Brian really hit on a key thing. Jets and

0:54:27.080 --> 0:54:31.040
<v Speaker 3>Cleveland could be major bombers for you know, any wide receiver.

0:54:31.719 --> 0:54:33.759
<v Speaker 3>And because of that, you know, that's that's half of

0:54:33.800 --> 0:54:37.080
<v Speaker 3>the remaining schedule, Jets Cleveland, So I can only get

0:54:37.080 --> 0:54:39.239
<v Speaker 3>to wide receiver two. If it were if it were

0:54:39.239 --> 0:54:41.520
<v Speaker 3>pretty much any other defenses you were facing. I think

0:54:41.520 --> 0:54:43.080
<v Speaker 3>he'd be wide receiver one for sure.

0:54:43.200 --> 0:54:45.160
<v Speaker 7>It's not good to know who has faith in Nico

0:54:45.200 --> 0:54:47.959
<v Speaker 7>Collins and who doesn't, who truly believes.

0:54:47.600 --> 0:54:49.440
<v Speaker 3>I am Yeah, long time listeners.

0:54:49.480 --> 0:54:52.080
<v Speaker 6>No, right, yes, we're starting them either way.

0:54:52.880 --> 0:54:55.200
<v Speaker 3>Let's go to Houston taking on the Jets. It's a

0:54:55.200 --> 0:54:58.239
<v Speaker 3>perfect segue. Brian, you mentioned already you've got a C

0:54:58.440 --> 0:55:00.680
<v Speaker 3>grade on Nico Collins. You want to that at all?

0:55:00.760 --> 0:55:02.760
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, not a great matchup, but I will mention quickly.

0:55:02.920 --> 0:55:06.120
<v Speaker 6>Torrential downpour expected in New Jersey on Sunday. That's not

0:55:06.160 --> 0:55:08.600
<v Speaker 6>a stopper by any means, but rain does factor into

0:55:08.600 --> 0:55:10.520
<v Speaker 6>the passing game. So just to see on Collins, but

0:55:10.520 --> 0:55:13.319
<v Speaker 6>it's more about the matchup. Awful matchup. Jets allowing the

0:55:13.360 --> 0:55:16.359
<v Speaker 6>second fewest catches per game to wide receivers just nine

0:55:16.400 --> 0:55:19.719
<v Speaker 6>point five as a whole, and the fewest yards and

0:55:19.880 --> 0:55:23.280
<v Speaker 6>touchdowns per game. New York has allowed three wide receiver

0:55:23.360 --> 0:55:25.000
<v Speaker 6>touchdowns all season three.

0:55:25.560 --> 0:55:26.000
<v Speaker 5>That's it.

0:55:26.040 --> 0:55:29.920
<v Speaker 6>So see for Collins, Noah Brown, John metchiw Robert Woods,

0:55:29.920 --> 0:55:31.640
<v Speaker 6>they're all on the bench. But I like the matchup

0:55:31.680 --> 0:55:33.960
<v Speaker 6>for Brevin Jordan at tight end. He was might take

0:55:33.960 --> 0:55:36.960
<v Speaker 6>a chance on me receiver, So a C grade for

0:55:37.120 --> 0:55:40.319
<v Speaker 6>Jordan and CJ. Stroud. I was close to putting him

0:55:40.360 --> 0:55:42.640
<v Speaker 6>on the bench, but I just couldn't do it. But

0:55:42.760 --> 0:55:45.359
<v Speaker 6>just to see for him. The Jets are allowing one

0:55:45.480 --> 0:55:47.719
<v Speaker 6>hundred and ninety two passing yards and one point two

0:55:48.280 --> 0:55:50.640
<v Speaker 6>passing touchdowns per game. That is not good at all.

0:55:50.640 --> 0:55:53.520
<v Speaker 6>But Stroud has been excellent this season. I think he

0:55:53.560 --> 0:55:56.640
<v Speaker 6>can find his way to at least two touchdown passes hopefully,

0:55:56.960 --> 0:55:59.960
<v Speaker 6>so a C grade for him. Charge Damian Pierce was

0:56:00.160 --> 0:56:02.399
<v Speaker 6>take a chance on me running back. I like him

0:56:02.440 --> 0:56:05.399
<v Speaker 6>more than Devin Singletary. As you mentioned in the take

0:56:05.440 --> 0:56:08.080
<v Speaker 6>on segment, is a great matchup for the running backs

0:56:08.080 --> 0:56:10.400
<v Speaker 6>on paper, but Pierce trending towards the lead back so

0:56:10.440 --> 0:56:13.520
<v Speaker 6>he gets the stronger see between the backs for Houston.

0:56:14.000 --> 0:56:14.440
<v Speaker 5>Over to the.

0:56:14.480 --> 0:56:17.000
<v Speaker 6>Jets side, I got a few c's here, starting with

0:56:17.080 --> 0:56:20.400
<v Speaker 6>Breece Hall dealing with an ankle injury but is expected

0:56:20.400 --> 0:56:22.560
<v Speaker 6>to play. Not a great match up here though for

0:56:22.640 --> 0:56:25.279
<v Speaker 6>Breece A posting backs or averaging one hundred and eleven

0:56:25.320 --> 0:56:28.560
<v Speaker 6>combo yards per game against Houston not great, not awful,

0:56:28.840 --> 0:56:32.240
<v Speaker 6>but no loan back has topped ninety rushing yards against

0:56:32.280 --> 0:56:35.000
<v Speaker 6>the Texans this season. And the Texans haven't surrendered a

0:56:35.080 --> 0:56:38.280
<v Speaker 6>running back touchdown since Week ten. So just to see

0:56:38.280 --> 0:56:41.480
<v Speaker 6>for Breese Hall, also a see for Garrett Wilson. The

0:56:41.560 --> 0:56:44.040
<v Speaker 6>Texans are allowing more than one hundred and sixty yards

0:56:44.040 --> 0:56:47.200
<v Speaker 6>per game to wide receivers, and Garrett Wilson's target share

0:56:47.320 --> 0:56:50.279
<v Speaker 6>is pushing thirty percent, which is a lot. So you

0:56:50.280 --> 0:56:52.719
<v Speaker 6>got to like that volume. Even though we've hated the

0:56:52.760 --> 0:56:56.600
<v Speaker 6>quarterbacks for the Jets all year since Aaron Rodgers went

0:56:56.680 --> 0:57:01.040
<v Speaker 6>down so real quickly. Zach Wilson is on the bench obviously,

0:57:01.200 --> 0:57:04.200
<v Speaker 6>but Tyler Conklin is not. Even with Wilson under center.

0:57:04.239 --> 0:57:06.840
<v Speaker 6>I mean, Wilson is an upgrade over Tim Boyle. I

0:57:06.880 --> 0:57:08.880
<v Speaker 6>guess you you can give him back, but yeah, I

0:57:08.920 --> 0:57:11.239
<v Speaker 6>gotta see on Conklin. The Texans are allowing more than

0:57:11.680 --> 0:57:14.440
<v Speaker 6>six and a half catches and sixty receiving yards per

0:57:14.520 --> 0:57:17.360
<v Speaker 6>game to tight ends, and Houston is one of two

0:57:17.400 --> 0:57:20.840
<v Speaker 6>teams to yield more than one hundred targets to tight

0:57:20.960 --> 0:57:23.240
<v Speaker 6>ends so far this season. So I like Conklin here

0:57:23.400 --> 0:57:24.720
<v Speaker 6>in the wasteland with a sea.

0:57:25.560 --> 0:57:29.680
<v Speaker 3>All right, when we come back Minnesota taking on Las Vegas,

0:57:29.800 --> 0:57:32.320
<v Speaker 3>we'll give you details on what to expect from Justin

0:57:32.520 --> 0:57:38.000
<v Speaker 3>Jefferson in his first game in nine weeks. Nine weeks, Oh,

0:57:38.040 --> 0:57:41.880
<v Speaker 3>it's been way too long. Do you automatically put Justin

0:57:41.920 --> 0:57:44.560
<v Speaker 3>Jefferson back in your lineup? Find out when we come

0:57:44.600 --> 0:58:14.040
<v Speaker 3>back to Fantasy Football Week. Welcome back, Fantasy Football Weekly

0:58:14.160 --> 0:58:19.320
<v Speaker 3>Vikings take on the Raiders Justin Jefferson back prior to

0:58:19.360 --> 0:58:22.120
<v Speaker 3>his injury. You may have forgotten just how good Justin

0:58:22.200 --> 0:58:27.520
<v Speaker 3>Jefferson was average game prior to injury eight catches, one

0:58:27.600 --> 0:58:31.160
<v Speaker 3>hundred and thirty six yards per game. Not going to

0:58:31.200 --> 0:58:33.880
<v Speaker 3>do that with Josh Dobbs, but still a very good

0:58:33.920 --> 0:58:36.920
<v Speaker 3>opportunity here. Over the last five weeks, Las Vegas has

0:58:36.960 --> 0:58:40.480
<v Speaker 3>allowed the fifth most receptions per game to opposing wide receivers.

0:58:40.480 --> 0:58:44.040
<v Speaker 3>They've shaken up their secondary. They're now starting former New

0:58:44.080 --> 0:58:47.320
<v Speaker 3>England cornerback Jack Jones, who was waived outright and they

0:58:47.360 --> 0:58:51.360
<v Speaker 3>cut Marcus Peters. This will be the first game with Jones,

0:58:51.720 --> 0:58:54.720
<v Speaker 3>who was just awful with the Patriots. So there's a

0:58:54.760 --> 0:58:59.280
<v Speaker 3>great opportunity for Jefferson here. Now opposite Jones is Amik Robertson.

0:58:59.360 --> 0:59:01.640
<v Speaker 3>They might have him shadow Jefferson, which would make a

0:59:01.640 --> 0:59:04.600
<v Speaker 3>ton of sense. And even still I mean, Robinson's good,

0:59:04.600 --> 0:59:07.280
<v Speaker 3>but he's not great, and that's a nice opportunity for

0:59:07.400 --> 0:59:10.280
<v Speaker 3>Justin Jefferson. A grade on him. A grade on TJ.

0:59:10.360 --> 0:59:13.040
<v Speaker 3>Hockinson as well. You know, a reminder, even when Justin

0:59:13.120 --> 0:59:15.800
<v Speaker 3>Jefferson was going, Hockinson getting tons of looks and that's

0:59:15.800 --> 0:59:19.520
<v Speaker 3>continued NonStop, and Josh Dubb Dobbs loves his tight ends.

0:59:19.800 --> 0:59:23.640
<v Speaker 3>Hockinson needed last week's by to get rest at rib

0:59:23.680 --> 0:59:27.120
<v Speaker 3>injury that was really laboring on him. Las Vegas middle

0:59:27.120 --> 0:59:28.800
<v Speaker 3>of the pack and all the stats against tight ends

0:59:28.840 --> 0:59:31.680
<v Speaker 3>doesn't matter. Hockinson A grade for this one, not to

0:59:31.680 --> 0:59:36.400
<v Speaker 3>mention it. Josh passing game Jordan Addison. Jefferson siphons off

0:59:36.400 --> 0:59:38.080
<v Speaker 3>a lot of balls, but he also draws a lot

0:59:38.080 --> 0:59:41.520
<v Speaker 3>of coverage, so Addison's going to likely see fewer passes,

0:59:41.560 --> 0:59:45.080
<v Speaker 3>but hopefully better opportunities and maybe one won't clank off

0:59:45.080 --> 0:59:48.880
<v Speaker 3>his face mask like last game. If the Raiders do

0:59:49.040 --> 0:59:51.600
<v Speaker 3>decide to put a Meet Robertson on Jefferson, that would

0:59:51.600 --> 0:59:53.840
<v Speaker 3>put Jack Jones on Addison and that's a great matchup.

0:59:54.080 --> 0:59:57.200
<v Speaker 3>So there's an opportunity here. Jones allowing an eighty percent

0:59:57.280 --> 1:00:01.280
<v Speaker 3>catch rate. High risk hy rewards start C grade. Jordan Addison,

1:00:01.760 --> 1:00:05.280
<v Speaker 3>and let's talk Josh Dobbs. This is an ultra high risk,

1:00:05.400 --> 1:00:09.600
<v Speaker 3>high rewards spot for Josh Dobbs. He could be benched

1:00:09.640 --> 1:00:11.800
<v Speaker 3>if he continues to turn the ball over. That would

1:00:11.800 --> 1:00:14.000
<v Speaker 3>be your downside scenarios you don't get a full game

1:00:14.040 --> 1:00:16.920
<v Speaker 3>from him. Or he could be electric. With Justin Jefferson back,

1:00:16.960 --> 1:00:19.600
<v Speaker 3>he could run in a score. You know, mostly the

1:00:19.680 --> 1:00:24.760
<v Speaker 3>Raider secondary has handled middling passers like Dobbs, but with

1:00:24.800 --> 1:00:27.680
<v Speaker 3>his rushing and the plethora of strong targets here, I

1:00:27.680 --> 1:00:30.120
<v Speaker 3>think he's a plausible starter for those with the appetite.

1:00:30.160 --> 1:00:33.320
<v Speaker 3>I give him a C grade. Can't give you a

1:00:33.400 --> 1:00:36.640
<v Speaker 3>letter grade on this running game again. Alexander Madison on

1:00:36.680 --> 1:00:40.560
<v Speaker 3>the bench since Week five. He's top fifty two rushing

1:00:40.680 --> 1:00:44.560
<v Speaker 3>yards one time, and he came against the Broncos and

1:00:44.600 --> 1:00:46.600
<v Speaker 3>they give up the most rushing yards in the league.

1:00:47.120 --> 1:00:49.920
<v Speaker 3>Madison has seen ten or fewer carries in four of

1:00:49.960 --> 1:00:53.720
<v Speaker 3>the last eight games unshackled from Josh McDaniels. The Raiders

1:00:53.760 --> 1:00:56.400
<v Speaker 3>are much better run defense. They're giving up just seventy

1:00:56.440 --> 1:00:59.200
<v Speaker 3>six rushing yards per game and three point eight yards

1:00:59.240 --> 1:01:02.240
<v Speaker 3>per carry over the past five weeks without Josh McDaniels,

1:01:02.240 --> 1:01:06.080
<v Speaker 3>So bench grade on Alexander Madison in this one. Let's

1:01:06.120 --> 1:01:08.640
<v Speaker 3>go to the Las Vegas side. You really only care

1:01:08.720 --> 1:01:11.479
<v Speaker 3>about a couple of guys. We'll hit on them now.

1:01:11.560 --> 1:01:15.600
<v Speaker 3>Josh Jacobs B grade. Since Aidan O'Connell took over in

1:01:15.600 --> 1:01:19.080
<v Speaker 3>Week nine, Jacob's getting a lot of work. Twenty four touches,

1:01:19.200 --> 1:01:23.520
<v Speaker 3>one hundred total yards and point eight scores per game. Vikings,

1:01:23.520 --> 1:01:25.840
<v Speaker 3>though very good run defense as they have been most

1:01:25.840 --> 1:01:28.760
<v Speaker 3>of the season, they allowed the third fewest touchdowns per

1:01:28.760 --> 1:01:31.600
<v Speaker 3>game to opposing running backs, only point four per game.

1:01:31.880 --> 1:01:34.800
<v Speaker 3>The Vikings allow the fifth fewest total yards per game

1:01:34.840 --> 1:01:37.680
<v Speaker 3>to opposing running backs as well. All that, you know,

1:01:37.760 --> 1:01:39.840
<v Speaker 3>all the it's one hundred and three per game total.

1:01:39.880 --> 1:01:41.919
<v Speaker 3>All that should go to Jacobs, who's seen at least

1:01:41.920 --> 1:01:45.160
<v Speaker 3>seventy five percent of the snaps in five straight weeks.

1:01:45.160 --> 1:01:48.200
<v Speaker 3>So true workhorse back in Josh Jacobs. So even in

1:01:48.240 --> 1:01:50.400
<v Speaker 3>a tough matchup is a good run defense, he comes

1:01:50.440 --> 1:01:54.080
<v Speaker 3>in with a B grade. You care about. DeVante Adams

1:01:54.560 --> 1:01:57.160
<v Speaker 3>hasn't been the game breaker we're used to, but still

1:01:57.200 --> 1:01:59.920
<v Speaker 3>providing a solid floor. With Aidan O'Connell at the he

1:02:00.080 --> 1:02:03.479
<v Speaker 3>home averaging six catches eighty four yards while scoring once

1:02:03.520 --> 1:02:06.240
<v Speaker 3>in the last three games. The Vikings secondary gives up

1:02:06.280 --> 1:02:10.240
<v Speaker 3>over fourteen receptions per game to wideouts, that is fourth

1:02:10.320 --> 1:02:13.240
<v Speaker 3>most well giving up the tenth most yards per game

1:02:13.280 --> 1:02:15.720
<v Speaker 3>to the position. So I still think Adams is a

1:02:15.840 --> 1:02:18.320
<v Speaker 3>very safe start here. Vikings don't give up a lot

1:02:18.320 --> 1:02:20.600
<v Speaker 3>of scores to wideouts, just half a touchdown per game

1:02:20.640 --> 1:02:24.560
<v Speaker 3>since September. Solid, but probably not an explosive game coming

1:02:24.560 --> 1:02:26.440
<v Speaker 3>for DeVonta Adams, who comes in with a B grade.

1:02:26.520 --> 1:02:29.440
<v Speaker 6>Really yeah, sorry, I had to look. I know this

1:02:29.440 --> 1:02:32.640
<v Speaker 6>is the Packers. This is adams history against the Vikings

1:02:32.640 --> 1:02:36.600
<v Speaker 6>with Green Bay touchdown wise one, two, three two. It's

1:02:36.640 --> 1:02:38.080
<v Speaker 6>the last four games against the Lakes.

1:02:38.120 --> 1:02:38.400
<v Speaker 5>Wow.

1:02:38.800 --> 1:02:39.920
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, he likes playing them.

1:02:40.360 --> 1:02:44.000
<v Speaker 3>Jacoby Meyers also a plausible start here, coming off his

1:02:44.120 --> 1:02:47.800
<v Speaker 3>best game with Aidan O'Connell a quarterback last week. Six catches,

1:02:47.840 --> 1:02:51.120
<v Speaker 3>seventy nine yards and a touchdown. Vikings allowing one hundred

1:02:51.120 --> 1:02:53.920
<v Speaker 3>and eighty one passing yards per game in a way games,

1:02:53.920 --> 1:02:58.040
<v Speaker 3>which is very low, and it's about eighty yards less

1:02:58.040 --> 1:03:00.360
<v Speaker 3>than they give up at home. Myers has twelve red

1:03:00.400 --> 1:03:02.360
<v Speaker 3>zone targets, which is solid, and they do like to

1:03:02.440 --> 1:03:05.040
<v Speaker 3>use him near the stripe. I can see a plausible

1:03:05.040 --> 1:03:07.600
<v Speaker 3>spot here for Jacoby Myers, but I don't expect greatness

1:03:07.680 --> 1:03:09.720
<v Speaker 3>C grade for him. Ain't no Caddle's on the bench.

1:03:10.800 --> 1:03:13.440
<v Speaker 3>I don't know that you'd be replacing anybody for him anyway.

1:03:13.480 --> 1:03:16.720
<v Speaker 3>Here Vikings have allowed zero or one touchdown pass in

1:03:16.840 --> 1:03:20.560
<v Speaker 3>eight of the last nine games. Let's go to Denver

1:03:20.640 --> 1:03:23.960
<v Speaker 3>taking on the Chargers. Scott, I already told you I

1:03:24.000 --> 1:03:27.200
<v Speaker 3>like Russell Wilson to take a chance on me a quarterback.

1:03:27.520 --> 1:03:30.040
<v Speaker 3>What do you think of his receiving options in this game?

1:03:30.160 --> 1:03:32.200
<v Speaker 7>I agree with you on Russell Wilson. I had a

1:03:32.240 --> 1:03:34.040
<v Speaker 7>B grade on him, which means I got a couple

1:03:34.040 --> 1:03:35.960
<v Speaker 7>of receivers I like in this game. I have a

1:03:36.000 --> 1:03:38.760
<v Speaker 7>B grade on Courtland Sutton and a C grade on

1:03:39.200 --> 1:03:43.520
<v Speaker 7>Jerry Judy. Chargers bottom three against wide receivers, fifth, most

1:03:43.560 --> 1:03:47.800
<v Speaker 7>yards allowed, sixth most touchdowns allowed. Judy himself only one

1:03:47.880 --> 1:03:51.040
<v Speaker 7>game over sixty five yards and only one touchdown on

1:03:51.080 --> 1:03:54.000
<v Speaker 7>the year. So the best, even in a great matchup

1:03:54.400 --> 1:03:56.360
<v Speaker 7>with a quarterback matchup that's great.

1:03:56.640 --> 1:03:57.720
<v Speaker 4>The best I can.

1:03:57.560 --> 1:03:59.800
<v Speaker 7>Do for him is a C grade, hoping he does

1:04:00.200 --> 1:04:03.520
<v Speaker 7>those like three for sixty five four for sixty five,

1:04:03.640 --> 1:04:07.880
<v Speaker 7>just barely edges double digit touch, double digit fantasy points.

1:04:08.160 --> 1:04:10.720
<v Speaker 7>I do have a B grade on Sutton, though. Take

1:04:10.760 --> 1:04:13.760
<v Speaker 7>away the scores and he's only averaging four catches for

1:04:13.840 --> 1:04:17.640
<v Speaker 7>fifty one yards, but that's still a just barely C level.

1:04:17.880 --> 1:04:19.080
<v Speaker 4>But he scores all the time.

1:04:19.400 --> 1:04:22.240
<v Speaker 7>Forty seven percent of the team's end zone targets six

1:04:22.480 --> 1:04:26.280
<v Speaker 7>scores in the last seven games. He probably needs the score,

1:04:26.320 --> 1:04:28.320
<v Speaker 7>but I think he gets it here in this matchup.

1:04:28.440 --> 1:04:33.040
<v Speaker 7>So B grade B grade on Courtland Sutton running game.

1:04:33.200 --> 1:04:36.640
<v Speaker 7>I only have a B grade on Javonte Williams, Jalil McLoughlin,

1:04:36.760 --> 1:04:39.640
<v Speaker 7>and Samandrea p Ryan now seem to be splitting. It

1:04:39.720 --> 1:04:41.720
<v Speaker 7>was a mcglofflin game last week, it was a p

1:04:41.880 --> 1:04:44.120
<v Speaker 7>Ryn game the week before. It's it seems like it's

1:04:44.200 --> 1:04:47.440
<v Speaker 7>enough of a split to annoy fantasy owners that you

1:04:47.480 --> 1:04:50.640
<v Speaker 7>can't start them. You can only start Davonte. He's getting

1:04:50.680 --> 1:04:54.400
<v Speaker 7>a B grade, averaging over twenty touches for eighty three

1:04:54.560 --> 1:04:57.760
<v Speaker 7>yards since returning to the lead back role, is getting

1:04:57.800 --> 1:05:00.120
<v Speaker 7>a few catches a game as well. He's only I

1:05:00.160 --> 1:05:04.760
<v Speaker 7>scored twice in those six weeks. But the Chargers, they're

1:05:04.760 --> 1:05:09.480
<v Speaker 7>eleventh Thesiast against runners seventeen plus touch backs like Javonte

1:05:09.560 --> 1:05:12.240
<v Speaker 7>Williams is are averaging about ninety five total yards. I'm

1:05:12.240 --> 1:05:15.360
<v Speaker 7>giving him a B here. Over to the Chargers side,

1:05:15.680 --> 1:05:19.800
<v Speaker 7>I have a C grade on Justin Herbert, who, like Minshew,

1:05:19.880 --> 1:05:21.880
<v Speaker 7>almost seems like you have to pick your spots this

1:05:21.920 --> 1:05:25.440
<v Speaker 7>weird year, which is really weird for Justin Herbert. But

1:05:25.840 --> 1:05:28.400
<v Speaker 7>Broncos were terrible against the past to start the year,

1:05:28.480 --> 1:05:33.439
<v Speaker 7>only one multi passing pass only one multi passing touchdown game.

1:05:33.640 --> 1:05:36.200
<v Speaker 7>But over the last five weeks and over the last

1:05:36.240 --> 1:05:38.480
<v Speaker 7>five weeks, they held Mahomes to two hundred and forty

1:05:38.520 --> 1:05:41.120
<v Speaker 7>one scory list yards, Josh Allen one hundred and seventy

1:05:41.160 --> 1:05:44.280
<v Speaker 7>seven yards and one passing touchdown, Stroud to one hundred

1:05:44.320 --> 1:05:47.480
<v Speaker 7>and seventy four and one. This matchup's really tough. I

1:05:47.560 --> 1:05:53.320
<v Speaker 7>just don't see Herbert having a good day here. Yeah,

1:05:53.400 --> 1:05:55.760
<v Speaker 7>so I have a C grade on Justin Herbert in

1:05:55.800 --> 1:05:58.280
<v Speaker 7>the passing game. I'm still giving Alan the A though.

1:05:58.880 --> 1:06:01.920
<v Speaker 7>Over the past month, Broncos have allowed the second fewest

1:06:01.920 --> 1:06:05.320
<v Speaker 7>fantasy points to wide receivers. But Cirtan, we just saw

1:06:05.400 --> 1:06:09.160
<v Speaker 7>him give up a ton to Nico Collins, when hyper targeted,

1:06:09.200 --> 1:06:12.040
<v Speaker 7>and that's what happens with Allen. Not to mention, Sirtan

1:06:12.240 --> 1:06:15.280
<v Speaker 7>does not shadow into the slot very much, where Keenan

1:06:15.280 --> 1:06:18.800
<v Speaker 7>Allen does forty percent of his snaps, So nine plus

1:06:18.880 --> 1:06:21.760
<v Speaker 7>targets every game for Keenan Allen, He's gonna get his

1:06:22.040 --> 1:06:24.160
<v Speaker 7>I trust him to still get you that A grade.

1:06:24.320 --> 1:06:26.120
<v Speaker 7>I do have the other guys on the bench, though.

1:06:26.120 --> 1:06:29.720
<v Speaker 7>If Palmer is his practice windows open. If he does

1:06:29.760 --> 1:06:32.480
<v Speaker 7>come back, he just muddies the water even more. Quentin

1:06:32.560 --> 1:06:34.960
<v Speaker 7>Johnson showed up last week, but he'll be on the

1:06:34.960 --> 1:06:37.600
<v Speaker 7>outside a lot, and when Keenan Allen's in the slot,

1:06:37.640 --> 1:06:40.240
<v Speaker 7>he might get sartin. So I got him on the bench.

1:06:40.640 --> 1:06:43.480
<v Speaker 7>Donald Parum, I can't trust he gets a lot of

1:06:43.520 --> 1:06:47.200
<v Speaker 7>in zone targets, but that's pretty ballsy. Gerald Everett, however,

1:06:47.520 --> 1:06:51.440
<v Speaker 7>C grade leads all tight ends in separation. The Broncos

1:06:51.560 --> 1:06:55.000
<v Speaker 7>are the easiest matchup for tight ends. Eleven tight ends

1:06:55.080 --> 1:06:58.400
<v Speaker 7>eleven of them in twelve games have fifty yards and

1:06:58.600 --> 1:06:59.160
<v Speaker 7>or a score.

1:06:59.360 --> 1:07:02.880
<v Speaker 4>That's it's basically almost every week. Yeah.

1:07:02.920 --> 1:07:04.960
<v Speaker 7>In just the last four weeks they have allowed fifty

1:07:05.000 --> 1:07:08.040
<v Speaker 7>plus to each of the lead touch or tight ends,

1:07:08.280 --> 1:07:10.680
<v Speaker 7>and six tight ends in those four weeks have had

1:07:10.680 --> 1:07:13.560
<v Speaker 7>fifty plus end or scored. It's been four for forty

1:07:13.640 --> 1:07:15.720
<v Speaker 7>yards in back to back weeks forever. I think he

1:07:15.760 --> 1:07:19.960
<v Speaker 7>has a slightly bigger week this week. C grade Austin Eckler.

1:07:20.040 --> 1:07:24.080
<v Speaker 7>This one's tough, right, church yep, really thorny. Yeah, I

1:07:24.080 --> 1:07:26.640
<v Speaker 7>have a B grade on Eckler, but I really don't

1:07:26.720 --> 1:07:28.760
<v Speaker 7>love it. It's like the highest of seas of the

1:07:28.800 --> 1:07:32.120
<v Speaker 7>lowest of bees. If only there was something I could say,

1:07:32.720 --> 1:07:37.200
<v Speaker 7>they could designate exactly how I feel. On paper, this

1:07:37.360 --> 1:07:39.840
<v Speaker 7>is like the best matchup he's going to get. Second

1:07:39.880 --> 1:07:43.000
<v Speaker 7>worst against runners. A quarter of that was the Dolphins game.

1:07:43.000 --> 1:07:44.880
<v Speaker 7>I get that, but they've been hit by a ton

1:07:44.920 --> 1:07:48.320
<v Speaker 7>of runners. The Houston backs went well, went really well

1:07:48.360 --> 1:07:51.200
<v Speaker 7>against them. The Cleveland running backs did both of them.

1:07:51.560 --> 1:07:54.160
<v Speaker 7>The Vikings duo, the Buffalo backs, all of them over

1:07:54.200 --> 1:07:59.520
<v Speaker 7>the last month have done awesome against the Broncos. Here

1:08:00.640 --> 1:08:04.840
<v Speaker 7>that gets almost all the touches. He only has two

1:08:04.880 --> 1:08:08.040
<v Speaker 7>games over seventy five total yards, though, since returning from

1:08:08.040 --> 1:08:11.640
<v Speaker 7>that ankle injury, hasn't scored in three straight. This is

1:08:11.680 --> 1:08:14.040
<v Speaker 7>the get right game. If he's going to have a

1:08:14.120 --> 1:08:16.080
<v Speaker 7>get right game, by.

1:08:15.960 --> 1:08:16.519
<v Speaker 4>The way though.

1:08:16.720 --> 1:08:19.080
<v Speaker 7>He went to school, high school, and college in Colorado

1:08:19.200 --> 1:08:22.040
<v Speaker 7>and historically is great against Denver. Does that play in?

1:08:22.160 --> 1:08:26.280
<v Speaker 7>Does that play in over there, Brian, I'll allow it. Yes, Yeah,

1:08:26.320 --> 1:08:28.360
<v Speaker 7>he's got big games in five to the last six

1:08:28.400 --> 1:08:30.280
<v Speaker 7>against Denver. I have a B grade on him because

1:08:30.320 --> 1:08:34.120
<v Speaker 7>the matchup is too too good to ignore. I'm going

1:08:34.200 --> 1:08:37.519
<v Speaker 7>to ignore the split talk for now. I have to

1:08:37.520 --> 1:08:40.360
<v Speaker 7>see Josh Kelly get into the range before I actually

1:08:40.400 --> 1:08:42.000
<v Speaker 7>trust it, so be great on Eckler.

1:08:42.280 --> 1:08:45.360
<v Speaker 6>Josh Kelly did absolutely nothing when Eckler was hurt too.

1:08:45.760 --> 1:08:47.280
<v Speaker 6>He had like a bell cow role, so I'm not

1:08:47.280 --> 1:08:48.240
<v Speaker 6>too worried about that yet.

1:08:48.439 --> 1:08:48.599
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

1:08:48.680 --> 1:08:51.439
<v Speaker 7>Plus, Eckler is second in the league behind McCaffrey in

1:08:51.520 --> 1:08:54.800
<v Speaker 7>touches inside the five. The problem is only four touchdowns

1:08:54.800 --> 1:08:57.160
<v Speaker 7>on those fifteen opportunities. I know Charge hates that.

1:08:59.280 --> 1:09:04.120
<v Speaker 3>Philadelphia on Dallas, Brian and tons of angles and very

1:09:04.200 --> 1:09:06.360
<v Speaker 3>very meaningful game a lot of ways, But I think

1:09:06.360 --> 1:09:08.439
<v Speaker 3>for a lot of us, we're most excited that Dallas

1:09:08.479 --> 1:09:10.960
<v Speaker 3>Goddard off the injury list altogether and he's going to

1:09:11.040 --> 1:09:13.280
<v Speaker 3>be returning, and so many of us looking for tight

1:09:13.360 --> 1:09:17.920
<v Speaker 3>end help. Here comes a quasi elite level tight end

1:09:18.000 --> 1:09:20.640
<v Speaker 3>back for Dallas in Dallas Goddard. What do you think

1:09:20.680 --> 1:09:21.960
<v Speaker 3>of his opportunity in this game?

1:09:22.080 --> 1:09:22.320
<v Speaker 4>Yeah?

1:09:22.320 --> 1:09:26.960
<v Speaker 6>Also another like quasi homecoming game, Dallas playing in Dallas.

1:09:27.120 --> 1:09:29.439
<v Speaker 6>So a C for Dallas Goddard. But it is not

1:09:29.520 --> 1:09:33.960
<v Speaker 6>a good matchup Dallas the Cowboys. The Dallas Cowboys are

1:09:34.000 --> 1:09:36.960
<v Speaker 6>allowing less than four catches and forty five yards per

1:09:37.000 --> 1:09:40.120
<v Speaker 6>game to tight ends. No loan tight end has topped

1:09:40.120 --> 1:09:44.280
<v Speaker 6>five catches against the Cowboys this season, and Goddard last

1:09:44.280 --> 1:09:47.720
<v Speaker 6>scored against the Cowboys in twenty nineteen, but in the

1:09:47.800 --> 1:09:50.840
<v Speaker 6>wasteland in a suspected shootout. I will give the sea

1:09:50.880 --> 1:09:53.439
<v Speaker 6>to Goddard. I will mention real quick. These teams did

1:09:53.520 --> 1:09:55.880
<v Speaker 6>meet in Week nine Philly one, twenty eight, twenty three.

1:09:56.000 --> 1:09:59.000
<v Speaker 6>We'll reference that a few times here, sticking with the

1:09:59.000 --> 1:10:02.040
<v Speaker 6>passing game and going to the wide receivers in aj

1:10:02.200 --> 1:10:05.800
<v Speaker 6>Brown a B for AJB. Tough matchup on paper. The

1:10:05.840 --> 1:10:08.960
<v Speaker 6>Cowboys are allowing less than eleven catches, one hundred and

1:10:09.000 --> 1:10:12.440
<v Speaker 6>thirty yards and a touchdown per game to opposing wide receivers.

1:10:12.840 --> 1:10:15.879
<v Speaker 6>But of course you're not sitting Brown, who had seven catches,

1:10:16.280 --> 1:10:18.639
<v Speaker 6>sixty six yards and a touchdown in the first meeting,

1:10:18.960 --> 1:10:22.040
<v Speaker 6>and dk Metcalf also went off against the Cowboys last

1:10:22.080 --> 1:10:24.760
<v Speaker 6>week six catches, one hundred and thirty four yards and

1:10:24.800 --> 1:10:27.840
<v Speaker 6>three touchdowns. Brown could do the same. I'm not predicting that,

1:10:28.120 --> 1:10:30.080
<v Speaker 6>but you're not benching him. So a B for Brown.

1:10:30.080 --> 1:10:33.000
<v Speaker 6>You're not benching Devonte Smith either, Gonna give him a C.

1:10:33.439 --> 1:10:37.000
<v Speaker 6>Pretty much the same story for Smith that we have

1:10:37.120 --> 1:10:39.800
<v Speaker 6>with Brown. Not a great matchup, but he's tough to sit.

1:10:40.160 --> 1:10:42.799
<v Speaker 6>Smith had three catches, fifty one yards and a touchdown

1:10:42.840 --> 1:10:45.080
<v Speaker 6>in the Week nine game against the Cowboys, so he

1:10:45.160 --> 1:10:48.160
<v Speaker 6>is certainly startable here, as is Jalen Hurts. He gets

1:10:48.160 --> 1:10:50.360
<v Speaker 6>a B in that Week nine game. Hurts at two

1:10:50.439 --> 1:10:52.840
<v Speaker 6>hundred and seven passing yards with two touchdowns while adding

1:10:52.880 --> 1:10:56.760
<v Speaker 6>another thirty six yards and a rushing score. So a

1:10:56.800 --> 1:10:59.679
<v Speaker 6>safe B for Hurts against the Cowboys, who are ranked

1:10:59.720 --> 1:11:02.800
<v Speaker 6>six sixth in pass coverage by Pro Football Focus, but

1:11:02.840 --> 1:11:05.719
<v Speaker 6>they've surrendered three hundred plus passing yards end or multiple

1:11:06.120 --> 1:11:09.439
<v Speaker 6>passing touchdowns in four of their last five games. And

1:11:09.560 --> 1:11:12.559
<v Speaker 6>lastly for Philly, a sea for DeAndre Swift, who fell

1:11:12.600 --> 1:11:15.479
<v Speaker 6>flat against Dallas in the first meeting, was seventy four

1:11:15.560 --> 1:11:18.960
<v Speaker 6>scoreless combo yards on twenty touches, and in fact, since

1:11:19.000 --> 1:11:22.799
<v Speaker 6>Week three, Swift has topped one hundred combo yards just once.

1:11:23.240 --> 1:11:25.840
<v Speaker 6>But the volume should be there against the Cowboys, But

1:11:25.960 --> 1:11:29.040
<v Speaker 6>just a C four Swift and over to the Dallas

1:11:29.040 --> 1:11:31.479
<v Speaker 6>side and their running back Tony Pollard gets to see

1:11:32.040 --> 1:11:34.680
<v Speaker 6>he's picked up the pace recently, at least in terms

1:11:34.720 --> 1:11:37.000
<v Speaker 6>of touchdowns. He's now scored in three straight games. But

1:11:37.040 --> 1:11:39.720
<v Speaker 6>not a great matchup for Pollard. Philly is allowing just

1:11:39.760 --> 1:11:42.200
<v Speaker 6>one hundred convo yards per game to running backs and

1:11:42.240 --> 1:11:45.680
<v Speaker 6>they've surrendered just three total scores to the position all year,

1:11:45.720 --> 1:11:48.360
<v Speaker 6>So a soft seed for Pollard. A very hard a

1:11:48.520 --> 1:11:51.360
<v Speaker 6>though for Ced Lamb. Lamb did not score in the

1:11:51.360 --> 1:11:54.160
<v Speaker 6>first meeting, but his eleven catches for one hundred and

1:11:54.240 --> 1:11:57.240
<v Speaker 6>ninety one yards certainly made up for that. The Eagles

1:11:57.240 --> 1:12:00.920
<v Speaker 6>are allowing nearly two hundred yards and two touchdown per

1:12:01.040 --> 1:12:04.040
<v Speaker 6>game to opposing wideouts, so you know what, not a

1:12:04.040 --> 1:12:07.880
<v Speaker 6>hard ay. He gets the fantasy Fonsie a CD Lamb,

1:12:09.080 --> 1:12:13.320
<v Speaker 6>So you gotta like Brandon Cooks as well, Denniss Henry.

1:12:13.720 --> 1:12:15.920
<v Speaker 6>Brandon Cooks gets a B. He only had one catch

1:12:15.960 --> 1:12:19.040
<v Speaker 6>for seven scoreless yards in the first meeting, but Cooks

1:12:19.040 --> 1:12:22.120
<v Speaker 6>has been surging since then, scoring a touchdown in three

1:12:22.120 --> 1:12:25.120
<v Speaker 6>of his last four games. The only game, the only

1:12:25.160 --> 1:12:27.719
<v Speaker 6>game Cooks failed to score a touchdown during that span

1:12:28.120 --> 1:12:30.320
<v Speaker 6>was a blowout win against the Panthers, a team that

1:12:30.360 --> 1:12:34.719
<v Speaker 6>no one throws on, so that is certainly excusable. Michael Gallup,

1:12:34.760 --> 1:12:36.200
<v Speaker 6>I was close to giving a sea, but he's more

1:12:36.240 --> 1:12:38.240
<v Speaker 6>of a DFS dart throw. He's on the bench for me,

1:12:38.640 --> 1:12:39.880
<v Speaker 6>but Jake Ferguson is not.

1:12:40.200 --> 1:12:40.760
<v Speaker 5>He gets a B.

1:12:41.280 --> 1:12:43.679
<v Speaker 6>Fergie is now a top eight tight end this season,

1:12:44.080 --> 1:12:46.240
<v Speaker 6>and he could climb the ranks even more after this game.

1:12:46.520 --> 1:12:49.280
<v Speaker 6>Fergie had seven catches ninety one yards in a touchdown

1:12:49.280 --> 1:12:51.719
<v Speaker 6>in the first meeting, and including that game, the Eagles

1:12:51.720 --> 1:12:53.680
<v Speaker 6>have allowed a tight end touchdown and three of their

1:12:53.760 --> 1:12:56.160
<v Speaker 6>last five. So a B for Ferguson and Dak Prescott

1:12:56.439 --> 1:12:58.960
<v Speaker 6>MVP candidate three hundred and seventy four passing yards with

1:12:59.040 --> 1:13:01.880
<v Speaker 6>three touchdowns in the meeting. Easy A for Deck. That

1:13:01.960 --> 1:13:03.160
<v Speaker 6>was a thorny one. But I'm done.

1:13:03.560 --> 1:13:06.120
<v Speaker 7>You want to put some money on money on Dak

1:13:06.200 --> 1:13:10.280
<v Speaker 7>for me for MVP.

1:13:09.280 --> 1:13:10.840
<v Speaker 3>You're only going to get three to one on your money.

1:13:10.880 --> 1:13:11.639
<v Speaker 3>You're not gonna get.

1:13:11.520 --> 1:13:14.360
<v Speaker 4>A lot can give me I want Yeah, what's the

1:13:14.479 --> 1:13:15.479
<v Speaker 4>what's on tyree here?

1:13:16.960 --> 1:13:20.439
<v Speaker 3>That's that's a lot charge. He's like plus twelve hundred.

1:13:20.560 --> 1:13:22.960
<v Speaker 7>I'm still not you stole Ceedee Lamb from me and

1:13:23.000 --> 1:13:23.639
<v Speaker 7>our guy team.

1:13:26.360 --> 1:13:28.320
<v Speaker 3>I'm glad you're upset about it. I need him, baby,

1:13:28.400 --> 1:13:30.400
<v Speaker 3>and I need him. I need him this week when

1:13:30.439 --> 1:13:34.320
<v Speaker 3>we come back that epic game Buffalo at Kansas City.

1:13:34.400 --> 1:14:06.120
<v Speaker 3>Will talk that through when we return, final segment of

1:14:06.160 --> 1:14:08.599
<v Speaker 3>the win. And you're in addition of Fantasy Football Weekly

1:14:08.640 --> 1:14:11.200
<v Speaker 3>Paul Jarchi and Scott Fish Brian Johnson, you can follow

1:14:11.280 --> 1:14:13.720
<v Speaker 3>us on the site formerly known as Twitter. I'm at

1:14:13.760 --> 1:14:18.640
<v Speaker 3>Paul Jarchian, Scott is at Scott Fish twenty four, and

1:14:18.680 --> 1:14:23.519
<v Speaker 3>Brian is at b t x JA. As mentioned, heading

1:14:23.520 --> 1:14:26.760
<v Speaker 3>into the break, Buffalo taking on Kansas City in a

1:14:27.320 --> 1:14:30.280
<v Speaker 3>wild game. Get there. These are two teams that, despite

1:14:30.320 --> 1:14:32.880
<v Speaker 3>not being in the same division over the last three years,

1:14:32.920 --> 1:14:37.800
<v Speaker 3>have played each other five times, which is pretty staggering

1:14:38.240 --> 1:14:42.320
<v Speaker 3>for non divisional teams, and there's been a ton of

1:14:42.400 --> 1:14:46.080
<v Speaker 3>points scored typically in these games. Let's start in the

1:14:46.080 --> 1:14:48.800
<v Speaker 3>Buffalo bill side. Josh Allen comes in with an A

1:14:49.000 --> 1:14:51.639
<v Speaker 3>grade and so does step On Digs but for Diggs,

1:14:51.760 --> 1:14:55.200
<v Speaker 3>it's a little bit trickier. He is in gonna be

1:14:55.200 --> 1:14:58.799
<v Speaker 3>in a dog fight with the elite cornerback Lagerius Sneak,

1:14:59.080 --> 1:15:03.120
<v Speaker 3>who usually gets deployed against the opposing top wide receiver,

1:15:03.200 --> 1:15:07.120
<v Speaker 3>which is clearly Stephan Diggs. Get this. Since Week six,

1:15:07.560 --> 1:15:12.759
<v Speaker 3>Lagerius Sneed's average game against him two catches for twenty

1:15:12.880 --> 1:15:16.400
<v Speaker 3>three scoreless yards in his coverage. Just two or three

1:15:16.400 --> 1:15:20.320
<v Speaker 3>weeks ago, he did the lockdown treatment on AJ Brown

1:15:20.479 --> 1:15:23.040
<v Speaker 3>and held him to one catch for nine yards. So

1:15:23.120 --> 1:15:26.360
<v Speaker 3>this Lagarious Snead thing is legit. But we've seen Diggs

1:15:26.560 --> 1:15:28.400
<v Speaker 3>get this kind of treatment in the past and be

1:15:28.439 --> 1:15:30.960
<v Speaker 3>able to beat it. So I'm still got a low

1:15:31.040 --> 1:15:34.479
<v Speaker 3>A grade on Stefan Diggs, but just know there's some

1:15:34.560 --> 1:15:37.400
<v Speaker 3>sneaky downside on him if it comes to that. Now

1:15:37.520 --> 1:15:40.400
<v Speaker 3>this brings Gabe Davis into play. He's, as you guys

1:15:40.479 --> 1:15:43.120
<v Speaker 3>all know, he's the ultimate hit or miss player. I

1:15:43.280 --> 1:15:44.920
<v Speaker 3>lean towards hit in this one.

1:15:44.880 --> 1:15:46.479
<v Speaker 4>Okay, Now he had good games?

1:15:48.080 --> 1:15:51.880
<v Speaker 3>Has he had good games? Yes? His last two games

1:15:51.880 --> 1:15:56.479
<v Speaker 3>against Kansas City two hundred and seventy five yards and

1:15:56.600 --> 1:15:59.880
<v Speaker 3>six touchdowns. So you know we lean hit on this.

1:16:00.479 --> 1:16:01.479
<v Speaker 5>Now they know that.

1:16:01.640 --> 1:16:04.080
<v Speaker 3>Of course you'd think that they could do something about it.

1:16:04.240 --> 1:16:06.559
<v Speaker 3>But the problem is they got to put Sneed on Diggs.

1:16:06.920 --> 1:16:10.120
<v Speaker 3>That puts Gabe Davis on Jalen Watson for much of

1:16:10.120 --> 1:16:12.479
<v Speaker 3>this game, and I just think that's gonna put him

1:16:12.479 --> 1:16:15.559
<v Speaker 3>in a really good spot. And if you go back

1:16:15.560 --> 1:16:17.519
<v Speaker 3>to that Aj Brown game right where Brown had the

1:16:17.520 --> 1:16:20.559
<v Speaker 3>one catch for eight nine yards, gave on to Smith

1:16:21.280 --> 1:16:23.559
<v Speaker 3>six catches for ninety nine yards on the other side,

1:16:24.080 --> 1:16:26.240
<v Speaker 3>So I think that's where Gabe Davis is looking at here.

1:16:26.280 --> 1:16:27.840
<v Speaker 3>I think he's looking at the big game. So I've

1:16:27.880 --> 1:16:30.120
<v Speaker 3>got a B grade on him. You know who goes

1:16:30.160 --> 1:16:35.559
<v Speaker 3>to the bench, Dalton kN Caid far riskier proposition because

1:16:35.680 --> 1:16:39.320
<v Speaker 3>Dawson Knock is gonna play in this one, and Kinkaid

1:16:39.439 --> 1:16:44.479
<v Speaker 3>had five or fewer receptions in every game with Dawson Knox.

1:16:44.560 --> 1:16:46.799
<v Speaker 3>He had five or more with every game with Knox,

1:16:46.880 --> 1:16:49.840
<v Speaker 3>so there's some danger here. Kansas City's allowed the fourth

1:16:49.920 --> 1:16:53.200
<v Speaker 3>fewest yards to tight ends, the fourth fewest receptions to

1:16:53.280 --> 1:16:55.800
<v Speaker 3>tight ends, and no tight end is top thirty seven

1:16:55.920 --> 1:17:00.800
<v Speaker 3>yards in two months against Kansas City. So Kaid, for

1:17:00.840 --> 1:17:03.839
<v Speaker 3>as great as this was, this run was without Dawson

1:17:03.880 --> 1:17:07.040
<v Speaker 3>Knox with the matchup of knocks back. He's on the bench.

1:17:07.479 --> 1:17:10.680
<v Speaker 3>That leaves James Cook. His rushing output in yards per

1:17:10.720 --> 1:17:14.160
<v Speaker 3>carry have dropped in three straight games, but targets, receptions,

1:17:14.160 --> 1:17:17.240
<v Speaker 3>are receiving yards of all increase. The last five opposing

1:17:17.280 --> 1:17:20.040
<v Speaker 3>starting running backs against the Chiefs have averaged one hundred

1:17:20.080 --> 1:17:22.879
<v Speaker 3>total yards per game, with four of the five scoring.

1:17:23.360 --> 1:17:26.360
<v Speaker 3>The Chiefs have the fifth worst run defense grade by

1:17:26.400 --> 1:17:29.840
<v Speaker 3>Pro Football Focus and the worst run stop win rate

1:17:29.920 --> 1:17:32.800
<v Speaker 3>in the entire league. So I kind of like him here.

1:17:32.840 --> 1:17:35.519
<v Speaker 3>Cook facing six or more defenders in the box on

1:17:35.600 --> 1:17:38.760
<v Speaker 3>a league low eight percent of his rushing attempts. That's it.

1:17:39.040 --> 1:17:41.800
<v Speaker 3>So there's some nice opportunity for James Cook in this one.

1:17:41.880 --> 1:17:44.759
<v Speaker 3>I know we've many people have been burned on James Cook.

1:17:44.520 --> 1:17:45.920
<v Speaker 4>But I like him here here too.

1:17:46.160 --> 1:17:46.400
<v Speaker 5>Great.

1:17:46.760 --> 1:17:50.360
<v Speaker 3>All right, thank you, Scott. I appreciate the validation. We

1:17:50.400 --> 1:17:54.200
<v Speaker 3>talked earlier in this show about the struggles of Patrick Mahomes.

1:17:54.439 --> 1:17:56.679
<v Speaker 3>I told you over the last five games he's quarterback

1:17:56.760 --> 1:18:00.160
<v Speaker 3>twenty one. His average box score over those five games

1:18:00.920 --> 1:18:04.960
<v Speaker 3>two hundred and twenty two yards and one point four touchdowns.

1:18:05.560 --> 1:18:09.320
<v Speaker 3>That's it. Over the past seven games, the Bills haven't

1:18:09.320 --> 1:18:11.240
<v Speaker 3>given up many yards, just two hundred and twenty four

1:18:11.400 --> 1:18:14.400
<v Speaker 3>per game passing yards per game, but they've yielded near

1:18:14.479 --> 1:18:17.800
<v Speaker 3>the end zone, so maybe some more touchdowns coming. I

1:18:17.840 --> 1:18:20.320
<v Speaker 3>worry a little bit about Travis kelcey maybe being held

1:18:20.320 --> 1:18:22.120
<v Speaker 3>in check. We'll talk about him in a second. And

1:18:22.200 --> 1:18:24.360
<v Speaker 3>the rest of the wide receivers for Mahomes are total

1:18:24.400 --> 1:18:28.240
<v Speaker 3>wild cards. As always, Buffalo's secondary missing Tredavius White and

1:18:28.320 --> 1:18:31.360
<v Speaker 3>Kite ear E limit cornerback, but they've been okay without them.

1:18:31.560 --> 1:18:35.040
<v Speaker 3>Buffalo allowing the fewest yards per pass at just six

1:18:35.120 --> 1:18:38.120
<v Speaker 3>point five yards per pass, and so I don't think

1:18:38.160 --> 1:18:40.680
<v Speaker 3>Mahomes is gonna get much going downfield. The best I

1:18:40.680 --> 1:18:43.560
<v Speaker 3>can get you is a B grade on Patrick Mahomes.

1:18:43.800 --> 1:18:46.479
<v Speaker 3>I'm sticking with an A grade on Travis kelce because

1:18:46.479 --> 1:18:50.080
<v Speaker 3>of the absolute domination he's had against Buffalo in the

1:18:50.160 --> 1:18:53.559
<v Speaker 3>five matchups he's had since twenty twenty. His per game

1:18:53.640 --> 1:18:58.639
<v Speaker 3>averages are ten targets, eight catches, ninety yards, and one

1:18:58.680 --> 1:19:03.360
<v Speaker 3>point two touchdowns per game. Gigantic tight end numbers. Buffalo

1:19:03.439 --> 1:19:05.679
<v Speaker 3>has been a very good tight end defense this year,

1:19:05.680 --> 1:19:09.200
<v Speaker 3>though nobody his top fifty one yards. They've allowed just

1:19:09.320 --> 1:19:12.080
<v Speaker 3>forty yards per game to the position, which is excellent.

1:19:12.680 --> 1:19:16.680
<v Speaker 3>I considered giving Kelsey a B grade here, but I

1:19:17.120 --> 1:19:19.080
<v Speaker 3>can't get myself to do her. Guys yet, it's still

1:19:19.080 --> 1:19:22.840
<v Speaker 3>Travis Kelcey. I can't do it. Staying with the passing game,

1:19:22.880 --> 1:19:24.920
<v Speaker 3>how about ra she Rice, who has now established himself

1:19:24.960 --> 1:19:27.960
<v Speaker 3>as the clear wide receiver one on the Chiefs with

1:19:28.040 --> 1:19:31.120
<v Speaker 3>a second straight week of at least sixty seven percent

1:19:31.160 --> 1:19:34.400
<v Speaker 3>of the snaps and nine targets. His eight and eight

1:19:34.680 --> 1:19:37.559
<v Speaker 3>receptions the past two games are the first time at

1:19:37.640 --> 1:19:40.559
<v Speaker 3>Kansas City receiver has done that in over one year.

1:19:41.320 --> 1:19:44.160
<v Speaker 3>Rice's twelve red zone targets are tied for eighth in

1:19:44.200 --> 1:19:46.240
<v Speaker 3>the league. I mean that puts him in the conversation

1:19:46.280 --> 1:19:48.680
<v Speaker 3>with guys like Stefan Diggs and AJ Brown, So you know,

1:19:48.760 --> 1:19:51.960
<v Speaker 3>those fourteen red zone targets are excellent. The Bills allow

1:19:52.000 --> 1:19:54.920
<v Speaker 3>about one touchdown per game to wide receivers, and they've

1:19:54.920 --> 1:19:57.040
<v Speaker 3>given up six in the past five games. So if

1:19:57.040 --> 1:19:58.880
<v Speaker 3>there's a touchdown to be had for a wide receiver,

1:19:59.120 --> 1:20:01.720
<v Speaker 3>I like Rashi to be that guy, and I've got

1:20:01.720 --> 1:20:05.680
<v Speaker 3>a B grade on him. The running game is unfortunately

1:20:06.479 --> 1:20:10.680
<v Speaker 3>a mess in turmult here. Yeah, no, Isaiah Pacheco has

1:20:10.720 --> 1:20:13.080
<v Speaker 3>been ruled out for this game. Clyde Edwards Hilaire is

1:20:13.080 --> 1:20:17.679
<v Speaker 3>your starter. Pacheco is not going. As I mentioned, there's

1:20:17.680 --> 1:20:19.760
<v Speaker 3>some opportunity for Clyde Edwards Ailaire, and I've got a

1:20:19.760 --> 1:20:21.960
<v Speaker 3>C grade on him. The Bill's allowing one hundred and

1:20:22.000 --> 1:20:25.040
<v Speaker 3>thirty five total yards per game to opposing running backs,

1:20:25.040 --> 1:20:28.320
<v Speaker 3>that's ninth worst, and the Bills allow four point six

1:20:28.400 --> 1:20:32.479
<v Speaker 3>yards per carry, that's fourth worst. Edwards Hilaire, he's fresh

1:20:32.680 --> 1:20:35.439
<v Speaker 3>after being lightly used all season, and he's playing for

1:20:35.439 --> 1:20:37.439
<v Speaker 3>an offseason contract. By the way, he's coming up on

1:20:37.479 --> 1:20:40.160
<v Speaker 3>free agency, so there's a little extra motivation there. C

1:20:40.360 --> 1:20:43.280
<v Speaker 3>grade for him and a C grade for Jeric McKinnon

1:20:43.400 --> 1:20:47.000
<v Speaker 3>startable in PPR leagues. Buffalo allows the fourth most running

1:20:47.000 --> 1:20:50.559
<v Speaker 3>back receptions, fourth most running back receiving yards, and Buffalo's

1:20:50.560 --> 1:20:52.640
<v Speaker 3>allowed a running back receiving touchdown in two of the

1:20:52.680 --> 1:20:55.519
<v Speaker 3>last three games. So McKinnon expected to be healthy to

1:20:55.560 --> 1:21:00.200
<v Speaker 3>this for this game. And somebody you can use go

1:21:00.200 --> 1:21:03.599
<v Speaker 3>to Green Bay taking on the Giants. Scott Jordan Love

1:21:03.640 --> 1:21:07.360
<v Speaker 3>has been really very good over the last three games.

1:21:07.760 --> 1:21:08.000
<v Speaker 5>Now.

1:21:08.040 --> 1:21:10.280
<v Speaker 3>He's Scott what looks to be a very favorable matchup

1:21:10.320 --> 1:21:10.919
<v Speaker 3>on paper.

1:21:10.720 --> 1:21:11.559
<v Speaker 4>Against the Giants.

1:21:11.600 --> 1:21:13.439
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, he was might take a chance on me player,

1:21:13.479 --> 1:21:16.240
<v Speaker 7>but I'm gonna make you do this real quick. McKinnon

1:21:16.640 --> 1:21:19.360
<v Speaker 7>or Ceh, who do you start?

1:21:20.840 --> 1:21:23.520
<v Speaker 3>I'm gonna go Cech. I'm gonna take the sure carries

1:21:23.560 --> 1:21:24.639
<v Speaker 3>that he brings to the table.

1:21:25.000 --> 1:21:28.120
<v Speaker 7>Okay, back to the Green Bay, New York Giants matchup

1:21:28.200 --> 1:21:32.280
<v Speaker 7>Jordan Love and Jaden Reid. Should he go, which he should?

1:21:32.760 --> 1:21:34.639
<v Speaker 7>Were I take a chance on me players? Who else

1:21:34.640 --> 1:21:37.160
<v Speaker 7>do I got? I got Romeo Dobbs with a C

1:21:37.520 --> 1:21:40.639
<v Speaker 7>grade here, still get most of the snaps has scored

1:21:40.680 --> 1:21:42.720
<v Speaker 7>in for the last seven He's usually getting like three

1:21:42.720 --> 1:21:45.040
<v Speaker 7>to five catches a game. He's gonna get an ok

1:21:45.200 --> 1:21:50.000
<v Speaker 7>matchup against Deontay Banks, who let McLaurin and Wilson. That's

1:21:50.080 --> 1:21:53.479
<v Speaker 7>Garrett Wilson, DeVonta Ams, Ceedee Lambs all had great days

1:21:53.479 --> 1:21:56.160
<v Speaker 7>on them. But it took seven plus targets, and I

1:21:56.200 --> 1:21:59.120
<v Speaker 7>think he gets there. If Christian Watson doesn't go, who

1:21:59.200 --> 1:22:04.000
<v Speaker 7>hasn't practiced all week. I don't think he goes Christian Watson.

1:22:04.040 --> 1:22:05.960
<v Speaker 7>If he does go, I have a B grade on

1:22:06.360 --> 1:22:08.439
<v Speaker 7>a guy that's over the last five weeks. Only the

1:22:08.479 --> 1:22:12.479
<v Speaker 7>Giants are giving up more passing yards to receivers than

1:22:12.520 --> 1:22:15.799
<v Speaker 7>the Giants. Christian Watson scored four times the last three weeks,

1:22:15.800 --> 1:22:18.479
<v Speaker 7>but if he doesn't go, I'm giving Dobbs the see

1:22:19.000 --> 1:22:25.160
<v Speaker 7>Darth throw here in Dantavian Wicks he had four plus catches.

1:22:25.680 --> 1:22:27.840
<v Speaker 7>He had six catches for eighty five yards in a

1:22:27.880 --> 1:22:30.080
<v Speaker 7>score in the two weeks that Watson was out. That's

1:22:30.120 --> 1:22:33.200
<v Speaker 7>total like three for forty plus each game. He's an

1:22:33.200 --> 1:22:36.720
<v Speaker 7>interesting Darth throw. If Watson doesn't go, bench grade for

1:22:36.800 --> 1:22:40.320
<v Speaker 7>Tucker Craft, Luke Musgrave can't return, so he won't be back.

1:22:40.360 --> 1:22:43.719
<v Speaker 7>But Ben Simms did steal the score last week. Giants

1:22:43.720 --> 1:22:46.439
<v Speaker 7>have only allowed two tight ends scores all year, their

1:22:46.439 --> 1:22:49.200
<v Speaker 7>fourth best against tight ends. I'm gonna leave him on

1:22:49.240 --> 1:22:53.599
<v Speaker 7>the bench for this one. Aj Dillon, I got a

1:22:53.640 --> 1:22:57.240
<v Speaker 7>C grade on seventeen plus touches and three straight is great,

1:22:57.600 --> 1:23:01.479
<v Speaker 7>but it's amounted to sixty to eighty five scoreless yards.

1:23:01.920 --> 1:23:04.719
<v Speaker 7>I know Stevenson went over one hundred on the Giants

1:23:04.960 --> 1:23:08.280
<v Speaker 7>and Zeke added fifty. You know teams have tagged the

1:23:08.280 --> 1:23:11.800
<v Speaker 7>Giants a little bit more recently. If he was more effective,

1:23:12.080 --> 1:23:14.040
<v Speaker 7>or more of a pass catcher or more of a

1:23:14.080 --> 1:23:18.600
<v Speaker 7>scoring threat. AJ Dillon might get a B. But you

1:23:18.720 --> 1:23:21.120
<v Speaker 7>love the inside the five stats, I got one for you,

1:23:21.439 --> 1:23:23.320
<v Speaker 7>and tell me if you love this charge. We saw

1:23:23.320 --> 1:23:26.200
<v Speaker 7>Ben Sims score the one yarder so I had last week,

1:23:26.280 --> 1:23:29.879
<v Speaker 7>so I had to check AJ Dillon. His last attempt

1:23:29.920 --> 1:23:35.439
<v Speaker 7>inside the five was Week eight. Geez, he's not he's

1:23:35.520 --> 1:23:39.040
<v Speaker 7>not getting those so useless and he's hurt. Yeah, over

1:23:39.080 --> 1:23:41.800
<v Speaker 7>to the giant side. I have the entire passing game

1:23:41.960 --> 1:23:45.200
<v Speaker 7>on the bench. Packers allowing the eighth fewest yards and

1:23:45.240 --> 1:23:49.519
<v Speaker 7>fourth fewest touchdowns to quarterbacks and their top ten in

1:23:49.520 --> 1:23:52.360
<v Speaker 7>both those categories as well against wide receivers. You wouldn't

1:23:52.360 --> 1:23:54.800
<v Speaker 7>even know which one to start. Darren Waller's likely out

1:23:54.800 --> 1:23:58.160
<v Speaker 7>another week as well, so it's only Saquon Barkley with

1:23:58.240 --> 1:24:02.040
<v Speaker 7>the B grade. Over the last month, both Pittsburgh Backs

1:24:02.080 --> 1:24:05.519
<v Speaker 7>torched the Packers. Both Detroit packs to torch the Packers

1:24:05.520 --> 1:24:06.839
<v Speaker 7>Pacheco at one hundred plus.

1:24:07.160 --> 1:24:08.840
<v Speaker 4>Even Austin Eckler had.

1:24:08.720 --> 1:24:12.439
<v Speaker 7>Seventy yards, So that tells you where this defense is

1:24:12.479 --> 1:24:15.240
<v Speaker 7>on that with Tommy DeVito as the full starter, Barkley's

1:24:15.280 --> 1:24:18.879
<v Speaker 7>averaging sixteen for ninety four had a couple of receiving scores.

1:24:20.400 --> 1:24:24.040
<v Speaker 7>He's also still getting those catches two to four catches

1:24:24.080 --> 1:24:24.400
<v Speaker 7>the game.

1:24:24.600 --> 1:24:26.120
<v Speaker 4>B great on sek on Barkley.

1:24:27.040 --> 1:24:29.559
<v Speaker 3>All right, let's go to our final matchup, Tennessee taking

1:24:29.600 --> 1:24:33.599
<v Speaker 3>on Miami. Derrick Henry been ups and down. I think

1:24:33.680 --> 1:24:36.200
<v Speaker 3>this matchup Brian for Derrick Henry.

1:24:36.400 --> 1:24:39.040
<v Speaker 6>Not a smash spot for Henry. Unfortunately, I just have

1:24:39.080 --> 1:24:41.160
<v Speaker 6>a C grade on him. It should have looked like

1:24:41.240 --> 1:24:44.519
<v Speaker 6>Henry suffered at concussion last week, but King Henry never

1:24:44.560 --> 1:24:47.439
<v Speaker 6>went into protocol, so he'll be full go. But a

1:24:47.479 --> 1:24:51.400
<v Speaker 6>brutal matchup for Henry. Opposing backs or averaging just twenty

1:24:51.439 --> 1:24:55.080
<v Speaker 6>four touches against the Dolphins for one hundred and nine

1:24:55.080 --> 1:24:58.679
<v Speaker 6>combo yards per game. The Dolphins have allowed just one

1:24:58.960 --> 1:25:01.599
<v Speaker 6>touchdown to the running back position over the last five games.

1:25:01.880 --> 1:25:04.320
<v Speaker 6>So a see for Henry and we love him here,

1:25:04.520 --> 1:25:05.719
<v Speaker 6>but for those reasons.

1:25:05.760 --> 1:25:06.040
<v Speaker 4>Ty J.

1:25:06.160 --> 1:25:09.120
<v Speaker 6>Spears is on the bench in this one. It's just

1:25:10.040 --> 1:25:13.479
<v Speaker 6>even though he's arguably he's probably has the second most

1:25:13.479 --> 1:25:15.839
<v Speaker 6>receptions on the Titans, and it will be a positive

1:25:16.360 --> 1:25:18.800
<v Speaker 6>script for the passing game. I still got Spears on

1:25:18.840 --> 1:25:21.360
<v Speaker 6>the bench, but I got to see grade on DeAndre Hopkins.

1:25:21.560 --> 1:25:24.080
<v Speaker 6>You can't love his prospects with Will Levis under center,

1:25:24.320 --> 1:25:26.439
<v Speaker 6>but Nuke has seen at least eight targets and three

1:25:26.479 --> 1:25:28.920
<v Speaker 6>of his last five games, and you can expect similar

1:25:28.960 --> 1:25:32.040
<v Speaker 6>volume and what should be probably a positive game script

1:25:32.040 --> 1:25:34.320
<v Speaker 6>for the Titans passing game. Again, so a sea for Hopkins,

1:25:34.640 --> 1:25:36.839
<v Speaker 6>but he's the only one I'm starting for the Titans

1:25:36.840 --> 1:25:39.240
<v Speaker 6>passing game. Traylon Burks is back, but he is on

1:25:39.320 --> 1:25:42.479
<v Speaker 6>the bench. Chicko Konquo is on the bench. Will Levis

1:25:42.560 --> 1:25:44.800
<v Speaker 6>is on the bench. I think we might see Ryan

1:25:44.840 --> 1:25:48.439
<v Speaker 6>Tannehill come in relief in a revenge game scenario against

1:25:48.479 --> 1:25:51.560
<v Speaker 6>his old team in this one. So it doesn't know,

1:25:51.840 --> 1:25:54.759
<v Speaker 6>yeah both, yeah, why not both? He'll throw it to himself.

1:25:54.760 --> 1:25:58.080
<v Speaker 6>You might lead the team in both categories over the

1:25:58.360 --> 1:26:02.800
<v Speaker 6>Dolphins side. Ob A for Tyreek Hill. I have to

1:26:02.840 --> 1:26:06.080
<v Speaker 6>mention this stat really quick. Tyreek is averaging more than

1:26:06.240 --> 1:26:09.479
<v Speaker 6>at least forty yards in the first, second, and third

1:26:09.560 --> 1:26:12.600
<v Speaker 6>quarters of games this year, but like four in the

1:26:12.640 --> 1:26:17.000
<v Speaker 6>fourth because they're not using he should be averaging like

1:26:17.040 --> 1:26:19.240
<v Speaker 6>nearly two hundred yards per game. So an easy a

1:26:19.360 --> 1:26:22.519
<v Speaker 6>for Hill on a record setting pace. A for two

1:26:22.720 --> 1:26:26.439
<v Speaker 6>Tungo Viola, Jalen Waddle is basically an automatic B world

1:26:26.680 --> 1:26:29.040
<v Speaker 6>whenever he's healthy. He doesn't have the upside of hill,

1:26:29.240 --> 1:26:31.920
<v Speaker 6>but he certainly can offer you some upside with the

1:26:31.960 --> 1:26:35.599
<v Speaker 6>safe floor. And we're not going to Durham's smythe unfortunately

1:26:35.640 --> 1:26:37.760
<v Speaker 6>at the tight end position for the Dolphins. But we

1:26:37.840 --> 1:26:40.439
<v Speaker 6>definitely have to talk about Devin h Chan and Raheem Moster.

1:26:41.600 --> 1:26:44.880
<v Speaker 6>Unfortunately just a C for both because they're gonna eat

1:26:44.880 --> 1:26:49.040
<v Speaker 6>each other's lunch yet again. A Chan returned last week,

1:26:49.360 --> 1:26:52.799
<v Speaker 6>played sixty one percent of the snaps, handled twenty touches

1:26:52.840 --> 1:26:54.680
<v Speaker 6>for one hundred and three combo yards, so he was

1:26:54.720 --> 1:26:58.360
<v Speaker 6>technically the lead back. Raheem Moster took a back seat,

1:26:58.439 --> 1:27:01.719
<v Speaker 6>but Mostart got the short touchdown run finished with fifty

1:27:01.760 --> 1:27:05.960
<v Speaker 6>plus conbo yards. So certainly both are viable against the Titans,

1:27:05.960 --> 1:27:08.360
<v Speaker 6>who have yielded the seventh most red zone touches to

1:27:08.439 --> 1:27:11.280
<v Speaker 6>running back to this season and over the last five games,

1:27:11.280 --> 1:27:14.160
<v Speaker 6>Tennessee is allowing one hundred and twenty plus conboy yards

1:27:14.400 --> 1:27:15.880
<v Speaker 6>per game to the running back position.

1:27:17.720 --> 1:27:19.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that most at Achen thing will be it'll be

1:27:19.800 --> 1:27:22.760
<v Speaker 3>fascinating to say this goes down the stretch the you know, Moster,

1:27:22.920 --> 1:27:25.360
<v Speaker 3>we kept waiting for him to get hurt. It's you know,

1:27:25.439 --> 1:27:27.920
<v Speaker 3>we're getting close to mid Decemmer here and it hasn't

1:27:27.920 --> 1:27:30.160
<v Speaker 3>happened yet, which has been fantastic for his owners.

1:27:30.160 --> 1:27:33.320
<v Speaker 6>Of course, RB two Raheem mosart Is it's crazy on

1:27:33.439 --> 1:27:33.640
<v Speaker 6>the air.

1:27:33.680 --> 1:27:37.160
<v Speaker 3>It is. Yeah, fantastic season for him, no doubt about it.

1:27:38.080 --> 1:27:38.200
<v Speaker 6>Uh.

1:27:38.280 --> 1:27:40.679
<v Speaker 3>Thank you for listening to this win and in edition

1:27:41.080 --> 1:27:43.519
<v Speaker 3>of Fantasy Football Weekly. If you missed any part of

1:27:43.560 --> 1:27:46.240
<v Speaker 3>the show, you can check out all my player rankings

1:27:46.240 --> 1:27:49.240
<v Speaker 3>available at eighteen leagues dot com that is for free,

1:27:49.320 --> 1:27:51.679
<v Speaker 3>gat leagues dot com, also available in the guyoteen Leagues

1:27:51.720 --> 1:27:56.160
<v Speaker 3>app as well. Next week we are in the playoffs.

1:27:56.280 --> 1:27:59.439
<v Speaker 3>Playoff edition a Fantasy Football Weekly coming next week. We'll

1:27:59.439 --> 1:28:06.600
<v Speaker 3>talk to you that everybody, Best of life, Bye bye.

1:28:12.600 --> 1:28:16.200
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Football Weekly is a production of iHeartRadio. For more

1:28:16.240 --> 1:28:20.280
<v Speaker 1>podcasts from iHeartRadio, visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or

1:28:20.320 --> 1:28:21.000
<v Speaker 1>wherever you live.