Speaker 1: You are entering the freedom hunt. What is the left
Speaker 1: plan for America? Minneapolis is actually defunding police. New York
Speaker 1: City is moving money away from the NYPD. Social distancing
Speaker 1: was all about control. New York Times op ed chief
Speaker 1: resigns and also a Churchill statue defaced by people who
Speaker 1: think they are fighting fascism. That and more coming up.
Speaker 1: This is the Buck Sexon Show, where the mission or
Speaker 1: mission is to decode what really matters with actionable intelligence.
Speaker 1: Make no mistake America, you're a great American. Again, The
Speaker 1: Buck Sexon Show begins as he's a great guy. Now,
Speaker 1: welcome to the Buck sex and Show. Everybody. Thank you
Speaker 1: so much for joining me here. Let's get right through it, Shelley,
Speaker 1: because I just have some things I can get off
Speaker 1: my chest, right off the bat here, right out right
Speaker 1: at the start. What are we seeing right now in
Speaker 1: this country? Because to anybody who has maintained any sense
Speaker 1: of sanity, to anyone who has any real understanding of
Speaker 1: how the world works, of ethics, of morality, of society,
Speaker 1: of decency of truth, if you have kept those things
Speaker 1: where they should be, if you have not abandoned them entirely,
Speaker 1: you are looking at what is happening right now in
Speaker 1: this country and saying, what the heck is all of
Speaker 1: this about? And at a certain level, what you're seeing
Speaker 1: is simply the following. It is the widespread delusion and
Speaker 1: mass cowardice that has spread all across the country, colliding
Speaker 1: right the cowardice of oh, the leftist coming for us,
Speaker 1: and maybe we can buy them off, maybe we can
Speaker 1: convince them that we're good people. And the delusion on
Speaker 1: the left that there is a massive and systematic campaign
Speaker 1: of police violence against black people in this country. That
Speaker 1: is a lie. Start from that. It's a lie. The
Speaker 1: same way that the origins of the Black Lives Matter
Speaker 1: movement on Mike Brown as an innocent victim is a lie.
Speaker 1: We have facts, we have evidence, but they ignore that.
Speaker 1: They ignore that, And this forces us to confront a
Speaker 1: reality that I think a lot of us are uncomfortable understanding.
Speaker 1: And I'm going to get into the defunding of police
Speaker 1: forces that people are not just talking about. They're doing
Speaker 1: it now in some places. They're doing it here in
Speaker 1: New York City. Oh, they're calling it a reorientation of
Speaker 1: priorities and funding the community. They're defunding the police. These
Speaker 1: psychos are taking the craziest slogans that are currently being
Speaker 1: spewed by these protests make no sense, and trying to
Speaker 1: institute them. And what do we have in this country
Speaker 1: so many people in the media who are just cheering
Speaker 1: this on. Oh that's right, this is going to help
Speaker 1: us achieve justice. This is exactly what we need right now.
Speaker 1: That is nuts. But you also see what's really happening
Speaker 1: through these not just with the protests, but the narrative
Speaker 1: creation that's going on to the country. What's happening is
Speaker 1: a confluence. They're coming together of two very important moments,
Speaker 1: two very important things right now. One is we have
Speaker 1: been put through an experiment that is perfect for the
Speaker 1: creation of mass hysteria and we failed. The COVID experiment
Speaker 1: that we've just been through showed that if the media
Speaker 1: says enough that you should be terrified a majority of
Speaker 1: the American people, we'll just seed all their rights. Everything
Speaker 1: is fine. I'm going to listen to the experts and
Speaker 1: won't even hold them accountable with rage once the swindle
Speaker 1: has been exposed as it now has. Yes, COVID nineteen
Speaker 1: is a real disease that killed a lot of people,
Speaker 1: primarily the elderly and those with serious health conditions pre
Speaker 1: existing before COVID came along. Was it necessary to shut
Speaker 1: down all of society? New York Times is now publishing
Speaker 1: pieces from experts saying, you know, we probably should have
Speaker 1: been a more we took it, taken a more targeted approach.
Speaker 1: Oh you don't say, really, You mean that shutting down
Speaker 1: the entire economy like a bunch of tyrants and telling
Speaker 1: us to stay home, wear a mask. Don't see anyone
Speaker 1: wasn't brilliant epidemiologists coming together with a solution that was
Speaker 1: absolutely necessary. You mean it was a panic response that
Speaker 1: was exploited. Yes, yes it was. And we'll return to
Speaker 1: this and just a little bit on the show today
Speaker 1: because I'm not letting this go. I haven't gotten my
Speaker 1: apology letter in the mail yet from the libs. I
Speaker 1: haven't had the people that were telling me that I
Speaker 1: was being reckless weeks ago, months ago by saying we
Speaker 1: should My position on this was clear. We should be
Speaker 1: going to work as of the fifteen days to slow
Speaker 1: the spread. That was it. That was to let us
Speaker 1: reset and get ready for the disease. After that, we
Speaker 1: should have been going back. We should have been engaging
Speaker 1: in life. In life, people that to oh, it's just
Speaker 1: spend a haircutter, morons, We're never going to get these
Speaker 1: months back. And we didn't get anything really in the bargain.
Speaker 1: That's the biggest problem. And it set us on this
Speaker 1: path for Tony, a turnkey totalitarianism. That's what it has done.
Speaker 1: And now we're seeing this right now. There's a reason
Speaker 1: the left feels so emboldened because as far as they're concerned,
Speaker 1: government action that dictates it's every part of your life.
Speaker 1: And I'll get into all the police, anti coop stuff
Speaker 1: and the craziness of it, but I really I wanted
Speaker 1: to start here at the big picture of you today.
Speaker 1: What the left has seen is that it is not difficult,
Speaker 1: it is entirely feasible for the government to seize control
Speaker 1: of every aspect of your life, to tell you can't
Speaker 1: leave your home, you can't go to your business, you
Speaker 1: can't see your loved ones, you can't go to a funeral,
Speaker 1: you can't get married, you can't go to a doctor
Speaker 1: unless you're basically going to die unless you do. It
Speaker 1: wasn't hard for them to create this, wasn't hard for
Speaker 1: them to get to this point didn't take very long,
Speaker 1: did it. Do you think that the left now sees
Speaker 1: this and figure as well that was a one off? No,
Speaker 1: of course not. They've seen that Americans love of freedom
Speaker 1: is unfortunately a minority position now, a minority of American
Speaker 1: people care enough about freedom to do something about what
Speaker 1: has happened in this country now. Fortunately, there are still
Speaker 1: tens of millions of us who care about out individual freedom,
Speaker 1: the constitution, and basic dignity and human rights because all
Speaker 1: of this has been cast aside. Right, we had cops
Speaker 1: arresting people for going to playgrounds with their own children
Speaker 1: because of what the politicians and the media said, And
Speaker 1: now the same politicians and the media are telling us
Speaker 1: that cops can't arrest lunatics running around throwing bricks through
Speaker 1: windows because social justice or because systemic racism. So what
Speaker 1: you have here is and just just walk through the
Speaker 1: steps the establishment of America as ready as ready for
Speaker 1: government total control. It's a It's not a position that
Speaker 1: everyone shares, but enough. Wasn't hard to scare over fifty
Speaker 1: one percent of the American people into their homes, was it?
Speaker 1: And also to tell us that we had no choice?
Speaker 1: Where are the where are the big protests. I you know,
Speaker 1: tea party movement. Where are you? How about a return?
Speaker 1: How about that? Now? I know we don't have Trump
Speaker 1: out on the stump, we don't have the mobilization. This
Speaker 1: is all a left wing mobilization. That's Black Lives Matter stuff.
Speaker 1: They've done this before, Nothing came of it that was good,
Speaker 1: didn't save minority communities, didn't save anybody. In fact, people
Speaker 1: have a right to protest, yes, and I do support
Speaker 1: that right. And it feels a bit like unnecessary throat
Speaker 1: clearing that to say it all the time. But I
Speaker 1: also have a right to say that their movement isn't
Speaker 1: going to make anything better for anyone, and so far
Speaker 1: has only made things worse for everyone. Worse. That's all
Speaker 1: it's done. It's damaging, it's destructive, it's hateful, it's spiteful.
Speaker 1: It's not about having a conversation. It's not about reforming anything.
Speaker 1: You've got to be kidding me. Where is that happening?
Speaker 1: Defund police's reform? You know people who It's amazing we
Speaker 1: do how many individuals who are a part of these protests,
Speaker 1: in these movements never really stop and think what does
Speaker 1: it mean to be a cop? What do you really
Speaker 1: dealing with every day? And law enforcement officers, yes, they
Speaker 1: put themselves at risk, they put themselves on the line,
Speaker 1: but they're also asked to anyone that you if you
Speaker 1: really know somebody who is in law enforcement. They are
Speaker 1: asked to, yes, protect old ladies from being bludgeoned and
Speaker 1: assaulted and god knows what on their way home every night. Yeah,
Speaker 1: they do that, thank god. But they also have to
Speaker 1: step in and be a servant of the public for
Speaker 1: so much of the societal dysfunction that's out there. They're
Speaker 1: they're they're called into domestic disputes, they're called into you know,
Speaker 1: neighbors who are getting getting too heated with each other
Speaker 1: and somebody might pull a weapon. I mean, they're dealing
Speaker 1: with that stuff all the time, and millions and millions
Speaker 1: of police and public contacts, and the cops are lowering
Speaker 1: the temperatures. The cops are making sure that that husband knows.
Speaker 1: You know, you put your hands on that way, we're
Speaker 1: gonna lock you up. You know, you know, time to
Speaker 1: time to cool down, buddy. I mean, the cops are
Speaker 1: stepping in all across the country doing this. I've got
Speaker 1: to comp in my family, I work with the NYPD.
Speaker 1: If you actually know these people, they're us, They're just us.
Speaker 1: They are the community there there there, they live in
Speaker 1: the areas that they are policing, or they're from the regions.
Speaker 1: You know, if you're gonna be NYPD, you gotta be
Speaker 1: in the in the New York area. And yet it's
Speaker 1: just amazing how quickly this narrative has We've gone from
Speaker 1: cheering for first responders, including cops, to demonizing cops and
Speaker 1: being told that we don't need them anymore. The only
Speaker 1: thing that could do this is is a mass mobilization
Speaker 1: of the left, the Democrat Party, and say it. These
Speaker 1: are Democrats. These are Democrats who are destroying cities. These
Speaker 1: are Democrats who are calling cops racist murderers. These are
Speaker 1: Democrats who want to disband police departments. There are no
Speaker 1: Trump supporters involved. This is not bipartisan. When I say
Speaker 1: the left, I mean to be more inclusive. But understand this.
Speaker 1: Democrats are on the left. They are a part of this,
Speaker 1: they are behind this, they are this. And so what
Speaker 1: really is the goal? Because you'd have to ask, how
Speaker 1: could anyone be so crazy? What is the goal? Today?
Speaker 1: There's all these polls that are circulating showing that Biden.
Speaker 1: Here a CNN poll shows Biden up fourteen points over Trump.
Speaker 1: Drudge Report today, which I don't know when Drudge went
Speaker 1: never Trump, but it's a sad thing to see it happening.
Speaker 1: Drudge Report today has that Trump has the lowest approval
Speaker 1: or rather the approval was at Jimmy Carter levels thirty
Speaker 1: eight percent. This is the plan I just told you.
Speaker 1: I mean, that's the goal. Everything else that we're talking
Speaker 1: about and getting into the minutia of details with police
Speaker 1: and policing and communities and all this stuff, it's all
Speaker 1: a distraction. It's about the mobilization and the destruction of
Speaker 1: different aspects. The mobilization of the left from the destruction
Speaker 1: of peace, order, prosperity, create a perception that things are
Speaker 1: going badly in this country. It's about power, and in
Speaker 1: that sense they are. The left is successful. Right now,
Speaker 1: What happens if they don't mobilize in this way, What
Speaker 1: happens if they're not taking to the streets, shutting down cities,
Speaker 1: burning down neighborhoods. You know what? People will be looking
Speaker 1: at it right now. Wow, First of all, we religned
Speaker 1: to you largely by the left, by the elites, by
Speaker 1: politicians about the intelligence of their counter COVID measures, and
Speaker 1: also the lethality of this virus, which is, if you're
Speaker 1: under fifty, you are being absurd unless you have some
Speaker 1: special medical condition to worry day and day out about
Speaker 1: contracting COVID. In terms of the risk of your own health,
Speaker 1: if you're over seventy, it's a substantial risk. But remember,
Speaker 1: if the people around you are taking basic precautions, and
Speaker 1: if you are able to get more sources to the
Speaker 1: people who really need it, who are at higher risk,
Speaker 1: that's a much more effective strategy than just telling everyone
Speaker 1: to lock themselves at home, which is what we did.
Speaker 1: But it's all working out the way the left wants
Speaker 1: it to. And you have to remember these they're not geniuses, right,
Speaker 1: There's not some incredible plan that's so intricated and everything else. No,
Speaker 1: it's channel the rage in the anti Trump era of
Speaker 1: people who have been locked away for months, and some
Speaker 1: of them, i'm sure believing, most of them believing that
Speaker 1: they needed to do this, and they don't want to
Speaker 1: blame the people their own side. They don't want to
Speaker 1: blame you know, CNN anchors and Democrat Party officials who
Speaker 1: were saying stay home, that's the responsible thing to do.
Speaker 1: So all that rage, all that psychological dress, which is
Speaker 1: widespread across the nation right now, we have run a
Speaker 1: mental health experiment the likes of which nobody ever could
Speaker 1: have imagined. And the damage done to our collective mental
Speaker 1: health is massive. And they're taking all of that, all
Speaker 1: that rage and anger and frustration and I mean psychological instability,
Speaker 1: and channeling it into the most destructive and divisive causes possible.
Speaker 1: Because the rest of the country looking on at this
Speaker 1: just wants anything but this, anything but this, And that's
Speaker 1: how you get to Trump's sinking approval ratings. And Joe Biden,
Speaker 1: a confused, inept buffoon who will be a puppet of
Speaker 1: the Democrat left if he wins the election. That's how
Speaker 1: you get him with a lead over Trump. And that
Speaker 1: is the point. That's what all of this is about.
Speaker 1: The same way that they created this whole mythology of
Speaker 1: Russia collusion all a lie. Oh there was no Russia collusion.
Speaker 1: How many times did you hear that talked about the media.
Speaker 1: It was all a fantasy, But it was to create
Speaker 1: the perception of Donald Trump as a trader. And if
Speaker 1: he's a trader. It doesn't matter how prosperous the country is.
Speaker 1: It doesn't matter that we're not expanding wars in the
Speaker 1: Middle East, invading countries we don't need to sorry neo
Speaker 1: cons doesn't matter. He's a traitor, you see. And that
Speaker 1: gave this psychological safe space, you could call it, for
Speaker 1: the left to hate Trump beyond any boundaries of reason
Speaker 1: or evidence. It gave them that refuge of disdain. That's
Speaker 1: where they would go, Oh, look at Russia collusion. Trump
Speaker 1: is Putin's puppet. I was coming on this show and
Speaker 1: you know this, telling you the country is doing incredibly well.
Speaker 1: Enjoy this. It's amazing. I know other hosts are always
Speaker 1: running around yelling it's terrible. I hate it. You know,
Speaker 1: they're always yelling something about how bad this is or
Speaker 1: how terrible that is. Yeah, we have fights, we have challenges,
Speaker 1: but I'm out there telling you that things are actually
Speaker 1: were actually going incredibly well under Trump. And that's why
Speaker 1: they had to create this lie of Russia collusion, because
Speaker 1: otherwise people might start to see with their own lying
Speaker 1: eyes that the country is great and that Obama was
Speaker 1: terrible for the economy, and that Obama wasn't the leader
Speaker 1: that the left pretend that he was. But now they
Speaker 1: have a real crisis, and what are they doing. They're
Speaker 1: just trying to whist the knife in America's back, just
Speaker 1: make this even more difficult to come out of. We
Speaker 1: got hit with COVID. It was a terrible situation, made
Speaker 1: so much worse by the policy decisions. And the psycho
Speaker 1: left has been all locked up and they don't know
Speaker 1: what to do with themselves. And you've got the virtue
Speaker 1: signaling libs trying to rabble roles on the streets now,
Speaker 1: and all of it is what meant to make sure
Speaker 1: that perception is this country is falling apart because of
Speaker 1: Donald Trump, and because Donald Trump is so bad at
Speaker 1: this job, we must replace him, even with a complete
Speaker 1: imbecile like Joe Biden. Just get that one or two
Speaker 1: percent of the voters to switch and give Biden a shot.
Speaker 1: Anything is better than this. They will destroy America as
Speaker 1: much as they can, as long as it means that
Speaker 1: whatever's left of America is in their hands starting in
Speaker 1: January of twenty twenty one. That's all this is. Make
Speaker 1: no mistake about it. You're in the freedom hud. This
Speaker 1: is the buck Sexton Show podcast. You know, I'm a
Speaker 1: leader of this FTV movement. It means a lot of things.
Speaker 1: It can mean free to people, it can be for
Speaker 1: the people. It could also mean fire. It's a property,
Speaker 1: you know, and that's very possible to say. I'm leading
Speaker 1: a demonstration from Barclay Center at six pm to City
Speaker 1: Hall and that's the first stop. And we're hoping de
Speaker 1: Blasio and Cuomo come on and talk to us and
Speaker 1: give the youth some direction. But if they don't, the
Speaker 1: next stop is a Diamond district and gasoline thanks to Trump,
Speaker 1: is awfully cheap. Oh, here's a protest leader in New
Speaker 1: York in case you missed it, telling everybody on National
Speaker 1: TV who's not hiding it that Deblasio in New York
Speaker 1: City better do what we say or else we're gonna
Speaker 1: go and burn down some Jewish own businesses in Midtown
Speaker 1: at a little bit of casual anti Semitism just thrown
Speaker 1: in the conversation here by this guy and a threat
Speaker 1: I mean in that actual threat of violence. But remember,
Speaker 1: mostly peaceful protests, mostly protests. Our media deserves your disdain
Speaker 1: for the disgrace that they are, but also what they're
Speaker 1: willing to do to this country in propping up this
Speaker 1: movement that is full of psychopaths. Thanks for listening to
Speaker 1: the Busts. Remember to subscribe on Apple Podcasts, at the
Speaker 1: iHeart Radio app or wherever you get your podcasts. Team.
Speaker 1: What is our mantra during this crisis? Never ever bend
Speaker 1: the knee. I've been consistent on this one for days,
Speaker 1: days and days. I'm not going to stop. I thought
Speaker 1: maybe that at some circumstances, if someone felt morally compelled
Speaker 1: to show solidarity with the protesters, it would stop them
Speaker 1: from throwing things. I wouldn't judge them if it would
Speaker 1: prevent violence in a certain circumstance. But nope, never bend
Speaker 1: the knee. This is where now we recognize, beyond any
Speaker 1: doubt what's going on here, and it's it's a gesture
Speaker 1: of submission, and it's about self debasement. And the Democrats,
Speaker 1: of course, are doing this because they'll do anything. I mean,
Speaker 1: the Democrats, you know, Pelosi and schum are all they're
Speaker 1: They're all bowing and bending me anything they have to
Speaker 1: do right now, because this has become this black Lives Matter,
Speaker 1: anti racism movement has become a religious movement, and it's
Speaker 1: a religious movement for people, many of whom look upon
Speaker 1: religion with contempt. So this feels that very important part
Speaker 1: of one's life that usually you think of with religious
Speaker 1: purpose or relationship with God or spirituality. It is now
Speaker 1: with this the same way that climate change has transitioned
Speaker 1: into a religious belief. It is a religious belief. People
Speaker 1: keep saying it's not, but you're looking at it. You go, no,
Speaker 1: it is. It is. Provide them with evidence that something
Speaker 1: they don't believe is in true. They don't say, Wow,
Speaker 1: that's really interesting because this is about science and about fact.
Speaker 1: They go, how dare you are the oil companies buying
Speaker 1: you off? Oh? No, but some oil money sounds nice. Act. Actually,
Speaker 1: now people are running all over the place demanding, demanding
Speaker 1: that others bend the knee. Here here is uh for example,
Speaker 1: Oh we have we have Roger Goodell, who has now
Speaker 1: said that, you know, protesting, bend the kneed this. We're
Speaker 1: back on this. NFL players bending the knee thing. I
Speaker 1: gotta tell you, I mean, NBA, NFL, these leagues a
Speaker 1: lot of very spoiled, multi multi millionaires run around. They're
Speaker 1: my whole I don't really care that much about professional
Speaker 1: sports thing. Um, I was thinking that it was a
Speaker 1: way to bomb America back. But I'm starting to go
Speaker 1: back on that one a little bit because I don't
Speaker 1: think I can handle some of these some of these
Speaker 1: folks there their positions and using the position they have
Speaker 1: as a celebrity, incredibly wealthy individual to jam their ignorant
Speaker 1: politics down the throats of the American people. I mean,
Speaker 1: you know, a lot of a lot of the people
Speaker 1: were talking about here don't really know very much. Okay,
Speaker 1: it's just the truth. A lot of athletes, a lot
Speaker 1: of Hollywood celebrities just don't really know very much. But
Speaker 1: they're really good at one thing, and then we're supposed
Speaker 1: to listen to them about some of the most complicated
Speaker 1: questions in civic and political life. No. No, now that's
Speaker 1: when they step into my world, because I do this
Speaker 1: all the time, and I actually know what I'm talking about,
Speaker 1: whether people agree with me or not. I don't run
Speaker 1: around spewing ignorance and saying no, but but I can,
Speaker 1: you know, throw a football really far, l right whatever
Speaker 1: all these other things that these athletes do. Anyway, Roger
Speaker 1: Goodell of the NFL is saying, oh, we were so
Speaker 1: sorry we're wrong, because now everyone's just scrambling for cover,
Speaker 1: desperate to avoid getting crushed by the mob. Play for first,
Speaker 1: Mike and Doos's families, George Floyd, Brianna Taylor, amadarebrey in
Speaker 1: all the families living dirt, police paternity. We the National
Speaker 1: Football League, condemn racism in the systematic oppression of black people.
Speaker 1: We the National Football League, admit we were wrong for
Speaker 1: not listening to NFL players earlier and encourage all to
Speaker 1: speak out and peacefully protests. We the National Football League,
Speaker 1: believe black lives matter. I personally protest with you and
Speaker 1: want to be part of the much needed change in
Speaker 1: this country. Without black players, there would be no National
Speaker 1: Football League, and the protests around the country are emblematic
Speaker 1: of the centuries of silence, inequality, and oppression of black players, coaches, fans,
Speaker 1: and staff. We are listening. I am listening, and I
Speaker 1: will be reaching out to players who have raised their
Speaker 1: voices and others on how we can improve and go
Speaker 1: forward for a better and more united NFL family. I mean,
Speaker 1: what is this? What is he even saying? What's the
Speaker 1: point of this? Well, because now you're gonna have now
Speaker 1: the activism. If you were annoyed before about remember kneeling.
Speaker 1: They do specifically during the respect shown to the flag
Speaker 1: because they know that that will upset people. They know
Speaker 1: that that will upset those of us who think that
Speaker 1: it is meant to be a show of solemn support
Speaker 1: for the patriots who have fought and died for this
Speaker 1: country and continue to wear the uniform, and also for
Speaker 1: the underlying bonds that all Americans have through that flag.
Speaker 1: They do something during that to disrespect that sensibility, and
Speaker 1: then they pretend like, oh, we're not showing disrespect, we
Speaker 1: just have a voice on something else. No, I'm sorry, No,
Speaker 1: it's not gonna work, not on my watch. I'm not
Speaker 1: going to agree. They can say whatever they want. People
Speaker 1: can make all these different claims. They can say that
Speaker 1: black men are being hunted systematically by the police. That
Speaker 1: is a lie and it will never change. They could,
Speaker 1: you know, they could, you know, mob my building and
Speaker 1: burn me out and the whole thing. It wouldn't change
Speaker 1: what I've said. It is true. It doesn't matter if
Speaker 1: they deep plant for me, if they come after me
Speaker 1: in social media. What I am saying is true. What
Speaker 1: this movement is claiming on some of the most important
Speaker 1: issues is false. Doesn't matter what they think about it, It
Speaker 1: It doesn't matter how it makes them feel to hear
Speaker 1: the truth. But you see, that's that's supposed to be
Speaker 1: a casualty of this whole process. Truth is supposed to
Speaker 1: be part of what is under assault here, and it
Speaker 1: is it is. And then there's this just the Once
Speaker 1: you eliminate truth, then anything is possible. Right, Whatever someone
Speaker 1: feels like saying about something must be treated the same way,
Speaker 1: whether someone else comes along and agrees with it or not.
Speaker 1: This is where we are. This is the situation in
Speaker 1: which we find ourselves. So that then brings me to this,
Speaker 1: Oh my, that then brings me to oh, should you
Speaker 1: ever kneel? Did you ever know? Here is a law
Speaker 1: enforcement officer? And this, I think shows you the whole
Speaker 1: spectrum of what is really happening here and what the
Speaker 1: mindset is. It starts with, come on, just just kneel,
Speaker 1: Just just take a knee to show us that you know,
Speaker 1: you're cool and you support our cause and it's not
Speaker 1: a big deal. Why won't you take a knee? Come on,
Speaker 1: just just take the knee. And then when you say, nah,
Speaker 1: I'm not gonna kneel in front of you, because that's
Speaker 1: an active submission. You kneel before God, you kneel before
Speaker 1: you're You're king. Right there, you go through history. Kneeling
Speaker 1: is not something you do. Do you see your buddy
Speaker 1: and take take a knee in front of them, say hey,
Speaker 1: great to see you. No, if you were offered a
Speaker 1: job and the boss said, so excited to have you
Speaker 1: on board, Bob, We're gonna have a great time here,
Speaker 1: really wonderful benefits and salary for you. But just I
Speaker 1: want you to stand in front of me and just
Speaker 1: take a knee for a minute and look up at me.
Speaker 1: What do you What do you say? Just just take
Speaker 1: a knee for me. Wouldn't you think? What a psycho?
Speaker 1: Well that's the most bizarre thing ever. Well that now
Speaker 1: you know, law enforcement keeps getting told ooh, no, take
Speaker 1: a knee. It's all fine, you know, don't worry about it.
Speaker 1: But when they don't, don't do it? What are you
Speaker 1: some kind of racist? Why woul't you do what we say?
Speaker 1: It's always the implied threat, do what I say or else.
Speaker 1: It's not do what I say because it's moral. They're
Speaker 1: not trying to bring you over to the call. They
Speaker 1: just want you to show that act of subservience, show
Speaker 1: that you can be pushed, and then they've got you.
Speaker 1: Look at I mean, Drew Brees is speaking of the NFL.
Speaker 1: Drew brees Is wife has released an apology now or
Speaker 1: the weekend. She said we are the problem. She says,
Speaker 1: she realizes we are the problem. Well now she's kind
Speaker 1: of the problem, because this is ridiculous. Can we have
Speaker 1: Drew Brees apologize for, you know, centuries of systemic racism.
Speaker 1: I think he needs to apologize ten times. I don't
Speaker 1: think I don't think three is enough. I think ten,
Speaker 1: and I think he should have to just like in
Speaker 1: Game of Thrones, you know, he can do like a
Speaker 1: walk with people throwing tomatoes at him, totally naked through
Speaker 1: the town square. Right, maybe maybe van he'll show how
Speaker 1: sorry he is for saying something that was eloquent well stay,
Speaker 1: and in which he was completely correct. But again that's
Speaker 1: being correct and speaking the truth. There's no defense anymore.
Speaker 1: The mob is outraged all the time. The mob is
Speaker 1: seeking not not converts, but heretics. They want to find
Speaker 1: people who are heretics to their religious belief and they
Speaker 1: want to destroy them. That then brings me to this officer,
Speaker 1: this officer who I think, uh somewhat bravely under the circumstances,
Speaker 1: given that he's on camera, and now I'm sure he'll
Speaker 1: be hounded on social media and people will yell at him.
Speaker 1: And is this is how the progression moves from hepe?
Speaker 1: Would you bend the need of everyone shouting at you,
Speaker 1: you better bend the knee. Don't ever forget this play
Speaker 1: cliff two. Everyone's tak every hey, would you take a knee?
Speaker 1: Would you pray with us? No? No, you won't do that.
Speaker 1: You won't take a knee on camera in front of us.
Speaker 1: Then then the mob starts chanting, and that officer walked
Speaker 1: away and didn't do it. Right now, understand this, we
Speaker 1: are all, in different ways being asked to take a knee.
Speaker 1: We're being told to agree with things that are lies.
Speaker 1: We're being told to forego our rights, We're being told
Speaker 1: that our safety isn't something we're allowed to be concerned about. Everything,
Speaker 1: everything right now is up for debate, according to the left.
Speaker 1: And this is where this defund police movement comes in.
Speaker 1: What could be a crazier, dumber public policy idea than this.
Speaker 1: It's very challenging to come up with one. I mean,
Speaker 1: this kicks at the very load bearing walls of civilization itself.
Speaker 1: You have no police force you how can you have
Speaker 1: law and order unless the state has a monopoly unforce.
Speaker 1: I mean, this takes you all the way back to
Speaker 1: the origins of the nation state or of the state period.
Speaker 1: How can you have a government if the government's only
Speaker 1: asking people to do things, If the government does not
Speaker 1: take it upon itself to enforce the law. There's there's always,
Speaker 1: there's always in the background, the promise that if you
Speaker 1: don't do what the state says, And this is the
Speaker 1: this is the social contract. This is the basis of
Speaker 1: how nation states can function. If you don't do what
Speaker 1: the law says, there will be punishment, and that punishment
Speaker 1: will eventually be people with weapons coming to force you
Speaker 1: to answer for what you have done or what you
Speaker 1: haven't done. That's how this works. But right now we're told,
Speaker 1: oh no, there's an easier way, there's a better way,
Speaker 1: and it's insane, but it also goes to show you
Speaker 1: what the real project is, which is to isolate people
Speaker 1: that still see the world with clarity, to deal jitimize
Speaker 1: people that still think that facts and truth matter, and
Speaker 1: to just incite the mob for the political purposes of
Speaker 1: the left so that they can seize power. Think of
Speaker 1: what has gone on here in the Trump error and
Speaker 1: Trump era, and think about what they have been willing
Speaker 1: to do up to this point to try to stop him.
Speaker 1: The absurd impeachment, the Russia collusion, for special counsel people
Speaker 1: at the top of law enforcement apparatus, all the different
Speaker 1: media just pretending that they don't have to they don't
Speaker 1: have to be journalists anymore. There's something else. They're anti Trumpism,
Speaker 1: that's what they are. They've already gone all in against
Speaker 1: this president everywhere that they can. They've just seized the
Speaker 1: moment now with COVID and now with these riots to
Speaker 1: push even further. It's not about making anyone safer. It's
Speaker 1: not about making the world a better place. It's about
Speaker 1: being in charge of whatever world is left when they're done.
Speaker 1: You're in the Freedom Hunt. This is the Buck Sex
Speaker 1: and Show podcast. So this is what happened up in
Speaker 1: Minneapolis where all of this started because of George Floyd
Speaker 1: and the officer Chauvin who knelt on his neck and
Speaker 1: Minneapolis you might have seen video over the weekend. It
Speaker 1: looks like a looks like a you know, a demilitarized
Speaker 1: zone between two warring entities. Now there's whole areas burned out, destroyed,
Speaker 1: shattered glass windows. A lot of those are minority owned businesses.
Speaker 1: By the way, every they're going to come back. Now
Speaker 1: people say, oh, they have insurance. The insurance companies will
Speaker 1: fight over every penny. It doesn't cover everything. And who
Speaker 1: would want to who would want to open up a
Speaker 1: business again? You want to wait for the next riot,
Speaker 1: the next looting to come through. Remember the standard here
Speaker 1: is you've got nine black people a year unarmed killed
Speaker 1: by police. We're almost at zero as it is. I mean,
Speaker 1: that's pretty in a country three twenty million, that's pretty
Speaker 1: close to zero. If it's five next year, they'll be
Speaker 1: Then the next time there's one caught on video and
Speaker 1: it's a you know, it's a really bad add incident
Speaker 1: as this was, they're going to burn down another neighborhood.
Speaker 1: We went through this in Saint Louis with the origins
Speaker 1: of the Black Lives Matter movement, right, we went through
Speaker 1: this in Black Lives Matter just started as a as
Speaker 1: a hashtag. It was left wing active. It's looking for
Speaker 1: something to call left wing activism, which is why if
Speaker 1: you go on the Black Lives Matter website, there's stuff
Speaker 1: about respecting trans rights, and there's stuff about you know,
Speaker 1: social justice and socialism, and I mean it's really a
Speaker 1: lot of it is just repackaged Marxism with all this
Speaker 1: racially divisive rhetoric and language thrown in. Or or perhaps
Speaker 1: that's the vanguard of it, that's that the forefront of it.
Speaker 1: But here's what happened up in Minneapolis when Mayor Jacob Frey,
Speaker 1: who I've got to tell you, and this guy was
Speaker 1: at the George Floyd Memorial, which, of course lots of
Speaker 1: people gathered together forget about COVID doesn't count anymore. I
Speaker 1: will never listen to those public health frauds again. You know,
Speaker 1: where's doctor fauci Uh? You know, if you don't do
Speaker 1: to mitigation in at the protests, you know, social distance
Speaker 1: six feet between that, you're basically killing millions of grandmas.
Speaker 1: Where is he on this? He was? They were trying
Speaker 1: them out in front of us day and day out.
Speaker 1: You know, I'm sorry, you gotta ruin your economy, you
Speaker 1: gotta you gotta go crazy indoors. We don't have any
Speaker 1: science to back this up. No one's ever done this before,
Speaker 1: but it's the only answer. Get me my Presidential Medal
Speaker 1: of Freedom while you're at it, please thank you. Really,
Speaker 1: that's anyway. Mayor Frey is at the casket of George
Speaker 1: Floyd bawling his eyes out. Now, look, it's a sad
Speaker 1: thing this man died. You know. We're also if you start,
Speaker 1: we're gonna start talking more and more about his background.
Speaker 1: Interesting that he's become a martyr for this movement, given
Speaker 1: what has come out about George Floyd previously. It doesn't
Speaker 1: mean that he's allowed to have someone kneel on his
Speaker 1: neck and kill him. By the far from it, that
Speaker 1: officer should face the full punishment of the law. But
Speaker 1: to build a political movement around him as a different things,
Speaker 1: that's thing that's going to be more more fraught than
Speaker 1: I think many on the left realize. But but Mayor Frey,
Speaker 1: who is this young guy who clearly he looks like
Speaker 1: to me like the twin brother of that other total
Speaker 1: milktoast nincom poop left, the Prime Minister of Trudeau of Canada.
Speaker 1: I like when he sounds like he doesn't sound like
Speaker 1: this at all, which is disappointing, wouldn't he be if
Speaker 1: he actually wore a beret and it was like, I
Speaker 1: am Justin Trudeau. I am the best male feminist of
Speaker 1: all time. No, but also I have a little bit
Speaker 1: of a troubled pass. So when the photos come out
Speaker 1: and my keba quas accent, you know, is not enough
Speaker 1: of a distraction. Yeah, I'm sad that he sounds kind
Speaker 1: of like it sounds like everybody. He's like, Hi, I'm
Speaker 1: the Prime Minister of Canada because I've created this version
Speaker 1: of him in my head. Anyway, Trudeau and Frey very
Speaker 1: very similar in so many ways. Their politics are the same.
Speaker 1: They even look, I think a little bit alike phrase
Speaker 1: at the casket crying his eyes out. I mean really, really, man,
Speaker 1: you're gonna pull that. But oh, look at the Democrats,
Speaker 1: Democrats senators and Nancy Pelosia, Chuck Schumer. Oh, all the solidarity, kneeling, bowing,
Speaker 1: all this stuff. This is the this is their left
Speaker 1: wing religious mobilization. That's what this is. Remember, it's not
Speaker 1: actually a religion, but it is filling the place of
Speaker 1: religion in people's lives right now because they can't go
Speaker 1: to church because it's so dangerous Thanks for listening to
Speaker 1: The Bus Sesson Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts,
Speaker 1: the iHeart Radio app, or wherever you get your podcasts.
Speaker 1: Nothing is as crazy these days as the calls to
Speaker 1: defund the cops. Now, you may be thinking, but come on,
Speaker 1: they can't really mean defund the cops. They can't really
Speaker 1: mean that. That's just that's insane. I mean, anybody knows
Speaker 1: the defund the Cops. And the movie The Urge was
Speaker 1: not supposed to be a prediction. It was not supposed
Speaker 1: to be a documentary of the future, and any of
Speaker 1: you who have seen it, it's pretty good for what
Speaker 1: it is. It's low budge, but it does pretty well,
Speaker 1: and they made a whole bunch of spinoffs of it.
Speaker 1: But it's about a society where they allow all crime
Speaker 1: to be condensed into one twenty four hour period. Anything goes,
Speaker 1: including murder, and everyone has to just stay locked in
Speaker 1: their homes and try to stay alive through the night.
Speaker 1: And this is how they control crime. So it's all
Speaker 1: all that violence is focused. Now, it's an obviously dystopian
Speaker 1: concept but makes for pretty compelling viewing. And what we
Speaker 1: see here are people telling you that you don't need cops.
Speaker 1: Here's what I was getting to this before. But then
Speaker 1: I got into my comparison of Justin Trudeau and Mayor
Speaker 1: Jacob Frey. Goes Trudeaux. He's like a Mountee from a
Speaker 1: nineteen fifties on a horseback and quebec Quis speaking. He
Speaker 1: doesn't sound like that at all. I need to stop.
Speaker 1: I don't know. I just want to do my French
Speaker 1: Pierre accent for some reason today. But Mayor Jacob Frey
Speaker 1: was you know, he's at the heart of all this
Speaker 1: stuff because he's trying so he's trying so hard to
Speaker 1: try and be on the good side of the protesters.
Speaker 1: You know, he's one of the guys who wants room.
Speaker 1: He's an ally. That's the term he is. He's an ally. Well,
Speaker 1: here's what happened. When he was at a protest and
Speaker 1: he said, look, guys, I mean, come on, defund the police.
Speaker 1: I mean, we all know that's crazy, right. Nope, they
Speaker 1: do not think So here's what they did when he
Speaker 1: said that he didn't think that was a good idea
Speaker 1: of play clip three shame Shame. That's actually a reference
Speaker 1: to the game of throw and scene that I is
Speaker 1: mentioning before which the left loves using that one. Go home,
Speaker 1: Jacob Frey. This guy is literally on bended knee crying
Speaker 1: his eyes out as if George Floyd was his best
Speaker 1: friend in the whole world, and that's not. You can
Speaker 1: see this video of it. And look, it's nice for
Speaker 1: public officials sometimes to show solidarity at a funeral, you know,
Speaker 1: but I mean, come on, right, he's never met the guy,
Speaker 1: doesn't know the guy he's going to cry his eyes out. Why, well,
Speaker 1: we all, I mean we all know the question why
Speaker 1: we don't have to get in and we all understand
Speaker 1: why because he's pandering and he's a total fraud. But
Speaker 1: that's what you see all across the media. The Democrat Party,
Speaker 1: and remember these are Democrats. I'll say the left. When
Speaker 1: I say the left, Democrats, that's what. That's who's behind this,
Speaker 1: that's who's doing this. They really hate when you bring
Speaker 1: that up to that. All the protests, they're all they're
Speaker 1: all Democrats. All the people looting and riding if they
Speaker 1: vote Democrats. All the people engaged in violence against cops Democrats.
Speaker 1: People that want to defund police Democrats. I mean, you
Speaker 1: won't hear this other places. It would just be referred
Speaker 1: to in this obscure oh the protest or all the movement,
Speaker 1: or oh black lives matter, th' all democrats. Okay, let's
Speaker 1: let's understand that. And there was a mass movement of
Speaker 1: conservatives a decade ago called the Tea Party and there
Speaker 1: was no destruction, no looting, no violence, no nothing, no rioting,
Speaker 1: none of this, no insane demands. So these political parties,
Speaker 1: when it comes to their ethics and morality, are not
Speaker 1: the same. Okay. The left is the mob. And this
Speaker 1: is actually why I think if you haven't read it,
Speaker 1: she does not. You guys all know that I'm a
Speaker 1: fan of her work, and you know she's become a
Speaker 1: friend over the years. And Coulter's book Demonic on how
Speaker 1: the Left is the Mob? Read if you've never read
Speaker 1: it before, And look, I don't get kickbacks for, you know,
Speaker 1: trying to get you to read it right now. Read
Speaker 1: it right now. And if you've never read Bonfire of
Speaker 1: the Vanities by Tom Wolfe, excellent novel that will take
Speaker 1: you through some of the dynamics you see playing out
Speaker 1: right now as well. It's probably his best no of
Speaker 1: all time. But the Left is the mob, and it
Speaker 1: is the party. Of the mob. It is the party
Speaker 1: of you know, rabble rousing on the streets. And that's
Speaker 1: why it doesn't matter when you present them with facts
Speaker 1: and you have other stories and other things that you
Speaker 1: want to be a part of the discussion. No, no, no no,
Speaker 1: they're angry. People are angry. I've actually had in debates
Speaker 1: about these issues in the past. Someone will just say
Speaker 1: that to me, is if that's profound. People are angry
Speaker 1: about a lot of things. It doesn't mean anything. But
Speaker 1: Jacob frag gets told, Oh, if you won't defund the police,
Speaker 1: you're the problem. And then I mean, and you guys know,
Speaker 1: I have I've fun with the CNN anchors. I mean,
Speaker 1: CNN is the worst, is the worst place in the
Speaker 1: media right now, with the possible exception of the New
Speaker 1: York Times, which I've got an update on that story
Speaker 1: for you. Guess what, another another another head rolling over
Speaker 1: the New York Times, so that the woke mob feels
Speaker 1: like they're being heard someone else. Who Look, it's hard
Speaker 1: for me to get too sad for some of these
Speaker 1: libs that lose their jobs at these left institutions because
Speaker 1: they're always trying to get other people fired. So it
Speaker 1: seems like justice at some level. But you know, I'm
Speaker 1: a human being and I care about my fellow human beings,
Speaker 1: and I want what's best for them. And here's another
Speaker 1: guy who won't be able to pay his bills, won't
Speaker 1: you know, he's gonna have to look at his kid now.
Speaker 1: On the left, he'll he'll get another job, he'll be fine.
Speaker 1: But you know, for some people this can be a
Speaker 1: real disruption. See, I actually think about other human beings
Speaker 1: and have sympathy for them, unlike the Unlike the left
Speaker 1: that thinks that the forty million people who have lost
Speaker 1: their jobs just want a haircut man. They don't care.
Speaker 1: They're not upset about the COVID restrictions for any reason
Speaker 1: other than some basic inconvenience. Really, there are people who
Speaker 1: are running up credit card debt, can't pay their bills,
Speaker 1: lost their jobs for no fault of their own, and
Speaker 1: these psychotic libs want to pretend that somehow they have
Speaker 1: no point to make. We'll get back to the lockdown
Speaker 1: thing in a little bit, but but here's CNN. Really,
Speaker 1: if there's a thing that triggers me these days, and
Speaker 1: not in a way where I feel unshafe, but away
Speaker 1: where I just fly into a blind rage. I mean,
Speaker 1: the CNN is full of the worst people in the
Speaker 1: media now, the worst, the absolute worst, and they're all egomaniacs.
Speaker 1: They don't care what's happening to you. They don't care
Speaker 1: what's happening around the country. They all live in a
Speaker 1: very small group of places for the ultra rich. They
Speaker 1: have chauffeurs taking them literally shou first. This is true
Speaker 1: to and from their workplaces. They all fled for their
Speaker 1: second or third or fourth homes when the COVID thing
Speaker 1: broke out, And we're doing the shows from home, trying
Speaker 1: to make it seem like they were still in studio,
Speaker 1: but you know they're doing it from home. They're the worst.
Speaker 1: Here is handsOn Camorado talking to This is a member
Speaker 1: of the she's a CNN anchor, and she's speaking to
Speaker 1: a member of the Minneapolis City Council, which has in
Speaker 1: fact now voted it's a veto proof majority they have.
Speaker 1: They have voted to defund the Minneapolis Police and no
Speaker 1: one even knows. And now I say that, I don't
Speaker 1: even understand what they really think is going to happen next.
Speaker 1: I don't know if the police have funds to a
Speaker 1: certain I don't think they know. I think they're just
Speaker 1: they're just trying to placate the mob, trying to be
Speaker 1: a part of the mob. Really, they're not trying to placated.
Speaker 1: They don't have a problem with the mob. They want
Speaker 1: to be in with the mob. But they have voted
Speaker 1: to defund the police. They have actually done this in
Speaker 1: Minneapolis now, and I know you know, we are on
Speaker 1: a station in Minneapolis. So please, those of you who
Speaker 1: listen Team Buck Minneapolis, let us know what the heck
Speaker 1: is going on in your city right now, because the
Speaker 1: rest of the country is looking at this. Everyone who's
Speaker 1: saying and saying this is completely crazy. They can't really
Speaker 1: be doing this. No, they are, they are. You know,
Speaker 1: I was on Tucker Show last week and I said,
Speaker 1: defunding the police is insane, but it's not impossible. Turns
Speaker 1: out I was right. That was the first thing I
Speaker 1: said on the on Tucker Show on Thursday. Defunding the
Speaker 1: police is insane, but it's not impossible. And now they're defunding.
Speaker 1: They're actually doing this and camera. Allison Camarada is very serious.
Speaker 1: She cares a lot about social justice. You know, she
Speaker 1: just wants to get to the truth. And here she
Speaker 1: is with a member of the Minneapolis City Council asking
Speaker 1: her about this. And you know that you're because again
Speaker 1: you are listening to this show, and you're approaching this
Speaker 1: as a normal person who understands how the world functions,
Speaker 1: and you're saying, no police force. Well, they can't be serious, because,
Speaker 1: for example, what are people in Minneapolis supposed to do
Speaker 1: when they hear somebody trying to beat down their door
Speaker 1: or crash, you know, crash through the glass of a
Speaker 1: first floor window at two o'clock in the morning. Who
Speaker 1: are you gonna call? Oh? No, the social justice people
Speaker 1: want you to know that. Well, yeah, but the cops.
Speaker 1: Calling the cops makes it a more dangerous situation. So
Speaker 1: we've now gone to the place where the example that
Speaker 1: we would use to explain how in saying the libs,
Speaker 1: the left the Democrats are hey, who are you gonna
Speaker 1: call at two o'clock in the morning someone's breaking into
Speaker 1: your house. They look at you and they go wow,
Speaker 1: But like cops are like really dangerous, So like it's
Speaker 1: better you can't call the cops. What all right? It's
Speaker 1: here she is play clip six. I'll let her, I'll
Speaker 1: let the city council numbers speak for herself. Play six.
Speaker 1: You know, there's lessons from all over the country, all
Speaker 1: over the world that we're looking to to take immediate
Speaker 1: steps while we work toward building the systems that we
Speaker 1: would need to imagine that that future. Do you understand
Speaker 1: that the word dismantle or police free also makes some
Speaker 1: people nervous? For instance, what if in the middle of
Speaker 1: the night my home is broken into who do I call? Yes?
Speaker 1: I mean, I hear that loud and clear from a
Speaker 1: lot of my neighbors, and I know and myself too,
Speaker 1: And I know that that comes from a place of privilege.
Speaker 1: Because for those of us for whom the system is working,
Speaker 1: I think we need to start back and imagine what
Speaker 1: it would feel like to already live in that reality
Speaker 1: where calling the police may mean more harm is done.
Speaker 1: Calling the police may mean more harm done. Calling the
Speaker 1: police could make the situation worse when you hear that
Speaker 1: crash through your window at two o'clock in the morning.
Speaker 1: So that's the answer, that's the justification given for what's
Speaker 1: going to happen when there's no cops. The cops make
Speaker 1: it worse. I you know, this is why last week
Speaker 1: I said to you, there's no way to reason with
Speaker 1: those who don't care about reason like there's Once you've
Speaker 1: abandoned facts and sanity and truth and normalcy and objectivity
Speaker 1: at how do you even have a conversation. You can't
Speaker 1: have a conversation with people when they think things like
Speaker 1: cops are work calling cops. Think about it this way.
Speaker 1: You have millions and millions of arrests, ten million arrests
Speaker 1: every year. We count the number of people who are
Speaker 1: unarmed killed by cops by a few dozen. How many
Speaker 1: people are murdered every year fifteen thousand, give or take
Speaker 1: in the United States. How many more people would be
Speaker 1: murdered if there were no cops. Your guests is as
Speaker 1: good as mine, but it's gonna be a lot more
Speaker 1: than fifteen thousand. I can assure you of that. In
Speaker 1: these minority communities that we're being told the cops are
Speaker 1: such an evil force. When a drug dealer, now kill somebody,
Speaker 1: or let's say, you know, shoots. This happens in Chicago
Speaker 1: all the time. Drug dealers get into a gun battle
Speaker 1: they have you know that they're just firing rounds all
Speaker 1: over a civilian area. And you know, a ten year
Speaker 1: old girl gets hit by a bullet. There's no cops.
Speaker 1: What you're gonna send the social workers after them? This
Speaker 1: is going to be law and order social workers unit.
Speaker 1: That's what they think is going to happen. They're they're
Speaker 1: gonna have a nice conversation with them. I got news
Speaker 1: for those social workers. They're gonna get shot at two.
Speaker 1: But this is what they're talking about. This is the
Speaker 1: level of insanity, and this is the level of absurdity
Speaker 1: that the Democrat Party is embracing, because remember, it doesn't
Speaker 1: whatever destruction happens, what it doesn't. It's all about mobilization
Speaker 1: and making the country destable and feel like things are
Speaker 1: going terribly so whatever they can do to achieve that,
Speaker 1: it doesn't matter. Right, The Democratic Party now views itself
Speaker 1: largely as an anti Trump insurgency. And one thing I
Speaker 1: can tell you about an insurgency in a rock and Afghanistan,
Speaker 1: and all of you listening who served over there in
Speaker 1: the military know exactly what I'm talking about. All they
Speaker 1: have to do is blow stuff up, kill people, and
Speaker 1: calls a mess and then people eventually say, look, I mean,
Speaker 1: if you can't protect me, maybe the insurgents can. So
Speaker 1: hear what they're doing. They're not blowing things up I
Speaker 1: mean necessarily. I mean they're not actually taking those same
Speaker 1: tactics because that would be self defeating at this phase.
Speaker 1: But they are engaged in destabilization, massive, massive looting, riding,
Speaker 1: and anarchy on the streets, so that people just say, well,
Speaker 1: I guess the Trump era has brought this about. I'll
Speaker 1: go with anything that's not this. The alternative has to
Speaker 1: be better than this. So they're incentivized to keep this
Speaker 1: going as long as they can. And I think what
Speaker 1: you'll see is actually repeated waves of this, waves of this,
Speaker 1: waves of this, because now it it becomes their method
Speaker 1: of switching whatever the news cycle is, switching it away
Speaker 1: from a topic they don't like to a topic they
Speaker 1: do like. Right, there's good jobs, numbers ride in the streets,
Speaker 1: black lives matter, silence is violence, All the things you're
Speaker 1: hearing being chanted And you say, well, hold on, can
Speaker 1: we actually had the economy starting to get a little better?
Speaker 1: Do you not care about black lives? Wait? Wait, I thought,
Speaker 1: but this is a segment on the economy. Well, are
Speaker 1: you not going to bend the knee? Really? Really, you
Speaker 1: don't think that bad things are happening in minority communities
Speaker 1: across the country every day that law enforcement systemically races. Wait,
Speaker 1: but we're trying to The jobs affects everybody, The economy
Speaker 1: affects out No, it doesn't, how dare you? That's where
Speaker 1: this all goes. It becomes their mechanism for controlling the
Speaker 1: conversation and also switching perception, and that is what they
Speaker 1: will continue to do. So I don't think even if
Speaker 1: this fades away, which it might but it might not,
Speaker 1: it'll come back. It'll come back just in time, as
Speaker 1: will the demands for lockdowns, because even the possibility of
Speaker 1: lockdowns in some states will tank the economy enough right
Speaker 1: before the election to make people think that something else
Speaker 1: has to be better than this. Anything is better than
Speaker 1: Trump is what the Democrats want as their rallying cry.
Speaker 1: So guess what all you have to do for that
Speaker 1: is make life unlivable for as many people as possible,
Speaker 1: and then the alternative becomes the only answer. Even if
Speaker 1: the alternative is a buffoon who forgets what country he's in,
Speaker 1: what year it is, or what office he's running for.
Speaker 1: They don't care. You're in the freedom hunt. This is
Speaker 1: the Buck Sex and Show podcast I will never call
Speaker 1: sign on funding a police department that continues to brutalize us.
Speaker 1: And I will never stop saying, not only do we
Speaker 1: need to disinvest for in police, but we need to
Speaker 1: completely dismantle the Minneapolis Police Department. The Minneapolis Police Department
Speaker 1: is rotten to the route, and so when we dismantle it,
Speaker 1: we get rid of that cancer and we allow for
Speaker 1: something beautiful to rise. And that reimagining allows us to
Speaker 1: figure out what public safe look like for us. Dismantle
Speaker 1: the police department, sitting US Member of Congress Ilhan Omar says,
Speaker 1: and she says this as someone who represents a district
Speaker 1: in Minneapolis that was the most destroyed of all in
Speaker 1: Minnesota as a result of the riots and protests that
Speaker 1: happened here. So her answer is to get rid of
Speaker 1: all cops. The cops couldn't even handle the riots they
Speaker 1: already had. Now she's saying, get rid of police. So
Speaker 1: you'd have to wonder what is going to replace the police?
Speaker 1: How are you going to have anybody think that they
Speaker 1: could be safe safe there? Keep in mind that last
Speaker 1: year I thought this was internet. According to the Minneapolis
Speaker 1: Star Tribune, Saint Paul's homicide rate, says here, doubled year
Speaker 1: the year before, So there has been a surge in
Speaker 1: killings and you'd want to know, Hold on a second,
Speaker 1: why is that happening the meeting. I mean, here's this
Speaker 1: Star tribute in twenty nineteen homicides in Saint Paul from
Speaker 1: Minneapolis Saint Paul, the overwhelming majority died of gunshots. That's
Speaker 1: not surprising. About half the killings have resulted in murder
Speaker 1: or manslaughter charges. That is not a high clearance rate.
Speaker 1: I'm trying to see what the number of many as
Speaker 1: Saint Paul surpassed twenty five homicides for the year. So
Speaker 1: you want to know what happens. What happens when they
Speaker 1: get rid of the cops? What happens to the people
Speaker 1: that have been killed? Did their families get any justice?
Speaker 1: They're gonna have social workers show up. So I mean,
Speaker 1: they went from fifteen, sorry it was fifteen to thirty,
Speaker 1: is what the Star tribute here says. So they're already
Speaker 1: seeing a spike that Look, it's a small number overall,
Speaker 1: but that's just one city. What happens when you get
Speaker 1: rid of all the cops? Who solves those murders? Thanks
Speaker 1: for listening to The Bus Sesson Show podcasts. Remember to
Speaker 1: subscribe on Apple podcasts, the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you
Speaker 1: get your podcasts. We send out people with guns, and
Speaker 1: they are there to use deadly force no matter what
Speaker 1: the problem may be. If the problem is sexual assault,
Speaker 1: we send somebody with a gun. If the problem is
Speaker 1: domestic advice, we send somebody with a gun. If the
Speaker 1: problem is somebody in a mental health crisis, we send
Speaker 1: somebody with a gun. And I think that what we
Speaker 1: need to do as a society, as a city is
Speaker 1: to say, is there a better way to have people
Speaker 1: be safe and secure, to investigate crime, and to hold
Speaker 1: people accountable? Is there a better way to conceive of this?
Speaker 1: Because let me tell you, so many of our When
Speaker 1: President Obama had twenty first century policing, it was groundbreaking.
Speaker 1: They had a lot of great reforms. Why did you
Speaker 1: call it twenty first century? Because so much of our
Speaker 1: policing is rooted in the twentieth century or even the
Speaker 1: nineteenth century. We haven't really updated what we do in
Speaker 1: terms of training, in terms of preparation, in terms of
Speaker 1: various problems, and so much of safety and security involves
Speaker 1: mental health. Professionals, involves recreation for youth, It involves a
Speaker 1: lot of things. And just having a paramilitary group where
Speaker 1: we send somebody with a gun to solve every problem
Speaker 1: might not be the only way or the best way.
Speaker 1: We don't send someone with a gun to solve every problem.
Speaker 1: Everything Keith Ellison says here is effectively a lie, untrue,
Speaker 1: or a misdirection. What he says, you know, when there's
Speaker 1: domestic violence, we send somebody with a gun. Yeah, because
Speaker 1: that's actually the most dangerous thing that most cops do that.
Speaker 1: And traffic stops per capita, because you know what happens
Speaker 1: when you're in a traffic stop you run someone's plates.
Speaker 1: You know, you might find out when you're running their
Speaker 1: plates that they're warned in three states for murder. Guess
Speaker 1: what happens if you show up and you think you're
Speaker 1: just running a ticket, but you don't have a gun.
Speaker 1: You're sitting duck. Guess what happens when you show up
Speaker 1: to a domestic violence dispute and you have no means
Speaker 1: of defending yourself and you know, the crazy, violent, you know,
Speaker 1: drugged up husband decides that you're, you know, getting in
Speaker 1: the way of his fun by abusing his family and
Speaker 1: doing horrible things and comes at you with a baseball bat.
Speaker 1: You're gonna say, oh, just so, I'm just part of
Speaker 1: the special special social workers you did, sir, don't don't
Speaker 1: hit me with that bat. How much dumber is the
Speaker 1: left going to get it? I don't know that they've
Speaker 1: really gone down to the stupidity basement. I don't know
Speaker 1: if there's there's a level below this. We send men
Speaker 1: with guns, there's a reason for that. Has Keith Ellison
Speaker 1: never spoken to somebody in law enforcement? Does he have
Speaker 1: no idea what he's talking about. We have social workers,
Speaker 1: we have people that work for you know, in New
Speaker 1: York they call the Department of Health and Mental Hygiene.
Speaker 1: There are people that come to deal with problems all
Speaker 1: the time. Don't have guns. We've got park rangers in
Speaker 1: New York that don't have guns. Some park rangers do
Speaker 1: in some places because they need to. Oh you know why,
Speaker 1: because you know it'll happen if you catch somebody poaching
Speaker 1: in a national park and they got two guys with
Speaker 1: high powered rifles and you're unarmed. Maybe they don't want
Speaker 1: to face one hundred thousand dollars fine and a year
Speaker 1: or two in federal prison. So guess what, you know,
Speaker 1: there are reasons that people carry in law enforcement, that
Speaker 1: they carry the weapons that they do, and people say, oh,
Speaker 1: buck well, what about in Great Britain? Okay? Yeah, First
Speaker 1: of all, if you want to look at the number
Speaker 1: of homicides where now the left is pretending like we
Speaker 1: don't have a violence problem in this country, which is fascinating.
Speaker 1: Now we have to act like we don't have gang
Speaker 1: bangers shooting it out in inner cities all over the
Speaker 1: country on a regular basis. You know, there were I
Speaker 1: think it was eighteen people killed in Chicago. Don't quote
Speaker 1: me on the number because I just saw it a
Speaker 1: second ago as I was in the break, But eighteen
Speaker 1: people killed in Chicago over the weekend, murdered. That's one city.
Speaker 1: What do you think happens? What do you think happens
Speaker 1: when the police are gone? You think you think in
Speaker 1: Chicago that's almost all violence on the south and I
Speaker 1: believe part of the West of Chicago, but it's really
Speaker 1: on the South side. It's gang violence, mostly over drug
Speaker 1: turf and people getting caught in the crossfire of that.
Speaker 1: What do you think happens when there are no comps
Speaker 1: to tell them to stop doing that, or no comps
Speaker 1: with guns. You think that, You think that the guns
Speaker 1: that are all over the South side of Chicago disappeared.
Speaker 1: You know, it's amazing that in the cities they want
Speaker 1: to disarm the citizenry and disarm the police, meaning the
Speaker 1: only people with guns are going to be the bad guys. Oh,
Speaker 1: I don't call them bad guys, they're just misunderstood. I mean,
Speaker 1: we're really returning to that conception of criminals aren't criminals.
Speaker 1: There are fault that was prominent in liberal circles in
Speaker 1: the seventies and led to these healthscapes in major US
Speaker 1: cities that lasted for decades. We finally came out of that,
Speaker 1: you know how, policing expecting everyone to obey the law
Speaker 1: and punishing those who do not. You know, we've had
Speaker 1: in this country overall, a major decline in violence that's
Speaker 1: been going on for a couple of decades now, and
Speaker 1: we have it at the levels of policing that we
Speaker 1: currently have in the way that we're doing policing. And
Speaker 1: yet they want to try this experiment where we're just
Speaker 1: going to have effectively glorified social workers in place of cops.
Speaker 1: They really they really think have they never you know,
Speaker 1: you want to ask some of these these libs who
Speaker 1: were saying this stuff, have they never dealt with a
Speaker 1: really bad person? Have they never had someone that was
Speaker 1: on the street that was a true threat. They don't
Speaker 1: know what that's like. They've never been around that, They've
Speaker 1: never seen that. They think that everyone can be reasoned with.
Speaker 1: You know, when Keith Ellison brings up oh, when someone's
Speaker 1: you know, they call it in the NYPD an EEDP,
Speaker 1: an emotionally disturbed person. That sometimes means a crazy naked person,
Speaker 1: you know, covered in their own feces, who's running around
Speaker 1: biting people, and they send the cops. Did you want
Speaker 1: to go in there without a firearm or a baton
Speaker 1: or anything else? You just want to go in there
Speaker 1: and reason with that person? I just want to you know,
Speaker 1: who's going to sign up for the law enforcement job
Speaker 1: of I'm going to go into places? You're what You're
Speaker 1: going to serve warrants without firearms. You're gonna do highway
Speaker 1: patrol without farms? You know, where are they going to
Speaker 1: decide that this is? You're gonna have everyone just wait
Speaker 1: for the for the squat team you know, eventually people
Speaker 1: with guns are going to have to show up. Do
Speaker 1: you want to get rid of the guns with them too?
Speaker 1: I mean, I I'm almost frustrated that we even have
Speaker 1: to have a discussion about this because it's so stupid.
Speaker 1: And yet this is where they are, that this is
Speaker 1: what they've brought the conversation to. And people at CNN
Speaker 1: and New York Times who live in the richest parts
Speaker 1: of Washington, d C. In New York City who think
Speaker 1: that their doormen will keep them safe and the cops
Speaker 1: will come when they call them, even though they don't
Speaker 1: want cops for other people. And if things really get bad,
Speaker 1: you know, they'll hire private security. Their companies will hire
Speaker 1: private security at their armed guards in their you know,
Speaker 1: in their lobbies, armed guards in their newsrooms. But you
Speaker 1: don't get to have a gun and are all alone
Speaker 1: here in New York City. You're not law. It takes
Speaker 1: I have a friend or just found this up to
Speaker 1: get a long gun permit. If I wanted to get
Speaker 1: a shotgun for sporting clays, you gonna get like a
Speaker 1: twenty gage double barrel, you know that would you know
Speaker 1: how long we would take in New York City? Six
Speaker 1: to nine months. That's that's the legal process here for
Speaker 1: getting a farm. They want to get rid of guns
Speaker 1: in the hands of cops. It's look, this is all
Speaker 1: a total outrage. Um. You know, AOC one of the
Speaker 1: dumbest people in the United States Congress, not the dumbest,
Speaker 1: but one of the dumbest. You know. Now she Now
Speaker 1: they're they're hitting They're hitting the cops for not having
Speaker 1: enough Now it's not enough training. Oh you think you
Speaker 1: think cutting their funding is going to make them better
Speaker 1: trained and better equipped to handle all this stuff. Play
Speaker 1: fifteen another thing that we need to see. And I
Speaker 1: think this is something that we saw, you know, we
Speaker 1: saw it in Ferguson especially, but we've seen it across
Speaker 1: the country. The militarization of our police is enabled by
Speaker 1: the federal government. And I want everyone to draw a
Speaker 1: direct line between our police budget and our defense budget
Speaker 1: here in the United States of America, because we would
Speaker 1: not be giving local police departments who are undertrained a
Speaker 1: tank if we didn't give the military too much money
Speaker 1: to have extra damn tanks line around to begin with.
Speaker 1: Too much money spent on law enforcement and militarization of
Speaker 1: police and all this other stuff that she's saying, Look,
Speaker 1: I mean the military militarization of police. Point, I'm fine
Speaker 1: with having that discussion. They're talking about no police with guns.
Speaker 1: That's so we've gone from they can't have tanks do
Speaker 1: they can't have a side arm, and they're supposed to
Speaker 1: enforce the law in a very dangerous America's um. It's
Speaker 1: a big problem, my friends. It's something that we're going
Speaker 1: to have to deal with increasingly because they've now they've
Speaker 1: they've dug in on this position. So they're not going
Speaker 1: to abandon this one easily. And anybody who tries to
Speaker 1: challenge this, you know what, they're going to say, you're racist.
Speaker 1: Anyone who says, no, no no cops need to have firearms,
Speaker 1: I need to be able to enforce the law, you're racist.
Speaker 1: That's what it's going That's what it's going to be.
Speaker 1: So get ready for that. They're not going to try
Speaker 1: to engage on the merits and look at the data
Speaker 1: and what's going to keep people safer? What does it
Speaker 1: mean in minority communities? You know, you know where they
Speaker 1: ran a deep policing experiment recently, starting right around twenty
Speaker 1: or was it sixteen, Baltimore Baltimore cops were like, okay.
Speaker 1: After the Freddie Gray incentent in particularly, they said, we're
Speaker 1: not going to be doing a whole lot more of this,
Speaker 1: and meaning policing and murder rates shot up, and people
Speaker 1: felt unsafe, and a city that already couldn't afford to
Speaker 1: have anybody feel like it was getting worse got a
Speaker 1: whole lot worse and a whole lot less safe. So
Speaker 1: it's it's a big problem, huge And I don't know
Speaker 1: where the same people are that should you know, why
Speaker 1: can't we by the way, we should all be protesting
Speaker 1: And I want to get to this too. So at
Speaker 1: least there's no question that we're never going back to
Speaker 1: lockdown because it was it was all meant to control us,
Speaker 1: and it was a fraud. Right that social distancing is
Speaker 1: a joke because it's only something that's okay until libs
Speaker 1: think there's some important virtue signaling opportunity out there, and
Speaker 1: then it goes out the window. You're in the freedom hud.
Speaker 1: This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. God bless the
Speaker 1: Attorney General. Bill Barr is the right man for this moment.
Speaker 1: The administration has benefited so much from this guy for
Speaker 1: having somebody who is a steady hand, a brilliant mind,
Speaker 1: and does not quake, does not have his knees shaking
Speaker 1: together when the mob comes to calling the medium mob
Speaker 1: the actual mob on the streets. Here is what the
Speaker 1: Attorney General of the United States had to say in
Speaker 1: a recent interview about whether or not law enforcement is
Speaker 1: systemically racist. Nine do you believe there is systemic racism
Speaker 1: in law enforcement? I think there's racism in the United
Speaker 1: States still, but I don't think that the law enforcement
Speaker 1: system is systemically racist. I understand the distrust, however, of
Speaker 1: the African American community. Given the history in this country,
Speaker 1: I think we have to recognize that for most of
Speaker 1: our history, our institutions were explicitly racist. Since the nineteen sixties,
Speaker 1: I think we've been in a phase of reforming our
Speaker 1: institutions and making sure that they're in sync with our
Speaker 1: laws and aren't fighting a rearguard action to impose inequities.
Speaker 1: And you think that's working. I think the reform is
Speaker 1: a difficult task, but I think it is working and
Speaker 1: progress has been made. I think one of the best
Speaker 1: examples is the military. The military used to be explicitly
Speaker 1: racist institution and now I think it's in the vanguard
Speaker 1: of bringing the races together and providing equal opportunity. I
Speaker 1: think law enforcement has been going through the same guy
Speaker 1: is eloquent. He understands the racial inequities of the past
Speaker 1: and even stretching all the way into the nineteen sixties,
Speaker 1: and as a function of law and government, the racism
Speaker 1: that was enshrined in law. He's not. He's not in
Speaker 1: any way, you know, minimizing that or dismissing it or
Speaker 1: anything else. But he's also saying, well, we have to
Speaker 1: look at where we are now, not where we were
Speaker 1: fifty or sixty years ago. And to say that law
Speaker 1: enforcement is systemically racist, someone would have to ask the
Speaker 1: question in what ways and how and ask and ask
Speaker 1: for real answers about this. You know, why is law
Speaker 1: enforcement systemic? You're racist? I keep hearing this repeated all
Speaker 1: the time, and he says, no, he doesn't think law
Speaker 1: how is it systemically racist? We have on criminal justice
Speaker 1: matters laws that are all across the board supposed to
Speaker 1: be race neutral. We have a jury of our peers
Speaker 1: convicting us in criminal cases cops. Do we have any
Speaker 1: evidence that cops are Remember, it's systemic systemic does not
Speaker 1: mean occasional or aberrant or once in a while. It
Speaker 1: means this is how it's set up. And it said,
Speaker 1: this is what the system produces on purpose, this is
Speaker 1: what the system is doing. Systemic racism. How they never
Speaker 1: answer that. They just repeat the systemic racism point, as
Speaker 1: if that just saying it enough will somehow fix it
Speaker 1: or somehow make anything better. Here we have Bill bar
Speaker 1: talking about the Lafayette Square protest that got so much
Speaker 1: attention from the media last week. That was the biggest
Speaker 1: While cities were burning and neighborhoods were getting their windows
Speaker 1: shattered and rocks thrown through them and all this stuff,
Speaker 1: the biggest problem in the country was that a protest
Speaker 1: was moved using non lethal measures near Lafayette Park, which
Speaker 1: is right next to the White House. And oh, who
Speaker 1: was there tear gas or was it just pepper spray
Speaker 1: or well, you know, all this stuff, as if that
Speaker 1: was a single most important thing to happen in the
Speaker 1: whole country. We kept hearing that it was a peaceful protest.
Speaker 1: Here's the Attorney General, whom I've come to see as
Speaker 1: a straight shooter and a guy who we have no
Speaker 1: reason to not believe based on everything I know. Oh
Speaker 1: my gods, the lives are always a liary works for
Speaker 1: Trunk because they're psychos. But here's what he says about
Speaker 1: whether this was a peaceful protest play clips seventeen. At
Speaker 1: that point, it was not to respond Monday. You're saying
Speaker 1: they were projects. They were as I'm saying. Three of
Speaker 1: my colleagues were there. They did not see projectiles being thrown.
Speaker 1: I was there. I was there. They were thrown. I
Speaker 1: saw them thrown. And you believe that what the Hercules
Speaker 1: did using tear gas and projectiles was appropriate. Here's what
Speaker 1: the media is missing. This was not an operation to
Speaker 1: respond to that particular crowd. It was an operation to
Speaker 1: move the perimeter one block. And the methods they used
Speaker 1: you think were appropriate when they met resistance, Yes, they
Speaker 1: announced three times, they didn't move. By the way, there
Speaker 1: was no cheer gas used. The tear gas was used
Speaker 1: Sunday when they had to clear Age Street to allow
Speaker 1: the fire department to come in too save Saint John's Church, Dax.
Speaker 1: When tear gas was used, they were chemical irritants a partner,
Speaker 1: they were non chemical irritanst Pepter spray is not a chemicals.
Speaker 1: It's not chemical peppers. Us. It's good to get some
Speaker 1: facts out there, isn't it. Notice how Margaret Brennan, another
Speaker 1: lib journal fraud works for CBS. Oh, I'm just bringing
Speaker 1: you the facts, but I look very serious when I do.
Speaker 1: It's a lib. I can tell you every I can
Speaker 1: tell you everything. She believes, everything she thinks. I could
Speaker 1: sit down and just check off a list of all
Speaker 1: of it. It's all the classic this is what you
Speaker 1: think if you're going to be a journalist and have
Speaker 1: the other journalists clapping for you. Oh, you're so smart, obvious, right,
Speaker 1: classic lib journal who doesn't even realize she's a lib.
Speaker 1: She just thinks that, Oh this is what smart people think. Oh, okay,
Speaker 1: good luck with that one. The Attorney General though, getting
Speaker 1: out some truth is a good thing, and then he
Speaker 1: spoke on this issue. We'll talk about what the New
Speaker 1: York Times has done and just the moment here, but
Speaker 1: here he talked about law enforcement and the possibility of
Speaker 1: having to call in troops. He says, look, if we
Speaker 1: got it, we got to play eight. Well, it depends
Speaker 1: on the circumstances. I was involved in the LA riots
Speaker 1: and the Rodney King matter. We tried to use non
Speaker 1: military forces. I sent two thousand federal law enforcement officers
Speaker 1: out there in one day, but it was overwhelming and
Speaker 1: the National Guard couldn't handle it. And Governor Pete Wilson
Speaker 1: asked for federal troops. And he asked for it. Then, yes,
Speaker 1: that's a key distinction. He approved these federal troops. But
Speaker 1: those troops were on standby as well. Because I think
Speaker 1: a number of people would be surprised to hear and
Speaker 1: it's been reported that you opposed sending an active duty
Speaker 1: troops on principle. You're saying you would support it as
Speaker 1: a last resort, of course, of course as a last
Speaker 1: We're like, well, what's the alternative? Oh yeah, did defund
Speaker 1: the cops, defund the military. No guns for anybody except
Speaker 1: the bad guys, the lot of the rioters, the looters,
Speaker 1: and the media. While they're just all they're thinking about is,
Speaker 1: you know, how they can get into the fanciest club
Speaker 1: in the Hamptons and out in Bethesda. You know, make
Speaker 1: sure that the right set of people likes them. They're
Speaker 1: pretending like they're okay with all of this. Thanks for
Speaker 1: listening to the Busts and Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe
Speaker 1: on Apple Podcasts, the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get
Speaker 1: your podcasts. Never again will I be bullied, nor should
Speaker 1: any of us be bullied into exchanging all of our
Speaker 1: liberties based on the word of public health experts. How
Speaker 1: many major conferences? How many people you see going on
Speaker 1: TV the very same public health experts who are lecturing
Speaker 1: us endlessly socially distanced, wear a mask, wash your hands,
Speaker 1: or else people are dying because of you. How many
Speaker 1: of them have you seen in the aftermath of massive
Speaker 1: unsocially distant or socially undistanced Sorry, I guess that works
Speaker 1: better protests over the weekend calling out what we were
Speaker 1: told in the case of Georgia reopening was an experiment
Speaker 1: in mass death. You know what you're going to find
Speaker 1: out from these huge protests. It's not going to be
Speaker 1: a big surge and infections from them. It's not going
Speaker 1: to happen because outdoor transmission is almost impossible, especially in
Speaker 1: this weather, and young people who are outdoors wearing masks
Speaker 1: are being silly. There's no reason. There's no reason for this.
Speaker 1: And in case you think, oh buck, what are you saying?
Speaker 1: Asymptomatic coronavirus patients aren't spreading most new infections. According to
Speaker 1: the World Health Organization. This is a way of saying,
Speaker 1: now they're doing contract contact tracing, they're contracted to contact trace.
Speaker 1: Now that they're actually looking into this, you know what,
Speaker 1: they're finding out that people who don't have symptoms don't
Speaker 1: really spread this thing. It is people who just like
Speaker 1: other coronaviruses which do cause the common cold, the common
Speaker 1: cold is a coronavirus, or there's the strains of common
Speaker 1: strains of coronavirus cause what we think of as the cold.
Speaker 1: This is not a cold. I'm not saying that. But
Speaker 1: the same way that you know you're sick and you
Speaker 1: spread it to people, or you spread it right before
Speaker 1: you get sick. That's how this, according to the World
Speaker 1: Health Organization, he's supposed to work. Now you might say, buck,
Speaker 1: you say the who gets it wrong on things? Yeah,
Speaker 1: they got it wrong on things when they had no
Speaker 1: data and China is pushing them around to say things
Speaker 1: that weren't true. And now there's actually a lot of
Speaker 1: data that they can look at. It's not that hard
Speaker 1: to look at the facts and the figures when you
Speaker 1: have them and say, okay, I guess this is a situation,
Speaker 1: and here, this is a piece on CNBC. If you're asymptomatic,
Speaker 1: you're very unlikely to spread this. Oh oh gosh, So
Speaker 1: why are we all going around with masks on? I'm
Speaker 1: not sick. I'm not giving anybody coronavirus. It's absurd, it's stupid.
Speaker 1: Why am I going around with a mask on all
Speaker 1: the time? Oh, because everyone's so scared. Yeah, they made
Speaker 1: us so scared because they told us, Oh, if you
Speaker 1: get coronavirus, you're you know, your face is gonna fall
Speaker 1: off and everybody's gonna die and it's gonna be the
Speaker 1: Spanish and fluenza all over again. And no, it's not true,
Speaker 1: it's not true. And where where's doctor Fauci? I want
Speaker 1: Fauci on TV saying, look, everybody to mitigation efforts out
Speaker 1: outdoor mask wearing is dumb, and you don't want to
Speaker 1: be a dumb ask You don't have to wear a
Speaker 1: mask outdoors. It's stupid. Also, if you're young and healthy,
Speaker 1: you know, you really don't have to worry about this.
Speaker 1: And it looks like the WHL is saying you can't
Speaker 1: even spread it really unless you're sick, So basically sick
Speaker 1: people wear masks. That should be the rule. Sick people
Speaker 1: who have to go out in public wear a mask.
Speaker 1: Everybody else no mask. That's it. That is a fact
Speaker 1: and reality based assessment of where we are. But you're
Speaker 1: not saying that, are you. Oh no, you still have
Speaker 1: some people. Oh my gosh. Any day now the cases
Speaker 1: are going to spike. And this is the part of
Speaker 1: this that drives me the and saying in a New
Speaker 1: York city is in its phase one of reopening, let's
Speaker 1: go a cuomo wants credit for reopening. What do I
Speaker 1: mean by reopening? I mean that now a small segment
Speaker 1: of business in New York will be allowed to start
Speaker 1: having business even if there's no customers. How they're gonna
Speaker 1: stand in business, I'm not clear on how they will
Speaker 1: stay in bit. This is where we are in phase one.
Speaker 1: Now we should be in phase reopen. We should be
Speaker 1: people go about their lives. This is madness, This is madness.
Speaker 1: What has been done? Now? Now I'm telling you what
Speaker 1: the data says. Outdoor transmission basically can happen asymptomatic transmission?
Speaker 1: And now want to say basically can highly highly highly unlikely?
Speaker 1: Do we live our lives in fear? Of the highly highly,
Speaker 1: highly unlikely all the time. This does bring us back
Speaker 1: the conversation you get in a car, you could die.
Speaker 1: You're gonna get a car today, probably, or at least
Speaker 1: a lot of you will. But you could die. It's true.
Speaker 1: And can I ever prove it? Can I ever tell
Speaker 1: you for sure? Or you wouldn't die if you get
Speaker 1: a car. No, but it's a risk you're willing to take.
Speaker 1: I could get an elevated elevator, the you know, the
Speaker 1: elevator could just crash the bottom floor, and you know
Speaker 1: that's it risk I'm willing to take. The coronavirus risk
Speaker 1: were completely exaggerated, inflated, misunderstood, We misallocated resources, wrong decision
Speaker 1: after wrong decision from the authorities, from the people in
Speaker 1: the public health positions. And I'm never I'm never going
Speaker 1: to go back to thinking that when it comes to
Speaker 1: saving lives, people in the medical profession would put politics aside. No,
Speaker 1: oh no, no, all these doctors and nurses not are
Speaker 1: now Black lives matter, you know, chanting down the street
Speaker 1: and everything else. Wait, I thought that lives just mattered
Speaker 1: when you're in the medical profession. I thought that the
Speaker 1: politics of political movements wouldn't really sway you one way
Speaker 1: or the other. Eye. I guess I was being naive.
Speaker 1: I guess they can't help themselves. You know, they're they're
Speaker 1: people too, right, Virtue staging feels good. Oh man, yeah,
Speaker 1: that's right. Put up that hashtag, black out your Instagram.
Speaker 1: Do all these things that people are doing. Oh, that's right.
Speaker 1: They're they're curing racism with this, said the morons. I
Speaker 1: know this is it's crazy. But the coronavirus thing, now
Speaker 1: we've moved past. And this is also I think part
Speaker 1: of the mentality of many of the people that are
Speaker 1: pulling the strings and pushing for this behind the scenes
Speaker 1: on the left. We're not allowed to do an after
Speaker 1: action report of these democrats. States that have had the
Speaker 1: most extreme lockdowns. They've ruined their economies, They've put the
Speaker 1: United States into a recession. They've done all of this
Speaker 1: for no benefit. They did not have to do this.
Speaker 1: They chose to do this, and it was the wrong
Speaker 1: thing to do. But no, they'd rather go and and
Speaker 1: wage their anti fascist struggle, which now includes you know
Speaker 1: in Europe they're protesting, oh, huge protests. And by the way,
Speaker 1: I thought they were worried about the disease there too.
Speaker 1: I thought COVID nineteen was a big social sincing, a
Speaker 1: big threat. If it's about policing in Minneapolis and how
Speaker 1: they need to defund defund the police in Minneapolis, why
Speaker 1: are people in London and Amsterdam gathering in huge numbers
Speaker 1: to know this is about leftism. It's about feel good
Speaker 1: politics man, one world government, socialism, statesm piled on top
Speaker 1: of each other. It's about a massive global infusion of
Speaker 1: collectivism and people just sitting around and being all about
Speaker 1: their white guilt and oh my gosh, white privilege just
Speaker 1: all apologized for it. There's this video going around over
Speaker 1: the weekend of a bunch of white white people, who are,
Speaker 1: you know, washing defeat of black pastors as a form
Speaker 1: of public penance for white guilt and the sins of
Speaker 1: white people. I'm never going to apologize for being white.
Speaker 1: I was born this way. It has nothing to do
Speaker 1: with my character, my mentality, anything else. This is just
Speaker 1: how I was born, the same way that it would
Speaker 1: be immoral for me to judge somebody else by their
Speaker 1: skin color, the same way that it would be a
Speaker 1: logical and moral fallacy to see someone's skin color and
Speaker 1: make any inference or distinction about who they are as
Speaker 1: a person or their worth. I do not accept that
Speaker 1: I have any guilt or less worth because of my
Speaker 1: skin color, nor do I think that I have any
Speaker 1: advantage or in any way am considered superior to anyone
Speaker 1: because of skin color. This is the only way to
Speaker 1: stay morally and ethically consistent on this matter. By the way,
Speaker 1: the things that other people are telling you about how oh,
Speaker 1: no you're white privileges, No, no, no. We are morally
Speaker 1: culpable for actions, for decisions that we make as human beings.
Speaker 1: We are not culpable for what other people in other
Speaker 1: times or other places have done. But this is going
Speaker 1: to be a fight, make no mistake about it. And
Speaker 1: the anti fascists who are defacing Churchill statues in London
Speaker 1: without any irony whatsoever and putting up on a statue
Speaker 1: of the founder of the modern of modern policing in
Speaker 1: the UK. Remember, US policing is largely taken from the
Speaker 1: Hey policing. In fact, our intelligence community as well was
Speaker 1: built off of a UK model with the Secret Intelligence
Speaker 1: Service and m I five and m I six. But
Speaker 1: policing is something we've also taken culturally and legally speaking
Speaker 1: from the UK and the founder of modern modern policing,
Speaker 1: his statue was defaced and they put a I mean,
Speaker 1: I just you can't imagine this stuff. They put a
Speaker 1: hammer and sickle on the statue and now I just
Speaker 1: got to tell people there's there's no better proof you
Speaker 1: can have. Sir Robert Peel, by the way, in eighteen
Speaker 1: twenty nine, Sir Robert Peel established the London Metropolitan Police Force.
Speaker 1: He is known as the father of modern policing. If
Speaker 1: you think that you are anti police brutality and violence
Speaker 1: and you are painting, as they did over the weekend
Speaker 1: in the UK the symbol of the Soviet Union the
Speaker 1: hammer and sickle on a statue. If you think you're
Speaker 1: opposed to rough policing, you really don't know anything about
Speaker 1: the Soviet Union. If you don't like aggressive policing, the
Speaker 1: Soviet Union was really not your thing. Where it was
Speaker 1: a true police state where officers of the state police
Speaker 1: in their different forms could come and take you from
Speaker 1: your home in the middle of the night with no charges,
Speaker 1: no due process, hold you in a cell, torture you,
Speaker 1: rape you, beat you, and then send you to Siberia
Speaker 1: or take you for summary execution, send you to the gulag,
Speaker 1: or just take you out back and put a bullet
Speaker 1: in your skull. That was the Soviet Union's version of
Speaker 1: police for millions and millions and millions of victims, tens
Speaker 1: of millions. But people think that they're anti police violence
Speaker 1: and they're painting the hammer and cyclo on things. It
Speaker 1: is not possible to be more wrong and more ignorant
Speaker 1: than this left wing movement. It's impossible. Whatever the exact
Speaker 1: opposite of the truth is, they're able to how find that, Yes,
Speaker 1: they represent Soviet style policing. That's what we need communist states.
Speaker 1: They've really figured out policing. Well, they know nothing, it
Speaker 1: seems of history, or they figure that they can just
Speaker 1: rewrite it with their emotions. It doesn't matter. They feel
Speaker 1: a certain way about che Guvara, they feel a certain
Speaker 1: way about the Soviet Union, and that's all that matters
Speaker 1: to them. You're in the Freedom Hut. This is the
Speaker 1: Buck Sexton Show podcast. Yeah, I don't. I don't remember
Speaker 1: all the woke snappers at the New York Times rising
Speaker 1: up in arms or whenever they published the Taliban OpEd
Speaker 1: just a few months ago. It just goes to show
Speaker 1: you the more rots inside some of our media and
Speaker 1: academic institutions, that they don't get outraged about the Taliban,
Speaker 1: but they do get outraged about conservative opinion. I mean,
Speaker 1: that's the best comparison you could ever ever find. Right.
Speaker 1: They will they will literally publish, as they did an
Speaker 1: op ed by the Taliban in the New York Times.
Speaker 1: That's okay, but they will not publish without an uproar
Speaker 1: and demands that heads roll in uproar that a sitting
Speaker 1: US Senator would write an editorial that was entirely not
Speaker 1: only within the scope of the US political discourse, but
Speaker 1: is supported by a whose position is supported by a
Speaker 1: strong majority of the American people. Taliban, totally fine. New
Speaker 1: York Times wants to published that. Achmandena Jod totally fine.
Speaker 1: New York Times will publish that. I mean, Achmendena Jod,
Speaker 1: I'll never forget. It was a great moment because the
Speaker 1: left or such a bunch of childish frauds. It's just
Speaker 1: full of it. And I mean the elites at the
Speaker 1: highest level, the university professors, the TV news anchors, the
Speaker 1: CEOs of lib leaning corporations. Corporate America is now left
Speaker 1: dominated by the ways dominated by libs all over the place.
Speaker 1: But people, old corporations are right wing. Big business loves
Speaker 1: big government. Don't ever forget that. Don't ever that they
Speaker 1: hate small business because every small business is an act
Speaker 1: of personal an act of individual and family autonomy in
Speaker 1: the market. They hate that. They want it to all
Speaker 1: be wrapped up in big corporations that they can control,
Speaker 1: and that then that can have you know, hr departments
Speaker 1: that run those things like the Stasi. Did you say
Speaker 1: that only women can menstruate? JK. Rowling, most wealthy author
Speaker 1: and history, gotten big trouble over the weekend because she's like, yeah,
Speaker 1: men can't get their periods. Guys, we need to stop this.
Speaker 1: I'll tell you what the okay, the exact quote where
Speaker 1: it was it, The exact quote was, if sex isn't real,
Speaker 1: there's no same sex attraction. If sex isn't real, the
Speaker 1: lived reality of women globally is erased. I know and
Speaker 1: love trans people, but erasing the concept of sex removes
Speaker 1: the ability of many to meaningfully discuss their lives. It
Speaker 1: isn't hate to speak the truth. It is hate to
Speaker 1: speak the truth. According to the woke miss Rowling, maybe
Speaker 1: come on over to conservatism. Where intellectual pursuit is real
Speaker 1: and the exchange of ideas is still welcome. Don't join
Speaker 1: the woke mob, the cultish, brainwashed libs. You don't want
Speaker 1: to be a part of that team. I guess she does.
Speaker 1: They throw better cocktail parties. It's easier too, You can
Speaker 1: get away with more. You know. All you have to
Speaker 1: do is obey the cult, and you've got a whole
Speaker 1: army that has your back on all matters, social and political,
Speaker 1: and economic and professional. It's so much easier to be
Speaker 1: a leftist, especially in a city. Oh man, if I
Speaker 1: was willing to be a turncoat trader like a lot
Speaker 1: of people who used to be on the right who
Speaker 1: now switched over at over, at MSNBC and other places,
Speaker 1: you get these never trumpers. They're just turncoats. They're just
Speaker 1: traders to what they said. They believe what they said.
Speaker 1: They spent their adult lives fighting for it. Just frauds, fakes, phonies.
Speaker 1: But take your aling made the mistake. He can't, can't,
Speaker 1: she says, Oh no, the truth is not hate. The
Speaker 1: truth is hate. Now that's how they've defined it. Now,
Speaker 1: you speak the truth of it upsets people, if it
Speaker 1: triggers them Oh, my gosh, triggered. So triggered. Tom Cotton
Speaker 1: sending the troops editorial means that James Bennett, who was
Speaker 1: the editor of the op ed page of the New
Speaker 1: York Times, a hallowed position in lib establishment media. James
Speaker 1: Bennett is out. He's out. How to resign? They cost
Speaker 1: this guy his job. Staffers within the New York Times
Speaker 1: cost this guy his job. Yeah, that's right, because he
Speaker 1: published an editorial. Remember, the purpose of an op ed
Speaker 1: is to get diverse viewpoints. The purpose of publishing Tom
Speaker 1: Cotton on this could not have been any more clear.
Speaker 1: But people in the Times came up with a left
Speaker 1: wing construct of this. Is he Tom Cotton? This is
Speaker 1: what they said is advocating violence against black New York
Speaker 1: Times staffers. Oh that sounds horrifying, right, you can't. I mean,
Speaker 1: that's too disgusting and terrible. So the only problem is
Speaker 1: it's not true. Is not what he did, It's not
Speaker 1: reality doesn't matter. To come up with a narrative, and
Speaker 1: this is what they do with all these things. Come
Speaker 1: up with a narrative and then the emotion drives the
Speaker 1: rest of it. The facts cannot be allowed to get
Speaker 1: in the way of an important political narrative for the left.
Speaker 1: And then that brings me to that brings me to
Speaker 1: the Philadelphia Inquirer. Also, somebody's out there another editor I for.
Speaker 1: He's a long time editor, not the editor in chief,
Speaker 1: but a senior editor of the Philadelphia Inquirer. Of the weekend,
Speaker 1: not woke enough, Not Woke enough, NPR is putting out
Speaker 1: a put out a piece over the weekend about how
Speaker 1: you need to decolonize your bookshelf. And now now we're
Speaker 1: back to this too, all the things on the left right.
Speaker 1: It started out with one act of violence against a
Speaker 1: black man in Minneapolis that was very emotionally charged and
Speaker 1: very upsetting and very wrong. It starts with that, where
Speaker 1: there's universal moral agreement, and then that is used as
Speaker 1: leverage to get you to try to agree to all
Speaker 1: this other left wing stuff that has nothing to do
Speaker 1: with that. Decolonize your bookshelf. Can they tell them who
Speaker 1: are the approved great authors? Who are the approved non
Speaker 1: white male great authors that I'm supposed to be reading
Speaker 1: now because I want to quote decolonize my bookshelf. And
Speaker 1: when they tell me this, just the same way that
Speaker 1: I'm willing to say protesters are allowed to have their
Speaker 1: voice and have their say. I'm allowed to say it's
Speaker 1: stupid and that's meaningless, and it's going to hurt people
Speaker 1: what they're advocating for because it is okay, give me
Speaker 1: the list of the non white male authors, and then
Speaker 1: I reserve the right to look at this and say,
Speaker 1: not a great book, not a great all. You know
Speaker 1: some some yes, some no, right, But I'm not just
Speaker 1: gonna take a list. First of All'm not going to
Speaker 1: decolonize my bookhelf. But I'm not going to just accept
Speaker 1: that they're putting forward people. Oh, you know Shakespeare, Yeah
Speaker 1: he's good, but he's you know, he's an old white guys.
Speaker 1: It's not so good. Let's put someone else forward. I mean,
Speaker 1: we're going to celebrate, you know, I'm sorry, who is
Speaker 1: the author? Who is the non white male author that
Speaker 1: is being not read enough in schools? That would be
Speaker 1: a game changer for our perception. I mean, I asked
Speaker 1: the question, honestly, who. I mean. I've read I've read Richard, right,
Speaker 1: I've read some of the great celebrate but you know,
Speaker 1: you'll notice that Frederick Douglas does not get the celebration
Speaker 1: on the left that he should and or really a
Speaker 1: cry to argue across the board. Frederick Douglas was a
Speaker 1: true genius in his way. But there are these other
Speaker 1: authors that are far left who put out crap. But
Speaker 1: they're non white, they're far left, and then we're told, oh,
Speaker 1: you've got to read this. No. Thanks for listening to
Speaker 1: The Bus Sesson Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts,
Speaker 1: the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get your podcasts. Rock
Speaker 1: and roll, Fellow Patriots, we made our score up to eleven.
Speaker 1: It's time for roll call. It is time for the
Speaker 1: Roll Call Facebook dot com slash buck Sexton. First, we
Speaker 1: want to check in on our buddy, producer Mark, Producer Mark.
Speaker 1: How is your weekend? Quiet? Yeah, okay, any anything to
Speaker 1: anything noteworthy? We'll watch the rest of Fuller House with
Speaker 1: the wife. It's wasn't not good. Yeah, it doesn't sound
Speaker 1: like it was very good. Yeah, I mean it's very
Speaker 1: you know, gonna have Aunt Bucky aunt Becky, not Bucky
Speaker 1: Aunt Becky because she's in the big house. Yes, they
Speaker 1: explained her absence that she was in Nebraska helping her mother. Ah, no,
Speaker 1: aunt Becky. Oh man, what a shave? What a shave? Sorry,
Speaker 1: look I was I was Team Man Becky. I mean,
Speaker 1: I didn't want to go to prisoner, but I gotta
Speaker 1: say it's who would have thought that we'd be in
Speaker 1: this situation right now? Yeah, to get any anyting food,
Speaker 1: anything else happened over the weekend. That's the we're telling
Speaker 1: the folks, and nothing really know what I'm saying. I
Speaker 1: watched I watched Penny Dreadful City of Angels, and I
Speaker 1: got about fifteen minutes into it. It is horrible. It
Speaker 1: is so bad. I just couldn't even get through it
Speaker 1: because Penny Dreadful, the original show, which I think was
Speaker 1: a showtime show, was actually quite good for what it
Speaker 1: was and very entertaining. And this show is horrible and
Speaker 1: it makes me mad because it has nothing to do
Speaker 1: with with the other show. But they just knew that
Speaker 1: they had a good show, so it's like they tried
Speaker 1: to connect it when it has. You remember when Tommy
Speaker 1: Lee Jones was in The Fugitive and which was a
Speaker 1: great movie, and then they made like a Wesley Snipes
Speaker 1: The Fugitive like something else. But it really is like
Speaker 1: a different movie, different you know what I'm saying. It's
Speaker 1: like the Men in Black movie without Will Smith. Yeah,
Speaker 1: well kind of at least that's the same story like this, say,
Speaker 1: is this storyline is not even that, it's like nothing,
Speaker 1: you know, it's a little bit like more more like
Speaker 1: that True Detective show, which the first season was great
Speaker 1: and then the second season was unwatchable garbage, and then
Speaker 1: they really have nothing. There's a basic premise that's similar
Speaker 1: of two cops in a place. Other than that, it's
Speaker 1: totally different. Yes, I've heard good things about the first
Speaker 1: season and everyone says to stop, So why do I
Speaker 1: bother watching it? Have you seen the first season? No?
Speaker 1: Oh dude, dude, producer Mark, you got to add that
Speaker 1: one to the list, man, But why am I going
Speaker 1: to watch it? If I know the second season stinks
Speaker 1: because because it's a standalone, so you're just watching one season.
Speaker 1: I'm sure that's amazing. So it's like I'm watching nothing
Speaker 1: to do with the first season. So it's like, you know,
Speaker 1: I'm trying to think of a better, you know, something
Speaker 1: like this where they kind of go off and it's
Speaker 1: not similar at all. But season nine of Scrubs, Speed
Speaker 1: one and Speed two, the movies Speed one amazing. Prucer
Speaker 1: Nick is calling it an anthology. Yeah, maybe that's the
Speaker 1: way to think about it. I don't know, anyway, it
Speaker 1: was really, it was really I got the snow Princess
Speaker 1: to lock in and try to watch someone with me,
Speaker 1: and she was like, this is what we get when
Speaker 1: we listen to you. Because I also convinced her last
Speaker 1: weekend because I'm sick of watching this same stuff, you know,
Speaker 1: and so I want to expend our horizons. So I
Speaker 1: got her to watch Grim, which is like Grimm's fairy
Speaker 1: Tale in a modern detective setting. Very bad, trash, trash
Speaker 1: with crappy production values. Anyway, I wish I had something
Speaker 1: good to Oh. I mean, the last dance is amazing,
Speaker 1: but I ripped through it. Now I'm done. Now what
Speaker 1: do I do? I mean, find another sports documentary and
Speaker 1: I suppose yeah, all right, roll call time, and plus
Speaker 1: we will do so I think Mark and I have
Speaker 1: decided that we'll pick the best voicemails and it'll be
Speaker 1: it'll be like a Friday thing, right, Mark, We'll do
Speaker 1: a segment to voted to voicemails on Friday, assuming we
Speaker 1: have enough. That's better keep my blood pressure as low
Speaker 1: as puss. Yeah, yeah, so so, so you got to
Speaker 1: give a good so now, really ask to listen in
Speaker 1: for the you know, really keep it to forty five
Speaker 1: seconds or less and either get ask a question or
Speaker 1: just share your thoughts with the team and tell us
Speaker 1: we know if you don't mind how you listen, where
Speaker 1: you're calling from, if you're comfortable sharing that. So that's
Speaker 1: the way to do it. Maybe give us your name,
Speaker 1: even if it's not a real name. Yeah, give us
Speaker 1: on name. At least you can call on in a
Speaker 1: fake name if you want, be like my name is.
Speaker 1: Buck calls his girlfriend snow Princess on the air for
Speaker 1: crying out a lot. I mean, yeah, exactly. Her name
Speaker 1: on her driver's license is not snow Princess, so in
Speaker 1: case it's not, it probably should be. Though. It's imagine
Speaker 1: if you go to the DMV and ask that to
Speaker 1: be her name, Like, what would they even say? I
Speaker 1: don't think they could if you had the legal grounds
Speaker 1: for it. Don't think the DMV employees no offense, but
Speaker 1: they just kind of rubber stamp stuff. I don't think
Speaker 1: they're gonna take any offense to that. Um, So let
Speaker 1: us move, shall we. Douglas first up here? Buck, the
Speaker 1: Minneapolis Police Force should stay home, stay safe for a
Speaker 1: week just to see how that would work going forward.
Speaker 1: You know, I'm just gonna say this, folks. I understand
Speaker 1: the the impetus to let let the cities burn themselves
Speaker 1: down and burn them but you gotta remember for those
Speaker 1: of us who are stuck here in the places, you know,
Speaker 1: and I get it, you're like, democrats should have to
Speaker 1: live with the decisions they're making, and then everybody will understand.
Speaker 1: And you know, this is the laboratory of democracy playing out.
Speaker 1: But just think about the rest of us, Okay, think
Speaker 1: about what it means when these cities become lawless, and
Speaker 1: who's hurt by it, and how terrible it is. This
Speaker 1: is a price that's too highs. This is not a
Speaker 1: lesson we should have to learn. We already learned it
Speaker 1: in American cities through the seventies and into the eighties
Speaker 1: into the early nineties. We've already learned this. The hands
Speaker 1: off police are the bad guys. Let things happen, social
Speaker 1: workers will fix it up. Mentality, it does not do
Speaker 1: well for us, It doesn't do well for society for anyone.
Speaker 1: And in places you know, I think in Los Angeles
Speaker 1: County there's a million registered Republicans in New York. There
Speaker 1: there's about a million Republicans, So just remember there's a
Speaker 1: lot of people who aren't in favor. And then there's
Speaker 1: some Democrats who are sane enough did not want this stuff.
Speaker 1: And then there's the we should just protect people from
Speaker 1: their stupid ideas, even if they don't realize they're stupid,
Speaker 1: which means that all the Libs that are like no police,
Speaker 1: we still want them to have police, Yes we do.
Speaker 1: We still want them to be safe too. But I
Speaker 1: hear you, Douglas. Thanks for writing in. Zach Buck longtime
Speaker 1: listener here. I've been listening since my junior year of
Speaker 1: high school. Wow, and I just graduated from college. Your
Speaker 1: show has been great over the past six years. Well, Zach,
Speaker 1: thank you so much. I feel like Zach's grown up
Speaker 1: with us. I spoke to a friend today who was
Speaker 1: a doctoral student from Saudi Arabia about the protesting and rioting.
Speaker 1: It was interesting to hear a perspective that wasn't influenced
Speaker 1: by their position in American politics. He concurred with everything
Speaker 1: you've said and agreed that the left has co opted
Speaker 1: this from protests against unjust police killing to an anti
Speaker 1: police and anti Trump movement. It was refreshing for me
Speaker 1: to hear an outside perspective to make sure that I'm
Speaker 1: not going crazy since all my friends from college in
Speaker 1: high school are posting the black squares on Instagram and
Speaker 1: talking about how Trump is a dictator as always shields.
Speaker 1: I hey, Zach, honor to have you the freedom? Hup
Speaker 1: man young team buck in the house. We love it.
Speaker 1: And yeah, it's for everyone. I know. It's so much
Speaker 1: cooler now, it's so much more. That's what I think
Speaker 1: is so funny. People act like putting the black square
Speaker 1: on your Instagram and doing this solidarity social media stuff. Yeah, man,
Speaker 1: I'm being brave. No, this is what everyone's telling you
Speaker 1: to do. It's not It's not brave. This is this
Speaker 1: is the OPM. This is what you know. I don't
Speaker 1: know want else to say. It's not brave. Everyone's doing
Speaker 1: this and you get nothing but high fives and everyone
Speaker 1: telling you how wonderful you are when you do this.
Speaker 1: That's not brave. That's easy, so Zach to be as
Speaker 1: you are a free thinker who appreciates real discourse, real thought,
Speaker 1: intellectual rigor. That's a much better place. But it's going
Speaker 1: to be lonely sometimes, man, I'm just gonna tell you,
Speaker 1: it's why he was going to come back to the Hut,
Speaker 1: because you know, we've got your back here. But in
Speaker 1: the rest of the world, you know. I look, I've
Speaker 1: told you before my previous life as a single guy,
Speaker 1: I've had people I've gotten phone numbers from women when
Speaker 1: I was single, you know, earlier in my time, phone
Speaker 1: numbers from women and had them canceled dates when they
Speaker 1: found out what I think about a different political issue
Speaker 1: because of what's on the internet. Yeah, that's happened before.
Speaker 1: Excuse me. But like, I totally heard what you said
Speaker 1: about climate change, and I just don't think it'll work.
Speaker 1: I'm like, fine, that's great. No cycle libs. I've learned.
Speaker 1: I've learned my lesson. No cycle lives. You don't want
Speaker 1: them in your life. You're on date them, you're on
Speaker 1: deal with them. It's a bad idea. But Zach Gobless
Speaker 1: shield time man. Good to have you on the team,
Speaker 1: Jared buck On the one hand, the left says that
Speaker 1: police are evil and can't be trusted. On the other
Speaker 1: they say you don't need a gun to protect yourself,
Speaker 1: but should call the police. So which is it? Well,
Speaker 1: Jared What they would really say, or what the logic
Speaker 1: of their position is, is that you, my friend, if
Speaker 1: you are disarmed and then the police are defunded, you
Speaker 1: are a necessary casualty if someone breaks into your home
Speaker 1: and attacks you, of the change that they seek to create.
Speaker 1: Don't you understand, You know, to make an omelet, you
Speaker 1: got to break a few eggs. My man, you know
Speaker 1: that they view this all as of course, there's a cost.
Speaker 1: Of course, this isn't going to be risk free. Of
Speaker 1: course they're ah, but they're not going to be the
Speaker 1: ones who pay the price. The ones advocating for this,
Speaker 1: they will have protection, they have wealth, they will be secure.
Speaker 1: It is the people who rely on law enforcement to
Speaker 1: protect them, particularly in dangerous communities. All the dangerous communities
Speaker 1: will be spreading out. There'll be more and more dangerous
Speaker 1: communities if you defund police. So just remember that I
Speaker 1: think there has been this perception for a while that
Speaker 1: all it will take is a spike in violent crime
Speaker 1: in some area for everyone who's advocating for less police
Speaker 1: presence or to realize what about No, they won't realize though.
Speaker 1: Even the ones that are paying attention to the numbers
Speaker 1: will say, well, but at least we don't have more
Speaker 1: police violence. Yeah, there's been more murders, more people dead,
Speaker 1: more people raped, more people who have had their lives
Speaker 1: ruined by criminals. But we're approaching the society we want
Speaker 1: now where there's less of a sense of over policing
Speaker 1: of minority communities, and so that's a worthwhile trade off,
Speaker 1: That is what the left will say. So don't think
Speaker 1: that spiking crime, even if they defund police, will make
Speaker 1: them change their minds. No, no, do you think that
Speaker 1: In the Soviet Union the true believers of the Communist
Speaker 1: Party looked at the repression and the famines and the
Speaker 1: dysfunction and the autocracy and thought, wow, this is about it.
Speaker 1: In No, No, it's just hey man making a perfect world.
Speaker 1: It's going to be complicated. Bringing about the revolution and
Speaker 1: then running things on revolutionary principles means you never have
Speaker 1: to say you're sorry because you got bigger things. You
Speaker 1: got bigger fish to fry, so to speak, you're in
Speaker 1: the freedom. This is the Buck Sex and Show podcast.
Speaker 1: All right, more roll called head, She reminds me, I
Speaker 1: bet producer Mark hasn't even sent Bill to have seen
Speaker 1: Bill and Ted's excellent adventure have you. Oh no, you
Speaker 1: young whipper snapper, how do you have you not seen
Speaker 1: Bill and Ted's excellently. I swear these young millennials they
Speaker 1: need to show a little more respect to the canon
Speaker 1: of great film and music from the old Graybeard millennial
Speaker 1: era also known as the late nineties. Yeah, because Bill
Speaker 1: and I liked all the movies from the late nineties,
Speaker 1: I mean all the music from late nineties. Well that's good,
Speaker 1: that's a good start. But dude, Bill and we got
Speaker 1: to make a list. And Producer Mark, you know, I
Speaker 1: watched Miracle basically on your say so, And I don't
Speaker 1: understand why you need my invitation to watch one of
Speaker 1: the best sports movies ever. See He's so he's so
Speaker 1: crotchety about this. I'm just trying to say, you know,
Speaker 1: I take advice. But you know, when was the last
Speaker 1: I've I've been saying, Producer Mark, have you seen this?
Speaker 1: Have you seen that? When was the last time he
Speaker 1: came on the show? Said I got missus Mark to
Speaker 1: agree to try this out? That's your problem. Missus Mark
Speaker 1: is never going to watch anything that I just do.
Speaker 1: I have to go direct to the source. Do I
Speaker 1: have to get missus Mark to say it's okay exactly,
Speaker 1: that's what your Yeah, all right, you know it. Just
Speaker 1: don't worry. As soon as we get missus, Mark and
Speaker 1: snow Princess together, my god, you and I are going
Speaker 1: to be watching nothing but rom coms. Okay, ready, we've
Speaker 1: got to delay that as much as possible. Maybe Quenwall
Speaker 1: can shut down the state again. Now all of a
Speaker 1: sudden will like the shutdown, Ted, hey, Buck, and Mark.
Speaker 1: I imagine it stinks living with the leftist, but it's
Speaker 1: nice to know someone is keeping the shields high in
Speaker 1: the city. I was born in Detroit, and I know
Speaker 1: how this ends. It's not good seeing a large city
Speaker 1: turn to crap because of dishonesty is the way it works.
Speaker 1: These mayors will do identity politics to sway voters. Detroit
Speaker 1: is a good example of what is to come for
Speaker 1: these cities. It's been over three decades and the city
Speaker 1: has not revived. I loved with listening to you guys
Speaker 1: and wish you the best. Well, thank you so much, Ted,
Speaker 1: And yeah, look I lived I lived in in New
Speaker 1: York that had over two thousand murders a year. And
Speaker 1: you might say, oh, but Buck, you know you didn't
Speaker 1: and like, I've never pretended I didn't grow up in
Speaker 1: the projects, I didn't grow up in a dificulighborhood. I
Speaker 1: grew up in a very nice neighborhood of New York City.
Speaker 1: But that didn't matter because the streets were dangerous even
Speaker 1: a night. What do people think that the criminals are, like,
Speaker 1: We're only going to stay in the bad parts of
Speaker 1: the city. No, if, especially if you're gonna rob people
Speaker 1: and break into places and steal things, where do you
Speaker 1: go there? They're wealthier parts of the city. And it
Speaker 1: was there. The street crime was super high. There was
Speaker 1: graffiti everywhere everybody that I knew. I went to a
Speaker 1: Catholic school where we were told at the beginning of
Speaker 1: every school year, when we were just walking home, walking
Speaker 1: a half a mile a mile home, something like that,
Speaker 1: we were told the beginning of school year to take
Speaker 1: off our little blue blazer and to take off our
Speaker 1: little necktie so we were less likely to get beaten
Speaker 1: and mugged. I'm not making this up. Every year for
Speaker 1: years until the city clean up happened and all of
Speaker 1: a sudden, because people got mugged all the time, some
Speaker 1: would come up to them punch them in the face,
Speaker 1: pull out a knife, take their little velcrow while with
Speaker 1: five dollars in it didn't matter. Happened. All happened though
Speaker 1: most of my friends happened all the time. That was
Speaker 1: where we were, That was where we were living with
Speaker 1: in the city. People want to go back to that.
Speaker 1: It's really it's really stunning. Uh, you know, I knew
Speaker 1: I had in my year a classmate of it was
Speaker 1: a school, the school that was right across from mine.
Speaker 1: There was a young woman who's my age, and her
Speaker 1: and her boyfriend were part of stabbing a guy to
Speaker 1: death in Central Park, filling his body with rocks and
Speaker 1: trying to sink him to the bottom of the boat pond.
Speaker 1: That stuff would happened back then. I mean that was
Speaker 1: a shot, but I mean that bad, bad, violent stuff
Speaker 1: would happen involving people of all socio economic backgrounds, of
Speaker 1: all it was just a free for all. So I
Speaker 1: know what it's like. People libs want to go back
Speaker 1: to that. They don't think it'll affect them though, that's
Speaker 1: the and if it does affect some other people who
Speaker 1: are not well off, if it affects people who are
Speaker 1: you know, in a bad, bad socio economic condition, well,
Speaker 1: an omelet you gotta break a few eggs, right, that's
Speaker 1: what it becomes, always self justifying. It would be worse
Speaker 1: if we weren't doing this, which is just It's as
Speaker 1: upsetting as it gets. But here we are, brad Hey,
Speaker 1: bucking Mark, thanks for hitting it out of the park
Speaker 1: every single day and reading our emails. Of course they
Speaker 1: can thank producing Mark for that one. This protest riot
Speaker 1: thing is an excellent comparison to the Second Amendment. The
Speaker 1: people who follow the law, adhere to stay at home
Speaker 1: orders and do not congregate those who don't gather in
Speaker 1: the streets. By the thousands, they'll be the ones with
Speaker 1: guns when Joe Biden takes the Second Amendment away. Also,
Speaker 1: what's with the left's war on churches, keeping them closed,
Speaker 1: burning them down? They should know by past experience with
Speaker 1: other countries that holy wars don't work out. Well, keep
Speaker 1: up the great work. Yeah, no, I mean, this is
Speaker 1: what I've been saying about cities where you know, the
Speaker 1: bad people have guns and cities, but they want to
Speaker 1: take them out, you know, take it out for us
Speaker 1: and make sure we take them out of our hands,
Speaker 1: rather make sure that law biding people don't It's very
Speaker 1: troubling Joel. Hey Buck, I'll admit when my wife first
Speaker 1: introduced me to your show, I was not a fan
Speaker 1: because of the frequency and sound of some of your impressions.
Speaker 1: Like Hillary. I've taken it back, but I may have
Speaker 1: called you just Tucker Carlson's less confused looking cousin. That
Speaker 1: being said, I'm concerned about the state of things as
Speaker 1: they are, especially as it pertains to the coming election.
Speaker 1: If you remember that pack that liberal states signed to
Speaker 1: transfer their electors to vote electoral votes to popular vote winners, well,
Speaker 1: worries means the scenario where Trump wins the electoral college
Speaker 1: but not the popular vote, would Trump have to step down?
Speaker 1: Your thoughts know, if the system is a system, I
Speaker 1: don't think that'll happen, but anything's going Anything's possible these days. Ps.
Speaker 1: A good format for the multipodcast would be something like
Speaker 1: drunk history, where you sit down with scotch, pour yourself
Speaker 1: a few, and then dispense knowledge. I kind of like
Speaker 1: that idea. I might actually do that. All right, everybody,
Speaker 1: great show coming tomorrow, Share with friends, Shields Hie