WEBVTT - Robinhood: Stealing from the poor and giving to the rich?

0:00:08.200 --> 0:00:12.400
<v Speaker 1>The legend of Robin Hood begins in the Sherwood forms,

0:00:12.920 --> 0:00:18.760
<v Speaker 1>with rob and his merry men reappropriating taxes unjustly collected

0:00:18.800 --> 0:00:28.000
<v Speaker 1>by the evil Sheriff of Nottingham. Yeah, ah, sorry, wrong,

0:00:28.120 --> 0:00:34.280
<v Speaker 1>Robin Hood. The story of this robin Hood begins in

0:00:34.400 --> 0:00:38.879
<v Speaker 1>New York City, where two recent Stanford graduates, Vladimir Tenev

0:00:39.000 --> 0:00:43.240
<v Speaker 1>and Baju, bought toil Away, building software for high frequency

0:00:43.280 --> 0:00:47.479
<v Speaker 1>traders on Wall Street. Inside their office, computer's home and

0:00:47.600 --> 0:00:56.480
<v Speaker 1>keyboards click while outside. I'm here myself as a free individual,

0:00:56.880 --> 0:01:01.400
<v Speaker 1>to humanize the markets and to make Wall Street here

0:01:01.480 --> 0:01:11.560
<v Speaker 1>the sound of what democracy means. Inspired by the Occupy movement,

0:01:11.640 --> 0:01:16.120
<v Speaker 1>to help bridge the economic divide and democratize finance, Tenefan

0:01:16.240 --> 0:01:19.960
<v Speaker 1>Bott designed an app that let anyone access the stock

0:01:20.000 --> 0:01:25.000
<v Speaker 1>market for free, and they named it after everyone's favorite

0:01:25.000 --> 0:01:37.640
<v Speaker 1>egalitarian outlaw, Robin Hood. Welcome to Calling Bullshit, the podcast

0:01:37.680 --> 0:01:41.760
<v Speaker 1>about purpose washing, the gap between what an organization says

0:01:41.800 --> 0:01:45.080
<v Speaker 1>they stand for and what they actually do, and what

0:01:45.120 --> 0:01:47.680
<v Speaker 1>they would need to change to practice what they preach.

0:01:48.280 --> 0:01:50.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm your host, Time Montague, and I've spent over a

0:01:50.960 --> 0:01:55.160
<v Speaker 1>decade helping organizations define what they stand for, their purpose

0:01:55.600 --> 0:01:57.960
<v Speaker 1>and then help them to use that purpose to drive

0:01:58.040 --> 0:02:03.840
<v Speaker 1>transformation throughout their business. Unfortunately, at a lot of institutions today,

0:02:04.080 --> 0:02:07.080
<v Speaker 1>there's still a pretty wide gap between word and deed.

0:02:07.600 --> 0:02:12.240
<v Speaker 1>That gap has a name bullshit. But, and this is important,

0:02:12.600 --> 0:02:15.880
<v Speaker 1>we believe that bullshit is a treatable condition. So when

0:02:15.880 --> 0:02:20.200
<v Speaker 1>our bullshit detector lights up, we're going to explore everything

0:02:20.280 --> 0:02:35.520
<v Speaker 1>the organization should do to fix it. Robin Hood's purpose

0:02:35.880 --> 0:02:40.120
<v Speaker 1>is to democratize finance for all. They say. Their aim

0:02:40.200 --> 0:02:45.240
<v Speaker 1>is to make investing friendly, approachable, and understandable for newcomers

0:02:45.320 --> 0:02:50.240
<v Speaker 1>and experts alike. Employing a business model called payment for

0:02:50.480 --> 0:02:54.320
<v Speaker 1>order flow, robin Hood makes investing free to users and

0:02:54.520 --> 0:02:57.560
<v Speaker 1>just as easy as downloading a game onto your phone.

0:02:58.760 --> 0:03:02.120
<v Speaker 1>And the app doesn't just provide access to the traditional markets.

0:03:02.600 --> 0:03:06.400
<v Speaker 1>In June, robin Hood leveled up to include commission free

0:03:06.440 --> 0:03:11.600
<v Speaker 1>crypto trading, making bitcoin, ethereum, and other tokens available to

0:03:11.720 --> 0:03:17.120
<v Speaker 1>just about anybody. However, as popularity and download numbers grew,

0:03:17.680 --> 0:03:22.600
<v Speaker 1>so did criticism. Massachusetts regulators are accusing robin Hood of

0:03:22.639 --> 0:03:27.560
<v Speaker 1>what they call aggressive tactics in marketing inexperienced investors, using

0:03:27.560 --> 0:03:31.960
<v Speaker 1>gamification to manipulate those customers and failure to prevent outages

0:03:32.320 --> 0:03:35.680
<v Speaker 1>on that trading platform this year. In one example, robin

0:03:35.760 --> 0:03:39.119
<v Speaker 1>had allowed a Massachusetts user with no experience to make

0:03:39.160 --> 0:03:43.040
<v Speaker 1>more than twelve thousand trades in just six months and

0:03:43.080 --> 0:03:46.760
<v Speaker 1>to complaint this morning. The state highlights robin Hood's revenue

0:03:46.760 --> 0:03:50.440
<v Speaker 1>model of payment for order flow. This is a key point.

0:03:51.160 --> 0:03:54.160
<v Speaker 1>Payment for order flow is how robin hood makes money.

0:03:54.360 --> 0:03:58.640
<v Speaker 1>Even though the app itself is free to users. Individual

0:03:58.680 --> 0:04:01.960
<v Speaker 1>investors don't have to pay to trade because big trading

0:04:02.000 --> 0:04:05.920
<v Speaker 1>houses called market makers give robin Hood a small amount

0:04:05.920 --> 0:04:08.800
<v Speaker 1>of money for every single trade that's made on the app.

0:04:09.360 --> 0:04:13.480
<v Speaker 1>The more you trade, the more money they make. That's

0:04:13.520 --> 0:04:18.240
<v Speaker 1>the misalignment that drives the entire conundrum here. Robin Hood

0:04:18.360 --> 0:04:21.560
<v Speaker 1>wants people to trade. It's absolutely in the worst interests

0:04:21.920 --> 0:04:25.200
<v Speaker 1>of clients. The more you trade, the more likely you

0:04:25.240 --> 0:04:29.160
<v Speaker 1>are to lose money. Study after study has shown that

0:04:29.360 --> 0:04:33.440
<v Speaker 1>buy and hold is a much better investment strategy, and

0:04:33.520 --> 0:04:37.320
<v Speaker 1>critics and lawmakers raised the red flag, saying robin Hood

0:04:37.440 --> 0:04:40.320
<v Speaker 1>was designed more like a game in order to hook

0:04:40.440 --> 0:04:46.720
<v Speaker 1>first time investors and then capitalize on their inexperience. Regulators

0:04:46.760 --> 0:04:49.960
<v Speaker 1>also point to incentives like confetti popping up on screens

0:04:50.000 --> 0:04:53.120
<v Speaker 1>after trades and offers for robin Hood customers who are

0:04:53.160 --> 0:04:55.800
<v Speaker 1>more active on that app to move up on waitlists

0:04:55.800 --> 0:05:00.000
<v Speaker 1>for new products. In an attempt to quell the backlash,

0:05:00.080 --> 0:05:03.760
<v Speaker 1>robin Hood actually changed some of their graphics, but critics

0:05:03.880 --> 0:05:09.040
<v Speaker 1>were unimpressed. It's absolutely gamification. They have leaderboards, you can

0:05:09.040 --> 0:05:12.760
<v Speaker 1>win points, they have competitions on on on the site.

0:05:13.160 --> 0:05:15.159
<v Speaker 1>The only thing that they've removed is that you don't

0:05:15.160 --> 0:05:18.320
<v Speaker 1>get confetti now on your screen when your stock goes up.

0:05:18.520 --> 0:05:20.320
<v Speaker 1>You know, the robin Hood's big claim to fame is

0:05:20.320 --> 0:05:23.960
<v Speaker 1>that they've democratized access to finance, But I think they've

0:05:24.000 --> 0:05:28.039
<v Speaker 1>democratized it the same way that Purdue democratized access to oxycontent.

0:05:28.400 --> 0:05:31.320
<v Speaker 1>Simply making something easier to buy does not mean that

0:05:31.360 --> 0:05:33.160
<v Speaker 1>it is there for a good idea to buy it.

0:05:35.360 --> 0:05:38.880
<v Speaker 1>But robin Hood continued to allow anyone the freedom to

0:05:38.920 --> 0:05:43.520
<v Speaker 1>buy whatever stock they pleased until the game stopped fiasco

0:05:43.760 --> 0:05:47.520
<v Speaker 1>in early because being sort of built by the people

0:05:47.520 --> 0:05:50.040
<v Speaker 1>who are doing it as a David versus Goliath thing, Right,

0:05:50.080 --> 0:05:52.240
<v Speaker 1>So you have this army of small traders who are

0:05:52.360 --> 0:05:55.680
<v Speaker 1>using a Reddit message board called Wall Street Bets, and

0:05:55.720 --> 0:05:58.719
<v Speaker 1>they're putting pressure on the short sellers of game step.

0:05:59.200 --> 0:06:02.080
<v Speaker 1>This looks like a move by an outfit called robin Hood,

0:06:02.120 --> 0:06:03.760
<v Speaker 1>which is supposed to be taken from the rich and

0:06:03.800 --> 0:06:07.560
<v Speaker 1>giving to the poor, and doing exactly the opposite. The

0:06:07.640 --> 0:06:10.160
<v Speaker 1>action is so wild that t d amritraded robin Hood

0:06:10.160 --> 0:06:13.479
<v Speaker 1>have restricted trading of these stocks. Traders on Rabbits sent

0:06:13.600 --> 0:06:16.919
<v Speaker 1>the stock soaring this week, causing billions in losses for

0:06:16.960 --> 0:06:20.599
<v Speaker 1>the hedge funds that been against the video game retailer stock,

0:06:20.960 --> 0:06:28.640
<v Speaker 1>and today Wall Street decided enough wasn't enough. Declaring certain

0:06:28.680 --> 0:06:35.719
<v Speaker 1>stocks off limits made the platform look ominously undemocratic, and

0:06:35.839 --> 0:06:42.240
<v Speaker 1>while the app makes complex transactions frictionless, understanding those transactions

0:06:42.240 --> 0:06:46.480
<v Speaker 1>can be really hard, especially for beginners. This lack of

0:06:46.560 --> 0:06:54.960
<v Speaker 1>clarity can have terrible consequences. The most tragic of these

0:06:54.960 --> 0:06:58.920
<v Speaker 1>occurred in twenty twenty when Alex Kerns, a college student

0:06:58.960 --> 0:07:03.000
<v Speaker 1>from Illinois interested in investing, was granted approval by robin

0:07:03.000 --> 0:07:07.039
<v Speaker 1>Hood to trade options, a very risky thing for even

0:07:07.120 --> 0:07:11.880
<v Speaker 1>professional investors because of the interface. He mistakenly thought he

0:07:11.920 --> 0:07:15.760
<v Speaker 1>owed seven hundred and thirty thousand dollars that he didn't have,

0:07:16.440 --> 0:07:19.960
<v Speaker 1>and he wound up taking his own life. The note

0:07:20.000 --> 0:07:23.600
<v Speaker 1>he left, said I had no clue what I was doing.

0:07:25.760 --> 0:07:29.600
<v Speaker 1>The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority said that robin Hood had

0:07:29.720 --> 0:07:34.080
<v Speaker 1>quote failed to exercise due diligence for years. When approving

0:07:34.080 --> 0:07:38.800
<v Speaker 1>options trades, they find robin Hood seventy million dollars, the

0:07:38.840 --> 0:07:43.240
<v Speaker 1>biggest fine in the authority's history. This and a lawsuit

0:07:43.320 --> 0:07:47.600
<v Speaker 1>by Alex Kern's family were finally settled just before robin

0:07:47.640 --> 0:07:54.520
<v Speaker 1>Hood went public in the summer of one. Robin Hood

0:07:54.680 --> 0:07:57.960
<v Speaker 1>says their purpose is to democratize finance for all, to

0:07:58.080 --> 0:08:03.960
<v Speaker 1>make investing friendly, approachable, and understandable for newcomers and experts alike.

0:08:04.680 --> 0:08:07.800
<v Speaker 1>But he's making investing free through an app the same

0:08:07.800 --> 0:08:12.440
<v Speaker 1>as democratization. It feels like gamifying the stock market is

0:08:12.520 --> 0:08:17.840
<v Speaker 1>almost making it too easy. Researching this further, I found

0:08:18.160 --> 0:08:22.320
<v Speaker 1>just the person to help me understand the intersection of gamification, investing,

0:08:22.480 --> 0:08:28.920
<v Speaker 1>and gambling. So I called him up. Folks, I am

0:08:28.960 --> 0:08:33.280
<v Speaker 1>excited to introduce Dr Devin Mills. Devin, thanks for being here,

0:08:33.480 --> 0:08:36.960
<v Speaker 1>and uh, welcome to calling bullshit. It's great to be

0:08:37.000 --> 0:08:39.880
<v Speaker 1>with you, Tie. So before we get into robin Hood,

0:08:39.960 --> 0:08:41.680
<v Speaker 1>I'd love it if you could just tell us a

0:08:41.679 --> 0:08:47.920
<v Speaker 1>little bit about your background. And the work that you do. Sure. Sure, so.

0:08:48.040 --> 0:08:51.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm an assistant professor at Texas Tech University in the Community,

0:08:51.920 --> 0:08:55.440
<v Speaker 1>Family and Addiction Sciences department. My research is on non

0:08:55.520 --> 0:09:00.080
<v Speaker 1>substance use disorders, primarily video gaming and gambling, and with

0:09:00.200 --> 0:09:03.600
<v Speaker 1>regards to gambling, I also look at cryptocurrency trading and

0:09:03.800 --> 0:09:06.920
<v Speaker 1>risk taking behaviors in the financial markets, looking at it

0:09:06.960 --> 0:09:09.840
<v Speaker 1>from the behavioral side of things, trying to understand exactly

0:09:10.360 --> 0:09:12.600
<v Speaker 1>how people can become obsessed with it, how people can

0:09:12.800 --> 0:09:18.040
<v Speaker 1>start to internalize more of a problematic trading pattern. M fascinating. Okay,

0:09:18.160 --> 0:09:23.280
<v Speaker 1>would you take a run at defining that word for us? Gamification? Sure?

0:09:23.480 --> 0:09:25.880
<v Speaker 1>I think the simplest way of defining it is to

0:09:26.160 --> 0:09:31.199
<v Speaker 1>employ game design to an area that doesn't necessarily have games.

0:09:31.600 --> 0:09:35.080
<v Speaker 1>You could not say that we're gamifying the NFL, for instance,

0:09:35.160 --> 0:09:38.440
<v Speaker 1>the NFL football is a game that wouldn't necessarily so

0:09:38.679 --> 0:09:41.880
<v Speaker 1>that wouldn't work. But gamifying learning in a way that

0:09:41.960 --> 0:09:44.240
<v Speaker 1>is something that education has done. And my understanding is

0:09:44.240 --> 0:09:46.880
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of the roots of gamification has been in

0:09:46.920 --> 0:09:50.320
<v Speaker 1>the education domain, right and and so the point of

0:09:50.360 --> 0:09:56.719
<v Speaker 1>it is to essentially make the subject matter stickier, more engaging,

0:09:57.200 --> 0:10:02.440
<v Speaker 1>more uh, fun all of those things, getting someone interested

0:10:02.440 --> 0:10:06.440
<v Speaker 1>in the topic area and making it more of a competition, um,

0:10:06.640 --> 0:10:09.880
<v Speaker 1>giving someone an objective a quest. But there's also the

0:10:09.880 --> 0:10:12.800
<v Speaker 1>gamification in terms of the rewards piece, and I think

0:10:12.800 --> 0:10:14.360
<v Speaker 1>that's where a lot of the literature, a lot of

0:10:14.360 --> 0:10:17.240
<v Speaker 1>the mainstream media has kind of focused more, especially as

0:10:17.280 --> 0:10:20.000
<v Speaker 1>it as applies to some of these mobile applications. Is

0:10:20.040 --> 0:10:24.560
<v Speaker 1>the idea of rewarding individuals for training behaviors, as applied

0:10:24.559 --> 0:10:27.320
<v Speaker 1>to robin Hood in terms of badges and whatnot, kind

0:10:27.320 --> 0:10:31.240
<v Speaker 1>of the Boy Scouts mentality of uh, keep on awarding

0:10:31.240 --> 0:10:34.720
<v Speaker 1>individuals for their acts of service and their acts of knowledge. Yeah,

0:10:34.800 --> 0:10:36.840
<v Speaker 1>let's turn to robin Hood. Would you say that the

0:10:36.920 --> 0:10:40.840
<v Speaker 1>design of the robin Hood app is gamified? They used

0:10:40.880 --> 0:10:44.160
<v Speaker 1>to have the confetti once you made a trade, um,

0:10:44.160 --> 0:10:46.680
<v Speaker 1>whether that was selling or buying. I haven't seen a

0:10:46.679 --> 0:10:49.680
<v Speaker 1>lot of rewards. It doesn't necessarily mean that individuals don't

0:10:49.720 --> 0:10:53.400
<v Speaker 1>feel rewarded in some way, So confetti would be an

0:10:53.400 --> 0:11:00.480
<v Speaker 1>example of a kind of gamified aspect of the app experience. Yeah,

0:11:00.640 --> 0:11:03.840
<v Speaker 1>but I would also I think the the idea that

0:11:03.840 --> 0:11:07.360
<v Speaker 1>that's the only way in which humans interpret a reward

0:11:07.840 --> 0:11:10.600
<v Speaker 1>is kind of a misnomer, right when their portfolio is

0:11:10.600 --> 0:11:12.719
<v Speaker 1>going up a hundred dollars two hundred dollars, or maybe

0:11:12.760 --> 0:11:16.120
<v Speaker 1>it's going down two dollars. I think the human brain

0:11:16.360 --> 0:11:20.520
<v Speaker 1>will interpret that as something to chase, something to continue.

0:11:21.440 --> 0:11:28.040
<v Speaker 1>I wonder, like our human beings all equally susceptible to gamification,

0:11:28.920 --> 0:11:33.600
<v Speaker 1>or are some people more likely to be seduced than others?

0:11:34.720 --> 0:11:37.680
<v Speaker 1>I would say it usually depends on the task. If

0:11:37.679 --> 0:11:40.680
<v Speaker 1>you are an individual who is completely averse to any

0:11:40.800 --> 0:11:46.400
<v Speaker 1>risk whatsoever, the idea that gamification by itself could get

0:11:46.480 --> 0:11:49.600
<v Speaker 1>you to do something that you wouldn't otherwise do I

0:11:49.640 --> 0:11:53.080
<v Speaker 1>haven't seen any research to suggest that gamification is that strong.

0:11:53.920 --> 0:11:59.240
<v Speaker 1>So you're an expert in gambling and gambling addiction, Robin

0:11:59.280 --> 0:12:03.439
<v Speaker 1>Hood says that investing is not gambling. Um, but I've

0:12:03.480 --> 0:12:06.720
<v Speaker 1>noticed that in some of your work you point out

0:12:06.760 --> 0:12:10.280
<v Speaker 1>that there seems to be a correlation between investing, particularly

0:12:10.320 --> 0:12:15.840
<v Speaker 1>investing through a smartphone, and risk taking behavior. So I

0:12:15.880 --> 0:12:20.640
<v Speaker 1>wonder if you could unpack the relationship between gambling and investing.

0:12:20.679 --> 0:12:23.480
<v Speaker 1>How are they different and how might they be the same.

0:12:24.720 --> 0:12:28.480
<v Speaker 1>When we think about gambling, we immediately assign a level

0:12:28.520 --> 0:12:31.960
<v Speaker 1>of risk. When we think about investing, we imply almost

0:12:32.040 --> 0:12:37.640
<v Speaker 1>a strong chance of return, almost eclipsing this idea of risk. Yeah,

0:12:37.679 --> 0:12:41.040
<v Speaker 1>it sounds responsible. I'm an investor or. Yeah. You have

0:12:41.080 --> 0:12:43.199
<v Speaker 1>your friends saying well, that's a gamble versus well, that's

0:12:43.200 --> 0:12:46.120
<v Speaker 1>an investment. You know, that has different ways in which

0:12:46.160 --> 0:12:49.520
<v Speaker 1>we interpret that, But I I go back to the

0:12:49.559 --> 0:12:54.640
<v Speaker 1>basic definition. Gambling is risking something of value, primarily money,

0:12:54.800 --> 0:12:59.200
<v Speaker 1>on the chance of an outcome. Uh that should result

0:12:59.240 --> 0:13:03.880
<v Speaker 1>in individuals earning more money in return. That's gambling. And

0:13:03.920 --> 0:13:07.280
<v Speaker 1>so based on that definition, I find it really hard

0:13:07.760 --> 0:13:11.400
<v Speaker 1>to see stock trading, crypto trading in particular, to not

0:13:11.480 --> 0:13:15.040
<v Speaker 1>be some element of gambling. Now that being said, I

0:13:15.080 --> 0:13:17.199
<v Speaker 1>do encourage people to take charge of their wealth. I

0:13:17.280 --> 0:13:19.760
<v Speaker 1>encourage people to learn more about the stock market, but

0:13:20.040 --> 0:13:22.800
<v Speaker 1>I also think there needs to be uh, some clarification

0:13:22.920 --> 0:13:26.360
<v Speaker 1>on the terminology. In my mind, if you're buying stocks,

0:13:26.400 --> 0:13:29.800
<v Speaker 1>you are gambling, but you're maybe gambling more responsibly or

0:13:29.880 --> 0:13:33.160
<v Speaker 1>less responsibly, and that's a variation of investing. One of

0:13:33.200 --> 0:13:36.480
<v Speaker 1>the other aspects of the app is that it makes

0:13:36.520 --> 0:13:41.360
<v Speaker 1>investing social. Does that make the app stickier? So I

0:13:41.360 --> 0:13:44.400
<v Speaker 1>would I would go back to our gamification question. Do

0:13:44.480 --> 0:13:48.000
<v Speaker 1>they have to have a gamification piece if so many

0:13:48.040 --> 0:13:52.040
<v Speaker 1>people are going to be bragging about it, sharing their gains,

0:13:52.040 --> 0:13:54.640
<v Speaker 1>sharing their losses on Wall street bets. If there's a

0:13:54.679 --> 0:13:58.199
<v Speaker 1>strong enough social community, does it have to have rewards

0:13:58.200 --> 0:14:01.280
<v Speaker 1>in order to increase participation? I think right now the

0:14:01.360 --> 0:14:04.480
<v Speaker 1>research isn't there yet, but generally speaking, when we look

0:14:04.480 --> 0:14:07.440
<v Speaker 1>at motivation in other areas, we see that the social

0:14:07.440 --> 0:14:11.160
<v Speaker 1>component is very very strong. Right. It seems to me

0:14:11.280 --> 0:14:16.240
<v Speaker 1>that people who who enjoy the feeling of risk, uh,

0:14:16.440 --> 0:14:19.200
<v Speaker 1>would be more likely to become addicted by gambling. Is

0:14:19.240 --> 0:14:25.480
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't right? Definitely? Yeah. You have to be interested

0:14:25.520 --> 0:14:28.240
<v Speaker 1>with uncertainty, you have to be okay with that, you

0:14:28.280 --> 0:14:30.960
<v Speaker 1>have to enjoy the rush. There's a little bit of

0:14:31.000 --> 0:14:34.080
<v Speaker 1>research on the fear of missing out. That idea as

0:14:34.080 --> 0:14:37.120
<v Speaker 1>well is quite prevalent. We've started to play with this

0:14:37.200 --> 0:14:39.760
<v Speaker 1>concept of individuals feeling like they're missing out on the

0:14:39.800 --> 0:14:42.960
<v Speaker 1>rewards that other people are experiencing, and that seems to

0:14:43.000 --> 0:14:47.000
<v Speaker 1>be contributing also to individuals taking greater and greater risks

0:14:47.080 --> 0:14:51.120
<v Speaker 1>and trading more problematically than they otherwise would. And so

0:14:51.200 --> 0:14:53.480
<v Speaker 1>that would be you know, again, the sort of social

0:14:53.520 --> 0:14:56.080
<v Speaker 1>aspect of it. You have you're doing it in public,

0:14:56.440 --> 0:14:59.600
<v Speaker 1>and you're watching other people presumably either make or not

0:14:59.720 --> 0:15:02.200
<v Speaker 1>make money, and and you kind of are judging your

0:15:02.240 --> 0:15:07.880
<v Speaker 1>own um success or failure against that of others. Like

0:15:07.920 --> 0:15:11.280
<v Speaker 1>that's got to have an effect on on the stickiness

0:15:11.440 --> 0:15:14.320
<v Speaker 1>of the platform for certain people. Definitely. Yeah, And this

0:15:14.360 --> 0:15:15.920
<v Speaker 1>is something I'm just thinking about in the midst of

0:15:15.920 --> 0:15:19.280
<v Speaker 1>our conversation. Is the idea that is this social piece

0:15:19.320 --> 0:15:23.280
<v Speaker 1>adding to individuals experience of FOMO. So it's amplifying their

0:15:23.320 --> 0:15:26.760
<v Speaker 1>FOMO and that's what's contributing to their greater risk taking

0:15:26.840 --> 0:15:29.800
<v Speaker 1>on the app um. So there there's definitely a role.

0:15:29.840 --> 0:15:32.440
<v Speaker 1>There's definitely a cycle that I can I can see

0:15:32.440 --> 0:15:35.960
<v Speaker 1>from a theoretical perspective. Um, and I'm not exactly sure

0:15:36.000 --> 0:15:39.920
<v Speaker 1>what breaks that cycle. Yeah, And robin Hood says, so

0:15:40.040 --> 0:15:42.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm just gonna quote there from their purpose. They say

0:15:42.840 --> 0:15:47.880
<v Speaker 1>their purposes to democratize finance for all. We believe that

0:15:47.960 --> 0:15:50.840
<v Speaker 1>everyone should have access to the financial markets. So we've

0:15:50.840 --> 0:15:55.320
<v Speaker 1>built robin Hood from the ground up to make investing friendly, approachable,

0:15:55.400 --> 0:16:00.640
<v Speaker 1>and understandable for newcomers and experts alike. And if you

0:16:00.680 --> 0:16:03.120
<v Speaker 1>have a great purpose, and we think robin Hood's purpose

0:16:03.240 --> 0:16:06.520
<v Speaker 1>sounds great, is you have to actually do it right.

0:16:06.560 --> 0:16:09.200
<v Speaker 1>And one of the actions that they could take is

0:16:09.240 --> 0:16:12.320
<v Speaker 1>do a better job of educating people. Are there other

0:16:12.520 --> 0:16:15.560
<v Speaker 1>things that you think robin Hood could or should do

0:16:15.760 --> 0:16:20.800
<v Speaker 1>to make the app align better with their purpose and

0:16:20.800 --> 0:16:25.480
<v Speaker 1>and not be as potentially dangerous. I do. I think

0:16:25.520 --> 0:16:28.680
<v Speaker 1>there's ways in which to have a cool off period

0:16:29.120 --> 0:16:32.640
<v Speaker 1>if someone is trading quite erratically. Uh. Robin Hood has

0:16:32.880 --> 0:16:35.160
<v Speaker 1>and just like any other brokerage out there, has access

0:16:35.200 --> 0:16:38.840
<v Speaker 1>to a ton of data on their interesting and how

0:16:38.880 --> 0:16:41.240
<v Speaker 1>they trade. And this has been something that actually I'm

0:16:41.240 --> 0:16:44.000
<v Speaker 1>borrowing from the gambling literature. Right now, we have quite

0:16:44.000 --> 0:16:48.840
<v Speaker 1>a few tech companies developing applications that can track how

0:16:48.840 --> 0:16:51.720
<v Speaker 1>individuals are gambling, how many bets they're making per minute,

0:16:51.920 --> 0:16:54.720
<v Speaker 1>are they escalating, are they acting in a very erratic way.

0:16:54.880 --> 0:16:57.440
<v Speaker 1>Robin Hood has to be acting in good faith with

0:16:57.480 --> 0:17:02.520
<v Speaker 1>regards to protecting its consumer versus protecting its business um

0:17:02.560 --> 0:17:04.720
<v Speaker 1>and so that needs to be uh, something that needs

0:17:04.720 --> 0:17:08.000
<v Speaker 1>to be drawn out. Binance actually supposedly I don't have

0:17:08.000 --> 0:17:10.520
<v Speaker 1>a Binance account, but they have on their website a

0:17:10.600 --> 0:17:13.520
<v Speaker 1>responsible trading platform, and they do have some of these

0:17:13.560 --> 0:17:16.600
<v Speaker 1>pop ups that say, you know, we're seeing that you're

0:17:16.640 --> 0:17:20.320
<v Speaker 1>elevating your risk, you're increasing your risk position. Uh, you're

0:17:20.359 --> 0:17:22.400
<v Speaker 1>trading quite a radically, you're buying quite a bit. Maybe

0:17:22.400 --> 0:17:24.959
<v Speaker 1>it's time to chill out, basically, to take a break. Uh.

0:17:25.080 --> 0:17:28.679
<v Speaker 1>They do actually put holds on people's accounts. Uh, definitely,

0:17:28.680 --> 0:17:32.680
<v Speaker 1>based upon whether or not they're over there, over extended exactly.

0:17:32.720 --> 0:17:35.640
<v Speaker 1>And finance is a crypto platform, So let's talk about

0:17:35.680 --> 0:17:39.359
<v Speaker 1>crypto because you can buy crypto now on the robin

0:17:39.400 --> 0:17:42.560
<v Speaker 1>Hood app as well. Do you see investing in crypto

0:17:42.600 --> 0:17:45.560
<v Speaker 1>as more similar to gambling than traditional investing since the

0:17:45.640 --> 0:17:49.159
<v Speaker 1>value of cryptocurrency is in most cases based more on

0:17:49.400 --> 0:17:55.359
<v Speaker 1>faith than on any kind of hard asset. Crypto does

0:17:55.440 --> 0:17:59.360
<v Speaker 1>not have a fundamental asset. There's a lot of belief.

0:18:00.000 --> 0:18:05.000
<v Speaker 1>The short answer is cryptocurrency trading is gambling. Is gambling? Right, Yeah,

0:18:05.040 --> 0:18:08.600
<v Speaker 1>Just again, in the spirit of fairness, UM, we should

0:18:08.640 --> 0:18:11.320
<v Speaker 1>point out that and I think you mentioned this earlier on,

0:18:11.359 --> 0:18:13.200
<v Speaker 1>but I just want to make sure we get this

0:18:13.320 --> 0:18:15.480
<v Speaker 1>on the record that to be fair to robin Hood,

0:18:15.480 --> 0:18:19.080
<v Speaker 1>they have responded in at least one tangible way to

0:18:19.160 --> 0:18:22.440
<v Speaker 1>the accusations that they are gamified. You know, before the

0:18:22.600 --> 0:18:26.199
<v Speaker 1>I P O one, they replaced the confetti with some

0:18:26.280 --> 0:18:29.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of new animation, and what they said about it

0:18:29.480 --> 0:18:32.240
<v Speaker 1>was the confetti distracted from the goal of the app,

0:18:32.359 --> 0:18:35.720
<v Speaker 1>which is to make regular people, everyday folks who have

0:18:35.840 --> 0:18:38.000
<v Speaker 1>been kept out of the market feel like they can

0:18:38.040 --> 0:18:41.439
<v Speaker 1>participate and feel like they're being positively reinforced for taking

0:18:41.560 --> 0:18:47.119
<v Speaker 1>steps in their financial life. So, you know, people people

0:18:47.480 --> 0:18:50.760
<v Speaker 1>noticed the confetti, people didn't like the confetti. They have

0:18:50.800 --> 0:18:55.200
<v Speaker 1>addressed the confetti. How meaningful a change would you say

0:18:55.240 --> 0:18:59.160
<v Speaker 1>that is you feel like that's enough? I would say

0:18:59.200 --> 0:19:04.600
<v Speaker 1>that it is start to better serving their consumer, recognizing

0:19:04.720 --> 0:19:08.080
<v Speaker 1>that it wasn't in the mission. It wasn't actually increasing

0:19:08.160 --> 0:19:11.840
<v Speaker 1>or the democrazation. It was adding more maybe fun to it.

0:19:11.880 --> 0:19:14.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how many people really cared about the confetti,

0:19:14.800 --> 0:19:18.040
<v Speaker 1>um right, and so it hasn't changed much. I think

0:19:18.040 --> 0:19:22.680
<v Speaker 1>when I'm looking at their statement to democratize finance for all,

0:19:23.040 --> 0:19:26.320
<v Speaker 1>I would love if they also not just democratize it,

0:19:26.560 --> 0:19:29.800
<v Speaker 1>but increase knowledge. Yes, And I think once you go

0:19:29.880 --> 0:19:32.760
<v Speaker 1>down that road, you're starting to really protect consumers and

0:19:32.760 --> 0:19:37.040
<v Speaker 1>you're starting to increase and democratize finance for everybody totally.

0:19:37.160 --> 0:19:39.840
<v Speaker 1>And you made the point about the gamification of education.

0:19:39.920 --> 0:19:42.680
<v Speaker 1>You could gamify that aspect of the app and make

0:19:42.720 --> 0:19:47.879
<v Speaker 1>it so essentially to unlock different layers of features, you

0:19:47.960 --> 0:19:52.159
<v Speaker 1>had to demonstrate certain levels of of knowledge. Right, essentially

0:19:52.200 --> 0:19:54.520
<v Speaker 1>you have to take a quiz in order to unlock

0:19:54.720 --> 0:19:59.880
<v Speaker 1>the options feature or the margin feature. Um, you would

0:20:00.000 --> 0:20:03.879
<v Speaker 1>you that people would work at internalizing that information, remembering it,

0:20:04.040 --> 0:20:08.119
<v Speaker 1>understanding it, and applying it. And uh, I completely agree.

0:20:08.160 --> 0:20:10.600
<v Speaker 1>It would actually do a much better job of helping

0:20:10.640 --> 0:20:14.280
<v Speaker 1>them achieve their their stated purpose, which is, you know,

0:20:14.359 --> 0:20:16.960
<v Speaker 1>to my mind, a really good one. I think that's great.

0:20:17.000 --> 0:20:19.159
<v Speaker 1>And I was also just thinking you why not you know,

0:20:19.200 --> 0:20:23.160
<v Speaker 1>create something like a diversification quotient that a simple trader

0:20:23.200 --> 0:20:25.440
<v Speaker 1>can look and say, well, how diversified am I? Oh look,

0:20:25.440 --> 0:20:27.800
<v Speaker 1>here's a number up here. What does this number mean?

0:20:28.240 --> 0:20:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Or what about a risk quotation? How risky have I

0:20:31.080 --> 0:20:34.200
<v Speaker 1>been trading? How risky is my is my overall portfolio?

0:20:34.600 --> 0:20:37.240
<v Speaker 1>How how open am I? That's one of the reasons

0:20:37.280 --> 0:20:41.600
<v Speaker 1>why people join these brokerages is ordered to gain access

0:20:41.640 --> 0:20:45.320
<v Speaker 1>to some of this information. And to your point, they've

0:20:45.320 --> 0:20:48.240
<v Speaker 1>got tons of data. They have tons of data about

0:20:48.440 --> 0:20:53.120
<v Speaker 1>people like you, and if it were an anonymised, right,

0:20:53.200 --> 0:20:56.400
<v Speaker 1>they would they would know when you're showing signs of

0:20:56.400 --> 0:21:01.560
<v Speaker 1>getting yourself in trouble and they should flag that to you. Um. Yeah,

0:21:01.560 --> 0:21:03.680
<v Speaker 1>So it seems like there's much more that they could

0:21:03.720 --> 0:21:08.119
<v Speaker 1>be doing as I as I really think about it, Um, Devin,

0:21:08.600 --> 0:21:10.199
<v Speaker 1>we have a tool on the show we call the

0:21:10.320 --> 0:21:13.160
<v Speaker 1>BS score, and what we're trying to do is measure

0:21:13.200 --> 0:21:17.159
<v Speaker 1>the gap between word. Indeed, our scale goes from zero

0:21:17.280 --> 0:21:21.159
<v Speaker 1>to one hundred, zero being the best, zero bs on

0:21:21.720 --> 0:21:25.840
<v Speaker 1>being the worst. Total BS. So robin Hood says their

0:21:25.880 --> 0:21:30.200
<v Speaker 1>purpose is to democratize finance for all and that they

0:21:30.280 --> 0:21:34.240
<v Speaker 1>believe that everyone should have access to the finale financial markets.

0:21:34.320 --> 0:21:37.080
<v Speaker 1>So they've built robin Hood from the ground up to

0:21:37.160 --> 0:21:42.240
<v Speaker 1>make investing friendly, approachable, and understandable for newcomers and experts alike.

0:21:42.960 --> 0:21:46.920
<v Speaker 1>What score would you give them? Um, I'm gonna give

0:21:46.920 --> 0:21:50.680
<v Speaker 1>it a fifty five out of possible one. I look

0:21:50.720 --> 0:21:54.040
<v Speaker 1>at their mission statement and I see that the democratization

0:21:54.400 --> 0:21:58.280
<v Speaker 1>it really has nothing in their about necessarily keeping people

0:21:58.320 --> 0:22:01.520
<v Speaker 1>safe from harm or educating people, trying to just make

0:22:01.560 --> 0:22:05.000
<v Speaker 1>sure it's accessible, uh, and democratizing making sure everyone has

0:22:05.040 --> 0:22:08.080
<v Speaker 1>access to these markets. It seems like that's something that

0:22:08.160 --> 0:22:13.200
<v Speaker 1>robin Hood has accomplished, but that's not necessarily without some consequences.

0:22:13.240 --> 0:22:15.920
<v Speaker 1>I want more from robin Hood. I think robin Hood

0:22:16.119 --> 0:22:20.200
<v Speaker 1>could be a great company that really doesn't just open

0:22:20.280 --> 0:22:23.560
<v Speaker 1>the doors, but also sits people down and says, here's

0:22:23.560 --> 0:22:25.879
<v Speaker 1>how you can do this more effectively, here's how we

0:22:25.960 --> 0:22:29.920
<v Speaker 1>can make you more effective in your trading. It's something

0:22:30.000 --> 0:22:32.960
<v Speaker 1>that I think robin Hood could actually achieve um and

0:22:33.000 --> 0:22:38.040
<v Speaker 1>be really fire its namesaked, really trying to build people up.

0:22:38.240 --> 0:22:41.240
<v Speaker 1>So that's where I see it as it stands right now. Yeah,

0:22:41.280 --> 0:22:43.640
<v Speaker 1>I love the thoughtfulness of that score. And I want

0:22:43.640 --> 0:22:45.879
<v Speaker 1>to thank you for being being on the show and

0:22:45.920 --> 0:22:48.760
<v Speaker 1>taking the time today. Thank you very much, Hi, It's

0:22:48.760 --> 0:22:56.440
<v Speaker 1>been great, So to be fair. Gamification doesn't take away

0:22:56.440 --> 0:22:59.840
<v Speaker 1>a person's free will or absolve them of responsibility for

0:23:00.080 --> 0:23:04.439
<v Speaker 1>or decisions. But robin Hood still turns the stock market

0:23:04.560 --> 0:23:08.400
<v Speaker 1>into a dangerous game, and given their business model, they

0:23:08.400 --> 0:23:11.600
<v Speaker 1>don't have any incentive to change. The more I learned,

0:23:11.880 --> 0:23:14.280
<v Speaker 1>the more concerned I am about the harm that robin

0:23:14.320 --> 0:23:17.840
<v Speaker 1>Hood can do. But we're not here to just curse

0:23:17.880 --> 0:23:20.879
<v Speaker 1>the darkness. It's important to light a few candles as well,

0:23:21.320 --> 0:23:24.160
<v Speaker 1>so we'll get into some ideas to fix robin Hood

0:23:24.600 --> 0:23:36.440
<v Speaker 1>right after the break, Folks, it is time to talk

0:23:36.480 --> 0:23:39.639
<v Speaker 1>about actions that robin Hood could take to better do

0:23:39.880 --> 0:23:44.320
<v Speaker 1>their purpose of democratizing finance for all joining me today,

0:23:44.359 --> 0:23:49.560
<v Speaker 1>we have two extremely qualified experts. First up, I'm really

0:23:49.560 --> 0:23:53.160
<v Speaker 1>excited to introduce Hailey Sacks. Hailey, thanks for joining us

0:23:53.200 --> 0:23:57.040
<v Speaker 1>and welcome to calling bullshit. Thank you so much for

0:23:57.080 --> 0:24:01.560
<v Speaker 1>having me. I'm excited to call bullshit and Haley for

0:24:01.600 --> 0:24:03.399
<v Speaker 1>the listeners. Could you tell us a little bit about

0:24:03.400 --> 0:24:08.720
<v Speaker 1>your background. Yes, So, I'm Haley, otherwise known as Mrs

0:24:08.760 --> 0:24:13.840
<v Speaker 1>dow Jones, and I was the first financial influencer fantastic,

0:24:14.040 --> 0:24:18.400
<v Speaker 1>and I want to introduce Charles road Blood. Charles, thank

0:24:18.440 --> 0:24:20.440
<v Speaker 1>you for joining us today and tell us a little

0:24:20.440 --> 0:24:23.879
<v Speaker 1>bit about your background as well. Sure, I'm a chartered

0:24:23.960 --> 0:24:27.480
<v Speaker 1>financial analyst. I work with the American Association of Individual

0:24:27.480 --> 0:24:32.080
<v Speaker 1>Investors AI and among the things I've created there as

0:24:32.119 --> 0:24:35.400
<v Speaker 1>our prison wealth blooding processes is really about taking your

0:24:35.440 --> 0:24:39.159
<v Speaker 1>goals and having those drive all of your savings and

0:24:39.240 --> 0:24:45.000
<v Speaker 1>investing decisions. Okay, so let's jump right into some ideas. Charles,

0:24:45.040 --> 0:24:47.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna ask you to go first. In two months,

0:24:47.320 --> 0:24:50.159
<v Speaker 1>or less. What's the one thing that you would change

0:24:50.160 --> 0:24:54.359
<v Speaker 1>about robin Hood to better do their story? Well, I

0:24:54.359 --> 0:24:57.280
<v Speaker 1>think they need to focus on long term investing, and

0:24:57.320 --> 0:25:00.320
<v Speaker 1>given that they're an app based broker um, I think

0:25:00.359 --> 0:25:03.280
<v Speaker 1>it'd be great if they could actually gamify the process

0:25:03.359 --> 0:25:06.600
<v Speaker 1>of long term investing, give points or give rewards to

0:25:06.680 --> 0:25:09.960
<v Speaker 1>people who set up automatic deposits, to people who pick

0:25:09.960 --> 0:25:12.359
<v Speaker 1>an allocation and stick with it. And there's things they

0:25:12.359 --> 0:25:15.760
<v Speaker 1>can do like great leaderboards. Uh, this person's increased their

0:25:15.760 --> 0:25:19.720
<v Speaker 1>automatic contribution, this person has gone x days without looking

0:25:19.720 --> 0:25:22.960
<v Speaker 1>at their portfolio balance, a little things like that which

0:25:23.000 --> 0:25:26.400
<v Speaker 1>would really encourage people to think about investing for long

0:25:26.520 --> 0:25:29.320
<v Speaker 1>term and most importantly gets them in the habit of

0:25:29.520 --> 0:25:33.600
<v Speaker 1>not being reactive and not constantly wanting to trade and

0:25:33.680 --> 0:25:37.760
<v Speaker 1>turn over their portfolios. Hmm. I think that's a really

0:25:37.800 --> 0:25:40.159
<v Speaker 1>interesting idea. Haley, what do you think about that idea?

0:25:41.040 --> 0:25:45.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm like enthusiastically nodding. You guys can't see because the podcast,

0:25:46.040 --> 0:25:50.680
<v Speaker 1>but that's pretty much my dream app. Yeah. I guess

0:25:50.680 --> 0:25:54.840
<v Speaker 1>the only question I have about that is is sort

0:25:54.880 --> 0:25:58.800
<v Speaker 1>of um business model? Right? Because right now they make

0:25:58.880 --> 0:26:01.639
<v Speaker 1>money using some and called payment for order flow, So

0:26:01.720 --> 0:26:04.639
<v Speaker 1>the more you trade, the more money they make. Essentially,

0:26:05.200 --> 0:26:08.720
<v Speaker 1>it would definitely be a seismic shift about the revenues

0:26:08.840 --> 0:26:11.000
<v Speaker 1>come from payment for order flow and most of that

0:26:11.119 --> 0:26:16.000
<v Speaker 1>from options and from crypto. So it would require a

0:26:16.040 --> 0:26:19.800
<v Speaker 1>big shift and their business model. But I think it's

0:26:19.920 --> 0:26:23.879
<v Speaker 1>questionable how sustainable their business model is right now, given

0:26:23.880 --> 0:26:27.880
<v Speaker 1>that we're already saying trading volumes dropped because the market's

0:26:27.920 --> 0:26:31.879
<v Speaker 1>been down. Yeah, I agree, it doesn't feel sustainable all right,

0:26:32.000 --> 0:26:36.320
<v Speaker 1>So great idea. Thank you, Charles Haley, your turn. What's

0:26:36.359 --> 0:26:39.360
<v Speaker 1>the one thing you would tell uh CEO of lad

0:26:39.440 --> 0:26:41.640
<v Speaker 1>ten of to do differently to get robin Hood back

0:26:41.640 --> 0:26:45.320
<v Speaker 1>on track. You mentioned at the beginning of this that

0:26:45.560 --> 0:26:51.240
<v Speaker 1>robin Hood is here to make investing easy and democratize it,

0:26:51.880 --> 0:26:55.760
<v Speaker 1>and it almost feels like right now they've given everyone

0:26:56.040 --> 0:26:59.800
<v Speaker 1>the ingredients to cook with, but with no cookbook. And

0:27:00.160 --> 0:27:03.200
<v Speaker 1>so I would really like to see them and force

0:27:03.680 --> 0:27:09.480
<v Speaker 1>uh financial literacy course or some sort of quazz that

0:27:09.520 --> 0:27:13.879
<v Speaker 1>you have to go through before you tread um, just

0:27:14.160 --> 0:27:20.639
<v Speaker 1>to ensure that their users actually understand what they're doing.

0:27:21.040 --> 0:27:23.240
<v Speaker 1>We all want to be intuitive cooks, we all want

0:27:23.280 --> 0:27:26.720
<v Speaker 1>to be intuitive investors, but you know, rarely does it

0:27:26.840 --> 0:27:30.880
<v Speaker 1>actually work out. Yeah, I hear that and and agree.

0:27:30.960 --> 0:27:36.320
<v Speaker 1>So all right, it's it's my turn, and maybe not surprisingly,

0:27:36.600 --> 0:27:40.240
<v Speaker 1>I am hunting in in similar ground with with my idea.

0:27:40.320 --> 0:27:43.040
<v Speaker 1>You two are the experts, obviously, but you know, Robin

0:27:43.080 --> 0:27:46.040
<v Speaker 1>Hood says their goal is to make investing friendly, approachable,

0:27:46.040 --> 0:27:49.520
<v Speaker 1>and understandable, and my biggest beef with them is that

0:27:49.640 --> 0:27:53.640
<v Speaker 1>they've made investing friendly and approachable, but they've done a

0:27:53.720 --> 0:27:57.719
<v Speaker 1>pretty terrible job of making it understandable. So my idea

0:27:57.760 --> 0:28:02.160
<v Speaker 1>is to de gamify the investing aspect and instead gamify

0:28:02.240 --> 0:28:05.000
<v Speaker 1>the education part of the app and make it so

0:28:05.080 --> 0:28:07.800
<v Speaker 1>I earned points for reading and passing quizzes to unlock

0:28:07.920 --> 0:28:11.200
<v Speaker 1>functionality in the app, and don't just drop me in

0:28:11.240 --> 0:28:14.120
<v Speaker 1>the deep end, right, make a point system that creates

0:28:14.240 --> 0:28:18.359
<v Speaker 1>friendly competition among users and kind of encourages me to

0:28:18.359 --> 0:28:22.400
<v Speaker 1>be the smartest and wisest investor, so, you know, hopefully

0:28:22.440 --> 0:28:26.400
<v Speaker 1>making learning to invest well both social and interesting. Part

0:28:26.400 --> 0:28:30.800
<v Speaker 1>of the education could also explain the business model to people,

0:28:31.640 --> 0:28:34.959
<v Speaker 1>which right now is you know, currently buried in the

0:28:35.040 --> 0:28:38.080
<v Speaker 1>terms of service, so people actually understand that there's no

0:28:38.160 --> 0:28:40.520
<v Speaker 1>such thing as free, that that that that actually the

0:28:40.560 --> 0:28:43.640
<v Speaker 1>app because of its business model is encouraging them to

0:28:43.680 --> 0:28:47.480
<v Speaker 1>do things that are not necessarily good for them as investors.

0:28:48.680 --> 0:28:53.520
<v Speaker 1>I actually don't mind if they keep the ability for

0:28:53.600 --> 0:28:58.000
<v Speaker 1>people to invest like willie nilly, as long as it's

0:28:58.120 --> 0:29:02.680
<v Speaker 1>just really clear. But I don't need them to h

0:29:04.360 --> 0:29:08.560
<v Speaker 1>to change their business model, like I want them to

0:29:08.760 --> 0:29:11.440
<v Speaker 1>add to it. And then if you choose not to

0:29:11.520 --> 0:29:14.160
<v Speaker 1>do that, like you said that, it's like very clear

0:29:14.280 --> 0:29:18.600
<v Speaker 1>in Layman's terms. Okay, here are the risk that you're taking. Yeah,

0:29:18.600 --> 0:29:24.000
<v Speaker 1>it just seems like transparency. Yeah, right, So I just

0:29:24.000 --> 0:29:25.880
<v Speaker 1>want to add I get curious. I sent up for

0:29:26.000 --> 0:29:29.080
<v Speaker 1>Robin Hood, I guess earlier this year last year, and

0:29:29.120 --> 0:29:32.200
<v Speaker 1>I got approved the trade options probably within five minutes.

0:29:32.800 --> 0:29:36.040
<v Speaker 1>And I understand options, but they had no idea who

0:29:36.080 --> 0:29:38.160
<v Speaker 1>I was. And you know, if I was a novice

0:29:38.600 --> 0:29:41.920
<v Speaker 1>and more talking about education, I would have no idea

0:29:42.080 --> 0:29:45.760
<v Speaker 1>how deep will pull I'm walking into blindfolded. And I

0:29:45.800 --> 0:29:49.200
<v Speaker 1>think people are signing up and during social media or something,

0:29:49.240 --> 0:29:51.920
<v Speaker 1>they think, oh, let me go buy options on game Stop,

0:29:52.520 --> 0:29:56.200
<v Speaker 1>not having any understanding of what exactly it is they're buying,

0:29:56.720 --> 0:30:01.080
<v Speaker 1>much less the risk involved. Yeah, I was I was

0:30:01.160 --> 0:30:04.880
<v Speaker 1>reading uh just this morning, just to to you know,

0:30:04.960 --> 0:30:07.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of refresh my memory about the young man who

0:30:07.720 --> 0:30:11.400
<v Speaker 1>he was trading options and um, the app told him

0:30:11.440 --> 0:30:14.120
<v Speaker 1>that he owed seven thirty thou dollars at the end

0:30:14.160 --> 0:30:17.800
<v Speaker 1>of some trade, and and in in a note that

0:30:17.880 --> 0:30:20.000
<v Speaker 1>he sent to his parents, he pointed out that he

0:30:20.000 --> 0:30:23.240
<v Speaker 1>didn't have a clue how to you know, trade options

0:30:23.320 --> 0:30:25.760
<v Speaker 1>or what that actually even meant. And so in some

0:30:25.800 --> 0:30:30.280
<v Speaker 1>cases the results are are literally deadly. Yeah, it's extremely

0:30:30.320 --> 0:30:32.880
<v Speaker 1>a risk, especially when you start talking about margin debt.

0:30:32.960 --> 0:30:36.320
<v Speaker 1>That's where people can really lose a lot of money

0:30:36.440 --> 0:30:39.560
<v Speaker 1>versus that they just you just use a cash account,

0:30:39.920 --> 0:30:42.120
<v Speaker 1>then whatever is in any account, if that's gone, that's got,

0:30:42.280 --> 0:30:45.240
<v Speaker 1>that's gone, it's gone, right. But this case, you're basically

0:30:45.280 --> 0:30:48.040
<v Speaker 1>gambling on a credit card. And I think it's difficult

0:30:48.120 --> 0:30:50.080
<v Speaker 1>because people think, oh, well, this is going to be

0:30:50.160 --> 0:30:52.680
<v Speaker 1>the trade that gets me out, and so then they

0:30:52.800 --> 0:30:55.080
<v Speaker 1>keep trying and trying. And I mean it's a tale

0:30:55.080 --> 0:30:58.080
<v Speaker 1>as old as time. Um that that makes me wonder.

0:30:58.640 --> 0:31:00.400
<v Speaker 1>I'd love to hear what both of you to about

0:31:00.640 --> 0:31:05.800
<v Speaker 1>about crypto. Like crypto in particular feels like it's in,

0:31:06.080 --> 0:31:09.960
<v Speaker 1>like it's out at the edge of speculative um for

0:31:10.400 --> 0:31:13.400
<v Speaker 1>for investors how do you view that space. I think

0:31:13.440 --> 0:31:15.600
<v Speaker 1>that it's okay to be excited about cryptot to think

0:31:15.640 --> 0:31:17.480
<v Speaker 1>it's cool, But that doesn't mean that you have to

0:31:17.600 --> 0:31:22.719
<v Speaker 1>like make bitcoin your whole personality. Don't go all in Charles,

0:31:22.840 --> 0:31:26.120
<v Speaker 1>what's you're taking. I think the blockchain technology has a

0:31:26.240 --> 0:31:29.360
<v Speaker 1>lot of interesting a lot of upside, But I think

0:31:29.400 --> 0:31:33.680
<v Speaker 1>it's important to separate crypto from blockchain, and crypto itself

0:31:33.760 --> 0:31:36.600
<v Speaker 1>is a currency. I still can't go in my local

0:31:36.640 --> 0:31:39.960
<v Speaker 1>grocery store with bitcoin or ethere um and buy a

0:31:40.040 --> 0:31:43.520
<v Speaker 1>loaf of bread, and so there's a huge network effect

0:31:43.600 --> 0:31:47.320
<v Speaker 1>that crypto has to overcome. But whereas you look at blockchain,

0:31:47.600 --> 0:31:52.200
<v Speaker 1>we see JP Morgan's actually working with it too, spirit transactions.

0:31:53.000 --> 0:31:54.760
<v Speaker 1>There are a few other areas that I'd love to

0:31:54.840 --> 0:31:57.880
<v Speaker 1>explore with you, but I wanted to start out with

0:31:58.400 --> 0:32:02.320
<v Speaker 1>something that's Scott gallow Way said he said some funny

0:32:02.360 --> 0:32:07.520
<v Speaker 1>and mean things about about Robin Hood. Yeah. One thing

0:32:07.640 --> 0:32:11.000
<v Speaker 1>he said is I believe these guys are mendacious. Fox.

0:32:11.160 --> 0:32:14.880
<v Speaker 1>The company's mission to democratize finance for all is similar

0:32:14.960 --> 0:32:19.800
<v Speaker 1>to Pablo Escobar saying his mission was to democratize cocaine

0:32:20.800 --> 0:32:25.520
<v Speaker 1>um and and you know, humor aside. This idea that

0:32:25.600 --> 0:32:31.640
<v Speaker 1>he's poking at, that that democratizing something is automatically good

0:32:32.160 --> 0:32:36.840
<v Speaker 1>is deeply questionable. I would say, yeah it is. And

0:32:36.880 --> 0:32:40.240
<v Speaker 1>I'll make an analogy here. I'm running at the Chicago Marathon,

0:32:40.560 --> 0:32:42.960
<v Speaker 1>and my time will be against some of the best

0:32:43.080 --> 0:32:45.960
<v Speaker 1>marathon runners in the world, and obviously my time will

0:32:46.000 --> 0:32:50.120
<v Speaker 1>be much slower, but that doesn't harm me. Why walk

0:32:50.160 --> 0:32:53.000
<v Speaker 1>in the wall street. I'm taking my knowledge against everybody

0:32:53.040 --> 0:32:56.520
<v Speaker 1>else involved, and there's a bunch of very skilled people

0:32:56.640 --> 0:32:58.960
<v Speaker 1>with a lot more data and a lot more speed,

0:32:59.600 --> 0:33:04.040
<v Speaker 1>uh the average individual investor, And so individual investors really

0:33:04.120 --> 0:33:07.280
<v Speaker 1>have to play that long term discipline game to have

0:33:07.360 --> 0:33:11.960
<v Speaker 1>an advantage. But Robin Hood encourages this fast trading, this

0:33:12.120 --> 0:33:16.880
<v Speaker 1>concert turnover, which is exactly the wrong thing an individual

0:33:16.960 --> 0:33:20.160
<v Speaker 1>investor should do. Yeah, I mean, that's it's a very

0:33:20.240 --> 0:33:24.880
<v Speaker 1>interesting point. There are not a lot of situations where

0:33:25.560 --> 0:33:29.960
<v Speaker 1>to use another sort of sports analogy, like where you

0:33:30.080 --> 0:33:33.400
<v Speaker 1>play against professionals right out of the gate. You know,

0:33:33.560 --> 0:33:37.080
<v Speaker 1>in football, there's peewee football, and then there's grade school

0:33:37.120 --> 0:33:40.280
<v Speaker 1>football and high school football and college football, and then

0:33:40.440 --> 0:33:44.840
<v Speaker 1>there's the NFL. But in investing, like they tell you

0:33:44.960 --> 0:33:47.840
<v Speaker 1>to strap on a helmet and you're playing against NFL

0:33:48.000 --> 0:33:52.160
<v Speaker 1>players right out of the gate, playing against professionals. But

0:33:52.280 --> 0:33:55.520
<v Speaker 1>like in golf you would have the handicap. In investing,

0:33:55.720 --> 0:33:58.680
<v Speaker 1>you can also have a handicap. It's called not picking

0:33:58.720 --> 0:34:03.040
<v Speaker 1>individual stocks, right, Yeah, And I think a lot of

0:34:03.120 --> 0:34:07.400
<v Speaker 1>people don't really know that. So just another another area

0:34:07.440 --> 0:34:11.799
<v Speaker 1>of inquiry, you know, robin hood is is racking up,

0:34:12.520 --> 0:34:16.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, a bunch of data about each individual user.

0:34:16.960 --> 0:34:18.920
<v Speaker 1>One other idea that occurred to me was just what

0:34:19.120 --> 0:34:22.480
<v Speaker 1>if the app told me what my risk profile was

0:34:22.960 --> 0:34:27.960
<v Speaker 1>as an investor, right and and told me literally you're

0:34:28.080 --> 0:34:30.759
<v Speaker 1>in the red, or you're in the yellow, or you're

0:34:30.840 --> 0:34:33.000
<v Speaker 1>in the green in terms of the risk that you're

0:34:33.040 --> 0:34:37.359
<v Speaker 1>taking based on your investing behavior. Robin Hood could reach out.

0:34:37.400 --> 0:34:41.200
<v Speaker 1>There's these behavioral sciences, whether it's Richard Taylor who won

0:34:41.280 --> 0:34:46.000
<v Speaker 1>the Nobel Prize, marriage statman, Robert Schiller. Um, I'm sure

0:34:46.120 --> 0:34:48.319
<v Speaker 1>they would have some great ideas about how to use

0:34:48.400 --> 0:34:51.480
<v Speaker 1>the data to actually create a more sustainable, better app.

0:34:51.760 --> 0:34:54.320
<v Speaker 1>But again it's a shift in business models to shift

0:34:54.400 --> 0:34:58.279
<v Speaker 1>in thinking. Uh where you know, robin Hood, despite what

0:34:58.400 --> 0:35:02.480
<v Speaker 1>they say, uh, they're all really is to maximize profits

0:35:02.560 --> 0:35:05.719
<v Speaker 1>and not worry about what they're breaking. Um. And it

0:35:05.880 --> 0:35:09.080
<v Speaker 1>is that culture of let's not worry what we break. Uh,

0:35:09.239 --> 0:35:12.080
<v Speaker 1>that can cause a lot of damage. Do other of

0:35:12.160 --> 0:35:16.239
<v Speaker 1>you have any thoughts on the name Robin Hood? You know,

0:35:16.600 --> 0:35:19.360
<v Speaker 1>Robin Hood's namesake was a thief with a twist. He

0:35:19.480 --> 0:35:22.560
<v Speaker 1>stole from the rich and gave to the poor. Does

0:35:23.160 --> 0:35:26.200
<v Speaker 1>the Robin Hood app live up to that story? I'd

0:35:26.200 --> 0:35:28.399
<v Speaker 1>say it's the opposite. And you just look at their

0:35:28.719 --> 0:35:32.880
<v Speaker 1>SEC documents. Um. I mean they're primary source of revenue

0:35:33.040 --> 0:35:35.800
<v Speaker 1>is running orders through market makers, so they're taking the

0:35:36.000 --> 0:35:39.040
<v Speaker 1>orders placed by small investors and out of every trade,

0:35:39.560 --> 0:35:43.480
<v Speaker 1>they're directing it to specific market makers versus trying to

0:35:43.560 --> 0:35:48.800
<v Speaker 1>seek the absolute best execution price. And the investors training

0:35:48.920 --> 0:35:52.560
<v Speaker 1>Robin Hood's platform are paying for that, so they're not

0:35:52.680 --> 0:35:57.600
<v Speaker 1>they're doing exact opposite. Yeah. Yeah, that's a little dark.

0:35:57.800 --> 0:36:05.520
<v Speaker 1>Actually it's GDS. Obviously it's so misleading from a marketing perspective.

0:36:05.520 --> 0:36:13.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, well done, Sadly, somebody somebody smart. Yeah, I

0:36:13.040 --> 0:36:19.680
<v Speaker 1>could say Mr Burns in the background. Excellent, Yes, it's excellent. Um,

0:36:20.360 --> 0:36:24.360
<v Speaker 1>you both are extremely knowledgeable investors and you've both touched

0:36:24.400 --> 0:36:26.160
<v Speaker 1>on this a little bit, but I'd love for you

0:36:26.239 --> 0:36:29.680
<v Speaker 1>to both just off the tops of your heads, what

0:36:29.920 --> 0:36:34.640
<v Speaker 1>is a responsible smart way for a for an inexperienced

0:36:34.719 --> 0:36:39.719
<v Speaker 1>investor to enter the investing game, um, in a way

0:36:39.840 --> 0:36:44.440
<v Speaker 1>that gives them the best chance of of Actually, you know,

0:36:45.600 --> 0:36:47.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't even know whether it's winning the game, but

0:36:47.680 --> 0:36:51.839
<v Speaker 1>but doing well not getting hurt. Okay, go, I'll go first. UM.

0:36:51.960 --> 0:36:55.200
<v Speaker 1>I would say, someone who's working at a company offers

0:36:55.239 --> 0:36:58.719
<v Speaker 1>a four oh one k, set it up, UM. If

0:36:58.800 --> 0:37:01.799
<v Speaker 1>you don't really have strong knowledge of allocation chances are

0:37:01.840 --> 0:37:05.359
<v Speaker 1>the default allocations a target date fun. They're very good

0:37:05.440 --> 0:37:08.480
<v Speaker 1>default option if you don't know what you're doing, And

0:37:08.680 --> 0:37:11.920
<v Speaker 1>every year increase how much you're contributing, even it's just

0:37:12.040 --> 0:37:16.160
<v Speaker 1>ten more, keep increasing it, keep saving as much as

0:37:16.239 --> 0:37:18.960
<v Speaker 1>you can, UM. And then I'll pass along the advice

0:37:19.080 --> 0:37:21.880
<v Speaker 1>Jack Bobe gave to me once, don't look at your

0:37:21.880 --> 0:37:24.759
<v Speaker 1>account for thirty or forty years. And then when you do,

0:37:25.400 --> 0:37:27.839
<v Speaker 1>have a doctor on call, because you might faint when

0:37:27.880 --> 0:37:33.160
<v Speaker 1>you see how big the balance is. That's great, love it, Okay, Hayley.

0:37:34.160 --> 0:37:38.520
<v Speaker 1>I agree. I think like starting with your four O

0:37:38.600 --> 0:37:42.520
<v Speaker 1>onek matches obviously the best way to have a guaranteed

0:37:43.040 --> 0:37:47.680
<v Speaker 1>two hundred as to return UM on your investment. I

0:37:47.800 --> 0:37:50.600
<v Speaker 1>also think that what's really important for beginner investors is

0:37:50.680 --> 0:37:53.799
<v Speaker 1>to know why they're investing, because it's obviously a sacrifice.

0:37:53.880 --> 0:37:58.439
<v Speaker 1>We would love to all, like, you know, just spend, spend, spend, spend, spend.

0:37:58.480 --> 0:38:02.800
<v Speaker 1>I love spending money. It's very fun. You should try it.

0:38:03.000 --> 0:38:08.120
<v Speaker 1>But but knowing knowing why I'm not having a story

0:38:08.200 --> 0:38:10.640
<v Speaker 1>in my mind, a clear idea of why I can't

0:38:10.680 --> 0:38:14.200
<v Speaker 1>do something makes it a lot easier UM and sort

0:38:14.239 --> 0:38:16.360
<v Speaker 1>of gets you aligned with yourself. I think in a

0:38:16.480 --> 0:38:19.879
<v Speaker 1>really powerful way. M hm. And I think for someone

0:38:20.000 --> 0:38:23.040
<v Speaker 1>starting out, just that's what your goals are. List what

0:38:23.160 --> 0:38:25.399
<v Speaker 1>you're going to allocate to and list how much you're

0:38:25.400 --> 0:38:28.920
<v Speaker 1>gonna save. You can use your notes app on your phone,

0:38:29.040 --> 0:38:32.040
<v Speaker 1>and that simple process holds you more accountable, but it

0:38:32.120 --> 0:38:34.440
<v Speaker 1>also gives you that clarity, so you're not trying to

0:38:34.600 --> 0:38:37.440
<v Speaker 1>keep it all on your head, and whenever you're nervous,

0:38:37.520 --> 0:38:39.400
<v Speaker 1>you can always go back to those RT notes. Oh

0:38:39.440 --> 0:38:42.719
<v Speaker 1>I'm saving for vacation, I'm saving for retirement. Just being

0:38:42.760 --> 0:38:45.040
<v Speaker 1>able to look at that and have that reminder when

0:38:45.080 --> 0:38:48.120
<v Speaker 1>the market is really volatile, here's a big picture. It

0:38:48.239 --> 0:38:53.240
<v Speaker 1>keeps you focused and it keeps you more disciplined. Right, alright,

0:38:53.480 --> 0:38:56.720
<v Speaker 1>So are there any questions or topics that we haven't

0:38:56.800 --> 0:39:00.280
<v Speaker 1>touched on that you think users of robin hood should

0:39:00.400 --> 0:39:02.680
<v Speaker 1>know about? You know, I think the idea that robin

0:39:02.719 --> 0:39:04.200
<v Speaker 1>Hood is going to make it easy for people to

0:39:04.320 --> 0:39:08.920
<v Speaker 1>invest really doesn't make it easy because yes, commissions are waived,

0:39:09.080 --> 0:39:12.320
<v Speaker 1>but then you still have to decide what to invest in,

0:39:12.920 --> 0:39:15.680
<v Speaker 1>and just you know, not having that guidance and thinking

0:39:15.760 --> 0:39:18.319
<v Speaker 1>people are gonna walk in and know exactly what they're

0:39:18.360 --> 0:39:22.320
<v Speaker 1>gonna do, it just doesn't work. I would say that

0:39:22.520 --> 0:39:27.040
<v Speaker 1>like investing should be really boring, um, and that like

0:39:27.120 --> 0:39:30.440
<v Speaker 1>if you're getting your thrills from your portfolio and from

0:39:30.480 --> 0:39:39.960
<v Speaker 1>your trades, and like you need new thrills and getting

0:39:40.160 --> 0:39:42.760
<v Speaker 1>rich quick, Like if it seems too good to be true,

0:39:43.080 --> 0:39:46.160
<v Speaker 1>it's probably too good to be true. And like, trust me,

0:39:46.320 --> 0:39:50.040
<v Speaker 1>if you're hearing about it on like Twitter and the news,

0:39:50.360 --> 0:39:53.160
<v Speaker 1>you're too late. Yes, Like the people who are actually

0:39:53.239 --> 0:39:56.360
<v Speaker 1>having the crazy returns are so freaking early on this stuff,

0:39:56.440 --> 0:39:58.560
<v Speaker 1>Like honey, you would know and if that was your

0:39:58.680 --> 0:40:01.520
<v Speaker 1>like d n A and that's not me, that's not

0:40:01.760 --> 0:40:05.879
<v Speaker 1>most people. So get real with your bad self, right.

0:40:07.400 --> 0:40:09.040
<v Speaker 1>I just want to put hi saying. I think if

0:40:09.080 --> 0:40:12.560
<v Speaker 1>you really had deserves to speculate, then segment your portfolio.

0:40:12.640 --> 0:40:15.319
<v Speaker 1>Maybe not a person of portfolio is long term conservative,

0:40:15.680 --> 0:40:17.480
<v Speaker 1>and then you have the small portion and whatever that

0:40:17.520 --> 0:40:20.760
<v Speaker 1>small portion is realized. This is money that you're prepared

0:40:20.800 --> 0:40:24.440
<v Speaker 1>to lose uma and if you lucky with it, great,

0:40:24.760 --> 0:40:27.200
<v Speaker 1>Um you know, but if you don't, at least you're

0:40:27.239 --> 0:40:32.319
<v Speaker 1>not harming yourselves. Yeah, that's that's great advice. It acknowledges

0:40:32.400 --> 0:40:36.440
<v Speaker 1>human nature. We all like to you know, throw caution

0:40:36.520 --> 0:40:38.560
<v Speaker 1>the windicationally, but if as so long as you're not

0:40:38.640 --> 0:40:43.239
<v Speaker 1>betting the farm. So to wrap up, uh, we have

0:40:43.400 --> 0:40:46.520
<v Speaker 1>a tool on this show that we call the BS scale.

0:40:47.480 --> 0:40:52.840
<v Speaker 1>Zero is the best meaning zero BS and on is

0:40:52.880 --> 0:40:57.600
<v Speaker 1>the worst total BS. So on that scale, what score

0:40:57.880 --> 0:41:02.560
<v Speaker 1>would you both? Uh you to Robin Hood Hayley. Um,

0:41:02.840 --> 0:41:10.279
<v Speaker 1>why don't you go first? Oh? Um? Well it's hard

0:41:10.400 --> 0:41:14.120
<v Speaker 1>because like they are letting you it's not like they're

0:41:14.160 --> 0:41:16.080
<v Speaker 1>like not letting you trade. So it's like they're not

0:41:16.320 --> 0:41:18.640
<v Speaker 1>fully bullshit because they are doing what they say that

0:41:18.719 --> 0:41:22.440
<v Speaker 1>they do. They're just like withholding information and uh, you know,

0:41:22.680 --> 0:41:31.200
<v Speaker 1>profiting from compulsion, so I would say like sixty three. Yeah, Charles,

0:41:31.760 --> 0:41:33.120
<v Speaker 1>you know I was gonna go a little bit higher.

0:41:33.120 --> 0:41:37.319
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna go probably, And I will say the reason

0:41:37.400 --> 0:41:40.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm not even higher is I do think one thing

0:41:40.320 --> 0:41:43.440
<v Speaker 1>they did do was they got the major brokerages to

0:41:43.480 --> 0:41:45.960
<v Speaker 1>get the commissions down to zero. And while we can

0:41:46.000 --> 0:41:49.160
<v Speaker 1>talk about paying for order flow, if you're an investor

0:41:49.200 --> 0:41:52.440
<v Speaker 1>and you're making paycheck related contributions to your IRA or

0:41:52.480 --> 0:41:55.840
<v Speaker 1>your roth IRA, UM, that's huge. Where maybe you're putting

0:41:55.840 --> 0:41:58.800
<v Speaker 1>in fifty. I think if you average it out of

0:41:59.640 --> 0:42:02.239
<v Speaker 1>page text, I think the limit for i RAS is

0:42:02.280 --> 0:42:05.360
<v Speaker 1>like two a paycheck to be able to invest at

0:42:05.400 --> 0:42:10.120
<v Speaker 1>two at no cost every pay period. Um, that's actually

0:42:10.120 --> 0:42:12.759
<v Speaker 1>a big benefit, and I'll give Robin Hood credit for

0:42:12.960 --> 0:42:16.759
<v Speaker 1>bringing that about. Unfortunately, they also unleashed a weapon of

0:42:16.880 --> 0:42:22.120
<v Speaker 1>mass financial destruction with our gamifications. So that's why the

0:42:22.440 --> 0:42:26.799
<v Speaker 1>Bullshop meter is rather high. Yeah, that resonates, and um,

0:42:27.040 --> 0:42:29.880
<v Speaker 1>I think that's the that's the highest score that anyone

0:42:29.960 --> 0:42:33.600
<v Speaker 1>has given them. But I follow your reasoning. So this

0:42:33.800 --> 0:42:36.320
<v Speaker 1>was a great conversation. Charles and Haley. I want to

0:42:36.360 --> 0:42:38.680
<v Speaker 1>thank you both for being on the show. Thank you

0:42:39.160 --> 0:42:44.279
<v Speaker 1>thank you. Happy to invite it, folks, it is time

0:42:44.320 --> 0:42:48.480
<v Speaker 1>to give robin Hood their official BS score. The key

0:42:48.560 --> 0:42:53.000
<v Speaker 1>takeaway from me here is free is never really free.

0:42:53.640 --> 0:42:56.319
<v Speaker 1>Free always comes at a price, and in this case,

0:42:56.760 --> 0:42:59.520
<v Speaker 1>the price is being tossed into the deep end before

0:42:59.560 --> 0:43:03.160
<v Speaker 1>you even know how to swim. Robin Hood is good

0:43:03.239 --> 0:43:07.760
<v Speaker 1>at fooling unsuspecting newcomers into thinking investing is free and easy.

0:43:08.560 --> 0:43:13.120
<v Speaker 1>It's free, but it ain't easy. You have almost immediate

0:43:13.200 --> 0:43:16.680
<v Speaker 1>access to some very dangerous tools, and you're asked to

0:43:16.760 --> 0:43:20.799
<v Speaker 1>compete against career professionals. You wouldn't let a teenager who

0:43:20.840 --> 0:43:23.920
<v Speaker 1>had never touched a football play in the NFL, but

0:43:24.200 --> 0:43:28.080
<v Speaker 1>that's what Robin Hood does with inexperienced investors every day.

0:43:28.800 --> 0:43:31.760
<v Speaker 1>So I'm giving robin Hood a BS score of seventy.

0:43:35.239 --> 0:43:38.960
<v Speaker 1>They've accomplished the democratization piece of their mission, and the

0:43:39.040 --> 0:43:42.240
<v Speaker 1>app is certainly user friendly, but they have a long

0:43:42.480 --> 0:43:46.040
<v Speaker 1>way to go to make investing more understandable. If they

0:43:46.200 --> 0:43:50.759
<v Speaker 1>leaned into education by gamifying learning instead of trading, they

0:43:50.880 --> 0:43:54.080
<v Speaker 1>might really be onto something. And Robin Hood, CEO of

0:43:54.200 --> 0:43:56.960
<v Speaker 1>lad Tene, if you'd ever like to come on the

0:43:56.960 --> 0:44:00.480
<v Speaker 1>show to discuss anything that we've talked about today. Please

0:44:00.560 --> 0:44:05.880
<v Speaker 1>know that you have an open invitation if you're thinking

0:44:05.920 --> 0:44:08.960
<v Speaker 1>about starting a purpose led business or beginning the journey

0:44:09.000 --> 0:44:12.520
<v Speaker 1>of transformation to become one. Here are three things you

0:44:12.640 --> 0:44:18.480
<v Speaker 1>should take away from this episode. One, language matters. Every

0:44:18.560 --> 0:44:21.440
<v Speaker 1>word that robin Hood chose in their purpose should be

0:44:21.520 --> 0:44:25.720
<v Speaker 1>there for a reason, and it should drive action. Democratize

0:44:25.760 --> 0:44:29.480
<v Speaker 1>finance for all check. They do this by making it free.

0:44:30.560 --> 0:44:36.000
<v Speaker 1>Make investing friendly, approachable, and understandable for newcomers and experts alike.

0:44:36.880 --> 0:44:43.040
<v Speaker 1>Friendly and approachable, check and check understandable Nope, And when

0:44:43.080 --> 0:44:47.080
<v Speaker 1>you're dealing with money, failing to make it understandable is dangerous.

0:44:47.719 --> 0:44:50.080
<v Speaker 1>Choose every word in your purpose with care and make

0:44:50.160 --> 0:44:54.359
<v Speaker 1>sure that you're prepared to back them up with action. Two,

0:44:55.120 --> 0:44:58.480
<v Speaker 1>your purpose and your business model have to be aligned.

0:44:59.000 --> 0:45:02.480
<v Speaker 1>Robin Hoods are aren't Trading on robin Hood is free,

0:45:03.040 --> 0:45:07.560
<v Speaker 1>but free is not free. Their actual business model is

0:45:07.600 --> 0:45:10.120
<v Speaker 1>to make money off of every trade you make through

0:45:10.239 --> 0:45:14.920
<v Speaker 1>market makers. Trading too often is a bad habit, especially

0:45:15.040 --> 0:45:18.000
<v Speaker 1>for beginners, but if you don't trade a lot, robin

0:45:18.040 --> 0:45:21.480
<v Speaker 1>Hood doesn't make any money. That's why they gamify the

0:45:21.600 --> 0:45:26.160
<v Speaker 1>experience to encourage you to trade. Worse, they don't explain

0:45:26.280 --> 0:45:29.160
<v Speaker 1>that to you anywhere except in the terms of service.

0:45:30.000 --> 0:45:33.560
<v Speaker 1>Make sure in your business your purpose aligns with the

0:45:33.600 --> 0:45:39.160
<v Speaker 1>way that you make money. And three, be transparent. Like

0:45:39.280 --> 0:45:42.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot of technology businesses today, robin Hood hides the

0:45:42.600 --> 0:45:46.360
<v Speaker 1>questionable aspects of their business in their terms of service.

0:45:47.200 --> 0:45:50.799
<v Speaker 1>That's just shitty and it makes people hate you. If

0:45:50.840 --> 0:45:53.880
<v Speaker 1>you're feeling sheepish about some aspect of your business, first

0:45:54.160 --> 0:45:57.520
<v Speaker 1>consider changing it, or at the very least, be really

0:45:57.680 --> 0:46:01.160
<v Speaker 1>upfront about the way your product works, how you make money,

0:46:01.440 --> 0:46:11.480
<v Speaker 1>and what users can and cannot expect from you. I

0:46:11.560 --> 0:46:15.280
<v Speaker 1>want to thank our guests today, Devin Mills, Hailey Sacks,

0:46:15.560 --> 0:46:18.520
<v Speaker 1>and Charles rope Blott. To learn more about how to

0:46:18.640 --> 0:46:23.160
<v Speaker 1>invest wisely, check out the American Association of Individual Investors

0:46:23.280 --> 0:46:27.800
<v Speaker 1>website at a A I I dot com or have

0:46:27.920 --> 0:46:30.920
<v Speaker 1>a look at Hailey Sacks a k A Mrs dow

0:46:31.080 --> 0:46:35.280
<v Speaker 1>Jones investment course. And a big thank you to James

0:46:35.440 --> 0:46:39.279
<v Speaker 1>Royal for providing invaluable context for payment for order flow

0:46:39.440 --> 0:46:44.840
<v Speaker 1>and other aspects of the robin Hood business model. And

0:46:44.920 --> 0:46:48.160
<v Speaker 1>if you found this show worth investing in, subscribe to

0:46:48.239 --> 0:46:51.160
<v Speaker 1>the Calling Bullshit podcast on the I Heart radio, app,

0:46:51.400 --> 0:46:54.600
<v Speaker 1>Apple podcasts, or wherever you listen to people speaking to

0:46:54.719 --> 0:46:58.440
<v Speaker 1>your ears. We'll be taking a break next week, but

0:46:58.560 --> 0:47:02.400
<v Speaker 1>we'll be right back in your feed on November. Thanks

0:47:02.440 --> 0:47:08.720
<v Speaker 1>to our production team Hannah Beal, Amanda Ginsburg, d S. Moss, Hailey, Pascalites,

0:47:08.960 --> 0:47:13.480
<v Speaker 1>Parker Silzer, and Basil Soaper. Calling Bullshit was created by

0:47:13.520 --> 0:47:17.160
<v Speaker 1>co Collective and it's toasted by me Time Montague. Thanks

0:47:17.200 --> 0:47:17.680
<v Speaker 1>for listening.