WEBVTT - US Stocks Limp Into Year End While Treasury Yields Rise

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news.

0:00:08.680 --> 0:00:13.080
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg business Weekdaily reporting from the magazine that

0:00:13.160 --> 0:00:17.639
<v Speaker 2>helps global leaders stay ahead with insight on the people, companies,

0:00:17.680 --> 0:00:22.560
<v Speaker 2>and trends shaping today's complex economy. Plus global business, finance

0:00:22.600 --> 0:00:26.279
<v Speaker 2>and tech news as it happens. The Bloomberg Business Weekdaily

0:00:26.400 --> 0:00:31.360
<v Speaker 2>Podcast with Carol Masser and Tim Steneveek on Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:32.080 --> 0:00:35.519
<v Speaker 3>We also have some questions about things like private credits,

0:00:35.600 --> 0:00:39.000
<v Speaker 3>private markets, what happens next there? So that is our backdrop.

0:00:39.320 --> 0:00:43.360
<v Speaker 3>Let's talk about the alternative investing landscape. We've got Micreen

0:00:43.400 --> 0:00:46.080
<v Speaker 3>with US portfolio manager and chief strategist at the old

0:00:46.120 --> 0:00:49.479
<v Speaker 3>strategy Ria Simplify Asset Management. They offer an array of

0:00:49.520 --> 0:00:52.519
<v Speaker 3>ETFs and funds. Mike, good to have you here.

0:00:52.320 --> 0:00:53.000
<v Speaker 4>With Tim and me.

0:00:53.159 --> 0:00:55.640
<v Speaker 3>As we have just about two hours to go and

0:00:55.640 --> 0:00:57.960
<v Speaker 3>we wrap up trading here in the United States, ALT

0:00:58.040 --> 0:01:01.960
<v Speaker 3>investing some clear winners and losers. What trends do you

0:01:02.000 --> 0:01:04.080
<v Speaker 3>think might carry into twenty twenty six.

0:01:05.240 --> 0:01:06.760
<v Speaker 5>Well, I think one of the trends has been really

0:01:06.800 --> 0:01:10.400
<v Speaker 5>critical and it has been introduced with the alternative ETF space,

0:01:10.400 --> 0:01:15.160
<v Speaker 5>which really didn't emerge until twenty twenty tied to regulatory changes.

0:01:15.600 --> 0:01:18.759
<v Speaker 5>Things like managed futures and actually trend following are one

0:01:18.760 --> 0:01:21.120
<v Speaker 5>of the tools that has made its way over into

0:01:21.160 --> 0:01:23.800
<v Speaker 5>the ETF space. That has been a leading area of

0:01:23.880 --> 0:01:27.000
<v Speaker 5>interest as people look to diversify from the traditional bond

0:01:27.120 --> 0:01:31.520
<v Speaker 5>equity mix. That's one area where I continually emphasize that

0:01:31.560 --> 0:01:34.480
<v Speaker 5>you're trying not to actually outsmart the market. You're trying

0:01:34.520 --> 0:01:37.960
<v Speaker 5>to recognize that there's information being diffused that you don't

0:01:38.000 --> 0:01:40.840
<v Speaker 5>necessarily have at that point. So that trend following is

0:01:40.880 --> 0:01:44.680
<v Speaker 5>one area. I think other areas that we're seeing increased

0:01:44.680 --> 0:01:48.840
<v Speaker 5>demand for various forms of income. Those take the form

0:01:48.920 --> 0:01:53.080
<v Speaker 5>of derivative tradings, things like call overwriting strategies or put

0:01:53.080 --> 0:01:56.880
<v Speaker 5>selling strategies that are designed to enhance income, or it

0:01:56.920 --> 0:01:59.160
<v Speaker 5>can take the form of things like a hedged high

0:01:59.200 --> 0:02:01.280
<v Speaker 5>yield credit FID, which is one that I manage at

0:02:01.320 --> 0:02:05.160
<v Speaker 5>Simplify asset management, that is designed to reduce the risk

0:02:05.240 --> 0:02:09.400
<v Speaker 5>associated with the uncertainty of areas like high yield with

0:02:09.520 --> 0:02:13.400
<v Speaker 5>credit spreads relatively tight, you want that fixed income exposure

0:02:13.480 --> 0:02:17.000
<v Speaker 5>and that income generation. But we're really not certain how

0:02:17.040 --> 0:02:19.399
<v Speaker 5>the economy is going to play out in twenty twenty six.

0:02:19.480 --> 0:02:23.000
<v Speaker 5>Does a slowdown continue or does it reaccelerate. It's a

0:02:23.000 --> 0:02:25.600
<v Speaker 5>good place to think about other ways to protect some

0:02:25.680 --> 0:02:27.320
<v Speaker 5>of the some of the risks that you have in

0:02:27.360 --> 0:02:28.000
<v Speaker 5>the portfolio.

0:02:28.080 --> 0:02:29.440
<v Speaker 1>So what do you think it's going to do?

0:02:31.120 --> 0:02:33.520
<v Speaker 5>I think unfortunately I heard you talking about the S.

0:02:33.480 --> 0:02:35.160
<v Speaker 6>And P and the lead in. Yeah, you know, I've

0:02:35.200 --> 0:02:38.760
<v Speaker 6>spent a lot of time around bull market. Yeah.

0:02:38.800 --> 0:02:41.920
<v Speaker 5>Well, actually, I think the most important statistic is if

0:02:41.919 --> 0:02:45.239
<v Speaker 5>you pull up the statistics to show asset class performance.

0:02:45.280 --> 0:02:47.359
<v Speaker 5>We're actually now, I believe in nine out of the

0:02:47.400 --> 0:02:51.799
<v Speaker 5>past ten years that large cap momentum and growth orientation

0:02:52.440 --> 0:02:55.400
<v Speaker 5>has been the place to be. Unfortunately, as you know,

0:02:55.440 --> 0:02:57.960
<v Speaker 5>that echoes the work that I do around the impact

0:02:58.040 --> 0:03:02.160
<v Speaker 5>of passive investing in markets. People are largely shunted into

0:03:02.360 --> 0:03:06.840
<v Speaker 5>momentum and cap focused indices by virtue of the way

0:03:06.840 --> 0:03:09.480
<v Speaker 5>we structure our retirement system in the United States.

0:03:10.440 --> 0:03:11.400
<v Speaker 6>Unless we see a.

0:03:11.360 --> 0:03:14.600
<v Speaker 5>Significant change in the economy, it's just really hard to

0:03:14.639 --> 0:03:15.919
<v Speaker 5>bet that that's not going to happen.

0:03:16.160 --> 0:03:18.200
<v Speaker 7>Yet again, Yeah, I you know that.

0:03:18.320 --> 0:03:19.880
<v Speaker 3>I love that you went there, Mike, because I can't

0:03:19.919 --> 0:03:22.040
<v Speaker 3>tell you how many years, several years in a row,

0:03:22.080 --> 0:03:25.079
<v Speaker 3>where people said momentum trade is over the big tech

0:03:25.360 --> 0:03:28.040
<v Speaker 3>you know, megacaps done, It's time to go into some

0:03:28.080 --> 0:03:31.520
<v Speaker 3>of the value names, smaller caps. And yet you know,

0:03:31.560 --> 0:03:33.079
<v Speaker 3>here we are a third year in a row.

0:03:33.160 --> 0:03:33.880
<v Speaker 6>Oh you saw this.

0:03:33.880 --> 0:03:35.800
<v Speaker 1>Every year for the last five years. Well, we doing

0:03:35.840 --> 0:03:36.320
<v Speaker 1>the show with you.

0:03:36.440 --> 0:03:38.360
<v Speaker 3>We see the outperformance. But when I look at the

0:03:38.400 --> 0:03:41.080
<v Speaker 3>economy around me, what impacts my world? A lot of

0:03:41.080 --> 0:03:44.640
<v Speaker 3>those megacap names are largely what I spend a lot

0:03:44.640 --> 0:03:46.240
<v Speaker 3>of time with on a daily basis.

0:03:47.200 --> 0:03:48.880
<v Speaker 5>I think there's some truth to that, but I think

0:03:49.120 --> 0:03:51.040
<v Speaker 5>it also feeds back in both directions.

0:03:51.120 --> 0:03:52.360
<v Speaker 7>Right, given a very.

0:03:52.240 --> 0:03:55.040
<v Speaker 5>Very low cost of capital, we're seeing the impact that

0:03:55.040 --> 0:03:57.800
<v Speaker 5>that has on the investments that these companies can make.

0:03:58.400 --> 0:03:59.960
<v Speaker 7>That means that Amazon.

0:03:59.560 --> 0:04:01.760
<v Speaker 5>Can go out and make acquisitions, or Google can make

0:04:01.800 --> 0:04:05.120
<v Speaker 5>the roughly fifteen hundred acquisitions it's made over the past

0:04:05.160 --> 0:04:09.360
<v Speaker 5>seven years. This puts them in front of you, regardless

0:04:09.400 --> 0:04:11.480
<v Speaker 5>of whether they earned that place initially.

0:04:12.360 --> 0:04:16.080
<v Speaker 1>Michael, I keep getting these emails from whatever formally high

0:04:16.120 --> 0:04:19.520
<v Speaker 1>yield savings account that I had I'll call the highyield

0:04:19.520 --> 0:04:23.200
<v Speaker 1>savings account that tells me that the APR is going down.

0:04:24.000 --> 0:04:27.159
<v Speaker 1>You know, the yield is going down as a result

0:04:27.200 --> 0:04:29.160
<v Speaker 1>of the FED lowering rates, and as a result of

0:04:29.240 --> 0:04:34.120
<v Speaker 1>rates coming down, that money that's in money markets, that's

0:04:34.120 --> 0:04:36.800
<v Speaker 1>in high yield savings accounts, where it's going, where's it going?

0:04:38.200 --> 0:04:41.040
<v Speaker 5>Well, where we're really seeing that money trend is one

0:04:41.120 --> 0:04:42.160
<v Speaker 5>it continues to grow.

0:04:42.240 --> 0:04:43.400
<v Speaker 6>So despite the fact that the.

0:04:43.400 --> 0:04:46.400
<v Speaker 5>Yields are following, money market funds continue to hit new

0:04:46.480 --> 0:04:49.400
<v Speaker 5>highs in terms of assets. That is a byproduct of

0:04:49.440 --> 0:04:52.840
<v Speaker 5>the money market yield in and of itself. After nearly

0:04:52.880 --> 0:04:56.400
<v Speaker 5>a decade of roughly zero yields, suddenly people are getting.

0:04:56.120 --> 0:04:57.960
<v Speaker 6>Three to five percent on those.

0:04:58.080 --> 0:05:02.159
<v Speaker 5>Over the past several years, that's created significant additional income,

0:05:02.160 --> 0:05:04.320
<v Speaker 5>which is meant that money doesn't have to be spent

0:05:04.440 --> 0:05:08.800
<v Speaker 5>in other areas, particularly for those who are starting with money.

0:05:08.880 --> 0:05:13.559
<v Speaker 5>The money can't really leave the money market funds because

0:05:13.600 --> 0:05:15.480
<v Speaker 5>when you go to buy, somebody else is going to

0:05:15.520 --> 0:05:19.320
<v Speaker 5>sell and receive the assets as well. What can happen,

0:05:19.440 --> 0:05:23.360
<v Speaker 5>and what historically causes those assets to fall is either

0:05:23.440 --> 0:05:27.280
<v Speaker 5>the loss of the underlying asset bonds, default companies go bankrupt,

0:05:27.360 --> 0:05:30.440
<v Speaker 5>et cetera. That requires injections of cash that take the

0:05:30.440 --> 0:05:34.200
<v Speaker 5>former primary securities, or we see a surge in new

0:05:34.279 --> 0:05:38.239
<v Speaker 5>issuance things like IPOs, credit for new investment purposes, et cetera.

0:05:38.839 --> 0:05:41.080
<v Speaker 5>It's that latter part that I think we're actually going

0:05:41.120 --> 0:05:43.560
<v Speaker 5>to really see in twenty twenty six. We continue to

0:05:43.560 --> 0:05:47.360
<v Speaker 5>see astonishing demand for investment grade debt. Some of it

0:05:47.400 --> 0:05:50.640
<v Speaker 5>is increasingly questionable how investment grade it is going into

0:05:50.680 --> 0:05:54.119
<v Speaker 5>areas like data centers, but that is an area where

0:05:54.120 --> 0:05:58.200
<v Speaker 5>we are continuing to see significant inflows into the fixed

0:05:58.200 --> 0:05:58.960
<v Speaker 5>income space.

0:05:59.240 --> 0:06:00.680
<v Speaker 3>Well, that's what I want to ask you, you know,

0:06:00.760 --> 0:06:02.560
<v Speaker 3>just going on your website looking at some of the

0:06:02.600 --> 0:06:04.680
<v Speaker 3>company ETFs that you guys offer out there.

0:06:04.760 --> 0:06:05.479
<v Speaker 1>It is an array.

0:06:05.640 --> 0:06:11.799
<v Speaker 3>It's government money market, managed futures, volatility, premium focus, high yield, healthcare,

0:06:12.600 --> 0:06:18.120
<v Speaker 3>Tesla volt Tesla Revolution, ETF, energy, infrastructure, gold, Bitcoin, China.

0:06:18.200 --> 0:06:19.520
<v Speaker 3>These are some of the things that we're going to

0:06:19.560 --> 0:06:23.839
<v Speaker 3>tackle over the next three hours. I am curious about,

0:06:24.160 --> 0:06:26.080
<v Speaker 3>as we were getting near the end of the year,

0:06:26.400 --> 0:06:29.120
<v Speaker 3>were you guys noticing any interesting trends in terms of

0:06:29.160 --> 0:06:31.520
<v Speaker 3>flows in and out of some of these spaces, especially

0:06:31.560 --> 0:06:34.159
<v Speaker 3>after a year where whether it was gold, whether it

0:06:34.200 --> 0:06:37.159
<v Speaker 3>was some of the commodities, whether it was you know,

0:06:37.520 --> 0:06:39.760
<v Speaker 3>some of the healthcare names and others that may have

0:06:40.040 --> 0:06:42.560
<v Speaker 3>run up over twenty twenty five.

0:06:43.680 --> 0:06:45.840
<v Speaker 5>Well, there's a couple of areas, and our growth is

0:06:46.120 --> 0:06:49.600
<v Speaker 5>largely organic and driven by that innovation. We've seen tremendous

0:06:49.640 --> 0:06:53.320
<v Speaker 5>inflows into areas like money market funds. We actually introduced

0:06:53.320 --> 0:06:56.119
<v Speaker 5>a money market ETF in the past year. That's power

0:06:56.279 --> 0:06:59.680
<v Speaker 5>a significant quantity of growth. Our fixed income strategy, the

0:06:59.760 --> 0:07:02.080
<v Speaker 5>high yield strategy that I run, has done well and

0:07:02.160 --> 0:07:05.120
<v Speaker 5>has attracted significant assets over the course of the year.

0:07:05.640 --> 0:07:08.520
<v Speaker 5>Our other areas in fixed income where we offer differential

0:07:08.800 --> 0:07:12.880
<v Speaker 5>exposure to coupon yields in things like mortgages buying new

0:07:12.920 --> 0:07:16.800
<v Speaker 5>issue mortgages as compared to the seasoned index, that has

0:07:16.800 --> 0:07:20.840
<v Speaker 5>been a beneficiary. The areas that we've seen that have

0:07:20.920 --> 0:07:24.520
<v Speaker 5>been I think more alternative in their construction. We have

0:07:24.720 --> 0:07:29.560
<v Speaker 5>a true ESG Healthcare Fund run by my good friend

0:07:29.560 --> 0:07:34.320
<v Speaker 5>Mike Taylor. Mike donates all the proceeds associated with that

0:07:34.520 --> 0:07:38.760
<v Speaker 5>to the Susan G. Coman Foundation, so it's truly giving.

0:07:38.880 --> 0:07:42.320
<v Speaker 5>You know, it's doing good. By doing good, It's performed

0:07:42.360 --> 0:07:45.480
<v Speaker 5>fantastically well. That area of healthcare is starting to attract

0:07:45.480 --> 0:07:49.120
<v Speaker 5>attention as technology starts to lose a little bit of

0:07:49.160 --> 0:07:51.960
<v Speaker 5>its luster. The other area that I mentioned was the

0:07:52.000 --> 0:07:55.640
<v Speaker 5>managed future space that is now our largest strategy and

0:07:55.720 --> 0:07:57.920
<v Speaker 5>has really been a source of continued growth.

0:07:58.040 --> 0:08:00.240
<v Speaker 3>All right, Well, hopefully we can continue talking about that

0:08:00.320 --> 0:08:03.000
<v Speaker 3>certainly in the new year. Happy new year, Mike, Thank

0:08:03.040 --> 0:08:06.280
<v Speaker 3>you so much. Mike Green, portfolio manager, chief strategist over

0:08:06.320 --> 0:08:10.160
<v Speaker 3>at Simplify Asset Management. Joining us here on this Wednesday.

0:08:10.600 --> 0:08:13.400
<v Speaker 1>Stay with us. More from Bloomberg Business Week Daily coming

0:08:13.480 --> 0:08:14.360
<v Speaker 1>up after this.

0:08:18.080 --> 0:08:22.080
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Weekdaily Podcast. Catch us

0:08:22.160 --> 0:08:25.640
<v Speaker 2>live weekday afternoons from two to five pm Eastern. Listen

0:08:25.640 --> 0:08:29.240
<v Speaker 2>on Applecarplay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app,

0:08:29.360 --> 0:08:31.120
<v Speaker 2>or watch us live on YouTube.

0:08:32.280 --> 0:08:33.600
<v Speaker 3>All right, so we want to talk a little bit

0:08:33.600 --> 0:08:36.840
<v Speaker 3>more about retail, more on the trends, the consumption habits,

0:08:37.120 --> 0:08:40.120
<v Speaker 3>and also the role of technology increasingly that may shape

0:08:40.280 --> 0:08:42.120
<v Speaker 3>what goes on in the consumer space in the new year.

0:08:42.200 --> 0:08:45.080
<v Speaker 3>Joining us right now is Laura Champaigne. She's Tabor Asset

0:08:45.120 --> 0:08:48.840
<v Speaker 3>Management's director of research and consumer sector head, joining Tim

0:08:48.840 --> 0:08:49.920
<v Speaker 3>and me right here in studio.

0:08:50.000 --> 0:08:52.200
<v Speaker 8>Welcome, Welcome, Thanks Carol, thanks for having me.

0:08:52.200 --> 0:08:54.160
<v Speaker 3>How are you thinking about twenty twenty five when it

0:08:54.200 --> 0:08:55.360
<v Speaker 3>comes to the retail space?

0:08:56.000 --> 0:08:58.240
<v Speaker 8>Twenty twenty five has been interesting. I think some of

0:08:58.280 --> 0:09:01.800
<v Speaker 8>the trends like strengthen apparel and accessories likely extended to

0:09:01.880 --> 0:09:05.000
<v Speaker 8>next year. We're excited about GLP ones moving to oral,

0:09:05.120 --> 0:09:08.120
<v Speaker 8>not just injectables, so people have to buy new clothes

0:09:08.160 --> 0:09:09.040
<v Speaker 8>if they're changing side.

0:09:09.040 --> 0:09:10.320
<v Speaker 1>I was just going to say what is that doing

0:09:10.360 --> 0:09:12.679
<v Speaker 1>for retail? But you answered the question right there, right

0:09:12.920 --> 0:09:13.439
<v Speaker 1>right close.

0:09:13.559 --> 0:09:16.600
<v Speaker 8>New size exactly, and new clothes may as well have

0:09:16.640 --> 0:09:19.120
<v Speaker 8>new accessories to go with it. So we're focused in

0:09:19.200 --> 0:09:22.800
<v Speaker 8>on apparel. We think they're interesting things happening. You mentioned Nike.

0:09:22.840 --> 0:09:26.600
<v Speaker 8>I think at an earlier segment they are desperate and

0:09:26.640 --> 0:09:29.760
<v Speaker 8>eager to grow again, which puts pressure on Adidas, that

0:09:29.800 --> 0:09:32.880
<v Speaker 8>puts pressure on Hoka on on running. So I think

0:09:32.880 --> 0:09:35.400
<v Speaker 8>that'll be an interesting sector to watch these guys duke

0:09:35.480 --> 0:09:38.880
<v Speaker 8>it out there. We saw so much Nike at Burlington

0:09:39.000 --> 0:09:43.960
<v Speaker 8>last yesterday in the store. In the store Burlington had

0:09:44.000 --> 0:09:46.280
<v Speaker 8>three in caps of Nike and not the weird ones,

0:09:46.360 --> 0:09:47.839
<v Speaker 8>not the Dorito's partnership.

0:09:47.920 --> 0:09:50.160
<v Speaker 3>What does that tell you that they're offloading stuff that

0:09:50.280 --> 0:09:51.160
<v Speaker 3>just wasn't selling.

0:09:51.440 --> 0:09:53.200
<v Speaker 8>It's a weird time of year, right, so it's a

0:09:53.200 --> 0:09:55.880
<v Speaker 8>clearance time of year, and it may be that or

0:09:56.120 --> 0:09:58.760
<v Speaker 8>it may be that Nike will grow sales wherever they

0:09:58.800 --> 0:10:01.520
<v Speaker 8>can and off price. The three big off pricers are

0:10:01.559 --> 0:10:03.239
<v Speaker 8>top ten footwear retailers.

0:10:03.280 --> 0:10:05.840
<v Speaker 1>Now does that dilute the brand at all? To be

0:10:06.440 --> 0:10:07.679
<v Speaker 1>so focused on off price?

0:10:07.840 --> 0:10:08.400
<v Speaker 6>I think it.

0:10:08.440 --> 0:10:11.760
<v Speaker 8>Dilutes the brand and potentially it dilutes the returns. So

0:10:11.800 --> 0:10:15.280
<v Speaker 8>I think investors are really focused at this moment on sales.

0:10:15.720 --> 0:10:19.720
<v Speaker 8>Them trying to turn sales positive, but margins will be lower.

0:10:19.800 --> 0:10:22.120
<v Speaker 8>The reason the previous management team focused so much on

0:10:22.200 --> 0:10:25.840
<v Speaker 8>direct was to maximize profit. We'll see how the market

0:10:25.960 --> 0:10:28.080
<v Speaker 8>views it next year, but I would guess footwar's less

0:10:28.120 --> 0:10:29.600
<v Speaker 8>profitable in twenty twenty six.

0:10:29.640 --> 0:10:30.719
<v Speaker 1>Okay, I want to go back to this thing you

0:10:30.760 --> 0:10:33.360
<v Speaker 1>said about GLP ones because I actually haven't cool right now?

0:10:33.679 --> 0:10:34.120
<v Speaker 6>Very cool?

0:10:34.440 --> 0:10:38.160
<v Speaker 1>As a society. Are we losing collectively losing so much

0:10:38.200 --> 0:10:41.000
<v Speaker 1>weight that we are all changing our closets, we have

0:10:41.040 --> 0:10:42.719
<v Speaker 1>to all get new clothes. I mean, is that how

0:10:42.720 --> 0:10:44.400
<v Speaker 1>widespread these GLP ones are?

0:10:44.760 --> 0:10:44.920
<v Speaker 7>You know?

0:10:45.000 --> 0:10:46.640
<v Speaker 8>As a CNEC, I'll tell you that we lose weight

0:10:46.640 --> 0:10:48.720
<v Speaker 8>and then we gain it back. So most people don't

0:10:48.760 --> 0:10:50.000
<v Speaker 8>stay on the GLP one.

0:10:50.120 --> 0:10:50.600
<v Speaker 6>Well, if they don't.

0:10:51.320 --> 0:10:54.920
<v Speaker 1>This was explained to me I'd read this somewhere. The

0:10:54.960 --> 0:10:58.120
<v Speaker 1>criticism of having to stay on these is like, well,

0:10:58.720 --> 0:11:01.280
<v Speaker 1>if you stop working out, you get out of shape too,

0:11:01.400 --> 0:11:03.560
<v Speaker 1>So you have to think about it like that.

0:11:04.400 --> 0:11:07.160
<v Speaker 8>Most of the analysts we've talked to on the GLP

0:11:07.280 --> 0:11:10.600
<v Speaker 8>ones say that when people stop GLP ones they might

0:11:10.640 --> 0:11:12.200
<v Speaker 8>be eligible again in nine months.

0:11:12.480 --> 0:11:14.400
<v Speaker 1>Do they stop them because they're no longer eligible?

0:11:14.520 --> 0:11:16.760
<v Speaker 8>They stop them because they're expensive. So some of the

0:11:16.840 --> 0:11:21.000
<v Speaker 8>moves that people are making to make these drugs cheaper

0:11:21.080 --> 0:11:24.239
<v Speaker 8>may help people stay on them longer term. Also injectable,

0:11:24.520 --> 0:11:26.800
<v Speaker 8>it's a big deal to shift towards oral we think.

0:11:26.960 --> 0:11:31.000
<v Speaker 1>So don't throw away the clothes, because that's what I tell.

0:11:30.920 --> 0:11:32.440
<v Speaker 6>You, my husband. I've never thrown them on.

0:11:32.480 --> 0:11:34.720
<v Speaker 1>You into it.

0:11:34.840 --> 0:11:35.000
<v Speaker 6>Hey.

0:11:35.120 --> 0:11:36.760
<v Speaker 3>The thing, though, I want to say is that a

0:11:36.800 --> 0:11:38.760
<v Speaker 3>lot of the glp ones are actually for people who

0:11:38.800 --> 0:11:42.679
<v Speaker 3>are diabetics, and so they tend to stay on them

0:11:42.800 --> 0:11:46.720
<v Speaker 3>longer or forever because it's in managing the disease unless

0:11:46.720 --> 0:11:50.080
<v Speaker 3>they ultimately don't need it anymore. But those are It's

0:11:50.120 --> 0:11:53.600
<v Speaker 3>also a market where people are losing weight dramatically, and

0:11:53.679 --> 0:11:57.439
<v Speaker 3>so I mean that is a big sector of our economy,

0:11:57.559 --> 0:11:59.439
<v Speaker 3>or a big sector of our population.

0:12:00.240 --> 0:12:02.680
<v Speaker 8>We also think that apparel has benefiting in part because

0:12:02.800 --> 0:12:07.120
<v Speaker 8>you mentioned Whirlpool earlier. Big ticket appliance is flooring. Those

0:12:07.160 --> 0:12:10.320
<v Speaker 8>sales are way down. Mattresses trying to turn a corner.

0:12:10.360 --> 0:12:12.640
<v Speaker 8>Furniture too, and we hope they do next year. But

0:12:13.120 --> 0:12:15.079
<v Speaker 8>since those segments have been down and they've been such

0:12:15.120 --> 0:12:18.120
<v Speaker 8>a big part of this consumer discretionary budget, it's left

0:12:18.200 --> 0:12:19.760
<v Speaker 8>room for people to buy more apparel.

0:12:20.440 --> 0:12:22.360
<v Speaker 1>I just looked at the credit card statement. My wife

0:12:22.400 --> 0:12:24.719
<v Speaker 1>not only rejoined Costco today but put in a big

0:12:24.840 --> 0:12:29.240
<v Speaker 1>order as well. That's what she's doing Costco for twenty

0:12:29.240 --> 0:12:30.560
<v Speaker 1>twenty six. Things looking good.

0:12:31.320 --> 0:12:34.160
<v Speaker 8>Costco has been losing ground to Walmart, and it's a

0:12:34.200 --> 0:12:38.199
<v Speaker 8>slightly different customer, although Walmart is gaining with higher income consumers.

0:12:38.440 --> 0:12:41.880
<v Speaker 8>Costco took tariffs to heart in a serious way, which

0:12:41.880 --> 0:12:45.280
<v Speaker 8>meant that they had less decor for holiday. I've been

0:12:45.280 --> 0:12:48.199
<v Speaker 8>in there once again yesterday, a lot less furniture than

0:12:48.200 --> 0:12:50.040
<v Speaker 8>they usually have this time of year.

0:12:50.360 --> 0:12:50.720
<v Speaker 4>I think that.

0:12:50.800 --> 0:12:52.040
<v Speaker 3>So, what do you mean they took it to heart

0:12:52.040 --> 0:12:52.760
<v Speaker 3>that they didn't plan.

0:12:53.240 --> 0:12:56.200
<v Speaker 8>I mean that they canceled orders and they stopped buying

0:12:56.240 --> 0:12:58.920
<v Speaker 8>some categories that they used to buy, so they had

0:12:58.960 --> 0:13:01.560
<v Speaker 8>maybe a third as many Christmas trees as they normally

0:13:01.640 --> 0:13:03.400
<v Speaker 8>would and are trying to make it up with like

0:13:03.440 --> 0:13:06.280
<v Speaker 8>baked goods and wine, which they're awesome at. But I

0:13:06.280 --> 0:13:09.200
<v Speaker 8>think it's tough when you take so many big ticket

0:13:09.240 --> 0:13:10.200
<v Speaker 8>items out of the store.

0:13:10.360 --> 0:13:11.280
<v Speaker 3>Talk to us, Oh good.

0:13:11.600 --> 0:13:13.760
<v Speaker 1>Just still on Costco is I was looking, I was

0:13:14.040 --> 0:13:16.320
<v Speaker 1>actually planning out tomorrow and I was thinking, maybe we

0:13:16.360 --> 0:13:19.120
<v Speaker 1>could actually do our Costco order tomorrow. They're closed on

0:13:19.160 --> 0:13:21.920
<v Speaker 1>New Year's Day? Is that pretty rare in retail these days?

0:13:22.280 --> 0:13:25.800
<v Speaker 8>It's rare in retail, But Costco is there at Costco

0:13:26.160 --> 0:13:28.360
<v Speaker 8>where you want to work, like, they pay well, they

0:13:28.400 --> 0:13:31.640
<v Speaker 8>take holidays, they pay good health care. I mean recently

0:13:31.679 --> 0:13:35.400
<v Speaker 8>they started disclosing their regional profit trends. They're barely profitable

0:13:35.400 --> 0:13:38.240
<v Speaker 8>in the US. It's just the membership fees. So anything

0:13:38.280 --> 0:13:40.480
<v Speaker 8>you can buy from there, you really should. They make

0:13:40.520 --> 0:13:42.360
<v Speaker 8>most of their money in their international location.

0:13:42.440 --> 0:13:44.760
<v Speaker 3>Looking at Costco down about five and a half percent

0:13:44.840 --> 0:13:47.680
<v Speaker 3>year to date, Walmart is up almost twenty four percent

0:13:47.760 --> 0:13:49.559
<v Speaker 3>year to date. What is it that Walmart has kind

0:13:49.559 --> 0:13:52.040
<v Speaker 3>of figured out? Is it the digital Is it also

0:13:52.240 --> 0:13:55.920
<v Speaker 3>kind of playing to a higher end consumer on some level?

0:13:56.600 --> 0:13:59.480
<v Speaker 8>It's that and it's also and they work hand in hand,

0:13:59.559 --> 0:14:01.800
<v Speaker 8>so the way they're using tech and AI, A lot

0:14:01.840 --> 0:14:05.040
<v Speaker 8>of it's the back end making their deliveries so fast

0:14:05.120 --> 0:14:08.600
<v Speaker 8>and helping them carry the right products so better merchandising.

0:14:08.640 --> 0:14:10.480
<v Speaker 8>They'll deliver to your house, so if you don't enjoy

0:14:10.520 --> 0:14:13.520
<v Speaker 8>the Walmart shopping experience, you can just wait for the truck.

0:14:13.679 --> 0:14:18.040
<v Speaker 8>So that's bringing in higher income customers, staying really sharp

0:14:18.080 --> 0:14:20.800
<v Speaker 8>on prices, being able to watch, you know, real time

0:14:20.880 --> 0:14:21.720
<v Speaker 8>competitors price.

0:14:21.760 --> 0:14:22.960
<v Speaker 1>That's where you get your gold bars.

0:14:23.040 --> 0:14:24.640
<v Speaker 3>That's where I get my gold bars. Yeah, and I

0:14:24.640 --> 0:14:28.520
<v Speaker 3>have them delivered. Hey, bringing the truck unpacked. What's the

0:14:28.800 --> 0:14:31.800
<v Speaker 3>what's the retail category that you find most interesting right now?

0:14:32.120 --> 0:14:35.040
<v Speaker 8>I think beauty is going to have a resurgence. I

0:14:35.080 --> 0:14:36.480
<v Speaker 8>think that that we've been in.

0:14:36.640 --> 0:14:39.640
<v Speaker 3>Another Stepoora that I go into just outside our office

0:14:39.680 --> 0:14:41.680
<v Speaker 3>is often packed, and you.

0:14:41.840 --> 0:14:44.840
<v Speaker 8>Check out Alta when you're not in Manhattan because they

0:14:44.880 --> 0:14:45.920
<v Speaker 8>are also packed.

0:14:45.920 --> 0:14:49.160
<v Speaker 1>In cover story just in the last couple of months

0:14:49.160 --> 0:14:52.560
<v Speaker 1>on this Amanda Mall wrote about multi success remarkable.

0:14:52.880 --> 0:14:56.880
<v Speaker 8>And carrying a good mix of beauty, skincare, healthcare which

0:14:56.960 --> 0:15:00.200
<v Speaker 8>which others are, hair care which others don't. Do you know,

0:15:00.240 --> 0:15:02.960
<v Speaker 8>Sophora's really focused in on makeup, and Alta does a

0:15:03.000 --> 0:15:04.960
<v Speaker 8>great job of carrying like mid tier brands.

0:15:04.960 --> 0:15:06.760
<v Speaker 1>So who are the winners in the space in twenty

0:15:06.800 --> 0:15:07.360
<v Speaker 1>twenty six.

0:15:07.680 --> 0:15:10.200
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, we like Alta look for kids, and we're seeing

0:15:10.200 --> 0:15:12.440
<v Speaker 8>a lot more kids in makeup. Five below I think

0:15:12.560 --> 0:15:15.040
<v Speaker 8>is a winner. I think five below had great price

0:15:15.080 --> 0:15:16.560
<v Speaker 8>points on You say kids.

0:15:16.280 --> 0:15:17.640
<v Speaker 3>Are you talking like eight year olds?

0:15:17.760 --> 0:15:19.880
<v Speaker 7>I'm talking a lot eight to eighteen, So.

0:15:21.480 --> 0:15:22.360
<v Speaker 6>I guess that's kids.

0:15:22.480 --> 0:15:24.480
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, yeah, I know, but I do see them in

0:15:24.520 --> 0:15:26.520
<v Speaker 8>Alta and I see them in five below in that

0:15:26.640 --> 0:15:29.640
<v Speaker 8>kind of lipstick area, you know, and also buying the

0:15:29.680 --> 0:15:32.880
<v Speaker 8>fake that they had some great fake Kelly's yesterday when

0:15:32.880 --> 0:15:35.960
<v Speaker 8>I was in stores, and of course the Alhambra. They're

0:15:36.040 --> 0:15:39.120
<v Speaker 8>really good at, you know, making it look luxurious for

0:15:39.160 --> 0:15:39.840
<v Speaker 8>the little kids.

0:15:40.440 --> 0:15:44.840
<v Speaker 3>We led talking about Carvana, which has just taken off

0:15:44.880 --> 0:15:47.000
<v Speaker 3>in a big way this year. eBay was up Whirlpool,

0:15:47.080 --> 0:15:50.040
<v Speaker 3>as you mentioned, best Buy to the downside, any of

0:15:50.080 --> 0:15:52.320
<v Speaker 3>those names that you think are worth noting, and.

0:15:52.360 --> 0:15:55.480
<v Speaker 8>Best Buy, we're still concerned about. The data we see

0:15:55.560 --> 0:15:58.000
<v Speaker 8>does not look great for them, and they got some

0:15:58.160 --> 0:16:01.280
<v Speaker 8>help with the new gaming systems this year that probably

0:16:01.320 --> 0:16:05.000
<v Speaker 8>doesn't recur, so best Buy it once again. Walmart taking

0:16:05.000 --> 0:16:09.080
<v Speaker 8>consumer electronics very seriously in gaining with a higher income customer.

0:16:09.080 --> 0:16:10.200
<v Speaker 7>It's not good news for best Buy.

0:16:10.560 --> 0:16:13.520
<v Speaker 1>Give us a big prediction for next year. What happens.

0:16:13.960 --> 0:16:16.160
<v Speaker 3>We're saying, getting asks what's the best day to shop

0:16:16.200 --> 0:16:18.120
<v Speaker 3>at TJX when they get the new delivery.

0:16:18.200 --> 0:16:21.840
<v Speaker 8>You know what, I think that that victorious secret gets

0:16:21.840 --> 0:16:23.080
<v Speaker 8>its momentum back next year.

0:16:23.160 --> 0:16:27.600
<v Speaker 3>You know, Dana Telsey talked about Victoria's Secret with us too,

0:16:27.600 --> 0:16:30.280
<v Speaker 3>that they seem to be going through a redo.

0:16:30.640 --> 0:16:33.760
<v Speaker 8>And we don't need them to be massively successful for

0:16:33.840 --> 0:16:36.520
<v Speaker 8>the stock to work. They're peak. They were selling forty

0:16:36.520 --> 0:16:39.000
<v Speaker 8>five percent of all brawls and units in the US.

0:16:39.200 --> 0:16:42.040
<v Speaker 8>They're down to twenty percent. Move up to twenty five

0:16:42.120 --> 0:16:46.320
<v Speaker 8>or thirty you know, new closed, new sizes, new undergarments.

0:16:46.000 --> 0:16:47.760
<v Speaker 1>All right there it is. That's what we're going to end.

0:16:47.760 --> 0:16:50.600
<v Speaker 1>That's the prediction. Well, hopefully we see you less than

0:16:50.600 --> 0:16:52.640
<v Speaker 1>a year from now. But happy new year, Laura, thanks

0:16:52.640 --> 0:16:55.160
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining us. Laura champai and is Tabor

0:16:55.200 --> 0:16:58.960
<v Speaker 1>Asset and Management's Director of Research and the Consumer sector head.

0:17:00.320 --> 0:17:04.159
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Business Week Daily Podcast listen live

0:17:04.280 --> 0:17:07.240
<v Speaker 2>each weekday starting at two pm Eastern on Apple car

0:17:07.240 --> 0:17:10.200
<v Speaker 2>Play and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. You

0:17:10.240 --> 0:17:13.440
<v Speaker 2>can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship

0:17:13.520 --> 0:17:17.080
<v Speaker 2>New York station Just Say Alexa played Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:17:18.040 --> 0:17:19.919
<v Speaker 3>Gotta say, though, Tim, If I had a nickel for

0:17:19.960 --> 0:17:23.040
<v Speaker 3>every time I said AI or artificial intelligence.

0:17:22.560 --> 0:17:24.920
<v Speaker 1>You'd almost be able to share afford a sheriff in video.

0:17:25.040 --> 0:17:28.680
<v Speaker 3>I would not be here probably no. No, love my job,

0:17:28.760 --> 0:17:30.520
<v Speaker 3>love my job. But you just think about how many

0:17:30.520 --> 0:17:33.760
<v Speaker 3>times every conversation, even over the last couple of days.

0:17:33.960 --> 0:17:36.000
<v Speaker 3>As we get ready to wrap up twenty twenty five

0:17:36.480 --> 0:17:39.879
<v Speaker 3>artificial intelligence. Just in our world, there are questions about

0:17:39.880 --> 0:17:42.080
<v Speaker 3>the spend, the buildout and so on and so forth.

0:17:42.280 --> 0:17:43.960
<v Speaker 3>But curious to see what our next guest has to

0:17:44.000 --> 0:17:47.000
<v Speaker 3>say about all of this. Manos Kuko metes He is

0:17:47.080 --> 0:17:50.200
<v Speaker 3>CEO of UMI. He previously led the science and engineering

0:17:50.240 --> 0:17:53.879
<v Speaker 3>for Google Cloud's Natural language services, while also bootstrapping and

0:17:53.920 --> 0:17:56.720
<v Speaker 3>leading the Google Cloud jen Ai efforts. He has been

0:17:56.760 --> 0:18:00.879
<v Speaker 3>working on Jenai system since twenty sixteen Microsoft and then

0:18:00.920 --> 0:18:03.399
<v Speaker 3>a Meta Man. It's great to have you here on

0:18:03.440 --> 0:18:07.760
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg Business Week and Bloomberg Markets a reminder that AI

0:18:07.880 --> 0:18:10.280
<v Speaker 3>has been around for a long time. So I'm curious

0:18:10.560 --> 0:18:13.480
<v Speaker 3>when you look at where we are today, how do

0:18:13.520 --> 0:18:16.679
<v Speaker 3>you put it into perspective and what's kind of the

0:18:16.760 --> 0:18:22.120
<v Speaker 3>significance of what happened in twenty twenty five after what's

0:18:22.160 --> 0:18:26.280
<v Speaker 3>been three NonStop years of talking about AI and AI investing.

0:18:27.960 --> 0:18:30.679
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, Carol, and think than your remounts for having me.

0:18:31.520 --> 0:18:34.199
<v Speaker 4>As you mentioned, I've been working on AI since tw

0:18:34.200 --> 0:18:36.800
<v Speaker 4>thousand and sixteen, or actually even earlier than that. Twenty

0:18:36.920 --> 0:18:39.159
<v Speaker 4>sixteen was the first time I tried with some of

0:18:39.240 --> 0:18:41.760
<v Speaker 4>Michael founders to me when we're still at Microsoft to

0:18:41.760 --> 0:18:45.760
<v Speaker 4>build something like bet back in twenty sixteen, but it

0:18:45.840 --> 0:18:47.280
<v Speaker 4>was just a little bit pretty much sure, And as

0:18:47.320 --> 0:18:48.879
<v Speaker 4>you mentioned, in the last couple of years has been

0:18:48.960 --> 0:18:54.040
<v Speaker 4>tremendous progress. I mean, it's especially you know five, it's

0:18:54.040 --> 0:18:57.119
<v Speaker 4>been moving forward and advancing at the breakneck speed that

0:18:57.160 --> 0:19:00.439
<v Speaker 4>it's hard to keep up to and very exciting at

0:19:00.480 --> 0:19:00.960
<v Speaker 4>the same time.

0:19:01.040 --> 0:19:03.440
<v Speaker 3>Do you buy all of the momentum? Do you believe

0:19:03.600 --> 0:19:06.280
<v Speaker 3>that the spend and the build out it's going to

0:19:06.320 --> 0:19:08.679
<v Speaker 3>continue at this level or that there's going to be

0:19:08.680 --> 0:19:11.520
<v Speaker 3>some hiccups, especially when it comes to power finding the

0:19:11.600 --> 0:19:15.320
<v Speaker 3>necessary power to keep all of these data centers going.

0:19:17.240 --> 0:19:19.359
<v Speaker 4>I think that it's very likely they're going to be

0:19:19.359 --> 0:19:19.960
<v Speaker 4>some hiccups.

0:19:20.040 --> 0:19:20.520
<v Speaker 7>As you mentioned.

0:19:20.600 --> 0:19:22.520
<v Speaker 4>Definitely we can build data centers, but it's not enough

0:19:22.560 --> 0:19:25.720
<v Speaker 4>power to power them, then we can't use them. That's

0:19:25.760 --> 0:19:28.359
<v Speaker 4>definitely a challenge that is yet to be solved. But

0:19:28.520 --> 0:19:30.520
<v Speaker 4>if I were to look in twenty twenty six, I

0:19:30.560 --> 0:19:33.720
<v Speaker 4>think a bigger hiccup that I foresee is going to

0:19:33.760 --> 0:19:36.159
<v Speaker 4>be coming in twenty twenty six, or it maybe a

0:19:36.160 --> 0:19:38.200
<v Speaker 4>little bit later. But if it's later, it's going to

0:19:38.240 --> 0:19:42.159
<v Speaker 4>be only because of the sun cast fallacy. Is some

0:19:42.640 --> 0:19:46.480
<v Speaker 4>AI bubbles popping. I don't think we're in AI bubble,

0:19:46.520 --> 0:19:50.040
<v Speaker 4>but I think there's some companies like Open Ai, Anthropic

0:19:50.119 --> 0:19:52.919
<v Speaker 4>and others that increasingly they're going to start looking like

0:19:53.040 --> 0:19:55.399
<v Speaker 4>the losing horse. And I think they're going to be

0:19:55.480 --> 0:19:58.160
<v Speaker 4>hiccups in any infrastructure they aspired to build and any

0:19:58.240 --> 0:19:59.840
<v Speaker 4>funding they aspire to collect.

0:20:00.160 --> 0:20:02.200
<v Speaker 1>It hasn't been a difficult for these companies to raise

0:20:02.240 --> 0:20:04.480
<v Speaker 1>funding up till now, but you think next year it

0:20:04.480 --> 0:20:05.040
<v Speaker 1>could be tough.

0:20:07.200 --> 0:20:10.520
<v Speaker 4>I think things are going to be getting harder and harder.

0:20:10.560 --> 0:20:13.200
<v Speaker 4>I think it's about time, and it's already happening. Investors

0:20:13.240 --> 0:20:16.080
<v Speaker 4>that are coming to realize, even though it may be

0:20:16.119 --> 0:20:18.480
<v Speaker 4>hard for them, because again of all the sound casts

0:20:18.480 --> 0:20:21.520
<v Speaker 4>and all the billions that pour into supporting these companies,

0:20:22.320 --> 0:20:25.200
<v Speaker 4>that they are actually looking increasingly.

0:20:24.880 --> 0:20:28.240
<v Speaker 7>Like the losing horses. I don't think.

0:20:28.840 --> 0:20:32.920
<v Speaker 4>I think the the code read that OpenAI declared a

0:20:32.960 --> 0:20:38.840
<v Speaker 4>couple of weeks ago was highly justifiable. There is, you know, heemuth,

0:20:38.920 --> 0:20:42.919
<v Speaker 4>a much bigger player that can have all the talent

0:20:43.119 --> 0:20:47.240
<v Speaker 4>that open ai hasn't much more, that's making four hundred

0:20:47.320 --> 0:20:50.359
<v Speaker 4>billion revenue per year as opposed to losing ten billion

0:20:50.400 --> 0:20:50.720
<v Speaker 4>a year.

0:20:51.640 --> 0:20:52.960
<v Speaker 7>That's in a much better position.

0:20:53.040 --> 0:20:55.719
<v Speaker 4>It has the full stack across the research that chips,

0:20:55.720 --> 0:20:57.920
<v Speaker 4>the models, the applications, in a much better position to

0:20:57.960 --> 0:20:58.199
<v Speaker 4>win this.

0:20:58.560 --> 0:21:00.280
<v Speaker 1>We're going to be speaking of Josh We're going to

0:21:00.280 --> 0:21:02.000
<v Speaker 1>be speaking to Josh win Grove in just a minute.

0:21:02.040 --> 0:21:03.719
<v Speaker 1>Before we do that, I just just set us up

0:21:03.720 --> 0:21:06.600
<v Speaker 1>for that conversation with where the US is compared to

0:21:06.640 --> 0:21:08.639
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the world when it comes to this

0:21:08.680 --> 0:21:11.760
<v Speaker 1>technology and what the US needs to do very briefly

0:21:11.760 --> 0:21:13.000
<v Speaker 1>in order to be the leader here.

0:21:14.840 --> 0:21:17.760
<v Speaker 4>Yes, so I think we may be doing good now

0:21:17.760 --> 0:21:21.080
<v Speaker 4>in terms of the closed models, and this is important

0:21:21.119 --> 0:21:23.479
<v Speaker 4>for us to be doing well. But I think we

0:21:23.520 --> 0:21:26.359
<v Speaker 4>are missing on the most important AI battleground and this

0:21:26.400 --> 0:21:27.200
<v Speaker 4>is open source AI.

0:21:27.680 --> 0:21:28.199
<v Speaker 7>I foresee.

0:21:28.200 --> 0:21:30.360
<v Speaker 4>Looking in twenty twenty six, we've been talking to many

0:21:30.480 --> 0:21:33.159
<v Speaker 4>enterprises from the smallers to the largest ones right and

0:21:33.280 --> 0:21:34.959
<v Speaker 4>one trend that is clear is more and more than

0:21:35.040 --> 0:21:39.040
<v Speaker 4>moving towards open models. And unfortunately this is now primarily

0:21:39.040 --> 0:21:42.280
<v Speaker 4>by Alibaba's Qua model as oppose to a US one.

0:21:42.720 --> 0:21:44.760
<v Speaker 4>So that's I think the most important battleground that we

0:21:44.800 --> 0:21:47.440
<v Speaker 4>need to win. More and more enterprises as they're much

0:21:47.440 --> 0:21:50.240
<v Speaker 4>shooting with their use of the NAI. They're moving from

0:21:50.520 --> 0:21:53.679
<v Speaker 4>large of the self and the inferentiated close models like

0:21:53.800 --> 0:21:56.679
<v Speaker 4>ZPT Claude or Zemini that was building at Google.

0:21:57.320 --> 0:21:58.960
<v Speaker 7>They're more and more moving.

0:21:58.760 --> 0:22:02.320
<v Speaker 4>Towards small specialized custom models are the optimus for the

0:22:02.400 --> 0:22:05.520
<v Speaker 4>use case, and that's the bullyground dot AI needs to win.

0:22:05.600 --> 0:22:06.639
<v Speaker 7>All right, we shall see.

0:22:06.680 --> 0:22:09.320
<v Speaker 3>We shall see what twenty twenty six brings when it

0:22:09.359 --> 0:22:12.000
<v Speaker 3>comes to open versus closed Manas, thank you so much,

0:22:12.119 --> 0:22:12.800
<v Speaker 3>Manos Kuka.

0:22:12.840 --> 0:22:13.159
<v Speaker 7>Meet us.

0:22:13.200 --> 0:22:16.680
<v Speaker 3>He is CEO of UMI, joining us right here on Bloomberg.

0:22:17.880 --> 0:22:20.680
<v Speaker 1>Stay with us. More from Bloomberg Business Week Daily coming

0:22:20.760 --> 0:22:21.720
<v Speaker 1>up after this.

0:22:25.240 --> 0:22:29.160
<v Speaker 2>If you're listening to the Bloomberg Business Weekdaily podcast, catch

0:22:29.240 --> 0:22:32.480
<v Speaker 2>us live weekday afternoons from two to five pm Eastern.

0:22:32.600 --> 0:22:36.440
<v Speaker 2>Listen on Applecarplay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app,

0:22:36.640 --> 0:22:38.680
<v Speaker 2>or watch us live on YouTube.

0:22:39.880 --> 0:22:42.520
<v Speaker 3>Let's get a little bit deeper though, into this media mania.

0:22:42.640 --> 0:22:44.960
<v Speaker 3>Ross Gerber is with us. He's co founder, president CEO

0:22:44.960 --> 0:22:49.040
<v Speaker 3>of Gerbert Kawasaki Wealth and Investment Management out there on

0:22:49.280 --> 0:22:51.680
<v Speaker 3>the West Coast. So good to have you here. Happy

0:22:52.080 --> 0:22:54.200
<v Speaker 3>New Year to you, Ross.

0:22:54.080 --> 0:22:56.440
<v Speaker 9>Happy New Year. I'm happy to be spending the last

0:22:56.520 --> 0:22:57.679
<v Speaker 9>day of the trading year with you.

0:22:57.680 --> 0:22:58.000
<v Speaker 6>Guys.

0:22:58.080 --> 0:23:00.280
<v Speaker 3>Well, we love our conversations with you, and and it's

0:23:00.280 --> 0:23:02.080
<v Speaker 3>fun to be talking about this with you. I mean,

0:23:02.080 --> 0:23:04.560
<v Speaker 3>you did join Bloomberg recently, and I just asked Chris

0:23:04.560 --> 0:23:09.400
<v Speaker 3>about it. This idea about whoever wins Warner Brothers will

0:23:09.440 --> 0:23:12.000
<v Speaker 3>define the future of Hollywood. Chris made the point that

0:23:12.280 --> 0:23:14.280
<v Speaker 3>whoever gets it, it's going to be a rough twenty

0:23:14.320 --> 0:23:17.520
<v Speaker 3>twenty six or twenty twenty seven for that company. How

0:23:17.520 --> 0:23:19.239
<v Speaker 3>do you see it? Talk to us a little bit

0:23:19.240 --> 0:23:19.720
<v Speaker 3>about this.

0:23:19.680 --> 0:23:20.600
<v Speaker 6>Well, he used it.

0:23:20.880 --> 0:23:23.440
<v Speaker 9>Chris used the term that I've used about Warner too,

0:23:23.560 --> 0:23:28.200
<v Speaker 9>which is called the Albatross, and albatross is you know,

0:23:28.400 --> 0:23:31.720
<v Speaker 9>this thing around your neck that constantly driving you nuts

0:23:31.720 --> 0:23:34.640
<v Speaker 9>and never helps you, right. I think it was Ryan

0:23:34.640 --> 0:23:37.320
<v Speaker 9>and the Ancient Mariner where that book was the Albatross

0:23:37.400 --> 0:23:41.240
<v Speaker 9>was from. But the reality is Warner has never made

0:23:41.280 --> 0:23:44.640
<v Speaker 9>anybody any money ever since the old days, since Steve

0:23:44.800 --> 0:23:47.760
<v Speaker 9>Ross started it, you know, And so every buyer of

0:23:47.800 --> 0:23:49.879
<v Speaker 9>Warner Brothers has regretted it, and I think the buyer

0:23:49.920 --> 0:23:52.919
<v Speaker 9>of Warner Brothers here will will ultimately regret paying what

0:23:52.960 --> 0:23:55.840
<v Speaker 9>they're paying for this, because this is really a battle

0:23:55.920 --> 0:23:59.119
<v Speaker 9>for control of the last piece of asset, you know,

0:23:59.200 --> 0:24:02.000
<v Speaker 9>on the monopoly board of Hollywood. And it's a pretty

0:24:02.040 --> 0:24:05.720
<v Speaker 9>good asset, but it's a difficult one at best.

0:24:05.760 --> 0:24:07.040
<v Speaker 6>And Netflix didn't need it.

0:24:07.200 --> 0:24:08.600
<v Speaker 9>But the last thing they we're going to do is

0:24:08.760 --> 0:24:12.239
<v Speaker 9>seed all those assets to Paramount and really create a

0:24:12.280 --> 0:24:17.520
<v Speaker 9>real competitor to them to them by letting zaslof and

0:24:17.760 --> 0:24:21.560
<v Speaker 9>and Ellison team up against Netflix. So in the end

0:24:21.640 --> 0:24:24.080
<v Speaker 9>now they're you know, they're both paying a ton for it.

0:24:24.359 --> 0:24:27.280
<v Speaker 9>The Netflix deal is better structured and it has much

0:24:27.280 --> 0:24:30.480
<v Speaker 9>lower cost of capital, and it involves stock and I

0:24:30.480 --> 0:24:32.040
<v Speaker 9>think it's just a better deal for it, and.

0:24:32.040 --> 0:24:34.040
<v Speaker 1>They're not getting those legacy they wouldn't be getting the

0:24:34.119 --> 0:24:34.960
<v Speaker 1>Legacy TV Networks.

0:24:35.040 --> 0:24:36.399
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, you don't get the legacy cable.

0:24:36.480 --> 0:24:39.119
<v Speaker 9>The only reason Ellison wants the legacy cable is to

0:24:39.440 --> 0:24:42.760
<v Speaker 9>shut down CNNs for Trump, you know. And so that's

0:24:43.080 --> 0:24:45.800
<v Speaker 9>kind of behind the scenes of all this is this

0:24:45.880 --> 0:24:49.000
<v Speaker 9>battle for CNN. And you know, the truth is Hastings

0:24:49.000 --> 0:24:52.240
<v Speaker 9>as a Democrat and and Netflix is more of a

0:24:52.320 --> 0:24:55.160
<v Speaker 9>liberal company, and so you know they want to save

0:24:55.240 --> 0:24:57.320
<v Speaker 9>CNN the way it is and just not be dealing

0:24:57.359 --> 0:24:57.600
<v Speaker 9>with this.

0:24:57.760 --> 0:24:58.920
<v Speaker 6>That's not their business.

0:24:59.119 --> 0:25:02.480
<v Speaker 9>Where Ellison really has more than just money on his

0:25:02.600 --> 0:25:06.640
<v Speaker 9>mind here. This is about power and certainly that's where

0:25:06.680 --> 0:25:09.679
<v Speaker 9>the support from the Trump administration comes for the Ellison

0:25:09.720 --> 0:25:11.639
<v Speaker 9>bid is because he wants to kill soon N.

0:25:12.040 --> 0:25:13.879
<v Speaker 6>So we'll go ahead.

0:25:13.920 --> 0:25:15.560
<v Speaker 1>Well, Russ, we only have a couple a few minutes,

0:25:15.560 --> 0:25:16.959
<v Speaker 1>so I want to make sure we got all the questions.

0:25:17.000 --> 0:25:20.280
<v Speaker 1>And on the Netflix side of things, if Netflix doesn't

0:25:20.320 --> 0:25:22.960
<v Speaker 1>succeed in getting this, is that seen in your view

0:25:23.000 --> 0:25:26.520
<v Speaker 1>as ultimately a win for shareholders? After all, Netflix shares

0:25:26.680 --> 0:25:30.800
<v Speaker 1>are lower after making this bid for Warner Brothers Discovery.

0:25:30.440 --> 0:25:32.280
<v Speaker 9>You know, I've made a lot of money in Netflix

0:25:32.480 --> 0:25:35.159
<v Speaker 9>stock over the last decade, and I love the company

0:25:35.200 --> 0:25:36.879
<v Speaker 9>and I think it's one of the best assets you

0:25:36.920 --> 0:25:39.560
<v Speaker 9>could own. But we sold some of our Netflix when

0:25:39.600 --> 0:25:43.320
<v Speaker 9>this deal went down, because the valuation of Netflix is

0:25:43.400 --> 0:25:45.919
<v Speaker 9>predicated on the business model that they have today, and

0:25:45.960 --> 0:25:49.280
<v Speaker 9>by buying warners, if they succeed, it changes the business model,

0:25:49.400 --> 0:25:52.239
<v Speaker 9>and I think they deserve a lower pe ratio if

0:25:52.280 --> 0:25:54.239
<v Speaker 9>there are going to be a traditional studio with all

0:25:54.280 --> 0:25:57.919
<v Speaker 9>this clunkiness and also lack of clarity of what that

0:25:57.960 --> 0:25:59.920
<v Speaker 9>future brings. Now, they can make great movies and it's

0:26:00.119 --> 0:26:02.159
<v Speaker 9>huge success, or they can make crap and it's a

0:26:02.160 --> 0:26:02.880
<v Speaker 9>big loss.

0:26:03.000 --> 0:26:05.120
<v Speaker 6>You know. But we saw what happened to Disney after

0:26:05.160 --> 0:26:06.080
<v Speaker 6>they absorbed Fox.

0:26:06.119 --> 0:26:09.520
<v Speaker 9>It was much harder than anybody thought to make this profitable,

0:26:09.560 --> 0:26:10.600
<v Speaker 9>and now they.

0:26:10.520 --> 0:26:12.960
<v Speaker 6>Finally are getting it together. This is years later.

0:26:13.400 --> 0:26:15.800
<v Speaker 9>So I always thought that Netflix was just bidding it

0:26:15.880 --> 0:26:20.200
<v Speaker 9>up so that, you know, Ellison would just overpay substantially

0:26:20.200 --> 0:26:22.080
<v Speaker 9>for this asset and be stuck with it in the end,

0:26:22.320 --> 0:26:24.520
<v Speaker 9>and then Netflix wins anyways, and.

0:26:24.440 --> 0:26:25.640
<v Speaker 6>That's what ultimately.

0:26:25.640 --> 0:26:27.480
<v Speaker 9>If Elson wants the asset, he's going to have to

0:26:27.480 --> 0:26:29.880
<v Speaker 9>pay ten billion more for it, and that's the only

0:26:29.920 --> 0:26:31.880
<v Speaker 9>way Warner Brothers will go for this, And.

0:26:31.880 --> 0:26:34.399
<v Speaker 6>So I do actually expect them to do that at

0:26:34.480 --> 0:26:34.919
<v Speaker 6>some point.

0:26:35.160 --> 0:26:39.000
<v Speaker 9>And then if Netflix like loses, they really win, and

0:26:39.040 --> 0:26:41.560
<v Speaker 9>that would bring the stock price back, you know, back

0:26:41.600 --> 0:26:43.439
<v Speaker 9>to one hundred and twenty and all that kind of stuff.

0:26:43.480 --> 0:26:44.760
<v Speaker 6>But it would also be great.

0:26:44.560 --> 0:26:46.920
<v Speaker 9>For their overall business because they wouldn't have to put

0:26:46.920 --> 0:26:49.200
<v Speaker 9>all this capital to work at much lower returns.

0:26:49.320 --> 0:26:52.040
<v Speaker 3>So ross do you expect what one more offer from Paramount,

0:26:52.200 --> 0:26:55.160
<v Speaker 3>another higher offer, and then that's it? And then Netflix

0:26:55.160 --> 0:26:56.320
<v Speaker 3>says I'm out.

0:26:56.880 --> 0:26:59.000
<v Speaker 9>Well, I think that you know, they got, you know,

0:26:59.080 --> 0:27:01.480
<v Speaker 9>Daddy Ellison to side off and say, you know, I'll

0:27:01.520 --> 0:27:03.960
<v Speaker 9>pay for this if my kid actually gets this deal,

0:27:04.480 --> 0:27:06.240
<v Speaker 9>not just say I'm going to pay for it, I'm

0:27:06.280 --> 0:27:08.800
<v Speaker 9>actually going to pay for it. And then secondly, what's

0:27:08.880 --> 0:27:11.360
<v Speaker 9>another ten billion to the Allison's You know, when you're

0:27:11.359 --> 0:27:14.840
<v Speaker 9>worth hundreds of billions of dollars, another ten billion is.

0:27:14.760 --> 0:27:18.080
<v Speaker 6>Likeyh, I don't know a pizza, you know costs to them.

0:27:18.400 --> 0:27:21.680
<v Speaker 9>So I think the real issue is they're vastly overpaying

0:27:21.680 --> 0:27:24.440
<v Speaker 9>for the asset, even out one hundred billion, so it's

0:27:24.480 --> 0:27:26.920
<v Speaker 9>just like ten billion down the drain that goes to Zaslav.

0:27:27.160 --> 0:27:30.800
<v Speaker 9>And boy, these these payoffs that Zaslov and the executives

0:27:30.840 --> 0:27:33.680
<v Speaker 9>getting are for hundreds of hundreds of millions of dollars.

0:27:33.880 --> 0:27:37.040
<v Speaker 9>So something's going to happen. And I just don't see

0:27:37.080 --> 0:27:41.639
<v Speaker 9>Ellison going away that easy. And I think Netflix would

0:27:41.640 --> 0:27:44.919
<v Speaker 9>be satisfied with them vastly overpaying and walking away.

0:27:45.160 --> 0:27:46.800
<v Speaker 6>So we'll see I've been wrong.

0:27:46.840 --> 0:27:48.399
<v Speaker 9>I was wrong about this in the beginning because I

0:27:48.400 --> 0:27:51.439
<v Speaker 9>didn't think Netflix would bit, But we'll see how badly

0:27:51.480 --> 0:27:55.399
<v Speaker 9>Netflix really wants to win versus just win the game

0:27:55.440 --> 0:27:57.040
<v Speaker 9>of business.

0:27:56.640 --> 0:27:59.040
<v Speaker 3>Can I ask you? And maybe this is something that's certainly,

0:27:59.080 --> 0:28:01.320
<v Speaker 3>of course near and dear our hearts as we are

0:28:01.359 --> 0:28:05.240
<v Speaker 3>in the media and news business, and that has changed

0:28:05.320 --> 0:28:08.000
<v Speaker 3>dramatically over the last ten twenty years, and I just

0:28:08.000 --> 0:28:10.560
<v Speaker 3>do wonder how this plays out and what it means

0:28:10.560 --> 0:28:13.480
<v Speaker 3>for these cable news channels or even these network channels,

0:28:13.720 --> 0:28:16.840
<v Speaker 3>where it does seem like they are being even politicized

0:28:16.960 --> 0:28:20.399
<v Speaker 3>more than ever. It's not just kind of the venue

0:28:20.400 --> 0:28:24.400
<v Speaker 3>of cable, but we're now seeing kind of regular linear

0:28:24.680 --> 0:28:28.880
<v Speaker 3>really being politicized. The problems in that as we think

0:28:28.920 --> 0:28:31.639
<v Speaker 3>about the importance of news and media in our world

0:28:32.119 --> 0:28:34.560
<v Speaker 3>or is it not so important because everybody's on social media,

0:28:34.600 --> 0:28:36.280
<v Speaker 3>although that has its problems too.

0:28:36.560 --> 0:28:39.880
<v Speaker 9>Right, right, So you know where a lot of people

0:28:39.880 --> 0:28:42.160
<v Speaker 9>are watching your Bloomberg is on YouTube, and I know

0:28:42.160 --> 0:28:44.440
<v Speaker 9>you guys have a YouTube channel that's very active because

0:28:44.720 --> 0:28:47.480
<v Speaker 9>I get all these alerts of every time you post

0:28:47.480 --> 0:28:50.600
<v Speaker 9>my stuff on YouTube. And we all know that media

0:28:50.720 --> 0:28:53.640
<v Speaker 9>organizations are smart to be reposting stuff on YouTube because

0:28:53.680 --> 0:28:56.440
<v Speaker 9>that's where people are watching. And by that matter, I'm

0:28:56.480 --> 0:29:02.040
<v Speaker 9>a big Google investor as well. I think when you

0:29:02.080 --> 0:29:05.600
<v Speaker 9>look at people my age or below, the way people

0:29:05.640 --> 0:29:09.080
<v Speaker 9>consume media is one hundred percent different news media than

0:29:09.320 --> 0:29:12.440
<v Speaker 9>my age or above. You know, so my mom is

0:29:12.440 --> 0:29:16.000
<v Speaker 9>still watching CNN, you know, but nobody I know who

0:29:16.160 --> 0:29:19.400
<v Speaker 9>is younger watches CNN unless they're in an airport. So

0:29:19.440 --> 0:29:21.160
<v Speaker 9>that's when I get most of the calls from my

0:29:21.200 --> 0:29:23.640
<v Speaker 9>friends is when I'm on CNN. Is when they're in

0:29:23.640 --> 0:29:25.560
<v Speaker 9>the airport and they're like, oh, I saw you in

0:29:25.600 --> 0:29:28.560
<v Speaker 9>the airport. You know, I'm like, wow, that's great. And

0:29:28.600 --> 0:29:31.120
<v Speaker 9>the other place I'm really popular is in gyms and

0:29:31.240 --> 0:29:34.440
<v Speaker 9>country clubs where they still watch CNBC or have it on.

0:29:35.080 --> 0:29:37.600
<v Speaker 6>But in real life, when I'm on a YouTube show.

0:29:37.760 --> 0:29:40.040
<v Speaker 9>One hundred people are like, oh I saw your YouTube show,

0:29:40.040 --> 0:29:42.600
<v Speaker 9>and da da da da da. So it's the world

0:29:42.680 --> 0:29:45.680
<v Speaker 9>has changed and the media landscape is changing. Cable is dead.

0:29:45.720 --> 0:29:49.080
<v Speaker 9>It's just a dying thing. So if I'm a news organization,

0:29:49.240 --> 0:29:51.920
<v Speaker 9>I have to repurpose my content for social media and

0:29:52.040 --> 0:29:54.640
<v Speaker 9>have five or six different platforms that I'm putting out

0:29:54.680 --> 0:29:58.280
<v Speaker 9>my content, and then I'll get the result that I

0:29:58.320 --> 0:30:01.240
<v Speaker 9>want by having enough views. But being on cable TVs.

0:30:01.560 --> 0:30:03.600
<v Speaker 1>So Russ, we only have thirty seconds left and then

0:30:03.600 --> 0:30:05.160
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna do some news and then we'll come back

0:30:05.320 --> 0:30:07.800
<v Speaker 1>and get more time with you on Tesla. But if

0:30:07.840 --> 0:30:10.640
<v Speaker 1>that's the case, then then what happens if Paramount or

0:30:10.680 --> 0:30:13.160
<v Speaker 1>if Paramount doesn't get the bid Netflix does. What happens

0:30:13.200 --> 0:30:14.560
<v Speaker 1>to the cable assets?

0:30:14.640 --> 0:30:18.280
<v Speaker 9>Very briefly, Well, it'll be spun off like Versont and

0:30:18.800 --> 0:30:23.800
<v Speaker 9>Versont is the Comcast cable assets, and you know where

0:30:23.840 --> 0:30:24.480
<v Speaker 9>that goes.

0:30:24.520 --> 0:30:26.480
<v Speaker 6>Where are these ships with no future go?

0:30:26.640 --> 0:30:29.720
<v Speaker 9>I don't know, but it's smart for those companies to

0:30:29.800 --> 0:30:34.640
<v Speaker 9>jettison those declining yet profitable assets because in five years,

0:30:35.080 --> 0:30:38.400
<v Speaker 9>maybe last, they'll probably be worth almost nothing.

0:30:38.640 --> 0:30:40.040
<v Speaker 6>So yeah, I'm.

0:30:39.840 --> 0:30:42.960
<v Speaker 9>Sad to say that, I don't think people are gonna

0:30:43.000 --> 0:30:44.880
<v Speaker 9>be watching cable TV in five and ten years.

0:30:45.120 --> 0:30:47.160
<v Speaker 1>Ros Gerber, We're gonna come back to you. We got

0:30:47.160 --> 0:30:48.640
<v Speaker 1>to leave it there for now, because the closing ball

0:30:48.760 --> 0:30:51.200
<v Speaker 1>is happening soon. Ross Gerbert, co founder, president CEO of

0:30:51.200 --> 0:30:53.040
<v Speaker 1>Gerbert Kawasaki Wealth Management.

0:30:54.600 --> 0:30:59.920
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Business Week Daily podcast, available on Apple, Spotify,

0:31:00.120 --> 0:31:03.800
<v Speaker 2>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live weekday

0:31:03.840 --> 0:31:07.880
<v Speaker 2>afternoons from two to five pm Eastern on Bloomberg dot Com,

0:31:07.920 --> 0:31:11.800
<v Speaker 2>the iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business App.

0:31:12.040 --> 0:31:14.800
<v Speaker 2>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

0:31:15.040 --> 0:31:17.200
<v Speaker 2>and always on the Bloomberg terminal