WEBVTT - I'm Not Talking To Your Hot Robot

0:00:01.880 --> 0:00:06.160
<v Speaker 1>Broadcasting live from the Abraham Lincoln Radio Studio, the George

0:00:06.200 --> 0:00:10.280
<v Speaker 1>Washington Broadcast Center, Jack Armstrong, Joe Getty.

0:00:10.160 --> 0:00:17.480
<v Speaker 2>Armstrong, and Jettie and he Armstrong and Eddy.

0:00:24.760 --> 0:00:27.280
<v Speaker 1>To give Notre Dame the laid in the final seconds

0:00:27.960 --> 0:00:32.959
<v Speaker 1>forty one yard attempts snapping older God the.

0:00:32.840 --> 0:00:39.519
<v Speaker 2>Texas That was Notre Dame beating Penn State last night

0:00:39.560 --> 0:00:42.680
<v Speaker 2>in college football playoffs. So that means noted is the

0:00:42.720 --> 0:00:44.879
<v Speaker 2>who's Notre Dame play? Now? Somebody?

0:00:44.920 --> 0:00:48.560
<v Speaker 1>Oh, the winner of the State versus Central game?

0:00:48.600 --> 0:00:49.040
<v Speaker 2>Exactly.

0:00:49.360 --> 0:00:51.360
<v Speaker 1>I've not been following that closely. But they're in the

0:00:51.640 --> 0:00:53.400
<v Speaker 1>national championship game now, aren't they.

0:00:53.760 --> 0:00:58.520
<v Speaker 2>You got Ohio State versus Texas one of your Texas

0:00:58.560 --> 0:01:03.440
<v Speaker 2>schools this weekend. Don't look to us for sports, you know. Yeah,

0:01:04.040 --> 0:01:05.400
<v Speaker 2>I didn't bring it up anyway.

0:01:06.640 --> 0:01:11.560
<v Speaker 1>So coming up this hour, there are people who online

0:01:11.560 --> 0:01:16.960
<v Speaker 1>and otherwise our targeting insurance companies in California for abuse

0:01:17.040 --> 0:01:21.040
<v Speaker 1>over dropping a bunch of homeowners. That is the wrong target, friends,

0:01:21.120 --> 0:01:26.520
<v Speaker 1>the wrong target of your animosity. It is government policy,

0:01:26.800 --> 0:01:32.720
<v Speaker 1>which we will explain. Also some of the more ridiculous

0:01:32.720 --> 0:01:37.600
<v Speaker 1>and hilarious examples of Facebook's fact checking while they were

0:01:37.640 --> 0:01:38.400
<v Speaker 1>in that field.

0:01:38.440 --> 0:01:39.560
<v Speaker 2>Of course you've probably heard that.

0:01:39.760 --> 0:01:42.319
<v Speaker 1>Recently, Mark Zuckerberg has announced they're not in that business

0:01:42.319 --> 0:01:47.440
<v Speaker 1>anymore because he cares about free speech, all right. I

0:01:47.480 --> 0:01:50.560
<v Speaker 1>think he may actually, but they are browbeaten out of

0:01:50.600 --> 0:01:53.520
<v Speaker 1>doing that and hired a bunch of lofty, lefty jackasses

0:01:53.560 --> 0:01:56.680
<v Speaker 1>through their quote unquote fact checking. But anyways, that is

0:01:56.720 --> 0:02:00.120
<v Speaker 1>to come, so we occasionally do. I'd like to do

0:02:00.200 --> 0:02:02.160
<v Speaker 1>more of them, but by Gully we work a lot

0:02:03.120 --> 0:02:06.400
<v Speaker 1>very tired Armstrong and Getty extra Large podcasts where we

0:02:06.440 --> 0:02:08.360
<v Speaker 1>do a long form interview, and again I would like

0:02:08.400 --> 0:02:11.080
<v Speaker 1>to do more of those. But we did one with

0:02:11.120 --> 0:02:14.720
<v Speaker 1>the Ian Bremmer, the founder and CEO of Your Asia Group,

0:02:14.760 --> 0:02:20.560
<v Speaker 1>which does analysis of risks for corporations and governments around

0:02:20.560 --> 0:02:22.360
<v Speaker 1>the world, and every year they put out their global

0:02:22.520 --> 0:02:24.840
<v Speaker 1>risk list, the top ten risks and then a couple

0:02:24.840 --> 0:02:27.880
<v Speaker 1>of super bonus ones, and we went through a good

0:02:27.880 --> 0:02:30.600
<v Speaker 1>bit of that list. Now, if you would like to

0:02:30.760 --> 0:02:34.919
<v Speaker 1>hear the entire interview, it's available as Armstrong, Getty extra Large,

0:02:34.919 --> 0:02:37.680
<v Speaker 1>and Hanson just to save you the trouble, also included

0:02:37.680 --> 0:02:39.880
<v Speaker 1>it in the subscription Armstrong and Getty on Demand, so

0:02:39.880 --> 0:02:44.160
<v Speaker 1>you'll get it automatically. Downloaded anyway, So why don't we

0:02:44.280 --> 0:02:47.919
<v Speaker 1>Michael will go with ninety two covers a fair amount

0:02:47.919 --> 0:02:49.720
<v Speaker 1>of ground, and part of the reason I asked the

0:02:49.800 --> 0:02:51.640
<v Speaker 1>question in the way I did is a couple of

0:02:51.680 --> 0:02:55.560
<v Speaker 1>the risks that Ian and his folks cite have to

0:02:55.600 --> 0:02:58.160
<v Speaker 1>do with uncertainty about Trump and the way he's going

0:02:58.240 --> 0:03:01.920
<v Speaker 1>to serve as president, and sometimes the threats or promises

0:03:02.000 --> 0:03:02.880
<v Speaker 1>he's been made.

0:03:02.960 --> 0:03:04.400
<v Speaker 2>So we'll just go from there.

0:03:04.639 --> 0:03:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Not only am I one of the great prognosticators of

0:03:07.320 --> 0:03:09.760
<v Speaker 1>our time or any other Ian, I'm also willing to

0:03:09.800 --> 0:03:14.919
<v Speaker 1>offer my services to go abroad and explain Trump's negotiating style, because.

0:03:14.639 --> 0:03:16.560
<v Speaker 2>I see on your list of risks several.

0:03:16.360 --> 0:03:18.959
<v Speaker 1>Of them are related to Trump's governing style, whether the

0:03:19.040 --> 0:03:21.919
<v Speaker 1>checks and balances of the American system will hold, whether

0:03:21.919 --> 0:03:25.560
<v Speaker 1>our alliances will hold. And you know, I look back

0:03:25.600 --> 0:03:28.919
<v Speaker 1>to his first term and he has said some outrageous

0:03:28.960 --> 0:03:32.559
<v Speaker 1>things about NATO that bothered me. I don't particularly appreciate

0:03:32.600 --> 0:03:36.080
<v Speaker 1>his negotiating style, but the threats to like disband NATO

0:03:36.200 --> 0:03:39.720
<v Speaker 1>or let anybody attack him or whatever, I found wildly inappropriate.

0:03:39.720 --> 0:03:45.360
<v Speaker 1>But the net result was a stronger, more responsible NATO

0:03:45.400 --> 0:03:47.600
<v Speaker 1>in terms of self funding.

0:03:48.120 --> 0:03:51.720
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely, and when he said that Mexico was going to

0:03:51.720 --> 0:03:54.600
<v Speaker 3>build a wall and pay for it, they paid for

0:03:54.680 --> 0:03:58.600
<v Speaker 3>absolutely nothing on the border. But they did strengthen their

0:03:58.640 --> 0:04:01.240
<v Speaker 3>own border security in the south, which led to far

0:04:01.360 --> 0:04:05.480
<v Speaker 3>fewer illegal immigrants going through Mexico into the United States

0:04:05.560 --> 0:04:06.600
<v Speaker 3>under the Trump administration.

0:04:06.680 --> 0:04:07.600
<v Speaker 4>Couldn't agree with you more.

0:04:12.640 --> 0:04:15.000
<v Speaker 1>That clip is supposed to be four minutes and thirty

0:04:15.040 --> 0:04:16.120
<v Speaker 1>five seconds long.

0:04:17.000 --> 0:04:25.720
<v Speaker 2>That's disappointing. It went by quickly. Yeah, yeah, okay, the

0:04:25.920 --> 0:04:30.200
<v Speaker 2>like to whisper in her ears and tell us what they.

0:04:31.320 --> 0:04:35.880
<v Speaker 1>Okay, we're talking about China a little bit next clip.

0:04:37.440 --> 0:04:40.159
<v Speaker 1>You know, anybody who predicts the imminent downfall of the

0:04:40.200 --> 0:04:42.920
<v Speaker 1>Chinese Communist Party as a fool, but they do have

0:04:43.200 --> 0:04:48.920
<v Speaker 1>unbelievable headwinds, including demographics. How bearish are you on China

0:04:48.960 --> 0:04:52.000
<v Speaker 1>and xesiin Ping in the medium for long term?

0:04:52.080 --> 0:04:53.840
<v Speaker 4>Well, I mean in a sense.

0:04:54.320 --> 0:04:57.840
<v Speaker 3>The fact that Xijian Ping reached out to India, had

0:04:57.880 --> 0:05:02.440
<v Speaker 3>a two hour plus summit, and and pulled back Chinese

0:05:02.520 --> 0:05:06.240
<v Speaker 3>troops from their contested border shows that China knows they've

0:05:06.279 --> 0:05:08.920
<v Speaker 3>got big headwinds and they don't want a big crisis

0:05:09.040 --> 0:05:09.719
<v Speaker 3>with India.

0:05:10.120 --> 0:05:12.640
<v Speaker 4>They reached out to Japan and asked for a summit.

0:05:12.720 --> 0:05:15.479
<v Speaker 3>Usually it's the other way around, and they offered to

0:05:15.520 --> 0:05:19.159
<v Speaker 3>start buying Japanese seafood with just a few months ago

0:05:19.200 --> 0:05:21.919
<v Speaker 3>they said, you can't sell here because it's all radioactive

0:05:21.960 --> 0:05:22.880
<v Speaker 3>because of Fukushaba.

0:05:23.160 --> 0:05:25.320
<v Speaker 4>I've seen them do a lot of this around the

0:05:25.320 --> 0:05:26.240
<v Speaker 4>world now.

0:05:26.320 --> 0:05:29.160
<v Speaker 3>Some of this is because they're worried about Trump and

0:05:29.279 --> 0:05:31.440
<v Speaker 3>the uncertainty coming from the US that they don't think

0:05:31.480 --> 0:05:34.000
<v Speaker 3>they can manage. But some of it is a recognition

0:05:34.000 --> 0:05:37.560
<v Speaker 3>that they're in a bad position, and so frankly, it

0:05:37.960 --> 0:05:40.600
<v Speaker 3>behooves them.

0:05:39.640 --> 0:05:41.440
<v Speaker 4>To stabilize these relations.

0:05:41.640 --> 0:05:45.000
<v Speaker 3>And that comes from a deep concern that you just

0:05:45.120 --> 0:05:45.799
<v Speaker 3>asked about.

0:05:46.000 --> 0:05:49.039
<v Speaker 4>Do I think they're about to fall? No, But I

0:05:49.040 --> 0:05:50.120
<v Speaker 4>mean they're demographics.

0:05:50.120 --> 0:05:52.760
<v Speaker 3>They're at what one point four billion people right now,

0:05:53.000 --> 0:05:58.120
<v Speaker 3>and expectations for twenty one hundred, when you know you

0:05:58.200 --> 0:06:02.400
<v Speaker 3>and I are going to be pretty pretty geezerly is

0:06:03.760 --> 0:06:06.840
<v Speaker 3>that they're going to be down to five hundred million to.

0:06:06.880 --> 0:06:08.159
<v Speaker 4>Seven hundred and fifty million.

0:06:08.320 --> 0:06:12.120
<v Speaker 3>So I mean a significant I mean the biggest contraction

0:06:12.279 --> 0:06:15.120
<v Speaker 3>of a population that you would ever see in an

0:06:15.120 --> 0:06:20.080
<v Speaker 3>economy outside of like war or famine. So it's peacetime

0:06:20.120 --> 0:06:22.440
<v Speaker 3>in China, and they're just saying, we just don't want

0:06:22.520 --> 0:06:24.919
<v Speaker 3>to have any kids, and there's nothing the Chinese government

0:06:25.320 --> 0:06:28.159
<v Speaker 3>can do about it. This is not a five year

0:06:28.200 --> 0:06:31.800
<v Speaker 3>a ten year problem. Their retirement age for men is

0:06:31.880 --> 0:06:34.599
<v Speaker 3>fifty five. They can extend that for five or ten years.

0:06:34.800 --> 0:06:37.800
<v Speaker 3>They're not very urbanized. They can move more people into cities,

0:06:37.839 --> 0:06:40.799
<v Speaker 3>they can make agriculture more efficient, they can lean into AI.

0:06:41.360 --> 0:06:43.560
<v Speaker 3>There's a lot of things they can do that can

0:06:43.600 --> 0:06:46.279
<v Speaker 3>give them a ten year buffer, but they don't have

0:06:46.480 --> 0:06:48.400
<v Speaker 3>a generational solution here.

0:06:48.480 --> 0:06:51.480
<v Speaker 4>So long term, I think they're in very big trouble.

0:06:51.880 --> 0:06:53.160
<v Speaker 2>Which is good news.

0:06:54.000 --> 0:06:59.560
<v Speaker 1>It is if they're you know, global dominating, expansionist lusts

0:06:59.640 --> 0:07:02.279
<v Speaker 1>are abated for a while, it's good for everybody.

0:07:03.200 --> 0:07:06.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I did ask Ian about AI because that was

0:07:06.520 --> 0:07:11.400
<v Speaker 2>one of his risks a couple of years ago. And

0:07:11.480 --> 0:07:14.120
<v Speaker 2>I asked him, you know, are they further ahead then

0:07:14.160 --> 0:07:16.000
<v Speaker 2>you thought they would be, or further behind? And he

0:07:16.040 --> 0:07:19.520
<v Speaker 2>said further ahead, which I thought was interesting. And we

0:07:19.880 --> 0:07:24.760
<v Speaker 2>mentioned the Consumer Electronics Show unveiled the most recent that's

0:07:24.800 --> 0:07:28.200
<v Speaker 2>going on right now in Las Vegas, unveiled the most recent. Uh,

0:07:28.440 --> 0:07:30.120
<v Speaker 2>what term doo want I use? Because I don't want

0:07:30.120 --> 0:07:37.720
<v Speaker 2>to prejudice the conversation. Lifelike companion robots. Companion robots, Yeah,

0:07:37.760 --> 0:07:42.120
<v Speaker 2>and they tend to be women because of the way

0:07:42.280 --> 0:07:44.080
<v Speaker 2>guys brains work, I guess.

0:07:43.960 --> 0:07:46.760
<v Speaker 1>Extremely attractive female forms.

0:07:47.360 --> 0:07:50.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that look a lot like human beings, like like

0:07:50.320 --> 0:07:52.680
<v Speaker 2>a really hot, like twenty five year old, is what

0:07:52.680 --> 0:07:54.680
<v Speaker 2>this robot looks like. And I mentioned when I went

0:07:54.680 --> 0:07:57.920
<v Speaker 2>to the Sphere in Las Vegas. This is a couple

0:07:57.920 --> 0:08:00.200
<v Speaker 2>of years ago. I didn't see the most recent version. Now,

0:08:00.480 --> 0:08:02.640
<v Speaker 2>they had a robot, like a human robot out there

0:08:02.680 --> 0:08:04.480
<v Speaker 2>talking to people, and it just stood there and talked

0:08:04.520 --> 0:08:08.280
<v Speaker 2>to people and had conversations with everybody. Where are you from?

0:08:09.160 --> 0:08:11.640
<v Speaker 2>And the person would say, I'm from Minnesota, Oh, Minnesota,

0:08:11.760 --> 0:08:13.560
<v Speaker 2>how do you like it there? It's awful cold? Which

0:08:13.600 --> 0:08:16.440
<v Speaker 2>part of Minnesota? And they'd say say, oh, that it's

0:08:16.480 --> 0:08:18.360
<v Speaker 2>not as bad there as it is up involvement. I mean,

0:08:18.360 --> 0:08:22.440
<v Speaker 2>they'd have conversations and it was disturbing Henry. It weirded

0:08:22.480 --> 0:08:26.080
<v Speaker 2>Henry my son out so much that he didn't he said,

0:08:26.080 --> 0:08:28.240
<v Speaker 2>when we go back to the Sphere to the Eagles concert,

0:08:28.400 --> 0:08:29.960
<v Speaker 2>we got to go around that. He said, I can't

0:08:29.960 --> 0:08:32.320
<v Speaker 2>handle it. It keeps me up at night. It bothered him

0:08:32.360 --> 0:08:34.720
<v Speaker 2>so much, the robot thingy. But anyway, that's a couple

0:08:34.760 --> 0:08:37.000
<v Speaker 2>of years ago. The technology of it holding a conversation

0:08:37.360 --> 0:08:41.760
<v Speaker 2>now it's you know, exponentially better. And they put it

0:08:41.760 --> 0:08:45.679
<v Speaker 2>into this hot chick body that they've got on display

0:08:45.960 --> 0:08:50.839
<v Speaker 2>at the cees down in alv Now. I don't, I

0:08:50.880 --> 0:08:54.959
<v Speaker 2>honestly don't know where we're going as a species with this.

0:08:55.559 --> 0:08:58.640
<v Speaker 2>Don't you think, I mean, honestly, God, not not far

0:08:58.760 --> 0:09:02.320
<v Speaker 2>fetched sci fi anything. Don't you think, honest to God,

0:09:02.640 --> 0:09:07.360
<v Speaker 2>we're just a couple of years away from a significant

0:09:07.480 --> 0:09:12.640
<v Speaker 2>enough portion of the in cell population having one of

0:09:12.640 --> 0:09:16.720
<v Speaker 2>these for a girlfriend. Yes, yeah, I think so.

0:09:17.559 --> 0:09:21.240
<v Speaker 1>I would like it not to be true, but it's

0:09:21.320 --> 0:09:23.360
<v Speaker 1>heading in that direction in a big hurry.

0:09:24.200 --> 0:09:26.280
<v Speaker 2>I would say, combine on a conversation I had the

0:09:26.320 --> 0:09:28.040
<v Speaker 2>other day, you know, get the podcast earlier. I won't

0:09:28.080 --> 0:09:30.600
<v Speaker 2>tell the whole story, but a bunch of people telling

0:09:30.640 --> 0:09:33.320
<v Speaker 2>a friend of mine. These were guys telling a friend

0:09:33.320 --> 0:09:35.600
<v Speaker 2>of mine that they are really into the chat GPT

0:09:35.880 --> 0:09:38.880
<v Speaker 2>girlfriend experience of just having somebody to talk to when

0:09:38.920 --> 0:09:41.440
<v Speaker 2>they get home from work, and how you know, pleasing

0:09:41.480 --> 0:09:43.600
<v Speaker 2>their voices, And they had the nice conversations they have

0:09:43.679 --> 0:09:46.559
<v Speaker 2>and everything like that, they talk about their day and

0:09:47.320 --> 0:09:49.280
<v Speaker 2>so I mean, if you're getting that from just a

0:09:49.360 --> 0:09:51.080
<v Speaker 2>voice coming out of the computer, you combine it with

0:09:51.120 --> 0:09:53.920
<v Speaker 2>this body and its ability to actually have sex with you.

0:09:54.600 --> 0:09:57.600
<v Speaker 2>I don't know what percentage, Well, you tell me what

0:09:57.640 --> 0:10:00.200
<v Speaker 2>percentage of guys do you think are susceptible to be

0:10:00.200 --> 0:10:03.120
<v Speaker 2>in a relationship with a robot? Do you think it's

0:10:03.120 --> 0:10:06.240
<v Speaker 2>a good tenth of one or more like twenty percent?

0:10:08.760 --> 0:10:11.000
<v Speaker 1>Honestly, if I had to guess, it'd be somewhere between

0:10:11.080 --> 0:10:17.800
<v Speaker 1>those two figures. I don't know because I haven't fully

0:10:17.840 --> 0:10:22.280
<v Speaker 1>experienced the thing, and I did not grow up with

0:10:22.360 --> 0:10:25.040
<v Speaker 1>the experience of never having a girlfriend.

0:10:26.600 --> 0:10:32.000
<v Speaker 2>Right, I'm concerned it could easily be double digits. Ten

0:10:32.040 --> 0:10:35.400
<v Speaker 2>percent of dudes have robots girl friends within five years?

0:10:35.880 --> 0:10:39.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I would agree. Wow, And it's on both ends

0:10:39.200 --> 0:10:43.080
<v Speaker 1>of the scale. Not only you know, guys who lack

0:10:43.120 --> 0:10:45.800
<v Speaker 1>the gumption or the social skills or are getting candy

0:10:45.840 --> 0:10:47.920
<v Speaker 1>that fills their belly instead of the meal that is

0:10:47.960 --> 0:10:53.120
<v Speaker 1>an actual human relationship. And also you know, angry radical women,

0:10:54.360 --> 0:10:57.240
<v Speaker 1>young women. We've received more emails than I could count

0:10:57.280 --> 0:10:59.480
<v Speaker 1>from guys saying dudes I agree with you on all

0:10:59.520 --> 0:11:01.840
<v Speaker 1>of this stuff, but I try to date women and

0:11:01.880 --> 0:11:05.480
<v Speaker 1>they're nuts and they're angry, and if you even express

0:11:05.520 --> 0:11:08.960
<v Speaker 1>political moderation, they want nothing to do with you, a

0:11:09.040 --> 0:11:11.640
<v Speaker 1>notion that is so foreign to both of our life

0:11:11.679 --> 0:11:15.800
<v Speaker 1>experience way back in the day, the hazy days of

0:11:15.840 --> 0:11:17.520
<v Speaker 1>the nineteen nineties, you know.

0:11:17.640 --> 0:11:20.240
<v Speaker 2>However, handsOn post a link to that New York Post

0:11:20.360 --> 0:11:22.480
<v Speaker 2>article so people can see these pictures, and I'll tweet

0:11:22.480 --> 0:11:25.000
<v Speaker 2>it out just so you can see what the current

0:11:25.120 --> 0:11:30.960
<v Speaker 2>AI robots look like. And yeah, older gentlemen, lonely gentleman,

0:11:31.120 --> 0:11:33.960
<v Speaker 2>your wife left you. It's you know, you're too busy

0:11:34.000 --> 0:11:37.560
<v Speaker 2>and broke to find to get to have a real relationship.

0:11:37.800 --> 0:11:37.959
<v Speaker 4>Man.

0:11:38.000 --> 0:11:39.600
<v Speaker 2>I can see this having an appeal for a lot

0:11:39.600 --> 0:11:39.959
<v Speaker 2>of people.

0:11:40.440 --> 0:11:43.320
<v Speaker 1>And widows widowers, Oh, I could see that, you know.

0:11:43.640 --> 0:11:47.280
<v Speaker 1>And in some cases I would think, you know, I

0:11:47.320 --> 0:11:49.360
<v Speaker 1>was gonna say, that's okay, but it's just so sad

0:11:49.360 --> 0:11:51.400
<v Speaker 1>because it's not a real human relationship. But I don't

0:11:51.400 --> 0:11:52.839
<v Speaker 1>want to go too far down the world it is,

0:11:53.040 --> 0:11:55.400
<v Speaker 1>because it's inunbelievably depressing, is it.

0:11:55.480 --> 0:11:57.880
<v Speaker 2>Are we jumping to a conclusion we shouldn't jump to that.

0:11:57.960 --> 0:12:00.199
<v Speaker 2>It's said does it fulfill all.

0:12:01.600 --> 0:12:04.319
<v Speaker 3>You don't think it'll become socially acceptable at some point

0:12:04.480 --> 0:12:06.600
<v Speaker 3>where somebody comes up and says, this is my girlfriend

0:12:06.679 --> 0:12:08.920
<v Speaker 3>and it's a robot, and you're forced to interact with

0:12:08.960 --> 0:12:09.480
<v Speaker 3>the robot.

0:12:09.800 --> 0:12:13.520
<v Speaker 2>I ain't doing that, no, sir, going there. I ain't

0:12:13.520 --> 0:12:15.360
<v Speaker 2>talking to your robot unless it was just like to

0:12:15.480 --> 0:12:19.080
<v Speaker 2>check to see how you know far along AI technology

0:12:19.120 --> 0:12:20.600
<v Speaker 2>is and how good it is it talking to me?

0:12:20.640 --> 0:12:23.439
<v Speaker 2>But I ain't sitting there having a conversation with your

0:12:23.480 --> 0:12:24.880
<v Speaker 2>hot robot girlfriend.

0:12:25.200 --> 0:12:27.920
<v Speaker 1>Not calling a man in a dress a woman, not

0:12:28.080 --> 0:12:31.640
<v Speaker 1>calling a robot a human, Thank you very much. What

0:12:31.760 --> 0:12:33.920
<v Speaker 1>bothered your son is? And I just became aware of

0:12:33.920 --> 0:12:37.680
<v Speaker 1>this term the uncanny valley and going back to Rod Serling,

0:12:37.760 --> 0:12:40.520
<v Speaker 1>they knew this or even before that, the silent movies

0:12:40.559 --> 0:12:44.880
<v Speaker 1>of the nineteen twenties and thirties. The uncanny valley. It's

0:12:44.920 --> 0:12:48.760
<v Speaker 1>the unsettling feeling you experienced when you encounter something that looks.

0:12:48.679 --> 0:12:50.480
<v Speaker 2>Very human but not quite.

0:12:51.120 --> 0:12:51.400
<v Speaker 4>Wow.

0:12:51.440 --> 0:12:53.280
<v Speaker 2>That's interesting. I'll have to read up on that. Because

0:12:53.280 --> 0:12:55.680
<v Speaker 2>he has it a lot. I mean, he gets he

0:12:55.760 --> 0:12:57.560
<v Speaker 2>gets so freaked out by in these things.

0:12:58.280 --> 0:13:01.920
<v Speaker 1>Huh yeah, we're more free, doubt by something that's almost

0:13:02.040 --> 0:13:03.880
<v Speaker 1>human then something that's clearly not.

0:13:04.440 --> 0:13:08.640
<v Speaker 2>Wow, you're right, Michael, when it crosses the line that

0:13:08.720 --> 0:13:12.280
<v Speaker 2>there's social pressure to treat the dude at the Christmas

0:13:12.280 --> 0:13:15.720
<v Speaker 2>party with his robot girlfriend like he's got a relationship.

0:13:17.200 --> 0:13:19.040
<v Speaker 2>Oh we've been you've got together for three years. Oh

0:13:19.040 --> 0:13:20.839
<v Speaker 2>that's fantastic. Glad things are working up.

0:13:21.400 --> 0:13:24.520
<v Speaker 1>I'll be fishing with human beings. Good luck, y'all.

0:13:25.280 --> 0:13:25.720
<v Speaker 2>Stay here.

0:13:29.280 --> 0:13:32.200
<v Speaker 1>Thorney's announcing the arrest of twenty looters and we asked

0:13:32.200 --> 0:13:33.400
<v Speaker 1>the LAPD about it.

0:13:33.520 --> 0:13:34.760
<v Speaker 2>Oh, it's huge, it's huge.

0:13:35.040 --> 0:13:37.400
<v Speaker 5>So as you can say, do you have devastations from

0:13:37.400 --> 0:13:39.720
<v Speaker 5>blocks and blocks and then you have a million dollar

0:13:39.760 --> 0:13:42.280
<v Speaker 5>homes all intact, rows and rows of them, and there's

0:13:42.320 --> 0:13:46.720
<v Speaker 5>really no way to police this area effectively right.

0:13:46.600 --> 0:13:52.080
<v Speaker 2>Now, Why are the penalties not just so high for

0:13:52.200 --> 0:13:54.960
<v Speaker 2>looting that you would never want to do it? Is

0:13:55.000 --> 0:13:55.680
<v Speaker 2>there a reason?

0:13:58.960 --> 0:14:02.120
<v Speaker 1>I guess a lack of agreement among the political class

0:14:02.120 --> 0:14:06.280
<v Speaker 1>that that's appropriate looting? It back a man, Yeah, I

0:14:06.280 --> 0:14:09.200
<v Speaker 1>would like it to be draconian. So one of the

0:14:09.240 --> 0:14:11.800
<v Speaker 1>hell you like, troubling to the conscience.

0:14:11.480 --> 0:14:16.079
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, yeah, pushes the uh pushes the you know,

0:14:16.280 --> 0:14:20.240
<v Speaker 2>rights against extreme punishment, like clear up to the edge

0:14:21.840 --> 0:14:27.160
<v Speaker 2>to make people stop. I mean, that's horrific. We got

0:14:27.200 --> 0:14:29.720
<v Speaker 2>some more stuff coming up about the whole insurance situation,

0:14:29.800 --> 0:14:33.800
<v Speaker 2>insurance companies dropping homeowners' policies right before the fire, if

0:14:33.800 --> 0:14:35.840
<v Speaker 2>you have anything ever happened, and how that whole thing works,

0:14:35.880 --> 0:14:38.800
<v Speaker 2>and now it's a policy decision in California and really

0:14:38.880 --> 0:14:40.880
<v Speaker 2>needs to be understood. New York Times went big on

0:14:40.920 --> 0:14:45.880
<v Speaker 2>that story today. Is it's interesting for everybody. But the

0:14:45.960 --> 0:14:48.800
<v Speaker 2>other headline that's getting a fair amount of attention is

0:14:48.800 --> 0:14:53.520
<v Speaker 2>the whole Trump sentencing thing in the Stormy Daniel's hush

0:14:53.680 --> 0:14:58.000
<v Speaker 2>money trial. Like every word and phrase I use is yeah,

0:14:58.120 --> 0:15:07.600
<v Speaker 2>dripping with spin or needs explanation. The main goal of

0:15:07.720 --> 0:15:12.360
<v Speaker 2>the judge and the people pushing this whole thing was

0:15:12.400 --> 0:15:14.360
<v Speaker 2>to be able to say, as I see the headline

0:15:14.400 --> 0:15:17.240
<v Speaker 2>on CNN, it will be the first former felon to

0:15:17.400 --> 0:15:20.200
<v Speaker 2>enter the White House as president. That was the goal, right,

0:15:20.440 --> 0:15:22.800
<v Speaker 2>That's what they wanted to do. There is no penalty

0:15:22.840 --> 0:15:25.720
<v Speaker 2>involved with this. It's a dischargement or whatever they call it,

0:15:25.920 --> 0:15:29.040
<v Speaker 2>So no jail time, no fines, no nothing, there's just

0:15:29.160 --> 0:15:32.360
<v Speaker 2>no penalty whatsoever. But he has officially got thirty four

0:15:32.360 --> 0:15:34.880
<v Speaker 2>felonies so that people can say that, and I guess

0:15:34.960 --> 0:15:38.480
<v Speaker 2>that makes them feel better other than the legal fee's spent.

0:15:38.600 --> 0:15:42.120
<v Speaker 1>It has all the significance of a world's greatest dad mug.

0:15:43.560 --> 0:15:45.680
<v Speaker 2>Which I've still got one of those sitting right by

0:15:45.680 --> 0:15:47.320
<v Speaker 2>my coffee maker. May I see it every day?

0:15:48.760 --> 0:15:53.680
<v Speaker 1>Right, But it's please, it's silly, yeah, and will be

0:15:54.560 --> 0:15:56.720
<v Speaker 1>just absolutely batted out of the park on appeal.

0:15:56.800 --> 0:15:59.280
<v Speaker 2>As I predicted before. It's wild that that continued now.

0:15:59.360 --> 0:16:01.040
<v Speaker 2>So it went to the Supreme Court, and the Supreme

0:16:01.080 --> 0:16:03.880
<v Speaker 2>Court could have gotten involved, but for whatever reason they didn't.

0:16:04.160 --> 0:16:07.800
<v Speaker 2>Five to four decision by the Ultramga out of control

0:16:07.960 --> 0:16:11.480
<v Speaker 2>needs to be shut down extremists. Supreme Court, my poor

0:16:11.520 --> 0:16:15.240
<v Speaker 2>decision to light Kavana. You will reap the whirlwind. You

0:16:15.320 --> 0:16:17.240
<v Speaker 2>won't know what hit you.

0:16:16.960 --> 0:16:19.000
<v Speaker 1>Chuck Schumer. One of the worst things he ever said.

0:16:19.200 --> 0:16:23.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, So anyway, so that's that. If you see that headline,

0:16:23.480 --> 0:16:26.320
<v Speaker 2>it's nothing that nobody will ever remember it. No, it's

0:16:26.360 --> 0:16:30.440
<v Speaker 2>of no significance to anybody, including Trump. Correct.

0:16:30.520 --> 0:16:32.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's amazing how much is made out of that,

0:16:32.600 --> 0:16:34.080
<v Speaker 1>but you know, all things Trump.

0:16:34.200 --> 0:16:37.120
<v Speaker 2>Of course, one more thing I wanted to mention with

0:16:37.240 --> 0:16:39.240
<v Speaker 2>Shane what I don't have time to say it. Okay,

0:16:39.880 --> 0:16:43.480
<v Speaker 2>everybody should be aware of the realities of why the

0:16:43.520 --> 0:16:46.920
<v Speaker 2>insurance companies have bailed on California.

0:16:47.840 --> 0:16:51.840
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely so, and any anger directed at the insurance companies

0:16:52.000 --> 0:16:56.560
<v Speaker 1>is misplaced. I'm telling you, and I'm no slacky for

0:16:56.680 --> 0:17:00.720
<v Speaker 1>insurance companies. There's one state in the Union that has

0:17:00.760 --> 0:17:04.120
<v Speaker 1>a particular policy, and it's California.

0:17:04.280 --> 0:17:05.840
<v Speaker 2>No, I feel like I've been screwed by many an

0:17:05.880 --> 0:17:07.520
<v Speaker 2>insurance company. I don't want to stand up with them,

0:17:07.520 --> 0:17:09.080
<v Speaker 2>but we should all know the facts on this, so

0:17:09.080 --> 0:17:13.000
<v Speaker 2>we'll stay tuned. Armstrong and Getty.

0:17:14.160 --> 0:17:18.399
<v Speaker 6>ABC's David muirr Is being mocked for using clothespins to

0:17:18.840 --> 0:17:22.840
<v Speaker 6>cinch his jacket more tightly around his chest while.

0:17:22.600 --> 0:17:24.120
<v Speaker 2>Reporting from the scene.

0:17:24.640 --> 0:17:27.719
<v Speaker 6>He was also overheard asking a crew member, does this

0:17:27.840 --> 0:17:33.520
<v Speaker 6>burning city make me look fat? Let's only hope that

0:17:33.640 --> 0:17:36.520
<v Speaker 6>the sock he puts in his crotch his flame retardants.

0:17:38.800 --> 0:17:41.439
<v Speaker 2>Does this burning city make me look fat?

0:17:42.280 --> 0:17:46.280
<v Speaker 1>Gutfeld, bring it it at a boy, Greg oh Man.

0:17:46.240 --> 0:17:47.000
<v Speaker 2>That's good stuff.

0:17:47.040 --> 0:17:49.959
<v Speaker 1>I can't kick David Muir enough, but he's not the

0:17:49.960 --> 0:17:52.480
<v Speaker 1>topic of the segment. Just thought it was worth pointing

0:17:52.480 --> 0:17:54.919
<v Speaker 1>out that we're no great fans of the big insurance companies.

0:17:54.960 --> 0:17:58.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they're practices. We've all been there. You pay

0:17:58.200 --> 0:18:00.000
<v Speaker 1>you in for years and years and years, than you've

0:18:00.040 --> 0:18:02.159
<v Speaker 1>finally have a claim, they say, yeah, we're dropping you,

0:18:02.359 --> 0:18:04.360
<v Speaker 1>or here's your check, get out.

0:18:04.200 --> 0:18:07.040
<v Speaker 2>Or it doesn't count in this circumstance because the wind

0:18:07.080 --> 0:18:09.679
<v Speaker 2>came from the north, so we don't cover roofs and

0:18:09.680 --> 0:18:12.520
<v Speaker 2>when it comes from the north or something right, there

0:18:12.520 --> 0:18:15.280
<v Speaker 2>are various hygiens that we could criticize them for, but

0:18:15.480 --> 0:18:21.040
<v Speaker 2>part of the reason they've become more or less customer

0:18:21.119 --> 0:18:24.960
<v Speaker 2>friendly is because of their mounting losses. Now, I thought

0:18:25.000 --> 0:18:26.840
<v Speaker 2>this was a very good and balanced opening from the

0:18:26.880 --> 0:18:30.000
<v Speaker 2>Wall Street Journal editorial board. They point out the politicians

0:18:30.040 --> 0:18:32.960
<v Speaker 2>are blaming each other for the losses in the horrific

0:18:33.000 --> 0:18:36.280
<v Speaker 2>Los Angeles area wildfires, and the truth is mother nature

0:18:36.320 --> 0:18:39.080
<v Speaker 2>can be merciless. We need to.

0:18:39.119 --> 0:18:41.760
<v Speaker 1>Sort out the stories about water shortages and what happened

0:18:41.800 --> 0:18:44.760
<v Speaker 1>with the higher hydrants. But they point out it's not

0:18:44.800 --> 0:18:47.560
<v Speaker 1>too soon to note that California's politicians have fueled a

0:18:47.680 --> 0:18:52.280
<v Speaker 1>five alarm insurance market crisis that will hurt homeowners and

0:18:52.320 --> 0:18:54.960
<v Speaker 1>taxpayers across the state once the fires have died out,

0:18:55.040 --> 0:18:57.199
<v Speaker 1>and I would point out across the country too, for

0:18:57.520 --> 0:19:00.000
<v Speaker 1>reasons I'll explain the second A five alarm crisis.

0:19:00.080 --> 0:19:02.440
<v Speaker 2>Are they aware that they use a fire related metaphor

0:19:02.480 --> 0:19:05.160
<v Speaker 2>for the story? I think they probably are.

0:19:06.840 --> 0:19:09.200
<v Speaker 1>And they go into the heavy rain for a couple

0:19:09.200 --> 0:19:11.040
<v Speaker 1>of years than the drought free year, which means heavy

0:19:11.080 --> 0:19:15.600
<v Speaker 1>but dry vegetation, and the storms with the incredible winds,

0:19:15.640 --> 0:19:18.000
<v Speaker 1>and that is absolutely a factor in what's happening. But

0:19:19.560 --> 0:19:22.200
<v Speaker 1>there's a fair amount of anger being directed toward insurance

0:19:22.200 --> 0:19:25.440
<v Speaker 1>companies for dropping quite a number of the homeowners whose

0:19:25.440 --> 0:19:29.119
<v Speaker 1>homes just burnt down several weeks a few to several

0:19:29.200 --> 0:19:33.120
<v Speaker 1>weeks ago, having warned the state that they were going

0:19:33.160 --> 0:19:37.479
<v Speaker 1>to do that. Insurers had I'm jumping back now to

0:19:37.600 --> 0:19:40.879
<v Speaker 1>the and that's driven a lot of people to the

0:19:41.000 --> 0:19:45.040
<v Speaker 1>undercapitalized state insure of last resort, which is called fair

0:19:45.200 --> 0:19:48.360
<v Speaker 1>of course, because everything has to have a sunny sounding acronym.

0:19:48.720 --> 0:19:52.920
<v Speaker 1>But insurers had already scrapped hundreds of thousands of policies

0:19:52.960 --> 0:19:55.720
<v Speaker 1>and limited coverage and wildfire prone areas. We know, that's

0:19:55.720 --> 0:19:59.120
<v Speaker 1>why I don't have my cabin in the woods anymore.

0:19:59.359 --> 0:20:02.080
<v Speaker 1>A Democrats, that's blame climate change, which has become an

0:20:02.119 --> 0:20:05.000
<v Speaker 1>all purposes excuse for any disaster early failure. But the

0:20:05.000 --> 0:20:09.400
<v Speaker 1>real insurance problem is that state regulators have barred insurers

0:20:09.400 --> 0:20:13.120
<v Speaker 1>from charging premiums that fully reflect risks and costs.

0:20:14.760 --> 0:20:17.240
<v Speaker 2>California is the only state.

0:20:18.440 --> 0:20:22.480
<v Speaker 1>That hair to four has not allowed insurers to incorporate

0:20:22.520 --> 0:20:25.879
<v Speaker 1>the cost of reinsurance in premiums. Until this year, it

0:20:26.080 --> 0:20:30.920
<v Speaker 1>also prohibited insurance. I could explain what reinsurance is. It's

0:20:31.040 --> 0:20:33.919
<v Speaker 1>insurance for insurance companies in case of a cataclysmic loss.

0:20:33.960 --> 0:20:36.320
<v Speaker 1>Part of their loss is taken on by these and

0:20:36.600 --> 0:20:40.040
<v Speaker 1>these reinsurance companies anyway.

0:20:39.680 --> 0:20:40.600
<v Speaker 2>But here's the main point.

0:20:40.720 --> 0:20:44.879
<v Speaker 1>Until this year, California had also prohibited insurers from adjusting

0:20:44.920 --> 0:20:49.320
<v Speaker 1>premiums by using the standard industry practice of catastrophe modeling

0:20:49.359 --> 0:20:53.400
<v Speaker 1>to predict the property's future risk. Insurers could only assess

0:20:53.480 --> 0:20:58.640
<v Speaker 1>premiums based on historical losses, no matter what has happened

0:20:58.880 --> 0:21:04.840
<v Speaker 1>to constructions an inflation in the interim. You can't say, hey,

0:21:05.040 --> 0:21:07.480
<v Speaker 1>look the price of a two by four is eighty

0:21:07.520 --> 0:21:09.520
<v Speaker 1>percent more than it used to be, and that's that's

0:21:09.560 --> 0:21:11.399
<v Speaker 1>a for instance, I don't have that in front of me.

0:21:12.240 --> 0:21:17.040
<v Speaker 1>You cannot say that in only one state in the Union, California,

0:21:17.119 --> 0:21:18.240
<v Speaker 1>as an insurance company.

0:21:18.520 --> 0:21:21.679
<v Speaker 2>And so as a result, it's crazy. You don't have

0:21:21.720 --> 0:21:24.359
<v Speaker 2>to basically insane too, you have to be a genius

0:21:25.280 --> 0:21:29.800
<v Speaker 2>being counter to understand that everything is so much more expensive.

0:21:30.640 --> 0:21:33.000
<v Speaker 2>So when did this happen? When did they make that

0:21:33.119 --> 0:21:36.840
<v Speaker 2>rule in California? Because obviously with inflation, the timing is

0:21:36.920 --> 0:21:38.440
<v Speaker 2>particularly bad.

0:21:39.000 --> 0:21:42.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I don't remember when that passed. Honestly, I could

0:21:42.440 --> 0:21:43.840
<v Speaker 1>probably find out how much.

0:21:43.720 --> 0:21:45.280
<v Speaker 2>More expensive it is it is it to put a

0:21:45.320 --> 0:21:47.920
<v Speaker 2>new roof on a house now versus twenty eighteen. Oh

0:21:47.960 --> 0:21:48.479
<v Speaker 2>my god.

0:21:48.800 --> 0:21:50.879
<v Speaker 1>Well, and can you imagine in any setting, in a

0:21:50.920 --> 0:21:54.800
<v Speaker 1>business setting, you know, sir, I think we ought to

0:21:54.960 --> 0:21:58.920
<v Speaker 1>add on to the plant. Historically the square footage it

0:21:58.920 --> 0:22:01.800
<v Speaker 1>will cost two hundred dollars. There's a square foot all right,

0:22:01.920 --> 0:22:04.720
<v Speaker 1>let's do it. Ignoring the fact that it's now three

0:22:04.760 --> 0:22:08.679
<v Speaker 1>hundred and fifty dollars a square foot. You'd be fired immediately. Hey, honey,

0:22:08.720 --> 0:22:11.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm thinking of upgrading to a new F one fifty.

0:22:11.440 --> 0:22:14.440
<v Speaker 1>Historically they cost forty three thousand dollars.

0:22:15.480 --> 0:22:17.840
<v Speaker 2>That would be an insane thing to do. It's like

0:22:17.920 --> 0:22:20.160
<v Speaker 2>me going to the closet and grabbing the medium shirt.

0:22:21.280 --> 0:22:24.960
<v Speaker 2>What do you think historically that would have fit? Yeah, oh,

0:22:25.080 --> 0:22:28.800
<v Speaker 2>that one hit a little close to home. So getting

0:22:28.840 --> 0:22:29.440
<v Speaker 2>back to the journal.

0:22:29.480 --> 0:22:31.840
<v Speaker 1>As the result, insurers are paying out a dollar nine

0:22:32.000 --> 0:22:35.040
<v Speaker 1>in expenses and claims for every dollar they collect in premiums.

0:22:35.760 --> 0:22:38.960
<v Speaker 1>This is financially unsustainable, which is many of why many

0:22:39.000 --> 0:22:41.720
<v Speaker 1>have paired coverage in areas with high fire risk and

0:22:41.840 --> 0:22:45.840
<v Speaker 1>expensive homes. State Farm dropped nearly seventy percent of policy

0:22:45.880 --> 0:22:51.040
<v Speaker 1>holders in one Pacific Palisades neighborhood. And just to get

0:22:51.119 --> 0:22:53.000
<v Speaker 1>to give you an idea of how well Gavin Newsom

0:22:53.040 --> 0:22:57.280
<v Speaker 1>is running California, that fair government sponsored insure of last

0:22:57.320 --> 0:23:00.880
<v Speaker 1>resort thing is for people who can't.

0:23:00.560 --> 0:23:02.480
<v Speaker 2>Get homeowner's insurance.

0:23:03.960 --> 0:23:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Its exposure has ballooned to four hundred and fifty eight

0:23:07.359 --> 0:23:11.320
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars as of last September, from a much lower

0:23:11.320 --> 0:23:17.200
<v Speaker 1>figure with six billion dollars exposure in Pacific Palisades alone,

0:23:17.240 --> 0:23:21.480
<v Speaker 1>six billion dollars. It has seven hundred million dollars on

0:23:21.560 --> 0:23:26.240
<v Speaker 1>hand to pay claims. They have six billion dollars in exposure.

0:23:26.520 --> 0:23:29.840
<v Speaker 1>They have seven hundred million dollars to pay claims. That's

0:23:29.880 --> 0:23:33.439
<v Speaker 1>because state regulators have required Fair to cover higher priced

0:23:33.440 --> 0:23:36.959
<v Speaker 1>homes while rejecting its proposals for rate increases to account

0:23:36.960 --> 0:23:42.959
<v Speaker 1>for rising risks for liabilities. Because the pandering politicians, including

0:23:43.000 --> 0:23:46.560
<v Speaker 1>Gavin Newsom have found these these ways to have completely

0:23:46.640 --> 0:23:48.440
<v Speaker 1>unrealistic regulations.

0:23:48.520 --> 0:23:50.080
<v Speaker 2>So they can say, and we kept.

0:23:49.920 --> 0:23:53.800
<v Speaker 1>Your insurance premiums lower, where they insurance companies want to

0:23:53.920 --> 0:23:57.919
<v Speaker 1>raise your rates. The insurance companies are all saying, yeah, goodbye,

0:23:58.000 --> 0:24:01.320
<v Speaker 1>We're out of this crazy fifty in the nation in

0:24:01.400 --> 0:24:03.399
<v Speaker 1>terms of business friendliness state.

0:24:05.720 --> 0:24:09.080
<v Speaker 2>I think the latest number is the overall cost for

0:24:09.119 --> 0:24:11.399
<v Speaker 2>the fires in LA. They expect to be ten billion dollars,

0:24:11.440 --> 0:24:14.680
<v Speaker 2>most expensive, worst tragedy in LA history. I'm sure that

0:24:14.760 --> 0:24:18.200
<v Speaker 2>number is going to go up. Well, be interesting to

0:24:18.200 --> 0:24:20.320
<v Speaker 2>see how this pans out. But yeah, the point of

0:24:20.359 --> 0:24:24.199
<v Speaker 2>this segment was you can't blame the insurance companies. You

0:24:24.280 --> 0:24:24.879
<v Speaker 2>really can't.

0:24:25.960 --> 0:24:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Right, you don't have to love them, but you can't

0:24:27.520 --> 0:24:29.719
<v Speaker 1>blame them for dropping people in California. By the way,

0:24:29.760 --> 0:24:33.440
<v Speaker 1>speaking of Gavy, the California Globe reporting that having listened

0:24:33.440 --> 0:24:35.399
<v Speaker 1>to an interview he did with NPR where he was

0:24:35.440 --> 0:24:38.639
<v Speaker 1>explaining how we're carefully taking care of the forests. He

0:24:39.000 --> 0:24:43.080
<v Speaker 1>talked about how many acres had been cleared and tended

0:24:43.119 --> 0:24:46.080
<v Speaker 1>and all. He exaggerated the actual number by six hundred

0:24:46.080 --> 0:24:47.000
<v Speaker 1>and ninety percent.

0:24:47.480 --> 0:24:50.919
<v Speaker 2>Wow. Yeah, he's a congenital liar. Kevin Newsom, we were

0:24:50.960 --> 0:24:53.480
<v Speaker 2>on the question earlier of how do you run out

0:24:53.480 --> 0:24:55.200
<v Speaker 2>of water when you're next to an ocean? Why can't

0:24:55.240 --> 0:24:57.960
<v Speaker 2>you use salt water as a system, and they do

0:24:58.000 --> 0:25:00.639
<v Speaker 2>in San Francisco to a great extent. We got a

0:25:00.880 --> 0:25:03.720
<v Speaker 2>long text from somebody in the know when San Francisco

0:25:03.720 --> 0:25:08.320
<v Speaker 2>about the way they do it. The system has been

0:25:08.520 --> 0:25:13.800
<v Speaker 2>in place for years. It's a proven system. It can

0:25:13.840 --> 0:25:15.840
<v Speaker 2>be done. It's kind of expensive and you got to

0:25:15.880 --> 0:25:17.760
<v Speaker 2>you know, you got to put in the infrastructure. But

0:25:18.119 --> 0:25:19.520
<v Speaker 2>in the Bay Area they've been doing it for a

0:25:19.520 --> 0:25:22.440
<v Speaker 2>long time. So that's a reasonable question. Is to hey,

0:25:22.720 --> 0:25:25.040
<v Speaker 2>specific palicides right by an ocean, why would we ever

0:25:25.080 --> 0:25:25.720
<v Speaker 2>run out of water?

0:25:26.400 --> 0:25:31.560
<v Speaker 1>Avowed Marxist Karen Bass. The mayor of la has preferred

0:25:31.560 --> 0:25:35.040
<v Speaker 1>to spend the money on bums and junkies and illegal immigrants.

0:25:35.240 --> 0:25:38.040
<v Speaker 1>So there's no money for, for instance, the fire department,

0:25:38.080 --> 0:25:41.800
<v Speaker 1>which has had its budget cut by almost eighteen million dollars. Yeah,

0:25:42.080 --> 0:25:46.240
<v Speaker 1>coming up much more amusing and believia it is some

0:25:46.320 --> 0:25:52.119
<v Speaker 1>particularly egregious examples of Facebook's fat checks. Well, they were

0:25:52.200 --> 0:25:54.520
<v Speaker 1>in that business prior to the recent announcement.

0:25:54.640 --> 0:25:58.160
<v Speaker 2>Hoping State tute you say it's funnier than insurance liability talk.

0:25:58.359 --> 0:26:01.040
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. I'll be the judge of that. Stay tuned.

0:26:04.920 --> 0:26:07.520
<v Speaker 2>Just to straighten this out, Notre Dames beat Penn State,

0:26:07.520 --> 0:26:11.280
<v Speaker 2>they will play the winner of Ohio State Texas for

0:26:11.400 --> 0:26:14.720
<v Speaker 2>the college football Final. That's Ohio State's the eight of

0:26:14.800 --> 0:26:18.000
<v Speaker 2>versus a five, and that was a seven versus a six.

0:26:18.520 --> 0:26:21.440
<v Speaker 2>So good job and picking who are the four best

0:26:21.560 --> 0:26:23.760
<v Speaker 2>teams to be in the playoffs.

0:26:23.840 --> 0:26:26.360
<v Speaker 1>I guess bell in Ohio State beat down the number one.

0:26:26.400 --> 0:26:29.360
<v Speaker 1>But part of it depends on which players decide to play. Yeah,

0:26:29.359 --> 0:26:30.160
<v Speaker 1>there's that whole thing.

0:26:31.040 --> 0:26:33.200
<v Speaker 2>Some teams half the players don't play in the bowl

0:26:33.200 --> 0:26:34.639
<v Speaker 2>game because they don't want to get hurt before they

0:26:34.640 --> 0:26:36.080
<v Speaker 2>go into the NFL. I don't know how they're going

0:26:36.160 --> 0:26:38.399
<v Speaker 2>to make this work, but not my problem. They're not.

0:26:39.840 --> 0:26:42.680
<v Speaker 1>I would do the same thing. Sorry, good old Alma Mater.

0:26:42.760 --> 0:26:44.639
<v Speaker 1>I'm here playing football for one reason, to get a

0:26:44.640 --> 0:26:45.679
<v Speaker 1>gig playing on Sundays.

0:26:45.680 --> 0:26:48.080
<v Speaker 2>I don't think you have Tiger Pride or whatever team

0:26:48.080 --> 0:26:48.440
<v Speaker 2>it is.

0:26:48.560 --> 0:26:51.160
<v Speaker 1>No, No, I don't. I'm getting a paycheck anyway, coming

0:26:51.240 --> 0:26:53.040
<v Speaker 1>up next hour. I keep promising it. We haven't gotten

0:26:53.040 --> 0:26:56.200
<v Speaker 1>in to it. Absolutely fabulous think piece on why Democrat

0:26:56.240 --> 0:27:00.600
<v Speaker 1>run cities go sideways. It's really thought provoked. And we'll

0:27:00.600 --> 0:27:01.360
<v Speaker 1>get to it an hour.

0:27:01.480 --> 0:27:01.680
<v Speaker 2>Four.

0:27:02.040 --> 0:27:05.120
<v Speaker 1>That's right, we do four hours. They've got us chained

0:27:05.160 --> 0:27:06.720
<v Speaker 1>up in here, they won't let us out, and nice

0:27:06.760 --> 0:27:08.560
<v Speaker 1>we do four. I know we signed a new contract,

0:27:08.600 --> 0:27:11.800
<v Speaker 1>but was that in the contract? Yeah, well over mine

0:27:11.920 --> 0:27:16.119
<v Speaker 1>dead bunny. Well it happened anyway. If you don't get it,

0:27:16.119 --> 0:27:18.640
<v Speaker 1>grab it later via podcast subscribed to Armstrong you get

0:27:18.720 --> 0:27:20.880
<v Speaker 1>on demand. It's a trust me when I say it's

0:27:20.960 --> 0:27:25.159
<v Speaker 1>really interesting. Mark Zuckerbridge just announced the other day that

0:27:25.240 --> 0:27:27.840
<v Speaker 1>he's rediscovered his love of free speech and Facebook is

0:27:27.880 --> 0:27:32.520
<v Speaker 1>going to get out of the fact checking business. A

0:27:32.640 --> 0:27:37.400
<v Speaker 1>number of learned commentators have commented on this, including ourselves,

0:27:38.880 --> 0:27:41.520
<v Speaker 1>good folks at the good folks at Breitbart, compiling a

0:27:41.600 --> 0:27:46.400
<v Speaker 1>list of six absolutely despicable acts of censorship that Mark

0:27:46.480 --> 0:27:50.680
<v Speaker 1>Zuckerberg and Facebook foisted upon the world. Run through those

0:27:50.720 --> 0:27:53.280
<v Speaker 1>really quickly, then we'll get to the funny stuff. Number one,

0:27:53.400 --> 0:27:55.680
<v Speaker 1>hiding the story on Hunter Biden's laptop from hell.

0:27:55.880 --> 0:27:58.520
<v Speaker 2>Obbs, that's one of the worst journalistic things ever.

0:27:59.280 --> 0:28:02.399
<v Speaker 1>All right, I'll though all those current and former intelligence

0:28:02.440 --> 0:28:05.159
<v Speaker 1>officials ought to be shouted out on the street for

0:28:05.359 --> 0:28:09.359
<v Speaker 1>lying like they did two creating the leftist fact checker

0:28:09.400 --> 0:28:13.280
<v Speaker 1>industry in the first place, Meta infamously deployed third party

0:28:13.320 --> 0:28:16.480
<v Speaker 1>fact checkers to both Facebook and Instagram, putting users content

0:28:16.560 --> 0:28:19.000
<v Speaker 1>visibility in the hands of people who flagg post based

0:28:19.040 --> 0:28:23.199
<v Speaker 1>on their opinions rather than any facts. The vast majority

0:28:23.240 --> 0:28:26.919
<v Speaker 1>of these fact checkers displayed extreme lefty bias, lying Zuckerberg's

0:28:26.920 --> 0:28:29.480
<v Speaker 1>platforms to diminish the reach of stories often based on

0:28:29.560 --> 0:28:33.520
<v Speaker 1>astenine or completely incorrect fact checks, including many many things

0:28:33.560 --> 0:28:36.160
<v Speaker 1>that turned out to be very true. They dropped Donald

0:28:36.160 --> 0:28:40.600
<v Speaker 1>Trump's engagement by forty five percent in twenty eighteen because

0:28:40.600 --> 0:28:42.480
<v Speaker 1>he was a Russian stooge.

0:28:43.160 --> 0:28:48.000
<v Speaker 2>Wozy there algorithms. Wow, that's unbelievable at that time sitting

0:28:48.040 --> 0:28:49.320
<v Speaker 2>president of the United States.

0:28:50.320 --> 0:28:53.640
<v Speaker 1>After January sixth was which was admittedly an awful day,

0:28:54.280 --> 0:28:59.280
<v Speaker 1>they banned President Trump completely, and their self righteous screen

0:28:59.400 --> 0:29:01.040
<v Speaker 1>on why they did it is a little long.

0:29:01.120 --> 0:29:02.120
<v Speaker 2>We don't have time.

0:29:04.480 --> 0:29:06.719
<v Speaker 1>We believe the public has the right to the broadest

0:29:06.720 --> 0:29:09.800
<v Speaker 1>possible access to political speech, even controversial speech. But we

0:29:10.000 --> 0:29:12.800
<v Speaker 1>believe the risks of allowing the president to continue to

0:29:12.880 --> 0:29:15.640
<v Speaker 1>use our service during this period are simply too great.

0:29:16.480 --> 0:29:19.040
<v Speaker 1>I believe in Trump until February twenty three.

0:29:19.240 --> 0:29:21.800
<v Speaker 2>That's it. I have statements like that. I believe in blue,

0:29:21.800 --> 0:29:23.360
<v Speaker 2>but we're going to do red. Okay.

0:29:24.760 --> 0:29:29.520
<v Speaker 1>They unpersoned regular people for misinformation. Shortly after banning Trump,

0:29:29.520 --> 0:29:32.600
<v Speaker 1>Facebook turns its focus on to his followers, regular Facebook users.

0:29:32.960 --> 0:29:37.040
<v Speaker 1>Zuckerberg's company vowed to ban anyone caught spreading content deemed misinformation,

0:29:37.200 --> 0:29:40.240
<v Speaker 1>despite the social media giant and its army of opinionated

0:29:40.280 --> 0:29:43.840
<v Speaker 1>leftist facts checkers struggling with the definition of that word.

0:29:44.840 --> 0:29:49.160
<v Speaker 1>And then they killed the reach of political content just

0:29:49.240 --> 0:29:51.680
<v Speaker 1>in the name of something or other because politics is

0:29:51.720 --> 0:29:54.720
<v Speaker 1>too scary or controversial or something, and so they just

0:29:54.920 --> 0:29:59.560
<v Speaker 1>quashed it in general, although again there was favoritism moving

0:29:59.560 --> 0:30:02.320
<v Speaker 1>along SWI. The good folks at the Free Beacon pointed

0:30:02.320 --> 0:30:06.640
<v Speaker 1>out that they were corrected several times by Zuckerberg's fact

0:30:06.680 --> 0:30:11.840
<v Speaker 1>checkers as checkers. In one case, the ex meta leader

0:30:12.120 --> 0:30:16.640
<v Speaker 1>FactCheck dot Org said, we falsely accused Joe Biden of

0:30:16.680 --> 0:30:20.360
<v Speaker 1>having issues with a teleprompter. That was the quote because

0:30:20.360 --> 0:30:24.080
<v Speaker 1>a White House press official said the octagenarians incoherent nonsense

0:30:24.160 --> 0:30:28.560
<v Speaker 1>was intentional, so the fact that he had issues with

0:30:28.600 --> 0:30:29.480
<v Speaker 1>the teleprompter was.

0:30:30.400 --> 0:30:33.800
<v Speaker 2>Labeled as untrue. That was probably one of those repeat

0:30:33.800 --> 0:30:35.680
<v Speaker 2>the lines or something like that.

0:30:37.120 --> 0:30:42.080
<v Speaker 1>In another case, Alan Duke, who was the head of

0:30:44.440 --> 0:30:47.200
<v Speaker 1>one of the fact checking organizations, a former CNN producer

0:30:47.160 --> 0:30:51.200
<v Speaker 1>who's donated thousands of dollars to Democrats exclusively called our

0:30:51.200 --> 0:30:54.720
<v Speaker 1>reporting on the Biden administration plans to fund crack pipes

0:30:55.040 --> 0:30:59.520
<v Speaker 1>partially false because the administration backpedaled after we published our piece.

0:31:01.960 --> 0:31:05.160
<v Speaker 1>At best, many of these fact checks offered an alternative opinion.

0:31:05.360 --> 0:31:08.240
<v Speaker 1>At worst, they facilitated the spread of disinformation my government

0:31:08.240 --> 0:31:11.160
<v Speaker 1>officials and aided their efforts to discredit and silence the

0:31:11.200 --> 0:31:14.480
<v Speaker 1>handful of news outlets actually interested in holding them accountable.

0:31:14.680 --> 0:31:17.240
<v Speaker 1>They will not be missed, and we hope they enjoy

0:31:17.360 --> 0:31:18.280
<v Speaker 1>learning to code.

0:31:19.080 --> 0:31:21.800
<v Speaker 2>So you said earlier you think Mark Zuckerberg might be

0:31:21.880 --> 0:31:24.920
<v Speaker 2>an actual free speech warrior. So you think that maybe

0:31:24.920 --> 0:31:27.520
<v Speaker 2>he just was just a business decision. The federal government

0:31:27.600 --> 0:31:29.640
<v Speaker 2>was making noises that they were going to make life

0:31:29.680 --> 0:31:32.680
<v Speaker 2>hard for him if he did this, So he did that.

0:31:33.680 --> 0:31:37.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and there is so little precedent on how modern

0:31:37.320 --> 0:31:41.720
<v Speaker 1>tech ought to be regulated. They're very, very sensitive to

0:31:42.640 --> 0:31:45.000
<v Speaker 1>the you know, a bunch of old senators and congressmen

0:31:45.040 --> 0:31:47.120
<v Speaker 1>waiting into it and doing the wrong thing and screwing

0:31:47.160 --> 0:31:50.120
<v Speaker 1>their business. So yeah, just as he's cow tewing to

0:31:50.160 --> 0:31:54.840
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump and nakedly seeking you know, friendly policy and

0:31:54.920 --> 0:31:58.160
<v Speaker 1>friendly ness from Donald Jay right now, he did the

0:31:58.200 --> 0:31:59.600
<v Speaker 1>same with the Biden administration.

0:32:00.360 --> 0:32:01.800
<v Speaker 2>It just wasn't publicized.

0:32:02.040 --> 0:32:04.920
<v Speaker 1>Every time somebody goes to have lunch with Trump, the

0:32:04.960 --> 0:32:07.040
<v Speaker 1>mainstream media acts like it's a big deal and that

0:32:07.040 --> 0:32:10.200
<v Speaker 1>they're licking his boots. These guys did the same thing

0:32:10.200 --> 0:32:12.680
<v Speaker 1>with the Biden administration. You just didn't hear about it.

0:32:13.040 --> 0:32:14.280
<v Speaker 2>Anyway. I wanted to get to this.

0:32:15.840 --> 0:32:18.920
<v Speaker 1>Seth Dylon and the geniuses at the Babylon b with

0:32:20.160 --> 0:32:22.680
<v Speaker 1>in honor of Facebook ending is fact checking partnerships. Here

0:32:22.680 --> 0:32:27.120
<v Speaker 1>are the funniest fact checks of Babylon b jokes. Number one,

0:32:28.360 --> 0:32:32.959
<v Speaker 1>the headline was CNN purchase purchases industrial sized washing machine

0:32:33.000 --> 0:32:37.640
<v Speaker 1>to spin news before publication, and it was actually fact

0:32:37.680 --> 0:32:40.880
<v Speaker 1>checked by Snopes and Facebook, who threatened us with suppression

0:32:40.920 --> 0:32:44.760
<v Speaker 1>and demonetization for sharing false information a classic.

0:32:45.440 --> 0:32:48.920
<v Speaker 2>You can't actually wash news, and there would not be

0:32:48.960 --> 0:32:50.520
<v Speaker 2>a washing machine big enough to do it.

0:32:50.960 --> 0:32:55.000
<v Speaker 1>A page you administer recently posted the link CNN purchases

0:32:55.040 --> 0:32:57.960
<v Speaker 1>industrial sized washing machines blah blah blah that contains info

0:32:58.040 --> 0:33:01.320
<v Speaker 1>disputed by Snopes dot com and independent facher. Repeat offenders

0:33:01.320 --> 0:33:04.000
<v Speaker 1>will see their distribution reduced and their ability to monetize

0:33:04.000 --> 0:33:10.000
<v Speaker 1>and advertise removed. While you outlawed satire, second fact check

0:33:10.080 --> 0:33:14.040
<v Speaker 1>by Facebook on the Babylon B the headline Acassio Cortes

0:33:14.040 --> 0:33:17.760
<v Speaker 1>appears on the price is Right guesses everything is free.

0:33:21.240 --> 0:33:22.400
<v Speaker 2>Oh my god.

0:33:23.040 --> 0:33:25.600
<v Speaker 1>Thank you to the brave fact checkers that Snopes for

0:33:25.680 --> 0:33:28.120
<v Speaker 1>calling us out on this one. Otherwise people might have

0:33:28.200 --> 0:33:35.880
<v Speaker 1>been fooled. The fact check was false. Number three Ninth

0:33:35.880 --> 0:33:40.600
<v Speaker 1>Circuit Court overturns death of Ruth Bader Ginsburg. That's a

0:33:40.640 --> 0:33:43.760
<v Speaker 1>great shot at the ninth USA Today, Another one of

0:33:44.000 --> 0:33:47.800
<v Speaker 1>Facebook's fact checking partners helpfully pointed out that this was satire,

0:33:48.400 --> 0:33:51.240
<v Speaker 1>fact checking the satirical claim that the Ninth Circuit Court

0:33:51.240 --> 0:33:54.840
<v Speaker 1>of Appeals overturned Ginsburg's death. Wait a second, now, on

0:33:54.880 --> 0:33:57.160
<v Speaker 1>the AOC one, you could at least make the argument

0:33:57.240 --> 0:34:01.760
<v Speaker 1>that some really dumb people might believe. That is somebody

0:34:01.760 --> 0:34:03.600
<v Speaker 1>gonna believe a court overturned to death.

0:34:04.840 --> 0:34:05.200
<v Speaker 2>I know.

0:34:05.880 --> 0:34:09.879
<v Speaker 1>It's it's almost as if the thea the parody the

0:34:09.960 --> 0:34:12.680
<v Speaker 1>fact check is itself a parody or the fact check

0:34:12.680 --> 0:34:16.799
<v Speaker 1>ID we're through the looking glass airpeople. Let's see, here's

0:34:16.800 --> 0:34:21.120
<v Speaker 1>another headline that was helpfully fact checked with moonwater announcement.

0:34:21.200 --> 0:34:23.520
<v Speaker 1>Remember when they discovered there's probably ice on the moon water,

0:34:23.560 --> 0:34:28.800
<v Speaker 1>therefore water With moonwater announcement, Trump proposes space Navy. Another

0:34:28.920 --> 0:34:32.440
<v Speaker 1>fact check from USA Today. Guys, you can also tell

0:34:32.480 --> 0:34:35.080
<v Speaker 1>it satire because if you look really closely, you'll see

0:34:35.080 --> 0:34:37.680
<v Speaker 1>there's a picture of an aircraft carrier on the moon,

0:34:39.200 --> 0:34:43.919
<v Speaker 1>and there is in this story, uh, the fact check

0:34:43.960 --> 0:34:45.759
<v Speaker 1>a headline on the babel of me Trump, I have

0:34:45.840 --> 0:34:49.440
<v Speaker 1>done more for Christianity than Jesus. In our defense, we

0:34:49.480 --> 0:34:52.200
<v Speaker 1>wrote this before he actually said something uncomfortably close to

0:34:52.760 --> 0:34:53.200
<v Speaker 1>gonna say.

0:34:53.280 --> 0:34:55.360
<v Speaker 2>If I saw that, I wouldn't jump to the conclusion

0:34:55.400 --> 0:34:56.240
<v Speaker 2>that that was satire.

0:34:57.160 --> 0:35:00.120
<v Speaker 1>Other example, Pope Francis says COVID vaccine will now we

0:35:00.200 --> 0:35:01.360
<v Speaker 1>required to answer heaven.

0:35:01.680 --> 0:35:03.400
<v Speaker 2>They were fact checked by Reuters.

0:35:06.680 --> 0:35:11.120
<v Speaker 1>Oh and finally, California considering tax on breathing. Snopes found

0:35:11.160 --> 0:35:13.600
<v Speaker 1>this false, but we're pretty sure it's true.

0:35:14.400 --> 0:35:17.840
<v Speaker 2>Wow, that's a good one. AOC guesses everything's free. That's hilarious.

0:35:17.920 --> 0:35:20.320
<v Speaker 2>If you miss an hour, get the podcast Armstrong and

0:35:20.400 --> 0:35:21.440
<v Speaker 2>Getty on demand.

0:35:21.960 --> 0:35:24.880
<v Speaker 4>Subscribe Armstrong and Getty