WEBVTT - Miami, Taking Wall Street From NYC Won't Be Easy

0:00:00.120 --> 0:00:02.400
<v Speaker 1>Hey, it's Carol and Tim and we have something new

0:00:02.440 --> 0:00:03.280
<v Speaker 1>and exciting for you.

0:00:03.560 --> 0:00:06.360
<v Speaker 2>Everything you love about Bloomberg Radio is now in your car.

0:00:06.519 --> 0:00:09.640
<v Speaker 1>The new Bloomberg Business App now featuring Apple CarPlay and

0:00:09.640 --> 0:00:10.320
<v Speaker 1>Android Auto.

0:00:10.440 --> 0:00:13.960
<v Speaker 2>Listen to your favorite Bloomberg Radio stations anytime.

0:00:13.480 --> 0:00:16.960
<v Speaker 1>Plus every Bloomberg podcast, the latest news, and more, all

0:00:17.079 --> 0:00:18.120
<v Speaker 1>at the click of a button.

0:00:18.280 --> 0:00:21.240
<v Speaker 2>It's free and simple to use. Just download the Bloomberg

0:00:21.239 --> 0:00:23.680
<v Speaker 2>Business App on your smartphone and connect your phone to

0:00:23.720 --> 0:00:24.200
<v Speaker 2>your car.

0:00:24.400 --> 0:00:27.360
<v Speaker 1>The Bloomberg Business App now with Apple CarPlay and Android

0:00:27.360 --> 0:00:30.200
<v Speaker 1>Auto features. Download it free in the Apple App Store

0:00:30.320 --> 0:00:31.400
<v Speaker 1>or on Google Play.

0:00:31.480 --> 0:00:34.600
<v Speaker 2>Presented by our sponsor, Interactive Brokers.

0:00:35.680 --> 0:00:40.040
<v Speaker 3>This is Bloomberg Business Week inside from the reporters and

0:00:40.200 --> 0:00:43.800
<v Speaker 3>editors who bring you America's most trusted business magazine, plus

0:00:43.840 --> 0:00:47.760
<v Speaker 3>gloom O Business finance and tech news. The Bloomberg Business

0:00:47.760 --> 0:00:52.960
<v Speaker 3>Week Podcast with Carol Messer and Tim Stenebeck from Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:54.800 --> 0:00:57.360
<v Speaker 4>Fascinating one.

0:00:57.480 --> 0:00:59.520
<v Speaker 3>If you sit at waked, I'm.

0:00:59.280 --> 0:01:00.800
<v Speaker 5>Going when to Miami.

0:01:01.560 --> 0:01:06.960
<v Speaker 3>Welcome to my body, and I don't if he stood

0:01:06.959 --> 0:01:10.480
<v Speaker 3>a break it down, Welcome to.

0:01:11.319 --> 0:01:12.200
<v Speaker 4>Me to Miami.

0:01:12.360 --> 0:01:16.720
<v Speaker 6>That is uh, what Ken Griffin is like is likely

0:01:16.760 --> 0:01:19.080
<v Speaker 6>to say to everyone out there. Ken Griffin, of course,

0:01:19.120 --> 0:01:21.800
<v Speaker 6>a hedge fund billionaire. He was speaking with Arshenali Bask

0:01:21.840 --> 0:01:25.040
<v Speaker 6>at the Citadel Securities Global Macro Conference in Miami.

0:01:25.080 --> 0:01:26.680
<v Speaker 4>Take a listen to what he said.

0:01:28.000 --> 0:01:32.800
<v Speaker 7>New York is the financial capital of America today and

0:01:32.840 --> 0:01:36.720
<v Speaker 7>it's New York's to lose. Having said that, Miami I

0:01:36.720 --> 0:01:38.440
<v Speaker 7>think represents the future of America.

0:01:40.360 --> 0:01:43.160
<v Speaker 6>So he's referring to Wall Street, South Bailey, the idea

0:01:43.200 --> 0:01:46.440
<v Speaker 6>that South Florida's the up and coming financial center. Uh,

0:01:46.720 --> 0:01:49.360
<v Speaker 6>they've been promoting this idea for years. It's definitely gained

0:01:49.360 --> 0:01:51.200
<v Speaker 6>some traction since the pandemic.

0:01:51.360 --> 0:01:54.120
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, we saw a lot of people wanting more tax

0:01:54.200 --> 0:01:57.200
<v Speaker 5>friendly states. Obviously, it's easy to talk your book when

0:01:57.240 --> 0:01:59.520
<v Speaker 5>you're someone who's made the move down there. So it

0:01:59.560 --> 0:02:01.920
<v Speaker 5>does out and interesting that he said it's where the

0:02:01.960 --> 0:02:04.280
<v Speaker 5>future is and they're trying to court more and more.

0:02:04.280 --> 0:02:06.160
<v Speaker 5>I know a number of traders that did move down

0:02:06.440 --> 0:02:09.360
<v Speaker 5>and so far I haven't complained, but I tell them often.

0:02:09.520 --> 0:02:10.640
<v Speaker 8>Let's talk more in August.

0:02:10.800 --> 0:02:12.960
<v Speaker 6>All right, Well, let's bring in Jonathan Levin. He is

0:02:13.080 --> 0:02:16.000
<v Speaker 6>a market's columnist for Bloomberg Opinion. He is based in

0:02:16.000 --> 0:02:19.480
<v Speaker 6>Miami and Jonathan you've lived in Miami for a while,

0:02:19.520 --> 0:02:21.600
<v Speaker 6>have you talked to the finance guys who've made their

0:02:21.639 --> 0:02:22.200
<v Speaker 6>way down.

0:02:22.240 --> 0:02:23.000
<v Speaker 4>What are they saying?

0:02:24.720 --> 0:02:24.960
<v Speaker 9>Yeah?

0:02:24.960 --> 0:02:28.919
<v Speaker 10>Absolutely? I mean, look, first, starters, if you're coming from

0:02:29.000 --> 0:02:32.760
<v Speaker 10>New York City, you get here and you immediately say, hey,

0:02:32.800 --> 0:02:34.360
<v Speaker 10>this is a pretty good deal.

0:02:34.600 --> 0:02:34.760
<v Speaker 5>Right.

0:02:34.840 --> 0:02:37.560
<v Speaker 10>I don't have to deal with Northeast winters for starters,

0:02:39.360 --> 0:02:42.760
<v Speaker 10>I'm not paying a state income tax. And while Miami

0:02:42.840 --> 0:02:46.560
<v Speaker 10>has gotten to be a pretty pricey place, especially recently,

0:02:47.400 --> 0:02:49.960
<v Speaker 10>it's still less expensive, let's face it, than you know,

0:02:50.080 --> 0:02:53.320
<v Speaker 10>trying to live in Manhattan or even San Francisco. Right,

0:02:53.400 --> 0:02:57.000
<v Speaker 10>So you get here and you get this sense of

0:02:57.120 --> 0:03:01.840
<v Speaker 10>like euphoria for the first of months, maybe even the

0:03:01.840 --> 0:03:03.560
<v Speaker 10>first few years that people get here.

0:03:04.560 --> 0:03:06.720
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, and I'm more interested in kind of what those

0:03:06.720 --> 0:03:09.440
<v Speaker 5>steps look like though, for it to look more like

0:03:09.680 --> 0:03:12.560
<v Speaker 5>in New York and actually be this future hub that

0:03:12.680 --> 0:03:15.000
<v Speaker 5>Ken Griffin and many others enjoy talking about.

0:03:16.400 --> 0:03:16.720
<v Speaker 11>Sure.

0:03:16.760 --> 0:03:22.359
<v Speaker 10>Absolutely. So put in my column today is that, you know,

0:03:22.520 --> 0:03:25.040
<v Speaker 10>Miami really needs to develop into a more mature place

0:03:25.160 --> 0:03:28.560
<v Speaker 10>if it is going to really compete with these major

0:03:28.600 --> 0:03:33.160
<v Speaker 10>financial centers. Right, So, for starters, we are a car town.

0:03:34.520 --> 0:03:37.760
<v Speaker 10>You can't get anywhere without a car. In South Florida,

0:03:37.840 --> 0:03:41.920
<v Speaker 10>we do not really have a viable public transit system.

0:03:42.400 --> 0:03:46.160
<v Speaker 10>It's nothing like New York in that regard. Right, So,

0:03:46.560 --> 0:03:50.320
<v Speaker 10>you know, forty years ago they put up this metro rail.

0:03:51.560 --> 0:03:54.800
<v Speaker 10>It basically only works for like three or four percent

0:03:54.840 --> 0:03:59.440
<v Speaker 10>of the population. It's just not a very comprehensive public

0:03:59.480 --> 0:04:02.520
<v Speaker 10>transit system. And so, you know, one of my big

0:04:04.240 --> 0:04:08.119
<v Speaker 10>recommendations in my column today is if you really want

0:04:08.160 --> 0:04:11.400
<v Speaker 10>to compete and have a future as Wall Streets South,

0:04:11.640 --> 0:04:13.760
<v Speaker 10>you have to do something about that. You have to

0:04:13.800 --> 0:04:17.040
<v Speaker 10>do something about this traffic that is just getting worse

0:04:17.279 --> 0:04:21.360
<v Speaker 10>and worse. And you know, it's a huge undertaking to say,

0:04:22.240 --> 0:04:24.359
<v Speaker 10>you know, let's go out there and build this massive

0:04:24.400 --> 0:04:26.800
<v Speaker 10>new rail system. I don't think that that's practical. I

0:04:26.800 --> 0:04:30.040
<v Speaker 10>don't think that that's going to happen. But as development

0:04:30.279 --> 0:04:32.960
<v Speaker 10>officials look at the future, they have to be looking

0:04:33.000 --> 0:04:36.880
<v Speaker 10>at creating more walkable neighborhoods going forward, and maybe even

0:04:37.080 --> 0:04:39.880
<v Speaker 10>you know, doing something with Miami's water you know, where

0:04:39.880 --> 0:04:42.839
<v Speaker 10>are the furry is, where are the water taxis? Anything

0:04:43.080 --> 0:04:44.880
<v Speaker 10>to get people out of those cars.

0:04:45.240 --> 0:04:47.120
<v Speaker 6>I love that idea, and that would make it really

0:04:47.120 --> 0:04:52.120
<v Speaker 6>picturesque and just give it a new character. Speaking of water, Jonathan,

0:04:52.240 --> 0:04:55.159
<v Speaker 6>the area is highly prone to flooding, and of course

0:04:55.200 --> 0:04:58.000
<v Speaker 6>it's in a hurricane zone as well. So climate resiliency

0:04:58.440 --> 0:05:01.280
<v Speaker 6>is obviously a really big issue. You from what you've

0:05:01.320 --> 0:05:05.119
<v Speaker 6>seen as South Florida's local governments doing enough what words

0:05:05.120 --> 0:05:05.960
<v Speaker 6>should they be doing?

0:05:07.440 --> 0:05:10.800
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, it's huge. I mean, if you talk about really

0:05:10.839 --> 0:05:15.400
<v Speaker 10>bringing in serious, serious businesses like another Citadel, you have

0:05:15.440 --> 0:05:17.960
<v Speaker 10>to give them the confidence that you know, if they're

0:05:18.000 --> 0:05:21.120
<v Speaker 10>investing for the future, their their investments are going to

0:05:21.160 --> 0:05:25.200
<v Speaker 10>pay off over decades and nobody wants to think about

0:05:25.200 --> 0:05:28.560
<v Speaker 10>the possibility that the lobby of their beautiful new building

0:05:28.640 --> 0:05:30.680
<v Speaker 10>is going to be flooding on a regular basis.

0:05:30.800 --> 0:05:30.960
<v Speaker 12>Right.

0:05:31.600 --> 0:05:35.800
<v Speaker 10>So, I've seen some of these governments making the right overtures.

0:05:35.920 --> 0:05:41.160
<v Speaker 10>You know, City of Miami did a big climate resiliency

0:05:41.800 --> 0:05:46.120
<v Speaker 10>bond some time ago. They're making sort of investments and

0:05:46.720 --> 0:05:49.800
<v Speaker 10>pumps and these sorts of things. The point I make

0:05:50.000 --> 0:05:52.360
<v Speaker 10>is you've just got to do more and more of it.

0:05:52.680 --> 0:05:56.200
<v Speaker 10>Investing for the long term is really about elevate, elevate,

0:05:56.360 --> 0:06:00.360
<v Speaker 10>elevate with that infrastructure, and on the private side also

0:06:00.440 --> 0:06:03.159
<v Speaker 10>got to be out there and putting in the most

0:06:03.400 --> 0:06:08.479
<v Speaker 10>rigorous codes possible, so that private businesses and private homes

0:06:08.720 --> 0:06:13.039
<v Speaker 10>are essentially turning themselves into bunkers for the future climate

0:06:13.120 --> 0:06:16.440
<v Speaker 10>challenges that sort of inevitably this region is going to face.

0:06:17.120 --> 0:06:19.080
<v Speaker 5>And one of the things I'm reminded of a story

0:06:19.080 --> 0:06:22.400
<v Speaker 5>back in September about the cost to ensure homes is

0:06:22.440 --> 0:06:25.400
<v Speaker 5>that something Jonathan that comes up and is being considered

0:06:25.440 --> 0:06:28.160
<v Speaker 5>just given the cost of living can be cheaper in

0:06:28.160 --> 0:06:31.920
<v Speaker 5>some regards, but if you're spending much higher premium to

0:06:32.000 --> 0:06:34.719
<v Speaker 5>ensure your house or your car, does that balance out?

0:06:36.320 --> 0:06:39.719
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, I think that's absolutely a huge, a huge point.

0:06:39.880 --> 0:06:43.200
<v Speaker 10>I mean, look, the past few years have been especially

0:06:43.279 --> 0:06:49.360
<v Speaker 10>especially bad for the property insurance segment here in South Florida,

0:06:49.400 --> 0:06:51.960
<v Speaker 10>and I think it's a confluence of factors. It is

0:06:52.080 --> 0:06:58.000
<v Speaker 10>absolutely partially about the climate challenges that this region is facing.

0:06:58.120 --> 0:07:01.880
<v Speaker 10>On top of that, we have a runaway litigation issue

0:07:01.520 --> 0:07:05.080
<v Speaker 10>in the state of Florida. There have been some reforms

0:07:05.120 --> 0:07:08.599
<v Speaker 10>that have tried to tackle that, and you know, let's

0:07:08.600 --> 0:07:13.200
<v Speaker 10>face it, I think that the dynamics in fixed income

0:07:13.320 --> 0:07:19.680
<v Speaker 10>markets have also played into the price the price hikes

0:07:19.800 --> 0:07:24.960
<v Speaker 10>that we've seen trickle down to property insurance rates. So

0:07:25.000 --> 0:07:28.920
<v Speaker 10>The bottom line is property insurance inflation has been through

0:07:28.960 --> 0:07:31.920
<v Speaker 10>the roof here in the state of Florida, and it

0:07:32.040 --> 0:07:35.800
<v Speaker 10>absolutely it makes it harder both for those Wall Street

0:07:35.840 --> 0:07:40.960
<v Speaker 10>South migrants, but it makes it harder to for workers

0:07:41.000 --> 0:07:45.120
<v Speaker 10>who are sort of Wall Street South adjacent. Right, So

0:07:45.600 --> 0:07:47.920
<v Speaker 10>if I if I could just pivot to sort of

0:07:47.960 --> 0:07:51.960
<v Speaker 10>what the third pillar of where Florida needs to see

0:07:52.400 --> 0:07:57.240
<v Speaker 10>improvement to keep its momentum going, it's really education and

0:07:57.360 --> 0:08:01.320
<v Speaker 10>that all comes down to drawing the best teachers to

0:08:01.400 --> 0:08:05.080
<v Speaker 10>the region. Whether it's for private schools or public schools.

0:08:05.320 --> 0:08:07.400
<v Speaker 10>You need to bring in more and more teachers. We

0:08:07.600 --> 0:08:11.880
<v Speaker 10>don't have great student teacher ratios here and you're not

0:08:12.000 --> 0:08:15.320
<v Speaker 10>going to bring in more great teachers if people can't

0:08:15.320 --> 0:08:19.320
<v Speaker 10>afford to live here because there is both housing inflation

0:08:19.760 --> 0:08:23.520
<v Speaker 10>and insurance inflation. And by the way, as I started with,

0:08:24.000 --> 0:08:27.480
<v Speaker 10>not great public transit options for those people who choose

0:08:27.520 --> 0:08:30.400
<v Speaker 10>to live out in those suburbs and excerbs, so very

0:08:30.440 --> 0:08:34.839
<v Speaker 10>difficult cocktail of factors here.

0:08:35.080 --> 0:08:35.680
<v Speaker 4>Absolutely.

0:08:35.679 --> 0:08:37.200
<v Speaker 6>I mean, if you want to keep the talent, you

0:08:37.280 --> 0:08:39.960
<v Speaker 6>have to make it easy for the talent to bring

0:08:40.000 --> 0:08:43.160
<v Speaker 6>over their entire families to uproot them from the Northeast,

0:08:43.200 --> 0:08:46.520
<v Speaker 6>where there's no shortage of high priced private schools that

0:08:47.360 --> 0:08:49.280
<v Speaker 6>have a short list of getting into the Harvards and

0:08:49.320 --> 0:08:52.640
<v Speaker 6>the Yales. You had something really interesting in your column

0:08:52.640 --> 0:08:56.840
<v Speaker 6>that looked at the private schools and how many of

0:08:56.880 --> 0:09:00.959
<v Speaker 6>them have good SAT scores in the Miami area versus

0:09:01.000 --> 0:09:03.560
<v Speaker 6>New York, and the contrast is stunning.

0:09:05.120 --> 0:09:08.800
<v Speaker 10>Yeah. Absolutely, I mean I think the story is, you know,

0:09:09.120 --> 0:09:12.640
<v Speaker 10>I live down here. I try to defend the area,

0:09:12.760 --> 0:09:15.319
<v Speaker 10>and I think there are a lot of very good

0:09:15.920 --> 0:09:19.520
<v Speaker 10>private and public schools down here. But the truth of

0:09:19.559 --> 0:09:23.400
<v Speaker 10>the matter is there aren't a ton of great schools.

0:09:23.840 --> 0:09:27.960
<v Speaker 10>And the way you know, we measured great high schools

0:09:27.960 --> 0:09:31.880
<v Speaker 10>with the help of this consulting firm, Webster Pacific, is like,

0:09:31.920 --> 0:09:36.439
<v Speaker 10>how many of them produce average SAT scores above fourteen hundred.

0:09:36.720 --> 0:09:40.719
<v Speaker 10>The answer very quickly is two. Right, So you can

0:09:40.760 --> 0:09:44.280
<v Speaker 10>imagine if you have a big flood of folks coming

0:09:44.320 --> 0:09:47.600
<v Speaker 10>in and they're managing directors, they're top folks at hedge funds,

0:09:47.840 --> 0:09:51.280
<v Speaker 10>they all want to get their kids into these two schools.

0:09:51.640 --> 0:09:54.840
<v Speaker 10>And those two schools, you know, Pine Crest and Ransom

0:09:54.840 --> 0:09:57.800
<v Speaker 10>Efvert Blades, for what it's worth, they can only expand,

0:09:57.960 --> 0:10:01.320
<v Speaker 10>so fast. You know, you understand where they're coming from.

0:10:01.320 --> 0:10:05.720
<v Speaker 10>They don't want to expand so fast that they risk

0:10:05.800 --> 0:10:11.640
<v Speaker 10>their reputation, that they risk the quality of the education.

0:10:12.120 --> 0:10:16.920
<v Speaker 10>And also expanding means acquiring more real estate. We've talked

0:10:16.960 --> 0:10:20.959
<v Speaker 10>about why and how that's difficult in a place like this,

0:10:21.280 --> 0:10:25.040
<v Speaker 10>so again, just you know, very challenging. If you're up

0:10:25.080 --> 0:10:29.360
<v Speaker 10>in Manhattan, you feel like you have dozens of options,

0:10:29.679 --> 0:10:32.240
<v Speaker 10>or at least a couple dozen of very very elite

0:10:32.360 --> 0:10:36.880
<v Speaker 10>private schools. Here, the options are few and far between,

0:10:37.160 --> 0:10:40.840
<v Speaker 10>and by the way, one of them is probably as

0:10:40.920 --> 0:10:43.880
<v Speaker 10>much as an hour or more from downtown Miami. So

0:10:44.400 --> 0:10:46.760
<v Speaker 10>you know, good luck with that commune exactly.

0:10:47.120 --> 0:10:49.600
<v Speaker 6>Jonathan Llvin, thank you so much for joining us. Johnathan

0:10:49.640 --> 0:10:52.960
<v Speaker 6>Ullivan is a Bloomberg opinion columnist joining us from Miami

0:10:53.360 --> 0:10:55.679
<v Speaker 6>and Baillie. We were talking earlier about how we may

0:10:55.679 --> 0:10:58.640
<v Speaker 6>not necessarily be Florida fans, but these are issues that

0:10:58.880 --> 0:11:02.679
<v Speaker 6>folks of the finance industry think about constantly. Education, transportation,

0:11:02.760 --> 0:11:04.280
<v Speaker 6>and ease of transit especially.

0:11:04.400 --> 0:11:06.360
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I'm not an IVY League grad, but I do

0:11:06.520 --> 0:11:09.480
<v Speaker 5>know that IVY League grads prefer to get their kids

0:11:09.520 --> 0:11:12.200
<v Speaker 5>set up to go to an IVY League, and as

0:11:12.360 --> 0:11:15.960
<v Speaker 5>Jonathan mentioned, that's one of those key factors for drawing

0:11:16.000 --> 0:11:17.120
<v Speaker 5>the true elites down there.

0:11:17.160 --> 0:11:19.960
<v Speaker 6>All right, Well, South Florida still has its boosters, and

0:11:20.000 --> 0:11:22.240
<v Speaker 6>of course there is plenty of money moving down there,

0:11:22.320 --> 0:11:25.440
<v Speaker 6>just it continues to be a challenge for those who

0:11:25.520 --> 0:11:26.920
<v Speaker 6>are considering making the move.

0:11:30.360 --> 0:11:33.920
<v Speaker 3>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week podcast. Catch us

0:11:33.960 --> 0:11:37.320
<v Speaker 3>live weekday afternoons from three to six Eastern Listen on

0:11:37.360 --> 0:11:41.400
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg dot com, the iHeartRadio app, and the Bloomberg Business App,

0:11:41.679 --> 0:11:43.400
<v Speaker 3>or watch us live on YouTube.

0:11:44.760 --> 0:11:46.880
<v Speaker 4>Dally, did you know that we had APEC this week?

0:11:47.280 --> 0:11:49.720
<v Speaker 5>I think I heard that I did see Janet Yellen

0:11:49.800 --> 0:11:51.720
<v Speaker 5>at an in and out according to Twitter.

0:11:51.800 --> 0:11:53.760
<v Speaker 8>I'm or X. I guess I'm really interested what her

0:11:53.840 --> 0:11:54.240
<v Speaker 8>order was?

0:11:54.559 --> 0:11:56.239
<v Speaker 4>Someone posted this on x Someone.

0:11:56.000 --> 0:11:58.600
<v Speaker 8>Posted a photo of Janet Yellen ordering in and out.

0:11:58.720 --> 0:12:01.320
<v Speaker 6>Actually, that's really good. I gotta go find that one.

0:12:02.040 --> 0:12:03.800
<v Speaker 6>We want to bring in someone who knows quite a

0:12:03.840 --> 0:12:07.200
<v Speaker 6>bit about APEC, and of course is a longtime China watcher.

0:12:07.280 --> 0:12:10.600
<v Speaker 6>He is Andy Brown, a partner at Brunswick Group. He

0:12:10.600 --> 0:12:13.240
<v Speaker 6>heads up Brunswick's China Hub, which means he works closely

0:12:13.280 --> 0:12:16.880
<v Speaker 6>with his colleagues in China and globally to lead up

0:12:16.880 --> 0:12:20.320
<v Speaker 6>the firm's geopolitical practice to advise clients on China related issues.

0:12:20.600 --> 0:12:21.640
<v Speaker 4>And he's going to help us.

0:12:21.559 --> 0:12:24.920
<v Speaker 6>Recap what happened at APEC because Andy, you had the

0:12:25.000 --> 0:12:29.920
<v Speaker 6>long anticipated, high stakes summit meeting between President Biden and

0:12:29.960 --> 0:12:33.240
<v Speaker 6>President Chijinping, and it did yield some big wins. Right,

0:12:33.280 --> 0:12:36.679
<v Speaker 6>there's going to be military to military communications, there's going

0:12:36.720 --> 0:12:39.840
<v Speaker 6>to be pandas right exactly.

0:12:39.320 --> 0:12:43.720
<v Speaker 13>Some people have called APEX a meeting that occurred on

0:12:43.800 --> 0:12:48.680
<v Speaker 13>the sidelines of the summit, and I think there's quite

0:12:48.679 --> 0:12:51.120
<v Speaker 13>a bit of truth to that. Yeah, Look, it was

0:12:51.160 --> 0:12:56.240
<v Speaker 13>a successful meeting as far as I can tell. It

0:12:56.400 --> 0:12:59.840
<v Speaker 13>was successful because it happened.

0:13:01.240 --> 0:13:02.840
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, and they agreed to talk.

0:13:03.160 --> 0:13:05.719
<v Speaker 13>They agreed to talk. It was successful against a very

0:13:05.840 --> 0:13:11.319
<v Speaker 13>low base of expectation. It was successful because nothing terrible happened,

0:13:11.760 --> 0:13:15.679
<v Speaker 13>if you don't count Joe Biden yet again calling Si

0:13:15.800 --> 0:13:22.160
<v Speaker 13>Jinping a dictator, yeah, and Anthony blinking looking terribly pained

0:13:22.240 --> 0:13:26.559
<v Speaker 13>at the reference. But look, I think it was successful

0:13:26.640 --> 0:13:31.400
<v Speaker 13>because it just seems so normal. You know, you had

0:13:31.400 --> 0:13:35.120
<v Speaker 13>two leaders and they sat down and they across a table,

0:13:35.160 --> 0:13:37.280
<v Speaker 13>and they were flanked by their aids, and they had

0:13:37.280 --> 0:13:40.199
<v Speaker 13>a substantial conversation and a nice walk in the garden,

0:13:40.360 --> 0:13:46.480
<v Speaker 13>and Si Jinping met a bunch of CEOs and as normal,

0:13:46.640 --> 0:13:49.200
<v Speaker 13>they sort of sucked up to him and getting a

0:13:49.280 --> 0:13:54.160
<v Speaker 13>round of a standing ovation and Sijmpin cracked a smile,

0:13:54.720 --> 0:13:59.160
<v Speaker 13>actually a big grin when Gavin Newsom handed him a

0:13:59.240 --> 0:14:04.320
<v Speaker 13>Golden State Warriors. Well, that's no, that's not normal. That's

0:14:04.320 --> 0:14:07.960
<v Speaker 13>that's not normal. That's beyond that's beyond normal. And and look,

0:14:07.960 --> 0:14:09.839
<v Speaker 13>you know you've got to you've got to measure that

0:14:10.040 --> 0:14:13.200
<v Speaker 13>against the beginning of this year, when and when it

0:14:13.240 --> 0:14:17.240
<v Speaker 13>was anything but normal, when it was extremely abnormal.

0:14:17.760 --> 0:14:17.880
<v Speaker 5>Uh.

0:14:18.000 --> 0:14:21.120
<v Speaker 13>And in fact, earlier this year people were talking about war.

0:14:22.240 --> 0:14:23.840
<v Speaker 5>Well, we see we have two wars going on and

0:14:23.920 --> 0:14:26.720
<v Speaker 5>the uncertainty around that. But I'm wondering what the messaging

0:14:26.920 --> 0:14:29.960
<v Speaker 5>from this summit could mean for investors wanting to get

0:14:30.000 --> 0:14:32.400
<v Speaker 5>back into China, because we saw Ali Baba pulling back

0:14:32.440 --> 0:14:35.680
<v Speaker 5>their plan to separate their cloud unit because of the

0:14:35.800 --> 0:14:39.640
<v Speaker 5>restrictions from the US shipping AI or chips to China.

0:14:40.480 --> 0:14:43.080
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, I don't actually think that that that was the

0:14:43.160 --> 0:14:46.560
<v Speaker 13>point of the meeting was to get anything substantial. Frankly,

0:14:46.640 --> 0:14:49.600
<v Speaker 13>on anything. The point of this meeting was just to

0:14:49.640 --> 0:14:54.440
<v Speaker 13>get these two sides together again, and there has been

0:14:54.520 --> 0:14:59.360
<v Speaker 13>a dangerous absence of dialogue even as military tensions build,

0:15:00.000 --> 0:15:03.280
<v Speaker 13>even as you have war in Ukraine, you have war

0:15:03.360 --> 0:15:07.480
<v Speaker 13>in Gaza, and you have all kinds of tripwise flash

0:15:07.520 --> 0:15:13.200
<v Speaker 13>points around Asia, Chinese Filipino ships standing off in the

0:15:13.280 --> 0:15:17.840
<v Speaker 13>South China Sea. It's important that these two leaders get together.

0:15:18.840 --> 0:15:21.920
<v Speaker 13>And frankly, I thought one of the more important agreements

0:15:22.280 --> 0:15:24.960
<v Speaker 13>we had an agreement for military military to resume military

0:15:25.000 --> 0:15:28.080
<v Speaker 13>military exchanges. We had an agreement on fentanyl. I thought

0:15:28.120 --> 0:15:30.560
<v Speaker 13>maybe one of the most important was agreement to get

0:15:30.600 --> 0:15:34.240
<v Speaker 13>more flights going before between the United States and China.

0:15:34.320 --> 0:15:37.000
<v Speaker 13>You've got to remember, in all the sort of myriad

0:15:37.040 --> 0:15:40.720
<v Speaker 13>ways that Chinese and Americans have met over the years,

0:15:40.760 --> 0:15:44.560
<v Speaker 13>whether that's in conference rooms or in sports stadiums or

0:15:44.560 --> 0:15:48.720
<v Speaker 13>hotels or airplanes, all of that, all of that has

0:15:48.760 --> 0:15:54.080
<v Speaker 13>been frozen and in a world that is becoming incredibly tense.

0:15:54.720 --> 0:15:56.840
<v Speaker 6>So things really took a turn for the worse when

0:15:57.160 --> 0:15:59.920
<v Speaker 6>former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi made a trip to Thai

0:16:00.120 --> 0:16:04.040
<v Speaker 6>One basically sticking a finger in Beijing's eye. Have all

0:16:04.080 --> 0:16:06.800
<v Speaker 6>the different measures that have been piled on been rolled

0:16:06.840 --> 0:16:07.920
<v Speaker 6>back following.

0:16:07.600 --> 0:16:11.360
<v Speaker 13>That, no well talking so so, first of all, in

0:16:11.400 --> 0:16:13.840
<v Speaker 13>the aftermath of that was the August August visit, and

0:16:13.840 --> 0:16:17.800
<v Speaker 13>then you had China firing ballistic missiles over Taiwans halted

0:16:18.280 --> 0:16:23.200
<v Speaker 13>all negotiations, all talks about about anything. We haven't wound back.

0:16:23.840 --> 0:16:26.440
<v Speaker 13>I mean, we're not going back to where we were before.

0:16:27.360 --> 0:16:33.280
<v Speaker 13>The US position is, basically, this is a fundamentally competitive relationship,

0:16:34.320 --> 0:16:36.560
<v Speaker 13>but we've got to make it work, frenemies. We got

0:16:36.560 --> 0:16:39.080
<v Speaker 13>to make it work because we've got a big trade relationship,

0:16:39.120 --> 0:16:42.240
<v Speaker 13>investment relationship, and we've got a lot of people to

0:16:42.320 --> 0:16:46.080
<v Speaker 13>people contact, and we have a lot of problems in

0:16:46.120 --> 0:16:51.400
<v Speaker 13>the world that needs solving, not least climate change, pandemics, narcotics,

0:16:51.440 --> 0:16:55.400
<v Speaker 13>trafficking and so on. That's the That's the US position,

0:16:55.480 --> 0:16:57.440
<v Speaker 13>and it seems to me to be a pretty sensible

0:16:57.480 --> 0:17:00.640
<v Speaker 13>one that acknowledges the tensions and the relationship, that says

0:17:00.680 --> 0:17:02.479
<v Speaker 13>we've got to manage them somehow.

0:17:02.880 --> 0:17:06.440
<v Speaker 5>We're talking Andy Brown, partner at Brunswick Group, former editorial

0:17:06.480 --> 0:17:09.800
<v Speaker 5>director of the Bloomberg New Economic Forum.

0:17:09.920 --> 0:17:12.000
<v Speaker 8>So glad to have you back in studio.

0:17:12.040 --> 0:17:13.920
<v Speaker 5>But Andy, one thing that's come up on a couple

0:17:13.960 --> 0:17:17.560
<v Speaker 5>of conversations I've had, is that they view some investors

0:17:17.720 --> 0:17:23.080
<v Speaker 5>view the current geopolitical landscape as the most uncertain since

0:17:23.119 --> 0:17:25.520
<v Speaker 5>the aftermath of two thousand and one, eris aftermath of

0:17:25.600 --> 0:17:28.800
<v Speaker 5>nine to eleven, Given everything going on in Gaza, in Ukraine,

0:17:28.880 --> 0:17:32.320
<v Speaker 5>uncertainty around China and Taiwan. What do you make of

0:17:32.359 --> 0:17:36.680
<v Speaker 5>that potential argument? And did this summit have any impact

0:17:36.720 --> 0:17:37.400
<v Speaker 5>on your view?

0:17:38.119 --> 0:17:42.320
<v Speaker 13>Well, to the extent that geopolitics drives business today, and

0:17:42.359 --> 0:17:45.520
<v Speaker 13>it really does. The fact that you've had this sort

0:17:45.560 --> 0:17:49.080
<v Speaker 13>of time out, the fact that you have two presidents

0:17:49.080 --> 0:17:53.560
<v Speaker 13>who are now tolking has at least cleared some of

0:17:53.600 --> 0:17:58.480
<v Speaker 13>the uncertainty. So earlier this year, ceo as were worried

0:17:58.520 --> 0:18:03.200
<v Speaker 13>about worst caseos. Right, So you had boardrooms looking at

0:18:03.320 --> 0:18:07.160
<v Speaker 13>trying to weigh the probability of a Chinese invasion of Taiwan.

0:18:08.520 --> 0:18:11.760
<v Speaker 13>You know, you had senior Pentagon figures coming out to say, yep,

0:18:11.880 --> 0:18:14.159
<v Speaker 13>you know we can see inside Tajen things. Mind he's

0:18:14.200 --> 0:18:16.880
<v Speaker 13>going to go in Before twenty twenty seven. You had

0:18:16.880 --> 0:18:19.359
<v Speaker 13>the head of the Navy saying it could be twenty

0:18:19.359 --> 0:18:21.680
<v Speaker 13>twenty four. In fact, it could be any time at all,

0:18:22.280 --> 0:18:24.440
<v Speaker 13>and so this has been this has been a big

0:18:24.480 --> 0:18:30.240
<v Speaker 13>deterrent to long term investment in China, the geopolitics of Taiwan,

0:18:30.320 --> 0:18:33.040
<v Speaker 13>the geopolitics of the South China Sea, on top of

0:18:33.720 --> 0:18:37.960
<v Speaker 13>a lot of very hostile regulation in China around data,

0:18:38.400 --> 0:18:42.960
<v Speaker 13>around national security, anti espionage. You had Chinese police raids

0:18:43.080 --> 0:18:46.800
<v Speaker 13>on the Mints group, on Bain and so on and

0:18:47.000 --> 0:18:50.840
<v Speaker 13>all together you wrap it all up, and CEOs have

0:18:51.000 --> 0:18:55.719
<v Speaker 13>been concerned frankly about their personal safety in China, issues

0:18:55.760 --> 0:18:58.480
<v Speaker 13>about whether they should go or not, and if they go,

0:18:58.640 --> 0:19:01.200
<v Speaker 13>should they wipe their laptop? Yes, we'll leave them at home.

0:19:01.240 --> 0:19:04.359
<v Speaker 6>Even better, I got to ask you, since you bring

0:19:04.480 --> 0:19:06.719
<v Speaker 6>up Taiwan and how big of an issue it is.

0:19:06.960 --> 0:19:10.560
<v Speaker 6>The opposition parties in Taiwan have agreed to join forces

0:19:11.200 --> 0:19:15.000
<v Speaker 6>ahead of the critical presidential election next year. That increases

0:19:15.000 --> 0:19:17.160
<v Speaker 6>the odds slightly that you might get a more pro

0:19:17.400 --> 0:19:21.719
<v Speaker 6>China government in Taiwan elected next year. What does that

0:19:21.760 --> 0:19:23.840
<v Speaker 6>do to any kind of timeline that people are putting

0:19:23.840 --> 0:19:27.720
<v Speaker 6>out there about a possible Chinese attempt to unify with Taiwan.

0:19:28.040 --> 0:19:31.920
<v Speaker 13>Right, so, these timelines were all extremely speculative to start with.

0:19:31.960 --> 0:19:34.080
<v Speaker 13>I mean, really, the only date we have is that

0:19:34.400 --> 0:19:37.760
<v Speaker 13>cjmping has told the People's Liberation Army it should be

0:19:37.840 --> 0:19:42.280
<v Speaker 13>ready by twenty twenty seven. So actually I think this

0:19:42.359 --> 0:19:45.399
<v Speaker 13>is a big deal. It wasn't so long ago that

0:19:45.440 --> 0:19:49.119
<v Speaker 13>William Laie of the ruling Democratic Progressive Party was a

0:19:49.160 --> 0:19:52.159
<v Speaker 13>shoe in, all right, and he has a history of

0:19:53.640 --> 0:19:58.720
<v Speaker 13>fairly strong support for a provide and its position. And

0:19:58.760 --> 0:20:03.960
<v Speaker 13>now you have the opposition agreeing to unite behind a

0:20:04.000 --> 0:20:07.480
<v Speaker 13>single ticket and they will have a series of internal

0:20:07.520 --> 0:20:10.520
<v Speaker 13>external polls to see who that should be, all broken

0:20:10.560 --> 0:20:15.480
<v Speaker 13>by former President maying two and China would Now I

0:20:15.520 --> 0:20:18.280
<v Speaker 13>don't know whether that how to what extent that change

0:20:18.280 --> 0:20:20.400
<v Speaker 13>of the game, but it certainly does make the likelihood

0:20:20.400 --> 0:20:22.199
<v Speaker 13>of a William Lyve presidency.

0:20:21.720 --> 0:20:23.919
<v Speaker 6>So much less and that would be good news for

0:20:23.920 --> 0:20:27.840
<v Speaker 6>anyone looking for come in the South China. See Andy Brown,

0:20:27.880 --> 0:20:30.159
<v Speaker 6>really appreciate your joining us. Andy Brown as partner with

0:20:30.240 --> 0:20:33.359
<v Speaker 6>the Brunswick Group, former editorial director of the Bloomberg New

0:20:33.400 --> 0:20:34.520
<v Speaker 6>Economy Forum.

0:20:34.560 --> 0:20:35.280
<v Speaker 4>This is Bloomberg.

0:20:36.480 --> 0:20:40.040
<v Speaker 3>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week Podcast. Catch us

0:20:40.080 --> 0:20:44.119
<v Speaker 3>live weekday afternoons from three to six Easter on Bloomberg Radio,

0:20:44.320 --> 0:20:47.600
<v Speaker 3>The Bloomberg Business app and YouTube. You can also listen

0:20:47.680 --> 0:20:50.800
<v Speaker 3>live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station.

0:20:51.240 --> 0:20:54.360
<v Speaker 3>Just say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:20:55.840 --> 0:20:56.159
<v Speaker 12>Billy.

0:20:56.359 --> 0:20:58.760
<v Speaker 6>You and I were talking earlier about Joe Biden and she,

0:20:58.840 --> 0:20:59.840
<v Speaker 6>Jim Hingk's meeting and St.

0:21:00.000 --> 0:21:00.480
<v Speaker 4>Francisco.

0:21:00.600 --> 0:21:03.359
<v Speaker 6>For all that it accomplished or didn't accomplish, there was

0:21:03.440 --> 0:21:07.119
<v Speaker 6>one small victory, which is the likely return of panda.

0:21:06.720 --> 0:21:08.440
<v Speaker 4>Bears to US zoo's.

0:21:08.920 --> 0:21:11.639
<v Speaker 6>Earlier this month, the three panda bears at Washington, DC's

0:21:11.720 --> 0:21:14.399
<v Speaker 6>National Zoo were returned to China following the expiration of

0:21:14.400 --> 0:21:18.280
<v Speaker 6>a three year contract with the China's Wildlife Agency. So

0:21:18.320 --> 0:21:20.399
<v Speaker 6>we want to bring in now Elena Songster. She is

0:21:20.400 --> 0:21:23.040
<v Speaker 6>a professor at Saint Mary's College of California. She is

0:21:23.119 --> 0:21:26.560
<v Speaker 6>author of Panda Nation, which is a book about China's

0:21:26.760 --> 0:21:30.040
<v Speaker 6>panda policy. Elena, good to speak with you. I am

0:21:30.119 --> 0:21:33.399
<v Speaker 6>obsessed with panda bears because they're like giant children, but

0:21:33.480 --> 0:21:36.199
<v Speaker 6>also because Beijing has long used these creatures as a

0:21:36.200 --> 0:21:41.680
<v Speaker 6>way to curry favor, reward friends, and punish their enemies.

0:21:42.040 --> 0:21:45.280
<v Speaker 6>What can you tell us about the significance of pandas

0:21:45.680 --> 0:21:47.600
<v Speaker 6>to China?

0:21:48.040 --> 0:21:51.000
<v Speaker 14>So pandas are unique to China. They cannot be found

0:21:51.040 --> 0:21:56.640
<v Speaker 14>anywhere else. And one thing that I find particularly interesting

0:21:56.640 --> 0:21:59.240
<v Speaker 14>that I discovered in my research about pandas is that

0:22:00.080 --> 0:22:03.760
<v Speaker 14>they are not connected with any of the more ancient

0:22:04.200 --> 0:22:09.800
<v Speaker 14>kind of historical cultural symbolism, and so they're really only

0:22:09.880 --> 0:22:13.200
<v Speaker 14>become significant culturally for China in the twentieth century.

0:22:14.400 --> 0:22:18.240
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I'm really interested in who pays for these flights

0:22:18.359 --> 0:22:21.000
<v Speaker 5>because they just sent back the pandas and now they're returning.

0:22:21.320 --> 0:22:24.159
<v Speaker 5>Is that something that the Chinese government is funding? Are

0:22:24.200 --> 0:22:27.000
<v Speaker 5>American taxpayers funding that that?

0:22:27.040 --> 0:22:30.280
<v Speaker 14>Actually, I do not know. That's a good question. It

0:22:30.440 --> 0:22:35.040
<v Speaker 14>must be wrapped into the exchange agreement in some way.

0:22:35.119 --> 0:22:36.640
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, these exchange agreements.

0:22:36.680 --> 0:22:40.120
<v Speaker 6>It's interesting because when there are pandas from China coming

0:22:40.160 --> 0:22:42.880
<v Speaker 6>to the US, they're not gifted to the US. They're

0:22:42.880 --> 0:22:45.679
<v Speaker 6>on loan, and the US actually has to pay for

0:22:45.760 --> 0:22:50.320
<v Speaker 6>these pandas, right correct. According to a survey by nique

0:22:50.320 --> 0:22:54.080
<v Speaker 6>Asia Bailey, zoos typically pay a million dollars a year

0:22:54.160 --> 0:22:55.439
<v Speaker 6>for a pair of panda pairs.

0:22:55.680 --> 0:22:59.280
<v Speaker 15>Now, my question is, when the pandas come from China

0:22:59.800 --> 0:23:03.520
<v Speaker 15>and they pro create in a US zoo, is the

0:23:03.560 --> 0:23:06.440
<v Speaker 15>baby panda US citizen a check?

0:23:06.480 --> 0:23:11.199
<v Speaker 14>Though no, baby panda belongs to China. That's part of

0:23:11.280 --> 0:23:15.640
<v Speaker 14>the agreement that and not only does the baby panda

0:23:15.800 --> 0:23:19.600
<v Speaker 14>belong to China, but the US zus pay an additional

0:23:19.680 --> 0:23:22.679
<v Speaker 14>fee when they have a privilege of having a baby panda.

0:23:23.280 --> 0:23:28.200
<v Speaker 5>Wow, so it cost you money to have a baby panda, Yes, but.

0:23:28.240 --> 0:23:29.760
<v Speaker 14>You also make a lot of money when you have

0:23:29.760 --> 0:23:30.480
<v Speaker 14>a baby panda.

0:23:31.200 --> 0:23:32.680
<v Speaker 8>The pros and cons.

0:23:32.680 --> 0:23:36.560
<v Speaker 5>So if pandas, if and wind pandas come back, what

0:23:36.640 --> 0:23:38.800
<v Speaker 5>does that rollout look like? Is it all at once?

0:23:38.840 --> 0:23:41.560
<v Speaker 5>They just kind of deploy a bunch of planes with

0:23:41.720 --> 0:23:45.119
<v Speaker 5>pandas eating and sleeping across the Atlantic?

0:23:46.359 --> 0:23:50.199
<v Speaker 14>Probably highly unlikely. I don't know, but I suspect that

0:23:50.280 --> 0:23:54.760
<v Speaker 14>it will be another pair of pandas that will be

0:23:54.840 --> 0:23:59.879
<v Speaker 14>of madeable age. That would it sounds like go to

0:23:59.920 --> 0:24:02.720
<v Speaker 14>the San Diego Zoo based on what Chi Jinping said

0:24:03.160 --> 0:24:03.920
<v Speaker 14>this past week.

0:24:04.359 --> 0:24:06.919
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, which makes me wonder why did they let the

0:24:06.960 --> 0:24:10.960
<v Speaker 6>contract lapse and send back the national zoo pandas? Is

0:24:11.000 --> 0:24:14.040
<v Speaker 6>it because they're setting up for Xi Jinping to announce

0:24:14.119 --> 0:24:17.399
<v Speaker 6>that they would resume the pandalons. Can you talk a

0:24:17.440 --> 0:24:20.679
<v Speaker 6>little bit about how China has used pandas as a

0:24:20.720 --> 0:24:21.800
<v Speaker 6>form of soft power.

0:24:23.040 --> 0:24:23.639
<v Speaker 14>Yeah. Sure.

0:24:23.720 --> 0:24:24.040
<v Speaker 12>So the.

0:24:25.720 --> 0:24:29.679
<v Speaker 14>Most kind of monumental example of this, of course, is

0:24:29.720 --> 0:24:33.560
<v Speaker 14>the nineteen seventy two gift to the United States that

0:24:33.720 --> 0:24:37.440
<v Speaker 14>was offered during Richard Nixon's President Nixon's visit to China,

0:24:37.480 --> 0:24:40.760
<v Speaker 14>which was monumental on many fronts, but mainly because the

0:24:40.840 --> 0:24:43.240
<v Speaker 14>US and China were enemy states at the time, and

0:24:43.320 --> 0:24:47.120
<v Speaker 14>so this was really a top secret visit and when

0:24:47.160 --> 0:24:49.119
<v Speaker 14>it happened, it was a shock to a lot of

0:24:49.119 --> 0:24:54.200
<v Speaker 14>people around the globe, and it really was an expression

0:24:54.520 --> 0:24:57.919
<v Speaker 14>of this very high profile expression of warming relations between

0:24:57.920 --> 0:25:01.280
<v Speaker 14>these two countries. And then it came with this, because

0:25:01.400 --> 0:25:05.520
<v Speaker 14>it came with this gift of pandas to the United States,

0:25:05.680 --> 0:25:07.960
<v Speaker 14>that suddenly kind of imbued the pandas with all of

0:25:08.000 --> 0:25:12.240
<v Speaker 14>this kind of intense symbolic meaning. And that was then

0:25:12.680 --> 0:25:17.840
<v Speaker 14>repeated almost immediately when Japan normalized relations with China just

0:25:17.960 --> 0:25:22.080
<v Speaker 14>months later, and then subsequently to several other countries. And

0:25:22.160 --> 0:25:25.240
<v Speaker 14>so the first stage of panda diplomacy were these kind

0:25:25.240 --> 0:25:30.040
<v Speaker 14>of high profile gifts. But then that shifted to loans,

0:25:30.200 --> 0:25:33.080
<v Speaker 14>in part because China was worried about giving away its

0:25:33.119 --> 0:25:36.399
<v Speaker 14>pandas without a clear understanding of how many it had

0:25:36.960 --> 0:25:41.479
<v Speaker 14>and how sustainable that process, and that process was and

0:25:41.560 --> 0:25:45.560
<v Speaker 14>so they switched to short term loans. But these weren't

0:25:45.720 --> 0:25:49.280
<v Speaker 14>very well structured. They weren't good for the individual pandas,

0:25:49.359 --> 0:25:53.840
<v Speaker 14>their money wasn't necessarily going through the conservation of the

0:25:53.840 --> 0:25:58.480
<v Speaker 14>wild population, and so it came under heavy criticism and

0:25:59.400 --> 0:26:04.199
<v Speaker 14>pressure came from animal experts that this had to stop,

0:26:04.440 --> 0:26:07.840
<v Speaker 14>and so they brought that to a close in the

0:26:07.920 --> 0:26:11.080
<v Speaker 14>early nineteen nineties in the United States, though it continued

0:26:11.119 --> 0:26:15.320
<v Speaker 14>in other places until the early two thousands, and a

0:26:15.400 --> 0:26:20.520
<v Speaker 14>group of experts, along with Chinese scientists and officials, came

0:26:20.560 --> 0:26:25.160
<v Speaker 14>together and created this long term scientific loan for which

0:26:25.440 --> 0:26:28.040
<v Speaker 14>San Diego was the first model, and that started in

0:26:28.200 --> 0:26:32.119
<v Speaker 14>nineteen ninety six and as of two thousand seven, I

0:26:32.200 --> 0:26:35.879
<v Speaker 14>believe all of the subsequent loans around the world are

0:26:35.920 --> 0:26:37.160
<v Speaker 14>based on this model.

0:26:37.640 --> 0:26:39.920
<v Speaker 5>And we know about the Taylor Swift economy. Is there

0:26:40.040 --> 0:26:43.919
<v Speaker 5>a panda economy if and when they returned to San Diego, Like,

0:26:44.000 --> 0:26:46.560
<v Speaker 5>how much revenue are we talking? This potentially could drive?

0:26:47.960 --> 0:26:48.280
<v Speaker 8>Yeah.

0:26:48.320 --> 0:26:50.240
<v Speaker 14>So, I mean, this is one of the reasons the

0:26:50.280 --> 0:26:57.040
<v Speaker 14>pandas are so expensive to have for an institution. One

0:26:57.040 --> 0:27:00.200
<v Speaker 14>of the reasons that the fee is a million dollars

0:27:00.200 --> 0:27:03.280
<v Speaker 14>a year usually is because prior to that, during the

0:27:03.440 --> 0:27:06.840
<v Speaker 14>short term loan phase, which occurred from eighty four to

0:27:06.960 --> 0:27:14.479
<v Speaker 14>ninety two, the the institutions that were hosting the hosting

0:27:14.520 --> 0:27:18.399
<v Speaker 14>these pandas they were making all kinds of money, like

0:27:18.440 --> 0:27:23.920
<v Speaker 14>millions of dollars a year, and or just within months actually,

0:27:23.960 --> 0:27:27.119
<v Speaker 14>because they only had them for a few months, and

0:27:27.200 --> 0:27:30.200
<v Speaker 14>so they were seen as like profiting off of these

0:27:30.240 --> 0:27:33.879
<v Speaker 14>precious species, and so that was a violation of sites

0:27:34.000 --> 0:27:37.480
<v Speaker 14>the ITES, which is the Convention on International Trade and

0:27:37.560 --> 0:27:38.600
<v Speaker 14>Endangered Species.

0:27:38.720 --> 0:27:41.840
<v Speaker 15>Hey, real quick before you go, Ilina, if Bailey were

0:27:41.880 --> 0:27:44.600
<v Speaker 15>to climb the fence at the zoo and jump in

0:27:44.640 --> 0:27:47.280
<v Speaker 15>the cage with the pandas, would they tear his face off?

0:27:47.359 --> 0:27:49.520
<v Speaker 15>I mean, they're cute, but I don't know anything about

0:27:49.600 --> 0:27:53.000
<v Speaker 15>Are they violent or like cuddly little bears like we

0:27:53.080 --> 0:27:58.120
<v Speaker 15>all think they are? Yes, guess what they face off

0:27:58.320 --> 0:27:59.440
<v Speaker 15>because I'd like to see that.

0:28:00.359 --> 0:28:04.000
<v Speaker 14>So there have been actual instances of the situation you

0:28:04.200 --> 0:28:08.159
<v Speaker 14>just described. An individual jumped into an enclosure in China

0:28:08.160 --> 0:28:11.879
<v Speaker 14>and tried to hug a panda bear and that person

0:28:11.960 --> 0:28:13.880
<v Speaker 14>was mauled and ended up in the hospital. So that's

0:28:13.920 --> 0:28:16.560
<v Speaker 14>a really bad idea and highly not recommended.

0:28:16.800 --> 0:28:17.159
<v Speaker 15>Don't do that.

0:28:17.320 --> 0:28:19.159
<v Speaker 5>Well, that's why I like red pandas because they're not

0:28:19.160 --> 0:28:20.280
<v Speaker 5>related to Yeah yeah.

0:28:20.840 --> 0:28:23.840
<v Speaker 14>On the flip side, they're not aggressive in the same

0:28:24.000 --> 0:28:26.160
<v Speaker 14>order as say, Grizzly or polar Bear.

0:28:26.320 --> 0:28:30.480
<v Speaker 15>Okay, all right, we'll leave it there. So there. Yeah,

0:28:30.800 --> 0:28:31.800
<v Speaker 15>the free question.

0:28:32.440 --> 0:28:35.640
<v Speaker 6>John Tucker was waiting, dying to ask that question. Really

0:28:35.680 --> 0:28:40.480
<v Speaker 6>appreciate your joining us. Alena Songster, the author of pand Nation,

0:28:40.720 --> 0:28:44.120
<v Speaker 6>also Associate professor of History at Saint Mary's College of California.

0:28:45.400 --> 0:28:49.000
<v Speaker 3>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week podcast. Catch us

0:28:49.040 --> 0:28:53.040
<v Speaker 3>live weekday afternoons from three to six Eastern on Bloomberg Radio,

0:28:53.240 --> 0:28:56.520
<v Speaker 3>the Bloomberg Business app, and YouTube. You can also listen

0:28:56.600 --> 0:28:59.720
<v Speaker 3>live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station.

0:29:00.200 --> 0:29:02.560
<v Speaker 3>Just say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven.

0:29:05.800 --> 0:29:08.240
<v Speaker 6>We did get some data this morning. New US home

0:29:08.280 --> 0:29:11.040
<v Speaker 6>construction unexpectedly rose in October. That is a sign that

0:29:11.160 --> 0:29:14.240
<v Speaker 6>builders continue to benefit from a limited supply in the

0:29:14.280 --> 0:29:17.200
<v Speaker 6>resale market. I want to bring in Kate Kaminski. She

0:29:17.280 --> 0:29:20.040
<v Speaker 6>is the chief operating officer of Walton Global, which is

0:29:20.640 --> 0:29:23.840
<v Speaker 6>a privately owned land asset and real estate investment company

0:29:23.880 --> 0:29:26.560
<v Speaker 6>with about three point six billion dollars in assets. Kate

0:29:26.640 --> 0:29:29.480
<v Speaker 6>joins us by Zoom from Scottsdale, Arizona.

0:29:29.600 --> 0:29:30.680
<v Speaker 4>Kate, good to speak with you.

0:29:31.120 --> 0:29:33.120
<v Speaker 6>Can you give us a sense of what the housing

0:29:33.200 --> 0:29:36.400
<v Speaker 6>market in Scottsdale, Arizona, part of the Sun Belt looks

0:29:36.480 --> 0:29:38.680
<v Speaker 6>like versus the rest of the country.

0:29:40.800 --> 0:29:42.800
<v Speaker 9>Thanks for having me. I was hoping we were going

0:29:42.840 --> 0:29:44.240
<v Speaker 9>to talk about pandas today.

0:29:45.120 --> 0:29:47.200
<v Speaker 4>Wait, are you a fan of better black and white pandas?

0:29:48.240 --> 0:29:51.720
<v Speaker 9>I like the black and white ones too, but housing,

0:29:52.680 --> 0:29:56.680
<v Speaker 9>how about those numbers today? Really excited to see the result.

0:29:56.920 --> 0:30:00.600
<v Speaker 9>And I have to say that that is really consistent

0:30:00.760 --> 0:30:03.360
<v Speaker 9>with what I was hearing last week. Was that a

0:30:03.480 --> 0:30:07.120
<v Speaker 9>prominent real estate conference in New York City. We had

0:30:07.320 --> 0:30:10.440
<v Speaker 9>everyone from the investment side of the business, to home

0:30:10.440 --> 0:30:15.200
<v Speaker 9>building to supply chain all there and sentiment in the

0:30:15.280 --> 0:30:18.360
<v Speaker 9>room was high, so much higher than the same conference

0:30:18.520 --> 0:30:21.320
<v Speaker 9>just a year ago. And I think that that's really

0:30:21.360 --> 0:30:24.120
<v Speaker 9>representative of what we're seeing in these numbers that came

0:30:24.160 --> 0:30:29.840
<v Speaker 9>out today with over thirteen percent increases in starts and permits.

0:30:30.160 --> 0:30:31.720
<v Speaker 8>Keith, what is driving the optimism?

0:30:31.840 --> 0:30:34.320
<v Speaker 5>Is it just the pent up demand for houses in

0:30:34.360 --> 0:30:36.360
<v Speaker 5>the fact that there's not a ton of supply of

0:30:37.000 --> 0:30:38.960
<v Speaker 5>non new or existing homes.

0:30:40.040 --> 0:30:44.160
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, I mean, it's definitely a factor of that lock

0:30:44.200 --> 0:30:45.360
<v Speaker 9>in effect that we're.

0:30:45.200 --> 0:30:47.640
<v Speaker 12>Seeing with the existing home sales.

0:30:48.440 --> 0:30:53.120
<v Speaker 9>You know, builders are really benefiting from rates being where

0:30:53.120 --> 0:30:55.520
<v Speaker 9>they're at and people that are locked in, you know,

0:30:55.720 --> 0:30:59.320
<v Speaker 9>under five four percent not having a desire to sell

0:30:59.320 --> 0:31:02.040
<v Speaker 9>at this point because of what the cost of moving

0:31:02.080 --> 0:31:05.880
<v Speaker 9>into a new home would be. So builders are experiencing

0:31:06.360 --> 0:31:09.960
<v Speaker 9>market share that is totally out of.

0:31:10.600 --> 0:31:14.200
<v Speaker 12>The norm and really benefiting from that.

0:31:14.880 --> 0:31:17.720
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, there's some data from a consulting firm called Zanda

0:31:17.760 --> 0:31:20.560
<v Speaker 6>that indicates new homes now account for a third of

0:31:20.680 --> 0:31:24.600
<v Speaker 6>available inventory versus the typical ten percent. Is this a

0:31:24.680 --> 0:31:27.280
<v Speaker 6>new Is this now the new normal to have new

0:31:27.280 --> 0:31:29.680
<v Speaker 6>homes account for a third of available inventory or is

0:31:29.720 --> 0:31:30.360
<v Speaker 6>this temporary?

0:31:31.680 --> 0:31:33.720
<v Speaker 9>I think that this is going to be here to

0:31:33.760 --> 0:31:37.040
<v Speaker 9>stay for a little while because people are going to

0:31:37.040 --> 0:31:41.280
<v Speaker 9>benefit from those rates that they're locked into for a while. So,

0:31:41.840 --> 0:31:45.600
<v Speaker 9>you know, there is a fundamental need for new housing supply,

0:31:46.160 --> 0:31:49.240
<v Speaker 9>and the builders are are the ones who are going

0:31:49.280 --> 0:31:52.120
<v Speaker 9>to be able to provide that as we see, you know,

0:31:52.200 --> 0:31:56.600
<v Speaker 9>these historically low levels of resale inventory. I think that

0:31:56.920 --> 0:32:00.920
<v Speaker 9>the builders are also going to continue to command market

0:32:00.960 --> 0:32:04.520
<v Speaker 9>share because of what they're doing with their rate buydown programs.

0:32:05.080 --> 0:32:10.320
<v Speaker 9>They're getting people into homes at what continues to be

0:32:10.520 --> 0:32:15.320
<v Speaker 9>kind of the level that consumers seem comfortable with, which

0:32:15.360 --> 0:32:18.120
<v Speaker 9>is around that five percent. So we're seeing builders across

0:32:18.200 --> 0:32:22.120
<v Speaker 9>the board really pushing these programs of buying down the

0:32:22.160 --> 0:32:25.200
<v Speaker 9>mortgage rates, which are sitting at what seven point three

0:32:25.240 --> 0:32:29.680
<v Speaker 9>percent today down to five and a half just below that,

0:32:30.480 --> 0:32:33.480
<v Speaker 9>which is where you're seeing a lot of consumers comfortable.

0:32:33.640 --> 0:32:36.160
<v Speaker 5>And looking at what the rates environment is showing right now.

0:32:36.320 --> 0:32:40.480
<v Speaker 5>Baking in three fed cuts for next year. What happens

0:32:40.720 --> 0:32:45.120
<v Speaker 5>with the home construction new home construction market in twenty

0:32:45.160 --> 0:32:48.120
<v Speaker 5>twenty four, if in fact we do see rates continue

0:32:48.120 --> 0:32:48.520
<v Speaker 5>to come.

0:32:48.400 --> 0:32:52.320
<v Speaker 9>Down, Yeah, I think it's going to continue to escalate.

0:32:52.720 --> 0:32:55.080
<v Speaker 9>I mean, all of the home builder stocks are up

0:32:55.720 --> 0:33:00.880
<v Speaker 9>and they're definitely looking to increase community count Walton. You know,

0:33:00.920 --> 0:33:04.280
<v Speaker 9>we're really focused on an earlier stage in the cycle

0:33:04.360 --> 0:33:09.160
<v Speaker 9>as compared to the development or building side. We're buying

0:33:09.320 --> 0:33:12.040
<v Speaker 9>land to feed to these builders that's really in the

0:33:12.080 --> 0:33:15.200
<v Speaker 9>path of growth, and we're seeing an acceleration in the

0:33:15.240 --> 0:33:18.719
<v Speaker 9>deals that we're putting under contract because these builders are

0:33:18.760 --> 0:33:22.600
<v Speaker 9>really looking to secure that supply because they continue to

0:33:23.040 --> 0:33:26.360
<v Speaker 9>see the demands. So we're seeing builders continue to build

0:33:26.360 --> 0:33:30.280
<v Speaker 9>on spec because they're seeing that turnover in their inventory,

0:33:30.480 --> 0:33:34.000
<v Speaker 9>and we're expecting that that community count's going to continue

0:33:34.000 --> 0:33:39.360
<v Speaker 9>to increase and that demand is not going to decline

0:33:39.360 --> 0:33:40.080
<v Speaker 9>in the near term.

0:33:40.560 --> 0:33:42.440
<v Speaker 5>I look around in Jersey and I don't see any

0:33:42.520 --> 0:33:44.760
<v Speaker 5>undeveloped plan Where are you guys putting money to work

0:33:44.800 --> 0:33:46.840
<v Speaker 5>to and buying to sell to these homebuilders.

0:33:48.360 --> 0:33:51.520
<v Speaker 9>But we're really focused in the southern half of the US.

0:33:52.240 --> 0:33:57.800
<v Speaker 9>We focus on your typical, you know, market fundamentals such

0:33:57.800 --> 0:34:04.920
<v Speaker 9>as jobs, people, so migration into a market, and we're

0:34:04.960 --> 0:34:08.879
<v Speaker 9>looking to continue to expand where the builders are taking us,

0:34:09.760 --> 0:34:12.760
<v Speaker 9>and that is we're really seeing in that Sun Belt

0:34:12.800 --> 0:34:18.080
<v Speaker 9>region and particular states that continue to defile lodds like

0:34:18.160 --> 0:34:23.840
<v Speaker 9>Texas and Florida with staggering new home starts within those markets.

0:34:24.320 --> 0:34:26.120
<v Speaker 6>We were talking about a story that was very well

0:34:26.120 --> 0:34:28.480
<v Speaker 6>read on the Bloomberg today about how almost forty percent

0:34:28.480 --> 0:34:31.440
<v Speaker 6>of US homeowners are mortgage free and the majority of

0:34:31.480 --> 0:34:34.479
<v Speaker 6>these homeowners are retirement age and a lot of them

0:34:34.760 --> 0:34:37.880
<v Speaker 6>are basically cashing in on their homes in the Northeast

0:34:37.880 --> 0:34:41.200
<v Speaker 6>and then selling those and going to buy homes in

0:34:41.320 --> 0:34:42.000
<v Speaker 6>the sun Belt.

0:34:42.120 --> 0:34:44.959
<v Speaker 4>How does that distort this current housing market?

0:34:46.360 --> 0:34:49.759
<v Speaker 9>So, you know, I think that from a new home

0:34:49.800 --> 0:34:55.440
<v Speaker 9>building perspective, we're still seeing that, you know, help the

0:34:55.520 --> 0:34:59.320
<v Speaker 9>demand side because we're seeing a lot of active adult

0:34:59.320 --> 0:35:03.040
<v Speaker 9>communities pop up within the states that I just mentioned.

0:35:03.320 --> 0:35:04.680
<v Speaker 12>That continues to be a.

0:35:04.560 --> 0:35:08.399
<v Speaker 9>Product that you know, we're they're really driving within each

0:35:08.440 --> 0:35:11.920
<v Speaker 9>of those markets. And and so I think even though you're

0:35:11.960 --> 0:35:15.000
<v Speaker 9>going to maybe see some resale inventory creep up in

0:35:15.040 --> 0:35:18.040
<v Speaker 9>those markets, you're you're going to see the demand for

0:35:18.200 --> 0:35:22.720
<v Speaker 9>new homes within those Sunbelt areas places looking for highly

0:35:22.760 --> 0:35:26.680
<v Speaker 9>amenditized communities, which you know, tend to be a lot

0:35:26.719 --> 0:35:29.520
<v Speaker 9>of your newer communities as compared to some you know,

0:35:29.600 --> 0:35:33.879
<v Speaker 9>older single homes that aren't going to have those recreational facilities.

0:35:33.920 --> 0:35:37.120
<v Speaker 9>And so we're we think that that continues to be

0:35:37.160 --> 0:35:40.240
<v Speaker 9>a great opportunity to expand hard share.

0:35:40.520 --> 0:35:43.080
<v Speaker 6>Kate really appreciate your joining us. Kate Kaminski is Chief

0:35:43.120 --> 0:35:47.279
<v Speaker 6>operating Officer at Walton Global, joining us from Scottsdale, Arizona.

0:35:47.520 --> 0:35:54.640
<v Speaker 4>This is Bloombergmark.

0:35:53.640 --> 0:35:55.520
<v Speaker 12>Journal about you.

0:35:55.600 --> 0:36:00.800
<v Speaker 13>Let me drive, No, No, No, All right, how do the

0:36:00.840 --> 0:36:03.680
<v Speaker 13>driving gravelst mate, I want to try it.

0:36:05.920 --> 0:36:07.880
<v Speaker 12>It's a good question, drives.

0:36:10.600 --> 0:36:13.520
<v Speaker 3>This is the drive to the clothes. Do to me?

0:36:13.719 --> 0:36:13.879
<v Speaker 8>Think?

0:36:13.960 --> 0:36:15.600
<v Speaker 12>Well, yoga don.

0:36:15.800 --> 0:36:19.400
<v Speaker 6>On Bloomberg Radio, it is time for the drive to

0:36:19.440 --> 0:36:22.279
<v Speaker 6>the clothes. And today joining us is Sylvia Jablonski. She's

0:36:22.320 --> 0:36:26.640
<v Speaker 6>CEO and CIO at Defiance ETFs. I'm Scarlet fou here

0:36:26.640 --> 0:36:27.759
<v Speaker 6>with Bailly Lipschultz.

0:36:28.160 --> 0:36:29.920
<v Speaker 4>Sylvia. Great to have you on.

0:36:30.480 --> 0:36:33.360
<v Speaker 6>As much as there's little action in the indexes today,

0:36:33.520 --> 0:36:35.919
<v Speaker 6>we do see stock indexes firmly higher for the week.

0:36:36.000 --> 0:36:38.680
<v Speaker 4>So the November rally fear not is intact.

0:36:39.160 --> 0:36:41.560
<v Speaker 6>The S and P five hundred remains above forty five hundred,

0:36:41.600 --> 0:36:44.000
<v Speaker 6>but the pace of gains is definitely slowed compared with

0:36:44.440 --> 0:36:46.840
<v Speaker 6>let's say two and a half weeks ago. Treasury yields

0:36:47.080 --> 0:36:50.440
<v Speaker 6>for change are a little changed, Sylvia. Have we gone

0:36:50.480 --> 0:36:53.080
<v Speaker 6>from over sold to overbought and we're just kind of

0:36:53.120 --> 0:36:54.520
<v Speaker 6>stuck waiting for new catalysts?

0:36:54.560 --> 0:36:57.640
<v Speaker 12>Now, Hi, Scarlett, good afternoon.

0:36:58.480 --> 0:37:01.160
<v Speaker 11>You know I think that with that kind of let's

0:37:01.160 --> 0:37:03.719
<v Speaker 11>call it short term emic rally like this, it's it's

0:37:03.760 --> 0:37:06.240
<v Speaker 11>not unusual to set, you know, to see a little

0:37:06.239 --> 0:37:07.080
<v Speaker 11>bit of a pause in that.

0:37:07.280 --> 0:37:11.400
<v Speaker 12>So I don't think that you know we're necessarily and overbought.

0:37:11.440 --> 0:37:13.640
<v Speaker 11>I do you think that you know, we've transitioned closer

0:37:13.680 --> 0:37:16.960
<v Speaker 11>to overbought than than you know, we were to oversold

0:37:17.000 --> 0:37:19.640
<v Speaker 11>before because of the rally this week. But I think

0:37:19.680 --> 0:37:22.400
<v Speaker 11>that stocks are just taking a breather, and you know,

0:37:22.520 --> 0:37:25.480
<v Speaker 11>the story for a year end rally or at least

0:37:25.520 --> 0:37:28.040
<v Speaker 11>sustaining what we've already got maybe moving up a little

0:37:28.080 --> 0:37:29.160
<v Speaker 11>bit more, remains intact.

0:37:29.239 --> 0:37:31.480
<v Speaker 12>You know, we have seasonal headwinds. Now, we have a

0:37:31.480 --> 0:37:32.400
<v Speaker 12>strong consumer.

0:37:33.239 --> 0:37:35.279
<v Speaker 11>As you said, the ten years a little unchanged, but

0:37:35.320 --> 0:37:37.600
<v Speaker 11>it's certainly changed, you know, down from five percent in

0:37:37.640 --> 0:37:40.720
<v Speaker 11>recent weeks. The FED is is kind of more stable,

0:37:41.360 --> 0:37:43.640
<v Speaker 11>leaning on even dubvish, and I think the market like

0:37:43.680 --> 0:37:45.680
<v Speaker 11>that in the short term, and I think that you know,

0:37:45.719 --> 0:37:48.239
<v Speaker 11>that gives us some momentum in trading, and.

0:37:48.200 --> 0:37:52.280
<v Speaker 5>Sylvia, we'll get some more data before the next FED decision.

0:37:52.520 --> 0:37:56.280
<v Speaker 5>What can change is and do you see the inflation

0:37:56.360 --> 0:37:59.080
<v Speaker 5>data is potentially one offer a start of a really

0:37:59.120 --> 0:37:59.840
<v Speaker 5>strong trend.

0:38:01.680 --> 0:38:03.640
<v Speaker 11>I don't think it's the start of a really strong

0:38:03.760 --> 0:38:04.799
<v Speaker 11>trend necessarily.

0:38:05.160 --> 0:38:07.359
<v Speaker 12>You know, we might see another reader too.

0:38:07.440 --> 0:38:10.160
<v Speaker 11>That's that kind of stays in the same area might

0:38:10.200 --> 0:38:12.600
<v Speaker 11>even be a little bit you know, hotter than this

0:38:12.640 --> 0:38:15.480
<v Speaker 11>one was. But it's certainly very reassuring to have seen

0:38:15.560 --> 0:38:18.799
<v Speaker 11>this inflation data number. You know, we kind of break

0:38:18.800 --> 0:38:20.680
<v Speaker 11>it apart. Some of the interesting points of it were

0:38:21.360 --> 0:38:24.680
<v Speaker 11>reduce things like reduce costs of healthcare and things like that. So,

0:38:25.200 --> 0:38:27.880
<v Speaker 11>you know, I think it depends. I mean, what is

0:38:27.920 --> 0:38:30.600
<v Speaker 11>good is that the price of oil is lower. You know,

0:38:30.640 --> 0:38:33.440
<v Speaker 11>it looks like there's some ease across you know, the

0:38:33.560 --> 0:38:36.360
<v Speaker 11>various inflation points, which is very good for consumers. But

0:38:36.880 --> 0:38:38.879
<v Speaker 11>I think for the next couple of months it's probably

0:38:38.920 --> 0:38:41.000
<v Speaker 11>going to hover around where it is. Maybe it'll kind

0:38:41.000 --> 0:38:43.560
<v Speaker 11>of drop down a little bit. I don't think that

0:38:43.640 --> 0:38:46.640
<v Speaker 11>much will change the FAD's mind at this stage, unless

0:38:46.719 --> 0:38:49.480
<v Speaker 11>you know, unless it's a completely hot read out of

0:38:49.680 --> 0:38:52.320
<v Speaker 11>left field, and you know, fed share Palol did address

0:38:52.360 --> 0:38:55.520
<v Speaker 11>that right and in October, you know, he seemed a

0:38:55.520 --> 0:38:57.520
<v Speaker 11>little more doubbish than he did in kind of the

0:38:57.600 --> 0:39:00.439
<v Speaker 11>last meeting that we saw, where he almost said that, look,

0:39:00.840 --> 0:39:03.200
<v Speaker 11>we're open to head fakes, and if there are head fakes,

0:39:03.280 --> 0:39:05.560
<v Speaker 11>you know, have no doubt that we too will headfakes.

0:39:05.560 --> 0:39:07.680
<v Speaker 11>So you know, I think that'll be interesting to see.

0:39:08.360 --> 0:39:11.040
<v Speaker 6>You know, it's worth the note mentioning here that Microsoft

0:39:11.040 --> 0:39:13.120
<v Speaker 6>shares are down, and if you look at an inter

0:39:13.239 --> 0:39:16.719
<v Speaker 6>day chart, the stock did start losing ground right around

0:39:16.760 --> 0:39:19.360
<v Speaker 6>the time, Bailly, that we broke the news that Sam

0:39:19.400 --> 0:39:23.880
<v Speaker 6>Altman is departing open Ai after losing the confidence of

0:39:24.040 --> 0:39:27.200
<v Speaker 6>the board again. Sam Altman one of the co founders

0:39:27.239 --> 0:39:29.600
<v Speaker 6>of open Ai, one of those prominent figures in the

0:39:29.600 --> 0:39:30.360
<v Speaker 6>AI industry.

0:39:30.680 --> 0:39:31.920
<v Speaker 4>Leaving open Ai.

0:39:32.040 --> 0:39:35.440
<v Speaker 6>The chief technology officer will come in and become the

0:39:35.480 --> 0:39:39.880
<v Speaker 6>interim CEO. I bring this up, Sylvia, because Microsoft is

0:39:39.880 --> 0:39:42.920
<v Speaker 6>one of the stocks that you say is really a

0:39:43.000 --> 0:39:45.600
<v Speaker 6>leader among the tech firms in part because of that

0:39:45.680 --> 0:39:49.160
<v Speaker 6>open Ai investment. How much of that is pricedon, do

0:39:49.200 --> 0:39:49.520
<v Speaker 6>you think?

0:39:51.200 --> 0:39:53.759
<v Speaker 12>Yeah? I do think so. The news is pretty interesting, right,

0:39:53.760 --> 0:39:54.920
<v Speaker 12>and it's not surprising to.

0:39:56.440 --> 0:39:58.239
<v Speaker 11>See that the stock maybe fell off a little bit

0:39:58.280 --> 0:40:00.560
<v Speaker 11>of me today, you know, kind of fits and seven

0:40:00.840 --> 0:40:03.200
<v Speaker 11>have all done the same. But you know, you know,

0:40:03.200 --> 0:40:04.880
<v Speaker 11>we'll have to see how that impacts the stock and

0:40:04.920 --> 0:40:07.880
<v Speaker 11>what his role was in, you know, in terms of

0:40:07.880 --> 0:40:10.120
<v Speaker 11>like their allegiance with open Ai. I think it's a

0:40:10.200 --> 0:40:12.319
<v Speaker 11>huge part of Microsoft's success, and I do think that

0:40:12.400 --> 0:40:15.000
<v Speaker 11>open AI is priced in, but what is priced in

0:40:15.239 --> 0:40:15.640
<v Speaker 11>is the.

0:40:15.600 --> 0:40:16.479
<v Speaker 12>Other stuff they're doing.

0:40:16.520 --> 0:40:18.640
<v Speaker 11>You know, they're they're kind of you know, forever been

0:40:18.640 --> 0:40:20.600
<v Speaker 11>talking about their own AI chips.

0:40:20.600 --> 0:40:23.200
<v Speaker 12>We'll see where that goes. If you look at cloud growth, you.

0:40:23.200 --> 0:40:27.520
<v Speaker 11>Know, the last earning season, if Amazon Cloud grew twenty

0:40:27.560 --> 0:40:30.960
<v Speaker 11>six percent or sorry, twelve percent, Azure grew twenty six percent.

0:40:31.000 --> 0:40:32.880
<v Speaker 11>So they're starting to see like a faster growth rate

0:40:32.920 --> 0:40:36.240
<v Speaker 11>even though they're not the biggest cloud provider. Three sixty

0:40:36.239 --> 0:40:40.640
<v Speaker 11>five Coal Pilot is another AI solution, and forty percent

0:40:40.640 --> 0:40:43.120
<v Speaker 11>of S and P five hundred stocks actually subscribed to

0:40:43.160 --> 0:40:45.719
<v Speaker 11>that already, and they're picking up steam and momentum there.

0:40:45.960 --> 0:40:47.880
<v Speaker 11>And then you actually just have like the you know,

0:40:48.040 --> 0:40:52.400
<v Speaker 11>desktop upgrades and conversions, which we haven't really seen since COVID.

0:40:52.440 --> 0:40:55.000
<v Speaker 11>So I think that either way, Microsoft is going to

0:40:55.000 --> 0:40:56.560
<v Speaker 11>be fine, and there's a lot of reasons why.

0:40:56.640 --> 0:40:57.759
<v Speaker 12>That's why that stock can.

0:40:57.680 --> 0:41:00.920
<v Speaker 11>Continue to grow, quality stock, you know, it's just and

0:41:01.320 --> 0:41:02.160
<v Speaker 11>on a tear lately.

0:41:02.200 --> 0:41:03.480
<v Speaker 12>And I do think that they're going to play a

0:41:03.520 --> 0:41:04.239
<v Speaker 12>huge role in AI.

0:41:04.280 --> 0:41:07.640
<v Speaker 11>They've already sort of proved that, and I think this

0:41:07.719 --> 0:41:10.080
<v Speaker 11>news will just will probably you know, be a short

0:41:10.160 --> 0:41:13.760
<v Speaker 11>term dent in the stock will proborly move forward with innovations.

0:41:13.760 --> 0:41:15.840
<v Speaker 5>Sticking on that theme, another stock you like is in Vidia,

0:41:16.000 --> 0:41:18.480
<v Speaker 5>up two hundred and thirty six percent this year earnings

0:41:18.520 --> 0:41:19.640
<v Speaker 5>on Tuesday.

0:41:19.920 --> 0:41:20.839
<v Speaker 8>How high is the bar?

0:41:22.560 --> 0:41:24.719
<v Speaker 12>The bar is pretty high. The bar is pretty high,

0:41:24.719 --> 0:41:24.880
<v Speaker 12>you know.

0:41:25.040 --> 0:41:26.799
<v Speaker 11>I think in some of the areas that we're going

0:41:26.840 --> 0:41:31.080
<v Speaker 11>to be looking at is you know, kind of what

0:41:31.120 --> 0:41:33.440
<v Speaker 11>their growth is, right I think they talked about a

0:41:33.480 --> 0:41:36.200
<v Speaker 11>one hundred and seventy one percent in just one segment

0:41:36.320 --> 0:41:37.640
<v Speaker 11>data center last time around.

0:41:37.680 --> 0:41:40.000
<v Speaker 12>So we'll see, you know, kind of where that number

0:41:40.000 --> 0:41:40.680
<v Speaker 12>of lands. Now.

0:41:41.040 --> 0:41:43.239
<v Speaker 11>We know that they've been talking about one trillion dollars

0:41:43.280 --> 0:41:45.040
<v Speaker 11>of data setter conversions that have to happen.

0:41:45.120 --> 0:41:45.640
<v Speaker 12>We'll have to.

0:41:45.600 --> 0:41:47.640
<v Speaker 11>See, you know, how much of that one trillion is

0:41:47.680 --> 0:41:49.720
<v Speaker 11>starting to be captured in the near term there.

0:41:50.719 --> 0:41:52.440
<v Speaker 12>I think the bar is set really high.

0:41:52.480 --> 0:41:55.120
<v Speaker 11>But I also think that and Videos, you know, hands

0:41:55.160 --> 0:41:58.120
<v Speaker 11>down the leader in AI, the leader and chips they

0:41:58.120 --> 0:42:01.440
<v Speaker 11>own about ninety percent of the GPU market. So it'll

0:42:01.480 --> 0:42:03.920
<v Speaker 11>be you know, kind of really interesting to see if

0:42:03.960 --> 0:42:06.880
<v Speaker 11>the forward looking guidance is similar to what it was

0:42:06.960 --> 0:42:07.760
<v Speaker 11>last time around.

0:42:08.280 --> 0:42:10.719
<v Speaker 12>And the good thing about this is that Jensen.

0:42:10.440 --> 0:42:13.360
<v Speaker 11>Wong has actually given us you know, kind of concrete

0:42:13.400 --> 0:42:16.279
<v Speaker 11>data of what they see for forward looking demand. So

0:42:16.600 --> 0:42:18.680
<v Speaker 11>I think the question is sort of does he get

0:42:18.920 --> 0:42:22.280
<v Speaker 11>that demand that he's been you know, kind of publicly sharing.

0:42:22.360 --> 0:42:24.520
<v Speaker 11>If he does, then it's you know, the stock can

0:42:24.680 --> 0:42:27.200
<v Speaker 11>can move a little further and off to the races.

0:42:27.600 --> 0:42:30.160
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, but if you missed the boat on Nvidia, and

0:42:30.239 --> 0:42:33.360
<v Speaker 6>so many people did, the other way to play, you

0:42:33.400 --> 0:42:36.520
<v Speaker 6>point out, Sylvia, is to look at the runner up here,

0:42:36.520 --> 0:42:39.440
<v Speaker 6>and that might just be advanced micro devices. And when

0:42:39.480 --> 0:42:41.160
<v Speaker 6>I say runner up, that that's kind of a generous

0:42:41.200 --> 0:42:44.000
<v Speaker 6>way to put it because at most it makes up

0:42:44.040 --> 0:42:47.080
<v Speaker 6>what ten percent of the market share for the GPU market.

0:42:48.360 --> 0:42:50.960
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, ten percent of ten percent of GPU market and

0:42:51.280 --> 0:42:54.400
<v Speaker 11>growing right. And Lisa has just been I think a

0:42:54.440 --> 0:42:57.000
<v Speaker 11>really great transformative leader for that company. You know, she

0:42:57.120 --> 0:42:59.279
<v Speaker 11>kind of comes out of they might have a slow

0:42:59.360 --> 0:43:00.960
<v Speaker 11>quarter or tune and comes out a left field and

0:43:01.000 --> 0:43:03.839
<v Speaker 11>just you know, crushes it with numbers. Her projected out,

0:43:03.880 --> 0:43:07.760
<v Speaker 11>like I think was about nine percent revenue growth going forward.

0:43:08.560 --> 0:43:11.280
<v Speaker 12>They're seeing you know, some pickup and gaming.

0:43:11.000 --> 0:43:13.400
<v Speaker 11>Some of the chips that they have in things like xboxes,

0:43:13.480 --> 0:43:16.080
<v Speaker 11>and they have you know kind of the leadership and

0:43:16.160 --> 0:43:19.400
<v Speaker 11>electric vehicles. They're in testled vehicles, for example. So I

0:43:19.719 --> 0:43:21.840
<v Speaker 11>do think that you know, it's a lot cheaper in

0:43:21.920 --> 0:43:24.480
<v Speaker 11>terms of purchased price for the investor, and it's another

0:43:24.480 --> 0:43:25.160
<v Speaker 11>way to play AI.

0:43:25.680 --> 0:43:28.680
<v Speaker 6>All right, Sylvia, really appreciate your joining us. Sylvia Jablonski

0:43:28.719 --> 0:43:30.800
<v Speaker 6>of Courses with Defiance ETS.

0:43:30.840 --> 0:43:33.759
<v Speaker 4>She is the CEO and CIO at the firm. We

0:43:33.800 --> 0:43:36.040
<v Speaker 4>appreciate your joining us for our drive to the close.

0:43:36.320 --> 0:43:39.239
<v Speaker 6>We are looking at stock market indexes, little change up,

0:43:39.400 --> 0:43:41.040
<v Speaker 6>but for now the S and P five hundred might

0:43:41.080 --> 0:43:43.640
<v Speaker 6>just close out with a fourth straight day of games.

0:43:44.040 --> 0:43:44.840
<v Speaker 4>This is Bloomberg.

0:43:46.520 --> 0:43:49.759
<v Speaker 3>This is the Bloomberg Business Week podcast of a little

0:43:49.760 --> 0:43:53.320
<v Speaker 3>lot of Apple, Spotify and anywhere else you hit your podcast.

0:43:53.840 --> 0:43:57.040
<v Speaker 3>Listen live week day afternoons from three to six Eastern

0:43:57.280 --> 0:44:00.680
<v Speaker 3>on Bloomberg dot Com, the iHeartRadio app, tune In, and

0:44:00.800 --> 0:44:03.520
<v Speaker 3>the Bloomberg Business And you can also watch us live

0:44:03.640 --> 0:44:07.280
<v Speaker 3>every weekday on YouTube and always on the Bloomberg terminal.