WEBVTT - The Chip Supply Chain Is Getting Harder to Trade

0:00:01.800 --> 0:00:04.400
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week. I'm Carol Masser and I'm

0:00:04.440 --> 0:00:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stanivk. We're here every day bringing

0:00:07.280 --> 0:00:09.799
<v Speaker 1>you the latest news from the world of business and finance,

0:00:09.840 --> 0:00:13.640
<v Speaker 1>plus technology, politics, economics, all purtnising the power of Business

0:00:13.640 --> 0:00:17.119
<v Speaker 1>Week reporters and editors, not to mention our journalists and

0:00:17.160 --> 0:00:20.000
<v Speaker 1>analyst in more than one twenty countries. You can download

0:00:20.000 --> 0:00:23.479
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Weekend iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot Com. You

0:00:23.480 --> 0:00:25.440
<v Speaker 1>can also listen to our radio show at two pm

0:00:25.440 --> 0:00:28.360
<v Speaker 1>Eastern Time on Bloomberg Radio or watch us on YouTube

0:00:28.400 --> 0:00:32.720
<v Speaker 1>search Bloomberg Global News. Well, yes, the sector I stole

0:00:32.760 --> 0:00:34.840
<v Speaker 1>for Tim for the top of our three pm simulcast,

0:00:34.920 --> 0:00:38.599
<v Speaker 1>it is the semiconductor index. The socks rear seeing chip

0:00:38.600 --> 0:00:41.960
<v Speaker 1>stocks jump today, Sam, some electronics coming out with better

0:00:41.960 --> 0:00:44.320
<v Speaker 1>than anticipated jump in revenue, and that really just sent

0:00:44.400 --> 0:00:48.440
<v Speaker 1>the whole sector booming in uh, the U S trade.

0:00:48.479 --> 0:00:49.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean it also sent it booming over in the

0:00:50.000 --> 0:00:52.840
<v Speaker 1>Agia trade. Overnight. You have a really interesting commentary coming

0:00:52.880 --> 0:00:55.800
<v Speaker 1>from our own Ryan the Stellica and subrot Pat Nike,

0:00:56.400 --> 0:00:58.440
<v Speaker 1>all about the chips supply chain. We've talked so much

0:00:58.480 --> 0:01:01.320
<v Speaker 1>about it Carol and over the US two years, how

0:01:01.400 --> 0:01:04.800
<v Speaker 1>it has been really challenged, not just for automakers but

0:01:04.920 --> 0:01:08.160
<v Speaker 1>for anyone who wanted a chip. It's actually getting harder

0:01:08.200 --> 0:01:11.679
<v Speaker 1>to trade because not all chips are created equal. Ryan

0:01:11.760 --> 0:01:14.400
<v Speaker 1>the Stelica is equities reporter for Bloomberg News, and he

0:01:14.440 --> 0:01:17.000
<v Speaker 1>joins us on the phone from Chicago. Ryan, great to

0:01:17.040 --> 0:01:18.240
<v Speaker 1>have you with us. I want to go back to

0:01:18.280 --> 0:01:20.040
<v Speaker 1>this idea that that not all chips are the same

0:01:20.080 --> 0:01:22.600
<v Speaker 1>here because we are starting to see a glut in

0:01:22.760 --> 0:01:25.720
<v Speaker 1>some types of chips, but others are still hard to

0:01:25.760 --> 0:01:29.640
<v Speaker 1>come by. Please explain. Yeah, absolutely, Well, Obviously, different chips

0:01:29.640 --> 0:01:31.800
<v Speaker 1>are used in different types of product categories, and we

0:01:31.840 --> 0:01:35.479
<v Speaker 1>are seeing differences in demand and supply depending on what

0:01:35.600 --> 0:01:37.800
<v Speaker 1>level you're looking at and what's part of the market

0:01:37.800 --> 0:01:40.120
<v Speaker 1>and what their use case is. So last week we

0:01:40.160 --> 0:01:42.800
<v Speaker 1>had a little bit of a warning sign out of Micron,

0:01:42.959 --> 0:01:47.240
<v Speaker 1>which talked about flowing demand for issues like computers and smartphones,

0:01:47.280 --> 0:01:50.680
<v Speaker 1>suggesting maybe a little bit of a weaker demand outlook

0:01:50.680 --> 0:01:53.680
<v Speaker 1>for memory related chips in particular. Now you mentioned before,

0:01:53.720 --> 0:01:56.240
<v Speaker 1>we just had sam some come out better than expect

0:01:56.240 --> 0:01:58.400
<v Speaker 1>to jump in revenue. So that's a positive sign for

0:01:58.440 --> 0:02:00.680
<v Speaker 1>this group. So again, some mix mills there, but this

0:02:00.720 --> 0:02:02.520
<v Speaker 1>is an area where people are still trying to suck

0:02:02.560 --> 0:02:04.480
<v Speaker 1>out what does demand look like and so on and

0:02:04.520 --> 0:02:06.920
<v Speaker 1>so forth. Of course, there are other areas that we

0:02:06.960 --> 0:02:09.120
<v Speaker 1>can get into this. Well. I feel like a story

0:02:09.160 --> 0:02:11.120
<v Speaker 1>like yours, Ryan is one that really kind of educates

0:02:11.160 --> 0:02:12.960
<v Speaker 1>us because it reminds us that not all chips are

0:02:13.000 --> 0:02:15.680
<v Speaker 1>the same. And then it also reminds us that this

0:02:15.720 --> 0:02:18.399
<v Speaker 1>is when it really turns out that if you're a

0:02:18.440 --> 0:02:21.959
<v Speaker 1>big buyer of chips, thank you, Apple, you tend to

0:02:21.960 --> 0:02:23.560
<v Speaker 1>be in a better position. So talk to us a

0:02:23.560 --> 0:02:26.320
<v Speaker 1>little bit about kind of the specifics the nuances of

0:02:26.320 --> 0:02:29.840
<v Speaker 1>the semi trade. Yeah, well sure, I mean you mentioned

0:02:29.840 --> 0:02:33.120
<v Speaker 1>that Apple is a huge buyer of chips, especially from

0:02:33.200 --> 0:02:35.480
<v Speaker 1>Micron and from Qualcom and from other names like that.

0:02:36.200 --> 0:02:38.320
<v Speaker 1>Because of, you know, the weight it throws around, it

0:02:38.320 --> 0:02:40.240
<v Speaker 1>has been able to navigate some of these supply chain

0:02:40.280 --> 0:02:42.840
<v Speaker 1>issues a little bit better than a smaller players, although

0:02:42.840 --> 0:02:44.880
<v Speaker 1>and it's most recent quarterly reported did kind of come

0:02:44.919 --> 0:02:47.079
<v Speaker 1>out and suggested it was seeing a certain amount of

0:02:47.120 --> 0:02:50.040
<v Speaker 1>headwind from this. Of course, now there's questions about demand

0:02:50.040 --> 0:02:52.440
<v Speaker 1>and in its ability to continue getting supply, so again

0:02:52.680 --> 0:02:57.120
<v Speaker 1>very complicated picture in the chip sector. UM, different areas

0:02:57.160 --> 0:02:59.840
<v Speaker 1>are seeing perhaps some stronger tail winds than others right now.

0:03:00.080 --> 0:03:02.880
<v Speaker 1>It depends on what the use cases. Okay, Ryan, let's

0:03:02.880 --> 0:03:05.560
<v Speaker 1>talk autos here. Help us get an understanding for what's

0:03:05.600 --> 0:03:07.919
<v Speaker 1>going on in the car industry, specifically here in the

0:03:08.040 --> 0:03:10.120
<v Speaker 1>United States, because it's still pretty tough to get a

0:03:10.120 --> 0:03:13.400
<v Speaker 1>new car. Yeah. Absolutely. We just saw a GM come

0:03:13.440 --> 0:03:15.560
<v Speaker 1>out last week talking about chip shortages and being sort

0:03:15.560 --> 0:03:17.240
<v Speaker 1>of an issue that if spacing. So that is an

0:03:17.280 --> 0:03:20.320
<v Speaker 1>area where they're continue to be extremely strong demand for chips,

0:03:20.360 --> 0:03:22.640
<v Speaker 1>and there's more and more chips are being put into cars,

0:03:22.720 --> 0:03:25.919
<v Speaker 1>especially electric vehicles, to unitor all the different kinds of

0:03:25.919 --> 0:03:29.760
<v Speaker 1>computers and UM you know, you know, everything that goes

0:03:29.760 --> 0:03:31.639
<v Speaker 1>on to those cousins to make sure that they're operating

0:03:31.639 --> 0:03:34.400
<v Speaker 1>and finding all the necessary data they need. So that

0:03:34.480 --> 0:03:36.680
<v Speaker 1>is an area that continues to see very strong demands.

0:03:37.000 --> 0:03:40.640
<v Speaker 1>UM and TATA companies, UM, you know, like Texas Instruments

0:03:40.680 --> 0:03:44.400
<v Speaker 1>STM UM finding on NXB UM food companies like that

0:03:44.400 --> 0:03:47.040
<v Speaker 1>are heavily involved in this particular area. All right, So

0:03:47.120 --> 0:03:50.000
<v Speaker 1>you've got you know, you talk about the different ships

0:03:50.000 --> 0:03:52.760
<v Speaker 1>in your story. You know, smartphones tablets, computers. We just

0:03:52.760 --> 0:03:55.440
<v Speaker 1>talked about auto Tim brought that up. There's data centers,

0:03:55.480 --> 0:03:59.640
<v Speaker 1>there's um AI artificial intelligence, and then you've also got

0:03:59.640 --> 0:04:01.640
<v Speaker 1>the chip eqipment makers. I almost think about when I'm

0:04:01.640 --> 0:04:04.400
<v Speaker 1>reading this story. I think about the energy sector. Right,

0:04:04.400 --> 0:04:06.720
<v Speaker 1>You've got integrated oil companies, You've got the e m P,

0:04:06.960 --> 0:04:10.320
<v Speaker 1>the exploration production companies, You've get utilities. Like there's different

0:04:10.320 --> 0:04:12.720
<v Speaker 1>ways of playing with it. Talk to us about like

0:04:12.760 --> 0:04:15.320
<v Speaker 1>the data center and AI guys or the chip equipment makers.

0:04:15.680 --> 0:04:20.159
<v Speaker 1>Is that opportunity for investors potentially well? Data center is

0:04:20.160 --> 0:04:22.520
<v Speaker 1>an area that so far seems to be holding up

0:04:22.520 --> 0:04:24.880
<v Speaker 1>pretty well. Data centers of course us in cloud computing

0:04:24.880 --> 0:04:29.039
<v Speaker 1>and so forth. So what has really major enterprise spending

0:04:29.080 --> 0:04:33.040
<v Speaker 1>behind it, especially named like Amazon and Microsoft and Alphabet

0:04:33.120 --> 0:04:35.320
<v Speaker 1>or of course the biggest players within the cloud space.

0:04:35.640 --> 0:04:37.840
<v Speaker 1>So companies like the media tend to see a lot

0:04:37.839 --> 0:04:39.680
<v Speaker 1>of demands for these types of products. A and B

0:04:39.920 --> 0:04:42.920
<v Speaker 1>is another one. Even Micron does have a data center division,

0:04:42.960 --> 0:04:45.320
<v Speaker 1>which it said was holding up pretty well in contrast

0:04:45.320 --> 0:04:48.160
<v Speaker 1>to the consumer side of things. So this is an area, um,

0:04:48.279 --> 0:04:50.320
<v Speaker 1>you know so far as holding well. People I've spoken

0:04:50.360 --> 0:04:53.640
<v Speaker 1>to said, um, they're really waiting to see whether this

0:04:53.760 --> 0:04:56.080
<v Speaker 1>continues to hold up. If it doesn't, then that does

0:04:56.160 --> 0:05:01.159
<v Speaker 1>have some pretty negative implications for what broader economic looks like. Yeah,

0:05:01.200 --> 0:05:02.760
<v Speaker 1>I feel like Tim, these are things like the hedge

0:05:02.760 --> 0:05:04.840
<v Speaker 1>fund guys right there watching like all these different kind

0:05:04.880 --> 0:05:08.440
<v Speaker 1>of indicators to give an idea of what comes next exactly.

0:05:08.480 --> 0:05:10.200
<v Speaker 1>And it's interesting to see. Two, we didn't even get

0:05:10.200 --> 0:05:12.440
<v Speaker 1>a chance to talk about crypto and the declining interest

0:05:12.480 --> 0:05:15.240
<v Speaker 1>around crypto, the decline price around crypto. That has an

0:05:15.240 --> 0:05:17.400
<v Speaker 1>effect on the chip industry as well, because that decreases

0:05:17.440 --> 0:05:19.080
<v Speaker 1>demand too. Do you know the sucks is up within

0:05:19.160 --> 0:05:22.039
<v Speaker 1>six percent since last Friday. I didn't know that I

0:05:22.080 --> 0:05:23.680
<v Speaker 1>was gonna I'll find that out at three o'clock at

0:05:23.720 --> 0:05:30.000
<v Speaker 1>that maybe maybe maybe a good one might pay a

0:05:30.000 --> 0:05:33.479
<v Speaker 1>good sector for the top of that three pm. Simcast Um, Ryan,

0:05:33.480 --> 0:05:36.080
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much, Ryan Pastelica. He's equities reporter at

0:05:36.120 --> 0:05:39.400
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg News. Joining us on the phone from Chicago. You're

0:05:39.440 --> 0:05:43.440
<v Speaker 1>listening to Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Masser and Bloomberg

0:05:43.480 --> 0:05:48.440
<v Speaker 1>Quick Takes Tim Stinovic on Bloomberg Radio Demand Destruction anyone,

0:05:48.560 --> 0:05:51.480
<v Speaker 1>Because this story is definitely a sign of the times,

0:05:51.480 --> 0:05:54.279
<v Speaker 1>as searching power bills are forcing the U. S. Industrial

0:05:54.320 --> 0:05:56.680
<v Speaker 1>complex to slow down. Tim This is a story you

0:05:56.720 --> 0:05:59.440
<v Speaker 1>will find on the Bloomberg Terminal online at Bloomberg dot

0:05:59.480 --> 0:06:02.640
<v Speaker 1>com slash business Week. It really just speaks to so

0:06:02.720 --> 0:06:04.040
<v Speaker 1>much of what's going on, and I feel like what

0:06:04.080 --> 0:06:06.320
<v Speaker 1>we just talked about for some of our audience, high

0:06:06.440 --> 0:06:10.719
<v Speaker 1>energy prices the bane of industrial production. Joe Do writes

0:06:10.760 --> 0:06:13.200
<v Speaker 1>all about it, along with Narraine Mallet Carroll. As you mentioned,

0:06:13.600 --> 0:06:15.560
<v Speaker 1>you can find this story at Bloomberg dot com slash

0:06:15.560 --> 0:06:19.600
<v Speaker 1>business Week. Joe Do is Medals and Agriculture Agriculture America's

0:06:19.600 --> 0:06:23.000
<v Speaker 1>deputy team leader for Bloomberg News. He joins us this afternoon,

0:06:23.000 --> 0:06:25.200
<v Speaker 1>also with us as Joel Webber, the editor of Bloomberg

0:06:25.240 --> 0:06:28.200
<v Speaker 1>Business Week. He's with us in the Bloomberg Interactive Brokers studio.

0:06:28.560 --> 0:06:31.640
<v Speaker 1>This is remarkable, remarkable, Joel. At one plant here in

0:06:31.640 --> 0:06:35.640
<v Speaker 1>the US, the electricity bills have tripled in recent months

0:06:35.680 --> 0:06:37.880
<v Speaker 1>and as a result, they've had to idle the plant

0:06:38.680 --> 0:06:42.040
<v Speaker 1>and more than one plant. Um. This is gonna have

0:06:42.320 --> 0:06:43.840
<v Speaker 1>um and this is gonna be a story that I

0:06:43.880 --> 0:06:45.360
<v Speaker 1>think we're going to continue to talk about. I mean,

0:06:45.400 --> 0:06:48.080
<v Speaker 1>look like the world is obsessed with the energy story

0:06:48.240 --> 0:06:53.040
<v Speaker 1>right now, we've seen it um just kind of devastate Europe.

0:06:53.200 --> 0:06:56.560
<v Speaker 1>And what really got us interested in this story by

0:06:56.720 --> 0:06:59.239
<v Speaker 1>by Joe and Noreen was that some of these early

0:06:59.320 --> 0:07:02.080
<v Speaker 1>signs are starting to show up here, that the surging

0:07:02.160 --> 0:07:07.520
<v Speaker 1>costs of electricity are gonna kind of break America's industrial

0:07:07.920 --> 0:07:13.200
<v Speaker 1>complex and that that factory might that makes America hum um. So, so, Joe,

0:07:13.200 --> 0:07:15.280
<v Speaker 1>what are we wrestling with here and what are those

0:07:15.800 --> 0:07:20.640
<v Speaker 1>factories and manufacturers looking at. Yeah, I think it's the

0:07:20.680 --> 0:07:25.920
<v Speaker 1>first time the United States is seeing a power crunch itself, right. Uh.

0:07:26.040 --> 0:07:30.440
<v Speaker 1>Europe obviously hit very early on with Russia's invasion of

0:07:30.520 --> 0:07:33.640
<v Speaker 1>Ukraine and then this spread into Asia. And for months now,

0:07:33.840 --> 0:07:37.640
<v Speaker 1>our European colleagues have been calling us on the commodities

0:07:37.680 --> 0:07:40.160
<v Speaker 1>desk here in the United States saying, aren't you guys

0:07:40.160 --> 0:07:43.240
<v Speaker 1>seeing similar problems for your steel mills and for your

0:07:43.280 --> 0:07:46.800
<v Speaker 1>aluminum mills and all the other manufacturing facilities, And kept saying, no,

0:07:46.920 --> 0:07:50.960
<v Speaker 1>it's just not happening. Well, when Century Aluminum, which is

0:07:51.000 --> 0:07:54.040
<v Speaker 1>the second largest US aluminum producer in the United States,

0:07:54.080 --> 0:07:55.920
<v Speaker 1>just a few weeks ago, announced that they were closing

0:07:55.920 --> 0:08:00.040
<v Speaker 1>down their largest facility due to power costs nor In

0:08:00.120 --> 0:08:01.920
<v Speaker 1>and I got on a call and said, what what

0:08:02.000 --> 0:08:04.080
<v Speaker 1>are we missing here? And and so this this is

0:08:04.160 --> 0:08:07.680
<v Speaker 1>ultimately what became this story. And she had been learning

0:08:08.000 --> 0:08:10.880
<v Speaker 1>already previously that a lot of manufacturers across the Midwest

0:08:10.920 --> 0:08:14.560
<v Speaker 1>were complaining about their power costs. They weren't shutting down necessarily,

0:08:14.760 --> 0:08:16.200
<v Speaker 1>but they were worried they were going to have to

0:08:16.400 --> 0:08:18.920
<v Speaker 1>throttle things back in the summer. And of course what

0:08:19.000 --> 0:08:21.760
<v Speaker 1>our story goes into is that not only are their

0:08:21.760 --> 0:08:24.480
<v Speaker 1>feeling these but they are actually you are starting to

0:08:24.480 --> 0:08:29.560
<v Speaker 1>see some some shuttering of of manufacturing production across the US,

0:08:29.600 --> 0:08:34.640
<v Speaker 1>including one source telling me that two finishing facilities UH

0:08:34.720 --> 0:08:38.440
<v Speaker 1>for steelmakers have already had to cut back on production

0:08:38.520 --> 0:08:41.960
<v Speaker 1>because they need to cut in some places so they

0:08:42.000 --> 0:08:45.640
<v Speaker 1>can continue to do, you know, their their main work. Joe.

0:08:45.640 --> 0:08:48.960
<v Speaker 1>What I love about your story is I learn about

0:08:49.040 --> 0:08:51.480
<v Speaker 1>within the industrial complex here in the United States kind

0:08:51.480 --> 0:08:53.720
<v Speaker 1>of how it all, how it all works, and especially

0:08:53.720 --> 0:08:57.640
<v Speaker 1>when you're you know, tapping into utilities and power, I

0:08:57.679 --> 0:09:01.080
<v Speaker 1>mean facilities, how have to pay for something as you

0:09:01.200 --> 0:09:03.880
<v Speaker 1>lay out something known as capacity. So in other words,

0:09:03.920 --> 0:09:06.640
<v Speaker 1>they kind of need to keep things functioning even if

0:09:06.720 --> 0:09:10.679
<v Speaker 1>they don't need to use it. Yeah, it's it's the

0:09:10.720 --> 0:09:13.280
<v Speaker 1>way we describe it is an insurance policy. So if

0:09:13.280 --> 0:09:16.960
<v Speaker 1>you're a big factory, or let's say you're you know,

0:09:17.000 --> 0:09:19.600
<v Speaker 1>you're a utility, right, and you need to make sure

0:09:19.600 --> 0:09:21.600
<v Speaker 1>that in the middle of August, the entire city of

0:09:21.760 --> 0:09:24.560
<v Speaker 1>New York has enough power to turn on all of

0:09:24.559 --> 0:09:29.160
<v Speaker 1>their air conditionings on a hundred degree humid day. Uh. Well,

0:09:29.840 --> 0:09:32.280
<v Speaker 1>you have to pay ahead of time to make sure

0:09:32.360 --> 0:09:36.280
<v Speaker 1>that capacity will be there if you need it. And

0:09:36.320 --> 0:09:39.720
<v Speaker 1>what we're finding because the grid ist aging, because we've

0:09:39.720 --> 0:09:43.679
<v Speaker 1>been phasing out old fossil fuel plants, you know, because

0:09:43.760 --> 0:09:46.880
<v Speaker 1>of the war between Russia and Ukraine, all of things,

0:09:47.080 --> 0:09:49.760
<v Speaker 1>things are converging in pushing up the cost even of

0:09:49.800 --> 0:09:53.040
<v Speaker 1>the capacity. So you combine the capacity, which is an

0:09:53.040 --> 0:09:56.000
<v Speaker 1>insurance that you sometimes need but sometimes you don't need,

0:09:56.360 --> 0:09:59.079
<v Speaker 1>and you add that with what you're actually paying uh

0:09:59.160 --> 0:10:03.280
<v Speaker 1>per kilowatta or and it's really just stressing these companies.

0:10:04.520 --> 0:10:08.120
<v Speaker 1>Um and And I'm curious here, Joe, like, well, when

0:10:08.160 --> 0:10:10.559
<v Speaker 1>where we gonna know how bad this gets? Like right,

0:10:10.679 --> 0:10:13.920
<v Speaker 1>we're early right now, right, Like how bad could this get?

0:10:15.559 --> 0:10:18.319
<v Speaker 1>So the forecast that we had pointed out which was

0:10:18.360 --> 0:10:21.520
<v Speaker 1>a government forecast, said the worst is yet to come,

0:10:21.520 --> 0:10:24.240
<v Speaker 1>and it's probably gonna come here in the third quarter,

0:10:24.960 --> 0:10:27.760
<v Speaker 1>towards the end of the summer, as obviously power use

0:10:27.800 --> 0:10:30.520
<v Speaker 1>goes up UM to its highs and it's going to

0:10:30.600 --> 0:10:33.400
<v Speaker 1>hit a high of all time. Um. You know. This

0:10:33.480 --> 0:10:36.320
<v Speaker 1>is something I was just discussing earlier with Limberg Television,

0:10:36.320 --> 0:10:38.559
<v Speaker 1>which is, well, what does that mean? Right? And I

0:10:38.600 --> 0:10:40.720
<v Speaker 1>think we're going to be paying very close attention to

0:10:40.800 --> 0:10:44.880
<v Speaker 1>earnings in the next coming weeks for the big manufacturing companies,

0:10:45.080 --> 0:10:48.240
<v Speaker 1>in which they'll tell us. You know, all they've said

0:10:48.240 --> 0:10:50.240
<v Speaker 1>all year is that demand is good in order books

0:10:50.440 --> 0:10:54.520
<v Speaker 1>remain healthy. Um. But we're actually starting to see economic

0:10:54.600 --> 0:10:56.640
<v Speaker 1>data show a bit of a slowdown in the economy.

0:10:56.640 --> 0:11:01.400
<v Speaker 1>Obviously GDP was negative um. And it's going to start

0:11:02.160 --> 0:11:04.600
<v Speaker 1>the question will come up from analysts, well what about

0:11:04.600 --> 0:11:07.480
<v Speaker 1>your power contracts? Are those starting to be a problem

0:11:07.520 --> 0:11:09.400
<v Speaker 1>for you? Does that mean you're gonna have to shut down?

0:11:09.800 --> 0:11:11.280
<v Speaker 1>And are you getting it on the other end, which

0:11:11.360 --> 0:11:14.360
<v Speaker 1>is demand? Uh. You know, listen, I'm not saying that

0:11:14.400 --> 0:11:17.560
<v Speaker 1>we're we're it's for sure, right, things could could turn

0:11:17.600 --> 0:11:21.240
<v Speaker 1>and maybe suddenly things improve, um, But right now, it's

0:11:21.280 --> 0:11:24.320
<v Speaker 1>like Noreene wrote in our story, Um, there's just not

0:11:24.440 --> 0:11:29.079
<v Speaker 1>enough renewables out there to offset what's going on right now,

0:11:29.120 --> 0:11:31.400
<v Speaker 1>and people are going to start feeling the pain. Well,

0:11:31.440 --> 0:11:33.880
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about some of those renewables here, because I

0:11:33.920 --> 0:11:35.960
<v Speaker 1>do like how the two of you wrote about a

0:11:35.960 --> 0:11:40.480
<v Speaker 1>potential silver lining here, the idea of investment perhaps in renewables,

0:11:40.600 --> 0:11:44.640
<v Speaker 1>barges full of batteries, startups getting investment as a result

0:11:44.679 --> 0:11:47.880
<v Speaker 1>of this. Help us find the silver lining here, Joe, Yeah,

0:11:47.960 --> 0:11:51.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean the silver lining is is that comes online. Um.

0:11:52.080 --> 0:11:53.920
<v Speaker 1>The bad part of the silver lining is it comes

0:11:53.920 --> 0:11:57.320
<v Speaker 1>in line over a number of years, and it's not

0:11:57.400 --> 0:11:59.760
<v Speaker 1>something that can just happen now. And I know we've

0:11:59.800 --> 0:12:03.080
<v Speaker 1>all and having this conversation this year, especially in Europe, right,

0:12:03.160 --> 0:12:08.880
<v Speaker 1>which is the short term pain. Suddenly everybody's looking back, Uh,

0:12:08.920 --> 0:12:12.440
<v Speaker 1>Suddenly everybody is looking back at uh fossil fuels. Right.

0:12:12.640 --> 0:12:16.640
<v Speaker 1>We need power now and um, and and that's the struggle.

0:12:16.720 --> 0:12:20.680
<v Speaker 1>So eventually we are going to get important solar coming online,

0:12:20.679 --> 0:12:23.160
<v Speaker 1>and we're gonna have important wind coming online, and these things,

0:12:24.160 --> 0:12:27.640
<v Speaker 1>included with the ability to store all of that power,

0:12:27.760 --> 0:12:30.080
<v Speaker 1>are really going to change the dynamics of the grid.

0:12:30.440 --> 0:12:32.720
<v Speaker 1>But at this moment, it's just not there. And and

0:12:32.720 --> 0:12:35.080
<v Speaker 1>that's why you're feeling this squeeze, right, and we're like

0:12:35.160 --> 0:12:37.760
<v Speaker 1>far from that. So look, if if this is going

0:12:37.800 --> 0:12:40.840
<v Speaker 1>to hit industry, Joe, like, what do we expect. Is

0:12:40.880 --> 0:12:43.920
<v Speaker 1>this is something that consumers are going to feel the

0:12:44.720 --> 0:12:47.600
<v Speaker 1>energy prices or are they gonna have the knock on

0:12:47.640 --> 0:12:50.760
<v Speaker 1>effects of suddenly like this becoming yet another thing that

0:12:50.840 --> 0:12:55.800
<v Speaker 1>plays into inflation and inflationary concerns? Yeah, I mean I'll

0:12:55.800 --> 0:12:58.080
<v Speaker 1>put it this way. They could feel it. Uh, you know,

0:12:58.200 --> 0:13:00.920
<v Speaker 1>you could see a pass through of cost, but that

0:13:00.960 --> 0:13:05.719
<v Speaker 1>won't happen if demand, uh suddenly dissipates even before then, right,

0:13:06.080 --> 0:13:08.959
<v Speaker 1>if you have real concerns of an already problematic issue

0:13:08.960 --> 0:13:14.360
<v Speaker 1>of inflation, you have the already problematic slowdown in the economy. Um, suddenly,

0:13:14.360 --> 0:13:18.640
<v Speaker 1>if that demand disappears, uh, you know, than than you know,

0:13:18.679 --> 0:13:22.720
<v Speaker 1>passing through those costs, maybe maybe isn't entirely possible and

0:13:22.720 --> 0:13:25.360
<v Speaker 1>and and maybe suddenly you're looking at cutting back on

0:13:26.320 --> 0:13:29.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot of manufacturing capacity. I mean, listen, this is

0:13:29.360 --> 0:13:32.199
<v Speaker 1>pure speculation, but I am kind of playing out the

0:13:32.200 --> 0:13:35.280
<v Speaker 1>potential possibilities here well, and it certainly seems to start,

0:13:35.400 --> 0:13:37.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, fitting in with some of the other economic

0:13:37.320 --> 0:13:39.760
<v Speaker 1>data points that we're starting to get about the global economy,

0:13:39.800 --> 0:13:42.400
<v Speaker 1>certainly in the US economy. Um, Joe do, Thank you

0:13:42.440 --> 0:13:45.480
<v Speaker 1>so much. Medals and Agriculture America's deputy team leader at

0:13:45.520 --> 0:13:48.600
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg News, along with Joel Webber, the editor of Bloomberg

0:13:48.640 --> 0:13:51.320
<v Speaker 1>Business Week. This story you can find on the Bloomberg

0:13:51.400 --> 0:13:55.960
<v Speaker 1>and at Bloomberg dot com slash business Week. This is

0:13:56.000 --> 0:13:59.920
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Masser and Bloomberg Quick Takes.

0:14:00.080 --> 0:14:04.280
<v Speaker 1>Tim Stinovic on Bloomberg Radio. Alright, full disclosure, I didn't

0:14:04.280 --> 0:14:05.719
<v Speaker 1>do a lot of reading while I was sick out

0:14:05.760 --> 0:14:08.959
<v Speaker 1>with COVID. To be quite honest, I did periodically say, Hey, Google,

0:14:09.000 --> 0:14:12.040
<v Speaker 1>give me a news update. And when I did yesterday,

0:14:12.120 --> 0:14:14.400
<v Speaker 1>that's when I heard about Amazon and Grubhub teaming up.

0:14:14.920 --> 0:14:16.400
<v Speaker 1>I kind of say that, Tim, We're still trying to

0:14:16.400 --> 0:14:19.200
<v Speaker 1>figure out, you know, what this relationship does and means,

0:14:19.320 --> 0:14:22.200
<v Speaker 1>and can New Yorkers actually get it. Grubhub and seamless

0:14:22.200 --> 0:14:25.040
<v Speaker 1>are the same company, but it can't get it on seamless.

0:14:25.120 --> 0:14:27.480
<v Speaker 1>You know, We're we're trying to figure out what's going on. Fortunately,

0:14:27.520 --> 0:14:29.120
<v Speaker 1>We've got a great person to help us do that.

0:14:29.200 --> 0:14:32.560
<v Speaker 1>Jackie Devlos, this technology reporter for Bloomberg News. She's with

0:14:32.640 --> 0:14:35.200
<v Speaker 1>us right now in the Bloomberg Interactive Broker studio. So

0:14:35.280 --> 0:14:37.160
<v Speaker 1>this is a great Day two story, Jackie, because I

0:14:37.160 --> 0:14:38.880
<v Speaker 1>think a lot of people who are paying attention yesterday

0:14:39.000 --> 0:14:43.520
<v Speaker 1>understand the news, uh that grub Hub and Amazon half

0:14:43.520 --> 0:14:46.480
<v Speaker 1>teamed up for Amazon Prime customers to get what free

0:14:46.520 --> 0:14:50.440
<v Speaker 1>Grubhub delivery. Absolutely, at the end of the day for customers,

0:14:50.560 --> 0:14:55.280
<v Speaker 1>this is a much better deal. Prime has a really impressive,

0:14:55.360 --> 0:14:58.840
<v Speaker 1>very loyal membership base of Prime subscribers. I mean you

0:14:58.840 --> 0:15:01.960
<v Speaker 1>can get your shampo toilet paper, and now you can

0:15:02.000 --> 0:15:05.480
<v Speaker 1>get your dinner delivered. So um. At a time where

0:15:05.600 --> 0:15:08.520
<v Speaker 1>people are really pinching pennies, you don't want to have

0:15:08.600 --> 0:15:12.040
<v Speaker 1>to be paying you know, fee after fee tips, and

0:15:12.080 --> 0:15:13.720
<v Speaker 1>so this is just a good way to clean it

0:15:13.840 --> 0:15:16.200
<v Speaker 1>up and provide a deal to their customers. Okay, So

0:15:16.280 --> 0:15:19.520
<v Speaker 1>what's in it for Grubhub and for Amazon, Well, this

0:15:19.640 --> 0:15:22.120
<v Speaker 1>is an especially good deal for grub Hub. They have

0:15:22.160 --> 0:15:26.240
<v Speaker 1>been needing a lifeline of sorts. Um. If you remember,

0:15:26.240 --> 0:15:28.440
<v Speaker 1>at the beginning of the pandemic, they lost a ton

0:15:28.520 --> 0:15:31.160
<v Speaker 1>of market share to door Dash and Uber eats, and

0:15:31.600 --> 0:15:34.040
<v Speaker 1>especially in their top markets like New York and Chicago.

0:15:34.360 --> 0:15:36.480
<v Speaker 1>So they've really been looking for ways to kind of

0:15:36.520 --> 0:15:38.960
<v Speaker 1>get some of those customers back and keep them on.

0:15:39.520 --> 0:15:42.440
<v Speaker 1>And they've still been struggling. Their pairing company has been

0:15:42.440 --> 0:15:45.040
<v Speaker 1>looking to sell them, and no one, no one's really

0:15:45.240 --> 0:15:48.320
<v Speaker 1>up for the buy right now. And so this is

0:15:48.360 --> 0:15:50.960
<v Speaker 1>not only a good way to kind of really boost

0:15:51.000 --> 0:15:54.200
<v Speaker 1>that user base again, but also make them a more

0:15:54.240 --> 0:15:58.840
<v Speaker 1>attractive acquisition target for other companies. Scrubhub is like I

0:15:58.920 --> 0:16:02.440
<v Speaker 1>finally got a day, Thank God for the big dance. Um,

0:16:02.520 --> 0:16:03.880
<v Speaker 1>So there's a little bit of that going on. But

0:16:03.920 --> 0:16:06.400
<v Speaker 1>I also feel like for Amazon, man, they are thinking

0:16:06.640 --> 0:16:09.200
<v Speaker 1>so much about how to hold onto all of us

0:16:09.480 --> 0:16:12.280
<v Speaker 1>who are part of the Amazon Prime deal. Absolutely, and

0:16:12.560 --> 0:16:15.160
<v Speaker 1>you know a lot of us forget that they actually

0:16:15.280 --> 0:16:18.720
<v Speaker 1>did wait into the food delivery industry a while as

0:16:19.400 --> 0:16:23.120
<v Speaker 1>it didn't unfortunately it was back in and you know

0:16:23.160 --> 0:16:26.560
<v Speaker 1>it's called Amazon Restaurants, and you know, Jeff Bezos himself

0:16:26.840 --> 0:16:29.720
<v Speaker 1>was really reticent to get into the space because if

0:16:29.760 --> 0:16:32.240
<v Speaker 1>you think about it, the moment hot meal gets to

0:16:32.280 --> 0:16:34.720
<v Speaker 1>your door, it's a toss up. It could be perfect

0:16:34.880 --> 0:16:37.400
<v Speaker 1>or you know, if you order sushi on the wrong day,

0:16:37.800 --> 0:16:42.760
<v Speaker 1>it could really just ruin that Prime experience for Prime subscribers.

0:16:42.800 --> 0:16:45.600
<v Speaker 1>And so he didn't invest a lot into it, and um,

0:16:45.600 --> 0:16:47.200
<v Speaker 1>it kind of folded. And so this is kind of

0:16:47.200 --> 0:16:49.280
<v Speaker 1>a way of inching back into the space for sure.

0:16:49.360 --> 0:16:51.200
<v Speaker 1>So for Amazon it's kind of like, yeah, I'm gonna

0:16:51.280 --> 0:16:52.640
<v Speaker 1>date you a little bit, but I've got to back

0:16:52.720 --> 0:16:55.240
<v Speaker 1>up or I can back at it anymore. I mean,

0:16:55.280 --> 0:16:57.880
<v Speaker 1>it just feels like, because having been homesick, I did

0:16:57.880 --> 0:17:00.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot of ordering of food, and man, so many

0:17:00.080 --> 0:17:02.600
<v Speaker 1>times things are messed up. Oh yeah, And you know,

0:17:03.080 --> 0:17:07.760
<v Speaker 1>it's pretty interesting how they structured this partnership. They didn't

0:17:07.800 --> 0:17:11.719
<v Speaker 1>exactly take a stake out right. It's an initial option

0:17:11.760 --> 0:17:14.840
<v Speaker 1>to do so through warrants um and then they can

0:17:15.240 --> 0:17:18.840
<v Speaker 1>increase that up for up to fifteen percent if things

0:17:18.880 --> 0:17:22.000
<v Speaker 1>go well. So it's you know, a lot of protection

0:17:22.000 --> 0:17:24.880
<v Speaker 1>and it's a cautious move in. But absolutely for us

0:17:24.880 --> 0:17:26.680
<v Speaker 1>that you know, are so used to going on door dash,

0:17:26.840 --> 0:17:29.760
<v Speaker 1>Uber Eats and rapid delivery, now it's just going to

0:17:29.800 --> 0:17:33.919
<v Speaker 1>bring that you know, fee notch down a notch a bit. Okay,

0:17:33.960 --> 0:17:36.800
<v Speaker 1>So what does this mean for Amazon Prime customers who

0:17:36.840 --> 0:17:39.719
<v Speaker 1>are getting a price hyke up to a hundred dollars

0:17:39.720 --> 0:17:41.680
<v Speaker 1>a year at a time when, in your own words,

0:17:41.760 --> 0:17:45.240
<v Speaker 1>Jackie customers are pinching pennies because everything is more expensive

0:17:45.359 --> 0:17:48.639
<v Speaker 1>right now? Does this make that Amazon Prime subscription that

0:17:48.720 --> 0:17:53.600
<v Speaker 1>much more valuable and somebody less likely to cut their

0:17:53.600 --> 0:17:56.720
<v Speaker 1>Prime sub I think overwhelming yes, because when you think

0:17:57.240 --> 0:18:01.119
<v Speaker 1>about how much that grubhub last membership is worth, you

0:18:01.160 --> 0:18:04.320
<v Speaker 1>don't just get free delivery, you get um a slew

0:18:04.320 --> 0:18:08.320
<v Speaker 1>of other perks and deals, and um that's worth a

0:18:08.359 --> 0:18:11.199
<v Speaker 1>month that pays for itself if you order, you know,

0:18:11.240 --> 0:18:13.800
<v Speaker 1>at least three to four times a week, which many

0:18:13.800 --> 0:18:17.760
<v Speaker 1>people do. And so for Prime subscribers that have already

0:18:17.760 --> 0:18:20.520
<v Speaker 1>dealt with this Prime increase, this is just an added

0:18:20.560 --> 0:18:23.520
<v Speaker 1>bonus and you know, just a free perk for a

0:18:23.560 --> 0:18:26.000
<v Speaker 1>service that many of us use. So doesn't mean for

0:18:26.000 --> 0:18:28.600
<v Speaker 1>the other food services. Have you been thinking about, you know,

0:18:28.640 --> 0:18:30.760
<v Speaker 1>what does this mean for other players, either in big

0:18:30.760 --> 0:18:33.480
<v Speaker 1>tech or or other world. I don't know that Amazon

0:18:33.560 --> 0:18:36.560
<v Speaker 1>competes with or just the other food delivery services or

0:18:36.600 --> 0:18:39.080
<v Speaker 1>they kind of need to be thinking about maybe hooking

0:18:39.119 --> 0:18:41.600
<v Speaker 1>up with someone. I have to it up to the

0:18:41.640 --> 0:18:45.960
<v Speaker 1>anti a bit, because I think many had thought that

0:18:46.040 --> 0:18:48.639
<v Speaker 1>grub hub was just kind of a dead asset at

0:18:48.680 --> 0:18:52.240
<v Speaker 1>this point, and given they've lost so much market share,

0:18:52.480 --> 0:18:54.159
<v Speaker 1>this kind of puts them back in the game in

0:18:54.160 --> 0:18:56.800
<v Speaker 1>a way. And you know, you saw it indoor Dash

0:18:56.800 --> 0:19:00.040
<v Speaker 1>and Uber stock price yesterday. They were under pressure a

0:19:00.040 --> 0:19:02.560
<v Speaker 1>bit because you know, if you're going to have a partner,

0:19:02.600 --> 0:19:07.440
<v Speaker 1>you wanted to be a logistics giant like Amazon. Interesting,

0:19:07.440 --> 0:19:09.240
<v Speaker 1>and I wonder about the logistics part of this, because

0:19:09.280 --> 0:19:12.000
<v Speaker 1>Amazon does have that part figured out, But delivering food

0:19:12.080 --> 0:19:14.720
<v Speaker 1>is tough. Margins are really tight, and there is a

0:19:14.760 --> 0:19:17.240
<v Speaker 1>lot of competition. Jackie, just in the last thirty seconds,

0:19:17.240 --> 0:19:20.040
<v Speaker 1>does this tell us anything about what Amazon's ambitions are

0:19:20.040 --> 0:19:23.040
<v Speaker 1>not for food delivery, but for last mile area that

0:19:23.080 --> 0:19:25.920
<v Speaker 1>it really has covered. I think it means that they're

0:19:25.960 --> 0:19:30.760
<v Speaker 1>looking to um get into a space that has had

0:19:31.320 --> 0:19:34.160
<v Speaker 1>a tough time figuring out how to make the economics work.

0:19:34.200 --> 0:19:36.840
<v Speaker 1>And they already have a really big network of drivers,

0:19:36.880 --> 0:19:39.920
<v Speaker 1>and so expanding into something like this um can only help,

0:19:40.000 --> 0:19:42.320
<v Speaker 1>especially as they're looking to tap other areas of growth.

0:19:43.200 --> 0:19:45.000
<v Speaker 1>So I'm going to order like my paper towels and

0:19:45.000 --> 0:19:47.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to get like a salad al with it.

0:19:49.520 --> 0:19:53.000
<v Speaker 1>Oh my god, it's just Amazon taking over the world. Anyway,

0:19:53.000 --> 0:19:55.199
<v Speaker 1>It's really kind of cool to see how this is

0:19:55.200 --> 0:19:58.919
<v Speaker 1>all evolving. Jackie Devola's technology reporter at Bloomberg News back

0:19:58.920 --> 0:20:01.600
<v Speaker 1>in our interactive Brokers studio. I don't know, Tim, what

0:20:01.640 --> 0:20:03.960
<v Speaker 1>do you think? Look it makes sense. A question that

0:20:04.040 --> 0:20:05.679
<v Speaker 1>I have just over and over again is what this

0:20:05.720 --> 0:20:09.080
<v Speaker 1>means for Seamless, which is a grubhub company. Yeah, because

0:20:09.080 --> 0:20:11.199
<v Speaker 1>that's what we use here in New York. So is

0:20:11.200 --> 0:20:13.199
<v Speaker 1>it couldn't work here? I'll have to try it out

0:20:13.200 --> 0:20:17.000
<v Speaker 1>because I'm a Surprime sub driver exactly. All right, you're

0:20:17.040 --> 0:20:26.719
<v Speaker 1>listening to Bloomberg I'm bro journal. Yeah, but you let

0:20:26.720 --> 0:20:31.639
<v Speaker 1>me drive? Oh no, no, no no, no, please, I'll do

0:20:33.880 --> 0:20:42.199
<v Speaker 1>I want to drive. It's a good question. This is

0:20:42.240 --> 0:20:48.320
<v Speaker 1>the drive to the clothes on Bloomberg Radio. All right,

0:20:48.320 --> 0:20:50.120
<v Speaker 1>We've got just about ten and a half minutes left

0:20:50.200 --> 0:20:53.160
<v Speaker 1>in the Thursday trade Carl Master along with Tim Stanevik

0:20:53.240 --> 0:20:55.000
<v Speaker 1>right here on Bloomberg Business Week and Tim, we've got

0:20:55.040 --> 0:20:58.680
<v Speaker 1>stocks up, bonds down, yields moving up. I'm trying to

0:20:58.720 --> 0:21:00.399
<v Speaker 1>figure out which trade do I try? I mean that

0:21:00.440 --> 0:21:02.760
<v Speaker 1>sounds about right right. If stocks go up bonds typically

0:21:02.800 --> 0:21:05.080
<v Speaker 1>go down, but I'm trying to figure out which one

0:21:05.600 --> 0:21:08.480
<v Speaker 1>really hasn't right. Maybe Brad McMillan has the answer for you.

0:21:08.920 --> 0:21:11.280
<v Speaker 1>He's joining us now, his chief investment officer at Commonwealth

0:21:11.320 --> 0:21:15.040
<v Speaker 1>Financial Network. Brad joining us on the phone from Waltham, Massachusetts.

0:21:15.280 --> 0:21:19.160
<v Speaker 1>Commonwealth has got approximately two two point five billion dollars

0:21:19.160 --> 0:21:23.160
<v Speaker 1>in assets under management. Brad, how are you? I'm doing great.

0:21:23.200 --> 0:21:25.040
<v Speaker 1>I hope you guys are having a good summer too.

0:21:25.280 --> 0:21:28.200
<v Speaker 1>We are, we are well, We're not, No, we're not,

0:21:28.320 --> 0:21:30.680
<v Speaker 1>because we both are dealing with COVID issues, but we are.

0:21:30.960 --> 0:21:33.320
<v Speaker 1>We are healthy, Our families are healthy, and that's that's

0:21:33.359 --> 0:21:35.879
<v Speaker 1>certainly what's important here, Brad. But you know, you you

0:21:36.240 --> 0:21:38.040
<v Speaker 1>ask and you get the answer you might not want

0:21:38.040 --> 0:21:41.320
<v Speaker 1>with us. Okay, that's that's the thing here. Let's talk markets,

0:21:41.560 --> 0:21:44.520
<v Speaker 1>um help. He'll bring us up to speed about what

0:21:44.560 --> 0:21:46.359
<v Speaker 1>you're seeing, not just in the trade today, but the

0:21:46.359 --> 0:21:48.680
<v Speaker 1>recent trend that we're seeing. And I'll ask you the

0:21:48.760 --> 0:21:51.040
<v Speaker 1>question that I ask everyone, is the worst behind us?

0:21:52.280 --> 0:21:54.320
<v Speaker 1>I think the worst is behind us for a couple

0:21:54.359 --> 0:21:57.159
<v Speaker 1>of reasons. First of all, when you look at everything

0:21:57.200 --> 0:21:59.919
<v Speaker 1>that's been driving this, you know it's it's really been

0:22:00.000 --> 0:22:05.200
<v Speaker 1>about interest rates so far, and you know, inflation is

0:22:05.840 --> 0:22:09.159
<v Speaker 1>starting to top out. We're seeing commodities start to pull back,

0:22:09.520 --> 0:22:13.560
<v Speaker 1>We're seeing supply chains normalize. The FED has pretty much

0:22:13.600 --> 0:22:16.600
<v Speaker 1>been as hawks that can be, so fears are going

0:22:16.640 --> 0:22:19.480
<v Speaker 1>to go down, and when interest rates start to stabilize,

0:22:19.840 --> 0:22:22.359
<v Speaker 1>that gives us the ability to start moving ahead. And

0:22:22.359 --> 0:22:24.040
<v Speaker 1>I think that's where we are now. Most of the

0:22:24.080 --> 0:22:29.879
<v Speaker 1>damage has been done, okay, but the the impact of

0:22:29.880 --> 0:22:32.159
<v Speaker 1>that damage can stick around for a while, and that

0:22:32.240 --> 0:22:34.680
<v Speaker 1>has certainly been the case of higher inflation. So even

0:22:34.720 --> 0:22:37.720
<v Speaker 1>if we come down a bit, we're still at pretty higher,

0:22:38.040 --> 0:22:42.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, high levels, maybe not historically, but certainly high

0:22:42.359 --> 0:22:46.520
<v Speaker 1>compared to recent history. So that damage on the economy

0:22:46.720 --> 0:22:48.720
<v Speaker 1>as well as on the markets can stick around for

0:22:48.760 --> 0:22:52.120
<v Speaker 1>a while. Fair. I think that's fair, and I think

0:22:52.320 --> 0:22:55.280
<v Speaker 1>you're absolutely right, Carrol. That's what's dry. That's what drove

0:22:55.359 --> 0:22:58.280
<v Speaker 1>the market last month. It's more about are we going

0:22:58.320 --> 0:23:01.040
<v Speaker 1>to get a recession and what's that to do to earnings?

0:23:01.400 --> 0:23:04.240
<v Speaker 1>Then what our interest rates doing and what are we

0:23:04.480 --> 0:23:07.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, what does that mean for evaluations? That damage

0:23:07.240 --> 0:23:10.080
<v Speaker 1>is done, but I would argue the economy still has

0:23:10.119 --> 0:23:12.480
<v Speaker 1>a ton of momentum and a lot of that fear

0:23:12.560 --> 0:23:17.080
<v Speaker 1>is overdone. Where where are you seeing that momentum right now?

0:23:17.640 --> 0:23:20.159
<v Speaker 1>Because you know, we we just had this great story

0:23:20.600 --> 0:23:22.960
<v Speaker 1>from our own Joe Dough in Bloomberg Business. We're talking

0:23:22.960 --> 0:23:25.320
<v Speaker 1>about higher energy prices are actually leading to the closure

0:23:25.520 --> 0:23:28.720
<v Speaker 1>of some industrial firms because those those prices are have

0:23:28.800 --> 0:23:32.439
<v Speaker 1>tripled that they're paying. We see food costs coming up. Um,

0:23:32.440 --> 0:23:34.080
<v Speaker 1>tell me where you're seeing the bright spots right now?

0:23:34.200 --> 0:23:36.320
<v Speaker 1>And look, we know that consumers did a good job

0:23:36.359 --> 0:23:38.440
<v Speaker 1>saving during the pandemic, but they can only pay for

0:23:38.560 --> 0:23:42.520
<v Speaker 1>five dollar a gallon gas for so long. Absolutely true.

0:23:42.560 --> 0:23:44.960
<v Speaker 1>But the one, the one bright spot that we're looking

0:23:45.000 --> 0:23:47.679
<v Speaker 1>at here is employment. And yes, I know the job's

0:23:47.720 --> 0:23:50.040
<v Speaker 1>report is coming up. I get that. But if you

0:23:50.080 --> 0:23:52.240
<v Speaker 1>look at where we've been, we'd continue to add jobs

0:23:52.280 --> 0:23:55.080
<v Speaker 1>at about four thousand a month. That's about twice the

0:23:55.119 --> 0:23:59.080
<v Speaker 1>pace of what we were doing before the pandemic, and

0:23:59.119 --> 0:24:03.040
<v Speaker 1>we still have millions of jobs available. So you know,

0:24:03.119 --> 0:24:06.080
<v Speaker 1>we don't typically get a recession as long as people

0:24:06.200 --> 0:24:09.159
<v Speaker 1>are working and can work. And I think until we

0:24:09.200 --> 0:24:12.800
<v Speaker 1>see the employment market turnaround, I'm betting against a recession.

0:24:13.840 --> 0:24:16.000
<v Speaker 1>So what does that mean in terms of betting your

0:24:16.040 --> 0:24:19.520
<v Speaker 1>financial bets. What does that mean you're advising clients to

0:24:19.600 --> 0:24:22.520
<v Speaker 1>do or how are you putting, you know, their money

0:24:22.600 --> 0:24:26.480
<v Speaker 1>to worth well? Well, when you look at the markets,

0:24:26.520 --> 0:24:28.919
<v Speaker 1>I mean there's been a lot of fear about what

0:24:29.000 --> 0:24:33.160
<v Speaker 1>bonds have done. Okay, fair enough, we've seen an unprecedented

0:24:33.600 --> 0:24:36.080
<v Speaker 1>trade down in bonds. But why was that? That was

0:24:36.119 --> 0:24:39.240
<v Speaker 1>because interest rates moved up, and now seems to be

0:24:39.280 --> 0:24:43.000
<v Speaker 1>the interest rates are normalizing, So bonds, all of a sudden,

0:24:43.000 --> 0:24:45.400
<v Speaker 1>you're getting paid more than you've been paid the while

0:24:45.520 --> 0:24:48.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't I don't mind bonds at this point. When

0:24:48.160 --> 0:24:50.680
<v Speaker 1>you look at stocks, okay, stocks are now cheaper than

0:24:50.720 --> 0:24:53.959
<v Speaker 1>they've been in the past couple of years, and all

0:24:53.960 --> 0:24:56.560
<v Speaker 1>of a sudden, the you're earning yields of free cash

0:24:56.640 --> 0:25:01.120
<v Speaker 1>vote flow yields are competitive with what we're seeing in bonds.

0:25:01.600 --> 0:25:03.199
<v Speaker 1>In other words, I look at a market and I

0:25:03.280 --> 0:25:06.639
<v Speaker 1>see a normal market with some potential moving ahead. I

0:25:06.680 --> 0:25:10.199
<v Speaker 1>don't see a taking time bomb, which is what you

0:25:10.200 --> 0:25:14.080
<v Speaker 1>know a lot of the coverage is suggesting. Okay, so

0:25:14.160 --> 0:25:16.720
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about what you're going to start to see here.

0:25:16.760 --> 0:25:19.520
<v Speaker 1>Carol had the great question about you know where what

0:25:19.640 --> 0:25:22.200
<v Speaker 1>the what where to put money Right now, I want

0:25:22.200 --> 0:25:25.240
<v Speaker 1>to go back to your macro outlook, because you have

0:25:25.280 --> 0:25:27.400
<v Speaker 1>a really really it sounds like you're really optimistic. You're

0:25:27.440 --> 0:25:28.879
<v Speaker 1>much more optimistic than a lot of the people that

0:25:28.880 --> 0:25:31.400
<v Speaker 1>we've spoken to. But you're also speaking in a way

0:25:31.440 --> 0:25:33.520
<v Speaker 1>that a lot of our people who cover the FED

0:25:33.960 --> 0:25:37.439
<v Speaker 1>and cover economics, I think, which is with you know,

0:25:37.640 --> 0:25:39.800
<v Speaker 1>half a million people added to the payrolls every month

0:25:39.880 --> 0:25:41.840
<v Speaker 1>so far this year, it's hard to look like the

0:25:41.920 --> 0:25:43.960
<v Speaker 1>US is in a recession right now. When when do

0:25:44.040 --> 0:25:45.960
<v Speaker 1>you start to worry? Is it if we get a

0:25:46.000 --> 0:25:48.520
<v Speaker 1>softerwre than expected jobs report tomorrow or do do those

0:25:48.560 --> 0:25:51.840
<v Speaker 1>numbers have to start going negative each month? I think

0:25:51.880 --> 0:25:53.760
<v Speaker 1>if I'm going to be I'm going to continue to

0:25:53.800 --> 0:25:57.360
<v Speaker 1>be reasonably cheerful. As long as job growth stays about

0:25:57.359 --> 0:26:00.240
<v Speaker 1>two thousand a month, Okay, okay, As long is the

0:26:00.320 --> 0:26:03.480
<v Speaker 1>number of jobs out there available stay in the millions.

0:26:03.760 --> 0:26:07.120
<v Speaker 1>That says to me businesses are hiring and people are working.

0:26:07.720 --> 0:26:09.960
<v Speaker 1>So if we go below two hundreds, that means we're

0:26:09.960 --> 0:26:12.560
<v Speaker 1>going below pre pandemic levels, and that's when I start

0:26:12.640 --> 0:26:17.880
<v Speaker 1>to pay attention. Okay, So I mean I do feel

0:26:17.920 --> 0:26:19.880
<v Speaker 1>like we don't have the playbook on all of this, right,

0:26:19.960 --> 0:26:22.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, pandemic coming out of a pandemic, you know,

0:26:22.840 --> 0:26:27.240
<v Speaker 1>taking away unprecedented amounts of stimulus that was different stimulus

0:26:27.480 --> 0:26:30.160
<v Speaker 1>from the financial crisis. Is it fair to say, though

0:26:30.600 --> 0:26:32.320
<v Speaker 1>you know some of what we're doing right now, we're

0:26:32.600 --> 0:26:37.040
<v Speaker 1>really making some big guesses. Oh? Absolutely, you know, but

0:26:37.080 --> 0:26:42.560
<v Speaker 1>the thing has Carol, that is always the case now. Yeah.

0:26:42.920 --> 0:26:46.040
<v Speaker 1>So for all the sense that you know, we know

0:26:46.119 --> 0:26:48.600
<v Speaker 1>what's going to happen, we can make some educated guesses

0:26:48.800 --> 0:26:50.800
<v Speaker 1>and overall we do pretty well. But when we get

0:26:50.840 --> 0:26:53.919
<v Speaker 1>into situations right now, I think you have to go

0:26:54.000 --> 0:26:56.400
<v Speaker 1>back to the fundamentals. And that's why I am where

0:26:56.400 --> 0:26:58.400
<v Speaker 1>I am. You know, I can tell you a lot

0:26:58.400 --> 0:27:02.399
<v Speaker 1>of scary stories, but businesses are still hiring, people are

0:27:02.400 --> 0:27:05.720
<v Speaker 1>still working, people are getting raises. You know, things are

0:27:05.760 --> 0:27:09.200
<v Speaker 1>getting better, not worse. And I think that's ultimately where

0:27:09.200 --> 0:27:13.080
<v Speaker 1>I've got to stand. I like the optimism here, Okay,

0:27:13.119 --> 0:27:15.919
<v Speaker 1>apart from job declines are two K a month, um,

0:27:15.920 --> 0:27:17.280
<v Speaker 1>where else should we be keeping an eye on? Just

0:27:17.320 --> 0:27:19.280
<v Speaker 1>in the last thirty seconds that we have with you, Brad,

0:27:20.119 --> 0:27:22.199
<v Speaker 1>I think oil prices at the big book. You know,

0:27:22.280 --> 0:27:25.560
<v Speaker 1>the question really is is Russia're going to change the

0:27:25.560 --> 0:27:28.639
<v Speaker 1>oil market structurally going forward, and we don't know yet.

0:27:29.119 --> 0:27:31.920
<v Speaker 1>That's the big negative wild card in my mind. Yeah,

0:27:31.960 --> 0:27:34.560
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a big one. I agree with you. Um,

0:27:34.680 --> 0:27:36.719
<v Speaker 1>we gotta run. Hey, Brad, good to check in with you,

0:27:36.760 --> 0:27:38.520
<v Speaker 1>get your thoughts in your perspective, and I do like

0:27:38.600 --> 0:27:41.320
<v Speaker 1>the level headed, uh feel of it. Brad McMillan, Chief

0:27:41.359 --> 0:27:44.800
<v Speaker 1>Investment Officer, Commonwealth Financial Network, joining us on the phone

0:27:44.800 --> 0:27:48.359
<v Speaker 1>from Waltham, Massachusetts. And roughly two hundwritten thirty two point

0:27:48.400 --> 0:27:51.679
<v Speaker 1>five billion in assets under managements have fall for Brad.

0:27:52.920 --> 0:27:55.760
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to Bloomberg Business Week. Download the podcast

0:27:55.800 --> 0:27:58.760
<v Speaker 1>on iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot com, and you can

0:27:58.800 --> 0:28:00.919
<v Speaker 1>also listen to our radio show at two pm Eastern

0:28:00.960 --> 0:28:04.120
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Radio or watch us on YouTube search Bloomberg

0:28:04.119 --> 0:28:06.600
<v Speaker 1>Global News m