1 00:00:09,160 --> 00:00:12,600 Speaker 1: Hello, and welcome to another episode of the Odd Lots Podcast. 2 00:00:12,680 --> 00:00:17,119 Speaker 1: I'm Tracy Alloway. My co host Joe Wisenthal is away. However, 3 00:00:17,440 --> 00:00:20,800 Speaker 1: I have a replacement co host for this very special episode. 4 00:00:21,079 --> 00:00:23,919 Speaker 1: We're going to be joined by Matt Levine. He is, 5 00:00:23,960 --> 00:00:27,840 Speaker 1: of course, a columnist over at Bloomberg Opinion. Matt, Welcome 6 00:00:27,880 --> 00:00:32,479 Speaker 1: to the show. Thanks for having me. So. I have 7 00:00:32,600 --> 00:00:35,680 Speaker 1: been covering bond markets for many, many years now, and 8 00:00:35,920 --> 00:00:40,200 Speaker 1: when you're covering bond markets, it feels like, at one 9 00:00:40,240 --> 00:00:44,760 Speaker 1: point in time there was no escape from a certain 10 00:00:44,840 --> 00:00:49,120 Speaker 1: bond investor, and that was a guy called Bill Gross. 11 00:00:49,240 --> 00:00:53,320 Speaker 1: If you were covering bond markets, at one point or another, 12 00:00:53,600 --> 00:00:57,760 Speaker 1: your path would cross with Bill Gross in some way. 13 00:00:58,040 --> 00:01:00,640 Speaker 1: It was either something he was doing, something that he 14 00:01:00,680 --> 00:01:04,400 Speaker 1: had said that you would inevitably have to write up. 15 00:01:04,400 --> 00:01:06,920 Speaker 1: And I don't know if you feel the same way, Mat, Oh, yeah, 16 00:01:06,920 --> 00:01:09,440 Speaker 1: I mean, in particular, he would write these monthly investment 17 00:01:09,440 --> 00:01:13,240 Speaker 1: outlooks that were always both widely covered because they were 18 00:01:13,720 --> 00:01:16,320 Speaker 1: the outlook of an important bond investor about the bond market, 19 00:01:16,560 --> 00:01:18,920 Speaker 1: but also because he had, like he began them with 20 00:01:19,000 --> 00:01:22,080 Speaker 1: embarrassing personal anecdotes, and you'd read them and be like, 21 00:01:22,120 --> 00:01:25,600 Speaker 1: did did this? Did this professional investor really just say that? 22 00:01:25,880 --> 00:01:28,520 Speaker 1: And every every month it would like he would top himself, 23 00:01:28,560 --> 00:01:30,880 Speaker 1: This guy in charge of billions of dollars worth of 24 00:01:31,120 --> 00:01:34,559 Speaker 1: people's money. Did he actually just write several hundred words 25 00:01:34,600 --> 00:01:37,200 Speaker 1: about his cat and things like that cat watching him 26 00:01:37,200 --> 00:01:41,240 Speaker 1: in the shower? I think was yeah? Okay. So Bill 27 00:01:41,240 --> 00:01:46,000 Speaker 1: Gross loomed large in financial journalists imaginations end over the 28 00:01:46,040 --> 00:01:50,600 Speaker 1: bond market. And then, of course we all remember when 29 00:01:50,640 --> 00:01:54,320 Speaker 1: he actually left the company that he had founded, which 30 00:01:54,360 --> 00:01:58,080 Speaker 1: is Pimco, and that just exploded into the headlines. You 31 00:01:58,120 --> 00:02:00,920 Speaker 1: remember that, oh yeah, he went to Janis, which I 32 00:02:00,920 --> 00:02:03,480 Speaker 1: think to this day remains a joke on financial Twitter 33 00:02:03,520 --> 00:02:05,680 Speaker 1: when anyone leaves a job that we say that they 34 00:02:05,720 --> 00:02:11,080 Speaker 1: went to Janis. That's that's sorry, that's exactly right. Um okay. 35 00:02:11,160 --> 00:02:14,480 Speaker 1: So when Bill Gross left Pimco, there were all these 36 00:02:14,560 --> 00:02:19,000 Speaker 1: questions swirling around both the man and the strategy and 37 00:02:19,080 --> 00:02:22,240 Speaker 1: the company. And I remember writing at the time that 38 00:02:22,280 --> 00:02:26,480 Speaker 1: there were still all these unanswered questions around who Bill 39 00:02:26,480 --> 00:02:32,120 Speaker 1: Gross was, what he was actually doing at PIMCO, And 40 00:02:32,240 --> 00:02:35,400 Speaker 1: I guess someone stepped up to try to answer all 41 00:02:35,400 --> 00:02:37,959 Speaker 1: those questions. And I am very very pleased to say 42 00:02:37,960 --> 00:02:41,400 Speaker 1: that today we're going to be speaking with Mary Childs. 43 00:02:41,440 --> 00:02:44,240 Speaker 1: She is, of course, the co host of nprs Planet 44 00:02:44,240 --> 00:02:47,760 Speaker 1: Money podcast and also the author of a new book. 45 00:02:47,919 --> 00:02:51,000 Speaker 1: It's called The Bond King. How One Man made a market, 46 00:02:51,160 --> 00:02:54,560 Speaker 1: built an empire, and lost it all And it's been 47 00:02:54,760 --> 00:02:57,960 Speaker 1: many years in the making. And uh, I'm thrilled to 48 00:02:58,160 --> 00:03:00,480 Speaker 1: have her on the show. So Mary, welcome to all thoughts. 49 00:03:00,800 --> 00:03:02,519 Speaker 1: Thank you so much for having me. I'm excited to 50 00:03:02,560 --> 00:03:05,280 Speaker 1: be here. So one of the things that always struck 51 00:03:05,320 --> 00:03:09,160 Speaker 1: me about Bill Gross, and maybe this is why you know, 52 00:03:09,240 --> 00:03:11,400 Speaker 1: you sort of took an interest in the story. But 53 00:03:11,760 --> 00:03:15,760 Speaker 1: when people think about bond investing, they normally think about 54 00:03:15,800 --> 00:03:17,800 Speaker 1: while you buy a bond and you know, you hold 55 00:03:17,840 --> 00:03:21,160 Speaker 1: it to maturity and it's really really boring. But the 56 00:03:21,200 --> 00:03:23,800 Speaker 1: thing about Bill Gross, and you go into this in 57 00:03:23,880 --> 00:03:27,120 Speaker 1: some detail in your book, is that he was doing 58 00:03:27,320 --> 00:03:31,880 Speaker 1: really complex things in the fixed income world. You know, 59 00:03:32,000 --> 00:03:34,960 Speaker 1: his funds were full of derivatives, full of future swaps, 60 00:03:35,400 --> 00:03:39,040 Speaker 1: lots of repo transactions, things that you wouldn't necessarily think 61 00:03:39,080 --> 00:03:44,320 Speaker 1: of when you think about traditional plane vanilla bond investing. Definitely, 62 00:03:44,360 --> 00:03:46,320 Speaker 1: and you're exactly right that That's one of the main 63 00:03:46,360 --> 00:03:48,600 Speaker 1: reasons why I got interested in this in the first place. 64 00:03:48,600 --> 00:03:51,600 Speaker 1: I feel like there is this misconception that, oh, my 65 00:03:51,680 --> 00:03:54,840 Speaker 1: bond fund is managed by like some dork in Boston 66 00:03:55,200 --> 00:03:58,920 Speaker 1: who doesn't do you know, Banana's stuff, And that's just 67 00:03:59,280 --> 00:04:01,160 Speaker 1: kind of not the you know, so many of our 68 00:04:01,240 --> 00:04:04,080 Speaker 1: retirement dollars do go to him, go and end up 69 00:04:04,320 --> 00:04:08,200 Speaker 1: doing very exciting things. And yeah, there's there's so much 70 00:04:08,280 --> 00:04:11,480 Speaker 1: room to to look into, you know, what Buil did 71 00:04:11,520 --> 00:04:13,760 Speaker 1: and the kind of extremely complicated trades that he put 72 00:04:13,800 --> 00:04:16,680 Speaker 1: on and the trade structures that I just find it 73 00:04:16,720 --> 00:04:20,039 Speaker 1: really kind of it's interesting both because of that misconception 74 00:04:20,080 --> 00:04:23,000 Speaker 1: but also just by virtue of being really elaborate and 75 00:04:23,080 --> 00:04:26,080 Speaker 1: smart and and fun trades. So one of the most 76 00:04:26,120 --> 00:04:28,520 Speaker 1: fun trades. And I feel like we could spend the 77 00:04:28,520 --> 00:04:30,680 Speaker 1: whole odd lots on this because it's like very odd. 78 00:04:31,279 --> 00:04:33,360 Speaker 1: In like the mid eighties, he did this trade on 79 00:04:33,520 --> 00:04:39,800 Speaker 1: Jenny May futures that basically break that market forever. Can 80 00:04:39,800 --> 00:04:42,640 Speaker 1: you describe that in enormous detail for the odd thoughts listeners? 81 00:04:43,960 --> 00:04:48,279 Speaker 1: So this is my Yeah, this is my favorite trade. Basically, 82 00:04:48,279 --> 00:04:51,440 Speaker 1: there was this futures contract that, um, I think was 83 00:04:51,680 --> 00:04:55,800 Speaker 1: you know, extremely popular in and people were trading it 84 00:04:55,920 --> 00:04:58,119 Speaker 1: with a lot of assumptions, you know, the mortgage markets, 85 00:04:58,120 --> 00:05:00,279 Speaker 1: and nearly very few people feel like they are actually 86 00:05:00,360 --> 00:05:03,200 Speaker 1: like can get into the particulars and the details and 87 00:05:03,240 --> 00:05:06,520 Speaker 1: then kind of expand that into the way these things 88 00:05:06,520 --> 00:05:08,640 Speaker 1: should be traded perfectly, Like like a lot of people 89 00:05:09,279 --> 00:05:12,039 Speaker 1: trade on models that they got from someone else or whatever. 90 00:05:12,400 --> 00:05:15,560 Speaker 1: And I think in this case, PIMCO just really read 91 00:05:15,600 --> 00:05:17,520 Speaker 1: into the details of the contract and they heard that 92 00:05:17,560 --> 00:05:19,240 Speaker 1: it was flawed, but they read into it and they 93 00:05:19,279 --> 00:05:22,440 Speaker 1: were like, wait, this is really flawed. There were two 94 00:05:22,560 --> 00:05:26,040 Speaker 1: kind of separate parts of it, two trades basically, where 95 00:05:26,040 --> 00:05:30,719 Speaker 1: one trade relied on the ability to demand physical delivery 96 00:05:30,800 --> 00:05:33,000 Speaker 1: and one trade relied on the fact that this this 97 00:05:33,320 --> 00:05:36,719 Speaker 1: contract had the option for a perpetual so you could 98 00:05:36,760 --> 00:05:39,080 Speaker 1: ask for it to be converted into a perpetual security 99 00:05:39,120 --> 00:05:43,880 Speaker 1: that paid you eight percent forever. That makes no sense, 100 00:05:44,400 --> 00:05:46,720 Speaker 1: I know. So I tried to talk to the guy 101 00:05:46,760 --> 00:05:48,919 Speaker 1: who built the contract and he was kind of like, no, 102 00:05:49,000 --> 00:05:50,800 Speaker 1: it's a great it's a great one. Love that one, 103 00:05:51,040 --> 00:05:54,880 Speaker 1: by which I understand. But I think, you know, they 104 00:05:54,880 --> 00:05:57,320 Speaker 1: were trying to make it attractive and rates were really 105 00:05:57,400 --> 00:05:59,080 Speaker 1: high at the time, So I think there was some 106 00:05:59,200 --> 00:06:02,080 Speaker 1: sense of like trying to entice people to play in 107 00:06:02,080 --> 00:06:03,800 Speaker 1: this market in the first place, because again, mortgages were 108 00:06:03,800 --> 00:06:06,800 Speaker 1: pretty poorly understood. I mean, there is a real explanation, 109 00:06:06,839 --> 00:06:09,080 Speaker 1: but also they were still figuring stuff out, you know, 110 00:06:09,200 --> 00:06:11,400 Speaker 1: like these were new contracts and this is kind of 111 00:06:11,440 --> 00:06:13,960 Speaker 1: a new frontier, so trying to find out what would work. 112 00:06:14,000 --> 00:06:16,200 Speaker 1: It was a little bit of trial and error. So 113 00:06:16,320 --> 00:06:19,760 Speaker 1: what exactly did PIMCO do in this situation? So you 114 00:06:19,760 --> 00:06:23,200 Speaker 1: have this new contract and this seems to be a 115 00:06:23,240 --> 00:06:26,719 Speaker 1: bit of a hallmark of pimco's strategy at that time, 116 00:06:26,800 --> 00:06:29,800 Speaker 1: but they actually read all the terms, did all their 117 00:06:29,880 --> 00:06:33,320 Speaker 1: due diligence and research, and basically figured out a way 118 00:06:33,360 --> 00:06:35,880 Speaker 1: to make lots of money out of it. That's exactly right. 119 00:06:35,960 --> 00:06:39,320 Speaker 1: So they basically realized that the market was, you know, 120 00:06:39,400 --> 00:06:42,040 Speaker 1: trying to account for the negative convexity of mortgage backed 121 00:06:42,080 --> 00:06:43,880 Speaker 1: securities in that that you know, would show up in 122 00:06:43,920 --> 00:06:47,719 Speaker 1: these Jenny May bundles. But what they weren't accounting for 123 00:06:47,960 --> 00:06:50,360 Speaker 1: was the kind of optionality and the fact that if 124 00:06:50,400 --> 00:06:54,120 Speaker 1: you accrued enough of the underlying the cheapest to deliver, 125 00:06:54,480 --> 00:06:56,440 Speaker 1: there just weren't that many in the world, and raids 126 00:06:56,480 --> 00:06:58,160 Speaker 1: had started to go down, so they were going to 127 00:06:58,200 --> 00:07:01,320 Speaker 1: be fewer and fewer, right, So Pimco realized this kind 128 00:07:01,320 --> 00:07:03,480 Speaker 1: of before anyone else, and they amassed a huge position 129 00:07:03,480 --> 00:07:06,680 Speaker 1: in these contracts, and then they demanded physical settlement of 130 00:07:06,760 --> 00:07:08,760 Speaker 1: the futures, which is to say, they will give me 131 00:07:08,800 --> 00:07:11,080 Speaker 1: your cheapest to deliver. Jenny May's right, and they didn't 132 00:07:11,280 --> 00:07:13,800 Speaker 1: have to demand physical settlement, right, They could have just 133 00:07:13,880 --> 00:07:16,240 Speaker 1: let the futures roll off, exactly, And that was what 134 00:07:16,280 --> 00:07:18,760 Speaker 1: everyone kind of expected everyone else to do. So part 135 00:07:18,800 --> 00:07:21,400 Speaker 1: of what they're playing with here is expectations everyone else's 136 00:07:21,440 --> 00:07:25,240 Speaker 1: normal behavior, and Pimco seems to always find that there's 137 00:07:25,280 --> 00:07:28,160 Speaker 1: just a little bit extra performance if you don't act normal. 138 00:07:28,520 --> 00:07:32,800 Speaker 1: Trade is just like you. These futures are priced assuming 139 00:07:32,840 --> 00:07:35,040 Speaker 1: that you deliver the cheapest to deliver security. And they 140 00:07:35,040 --> 00:07:38,120 Speaker 1: bought so many futures that that they sort of had 141 00:07:38,120 --> 00:07:40,360 Speaker 1: stripped the cheapest to deliver and like they were getting 142 00:07:40,600 --> 00:07:43,680 Speaker 1: much more valuable securities. That's exactly right. So yeah, they 143 00:07:43,720 --> 00:07:45,920 Speaker 1: would go to these people, you know, the counterparties, and 144 00:07:45,960 --> 00:07:48,360 Speaker 1: say give me your you know, I'm settling now, please 145 00:07:48,440 --> 00:07:50,600 Speaker 1: to give me the all of the you know, cheapest 146 00:07:50,640 --> 00:07:52,920 Speaker 1: deliver that you have, and the counterparty will be like, oh, 147 00:07:52,920 --> 00:07:55,680 Speaker 1: we don't we don't have enough. You have more than 148 00:07:55,760 --> 00:07:58,560 Speaker 1: we can satisfy, and they would have to hand over 149 00:07:58,760 --> 00:08:02,800 Speaker 1: much more valuable Jinny May's just to satisfy the delivery, 150 00:08:02,840 --> 00:08:06,200 Speaker 1: but the settlement. So basically, yeah, PIMCO was able to 151 00:08:06,360 --> 00:08:09,440 Speaker 1: outsize the market, which is actually something that you'll see later. 152 00:08:09,600 --> 00:08:11,840 Speaker 1: You know, they do this trade in different kind of 153 00:08:11,880 --> 00:08:15,760 Speaker 1: flavors over the years. So this is something that I've 154 00:08:15,800 --> 00:08:18,040 Speaker 1: been thinking about a lot, and I've thought about a 155 00:08:18,040 --> 00:08:20,120 Speaker 1: lot over the years. You know, I said earlier that 156 00:08:20,280 --> 00:08:23,360 Speaker 1: PIMCO and Bill Gross loomed large over the market, and 157 00:08:23,520 --> 00:08:27,360 Speaker 1: that is literally true. There was such a massive investor 158 00:08:27,760 --> 00:08:31,360 Speaker 1: that at times it seemed like their success was sort 159 00:08:31,400 --> 00:08:35,720 Speaker 1: of mixed up with their size. How much of Bill 160 00:08:35,760 --> 00:08:39,600 Speaker 1: Gross's strategy and the success that he enjoyed, how much 161 00:08:39,600 --> 00:08:43,120 Speaker 1: of that came from simply being bigger than everyone else. 162 00:08:43,600 --> 00:08:46,080 Speaker 1: I think that's such a good and astute question because 163 00:08:46,080 --> 00:08:49,319 Speaker 1: people often get that backwards, where they're like, oh, did 164 00:08:49,320 --> 00:08:51,720 Speaker 1: he underperform because he was too large for the market, 165 00:08:51,920 --> 00:08:53,920 Speaker 1: And you're right that that it actually was an asset. 166 00:08:53,960 --> 00:08:55,800 Speaker 1: You know, I guess in equities it's harder to maneuver 167 00:08:56,160 --> 00:08:58,880 Speaker 1: or or something, but in bonds it definitely can be 168 00:08:58,920 --> 00:09:01,559 Speaker 1: an advantage, especially in you know, anchoring a new issue 169 00:09:01,559 --> 00:09:03,760 Speaker 1: bond as it comes to market, you're gonna get more 170 00:09:03,760 --> 00:09:08,160 Speaker 1: of the allocation. And those always basically always outperform, you know, 171 00:09:08,200 --> 00:09:10,800 Speaker 1: pop when they when they hit the market. So I 172 00:09:10,840 --> 00:09:13,359 Speaker 1: think it's hard to say how much of the outperformance 173 00:09:13,480 --> 00:09:15,640 Speaker 1: was due to size and thinking of this paper that 174 00:09:15,679 --> 00:09:18,400 Speaker 1: to researchers did in that kind of teased out the 175 00:09:18,440 --> 00:09:21,079 Speaker 1: reasons for Bill Gross and pimcoes out performance over the decades, 176 00:09:21,320 --> 00:09:24,200 Speaker 1: and that was one of their kind of grab bag items, 177 00:09:24,200 --> 00:09:25,719 Speaker 1: you know, they were like, this is not something that 178 00:09:26,120 --> 00:09:28,920 Speaker 1: they were able to strip out as a factor, but 179 00:09:29,160 --> 00:09:32,760 Speaker 1: it's basically present throughout pimcoes total returns history, where they 180 00:09:32,760 --> 00:09:34,880 Speaker 1: were always a bit big for the market and for 181 00:09:34,960 --> 00:09:38,920 Speaker 1: the mortgage backed market, but we're the big factors. So 182 00:09:39,200 --> 00:09:42,520 Speaker 1: it's interesting. There are three main ones that those researchers found, 183 00:09:42,559 --> 00:09:45,679 Speaker 1: and it actually aligns pretty well with what so a 184 00:09:45,760 --> 00:09:48,640 Speaker 1: source told me, gosh five years ago, because I've been 185 00:09:48,640 --> 00:09:50,520 Speaker 1: working on this for too long, that there were only 186 00:09:50,880 --> 00:09:53,319 Speaker 1: four things you needed to know to do well at PIMCO. 187 00:09:53,360 --> 00:09:55,920 Speaker 1: Theres there are four things at PIMCO does long duration, 188 00:09:56,440 --> 00:09:58,600 Speaker 1: the curve, focusing more on like the four or five 189 00:09:58,640 --> 00:10:02,160 Speaker 1: year part, going long credit, and short ball. That's it. 190 00:10:02,880 --> 00:10:06,080 Speaker 1: And you know, short ball means selling volatility and finding 191 00:10:06,080 --> 00:10:09,560 Speaker 1: other ways to kind of embed optionality and leverage in 192 00:10:09,559 --> 00:10:12,400 Speaker 1: in your kind of everyday life if you will, and 193 00:10:12,440 --> 00:10:14,920 Speaker 1: avoid buying options to write like like, one thing that 194 00:10:14,960 --> 00:10:16,640 Speaker 1: he says in some of the outlooks is that he 195 00:10:16,760 --> 00:10:18,760 Speaker 1: like doesn't want to pay up for bonds with a 196 00:10:18,760 --> 00:10:22,120 Speaker 1: lot of convexity because like, optionality is not worth anything 197 00:10:22,160 --> 00:10:23,920 Speaker 1: to him right right. He wants to be selling it, 198 00:10:24,000 --> 00:10:26,960 Speaker 1: not buying it because he realizes that people want to 199 00:10:27,000 --> 00:10:30,200 Speaker 1: sleep at night and he doesn't care. Everyone else wants 200 00:10:30,200 --> 00:10:33,880 Speaker 1: the optionality and unless he can get compensated over and above. 201 00:10:34,000 --> 00:10:35,640 Speaker 1: It's in contrast to the Jenny May where there was 202 00:10:35,640 --> 00:10:37,839 Speaker 1: a lot of optionality, but it was stuff that they exercised. 203 00:10:38,000 --> 00:10:40,040 Speaker 1: They don't want options just to be able to do 204 00:10:40,040 --> 00:10:41,559 Speaker 1: what they want to actually do it if they want them, 205 00:10:41,559 --> 00:10:43,960 Speaker 1: you know. So he like he was the bond king. 206 00:10:44,000 --> 00:10:47,200 Speaker 1: He had a great run for decades and then he 207 00:10:47,280 --> 00:10:49,440 Speaker 1: left to go to Janice. You know, I think it 208 00:10:49,440 --> 00:10:51,240 Speaker 1: would be fair to say did not continue to have 209 00:10:51,280 --> 00:10:53,160 Speaker 1: a great run. So like when you when you list 210 00:10:53,200 --> 00:10:55,480 Speaker 1: those factors, it's like long duration, long credit, you know, 211 00:10:55,559 --> 00:11:00,240 Speaker 1: short ball that describes a sort of placid market of 212 00:11:00,320 --> 00:11:03,480 Speaker 1: generally declining that's a strategy for a placid market of 213 00:11:03,480 --> 00:11:06,160 Speaker 1: generally declining rates, which is kind of what he had 214 00:11:06,200 --> 00:11:09,160 Speaker 1: for like thirty years. Did he just like miss a 215 00:11:09,240 --> 00:11:11,560 Speaker 1: regime change? Was he like a really good investor for 216 00:11:11,640 --> 00:11:14,599 Speaker 1: like a particularly long bond bull market and then he 217 00:11:14,640 --> 00:11:17,720 Speaker 1: couldn't adapt? You know what's going on? I think to 218 00:11:17,760 --> 00:11:20,680 Speaker 1: some extent, yes. And there's this um famous at least 219 00:11:20,679 --> 00:11:24,040 Speaker 1: to me, investment outlook from April where he asks, am 220 00:11:24,040 --> 00:11:26,720 Speaker 1: I a great investor? No? Not yet, because he was 221 00:11:26,760 --> 00:11:29,040 Speaker 1: basically seeing the same thing that you are. That he'd 222 00:11:29,080 --> 00:11:31,840 Speaker 1: had a long bull market to invest in. He'd done 223 00:11:31,880 --> 00:11:33,680 Speaker 1: really well over that time period, but he felt that 224 00:11:33,720 --> 00:11:36,120 Speaker 1: he was pretty untested, he and all of his peers, right, 225 00:11:36,640 --> 00:11:39,640 Speaker 1: and you know when he went to Janice. It's it's 226 00:11:39,640 --> 00:11:41,560 Speaker 1: hard to say because over the longer term, you know, 227 00:11:41,600 --> 00:11:43,240 Speaker 1: interest rates are lower now than they were then, or 228 00:11:43,280 --> 00:11:45,160 Speaker 1: they you know, were lower now than they were then. 229 00:11:45,600 --> 00:11:48,000 Speaker 1: So they've walked around a little bit, right, But from 230 00:11:48,120 --> 00:11:50,920 Speaker 1: his start date at Janice through his retirement date, you know, 231 00:11:51,200 --> 00:11:54,480 Speaker 1: it actually did interest rates date go up. So I 232 00:11:54,520 --> 00:11:57,319 Speaker 1: do think you're right. I think that that over that period, 233 00:11:57,480 --> 00:11:59,480 Speaker 1: over his long career, he did have the benefit of 234 00:11:59,559 --> 00:12:01,720 Speaker 1: a bullmark it. And yes, his strategies I think did 235 00:12:01,800 --> 00:12:05,320 Speaker 1: perform better in those in that environment, you know, like 236 00:12:05,360 --> 00:12:08,440 Speaker 1: buying credit, focusing on duration, like all of these things 237 00:12:08,520 --> 00:12:12,080 Speaker 1: absolutely perform better when you have the wind at your back. 238 00:12:12,400 --> 00:12:15,360 Speaker 1: Cash and cash equivalent arbitrage kind of is that an 239 00:12:15,400 --> 00:12:18,920 Speaker 1: abuse of that word? Are you upset? I think it's okay, 240 00:12:18,960 --> 00:12:21,360 Speaker 1: this is a safe space. You're allowing that. Okay, thank you. 241 00:12:23,600 --> 00:12:26,079 Speaker 1: There's a colloquial arbitrage and then a real one, and 242 00:12:26,080 --> 00:12:33,040 Speaker 1: I'm using the colloquial thank you all accept But basically, 243 00:12:33,120 --> 00:12:36,840 Speaker 1: they you know, when they had a position that required cash, 244 00:12:36,880 --> 00:12:39,360 Speaker 1: required them to hold cash against it, a lot of 245 00:12:39,400 --> 00:12:41,600 Speaker 1: their competitors would be like, okay, cash, great, I shall 246 00:12:41,640 --> 00:12:44,880 Speaker 1: hold cash, and PIMCO was like, okay, great, and cash equivalence, 247 00:12:45,280 --> 00:12:46,920 Speaker 1: what do you mean? You know, how how can we 248 00:12:47,000 --> 00:12:49,160 Speaker 1: what does that mean? Exactly? And they would go as 249 00:12:49,200 --> 00:12:52,640 Speaker 1: far as they humanly could to the extent of risk 250 00:12:52,679 --> 00:12:55,200 Speaker 1: taking in that cash equivalent bucket. So that means, you know, 251 00:12:55,640 --> 00:12:58,800 Speaker 1: short dated corporate floating notes and making sure that they're 252 00:12:58,840 --> 00:13:01,320 Speaker 1: getting every last potential a basis point out of that 253 00:13:01,840 --> 00:13:05,840 Speaker 1: and equivalence bucket, where everyone else is just getting whatever 254 00:13:05,880 --> 00:13:08,880 Speaker 1: cash is yielding and not sweating it, not kind of 255 00:13:08,920 --> 00:13:11,920 Speaker 1: going that extra marginal mile to to get the extra 256 00:13:11,920 --> 00:13:14,240 Speaker 1: basis point. So I love that. Like he's like this 257 00:13:14,440 --> 00:13:18,719 Speaker 1: renowned bond investor who becomes a billionaire and at the 258 00:13:18,840 --> 00:13:21,079 Speaker 1: end of like a bunch of the years in the book, 259 00:13:21,160 --> 00:13:24,199 Speaker 1: you know, when he's like performing the market, it's like 260 00:13:24,320 --> 00:13:26,360 Speaker 1: he had a blowout yere in youth asand eight he 261 00:13:26,400 --> 00:13:29,079 Speaker 1: saw the crisis and no one else did. He outperformed 262 00:13:29,160 --> 00:13:32,760 Speaker 1: his peers by thirty five basis point. Okay, it was 263 00:13:32,800 --> 00:13:37,800 Speaker 1: two percentage points actually, as like, but this is like 264 00:13:39,160 --> 00:13:41,439 Speaker 1: we're like, you know, John Paulson is like tupled his 265 00:13:41,520 --> 00:13:45,880 Speaker 1: funder or whatever. Right, like people who like called the crisis, right, 266 00:13:46,000 --> 00:13:48,520 Speaker 1: you know, the sort of stereotype is that they like 267 00:13:48,880 --> 00:13:51,200 Speaker 1: started with a little bit of money, ended at a billionaires, 268 00:13:51,240 --> 00:13:54,199 Speaker 1: but like Bill Grass started with trillions of dollars and 269 00:13:54,240 --> 00:13:57,800 Speaker 1: like added like two to it um. How does that like, 270 00:13:58,000 --> 00:13:59,920 Speaker 1: how should we think about that performance? I don't know. 271 00:14:00,760 --> 00:14:02,520 Speaker 1: The fundamental thing that I think you're hitting on there 272 00:14:02,640 --> 00:14:04,760 Speaker 1: is the structure of the trade where a lot of 273 00:14:04,760 --> 00:14:08,640 Speaker 1: the people that were you know, big short type crisis callers, 274 00:14:09,080 --> 00:14:13,319 Speaker 1: they structured trades based more on time, where if they 275 00:14:13,360 --> 00:14:15,200 Speaker 1: had messed up the time horizon, and many of some 276 00:14:15,280 --> 00:14:16,920 Speaker 1: of them did and didn't make it into the kind 277 00:14:16,920 --> 00:14:20,360 Speaker 1: of pantheon, the whole trade wouldn't work. So there was 278 00:14:20,400 --> 00:14:24,840 Speaker 1: a lot of that was extremely risky. So the Pimco 279 00:14:25,280 --> 00:14:28,200 Speaker 1: view was, yeah, we think this thing is coming, we 280 00:14:28,280 --> 00:14:31,800 Speaker 1: have no ability to say when exactly, and we're going 281 00:14:31,840 --> 00:14:35,680 Speaker 1: to structure a long, a longer term trade around this. 282 00:14:35,840 --> 00:14:38,720 Speaker 1: Where they both pulled back on risk going into the crisis, 283 00:14:39,080 --> 00:14:41,560 Speaker 1: and then we're able to scoop things up when things 284 00:14:41,600 --> 00:14:43,160 Speaker 1: were healing. You know, everyone else was selling it a 285 00:14:43,160 --> 00:14:45,400 Speaker 1: discount because they're panicking, and they weren't, you know, hadn't 286 00:14:45,440 --> 00:14:47,840 Speaker 1: had the same foresight. Pim goes able to buy those 287 00:14:47,880 --> 00:14:50,400 Speaker 1: assets at an extreme discount and then outperformed for more years. 288 00:14:50,400 --> 00:14:52,400 Speaker 1: So if you look over the longer time horizon, and 289 00:14:52,440 --> 00:14:55,800 Speaker 1: this is also Indiana Iversonce Fund and PIMCO income where 290 00:14:56,040 --> 00:14:59,040 Speaker 1: you see that they not only did well stepping back 291 00:14:59,040 --> 00:15:01,040 Speaker 1: and not taking the same risks as everyone going into 292 00:15:01,080 --> 00:15:03,560 Speaker 1: the crisis, but then in the years after. So it's 293 00:15:03,600 --> 00:15:07,080 Speaker 1: more of a cumulative over many years. But also, yeah, 294 00:15:07,120 --> 00:15:10,320 Speaker 1: it's just mutual funds. You're going to have less exciting 295 00:15:10,480 --> 00:15:12,960 Speaker 1: or you're supposed to have less exciting. You're not supposed 296 00:15:13,000 --> 00:15:15,280 Speaker 1: to have a blow out like that. Just on that point, 297 00:15:15,400 --> 00:15:18,040 Speaker 1: here's a slightly weird question, but do you think that 298 00:15:18,920 --> 00:15:25,640 Speaker 1: Bill Gross, either knowingly or perhaps by accident, missold what 299 00:15:25,800 --> 00:15:30,280 Speaker 1: bond investing actually was, because I remember in the early 300 00:15:30,320 --> 00:15:32,920 Speaker 1: two thousands, you know, he was talking about this idea 301 00:15:33,040 --> 00:15:35,480 Speaker 1: that if you do it the right way, you can 302 00:15:35,480 --> 00:15:39,080 Speaker 1: get stock like returns on on bonds which are supposed 303 00:15:39,120 --> 00:15:41,000 Speaker 1: to be safer, and the way you do it is 304 00:15:41,000 --> 00:15:44,960 Speaker 1: you use lots of volatility selling strategies and use lots 305 00:15:45,000 --> 00:15:48,000 Speaker 1: of leverage and things like that. Is that is that 306 00:15:48,040 --> 00:15:51,720 Speaker 1: what bond investing should be or is there inherently, you know, 307 00:15:51,800 --> 00:15:54,720 Speaker 1: a discrepancy between stocks and bonds and the returns that 308 00:15:54,760 --> 00:15:58,040 Speaker 1: are possible there. I love that. I think there's probably 309 00:15:58,480 --> 00:16:02,240 Speaker 1: you know, he always got this ding. I think where 310 00:16:02,480 --> 00:16:04,720 Speaker 1: people called him a hedge fund manager and a mutual 311 00:16:04,720 --> 00:16:08,040 Speaker 1: fund rapper, and I think that's probably true. You're exactly right. 312 00:16:08,080 --> 00:16:10,680 Speaker 1: I kind of wanted my bonds to be managed my 313 00:16:10,680 --> 00:16:12,440 Speaker 1: bond funds to be managed by a Doric in Boston. 314 00:16:12,480 --> 00:16:15,000 Speaker 1: Like I'm trying to stay calm here. I don't necessarily 315 00:16:15,000 --> 00:16:17,040 Speaker 1: want you to be doing Like one guy told me 316 00:16:17,080 --> 00:16:20,040 Speaker 1: that the consultants used to call this gross cash. They're like, 317 00:16:20,080 --> 00:16:21,720 Speaker 1: I don't know what you're doing with this cash and 318 00:16:21,720 --> 00:16:23,480 Speaker 1: cash equivalent stuff and lamb to cash and all these 319 00:16:23,520 --> 00:16:27,120 Speaker 1: other strategies that they used. It. It was like it's working, 320 00:16:27,160 --> 00:16:30,000 Speaker 1: so I don't mind. But I'm like, whatever, you're doing, 321 00:16:30,040 --> 00:16:32,600 Speaker 1: this like weird magic in the market, Like thank you great. 322 00:16:32,680 --> 00:16:35,280 Speaker 1: I'm not going to look too closely. And I'm sure 323 00:16:35,360 --> 00:16:37,760 Speaker 1: you know they're all fiduciaries. Everyone looked closely. I'm sure 324 00:16:37,760 --> 00:16:40,200 Speaker 1: they did that. But there is an element of like 325 00:16:40,960 --> 00:16:44,760 Speaker 1: not examining it when it's working and it worked for 326 00:16:44,800 --> 00:16:46,720 Speaker 1: a long time. You know, it was obviously to your 327 00:16:46,760 --> 00:16:48,480 Speaker 1: benefit for a very long time. But at the same time, 328 00:16:48,520 --> 00:16:51,120 Speaker 1: it's like, is this good risk that we're taking? Is 329 00:16:51,160 --> 00:16:53,160 Speaker 1: this what I want to be doing there? This is 330 00:16:53,280 --> 00:16:55,280 Speaker 1: kind of funny. To me where like the cash equivalent thing, 331 00:16:55,800 --> 00:16:58,640 Speaker 1: there was apparently a pretty robust debate at times about 332 00:16:58,640 --> 00:17:01,520 Speaker 1: whether or not Russian owners should count in the cash 333 00:17:01,560 --> 00:17:05,399 Speaker 1: equivalent bucket, saying that right now today it feels bananas, right, 334 00:17:05,440 --> 00:17:08,480 Speaker 1: like that shouldn't be a conversation. But in other times 335 00:17:08,520 --> 00:17:10,680 Speaker 1: you can imagine that that's like, it's probably fine, it's 336 00:17:10,720 --> 00:17:12,720 Speaker 1: probably fine, we can get away with it. And is 337 00:17:12,720 --> 00:17:14,719 Speaker 1: that what you want as a mutual fund investor, like 338 00:17:14,760 --> 00:17:16,359 Speaker 1: with your retirement money, you want to get away with 339 00:17:16,400 --> 00:17:34,359 Speaker 1: Russian floaters. I don't know. I feel like it's odd 340 00:17:34,359 --> 00:17:36,600 Speaker 1: lots we should talk about the bond market, but like 341 00:17:36,640 --> 00:17:38,960 Speaker 1: your book is like partially about the bond market, but 342 00:17:39,000 --> 00:17:41,919 Speaker 1: it's also a lot about like the human drama of 343 00:17:42,000 --> 00:17:45,840 Speaker 1: Bill Griss's overthrow. His character is sort of like he's 344 00:17:45,840 --> 00:17:49,160 Speaker 1: a genius investor who is not good with people, and 345 00:17:50,000 --> 00:17:54,679 Speaker 1: he works at this institution where he's not the CEO, 346 00:17:54,840 --> 00:17:57,720 Speaker 1: he's the chief investment officer, he makes the trading calls, 347 00:17:58,200 --> 00:18:02,399 Speaker 1: and someone else in charge of management, and yet his 348 00:18:02,520 --> 00:18:05,760 Speaker 1: managerial style is sort of what pervades the place and 349 00:18:05,840 --> 00:18:09,639 Speaker 1: what ends up I think getting him outsted. How can you, like, 350 00:18:09,800 --> 00:18:12,800 Speaker 1: you know, have that guy, run your investments and not 351 00:18:12,920 --> 00:18:16,480 Speaker 1: drive everyone crazy. Yeah, I think. I mean it worked 352 00:18:16,480 --> 00:18:19,399 Speaker 1: for a long time in part because there were people 353 00:18:19,400 --> 00:18:22,760 Speaker 1: in the CEO position that Bill trusted and respected, and 354 00:18:23,000 --> 00:18:25,320 Speaker 1: if that's the case, he kind of can or could 355 00:18:25,760 --> 00:18:27,879 Speaker 1: allow them to do their job and manage people and 356 00:18:27,880 --> 00:18:30,720 Speaker 1: make executive choices, and he wasn't really going to interfere. 357 00:18:30,720 --> 00:18:32,800 Speaker 1: He might like snark around a little bit and give 358 00:18:32,880 --> 00:18:35,280 Speaker 1: them the silent treatment for hiring too many people or whatever, 359 00:18:35,320 --> 00:18:38,440 Speaker 1: but he's not gonna He generally let them do their jobs. 360 00:18:38,680 --> 00:18:42,000 Speaker 1: And I think that's part of it is, you know, 361 00:18:42,040 --> 00:18:44,399 Speaker 1: in the seventies and eighties and nineties, this was a 362 00:18:44,400 --> 00:18:46,520 Speaker 1: bit easier because a lot of the people came up 363 00:18:46,520 --> 00:18:49,560 Speaker 1: with him and were his peers and he respected them. 364 00:18:49,600 --> 00:18:53,080 Speaker 1: And then when you get Muhammadalarian in the door. You know, 365 00:18:53,119 --> 00:18:56,560 Speaker 1: there are multiple reasons why that that relationship didn't really 366 00:18:56,600 --> 00:18:59,119 Speaker 1: work out. Um one being that their personalities are just 367 00:18:59,200 --> 00:19:03,000 Speaker 1: so different and their managerial instincts and investing instincts are 368 00:19:03,040 --> 00:19:06,600 Speaker 1: so different. One reason being that, you know, Bill, you know, 369 00:19:06,640 --> 00:19:09,280 Speaker 1: there's this this sense that Mohammed at the eleventh hour 370 00:19:09,400 --> 00:19:12,560 Speaker 1: asked to be co c i O and co CEO Um, 371 00:19:12,640 --> 00:19:13,960 Speaker 1: you know, he was supposed to just be kind of 372 00:19:13,960 --> 00:19:18,240 Speaker 1: Bill's air. But I think you know, having that, having 373 00:19:18,280 --> 00:19:22,320 Speaker 1: someone in that role who he mistrusted, was probably to 374 00:19:22,440 --> 00:19:25,360 Speaker 1: some extent always going to be a cursed outcome. If 375 00:19:25,359 --> 00:19:28,440 Speaker 1: you're able to keep the lanes clean and able to 376 00:19:28,440 --> 00:19:30,639 Speaker 1: to let him just do his job, Yes, it creates 377 00:19:30,640 --> 00:19:33,239 Speaker 1: this culture. But I think you I think they were 378 00:19:33,320 --> 00:19:35,560 Speaker 1: able to navigate around that culture for a long time. 379 00:19:36,280 --> 00:19:38,440 Speaker 1: Is that there's an open questions to whether that would 380 00:19:38,440 --> 00:19:41,919 Speaker 1: have been successful even with the optimal chief executive in 381 00:19:41,960 --> 00:19:44,159 Speaker 1: today's climate where we've done a lot of kind of 382 00:19:44,280 --> 00:19:47,920 Speaker 1: renegotiation of what we ask from our employers. But but yeah, 383 00:19:47,960 --> 00:19:49,840 Speaker 1: I think it's it's a matter of like respect and 384 00:19:49,880 --> 00:19:54,159 Speaker 1: trust and allowing people to to give each other space. No, 385 00:19:57,920 --> 00:19:59,800 Speaker 1: I think it's safe to say no. They were kind 386 00:19:59,800 --> 00:20:02,520 Speaker 1: of trying to project that for a while, and I 387 00:20:02,560 --> 00:20:05,399 Speaker 1: asked folks on the street, and I asked people inside, 388 00:20:05,440 --> 00:20:07,760 Speaker 1: and they were like, no, if anything gets worse. So 389 00:20:07,960 --> 00:20:10,040 Speaker 1: I don't know, take that as you will. So just 390 00:20:10,119 --> 00:20:14,280 Speaker 1: on that note, I mean reading your your notes as 391 00:20:14,320 --> 00:20:17,600 Speaker 1: an author, and there's a very funny but also disturbing 392 00:20:17,600 --> 00:20:21,639 Speaker 1: anecdote about the rumors um swirling around you as you 393 00:20:21,760 --> 00:20:24,679 Speaker 1: reported out this book for many, many years. But one 394 00:20:24,720 --> 00:20:27,200 Speaker 1: of the things you talk about is this idea of 395 00:20:27,280 --> 00:20:31,600 Speaker 1: the toxicity of that work environment kind of rubbing off 396 00:20:31,680 --> 00:20:34,680 Speaker 1: on you as you interview all these people who all 397 00:20:34,800 --> 00:20:37,120 Speaker 1: have their own agendas, who all want to tell their 398 00:20:37,119 --> 00:20:42,600 Speaker 1: own versions of the history. What was that like. I 399 00:20:42,600 --> 00:20:44,760 Speaker 1: don't know if this happens to every reporter, but I 400 00:20:44,800 --> 00:20:47,359 Speaker 1: feel like when I talked to a particularly paranoid source, 401 00:20:47,400 --> 00:20:50,760 Speaker 1: I come away just totally rattled. Like I internalize a 402 00:20:50,800 --> 00:20:53,720 Speaker 1: lot of their anxiety and paranoia, and I just it 403 00:20:53,800 --> 00:20:57,560 Speaker 1: just stays with me. And these people, the people I 404 00:20:57,600 --> 00:20:59,520 Speaker 1: talked to you you for this book were largely all like that. 405 00:20:59,600 --> 00:21:01,240 Speaker 1: I mean, there are some exceptions, people who had got 406 00:21:01,280 --> 00:21:03,240 Speaker 1: out with their head on straight and retired and whatever. 407 00:21:03,280 --> 00:21:05,520 Speaker 1: But to a very large extent, the people that I 408 00:21:05,800 --> 00:21:10,520 Speaker 1: that I dealt with were very competitive, very petty, very 409 00:21:10,560 --> 00:21:13,439 Speaker 1: score subtly. And one thing that I kind of didn't 410 00:21:14,040 --> 00:21:17,160 Speaker 1: appreciate the magnitude of this, but like a lot of people, 411 00:21:17,280 --> 00:21:21,320 Speaker 1: the events of messed up their profit sharing. Even if 412 00:21:21,359 --> 00:21:23,000 Speaker 1: they were retired, you know, they had this kind of 413 00:21:23,000 --> 00:21:27,040 Speaker 1: profit sharing slice of PIMCO, and because of the ridiculousness. 414 00:21:28,119 --> 00:21:31,760 Speaker 1: You know, Muhammadalarian leaving Bill Girls leaving. It hurt the 415 00:21:31,840 --> 00:21:34,879 Speaker 1: kind of forward profits for the firm, and people were 416 00:21:35,440 --> 00:21:38,480 Speaker 1: really mad because it affected, you know, the payments that 417 00:21:38,520 --> 00:21:40,520 Speaker 1: they expected to be get anyway. So there was a 418 00:21:40,520 --> 00:21:43,360 Speaker 1: lot of financial anxiety that came to bear as well, 419 00:21:43,400 --> 00:21:45,600 Speaker 1: which is like funny because you know, I'm a public 420 00:21:45,680 --> 00:21:48,119 Speaker 1: radio journalists, so that contrast was a bit sharp at times. 421 00:21:48,600 --> 00:21:51,000 Speaker 1: There was Matt Knows this story. There was one person's 422 00:21:51,040 --> 00:21:52,680 Speaker 1: wife who was like, so, what are you going to 423 00:21:52,760 --> 00:21:56,320 Speaker 1: do with the proceeds from the book? And I was like, um, 424 00:21:56,600 --> 00:21:59,639 Speaker 1: eat them, Like I don't understand, Like it's my I 425 00:21:59,720 --> 00:22:01,239 Speaker 1: was like, naughty. I didn't have a day job at 426 00:22:01,240 --> 00:22:04,120 Speaker 1: the time. It was literally and and let me be clear, 427 00:22:04,119 --> 00:22:05,919 Speaker 1: you know this comes in in chunk, so I was 428 00:22:05,960 --> 00:22:09,439 Speaker 1: living on not a lot of money, and and she 429 00:22:09,560 --> 00:22:11,560 Speaker 1: was like, well, if you need suggestions for charities, just 430 00:22:11,640 --> 00:22:14,240 Speaker 1: let me know. And I was like, thank you. I 431 00:22:14,280 --> 00:22:17,320 Speaker 1: do know of charities personally, but I appreciate the offer 432 00:22:17,359 --> 00:22:20,520 Speaker 1: and I will consider it. Um, but yeah, there was 433 00:22:20,560 --> 00:22:25,880 Speaker 1: definitely I don't know that insecurity can can rub off 434 00:22:25,880 --> 00:22:29,479 Speaker 1: on you for sure, Like I'm not unfamiliar with rumors. 435 00:22:29,480 --> 00:22:31,240 Speaker 1: You know, I was in a sorority. Like it felt 436 00:22:31,320 --> 00:22:35,840 Speaker 1: very familiar to me, but it was also so unsettling 437 00:22:35,840 --> 00:22:37,480 Speaker 1: because I'm just there to do a job. I'm not 438 00:22:37,520 --> 00:22:40,119 Speaker 1: trying to hurt anybody. I'm not trying to like take sides, 439 00:22:40,119 --> 00:22:42,439 Speaker 1: which they all always thought. I'm not trying to like 440 00:22:42,480 --> 00:22:44,200 Speaker 1: pick favorites. I don't have a dog in the fight. 441 00:22:44,280 --> 00:22:46,400 Speaker 1: I just want to tell the truth in this sort 442 00:22:46,440 --> 00:22:49,920 Speaker 1: of like fight over pushing grass out, like everyone was 443 00:22:50,000 --> 00:22:53,399 Speaker 1: kind of using the press, where like you know, Gross 444 00:22:53,480 --> 00:22:56,040 Speaker 1: is obsessed that like his enemies were leaking to the 445 00:22:56,080 --> 00:22:58,920 Speaker 1: press about him, and then he would call into TV 446 00:22:58,960 --> 00:23:01,600 Speaker 1: shows or call reporters and say things that in hindsight 447 00:23:01,640 --> 00:23:06,760 Speaker 1: were really embarrassing. Um, was that fun? I yeah. I 448 00:23:06,800 --> 00:23:10,440 Speaker 1: mean it's tough because, as you know, I hate being 449 00:23:10,480 --> 00:23:13,440 Speaker 1: a conduit. I really hate when my entire role in 450 00:23:13,480 --> 00:23:16,920 Speaker 1: a situation is simply conduiting someone's thoughts. Obviously, as a 451 00:23:16,960 --> 00:23:19,919 Speaker 1: journalist that happens a lot. But I like to be 452 00:23:19,960 --> 00:23:22,520 Speaker 1: able to use my brain and participate and you know 453 00:23:22,920 --> 00:23:25,159 Speaker 1: the way things myself and come to a judgment. You know, 454 00:23:25,160 --> 00:23:27,639 Speaker 1: I like to be kind of an active participant in 455 00:23:27,640 --> 00:23:30,160 Speaker 1: in my job. So to some extent it was it's 456 00:23:30,160 --> 00:23:32,800 Speaker 1: really annoying to be used as a tool for score settling, 457 00:23:33,240 --> 00:23:36,080 Speaker 1: and I think it's it's interesting because it's so not 458 00:23:36,200 --> 00:23:39,320 Speaker 1: that emotional. It's so not that like, I just don't 459 00:23:39,320 --> 00:23:42,480 Speaker 1: have a team, and that seems very hard for a 460 00:23:42,560 --> 00:23:45,359 Speaker 1: lot of people to grasp. Do you feel like after 461 00:23:45,400 --> 00:23:48,040 Speaker 1: finishing this book you have a better handle on what 462 00:23:48,359 --> 00:23:52,040 Speaker 1: drives people like Bill Gross and at some of the 463 00:23:52,080 --> 00:23:54,520 Speaker 1: other executives at PIMCO. So, I know you talked in 464 00:23:54,520 --> 00:23:58,280 Speaker 1: the book a lot about Gross emphatically said he wanted 465 00:23:58,320 --> 00:24:00,720 Speaker 1: to become famous. He wanted to I'm a very very 466 00:24:00,760 --> 00:24:04,640 Speaker 1: famous bond investor, and obviously he wanted to get rich 467 00:24:04,720 --> 00:24:06,920 Speaker 1: and he seems to have been very successful at doing that. 468 00:24:07,600 --> 00:24:09,240 Speaker 1: And then you have a lot of money involved for 469 00:24:09,320 --> 00:24:11,119 Speaker 1: the other executives. I think towards the end of the 470 00:24:11,119 --> 00:24:13,520 Speaker 1: book you talked about one of the bonus um pools 471 00:24:13,520 --> 00:24:16,920 Speaker 1: being something like five million dollars between just Gross and 472 00:24:16,960 --> 00:24:19,840 Speaker 1: all area and yeah, yeah, which I mean, you know, 473 00:24:20,160 --> 00:24:23,439 Speaker 1: half of five million. I'm sure we'll motivate anyone. But 474 00:24:24,400 --> 00:24:28,800 Speaker 1: given all this revenge seeking and some of the behavior 475 00:24:28,960 --> 00:24:32,399 Speaker 1: that you wrote about and that we witnessed in and 476 00:24:32,520 --> 00:24:35,480 Speaker 1: years after that. What do you think drives these people? 477 00:24:36,320 --> 00:24:41,000 Speaker 1: Mm hmm. I think it's instructive to look at Bill's 478 00:24:41,040 --> 00:24:45,000 Speaker 1: behavior without the money management, you know, since his retirement, 479 00:24:45,680 --> 00:24:48,960 Speaker 1: there's this I get the sense that he digs in 480 00:24:49,160 --> 00:24:51,480 Speaker 1: and he's he's put it that he doesn't back down 481 00:24:51,520 --> 00:24:54,880 Speaker 1: from a fight. He can get entrenched in these bilateral 482 00:24:55,600 --> 00:24:57,960 Speaker 1: I don't know, I don't want to say wars, but 483 00:24:58,560 --> 00:25:00,760 Speaker 1: you know, in a in a dynamic, in a relationship 484 00:25:00,840 --> 00:25:05,919 Speaker 1: where he can't seem to find a graceful exit. And 485 00:25:06,200 --> 00:25:09,359 Speaker 1: I mean that who among us right that been there? 486 00:25:09,800 --> 00:25:12,399 Speaker 1: But it's it is this kind of you know, you 487 00:25:12,440 --> 00:25:15,800 Speaker 1: wish that that people can find an exit and and 488 00:25:15,840 --> 00:25:18,040 Speaker 1: you wish that people can kind of graduate beyond this 489 00:25:18,880 --> 00:25:21,280 Speaker 1: kind of um allowing themselves to get locked in a 490 00:25:21,359 --> 00:25:23,720 Speaker 1: dynamic like that. But I do think it is competition. 491 00:25:23,760 --> 00:25:28,199 Speaker 1: It's competitiveness. It's trying to prove to someone else that 492 00:25:28,240 --> 00:25:30,359 Speaker 1: you're the real deal. That's something builds out a lot. 493 00:25:30,480 --> 00:25:32,640 Speaker 1: And Bill will tell you he did this throughout his life. 494 00:25:32,680 --> 00:25:35,440 Speaker 1: You know, this is back in true in the eighties 495 00:25:35,560 --> 00:25:37,960 Speaker 1: when he got divorced. I was trying to date and 496 00:25:38,240 --> 00:25:41,000 Speaker 1: he always wanted to prove to the last person that 497 00:25:41,040 --> 00:25:43,680 Speaker 1: they missed out on a good deal. There's there's something 498 00:25:44,200 --> 00:25:46,520 Speaker 1: so normal about that. But at the same time, the 499 00:25:46,720 --> 00:25:51,679 Speaker 1: scale of the competition gets so mind boggling when you 500 00:25:51,680 --> 00:25:55,040 Speaker 1: start adding zeros and get to five million for one year, Like, yeah, 501 00:25:55,080 --> 00:26:00,440 Speaker 1: it absolutely becomes ridiculous. But it's those numbers are actually 502 00:26:00,480 --> 00:26:04,119 Speaker 1: meaningless to them, you know, except in a relative sentence 503 00:26:04,320 --> 00:26:06,800 Speaker 1: compared to the person that they're locked in a terrible 504 00:26:06,840 --> 00:26:10,200 Speaker 1: relationship with. You know. Yeah, I mean I've I've written 505 00:26:10,200 --> 00:26:12,240 Speaker 1: and talked about this, but like one of my favorite 506 00:26:12,240 --> 00:26:14,320 Speaker 1: things in the book is like, as like matters are 507 00:26:14,359 --> 00:26:17,920 Speaker 1: coming to a head, uh, you know, Bill Gross calls 508 00:26:17,960 --> 00:26:21,000 Speaker 1: him meeting and he like obsessively charts the seating plan 509 00:26:21,119 --> 00:26:23,320 Speaker 1: and puts like the people he's mad at like not 510 00:26:23,480 --> 00:26:26,199 Speaker 1: at the main table, and then they get all mad, 511 00:26:26,640 --> 00:26:29,080 Speaker 1: and like I love the idea that like these people 512 00:26:29,440 --> 00:26:32,280 Speaker 1: like Wright, the like number of zeros and their paycheck 513 00:26:32,320 --> 00:26:34,320 Speaker 1: has sort of lost its meaning and like they're just 514 00:26:34,440 --> 00:26:36,520 Speaker 1: they're just in the same like sort of like micro 515 00:26:36,640 --> 00:26:39,199 Speaker 1: status battles as everyone is all the time, and like 516 00:26:39,240 --> 00:26:41,080 Speaker 1: if they're not sitting at the right table, then they're 517 00:26:41,080 --> 00:26:44,360 Speaker 1: just mad, and like that's what is motivating them more 518 00:26:44,400 --> 00:26:46,639 Speaker 1: than like, you know, the hundreds of millions of dollars 519 00:26:46,720 --> 00:26:49,000 Speaker 1: they're making. Yeah, you put it um. When we had 520 00:26:49,000 --> 00:26:51,800 Speaker 1: our chat at McNally Jackson, you had a nice turn 521 00:26:51,840 --> 00:26:54,080 Speaker 1: of phrase where you were like, they just want to 522 00:26:54,119 --> 00:26:56,359 Speaker 1: be treated like adults, and they feel like they're being 523 00:26:56,359 --> 00:26:58,439 Speaker 1: treated like children. And I think that's so true, like 524 00:26:58,800 --> 00:27:02,560 Speaker 1: the degree of like child behavior among people that we 525 00:27:02,680 --> 00:27:05,239 Speaker 1: trust as fiduciaries, and not that they were like, you know, 526 00:27:05,359 --> 00:27:08,280 Speaker 1: not that that makes you godlike or beyond reproached, like 527 00:27:08,400 --> 00:27:10,720 Speaker 1: of course fiduciaries or human beings, but there is something 528 00:27:11,280 --> 00:27:15,440 Speaker 1: a little disorienting about that. There's a former Pimco manager 529 00:27:15,520 --> 00:27:18,080 Speaker 1: who messaged me right before we started this chat saying 530 00:27:18,080 --> 00:27:20,600 Speaker 1: that he literally he liked Bill Gross, but he used 531 00:27:20,640 --> 00:27:23,720 Speaker 1: to speak to him like he was a one year old. Um. 532 00:27:23,880 --> 00:27:27,359 Speaker 1: That's the way he put it, and they got on fantastically. Apparently. 533 00:27:27,680 --> 00:27:29,439 Speaker 1: I have so many guesses as to who that is, 534 00:27:29,480 --> 00:27:32,960 Speaker 1: but no, sorry, I think you probably know. But just 535 00:27:33,040 --> 00:27:36,800 Speaker 1: going back to a point that Matt made as well 536 00:27:36,840 --> 00:27:41,399 Speaker 1: about you know, Bill Gross's managerial style, this was an 537 00:27:41,440 --> 00:27:44,199 Speaker 1: option that did come up towards the end of his 538 00:27:44,280 --> 00:27:47,919 Speaker 1: tenure at PIMCO, the idea that well, maybe they remove 539 00:27:48,080 --> 00:27:51,600 Speaker 1: him from all the managerial stuff, put him even in 540 00:27:51,600 --> 00:27:54,000 Speaker 1: a different office and just give him some money and 541 00:27:54,080 --> 00:27:56,720 Speaker 1: let him invest and not have to deal with people, 542 00:27:56,720 --> 00:27:59,200 Speaker 1: because clearly he didn't like it, and he was arguably 543 00:27:59,200 --> 00:28:02,080 Speaker 1: not very good at it. Why why couldn't that happen? 544 00:28:02,119 --> 00:28:05,040 Speaker 1: Why wasn't that an option? I think by the time 545 00:28:05,040 --> 00:28:08,200 Speaker 1: that idea was being batted around, it was just too late. 546 00:28:08,400 --> 00:28:10,880 Speaker 1: Like they had had by that point a year of 547 00:28:11,040 --> 00:28:13,760 Speaker 1: trying to negotiate an exit for Bill and trying to 548 00:28:13,800 --> 00:28:16,359 Speaker 1: figure out the best path forward, and it seems like 549 00:28:16,400 --> 00:28:18,480 Speaker 1: they were just so out of step with each other. 550 00:28:18,560 --> 00:28:20,120 Speaker 1: And by day I mean Bill Gross and the rest 551 00:28:20,160 --> 00:28:22,879 Speaker 1: of him Coast Management, where Bill would come to the 552 00:28:22,880 --> 00:28:24,680 Speaker 1: table and say, hey, I'm ready to step back. Let's 553 00:28:24,680 --> 00:28:26,280 Speaker 1: do this and this and this, and they would say, 554 00:28:26,280 --> 00:28:28,760 Speaker 1: oh great, when can we do it? And then you know, 555 00:28:28,880 --> 00:28:31,480 Speaker 1: he would, according to you know, my sources, that he 556 00:28:31,480 --> 00:28:32,879 Speaker 1: would flip flap and say, oh, no, I don't I 557 00:28:32,880 --> 00:28:35,960 Speaker 1: don't want that. I never wanted that. And this happened 558 00:28:35,960 --> 00:28:38,040 Speaker 1: in a bunch of different kind of iterations and in 559 00:28:38,080 --> 00:28:41,520 Speaker 1: different ways, and um, you know, One example that's a 560 00:28:41,520 --> 00:28:45,120 Speaker 1: little bit famous um among people that I talked to 561 00:28:45,160 --> 00:28:48,120 Speaker 1: you is the time when he agreed to meet with 562 00:28:48,200 --> 00:28:51,959 Speaker 1: a mediator for his relationship with Mohammed Hilarian, and basically 563 00:28:52,480 --> 00:28:55,600 Speaker 1: he everyone says, oh, Bill agreed to this. Okay, fine, 564 00:28:55,600 --> 00:28:57,840 Speaker 1: we're going to schedule this. They found a mediator, they 565 00:28:57,880 --> 00:28:59,640 Speaker 1: started to put it on the calendars, and Bill was like, 566 00:28:59,840 --> 00:29:02,960 Speaker 1: I never agree to this. And Bill says, you know, 567 00:29:02,960 --> 00:29:04,680 Speaker 1: people hear what they want. But I truly he to 568 00:29:04,800 --> 00:29:07,080 Speaker 1: this day maintains that he never agreed to it. And 569 00:29:07,120 --> 00:29:08,760 Speaker 1: I agree with him that people hear what they want. 570 00:29:08,880 --> 00:29:11,400 Speaker 1: But there is this sense of like, okay, but eight 571 00:29:11,440 --> 00:29:14,160 Speaker 1: people heard you say yes to this and wrote it down, 572 00:29:14,360 --> 00:29:16,800 Speaker 1: and you know, at a certain point we have to 573 00:29:16,840 --> 00:29:19,600 Speaker 1: try to move forward. By the time, the idea was 574 00:29:19,640 --> 00:29:21,520 Speaker 1: being batted around that they could maybe just give him 575 00:29:21,520 --> 00:29:23,600 Speaker 1: a pile of money, a little side car as they 576 00:29:23,600 --> 00:29:25,880 Speaker 1: called it, and let him just play with the money, 577 00:29:25,960 --> 00:29:27,880 Speaker 1: play in the market, be happy be over there and 578 00:29:27,880 --> 00:29:31,600 Speaker 1: not bothering anybody his It was almost as though, I 579 00:29:31,600 --> 00:29:33,640 Speaker 1: think this is kind of his characterization, but it's almost 580 00:29:33,680 --> 00:29:35,920 Speaker 1: as though his presence was just too toxic, that there 581 00:29:35,960 --> 00:29:37,720 Speaker 1: was too upsetting to even have him in the building, 582 00:29:37,760 --> 00:29:40,880 Speaker 1: but basically that they couldn't. They couldn't. They felt like 583 00:29:40,880 --> 00:29:43,200 Speaker 1: they couldn't trust him anymore to agree to this plan 584 00:29:43,240 --> 00:29:45,800 Speaker 1: and stick to it and carry it out, that it 585 00:29:45,840 --> 00:29:48,520 Speaker 1: would still be more drama, more chaos, more moving the 586 00:29:48,560 --> 00:29:51,160 Speaker 1: goal post. One implication of the book is that although 587 00:29:51,160 --> 00:29:54,040 Speaker 1: he was not the CEO, he was to such a 588 00:29:54,120 --> 00:29:56,680 Speaker 1: degree the star performer that he could he like had 589 00:29:56,720 --> 00:29:59,560 Speaker 1: the soft power anyway. Like at some point he tells Larya, 590 00:29:59,640 --> 00:30:03,800 Speaker 1: I'm gretariat. You don't bet agan secretary. It's interesting because 591 00:30:03,800 --> 00:30:05,640 Speaker 1: in the beginning, you know, they made such a big 592 00:30:05,680 --> 00:30:08,080 Speaker 1: deal about the three legged stool of the co founders 593 00:30:08,080 --> 00:30:10,680 Speaker 1: being equal, but the two other co founders kind of 594 00:30:10,680 --> 00:30:14,040 Speaker 1: fell away and only Bill was left. And there seems 595 00:30:14,080 --> 00:30:16,520 Speaker 1: to be this kind of institutional slap where the portfolio 596 00:30:16,560 --> 00:30:19,360 Speaker 1: managers are the most important, where you know, if you're 597 00:30:19,360 --> 00:30:22,120 Speaker 1: a client person, you serve the portfolio manager. If you're execution, 598 00:30:22,320 --> 00:30:26,840 Speaker 1: everything revolves around the performer. So I'm not sure you 599 00:30:26,880 --> 00:30:28,680 Speaker 1: know what it does sound like everyone was a bit 600 00:30:28,680 --> 00:30:31,440 Speaker 1: more collegial back in the day. I mean, still with 601 00:30:31,480 --> 00:30:34,320 Speaker 1: the same kind of um joking that I don't think 602 00:30:34,320 --> 00:30:37,960 Speaker 1: I would be able to tolerate. But they but I'm 603 00:30:38,000 --> 00:30:40,400 Speaker 1: not sure. You know, it seems like towards the end, Yeah, 604 00:30:40,400 --> 00:30:43,520 Speaker 1: there was this extreme tilt that that made him the 605 00:30:43,640 --> 00:30:45,400 Speaker 1: leader and made people want to be like him and 606 00:30:45,440 --> 00:30:47,680 Speaker 1: act like him. And certainly he's at the tone. You know, 607 00:30:47,800 --> 00:30:49,800 Speaker 1: you can't if Bill gros says no noise on the 608 00:30:49,800 --> 00:30:51,360 Speaker 1: trade floor, there's going to be no noise on the 609 00:30:51,360 --> 00:30:54,520 Speaker 1: trade floor. Do you think that's true? Like elsewhere in 610 00:30:54,520 --> 00:30:58,480 Speaker 1: the financial industry, Like, like it seems so like ingrained 611 00:30:58,600 --> 00:31:01,880 Speaker 1: that the person running the money and making the investment 612 00:31:01,920 --> 00:31:04,239 Speaker 1: decisions is the most important person and the person like 613 00:31:04,600 --> 00:31:10,320 Speaker 1: during investor relations or like managing HR is subservient to them. 614 00:31:10,360 --> 00:31:13,760 Speaker 1: But like, is that is that how it works everywhere? 615 00:31:13,800 --> 00:31:16,840 Speaker 1: Because like you know, I go back to like Philip 616 00:31:16,840 --> 00:31:20,120 Speaker 1: gross is at performed by fifty basis points, right, Like meanwhile, 617 00:31:20,120 --> 00:31:23,040 Speaker 1: people are raising trillions of dollars, right, Like like maybe 618 00:31:23,040 --> 00:31:26,080 Speaker 1: those people raising trillions of dollars were actually quite good 619 00:31:26,080 --> 00:31:28,320 Speaker 1: at their jobs. No, I think you're exactly right, And 620 00:31:28,360 --> 00:31:29,840 Speaker 1: I think this is sort of like a there and 621 00:31:29,840 --> 00:31:32,120 Speaker 1: there are other like you know, big financial instititions, or 622 00:31:32,160 --> 00:31:34,000 Speaker 1: I'd be like, yeah, the investor remissions. People there are 623 00:31:34,040 --> 00:31:36,920 Speaker 1: really important completely given the perform I are people and 624 00:31:36,960 --> 00:31:38,840 Speaker 1: bad I are people. I think that's completely true, and 625 00:31:38,880 --> 00:31:42,680 Speaker 1: that's underappreciated. And I have some views on this given 626 00:31:42,760 --> 00:31:44,840 Speaker 1: that that's typically where you would find women in the 627 00:31:44,880 --> 00:31:48,560 Speaker 1: financial industry. Um, you know, for for many reasons as 628 00:31:48,560 --> 00:31:50,720 Speaker 1: to why that has turned out to be the case, 629 00:31:50,760 --> 00:31:52,440 Speaker 1: and for you know, and I think that also kind 630 00:31:52,440 --> 00:31:54,720 Speaker 1: of feeds why we think of it as I don't know, 631 00:31:54,880 --> 00:31:56,920 Speaker 1: it's kind of a chicken and egg problem. But I 632 00:31:56,960 --> 00:32:00,280 Speaker 1: have this argument that um, Pat Fisher should be you know, 633 00:32:00,360 --> 00:32:02,719 Speaker 1: this is a woman who ran operations at PIMCO. And 634 00:32:02,760 --> 00:32:05,760 Speaker 1: I strongly believe this is just me. No one has 635 00:32:05,920 --> 00:32:07,240 Speaker 1: you know, no one else is making this case but 636 00:32:07,280 --> 00:32:09,960 Speaker 1: me probably, But I shouldn't say that. Maybe some someone 637 00:32:10,000 --> 00:32:11,800 Speaker 1: out there is making the case. But I have this 638 00:32:11,840 --> 00:32:14,480 Speaker 1: strong belief that Pat Fisher should be counted as a 639 00:32:14,520 --> 00:32:17,360 Speaker 1: co founder. She ran operations at PIMCO. And I was 640 00:32:17,400 --> 00:32:19,000 Speaker 1: just talking to a guy who used to work there, 641 00:32:19,040 --> 00:32:21,360 Speaker 1: who you know, doesn't know this theory of mine, but 642 00:32:21,400 --> 00:32:23,680 Speaker 1: he was like, yeah, you know, PIMCO was so strong 643 00:32:23,720 --> 00:32:27,720 Speaker 1: in operations and trade execution, and just if you're botching 644 00:32:27,760 --> 00:32:30,080 Speaker 1: every third trade and calling Goldman and saying, shoot, I'm 645 00:32:30,120 --> 00:32:33,440 Speaker 1: so sorry, do you mind Goldman's gonna not look to 646 00:32:33,520 --> 00:32:35,560 Speaker 1: your trades that you know, they're gonna stop trading with 647 00:32:35,560 --> 00:32:37,360 Speaker 1: you as much they're this person doesn't know what they're doing. 648 00:32:37,720 --> 00:32:40,320 Speaker 1: And PIMCO wasn't that and that you know, there are 649 00:32:40,360 --> 00:32:42,080 Speaker 1: a hundred different times that I do this in the book. 650 00:32:42,120 --> 00:32:44,800 Speaker 1: But Pat Fisher helped to build the thing that made 651 00:32:44,800 --> 00:32:47,760 Speaker 1: the company run seamlessly, and that is so underappreciated because 652 00:32:47,760 --> 00:32:50,760 Speaker 1: it's back office. And again, I think there's some sexism 653 00:32:50,800 --> 00:32:53,480 Speaker 1: in there, and um, you know, we we've built a 654 00:32:53,520 --> 00:32:56,760 Speaker 1: world in which there's this like hegemony of um of 655 00:32:56,840 --> 00:32:59,880 Speaker 1: portfolio managing or like you know, in the book, there's 656 00:32:59,920 --> 00:33:02,520 Speaker 1: the scene where Bill Grows blows up at the woman 657 00:33:02,560 --> 00:33:05,800 Speaker 1: who runs product and says, you're introducing products at the 658 00:33:05,800 --> 00:33:08,520 Speaker 1: portfolio managers didn't approve and she's like, that's actually not true. 659 00:33:08,960 --> 00:33:12,440 Speaker 1: But like you know, when I think about giant financial, 660 00:33:12,640 --> 00:33:15,200 Speaker 1: like like giant asset managers, like I think more about 661 00:33:15,240 --> 00:33:18,160 Speaker 1: product than about portfolio management, right, I think, like you know, 662 00:33:18,200 --> 00:33:20,920 Speaker 1: the person is like, we've introduced a meme themed e 663 00:33:21,040 --> 00:33:23,680 Speaker 1: TF like that's how they get the money it's not 664 00:33:23,760 --> 00:33:26,320 Speaker 1: by like outperforming by ten basis points. And I'm sure 665 00:33:26,320 --> 00:33:28,880 Speaker 1: I'm exaggerating here, but like that job of like figuring 666 00:33:28,920 --> 00:33:31,600 Speaker 1: out like what sort of rapper people want things in 667 00:33:32,240 --> 00:33:35,440 Speaker 1: seems like at least as important as like at performing 668 00:33:35,520 --> 00:33:39,800 Speaker 1: se of like other you know, investment grade bond managers. 669 00:33:40,720 --> 00:33:43,320 Speaker 1: I think that's true because if you look back, you know, 670 00:33:43,600 --> 00:33:46,080 Speaker 1: at products that they were selling in like the forties, 671 00:33:46,120 --> 00:33:48,480 Speaker 1: they're not that different, like everything is the same. In 672 00:33:48,480 --> 00:33:50,200 Speaker 1: the process of reporting this book, I talked to a 673 00:33:50,200 --> 00:33:52,120 Speaker 1: pension manager who had overseen the A T and T 674 00:33:52,640 --> 00:33:54,840 Speaker 1: pension fund and he was like, yeah, you know, we 675 00:33:54,840 --> 00:33:56,880 Speaker 1: were remember being a helicopter like looking at a mall 676 00:33:56,920 --> 00:33:58,600 Speaker 1: that we were thinking about buying. And then I had 677 00:33:58,600 --> 00:34:00,840 Speaker 1: a passive strategy and I was like weak, what you 678 00:34:00,840 --> 00:34:03,120 Speaker 1: were doing a barbell in the seventies? Like where was 679 00:34:03,160 --> 00:34:05,080 Speaker 1: I on this? I just wrote this article about how 680 00:34:05,120 --> 00:34:06,560 Speaker 1: people are doing a barbell and it was like a 681 00:34:06,560 --> 00:34:09,000 Speaker 1: new thing to me, Like I did I just wake up? 682 00:34:09,080 --> 00:34:10,919 Speaker 1: Have people been doing this the whole time? And yes, 683 00:34:11,520 --> 00:34:13,399 Speaker 1: like this is we we put new names on them, 684 00:34:13,440 --> 00:34:16,400 Speaker 1: we find more tax efficient strategies or whatever. But to 685 00:34:16,440 --> 00:34:19,719 Speaker 1: a large extent, it's the same stuff repackaged, and you know, 686 00:34:19,840 --> 00:34:22,760 Speaker 1: as a person picking funds, you're kind of like, I'm clever. 687 00:34:23,040 --> 00:34:24,680 Speaker 1: I want to pick the thing that's cool right now. 688 00:34:24,719 --> 00:34:40,160 Speaker 1: I love a meme. Let's do this. You know what 689 00:34:40,320 --> 00:34:44,399 Speaker 1: is PIMCO like right now? Because of course they had 690 00:34:44,440 --> 00:34:48,880 Speaker 1: this exodus in they lost um. I think one of 691 00:34:48,880 --> 00:34:53,560 Speaker 1: their few senior women they lost were their few senior 692 00:34:54,120 --> 00:34:58,160 Speaker 1: persons of color, in the form of Muhammad l arian Um. Clearly, 693 00:34:58,480 --> 00:35:01,439 Speaker 1: Bill Gross's focus was on the total return fund and 694 00:35:01,520 --> 00:35:04,799 Speaker 1: what was going on with his portfolio management. But as 695 00:35:04,840 --> 00:35:07,360 Speaker 1: you and Matt just laid it out, products were becoming 696 00:35:07,400 --> 00:35:10,399 Speaker 1: more and more important. Um. There was more and more 697 00:35:10,600 --> 00:35:14,080 Speaker 1: of a tilt towards getting even more passive as low 698 00:35:14,120 --> 00:35:20,520 Speaker 1: cost as physically possible. Has PIMCO changed much, I'm sorry 699 00:35:20,560 --> 00:35:23,520 Speaker 1: to report that I don't think they've changed much. I 700 00:35:23,560 --> 00:35:26,040 Speaker 1: don't think it's um. You know, I think they are 701 00:35:26,080 --> 00:35:28,200 Speaker 1: working on it, much like a lot of you know, 702 00:35:28,239 --> 00:35:32,439 Speaker 1: asset managers financial firms are trying to figure out what's 703 00:35:32,480 --> 00:35:35,560 Speaker 1: gone so awry and why they simply have so few 704 00:35:35,560 --> 00:35:38,319 Speaker 1: women and people of color like so weird. From what 705 00:35:38,440 --> 00:35:42,239 Speaker 1: I'm hearing, it's it's not really going swimmingly. I think 706 00:35:42,239 --> 00:35:44,520 Speaker 1: it was last year that there was a letter from 707 00:35:44,640 --> 00:35:47,520 Speaker 1: twenty one current and former female employees saying, you know, 708 00:35:47,640 --> 00:35:51,759 Speaker 1: this is a we've experienced discrimination here at PIMCO. And 709 00:35:51,880 --> 00:35:54,319 Speaker 1: I think at the beginning of Pimco had never had 710 00:35:54,360 --> 00:35:56,920 Speaker 1: a black partner, never not one. They just simply couldn't 711 00:35:56,960 --> 00:36:01,239 Speaker 1: find one. And I just find that be on disappointing, right, 712 00:36:01,239 --> 00:36:05,160 Speaker 1: Like if it's so troubling because if you think through 713 00:36:05,880 --> 00:36:08,320 Speaker 1: what you know, they think it's a meritocracy, So what 714 00:36:08,400 --> 00:36:10,719 Speaker 1: does that mean, Like if you take that further, if 715 00:36:10,719 --> 00:36:13,680 Speaker 1: you go to the like logical extension of that, I 716 00:36:14,480 --> 00:36:19,000 Speaker 1: just it's indefensible. And I don't think. I don't know. 717 00:36:19,040 --> 00:36:21,520 Speaker 1: I think there's this kind of obviously we're having a 718 00:36:21,560 --> 00:36:25,359 Speaker 1: broad you know, pan industry reckoning with what we do 719 00:36:25,400 --> 00:36:27,000 Speaker 1: at work and how we feel about work and what 720 00:36:27,040 --> 00:36:29,680 Speaker 1: we bring to work and you know, what's allowed at work. 721 00:36:29,880 --> 00:36:33,080 Speaker 1: And I think that's especially acute at a place like Pimco. 722 00:36:33,120 --> 00:36:37,680 Speaker 1: At Pimco because those old school Wall Street cultures that 723 00:36:38,360 --> 00:36:42,799 Speaker 1: are so tough and so exclusionary are they just look 724 00:36:42,840 --> 00:36:45,200 Speaker 1: real bad right now. And to a large extent, I 725 00:36:45,239 --> 00:36:48,759 Speaker 1: think it's just not tenable anymore. Meanwhile, Bill Gross has 726 00:36:48,760 --> 00:36:55,600 Speaker 1: a book out. He's keeping busy beautiful, right, He's he's 727 00:36:55,600 --> 00:36:57,960 Speaker 1: he's got a book, got a suspended jail sentence for 728 00:36:57,960 --> 00:37:01,400 Speaker 1: playing the Gilgan's Island theme too long? Has he like 729 00:37:01,480 --> 00:37:03,920 Speaker 1: what is he having a reckoning with any of this? Like? 730 00:37:04,080 --> 00:37:07,000 Speaker 1: Is he do you think he's been into respective about 731 00:37:07,040 --> 00:37:10,719 Speaker 1: like the the last few years and and and uh 732 00:37:10,880 --> 00:37:14,640 Speaker 1: and about your book. Uh, it's funny. Yesterday I had 733 00:37:14,640 --> 00:37:19,480 Speaker 1: my first interaction with Bill in over a year. I 734 00:37:19,480 --> 00:37:21,960 Speaker 1: had tweeted the Planet Money story that we did Planet 735 00:37:21,960 --> 00:37:24,879 Speaker 1: Money episode that we did about you know, the Mond King, 736 00:37:25,280 --> 00:37:27,120 Speaker 1: and he replied to my tweet with a link to 737 00:37:27,160 --> 00:37:31,360 Speaker 1: his book, which is just stellar marketing, um and and 738 00:37:31,480 --> 00:37:34,680 Speaker 1: so on brand. But I do think so it's interesting. 739 00:37:34,800 --> 00:37:36,600 Speaker 1: I have always kind of thought of him as a 740 00:37:36,640 --> 00:37:39,920 Speaker 1: reflective person, as introspective, as a bit self aware, you know, 741 00:37:40,040 --> 00:37:42,640 Speaker 1: to a point among us. But I was talking to 742 00:37:42,680 --> 00:37:45,480 Speaker 1: a colleague who covered treasuries for ages, and he was 743 00:37:45,520 --> 00:37:49,439 Speaker 1: saying that it was a performative self reflection or self 744 00:37:49,480 --> 00:37:53,480 Speaker 1: awareness that actually Bill is It's part of that facade, 745 00:37:53,560 --> 00:37:56,040 Speaker 1: that persona that he would put on. But actually there 746 00:37:56,080 --> 00:38:00,080 Speaker 1: there isn't that much real soul searching, which I don't know. 747 00:38:00,360 --> 00:38:01,960 Speaker 1: I mean, he's been, you know, in his book, he 748 00:38:01,960 --> 00:38:04,520 Speaker 1: he talks about his ouster. In you know, a recent 749 00:38:04,760 --> 00:38:06,920 Speaker 1: interview with the FT, he talked about his auster and 750 00:38:07,239 --> 00:38:09,520 Speaker 1: what he did wrong, and he definitely has thoughts. So 751 00:38:09,600 --> 00:38:12,239 Speaker 1: it's hard to It's hard for me to gauge how 752 00:38:12,320 --> 00:38:15,040 Speaker 1: much of that is truly internalized and like from the heart. 753 00:38:15,560 --> 00:38:19,120 Speaker 1: But he does seem to find fault with his behavior 754 00:38:19,280 --> 00:38:21,279 Speaker 1: and that he you know, thinks he maybe should have 755 00:38:21,320 --> 00:38:25,960 Speaker 1: done things differently, which probably we can all agree. But yeah, 756 00:38:26,239 --> 00:38:27,799 Speaker 1: I don't know. He's been busy. He's been, you know, 757 00:38:28,000 --> 00:38:31,320 Speaker 1: feuding with his neighbor, writing this book um publishing it 758 00:38:31,360 --> 00:38:36,880 Speaker 1: two weeks before mine, and applying to tweets. What do 759 00:38:36,920 --> 00:38:40,839 Speaker 1: you think Bill Gross's legacy in terms of the bond 760 00:38:40,880 --> 00:38:47,520 Speaker 1: market or investing actually is mm hmm two answers. From 761 00:38:47,560 --> 00:38:50,600 Speaker 1: a pure investing standpoint, I think it is seeing these 762 00:38:50,680 --> 00:38:53,799 Speaker 1: market inefficiencies, these factors that he identified and was able 763 00:38:53,880 --> 00:38:58,359 Speaker 1: to ring out performance from for decades, So those were 764 00:38:58,360 --> 00:39:00,360 Speaker 1: true insights, and I do think that that is, you know, 765 00:39:00,440 --> 00:39:03,680 Speaker 1: he is the bond king in that way, and and 766 00:39:03,760 --> 00:39:06,280 Speaker 1: helped to bring about this revolution. Of active bond trading. 767 00:39:07,239 --> 00:39:11,640 Speaker 1: And then the second answer would be kind of it's 768 00:39:11,640 --> 00:39:14,120 Speaker 1: hard to say, and if if a world without Bill 769 00:39:14,120 --> 00:39:18,439 Speaker 1: Gross would have the same cultural shape, that the bond 770 00:39:18,520 --> 00:39:20,239 Speaker 1: market would look the way it does, and then that 771 00:39:20,280 --> 00:39:22,160 Speaker 1: everyone would act the way they do in the bond market. 772 00:39:22,200 --> 00:39:24,759 Speaker 1: You know, PIMCO is is certainly on the sort of 773 00:39:24,760 --> 00:39:26,759 Speaker 1: extreme of behavior where they're harder on the street than 774 00:39:26,760 --> 00:39:30,280 Speaker 1: everyone else. They're cut throat, they're a little meaner there whatever, um, 775 00:39:30,360 --> 00:39:34,919 Speaker 1: but and it's I don't know that everyone like necessarily 776 00:39:35,360 --> 00:39:37,000 Speaker 1: is quite as a serbic in dealing with their Wall 777 00:39:37,040 --> 00:39:39,000 Speaker 1: Street coverage. But I do think that it was a model. 778 00:39:39,080 --> 00:39:40,879 Speaker 1: It was a way, you know, people look to him 779 00:39:40,880 --> 00:39:42,800 Speaker 1: as a role model that he's like on TV talking 780 00:39:42,800 --> 00:39:45,960 Speaker 1: about his securities and talking his book, and people are like, 781 00:39:45,960 --> 00:39:50,000 Speaker 1: that is so cool, that's amazing that he can do that. 782 00:39:50,080 --> 00:39:52,640 Speaker 1: The beach does something and everybody follows, And that was 783 00:39:52,680 --> 00:39:56,200 Speaker 1: absolutely you know that that degree of influence was certainly 784 00:39:56,480 --> 00:40:28,000 Speaker 1: widely admired and emulated, you know, aspired aspirationally emulated. Mary Child, 785 00:40:28,160 --> 00:40:30,960 Speaker 1: thank you so much. The book again is The Bond King. 786 00:40:31,040 --> 00:40:33,440 Speaker 1: How one man made a market, built an empire, and 787 00:40:33,680 --> 00:40:36,120 Speaker 1: lost it. All and you should definitely check it out. 788 00:40:36,480 --> 00:40:39,239 Speaker 1: This was so fun. So Matt, obviously that was a 789 00:40:39,280 --> 00:40:42,640 Speaker 1: fun conversation. And I know you've been sort of involved 790 00:40:42,680 --> 00:40:45,239 Speaker 1: in the production of this book and acting as an 791 00:40:45,440 --> 00:40:49,520 Speaker 1: advisor on a lot of um the content, and just 792 00:40:49,960 --> 00:40:53,560 Speaker 1: I guess providing emotional support to Mary because it sounds like, 793 00:40:53,719 --> 00:40:57,279 Speaker 1: um she needed a lot of it given the personalities involved. 794 00:40:57,800 --> 00:40:59,680 Speaker 1: But one of the things that I find really interesting 795 00:40:59,680 --> 00:41:02,680 Speaker 1: about at well, one of the things I keep thinking 796 00:41:02,880 --> 00:41:05,640 Speaker 1: is that Bill Gross was sort of born out of 797 00:41:05,840 --> 00:41:08,719 Speaker 1: the nineteen seventies early eighties when you finally got a 798 00:41:08,719 --> 00:41:12,440 Speaker 1: lot of interest rate volatility, which made bonds more interesting 799 00:41:12,680 --> 00:41:16,359 Speaker 1: and then which gave rise to bond kings like him 800 00:41:16,480 --> 00:41:19,080 Speaker 1: and a few others. And I kind of wonder if 801 00:41:19,840 --> 00:41:23,239 Speaker 1: the period that we're entering now, if we're going to 802 00:41:23,280 --> 00:41:25,760 Speaker 1: see the same sort of birth of a new asset 803 00:41:25,840 --> 00:41:29,000 Speaker 1: class or a new group of investors with a slightly 804 00:41:29,000 --> 00:41:33,040 Speaker 1: different strategy who come out of it really successful. Yeah, 805 00:41:33,120 --> 00:41:35,120 Speaker 1: I think that's possible. I do think that one thing 806 00:41:35,120 --> 00:41:38,120 Speaker 1: that that is true about Bill Gross is that he 807 00:41:38,239 --> 00:41:40,640 Speaker 1: came up at a time when it was sort of 808 00:41:40,680 --> 00:41:43,600 Speaker 1: hard to be a famous investor, and he ended up 809 00:41:43,680 --> 00:41:46,040 Speaker 1: running like a like a mutual fund, which was sort 810 00:41:46,080 --> 00:41:48,680 Speaker 1: of how you became a famous investor in like the 811 00:41:48,680 --> 00:41:52,600 Speaker 1: seventies and eighties. And you know, like, certainly there's a 812 00:41:52,600 --> 00:41:54,160 Speaker 1: lot of volatility in two thousand and eight, and the 813 00:41:54,160 --> 00:41:56,640 Speaker 1: people who became famous out of that were hedgemine managers. 814 00:41:56,680 --> 00:41:58,960 Speaker 1: And I feel like that's where the where the action 815 00:41:59,080 --> 00:42:01,520 Speaker 1: is for the foreseeable future is like people who can 816 00:42:01,600 --> 00:42:05,520 Speaker 1: make really kind of bold, concentrated bets rather than running 817 00:42:05,920 --> 00:42:09,680 Speaker 1: you know, trillions of dollars for like households intentions. It 818 00:42:09,719 --> 00:42:11,920 Speaker 1: feels like that's where like the celebrities are meant to 819 00:42:11,960 --> 00:42:14,960 Speaker 1: these days. Yeah, I can't imagine that going back, you know, 820 00:42:15,160 --> 00:42:17,600 Speaker 1: but certainly there will be celebrities meanted out of this, 821 00:42:17,719 --> 00:42:20,880 Speaker 1: you know, out of out of unit today's volatility. Yeah, 822 00:42:21,040 --> 00:42:24,320 Speaker 1: but probably not your average et F manager or something 823 00:42:24,400 --> 00:42:26,480 Speaker 1: like that. But that was the other thing that I 824 00:42:26,520 --> 00:42:29,239 Speaker 1: was thinking about, was this idea of whether or not 825 00:42:29,400 --> 00:42:33,360 Speaker 1: the way Bill Gross ran a bond fund was the 826 00:42:33,400 --> 00:42:35,879 Speaker 1: sort of gold standard of running a bond fund because 827 00:42:35,880 --> 00:42:39,080 Speaker 1: when you listen to Mary talk and describe you know, 828 00:42:39,160 --> 00:42:43,440 Speaker 1: his strategy or the secrets of Pimco's success going along 829 00:42:43,480 --> 00:42:50,240 Speaker 1: credit buying duration, selling volatility, treating Russian forwards as cash equivalents. 830 00:42:50,640 --> 00:42:53,719 Speaker 1: I mean, if you think about someone doing that over 831 00:42:53,760 --> 00:42:57,000 Speaker 1: the past month or two, it's just a recipe for disaster. 832 00:42:57,200 --> 00:42:59,759 Speaker 1: And so you get that question once again whether or 833 00:42:59,800 --> 00:43:03,680 Speaker 1: not uh Bill Gross was lucky that his period of 834 00:43:03,719 --> 00:43:06,719 Speaker 1: being at the helm of a very large investor coincided 835 00:43:06,800 --> 00:43:10,520 Speaker 1: with very low interest rates in a period of generally 836 00:43:10,560 --> 00:43:14,279 Speaker 1: low volatility, or whether there was something else there. Yeah, 837 00:43:14,320 --> 00:43:16,120 Speaker 1: But it's hard to know because like it's not like 838 00:43:16,280 --> 00:43:18,719 Speaker 1: it's not like he was born to sell volatility. It's 839 00:43:18,719 --> 00:43:20,920 Speaker 1: like he came to a reason to complete identified the 840 00:43:21,560 --> 00:43:24,000 Speaker 1: right for that environment, you know, and like he's he 841 00:43:24,040 --> 00:43:26,080 Speaker 1: wrote not ites saying like this is how we expect 842 00:43:26,080 --> 00:43:27,600 Speaker 1: the next ten years to go, and so this is 843 00:43:27,600 --> 00:43:31,359 Speaker 1: why we're going to be structurally short volatility. And he 844 00:43:31,440 --> 00:43:34,359 Speaker 1: was somewhat able to adapt, right. I mean, he ended 845 00:43:34,440 --> 00:43:37,000 Speaker 1: up not doing as well in in a in a 846 00:43:37,080 --> 00:43:40,480 Speaker 1: higher rate, you know, sort of different environment than he 847 00:43:40,520 --> 00:43:42,760 Speaker 1: did during like the sort of long bond bull market. 848 00:43:43,200 --> 00:43:45,320 Speaker 1: But it's not like he just sort of said it 849 00:43:45,360 --> 00:43:47,799 Speaker 1: on autopilot for thirty years that had happened to work out, 850 00:43:48,840 --> 00:43:51,839 Speaker 1: That's true. This has been another episode of the All 851 00:43:51,920 --> 00:43:54,719 Speaker 1: Thoughts podcast. I'm Tracy Alloway. You can follow me on 852 00:43:54,760 --> 00:43:58,080 Speaker 1: Twitter at Tracy Alloway. You should definitely follow our guest 853 00:43:58,320 --> 00:44:02,319 Speaker 1: Mary Child's She's at m d C, and you should 854 00:44:02,320 --> 00:44:07,480 Speaker 1: follow Matt Levine. He's at Matt Underscore Levine. You should 855 00:44:07,520 --> 00:44:12,720 Speaker 1: also follow our producer Carmen Rodriguez, She's at Carmen Armant. 856 00:44:13,200 --> 00:44:17,319 Speaker 1: And you should follow Bloomberg Podcast at Podcasts and the 857 00:44:17,320 --> 00:44:21,480 Speaker 1: head of Bloomberg Podcast, Francesco Leedy at Francesco Today. Thanks 858 00:44:21,480 --> 00:44:22,000 Speaker 1: for listening.