1
00:00:00,040 --> 00:00:10,600
Speaker 1: Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio News.

2
00:00:11,560 --> 00:00:14,840
Speaker 2: Welcome to the Daybreak Asia podcast. I'm Doug Krisner. Today

3
00:00:14,840 --> 00:00:18,400
Speaker 2: it's all about earnings. First, in Seoul, Samsung's chip unit

4
00:00:18,520 --> 00:00:21,919
Speaker 2: reported a profit increase of more than fivefold for the

5
00:00:22,079 --> 00:00:26,800
Speaker 2: December quarter, given that robust demand from memory for artificial intelligence,

6
00:00:27,160 --> 00:00:29,560
Speaker 2: and at the same time, Samsung announced a two and

7
00:00:29,560 --> 00:00:33,080
Speaker 2: a half billion dollar stock buyback. In the States, meantime,

8
00:00:33,120 --> 00:00:35,960
Speaker 2: there were a number of key earnings after the US close.

9
00:00:36,320 --> 00:00:39,279
Speaker 2: We heard from Microsoft to Meta as well as IBM,

10
00:00:39,520 --> 00:00:42,279
Speaker 2: along with Tesla. Joining us now for a closer look

11
00:00:42,440 --> 00:00:45,680
Speaker 2: is Daniel Newman. He is the CEO of Futurum Group.

12
00:00:46,040 --> 00:00:48,880
Speaker 2: Thank you so much for being here. Let's start with Microsoft.

13
00:00:49,320 --> 00:00:53,080
Speaker 2: The earnings and revenue for the latest quarter were above estimates. However,

14
00:00:53,600 --> 00:00:58,320
Speaker 2: Microsoft's cloud sales growth seemed to slow and CAPEX spending

15
00:00:58,400 --> 00:01:00,640
Speaker 2: hit a record, so the stock was down quite a

16
00:01:00,640 --> 00:01:03,520
Speaker 2: bit in late trading, around five percent. How do you

17
00:01:03,560 --> 00:01:06,039
Speaker 2: read this price action? What is it telling us?

18
00:01:06,800 --> 00:01:09,480
Speaker 3: Yeah, first of all, it was a pretty good quarter.

19
00:01:09,600 --> 00:01:11,760
Speaker 4: So when you see it fall six percent or so

20
00:01:11,840 --> 00:01:14,360
Speaker 4: after hours, you definitely have to, you know, raise an

21
00:01:14,360 --> 00:01:18,360
Speaker 4: eyebrown and say, what's happening, I actually think the thing

22
00:01:18,480 --> 00:01:21,959
Speaker 4: that spooking investors has more to do with the large

23
00:01:22,000 --> 00:01:24,840
Speaker 4: backlog that was shared by cfo Amy Hood. I think

24
00:01:24,840 --> 00:01:26,760
Speaker 4: it's about six hundred and twenty billion, which is a

25
00:01:26,800 --> 00:01:29,160
Speaker 4: massive number. But if you remember when Oracle did a

26
00:01:29,160 --> 00:01:32,679
Speaker 4: similar thing, shared its big backlog, there's a common denominator

27
00:01:32,680 --> 00:01:35,839
Speaker 4: here and that's open Ai. So while Microsoft is having

28
00:01:36,160 --> 00:01:40,320
Speaker 4: tremendous growth record results and by the way, I think

29
00:01:40,360 --> 00:01:42,959
Speaker 4: the cloud myths that everyone keeps talking about at thirty

30
00:01:43,040 --> 00:01:46,920
Speaker 4: nine percent azure growth against a forty percent a quarter ago,

31
00:01:47,280 --> 00:01:51,080
Speaker 4: so this is minuscule in terms of a miss still

32
00:01:51,160 --> 00:01:56,120
Speaker 4: really strong momentum, but that open ai commitment and the

33
00:01:56,200 --> 00:02:00,480
Speaker 4: relationship between Microsoft Open Ai, and basically right now everything

34
00:02:00,520 --> 00:02:03,520
Speaker 4: that open ai is touching feels a little bit toxic.

35
00:02:03,920 --> 00:02:06,240
Speaker 4: So all the companies that are in the kind of

36
00:02:06,280 --> 00:02:10,520
Speaker 4: ecosystem of Sam Altman's trillions of dollars of committed compute

37
00:02:10,520 --> 00:02:14,600
Speaker 4: spend seem to be penalized because there's a lack of

38
00:02:14,639 --> 00:02:17,440
Speaker 4: confidence in the market as to whether or not SAM

39
00:02:17,480 --> 00:02:19,280
Speaker 4: and open a are going to be able to execute.

40
00:02:19,360 --> 00:02:22,000
Speaker 4: So while some people are pointing to cloud, some people

41
00:02:22,080 --> 00:02:24,680
Speaker 4: are pointing to the CAPEC spending.

42
00:02:25,360 --> 00:02:26,440
Speaker 3: I see it a little differently.

43
00:02:26,520 --> 00:02:28,560
Speaker 4: I think people are a little nervous that there's too

44
00:02:28,680 --> 00:02:31,520
Speaker 4: much of its business committed to being able to support

45
00:02:31,520 --> 00:02:35,440
Speaker 4: open Ai. But I think Microsoft is well diversified, and

46
00:02:35,480 --> 00:02:36,800
Speaker 4: I think that might be an overreaction.

47
00:02:37,080 --> 00:02:39,760
Speaker 2: Before we talk about Meta, I want to explore this

48
00:02:40,000 --> 00:02:42,959
Speaker 2: open ai issue a little bit more visa v. Microsoft.

49
00:02:43,240 --> 00:02:45,960
Speaker 2: Are you saying that open ai potentially could be facing

50
00:02:46,040 --> 00:02:49,160
Speaker 2: a lot more in the way of competition, whether from

51
00:02:49,360 --> 00:02:53,519
Speaker 2: Alphabet or Google essentially, or perhaps Anthropic.

52
00:02:54,680 --> 00:02:55,760
Speaker 3: Yes, one percent.

53
00:02:56,480 --> 00:02:58,560
Speaker 4: I think what we're seeing, and by the way, Meta,

54
00:02:58,600 --> 00:03:02,560
Speaker 4: which we will talk about Meta Google and Thropic. But

55
00:03:02,720 --> 00:03:05,760
Speaker 4: Enthropic has been especially noisy lately, and then a really

56
00:03:05,800 --> 00:03:07,520
Speaker 4: good way we've seen what it's been able to do

57
00:03:07,600 --> 00:03:12,280
Speaker 4: with its code generation. It announced an outsized revenue performance

58
00:03:12,320 --> 00:03:15,920
Speaker 4: for the year. It has five times oversubscribed investment at

59
00:03:15,960 --> 00:03:18,600
Speaker 4: three hundred and fifty billion right now, and while that

60
00:03:18,720 --> 00:03:21,280
Speaker 4: still is smaller than open Ai, there's no question that

61
00:03:21,440 --> 00:03:24,560
Speaker 4: Entropic is executing very well, and it has to be

62
00:03:24,600 --> 00:03:28,079
Speaker 4: creating some jitters within investors that are looking at open

63
00:03:28,120 --> 00:03:30,720
Speaker 4: Ai as large commitments. And then, of course, all of

64
00:03:30,760 --> 00:03:33,560
Speaker 4: the companies attached to it its ecosystem. Google has no

65
00:03:33,680 --> 00:03:37,840
Speaker 4: doubt outperformed. Its market cap has soared. We were long

66
00:03:38,760 --> 00:03:41,440
Speaker 4: very optimistic about Google over the last year. We think

67
00:03:41,480 --> 00:03:44,480
Speaker 4: it's grown into a fair evaluation here, but it saw

68
00:03:44,480 --> 00:03:46,640
Speaker 4: its market cap almost double over the course of twenty

69
00:03:46,680 --> 00:03:49,080
Speaker 4: twenty five. And it's because it's been able to execute

70
00:03:49,160 --> 00:03:52,880
Speaker 4: not only models, but it has its own infrastructure. Microsoft

71
00:03:52,960 --> 00:03:55,000
Speaker 4: and Amazon other companies are just catching up on their

72
00:03:55,040 --> 00:03:58,800
Speaker 4: own homegrown chips. That's going to help with CAPEX. So yes,

73
00:03:58,920 --> 00:04:02,120
Speaker 4: all these things together are very important. But in the end,

74
00:04:02,160 --> 00:04:06,040
Speaker 4: what we're seeing Doug is compute is still the most

75
00:04:06,080 --> 00:04:09,520
Speaker 4: precious resource, and so you're seeing Metago big on investing

76
00:04:09,520 --> 00:04:13,560
Speaker 4: in compute. It's outsized CAPEX commitment. Microsoft is spending, but

77
00:04:13,640 --> 00:04:17,320
Speaker 4: they're spending to support that expected backlog, and so we

78
00:04:17,360 --> 00:04:20,520
Speaker 4: don't think the spending is as much a problem as

79
00:04:20,520 --> 00:04:22,920
Speaker 4: it is whether or not in who the customers are

80
00:04:23,080 --> 00:04:25,839
Speaker 4: that they're spending for. And I think that's what's creating

81
00:04:25,880 --> 00:04:28,839
Speaker 4: some consternation in the investor community.

82
00:04:29,120 --> 00:04:32,679
Speaker 2: So away from the hyperscalers, are you getting a sense

83
00:04:32,680 --> 00:04:35,039
Speaker 2: that we're going to begin for the people who are

84
00:04:35,120 --> 00:04:38,920
Speaker 2: actually investing in artificial intelligence, that we're going to begin

85
00:04:39,040 --> 00:04:41,520
Speaker 2: seeing an ROI, a return on investment.

86
00:04:43,040 --> 00:04:45,400
Speaker 4: We have said that this has to be and we

87
00:04:45,440 --> 00:04:48,159
Speaker 4: do believe it will be the year of ROI, of

88
00:04:48,240 --> 00:04:51,560
Speaker 4: a gentic AI and enterprise AI. And that's basically where

89
00:04:51,560 --> 00:04:55,520
Speaker 4: AI takes action to create greater productivity and efficiencies within business.

90
00:04:55,960 --> 00:04:59,359
Speaker 4: We think service now for instance, this quarter showed a

91
00:04:59,400 --> 00:05:04,800
Speaker 4: really strong perform so did IBM, both companies that provide

92
00:05:04,839 --> 00:05:09,360
Speaker 4: software to enterprises, AI platforms and AI capabilities to enterprises.

93
00:05:09,839 --> 00:05:12,880
Speaker 4: Enterprises are going to be consuming trillions of tokens. So

94
00:05:12,920 --> 00:05:14,919
Speaker 4: while many of us think of AI through the lens

95
00:05:14,920 --> 00:05:19,040
Speaker 4: of us using CHATGBT or using claud or using Gemini

96
00:05:19,120 --> 00:05:22,640
Speaker 4: in our everyday searches, the future is really when we

97
00:05:22,680 --> 00:05:25,080
Speaker 4: start to put AI to work to be able to

98
00:05:25,120 --> 00:05:28,919
Speaker 4: help automate workflows and processes within our everyday businesses. And

99
00:05:28,920 --> 00:05:32,039
Speaker 4: when that starts to scale inside healthcare and financial services

100
00:05:32,080 --> 00:05:35,040
Speaker 4: and inside manufacturing. That's where we think the inflection is

101
00:05:35,040 --> 00:05:37,120
Speaker 4: where business are going to say, okay, I spent X

102
00:05:37,200 --> 00:05:42,040
Speaker 4: dollars on AI software, agents, capabilities, and we are seeing

103
00:05:42,440 --> 00:05:46,520
Speaker 4: twenty thirty forty percent increases in productivity, which is yielding

104
00:05:46,640 --> 00:05:49,679
Speaker 4: greater profits, greater earnings, which.

105
00:05:49,480 --> 00:05:51,800
Speaker 3: Should be what it really appeases investors.

106
00:05:52,200 --> 00:05:55,320
Speaker 2: Tomorrow after the bell, we'll hear from Apple. This company

107
00:05:55,360 --> 00:05:58,479
Speaker 2: has been struggling a bit when it comes to artificial intelligence.

108
00:05:58,520 --> 00:06:02,440
Speaker 2: What will you be listening for or when Apple speaks

109
00:06:02,480 --> 00:06:04,159
Speaker 2: to analysts tomorrow after the bell.

110
00:06:05,360 --> 00:06:09,320
Speaker 4: Yeah, it's like Apple's wearing a fire retardant AI suit.

111
00:06:09,520 --> 00:06:11,679
Speaker 4: It just does not want to get in on AI.

112
00:06:12,040 --> 00:06:14,320
Speaker 4: I don't know why, you know, but it's funny because

113
00:06:14,320 --> 00:06:16,360
Speaker 4: they are sort of the opposite of all of these

114
00:06:16,400 --> 00:06:20,320
Speaker 4: other companies when it comes to their strategy.

115
00:06:20,320 --> 00:06:22,039
Speaker 3: They don't have the big cap ex commits.

116
00:06:22,080 --> 00:06:26,279
Speaker 4: They're really staying loyal to their existing hardware in the

117
00:06:26,320 --> 00:06:29,600
Speaker 4: moat that is their hardware ecosystem, and they're really trying

118
00:06:29,640 --> 00:06:33,120
Speaker 4: to maximize revenue by basically saying, yeah, we don't have

119
00:06:33,200 --> 00:06:35,480
Speaker 4: the models and we don't necessarily have the AI.

120
00:06:35,400 --> 00:06:38,159
Speaker 3: Software, but everybody's using it on our device.

121
00:06:38,600 --> 00:06:40,840
Speaker 4: So the big question for Apple is going to be

122
00:06:41,520 --> 00:06:44,680
Speaker 4: how long of a moat is the handset because that's

123
00:06:44,720 --> 00:06:47,520
Speaker 4: really where all of the momentum for Apple is.

124
00:06:47,560 --> 00:06:49,000
Speaker 3: And you're hearing things about wearables.

125
00:06:49,000 --> 00:06:52,200
Speaker 4: Maybe it's a metaglasses, maybe it's a pin or pendant

126
00:06:52,240 --> 00:06:54,760
Speaker 4: that's going to be worn from open ai. So the

127
00:06:55,160 --> 00:06:58,240
Speaker 4: platform is going to really matter over time. Apple, I think,

128
00:06:58,320 --> 00:07:00,960
Speaker 4: is one of those companies. Though they do the buybacks,

129
00:07:01,480 --> 00:07:04,920
Speaker 4: they continuously are sort of a safe haven because while

130
00:07:04,960 --> 00:07:07,080
Speaker 4: their numbers aren't as exciting as some of these other

131
00:07:07,080 --> 00:07:09,880
Speaker 4: companies for growth, they tend to perform and that's really

132
00:07:09,920 --> 00:07:11,120
Speaker 4: what Tim Cook's great at.

133
00:07:11,280 --> 00:07:12,880
Speaker 3: But I do think they need a leadership change.

134
00:07:12,880 --> 00:07:16,480
Speaker 4: They need to bring a young, aggressive, sort of transformational

135
00:07:16,560 --> 00:07:19,160
Speaker 4: leader to be the next Steve Jobs, the next person

136
00:07:19,160 --> 00:07:20,880
Speaker 4: that's you know, and there's no other Steve Jobs, but

137
00:07:20,920 --> 00:07:23,320
Speaker 4: the next of that ILK that's going to come in

138
00:07:23,360 --> 00:07:25,600
Speaker 4: and really change up Apple, because right now it is

139
00:07:25,640 --> 00:07:27,160
Speaker 4: definitely getting a little bit stale.

140
00:07:27,400 --> 00:07:30,760
Speaker 2: So the former Apple designer Johnny Ive is working with

141
00:07:30,920 --> 00:07:35,960
Speaker 2: open ai right now and developing a physical AI hardware device.

142
00:07:36,960 --> 00:07:39,840
Speaker 2: And before and I heard the criticism that you made

143
00:07:39,880 --> 00:07:44,760
Speaker 2: earlier of open ai, and that just how concentrated it

144
00:07:44,920 --> 00:07:47,000
Speaker 2: is right now in terms of its ability to kind

145
00:07:47,000 --> 00:07:49,440
Speaker 2: of connect with other companies in this AI space and

146
00:07:49,480 --> 00:07:53,239
Speaker 2: the risk that that may present. Is it too soon

147
00:07:53,680 --> 00:07:56,360
Speaker 2: to write off open Ai? I mean, we don't want

148
00:07:56,400 --> 00:07:59,720
Speaker 2: to throw out the baby with the bathwater necessarily, do we.

149
00:08:00,400 --> 00:08:02,520
Speaker 4: It's it would be a huge mistake. I mean, this

150
00:08:02,560 --> 00:08:05,080
Speaker 4: company has grown faster than any other company in history,

151
00:08:05,680 --> 00:08:08,680
Speaker 4: and it has some great capabilities. It is still the

152
00:08:08,760 --> 00:08:13,800
Speaker 4: synonymous brand with Generative AI or LLLMS. Right, you're using Chatchipt.

153
00:08:14,080 --> 00:08:16,480
Speaker 4: Even if you're using Gemini, people say I'm using Chatchipt.

154
00:08:16,960 --> 00:08:22,200
Speaker 4: So they've definitely created a brand an identity in the market.

155
00:08:22,240 --> 00:08:24,400
Speaker 3: But what has happened is a couple of things.

156
00:08:24,400 --> 00:08:26,800
Speaker 4: The first thing to happen is we have seen models,

157
00:08:26,920 --> 00:08:29,720
Speaker 4: and we talked about this earlier, you know, with model parody.

158
00:08:29,760 --> 00:08:32,760
Speaker 4: We're seeing Gemini leap frog and open ai model, and

159
00:08:32,800 --> 00:08:36,360
Speaker 4: then Anthropic and leapfrogs both, and then maybe a Chinese

160
00:08:36,440 --> 00:08:39,800
Speaker 4: open source model leapfrogs all of them in a certain capability,

161
00:08:39,800 --> 00:08:42,280
Speaker 4: and then open ai comes back. But what all these

162
00:08:42,360 --> 00:08:44,720
Speaker 4: companies understand is that the real mote is going to

163
00:08:44,720 --> 00:08:47,320
Speaker 4: be compute power, so all of them and this is

164
00:08:47,320 --> 00:08:50,000
Speaker 4: why Sam was spending so big. This is why Anthropics

165
00:08:50,080 --> 00:08:53,160
Speaker 4: now gone to Google and Amazon beyond Nvidia, this is

166
00:08:53,200 --> 00:08:55,480
Speaker 4: why Microsoft is spending so much on Capex, and of

167
00:08:55,480 --> 00:08:57,880
Speaker 4: course this is why Mark wants to build the Metacloud.

168
00:08:58,320 --> 00:09:00,440
Speaker 4: Sam was right when he was trying trying to go

169
00:09:00,480 --> 00:09:02,640
Speaker 4: out and build these contracts and get all these commitments

170
00:09:02,679 --> 00:09:06,000
Speaker 4: for compute power, because what that gives open ai will

171
00:09:06,000 --> 00:09:09,040
Speaker 4: be the flexibility to continue to innovate, to build, and

172
00:09:09,080 --> 00:09:10,280
Speaker 4: to pivot, knowing that.

173
00:09:10,200 --> 00:09:14,240
Speaker 3: What they're building today may only be the DVD.

174
00:09:14,000 --> 00:09:17,800
Speaker 4: Shipment version of Netflix, and that the future might be

175
00:09:17,840 --> 00:09:20,000
Speaker 4: something that looks more like the streaming version. You know,

176
00:09:20,080 --> 00:09:22,440
Speaker 4: we are going to see great innovation in AI, and

177
00:09:22,480 --> 00:09:24,160
Speaker 4: we don't even know what's going to come next. But

178
00:09:24,200 --> 00:09:26,640
Speaker 4: the one thing that all of these AI labs know,

179
00:09:27,000 --> 00:09:31,120
Speaker 4: that all of these hyper scalers know, that Mark Zuckerberg knows,

180
00:09:31,200 --> 00:09:34,880
Speaker 4: is that they don't have the compute power. They will

181
00:09:34,920 --> 00:09:37,840
Speaker 4: not be able to compete at some inflection in the future.

182
00:09:37,880 --> 00:09:40,120
Speaker 4: So Sam should not be SAM and openet should not

183
00:09:40,160 --> 00:09:42,960
Speaker 4: be written off. But there is very real reason to

184
00:09:43,000 --> 00:09:46,760
Speaker 4: be concerned if the current offerings that Sam has, if

185
00:09:46,760 --> 00:09:48,719
Speaker 4: he doesn't have a trick up his sleeve, because he's

186
00:09:48,760 --> 00:09:54,520
Speaker 4: certainly been caught with companies offering parody, offering competitive products,

187
00:09:54,559 --> 00:09:59,560
Speaker 4: and offering you know, alternatives that he has to deal with,

188
00:09:59,679 --> 00:10:01,440
Speaker 4: and so so that's going to be a big question.

189
00:10:01,520 --> 00:10:03,520
Speaker 4: But it's too soon to say open ai won't be

190
00:10:03,559 --> 00:10:03,960
Speaker 4: the winner.

191
00:10:04,200 --> 00:10:06,800
Speaker 2: So given everything we're talking about, does it really come

192
00:10:06,840 --> 00:10:08,600
Speaker 2: back to in Nvidia. At the end of the day,

193
00:10:08,640 --> 00:10:11,559
Speaker 2: you've got to belong that company because it's involved in

194
00:10:12,640 --> 00:10:15,400
Speaker 2: everything that's going right on right now in the space.

195
00:10:16,360 --> 00:10:20,880
Speaker 4: Look, if there wasn't great indicators from the TSMC results

196
00:10:20,960 --> 00:10:25,640
Speaker 4: from ASML which printed this morning that the insatiable demand

197
00:10:25,640 --> 00:10:29,439
Speaker 4: for compute is still very much intact. If these CAPEX

198
00:10:29,520 --> 00:10:32,200
Speaker 4: numbers aren't proving it, and if in Nvidia isn't the

199
00:10:32,200 --> 00:10:33,520
Speaker 4: biggest winner, I don't.

200
00:10:33,280 --> 00:10:33,760
Speaker 3: Know who is.

201
00:10:33,960 --> 00:10:37,240
Speaker 4: Nvidia is still making up the lion's share of the

202
00:10:37,320 --> 00:10:41,160
Speaker 4: compute It has among the most innovative products at any

203
00:10:41,160 --> 00:10:44,480
Speaker 4: given time. Of course, some may claim one spack or another,

204
00:10:44,520 --> 00:10:47,599
Speaker 4: but they have the deepest moat, the most loyalty in customers,

205
00:10:47,679 --> 00:10:51,800
Speaker 4: the largest backlog and revenue book that we've seen in

206
00:10:51,840 --> 00:10:55,440
Speaker 4: the marketplace, and right now it is the incumbent. And

207
00:10:55,760 --> 00:10:59,480
Speaker 4: also for the investors out there, it's trading at a

208
00:10:59,600 --> 00:11:03,559
Speaker 4: fairly low multiple. If you believe the forecast that it's

209
00:11:03,600 --> 00:11:06,120
Speaker 4: putting out and of course the order book that it

210
00:11:06,160 --> 00:11:08,600
Speaker 4: sees over the next year, you have to be very

211
00:11:08,600 --> 00:11:12,040
Speaker 4: optimistic that NVIDIAs come back to you. As an investor

212
00:11:12,400 --> 00:11:15,160
Speaker 4: and you have to be very positive that is still

213
00:11:16,080 --> 00:11:20,720
Speaker 4: the most likely to win the infrastructure battle over.

214
00:11:20,559 --> 00:11:21,160
Speaker 3: The long run.

215
00:11:21,280 --> 00:11:23,480
Speaker 2: Daniel will leave it there always a pleasure. Thanks so much.

216
00:11:23,600 --> 00:11:27,200
Speaker 2: Daniel Newman is the CEO of Futurum Group. Joining us

217
00:11:27,200 --> 00:11:38,000
Speaker 2: here on the Daybreak Asia podcast. Welcome back to the

218
00:11:38,080 --> 00:11:41,760
Speaker 2: Daybreak Asia Podcast. I'm Doug Krisner. The FED left interest

219
00:11:41,840 --> 00:11:45,400
Speaker 2: rates unchanged on Wednesday, in a move that was widely expected.

220
00:11:45,480 --> 00:11:49,440
Speaker 2: Policymakers pointed to improvements in the American economy as well

221
00:11:49,440 --> 00:11:52,199
Speaker 2: as the job market. Here is Chair J. Powell.

222
00:11:52,240 --> 00:11:55,320
Speaker 5: The US economy expanded at a solid pace last year

223
00:11:55,800 --> 00:11:58,840
Speaker 5: and just coming into twenty twenty six on a firm footing.

224
00:12:00,240 --> 00:12:03,319
Speaker 5: While job gains have remained low, the unemployment rate has

225
00:12:03,360 --> 00:12:08,800
Speaker 5: shown some signs of stabilization, and inflation remains somewhat elevated now.

226
00:12:08,840 --> 00:12:11,800
Speaker 2: As a result, the Fed did signal a more cautious

227
00:12:11,800 --> 00:12:16,199
Speaker 2: approach when it came to future potential cuts in interest rates.

228
00:12:16,520 --> 00:12:19,920
Speaker 2: And that's where we begin our conversation with Jeanette Garatty.

229
00:12:20,280 --> 00:12:23,880
Speaker 2: Jeanette is chief economist at Robertson Stevens. She spoke with

230
00:12:23,880 --> 00:12:27,119
Speaker 2: Bloomberg TV host Sherry on and April Hong.

231
00:12:27,120 --> 00:12:31,400
Speaker 6: And does today's FED decision move the needle at all

232
00:12:31,440 --> 00:12:34,000
Speaker 6: when it comes to great expectations for the rest of the.

233
00:12:34,000 --> 00:12:40,120
Speaker 7: Year, great expectations for the US economy. Perhaps not really,

234
00:12:40,480 --> 00:12:45,600
Speaker 7: I don't think this changes much of anything. First of all,

235
00:12:45,760 --> 00:12:50,560
Speaker 7: it was expected. Second of all, there was actually remarkably

236
00:12:50,640 --> 00:12:54,080
Speaker 7: little discussion in the press conference. I was very surprised

237
00:12:54,120 --> 00:12:59,560
Speaker 7: about the trajectory on interest rates beyond some discussion about

238
00:12:59,559 --> 00:13:04,760
Speaker 7: the next So I think he you know, maybe everybody

239
00:13:04,840 --> 00:13:07,440
Speaker 7: thought they knew what Jerome Powell was going to say

240
00:13:07,480 --> 00:13:09,400
Speaker 7: if they tried to pin him down to the second

241
00:13:09,400 --> 00:13:12,800
Speaker 7: half the year, But there really wasn't a whole lot

242
00:13:13,120 --> 00:13:17,720
Speaker 7: of substance there. And he did a rather interesting thing,

243
00:13:19,040 --> 00:13:22,760
Speaker 7: in my view, which is to shine a light on

244
00:13:23,480 --> 00:13:27,120
Speaker 7: some of the fiscal policy issues, some of the things

245
00:13:27,160 --> 00:13:31,120
Speaker 7: that are bothering people in the US economy right now,

246
00:13:31,160 --> 00:13:34,440
Speaker 7: if you will, do not have monetary policy solutions, only

247
00:13:34,480 --> 00:13:40,040
Speaker 7: have fiscal policy solutions. So that's where I think he's

248
00:13:40,040 --> 00:13:43,720
Speaker 7: saying that the needle is going to move, and he's

249
00:13:43,760 --> 00:13:47,040
Speaker 7: comfortable with monetary policy where it is right now. That

250
00:13:47,080 --> 00:13:49,200
Speaker 7: could change, as it always.

251
00:13:51,120 --> 00:13:53,240
Speaker 6: To your point, a little bit of that ca shaped

252
00:13:53,240 --> 00:13:56,560
Speaker 6: economy that we're seeing, right, the wealthy getting wealthier. But

253
00:13:56,840 --> 00:13:58,880
Speaker 6: also I think a lot of that conversation was crowded

254
00:13:58,920 --> 00:14:00,920
Speaker 6: out by the fact that we were really getting a

255
00:14:00,920 --> 00:14:03,120
Speaker 6: lot of questions around the politics of everything.

256
00:14:03,200 --> 00:14:03,440
Speaker 3: Right.

257
00:14:04,640 --> 00:14:06,880
Speaker 6: I have to ask you, what do you make a

258
00:14:06,960 --> 00:14:08,880
Speaker 6: Governor Waller's dubbish descent.

259
00:14:09,280 --> 00:14:10,079
Speaker 3: Does that sort of.

260
00:14:10,000 --> 00:14:13,280
Speaker 6: Give us a FED put in the months ahead if

261
00:14:13,320 --> 00:14:14,959
Speaker 6: he were to become the next FED chair?

262
00:14:17,040 --> 00:14:21,040
Speaker 7: Possibly The only thing I made of it right now

263
00:14:21,640 --> 00:14:27,640
Speaker 7: actually one that's a bit of a offhand remark, which

264
00:14:27,720 --> 00:14:31,480
Speaker 7: is that he's the only FED governor that the current

265
00:14:31,600 --> 00:14:38,440
Speaker 7: sitting FED voting member who is being contemplated to be

266
00:14:38,520 --> 00:14:42,400
Speaker 7: a future head of the FED. So, you know, he

267
00:14:42,960 --> 00:14:46,640
Speaker 7: voted this way because as perhaps he wanted to single

268
00:14:46,880 --> 00:14:50,680
Speaker 7: signaled to various people that he in fact would be

269
00:14:50,800 --> 00:14:56,920
Speaker 7: rather dummish. The leeway, the theoretical leeway for why he

270
00:14:57,000 --> 00:15:01,840
Speaker 7: did that was in d compous remarks. He did say

271
00:15:02,920 --> 00:15:05,880
Speaker 7: that while he feels and why the majority of the board,

272
00:15:05,960 --> 00:15:08,880
Speaker 7: while the majority of the Board felt that they were

273
00:15:08,960 --> 00:15:14,440
Speaker 7: very comfortably in the neutral range for monetary policy, in

274
00:15:14,480 --> 00:15:17,160
Speaker 7: the neutral rate of interest, that it was at the

275
00:15:17,240 --> 00:15:21,240
Speaker 7: high end, So there could be you know, it's not

276
00:15:22,240 --> 00:15:25,320
Speaker 7: out of bounds that Chris Waller could say, well, I

277
00:15:25,360 --> 00:15:27,720
Speaker 7: think we could have cut a quarter point and we

278
00:15:27,760 --> 00:15:34,200
Speaker 7: would still be firmly in the area of neutral policy stances.

279
00:15:34,240 --> 00:15:36,280
Speaker 7: So that would be the cover for what he decided

280
00:15:36,320 --> 00:15:36,560
Speaker 7: to do.

281
00:15:39,680 --> 00:15:41,720
Speaker 8: And that's just seems to be just focused on the

282
00:15:41,800 --> 00:15:44,240
Speaker 8: puff in the second half for the FED. I mean,

283
00:15:44,280 --> 00:15:46,200
Speaker 8: you look at the way goal has popped, right, the

284
00:15:46,400 --> 00:15:50,320
Speaker 8: expectation of a doubbish shift. What is your sense of

285
00:15:50,760 --> 00:15:53,280
Speaker 8: you know, in the first half, is it fair assumption

286
00:15:53,440 --> 00:15:54,560
Speaker 8: that we're not going to see a cut?

287
00:15:57,160 --> 00:16:00,400
Speaker 7: Well, now you're pinning me down to time and date

288
00:16:00,600 --> 00:16:04,240
Speaker 7: and magnetude, all of that step that economists love to avoid.

289
00:16:05,360 --> 00:16:09,880
Speaker 7: I do think that there will be two cuts this year.

290
00:16:10,120 --> 00:16:14,320
Speaker 7: The timing of it I would see as mostly being

291
00:16:14,480 --> 00:16:16,640
Speaker 7: in the second half, but could come in a little

292
00:16:16,640 --> 00:16:21,080
Speaker 7: bit earlier. But my expectation is premised on an assumption

293
00:16:21,800 --> 00:16:25,440
Speaker 7: then we will actually see some improvements in the inflation

294
00:16:25,640 --> 00:16:29,240
Speaker 7: numbers because of the way that the numbers are calculated

295
00:16:29,280 --> 00:16:32,960
Speaker 7: and because of other general trends in the economy. And

296
00:16:32,960 --> 00:16:37,920
Speaker 7: I'm making a grand assumption that there won't be any

297
00:16:38,480 --> 00:16:45,400
Speaker 7: unexpected terrriff announcements. But if that doesn't happen, then then

298
00:16:45,520 --> 00:16:48,320
Speaker 7: I don't know about those two cuts, and we could

299
00:16:48,440 --> 00:16:53,320
Speaker 7: we could have a very confrontational environment if inflation starts

300
00:16:53,360 --> 00:16:57,280
Speaker 7: to go the other way. I don't see that right now.

301
00:16:57,520 --> 00:17:00,320
Speaker 7: I think two cuts are in the mix. See it

302
00:17:00,400 --> 00:17:02,960
Speaker 7: starting at midyear.

303
00:17:03,600 --> 00:17:08,320
Speaker 8: Okay, so a couple of caveats to those Outlook, what

304
00:17:08,480 --> 00:17:12,239
Speaker 8: is your sense of the dollar whiplacks that we've been

305
00:17:12,240 --> 00:17:16,199
Speaker 8: seeing this week and the overall negative trajectory for the

306
00:17:16,280 --> 00:17:19,400
Speaker 8: green bag. How might that affect the US economy?

307
00:17:21,680 --> 00:17:25,640
Speaker 7: It will have macroeconomic effects. It will have effects on

308
00:17:26,320 --> 00:17:30,439
Speaker 7: prices in the United States. So the weaker dollar makes

309
00:17:30,680 --> 00:17:34,440
Speaker 7: those goods coming in from overseas that much more expensive.

310
00:17:34,520 --> 00:17:38,040
Speaker 7: We always we always see that in play. I think

311
00:17:38,960 --> 00:17:45,880
Speaker 7: Scott Bessant and Jerome Pwell are being economically intellectually honest

312
00:17:45,960 --> 00:17:51,680
Speaker 7: here in recognizing that, first of all, you can't do

313
00:17:52,040 --> 00:17:54,760
Speaker 7: very often what you want to do for the domestic

314
00:17:54,840 --> 00:17:59,800
Speaker 7: economy if you are trying to do something for the

315
00:18:00,600 --> 00:18:04,480
Speaker 7: something in the global markets, for example, at the same time,

316
00:18:04,520 --> 00:18:07,800
Speaker 7: you usually have to pick one perspective to determine policy.

317
00:18:08,359 --> 00:18:10,760
Speaker 7: It's domestic and that's what they're going to stick with.

318
00:18:12,520 --> 00:18:17,040
Speaker 7: There's there's obviously a lot going on. I'm not sure

319
00:18:17,160 --> 00:18:21,199
Speaker 7: how much of what is going on honestly reflects the

320
00:18:21,200 --> 00:18:26,400
Speaker 7: fundamentals as I see it. This is still a very point,

321
00:18:27,119 --> 00:18:30,320
Speaker 7: you know, and so it should the dollar should not

322
00:18:30,400 --> 00:18:31,400
Speaker 7: weaken this much.

323
00:18:33,880 --> 00:18:36,000
Speaker 6: Yeah, I mean to your point on the inflationary effects

324
00:18:36,040 --> 00:18:37,959
Speaker 6: of the US dollar. We saw a long term treasure

325
00:18:38,040 --> 00:18:40,840
Speaker 6: yields actually move as the dollar was falling, and actually

326
00:18:40,840 --> 00:18:43,840
Speaker 6: moving the opposite direction as the dollar rebounded.

327
00:18:43,920 --> 00:18:44,160
Speaker 4: Right.

328
00:18:45,359 --> 00:18:47,280
Speaker 6: I want to take you to the earlier point that

329
00:18:47,320 --> 00:18:50,800
Speaker 6: you were making about this bifurcation in the US economy

330
00:18:50,840 --> 00:18:52,879
Speaker 6: as well, because we have seen the Fed now perhaps

331
00:18:52,920 --> 00:18:56,399
Speaker 6: shift towards UH their focus on the stabilization of the

332
00:18:56,480 --> 00:19:01,120
Speaker 6: job market, but that key shaped economy that we continue

333
00:19:01,119 --> 00:19:03,159
Speaker 6: to see in the US. How problematic could this be?

334
00:19:04,880 --> 00:19:10,440
Speaker 7: Well, it's very problematic from a political standpoint. It's problematic

335
00:19:10,520 --> 00:19:17,479
Speaker 7: for monetaries, for the Federal Reserve because it partially goes

336
00:19:17,520 --> 00:19:20,000
Speaker 7: to the heart of what they feel they are there

337
00:19:20,040 --> 00:19:24,560
Speaker 7: to do, which is to protect the general fabric of

338
00:19:24,640 --> 00:19:28,000
Speaker 7: the US economy, which is usually expressed in terms of

339
00:19:28,560 --> 00:19:31,960
Speaker 7: inflation and employment, but it covers a number of other things.

340
00:19:32,000 --> 00:19:36,399
Speaker 7: So I don't think they like necessarily what they're seeing there,

341
00:19:35,920 --> 00:19:40,359
Speaker 7: but their tools are not tools that are designed to

342
00:19:40,520 --> 00:19:44,280
Speaker 7: do something about many of these things, and so that's

343
00:19:44,280 --> 00:19:48,920
Speaker 7: why I think there was Jerome Powell correctly mentioned, well,

344
00:19:48,960 --> 00:19:53,440
Speaker 7: it's understandable why from a spending standpoint, we are seeing

345
00:19:53,520 --> 00:19:57,720
Speaker 7: stronger spending in one sector of the economy, because that's

346
00:19:57,720 --> 00:20:00,920
Speaker 7: a sector that attempts to hold more ox and bonds,

347
00:20:01,080 --> 00:20:04,200
Speaker 7: more real estate. Those are areas where prices have gone up,

348
00:20:04,240 --> 00:20:08,920
Speaker 7: and so they're spending it. But the fundamental problem of

349
00:20:09,200 --> 00:20:16,600
Speaker 7: affordability and employment availability in certain sectors, that's a hard

350
00:20:16,680 --> 00:20:18,560
Speaker 7: one for the FED to address.

351
00:20:20,119 --> 00:20:23,919
Speaker 2: That was Jeanette Gerritty, chief economist at Robertson Stephens, speaking

352
00:20:23,920 --> 00:20:27,600
Speaker 2: to Bloomberg TV host Sherry On in April home bringing

353
00:20:27,600 --> 00:20:32,480
Speaker 2: it to you here on the Daybreak Asia podcast. Thanks

354
00:20:32,520 --> 00:20:36,160
Speaker 2: for listening to today's episode of the Bloomberg Daybreak Asia

355
00:20:36,320 --> 00:20:40,760
Speaker 2: Edition podcast. Each weekday, we look at the story shaping markets, finance,

356
00:20:41,119 --> 00:20:44,199
Speaker 2: and geopolitics in the Asia Pacific. You can find us

357
00:20:44,200 --> 00:20:48,400
Speaker 2: on Apple, Spotify, the Bloomberg Podcast YouTube channel, or anywhere

358
00:20:48,440 --> 00:20:51,520
Speaker 2: else you listen. Join us again tomorrow for insight on

359
00:20:51,600 --> 00:20:55,720
Speaker 2: the market moves from Hong Kong to Singapore and Australia.

360
00:20:56,160 --> 00:20:58,639
Speaker 2: I'm Doug prisoner and this is Bloomberg