WEBVTT - Rob Glaser

0:00:05.280 --> 0:00:07.600
<v Speaker 1>Okay, we're gonna jump right into it. So, Rob, what

0:00:07.600 --> 0:00:09.760
<v Speaker 1>did your father do for a living? What did my

0:00:09.760 --> 0:00:12.320
<v Speaker 1>father do? From My father had a small printing company

0:00:12.320 --> 0:00:16.440
<v Speaker 1>in New York called Flair Printing, which was on eight West,

0:00:16.800 --> 0:00:19.279
<v Speaker 1>just off Fifth and Uh. It was a business he

0:00:19.320 --> 0:00:21.480
<v Speaker 1>started in nineteen sixty two years before I was born.

0:00:21.880 --> 0:00:24.400
<v Speaker 1>And he did it my whole adult kid, my whole

0:00:24.400 --> 0:00:27.720
<v Speaker 1>life growing up New York up until about nine. And

0:00:27.840 --> 0:00:30.080
<v Speaker 1>you grew up in Manhattan. So I grew up in Yonkers,

0:00:30.080 --> 0:00:31.840
<v Speaker 1>two blocks outside of the Bronx. I was born in

0:00:32.080 --> 0:00:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Mount Sina Hospital, so I was born in Manhattan, but

0:00:34.040 --> 0:00:36.199
<v Speaker 1>I grew up in basically Yonkers. But I know you

0:00:36.240 --> 0:00:39.280
<v Speaker 1>went to the same school as Jason Flam Right, Jason

0:00:39.320 --> 0:00:42.200
<v Speaker 1>flam and I were both Filston class of seventy nine. Um,

0:00:42.560 --> 0:00:45.519
<v Speaker 1>it's a it's a true story. I met Jason uh

0:00:45.640 --> 0:00:49.080
<v Speaker 1>freshman year that Fieldston has two feeder schools, a grammar

0:00:49.120 --> 0:00:51.199
<v Speaker 1>school called Filston Lower, which is the one I went to,

0:00:51.520 --> 0:00:53.800
<v Speaker 1>and know the grammar school called Ethical in Midtown Manhattan,

0:00:53.800 --> 0:00:55.840
<v Speaker 1>which is what Jason went to. I think. So Jason

0:00:55.880 --> 0:00:58.639
<v Speaker 1>I first met in seventh grade in Mrs Lesher's home

0:00:58.720 --> 0:01:01.240
<v Speaker 1>room and I remembered ovidly because one of the first

0:01:01.320 --> 0:01:04.880
<v Speaker 1>days of school, Jason walked in with a T shirt. Uh,

0:01:04.920 --> 0:01:07.200
<v Speaker 1>this is nineteen seventy three, I think, with a T

0:01:07.319 --> 0:01:09.920
<v Speaker 1>shirt of one pig on top of another one said

0:01:10.000 --> 0:01:15.040
<v Speaker 1>Macon Bacon and Mrs Lesher made Jason go home and

0:01:15.080 --> 0:01:18.040
<v Speaker 1>get a different shirt. So he was a troublemaker from

0:01:18.120 --> 0:01:20.600
<v Speaker 1>day one. Were you friendly with Jason? Then? Jason and

0:01:20.640 --> 0:01:23.679
<v Speaker 1>I were always like, uh, friendly, but not best buddies.

0:01:23.720 --> 0:01:26.640
<v Speaker 1>We were in different circles. Um and Uh I was

0:01:26.720 --> 0:01:29.840
<v Speaker 1>like Jason. Uh. I've learned subsequently as we've become much

0:01:29.840 --> 0:01:32.320
<v Speaker 1>closer as adults. Part of wide and see him a

0:01:32.360 --> 0:01:33.720
<v Speaker 1>lot of part of high school, and he spent a

0:01:33.760 --> 0:01:35.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of time at the track, which I think he's

0:01:35.520 --> 0:01:38.679
<v Speaker 1>talked about subsequently. So he, Jason spent the latter part

0:01:38.680 --> 0:01:41.839
<v Speaker 1>of his high school years uh, in a very different

0:01:41.880 --> 0:01:44.360
<v Speaker 1>arc than I spent on mine. Uh. And we reconnected

0:01:44.440 --> 0:01:48.120
<v Speaker 1>later in life. Okay, so were you a science kid

0:01:48.520 --> 0:01:50.800
<v Speaker 1>from day one? I was more of a math kid

0:01:50.800 --> 0:01:53.480
<v Speaker 1>than a science kid. I was one of these kids

0:01:53.480 --> 0:01:55.280
<v Speaker 1>who just numbers. I always made sense to me. I

0:01:55.320 --> 0:01:57.840
<v Speaker 1>grew up a baseball fan and to me, like baseball

0:01:57.960 --> 0:02:01.520
<v Speaker 1>with statistics, so like literal would would study way before

0:02:01.840 --> 0:02:04.520
<v Speaker 1>saber metrics or way before any of this stuff became popular.

0:02:04.720 --> 0:02:07.360
<v Speaker 1>I would know everybody's batting average to the fourth decimal point.

0:02:07.640 --> 0:02:10.000
<v Speaker 1>I just numbers kind of made sense to me, and

0:02:10.320 --> 0:02:12.360
<v Speaker 1>I was like a numbers kid. I also liked media.

0:02:12.400 --> 0:02:14.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean my one of my favorite things to do

0:02:14.720 --> 0:02:17.320
<v Speaker 1>was listening to w ABC radio as a kid. I

0:02:17.360 --> 0:02:20.040
<v Speaker 1>just felt like radio was like this window to the

0:02:20.040 --> 0:02:22.840
<v Speaker 1>whole wide universe. This is you know. I didn't at

0:02:22.840 --> 0:02:25.079
<v Speaker 1>the time, I didn't have a shortwave radio, and it

0:02:25.120 --> 0:02:27.519
<v Speaker 1>was obviously way before other stuff ended up doing. But

0:02:27.560 --> 0:02:30.760
<v Speaker 1>I was like media, especially music started radio station when

0:02:30.760 --> 0:02:33.160
<v Speaker 1>I was in high school. So I was the fact

0:02:33.240 --> 0:02:35.480
<v Speaker 1>that my life ended up connecting to music, even though

0:02:35.480 --> 0:02:38.640
<v Speaker 1>I have very, very poor skills as a performer. I

0:02:38.680 --> 0:02:40.440
<v Speaker 1>played cello for two years in piano for a couple

0:02:40.440 --> 0:02:42.200
<v Speaker 1>of years, and I sucked at both of them. But

0:02:42.320 --> 0:02:45.000
<v Speaker 1>I love music, and music and math were two of

0:02:45.000 --> 0:02:50.040
<v Speaker 1>my passions growing up. And was that encouraged in your household? Uh?

0:02:50.200 --> 0:02:53.240
<v Speaker 1>Yet both were? Um? I mean my uh my my

0:02:54.000 --> 0:02:55.760
<v Speaker 1>sisters two years older, and she was a really good

0:02:55.760 --> 0:02:58.960
<v Speaker 1>pianist and music good musician. She went to Oberlin the

0:02:59.000 --> 0:03:00.680
<v Speaker 1>lulib Arts part, but she spent a lot of time

0:03:00.680 --> 0:03:02.760
<v Speaker 1>with her buddies in the conservatory. She went to music camp.

0:03:03.000 --> 0:03:04.760
<v Speaker 1>So she's quite a good musician, or was quite a

0:03:04.800 --> 0:03:07.840
<v Speaker 1>good musician, probably still is. Uh and uh. I was

0:03:07.880 --> 0:03:09.880
<v Speaker 1>like the math kid, and so we kind of each

0:03:09.880 --> 0:03:13.359
<v Speaker 1>gave each other our own turfs kind of deal. But yeah,

0:03:13.400 --> 0:03:15.280
<v Speaker 1>my parents were like they were both the first and

0:03:15.320 --> 0:03:18.080
<v Speaker 1>their families to go to college. They were very much

0:03:18.120 --> 0:03:22.280
<v Speaker 1>focused on pushing us in academic directions. But in a

0:03:22.600 --> 0:03:25.280
<v Speaker 1>Jewish family, well, my mom's Catholic, my dad's Jewish. Really

0:03:25.280 --> 0:03:28.120
<v Speaker 1>we raised Jewish. I was great double majored and guilt

0:03:28.520 --> 0:03:32.440
<v Speaker 1>um and uh uh so I, well, the woman you're

0:03:32.440 --> 0:03:36.320
<v Speaker 1>married to now she Jewish. I've actually done multiple religions.

0:03:36.320 --> 0:03:38.240
<v Speaker 1>I've buried at jew and I've married a Catholic woman,

0:03:38.360 --> 0:03:40.920
<v Speaker 1>so I've kind of haven't done Buddhists yet. But okay,

0:03:41.320 --> 0:03:45.160
<v Speaker 1>but but I am uh my current partner grew up Catholic,

0:03:45.240 --> 0:03:47.320
<v Speaker 1>so yes, I've gotten back to Catholicism. But you can

0:03:47.320 --> 0:03:49.840
<v Speaker 1>only marry what I'm told. Um, although the Pube's kind

0:03:49.880 --> 0:03:54.160
<v Speaker 1>of changed that, I think. But but anyway, the Uh,

0:03:54.600 --> 0:03:57.800
<v Speaker 1>the role of religion. We had a Christmas tree, which

0:03:57.880 --> 0:04:00.720
<v Speaker 1>was kind of almost a cultural thing, but we were

0:04:00.760 --> 0:04:02.960
<v Speaker 1>mostly My mom was from California, so I didn't really

0:04:03.000 --> 0:04:05.840
<v Speaker 1>know as closely my the Catholic side of the family.

0:04:06.040 --> 0:04:09.120
<v Speaker 1>I knew the Jewish relaity was my dad's brother lived

0:04:09.160 --> 0:04:11.840
<v Speaker 1>in Long Island and we would do holidays with him,

0:04:11.880 --> 0:04:14.240
<v Speaker 1>So I was in Fieldson is probably like a third Jewish,

0:04:14.280 --> 0:04:16.520
<v Speaker 1>so I was in touch with kind of both sides

0:04:16.520 --> 0:04:18.440
<v Speaker 1>of my heritage. Okay, you have I have to ask

0:04:18.440 --> 0:04:20.440
<v Speaker 1>them if your mother was from California, did your father

0:04:20.520 --> 0:04:23.400
<v Speaker 1>meet her? It's actually an awesome story. So my dad

0:04:23.440 --> 0:04:27.320
<v Speaker 1>and my mom met at a folk dancing place, uh

0:04:27.400 --> 0:04:32.159
<v Speaker 1>in nineteen fifty three or nine four, I think, Uh.

0:04:32.200 --> 0:04:34.360
<v Speaker 1>And my dad and his best friend, Bob weren't back,

0:04:34.760 --> 0:04:38.080
<v Speaker 1>and my mom and her her best friend, uh Felice,

0:04:38.520 --> 0:04:42.480
<v Speaker 1>both went to this place, and uh, three lifelong couples

0:04:42.480 --> 0:04:44.800
<v Speaker 1>were formed that night. So my mom and my dad met,

0:04:44.920 --> 0:04:47.360
<v Speaker 1>Felice met her husband Roger, and Bob and his wife

0:04:47.400 --> 0:04:49.479
<v Speaker 1>Audrey all the same night. So I don't know it

0:04:49.480 --> 0:04:52.560
<v Speaker 1>was in the tequila there that night, but something magical, uh,

0:04:52.600 --> 0:04:56.520
<v Speaker 1>and they all married for life, which was just pretty

0:04:56.520 --> 0:04:58.760
<v Speaker 1>amazing and what was folk dancing? Did they ever tell

0:04:58.800 --> 0:05:01.440
<v Speaker 1>you what actually went trance fired at this venue? There

0:05:01.440 --> 0:05:04.440
<v Speaker 1>were no videotapes at the time, so there's very subjective

0:05:04.440 --> 0:05:06.840
<v Speaker 1>recollections of it, but it was. It was a meaningful night,

0:05:06.880 --> 0:05:09.760
<v Speaker 1>obviously for all six of them. Uh and relatively you know,

0:05:09.800 --> 0:05:12.040
<v Speaker 1>my parents were married over fifty years until my dad

0:05:12.040 --> 0:05:14.320
<v Speaker 1>passed away five years ago, and so they had a

0:05:14.360 --> 0:05:16.280
<v Speaker 1>great long run out of it. Okay, So if you're

0:05:16.279 --> 0:05:19.200
<v Speaker 1>born in nineteen sixty two, you're in high school when

0:05:19.200 --> 0:05:22.440
<v Speaker 1>the Apple two comes out? Were you an adherent of

0:05:22.480 --> 0:05:25.240
<v Speaker 1>computers in high school? I was, but not through uh

0:05:25.360 --> 0:05:27.800
<v Speaker 1>not through PCs. I was a little before and a

0:05:27.839 --> 0:05:29.799
<v Speaker 1>little after in a funny way. So my first computer

0:05:30.400 --> 0:05:35.520
<v Speaker 1>was a a programmable t I fifty eight computer, which

0:05:35.560 --> 0:05:37.320
<v Speaker 1>was not a computer at all. I was a calculator

0:05:37.560 --> 0:05:39.799
<v Speaker 1>with two hundred forty steps in it, so you literally

0:05:40.000 --> 0:05:41.919
<v Speaker 1>you had to learn how to really efficient code. That

0:05:41.960 --> 0:05:45.719
<v Speaker 1>was the first UH computing device that I owned. Uh

0:05:45.800 --> 0:05:47.920
<v Speaker 1>And and you could program it to do sort of

0:05:47.960 --> 0:05:50.600
<v Speaker 1>simulation kinds of things that had a little display. I

0:05:50.600 --> 0:05:53.480
<v Speaker 1>couldn't afford the expensive one with magnetic cards, but I

0:05:53.520 --> 0:05:56.440
<v Speaker 1>was able to save my money from shelving stone, raking

0:05:56.480 --> 0:05:58.520
<v Speaker 1>leaves and other stuff to where I got the printer

0:05:58.640 --> 0:06:01.360
<v Speaker 1>so I could actually save my programs and type them

0:06:01.400 --> 0:06:05.360
<v Speaker 1>back in meticulously, all two and forty instructions of them.

0:06:05.520 --> 0:06:08.680
<v Speaker 1>Then my senior in high school, Fieldston started time sharing

0:06:09.040 --> 0:06:11.320
<v Speaker 1>on another computer down the street at the school called

0:06:11.360 --> 0:06:14.440
<v Speaker 1>Riverdale UM. And so that was when I got first

0:06:14.440 --> 0:06:17.640
<v Speaker 1>got into any sort of serious interactive programming. Uh. It

0:06:17.680 --> 0:06:20.640
<v Speaker 1>was a PDP eleven thirty four. There ran an obscure

0:06:20.640 --> 0:06:24.200
<v Speaker 1>operating system called Ristus for any nerds out there, UM.

0:06:24.279 --> 0:06:26.839
<v Speaker 1>And the biggest thing that I did there was I

0:06:26.880 --> 0:06:30.520
<v Speaker 1>wrote a game that simulated running a presidential election called

0:06:30.560 --> 0:06:34.360
<v Speaker 1>pres and it became very popular, and it leveraged that popularity,

0:06:34.640 --> 0:06:36.360
<v Speaker 1>and I put a trojan horse in it that gave

0:06:36.400 --> 0:06:41.279
<v Speaker 1>me system access to the entire computer system. Okay, and

0:06:41.400 --> 0:06:44.320
<v Speaker 1>did you utilize that access to do bad or good?

0:06:44.640 --> 0:06:47.480
<v Speaker 1>I utilized it for because back in the day, hacker

0:06:47.520 --> 0:06:50.560
<v Speaker 1>meant something different than it means now. Hacker meant somebody

0:06:50.560 --> 0:06:53.680
<v Speaker 1>who had the curiosity, the pioneer spirit. Stephen Levi's book

0:06:53.720 --> 0:06:57.000
<v Speaker 1>Hacker describes this, and it was about like climbing the mountain.

0:06:57.240 --> 0:06:59.520
<v Speaker 1>The digital version of the Mountain. So I never did

0:06:59.560 --> 0:07:03.520
<v Speaker 1>anything malicious. I would basically there were there were fun

0:07:03.600 --> 0:07:06.200
<v Speaker 1>games on the system that you could play if you

0:07:06.240 --> 0:07:09.000
<v Speaker 1>had access to them, I would do that. Uh. So

0:07:09.240 --> 0:07:10.880
<v Speaker 1>the worst you could say is that I stole some

0:07:10.960 --> 0:07:15.520
<v Speaker 1>CPU cycles um from the from the Riverdale computer. I

0:07:15.560 --> 0:07:17.320
<v Speaker 1>did it with a buddy. I won't say his name,

0:07:17.360 --> 0:07:19.240
<v Speaker 1>but he ended up being our professor at m I

0:07:19.320 --> 0:07:23.000
<v Speaker 1>t so and uh a very accomplished person in his

0:07:23.040 --> 0:07:26.679
<v Speaker 1>own right. So apparently we didn't We were not too

0:07:27.000 --> 0:07:30.440
<v Speaker 1>too bad, but but we had fun and I learned

0:07:30.440 --> 0:07:34.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot about programming computers. Uh and uh, I can

0:07:34.120 --> 0:07:36.880
<v Speaker 1>tell you a lot about bad computer operating system security

0:07:36.920 --> 0:07:40.000
<v Speaker 1>and trojan horses because the case did not have robust security.

0:07:40.200 --> 0:07:43.720
<v Speaker 1>So that computer terminal that you had access to the

0:07:43.720 --> 0:07:46.360
<v Speaker 1>main frame or mini computer whatever it was, that was

0:07:46.400 --> 0:07:48.360
<v Speaker 1>at school, that was in high school. That was my

0:07:48.640 --> 0:07:50.760
<v Speaker 1>that was my first experience. My my first experience in

0:07:50.800 --> 0:07:54.120
<v Speaker 1>owning our computer was in one when the IBM PC

0:07:54.320 --> 0:07:55.960
<v Speaker 1>came out. But that was I was alarading. Okay, but

0:07:56.000 --> 0:07:58.280
<v Speaker 1>before your college. So when you're at Fieldston, would you

0:07:58.280 --> 0:08:02.280
<v Speaker 1>stay after school to use that computer it was it?

0:08:02.320 --> 0:08:05.520
<v Speaker 1>Would you track your relationship with a computer in school

0:08:05.560 --> 0:08:09.360
<v Speaker 1>somewhat similarly to what Bill Gates says his experience was.

0:08:09.520 --> 0:08:12.280
<v Speaker 1>So I didn't in beak between between the program blow

0:08:12.320 --> 0:08:16.000
<v Speaker 1>calculator that I owned and my access to the the

0:08:16.040 --> 0:08:19.160
<v Speaker 1>PDP eleven thirty four through a time sharing terminal. I

0:08:19.400 --> 0:08:21.160
<v Speaker 1>um I got. I don't know if I got my

0:08:21.200 --> 0:08:23.440
<v Speaker 1>full ten thousand hours, and but I definitely got a

0:08:23.480 --> 0:08:25.880
<v Speaker 1>decent amount of computing experience. We also, by the way

0:08:25.880 --> 0:08:27.360
<v Speaker 1>we had it, we had a PDP I forgot. My

0:08:27.400 --> 0:08:29.880
<v Speaker 1>whole Sky school had a PDP eight before the PDP

0:08:29.920 --> 0:08:33.320
<v Speaker 1>eleven thirty four, which had a one tin bawd teletype,

0:08:33.360 --> 0:08:34.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, the old like you know, something out of

0:08:34.720 --> 0:08:38.120
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and one, with the with the he's clanging

0:08:38.120 --> 0:08:41.280
<v Speaker 1>and the uh, the loud teletype. Uh. The only thing

0:08:41.320 --> 0:08:43.880
<v Speaker 1>about that was the computer would reboot when you plug

0:08:43.920 --> 0:08:46.480
<v Speaker 1>the coffee pot in. So it really wasn't that robust

0:08:46.480 --> 0:08:48.920
<v Speaker 1>a computer. So I dinked out with that a little bit.

0:08:49.080 --> 0:08:52.880
<v Speaker 1>But it was really the the my own calculator and

0:08:52.880 --> 0:08:55.800
<v Speaker 1>the other one where my main computing experence. And you know,

0:08:55.960 --> 0:08:58.040
<v Speaker 1>by I'm a little bit older than you. I was

0:08:58.080 --> 0:09:00.280
<v Speaker 1>born in nineteen fifty three, and then people are younger.

0:09:00.800 --> 0:09:04.520
<v Speaker 1>But there was really class division in my high school,

0:09:04.520 --> 0:09:06.920
<v Speaker 1>but it was much larger than your high school. When

0:09:06.960 --> 0:09:09.920
<v Speaker 1>you're pursuing your love of computers, does that make you

0:09:09.960 --> 0:09:13.720
<v Speaker 1>an ostracized nerd or does that include you in the class?

0:09:14.000 --> 0:09:16.880
<v Speaker 1>So this I had different things I did. So when

0:09:16.880 --> 0:09:18.960
<v Speaker 1>I before I started this, I started a radio station

0:09:19.000 --> 0:09:21.960
<v Speaker 1>in my high school. Uh, and that was that was fun.

0:09:22.000 --> 0:09:23.840
<v Speaker 1>I just did because I loved radio. Actually when I

0:09:23.840 --> 0:09:25.240
<v Speaker 1>went when I when I was twelve, I went to

0:09:25.280 --> 0:09:28.640
<v Speaker 1>a summer camp and my camp counselor was a a

0:09:28.760 --> 0:09:31.920
<v Speaker 1>d J at w N y C. I think it

0:09:32.000 --> 0:09:35.040
<v Speaker 1>was the City College, uh station, And I thought it

0:09:35.040 --> 0:09:37.840
<v Speaker 1>was was it was that a classical station back then? Uh? No, No,

0:09:37.920 --> 0:09:39.800
<v Speaker 1>this was it was like an all format station. Was

0:09:39.840 --> 0:09:41.599
<v Speaker 1>that it was a SID No, no, w CC, it

0:09:41.679 --> 0:09:43.680
<v Speaker 1>was a it was the City College in New York station.

0:09:43.720 --> 0:09:45.200
<v Speaker 1>So not even I see c C and Y or

0:09:45.200 --> 0:09:47.280
<v Speaker 1>something like that. And so I went and visited his

0:09:47.400 --> 0:09:50.280
<v Speaker 1>radio station, uh that next fall, and I thought it

0:09:50.320 --> 0:09:52.280
<v Speaker 1>was the coolest thing in the world. So I got

0:09:52.320 --> 0:09:55.480
<v Speaker 1>my we we ended up setting up a intercom radio

0:09:55.559 --> 0:09:58.000
<v Speaker 1>station in high school. When I did that, when I

0:09:58.040 --> 0:10:00.319
<v Speaker 1>was like a sophomore junior. How much techno? Well know,

0:10:00.400 --> 0:10:02.360
<v Speaker 1>how did that know? It was more of the inspiration.

0:10:02.440 --> 0:10:04.280
<v Speaker 1>It was more of the inspiration. It wasn't super technical.

0:10:04.320 --> 0:10:05.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean it was literally we didn't get it. We

0:10:05.920 --> 0:10:08.760
<v Speaker 1>didn't get a low watching license. We just literally wired

0:10:08.800 --> 0:10:11.320
<v Speaker 1>the building from the UH from the when we were

0:10:11.320 --> 0:10:14.120
<v Speaker 1>into the gymnasium in the cafeteria. So it was basically

0:10:14.160 --> 0:10:17.600
<v Speaker 1>doing radio over wired lines, basically what I ended up

0:10:17.600 --> 0:10:20.600
<v Speaker 1>doing twenty years later when we started real networks, but

0:10:20.800 --> 0:10:22.840
<v Speaker 1>not used. The Internet didn't exist then, so we just

0:10:22.920 --> 0:10:27.319
<v Speaker 1>wired it ourselves. Okay, so you end up going to Yale.

0:10:28.000 --> 0:10:30.280
<v Speaker 1>Where else did you apply to college? I actually only

0:10:30.320 --> 0:10:33.000
<v Speaker 1>applied to two places. I applied to Yale and a

0:10:33.000 --> 0:10:35.480
<v Speaker 1>little college and Iowa called Grinnell. And the reason I

0:10:35.520 --> 0:10:39.440
<v Speaker 1>applied to Grinnell was um I thought after being growing

0:10:39.480 --> 0:10:42.000
<v Speaker 1>up in New York and thinking I didn't necessarily want to, like,

0:10:42.160 --> 0:10:44.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, follow all the whole sort of snobby elitist

0:10:44.760 --> 0:10:47.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of stuff that you associate with the Northeast and

0:10:47.200 --> 0:10:50.480
<v Speaker 1>the I vs. UH. One of the inventors, one of

0:10:50.480 --> 0:10:52.240
<v Speaker 1>the inventor of the integrated circle, one of the early

0:10:52.240 --> 0:10:55.200
<v Speaker 1>people in Intel, was a Grinnell graduate and so in

0:10:55.240 --> 0:10:57.520
<v Speaker 1>the late seventies, Grinnell had one of the best funded

0:10:57.720 --> 0:11:00.400
<v Speaker 1>computer science facilities of any small liberal arts college in

0:11:00.440 --> 0:11:03.360
<v Speaker 1>the country. UH and I had. I went and visited Grinnell,

0:11:03.720 --> 0:11:06.200
<v Speaker 1>had a lovely time, was super fun. But I made

0:11:06.200 --> 0:11:09.240
<v Speaker 1>the purely pragmatic decision that if I hated Yale and

0:11:09.240 --> 0:11:11.160
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to switch to Grinnell, they would have be

0:11:11.240 --> 0:11:13.880
<v Speaker 1>with open arms U. Whereas if I went the other

0:11:13.880 --> 0:11:16.520
<v Speaker 1>way and I turned down YELLEH went to Grinnelle and

0:11:16.520 --> 0:11:18.280
<v Speaker 1>tried to get back into Yelle, they'd flipped me the bird.

0:11:18.600 --> 0:11:20.320
<v Speaker 1>So I figured the right thing to do was to

0:11:20.720 --> 0:11:22.880
<v Speaker 1>pick the pick the I like them both, and I

0:11:22.920 --> 0:11:25.200
<v Speaker 1>picked the one that seemed like if I didn't like it,

0:11:25.240 --> 0:11:27.280
<v Speaker 1>I could twitch to the other one. And UH and

0:11:27.320 --> 0:11:29.200
<v Speaker 1>I ended up having a great time. So you did

0:11:29.280 --> 0:11:31.720
<v Speaker 1>have a good experience in college. Fantastic I was. It

0:11:31.760 --> 0:11:34.080
<v Speaker 1>was and I actually by the time I went there,

0:11:34.120 --> 0:11:37.000
<v Speaker 1>I felt really good about it. My UH sister, who

0:11:37.000 --> 0:11:38.640
<v Speaker 1>was two years older, a couple of her one of

0:11:38.640 --> 0:11:40.000
<v Speaker 1>her friends going to Yale, and went up and hung

0:11:40.040 --> 0:11:42.040
<v Speaker 1>out with them, and it was like it was a

0:11:42.040 --> 0:11:44.280
<v Speaker 1>revelation to find a place where like being a nerd

0:11:44.480 --> 0:11:47.400
<v Speaker 1>was kind of cool, at least not as ostracized as

0:11:47.440 --> 0:11:50.679
<v Speaker 1>at Ostracigo Strong. It was not in the cultural mainstream

0:11:50.679 --> 0:11:52.800
<v Speaker 1>in my high school to be a nerd like it was,

0:11:53.040 --> 0:11:55.480
<v Speaker 1>but whereas college, it was a college full and nerds,

0:11:55.520 --> 0:11:57.440
<v Speaker 1>so it felt they were different kinds of nerds, not

0:11:57.480 --> 0:12:01.400
<v Speaker 1>all computer nerds, some or math nerds to different things. Uh.

0:12:01.400 --> 0:12:03.800
<v Speaker 1>The other thing was helpful is so in I was

0:12:03.840 --> 0:12:05.400
<v Speaker 1>good at math, but there was a kid named Paul

0:12:05.440 --> 0:12:07.920
<v Speaker 1>Quintus who was the best in math in my school,

0:12:08.160 --> 0:12:10.480
<v Speaker 1>and there were a few of us. Jason was before

0:12:10.480 --> 0:12:12.360
<v Speaker 1>he started becoming a stoner, was super smart at math.

0:12:12.400 --> 0:12:13.760
<v Speaker 1>Who there are a few of us who were like

0:12:13.880 --> 0:12:16.640
<v Speaker 1>vibed for second best in math. So I never had

0:12:16.679 --> 0:12:18.680
<v Speaker 1>the image that I had to become a pure mathematician.

0:12:19.040 --> 0:12:20.960
<v Speaker 1>But then at Yale, I started, Okay, I'm gonna see

0:12:20.960 --> 0:12:22.880
<v Speaker 1>what I can do. So I started in the early

0:12:22.920 --> 0:12:26.960
<v Speaker 1>Concentration math program, which was like the hardest program. Had

0:12:26.960 --> 0:12:28.400
<v Speaker 1>to take the AP and all that stuff to get in,

0:12:28.600 --> 0:12:30.520
<v Speaker 1>and it started out with about fifteen people in it,

0:12:30.760 --> 0:12:33.040
<v Speaker 1>and after two weeks everybody had dropped out except for

0:12:33.160 --> 0:12:35.400
<v Speaker 1>me and five guys who knew each other from math

0:12:35.480 --> 0:12:38.280
<v Speaker 1>camp um, which I had not gone to. Uh, So

0:12:38.360 --> 0:12:41.240
<v Speaker 1>I was nerdy, but not uber nerdy, I guess and

0:12:41.400 --> 0:12:43.760
<v Speaker 1>uh And it was really a revelation for me because

0:12:43.760 --> 0:12:46.400
<v Speaker 1>I was clearly the worst of the six of us UM.

0:12:46.400 --> 0:12:48.800
<v Speaker 1>And it was a really good thing to learn that, uh,

0:12:48.840 --> 0:12:50.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, at the age of still seventeen, I think,

0:12:50.720 --> 0:12:53.000
<v Speaker 1>and then turn eighteen yet that I would not be

0:12:53.120 --> 0:12:57.000
<v Speaker 1>hurting society by not being a theoretical mathematician because there

0:12:57.000 --> 0:12:59.199
<v Speaker 1>were five people in the room with me who were

0:12:59.200 --> 0:13:02.000
<v Speaker 1>far better theory mathematicians and me just in that one

0:13:02.120 --> 0:13:04.720
<v Speaker 1>room in one class at Yale. So it was a

0:13:04.760 --> 0:13:07.040
<v Speaker 1>liberation for me that I could go do other stuff

0:13:07.360 --> 0:13:09.000
<v Speaker 1>that built on the fact that I was pretty good

0:13:09.000 --> 0:13:11.360
<v Speaker 1>at math without having to go to the purest route,

0:13:11.360 --> 0:13:14.840
<v Speaker 1>which of course academia almost always steers you towards, like

0:13:14.840 --> 0:13:17.080
<v Speaker 1>if you're really, really good, you do the purest form

0:13:17.120 --> 0:13:19.840
<v Speaker 1>of something, and then if you're you know, if you're

0:13:19.880 --> 0:13:21.679
<v Speaker 1>not able to cut cut it in the purest thing,

0:13:21.840 --> 0:13:24.480
<v Speaker 1>you can do something more philistine like being business. So

0:13:24.640 --> 0:13:27.760
<v Speaker 1>for me, I got that UM feedback early on, and

0:13:28.120 --> 0:13:31.240
<v Speaker 1>it was quite liberating for me. Okay, so you wake

0:13:31.360 --> 0:13:32.599
<v Speaker 1>up one day and you say you're not gonna be

0:13:32.640 --> 0:13:34.600
<v Speaker 1>the head of the class in math. What are your

0:13:34.640 --> 0:13:37.439
<v Speaker 1>other interests in college? So it was a combine a

0:13:37.480 --> 0:13:39.360
<v Speaker 1>bunch of things. I was always sitting media, but in

0:13:39.440 --> 0:13:42.120
<v Speaker 1>college I did it by getting involved in the student newspaper,

0:13:42.160 --> 0:13:44.880
<v Speaker 1>the All Daily News. I got involved in student activism,

0:13:44.880 --> 0:13:48.480
<v Speaker 1>and I was pretty politically active because night was when

0:13:48.520 --> 0:13:50.480
<v Speaker 1>Reagan came in. There was a lot of you know,

0:13:50.640 --> 0:13:52.880
<v Speaker 1>saber rattling going on. I didn't like that very much.

0:13:53.440 --> 0:13:55.840
<v Speaker 1>So I got I was sort of a student activist

0:13:55.920 --> 0:14:00.760
<v Speaker 1>in a bunch of anti military, anti militaristic ninety military

0:14:00.840 --> 0:14:04.559
<v Speaker 1>excuse me, anti militaristic, anti jingoistic, uh, you know, anti

0:14:04.640 --> 0:14:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Reagan kinds of things, uh. In college, and I throw that.

0:14:07.880 --> 0:14:10.640
<v Speaker 1>I got involved with writing editorials in the student newspaper,

0:14:11.000 --> 0:14:13.080
<v Speaker 1>and a bunch of these friends are like, hey, we

0:14:13.160 --> 0:14:15.640
<v Speaker 1>like you would you've wrote a column for us UM

0:14:15.760 --> 0:14:17.960
<v Speaker 1>And so I wrote a column for two or three

0:14:18.000 --> 0:14:20.960
<v Speaker 1>years in college called What's Left? Uh. And then the

0:14:21.000 --> 0:14:22.680
<v Speaker 1>funny thing about it is the guy who wrote the

0:14:22.680 --> 0:14:25.040
<v Speaker 1>column right of Way has actually become a good friend

0:14:25.040 --> 0:14:27.840
<v Speaker 1>of mine, a guy named David from So David David,

0:14:27.840 --> 0:14:29.800
<v Speaker 1>and I wrote, I didn't know that David from David

0:14:29.840 --> 0:14:33.240
<v Speaker 1>and David was like the point counterpoint of this. Uh

0:14:33.400 --> 0:14:35.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, And so I would I wrote the left

0:14:35.400 --> 0:14:37.800
<v Speaker 1>wing column, he wrote the right wing column. I would

0:14:37.800 --> 0:14:40.040
<v Speaker 1>think I wrote one that was a kind of a

0:14:40.040 --> 0:14:42.040
<v Speaker 1>headline that was a little nasty, as I recall, it

0:14:42.120 --> 0:14:47.640
<v Speaker 1>was from colon distortions, misrespsentations and lies. Um. But we've

0:14:47.760 --> 0:14:50.040
<v Speaker 1>since buried the hatchet on that. And well he's also

0:14:50.120 --> 0:14:53.560
<v Speaker 1>moved left. Well he he's moved. He's moved sensible at least,

0:14:53.560 --> 0:14:55.720
<v Speaker 1>I would say. And he and I when I got

0:14:55.760 --> 0:14:57.520
<v Speaker 1>involved many years later and a bunch of stuff around

0:14:57.600 --> 0:14:59.960
<v Speaker 1>Putin and Trump. Uh, David was one of the firs

0:15:00.000 --> 0:15:01.880
<v Speaker 1>as people I talked about, and he ran along piece

0:15:01.880 --> 0:15:04.480
<v Speaker 1>in Atlantic about it. And so we've stayed, we've our

0:15:04.520 --> 0:15:06.600
<v Speaker 1>lives have intertwined in a funny way. In college, we

0:15:06.600 --> 0:15:09.480
<v Speaker 1>were pretty pretty different views. And then he I think

0:15:09.480 --> 0:15:11.200
<v Speaker 1>you have to doing penance for the whole access of

0:15:11.200 --> 0:15:13.960
<v Speaker 1>evil thing, because he's famously one of the person I

0:15:13.960 --> 0:15:17.120
<v Speaker 1>think he's the person who coined that phrase. Uh he Uh,

0:15:17.200 --> 0:15:20.280
<v Speaker 1>he's now obviously changed his views of that part of

0:15:20.280 --> 0:15:23.000
<v Speaker 1>the Republican Party. Anyway, So you say you got your

0:15:23.000 --> 0:15:26.000
<v Speaker 1>first computer at nineteen and IBM PC what was the

0:15:26.040 --> 0:15:29.200
<v Speaker 1>inspiration for that? So luck? Luck always plays a role

0:15:29.240 --> 0:15:30.680
<v Speaker 1>in life. So in the summer of eighty one, I

0:15:30.720 --> 0:15:33.200
<v Speaker 1>went to work for IBM uh in Pokeepsie, New York,

0:15:33.200 --> 0:15:37.560
<v Speaker 1>who was a little slower. So you're this was this

0:15:37.600 --> 0:15:40.520
<v Speaker 1>is right after freshman year of college, after sophomore year,

0:15:40.640 --> 0:15:43.000
<v Speaker 1>after sophomore years. So how did you even get that gig?

0:15:43.400 --> 0:15:46.640
<v Speaker 1>It's actually interesting thing. So I I did computer programming

0:15:46.640 --> 0:15:48.600
<v Speaker 1>while I was I was. I ended up doing a

0:15:48.640 --> 0:15:51.160
<v Speaker 1>computer science degree and then a master degree in economics.

0:15:51.360 --> 0:15:55.000
<v Speaker 1>So I was sort of sprattling between those two fields. Okay, wait, wait, wait,

0:15:55.040 --> 0:15:59.520
<v Speaker 1>just you you start with math in N one to

0:15:59.680 --> 0:16:03.000
<v Speaker 1>what agree? Yale? Is there a computer science program? Y'all

0:16:03.040 --> 0:16:05.560
<v Speaker 1>had a good but small computer science program. It was

0:16:05.600 --> 0:16:08.760
<v Speaker 1>not It's not as large as certainly uh m I

0:16:08.800 --> 0:16:10.320
<v Speaker 1>T s or one of the other clothes. But it

0:16:10.360 --> 0:16:14.440
<v Speaker 1>had some really good professors. Uh a few, one of

0:16:14.480 --> 0:16:17.560
<v Speaker 1>the pioneers of early program language of Alan Perliss, who's

0:16:17.680 --> 0:16:20.800
<v Speaker 1>since passed away. Some really interesting people in there. But

0:16:20.840 --> 0:16:22.280
<v Speaker 1>it was a small program. I don't know. There were

0:16:22.280 --> 0:16:24.880
<v Speaker 1>maybe fifteen of US majors, maybe a little more than

0:16:24.920 --> 0:16:27.480
<v Speaker 1>that um and so I was doing computer science stuff

0:16:27.480 --> 0:16:29.360
<v Speaker 1>and then I was doing economics. And one of the

0:16:29.440 --> 0:16:32.080
<v Speaker 1>virtues of having done advanced math is you can start

0:16:32.080 --> 0:16:35.400
<v Speaker 1>doing advanced economics earlier, because basically the only difference, as

0:16:35.440 --> 0:16:38.080
<v Speaker 1>I can see between the graduate and the undergraduate economic

0:16:38.120 --> 0:16:42.160
<v Speaker 1>classes is the graduate economic classes assumed calculus in economics.

0:16:42.160 --> 0:16:43.720
<v Speaker 1>So I was able to kind of did you have

0:16:43.760 --> 0:16:45.760
<v Speaker 1>any vision of who would what you wanted to do

0:16:45.880 --> 0:16:48.480
<v Speaker 1>or be? I think I knew I wanted to do

0:16:48.520 --> 0:16:51.720
<v Speaker 1>something at the intersection of technology, media and politics, but

0:16:51.880 --> 0:16:54.160
<v Speaker 1>what the manifestation of that would be, and the fact

0:16:54.160 --> 0:16:58.000
<v Speaker 1>that it ended up involving more technology and media professionally

0:16:58.480 --> 0:17:01.360
<v Speaker 1>and more politics as a as an advocation rather than

0:17:01.360 --> 0:17:05.000
<v Speaker 1>a vocation, uh was It's sort of kind of how

0:17:05.000 --> 0:17:07.760
<v Speaker 1>it evolved. Part of it is when you do computer stuff,

0:17:07.800 --> 0:17:10.880
<v Speaker 1>you can get decent summer jobs that pay reasonably well.

0:17:10.920 --> 0:17:13.160
<v Speaker 1>And like so, I gotta I applied for a summer

0:17:13.200 --> 0:17:15.280
<v Speaker 1>job at IBM in the summer of eighty one, and

0:17:15.359 --> 0:17:17.840
<v Speaker 1>because one of the jobs they had at school involved

0:17:18.080 --> 0:17:21.280
<v Speaker 1>doing programming on an IBM main faw also my first

0:17:21.320 --> 0:17:23.560
<v Speaker 1>paid job. I worked at n y U the summer

0:17:23.560 --> 0:17:25.720
<v Speaker 1>after by senior in high school working on their computer.

0:17:26.080 --> 0:17:28.240
<v Speaker 1>So I did that my and doing what on their

0:17:28.280 --> 0:17:29.960
<v Speaker 1>computers it was for it was a computer for the

0:17:30.000 --> 0:17:33.840
<v Speaker 1>admissions department. So I was just doing regularly, regular random

0:17:33.840 --> 0:17:38.280
<v Speaker 1>programming assignments, you know, job running reports for a basic

0:17:38.359 --> 0:17:41.080
<v Speaker 1>for mini computer h on that the n y U

0:17:41.160 --> 0:17:44.000
<v Speaker 1>Admissions department had as their in house. Okay, when you

0:17:44.040 --> 0:17:46.679
<v Speaker 1>were at Fieldston, was there a teacher who taught you

0:17:46.720 --> 0:17:48.879
<v Speaker 1>this stuff? That we were all self taught? It was

0:17:48.920 --> 0:17:51.080
<v Speaker 1>a computer science. There were no teachers, so I taught.

0:17:51.119 --> 0:17:53.199
<v Speaker 1>I taught myself programming. But you know, if you know

0:17:53.320 --> 0:17:57.560
<v Speaker 1>math and you're you know, technically uh inclined, you know,

0:17:57.640 --> 0:17:59.600
<v Speaker 1>I didn't find learning programming was that hard. So my

0:17:59.640 --> 0:18:04.120
<v Speaker 1>first actual course in programming was freshman year in college probably.

0:18:04.440 --> 0:18:07.200
<v Speaker 1>And what was the language then? Uh? We learned everything

0:18:07.320 --> 0:18:10.240
<v Speaker 1>from you know, C that was before C plus plus

0:18:10.280 --> 0:18:13.320
<v Speaker 1>C two, A p L which was it's kind of

0:18:13.320 --> 0:18:16.359
<v Speaker 1>obscure sy mode language LISP, which was a natural language programming.

0:18:16.480 --> 0:18:19.280
<v Speaker 1>I did some Burgram for trand, which was more for

0:18:19.320 --> 0:18:23.400
<v Speaker 1>these applied jobs. Basic is obviously the presidential election simulators

0:18:23.400 --> 0:18:26.760
<v Speaker 1>slash Trudgan Horse was written in Basic, uh, which was

0:18:27.000 --> 0:18:30.639
<v Speaker 1>Basic was probably the first higher level language I wrote in. Okay,

0:18:30.720 --> 0:18:34.280
<v Speaker 1>So what is your gig after your sophomore year at IBM?

0:18:34.480 --> 0:18:36.800
<v Speaker 1>So I worked at IBM in a really boring job

0:18:37.119 --> 0:18:40.680
<v Speaker 1>in Pokeepsie, New York. UH in a group that wrote

0:18:41.520 --> 0:18:43.919
<v Speaker 1>IBM had a language called j c L that was

0:18:43.960 --> 0:18:47.159
<v Speaker 1>a language to batch program computers. And I came in

0:18:47.400 --> 0:18:49.720
<v Speaker 1>just I just missed having to work on punch cards.

0:18:49.720 --> 0:18:51.959
<v Speaker 1>I'm really lucky in that. But this was They had

0:18:51.960 --> 0:18:54.119
<v Speaker 1>a language called Jewel. I don't know, I remember that

0:18:54.160 --> 0:18:57.000
<v Speaker 1>because it's a prett obscure language that generated j c L.

0:18:57.440 --> 0:19:00.720
<v Speaker 1>So my job was to write programs in Jewel UH

0:19:00.760 --> 0:19:04.400
<v Speaker 1>that we were used for some set of maintenance programs

0:19:04.440 --> 0:19:06.480
<v Speaker 1>for the for the Maiden Rand group. The reason it

0:19:06.520 --> 0:19:08.399
<v Speaker 1>wasn't super boring is one of the guys in my

0:19:08.480 --> 0:19:11.520
<v Speaker 1>group that I was in in Pokeepsie, New York, happened

0:19:11.520 --> 0:19:13.720
<v Speaker 1>to be part of the task force that was working

0:19:13.760 --> 0:19:16.280
<v Speaker 1>on the IBM PC. So I got I get there

0:19:16.280 --> 0:19:18.280
<v Speaker 1>in June. Who getting lucky is better than good all

0:19:18.280 --> 0:19:21.080
<v Speaker 1>the time? I get there in June, or like Marylyn June,

0:19:21.240 --> 0:19:23.639
<v Speaker 1>and there about a month the IBM PC gets announced

0:19:23.800 --> 0:19:26.159
<v Speaker 1>and asked this guy Jim, and he knows everything was

0:19:26.200 --> 0:19:27.679
<v Speaker 1>to know about it. So he tells me all about it,

0:19:27.720 --> 0:19:30.200
<v Speaker 1>and I get super excited. I was never an Apple

0:19:30.280 --> 0:19:32.639
<v Speaker 1>two kid, as I mentioned that kind of sort of

0:19:32.680 --> 0:19:35.320
<v Speaker 1>generationally didn't quite line up with that. But I thought

0:19:35.320 --> 0:19:37.560
<v Speaker 1>the ibm PC seemed like it was going to be

0:19:37.600 --> 0:19:41.560
<v Speaker 1>a really good thing, uh in terms of like taking

0:19:41.600 --> 0:19:44.000
<v Speaker 1>the PC industry to the next level. And you can

0:19:44.040 --> 0:19:47.399
<v Speaker 1>say legitimizing and famously, Steve Jobs and Apple once ran

0:19:47.440 --> 0:19:49.640
<v Speaker 1>an ad you know what they said that people say,

0:19:49.680 --> 0:19:52.760
<v Speaker 1>the ibm PC is going to legitimize personal computing. Well

0:19:52.800 --> 0:19:55.360
<v Speaker 1>the bastards say welcome. So that was a famous ad

0:19:55.359 --> 0:19:58.879
<v Speaker 1>Apple ran. But I but it did have that vibe,

0:19:58.880 --> 0:20:00.480
<v Speaker 1>that feel and the culture. And this is going back,

0:20:00.680 --> 0:20:04.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, thirty seven years now. And so I, after

0:20:04.359 --> 0:20:07.080
<v Speaker 1>I finished my job summer job, with a bunch of buddies,

0:20:07.320 --> 0:20:10.640
<v Speaker 1>decided to start a little software company, which I called

0:20:10.680 --> 0:20:15.119
<v Speaker 1>Ivy Research, to make games for the ibm PC. So, okay,

0:20:15.160 --> 0:20:17.840
<v Speaker 1>so the ibm PC, I've already forgotten. It was introduced

0:20:17.840 --> 0:20:20.240
<v Speaker 1>exactly when it came out. It was just announced in

0:20:20.240 --> 0:20:22.560
<v Speaker 1>the summer of eighty one and at first became available

0:20:22.560 --> 0:20:25.200
<v Speaker 1>early in the fall Okay, so when you start this

0:20:25.320 --> 0:20:28.080
<v Speaker 1>ivy company, are you saying, oh, this will be fun

0:20:28.200 --> 0:20:32.119
<v Speaker 1>or you see dreams of riches a little bit of both,

0:20:32.200 --> 0:20:35.439
<v Speaker 1>but really more it'll be fun and we'll learn a lot,

0:20:35.920 --> 0:20:39.520
<v Speaker 1>uh and maybe it will become something. So basically bought

0:20:39.560 --> 0:20:43.520
<v Speaker 1>one PC, which I think I used most of my

0:20:43.520 --> 0:20:45.760
<v Speaker 1>summer job money to buy. I think one of the

0:20:45.760 --> 0:20:48.080
<v Speaker 1>other guys bought the printer or something like that. UM

0:20:48.119 --> 0:20:50.400
<v Speaker 1>in the in the we couldn't really we there were

0:20:50.440 --> 0:20:52.600
<v Speaker 1>originally half a dozen of us that got excited about it.

0:20:52.760 --> 0:20:54.639
<v Speaker 1>There were three of us who ended up working on

0:20:54.680 --> 0:20:57.000
<v Speaker 1>it full time. So my summer job in the summer

0:20:57.000 --> 0:20:59.640
<v Speaker 1>of eight two other than you a little political organizing

0:20:59.680 --> 0:21:02.320
<v Speaker 1>which I could talk about, was to write games for

0:21:02.359 --> 0:21:06.240
<v Speaker 1>the IBM PC UM and the game. We wrote two games.

0:21:06.240 --> 0:21:09.400
<v Speaker 1>My friends was a better programmer than me. Uh so

0:21:09.440 --> 0:21:12.000
<v Speaker 1>he wrote the libraries for both of them, and I

0:21:12.040 --> 0:21:14.399
<v Speaker 1>wrote one of them. Um he wrote the other. They

0:21:14.400 --> 0:21:18.520
<v Speaker 1>were called SLINKs and Viper and SLINKs is basically you

0:21:18.520 --> 0:21:20.800
<v Speaker 1>know the old snake game on the Nokia candybar phone.

0:21:21.000 --> 0:21:22.920
<v Speaker 1>It was that game, and it may have been the

0:21:22.960 --> 0:21:25.120
<v Speaker 1>first incarnation of it. I've never heard of an older one,

0:21:25.440 --> 0:21:27.200
<v Speaker 1>but it was the notion that you basically you run

0:21:27.200 --> 0:21:30.360
<v Speaker 1>around a maze and the longer that you you pick

0:21:30.480 --> 0:21:33.040
<v Speaker 1>up tokens, and the more tokens you get, the longer

0:21:33.080 --> 0:21:34.800
<v Speaker 1>the snake gets. And the goal is to get the

0:21:34.800 --> 0:21:37.800
<v Speaker 1>snake could be as long as possible without tripping into yourself.

0:21:37.960 --> 0:21:40.520
<v Speaker 1>It's fun game. And that was one of our games.

0:21:40.920 --> 0:21:43.320
<v Speaker 1>And uh we sold them nationally through a chain of

0:21:43.320 --> 0:21:47.280
<v Speaker 1>computer stores called computer Land. UH and so I mentioned

0:21:47.320 --> 0:21:50.280
<v Speaker 1>all these old defunct names. Um and if you do

0:21:50.400 --> 0:21:52.920
<v Speaker 1>the math on it, the three of us made enough

0:21:52.960 --> 0:21:55.240
<v Speaker 1>money to make it a good summer job, but not

0:21:55.359 --> 0:21:58.439
<v Speaker 1>a life changing event. So it was like that was

0:21:58.720 --> 0:22:00.840
<v Speaker 1>that was our we It's the summer of eight t

0:22:00.880 --> 0:22:02.320
<v Speaker 1>two and then a little bit into the fall, and

0:22:02.400 --> 0:22:04.600
<v Speaker 1>then I got busy getting ready to graduate and finishing

0:22:04.600 --> 0:22:10.800
<v Speaker 1>with my school work. We'll take a quick break and

0:22:10.920 --> 0:22:13.439
<v Speaker 1>come back with more of my conversation with CEO of

0:22:13.480 --> 0:22:17.200
<v Speaker 1>Real Networks, Rob Glazer, recorded live at the Music Media

0:22:17.240 --> 0:22:21.840
<v Speaker 1>Summit in Santa Barbara, California. This week. I'm speaking with

0:22:21.960 --> 0:22:25.200
<v Speaker 1>Real Networks Rob Glazer. Over the last couple of months,

0:22:25.240 --> 0:22:27.760
<v Speaker 1>I've interviewed Tony Hawk and the head of music for

0:22:27.800 --> 0:22:30.919
<v Speaker 1>YouTube and Google Lee or Cone. Be the first to

0:22:30.960 --> 0:22:34.560
<v Speaker 1>hear next week's episode by subscribing to the podcast I'm

0:22:34.600 --> 0:22:38.879
<v Speaker 1>tuned in, Apple Podcast or your podcast Apple Choice. While

0:22:38.880 --> 0:22:43.160
<v Speaker 1>you're there, please rate and review the podcast. Okay, let's

0:22:43.160 --> 0:22:47.840
<v Speaker 1>get back to my conversation with Rob Glazer. Okay, So

0:22:48.520 --> 0:22:52.159
<v Speaker 1>you have the experience with the IBM PC, you graduate,

0:22:52.240 --> 0:22:54.639
<v Speaker 1>and then you go to graduate school. No. No, I

0:22:54.680 --> 0:22:57.520
<v Speaker 1>was lucky because of my head certain math. I was

0:22:57.600 --> 0:23:00.440
<v Speaker 1>able to do the master's degree at an economic concurrent

0:23:00.480 --> 0:23:02.560
<v Speaker 1>with the bachelor green computer science. So I was able

0:23:02.600 --> 0:23:04.639
<v Speaker 1>to do all that in four years. And what was

0:23:04.680 --> 0:23:08.720
<v Speaker 1>your thinking getting a master's in economics? So I thought

0:23:08.760 --> 0:23:10.240
<v Speaker 1>about whether or not I wanted to go get a

0:23:10.280 --> 0:23:15.199
<v Speaker 1>PhD in economics, and I didn't know. I loved the

0:23:15.560 --> 0:23:19.280
<v Speaker 1>questions that economics addresses. How do we create a just society? Uh?

0:23:19.320 --> 0:23:22.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, how do you what? What's the source of wealth? Uh?

0:23:22.080 --> 0:23:24.200
<v Speaker 1>You know, how? What's the fairest way to distribute things?

0:23:24.200 --> 0:23:26.560
<v Speaker 1>What's the right how to markets work? But I didn't

0:23:26.600 --> 0:23:30.560
<v Speaker 1>end up liking the methodology that academia uses in economics.

0:23:30.600 --> 0:23:33.480
<v Speaker 1>It seemed very abstract and a historical by and large,

0:23:33.800 --> 0:23:36.120
<v Speaker 1>So I really by the time I graduated, I thought,

0:23:36.119 --> 0:23:37.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm just gonna go out in the world. But what

0:23:38.000 --> 0:23:41.400
<v Speaker 1>my master's thesis was on the job market for academic economists,

0:23:41.880 --> 0:23:44.840
<v Speaker 1>because I thought, how can I It's a market, right,

0:23:45.080 --> 0:23:48.000
<v Speaker 1>And I thought, how can I uh learned about what

0:23:48.080 --> 0:23:50.520
<v Speaker 1>it's like to be an academic economist. I know, I'll

0:23:50.560 --> 0:23:52.800
<v Speaker 1>write a paper about them. So I did a survey

0:23:52.840 --> 0:23:55.720
<v Speaker 1>about how the market worked and how the structural market worked. Um,

0:23:56.040 --> 0:23:57.600
<v Speaker 1>and by then I was clear I didn't want to

0:23:57.640 --> 0:23:59.840
<v Speaker 1>go do that. Uh. So I thought about what I

0:23:59.880 --> 0:24:02.320
<v Speaker 1>was going to do next. Uh And I so, what

0:24:02.359 --> 0:24:05.560
<v Speaker 1>did you determine? What was the market for academic It's

0:24:05.600 --> 0:24:07.760
<v Speaker 1>a very self referential market, in other words, as a

0:24:07.800 --> 0:24:11.879
<v Speaker 1>market where reputation carries a huge amount of weight. And

0:24:11.920 --> 0:24:15.840
<v Speaker 1>you look at the feedback loop of which graduate programs

0:24:15.960 --> 0:24:19.040
<v Speaker 1>place people in which academic institution. Now this was, you know,

0:24:19.119 --> 0:24:22.359
<v Speaker 1>thirty five years ago, so it may have changed, although

0:24:22.359 --> 0:24:25.440
<v Speaker 1>I doubt it that. Uh. You know, over a long

0:24:25.440 --> 0:24:27.399
<v Speaker 1>period of time. You might say the cream risers at

0:24:27.440 --> 0:24:32.000
<v Speaker 1>the top. But insofar as the best people uh go

0:24:32.040 --> 0:24:34.520
<v Speaker 1>to the best schools, it's fine. But it tends to

0:24:34.560 --> 0:24:38.240
<v Speaker 1>provide a lot of sort of feedback around orthodoxy where

0:24:38.280 --> 0:24:41.960
<v Speaker 1>the best professor's best students get the best jobs as

0:24:41.960 --> 0:24:45.040
<v Speaker 1>sort of the pattern that emerged, which is okay. At

0:24:45.080 --> 0:24:48.080
<v Speaker 1>this late date, there's a huge division between the left

0:24:48.080 --> 0:24:50.000
<v Speaker 1>and the right read Paul Krugman the New York Times

0:24:50.119 --> 0:24:52.520
<v Speaker 1>is one thing, and we have all the economists backing

0:24:52.560 --> 0:24:55.919
<v Speaker 1>up the right wing. What's your viewpoint on this, on

0:24:55.920 --> 0:24:59.840
<v Speaker 1>on the degree to which economics it can be used

0:24:59.840 --> 0:25:02.920
<v Speaker 1>as justification? Right now, we're in a it's a very

0:25:02.920 --> 0:25:06.600
<v Speaker 1>weird world because we're in such a a world where

0:25:06.600 --> 0:25:09.520
<v Speaker 1>there's the division is not between the academic left and

0:25:09.520 --> 0:25:13.640
<v Speaker 1>the academic right. The it's between people who are scienced

0:25:13.680 --> 0:25:16.320
<v Speaker 1>and fact based and people who are know nothings. So

0:25:16.760 --> 0:25:18.720
<v Speaker 1>you know nothings in the old American condition of nothing.

0:25:18.840 --> 0:25:23.520
<v Speaker 1>So when you look at the degree to which the

0:25:24.359 --> 0:25:27.679
<v Speaker 1>tax cut, for instance, is being justified on academic on

0:25:27.760 --> 0:25:30.800
<v Speaker 1>academic economic grounds, that's not really the case anymore. You

0:25:30.800 --> 0:25:33.439
<v Speaker 1>look at the deficits, right, the fact that the right

0:25:33.440 --> 0:25:35.760
<v Speaker 1>wing said they hate deficits, but they have now passed

0:25:35.800 --> 0:25:37.560
<v Speaker 1>the tax bill that's going to blow up the deficit

0:25:37.840 --> 0:25:39.639
<v Speaker 1>to a higher level than it's ever been before, at

0:25:39.640 --> 0:25:41.840
<v Speaker 1>a faster rate than you've ever seen outside of an

0:25:41.880 --> 0:25:45.480
<v Speaker 1>economic depression. Ever, so right now, I actually don't really

0:25:45.480 --> 0:25:47.760
<v Speaker 1>think when you look at what's going on, um in

0:25:47.840 --> 0:25:52.800
<v Speaker 1>the economy, Uh, we were was a strong economy before Trump.

0:25:52.840 --> 0:25:55.200
<v Speaker 1>They've you know, added a little bit of uh of

0:25:55.480 --> 0:25:58.280
<v Speaker 1>of you know, put some more sugar in the in

0:25:58.359 --> 0:26:00.240
<v Speaker 1>the in the coffee to make it even sweet, or

0:26:00.520 --> 0:26:03.280
<v Speaker 1>uh not doing a way that's sustainable. I don't think

0:26:03.320 --> 0:26:05.480
<v Speaker 1>most academic conicts would say that that's what you should

0:26:05.520 --> 0:26:08.199
<v Speaker 1>have done. But people who like low tax rates for

0:26:08.240 --> 0:26:11.760
<v Speaker 1>corporations are very happy and staying on the same point

0:26:11.760 --> 0:26:14.600
<v Speaker 1>of know nothings in fact base. Is there any hope

0:26:14.600 --> 0:26:18.600
<v Speaker 1>for America both in terms of the top level arguing

0:26:18.640 --> 0:26:21.800
<v Speaker 1>and the people you know in the hinder lands moving

0:26:21.840 --> 0:26:25.000
<v Speaker 1>back towards facts. Are we on this divergent path and

0:26:24.960 --> 0:26:27.800
<v Speaker 1>it will sustain? I think it could go either way.

0:26:27.840 --> 0:26:30.879
<v Speaker 1>I mean I'm pretty uh generally an optimist, but in

0:26:30.920 --> 0:26:34.359
<v Speaker 1>the present time, Um, you know, you've always had political

0:26:34.359 --> 0:26:36.560
<v Speaker 1>division in this country, you know. But and I didn't

0:26:36.560 --> 0:26:39.480
<v Speaker 1>like Reagan very much, although in hindsight, the worst thing

0:26:39.520 --> 0:26:42.120
<v Speaker 1>he did in terms of creating a huge military conflict

0:26:42.359 --> 0:26:46.000
<v Speaker 1>was invading Grenada, So you know that was a pretty Uh.

0:26:46.160 --> 0:26:47.879
<v Speaker 1>You know, that was a pretty mild thing to do.

0:26:48.040 --> 0:26:49.840
<v Speaker 1>You know, you knocked over a few palm trees, and

0:26:50.080 --> 0:26:52.639
<v Speaker 1>you know, maybe maybe one or two people got their

0:26:52.640 --> 0:26:55.719
<v Speaker 1>noses broken or something. But compared to you know, some

0:26:55.800 --> 0:26:57.520
<v Speaker 1>of the really bad worst we've had since then, it

0:26:57.600 --> 0:27:01.240
<v Speaker 1>wasn't that pernicious. Uh. You know then you uh uh

0:27:01.280 --> 0:27:05.040
<v Speaker 1>George H. W. Bush, who you know, did some really

0:27:05.119 --> 0:27:08.959
<v Speaker 1>horrible things, but uh, ultimately the system worked and the

0:27:08.960 --> 0:27:12.360
<v Speaker 1>pendulum swung back. Uh. And then with Obama, I think

0:27:12.400 --> 0:27:15.560
<v Speaker 1>what happened was there was a lot of people who

0:27:15.640 --> 0:27:19.480
<v Speaker 1>got freaked out by the fact that this uh, the

0:27:19.480 --> 0:27:23.240
<v Speaker 1>the the change, the visual change, and the of having

0:27:23.840 --> 0:27:28.160
<v Speaker 1>an African American president, which in my view was a

0:27:28.200 --> 0:27:31.240
<v Speaker 1>sign of society being a fundamentally healthy place and a

0:27:31.320 --> 0:27:33.040
<v Speaker 1>very positive thing. And I still think he's the best

0:27:33.040 --> 0:27:35.919
<v Speaker 1>president of my lifetime. Uh, But but that there were

0:27:35.920 --> 0:27:37.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people who really freaked out about that,

0:27:38.240 --> 0:27:40.199
<v Speaker 1>and that created an environment when you look at they

0:27:40.200 --> 0:27:43.240
<v Speaker 1>were freaked out about what the fact that somebody who

0:27:43.280 --> 0:27:45.800
<v Speaker 1>doesn't look like them got to be president, and they

0:27:45.680 --> 0:27:48.840
<v Speaker 1>that's you know, you whether whether it's because there was

0:27:48.960 --> 0:27:50.679
<v Speaker 1>there's all these studies that are coming out now that

0:27:51.080 --> 0:27:53.439
<v Speaker 1>status anxiety was a huge motivator of a lot of

0:27:53.440 --> 0:27:56.640
<v Speaker 1>the Trump supporters, and the status anxiety has an economic

0:27:56.680 --> 0:27:58.720
<v Speaker 1>element to it, But also want to explain what you

0:27:59.000 --> 0:28:02.800
<v Speaker 1>for my audience, what lot of anxiety as well. Basically,

0:28:02.800 --> 0:28:05.480
<v Speaker 1>the people are afraid that they're they're not going to

0:28:05.520 --> 0:28:08.560
<v Speaker 1>be able to maintain their life situation, be it financially

0:28:08.680 --> 0:28:11.760
<v Speaker 1>or be its social prestiges, and that that those kinds

0:28:11.800 --> 0:28:14.119
<v Speaker 1>of fears get played on in all kinds of different

0:28:14.160 --> 0:28:18.320
<v Speaker 1>ways by uh, uh you know, by by people who

0:28:18.359 --> 0:28:22.160
<v Speaker 1>are you know, fearmongers or uh you know, various kinds

0:28:22.200 --> 0:28:25.800
<v Speaker 1>of uh whistle dog whistleblowers, And a lot of what

0:28:25.880 --> 0:28:28.560
<v Speaker 1>happened with Trump has been a lot of that sort

0:28:28.600 --> 0:28:32.200
<v Speaker 1>of uh rhetoric, in my view, combined with the fact

0:28:32.240 --> 0:28:35.080
<v Speaker 1>that when the economic recovery happened, you know, there's all

0:28:35.080 --> 0:28:37.280
<v Speaker 1>these things that happened with two that's sixteen, but it

0:28:37.359 --> 0:28:39.600
<v Speaker 1>was when the economic recovery happened, it happened on the

0:28:39.640 --> 0:28:41.600
<v Speaker 1>coast very well, and it happened in the middle country,

0:28:42.120 --> 0:28:45.280
<v Speaker 1>uh much much less comprehensively, and a lot of people

0:28:45.600 --> 0:28:50.040
<v Speaker 1>that had solid middle class lives with union jobs, they

0:28:50.040 --> 0:28:54.640
<v Speaker 1>don't have those union jobs anymore, and ironically, the the

0:28:54.800 --> 0:28:57.120
<v Speaker 1>economy is getting gutted in a way that makes it

0:28:57.240 --> 0:28:59.760
<v Speaker 1>much much harder for people who aren't college educated and

0:28:59.840 --> 0:29:03.160
<v Speaker 1>or living in you know, the wealthier coastal cities to

0:29:03.160 --> 0:29:06.880
<v Speaker 1>to to make it. And that the that created an

0:29:06.920 --> 0:29:10.080
<v Speaker 1>environment where people who were chingo istic are people who

0:29:10.080 --> 0:29:14.960
<v Speaker 1>are willing to manipulate the truth uh to uh sort

0:29:14.960 --> 0:29:18.800
<v Speaker 1>of create uh boogey men are able to do that. Okay,

0:29:18.840 --> 0:29:21.160
<v Speaker 1>So you graduate from college, you decide you don't want

0:29:21.160 --> 0:29:24.280
<v Speaker 1>to be an academic economists't want to be an economists

0:29:24.280 --> 0:29:26.120
<v Speaker 1>at all. So what do you do? Uh? Well, I

0:29:26.160 --> 0:29:27.920
<v Speaker 1>had had two or three different job choices, and they

0:29:27.920 --> 0:29:30.200
<v Speaker 1>were pretty interesting. I could have stayed with a little

0:29:30.240 --> 0:29:33.920
<v Speaker 1>ivy research company that had made it made those games,

0:29:33.920 --> 0:29:36.240
<v Speaker 1>and we were working on some consulting projects that turned

0:29:36.280 --> 0:29:39.560
<v Speaker 1>into some interesting things. My friends Steve stayed with that,

0:29:40.280 --> 0:29:41.800
<v Speaker 1>but I decided, I do I want to do something

0:29:41.840 --> 0:29:44.240
<v Speaker 1>where I could learn a lot more about scale um

0:29:44.640 --> 0:29:46.239
<v Speaker 1>and so I had a couple of job offers at

0:29:46.240 --> 0:29:48.480
<v Speaker 1>Hewlett Packard, which I thought was I didn't want to

0:29:48.480 --> 0:29:50.680
<v Speaker 1>go to IBM. I thought it was too bureaucratic and

0:29:50.840 --> 0:29:55.200
<v Speaker 1>to organized around like people who's you know, in intensity

0:29:55.280 --> 0:29:58.040
<v Speaker 1>level and in intellect and like, we're more sort of

0:29:58.080 --> 0:30:00.720
<v Speaker 1>within one standard deviation of the norm in a place

0:30:00.720 --> 0:30:02.360
<v Speaker 1>where if you really want to throw yourself into it,

0:30:02.400 --> 0:30:04.520
<v Speaker 1>you could have a huge impact. And IBM is a

0:30:04.520 --> 0:30:06.800
<v Speaker 1>is a great company in a lot of ways, but

0:30:06.840 --> 0:30:08.960
<v Speaker 1>at that point it was it had gotten pretty big

0:30:08.960 --> 0:30:12.800
<v Speaker 1>and bureaucratic um so Hewlett Packard had a couple of

0:30:12.800 --> 0:30:14.960
<v Speaker 1>opportunities there. I thought it was an interesting place. And

0:30:15.000 --> 0:30:18.960
<v Speaker 1>then Uh, Steve Bomber, uh and Paul Allen went to

0:30:19.000 --> 0:30:22.160
<v Speaker 1>Mike went to Yale and and and inteviewed people from Microsoft.

0:30:22.520 --> 0:30:23.880
<v Speaker 1>And I knew a little bit about the I knew

0:30:23.880 --> 0:30:25.640
<v Speaker 1>more about the PC than the average college kid in

0:30:26.920 --> 0:30:29.800
<v Speaker 1>three so interven with them and they, you know a

0:30:29.840 --> 0:30:32.200
<v Speaker 1>little bit slower. Did you know them previously? You know,

0:30:32.240 --> 0:30:34.760
<v Speaker 1>I knew, I knew who Microsoft was, but they just

0:30:35.000 --> 0:30:37.280
<v Speaker 1>they came to campus. One of the things Microsoft did

0:30:37.280 --> 0:30:40.160
<v Speaker 1>well and why it's scaled up, is they did uh

0:30:40.320 --> 0:30:43.040
<v Speaker 1>college recruiting very early in Microsoft cycle. At the time,

0:30:43.080 --> 0:30:47.560
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft was about two fifty people, and they started recruiting

0:30:47.600 --> 0:30:52.400
<v Speaker 1>on at least some college campuses starting in like so

0:30:52.680 --> 0:30:55.760
<v Speaker 1>by that time Microsoft was coming to Yale, and Microsoft

0:30:55.800 --> 0:30:58.920
<v Speaker 1>ended up hiring me in six or seven of my classmates.

0:30:59.360 --> 0:31:01.720
<v Speaker 1>Uh for uh with the class of eight three And

0:31:01.800 --> 0:31:03.800
<v Speaker 1>what do you think? And you moved to Seattle, right?

0:31:03.840 --> 0:31:05.920
<v Speaker 1>I did? Yes? And what was that for someone who

0:31:05.920 --> 0:31:08.560
<v Speaker 1>basically was at East Coast boy, Well, my mom was

0:31:08.600 --> 0:31:12.680
<v Speaker 1>from California and we visited the Barrier bunch. Uh and Uh,

0:31:12.720 --> 0:31:14.280
<v Speaker 1>So I thought, if you'd asked me, I thought, maybe

0:31:14.320 --> 0:31:16.760
<v Speaker 1>I'll end up in California. Uh. And all I knew

0:31:16.760 --> 0:31:18.720
<v Speaker 1>about Seattle was I'd read Ball four when I was

0:31:18.720 --> 0:31:22.080
<v Speaker 1>a kid, which was Jim Bountain's baseball book, primarily about

0:31:22.080 --> 0:31:23.520
<v Speaker 1>the year that he was with the Seattle Pilots in

0:31:23.600 --> 0:31:26.160
<v Speaker 1>nine nine. So I knew that Seattle was a team.

0:31:26.240 --> 0:31:30.040
<v Speaker 1>Was he was a city that hadn't lost a baseball team. Fortunately,

0:31:30.080 --> 0:31:31.440
<v Speaker 1>by the time I got through in a D three,

0:31:31.480 --> 0:31:34.200
<v Speaker 1>they had a new one because the Mariners started in

0:31:34.200 --> 0:31:37.520
<v Speaker 1>seventy seven as part of an antitrust settlement for the

0:31:37.560 --> 0:31:42.120
<v Speaker 1>Pilots moving to Milwaukee. So the the uh the head

0:31:42.120 --> 0:31:44.600
<v Speaker 1>of baseball team. So that was a check. It was

0:31:44.640 --> 0:31:47.120
<v Speaker 1>close to the West Coast. My parents ended up retiring

0:31:47.120 --> 0:31:49.760
<v Speaker 1>to northern California a couple years after we were out there,

0:31:49.800 --> 0:31:51.760
<v Speaker 1>so that was sort of a check. And it was

0:31:51.800 --> 0:31:54.960
<v Speaker 1>honestly that when everybody in a Microsoft was incredibly smart,

0:31:55.000 --> 0:31:58.080
<v Speaker 1>incredibly hardcore, and I thought, well, this is this place.

0:31:58.120 --> 0:31:59.600
<v Speaker 1>Seems like it's got a lot of people that I

0:31:59.640 --> 0:32:01.360
<v Speaker 1>want to work with and I can learn from, and

0:32:01.400 --> 0:32:02.640
<v Speaker 1>I'll do it for a couple of years. Un Look,

0:32:02.680 --> 0:32:05.479
<v Speaker 1>it's boring and ended up being ten years. Okay. When

0:32:05.560 --> 0:32:07.360
<v Speaker 1>you went to work there, it wasn't public yet, No,

0:32:07.520 --> 0:32:09.480
<v Speaker 1>it was. I was getting lucky but better than good.

0:32:09.640 --> 0:32:12.120
<v Speaker 1>So I got there in eighty three. Uh, and Microsoft

0:32:12.160 --> 0:32:15.800
<v Speaker 1>went public in eighty six. Okay, And what was your

0:32:15.840 --> 0:32:18.800
<v Speaker 1>gig at Microsoft? Well, I worked in basically three parts

0:32:18.840 --> 0:32:21.280
<v Speaker 1>of the company. Was always met banking products because that's

0:32:21.320 --> 0:32:24.160
<v Speaker 1>my passion. The first four years I worked in the

0:32:24.240 --> 0:32:28.400
<v Speaker 1>applications products. Uh, I was involved with the I didn't

0:32:28.400 --> 0:32:31.000
<v Speaker 1>create Microsoft Word, but when I got involved with word,

0:32:31.040 --> 0:32:33.800
<v Speaker 1>word was like number five and word processing and got

0:32:33.840 --> 0:32:35.640
<v Speaker 1>it up to number two at the time, right behind

0:32:35.640 --> 0:32:38.640
<v Speaker 1>Word Perfect, and we're kind of getting getting strong with them.

0:32:38.640 --> 0:32:40.840
<v Speaker 1>And then I ran what it's called program management for

0:32:40.840 --> 0:32:43.920
<v Speaker 1>all the applications products, which is like the connective tissue

0:32:43.960 --> 0:32:47.240
<v Speaker 1>between the marketers on the one hand and the engineers

0:32:47.280 --> 0:32:48.840
<v Speaker 1>and the other. And since I had sort of a

0:32:48.920 --> 0:32:51.840
<v Speaker 1>dual background, I was able to kind of play hopefully

0:32:52.000 --> 0:32:54.720
<v Speaker 1>a contructive role in spanning the two. So that was

0:32:54.760 --> 0:32:57.880
<v Speaker 1>my first four years, and then my next to three

0:32:57.960 --> 0:33:00.680
<v Speaker 1>years was working on networking products because I was always

0:33:00.680 --> 0:33:03.960
<v Speaker 1>interested in communication, right, so networking is about understanding the

0:33:03.960 --> 0:33:06.840
<v Speaker 1>plumbing and the infrastructure. So that was the least successful

0:33:06.880 --> 0:33:09.480
<v Speaker 1>thing I worked on because at the time Microsoft was

0:33:09.520 --> 0:33:12.840
<v Speaker 1>betting heavily on an operating system called OS two and

0:33:13.040 --> 0:33:16.400
<v Speaker 1>which was a joint venture of form between Microsoft and IBM,

0:33:16.440 --> 0:33:19.520
<v Speaker 1>and Microsoft decided to build all its networking products on

0:33:19.560 --> 0:33:23.000
<v Speaker 1>the OS two platform. UM and UH. So I did

0:33:23.000 --> 0:33:24.560
<v Speaker 1>it for a couple of years, worked with some great people.

0:33:24.600 --> 0:33:26.680
<v Speaker 1>It was a fantastic lesson to me of how when

0:33:26.680 --> 0:33:30.400
<v Speaker 1>you have a great team, great products, and a bad strategy,

0:33:30.480 --> 0:33:33.280
<v Speaker 1>you fail right. So UM a lot of the people

0:33:33.320 --> 0:33:36.560
<v Speaker 1>I work with ended up in different capacities, having senior

0:33:36.640 --> 0:33:38.440
<v Speaker 1>jobs in Microsoft for a number of years and doing

0:33:38.480 --> 0:33:40.760
<v Speaker 1>cool things in the industry. But our products weren't that

0:33:40.800 --> 0:33:45.040
<v Speaker 1>successful where the generally were failures because OS two was

0:33:45.080 --> 0:33:49.040
<v Speaker 1>not a viable platform to build UH networking servers on.

0:33:49.080 --> 0:33:52.040
<v Speaker 1>Top of Microsoft ended up being very successful in networking

0:33:52.240 --> 0:33:54.520
<v Speaker 1>when it moved from OS to to an operating system

0:33:54.520 --> 0:33:57.640
<v Speaker 1>called Windows NT, which was the next generation. But but

0:33:57.760 --> 0:34:00.160
<v Speaker 1>that was after I left that group, so did for

0:34:00.200 --> 0:34:02.240
<v Speaker 1>a couple of years, and then I worked in something

0:34:02.320 --> 0:34:05.120
<v Speaker 1>we called Multimedia and Consumer Systems, which is the last

0:34:05.440 --> 0:34:07.920
<v Speaker 1>three or four years there, which was basically about figuring

0:34:07.960 --> 0:34:11.359
<v Speaker 1>out how to add media technology into Windows and then

0:34:11.360 --> 0:34:14.000
<v Speaker 1>starting working on the next sort of advanced digital to

0:34:14.120 --> 0:34:16.759
<v Speaker 1>some of the early sort of proto digital devices. So

0:34:16.840 --> 0:34:18.680
<v Speaker 1>that was my last three or four years there, and

0:34:18.920 --> 0:34:21.799
<v Speaker 1>I ended up it was a fantastic tenure run. I

0:34:21.880 --> 0:34:25.040
<v Speaker 1>learned a ton uh and made made some lifelong friends

0:34:25.200 --> 0:34:29.080
<v Speaker 1>and uh couldn't and financially it was obviously a very

0:34:29.120 --> 0:34:33.000
<v Speaker 1>advantageous time to be there. So financially, you know, if

0:34:33.040 --> 0:34:35.960
<v Speaker 1>you read the literature, you did very well. It was

0:34:36.000 --> 0:34:39.279
<v Speaker 1>that primarily getting in early or your success in the

0:34:39.320 --> 0:34:43.520
<v Speaker 1>operation or well, yeah, I mean it was the right place,

0:34:43.640 --> 0:34:45.560
<v Speaker 1>right time. And then I did work my butt off

0:34:45.680 --> 0:34:48.640
<v Speaker 1>and worked very closely with you know, Gates and Bomber

0:34:48.680 --> 0:34:51.040
<v Speaker 1>and these other guys and uh, and they I think

0:34:51.040 --> 0:34:54.839
<v Speaker 1>they viewed me as somebody who was hardcore like you know,

0:34:55.200 --> 0:34:57.319
<v Speaker 1>I would work six seven days a week without not like,

0:34:57.360 --> 0:34:59.120
<v Speaker 1>without worrying about it because I I loved what I

0:34:59.160 --> 0:35:01.000
<v Speaker 1>was doing. It was was like it was I didn't

0:35:01.040 --> 0:35:03.799
<v Speaker 1>have any family or kids at the time. So classic thing.

0:35:03.800 --> 0:35:05.480
<v Speaker 1>You know, you're in your twenty you throw yourself into

0:35:05.480 --> 0:35:07.480
<v Speaker 1>your career and had a great time with it. So

0:35:07.560 --> 0:35:09.839
<v Speaker 1>it worked out. It worked out very well to me.

0:35:10.040 --> 0:35:12.000
<v Speaker 1>And uh, you know, at the end of the ten years,

0:35:12.040 --> 0:35:14.000
<v Speaker 1>when I looked up and you know, said, wow, this

0:35:14.040 --> 0:35:16.279
<v Speaker 1>has been a decade and pull up my pull my

0:35:16.320 --> 0:35:19.040
<v Speaker 1>pariscope up, I was ready to do something else. But

0:35:19.080 --> 0:35:22.040
<v Speaker 1>I was incredibly happy for the experience. I okay, So

0:35:22.480 --> 0:35:26.120
<v Speaker 1>what came first in terms of leaving this the concept

0:35:26.200 --> 0:35:29.000
<v Speaker 1>that you were done and you've fulfilled your mission at Microsoft,

0:35:29.200 --> 0:35:31.160
<v Speaker 1>or that you wanted to do real networks. Well, I

0:35:31.200 --> 0:35:33.120
<v Speaker 1>didn't have the idea for real network So I remember

0:35:33.160 --> 0:35:37.320
<v Speaker 1>in the spring of nineties three, so I'm what thirty one, uh,

0:35:37.360 --> 0:35:39.960
<v Speaker 1>and uh Gates comes to me and says, I want

0:35:40.000 --> 0:35:42.600
<v Speaker 1>to reorganize some things, and I say, great, let's re

0:35:42.719 --> 0:35:45.200
<v Speaker 1>organize me out of a job. Um, which I don't

0:35:45.200 --> 0:35:48.440
<v Speaker 1>think what he expected because but it was really was

0:35:48.520 --> 0:35:50.440
<v Speaker 1>how I was feeling I was. I'd been working so

0:35:50.520 --> 0:35:53.239
<v Speaker 1>hard loving it, but I knew that I wouldn't really

0:35:53.280 --> 0:35:55.359
<v Speaker 1>be able to step back and think about the next

0:35:55.360 --> 0:35:57.360
<v Speaker 1>thing until I had some breathing room. I had to

0:35:57.680 --> 0:36:00.239
<v Speaker 1>create some separation. Just go back when you have sets

0:36:00.239 --> 0:36:02.239
<v Speaker 1>off the way you tell the story, you really were

0:36:02.239 --> 0:36:05.120
<v Speaker 1>not a programmer. No. I wrote a very little code

0:36:05.120 --> 0:36:07.520
<v Speaker 1>that ended up in Microsoft products. I was a technical

0:36:07.680 --> 0:36:11.319
<v Speaker 1>enough person to help to work with the engineers UH,

0:36:11.360 --> 0:36:14.280
<v Speaker 1>and a marketing business or in enough person to understand

0:36:14.360 --> 0:36:17.080
<v Speaker 1>to go talk to customers, try to understand what the

0:36:17.120 --> 0:36:19.960
<v Speaker 1>market wanted. And I was thought of myself as adding

0:36:20.040 --> 0:36:23.239
<v Speaker 1>value at that intersection between those two. Okay, so you

0:36:23.280 --> 0:36:26.360
<v Speaker 1>wanted some breathing room, so you said, Bill, let's reorganize

0:36:26.360 --> 0:36:28.520
<v Speaker 1>me out of a job. Right? And how did that

0:36:28.560 --> 0:36:32.480
<v Speaker 1>go down? So we had three meetings on the topic. UM.

0:36:32.600 --> 0:36:35.640
<v Speaker 1>The first meeting, he yelled at me, this is the

0:36:35.719 --> 0:36:39.080
<v Speaker 1>most irrational thing, This is the stupidest thing. Why you're

0:36:39.080 --> 0:36:40.520
<v Speaker 1>doing this, Why do you want to do this? Go

0:36:40.600 --> 0:36:42.160
<v Speaker 1>talk to this guy and go to talk to that guy.

0:36:42.320 --> 0:36:46.560
<v Speaker 1>So fine, I did. That second meeting was basically the same. UH.

0:36:46.680 --> 0:36:48.839
<v Speaker 1>Then the third meeting happened in about five minutes into

0:36:48.880 --> 0:36:51.239
<v Speaker 1>the third meeting two star, I looked at him and

0:36:51.280 --> 0:36:54.120
<v Speaker 1>I said, is this making you feel better? And he

0:36:54.160 --> 0:36:55.799
<v Speaker 1>looked at me like I was crazy, because why would

0:36:55.800 --> 0:36:57.560
<v Speaker 1>I say that? And I said, because it is making

0:36:57.560 --> 0:36:59.520
<v Speaker 1>you feel better, you should keep doing it, but it's

0:36:59.520 --> 0:37:02.720
<v Speaker 1>not making me feel better and it's not changing my mind. Um,

0:37:02.719 --> 0:37:05.280
<v Speaker 1>And to his credit, he stopped cold, and we proceeded

0:37:05.320 --> 0:37:09.440
<v Speaker 1>to have a very rational conversation about you know, uh,

0:37:09.760 --> 0:37:12.319
<v Speaker 1>how we make a good transition, how what we do.

0:37:12.640 --> 0:37:14.680
<v Speaker 1>I ended up technically doing a leave of absence, so

0:37:14.719 --> 0:37:17.120
<v Speaker 1>I spent six months traveling around the world and do

0:37:17.200 --> 0:37:19.160
<v Speaker 1>another taking up. Actually I took a class down and

0:37:19.160 --> 0:37:21.759
<v Speaker 1>maybe I go to PhD, which I decided not to do.

0:37:22.280 --> 0:37:25.080
<v Speaker 1>Uh and uh. Then I did some consulting from Microsoft

0:37:25.280 --> 0:37:27.839
<v Speaker 1>on a few topics that are related to the one

0:37:27.920 --> 0:37:31.080
<v Speaker 1>related to what the intersection of the Internet and Microsoft

0:37:31.120 --> 0:37:34.680
<v Speaker 1>strategy should be. One related to the future. There's this

0:37:34.760 --> 0:37:37.640
<v Speaker 1>joint venture Microsoft was brewing called cable Soft, and I

0:37:37.680 --> 0:37:39.759
<v Speaker 1>consulted with Bill on whether he should do the joint

0:37:39.800 --> 0:37:42.080
<v Speaker 1>venture with the two big cable companies to try to

0:37:42.120 --> 0:37:45.960
<v Speaker 1>create the dominant operating system for cable TV set top boxes.

0:37:46.200 --> 0:37:48.440
<v Speaker 1>So I did a little consulting at the back end

0:37:48.480 --> 0:37:50.600
<v Speaker 1>of that. Uh and at the time I was already

0:37:50.600 --> 0:37:53.480
<v Speaker 1>brewing the idea for what became Real Networks. But it

0:37:53.520 --> 0:37:57.239
<v Speaker 1>was really during that that summer and fall of of

0:37:57.520 --> 0:38:01.799
<v Speaker 1>two thousands of other uh three, that I was figuring

0:38:01.840 --> 0:38:03.759
<v Speaker 1>out what I was gonna do next. And when you

0:38:03.840 --> 0:38:06.560
<v Speaker 1>left Microsoft, did you have enough money to never work again?

0:38:07.480 --> 0:38:11.080
<v Speaker 1>You know? If I was a monk? Sure, okay, I

0:38:11.120 --> 0:38:14.200
<v Speaker 1>got my answer. But but I figured, like I was

0:38:14.239 --> 0:38:18.920
<v Speaker 1>thirty one, uh, I think I Uh, I knew I

0:38:18.920 --> 0:38:20.880
<v Speaker 1>had a lot of ambitions and things I was interested

0:38:20.880 --> 0:38:22.719
<v Speaker 1>in doing, and ended up putting a bunch of the

0:38:22.719 --> 0:38:25.359
<v Speaker 1>money into the company that became Real Network. So uh

0:38:25.400 --> 0:38:26.960
<v Speaker 1>it worked out just fine. So how did you come

0:38:27.000 --> 0:38:29.279
<v Speaker 1>up with the idea for Real Networks? Well? I had

0:38:29.320 --> 0:38:32.120
<v Speaker 1>two ideas, actually, uh in the summer of ninety three.

0:38:32.800 --> 0:38:35.560
<v Speaker 1>One was focused on this notion of set top boxes

0:38:35.600 --> 0:38:38.760
<v Speaker 1>and cable and television as his starians and this stuff.

0:38:38.880 --> 0:38:41.239
<v Speaker 1>Remember all the cable companies were talking about the five

0:38:41.239 --> 0:38:43.879
<v Speaker 1>inter channel universe that time. Warner had their big trial

0:38:43.880 --> 0:38:46.760
<v Speaker 1>in Orlando, Florida. They were reinventing, They're going to reinvent

0:38:46.840 --> 0:38:51.080
<v Speaker 1>television uh, t c I, the other big cable company

0:38:51.200 --> 0:38:53.399
<v Speaker 1>had their own tiles, and telcos had them. So we're

0:38:53.440 --> 0:38:55.319
<v Speaker 1>like tele A TV, which was the thing that Howard

0:38:55.320 --> 0:38:57.759
<v Speaker 1>Stringer was involved in. They're on these different trials. So

0:38:57.800 --> 0:39:00.680
<v Speaker 1>I thought, when maybe I'll make technology gene products for

0:39:00.719 --> 0:39:04.319
<v Speaker 1>those And then at the same time, I thought, well,

0:39:04.360 --> 0:39:07.520
<v Speaker 1>maybe there's something to this online communications world. I've been

0:39:07.520 --> 0:39:09.520
<v Speaker 1>an online geek. One of the products that created a

0:39:09.560 --> 0:39:13.680
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft was an online product called Microsoft Access, before the database,

0:39:13.719 --> 0:39:16.720
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft Access, the first Micronofic Action was a communications product

0:39:16.800 --> 0:39:19.640
<v Speaker 1>that was not that successful, but I'd work closely with

0:39:20.000 --> 0:39:23.239
<v Speaker 1>trying to trying to create a consistent user interface behind

0:39:23.239 --> 0:39:25.600
<v Speaker 1>CompuServe and a o L and the products and all

0:39:25.640 --> 0:39:28.160
<v Speaker 1>these services. So I was very smilar with the online world.

0:39:28.680 --> 0:39:31.279
<v Speaker 1>And I got lucky again. A good friend of mine

0:39:31.360 --> 0:39:33.480
<v Speaker 1>named Mitch kap Poor asked me to get involved in

0:39:33.520 --> 0:39:36.719
<v Speaker 1>a nonprofit he started, Well, that was Lotus one, two three, right.

0:39:36.800 --> 0:39:39.840
<v Speaker 1>I got to know Mitch through various interact with Microsoft.

0:39:40.080 --> 0:39:42.719
<v Speaker 1>Mitch was somebody and is somebody who cares about the

0:39:42.760 --> 0:39:46.480
<v Speaker 1>intersection between technology and society. And Mitch is one of

0:39:46.480 --> 0:39:49.840
<v Speaker 1>these people who's always understand stuff. Five years before anybody

0:39:49.840 --> 0:39:54.360
<v Speaker 1>else does both, both strategically and really more almost like, uh,

0:39:54.400 --> 0:39:57.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, conceptually. And Mitch was convinced that the Internet

0:39:57.760 --> 0:40:00.279
<v Speaker 1>was going to be a huge deal cyberspace was most

0:40:00.320 --> 0:40:02.800
<v Speaker 1>people called it at the time, and he created this

0:40:02.880 --> 0:40:05.960
<v Speaker 1>organization called the Electronic Frontier Foundation that was very focused

0:40:06.000 --> 0:40:09.319
<v Speaker 1>on issues of civil liberty and community in cyberspace. So

0:40:09.440 --> 0:40:12.279
<v Speaker 1>Mitch asked me, and the time that I was I

0:40:12.280 --> 0:40:14.120
<v Speaker 1>was technically to leave, but I was I wasn't gonna

0:40:14.120 --> 0:40:16.719
<v Speaker 1>go back to Microsoft. So in this late spring early

0:40:16.719 --> 0:40:19.000
<v Speaker 1>summer of nine three, he said, come to a board

0:40:19.040 --> 0:40:21.839
<v Speaker 1>meeting of the Electronic Frontier Foundation, And so I went

0:40:21.880 --> 0:40:23.880
<v Speaker 1>to one of the board meetings in Austin, Texas, I

0:40:23.920 --> 0:40:26.520
<v Speaker 1>think it was, and I met and one of the

0:40:26.520 --> 0:40:28.759
<v Speaker 1>guys there was this guy named Dave Farber, who really

0:40:28.840 --> 0:40:31.319
<v Speaker 1>was one of the fathers in the Internet, was telling everyone, Hey,

0:40:31.360 --> 0:40:33.799
<v Speaker 1>you gotta try this Mosaic thing. So that's when I

0:40:33.800 --> 0:40:36.600
<v Speaker 1>first saw the Mosaic web browser in a very early

0:40:36.680 --> 0:40:40.080
<v Speaker 1>form that Mark Andresen and his band of of geeks

0:40:40.120 --> 0:40:43.640
<v Speaker 1>at University of Illinois Champagne ORBANDA were creating. So I

0:40:43.680 --> 0:40:47.480
<v Speaker 1>downloaded Mosaic, I got an I S D n dial

0:40:47.520 --> 0:40:50.520
<v Speaker 1>in line to my home in Seattle. UH, And I

0:40:50.560 --> 0:40:52.440
<v Speaker 1>just all of a sudden saw, wow, this is the future.

0:40:52.880 --> 0:40:54.600
<v Speaker 1>Because you would look at the web, you look at

0:40:54.640 --> 0:40:56.760
<v Speaker 1>the web browser, and they they had a web page

0:40:56.800 --> 0:41:00.000
<v Speaker 1>called What's New with NCSA mosaic And at first there

0:41:00.080 --> 0:41:02.880
<v Speaker 1>be like one or two new web pages a week.

0:41:03.480 --> 0:41:05.759
<v Speaker 1>Then there'd be like six new ones a week. Then

0:41:05.800 --> 0:41:08.279
<v Speaker 1>there'd be like three a day. And it literally felt

0:41:08.320 --> 0:41:10.680
<v Speaker 1>like I was looking at a Petrie dish where the

0:41:11.520 --> 0:41:14.920
<v Speaker 1>sales were multiplying rapidly. And it was clear that as

0:41:14.960 --> 0:41:18.120
<v Speaker 1>the summer of ninety three progressed and got into the

0:41:18.120 --> 0:41:19.960
<v Speaker 1>fall of ninety three, that there was a huge thing

0:41:20.040 --> 0:41:26.000
<v Speaker 1>happening UH that was going to be like a a

0:41:26.040 --> 0:41:29.960
<v Speaker 1>huge cultural phenomenon. And I had been very interested in media,

0:41:30.040 --> 0:41:32.440
<v Speaker 1>of course, and had done a bunch of staff rounding

0:41:32.520 --> 0:41:37.520
<v Speaker 1>around video and audio Codex in my world and Multimedia Microsoft.

0:41:37.840 --> 0:41:39.400
<v Speaker 1>So I had the idea, what if I tried to

0:41:39.480 --> 0:41:43.040
<v Speaker 1>do what Mosaic is doing for text and still graphics,

0:41:43.239 --> 0:41:44.560
<v Speaker 1>what if we tried to do the same thing for

0:41:44.600 --> 0:41:47.400
<v Speaker 1>audio and then video? Uh? And that's why what the

0:41:47.440 --> 0:41:50.440
<v Speaker 1>idea for real networks ended up being, and ended up

0:41:50.480 --> 0:41:54.080
<v Speaker 1>incorporating in February nine and creating the first prototype in

0:41:54.120 --> 0:41:58.560
<v Speaker 1>the summer of ninety four UH, and then launching in April. Okay,

0:41:58.680 --> 0:42:02.600
<v Speaker 1>and did you raise money of Real Networks? Yes? What

0:42:02.719 --> 0:42:05.280
<v Speaker 1>I did was when I started, I took a million

0:42:05.280 --> 0:42:08.040
<v Speaker 1>dollars of my Microsoft crop steak, which was a high

0:42:08.040 --> 0:42:10.319
<v Speaker 1>percentage of it, but not a you know, I wasn't

0:42:10.320 --> 0:42:12.040
<v Speaker 1>I didn't have to sell any houses or anything, or

0:42:12.280 --> 0:42:14.920
<v Speaker 1>my one house. But I took a million dollars, put

0:42:14.960 --> 0:42:17.200
<v Speaker 1>it into the company and told the four of the

0:42:17.320 --> 0:42:19.759
<v Speaker 1>people I hired, we've got this much money to get

0:42:19.800 --> 0:42:21.279
<v Speaker 1>to the next phase. So I was very lucky that

0:42:21.320 --> 0:42:23.359
<v Speaker 1>I didn't have to go raise money. Then my friend

0:42:23.440 --> 0:42:25.839
<v Speaker 1>Mitch kape Poor got excited about what I was doing,

0:42:26.480 --> 0:42:30.280
<v Speaker 1>and in the fall of ninety four window of ninety

0:42:30.920 --> 0:42:33.640
<v Speaker 1>Mitch made about a two million dollar investment into Real

0:42:33.680 --> 0:42:37.120
<v Speaker 1>Networks UM. And then we launched in UH in April nine.

0:42:37.960 --> 0:42:41.440
<v Speaker 1>So I was able to bootstrap it with some of

0:42:41.480 --> 0:42:44.960
<v Speaker 1>my grub steak from Microsoft. Mitch, because you know, Mitch

0:42:45.000 --> 0:42:46.799
<v Speaker 1>and I became close through the involved with you have

0:42:46.800 --> 0:42:49.720
<v Speaker 1>have Mitch made the original Angeal investment. Then we launched.

0:42:49.760 --> 0:42:52.799
<v Speaker 1>Then we took our first venture round in the fall

0:42:52.840 --> 0:42:55.120
<v Speaker 1>of ninety five from a great firm called Excel and

0:42:55.160 --> 0:42:58.040
<v Speaker 1>a guy named Jim Bryer who's uh, you know, maybe

0:42:58.040 --> 0:43:00.600
<v Speaker 1>on the second most famous investment, but invested years later

0:43:00.640 --> 0:43:02.279
<v Speaker 1>in this thing called Facebook. That worked out pretty well

0:43:02.280 --> 0:43:04.719
<v Speaker 1>for him to Okay, when you're starting real network, so

0:43:04.800 --> 0:43:08.120
<v Speaker 1>many people are working there. So when we started, obviously

0:43:08.160 --> 0:43:11.359
<v Speaker 1>it was just me UM, and then I cobbled together

0:43:11.400 --> 0:43:14.640
<v Speaker 1>a team of three guys, only one of whom became

0:43:14.680 --> 0:43:17.719
<v Speaker 1>a full time employee UH to help build a prototype

0:43:17.760 --> 0:43:21.160
<v Speaker 1>for real report became Real Audio UM, and then by

0:43:21.200 --> 0:43:25.279
<v Speaker 1>the time we launched UH in April of ninety we

0:43:25.400 --> 0:43:29.040
<v Speaker 1>probably had fifteen employees something like that. UM. One of

0:43:29.080 --> 0:43:31.200
<v Speaker 1>the key guys I got was an named Phil Barrett,

0:43:31.440 --> 0:43:34.760
<v Speaker 1>who was a key engineer and injuring leader in Windows

0:43:35.239 --> 0:43:37.440
<v Speaker 1>UH and was one of the unsung heroes of the

0:43:37.480 --> 0:43:40.719
<v Speaker 1>success of Windows UH. Windows. If people know the history,

0:43:40.719 --> 0:43:43.480
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft had a very long gestation period and it was

0:43:43.520 --> 0:43:46.640
<v Speaker 1>basically a near failure, and Phil got involved in creating

0:43:46.640 --> 0:43:49.680
<v Speaker 1>the first useful version of Windows called Windows three D six,

0:43:49.920 --> 0:43:52.440
<v Speaker 1>which allows you to run multiple doss apps on a

0:43:52.480 --> 0:43:54.920
<v Speaker 1>three D six until three D six chip computer and

0:43:54.960 --> 0:43:57.120
<v Speaker 1>it was really useful. And then he and a couple

0:43:57.160 --> 0:43:59.959
<v Speaker 1>of his guys created a version of Windows that saw

0:44:00.000 --> 0:44:03.640
<v Speaker 1>of the memory problem that Windows has. Windows was really

0:44:03.719 --> 0:44:06.680
<v Speaker 1>bad with using memory because the PC had a the

0:44:06.719 --> 0:44:08.719
<v Speaker 1>Intel chip had a kind of a funny segmented memory

0:44:08.800 --> 0:44:11.200
<v Speaker 1>architecture that made it hard. And they fixed that and

0:44:11.239 --> 0:44:13.480
<v Speaker 1>they created a core of what became Windows three. So

0:44:13.600 --> 0:44:16.560
<v Speaker 1>Phil was the the unsung hero behind that, and I

0:44:16.600 --> 0:44:19.240
<v Speaker 1>got him to come in not technically as my co founder,

0:44:19.480 --> 0:44:22.000
<v Speaker 1>but as the technical leader of the company in the

0:44:22.080 --> 0:44:25.200
<v Speaker 1>fall of ninety four. And then he Phil led the

0:44:25.239 --> 0:44:27.399
<v Speaker 1>team that launched Real Audio, and so I said about

0:44:27.440 --> 0:44:33.480
<v Speaker 1>a fifteen people when we launched. You're listening to my

0:44:33.520 --> 0:44:37.479
<v Speaker 1>conversation with CEO of Real Networks, Rob Glazer, recorded live

0:44:37.560 --> 0:44:41.880
<v Speaker 1>at the Music Media Summit in Santa Barbara, California. I

0:44:41.880 --> 0:44:44.319
<v Speaker 1>hope you're enjoying listening to this episode of The Bob

0:44:44.440 --> 0:44:47.040
<v Speaker 1>Left That's podcast. If you want to listen to sound

0:44:47.080 --> 0:44:49.880
<v Speaker 1>bites from the interviews and see some of my guests,

0:44:50.160 --> 0:44:54.000
<v Speaker 1>check it out and at tune in or Twitter, Facebook,

0:44:54.080 --> 0:44:57.800
<v Speaker 1>and Instagram. Now more of my chat with the CEO

0:44:57.840 --> 0:45:01.839
<v Speaker 1>of Real Networks, Rob Glazer on The Bob Left sets podcast.

0:45:03.360 --> 0:45:06.160
<v Speaker 1>So if you go to the late nineties, real Player

0:45:06.320 --> 0:45:09.480
<v Speaker 1>is the standard. But if one were to pull back

0:45:09.680 --> 0:45:12.040
<v Speaker 1>and look at the war, one would say, you may

0:45:12.120 --> 0:45:14.120
<v Speaker 1>or may not agree. That's what I'm asking you, that

0:45:14.239 --> 0:45:17.359
<v Speaker 1>Real Player ultimately lost the war other than China, which

0:45:17.400 --> 0:45:20.840
<v Speaker 1>we'll talk about in a minute. True, what did you

0:45:20.960 --> 0:45:24.799
<v Speaker 1>learn there? Uh? Well, we had a great run, and

0:45:24.840 --> 0:45:28.080
<v Speaker 1>of course I'm back running the company now, so we're

0:45:28.239 --> 0:45:30.120
<v Speaker 1>we've lived to fight another day, and I think we

0:45:30.120 --> 0:45:32.200
<v Speaker 1>have another renaissance coming up, which we can talk about.

0:45:32.239 --> 0:45:34.080
<v Speaker 1>But one of the things I learned is that when

0:45:34.120 --> 0:45:40.000
<v Speaker 1>you have a huge competitor that threatened is threatened by you. Um.

0:45:40.160 --> 0:45:42.960
<v Speaker 1>You can try to do anything you can to avoid

0:45:42.960 --> 0:45:45.080
<v Speaker 1>a head on fight with that competitor, but the end

0:45:45.120 --> 0:45:46.799
<v Speaker 1>of the day, you just gotta assume it's coming, and

0:45:46.840 --> 0:45:49.839
<v Speaker 1>you've got to scale up massively to do that. So

0:45:50.200 --> 0:45:52.239
<v Speaker 1>what happened is the following. So we got out there

0:45:52.520 --> 0:45:55.120
<v Speaker 1>with real Audio in ninety five or video, and ninety

0:45:55.160 --> 0:45:59.239
<v Speaker 1>seven became the de facto market standard, uh for you know,

0:45:59.320 --> 0:46:03.480
<v Speaker 1>for a number different use cases of streaming audio streaming video.

0:46:03.719 --> 0:46:05.680
<v Speaker 1>We can talk about the music connection. Later we started

0:46:05.719 --> 0:46:09.840
<v Speaker 1>dabbling music, UM and then Microsoft decided that both we

0:46:10.200 --> 0:46:14.040
<v Speaker 1>and we us Netscape and Java or existential threats to Microsoft.

0:46:14.080 --> 0:46:17.520
<v Speaker 1>So they decided to do whatever they could to beat us,

0:46:18.000 --> 0:46:20.680
<v Speaker 1>and UM they had a huge work chest of money

0:46:20.719 --> 0:46:24.560
<v Speaker 1>to do it. UH, they had willingness to use their

0:46:24.560 --> 0:46:27.880
<v Speaker 1>power relationship with PC manufacturers in any way they needed to,

0:46:28.400 --> 0:46:32.480
<v Speaker 1>and so they moved and moved to potentially get PC

0:46:32.600 --> 0:46:37.080
<v Speaker 1>manufacturers to ship their software and not ship our software,

0:46:37.280 --> 0:46:39.960
<v Speaker 1>and to get media companies to use their software and

0:46:40.040 --> 0:46:42.960
<v Speaker 1>not use our software. In the case of the computer manufacturers,

0:46:43.120 --> 0:46:46.239
<v Speaker 1>they basically had a program where let's say the price

0:46:46.239 --> 0:46:49.200
<v Speaker 1>of Windows license vis a hundred dollars UM. And but

0:46:49.239 --> 0:46:51.560
<v Speaker 1>they have a co op program where if you ship

0:46:51.600 --> 0:46:54.480
<v Speaker 1>Windows in the configuration they want, it only costs you sixty.

0:46:55.320 --> 0:46:58.000
<v Speaker 1>So let's say you sell a million PCs, So that's

0:46:58.000 --> 0:47:00.120
<v Speaker 1>a that's a forty million dollar difference in what you

0:47:00.120 --> 0:47:02.360
<v Speaker 1>have to pay a year, and it's forty million dollars

0:47:02.360 --> 0:47:04.719
<v Speaker 1>of pure margin or a low margin business. So all

0:47:04.760 --> 0:47:06.799
<v Speaker 1>you have to do is what Microsoft tells you. So

0:47:06.840 --> 0:47:09.759
<v Speaker 1>that's very powerful. So Microsoft was able to leverage the

0:47:09.760 --> 0:47:13.560
<v Speaker 1>power of their monopoly to squeeze US out UH to

0:47:13.920 --> 0:47:17.080
<v Speaker 1>at the time squeeze the Netscape browser out and and

0:47:17.200 --> 0:47:20.040
<v Speaker 1>uhh force Netscape to basically sell to a o l

0:47:20.480 --> 0:47:24.759
<v Speaker 1>um uh and uh to uh also mess around with

0:47:24.840 --> 0:47:27.400
<v Speaker 1>Java and job and Java script is complicated history, but

0:47:27.760 --> 0:47:32.719
<v Speaker 1>so so we got basically squeezed. And the rational thing

0:47:32.760 --> 0:47:34.560
<v Speaker 1>for us to have done at the time, if what

0:47:34.680 --> 0:47:36.600
<v Speaker 1>we wanted to do was take our chips and go home,

0:47:37.000 --> 0:47:40.120
<v Speaker 1>was to sell to the highest bidder uh make it

0:47:40.200 --> 0:47:43.560
<v Speaker 1>their problem or sell to someone at such larger scale

0:47:43.840 --> 0:47:47.000
<v Speaker 1>that they could fight the fight on with with us

0:47:47.040 --> 0:47:49.600
<v Speaker 1>as a tool or a piece of it. UM. But

0:47:49.680 --> 0:47:52.080
<v Speaker 1>I kind of. I mean's a few things reason why

0:47:52.080 --> 0:47:53.840
<v Speaker 1>I didn't do that. One is I actually wanted to

0:47:53.880 --> 0:47:55.560
<v Speaker 1>try and build a company for long term. I didn't

0:47:55.600 --> 0:47:58.120
<v Speaker 1>want to just flip it and sell it. Um. The

0:47:58.120 --> 0:48:01.640
<v Speaker 1>second was the UM you know a lot of things

0:48:01.680 --> 0:48:05.239
<v Speaker 1>that happened concur with that. This is now around the

0:48:05.320 --> 0:48:08.240
<v Speaker 1>until the had the the the the the Internet bubble

0:48:08.239 --> 0:48:11.200
<v Speaker 1>bursting at the same time. So you have the telecom

0:48:11.200 --> 0:48:14.040
<v Speaker 1>bubble burst and the Internet bubble bursting, and this assault

0:48:14.040 --> 0:48:18.879
<v Speaker 1>from Microsoft against and a trust uh violations that turned

0:48:18.920 --> 0:48:22.120
<v Speaker 1>out UM and uh and they and those those three

0:48:22.120 --> 0:48:25.120
<v Speaker 1>things had a very negative impact on us. We ultimately

0:48:25.200 --> 0:48:27.799
<v Speaker 1>ended up uh not only surviving, but in a star

0:48:27.800 --> 0:48:31.440
<v Speaker 1>way prevailing. We won. Ah, we started winning some and

0:48:31.560 --> 0:48:34.480
<v Speaker 1>a trust legal cases against Microsoft, and they ended up

0:48:34.480 --> 0:48:37.439
<v Speaker 1>settling with us for about seven and fifty million dollars. Uh.

0:48:37.480 --> 0:48:40.080
<v Speaker 1>So we got a decent outcome from that standpoint. From

0:48:40.080 --> 0:48:43.920
<v Speaker 1>the standpoint of shareholders, um but um, but we ended

0:48:44.000 --> 0:48:46.640
<v Speaker 1>up also pivoting the company and reinventing the company in

0:48:46.680 --> 0:48:48.560
<v Speaker 1>a few different ways. But you know, if I had

0:48:48.560 --> 0:48:51.480
<v Speaker 1>it to do over again, I would probably have found

0:48:51.920 --> 0:48:55.239
<v Speaker 1>the safe given that we didn't have the resources ourselves

0:48:55.680 --> 0:48:58.799
<v Speaker 1>to compete head on with that attack. Even though we're

0:48:58.800 --> 0:49:03.120
<v Speaker 1>able to win legal settlement, they basically uh compensated us

0:49:03.160 --> 0:49:04.919
<v Speaker 1>for the lost business, but they didn't replace the lost

0:49:04.960 --> 0:49:07.760
<v Speaker 1>business except in China. More than that in a minute.

0:49:08.520 --> 0:49:12.719
<v Speaker 1>But they um but they If we found the right

0:49:12.760 --> 0:49:15.000
<v Speaker 1>safe port in a storm, that could have been interesting.

0:49:15.120 --> 0:49:16.640
<v Speaker 1>It's not clear who they would have been like in

0:49:16.680 --> 0:49:20.040
<v Speaker 1>two thousand, who would have who would have been the player? Obviously,

0:49:20.080 --> 0:49:21.960
<v Speaker 1>net Escape went to a o L. They got some

0:49:22.000 --> 0:49:24.919
<v Speaker 1>money from a share oulder standpoint, but the browser didn't

0:49:24.960 --> 0:49:27.360
<v Speaker 1>live in a o L, didn't even ultimately end up living.

0:49:27.360 --> 0:49:29.839
<v Speaker 1>And now they get folded into a Verizon. So it's

0:49:29.960 --> 0:49:33.080
<v Speaker 1>it's not obvious the I mean, you know, it depends

0:49:33.120 --> 0:49:34.440
<v Speaker 1>on you're playing the game, but playing the game to

0:49:34.440 --> 0:49:36.719
<v Speaker 1>make the most cash. The thing that Netscape did, or

0:49:36.719 --> 0:49:39.399
<v Speaker 1>that Mark Huban did, where Mark sold his broadcast dot

0:49:39.440 --> 0:49:42.880
<v Speaker 1>com business to Yahoo for four billion dollars and you know,

0:49:42.960 --> 0:49:44.640
<v Speaker 1>took the money and did other stuff with it. You

0:49:44.680 --> 0:49:46.480
<v Speaker 1>could have done that, but I was was trying to

0:49:46.480 --> 0:49:49.319
<v Speaker 1>build something for the longer term. So when did you

0:49:49.360 --> 0:49:53.000
<v Speaker 1>buy the Pro Bowlers Tour? So, okay, that's kind of

0:49:53.000 --> 0:49:55.080
<v Speaker 1>a weird one, but it's true. So my friend Chris

0:49:55.120 --> 0:49:57.960
<v Speaker 1>Peters was a Microsoft buddy of mine who got really

0:49:58.000 --> 0:50:00.759
<v Speaker 1>into bowling. Uh. Chris is a much better bowler than me.

0:50:01.360 --> 0:50:04.759
<v Speaker 1>Uh he He approached me in a third friend of ours,

0:50:04.800 --> 0:50:07.840
<v Speaker 1>Mike Slade, uh more than ten years ago, I have

0:50:07.840 --> 0:50:11.600
<v Speaker 1>to remember how longer it was, probably sixteen seventeen years ago,

0:50:11.880 --> 0:50:15.200
<v Speaker 1>and said, hey, I can buy the p b a

0:50:14.560 --> 0:50:18.160
<v Speaker 1>uh at a bankruptcy or near bankruptcy that's been mismanaged.

0:50:18.360 --> 0:50:20.240
<v Speaker 1>And I was bowling was one of my favorite sports

0:50:20.280 --> 0:50:22.360
<v Speaker 1>as a kid. I was in a bowling league. Um,

0:50:22.400 --> 0:50:24.719
<v Speaker 1>I am a mediocre bowler, but I enjoy it to

0:50:24.719 --> 0:50:26.360
<v Speaker 1>this day. And you have a bully at a bowling

0:50:26.400 --> 0:50:29.600
<v Speaker 1>lane in your house. I I Uh, I used to

0:50:29.600 --> 0:50:32.200
<v Speaker 1>have a bowling lane in my office. Yes, we and

0:50:32.280 --> 0:50:34.560
<v Speaker 1>Real Network's office in where we were for a decade,

0:50:34.560 --> 0:50:36.239
<v Speaker 1>we had a bowling lane. When we moved to the

0:50:36.400 --> 0:50:37.920
<v Speaker 1>to a top floor of a building, we didn't get

0:50:37.960 --> 0:50:39.680
<v Speaker 1>a bowling lane there, but we did have a bowling

0:50:39.719 --> 0:50:41.200
<v Speaker 1>We did a pair of bowling lanes in the in

0:50:41.239 --> 0:50:43.759
<v Speaker 1>the building uh that we had and uh in a

0:50:43.800 --> 0:50:46.360
<v Speaker 1>neighborhood called Belltown in Seattle, and that was fun. So

0:50:46.400 --> 0:50:49.319
<v Speaker 1>I love bowling. Uh, and I thought, okay, let's do

0:50:49.400 --> 0:50:53.080
<v Speaker 1>this and uh Chris ended up bowing out about five

0:50:53.160 --> 0:50:55.239
<v Speaker 1>or six years ago. So now Mike and I are

0:50:55.239 --> 0:50:56.719
<v Speaker 1>the owners of it. We got a really good guy

0:50:56.760 --> 0:50:59.319
<v Speaker 1>named Tom Clark who runs it. Um if anybody wants

0:50:59.320 --> 0:51:01.480
<v Speaker 1>to buy the p b A, I'm willing to sell it.

0:51:01.719 --> 0:51:05.320
<v Speaker 1>But it's it makes a little money. Uh, it's uh,

0:51:05.360 --> 0:51:07.080
<v Speaker 1>it's nice to be a steward or something that you

0:51:07.120 --> 0:51:10.320
<v Speaker 1>care about. The bowlers are all great human beings, uh

0:51:10.440 --> 0:51:13.680
<v Speaker 1>and uh but most of them are great human beings.

0:51:13.800 --> 0:51:16.800
<v Speaker 1>And uh, you know, I'm happy that we're able to

0:51:16.840 --> 0:51:18.680
<v Speaker 1>sustain a sport that is sort of at the center

0:51:18.680 --> 0:51:21.759
<v Speaker 1>of Americana, And is there any hope for bowling or

0:51:21.800 --> 0:51:25.400
<v Speaker 1>is it going to go extinct? Uh? Well, bowling itself

0:51:25.440 --> 0:51:27.600
<v Speaker 1>has never even more popular in terms of like, you know,

0:51:27.719 --> 0:51:31.080
<v Speaker 1>how many people your bowl bowling leagues have had to

0:51:31.080 --> 0:51:34.760
<v Speaker 1>reinvent themselves because there's describe a book called Bowling Alone,

0:51:35.440 --> 0:51:37.800
<v Speaker 1>which he sent me a copy of for sort of

0:51:37.800 --> 0:51:41.200
<v Speaker 1>obvious reasons and talked him once or twice how bowling

0:51:41.320 --> 0:51:44.920
<v Speaker 1>was tied to the industrial period where everyone worked the

0:51:44.960 --> 0:51:47.959
<v Speaker 1>same shift and left the shift and then went bowld

0:51:48.000 --> 0:51:50.080
<v Speaker 1>at night, you know, sort of Lavern and Shirley style,

0:51:50.520 --> 0:51:53.480
<v Speaker 1>And that culture doesn't really exist anymore. We have a

0:51:53.640 --> 0:51:57.440
<v Speaker 1>much more everybody's on their own schedule, much more scattered,

0:51:57.760 --> 0:52:01.239
<v Speaker 1>both in more and more families both both parents work,

0:52:01.600 --> 0:52:04.480
<v Speaker 1>so you have much less rhythm around that. So there

0:52:04.560 --> 0:52:07.200
<v Speaker 1>is a core industry of corp like four million people

0:52:07.200 --> 0:52:09.440
<v Speaker 1>you're bowling bowling leagues, but it's down from whatever ten

0:52:09.480 --> 0:52:11.440
<v Speaker 1>million used to be, But the number of people who

0:52:11.520 --> 0:52:14.680
<v Speaker 1>bowl recreationally is up higher. You just bowling has been reinvented.

0:52:14.800 --> 0:52:18.400
<v Speaker 1>So how you actually connect professional bowling into that world

0:52:18.440 --> 0:52:21.279
<v Speaker 1>where you have a lot of casual bowlers, but you

0:52:21.320 --> 0:52:23.720
<v Speaker 1>don't have as many sort of league bowls who identify

0:52:23.800 --> 0:52:26.239
<v Speaker 1>with bowling as their sport. Sort of an interesting thing

0:52:26.280 --> 0:52:29.359
<v Speaker 1>to do. But what we've managed to, you know, the

0:52:29.400 --> 0:52:31.440
<v Speaker 1>p b A, we've been on, We've had a long

0:52:31.520 --> 0:52:34.120
<v Speaker 1>run on ESPN. We're just moving to uh Fox. I

0:52:34.120 --> 0:52:36.440
<v Speaker 1>think that kind announced. I hope I'm not jumping the

0:52:36.440 --> 0:52:38.520
<v Speaker 1>gun on that one. I don't think I am uh

0:52:38.560 --> 0:52:40.840
<v Speaker 1>and uh and so I think we're gonna have a

0:52:40.880 --> 0:52:43.479
<v Speaker 1>good you know, next next run with the bowling um

0:52:43.520 --> 0:52:46.440
<v Speaker 1>And it's a it's it's a funding. I only get

0:52:46.440 --> 0:52:48.799
<v Speaker 1>to like one or two tournaments a year. I wish

0:52:48.840 --> 0:52:50.360
<v Speaker 1>I get to more of but I have a pretty

0:52:50.360 --> 0:52:53.560
<v Speaker 1>busy day job in between that and family. Okay, so

0:52:54.040 --> 0:52:58.960
<v Speaker 1>you're into two thousand. There's a steria revolution in the

0:52:59.040 --> 0:53:02.719
<v Speaker 1>music business, and abster you have real networks, you ultimately

0:53:02.760 --> 0:53:06.080
<v Speaker 1>decide to go in that business, right, What is your

0:53:06.160 --> 0:53:09.560
<v Speaker 1>thinking there? Well, I believe that the end of the

0:53:09.640 --> 0:53:12.200
<v Speaker 1>day there would be a legal streaming industry. I didn't

0:53:12.239 --> 0:53:14.239
<v Speaker 1>know all the fits and starts in the twist of

0:53:14.239 --> 0:53:17.160
<v Speaker 1>the road, but I had the belief that all this

0:53:17.719 --> 0:53:21.480
<v Speaker 1>illegal uh you know, uh pirate stuff was going to

0:53:21.560 --> 0:53:23.480
<v Speaker 1>be a phase the industry would go through and the

0:53:23.480 --> 0:53:25.680
<v Speaker 1>industry would figure it out. So I started having conversations

0:53:25.680 --> 0:53:27.920
<v Speaker 1>with people the music industry about this as early as

0:53:27.960 --> 0:53:31.600
<v Speaker 1>like ninety five. I remember meeting Charlie Koppelman, who was

0:53:31.640 --> 0:53:34.160
<v Speaker 1>when he was running a M. I remember meeting, you know,

0:53:34.719 --> 0:53:38.839
<v Speaker 1>senior folks UH in UH multiple labels. Nothing really came

0:53:38.880 --> 0:53:42.240
<v Speaker 1>with those discussions. I remember, you know, having a conversation

0:53:42.320 --> 0:53:45.000
<v Speaker 1>with Al Teller, who was running MC at the time,

0:53:45.280 --> 0:53:47.040
<v Speaker 1>and we're in the middle of the conversation and then

0:53:47.440 --> 0:53:50.960
<v Speaker 1>um uh then Edgar Brompan bought m C A and

0:53:51.000 --> 0:53:52.799
<v Speaker 1>it was clear there's gonna be a new sheriff in town.

0:53:53.080 --> 0:53:54.680
<v Speaker 1>So that there's a lot of a lot of that

0:53:54.719 --> 0:53:58.200
<v Speaker 1>happened a few times. So then um what happened was

0:53:59.120 --> 0:54:05.000
<v Speaker 1>UH sony UH and Universal decided to come together to

0:54:05.120 --> 0:54:07.680
<v Speaker 1>create a joint venture that ended up being first was

0:54:07.680 --> 0:54:10.040
<v Speaker 1>called Duet and it'd be called press called press Play,

0:54:10.200 --> 0:54:13.120
<v Speaker 1>and UM we talked to them about using our technology

0:54:13.120 --> 0:54:14.759
<v Speaker 1>and they kind of wanted to build their own, so

0:54:14.800 --> 0:54:17.439
<v Speaker 1>we put together a coalition of the three other UH

0:54:17.640 --> 0:54:20.640
<v Speaker 1>majors at the time, but there was E M I Bertlesman,

0:54:20.719 --> 0:54:24.239
<v Speaker 1>causin Ian BMG hadn't merged yet. UH and Warner and

0:54:24.280 --> 0:54:25.600
<v Speaker 1>we also had a O L in there because it

0:54:25.600 --> 0:54:27.600
<v Speaker 1>was after the all time Warner and we created a

0:54:27.680 --> 0:54:32.080
<v Speaker 1>joint venture called music Net and it was basically it

0:54:32.120 --> 0:54:35.440
<v Speaker 1>was the other three majors and they had the two majors,

0:54:35.480 --> 0:54:38.200
<v Speaker 1>so the two biggest so UH they had about forty

0:54:38.239 --> 0:54:40.440
<v Speaker 1>percent of the content. We had about forty percent. There

0:54:40.480 --> 0:54:43.240
<v Speaker 1>was about there were indies that were licensed to both

0:54:43.680 --> 0:54:46.279
<v Speaker 1>and it was clear that that wasn't gonna work. It

0:54:46.360 --> 0:54:49.040
<v Speaker 1>was just one of the series of tactical maneuvers to

0:54:49.200 --> 0:54:52.840
<v Speaker 1>create UM UH an opening for everything to get licensed

0:54:52.920 --> 0:54:56.319
<v Speaker 1>everybody and UM and so then what happened was there

0:54:56.360 --> 0:54:59.239
<v Speaker 1>was a little company UH that product called Rhapsody. The

0:54:59.400 --> 0:55:01.799
<v Speaker 1>product was called Listen to Coming Listen dot Com. And

0:55:01.880 --> 0:55:04.880
<v Speaker 1>they ended up being like the Checkpoint Charlie of if

0:55:04.880 --> 0:55:07.760
<v Speaker 1>you remember the in the Cold War that exchanged prisoners,

0:55:08.160 --> 0:55:10.640
<v Speaker 1>Checkpoint Charlie and Berlin right the line between East Berlin

0:55:10.680 --> 0:55:13.600
<v Speaker 1>and West Berlin, and Rhapsody was the Checkpoint Charlie. And

0:55:13.600 --> 0:55:16.440
<v Speaker 1>that they were the first company that all five majors

0:55:16.680 --> 0:55:19.000
<v Speaker 1>would license to because they wouldn't they didn't license to

0:55:19.040 --> 0:55:21.239
<v Speaker 1>each other yet because the lawyers were freaked out about that.

0:55:21.600 --> 0:55:25.160
<v Speaker 1>But by creating sort of standard licenses that Rhapsody could have,

0:55:25.239 --> 0:55:29.399
<v Speaker 1>Rhapsody became the first company that had licenses from all

0:55:29.440 --> 0:55:33.719
<v Speaker 1>five majors. At the time we owned of music Net

0:55:33.719 --> 0:55:35.759
<v Speaker 1>and A During fence with the labels and the board

0:55:35.800 --> 0:55:38.160
<v Speaker 1>meetings were the most painful things. They were like the

0:55:38.280 --> 0:55:40.440
<v Speaker 1>u N in terms of like everyone shows up with

0:55:40.480 --> 0:55:42.680
<v Speaker 1>all these lawyers. The lawyers are making sure there's no

0:55:42.760 --> 0:55:47.000
<v Speaker 1>ended trust collusion. Meanwhile nothing gets done. So uh. So

0:55:47.200 --> 0:55:51.280
<v Speaker 1>we had an opportunity to basically to buy Rhapsody because

0:55:51.280 --> 0:55:53.840
<v Speaker 1>they were running out of money. Uh, and we believed

0:55:53.840 --> 0:55:57.400
<v Speaker 1>in the space, so we basically bought Rhapsody and sold

0:55:57.400 --> 0:56:00.840
<v Speaker 1>our stake in music Net. So we sort of switched

0:56:00.880 --> 0:56:05.000
<v Speaker 1>horses until the license got cleared. And then basically at

0:56:05.000 --> 0:56:07.759
<v Speaker 1>the time we bought raps and you had fifty subscribers

0:56:07.840 --> 0:56:11.120
<v Speaker 1>or something, and then we wrote it up as our vehicle.

0:56:11.600 --> 0:56:14.439
<v Speaker 1>Uh and you know it's still going. We actually merged

0:56:14.440 --> 0:56:16.400
<v Speaker 1>with Napster and now we use the name Napster. We

0:56:16.520 --> 0:56:19.960
<v Speaker 1>got you know, to an appallion subscribers whatever it is. Uh.

0:56:20.000 --> 0:56:24.160
<v Speaker 1>We are we're uh we've resized the staff so it generates,

0:56:24.239 --> 0:56:27.360
<v Speaker 1>so it's even a positive. But we're obviously we're not

0:56:27.400 --> 0:56:29.680
<v Speaker 1>Spotify and we're not Apple. So there were so many

0:56:29.760 --> 0:56:32.200
<v Speaker 1>lessons there which we can talk about about why that

0:56:32.280 --> 0:56:34.200
<v Speaker 1>ended up. You know, we still have a business that's

0:56:34.200 --> 0:56:37.680
<v Speaker 1>got you know, uh, it's you know, if you if

0:56:37.719 --> 0:56:40.920
<v Speaker 1>you step back from the you know, from Spotify and

0:56:41.000 --> 0:56:44.960
<v Speaker 1>obviously Apple were the largest, uh independent company in the space,

0:56:45.320 --> 0:56:48.600
<v Speaker 1>but you know, a huge order of magnitude lower than

0:56:48.880 --> 0:56:51.160
<v Speaker 1>than the two big guys, and you know where that

0:56:51.160 --> 0:56:53.840
<v Speaker 1>goes is an interesting question. But learned a lot of

0:56:53.840 --> 0:56:56.440
<v Speaker 1>things along the way. So isn't the real business being

0:56:56.440 --> 0:57:00.759
<v Speaker 1>a white labeled service now licensing your technology the third party? Uh?

0:57:00.840 --> 0:57:03.040
<v Speaker 1>So the Naster business is a combination of white label

0:57:03.080 --> 0:57:05.920
<v Speaker 1>and co branded. It depends what partners want. So like

0:57:05.960 --> 0:57:08.120
<v Speaker 1>for instance, the case of I Heart Radio, I heard

0:57:08.200 --> 0:57:10.600
<v Speaker 1>music and we power there on demand. I Heart wants

0:57:10.600 --> 0:57:13.120
<v Speaker 1>to be the brand and it says powered by Napster,

0:57:13.440 --> 0:57:16.120
<v Speaker 1>but you don't necessarie it prominently. Some our other partners

0:57:16.200 --> 0:57:19.000
<v Speaker 1>use an Abster brand more prominently like and uh and

0:57:19.040 --> 0:57:21.560
<v Speaker 1>so it just depends. Like in Brazil, uh, we have

0:57:22.240 --> 0:57:25.760
<v Speaker 1>Vivo Music. Uh, it was the largest whereless carrying Brazil,

0:57:25.840 --> 0:57:28.680
<v Speaker 1>powered by Napster. Uh So we use different brands and

0:57:28.720 --> 0:57:31.360
<v Speaker 1>different parts of the world. We have a director consumer business,

0:57:31.360 --> 0:57:33.600
<v Speaker 1>but it's it's not it's the minority of the business.

0:57:33.680 --> 0:57:37.439
<v Speaker 1>It's no longer the main business. So you ultimately walk

0:57:37.520 --> 0:57:40.520
<v Speaker 1>away from real networks to become a VC. What's the

0:57:40.560 --> 0:57:44.000
<v Speaker 1>thinking there, Well, well, these things always, these life changes

0:57:44.000 --> 0:57:47.800
<v Speaker 1>always happen through accombination of personal reasons and professional reasons.

0:57:48.440 --> 0:57:52.640
<v Speaker 1>I have three fantastic kids, twins who are almost twelve,

0:57:53.000 --> 0:57:55.520
<v Speaker 1>and the little guy called little Guy is almost eight.

0:57:55.840 --> 0:57:59.480
<v Speaker 1>Um Um, I've said this publicly, so I'm not speaking

0:57:59.480 --> 0:58:02.360
<v Speaker 1>at the school. In their mom Oh I'm still get

0:58:02.360 --> 0:58:05.360
<v Speaker 1>along with very well, had really bad postpart and depression. Um.

0:58:05.400 --> 0:58:07.720
<v Speaker 1>Like you know, she wanted kids every but as much

0:58:07.760 --> 0:58:10.160
<v Speaker 1>as I did, and she is a fantastic mom, but

0:58:10.200 --> 0:58:12.760
<v Speaker 1>she went through a really rough period. So my switching

0:58:12.800 --> 0:58:15.600
<v Speaker 1>gears and focusing on being a dad for about three

0:58:15.680 --> 0:58:17.760
<v Speaker 1>years was one of the best things I ever did

0:58:17.800 --> 0:58:20.040
<v Speaker 1>in my life. It probably wasn't the best thing for

0:58:20.040 --> 0:58:23.640
<v Speaker 1>Real Networks because the we tried to other people into

0:58:23.640 --> 0:58:25.080
<v Speaker 1>the company who were kind of like the drummer and

0:58:25.120 --> 0:58:29.000
<v Speaker 1>spinal tap unfortunately if that's the music ANALYSI people know.

0:58:29.920 --> 0:58:34.000
<v Speaker 1>But it was appropriate for me personally to to really

0:58:34.200 --> 0:58:36.960
<v Speaker 1>go deep in in family. And my kids are doing great,

0:58:37.320 --> 0:58:40.440
<v Speaker 1>uh great partner, Uh, my ex is doing super well.

0:58:40.480 --> 0:58:41.960
<v Speaker 1>The kids go back and forth in the two and

0:58:42.320 --> 0:58:43.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that we could have gotten there if

0:58:43.840 --> 0:58:45.960
<v Speaker 1>I had stayed, you know, full time. A real networks

0:58:45.960 --> 0:58:50.120
<v Speaker 1>the whole way through. And did you I mean, were

0:58:50.120 --> 0:58:53.000
<v Speaker 1>you in basically a house dad or were you a

0:58:53.080 --> 0:58:55.600
<v Speaker 1>VC during that period? So I was this thing called

0:58:55.640 --> 0:58:59.920
<v Speaker 1>a venture partner, which I it's a little bit like

0:59:00.080 --> 0:59:05.360
<v Speaker 1>the p massuseatists I wrote on on economists. Um, if

0:59:05.360 --> 0:59:08.200
<v Speaker 1>you want to be a VC, or think if you

0:59:08.240 --> 0:59:10.000
<v Speaker 1>think you might want to be a VC, if you

0:59:10.040 --> 0:59:12.320
<v Speaker 1>go be a venture partner at a firm, you learn

0:59:12.360 --> 0:59:14.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot. So Excel is an incredible firm. You know

0:59:14.640 --> 0:59:17.880
<v Speaker 1>they invested you know I mentioned us, but they Facebook

0:59:17.920 --> 0:59:20.680
<v Speaker 1>is probably their signature huge investment. They've had many other

0:59:20.760 --> 0:59:23.760
<v Speaker 1>successes over the years. You can go look at their website. Um.

0:59:24.000 --> 0:59:25.200
<v Speaker 1>And so what I would do is I would go

0:59:25.240 --> 0:59:27.880
<v Speaker 1>down to board to partner meetings once or twice a month,

0:59:28.200 --> 0:59:30.720
<v Speaker 1>and I would KiB its uh and give them feedback.

0:59:30.760 --> 0:59:33.560
<v Speaker 1>I probably made three or four investments with them. I

0:59:33.640 --> 0:59:35.080
<v Speaker 1>probably made, you know, in the period when I was

0:59:35.120 --> 0:59:38.840
<v Speaker 1>actually investing, I probably made fifty investments, UM, maybe a

0:59:38.920 --> 0:59:40.560
<v Speaker 1>quarter of them with Excel on a quarter of them

0:59:40.680 --> 0:59:43.040
<v Speaker 1>either on my own or with other venture enities. I

0:59:43.200 --> 0:59:46.160
<v Speaker 1>ended up deciding that I'm not wired to be a

0:59:46.160 --> 0:59:49.400
<v Speaker 1>good VC. UM. I like angel investing, which is very

0:59:49.440 --> 0:59:52.640
<v Speaker 1>different than a VC. But when you're a VC, uh,

0:59:52.680 --> 0:59:55.840
<v Speaker 1>it's this weird mix of you've got a partner partnership,

0:59:55.880 --> 0:59:59.320
<v Speaker 1>you are running shared money, but you're each individual responsible

0:59:59.320 --> 1:00:01.600
<v Speaker 1>for a deal. And if the chemistry is great with

1:00:01.640 --> 1:00:04.520
<v Speaker 1>the partners, I'm sure it can be great, but it's

1:00:04.600 --> 1:00:08.080
<v Speaker 1>very easy for these partnerships to fracture, depending on like

1:00:08.440 --> 1:00:10.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, which deals work, which deals don't work, who

1:00:10.440 --> 1:00:12.360
<v Speaker 1>gets credit for them, who doesn't get credit for them?

1:00:12.840 --> 1:00:15.800
<v Speaker 1>And Uh. To me, I'm much I much prefer to

1:00:15.840 --> 1:00:18.680
<v Speaker 1>do individual angel investing, which I do very little of

1:00:18.720 --> 1:00:20.360
<v Speaker 1>nowadays because I'm too busy. I do a little bit

1:00:20.360 --> 1:00:23.960
<v Speaker 1>of it. Uh. I prefer that to being part of

1:00:24.000 --> 1:00:27.160
<v Speaker 1>a professional venture fund. But I only know that because

1:00:27.200 --> 1:00:29.560
<v Speaker 1>I spent a couple of years sort of sitting around

1:00:29.600 --> 1:00:31.400
<v Speaker 1>the table with the Excel guys as they did their thing.

1:00:31.960 --> 1:00:34.840
<v Speaker 1>So at this late date, what are the main products

1:00:34.960 --> 1:00:38.000
<v Speaker 1>of Real Networks and where's the company going. So Real

1:00:38.040 --> 1:00:41.760
<v Speaker 1>Networks has four major growth initiatives going forward. Um and

1:00:41.800 --> 1:00:43.200
<v Speaker 1>you can say it's a late date, but for some

1:00:43.240 --> 1:00:46.800
<v Speaker 1>of these initiatives is actually super early. Um we one

1:00:46.880 --> 1:00:49.120
<v Speaker 1>is a consumer initiative that's actually in the games business.

1:00:49.120 --> 1:00:51.120
<v Speaker 1>We we had a games business that we spun up

1:00:51.120 --> 1:00:53.360
<v Speaker 1>in the nineties. Uh. It did well for a while

1:00:53.360 --> 1:00:55.040
<v Speaker 1>and then it lay follow and then I brought back

1:00:55.320 --> 1:00:58.080
<v Speaker 1>to the entrepreneurs that helped create the European business. It's

1:00:58.080 --> 1:01:01.200
<v Speaker 1>called game House. It's actually East in the Netherlands, and

1:01:01.240 --> 1:01:05.000
<v Speaker 1>it's at the intersection of of casual gameplay and storytelling.

1:01:05.320 --> 1:01:07.760
<v Speaker 1>So we have now about two dozen of what we

1:01:07.800 --> 1:01:10.440
<v Speaker 1>call these game House original stories, and we're in the

1:01:10.440 --> 1:01:13.360
<v Speaker 1>process of launching a subscription product around them. We for

1:01:13.400 --> 1:01:14.960
<v Speaker 1>the first couple years, we didn't have enough to make

1:01:14.960 --> 1:01:17.840
<v Speaker 1>a subscription, so we sold them individually, built a decent

1:01:17.880 --> 1:01:20.680
<v Speaker 1>business on it. It's about it's about million dollar business

1:01:20.720 --> 1:01:23.920
<v Speaker 1>something like that. But now with subscriptions, were pretty optimistic

1:01:24.080 --> 1:01:26.640
<v Speaker 1>that we can grow it significantly. And the team doing

1:01:26.680 --> 1:01:29.840
<v Speaker 1>that kind of rut Computers and Rakusen's are the two

1:01:29.840 --> 1:01:33.240
<v Speaker 1>guys who are in a jointly. They're fantastic entrepreneurs. They're uh,

1:01:33.480 --> 1:01:35.560
<v Speaker 1>they kind of both do both, but Eric is more

1:01:35.600 --> 1:01:37.840
<v Speaker 1>of the creative spark and Rutgerry is more of the

1:01:37.840 --> 1:01:40.240
<v Speaker 1>business guy. Although they both do both and they probably

1:01:40.600 --> 1:01:44.080
<v Speaker 1>um blanched my pigeonholing him in that way, but they

1:01:44.080 --> 1:01:46.920
<v Speaker 1>work together collaboratively. They do a fantastic job. I love

1:01:47.000 --> 1:01:49.800
<v Speaker 1>working with them, and Uh in that business, I think

1:01:50.160 --> 1:01:52.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm very optimistic about its future as a subscription business.

1:01:53.120 --> 1:01:55.400
<v Speaker 1>Then we have three B two B products, which is

1:01:55.720 --> 1:01:57.680
<v Speaker 1>something real has always had a foot in. Both we

1:01:57.760 --> 1:02:00.760
<v Speaker 1>make technology, we love consumers. Um. The one that when

1:02:00.760 --> 1:02:03.480
<v Speaker 1>I said, remember China, the one that's the most obscure,

1:02:04.160 --> 1:02:07.080
<v Speaker 1>but it's true, is we have a robust business of

1:02:07.160 --> 1:02:11.640
<v Speaker 1>licensing video compression technology in China. Uh and uh we

1:02:11.800 --> 1:02:14.480
<v Speaker 1>when I came back, it was clear that what happened

1:02:14.480 --> 1:02:17.160
<v Speaker 1>is and I'll explain why when Microsoft displaced us with

1:02:17.200 --> 1:02:18.640
<v Speaker 1>this thing I told you about where they got to

1:02:18.680 --> 1:02:21.200
<v Speaker 1>PC manufacturers and they say you only have to pay

1:02:21.280 --> 1:02:23.720
<v Speaker 1>us sixty dollars per windows if you do what we

1:02:23.760 --> 1:02:27.160
<v Speaker 1>say a hundred dollars. Otherwise, the Chinese manufacturers companies like

1:02:27.320 --> 1:02:29.920
<v Speaker 1>Legend which became Lenovo, or a great Wall or some

1:02:29.960 --> 1:02:33.160
<v Speaker 1>of these others. They basically told Microsoft, you know, I

1:02:33.160 --> 1:02:36.080
<v Speaker 1>only shipped a hundred thousand PCs this year, here's your money.

1:02:36.120 --> 1:02:38.240
<v Speaker 1>And when Microsoft said, no, we think you shift a million,

1:02:38.440 --> 1:02:41.800
<v Speaker 1>They're like, you know, maybe only ship fifty. So so

1:02:42.200 --> 1:02:45.640
<v Speaker 1>the Microsoft had less leverage in the Chinese market circuit

1:02:45.640 --> 1:02:49.440
<v Speaker 1>two thousand to use this tactic of using their marketing

1:02:49.480 --> 1:02:51.680
<v Speaker 1>car program to push us out of the market. So

1:02:51.760 --> 1:02:54.040
<v Speaker 1>we never got displaced in the Chinese market. So our

1:02:54.120 --> 1:02:57.040
<v Speaker 1>video format, which is called r M v B continuous

1:02:57.040 --> 1:03:00.400
<v Speaker 1>to be very popular. So about three years ago three

1:03:00.400 --> 1:03:02.440
<v Speaker 1>four years ago, I spot up a team where commissioned

1:03:02.440 --> 1:03:04.240
<v Speaker 1>the team to spun up to build a next generation

1:03:04.320 --> 1:03:06.680
<v Speaker 1>video technology. We put half the R and D team

1:03:06.680 --> 1:03:08.840
<v Speaker 1>in Seattle, half in Beijing, and we have a next

1:03:08.840 --> 1:03:13.360
<v Speaker 1>generation video technology called r MHD that is doing very

1:03:13.360 --> 1:03:15.640
<v Speaker 1>well in China. We have a partnership with one of

1:03:15.640 --> 1:03:18.480
<v Speaker 1>the three largest broadcasters in China called c I the

1:03:18.600 --> 1:03:23.600
<v Speaker 1>end UH their affiliate just launched uh in uh in

1:03:23.640 --> 1:03:26.000
<v Speaker 1>the in the first phase of of launch in China.

1:03:26.320 --> 1:03:28.600
<v Speaker 1>So that business is going to do very well basically

1:03:28.680 --> 1:03:32.760
<v Speaker 1>licensing video technology. That's next generation technology. It's better than

1:03:32.800 --> 1:03:35.560
<v Speaker 1>the next generation m PEG. It's very competitive with the

1:03:35.600 --> 1:03:38.240
<v Speaker 1>best in the world. Whether we bring that technology from

1:03:38.320 --> 1:03:40.480
<v Speaker 1>China the rest of the world, we'll see. It's something

1:03:40.520 --> 1:03:41.760
<v Speaker 1>we want to do, but we've got to get into

1:03:41.760 --> 1:03:44.280
<v Speaker 1>the chip sets. We've got to build out the infrastructure first.

1:03:44.480 --> 1:03:47.720
<v Speaker 1>So those are two businesses. The third business is actually

1:03:47.840 --> 1:03:52.120
<v Speaker 1>very obscure, but it's very interesting. It's around messaging. UH.

1:03:52.240 --> 1:03:54.840
<v Speaker 1>Do you know how much like robotcalling and spam you're

1:03:54.840 --> 1:03:57.800
<v Speaker 1>getting on your phone. Uh. We built a product called

1:03:57.880 --> 1:04:01.560
<v Speaker 1>Context that's designed to cut down on TECHT spamming and

1:04:01.560 --> 1:04:05.320
<v Speaker 1>then also providing a way for message UH providers to

1:04:05.480 --> 1:04:08.800
<v Speaker 1>classify their messages to basically create more structure on them

1:04:08.960 --> 1:04:10.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot of stuff that's done an email and not

1:04:10.560 --> 1:04:12.960
<v Speaker 1>done in texting. The reason we've gotten that business is

1:04:13.000 --> 1:04:16.480
<v Speaker 1>we have a related business that is the powers what's

1:04:16.520 --> 1:04:18.720
<v Speaker 1>called inter carry messaging. So if you're on Verizon on

1:04:18.840 --> 1:04:21.120
<v Speaker 1>an A, T and T and I send you a text,

1:04:21.360 --> 1:04:24.240
<v Speaker 1>it goes over our inter carry messaging software. So we

1:04:24.280 --> 1:04:27.680
<v Speaker 1>have the software that is the highly reliable but invisible

1:04:27.960 --> 1:04:30.280
<v Speaker 1>layer that about a billion and a half message today

1:04:30.280 --> 1:04:33.080
<v Speaker 1>travel over. So that team used that expertise to build

1:04:33.120 --> 1:04:35.760
<v Speaker 1>this next product, which is called Context and that's just

1:04:35.960 --> 1:04:38.160
<v Speaker 1>rolling out. And then the fourth, which may be the

1:04:38.200 --> 1:04:41.240
<v Speaker 1>coolest of them all, is a computer vision platform called

1:04:41.280 --> 1:04:44.040
<v Speaker 1>real c V, which leverages all of our expertise and

1:04:44.120 --> 1:04:49.000
<v Speaker 1>video technology to do phenomenal face recognition. We haven't yet

1:04:49.040 --> 1:04:51.480
<v Speaker 1>described what markets are going after that, but we've got

1:04:51.520 --> 1:04:54.400
<v Speaker 1>some fantastic ideas that we think are gonna go are

1:04:54.440 --> 1:04:58.479
<v Speaker 1>gonna make people really happy to have computer based face

1:04:58.560 --> 1:05:02.400
<v Speaker 1>recognition be applied, not in creepy situations, but in situations

1:05:02.400 --> 1:05:04.960
<v Speaker 1>where it's actually good for society to have people know

1:05:05.240 --> 1:05:09.560
<v Speaker 1>who's who. Okay, you're also very heavenly political. If one

1:05:09.640 --> 1:05:13.000
<v Speaker 1>follows your Twitter feed, most of it is politics. You

1:05:13.160 --> 1:05:17.920
<v Speaker 1>invested in Air America, So what was your thinking of

1:05:17.960 --> 1:05:21.800
<v Speaker 1>the Air America and where are you relative to politics today? Well,

1:05:21.840 --> 1:05:23.480
<v Speaker 1>so the reason I got involved in America, and that

1:05:23.520 --> 1:05:27.280
<v Speaker 1>goes back over a decade, UH is UH I was

1:05:27.440 --> 1:05:31.520
<v Speaker 1>very frustrated by the rise of UH Fox News and

1:05:31.640 --> 1:05:36.160
<v Speaker 1>the the right media right that there was no longer

1:05:36.880 --> 1:05:39.880
<v Speaker 1>UH any kind of There was not any kind of

1:05:40.480 --> 1:05:42.840
<v Speaker 1>balance because you had the mainstream media which is very

1:05:42.880 --> 1:05:46.880
<v Speaker 1>much covers the horse rays tries to have journalistic ethics, etcetera.

1:05:46.920 --> 1:05:48.960
<v Speaker 1>And then you had Fox operating as kind of a

1:05:49.360 --> 1:05:53.280
<v Speaker 1>right word magnet that was not operating within journalistic bounds

1:05:53.280 --> 1:05:56.200
<v Speaker 1>in my view even back then, but was sort of

1:05:56.640 --> 1:06:00.320
<v Speaker 1>being uh like talk radio and television. Uh also had

1:06:00.320 --> 1:06:02.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot of right wing talk radio. So the question

1:06:02.760 --> 1:06:04.760
<v Speaker 1>was why can't why why can't there be a progressive

1:06:04.800 --> 1:06:08.800
<v Speaker 1>alternative just to rebalance society. So I got to know, uh,

1:06:08.920 --> 1:06:11.800
<v Speaker 1>somebody who may talk about in a minute, Al Franken

1:06:12.240 --> 1:06:16.040
<v Speaker 1>Uh through some people I knew, uh, and Al got

1:06:16.080 --> 1:06:19.040
<v Speaker 1>was interested in getting involved in this fledgling in Gold America,

1:06:19.360 --> 1:06:21.560
<v Speaker 1>and he asked me for advice, and I said, well, all,

1:06:21.600 --> 1:06:22.959
<v Speaker 1>I think you should do it. I think it's gonna

1:06:23.000 --> 1:06:25.280
<v Speaker 1>I think you'll be fantastic. You know, Al had already

1:06:25.560 --> 1:06:28.200
<v Speaker 1>uh you know, he'd done Saturdayright Live, he'd written some

1:06:28.200 --> 1:06:30.680
<v Speaker 1>books that were very compelling, and I thought, Alex somebody

1:06:30.680 --> 1:06:34.440
<v Speaker 1>who could could really have a big impact. Um and uh,

1:06:34.760 --> 1:06:36.400
<v Speaker 1>but I said, I don't know about the people that

1:06:36.480 --> 1:06:37.919
<v Speaker 1>the people are backing yet. I don't know if it's

1:06:37.960 --> 1:06:41.120
<v Speaker 1>the resources anyway, So through Al I allowed myself to

1:06:41.120 --> 1:06:43.880
<v Speaker 1>get sucked in and became for a while the chairman

1:06:43.920 --> 1:06:46.320
<v Speaker 1>of this thing. Um. And it was very it was

1:06:46.360 --> 1:06:50.200
<v Speaker 1>financially not very robust. Uh it was. But we you know,

1:06:50.240 --> 1:06:52.720
<v Speaker 1>there's this there's this old expression, right, you know, the

1:06:52.720 --> 1:06:56.000
<v Speaker 1>patient operations was successful, but the patient died. Um. That's

1:06:56.080 --> 1:06:58.919
<v Speaker 1>kind of like what happened with Their America because through

1:06:59.000 --> 1:07:02.640
<v Speaker 1>Air America we created something that had critical mass around

1:07:02.680 --> 1:07:05.440
<v Speaker 1>progressive media. Rachel Maddow came from Air America. She was

1:07:05.440 --> 1:07:08.080
<v Speaker 1>one of our up and coming stars. Uh. And and

1:07:08.320 --> 1:07:10.960
<v Speaker 1>obviously Al played a huge role in it. Uh. You

1:07:10.960 --> 1:07:12.200
<v Speaker 1>know you you there are there are There are a

1:07:12.200 --> 1:07:14.160
<v Speaker 1>few other folks that are less famous that came up

1:07:14.200 --> 1:07:17.280
<v Speaker 1>to the ranks there. The whole way MSNBC started came

1:07:17.320 --> 1:07:20.560
<v Speaker 1>out of the um, the sort of the ashes, if

1:07:20.600 --> 1:07:23.360
<v Speaker 1>you will, of Air America. So it was not a

1:07:23.440 --> 1:07:26.040
<v Speaker 1>good use of capital from the standpoint of making money,

1:07:26.040 --> 1:07:27.680
<v Speaker 1>but I kind of knew that. But I think it

1:07:27.720 --> 1:07:30.480
<v Speaker 1>did play a catalytic roll. Um. It took a while,

1:07:30.840 --> 1:07:32.959
<v Speaker 1>uh in two thousand fours when it started, it didn't

1:07:32.960 --> 1:07:36.240
<v Speaker 1>move the meter enough to change the outcome there. But

1:07:36.520 --> 1:07:40.760
<v Speaker 1>over time I think we do have more you know,

1:07:40.840 --> 1:07:44.400
<v Speaker 1>be it Huving to Post, be it, the MSNBC more

1:07:44.440 --> 1:07:48.479
<v Speaker 1>outlets that are that give voice to progressive ideas and value.

1:07:48.480 --> 1:07:51.200
<v Speaker 1>So I'm not involved it anymore, but I'm glad I

1:07:51.240 --> 1:07:53.440
<v Speaker 1>did it, even though it was from a cash on

1:07:53.520 --> 1:07:56.120
<v Speaker 1>cash standpoint, is a bad investment. Okay, So the big

1:07:56.160 --> 1:08:00.120
<v Speaker 1>issue today and technology is privacy. So what's your a

1:08:00.160 --> 1:08:03.320
<v Speaker 1>point on what's going on there with privacy and data? Uh?

1:08:03.680 --> 1:08:07.560
<v Speaker 1>I think that the reckoning that's happening now is important

1:08:07.880 --> 1:08:13.560
<v Speaker 1>and has to happen. I think that, uh remember Facebook's

1:08:14.120 --> 1:08:18.360
<v Speaker 1>used to have their slogan move fast and break stuff. UM,

1:08:18.439 --> 1:08:21.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't think they meant to break democracy, but I

1:08:21.040 --> 1:08:25.160
<v Speaker 1>think that's largely what happened. Uh And and and it

1:08:25.280 --> 1:08:30.120
<v Speaker 1>happened because it became too easy for bad actors. Probably

1:08:30.160 --> 1:08:32.840
<v Speaker 1>Cambridge Analytics could be one of those bad actors, uh

1:08:32.960 --> 1:08:37.519
<v Speaker 1>to scoop up huge amounts of data on people UH

1:08:37.560 --> 1:08:42.120
<v Speaker 1>that that can be used to uh both target uh

1:08:42.160 --> 1:08:45.880
<v Speaker 1>them and influence them uh in all kinds of pernicious ways.

1:08:46.000 --> 1:08:49.200
<v Speaker 1>And so so from my standpoint, we need to have

1:08:49.360 --> 1:08:54.800
<v Speaker 1>much more rigorous uh laws and enforcement of those laws

1:08:54.840 --> 1:08:58.200
<v Speaker 1>around data privacy. Uh. And and you know, for instance,

1:08:58.240 --> 1:09:01.280
<v Speaker 1>this this new European Ladge GDPR, which I think it

1:09:01.280 --> 1:09:03.960
<v Speaker 1>becomes effective like amount a month from now, I think

1:09:03.960 --> 1:09:06.160
<v Speaker 1>the middle end of May. I think it's a huge

1:09:06.200 --> 1:09:08.880
<v Speaker 1>step forward in the right direction. What I'm seeing is

1:09:08.920 --> 1:09:11.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot of companies are actually used because Europe is

1:09:12.000 --> 1:09:14.400
<v Speaker 1>such a big part of their business. Whatever policies they're

1:09:14.400 --> 1:09:18.120
<v Speaker 1>putting in place for um uh for Europe, they're putting

1:09:18.120 --> 1:09:20.240
<v Speaker 1>in place globally. But I think the U s should

1:09:20.360 --> 1:09:23.800
<v Speaker 1>should have its own GDPR law not rely on the Europeans, right,

1:09:23.840 --> 1:09:26.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, we would We wouldn't say, well, the Europeans

1:09:26.200 --> 1:09:28.200
<v Speaker 1>are taken care of air traffic safety, we don't need

1:09:28.240 --> 1:09:30.200
<v Speaker 1>our own air traffic safety standards. Of course we do,

1:09:30.439 --> 1:09:32.599
<v Speaker 1>and maybe they'll be the same as Europe, maybe they'll

1:09:32.600 --> 1:09:34.519
<v Speaker 1>be a little different or something, but we should have

1:09:34.560 --> 1:09:38.720
<v Speaker 1>our own equivalent GDPR in the US. Absolutely agree with

1:09:38.760 --> 1:09:43.360
<v Speaker 1>that in terms of what it would mean in practice.

1:09:43.640 --> 1:09:46.760
<v Speaker 1>I still think most people would would be willing to

1:09:48.680 --> 1:09:52.479
<v Speaker 1>uh use these social media services uh and would use

1:09:52.520 --> 1:09:55.240
<v Speaker 1>the ad supported versions of them. The approach that I've

1:09:55.280 --> 1:09:57.759
<v Speaker 1>taken is I don't think I've had I think every

1:09:57.760 --> 1:10:01.679
<v Speaker 1>post I've ever posted on Facebook, I've basically put Twitter

1:10:01.760 --> 1:10:04.080
<v Speaker 1>Twitter rolls on it. I assume that it's public because

1:10:04.080 --> 1:10:07.160
<v Speaker 1>my assumption is anything I post, if I share it

1:10:07.200 --> 1:10:10.000
<v Speaker 1>with fifty friends, I've shared it with the world anyway.

1:10:10.360 --> 1:10:12.479
<v Speaker 1>So I don't post pictures of my kids on social

1:10:12.520 --> 1:10:15.800
<v Speaker 1>media just as a matter of personal preference, personal truth,

1:10:15.840 --> 1:10:17.800
<v Speaker 1>and privacy. If I want to send pictures of my kids,

1:10:17.800 --> 1:10:20.080
<v Speaker 1>I email to my friends and I trust that they're

1:10:20.080 --> 1:10:23.080
<v Speaker 1>not gonna you know, Poston social media. Um, anything I

1:10:23.120 --> 1:10:25.599
<v Speaker 1>post publicly assume you know, I'm gonna have to live

1:10:25.640 --> 1:10:27.160
<v Speaker 1>with it twenty years from now. If I said something

1:10:27.360 --> 1:10:29.600
<v Speaker 1>obnoxious about Trump, and you know, Trump gets to know

1:10:29.640 --> 1:10:33.560
<v Speaker 1>about prize or something, gonna have to eat crow, that's possible. Um,

1:10:33.680 --> 1:10:37.360
<v Speaker 1>But but I you know, it's uh, my my assumption

1:10:37.479 --> 1:10:41.360
<v Speaker 1>was and with this anything. So my daughter is now eleven, UM,

1:10:41.439 --> 1:10:43.519
<v Speaker 1>and she rides a school bus because she now goes

1:10:43.560 --> 1:10:46.800
<v Speaker 1>to a Catholic girls school that she has to take

1:10:46.800 --> 1:10:49.920
<v Speaker 1>a bus to go to. UM and uh, it's fantastical,

1:10:50.000 --> 1:10:52.519
<v Speaker 1>great for her. But now she needed a phone. So

1:10:52.760 --> 1:10:54.320
<v Speaker 1>she was like, well, Dad, can I have an iPhone?

1:10:54.680 --> 1:10:56.519
<v Speaker 1>She's eleven years old. I said no, So I got

1:10:56.520 --> 1:10:59.400
<v Speaker 1>her a five year old LG flip phone with a

1:10:59.479 --> 1:11:02.240
<v Speaker 1>text keep word when you can buy an eBay by

1:11:02.280 --> 1:11:05.400
<v Speaker 1>the way, um, And she's mad at me about this.

1:11:05.400 --> 1:11:07.960
<v Speaker 1>This is like, this is like the biggest like and

1:11:08.160 --> 1:11:11.200
<v Speaker 1>so she she's like, Dad, all my friends have iPhones.

1:11:12.080 --> 1:11:15.000
<v Speaker 1>And I said, what about Andy's daughter? And he's a

1:11:15.000 --> 1:11:17.519
<v Speaker 1>guy worked with a Microsoft, and I know that Andy

1:11:17.600 --> 1:11:20.639
<v Speaker 1>is also vigilant about this stuff. And she said, well,

1:11:20.680 --> 1:11:23.479
<v Speaker 1>Andy's dad won't even let his Naomi get a flip

1:11:23.479 --> 1:11:25.920
<v Speaker 1>phone for two more years. And I said, why don't

1:11:25.920 --> 1:11:27.519
<v Speaker 1>we go to lunch with Andy and his daughter and

1:11:27.560 --> 1:11:29.960
<v Speaker 1>talk about this? And I said, no, no no, Dad, we

1:11:29.960 --> 1:11:32.800
<v Speaker 1>don't need to do that. So my point is that

1:11:33.240 --> 1:11:36.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot of what makes how to make social media

1:11:36.479 --> 1:11:40.320
<v Speaker 1>healthy for kids and not unhealthy is actually parents understanding

1:11:40.320 --> 1:11:43.120
<v Speaker 1>that there are choices. The choice isn't give him an

1:11:43.120 --> 1:11:45.360
<v Speaker 1>iPhone or not. You know, yeah, you gotta go to

1:11:45.400 --> 1:11:47.240
<v Speaker 1>let your way to find a five year old flip phone.

1:11:47.680 --> 1:11:50.120
<v Speaker 1>But it works just fine. She can text and call us,

1:11:50.360 --> 1:11:51.920
<v Speaker 1>which is all at the age of eleven I want

1:11:51.960 --> 1:11:54.000
<v Speaker 1>her to do. When she's thirteen. I'm sure she'll have

1:11:54.040 --> 1:11:57.000
<v Speaker 1>an iPhone. We'll probably have policies on you know that

1:11:57.040 --> 1:11:58.400
<v Speaker 1>she has to show us all of her text. I'm

1:11:58.439 --> 1:12:01.680
<v Speaker 1>sure she'll get around them in some ways, but it

1:12:01.840 --> 1:12:05.479
<v Speaker 1>to me, Um, the pernicioners of social media comes with

1:12:05.560 --> 1:12:09.080
<v Speaker 1>the interaction between the fact that most people don't understand

1:12:09.080 --> 1:12:12.360
<v Speaker 1>what this stuff is and the fact that the large

1:12:12.360 --> 1:12:15.599
<v Speaker 1>scale companies running it we're too willing to take advantage

1:12:15.600 --> 1:12:18.000
<v Speaker 1>of that naivete. So I don't think the solution is

1:12:18.040 --> 1:12:20.599
<v Speaker 1>no social media. I think the solution is better regulation

1:12:20.640 --> 1:12:28.280
<v Speaker 1>and better education. We'll plause here for a brief moment

1:12:28.320 --> 1:12:31.759
<v Speaker 1>and get right back to CEO of Real Networks, Rob Glazer.

1:12:33.520 --> 1:12:35.760
<v Speaker 1>As you know, I'm a writer and you can read

1:12:35.840 --> 1:12:38.920
<v Speaker 1>my work at left sets dot com. In addition of

1:12:39.040 --> 1:12:41.920
<v Speaker 1>reading my commentary on music tech in the world at large.

1:12:42.160 --> 1:12:44.400
<v Speaker 1>There'll be the first to find out when we've published

1:12:44.400 --> 1:12:47.200
<v Speaker 1>a new podcast. Go to left sets dot com and

1:12:47.320 --> 1:12:51.120
<v Speaker 1>sign up for the news left Now More with CEO

1:12:51.160 --> 1:12:54.160
<v Speaker 1>of Real Networks, Rob Glazer, recorded live with the Music

1:12:54.200 --> 1:12:59.600
<v Speaker 1>Media Summit in Santa Barbara, California. Okay, it's time for

1:12:59.720 --> 1:13:02.679
<v Speaker 1>question and from the audience, raise your hand. Jim has

1:13:02.680 --> 1:13:06.439
<v Speaker 1>a microphone, and please talk into the microphone and ask

1:13:06.439 --> 1:13:08.799
<v Speaker 1>a question as opposed to the basic a statement. Okay,

1:13:09.080 --> 1:13:14.320
<v Speaker 1>before the first question, Um, quick story. So, when we

1:13:14.320 --> 1:13:18.559
<v Speaker 1>were about to reach out to um Rob about coming here,

1:13:19.240 --> 1:13:21.599
<v Speaker 1>I spelled his name with a Z and I get

1:13:21.640 --> 1:13:26.160
<v Speaker 1>this note from Bob, you know, chastising me, like, dude,

1:13:26.200 --> 1:13:29.440
<v Speaker 1>you've got to spell people's names correctly if you're gonna.

1:13:29.560 --> 1:13:33.519
<v Speaker 1>And so then Rob gets here today and and uh

1:13:33.720 --> 1:13:36.120
<v Speaker 1>looks at his name tag and it has two essays.

1:13:38.280 --> 1:13:41.600
<v Speaker 1>So I have to apologize for that and take ownership

1:13:41.680 --> 1:13:44.040
<v Speaker 1>of it. And I don't know how it happened. Well,

1:13:44.200 --> 1:13:46.240
<v Speaker 1>I'll tell you a story about my daughter, which um

1:13:46.560 --> 1:13:48.120
<v Speaker 1>since I don't show a pictures of the internet. So

1:13:48.439 --> 1:13:50.719
<v Speaker 1>her name is Eva E v A. And it turns

1:13:50.760 --> 1:13:53.439
<v Speaker 1>out that in the current generation that's a moderately popular

1:13:53.479 --> 1:13:56.280
<v Speaker 1>in but apparently because of Reef Witherspoon, Ava a Via

1:13:56.439 --> 1:13:58.200
<v Speaker 1>is like one of the five most popular girl names.

1:13:58.600 --> 1:14:01.120
<v Speaker 1>So about five years ago, when she was six years old,

1:14:01.320 --> 1:14:03.320
<v Speaker 1>she goes through T S A and the T S

1:14:03.360 --> 1:14:08.519
<v Speaker 1>A guy looks at her and says Ava Glazer, and

1:14:08.600 --> 1:14:10.400
<v Speaker 1>she looks back at him. T s A guy you

1:14:10.400 --> 1:14:13.080
<v Speaker 1>know she doesn't know, noting its assassin, she says, actually

1:14:13.160 --> 1:14:16.880
<v Speaker 1>it's Eva, and the T S A Gui apparently isn't

1:14:16.920 --> 1:14:19.120
<v Speaker 1>used to being sassed by six year old kids. Uh

1:14:19.280 --> 1:14:21.000
<v Speaker 1>hands her back the passport and in a kind of

1:14:21.000 --> 1:14:26.360
<v Speaker 1>exaggerated way says, excuse me, Eva, And then her reply is,

1:14:26.560 --> 1:14:33.519
<v Speaker 1>actually it's a common mistake. So it's actually a common mistake.

1:14:36.360 --> 1:14:39.920
<v Speaker 1>I have a couple of technical questions, So tracking all

1:14:39.960 --> 1:14:44.519
<v Speaker 1>the video technology but you've been doing since where do

1:14:44.560 --> 1:14:46.800
<v Speaker 1>you where do you think the technology is moving with

1:14:47.040 --> 1:14:49.400
<v Speaker 1>like AI and like fake app and all that stuff

1:14:49.439 --> 1:14:51.040
<v Speaker 1>that's going on, and how big a problem is that

1:14:51.080 --> 1:14:53.200
<v Speaker 1>going to be? And then following up on that with

1:14:53.320 --> 1:14:59.080
<v Speaker 1>AI and the Sergey brand founder's letter about saying responsibilities

1:14:59.080 --> 1:15:01.599
<v Speaker 1>in AI? Where you see AI and what's your feeling

1:15:01.600 --> 1:15:03.600
<v Speaker 1>on that? Well, the first one is easier than the

1:15:03.600 --> 1:15:05.599
<v Speaker 1>second one because the second one is like so open ended,

1:15:05.680 --> 1:15:07.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, you get to the you know, the Elon

1:15:07.520 --> 1:15:11.280
<v Speaker 1>Mesk debates with everybody that stuff and Sergey Uh. So

1:15:11.560 --> 1:15:13.519
<v Speaker 1>there's gonna be a really interesting convergence in the next

1:15:13.560 --> 1:15:18.400
<v Speaker 1>five years between uh C g UH computer graphics and

1:15:18.520 --> 1:15:22.280
<v Speaker 1>natural video. We already see it today with augmented reality

1:15:22.280 --> 1:15:24.240
<v Speaker 1>because you think about what it augumented reality is. It's

1:15:24.560 --> 1:15:27.640
<v Speaker 1>it's reality where you take a video and you superimpose

1:15:27.720 --> 1:15:30.920
<v Speaker 1>in some way something that looks very lifelike that is

1:15:30.920 --> 1:15:35.720
<v Speaker 1>not actually in the scene, and so augmented reality is

1:15:35.760 --> 1:15:38.559
<v Speaker 1>incredibly powerful, you know, with lots of utility for it,

1:15:38.640 --> 1:15:40.920
<v Speaker 1>but also means that you can no longer trust the

1:15:40.960 --> 1:15:44.160
<v Speaker 1>authenticity of an image or an experience. Uh. And that's

1:15:44.160 --> 1:15:45.840
<v Speaker 1>been going from for a while. I mean people have

1:15:45.880 --> 1:15:48.880
<v Speaker 1>been uh, you know, retouching photos for years, you know,

1:15:48.960 --> 1:15:51.400
<v Speaker 1>the whole You can argue that you know, uh, you know,

1:15:51.800 --> 1:15:54.760
<v Speaker 1>People Magazine and the like are our pure examples of

1:15:54.760 --> 1:15:57.360
<v Speaker 1>the fact you can't trust to photograph, uh, you know,

1:15:57.400 --> 1:15:59.800
<v Speaker 1>where the images they show of people looking for more

1:16:00.000 --> 1:16:03.040
<v Speaker 1>itiful than they ever could look or have looked. But

1:16:03.080 --> 1:16:05.000
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna get worse, and it's gonna apply to video.

1:16:05.920 --> 1:16:07.880
<v Speaker 1>I think we'll probably have to come up with some

1:16:09.080 --> 1:16:13.560
<v Speaker 1>authentication techniques on video that involve some combination of triangulation

1:16:13.560 --> 1:16:16.880
<v Speaker 1>and water marking. And by triangulation, I mean literally when

1:16:16.960 --> 1:16:19.439
<v Speaker 1>you get the same image with the same time code

1:16:19.800 --> 1:16:23.040
<v Speaker 1>from multiple cameras and multiple advantage points, and then you

1:16:23.040 --> 1:16:26.240
<v Speaker 1>you have those water marked by some kind of trust authority,

1:16:26.320 --> 1:16:28.360
<v Speaker 1>so you know that that's the image of what really

1:16:28.400 --> 1:16:32.840
<v Speaker 1>happened and the uh and that's that whole how you

1:16:32.920 --> 1:16:38.519
<v Speaker 1>create um trust authorities that people respect for factual things.

1:16:38.960 --> 1:16:41.320
<v Speaker 1>Is a huge problem you have already in in you know,

1:16:41.360 --> 1:16:43.639
<v Speaker 1>in text and quote unquote fake news, and it's gonna

1:16:43.640 --> 1:16:46.760
<v Speaker 1>get even worse as this uh, you know, connection between

1:16:46.760 --> 1:16:49.799
<v Speaker 1>computer generated video and natural video gets deeper and deeper.

1:16:49.840 --> 1:16:52.920
<v Speaker 1>But hopefully we'll solve that problem because you know, and

1:16:53.080 --> 1:16:55.200
<v Speaker 1>and we're living in weird times, right because at the

1:16:55.240 --> 1:16:58.240
<v Speaker 1>same time, there's all this forensic stuff that gets that

1:16:58.240 --> 1:17:00.960
<v Speaker 1>that gets done, like the Golden a killer got caught

1:17:01.240 --> 1:17:04.519
<v Speaker 1>because of consumer DNA websites that were used by law

1:17:04.640 --> 1:17:08.160
<v Speaker 1>enforcement to track relatives of the guy. So that's a

1:17:08.200 --> 1:17:11.679
<v Speaker 1>case where data was used to solve a crime. Um

1:17:11.720 --> 1:17:14.760
<v Speaker 1>that where you actually were able to combine gumshoe work

1:17:14.840 --> 1:17:17.240
<v Speaker 1>with data. And you know, he'll go to a trial

1:17:17.320 --> 1:17:19.840
<v Speaker 1>and you know, he's guilty, instantly proven guilty, but it

1:17:19.960 --> 1:17:23.160
<v Speaker 1>sounds like he's probably the guy. Uh, And they got

1:17:23.240 --> 1:17:26.320
<v Speaker 1>him through science that authentically figured out who he was

1:17:26.360 --> 1:17:28.599
<v Speaker 1>based on you know, DNA from thirty years ago they

1:17:28.600 --> 1:17:31.519
<v Speaker 1>got put in a vault somewhere. So there's cross currents here.

1:17:32.080 --> 1:17:33.600
<v Speaker 1>But I do think for video, we're going to have

1:17:33.680 --> 1:17:38.240
<v Speaker 1>to create strategies for validating authentic video rather than just

1:17:38.439 --> 1:17:41.559
<v Speaker 1>looks realistic to me, because sometimes it might be just

1:17:41.600 --> 1:17:46.439
<v Speaker 1>a brilliant fake. On the second point about ai UH,

1:17:46.800 --> 1:17:50.240
<v Speaker 1>there's no question that there are certain categories of jobs

1:17:50.280 --> 1:17:53.240
<v Speaker 1>that will be massively disrupted by a i UH. Like

1:17:53.360 --> 1:17:56.960
<v Speaker 1>let's take like a radiologist, for instance. The best radiologists

1:17:57.360 --> 1:18:02.639
<v Speaker 1>can find things that that mediocre radiologists can't find, and

1:18:03.000 --> 1:18:05.720
<v Speaker 1>the best AI system can probably find things that the

1:18:05.760 --> 1:18:09.639
<v Speaker 1>best radiologists can't find. Is that good for society? Yes,

1:18:09.680 --> 1:18:13.200
<v Speaker 1>it's good to have better radiology. Is it good for radiologists?

1:18:13.960 --> 1:18:16.200
<v Speaker 1>Probably the best ones will still do fine. Probably the

1:18:16.240 --> 1:18:19.040
<v Speaker 1>mediocre ones will will find that in their job being

1:18:19.040 --> 1:18:21.200
<v Speaker 1>outsourced to India, the job got outsourced to a computer.

1:18:21.640 --> 1:18:25.360
<v Speaker 1>So there's gonna be economic disruption around from AI, for sure.

1:18:26.120 --> 1:18:28.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that. I take the view that you

1:18:28.080 --> 1:18:29.479
<v Speaker 1>know we're gonna have the problem that you had in

1:18:29.520 --> 1:18:32.040
<v Speaker 1>two thousand one with how where they're going to take over.

1:18:32.439 --> 1:18:35.040
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a little bit of a stretch. But

1:18:35.120 --> 1:18:37.320
<v Speaker 1>I think the economic disruption that's going to come from

1:18:37.960 --> 1:18:40.519
<v Speaker 1>AI is gonna be huge. Um, But I think it

1:18:40.520 --> 1:18:43.160
<v Speaker 1>takes longer than you think. Like, for instance, I'm personally

1:18:43.240 --> 1:18:45.920
<v Speaker 1>quite bearish on self driving cars. I think it's not

1:18:45.960 --> 1:18:50.320
<v Speaker 1>gonna be self driving cars as a phenomenon replacing taxi drivers.

1:18:50.680 --> 1:18:55.880
<v Speaker 1>Uh won't happen uh before Let's say, um, and that's

1:18:55.880 --> 1:18:58.479
<v Speaker 1>a bearer's few compared to some. There'll be scenarios where

1:18:58.520 --> 1:19:01.479
<v Speaker 1>augmentation is good, Like, for instance, you're driving and you

1:19:01.520 --> 1:19:03.800
<v Speaker 1>start to fall asleep. It'll save a bunch of lives

1:19:03.800 --> 1:19:07.200
<v Speaker 1>in that case. Uh, that's a good thing. Um, Somewhat

1:19:07.280 --> 1:19:09.719
<v Speaker 1>somewhat that will be maybe because it notices your braiding

1:19:09.760 --> 1:19:12.080
<v Speaker 1>pattern and it wakes you up by by you know,

1:19:12.320 --> 1:19:14.840
<v Speaker 1>giving you a little bit of shake. Maybe it'll be

1:19:14.840 --> 1:19:17.200
<v Speaker 1>because it prevents you from u steering into a rail

1:19:17.520 --> 1:19:20.200
<v Speaker 1>and then it wakes you up. But pure that's augmentation.

1:19:20.280 --> 1:19:23.879
<v Speaker 1>So I'm bullish on that big picture. I'm a technology optimist.

1:19:23.920 --> 1:19:27.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean I called uh my company Progressive Networks before

1:19:27.000 --> 1:19:29.280
<v Speaker 1>we ended up changing the real networks foundation is the

1:19:29.280 --> 1:19:31.919
<v Speaker 1>Glazer Progress Foundation. I believe in the idea of progress,

1:19:32.240 --> 1:19:34.000
<v Speaker 1>but I don't think it's an unguided missile. I think

1:19:34.000 --> 1:19:36.439
<v Speaker 1>you've got to make very conscious social choices on how

1:19:36.680 --> 1:19:42.240
<v Speaker 1>you use the technology. Question over here, Um, two things.

1:19:42.680 --> 1:19:45.919
<v Speaker 1>One is recently on I think it was on CNN.

1:19:46.439 --> 1:19:50.000
<v Speaker 1>They were showing some augmented video of Obama and but

1:19:50.040 --> 1:19:53.479
<v Speaker 1>they were interviewing a company that actually has software to

1:19:53.520 --> 1:19:57.839
<v Speaker 1>detect that. So maybe there's a future with those companies

1:19:57.880 --> 1:20:02.040
<v Speaker 1>and embedding their software. But secondly, I don't know if

1:20:02.080 --> 1:20:04.640
<v Speaker 1>anyone else has this question, But you worked for Microsoft

1:20:04.680 --> 1:20:08.680
<v Speaker 1>all those years when you had to deal with them

1:20:08.800 --> 1:20:14.439
<v Speaker 1>um trying to basically bury you, didn't you at any

1:20:14.479 --> 1:20:18.320
<v Speaker 1>point reach out to them and see if we could

1:20:18.360 --> 1:20:20.800
<v Speaker 1>make a deal? Or because I didn't, hang I did

1:20:20.840 --> 1:20:23.320
<v Speaker 1>I skipped over that story. I mean, Bob asked amazing questions,

1:20:23.320 --> 1:20:25.320
<v Speaker 1>but you can only cover so much stuff. So in

1:20:25.800 --> 1:20:28.920
<v Speaker 1>what happened in ninety and remember the years, right? So

1:20:30.200 --> 1:20:34.400
<v Speaker 1>uh in nine seven we came out with real real

1:20:34.479 --> 1:20:39.120
<v Speaker 1>video and then uh uh later that year or was it,

1:20:41.400 --> 1:20:43.960
<v Speaker 1>we heard that Microsoft was about to buy our biggest competitor,

1:20:44.000 --> 1:20:47.120
<v Speaker 1>coming called the Extreme. Uh, and so we we went

1:20:47.160 --> 1:20:49.760
<v Speaker 1>to Microsoft. We said, rather than buying the Extreme, why

1:20:49.800 --> 1:20:51.519
<v Speaker 1>don't we do a deal with you? And so we

1:20:51.560 --> 1:20:53.760
<v Speaker 1>did a licensing deal. When we sold Microsoft ten percent

1:20:53.800 --> 1:20:57.080
<v Speaker 1>of our company, licensed them our technology, gave them an

1:20:57.120 --> 1:20:59.519
<v Speaker 1>opportunity to buy another ten percent of our company and

1:20:59.560 --> 1:21:02.479
<v Speaker 1>gave it comortunity buy another license to US in order

1:21:02.560 --> 1:21:04.880
<v Speaker 1>to create a counter common roadmap. And that was the

1:21:04.920 --> 1:21:08.080
<v Speaker 1>deal done in good faith with the very senior people

1:21:08.080 --> 1:21:11.000
<v Speaker 1>to Microsoft. What happened then was just one of those

1:21:11.040 --> 1:21:13.040
<v Speaker 1>unfortunate things, and we had a plan B for it.

1:21:13.439 --> 1:21:16.880
<v Speaker 1>But what happened was Microsoft gave the responsibility of that

1:21:17.840 --> 1:21:20.479
<v Speaker 1>deal to the guys whose job previously was to compete

1:21:20.520 --> 1:21:23.200
<v Speaker 1>with us, and they hated our guts UM, and so

1:21:23.280 --> 1:21:24.880
<v Speaker 1>they did everything they could to try to put us

1:21:24.880 --> 1:21:27.679
<v Speaker 1>out of business by they took the software, the license

1:21:27.720 --> 1:21:30.280
<v Speaker 1>from US and they gave it away for free, trying

1:21:30.320 --> 1:21:33.840
<v Speaker 1>to create our server business UM. And we got around

1:21:33.880 --> 1:21:36.560
<v Speaker 1>that by coming out with a new version of the

1:21:36.560 --> 1:21:38.960
<v Speaker 1>product three months later than meant they were giving away

1:21:39.000 --> 1:21:41.800
<v Speaker 1>day old milk for free UM. And so there was

1:21:41.840 --> 1:21:44.479
<v Speaker 1>a lot of back and forth and maneuvering. UH. We

1:21:44.520 --> 1:21:46.400
<v Speaker 1>took a shot at trying to be aligned with them.

1:21:46.920 --> 1:21:49.280
<v Speaker 1>We meant it sincerely. We weren't time, We were not

1:21:49.320 --> 1:21:51.760
<v Speaker 1>trying to get into the PC operating system business. We

1:21:51.760 --> 1:21:54.320
<v Speaker 1>weren't trying to be a hostile competitor. There's but we

1:21:54.360 --> 1:21:57.799
<v Speaker 1>didn't We did not manage to UH get the team

1:21:57.840 --> 1:22:01.200
<v Speaker 1>that received the deal licensing deal to feel good about it.

1:22:01.680 --> 1:22:03.880
<v Speaker 1>That's life. So we took our best shot at trying

1:22:03.920 --> 1:22:05.760
<v Speaker 1>to trying to stay a line with them. Uh. And

1:22:05.800 --> 1:22:08.240
<v Speaker 1>then years later, we actually didn't end up initiating the

1:22:08.280 --> 1:22:10.519
<v Speaker 1>lawsuit until three or four years later because I kind

1:22:10.520 --> 1:22:12.720
<v Speaker 1>of wanted us to stabilize the company. And you know,

1:22:12.760 --> 1:22:14.760
<v Speaker 1>with these suits workers, you can look back three or

1:22:14.800 --> 1:22:17.920
<v Speaker 1>four years. So we waited until we were stable and

1:22:18.000 --> 1:22:19.840
<v Speaker 1>we're still in a look back period, and that's when

1:22:19.840 --> 1:22:23.360
<v Speaker 1>we started the lawsuit and we settled the lawsuit. I

1:22:23.400 --> 1:22:27.080
<v Speaker 1>sat down with Gates and we negotiated the final negotiation.

1:22:27.479 --> 1:22:29.920
<v Speaker 1>Some very senior people on both sides were involved, so

1:22:29.960 --> 1:22:32.160
<v Speaker 1>we ended up settling without going to court. Uh. We

1:22:32.360 --> 1:22:34.760
<v Speaker 1>we started in court, we didn't finish in court. Um

1:22:35.360 --> 1:22:36.920
<v Speaker 1>we Uh. We settled, you know, a year or two

1:22:36.960 --> 1:22:39.519
<v Speaker 1>into the lawsuit. Uh, and got a good outcome and

1:22:39.560 --> 1:22:46.240
<v Speaker 1>moved on. Okay, any Jim, you have the microphone? Okay? Hi? UM,

1:22:46.320 --> 1:22:48.800
<v Speaker 1>My name is Vicky Nahman and I actually worked at

1:22:48.880 --> 1:22:52.880
<v Speaker 1>music Net back in the day and uh, just as

1:22:52.880 --> 1:22:55.880
<v Speaker 1>side anecdote, one of the first meetings I had was

1:22:55.960 --> 1:22:59.320
<v Speaker 1>with Warner Music wanting to license US tracks at four

1:22:59.360 --> 1:23:02.360
<v Speaker 1>dollars and d five cents wholesale, and that that was

1:23:02.400 --> 1:23:04.160
<v Speaker 1>a yeah, that was a point where I thought, Okay,

1:23:04.200 --> 1:23:06.439
<v Speaker 1>this is going to take a while. UM. But my

1:23:06.520 --> 1:23:09.600
<v Speaker 1>question for you is is in there's a school of

1:23:09.640 --> 1:23:12.080
<v Speaker 1>thought that there's only one Apple, there's only one Google,

1:23:12.160 --> 1:23:16.519
<v Speaker 1>there's only one Facebook. UM. In music, do you what

1:23:16.560 --> 1:23:19.639
<v Speaker 1>are your thoughts about there's only one Spotify, there's only

1:23:19.680 --> 1:23:23.640
<v Speaker 1>one streaming service? Um. Right now we have a commoditization

1:23:23.720 --> 1:23:26.640
<v Speaker 1>of all of the catalogs and I'm just interested in

1:23:26.880 --> 1:23:31.120
<v Speaker 1>what your view is in in the landscape for music. Well,

1:23:31.520 --> 1:23:34.600
<v Speaker 1>I would say the following. Uh, Spotify has done an

1:23:34.600 --> 1:23:37.439
<v Speaker 1>incredible job and a huge respect for Daniel and folks

1:23:37.439 --> 1:23:40.280
<v Speaker 1>like Toroy with her yesterday, what they've done, they were

1:23:40.280 --> 1:23:42.759
<v Speaker 1>able to succeed in a particular context and maybe useful

1:23:42.760 --> 1:23:44.519
<v Speaker 1>for this group to explain that. I thought maybe Bob

1:23:44.520 --> 1:23:47.800
<v Speaker 1>would ask about this. Spotify I was able to get

1:23:47.840 --> 1:23:51.639
<v Speaker 1>to scale because they started in Europe for a very

1:23:51.680 --> 1:23:55.759
<v Speaker 1>particular reason. So we uh, we launched in the US

1:23:56.160 --> 1:23:58.280
<v Speaker 1>between US which was rapture at the time, Napster, a

1:23:58.280 --> 1:24:01.080
<v Speaker 1>few others, we had over a million subscribe verse. We

1:24:01.080 --> 1:24:03.000
<v Speaker 1>we did a teeny bit of every in Europe, but

1:24:03.040 --> 1:24:05.360
<v Speaker 1>not a much much. In the early days, Europe was

1:24:05.439 --> 1:24:08.160
<v Speaker 1>very expensive because you had a license, county, back country,

1:24:08.200 --> 1:24:10.519
<v Speaker 1>and of course every country has its own repertoire, where

1:24:10.560 --> 1:24:13.519
<v Speaker 1>sixtiescent of the repertoire in most countries is local language,

1:24:13.520 --> 1:24:15.760
<v Speaker 1>local culture. So it was much more expensive to launch

1:24:15.800 --> 1:24:19.240
<v Speaker 1>in Europe at the time that Spotify launched Europe. If

1:24:19.240 --> 1:24:22.040
<v Speaker 1>you guys had a million paid subscribers Europe, maybe at

1:24:22.040 --> 1:24:24.760
<v Speaker 1>a hundred thousand, it was tiny. So Spotify was able

1:24:24.800 --> 1:24:26.479
<v Speaker 1>to go to the majors and get a much more

1:24:26.520 --> 1:24:30.280
<v Speaker 1>flexible deal for their free to premium, for their freemu

1:24:30.360 --> 1:24:31.960
<v Speaker 1>offer than we could never get in the US. We

1:24:32.000 --> 1:24:34.200
<v Speaker 1>begged the labels for that deal. The best deal we

1:24:34.200 --> 1:24:35.840
<v Speaker 1>can get from the U S labels was what we

1:24:35.880 --> 1:24:38.840
<v Speaker 1>called rapswenty five, which was a non subscriber could listen

1:24:38.880 --> 1:24:40.760
<v Speaker 1>to twenty five streams a month and then we have

1:24:40.840 --> 1:24:43.160
<v Speaker 1>to pay. And that turned out maybe we were allows

1:24:43.200 --> 1:24:45.519
<v Speaker 1>you marketers, but I think that was much harder to

1:24:45.600 --> 1:24:48.719
<v Speaker 1>market than the than the than the Spotify pre product.

1:24:48.920 --> 1:24:51.479
<v Speaker 1>So Spotify launched and got two critical mass in Europe

1:24:51.960 --> 1:24:54.439
<v Speaker 1>with a free offer that was much much more robust

1:24:54.680 --> 1:24:56.920
<v Speaker 1>than any free offer that that we were able to

1:24:56.920 --> 1:24:59.080
<v Speaker 1>get the U S labels too right now. Then Spotify

1:24:59.120 --> 1:25:01.519
<v Speaker 1>came to the US and Spotify already had the momentum

1:25:01.520 --> 1:25:03.720
<v Speaker 1>of Europe and they basically said to the majors, we

1:25:03.760 --> 1:25:05.720
<v Speaker 1>want to do the same deal in the US, and

1:25:05.760 --> 1:25:07.679
<v Speaker 1>it took two years to get the deal done because

1:25:07.720 --> 1:25:10.559
<v Speaker 1>the major's kept saying no. Finally, Daniel raised a hundred

1:25:10.560 --> 1:25:13.160
<v Speaker 1>million dollars, basically paid it to the labels and he

1:25:13.280 --> 1:25:17.080
<v Speaker 1>got a pretty similar form of that deal. Good for him,

1:25:17.120 --> 1:25:20.440
<v Speaker 1>incredible for him. But that's a huge reason why Spotify

1:25:20.560 --> 1:25:24.360
<v Speaker 1>became the king of the industry was because it had

1:25:24.360 --> 1:25:26.559
<v Speaker 1>the bootstrap in Europe and by the time it got

1:25:26.640 --> 1:25:30.760
<v Speaker 1>into the US, it had the financial structure to raise

1:25:30.800 --> 1:25:33.559
<v Speaker 1>a hundred million dollars like a billion dollar valuation or something.

1:25:33.760 --> 1:25:36.280
<v Speaker 1>So as tempers in the company ended up, obviously, they've

1:25:36.280 --> 1:25:38.680
<v Speaker 1>they've created a lot of economic values since then. They

1:25:38.720 --> 1:25:40.479
<v Speaker 1>don't they know the cash flow yet, but they have

1:25:40.560 --> 1:25:44.959
<v Speaker 1>the economic value in terms of what happens next UH

1:25:45.160 --> 1:25:47.240
<v Speaker 1>visa to be Spotify and the labels. I think the

1:25:47.240 --> 1:25:50.479
<v Speaker 1>big question is what happens to the current day tont

1:25:50.600 --> 1:25:53.439
<v Speaker 1>right Spotify, it's been widely reported. I have no proprietary

1:25:53.439 --> 1:25:55.680
<v Speaker 1>information on this. Has contractually agreed they're not going to

1:25:55.720 --> 1:25:58.960
<v Speaker 1>be a labeled right, so they they can only go

1:25:59.080 --> 1:26:02.320
<v Speaker 1>so far. They can negotiate margins, try and get more profitability,

1:26:02.360 --> 1:26:05.120
<v Speaker 1>but at the end of the day, their their biggest

1:26:05.120 --> 1:26:08.000
<v Speaker 1>power as a distributor is to leverage that into being

1:26:08.000 --> 1:26:12.000
<v Speaker 1>a label. And how that plays out is to me,

1:26:12.160 --> 1:26:14.880
<v Speaker 1>the unwritten story of the next five years, which is

1:26:14.920 --> 1:26:19.080
<v Speaker 1>real Universal and Sony and and and Warner, which are

1:26:19.080 --> 1:26:21.439
<v Speaker 1>the three big labels and that control a huge amount

1:26:21.439 --> 1:26:26.360
<v Speaker 1>of catalog end up getting um uh, I don't know

1:26:26.360 --> 1:26:30.320
<v Speaker 1>what the right world would be uh squeezed by Spotify

1:26:30.640 --> 1:26:33.600
<v Speaker 1>needing to have more control of repertoire. Now Spotify has

1:26:33.600 --> 1:26:35.920
<v Speaker 1>tried to branch out video, trying to branch out of

1:26:36.000 --> 1:26:39.439
<v Speaker 1>Jason areas, but in so far Spotify stays an independent company.

1:26:39.760 --> 1:26:42.639
<v Speaker 1>They have to make a move like that somehow sometime

1:26:42.680 --> 1:26:45.800
<v Speaker 1>in the next five years, uh, or they're ultimately their

1:26:45.800 --> 1:26:48.280
<v Speaker 1>model is going to be compromised unless they sell to

1:26:48.320 --> 1:26:50.880
<v Speaker 1>somebody else. That's a massive scale. So you know, there's

1:26:50.920 --> 1:26:53.920
<v Speaker 1>all these things that haven't played out yet. If I

1:26:53.960 --> 1:26:55.599
<v Speaker 1>knew the answer to that question, I know the answer

1:26:55.640 --> 1:26:58.960
<v Speaker 1>to your question, which is what happens next? Right, you know,

1:26:58.960 --> 1:27:01.880
<v Speaker 1>you've got Spotify have any million change whatever numbatory I

1:27:01.920 --> 1:27:04.200
<v Speaker 1>told you yesterday, Apple at forty and change or whatever

1:27:04.200 --> 1:27:06.960
<v Speaker 1>their lettuce number is, uh, and then you know everybody

1:27:07.040 --> 1:27:09.080
<v Speaker 1>is much much lower than that. Amazon a sort of

1:27:09.080 --> 1:27:10.800
<v Speaker 1>a wild card because they have a hundred million prime

1:27:10.880 --> 1:27:14.639
<v Speaker 1>users and they've got a catalog, you know, mediocre product

1:27:14.680 --> 1:27:16.800
<v Speaker 1>for them, and then they've got a premium product that

1:27:16.840 --> 1:27:20.040
<v Speaker 1>has many, many fewer users, but it's it's very stratified.

1:27:20.640 --> 1:27:22.639
<v Speaker 1>And if I were a major, I would view that

1:27:22.880 --> 1:27:25.840
<v Speaker 1>as a very very dangerous, unstable place to be for

1:27:25.880 --> 1:27:27.400
<v Speaker 1>the reason that I just described. So if I was

1:27:27.439 --> 1:27:29.759
<v Speaker 1>a major, I'd be doing everything it could. It's ethnically

1:27:29.840 --> 1:27:31.960
<v Speaker 1>legal to make sure there are three or four other

1:27:32.040 --> 1:27:35.320
<v Speaker 1>scale competitors so that when Spotify comes to you for

1:27:35.400 --> 1:27:37.800
<v Speaker 1>the next renewal cycle and wants to jam, you wants

1:27:37.840 --> 1:27:39.160
<v Speaker 1>to get out of this, we can't be a labeled

1:27:39.160 --> 1:27:42.920
<v Speaker 1>through whatever. You'd have the ability to walk away. But

1:27:42.960 --> 1:27:45.200
<v Speaker 1>if there's a certain point, if Spotify is half of

1:27:45.240 --> 1:27:48.400
<v Speaker 1>the major's revenue, that's going to be unbelievably hard for

1:27:48.439 --> 1:27:50.160
<v Speaker 1>them to do. And we're getting to that point. I

1:27:50.160 --> 1:27:52.320
<v Speaker 1>don't know what the math is today, but Spotify is

1:27:52.320 --> 1:27:54.960
<v Speaker 1>obviously a majority there streaming revenue, and streaming is a

1:27:55.000 --> 1:27:57.280
<v Speaker 1>majority of their revenue, so it doesn't take to more

1:27:57.560 --> 1:27:59.960
<v Speaker 1>much for Spotify'd literally be a majority of their revenue

1:28:00.000 --> 1:28:02.400
<v Speaker 1>the whole, in which case the labels, you know, the

1:28:02.400 --> 1:28:04.559
<v Speaker 1>power Dinamic and shift. So if I were a label,

1:28:04.840 --> 1:28:06.880
<v Speaker 1>I would be trying to encourage as many people as

1:28:06.920 --> 1:28:09.880
<v Speaker 1>possible to create as much diversity as possible. We have

1:28:09.960 --> 1:28:13.920
<v Speaker 1>that conversation we meaning Napster with Sony, with Warner, with Universal.

1:28:14.280 --> 1:28:16.479
<v Speaker 1>They get it, but then there's a question of how

1:28:16.520 --> 1:28:21.680
<v Speaker 1>you activate it. Okay, Uh, but I'm aware of your

1:28:21.720 --> 1:28:26.320
<v Speaker 1>interest in what's happened and what happened in VSA V

1:28:26.479 --> 1:28:31.120
<v Speaker 1>Russia and uh their involvement in our elections. Uh looking

1:28:31.120 --> 1:28:35.920
<v Speaker 1>forward to what do you anticipate the things that uh

1:28:36.200 --> 1:28:38.240
<v Speaker 1>we ought to be, you know, looking out for an

1:28:38.280 --> 1:28:43.120
<v Speaker 1>anticipating vs V their chicanery. Uh well, I'll explain what

1:28:43.160 --> 1:28:45.080
<v Speaker 1>you what you said for the post. So in the

1:28:45.120 --> 1:28:48.080
<v Speaker 1>summer of sixteen, I started a website called putin Trump

1:28:48.120 --> 1:28:50.320
<v Speaker 1>dot org um. And it's not because I have a

1:28:50.360 --> 1:28:53.040
<v Speaker 1>crystal ball. Uh, It's because I was just pattern matching,

1:28:53.040 --> 1:28:55.360
<v Speaker 1>which is one of the things that I do right,

1:28:55.760 --> 1:28:57.280
<v Speaker 1>and it was clear to me that there was something

1:28:57.320 --> 1:29:01.559
<v Speaker 1>really weird happening when the Republican convence and soften in

1:29:01.600 --> 1:29:05.880
<v Speaker 1>their in their um, you know, in their uh, their platform,

1:29:06.120 --> 1:29:11.040
<v Speaker 1>they softened their program to be anti Ukraine and pro Russia,

1:29:11.360 --> 1:29:15.040
<v Speaker 1>whereas the Republican Party had been the hardercore ones, particularly

1:29:15.080 --> 1:29:17.880
<v Speaker 1>when Mitt Romney is running the hardercore anti Russia party.

1:29:17.880 --> 1:29:20.040
<v Speaker 1>So there was something weird going on there. There's all

1:29:20.040 --> 1:29:22.639
<v Speaker 1>this stuff about uh, you know, all of the uh,

1:29:23.120 --> 1:29:26.280
<v Speaker 1>the money laundering ish things that happened with high end

1:29:26.320 --> 1:29:29.320
<v Speaker 1>real estate and Trump that has been reported on UH.

1:29:29.360 --> 1:29:32.680
<v Speaker 1>And I didn't know anything about tapes of of of

1:29:32.800 --> 1:29:34.800
<v Speaker 1>random things that happened in Moscow, any of that stuff.

1:29:34.920 --> 1:29:36.800
<v Speaker 1>I didn't know anything about the I heard rumors about

1:29:36.880 --> 1:29:40.080
<v Speaker 1>the what what ended up, uh you know, uh being

1:29:40.120 --> 1:29:44.200
<v Speaker 1>the Steel Documents steal dossier in the fall of sixteen

1:29:44.240 --> 1:29:46.160
<v Speaker 1>after we launched the website, but I didn't anything about

1:29:46.160 --> 1:29:48.400
<v Speaker 1>it at the time we launched it. UM. But it

1:29:48.439 --> 1:29:50.360
<v Speaker 1>was clear that there was something weird going on here,

1:29:50.560 --> 1:29:51.960
<v Speaker 1>and I wanted to just shine a light on it.

1:29:52.000 --> 1:29:54.720
<v Speaker 1>So we created a website. UH didn't put a huge

1:29:54.720 --> 1:29:57.160
<v Speaker 1>amount of money behind it, but publicized it a bit,

1:29:57.439 --> 1:29:59.200
<v Speaker 1>got some attention for it. But at the end of

1:29:59.200 --> 1:30:02.479
<v Speaker 1>the day, UH, there were so many other massive trends

1:30:02.680 --> 1:30:06.240
<v Speaker 1>that were driving the election of Trump over Hillary. Looking

1:30:06.280 --> 1:30:09.320
<v Speaker 1>to do thousand eighteen, there's no question in my mind

1:30:09.800 --> 1:30:13.360
<v Speaker 1>that there is going to be a lot of of

1:30:13.360 --> 1:30:20.600
<v Speaker 1>of effort by the Russian government to influence the elections

1:30:20.920 --> 1:30:24.879
<v Speaker 1>where they can. They're gonna have one disadvantage relative to sixteen,

1:30:25.160 --> 1:30:28.040
<v Speaker 1>which is there's not you can't write the same national,

1:30:28.600 --> 1:30:32.080
<v Speaker 1>national fake news and fake social media postings that you

1:30:32.120 --> 1:30:35.400
<v Speaker 1>couldn't do thousand sixteen. A because hopefully the facebooks and

1:30:35.400 --> 1:30:37.519
<v Speaker 1>the twitters of the World War vigilant and be because

1:30:37.560 --> 1:30:40.320
<v Speaker 1>it won't be one national issue. What what wins that

1:30:40.400 --> 1:30:43.800
<v Speaker 1>swing state congressional district in Ohio will be specific to

1:30:43.800 --> 1:30:46.200
<v Speaker 1>two Ohio candidates. The most of us have ever heard

1:30:46.200 --> 1:30:48.439
<v Speaker 1>of the same thing, So it'll be district by district.

1:30:48.720 --> 1:30:52.440
<v Speaker 1>But I do think that who wins Congress in ten

1:30:52.760 --> 1:30:55.439
<v Speaker 1>is the binary issue for the next two years. You know,

1:30:55.520 --> 1:30:58.759
<v Speaker 1>if Democrats win control of the House representatives, they're gonna

1:30:58.760 --> 1:31:03.879
<v Speaker 1>be robust UH hearings. UH there's gonna be a robust process,

1:31:03.960 --> 1:31:08.400
<v Speaker 1>and I think it's highly likely than Trump will be impeached. Now,

1:31:08.439 --> 1:31:12.240
<v Speaker 1>the Democrats are afraid to say that because they don't properly.

1:31:12.320 --> 1:31:13.880
<v Speaker 1>I think they don't want to make it sound like

1:31:13.920 --> 1:31:15.920
<v Speaker 1>they're not going to be data driven. I say that

1:31:15.960 --> 1:31:18.559
<v Speaker 1>because I think that what the data would expose between

1:31:18.600 --> 1:31:22.040
<v Speaker 1>the Muller axis UM and the uh, you know, the

1:31:22.560 --> 1:31:25.280
<v Speaker 1>Michael Cohen sleazy stuff and who knows what else, is

1:31:25.320 --> 1:31:28.639
<v Speaker 1>that Trump has committed a series of acts that are

1:31:28.760 --> 1:31:31.680
<v Speaker 1>impeachable offenses. But we have we don't have all the

1:31:31.720 --> 1:31:33.840
<v Speaker 1>data yet, we only we have certain things that are

1:31:34.640 --> 1:31:36.920
<v Speaker 1>suggestive of that. But I think when we get the data,

1:31:36.960 --> 1:31:39.560
<v Speaker 1>we'll see what happens. My personal belief is when we

1:31:39.600 --> 1:31:42.080
<v Speaker 1>get the data, it will demonstrate the need to impeach him,

1:31:42.280 --> 1:31:44.599
<v Speaker 1>and that that should then happen. Then there's no question

1:31:44.600 --> 1:31:46.759
<v Speaker 1>would be what happens in the Senate and does Trump

1:31:47.640 --> 1:31:50.599
<v Speaker 1>cave then or does he stay in fight. Different people

1:31:50.600 --> 1:31:52.600
<v Speaker 1>of different views of that. I don't think it's a

1:31:52.600 --> 1:31:56.599
<v Speaker 1>foreker conclusion either way. If you study seventy three seventy four, UM,

1:31:56.760 --> 1:31:59.280
<v Speaker 1>you know it was the smoking gun tapes that ultimately

1:31:59.360 --> 1:32:03.160
<v Speaker 1>cause Republic in the Senate to flip and made Nixon resigned. Whereas,

1:32:03.200 --> 1:32:08.360
<v Speaker 1>of course in in in nine with the Lewinsky stuff, Uh,

1:32:08.479 --> 1:32:11.160
<v Speaker 1>it was an idea stuff. It was clear that Clinton

1:32:11.160 --> 1:32:15.960
<v Speaker 1>had perjured himself over a blowjob, which was wrong. I

1:32:15.960 --> 1:32:18.240
<v Speaker 1>think you can have an interesting debate about whether that's

1:32:18.240 --> 1:32:20.040
<v Speaker 1>an apeche of offense or not. But I don't. I

1:32:20.040 --> 1:32:22.760
<v Speaker 1>think the Democrats didn't feel under political pressure to call

1:32:22.800 --> 1:32:25.320
<v Speaker 1>it in a petual offense, and therefore he finished his

1:32:25.400 --> 1:32:27.240
<v Speaker 1>termat So I don't know how it's going to go

1:32:27.600 --> 1:32:29.720
<v Speaker 1>beyond that, but I think the eighteen election will be

1:32:29.800 --> 1:32:32.559
<v Speaker 1>the uh, you know, the limit. If the Democrats don't

1:32:32.560 --> 1:32:34.280
<v Speaker 1>win the House an eighteen, we'll just have two more

1:32:34.360 --> 1:32:36.160
<v Speaker 1>years like the last two years, the less year and

1:32:36.160 --> 1:32:40.479
<v Speaker 1>a half. Okay. I have another political minded question, and

1:32:40.520 --> 1:32:45.040
<v Speaker 1>that's if there if the right has uh media and

1:32:45.080 --> 1:32:47.120
<v Speaker 1>they have media scale with Fox News, and then they

1:32:47.200 --> 1:32:49.800
<v Speaker 1>have the biggest you know, tweeter of all time that's

1:32:49.840 --> 1:32:54.720
<v Speaker 1>really dominating the headlines. Based on your experience with Air America, Um,

1:32:55.320 --> 1:32:58.400
<v Speaker 1>what can the left do to create a media engine,

1:32:58.520 --> 1:33:03.040
<v Speaker 1>communications strategy move forward that can rival what the right

1:33:03.200 --> 1:33:06.599
<v Speaker 1>is doing at scale and to communicate what the demos

1:33:06.600 --> 1:33:10.120
<v Speaker 1>about or what the left represents. And then also how

1:33:10.200 --> 1:33:13.080
<v Speaker 1>does that intersect with technology? Is it like what the

1:33:13.160 --> 1:33:15.800
<v Speaker 1>crooked media guys are doing, but just at scale. And

1:33:16.160 --> 1:33:17.720
<v Speaker 1>if you were to say I'm gonna I'm gonna launch

1:33:17.720 --> 1:33:21.760
<v Speaker 1>you America for what would that company look like and

1:33:22.000 --> 1:33:26.439
<v Speaker 1>what would that communication strategy be? Well, UM, I have

1:33:26.600 --> 1:33:30.680
<v Speaker 1>thought about conceptually, but not operationally, what it would be. UM.

1:33:31.080 --> 1:33:33.760
<v Speaker 1>I think it actually if you look at the fact

1:33:33.840 --> 1:33:38.080
<v Speaker 1>that Trump's popularity is still below UM, I think it's

1:33:38.120 --> 1:33:43.599
<v Speaker 1>all about marshaling electoral critical mass from people who want

1:33:43.640 --> 1:33:45.560
<v Speaker 1>our country to work where it's supposed to work. So

1:33:45.640 --> 1:33:47.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't think the right thing to do is to

1:33:48.200 --> 1:33:55.400
<v Speaker 1>fight UM their boisterous UH propaganda and UH name calling

1:33:55.640 --> 1:33:58.600
<v Speaker 1>and frequently lies with the same. I think the right

1:33:58.640 --> 1:34:01.599
<v Speaker 1>thing to do is to appeal to anybody that thinks

1:34:01.680 --> 1:34:05.760
<v Speaker 1>that our democracy is too important to allow truths to

1:34:05.840 --> 1:34:09.400
<v Speaker 1>become a subjective thing, that our societal cohesion is too

1:34:09.439 --> 1:34:14.000
<v Speaker 1>important to allow uh facts to be irrelevant. And if

1:34:14.080 --> 1:34:16.160
<v Speaker 1>you just say, look, this is just about what the

1:34:16.240 --> 1:34:19.680
<v Speaker 1>facts are, right, you know, climate change, there's there's an

1:34:19.840 --> 1:34:24.040
<v Speaker 1>incoutabal scientific consensus around this. That's a fact. Um. The

1:34:24.840 --> 1:34:27.160
<v Speaker 1>the data on what weather is happening. That's a fact.

1:34:27.439 --> 1:34:29.720
<v Speaker 1>And yes, it's unfortunate for people in the abstract, in

1:34:29.760 --> 1:34:32.559
<v Speaker 1>the extractive industries that those facts are there, but those

1:34:32.560 --> 1:34:35.479
<v Speaker 1>are facts. So I think if we just literally um

1:34:35.720 --> 1:34:41.000
<v Speaker 1>stick to the facts and being unyielding about raising those

1:34:41.080 --> 1:34:43.439
<v Speaker 1>facts in the space, in the face of name calling,

1:34:43.800 --> 1:34:45.920
<v Speaker 1>in the face of about hominem attacks, in the face

1:34:45.960 --> 1:34:48.479
<v Speaker 1>of whatever else, I think that's the greatest chance to

1:34:49.000 --> 1:34:54.720
<v Speaker 1>restore some balance to the political discourse and to the

1:34:54.920 --> 1:34:57.840
<v Speaker 1>text and balances. I mean the big tragedy of TWI

1:34:58.000 --> 1:35:01.040
<v Speaker 1>sixteen West and just Trump's election, but the fact that

1:35:01.520 --> 1:35:03.360
<v Speaker 1>one of the one of the other branches of government's

1:35:03.400 --> 1:35:06.720
<v Speaker 1>supposed to be a check and balance has completely abdicated

1:35:06.760 --> 1:35:10.719
<v Speaker 1>that responsibility. And it's advocate the responsibility because the politics

1:35:10.920 --> 1:35:13.800
<v Speaker 1>for the for Republicans are that they feel like if

1:35:13.840 --> 1:35:16.400
<v Speaker 1>they don't, they'll get primary and they'll lose, and if

1:35:16.439 --> 1:35:19.360
<v Speaker 1>they do, they'll get to keep playing ball. So that's

1:35:19.479 --> 1:35:22.280
<v Speaker 1>it's unfortunate that that that is the dynamic we have.

1:35:22.840 --> 1:35:25.519
<v Speaker 1>But the only solution to that dynamic is to is

1:35:25.560 --> 1:35:29.280
<v Speaker 1>to not have them being the have the levels of power.

1:35:29.600 --> 1:35:31.519
<v Speaker 1>And to do that we've got to persuade a lot

1:35:31.560 --> 1:35:34.000
<v Speaker 1>of independence that that change has to happen. And if

1:35:34.040 --> 1:35:46.160
<v Speaker 1>we do that, then I think that will build on itself. Okay, rights,

1:35:46.200 --> 1:35:51.840
<v Speaker 1>The question was about music and VR. Um. I am

1:35:53.240 --> 1:35:58.920
<v Speaker 1>mediu embarrassed on VR because the ergonomics of using a

1:35:59.040 --> 1:36:03.960
<v Speaker 1>VR headset and an experience are not Uh. It's so

1:36:04.160 --> 1:36:08.040
<v Speaker 1>immersive that it is not doesn't fit in a wide

1:36:08.120 --> 1:36:11.160
<v Speaker 1>enough swatch of life. Everyone got excited about three D

1:36:11.800 --> 1:36:13.880
<v Speaker 1>because you could go to watch James Cameron movie in

1:36:13.880 --> 1:36:16.920
<v Speaker 1>a movie theater, but that's an intended immersive experience where

1:36:16.960 --> 1:36:19.799
<v Speaker 1>for two hours you're focusing on you're going to a location,

1:36:19.880 --> 1:36:24.080
<v Speaker 1>you're watching it home. Three D didn't work because people

1:36:24.160 --> 1:36:26.519
<v Speaker 1>don't watch glass put glasses on to watch movies at

1:36:26.560 --> 1:36:30.519
<v Speaker 1>home because they're watching in such a range of different ways. So,

1:36:31.160 --> 1:36:33.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, and lets until you have the equivalent of

1:36:33.320 --> 1:36:36.880
<v Speaker 1>direct view VR. Uh, I think it's going to be

1:36:37.000 --> 1:36:40.640
<v Speaker 1>a more of a niche thing, uh than than people realize.

1:36:40.680 --> 1:36:44.519
<v Speaker 1>So do I think that? Um? Uh? There are ways

1:36:44.560 --> 1:36:49.840
<v Speaker 1>to do much more immersive experiences with live music shows. Absolutely,

1:36:49.920 --> 1:36:52.080
<v Speaker 1>and you know there's a there's there's lots of different

1:36:52.479 --> 1:36:55.080
<v Speaker 1>uh techniques for doing that. Do I think people are

1:36:55.080 --> 1:36:58.760
<v Speaker 1>gonna put VR headsets on to watch concerts. It makes

1:36:58.800 --> 1:37:01.720
<v Speaker 1>for a great demo. But know, the headset fatigue thing

1:37:01.800 --> 1:37:05.640
<v Speaker 1>is a real phenomenon, and uh, you know, the the

1:37:05.840 --> 1:37:09.879
<v Speaker 1>ergonomics of using these devices have to be uh compelling.

1:37:10.520 --> 1:37:13.639
<v Speaker 1>Uh and uh you know I I one of one

1:37:13.680 --> 1:37:16.639
<v Speaker 1>of the Angel investments that I've done that I'm proudest

1:37:16.800 --> 1:37:18.639
<v Speaker 1>in the last couple of years is a company called

1:37:18.680 --> 1:37:22.600
<v Speaker 1>Control Labs, which Stephen Lee wrote the nice write up

1:37:22.640 --> 1:37:24.960
<v Speaker 1>of in Wired magazine to bringian kind of Thomas Weird,

1:37:25.000 --> 1:37:27.200
<v Speaker 1>who I've known for for many years, and his his

1:37:27.400 --> 1:37:33.080
<v Speaker 1>his band of of neurobiologists, and they've created a technology

1:37:33.240 --> 1:37:36.040
<v Speaker 1>letch of an arm band that you basically think of

1:37:36.080 --> 1:37:39.080
<v Speaker 1>it as like an Apple Watch or a you know,

1:37:39.280 --> 1:37:41.760
<v Speaker 1>a next generation fitbit where the Apple where the band

1:37:41.840 --> 1:37:46.880
<v Speaker 1>can can literally detect individual electron signals, uh, neurological signals

1:37:47.200 --> 1:37:49.800
<v Speaker 1>from your brain to your fingers, so you it can

1:37:49.880 --> 1:37:52.360
<v Speaker 1>tell what you're doing here with your individual fingers with

1:37:52.680 --> 1:37:55.479
<v Speaker 1>a band that sits under wrist something like that, where

1:37:55.520 --> 1:37:57.360
<v Speaker 1>the technology is not in base, you don't have to

1:37:57.400 --> 1:37:59.360
<v Speaker 1>wear a big data glove. I think it's going a

1:37:59.439 --> 1:38:02.400
<v Speaker 1>huge import for the input side of all this this

1:38:02.640 --> 1:38:04.720
<v Speaker 1>a r VR staff and we need the equivalent of

1:38:04.720 --> 1:38:06.559
<v Speaker 1>the output side of that where you can get an

1:38:06.560 --> 1:38:09.840
<v Speaker 1>immersive experience without having to wear an immersive headset. And

1:38:09.960 --> 1:38:12.920
<v Speaker 1>I think I think the a R plus path is

1:38:12.960 --> 1:38:14.920
<v Speaker 1>probably a better path for achieving that in my view

1:38:15.280 --> 1:38:17.960
<v Speaker 1>than the than the immersive headset experience, which make for

1:38:18.000 --> 1:38:21.120
<v Speaker 1>incredible demos, but I don't think people really want to

1:38:21.160 --> 1:38:24.240
<v Speaker 1>be in those. Thank gear for that long. Okay, let

1:38:24.280 --> 1:38:25.840
<v Speaker 1>that be a lesson. You don't have to be limited

1:38:25.880 --> 1:38:29.959
<v Speaker 1>to one vertical Rob as we've owned the Pro Bowlers

1:38:30.040 --> 1:38:34.640
<v Speaker 1>tour is involved in music, technology and politics. Thanks so

1:38:34.800 --> 1:38:37.439
<v Speaker 1>much for being here and sharing your ideas of the audiences.

1:38:43.600 --> 1:38:46.080
<v Speaker 1>That wraps up this week's episode of the Bob left

1:38:46.080 --> 1:38:49.080
<v Speaker 1>Sets podcast, recorded live at the Music Media Summit in

1:38:49.120 --> 1:38:52.840
<v Speaker 1>Santa Barbara, California and produced by tune In. I hope

1:38:52.880 --> 1:38:55.760
<v Speaker 1>you enjoyed this conversation with CEO of Real Networks, Rob

1:38:55.800 --> 1:38:58.800
<v Speaker 1>Glazer and his interactions with Asia and his history with

1:38:58.920 --> 1:39:01.800
<v Speaker 1>Bill Gates and micro us off. What did you think

1:39:01.840 --> 1:39:04.400
<v Speaker 1>of the interview? Emailed me at Bob at left Sex

1:39:04.479 --> 1:39:13.080
<v Speaker 1>dot com. Until next time, I'm Bob left Sex. Can

1:39:13.479 --> 1:39:22.040
<v Speaker 1>think of and me reas don't know exactly why must

1:39:22.200 --> 1:39:25.000
<v Speaker 1>be its out of theseas