WEBVTT - MLB: Leading Off August 19th, 2022 (Ep. 578)

0:00:15.160 --> 0:00:17.959
<v Speaker 1>Leading off starts right now, right here in Fantasy Pros,

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:20.520
<v Speaker 1>brought to you by bet MGM. It's the Chris and

0:00:20.600 --> 0:00:22.720
<v Speaker 1>Chris Show. I am Chris Welsh over there. That is

0:00:22.840 --> 0:00:26.279
<v Speaker 1>Chris Clegg on Twitter at roto Clegg Cleig. What's up, buddy.

0:00:26.320 --> 0:00:28.160
<v Speaker 1>I can't say Chris or we'll get all tied up.

0:00:28.200 --> 0:00:31.640
<v Speaker 2>And yeah, too many Chris is in the fantasy baseball space, man,

0:00:31.680 --> 0:00:33.879
<v Speaker 2>so we gotta go by last names. But yeah, I'm

0:00:33.880 --> 0:00:35.519
<v Speaker 2>glad to be back, looking forward to the show. It's

0:00:35.560 --> 0:00:37.640
<v Speaker 2>always good to chat with you, and looking forward to

0:00:37.640 --> 0:00:39.879
<v Speaker 2>breaking down everything from yesterday.

0:00:40.200 --> 0:00:41.919
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well except for the top news. We'll break down

0:00:41.960 --> 0:00:44.320
<v Speaker 1>how many What do you think the most common name

0:00:44.640 --> 0:00:47.360
<v Speaker 1>is in fantasy baseball for an analyst? Do you think

0:00:47.400 --> 0:00:49.239
<v Speaker 1>it's Chris? Do you think I'm trying to think of?

0:00:49.360 --> 0:00:52.360
<v Speaker 1>Is it? We don't know a lot of palls. There's

0:00:52.560 --> 0:00:55.480
<v Speaker 1>not that many erics we'd have to let's let's break

0:00:55.480 --> 0:00:57.720
<v Speaker 1>that down. That's the next stat we need everybody the

0:00:57.760 --> 0:01:00.240
<v Speaker 1>most common name. Maybe it is Chris. I don't I

0:01:00.240 --> 0:01:04.200
<v Speaker 1>guess in the prospect world we have me you Chris Blessings,

0:01:04.280 --> 0:01:06.520
<v Speaker 1>So maybe Chris does dominate the prospect world. I don't

0:01:06.560 --> 0:01:08.560
<v Speaker 1>know about the fantasy world, so yes, things will be

0:01:08.600 --> 0:01:12.280
<v Speaker 1>fun to talk about, except probably the top main story

0:01:12.280 --> 0:01:16.199
<v Speaker 1>that just came down, I believe within the last hour praise.

0:01:16.240 --> 0:01:20.720
<v Speaker 1>Marcelo Zuna was arrested on Friday morning, yes, in Georgia

0:01:20.800 --> 0:01:24.240
<v Speaker 1>for driving under the influence. Every time I read this,

0:01:24.360 --> 0:01:26.240
<v Speaker 1>it says nor Cross, but I want to say it's

0:01:26.240 --> 0:01:27.880
<v Speaker 1>like Narcos, so then I'm like, wow, this is a

0:01:27.959 --> 0:01:31.800
<v Speaker 1>much serious injury is an issue. Nor Cross police arrested

0:01:31.800 --> 0:01:36.199
<v Speaker 1>Ozuna after failing to maintain his lane. He was booked

0:01:36.200 --> 0:01:39.319
<v Speaker 1>in around uh four thirty in the morning. That's good

0:01:39.400 --> 0:01:43.560
<v Speaker 1>for game time. And as you know, Ozuna is I believe,

0:01:44.480 --> 0:01:47.360
<v Speaker 1>not even a year out of his domestic violence issue

0:01:47.400 --> 0:01:52.080
<v Speaker 1>that he had. There's no actual other information outside of

0:01:52.880 --> 0:01:57.880
<v Speaker 1>he messed up, and I would not expecting to probably

0:01:57.920 --> 0:01:59.480
<v Speaker 1>see a whole bunch of Oza. I mean, maybe I'm

0:01:59.520 --> 0:02:02.280
<v Speaker 1>overblowing it because it's the DUI, but it's two main issues.

0:02:02.280 --> 0:02:06.160
<v Speaker 1>He was arrested. Marcello Zuna probably gonna at least miss

0:02:06.160 --> 0:02:08.920
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of time, if not maybe major you know.

0:02:08.960 --> 0:02:12.880
<v Speaker 1>Reactions from the Braves cleg Yeah, I mean, I'm hoping

0:02:12.880 --> 0:02:15.120
<v Speaker 1>they can find a way to avoid this contract after

0:02:15.480 --> 0:02:18.440
<v Speaker 1>you both incidentss. I don't know, you know, legally how

0:02:18.639 --> 0:02:22.400
<v Speaker 1>that works, and if you know his parole stuff, there

0:02:22.480 --> 0:02:25.080
<v Speaker 1>was some clauses in there about anything like this. But

0:02:25.440 --> 0:02:27.639
<v Speaker 1>you know, he had already kind of lost his starting

0:02:27.639 --> 0:02:31.080
<v Speaker 1>spot at this point where he was just playing really inconsistently.

0:02:31.600 --> 0:02:33.639
<v Speaker 1>He's been bumped out of the order, bumped down the order,

0:02:33.680 --> 0:02:37.360
<v Speaker 1>and then completely out and this certainly doesn't help his case.

0:02:37.440 --> 0:02:39.360
<v Speaker 1>You know, if he's wanting to, you know, bump up

0:02:39.360 --> 0:02:41.720
<v Speaker 1>that two fourteen bag average he has going on, I

0:02:41.840 --> 0:02:44.120
<v Speaker 1>don't think this is the way to do that. So

0:02:44.120 --> 0:02:46.320
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't be surprised, if you know, even if the

0:02:46.360 --> 0:02:48.640
<v Speaker 1>Braves have to eat the money if he gets DFA.

0:02:48.919 --> 0:02:50.840
<v Speaker 3>So it could be interesting, but I don't think we'll

0:02:50.840 --> 0:02:51.680
<v Speaker 3>see it much anymore.

0:02:52.280 --> 0:02:54.880
<v Speaker 1>No, And one of the big things that Wonky pointed

0:02:54.880 --> 0:02:57.960
<v Speaker 1>out this is where this was leading to. We have

0:02:58.040 --> 0:03:01.840
<v Speaker 1>to consider with how good Vong Grissom has been, that

0:03:02.080 --> 0:03:06.520
<v Speaker 1>this could be the playing time that opens up. Obviously,

0:03:06.560 --> 0:03:09.480
<v Speaker 1>Marcel Azuna, you know you're gonna have outfield, You're gonna

0:03:09.480 --> 0:03:14.240
<v Speaker 1>have potential DH but if Ozuna is out in perpetuity,

0:03:14.720 --> 0:03:18.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean Grissom just was given a spot. There's just

0:03:18.240 --> 0:03:21.839
<v Speaker 1>given an open field here with whatever happens. I mean,

0:03:22.840 --> 0:03:26.120
<v Speaker 1>Orlando Arcia comes back, okay, if Alvis comes back in

0:03:26.200 --> 0:03:28.520
<v Speaker 1>time and both of them okay, But now this is

0:03:28.520 --> 0:03:31.120
<v Speaker 1>another potential spot that they could maybe play Grissom if

0:03:31.120 --> 0:03:33.760
<v Speaker 1>they want to run some outfield, DH have him there,

0:03:34.120 --> 0:03:38.160
<v Speaker 1>and his success is probably one of those reasons. I mean,

0:03:38.160 --> 0:03:40.440
<v Speaker 1>sometimes these teams get caught. They get caught with like,

0:03:40.440 --> 0:03:42.400
<v Speaker 1>all right, this is a talented player, we need this

0:03:42.440 --> 0:03:44.880
<v Speaker 1>person versus the actions of what they had. Not all

0:03:44.920 --> 0:03:48.720
<v Speaker 1>teams react correctly, but when you have really other good

0:03:48.720 --> 0:03:50.600
<v Speaker 1>players that are sitting in the wings and this could

0:03:50.680 --> 0:03:54.120
<v Speaker 1>just create rest of season opportunity, it's even better for Grissom.

0:03:54.880 --> 0:03:58.760
<v Speaker 1>Not that there's any application Craig Clegg, because he's already

0:03:58.800 --> 0:04:02.119
<v Speaker 1>picked up everywhere. If Grissom was not picked up, anywhere

0:04:02.440 --> 0:04:06.360
<v Speaker 1>you should run is immediately immediately to go pick him up.

0:04:06.800 --> 0:04:10.320
<v Speaker 1>But he's not anywhere most likely available. So I don't

0:04:10.320 --> 0:04:12.120
<v Speaker 1>know what the actual item is that just if anybody

0:04:12.120 --> 0:04:14.440
<v Speaker 1>owns Grisom, you can probably feel a whole lot better

0:04:14.480 --> 0:04:14.880
<v Speaker 1>about it.

0:04:15.440 --> 0:04:16.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think so.

0:04:16.200 --> 0:04:19.080
<v Speaker 2>And I would also say William Contreras sees more at bats.

0:04:19.080 --> 0:04:22.200
<v Speaker 2>I mean, you know he's dhing some, but you know,

0:04:22.360 --> 0:04:24.560
<v Speaker 2>when he's not catching, he may be the everyday DH

0:04:24.760 --> 0:04:28.960
<v Speaker 2>at least until Alb's is back and Grisom moves off second.

0:04:29.120 --> 0:04:32.039
<v Speaker 2>So I really think it's a bump for William Contreras.

0:04:32.480 --> 0:04:36.600
<v Speaker 2>So he's already been that well, you know will Contraras.

0:04:36.839 --> 0:04:39.159
<v Speaker 1>What's interesting about him is he's one of those guys

0:04:39.200 --> 0:04:41.920
<v Speaker 1>that I'm trying to think of how many are out there,

0:04:41.960 --> 0:04:46.400
<v Speaker 1>but like he doesn't have a full time gig yet

0:04:46.440 --> 0:04:49.040
<v Speaker 1>he has been a top ten at his position for

0:04:49.080 --> 0:04:52.000
<v Speaker 1>me for half of the season with the performance, regardless

0:04:52.040 --> 0:04:54.279
<v Speaker 1>of having the full time gig or not, his bat

0:04:54.279 --> 0:04:57.440
<v Speaker 1>has been so live that without the full full time

0:04:57.520 --> 0:04:59.640
<v Speaker 1>they've still been attempting to give it to him. And

0:04:59.640 --> 0:05:01.400
<v Speaker 1>you're right, this does open up a little bit more

0:05:01.440 --> 0:05:04.120
<v Speaker 1>of an opportunity for him. So you know, maybe that's

0:05:04.120 --> 0:05:06.000
<v Speaker 1>how to look at it. Maybe the big arrow actually

0:05:06.120 --> 0:05:10.520
<v Speaker 1>is Contraross with a side arrow of von Grissom, because

0:05:10.520 --> 0:05:13.760
<v Speaker 1>they're still scenarios you're building where it might not work

0:05:13.920 --> 0:05:18.520
<v Speaker 1>if wilmcntras is the main DH, and then you do

0:05:18.600 --> 0:05:21.120
<v Speaker 1>have Albi's coming back and Grissom is still kind of

0:05:21.120 --> 0:05:23.240
<v Speaker 1>without a spot or a landing spot. If they don't

0:05:23.240 --> 0:05:25.280
<v Speaker 1>want to move him around, then it may be moot.

0:05:25.440 --> 0:05:29.200
<v Speaker 1>But Grislam has been awesome. Ozuna not so awesome, not

0:05:29.320 --> 0:05:34.799
<v Speaker 1>so awesome whatsoever. Zach Gallon is awesome though striking out twelve,

0:05:34.880 --> 0:05:36.680
<v Speaker 1>I think it was someone right at the top here.

0:05:36.880 --> 0:05:40.320
<v Speaker 1>One of the very first comments in Angelo Gallon thirty

0:05:40.320 --> 0:05:46.159
<v Speaker 1>five Fantasy points yesterday been phenomenal, twelve strikeouts, had seventeen

0:05:46.520 --> 0:05:49.080
<v Speaker 1>swing and missus led the way against the Giants last night.

0:05:49.080 --> 0:05:51.960
<v Speaker 1>And I'm looking at some of his stat cast stuff

0:05:52.000 --> 0:05:56.039
<v Speaker 1>as well. He had a sixty seven percent swing, a

0:05:56.040 --> 0:05:59.320
<v Speaker 1>whiff rate sixty seven percent with rate on his curb,

0:05:59.360 --> 0:06:01.520
<v Speaker 1>his knuckle cur which he threw twenty six percent of

0:06:01.600 --> 0:06:05.040
<v Speaker 1>the time. Fifteen of the twenty six elicited to swing.

0:06:05.600 --> 0:06:09.839
<v Speaker 1>Ten of those fifteen were whiffs, which is a bonkers number.

0:06:10.200 --> 0:06:12.360
<v Speaker 1>And he had whiffs. He had a double digit or

0:06:12.440 --> 0:06:15.120
<v Speaker 1>multiple whiffs on every single pitch he threw last night.

0:06:15.279 --> 0:06:20.599
<v Speaker 1>Four of the categorized pitches with at least double digit usage.

0:06:20.880 --> 0:06:24.480
<v Speaker 1>Zach Gallen has been a monster cleg and really is

0:06:24.520 --> 0:06:26.920
<v Speaker 1>one of those guys. If it continues on the bad team.

0:06:26.960 --> 0:06:29.280
<v Speaker 1>He is going to vault himself up as far as

0:06:29.320 --> 0:06:33.280
<v Speaker 1>how he's valued next season exponentially if this keeps going on.

0:06:34.200 --> 0:06:36.159
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and I think he hasn't been talked about in

0:06:36.200 --> 0:06:37.720
<v Speaker 2>the light that he should be with the type of

0:06:37.800 --> 0:06:39.919
<v Speaker 2>season that he's having. You know, he's right at a

0:06:39.920 --> 0:06:42.279
<v Speaker 2>strikeout in ninny right now. But you know, when you

0:06:42.320 --> 0:06:44.120
<v Speaker 2>look at it, he's been striking out more as of

0:06:44.160 --> 0:06:47.440
<v Speaker 2>recent and that's been encouraging to really see him, you know,

0:06:47.440 --> 0:06:50.120
<v Speaker 2>getting to those strikeouts, and obviously you know, this last

0:06:50.120 --> 0:06:52.720
<v Speaker 2>start was his most strikeouts that he's had this season.

0:06:52.800 --> 0:06:56.480
<v Speaker 2>So if this trend continues, then I certainly think he's

0:06:56.480 --> 0:06:59.720
<v Speaker 2>going to push his way up boards for redraft next year.

0:07:00.279 --> 0:07:02.960
<v Speaker 2>But I still think he's being a bit undervalued. This

0:07:03.000 --> 0:07:05.559
<v Speaker 2>is kind of who we expected him to be, really

0:07:05.600 --> 0:07:08.520
<v Speaker 2>when he came up his rookie season and just dominated,

0:07:08.560 --> 0:07:10.840
<v Speaker 2>and then last year just didn't really go as planned.

0:07:11.240 --> 0:07:14.000
<v Speaker 2>But now he's back and just absolutely dominant. So I

0:07:14.040 --> 0:07:17.160
<v Speaker 2>think we can kind of expect Gallon to be this

0:07:17.360 --> 0:07:21.320
<v Speaker 2>low threes type era with a solid strikeout rate, not

0:07:21.400 --> 0:07:23.760
<v Speaker 2>the best, not elite. It's not gonna push himself into

0:07:23.800 --> 0:07:26.600
<v Speaker 2>ACE territory, but you know, you have to really like

0:07:26.600 --> 0:07:28.880
<v Speaker 2>what you're getting out of Gallon, especially where he drafted

0:07:28.920 --> 0:07:29.480
<v Speaker 2>him this season.

0:07:29.640 --> 0:07:32.840
<v Speaker 1>We're kind of getting into like twenty twenty three talk

0:07:33.040 --> 0:07:36.040
<v Speaker 1>territory Bubba who had on yesterday and was talking about

0:07:36.360 --> 0:07:40.600
<v Speaker 1>how him and Bloom we're sharing some twenty twenty two

0:07:40.760 --> 0:07:42.400
<v Speaker 1>I think it was like a best ball or whatever

0:07:42.400 --> 0:07:44.800
<v Speaker 1>they were doing for the next year. So you're gonna

0:07:44.800 --> 0:07:47.200
<v Speaker 1>start getting into that territory where ranks are going to

0:07:47.240 --> 0:07:49.600
<v Speaker 1>be floating out there. My next rank update, I'm not

0:07:49.640 --> 0:07:52.680
<v Speaker 1>going to do a September redraft rank update because I

0:07:52.720 --> 0:07:54.600
<v Speaker 1>just kind of think that's silly with the final month.

0:07:54.720 --> 0:07:57.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm actually going to focus on early twenty twenty three ranks,

0:07:57.440 --> 0:07:59.679
<v Speaker 1>So that's going to be my September of what I release.

0:08:00.200 --> 0:08:04.920
<v Speaker 1>And do you think Gallen is a top fifteen sp

0:08:05.320 --> 0:08:07.800
<v Speaker 1>next year or would we go higher to top ten?

0:08:08.840 --> 0:08:11.040
<v Speaker 2>Well? I think he should be, but I think he's

0:08:11.040 --> 0:08:13.720
<v Speaker 2>going to push back close. I'm asking you though, like

0:08:13.800 --> 0:08:16.520
<v Speaker 2>your value on? Oh yeah, yeah, I think that I'd

0:08:16.520 --> 0:08:18.720
<v Speaker 2>have him as a top fifteen guy. He could potentially

0:08:18.720 --> 0:08:20.840
<v Speaker 2>push that top ten, but there's just a lot of

0:08:20.840 --> 0:08:22.600
<v Speaker 2>talent up there at the top at this point where

0:08:22.880 --> 0:08:25.160
<v Speaker 2>you know, maybe the strikeouts hind him a bit, but

0:08:25.800 --> 0:08:28.920
<v Speaker 2>right now I valume as top fifteen guy moving forward.

0:08:29.800 --> 0:08:33.120
<v Speaker 1>There was this really fun bet last night that I

0:08:33.120 --> 0:08:35.080
<v Speaker 1>don't know how everybody got it or whatever, but it

0:08:35.080 --> 0:08:38.080
<v Speaker 1>was on a promotion on DK and the promotion was

0:08:38.520 --> 0:08:41.760
<v Speaker 1>the Padres were minus three sixty five. You know who's

0:08:41.760 --> 0:08:44.360
<v Speaker 1>going to bet that? And it says, hey, everybody, you

0:08:44.360 --> 0:08:47.200
<v Speaker 1>can bet fifty bucks and we're gonna give you even

0:08:47.280 --> 0:08:50.920
<v Speaker 1>money on the Padres. You Darvish going against the dumb

0:08:51.000 --> 0:08:55.280
<v Speaker 1>Nationals with Soto playing his team. Doesn't this look fun?

0:08:55.559 --> 0:08:56.240
<v Speaker 2>It was.

0:08:56.320 --> 0:08:58.200
<v Speaker 1>It is one of those moments that makes you think

0:08:58.240 --> 0:09:00.840
<v Speaker 1>there is somebody that has a time machine travels on

0:09:00.880 --> 0:09:04.480
<v Speaker 1>how they're able to place these things, because yes, there's

0:09:04.480 --> 0:09:06.679
<v Speaker 1>a certain dummy that could not take that even money

0:09:06.679 --> 0:09:09.800
<v Speaker 1>on the Padres. And last night they had the game

0:09:09.880 --> 0:09:12.000
<v Speaker 1>tied up, so I was obviously watching it very intently.

0:09:12.920 --> 0:09:16.920
<v Speaker 1>Darvish gave up two singles to start off the ninth

0:09:16.960 --> 0:09:18.640
<v Speaker 1>inning or eighth inning, Yeah, it was the top of

0:09:18.640 --> 0:09:20.720
<v Speaker 1>the ninth I think it was, and they bring in

0:09:20.800 --> 0:09:24.920
<v Speaker 1>Josh Hater, and Josh Hater allows a pair of inherited

0:09:24.960 --> 0:09:27.120
<v Speaker 1>runs to score and recorded a pair of outs on

0:09:27.160 --> 0:09:31.280
<v Speaker 1>Thursday which in this appearance he does not look right,

0:09:31.320 --> 0:09:34.960
<v Speaker 1>could not throw strikes, he walked the bases loaded, which

0:09:35.000 --> 0:09:37.920
<v Speaker 1>brought in a run, and then subsequently another run came

0:09:37.920 --> 0:09:42.559
<v Speaker 1>in off of a sackfly. Josh Hater has an eight

0:09:42.840 --> 0:09:46.880
<v Speaker 1>point one ERA with a over two whip, four walks,

0:09:46.880 --> 0:09:51.120
<v Speaker 1>four strikeouts in four appearances with the Padres so far.

0:09:51.360 --> 0:09:53.920
<v Speaker 1>Claig what is wrong with Josh Hater?

0:09:54.880 --> 0:09:55.280
<v Speaker 3>I don't know.

0:09:55.280 --> 0:09:58.880
<v Speaker 2>I wish I could pinpoint something, but something started going

0:09:58.920 --> 0:10:02.800
<v Speaker 2>wrong mid July and July thirteenth was really like the downfall,

0:10:03.200 --> 0:10:05.640
<v Speaker 2>and since then he has a fifteen point two sixty

0:10:05.800 --> 0:10:09.079
<v Speaker 2>RA a ten to five six FIP, so doesn't look

0:10:09.120 --> 0:10:11.400
<v Speaker 2>good there. The walks have just gotten out of control.

0:10:11.760 --> 0:10:14.720
<v Speaker 2>The home runs are out of control. Still striking batters out,

0:10:14.800 --> 0:10:17.560
<v Speaker 2>but doesn't matter when you're walking the amount that you

0:10:17.600 --> 0:10:20.800
<v Speaker 2>are and then allowing those to come in by home run.

0:10:20.920 --> 0:10:24.480
<v Speaker 2>So I've struggled to really pinpoint with him what exactly

0:10:24.520 --> 0:10:27.679
<v Speaker 2>is wrong. But there's something totally off with him.

0:10:28.160 --> 0:10:30.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm glad I made that. He owes me money.

0:10:30.200 --> 0:10:32.520
<v Speaker 1>He owes me money on that one, but luckily I

0:10:32.559 --> 0:10:35.360
<v Speaker 1>had a nice other bet put together that we made

0:10:35.360 --> 0:10:37.480
<v Speaker 1>money yesterday, but that was one of those it's supposed

0:10:37.480 --> 0:10:39.240
<v Speaker 1>to be a slam dunk. Those are those slam dunk

0:10:39.280 --> 0:10:43.480
<v Speaker 1>ones and those promotions they get to and so does

0:10:43.559 --> 0:10:48.160
<v Speaker 1>Josh Hater in these situations. Also, he just wasn't throwing

0:10:48.200 --> 0:10:50.959
<v Speaker 1>strikes properly, like he couldn't. He looked like he had

0:10:51.000 --> 0:10:53.200
<v Speaker 1>no feel And as the announcers were talking about, one

0:10:53.200 --> 0:10:55.880
<v Speaker 1>of the things that's happening, he's working behind himself so

0:10:56.000 --> 0:10:59.439
<v Speaker 1>much that the early count stuff is killing him because

0:10:59.520 --> 0:11:02.080
<v Speaker 1>then hitch our hitters are just looking for one pitch,

0:11:02.160 --> 0:11:04.480
<v Speaker 1>especially when he's not commanding. They're looking for one thing

0:11:04.559 --> 0:11:06.679
<v Speaker 1>later in the count, and they're taking advantage of it.

0:11:06.760 --> 0:11:06.960
<v Speaker 3>You know.

0:11:07.040 --> 0:11:10.080
<v Speaker 1>Hitter's like only one thing against Josh Hater, and it's disgusting.

0:11:10.200 --> 0:11:12.840
<v Speaker 1>It's fastballs, and that's what they do when he can't

0:11:12.840 --> 0:11:15.440
<v Speaker 1>command any of his offspeed stuff early on and he

0:11:15.520 --> 0:11:18.120
<v Speaker 1>needs to get it right. A couple other little notes here.

0:11:18.640 --> 0:11:21.880
<v Speaker 1>Rangers inter manager Tony Beasley said on Thursday that Josh

0:11:21.880 --> 0:11:26.320
<v Speaker 1>Young major league debut is not eminent. He is not

0:11:26.640 --> 0:11:30.120
<v Speaker 1>coming up in the near future, which I actually don't think.

0:11:30.120 --> 0:11:31.920
<v Speaker 1>This is a horrible thing. I would just throw out

0:11:31.920 --> 0:11:35.120
<v Speaker 1>that good. At least we get some information. I love information,

0:11:35.200 --> 0:11:36.640
<v Speaker 1>so then I don't have to worry about it. I

0:11:36.640 --> 0:11:39.160
<v Speaker 1>don't have to freak out and be like, all right,

0:11:39.200 --> 0:11:41.280
<v Speaker 1>let's go pick up Josh Young. Let's be crazy. I mean,

0:11:41.320 --> 0:11:43.600
<v Speaker 1>I didn't think he was coming up tomorrow. I said,

0:11:43.679 --> 0:11:47.439
<v Speaker 1>let's actually watch, let's maintain, let's see can we get

0:11:47.520 --> 0:11:50.400
<v Speaker 1>him up. I still think September is an opportunity and

0:11:50.440 --> 0:11:52.360
<v Speaker 1>it's and the reason this question is coming up Claig

0:11:52.400 --> 0:11:54.959
<v Speaker 1>is because he's hitting four hundred. He's aating four to

0:11:54.960 --> 0:11:57.360
<v Speaker 1>twenty four in Triple A right now, where he hit

0:11:57.640 --> 0:11:59.400
<v Speaker 1>two forty in the complex, but he's up to three

0:11:59.400 --> 0:12:03.200
<v Speaker 1>twenty five on the season. I believe it is, or

0:12:03.360 --> 0:12:05.520
<v Speaker 1>what is the total number here? I'm actually I think

0:12:05.520 --> 0:12:07.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying no. Three forty five on the year, where

0:12:07.960 --> 0:12:10.360
<v Speaker 1>he had another homer earlier in the week with a

0:12:10.559 --> 0:12:14.240
<v Speaker 1>thousand slug And there is a question we can ask, like,

0:12:14.400 --> 0:12:17.160
<v Speaker 1>what is this doing for him? Being in Triple A

0:12:17.240 --> 0:12:19.400
<v Speaker 1>guy's hitting four hundred, what else is he learning? Maybe

0:12:19.440 --> 0:12:21.440
<v Speaker 1>they've got things we don't know about that he's working on,

0:12:21.880 --> 0:12:24.559
<v Speaker 1>but they say it's not imminent. I don't think that

0:12:24.760 --> 0:12:26.679
<v Speaker 1>means he doesn't come up at all. But I do

0:12:26.720 --> 0:12:28.800
<v Speaker 1>think that means you can clear your mind right now

0:12:28.840 --> 0:12:31.280
<v Speaker 1>because if the Rangers, I think the Rangers give him

0:12:31.280 --> 0:12:32.959
<v Speaker 1>a couple I don't know if it's a big plan

0:12:33.000 --> 0:12:35.840
<v Speaker 1>for it. Bottom line, the guy needs at bats. He

0:12:35.960 --> 0:12:37.840
<v Speaker 1>will get them in the AFL this year. I have

0:12:38.080 --> 0:12:41.280
<v Speaker 1>zero point zero percent question that he will be in

0:12:41.320 --> 0:12:45.040
<v Speaker 1>the AFL. It's just will they, in your mind give

0:12:45.120 --> 0:12:47.760
<v Speaker 1>Josh Young at bats at the major league level this year,

0:12:47.840 --> 0:12:49.080
<v Speaker 1>knowing the time he's missed.

0:12:49.880 --> 0:12:53.120
<v Speaker 2>Well, I'm conflicted there because you know, part of me thinks, well,

0:12:53.160 --> 0:12:56.080
<v Speaker 2>he's more than any We've seen that, and I think

0:12:56.200 --> 0:12:57.960
<v Speaker 2>he needs to be challenged at the major league level.

0:12:58.000 --> 0:12:59.960
<v Speaker 2>I mean, we saw him tear up triple A les

0:13:00.040 --> 0:13:02.400
<v Speaker 2>last year. Obviously the injury set him back. I think

0:13:02.400 --> 0:13:04.560
<v Speaker 2>he would have been a debut really early in the

0:13:04.600 --> 0:13:09.200
<v Speaker 2>season if not for the injury. But on the flip side,

0:13:09.200 --> 0:13:11.640
<v Speaker 2>the Rangers have nothing to play for, so they have

0:13:11.720 --> 0:13:15.200
<v Speaker 2>real no incentive to bring him up, and he would

0:13:15.200 --> 0:13:18.800
<v Speaker 2>obviously make that team better. But right now, you know,

0:13:18.920 --> 0:13:22.160
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. Yeah, obviously you want to wait until

0:13:22.400 --> 0:13:25.040
<v Speaker 2>he can at least keep his rookie service clock through

0:13:25.120 --> 0:13:27.960
<v Speaker 2>next year. So at that point, I think that date

0:13:28.200 --> 0:13:32.200
<v Speaker 2>is August twenty third for the service time where he

0:13:32.240 --> 0:13:35.040
<v Speaker 2>could come up and still be rookie eligible next year.

0:13:35.320 --> 0:13:38.319
<v Speaker 2>So it's possible we see him in September, maybe mid September,

0:13:38.320 --> 0:13:40.440
<v Speaker 2>but I don't really see him have anything left to

0:13:40.440 --> 0:13:41.640
<v Speaker 2>prove at Triple A at this point.

0:13:42.080 --> 0:13:44.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and also you got to think about, like I said,

0:13:44.040 --> 0:13:47.200
<v Speaker 1>at bats at bats at bats, so I believe this

0:13:47.280 --> 0:13:48.559
<v Speaker 1>is going to be something. This is going to be

0:13:48.600 --> 0:13:51.480
<v Speaker 1>a playoff pick up. So my big advice has been,

0:13:52.040 --> 0:13:54.360
<v Speaker 1>if you want to be ahead of the game, you

0:13:54.360 --> 0:13:55.679
<v Speaker 1>can pick him up. Try to get him up a

0:13:55.720 --> 0:13:58.400
<v Speaker 1>week before. And I think that's right at September, because

0:13:58.440 --> 0:14:00.360
<v Speaker 1>maybe they stick him through through the Triple A season,

0:14:00.360 --> 0:14:02.840
<v Speaker 1>which I think goes through like July eighteenth or fifteenth

0:14:02.880 --> 0:14:05.480
<v Speaker 1>or something like that, right in that range, and then

0:14:05.520 --> 0:14:07.440
<v Speaker 1>you've got a couple of weeks where I think they

0:14:07.440 --> 0:14:09.679
<v Speaker 1>would want to throw him into the majors, and then

0:14:09.720 --> 0:14:12.320
<v Speaker 1>he'll come over to AFL which starts October third, which

0:14:12.320 --> 0:14:15.760
<v Speaker 1>I will be covering, and there'd be no reason to

0:14:15.760 --> 0:14:18.360
<v Speaker 1>give him any type of a break in between there,

0:14:18.480 --> 0:14:21.920
<v Speaker 1>so he will get me. I have zero percent concern

0:14:22.000 --> 0:14:23.640
<v Speaker 1>or question that he will get at bats. I just

0:14:23.680 --> 0:14:25.960
<v Speaker 1>don't know if they'll be big impactful as far as

0:14:26.000 --> 0:14:28.240
<v Speaker 1>like us trying to go and pick up the big

0:14:28.280 --> 0:14:30.840
<v Speaker 1>next player. Keep an eye on it, but at least

0:14:30.840 --> 0:14:33.800
<v Speaker 1>they gave you some information that it's not imminent, so

0:14:33.840 --> 0:14:38.320
<v Speaker 1>maybe you can just look elsewhere. Also, the shows off,

0:14:38.320 --> 0:14:40.520
<v Speaker 1>Elvis Andrews is signing with a White Sox after being

0:14:40.600 --> 0:14:42.960
<v Speaker 1>released by the A's, and there's some weirdness around that

0:14:43.520 --> 0:14:46.760
<v Speaker 1>there without Tim Anderson. Jeff Passen reported this, Elvis Andris

0:14:46.800 --> 0:14:50.080
<v Speaker 1>going to the White Sox for whatever value that's actually

0:14:50.160 --> 0:14:52.960
<v Speaker 1>going to be, which is pretty minimal. On the injury front,

0:14:53.320 --> 0:14:55.040
<v Speaker 1>Brandon marsh is going on the ten day IL with

0:14:55.120 --> 0:14:57.160
<v Speaker 1>a bone bruise in his left knee and left ankle.

0:14:57.240 --> 0:15:00.720
<v Speaker 1>Spring Anthony Sinzetela was lifted from Thursdays start as Saint

0:15:00.720 --> 0:15:03.520
<v Speaker 1>Louis due to an apparent left leg injury. And just

0:15:03.640 --> 0:15:06.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, the Cardinals James Paxton is being evaluated for

0:15:07.000 --> 0:15:09.280
<v Speaker 1>left lap tightness. We don't ever talk about him. I

0:15:09.440 --> 0:15:12.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of forgot he existed. And an MRI and Tyler

0:15:12.120 --> 0:15:14.960
<v Speaker 1>Moley's right shoulder turned up clean, no structural damage and

0:15:14.960 --> 0:15:17.120
<v Speaker 1>it looks like it's not gonna be anything bad clig,

0:15:17.120 --> 0:15:22.360
<v Speaker 1>which is beautiful, right, Oh yeah, for sure. Here's a

0:15:22.400 --> 0:15:25.840
<v Speaker 1>fun fact. Yesterday we had a good you know, when

0:15:25.840 --> 0:15:27.440
<v Speaker 1>we're talking bets, we had a good call on Alex

0:15:27.480 --> 0:15:29.680
<v Speaker 1>Bregman talking about the total base when I was digging

0:15:29.720 --> 0:15:33.680
<v Speaker 1>in he was not the odds on favorite. But what

0:15:33.720 --> 0:15:36.080
<v Speaker 1>I do every single day, we'll do shortly, is I

0:15:36.120 --> 0:15:38.080
<v Speaker 1>pick the number one on the prop cheat sheet and

0:15:38.120 --> 0:15:40.480
<v Speaker 1>then I take where that could be, whatever type of

0:15:40.560 --> 0:15:43.240
<v Speaker 1>juice up money. Then I go find the positive money.

0:15:43.400 --> 0:15:45.600
<v Speaker 1>And Bregman was a positive money and Bregman had a

0:15:45.680 --> 0:15:49.359
<v Speaker 1>day well. Alex Bregman had two homers and two doubles.

0:15:49.960 --> 0:15:52.760
<v Speaker 1>Since nineteen oh one, this has only been done one

0:15:52.880 --> 0:15:57.160
<v Speaker 1>hundred and eighteen times. In comparison, there have been two

0:15:57.280 --> 0:16:01.200
<v Speaker 1>hundred and ninety five cycles in baseball. A wild stat.

0:16:01.440 --> 0:16:05.080
<v Speaker 1>Two homers, two doubles only one hundred and eighteen times

0:16:05.160 --> 0:16:08.440
<v Speaker 1>in baseball since nineteen oh one. That's that's bonkers.

0:16:09.520 --> 0:16:10.160
<v Speaker 3>That's crazy.

0:16:10.640 --> 0:16:12.640
<v Speaker 2>It's when you think about it, you think about the

0:16:12.640 --> 0:16:15.800
<v Speaker 2>cycle not happening often, and you read those numbers and

0:16:15.800 --> 0:16:18.400
<v Speaker 2>it's like, wow, that's only happened, you know, less than

0:16:18.400 --> 0:16:21.520
<v Speaker 2>half the time. So pretty impressive feet for Bregman. Good

0:16:21.600 --> 0:16:23.360
<v Speaker 2>day for him, for sure, and good to see him

0:16:23.640 --> 0:16:24.640
<v Speaker 2>kind of picking it up a bit.

0:16:25.000 --> 0:16:26.920
<v Speaker 1>Bregman needs a little bit of a pickup if he's going.

0:16:27.040 --> 0:16:28.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think I said this like last week.

0:16:28.760 --> 0:16:30.400
<v Speaker 1>He's just we know who he is now. I actually

0:16:30.400 --> 0:16:33.040
<v Speaker 1>appreciate Pregman because we know he's like a twenty five

0:16:33.240 --> 0:16:35.720
<v Speaker 1>homer guy, and that's what you should consider him. And

0:16:35.760 --> 0:16:39.360
<v Speaker 1>if you like twenty five homer ninety ninety, you know,

0:16:40.000 --> 0:16:43.520
<v Speaker 1>questionable batting average between two seventy and two ninety third baseman.

0:16:43.880 --> 0:16:45.960
<v Speaker 1>That's solid, but it's not elite. That's just who he's

0:16:46.000 --> 0:16:48.520
<v Speaker 1>gonna be. And he has some outputs like this this

0:16:48.600 --> 0:16:51.520
<v Speaker 1>day in Baseball nineteen twenty one, Ty Cobb gets hit

0:16:51.640 --> 0:16:55.000
<v Speaker 1>number three thousand of Boston pitcher Elmer Myers. At thirty

0:16:55.000 --> 0:16:57.960
<v Speaker 1>four years old, he's the youngest to ever do it.

0:16:58.080 --> 0:17:00.840
<v Speaker 1>I liked that wonky piece here that she put together.

0:17:01.120 --> 0:17:03.280
<v Speaker 1>And then I have a trivia question and I took

0:17:03.320 --> 0:17:06.400
<v Speaker 1>the answer off Cleig, so you can play along on Thursday.

0:17:06.440 --> 0:17:09.639
<v Speaker 1>Albert poolhols it is sixteenth Grand Slam of his career,

0:17:09.840 --> 0:17:13.439
<v Speaker 1>sixteenth of his career tying him for tenth on the

0:17:13.560 --> 0:17:18.800
<v Speaker 1>all time list. Who is MLB's all time leader in

0:17:18.920 --> 0:17:21.639
<v Speaker 1>Grand Slams? Do you know?

0:17:22.720 --> 0:17:23.240
<v Speaker 3>I don't know.

0:17:23.840 --> 0:17:27.199
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna guess it's somebody like pretty high up on

0:17:27.280 --> 0:17:30.080
<v Speaker 2>the all time home run list, though.

0:17:30.680 --> 0:17:36.040
<v Speaker 1>Good guess any guesses, I'll repeat the question. Well, Clig

0:17:36.080 --> 0:17:39.320
<v Speaker 1>thinks on Thursday, Hale say it is sixteenth Grand Slam,

0:17:39.359 --> 0:17:41.439
<v Speaker 1>tying him for tenth on the list. So you know

0:17:41.560 --> 0:17:44.840
<v Speaker 1>sixteen is tenth on the list. Who is the all

0:17:45.119 --> 0:17:49.399
<v Speaker 1>time leader? And this is not something that you're gonna

0:17:49.600 --> 0:17:51.959
<v Speaker 1>be This is not somebody like in the nineteen hundreds

0:17:52.000 --> 0:17:52.399
<v Speaker 1>or whatever.

0:17:54.359 --> 0:17:55.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's just a more recent player.

0:17:57.080 --> 0:17:59.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna just take a shot at a rod because

0:17:59.040 --> 0:18:01.400
<v Speaker 2>I do remember him hitting a good many Grand Slams.

0:18:01.440 --> 0:18:03.000
<v Speaker 3>So I don't know if he's at the top or not.

0:18:03.119 --> 0:18:04.320
<v Speaker 3>But that's my guess.

0:18:04.400 --> 0:18:08.320
<v Speaker 1>Yep, just Bob dropped it. You dropped it, that's right,

0:18:08.880 --> 0:18:14.399
<v Speaker 1>twenty five career Grand slams. Alex Rodriguez, Bonds would have

0:18:14.600 --> 0:18:16.680
<v Speaker 1>bombs would have been my guess. That's what JP and

0:18:16.720 --> 0:18:18.800
<v Speaker 1>Wonkey did. I would have one hundred percent went to

0:18:18.840 --> 0:18:23.640
<v Speaker 1>Bonds even first, But no, Alex Rodriguez twenty five Grand Slams.

0:18:23.760 --> 0:18:27.680
<v Speaker 1>That is a lot. I think that's yeah. Alex Rodriguez

0:18:27.720 --> 0:18:30.440
<v Speaker 1>had more Grand Slams and one pier had career homers.

0:18:30.680 --> 0:18:32.280
<v Speaker 1>I think that I think that's a correct stat. I

0:18:32.280 --> 0:18:34.639
<v Speaker 1>don't remember one peer's homers, but I do feel like

0:18:34.640 --> 0:18:38.360
<v Speaker 1>we've talked about it this year. Stat heroes Alex Bregman

0:18:38.480 --> 0:18:41.280
<v Speaker 1>four for six, two homers, a stolen base as well

0:18:41.280 --> 0:18:45.359
<v Speaker 1>as a little combole action and six RBI, take four runs.

0:18:45.520 --> 0:18:48.160
<v Speaker 1>Every bet on him paid off. Brian Reynolds, we talked

0:18:48.160 --> 0:18:50.920
<v Speaker 1>about continues to heat up, keeps it going three for four,

0:18:51.000 --> 0:18:53.800
<v Speaker 1>two homers, four RBI. Andrew mccutchon had two bombs as

0:18:53.800 --> 0:18:57.280
<v Speaker 1>well three RBI, three runs, Chas McCormick a homer, five

0:18:57.480 --> 0:19:00.760
<v Speaker 1>RBI twenty one runs. We didn't really mention yesterday the

0:19:00.760 --> 0:19:03.639
<v Speaker 1>Astros put up on the white Sox. Wilson Contreras had

0:19:03.680 --> 0:19:06.399
<v Speaker 1>two homers. Hunter Renfro perfect three for three with a

0:19:06.400 --> 0:19:09.000
<v Speaker 1>home run. Lars Nootbar, but I think we mentioned on

0:19:09.119 --> 0:19:11.200
<v Speaker 1>the DFS stacks to take a look at he was

0:19:11.240 --> 0:19:14.359
<v Speaker 1>two for three with a homer, two RBI. Springer five

0:19:14.600 --> 0:19:17.919
<v Speaker 1>for five, Albert Poohols with that bomb in Yondi Diaz

0:19:17.960 --> 0:19:20.520
<v Speaker 1>two for four, homer three RBIs. On the pitching side,

0:19:20.640 --> 0:19:22.440
<v Speaker 1>we talked about Gallon. He had seven and one third,

0:19:22.520 --> 0:19:25.639
<v Speaker 1>only give up four hits with twelve strikeouts. JD. Brewbaker

0:19:25.920 --> 0:19:29.600
<v Speaker 1>seven and seven, Adam Wainwright seven and seven, you Darvish

0:19:29.680 --> 0:19:33.560
<v Speaker 1>eight and one third, six strikeouts, and Max Fried seven

0:19:33.760 --> 0:19:37.920
<v Speaker 1>with six caves. JD. Brewbakers another one of those guys

0:19:37.920 --> 0:19:41.400
<v Speaker 1>that has just been like sneaky production in the right matchups. Clegg,

0:19:41.880 --> 0:19:44.840
<v Speaker 1>is he one of those like on your eye, get

0:19:44.920 --> 0:19:48.120
<v Speaker 1>him in a rotation of streamable pitchers for the rest

0:19:48.160 --> 0:19:51.880
<v Speaker 1>of the season into the playoffs, because he's definitely been that. Really,

0:19:51.920 --> 0:19:53.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm asking like, is he streamable or is he a

0:19:53.760 --> 0:19:55.760
<v Speaker 1>guy you want to hold on to for matchups through

0:19:55.760 --> 0:19:56.480
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the year.

0:19:57.200 --> 0:19:58.960
<v Speaker 2>I think you can hold on to him and play

0:19:59.000 --> 0:20:01.919
<v Speaker 2>matchups with him, and you know, really you look at

0:20:01.920 --> 0:20:05.240
<v Speaker 2>his game again as a recent outside of the big

0:20:05.280 --> 0:20:07.520
<v Speaker 2>blow up against the Phillies where he allowed seven earned

0:20:07.560 --> 0:20:10.560
<v Speaker 2>he's been pretty good and over his last three especially

0:20:10.960 --> 0:20:13.600
<v Speaker 2>in solids. He faced the Orioles d Backs and then

0:20:13.640 --> 0:20:16.760
<v Speaker 2>the Red Sox last night. But still, I mean, the

0:20:16.760 --> 0:20:20.040
<v Speaker 2>production's there and I almost think he's a hole, and

0:20:20.080 --> 0:20:23.200
<v Speaker 2>you roster him and you plug him in really in

0:20:23.240 --> 0:20:25.480
<v Speaker 2>almost any matchup, because for the most part this year

0:20:25.560 --> 0:20:28.760
<v Speaker 2>he's been pretty serviceable, especially in a deeper league if

0:20:28.800 --> 0:20:30.480
<v Speaker 2>you're in like a fifteen team or I think that

0:20:30.920 --> 0:20:33.400
<v Speaker 2>brew Baker's one you can really run with moving forward

0:20:33.400 --> 0:20:34.159
<v Speaker 2>and rest of the season.

0:20:34.440 --> 0:20:36.320
<v Speaker 1>It's one of those guys we're gonna start. We're gonna

0:20:36.320 --> 0:20:38.159
<v Speaker 1>start this up where we're gonna be like if you

0:20:38.200 --> 0:20:40.439
<v Speaker 1>get brew Baker on the Cardinals, you get brew Baker

0:20:40.440 --> 0:20:43.080
<v Speaker 1>on the Mariners, just wait and it's like what they

0:20:43.119 --> 0:20:47.359
<v Speaker 1>do the Pirates. The Pirates brew up pictures for other teams.

0:20:47.480 --> 0:20:50.919
<v Speaker 1>That's what they developed, Pictures that will succeed elsewhere and

0:20:50.960 --> 0:20:54.359
<v Speaker 1>not in Pittsburgh. Maybe one day. Stat zero's Cody Bellinger

0:20:54.400 --> 0:20:57.920
<v Speaker 1>Andrew Benintended, Trent Grisham and Brandon nemo all zero for

0:20:58.040 --> 0:21:01.840
<v Speaker 1>four with three strikeouts yesterday. I feel that Grisham one

0:21:01.920 --> 0:21:04.600
<v Speaker 1>real hard and Cody Bellinger, we know they're gonna start

0:21:04.600 --> 0:21:06.879
<v Speaker 1>giving some rest and you should have rested him on

0:21:06.920 --> 0:21:11.240
<v Speaker 1>the waiver wire weeks ago. Pitchers Lucas Gielito three innings,

0:21:11.280 --> 0:21:15.720
<v Speaker 1>seven earned runs, Woolf Zach Log seven earned runs, Antonio

0:21:15.800 --> 0:21:18.399
<v Speaker 1>Senzatela didn't even get into the second with that injury,

0:21:18.440 --> 0:21:20.600
<v Speaker 1>but he gave up five earned runs to boot Logan

0:21:20.680 --> 0:21:24.240
<v Speaker 1>Web four and two third nine hits with three earned runs,

0:21:24.400 --> 0:21:28.439
<v Speaker 1>zero strikeouts, and Frankie Montoss six earned run, eight hits,

0:21:28.520 --> 0:21:34.360
<v Speaker 1>two k's. Had a parlay bet yesterday of team total

0:21:34.560 --> 0:21:37.120
<v Speaker 1>through the first five one and a half on the Pirates,

0:21:37.160 --> 0:21:39.440
<v Speaker 1>one and a half on the Blue Jays for both

0:21:39.440 --> 0:21:43.480
<v Speaker 1>of those attacked. Frankie Montass that's smacked in the second inning.

0:21:43.640 --> 0:21:46.280
<v Speaker 1>Shout out to my boy John Legaza who had that

0:21:46.480 --> 0:21:50.320
<v Speaker 1>on his free Patreon sheet. I loved it. Team totals

0:21:50.320 --> 0:21:52.080
<v Speaker 1>are kind of the fun way to play right now.

0:21:52.160 --> 0:21:56.240
<v Speaker 1>First five is really rough. Lines are really rough total bases.

0:21:56.280 --> 0:21:58.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm about to tell you how crazy total bases are

0:21:58.520 --> 0:22:00.480
<v Speaker 1>getting right now. So if you can get some team

0:22:00.560 --> 0:22:02.760
<v Speaker 1>totals in attack, it worked out. And I hit that

0:22:02.800 --> 0:22:06.000
<v Speaker 1>one in the second inning yesterday and that one was

0:22:06.040 --> 0:22:08.640
<v Speaker 1>a nice little plus money two hundred and I had

0:22:08.640 --> 0:22:11.120
<v Speaker 1>a little boost on it for three hundred. So get

0:22:11.160 --> 0:22:14.800
<v Speaker 1>them bets in here. Homer leaderboard, we don't have one.

0:22:14.880 --> 0:22:16.879
<v Speaker 1>We don't have an updated homer and leaderboard, but I

0:22:16.920 --> 0:22:21.600
<v Speaker 1>can update you that we got a tie. Deeblum Manny Machado.

0:22:21.680 --> 0:22:25.840
<v Speaker 1>Homer last night got him tied with high Cubby forty four.

0:22:25.960 --> 0:22:29.600
<v Speaker 1>Forty four Go Cards and Mike Mayor both had Machado

0:22:29.640 --> 0:22:31.800
<v Speaker 1>as well. They are on the heels at forty two,

0:22:32.280 --> 0:22:34.119
<v Speaker 1>tarry down at forty one. We had a little bit

0:22:34.119 --> 0:22:36.560
<v Speaker 1>of action lower getting up, but we have five people

0:22:36.560 --> 0:22:38.920
<v Speaker 1>in the forties and it is a tight race as

0:22:38.920 --> 0:22:40.919
<v Speaker 1>we get to the back half of the year. And

0:22:41.000 --> 0:22:42.439
<v Speaker 1>I think I would have hit my guy as a

0:22:42.440 --> 0:22:45.600
<v Speaker 1>total base prop, but not my actual player. And that

0:22:45.720 --> 0:22:50.399
<v Speaker 1>takes us over to the king of sports betting, even

0:22:51.480 --> 0:22:56.040
<v Speaker 1>the Queen. Yes, bet MGM, let me get this on

0:22:56.160 --> 0:23:01.280
<v Speaker 1>bet MGM, the king. The promo code Lee off one

0:23:01.320 --> 0:23:05.639
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollars risk free bet you can bet today and

0:23:05.720 --> 0:23:07.760
<v Speaker 1>I might wear this. Yes, Cleig, I want to tell

0:23:07.760 --> 0:23:10.920
<v Speaker 1>you a quick story yesterday. If everyone can see, boy,

0:23:11.000 --> 0:23:14.080
<v Speaker 1>this is not this is not a flattering tiara. If

0:23:14.080 --> 0:23:16.600
<v Speaker 1>you don't know on the podcast what's happening, the tiara

0:23:16.680 --> 0:23:19.359
<v Speaker 1>is back. Everybody you can see this is a different

0:23:19.400 --> 0:23:22.159
<v Speaker 1>tiara Because I stepped out of my house and I

0:23:22.200 --> 0:23:25.200
<v Speaker 1>saw a package on my door, and I go, yeah,

0:23:25.280 --> 0:23:27.320
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, I just realized, Craig has absolutely

0:23:27.359 --> 0:23:29.400
<v Speaker 1>no idea what's happening with this. You haven't been around

0:23:29.480 --> 0:23:32.480
<v Speaker 1>for what's going on. So I have a package. I

0:23:32.520 --> 0:23:34.240
<v Speaker 1>set it aside, I go out, I come home and

0:23:34.240 --> 0:23:36.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, what is this package? I open it up

0:23:37.040 --> 0:23:41.760
<v Speaker 1>and there are ten tiaras at my front door, and

0:23:41.800 --> 0:23:43.520
<v Speaker 1>I kind of sit there and I go, what is

0:23:43.560 --> 0:23:48.040
<v Speaker 1>happening here? And I realize somebody who has not announced

0:23:48.080 --> 0:23:53.880
<v Speaker 1>themselves sent me ten. I'm gonna call them official BETGM tiaras.

0:23:54.400 --> 0:23:57.080
<v Speaker 1>We will never now be without a tiara for all

0:23:57.119 --> 0:24:00.000
<v Speaker 1>of our reads. So yes, it is officially back on Friday,

0:24:00.080 --> 0:24:03.080
<v Speaker 1>and Clig if you're wondering, our boy Joe Piezopia has

0:24:03.119 --> 0:24:05.520
<v Speaker 1>this beautiful crown that he would always wear, this big

0:24:06.080 --> 0:24:09.000
<v Speaker 1>king's crown. So when he left, I didn't have a crown.

0:24:09.400 --> 0:24:12.520
<v Speaker 1>But my daughter has some tiaras, so I put on

0:24:12.560 --> 0:24:14.760
<v Speaker 1>the tiara and then she hid it from me. So

0:24:14.800 --> 0:24:17.720
<v Speaker 1>someone decided to order. So now we've got some tirras.

0:24:17.720 --> 0:24:19.920
<v Speaker 1>If I do an auction at some point, some game used,

0:24:19.960 --> 0:24:22.800
<v Speaker 1>we'll do game used tiaras at some point. But yes,

0:24:22.880 --> 0:24:25.280
<v Speaker 1>Bet MGM, yeah, they thought you thought you might like that,

0:24:25.840 --> 0:24:29.359
<v Speaker 1>Bet MGM promo code leading off, support them, support us,

0:24:29.400 --> 0:24:32.000
<v Speaker 1>support the Tiara clig. I got four bets for you,

0:24:32.040 --> 0:24:33.359
<v Speaker 1>and I want to get your take on which one

0:24:33.400 --> 0:24:37.040
<v Speaker 1>you like the most. As always two strikeout bets. One

0:24:37.160 --> 0:24:40.320
<v Speaker 1>is the top algorithm play. One is the only plus

0:24:40.359 --> 0:24:42.199
<v Speaker 1>money or the top money plus money play. And then

0:24:42.240 --> 0:24:44.720
<v Speaker 1>same thing with total bases. So the top I'm gonna

0:24:44.720 --> 0:24:46.119
<v Speaker 1>take this off. By the way, we don't need to

0:24:46.119 --> 0:24:47.800
<v Speaker 1>do the whole read with it. It does not it

0:24:47.840 --> 0:24:52.399
<v Speaker 1>is not flattering, fitting on me or anything. The top

0:24:53.080 --> 0:24:55.040
<v Speaker 1>strikeout play and I think the top play of any

0:24:55.080 --> 0:24:59.320
<v Speaker 1>of them today is strikeouts three and a half Cutter

0:24:59.359 --> 0:25:03.520
<v Speaker 1>Crawford with Boston versus Baltimore. It's juiced at minus one

0:25:03.640 --> 0:25:07.080
<v Speaker 1>fifty nine, but they're projecting six and the numbers only

0:25:07.080 --> 0:25:09.000
<v Speaker 1>at three and a half, So that's your top play.

0:25:09.400 --> 0:25:15.240
<v Speaker 1>Your money play over on the betting pros mlbprop cheat

0:25:15.280 --> 0:25:18.520
<v Speaker 1>sheet is Tristan McKenzie for strikeouts five and a half

0:25:18.600 --> 0:25:20.679
<v Speaker 1>is the over under. They project him at almost six

0:25:20.760 --> 0:25:23.520
<v Speaker 1>and a half and it's plus one twenty now on

0:25:23.560 --> 0:25:27.639
<v Speaker 1>the hitters the total bases, the top play is Ruben

0:25:27.680 --> 0:25:30.040
<v Speaker 1>and o'dor so. On the other side, they love Cutter Crawford,

0:25:30.040 --> 0:25:33.520
<v Speaker 1>but they like Rugi. Rugi projected at almost two total bases.

0:25:33.560 --> 0:25:37.159
<v Speaker 1>You only need one, but it's one seventy three. This

0:25:37.320 --> 0:25:41.399
<v Speaker 1>was the wild one. I had to scroll pages to

0:25:41.520 --> 0:25:44.480
<v Speaker 1>find the first plus money today, and the first one

0:25:44.520 --> 0:25:47.080
<v Speaker 1>I found was one Soto on the third page of

0:25:47.119 --> 0:25:50.639
<v Speaker 1>the betting pros cheat sheet. One Soto versus Washington total

0:25:50.640 --> 0:25:54.160
<v Speaker 1>bases one and a half projected it to plus one ten.

0:25:54.480 --> 0:25:58.360
<v Speaker 1>So Clig, big old mouthful, Cutter, Crawford, Tristan McKenzie, Odoor,

0:25:58.440 --> 0:26:02.080
<v Speaker 1>and Sodo considered the juice. What plays do you actually like?

0:26:03.600 --> 0:26:06.560
<v Speaker 2>Well, Copper Crawford one seems pretty safe, and I guess

0:26:06.600 --> 0:26:09.320
<v Speaker 2>that's the reason this, You know as is he you

0:26:09.359 --> 0:26:11.920
<v Speaker 2>know all, he doesn't strike out a ton. You look

0:26:11.920 --> 0:26:14.000
<v Speaker 2>at his outings and he's only had you had to

0:26:14.040 --> 0:26:18.240
<v Speaker 2>go back. He only struck out four on sorry two

0:26:18.400 --> 0:26:21.399
<v Speaker 2>on July twenty eighth, but other than that, you'd have

0:26:21.440 --> 0:26:24.840
<v Speaker 2>to go back to June eighteenth to find an outing

0:26:24.880 --> 0:26:29.360
<v Speaker 2>where he struck out less than three or less than four,

0:26:29.400 --> 0:26:32.640
<v Speaker 2>I guess, per se, So that one seems pretty safe,

0:26:32.640 --> 0:26:36.639
<v Speaker 2>and against Baltimore seemed like you could go with that pick.

0:26:37.160 --> 0:26:39.000
<v Speaker 3>So I do like that one to go over like

0:26:39.119 --> 0:26:40.120
<v Speaker 3>three money one.

0:26:40.400 --> 0:26:42.920
<v Speaker 1>Do you like the McKenzie against Chicago five and a

0:26:42.960 --> 0:26:46.080
<v Speaker 1>half or Soto to total bases versus Washington.

0:26:47.080 --> 0:26:51.080
<v Speaker 2>Mackenzie could is he's just risky and inconsistent, like he's

0:26:51.119 --> 0:26:53.199
<v Speaker 2>been good, but the strikeout totals have been kind of

0:26:53.200 --> 0:26:54.200
<v Speaker 2>all over the place with him.

0:26:54.560 --> 0:26:57.440
<v Speaker 3>So it's highly likely that he could go strike out ten.

0:26:57.520 --> 0:26:59.800
<v Speaker 2>But it's also possible that he goes and you know

0:27:00.080 --> 0:27:01.960
<v Speaker 2>it's a five spot up. I mean, his last doubt

0:27:01.960 --> 0:27:04.480
<v Speaker 2>he only struck out three in six and two thirds.

0:27:04.520 --> 0:27:05.960
<v Speaker 2>You just don't know what you're getting from. Is kind

0:27:05.960 --> 0:27:09.120
<v Speaker 2>of a mixed bag there. The Sodo one, I feel

0:27:09.119 --> 0:27:10.879
<v Speaker 2>pretty good about it. I feel like Soda is going

0:27:10.960 --> 0:27:12.760
<v Speaker 2>to have a big game against his old team, so

0:27:13.160 --> 0:27:14.679
<v Speaker 2>like at some point, so I.

0:27:14.640 --> 0:27:16.440
<v Speaker 1>Would love it to bed have done it last night,

0:27:16.560 --> 0:27:18.600
<v Speaker 1>but I would go with that. So, by the way,

0:27:18.640 --> 0:27:21.240
<v Speaker 1>this is the big mystery too. The mystery is going

0:27:21.280 --> 0:27:24.360
<v Speaker 1>to be who sent them go kart? Says cousin Donnie.

0:27:24.720 --> 0:27:24.920
<v Speaker 2>Uh.

0:27:24.960 --> 0:27:27.119
<v Speaker 1>And then right here if Joe knows Welsh's address, so

0:27:27.160 --> 0:27:30.920
<v Speaker 1>everybody knows Joe's cousin Donnie. Donnie lives right down the

0:27:30.920 --> 0:27:33.480
<v Speaker 1>street from me. But here's the key who was in

0:27:33.520 --> 0:27:36.600
<v Speaker 1>an Amazon package. I think I know who it is.

0:27:36.720 --> 0:27:39.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm guessing, and it's it's more of an ITL person

0:27:39.840 --> 0:27:43.679
<v Speaker 1>who is always here. My guess it is Jesse or

0:27:43.680 --> 0:27:46.480
<v Speaker 1>Tummy Lesorta if he comes in here. But who knows

0:27:46.520 --> 0:27:48.439
<v Speaker 1>My address is out there in the IL Army when

0:27:48.480 --> 0:27:51.439
<v Speaker 1>people send things. The mystery of the tiaras will live on.

0:27:51.560 --> 0:27:54.520
<v Speaker 1>We'll try to uncover it. We got plenty, plenty of

0:27:54.520 --> 0:27:56.480
<v Speaker 1>pretty ones. It does not sit very I got to

0:27:56.480 --> 0:27:59.160
<v Speaker 1>figure out how to really like wear it. Well, it's

0:27:59.200 --> 0:28:01.560
<v Speaker 1>a you know what, Clegg just for you. I'll bring

0:28:01.600 --> 0:28:03.600
<v Speaker 1>you one during first pitch. I'll bring you one if.

0:28:03.440 --> 0:28:05.680
<v Speaker 3>You would like game muse, I'll gladly take one.

0:28:05.880 --> 0:28:09.920
<v Speaker 1>Okay, awesome. Over on the DFS side, Draft Kings, FanDuel.

0:28:10.040 --> 0:28:13.040
<v Speaker 1>Here's some plays for today and DraftKings. See McClanahan is

0:28:13.080 --> 0:28:16.199
<v Speaker 1>ten to two, Blake snell is nine to three. Obviously

0:28:16.200 --> 0:28:18.439
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna probably want to play one, big dog. I

0:28:18.440 --> 0:28:20.520
<v Speaker 1>feel like there could be some fading on McClanahan just

0:28:20.520 --> 0:28:22.280
<v Speaker 1>because he struggled a little bit. I like some of

0:28:22.320 --> 0:28:25.919
<v Speaker 1>the lower plays. Miles michelis seven to three and Patrick

0:28:25.920 --> 0:28:28.760
<v Speaker 1>Sandoval seven to two. Over on FanDuel, You're gonna get

0:28:28.800 --> 0:28:31.520
<v Speaker 1>McLanahan at eleven two. Snell is ten to five, Patrick

0:28:31.520 --> 0:28:34.840
<v Speaker 1>Sandoval is eight seven. There's some big implied run totals

0:28:34.880 --> 0:28:38.920
<v Speaker 1>across the board. Milwaukee, San Francisco, Dodgers in Saint Louis

0:28:39.040 --> 0:28:42.120
<v Speaker 1>all over five. I believe the Giants were projected at

0:28:42.240 --> 0:28:45.040
<v Speaker 1>six if I'm remembering correctly. So if you want to

0:28:45.080 --> 0:28:47.920
<v Speaker 1>attack any of the same players that we've kind of

0:28:47.920 --> 0:28:50.200
<v Speaker 1>been doing, you know, take top of the lineup Milwaukee,

0:28:50.200 --> 0:28:53.800
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco, Dodgers and Saint Louis, let's end it out.

0:28:53.920 --> 0:28:56.560
<v Speaker 1>Home run calls guests have been pretty on fire. I

0:28:56.720 --> 0:28:58.960
<v Speaker 1>don't think I've hit all week. I've been so close.

0:28:59.080 --> 0:29:01.120
<v Speaker 1>I talk myself out of one. I talk to myself

0:29:01.160 --> 0:29:04.240
<v Speaker 1>out of shee Leangaliers, Cleig, what do you think? What

0:29:04.320 --> 0:29:06.200
<v Speaker 1>do you got for home run call for today?

0:29:07.080 --> 0:29:10.840
<v Speaker 2>I'm going with Rafael Devers in Baltimore. Jordan Lyle's pitching.

0:29:11.240 --> 0:29:14.000
<v Speaker 2>I think it sets up pretty nicely for him. You know,

0:29:14.160 --> 0:29:18.120
<v Speaker 2>obviously we see the you know part factor totally change

0:29:18.120 --> 0:29:21.240
<v Speaker 2>in Baltimore. I don't think that's affected left handed hitters

0:29:21.280 --> 0:29:24.840
<v Speaker 2>as much. So I like Devers tonight, give me the

0:29:24.840 --> 0:29:28.000
<v Speaker 2>home run call with him. So Raphael Devers is the pick.

0:29:27.800 --> 0:29:31.280
<v Speaker 1>Here, all right? I like it. We've got Wonkey with

0:29:31.320 --> 0:29:34.640
<v Speaker 1>a Patrick Wisdom call. Like that Mayor is going Sodo.

0:29:35.240 --> 0:29:37.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna just go back to Goldie. It is a

0:29:37.840 --> 0:29:41.000
<v Speaker 1>diamondback play. That's why I like Michael is Goldie and

0:29:41.080 --> 0:29:43.960
<v Speaker 1>his old against his old team. I like that this

0:29:44.040 --> 0:29:47.040
<v Speaker 1>is a weekend play, obviously, I mean, Wonkey, you can

0:29:47.120 --> 0:29:49.240
<v Speaker 1>change it if you're gonna have somebody else weekend. But

0:29:49.240 --> 0:29:51.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm guessing Mayor is going through the weekend for Sodo.

0:29:51.520 --> 0:29:54.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm going through the weekend for Goldie. You've got Devers

0:29:54.720 --> 0:29:57.240
<v Speaker 1>good calls, and the mystery is gonna live on. Jag

0:29:57.320 --> 0:30:00.640
<v Speaker 1>In Here says Nope, it was not him. Buster says

0:30:00.680 --> 0:30:03.160
<v Speaker 1>Amazon Package it was Jeff Bezos. It could have been.

0:30:03.320 --> 0:30:05.880
<v Speaker 1>I like Wonky's goodness. If I can get your address,

0:30:06.000 --> 0:30:10.280
<v Speaker 1>I'll order an adult male Tiara, which I guarantee, which

0:30:10.320 --> 0:30:12.560
<v Speaker 1>is very true. So the mystery lives on. I don't

0:30:12.560 --> 0:30:14.760
<v Speaker 1>one hundred percent know there are it's out there. We're

0:30:14.760 --> 0:30:16.360
<v Speaker 1>going to try to uncover it. But the tir is

0:30:16.400 --> 0:30:19.520
<v Speaker 1>officially back in our stat line for the day. Doctor

0:30:19.560 --> 0:30:22.720
<v Speaker 1>Glenn has given me an outing a perfect nine, well

0:30:22.760 --> 0:30:26.600
<v Speaker 1>not perfect, but going nine to earned runs nine strikeouts

0:30:26.640 --> 0:30:29.840
<v Speaker 1>is my performance for hosting today, which I've had a

0:30:29.920 --> 0:30:32.240
<v Speaker 1>very good run this week, but it's all thanks to

0:30:32.280 --> 0:30:34.760
<v Speaker 1>the Tiara. It was I got some run support, if

0:30:34.800 --> 0:30:36.520
<v Speaker 1>you will. I gave up to earned runs, but I

0:30:36.560 --> 0:30:38.720
<v Speaker 1>had some run support from that awesome guy right there,

0:30:38.800 --> 0:30:41.400
<v Speaker 1>Chris Cleig and the Tiara. We were able to go

0:30:41.520 --> 0:30:43.920
<v Speaker 1>nine almost like Darvis should have done last night. Get nine,

0:30:43.960 --> 0:30:47.720
<v Speaker 1>give up a couple, get some good strikeouts. That's my performance.

0:30:47.840 --> 0:30:50.320
<v Speaker 1>I wonder what my era was this week, Clig, what's

0:30:50.360 --> 0:30:52.120
<v Speaker 1>going on, my friend? What do you got going down?

0:30:52.520 --> 0:30:55.000
<v Speaker 1>Podcast wise, article wise, anything people need to know.

0:30:55.840 --> 0:30:58.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you can find the weekly Quick Grades article out

0:30:58.680 --> 0:31:01.280
<v Speaker 2>for hitters and that is should be out today later

0:31:01.320 --> 0:31:03.840
<v Speaker 2>today if not, and that covers hitters for next week,

0:31:03.880 --> 0:31:07.520
<v Speaker 2>so some Monday through Sunday, and I think Devers was

0:31:07.760 --> 0:31:10.680
<v Speaker 2>actually top on that list. I have to pull it

0:31:10.760 --> 0:31:13.360
<v Speaker 2>up and see to confirm that's coming out on Fantasy

0:31:13.360 --> 0:31:16.080
<v Speaker 2>Pros and then Prospects Stashes as well. That's out of

0:31:16.160 --> 0:31:18.880
<v Speaker 2>each Tuesday. We had Brett Baty at the top of

0:31:18.920 --> 0:31:21.360
<v Speaker 2>that list. So that was a clutch call there he

0:31:21.520 --> 0:31:24.080
<v Speaker 2>came up you know, or he got the call a

0:31:24.120 --> 0:31:27.080
<v Speaker 2>few hours after that published, so that was fun to see.

0:31:27.560 --> 0:31:30.160
<v Speaker 2>And then over at Fantracks as well, doing some dynasty

0:31:30.200 --> 0:31:31.360
<v Speaker 2>and prospect work there.

0:31:31.640 --> 0:31:32.840
<v Speaker 3>Oh no, I was wrong on Devers.

0:31:32.920 --> 0:31:37.240
<v Speaker 2>Actually, the top graded out player for next week is Eloy.

0:31:37.480 --> 0:31:40.360
<v Speaker 2>I like ELOI Jmenez a lot, and it's all stat

0:31:40.400 --> 0:31:42.960
<v Speaker 2>based stuff, so Eloy grades out well, He's kind of

0:31:42.960 --> 0:31:45.240
<v Speaker 2>come back strong, so it could be a big week

0:31:45.240 --> 0:31:47.280
<v Speaker 2>for Eloy and honestly, a lot of white Sox graded

0:31:47.320 --> 0:31:48.120
<v Speaker 2>well for next week.

0:31:49.200 --> 0:31:51.160
<v Speaker 1>Well, there you go. Follow him on Twitter at rot Oclegg.

0:31:51.480 --> 0:31:54.040
<v Speaker 1>Follow me on Twitter at is it the Welsh and

0:31:54.080 --> 0:31:58.360
<v Speaker 1>friends come back next week for all the Shenanigans, all

0:31:58.360 --> 0:32:00.840
<v Speaker 1>the fun, the peanuts of cracker Jack, the hosts and

0:32:00.920 --> 0:32:03.040
<v Speaker 1>the guests. Thank you so much for hanging out with

0:32:03.080 --> 0:32:06.920
<v Speaker 1>us this week. I am Princess Welch. That is the

0:32:07.000 --> 0:32:09.200
<v Speaker 1>King Chris Clegg, we are out of here, guys. It

0:32:09.240 --> 0:32:10.400
<v Speaker 1>a great weekend baseball