WEBVTT - Tech News: Apple Cancels Plans for Vision Pro II

0:00:04.480 --> 0:00:12.399
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tech Stuff, a production from iHeartRadio. Hey there,

0:00:12.480 --> 0:00:16.239
<v Speaker 1>and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host, Jonathan Strickland.

0:00:16.280 --> 0:00:19.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm an executive producer with iHeart Podcasts. And how the

0:00:19.400 --> 0:00:21.759
<v Speaker 1>tech are you. It's time for the tech news for

0:00:21.800 --> 0:00:26.319
<v Speaker 1>the week ending on Friday, June twenty first, twenty twenty four.

0:00:26.880 --> 0:00:29.720
<v Speaker 1>And we've had a little shuffle this week for the

0:00:29.760 --> 0:00:34.080
<v Speaker 1>title of world's most valuable company. And by that I

0:00:34.159 --> 0:00:37.680
<v Speaker 1>mean how a company is valued based upon the number

0:00:37.760 --> 0:00:41.559
<v Speaker 1>of shares that are available and the price per share.

0:00:42.000 --> 0:00:46.080
<v Speaker 1>All the contenders are tech companies and earlier this month,

0:00:46.200 --> 0:00:51.280
<v Speaker 1>Apple toppled Microsoft after Apple held its Worldwide Developer Conference

0:00:51.320 --> 0:00:55.040
<v Speaker 1>and got investors all excited, but that victory was short lived.

0:00:55.160 --> 0:01:00.640
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft regained the throne just two days later. This week,

0:01:00.760 --> 0:01:04.440
<v Speaker 1>a new challenger pushed past Apple to take a swing

0:01:04.480 --> 0:01:08.640
<v Speaker 1>at the king that was Nvidia. Like Apple, Nvidia achieved

0:01:08.640 --> 0:01:11.760
<v Speaker 1>the title of most valuable company in the world, only

0:01:11.840 --> 0:01:15.559
<v Speaker 1>to relinquish it back to Microsoft a couple of days later.

0:01:15.800 --> 0:01:18.560
<v Speaker 1>But on June eighteenth, Nvidia was on top of the

0:01:18.600 --> 0:01:22.399
<v Speaker 1>world with a market value of three point three four

0:01:23.319 --> 0:01:29.040
<v Speaker 1>trillion dollars. Geez Louise. Anyway, since then Nvidia stock price

0:01:29.120 --> 0:01:32.080
<v Speaker 1>dipped about three point four percent, and that was enough

0:01:32.080 --> 0:01:34.720
<v Speaker 1>to give Microsoft the top spot again, even though Microsoft

0:01:34.800 --> 0:01:38.120
<v Speaker 1>had also had a smaller dip in stock value in

0:01:38.200 --> 0:01:41.440
<v Speaker 1>that same time. Now, in case you're not familiar with Nvidia,

0:01:41.680 --> 0:01:46.520
<v Speaker 1>it's a microprocessor design company. Like they make the designs

0:01:46.640 --> 0:01:51.400
<v Speaker 1>for things like, you know, microprocessors, specifically graphics processing units

0:01:51.440 --> 0:01:56.200
<v Speaker 1>or GPUs, and then other companies fabricate those designs. Recently,

0:01:56.240 --> 0:01:59.440
<v Speaker 1>in Vidia's really big business has been in designing chips

0:01:59.440 --> 0:02:01.840
<v Speaker 1>that are used by companies for the purposes of running

0:02:01.880 --> 0:02:06.160
<v Speaker 1>AI implementations. On the tech and politics front, the US

0:02:06.240 --> 0:02:09.639
<v Speaker 1>White House has banned the sale of products and services

0:02:09.680 --> 0:02:14.959
<v Speaker 1>from the Russian cybersecurity company Kispersky Labs. So Kispersky Lab

0:02:15.000 --> 0:02:18.480
<v Speaker 1>it's a huge name in the cybersecurity space. They've played

0:02:18.560 --> 0:02:22.280
<v Speaker 1>a key part in identifying and mitigating various threats across

0:02:22.320 --> 0:02:25.919
<v Speaker 1>the Internet. Kisperski also makes lots of different products, including

0:02:26.080 --> 0:02:30.519
<v Speaker 1>antivirus software. So why would the US ban it? Well,

0:02:30.960 --> 0:02:33.720
<v Speaker 1>the main concern is that the White House believes the

0:02:33.800 --> 0:02:38.840
<v Speaker 1>Russian government could and would force Kaspersky Lab to harvest

0:02:38.880 --> 0:02:42.280
<v Speaker 1>and weaponize data from other countries, you know, primarily the

0:02:42.360 --> 0:02:45.480
<v Speaker 1>United States obviously, but there's also a fear that the

0:02:45.560 --> 0:02:48.959
<v Speaker 1>Russian government could force Kisperski Lab to actually serve as

0:02:48.960 --> 0:02:52.040
<v Speaker 1>a delivery system for malware rather than as a protection

0:02:52.120 --> 0:02:56.000
<v Speaker 1>against it. Imagine being told that your antivirus software needs

0:02:56.040 --> 0:02:59.400
<v Speaker 1>to be updated, and so you update it, but secretly

0:02:59.639 --> 0:03:04.600
<v Speaker 1>it's actually delivering malware to you. That's part of the concern. Now,

0:03:04.880 --> 0:03:09.440
<v Speaker 1>Kasperski Lab has protested this ban, which makes sense, and

0:03:09.600 --> 0:03:11.760
<v Speaker 1>have said that well, this is a case where the

0:03:11.840 --> 0:03:15.960
<v Speaker 1>US government is reacting to a perceived hypothetical threat as

0:03:15.960 --> 0:03:19.240
<v Speaker 1>opposed to know an actual threat, which is a sentiment

0:03:19.360 --> 0:03:22.360
<v Speaker 1>that we may have also heard regarding the upcoming US

0:03:22.440 --> 0:03:25.120
<v Speaker 1>ban on TikTok. I'll talk more about that in just

0:03:25.160 --> 0:03:28.480
<v Speaker 1>a moment. Kasperski Lab says it will pursue all legal

0:03:28.520 --> 0:03:32.720
<v Speaker 1>avenues open to the company to push back against this ban.

0:03:33.120 --> 0:03:35.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how I feel about this one, honestly,

0:03:35.520 --> 0:03:39.280
<v Speaker 1>because I mean, Kaspersky Lab undeniably has done some amazing work,

0:03:39.520 --> 0:03:43.160
<v Speaker 1>and without their contributions, I do believe the Internet would

0:03:43.160 --> 0:03:45.760
<v Speaker 1>be a much more dangerous place than it is already.

0:03:46.400 --> 0:03:48.640
<v Speaker 1>On the flip side, I don't think there's any way

0:03:48.640 --> 0:03:52.480
<v Speaker 1>you can deny that Russia has an authoritarian government in

0:03:52.600 --> 0:03:56.360
<v Speaker 1>place with various agencies that have shown in the past

0:03:56.400 --> 0:03:59.640
<v Speaker 1>to be more than willing to put pressure on whatever

0:04:00.200 --> 0:04:03.880
<v Speaker 1>levers they have to gain an advantage. But is that

0:04:04.200 --> 0:04:07.640
<v Speaker 1>potential enough to justify a ban. If you don't have

0:04:07.680 --> 0:04:10.560
<v Speaker 1>a specific instance to point out of saying yes, this

0:04:10.800 --> 0:04:14.400
<v Speaker 1>is happening, then are you justified in banning. I don't know.

0:04:14.480 --> 0:04:16.960
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't feel good to me, but at the same

0:04:17.000 --> 0:04:19.839
<v Speaker 1>time I can understand the concern. So you could also

0:04:20.000 --> 0:04:24.000
<v Speaker 1>argue that this is really just more political posturing, that

0:04:24.080 --> 0:04:28.960
<v Speaker 1>it's the US attempting to kind of shut down an

0:04:29.040 --> 0:04:34.080
<v Speaker 1>important business that's in Russia as a way to indirectly

0:04:34.160 --> 0:04:38.080
<v Speaker 1>pressure Russia itself. I'm not smart enough to understand all

0:04:38.080 --> 0:04:40.480
<v Speaker 1>the ins and outs, so I just look at it

0:04:40.480 --> 0:04:44.760
<v Speaker 1>and think, wow, that's a big mess. Also, speaking of TikTok,

0:04:44.920 --> 0:04:48.279
<v Speaker 1>Reuter's reports that TikTok and its parent company byte Dance,

0:04:48.560 --> 0:04:52.719
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese company, have requested essentially a dismissal of the

0:04:52.800 --> 0:04:57.440
<v Speaker 1>upcoming national ban on TikTok in the US that's scheduled

0:04:57.440 --> 0:05:01.679
<v Speaker 1>to happen on January nineteenth, twenty twenty. So the argument

0:05:01.760 --> 0:05:04.960
<v Speaker 1>that TikTok is making is that despite several attempts to

0:05:05.040 --> 0:05:09.040
<v Speaker 1>negotiate a solution to the various concerns the US government

0:05:09.080 --> 0:05:13.480
<v Speaker 1>has raised regarding TikTok and its relationship to its pairing company,

0:05:13.680 --> 0:05:16.760
<v Speaker 1>the US government has refused to really engage on a

0:05:16.800 --> 0:05:20.119
<v Speaker 1>serious level since twenty twenty two. So TikTok is saying,

0:05:20.480 --> 0:05:23.480
<v Speaker 1>We've come forward in good faith in an attempt to

0:05:23.520 --> 0:05:26.680
<v Speaker 1>work this out, and the government has just roadblocked us

0:05:26.880 --> 0:05:29.960
<v Speaker 1>and then gone to a ban which doesn't seem fair.

0:05:30.320 --> 0:05:33.480
<v Speaker 1>And then also TikTok's arguing that this is a violation

0:05:33.560 --> 0:05:36.440
<v Speaker 1>of First Amendment rights as well. TikTok reps have also

0:05:36.480 --> 0:05:40.160
<v Speaker 1>claimed that divestiture from the Chinese pairing company is quote

0:05:40.360 --> 0:05:45.000
<v Speaker 1>not possible technologically, commercially, or legally end the quote. I

0:05:45.000 --> 0:05:47.599
<v Speaker 1>don't know. I feel like I need to call bs

0:05:47.640 --> 0:05:50.320
<v Speaker 1>on at least the first two of those three, simply

0:05:50.400 --> 0:05:53.560
<v Speaker 1>because we've also read reports that TikTok has quietly been

0:05:53.600 --> 0:05:58.000
<v Speaker 1>working on an alternative recommendation algorithm, which sounds like it

0:05:58.040 --> 0:06:01.440
<v Speaker 1>could be a contingency plan if this band does go through.

0:06:01.600 --> 0:06:04.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, the band hinges on TikTok's relationship to Byte

0:06:04.880 --> 0:06:08.160
<v Speaker 1>Dance and by extension, China itself. The band has said

0:06:08.200 --> 0:06:12.080
<v Speaker 1>that if TikTok were to be divested from Byte Dance,

0:06:12.440 --> 0:06:16.200
<v Speaker 1>that this band would not necessarily happen. So the fact

0:06:16.240 --> 0:06:21.200
<v Speaker 1>that TikTok has apparently been working on this alternative recommendation algorithm,

0:06:21.200 --> 0:06:25.600
<v Speaker 1>one that's distinctly independent of the version that Byte Dance

0:06:25.680 --> 0:06:30.520
<v Speaker 1>uses for say du Yan, the Chinese version of TikTok

0:06:30.640 --> 0:06:34.320
<v Speaker 1>or the Chinese you know, like close cousin of TikTok,

0:06:34.680 --> 0:06:39.400
<v Speaker 1>That to me suggests that TikTok is quietly exploring those possibilities.

0:06:39.560 --> 0:06:43.000
<v Speaker 1>But obviously the company wants to avoid having to do

0:06:43.040 --> 0:06:45.440
<v Speaker 1>that at all, and it would be better for the

0:06:45.480 --> 0:06:48.440
<v Speaker 1>company if they didn't have to go through the whole

0:06:48.440 --> 0:06:54.200
<v Speaker 1>divestiture process. As for commercially, I mean, TikTok still operates

0:06:54.279 --> 0:06:58.719
<v Speaker 1>rather independently from the other products of Byte Dance, so

0:06:59.160 --> 0:07:03.719
<v Speaker 1>I would imagine that divesting it commercially actually is entirely possible.

0:07:03.800 --> 0:07:06.159
<v Speaker 1>I mean, no one by Dance wouldn't want to do

0:07:06.240 --> 0:07:09.600
<v Speaker 1>it because TikTok makes money, so why would you want to?

0:07:09.960 --> 0:07:13.960
<v Speaker 1>But I still think it's possible. I don't think it's impossible.

0:07:14.360 --> 0:07:17.360
<v Speaker 1>That's based on my own opinion, but yeah, the legal part,

0:07:17.720 --> 0:07:21.080
<v Speaker 1>that's harder for me to answer. That's what the courts

0:07:21.120 --> 0:07:23.480
<v Speaker 1>are for. I personally have doubts that the courts are

0:07:23.480 --> 0:07:25.440
<v Speaker 1>going to reach a decision as to whether the ban

0:07:25.600 --> 0:07:28.160
<v Speaker 1>is legal or not before the deadline actually gets here,

0:07:28.480 --> 0:07:32.640
<v Speaker 1>But we'll see. Reuter's also reports that Apple has recently

0:07:32.680 --> 0:07:36.840
<v Speaker 1>switched gears and has stopped work on a successor to

0:07:36.920 --> 0:07:40.960
<v Speaker 1>the Apple Vision Pro, which is Apple's mixed reality headset.

0:07:41.440 --> 0:07:45.000
<v Speaker 1>That headset has a hefty price tag, and it's also

0:07:45.160 --> 0:07:49.120
<v Speaker 1>had a fairly slow start, which I believe mostly comes

0:07:49.160 --> 0:07:52.720
<v Speaker 1>down to two really big reasons. The first is obviously

0:07:52.800 --> 0:07:55.560
<v Speaker 1>the base cost. It is huge. It's a whopping three

0:07:56.000 --> 0:07:59.480
<v Speaker 1>five hundred dollars at the beginning, before you've done any

0:07:59.840 --> 0:08:03.200
<v Speaker 1>like upgrades or accessories or anything like that. And that's

0:08:03.240 --> 0:08:05.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot more money than most people can PLoP down

0:08:06.000 --> 0:08:09.040
<v Speaker 1>for a new tech gadget. But the other big barrier

0:08:09.440 --> 0:08:12.320
<v Speaker 1>is that development for this platform is still in its

0:08:12.440 --> 0:08:16.520
<v Speaker 1>very early days, which means there's really not that much

0:08:16.560 --> 0:08:19.920
<v Speaker 1>you can do with the darn thing. Yet every review

0:08:20.040 --> 0:08:23.400
<v Speaker 1>I have read of the Vision Pro says that it

0:08:23.440 --> 0:08:26.920
<v Speaker 1>performs really well. It's really impressive. But that outside of

0:08:26.960 --> 0:08:29.680
<v Speaker 1>the basic things you're able to do, there's just not

0:08:29.880 --> 0:08:33.040
<v Speaker 1>much there yet. And for developers, I could see why

0:08:33.080 --> 0:08:35.559
<v Speaker 1>there'd be a reluctance to jump on board because if

0:08:35.559 --> 0:08:38.680
<v Speaker 1>the installed base of potential customers is a very small one,

0:08:38.960 --> 0:08:41.720
<v Speaker 1>you might not be able to capitalize on the invested

0:08:41.800 --> 0:08:45.280
<v Speaker 1>time and energy it took to make something compelling because

0:08:45.320 --> 0:08:49.640
<v Speaker 1>there's just not enough people to pay that investment off anyway. Now,

0:08:49.720 --> 0:08:52.840
<v Speaker 1>Apple is reportedly backing away from making a true Apple

0:08:53.000 --> 0:08:56.200
<v Speaker 1>Vision Pro two or whatever they would call it, but

0:08:56.400 --> 0:08:59.280
<v Speaker 1>the company is still working on a more affordable mixed

0:08:59.280 --> 0:09:02.679
<v Speaker 1>reality headsint at that would be available before the end

0:09:02.720 --> 0:09:06.679
<v Speaker 1>of next year. Presumably such an affordable model will have

0:09:06.760 --> 0:09:09.880
<v Speaker 1>fewer features than the Vision Pro. What I find interesting

0:09:10.280 --> 0:09:12.880
<v Speaker 1>is whether or not customers will flock to a cheaper

0:09:13.000 --> 0:09:16.880
<v Speaker 1>version of this platform, or if the lack of those

0:09:17.160 --> 0:09:20.480
<v Speaker 1>certain features is going to sap away any excitement about

0:09:20.520 --> 0:09:22.840
<v Speaker 1>the technology and people won't be willing to pay for

0:09:22.880 --> 0:09:26.520
<v Speaker 1>it because you know, it'll be a cheap imitation of

0:09:26.559 --> 0:09:28.680
<v Speaker 1>the thing that came out a couple of years earlier.

0:09:29.000 --> 0:09:30.920
<v Speaker 1>If I had to make a guess, I would say

0:09:30.960 --> 0:09:33.840
<v Speaker 1>more folks would be willing to buy a less expensive

0:09:33.840 --> 0:09:37.800
<v Speaker 1>headset made by Apple, because Apple's reality distortion field is

0:09:37.840 --> 0:09:40.920
<v Speaker 1>still a thing, and maybe we would hear folks later

0:09:41.000 --> 0:09:43.959
<v Speaker 1>complain that the headset isn't as impressive as they were

0:09:44.000 --> 0:09:46.120
<v Speaker 1>led to believe, but who knows. I guess we'll find

0:09:46.120 --> 0:09:49.240
<v Speaker 1>out before the end of next year. Okay, we've got

0:09:49.320 --> 0:09:51.800
<v Speaker 1>more tech news to cover before we get to that, though,

0:09:51.880 --> 0:10:04.679
<v Speaker 1>Let's take a quick break to thank our sponsors. Ilia Sutzkev,

0:10:04.920 --> 0:10:07.400
<v Speaker 1>one of the co founders of open ai, who later

0:10:07.520 --> 0:10:09.960
<v Speaker 1>was forced to resign from the board of directors and

0:10:10.000 --> 0:10:13.720
<v Speaker 1>then a couple months later resigned completely from the company itself,

0:10:14.040 --> 0:10:17.000
<v Speaker 1>is now starting his own AI company, which is called

0:10:17.240 --> 0:10:21.400
<v Speaker 1>Safe Superintelligence, and as the name indicates, the founding principles

0:10:21.440 --> 0:10:25.000
<v Speaker 1>are similar to what inspired the initial creation of open Ai,

0:10:25.320 --> 0:10:29.160
<v Speaker 1>before that company began to embrace profit to a greater degree.

0:10:29.400 --> 0:10:32.920
<v Speaker 1>The Safe Superintelligence website says the company will have offices

0:10:32.960 --> 0:10:37.040
<v Speaker 1>in Palo Alto, California, and Tel Aviv. Sutzkever posted on

0:10:37.360 --> 0:10:39.640
<v Speaker 1>x that the plan is for the company to focus

0:10:39.920 --> 0:10:43.320
<v Speaker 1>entirely on the safe development and deployment of AI, without

0:10:43.320 --> 0:10:46.760
<v Speaker 1>regard to stuff like market forces and trends and things

0:10:46.880 --> 0:10:49.840
<v Speaker 1>like that how he's going to achieve that remains to

0:10:49.880 --> 0:10:54.240
<v Speaker 1>be seen because AI development is a really expensive thing.

0:10:54.720 --> 0:10:57.400
<v Speaker 1>In fact, that's why open Ai launched a for profit

0:10:57.520 --> 0:11:00.440
<v Speaker 1>arm in the first place. But I do think it's

0:11:00.440 --> 0:11:03.080
<v Speaker 1>a lofty goal to aim for. I just don't know

0:11:03.120 --> 0:11:07.480
<v Speaker 1>how achievable it is. AI company Anthropic has unveiled the

0:11:07.600 --> 0:11:11.720
<v Speaker 1>Claude three point five Sonnet AI language model this week.

0:11:11.920 --> 0:11:15.080
<v Speaker 1>In fact, I've already started seeing ads online for this thing.

0:11:15.520 --> 0:11:17.920
<v Speaker 1>The model can do pretty much all the things we

0:11:18.000 --> 0:11:21.640
<v Speaker 1>associate with chatbots built on generative AI. You know. It

0:11:21.640 --> 0:11:24.480
<v Speaker 1>can respond to prompts, it can write code, it can

0:11:24.559 --> 0:11:28.719
<v Speaker 1>analyze text. According to Ours Technica's Binge Edwards, it can

0:11:28.760 --> 0:11:31.640
<v Speaker 1>be really difficult to compare different AI models to each

0:11:31.679 --> 0:11:34.720
<v Speaker 1>other for various reasons. But that being said, Claude three

0:11:34.720 --> 0:11:38.200
<v Speaker 1>point five Sonnet seems to perform pretty well impressively so.

0:11:38.559 --> 0:11:40.760
<v Speaker 1>In fact, now I haven't used it yet, but then

0:11:40.880 --> 0:11:43.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't use any AI models on a regular basis.

0:11:43.800 --> 0:11:46.320
<v Speaker 1>I've only dipped my toe in goofy ways to see

0:11:46.320 --> 0:11:48.640
<v Speaker 1>what kind of response I can get for silly queries.

0:11:48.920 --> 0:11:52.360
<v Speaker 1>But for those of y'all who are either researching AI

0:11:52.960 --> 0:11:55.760
<v Speaker 1>or occasionally making use of AI. It might be something

0:11:55.760 --> 0:11:57.560
<v Speaker 1>you want to check out just to see if it

0:11:57.720 --> 0:12:02.000
<v Speaker 1>gives you better responses than alternatives on the market. Back

0:12:02.000 --> 0:12:05.199
<v Speaker 1>to Reuters, which reports that Amazon is looking to monetize

0:12:05.240 --> 0:12:08.840
<v Speaker 1>its Alexa service soon. The plan, which is code named Banyan,

0:12:09.280 --> 0:12:12.679
<v Speaker 1>is to introduce a more advanced version of the Alexa assistant,

0:12:12.760 --> 0:12:17.440
<v Speaker 1>capable of holding generative AI conversations with users. Access to

0:12:17.559 --> 0:12:21.000
<v Speaker 1>this level of Alexa will actually require a monthly fee

0:12:21.000 --> 0:12:23.839
<v Speaker 1>somewhere in the neighborhood of five dollars a month. The

0:12:24.000 --> 0:12:27.200
<v Speaker 1>report says that Amazon is given developers until August to

0:12:27.240 --> 0:12:30.559
<v Speaker 1>get this version of Alexa ready, though that doesn't necessarily

0:12:30.600 --> 0:12:33.400
<v Speaker 1>tell us when such a service would actually launch. I

0:12:33.480 --> 0:12:36.040
<v Speaker 1>honestly don't know if this is going to work from

0:12:36.040 --> 0:12:39.679
<v Speaker 1>a commercial standpoint. I'm not sure most folks care if

0:12:39.720 --> 0:12:43.600
<v Speaker 1>their personal assistant is generating a conversation or just pulling

0:12:43.679 --> 0:12:47.199
<v Speaker 1>something directly off the web to answer various questions. That's

0:12:47.600 --> 0:12:50.160
<v Speaker 1>possibly due to the fact that as I get older,

0:12:50.200 --> 0:12:52.520
<v Speaker 1>I see fewer reasons for me to use tools like

0:12:52.559 --> 0:12:56.080
<v Speaker 1>this for anything beyond really basic stuff like, you know,

0:12:56.200 --> 0:12:58.760
<v Speaker 1>asking for an update on the weather or whatever, which

0:12:58.800 --> 0:13:01.480
<v Speaker 1>is like ninety nine times out of one hundred, if

0:13:01.480 --> 0:13:07.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm asking my smart assistant speaker for something, it's to

0:13:07.520 --> 0:13:10.240
<v Speaker 1>give me an update on whether. Other times it's to

0:13:10.480 --> 0:13:13.280
<v Speaker 1>play music so that my dog can listen to music

0:13:13.360 --> 0:13:16.080
<v Speaker 1>while I'm leaving the house. The rare occasions I do

0:13:16.160 --> 0:13:18.920
<v Speaker 1>that or to ask if certain fruits are safe for

0:13:18.960 --> 0:13:21.120
<v Speaker 1>dogs to eat. Those are like my three go tos.

0:13:21.559 --> 0:13:24.800
<v Speaker 1>But Amazon's trying to find a way to make Alexa moneymaker,

0:13:24.880 --> 0:13:27.960
<v Speaker 1>and maybe this will work out for them. I personally

0:13:28.000 --> 0:13:30.200
<v Speaker 1>have my doubts. I think a lot of people will say,

0:13:30.240 --> 0:13:32.120
<v Speaker 1>why am I going to pay for something that previously

0:13:32.160 --> 0:13:34.440
<v Speaker 1>I got to use for free, even if the new

0:13:34.559 --> 0:13:39.120
<v Speaker 1>version is at least in theory better. Meta has reorganized

0:13:39.160 --> 0:13:42.080
<v Speaker 1>its Reality Labs division. A quick reminder, this is the

0:13:42.280 --> 0:13:46.240
<v Speaker 1>part of Meta formerly Facebook that is tasked with bringing

0:13:46.280 --> 0:13:49.080
<v Speaker 1>the metaverse into reality, whether people want it or not.

0:13:49.440 --> 0:13:52.559
<v Speaker 1>It's the division that Meta has dedicated billions of dollars

0:13:52.559 --> 0:13:55.280
<v Speaker 1>to in that effort, which is something that has concerned

0:13:55.320 --> 0:13:58.719
<v Speaker 1>many investors in that company. But anyway, this reorg has

0:13:58.720 --> 0:14:02.800
<v Speaker 1>divided Reality Labs into two major organizations, one that will

0:14:02.800 --> 0:14:05.640
<v Speaker 1>focus on wearables and the other that will focus on

0:14:05.840 --> 0:14:09.160
<v Speaker 1>the metaverse. So wearables are things like the Quest VR

0:14:09.240 --> 0:14:13.400
<v Speaker 1>headsets and the ray Band smart glasses. The Verge reports

0:14:13.440 --> 0:14:15.920
<v Speaker 1>that the reorganization also meant the company laid off a

0:14:16.000 --> 0:14:19.160
<v Speaker 1>quote unquote small number of employees, although I haven't seen

0:14:19.200 --> 0:14:22.520
<v Speaker 1>any sources that give more detail as to how much

0:14:22.600 --> 0:14:26.400
<v Speaker 1>a small number actually is. Bloomberg reports that Elon Musk

0:14:26.440 --> 0:14:29.280
<v Speaker 1>is pushing hard to get an X payment service launched

0:14:29.560 --> 0:14:31.920
<v Speaker 1>before the end of this year. You might recall that

0:14:32.000 --> 0:14:34.480
<v Speaker 1>one thing Musk wanted to do with Twitter, apart from

0:14:34.520 --> 0:14:36.800
<v Speaker 1>opening it up to folks who had previously been banned

0:14:36.800 --> 0:14:40.320
<v Speaker 1>from the platform for violating various policies, was to convert

0:14:40.320 --> 0:14:43.320
<v Speaker 1>it into sort of an everything app, an app where

0:14:43.360 --> 0:14:46.520
<v Speaker 1>you could chat with friends, post to the general population,

0:14:46.920 --> 0:14:50.240
<v Speaker 1>shop for goods and services, and pay for stuff like

0:14:50.480 --> 0:14:54.000
<v Speaker 1>transfer money, all from one app. The payment service thing

0:14:54.160 --> 0:14:56.760
<v Speaker 1>is part of this overall puzzle, and one that Musk

0:14:56.800 --> 0:14:59.720
<v Speaker 1>has aggressively pushed for this year. To that end, X

0:14:59.800 --> 0:15:04.040
<v Speaker 1>has secured payment transmitter licenses with twenty eight states here

0:15:04.040 --> 0:15:06.520
<v Speaker 1>in the US, by the company's goals to secure such

0:15:06.560 --> 0:15:09.280
<v Speaker 1>licenses for every state by the end of the year.

0:15:09.640 --> 0:15:11.840
<v Speaker 1>It sounds to me like this is really a matter

0:15:11.960 --> 0:15:15.080
<v Speaker 1>of when not if, and at some point we will

0:15:15.080 --> 0:15:18.360
<v Speaker 1>see the X payment services roll out, possibly with many

0:15:18.360 --> 0:15:21.360
<v Speaker 1>other features to follow. Must's goal is to get users

0:15:21.360 --> 0:15:24.440
<v Speaker 1>to rely on X for financial transactions and to store

0:15:24.520 --> 0:15:28.120
<v Speaker 1>their money in high yield savings accounts, which might work.

0:15:28.160 --> 0:15:30.880
<v Speaker 1>It might actually entice people who have so far either

0:15:31.280 --> 0:15:34.520
<v Speaker 1>stayed off of the platform for various reasons or who

0:15:34.600 --> 0:15:37.640
<v Speaker 1>left due to similar reasons, and to have them come

0:15:37.680 --> 0:15:40.000
<v Speaker 1>back and jump in and order not to lose out

0:15:40.040 --> 0:15:42.600
<v Speaker 1>on an opportunity. However, I think it's safe to say

0:15:42.600 --> 0:15:45.080
<v Speaker 1>that skeptics like myself, you know, folks who have seen

0:15:45.160 --> 0:15:48.560
<v Speaker 1>Musk apply the ban hammer on X in a very

0:15:48.600 --> 0:15:52.760
<v Speaker 1>mercurial way, are less eager to put our money into

0:15:52.760 --> 0:15:56.760
<v Speaker 1>a platform where the owner has been shown to be unpredictable, temperamental,

0:15:56.840 --> 0:16:01.320
<v Speaker 1>perhaps unreliable is another good word. I just I think

0:16:01.320 --> 0:16:04.280
<v Speaker 1>it would be very risky to do personally. That's my

0:16:04.320 --> 0:16:07.720
<v Speaker 1>own opinion though, so you know, if you don't value

0:16:07.720 --> 0:16:09.960
<v Speaker 1>my opinion. One, I don't know why you're listening, but

0:16:10.000 --> 0:16:12.800
<v Speaker 1>thank you anyway, And two, yeah, do you don't make

0:16:12.840 --> 0:16:15.200
<v Speaker 1>your own decisions? It's totally cool if you happen to

0:16:15.240 --> 0:16:18.320
<v Speaker 1>live near Dallas, Texas or King of Prussia, Pennsylvania. I

0:16:18.400 --> 0:16:20.920
<v Speaker 1>have a homework assignment for you. Don't worry. It's not

0:16:20.960 --> 0:16:23.560
<v Speaker 1>coming up anytime soon. It'll be next year, but it's

0:16:23.600 --> 0:16:27.160
<v Speaker 1>to visit either of the two Netflix House venues that

0:16:27.200 --> 0:16:30.840
<v Speaker 1>are opening up in the upcoming months. They're slated to

0:16:30.960 --> 0:16:34.400
<v Speaker 1>open in twenty twenty five. Netflix first announced the intent

0:16:34.440 --> 0:16:37.400
<v Speaker 1>to debut some brick and mortar locations, and now we

0:16:37.560 --> 0:16:40.760
<v Speaker 1>know where those first two are going to be. Dallas, Texas,

0:16:41.000 --> 0:16:43.920
<v Speaker 1>King of Prussia, Pennsylvania. They'll be taking over the spaces

0:16:43.920 --> 0:16:47.240
<v Speaker 1>of former department stores and shopping centers, which I don't know.

0:16:47.280 --> 0:16:50.360
<v Speaker 1>Maybe that'll breathe some new life into malls. I haven't

0:16:50.400 --> 0:16:52.840
<v Speaker 1>been to a mall in years, but in fact, the

0:16:53.040 --> 0:16:54.920
<v Speaker 1>place where I used to go when I was a

0:16:55.000 --> 0:16:57.840
<v Speaker 1>kid is now essentially vacant. I think there's like only

0:16:57.880 --> 0:17:00.160
<v Speaker 1>a handful of stores that are still open and everything

0:17:00.200 --> 0:17:02.760
<v Speaker 1>else is closed down, which, as I understand, it is

0:17:02.800 --> 0:17:05.800
<v Speaker 1>not that unusual today. But then I don't ever leave

0:17:05.840 --> 0:17:08.119
<v Speaker 1>the house, So what do I know anyway? What's going

0:17:08.160 --> 0:17:11.800
<v Speaker 1>to go on in these Netflix houses beats me. Netflix

0:17:11.840 --> 0:17:13.840
<v Speaker 1>has not shared a whole lot of information. They have

0:17:13.960 --> 0:17:17.440
<v Speaker 1>said that there will be themed experiences as well as

0:17:17.440 --> 0:17:21.359
<v Speaker 1>some special food and drink offerings, and that presumably these

0:17:21.400 --> 0:17:25.640
<v Speaker 1>are going to draw inspiration from original Netflix films and series.

0:17:25.880 --> 0:17:27.960
<v Speaker 1>And when I think back to some of those originals

0:17:28.040 --> 0:17:30.680
<v Speaker 1>on Netflix, I'm not convinced I really want to experience

0:17:30.720 --> 0:17:35.080
<v Speaker 1>that stuff myself in real life, but I am definitely curious,

0:17:35.160 --> 0:17:36.960
<v Speaker 1>and heck, maybe I'll go to the King of Presha

0:17:37.000 --> 0:17:39.879
<v Speaker 1>one because my partner has family up in that area,

0:17:40.080 --> 0:17:41.920
<v Speaker 1>So maybe if we're happy to be there, I'll be like, hey,

0:17:41.960 --> 0:17:44.880
<v Speaker 1>let's go see what this is all about. The two

0:17:44.960 --> 0:17:47.960
<v Speaker 1>astronauts who recently journeyed to the International Space Station aboard

0:17:47.960 --> 0:17:51.480
<v Speaker 1>a Boeing Starliner spacecraft are staying a little bit longer

0:17:51.520 --> 0:17:54.520
<v Speaker 1>than they had planned. This is because the Starliner experienced

0:17:54.520 --> 0:17:57.600
<v Speaker 1>some technical issues that engineers really want to review further

0:17:57.720 --> 0:18:00.719
<v Speaker 1>before bringing the astronauts back home in the spacecraft on

0:18:00.800 --> 0:18:03.840
<v Speaker 1>June twenty six. So, during the trip to the ISS,

0:18:03.880 --> 0:18:06.760
<v Speaker 1>the star Liner had a few helium leaks, like five

0:18:06.800 --> 0:18:10.639
<v Speaker 1>of them. Now, helium itself is non toxic, it's non flammable,

0:18:10.800 --> 0:18:12.600
<v Speaker 1>so as long as the leaks weren't bad enough to

0:18:12.640 --> 0:18:17.439
<v Speaker 1>displace oxygen and cause asphyxiation, then the astronauts were deemed

0:18:17.480 --> 0:18:20.399
<v Speaker 1>to be safe. Then five of the twenty eight reaction

0:18:20.520 --> 0:18:23.520
<v Speaker 1>control system thrusters on the star Liner also failed as

0:18:23.560 --> 0:18:26.639
<v Speaker 1>the spacecraft was nearing the iss. It's not exactly the

0:18:26.680 --> 0:18:28.520
<v Speaker 1>sort of thing you want to chance when you're bringing

0:18:28.520 --> 0:18:31.119
<v Speaker 1>folks back home, as these thrusters play a part in

0:18:31.359 --> 0:18:35.520
<v Speaker 1>orienting the spacecraft properly upon re entry. NASA reps have

0:18:35.560 --> 0:18:38.439
<v Speaker 1>said the agency wants to review the test spacecraft's issues

0:18:38.480 --> 0:18:41.720
<v Speaker 1>before signing off on future missions, which makes perfect sense

0:18:41.720 --> 0:18:45.520
<v Speaker 1>to me. Okay, some quick reading recommendations for y'all. Mickey

0:18:45.560 --> 0:18:48.280
<v Speaker 1>Carroll has a piece for sky News titled self driving

0:18:48.320 --> 0:18:51.119
<v Speaker 1>cars found to be safer except at dawn, dusk, or

0:18:51.160 --> 0:18:54.480
<v Speaker 1>when turning according to a study. I recommend reading that

0:18:54.560 --> 0:18:56.359
<v Speaker 1>it's one of the biggest selling points for R and

0:18:56.440 --> 0:18:58.800
<v Speaker 1>D and self driving vehicles. This idea that you know,

0:18:58.920 --> 0:19:01.480
<v Speaker 1>ideally they would be fre safer on the roads than

0:19:01.600 --> 0:19:04.040
<v Speaker 1>vehicles that were driven by human beings. But as this

0:19:04.160 --> 0:19:07.399
<v Speaker 1>study points out, there are still scenarios in which AI

0:19:07.520 --> 0:19:10.919
<v Speaker 1>powered vehicles are more prone to accidents, and obviously that

0:19:11.000 --> 0:19:14.480
<v Speaker 1>shines a spotlight on areas where engineers need to improve safety.

0:19:14.840 --> 0:19:17.000
<v Speaker 1>Next up is a piece by Mike Masnik at tech

0:19:17.080 --> 0:19:20.040
<v Speaker 1>Dirt titled five hundred thousand books have been deleted from

0:19:20.040 --> 0:19:23.199
<v Speaker 1>the Internet Archives Lending Library. I talked a little bit

0:19:23.240 --> 0:19:25.240
<v Speaker 1>about this when I did an episode about the Internet

0:19:25.320 --> 0:19:28.280
<v Speaker 1>Archive recently, but this piece dives into how publishers have

0:19:28.359 --> 0:19:32.000
<v Speaker 1>leveraged their considerable power to deny the archive access to

0:19:32.119 --> 0:19:35.920
<v Speaker 1>library copies of various works. And last up is a

0:19:35.960 --> 0:19:40.119
<v Speaker 1>piece by Ashley Bellinger of Ours Technica titled lawsuit Meta

0:19:40.200 --> 0:19:43.840
<v Speaker 1>engineer told to resign after calling out sexist hiring practices.

0:19:44.119 --> 0:19:46.720
<v Speaker 1>This article details the claims made by a former Meta

0:19:46.720 --> 0:19:49.680
<v Speaker 1>employee who says the company retaliated against him after he

0:19:49.760 --> 0:19:53.280
<v Speaker 1>brought forward concerns and misogynistic practices in the company. All

0:19:53.280 --> 0:19:55.760
<v Speaker 1>of those are well worth your time to read. That's

0:19:55.800 --> 0:19:58.600
<v Speaker 1>it for this week. I hope you are all well

0:19:58.960 --> 0:20:01.400
<v Speaker 1>and I will talk to you again again really soon.

0:20:07.920 --> 0:20:12.560
<v Speaker 1>Tech Stuff is an iHeartRadio production. For more podcasts from iHeartRadio,

0:20:12.920 --> 0:20:16.639
<v Speaker 1>visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen

0:20:16.640 --> 0:20:17.719
<v Speaker 1>to your favorite shows.