WEBVTT - Daybreak Weekend: Fed Decision, Scotland Trip, China PMI

0:00:00.240 --> 0:00:07.720
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News.

0:00:10.119 --> 0:00:12.520
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg day Break Weekend, our global look at

0:00:12.560 --> 0:00:15.000
<v Speaker 2>the top stories in the coming week from our Daybreak

0:00:15.040 --> 0:00:17.600
<v Speaker 2>anchors all around the world, and straight ahead on the program,

0:00:17.680 --> 0:00:20.800
<v Speaker 2>well look ahead to this week's monetary policy decision from

0:00:20.800 --> 0:00:24.680
<v Speaker 2>the Fed. Also earnings for more of text Magnificent seven.

0:00:24.960 --> 0:00:26.479
<v Speaker 2>I'm Tom Busby in New York.

0:00:26.640 --> 0:00:29.200
<v Speaker 3>I'm callin Hepget in London, where we're asking if President

0:00:29.320 --> 0:00:32.879
<v Speaker 3>Charump's Scottish golf trip can yield any political wins.

0:00:33.000 --> 0:00:35.839
<v Speaker 4>I'm got Prisner looking at the Chinese economy ahead of

0:00:35.920 --> 0:00:38.080
<v Speaker 4>fresh PMI reports in the coming week.

0:00:38.400 --> 0:00:42.440
<v Speaker 1>That's all straight ahead on Bloomberg Daybreak Weekend on Bloomberg

0:00:42.479 --> 0:00:46.160
<v Speaker 1>eleven three zero, New York, Bloomberg ninety nine to one, Washington, DC,

0:00:46.680 --> 0:00:50.920
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg ninety two to nine, Boston, DAB Digital Radio, London,

0:00:51.360 --> 0:00:54.560
<v Speaker 1>Sirius XM one twenty one, and around the world on

0:00:54.600 --> 0:00:57.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio, dot Com and the Bloomberg Business app.

0:01:02.520 --> 0:01:03.000
<v Speaker 5>Good day to you.

0:01:03.120 --> 0:01:05.400
<v Speaker 2>I'm Tom Busby, and we begin today's program with this

0:01:05.440 --> 0:01:09.680
<v Speaker 2>week's Federal Reserve policy meeting. The Federal issue its latest

0:01:09.680 --> 0:01:12.600
<v Speaker 2>decision on interest rates on Wednesday, with a press conference

0:01:12.640 --> 0:01:16.520
<v Speaker 2>expected from FED chair Jay Powell to follow what will

0:01:16.560 --> 0:01:19.880
<v Speaker 2>the Fed decide and what's behind the central banks thinking?

0:01:19.920 --> 0:01:22.959
<v Speaker 2>And for more. We're joined by Edward Harrison, senior editor

0:01:22.959 --> 0:01:27.400
<v Speaker 2>at Bloomberg, author of Bloomberg's Everything Risk newsletter. Well, Edward,

0:01:27.480 --> 0:01:31.200
<v Speaker 2>a critical decision from the Fed. What are you expecting

0:01:31.200 --> 0:01:32.559
<v Speaker 2>to see happen this week?

0:01:33.000 --> 0:01:36.040
<v Speaker 6>Hey, Tom? Yes, it is a critical decision because of

0:01:36.080 --> 0:01:39.800
<v Speaker 6>the political pressure that we've seen applied to the Federal Reserve.

0:01:40.640 --> 0:01:44.680
<v Speaker 6>The market widely expects interest rates to stay the same,

0:01:44.800 --> 0:01:49.880
<v Speaker 6>in particular because we haven't implemented the final round of

0:01:49.920 --> 0:01:53.280
<v Speaker 6>tariffs yet, we don't know how the economy's going to

0:01:53.320 --> 0:01:56.240
<v Speaker 6>react to that. If you look at the pricing from

0:01:56.520 --> 0:02:00.440
<v Speaker 6>the market, it's expecting not just this meeting to be

0:02:00.480 --> 0:02:04.960
<v Speaker 6>the same. But there's only a slight chance, maybe a

0:02:05.040 --> 0:02:08.240
<v Speaker 6>sixty percent chance that we get a cut in September.

0:02:08.360 --> 0:02:11.640
<v Speaker 6>It's first in October when the next rate cut will come.

0:02:11.840 --> 0:02:14.920
<v Speaker 2>Wow, that's well, that's a change. But Chairman Palth has

0:02:14.960 --> 0:02:17.320
<v Speaker 2>said time and again he has said it's all about

0:02:17.320 --> 0:02:19.639
<v Speaker 2>the data and that the Central Bank has to see

0:02:19.639 --> 0:02:22.760
<v Speaker 2>the impact of the Trump tariffs on inflation. So it

0:02:22.800 --> 0:02:24.600
<v Speaker 2>really is too soon to make a move because we

0:02:24.760 --> 0:02:27.800
<v Speaker 2>just don't know. There's so many moving parts with these tariffs. Correct.

0:02:28.760 --> 0:02:30.919
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, and you know, the interesting bit is is when

0:02:31.000 --> 0:02:35.480
<v Speaker 6>the Fed actually moved to lower interest rates in twenty

0:02:35.600 --> 0:02:39.880
<v Speaker 6>twenty four, the market's reaction was that this took all

0:02:39.960 --> 0:02:43.000
<v Speaker 6>of the risk of a recession off the table, so

0:02:43.120 --> 0:02:47.440
<v Speaker 6>much so that interest rates actually went up. So they

0:02:47.680 --> 0:02:51.600
<v Speaker 6>lowered the short term interest rates, but they yields on

0:02:51.800 --> 0:02:56.480
<v Speaker 6>longer term bonds, the ones that actually matter to people

0:02:56.480 --> 0:02:58.680
<v Speaker 6>when they're getting a mortgage and so forth, those are

0:02:58.680 --> 0:03:01.600
<v Speaker 6>the ones that went up. And so it was because

0:03:02.000 --> 0:03:06.240
<v Speaker 6>the recession risk receded that you actually had a situation

0:03:06.320 --> 0:03:09.320
<v Speaker 6>where the Fed was acting one way and long term

0:03:09.400 --> 0:03:12.080
<v Speaker 6>yields went the actual opposite direction.

0:03:13.000 --> 0:03:15.120
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think you know on Wall Street we have

0:03:15.160 --> 0:03:17.600
<v Speaker 2>seen the major averages add or near all time highs

0:03:17.600 --> 0:03:20.720
<v Speaker 2>the last few weeks. Inflation still above the Fed's target,

0:03:20.800 --> 0:03:23.960
<v Speaker 2>but it has eased about two point seven percent, the

0:03:24.120 --> 0:03:28.680
<v Speaker 2>labor market, resilient, jobless rate, four percent initial jobs. Everything

0:03:28.760 --> 0:03:33.200
<v Speaker 2>is working. The Fed's plans have been working. So the

0:03:33.360 --> 0:03:35.840
<v Speaker 2>argument could be, well, why not lower interest rates, But

0:03:35.840 --> 0:03:38.560
<v Speaker 2>there's a very good reason why they wouldn't correct just

0:03:38.600 --> 0:03:41.600
<v Speaker 2>for that reason you were talking about with long term yields.

0:03:41.440 --> 0:03:45.520
<v Speaker 6>Right exactly. They just they don't know if, for instance,

0:03:45.640 --> 0:03:49.320
<v Speaker 6>they were to lower interest rates whether or not, suddenly

0:03:49.720 --> 0:03:52.600
<v Speaker 6>we would get inflation coming back in, not just because

0:03:53.120 --> 0:03:58.160
<v Speaker 6>the tariffs created more inflation, but actually because the economy

0:03:58.200 --> 0:04:01.440
<v Speaker 6>was running hot enough to create inflation on its own.

0:04:01.480 --> 0:04:03.800
<v Speaker 6>And then suddenly they'd be in a situation where they

0:04:03.840 --> 0:04:07.360
<v Speaker 6>made an error and that error would be taken on

0:04:07.480 --> 0:04:13.200
<v Speaker 6>by markets to increase interest rates, increase yields across the curve,

0:04:13.520 --> 0:04:17.279
<v Speaker 6>expecting the Fed to eventually have to undo that error.

0:04:17.600 --> 0:04:21.720
<v Speaker 6>And this is the dilemma that they faced. So they've decided, look,

0:04:21.760 --> 0:04:23.520
<v Speaker 6>you know, we're in a good enough position at this

0:04:23.560 --> 0:04:28.600
<v Speaker 6>point in time that we can actually wait to do this.

0:04:28.960 --> 0:04:31.200
<v Speaker 6>You know what's interesting if you look at the last

0:04:31.240 --> 0:04:35.400
<v Speaker 6>FED decision, they released a summary of economic projections and

0:04:35.520 --> 0:04:38.400
<v Speaker 6>sort of a by and modal distribution, there are actually

0:04:38.680 --> 0:04:43.000
<v Speaker 6>seven of the Fed governors and presidents who think that

0:04:43.040 --> 0:04:46.960
<v Speaker 6>they shouldn't lower interest rates at all this year, whereas

0:04:47.360 --> 0:04:50.440
<v Speaker 6>nine think that they should lower them two times this year.

0:04:50.440 --> 0:04:53.839
<v Speaker 6>And there are four others that are in there, but

0:04:54.080 --> 0:04:57.800
<v Speaker 6>you know the total number that the reason that we

0:04:57.880 --> 0:05:01.400
<v Speaker 6>have an expectation for two interest rates. It's being lowered

0:05:01.640 --> 0:05:04.400
<v Speaker 6>is because of those I think it's eight FED members

0:05:04.440 --> 0:05:07.279
<v Speaker 6>who believe that interest rate should be lowered by two,

0:05:07.320 --> 0:05:10.240
<v Speaker 6>but they are a decent number who think, you know,

0:05:10.279 --> 0:05:12.240
<v Speaker 6>there shouldn't be any interest rate cuts this year.

0:05:12.680 --> 0:05:15.440
<v Speaker 2>And there's been a lot of pressure, obviously from President

0:05:15.480 --> 0:05:17.920
<v Speaker 2>Trump on Jerome Palell, a lot of criticism, a lot

0:05:17.960 --> 0:05:20.880
<v Speaker 2>of pressure about what the FED is going to do.

0:05:21.120 --> 0:05:24.240
<v Speaker 2>And it goes into what you just said, He's not

0:05:24.279 --> 0:05:26.280
<v Speaker 2>the only one designing. I mean, there are twelve voting

0:05:26.320 --> 0:05:29.400
<v Speaker 2>members of the FOMC. You have all these other governors

0:05:29.440 --> 0:05:31.960
<v Speaker 2>and vice presidents and presidents of banks. I mean, it

0:05:32.040 --> 0:05:33.839
<v Speaker 2>is not a unilateral decision, is it.

0:05:34.120 --> 0:05:37.520
<v Speaker 6>No, it's not. And the interesting thing about that bimodal

0:05:37.560 --> 0:05:42.200
<v Speaker 6>distribution is that obviously we don't know which of the

0:05:42.440 --> 0:05:47.560
<v Speaker 6>nineteen dots in this summary are of voting members, but

0:05:47.800 --> 0:05:52.760
<v Speaker 6>there are enough members that if the data turned towards

0:05:52.760 --> 0:05:57.240
<v Speaker 6>the more inflationary side, you could get the FOMC outside

0:05:57.279 --> 0:06:00.920
<v Speaker 6>of Jerome Pale saying no, we don't even want two

0:06:01.040 --> 0:06:03.839
<v Speaker 6>interest rate cuts this year. We want one and perhaps

0:06:03.920 --> 0:06:08.200
<v Speaker 6>even zero. Because all it takes is us to get

0:06:08.320 --> 0:06:12.120
<v Speaker 6>three more dots up into that number, you know, to

0:06:12.160 --> 0:06:15.000
<v Speaker 6>go from seven to ten, and then suddenly we don't

0:06:15.040 --> 0:06:18.039
<v Speaker 6>have any interest rate cuts at all in twenty twenty five.

0:06:18.240 --> 0:06:20.240
<v Speaker 2>Well, the FETCH two day policy meeting kicks off this

0:06:20.360 --> 0:06:24.080
<v Speaker 2>Tuesday at Decision Wednesday, expected at two pm Wall Street time. Then,

0:06:24.120 --> 0:06:26.479
<v Speaker 2>of course we're going to hear from fedchair Jerome Powell.

0:06:26.800 --> 0:06:29.840
<v Speaker 2>Our thanks to Edward Harrison, senior editor at Bloomberg, author

0:06:29.880 --> 0:06:34.880
<v Speaker 2>of Bloomberg's Everything Risk newsletter. We move next to corporate earning.

0:06:34.960 --> 0:06:37.920
<v Speaker 2>Some of the Magnificent seven's biggest names reporting this week

0:06:38.040 --> 0:06:41.960
<v Speaker 2>meta platforms, Microsoft, Apple, and Amazon, and for more on

0:06:42.000 --> 0:06:46.000
<v Speaker 2>what to expect. We're joined by Mandeep Singh, Bloomberg Intelligence,

0:06:46.200 --> 0:06:49.440
<v Speaker 2>senior tech industry analysts. Man Deep, thank you so much

0:06:49.440 --> 0:06:52.359
<v Speaker 2>for being here. I want to start though, by looking backward,

0:06:52.480 --> 0:06:54.919
<v Speaker 2>because last week we got the latest results from Tesla

0:06:55.279 --> 0:06:59.719
<v Speaker 2>and Alphabet, very different results. Tesla miss earnings, sales fell

0:07:00.680 --> 0:07:04.359
<v Speaker 2>difficult times ahead what Alphabet. There was a real upside surprise,

0:07:04.440 --> 0:07:04.920
<v Speaker 2>wasn't there.

0:07:05.240 --> 0:07:08.560
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, And also going into earnings, I think the narrative

0:07:08.839 --> 0:07:13.560
<v Speaker 7>was that Google Search has been under a lot of

0:07:13.920 --> 0:07:17.720
<v Speaker 7>competitive threat from the likes of Chat GPT and just

0:07:18.320 --> 0:07:21.960
<v Speaker 7>what's going on in the LLM space and the numbers

0:07:22.080 --> 0:07:25.880
<v Speaker 7>proved otherwise, I mean the fact that Google grow search

0:07:26.160 --> 0:07:29.800
<v Speaker 7>double digits at a run rate of two hundred ten

0:07:29.880 --> 0:07:33.200
<v Speaker 7>billion dollars. That just goes to show you know, how

0:07:33.280 --> 0:07:37.840
<v Speaker 7>much momentum they have in terms of just their integrating

0:07:37.960 --> 0:07:42.960
<v Speaker 7>Gemini with their search page. So AI overviews has actually

0:07:43.520 --> 0:07:47.640
<v Speaker 7>helped you know, the number of queries. And then the monetization,

0:07:47.800 --> 0:07:52.280
<v Speaker 7>I mean ad monetization for Google is really, you know,

0:07:52.360 --> 0:07:55.000
<v Speaker 7>something that no one else has been able to even

0:07:55.080 --> 0:07:57.760
<v Speaker 7>come close to. And look, we're talking about Meta coming

0:07:57.840 --> 0:08:00.360
<v Speaker 7>up as well. So to me, what what will be

0:08:00.360 --> 0:08:05.360
<v Speaker 7>interesting is whether Meta shows you know, high teens or

0:08:05.440 --> 0:08:09.080
<v Speaker 7>twenty percent plus growth, because that's the sort of expectation

0:08:09.280 --> 0:08:11.800
<v Speaker 7>Google has set up with its print. You know, YouTube

0:08:11.800 --> 0:08:16.240
<v Speaker 7>did really well. In fact, YouTube plus cloud is almost

0:08:16.280 --> 0:08:19.760
<v Speaker 7>one hundred and fifteen billion dollars rundrate growing at over

0:08:19.840 --> 0:08:23.760
<v Speaker 7>twenty percent, and so a lot of positives in that

0:08:23.840 --> 0:08:26.120
<v Speaker 7>Google print. The one thing I would call out is

0:08:26.120 --> 0:08:29.600
<v Speaker 7>a capex pense. So Google ded raise their capex by

0:08:29.680 --> 0:08:32.760
<v Speaker 7>ten billion for this year, and they said twenty twenty

0:08:32.800 --> 0:08:36.040
<v Speaker 7>six would be another growth year for capex and that

0:08:37.160 --> 0:08:40.839
<v Speaker 7>some investors could say would be a Dragon free cash flow,

0:08:41.080 --> 0:08:43.480
<v Speaker 7>But I would compare that to a Meta which has

0:08:43.559 --> 0:08:48.160
<v Speaker 7>already guided to a higher CAPEX and they are not

0:08:48.480 --> 0:08:52.040
<v Speaker 7>monetizing at the same level as Google is with their

0:08:52.080 --> 0:08:54.720
<v Speaker 7>cloud business. So that is where it'd be interesting to

0:08:54.760 --> 0:08:59.199
<v Speaker 7>see how the market reacts to Meta talking up capex

0:08:59.200 --> 0:09:01.040
<v Speaker 7>for second half twenty twenty six.

0:09:01.640 --> 0:09:04.640
<v Speaker 2>Another horse in this race Microsoft, Yeah, which you know

0:09:04.880 --> 0:09:08.720
<v Speaker 2>with their open AI commitments and still expected to see

0:09:08.760 --> 0:09:12.640
<v Speaker 2>Azure a big, big revenue gainer. How about you know

0:09:12.679 --> 0:09:15.400
<v Speaker 2>the rest of the company. Where's Microsoft stand? Because we're

0:09:15.400 --> 0:09:16.439
<v Speaker 2>out Wednesday as well.

0:09:16.520 --> 0:09:20.360
<v Speaker 7>I think one thing was clear from google'sprint is Microsoft

0:09:20.440 --> 0:09:23.600
<v Speaker 7>Azure business is going to put up another strong quarter.

0:09:23.679 --> 0:09:27.319
<v Speaker 7>We are talking another mid thirty five, like mid thirty

0:09:27.320 --> 0:09:31.920
<v Speaker 7>percent growth for an Azure, which was a real surprise

0:09:32.040 --> 0:09:35.120
<v Speaker 7>last quarter. But now the numbers have gone up for Azure,

0:09:35.200 --> 0:09:40.320
<v Speaker 7>so you will see another strong quarter for Azure. But overall, look,

0:09:40.400 --> 0:09:44.640
<v Speaker 7>Microsoft has been one of the biggest beneficiaries of this

0:09:44.880 --> 0:09:49.520
<v Speaker 7>AI infrastructure spend and the cloud business that it has benefited.

0:09:49.640 --> 0:09:52.840
<v Speaker 7>And in Google's case, you know, it's a fifty billion

0:09:52.880 --> 0:09:56.720
<v Speaker 7>dollars run rate business cloud growing almost you know, thirty

0:09:56.760 --> 0:10:00.720
<v Speaker 7>percent plus now, so that could double to hundred billion

0:10:00.760 --> 0:10:04.040
<v Speaker 7>in two years. In Microsoft's case, it's the same kind

0:10:04.040 --> 0:10:08.080
<v Speaker 7>of momentum, and that's why cloud is the real beneficiary

0:10:08.440 --> 0:10:11.400
<v Speaker 7>of this AI infrastructure spent. On one hand, we call

0:10:11.480 --> 0:10:14.679
<v Speaker 7>out how Nvidia is benefited on the chip side. On

0:10:14.720 --> 0:10:17.560
<v Speaker 7>the software side, it's the cloud companies. And that's where

0:10:17.600 --> 0:10:20.960
<v Speaker 7>I would put Microsoft and Google. Amazon, which is another

0:10:21.679 --> 0:10:25.320
<v Speaker 7>one reporting next week and has expoture to cloud, I

0:10:25.360 --> 0:10:29.400
<v Speaker 7>think their growth rates are still way down compared to

0:10:30.280 --> 0:10:33.280
<v Speaker 7>Google and Microsoft Cloud, which is growing you know, thirty

0:10:33.280 --> 0:10:37.080
<v Speaker 7>percent plus. Amazon's growth may still be around that's seventeen

0:10:37.160 --> 0:10:38.440
<v Speaker 7>to twenty percent.

0:10:38.720 --> 0:10:41.439
<v Speaker 2>And still strong, still very strong.

0:10:41.120 --> 0:10:44.120
<v Speaker 7>For a business of over one hundred billion dollar run rate.

0:10:44.240 --> 0:10:49.440
<v Speaker 7>It's very good growth when you compare them share in cloud.

0:10:49.800 --> 0:10:52.960
<v Speaker 7>I do think, you know, Microsoft and Google seem to

0:10:53.000 --> 0:10:57.120
<v Speaker 7>be taking share because of this AI workloud shift, and

0:10:57.480 --> 0:11:01.280
<v Speaker 7>that's where Amazon has to kind step up in terms

0:11:01.360 --> 0:11:04.560
<v Speaker 7>of how they will increase the growth rate for their

0:11:04.559 --> 0:11:05.479
<v Speaker 7>cloud business.

0:11:05.720 --> 0:11:09.280
<v Speaker 2>Now the outlier in this horse race for AI, Apple

0:11:09.720 --> 0:11:12.920
<v Speaker 2>also next week, has been way behind, has no sign

0:11:12.960 --> 0:11:16.040
<v Speaker 2>of even catching up except for partnerships it's making. But

0:11:17.040 --> 0:11:19.200
<v Speaker 2>what do you expect there. I mean, the iPhone sixteen

0:11:19.240 --> 0:11:22.520
<v Speaker 2>is smash hit. We have services have been very strong,

0:11:22.840 --> 0:11:25.800
<v Speaker 2>but are they still behind. They're still going to make

0:11:25.800 --> 0:11:27.520
<v Speaker 2>a ton of money, there's no doubt.

0:11:27.760 --> 0:11:32.040
<v Speaker 7>I think with Apple now announcing they're getting into insurance business.

0:11:32.160 --> 0:11:36.560
<v Speaker 7>The twenty dollars per month for three devices, that's just

0:11:36.720 --> 0:11:41.280
<v Speaker 7>aimed at improving the services run rate. To me, everyone

0:11:41.360 --> 0:11:44.760
<v Speaker 7>looks up to Apple for what they will do on

0:11:44.840 --> 0:11:48.520
<v Speaker 7>the AI side, and that is a big question mark

0:11:48.559 --> 0:11:52.640
<v Speaker 7>whether they have a compelling AI strategy. I think they

0:11:52.640 --> 0:11:55.800
<v Speaker 7>are going to go to the partnership route, but right

0:11:55.840 --> 0:11:58.600
<v Speaker 7>now we have no signs to suggest there will be

0:11:58.640 --> 0:12:03.000
<v Speaker 7>a big upgrade or refresh cycle for their devices because

0:12:03.120 --> 0:12:06.840
<v Speaker 7>AI right now is still being used on the cloud.

0:12:07.360 --> 0:12:11.920
<v Speaker 7>People are not really using AI assistant that's installed on

0:12:11.960 --> 0:12:15.600
<v Speaker 7>the phone. Because these lms are called large anglid models

0:12:15.600 --> 0:12:18.880
<v Speaker 7>for a reason. They require a lot of compute and

0:12:19.000 --> 0:12:22.600
<v Speaker 7>memory that you can't have on device, and so that's

0:12:22.679 --> 0:12:27.440
<v Speaker 7>where Apple has to strike partnerships. They have to enhance

0:12:27.480 --> 0:12:31.240
<v Speaker 7>their hardware to run AI on device, and we are

0:12:31.280 --> 0:12:34.479
<v Speaker 7>talking about at least at twelve to twenty four month timeframes,

0:12:34.559 --> 0:12:38.520
<v Speaker 7>so you're not gonna see anything that investors will find exciting,

0:12:38.559 --> 0:12:40.000
<v Speaker 7>at least in this print.

0:12:40.000 --> 0:12:42.520
<v Speaker 2>Well, a lot to look forward to. Meta and Microsoft

0:12:42.600 --> 0:12:45.600
<v Speaker 2>earnings out this Wednesday. Amazon and Apple on Thursday are

0:12:45.600 --> 0:12:49.840
<v Speaker 2>thanks to Mandeep Sing, Bloomberg Intelligence Senior Tech industry analyst.

0:12:50.280 --> 0:12:52.400
<v Speaker 2>And coming up on Bloomberg day Break weekend, we'll look

0:12:52.400 --> 0:12:55.400
<v Speaker 2>at whether President Trump's Scottish golf trip can yield any

0:12:55.520 --> 0:13:09.880
<v Speaker 2>political wins. I'm Tom Busby and this is Bloomberg. This

0:13:10.000 --> 0:13:12.240
<v Speaker 2>is Bloomberg day Break weekend, our global look ahead at

0:13:12.280 --> 0:13:14.920
<v Speaker 2>the top stories for investors in the coming week. I'm

0:13:14.960 --> 0:13:17.920
<v Speaker 2>Tom Busby in New York. Up later in our program

0:13:17.920 --> 0:13:20.439
<v Speaker 2>and look at some key economic data coming out of

0:13:20.440 --> 0:13:24.520
<v Speaker 2>the world's second largest economy. But first, fresh from a

0:13:24.520 --> 0:13:27.120
<v Speaker 2>flurry of trade deal announcements, President Trump is in the

0:13:27.200 --> 0:13:30.480
<v Speaker 2>UK in Scotland. His trip will be a mixture of

0:13:30.480 --> 0:13:33.160
<v Speaker 2>business and pleasure. But in the coming days the President

0:13:33.200 --> 0:13:35.600
<v Speaker 2>has set to hold meetings with UK Prime Minister Kure

0:13:35.679 --> 0:13:40.080
<v Speaker 2>Starmer and John Swinney, First Minister of Scotland. Can the

0:13:40.160 --> 0:13:43.920
<v Speaker 2>duo sweet talk Trumpet to further trade concessions For more,

0:13:44.080 --> 0:13:46.040
<v Speaker 2>Let's go to London and bring in Bloomberg day Break

0:13:46.040 --> 0:13:48.280
<v Speaker 2>Europe anchor Caroline Hepgar.

0:13:48.480 --> 0:13:52.440
<v Speaker 3>Tom President Donald Trump Count's Scottish ancestry as part of

0:13:52.480 --> 0:13:55.800
<v Speaker 3>his heritage. His mother, Mary Anne MacLeod, was one of

0:13:55.840 --> 0:13:58.600
<v Speaker 3>thousands of Scotts who left for the US and Canada

0:13:58.800 --> 0:14:01.240
<v Speaker 3>at the beginning of the last century in a bid

0:14:01.280 --> 0:14:05.600
<v Speaker 3>to escape economic hardship at home. But despite the family ties,

0:14:05.720 --> 0:14:09.560
<v Speaker 3>the US President's relationship with the country is a complicated one.

0:14:09.760 --> 0:14:12.640
<v Speaker 3>During his last visit to Scotland in twenty eighteen, the

0:14:12.679 --> 0:14:16.719
<v Speaker 3>President was booed during an afternoon golf game by demonstrators

0:14:16.760 --> 0:14:20.160
<v Speaker 3>at his resort in Turnbury, and the entire trip was

0:14:20.240 --> 0:14:24.120
<v Speaker 3>dogged by protests of thousands of people in Glasgow, Edinburgh

0:14:24.200 --> 0:14:28.400
<v Speaker 3>and Aberdeen. This time round, controversial White House policies could

0:14:28.440 --> 0:14:31.720
<v Speaker 3>make for a similar reception as Trump visits his two

0:14:31.760 --> 0:14:35.360
<v Speaker 3>Scottish golf properties. His plan for international trade is also

0:14:35.440 --> 0:14:39.560
<v Speaker 3>something the White House Press Secretary Caroline Leavitt expanded on recently.

0:14:40.320 --> 0:14:42.240
<v Speaker 8>Look, I can tell you the trade team and the

0:14:42.240 --> 0:14:45.360
<v Speaker 8>President himself continue to be very engaged with countries around

0:14:45.360 --> 0:14:48.280
<v Speaker 8>the world when it comes to our trade agreements. But

0:14:48.320 --> 0:14:51.520
<v Speaker 8>the August first deadline is just really the start date

0:14:51.920 --> 0:14:54.480
<v Speaker 8>for when the United States of America will begin collecting

0:14:54.520 --> 0:14:56.680
<v Speaker 8>this revenue from all of the countries around the world

0:14:56.800 --> 0:14:58.640
<v Speaker 8>who the President has sent these letters to.

0:14:59.000 --> 0:15:00.440
<v Speaker 5>You could see some more years.

0:15:00.240 --> 0:15:02.720
<v Speaker 8>Before August first, John, you could have some more trade

0:15:02.720 --> 0:15:06.080
<v Speaker 8>announcements as well. I can tell you the President, Secretary

0:15:06.080 --> 0:15:09.440
<v Speaker 8>of Treasury, Secretary of Commerce, Ambassador Greer all continue to

0:15:09.480 --> 0:15:11.440
<v Speaker 8>be in constant communication with our trading partners.

0:15:12.040 --> 0:15:15.640
<v Speaker 3>The White House is Caroline Levitt speaking to reporters there. Well,

0:15:15.680 --> 0:15:16.120
<v Speaker 3>do you know what I mean?

0:15:16.120 --> 0:15:16.280
<v Speaker 7>Now?

0:15:16.280 --> 0:15:19.680
<v Speaker 3>It's Bloomberg's Edinburgh based reporter James Laden and our White

0:15:19.680 --> 0:15:23.000
<v Speaker 3>House correspondent Skyla Woodhouse. Welcome to both of you. Thank

0:15:23.000 --> 0:15:25.920
<v Speaker 3>you for speaking to me. James, Maybe can I start

0:15:25.960 --> 0:15:30.119
<v Speaker 3>with you. Trump has long been i'll say, infatuated with Scotland.

0:15:30.320 --> 0:15:33.160
<v Speaker 3>The Scot's perhaps a bit less so with him. Just

0:15:33.240 --> 0:15:36.240
<v Speaker 3>talk us through the perceptions of President Donald Trump on

0:15:36.280 --> 0:15:36.640
<v Speaker 3>the ground.

0:15:36.720 --> 0:15:40.920
<v Speaker 9>Now, Yeah, in your intro you did mention how there

0:15:40.960 --> 0:15:44.400
<v Speaker 9>were some demos against him when you was here last

0:15:44.720 --> 0:15:48.800
<v Speaker 9>I think those demos were more personality based, whereas I

0:15:48.800 --> 0:15:53.400
<v Speaker 9>think the demos that are being planned are both personality

0:15:53.560 --> 0:15:58.360
<v Speaker 9>and politics based. So there's a subtle difference there. One

0:15:58.360 --> 0:16:00.880
<v Speaker 9>thing I think that you need to sort of remind

0:16:00.920 --> 0:16:04.280
<v Speaker 9>yourselves about the Scottish psyche if you like, is that

0:16:06.320 --> 0:16:09.920
<v Speaker 9>someone who shall we say, is kind of fairy, brash

0:16:09.960 --> 0:16:12.960
<v Speaker 9>and a showman. That doesn't necessarily go down very well

0:16:13.160 --> 0:16:18.400
<v Speaker 9>here in Scotland. They tend to admire people who are

0:16:18.440 --> 0:16:22.160
<v Speaker 9>a bit more understated. And also Scotland does have a

0:16:22.200 --> 0:16:27.080
<v Speaker 9>reputation of cheering for the underdog over the years, and

0:16:27.120 --> 0:16:31.520
<v Speaker 9>certainly having a slightly larger big brother, shall we say,

0:16:31.960 --> 0:16:35.040
<v Speaker 9>to the South that's been dominating proceedings for several centuries.

0:16:35.720 --> 0:16:39.320
<v Speaker 9>That also probably explains why Scott's they prefer the underdog

0:16:39.480 --> 0:16:40.800
<v Speaker 9>rather than the top dog.

0:16:41.360 --> 0:16:45.520
<v Speaker 3>H Okay Skyler. And President Trump's also coming to the

0:16:45.640 --> 0:16:48.400
<v Speaker 3>UK for full proper state visit in only a few

0:16:48.440 --> 0:16:51.360
<v Speaker 3>weeks time. Why do you think he's making this trip

0:16:51.440 --> 0:16:52.560
<v Speaker 3>to Scotland now?

0:16:53.080 --> 0:16:55.000
<v Speaker 10>I mean the White House is saying, you know, this

0:16:55.080 --> 0:16:58.320
<v Speaker 10>is a moment for the President and Prime Minister Starmer

0:16:58.480 --> 0:17:02.280
<v Speaker 10>to refine the trade deal from just a few months ago.

0:17:02.720 --> 0:17:05.119
<v Speaker 10>You know, we'll hopefully we'll get an update on what's

0:17:05.119 --> 0:17:07.360
<v Speaker 10>maybe some more of the fine print details of that

0:17:07.400 --> 0:17:10.560
<v Speaker 10>trade agreement are. And there's obviously a lot happening in

0:17:10.600 --> 0:17:13.600
<v Speaker 10>the world right now there's you know, Ukraine and Russia

0:17:13.640 --> 0:17:15.960
<v Speaker 10>that has been you know, front and center for President Trump,

0:17:16.040 --> 0:17:18.040
<v Speaker 10>and you know, so we're you know, looking to see

0:17:18.080 --> 0:17:21.199
<v Speaker 10>if we could see any sort of maybe new agreement

0:17:21.920 --> 0:17:24.080
<v Speaker 10>between the two countries there or just sort of what

0:17:24.119 --> 0:17:26.960
<v Speaker 10>the strategy you know, might look like. So there's a

0:17:26.960 --> 0:17:29.480
<v Speaker 10>lot of talk around national security right now.

0:17:29.720 --> 0:17:29.919
<v Speaker 5>You know.

0:17:30.000 --> 0:17:32.840
<v Speaker 10>So it's kind of a mix of you know, the

0:17:32.880 --> 0:17:37.359
<v Speaker 10>presidents who we all know loves to golf and you

0:17:37.400 --> 0:17:40.359
<v Speaker 10>know frequently he'll be in Florida, you know, golfing and

0:17:40.400 --> 0:17:42.840
<v Speaker 10>things like that. But you know, we're expecting to see

0:17:43.280 --> 0:17:47.000
<v Speaker 10>probably a more refined trade deal than what we saw earlier.

0:17:47.080 --> 0:17:49.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, absolutely, entire it's hugely important, I mean, both the

0:17:49.560 --> 0:17:51.800
<v Speaker 3>kised arma of the UK as a whole and Scotland

0:17:51.840 --> 0:17:55.200
<v Speaker 3>in particular as well. Is there going to be any

0:17:55.280 --> 0:17:58.840
<v Speaker 3>expectation actually of any progress in terms of trade discussions?

0:17:58.840 --> 0:17:59.359
<v Speaker 2>Do you think?

0:18:00.119 --> 0:18:03.080
<v Speaker 10>I think one thing that's particularly interesting with the trade

0:18:03.080 --> 0:18:06.960
<v Speaker 10>agreements that we've just been seeing across the board, Obviously,

0:18:07.000 --> 0:18:10.840
<v Speaker 10>this is something that President Trump is very passionate about

0:18:10.880 --> 0:18:15.720
<v Speaker 10>and is definitely dominating his second term and as president.

0:18:16.480 --> 0:18:19.040
<v Speaker 10>You know, so I think it'll be interesting to watch

0:18:19.440 --> 0:18:24.480
<v Speaker 10>what the fine print looks like. We've we're approaching that

0:18:24.600 --> 0:18:28.080
<v Speaker 10>August first deadline with a plethora of countries and we're

0:18:28.080 --> 0:18:32.359
<v Speaker 10>starting to see you know, the rates coming in you know,

0:18:32.400 --> 0:18:35.000
<v Speaker 10>a different level. So I think it'll be interesting to

0:18:35.040 --> 0:18:40.520
<v Speaker 10>see what maybe has changed from the you know, the

0:18:40.560 --> 0:18:43.320
<v Speaker 10>deal that was presented a few months ago to now

0:18:43.480 --> 0:18:45.919
<v Speaker 10>and to compare and contrast what has changed or what

0:18:45.960 --> 0:18:46.760
<v Speaker 10>has not changed.

0:18:47.400 --> 0:18:49.760
<v Speaker 3>James, what do you think the Scottish First Minister John

0:18:49.800 --> 0:18:52.840
<v Speaker 3>Swinney is likely to cover maybe try to press with

0:18:52.920 --> 0:18:54.120
<v Speaker 3>the US President.

0:18:54.880 --> 0:18:56.760
<v Speaker 9>Well, I guess so the biggest thing here is whiskey.

0:18:57.200 --> 0:19:02.439
<v Speaker 9>Personally not a fan, but I mean it's it's the

0:19:02.440 --> 0:19:07.320
<v Speaker 9>biggest export that we have up here, and any potential

0:19:08.160 --> 0:19:11.000
<v Speaker 9>reducing the tariffs on whiskey I think would go a

0:19:11.000 --> 0:19:13.560
<v Speaker 9>long way up here. But at the end of the day,

0:19:13.600 --> 0:19:16.000
<v Speaker 9>the personal sign the document is going to be starmer,

0:19:16.240 --> 0:19:20.960
<v Speaker 9>So there's a slight set of dichotomy there. Otherwise, I

0:19:21.000 --> 0:19:24.600
<v Speaker 9>mean Swinny he is involved a little bit in the

0:19:25.800 --> 0:19:29.760
<v Speaker 9>long running staga about whether Turnbury, one of Trump's golf sites,

0:19:29.800 --> 0:19:33.000
<v Speaker 9>will ever host the Open again, so there will be

0:19:33.040 --> 0:19:36.119
<v Speaker 9>some chat on that, I dare say, But at the

0:19:36.200 --> 0:19:38.960
<v Speaker 9>end of the day, the decision comes down to the

0:19:39.320 --> 0:19:43.400
<v Speaker 9>rural ancient golf club in Saint Andrew's RNA. But there

0:19:43.440 --> 0:19:46.359
<v Speaker 9>will be pressure from Swinny and also from Starma to

0:19:46.440 --> 0:19:48.199
<v Speaker 9>try to make this happen. But then to make it

0:19:48.200 --> 0:19:51.840
<v Speaker 9>happen you kind of need to have much better communications.

0:19:51.840 --> 0:19:54.520
<v Speaker 9>You must have much better roads and rail systems, and

0:19:54.680 --> 0:19:56.560
<v Speaker 9>to get that you're going to have to get the

0:19:56.600 --> 0:19:58.919
<v Speaker 9>tax player to stump up for it very properly, and

0:19:59.000 --> 0:20:00.119
<v Speaker 9>that will be a big.

0:20:00.160 --> 0:20:05.240
<v Speaker 3>Problem in terms of travel. It's obviously quite a privileged

0:20:05.280 --> 0:20:08.000
<v Speaker 3>position for the UK to be in and Scotland in

0:20:08.040 --> 0:20:10.440
<v Speaker 3>some ways to be hosting, you know, a visit, even

0:20:10.480 --> 0:20:13.080
<v Speaker 3>an informal visit from the US president, given how much

0:20:13.160 --> 0:20:15.560
<v Speaker 3>is riding on this and President Trump's actually got some

0:20:15.600 --> 0:20:18.640
<v Speaker 3>cousins who still live on the kind of ancestral island

0:20:18.680 --> 0:20:22.120
<v Speaker 3>where his mother came from. How important do you think

0:20:22.240 --> 0:20:25.160
<v Speaker 3>the relationship is at the moment, Skyler, between the US

0:20:25.200 --> 0:20:28.200
<v Speaker 3>and the UK as we see these really quite fraught

0:20:28.320 --> 0:20:31.600
<v Speaker 3>negotiations with many countries rushing to try to make the

0:20:31.640 --> 0:20:33.439
<v Speaker 3>August first deadline.

0:20:33.760 --> 0:20:38.240
<v Speaker 10>I think one thing the traupid administration, you know, they

0:20:38.240 --> 0:20:40.239
<v Speaker 10>do a lot of things differently, But ultimately I do

0:20:40.240 --> 0:20:43.040
<v Speaker 10>think there is an understanding that the relationship with the

0:20:43.160 --> 0:20:45.840
<v Speaker 10>UK is a very important one that obviously has a

0:20:45.920 --> 0:20:50.840
<v Speaker 10>very long standing history, you know, so I do think

0:20:50.920 --> 0:20:54.360
<v Speaker 10>the administration is looking to sort of continue to keep

0:20:54.400 --> 0:20:57.880
<v Speaker 10>that relationship intact and whatever way that might be. I mean,

0:20:57.880 --> 0:21:00.959
<v Speaker 10>but it's still very interesting that of the trade deals,

0:21:01.040 --> 0:21:04.520
<v Speaker 10>the UK was one of the first to see a

0:21:04.600 --> 0:21:07.760
<v Speaker 10>deal and an agreement and there was the Oval event

0:21:07.840 --> 0:21:10.560
<v Speaker 10>where Starmar I believed, phoned in, you know, so you know,

0:21:10.640 --> 0:21:14.479
<v Speaker 10>they're definitely trying to show a united front between the

0:21:14.480 --> 0:21:19.440
<v Speaker 10>two countries, which on the global stage could be very

0:21:19.480 --> 0:21:21.679
<v Speaker 10>telling that you know, we have the US and the

0:21:21.800 --> 0:21:24.960
<v Speaker 10>UK sort of you know, aligned, even if there are

0:21:25.200 --> 0:21:27.679
<v Speaker 10>differences you know, on some things. But now do you

0:21:27.680 --> 0:21:30.639
<v Speaker 10>think administration is you know looking to sort of you know,

0:21:30.640 --> 0:21:33.560
<v Speaker 10>make sure that that relationship continues to remain stable.

0:21:33.920 --> 0:21:37.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, in terms of what you expect then also from

0:21:37.160 --> 0:21:39.280
<v Speaker 3>the State visit in September and how important that is.

0:21:39.320 --> 0:21:42.520
<v Speaker 3>We've had out the for example, the car and truck

0:21:42.600 --> 0:21:45.960
<v Speaker 3>manufacturing figures for the UK. That's a very important market

0:21:46.200 --> 0:21:49.800
<v Speaker 3>for Britain, the US sending vehicles there. It's actually just

0:21:49.840 --> 0:21:52.080
<v Speaker 3>below the relationship with the EU, but it's still very

0:21:52.119 --> 0:21:54.920
<v Speaker 3>important and actually we've seen a big kind of cratering

0:21:55.000 --> 0:21:57.800
<v Speaker 3>in terms of the numbers of vehicles that are being

0:21:57.920 --> 0:22:01.200
<v Speaker 3>exported and in fact just rolling off the lines here

0:22:01.240 --> 0:22:04.920
<v Speaker 3>in the UK. How important is this kind of other

0:22:05.080 --> 0:22:09.240
<v Speaker 3>sector issues between the US and the UK And do

0:22:09.280 --> 0:22:12.240
<v Speaker 3>you think anything might change, let's say, in the September

0:22:12.280 --> 0:22:15.080
<v Speaker 3>State visit. How is that being seen in the US?

0:22:15.359 --> 0:22:17.679
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, I know, it's a good point to mention the

0:22:17.800 --> 0:22:21.520
<v Speaker 10>sectors because that's something we're watching very closely in the

0:22:21.560 --> 0:22:24.600
<v Speaker 10>mix of all of the trade deals. But when you

0:22:24.640 --> 0:22:28.040
<v Speaker 10>boil it down to the sectors, whether it's autos pharmaceuticals,

0:22:28.280 --> 0:22:30.600
<v Speaker 10>that's a space you know where we're you know, trying

0:22:30.640 --> 0:22:32.640
<v Speaker 10>to see if there's any movement there because we still

0:22:32.680 --> 0:22:36.119
<v Speaker 10>haven't really seen a lot of details in the pharma space,

0:22:36.160 --> 0:22:39.640
<v Speaker 10>but it has been something the President talks about pretty frequently.

0:22:40.040 --> 0:22:42.200
<v Speaker 10>So we're definitely watching that space. But I think in

0:22:42.280 --> 0:22:45.360
<v Speaker 10>the US in terms of perception, you know, one thing,

0:22:45.520 --> 0:22:47.040
<v Speaker 10>you know, what we've been seeing a lot right now

0:22:47.080 --> 0:22:49.800
<v Speaker 10>is there's just a lot of back and forth, and

0:22:49.920 --> 0:22:51.960
<v Speaker 10>you know, with this administration, they definitely keep us on

0:22:51.960 --> 0:22:56.240
<v Speaker 10>our toes. But you know, they move forward with one

0:22:56.320 --> 0:23:00.880
<v Speaker 10>thing and then there can be a shift the policy

0:23:00.960 --> 0:23:04.199
<v Speaker 10>a little bit, whether it's more or less, and that

0:23:04.320 --> 0:23:06.240
<v Speaker 10>is something we're you know, I think folks are really

0:23:06.280 --> 0:23:10.280
<v Speaker 10>paying attention to you because it does shake up what

0:23:10.480 --> 0:23:12.960
<v Speaker 10>exactly is going on if you say one thing and

0:23:13.000 --> 0:23:17.159
<v Speaker 10>then you know it changes. But the President continues to

0:23:17.200 --> 0:23:21.200
<v Speaker 10>say that, you know, if you accept you know, American

0:23:21.240 --> 0:23:24.440
<v Speaker 10>products and we can you know, enter that market. You know, well,

0:23:24.560 --> 0:23:26.679
<v Speaker 10>we want tearif you or tear affe less. So you

0:23:26.720 --> 0:23:30.200
<v Speaker 10>know that's what Trump has been negotiating with around that.

0:23:30.480 --> 0:23:36.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, absolutely, James. A thought then from the perspective in Edinburgh.

0:23:36.119 --> 0:23:38.080
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I know that you know quite a bit

0:23:38.119 --> 0:23:40.600
<v Speaker 3>about golf and all the golf courses that are up

0:23:40.640 --> 0:23:42.919
<v Speaker 3>in Scotland. I mean, how important do you think that

0:23:43.040 --> 0:23:46.399
<v Speaker 3>the trip is for the US person to spend time

0:23:46.480 --> 0:23:49.240
<v Speaker 3>in Scotland? As Skylar is sort of pointing out, the

0:23:49.359 --> 0:23:53.000
<v Speaker 3>US person is known for being changeable and maybe that

0:23:53.119 --> 0:23:55.919
<v Speaker 3>offers a kind of opening in terms of influence.

0:23:56.520 --> 0:23:59.480
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, it does a bit. It's easier for him certainly

0:23:59.560 --> 0:24:03.359
<v Speaker 9>to come to Scotland rather than England. He can't hide

0:24:03.359 --> 0:24:06.199
<v Speaker 9>so much if you like in England if he wanted to,

0:24:07.280 --> 0:24:10.520
<v Speaker 9>and he does have these two golf properties up here

0:24:10.880 --> 0:24:15.040
<v Speaker 9>which are very high profile. They're also very good courses.

0:24:15.440 --> 0:24:19.680
<v Speaker 9>But and then he is having that that's an idea

0:24:19.680 --> 0:24:23.359
<v Speaker 9>about Look, I'm here in my homeland of Scotland. I

0:24:23.359 --> 0:24:25.480
<v Speaker 9>mean leaving aside the fact that it would take you

0:24:25.480 --> 0:24:28.320
<v Speaker 9>what eight hours to get from his site in Aberdeen

0:24:28.359 --> 0:24:31.000
<v Speaker 9>to where his mother was born on Lewis. It's kind

0:24:31.000 --> 0:24:33.760
<v Speaker 9>of a long long way away. But he will play

0:24:33.840 --> 0:24:36.960
<v Speaker 9>up this idea about him, you know, coming home sort

0:24:37.000 --> 0:24:40.320
<v Speaker 9>of thing, which you have to say is taken with

0:24:40.400 --> 0:24:43.640
<v Speaker 9>a very large salt from many of the local populace

0:24:44.280 --> 0:24:47.399
<v Speaker 9>on that. But that's an idea about him coming to

0:24:47.520 --> 0:24:51.159
<v Speaker 9>where he thinks his roots are. That probably makes it

0:24:51.240 --> 0:24:54.760
<v Speaker 9>easier for him to feel in a way that he

0:24:54.960 --> 0:24:59.320
<v Speaker 9>is negotiating or talking with Starmer on something of a

0:24:59.800 --> 0:25:03.080
<v Speaker 9>level playing field, you know what I mean. Yes, he's

0:25:03.080 --> 0:25:06.640
<v Speaker 9>a visitor, but he also gets the Scottish thing.

0:25:07.160 --> 0:25:09.960
<v Speaker 3>James, thank you so much for being with me today Brimberg,

0:25:10.040 --> 0:25:12.880
<v Speaker 3>James Lordon and to skylar Woodhouse on your first trip

0:25:12.920 --> 0:25:16.000
<v Speaker 3>to Scotland and here in the UK. Thank you very

0:25:16.040 --> 0:25:18.159
<v Speaker 3>much for your time. I'm Caroline hepget here in London.

0:25:18.320 --> 0:25:20.640
<v Speaker 3>You can catch us every weekday morning for Bloomberg day Break.

0:25:20.640 --> 0:25:22.119
<v Speaker 3>You at the beginning at six am in London.

0:25:22.320 --> 0:25:22.680
<v Speaker 7>That's one.

0:25:22.720 --> 0:25:24.320
<v Speaker 3>I am on Wall Street, Tom.

0:25:24.400 --> 0:25:27.120
<v Speaker 2>Thank you Caroline, and coming up on Bloomberg day Break

0:25:27.119 --> 0:25:29.680
<v Speaker 2>weekend to look ahead to some fresh economic data out

0:25:29.720 --> 0:25:43.399
<v Speaker 2>of China. I'm Tom Busby and this is Bloomberg. This

0:25:43.440 --> 0:25:45.760
<v Speaker 2>is Bloomberg day Break weekend, our global look ahead at

0:25:45.760 --> 0:25:48.400
<v Speaker 2>the top stories for investors in the coming week. I'm

0:25:48.440 --> 0:25:51.879
<v Speaker 2>Tom Busby in New York. Market watchers turn to fresh

0:25:51.960 --> 0:25:54.399
<v Speaker 2>economic data this week for a temperature check on the

0:25:54.400 --> 0:25:57.919
<v Speaker 2>world's second largest economy. For more, let's get to the

0:25:57.920 --> 0:26:00.760
<v Speaker 2>host of the Daybreak Asia podcast, Doug Crisler.

0:26:01.200 --> 0:26:04.920
<v Speaker 4>Tom. The outlook for the Chinese economy is showing promise,

0:26:04.960 --> 0:26:08.639
<v Speaker 4>and recently Bloomberg Economics raised its full year growth forecast

0:26:08.720 --> 0:26:11.719
<v Speaker 4>for China to an annual rate of four point eight percent. Now,

0:26:11.760 --> 0:26:15.240
<v Speaker 4>to be fair, hurdles do remain and there is still

0:26:15.320 --> 0:26:18.240
<v Speaker 4>the need for policy support. In the week ahead, we'll

0:26:18.240 --> 0:26:21.080
<v Speaker 4>get a clearer understanding of where things stand with the

0:26:21.119 --> 0:26:25.480
<v Speaker 4>release of several PMI readings. They'll help capture sentiment among

0:26:25.560 --> 0:26:30.040
<v Speaker 4>Chinese manufacturers and services providers alike to help us look ahead.

0:26:30.119 --> 0:26:33.000
<v Speaker 4>I am joined by David Chu. He is China economist

0:26:33.240 --> 0:26:36.760
<v Speaker 4>for Bloomberg Economics. David joins us from our studios in

0:26:36.840 --> 0:26:39.640
<v Speaker 4>Hong Kong. David, thank you so much for taking time

0:26:39.680 --> 0:26:42.760
<v Speaker 4>to chat with me. Can you begin by giving me

0:26:43.320 --> 0:26:45.359
<v Speaker 4>kind of your view on what we may learn this

0:26:45.400 --> 0:26:47.119
<v Speaker 4>week from the PMI data for China.

0:26:47.680 --> 0:26:47.840
<v Speaker 6>Ah.

0:26:47.920 --> 0:26:51.280
<v Speaker 11>Yes, What we can say is that we expected the

0:26:51.840 --> 0:26:58.600
<v Speaker 11>manufacturing PMI to soften the BIDA from last months because

0:26:58.880 --> 0:27:03.040
<v Speaker 11>we saw some leading indicators and African indicators pointing to

0:27:03.960 --> 0:27:09.159
<v Speaker 11>the slow, marginal slowed down in the manufacturing activities. I

0:27:09.160 --> 0:27:12.520
<v Speaker 11>think one of the reasons is that the ft loading export,

0:27:13.080 --> 0:27:17.280
<v Speaker 11>it's somehow it has slowed a bit after the peak

0:27:17.440 --> 0:27:20.560
<v Speaker 11>in the in June, so I think that is the reason.

0:27:20.880 --> 0:27:25.080
<v Speaker 11>Another reason is that we think the cloud of the

0:27:25.119 --> 0:27:28.000
<v Speaker 11>trade wall is still there so that people are not

0:27:28.080 --> 0:27:34.640
<v Speaker 11>so confident to expand capacity, so that the overall manufacturing

0:27:34.960 --> 0:27:40.879
<v Speaker 11>activity should slow down after acceleration in June.

0:27:41.160 --> 0:27:44.320
<v Speaker 4>So when it comes to the services economies in China,

0:27:44.359 --> 0:27:46.040
<v Speaker 4>how is domestic demand right now?

0:27:46.600 --> 0:27:49.879
<v Speaker 11>Well for July because it is a summer holiday season,

0:27:50.000 --> 0:27:53.520
<v Speaker 11>so that we think the service side will be supportive

0:27:53.880 --> 0:27:58.159
<v Speaker 11>to the to the non manufacturing PMI as well. But

0:27:58.400 --> 0:28:01.320
<v Speaker 11>on the other hand, we think the the construction is

0:28:01.359 --> 0:28:05.600
<v Speaker 11>still steady compared with June. So overall speakning, we think

0:28:05.640 --> 0:28:11.240
<v Speaker 11>the non manufacturing activity should accelerate a bit from June.

0:28:11.560 --> 0:28:14.159
<v Speaker 4>Give me your sense of the extent to which the

0:28:14.200 --> 0:28:17.440
<v Speaker 4>property market, as negative as it has been, is still

0:28:17.440 --> 0:28:19.800
<v Speaker 4>a major drag on the economy. Is that beginning to

0:28:19.920 --> 0:28:21.440
<v Speaker 4>change even slightly?

0:28:22.160 --> 0:28:26.879
<v Speaker 11>Not yet. Based on the sales data, we think the

0:28:26.960 --> 0:28:29.920
<v Speaker 11>activity in the housing sector is still drag and it

0:28:30.040 --> 0:28:34.200
<v Speaker 11>may be even worse than the last month based on

0:28:34.280 --> 0:28:38.800
<v Speaker 11>the new home sales data so far. So looking forward,

0:28:38.920 --> 0:28:43.719
<v Speaker 11>we don't see any scene that you know, for the

0:28:43.760 --> 0:28:47.440
<v Speaker 11>housing sector to rebund soon, even though we have seen

0:28:47.520 --> 0:28:51.400
<v Speaker 11>some stimulus by the government over the past several months,

0:28:51.400 --> 0:28:52.600
<v Speaker 11>but still it's soft.

0:28:52.880 --> 0:28:55.080
<v Speaker 4>If you had to point to a bright spot for

0:28:55.120 --> 0:28:57.160
<v Speaker 4>the Chinese economy right now, what would be.

0:28:58.040 --> 0:29:01.360
<v Speaker 11>I think the production side is all is resilient, although

0:29:01.720 --> 0:29:04.520
<v Speaker 11>if you look at the PMI it is still underwater.

0:29:05.040 --> 0:29:09.560
<v Speaker 11>But if you look at the production side of the

0:29:09.680 --> 0:29:14.000
<v Speaker 11>China economy over the past several quarters, it's still resilient.

0:29:14.200 --> 0:29:18.320
<v Speaker 11>But on the other hand, is what drives the economy

0:29:18.760 --> 0:29:20.840
<v Speaker 11>or what is the key for the economy is the

0:29:20.840 --> 0:29:26.160
<v Speaker 11>consumption side, So that now we emphasize the importance of

0:29:26.320 --> 0:29:30.520
<v Speaker 11>consumption one more so that what we are looking at

0:29:30.640 --> 0:29:33.760
<v Speaker 11>now is the consumption, not the strong part, which is

0:29:34.120 --> 0:29:34.840
<v Speaker 11>good production.

0:29:35.120 --> 0:29:37.600
<v Speaker 4>When I think of the production side, though, I think

0:29:37.640 --> 0:29:41.040
<v Speaker 4>of the tendency for there's still to be a little

0:29:41.040 --> 0:29:43.600
<v Speaker 4>bit of over capacity in the system. Is that being

0:29:43.680 --> 0:29:45.560
<v Speaker 4>taken out slowly and steadily.

0:29:46.360 --> 0:29:50.040
<v Speaker 11>Yes, there has been more and more talks about the

0:29:50.080 --> 0:29:53.480
<v Speaker 11>removal of the overcapacity, but we have to say that

0:29:53.640 --> 0:29:58.040
<v Speaker 11>over capacity means it is more than demand, so that

0:29:58.400 --> 0:30:01.440
<v Speaker 11>I think the government needs to do more in the

0:30:01.480 --> 0:30:04.920
<v Speaker 11>consumption side of the boost demand, so that to reduce

0:30:06.520 --> 0:30:09.680
<v Speaker 11>the difference or the overcapacity on the one hand, I

0:30:09.680 --> 0:30:14.000
<v Speaker 11>mean the relative over capacity compared with the demand site,

0:30:14.120 --> 0:30:17.520
<v Speaker 11>but as well we think the government is doing something

0:30:17.560 --> 0:30:22.560
<v Speaker 11>to we call it anti involution, so that to reduce

0:30:22.680 --> 0:30:26.520
<v Speaker 11>some of the capacity in some way and also let

0:30:26.600 --> 0:30:30.840
<v Speaker 11>people have more time to spending so that they can

0:30:31.880 --> 0:30:32.680
<v Speaker 11>spend more money.

0:30:33.160 --> 0:30:36.240
<v Speaker 4>We know that the overall economy has been in deflation,

0:30:36.400 --> 0:30:39.760
<v Speaker 4>particularly at the wholesale level where you're looking at factory

0:30:39.800 --> 0:30:43.600
<v Speaker 4>gate inflation, to what extent do you believe authorities in

0:30:43.680 --> 0:30:47.120
<v Speaker 4>China are very concerned about this right now, the stubbornness

0:30:47.160 --> 0:30:50.400
<v Speaker 4>of the deflationary story, and I realize that maybe on

0:30:50.440 --> 0:30:54.720
<v Speaker 4>the consumer level it's more disinflationary rather than deflationary, but

0:30:55.360 --> 0:30:58.520
<v Speaker 4>still there seems to be this overall pull that has

0:30:58.560 --> 0:31:00.000
<v Speaker 4>to do with declining prices.

0:31:01.240 --> 0:31:05.880
<v Speaker 11>Yes, I think the government is concerned about the definition

0:31:06.000 --> 0:31:11.120
<v Speaker 11>a lot because the PPI is quite correlated with the

0:31:11.160 --> 0:31:15.720
<v Speaker 11>profitability of the manufacturing sector. So that you may know

0:31:15.960 --> 0:31:21.560
<v Speaker 11>that many of the China's biggest manufacturers, they are ISOs,

0:31:21.720 --> 0:31:26.400
<v Speaker 11>they stayed owned enterprises, so that the if they're making

0:31:26.480 --> 0:31:31.320
<v Speaker 11>a lot of financial losses, that the government must be

0:31:31.360 --> 0:31:33.880
<v Speaker 11>worried about that. I think that is one of the

0:31:33.920 --> 0:31:39.520
<v Speaker 11>reasons why the government UH is considering taking some effort

0:31:39.680 --> 0:31:43.640
<v Speaker 11>to remove some of the over capacities, based on our

0:31:43.760 --> 0:31:50.840
<v Speaker 11>experience in the twenty eighteen round the carting over capacity.

0:31:51.320 --> 0:31:56.800
<v Speaker 11>This would raise the PPI effectively, so that to raise

0:31:56.880 --> 0:32:01.320
<v Speaker 11>the profitability. But the still the problem is that that

0:32:02.400 --> 0:32:07.240
<v Speaker 11>this inflation in the consumption side will probably be still there,

0:32:07.760 --> 0:32:11.640
<v Speaker 11>based also based on the experience from twenty eighteen.

0:32:12.160 --> 0:32:14.160
<v Speaker 4>David, thank you so very much. For making time to

0:32:14.240 --> 0:32:17.040
<v Speaker 4>chat with us. That is David Chu, China economist for

0:32:17.080 --> 0:32:21.840
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg Economics, joining from our studios in Hong Kong, shifting

0:32:21.840 --> 0:32:24.960
<v Speaker 4>gears to tech now and the Chinese consumer. I spoke

0:32:25.000 --> 0:32:28.560
<v Speaker 4>with Stephanie Leung, the chief investment officer at Stashaway. We

0:32:28.680 --> 0:32:33.880
<v Speaker 4>discussed how developments in artificial intelligence are shaping her investment strategy.

0:32:34.280 --> 0:32:35.680
<v Speaker 4>Here's part of that conversation.

0:32:36.120 --> 0:32:40.040
<v Speaker 12>If you look at the latest economic data, it doesn't

0:32:40.080 --> 0:32:44.040
<v Speaker 12>look like that the China consumer is doing a v

0:32:44.080 --> 0:32:44.880
<v Speaker 12>shape recovery.

0:32:45.400 --> 0:32:47.840
<v Speaker 5>And I think that's because of a few reasons.

0:32:47.960 --> 0:32:51.000
<v Speaker 12>Number one is that, of course, if you look at

0:32:51.120 --> 0:32:54.160
<v Speaker 12>kind of where the where a lot of Chinese consumer

0:32:54.720 --> 0:32:57.680
<v Speaker 12>hold the wealth is still in the real estate sector

0:32:58.120 --> 0:33:01.400
<v Speaker 12>and say sex sector is still in a very very

0:33:01.400 --> 0:33:04.080
<v Speaker 12>long row to recovery. And I mean without that, actually

0:33:04.080 --> 0:33:06.920
<v Speaker 12>most Chinese consumers are kind of tightening their belts, right,

0:33:06.920 --> 0:33:10.480
<v Speaker 12>They're not really spending that much. However, if you look

0:33:10.480 --> 0:33:14.080
<v Speaker 12>into kind of I think some of the pockets where

0:33:14.160 --> 0:33:16.080
<v Speaker 12>people are spending, and those tends to be kind of

0:33:16.200 --> 0:33:17.920
<v Speaker 12>lower ticket items.

0:33:18.480 --> 0:33:20.120
<v Speaker 5>By that, I mean, for example.

0:33:19.960 --> 0:33:23.560
<v Speaker 12>Uh just kind of uh tea drinks for example, or

0:33:24.480 --> 0:33:28.560
<v Speaker 12>uh these uh I guess play, I guess.

0:33:28.680 --> 0:33:31.320
<v Speaker 5>Uh, these are like sort of figures.

0:33:31.520 --> 0:33:31.760
<v Speaker 9>Uh.

0:33:31.800 --> 0:33:33.600
<v Speaker 5>For example, one of one.

0:33:33.520 --> 0:33:36.960
<v Speaker 12>Of the companies La Boobooh has has Labou, which is

0:33:37.040 --> 0:33:39.640
<v Speaker 12>very very popular kind of figure in China, and the

0:33:39.720 --> 0:33:43.120
<v Speaker 12>I mean people are are crazy about these. I mean

0:33:43.120 --> 0:33:46.000
<v Speaker 12>these are kind of lower ticket items that that that

0:33:46.200 --> 0:33:48.400
<v Speaker 12>gets very very popular in China. So I think these

0:33:48.440 --> 0:33:51.280
<v Speaker 12>are themes that you can still play within the Chinese

0:33:51.400 --> 0:33:52.560
<v Speaker 12>Chinese consumer sector.

0:33:52.600 --> 0:33:54.280
<v Speaker 5>However, when you look at kind of.

0:33:54.200 --> 0:33:58.640
<v Speaker 12>The bigger ticket items for example auto for example, uh,

0:33:58.880 --> 0:34:01.160
<v Speaker 12>I mean even luxury, and these are kind of still

0:34:01.840 --> 0:34:03.880
<v Speaker 12>in sort of the role to recovery.

0:34:03.920 --> 0:34:05.920
<v Speaker 4>I would say, I'm going to play to one of

0:34:05.960 --> 0:34:11.400
<v Speaker 4>your strengths technology and particularly artificial intelligence. How do you

0:34:11.520 --> 0:34:15.520
<v Speaker 4>understand the risk of some of these AI back chat

0:34:15.520 --> 0:34:18.879
<v Speaker 4>bots posing some sort of risk to a business, even

0:34:18.920 --> 0:34:21.600
<v Speaker 4>for bay Do in China, which has around seventy percent

0:34:21.640 --> 0:34:24.879
<v Speaker 4>of the search market. Is AI a way for this

0:34:24.960 --> 0:34:27.719
<v Speaker 4>to be reimagined? Do you think and maybe does it

0:34:27.760 --> 0:34:29.080
<v Speaker 4>represent a near term risk?

0:34:29.880 --> 0:34:30.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:34:30.200 --> 0:34:32.040
<v Speaker 12>I think, I mean you bring a very very good

0:34:32.040 --> 0:34:34.520
<v Speaker 12>point right in the sense that, of course, if you

0:34:34.520 --> 0:34:37.600
<v Speaker 12>think about the Internet era, search was of a very

0:34:37.640 --> 0:34:41.400
<v Speaker 12>profitable business and Google by do pretty much have like

0:34:41.440 --> 0:34:45.239
<v Speaker 12>a dominance or monopoly in these businesses. However, if we

0:34:45.400 --> 0:34:48.200
<v Speaker 12>enter the AI era, if you think about just what

0:34:48.320 --> 0:34:52.600
<v Speaker 12>people go to search engines to do, they're basically asking questions,

0:34:53.040 --> 0:34:55.399
<v Speaker 12>and you can ask these questions much more directly and

0:34:55.440 --> 0:34:59.520
<v Speaker 12>get much better answers by going to the LM chat

0:34:59.560 --> 0:35:03.600
<v Speaker 12>bots to ask the same questions, and they will give

0:35:03.640 --> 0:35:06.600
<v Speaker 12>you a much more comprehensive answer rather than just the

0:35:06.640 --> 0:35:09.560
<v Speaker 12>templu links that that Google would provide. And I think

0:35:09.560 --> 0:35:13.320
<v Speaker 12>that actually creates a sort of a dilemma for companies

0:35:13.360 --> 0:35:15.239
<v Speaker 12>like Google in a sense that I mean they know

0:35:15.400 --> 0:35:17.880
<v Speaker 12>that that's the direction that things are going. However, of

0:35:17.920 --> 0:35:21.280
<v Speaker 12>course they have existing sort of earnings to try to protect,

0:35:21.719 --> 0:35:23.840
<v Speaker 12>so they need to. I mean, they are trying to

0:35:23.840 --> 0:35:27.680
<v Speaker 12>actually strike a balance between like kind of not cannibalizing

0:35:27.719 --> 0:35:31.759
<v Speaker 12>the existing business, but meanwhile making efforts to make sure

0:35:31.840 --> 0:35:34.759
<v Speaker 12>that they don't get this kind of extinct in the

0:35:35.440 --> 0:35:38.000
<v Speaker 12>new AI era. So, for example, AI, if you go

0:35:38.080 --> 0:35:40.319
<v Speaker 12>to Google Search right now, you see that they will

0:35:40.360 --> 0:35:45.120
<v Speaker 12>provide a AI generated search summary, and that's sort of

0:35:45.160 --> 0:35:49.120
<v Speaker 12>some of the efforts to help the company that migrates.

0:35:49.719 --> 0:35:52.520
<v Speaker 4>So if you're looking at opportunities in AI and China.

0:35:52.560 --> 0:35:55.759
<v Speaker 4>Are you more focused on the software side or are

0:35:55.840 --> 0:35:59.160
<v Speaker 4>you looking at the hardware story and maybe semiconductors. How

0:35:59.200 --> 0:35:59.719
<v Speaker 4>do you play it?

0:36:00.520 --> 0:36:01.040
<v Speaker 1>I think.

0:36:02.360 --> 0:36:05.759
<v Speaker 12>If you look at the semiconductor or hardware side, it's

0:36:05.840 --> 0:36:09.200
<v Speaker 12>very very focused in a few kind of companies that

0:36:09.239 --> 0:36:11.800
<v Speaker 12>have the technology. So by that, I mean, for example,

0:36:11.840 --> 0:36:14.360
<v Speaker 12>n video, Nvidia has the chips that are kind of

0:36:14.360 --> 0:36:17.120
<v Speaker 12>ways ahead. And if you look at all the recent

0:36:17.239 --> 0:36:20.680
<v Speaker 12>kind of announcements from big big tech companies like for example,

0:36:21.280 --> 0:36:24.120
<v Speaker 12>Metas big announcement of the data centers, I mean they

0:36:24.120 --> 0:36:27.400
<v Speaker 12>are still predominantly using uh in video technology.

0:36:27.880 --> 0:36:28.000
<v Speaker 11>UH.

0:36:28.040 --> 0:36:29.800
<v Speaker 5>If you look at kind of in China.

0:36:30.480 --> 0:36:34.600
<v Speaker 12>Of course, recently uh President Trump lifted the restriction to

0:36:34.680 --> 0:36:38.520
<v Speaker 12>export H twenty chips to China, and I mean Nvidia

0:36:38.760 --> 0:36:41.360
<v Speaker 12>is receiving a lot of orders and I mean the

0:36:41.480 --> 0:36:42.799
<v Speaker 12>citing supply shortages.

0:36:43.239 --> 0:36:45.640
<v Speaker 5>So still Nvidia is the kind of the.

0:36:45.600 --> 0:36:50.040
<v Speaker 12>Dominant player in the infrastructure layer. Of course, like companies

0:36:50.080 --> 0:36:52.600
<v Speaker 12>like Huawei are catching up, but I think they are

0:36:53.360 --> 0:36:56.880
<v Speaker 12>still kind of somewhat behind on the application side. I

0:36:56.920 --> 0:36:59.319
<v Speaker 12>think that's where it gets more interesting, right, because it's

0:36:59.320 --> 0:37:04.400
<v Speaker 12>not it's not that kind of dominated by one.

0:37:04.320 --> 0:37:05.040
<v Speaker 5>Or two players.

0:37:05.120 --> 0:37:07.080
<v Speaker 12>I think in the application side you can see a

0:37:07.120 --> 0:37:11.719
<v Speaker 12>lot of very creative uses of the underlying technology in

0:37:11.840 --> 0:37:15.960
<v Speaker 12>terms of driving usage, driving revenue, or cutting costs. And

0:37:16.040 --> 0:37:18.359
<v Speaker 12>here I think you can see that in the US

0:37:18.400 --> 0:37:22.840
<v Speaker 12>there are different companies in different verticals kind of it

0:37:22.880 --> 0:37:26.520
<v Speaker 12>GUS making big strides and also in China right if

0:37:26.560 --> 0:37:28.879
<v Speaker 12>you look at kind of the software companies, I think

0:37:28.920 --> 0:37:31.320
<v Speaker 12>they are one of the first to benefit from these

0:37:31.640 --> 0:37:35.000
<v Speaker 12>AI coding agents, for example, and these actually benefit a

0:37:35.040 --> 0:37:37.560
<v Speaker 12>lot more companies than just the infrastructure.

0:37:37.600 --> 0:37:41.560
<v Speaker 4>Later that was definitely young the CIO at Stashaway, I'm

0:37:41.600 --> 0:37:44.799
<v Speaker 4>Doug Chrisner. Catch us weekdays for the Daybreak as your podcast.

0:37:45.040 --> 0:37:47.880
<v Speaker 4>It's available wherever you get your podcast. Tom.

0:37:48.360 --> 0:37:50.520
<v Speaker 2>Thank you Doug. And that does it for this edition

0:37:50.560 --> 0:37:53.640
<v Speaker 2>of Bloomberg day Break Weekend. Join us again Monday morning,

0:37:53.680 --> 0:37:56.000
<v Speaker 2>five am Wall Street Time for the latest on markets

0:37:56.040 --> 0:37:58.719
<v Speaker 2>overseas and the news you need to start your day.

0:37:59.160 --> 0:38:00.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm Tom Buzzby.

0:38:00.239 --> 0:38:00.879
<v Speaker 5>Stay with us.

0:38:01.200 --> 0:38:04.359
<v Speaker 2>Top stories and global business headlines are coming up right now.