WEBVTT - The Seven Deadlies: Green With Envy

0:00:03.800 --> 0:00:06.680
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind from how Stuff

0:00:06.680 --> 0:00:13.560
<v Speaker 1>Works dot Com. Yeah, hey, welcome to Stuff to Blow

0:00:13.600 --> 0:00:16.120
<v Speaker 1>your Mind. My name is Robert Lamb and I'm Julie Douglas.

0:00:16.360 --> 0:00:18.960
<v Speaker 1>And in this podcast, we are continuing our journey through

0:00:19.040 --> 0:00:23.520
<v Speaker 1>the Seven Deadly Sins. Uh Yes. To what extent are

0:00:23.520 --> 0:00:27.400
<v Speaker 1>they sins? What extent are they detrimental to our lives?

0:00:27.840 --> 0:00:31.880
<v Speaker 1>To what extent are they evolutionary necessities. We're going to

0:00:31.960 --> 0:00:34.760
<v Speaker 1>continue to discuss all of this. So last time we

0:00:34.880 --> 0:00:39.440
<v Speaker 1>talked about pride. This time we're talking about envy, which

0:00:39.440 --> 0:00:42.720
<v Speaker 1>lines up nicely because in Dante's Purgatory, Dante has to

0:00:43.200 --> 0:00:46.800
<v Speaker 1>ascend this mountain of purgatory that connects Earth to the sky,

0:00:47.159 --> 0:00:49.640
<v Speaker 1>Earth to the heavens. At the top of this mountain

0:00:49.680 --> 0:00:52.400
<v Speaker 1>is the earthly paradise, and individuals that are going through

0:00:52.440 --> 0:00:56.280
<v Speaker 1>purgatory they have to work off each layer of sin

0:00:56.520 --> 0:01:00.400
<v Speaker 1>before they're to enter into the higher realms. So the

0:01:00.640 --> 0:01:02.760
<v Speaker 1>first level you end up going through a terrace on

0:01:02.800 --> 0:01:05.920
<v Speaker 1>this mountain. The first terrace deals with pride, and the

0:01:06.000 --> 0:01:09.600
<v Speaker 1>second Terrorists deals with invY. And it's interesting when one

0:01:09.680 --> 0:01:14.360
<v Speaker 1>travels to this imagined room, you find the envious shades

0:01:14.440 --> 0:01:17.280
<v Speaker 1>to these individuals who were who were very envious in life,

0:01:17.560 --> 0:01:19.640
<v Speaker 1>and they're gonna have to work this junk off before

0:01:19.680 --> 0:01:22.400
<v Speaker 1>they can they can rise higher. They're all leaning against

0:01:22.400 --> 0:01:24.959
<v Speaker 1>each other again and against boulders. They're all sort of

0:01:25.080 --> 0:01:30.200
<v Speaker 1>huddled around like beggars. As Dante comes closer, he finds

0:01:30.360 --> 0:01:34.200
<v Speaker 1>that their eyelids are sown shut with wire. Okay, yeah,

0:01:34.240 --> 0:01:37.800
<v Speaker 1>that seems reasonable because in the especially you know, are

0:01:37.880 --> 0:01:40.480
<v Speaker 1>under our are sort of figurative understanding of it. It's

0:01:40.480 --> 0:01:42.720
<v Speaker 1>all about the eyes, you know, green eyed envy. It's

0:01:42.720 --> 0:01:47.200
<v Speaker 1>about it's about looking at other things and covening. Um.

0:01:47.319 --> 0:01:50.240
<v Speaker 1>And so these individuals coveted in their lives, they looked

0:01:50.240 --> 0:01:52.720
<v Speaker 1>with with these envious eyes. And now all these envious

0:01:52.760 --> 0:01:56.360
<v Speaker 1>eyes are shut. See. I think that is the sort

0:01:56.400 --> 0:01:59.080
<v Speaker 1>of attention that envy should get, because it is it's

0:01:59.080 --> 0:02:01.640
<v Speaker 1>actually pretty important. And we I was, we were researching this.

0:02:01.720 --> 0:02:05.040
<v Speaker 1>I thought, this is really very interesting stuff. Um, and

0:02:05.200 --> 0:02:07.040
<v Speaker 1>you think it's exactly the kind of attention and we

0:02:07.080 --> 0:02:08.840
<v Speaker 1>should get. Well no, no, no, I don't actually have

0:02:08.919 --> 0:02:11.560
<v Speaker 1>their eyelids shown the sun shut. No, especially not with

0:02:11.600 --> 0:02:14.280
<v Speaker 1>wire thread. That's just that's just cruel. Well I was

0:02:14.320 --> 0:02:17.839
<v Speaker 1>really interesting enough side. Uh no, but apparently they would

0:02:17.880 --> 0:02:20.640
<v Speaker 1>take hawks and they would part of the training of

0:02:20.639 --> 0:02:23.840
<v Speaker 1>a hawk would be too so it's eyes shut with

0:02:24.200 --> 0:02:27.919
<v Speaker 1>with laces of gut like you know, tennis string or something,

0:02:27.960 --> 0:02:29.720
<v Speaker 1>and that was just part of training the hawk to

0:02:29.800 --> 0:02:32.360
<v Speaker 1>accept food from a human master. In all this so

0:02:32.760 --> 0:02:35.280
<v Speaker 1>right that it is not like the hawk was coveting

0:02:35.600 --> 0:02:38.119
<v Speaker 1>other hawks, right right. But it's interesting that that's where

0:02:38.120 --> 0:02:40.320
<v Speaker 1>that came from. It wasn't just Dante being morbid. And

0:02:40.360 --> 0:02:42.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean he's being a little more bid. He's Dante,

0:02:42.120 --> 0:02:44.240
<v Speaker 1>but but he he got the idea from the way

0:02:44.240 --> 0:02:47.400
<v Speaker 1>people trained at hawks. Well. But again, I think that

0:02:47.440 --> 0:02:51.000
<v Speaker 1>this is the sort of import that MV has. New

0:02:51.080 --> 0:02:53.960
<v Speaker 1>York Times writer John Turney actually was talking about it

0:02:54.160 --> 0:02:56.560
<v Speaker 1>being one of the seven sins and being kind of boring.

0:02:56.680 --> 0:02:59.120
<v Speaker 1>He said, at first, you know, for him, it was

0:02:59.160 --> 0:03:02.480
<v Speaker 1>the most useless of the deadly sins, excruciating to experience,

0:03:02.720 --> 0:03:06.720
<v Speaker 1>shameful to admit, bereft of immediate pleasure or long term benefits.

0:03:07.080 --> 0:03:10.079
<v Speaker 1>To an evolutionary psychologist, there's a certain logic to seducing

0:03:10.080 --> 0:03:12.760
<v Speaker 1>thy neighbor's wife or stealing his goods. But what's the

0:03:12.760 --> 0:03:16.040
<v Speaker 1>point of merely covering them. Yeah. Yeah, it was an

0:03:16.040 --> 0:03:18.160
<v Speaker 1>interesting point you made, because it is. It is not

0:03:18.360 --> 0:03:21.480
<v Speaker 1>a fun sin when you hear people talk about it.

0:03:21.520 --> 0:03:23.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna go out and say, you know, we're like

0:03:23.400 --> 0:03:26.560
<v Speaker 1>a carnival type deal where it's like I've got to

0:03:26.560 --> 0:03:29.440
<v Speaker 1>start being good tomorrow, but tonight I'm just gonna covet

0:03:29.480 --> 0:03:31.799
<v Speaker 1>my face off. Like nobody says that, you know, it's

0:03:32.040 --> 0:03:34.480
<v Speaker 1>all about the other vices. No one's like, Oh, I'm

0:03:34.480 --> 0:03:38.760
<v Speaker 1>gonna so the envious of bread pet tonight, it's gonna

0:03:38.800 --> 0:03:41.640
<v Speaker 1>be great right in front of you and I'm going

0:03:41.720 --> 0:03:46.680
<v Speaker 1>to cover you all up. Uh, but let's talk about

0:03:46.720 --> 0:03:48.640
<v Speaker 1>a belt's started to get into meat up in the

0:03:48.640 --> 0:03:51.440
<v Speaker 1>meat of it because some people think of it as jealousy,

0:03:51.480 --> 0:03:54.480
<v Speaker 1>but it actually is not jealousy. Um. Envy is more

0:03:54.520 --> 0:03:57.480
<v Speaker 1>of a longing for what you don't have, whereas jealousy

0:03:57.640 --> 0:04:01.040
<v Speaker 1>is more provoked by losing something that might have had

0:04:01.080 --> 0:04:04.400
<v Speaker 1>to someone else, Like like two people are competing for

0:04:04.400 --> 0:04:07.440
<v Speaker 1>a job and one gets it over the other, and

0:04:07.440 --> 0:04:09.680
<v Speaker 1>then the person who didn't get the job to be jealous.

0:04:10.320 --> 0:04:13.640
<v Speaker 1>And actually, envy comes from the Latin word in the invidiary,

0:04:14.160 --> 0:04:16.560
<v Speaker 1>which means to look at with malice or cast an

0:04:16.560 --> 0:04:19.160
<v Speaker 1>evil eye, which is sort of interesting when you were

0:04:19.160 --> 0:04:21.440
<v Speaker 1>talking about the sewing shuts of the eye. Again, it's

0:04:21.480 --> 0:04:24.800
<v Speaker 1>all relating back to that consumption. Um. And is there

0:04:24.839 --> 0:04:27.640
<v Speaker 1>an upside to this? It's kind of funny all the

0:04:27.680 --> 0:04:30.279
<v Speaker 1>other since there's a bit of an upside, but this one,

0:04:31.560 --> 0:04:32.800
<v Speaker 1>I have to say, this is a bit of a

0:04:32.920 --> 0:04:35.880
<v Speaker 1>dark side. And yes, there's an upside in the sense

0:04:35.920 --> 0:04:38.880
<v Speaker 1>that you can use envy along um. Let's say, if

0:04:38.920 --> 0:04:42.320
<v Speaker 1>you use the prism of admiration alongside with it, um,

0:04:42.360 --> 0:04:44.919
<v Speaker 1>you could be more likely to closely note how someone

0:04:45.000 --> 0:04:48.920
<v Speaker 1>behaves or has attained his or her success and then

0:04:48.960 --> 0:04:51.920
<v Speaker 1>try to emulate that and create these conditions for yourself. Yeah,

0:04:51.920 --> 0:04:53.760
<v Speaker 1>you end up with the with these two different versions

0:04:53.760 --> 0:04:55.599
<v Speaker 1>of envy. You have a benign envying, you have a

0:04:55.600 --> 0:04:58.960
<v Speaker 1>malicious on the benign and v I just for consistency sake,

0:04:59.040 --> 0:05:01.640
<v Speaker 1>I looked up in the Ascetaic Bible to see what

0:05:01.640 --> 0:05:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Anton LaVey had to say about Of course, yeah, he's

0:05:03.760 --> 0:05:05.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, it was very much making kind of a

0:05:05.520 --> 0:05:10.360
<v Speaker 1>new age argument for for these various sins and against

0:05:10.440 --> 0:05:13.719
<v Speaker 1>organized religion and and uh. He said that envy needs

0:05:13.760 --> 0:05:15.880
<v Speaker 1>to look with favor upon the positions of others, and

0:05:15.880 --> 0:05:19.800
<v Speaker 1>to be desirous of desirous of obtaining similar things for oneself.

0:05:19.920 --> 0:05:22.360
<v Speaker 1>And if he and greed are the motivating forces of ambition,

0:05:22.400 --> 0:05:25.960
<v Speaker 1>and without ambition, very little of any importance would be accomplished.

0:05:26.680 --> 0:05:29.680
<v Speaker 1>And that's a valid goat hats aside, that's a that's

0:05:29.680 --> 0:05:32.599
<v Speaker 1>a valid argument, you know, because because you think of

0:05:32.640 --> 0:05:35.080
<v Speaker 1>the people in life that you look at our heroes

0:05:35.960 --> 0:05:38.840
<v Speaker 1>and uh, and there's a certain amount of envy there.

0:05:38.880 --> 0:05:40.840
<v Speaker 1>You're like, man that you know that dude is an

0:05:40.880 --> 0:05:43.400
<v Speaker 1>awesome writer. I wish I had had skills like that.

0:05:43.720 --> 0:05:45.840
<v Speaker 1>But but in many cases it takes on that that

0:05:45.880 --> 0:05:48.240
<v Speaker 1>form of I'm gonna really look at what this guy's doing.

0:05:48.640 --> 0:05:51.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to try and emulate how he approaches his art,

0:05:52.120 --> 0:05:55.279
<v Speaker 1>and then I'm going to be better for it, you know. Yeah,

0:05:55.360 --> 0:05:57.680
<v Speaker 1>And that's what I think. It's interesting about envyous So

0:05:57.839 --> 0:05:59.920
<v Speaker 1>much of it is predicated on your ability to him

0:06:00.000 --> 0:06:05.520
<v Speaker 1>imagine your life, a future life for yourself. And again

0:06:05.560 --> 0:06:07.520
<v Speaker 1>that's where the benign comes in. If you could look

0:06:07.520 --> 0:06:11.080
<v Speaker 1>at someone and say, I feel motivated by this person. Uh,

0:06:11.080 --> 0:06:13.200
<v Speaker 1>there are things that this person has that I want

0:06:13.279 --> 0:06:16.560
<v Speaker 1>that that fit along with what makes sense in my

0:06:16.640 --> 0:06:19.600
<v Speaker 1>life or what's really important to me. Obviously, the malicious

0:06:19.640 --> 0:06:24.720
<v Speaker 1>part comes uh into play when you pay attention to

0:06:24.880 --> 0:06:27.280
<v Speaker 1>people who you feel like are superior to you too,

0:06:27.320 --> 0:06:31.400
<v Speaker 1>to the point where, uh you wish that things would

0:06:31.400 --> 0:06:34.440
<v Speaker 1>happen to these people, Um that you began to resent people.

0:06:34.880 --> 0:06:39.760
<v Speaker 1>You spend way too much mental energy on obsessing about something,

0:06:39.800 --> 0:06:42.480
<v Speaker 1>and that obsession is really at the core of this. Yes,

0:06:42.560 --> 0:06:45.839
<v Speaker 1>a malicious envy becomes. It's it's not as much a

0:06:46.080 --> 0:06:48.040
<v Speaker 1>I really admire that person I want to be like them.

0:06:48.040 --> 0:06:51.000
<v Speaker 1>It's more like I really admire that person or not

0:06:51.000 --> 0:06:52.960
<v Speaker 1>as much I admire them, and like that person has

0:06:53.000 --> 0:06:55.400
<v Speaker 1>things I wish I had. I can't have them, but

0:06:55.520 --> 0:06:58.000
<v Speaker 1>stabbing them would still would still feel pretty good. If

0:06:58.000 --> 0:07:00.280
<v Speaker 1>I can't, If I can't achieve that level aim, I

0:07:00.320 --> 0:07:03.600
<v Speaker 1>could at least take that level of fame from them,

0:07:03.600 --> 0:07:07.160
<v Speaker 1>which on the surface sounds just insane, but as well,

0:07:07.160 --> 0:07:08.719
<v Speaker 1>as we'll discuss if if you kind of break it

0:07:08.760 --> 0:07:13.320
<v Speaker 1>down you can you can find some potential evolutionary advantages

0:07:13.480 --> 0:07:15.440
<v Speaker 1>in that as well. Right well, I mean, what you're

0:07:15.440 --> 0:07:17.200
<v Speaker 1>trying to do is find their weakness so that you

0:07:17.240 --> 0:07:19.920
<v Speaker 1>can bring them back down to your your level, right,

0:07:20.040 --> 0:07:23.800
<v Speaker 1>so in essential leveling the playing field. Right, It's kind

0:07:23.800 --> 0:07:26.240
<v Speaker 1>of like, all that person is an awesome runner. My

0:07:26.440 --> 0:07:29.600
<v Speaker 1>benign envy says I can train up and become as

0:07:29.640 --> 0:07:32.360
<v Speaker 1>good a runner as they are and maybe, you know,

0:07:32.400 --> 0:07:34.240
<v Speaker 1>get a little faster and beat them. The other one

0:07:34.280 --> 0:07:35.800
<v Speaker 1>is like, I will never be as good a runner

0:07:36.320 --> 0:07:38.680
<v Speaker 1>as they are, but I bet if I cut their

0:07:38.680 --> 0:07:42.640
<v Speaker 1>tendons with a knife then I could easily outrun them.

0:07:42.680 --> 0:07:46.240
<v Speaker 1>Either way, each scenario ends with me winning the race.

0:07:46.520 --> 0:07:49.400
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of the Tanya Harding effect, right, like, Wow,

0:07:49.440 --> 0:07:51.560
<v Speaker 1>you're such a great skater, I'm just gonna hit you

0:07:51.560 --> 0:07:56.120
<v Speaker 1>in the in the knees and break your knees. Um. So, yeah,

0:07:56.160 --> 0:07:59.240
<v Speaker 1>there's malicious, there's benign. And it turns out that in

0:07:59.360 --> 0:08:02.960
<v Speaker 1>memories to auties, this sort of envy really plays into

0:08:03.080 --> 0:08:07.200
<v Speaker 1>our ability to remember details about people. Um. There have

0:08:07.240 --> 0:08:10.800
<v Speaker 1>been experiments with envy a students at Texas Christian University

0:08:10.800 --> 0:08:13.760
<v Speaker 1>and Fort Worth and the University of Texas at Austin, Texas,

0:08:13.800 --> 0:08:16.520
<v Speaker 1>and researchers bore out the conclusion that students who read

0:08:16.560 --> 0:08:21.320
<v Speaker 1>stories about envy inducing characters had far better recall than

0:08:21.480 --> 0:08:26.080
<v Speaker 1>non envy inducing characters. Again, here's your mind really dwelling

0:08:26.120 --> 0:08:29.320
<v Speaker 1>on this person and what they have or what they

0:08:29.360 --> 0:08:33.120
<v Speaker 1>don't have, what you don't have. And it also turns

0:08:33.160 --> 0:08:37.080
<v Speaker 1>out that, um, there's a bit of ego depletion involved

0:08:37.080 --> 0:08:40.120
<v Speaker 1>in this. So it ends up actually wearing down your

0:08:40.280 --> 0:08:42.560
<v Speaker 1>mental faculties. Yeah, and we talked about this, We talked

0:08:42.559 --> 0:08:45.079
<v Speaker 1>about ego depletion. Is is um, one of the things

0:08:45.160 --> 0:08:48.680
<v Speaker 1>that happens when decision fatigue. You have to make up

0:08:48.720 --> 0:08:50.800
<v Speaker 1>all these decisions about what goes on my sandwich, whatever

0:08:51.080 --> 0:08:53.960
<v Speaker 1>music I'm gonna listen to, you know how, I'm gonna

0:08:53.960 --> 0:08:56.000
<v Speaker 1>get to work, and by the end of the day,

0:08:56.040 --> 0:09:01.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm not able to really tackle difficult cognitive problems exactly

0:09:01.200 --> 0:09:04.480
<v Speaker 1>because you you're suffering from ego depletion. So another study

0:09:04.520 --> 0:09:07.320
<v Speaker 1>this is this the same group of researchers. They had

0:09:07.320 --> 0:09:10.360
<v Speaker 1>students contemplating a wealthy, attractive peer, and then students were

0:09:10.400 --> 0:09:13.880
<v Speaker 1>asked to work on puzzles and compared with the control group,

0:09:14.000 --> 0:09:16.839
<v Speaker 1>they gave up much sooner, which is the same thing

0:09:16.840 --> 0:09:19.840
<v Speaker 1>that we saw with the decision fatigue and the people

0:09:19.880 --> 0:09:22.880
<v Speaker 1>that had to make up all those decisions or make

0:09:22.960 --> 0:09:25.160
<v Speaker 1>all those decisions, and then we're later given a self

0:09:25.200 --> 0:09:29.360
<v Speaker 1>control test and those people I remember this is something

0:09:29.400 --> 0:09:31.160
<v Speaker 1>like they had to put their hands in ice water,

0:09:31.840 --> 0:09:34.280
<v Speaker 1>and those people had were able to put their hands

0:09:34.280 --> 0:09:37.600
<v Speaker 1>in ice water for half the time than the control groups.

0:09:37.600 --> 0:09:41.520
<v Speaker 1>So again you're seeing parallels here with the eroding of

0:09:41.520 --> 0:09:45.560
<v Speaker 1>of um, your mental faculties, of which honestly, we only

0:09:45.559 --> 0:09:48.440
<v Speaker 1>have a finite amount of mental energy per day, right,

0:09:48.480 --> 0:09:49.960
<v Speaker 1>so it's how are you going to spend it? Are

0:09:49.960 --> 0:09:54.000
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna waste it sort of dreamily staring at this

0:09:54.080 --> 0:09:58.319
<v Speaker 1>other person's life or worth stabbing them in your imagination?

0:09:58.400 --> 0:10:02.000
<v Speaker 1>And and the thing is they whole, They're just all

0:10:02.040 --> 0:10:03.480
<v Speaker 1>you have to do is go through the checkoutline at

0:10:03.520 --> 0:10:07.080
<v Speaker 1>the grocery store, and and whole industries thrive on on

0:10:07.200 --> 0:10:10.000
<v Speaker 1>injy um. I mean, all these tabloids about what's the

0:10:10.000 --> 0:10:13.760
<v Speaker 1>celebrity doing, what's this celebrity buying, what's the celebrity's of

0:10:13.800 --> 0:10:16.120
<v Speaker 1>personal life consists of? And mean you walk by it

0:10:16.200 --> 0:10:18.080
<v Speaker 1>and you're just like, what how do people fill their

0:10:18.160 --> 0:10:21.280
<v Speaker 1>days with this? You just just gaze into this, Uh,

0:10:21.400 --> 0:10:25.360
<v Speaker 1>the celebrity of this. There's one magazine that the I

0:10:25.400 --> 0:10:27.960
<v Speaker 1>don't know if it's us or something. But I remember

0:10:28.480 --> 0:10:31.000
<v Speaker 1>flipping through it once and they have a section called

0:10:31.040 --> 0:10:35.320
<v Speaker 1>celebrities they're just like us, And it just completely cracked

0:10:35.320 --> 0:10:37.240
<v Speaker 1>me up because it was like, this person wears a

0:10:37.280 --> 0:10:40.719
<v Speaker 1>sweatshirt when they're going to the store, too, and so

0:10:40.840 --> 0:10:43.640
<v Speaker 1>it reminded me of this this idea that's not quite

0:10:43.640 --> 0:10:46.240
<v Speaker 1>schaden freud. Yeah, but it's sort of like, well, they

0:10:46.280 --> 0:10:48.840
<v Speaker 1>look kind of schleppy sometimes too. That makes me feel

0:10:48.840 --> 0:10:51.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot better. Yeah, well, yeah, it's not quite personally, Yeah,

0:10:52.000 --> 0:10:53.520
<v Speaker 1>but no, I understand what you're saying. It's not they're

0:10:53.520 --> 0:10:55.959
<v Speaker 1>not it's not quite I hate this person. I want

0:10:55.960 --> 0:10:57.760
<v Speaker 1>to see him stabbed. It's like I'm taking comfort in

0:10:57.760 --> 0:11:00.680
<v Speaker 1>the fact that this person is mortal as well, and

0:11:00.800 --> 0:11:03.160
<v Speaker 1>uh and and is open to the same flaws and

0:11:03.240 --> 0:11:05.880
<v Speaker 1>normalities that I am. Well, and it turns out that

0:11:06.000 --> 0:11:09.559
<v Speaker 1>envy and chitten freud are actually linked, researchers think, and

0:11:09.600 --> 0:11:11.679
<v Speaker 1>we'll talk about that in one minute when we come back.

0:11:16.720 --> 0:11:23.160
<v Speaker 1>All right, we're back, um, which is an interesting concept

0:11:23.280 --> 0:11:27.960
<v Speaker 1>and one that you actually find some theologians discussing Thomas

0:11:28.040 --> 0:11:33.720
<v Speaker 1>aquinas Um in uh Suma Theologica said, wherefore, in order

0:11:33.760 --> 0:11:36.480
<v Speaker 1>that the happiness of the saints may be more delightful

0:11:36.520 --> 0:11:39.960
<v Speaker 1>to them, and they may render more copious thanks to

0:11:40.040 --> 0:11:43.240
<v Speaker 1>God for it. Uh, they are allowed to see perfectly

0:11:43.440 --> 0:11:46.000
<v Speaker 1>the sufferings of the damned. So we're talking about saints

0:11:46.000 --> 0:11:48.440
<v Speaker 1>being able to see people's torments in hell. And then

0:11:48.480 --> 0:11:52.040
<v Speaker 1>there was I ran across another example where Jonathan Edwards,

0:11:52.080 --> 0:11:54.320
<v Speaker 1>the author of Center in the Hands of an angry God,

0:11:54.800 --> 0:11:57.280
<v Speaker 1>he was making pretty much the same argument. The view

0:11:57.480 --> 0:11:59.880
<v Speaker 1>of the misery of the dam will double the ardor

0:12:00.160 --> 0:12:03.160
<v Speaker 1>of the love and gratitude of the saints in heaven. Forth,

0:12:03.200 --> 0:12:06.160
<v Speaker 1>the sight of hell torments will exalt the happiness of

0:12:06.160 --> 0:12:08.440
<v Speaker 1>the saints forever. It will not only make them more

0:12:08.480 --> 0:12:11.640
<v Speaker 1>sensible of the greatness and the freeness of the grace

0:12:11.679 --> 0:12:14.120
<v Speaker 1>of God and their happiness, but it will really make

0:12:14.160 --> 0:12:16.840
<v Speaker 1>their happiness the greater, as it will make them more

0:12:16.880 --> 0:12:20.880
<v Speaker 1>sensible of their own happiness, which sounds kind of nuts, yeah,

0:12:20.960 --> 0:12:25.280
<v Speaker 1>kind yeah, yeah, but yeah, I mean there's this idea

0:12:25.360 --> 0:12:30.040
<v Speaker 1>of Schipenfreud of um sort of lowering the veil of perfection, right,

0:12:30.120 --> 0:12:33.640
<v Speaker 1>And uh, if if it's someone you emvvery they seem

0:12:33.720 --> 0:12:35.960
<v Speaker 1>like they're just bulletproof. And then all of a sudden

0:12:36.000 --> 0:12:37.679
<v Speaker 1>you see that they've got a chink in their armor,

0:12:38.840 --> 0:12:42.240
<v Speaker 1>and it's it's the tabloid thing again. It's like, let

0:12:42.240 --> 0:12:46.160
<v Speaker 1>me see my heroes in unflattering swimsuits, let me see

0:12:46.200 --> 0:12:49.320
<v Speaker 1>them making mistakes, let me see them growing older. And

0:12:49.360 --> 0:12:52.720
<v Speaker 1>I always find a morbid fascination in the phrasing of that,

0:12:52.760 --> 0:12:55.920
<v Speaker 1>because it's, uh, if if it's somebody that the reader

0:12:55.920 --> 0:12:58.719
<v Speaker 1>of the tabloid is meant to like, it is, it's

0:12:58.760 --> 0:13:03.200
<v Speaker 1>always like so and so's brave last days, Like like

0:13:03.200 --> 0:13:05.680
<v Speaker 1>I think Elizabeth Taylor was having brave last Days for

0:13:06.160 --> 0:13:09.840
<v Speaker 1>like half a decade. But then other people, it's just

0:13:09.880 --> 0:13:11.880
<v Speaker 1>the language is always far worse, like oh, they're just

0:13:11.920 --> 0:13:14.000
<v Speaker 1>they're just on the verge of death, you know. And

0:13:14.000 --> 0:13:17.400
<v Speaker 1>and and people eat it up because it's they're getting

0:13:17.400 --> 0:13:21.240
<v Speaker 1>to see their their heroes fall there, their gods are

0:13:21.280 --> 0:13:23.680
<v Speaker 1>are brought down to their level. And then, well, isn't

0:13:23.679 --> 0:13:25.920
<v Speaker 1>it the whole problem? I guess you could say the

0:13:25.920 --> 0:13:29.520
<v Speaker 1>problem of our existence is at our our consciousness and

0:13:29.920 --> 0:13:31.760
<v Speaker 1>the sense that we know we're all going to die

0:13:31.880 --> 0:13:35.120
<v Speaker 1>some days. So yeah, at a very basic level, it's like, hey,

0:13:35.160 --> 0:13:37.880
<v Speaker 1>this is happening. I know, what's gonna happen for me

0:13:37.960 --> 0:13:41.600
<v Speaker 1>is gonna it's happened to this person, but birthday candles

0:13:41.640 --> 0:13:42.920
<v Speaker 1>to bring it back to that, what's going to happen

0:13:42.960 --> 0:13:45.000
<v Speaker 1>when we reached the point where the first celebrity that

0:13:45.000 --> 0:13:48.000
<v Speaker 1>everyone hates is like, and guess what, guys, I'm living forever?

0:13:49.040 --> 0:13:53.199
<v Speaker 1>And then I mean I think rise up among the

0:13:53.440 --> 0:13:56.920
<v Speaker 1>tabloid readers will just be immense. I think our example

0:13:57.320 --> 0:13:59.800
<v Speaker 1>for that episode was Charlie Sheen. Yeah, I don't think

0:13:59.840 --> 0:14:02.440
<v Speaker 1>my just changed since we recorded that. Um if there's

0:14:02.440 --> 0:14:04.640
<v Speaker 1>anybody else that could replace them. But I want to

0:14:04.640 --> 0:14:07.800
<v Speaker 1>tell you about a study about envy and schaden freud

0:14:07.880 --> 0:14:10.840
<v Speaker 1>and um it has a great title. Actually, it's called

0:14:10.840 --> 0:14:12.880
<v Speaker 1>when your gain is my pain and your pain is

0:14:12.920 --> 0:14:17.160
<v Speaker 1>my gain Neural correlates correlates of envy and schaden freud.

0:14:17.240 --> 0:14:20.280
<v Speaker 1>And this is a study by Haidahiko Takahishi, which we

0:14:20.320 --> 0:14:23.360
<v Speaker 1>talked about him in the Pride episode. UM So he

0:14:23.440 --> 0:14:27.160
<v Speaker 1>and some other researchers set out to to research this

0:14:27.400 --> 0:14:30.200
<v Speaker 1>and this was there um part of their in their

0:14:30.240 --> 0:14:33.600
<v Speaker 1>abstract that said, we often evaluate the self and others

0:14:33.600 --> 0:14:36.600
<v Speaker 1>from social comparisons. We feel emvy when the target person

0:14:36.680 --> 0:14:41.720
<v Speaker 1>has superior and self relevant characteristics. Schanden Freud occurs when

0:14:41.880 --> 0:14:44.560
<v Speaker 1>envied persons fall from grace and they go on a

0:14:44.600 --> 0:14:47.560
<v Speaker 1>bit and then they say, are finding document mechanisms of

0:14:47.720 --> 0:14:52.440
<v Speaker 1>painful emotion and the rewarding reaction shaden Freud. It's really

0:14:52.480 --> 0:14:54.320
<v Speaker 1>fascinating what they did here, And if you guys can

0:14:54.320 --> 0:14:56.040
<v Speaker 1>just kind of bear with me as I talk a

0:14:56.120 --> 0:14:58.560
<v Speaker 1>bit about the details. UM, because they did two different

0:14:58.600 --> 0:15:01.920
<v Speaker 1>studies that relate together. They had nineteen subjects that were

0:15:01.920 --> 0:15:05.680
<v Speaker 1>asked to visualize being a protagonist in scenarios that college

0:15:05.680 --> 0:15:09.280
<v Speaker 1>students might faceball undergoing UM an m R I. So

0:15:09.520 --> 0:15:12.520
<v Speaker 1>they have these scenarios that they're they're inserting themselves into

0:15:12.600 --> 0:15:17.040
<v Speaker 1>as the protagonist and UH. For example, UM, the following scenario,

0:15:17.120 --> 0:15:19.960
<v Speaker 1>a male subject was asked to imagine himself as a protagonist.

0:15:20.400 --> 0:15:23.600
<v Speaker 1>Student A, this is the person that they're invying, did

0:15:23.600 --> 0:15:26.480
<v Speaker 1>well in his final examinations, but the protagonist did not.

0:15:26.920 --> 0:15:29.880
<v Speaker 1>Student A is talented in baseball, but the protagonist is not.

0:15:30.360 --> 0:15:33.400
<v Speaker 1>Student A is popular among girls and has a beautiful

0:15:33.400 --> 0:15:37.560
<v Speaker 1>and intelligent girlfriend, but protagonist is not popular and does

0:15:37.680 --> 0:15:41.000
<v Speaker 1>not have a steady girlfriend. So they go on to

0:15:41.040 --> 0:15:44.000
<v Speaker 1>say student A successful in a job interview and getting

0:15:44.040 --> 0:15:46.400
<v Speaker 1>along really well the company he wants to join. The

0:15:46.400 --> 0:15:49.760
<v Speaker 1>protagonist is not. The salary is great for Student A.

0:15:50.080 --> 0:15:53.160
<v Speaker 1>He has a luxury condominium downtown. Okay, it just gets

0:15:53.160 --> 0:15:57.160
<v Speaker 1>worse and worse for for protagonist. Takahashi had the subject

0:15:57.160 --> 0:16:01.400
<v Speaker 1>imagine as schaden Freud evoking scenario then in which the

0:16:01.400 --> 0:16:05.000
<v Speaker 1>protagonist is then doing much better than Student A, and

0:16:05.120 --> 0:16:08.320
<v Speaker 1>the scenarios are were varied to include the gender of

0:16:08.320 --> 0:16:11.840
<v Speaker 1>the subject UM and other students might be assigned the

0:16:11.880 --> 0:16:15.480
<v Speaker 1>same gender as the subject to help them relate right um.

0:16:15.600 --> 0:16:18.680
<v Speaker 1>And also details were changed so that there would be

0:16:18.720 --> 0:16:22.200
<v Speaker 1>a degree of similarity between the imagined student A and

0:16:22.240 --> 0:16:26.520
<v Speaker 1>the protagonist. So analysis of the resulting brain scans compared

0:16:26.560 --> 0:16:30.240
<v Speaker 1>the activation in different brain regions under envy invoking and

0:16:30.280 --> 0:16:33.840
<v Speaker 1>then Schadenfreud evoking and then neutral scenarios, so they could

0:16:33.840 --> 0:16:37.680
<v Speaker 1>test this out and controlled type situation. UM, and then

0:16:37.680 --> 0:16:40.200
<v Speaker 1>the subjects were asked to rate their relative feelings of envy.

0:16:40.240 --> 0:16:43.040
<v Speaker 1>And they're gloating in the scenario, so this is okay,

0:16:43.040 --> 0:16:45.040
<v Speaker 1>this is all okay, Yeah, yeah, I get it. They're

0:16:45.080 --> 0:16:47.760
<v Speaker 1>they're really trying to set this up. Um, This is

0:16:47.760 --> 0:16:51.040
<v Speaker 1>where it gets interesting. The envy producing scenario showed activation

0:16:51.120 --> 0:16:53.680
<v Speaker 1>in the anterior singulate cortex, and that's the place in

0:16:53.720 --> 0:16:57.320
<v Speaker 1>the brain that's associated with error detection or conflict, which

0:16:57.360 --> 0:17:01.400
<v Speaker 1>was also activated by pain. Said. The conclusion here is

0:17:01.440 --> 0:17:05.639
<v Speaker 1>that people experiencing envy, which is associated with shame, or

0:17:05.680 --> 0:17:10.680
<v Speaker 1>feeling emotional pain or the pain of social exclusion, which

0:17:10.720 --> 0:17:13.680
<v Speaker 1>I found fascinating because here's just part of your brain

0:17:14.040 --> 0:17:17.639
<v Speaker 1>that that is really sis to perceive physical pain. But

0:17:18.119 --> 0:17:20.920
<v Speaker 1>if you are envying someone, you're actually feeling some sort

0:17:20.920 --> 0:17:24.159
<v Speaker 1>of emotional pain from your envy. And we have to

0:17:24.160 --> 0:17:26.960
<v Speaker 1>think back to the purpose of pain itself as the

0:17:27.359 --> 0:17:31.440
<v Speaker 1>my my body is feeling pain, therefore something is wrong

0:17:31.520 --> 0:17:34.520
<v Speaker 1>and must be addressed or avoided. Like there's a stick

0:17:34.720 --> 0:17:38.920
<v Speaker 1>jabbing into my thigh, I should remove said stick. My

0:17:39.000 --> 0:17:42.040
<v Speaker 1>stomach is hurting. Whatever I ate is bad and I

0:17:42.040 --> 0:17:45.159
<v Speaker 1>should probably not eat it again. So we have to

0:17:45.200 --> 0:17:48.560
<v Speaker 1>take that and extrapolate it into the into social dynamics.

0:17:48.960 --> 0:17:51.680
<v Speaker 1>You're feeling this emotional pain. I am not as good

0:17:51.720 --> 0:17:54.760
<v Speaker 1>as they are. I'm not feeling that my self worth

0:17:55.600 --> 0:17:58.919
<v Speaker 1>is really taken a hit here. I should become as

0:17:58.960 --> 0:18:01.280
<v Speaker 1>good as them. I should I should rise above them,

0:18:01.359 --> 0:18:05.640
<v Speaker 1>I should stab them in the thigh. You know, well,

0:18:05.680 --> 0:18:08.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's the stabbing is the purest form of

0:18:08.680 --> 0:18:11.960
<v Speaker 1>malicious envy, I think. Well, okay, so this is the

0:18:12.040 --> 0:18:15.359
<v Speaker 1>other interesting part of this is that when they had

0:18:15.240 --> 0:18:18.879
<v Speaker 1>the downfall of student A, they saw activation in the

0:18:18.960 --> 0:18:24.159
<v Speaker 1>ventral striatom, which is as associated with rewarding stimuli, and

0:18:24.200 --> 0:18:28.159
<v Speaker 1>so Takahashi interpret the activation with schadenfreud as a feeling

0:18:28.200 --> 0:18:32.639
<v Speaker 1>of pleasure, which makes sense, right, um, So they feel

0:18:32.680 --> 0:18:36.159
<v Speaker 1>like there are correlates here. You know that m vy

0:18:36.240 --> 0:18:39.080
<v Speaker 1>and Schenfreud go hand in hand. The other thing that

0:18:39.440 --> 0:18:43.200
<v Speaker 1>correlated with this is that if the student or the

0:18:43.560 --> 0:18:46.480
<v Speaker 1>person in this um, I should say that the protagonist,

0:18:46.680 --> 0:18:48.879
<v Speaker 1>the person in the study, if they did not feel

0:18:48.920 --> 0:18:51.960
<v Speaker 1>any sort of kinship with this person, did not feel

0:18:52.600 --> 0:18:56.840
<v Speaker 1>that they were at all on the same level and

0:18:56.880 --> 0:18:59.920
<v Speaker 1>that they couldn't imagine themselves in habiting this person's world.

0:19:00.400 --> 0:19:03.119
<v Speaker 1>They did not feel any envy, They did not have

0:19:03.160 --> 0:19:07.560
<v Speaker 1>any activation in the interior singulate cortex or in the

0:19:07.600 --> 0:19:10.680
<v Speaker 1>ventral striatom when they were when they had the shade

0:19:10.720 --> 0:19:12.520
<v Speaker 1>fraud scenario. So you have to be able to put

0:19:12.560 --> 0:19:15.200
<v Speaker 1>yourself in their shoes to some extent to actually take

0:19:15.200 --> 0:19:17.960
<v Speaker 1>pleasure in their downfall. You have to imagine this life

0:19:18.000 --> 0:19:21.560
<v Speaker 1>for yourself because even though there might be some great

0:19:21.600 --> 0:19:24.760
<v Speaker 1>object that someone has in their possession, if you don't

0:19:24.800 --> 0:19:27.159
<v Speaker 1>somehow connect with that person, to relate with that person,

0:19:27.440 --> 0:19:30.800
<v Speaker 1>then it doesn't matter to you. So you you know what,

0:19:30.960 --> 0:19:34.119
<v Speaker 1>that could be a myriad things, right, It could be um,

0:19:34.240 --> 0:19:37.240
<v Speaker 1>they have socio economic background. Um, it could be the

0:19:37.359 --> 0:19:39.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of music they listened to. Um. But it makes

0:19:40.000 --> 0:19:43.400
<v Speaker 1>sense that in a workplace scenario, why there might be

0:19:43.520 --> 0:19:46.760
<v Speaker 1>more instances of envy because in a workplace scenario, you're

0:19:46.800 --> 0:19:50.879
<v Speaker 1>more likely to connect or not necessarily connect, but to um, Well,

0:19:50.920 --> 0:19:53.000
<v Speaker 1>they're in your world. They're they're in your world. That's

0:19:53.119 --> 0:19:56.720
<v Speaker 1>right there. They're on your playing field. So that was

0:19:56.720 --> 0:20:03.199
<v Speaker 1>really fascinating about this study. But not only that, there's neuroscientists. Um.

0:20:03.359 --> 0:20:05.920
<v Speaker 1>They're taking the findings of the activation of the anterior

0:20:05.960 --> 0:20:09.720
<v Speaker 1>singulate cortex. Again, this is where the pain physical pain

0:20:09.840 --> 0:20:14.120
<v Speaker 1>would usually light up activation of the brain, and they're

0:20:14.160 --> 0:20:17.400
<v Speaker 1>saying that it's an indication of development of complex emotions,

0:20:17.520 --> 0:20:21.960
<v Speaker 1>piggybacking off the primal brain system. So that's the rat

0:20:22.000 --> 0:20:24.800
<v Speaker 1>like hind brain. Yes, yeah, yeah, So what they're saying

0:20:24.840 --> 0:20:27.080
<v Speaker 1>is that that that this could point to um, not

0:20:27.280 --> 0:20:30.159
<v Speaker 1>us developing more complex systems in order to deal with

0:20:30.200 --> 0:20:34.200
<v Speaker 1>more complex feelings, but really piggybacking off these primal feelings.

0:20:34.720 --> 0:20:37.439
<v Speaker 1>It's the it's the brain is an ice cream scoop again,

0:20:37.480 --> 0:20:40.240
<v Speaker 1>you know the idea that that it's just one more

0:20:40.240 --> 0:20:44.920
<v Speaker 1>scoop added to the brain evolves. Yeah, not not an

0:20:44.960 --> 0:20:49.200
<v Speaker 1>overall rehall of the system. It's not a banana split.

0:20:49.400 --> 0:20:52.119
<v Speaker 1>It's an ice cream cone. Yet, you know double degger. Well,

0:20:52.119 --> 0:20:54.199
<v Speaker 1>I can't speak for most work places, but we do

0:20:54.280 --> 0:20:59.640
<v Speaker 1>have relatively few stabbings here at the Work's true. Yeah, um,

0:20:59.680 --> 0:21:02.040
<v Speaker 1>there's no a lot of meaning going on here. Um.

0:21:02.080 --> 0:21:03.879
<v Speaker 1>And I'm going to say that's I'm going to go

0:21:03.880 --> 0:21:05.960
<v Speaker 1>out on a limb here and say that's probably because

0:21:07.119 --> 0:21:09.280
<v Speaker 1>there are not a whole lot of people, as far

0:21:09.320 --> 0:21:13.199
<v Speaker 1>as I know, that are morally disengaged. And when I

0:21:13.240 --> 0:21:15.800
<v Speaker 1>say morally disengaged, I don't need to say like cool,

0:21:16.320 --> 0:21:18.640
<v Speaker 1>they're you know, good or bad people. I'm talking about

0:21:18.640 --> 0:21:22.200
<v Speaker 1>it more in the sense of UM. A study that

0:21:22.280 --> 0:21:25.679
<v Speaker 1>was called the social context model and being social undermining,

0:21:25.760 --> 0:21:29.479
<v Speaker 1>and it was in the Academy of Management journal, and

0:21:29.520 --> 0:21:32.359
<v Speaker 1>they were saying that if if an employee feels morally

0:21:32.400 --> 0:21:36.120
<v Speaker 1>disengaged at work, so they're feeling disconnected from other core

0:21:36.280 --> 0:21:39.560
<v Speaker 1>co workers, they are far more likely to not just

0:21:39.800 --> 0:21:42.440
<v Speaker 1>envy co workers with whom they feel they have similarities.

0:21:42.520 --> 0:21:46.959
<v Speaker 1>Again that's really important, but they would actually act on

0:21:47.000 --> 0:21:49.760
<v Speaker 1>those on those uh thoughts of envy and try to

0:21:49.800 --> 0:21:55.160
<v Speaker 1>sabotage them. Interesting. So, potentially, say an office where individuals

0:21:55.200 --> 0:21:57.359
<v Speaker 1>don't have much of contact with one another, they would

0:21:57.400 --> 0:21:59.600
<v Speaker 1>there would be more likely to be a morally disengaged

0:21:59.680 --> 0:22:02.480
<v Speaker 1>I would, Well, it kind of depends on the person. Uh,

0:22:02.520 --> 0:22:06.320
<v Speaker 1>it's it may just be that they feel disinfranchised or

0:22:06.359 --> 0:22:08.520
<v Speaker 1>they just don't feel connected, because I think a lot

0:22:08.560 --> 0:22:12.560
<v Speaker 1>of us now work remotely, but we still have relationships, uh,

0:22:12.600 --> 0:22:15.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, thanks to the magic and the power of

0:22:15.040 --> 0:22:18.320
<v Speaker 1>the internet. Right. Um. But what they did is they

0:22:18.359 --> 0:22:22.320
<v Speaker 1>looked at a hundred and sixty employees um from a

0:22:22.440 --> 0:22:26.639
<v Speaker 1>Midwest American hospital and they tested whether the person had

0:22:26.640 --> 0:22:29.680
<v Speaker 1>a lack of identification with colleagues because they knew this

0:22:29.680 --> 0:22:33.679
<v Speaker 1>would increase the them acting on their envy and respondents

0:22:33.680 --> 0:22:36.120
<v Speaker 1>took to surveys they were eight months apart to assess

0:22:36.160 --> 0:22:39.200
<v Speaker 1>their envy, their affinity with colleagues, and their comfort with

0:22:39.320 --> 0:22:43.600
<v Speaker 1>subversive acts and the research. The research basically said that

0:22:43.760 --> 0:22:46.639
<v Speaker 1>envy these people with ties to coworkers were less likely

0:22:46.720 --> 0:22:49.000
<v Speaker 1>to act on their envy, while lone wolves seemed to

0:22:49.160 --> 0:22:52.280
<v Speaker 1>enter into a bubble of moral disengagement that allowed them

0:22:52.280 --> 0:22:56.320
<v Speaker 1>to more freely undermine colleagues by, you know, withholding information

0:22:56.480 --> 0:23:00.119
<v Speaker 1>or spreading gossip for instance. And so the more all

0:23:00.119 --> 0:23:02.440
<v Speaker 1>of this story was, you know, hey, company, she should

0:23:02.560 --> 0:23:05.119
<v Speaker 1>really make sure that all of your employees feel like

0:23:05.200 --> 0:23:06.960
<v Speaker 1>they have a stake in the matter, or they feel

0:23:06.960 --> 0:23:08.840
<v Speaker 1>connected to each other in one man or another, and

0:23:08.840 --> 0:23:11.000
<v Speaker 1>make them feel like they're on the same team. That

0:23:11.080 --> 0:23:13.320
<v Speaker 1>it's that it's a wee and not like that I'm

0:23:13.320 --> 0:23:16.480
<v Speaker 1>not this embattled employee. That it's like, well, they're all

0:23:16.520 --> 0:23:18.359
<v Speaker 1>out to get me anyway, so I might as well

0:23:18.800 --> 0:23:20.760
<v Speaker 1>do whatever that I want. So, yeah, I mean that's

0:23:20.760 --> 0:23:22.840
<v Speaker 1>so that you don't enter into this bubble where it's

0:23:22.880 --> 0:23:26.879
<v Speaker 1>okay to morally distance yourself and maybe just start jamming

0:23:26.920 --> 0:23:29.840
<v Speaker 1>up the copying machine on purpose. I don't know, Oh

0:23:30.040 --> 0:23:31.879
<v Speaker 1>that one I was broken the other day. Well, it

0:23:31.880 --> 0:23:34.240
<v Speaker 1>reminds me. I can't help but think of the film

0:23:34.240 --> 0:23:37.240
<v Speaker 1>The Spanish Prisoner by David Mamma, see this I did,

0:23:37.320 --> 0:23:40.560
<v Speaker 1>yeah long time had like Steve Martin plays the shadowy

0:23:40.680 --> 0:23:43.480
<v Speaker 1>character and and uh, and that's largely all. I don't

0:23:43.480 --> 0:23:45.359
<v Speaker 1>remember what the exact plot was, except I had to

0:23:45.359 --> 0:23:48.440
<v Speaker 1>do with a classic scam called The Spanish Prisoner. There's

0:23:48.480 --> 0:23:51.760
<v Speaker 1>a really nice scene where this, uh, this the protagonist

0:23:51.800 --> 0:23:54.919
<v Speaker 1>in the story is really sudden, like he's working condition

0:23:55.040 --> 0:23:57.239
<v Speaker 1>is suddenly taking a dive and his employers are being

0:23:57.320 --> 0:23:59.880
<v Speaker 1>kind of jerks to him and he's He's like, what's

0:23:59.880 --> 0:24:02.679
<v Speaker 1>this about? And this outher character explains to them, Well,

0:24:02.680 --> 0:24:05.480
<v Speaker 1>it's because they're about to screw you over, so they're

0:24:05.480 --> 0:24:07.840
<v Speaker 1>they're having to create this moral distance from you to

0:24:08.040 --> 0:24:11.080
<v Speaker 1>do it. So so you can see that that potentially

0:24:11.119 --> 0:24:14.720
<v Speaker 1>working both ways and an employee employee or situation. Well,

0:24:14.760 --> 0:24:17.560
<v Speaker 1>we've seen moral distancing in so many different situations. We

0:24:17.640 --> 0:24:20.120
<v Speaker 1>talked about it and lying, where people start to use

0:24:20.240 --> 0:24:22.960
<v Speaker 1>third person references for themselves as opposed to first person.

0:24:23.720 --> 0:24:26.160
<v Speaker 1>We've talked about it in eating animals, how you start

0:24:26.200 --> 0:24:30.080
<v Speaker 1>to talk about meat in very different terms. Um so yeah,

0:24:30.119 --> 0:24:32.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean you can definitely see this at work in

0:24:32.119 --> 0:24:35.719
<v Speaker 1>all different levels of your relationship to your world. Anytime

0:24:35.720 --> 0:24:39.520
<v Speaker 1>you hear someone talking about bureaucracy um, which granted there's

0:24:39.560 --> 0:24:42.040
<v Speaker 1>there are plenty of times in any corporation, any kind

0:24:42.040 --> 0:24:43.639
<v Speaker 1>of working environment where you can say like, oh, that

0:24:43.640 --> 0:24:46.520
<v Speaker 1>seems a little bureaucratic, you know, in the negative sense,

0:24:47.080 --> 0:24:50.159
<v Speaker 1>but it's also like an instant way to to distance

0:24:50.200 --> 0:24:52.760
<v Speaker 1>yourself from the actual people and the you know, you're

0:24:52.800 --> 0:24:55.200
<v Speaker 1>just like, oh, there's a bureaucracy in place, there's the

0:24:55.280 --> 0:24:59.280
<v Speaker 1>soulless entity that is messing with my happiness well, and

0:24:59.359 --> 0:25:01.960
<v Speaker 1>it is the ability to label like that is a

0:25:02.000 --> 0:25:04.760
<v Speaker 1>sense of comfort to right because it's like, oh, this nameless,

0:25:04.760 --> 0:25:07.920
<v Speaker 1>faceless thing, which is you know, impacting my life in

0:25:08.000 --> 0:25:10.359
<v Speaker 1>a nameless, faithless thing. I can totally still off the

0:25:10.400 --> 0:25:13.920
<v Speaker 1>supplies from that. Yeah, post it notes, Yeah, let's have

0:25:14.040 --> 0:25:18.240
<v Speaker 1>my name on it. Journalist Oliver James he has a

0:25:18.280 --> 0:25:21.720
<v Speaker 1>talk on the School of Life about envy specifically, and

0:25:21.760 --> 0:25:24.960
<v Speaker 1>it was really interesting. He talks about envy as being

0:25:25.119 --> 0:25:30.240
<v Speaker 1>affluenza as opposed to influence. The affluenza this preoccupation would

0:25:30.240 --> 0:25:34.400
<v Speaker 1>becoming affluent, and he says it's largely cultural he says

0:25:34.400 --> 0:25:37.040
<v Speaker 1>that if you live in Denmark and had an envy

0:25:37.119 --> 0:25:40.760
<v Speaker 1>inspiring childhood, meaning things happened in your childhood and which

0:25:40.880 --> 0:25:44.120
<v Speaker 1>sort of set you up to to envy others, uh,

0:25:44.160 --> 0:25:46.440
<v Speaker 1>you're less likely to express it than if you live

0:25:46.440 --> 0:25:48.960
<v Speaker 1>in New York or London because at a very simple level,

0:25:49.400 --> 0:25:54.119
<v Speaker 1>much less energy is um expended in mainline continental societies

0:25:54.400 --> 0:25:59.000
<v Speaker 1>and fostering envy. So his point there is there, you know,

0:25:59.000 --> 0:26:01.399
<v Speaker 1>there has got to be culture. Well, there are some countries,

0:26:01.480 --> 0:26:06.359
<v Speaker 1>there are some regions where this pursuit of things and

0:26:06.359 --> 0:26:12.680
<v Speaker 1>in abstractions of happiness via wealth aren't really important. And

0:26:12.760 --> 0:26:15.240
<v Speaker 1>he says that since the nineteen sixties, four times more

0:26:15.280 --> 0:26:17.840
<v Speaker 1>has been spent per capita on advertising and marketing in

0:26:17.840 --> 0:26:21.440
<v Speaker 1>America compared to the continental mainline Europe. And he says

0:26:21.800 --> 0:26:24.679
<v Speaker 1>and throughout the rest of English speaking world, including England,

0:26:24.880 --> 0:26:28.440
<v Speaker 1>twice as much as being spent. So he says, okay,

0:26:28.520 --> 0:26:31.480
<v Speaker 1>let's let's look at the marketing and the advertising, because

0:26:31.480 --> 0:26:35.520
<v Speaker 1>it's very much encouraging you to covet to want things

0:26:35.560 --> 0:26:39.000
<v Speaker 1>that other people have. Huh. It reminds me of the

0:26:39.720 --> 0:26:42.680
<v Speaker 1>in Tibetan Buddhism. The Buddhism in general, there's the idea

0:26:42.680 --> 0:26:44.520
<v Speaker 1>of the predda is the realm of the preda is

0:26:44.560 --> 0:26:47.720
<v Speaker 1>the hungry ghost these which is one of the lower

0:26:47.760 --> 0:26:51.679
<v Speaker 1>realms that one can find themselves born into. And the

0:26:51.720 --> 0:26:56.720
<v Speaker 1>predas have enormous bellies and u and tiny narrow necks

0:26:56.840 --> 0:27:00.600
<v Speaker 1>and the ravenous mouths because they're just so hungry for things,

0:27:01.200 --> 0:27:04.159
<v Speaker 1>for material possessions generally, you know, they're they're so hungry

0:27:04.200 --> 0:27:05.639
<v Speaker 1>for the things in the world around them, and they

0:27:05.640 --> 0:27:08.240
<v Speaker 1>don't have the ability to keep up with that hunger.

0:27:08.320 --> 0:27:10.960
<v Speaker 1>Well see, And it's it's interesting there you have a

0:27:11.000 --> 0:27:14.000
<v Speaker 1>culture and where you're actually talking about this, right. This

0:27:14.080 --> 0:27:15.760
<v Speaker 1>is if you're I don't know if people are sitting

0:27:15.760 --> 0:27:18.840
<v Speaker 1>around the dinner table into that for instance, and talking

0:27:18.880 --> 0:27:22.680
<v Speaker 1>about this. But here is a story about envy and

0:27:22.800 --> 0:27:26.080
<v Speaker 1>um and what happens when you engage in it. And

0:27:26.160 --> 0:27:29.560
<v Speaker 1>this is another thing that James Oliver was talking about.

0:27:29.600 --> 0:27:32.600
<v Speaker 1>There are cultures that are much more traditional that actually

0:27:32.640 --> 0:27:36.000
<v Speaker 1>try to minimize evil. And what he was talking about

0:27:36.200 --> 0:27:39.480
<v Speaker 1>is that they have belief structures in place to kind

0:27:39.480 --> 0:27:42.880
<v Speaker 1>of downplay it. And he was saying that for instance,

0:27:43.119 --> 0:27:45.119
<v Speaker 1>an evil I might be cast upon you if you

0:27:45.160 --> 0:27:48.200
<v Speaker 1>were to start to brag about your success right or

0:27:48.320 --> 0:27:51.960
<v Speaker 1>your successes and um, he's also saying that cultures that

0:27:52.040 --> 0:27:54.360
<v Speaker 1>have less property rights. And this is not just we're

0:27:54.400 --> 0:27:56.520
<v Speaker 1>not just talking about giving smyth the stink guy here,

0:27:56.560 --> 0:27:59.160
<v Speaker 1>whether they just kind kind of like every actually evil

0:27:59.200 --> 0:28:02.280
<v Speaker 1>eye and actual pulling out the evil eye and basically

0:28:02.320 --> 0:28:05.160
<v Speaker 1>saying stand down. Yeah, like we were not really interested

0:28:05.400 --> 0:28:07.399
<v Speaker 1>in you know, man, wouldn't be great to do that.

0:28:07.600 --> 0:28:09.280
<v Speaker 1>Like you go to you go to a party and

0:28:09.320 --> 0:28:13.320
<v Speaker 1>somebody starts off on some some some long discussion about

0:28:13.320 --> 0:28:14.520
<v Speaker 1>how great the are and you can just pull out

0:28:14.560 --> 0:28:16.119
<v Speaker 1>the evil eye and let him have it. Yeah, and

0:28:16.119 --> 0:28:19.840
<v Speaker 1>you say, hey, hey, hey you jack and EPs just

0:28:19.840 --> 0:28:22.840
<v Speaker 1>just enough with that, I got my evil eye out.

0:28:23.320 --> 0:28:25.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, maybe we should Maybe this is something that

0:28:25.119 --> 0:28:28.080
<v Speaker 1>we can introduce in the United States, you know in

0:28:28.160 --> 0:28:31.320
<v Speaker 1>market and and market and other people will covet it.

0:28:31.560 --> 0:28:33.119
<v Speaker 1>Your friend talking a little bit too much about their

0:28:33.160 --> 0:28:35.760
<v Speaker 1>promotion evil. I I think for something here co worker

0:28:35.800 --> 0:28:38.640
<v Speaker 1>loves his nw kando a little too much evil. He

0:28:38.640 --> 0:28:41.240
<v Speaker 1>didn't get it evil eye tattoo. There are all sorts

0:28:41.280 --> 0:28:44.440
<v Speaker 1>of possibilities here. But I mean with his point though,

0:28:44.520 --> 0:28:46.640
<v Speaker 1>is like, here are these cultures that are actually saying

0:28:46.760 --> 0:28:50.800
<v Speaker 1>that this is not acceptable um in our society for

0:28:50.840 --> 0:28:53.000
<v Speaker 1>you to act this way. Well, again we go back

0:28:53.000 --> 0:28:54.840
<v Speaker 1>to Dante and the idea of a whole bunch of

0:28:54.920 --> 0:28:56.920
<v Speaker 1>Endia's individuals sitting on the side of a mountain with

0:28:56.920 --> 0:28:59.960
<v Speaker 1>their eyes soone shut. That sounds like like a pretty

0:29:00.120 --> 0:29:02.880
<v Speaker 1>argument there. Maybe just nobody listens to it anymore within

0:29:03.280 --> 0:29:05.680
<v Speaker 1>those cultures. I don't know. Yeah, that's a little bit

0:29:05.720 --> 0:29:08.960
<v Speaker 1>harder to sort of bring up in a special situation. Well,

0:29:09.000 --> 0:29:11.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, in terms of a metaphorical what do you do?

0:29:11.200 --> 0:29:14.320
<v Speaker 1>Do you like a picture of some of their eyes? Yeah? Yeah, yeah,

0:29:14.320 --> 0:29:15.920
<v Speaker 1>I guess you what you're saying. There's not an instant

0:29:16.640 --> 0:29:18.400
<v Speaker 1>sort of thing. I mean, all you could do. I

0:29:18.400 --> 0:29:20.600
<v Speaker 1>guess that the version of it we have that we

0:29:20.680 --> 0:29:22.600
<v Speaker 1>go to most in Western cultures is simply to roll

0:29:22.640 --> 0:29:24.680
<v Speaker 1>your eyes or sort of walk away from the conversation

0:29:24.840 --> 0:29:28.280
<v Speaker 1>or drastically try and change the subject. Or you could

0:29:28.440 --> 0:29:30.520
<v Speaker 1>put some sort of like make it look like wire

0:29:31.040 --> 0:29:33.440
<v Speaker 1>um thread on the rim of your eye and then

0:29:33.520 --> 0:29:36.760
<v Speaker 1>shut your eyes. Yeah, or you inject a little of

0:29:36.800 --> 0:29:39.080
<v Speaker 1>the schadenfreud if you're bragging about something, you ask a

0:29:39.120 --> 0:29:41.840
<v Speaker 1>Biden question that knocks the blockout from under him a

0:29:41.880 --> 0:29:43.800
<v Speaker 1>little bit, like like someone's got a new car and

0:29:43.800 --> 0:29:45.280
<v Speaker 1>they're like a new car is so great, and you're like,

0:29:45.480 --> 0:29:48.520
<v Speaker 1>so what's the appreciation right on a new vehicle like that?

0:29:48.960 --> 0:29:51.800
<v Speaker 1>What's the insurance like for that vehicle? And then yam,

0:29:52.240 --> 0:29:54.440
<v Speaker 1>But you know, if that's what Oliver James says, he

0:29:54.480 --> 0:29:57.120
<v Speaker 1>actually he talked about instance in his own life where

0:29:57.200 --> 0:29:59.760
<v Speaker 1>there was a colleague that he started to attack on

0:30:00.080 --> 0:30:04.280
<v Speaker 1>national television PS and or I guess on the BBC

0:30:04.680 --> 0:30:07.520
<v Speaker 1>and uh no no, but he started. He said it

0:30:07.560 --> 0:30:09.840
<v Speaker 1>was a complete rant and it didn't make any sense

0:30:09.840 --> 0:30:12.320
<v Speaker 1>to him until later he realized that he envied that

0:30:12.400 --> 0:30:14.720
<v Speaker 1>colleague and was trying to take him down a notch.

0:30:16.000 --> 0:30:18.120
<v Speaker 1>So you see that his he must have been getting

0:30:18.160 --> 0:30:20.000
<v Speaker 1>some sort of kick there, some sort of reward in

0:30:20.080 --> 0:30:22.840
<v Speaker 1>his brain. Um. But you know, this is what he says.

0:30:22.880 --> 0:30:26.240
<v Speaker 1>He says that that this sort of envy that's wanting

0:30:26.320 --> 0:30:30.200
<v Speaker 1>this void, this filling the void, is driving a lot

0:30:30.240 --> 0:30:32.720
<v Speaker 1>of mental illness. And he says that if we could

0:30:32.760 --> 0:30:35.840
<v Speaker 1>just turn more inward and try to figure out the

0:30:35.840 --> 0:30:37.960
<v Speaker 1>things that that make us happy, Like he was saying,

0:30:38.000 --> 0:30:40.720
<v Speaker 1>if you can, if you can identify the state of

0:30:40.800 --> 0:30:43.920
<v Speaker 1>flow that sometimes we engage in that state of flow

0:30:43.960 --> 0:30:46.680
<v Speaker 1>in which time just evaporates, right, because you were so

0:30:46.760 --> 0:30:49.120
<v Speaker 1>engaged in something and it's so pleasurable and you're living

0:30:49.160 --> 0:30:51.960
<v Speaker 1>in the moment. You're not living in a path that

0:30:52.040 --> 0:30:55.640
<v Speaker 1>you're concerned about or the future that you're worried over. Yeah,

0:30:56.080 --> 0:30:57.880
<v Speaker 1>he's saying, if we could just engage in that and

0:30:57.960 --> 0:31:01.320
<v Speaker 1>quit focusing on the exterior and what we think we're lacking,

0:31:01.880 --> 0:31:04.160
<v Speaker 1>then a lot of this sort of mental illness of

0:31:04.200 --> 0:31:08.200
<v Speaker 1>society would would not be as bad as it is. Um,

0:31:08.240 --> 0:31:11.320
<v Speaker 1>if we could quit listening basically to marketers and advertisers

0:31:11.320 --> 0:31:14.960
<v Speaker 1>and I didn't really care about the halftime Super Bowl ads,

0:31:15.160 --> 0:31:17.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, for instance, that this is sort of a

0:31:17.360 --> 0:31:20.040
<v Speaker 1>path that would would get us away from that, and

0:31:20.040 --> 0:31:22.320
<v Speaker 1>then we can depart the realm of hungry guys. I

0:31:22.440 --> 0:31:25.160
<v Speaker 1>like it. All right, Well, let's um, let's call the

0:31:25.240 --> 0:31:29.720
<v Speaker 1>robot over and uh see if he has an interesting listener. Mayo,

0:31:29.760 --> 0:31:33.520
<v Speaker 1>maybe to cap all this off, all right, we have

0:31:33.520 --> 0:31:35.920
<v Speaker 1>a couple here, both a rat related which I like.

0:31:36.520 --> 0:31:39.479
<v Speaker 1>The first one is a respond to our recent and

0:31:39.760 --> 0:31:42.280
<v Speaker 1>dare I say, awesome rat King episode. Devin writes in

0:31:42.400 --> 0:31:45.520
<v Speaker 1>and says hello from Canada, thank you for all the

0:31:45.520 --> 0:31:49.360
<v Speaker 1>amazing podcasts. Uh, with the exception of your rat king episode.

0:31:49.800 --> 0:31:51.960
<v Speaker 1>I listened to all your podcasts while it would work

0:31:52.360 --> 0:31:55.640
<v Speaker 1>as a postman here in Edmonton, Alberta. Alberta is thankfully

0:31:55.680 --> 0:31:59.600
<v Speaker 1>a quote rat free, unquote province. This knowledge was a

0:31:59.680 --> 0:32:02.120
<v Speaker 1>secure any blanket that I clung to while listening to

0:32:02.240 --> 0:32:05.400
<v Speaker 1>you your podcast has me gagging and quivering up while

0:32:05.520 --> 0:32:08.600
<v Speaker 1>delivering mails. His childhood, I have had a phobia of rats.

0:32:08.800 --> 0:32:10.680
<v Speaker 1>I am able to control this fear down to a

0:32:10.720 --> 0:32:13.840
<v Speaker 1>mildest comfort in most cases. The rat king, however, is

0:32:13.840 --> 0:32:16.520
<v Speaker 1>one of the most disgusting things I could possibly imagine. Uh.

0:32:16.520 --> 0:32:20.120
<v Speaker 1>And then it all descends into as gibberish from there.

0:32:20.520 --> 0:32:25.120
<v Speaker 1>So that was a delightful Yeah. I'm sorry to cause

0:32:25.160 --> 0:32:28.880
<v Speaker 1>such consternation, but that was a really funny email. Yeah.

0:32:29.240 --> 0:32:32.440
<v Speaker 1>And then we also heard from Sue B who writes

0:32:32.480 --> 0:32:34.880
<v Speaker 1>in about the same gender sex pairings and animals the

0:32:35.160 --> 0:32:38.680
<v Speaker 1>gay animals episode we did, and Subi says I had

0:32:38.680 --> 0:32:42.160
<v Speaker 1>two pet rats that their sisters named Natalie and Eka.

0:32:42.720 --> 0:32:44.720
<v Speaker 1>It has an explanation point at the end as to

0:32:44.840 --> 0:32:46.280
<v Speaker 1>say that that's the kind of name that you would

0:32:46.360 --> 0:32:49.840
<v Speaker 1>need an explanation point with. Eka was large and more aggressive,

0:32:50.040 --> 0:32:53.440
<v Speaker 1>but not as adventurous as Natalie as to exploring their surroundings.

0:32:53.720 --> 0:32:57.200
<v Speaker 1>Natalie would get into anything not sealed off. Eca was

0:32:57.360 --> 0:32:59.920
<v Speaker 1>very interested in pinning latally down and licking her genet

0:33:00.000 --> 0:33:02.720
<v Speaker 1>o you or mounting her as a male would. Natalie

0:33:02.720 --> 0:33:06.080
<v Speaker 1>had no interest in this. At times, ECA's ardor was

0:33:06.200 --> 0:33:08.640
<v Speaker 1>very aggressive and nat would have to fight her off.

0:33:08.880 --> 0:33:12.680
<v Speaker 1>Eka would be would be relentless to the point that

0:33:12.760 --> 0:33:15.480
<v Speaker 1>it distressed me. I wanted to tell her to stop

0:33:15.560 --> 0:33:19.240
<v Speaker 1>raping her sister. So many character aspects here in incest,

0:33:19.440 --> 0:33:22.880
<v Speaker 1>same gender, sexual attraction, a possibility of a sexuality, and

0:33:22.960 --> 0:33:25.960
<v Speaker 1>just playing domination. I guess that's my two cents best

0:33:26.000 --> 0:33:30.080
<v Speaker 1>regards to be Wow, that was the oddest configuration of

0:33:30.160 --> 0:33:32.920
<v Speaker 1>words ever tumbling out of your mouth with with such

0:33:34.000 --> 0:33:36.480
<v Speaker 1>intonations as well. I don't even know what to say

0:33:36.520 --> 0:33:39.080
<v Speaker 1>with about that. So that's fascinating. We we asked for

0:33:39.120 --> 0:33:45.000
<v Speaker 1>examples of same sex animal adventures and uh, that was

0:33:45.040 --> 0:33:49.440
<v Speaker 1>an interesting account, So it wasn't expecting yet the level

0:33:49.400 --> 0:33:52.560
<v Speaker 1>of detail. Yeah, so hey, if the rest of you

0:33:52.600 --> 0:33:54.640
<v Speaker 1>guys would like to pipe in, if you have something

0:33:54.720 --> 0:33:57.160
<v Speaker 1>you would like to add about rat kings, about same

0:33:57.160 --> 0:34:01.719
<v Speaker 1>sex relationships between rat Kings, or just good old green indeed,

0:34:02.080 --> 0:34:03.880
<v Speaker 1>let us know. We'd love to hear about it. I

0:34:03.880 --> 0:34:06.640
<v Speaker 1>mean specifically, you know, how do you process envy in

0:34:06.640 --> 0:34:08.320
<v Speaker 1>your life? I mean, to to what extent do you

0:34:08.360 --> 0:34:09.839
<v Speaker 1>feel like you're aware of it? Do you ever catch

0:34:09.880 --> 0:34:13.840
<v Speaker 1>yourself becoming envious? And uh? And then how do you

0:34:13.920 --> 0:34:16.480
<v Speaker 1>process Did you ever know how much it wore your

0:34:16.480 --> 0:34:18.560
<v Speaker 1>brain down? Yeah? Yeah? Do you feel like a little

0:34:18.560 --> 0:34:20.560
<v Speaker 1>worn out after a long bout of envy? If so,

0:34:20.680 --> 0:34:23.280
<v Speaker 1>let us know. Um. You can find us on Facebook

0:34:23.440 --> 0:34:26.000
<v Speaker 1>as stuff to Blow the Mind, and you can find

0:34:26.040 --> 0:34:28.560
<v Speaker 1>us on Twitter as Blow the Mind, and you can

0:34:28.560 --> 0:34:31.120
<v Speaker 1>send us an email at Blow the Mind at Discovery

0:34:31.160 --> 0:34:38.520
<v Speaker 1>dot com. Be sure to check out our new video podcast,

0:34:38.760 --> 0:34:41.600
<v Speaker 1>Stuff from the Future. Join how Stuff Work staff as

0:34:41.680 --> 0:34:45.360
<v Speaker 1>we explore the most promising and perplexing possibilities of tomorrow.