WEBVTT - Virtual Reaity Robots Will Be Operating On You: Vicarious CEO

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day, we bring

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.520 --> 0:00:15.600
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets Podcast

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:18.439
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:22.520
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. Right now, I want

0:00:22.520 --> 0:00:27.640
<v Speaker 1>to go to uh Charlestown, Massachusetts and talk to Adam Sacks.

0:00:27.640 --> 0:00:31.640
<v Speaker 1>He's the CEO and co founder of Vicarious, which is

0:00:31.680 --> 0:00:36.800
<v Speaker 1>a robotic surgery startup backed by Bill Gates and looking

0:00:36.800 --> 0:00:39.960
<v Speaker 1>at us spack um, Adam, I gotta say, as a

0:00:40.040 --> 0:00:42.879
<v Speaker 1>lifelong motorcyclist, I'm a big fan of surgery. Is this

0:00:43.040 --> 0:00:45.640
<v Speaker 1>the kind of thing that I would need after, you know,

0:00:45.760 --> 0:00:50.360
<v Speaker 1>running into a pickup truck? Hey, guys, thanks so much

0:00:50.360 --> 0:00:53.840
<v Speaker 1>for having me out. Um so, uh well, let's hope

0:00:53.880 --> 0:00:56.960
<v Speaker 1>that never happened. But we're you know, we're targeting pretty

0:00:56.960 --> 0:01:02.880
<v Speaker 1>broad applications across abdominal surgery. Uh so you know, yeah, absolutely,

0:01:02.960 --> 0:01:06.319
<v Speaker 1>I think there are multiple procedures that are emergent procedures.

0:01:08.120 --> 0:01:11.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm imagining a robot like from short circuit standing over

0:01:11.120 --> 0:01:13.840
<v Speaker 1>an operating table, and I'm sure that's not what it's like,

0:01:14.200 --> 0:01:15.679
<v Speaker 1>what do you what do you do? And you also

0:01:15.720 --> 0:01:18.360
<v Speaker 1>make it possible for doctors to use kind of a

0:01:18.440 --> 0:01:23.679
<v Speaker 1>virtual reality look at the inner abdominal space. Yeah, exactly.

0:01:23.760 --> 0:01:26.600
<v Speaker 1>So you know what we essentially do it vicarious surgical

0:01:26.720 --> 0:01:31.680
<v Speaker 1>is we're creating a tiny little robot that goes inside

0:01:31.680 --> 0:01:36.160
<v Speaker 1>of your abdominal cavity and allows the surgeon to connect

0:01:36.319 --> 0:01:39.680
<v Speaker 1>to the robot using hand controllers in a VR headset

0:01:39.760 --> 0:01:42.680
<v Speaker 1>that they wear. It essentially becomes, you know, their avatar

0:01:42.720 --> 0:01:47.160
<v Speaker 1>inside the body. They're they're they're beamed inside of their patients. Uh,

0:01:47.200 --> 0:01:50.520
<v Speaker 1>and it allows for a you know, a much much better,

0:01:50.720 --> 0:01:54.120
<v Speaker 1>much more immersive approach for the surgeon, gives them a

0:01:54.160 --> 0:01:57.080
<v Speaker 1>lot better spatial awareness, a lot better ability to operate

0:01:57.120 --> 0:02:00.640
<v Speaker 1>once they're inside. This is as compared to you know,

0:02:00.680 --> 0:02:03.520
<v Speaker 1>the two main alternatives that exist today, which you're either

0:02:04.600 --> 0:02:08.800
<v Speaker 1>either open surgery sort of the classic way of performing surgery,

0:02:08.880 --> 0:02:12.200
<v Speaker 1>where a surgeon will make one large incision and open

0:02:12.240 --> 0:02:16.120
<v Speaker 1>the patient up that that incision is associated with complication

0:02:16.240 --> 0:02:18.919
<v Speaker 1>rates that by the way, it's still the dominant way

0:02:18.919 --> 0:02:23.200
<v Speaker 1>of operating today, or robotic well and Adam, that's the

0:02:23.200 --> 0:02:26.280
<v Speaker 1>way patients are used to getting surgery right, having a

0:02:26.320 --> 0:02:29.680
<v Speaker 1>doctor physically be there in the room performing the surgery themselves.

0:02:29.720 --> 0:02:31.680
<v Speaker 1>What do you think do you think there's a barrier

0:02:31.760 --> 0:02:35.440
<v Speaker 1>in people being willing to have a robot do this

0:02:35.520 --> 0:02:39.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of thing instead. Well, I say this is you know,

0:02:40.000 --> 0:02:43.200
<v Speaker 1>one of the handful of areas where sometimes it actually

0:02:43.240 --> 0:02:46.880
<v Speaker 1>is best to be the second entrant to the market. Uh. There,

0:02:46.880 --> 0:02:49.760
<v Speaker 1>you know that there's an incumbent here in robotic surgery

0:02:49.880 --> 0:02:54.480
<v Speaker 1>that has developed a system. They perform about three percent

0:02:54.639 --> 0:02:58.600
<v Speaker 1>of the applicable procedures, which gives us a tremendous amount

0:02:58.639 --> 0:03:02.239
<v Speaker 1>of white space while still being about a million procedures

0:03:02.240 --> 0:03:05.120
<v Speaker 1>per year. I mean, surgery is an incredibly large market.

0:03:05.160 --> 0:03:07.480
<v Speaker 1>They're performed all over, all over the country and all

0:03:07.520 --> 0:03:11.480
<v Speaker 1>over the world. So there's already been you know, uh

0:03:11.600 --> 0:03:15.919
<v Speaker 1>comfort over the last twenty years grown in in robotic surgery,

0:03:16.440 --> 0:03:19.240
<v Speaker 1>while at the same time, the incumbents have not addressed

0:03:19.480 --> 0:03:23.480
<v Speaker 1>h the real needs of surgains and patients. So you're

0:03:23.480 --> 0:03:26.520
<v Speaker 1>going to combine with the spack the transaction combines the company,

0:03:26.880 --> 0:03:29.760
<v Speaker 1>the transaction values of the company. I should say at

0:03:29.919 --> 0:03:34.000
<v Speaker 1>a one point one billion dollars. It's um going to

0:03:34.120 --> 0:03:36.480
<v Speaker 1>provide you with about four or twenty five million in cash.

0:03:36.520 --> 0:03:38.040
<v Speaker 1>What are you gonna do with the with the money?

0:03:38.160 --> 0:03:43.080
<v Speaker 1>Is this all going to R and D and then deployment? Yeah,

0:03:43.080 --> 0:03:45.880
<v Speaker 1>So the point where we're at now is uh, you know,

0:03:46.000 --> 0:03:49.240
<v Speaker 1>much more development than research, kind of finishing up the

0:03:49.280 --> 0:03:52.800
<v Speaker 1>final development all we've we've been at this full time

0:03:52.840 --> 0:03:57.040
<v Speaker 1>for seven years, and we've reinvented the way surgical robotics

0:03:57.040 --> 0:03:59.800
<v Speaker 1>work actually from you know, from truly the ground up,

0:04:00.120 --> 0:04:04.360
<v Speaker 1>the actuator level of so uh, less than half of

0:04:04.400 --> 0:04:07.640
<v Speaker 1>the money total that the proceeds in this transaction will

0:04:07.680 --> 0:04:11.520
<v Speaker 1>be used for development, really refining the features and then

0:04:11.520 --> 0:04:14.600
<v Speaker 1>getting through the regulatory halfway so that we can get

0:04:14.640 --> 0:04:20.000
<v Speaker 1>our systems to hospitals, the surgeons into patients. UM. Half

0:04:20.000 --> 0:04:22.080
<v Speaker 1>of the money, more than half of the money actually

0:04:22.080 --> 0:04:25.120
<v Speaker 1>will be used to drive the commercial effort and the

0:04:25.120 --> 0:04:28.279
<v Speaker 1>growth and revenue that you've seen our in our projection.

0:04:28.880 --> 0:04:30.600
<v Speaker 1>Do you work do you work with Bill Gates on this?

0:04:30.680 --> 0:04:34.880
<v Speaker 1>What's it like working with Bill Gates? I? Uh, you know,

0:04:34.920 --> 0:04:37.640
<v Speaker 1>we we've had the pleasure of meeting him a handful

0:04:37.680 --> 0:04:40.080
<v Speaker 1>of times and actually pitching this to him in person.

0:04:40.200 --> 0:04:43.320
<v Speaker 1>But you know, I wouldn't say we worked you know,

0:04:43.480 --> 0:04:45.640
<v Speaker 1>cater tate with him at all. We we give him

0:04:45.720 --> 0:04:49.119
<v Speaker 1>updates on what we're doing. Adam quickly, I just quickly

0:04:49.120 --> 0:04:50.760
<v Speaker 1>want to ask, we only have about a minute left,

0:04:50.760 --> 0:04:53.679
<v Speaker 1>but why a speck Did you look at taking another

0:04:53.800 --> 0:04:56.000
<v Speaker 1>route to the public markets? Did you look at doing

0:04:56.040 --> 0:04:59.960
<v Speaker 1>an I p O. Yeah, the answer is of course.

0:05:00.560 --> 0:05:04.560
<v Speaker 1>But you know, I think facts give unique advantage in

0:05:04.760 --> 0:05:07.200
<v Speaker 1>that they have, you know, the cash and trust combined

0:05:07.240 --> 0:05:10.160
<v Speaker 1>with the SPAC sponsor who brings you know, UH, their

0:05:10.240 --> 0:05:13.640
<v Speaker 1>own set of expertise and experiences, especially in our case

0:05:13.720 --> 0:05:16.599
<v Speaker 1>having you know that the former CEO of the Shaw

0:05:16.720 --> 0:05:20.240
<v Speaker 1>Asia being the stack promote and all the public market

0:05:20.279 --> 0:05:23.280
<v Speaker 1>experience that comes with that, and their ability to do

0:05:23.360 --> 0:05:26.400
<v Speaker 1>deep diligence, send surgeons out to try our system to

0:05:26.480 --> 0:05:29.680
<v Speaker 1>do cadaver lab and then to stand behind all of

0:05:29.720 --> 0:05:33.599
<v Speaker 1>their diligence with both their capital and their experience. So

0:05:33.720 --> 0:05:36.440
<v Speaker 1>it's it's uh. I think that there's a real place

0:05:36.520 --> 0:05:40.480
<v Speaker 1>for spacts UH in the world, and we're incredibly excited

0:05:40.520 --> 0:05:42.920
<v Speaker 1>to be partnering with d A. And there's a big

0:05:42.920 --> 0:05:45.359
<v Speaker 1>pipe component we should point out. Usually a vote of

0:05:45.400 --> 0:05:47.960
<v Speaker 1>confidence there from the pros. Adam, thanks so much for

0:05:48.000 --> 0:05:50.920
<v Speaker 1>joining us. Adam Sacks, CEO and co founder of Vicarious

0:05:51.040 --> 0:05:56.680
<v Speaker 1>Taker will be r B O T. Don't want to

0:05:56.680 --> 0:06:00.520
<v Speaker 1>bring in strip classis. He is the principal director of

0:06:00.560 --> 0:06:05.080
<v Speaker 1>research at the John Burns real estate consulting firm out

0:06:05.080 --> 0:06:10.400
<v Speaker 1>in Irvine, California. And um, Rick, I am desperately seeking

0:06:10.520 --> 0:06:14.760
<v Speaker 1>a home in Westchester, New York. Uh as soon as

0:06:14.800 --> 0:06:17.760
<v Speaker 1>I can convince my wife we're moving back state side.

0:06:17.920 --> 0:06:20.719
<v Speaker 1>And um, I've noticed that the prices are a lot

0:06:20.800 --> 0:06:23.360
<v Speaker 1>higher than they were when I left five years ago.

0:06:23.640 --> 0:06:27.800
<v Speaker 1>Are we in a housing bubble? Yeah? So good luck

0:06:27.920 --> 0:06:32.839
<v Speaker 1>with that search, good luck to really anybody across the country. UM.

0:06:32.880 --> 0:06:34.400
<v Speaker 1>You know, we put out a paper on this a

0:06:34.440 --> 0:06:37.120
<v Speaker 1>couple of weeks ago called Investormania two point oh. And

0:06:37.240 --> 0:06:38.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think it's important take a step back

0:06:38.880 --> 0:06:41.720
<v Speaker 1>and just really just hit on the head. I mean,

0:06:41.760 --> 0:06:45.159
<v Speaker 1>housing fundamentals are the strongest in decades, and we expect

0:06:45.240 --> 0:06:47.360
<v Speaker 1>to boom over the next few years. But our view

0:06:47.440 --> 0:06:51.159
<v Speaker 1>is that we are in the early stages of a bubble,

0:06:51.680 --> 0:06:55.080
<v Speaker 1>no imminent risk of a collapse, and honestly, the next

0:06:55.120 --> 0:06:56.720
<v Speaker 1>two years are probably gonna be the best years for

0:06:56.760 --> 0:07:00.839
<v Speaker 1>housing in in a decade. So the word bubble is

0:07:01.800 --> 0:07:05.479
<v Speaker 1>a loosely defined term. How do you define bubble and

0:07:05.520 --> 0:07:08.560
<v Speaker 1>what factors are you considering in leading you to this

0:07:08.600 --> 0:07:12.920
<v Speaker 1>conclusion that we could be building towards one? Yeah, I

0:07:12.640 --> 0:07:15.200
<v Speaker 1>I think the one the one element that we don't

0:07:15.280 --> 0:07:17.400
<v Speaker 1>have that is usually check off the box where the

0:07:17.440 --> 0:07:21.120
<v Speaker 1>bubble is crazy wacky mortgage lending. So we don't have

0:07:21.160 --> 0:07:23.280
<v Speaker 1>a knock on both thank goodness. We don't have the

0:07:23.360 --> 0:07:26.640
<v Speaker 1>ninja loans, no income, no job, no assets, um. And

0:07:26.680 --> 0:07:29.600
<v Speaker 1>that's that's the reason why in the paper Investor Media

0:07:29.720 --> 0:07:34.240
<v Speaker 1>two point oh one point oh was really the retail

0:07:34.280 --> 0:07:39.040
<v Speaker 1>buyer investor getting five plus mortgages, no equity, no documentation.

0:07:39.920 --> 0:07:42.320
<v Speaker 1>That is not happening as far as we're we're seeing.

0:07:42.400 --> 0:07:44.520
<v Speaker 1>It's much more. And this is the two point oh

0:07:44.760 --> 0:07:49.080
<v Speaker 1>much more of an institutionally backed umbrella of investor groups.

0:07:49.160 --> 0:07:51.960
<v Speaker 1>And so in the paper we identified two hundred plus

0:07:52.400 --> 0:07:54.760
<v Speaker 1>and it's pretty eye opening because most of these groups,

0:07:54.800 --> 0:07:58.600
<v Speaker 1>actually the lion's share, did not exist in the last upturn.

0:07:58.680 --> 0:08:01.480
<v Speaker 1>So I can walk you through the categories. It's flippers,

0:08:02.040 --> 0:08:04.400
<v Speaker 1>it's I buyers. I think like the open door off

0:08:04.400 --> 0:08:07.600
<v Speaker 1>the paths of the world, single family rental landlords which

0:08:07.600 --> 0:08:12.640
<v Speaker 1>are now institutionally backed um backed by capital really across

0:08:12.720 --> 0:08:16.920
<v Speaker 1>the world, pension insurance company's sovereign wealth funds, vacation second

0:08:16.920 --> 0:08:20.040
<v Speaker 1>home buyers, foreign investors. And then the last one I

0:08:20.080 --> 0:08:23.400
<v Speaker 1>think is when you when you ask that question, bubble um.

0:08:23.400 --> 0:08:26.760
<v Speaker 1>This last category, so the theme of democratization of rental

0:08:26.880 --> 0:08:32.120
<v Speaker 1>investing and all of these alternative fractional ownership crowdfunding groups

0:08:32.679 --> 0:08:35.360
<v Speaker 1>that are advertising themselves kind of like the Robin hoods

0:08:35.360 --> 0:08:38.480
<v Speaker 1>of real estate. That's the thing that worries me, I

0:08:38.480 --> 0:08:42.640
<v Speaker 1>would say the most, Well, dude, for me, this is

0:08:42.679 --> 0:08:45.520
<v Speaker 1>the worst of both worlds, because you're telling me the

0:08:45.520 --> 0:08:47.600
<v Speaker 1>bank is gonna be the bank is going to really

0:08:47.640 --> 0:08:52.880
<v Speaker 1>scrutinize my financials without giving me a mortgage. But prices

0:08:52.920 --> 0:08:55.920
<v Speaker 1>are going up like bubble style, so you know, the

0:08:56.800 --> 0:08:59.560
<v Speaker 1>million dollar house I want is going to cost too

0:08:59.640 --> 0:09:03.719
<v Speaker 1>sick and I'm never going to get a mortgage. Um.

0:09:03.800 --> 0:09:06.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, do I get with one of these? Uh?

0:09:06.720 --> 0:09:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Do I have to end up renting from one of

0:09:08.720 --> 0:09:11.040
<v Speaker 1>these groups? There are big institutions that are going out

0:09:11.040 --> 0:09:13.480
<v Speaker 1>and buying loads of houses and then renting them out

0:09:13.520 --> 0:09:16.839
<v Speaker 1>to people. So I have not yet seen a group

0:09:16.920 --> 0:09:20.080
<v Speaker 1>renting out two million dollar plus homes at scale. So

0:09:20.160 --> 0:09:21.560
<v Speaker 1>you tell me if you find that, I would love

0:09:21.600 --> 0:09:24.599
<v Speaker 1>to hear that. Um. But but I mean, honestly, I

0:09:24.600 --> 0:09:27.000
<v Speaker 1>mean we you know, we saw the monster housing housing

0:09:27.040 --> 0:09:32.000
<v Speaker 1>numbers this morning, and a big percentage of those homes

0:09:32.000 --> 0:09:34.480
<v Speaker 1>and I'm talking single family, they're going to go right

0:09:34.520 --> 0:09:37.120
<v Speaker 1>into the rental pool. And I mean this is just

0:09:37.200 --> 0:09:39.080
<v Speaker 1>if you, if you follow with the big public builders

0:09:39.080 --> 0:09:41.920
<v Speaker 1>are saying publicly, I mean they're selling right into those groups.

0:09:42.280 --> 0:09:45.120
<v Speaker 1>The big public single family rental operators are buying ten

0:09:45.160 --> 0:09:50.120
<v Speaker 1>to of their homes straight from home builders. Um. So yeah,

0:09:50.160 --> 0:09:53.920
<v Speaker 1>I do think that the rental market is going to

0:09:54.000 --> 0:09:55.920
<v Speaker 1>capture a lot of this. Well, Rick, I'm glad you

0:09:55.960 --> 0:09:58.439
<v Speaker 1>brought that up. Obviously, the data you're referring to is

0:09:58.480 --> 0:10:01.480
<v Speaker 1>housing starts jumped to night teen point four percent, to

0:10:01.559 --> 0:10:04.200
<v Speaker 1>the highest since two thousand six. That's what the data

0:10:04.240 --> 0:10:07.080
<v Speaker 1>revealed this morning. I'm wondering how long you think that

0:10:07.200 --> 0:10:10.679
<v Speaker 1>strong construction activity can really continue, though, especially as we

0:10:10.720 --> 0:10:14.240
<v Speaker 1>look at pricing pressures and material costs, supply chain issues,

0:10:14.280 --> 0:10:19.000
<v Speaker 1>all these inflationary conversations are having Yeah, yeah, no. Homebuilders

0:10:19.000 --> 0:10:21.880
<v Speaker 1>are trying their darndest to add some supply to the market,

0:10:22.160 --> 0:10:24.240
<v Speaker 1>and it just it takes a long time. I mean,

0:10:24.400 --> 0:10:26.040
<v Speaker 1>you don't buy land and slow homes on it the

0:10:26.080 --> 0:10:29.920
<v Speaker 1>next day. But I can tell you we're extremely bullish

0:10:30.160 --> 0:10:32.480
<v Speaker 1>the next couple of years. And we've got housing starts

0:10:32.520 --> 0:10:34.720
<v Speaker 1>and now I'm stack in single family bulle family here.

0:10:34.960 --> 0:10:37.160
<v Speaker 1>We've got housing starts going up to roughly two million

0:10:38.320 --> 0:10:40.120
<v Speaker 1>four so we we do expect that we're going to

0:10:40.200 --> 0:10:45.200
<v Speaker 1>get back to the oh five six type of construction levels.

0:10:45.400 --> 0:10:47.080
<v Speaker 1>And I think it also comes back to my earlier

0:10:47.080 --> 0:10:51.200
<v Speaker 1>comments on how yes, investors are accelerating this recovery, but

0:10:51.320 --> 0:10:54.880
<v Speaker 1>the backdrop from just the fundamental standpoint is really the

0:10:54.920 --> 0:10:57.880
<v Speaker 1>strongest we've seen in many, many, many years. So there's

0:10:57.920 --> 0:11:00.480
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of runway here, Rick, where you seeing,

0:11:00.800 --> 0:11:06.440
<v Speaker 1>um the biggest price inflation. So if you're asking on

0:11:06.559 --> 0:11:08.800
<v Speaker 1>markets across the country in terms of home prices, I

0:11:08.840 --> 0:11:12.640
<v Speaker 1>would say so nationally, our index and this is March

0:11:12.760 --> 0:11:17.280
<v Speaker 1>data is up about fire and this is the resale market.

0:11:17.440 --> 0:11:19.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if you look at a market like Boise,

0:11:19.160 --> 0:11:21.240
<v Speaker 1>which is all the buzz right now, home presses are

0:11:21.280 --> 0:11:23.680
<v Speaker 1>up three percent year of rear. And that's so if

0:11:23.720 --> 0:11:26.439
<v Speaker 1>you've lived and breathed in in Boise your whole life,

0:11:26.800 --> 0:11:28.880
<v Speaker 1>you look around, you're like, this does not make any sense.

0:11:29.240 --> 0:11:31.480
<v Speaker 1>But if you're coming out of California or maybe Matt

0:11:31.520 --> 0:11:35.520
<v Speaker 1>you and New York, Boise it's pretty affordable compared to Westchester.

0:11:37.360 --> 0:11:39.959
<v Speaker 1>Maybe my boss will let me relocate to Boise. That

0:11:40.000 --> 0:11:43.160
<v Speaker 1>would actually rule. I would love. I mean, I've never

0:11:43.200 --> 0:11:46.280
<v Speaker 1>been to Boise, but I assume it's amazing having watched

0:11:46.280 --> 0:11:48.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot of Westerns. I think it features heavily in

0:11:49.040 --> 0:11:53.040
<v Speaker 1>Legends of the Fall, the Brad Pitt Anthony Hopkins film. UM.

0:11:53.120 --> 0:11:55.640
<v Speaker 1>John thanks so much for joining us. Rick Pelacios there,

0:11:55.720 --> 0:12:00.400
<v Speaker 1>director of research at John Burns Real Estate. Uh uh

0:12:00.840 --> 0:12:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Rick Pelasio's John Burns Real Estate UM Consulting. Really fascinating story.

0:12:06.200 --> 0:12:09.040
<v Speaker 1>If depressing for someone in the housing market, it's great

0:12:09.080 --> 0:12:13.959
<v Speaker 1>for those of you looking to sell a house. We

0:12:14.120 --> 0:12:16.600
<v Speaker 1>just get over now to Lauren Sour she's an associate

0:12:16.600 --> 0:12:21.160
<v Speaker 1>professor of Emergency Medicine at the Johns Hopkins School of Medicine.

0:12:21.679 --> 0:12:26.840
<v Speaker 1>To talk about UM, the vaccine drive and what's working

0:12:26.920 --> 0:12:29.360
<v Speaker 1>what's not, Lauren, I want to start off with a

0:12:29.440 --> 0:12:32.560
<v Speaker 1>question my producer samaraw Lnga has often asked, but we

0:12:32.600 --> 0:12:36.160
<v Speaker 1>don't really know. UM, I don't really know the answer,

0:12:36.200 --> 0:12:39.600
<v Speaker 1>and we haven't really gotten a solid one. After you

0:12:39.640 --> 0:12:45.079
<v Speaker 1>get vaccinated? Can you still transmit the disease? Can vaccinated

0:12:45.160 --> 0:12:49.480
<v Speaker 1>people still pass it on? It's a great question. I mean,

0:12:49.640 --> 0:12:52.199
<v Speaker 1>I think the reason you haven't gotten satisfying answer is

0:12:52.280 --> 0:12:54.679
<v Speaker 1>because the work is still being done to understand that.

0:12:54.800 --> 0:12:58.440
<v Speaker 1>I know both Fightser and Maderna have studies ongoing where

0:12:58.440 --> 0:13:01.080
<v Speaker 1>they're looking at transmission, and so we do know that

0:13:01.120 --> 0:13:04.439
<v Speaker 1>it protects you against severe disease, protects you against hospitalization.

0:13:04.960 --> 0:13:07.960
<v Speaker 1>And the question you have to, you know, dig into

0:13:07.960 --> 0:13:11.720
<v Speaker 1>a little deeper, using specimens from the UM studies and

0:13:11.800 --> 0:13:15.920
<v Speaker 1>ongoing following of participants and their familial cohorts, is to

0:13:16.040 --> 0:13:18.920
<v Speaker 1>look at this. And that's the work that's happening right now.

0:13:19.040 --> 0:13:22.520
<v Speaker 1>We think the preliminary data shows that it is transmission blocking,

0:13:22.559 --> 0:13:25.000
<v Speaker 1>at least from I believe it's the Fiser and Maderna

0:13:25.440 --> 0:13:28.400
<v Speaker 1>vaccines that we have preliminary data from UM. But it's

0:13:28.440 --> 0:13:30.959
<v Speaker 1>sort of a wait and see situation where we hope

0:13:30.960 --> 0:13:33.200
<v Speaker 1>to continue to see good data that shows us that

0:13:33.280 --> 0:13:35.760
<v Speaker 1>it is, well, wait for how long, Lauren? I was

0:13:35.800 --> 0:13:38.520
<v Speaker 1>looking at the CDC guidelines about you know what fully

0:13:38.600 --> 0:13:42.120
<v Speaker 1>vaccinated people can and cannot do, and it says until

0:13:42.240 --> 0:13:45.959
<v Speaker 1>more is known to keep socially distancing, etcetera, etcetera. Until

0:13:46.080 --> 0:13:49.240
<v Speaker 1>more is known. Really is the operative line there? How

0:13:49.320 --> 0:13:53.600
<v Speaker 1>long until more is known? Yeah? I think so. We

0:13:53.600 --> 0:13:56.520
<v Speaker 1>already have the preliminary study. I believe it was out

0:13:56.559 --> 0:13:59.920
<v Speaker 1>of Israel that shows that the Fiser vaccine might block

0:14:00.040 --> 0:14:03.160
<v Speaker 1>transmission UM, which is promising for the rest of the

0:14:03.679 --> 0:14:06.600
<v Speaker 1>release for both of the m R and A vaccines UM.

0:14:06.679 --> 0:14:09.320
<v Speaker 1>So I think the until more is known is actually

0:14:09.360 --> 0:14:11.720
<v Speaker 1>right around the corner. We continue to learn more and

0:14:11.760 --> 0:14:16.160
<v Speaker 1>more every day about these vaccines UM, and the transmission

0:14:16.160 --> 0:14:18.680
<v Speaker 1>piece is really important, but it's it's also important to

0:14:18.679 --> 0:14:22.400
<v Speaker 1>remember that transmission blocking only happens when you get the vaccine,

0:14:22.480 --> 0:14:25.680
<v Speaker 1>so UM that all of that work is also happening

0:14:25.720 --> 0:14:29.160
<v Speaker 1>to encourage people to get vaccine UM as we continue

0:14:29.200 --> 0:14:32.280
<v Speaker 1>to learn about this piece is really really important. So

0:14:32.720 --> 0:14:36.760
<v Speaker 1>UM making sure that people are reporting if they have

0:14:36.840 --> 0:14:40.480
<v Speaker 1>breakthrough cases, going to their doctor, getting tested regularly, all

0:14:40.560 --> 0:14:43.360
<v Speaker 1>that gives us more and more information about whether or

0:14:43.360 --> 0:14:46.280
<v Speaker 1>not we're seeing transmission happening. So, Lauren, I want to

0:14:46.280 --> 0:14:48.960
<v Speaker 1>talk about one vaccine in particular, obviously in the news

0:14:49.000 --> 0:14:51.800
<v Speaker 1>this week is Johnson and Johnson's. Are you surprised that

0:14:51.840 --> 0:14:55.000
<v Speaker 1>there hasn't been a conclusion out of the CDC and

0:14:55.000 --> 0:14:57.560
<v Speaker 1>the advisory panel yet and that one might not come

0:14:57.640 --> 0:15:01.200
<v Speaker 1>until late next week at the earliest. I think we

0:15:01.280 --> 0:15:04.200
<v Speaker 1>were hoping to see UM out of that meeting that

0:15:04.320 --> 0:15:07.400
<v Speaker 1>just happened UM the day before yesterday. I believe it

0:15:07.520 --> 0:15:11.200
<v Speaker 1>was UM a decision. We understand that, you know, this

0:15:11.360 --> 0:15:14.080
<v Speaker 1>is sort of science happening in real time, and so

0:15:14.440 --> 0:15:17.440
<v Speaker 1>where many more people are exposed to the process, but

0:15:17.520 --> 0:15:20.520
<v Speaker 1>it can happen that they want more information. I would

0:15:20.560 --> 0:15:23.360
<v Speaker 1>love to see an outcome out of that next meeting

0:15:23.480 --> 0:15:26.040
<v Speaker 1>for a determination. I think the sooner we can get

0:15:26.040 --> 0:15:29.520
<v Speaker 1>back to giving J and J vaccine, even if it

0:15:29.600 --> 0:15:35.720
<v Speaker 1>is to a slightly different population. The Better Visor's CEO says,

0:15:35.720 --> 0:15:38.920
<v Speaker 1>we'll probably need boosters, maybe even a third dose. I

0:15:39.000 --> 0:15:41.960
<v Speaker 1>just talked this morning to the Cure Vac CEO out

0:15:41.960 --> 0:15:45.320
<v Speaker 1>of Tubing in Germany. He said, it's it's likely as well.

0:15:45.440 --> 0:15:47.000
<v Speaker 1>Are we going to be in a situation where we

0:15:47.040 --> 0:15:51.920
<v Speaker 1>continue to get boosters from these vaccines. Yeah, I think

0:15:51.960 --> 0:15:55.160
<v Speaker 1>that there's a good chance that we will need boosters

0:15:55.200 --> 0:15:57.760
<v Speaker 1>for these vaccines. That that it perhaps it will look

0:15:57.840 --> 0:16:00.640
<v Speaker 1>something along the lines of how we get our vaccine

0:16:00.640 --> 0:16:04.720
<v Speaker 1>where the the vaccine strains are are evaluated during the

0:16:04.760 --> 0:16:07.640
<v Speaker 1>course of the year and then updated and boosters are given.

0:16:08.000 --> 0:16:09.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think in an ideal world, you could

0:16:09.760 --> 0:16:13.560
<v Speaker 1>even if we see that this booster schedule is similar

0:16:13.640 --> 0:16:16.320
<v Speaker 1>to something like flu, where you could put those vaccines

0:16:16.360 --> 0:16:20.080
<v Speaker 1>together and have one, you know, vaccine that covers both

0:16:20.080 --> 0:16:23.520
<v Speaker 1>flu and covid or um flu covid in RSC, you know,

0:16:23.560 --> 0:16:26.360
<v Speaker 1>all the all the all of the the sort of

0:16:27.080 --> 0:16:29.960
<v Speaker 1>seasonal diseases that we might potentially be exposed to that

0:16:30.000 --> 0:16:33.280
<v Speaker 1>we do have vaccine for. It'll take some work. Um

0:16:33.360 --> 0:16:36.360
<v Speaker 1>and you know MODERNA and Fiser are already updating their

0:16:36.440 --> 0:16:39.240
<v Speaker 1>vaccine that I think MODERNA already has an update based

0:16:39.280 --> 0:16:42.520
<v Speaker 1>on UM the B one I believe it's the B

0:16:42.600 --> 0:16:46.400
<v Speaker 1>one one seven variant UM. So the work is happening

0:16:46.440 --> 0:16:50.040
<v Speaker 1>to update the vaccines now, right, and then boosters will

0:16:50.080 --> 0:16:52.760
<v Speaker 1>be given. So, Laura, that's the booster. But when it

0:16:52.800 --> 0:16:56.160
<v Speaker 1>comes to just the initial inoculation as many as one

0:16:56.200 --> 0:16:59.600
<v Speaker 1>in three vaccines in the US are going unused in

0:16:59.720 --> 0:17:03.120
<v Speaker 1>some states, some in the South in particular. That's basically

0:17:03.120 --> 0:17:06.080
<v Speaker 1>as signed demand is slowing down. What do you chalk

0:17:06.160 --> 0:17:10.280
<v Speaker 1>that up to? Is that just hesitancy? I think it's

0:17:10.280 --> 0:17:12.960
<v Speaker 1>a mix of hesitancy and access. So the key with

0:17:13.240 --> 0:17:17.040
<v Speaker 1>fixing hesitancy is once you convince someone that the vaccine

0:17:17.080 --> 0:17:18.800
<v Speaker 1>is safe and effective and that they should get it,

0:17:18.840 --> 0:17:20.560
<v Speaker 1>and they make that decision, you have to make it

0:17:20.600 --> 0:17:22.800
<v Speaker 1>available for them, UM and they have to be able

0:17:22.800 --> 0:17:24.800
<v Speaker 1>to get it. So making sure that you have vaccine

0:17:24.840 --> 0:17:27.720
<v Speaker 1>site set up in places that populations that are a

0:17:27.760 --> 0:17:30.320
<v Speaker 1>little harder to reach can access, or people who maybe

0:17:30.320 --> 0:17:33.120
<v Speaker 1>don't have transportation or can't take off work for half

0:17:33.119 --> 0:17:36.040
<v Speaker 1>a day to wait in line at a mass vaccination site,

0:17:36.600 --> 0:17:38.480
<v Speaker 1>making it easy to get the way we do with

0:17:38.560 --> 0:17:42.560
<v Speaker 1>the flu vaccine UM. And so the hesitation piece is

0:17:42.600 --> 0:17:45.520
<v Speaker 1>really going to have to focus on messaging why this

0:17:45.600 --> 0:17:48.680
<v Speaker 1>vaccine is safe, right, reading why it's effective and important,

0:17:48.720 --> 0:17:52.000
<v Speaker 1>but also finding out what what is the barrier for them,

0:17:52.040 --> 0:17:54.280
<v Speaker 1>what would do they have concerns about, and trying to

0:17:54.359 --> 0:17:57.119
<v Speaker 1>answer those concerns. All right, Lauren, thanks very much. Laurence

0:17:57.119 --> 0:18:03.639
<v Speaker 1>hour there from John Johns Hopkins Universe. It as we

0:18:03.720 --> 0:18:07.359
<v Speaker 1>have learned, uh, certainly during this pandemic. Anyone can get

0:18:07.440 --> 0:18:12.879
<v Speaker 1>famous on social media, whether it's TikTok, YouTube or Instagram,

0:18:12.920 --> 0:18:15.760
<v Speaker 1>but it's a lot easier to make a living there

0:18:15.960 --> 0:18:19.480
<v Speaker 1>if you're white. Bloomberg's were needed Young In collaboration with Bloomberg,

0:18:19.520 --> 0:18:23.840
<v Speaker 1>Quicktake explores how marketers are under paying black influencers while

0:18:23.880 --> 0:18:27.920
<v Speaker 1>pushing Black lives matter in this program. In this Bloomberg

0:18:28.000 --> 0:18:33.240
<v Speaker 1>Radio special report, when I first started on TikTok, it

0:18:33.359 --> 0:18:35.600
<v Speaker 1>was already a big talk about how much the biggest

0:18:35.600 --> 0:18:38.720
<v Speaker 1>influencer on the app was making at the time. Comparing

0:18:38.720 --> 0:18:41.120
<v Speaker 1>that to what I was getting offered, I could tell.

0:18:41.880 --> 0:18:45.680
<v Speaker 1>Twenty two year old Sydney McCrae is an influencer and choreographer.

0:18:46.080 --> 0:18:49.359
<v Speaker 1>She's known widely for creating a viral dance to Magan

0:18:49.440 --> 0:18:57.840
<v Speaker 1>the Stallion six positive club banger Captain Hook. McCray noticed

0:18:57.840 --> 0:18:59.879
<v Speaker 1>a pay gap in the industry yes soon as she

0:19:00.160 --> 0:19:03.960
<v Speaker 1>first started making beauty tutorials on YouTube about a year ago,

0:19:04.160 --> 0:19:06.920
<v Speaker 1>and after the viral post where she explained her dance

0:19:07.000 --> 0:19:10.440
<v Speaker 1>step by step, the popular videos attracted more than four

0:19:10.520 --> 0:19:14.760
<v Speaker 1>hundred thousand likes within weeks of posting. Many of TikTok's

0:19:14.800 --> 0:19:19.199
<v Speaker 1>top stars performed their versions of McRae's choreography, also helping

0:19:19.240 --> 0:19:23.879
<v Speaker 1>the song soar in popularity. Then in April, Megan V.

0:19:24.000 --> 0:19:28.439
<v Speaker 1>Stallion herself joined in and McCray started gaining followers by

0:19:28.480 --> 0:19:32.400
<v Speaker 1>the thousands. Now she has one point one million TikTok

0:19:32.480 --> 0:19:36.680
<v Speaker 1>followers and she's verified. But she and other black digital

0:19:36.680 --> 0:19:40.480
<v Speaker 1>content creator said none of that talent or impact mattered

0:19:40.640 --> 0:19:44.600
<v Speaker 1>in the multibillion dollar global market for brand endorsement on

0:19:44.680 --> 0:19:48.080
<v Speaker 1>social media. As a content creator, seeing all of the

0:19:48.160 --> 0:19:51.680
<v Speaker 1>things that we can do for an artist or a company,

0:19:52.000 --> 0:19:55.679
<v Speaker 1>in receiving such little pay for our artistic creations, it

0:19:55.800 --> 0:19:58.400
<v Speaker 1>was a slap in the face. Really, boy, that's why

0:19:58.440 --> 0:20:02.040
<v Speaker 1>your hairline going tobaccio net. Then there's influencer in sketch

0:20:02.080 --> 0:20:05.680
<v Speaker 1>comic Kinney Knox, who started posting videos on the now

0:20:05.800 --> 0:20:09.680
<v Speaker 1>defunct six second video app Vine. The twenty two year

0:20:09.680 --> 0:20:13.359
<v Speaker 1>old followers swelled to one point six million, and he

0:20:13.480 --> 0:20:16.480
<v Speaker 1>became one of the top creators on the app. Yet

0:20:16.520 --> 0:20:20.159
<v Speaker 1>he did not get any offers for brand deals. But

0:20:20.240 --> 0:20:23.120
<v Speaker 1>he noticed his non black peers who didn't have as

0:20:23.119 --> 0:20:26.679
<v Speaker 1>many followers or activity as him did get work with

0:20:26.720 --> 0:20:29.199
<v Speaker 1>the big brands. It was weird because it was like

0:20:29.240 --> 0:20:31.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm going viral with every video, but no company is

0:20:31.840 --> 0:20:35.040
<v Speaker 1>even looking my way. When it comes to twenty five

0:20:35.119 --> 0:20:40.160
<v Speaker 1>year old Landon Moss, this influencer and actor once had

0:20:40.200 --> 0:20:43.240
<v Speaker 1>a huge brand deal with a couple of other influencers

0:20:43.280 --> 0:20:45.840
<v Speaker 1>on the same contracts. I come to find out that

0:20:45.880 --> 0:20:48.359
<v Speaker 1>they had made like devil of what I was making,

0:20:48.600 --> 0:20:50.879
<v Speaker 1>and one of them had way less followers. In me,

0:20:51.119 --> 0:20:53.120
<v Speaker 1>it was just weird to me that he had made

0:20:53.160 --> 0:20:55.480
<v Speaker 1>more money than me with less followers. And then to

0:20:55.520 --> 0:20:58.439
<v Speaker 1>think about like what I was originally offered, Like what

0:20:58.440 --> 0:21:01.640
<v Speaker 1>did they offer him? He some up the influencer pay

0:21:01.680 --> 0:21:05.879
<v Speaker 1>gap Like this. Racism isn't exclusive to a certain field,

0:21:05.920 --> 0:21:07.679
<v Speaker 1>and so even when you have new fields like the

0:21:07.720 --> 0:21:10.960
<v Speaker 1>influencer industry, it's gonna make its way in there too,

0:21:11.480 --> 0:21:15.800
<v Speaker 1>mccraine mos said Knox tell Bloomberg Quick Take. White influencers

0:21:15.800 --> 0:21:19.400
<v Speaker 1>have reposted their work or stolen their ideas which then

0:21:19.480 --> 0:21:23.639
<v Speaker 1>went viral on those accounts, but they the original creators,

0:21:23.960 --> 0:21:27.960
<v Speaker 1>got no credit. People take advantage of like black creatives

0:21:28.000 --> 0:21:30.199
<v Speaker 1>like this trend and it's all fun, and then so

0:21:30.320 --> 0:21:32.879
<v Speaker 1>on profits off something that a black career started, and

0:21:32.880 --> 0:21:35.639
<v Speaker 1>then they get praise and fame, and you know, and

0:21:35.680 --> 0:21:37.760
<v Speaker 1>when that's just the piece of us and it doesn't

0:21:37.760 --> 0:21:41.000
<v Speaker 1>stop there. These influencers say they have to be extra

0:21:41.040 --> 0:21:44.159
<v Speaker 1>careful about what they say, where, how they look, what

0:21:44.320 --> 0:21:48.880
<v Speaker 1>causes they support, so they won't offend any of the brands. Meanwhile,

0:21:48.960 --> 0:21:52.000
<v Speaker 1>they say they're white peers get away with more explicit

0:21:52.119 --> 0:21:55.680
<v Speaker 1>posts with merely a slap on the wrist from big brands.

0:21:56.359 --> 0:21:58.679
<v Speaker 1>One of the reasons why it's been such a difficult

0:21:58.760 --> 0:22:02.399
<v Speaker 1>experience for many black creators is because traditionally, in Hollywood,

0:22:02.800 --> 0:22:06.639
<v Speaker 1>racial biases have tended to flow from the top. Executives

0:22:06.720 --> 0:22:09.760
<v Speaker 1>hire white directors and producers, who in turn work with

0:22:09.840 --> 0:22:14.359
<v Speaker 1>white casting agents who cast white actors. Whenever black talent

0:22:14.480 --> 0:22:18.120
<v Speaker 1>is considered, it's often for roles or projects that specifically

0:22:18.119 --> 0:22:22.760
<v Speaker 1>require it. Social media companies have often promoted diversity initiatives,

0:22:22.880 --> 0:22:31.920
<v Speaker 1>but in practice they're not much different. Inter Summer, when

0:22:31.920 --> 0:22:35.119
<v Speaker 1>the police killing of George Floyd forced America into a

0:22:35.240 --> 0:22:39.120
<v Speaker 1>racial reckoning and sparked an international Black Lives Matter movement,

0:22:39.720 --> 0:22:43.040
<v Speaker 1>brands gained a strong desire to work with black influencers,

0:22:43.200 --> 0:22:46.280
<v Speaker 1>and black talent managers started getting more calls for their

0:22:46.280 --> 0:22:51.840
<v Speaker 1>black creators. Knox interpreted those moves this way. Appreciate the

0:22:51.920 --> 0:22:54.560
<v Speaker 1>brands working with the black creators and starting to go

0:22:54.600 --> 0:22:57.679
<v Speaker 1>in that direction, but it wasn't a trend that they

0:22:57.680 --> 0:23:01.640
<v Speaker 1>wanted to work when more black creators because they felt guilty.

0:23:01.880 --> 0:23:05.280
<v Speaker 1>Knox Masson McRae are hoping for a more equitable influencer

0:23:05.320 --> 0:23:08.240
<v Speaker 1>industry going forward. What I hope to see change in

0:23:08.119 --> 0:23:12.000
<v Speaker 1>the industry is the black creatives get the credit that

0:23:12.080 --> 0:23:17.240
<v Speaker 1>we deserve, genuine appreciation for Black creators, not just when

0:23:17.240 --> 0:23:20.480
<v Speaker 1>it's convenient, and even playing field when it comes to

0:23:21.359 --> 0:23:24.840
<v Speaker 1>creators of all colors, specifically black creators, giving them that

0:23:25.040 --> 0:23:28.320
<v Speaker 1>same energy that they're giving the white creators, and they're

0:23:28.359 --> 0:23:31.840
<v Speaker 1>hoping hashtag higher Black Creatives is not just a trend

0:23:31.960 --> 0:23:35.639
<v Speaker 1>or relegated to the diversity section, but baked into the

0:23:35.680 --> 0:23:39.360
<v Speaker 1>culture of brands in New York. I'm rent a Young.

0:23:39.520 --> 0:23:44.159
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio are many thanks to Ronda Young along with

0:23:44.240 --> 0:23:47.080
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Quick Take for that special report and Matt and

0:23:47.119 --> 0:23:49.719
<v Speaker 1>I are so lucky Rnita is joining us now in

0:23:50.040 --> 0:23:52.440
<v Speaker 1>studio or joining me now in studio, I should say

0:23:52.440 --> 0:23:55.000
<v Speaker 1>here in New York, Rnita, it was a great report.

0:23:56.760 --> 0:23:59.879
<v Speaker 1>You're here in spirit, Matt. Where is the sense for

0:24:00.119 --> 0:24:02.760
<v Speaker 1>the reporting you did of where the impetus needs to

0:24:02.840 --> 0:24:07.320
<v Speaker 1>come from for this to really change in a sticky way?

0:24:07.720 --> 0:24:11.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, I think that the sense is it needs

0:24:11.080 --> 0:24:14.760
<v Speaker 1>to not only come from a real place, but that

0:24:14.760 --> 0:24:17.680
<v Speaker 1>that's really what people mean when they say intentionality. It

0:24:17.720 --> 0:24:22.840
<v Speaker 1>needs to be an intentional elevation of these black talent

0:24:22.920 --> 0:24:25.959
<v Speaker 1>and other talent of color to the same level that

0:24:26.040 --> 0:24:31.879
<v Speaker 1>their white counterparts see, experience feel. So what about the

0:24:31.880 --> 0:24:35.439
<v Speaker 1>the income they generate for um, for the platforms. Have

0:24:35.520 --> 0:24:41.680
<v Speaker 1>you seen that black influeners influencers generate the same amount

0:24:41.800 --> 0:24:46.199
<v Speaker 1>of income for a YouTube, for example, than their white counterparts. Well,

0:24:46.240 --> 0:24:50.200
<v Speaker 1>in the article that Sarah Fryer wrote for Bloomberg Business Week,

0:24:50.200 --> 0:24:52.920
<v Speaker 1>it was in our diversity issue, UM, you can see

0:24:52.920 --> 0:24:55.800
<v Speaker 1>that one of the influencers said he made get this

0:24:56.000 --> 0:24:59.760
<v Speaker 1>one tenth what his white counterparts made, and he had

0:25:00.119 --> 0:25:04.639
<v Speaker 1>more followers and more engagement, more content as well. Is

0:25:04.680 --> 0:25:08.920
<v Speaker 1>there pressure from users on the platform for this to change?

0:25:08.920 --> 0:25:11.960
<v Speaker 1>We've seen that, you know, with investments, investors are making

0:25:12.000 --> 0:25:14.960
<v Speaker 1>companies pushed towards e s G. Do TikTok users have

0:25:15.040 --> 0:25:18.879
<v Speaker 1>that same power? You know, that's pretty interesting question there.

0:25:19.119 --> 0:25:23.080
<v Speaker 1>I would imagine that there is a conversation going on

0:25:23.160 --> 0:25:27.560
<v Speaker 1>about that, but I do not know. Uh, definitely, but

0:25:27.680 --> 0:25:30.679
<v Speaker 1>you'd expect something like that to happen, especially as the

0:25:30.720 --> 0:25:34.520
<v Speaker 1>work that you and Sarah Fryer have done gets more play.

0:25:35.040 --> 0:25:38.399
<v Speaker 1>Thanks very much for that report, Rndy Young. Thanks for

0:25:38.400 --> 0:25:41.919
<v Speaker 1>listening to the Bloomberg Markets podcast. You can subscribe and

0:25:41.960 --> 0:25:46.040
<v Speaker 1>listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast platform

0:25:46.080 --> 0:25:49.400
<v Speaker 1>you prefer. I'm Matt Miller. I'm on Twitter at Matt

0:25:49.440 --> 0:25:52.959
<v Speaker 1>Miller three. Put on false Sweeney I'm on Twitter at

0:25:53.000 --> 0:25:55.840
<v Speaker 1>pt Sweeney before the podcast. You can always catch us

0:25:55.880 --> 0:25:57.280
<v Speaker 1>worldwide at Bloomberg Radio.