WEBVTT - Apple Takes Off with Jony Ive

0:00:04.400 --> 0:00:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tech Stuff, a production from I Heart Radio.

0:00:11.800 --> 0:00:14.120
<v Speaker 1>Hey there, and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host,

0:00:14.160 --> 0:00:16.799
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Strickland. I'm an executive producer with iHeart Radio and

0:00:16.840 --> 0:00:21.040
<v Speaker 1>how the tech are you. We are continuing our series

0:00:21.040 --> 0:00:26.080
<v Speaker 1>of episodes about Johnny. I've the famous tech designer, industrial

0:00:26.160 --> 0:00:30.040
<v Speaker 1>designer who, under the guidance and support of Steve Jobs,

0:00:30.560 --> 0:00:34.240
<v Speaker 1>was instrumental in changing Apple from a company that was

0:00:34.280 --> 0:00:37.840
<v Speaker 1>on the brink of bankruptcy into a company that became

0:00:37.880 --> 0:00:40.919
<v Speaker 1>a household name in electronics. Now, if this is your

0:00:40.920 --> 0:00:43.120
<v Speaker 1>first time hearing about all this, you should look at

0:00:43.120 --> 0:00:46.920
<v Speaker 1>the episodes I published last Monday and Wednesday first, because

0:00:46.960 --> 0:00:49.559
<v Speaker 1>I've already covered a lot of ground and we're just

0:00:49.560 --> 0:00:52.840
<v Speaker 1>gonna pick up from there now. I ended the last

0:00:52.840 --> 0:00:56.720
<v Speaker 1>episode a little rushed with a summary of ives work

0:00:56.840 --> 0:00:59.440
<v Speaker 1>on the iPod, and as I mentioned in that episode,

0:00:59.480 --> 0:01:02.960
<v Speaker 1>the iPod would go on to become an iconic piece

0:01:03.000 --> 0:01:07.759
<v Speaker 1>of technology that would extend Apple's influence beyond the faithful

0:01:07.840 --> 0:01:10.399
<v Speaker 1>customers who had been Apple's bread and butter for so

0:01:10.440 --> 0:01:13.320
<v Speaker 1>many years. You know, I gotta keep in mind that

0:01:13.440 --> 0:01:16.319
<v Speaker 1>Apple was really facing a huge uphill battle while the

0:01:16.480 --> 0:01:20.200
<v Speaker 1>iMac was a big hit, and you know, especially in

0:01:20.200 --> 0:01:23.800
<v Speaker 1>like the educational sector. The truth of the matter was

0:01:23.880 --> 0:01:28.320
<v Speaker 1>is that Windows PCs still had most of the market share,

0:01:28.480 --> 0:01:32.200
<v Speaker 1>like mac had only carved out that tiny little slice

0:01:32.200 --> 0:01:36.160
<v Speaker 1>of the market share in comparison. So while while the

0:01:36.200 --> 0:01:39.480
<v Speaker 1>iMac really helped Apple out and and helped it, you know,

0:01:39.800 --> 0:01:43.520
<v Speaker 1>reel back from falling over the precipice, it was this

0:01:43.640 --> 0:01:49.240
<v Speaker 1>expansion into electronics that would really change Apple's fate. So

0:01:49.320 --> 0:01:52.840
<v Speaker 1>the iPod would ultimately reach folks who had never owned

0:01:52.880 --> 0:01:56.600
<v Speaker 1>any other Apple product, but it took a while, and

0:01:56.720 --> 0:01:58.920
<v Speaker 1>one reason for that had nothing to do with the

0:01:59.000 --> 0:02:02.000
<v Speaker 1>industrial line of the iPod, but rather the lack of

0:02:02.040 --> 0:02:06.880
<v Speaker 1>compatibility with non Apple computers. So the original iPod, the

0:02:06.920 --> 0:02:10.600
<v Speaker 1>first generation, required a Macintosh in order to synchronize the

0:02:10.600 --> 0:02:16.200
<v Speaker 1>iPod with the user's music collection, which was on iTunes. Now. Also,

0:02:16.280 --> 0:02:18.640
<v Speaker 1>at this point in Apple's history, you could not buy

0:02:18.760 --> 0:02:23.040
<v Speaker 1>digital music off of iTunes and there was no music store. Instead,

0:02:23.360 --> 0:02:26.640
<v Speaker 1>you would take your CD collection because that's what we

0:02:26.720 --> 0:02:30.079
<v Speaker 1>used to keep music on kids, and you would insert

0:02:30.240 --> 0:02:32.800
<v Speaker 1>CD by c D you would RiPP music from the

0:02:32.840 --> 0:02:36.600
<v Speaker 1>CD into iTunes. Then you could transfer the music from

0:02:36.600 --> 0:02:40.959
<v Speaker 1>your iTunes library to your iPod using a physical cable,

0:02:41.000 --> 0:02:44.320
<v Speaker 1>which is also how you would charge the iPod. It

0:02:44.360 --> 0:02:46.639
<v Speaker 1>was a FireWire cable back in the day. So this

0:02:47.000 --> 0:02:49.959
<v Speaker 1>was a point where Apple was really keeping everything within

0:02:50.000 --> 0:02:53.359
<v Speaker 1>its own ecosystem for the most part. Now, the reason

0:02:53.440 --> 0:02:57.640
<v Speaker 1>you couldn't buy digital music off iTunes in those early

0:02:57.760 --> 0:03:00.160
<v Speaker 1>days that had a lot to do with the music industry,

0:03:00.200 --> 0:03:04.440
<v Speaker 1>not with Apple. So this was a transitional phase where

0:03:04.440 --> 0:03:07.840
<v Speaker 1>the record labels held most of the leverage, though sales

0:03:07.880 --> 0:03:11.040
<v Speaker 1>of CDs and other media were starting to flag, and

0:03:11.280 --> 0:03:13.920
<v Speaker 1>it wouldn't take very long for Apple to switch that

0:03:14.000 --> 0:03:16.440
<v Speaker 1>around to get the upper hand over the music industry.

0:03:16.720 --> 0:03:20.240
<v Speaker 1>It was not instantaneous, and it did progress in phases,

0:03:20.560 --> 0:03:23.280
<v Speaker 1>but it totally happened. One other thing I wanted to

0:03:23.280 --> 0:03:27.639
<v Speaker 1>mention before we move on is that last year, this

0:03:27.800 --> 0:03:32.200
<v Speaker 1>past year one for those of y'all listening for the future, Uh,

0:03:32.360 --> 0:03:36.119
<v Speaker 1>that was iPods twentieth anniversary, So it had come out

0:03:36.200 --> 0:03:42.840
<v Speaker 1>twenty years earlier, and this year in Apple finally discontinued

0:03:42.960 --> 0:03:48.160
<v Speaker 1>all iPod models. But anyway, last year a software company

0:03:48.160 --> 0:03:51.760
<v Speaker 1>called Panic actually showed off a prototype of the iPod

0:03:52.360 --> 0:03:56.760
<v Speaker 1>and it looks absolutely nothing like what Apple would ultimately launch,

0:03:56.840 --> 0:04:01.760
<v Speaker 1>and that was on purpose. So this prototype iPod, it's

0:04:01.880 --> 0:04:05.280
<v Speaker 1>funny to even talk about. It was enormous. It was

0:04:05.320 --> 0:04:08.240
<v Speaker 1>like the size of a DVD player, and it was

0:04:08.320 --> 0:04:13.040
<v Speaker 1>also pale yellow in color. Uh had a mechanical scroll

0:04:13.040 --> 0:04:15.600
<v Speaker 1>wheel in the upper left corner of the front face

0:04:15.760 --> 0:04:19.280
<v Speaker 1>of this thing. It had four physical buttons that had

0:04:19.320 --> 0:04:22.680
<v Speaker 1>little labels that were taped onto the prototype and the

0:04:22.880 --> 0:04:25.680
<v Speaker 1>label said up, down, left, and right, so there was

0:04:25.720 --> 0:04:28.200
<v Speaker 1>like a physical switch for each of those. And it

0:04:28.279 --> 0:04:30.880
<v Speaker 1>had the Apple logo with the word iPod underneath in

0:04:30.920 --> 0:04:33.520
<v Speaker 1>the upper right corner of the device. And according to

0:04:33.520 --> 0:04:37.160
<v Speaker 1>Tony Fidel, the interior of the device was mostly empty space.

0:04:37.240 --> 0:04:40.159
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't like filled with circuitry or anything. And the

0:04:40.200 --> 0:04:43.479
<v Speaker 1>team who made it purposefully avoided anything that would look

0:04:43.520 --> 0:04:46.400
<v Speaker 1>like what the final design was supposed to be be like.

0:04:46.920 --> 0:04:49.600
<v Speaker 1>And that was just to avoid any potential leaks or

0:04:49.640 --> 0:04:53.320
<v Speaker 1>anything like that. As for the real thing, I've was

0:04:53.400 --> 0:04:57.360
<v Speaker 1>inspired by a much older piece of technology, the nineteen

0:04:57.520 --> 0:05:01.520
<v Speaker 1>fifty eight Brown T three radio, which was designed by

0:05:01.600 --> 0:05:06.480
<v Speaker 1>an industrial designer, famous industrial designer named Dieter Rams. I've,

0:05:06.920 --> 0:05:12.200
<v Speaker 1>like Rams believed in the mantra, less but better meaning

0:05:12.279 --> 0:05:15.880
<v Speaker 1>the design of whatever you're working on should not be

0:05:16.000 --> 0:05:20.239
<v Speaker 1>burdened with flourishes and unnecessary touches. I have a feeling

0:05:20.279 --> 0:05:25.480
<v Speaker 1>that Johnny I've detests baroque. If he walked through say

0:05:25.560 --> 0:05:28.200
<v Speaker 1>Hurst Castle, his eyes would probably pop out of his

0:05:28.240 --> 0:05:31.600
<v Speaker 1>head because it is probably the gaudiest place I've ever

0:05:31.680 --> 0:05:34.880
<v Speaker 1>been to, and I've been to Pigeon Forward, y'all. Now,

0:05:34.920 --> 0:05:38.560
<v Speaker 1>if you google image search the nineteen fifty eight brown

0:05:38.800 --> 0:05:42.240
<v Speaker 1>that's b R A U N T three, you'll see

0:05:42.240 --> 0:05:44.960
<v Speaker 1>a small radio that, when it stood on its end,

0:05:45.480 --> 0:05:48.839
<v Speaker 1>has a speaker that's at the top, and below that

0:05:49.080 --> 0:05:52.480
<v Speaker 1>is a radio tuning wheel. And you'll look and you'll say, yeah,

0:05:52.560 --> 0:05:54.599
<v Speaker 1>that does look a lot like an iPod where you

0:05:54.680 --> 0:05:57.000
<v Speaker 1>had the screen at the top and then you had

0:05:57.040 --> 0:06:00.840
<v Speaker 1>the little scroll wheel, the circular wheel you could, you know,

0:06:00.960 --> 0:06:04.200
<v Speaker 1>physically mechanically move in a circle. With that first generation

0:06:04.920 --> 0:06:07.880
<v Speaker 1>on there, you could definitely see the similarities. The T

0:06:08.080 --> 0:06:11.360
<v Speaker 1>three is larger than the iPod, but the T three's

0:06:11.400 --> 0:06:14.200
<v Speaker 1>influence on I've is unmistakable. That's not to say that

0:06:14.279 --> 0:06:16.760
<v Speaker 1>I've didn't make this design his own. He totally did.

0:06:17.279 --> 0:06:20.560
<v Speaker 1>But you can see sort of the pedigree of the

0:06:20.680 --> 0:06:24.880
<v Speaker 1>iPod design by comparing it to this this old radio. Now,

0:06:24.960 --> 0:06:27.760
<v Speaker 1>Johnny i'ves design of the iPod brought in a material

0:06:27.800 --> 0:06:30.599
<v Speaker 1>that Apple had not really been using for its products

0:06:30.640 --> 0:06:33.200
<v Speaker 1>up to that point, which was stainless steel. So the

0:06:33.240 --> 0:06:37.400
<v Speaker 1>front of the iPod would be white. Actually the name

0:06:37.520 --> 0:06:40.960
<v Speaker 1>of the color of the original iPod is moon gray.

0:06:41.920 --> 0:06:44.920
<v Speaker 1>The back of the iPod would be stainless steel, and

0:06:44.960 --> 0:06:47.479
<v Speaker 1>the company logo would be on the back of the

0:06:47.560 --> 0:06:51.719
<v Speaker 1>iPod on the steel side. Now, some questioned i've's decisions.

0:06:51.960 --> 0:06:53.840
<v Speaker 1>They thought it made more sense for Apple to put

0:06:53.920 --> 0:06:55.680
<v Speaker 1>the logo on the front of the device, not on

0:06:55.720 --> 0:06:58.479
<v Speaker 1>the back. But I didn't want the logo to intrude

0:06:58.480 --> 0:07:01.799
<v Speaker 1>on the experience, and he wanted to use stainless steel

0:07:01.880 --> 0:07:05.680
<v Speaker 1>partly because it would actually give the iPod some heft.

0:07:06.360 --> 0:07:08.560
<v Speaker 1>It would it would have some weight to it, and

0:07:08.640 --> 0:07:11.800
<v Speaker 1>I was thinking that weight in the hands of the

0:07:11.880 --> 0:07:15.920
<v Speaker 1>user might be associated with the work that artists were

0:07:15.920 --> 0:07:19.040
<v Speaker 1>putting into their music. That you were actually listening to

0:07:19.360 --> 0:07:22.560
<v Speaker 1>this idea that it should be heavy. It can hold

0:07:22.640 --> 0:07:25.320
<v Speaker 1>up to a thousand songs like it's a It's an

0:07:25.320 --> 0:07:30.800
<v Speaker 1>interesting leap there, because obviously music doesn't weigh anything unless

0:07:30.800 --> 0:07:32.720
<v Speaker 1>you're trying to carry a musical instrument or a lot

0:07:32.720 --> 0:07:35.160
<v Speaker 1>of sheet music. But you know, music doesn't weigh anything,

0:07:35.160 --> 0:07:37.120
<v Speaker 1>but the idea of no, but we need this device

0:07:37.160 --> 0:07:39.600
<v Speaker 1>to make it feel like it should weigh something because

0:07:40.520 --> 0:07:43.400
<v Speaker 1>it's able to hold an entire library is worth of music.

0:07:43.640 --> 0:07:45.679
<v Speaker 1>Well that's what they thought back in the day. Turns

0:07:45.680 --> 0:07:49.280
<v Speaker 1>out that people can collect way more than a thousand songs,

0:07:49.320 --> 0:07:52.239
<v Speaker 1>So that was an interesting choice one that I don't

0:07:52.560 --> 0:07:54.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how I fall. I mean, I like

0:07:54.680 --> 0:07:58.120
<v Speaker 1>the feel the weight of that first generation iPod. Actually

0:07:58.120 --> 0:08:01.400
<v Speaker 1>like the way that feels. Um. I don't necessarily associate

0:08:01.440 --> 0:08:04.040
<v Speaker 1>it with the amount of work artists put into their music,

0:08:04.080 --> 0:08:06.960
<v Speaker 1>but that may be a lack of imagination on my part. Now,

0:08:07.000 --> 0:08:11.440
<v Speaker 1>one component that wasn't ives idea on that first generation

0:08:11.480 --> 0:08:15.640
<v Speaker 1>iPod was that mechanical scroll wheel, right, that circle that

0:08:15.760 --> 0:08:18.880
<v Speaker 1>you could spin around to go through menus and stuff.

0:08:18.920 --> 0:08:23.520
<v Speaker 1>That was actually Phil Schiller's idea. Schiller was head of marketing, uh.

0:08:23.560 --> 0:08:25.760
<v Speaker 1>He would actually step in for Steve Jobs a few

0:08:25.760 --> 0:08:30.240
<v Speaker 1>times when jobs health was in decline, and Schiller had

0:08:30.280 --> 0:08:33.840
<v Speaker 1>pitched the idea of an input device that gave physical feedback.

0:08:33.960 --> 0:08:37.000
<v Speaker 1>The clicking of the wheel in this case, and so

0:08:37.080 --> 0:08:40.640
<v Speaker 1>that element did not come straight from Johnny Ives group. Now,

0:08:40.679 --> 0:08:42.800
<v Speaker 1>like I said in the last episode, the first iPods

0:08:42.840 --> 0:08:46.760
<v Speaker 1>sold well, but they it wasn't the breakout hit that

0:08:46.920 --> 0:08:50.199
<v Speaker 1>later generations of the iPod would become. I mean, if

0:08:50.760 --> 0:08:53.640
<v Speaker 1>Apple had stuck with the way they did the first iPod,

0:08:53.679 --> 0:08:57.240
<v Speaker 1>we probably wouldn't be calling these things podcasts. We'd be

0:08:57.240 --> 0:09:00.520
<v Speaker 1>calling them something else. But Apple did more than a

0:09:00.559 --> 0:09:04.000
<v Speaker 1>hundred thousand units between when the first iPod came out

0:09:04.040 --> 0:09:07.720
<v Speaker 1>in early to mid November of two thousand one and

0:09:07.760 --> 0:09:10.680
<v Speaker 1>then the end of the year, So in uh, you know,

0:09:10.880 --> 0:09:12.840
<v Speaker 1>a little more than a month, they sold a hundred

0:09:12.840 --> 0:09:16.760
<v Speaker 1>thousand units. That's not shabby. By January two thousand three,

0:09:16.800 --> 0:09:19.840
<v Speaker 1>Apple had sold more than six hundred thousand iPods, which

0:09:19.960 --> 0:09:22.880
<v Speaker 1>wasn't bad, but it did show how Apple's customer base

0:09:22.960 --> 0:09:25.640
<v Speaker 1>at this point was still fairly limited. In fact, the

0:09:25.640 --> 0:09:28.920
<v Speaker 1>company had only added support for Windows machines in August

0:09:28.960 --> 0:09:32.360
<v Speaker 1>of two thousand two. But in two thousand four things

0:09:32.360 --> 0:09:35.680
<v Speaker 1>really picked up. Apple introduced the iPod Mini, which was

0:09:35.720 --> 0:09:38.400
<v Speaker 1>a slimmed down version of the iPod that was available

0:09:38.440 --> 0:09:41.680
<v Speaker 1>in several colors, so not just moon gray that I've

0:09:41.720 --> 0:09:44.760
<v Speaker 1>really favored. In addition, the Mini was made out of

0:09:44.800 --> 0:09:49.200
<v Speaker 1>anodized aluminum, giving the iPods a different feel. Uh they

0:09:49.320 --> 0:09:52.160
<v Speaker 1>you know that the texture was different, and Ivan his

0:09:52.240 --> 0:09:54.480
<v Speaker 1>team had worked hard to find just the right material

0:09:54.559 --> 0:09:56.960
<v Speaker 1>and colors to create a line of devices that still

0:09:57.000 --> 0:09:59.080
<v Speaker 1>had the right weight and feel to them and would

0:09:59.080 --> 0:10:03.440
<v Speaker 1>be inviting. And Apple's iPod sales climbed above two million

0:10:03.559 --> 0:10:06.880
<v Speaker 1>but into January two four by the end of the year,

0:10:07.360 --> 0:10:08.840
<v Speaker 1>so that was at the end of January, but by

0:10:08.840 --> 0:10:12.680
<v Speaker 1>the end of the year they went to more than

0:10:12.840 --> 0:10:18.600
<v Speaker 1>ten million units sold. That's an astronomical climb in sales, right, Like,

0:10:19.640 --> 0:10:22.160
<v Speaker 1>it was two million by the end of January two

0:10:22.440 --> 0:10:25.240
<v Speaker 1>four by the end of the next ten eleven months

0:10:25.320 --> 0:10:30.120
<v Speaker 1>rather more than ten million. Incredible. So the iPod success

0:10:30.800 --> 0:10:33.360
<v Speaker 1>was huge both for I've as a designer and for

0:10:33.400 --> 0:10:37.440
<v Speaker 1>Apple as a company. And we'll talk about what that

0:10:37.480 --> 0:10:48.880
<v Speaker 1>meant for Apple when we come back from these messages. Okay,

0:10:48.920 --> 0:10:51.720
<v Speaker 1>So the iPod was a huge hit, and that huge

0:10:51.800 --> 0:10:54.520
<v Speaker 1>hit was enough to really convince Steve Jobs, not that

0:10:54.520 --> 0:10:57.480
<v Speaker 1>he needed much convincing anyway, but it really sealed the

0:10:57.520 --> 0:11:00.080
<v Speaker 1>deal that his own preference, which was to put it

0:11:00.200 --> 0:11:05.280
<v Speaker 1>as much emphasis on design as on things like functionality.

0:11:05.400 --> 0:11:07.480
<v Speaker 1>That was the way to go that you had to

0:11:07.559 --> 0:11:12.880
<v Speaker 1>have designed be a prime component of any product. That

0:11:13.000 --> 0:11:16.640
<v Speaker 1>couldn't just be what does the software do or how

0:11:16.679 --> 0:11:19.160
<v Speaker 1>do you access it? What's the user interface? But the

0:11:19.200 --> 0:11:21.959
<v Speaker 1>actual physical design of the product had to be just

0:11:22.000 --> 0:11:25.320
<v Speaker 1>as important, if not more so. Now you have to

0:11:25.360 --> 0:11:28.720
<v Speaker 1>remember that back then, Apple was not the brand that

0:11:28.840 --> 0:11:32.720
<v Speaker 1>it is today. The company had its rabid fans back

0:11:33.040 --> 0:11:36.760
<v Speaker 1>in you know, two thousand, two thousand one, but they

0:11:36.760 --> 0:11:39.120
<v Speaker 1>were in the minority. Apple had been the butt of

0:11:39.200 --> 0:11:42.440
<v Speaker 1>jokes in the mainstream, Like people joked about how the

0:11:42.480 --> 0:11:45.520
<v Speaker 1>Apple Mac was. You know, you don't even play games

0:11:45.520 --> 0:11:47.720
<v Speaker 1>on an Apple Mac, like there's there's nothing to play.

0:11:47.800 --> 0:11:49.840
<v Speaker 1>That wasn't true, by the way, but that was the perception.

0:11:50.400 --> 0:11:53.480
<v Speaker 1>So things were starting to turn around now, right because

0:11:54.000 --> 0:11:56.800
<v Speaker 1>the Imax had really started to catch capture a lot

0:11:56.800 --> 0:11:59.920
<v Speaker 1>of attention. They were just very fun and and love

0:12:00.080 --> 0:12:03.000
<v Speaker 1>lead designed like you wanted you wanted to have one.

0:12:03.480 --> 0:12:06.600
<v Speaker 1>It looked like candy. The iPods were a huge hit.

0:12:07.000 --> 0:12:08.880
<v Speaker 1>So now the general public, we're starting to want to

0:12:08.920 --> 0:12:11.200
<v Speaker 1>get their hands on Apple products. It was it was

0:12:11.240 --> 0:12:15.360
<v Speaker 1>going beyond the Apple Faithful, and those attractive computers and

0:12:15.360 --> 0:12:19.079
<v Speaker 1>iPods were really transforming the company. One computer that got

0:12:19.080 --> 0:12:22.520
<v Speaker 1>attention and not all of it was positive, was the

0:12:22.640 --> 0:12:26.360
<v Speaker 1>iMac G four computer, which was released in two thousand one,

0:12:26.440 --> 0:12:29.240
<v Speaker 1>so same year that the iPod came out. And if

0:12:29.240 --> 0:12:30.720
<v Speaker 1>you take a look at this, if you look at

0:12:30.720 --> 0:12:33.040
<v Speaker 1>the iMac G four, which had a couple of different

0:12:33.080 --> 0:12:36.600
<v Speaker 1>names throughout its history, you can definitely see that the

0:12:36.679 --> 0:12:42.120
<v Speaker 1>evolutionary step that existed between the iMac G three models,

0:12:42.120 --> 0:12:46.840
<v Speaker 1>which were those really colorful CRT screen computer systems that

0:12:46.840 --> 0:12:49.439
<v Speaker 1>were all in one computer system, and then you can

0:12:49.480 --> 0:12:53.880
<v Speaker 1>also see the following step after the iMac G four,

0:12:54.160 --> 0:12:56.680
<v Speaker 1>which are the more modern IMAX, which are kind of

0:12:56.720 --> 0:12:59.360
<v Speaker 1>all in one devices where you've got a flat screen

0:12:59.800 --> 0:13:02.600
<v Speaker 1>with the computer integrated right behind the flat screen and

0:13:02.640 --> 0:13:05.800
<v Speaker 1>it's on a stand. Right, That's been the IMAX of

0:13:05.960 --> 0:13:09.400
<v Speaker 1>recent years. Well, this one, the iMac G four, is

0:13:09.640 --> 0:13:13.240
<v Speaker 1>kind of in between those, though I'd say it's more

0:13:13.760 --> 0:13:16.559
<v Speaker 1>it's closer to the more recent IMAX than the old

0:13:16.960 --> 0:13:20.880
<v Speaker 1>uh G three's. So the base of this computer was

0:13:21.040 --> 0:13:25.080
<v Speaker 1>a little dome and that's where all the computer elements were,

0:13:25.200 --> 0:13:27.560
<v Speaker 1>right like that's where the optical drive was, That's where

0:13:27.600 --> 0:13:30.439
<v Speaker 1>you would plug in your peripherals, and that dome is

0:13:30.520 --> 0:13:32.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of what I think of as the nod to

0:13:33.120 --> 0:13:36.080
<v Speaker 1>the IMAX three days now. At the top of the

0:13:36.120 --> 0:13:40.880
<v Speaker 1>dome was an attached arm that you could tilt kind

0:13:40.920 --> 0:13:43.520
<v Speaker 1>of like a desk lamp, and on the end of

0:13:43.520 --> 0:13:46.040
<v Speaker 1>that arm was the flat panel display for the computer.

0:13:46.640 --> 0:13:51.520
<v Speaker 1>So it didn't have the computer incorporated behind the flat screen.

0:13:51.880 --> 0:13:54.680
<v Speaker 1>It was instead incorporated in this little dome. So it

0:13:54.760 --> 0:13:57.800
<v Speaker 1>wasn't quite the same as modern IMAX. So that's why

0:13:57.800 --> 0:13:59.839
<v Speaker 1>I say it was kind of in between. And this

0:14:00.080 --> 0:14:02.600
<v Speaker 1>was a bold move for the company. It differentiated Apple's

0:14:02.640 --> 0:14:07.240
<v Speaker 1>computers from the beige desktops associated with Windows machines, and

0:14:07.280 --> 0:14:10.439
<v Speaker 1>the company called it the New iMac at the time.

0:14:10.600 --> 0:14:13.160
<v Speaker 1>Later on they would rename it the iMac G four.

0:14:14.200 --> 0:14:17.400
<v Speaker 1>The l c D display on the New iMac wasn't cheap,

0:14:17.640 --> 0:14:21.480
<v Speaker 1>and so the New iMac was pretty expensive machine, and

0:14:21.520 --> 0:14:25.120
<v Speaker 1>the education sector, which again was one of Apple's really

0:14:25.160 --> 0:14:29.240
<v Speaker 1>big customers, kind of lagged on adopting the iMac G

0:14:29.480 --> 0:14:32.360
<v Speaker 1>four because it was so expensive. A lot of them

0:14:32.560 --> 0:14:36.640
<v Speaker 1>kept on buying the G three until Apple stopped selling them.

0:14:36.680 --> 0:14:40.200
<v Speaker 1>In two thousand four, Apple would unveil the iMac G five. Now,

0:14:40.240 --> 0:14:43.120
<v Speaker 1>this was the first of the Imax to incorporate the

0:14:43.160 --> 0:14:46.480
<v Speaker 1>computer behind the flat display itself, and it would all

0:14:46.520 --> 0:14:49.400
<v Speaker 1>be supported on an L shaped stand that would be

0:14:49.440 --> 0:14:52.960
<v Speaker 1>on your desk. Now, unlike later Imax which would have

0:14:53.240 --> 0:14:56.400
<v Speaker 1>aluminium cases like the most recent ones have aluminium cases,

0:14:56.920 --> 0:15:00.400
<v Speaker 1>the iMac G five had a white case, and I've

0:15:00.440 --> 0:15:02.760
<v Speaker 1>insisted on that. He felt that the screen was meant

0:15:02.760 --> 0:15:06.080
<v Speaker 1>to capture the user's attention, like all their attention should

0:15:06.080 --> 0:15:08.480
<v Speaker 1>be on the screen. The screen was beautiful, it was

0:15:08.480 --> 0:15:11.440
<v Speaker 1>the focal point for the computer. So he wanted a

0:15:11.640 --> 0:15:15.920
<v Speaker 1>really minimalist approach on the case so that you wouldn't

0:15:16.120 --> 0:15:18.120
<v Speaker 1>your eyes wouldn't be drawn to something else, You would

0:15:18.120 --> 0:15:21.600
<v Speaker 1>be focused on what was important, and everything else like

0:15:21.640 --> 0:15:23.680
<v Speaker 1>the keyboard and the mouse would all be a simple

0:15:23.680 --> 0:15:27.440
<v Speaker 1>white as well, again not to pull focus from the display.

0:15:27.480 --> 0:15:30.360
<v Speaker 1>Now back to the iPod. The introduction of the iPod

0:15:30.480 --> 0:15:33.600
<v Speaker 1>Nano in two thousand five, which would replace the Mini,

0:15:33.680 --> 0:15:36.480
<v Speaker 1>would change things up again. The first generation of the

0:15:36.520 --> 0:15:39.960
<v Speaker 1>Nano was available only in white or black, and it

0:15:40.000 --> 0:15:42.600
<v Speaker 1>had a screen measuring just one point eight inches on

0:15:42.640 --> 0:15:46.440
<v Speaker 1>the diagonal. The second generation added a few more features

0:15:46.520 --> 0:15:50.040
<v Speaker 1>as well as some more color options. The third generation

0:15:50.040 --> 0:15:53.440
<v Speaker 1>would change the form factor by having the candy bar

0:15:53.600 --> 0:15:57.440
<v Speaker 1>like dimensions of the first two generations trade off for

0:15:57.680 --> 0:15:59.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, like a Graham Cracker kind of dimension.

0:15:59.840 --> 0:16:04.120
<v Speaker 1>It was more squarish than a rectangle. Uh So the

0:16:04.160 --> 0:16:07.720
<v Speaker 1>actual physical form factor changed and that design would flip

0:16:07.760 --> 0:16:10.960
<v Speaker 1>flop a bit between those over the following generations until

0:16:11.000 --> 0:16:15.520
<v Speaker 1>Apple just playing Out discontinued the nano. So yeah, So

0:16:15.600 --> 0:16:18.680
<v Speaker 1>again it was Ive's team kind of working on different

0:16:18.680 --> 0:16:22.440
<v Speaker 1>things to try and experiment with different design layouts, and

0:16:22.480 --> 0:16:24.480
<v Speaker 1>sometimes they would go back to an idea that they

0:16:24.480 --> 0:16:27.240
<v Speaker 1>had had before, you know, refined it a bit. So

0:16:27.280 --> 0:16:31.000
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't like you know, the I Pod, the nanos

0:16:31.080 --> 0:16:34.720
<v Speaker 1>of of you know, two thousand ten looked exactly like

0:16:34.760 --> 0:16:36.840
<v Speaker 1>the ones from two thousand seven. It wasn't like that,

0:16:37.560 --> 0:16:41.240
<v Speaker 1>But they did kind of experiment with those different form factors.

0:16:41.840 --> 0:16:44.640
<v Speaker 1>I've also had a hand with the iPod Shuffle, which

0:16:44.680 --> 0:16:46.560
<v Speaker 1>didn't have a screen at all on it, so you

0:16:46.600 --> 0:16:49.080
<v Speaker 1>had no screen to look at. Instead, you would load

0:16:49.200 --> 0:16:51.760
<v Speaker 1>music on this device, you would play it in shuffle mode.

0:16:52.000 --> 0:16:55.120
<v Speaker 1>You could play it in just you know, regular nodes

0:16:55.120 --> 0:16:57.480
<v Speaker 1>that would play in order, but typically it was shuffle

0:16:57.560 --> 0:16:59.920
<v Speaker 1>mode and it would just sort of randomly shuffle up

0:16:59.920 --> 0:17:02.240
<v Speaker 1>the song order for you and play whatever. And it

0:17:02.320 --> 0:17:04.960
<v Speaker 1>had simple controls for advancing or going back through songs,

0:17:05.000 --> 0:17:08.080
<v Speaker 1>plus volume controls and a play pause button and that

0:17:08.160 --> 0:17:10.639
<v Speaker 1>was about it. Like it had the little headphone jack

0:17:11.040 --> 0:17:13.680
<v Speaker 1>and that's you know, he didn't have much more after that.

0:17:14.240 --> 0:17:15.920
<v Speaker 1>The first one looked kind of like a stick of gum.

0:17:16.400 --> 0:17:18.240
<v Speaker 1>You could actually pull the end off. It was a

0:17:18.320 --> 0:17:22.640
<v Speaker 1>cap for a USB that could be you know, plugged

0:17:22.640 --> 0:17:25.880
<v Speaker 1>into a computer. The second generation looked more like a stamp,

0:17:26.400 --> 0:17:30.680
<v Speaker 1>like it was you know, rectangular in dimension. The third

0:17:30.720 --> 0:17:33.119
<v Speaker 1>generation of the Shuffle would be the boldest of the

0:17:33.200 --> 0:17:37.000
<v Speaker 1>designs because I've and his team created one that lacked

0:17:37.040 --> 0:17:41.120
<v Speaker 1>any physical controls other than a power control. So instead

0:17:41.280 --> 0:17:45.040
<v Speaker 1>all of the controls for changing the volume or advancing

0:17:45.080 --> 0:17:49.120
<v Speaker 1>through a track, all of that moved to Apple's iPod earbuds,

0:17:49.520 --> 0:17:53.280
<v Speaker 1>which I've also designed, which meant that initially, at least

0:17:53.280 --> 0:17:56.320
<v Speaker 1>the third generation of the Shuffle had limited functionality if

0:17:56.359 --> 0:17:59.679
<v Speaker 1>you weren't using Apple's own earbuds, so you couldn't just

0:17:59.760 --> 0:18:03.879
<v Speaker 1>you know, plug any earphones into a shuffle of this

0:18:03.960 --> 0:18:07.040
<v Speaker 1>generation and be able to control it. You'd be able

0:18:07.040 --> 0:18:08.960
<v Speaker 1>to listen to music, but you wouldn't be able to

0:18:09.000 --> 0:18:10.520
<v Speaker 1>do things like change the volume, So if it was

0:18:10.560 --> 0:18:12.600
<v Speaker 1>too loud or too quiet, you couldn't do anything about it.

0:18:13.280 --> 0:18:14.879
<v Speaker 1>And if a song came on that you didn't want

0:18:14.880 --> 0:18:16.600
<v Speaker 1>to hear, there was no way to skip it unless

0:18:16.600 --> 0:18:20.159
<v Speaker 1>you were using the the Apple earbuds which had the

0:18:20.200 --> 0:18:24.560
<v Speaker 1>controls on them. Eventually, third parties would come up with

0:18:24.600 --> 0:18:28.000
<v Speaker 1>their own earbuds that would have controls that were interoperable

0:18:28.119 --> 0:18:31.119
<v Speaker 1>with this shuffle, but this was one of those decisions

0:18:31.520 --> 0:18:34.359
<v Speaker 1>that had people kind of complaining about Apple. Apple has

0:18:34.400 --> 0:18:39.120
<v Speaker 1>a reputation for uh making moves to trap people into

0:18:39.200 --> 0:18:43.640
<v Speaker 1>an ecosystem, whether it's with peripherals or with their approach

0:18:43.680 --> 0:18:49.200
<v Speaker 1>to software um and that you know customers, consumers tend

0:18:49.240 --> 0:18:51.800
<v Speaker 1>to like to have a lot of options, right Like

0:18:52.720 --> 0:18:55.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people would much prefer to be able

0:18:55.240 --> 0:18:59.080
<v Speaker 1>to pair their favorite headphones with their favorite music device.

0:18:59.600 --> 0:19:02.960
<v Speaker 1>But Apple was taking an approach where, at least to

0:19:03.080 --> 0:19:05.280
<v Speaker 1>have the ideal experience, you really need to be all

0:19:05.359 --> 0:19:08.040
<v Speaker 1>in on Apple, something that I think was really true

0:19:08.119 --> 0:19:12.879
<v Speaker 1>even when Apple opened up iTunes to Windows machines. But

0:19:12.920 --> 0:19:14.880
<v Speaker 1>I've complained about that too many times in the past,

0:19:14.880 --> 0:19:16.400
<v Speaker 1>so I'm not going to pick that up again here.

0:19:17.920 --> 0:19:21.120
<v Speaker 1>The fourth generation Shuffle would actually bring back those physical

0:19:21.160 --> 0:19:25.040
<v Speaker 1>controls onto the device itself, which seems to be an

0:19:25.080 --> 0:19:28.320
<v Speaker 1>admission that perhaps the third generation may have gone too far.

0:19:28.520 --> 0:19:30.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, some bold moves just end up being the

0:19:30.320 --> 0:19:33.520
<v Speaker 1>wrong ones, it turns out, or at least maybe if

0:19:33.560 --> 0:19:35.439
<v Speaker 1>you want to say it's not the wrong move, it

0:19:35.520 --> 0:19:37.720
<v Speaker 1>might be a move that just doesn't resonate with the

0:19:37.760 --> 0:19:41.520
<v Speaker 1>general public as well. And then after all that, we

0:19:41.560 --> 0:19:47.640
<v Speaker 1>would have a device that really would push Apple into

0:19:47.640 --> 0:19:51.520
<v Speaker 1>the next level. So to to kind of some up

0:19:51.520 --> 0:19:54.879
<v Speaker 1>what we've been looking at so far. With the Johnny

0:19:54.960 --> 0:19:57.280
<v Speaker 1>Ives tenure at Apple, you know, he came in during

0:19:57.280 --> 0:20:00.800
<v Speaker 1>a tumultuous time where the company was heading toward disaster.

0:20:02.040 --> 0:20:05.080
<v Speaker 1>He was encouraged by Steve Jobs to help design a

0:20:06.080 --> 0:20:11.600
<v Speaker 1>new generation of Macintosh computer that brought attention back to

0:20:11.600 --> 0:20:14.359
<v Speaker 1>Apple on a level that had not been there for years,

0:20:14.400 --> 0:20:17.919
<v Speaker 1>Like positive attention, the company had largely been dismissed at

0:20:17.920 --> 0:20:21.720
<v Speaker 1>that point. He had helped introduce a new product line

0:20:21.840 --> 0:20:26.080
<v Speaker 1>with iPods a new whole business for Apple, which when

0:20:26.200 --> 0:20:29.320
<v Speaker 1>paired with iTunes and the iTunes store, would end up

0:20:29.359 --> 0:20:33.480
<v Speaker 1>being a lucrative business for Apple. But what would come

0:20:33.520 --> 0:20:38.000
<v Speaker 1>next would really push the company into the stratosphere. We'll

0:20:38.000 --> 0:20:40.720
<v Speaker 1>talk about that when we come back after these messages.

0:20:48.800 --> 0:20:52.000
<v Speaker 1>All right, this is where we're getting up to round

0:20:52.040 --> 0:20:57.040
<v Speaker 1>two thousand seven. And if you know Apple and you

0:20:57.119 --> 0:20:59.680
<v Speaker 1>know your timelines, you know that two thousand seven is

0:20:59.720 --> 0:21:03.919
<v Speaker 1>when we get the iPhone and who boy. So the

0:21:03.960 --> 0:21:07.919
<v Speaker 1>iPod established Apple as a household name in electronics. The

0:21:07.960 --> 0:21:13.080
<v Speaker 1>iPhone would move the company into hyperspace. So when Steve

0:21:13.160 --> 0:21:16.200
<v Speaker 1>Jobs unveiled the iPhone back in two thousand and seven,

0:21:16.840 --> 0:21:20.960
<v Speaker 1>it took the world by storm, which was particularly remarkable

0:21:21.040 --> 0:21:23.119
<v Speaker 1>because I don't know how many of you remember this,

0:21:23.200 --> 0:21:26.680
<v Speaker 1>but here in the United States, when the iPhone launched,

0:21:27.760 --> 0:21:30.440
<v Speaker 1>it was exclusive to a T and T. You could

0:21:30.520 --> 0:21:34.600
<v Speaker 1>not have the iPhone running on any other carrier. So

0:21:34.880 --> 0:21:38.000
<v Speaker 1>if you were a Sprint customer, or a Verizon customer

0:21:38.119 --> 0:21:41.760
<v Speaker 1>or T Mobile customer, then you would have to switch

0:21:42.280 --> 0:21:45.200
<v Speaker 1>carriers if you wanted to get an iPhone. There was

0:21:45.240 --> 0:21:49.159
<v Speaker 1>a big limitation, and yet the iPhone was still a

0:21:49.280 --> 0:21:55.199
<v Speaker 1>remarkable hit for Apple, and when Steve Jobs took the

0:21:55.240 --> 0:21:58.000
<v Speaker 1>stage in two thousand seven to talk about this to

0:21:58.119 --> 0:22:03.479
<v Speaker 1>unveil it, he drilled home to the audience that he

0:22:03.560 --> 0:22:07.560
<v Speaker 1>was going to introduce products that represented an iPod, a

0:22:07.640 --> 0:22:12.160
<v Speaker 1>mobile phone, and an Internet communications device. And the implication

0:22:12.200 --> 0:22:14.679
<v Speaker 1>at first was that these were three different products. But

0:22:14.720 --> 0:22:17.040
<v Speaker 1>then he reveals, no, I'm talking about one thing that

0:22:17.320 --> 0:22:19.479
<v Speaker 1>that happens to be all three of these, and that

0:22:19.560 --> 0:22:22.480
<v Speaker 1>was the iPhone. So he gave a very long presentation

0:22:23.080 --> 0:22:25.320
<v Speaker 1>about the iPhone that day. It's like a couple of hours.

0:22:25.320 --> 0:22:27.160
<v Speaker 1>You can actually find it on YouTube. You can watch

0:22:27.200 --> 0:22:29.959
<v Speaker 1>the whole thing if you like. And he spent some

0:22:30.040 --> 0:22:32.639
<v Speaker 1>of that time to talk about the design of the phone.

0:22:32.720 --> 0:22:37.520
<v Speaker 1>Although it was in pretty general terms. He pointed out

0:22:37.560 --> 0:22:42.160
<v Speaker 1>that there were minimal physical controls on the device. There

0:22:42.200 --> 0:22:44.119
<v Speaker 1>was a home button that would take you back to

0:22:44.119 --> 0:22:47.000
<v Speaker 1>the home page wherever you happen to be. There was

0:22:47.119 --> 0:22:50.000
<v Speaker 1>a wake slash sleep button, so you could, you know,

0:22:50.359 --> 0:22:53.800
<v Speaker 1>turn the phone on or off. There was a volume control,

0:22:54.400 --> 0:22:56.399
<v Speaker 1>and there was a switch to turn the phone to

0:22:56.560 --> 0:22:59.680
<v Speaker 1>ring or silent mode. It also had front facing and

0:22:59.760 --> 0:23:02.479
<v Speaker 1>rear facing cameras, had a back that was made out

0:23:02.520 --> 0:23:05.520
<v Speaker 1>of aluminum. The front was originally going to be plastic,

0:23:06.080 --> 0:23:08.680
<v Speaker 1>but Steve Jobs noticed that his early model he was

0:23:08.720 --> 0:23:11.000
<v Speaker 1>carrying around was starting to get scratched up, and so

0:23:11.800 --> 0:23:14.880
<v Speaker 1>the team at the last minute had to change the

0:23:14.920 --> 0:23:17.359
<v Speaker 1>determination to make it go to glass. The one that

0:23:17.480 --> 0:23:20.240
<v Speaker 1>you'll see in the presentation that that Steve Jobs is

0:23:20.280 --> 0:23:23.320
<v Speaker 1>showing off, that's the one that has a plastic face.

0:23:23.800 --> 0:23:26.199
<v Speaker 1>The one that would go to market would have a

0:23:26.280 --> 0:23:32.240
<v Speaker 1>glass face. Now that design change, uh was a big one.

0:23:32.320 --> 0:23:34.159
<v Speaker 1>I'll talk about it a little bit more and what

0:23:34.280 --> 0:23:36.280
<v Speaker 1>the team had to do in order to make it work.

0:23:36.440 --> 0:23:40.240
<v Speaker 1>It was pretty remarkable, and the design of the iPhone

0:23:40.280 --> 0:23:45.200
<v Speaker 1>overall followed that less but Better philosophy. So, unlike other smartphones,

0:23:45.600 --> 0:23:48.200
<v Speaker 1>iPhone did not have a physical keyboard. If you look

0:23:48.240 --> 0:23:52.200
<v Speaker 1>at the smartphones around two thousand seven, you'll see that

0:23:52.359 --> 0:23:55.600
<v Speaker 1>all of them pretty much have a third to about

0:23:55.640 --> 0:23:58.360
<v Speaker 1>a half of the phone taken up by a display

0:23:58.440 --> 0:24:00.119
<v Speaker 1>and the rest of the phone taken up by a

0:24:00.160 --> 0:24:03.880
<v Speaker 1>physical keyboard with little plastic keys and some navigation buttons.

0:24:04.680 --> 0:24:09.680
<v Speaker 1>And Steve Jobs hated that he wanted to have a

0:24:09.720 --> 0:24:13.480
<v Speaker 1>touch screen device, and because of that, it meant that

0:24:13.520 --> 0:24:16.879
<v Speaker 1>you could dedicate the entire almost the entire front of

0:24:16.880 --> 0:24:19.680
<v Speaker 1>the phone to the screen, which measured three and a

0:24:19.720 --> 0:24:23.120
<v Speaker 1>half inches on the diagonal for the original iPhone. Now

0:24:23.160 --> 0:24:25.639
<v Speaker 1>above the screen was the front facing camera, the speaker

0:24:25.680 --> 0:24:28.480
<v Speaker 1>for your ear, that kind of thing. Beneath the screen

0:24:28.560 --> 0:24:31.960
<v Speaker 1>was the home button, and there was a fairly narrow

0:24:32.200 --> 0:24:35.000
<v Speaker 1>bezel on either side of the screen. So it was

0:24:35.000 --> 0:24:38.879
<v Speaker 1>a pretty simple and elegant approach to a smartphone with

0:24:38.960 --> 0:24:42.000
<v Speaker 1>most of the focus going on the display, just like

0:24:42.119 --> 0:24:45.919
<v Speaker 1>with the newer iMac computers that were coming out. The

0:24:45.960 --> 0:24:49.199
<v Speaker 1>glass that would cover the iPhone was special, and it

0:24:49.320 --> 0:24:51.920
<v Speaker 1>ended up being a special kind of glass that Corning

0:24:52.440 --> 0:24:56.480
<v Speaker 1>had been working on in its R and D department. Uh,

0:24:56.560 --> 0:24:59.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, because Apple was looking everywhere to find someone

0:24:59.480 --> 0:25:03.840
<v Speaker 1>who could deuced glass that wouldn't scratch or shatter easily.

0:25:04.000 --> 0:25:06.280
<v Speaker 1>They needed something that was going to be durable, especially

0:25:06.280 --> 0:25:08.800
<v Speaker 1>for a device that could, you know, on occasion, maybe

0:25:08.800 --> 0:25:11.840
<v Speaker 1>slip out of your hand and hit the floor. So

0:25:12.880 --> 0:25:16.119
<v Speaker 1>they looked at this special glass Corning had developed, and

0:25:16.200 --> 0:25:19.480
<v Speaker 1>this was stuff that would later evolve with the commercial

0:25:19.600 --> 0:25:23.520
<v Speaker 1>name Guerrilla Glass. That's a popular brand of glass that

0:25:23.520 --> 0:25:26.359
<v Speaker 1>has scratch and shadow resistant properties. It's really cool. I

0:25:26.640 --> 0:25:29.119
<v Speaker 1>once wrote an article on how guerrilla glass works for

0:25:29.160 --> 0:25:32.200
<v Speaker 1>how stuff works way back in the day, so um yeah,

0:25:32.240 --> 0:25:33.680
<v Speaker 1>and that was great. I got to talk to people

0:25:33.720 --> 0:25:35.959
<v Speaker 1>at Corning and everything to learn more about the actual

0:25:36.080 --> 0:25:40.000
<v Speaker 1>engineering that was required to make this happen. Now, at

0:25:40.000 --> 0:25:41.960
<v Speaker 1>the time that they were using it for the iPhone,

0:25:42.840 --> 0:25:46.240
<v Speaker 1>this stuff hadn't really found its way into any consumer products.

0:25:46.240 --> 0:25:48.000
<v Speaker 1>It was still kind of an R and D thing.

0:25:48.320 --> 0:25:50.320
<v Speaker 1>So this is an example of how Steve Jobs and

0:25:50.400 --> 0:25:53.040
<v Speaker 1>Johnny I would go to great links to make sure

0:25:53.080 --> 0:25:55.960
<v Speaker 1>that their vision would be realized, even if it meant

0:25:55.960 --> 0:25:58.240
<v Speaker 1>having to make use of an experimental material in order

0:25:58.240 --> 0:26:00.280
<v Speaker 1>to do it well. I should also add that Jeff

0:26:00.320 --> 0:26:03.040
<v Speaker 1>Williams played a critical part in getting the glass from

0:26:03.080 --> 0:26:06.320
<v Speaker 1>Corning incorporated into the iPhone design. I know, when I

0:26:06.359 --> 0:26:08.480
<v Speaker 1>talk about this, it makes it sound like Johnny Ivan

0:26:08.520 --> 0:26:11.119
<v Speaker 1>Steve Jobs did everything at Apple on their own and

0:26:11.160 --> 0:26:14.280
<v Speaker 1>just raised it from the mud and put it into

0:26:14.280 --> 0:26:17.920
<v Speaker 1>the heavens. That's not the case. There were clearly hundreds

0:26:17.920 --> 0:26:21.640
<v Speaker 1>and thousands of people working at Apple who made these

0:26:21.680 --> 0:26:25.240
<v Speaker 1>things possible. Some of them took on, you know, leadership roles,

0:26:25.280 --> 0:26:28.479
<v Speaker 1>so people like Jeff Williams and Johnny I've and Steve Jobs.

0:26:29.080 --> 0:26:31.399
<v Speaker 1>But you know, I don't ever want to take away

0:26:31.440 --> 0:26:34.439
<v Speaker 1>from the fact that these things exist because of the

0:26:34.440 --> 0:26:39.679
<v Speaker 1>collaboration of lots of incredibly talented people. Now, a lot

0:26:39.720 --> 0:26:43.120
<v Speaker 1>of the design elements of the iPhone would obviously find

0:26:43.119 --> 0:26:46.679
<v Speaker 1>their way into the iPod Touch. In fact, you know,

0:26:46.720 --> 0:26:48.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people said the iPod Touch was really

0:26:48.840 --> 0:26:52.800
<v Speaker 1>just an iPhone only without the phone part. And the

0:26:52.840 --> 0:26:56.720
<v Speaker 1>iPod Touch had also a multi touch display, meaning that

0:26:56.760 --> 0:26:59.200
<v Speaker 1>you could do multi finger gestures on it, like pinch

0:26:59.280 --> 0:27:01.800
<v Speaker 1>to zoom, that the stuff. But it also had a

0:27:01.800 --> 0:27:05.480
<v Speaker 1>lower resolution screen than the iPhone did, so it wasn't

0:27:05.560 --> 0:27:07.640
<v Speaker 1>as sharp as what you would get with the iPhone.

0:27:08.280 --> 0:27:11.160
<v Speaker 1>It also lacked physical volume buttons for the first generation

0:27:11.200 --> 0:27:13.600
<v Speaker 1>of the iPod Touch, which was something that irritated some

0:27:13.840 --> 0:27:17.880
<v Speaker 1>reviewers and some users. Uh. You could actually use an

0:27:17.880 --> 0:27:21.800
<v Speaker 1>iPod Touch as a phone if you enabled the WiFi

0:27:21.960 --> 0:27:25.040
<v Speaker 1>and you used apps like Skype. Actually know someone who

0:27:25.080 --> 0:27:27.240
<v Speaker 1>did that for a while. My buddy I as actor

0:27:27.359 --> 0:27:30.600
<v Speaker 1>who uh who produces content for a c net he

0:27:30.840 --> 0:27:34.600
<v Speaker 1>um for a while was using an iPod Touch as

0:27:34.600 --> 0:27:37.400
<v Speaker 1>his primary phone. And uh, one of these days I'm

0:27:37.400 --> 0:27:39.120
<v Speaker 1>just gonna have to have him on the show again

0:27:39.600 --> 0:27:42.159
<v Speaker 1>and talk about how that worked out for him and

0:27:42.320 --> 0:27:44.960
<v Speaker 1>was it convenient or what did he like about why

0:27:44.960 --> 0:27:47.199
<v Speaker 1>did he hate about it? Sometimes I think having a

0:27:47.280 --> 0:27:50.199
<v Speaker 1>WiFi only phone would be great because anytime I'm not

0:27:50.240 --> 0:27:54.040
<v Speaker 1>around WiFi, I wouldn't have any notifications. And I'm just

0:27:54.280 --> 0:27:58.600
<v Speaker 1>I've I've obviously reached the age where uh notifications are

0:27:58.640 --> 0:28:00.840
<v Speaker 1>the bane of my existence, and I tried to avoid

0:28:00.840 --> 0:28:04.800
<v Speaker 1>them at all costs. Anyway, back to Ivan Apple, you

0:28:04.800 --> 0:28:08.840
<v Speaker 1>would also clearly see Johnny i'ves influence and the release

0:28:08.960 --> 0:28:12.280
<v Speaker 1>of the iPad, which came out in twenty And in

0:28:12.320 --> 0:28:15.520
<v Speaker 1>case some of y'all didn't know, I usually say this

0:28:15.600 --> 0:28:18.280
<v Speaker 1>whenever I talk about the iPad, so you probably have

0:28:18.320 --> 0:28:20.320
<v Speaker 1>heard me say this before, even if you haven't heard

0:28:20.359 --> 0:28:24.280
<v Speaker 1>the original episode. Way back in the day, I infamously

0:28:24.480 --> 0:28:28.160
<v Speaker 1>dismissed the iPad when it was first coming out. I said,

0:28:28.200 --> 0:28:30.000
<v Speaker 1>this is not gonna work. It's gonna be a flop.

0:28:30.080 --> 0:28:32.800
<v Speaker 1>No one's gonna want this. I could not imagine that

0:28:32.840 --> 0:28:36.639
<v Speaker 1>people would flock to a tablet computer, and the reason

0:28:36.720 --> 0:28:39.960
<v Speaker 1>for that was because in the past, tablets had really

0:28:40.000 --> 0:28:44.160
<v Speaker 1>only found a place in niche markets, Like you know,

0:28:44.520 --> 0:28:47.800
<v Speaker 1>in the medicine field, there were places where you know,

0:28:48.520 --> 0:28:52.520
<v Speaker 1>doctors and nurses were using tablet computers, but it just

0:28:52.840 --> 0:28:55.720
<v Speaker 1>never managed to take off as a mainstream product. And

0:28:55.760 --> 0:28:57.800
<v Speaker 1>I was convinced that that was just that was just

0:28:57.800 --> 0:29:00.640
<v Speaker 1>gonna be the case, that even Apple would not be

0:29:00.680 --> 0:29:04.400
<v Speaker 1>able to produce something in that form factor that would

0:29:04.440 --> 0:29:09.080
<v Speaker 1>appeal to the average person. And I could not have

0:29:09.160 --> 0:29:14.080
<v Speaker 1>been more wrong. So I've actually provided a bit of philosophy.

0:29:14.240 --> 0:29:18.120
<v Speaker 1>When he talked about the iPad later on, he once said, quote,

0:29:18.600 --> 0:29:22.400
<v Speaker 1>when something exceeds your ability to understand how it works,

0:29:22.600 --> 0:29:26.080
<v Speaker 1>it's sort of becomes magical. And that's exactly what the

0:29:26.120 --> 0:29:29.840
<v Speaker 1>iPad is. End quote, which I think of a sort

0:29:29.880 --> 0:29:35.200
<v Speaker 1>of paraphrasing Arthur C. Clark, the science fiction author. Clark

0:29:35.320 --> 0:29:41.640
<v Speaker 1>once said that any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.

0:29:42.240 --> 0:29:46.239
<v Speaker 1>That if the technology is advanced enough to someone not

0:29:46.400 --> 0:29:49.800
<v Speaker 1>schooled in that tech, it would seem to be impossible.

0:29:50.000 --> 0:29:51.560
<v Speaker 1>And you think about that, like if you were to

0:29:51.640 --> 0:29:55.520
<v Speaker 1>somehow go back in time to I don't know, the

0:29:55.600 --> 0:30:01.520
<v Speaker 1>Renaissance and show off a computer somehow get it running,

0:30:01.560 --> 0:30:03.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how you would do it as the results.

0:30:03.200 --> 0:30:05.840
<v Speaker 1>But let's say you did, everyone would think that you

0:30:05.880 --> 0:30:09.880
<v Speaker 1>were you were, you were magical, and you probably would

0:30:09.920 --> 0:30:12.760
<v Speaker 1>be persecuted because that's just the way the world goes

0:30:12.880 --> 0:30:17.160
<v Speaker 1>right anyway, he was more or less saying that the

0:30:17.160 --> 0:30:20.640
<v Speaker 1>iPad was magical. It fell into that realm martely because

0:30:20.640 --> 0:30:22.560
<v Speaker 1>of the way that you would interact with the device.

0:30:23.520 --> 0:30:26.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, you literally had to put your hands on

0:30:26.720 --> 0:30:30.440
<v Speaker 1>whatever it was you were doing. And there is something

0:30:30.480 --> 0:30:35.080
<v Speaker 1>to that, right that your interaction when you're touching something directly,

0:30:35.480 --> 0:30:39.120
<v Speaker 1>even if that directly is through a screen, it creates

0:30:39.120 --> 0:30:43.960
<v Speaker 1>some more connected experience. You know, Steve Jobs, when you

0:30:44.000 --> 0:30:47.800
<v Speaker 1>introduced the iPhone, talked about getting your hands on your

0:30:47.960 --> 0:30:51.440
<v Speaker 1>music because you were physically touching your screen in order

0:30:51.480 --> 0:30:56.160
<v Speaker 1>to play specific songs, as opposed to typing something out

0:30:56.160 --> 0:30:59.040
<v Speaker 1>on a physical keyboard, which adds a bit of distance

0:30:59.080 --> 0:31:01.880
<v Speaker 1>between you and whatever it is you want to do.

0:31:02.840 --> 0:31:08.880
<v Speaker 1>It's that connection that cuts out those other input forms

0:31:08.920 --> 0:31:11.440
<v Speaker 1>that could otherwise act as sort of a barrier between

0:31:11.440 --> 0:31:13.760
<v Speaker 1>you and whatever it was you were doing. It's an

0:31:13.800 --> 0:31:18.440
<v Speaker 1>interesting thought. I don't know how much I buy into it,

0:31:18.480 --> 0:31:22.000
<v Speaker 1>but I do think there is something there. Uh and

0:31:22.200 --> 0:31:23.640
<v Speaker 1>it meant that you were going to be able to

0:31:23.720 --> 0:31:26.920
<v Speaker 1>interact with stuff on a screen very much like an iPhone,

0:31:26.960 --> 0:31:31.920
<v Speaker 1>but on a size at much greater scale. Obviously, now

0:31:33.280 --> 0:31:36.160
<v Speaker 1>we're going to start to to wind down here because

0:31:36.200 --> 0:31:38.440
<v Speaker 1>I have one more episode in this series I want

0:31:38.440 --> 0:31:43.040
<v Speaker 1>to do, and it really ties into the decline of

0:31:43.080 --> 0:31:49.000
<v Speaker 1>Steve Jobs as health. His health would obviously have a

0:31:49.280 --> 0:31:54.400
<v Speaker 1>huge impact on the operations at Apple and on Apple's future. Uh.

0:31:54.440 --> 0:32:00.000
<v Speaker 1>He had first been diagnosed with pancreatic cancer back into

0:32:00.080 --> 0:32:05.000
<v Speaker 1>thousand three. He underwent a surgery to remove it, and

0:32:05.120 --> 0:32:08.520
<v Speaker 1>he mostly kept it under wraps from even his close

0:32:08.560 --> 0:32:11.080
<v Speaker 1>friends at Apple until two thousand four, when he did

0:32:11.120 --> 0:32:14.080
<v Speaker 1>send out a message to everyone at Apple letting them

0:32:14.080 --> 0:32:18.440
<v Speaker 1>know what had been going on, and there was hope

0:32:19.320 --> 0:32:23.200
<v Speaker 1>that the surgery he had undergone had had removed all

0:32:23.200 --> 0:32:27.280
<v Speaker 1>the cancer and that he was cancer free and healthy.

0:32:27.320 --> 0:32:31.960
<v Speaker 1>But obviously over the following years that would change. So

0:32:32.200 --> 0:32:36.400
<v Speaker 1>in our next episode, we're gonna talk about Steve Jobs

0:32:36.480 --> 0:32:40.840
<v Speaker 1>and his failing health and ultimately his his passing, how

0:32:40.880 --> 0:32:45.120
<v Speaker 1>that affected Apple in general and Johnny I've in particular,

0:32:46.080 --> 0:32:50.920
<v Speaker 1>and how at least some people say that set the

0:32:50.960 --> 0:32:54.560
<v Speaker 1>path for Johnny I've ultimately to step away from the

0:32:54.560 --> 0:32:58.320
<v Speaker 1>company he had fallen in love with um not that

0:32:58.400 --> 0:33:01.760
<v Speaker 1>it was the one and only factor that that went

0:33:01.800 --> 0:33:06.680
<v Speaker 1>into that decision, but that that was the starting point.

0:33:07.200 --> 0:33:09.840
<v Speaker 1>We'll talk about that in our next episode. I hope

0:33:09.840 --> 0:33:13.040
<v Speaker 1>you've been enjoying these It's been really interesting to dive

0:33:13.160 --> 0:33:18.560
<v Speaker 1>into Johnny i've's history and his influence at Apple, something

0:33:18.600 --> 0:33:21.600
<v Speaker 1>that was clearly really important. And in the next episode

0:33:21.640 --> 0:33:25.280
<v Speaker 1>we'll also talk about what we might expect with Apple

0:33:25.400 --> 0:33:28.320
<v Speaker 1>moving forward without Johnny ivan It. But that's for the

0:33:28.320 --> 0:33:31.480
<v Speaker 1>next episode. If you have suggestions for episode topics, well

0:33:31.640 --> 0:33:33.600
<v Speaker 1>let me know. One way to do that is to

0:33:33.680 --> 0:33:36.560
<v Speaker 1>download the I heart Radio app. It's free to download.

0:33:37.080 --> 0:33:40.120
<v Speaker 1>You can navigate over to the tech Stuff podcast page

0:33:40.640 --> 0:33:43.680
<v Speaker 1>use that little microphone icon to leave up to thirty

0:33:43.720 --> 0:33:45.560
<v Speaker 1>seconds of a voice message let me know what you

0:33:45.600 --> 0:33:47.960
<v Speaker 1>would like me to talk about, or you can reach

0:33:47.960 --> 0:33:50.480
<v Speaker 1>out on Twitter. The handle for the show is text

0:33:50.480 --> 0:33:54.840
<v Speaker 1>stuff hsw and I'll talk to you again really soon.

0:34:00.440 --> 0:34:03.480
<v Speaker 1>Tex Stuff is an I heart Radio production. For more

0:34:03.560 --> 0:34:06.960
<v Speaker 1>podcasts from I Heart Radio, visit the i heart Radio app,

0:34:07.080 --> 0:34:10.240
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.