WEBVTT - 5/3, Part 1: Waiver wire bids, weekend matchups, and more...

0:00:00.560 --> 0:00:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Hey, thanks for downloading the podcast, and remember, if you

0:00:03.680 --> 0:00:07.160
<v Speaker 1>want to listen live, download the I Heart Radio app,

0:00:07.240 --> 0:00:10.080
<v Speaker 1>download the tune and app and just search for Fantasy

0:00:10.240 --> 0:00:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Sports Radio Network and you can listen to this program live. Also,

0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:17.360
<v Speaker 1>if you want to watch the video of this podcast,

0:00:17.600 --> 0:00:21.000
<v Speaker 1>check us out on YouTube, on twitch, or on Periscope

0:00:21.120 --> 0:00:25.079
<v Speaker 1>and type in you guess Fantasy Sports Network. You'll find

0:00:25.160 --> 0:00:30.480
<v Speaker 1>us there. Enjoy the show and thanks for listening. You're

0:00:30.600 --> 0:00:39.400
<v Speaker 1>listening to the Fantasy Sports Radio Network Fantasy Best Friends Forever.

0:00:49.920 --> 0:00:52.840
<v Speaker 1>Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do

0:00:52.840 --> 0:00:55.800
<v Speaker 1>Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do

0:00:55.800 --> 0:01:04.479
<v Speaker 1>do doo. Yeah, this is not Fantasy Best Friends Forever.

0:01:04.880 --> 0:01:07.600
<v Speaker 1>Here in the Fantasy Sports Radio Network. It's alongside for

0:01:07.680 --> 0:01:11.760
<v Speaker 1>Rankie Standville. I am Greg Susman. It's going on about

0:01:12.800 --> 0:01:16.440
<v Speaker 1>how's it going? Happy Friday, Happy Nixton Zel Day, Gregy

0:01:16.959 --> 0:01:19.119
<v Speaker 1>x L days. He as well. I'd sleep last night.

0:01:19.600 --> 0:01:23.679
<v Speaker 1>It's so great, you know. I slept. I slept great.

0:01:23.760 --> 0:01:26.280
<v Speaker 1>I had a one dream that I remembered where I

0:01:26.319 --> 0:01:29.120
<v Speaker 1>was on a bus with my mom and sister, on

0:01:29.240 --> 0:01:32.280
<v Speaker 1>a bus right as bus my mom and sister. And

0:01:33.400 --> 0:01:35.280
<v Speaker 1>last night I had a few beers here with a

0:01:35.280 --> 0:01:37.640
<v Speaker 1>friend that it randomly saw us during the NBA Fantasy

0:01:37.640 --> 0:01:41.920
<v Speaker 1>Hour and then I went home. We had cheestaks for dinner.

0:01:42.000 --> 0:01:46.080
<v Speaker 1>It was like delicious, right messy night for so I

0:01:46.160 --> 0:01:48.840
<v Speaker 1>had a dream and the bust of my mom saying

0:01:48.840 --> 0:01:50.600
<v Speaker 1>that I needed to go on the thirty two for

0:01:50.800 --> 0:01:54.520
<v Speaker 1>thirty diet isn't the real thing? I was like, do

0:01:54.520 --> 0:01:56.720
<v Speaker 1>you know who you're talking to? It's your's it's me.

0:01:56.880 --> 0:01:59.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to go do on this third what? And

0:01:59.320 --> 0:02:01.240
<v Speaker 1>it was like you have to like the gym like

0:02:01.360 --> 0:02:04.280
<v Speaker 1>thirty two times in thirty days, and like are you out?

0:02:04.640 --> 0:02:07.640
<v Speaker 1>What is wrong with you? Terribly? What are you kidding me?

0:02:07.680 --> 0:02:10.000
<v Speaker 1>Would anyone do that? You gotta do it for the wedding?

0:02:10.600 --> 0:02:14.960
<v Speaker 1>Like this, this isn't happening. So I welcome angry, I dit,

0:02:15.320 --> 0:02:18.280
<v Speaker 1>but it's not real. Sound good? Have you ever heard

0:02:18.280 --> 0:02:22.000
<v Speaker 1>the term Greg shed to wed? I? I have? Yes?

0:02:22.360 --> 0:02:24.800
<v Speaker 1>Are you shedding to wed right now? Greg? I'm not

0:02:24.880 --> 0:02:27.160
<v Speaker 1>on the white at the moment. Given the three beers

0:02:27.360 --> 0:02:30.440
<v Speaker 1>and cheese steak I had last night, Frank oh Man,

0:02:30.560 --> 0:02:32.680
<v Speaker 1>and we're just gonna pick up where you left off

0:02:32.760 --> 0:02:35.679
<v Speaker 1>last night tonight. Maybe he'll say it's gonna be a

0:02:35.680 --> 0:02:38.200
<v Speaker 1>fun night night. Well should be, it should be a

0:02:38.200 --> 0:02:43.359
<v Speaker 1>good time. Um, I'm a little we'll see how it goes.

0:02:45.280 --> 0:02:49.480
<v Speaker 1>So goes all before the show officially starts four, we

0:02:49.480 --> 0:02:52.480
<v Speaker 1>can get into waiver wires. Twelve team leagues, fifteen team leagues,

0:02:52.680 --> 0:02:55.760
<v Speaker 1>we'll talk about nixons ll a little bit. Did what how?

0:02:55.760 --> 0:02:58.600
<v Speaker 1>Did you sleep very well? Which is a change of pace.

0:02:58.720 --> 0:03:01.720
<v Speaker 1>It's good I slept well. Um, if anyone was listening

0:03:01.760 --> 0:03:03.480
<v Speaker 1>to the Morning After, I feel like you have to

0:03:03.480 --> 0:03:06.600
<v Speaker 1>separate myself a little bit from you, Greg, because I

0:03:06.639 --> 0:03:09.920
<v Speaker 1>am now being lumped into the things that you like

0:03:10.919 --> 0:03:14.160
<v Speaker 1>means that I like them. And Gabe was talking a

0:03:14.160 --> 0:03:17.720
<v Speaker 1>lot about how the assumption was that I also liked

0:03:17.760 --> 0:03:23.040
<v Speaker 1>Maroon five along with you. That's not the case. I'm starting.

0:03:23.040 --> 0:03:25.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm starting to get lumped in with the with the

0:03:25.840 --> 0:03:30.840
<v Speaker 1>pop top forties, Greg Susman musical choice that is just

0:03:30.880 --> 0:03:35.040
<v Speaker 1>not true. I don't know man gave speaks gospel. I'm

0:03:35.080 --> 0:03:39.120
<v Speaker 1>all over the place. Ye Metallic six or seven times.

0:03:39.200 --> 0:03:41.520
<v Speaker 1>I would love a Metallic a halftime show, I said, well,

0:03:41.560 --> 0:03:43.360
<v Speaker 1>but I understand what they try to do with the

0:03:43.360 --> 0:03:46.120
<v Speaker 1>halftime show. They're trying trying to appeal to everybody who's

0:03:46.160 --> 0:03:49.000
<v Speaker 1>not a football fan just sitting there and watched. It's

0:03:49.000 --> 0:03:51.440
<v Speaker 1>not for us. I don't watch it. I watched wrestling

0:03:51.440 --> 0:03:55.480
<v Speaker 1>instead this year. It was very good. I don't know,

0:03:55.480 --> 0:03:57.720
<v Speaker 1>I gotta start to establish something here because everyone's starting

0:03:57.720 --> 0:04:01.160
<v Speaker 1>to think that I liked Taylor Swift and I like,

0:04:01.240 --> 0:04:03.240
<v Speaker 1>come round five. It's just not true. Guys. Come on,

0:04:03.800 --> 0:04:06.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I gotta establish myself somehow. So I'm like,

0:04:09.520 --> 0:04:12.040
<v Speaker 1>that's all. I had to get that off my chest.

0:04:12.240 --> 0:04:13.520
<v Speaker 1>Do you feel like he got off your test now?

0:04:14.280 --> 0:04:17.280
<v Speaker 1>Feeling a little bit better? All right, so let's um,

0:04:17.600 --> 0:04:19.920
<v Speaker 1>it's way over wide Friday. There is no Michael Florio today.

0:04:19.920 --> 0:04:21.600
<v Speaker 1>He was too busy for us. Remember his friends were

0:04:21.600 --> 0:04:23.000
<v Speaker 1>coming like an hour or two, so we had to

0:04:23.040 --> 0:04:26.400
<v Speaker 1>get ready, right. Yeah, I believe that was what it is.

0:04:26.440 --> 0:04:27.920
<v Speaker 1>He was at the Angels game last night. I saw

0:04:27.920 --> 0:04:30.680
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of videos. I retweeted the video. I am

0:04:30.720 --> 0:04:34.200
<v Speaker 1>pretty jealous that you got to see the Handsel Robusts

0:04:34.279 --> 0:04:38.159
<v Speaker 1>Undertaker thing live because that looked awesome. The music was

0:04:38.240 --> 0:04:40.120
<v Speaker 1>blasting to undertake your feel like that would just get

0:04:40.160 --> 0:04:42.040
<v Speaker 1>me pumped. Cool, that would get me pumped. Files at

0:04:42.040 --> 0:04:43.600
<v Speaker 1>the game. He also got to see my Trout home run.

0:04:43.680 --> 0:04:46.680
<v Speaker 1>So that's cool. It's not cool. He texted me last

0:04:46.680 --> 0:04:48.960
<v Speaker 1>week and said, I'm going to Toronto and the Angels.

0:04:49.160 --> 0:04:53.839
<v Speaker 1>I get to see Trout versus Vlad Glad was not

0:04:53.920 --> 0:04:57.600
<v Speaker 1>in the lineup. Oh poor Mike. That's what you get

0:04:57.600 --> 0:05:02.040
<v Speaker 1>from ditchings. Sorry Mike, Sorry, but he's not here today.

0:05:02.120 --> 0:05:04.840
<v Speaker 1>He's not here. An that you're definitely join us an

0:05:04.839 --> 0:05:07.800
<v Speaker 1>hour too, also, an hour too. It's gonna be fun.

0:05:08.160 --> 0:05:10.480
<v Speaker 1>It's gonna be a fun hour too, because we're gonna

0:05:10.480 --> 0:05:14.800
<v Speaker 1>play a game today and we're gonna have somebody when

0:05:14.800 --> 0:05:16.919
<v Speaker 1>tickets to the Yankee game tonight. We have tickets to

0:05:16.920 --> 0:05:21.120
<v Speaker 1>give away on the show. I am the first time. Yeah,

0:05:21.240 --> 0:05:24.040
<v Speaker 1>you want do you do? You want the tickets? Well?

0:05:24.040 --> 0:05:27.039
<v Speaker 1>Can we can? We bring everybody? Uh, there are four tickets.

0:05:27.720 --> 0:05:29.480
<v Speaker 1>Now you want to separate you want to separate them

0:05:29.480 --> 0:05:30.920
<v Speaker 1>in two and two and you want to give somebody

0:05:30.920 --> 0:05:36.400
<v Speaker 1>four tickets away. Um, there's a good question. I agree,

0:05:37.400 --> 0:05:41.680
<v Speaker 1>m M, I guess it. Let's let's basics off of well,

0:05:41.720 --> 0:05:43.039
<v Speaker 1>what are you gonna do? Are you gonna give them away?

0:05:43.040 --> 0:05:44.400
<v Speaker 1>You're gonna do some kind of trivia or some kind

0:05:44.400 --> 0:05:50.000
<v Speaker 1>of so pre planned for today's show. I have an

0:05:50.000 --> 0:05:53.240
<v Speaker 1>around the horn set up for you and Chris to

0:05:53.240 --> 0:05:55.600
<v Speaker 1>play against each other. I have set this up. I

0:05:55.600 --> 0:05:58.400
<v Speaker 1>have all my questions here with my answers. I was

0:05:58.440 --> 0:06:01.480
<v Speaker 1>going to include Alex in the game as well, and

0:06:01.520 --> 0:06:07.320
<v Speaker 1>I can include the audience participant as well, or I

0:06:07.360 --> 0:06:17.520
<v Speaker 1>could have whoever calls in try to. It's got a

0:06:17.560 --> 0:06:21.680
<v Speaker 1>text message, so we'll help with this during the break.

0:06:23.000 --> 0:06:25.360
<v Speaker 1>All right, we have an update. We're away. We're gonnaway

0:06:25.400 --> 0:06:28.000
<v Speaker 1>Yankee tickets. I have still definitely give it away. We're

0:06:28.000 --> 0:06:32.640
<v Speaker 1>definitely giving away Ankazy. It was a great up date. Um,

0:06:32.720 --> 0:06:34.800
<v Speaker 1>we will definitely have away a tickets. An hour to

0:06:35.120 --> 0:06:36.840
<v Speaker 1>the game will be adjusted. I have a hole around

0:06:36.839 --> 0:06:38.760
<v Speaker 1>the horse set up. It's gonna be a blast um,

0:06:39.160 --> 0:06:41.560
<v Speaker 1>and I think we might I might leave out adventure

0:06:41.640 --> 0:06:44.200
<v Speaker 1>and just have somebody versus you and if they beat you,

0:06:44.400 --> 0:06:46.919
<v Speaker 1>they get the tickets. That's going on. Want of thinking, Okay, Yankees,

0:06:46.960 --> 0:06:49.800
<v Speaker 1>Twinston I too. It's fun game, James Paxson, potentially the

0:06:49.839 --> 0:06:52.720
<v Speaker 1>return of Miguel and Harst. So it's gonna be awesome,

0:06:52.760 --> 0:06:54.599
<v Speaker 1>good Yankee tickets. So we'll let you know when we

0:06:54.680 --> 0:06:58.240
<v Speaker 1>open the phone. Lines for that, so get ready for

0:06:58.240 --> 0:06:59.839
<v Speaker 1>it to be really fun. So we really really fun show.

0:07:00.680 --> 0:07:02.120
<v Speaker 1>Get to the waibor wire before we get any of that,

0:07:02.160 --> 0:07:05.359
<v Speaker 1>though already on the waiver wire. Not really. There's nobody

0:07:05.400 --> 0:07:07.599
<v Speaker 1>that you're gonna spend a jillion dollars on, I don't

0:07:07.720 --> 0:07:10.440
<v Speaker 1>think besides one name that really stands out if he's

0:07:10.440 --> 0:07:13.640
<v Speaker 1>available in your league, and that for me is Alex Verduga.

0:07:14.000 --> 0:07:15.840
<v Speaker 1>We talked a lot about these guys that we're gonna

0:07:15.840 --> 0:07:18.200
<v Speaker 1>mention today on the show throughout the week, but now

0:07:18.240 --> 0:07:20.080
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna tell you, like who you could drop for them,

0:07:20.120 --> 0:07:22.000
<v Speaker 1>how much you want to spend on that stuff like that.

0:07:22.440 --> 0:07:25.560
<v Speaker 1>So Verdugo is probably the number one guy on the

0:07:25.600 --> 0:07:28.800
<v Speaker 1>list for me here with a j pollock out indefinitely

0:07:28.920 --> 0:07:34.400
<v Speaker 1>essentially with this elbow injury, Verdugo at own in Yahoo

0:07:34.480 --> 0:07:37.120
<v Speaker 1>leagues right now. How much of your budget do you

0:07:37.120 --> 0:07:41.640
<v Speaker 1>think you should be spending on Alex Roduga? I can

0:07:41.720 --> 0:07:48.480
<v Speaker 1>see going let's say twelve to on the aggressive side.

0:07:48.520 --> 0:07:51.960
<v Speaker 1>I still do have some concerns about his game overall.

0:07:52.000 --> 0:07:53.720
<v Speaker 1>I think he's a great player. I think he's gonna

0:07:54.480 --> 0:07:58.000
<v Speaker 1>right now. He's a guy that as a plus hit tool,

0:07:58.040 --> 0:07:59.840
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna hit for a batting average. He's gonna hit

0:07:59.880 --> 0:08:01.600
<v Speaker 1>for a lot of doubles. I don't know if the

0:08:01.640 --> 0:08:03.400
<v Speaker 1>power is there yet. He strikes me as a guy

0:08:03.440 --> 0:08:06.040
<v Speaker 1>that as he gets older, will grow into his power

0:08:06.600 --> 0:08:08.960
<v Speaker 1>as long as he performs. I'm not really worried about

0:08:09.000 --> 0:08:11.800
<v Speaker 1>aj Pollock because Polck has always hurt. Even if he

0:08:11.800 --> 0:08:13.840
<v Speaker 1>comes back after the chance that he reinjures himself. And

0:08:13.840 --> 0:08:16.200
<v Speaker 1>if Alex Verdugo just takes off while Pollock is gone

0:08:16.320 --> 0:08:18.119
<v Speaker 1>and he's gonna find a way to stay in the lineup,

0:08:18.240 --> 0:08:20.320
<v Speaker 1>They're gonna find ways for him to stay in the

0:08:20.360 --> 0:08:23.360
<v Speaker 1>lineup for as long as possible if he is performing,

0:08:23.360 --> 0:08:25.360
<v Speaker 1>and I think he can. He's holding his own against

0:08:25.400 --> 0:08:27.080
<v Speaker 1>lefty so far this year. I know the Dodgers like

0:08:27.120 --> 0:08:30.240
<v Speaker 1>to do lots of splitsy type things, but overall, I

0:08:30.320 --> 0:08:33.080
<v Speaker 1>do like his game. I expect batting average. Obviously, there

0:08:33.120 --> 0:08:34.920
<v Speaker 1>could be counting stats if he's hitting in the middle

0:08:35.120 --> 0:08:37.520
<v Speaker 1>of the Dodgers lineup. He stole a base the other day,

0:08:37.559 --> 0:08:39.440
<v Speaker 1>so that maybe that's another wrinkle that he's adding to

0:08:39.480 --> 0:08:42.400
<v Speaker 1>his game. Overall, I don't know that the power will

0:08:42.440 --> 0:08:45.360
<v Speaker 1>be vast at first, but a couple of years down

0:08:45.360 --> 0:08:48.600
<v Speaker 1>the line. Potentially it is you want to be aggressive,

0:08:48.679 --> 0:08:52.840
<v Speaker 1>Greg Um, Well, if you're in a five outfieler league

0:08:52.880 --> 0:08:54.800
<v Speaker 1>and really need an outfaller, I could see going higher

0:08:54.800 --> 0:08:56.440
<v Speaker 1>than that, but that's kind of where I settle in

0:08:56.480 --> 0:09:00.400
<v Speaker 1>right now. So yeah, I think that for to go

0:09:00.679 --> 0:09:02.240
<v Speaker 1>you really lead it out right that if he hits,

0:09:02.240 --> 0:09:03.520
<v Speaker 1>he's going to stay in the line up. Some of

0:09:03.520 --> 0:09:06.880
<v Speaker 1>the carter keeping really need to start doing a sap um.

0:09:06.920 --> 0:09:12.040
<v Speaker 1>But we wanted him. We said before you run of

0:09:12.040 --> 0:09:15.079
<v Speaker 1>the waiver wire, if anybody got hurt, and then somebody didn't,

0:09:15.559 --> 0:09:17.439
<v Speaker 1>I know, we're now done with April. You're into the

0:09:17.480 --> 0:09:20.960
<v Speaker 1>second month. Ten percent. Is that enough? That's my question?

0:09:21.120 --> 0:09:24.480
<v Speaker 1>Is it enough? Should you go closer to if he

0:09:24.600 --> 0:09:28.440
<v Speaker 1>the must own? I think it comes down to need again,

0:09:28.520 --> 0:09:30.520
<v Speaker 1>which is what I said. You know, if you need

0:09:30.559 --> 0:09:32.120
<v Speaker 1>if you play in a five outfielder league and you

0:09:32.200 --> 0:09:33.840
<v Speaker 1>really need an atfeeler, even if you don't play in

0:09:33.880 --> 0:09:35.520
<v Speaker 1>the five outfield of the league, if if it turns

0:09:35.520 --> 0:09:37.600
<v Speaker 1>out you know you had Stanton on your team, or

0:09:37.640 --> 0:09:39.520
<v Speaker 1>you just have guys that are slumping and it's just

0:09:39.520 --> 0:09:41.240
<v Speaker 1>not working out right now, you need an out feeler.

0:09:41.280 --> 0:09:44.000
<v Speaker 1>I could see going above fifteen percent, maybe closer to

0:09:44.360 --> 0:09:47.920
<v Speaker 1>that twenty percent that Gregg's talking about. But it feels

0:09:47.960 --> 0:09:49.760
<v Speaker 1>like every week we have at least one or two

0:09:49.760 --> 0:09:51.480
<v Speaker 1>players that we come on here and we talk about

0:09:52.679 --> 0:09:56.360
<v Speaker 1>ten percent. If you're gonna be aggressive, the thing is

0:09:56.400 --> 0:09:58.160
<v Speaker 1>you can't You can't afford to do it every week,

0:09:58.640 --> 0:10:00.439
<v Speaker 1>So you kind of have to pick and choose your spots.

0:10:00.480 --> 0:10:02.920
<v Speaker 1>If you've been aggressive already in the first month of

0:10:02.920 --> 0:10:05.960
<v Speaker 1>the season on guys like Glynn Frasier, Mike Saroka, Carter

0:10:06.080 --> 0:10:08.920
<v Speaker 1>Key Boom, you might not be able to afford to

0:10:09.040 --> 0:10:12.000
<v Speaker 1>be really aggressive. Where with Alex Verdugo right now, which

0:10:12.559 --> 0:10:15.319
<v Speaker 1>me myself, I'm personally learning from because in the main event,

0:10:15.400 --> 0:10:17.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't have a lot of money left. It's a

0:10:17.000 --> 0:10:19.840
<v Speaker 1>fifteen team league, Alex Verdugo is not available, it's not

0:10:19.920 --> 0:10:22.040
<v Speaker 1>a great waiver wider week overall, So I think at

0:10:22.120 --> 0:10:24.520
<v Speaker 1>least for this week, I'll be all right, But overall,

0:10:24.559 --> 0:10:25.920
<v Speaker 1>I really got to be smart about where I pick

0:10:25.960 --> 0:10:28.439
<v Speaker 1>and choose my spot. So if you've been aggressive with

0:10:28.480 --> 0:10:30.240
<v Speaker 1>some of these other guys earlier on in the season,

0:10:30.280 --> 0:10:32.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that you can afford to put down

0:10:32.040 --> 0:10:35.160
<v Speaker 1>that twenty percent that we're talking about on Alex Verdugo.

0:10:35.200 --> 0:10:36.960
<v Speaker 1>But overall, Greg, it comes down to need. If you

0:10:37.000 --> 0:10:39.160
<v Speaker 1>really need an outfielder, I can see doing it. But

0:10:39.240 --> 0:10:41.480
<v Speaker 1>as of now, I settling at that twelve to the

0:10:41.920 --> 0:10:44.959
<v Speaker 1>question is do you drop A J. Pollock for Alex Verdugo.

0:10:45.679 --> 0:10:50.000
<v Speaker 1>Klow hesitation there. I'm just not really an AJ Pollock guy.

0:10:50.080 --> 0:10:52.520
<v Speaker 1>We have, We have enough of us sample size now

0:10:52.559 --> 0:10:54.920
<v Speaker 1>with him. He's been hurt every year. This this is

0:10:54.960 --> 0:10:57.480
<v Speaker 1>an elbow infection. Something has happened to his elbow. You

0:10:57.559 --> 0:11:00.800
<v Speaker 1>heard it from Dr A yesterday. He's it's a surgically

0:11:00.840 --> 0:11:03.160
<v Speaker 1>repaired elbow. He has like a metal plate in his

0:11:03.240 --> 0:11:06.560
<v Speaker 1>elbow and somewhere along the line there's an infection. So

0:11:06.600 --> 0:11:08.079
<v Speaker 1>we don't really know how long he's gonna be out

0:11:08.080 --> 0:11:10.560
<v Speaker 1>if this is something that's gonna linger, and even if

0:11:10.559 --> 0:11:12.120
<v Speaker 1>it's not an elbow, this is a guy who, once

0:11:12.120 --> 0:11:14.520
<v Speaker 1>he comes back, he's an extremely high injury risk because

0:11:14.520 --> 0:11:16.240
<v Speaker 1>he's had so many other things go on with him

0:11:16.320 --> 0:11:18.400
<v Speaker 1>in the past. I didn't really love the signing of

0:11:18.400 --> 0:11:20.240
<v Speaker 1>A J. Pollock when he went to the Dodgers. Kind

0:11:20.240 --> 0:11:22.360
<v Speaker 1>of spoke about this, Greg when we were talking about

0:11:22.440 --> 0:11:25.760
<v Speaker 1>Verdugo two or three weeks ago. Um, it didn't really

0:11:25.760 --> 0:11:28.760
<v Speaker 1>make sense that they signed Pollock unless they don't really

0:11:28.760 --> 0:11:31.840
<v Speaker 1>trust Verdugo yet. But now he was starting to push

0:11:31.880 --> 0:11:34.040
<v Speaker 1>playing time against Polock anyway, So overall I just didn't

0:11:34.080 --> 0:11:37.280
<v Speaker 1>really understand the signing of Pollock in a vacuum. Yes,

0:11:37.320 --> 0:11:41.120
<v Speaker 1>I would drop him for Alex Verdugo. Would you drop

0:11:41.200 --> 0:11:48.000
<v Speaker 1>your boy Malex Smith or Alex Verdugo? Um? I think

0:11:48.000 --> 0:11:51.960
<v Speaker 1>it depends on need. If this guy will not stop amazing,

0:11:52.040 --> 0:11:54.400
<v Speaker 1>if you need stolen bases, you know, I don't think

0:11:54.440 --> 0:11:58.480
<v Speaker 1>Alex Verdugo is gonna give you that. In a vacuum, Greg, yes,

0:11:59.640 --> 0:12:01.720
<v Speaker 1>that was a you're looking for. Overall, I wouldn't want

0:12:01.720 --> 0:12:03.600
<v Speaker 1>to drop Malex Smith. I would still try and find

0:12:03.600 --> 0:12:06.160
<v Speaker 1>someone else because I do still believe that he has

0:12:06.800 --> 0:12:09.280
<v Speaker 1>forty stolen base upside and I don't gonna stand by that.

0:12:09.400 --> 0:12:12.080
<v Speaker 1>Would you if you just want someone who's gonna help you? Now?

0:12:12.880 --> 0:12:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Would you drop j Bruster Alex for Alex? Okay? Would

0:12:17.200 --> 0:12:25.480
<v Speaker 1>you drop Ryan O'Hearn yes? Would you drop hmm? Kyle

0:12:25.559 --> 0:12:29.280
<v Speaker 1>Schober yes? One more? Would you drop Dan vogel Bach

0:12:29.360 --> 0:12:37.360
<v Speaker 1>for him? Mm? Hmm? No, Okay I don't know, gosh

0:12:37.360 --> 0:12:41.360
<v Speaker 1>I would either, would you drop Eulie Guriel for him? No?

0:12:41.559 --> 0:12:43.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't have any shares of Gurriel, so I don't

0:12:43.640 --> 0:12:45.800
<v Speaker 1>really know what he's been up to. But I feel

0:12:45.800 --> 0:12:49.040
<v Speaker 1>like some people have been asking if they can drop him.

0:12:49.040 --> 0:12:51.960
<v Speaker 1>So let's see. Let's dive in here, grety, let's see

0:12:52.000 --> 0:12:56.680
<v Speaker 1>what we're Uli Gurriel is up to this season. Um

0:12:56.800 --> 0:12:59.120
<v Speaker 1>mine drive rate is a career high right now, by

0:12:59.200 --> 0:13:01.679
<v Speaker 1>far thirty one percent. I mean that is massive. He's

0:13:01.679 --> 0:13:04.360
<v Speaker 1>actually hitting more flyballs this year, but he has he

0:13:04.400 --> 0:13:06.240
<v Speaker 1>has a two sixty babbit, much lower than his to

0:13:06.679 --> 0:13:12.720
<v Speaker 1>nine career babbit. Um m hmm. I think I would

0:13:12.800 --> 0:13:16.920
<v Speaker 1>drop Eulie Guriel for Alex Verdugo. But overall, just looking

0:13:16.960 --> 0:13:18.920
<v Speaker 1>at the battle ball day, I do think better days

0:13:18.920 --> 0:13:21.720
<v Speaker 1>are coming for Guriel. Without looking, don't scroll up, just

0:13:21.720 --> 0:13:28.480
<v Speaker 1>say where you are there? How old is Uliet? On

0:13:28.640 --> 0:13:31.280
<v Speaker 1>June nine, one month from now, he'll be thirty five

0:13:31.360 --> 0:13:34.880
<v Speaker 1>years old. I knew he was older because when he

0:13:34.920 --> 0:13:38.920
<v Speaker 1>came over he wasn't a young prospect, ready to play player.

0:13:42.040 --> 0:13:44.400
<v Speaker 1>Did not know that. How about the playing time? What's

0:13:44.440 --> 0:13:47.240
<v Speaker 1>the playing time been like for he has? I do

0:13:47.360 --> 0:13:49.120
<v Speaker 1>like this tool that, yeah, who has when if you

0:13:49.120 --> 0:13:50.560
<v Speaker 1>click on their name, you can just kind of see

0:13:50.559 --> 0:13:54.120
<v Speaker 1>how often they play. Uh, since played every game, but

0:13:54.160 --> 0:13:56.360
<v Speaker 1>one pretty much plays every day. And it's a really

0:13:56.360 --> 0:14:00.440
<v Speaker 1>good lineup. So you asked me or Verdugo, I would

0:14:00.440 --> 0:14:04.079
<v Speaker 1>take Verdugo, but maybe try and find someone else to

0:14:04.160 --> 0:14:05.720
<v Speaker 1>drop instead of Gore yea. I think better days are

0:14:05.760 --> 0:14:08.160
<v Speaker 1>coming for him. If Verdugo is your top guy that's

0:14:08.240 --> 0:14:12.280
<v Speaker 1>on the waiver wire hitter wise, who's next? Assuming that

0:14:12.360 --> 0:14:15.600
<v Speaker 1>has Yeller isn't out there, so I don't want We

0:14:15.600 --> 0:14:17.960
<v Speaker 1>talked about him a lot this week. If Verdigo is

0:14:18.000 --> 0:14:20.640
<v Speaker 1>not out there, who's another hitter that you would say

0:14:20.800 --> 0:14:25.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm interested in significantly? Probably Nate low of the Tampa

0:14:25.360 --> 0:14:27.240
<v Speaker 1>Bay Rays. Uh. This is a guy that I've been

0:14:27.240 --> 0:14:29.480
<v Speaker 1>scouting since before the season. I mentioned his name, I

0:14:29.520 --> 0:14:31.600
<v Speaker 1>believe when we were doing the first base preview, I

0:14:31.680 --> 0:14:34.760
<v Speaker 1>was constantly telling you, guys off the air, the attention

0:14:34.800 --> 0:14:37.320
<v Speaker 1>to Nathaniel low Pay attention to Nathaniel Lowe. I like

0:14:37.400 --> 0:14:39.960
<v Speaker 1>what he did last year. He made huge strides, he

0:14:40.040 --> 0:14:43.040
<v Speaker 1>hit for batting average, he hit for power um in

0:14:43.640 --> 0:14:48.080
<v Speaker 1>triple A last season. This guy hit Uh, you know

0:14:48.080 --> 0:14:50.560
<v Speaker 1>what now I'm used using a mill dot com. I

0:14:50.560 --> 0:14:53.600
<v Speaker 1>don't like fangraphs from prospects. But he hit. He had

0:14:53.640 --> 0:14:56.560
<v Speaker 1>twenty seven home runs last year, UM and he was

0:14:56.600 --> 0:14:58.320
<v Speaker 1>clearly raking this year, so they're gonna give him an

0:14:58.320 --> 0:15:02.280
<v Speaker 1>opportunity to play. He's only twenty three years old. So

0:15:02.360 --> 0:15:07.600
<v Speaker 1>let's see last season overall, in he crossed three levels,

0:15:07.640 --> 0:15:10.160
<v Speaker 1>he hit three thirty seven home runs. That's what I thought.

0:15:10.200 --> 0:15:12.280
<v Speaker 1>It was three thirty and Triple A specifically he only

0:15:12.320 --> 0:15:14.560
<v Speaker 1>had to sixty, but that was twenty eight games. This year,

0:15:14.800 --> 0:15:17.480
<v Speaker 1>in twenty one games in Triple A he had three

0:15:17.600 --> 0:15:21.960
<v Speaker 1>hundred with three homers. So nice little blend of hit.

0:15:22.000 --> 0:15:24.280
<v Speaker 1>Tool can hit for batting average, offers a little bit

0:15:24.280 --> 0:15:27.800
<v Speaker 1>of pop as well. He's obviously gonna hitting good ballparks

0:15:27.840 --> 0:15:31.160
<v Speaker 1>playing in the American League East. I like Nate low

0:15:31.200 --> 0:15:35.200
<v Speaker 1>Greg He's he's probably the next one up after Alex Verdugo.

0:15:35.320 --> 0:15:38.000
<v Speaker 1>If we're just talking about young players who have upside.

0:15:38.640 --> 0:15:40.640
<v Speaker 1>Everyone else who's kind of on the waiver wider this week,

0:15:40.640 --> 0:15:43.200
<v Speaker 1>they're kind of like retreads. It's like guys you pick up,

0:15:43.280 --> 0:15:46.240
<v Speaker 1>guys you drop all the time. But I think outside

0:15:46.280 --> 0:15:48.360
<v Speaker 1>of Verdugo, Nate Low is probably the next hitter that

0:15:48.400 --> 0:15:50.880
<v Speaker 1>has the most staying power. How much we talked about

0:15:51.040 --> 0:15:55.960
<v Speaker 1>Nila Mm hmmm, say like seven eight percent? Yeah, I

0:15:56.080 --> 0:15:58.000
<v Speaker 1>was thinking the same thing. I was thinking the same

0:15:58.040 --> 0:16:01.000
<v Speaker 1>thing about seven eight or so. Is what I'm doing

0:16:01.040 --> 0:16:04.680
<v Speaker 1>for Nate Low? Nothing significant or super significant. I should

0:16:04.800 --> 0:16:07.960
<v Speaker 1>say I was going over the players to drop a

0:16:08.000 --> 0:16:13.720
<v Speaker 1>moment ago Frank. Same questions kind of abound, Right would

0:16:13.720 --> 0:16:18.560
<v Speaker 1>you drop J Bruce form? Um? Yeah, I think I

0:16:18.600 --> 0:16:22.320
<v Speaker 1>would Bruce like just empty power right now? The Seattle

0:16:22.360 --> 0:16:27.840
<v Speaker 1>Mariner's lineup overall is getting cold. Um, he's striking out

0:16:27.760 --> 0:16:32.440
<v Speaker 1>of a ton. He gives your power, But I'd rather

0:16:32.440 --> 0:16:35.800
<v Speaker 1>take a shot on the unknown the upside of Nate

0:16:35.840 --> 0:16:38.240
<v Speaker 1>Low instead. Okay, what about some of the other guys

0:16:38.360 --> 0:16:42.760
<v Speaker 1>that I named Your boy Malex Smith's very different obviously, Um,

0:16:42.880 --> 0:16:45.840
<v Speaker 1>I said J Bruce before. Did you drop Jerrickson profar

0:16:46.000 --> 0:16:54.000
<v Speaker 1>for him? Mm hmm. It's a good one. Um, I

0:16:55.520 --> 0:16:59.280
<v Speaker 1>don't think I would. That's a closer one. You're just

0:16:59.280 --> 0:17:03.040
<v Speaker 1>having me. Guys. It wasn't even really asserted profile guy

0:17:03.120 --> 0:17:06.480
<v Speaker 1>coming into the season, and he became one. I don't

0:17:06.480 --> 0:17:08.320
<v Speaker 1>think I would do that. Let's talk about some pictures

0:17:08.320 --> 0:17:09.880
<v Speaker 1>to pick up. There's not much out there this week,

0:17:10.160 --> 0:17:12.600
<v Speaker 1>and of course next hour to us we're giving away

0:17:12.600 --> 0:17:16.000
<v Speaker 1>Yankee tickets if you could beat Frank Slick around more

0:17:16.119 --> 0:17:23.880
<v Speaker 1>all the way after this, Daily rodo dot Com learned

0:17:23.920 --> 0:17:27.320
<v Speaker 1>from the game's best DFS players. We don't just give

0:17:27.359 --> 0:17:32.440
<v Speaker 1>you advice. We play every day, all major sports, all

0:17:32.520 --> 0:17:36.600
<v Speaker 1>year round. We never stopped industry leading DFS tools and

0:17:36.640 --> 0:17:41.040
<v Speaker 1>custom projections, and now the Daily roado dot Com optimizer

0:17:41.320 --> 0:17:44.159
<v Speaker 1>in minutes build an optimized line up for cash games

0:17:44.240 --> 0:17:48.440
<v Speaker 1>and tourneys. Learn from the game's best DFS players joined

0:17:48.560 --> 0:17:53.440
<v Speaker 1>Daily roado dot com. The following ad contains shocking material.

0:17:53.680 --> 0:17:58.000
<v Speaker 1>Listener discretion is advised. Is someone in your family playing

0:17:58.040 --> 0:18:01.840
<v Speaker 1>a dangerous game of Russian Roulette? Over forty three thousand

0:18:01.840 --> 0:18:04.720
<v Speaker 1>people die a year from drug overdose. A hundred and

0:18:04.760 --> 0:18:08.919
<v Speaker 1>twenty people a day, five people every hour, one person

0:18:09.160 --> 0:18:13.880
<v Speaker 1>every twelve minutes. Eighty eight thousand people die every year

0:18:13.960 --> 0:18:17.880
<v Speaker 1>from alcohol abuse. Over two hundred and forty people a day,

0:18:17.920 --> 0:18:22.359
<v Speaker 1>ten an hour, one person every six minutes. Somebody you know,

0:18:22.720 --> 0:18:26.000
<v Speaker 1>maybe next learn how to help someone you love get

0:18:26.000 --> 0:18:30.000
<v Speaker 1>away from the drugs, alcohol, and bad influences with the

0:18:30.119 --> 0:18:32.240
<v Speaker 1>f m l A people can take a leave of

0:18:32.280 --> 0:18:35.320
<v Speaker 1>absence from their job and still keep it. Call now

0:18:35.480 --> 0:18:38.919
<v Speaker 1>and learn how we can help you. Eight six six

0:18:39.280 --> 0:18:43.480
<v Speaker 1>four eight four nine six two one eight six six

0:18:43.760 --> 0:18:47.359
<v Speaker 1>four eight four nine six to one. That's eight six

0:18:47.440 --> 0:18:52.240
<v Speaker 1>six four eight four ninety six one Fantasy Sports today.

0:18:52.280 --> 0:18:55.400
<v Speaker 1>And you don't look wife beaters or people that are

0:18:55.440 --> 0:18:58.480
<v Speaker 1>putting child children in harms way. You don't want them

0:18:58.560 --> 0:19:01.800
<v Speaker 1>running around the football fee old when people know something

0:19:01.840 --> 0:19:03.720
<v Speaker 1>may have happened. But at the same time, what do

0:19:03.800 --> 0:19:05.800
<v Speaker 1>you do You have to You can suspend them for

0:19:05.840 --> 0:19:08.000
<v Speaker 1>a certain period of time, but you know it counts

0:19:08.040 --> 0:19:11.120
<v Speaker 1>to Ruben Foster and Kareem Hunt and now Tyreek Hill.

0:19:11.400 --> 0:19:13.600
<v Speaker 1>If the if the legal system isn't gonna do anything

0:19:13.640 --> 0:19:15.199
<v Speaker 1>about it, what is the NFL is supposed to do?

0:19:15.440 --> 0:19:18.639
<v Speaker 1>Saturday's eight am Eastern on the Fantasy Sports networking on

0:19:18.720 --> 0:19:45.760
<v Speaker 1>your popular podcast providers to vibrat Empire. All right, Phil, whoa, whoa, whoa.

0:19:45.880 --> 0:19:48.040
<v Speaker 1>We did the extra one there because we started it late.

0:19:48.760 --> 0:19:50.440
<v Speaker 1>It's like, give us the extra way out of that,

0:19:51.240 --> 0:19:52.960
<v Speaker 1>fair enough. And the way it was him, it was

0:19:53.000 --> 0:19:55.360
<v Speaker 1>like him and midway through it was a midway way,

0:19:56.160 --> 0:19:59.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, you had to put the headphones on quickly.

0:19:59.200 --> 0:20:01.639
<v Speaker 1>See what's going on? Are Greggy? Yeah? Happy Friday to you.

0:20:04.080 --> 0:20:05.760
<v Speaker 1>What do you want yet going on this weekend? What

0:20:05.880 --> 0:20:10.080
<v Speaker 1>do I have going on this weekend? Uh? Tomorrow I

0:20:10.200 --> 0:20:13.120
<v Speaker 1>have to go to a buddy's birthday party, and then

0:20:13.440 --> 0:20:18.320
<v Speaker 1>Sunday I'm seeing Avengers a nice school and obviously Game

0:20:18.359 --> 0:20:20.800
<v Speaker 1>of Thrones too, so very nice. Yeah, pretty nice weekend plan.

0:20:20.880 --> 0:20:23.720
<v Speaker 1>How about you? I got my buddies daughter's first birthday

0:20:23.760 --> 0:20:27.200
<v Speaker 1>party tomorrow, So what does what do you do it

0:20:27.320 --> 0:20:31.040
<v Speaker 1>of one year old birthday? So they rented out as

0:20:31.080 --> 0:20:33.000
<v Speaker 1>a room in like an Italian spot and they bought

0:20:33.080 --> 0:20:37.560
<v Speaker 1>us all this food. Pretty puns about it. That's awesome. Yeah,

0:20:37.600 --> 0:20:41.280
<v Speaker 1>it's great, It's amazing. Uh. And then Sunday going out

0:20:41.280 --> 0:20:43.880
<v Speaker 1>to my dad's uh for gonna buyo. So we bought

0:20:43.920 --> 0:20:45.760
<v Speaker 1>all his like tacos and stuff. We're gonna eat and

0:20:45.840 --> 0:20:50.119
<v Speaker 1>drink more. Wow. Rough weekend plan for Greggy. Yeah, this

0:20:50.200 --> 0:20:52.080
<v Speaker 1>guy's gonna come in Monday looking like the Walking Dead.

0:20:52.160 --> 0:20:55.320
<v Speaker 1>So the issue was shouldn't? Yeah's just too much drinking

0:20:56.400 --> 0:20:59.159
<v Speaker 1>Sequila coronas and Greggy loves it tequila too. I do.

0:20:59.440 --> 0:21:01.000
<v Speaker 1>And it was my dad, Like, the thing is with

0:21:01.119 --> 0:21:02.800
<v Speaker 1>my dad. When you walk in there, he will just

0:21:02.880 --> 0:21:06.159
<v Speaker 1>have shot Sekila lined up for you. What does your

0:21:06.240 --> 0:21:10.040
<v Speaker 1>dad live again? Highlands like lives near a beach, owns

0:21:10.040 --> 0:21:15.080
<v Speaker 1>a beach? Beach? Rob Sussman, He owns a beach, not

0:21:15.240 --> 0:21:17.760
<v Speaker 1>own a beach. Well Man, you didn't? Well when? When?

0:21:17.960 --> 0:21:19.560
<v Speaker 1>When am I making it out to Rob Sussen? When

0:21:19.600 --> 0:21:21.640
<v Speaker 1>you want to? When you want to? I want shot

0:21:21.680 --> 0:21:25.000
<v Speaker 1>to Sequila with Rob Sussman. You know I like tequila?

0:21:25.080 --> 0:21:27.920
<v Speaker 1>Come on, sometimes you like to kill it most of

0:21:27.960 --> 0:21:30.200
<v Speaker 1>the time I do. Have you ever met a time

0:21:30.240 --> 0:21:33.800
<v Speaker 1>when I didn't like if you asked me, Hey, Frank,

0:21:33.840 --> 0:21:35.320
<v Speaker 1>do you want a tequila shot? Have I ever turned

0:21:35.359 --> 0:21:38.119
<v Speaker 1>you down? Wasn't Floria that doesn't like toe kuilla that much?

0:21:38.160 --> 0:21:39.760
<v Speaker 1>They made drink at Christmas party? I thought that was you.

0:21:39.840 --> 0:21:41.800
<v Speaker 1>I was making a drink. No, it wasn't. It was

0:21:41.840 --> 0:21:48.119
<v Speaker 1>not me. Okay, no issues here, Greg cool anyway? Uh?

0:21:48.680 --> 0:21:51.640
<v Speaker 1>Hitting wise? Is there anybody else? Is there anybody else

0:21:51.720 --> 0:21:54.080
<v Speaker 1>out there they were supposed to pick up before we

0:21:54.119 --> 0:21:56.000
<v Speaker 1>move on to pictures? Yeah, I'm looking at some of

0:21:56.040 --> 0:21:59.920
<v Speaker 1>the most added hitters right now on who um they

0:22:00.000 --> 0:22:03.800
<v Speaker 1>any Santana If he was dropped. I could see picking

0:22:03.880 --> 0:22:06.119
<v Speaker 1>him back up, but I still do have concerns long term.

0:22:06.160 --> 0:22:07.680
<v Speaker 1>Sure you want to ride him always hot, that's fine.

0:22:07.680 --> 0:22:11.080
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't drop anybody of serious value for Danny Santana.

0:22:11.600 --> 0:22:16.000
<v Speaker 1>The most added hitter on Yahoo right now is your

0:22:16.119 --> 0:22:21.720
<v Speaker 1>Don Alvarez of the Houston Astros. He's been added in

0:22:21.920 --> 0:22:27.000
<v Speaker 1>eight thousand leagues. Yeah, guys, I understand he's crushing it

0:22:27.160 --> 0:22:30.880
<v Speaker 1>right now in the minors, but where is he gonna play?

0:22:32.640 --> 0:22:36.120
<v Speaker 1>That seems to be the biggest question and problem right now. Yeah,

0:22:36.119 --> 0:22:37.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean that was that was a huge issue for

0:22:37.800 --> 0:22:39.879
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Tucker too, that we had coming into the year.

0:22:40.240 --> 0:22:45.040
<v Speaker 1>To be fair, You're Don Alvarez has severely outperformed Kyle

0:22:45.080 --> 0:22:47.399
<v Speaker 1>Tucker to start the season. I mean, this guy is

0:22:47.520 --> 0:22:51.720
<v Speaker 1>is absolutely raking Greg. He's hitting four oh two. I

0:22:51.800 --> 0:22:55.720
<v Speaker 1>mean these numbers are as he's sitting four oh two

0:22:57.160 --> 0:22:59.879
<v Speaker 1>slugging percentage. He's got a fourteen one o p s,

0:23:00.359 --> 0:23:05.840
<v Speaker 1>twelve homers, thirties, six ribbies. If you have a bench spot,

0:23:05.920 --> 0:23:09.520
<v Speaker 1>are you stashing this guy right now? Probably, especially like

0:23:09.640 --> 0:23:11.600
<v Speaker 1>as you see some of the other top prospects go up.

0:23:12.040 --> 0:23:16.440
<v Speaker 1>Glad send Zel, he Boom Albert certainly SEUs me that

0:23:16.520 --> 0:23:19.600
<v Speaker 1>next guy, right. So I actually wrote on my Patreon

0:23:19.720 --> 0:23:23.280
<v Speaker 1>last night about the next wave of prospects that's coming

0:23:23.320 --> 0:23:26.320
<v Speaker 1>that I to be up in the major sooner rather

0:23:26.400 --> 0:23:28.480
<v Speaker 1>than later. I did not include your Don Alvarez just

0:23:28.520 --> 0:23:32.679
<v Speaker 1>because I don't know where he's gonna play unless they

0:23:32.720 --> 0:23:33.920
<v Speaker 1>just call him up and let him be the d

0:23:34.119 --> 0:23:36.600
<v Speaker 1>H every day, because they've kind of mixed and match.

0:23:36.640 --> 0:23:38.879
<v Speaker 1>They've used like Tyler White, They've used Tony Camp here

0:23:38.920 --> 0:23:41.159
<v Speaker 1>and there. They'll put Jake Murisnick in the outfield, and

0:23:41.160 --> 0:23:44.640
<v Speaker 1>they move Josh Reddick to d H. So I guess

0:23:44.720 --> 0:23:46.760
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of a revolving door right now, they could

0:23:46.760 --> 0:23:50.760
<v Speaker 1>put your Don Alvarez as the designated hitter. I mean

0:23:50.880 --> 0:23:54.120
<v Speaker 1>maybe that's maybe that's a spot where it works great.

0:23:54.320 --> 0:23:56.439
<v Speaker 1>Like I don't think Josh Reddick is going anywhere yet.

0:23:56.480 --> 0:23:59.159
<v Speaker 1>I think as long as he's performing well, which he

0:23:59.200 --> 0:24:00.840
<v Speaker 1>is right now. He's hitting a were three hundred, well

0:24:00.880 --> 0:24:03.639
<v Speaker 1>over three hundred, um, I don't think they're gonna take

0:24:03.680 --> 0:24:04.959
<v Speaker 1>him out of the lineup. Can you see your Don

0:24:05.040 --> 0:24:07.360
<v Speaker 1>Alvarez coming in and just playing d H every day?

0:24:07.840 --> 0:24:10.240
<v Speaker 1>For it? Seem greggy No, I don't think so. I

0:24:10.240 --> 0:24:11.720
<v Speaker 1>don't don't think we're at that point with your donna.

0:24:11.880 --> 0:24:15.000
<v Speaker 1>How is he as a fielder, I couldn't tell you,

0:24:15.960 --> 0:24:17.359
<v Speaker 1>so I don't. I don't think they're gonna call up

0:24:17.359 --> 0:24:18.960
<v Speaker 1>a guy. What does it matter? Like if they have

0:24:19.080 --> 0:24:21.080
<v Speaker 1>the d H available, then they'll just make him a

0:24:21.160 --> 0:24:27.040
<v Speaker 1>d H. Yeah. Fielding has has rated a forty five

0:24:27.040 --> 0:24:29.119
<v Speaker 1>out of eighty according to MLB dot com pretty bad,

0:24:29.960 --> 0:24:34.560
<v Speaker 1>not great, pretty bad. Um fourteen walks in nineteen strikeouts.

0:24:34.600 --> 0:24:37.119
<v Speaker 1>He's absolutely mashing. I can't deny that, but I just

0:24:38.160 --> 0:24:40.560
<v Speaker 1>I do I do have concerns about where would he play.

0:24:40.800 --> 0:24:45.080
<v Speaker 1>It's a really good lineup obviously with Houston. Um, I

0:24:45.119 --> 0:24:48.560
<v Speaker 1>mean you could stash him. I just I don't know

0:24:48.600 --> 0:24:51.439
<v Speaker 1>when he's gonna be up just because the prospect is mashing, Greg,

0:24:51.520 --> 0:24:52.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we've seen the sport. Just because the guy

0:24:53.000 --> 0:24:55.760
<v Speaker 1>is hitting well, he doesn't always get called up. If

0:24:55.800 --> 0:24:57.280
<v Speaker 1>that was the case, last should have been called hip

0:24:57.320 --> 0:25:01.159
<v Speaker 1>last year didn't happen. So he's the most He's in

0:25:01.280 --> 0:25:03.360
<v Speaker 1>number one and by far he's number one added player

0:25:03.400 --> 0:25:06.040
<v Speaker 1>on Yahoo. What was he ranked prospect wise coming into there?

0:25:07.280 --> 0:25:10.320
<v Speaker 1>He is the third ranked prospect in the Houston Ashrolls organization.

0:25:10.720 --> 0:25:13.120
<v Speaker 1>Oh all right, where is he? Like Baseball Like America.

0:25:14.040 --> 0:25:15.800
<v Speaker 1>Uh well, that's according to MLB dot Com. I don't.

0:25:15.800 --> 0:25:17.719
<v Speaker 1>I don't have Baseball America in front of me right now.

0:25:17.720 --> 0:25:20.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't even know if he's the top one prospect overall. Yeah,

0:25:21.640 --> 0:25:25.440
<v Speaker 1>pretty legit. Who would you rather own? You're an Alvarez

0:25:25.640 --> 0:25:29.080
<v Speaker 1>or Mitch Keller. Mitch Keller on your list? I like

0:25:29.280 --> 0:25:31.879
<v Speaker 1>Mitch Keller. I was gonna write about him last night,

0:25:31.960 --> 0:25:34.080
<v Speaker 1>but overall, I don't. I don't think he's that close.

0:25:34.119 --> 0:25:35.879
<v Speaker 1>He might be more of a second half of the

0:25:35.960 --> 0:25:37.600
<v Speaker 1>season call up because he still has a lot of

0:25:37.680 --> 0:25:40.439
<v Speaker 1>issues with walks, which is something that I was reminded

0:25:40.480 --> 0:25:42.119
<v Speaker 1>of last night when I was looking through his game log.

0:25:42.280 --> 0:25:44.440
<v Speaker 1>So he struggles to walk. Per nine is a little

0:25:44.440 --> 0:25:46.240
<v Speaker 1>bit high. The cape for nine is also very good.

0:25:46.320 --> 0:25:48.679
<v Speaker 1>He has legit swinging miss stuff, and I think he's

0:25:48.680 --> 0:25:50.520
<v Speaker 1>gonna be a good picture. But I think they're gonna

0:25:50.560 --> 0:25:52.320
<v Speaker 1>leave him down in the minors greg until he starts

0:25:52.359 --> 0:25:57.040
<v Speaker 1>to improve this lack of control that we've seen in

0:25:57.119 --> 0:25:58.440
<v Speaker 1>the minor leagues. I mean, that's why you're in the

0:25:58.480 --> 0:26:01.080
<v Speaker 1>minors to try and find tool your craft, and I

0:26:01.160 --> 0:26:02.520
<v Speaker 1>just don't think he's there yet, so I think he's

0:26:02.520 --> 0:26:04.040
<v Speaker 1>more of a second half of the season call up.

0:26:04.040 --> 0:26:07.000
<v Speaker 1>That's why I did not include him in my Atreon

0:26:08.200 --> 0:26:11.800
<v Speaker 1>article last night. So I would I would always stash

0:26:11.840 --> 0:26:16.600
<v Speaker 1>her down Albarets ahead of him. Okay, by one last question,

0:26:16.680 --> 0:26:18.679
<v Speaker 1>we have a minor league spot, Yes, for sure pick him.

0:26:19.520 --> 0:26:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Question understand right, should you own your Don Alvarez over

0:26:27.680 --> 0:26:31.720
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Tucker like we do that exact dilemma. We don't

0:26:31.840 --> 0:26:34.720
<v Speaker 1>know that Alvarez will be up before soccer. We do

0:26:34.880 --> 0:26:37.840
<v Speaker 1>not know that he'll get the shot before will. I

0:26:37.960 --> 0:26:40.840
<v Speaker 1>think based on the way he's playing, Greg, you can't

0:26:40.920 --> 0:26:43.959
<v Speaker 1>just go based on prospect pedigree here because Kyle Tucker

0:26:44.880 --> 0:26:48.880
<v Speaker 1>is not getting it done. He's got six homers, he's

0:26:48.880 --> 0:26:54.480
<v Speaker 1>got five steals. That's all great, but he's matings. To me,

0:26:55.080 --> 0:26:57.399
<v Speaker 1>it would be a travesty if they had an injury

0:26:57.400 --> 0:26:58.800
<v Speaker 1>and they needed to call up a hitter, if they

0:26:58.840 --> 0:27:01.159
<v Speaker 1>called up Kyle Tucker over your Don Alvarez. I just

0:27:01.240 --> 0:27:03.400
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't agree with that move personally. It doesn't matter

0:27:03.400 --> 0:27:06.680
<v Speaker 1>if you agree with it. I think that if anything

0:27:06.720 --> 0:27:08.320
<v Speaker 1>were to happen, you're don Alvarez is getting called it

0:27:08.359 --> 0:27:10.760
<v Speaker 1>before the way that he's performing. So if you're saying that,

0:27:10.880 --> 0:27:13.560
<v Speaker 1>then your answer is clear that you should own Alvarez

0:27:13.600 --> 0:27:17.159
<v Speaker 1>over Kyle Tucker. I believe has more long term ups.

0:27:17.200 --> 0:27:21.680
<v Speaker 1>I said, though, Okay, he's had this top prospect status

0:27:21.760 --> 0:27:23.640
<v Speaker 1>for years. We should we know what the power speed

0:27:23.720 --> 0:27:29.560
<v Speaker 1>combination is and he's not gonna steal bases Preston Tucker?

0:27:29.640 --> 0:27:32.399
<v Speaker 1>Is that actually his brother? So I'm stashing Kyle Tucker

0:27:32.480 --> 0:27:34.480
<v Speaker 1>and two of my home leagues where we have minor

0:27:34.560 --> 0:27:38.520
<v Speaker 1>league spots, Greg, Should I be stashing your Don Alvarez

0:27:38.600 --> 0:27:41.720
<v Speaker 1>over him? Probably? This is a keeper league, So that's

0:27:41.800 --> 0:27:44.840
<v Speaker 1>I have an eye on the future too. So that's

0:27:44.880 --> 0:27:50.280
<v Speaker 1>why right now at least, I'm choosing to stash Kyle Tucker.

0:27:50.920 --> 0:27:53.480
<v Speaker 1>So when one league have Kyle Tucker and he's Luzardo

0:27:53.920 --> 0:27:56.280
<v Speaker 1>as my two minor leaguers in my two home leagues,

0:27:56.480 --> 0:27:57.800
<v Speaker 1>you're both a lot. You're a lot of status two

0:27:57.800 --> 0:27:59.880
<v Speaker 1>minor leaguers, and then the other one I have Kyle

0:28:00.000 --> 0:28:06.040
<v Speaker 1>Tucker and Bobichette. Should I be stashing your Don over

0:28:06.160 --> 0:28:09.560
<v Speaker 1>is over Bobichette probably broke his hand? Is that is that? Keep? Really? Yeah?

0:28:09.600 --> 0:28:12.720
<v Speaker 1>They're both keeper. So that's why I have like an

0:28:12.760 --> 0:28:14.879
<v Speaker 1>eye on the future. If you're just playing for this

0:28:15.119 --> 0:28:17.000
<v Speaker 1>year and you want a prospect to stash, it might

0:28:17.040 --> 0:28:19.520
<v Speaker 1>be even to help you this year and you're done.

0:28:19.560 --> 0:28:21.040
<v Speaker 1>Overs is probably at the top of the list, And

0:28:21.200 --> 0:28:22.920
<v Speaker 1>I'll let you in a little sneak peek behind the

0:28:22.920 --> 0:28:26.119
<v Speaker 1>pay paywall. Greg. The prospect that I said I think

0:28:26.160 --> 0:28:30.040
<v Speaker 1>gets the call next is Ryan mount Castle of the

0:28:30.160 --> 0:28:33.359
<v Speaker 1>Baltimore Orioles, who does have good bats to ball skills

0:28:33.400 --> 0:28:35.240
<v Speaker 1>and he's added power over the past couple of years.

0:28:35.280 --> 0:28:36.880
<v Speaker 1>He has an eighteen home run season in the minor

0:28:36.960 --> 0:28:39.760
<v Speaker 1>leagues under his belt. He's sitting right around three hundred

0:28:39.840 --> 0:28:42.160
<v Speaker 1>so far this season, and the Baltimore Orioles clearly have

0:28:42.200 --> 0:28:44.520
<v Speaker 1>an eye on the future, which might be the end

0:28:44.600 --> 0:28:47.959
<v Speaker 1>of Chris Davis unfortunately. But I think I do think

0:28:48.080 --> 0:28:50.520
<v Speaker 1>Ryan mount Castle is the next prospect to get called up. Okay,

0:28:50.680 --> 0:28:53.360
<v Speaker 1>Ryan mount Castle the next big prospect to get called up.

0:28:53.640 --> 0:28:57.200
<v Speaker 1>According to our own Frankie Stamfle what um fifteen team

0:28:57.280 --> 0:28:59.920
<v Speaker 1>leagues hit or wise, there's one more than twelve teams

0:29:00.040 --> 0:29:02.400
<v Speaker 1>you get catcher. James McCann is a catcher that's probably

0:29:02.400 --> 0:29:04.600
<v Speaker 1>the best out there right now for you ll owned

0:29:04.600 --> 0:29:06.760
<v Speaker 1>about swel percent of Yahoo leagues. And it's funny. Uh,

0:29:06.800 --> 0:29:08.520
<v Speaker 1>Frank was working on the fifteen team, guys. I was

0:29:08.520 --> 0:29:10.240
<v Speaker 1>working on the twelve team. Guys. We both put James

0:29:10.320 --> 0:29:13.840
<v Speaker 1>McCann in here, and I think he's available in either

0:29:13.960 --> 0:29:16.880
<v Speaker 1>the main event or my great Fantasy Baseball invitation. I

0:29:16.960 --> 0:29:18.600
<v Speaker 1>was looking at a catch him. I was looking at

0:29:18.600 --> 0:29:20.080
<v Speaker 1>a catch in our work league. And I think that

0:29:20.160 --> 0:29:22.840
<v Speaker 1>Tony walters ahead of him. I don't know, Colorado. That

0:29:22.880 --> 0:29:24.440
<v Speaker 1>doesn't seem like a good idea, but I thought it

0:29:24.440 --> 0:29:27.800
<v Speaker 1>was Colorado, Like why not? You know? Anyway, it's we

0:29:27.920 --> 0:29:30.200
<v Speaker 1>did not afore see James mccannn basically just coming in

0:29:30.280 --> 0:29:34.560
<v Speaker 1>here and completely stealing. Yeah, and and he has. He's

0:29:34.560 --> 0:29:38.080
<v Speaker 1>batting really, really well right now. He's earlier this year

0:29:38.200 --> 0:29:40.800
<v Speaker 1>starts than he was splitting time with Williams in gestio.

0:29:40.880 --> 0:29:43.240
<v Speaker 1>And now you're right, Frank, he's starting more often than not.

0:29:43.600 --> 0:29:46.800
<v Speaker 1>He's played like the last six games for this White

0:29:46.840 --> 0:29:50.640
<v Speaker 1>Sox team. Um d aging some, but he's playing every day,

0:29:51.080 --> 0:29:53.000
<v Speaker 1>and you want to catch it that's performing and playing

0:29:53.040 --> 0:29:55.760
<v Speaker 1>every day right now. That Cherry's McCann and he's available everywhere.

0:29:55.960 --> 0:29:58.280
<v Speaker 1>So my question to you, Frank is would you drop

0:29:58.320 --> 0:30:01.600
<v Speaker 1>Beef Casti over James McCann. Yeah, definitely I would. I'm

0:30:01.600 --> 0:30:03.440
<v Speaker 1>just looking at the batleballs data right now for James

0:30:03.520 --> 0:30:06.280
<v Speaker 1>mccainn he's absolutely mashing. Not something that you can normally

0:30:06.360 --> 0:30:09.080
<v Speaker 1>say about a catcher let alone. You know, James McCain

0:30:09.200 --> 0:30:11.200
<v Speaker 1>is probably a second catcher in most leagues where you

0:30:11.240 --> 0:30:13.400
<v Speaker 1>start two of him. He's got a forty one point

0:30:13.440 --> 0:30:17.240
<v Speaker 1>seven percent hard hit rate percent line driver you guys

0:30:17.560 --> 0:30:22.520
<v Speaker 1>like league average line drive rate is he's five percentage

0:30:22.520 --> 0:30:24.640
<v Speaker 1>points over that. So he's absolutely mashing. He puts the

0:30:24.680 --> 0:30:27.760
<v Speaker 1>ball in the air percent of the time, walking more

0:30:27.880 --> 0:30:31.400
<v Speaker 1>this ease here, hitting three sixty five s. He had

0:30:31.400 --> 0:30:33.960
<v Speaker 1>a home run off David Price last night. Absolutely, Greg,

0:30:34.080 --> 0:30:36.080
<v Speaker 1>this guy should be owning all two catcher leagues, okay,

0:30:36.320 --> 0:30:38.640
<v Speaker 1>James McCanns, maybe even one catcher leagues. If you were

0:30:38.720 --> 0:30:40.720
<v Speaker 1>rolling with a guy like Wellington Casto, yeah I would

0:30:40.720 --> 0:30:43.240
<v Speaker 1>make that move. Or if you were rolling Williams studio,

0:30:43.400 --> 0:30:46.160
<v Speaker 1>who is hurt, has the hamstring injury, need a replacement

0:30:46.240 --> 0:30:49.240
<v Speaker 1>for him. That's why I picked Tony Walters. James mccainn

0:30:49.320 --> 0:30:53.280
<v Speaker 1>only fifteen percent owned right now, you should I would

0:30:53.320 --> 0:30:56.320
<v Speaker 1>rather own James mccannon than Tony. It's crazy because there's

0:30:56.320 --> 0:30:58.920
<v Speaker 1>deciding between the two of them. We should ask me Greg, Well,

0:30:58.960 --> 0:31:02.880
<v Speaker 1>I didn't, and this is how you end up doing

0:31:02.960 --> 0:31:06.280
<v Speaker 1>the things that you do. Greg, I don't know to

0:31:06.320 --> 0:31:10.160
<v Speaker 1>tell you. I think my last pickup now whatever you

0:31:10.240 --> 0:31:12.240
<v Speaker 1>did this last time and then we got Carter keep

0:31:12.280 --> 0:31:14.000
<v Speaker 1>them called up and you're like, no, I used all

0:31:14.040 --> 0:31:19.760
<v Speaker 1>my pickups to do it. Welcome to the squad, Jim

0:31:19.840 --> 0:31:23.520
<v Speaker 1>mccann'let Jim mccannon. That's not Jim McCann. Oh, I don't

0:31:23.520 --> 0:31:24.800
<v Speaker 1>know if I want to do this. I was gonna

0:31:24.880 --> 0:31:26.320
<v Speaker 1>drop a start and he starting on Sunday A. Right

0:31:26.320 --> 0:31:28.360
<v Speaker 1>while you're doing that, I'm gonna remind anyone who's listening

0:31:28.440 --> 0:31:30.160
<v Speaker 1>or watching right now if you want to get in

0:31:30.320 --> 0:31:34.240
<v Speaker 1>the DFS contest tonight. One of these times, we're gonna

0:31:34.320 --> 0:31:37.760
<v Speaker 1>fill up enough spots for this contest to run play

0:31:37.800 --> 0:31:42.560
<v Speaker 1>every week. Well, well, last week the culprits were Venturum

0:31:43.240 --> 0:31:46.280
<v Speaker 1>and Steve not surprising, they didn't set their lineups. If

0:31:46.320 --> 0:31:47.920
<v Speaker 1>they would have, it would have ran for money. Those

0:31:47.960 --> 0:31:49.240
<v Speaker 1>were the two that we were missing. How do we

0:31:49.320 --> 0:31:51.200
<v Speaker 1>do last How do I do last week? I don't know.

0:31:51.240 --> 0:31:53.240
<v Speaker 1>What's a good question? Actually, overall, if you want to play,

0:31:53.320 --> 0:31:55.080
<v Speaker 1>hit me up, send me your fan to user name

0:31:55.080 --> 0:31:57.200
<v Speaker 1>will get you in here. I tweeted out the link

0:31:57.280 --> 0:31:58.760
<v Speaker 1>last night too, so you can just click on that.

0:31:59.440 --> 0:32:02.480
<v Speaker 1>Have you been contests in the past, you're already in it.

0:32:02.760 --> 0:32:04.920
<v Speaker 1>Just go to the friends tab on FanDuel and set

0:32:04.960 --> 0:32:07.680
<v Speaker 1>your line up. Just two dollar entry, top three positions

0:32:07.920 --> 0:32:10.160
<v Speaker 1>play out. Please. We wanted to run for money like

0:32:10.280 --> 0:32:13.320
<v Speaker 1>him in fourth last week? What do I do? God?

0:32:13.360 --> 0:32:17.520
<v Speaker 1>You won? Did I again? Yeah? Not surprising. I'm I'm

0:32:17.560 --> 0:32:19.680
<v Speaker 1>on a hot treak. I one yesterday too. I know

0:32:19.760 --> 0:32:21.320
<v Speaker 1>a synderguard in my lineup? So what did you do

0:32:21.400 --> 0:32:26.280
<v Speaker 1>better than me? Everything? It's usual? It was Lind That

0:32:26.400 --> 0:32:28.440
<v Speaker 1>was really it, head Lind Door. I think you hit

0:32:28.440 --> 0:32:32.360
<v Speaker 1>two home runs last Friday night and I we do

0:32:32.440 --> 0:32:34.680
<v Speaker 1>have twenty members in here now, all right, So people

0:32:34.720 --> 0:32:37.200
<v Speaker 1>just have to set their line up. Set your lineup. People.

0:32:38.200 --> 0:32:40.120
<v Speaker 1>If there are people who are in this who do

0:32:40.200 --> 0:32:42.720
<v Speaker 1>not set their lineup by let's say four or five pm,

0:32:42.840 --> 0:32:47.600
<v Speaker 1>maybe again together tweeting the link back out, So let's

0:32:47.640 --> 0:32:50.520
<v Speaker 1>fill this up one of those. We're also and our

0:32:50.640 --> 0:32:52.520
<v Speaker 1>over two. We're giving away Yankee tickets, so be a

0:32:52.600 --> 0:32:54.760
<v Speaker 1>looking up for that Yankee tickets for tonight. Pretty good

0:32:54.760 --> 0:32:57.720
<v Speaker 1>seats too, right, really good seats, really good seats and

0:32:57.800 --> 0:33:00.000
<v Speaker 1>a great game. Well maybe not from the Twins perspective.

0:33:00.000 --> 0:33:02.000
<v Speaker 1>They have Kyle Gibson on the mound. What could be

0:33:02.160 --> 0:33:06.080
<v Speaker 1>very good if you're like me and Greg, that's us

0:33:06.120 --> 0:33:07.920
<v Speaker 1>stage Faxton on the mount tonight. Have we got an

0:33:08.000 --> 0:33:11.000
<v Speaker 1>update from Agil and I have not seen it yet.

0:33:11.160 --> 0:33:14.920
<v Speaker 1>Nothing yet. On who you're starting, I'm not gonna tell you.

0:33:15.040 --> 0:33:18.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm not gonna tell everybody. There are some There are

0:33:18.800 --> 0:33:20.960
<v Speaker 1>some interesting pictures though tonight. There's a lot of guys

0:33:21.000 --> 0:33:23.880
<v Speaker 1>that I like, you look trying to get if you

0:33:23.920 --> 0:33:25.600
<v Speaker 1>want to get any Rockies or d Backs in your

0:33:25.600 --> 0:33:29.880
<v Speaker 1>lineup tonight, Greg, Oh my gosh, like Nick Ahmed's thirty

0:33:30.480 --> 0:33:32.880
<v Speaker 1>dollars because they play in Colorado. Two starting pictures that

0:33:32.920 --> 0:33:37.440
<v Speaker 1>I like, serious trying to do this one. I'll tell

0:33:37.480 --> 0:33:40.280
<v Speaker 1>you one not to use Oay Tyler Anderson. I'm not

0:33:40.280 --> 0:33:42.880
<v Speaker 1>gonna use Tyler and not use Tyler Anderson tonight being

0:33:42.920 --> 0:33:45.040
<v Speaker 1>a pictures Frank, who's the must grow sneaky tonight. I

0:33:45.080 --> 0:33:47.200
<v Speaker 1>do like, who's the top picture on the board to

0:33:47.320 --> 0:33:51.680
<v Speaker 1>pick up of the waivers? Um. I guess it depends

0:33:51.760 --> 0:33:55.560
<v Speaker 1>what you need because there are two star picking good picture.

0:33:55.760 --> 0:33:58.400
<v Speaker 1>You need a good starting picture or reliever greg both

0:33:58.440 --> 0:34:02.520
<v Speaker 1>would be helpful. Okay, So the top starting pitcher that

0:34:02.880 --> 0:34:05.320
<v Speaker 1>I will give you that I think has legitimate staying

0:34:05.320 --> 0:34:07.880
<v Speaker 1>power for me at least is Martine Perez. I'm a

0:34:07.880 --> 0:34:10.480
<v Speaker 1>big fan of Martine Perez. We've talked about him this week.

0:34:10.840 --> 0:34:12.960
<v Speaker 1>He's gonna end up having two starts next week, two

0:34:13.120 --> 0:34:14.759
<v Speaker 1>very good matchups as well. I believe one of them

0:34:14.800 --> 0:34:16.800
<v Speaker 1>is the Tigers. The other one might be the Blue Jays.

0:34:17.200 --> 0:34:19.239
<v Speaker 1>Um and even with lad in the lineup, they haven't

0:34:19.239 --> 0:34:21.680
<v Speaker 1>been hitting well and they're prone to striking out a lot.

0:34:22.040 --> 0:34:24.000
<v Speaker 1>But Martine Perez did the other night against the Houston

0:34:24.040 --> 0:34:26.919
<v Speaker 1>Astros just really earned my respect. That was a great start.

0:34:26.960 --> 0:34:29.839
<v Speaker 1>He goes eight innings. I believe you had seven strikeouts.

0:34:30.400 --> 0:34:33.520
<v Speaker 1>The velocity is up this year about two miles per hour.

0:34:33.640 --> 0:34:38.560
<v Speaker 1>He's he's sitting where in the past he's been three,

0:34:39.000 --> 0:34:41.480
<v Speaker 1>and he's using a cutter more around thirty percent of

0:34:41.520 --> 0:34:44.759
<v Speaker 1>the time. So for me, Greg, it's Martine Perez. I

0:34:44.800 --> 0:34:47.839
<v Speaker 1>don't think there's anyone worth breaking the bank for really

0:34:47.920 --> 0:34:51.640
<v Speaker 1>this week, but if Martine Perez is out there fix

0:34:52.480 --> 0:34:54.400
<v Speaker 1>something like that, and to me the top reliever. A

0:34:54.480 --> 0:34:56.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of people have been asking the way, do I

0:34:56.360 --> 0:34:58.440
<v Speaker 1>pick up robots? Do I pick up Kelly? Do I

0:34:58.480 --> 0:35:01.920
<v Speaker 1>pick up a Melio? Pagans me it is Handsel robleist

0:35:02.000 --> 0:35:04.080
<v Speaker 1>because and we spoke about this a lot yesterday. You

0:35:04.080 --> 0:35:06.680
<v Speaker 1>go back and listen to our interview with Brad Ziegler.

0:35:06.719 --> 0:35:08.000
<v Speaker 1>He kind of led us inside the mind of a

0:35:08.040 --> 0:35:10.640
<v Speaker 1>reliever and how things are going in both the Angels

0:35:10.719 --> 0:35:14.320
<v Speaker 1>and the Rangers bullpens. But I do think at some

0:35:14.480 --> 0:35:17.359
<v Speaker 1>point this hear Jose Laclerk will be the closer again

0:35:17.400 --> 0:35:21.000
<v Speaker 1>for the Rangers, whether or not it's because he's performing

0:35:21.040 --> 0:35:23.319
<v Speaker 1>well again and they just want him in that role,

0:35:23.480 --> 0:35:27.000
<v Speaker 1>or they trade away Shawn Kelly. With the Angels, they're

0:35:27.080 --> 0:35:31.640
<v Speaker 1>not tied down to using Cody Allen. The Rangers situation

0:35:31.800 --> 0:35:33.439
<v Speaker 1>is different. They have a young reliever and le clerk.

0:35:33.440 --> 0:35:35.960
<v Speaker 1>They gave him a contract extension. They are tied to

0:35:36.120 --> 0:35:39.520
<v Speaker 1>him somewhat for the future. The Angels are not Cody Allen.

0:35:39.600 --> 0:35:42.000
<v Speaker 1>One year deal. He hasn't performed well, he's hurt. I

0:35:42.080 --> 0:35:45.480
<v Speaker 1>think Handsel Roblist has staying power as the closer. How

0:35:45.600 --> 0:35:48.160
<v Speaker 1>great will he be in that closer role? I do

0:35:48.360 --> 0:35:50.160
<v Speaker 1>have my concerns. This is a guy who's giving up

0:35:50.160 --> 0:35:51.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot of walks, given up a lot of home

0:35:51.560 --> 0:35:55.719
<v Speaker 1>runs looking at you in the past. But they made

0:35:55.840 --> 0:35:58.080
<v Speaker 1>a entrance video for this guy for crying out loud

0:35:58.200 --> 0:36:00.399
<v Speaker 1>and awesome one at that with the Undertakers theme song.

0:36:00.520 --> 0:36:03.360
<v Speaker 1>So they seem to like him a decent amount. And

0:36:03.440 --> 0:36:05.799
<v Speaker 1>he has performed well so far this year. So if

0:36:05.800 --> 0:36:08.280
<v Speaker 1>I had to give you one reliever, who's the top reliever?

0:36:08.480 --> 0:36:11.120
<v Speaker 1>Pncil robost one starting pitcher for me, Greg, it's Martine Perez.

0:36:11.280 --> 0:36:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Al Right, how much you dropping on him? To six percent?

0:36:15.880 --> 0:36:17.200
<v Speaker 1>If you need a reliever, I would be a little

0:36:17.200 --> 0:36:20.600
<v Speaker 1>bit more aggressive. Would you rather own Robost or Tye Buttery?

0:36:21.480 --> 0:36:23.319
<v Speaker 1>I will stick with Robosts. I think what we've seen

0:36:23.440 --> 0:36:25.200
<v Speaker 1>is a pretty good indication. Last night they had a

0:36:25.239 --> 0:36:27.879
<v Speaker 1>four run lead. Ancil Robosts still came in the ninth ending.

0:36:28.120 --> 0:36:30.000
<v Speaker 1>Wasn't a safe situation, but they're using him in the

0:36:30.080 --> 0:36:34.840
<v Speaker 1>ninth inning for now already. Would you drop for Martine Perez?

0:36:34.880 --> 0:36:38.200
<v Speaker 1>Would you drop Aaron Sanchez after what happened last night?

0:36:40.280 --> 0:36:43.279
<v Speaker 1>I love Aaron Sanchez. Well, last night you probably didn't

0:36:43.320 --> 0:36:46.560
<v Speaker 1>love Aaron Sanchez, did you, Frank? I didn't have him

0:36:46.560 --> 0:36:48.320
<v Speaker 1>in any line up I did. It was poor, it

0:36:48.360 --> 0:36:51.440
<v Speaker 1>went poorly. I'm sorry. Um, yeah, I would do that.

0:36:51.520 --> 0:36:53.920
<v Speaker 1>I would make that move. The drop Zach would hurt

0:36:53.960 --> 0:37:05.200
<v Speaker 1>my heart the entire last Would you drop drop back

0:37:05.280 --> 0:37:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Brad Peacock for him? Yes, I don't know. That's close, man.

0:37:17.440 --> 0:37:23.520
<v Speaker 1>We're taking up regularly. Back after this, the Fantasy Sports

0:37:23.560 --> 0:37:25.879
<v Speaker 1>Network is ready to take you out to the ball game.

0:37:26.000 --> 0:37:28.440
<v Speaker 1>Our experts and analysts are following the Boys of Summer

0:37:28.520 --> 0:37:30.759
<v Speaker 1>through all one, d and sixty two games on the

0:37:30.840 --> 0:37:34.080
<v Speaker 1>two thousand nineteen MLB season with the best fantasy baseball

0:37:34.080 --> 0:37:36.680
<v Speaker 1>analysis in the industry. Catch the latest news and notes

0:37:36.760 --> 0:37:38.759
<v Speaker 1>every day to help you win your fantasy leagues and

0:37:39.080 --> 0:37:41.520
<v Speaker 1>your t A best tournaments will always want you back

0:37:41.760 --> 0:37:44.120
<v Speaker 1>listening and watching the Fantasy Sports Network on the f

0:37:44.160 --> 0:37:45.719
<v Speaker 1>F and T s Y Radio app and the f

0:37:45.800 --> 0:37:48.080
<v Speaker 1>F and T s Y YouTube channel. The Fantasy Sports

0:37:48.120 --> 0:37:51.600
<v Speaker 1>Network where we're root root rooting for your fantasy baseball

0:37:51.640 --> 0:37:55.680
<v Speaker 1>team Mori s Allen two thousand and fifteen, two thousand

0:37:55.719 --> 0:37:59.440
<v Speaker 1>and sixteen, European Long Drive Tour Champion two thousand seventeen,

0:38:00.000 --> 0:38:06.719
<v Speaker 1>World number one. For me personally, I keep my game

0:38:06.760 --> 0:38:12.160
<v Speaker 1>face on me all the time, especially coming out with

0:38:12.160 --> 0:38:15.920
<v Speaker 1>the bucker, leaving the range or even leaving the poorts.

0:38:17.560 --> 0:38:20.160
<v Speaker 1>What's your story? Go to game face grooming dot com

0:38:20.239 --> 0:38:22.760
<v Speaker 1>from all your athletic facial wipes and body cleansing needs

0:38:24.120 --> 0:38:27.399
<v Speaker 1>full time fantasy He has to be in your line

0:38:27.440 --> 0:38:29.440
<v Speaker 1>up almost every time he's on the mount. Maybe the

0:38:29.560 --> 0:38:32.440
<v Speaker 1>one time you don't his course field, But I think

0:38:32.480 --> 0:38:33.960
<v Speaker 1>it also depends on the time of the year and

0:38:34.440 --> 0:38:36.080
<v Speaker 1>uh if he has a two star week But re you,

0:38:36.200 --> 0:38:39.480
<v Speaker 1>it's been certainly very valuable, and again it's the way

0:38:39.560 --> 0:38:41.520
<v Speaker 1>the game has changed. You can't be worried if you're

0:38:41.560 --> 0:38:44.520
<v Speaker 1>only gonna get out of a picture. You just have

0:38:44.680 --> 0:38:47.800
<v Speaker 1>to manage your roster correctly. But these guys are valuable

0:38:47.880 --> 0:38:49.759
<v Speaker 1>week days to the four BM Easter and on the

0:38:49.800 --> 0:38:53.080
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Sports Network and on your popular podcast providers can't

0:38:53.080 --> 0:38:55.759
<v Speaker 1>get enough fantasy football. Road to Experts is launched their

0:38:55.920 --> 0:38:59.680
<v Speaker 1>NFL three Fantasy Football package, which includes the best math

0:38:59.760 --> 0:39:03.160
<v Speaker 1>Bay seasonal projections and rankings available anywhere on the Internet

0:39:03.200 --> 0:39:06.240
<v Speaker 1>and Davis Madigan The Roto Experts are providing Dynasty season

0:39:06.320 --> 0:39:09.520
<v Speaker 1>long betting, best ball, and NFL Draft content every day

0:39:09.560 --> 0:39:11.360
<v Speaker 1>of the year to give you an edge regardless of

0:39:11.440 --> 0:39:14.200
<v Speaker 1>what type of fantasy football you play. Say temper cent

0:39:14.239 --> 0:39:16.560
<v Speaker 1>at roto Experts dot Com with the promo code Evan

0:39:16.640 --> 0:39:19.880
<v Speaker 1>T s Y. It's the NFL three five Fantasy football

0:39:19.880 --> 0:39:35.080
<v Speaker 1>package only at rhoto Experts dot com. Big. This is

0:39:35.160 --> 0:39:38.160
<v Speaker 1>why there are so many question marks about me because

0:39:38.200 --> 0:39:41.640
<v Speaker 1>of music like this and dance moves like that. This

0:39:41.760 --> 0:39:44.120
<v Speaker 1>is what I do it to myself. I'm asking for it.

0:39:46.880 --> 0:39:49.680
<v Speaker 1>Back with you all the fantasy best friends forever Fantasy

0:39:49.840 --> 0:39:55.080
<v Speaker 1>Sports Radio Network. I gotta start a moss pitting here now, Hey,

0:39:55.200 --> 0:39:59.040
<v Speaker 1>That's how I'll earn my respect, good respect, no respect.

0:40:00.000 --> 0:40:02.000
<v Speaker 1>How are you, Gregy? Would you? Would you drop? Would

0:40:03.120 --> 0:40:05.640
<v Speaker 1>Martine Perez? Now? I like Martine Perez though you always

0:40:05.680 --> 0:40:10.839
<v Speaker 1>have really terrible since spring. That's sure you were loving

0:40:10.920 --> 0:40:14.160
<v Speaker 1>him this spring. He's doing something different, Greg, and it

0:40:14.239 --> 0:40:17.160
<v Speaker 1>reminds me a lot of Ecock's former teammate Charlie Important.

0:40:17.160 --> 0:40:19.759
<v Speaker 1>A lot of people made that comp I see some

0:40:19.800 --> 0:40:21.279
<v Speaker 1>of it. He's not getting as many swings and miss

0:40:21.320 --> 0:40:24.120
<v Speaker 1>and not getting nearly as many strikeouts. But Martine Perez,

0:40:24.239 --> 0:40:28.239
<v Speaker 1>he's been pretty effective. Man, talking about that Pecock got

0:40:28.280 --> 0:40:33.360
<v Speaker 1>blown up the other day seven and runs. You mean

0:40:33.400 --> 0:40:36.479
<v Speaker 1>Martine Perez talking that saves. By the way, you mentioned

0:40:36.520 --> 0:40:39.520
<v Speaker 1>Hanzo rob Lass. Should we once again mentioned I p

0:40:39.680 --> 0:40:44.600
<v Speaker 1>K Ian Patrick Kennedy. Nobody calls him I p K.

0:40:45.000 --> 0:40:47.399
<v Speaker 1>It's not true, that's false. Who calls him I PK.

0:40:47.680 --> 0:40:50.160
<v Speaker 1>Here's a Yankee prospect we all used to call him

0:40:50.160 --> 0:40:52.960
<v Speaker 1>I p K. Well, you know I wasn't around back then. Greg.

0:40:53.800 --> 0:40:56.560
<v Speaker 1>When was he actually the one of the top prospects.

0:40:56.880 --> 0:40:59.719
<v Speaker 1>It must have been like early two thousands, so there's

0:40:59.719 --> 0:41:02.240
<v Speaker 1>a big Yankee prospects. Was Phil a huge Joba Chamberlain

0:41:02.320 --> 0:41:05.040
<v Speaker 1>and Ian Kennedy, so that era it was probably when

0:41:05.040 --> 0:41:07.000
<v Speaker 1>I was in high school. I would say, yes, I

0:41:07.120 --> 0:41:10.960
<v Speaker 1>wasn't as in tune with prospect shock back then. But

0:41:11.200 --> 0:41:14.719
<v Speaker 1>you know you're already having like your third kid. I

0:41:14.760 --> 0:41:17.800
<v Speaker 1>have not that you know of. I don't know a

0:41:17.880 --> 0:41:21.279
<v Speaker 1>single kid. Uh yeah. Ian Kennedy, he looks like the

0:41:21.360 --> 0:41:24.000
<v Speaker 1>closing for the Royals right now. While he peralta continues

0:41:24.040 --> 0:41:27.120
<v Speaker 1>to struggle in the back end there, Brad Boxburger, I

0:41:27.200 --> 0:41:29.400
<v Speaker 1>know a lot of people wanted Richard Lovelady to be

0:41:29.440 --> 0:41:31.600
<v Speaker 1>a thing because of you did you wanted? It wasn't me,

0:41:31.680 --> 0:41:34.600
<v Speaker 1>it was Florida, it was you know, let's let's keep

0:41:34.600 --> 0:41:36.600
<v Speaker 1>it really great. Plus he's a lefty, so it's a

0:41:36.600 --> 0:41:39.120
<v Speaker 1>little bit harder for him to earn a the closer's

0:41:39.200 --> 0:41:42.200
<v Speaker 1>job there. Um yeah, I think Ian Kennedy is a guy.

0:41:42.239 --> 0:41:44.480
<v Speaker 1>It's the problem in the Royals are not gonna win

0:41:44.520 --> 0:41:47.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot of games, so how many same opportunities are

0:41:47.400 --> 0:41:49.439
<v Speaker 1>you really going to get? And there's still a chance

0:41:49.480 --> 0:41:51.799
<v Speaker 1>that they mix it up, and for whatever reason, they

0:41:51.840 --> 0:41:54.359
<v Speaker 1>work in a guy like Peralta, So there's just there's

0:41:54.400 --> 0:41:57.719
<v Speaker 1>more unknown there and they're just a bad team. So yes,

0:41:57.800 --> 0:42:03.120
<v Speaker 1>I would take Robless over Ian Kennedy. Um, I think

0:42:03.120 --> 0:42:05.800
<v Speaker 1>it's a little bit closer between Kennedy and Sean Kelly

0:42:07.040 --> 0:42:10.040
<v Speaker 1>at he's the guy for now. Uh yeah, it probably

0:42:10.080 --> 0:42:14.680
<v Speaker 1>would take Seawan Kelly too because the Rangers are hold

0:42:14.719 --> 0:42:17.879
<v Speaker 1>Sean Kelly over Hans a robust thing. I didn't tell

0:42:17.880 --> 0:42:20.320
<v Speaker 1>you to do that though, Just drop go out on

0:42:20.400 --> 0:42:22.520
<v Speaker 1>like your own volition. Greg and like you make these

0:42:22.600 --> 0:42:24.880
<v Speaker 1>moves and then you try and kind of flip the

0:42:24.920 --> 0:42:27.359
<v Speaker 1>script like I told you to do it. I told

0:42:27.400 --> 0:42:29.839
<v Speaker 1>you to pick up James McCanns. Just now, I told

0:42:29.840 --> 0:42:31.800
<v Speaker 1>you to pick up hindsil Roblists. You don't listen to me.

0:42:32.120 --> 0:42:35.279
<v Speaker 1>Should drop Sean Kelly Fords, you listen to me, Greg,

0:42:35.400 --> 0:42:38.239
<v Speaker 1>you'd be doing a lot better, all right, Should drop

0:42:38.360 --> 0:42:42.200
<v Speaker 1>Sean Kelly for hands Robiss, Yes, now I feel annoys man.

0:42:42.239 --> 0:42:44.560
<v Speaker 1>Now minnois all right, So keep Sean Kelly. I don't

0:42:44.560 --> 0:42:47.000
<v Speaker 1>want Sean Kelly. So why did you pick him up?

0:42:47.000 --> 0:42:51.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. It's your own faults. This is so annoying, Frank.

0:42:52.960 --> 0:42:55.560
<v Speaker 1>I'll mentioned a few other twelve team league adds here

0:42:55.560 --> 0:42:57.359
<v Speaker 1>while you do your own little thing over. I'm back.

0:42:57.360 --> 0:43:00.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm not doing anything. Jared I cough, who overall has

0:43:00.160 --> 0:43:04.080
<v Speaker 1>been performing really well. And then Anthony Disclafani. We've talked

0:43:04.120 --> 0:43:06.759
<v Speaker 1>about this at nauseum um the past couple of days.

0:43:06.960 --> 0:43:11.760
<v Speaker 1>Two starts next week against the Giants, and the Giants

0:43:12.600 --> 0:43:15.120
<v Speaker 1>doesn't get better than that. And then he disked Lafani

0:43:15.560 --> 0:43:17.719
<v Speaker 1>and he's actually performing quite well. I believe he has

0:43:17.760 --> 0:43:19.880
<v Speaker 1>like a zero point eight one ear a over his

0:43:19.960 --> 0:43:21.680
<v Speaker 1>last time of the year. Man, whe everyone get excited

0:43:21.719 --> 0:43:23.759
<v Speaker 1>about Anthony desk Lafani, he lets down. He's throwing his

0:43:23.800 --> 0:43:27.880
<v Speaker 1>curveball more this year, Greg, and he's got fastball swinging.

0:43:27.920 --> 0:43:31.200
<v Speaker 1>Strike rate is up. There's a bit to like about

0:43:31.239 --> 0:43:33.880
<v Speaker 1>the start him now while it's still call him Cincinnati.

0:43:33.960 --> 0:43:36.800
<v Speaker 1>That's so I can say I do like him. I

0:43:36.840 --> 0:43:38.239
<v Speaker 1>picked him up in a few leagues. It's a two

0:43:38.239 --> 0:43:40.719
<v Speaker 1>star pitcher next week, all right, just Sclafani your guy

0:43:40.840 --> 0:43:43.319
<v Speaker 1>as a tow start pitcher four next week. One guy

0:43:43.400 --> 0:43:47.480
<v Speaker 1>I added he owned in Yahoo leagues is Chris Bassett.

0:43:47.840 --> 0:43:52.040
<v Speaker 1>Now I think briefly mentioned Bassett last week. He had

0:43:52.080 --> 0:43:54.319
<v Speaker 1>two starts thus far this year, and he's pitch really

0:43:54.400 --> 0:43:57.759
<v Speaker 1>well in both them. What five innings, allowed zero runs

0:43:57.800 --> 0:43:59.840
<v Speaker 1>in his first start, Picker, but win with seven strikeouts.

0:44:00.120 --> 0:44:03.040
<v Speaker 1>His next start, he went seven innings and allowed just

0:44:03.120 --> 0:44:06.279
<v Speaker 1>to run, struck out nine. The quality start didn't get

0:44:06.320 --> 0:44:09.680
<v Speaker 1>to win as Toronto came back. But Chris Bassett Man

0:44:09.760 --> 0:44:15.719
<v Speaker 1>even on him. I'm interested. He's like this journeyman. I

0:44:15.760 --> 0:44:17.680
<v Speaker 1>can't even call him a prospect. He's just a journeyman

0:44:18.000 --> 0:44:21.280
<v Speaker 1>that the Opland ages are trying to find any pictures

0:44:21.320 --> 0:44:24.120
<v Speaker 1>that they can throw out there and his first two stars,

0:44:24.160 --> 0:44:26.400
<v Speaker 1>he gets sixteen strikeouts in twelve inings pat when we

0:44:26.440 --> 0:44:31.280
<v Speaker 1>wonder and run. Now, he did go against Texas tough lineup,

0:44:31.400 --> 0:44:33.560
<v Speaker 1>but that game was in Oko, so it's a little

0:44:33.600 --> 0:44:36.200
<v Speaker 1>bit easier to to navigate through that line up when

0:44:36.239 --> 0:44:39.000
<v Speaker 1>it's not in Arlington, Texas and they are prone to

0:44:39.040 --> 0:44:41.160
<v Speaker 1>striking out, and the same thing for Toronto. They strike

0:44:41.200 --> 0:44:43.680
<v Speaker 1>out a ton. So he had sixteen strikeouts in those

0:44:43.719 --> 0:44:46.960
<v Speaker 1>two starts there. His swinging strike erate is massive. Again,

0:44:47.080 --> 0:44:50.319
<v Speaker 1>it's only been two starts, but it's fourteen point four

0:44:50.400 --> 0:44:54.600
<v Speaker 1>per cent. I'm looking at his usage, not really doing

0:44:55.239 --> 0:44:58.600
<v Speaker 1>things that differently than before. To me, he's more of

0:44:58.680 --> 0:45:00.839
<v Speaker 1>a fifteen team ad than it's twelve team add Gregg,

0:45:01.560 --> 0:45:03.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I wouldn't even rank him in the

0:45:03.840 --> 0:45:07.960
<v Speaker 1>same category as guys like Perezfani and I Cough. I

0:45:08.000 --> 0:45:09.600
<v Speaker 1>would take all three of those guys ahead of him.

0:45:09.640 --> 0:45:11.279
<v Speaker 1>I think he's more of a fifteen team. Who does

0:45:11.320 --> 0:45:16.000
<v Speaker 1>Baskett face next week? I think that's Pittsburgh tomorrow. Who

0:45:16.160 --> 0:45:20.799
<v Speaker 1>really ATE's face late next week? Cincinnati early face. They

0:45:21.040 --> 0:45:25.760
<v Speaker 1>are facing Cleveland, so be him against Cleveland, him against

0:45:25.760 --> 0:45:31.040
<v Speaker 1>Trevor Bauer. That's what I'm seeing right now on May ten. Um,

0:45:33.239 --> 0:45:35.160
<v Speaker 1>it's in Cleveland's line up. Even with the additions of

0:45:35.480 --> 0:45:39.719
<v Speaker 1>Francisco Lindor, they still haven't been great. Nope, not firing yet. Yeah,

0:45:39.800 --> 0:45:42.000
<v Speaker 1>but I don't know. I don't I don't love that

0:45:42.080 --> 0:45:45.680
<v Speaker 1>start overall against power in the Indians, I don't love it.

0:45:45.719 --> 0:45:49.479
<v Speaker 1>But I've keeping bade basket like in a fifteen team league. Again,

0:45:49.560 --> 0:45:51.400
<v Speaker 1>if you need to starting pitching, you need streaming in

0:45:51.400 --> 0:45:53.880
<v Speaker 1>the right matchup. Cleveland hasn't been getting it done. I

0:45:53.920 --> 0:45:55.959
<v Speaker 1>could see starting him and maybe a fift team league

0:45:55.960 --> 0:45:58.040
<v Speaker 1>because he starting the shallower than that. Obviously he's starting

0:45:58.040 --> 0:46:00.319
<v Speaker 1>in the twelve team. He's a streamer when up picking

0:46:00.400 --> 0:46:04.319
<v Speaker 1>him up, Like, I don't love the Cleveland start. If

0:46:04.360 --> 0:46:07.040
<v Speaker 1>you could, would you pick him up for tomorrow start

0:46:07.040 --> 0:46:09.680
<v Speaker 1>against Pittsburgh. Okay, so that's a stream that you would do,

0:46:10.440 --> 0:46:14.120
<v Speaker 1>especially at Pittsburgh. It's a good ballpark to pitching loses

0:46:14.200 --> 0:46:16.680
<v Speaker 1>the d H. He's normally he normally is used to

0:46:16.680 --> 0:46:19.319
<v Speaker 1>pitching against the d H in the American League. Um, yeah,

0:46:19.520 --> 0:46:25.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm fine with that. I'm finding a stream against Pittsburgh. Okay, Um,

0:46:25.680 --> 0:46:28.120
<v Speaker 1>you pick him up over any of the pictures we mentioned,

0:46:28.400 --> 0:46:32.040
<v Speaker 1>I would. I'd rather have all those guys over Bassett,

0:46:32.560 --> 0:46:34.920
<v Speaker 1>But I think I do think he bass Its next,

0:46:35.120 --> 0:46:37.360
<v Speaker 1>probably because the only other picture that I have on

0:46:37.520 --> 0:46:41.520
<v Speaker 1>my list for this week is Tyler Beaty, who's making

0:46:41.680 --> 0:46:45.759
<v Speaker 1>his twenty nineteen debut tomorrow, right tonight. So bed is

0:46:45.760 --> 0:46:49.800
<v Speaker 1>starting tonight for the Giants. Four top prospects um for

0:46:50.200 --> 0:46:53.400
<v Speaker 1>them pitch well thus far introval A, we've kind of

0:46:53.440 --> 0:46:55.600
<v Speaker 1>been winning for not only get called up, but given

0:46:55.640 --> 0:46:59.719
<v Speaker 1>a real opportunity, what do you expect to beat? He

0:47:00.080 --> 0:47:02.759
<v Speaker 1>has strikeout upside, and I think he has talent. You know,

0:47:02.840 --> 0:47:04.839
<v Speaker 1>he throws at mid nineties fastballs. I was reading into

0:47:04.920 --> 0:47:09.320
<v Speaker 1>him last night. His favorite or most useful rather secondary

0:47:09.400 --> 0:47:12.600
<v Speaker 1>offering is a changeup, So he has that fastball changeup combination.

0:47:12.920 --> 0:47:15.160
<v Speaker 1>He can reach mid nineties with his fastball, but he's

0:47:15.160 --> 0:47:18.560
<v Speaker 1>just struggled so much with command, and it's just that's

0:47:18.600 --> 0:47:20.879
<v Speaker 1>been the biggest bugaboo for him. I think he has talent,

0:47:20.960 --> 0:47:24.800
<v Speaker 1>but he hasn't really been able to limit the walks.

0:47:24.840 --> 0:47:28.640
<v Speaker 1>Greg last year in the minors across three levels, the

0:47:28.719 --> 0:47:33.720
<v Speaker 1>guy pitched eighty innings. He was used as a eleven starts,

0:47:33.840 --> 0:47:37.719
<v Speaker 1>and he had twenty four relief appearances in fifty nine

0:47:37.800 --> 0:47:40.680
<v Speaker 1>walks and eighty and his pitched he did average over

0:47:40.760 --> 0:47:43.760
<v Speaker 1>a strikeout for ending. Again, I think he's talented. Maybe

0:47:44.400 --> 0:47:46.879
<v Speaker 1>his long term future is out of the bullpen, where

0:47:47.120 --> 0:47:48.839
<v Speaker 1>you know you only need him to get through one ending.

0:47:49.000 --> 0:47:51.560
<v Speaker 1>He throws hard, he'll get you a strikeout. Maybe struggles

0:47:51.560 --> 0:47:53.719
<v Speaker 1>with command, but that's all right because it's only one

0:47:53.800 --> 0:47:56.200
<v Speaker 1>or two innings. Maybe that's his long term future. And

0:47:56.360 --> 0:47:58.799
<v Speaker 1>you're right, he was a former top prospect, former first

0:47:58.920 --> 0:48:01.279
<v Speaker 1>round pick. He's opt to way down the ranks in

0:48:01.440 --> 0:48:05.120
<v Speaker 1>terms of the San Francisco Giants um prospects overall, just

0:48:05.200 --> 0:48:07.280
<v Speaker 1>their top prospects, not that they have a great farm system.

0:48:07.719 --> 0:48:09.080
<v Speaker 1>So that tells you everything that you need to know

0:48:09.120 --> 0:48:14.440
<v Speaker 1>about Tyler Beatty. I think he he has upside, but

0:48:14.640 --> 0:48:16.399
<v Speaker 1>he just hasn't really been able to put it together.

0:48:16.480 --> 0:48:18.879
<v Speaker 1>And I don't know if pitching in at the major

0:48:18.960 --> 0:48:20.840
<v Speaker 1>league level is gonna be where he figures out how

0:48:20.920 --> 0:48:23.400
<v Speaker 1>to put it together. Greg. So to me, he's more

0:48:23.480 --> 0:48:26.440
<v Speaker 1>of just a guy that I'm paying attention to, I'm scouting.

0:48:26.960 --> 0:48:29.799
<v Speaker 1>We do normally, say in deeper leagues, I'd rather pick

0:48:29.880 --> 0:48:32.040
<v Speaker 1>up someone one week earlier rather than one week late.

0:48:32.480 --> 0:48:34.040
<v Speaker 1>So if you're playing the fifteen teamer and you have

0:48:34.160 --> 0:48:37.359
<v Speaker 1>someone that's useless on your bench, you want to take

0:48:37.400 --> 0:48:39.759
<v Speaker 1>a shot on him. If he pitches okay tonight, then

0:48:40.280 --> 0:48:41.799
<v Speaker 1>that's fine. I don't have a problem with it, as

0:48:41.840 --> 0:48:43.480
<v Speaker 1>long as you're not dropping anybody of value in a

0:48:43.520 --> 0:48:46.600
<v Speaker 1>fifteen teamer anything shallower than that. He's nothing more than

0:48:46.640 --> 0:48:49.359
<v Speaker 1>a scout for me right now, even like the main event.

0:48:49.400 --> 0:48:54.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm asuming he's out there, very very deep league three

0:48:54.360 --> 0:48:59.200
<v Speaker 1>rounds sonday us say he pitches relatively well tonight, Let's

0:48:59.239 --> 0:49:02.040
<v Speaker 1>say equality, Oh that's great, which the quality start. He's

0:49:02.040 --> 0:49:04.080
<v Speaker 1>not gonna leave the rotation? Is there no reason for

0:49:04.120 --> 0:49:06.400
<v Speaker 1>him the late rotation? And he has upside because he

0:49:06.440 --> 0:49:11.400
<v Speaker 1>pitches in San Francisco Ballpark? So would you would you

0:49:11.480 --> 0:49:15.399
<v Speaker 1>be in the bidding on that? Maybe a small bid,

0:49:15.560 --> 0:49:17.000
<v Speaker 1>Like here's what I have on my bench right now,

0:49:17.000 --> 0:49:19.480
<v Speaker 1>I have Pablo Lopez. I'm not dropping Pabo Lopez for him.

0:49:20.040 --> 0:49:23.600
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Sanchez, as bad as he's been, I still think

0:49:23.600 --> 0:49:25.120
<v Speaker 1>he has more upside. At least we've seen him do

0:49:25.160 --> 0:49:26.759
<v Speaker 1>it at the major league level. We haven't seen Tyler

0:49:26.800 --> 0:49:28.160
<v Speaker 1>Beatty do it at the major league level, so I

0:49:28.160 --> 0:49:30.560
<v Speaker 1>would keep Aaron Sanchez over him, and then my guy Greg,

0:49:30.719 --> 0:49:32.719
<v Speaker 1>who you're probably gonna crush me for right now, and

0:49:32.760 --> 0:49:37.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm still holding on. I'm not dropping it for Tyler Beaty.

0:49:38.040 --> 0:49:40.800
<v Speaker 1>Right The Brewers need pitching, So once Jimmy Nelson is

0:49:40.840 --> 0:49:43.239
<v Speaker 1>ready to go, he's gonna be in the rotation. If

0:49:43.280 --> 0:49:46.360
<v Speaker 1>he's ever ready. What's Jimmy Nelson is ready to go?

0:49:47.360 --> 0:49:48.759
<v Speaker 1>Where are you the one that's gonna tell me? He

0:49:48.800 --> 0:49:50.279
<v Speaker 1>told me that it's gonna be their opening day and

0:49:50.360 --> 0:49:52.560
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't opening days. Oh, a week or two in April.

0:49:52.560 --> 0:49:54.200
<v Speaker 1>I didn't say that, I leave he told me April

0:49:54.440 --> 0:49:58.880
<v Speaker 1>pretty probably said mid to late April. It spoiler alert,

0:49:58.920 --> 0:50:03.200
<v Speaker 1>it's not April anymore. Okay, Who is the arguments latest

0:50:03.239 --> 0:50:07.000
<v Speaker 1>update at a triple A soon? Who is the argument

0:50:07.000 --> 0:50:08.800
<v Speaker 1>over Jimmy Nelson versus who? Do you remember? Who? I

0:50:08.840 --> 0:50:12.160
<v Speaker 1>don't remember? Who have Anthony Swarzak? Would you would you

0:50:12.200 --> 0:50:15.440
<v Speaker 1>drop Anthony Swarzak for Tyler Beaty? I think probably. I

0:50:15.480 --> 0:50:17.160
<v Speaker 1>don't think I would, just because there's still a chance

0:50:17.239 --> 0:50:19.160
<v Speaker 1>you get some saves out of Swarzac. You do he

0:50:19.200 --> 0:50:21.319
<v Speaker 1>even start Swarzack that he's on my bench right now?

0:50:22.160 --> 0:50:24.239
<v Speaker 1>Probably would I was behind the strikeout, so I just

0:50:24.280 --> 0:50:26.200
<v Speaker 1>started reloading out on a bunch of starting pitchers in

0:50:26.239 --> 0:50:28.480
<v Speaker 1>my line up. Here's uh, he's actually we forgot to

0:50:28.480 --> 0:50:29.800
<v Speaker 1>put on the list that that should have been on

0:50:29.840 --> 0:50:34.640
<v Speaker 1>the list, and that's Griffin Canning. Griffin Canning on of

0:50:34.640 --> 0:50:37.000
<v Speaker 1>the leaves right now. I mean his first start against

0:50:37.040 --> 0:50:39.640
<v Speaker 1>Toronto earlier this. I'm interested to see what the bidding

0:50:39.719 --> 0:50:41.399
<v Speaker 1>is for him in the main event, because he's gonna

0:50:41.400 --> 0:50:43.920
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna go for a decent amount of money. It

0:50:44.080 --> 0:50:47.280
<v Speaker 1>looks like he's going to His next start is expected

0:50:47.320 --> 0:50:52.320
<v Speaker 1>to come on Tuesday. I believe in Detroit. You're supposed

0:50:52.360 --> 0:50:54.040
<v Speaker 1>to have a two star week next week. If things

0:50:54.120 --> 0:50:56.879
<v Speaker 1>work out for him, we'll say so, Brad Ausmis does.

0:50:57.360 --> 0:50:58.880
<v Speaker 1>I like what I saw at Griffin Canny. He had

0:50:58.880 --> 0:51:00.880
<v Speaker 1>a ton of swinging strikes and first already has this

0:51:01.000 --> 0:51:03.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of weird herky jerky delivery that he does sitting

0:51:03.880 --> 0:51:06.080
<v Speaker 1>nine three miles probably with the fastball, uses a slider

0:51:06.120 --> 0:51:08.560
<v Speaker 1>and a curveball, so he has two breaking pitches and

0:51:08.680 --> 0:51:10.760
<v Speaker 1>there were some pretty nice bite on those breaking pitches.

0:51:10.800 --> 0:51:13.680
<v Speaker 1>He wasn't efficient enough. He couldn't even get through five innings.

0:51:13.920 --> 0:51:16.120
<v Speaker 1>But overall, I think the Angels are gonna leave him

0:51:16.120 --> 0:51:19.960
<v Speaker 1>in the rotation because Boiler Alert their pitching sucks. So

0:51:20.160 --> 0:51:22.840
<v Speaker 1>Griffin Canning is going to have a job in the

0:51:22.920 --> 0:51:27.320
<v Speaker 1>Angels rotation and pretty good ballpark to pitching in Anaheim.

0:51:28.360 --> 0:51:30.120
<v Speaker 1>I think in the main event this weekend, Greg, he's

0:51:30.160 --> 0:51:34.160
<v Speaker 1>gonna go for over ten percent. So I think in

0:51:34.239 --> 0:51:36.880
<v Speaker 1>deeper leagues fifteen teamers, that's probably what you're looking at,

0:51:37.360 --> 0:51:40.680
<v Speaker 1>and eleven percent for Griffin Canning. Um, But in your

0:51:40.719 --> 0:51:43.279
<v Speaker 1>twelve teamers and your home leagues. You know your home

0:51:43.360 --> 0:51:46.560
<v Speaker 1>league better than we do. Definitely, if they're aggressive on

0:51:46.719 --> 0:51:48.759
<v Speaker 1>younger players, then you know that you're gonna have to

0:51:49.200 --> 0:51:51.520
<v Speaker 1>maybe eight to ten percent. But overall, in the twelve

0:51:51.520 --> 0:51:53.759
<v Speaker 1>teamer I think he goes for less than you know

0:51:53.880 --> 0:51:56.719
<v Speaker 1>that ten eleven, twelve percent that he's probably gonna go for.

0:51:57.920 --> 0:52:00.719
<v Speaker 1>Team leagues are deep. So I do like him. You

0:52:00.880 --> 0:52:02.080
<v Speaker 1>like him better than this some of the pictures and

0:52:02.400 --> 0:52:06.479
<v Speaker 1>named I like him more than Bassett. I'll take also

0:52:06.560 --> 0:52:10.520
<v Speaker 1>take Martine Perez over him. Well, so we talk about

0:52:10.640 --> 0:52:16.200
<v Speaker 1>I would take mm hmm. I think Griffin Canning has

0:52:16.280 --> 0:52:19.200
<v Speaker 1>higher upside and the Scolfani. But I do like the

0:52:19.239 --> 0:52:21.759
<v Speaker 1>Skolfani a decent amount. But I would say Griffin Canning

0:52:21.800 --> 0:52:24.680
<v Speaker 1>over him. There was one other pictures we talked about. Oh,

0:52:24.800 --> 0:52:31.319
<v Speaker 1>JAREDI cough. Interesting, Um, I'll take a cough. There had

0:52:31.320 --> 0:52:33.200
<v Speaker 1>a great ballpark to picton in Philly, but should get

0:52:33.200 --> 0:52:34.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot of run support. He looked really good, tho

0:52:35.000 --> 0:52:37.959
<v Speaker 1>far I like Jarediko. Before we wrap up the hour,

0:52:39.520 --> 0:52:41.880
<v Speaker 1>we have to talk a cool name of theory. We

0:52:42.040 --> 0:52:43.840
<v Speaker 1>definitely have. We have to talk a cool nan theory

0:52:44.760 --> 0:52:48.840
<v Speaker 1>because sky Bolt is a real human being and he

0:52:49.000 --> 0:52:51.319
<v Speaker 1>was just just called to What did you tell us

0:52:51.320 --> 0:52:53.680
<v Speaker 1>about sky Bolts? Greg, I can tell you nothing about

0:52:53.760 --> 0:52:57.000
<v Speaker 1>sky Bolt other than evidently that's his real name. He's

0:52:57.000 --> 0:52:59.120
<v Speaker 1>an outfielder. For the age. He wasn't one of their

0:52:59.560 --> 0:53:02.920
<v Speaker 1>top top prospects. He's twenty five years old already. Um.

0:53:03.480 --> 0:53:05.600
<v Speaker 1>He was added to the Major League forty men roster

0:53:05.680 --> 0:53:09.120
<v Speaker 1>after last season, began this year playing in Vegas, and

0:53:09.160 --> 0:53:11.320
<v Speaker 1>got promoted today. That's what I can tell you about Skybold.

0:53:12.400 --> 0:53:15.640
<v Speaker 1>Sky Bolts nineteen rank prospect according to MLB Dot com

0:53:15.680 --> 0:53:19.640
<v Speaker 1>in the Oakland A's organization. Sky Bold my Usain Bolt

0:53:19.640 --> 0:53:23.719
<v Speaker 1>impression there, but overall, you give me a little bit

0:53:23.719 --> 0:53:27.280
<v Speaker 1>of a Derek Fisher field, greg Um, not former Nick's

0:53:27.560 --> 0:53:31.120
<v Speaker 1>coach Derek Fisher, UH Houston Astros Derek Fisher. He has

0:53:31.160 --> 0:53:34.759
<v Speaker 1>an interesting power speed combination, struggles a little bit with strikeouts,

0:53:35.239 --> 0:53:37.560
<v Speaker 1>but also walks a decent amount as well. You know,

0:53:37.640 --> 0:53:40.359
<v Speaker 1>he's been consistently over ten percent walkret in the minor

0:53:40.480 --> 0:53:43.400
<v Speaker 1>leagues last year. Nineteen home runs, nineteen stolen bases, but

0:53:43.480 --> 0:53:46.960
<v Speaker 1>hit two sixties. So because of those strikeouts probably limits

0:53:47.040 --> 0:53:49.040
<v Speaker 1>what he could do with the batting average. This year,

0:53:49.080 --> 0:53:51.680
<v Speaker 1>I will say he's been he's been better. He's batting

0:53:51.719 --> 0:53:55.120
<v Speaker 1>three five so he has been making more contact. Six homers,

0:53:55.120 --> 0:53:57.319
<v Speaker 1>twenty seven ribbies so far this year he said eight

0:53:57.400 --> 0:54:01.120
<v Speaker 1>double He's got three stolen bases, so a decent power

0:54:01.160 --> 0:54:03.880
<v Speaker 1>speed combination. And Greg, I don't think you know, Robbie

0:54:03.920 --> 0:54:07.239
<v Speaker 1>Grossman being there is gonna stop Skybolt from getting playing time.

0:54:07.560 --> 0:54:09.319
<v Speaker 1>They like him enough to call him up. I think

0:54:09.360 --> 0:54:11.440
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna play every day. He's a switch hitter, so

0:54:11.480 --> 0:54:13.000
<v Speaker 1>you do not have to worry about splits. I do

0:54:13.160 --> 0:54:16.000
<v Speaker 1>find it interesting Greg that they opted to call him

0:54:16.080 --> 0:54:18.800
<v Speaker 1>up before they call up Dustin Fowler, former prospectedly the

0:54:18.880 --> 0:54:21.600
<v Speaker 1>Yankees who they got in the sunny great trade. Who's

0:54:21.600 --> 0:54:27.239
<v Speaker 1>there is the opening days? It was last year he

0:54:27.320 --> 0:54:29.600
<v Speaker 1>was opening yeah, or he was up at some point

0:54:29.680 --> 0:54:32.600
<v Speaker 1>he was there. He was playing every day, yeah, last year,

0:54:32.640 --> 0:54:34.400
<v Speaker 1>but it just didn't work out. He hasn't necessarily put

0:54:34.480 --> 0:54:37.640
<v Speaker 1>it together yet. So sky Bolt, twelve teamers, I'm not

0:54:37.719 --> 0:54:40.640
<v Speaker 1>doing it, but fifteen teamers. You need five out fielders,

0:54:40.880 --> 0:54:44.279
<v Speaker 1>interesting power, speed combination. I could see taking a shot

0:54:45.360 --> 0:54:48.919
<v Speaker 1>three four, something like that. Look, five out fielders, anyone

0:54:48.920 --> 0:54:50.839
<v Speaker 1>who has a pulse, anyone who starts every single day

0:54:51.320 --> 0:54:53.440
<v Speaker 1>you kind of have your eye on. And he does

0:54:53.560 --> 0:54:56.880
<v Speaker 1>have prospects status and he has an awsome name. So

0:55:00.640 --> 0:55:03.560
<v Speaker 1>we play in what three, four or fifteen teamers who

0:55:03.600 --> 0:55:06.120
<v Speaker 1>have small bids on him? Oh? Will I only give

0:55:06.160 --> 0:55:10.040
<v Speaker 1>this the cool Land theory. That's the only reason. Yeah, nice,

0:55:10.120 --> 0:55:14.680
<v Speaker 1>go us about that, sky Boult no relation to use

0:55:14.680 --> 0:55:17.120
<v Speaker 1>save my understanding other days to talk about earlier in

0:55:17.120 --> 0:55:20.240
<v Speaker 1>the week was pretended jury. How you Kendricks still continues

0:55:20.280 --> 0:55:22.359
<v Speaker 1>to play, still continues to be hot for the uh

0:55:22.480 --> 0:55:24.960
<v Speaker 1>for the Gnats. Yeah, he's absolutely mashing this year too.

0:55:26.000 --> 0:55:31.280
<v Speaker 1>And Brandon Jury. Brian Reynolds, I'm sorry, I Brian Reynolds.

0:55:31.719 --> 0:55:33.759
<v Speaker 1>Brian Reynolds another one here that just has really good

0:55:33.800 --> 0:55:36.320
<v Speaker 1>bats and ball skills. I think he can help you

0:55:36.440 --> 0:55:39.000
<v Speaker 1>with batting average. I think he's gonna play most of

0:55:39.040 --> 0:55:42.160
<v Speaker 1>the time for It's Bergen. You look at his last

0:55:42.600 --> 0:55:44.399
<v Speaker 1>five games, he has a hit and every single one

0:55:44.680 --> 0:55:46.960
<v Speaker 1>he had a he had a clutch home run in

0:55:47.840 --> 0:55:50.360
<v Speaker 1>I believe it was extra endings the other day against

0:55:50.480 --> 0:55:54.560
<v Speaker 1>the Texas Rangers. That was right after the jose La

0:55:54.640 --> 0:55:58.279
<v Speaker 1>Clark implosion. But I think he has some offside. He's

0:55:58.320 --> 0:56:01.000
<v Speaker 1>he's severely outperforming col Tucker right now on the same team.

0:56:01.760 --> 0:56:04.480
<v Speaker 1>So again, five outfielders. We spoke about him a few

0:56:04.480 --> 0:56:06.160
<v Speaker 1>weeks ago when he first got called up a small

0:56:06.200 --> 0:56:08.279
<v Speaker 1>bid here to three whatever. You just want to see

0:56:08.280 --> 0:56:09.759
<v Speaker 1>what he could do. But he was the guy who

0:56:09.840 --> 0:56:14.640
<v Speaker 1>hit for good batting average in the Miners. Came over

0:56:14.960 --> 0:56:18.200
<v Speaker 1>from the Giants and Andrew mccutchon trade. Um wasn't a

0:56:18.480 --> 0:56:19.920
<v Speaker 1>huge prospect for them. I think he was like a

0:56:19.960 --> 0:56:22.920
<v Speaker 1>top ten prospect for the Pittsburgh Pirates. But I think

0:56:22.960 --> 0:56:28.000
<v Speaker 1>he's a guy that can for batting average if nothing else. Yeah,

0:56:28.239 --> 0:56:30.319
<v Speaker 1>I think so too. He's getting an opportunity to play

0:56:30.360 --> 0:56:32.440
<v Speaker 1>every day. At the moment, as you said, it's performing

0:56:32.440 --> 0:56:35.560
<v Speaker 1>better than Cold Tucker. I want Corey Dickerson his bag.

0:56:36.000 --> 0:56:39.439
<v Speaker 1>You still play every day? Probably not. Well, let's let's

0:56:39.480 --> 0:56:42.120
<v Speaker 1>get there first, right, let's get there first. Five outfielders.

0:56:43.680 --> 0:56:46.000
<v Speaker 1>That's where you pick up a guy like Brian Reynolds.

0:56:46.160 --> 0:56:48.960
<v Speaker 1>Where did a break? I have a lot of games

0:56:49.000 --> 0:56:50.759
<v Speaker 1>I want to play, and I want to get the

0:56:50.800 --> 0:56:53.439
<v Speaker 1>phone lines rocking. You want to It's night's Yankee game.

0:56:53.920 --> 0:56:56.080
<v Speaker 1>You call it right now at eight four four eight

0:56:56.200 --> 0:56:59.080
<v Speaker 1>four three six eight seven nine eight four four eight

0:56:59.200 --> 0:57:01.560
<v Speaker 1>four three six eight seven nine, we're gonna win six

0:57:01.719 --> 0:57:09.279
<v Speaker 1>naked and rattles m