WEBVTT - Patriots Catch-22 9/14: Three Positives on the Offense, Eagles Takeaways, Dolphins Preview

0:00:03.920 --> 0:00:07.240
<v Speaker 1>This is the Patriots Catch twenty two podcasts with Evan

0:00:07.320 --> 0:00:11.080
<v Speaker 1>Lazar and Alex Barth and Lazarre.

0:00:11.160 --> 0:00:14.400
<v Speaker 2>Hello, everybody nailed it, joined us always buy our bark.

0:00:18.160 --> 0:00:21.120
<v Speaker 2>Here is Evan Lazar and Alex bars. I said we

0:00:21.120 --> 0:00:23.200
<v Speaker 2>weren't going to get into the steam minutia, but that

0:00:23.200 --> 0:00:25.799
<v Speaker 2>that was it. That's what we do. I said, I

0:00:25.840 --> 0:00:27.200
<v Speaker 2>was gonna set the table first, but.

0:00:27.120 --> 0:00:28.840
<v Speaker 1>We didn't say pleasantry.

0:00:30.800 --> 0:00:33.720
<v Speaker 2>You guys don't believe in pleasantries over over at the hub.

0:00:33.800 --> 0:00:35.159
<v Speaker 1>You got no we got we gotta show it.

0:00:35.360 --> 0:00:37.280
<v Speaker 2>You're you're not into pleasantries, so we're not gonna do

0:00:37.360 --> 0:00:40.920
<v Speaker 2>pleasantries here today. It's Evan Lazarre, Alex Barth, Patriots Catch

0:00:40.960 --> 0:00:43.720
<v Speaker 2>twenty two with you until about four o'clock here today,

0:00:43.960 --> 0:00:46.080
<v Speaker 2>so we gotta get a long show today morell we got.

0:00:46.080 --> 0:00:49.080
<v Speaker 2>We got almost the two full hours here, so it's

0:00:49.120 --> 0:00:51.919
<v Speaker 2>gonna be fun. It's gonna be good. Alex. We were

0:00:51.920 --> 0:00:54.280
<v Speaker 2>just talking before we we hit record on the show

0:00:54.320 --> 0:00:58.280
<v Speaker 2>that everybody is against your boy. Now everybody hates me, Alex.

0:00:58.880 --> 0:01:01.000
<v Speaker 2>I I am I I am too negative. I'm the

0:01:01.000 --> 0:01:04.200
<v Speaker 2>grinch that stole Christmas or the week one moral victory

0:01:04.840 --> 0:01:08.520
<v Speaker 2>for the New England Patriots, and uh, everyone hates me.

0:01:08.880 --> 0:01:12.640
<v Speaker 2>Everyone's mad, everyone's fired up. They're on the YouTube comments,

0:01:12.640 --> 0:01:17.479
<v Speaker 2>they're emailing, they're they're they're they're tweeting at me. Uh,

0:01:17.560 --> 0:01:20.920
<v Speaker 2>they're they're coming after me for my my Tuesday PU show,

0:01:21.240 --> 0:01:25.880
<v Speaker 2>talking about me everywhere, just kidding about how negative I

0:01:26.040 --> 0:01:28.880
<v Speaker 2>was about this Patriots team. So right off the top

0:01:28.920 --> 0:01:31.640
<v Speaker 2>of the show, here's what we're gonna do. Here's what

0:01:31.680 --> 0:01:33.680
<v Speaker 2>we're gonna do, so that all of you get off

0:01:33.720 --> 0:01:35.800
<v Speaker 2>my back and tell me that I'm not being negative

0:01:35.840 --> 0:01:38.360
<v Speaker 2>anymore and we can all move on from that. I'm

0:01:38.400 --> 0:01:44.200
<v Speaker 2>gonna give you three three whole nice things about your offense,

0:01:44.240 --> 0:01:47.560
<v Speaker 2>Patriots fans, three nice things about the offense. I'm gonna

0:01:47.560 --> 0:01:49.960
<v Speaker 2>go one at a time. Let Alex interject in between.

0:01:50.600 --> 0:01:52.559
<v Speaker 2>But I'm gonna say three nice things about this offense

0:01:52.640 --> 0:01:55.520
<v Speaker 2>right now. So get off my back, all right. Get

0:01:56.000 --> 0:01:59.560
<v Speaker 2>this is positive, positive energy only, and I'm being one

0:01:59.640 --> 0:02:03.840
<v Speaker 2>hundred sense sincere, you ready go for it.

0:02:03.920 --> 0:02:05.680
<v Speaker 1>Let's see, let's see how since here you can really

0:02:05.720 --> 0:02:06.080
<v Speaker 1>be here.

0:02:07.120 --> 0:02:10.320
<v Speaker 2>Number One, I loved what I saw from Bill O'Brien

0:02:10.520 --> 0:02:13.320
<v Speaker 2>in this game. Thought Bill O'Brien had a great script.

0:02:13.480 --> 0:02:16.520
<v Speaker 2>I thought he had great call sheet called good plays

0:02:16.520 --> 0:02:20.080
<v Speaker 2>in this game. I think a big reason why the

0:02:20.160 --> 0:02:24.200
<v Speaker 2>offensive line that was completely overmatched and overwhelmed in this game.

0:02:24.240 --> 0:02:27.320
<v Speaker 2>Despite some narrative I said, it's gonna be positive something,

0:02:27.800 --> 0:02:30.440
<v Speaker 2>all right, and here we go, I can't even do it, okay,

0:02:32.000 --> 0:02:35.680
<v Speaker 2>despite the mismatch between the offensive line and the defensive line,

0:02:35.800 --> 0:02:38.600
<v Speaker 2>I thought a big reason in this game why it

0:02:38.680 --> 0:02:42.160
<v Speaker 2>didn't take over the game for Philadelphia is because of

0:02:42.200 --> 0:02:45.240
<v Speaker 2>how O'Brien called the game. Yeah, and I understand that

0:02:45.320 --> 0:02:47.720
<v Speaker 2>some people get annoyed by the thirteen screens and all

0:02:47.760 --> 0:02:49.840
<v Speaker 2>that kind of stuff, but it had to be it

0:02:49.880 --> 0:02:52.000
<v Speaker 2>had to be done. It had to be done. In

0:02:52.040 --> 0:02:54.200
<v Speaker 2>this game, I thought that they at least changed it

0:02:54.280 --> 0:02:56.560
<v Speaker 2>up enough with the screens that there was some different

0:02:56.560 --> 0:02:58.520
<v Speaker 2>ones that thrown in there, and then they finally sprung

0:02:58.639 --> 0:03:03.400
<v Speaker 2>the one for Romandra in the fourth quarter. The bunch

0:03:03.480 --> 0:03:07.040
<v Speaker 2>formations were excellent. And I think that this is something

0:03:07.080 --> 0:03:10.240
<v Speaker 2>that I really love about O'Brien, and he's talked about

0:03:10.240 --> 0:03:12.239
<v Speaker 2>this in some of the coaching clinics that he's done.

0:03:13.200 --> 0:03:15.360
<v Speaker 2>One of the things I really love about him is

0:03:15.400 --> 0:03:19.160
<v Speaker 2>that when he finds something that works against a defense,

0:03:19.560 --> 0:03:22.160
<v Speaker 2>he's not afraid to just keep pressing the button. A

0:03:22.200 --> 0:03:24.480
<v Speaker 2>lot of offensive coordinators and we're going to maybe talk

0:03:24.520 --> 0:03:26.880
<v Speaker 2>about one here later on in the show that I

0:03:27.280 --> 0:03:29.760
<v Speaker 2>a play caller, I guess I should say later on

0:03:29.800 --> 0:03:32.600
<v Speaker 2>in the show, think that every single play needs to

0:03:32.600 --> 0:03:36.280
<v Speaker 2>be unique and different, and like they want to win.

0:03:37.200 --> 0:03:39.720
<v Speaker 2>They're trying to win every single play, right And I'm

0:03:39.760 --> 0:03:42.080
<v Speaker 2>not saying O'Brien's not, but like you understand what I'm saying,

0:03:42.080 --> 0:03:45.800
<v Speaker 2>Like everything is different, window dressing, different design, YadA, YadA YadA.

0:03:46.320 --> 0:03:50.120
<v Speaker 2>Bill O'Brien figured out that the Eagles were having difficulties

0:03:50.160 --> 0:03:53.640
<v Speaker 2>with the bunch formations, especially those tight bunches. That what

0:03:53.680 --> 0:03:56.160
<v Speaker 2>we saw in Kendrick Bourne's touchdown, the throw to Mario

0:03:56.200 --> 0:03:59.040
<v Speaker 2>Douglas on the sideline on the corner route, and he

0:03:59.160 --> 0:04:02.040
<v Speaker 2>just kept pressing the but and he just kept hitting

0:04:02.080 --> 0:04:05.640
<v Speaker 2>the play, hitting it, hitting it, and until you stop it,

0:04:06.080 --> 0:04:08.960
<v Speaker 2>I'm not gonna let you off the hook by going

0:04:09.000 --> 0:04:12.800
<v Speaker 2>to different things. Really enjoyed that with Bill O'Brien, thought

0:04:12.800 --> 0:04:14.680
<v Speaker 2>that he called the game well in terms of managing

0:04:14.760 --> 0:04:17.440
<v Speaker 2>the offensive line and managing the situation of the game.

0:04:17.760 --> 0:04:20.280
<v Speaker 2>And I thought he had Mac buttoned up in terms

0:04:20.320 --> 0:04:22.599
<v Speaker 2>of his decision making and where his eyes were going,

0:04:22.640 --> 0:04:26.600
<v Speaker 2>and like things like that. So overall made in voyage

0:04:26.600 --> 0:04:29.080
<v Speaker 2>of Bill O'Brien in the regular season, I give him

0:04:29.120 --> 0:04:32.760
<v Speaker 2>an A minus an a minus. The only knock that

0:04:32.800 --> 0:04:35.400
<v Speaker 2>I had on this plan out of everything, I wish

0:04:35.400 --> 0:04:38.640
<v Speaker 2>there was a little bit more motion. I wanted them

0:04:38.680 --> 0:04:41.440
<v Speaker 2>to kind of stress the Eagles the same way Kansas

0:04:41.480 --> 0:04:44.400
<v Speaker 2>City did in the Super Bowl by using motion. Maybe

0:04:44.440 --> 0:04:47.080
<v Speaker 2>a little bit more motion, a little bit more downfield RPO.

0:04:47.160 --> 0:04:49.760
<v Speaker 2>You know, I love both those things. That might be

0:04:49.800 --> 0:04:52.560
<v Speaker 2>the next iteration, but in terms of what we saw

0:04:52.800 --> 0:04:55.800
<v Speaker 2>in Week one, really enjoyed this game script from Bill

0:04:55.800 --> 0:04:57.320
<v Speaker 2>O'Brien and I thought he called a good game.

0:04:57.600 --> 0:04:59.880
<v Speaker 1>I thought he did too. Again, you talk about this,

0:05:00.000 --> 0:05:02.000
<v Speaker 1>this is everything I've been yelling for the offense to

0:05:02.040 --> 0:05:04.599
<v Speaker 1>be for two years, right it? Remember last year is

0:05:04.600 --> 0:05:06.320
<v Speaker 1>that we were talking about, No, the strength and in

0:05:06.360 --> 0:05:08.120
<v Speaker 1>this wide receiver group is the depth. It's not the

0:05:08.120 --> 0:05:10.000
<v Speaker 1>top of the depth chart. And they shouldn't have anybody

0:05:10.040 --> 0:05:13.440
<v Speaker 1>that really plays over an overwhelming amount and mix and

0:05:13.480 --> 0:05:16.280
<v Speaker 1>match the combinations, put them in different formations. Last year

0:05:16.320 --> 0:05:18.880
<v Speaker 1>was the same three guys in like two or three

0:05:18.880 --> 0:05:21.839
<v Speaker 1>formations and that was it. And that first drive. I

0:05:21.880 --> 0:05:24.120
<v Speaker 1>mean they're subbing in and out like this and like that,

0:05:24.160 --> 0:05:26.760
<v Speaker 1>and they're in bunch and they're five wide and they

0:05:26.760 --> 0:05:29.120
<v Speaker 1>were in i think three at one point, depending on

0:05:29.120 --> 0:05:31.800
<v Speaker 1>how you want to qualify time Montgomery, and I mean

0:05:31.800 --> 0:05:34.560
<v Speaker 1>he got weird in a good way, uh throughout the game.

0:05:34.640 --> 0:05:36.080
<v Speaker 1>So I really liked what I had, what I was

0:05:36.120 --> 0:05:40.520
<v Speaker 1>off O'Brien. The one nitpick I had was on the

0:05:40.600 --> 0:05:44.280
<v Speaker 1>play before the final play, the kaishaon booty fourth down.

0:05:45.040 --> 0:05:48.280
<v Speaker 1>The screen on third and thirteen felt very McDaniel's ish

0:05:48.440 --> 0:05:48.640
<v Speaker 1>to me.

0:05:49.000 --> 0:05:52.520
<v Speaker 2>It was tough. I under the defensive line of the

0:05:52.560 --> 0:05:53.920
<v Speaker 2>Eagles made a great play on it.

0:05:54.320 --> 0:05:56.400
<v Speaker 1>So but that's the thing, like I understand the defense

0:05:56.440 --> 0:05:58.360
<v Speaker 1>of that, Like, hey, they knew it was four down territory.

0:05:58.400 --> 0:05:59.760
<v Speaker 1>They wanted to try it. They weren't trying to get

0:05:59.760 --> 0:06:01.360
<v Speaker 1>it all once. They're trying to get to like at

0:06:01.440 --> 0:06:04.240
<v Speaker 1>least a fourth and six, fourth and seven. But against

0:06:04.240 --> 0:06:06.799
<v Speaker 1>that defensive front, with the way the screens were working

0:06:06.880 --> 0:06:08.839
<v Speaker 1>in the game, I know Wheremandre hit one big one,

0:06:08.920 --> 0:06:10.960
<v Speaker 1>but outside of that, I didn't think they're having a

0:06:11.000 --> 0:06:13.920
<v Speaker 1>ton of success on it. I'm not against the philosophy,

0:06:14.120 --> 0:06:15.880
<v Speaker 1>like they didn't need to pick up the thirteen yards

0:06:15.920 --> 0:06:19.240
<v Speaker 1>on third and thirteen. I'm not against that, but was

0:06:19.279 --> 0:06:22.360
<v Speaker 1>there a was there a better way to get six

0:06:22.480 --> 0:06:25.440
<v Speaker 1>or seven yards than throwing the ball into the backfield

0:06:25.520 --> 0:06:28.120
<v Speaker 1>in that situation. That was my one nit pick. Besides that,

0:06:28.320 --> 0:06:32.920
<v Speaker 1>I thought the offensive game plan was awesome this week.

0:06:32.960 --> 0:06:35.520
<v Speaker 1>I really liked what they did, especially given the circumstances

0:06:35.520 --> 0:06:37.440
<v Speaker 1>of who they had available and who they were facing.

0:06:37.520 --> 0:06:40.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, the screen I watched back those those final two

0:06:40.520 --> 0:06:42.760
<v Speaker 2>drives this morning just to make sure I had it

0:06:42.839 --> 0:06:46.320
<v Speaker 2>right in my head, and the screen was. It was

0:06:46.360 --> 0:06:49.000
<v Speaker 2>set up to hit because they the Eagles were in

0:06:49.040 --> 0:06:51.279
<v Speaker 2>a too high safety shell. There was not a whole

0:06:51.279 --> 0:06:52.680
<v Speaker 2>lot of players in the box. I think there was

0:06:52.720 --> 0:06:55.600
<v Speaker 2>only one off ball linebacker on the play, and one

0:06:55.600 --> 0:06:58.400
<v Speaker 2>of our guys, Jordan Davis, made just a ridiculous play

0:06:59.040 --> 0:07:03.520
<v Speaker 2>to come off his rush and really force Remandre to cut.

0:07:03.800 --> 0:07:06.160
<v Speaker 2>If Remondre doesn't have to take that extra jump cut

0:07:06.160 --> 0:07:08.960
<v Speaker 2>to get around Jordan Davis, then he just goes right

0:07:09.040 --> 0:07:11.640
<v Speaker 2>up the field, up the gut off of David Andrews's

0:07:11.680 --> 0:07:15.400
<v Speaker 2>block and gets probably eight nine yards before the safeties

0:07:15.400 --> 0:07:17.720
<v Speaker 2>come down and crash on him. But Jordan Davis made

0:07:18.200 --> 0:07:20.960
<v Speaker 2>a fantastic play on that. But I understand that you

0:07:21.000 --> 0:07:23.320
<v Speaker 2>wanted them to be a little bit more aggressive there,

0:07:23.360 --> 0:07:26.480
<v Speaker 2>and I don't fault you for it. But overall, I

0:07:26.480 --> 0:07:28.840
<v Speaker 2>thought O'Brien was great. I did want to like talk

0:07:28.840 --> 0:07:30.920
<v Speaker 2>a little bit more about the bunches and the stacks

0:07:30.920 --> 0:07:34.000
<v Speaker 2>that they were using. I just love this part of

0:07:34.000 --> 0:07:36.960
<v Speaker 2>Bill O'Brien's playbook. I think it puts the defense in

0:07:37.200 --> 0:07:41.120
<v Speaker 2>such a mind pretzel trying to cover these types of

0:07:41.200 --> 0:07:44.360
<v Speaker 2>routes because what the Patriots will do with the route

0:07:45.440 --> 0:07:47.440
<v Speaker 2>a lot of the times, there'll be an option on

0:07:47.440 --> 0:07:49.880
<v Speaker 2>one of the three routes side of the bunch that

0:07:50.080 --> 0:07:52.280
<v Speaker 2>is just breaking off of leverage. So for example, on

0:07:52.320 --> 0:07:55.600
<v Speaker 2>the Tomrio Douglas throw on the corner route, this is

0:07:55.720 --> 0:07:57.760
<v Speaker 2>just I don't know for a fact, but I'm just

0:07:57.800 --> 0:08:02.680
<v Speaker 2>like guessing Tomroo Doug I believe has a post corner

0:08:02.760 --> 0:08:04.480
<v Speaker 2>like he can break onto the post or it can

0:08:04.560 --> 0:08:07.640
<v Speaker 2>break on the corner, depending on how the defensive back

0:08:07.680 --> 0:08:10.200
<v Speaker 2>plays it. Right, the defensive back sits inside, he's going

0:08:10.240 --> 0:08:12.200
<v Speaker 2>to break the corner. If he sits outside, he's going

0:08:12.240 --> 0:08:15.360
<v Speaker 2>to break the post. And a I just think that

0:08:15.360 --> 0:08:18.520
<v Speaker 2>that's such a mind f like, you know, if you're

0:08:18.600 --> 0:08:20.440
<v Speaker 2>the defensive back, like you're trying to pick him up

0:08:20.440 --> 0:08:22.920
<v Speaker 2>out of the bunch formation. Now he's got this two

0:08:22.920 --> 0:08:25.280
<v Speaker 2>way option, there's all sorts of space. He really can't

0:08:25.360 --> 0:08:27.120
<v Speaker 2>jam him because he's in the bunch to begin with,

0:08:27.160 --> 0:08:29.400
<v Speaker 2>so you can't get hands on early, and he just

0:08:29.440 --> 0:08:31.560
<v Speaker 2>has all this freedom to just then go ahead and

0:08:31.880 --> 0:08:34.960
<v Speaker 2>make a move and get open. And the other thing

0:08:35.000 --> 0:08:36.600
<v Speaker 2>I liked about that play in particular too, is that

0:08:36.640 --> 0:08:39.480
<v Speaker 2>the Mario made the the right read, ran the right

0:08:40.000 --> 0:08:43.600
<v Speaker 2>ran the right route. So I was really impressed with

0:08:43.679 --> 0:08:45.719
<v Speaker 2>the bunches, the stacks, you know, they run a lot

0:08:45.720 --> 0:08:48.760
<v Speaker 2>of that two lane you know, to option routes. One

0:08:48.800 --> 0:08:51.320
<v Speaker 2>at twelve yards, one at six yards. That worked like

0:08:51.480 --> 0:08:55.760
<v Speaker 2>multiple times. It worked on a on a Kendrick Born

0:08:55.840 --> 0:08:59.319
<v Speaker 2>throw for about eighteen yards, you know, Kendrick cott the

0:08:59.400 --> 0:09:01.800
<v Speaker 2>underneath option and then turned it upfield and ran for

0:09:01.840 --> 0:09:04.559
<v Speaker 2>about fourteen yards after the catch, and worked on fourth

0:09:04.600 --> 0:09:06.640
<v Speaker 2>down to Hunter Henry even though you had to one

0:09:06.720 --> 0:09:09.360
<v Speaker 2>hand and catch it, the concept itself worked and got

0:09:09.440 --> 0:09:11.560
<v Speaker 2>them open. So I thought that a lot of that

0:09:11.679 --> 0:09:13.800
<v Speaker 2>was really good. I think you'll continue to see a

0:09:13.800 --> 0:09:16.160
<v Speaker 2>lot of that moving forward. It's just fun to watch those,

0:09:16.360 --> 0:09:18.920
<v Speaker 2>like to break them down and to see them the

0:09:19.000 --> 0:09:21.920
<v Speaker 2>spacing and the sequencing of it together, and the different

0:09:21.960 --> 0:09:24.400
<v Speaker 2>options that they have off those bunch formations, a lot

0:09:24.440 --> 0:09:26.720
<v Speaker 2>of different things you can do with them. So I

0:09:26.760 --> 0:09:31.160
<v Speaker 2>was really impressed with that. So there's one positive. I

0:09:31.200 --> 0:09:36.000
<v Speaker 2>did it. That was all positive. Right, you brought up

0:09:36.000 --> 0:09:36.440
<v Speaker 2>the screen.

0:09:36.720 --> 0:09:38.440
<v Speaker 1>No, you brought up something before that.

0:09:38.679 --> 0:09:42.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, set, Yeah, but I reset, I reset, you know,

0:09:42.320 --> 0:09:46.000
<v Speaker 2>we kill kill right, reset, We did it again. Number two.

0:09:47.960 --> 0:09:51.240
<v Speaker 2>In this game, I have said a lot of negative

0:09:51.240 --> 0:09:53.880
<v Speaker 2>things about Mac Jones. I will own that. Gonna give

0:09:53.920 --> 0:09:57.160
<v Speaker 2>them a positive in this I thought that Mac Jones

0:09:57.360 --> 0:09:59.760
<v Speaker 2>as well as Bill O'Brien did a really really good

0:09:59.840 --> 0:10:02.440
<v Speaker 2>job of managing the rush in this game. Two point

0:10:02.520 --> 0:10:05.800
<v Speaker 2>three eight time to throw on average, which is very

0:10:05.960 --> 0:10:07.800
<v Speaker 2>very fast. Now, a lot of that's quick game screen,

0:10:07.880 --> 0:10:10.199
<v Speaker 2>I get that, but that's all part of it, right,

0:10:10.240 --> 0:10:13.200
<v Speaker 2>that's running all those things is all part of it.

0:10:13.280 --> 0:10:15.040
<v Speaker 2>And I thought he did a really good job of

0:10:15.120 --> 0:10:15.960
<v Speaker 2>getting the ball out.

0:10:16.080 --> 0:10:16.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:10:16.280 --> 0:10:17.800
<v Speaker 2>I thought he did a really good job of managing

0:10:17.840 --> 0:10:20.400
<v Speaker 2>the rush in the pocket, you know, maneuvering, making little subtle,

0:10:20.440 --> 0:10:22.600
<v Speaker 2>those subtle movements we talk about all the time. That

0:10:22.720 --> 0:10:26.920
<v Speaker 2>didn't seem like he has had that innate miss last year.

0:10:26.960 --> 0:10:30.559
<v Speaker 2>He handled pressure well for the most part. Yeah, and

0:10:30.679 --> 0:10:31.840
<v Speaker 2>he was able to for.

0:10:32.200 --> 0:10:34.800
<v Speaker 1>What it was against that rush with the offensive line

0:10:34.800 --> 0:10:36.319
<v Speaker 1>he had, he handled pressure well in this game.

0:10:36.480 --> 0:10:40.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I agree. And I think which was.

0:10:40.080 --> 0:10:41.959
<v Speaker 1>The biggest question coming into the season with him.

0:10:42.000 --> 0:10:45.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Again, I thought that there was a lot of

0:10:45.720 --> 0:10:47.480
<v Speaker 2>the reason why I said earlier, and I know I

0:10:47.520 --> 0:10:49.959
<v Speaker 2>said no negativity, but the reason why I said earlier

0:10:50.040 --> 0:10:52.720
<v Speaker 2>that the offensive line performance was really not that good

0:10:52.760 --> 0:10:55.080
<v Speaker 2>despite what we've heard about, you know, not giving up

0:10:55.080 --> 0:10:56.040
<v Speaker 2>a sack until the fourth quarter.

0:10:56.080 --> 0:10:57.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm actually kind of with you on that one.

0:10:57.320 --> 0:11:01.080
<v Speaker 2>But the offensive line performance was not that good because

0:11:01.120 --> 0:11:03.240
<v Speaker 2>a lot of guys were giving up hurries, but they

0:11:03.240 --> 0:11:06.920
<v Speaker 2>were hurries and not hits or sacks right because of Mac,

0:11:07.240 --> 0:11:08.680
<v Speaker 2>And I give Mac a lot of credit.

0:11:08.720 --> 0:11:10.880
<v Speaker 1>It was that Mac was his own best pass protector

0:11:11.080 --> 0:11:12.800
<v Speaker 1>in this game. And he said how many times we

0:11:12.800 --> 0:11:15.040
<v Speaker 1>say that this offseason, that's who Mac's gonna need to

0:11:15.080 --> 0:11:17.880
<v Speaker 1>be in twenty twenty three, And I thought he absolutely

0:11:17.880 --> 0:11:19.679
<v Speaker 1>was his own best pass We'll get to the offensive

0:11:19.679 --> 0:11:22.840
<v Speaker 1>line I'm with you on that one. I think for

0:11:22.920 --> 0:11:26.280
<v Speaker 1>what it was, it was fine. Yeah, but there's some

0:11:26.400 --> 0:11:29.079
<v Speaker 1>really heavy qualifiers that come with that that just are

0:11:29.240 --> 0:11:31.040
<v Speaker 1>applicable to this one specific game.

0:11:31.160 --> 0:11:34.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. And lastly, just on Mac with the pressure, I

0:11:34.280 --> 0:11:36.200
<v Speaker 2>thought he did a really good job of controlling the

0:11:36.240 --> 0:11:39.720
<v Speaker 2>depth of his drops in this game, which is an underrated,

0:11:39.800 --> 0:11:40.560
<v Speaker 2>sneaky thing.

0:11:41.280 --> 0:11:42.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, how many times did we see him last

0:11:42.800 --> 0:11:44.600
<v Speaker 1>year when he got pressured where he double back and

0:11:44.640 --> 0:11:47.080
<v Speaker 1>he'd start twisting around like I don't think did he

0:11:47.120 --> 0:11:48.120
<v Speaker 1>do that once in this game?

0:11:48.480 --> 0:11:52.080
<v Speaker 2>And he did a great job. I thought he was

0:11:52.160 --> 0:11:56.120
<v Speaker 2>really dropping for the most part. So the rule of

0:11:56.160 --> 0:11:57.960
<v Speaker 2>thumb is that you want to get the rusher on

0:11:58.160 --> 0:12:00.680
<v Speaker 2>we're talking about edge rushers now, you want to get

0:12:00.760 --> 0:12:05.359
<v Speaker 2>edge rushers ten yards past the quarterback ten yards. Yeah,

0:12:05.440 --> 0:12:10.000
<v Speaker 2>if it's eleven yards in the quarterback gets sacked, then

0:12:10.280 --> 0:12:12.240
<v Speaker 2>that's on the quarterback. The quarterback's got to step up

0:12:12.240 --> 0:12:14.160
<v Speaker 2>in the pocket. Now, if there's interior press, like I get,

0:12:14.160 --> 0:12:16.360
<v Speaker 2>there's other factors. But the point is is that if

0:12:16.400 --> 0:12:19.240
<v Speaker 2>you're a tackle, your job is to block the edge

0:12:19.280 --> 0:12:22.280
<v Speaker 2>rusher ten yards past the quarterback. I cannot tell you

0:12:22.320 --> 0:12:24.560
<v Speaker 2>how many times in this game, Mac was dropping to

0:12:24.600 --> 0:12:27.400
<v Speaker 2>like seven or eight yards on purpose because he knew

0:12:27.400 --> 0:12:30.720
<v Speaker 2>that Calvin Anderson was probably gonna be a little shaky

0:12:30.760 --> 0:12:32.880
<v Speaker 2>over there in his first game. And they did a

0:12:32.920 --> 0:12:34.920
<v Speaker 2>really good job at controlling the depth of the pocket,

0:12:35.040 --> 0:12:37.720
<v Speaker 2>really really good job. And he threw made some throws

0:12:37.720 --> 0:12:40.800
<v Speaker 2>while under pressure, most notably the kender Born drop. Unfortunately,

0:12:40.840 --> 0:12:42.640
<v Speaker 2>but that throw is a great throw. Well, it was

0:12:42.679 --> 0:12:45.400
<v Speaker 2>some pressure in his face, Seemer. There was a lot

0:12:45.400 --> 0:12:48.600
<v Speaker 2>of a lot of positivity about Mac Jones. All right,

0:12:49.080 --> 0:12:50.760
<v Speaker 2>I said a lot of positive things.

0:12:50.559 --> 0:12:53.280
<v Speaker 1>It was the insistence to not acknowledge any of this

0:12:53.440 --> 0:12:56.680
<v Speaker 1>earlier in the week and not a breakdown that was puzzling.

0:12:56.920 --> 0:12:59.360
<v Speaker 2>A lot of positive things about your quarterback.

0:12:59.400 --> 0:13:00.560
<v Speaker 1>So where was this on Tuesday?

0:13:01.080 --> 0:13:05.400
<v Speaker 2>We'll get the tuesday anyways. Is that enough gushing about

0:13:05.440 --> 0:13:07.040
<v Speaker 2>the quarterback? Said three things? Yes?

0:13:07.280 --> 0:13:10.040
<v Speaker 1>Oh about the Yeah, all right, yeah, last one.

0:13:11.960 --> 0:13:15.920
<v Speaker 2>Round of applause to the captain David Andrews. Great game

0:13:16.360 --> 0:13:19.559
<v Speaker 2>by David Andrews. I thought David Andrews played one of

0:13:19.600 --> 0:13:21.360
<v Speaker 2>his better games I've seen him play in a while,

0:13:22.120 --> 0:13:26.080
<v Speaker 2>not only blocking like snap to snap individually, but I

0:13:26.120 --> 0:13:29.880
<v Speaker 2>give he was helping those rookie guards out a ton

0:13:30.240 --> 0:13:32.960
<v Speaker 2>pre snap and he did a great job in this

0:13:33.120 --> 0:13:37.000
<v Speaker 2>game with a ton of chaos around him and two

0:13:37.040 --> 0:13:39.520
<v Speaker 2>guards that were getting beat like a drum on both

0:13:39.559 --> 0:13:42.800
<v Speaker 2>sides of him. And David Andrews. I said, no, dang it,

0:13:43.120 --> 0:13:48.760
<v Speaker 2>but still David Andrews. David Andrews, great, great game from him.

0:13:49.040 --> 0:13:51.720
<v Speaker 2>I hope that the hamstring's okay. I think it will be.

0:13:51.880 --> 0:13:54.319
<v Speaker 2>He's a tough guy, he'll play through it. But I

0:13:54.640 --> 0:13:57.360
<v Speaker 2>really was impressed by by Da. He was great in

0:13:57.360 --> 0:13:57.760
<v Speaker 2>this game.

0:13:58.520 --> 0:14:02.520
<v Speaker 1>I nothing about the Jamario Douglas or Kendrick Bourne makes

0:14:02.559 --> 0:14:06.719
<v Speaker 1>it into your positives. Not yet, Oh come on, not yet,

0:14:07.040 --> 0:14:08.480
<v Speaker 1>not yet. We're not gonna talk about it yet on

0:14:08.480 --> 0:14:10.160
<v Speaker 1>the show. Or not yet. You're not willing to compliment

0:14:10.200 --> 0:14:10.720
<v Speaker 1>either of them.

0:14:10.760 --> 0:14:13.280
<v Speaker 2>But I didn't say I'm not ready to compliment any

0:14:13.280 --> 0:14:15.640
<v Speaker 2>of them. Don't know, you don't get all crazy. I

0:14:15.720 --> 0:14:17.600
<v Speaker 2>just said that, like, we'll talk about it, we'll get

0:14:17.600 --> 0:14:21.560
<v Speaker 2>to it. Yeah, but these are my three like gold stars, okay, Like.

0:14:21.480 --> 0:14:24.720
<v Speaker 1>I look, you watched the line closer than me, so

0:14:24.760 --> 0:14:27.440
<v Speaker 1>I'll give you the Andrews one for me. Like one

0:14:27.520 --> 0:14:30.360
<v Speaker 1>of my biggest takeaways coming away from this game is

0:14:30.480 --> 0:14:33.360
<v Speaker 1>just Kendrick Bourne. All the stuff we talked about, you know,

0:14:33.480 --> 0:14:35.280
<v Speaker 1>can he take off this year? Can he have that

0:14:35.320 --> 0:14:37.120
<v Speaker 1>remember that we were talking about, like to break out

0:14:37.240 --> 0:14:39.840
<v Speaker 1>year in year seven? Yeah, kind of like an abstract.

0:14:40.240 --> 0:14:42.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't think there's anything fugazi about what he did

0:14:42.200 --> 0:14:45.240
<v Speaker 1>in this game. He's back. And this is why last

0:14:45.320 --> 0:14:48.280
<v Speaker 1>year I was red in the face saying it's malpractice.

0:14:48.280 --> 0:14:50.280
<v Speaker 1>They're not putting this guy on the field because he

0:14:51.120 --> 0:14:52.920
<v Speaker 1>can change the game. He can change the game. And

0:14:52.960 --> 0:14:57.120
<v Speaker 1>I thought he showed in this game why he makes

0:14:57.120 --> 0:14:58.720
<v Speaker 1>that and he and this is all with him having

0:14:58.720 --> 0:15:00.280
<v Speaker 1>a bad drop. I'm not gonna say he was. He

0:15:00.320 --> 0:15:02.480
<v Speaker 1>should have caught that ball on that third down late

0:15:02.480 --> 0:15:05.840
<v Speaker 1>in the game. That's probably Max's best throw. But there

0:15:05.840 --> 0:15:07.960
<v Speaker 1>were other things as well that cost him the game.

0:15:07.960 --> 0:15:10.360
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't just that. And I thought Bourne was excellent

0:15:10.360 --> 0:15:10.760
<v Speaker 1>in this game.

0:15:11.040 --> 0:15:14.800
<v Speaker 2>I agree with you that I agree with you that

0:15:15.320 --> 0:15:17.920
<v Speaker 2>one hundred and ten percent about last year with Kendrick Bourne.

0:15:18.200 --> 0:15:20.160
<v Speaker 2>I agree with you one hundred and ten percent this

0:15:20.280 --> 0:15:22.520
<v Speaker 2>year that Kendrick Borne needs to be on the field.

0:15:22.600 --> 0:15:26.040
<v Speaker 2>And it Yeah, we said before the season started. I

0:15:26.040 --> 0:15:27.920
<v Speaker 2>think both of us were in lockstep on this on

0:15:27.920 --> 0:15:30.720
<v Speaker 2>one of the previous shows on Catch twenty two that

0:15:30.800 --> 0:15:33.680
<v Speaker 2>we felt like Bourne should be the most targeted receiver

0:15:33.760 --> 0:15:36.680
<v Speaker 2>in the Patriots offense, and nothing that I saw on

0:15:36.720 --> 0:15:42.400
<v Speaker 2>Sunday deters me from that point. I will say he

0:15:42.600 --> 0:15:48.520
<v Speaker 2>has some route running miscues on film that I think,

0:15:48.560 --> 0:15:52.120
<v Speaker 2>in the coach's eyes, probably hold him back a little

0:15:52.120 --> 0:15:54.320
<v Speaker 2>bit from being the guy that we all want him

0:15:54.360 --> 0:15:58.360
<v Speaker 2>to be. But at the same time, I'm not sure

0:15:58.440 --> 0:16:01.800
<v Speaker 2>for this particular football team that that can matter. Like,

0:16:01.880 --> 0:16:04.040
<v Speaker 2>so I would if you want to run guy right,

0:16:04.040 --> 0:16:06.160
<v Speaker 2>because like, if he runs like I think maybe in

0:16:06.200 --> 0:16:08.120
<v Speaker 2>this game he had two or three routes, I would

0:16:08.160 --> 0:16:10.520
<v Speaker 2>say probably two. I think the third one would be

0:16:10.640 --> 0:16:13.240
<v Speaker 2>a nitpick. I'd say there's probably two routes where I

0:16:13.240 --> 0:16:16.920
<v Speaker 2>thought that he ran the route incorrectly, But that doesn't

0:16:17.880 --> 0:16:20.800
<v Speaker 2>wipe out all the routes that he ran great right like,

0:16:21.000 --> 0:16:22.960
<v Speaker 2>and he runs too many good routes to take him.

0:16:22.880 --> 0:16:25.400
<v Speaker 1>Off, And I would just say that was a massive nitpick. Again,

0:16:25.440 --> 0:16:27.360
<v Speaker 1>you're being positive, but great shot with it. No, but

0:16:27.400 --> 0:16:29.360
<v Speaker 1>I would like that it goes back to something we talked

0:16:29.360 --> 0:16:32.160
<v Speaker 1>about the soft steins. If they wanted that guy DeAndre

0:16:32.280 --> 0:16:34.440
<v Speaker 1>Hopkins was available. Yeah, Jerry Judy was real. I mean,

0:16:34.440 --> 0:16:37.600
<v Speaker 1>now you're talking about a top twenty receiver, right if

0:16:37.640 --> 0:16:39.440
<v Speaker 1>the biggest knock on the guys two routes he ran

0:16:39.440 --> 0:16:41.200
<v Speaker 1>over the course of the game, and that's why you

0:16:41.240 --> 0:16:44.120
<v Speaker 1>can't feature him. Can then in the drop, but like

0:16:44.120 --> 0:16:47.160
<v Speaker 1>then you needed to go get Like he's as good

0:16:47.200 --> 0:16:50.320
<v Speaker 1>as they have and he's pretty good. But if you're

0:16:50.320 --> 0:16:53.880
<v Speaker 1>expecting elevation they they clearly felt based off what they

0:16:53.920 --> 0:16:56.120
<v Speaker 1>did in the offseason, I would argue that they don't

0:16:56.120 --> 0:16:58.480
<v Speaker 1>need a receiver better than what Kendrick Bourne did on Sunday.

0:16:58.640 --> 0:17:03.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and I again, I I his miscues are not

0:17:03.160 --> 0:17:04.880
<v Speaker 2>big enough for me to take him off the field

0:17:04.920 --> 0:17:06.760
<v Speaker 2>by any stretch of the imagination, because of how good

0:17:06.800 --> 0:17:09.520
<v Speaker 2>the good plays are with him. But at the end

0:17:09.520 --> 0:17:12.560
<v Speaker 2>of the day, the couple running miscues that he had

0:17:12.600 --> 0:17:15.080
<v Speaker 2>did hurt them, and then obviously the job hurts them. Yeah,

0:17:15.119 --> 0:17:19.280
<v Speaker 2>and that's just I'm with you, that's the difference between But.

0:17:19.200 --> 0:17:21.760
<v Speaker 1>That's not even like I don't want to say it's

0:17:21.760 --> 0:17:24.119
<v Speaker 1>not his fault, but like, that's not he gave you

0:17:24.160 --> 0:17:26.480
<v Speaker 1>as much as you can realistically expect him to give.

0:17:26.680 --> 0:17:29.000
<v Speaker 2>I agree if you want more. That's about the players

0:17:29.000 --> 0:17:31.320
<v Speaker 2>they have. I'm just simply telling you why I didn't

0:17:31.320 --> 0:17:32.080
<v Speaker 2>give him a gold star.

0:17:32.200 --> 0:17:33.040
<v Speaker 1>Okay, that's it.

0:17:33.840 --> 0:17:37.920
<v Speaker 2>So those are my three gold stars. Bill O'Brien, mac

0:17:38.600 --> 0:17:43.439
<v Speaker 2>under pressure, maneuvering pressure, managing pressure, and uh and and

0:17:43.520 --> 0:17:45.440
<v Speaker 2>David Andrews, who I thought was great in this game.

0:17:46.640 --> 0:17:49.879
<v Speaker 2>You mentioned Damario Douglas. I am buying all the to

0:17:49.960 --> 0:17:52.840
<v Speaker 2>Mario Douglas stock. I want Damario Douglas on the field

0:17:52.840 --> 0:17:55.479
<v Speaker 2>as much as possible. I think that he is the

0:17:55.480 --> 0:17:59.360
<v Speaker 2>one guy that is dynamic in this offense besides maybe

0:17:59.440 --> 0:18:02.040
<v Speaker 2>Kendrick that can get open, that can run with the

0:18:02.040 --> 0:18:05.400
<v Speaker 2>football a little bit. I am clamoring, clamoring to see

0:18:05.440 --> 0:18:07.359
<v Speaker 2>him with the football in his hands with some space.

0:18:07.520 --> 0:18:07.760
<v Speaker 1>Yep.

0:18:07.960 --> 0:18:10.360
<v Speaker 2>They unfortunately couldn't get him loose in this game. They

0:18:10.359 --> 0:18:13.760
<v Speaker 2>were close on that throw that Jalen Carter made Max Sale,

0:18:13.760 --> 0:18:16.359
<v Speaker 2>But I think that if they can get him in

0:18:16.440 --> 0:18:20.280
<v Speaker 2>those types of matchups. I really like the Mario Douglas

0:18:20.280 --> 0:18:22.080
<v Speaker 2>and how he ran the routes in this game. One

0:18:22.400 --> 0:18:26.560
<v Speaker 2>one conversion that he didn't run properly, but it's a

0:18:26.640 --> 0:18:28.600
<v Speaker 2>rookie in his first game. I'm not gonna and I'm

0:18:28.600 --> 0:18:30.800
<v Speaker 2>sure there's many more that the coaches know about the DIDO,

0:18:30.960 --> 0:18:36.040
<v Speaker 2>but like, you know whatever, I just similar to Kendrick Bourne. Yeah,

0:18:36.040 --> 0:18:38.160
<v Speaker 2>he's gonna have some mistakes, he's gonna have some growing

0:18:38.200 --> 0:18:40.600
<v Speaker 2>pains as a young player, but he's too good to

0:18:40.680 --> 0:18:41.880
<v Speaker 2>not play him a lot.

0:18:42.160 --> 0:18:45.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, their three bet went once they get healthy. I

0:18:45.040 --> 0:18:47.320
<v Speaker 1>think it's pretty clear at this point. There's been some

0:18:47.440 --> 0:18:50.800
<v Speaker 1>reporting to this points as well. When they're an eleven, Yeah,

0:18:50.840 --> 0:18:56.040
<v Speaker 1>Parker Bourne Pop Pop. That's that's And I know people

0:18:56.080 --> 0:18:58.520
<v Speaker 1>want to knock Kashan Booty in this game too, Like

0:18:58.880 --> 0:19:00.800
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't take him off the field.

0:19:01.080 --> 0:19:02.640
<v Speaker 2>I didn't love Kashan Booty in this game.

0:19:02.720 --> 0:19:06.240
<v Speaker 1>I didn't love him, but I didn't like he belonged.

0:19:06.680 --> 0:19:09.399
<v Speaker 1>If that makes sense, I don't know. I mean he

0:19:09.400 --> 0:19:10.680
<v Speaker 1>doesn't need a true red shirt, like.

0:19:10.640 --> 0:19:13.200
<v Speaker 2>He's No, I don't think he needs a true red shirt.

0:19:13.280 --> 0:19:14.639
<v Speaker 1>But just to get back to we can get into

0:19:14.680 --> 0:19:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Kashan buy because later, because I feel like that changes

0:19:17.200 --> 0:19:19.359
<v Speaker 1>the conversation. But the point being like, when you're an eleven,

0:19:19.720 --> 0:19:23.120
<v Speaker 1>Parker Bourne Pop, that's got to be the group right now,

0:19:23.280 --> 0:19:25.680
<v Speaker 1>Like those are the three best receivers. And I don't

0:19:25.680 --> 0:19:26.440
<v Speaker 1>know that it's close.

0:19:26.800 --> 0:19:28.919
<v Speaker 2>I don't think it is. And I also would just

0:19:28.960 --> 0:19:31.840
<v Speaker 2>say that I like how those three compliment each other.

0:19:31.920 --> 0:19:35.320
<v Speaker 1>Oh, you have a really wide range of skill sets there,

0:19:35.359 --> 0:19:38.360
<v Speaker 1>and no, I think it beyond. That's part of why

0:19:38.359 --> 0:19:43.320
<v Speaker 1>I like it. I think that group elevates, they all

0:19:43.359 --> 0:19:46.320
<v Speaker 1>elevate each other again because of that diverse the diversity

0:19:46.359 --> 0:19:47.280
<v Speaker 1>of skill sets within there.

0:19:47.440 --> 0:19:50.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I really like Douglass in this game. I did.

0:19:51.800 --> 0:19:56.240
<v Speaker 2>So those are my three positives, and we started the

0:19:56.280 --> 0:19:58.120
<v Speaker 2>show there. We're going to open up the phone lines

0:19:58.160 --> 0:20:00.000
<v Speaker 2>here in a second, eight five to five, pats five hundred.

0:20:00.040 --> 0:20:02.440
<v Speaker 2>It is the phone number. Got three people on hold already.

0:20:02.440 --> 0:20:04.600
<v Speaker 2>We're gonna get to you and just a second, I promise.

0:20:05.040 --> 0:20:07.440
<v Speaker 2>I think the one thing I do want to say

0:20:07.440 --> 0:20:09.920
<v Speaker 2>about you know what I said on Tuesday about Mac

0:20:09.960 --> 0:20:12.400
<v Speaker 2>and and just I don't want to beat a dead horse.

0:20:12.480 --> 0:20:15.560
<v Speaker 2>I've already talked about Mac and my my critiques about

0:20:15.560 --> 0:20:18.440
<v Speaker 2>Mac enough, but people that just listen to this show,

0:20:18.600 --> 0:20:22.120
<v Speaker 2>I want them to understand where I'm coming from as well. Right, Yeah,

0:20:22.160 --> 0:20:24.840
<v Speaker 2>and uh, I think the biggest thing with Mac is

0:20:25.040 --> 0:20:28.560
<v Speaker 2>I want to say two things. One, Uh, I want

0:20:28.560 --> 0:20:31.840
<v Speaker 2>Mac Jones to be great. I really do, and I

0:20:31.840 --> 0:20:34.560
<v Speaker 2>think that people now, uh, maybe a little bit more

0:20:34.600 --> 0:20:37.120
<v Speaker 2>publicly than I would like. Yeah, I know that I

0:20:37.160 --> 0:20:39.760
<v Speaker 2>love Mac, Like, Mack's a great guy, and I enjoy

0:20:39.840 --> 0:20:43.280
<v Speaker 2>covering him, and I enjoyed the conversations that I've had

0:20:43.320 --> 0:20:46.119
<v Speaker 2>with him. I'm not we're not friends, Like, I'm not

0:20:46.160 --> 0:20:48.439
<v Speaker 2>saying any of that. I'm just saying like I enjoy

0:20:48.760 --> 0:20:53.040
<v Speaker 2>interacting with Mac. With that being said, where my frustration

0:20:53.200 --> 0:20:56.920
<v Speaker 2>comes from with Mac is I truly do want him

0:20:56.960 --> 0:21:01.160
<v Speaker 2>to be great. But for him to be great, he's

0:21:01.520 --> 0:21:05.639
<v Speaker 2>the little details of the quarterback position, the nuances that

0:21:05.680 --> 0:21:08.280
<v Speaker 2>you get from studying film over and over and again.

0:21:09.560 --> 0:21:12.760
<v Speaker 2>He has to dominate that, Like, he has to be

0:21:12.800 --> 0:21:17.399
<v Speaker 2>really really good at that because he's not going to

0:21:17.600 --> 0:21:23.919
<v Speaker 2>change dramatically from a physical standpoint. So if he's gonna

0:21:23.920 --> 0:21:28.000
<v Speaker 2>be great, then he has to have clean footwork. He

0:21:28.119 --> 0:21:30.520
<v Speaker 2>has to throw from a solid base, he has to

0:21:30.560 --> 0:21:33.120
<v Speaker 2>make good decisions with the football, he has to throw

0:21:33.160 --> 0:21:35.440
<v Speaker 2>on time, Like these are the things that he has

0:21:35.520 --> 0:21:40.879
<v Speaker 2>to do to play with his margins. And my frustration

0:21:41.080 --> 0:21:42.919
<v Speaker 2>comes from when I watch the film and I'm like,

0:21:43.320 --> 0:21:47.080
<v Speaker 2>you're not controlling the controllabulls Mac. You got to be

0:21:47.119 --> 0:21:49.560
<v Speaker 2>able to control the things you can control. He can't

0:21:49.600 --> 0:21:54.239
<v Speaker 2>control the fact that he's not Lamar Jackson, and he

0:21:54.280 --> 0:21:56.400
<v Speaker 2>can't control the fact that he doesn't have it. People

0:21:56.440 --> 0:21:58.399
<v Speaker 2>get mad when I bring up Josh Allen that he

0:21:58.480 --> 0:22:00.200
<v Speaker 2>can't control the fact that he doesn't have an army.

0:22:00.320 --> 0:22:02.200
<v Speaker 1>Can control the he doesn't turn the ball or four times.

0:22:02.520 --> 0:22:05.000
<v Speaker 2>That's why people get mad. He can't control the fact

0:22:05.040 --> 0:22:07.040
<v Speaker 2>that he doesn't have an arm like justin Herbert. He

0:22:07.080 --> 0:22:11.040
<v Speaker 2>can't control that. But what he can control is his

0:22:11.160 --> 0:22:14.280
<v Speaker 2>own individual process and over the course of a game.

0:22:14.800 --> 0:22:18.840
<v Speaker 2>So my frustrations with him come because I'm like, I

0:22:18.880 --> 0:22:21.440
<v Speaker 2>want you to be good, dude, but like you're these

0:22:21.440 --> 0:22:23.800
<v Speaker 2>are the things you're missing right now. And I think

0:22:23.840 --> 0:22:26.600
<v Speaker 2>the main thing from this game that I was concerned with,

0:22:26.920 --> 0:22:30.480
<v Speaker 2>and I'm willing to give him the caveat in the

0:22:30.680 --> 0:22:34.199
<v Speaker 2>and within that caveat give him the time for the

0:22:34.200 --> 0:22:37.879
<v Speaker 2>offensive line to get healthy, is that his footwork being

0:22:38.480 --> 0:22:41.080
<v Speaker 2>off in this game for large stretches might have been

0:22:41.119 --> 0:22:43.720
<v Speaker 2>related to the fact that he was not being protected well.

0:22:43.800 --> 0:22:45.280
<v Speaker 1>So the other thing I would say to that, because

0:22:45.320 --> 0:22:48.320
<v Speaker 1>he his footwork was good as a rookie it's not

0:22:48.480 --> 0:22:51.600
<v Speaker 1>totally new. He this goes back and I know people

0:22:51.600 --> 0:22:53.760
<v Speaker 1>are gonna roll their eyes and see me pointing a

0:22:53.800 --> 0:22:58.359
<v Speaker 1>finger at Matt patric again. But last year, do you

0:22:58.400 --> 0:23:00.359
<v Speaker 1>think he had a coach that when they in and

0:23:00.400 --> 0:23:02.480
<v Speaker 1>broke down the film could get to that level with him?

0:23:02.640 --> 0:23:05.320
<v Speaker 1>No work on that and I and so, yeah.

0:23:05.160 --> 0:23:07.480
<v Speaker 2>Like I wonder, Look, obviously we all would love to

0:23:07.480 --> 0:23:09.360
<v Speaker 2>be a fly on the wall in any of those meetings,

0:23:09.800 --> 0:23:13.320
<v Speaker 2>but I really wonder what the coaches feel about it,

0:23:13.400 --> 0:23:16.199
<v Speaker 2>because the bottom line is is this is where my

0:23:16.280 --> 0:23:20.520
<v Speaker 2>concern came on Tuesday, is that when he doesn't throw

0:23:20.600 --> 0:23:23.840
<v Speaker 2>from a solid base, he doesn't throw at a ton

0:23:23.840 --> 0:23:24.040
<v Speaker 2>of all.

0:23:24.280 --> 0:23:25.840
<v Speaker 1>And look, I'm sure he knows that, and I'm sure

0:23:25.840 --> 0:23:28.080
<v Speaker 1>the coaches know that. And it's not like they just

0:23:28.119 --> 0:23:29.919
<v Speaker 1>got out here, right, they had camp and all of that,

0:23:30.000 --> 0:23:32.520
<v Speaker 1>But a game environment changes things. Like he was I

0:23:32.560 --> 0:23:34.159
<v Speaker 1>thought during camp he was doing a good job of

0:23:34.160 --> 0:23:35.960
<v Speaker 1>setting the feet and all that, right, And you I

0:23:35.960 --> 0:23:38.880
<v Speaker 1>think you agree with me on that. Yeah, I don't

0:23:38.880 --> 0:23:40.240
<v Speaker 1>know that there was somebody that was going to go

0:23:40.240 --> 0:23:41.880
<v Speaker 1>to him in last year, last year and say, hey,

0:23:41.880 --> 0:23:43.880
<v Speaker 1>this is kind of a mess. Yeah, And I think

0:23:43.880 --> 0:23:45.760
<v Speaker 1>he developed some bad habits, and I think when you're

0:23:45.800 --> 0:23:48.440
<v Speaker 1>down two starting guards, maybe someone last year started creeping

0:23:48.440 --> 0:23:49.440
<v Speaker 1>in the back of his head like I'm going to

0:23:49.480 --> 0:23:51.200
<v Speaker 1>take a beating today. We all thought that in the

0:23:51.200 --> 0:23:52.800
<v Speaker 1>press box. We were talking about like, he's not going

0:23:52.840 --> 0:23:54.640
<v Speaker 1>to make it through this game. Yeah, with two rookie

0:23:54.680 --> 0:23:57.040
<v Speaker 1>guards against his defensive line. Yeah, Like you mentioned, Bill

0:23:57.080 --> 0:23:58.719
<v Speaker 1>O'Brien did a great job kind of helped him out,

0:23:58.720 --> 0:24:01.880
<v Speaker 1>and he did a fantastic job himself of keeping himself clean.

0:24:01.920 --> 0:24:03.160
<v Speaker 1>But I think that was part of it. I think

0:24:03.160 --> 0:24:06.639
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot he's thinking about in this game, specifically

0:24:06.640 --> 0:24:10.560
<v Speaker 1>beyond mechanics. I look at it and say, all right, yeah, look,

0:24:10.680 --> 0:24:12.760
<v Speaker 1>I thought Mac was better than you're giving him credit

0:24:12.840 --> 0:24:15.479
<v Speaker 1>for in this game. I think if that's Mac Jones'

0:24:15.480 --> 0:24:19.160
<v Speaker 1>worst performance of the year, this team's making the playoffs.

0:24:19.240 --> 0:24:22.639
<v Speaker 1>I'll say that right now. Or if Mac Jones playing

0:24:22.680 --> 0:24:25.000
<v Speaker 1>that way to that level is their biggest problem, and

0:24:25.040 --> 0:24:27.760
<v Speaker 1>they have no bigger problems than Mac Jones performing like

0:24:27.760 --> 0:24:29.320
<v Speaker 1>he did on Sunday, when again he threw for three

0:24:29.359 --> 0:24:31.760
<v Speaker 1>hundred yards and three touchdowns against the top ten defense

0:24:31.800 --> 0:24:34.280
<v Speaker 1>in the league. If that's their biggest problem, they're gonna

0:24:34.280 --> 0:24:37.040
<v Speaker 1>make the playoffs and that's good. Now maybe it's not.

0:24:37.160 --> 0:24:41.520
<v Speaker 1>Maybe it gets worse. Can the coaching staff fix those

0:24:41.560 --> 0:24:43.480
<v Speaker 1>little things that you're talking about, and can him and

0:24:43.520 --> 0:24:45.800
<v Speaker 1>Bill O'Brien get in the lab and basically does he

0:24:45.880 --> 0:24:47.960
<v Speaker 1>go in there? He was hard on himself after the game,

0:24:48.040 --> 0:24:50.520
<v Speaker 1>so I think he knows what you're saying. Yeah, can

0:24:50.560 --> 0:24:51.919
<v Speaker 1>they go in the room and say we need to

0:24:51.920 --> 0:24:53.800
<v Speaker 1>fix A, B and C and then come out on

0:24:53.800 --> 0:24:56.560
<v Speaker 1>Sunday night and A, B and C are fixed? And

0:24:56.600 --> 0:24:59.080
<v Speaker 1>this to me, when it relate, whether it relates to Mac,

0:24:59.280 --> 0:25:00.960
<v Speaker 1>whether it relates to the the offense, whether it relate

0:25:01.040 --> 0:25:04.320
<v Speaker 1>to some of the coaching decisions, this is the great Uh.

0:25:05.000 --> 0:25:07.680
<v Speaker 1>This game was weird in terms of having to sit

0:25:07.760 --> 0:25:10.119
<v Speaker 1>up there and evaluate it. I wrote like three different

0:25:10.160 --> 0:25:12.240
<v Speaker 1>columns because I didn't like them, and I kept having

0:25:12.280 --> 0:25:15.320
<v Speaker 1>to scrap them because I think this feels people are

0:25:15.359 --> 0:25:19.040
<v Speaker 1>gonna hear this as a fence sitting take. I will no,

0:25:19.359 --> 0:25:23.720
<v Speaker 1>but it's not. It's not. There wasn't because the Patriots

0:25:23.720 --> 0:25:28.720
<v Speaker 1>played such a polarized game. Whatever your preconceived notion was

0:25:28.760 --> 0:25:31.720
<v Speaker 1>about the team going into that game, you have something

0:25:31.720 --> 0:25:34.240
<v Speaker 1>to point to and say it was true. If you

0:25:34.400 --> 0:25:36.960
<v Speaker 1>want to sit here and say, hey, Bill O'Brien's here,

0:25:37.240 --> 0:25:39.760
<v Speaker 1>the offense looked different. They moved the ball against this

0:25:39.800 --> 0:25:41.639
<v Speaker 1>good defense at times, and hey, it's the you know,

0:25:41.680 --> 0:25:44.640
<v Speaker 1>defending NFC champion. It wasn't gonna be perfect. I think

0:25:44.640 --> 0:25:47.280
<v Speaker 1>that's a perfectly valid take. And you could sit here

0:25:47.320 --> 0:25:49.320
<v Speaker 1>and say the issues they had, and I believe this,

0:25:49.880 --> 0:25:53.439
<v Speaker 1>the issues they had, while similar to the issues they

0:25:53.440 --> 0:25:56.639
<v Speaker 1>had last year, the problem last year wasn't that they

0:25:56.680 --> 0:25:59.479
<v Speaker 1>were making those issues in September. A lot of teams

0:25:59.520 --> 0:26:02.160
<v Speaker 1>make similar mistakes to the ones they made in September.

0:26:02.520 --> 0:26:04.840
<v Speaker 1>The problem was they were still making them in December.

0:26:04.960 --> 0:26:07.240
<v Speaker 1>They never got fixed. And that was the case last year.

0:26:07.280 --> 0:26:08.560
<v Speaker 1>It was the case the year before that, it was

0:26:08.600 --> 0:26:11.399
<v Speaker 1>the case the year before that. So you're absolutely allowed

0:26:11.400 --> 0:26:13.560
<v Speaker 1>to sit here and say I saw a lot from

0:26:13.560 --> 0:26:15.679
<v Speaker 1>that game that I liked. I saw a lot that

0:26:15.680 --> 0:26:19.760
<v Speaker 1>looks like progress. Yeah, it wasn't perfect, but to go

0:26:19.880 --> 0:26:22.200
<v Speaker 1>toe to toe with the defending NFC champion in Week

0:26:22.320 --> 0:26:24.439
<v Speaker 1>one and have time to build on that with the

0:26:24.440 --> 0:26:28.000
<v Speaker 1>new coaching staff, I'm encouraged. At the same time, I

0:26:28.040 --> 0:26:31.680
<v Speaker 1>do think it's fair to say yes, but we felt

0:26:31.760 --> 0:26:34.240
<v Speaker 1>encouraged in twenty twenty early in the season. We felt

0:26:34.320 --> 0:26:36.480
<v Speaker 1>encouraged in twenty twenty one early in the season. Even

0:26:36.600 --> 0:26:38.960
<v Speaker 1>last year early on, there were some moments where we

0:26:38.960 --> 0:26:41.239
<v Speaker 1>were like, Okay, here we go, let's see and then

0:26:42.440 --> 0:26:45.800
<v Speaker 1>So it's not a moral victory thing though, No, it's

0:26:45.840 --> 0:26:49.080
<v Speaker 1>a benefit of the doubt thing in a bubble. Listen,

0:26:49.119 --> 0:26:51.639
<v Speaker 1>just let me finish it. Let me finish in a bubble.

0:26:52.000 --> 0:26:56.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm young team, third year quarterback coming off a year

0:26:56.040 --> 0:26:58.560
<v Speaker 1>they missed the playoffs, goes toe to toe with the

0:26:58.600 --> 0:27:02.119
<v Speaker 1>defending NFC champion. I think a lot of with making

0:27:02.320 --> 0:27:04.480
<v Speaker 1>mistakes that are pretty textbook to make early in the year.

0:27:04.760 --> 0:27:06.719
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of teams you would look at

0:27:06.760 --> 0:27:09.840
<v Speaker 1>that and a lot of circumstances and say, there's something

0:27:09.840 --> 0:27:12.120
<v Speaker 1>to build on here. It's not a moral victory. Think

0:27:12.119 --> 0:27:14.400
<v Speaker 1>it's not necessarily feel great about it, but it's when

0:27:14.400 --> 0:27:16.960
<v Speaker 1>we're projecting out over the course of a seventeen game season,

0:27:17.400 --> 0:27:20.160
<v Speaker 1>if the things that usually get fixed across the league

0:27:20.160 --> 0:27:22.480
<v Speaker 1>by teams get fixed, they'll be in a good spot.

0:27:22.560 --> 0:27:25.120
<v Speaker 1>I think that's an absolutely fair evaluation of this game.

0:27:25.560 --> 0:27:28.679
<v Speaker 1>But you can also bring in the caveat that we

0:27:28.800 --> 0:27:30.800
<v Speaker 1>felt that way about this team in twenty twenty and

0:27:30.840 --> 0:27:33.000
<v Speaker 1>they never made the fixes they needed to make. We

0:27:33.080 --> 0:27:34.920
<v Speaker 1>felt this way about the team in twenty twenty one,

0:27:34.960 --> 0:27:37.320
<v Speaker 1>and they never made the fixes they needed to make. Obviously,

0:27:37.440 --> 0:27:39.600
<v Speaker 1>last year they never made the fixes they needed to make.

0:27:39.680 --> 0:27:44.280
<v Speaker 1>So our Bill and O'Brien and Adrian Clem that much

0:27:44.359 --> 0:27:49.159
<v Speaker 1>better that Obviously they're better than Patricia. But like the

0:27:49.240 --> 0:27:53.159
<v Speaker 1>McDaniel statts in twenty and twenty one, are are Patricia?

0:27:53.359 --> 0:27:58.400
<v Speaker 1>Are mcdan the third try? Are O'Brien and Clem?

0:27:58.640 --> 0:27:59.640
<v Speaker 2>Yes worth?

0:27:59.720 --> 0:28:02.440
<v Speaker 1>The best benefit of the doubt that not only can

0:28:02.480 --> 0:28:04.480
<v Speaker 1>you look at it and say they are going to

0:28:04.520 --> 0:28:07.960
<v Speaker 1>fix these things, but say they are going to fix

0:28:08.000 --> 0:28:10.080
<v Speaker 1>these things that they haven't been able to fix in

0:28:10.200 --> 0:28:13.520
<v Speaker 1>each of the last three years. That's essentially the question

0:28:13.640 --> 0:28:15.560
<v Speaker 1>me coming away from this game. Are you taking the

0:28:15.600 --> 0:28:17.480
<v Speaker 1>cheese on it? Are you going to after what we've

0:28:17.480 --> 0:28:19.399
<v Speaker 1>been through the last three years of them falling apart

0:28:19.480 --> 0:28:21.840
<v Speaker 1>November and December? Are you still willing to look at

0:28:21.840 --> 0:28:24.640
<v Speaker 1>this and say it'll look better by Thanksgiving, it'll look

0:28:24.680 --> 0:28:26.560
<v Speaker 1>better by Christmas than it does now.

0:28:27.200 --> 0:28:29.640
<v Speaker 2>That's a fair take. I don't disagree with a lot

0:28:29.680 --> 0:28:33.920
<v Speaker 2>of that I think where my bigger concern came from.

0:28:33.960 --> 0:28:36.000
<v Speaker 2>I guess from this game. Because I can nitpick mac

0:28:36.080 --> 0:28:37.720
<v Speaker 2>Jones all day long, I'm not going to do it.

0:28:38.280 --> 0:28:39.960
<v Speaker 2>You know. There's little things with his footwork that I

0:28:40.000 --> 0:28:42.720
<v Speaker 2>didn't like, especially throwing the ball to his right. I

0:28:42.760 --> 0:28:45.320
<v Speaker 2>thought that throwing to the ball to the right sideline,

0:28:45.600 --> 0:28:47.960
<v Speaker 2>the ball died on the mall game long, and that

0:28:48.520 --> 0:28:51.240
<v Speaker 2>it was footwork related to me. Like I think because

0:28:52.000 --> 0:28:54.640
<v Speaker 2>for him, and like I said earlier, like he needs

0:28:54.680 --> 0:28:57.239
<v Speaker 2>to have a solid base and solid footwork for him

0:28:57.240 --> 0:29:01.000
<v Speaker 2>to generate velocity. He can't generate a velocity of platform. Yeah,

0:29:01.160 --> 0:29:03.600
<v Speaker 2>so he has to have a solid platform to throw from.

0:29:03.800 --> 0:29:06.040
<v Speaker 2>So I think that that's where a lot of my

0:29:07.600 --> 0:29:10.200
<v Speaker 2>concerns came from. The other concern that I had in

0:29:10.240 --> 0:29:13.920
<v Speaker 2>this game was, like you said, coming into the year,

0:29:13.960 --> 0:29:17.840
<v Speaker 2>confirming a prior, and my prior was now when the

0:29:17.920 --> 0:29:21.040
<v Speaker 2>chips were down and it was the fourth quarter, and

0:29:21.760 --> 0:29:26.680
<v Speaker 2>Bill O'Brien can only take you so far because it

0:29:26.800 --> 0:29:29.520
<v Speaker 2>ultimately comes down to the players on the field winning

0:29:29.520 --> 0:29:35.080
<v Speaker 2>a game for you. I did not think offensively, not offensively,

0:29:35.320 --> 0:29:38.760
<v Speaker 2>not just Mac Jones, the entire offense. I did not

0:29:38.880 --> 0:29:41.320
<v Speaker 2>think that they had enough talent to win those games.

0:29:41.360 --> 0:29:44.200
<v Speaker 1>So I guess this goes back to my point. I

0:29:44.200 --> 0:29:46.400
<v Speaker 1>think some people will just agree with you. Flat some

0:29:46.440 --> 0:29:50.080
<v Speaker 1>people will say, look, it was no secret that the

0:29:50.120 --> 0:29:52.520
<v Speaker 1>Eagles defense had more talent than they did on offense.

0:29:52.520 --> 0:29:54.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how many teams in the league have

0:29:54.720 --> 0:29:56.680
<v Speaker 1>more talent on offense than the Eagles do on defense.

0:29:56.720 --> 0:29:59.640
<v Speaker 1>It's a very short list. Yeah, I think some people

0:29:59.640 --> 0:30:01.720
<v Speaker 1>look at that and say, this one they didn't win.

0:30:02.080 --> 0:30:06.800
<v Speaker 1>But more often than not, in that situation, Bill O'Brien

0:30:06.840 --> 0:30:08.440
<v Speaker 1>will be the difference that they will be able. And

0:30:08.640 --> 0:30:10.120
<v Speaker 1>you have the stat was it owen thirteen?

0:30:10.320 --> 0:30:14.200
<v Speaker 2>Right? Oh? And twelve in in uh twenty five plus

0:30:14.240 --> 0:30:15.400
<v Speaker 2>points games? No.

0:30:15.480 --> 0:30:17.880
<v Speaker 1>The other one the game leading drive on he has

0:30:17.960 --> 0:30:19.520
<v Speaker 1>one in thirty three, one and thirty three.

0:30:19.600 --> 0:30:19.920
<v Speaker 2>Okay.

0:30:20.280 --> 0:30:21.920
<v Speaker 1>I think some people look at it and say, Bill

0:30:21.920 --> 0:30:25.280
<v Speaker 1>O'Brien's gond increase that number in this one specific instance,

0:30:25.320 --> 0:30:28.040
<v Speaker 1>he didn't. Yeah, and it's against a very good defense.

0:30:28.160 --> 0:30:30.600
<v Speaker 1>But let's see them get in that situation against Miami.

0:30:30.640 --> 0:30:32.120
<v Speaker 1>Let's se him geting that situation against some of the

0:30:32.120 --> 0:30:34.360
<v Speaker 1>other teams on their schedule that aren't as good defensively

0:30:34.440 --> 0:30:37.280
<v Speaker 1>and it may not go from one to thirty three

0:30:37.320 --> 0:30:40.240
<v Speaker 1>to thirty three and one, but or thirty three for

0:30:40.240 --> 0:30:43.000
<v Speaker 1>thirty three or whatever. But like and it doesn't need

0:30:43.040 --> 0:30:45.040
<v Speaker 1>to it needs to be about five hundred. But so again,

0:30:45.520 --> 0:30:47.680
<v Speaker 1>is Bill O'Brien gonna fix it? There's another number. I

0:30:47.680 --> 0:30:48.800
<v Speaker 1>gotta find the stat I.

0:30:48.760 --> 0:30:50.280
<v Speaker 2>Just don't know if Bill O'Brien's enough.

0:30:50.560 --> 0:30:54.479
<v Speaker 1>And that's where so and that's that's basically what the

0:30:54.600 --> 0:30:58.080
<v Speaker 1>question is. I think coming away from this game, it

0:30:58.120 --> 0:31:00.600
<v Speaker 1>was the first week Bill O'Brien had to work with them,

0:31:00.640 --> 0:31:02.080
<v Speaker 1>and there's I think you'd agree with me on this

0:31:02.160 --> 0:31:04.560
<v Speaker 1>any new coach. And we were actually arguing about how

0:31:04.600 --> 0:31:06.520
<v Speaker 1>much of a difference a new coach makes before the show,

0:31:06.560 --> 0:31:09.040
<v Speaker 1>So I know you're with me on this. Any new coach,

0:31:09.080 --> 0:31:11.360
<v Speaker 1>you need a game or two to really get things fixed, right,

0:31:11.680 --> 0:31:13.800
<v Speaker 1>So I think the argument is all right. Here we

0:31:13.800 --> 0:31:16.040
<v Speaker 1>are with this team again. It was promising, but it

0:31:16.080 --> 0:31:18.520
<v Speaker 1>definitely wasn't perfect. It was good but not good enough.

0:31:19.240 --> 0:31:20.920
<v Speaker 1>Is Bill O'Brien the guy to get them to good

0:31:21.000 --> 0:31:23.760
<v Speaker 1>enough from where they started on Sunday?

0:31:23.840 --> 0:31:26.360
<v Speaker 2>So I don't disagree with anything that.

0:31:26.280 --> 0:31:28.200
<v Speaker 1>You just let me make one more point on top

0:31:28.240 --> 0:31:31.239
<v Speaker 1>of it. I think that the counter to that is

0:31:31.360 --> 0:31:35.280
<v Speaker 1>people talk about, you know, one one in the twenty

0:31:35.360 --> 0:31:37.040
<v Speaker 1>So this is the twenty five points thing, scoring more

0:31:37.120 --> 0:31:39.320
<v Speaker 1>when the opponent scores more than twenty five points. What

0:31:39.440 --> 0:31:41.800
<v Speaker 1>was the number again? Oh and twelve with mac Jones,

0:31:43.720 --> 0:31:48.360
<v Speaker 1>they are without Tom Brady three and twenty five. So

0:31:48.400 --> 0:31:53.200
<v Speaker 1>it's without Tom Brady or Randy Moss. Because of those

0:31:53.240 --> 0:31:55.440
<v Speaker 1>three wins, two of them happened in two thousand and eight.

0:31:56.760 --> 0:32:00.840
<v Speaker 1>They're one in twenty five, one in they won such

0:32:00.840 --> 0:32:03.560
<v Speaker 1>win basically without Tom Brady Randy Moss. Is it a

0:32:03.680 --> 0:32:07.280
<v Speaker 1>mac Jones problem or is it a because if it's

0:32:07.280 --> 0:32:10.400
<v Speaker 1>a mac Jones problem, maybe Bill Obriant can fix it. Yeah,

0:32:10.640 --> 0:32:13.960
<v Speaker 1>if it's a Bill Belichick problem, right, I don't know

0:32:13.960 --> 0:32:14.680
<v Speaker 1>how much it helps.

0:32:15.080 --> 0:32:16.960
<v Speaker 2>It's gonna give it, so that that's kind of where

0:32:16.960 --> 0:32:19.440
<v Speaker 2>I was headed with it. Yeah, when we say Bill

0:32:19.440 --> 0:32:21.840
<v Speaker 2>Belichick problem, we mean a roster construction problem.

0:32:21.880 --> 0:32:24.160
<v Speaker 1>Well, could be a roster construction problem or like a

0:32:24.200 --> 0:32:26.120
<v Speaker 1>game approach philosophy problem.

0:32:25.800 --> 0:32:28.800
<v Speaker 2>But I think the main thing is roster construction. Game Like,

0:32:28.800 --> 0:32:31.880
<v Speaker 2>I think they're both together when I say Bill is

0:32:31.920 --> 0:32:33.880
<v Speaker 2>trying to win the game. In my mind, twenty four

0:32:33.880 --> 0:32:37.240
<v Speaker 2>to twenty right, like he's trying to get he's trying

0:32:37.240 --> 0:32:39.200
<v Speaker 2>to build on defense to the point where you're not

0:32:39.280 --> 0:32:40.040
<v Speaker 2>going to score, right.

0:32:40.080 --> 0:32:42.600
<v Speaker 1>I think Bill might say points, Bill might say truth here,

0:32:42.640 --> 0:32:44.600
<v Speaker 1>and Bill Belichick here. If you allow twenty five points,

0:32:44.640 --> 0:32:46.600
<v Speaker 1>you've already lost that kind of thing exactly.

0:32:46.960 --> 0:32:51.520
<v Speaker 2>So to that point, the play that really put me

0:32:51.600 --> 0:32:53.960
<v Speaker 2>over the edge and led to a Tuesday's show and

0:32:54.000 --> 0:32:56.640
<v Speaker 2>all this this crap that I've taken. The play that

0:32:56.680 --> 0:32:59.440
<v Speaker 2>really put me over the edge was the fourth and

0:32:59.480 --> 0:33:02.320
<v Speaker 2>three play on the second to last drive of the

0:33:02.320 --> 0:33:06.960
<v Speaker 2>game for the Patriots, because on fourth and three they

0:33:08.560 --> 0:33:11.160
<v Speaker 2>I believe they emptied the backfield on it. It might

0:33:11.200 --> 0:33:14.680
<v Speaker 2>have been one back regardless, Mac and the gun, and

0:33:14.720 --> 0:33:19.280
<v Speaker 2>they have Juju in the left slot there. That's your guy, right,

0:33:19.320 --> 0:33:21.920
<v Speaker 2>like that's your big money offseason free agent edition. We'll

0:33:21.920 --> 0:33:25.480
<v Speaker 2>get it apparently, but that's supposed to be your guy, right.

0:33:26.320 --> 0:33:31.920
<v Speaker 2>And the initial read on the play is Juju on

0:33:32.040 --> 0:33:35.600
<v Speaker 2>an option route, run it and get open. He doesn't

0:33:35.640 --> 0:33:38.160
<v Speaker 2>have to break any particular way. He doesn't have to.

0:33:38.520 --> 0:33:41.800
<v Speaker 2>It's not a you know, a leverage read necessarily, it's

0:33:41.960 --> 0:33:46.800
<v Speaker 2>just make your guy miss, right, Just get open on

0:33:46.840 --> 0:33:49.520
<v Speaker 2>the route. So that's that's the guy you paid twelve

0:33:49.520 --> 0:33:51.560
<v Speaker 2>million dollars a year or two to get open on

0:33:51.600 --> 0:33:56.160
<v Speaker 2>this route. And the initial nitpick or not even a nitpick.

0:33:56.200 --> 0:33:58.840
<v Speaker 2>This was just a bad play for the team. The

0:33:58.880 --> 0:34:04.920
<v Speaker 2>initial hiccup is that Juju just doesn't get open. He

0:34:04.960 --> 0:34:07.680
<v Speaker 2>gets suffocated off the line of scrimmage and doesn't get open.

0:34:08.560 --> 0:34:11.600
<v Speaker 2>So at that point Mac has to come off his

0:34:11.680 --> 0:34:15.279
<v Speaker 2>first read and make something happen out of it. And

0:34:15.320 --> 0:34:18.719
<v Speaker 2>then there's pressure, right, So here's the second problem with

0:34:18.800 --> 0:34:21.600
<v Speaker 2>the play is the pressure. So MATC comes off the

0:34:21.640 --> 0:34:23.719
<v Speaker 2>first read, tries to get over to the other side

0:34:23.760 --> 0:34:25.800
<v Speaker 2>of the field to the second and now there's pressure

0:34:25.800 --> 0:34:29.000
<v Speaker 2>in his face, which you and I are both on

0:34:29.040 --> 0:34:34.279
<v Speaker 2>the record numerous times talking about the short fallings in

0:34:34.320 --> 0:34:38.439
<v Speaker 2>the offseason about offensive line personnel. Yeah, here you go,

0:34:39.120 --> 0:34:42.239
<v Speaker 2>your rear in your head, right, So your twelve dollars

0:34:42.239 --> 0:34:44.759
<v Speaker 2>million dollar receiver can't get open on a one on

0:34:44.760 --> 0:34:46.960
<v Speaker 2>one when you created a matchup for him out of

0:34:47.000 --> 0:34:49.880
<v Speaker 2>the slot on fourth and three to get four yards,

0:34:49.880 --> 0:34:50.680
<v Speaker 2>he can't get open.

0:34:51.120 --> 0:34:51.239
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:34:51.719 --> 0:34:54.480
<v Speaker 2>Then your quarterback goes to move off of it correctly

0:34:55.040 --> 0:34:57.439
<v Speaker 2>and he can't get to the second read without there

0:34:57.480 --> 0:35:00.479
<v Speaker 2>being three people in his face. Right, and Maac breaks

0:35:00.520 --> 0:35:03.520
<v Speaker 2>the pocket. Good job, right, gets out of the pocket,

0:35:03.520 --> 0:35:06.200
<v Speaker 2>gets out of the pressure. As he's rolling to his

0:35:06.360 --> 0:35:12.280
<v Speaker 2>right out of the pressure, Kendrick Bourne is streaking across

0:35:12.280 --> 0:35:16.680
<v Speaker 2>the field on a crosser and he's wide af open,

0:35:17.480 --> 0:35:21.080
<v Speaker 2>wide af open behind the linebacker. And this is not

0:35:21.239 --> 0:35:24.960
<v Speaker 2>one of those like Mahomes fifty yard right now, wrist

0:35:25.120 --> 0:35:27.399
<v Speaker 2>like eight or nine yards Dounfield's. It's a ten yard

0:35:27.480 --> 0:35:30.080
<v Speaker 2>throw maybe. And you can throw it with touch like

0:35:30.120 --> 0:35:31.960
<v Speaker 2>you can loft it like you don't. He doesn't even

0:35:32.000 --> 0:35:34.320
<v Speaker 2>need to drive it into any hole. He's not fitting

0:35:34.320 --> 0:35:35.040
<v Speaker 2>it into a window.

0:35:35.200 --> 0:35:35.279
<v Speaker 3>No.

0:35:35.920 --> 0:35:39.480
<v Speaker 2>All he's gotta do is layer it over the linebacker,

0:35:40.239 --> 0:35:42.440
<v Speaker 2>puts a mayror under it to let Kendrick Bouran run

0:35:42.560 --> 0:35:47.480
<v Speaker 2>underneath it, and just feather it over the linebacker. I

0:35:47.480 --> 0:35:49.120
<v Speaker 2>think I sent you the play. I'm sure you've watched

0:35:49.120 --> 0:35:51.799
<v Speaker 2>it on your own, Alex. I promise you that if

0:35:51.800 --> 0:35:53.720
<v Speaker 2>he makes that throw, it's a touchdown.

0:35:54.520 --> 0:35:54.759
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:35:54.880 --> 0:35:57.600
<v Speaker 2>Kendrick Bournan is gonna run under it. There's nobody there

0:35:57.640 --> 0:35:59.600
<v Speaker 2>to stop him, and he's gonna score a touch on

0:35:59.640 --> 0:36:01.160
<v Speaker 2>the seat in the middle of the field.

0:36:01.200 --> 0:36:03.919
<v Speaker 1>It was a misthrow. Again, I'm I think you're being

0:36:04.160 --> 0:36:06.160
<v Speaker 1>You've been too critical on Mac this week, But I'm

0:36:06.200 --> 0:36:07.640
<v Speaker 1>not gonna say he was perfect and that was a

0:36:07.640 --> 0:36:08.440
<v Speaker 1>missed opportunity.

0:36:08.520 --> 0:36:11.160
<v Speaker 2>So instead, what happens is is Mac kind of panics

0:36:11.520 --> 0:36:14.480
<v Speaker 2>frankly and takes a sack on the play instead of

0:36:14.480 --> 0:36:17.600
<v Speaker 2>making the throw. And those three boxes, to me, are

0:36:17.800 --> 0:36:20.920
<v Speaker 2>the Patriots in a nutshell right now. They don't have

0:36:20.960 --> 0:36:25.200
<v Speaker 2>a good enough receiver to win the one on one Juju, Yeah,

0:36:25.239 --> 0:36:27.120
<v Speaker 2>they don't have a good enough offensive line for the

0:36:27.160 --> 0:36:30.320
<v Speaker 2>quarterback to go through the progression. And then Mac Jones

0:36:30.400 --> 0:36:34.040
<v Speaker 2>is not a play creator. He's not a second reaction

0:36:34.239 --> 0:36:37.680
<v Speaker 2>extended play creator outside the pocket. And so if you

0:36:38.200 --> 0:36:41.279
<v Speaker 2>are xing off all three of those boxes all at

0:36:41.280 --> 0:36:44.480
<v Speaker 2>once in a critical moment, you're gonna get what happened

0:36:44.520 --> 0:36:44.759
<v Speaker 2>on Sun.

0:36:44.920 --> 0:36:48.840
<v Speaker 1>And just just for the record, you can work around

0:36:48.920 --> 0:36:51.839
<v Speaker 1>one of those things, the offensive line well, and any

0:36:51.880 --> 0:36:53.680
<v Speaker 1>of them, I'm saying, like you you can.

0:36:53.840 --> 0:36:55.000
<v Speaker 2>There is really tough.

0:36:55.040 --> 0:36:57.600
<v Speaker 1>You don't have to have all three. Basically, don't have

0:36:57.760 --> 0:36:58.360
<v Speaker 1>all three.

0:36:58.560 --> 0:37:01.440
<v Speaker 2>But if you don't have a money winner, like if

0:37:01.440 --> 0:37:03.719
<v Speaker 2>you don't have like a guy that when it is

0:37:03.760 --> 0:37:07.759
<v Speaker 2>an absolute need to have it down. If you don't

0:37:07.760 --> 0:37:10.920
<v Speaker 2>have a receiver that the quarterback can go to, it's hard.

0:37:11.280 --> 0:37:12.839
<v Speaker 1>No, But but this is what I'm saying, Like, if

0:37:12.880 --> 0:37:18.200
<v Speaker 1>you have one of those three things, you're in good shape.

0:37:18.200 --> 0:37:19.719
<v Speaker 1>I think if you have if you have two of

0:37:19.760 --> 0:37:21.839
<v Speaker 1>good three, you're you're you're pretty cooking, right.

0:37:21.840 --> 0:37:22.680
<v Speaker 2>But they don't have that.

0:37:22.719 --> 0:37:24.879
<v Speaker 1>They don't have. But that's my So I think you

0:37:24.920 --> 0:37:29.200
<v Speaker 1>say that, and I'm just like translating here and I'm

0:37:29.239 --> 0:37:31.359
<v Speaker 1>not disagreeing with you, but it's like you say that,

0:37:31.400 --> 0:37:33.000
<v Speaker 1>like they didn't check any of these three boxes. They

0:37:33.000 --> 0:37:35.360
<v Speaker 1>don't have anyse three things, and people like, oh no,

0:37:35.600 --> 0:37:38.959
<v Speaker 1>blow it up, Like, yeah, you don't necessarily need all

0:37:39.000 --> 0:37:41.200
<v Speaker 1>of those threes exactly right, this is my point.

0:37:41.280 --> 0:37:44.759
<v Speaker 2>And so yes, this is exactly my point. So this

0:37:44.800 --> 0:37:46.880
<v Speaker 2>is my whole take on this, right, And this is

0:37:46.920 --> 0:37:53.080
<v Speaker 2>exactly my point. If you had a receiver, if you

0:37:53.200 --> 0:37:56.440
<v Speaker 2>handed aj Brown a Patriot jersey on Sunday and you

0:37:56.480 --> 0:37:58.440
<v Speaker 2>had a receiver that could win that route out of

0:37:58.480 --> 0:37:59.800
<v Speaker 2>the slot, then you're golden.

0:37:59.840 --> 0:38:01.719
<v Speaker 1>Then right, then none of the other two things don't

0:38:01.719 --> 0:38:02.640
<v Speaker 1>come into into play.

0:38:02.640 --> 0:38:04.960
<v Speaker 2>Play. If you had an offensive line that allowed mac

0:38:05.000 --> 0:38:07.640
<v Speaker 2>John's to go through the progression. Then he hits Kendrick

0:38:07.680 --> 0:38:10.040
<v Speaker 2>Bourne from the pocket with a touchdown on the other

0:38:10.120 --> 0:38:13.080
<v Speaker 2>side of the field instead of having to move right.

0:38:13.280 --> 0:38:17.239
<v Speaker 2>If you had a quarterback that was a wizard when

0:38:17.239 --> 0:38:20.480
<v Speaker 2>the play breaks down, then you would have had another

0:38:20.520 --> 0:38:23.319
<v Speaker 2>touchdo right, right, But they struck out on all three.

0:38:23.400 --> 0:38:25.359
<v Speaker 1>So like and there were good teams Like I would say,

0:38:25.400 --> 0:38:27.320
<v Speaker 1>the Chiefs don't have all three of those things, No,

0:38:27.480 --> 0:38:29.880
<v Speaker 1>but they have Patrick, right, But that's the point. Or

0:38:30.200 --> 0:38:32.279
<v Speaker 1>the Niners don't have all three of those things.

0:38:32.760 --> 0:38:35.000
<v Speaker 2>They have two of three. They have the offensive line,

0:38:35.040 --> 0:38:35.520
<v Speaker 2>they have the receiver.

0:38:35.640 --> 0:38:37.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but some people would hear that and say, if

0:38:37.040 --> 0:38:38.719
<v Speaker 1>you don't have the quarterbacks to qualify, And that's just

0:38:38.760 --> 0:38:40.600
<v Speaker 1>the point of trying to prove, like there's ways to

0:38:40.600 --> 0:38:43.040
<v Speaker 1>make it work. And this is why we were pounding

0:38:43.040 --> 0:38:45.200
<v Speaker 1>the table for Jerry Judy, this is why we were

0:38:45.239 --> 0:38:49.280
<v Speaker 1>pounding the table for DeAndre Hopkins because we talked about

0:38:49.320 --> 0:38:51.840
<v Speaker 1>after those moves ev in this offseason, what was the plan.

0:38:52.280 --> 0:38:56.360
<v Speaker 1>The plan was they were banking on Bill O'Brien and

0:38:56.440 --> 0:39:00.480
<v Speaker 1>Adriene Klem to elevate the group they had rather than

0:39:00.520 --> 0:39:02.120
<v Speaker 1>add to it. But at the end of the day,

0:39:02.160 --> 0:39:04.920
<v Speaker 1>it's a spot where you need somebody to win. Rout

0:39:05.040 --> 0:39:06.040
<v Speaker 1>might not be able to get that.

0:39:06.239 --> 0:39:08.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's just that's what it is.

0:39:08.360 --> 0:39:11.279
<v Speaker 1>And and and let let me let me let me

0:39:11.360 --> 0:39:15.080
<v Speaker 1>say this, like O'Brien and Klement elevated that group on Sunday, Yeah,

0:39:15.120 --> 0:39:18.560
<v Speaker 1>they absolutely did. But it was just to the extent

0:39:18.640 --> 0:39:19.840
<v Speaker 1>that they were never gonna be able to do to

0:39:19.880 --> 0:39:22.880
<v Speaker 1>the extent which they need to because down two guards,

0:39:23.200 --> 0:39:25.600
<v Speaker 1>down the number one wide receiver. I know you're rolling right, Oh,

0:39:25.680 --> 0:39:30.840
<v Speaker 1>we're celebrating twenty points. Given the scenario, twenty points. You

0:39:30.880 --> 0:39:32.680
<v Speaker 1>told me they were going to put up three hundred

0:39:32.680 --> 0:39:35.399
<v Speaker 1>and eighty yards and twenty points in that scenario, I'd

0:39:35.400 --> 0:39:38.120
<v Speaker 1>say they did a pretty good job all things considered.

0:39:38.239 --> 0:39:42.239
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but they but they gave. They're not saying to

0:39:42.280 --> 0:39:45.960
<v Speaker 2>be happy about team the way I look at it,

0:39:46.440 --> 0:39:48.600
<v Speaker 2>and I know that this is probably not how you're

0:39:48.600 --> 0:39:50.880
<v Speaker 2>going to look at it. But to an extent, they

0:39:50.960 --> 0:39:52.640
<v Speaker 2>netted six points.

0:39:53.400 --> 0:39:56.120
<v Speaker 1>You you, you can't come away from that game and say,

0:39:56.120 --> 0:39:57.520
<v Speaker 1>Bill O'Brien did a badge.

0:39:57.280 --> 0:39:59.160
<v Speaker 2>Of I didn't say that I gave. But that's to

0:39:59.239 --> 0:39:59.799
<v Speaker 2>the point I'm.

0:39:59.719 --> 0:40:01.680
<v Speaker 1>Trying to That's the point I'm trying to make and

0:40:01.680 --> 0:40:04.840
<v Speaker 1>your you're putting my point is like I'm agreeing with you.

0:40:06.560 --> 0:40:10.520
<v Speaker 1>Ohbrian and Clem. The plan was for O Brian Clem

0:40:10.560 --> 0:40:13.280
<v Speaker 1>to elevate the group. They elevated the group on Sunday.

0:40:13.480 --> 0:40:15.280
<v Speaker 2>But that's the whole plan for the whole team.

0:40:15.480 --> 0:40:17.239
<v Speaker 1>But this is my point. I don't this is what

0:40:17.280 --> 0:40:20.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying. I think what you're saying is basically they

0:40:21.040 --> 0:40:22.759
<v Speaker 1>might not be able to elevate them to the point

0:40:22.760 --> 0:40:23.520
<v Speaker 1>that they need to.

0:40:23.520 --> 0:40:26.439
<v Speaker 2>Elevate them, not not in those big moments, right, And

0:40:26.560 --> 0:40:32.400
<v Speaker 2>I the the difference is and I so this is

0:40:32.480 --> 0:40:34.239
<v Speaker 2>this is my other mistake of why I came in

0:40:34.280 --> 0:40:37.680
<v Speaker 2>so hot. On Tuesday. After I watched the Patriots film

0:40:37.719 --> 0:40:40.360
<v Speaker 2>and did did my my uh after further review and

0:40:40.400 --> 0:40:42.359
<v Speaker 2>all that stuff for the Patriots and got that out

0:40:42.360 --> 0:40:46.360
<v Speaker 2>of the way, I I turned on Chargers Dolphins and

0:40:46.400 --> 0:40:50.080
<v Speaker 2>I watched the Chargers Dolphins game, and in that particular

0:40:50.200 --> 0:40:53.520
<v Speaker 2>game to A played out of his mind. He was fantastic.

0:40:53.920 --> 0:40:56.600
<v Speaker 1>We played against a coach defense, but yeah.

0:40:56.520 --> 0:40:58.919
<v Speaker 2>He played out of his mind. He was really freaking good.

0:40:59.480 --> 0:41:00.839
<v Speaker 2>Justin Herbert also really good.

0:41:01.440 --> 0:41:01.960
<v Speaker 1>I know that.

0:41:02.080 --> 0:41:07.160
<v Speaker 2>And so I watched two quarterbacks that right now might

0:41:07.239 --> 0:41:10.040
<v Speaker 2>be like top five, top ten quarterbacks in the league

0:41:11.239 --> 0:41:15.000
<v Speaker 2>after watching Mac and the Patriots offense.

0:41:15.080 --> 0:41:18.040
<v Speaker 1>And oh so this is just recency bias seven, that's all.

0:41:18.040 --> 0:41:22.480
<v Speaker 2>This is partially the what. And I'm telling you it's

0:41:22.520 --> 0:41:25.120
<v Speaker 2>not just the quarterback play. So I don't want people

0:41:25.120 --> 0:41:27.640
<v Speaker 2>to focus in on that either. It's not just the

0:41:27.719 --> 0:41:30.080
<v Speaker 2>quarterback play. But when I tell you that it looked

0:41:30.160 --> 0:41:33.080
<v Speaker 2>like the Miami offense was playing a different sport, I

0:41:33.480 --> 0:41:37.640
<v Speaker 2>really am not saying like it really was. Because the

0:41:37.680 --> 0:41:44.200
<v Speaker 2>Patriots offense needs to go ten plays on an eighty

0:41:44.360 --> 0:41:47.440
<v Speaker 2>r drive and like meticulate, matriculate down the field and

0:41:47.480 --> 0:41:49.480
<v Speaker 2>all that kind of stuff and not make any mistakes

0:41:49.520 --> 0:41:51.880
<v Speaker 2>to go backwards, to stay ahead of the chains and

0:41:51.880 --> 0:41:54.279
<v Speaker 2>beyond schedule and all. The Miami just like throws it

0:41:54.360 --> 0:41:56.160
<v Speaker 2>up to Tyreek and it's the touchdown, right, So.

0:41:56.200 --> 0:42:00.080
<v Speaker 1>Yes, but they don't have This is what's what's annoying

0:42:00.200 --> 0:42:02.080
<v Speaker 1>to me about your take. And by the way, they

0:42:02.080 --> 0:42:04.560
<v Speaker 1>don't need to do that. They went sixty three plays

0:42:04.560 --> 0:42:06.400
<v Speaker 1>in six yards for touchdown before they had plays a

0:42:06.400 --> 0:42:08.480
<v Speaker 1>good two minute. That was a great two minute trail.

0:42:08.520 --> 0:42:10.040
<v Speaker 2>I almost put that as a gold star, But I

0:42:10.120 --> 0:42:10.640
<v Speaker 2>just gave it to.

0:42:10.600 --> 0:42:12.879
<v Speaker 1>O'Brien, Okay, fair enough. I mean O'Brien played a big

0:42:13.200 --> 0:42:15.000
<v Speaker 1>part in it. They went They did that without calling

0:42:15.000 --> 0:42:21.040
<v Speaker 1>a time out, which is impressive. So you have proven

0:42:21.120 --> 0:42:23.680
<v Speaker 1>that Tyreek Hill is better than any receiver on the Patriots.

0:42:23.719 --> 0:42:25.000
<v Speaker 1>Congratulations on your hot take.

0:42:25.120 --> 0:42:30.160
<v Speaker 2>I'm not saying that. I'm just telling you that the execution,

0:42:30.320 --> 0:42:33.640
<v Speaker 2>the speed, the dynamic playmaking, like all that stuff from

0:42:33.719 --> 0:42:36.560
<v Speaker 2>the quarterback on out was just different in that game,

0:42:37.280 --> 0:42:42.239
<v Speaker 2>and that, as a Patriots fan, most importantly, is frustrating

0:42:42.280 --> 0:42:44.759
<v Speaker 2>because we've been talking about this for four years now,

0:42:45.640 --> 0:42:49.120
<v Speaker 2>really five, like going back to nineteen Brady's last year,

0:42:50.360 --> 0:42:54.080
<v Speaker 2>and it's the same story about the talent on the team.

0:42:54.840 --> 0:42:57.600
<v Speaker 2>I agree with you that they looked better. I agree

0:42:57.600 --> 0:43:00.920
<v Speaker 2>with you that Mac looked better. Everybody looked better on offense.

0:43:01.800 --> 0:43:04.600
<v Speaker 2>The coordinating was better, the play calling was better, the

0:43:04.640 --> 0:43:08.839
<v Speaker 2>play design was better, the quarterback was better. But at

0:43:08.840 --> 0:43:12.200
<v Speaker 2>the end of the day, they still have middling talent.

0:43:12.440 --> 0:43:16.400
<v Speaker 2>They just do. So you're right. I don't think they

0:43:16.440 --> 0:43:19.920
<v Speaker 2>need to change the quarterback to make it even to

0:43:19.960 --> 0:43:21.880
<v Speaker 2>get over the hump, if you want to call it that,

0:43:22.440 --> 0:43:25.160
<v Speaker 2>but they had to change something and now We're in

0:43:25.200 --> 0:43:27.040
<v Speaker 2>the season, so they're probably not going to make any

0:43:27.120 --> 0:43:28.920
<v Speaker 2>drastic changes to the roster.

0:43:28.960 --> 0:43:30.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, is there a change they could make at

0:43:30.560 --> 0:43:32.239
<v Speaker 1>this point that would I guess Mike Evans would be

0:43:32.239 --> 0:43:32.520
<v Speaker 1>the one.

0:43:32.719 --> 0:43:35.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, if Mike Evans or like T Higgins comes available

0:43:35.520 --> 0:43:36.160
<v Speaker 2>or something like that.

0:43:36.200 --> 0:43:37.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't think the Bengals are tracking a right.

0:43:37.880 --> 0:43:39.439
<v Speaker 2>But let's I don't want to get too bogged down

0:43:39.480 --> 0:43:42.200
<v Speaker 2>all this as we already have, so let's open up

0:43:42.239 --> 0:43:43.680
<v Speaker 2>the phone lines and then I do want to talk

0:43:43.719 --> 0:43:45.680
<v Speaker 2>about the defense. We're going to talk about the Dolphins.

0:43:45.680 --> 0:43:48.000
<v Speaker 2>So let's turn the page here and uh, we'll see

0:43:48.000 --> 0:43:50.960
<v Speaker 2>what you guys have to say. Roger's in Wakefield. Roger,

0:43:50.960 --> 0:43:53.080
<v Speaker 2>if you're still there, I really appreciate you waiting on

0:43:53.120 --> 0:43:53.719
<v Speaker 2>hold this long.

0:43:55.040 --> 0:43:56.200
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, nobody.

0:43:57.880 --> 0:43:58.680
<v Speaker 2>Be good. How are you?

0:44:00.400 --> 0:44:03.240
<v Speaker 4>Let's move on from this game. We had enough discussed

0:44:03.360 --> 0:44:06.560
<v Speaker 4>the back and will pell at the cross to building.

0:44:07.040 --> 0:44:11.200
<v Speaker 4>So I just have two comments. One is from the

0:44:11.280 --> 0:44:15.800
<v Speaker 4>Dolphins game, which I want your response. How the fazious

0:44:15.880 --> 0:44:19.400
<v Speaker 4>defense is going to handle the hall the whole motion

0:44:19.600 --> 0:44:24.040
<v Speaker 4>thing of Tyre Kim, How Jonathan Jones and the other

0:44:24.160 --> 0:44:27.400
<v Speaker 4>cornerbacks who will be trying to cover him tackle that

0:44:28.040 --> 0:44:31.440
<v Speaker 4>And the second one is what I felt is they

0:44:31.880 --> 0:44:35.520
<v Speaker 4>they played a lot of bookies in the game greats

0:44:36.040 --> 0:44:38.360
<v Speaker 4>except one troop. He played only ten steps.

0:44:38.640 --> 0:44:39.280
<v Speaker 5>That is market.

0:44:40.320 --> 0:44:43.200
<v Speaker 4>I think they kept him safe. That's what I think.

0:44:43.719 --> 0:44:44.640
<v Speaker 4>I want your take.

0:44:45.800 --> 0:44:48.440
<v Speaker 2>So you think, what was it on Marty Mapu? Sorry,

0:44:48.440 --> 0:44:52.600
<v Speaker 2>I I think they were hiding him for this game.

0:44:52.920 --> 0:44:55.239
<v Speaker 4>They are not unleashing him in that game. They just

0:44:55.280 --> 0:44:58.560
<v Speaker 4>want to be use his powers in this game, his

0:44:58.680 --> 0:45:00.839
<v Speaker 4>speed or something like that. That's what I think.

0:45:03.000 --> 0:45:05.080
<v Speaker 2>Got it, got it. Thanks for the Colorajer, you really

0:45:05.080 --> 0:45:09.960
<v Speaker 2>appreciate it. And we'll we'll we'll answer that question. Do

0:45:09.960 --> 0:45:11.799
<v Speaker 2>you think they were hiding Mark. I don't know if

0:45:11.840 --> 0:45:12.600
<v Speaker 2>they were hiding him.

0:45:12.600 --> 0:45:14.400
<v Speaker 1>I think he said for this game, like why they

0:45:14.440 --> 0:45:16.640
<v Speaker 1>didn't see him in the in the summer. I mean

0:45:16.719 --> 0:45:18.239
<v Speaker 1>he was hurt as part of it.

0:45:19.120 --> 0:45:20.080
<v Speaker 2>So I don't know.

0:45:20.200 --> 0:45:21.759
<v Speaker 1>I don't think they hit him in this game. I

0:45:21.760 --> 0:45:24.760
<v Speaker 1>mean you saw him spying Jalen Hurts, he was covering

0:45:24.760 --> 0:45:27.120
<v Speaker 1>a J. Brown down the field. He was everywhere.

0:45:27.239 --> 0:45:28.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean only played like ten snaps.

0:45:29.080 --> 0:45:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, he played some high impact snaps. He did like

0:45:31.040 --> 0:45:32.839
<v Speaker 1>the assignments they gave him time.

0:45:32.920 --> 0:45:35.120
<v Speaker 2>My guess is that the way that they view So

0:45:35.200 --> 0:45:37.239
<v Speaker 2>Christian Zal is gonna playe hundred percent of snaps every

0:45:37.280 --> 0:45:39.680
<v Speaker 2>week right like he's he's out there, he's first round pick.

0:45:39.920 --> 0:45:41.719
<v Speaker 2>He's going to play all the time. I think with

0:45:41.800 --> 0:45:45.279
<v Speaker 2>Kean Whiten and Marte Maphu to not put like too

0:45:45.320 --> 0:45:47.080
<v Speaker 2>much on their plate right out of the gate. My

0:45:47.120 --> 0:45:50.080
<v Speaker 2>guess is the plan, like you kind of just alluded to,

0:45:50.760 --> 0:45:54.759
<v Speaker 2>is to pick and choose your high impact spots with

0:45:54.840 --> 0:45:59.000
<v Speaker 2>those guys. I thought Mapu was fine. I mean I

0:45:59.040 --> 0:46:01.960
<v Speaker 2>there was one rep that I really really liked from him. Obviously,

0:46:02.000 --> 0:46:04.680
<v Speaker 2>the post safety rep was was nice with Gonzalez on

0:46:04.719 --> 0:46:07.279
<v Speaker 2>the post, but he had the post corner route to

0:46:07.239 --> 0:46:09.560
<v Speaker 2>a J. Brown that was good. But there was a

0:46:09.560 --> 0:46:12.279
<v Speaker 2>play and this was a this was an issue for them,

0:46:12.640 --> 0:46:15.319
<v Speaker 2>uh in terms of picking up the crosser from this

0:46:15.520 --> 0:46:17.600
<v Speaker 2>passing strength going to the weak side of the field

0:46:18.080 --> 0:46:21.120
<v Speaker 2>and uh, Marty mop who was in the week cook

0:46:21.160 --> 0:46:23.360
<v Speaker 2>and and he actually turned and picked up the crosser

0:46:23.480 --> 0:46:25.400
<v Speaker 2>for the first guy that did it right like you

0:46:25.440 --> 0:46:29.280
<v Speaker 2>know Bentley I thought missed one. I think it was Bentley.

0:46:29.640 --> 0:46:29.759
<v Speaker 6>Uh.

0:46:29.800 --> 0:46:31.840
<v Speaker 2>And then somebody that was playing in the slab I

0:46:31.840 --> 0:46:33.600
<v Speaker 2>don't remember who it was somebody that was playing in

0:46:33.640 --> 0:46:36.239
<v Speaker 2>the slot, miss miss Dallas Goddard on that post corner

0:46:36.320 --> 0:46:39.399
<v Speaker 2>route and he was wide open if if Jalen Hurts

0:46:39.440 --> 0:46:42.200
<v Speaker 2>had thrown had thrown the crosser, and I thought Marty

0:46:42.200 --> 0:46:45.160
<v Speaker 2>mop who did a really nice job of taking that away.

0:46:45.160 --> 0:46:46.760
<v Speaker 2>So maybe it was something they came to the sideline

0:46:46.800 --> 0:46:48.520
<v Speaker 2>and they said, hey, guys, we gotta we gotta clean

0:46:48.560 --> 0:46:50.400
<v Speaker 2>this up, and and he was able to be on it.

0:46:50.440 --> 0:46:52.520
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, But do I think they were hiding

0:46:52.640 --> 0:46:55.799
<v Speaker 2>him No. I think that they are easing him in

0:46:55.960 --> 0:46:57.919
<v Speaker 2>is a better way of putting it. I don't think

0:46:57.920 --> 0:47:00.920
<v Speaker 2>that they feel like he's fully ready to play as

0:47:01.000 --> 0:47:03.440
<v Speaker 2>much as like Gonzalez played, for example.

0:47:04.200 --> 0:47:05.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think that's fair.

0:47:05.160 --> 0:47:08.680
<v Speaker 2>All right, let's take this file from Todd. What's up Todd?

0:47:09.680 --> 0:47:14.480
<v Speaker 3>Hey, guys. So, I think the difference between McDaniel's offense

0:47:14.520 --> 0:47:16.560
<v Speaker 3>when you know Mack was in it, and then.

0:47:16.440 --> 0:47:18.960
<v Speaker 5>Of course last year's debacle is.

0:47:18.920 --> 0:47:22.920
<v Speaker 3>That Bill O'Brien can actually game plan and just develop

0:47:22.960 --> 0:47:26.960
<v Speaker 3>an offense based around mac talents. I don't think McDaniels

0:47:27.000 --> 0:47:28.879
<v Speaker 3>did that. I think he's you know, might have changed

0:47:28.920 --> 0:47:31.360
<v Speaker 3>his opens a little bit, but it's still McDaniel's offense.

0:47:31.400 --> 0:47:32.759
<v Speaker 3>He wants you to run it. The same thing is

0:47:32.760 --> 0:47:35.280
<v Speaker 3>happening at the Raiders is like, you run my offense.

0:47:35.360 --> 0:47:39.200
<v Speaker 3>That's why you know last year there was quarterback controversy

0:47:39.239 --> 0:47:42.959
<v Speaker 3>because you know, it wasn't wasn't as a round peg

0:47:43.080 --> 0:47:46.440
<v Speaker 3>in a square hole, vice versa whichever. And I think

0:47:46.480 --> 0:47:50.160
<v Speaker 3>that maybe, just maybe, you know, as a league, as

0:47:50.160 --> 0:47:52.359
<v Speaker 3>the year progresses, we're going to see something from Max

0:47:52.440 --> 0:47:54.400
<v Speaker 3>that you know, this is the year, This is the

0:47:54.440 --> 0:47:56.600
<v Speaker 3>year when he gets a chance, because this should be

0:47:56.840 --> 0:47:59.799
<v Speaker 3>his offense and designed around him. So I think this

0:47:59.880 --> 0:48:02.400
<v Speaker 3>is a make or break here. In all honesty, I

0:48:02.400 --> 0:48:04.319
<v Speaker 3>don't see him coming out of this year with either

0:48:04.360 --> 0:48:07.520
<v Speaker 3>being successful or gone. I can't see any other thing.

0:48:07.520 --> 0:48:09.839
<v Speaker 3>I don't see him continuing. If he's not successful, he's

0:48:09.840 --> 0:48:12.359
<v Speaker 3>done because this offense is his. What do you guys

0:48:12.400 --> 0:48:12.839
<v Speaker 3>think safe?

0:48:13.200 --> 0:48:15.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? Great, great call to great call because I couldn't

0:48:15.440 --> 0:48:18.640
<v Speaker 2>agree more about the difference between O'Brien and McDaniels, because

0:48:18.840 --> 0:48:22.319
<v Speaker 2>this is something Alex said, I don't necessarily want it

0:48:22.360 --> 0:48:24.120
<v Speaker 2>to be. You know, I love Josh McDaniels. I'm a

0:48:24.120 --> 0:48:26.840
<v Speaker 2>big McDaniels guy, but I agree with Todd one hundred

0:48:26.880 --> 0:48:30.920
<v Speaker 2>and fifty percent that McDaniels is McDaniels. McDaniels runs his

0:48:31.000 --> 0:48:34.920
<v Speaker 2>offense to the point where, frankly, other than like the

0:48:35.000 --> 0:48:37.000
<v Speaker 2>read option stuff that they put in for Cam Newton,

0:48:37.040 --> 0:48:39.200
<v Speaker 2>they were asking Cam Newton to like do Tom Brady thing.

0:48:39.280 --> 0:48:42.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah in twenty twenty, Like, they didn't change the passing

0:48:42.600 --> 0:48:45.240
<v Speaker 2>concepts of that offense a whole lot for Cam Newton.

0:48:45.600 --> 0:48:50.239
<v Speaker 2>So I agree one hundred and ten percent that McDaniels

0:48:50.719 --> 0:48:53.880
<v Speaker 2>is you do my you run my things like this

0:48:54.000 --> 0:48:54.640
<v Speaker 2>is my offense.

0:48:54.760 --> 0:48:56.839
<v Speaker 1>You figure how many like scheme touch guys that they

0:48:56.840 --> 0:48:59.000
<v Speaker 1>try to bring in here under McDaniels that's never worked out,

0:48:59.040 --> 0:49:00.720
<v Speaker 1>like you'd see those pass and stuff.

0:49:00.800 --> 0:49:03.759
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and he what's happening with the Raiders. And I

0:49:03.760 --> 0:49:08.200
<v Speaker 2>think that they drafted mac Jones in part because they

0:49:08.239 --> 0:49:10.840
<v Speaker 2>figure kne Josh McDaniel's going to be his offensive coordinator.

0:49:10.840 --> 0:49:12.960
<v Speaker 2>Maybe they thought it was going to be a longer

0:49:13.200 --> 0:49:15.680
<v Speaker 2>runway than it ended up being. Yeah, but they thought

0:49:15.760 --> 0:49:18.200
<v Speaker 2>Josh McDaniel's going to be the offensive coordinator, and in

0:49:18.239 --> 0:49:21.760
<v Speaker 2>that draft, he was the best fit for the McDaniels offense,

0:49:21.760 --> 0:49:24.240
<v Speaker 2>And that's why they they drafted him in the first round.

0:49:24.560 --> 0:49:27.160
<v Speaker 2>So I agree wholeheartedly that that's a great way of

0:49:27.239 --> 0:49:31.520
<v Speaker 2>putting the differences I feel between McDaniels and O'Brien, because

0:49:31.800 --> 0:49:36.000
<v Speaker 2>I will add this, I don't think that the pat

0:49:36.160 --> 0:49:39.399
<v Speaker 2>I don't think it's I don't think it's fair to

0:49:39.440 --> 0:49:42.680
<v Speaker 2>say or categorize and say that the Patriots are running

0:49:42.719 --> 0:49:45.680
<v Speaker 2>the same offense they were running with Josh McDaniels. I

0:49:45.680 --> 0:49:50.120
<v Speaker 2>think there's a lot of pretty significant schematic differences between

0:49:50.120 --> 0:49:53.640
<v Speaker 2>how O'Brien approaches the offense and how McDaniels approached the offense,

0:49:53.880 --> 0:49:58.080
<v Speaker 2>both from a formation grouping standpoint, obviously not having a

0:49:58.120 --> 0:50:01.439
<v Speaker 2>fullback and not having twenty one personal and not using

0:50:01.520 --> 0:50:05.239
<v Speaker 2>at avenue. But also I would just say from the

0:50:05.280 --> 0:50:07.839
<v Speaker 2>way that their passing game is is designed, I think

0:50:07.920 --> 0:50:12.960
<v Speaker 2>it's significantly not not say significantly maybe, but different. They

0:50:12.960 --> 0:50:14.560
<v Speaker 2>have a lot of the same concepts, they have a

0:50:14.600 --> 0:50:17.920
<v Speaker 2>lot of the same ideas in terms of, like you know,

0:50:18.520 --> 0:50:21.359
<v Speaker 2>option routes based off of leverage and like things like that,

0:50:21.440 --> 0:50:24.279
<v Speaker 2>but like in terms of how they design their offenses,

0:50:24.400 --> 0:50:29.439
<v Speaker 2>I don't think it's a fair, uh categorization to say

0:50:29.480 --> 0:50:31.640
<v Speaker 2>that this is the same offense. That they were running

0:50:31.680 --> 0:50:32.359
<v Speaker 2>at twenty twenty one.

0:50:32.440 --> 0:50:34.319
<v Speaker 1>No, it's definitely not. I mean they're related, you know,

0:50:34.400 --> 0:50:36.480
<v Speaker 1>it's they're they're closer to each other than they are

0:50:36.520 --> 0:50:37.600
<v Speaker 1>to Patricia's offense.

0:50:37.640 --> 0:50:38.360
<v Speaker 2>Their cousins.

0:50:38.719 --> 0:50:40.319
<v Speaker 1>Well, no, but I mean like they're close to each

0:50:40.360 --> 0:50:42.400
<v Speaker 1>other than they either one is to Patricia's offense, but

0:50:42.800 --> 0:50:46.320
<v Speaker 1>they're not. Yeah, they're not the same thing either their cousins.

0:50:46.680 --> 0:50:49.120
<v Speaker 1>It's like, you know, like when you talk about like languages, right,

0:50:49.160 --> 0:50:52.400
<v Speaker 1>and it's like, you know, like English and French and languages.

0:50:52.640 --> 0:50:56.359
<v Speaker 2>It's like if you were speaking uh, you know, Italian. Yeah,

0:50:56.360 --> 0:50:59.680
<v Speaker 2>but like sometimes like Northern Italians different than Southern Italian.

0:50:59.719 --> 0:51:01.040
<v Speaker 1>Like, I don't I even thought it was more different

0:51:01.080 --> 0:51:02.360
<v Speaker 1>than that. I was going to say. More, it's like,

0:51:02.760 --> 0:51:06.239
<v Speaker 1>you know, like French English, it's spand it they all

0:51:06.280 --> 0:51:08.040
<v Speaker 1>come from like the Saint they all come from Latin, right,

0:51:08.080 --> 0:51:11.080
<v Speaker 1>and then there's everyone it's called like other languages and

0:51:11.160 --> 0:51:11.759
<v Speaker 1>other parts of the world.

0:51:12.040 --> 0:51:15.000
<v Speaker 2>So you think that that they're both romance languages.

0:51:14.719 --> 0:51:17.440
<v Speaker 1>Right, But that's the term I'm looking for res Like, yeah,

0:51:17.600 --> 0:51:19.800
<v Speaker 1>so they're in that same family, but they're different languages.

0:51:20.239 --> 0:51:22.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I agree with that, And but I hear that

0:51:22.920 --> 0:51:25.719
<v Speaker 2>a lot like that, Oh it's the same offense, Like, no,

0:51:25.800 --> 0:51:27.520
<v Speaker 2>it's really not, it's really not.

0:51:27.600 --> 0:51:29.399
<v Speaker 1>And then it's this, now, all right, I'll say this

0:51:29.960 --> 0:51:32.440
<v Speaker 1>if it's if we're going to compare it to something

0:51:32.440 --> 0:51:34.160
<v Speaker 1>that and I don't think I'm breaking any news here.

0:51:34.520 --> 0:51:37.520
<v Speaker 1>The comparison to Mac Jones past is to Alabama, No,

0:51:37.640 --> 0:51:38.279
<v Speaker 1>to his rookie year.

0:51:38.360 --> 0:51:40.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, because that was the other thing I was about

0:51:40.160 --> 0:51:42.359
<v Speaker 2>to say was that, you know, McDaniels doesn't run any

0:51:42.360 --> 0:51:45.480
<v Speaker 2>of this college stuff, like he doesn't run. Yeah, he

0:51:45.520 --> 0:51:47.560
<v Speaker 2>doesn't run any of that kind of stuff as much

0:51:47.600 --> 0:51:49.319
<v Speaker 2>I should. You know, it's in his playbook, but he

0:51:49.360 --> 0:51:52.840
<v Speaker 2>doesn't really. He told me in twenty one. I remember

0:51:52.880 --> 0:51:55.040
<v Speaker 2>asking him about it and he said, we don't major

0:51:55.320 --> 0:51:55.960
<v Speaker 2>in RP.

0:51:56.160 --> 0:51:57.560
<v Speaker 1>He was like, mad, at you've asked.

0:51:58.120 --> 0:52:00.200
<v Speaker 2>Well, I mean, it was ridiculous that they weren't running them.

0:52:00.200 --> 0:52:02.520
<v Speaker 2>I love the guy, but like, yeah, this quarter this

0:52:02.640 --> 0:52:05.200
<v Speaker 2>RPO quarterback that lit it up on RPOs in college

0:52:05.200 --> 0:52:07.239
<v Speaker 2>and they just never called them for Mac his rookie year.

0:52:07.320 --> 0:52:10.880
<v Speaker 2>It was it was ridiculous. Anyways, I digress, but I

0:52:11.360 --> 0:52:15.520
<v Speaker 2>agree with Todd that that is a feather in O'Brien's

0:52:15.560 --> 0:52:18.560
<v Speaker 2>cap that I think O'Brien will continue to build this

0:52:18.640 --> 0:52:20.919
<v Speaker 2>offense around Mac Jones, and I think he already has.

0:52:21.000 --> 0:52:23.560
<v Speaker 2>Like the fact that this offense didn't have a whole

0:52:23.560 --> 0:52:26.600
<v Speaker 2>lot of deep shots in this game, I think was

0:52:26.680 --> 0:52:29.319
<v Speaker 2>related to the offensive line, but I also think it's

0:52:29.360 --> 0:52:31.480
<v Speaker 2>related to Mac Jones. I think that they know that

0:52:31.480 --> 0:52:34.120
<v Speaker 2>they're going to time up their deep shots, but they're

0:52:34.120 --> 0:52:37.319
<v Speaker 2>not necessarily going to be like we saw last year

0:52:37.400 --> 0:52:39.680
<v Speaker 2>in the first six weeks of the season before Mac

0:52:39.719 --> 0:52:41.440
<v Speaker 2>got hurt. I should say first three weeks of the

0:52:41.480 --> 0:52:45.040
<v Speaker 2>season before Mac got hurt, it was bombs away, right,

0:52:45.040 --> 0:52:46.600
<v Speaker 2>And they're definitely not going to be that kind of

0:52:46.600 --> 0:52:49.000
<v Speaker 2>offense this year. So I agree that McDaniels are in,

0:52:49.280 --> 0:52:52.759
<v Speaker 2>O'Brien are different, and O'Brien, I think is I don't

0:52:52.760 --> 0:52:55.480
<v Speaker 2>know if it's necessarily that O'Brien's changing his offense for Mac,

0:52:55.520 --> 0:52:59.839
<v Speaker 2>but his offense is already almost pre built to fit

0:53:00.080 --> 0:53:02.200
<v Speaker 2>Mac and to fit what Max's done in the past

0:53:02.560 --> 0:53:04.760
<v Speaker 2>a little bit better. All right, let's go to Sean

0:53:04.760 --> 0:53:06.160
<v Speaker 2>and Vancouver. What's up Sean?

0:53:07.920 --> 0:53:08.359
<v Speaker 3>Hey Evan.

0:53:08.440 --> 0:53:11.840
<v Speaker 7>First off, I'd like to say Shanatova.

0:53:12.560 --> 0:53:14.920
<v Speaker 2>To Alex too, both of us, right, Alex.

0:53:14.680 --> 0:53:15.719
<v Speaker 4>Oh, both of you both.

0:53:16.360 --> 0:53:18.399
<v Speaker 7>I didn't even know Alex. I didn't realize you were

0:53:18.920 --> 0:53:19.480
<v Speaker 7>Jewish as well.

0:53:19.480 --> 0:53:22.839
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, really, okay, that's a compliment, I think.

0:53:22.880 --> 0:53:24.480
<v Speaker 1>No, I know, it's just most people.

0:53:24.560 --> 0:53:29.040
<v Speaker 2>It's it's anyway, happy New Year, to thank you.

0:53:28.840 --> 0:53:29.080
<v Speaker 8>Thank you.

0:53:29.360 --> 0:53:32.439
<v Speaker 7>Okay. So, Evan, when I called in on Tuesday, didn't

0:53:32.600 --> 0:53:35.200
<v Speaker 7>get a chance or I wasn't able to respond when

0:53:35.280 --> 0:53:38.280
<v Speaker 7>you you were wondering why I was encouraged by today

0:53:38.560 --> 0:53:42.080
<v Speaker 7>you with your three points, you answered it. That's exactly why.

0:53:42.320 --> 0:53:45.840
<v Speaker 7>And I don't have expectations that a lot of people

0:53:45.840 --> 0:53:48.480
<v Speaker 7>do for this season, like we've we've talked a lot

0:53:48.600 --> 0:53:52.480
<v Speaker 7>during the off season about team construction and how disappointing

0:53:52.520 --> 0:53:56.359
<v Speaker 7>that was. So I don't expect the Patriots to make

0:53:56.360 --> 0:53:59.279
<v Speaker 7>the playoffs. That's that's not where my my brain is.

0:53:59.360 --> 0:54:02.839
<v Speaker 7>But looks like you were saying earlier, you know, it's

0:54:02.920 --> 0:54:09.480
<v Speaker 7>encouraging without being a kind of a consolation prize of

0:54:10.200 --> 0:54:13.759
<v Speaker 7>not winning. You know, I'm just thinking like, okay, yeah,

0:54:13.800 --> 0:54:17.360
<v Speaker 7>we've seen this before. It doesn't always work, but maybe

0:54:17.400 --> 0:54:19.799
<v Speaker 7>it will this time. And that's where I am as

0:54:19.840 --> 0:54:22.759
<v Speaker 7>a Patriots fan, Like if I were a Canadians fan,

0:54:23.719 --> 0:54:26.400
<v Speaker 7>I wouldn't even be there. Like in terms of the NHL,

0:54:26.480 --> 0:54:27.960
<v Speaker 7>I would just think, I'm going to wait for them

0:54:27.960 --> 0:54:30.920
<v Speaker 7>to show me something because it's just too dismal to

0:54:31.360 --> 0:54:34.840
<v Speaker 7>even bother with. But with the Patriots, it's I've always

0:54:34.880 --> 0:54:37.520
<v Speaker 7>been a Patriots fan, even back in the nineties when

0:54:37.760 --> 0:54:39.960
<v Speaker 7>you know, ninety and ninety one, ninety two, when it

0:54:40.000 --> 0:54:44.840
<v Speaker 7>was terrible. It's it's just what I do. So I

0:54:44.960 --> 0:54:47.440
<v Speaker 7>have to be encouraged and these are the signs. In

0:54:47.520 --> 0:54:52.360
<v Speaker 7>last year it was just a total mess, And like

0:54:52.440 --> 0:54:55.680
<v Speaker 7>what you said with Bob, it's it looks like, okay,

0:54:55.719 --> 0:54:58.759
<v Speaker 7>there is some structure, we can make some headway and

0:54:58.800 --> 0:55:01.000
<v Speaker 7>things can move forward. So that's what I'm getting at.

0:55:01.120 --> 0:55:04.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, no, that's great. On Tuesday August, just to give

0:55:04.080 --> 0:55:06.920
<v Speaker 2>you context, thanks for the call, Sean, people were just

0:55:06.920 --> 0:55:08.880
<v Speaker 2>calling in and saying I still have hope, and I

0:55:08.960 --> 0:55:11.680
<v Speaker 2>was like, can we just like add some context to

0:55:11.719 --> 0:55:13.640
<v Speaker 2>your hope, like just saying that you have blind hope?

0:55:13.640 --> 0:55:15.000
<v Speaker 2>To me, it means nothing.

0:55:14.600 --> 0:55:18.280
<v Speaker 1>That's that's fan. I mean, we're ultimately rooting for laundry.

0:55:18.280 --> 0:55:20.239
<v Speaker 1>But no, I think what the college just said is

0:55:20.280 --> 0:55:21.759
<v Speaker 1>exactly my point. Do you know what a Rars Shark

0:55:21.800 --> 0:55:22.239
<v Speaker 1>test is?

0:55:22.760 --> 0:55:22.920
<v Speaker 3>Uh?

0:55:23.480 --> 0:55:27.000
<v Speaker 1>No, So Rors Shark test does, yeah, green does? Yeah?

0:55:27.120 --> 0:55:29.800
<v Speaker 1>You know you know all right, it's an ink blot test.

0:55:30.120 --> 0:55:32.799
<v Speaker 1>Ink blot test. Okay, So it's like a psychology thing.

0:55:32.880 --> 0:55:35.359
<v Speaker 1>So they have they have like you have like six

0:55:35.480 --> 0:55:37.759
<v Speaker 1>or eight piece of paper that they just drop ink

0:55:37.840 --> 0:55:40.560
<v Speaker 1>on and they show me to you without any context,

0:55:40.640 --> 0:55:42.920
<v Speaker 1>and you say, what you see. It's like looking at clouds,

0:55:43.160 --> 0:55:45.919
<v Speaker 1>and the idea is supposedly based off what people see

0:55:46.080 --> 0:55:49.440
<v Speaker 1>in the ink, you kind of learn about who they

0:55:49.440 --> 0:55:51.239
<v Speaker 1>are as a person. You can learn about their personality.

0:55:51.719 --> 0:55:53.839
<v Speaker 1>This game, to me is a Rars Shark test. What

0:55:53.920 --> 0:55:56.759
<v Speaker 1>you saw in it depends on and tells me about

0:55:56.800 --> 0:55:57.600
<v Speaker 1>what kind of fan you are.

0:55:57.680 --> 0:56:00.520
<v Speaker 2>So you're basically saying I'm a I hate fun You're.

0:56:01.880 --> 0:56:04.920
<v Speaker 1>Like exactly or the other one. Just to flex my

0:56:05.000 --> 0:56:08.560
<v Speaker 1>c and ap psych senior high school. You know, Schrodinger's

0:56:08.600 --> 0:56:12.319
<v Speaker 1>Cat is no. Schrodinger's Cat is this thought experiment that

0:56:12.320 --> 0:56:15.640
<v Speaker 1>basically there's a cat in a box with like a

0:56:15.680 --> 0:56:19.520
<v Speaker 1>little like like just basically the idea that if there's

0:56:19.560 --> 0:56:22.040
<v Speaker 1>a cat in a box with poison, you don't know

0:56:22.080 --> 0:56:23.759
<v Speaker 1>if the cat is alive. Or dead until you open

0:56:23.760 --> 0:56:28.600
<v Speaker 1>the box. And the like philosophical thing behind that is so,

0:56:28.680 --> 0:56:31.880
<v Speaker 1>until you open the box, the cat is both simultaneously

0:56:31.920 --> 0:56:34.839
<v Speaker 1>alive and dead. If that makes sense, both things are true, right,

0:56:34.920 --> 0:56:37.319
<v Speaker 1>both things are true. So this game in some ways

0:56:37.360 --> 0:56:39.200
<v Speaker 1>Schrodinger's game, because we don't know, we don't have the

0:56:39.200 --> 0:56:43.680
<v Speaker 1>box open. Is this because it does both look like

0:56:44.680 --> 0:56:46.480
<v Speaker 1>that's as much again I got to see in the classes,

0:56:46.480 --> 0:56:49.719
<v Speaker 1>as far as I'm gonna go, that's absolutely they do.

0:56:50.640 --> 0:56:52.600
<v Speaker 1>Somebody in the chat said one p sych course in college,

0:56:52.640 --> 0:56:56.239
<v Speaker 1>try one side course in high school. This game, it

0:56:56.360 --> 0:57:02.120
<v Speaker 1>is both simultaneously the first step under Bill O'Brien and

0:57:02.400 --> 0:57:05.160
<v Speaker 1>in that bubbles and encouraging first step. It is also

0:57:05.200 --> 0:57:08.000
<v Speaker 1>the continuation of the post Tom Brady hour in the

0:57:08.080 --> 0:57:11.279
<v Speaker 1>last four years and until we take the lid off

0:57:11.320 --> 0:57:15.280
<v Speaker 1>the box play more football games. I think both interpretations

0:57:15.320 --> 0:57:17.960
<v Speaker 1>for now are correct. And if you want to call

0:57:17.960 --> 0:57:19.520
<v Speaker 1>that a cop out, call it a cop out. It

0:57:19.600 --> 0:57:22.600
<v Speaker 1>probably is a little bit. But like I can't you

0:57:22.720 --> 0:57:24.240
<v Speaker 1>know how I am. I'm gonna sit here and tell

0:57:24.240 --> 0:57:26.480
<v Speaker 1>you what I believe. If you make a valid argument,

0:57:26.640 --> 0:57:28.640
<v Speaker 1>even if I disagree with it, if you back it

0:57:28.720 --> 0:57:31.440
<v Speaker 1>up I'm going to agree with you. I think you

0:57:31.480 --> 0:57:34.880
<v Speaker 1>could make either argument in a way that I would agree.

0:57:35.200 --> 0:57:37.440
<v Speaker 1>We talk, we were arguing to the other night. I said, yes,

0:57:37.480 --> 0:57:41.440
<v Speaker 1>you're not wrong. They haven't proven they can win that game,

0:57:41.480 --> 0:57:42.800
<v Speaker 1>and I am gonna need to see him do it.

0:57:42.960 --> 0:57:46.000
<v Speaker 1>But at the same time, a team with a first

0:57:46.080 --> 0:57:48.800
<v Speaker 1>year roc with a young quarterback doing what they did

0:57:48.880 --> 0:57:52.800
<v Speaker 1>against that defense, well, it certainly wasn't enough for week

0:57:52.880 --> 0:57:54.840
<v Speaker 1>one to say this is the floor you have, this

0:57:54.880 --> 0:57:58.200
<v Speaker 1>is what you're building on in theory. In theory, yes,

0:57:58.720 --> 0:58:00.560
<v Speaker 1>Week one is your worst perform So.

0:58:00.520 --> 0:58:02.439
<v Speaker 2>But this is I guess. This is where I come

0:58:02.520 --> 0:58:06.160
<v Speaker 2>from with it, is that I knew this was their

0:58:06.200 --> 0:58:08.640
<v Speaker 2>floor going into the year, so I didn't learn anything new.

0:58:09.360 --> 0:58:10.760
<v Speaker 2>I knew, okay, but you're.

0:58:10.600 --> 0:58:12.880
<v Speaker 1>Almost acting like this is closer to the ceiling than

0:58:12.880 --> 0:58:13.320
<v Speaker 1>the floor.

0:58:14.800 --> 0:58:17.720
<v Speaker 2>I suppose, like I guess that's where they just people.

0:58:18.560 --> 0:58:21.080
<v Speaker 2>I think the way I look at it, and this is,

0:58:21.280 --> 0:58:23.000
<v Speaker 2>you know, kind of where I'm coming from with all

0:58:23.040 --> 0:58:25.520
<v Speaker 2>of it, is that I think this is a floor

0:58:25.560 --> 0:58:29.960
<v Speaker 2>football team. I think this football team is designed and

0:58:30.200 --> 0:58:36.600
<v Speaker 2>built to have the coaching and the operation and the

0:58:36.640 --> 0:58:41.360
<v Speaker 2>program and all of this stuff put a good floor

0:58:41.920 --> 0:58:44.320
<v Speaker 2>of eight or nine wins, and then they hope that

0:58:44.600 --> 0:58:46.280
<v Speaker 2>you get it. You get a good bounce here, you

0:58:46.280 --> 0:58:48.720
<v Speaker 2>get a bounce there, you play a backup quarterback here,

0:58:48.760 --> 0:58:50.800
<v Speaker 2>you play a backup quarterback there, and then all of

0:58:50.840 --> 0:58:52.800
<v Speaker 2>a sudden, you're ten to eleven wins, right, Like you.

0:58:52.720 --> 0:59:01.520
<v Speaker 1>Know, right. So, I think given the opponent, like I think,

0:59:01.560 --> 0:59:03.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people expect them to get stopped because

0:59:03.280 --> 0:59:03.760
<v Speaker 1>the Eagles are.

0:59:04.520 --> 0:59:07.360
<v Speaker 2>That's the other thing is I didn't so going into

0:59:07.400 --> 0:59:11.400
<v Speaker 2>this game, I picked Eagles twenty seven Patriots twenty.

0:59:11.440 --> 0:59:14.960
<v Speaker 1>I think the Eagles were top two teams even if

0:59:14.960 --> 0:59:16.560
<v Speaker 1>you want to go beyond the romantics of that. The

0:59:16.560 --> 0:59:18.760
<v Speaker 1>Eagles were top four team in the nflast year.

0:59:18.920 --> 0:59:22.040
<v Speaker 2>But but, but, but but you have to put this

0:59:22.440 --> 0:59:26.120
<v Speaker 2>in context. The Eagles did not play a soul in

0:59:26.200 --> 0:59:27.560
<v Speaker 2>the preseason.

0:59:27.640 --> 0:59:29.400
<v Speaker 1>And because the Patriots played so much.

0:59:29.840 --> 0:59:35.280
<v Speaker 2>But I'm saying that all the trends of the Patriots

0:59:35.280 --> 0:59:39.720
<v Speaker 2>being at home on Tom Brady's return against a raigning

0:59:40.760 --> 0:59:44.000
<v Speaker 2>Super Bowl loser that did not play anybody in the

0:59:44.000 --> 0:59:47.200
<v Speaker 2>preseason told you that the Eagles were probably not going

0:59:47.240 --> 0:59:50.320
<v Speaker 2>to be firing at all cylinders to come out here

0:59:50.440 --> 0:59:51.240
<v Speaker 2>and blow.

0:59:51.040 --> 0:59:53.680
<v Speaker 1>Down when teams used to come in here and it

0:59:53.720 --> 0:59:56.600
<v Speaker 1>was close. Even though the Patriots won, we would say, oh,

0:59:56.960 --> 0:59:59.560
<v Speaker 1>it's a scrappy team. That team might be building something.

1:00:00.080 --> 1:00:01.640
<v Speaker 1>Patriots are just on the other side of that. Now,

1:00:02.520 --> 1:00:05.160
<v Speaker 1>that's all that is. I think being five points worse

1:00:05.200 --> 1:00:07.440
<v Speaker 1>and the defending NFC champion does carry some weight with

1:00:07.480 --> 1:00:09.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people. Whether you think that's fair or not,

1:00:09.600 --> 1:00:11.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of gets to my point of the game is

1:00:11.600 --> 1:00:12.560
<v Speaker 1>whatever you want to.

1:00:12.840 --> 1:00:15.640
<v Speaker 2>But my only point of of all this and then

1:00:15.680 --> 1:00:19.360
<v Speaker 2>we're getting bogged down and classically in an argument that

1:00:19.360 --> 1:00:20.280
<v Speaker 2>we're not going I think.

1:00:20.160 --> 1:00:22.240
<v Speaker 1>That's what people want to hear after you've lost your

1:00:22.280 --> 1:00:24.760
<v Speaker 1>mind on Tuesday. Apparently I didn't even hear it.

1:00:24.800 --> 1:00:26.400
<v Speaker 2>I say, did you even listen to the show?

1:00:26.480 --> 1:00:26.600
<v Speaker 5>No?

1:00:26.640 --> 1:00:27.280
<v Speaker 2>But I had not.

1:00:27.320 --> 1:00:29.920
<v Speaker 1>Even on Twitter. I had friends texting me asking if

1:00:29.960 --> 1:00:32.360
<v Speaker 1>you were okay because it was so I can only

1:00:32.400 --> 1:00:33.640
<v Speaker 1>imagine it was spectacular.

1:00:33.680 --> 1:00:35.280
<v Speaker 2>It was spectacular. I'm proud of it.

1:00:35.360 --> 1:00:37.120
<v Speaker 1>So I think this is what people want to hear.

1:00:37.120 --> 1:00:38.160
<v Speaker 2>Against Bill Belichick.

1:00:38.560 --> 1:00:38.680
<v Speaker 1>Uh.

1:00:39.320 --> 1:00:44.520
<v Speaker 2>Here's the thing that my whole thing I think coming

1:00:44.560 --> 1:00:48.439
<v Speaker 2>into this game was I thought that the Eagles would

1:00:48.400 --> 1:00:51.040
<v Speaker 2>be a little bit rusty. I thought that the Patriots

1:00:51.080 --> 1:00:53.240
<v Speaker 2>would keep this close because of all the things I

1:00:53.360 --> 1:00:58.720
<v Speaker 2>just laid out, So just being competitive, I expected them.

1:00:58.800 --> 1:01:04.400
<v Speaker 1>Okay, being five points worse than the Eagles is you know,

1:01:04.760 --> 1:01:06.480
<v Speaker 1>how many points better are the Eagles involvement?

1:01:06.600 --> 1:01:09.760
<v Speaker 2>But they're not five points worse than the Eagles team

1:01:09.840 --> 1:01:11.880
<v Speaker 2>that took the field in the Super Bowl in February.

1:01:12.120 --> 1:01:14.880
<v Speaker 2>They're five points worse than an Eagles team that essentially

1:01:14.880 --> 1:01:16.240
<v Speaker 2>treated this game as a preseason.

1:01:16.240 --> 1:01:19.280
<v Speaker 1>Okay, but they're going to grow. It's not like they're

1:01:19.320 --> 1:01:21.160
<v Speaker 1>not going to have opportunities to improve either.

1:01:21.000 --> 1:01:23.520
<v Speaker 2>I get it. I'm just saying that the reason why

1:01:23.560 --> 1:01:25.440
<v Speaker 2>I came into the game thinking that it's going to

1:01:25.480 --> 1:01:27.680
<v Speaker 2>be a one score game to begin with was because

1:01:27.800 --> 1:01:30.200
<v Speaker 2>of all of the trends with the Eagles, right, and

1:01:30.280 --> 1:01:31.640
<v Speaker 2>so I didn't expect.

1:01:31.640 --> 1:01:33.000
<v Speaker 1>But the Patriots don't get trends.

1:01:33.160 --> 1:01:35.000
<v Speaker 2>Is kind of like, because my point is that I

1:01:35.040 --> 1:01:36.960
<v Speaker 2>don't think I think a lot of people, like you

1:01:37.200 --> 1:01:39.400
<v Speaker 2>kind of said a few minutes ago, a lot of

1:01:39.400 --> 1:01:41.160
<v Speaker 2>people thought the Patriots are going to get blown out

1:01:41.160 --> 1:01:41.600
<v Speaker 2>in this game.

1:01:42.080 --> 1:01:45.040
<v Speaker 1>I never felt that way, even when even when we

1:01:45.120 --> 1:01:47.000
<v Speaker 1>got the inter report and Mike and went and Cole

1:01:47.040 --> 1:01:49.160
<v Speaker 1>Strange weren't playing and Devonte Parker was ruled out.

1:01:49.280 --> 1:01:52.680
<v Speaker 2>I was more I was a little bit concerned at

1:01:52.680 --> 1:01:55.560
<v Speaker 2>that point, but I still didn't think the Eagles would

1:01:55.560 --> 1:01:58.240
<v Speaker 2>have the execution offensively to run away with it because

1:01:58.240 --> 1:02:02.960
<v Speaker 2>of how little those guys did in August. And that's

1:02:03.000 --> 1:02:05.120
<v Speaker 2>just you know. I think Reese put it in his

1:02:05.200 --> 1:02:06.800
<v Speaker 2>Sunday notes coming into the.

1:02:07.280 --> 1:02:09.080
<v Speaker 1>I think what we've unlocked here is not that you're

1:02:09.120 --> 1:02:11.720
<v Speaker 1>being too estimatetic. You may have been being too optimistic.

1:02:11.840 --> 1:02:15.360
<v Speaker 2>Maybe I think that's the real problem here, is we've

1:02:15.520 --> 1:02:18.560
<v Speaker 2>launched it was it was a combination of of my

1:02:18.680 --> 1:02:20.760
<v Speaker 2>expectations coming into the game, where maybe a little bit

1:02:20.800 --> 1:02:23.400
<v Speaker 2>higher than other people, because I thought the Patriots would

1:02:23.400 --> 1:02:26.280
<v Speaker 2>compete in the game to begin with. I think the

1:02:26.360 --> 1:02:29.320
<v Speaker 2>reason why is I said the trends. But I also

1:02:29.680 --> 1:02:31.720
<v Speaker 2>mention I think the Patriots are going to compete in

1:02:31.760 --> 1:02:34.040
<v Speaker 2>a lot of games because they have that floor. Their

1:02:34.080 --> 1:02:37.320
<v Speaker 2>coaching is good. Their coaching is good, and I want

1:02:37.360 --> 1:02:40.080
<v Speaker 2>to talk about the defense who coached their butts off

1:02:40.080 --> 1:02:43.320
<v Speaker 2>on that side of the ball against the Eagles. Their

1:02:43.360 --> 1:02:46.760
<v Speaker 2>coaching is good. They have good coaching, So they're going

1:02:46.840 --> 1:02:49.640
<v Speaker 2>to be a floor team because of that they're not

1:02:49.720 --> 1:02:53.320
<v Speaker 2>going to stink because they're coaching is really really sound

1:02:53.520 --> 1:02:56.479
<v Speaker 2>on both sides of the football. So I can't thought,

1:02:56.520 --> 1:02:58.840
<v Speaker 2>coming in along with the fact that I thought the

1:02:58.840 --> 1:03:01.200
<v Speaker 2>Patriots are going to hang in there against most teams

1:03:01.240 --> 1:03:04.200
<v Speaker 2>this year, that the Patriots would be close in this

1:03:04.320 --> 1:03:07.439
<v Speaker 2>game against Philadelphia. And that's exactly what happened. And as

1:03:07.480 --> 1:03:11.120
<v Speaker 2>the game was ending live, we sat talked to him

1:03:11.120 --> 1:03:13.240
<v Speaker 2>about this on Tuesday, so Marine can back me up.

1:03:13.600 --> 1:03:17.080
<v Speaker 2>Deuce and Paul were saying, they're gonna win the game. Patriots. Yeah,

1:03:17.080 --> 1:03:18.920
<v Speaker 2>they're gonna drive in, They're gonna win the game, and

1:03:19.000 --> 1:03:22.880
<v Speaker 2>I kept on saying, no, they're not. Just just wait,

1:03:22.920 --> 1:03:23.200
<v Speaker 2>I was.

1:03:23.240 --> 1:03:24.640
<v Speaker 1>I was with you on that. I was sitting next

1:03:24.640 --> 1:03:27.080
<v Speaker 1>to my cad like, and right after the jabill peppersonly goes,

1:03:27.080 --> 1:03:28.320
<v Speaker 1>do you think they're gonna win? And I'm like, they

1:03:28.360 --> 1:03:30.200
<v Speaker 1>can win, but they haven't won this game in like

1:03:30.240 --> 1:03:31.200
<v Speaker 1>four years, right.

1:03:31.080 --> 1:03:33.480
<v Speaker 2>And it's so that was that was the beginning of

1:03:33.520 --> 1:03:36.880
<v Speaker 2>my turn. Was I had to write the same story

1:03:36.920 --> 1:03:38.480
<v Speaker 2>that I've been writing for for four years.

1:03:38.520 --> 1:03:41.200
<v Speaker 1>So that's my point is where I wonder if you're

1:03:41.240 --> 1:03:43.400
<v Speaker 1>over correcting a bit, And because because I like I

1:03:43.760 --> 1:03:46.520
<v Speaker 1>told you, I told you I wrote three.

1:03:46.160 --> 1:03:49.520
<v Speaker 2>Separate therapy session. Now, like, what's really I I.

1:03:49.520 --> 1:03:52.360
<v Speaker 1>Wrote three separate post game calls because the one thing

1:03:52.400 --> 1:03:54.439
<v Speaker 1>about covering a week one game, and there's a lot

1:03:54.480 --> 1:03:56.720
<v Speaker 1>like covering week one is very different than covering any

1:03:56.760 --> 1:03:59.120
<v Speaker 1>other game, just to pull back the curtain a little bit,

1:03:59.160 --> 1:04:02.400
<v Speaker 1>because you have so many preconceived notions going in. And

1:04:02.480 --> 1:04:05.200
<v Speaker 1>like the example I always give is in twenty twenty,

1:04:05.280 --> 1:04:07.000
<v Speaker 1>remember when Mike when when who came out started playing

1:04:07.040 --> 1:04:09.320
<v Speaker 1>right tackle, hadn't played right tackle at all in camp

1:04:09.480 --> 1:04:11.440
<v Speaker 1>even yeah, and he was amazing at it. And that's like,

1:04:11.680 --> 1:04:14.560
<v Speaker 1>you never have to adjust to seeing something like you

1:04:14.640 --> 1:04:17.600
<v Speaker 1>do in week one. Every it's all unexpected. You're on

1:04:17.600 --> 1:04:19.160
<v Speaker 1>your toes. Sometimes you go into a game, you have

1:04:19.160 --> 1:04:21.480
<v Speaker 1>an idea of kind of what you're gonna talk about postgame,

1:04:21.480 --> 1:04:23.800
<v Speaker 1>and it's like, well, you know, I know, I'm gonna

1:04:23.800 --> 1:04:25.400
<v Speaker 1>focus on this one thing and if it goes this way,

1:04:25.400 --> 1:04:27.439
<v Speaker 1>I'll do this, because that will do that whatever. Week

1:04:27.480 --> 1:04:29.320
<v Speaker 1>ones the one time you can't really do that. The

1:04:29.400 --> 1:04:32.080
<v Speaker 1>one thing you do not expect covering a week one game, Evan,

1:04:32.800 --> 1:04:35.480
<v Speaker 1>is to have to worry that you're gonna be repeating yourself,

1:04:36.160 --> 1:04:39.440
<v Speaker 1>and that was my thing. After the game, I was like,

1:04:39.520 --> 1:04:41.480
<v Speaker 1>because how many times last year did I have to

1:04:41.520 --> 1:04:45.000
<v Speaker 1>write and you and everybody that stupid column that was

1:04:45.040 --> 1:04:47.640
<v Speaker 1>like it was it's been the story of the year,

1:04:47.680 --> 1:04:49.320
<v Speaker 1>or here we go again, and I'm running out of

1:04:49.360 --> 1:04:53.640
<v Speaker 1>synonyms for late game failure or whatever, and I'm sitting here,

1:04:53.680 --> 1:04:56.480
<v Speaker 1>it's like it's week one and I'm having deja vu,

1:04:56.840 --> 1:04:59.439
<v Speaker 1>like this shouldn't be a thing. And I think that's

1:04:59.480 --> 1:05:02.360
<v Speaker 1>where some of the issue in breaking down this game

1:05:02.400 --> 1:05:05.800
<v Speaker 1>comes in, is because you shouldn't be repetitive week one,

1:05:06.320 --> 1:05:09.240
<v Speaker 1>and yet here we are. This game might have as

1:05:09.280 --> 1:05:11.680
<v Speaker 1>well have been played as Week nineteen of the twenty

1:05:11.720 --> 1:05:15.400
<v Speaker 1>twenty two season. It would have fitted playing It looked

1:05:15.440 --> 1:05:16.920
<v Speaker 1>a little weak, not you get what I'm saying, Like

1:05:17.320 --> 1:05:19.960
<v Speaker 1>it looked different, the O'Brien and Patricia stuff. It looked different.

1:05:19.960 --> 1:05:22.600
<v Speaker 1>But the game flow, the game story, it was like, yeah,

1:05:22.680 --> 1:05:25.720
<v Speaker 1>I've written this before, right, And that was kind of

1:05:25.840 --> 1:05:28.960
<v Speaker 1>jarrings because you don't expect to do that in week one.

1:05:28.920 --> 1:05:30.960
<v Speaker 2>And what I keep coming back to and I'm going

1:05:31.040 --> 1:05:32.520
<v Speaker 2>to keep her. I don't care if I sound like

1:05:32.560 --> 1:05:36.640
<v Speaker 2>a broken record. It looked better it looked sharper, the

1:05:36.640 --> 1:05:40.200
<v Speaker 2>play designs were nicer, it looked prettier, it looked better.

1:05:41.200 --> 1:05:43.840
<v Speaker 2>But the talent level is the same on offense. The

1:05:43.880 --> 1:05:46.680
<v Speaker 2>talent level is the same. So when it came.

1:05:46.560 --> 1:05:48.880
<v Speaker 1>Out, all right, I would push back on that, it's

1:05:48.880 --> 1:05:50.600
<v Speaker 1>not the same. I don't know that it's good enough,

1:05:50.640 --> 1:05:53.280
<v Speaker 1>but it's not the same. It's the same. They have

1:05:53.440 --> 1:05:58.240
<v Speaker 1>Tomorrow Douglas. Now, okay, they but they have Ezekiel Elliott.

1:05:58.240 --> 1:06:01.360
<v Speaker 2>I know it's Tomorrio Douglas beter than Jacobe Myers because

1:06:01.680 --> 1:06:04.040
<v Speaker 2>Juju wasn't on the field, So I can't you can't, Okay.

1:06:03.880 --> 1:06:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Well, I mean I'm more so talking about like, you know,

1:06:06.000 --> 1:06:08.760
<v Speaker 1>they're not throwing Nelson Agler out there, They're not throwing

1:06:08.760 --> 1:06:09.680
<v Speaker 1>a kil Harry out there.

1:06:09.920 --> 1:06:13.600
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Yeah, their receivers are better than they were two years.

1:06:13.840 --> 1:06:15.240
<v Speaker 1>But maybe it's a wash in some of the other

1:06:15.240 --> 1:06:16.800
<v Speaker 1>they didn't have their offensive line, right, maybe it's a

1:06:16.840 --> 1:06:18.320
<v Speaker 1>wash in some of the other direct The talent.

1:06:18.160 --> 1:06:21.520
<v Speaker 2>Level is in the same ballpark. You can tell me

1:06:21.640 --> 1:06:23.560
<v Speaker 2>that this guy's a little bit better than that guy.

1:06:23.680 --> 1:06:25.400
<v Speaker 2>That guy's a little bit better than this guy. But

1:06:25.480 --> 1:06:26.760
<v Speaker 2>at the end of the day, the talent's in the

1:06:26.760 --> 1:06:29.840
<v Speaker 2>same ballpark, and when it was fourth and three, when

1:06:29.880 --> 1:06:33.400
<v Speaker 2>it was fourth in the game, they're just there's there's

1:06:33.480 --> 1:06:36.800
<v Speaker 2>nobody to it doesn't Yeah, it doesn't happen, they don't.

1:06:36.880 --> 1:06:39.360
<v Speaker 1>But it's again that's it goes back to my thing

1:06:39.400 --> 1:06:41.200
<v Speaker 1>of like, I really didn't want to be repetitive covering

1:06:41.200 --> 1:06:43.760
<v Speaker 1>this game. How many times in the spring and in

1:06:43.800 --> 1:06:46.440
<v Speaker 1>the winter, and going back to last year the stupid

1:06:46.480 --> 1:06:49.320
<v Speaker 1>Tuesday meeting thing that we had to explain and the

1:06:49.360 --> 1:06:51.240
<v Speaker 1>coverage dictating wide receiver, It's like.

1:06:51.400 --> 1:06:52.880
<v Speaker 2>Fourth and three was the Tuesday meeting.

1:06:52.960 --> 1:06:58.200
<v Speaker 1>It picked, right, it picked when's the last time? How

1:06:58.240 --> 1:07:00.680
<v Speaker 1>often do we joke over the summer or when we're

1:07:00.720 --> 1:07:03.360
<v Speaker 1>covering OTAs or even during the drive we're talking about

1:07:03.360 --> 1:07:04.640
<v Speaker 1>this now and watch we're gonna get to week one,

1:07:04.640 --> 1:07:06.320
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna throw it all out, right. How many times

1:07:06.360 --> 1:07:07.919
<v Speaker 1>do we kind of say that when we're talking about

1:07:07.920 --> 1:07:09.960
<v Speaker 1>the team? Do you ever remember? And we've only been

1:07:09.960 --> 1:07:11.360
<v Speaker 1>doing this for six years, but I think that's a

1:07:11.400 --> 1:07:14.480
<v Speaker 1>decent sample size. You remember the last time Week one?

1:07:14.520 --> 1:07:18.520
<v Speaker 1>It was the takes from training camp to the game

1:07:18.800 --> 1:07:19.920
<v Speaker 1>were so seamless.

1:07:20.080 --> 1:07:22.360
<v Speaker 2>I think last year we knew the offense was a disaster.

1:07:22.880 --> 1:07:24.240
<v Speaker 1>We didn't know it was that bad. I think we

1:07:24.280 --> 1:07:25.480
<v Speaker 1>did okay, but it wasn't.

1:07:26.360 --> 1:07:30.320
<v Speaker 2>Maybe we didn't. We were still I'll speak for myself,

1:07:30.880 --> 1:07:33.520
<v Speaker 2>I was still rose colored glasses a little bit last year,

1:07:33.760 --> 1:07:36.000
<v Speaker 2>so maybe I didn't see it, but I think it

1:07:36.520 --> 1:07:38.400
<v Speaker 2>was gonna be that bad. But I think that we

1:07:38.440 --> 1:07:39.200
<v Speaker 2>should have seen that.

1:07:39.280 --> 1:07:41.280
<v Speaker 1>But there was also stuffs like they'd added Parker and

1:07:41.320 --> 1:07:43.880
<v Speaker 1>it was like, okay, they've done that, and Remandre and

1:07:43.920 --> 1:07:45.880
<v Speaker 1>like I think he had a bigger role expected.

1:07:46.040 --> 1:07:48.400
<v Speaker 2>We knew this. The system and the coaching.

1:07:48.120 --> 1:07:50.520
<v Speaker 1>Was but this was like, I mean, like the game

1:07:51.840 --> 1:07:54.040
<v Speaker 1>could not have happened and the talking points would be

1:07:54.080 --> 1:07:56.000
<v Speaker 1>exactly the same if we were just carrying on another

1:07:56.000 --> 1:07:59.919
<v Speaker 1>week from camp. Nothing changed, And that's weird for week one.

1:08:00.440 --> 1:08:02.080
<v Speaker 1>Usually week one changes things.

1:08:02.400 --> 1:08:04.640
<v Speaker 2>Okay, I'll give you that. All right, let's go back

1:08:04.640 --> 1:08:06.800
<v Speaker 2>to the phones. Mason's in Connecticut. What's up, Mason?

1:08:07.680 --> 1:08:08.880
<v Speaker 5>How you guys doing good?

1:08:09.320 --> 1:08:09.520
<v Speaker 8>Hey?

1:08:09.920 --> 1:08:11.240
<v Speaker 9>All right, so I gotta get this out quick. I

1:08:11.280 --> 1:08:13.760
<v Speaker 9>actually have to leave in a second. But Evan, I

1:08:13.840 --> 1:08:16.559
<v Speaker 9>know that you're not a Kashan Boody guy, and I

1:08:16.560 --> 1:08:19.000
<v Speaker 9>get it. I understand. I agree with you that he

1:08:19.040 --> 1:08:20.120
<v Speaker 9>didn't look great on Sunday.

1:08:20.160 --> 1:08:20.880
<v Speaker 8>Okay, he made some.

1:08:20.840 --> 1:08:23.160
<v Speaker 9>Mistake obviously, had the two pass, he didn't get his

1:08:23.160 --> 1:08:25.680
<v Speaker 9>feet down. More importantly, I think on the second one

1:08:25.800 --> 1:08:27.560
<v Speaker 9>last play of the game, I think he ran a

1:08:27.640 --> 1:08:29.320
<v Speaker 9>lazy route. I think if he runs a stem hard

1:08:29.320 --> 1:08:31.160
<v Speaker 9>there and he sells vertical, I don't think Joe breaks

1:08:31.200 --> 1:08:33.960
<v Speaker 9>on it fast enough to push him out of bounds. However,

1:08:34.479 --> 1:08:36.479
<v Speaker 9>for the guys starting in his first NFL game that

1:08:36.520 --> 1:08:39.160
<v Speaker 9>who was kind of playing out a position, Okay, I

1:08:39.160 --> 1:08:42.640
<v Speaker 9>think there were times where he attacked leverage well. I

1:08:42.680 --> 1:08:44.640
<v Speaker 9>think he looked like he was thinking out there a

1:08:44.640 --> 1:08:47.800
<v Speaker 9>lot of times. I think he showed explosiveness off line

1:08:47.800 --> 1:08:49.840
<v Speaker 9>of scrimmage a few times, which was a question mark

1:08:49.920 --> 1:08:52.800
<v Speaker 9>for him coming into this season. I think specifically on

1:08:52.800 --> 1:08:55.240
<v Speaker 9>one of the touchdowns of Kendrick Bourne, he was running

1:08:55.320 --> 1:08:58.000
<v Speaker 9>a curl on the right side of the formation and

1:08:58.040 --> 1:09:00.400
<v Speaker 9>he looked explos off line of scrimmage. I think he

1:09:00.479 --> 1:09:03.800
<v Speaker 9>ran the stem hard, he had a good snapdown, a

1:09:03.840 --> 1:09:05.759
<v Speaker 9>good trigger step, came out of it in three steps.

1:09:06.080 --> 1:09:10.080
<v Speaker 9>I think there were some things to feel good about

1:09:10.320 --> 1:09:13.120
<v Speaker 9>in this game for Kashan Booty, and I think he

1:09:13.160 --> 1:09:15.640
<v Speaker 9>could be a guy and listen before I go, I

1:09:15.680 --> 1:09:17.479
<v Speaker 9>just want to let you guys know it's not too

1:09:17.560 --> 1:09:20.160
<v Speaker 9>late to get on the Kaishan Boody bandwag Okay, I

1:09:20.200 --> 1:09:22.800
<v Speaker 9>want to personally invite you guys to the Kaishan Boody

1:09:22.800 --> 1:09:25.080
<v Speaker 9>Bank Club. We call ourselves the Booty Clap Bandit. The

1:09:25.160 --> 1:09:27.719
<v Speaker 9>door is open the winner circle. Guys, all right, thank.

1:09:27.560 --> 1:09:29.880
<v Speaker 2>You, Thanks, good call, Mason, good call. A lot of

1:09:29.880 --> 1:09:32.479
<v Speaker 2>really good points about Kashan Booty. I agree with you

1:09:32.520 --> 1:09:35.840
<v Speaker 2>wholeheartedly about the last route. Could have ran it faster,

1:09:35.960 --> 1:09:37.679
<v Speaker 2>could have ran it better. Yeah, I'm sure he feels

1:09:37.720 --> 1:09:39.760
<v Speaker 2>the same way. I'm not breaking any news to him.

1:09:40.200 --> 1:09:44.080
<v Speaker 2>Uh what he said about him playing out a position

1:09:44.640 --> 1:09:46.280
<v Speaker 2>agree one percent.

1:09:46.479 --> 1:09:48.200
<v Speaker 1>Some we targed it they didn't have a second true x.

1:09:48.280 --> 1:09:50.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. And I wrote this in after further review that

1:09:50.680 --> 1:09:53.719
<v Speaker 2>I actually don't hold anything against Kaishan Booty on Sunday

1:09:54.200 --> 1:09:55.160
<v Speaker 2>for that exact reason.

1:09:55.160 --> 1:09:56.679
<v Speaker 1>Even though at the beginning of the show you said

1:09:56.680 --> 1:09:57.080
<v Speaker 1>he was bad.

1:09:57.240 --> 1:09:58.800
<v Speaker 2>I didn't say it was bad. I just said, like,

1:09:59.120 --> 1:10:01.559
<v Speaker 2>you can't really give kaish On Boody like a pass.

1:10:02.040 --> 1:10:02.439
<v Speaker 2>That's fair.

1:10:02.520 --> 1:10:03.240
<v Speaker 1>I No, it's fair.

1:10:03.400 --> 1:10:05.760
<v Speaker 2>I just like I mean, the film was the film, Like,

1:10:06.000 --> 1:10:09.320
<v Speaker 2>you know, I agree with the caller that it wasn't hopeless,

1:10:09.640 --> 1:10:12.439
<v Speaker 2>but I just felt like I wrote it in after

1:10:12.520 --> 1:10:16.080
<v Speaker 2>further review that I hold nothing against Kaishan Boody because

1:10:16.120 --> 1:10:18.040
<v Speaker 2>to me, we've talked about this a lot with him,

1:10:18.040 --> 1:10:21.080
<v Speaker 2>even before they drafted him. He's a Z slot like,

1:10:21.160 --> 1:10:24.080
<v Speaker 2>he's an inside player that had to be forced to

1:10:24.080 --> 1:10:28.360
<v Speaker 2>play on the outside because DeVante Parker's hurt Juju is

1:10:28.560 --> 1:10:31.720
<v Speaker 2>whatever and Tykwon Thwarton's on IR so they had no

1:10:31.840 --> 1:10:35.280
<v Speaker 2>other X receiver besides Kaishan Boody. They obviously weren't going

1:10:35.320 --> 1:10:37.800
<v Speaker 2>to play Pop Douglas at the X, so it made

1:10:38.000 --> 1:10:39.599
<v Speaker 2>all the sense in the world that it was Booty.

1:10:39.640 --> 1:10:41.800
<v Speaker 2>We all thought it would be Booty coming into the game,

1:10:41.840 --> 1:10:44.120
<v Speaker 2>and it was. And I agree with the caller one

1:10:44.160 --> 1:10:46.439
<v Speaker 2>hundred and ten percent that that's not on him that

1:10:46.560 --> 1:10:48.760
<v Speaker 2>he doesn't know how to to tap the sideline when

1:10:48.760 --> 1:10:50.599
<v Speaker 2>he's probably done it like six times in his life

1:10:50.720 --> 1:10:53.160
<v Speaker 2>in a game, So I don't blame him at all

1:10:53.200 --> 1:10:56.519
<v Speaker 2>for it. I didn't necessarily see the explosiveness. Maybe I

1:10:56.600 --> 1:10:58.639
<v Speaker 2>have to go back and watch some of his routes

1:10:58.640 --> 1:11:01.320
<v Speaker 2>that the caller talked about and I think that some

1:11:01.360 --> 1:11:03.720
<v Speaker 2>of the route running was a little bit sloppy. So

1:11:03.760 --> 1:11:06.800
<v Speaker 2>that's where I come from with Booty. I don't mind

1:11:06.800 --> 1:11:06.960
<v Speaker 2>do you.

1:11:06.920 --> 1:11:09.720
<v Speaker 1>Think this route running in the second half specifically, I.

1:11:09.680 --> 1:11:12.559
<v Speaker 2>Thought there was one route in particular where he tried

1:11:12.600 --> 1:11:14.880
<v Speaker 2>to run an out and up and I thought that

1:11:14.960 --> 1:11:16.920
<v Speaker 2>maybe he had a chance to get open on it

1:11:16.960 --> 1:11:19.320
<v Speaker 2>because he was single covered and he just didn't really

1:11:19.360 --> 1:11:21.639
<v Speaker 2>sell it all that well and just kind of rolled

1:11:21.640 --> 1:11:23.719
<v Speaker 2>into the defender and it was kind of pretty ugly.

1:11:24.280 --> 1:11:27.280
<v Speaker 2>That was late in the game. I actually thought looking

1:11:27.360 --> 1:11:29.200
<v Speaker 2>back on it, and I'm sure it was a locked route,

1:11:29.200 --> 1:11:31.160
<v Speaker 2>so I don't think he had like the eruption to like,

1:11:31.760 --> 1:11:33.719
<v Speaker 2>if he had just hit like a three step slant,

1:11:33.960 --> 1:11:35.479
<v Speaker 2>I think it would have been more effective than what

1:11:35.520 --> 1:11:36.280
<v Speaker 2>he ended up doing.

1:11:36.520 --> 1:11:39.120
<v Speaker 1>Okay, I'm just saying because I the first half, a

1:11:39.120 --> 1:11:41.519
<v Speaker 1>lot of guys are slipping around with the rain. When

1:11:41.560 --> 1:11:42.920
<v Speaker 1>I looked at the route running stuff like I did

1:11:42.920 --> 1:11:44.880
<v Speaker 1>this with Douglas too, I was just I really only

1:11:44.880 --> 1:11:45.760
<v Speaker 1>looked at the second half.

1:11:45.880 --> 1:11:48.599
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so I felt like some of his routes were

1:11:48.920 --> 1:11:52.960
<v Speaker 2>not crisp and not really he doesn't to me, he

1:11:53.000 --> 1:11:56.600
<v Speaker 2>doesn't have a ton of suddenness in his break or

1:11:56.680 --> 1:11:59.439
<v Speaker 2>at the top of the route unless he's running he

1:11:59.640 --> 1:12:04.360
<v Speaker 2>is I can trying to be more positive. He is

1:12:04.400 --> 1:12:08.040
<v Speaker 2>a great slant route runner. Yeah, he runs great slants,

1:12:08.400 --> 1:12:11.599
<v Speaker 2>but when he gets down the field eight twelve yard breaks,

1:12:11.920 --> 1:12:16.120
<v Speaker 2>there's just not a whole lot of sell or wiggle

1:12:16.240 --> 1:12:18.559
<v Speaker 2>to those types of routes. But if you're asking him

1:12:18.560 --> 1:12:20.639
<v Speaker 2>to run a slant like we saw it in Green Bay,

1:12:20.840 --> 1:12:23.880
<v Speaker 2>he runs great slants, So maybe that's something to build

1:12:23.920 --> 1:12:26.920
<v Speaker 2>off of. And I think it's comfortability too, Like you

1:12:26.960 --> 1:12:29.160
<v Speaker 2>can tell that he's so comfortable running a three or

1:12:29.200 --> 1:12:32.280
<v Speaker 2>five step slant that it just looks explosive when he

1:12:32.320 --> 1:12:34.720
<v Speaker 2>does it because he's he runs that route like it's

1:12:34.760 --> 1:12:38.479
<v Speaker 2>the back of his hand. I wasn't like overly like,

1:12:38.520 --> 1:12:40.840
<v Speaker 2>oh my god, take him off the field with Kisehan Boody,

1:12:41.400 --> 1:12:44.320
<v Speaker 2>But I just I feel like there's I don't know,

1:12:44.400 --> 1:12:46.479
<v Speaker 2>I don't necessarily know if I see the twitch or

1:12:46.479 --> 1:12:50.080
<v Speaker 2>the explosiveness to be a real dynamic receiver in the league.

1:12:50.200 --> 1:12:52.920
<v Speaker 2>Can he be like a fourth or fifth receiver for

1:12:53.000 --> 1:12:56.960
<v Speaker 2>his rookie contract. Absolutely, I think that we're at that point.

1:12:56.800 --> 1:12:58.840
<v Speaker 1>And in the sixth round. Fine, Yeah, it's not like

1:12:58.840 --> 1:12:59.800
<v Speaker 1>they took him top fifty.

1:13:00.000 --> 1:13:01.759
<v Speaker 2>All right, Jeff is in Maine. What's up, Jeff?

1:13:03.120 --> 1:13:03.840
<v Speaker 10>Hey, what's going on?

1:13:03.880 --> 1:13:04.120
<v Speaker 3>Guys?

1:13:04.160 --> 1:13:05.559
<v Speaker 2>Hey?

1:13:05.680 --> 1:13:08.559
<v Speaker 10>So I had a couple of things. One, Alex, I

1:13:08.560 --> 1:13:13.360
<v Speaker 10>got a college football player for you, Okay, Tristan keenan

1:13:13.720 --> 1:13:20.519
<v Speaker 10>Umane kind of like the true freshman. I don't I doubt,

1:13:20.600 --> 1:13:23.880
<v Speaker 10>I mean from knowing means football team historically, I doubt

1:13:23.880 --> 1:13:25.600
<v Speaker 10>he's an NFL talent. But he's kind of like a

1:13:25.640 --> 1:13:31.640
<v Speaker 10>faster Rex Burkhead. He's fun to watch, okay. And so

1:13:32.320 --> 1:13:34.960
<v Speaker 10>the thing for the Pats, And I know you guys

1:13:34.960 --> 1:13:39.120
<v Speaker 10>wanted to transition to defense against personnel like Miami, and

1:13:39.200 --> 1:13:41.479
<v Speaker 10>I know that this show has always been a proponent

1:13:41.520 --> 1:13:43.720
<v Speaker 10>of playing Marte Mapu at the second level, and I

1:13:43.800 --> 1:13:48.320
<v Speaker 10>have two He played well at safety the first game,

1:13:48.360 --> 1:13:51.920
<v Speaker 10>I thought, But I think with this game, and I'm

1:13:51.920 --> 1:13:55.240
<v Speaker 10>curious what you guys think, it makes more sense to

1:13:55.280 --> 1:13:58.639
<v Speaker 10>me to keep him at the second level because I

1:13:58.680 --> 1:14:02.720
<v Speaker 10>think if your linebackers are and obviously their past game

1:14:02.760 --> 1:14:05.720
<v Speaker 10>is incredible, but I think if your linebackers are to

1:14:05.920 --> 1:14:12.719
<v Speaker 10>buy and Bentley, Raheem Moster and Devin and Shane are

1:14:12.760 --> 1:14:17.360
<v Speaker 10>just gonna absolutely run away from them, and I think

1:14:17.360 --> 1:14:19.040
<v Speaker 10>that would be a problem. And so I think that

1:14:20.000 --> 1:14:25.600
<v Speaker 10>you know what, the true secondary players handle the receivers

1:14:25.880 --> 1:14:29.479
<v Speaker 10>and you know, move him to the second level to

1:14:29.680 --> 1:14:32.840
<v Speaker 10>try to stop those running backs from absolutely eating you alive.

1:14:32.920 --> 1:14:36.240
<v Speaker 2>Thanks guys, Yeah, that's an interesting point, Thanks Jeff, And

1:14:36.240 --> 1:14:39.160
<v Speaker 2>I did want to transition here to the Dolphins for

1:14:39.200 --> 1:14:42.000
<v Speaker 2>the last half hour of the show and preview the

1:14:42.040 --> 1:14:45.519
<v Speaker 2>Dolphins a little bit. This is a this is the

1:14:45.560 --> 1:14:48.400
<v Speaker 2>conundrum for the Patriots with the Dolphins and the Patriots defense.

1:14:49.520 --> 1:14:55.519
<v Speaker 2>In my opinion, you have to put a ton of

1:14:55.520 --> 1:14:58.800
<v Speaker 2>help on Tyreek Hill. So if you're gonna help a

1:14:58.800 --> 1:15:01.479
<v Speaker 2>ton to Tyreek Hill, and I I say help because

1:15:01.479 --> 1:15:04.920
<v Speaker 2>I don't love calling it a double team, Like I

1:15:04.920 --> 1:15:08.040
<v Speaker 2>don't think it's like necessarily a double team. But at

1:15:08.080 --> 1:15:11.680
<v Speaker 2>the very very least, the post safety has to be

1:15:11.760 --> 1:15:14.920
<v Speaker 2>dedicated to number ten, right, Like the post safety has

1:15:14.960 --> 1:15:17.200
<v Speaker 2>to have eyes on number ten at all times. That's

1:15:17.240 --> 1:15:19.120
<v Speaker 2>just the bottom line, because it's not fair to Jonathan

1:15:19.160 --> 1:15:21.120
<v Speaker 2>Jones to leave him out there on an island against

1:15:21.200 --> 1:15:24.640
<v Speaker 2>Hill all the time. So here's the conundrum, right for

1:15:24.720 --> 1:15:27.880
<v Speaker 2>the Patriots in this game. And I'm curious about your

1:15:27.880 --> 1:15:29.479
<v Speaker 2>take on this, because we had a lot of people,

1:15:29.520 --> 1:15:32.160
<v Speaker 2>Alex that called into the show last week, and I

1:15:32.200 --> 1:15:33.960
<v Speaker 2>know a lot of people on my Twitter I'm sure

1:15:34.000 --> 1:15:37.360
<v Speaker 2>your twitter feed as well that were not confident in

1:15:38.160 --> 1:15:41.840
<v Speaker 2>leaving Christian Gonzales one on one with AJ Brown in

1:15:42.120 --> 1:15:45.519
<v Speaker 2>Sunday's game. Yeah, and they did for the most part,

1:15:45.600 --> 1:15:49.920
<v Speaker 2>and he held up pretty well. So different type of

1:15:49.960 --> 1:15:55.120
<v Speaker 2>receiver with Jalen Waddle. Yeah, And that's the question, are

1:15:55.160 --> 1:16:01.000
<v Speaker 2>you confident in Gonzales? I would think, or maybe it's

1:16:01.000 --> 1:16:03.639
<v Speaker 2>Marcus Jones if you want the speed on speed matchup,

1:16:03.680 --> 1:16:09.680
<v Speaker 2>but either one taking Wattle, it's never truly on an

1:16:09.720 --> 1:16:16.920
<v Speaker 2>island but without the real resource, right yeah? Or are

1:16:16.960 --> 1:16:20.040
<v Speaker 2>you emptying the box? And if most of it was

1:16:20.080 --> 1:16:21.719
<v Speaker 2>a d MP yesterday, I don't know if he's gonna

1:16:21.720 --> 1:16:24.599
<v Speaker 2>play in this game. A shame's a fast running back,

1:16:24.680 --> 1:16:27.000
<v Speaker 2>like the caller said, explosive guy ran like a four

1:16:27.120 --> 1:16:30.760
<v Speaker 2>three eight or something like that. Really speed guy. Are

1:16:31.240 --> 1:16:34.080
<v Speaker 2>you either empty the box and whatever they get to

1:16:34.160 --> 1:16:36.360
<v Speaker 2>the backs of the backfield, the run game, all that

1:16:36.439 --> 1:16:41.120
<v Speaker 2>kind of stuff you live with or you live with

1:16:41.200 --> 1:16:43.960
<v Speaker 2>being one on one on Wattley.

1:16:44.160 --> 1:16:46.840
<v Speaker 1>I let him run the ball, me too. I let

1:16:46.920 --> 1:16:49.240
<v Speaker 1>him beat your running the ball. And look, I maybe

1:16:49.280 --> 1:16:51.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm being too optimistic here. And Evan, I know

1:16:51.880 --> 1:16:53.800
<v Speaker 1>you think Sunday's performance should go down as one of

1:16:53.840 --> 1:16:56.479
<v Speaker 1>the worst in Patriots history. But I liked what I saw.

1:16:56.880 --> 1:16:59.320
<v Speaker 1>I liked what I saw from the defensive line. And

1:16:59.680 --> 1:17:03.879
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying you're going to shut them down without

1:17:04.240 --> 1:17:08.160
<v Speaker 1>additional players in the box against the run. But is

1:17:08.200 --> 1:17:09.479
<v Speaker 1>their offensive line that great?

1:17:09.720 --> 1:17:10.600
<v Speaker 2>I don't, especially not.

1:17:12.120 --> 1:17:15.559
<v Speaker 1>Out there right, So give me you know, Keon White,

1:17:15.760 --> 1:17:18.360
<v Speaker 1>Christian Barmore really good game, probably better run game than

1:17:18.400 --> 1:17:18.800
<v Speaker 1>pass game.

1:17:18.880 --> 1:17:21.800
<v Speaker 2>Christian Barmer had a sneaky good game. It wasn't a

1:17:21.880 --> 1:17:22.640
<v Speaker 2>game you like.

1:17:22.960 --> 1:17:25.320
<v Speaker 1>It was a classic Christian Barmore game. Because people always

1:17:25.320 --> 1:17:27.599
<v Speaker 1>complain that he doesn't have enough stats, but he's always

1:17:27.640 --> 1:17:31.160
<v Speaker 1>like the jude On sack early is a perfect example.

1:17:32.280 --> 1:17:33.000
<v Speaker 2>He's right there.

1:17:33.080 --> 1:17:35.519
<v Speaker 1>He created that even though he didn't get stat Give

1:17:35.520 --> 1:17:38.200
<v Speaker 1>me Christian Barmore, give me key On White, give me

1:17:38.560 --> 1:17:41.320
<v Speaker 1>uh Tetrick Wise would a good game minus the penalties,

1:17:41.320 --> 1:17:44.559
<v Speaker 1>which were big. It doesn't, but right Juwan Bentley, give

1:17:44.600 --> 1:17:47.200
<v Speaker 1>me those guys up front, those four I think they

1:17:47.240 --> 1:17:50.120
<v Speaker 1>do enough. If you're going to give them the run

1:17:50.200 --> 1:17:53.000
<v Speaker 1>and basically put those four guys sort of on an

1:17:53.040 --> 1:17:57.880
<v Speaker 1>island against the run and put the resources in the secondary. Again,

1:17:58.200 --> 1:17:59.640
<v Speaker 1>you're not gonna shut him down. It's not like you're

1:17:59.640 --> 1:18:01.519
<v Speaker 1>going to run for like three yards to carry. But

1:18:02.080 --> 1:18:04.440
<v Speaker 1>I think that keeps it very manageable.

1:18:04.520 --> 1:18:06.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so they're gonna they're gonna play a lot of

1:18:06.120 --> 1:18:08.240
<v Speaker 2>zone in this game. I guarantee it. They're gonna play

1:18:08.240 --> 1:18:10.000
<v Speaker 2>a lot of soft zone and they're gonna try to

1:18:10.080 --> 1:18:13.040
<v Speaker 2>keep the top on the defense. Yeah. Cover two quarters like,

1:18:13.080 --> 1:18:15.840
<v Speaker 2>they'll mix that in Cover three, they're gonna play a

1:18:15.880 --> 1:18:19.160
<v Speaker 2>ton of zone. Uh when they go to man or

1:18:20.120 --> 1:18:23.360
<v Speaker 2>basically man. There's two coverages that I think that that

1:18:23.720 --> 1:18:26.040
<v Speaker 2>exist that I think would be good in this matchup.

1:18:26.080 --> 1:18:28.160
<v Speaker 2>One is what they used last year, which is one

1:18:28.200 --> 1:18:32.400
<v Speaker 2>cross It's one robber, but the robber is looking for

1:18:32.439 --> 1:18:35.559
<v Speaker 2>the crosser from the passing string, and when he picks

1:18:35.680 --> 1:18:39.000
<v Speaker 2>up the crosser, the man coverage defender on the receiver

1:18:39.360 --> 1:18:41.840
<v Speaker 2>drops off and becomes the new robber. He replaces him

1:18:41.840 --> 1:18:43.760
<v Speaker 2>in the middle of the field in the coverage. So

1:18:44.040 --> 1:18:48.759
<v Speaker 2>that takes away things like a crosser with a dig

1:18:48.960 --> 1:18:52.040
<v Speaker 2>from the outside, because now that defender that falls off

1:18:52.120 --> 1:18:54.160
<v Speaker 2>is gonna fall off into the dig window, so you

1:18:54.240 --> 1:18:56.519
<v Speaker 2>can take away both things. So they did that a

1:18:56.560 --> 1:18:58.840
<v Speaker 2>lot because this Miami team, just like when they played

1:18:58.920 --> 1:19:02.360
<v Speaker 2>Kansas City with Tyreek Hill, they know that they're gonna

1:19:02.439 --> 1:19:04.960
<v Speaker 2>run crossing routes. It's either're gonna be Hill or waddle,

1:19:04.960 --> 1:19:08.320
<v Speaker 2>but somebody is running across or I guarantee it, so

1:19:08.439 --> 1:19:10.840
<v Speaker 2>they're gonna They could do that. They could play one

1:19:10.880 --> 1:19:12.920
<v Speaker 2>cross and they could cut off the crossing route and

1:19:12.920 --> 1:19:14.840
<v Speaker 2>then have the post safety over the top to help

1:19:14.880 --> 1:19:17.519
<v Speaker 2>the Tyreek. Uh. The other thing that they could do

1:19:18.520 --> 1:19:21.120
<v Speaker 2>is play a Saban coverage, which is called cover seven.

1:19:21.840 --> 1:19:25.559
<v Speaker 2>Cover seven is too high safety and each safety is

1:19:25.600 --> 1:19:29.160
<v Speaker 2>bracketing a different guy, so they can actually double team

1:19:29.560 --> 1:19:30.280
<v Speaker 2>both players.

1:19:30.479 --> 1:19:30.599
<v Speaker 10>Right.

1:19:31.120 --> 1:19:33.800
<v Speaker 2>The problem with cover seven is that you'll give up

1:19:33.800 --> 1:19:35.280
<v Speaker 2>two hundred yards on the ground if you.

1:19:35.200 --> 1:19:38.840
<v Speaker 1>Play what runs against like Kiffen and Yeah in those.

1:19:38.800 --> 1:19:40.640
<v Speaker 2>Saban loves it. He runs it a lot more in

1:19:40.680 --> 1:19:42.639
<v Speaker 2>college because of obvious differences.

1:19:42.880 --> 1:19:45.520
<v Speaker 1>He runs it against the teams Yeah.

1:19:45.200 --> 1:19:49.479
<v Speaker 2>And they So basically you will have a cone bracket

1:19:49.520 --> 1:19:52.080
<v Speaker 2>is what they call it, an inside out bracket on

1:19:52.439 --> 1:19:56.080
<v Speaker 2>both Wattle and Hill. You can call that on like

1:19:56.120 --> 1:19:58.160
<v Speaker 2>third and long because you know they're not gonna run it.

1:19:58.600 --> 1:20:00.160
<v Speaker 2>But if you call that on first down and then

1:20:00.160 --> 1:20:03.479
<v Speaker 2>they're gonna run for two hundred yards, does it matter

1:20:03.920 --> 1:20:06.360
<v Speaker 2>if they run for two hundred yards. I'm not necessarily

1:20:06.439 --> 1:20:08.200
<v Speaker 2>sold it matters.

1:20:08.240 --> 1:20:10.400
<v Speaker 1>So it as long as the game's close, it doesn't

1:20:10.439 --> 1:20:12.080
<v Speaker 1>matter if you let them if they get a multi

1:20:12.160 --> 1:20:15.760
<v Speaker 1>score lead, of course, right. But no, I if the

1:20:15.800 --> 1:20:18.760
<v Speaker 1>ball's not in Tira Killing Jalen Waddle's hands and the

1:20:18.800 --> 1:20:20.519
<v Speaker 1>other you can't get beat on the RPOs. That's the

1:20:20.560 --> 1:20:23.280
<v Speaker 1>other thing on these coverages you're describing. Go to that.

1:20:24.800 --> 1:20:27.559
<v Speaker 1>If the ball's not in those guys' hands, let them

1:20:27.600 --> 1:20:29.120
<v Speaker 1>run the ball up and down the field. The other

1:20:29.160 --> 1:20:31.559
<v Speaker 1>thing I've noticed about to him this is I'm debuting

1:20:31.600 --> 1:20:33.160
<v Speaker 1>this take here, so I don't know, feel free to

1:20:33.200 --> 1:20:39.479
<v Speaker 1>push back. I don't want to put this. Do you remember,

1:20:40.560 --> 1:20:42.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't know when you stopped playing two K, but

1:20:43.720 --> 1:20:45.360
<v Speaker 1>they put a thing in where like players are like

1:20:45.360 --> 1:20:48.160
<v Speaker 1>different badges, so it was like not overalls. Okay, do

1:20:48.200 --> 1:20:51.080
<v Speaker 1>you remember the microwave badge? So it was like certain

1:20:51.120 --> 1:20:54.519
<v Speaker 1>players if you kept shooting with them, they'd get better.

1:20:54.840 --> 1:20:56.320
<v Speaker 1>But if you only took a shot with them. Every

1:20:56.360 --> 1:20:58.880
<v Speaker 1>once in a while they'd actually play worse. Two was

1:20:58.960 --> 1:21:01.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of a microwave faster. I like that a little

1:21:01.040 --> 1:21:03.559
<v Speaker 1>bit like this when he how many pass take? How

1:21:03.560 --> 1:21:05.160
<v Speaker 1>many passes did he throw last week? I don't know

1:21:05.160 --> 1:21:07.479
<v Speaker 1>the exact number it was, It was a lot. Yeah,

1:21:07.960 --> 1:21:09.559
<v Speaker 1>I want to actually find the exact number. And I

1:21:09.560 --> 1:21:11.840
<v Speaker 1>think that's part of the reason. Yeah, through forty five

1:21:11.840 --> 1:21:14.000
<v Speaker 1>passes last year. I think that's part of the reason

1:21:14.000 --> 1:21:15.960
<v Speaker 1>he played so well is because he can get in

1:21:16.040 --> 1:21:18.519
<v Speaker 1>that rhythm where it's drop back pass, drop back pass,

1:21:18.600 --> 1:21:23.040
<v Speaker 1>drop back pass. If you're forcing them to run the ball,

1:21:23.560 --> 1:21:26.000
<v Speaker 1>not just call runs, but also hand the ball off

1:21:26.040 --> 1:21:29.360
<v Speaker 1>on those RPOs. He's not a guy that throws great

1:21:29.360 --> 1:21:32.519
<v Speaker 1>when he's cold. If it's the fifth, sixth, seventh play

1:21:32.520 --> 1:21:33.880
<v Speaker 1>of a drive and he's thrown a pass for the

1:21:33.880 --> 1:21:36.720
<v Speaker 1>first time, this is a very good take. I don't

1:21:36.760 --> 1:21:38.720
<v Speaker 1>have any numbers to back this up, unfortunately, it's just

1:21:38.720 --> 1:21:41.200
<v Speaker 1>something I've noticed. But this is that you've noticed that,

1:21:41.600 --> 1:21:42.760
<v Speaker 1>so you've noticed that from him too.

1:21:43.600 --> 1:21:47.120
<v Speaker 2>It anecdotally it sounds great. Also, I'm sorry they're showing

1:21:47.120 --> 1:21:49.120
<v Speaker 2>Brady on this TV right now. Oh yeah, And my

1:21:49.120 --> 1:21:52.439
<v Speaker 2>favorite part of this entire thing is just watch Stacy

1:21:52.720 --> 1:21:56.760
<v Speaker 2>the whole time, just panicking that the second half is

1:21:56.760 --> 1:21:59.360
<v Speaker 2>about to start and they need to get off Brady

1:21:59.400 --> 1:22:02.439
<v Speaker 2>off the field, and CBS is just like refusing to

1:22:02.479 --> 1:22:05.080
<v Speaker 2>get him off the field. I will get he was

1:22:05.160 --> 1:22:07.840
<v Speaker 2>just on the screen and I we both love Stacey.

1:22:08.200 --> 1:22:10.320
<v Speaker 2>It's hilarious to watch him just like be like, we

1:22:10.360 --> 1:22:12.960
<v Speaker 2>gotta go, we gotta go, you gotta go. We'll get

1:22:12.960 --> 1:22:14.360
<v Speaker 2>to Brady in a second. I do want to end

1:22:14.360 --> 1:22:16.320
<v Speaker 2>the show with our takes on on the on the

1:22:16.360 --> 1:22:20.640
<v Speaker 2>Brady stuff. Uh, it's a really anecdotally. I feel like

1:22:20.640 --> 1:22:22.400
<v Speaker 2>you're right. So I don't even I don't have any

1:22:22.439 --> 1:22:23.000
<v Speaker 2>numbers either.

1:22:23.160 --> 1:22:25.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what the numbers would be to back

1:22:25.800 --> 1:22:29.120
<v Speaker 1>that up, because his is him throwing a lot of passes.

1:22:29.160 --> 1:22:32.080
<v Speaker 1>Doesn't like, Yeah, it could be it was intermittent early

1:22:32.120 --> 1:22:33.800
<v Speaker 1>and now they're behind so they have no choice but

1:22:33.880 --> 1:22:37.120
<v Speaker 1>to throw. But like, I feel like he needs to

1:22:37.120 --> 1:22:38.960
<v Speaker 1>get in a rhythm. And when he gets in a rhythm,

1:22:39.200 --> 1:22:40.759
<v Speaker 1>and it makes sense with all those kind of short

1:22:40.760 --> 1:22:42.800
<v Speaker 1>crossing patterns, yeah, it's all very repeatable.

1:22:42.920 --> 1:22:45.840
<v Speaker 2>He throws that. So they want him and this is

1:22:45.880 --> 1:22:48.719
<v Speaker 2>the challenge and what what made that game so good

1:22:49.479 --> 1:22:52.720
<v Speaker 2>against the Chargers was that he wants to throw the

1:22:52.760 --> 1:22:54.600
<v Speaker 2>inbreakers to the middle of the field right, so a

1:22:54.640 --> 1:22:58.040
<v Speaker 2>lot like Mac Jones in that sense, crossing routes, dig rats,

1:22:58.080 --> 1:23:00.559
<v Speaker 2>slant routes like that's too a, that's that's his bread

1:23:00.560 --> 1:23:04.040
<v Speaker 2>and butter. What made this game unique against the Chargers,

1:23:04.040 --> 1:23:06.120
<v Speaker 2>and I know that I've kind of gushed about to

1:23:06.160 --> 1:23:08.320
<v Speaker 2>it today, but he was really freaking good in this game.

1:23:08.960 --> 1:23:11.120
<v Speaker 2>What made him really good in this game was the

1:23:11.160 --> 1:23:17.280
<v Speaker 2>fact that he was able to come off the crossers

1:23:17.280 --> 1:23:19.559
<v Speaker 2>and off the slants and hit the second and third

1:23:19.600 --> 1:23:22.240
<v Speaker 2>read in the progression just as well as he normally

1:23:22.280 --> 1:23:24.680
<v Speaker 2>hits the slants right like he he made a throw.

1:23:24.720 --> 1:23:26.839
<v Speaker 2>I know, Ben Solak like broke it down on Twitter

1:23:27.320 --> 1:23:30.000
<v Speaker 2>where they take away the incut and he comes off

1:23:30.000 --> 1:23:32.200
<v Speaker 2>the incut and hits a wheel to Tyreek kill on

1:23:32.240 --> 1:23:32.800
<v Speaker 2>the second reads.

1:23:32.880 --> 1:23:35.280
<v Speaker 1>Well, the other thing about is he's this has been

1:23:35.280 --> 1:23:37.120
<v Speaker 1>my long standing take onto it. You know this he

1:23:37.200 --> 1:23:39.519
<v Speaker 1>essentially had to relearn how to throw a football because

1:23:39.520 --> 1:23:42.360
<v Speaker 1>he hit injury. I feel like he's kind of gotten there.

1:23:42.479 --> 1:23:44.439
<v Speaker 2>I feel like he threw the ball with as much

1:23:44.560 --> 1:23:45.960
<v Speaker 2>zip on it as I've ever seen him throw.

1:23:46.040 --> 1:23:48.000
<v Speaker 1>Well, that's what I'm saying, Like he people don't realize

1:23:48.040 --> 1:23:50.679
<v Speaker 1>he had to rebuild his mechanics from the ground up,

1:23:51.120 --> 1:23:55.240
<v Speaker 1>like in the NFL. That is a massive task. Yeah,

1:23:55.280 --> 1:23:56.880
<v Speaker 1>he was really good in this game, and I feel

1:23:56.920 --> 1:23:57.920
<v Speaker 1>like he's kind of gotten there.

1:23:58.000 --> 1:24:01.679
<v Speaker 2>So that's the thing with two. But the reason why

1:24:01.960 --> 1:24:04.680
<v Speaker 2>I love your take so much is because that's the

1:24:04.760 --> 1:24:08.160
<v Speaker 2>type of thing that Bill will notice if Bill notices

1:24:08.920 --> 1:24:13.920
<v Speaker 2>to Bill's great at noticing one, Like where's your heat map? Like,

1:24:14.000 --> 1:24:16.160
<v Speaker 2>where's like the hot areas of the field that you

1:24:16.280 --> 1:24:19.080
<v Speaker 2>love throwing to, like a like a batter in baseball? Right,

1:24:19.560 --> 1:24:22.720
<v Speaker 2>where do I pitch to you? So with Tua, he's

1:24:22.720 --> 1:24:24.599
<v Speaker 2>gonna take away the middle of the field. We can

1:24:24.640 --> 1:24:26.679
<v Speaker 2>guarantee that he's gonna take away the middle of the field,

1:24:26.680 --> 1:24:29.120
<v Speaker 2>and he's gonna take away Tyreek Hill, and he's gonna

1:24:29.280 --> 1:24:32.639
<v Speaker 2>he's gonna be he's gonna force you to play left handed

1:24:32.680 --> 1:24:35.320
<v Speaker 2>from that perspective, and or should say right handed. I

1:24:35.360 --> 1:24:38.000
<v Speaker 2>guess he's going to force two to play right handed

1:24:38.160 --> 1:24:40.599
<v Speaker 2>in that respect. He's not gonna let him throw the slants.

1:24:40.600 --> 1:24:42.479
<v Speaker 2>He's not gonna let him throw the crosses. He's not

1:24:42.479 --> 1:24:44.920
<v Speaker 2>gonna let him throw to number ten, Like that's gonna

1:24:44.920 --> 1:24:51.519
<v Speaker 2>be the game plan. So that take you just had

1:24:51.640 --> 1:24:53.519
<v Speaker 2>is like something that Bill would notice too, in the

1:24:53.560 --> 1:24:57.360
<v Speaker 2>sense that, well, if we if we don't let him

1:24:57.360 --> 1:24:59.720
<v Speaker 2>throw the ball early and we like it, make him

1:24:59.720 --> 1:25:02.560
<v Speaker 2>handed off or we take I would like, well, I

1:25:02.600 --> 1:25:04.400
<v Speaker 2>almost wonder if they take the ball now, you know

1:25:04.400 --> 1:25:06.120
<v Speaker 2>what I mean, like if we keep them cold.

1:25:06.280 --> 1:25:10.200
<v Speaker 1>It's not even that it's like because it's not so

1:25:10.240 --> 1:25:11.280
<v Speaker 1>much like going to the bench and all that. I

1:25:11.320 --> 1:25:12.000
<v Speaker 1>guess maybe it is.

1:25:12.040 --> 1:25:12.360
<v Speaker 2>I don't know.

1:25:12.400 --> 1:25:13.200
<v Speaker 1>I just feel like.

1:25:13.320 --> 1:25:15.599
<v Speaker 2>If he's probably ways to keep them cold.

1:25:15.479 --> 1:25:17.439
<v Speaker 1>He's probably not alone in this. But it's more like

1:25:18.080 --> 1:25:21.280
<v Speaker 1>if they go run run now it's third and eight, Yeah,

1:25:22.479 --> 1:25:24.439
<v Speaker 1>I feel like that versus like if he threw the

1:25:24.479 --> 1:25:28.560
<v Speaker 1>first two right, that kind of thing, right, And I

1:25:28.880 --> 1:25:32.880
<v Speaker 1>wonder if you just you basically don't it's it's their offense.

1:25:33.360 --> 1:25:35.040
<v Speaker 1>I know people are gonna hate this take because it's

1:25:35.080 --> 1:25:38.800
<v Speaker 1>all complex and you know, cutting edge whatever. It's a

1:25:38.840 --> 1:25:41.840
<v Speaker 1>little repetitive from the quarterback position. Like you said, it's

1:25:41.880 --> 1:25:44.800
<v Speaker 1>just it's slant incut, slant in cut, and it's three

1:25:44.840 --> 1:25:48.760
<v Speaker 1>step back foot throw, three step back Mechanically mentally there's

1:25:48.800 --> 1:25:51.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot going on, but for the quarterback in that offense,

1:25:51.160 --> 1:25:54.360
<v Speaker 1>it's very mechanically repetitive. I think when you so, maybe

1:25:54.360 --> 1:25:56.400
<v Speaker 1>this is more about the offense than it is two. Yeah,

1:25:56.520 --> 1:25:58.519
<v Speaker 1>I guess I kind of talked through this take here.

1:25:59.120 --> 1:26:02.280
<v Speaker 1>I think that if you let him get into that rhythm,

1:26:02.720 --> 1:26:05.880
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna start feeling it and it just sort of becomes.

1:26:05.600 --> 1:26:08.720
<v Speaker 2>Well, second, interesting to see what they do, because I

1:26:08.720 --> 1:26:10.439
<v Speaker 2>think that there's like a bunch of different ways you

1:26:10.479 --> 1:26:13.560
<v Speaker 2>could obviously go about it. But like if the Patriots

1:26:13.680 --> 1:26:16.639
<v Speaker 2>empty the box and ask them to run the ball,

1:26:16.880 --> 1:26:19.240
<v Speaker 2>that would be one sign. If the Patriots come after

1:26:19.320 --> 1:26:21.680
<v Speaker 2>him early, I think that's another sign of like, let's

1:26:21.760 --> 1:26:24.040
<v Speaker 2>rattle him, let's get him off his game early by

1:26:24.040 --> 1:26:27.240
<v Speaker 2>pressuring them. That's another sign that that maybe they feel

1:26:27.280 --> 1:26:30.120
<v Speaker 2>the same way. And I also wonder about like mcdaniels's

1:26:30.520 --> 1:26:35.559
<v Speaker 2>McDaniels McDaniels uh script, Like does he does he throw early?

1:26:36.080 --> 1:26:39.400
<v Speaker 2>Like they're a pretty aggressive throwing team. They Yeah, so

1:26:39.439 --> 1:26:42.080
<v Speaker 2>that you know Daniel does want to run? Yeah, you

1:26:42.080 --> 1:26:44.640
<v Speaker 2>know those stats that are like you know, over expected,

1:26:44.640 --> 1:26:46.400
<v Speaker 2>like how often they throw the ball and downs and

1:26:46.439 --> 1:26:49.040
<v Speaker 2>distances over expected. He pulls his eyes.

1:26:49.400 --> 1:26:50.200
<v Speaker 1>Uh, stupid.

1:26:50.240 --> 1:26:52.559
<v Speaker 2>They're they're always like near the top of the league

1:26:52.560 --> 1:26:56.160
<v Speaker 2>and the so so it's like Buffalo Kansas City like teams.

1:26:55.960 --> 1:26:57.960
<v Speaker 1>Well and especially like if they don't have most are

1:26:58.200 --> 1:27:01.080
<v Speaker 1>even more reason for them to keep it in here.

1:27:01.080 --> 1:27:03.320
<v Speaker 2>All right, let's get back to the calls. It's Forward

1:27:03.520 --> 1:27:04.920
<v Speaker 2>in Georgia. What's up Forward?

1:27:06.720 --> 1:27:11.639
<v Speaker 8>Hey, alex Evan, how are you guys doing. I love

1:27:11.680 --> 1:27:14.800
<v Speaker 8>the podcast first time callers following in.

1:27:16.840 --> 1:27:17.160
<v Speaker 6>Heaven.

1:27:17.560 --> 1:27:21.200
<v Speaker 8>You know what, keep on bringing those truth bombs. Man,

1:27:21.880 --> 1:27:24.800
<v Speaker 8>you just say what do you see? Because that's what

1:27:24.840 --> 1:27:27.280
<v Speaker 8>I like. So don't let the beast get you down.

1:27:28.560 --> 1:27:31.000
<v Speaker 2>We'll do Mike.

1:27:31.600 --> 1:27:36.280
<v Speaker 8>Here's the take. So your podcast is fabulous. That's you know,

1:27:36.400 --> 1:27:39.800
<v Speaker 8>the micro This is kind of a macro take. We've

1:27:39.840 --> 1:27:43.920
<v Speaker 8>had great continuity on defense a few the past few years,

1:27:44.200 --> 1:27:49.360
<v Speaker 8>and we've had pretty good continuity on offense disregarding the

1:27:49.360 --> 1:27:53.640
<v Speaker 8>offensive coordinator. Once of the players have been together, what

1:27:53.680 --> 1:27:57.960
<v Speaker 8>do you guys think about this team being kind of

1:27:58.040 --> 1:28:01.240
<v Speaker 8>like a basketball player where they need to see a

1:28:01.360 --> 1:28:02.200
<v Speaker 8>shot and go in.

1:28:03.040 --> 1:28:06.639
<v Speaker 6>You get over the hump. Yeah, if they could just

1:28:06.680 --> 1:28:11.040
<v Speaker 6>win one game like they played last Sunday, just win

1:28:11.160 --> 1:28:13.559
<v Speaker 6>one of those games leveling up.

1:28:14.080 --> 1:28:15.760
<v Speaker 1>Well, that's a really good take that be.

1:28:15.960 --> 1:28:18.200
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for the call for it. Appreciate you listening as well. Yeah,

1:28:18.240 --> 1:28:20.160
<v Speaker 2>it's like, you know, the floodgates opening, Yeah, right, like

1:28:20.160 --> 1:28:21.479
<v Speaker 2>you hit one and then all of a sudden, you

1:28:21.560 --> 1:28:22.920
<v Speaker 2>hit a million. I get them.

1:28:22.960 --> 1:28:24.760
<v Speaker 1>That was literally, I mean I'm sitting up on the

1:28:24.760 --> 1:28:26.519
<v Speaker 1>because I'm like formulating the stuff this game goes on.

1:28:26.560 --> 1:28:28.080
<v Speaker 1>That was gonna be my take if they won, was

1:28:28.120 --> 1:28:30.160
<v Speaker 1>they finally saw one go in and now let's like

1:28:30.600 --> 1:28:32.360
<v Speaker 1>they've done it, they know they can do it. I

1:28:32.680 --> 1:28:34.599
<v Speaker 1>think that would have been massive, And I think there

1:28:34.640 --> 1:28:37.720
<v Speaker 1>is something to that. The problem is, is it by

1:28:37.760 --> 1:28:39.599
<v Speaker 1>the time that happens is going to be too little,

1:28:39.600 --> 1:28:42.439
<v Speaker 1>too late. Yeah, you know, if they win that first

1:28:42.479 --> 1:28:47.720
<v Speaker 1>such game in week ten, right and they're four and six, right,

1:28:48.400 --> 1:28:51.000
<v Speaker 1>like Nicole, all right, but it's gonna matter if they

1:28:51.000 --> 1:28:53.360
<v Speaker 1>do it this week. Yeah, I think that there's absolutely

1:28:53.439 --> 1:28:54.040
<v Speaker 1>something to that.

1:28:54.120 --> 1:28:55.880
<v Speaker 2>I think that's the other part of Yeah, I'm glad

1:28:55.880 --> 1:28:57.160
<v Speaker 2>you kind of put it that way, because I think

1:28:57.200 --> 1:28:59.679
<v Speaker 2>that's another part about my frustration overall with the team

1:29:00.400 --> 1:29:04.280
<v Speaker 2>is their first month of the schedule now just got

1:29:04.360 --> 1:29:06.320
<v Speaker 2>easier because of what happened in New York, right, But

1:29:06.400 --> 1:29:08.800
<v Speaker 2>their first month of the schedule is tough. Yeah, it's

1:29:08.840 --> 1:29:12.080
<v Speaker 2>super hard. So I knew coming into this first month

1:29:12.360 --> 1:29:14.439
<v Speaker 2>that if they were gonna have a season, they were

1:29:14.479 --> 1:29:16.360
<v Speaker 2>gonna have to come out hot, like they were gonna

1:29:16.360 --> 1:29:18.920
<v Speaker 2>have to come out and at least stay afloat and

1:29:19.000 --> 1:29:22.000
<v Speaker 2>tread water in the first month of the year. Now

1:29:22.000 --> 1:29:24.280
<v Speaker 2>they're already go in one, and you just worry, like,

1:29:24.360 --> 1:29:26.960
<v Speaker 2>all right, maybe the Jets game now obviously looks a

1:29:26.960 --> 1:29:29.120
<v Speaker 2>lot easier, and I'm not ready to just hand them

1:29:29.120 --> 1:29:31.760
<v Speaker 2>a wa against the Jets, I'm not, but I think

1:29:31.760 --> 1:29:34.120
<v Speaker 2>that that's a game they should be favored in now.

1:29:34.479 --> 1:29:37.200
<v Speaker 2>But like one in three to me, with like three

1:29:38.000 --> 1:29:40.720
<v Speaker 2>competitive games and I said, no moral victories, but like

1:29:40.760 --> 1:29:45.200
<v Speaker 2>three competitive games against Miami, the Cowboys, and the Eagles

1:29:45.200 --> 1:29:48.400
<v Speaker 2>obviously already happened. Then I suppose that that's like at

1:29:48.479 --> 1:29:51.840
<v Speaker 2>least staying that's treading water, but really, like to tread

1:29:51.840 --> 1:29:53.840
<v Speaker 2>truly tread water, you gotta go to and two you

1:29:53.840 --> 1:29:54.160
<v Speaker 2>got one.

1:29:54.360 --> 1:29:58.680
<v Speaker 1>Yes, So I know people hate this staty. This is

1:29:58.720 --> 1:30:01.400
<v Speaker 1>like the ultimate negative. Gonna give the ultimate negative take now,

1:30:01.439 --> 1:30:05.400
<v Speaker 1>because anytime an NFL team loses its first game, you

1:30:05.439 --> 1:30:08.240
<v Speaker 1>hear that to two thing right, and its fans roll

1:30:08.320 --> 1:30:11.280
<v Speaker 1>their eyes. So last year, the Bengals actually made the

1:30:11.280 --> 1:30:13.519
<v Speaker 1>playoffs after going oh and two. They were the first

1:30:13.560 --> 1:30:17.200
<v Speaker 1>team to do it since twenty eighteen. The other there

1:30:17.200 --> 1:30:20.160
<v Speaker 1>were five other teams that went oh and two. Their

1:30:21.479 --> 1:30:24.400
<v Speaker 1>average wins for the season was just over six. If

1:30:24.400 --> 1:30:27.559
<v Speaker 1>you throw in the Colts and Texans who started one

1:30:27.600 --> 1:30:31.240
<v Speaker 1>and one, that win average drops below six games. So

1:30:31.640 --> 1:30:34.679
<v Speaker 1>that I feel like that takes off and framed wrong.

1:30:35.680 --> 1:30:38.040
<v Speaker 1>It's not to say if you start oh and too

1:30:38.120 --> 1:30:41.360
<v Speaker 1>you can't make the playoffs. You can. But like the

1:30:41.400 --> 1:30:44.280
<v Speaker 1>Bengals weren't an O and two team. We knew who

1:30:44.320 --> 1:30:46.120
<v Speaker 1>they were. It's not if you start oh and two

1:30:46.160 --> 1:30:48.880
<v Speaker 1>you can't make the playoffs. It's an zero and two

1:30:48.960 --> 1:30:53.000
<v Speaker 1>start is indicative of a team that's not good enough.

1:30:53.240 --> 1:30:56.360
<v Speaker 1>And that's where the concern comes in. It's not it

1:30:56.400 --> 1:30:59.639
<v Speaker 1>doesn't mean it's it's locked in. But we're talking about

1:30:59.680 --> 1:31:01.840
<v Speaker 1>again team like Cincinnati last year, who had been to

1:31:01.840 --> 1:31:04.639
<v Speaker 1>the Super Bowl. We knew who they were. I don't

1:31:04.680 --> 1:31:06.479
<v Speaker 1>think too many people were applying that zero to two

1:31:06.520 --> 1:31:08.240
<v Speaker 1>thing to them because we knew they could dig out

1:31:08.240 --> 1:31:10.479
<v Speaker 1>of it. Yeah, if this team starts oh and two,

1:31:11.439 --> 1:31:13.400
<v Speaker 1>it might just be a sign that that's the team

1:31:13.439 --> 1:31:13.720
<v Speaker 1>they are.

1:31:13.920 --> 1:31:16.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, especially against good teams right like, because they're

1:31:16.960 --> 1:31:20.320
<v Speaker 2>not playing cupcakes except maybe Zach Welson and the Jets.

1:31:20.680 --> 1:31:22.880
<v Speaker 2>A couple more things and then we have a couple

1:31:22.880 --> 1:31:24.479
<v Speaker 2>one more call than I do want to rap with

1:31:24.479 --> 1:31:26.920
<v Speaker 2>the Brady stuff. I do want to talk a little

1:31:26.920 --> 1:31:29.160
<v Speaker 2>bit more about the defense on Sunday and just are

1:31:29.360 --> 1:31:30.800
<v Speaker 2>kind of spin it for We talked a lot about

1:31:30.800 --> 1:31:33.320
<v Speaker 2>how they match up against Miami, which was good and

1:31:33.360 --> 1:31:36.160
<v Speaker 2>all that, but a Christian Zales and his debut, I'm

1:31:36.160 --> 1:31:37.680
<v Speaker 2>just going to kind of go rapid fire through a

1:31:37.680 --> 1:31:41.000
<v Speaker 2>couple guys, the plan and all that kind of stuff.

1:31:41.160 --> 1:31:43.400
<v Speaker 2>I wrote about that and after further review and our

1:31:43.400 --> 1:31:46.559
<v Speaker 2>film review a weekly piece, if you want to go

1:31:46.640 --> 1:31:48.600
<v Speaker 2>and look at how exactly they did it from like

1:31:48.640 --> 1:31:52.400
<v Speaker 2>a schematics perspective. But I thought, really what this game

1:31:52.520 --> 1:31:56.959
<v Speaker 2>made me most excited about defensively was they had Unlike offense,

1:31:57.280 --> 1:31:59.920
<v Speaker 2>they actually have individual players that I think are move

1:32:00.160 --> 1:32:04.040
<v Speaker 2>the needle for them defensively. Christian Gonzalez, I know, he

1:32:04.080 --> 1:32:06.280
<v Speaker 2>gave up seven catches in this game to a J

1:32:06.439 --> 1:32:09.799
<v Speaker 2>Brown but they were all short of the shorter variety.

1:32:09.840 --> 1:32:11.960
<v Speaker 2>He didn't give up a single deep ball and give

1:32:12.040 --> 1:32:14.640
<v Speaker 2>up a single run after catch play.

1:32:14.240 --> 1:32:15.760
<v Speaker 1>Like none of that kind of and he came up

1:32:15.800 --> 1:32:16.240
<v Speaker 1>and tackled.

1:32:16.560 --> 1:32:18.439
<v Speaker 2>I thought he played fantastic in this game.

1:32:18.520 --> 1:32:20.880
<v Speaker 1>I did for what it was like if he's playing

1:32:20.920 --> 1:32:25.799
<v Speaker 1>that way in three years, Yeah, for his first career game. Yeah,

1:32:25.840 --> 1:32:27.760
<v Speaker 1>with what I think the plan was probably don't get

1:32:27.760 --> 1:32:29.919
<v Speaker 1>beat deep if they make if they throw it underneath,

1:32:29.960 --> 1:32:31.640
<v Speaker 1>just step up, make that and against the receiver like

1:32:31.680 --> 1:32:33.559
<v Speaker 1>a J. Brown take that.

1:32:33.880 --> 1:32:34.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

1:32:34.280 --> 1:32:36.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I thought Christian Zalez was very good in this game.

1:32:37.000 --> 1:32:38.760
<v Speaker 1>I was excited about it. I don't think he was

1:32:38.800 --> 1:32:39.679
<v Speaker 1>their best rookie though.

1:32:40.120 --> 1:32:42.280
<v Speaker 2>Okay, I was going to get to maybe who I

1:32:42.280 --> 1:32:45.120
<v Speaker 2>think you think were you going in order the draft? Yes, yeah,

1:32:45.560 --> 1:32:48.120
<v Speaker 2>with Christian Gonzales. Just and then we'll move on to

1:32:48.240 --> 1:32:50.720
<v Speaker 2>the next one. Christian Goannzalez. What I liked so much

1:32:50.720 --> 1:32:55.439
<v Speaker 2>about his game was the tackling. Yeah, yeah, that was

1:32:55.479 --> 1:32:58.040
<v Speaker 2>a concern coming in with his physicality. I he didn't

1:32:58.080 --> 1:33:00.280
<v Speaker 2>really want to go there after the game, but I

1:33:00.320 --> 1:33:02.920
<v Speaker 2>think that you could tell that he wants. He knows

1:33:02.960 --> 1:33:04.920
<v Speaker 2>that that was the knock was that he wasn't a

1:33:04.920 --> 1:33:08.639
<v Speaker 2>physical guy and he couldn't tackle very well that Georgia game, right,

1:33:08.760 --> 1:33:11.360
<v Speaker 2>like yeah, all that kind of stuff that was the

1:33:11.439 --> 1:33:15.600
<v Speaker 2>knock and this game. Aj Brown is one of the

1:33:15.640 --> 1:33:16.840
<v Speaker 2>best yack receivers in the league.

1:33:16.920 --> 1:33:20.360
<v Speaker 1>And physically, I mean specimen yeah, Yeah, He's not a

1:33:20.400 --> 1:33:22.040
<v Speaker 1>guy who's gonna run around, he's gonna run through it.

1:33:22.160 --> 1:33:24.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and he was able to tackle m I think

1:33:24.080 --> 1:33:27.320
<v Speaker 2>that maybe other than the fourth down pass breakup, which

1:33:27.360 --> 1:33:30.280
<v Speaker 2>was great, he made a tackle on aj Brown coming

1:33:30.320 --> 1:33:33.360
<v Speaker 2>across the field on third down where aj Brown had

1:33:33.400 --> 1:33:35.360
<v Speaker 2>like a step on him coming across and he was

1:33:35.400 --> 1:33:37.280
<v Speaker 2>able to close and make the tackle well short of

1:33:37.320 --> 1:33:37.679
<v Speaker 2>the sticks.

1:33:37.760 --> 1:33:38.040
<v Speaker 8>Yeah.

1:33:38.120 --> 1:33:40.840
<v Speaker 2>That play there, I was like, that's a play that

1:33:41.200 --> 1:33:44.280
<v Speaker 2>if you asked a scout coming into the draft and

1:33:44.360 --> 1:33:46.719
<v Speaker 2>you said AJ Brown is going to have a step

1:33:46.720 --> 1:33:49.160
<v Speaker 2>on Christian Gonzalez coming across the field on like third

1:33:49.160 --> 1:33:52.200
<v Speaker 2>and nine at like third at like six yards of depth,

1:33:53.000 --> 1:33:55.240
<v Speaker 2>is it going to be a first down? Every scout

1:33:55.240 --> 1:33:58.160
<v Speaker 2>would say yes, yeah, every scout. And he made the tackle,

1:33:58.520 --> 1:34:01.160
<v Speaker 2>and I think that's a really good sign of a

1:34:01.200 --> 1:34:05.320
<v Speaker 2>play that he probably was told he can't make by

1:34:05.439 --> 1:34:08.000
<v Speaker 2>a lot of the scouts. And people like us, and

1:34:08.040 --> 1:34:09.760
<v Speaker 2>that he did make in the game, and that was

1:34:09.800 --> 1:34:12.360
<v Speaker 2>the most encouraging thing to me from that game. I

1:34:12.400 --> 1:34:14.280
<v Speaker 2>knew he could cover the deep ball. I knew he

1:34:14.320 --> 1:34:18.960
<v Speaker 2>would stay a decent you know, tightness, closeness to the receivers,

1:34:19.000 --> 1:34:21.320
<v Speaker 2>all that kind of stuff. But being able to come

1:34:21.400 --> 1:34:24.360
<v Speaker 2>up and make that tackle was huge. So you thought

1:34:24.400 --> 1:34:27.040
<v Speaker 2>the best rookie in this game was Keon White, Yeah, I.

1:34:26.960 --> 1:34:29.240
<v Speaker 1>Mean he was awesome. He was You look at what

1:34:29.280 --> 1:34:35.720
<v Speaker 1>he's doing to Lane Johnson. He is bull rushing Lane Johnson. Yeah,

1:34:35.760 --> 1:34:38.080
<v Speaker 1>it's he looks like he's been in the league five years. Yeah,

1:34:38.320 --> 1:34:41.160
<v Speaker 1>there's no rookie element. And he was a huge part

1:34:41.160 --> 1:34:44.479
<v Speaker 1>of their rush plan against Jalen Hurts. He executed his

1:34:44.560 --> 1:34:47.400
<v Speaker 1>plan at a high level. You know, he's he was

1:34:47.400 --> 1:34:50.080
<v Speaker 1>a problem. He was a problem in the Eagles back.

1:34:49.920 --> 1:34:52.360
<v Speaker 2>Bed four pressures in twenty three snaps, which is an

1:34:52.360 --> 1:34:53.640
<v Speaker 2>insane run outstand.

1:34:53.760 --> 1:34:57.560
<v Speaker 1>I I'm way too excited for what he's going to

1:34:57.600 --> 1:34:59.320
<v Speaker 1>be cut and that's in his first game. He's gonna

1:34:59.320 --> 1:35:01.360
<v Speaker 1>get better. Yeah, I'm way too excited for what he

1:35:01.400 --> 1:35:03.160
<v Speaker 1>can be. I they have a real guy here.

1:35:03.320 --> 1:35:05.680
<v Speaker 2>They need to play him as much as possible. And

1:35:05.720 --> 1:35:07.760
<v Speaker 2>I don't mean to like say like, oh, let's throw

1:35:07.800 --> 1:35:10.040
<v Speaker 2>the rookie into seventy snaps a game, Like if they

1:35:10.040 --> 1:35:12.080
<v Speaker 2>don't feel like he's ready, I feel like he's ready,

1:35:12.080 --> 1:35:15.599
<v Speaker 2>then you play him in the situation he looks ready. Yeah,

1:35:15.680 --> 1:35:17.639
<v Speaker 2>I think what what stands out about him?

1:35:17.920 --> 1:35:19.680
<v Speaker 1>Look right here is we're watching this and they have

1:35:19.720 --> 1:35:21.439
<v Speaker 1>the game on it. Right.

1:35:22.600 --> 1:35:25.080
<v Speaker 2>So he won four times in the past rush. Two

1:35:25.080 --> 1:35:27.559
<v Speaker 2>of them were with power just speed to power bowl

1:35:27.640 --> 1:35:31.280
<v Speaker 2>rush one on each tackle. Uh. Then he won with

1:35:31.360 --> 1:35:33.200
<v Speaker 2>an inside out move which I've seen him use in

1:35:33.520 --> 1:35:36.920
<v Speaker 2>practice and it's filthy. Uh just you know, a jude On,

1:35:37.520 --> 1:35:40.240
<v Speaker 2>It's a Judon move. He put fakes outside, comes back.

1:35:40.160 --> 1:35:42.000
<v Speaker 1>Real quick pause. What do you think of that move

1:35:42.200 --> 1:35:44.600
<v Speaker 1>that Miles Garrett pulled where he does like the basketball

1:35:44.680 --> 1:35:45.200
<v Speaker 1>came across.

1:35:45.800 --> 1:35:49.080
<v Speaker 2>I know he's he's he's a Miles Garrett's an alien

1:35:49.240 --> 1:35:52.800
<v Speaker 2>like Miles Garrett does not move like other people do. So, yeah,

1:35:52.840 --> 1:35:54.400
<v Speaker 2>he won with that. Then he won with speed around

1:35:54.400 --> 1:35:58.720
<v Speaker 2>the corner to speed rip around the corner. He he

1:35:58.800 --> 1:36:01.519
<v Speaker 2>made it look easy like he really did. He may

1:36:01.600 --> 1:36:04.800
<v Speaker 2>look easy and not only did I I really not

1:36:04.840 --> 1:36:08.160
<v Speaker 2>only is he just relentless, but the recovery talent to

1:36:08.320 --> 1:36:10.080
<v Speaker 2>like plant his foot in the ground and then go

1:36:10.200 --> 1:36:13.519
<v Speaker 2>chase Jalen Hurts. After Jalen Hurts, you know, leaves the pocket.

1:36:14.080 --> 1:36:14.760
<v Speaker 2>That's rare.

1:36:15.040 --> 1:36:17.120
<v Speaker 1>Like look, I know you just said nobody moves like

1:36:17.160 --> 1:36:19.479
<v Speaker 1>Miles Garrett and I'm not comparing him to Miles Garrett,

1:36:19.520 --> 1:36:22.040
<v Speaker 1>but like this isn't He doesn't move like you expect

1:36:22.040 --> 1:36:23.800
<v Speaker 1>a sixty five, two hundred and ninety pound got to move.

1:36:24.040 --> 1:36:26.479
<v Speaker 2>It's the change of direction for that really stands out.

1:36:26.520 --> 1:36:29.800
<v Speaker 2>Like the play that he bowl rushes mylotta. Yeah, and

1:36:29.840 --> 1:36:32.840
<v Speaker 2>then he's able to kind of recover and change directions

1:36:32.880 --> 1:36:36.719
<v Speaker 2>to then get Hurts up into the sideline. That's something

1:36:36.800 --> 1:36:40.200
<v Speaker 2>that their defensive line has been missing. Like Judean and

1:36:40.200 --> 1:36:44.439
<v Speaker 2>ouj and bar More can get downhill better than like

1:36:44.600 --> 1:36:48.120
<v Speaker 2>a lot of guys, but they then they lose contained right,

1:36:48.120 --> 1:36:49.800
<v Speaker 2>Like they don't recover as quickly as he.

1:36:50.000 --> 1:36:51.559
<v Speaker 1>So let me ask you this. You talk about getting

1:36:51.600 --> 1:36:53.040
<v Speaker 1>him on the field more, and how do you do that?

1:36:53.600 --> 1:36:53.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

1:36:54.080 --> 1:36:56.719
<v Speaker 1>Can he makes some of this work as an interior rusher?

1:36:57.120 --> 1:36:58.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? I would hope so, because that would be the

1:36:58.960 --> 1:37:01.040
<v Speaker 2>next step. I I think that with his hand in

1:37:01.080 --> 1:37:03.920
<v Speaker 2>the dirt. He crossed his face so quickly that he's

1:37:03.960 --> 1:37:06.280
<v Speaker 2>going to be really a problem with guards.

1:37:06.320 --> 1:37:07.880
<v Speaker 1>Doesn't even need to be hand in the dirty. You

1:37:07.880 --> 1:37:09.960
<v Speaker 1>could stand them up right, Yeah, we know they do that.

1:37:10.160 --> 1:37:12.400
<v Speaker 1>My point being like, do you think they can get

1:37:12.400 --> 1:37:14.000
<v Speaker 1>to the point And I know that they like to

1:37:14.040 --> 1:37:17.320
<v Speaker 1>put more guys back in these obvious passing situations, But

1:37:17.360 --> 1:37:19.840
<v Speaker 1>where you have a pass rush group of Jude on

1:37:19.920 --> 1:37:22.600
<v Speaker 1>and on the edge in Barmore and Keon White in

1:37:22.600 --> 1:37:25.040
<v Speaker 1>the middle, do you think that's something they can functionally

1:37:25.120 --> 1:37:28.360
<v Speaker 1>build because if they do, yeah, I mean, it'd be

1:37:28.360 --> 1:37:28.880
<v Speaker 1>pretty fun.

1:37:29.080 --> 1:37:29.280
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

1:37:29.400 --> 1:37:31.519
<v Speaker 2>I do wonder if, like you know, you've used like

1:37:31.560 --> 1:37:34.240
<v Speaker 2>the Trey Flowers like type of role comparison. I do

1:37:34.320 --> 1:37:38.280
<v Speaker 2>wonder at one point do they put Keon White at

1:37:38.280 --> 1:37:41.120
<v Speaker 2>the nose in that five rush package, you know, five

1:37:41.200 --> 1:37:44.400
<v Speaker 2>zero rush package that they use in that way that

1:37:44.479 --> 1:37:47.320
<v Speaker 2>they had like four guys standing up around Trey Flowers

1:37:47.320 --> 1:37:48.960
<v Speaker 2>and it was just Trey Flowers of his hand in

1:37:49.000 --> 1:37:49.320
<v Speaker 2>the well.

1:37:49.320 --> 1:37:51.679
<v Speaker 1>But couldn't you do that with bar more You could

1:37:51.760 --> 1:37:53.599
<v Speaker 1>and then have wipey one of the guys that's standing up.

1:37:53.640 --> 1:37:55.880
<v Speaker 2>You could, Yeah, yeah, any of that would be great.

1:37:56.200 --> 1:37:57.880
<v Speaker 1>I think all of that would be I just if

1:37:57.920 --> 1:37:59.240
<v Speaker 1>you can find a guy to get the find a

1:37:59.280 --> 1:38:00.800
<v Speaker 1>way to get those four guys on the field in

1:38:00.840 --> 1:38:03.760
<v Speaker 1>a pass rush situation, I mean, you can really do. So.

1:38:03.800 --> 1:38:05.639
<v Speaker 2>It's one of the better fronts in the league. Yeah,

1:38:05.720 --> 1:38:08.080
<v Speaker 2>I've been saying that all along about the Patriots defensive front.

1:38:08.360 --> 1:38:10.400
<v Speaker 2>They have one of the best defensive fronts in the NFL.

1:38:10.760 --> 1:38:14.080
<v Speaker 2>I don't think you know, Niners, Cowboys, Eagles like those

1:38:14.120 --> 1:38:17.080
<v Speaker 2>teams might have them beat. But other than that, I'd

1:38:17.120 --> 1:38:20.080
<v Speaker 2>probably take their front over everybody else. It's top five

1:38:20.280 --> 1:38:22.400
<v Speaker 2>in my opinion. All Right, So he talked about ke

1:38:22.560 --> 1:38:24.759
<v Speaker 2>Why we talked about Marty Mapu earlier in the show.

1:38:26.040 --> 1:38:30.559
<v Speaker 2>I do want to give Jawan Bentley his flowers, really

1:38:30.600 --> 1:38:35.040
<v Speaker 2>really good Juwan Bentley game. He's he's just a good

1:38:35.240 --> 1:38:39.599
<v Speaker 2>football player. He's just so good at taking on blocks

1:38:39.600 --> 1:38:43.280
<v Speaker 2>and condensing space in the running game. I really feel

1:38:43.320 --> 1:38:48.160
<v Speaker 2>like his development as a player and how fast he

1:38:48.240 --> 1:38:51.719
<v Speaker 2>plays now compared to how he early on in his career.

1:38:51.840 --> 1:38:54.280
<v Speaker 2>Like he could always hit, he could always come downhill,

1:38:54.320 --> 1:38:57.400
<v Speaker 2>but sometimes he looked like his feet were in cement right,

1:38:57.479 --> 1:38:59.679
<v Speaker 2>Like he looked like his feet were stuck he's such

1:38:59.720 --> 1:39:04.599
<v Speaker 2>a more explosive, like just flexible player then he then

1:39:04.640 --> 1:39:06.960
<v Speaker 2>he used to be. I really give him a lot

1:39:07.000 --> 1:39:10.160
<v Speaker 2>of credit. He's he's gotten so much better over the

1:39:10.200 --> 1:39:12.320
<v Speaker 2>course of his career. I played a great game in

1:39:12.360 --> 1:39:16.280
<v Speaker 2>this one. Uh is there anybody else? Si Jabriel Peppers.

1:39:16.240 --> 1:39:18.639
<v Speaker 1>Pepper, Yeah, yeah, he's going to be a player this year.

1:39:19.880 --> 1:39:22.800
<v Speaker 1>Miles Bryant. I thought playing a good game, which again

1:39:22.840 --> 1:39:24.840
<v Speaker 1>it's that thing I've been talking about. Don't well. So

1:39:24.880 --> 1:39:27.200
<v Speaker 1>it didn't start well because they'd a manning up Quez Watkins,

1:39:27.240 --> 1:39:28.360
<v Speaker 1>which he can't do well.

1:39:28.560 --> 1:39:30.040
<v Speaker 2>It was zone but yeah, okay, but.

1:39:30.040 --> 1:39:33.080
<v Speaker 1>Like, let him play a deeper zone, come up diagnose

1:39:34.360 --> 1:39:36.400
<v Speaker 1>like I meant that tackle and aj Brown.

1:39:36.520 --> 1:39:38.800
<v Speaker 2>He should be able to play the flat like it was. Okay,

1:39:38.840 --> 1:39:40.080
<v Speaker 2>it was our p but you get what.

1:39:40.120 --> 1:39:42.479
<v Speaker 1>You get what I'm saying, like, just let him let

1:39:42.520 --> 1:39:45.000
<v Speaker 1>him diagnose rather than chase. When you let him do that,

1:39:45.040 --> 1:39:46.160
<v Speaker 1>he actually does make plays.

1:39:46.160 --> 1:39:48.280
<v Speaker 2>All right, let's take the call from Patty. Who's Who's

1:39:48.320 --> 1:39:51.639
<v Speaker 2>had some good emails this week, Patty, some some interesting emails.

1:39:51.680 --> 1:39:52.559
<v Speaker 2>How you doing, Patty?

1:39:53.760 --> 1:39:57.960
<v Speaker 5>What's going on? Guys? Not much so I haven't listen.

1:39:58.040 --> 1:40:00.880
<v Speaker 5>I wasn't really coming after you the other day when

1:40:00.920 --> 1:40:04.040
<v Speaker 5>I emailed in, my whole point was, like the last

1:40:04.040 --> 1:40:08.639
<v Speaker 5>few years, I know, the end result was they didn't

1:40:08.720 --> 1:40:11.479
<v Speaker 5>get it done, and against good teams they haven't gotten

1:40:11.520 --> 1:40:14.439
<v Speaker 5>it done. But I think just comparing the last year

1:40:15.240 --> 1:40:17.400
<v Speaker 5>what I saw them do, Like, I think if this

1:40:17.600 --> 1:40:19.400
<v Speaker 5>was last year and they were down sixteen to nothing,

1:40:19.400 --> 1:40:21.439
<v Speaker 5>I would have just I would have been pulling my

1:40:21.479 --> 1:40:23.880
<v Speaker 5>hair out that they're gonna end up getting beat forty

1:40:23.920 --> 1:40:25.599
<v Speaker 5>five to nothing or forty five to ten.

1:40:25.479 --> 1:40:26.000
<v Speaker 10>In this game.

1:40:28.160 --> 1:40:30.920
<v Speaker 5>But you know, I did see some improvement. I thought,

1:40:31.040 --> 1:40:34.519
<v Speaker 5>even though like Mac got the ball out quick, the

1:40:34.560 --> 1:40:37.040
<v Speaker 5>fact that they started those two rookies, and those two

1:40:37.080 --> 1:40:40.760
<v Speaker 5>rookies also went up against those monsters on the defensive

1:40:40.760 --> 1:40:44.240
<v Speaker 5>line they played, I think everybody played a pretty good

1:40:44.280 --> 1:40:46.320
<v Speaker 5>game as far as like the offensive line.

1:40:46.479 --> 1:40:48.719
<v Speaker 2>Okay, I got to push back on that a little bit, Patty,

1:40:48.840 --> 1:40:51.040
<v Speaker 2>like their rookies in their first screw starts, I'm not

1:40:51.080 --> 1:40:54.640
<v Speaker 2>going to kill them, but keep going, keep going. I

1:40:54.640 --> 1:40:55.080
<v Speaker 2>don't want to.

1:40:56.160 --> 1:40:58.840
<v Speaker 5>And Mac, you're right. Mac has to play sixteen minutes,

1:40:59.200 --> 1:41:01.920
<v Speaker 5>has to play six minute game, can't play thirty minutes.

1:41:02.000 --> 1:41:07.080
<v Speaker 5>He can't play fifteen minutes and expect to win, but

1:41:07.560 --> 1:41:09.800
<v Speaker 5>you know that that's done and over week one is done.

1:41:11.800 --> 1:41:13.920
<v Speaker 5>I don't have a good feeling about this game. When

1:41:13.960 --> 1:41:17.679
<v Speaker 5>I looked at the injury report, I'm just like, come on, man,

1:41:18.280 --> 1:41:21.040
<v Speaker 5>like that we're already having offensive line lows now, our

1:41:21.120 --> 1:41:25.560
<v Speaker 5>starting left tackle, our starting center, and the rookie that

1:41:25.640 --> 1:41:28.200
<v Speaker 5>they had what was so playing right guard. He's that

1:41:28.320 --> 1:41:29.200
<v Speaker 5>they're not going to play.

1:41:30.439 --> 1:41:31.040
<v Speaker 10>I could see.

1:41:31.080 --> 1:41:36.519
<v Speaker 5>I could see a scenario, honestly where they just there's

1:41:36.600 --> 1:41:40.360
<v Speaker 5>too many turnovers and kind of like how they began

1:41:40.439 --> 1:41:44.800
<v Speaker 5>the game last week, where it's just they turned the

1:41:44.800 --> 1:41:47.120
<v Speaker 5>ball over a couple of times, Miami gets a few

1:41:47.200 --> 1:41:49.840
<v Speaker 5>quick scores and it's over because they can't block it.

1:41:50.000 --> 1:41:52.400
<v Speaker 5>And and I don't think Miami's defense is great by

1:41:52.439 --> 1:41:54.880
<v Speaker 5>any stretch of the imagination. I think Christian Wilkins is

1:41:54.880 --> 1:41:55.640
<v Speaker 5>a beast.

1:41:56.040 --> 1:41:56.200
<v Speaker 3>But.

1:41:57.960 --> 1:42:01.639
<v Speaker 5>Forget about it. You're can't block them, You're not gonna

1:42:01.640 --> 1:42:05.040
<v Speaker 5>freaking win, You're not gonna move the ball. I think

1:42:05.080 --> 1:42:07.040
<v Speaker 5>the Dolphins are one in this game. And I hate

1:42:07.040 --> 1:42:09.760
<v Speaker 5>to say, because they're my NFL Yankees, I hate them.

1:42:09.800 --> 1:42:12.920
<v Speaker 5>They're they're my least favorite sports team, even more so

1:42:13.040 --> 1:42:17.080
<v Speaker 5>than the Yankees, even more so than the Lakers. That's

1:42:17.120 --> 1:42:17.679
<v Speaker 5>all I got.

1:42:17.960 --> 1:42:20.040
<v Speaker 2>Thanks mate, thanks for the call. I didn't mean. I

1:42:20.080 --> 1:42:22.599
<v Speaker 2>don't want to trash the rookies because it's their first

1:42:22.640 --> 1:42:27.120
<v Speaker 2>career start. They're they're thrown into a tough situation. But

1:42:27.240 --> 1:42:29.559
<v Speaker 2>to categorize Mafi and so is playing well in that

1:42:29.640 --> 1:42:32.360
<v Speaker 2>game is not really telling the truths.

1:42:32.400 --> 1:42:34.800
<v Speaker 1>They played better than expectations. It doesn't mean they played well.

1:42:34.840 --> 1:42:36.600
<v Speaker 1>That's kind of how I put it. I actually I

1:42:37.640 --> 1:42:39.479
<v Speaker 1>texted you the number yard sday was it they ran for?

1:42:40.160 --> 1:42:42.200
<v Speaker 1>I think it was one point three yards per carry

1:42:42.240 --> 1:42:45.679
<v Speaker 1>between guards? Like, that's not they gave it done.

1:42:45.720 --> 1:42:48.360
<v Speaker 2>The two of them gave up twelve pressures between the

1:42:48.400 --> 1:42:48.720
<v Speaker 2>two of them.

1:42:48.760 --> 1:42:51.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, twelve twelve pressures one point three yards per carry. Look,

1:42:51.960 --> 1:42:53.760
<v Speaker 1>they didn't get mac Jones killed, and I think that's

1:42:53.840 --> 1:42:57.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of what the expectation was enough. So they played

1:42:57.160 --> 1:42:59.080
<v Speaker 1>better than that, and that's kind of the story of

1:42:59.080 --> 1:43:01.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot of things with the team's better than expectations.

1:43:01.479 --> 1:43:02.479
<v Speaker 1>But it doesn't mean it was good.

1:43:02.600 --> 1:43:05.360
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so uh good, good way to end it. On

1:43:05.400 --> 1:43:09.280
<v Speaker 2>the offensive line and then the Brady stuff offensive line,

1:43:10.200 --> 1:43:12.920
<v Speaker 2>What are we looking at on Sunday for this offensive line?

1:43:13.160 --> 1:43:16.240
<v Speaker 2>Assuming that the injuries hold.

1:43:16.600 --> 1:43:20.680
<v Speaker 1>I understand there all five like, like what are we

1:43:20.680 --> 1:43:21.120
<v Speaker 1>talking about?

1:43:21.120 --> 1:43:23.800
<v Speaker 2>We can talk about, but I understand where Patty's coming from,

1:43:23.800 --> 1:43:25.599
<v Speaker 2>where everybody's coming from, that they look at the injuries

1:43:25.600 --> 1:43:28.479
<v Speaker 2>of the offensive line and it's it's concerning. And I

1:43:28.720 --> 1:43:32.080
<v Speaker 2>picked the Dolphins in the game, but overall, in terms

1:43:32.120 --> 1:43:34.960
<v Speaker 2>of like the competitiveness of the game and keeping it close,

1:43:35.400 --> 1:43:38.759
<v Speaker 2>I actually am not overly concerned with the offensive line

1:43:38.760 --> 1:43:42.000
<v Speaker 2>because I really was impressed by how O'Brien and mack

1:43:42.120 --> 1:43:45.160
<v Speaker 2>was were able to manage it on Sunday, and I

1:43:45.200 --> 1:43:47.120
<v Speaker 2>don't think that this Dolphins front is as good as

1:43:47.120 --> 1:43:48.040
<v Speaker 2>the one they just went up there.

1:43:48.160 --> 1:43:49.600
<v Speaker 1>So I think that's a really good way to put it,

1:43:49.600 --> 1:43:52.040
<v Speaker 1>because what scares me about this offensive line they can

1:43:52.120 --> 1:43:54.280
<v Speaker 1>As we were watching the game, Kendrick Bourne takes off.

1:43:54.400 --> 1:43:56.479
<v Speaker 1>He's so good that hidden plan last year.

1:43:58.680 --> 1:44:00.720
<v Speaker 2>He won't let that go and I appreciate it.

1:44:01.120 --> 1:44:03.599
<v Speaker 1>Kv's my guy. I've said this for you. I will

1:44:03.600 --> 1:44:05.840
<v Speaker 1>find a spot for Kendrick Born on my team any day.

1:44:05.920 --> 1:44:08.200
<v Speaker 1>Guy like on and off the field, just what he thinks. Okay,

1:44:09.880 --> 1:44:11.920
<v Speaker 1>it's not so much that I'm worried about Mac Jones

1:44:12.200 --> 1:44:14.519
<v Speaker 1>being under pressure because he handled pressure well last week,

1:44:14.920 --> 1:44:16.559
<v Speaker 1>and like you just said, the big thing, they'll scheme

1:44:16.600 --> 1:44:20.639
<v Speaker 1>around it. Yeah, it's that fourth and three that you hated, right, Yeah,

1:44:20.680 --> 1:44:22.559
<v Speaker 1>why did that fourth and three happen? Because on third

1:44:22.560 --> 1:44:24.160
<v Speaker 1>and three they tried to I don't know if it

1:44:24.200 --> 1:44:26.360
<v Speaker 1>was technically half back dive, but like they went between

1:44:26.400 --> 1:44:28.759
<v Speaker 1>the guards with the Zegiel Elliot, he got stonewalled. Yeah,

1:44:28.880 --> 1:44:31.360
<v Speaker 1>that is my biggest concern with the offensive line. When

1:44:31.400 --> 1:44:34.879
<v Speaker 1>you need a yard to three yards, can the offensive

1:44:34.880 --> 1:44:37.600
<v Speaker 1>line and lie you to get that conventionally? Are you

1:44:37.680 --> 1:44:39.400
<v Speaker 1>going to be weird? Are you gonna have to do something?

1:44:39.840 --> 1:44:41.599
<v Speaker 1>That's what scares me more than anything else right now

1:44:41.640 --> 1:44:42.479
<v Speaker 1>with the offensive line.

1:44:42.800 --> 1:44:44.759
<v Speaker 2>The part of the reason why they dropped back fifty

1:44:44.760 --> 1:44:47.200
<v Speaker 2>eight times is because it was sixteen to nothing out

1:44:47.240 --> 1:44:49.120
<v Speaker 2>of the gate. But they also couldn't run the ball.

1:44:49.160 --> 1:44:52.360
<v Speaker 1>So that, by the way, in a way credit to O'Brien,

1:44:52.360 --> 1:44:54.240
<v Speaker 1>because last year they would not have made that adjustment.

1:44:54.320 --> 1:44:56.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and I think you know, the thing that I

1:44:56.400 --> 1:44:58.880
<v Speaker 2>like so much about O'Brien's offense is that, you know,

1:44:58.920 --> 1:45:01.320
<v Speaker 2>his quick game and his green game really operates as

1:45:01.360 --> 1:45:01.960
<v Speaker 2>an extension of.

1:45:01.960 --> 1:45:03.880
<v Speaker 1>The run, even though the other thing you said before,

1:45:04.479 --> 1:45:06.640
<v Speaker 1>you point out he's not afraid if something's working to

1:45:06.720 --> 1:45:09.240
<v Speaker 1>keep going back to it. Yeah, At the same time,

1:45:09.280 --> 1:45:11.000
<v Speaker 1>and this is probably kind of the same take from

1:45:11.040 --> 1:45:13.840
<v Speaker 1>a different angle. If something's not working, even if it's

1:45:13.840 --> 1:45:17.120
<v Speaker 1>something he likes, he'll understand it's not working and move on.

1:45:17.760 --> 1:45:20.000
<v Speaker 1>And they moved on from the run game last week.

1:45:20.400 --> 1:45:22.920
<v Speaker 1>You can't do that every week. At a certain point,

1:45:23.120 --> 1:45:24.800
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna have a third one where you just need

1:45:24.840 --> 1:45:27.479
<v Speaker 1>a pound at home and the offensive line needs to

1:45:27.479 --> 1:45:29.200
<v Speaker 1>allow needs to allow you to do that.

1:45:29.360 --> 1:45:31.840
<v Speaker 2>So for the group, Yeah, let's go over the configurations.

1:45:31.920 --> 1:45:35.759
<v Speaker 1>So Trent Brown and City so aren't playing like there's

1:45:35.840 --> 1:45:38.720
<v Speaker 1>just no way a week after concussion. I think you

1:45:38.760 --> 1:45:42.080
<v Speaker 1>move Calvin Anderson to left tackle first and foremost. But

1:45:43.320 --> 1:45:46.000
<v Speaker 1>what are the other offense Andrew Stuber? I think Andrew

1:45:46.000 --> 1:45:49.400
<v Speaker 1>Steuber is the only other tackle, right, All right, well,

1:45:49.479 --> 1:45:51.000
<v Speaker 1>you're moving Calvin Anderson to left tackle.

1:45:51.280 --> 1:45:53.840
<v Speaker 2>I thought Calvin Anderson initially on my initial watch, I

1:45:53.840 --> 1:45:57.040
<v Speaker 2>thought Calvin Anderson was fine. I watched the offensive line

1:45:57.080 --> 1:46:01.080
<v Speaker 2>alone again and he also at a rough game. Yeah,

1:46:01.240 --> 1:46:01.639
<v Speaker 2>keep going.

1:46:01.880 --> 1:46:03.720
<v Speaker 1>I I think some of it too, Like guys are

1:46:03.800 --> 1:46:06.920
<v Speaker 1>they brought down by like they are all kind of

1:46:07.000 --> 1:46:08.639
<v Speaker 1>we talk about guys elevating each other.

1:46:08.800 --> 1:46:11.160
<v Speaker 2>A lot of it too with him, in all fairness

1:46:11.280 --> 1:46:13.160
<v Speaker 2>is like you didn't have training companies out there for

1:46:13.560 --> 1:46:15.840
<v Speaker 2>plays on the week one in the conditioning. You know,

1:46:15.880 --> 1:46:18.559
<v Speaker 2>a lot of his his bad bad reps came in

1:46:18.560 --> 1:46:19.320
<v Speaker 2>the second half.

1:46:19.160 --> 1:46:21.240
<v Speaker 1>Which makes sense. Yeah, so all right, so you have

1:46:21.240 --> 1:46:24.599
<v Speaker 1>Callan Anderson left tackle. Let's let's let's do one. We're

1:46:24.880 --> 1:46:26.599
<v Speaker 1>outside of Andrews. None of the guys on the injury

1:46:26.600 --> 1:46:30.240
<v Speaker 1>report play, so you're you're still missing Cole Strange and

1:46:30.280 --> 1:46:33.479
<v Speaker 1>Mike Winning again. I think you're going Callan Anderson, ye,

1:46:35.000 --> 1:46:40.559
<v Speaker 1>Antonio Maffi, David Andrews. It's probably James Ferrence a right

1:46:40.760 --> 1:46:43.360
<v Speaker 1>guard is a practice squad elevation over Jake Andrews.

1:46:43.040 --> 1:46:44.919
<v Speaker 2>Right, I would think so. And then.

1:46:46.760 --> 1:46:50.400
<v Speaker 1>In your Varian Lowe Darian low at right tackle unless

1:46:50.400 --> 1:46:53.879
<v Speaker 1>he's not ready, in which case they probably recall Andrew stupid.

1:46:52.880 --> 1:46:55.760
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a chance to get two offensive line

1:46:55.800 --> 1:47:02.120
<v Speaker 1>recalls for this game anyway. Yeah, if honestly, it's probably

1:47:02.760 --> 1:47:04.920
<v Speaker 1>a one for one if either of those guards return.

1:47:05.760 --> 1:47:10.040
<v Speaker 1>Whoever returns, Mafi's in the other spot. Yep, right over Farence.

1:47:10.240 --> 1:47:12.160
<v Speaker 2>Yep. Mafi was.

1:47:14.200 --> 1:47:17.960
<v Speaker 1>Like, no, you didn't think so. Maybe it's just by comparison.

1:47:17.560 --> 1:47:21.720
<v Speaker 2>Jaileen Carter, just it's Carter, but that's that's every week.

1:47:21.760 --> 1:47:22.479
<v Speaker 2>This week it's Christian.

1:47:22.520 --> 1:47:27.120
<v Speaker 1>That's all right, all right, it's fair point, it's fair point. Well,

1:47:27.160 --> 1:47:28.799
<v Speaker 1>then do you think there's a chance to try Farence

1:47:28.800 --> 1:47:30.639
<v Speaker 1>and just be like, these rookies aren't ready, we're going.

1:47:30.680 --> 1:47:33.840
<v Speaker 2>I think believe to give him the reps and give

1:47:33.880 --> 1:47:36.320
<v Speaker 2>him the opportunity. The way that I look at Stranger

1:47:36.400 --> 1:47:39.400
<v Speaker 2>on Uh is that I think that if that was

1:47:40.200 --> 1:47:43.800
<v Speaker 2>a post Thanksgiving game, I'm not ready to say a

1:47:43.800 --> 1:47:46.679
<v Speaker 2>playoffs because let's fra it, you know, post Thanksgiving game.

1:47:47.040 --> 1:47:49.680
<v Speaker 1>I think the week seventeen against the Bills last year

1:47:49.680 --> 1:47:53.160
<v Speaker 1>winning in Okay, they play I I thought it was

1:47:53.360 --> 1:47:56.840
<v Speaker 1>very interesting when Bill was asked about them on Wednesday,

1:47:57.840 --> 1:47:59.760
<v Speaker 1>he said, you know, where are they gonna play? Sad

1:47:59.760 --> 1:48:02.480
<v Speaker 1>they'll eventually. It's a really.

1:48:02.280 --> 1:48:06.240
<v Speaker 2>Weird because I think one Bill with Bill, it's always

1:48:06.240 --> 1:48:08.480
<v Speaker 2>gamesman ship, right, he doesn't want to tell the Dolphins

1:48:08.520 --> 1:48:09.759
<v Speaker 2>anything but yeah.

1:48:09.600 --> 1:48:11.760
<v Speaker 1>But usually he just says they're out there practicing, you know.

1:48:11.800 --> 1:48:13.200
<v Speaker 1>With Andrew, I think the other.

1:48:13.080 --> 1:48:16.160
<v Speaker 2>Way to look at it is is that that's a

1:48:16.200 --> 1:48:20.960
<v Speaker 2>situation where it's bigger than a week two game against

1:48:20.960 --> 1:48:24.120
<v Speaker 2>Miami and these decisions to make about the long term

1:48:24.160 --> 1:48:28.559
<v Speaker 2>longevity of the player. But I think that my gut,

1:48:28.600 --> 1:48:31.360
<v Speaker 2>and this is not any inside information, my gut is

1:48:31.360 --> 1:48:33.760
<v Speaker 2>is that one of Stranger on when he will be

1:48:33.760 --> 1:48:34.000
<v Speaker 2>out there.

1:48:34.000 --> 1:48:35.800
<v Speaker 1>I feel like Strange is probably closer than when.

1:48:35.960 --> 1:48:38.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think if they're close and they can, it's

1:48:38.840 --> 1:48:43.240
<v Speaker 2>ninety five percent healthy that one of those guys will

1:48:43.240 --> 1:48:46.040
<v Speaker 2>play because they have to at this point, like they're

1:48:46.040 --> 1:48:50.559
<v Speaker 2>desperate for bodies, let alone just the talent level being different.

1:48:50.600 --> 1:48:52.240
<v Speaker 2>So I think one of those guys is going to

1:48:52.280 --> 1:48:54.800
<v Speaker 2>play on Sunday. So I agree with your line. If

1:48:54.840 --> 1:48:59.760
<v Speaker 2>nobody else plays, I think that you're probably in my

1:49:00.080 --> 1:49:05.080
<v Speaker 2>mind looking at Calvin Anderson, Cold Strange, David andrews Antonio,

1:49:05.080 --> 1:49:07.760
<v Speaker 2>Maffivederien Low from left to right. I think that on

1:49:07.840 --> 1:49:10.200
<v Speaker 2>Winny Will they'll continue to hold on winning out. But

1:49:10.640 --> 1:49:14.200
<v Speaker 2>I think Strangel will play on Sunday, just gut, not

1:49:14.360 --> 1:49:16.400
<v Speaker 2>no inside info on that, but I just I think

1:49:16.400 --> 1:49:20.479
<v Speaker 2>he will and really quickly. Also on the on the

1:49:20.520 --> 1:49:24.479
<v Speaker 2>offensive line, I gave David Andrews the gold Star at

1:49:24.479 --> 1:49:26.599
<v Speaker 2>the beginning of the show. But Trent Brown was also

1:49:26.640 --> 1:49:28.439
<v Speaker 2>really good in that game on Sunday too, which makes

1:49:28.439 --> 1:49:31.120
<v Speaker 2>the concussion even more of a bummer. He lost late

1:49:31.160 --> 1:49:34.880
<v Speaker 2>on that Josh Sweat sack, but other than that, he

1:49:35.080 --> 1:49:37.719
<v Speaker 2>was he was pretty good in that game, like old

1:49:37.760 --> 1:49:40.120
<v Speaker 2>Trent Brown, you know, one on one pass pro on

1:49:40.160 --> 1:49:43.599
<v Speaker 2>the backside and played really welled up, really well. So

1:49:43.680 --> 1:49:46.280
<v Speaker 2>hopefully that has a one week concussion and he's back

1:49:46.320 --> 1:49:48.679
<v Speaker 2>long term and it's it's nothing major to worry about,

1:49:48.840 --> 1:49:51.360
<v Speaker 2>all right, really quickly, we got three minutes before we

1:49:51.360 --> 1:49:54.680
<v Speaker 2>got a wrap on the Brady stuff. What what what?

1:49:55.040 --> 1:49:56.439
<v Speaker 2>Just what was your take? Closure?

1:49:57.240 --> 1:50:00.040
<v Speaker 1>Closure? It really it really was the thing. When he

1:50:00.040 --> 1:50:02.280
<v Speaker 1>he left, I remember it was like, you'll get Peyton

1:50:02.280 --> 1:50:05.200
<v Speaker 1>Manning And when's the last time Peyton Manning did anything

1:50:05.240 --> 1:50:08.479
<v Speaker 1>remotely related to the Indianapolis Colts. And it's like that

1:50:08.680 --> 1:50:10.439
<v Speaker 1>sucks because he's such a huge part of that franchise

1:50:10.439 --> 1:50:12.400
<v Speaker 1>and Brady's even bigger here. It's like I don't want

1:50:12.400 --> 1:50:14.000
<v Speaker 1>to lose him forever. I get he had to go

1:50:14.080 --> 1:50:15.800
<v Speaker 1>somewhere else to play, but it's like, is he just

1:50:15.840 --> 1:50:18.360
<v Speaker 1>gonna be a buck now and when he said, you know,

1:50:18.479 --> 1:50:21.320
<v Speaker 1>Patriot for life and to see him in the old

1:50:21.720 --> 1:50:25.360
<v Speaker 1>Jersey and actually do the rundown and all that and

1:50:25.400 --> 1:50:29.000
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna come back again, and just it was it's like,

1:50:29.040 --> 1:50:31.720
<v Speaker 1>all right, he's coming back, Like he's still here, He's

1:50:31.760 --> 1:50:33.439
<v Speaker 1>still a part of this. I get we have to

1:50:33.479 --> 1:50:35.080
<v Speaker 1>share him with Tampa. That's fine.

1:50:35.160 --> 1:50:35.439
<v Speaker 2>I don't know.

1:50:35.479 --> 1:50:37.760
<v Speaker 1>If we do well, that would be even better. No,

1:50:37.800 --> 1:50:39.840
<v Speaker 1>But like he did, he won a title there. He

1:50:39.960 --> 1:50:41.000
<v Speaker 1>there's an extent to that.

1:50:41.120 --> 1:50:44.160
<v Speaker 2>I don't I don't know if in Brady's so I

1:50:44.240 --> 1:50:47.160
<v Speaker 2>said at the end of the show, So what.

1:50:46.760 --> 1:50:48.880
<v Speaker 1>We know his time in Tampa was purely transactional.

1:50:48.960 --> 1:50:50.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and I think that's how he views it.

1:50:50.760 --> 1:50:53.200
<v Speaker 1>But but there's all like when they post like you

1:50:53.240 --> 1:50:55.160
<v Speaker 1>always see now, like the graphic of the seven Super

1:50:55.160 --> 1:50:57.800
<v Speaker 1>Bowls and there's like the Bucks logo on it, that's

1:50:57.840 --> 1:51:00.280
<v Speaker 1>what I mean, Like there'll always be that Tampa part

1:51:00.320 --> 1:51:04.320
<v Speaker 1>of it, but like he's he's still the Patriot for life.

1:51:04.439 --> 1:51:07.400
<v Speaker 1>I I is. It was it really like I texted

1:51:07.439 --> 1:51:09.800
<v Speaker 1>like two or three friends, like all of them after that,

1:51:09.840 --> 1:51:11.240
<v Speaker 1>and I was like that was closure, and they were

1:51:11.280 --> 1:51:13.240
<v Speaker 1>all like, that's exactly what it is. Yeah, it was

1:51:13.320 --> 1:51:16.360
<v Speaker 1>closure on Like rober Kraft said, we never properly got

1:51:16.360 --> 1:51:19.120
<v Speaker 1>to say goodbye. Yeah, and I think to do that

1:51:19.200 --> 1:51:21.160
<v Speaker 1>and to hear him say what he said, it felt good.

1:51:21.360 --> 1:51:23.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I said that. I was I was gonna be

1:51:23.760 --> 1:51:27.839
<v Speaker 2>body language doctor Brady, and he passed with flying color.

1:51:27.680 --> 1:51:31.599
<v Speaker 1>Pat body language, and like it wasn't There was no

1:51:31.760 --> 1:51:34.559
<v Speaker 1>cell job, he wasn't wearing TV twelve stuff. It didn't

1:51:34.560 --> 1:51:37.080
<v Speaker 1>feel like Hollywood, even like this is a stupid little

1:51:37.120 --> 1:51:39.840
<v Speaker 1>observation that I had. His hair was like it looked

1:51:39.840 --> 1:51:42.120
<v Speaker 1>like he just played a game. Like he looked up

1:51:42.120 --> 1:51:45.439
<v Speaker 1>on the no like himself, him standing up you know

1:51:45.479 --> 1:51:47.960
<v Speaker 1>because like him standing on the podium, like it gave

1:51:48.000 --> 1:51:50.639
<v Speaker 1>me a little deja vu to like seeing him pictures

1:51:50.680 --> 1:51:52.800
<v Speaker 1>of him on the podium after Super Bowls. It wasn't

1:51:52.840 --> 1:51:54.160
<v Speaker 1>like because I was thinking, like, is he gonna be

1:51:54.240 --> 1:51:55.680
<v Speaker 1>up there in a suit and he's gonna have the

1:51:55.720 --> 1:51:58.680
<v Speaker 1>five thousand dollars haircut, and you know he's gonna talk

1:51:58.720 --> 1:52:00.920
<v Speaker 1>about oh TV twelve now, Oh he went up there

1:52:00.920 --> 1:52:03.960
<v Speaker 1>in a jersey just looking like some guy and talked

1:52:04.000 --> 1:52:06.080
<v Speaker 1>about how much he loved it here. That was I

1:52:06.120 --> 1:52:07.800
<v Speaker 1>didn't think he would do that. I thought we would

1:52:07.800 --> 1:52:10.160
<v Speaker 1>get Corporate Tom. There was not one ounce of Corporate

1:52:10.160 --> 1:52:11.599
<v Speaker 1>Tom involved in that. It was awesome.

1:52:11.800 --> 1:52:16.519
<v Speaker 2>He uh he let himself, let the let the curtain

1:52:16.560 --> 1:52:19.080
<v Speaker 2>down a little bit. Yeah, he did. He did. And

1:52:19.120 --> 1:52:21.840
<v Speaker 2>I said, you know, I was gonna see like, was

1:52:21.880 --> 1:52:26.160
<v Speaker 2>this like you said Corporate Tom, was this I gotta

1:52:26.200 --> 1:52:29.000
<v Speaker 2>do this for mister Kraft because you know, twenty years

1:52:29.040 --> 1:52:30.920
<v Speaker 2>of paying me, like I kind of have to do this,

1:52:31.160 --> 1:52:35.200
<v Speaker 2>Like all right, I'll go No, this wasn't anything like that.

1:52:35.320 --> 1:52:38.679
<v Speaker 2>And I genuinely think that, based off of his reaction

1:52:38.840 --> 1:52:42.599
<v Speaker 2>and how he carried himself throughout the entire day, that

1:52:43.640 --> 1:52:47.800
<v Speaker 2>he identifies as a Patriot. I think he appreciates the

1:52:47.800 --> 1:52:50.720
<v Speaker 2>Bucks years, and he appreciates the Bucks for letting him

1:52:50.720 --> 1:52:54.400
<v Speaker 2>continue his career in the NFL post Patriots. But I

1:52:54.439 --> 1:52:58.599
<v Speaker 2>don't think that in his mind he has really anything

1:52:59.439 --> 1:53:02.200
<v Speaker 2>to do with the Bucks, if that makes sense, you know, Like,

1:53:02.280 --> 1:53:04.280
<v Speaker 2>I don't think that he really views himself as.

1:53:04.240 --> 1:53:06.160
<v Speaker 1>A break right and uh, I mean like I think

1:53:06.160 --> 1:53:07.800
<v Speaker 1>he'd go back if they had like a thing. But

1:53:07.840 --> 1:53:10.880
<v Speaker 1>all right, Patriots Bucks Week one, they're both playing at

1:53:10.880 --> 1:53:13.400
<v Speaker 1>the same time. He gets invited to both he's coming back,

1:53:13.439 --> 1:53:15.479
<v Speaker 1>He's coming here. I would think, so well, that was

1:53:15.520 --> 1:53:17.160
<v Speaker 1>the thing. I was like, is that what he's gonna do?

1:53:17.400 --> 1:53:19.280
<v Speaker 2>I mean, you know that when he goes into the

1:53:19.560 --> 1:53:21.320
<v Speaker 2>Pro Football Hall of Fame, the Hall of Fame game

1:53:21.360 --> 1:53:24.240
<v Speaker 2>will be Patriots Bucks of course obviously, right yeah, and

1:53:24.240 --> 1:53:24.840
<v Speaker 2>that'll be fun.

1:53:25.000 --> 1:53:27.120
<v Speaker 1>Oh I I that, you know, I don't like usually

1:53:27.120 --> 1:53:28.800
<v Speaker 1>travel with the team, but like, I've never been in

1:53:28.800 --> 1:53:30.840
<v Speaker 1>the PROFILEB Hall of Fame. I want to go. I

1:53:30.880 --> 1:53:32.519
<v Speaker 1>can't think of when I was growing up. But you

1:53:32.520 --> 1:53:34.280
<v Speaker 1>say I'll go and Drew Bledsoe gets in. I'm starting

1:53:34.320 --> 1:53:35.680
<v Speaker 1>to think that's not gonna happen. So I'll go in

1:53:35.760 --> 1:53:38.640
<v Speaker 1>Tom Brady, I'm saying when I was like ten, I

1:53:38.720 --> 1:53:40.439
<v Speaker 1>used to say that that's great.

1:53:40.680 --> 1:53:45.840
<v Speaker 2>Uh yeah, so it was great. I thought the him

1:53:45.880 --> 1:53:48.519
<v Speaker 2>coming out on the lighthouse first and like that sort

1:53:48.560 --> 1:53:52.439
<v Speaker 2>of being reveal was cool. Uh the rundown was cool,

1:53:52.600 --> 1:53:54.640
<v Speaker 2>Like I you know, that's not usually my thing. You know,

1:53:54.680 --> 1:53:55.280
<v Speaker 2>I hate fun.

1:53:55.760 --> 1:53:58.040
<v Speaker 1>I thought, would he like zipping the jacket like that?

1:53:58.160 --> 1:54:01.040
<v Speaker 1>It was the old jersey? Yeah yeah, and that wasn't

1:54:01.080 --> 1:54:02.880
<v Speaker 1>just an old jersey, that was a game warn jersey.

1:54:02.960 --> 1:54:05.680
<v Speaker 2>Everything. That really the big the thing that got me

1:54:05.840 --> 1:54:08.120
<v Speaker 2>got me. Yeah, was just like seeing him in Patriots

1:54:08.160 --> 1:54:10.519
<v Speaker 2>gear again. Yeah, like that was like like you said,

1:54:10.600 --> 1:54:12.640
<v Speaker 2>like he could have worn a TV twelve stuff he

1:54:12.720 --> 1:54:14.840
<v Speaker 2>couldn't like, but he was wearing the Elvis.

1:54:14.880 --> 1:54:17.559
<v Speaker 1>He was in Patriots gear. Uh, he was a Patriots

1:54:18.080 --> 1:54:20.479
<v Speaker 1>but it wasn't. But it's even deeper than that. It

1:54:20.520 --> 1:54:22.320
<v Speaker 1>wasn't like they went and got a jersey from the

1:54:22.320 --> 1:54:23.880
<v Speaker 1>pro Shop and it was like the new dream. No

1:54:24.120 --> 1:54:25.599
<v Speaker 1>that and I'll take you you look at the way

1:54:25.640 --> 1:54:28.920
<v Speaker 1>the jersey's cutting. Yeah, that was a game warn jersey.

1:54:29.120 --> 1:54:31.439
<v Speaker 2>Well it was great. All of it was great, and

1:54:31.520 --> 1:54:34.640
<v Speaker 2>I'm glad it happened. And I'm really looking forward to

1:54:34.880 --> 1:54:37.960
<v Speaker 2>uh six twelve twenty four, Alex and I I'm sure

1:54:38.000 --> 1:54:41.040
<v Speaker 2>we'll be there. Oh yeah, and you might have to

1:54:41.040 --> 1:54:43.440
<v Speaker 2>bring the tissues. You might have to. I got a

1:54:43.480 --> 1:54:46.280
<v Speaker 2>little emotional, right, I did bring the tissues. It's gonna

1:54:46.280 --> 1:54:47.120
<v Speaker 2>be a great time.

1:54:47.480 --> 1:54:47.640
<v Speaker 3>Uh.

1:54:47.680 --> 1:54:50.040
<v Speaker 2>That ticket is gonna be a hot ticket though. That's

1:54:50.080 --> 1:54:52.120
<v Speaker 2>gonna be a tough one to get, So don't don't

1:54:52.200 --> 1:54:55.040
<v Speaker 2>don't come side in the DMS asking for tickets.

1:54:54.680 --> 1:54:56.760
<v Speaker 1>That Zach Bryan back to back like two weeks.

1:54:56.840 --> 1:54:59.240
<v Speaker 2>Oh my god, Yeah, everybody's gonna be at Zach Bryan.

1:54:59.280 --> 1:55:01.840
<v Speaker 2>That's for sure, all right. Anyways, that does it here?

1:55:02.160 --> 1:55:05.560
<v Speaker 2>That was a full two hours, no commercials, no breaks,

1:55:05.680 --> 1:55:09.200
<v Speaker 2>no nothing, just two hours straight of Patriots talk. We

1:55:09.240 --> 1:55:11.920
<v Speaker 2>put morell to sleep. I love it. We'll be back

1:55:12.000 --> 1:55:16.400
<v Speaker 2>next week for another show here on Patriots Catch twenty two.

1:55:17.120 --> 1:55:20.680
<v Speaker 2>Watch us on YouTube, review us on Apple podcasts wherever

1:55:20.680 --> 1:55:22.320
<v Speaker 2>you get your pods. Thanks for listening. To see you

1:55:22.360 --> 1:55:22.800
<v Speaker 2>next week.

1:55:24.920 --> 1:55:26.680
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for downloading this podcast.

1:55:26.880 --> 1:55:30.200
<v Speaker 2>Subscribe on Apple, google Play, and everywhere else you listen.

1:55:30.560 --> 1:55:32.720
<v Speaker 2>Like the show, Please rate and review us.

1:55:32.920 --> 1:55:35.480
<v Speaker 4>Listener comments and ratings help keep us high on the

1:55:35.480 --> 1:55:38.240
<v Speaker 4>podcast rankings so new listeners can find us.

1:55:38.400 --> 1:55:41.360
<v Speaker 1>Be sure to check Patriots dot com for more news

1:55:41.520 --> 1:55:47.960
<v Speaker 1>and more podcasts.