1
00:00:02,720 --> 00:00:16,040
Speaker 1: Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, Radio News.

2
00:00:19,000 --> 00:00:22,400
Speaker 2: Hello and welcome to another episode of the Odd Lots Podcast.

3
00:00:22,440 --> 00:00:24,760
Speaker 3: I'm Joe Wisenthal and I'm Tracy Alloway.

4
00:00:24,920 --> 00:00:27,000
Speaker 2: Tracy, we're here in Jackson Hole.

5
00:00:27,240 --> 00:00:28,280
Speaker 3: It's nice to be back.

6
00:00:28,480 --> 00:00:30,600
Speaker 2: It's really nice to be back. So this is the

7
00:00:30,680 --> 00:00:34,480
Speaker 2: second year we've come to the Big Kansas City FED

8
00:00:34,640 --> 00:00:38,960
Speaker 2: Economic Policy Symposium, and I think it's fair to say,

9
00:00:39,360 --> 00:00:41,760
Speaker 2: you know, we heard Powell this morning, there's a certain

10
00:00:41,920 --> 00:00:43,800
Speaker 2: era of like victory.

11
00:00:43,479 --> 00:00:47,440
Speaker 3: Right, Yeah, the vibe has shifted. I think last year

12
00:00:47,840 --> 00:00:50,839
Speaker 3: there was a little bit more I guess comfort with

13
00:00:50,920 --> 00:00:54,000
Speaker 3: the idea of inflation coming down, at least compared to

14
00:00:54,640 --> 00:00:57,640
Speaker 3: the year before. So remember two years ago was the

15
00:00:57,680 --> 00:01:00,600
Speaker 3: famous Powell speech here in Jackson Hole where he stood

16
00:01:00,640 --> 00:01:02,960
Speaker 3: up and he basically said there's no way we're going

17
00:01:03,000 --> 00:01:06,240
Speaker 3: to get inflation down without a degree of economic pain,

18
00:01:06,400 --> 00:01:09,920
Speaker 3: i e. A pickup in the unemployment rate, job losses,

19
00:01:10,000 --> 00:01:13,120
Speaker 3: that sort of thing. And now fast forward two years

20
00:01:13,840 --> 00:01:17,160
Speaker 3: and he basically announced that it's time for rate cuts.

21
00:01:17,319 --> 00:01:20,680
Speaker 3: And it wasn't a victory lap necessarily, but he sort

22
00:01:20,720 --> 00:01:24,039
Speaker 3: of walked through how and why he thinks inflation has

23
00:01:24,080 --> 00:01:26,440
Speaker 3: come down without those job losses.

24
00:01:26,680 --> 00:01:29,240
Speaker 2: That's right, and of course we've seen that tick up

25
00:01:29,280 --> 00:01:32,679
Speaker 2: in the unemployment rate, not through big layoffs however, so

26
00:01:32,720 --> 00:01:36,000
Speaker 2: there's not been a major degree of cuts. But the

27
00:01:36,040 --> 00:01:38,800
Speaker 2: other aspect of that is, like, you know, there was

28
00:01:38,840 --> 00:01:42,959
Speaker 2: some expectation that to balance the economy achieve the inflation mandate,

29
00:01:42,959 --> 00:01:45,080
Speaker 2: there would have to be some loosening of the labor market.

30
00:01:45,400 --> 00:01:46,920
Speaker 2: But what he said, and I think it was the

31
00:01:46,920 --> 00:01:49,240
Speaker 2: second line of the whole speech, is we don't want

32
00:01:49,280 --> 00:01:52,200
Speaker 2: to see anymore we're good ones at this point. The

33
00:01:52,320 --> 00:01:55,600
Speaker 2: risks to the labor market are what we're primarily concerned with,

34
00:01:55,920 --> 00:01:58,280
Speaker 2: and we do not need to see any more weakness

35
00:01:58,280 --> 00:02:01,520
Speaker 2: to be confident that inflation is no longer a major risk.

36
00:02:01,640 --> 00:02:05,600
Speaker 3: Yeah, so the focus has certainly shifted from upside inflation

37
00:02:05,800 --> 00:02:10,240
Speaker 3: risk to downside labor market risk. But this opens up

38
00:02:10,360 --> 00:02:13,400
Speaker 3: a whole new set of issues and things that we

39
00:02:13,520 --> 00:02:16,519
Speaker 3: need to discuss, and I guess everyone's going to be

40
00:02:16,520 --> 00:02:20,919
Speaker 3: focused on a slightly different set of economic indicators going forward.

41
00:02:21,120 --> 00:02:23,920
Speaker 2: Right, So now the question is like, okay, if you

42
00:02:24,080 --> 00:02:27,160
Speaker 2: accept that the primary risk for the FED and Paul

43
00:02:27,280 --> 00:02:30,280
Speaker 2: s edit, so it is is now protecting against further

44
00:02:30,320 --> 00:02:32,640
Speaker 2: weakness in the labor market. What does that look like?

45
00:02:32,720 --> 00:02:35,720
Speaker 2: Because yes, we know now basically for certain data rate

46
00:02:35,760 --> 00:02:38,440
Speaker 2: cut is coming in September, but there are still all

47
00:02:38,600 --> 00:02:40,440
Speaker 2: types of questions about the size of the cut, how

48
00:02:40,440 --> 00:02:43,560
Speaker 2: many cuts, the sequencing, et cetera. And from a market

49
00:02:43,600 --> 00:02:47,320
Speaker 2: perspective in particular, I would say this is actually still

50
00:02:47,320 --> 00:02:48,560
Speaker 2: a very live and open question.

51
00:02:48,680 --> 00:02:51,200
Speaker 3: No, absolutely, and the other thing that's happening, and we

52
00:02:51,200 --> 00:02:53,760
Speaker 3: should get into this. But the FED has said so

53
00:02:53,960 --> 00:02:57,440
Speaker 3: many times that it's data dependent now, and so if

54
00:02:57,440 --> 00:03:00,080
Speaker 3: you say you're data dependent and you're really focused on

55
00:03:00,120 --> 00:03:03,280
Speaker 3: what's going on in the labor market, then that's like

56
00:03:03,360 --> 00:03:06,880
Speaker 3: a combination for everyone to be watching that next jobs

57
00:03:06,919 --> 00:03:09,320
Speaker 3: report as an indicator of whether or not we get

58
00:03:09,320 --> 00:03:11,400
Speaker 3: twenty five or fifty BIPs, or if it comes in

59
00:03:11,480 --> 00:03:13,359
Speaker 3: better than expected, maybe you don't get a rate cut

60
00:03:13,360 --> 00:03:14,080
Speaker 3: at all. I don't know.

61
00:03:14,800 --> 00:03:16,640
Speaker 2: I guess nothing is locked in stone.

62
00:03:16,800 --> 00:03:17,880
Speaker 3: Everything is possible.

63
00:03:17,960 --> 00:03:20,960
Speaker 2: Anyway, I'm very excited. We have the perfect guest today,

64
00:03:21,000 --> 00:03:23,639
Speaker 2: someone that we have had on odd lots several years

65
00:03:23,639 --> 00:03:27,400
Speaker 2: ago talking about similar stuff, including I think it was

66
00:03:27,440 --> 00:03:30,119
Speaker 2: a discussion about how you even ascertained the neutral rate

67
00:03:30,160 --> 00:03:32,960
Speaker 2: of interest. But we're going to be talking about the

68
00:03:33,080 --> 00:03:36,600
Speaker 2: question of what will this rate cut cycle look like

69
00:03:36,640 --> 00:03:39,760
Speaker 2: that we're all expecting. So we were speaking with Peter Williams.

70
00:03:39,800 --> 00:03:42,560
Speaker 2: He is the managing director of macro Research and Central

71
00:03:42,560 --> 00:03:46,440
Speaker 2: Bank Policy at twenty two V Research. Previously he had

72
00:03:46,480 --> 00:03:49,480
Speaker 2: been at the IMF, he was at Evercore. He lives

73
00:03:49,520 --> 00:03:53,280
Speaker 2: in Bozeman, Montana. He just sort of drove down here

74
00:03:53,400 --> 00:03:56,080
Speaker 2: to meet with us, do some fly fishing here in

75
00:03:56,200 --> 00:03:58,360
Speaker 2: Jackson Hole, and also meet with us. She was not

76
00:03:58,520 --> 00:04:00,000
Speaker 2: in the room, but Tracy and I weren in the

77
00:04:00,120 --> 00:04:02,400
Speaker 2: room either. So we're all reading this speech. So Peter,

78
00:04:02,520 --> 00:04:04,560
Speaker 2: thank you so much for coming on out locked. It's

79
00:04:04,640 --> 00:04:06,240
Speaker 2: nice to meet you here. It's nice to see you here.

80
00:04:06,360 --> 00:04:07,960
Speaker 4: Nice to meet you guys. Nice to be down and.

81
00:04:07,880 --> 00:04:10,200
Speaker 2: We an intermitted person right before it was the first.

82
00:04:10,000 --> 00:04:11,520
Speaker 4: Time we got We had to meet on a fishing

83
00:04:11,520 --> 00:04:11,960
Speaker 4: boat ramp.

84
00:04:12,000 --> 00:04:14,640
Speaker 2: Not so bad, Yeah, not too bad. So you've been

85
00:04:14,680 --> 00:04:19,559
Speaker 2: writing even prior to the speech this morning, talking about like, okay,

86
00:04:19,600 --> 00:04:24,120
Speaker 2: the rate cut cycle is clearly coming into view. How

87
00:04:24,120 --> 00:04:26,279
Speaker 2: do you begin to think about the question? You know,

88
00:04:26,360 --> 00:04:29,520
Speaker 2: twenty five fifty both seem kind of live at this point.

89
00:04:29,520 --> 00:04:31,680
Speaker 2: How do you start trying to ascertain like what this

90
00:04:31,720 --> 00:04:32,120
Speaker 2: looks like.

91
00:04:32,360 --> 00:04:34,040
Speaker 4: Yeah, so I think you know the starting point is,

92
00:04:34,200 --> 00:04:36,560
Speaker 4: you know, Powell says, obviously we're getting some cuts. They're

93
00:04:36,600 --> 00:04:39,040
Speaker 4: starting soon. I would say, while Tracy wants to keep

94
00:04:39,040 --> 00:04:43,159
Speaker 4: every possibility open, they're going to cut in September, and realistically,

95
00:04:43,400 --> 00:04:45,640
Speaker 4: in the vast majority of cases, they're also probably cutting

96
00:04:45,680 --> 00:04:48,360
Speaker 4: in November and December two. I think just penciling in

97
00:04:48,400 --> 00:04:50,200
Speaker 4: some degree of front loading, because when you're in a

98
00:04:50,360 --> 00:04:52,920
Speaker 4: risk management mode usually you move a little bit more

99
00:04:52,920 --> 00:04:54,920
Speaker 4: aggressively than when you're in just kind of minding the

100
00:04:54,960 --> 00:04:57,120
Speaker 4: base case. We were minding the base case in like

101
00:04:57,160 --> 00:05:01,080
Speaker 4: twenty seventeen, twenty eighteen, policy was slow gradual the last

102
00:05:01,120 --> 00:05:03,599
Speaker 4: three and a half years, right since COVID hit in

103
00:05:03,600 --> 00:05:06,680
Speaker 4: different ways, you've been minding the extreme tales in both directions,

104
00:05:07,080 --> 00:05:08,880
Speaker 4: and now we're starting to worry more about the downside.

105
00:05:08,920 --> 00:05:12,160
Speaker 4: So you know, maybe base case from listening to thegitality

106
00:05:12,160 --> 00:05:14,800
Speaker 4: of FED speak besides just Powell kind of still sounds

107
00:05:14,800 --> 00:05:17,400
Speaker 4: like a fit a twenty five, but especially if the

108
00:05:17,440 --> 00:05:19,680
Speaker 4: labor market data comes in a little bit softer than expected.

109
00:05:20,400 --> 00:05:22,880
Speaker 4: All eyes on this sort of August payroll print for sure,

110
00:05:22,920 --> 00:05:25,240
Speaker 4: but also the job was claims data as well, sort

111
00:05:25,240 --> 00:05:27,960
Speaker 4: of cumulating over time. Yeah, I think it's a fifty

112
00:05:28,360 --> 00:05:31,800
Speaker 4: certainly seems very possible and maybe even prudent. But I'm

113
00:05:31,800 --> 00:05:33,560
Speaker 4: also not the guy in the room making the decisions.

114
00:05:33,720 --> 00:05:36,799
Speaker 3: Well, just on that note, are there pros and cons

115
00:05:36,880 --> 00:05:40,279
Speaker 3: to twenty five BIPs versus fifty BIPs? So, for instance,

116
00:05:40,680 --> 00:05:43,800
Speaker 3: maybe you want to be early and proactive, so you

117
00:05:43,839 --> 00:05:47,000
Speaker 3: cut by fifty bases points. But on the other hand,

118
00:05:47,160 --> 00:05:49,919
Speaker 3: I might imagine that there would be some investors or

119
00:05:49,960 --> 00:05:52,640
Speaker 3: some people in the market who think, oh, the Fed's

120
00:05:52,720 --> 00:05:55,479
Speaker 3: really worried about the labor market and that's why they're

121
00:05:55,520 --> 00:05:59,040
Speaker 3: cutting so dramatically in September. It seems like there are

122
00:05:59,040 --> 00:06:01,800
Speaker 3: benefits and all so downsides for each of those moves.

123
00:06:02,120 --> 00:06:04,120
Speaker 4: Yeah, I think at this point, with Powis saying that

124
00:06:04,160 --> 00:06:07,000
Speaker 4: we're no longer really worried about inflation on the inflation

125
00:06:07,080 --> 00:06:10,800
Speaker 4: expectation side or labor market driven inflation, the case for

126
00:06:10,880 --> 00:06:13,239
Speaker 4: sort of not fifty to some extent, like not pretty

127
00:06:13,240 --> 00:06:16,159
Speaker 4: aggressively front loading, you know, largely boils down to sort

128
00:06:16,160 --> 00:06:19,440
Speaker 4: of institutional inertia. They tend to move relatively slowly unless

129
00:06:19,440 --> 00:06:21,600
Speaker 4: you're in the midst of a very deep financial crisis

130
00:06:21,680 --> 00:06:24,560
Speaker 4: or something like COVID. You know, these mid cycle adjustments,

131
00:06:24,600 --> 00:06:26,720
Speaker 4: at least hopefully that's what this is that we've had

132
00:06:26,760 --> 00:06:29,880
Speaker 4: before have tended to be relatively gradual and small in nature,

133
00:06:29,920 --> 00:06:32,000
Speaker 4: so like you don't often get these very large drops

134
00:06:32,000 --> 00:06:35,600
Speaker 4: and rates in relatively stable times. But against that is,

135
00:06:35,640 --> 00:06:37,920
Speaker 4: we know rates are very high, we know interest rate

136
00:06:38,000 --> 00:06:40,560
Speaker 4: sensitive parts of the economy have been struggling for a

137
00:06:40,640 --> 00:06:43,080
Speaker 4: year and a half or two years now, and so

138
00:06:43,200 --> 00:06:46,479
Speaker 4: the case sort of against fifty feels more of like

139
00:06:46,560 --> 00:06:49,359
Speaker 4: an institutional one and sort of a desire not to

140
00:06:49,360 --> 00:06:51,760
Speaker 4: spook market participants. But like we all kind of see

141
00:06:51,800 --> 00:06:53,160
Speaker 4: the same data. If it is a little bit of

142
00:06:53,160 --> 00:06:55,400
Speaker 4: private data we don't see, but we see the big data.

143
00:06:55,440 --> 00:06:57,240
Speaker 4: We all see the employment report, we all see claims,

144
00:06:57,279 --> 00:06:59,520
Speaker 4: we all see inflation. And if you're just looking at

145
00:06:59,520 --> 00:07:01,560
Speaker 4: that data, it's sort of harder to make a case

146
00:07:01,800 --> 00:07:04,520
Speaker 4: that you shouldn't just front load, you know, the initial

147
00:07:04,520 --> 00:07:06,560
Speaker 4: part of the rate cutting cycle, and then from there

148
00:07:06,600 --> 00:07:08,120
Speaker 4: you can kind of move into like weight and see

149
00:07:08,120 --> 00:07:10,680
Speaker 4: mode or just pause, see what happens in twenty twenty five,

150
00:07:10,680 --> 00:07:13,480
Speaker 4: But at least early on payback, some of the hawkish

151
00:07:13,520 --> 00:07:15,640
Speaker 4: insurance they took out in late twenty two and over

152
00:07:15,680 --> 00:07:17,600
Speaker 4: the course of twenty twenty three, and you can be

153
00:07:17,640 --> 00:07:18,840
Speaker 4: a bit more level set.

154
00:07:19,040 --> 00:07:23,280
Speaker 2: You know, every cycle is different, But what do past

155
00:07:23,480 --> 00:07:26,760
Speaker 2: rate cut cycles generally say about the way the Fed

156
00:07:26,800 --> 00:07:29,840
Speaker 2: approaches it. I mean, it's different because the economy more

157
00:07:29,920 --> 00:07:32,640
Speaker 2: or less seems fine. There is not, certainly not a

158
00:07:32,680 --> 00:07:36,280
Speaker 2: consensus that we're in a recession currently. We're not in

159
00:07:36,320 --> 00:07:40,760
Speaker 2: a financial crisis currently. But what does history say about

160
00:07:40,760 --> 00:07:42,000
Speaker 2: how rate cut cycles work?

161
00:07:42,280 --> 00:07:44,480
Speaker 4: So you basically get two versions. There's a sort of

162
00:07:44,520 --> 00:07:48,600
Speaker 4: mid cycle correction which ninety five, ninety six, ninety seven,

163
00:07:48,640 --> 00:07:52,240
Speaker 4: ninety eight around LTCM and then arguably although people might

164
00:07:52,240 --> 00:07:55,520
Speaker 4: have different views, instead of twenty eighteen nineteen yeah as well,

165
00:07:55,520 --> 00:07:57,960
Speaker 4: and those tend to be relatively moderate in sort of

166
00:07:57,960 --> 00:08:01,040
Speaker 4: cumulative size, like seventy five maybe one hundred basis points.

167
00:08:01,520 --> 00:08:04,120
Speaker 4: And then on the other hand, you ever sessions, and

168
00:08:04,160 --> 00:08:06,200
Speaker 4: these are basically the two varieties of rate cutting cycles

169
00:08:06,200 --> 00:08:08,400
Speaker 4: we've had in the sort of modern, kind of post

170
00:08:08,480 --> 00:08:11,200
Speaker 4: vulgar era of FED central banking. And so I think

171
00:08:11,280 --> 00:08:14,400
Speaker 4: even now it feels a little bit different because compared

172
00:08:14,440 --> 00:08:16,760
Speaker 4: to those prior periods. You know, the assumptions about where

173
00:08:16,800 --> 00:08:19,320
Speaker 4: interest rate should be in the long run, especially from

174
00:08:19,320 --> 00:08:21,560
Speaker 4: the Fed's perspective. I think market participants probably thin they're

175
00:08:21,560 --> 00:08:23,400
Speaker 4: a little bit higher, but from most people the Fed,

176
00:08:23,440 --> 00:08:26,160
Speaker 4: you know, the comedian still says two eight, and we're

177
00:08:26,160 --> 00:08:28,280
Speaker 4: sort of looking at a pretty large gap to that

178
00:08:28,320 --> 00:08:30,840
Speaker 4: compared to a lot of those other prior mid cycle corrections.

179
00:08:31,000 --> 00:08:33,160
Speaker 4: So you're, you know, you're seeing a somewhat different sort

180
00:08:33,160 --> 00:08:35,400
Speaker 4: of base rate on how far you might normally expect

181
00:08:35,400 --> 00:08:37,439
Speaker 4: to cut. So the sample size of history is in

182
00:08:37,480 --> 00:08:38,960
Speaker 4: a somewhat structurally different world.

183
00:08:39,200 --> 00:08:43,160
Speaker 3: Yes, So the other thing I've been sort of thinking about,

184
00:08:43,400 --> 00:08:45,960
Speaker 3: and it's kind of remarkable about the current cycle, But

185
00:08:46,840 --> 00:08:48,880
Speaker 3: you know, just a week or so ago, I think

186
00:08:48,920 --> 00:08:52,400
Speaker 3: on August thirteenth, Bostic for instance, was talking about how

187
00:08:52,400 --> 00:08:54,600
Speaker 3: the FED needs to see a little bit more data

188
00:08:54,880 --> 00:08:57,719
Speaker 3: before it decides on rate cuts. And then fast forward.

189
00:08:57,400 --> 00:09:01,120
Speaker 2: To literally ten days later, yeah.

190
00:09:00,600 --> 00:09:02,800
Speaker 3: Exactly, he was talking about the potential for a fifty

191
00:09:02,840 --> 00:09:07,040
Speaker 3: basis point cut. And then today at Jackson Hole we

192
00:09:07,080 --> 00:09:10,040
Speaker 3: see Pow come out with an extremely ubbish speech where

193
00:09:10,080 --> 00:09:12,120
Speaker 3: he puts the emphasis on the labor market and says

194
00:09:12,120 --> 00:09:15,600
Speaker 3: we don't want to see further weakening. What happened in

195
00:09:15,640 --> 00:09:18,920
Speaker 3: this sort of like two week period, Well, I.

196
00:09:18,920 --> 00:09:19,880
Speaker 4: Think part of it is for a lot of the

197
00:09:19,920 --> 00:09:23,679
Speaker 4: more hawkish committee members, you've seen better inflation data. You know,

198
00:09:23,880 --> 00:09:26,760
Speaker 4: the Q one shock looks a little bit farther in

199
00:09:26,760 --> 00:09:28,920
Speaker 4: the rear of your mirror. Now you have relatively more confidence.

200
00:09:29,679 --> 00:09:32,160
Speaker 4: And while we haven't gotten that much more marginal labor

201
00:09:32,160 --> 00:09:35,080
Speaker 4: market data, none of it looks dramatically better, Like jobless

202
00:09:35,080 --> 00:09:37,120
Speaker 4: claims have been pretty well behaved. The last couple of weeks,

203
00:09:37,360 --> 00:09:39,600
Speaker 4: maybe had these very large downside revisions to sort of

204
00:09:39,600 --> 00:09:43,160
Speaker 4: trend NFP growth from April twenty three to sort of

205
00:09:43,160 --> 00:09:45,760
Speaker 4: March of twenty twenty four, and it just makes the

206
00:09:45,800 --> 00:09:47,640
Speaker 4: economy look a little bit more like it's been enough

207
00:09:47,679 --> 00:09:50,320
Speaker 4: funk for longer. And so that probably helps you reassess,

208
00:09:50,400 --> 00:09:51,880
Speaker 4: like what your view on the medium tournament is, and

209
00:09:51,880 --> 00:09:53,880
Speaker 4: if you're a little bit less optimistic about the steady

210
00:09:53,880 --> 00:09:55,920
Speaker 4: state of where the thing should be headed, maybe you

211
00:09:55,920 --> 00:09:57,600
Speaker 4: should be a little bit more proactive and trying to

212
00:09:57,840 --> 00:09:59,520
Speaker 4: cut off some downside risks there because you've a bit

213
00:09:59,559 --> 00:10:00,839
Speaker 4: less buffer in that sort of a world.

214
00:10:01,280 --> 00:10:04,440
Speaker 2: Does the first move tell us something about what the

215
00:10:04,480 --> 00:10:05,280
Speaker 2: second move will be.

216
00:10:06,280 --> 00:10:09,200
Speaker 4: Yes, more so if it's a fifty, I think because

217
00:10:09,240 --> 00:10:12,320
Speaker 4: either if you'd to fifty, I would say realistically, either

218
00:10:12,360 --> 00:10:15,520
Speaker 4: the August employment report was pretty bad, so the direction

219
00:10:15,559 --> 00:10:17,760
Speaker 4: of the economy walks worse. If you're still trying to

220
00:10:17,760 --> 00:10:20,080
Speaker 4: head off something really bad from happening, you'll be more

221
00:10:20,120 --> 00:10:23,559
Speaker 4: aggressive with it. Or if the August employment report was

222
00:10:23,600 --> 00:10:25,280
Speaker 4: fine and they still go fifty, then that tells you

223
00:10:25,320 --> 00:10:27,400
Speaker 4: something about the reaction function and their desire just to

224
00:10:27,440 --> 00:10:31,199
Speaker 4: be a little bit more proactively cautious in trying to

225
00:10:31,200 --> 00:10:33,160
Speaker 4: get rates down. So I think there if you see

226
00:10:33,160 --> 00:10:36,320
Speaker 4: a fifty in September, realistically you should expect that, like

227
00:10:36,360 --> 00:10:39,000
Speaker 4: the reaction function at least through early twenty five is

228
00:10:39,040 --> 00:10:41,839
Speaker 4: going to be relatively more duffish than otherwise, whether that's

229
00:10:41,840 --> 00:10:43,920
Speaker 4: pusis the data itself, or just the way they're seeing

230
00:10:43,960 --> 00:10:44,280
Speaker 4: the world.

231
00:10:44,600 --> 00:10:46,800
Speaker 3: The other thing I've been thinking about the last time,

232
00:10:46,920 --> 00:10:48,640
Speaker 3: or the first time we had you on all Blots,

233
00:10:48,800 --> 00:10:52,000
Speaker 3: it was to talk about our star or the neutral rate,

234
00:10:52,679 --> 00:10:56,160
Speaker 3: and since then, certainly this year, our star has kind

235
00:10:56,200 --> 00:10:58,600
Speaker 3: of fallen out of favor. So I think the Bank

236
00:10:58,640 --> 00:11:01,440
Speaker 3: for International Settlements came out and they were talking about

237
00:11:01,800 --> 00:11:06,280
Speaker 3: it's better to base policy on observable inputs, like the

238
00:11:06,320 --> 00:11:11,599
Speaker 3: actual data, rather than unobservable models. And I'm trying to

239
00:11:11,600 --> 00:11:14,280
Speaker 3: figure out, like there's so much talk about data dependency.

240
00:11:14,720 --> 00:11:17,000
Speaker 3: Our star is kind of out of fashion, but is

241
00:11:17,040 --> 00:11:20,000
Speaker 3: it still alive and well and sort of in the

242
00:11:20,040 --> 00:11:23,120
Speaker 3: background of Jackson Hole And we're just not talking about

243
00:11:23,160 --> 00:11:25,319
Speaker 3: it because it's no longer fashionable.

244
00:11:26,000 --> 00:11:28,840
Speaker 4: It's certainly not the operative concern for policy, right, Like,

245
00:11:29,400 --> 00:11:31,680
Speaker 4: you know, if the primary motivating force at this point

246
00:11:31,760 --> 00:11:33,040
Speaker 4: is like we don't want to see the labor market

247
00:11:33,080 --> 00:11:35,559
Speaker 4: fall apart, powerful this stuff this morning, this is what's

248
00:11:35,640 --> 00:11:38,760
Speaker 4: driving it, And you know our star maybe helps you

249
00:11:38,760 --> 00:11:41,679
Speaker 4: inform like how restrictive your current policy stance is, but

250
00:11:42,320 --> 00:11:44,720
Speaker 4: on like a quarter by quarter or meeting by meeting basis,

251
00:11:45,080 --> 00:11:47,120
Speaker 4: you just know that rates are substantially higher than they

252
00:11:47,120 --> 00:11:49,880
Speaker 4: were a few years ago. Looking at rates in ceative

253
00:11:49,880 --> 00:11:51,640
Speaker 4: parts of the economy, you know they've growing up, been

254
00:11:51,640 --> 00:11:54,280
Speaker 4: doing great. Overall economic activity has done surprisingly the wall

255
00:11:54,280 --> 00:11:55,960
Speaker 4: over the last couple of years, and suggests that our

256
00:11:55,960 --> 00:11:58,120
Speaker 4: star has probably moved up some post COVID for sure.

257
00:11:58,760 --> 00:12:00,440
Speaker 4: But you don't really want to base Paul, you have

258
00:12:00,520 --> 00:12:03,160
Speaker 4: like a very uncertain structural variable and say like, oh,

259
00:12:03,200 --> 00:12:05,400
Speaker 4: we should only cut you know, fifty basis points because

260
00:12:05,400 --> 00:12:08,000
Speaker 4: we're going to do a much higher our star because

261
00:12:08,040 --> 00:12:10,199
Speaker 4: you can only solve those sort of longer run problems

262
00:12:10,280 --> 00:12:11,680
Speaker 4: a little bit in the future. But like if you

263
00:12:11,840 --> 00:12:15,960
Speaker 4: accidentally create a recession, that's a very persistent problem you

264
00:12:15,960 --> 00:12:17,680
Speaker 4: have to deal with four years after the fact. So

265
00:12:17,720 --> 00:12:20,160
Speaker 4: it's sort of like different horizons for risk management, siness,

266
00:12:20,200 --> 00:12:20,679
Speaker 4: the kind of.

267
00:12:36,800 --> 00:12:39,360
Speaker 2: So we know that the sort of our star is

268
00:12:39,400 --> 00:12:42,440
Speaker 2: this sort of in economics that you can't directly observe it,

269
00:12:42,520 --> 00:12:45,280
Speaker 2: but we believe theoretically exists that there is some rate

270
00:12:45,320 --> 00:12:49,120
Speaker 2: that brings the economy into balance. What is the sort

271
00:12:49,160 --> 00:12:52,599
Speaker 2: of economic explanation for why that changes over time? And

272
00:12:53,000 --> 00:12:55,560
Speaker 2: just to add on to that, like why in twenty

273
00:12:55,600 --> 00:12:58,360
Speaker 2: twenty four do economists believe it's higher than say it

274
00:12:58,400 --> 00:12:59,280
Speaker 2: was in twenty eighteen.

275
00:13:00,000 --> 00:13:01,480
Speaker 4: Out of that, I think in the sort of post

276
00:13:01,520 --> 00:13:04,880
Speaker 4: GFC decade, you had, you know, a banking system that

277
00:13:04,920 --> 00:13:07,600
Speaker 4: was having to sort of you know, re solidify its

278
00:13:07,600 --> 00:13:09,480
Speaker 4: balance sheets. There was a lot of new regulation about

279
00:13:09,480 --> 00:13:11,400
Speaker 4: the banks making them kind of de risk. You had

280
00:13:11,440 --> 00:13:14,640
Speaker 4: fiscal policy that after sort of the Obama Ryan deal

281
00:13:14,720 --> 00:13:16,880
Speaker 4: was in much more restrictive territory given where the sort

282
00:13:16,880 --> 00:13:20,280
Speaker 4: of business cycle was, and you had, you know, sentiment

283
00:13:20,360 --> 00:13:22,760
Speaker 4: generally speaking, like on a corporate perspective, was just quite

284
00:13:22,760 --> 00:13:25,079
Speaker 4: subdued for a long time. Afterwards, you'd had this massive shock,

285
00:13:25,160 --> 00:13:26,960
Speaker 4: and I think a lot of these very persistent but

286
00:13:27,000 --> 00:13:30,040
Speaker 4: not necessarily permanent forces were dragging it down. You used

287
00:13:30,040 --> 00:13:32,600
Speaker 4: to have like longer run forces like productivity and demographics

288
00:13:32,640 --> 00:13:34,600
Speaker 4: that are sort of weighing on our star. But all

289
00:13:34,640 --> 00:13:37,520
Speaker 4: of this sort of persistent but not permanent stuff has

290
00:13:37,559 --> 00:13:39,640
Speaker 4: now sort of faded out, especially because the post COVID

291
00:13:39,679 --> 00:13:42,000
Speaker 4: experience was the exact opposite of all those things. It

292
00:13:42,000 --> 00:13:44,760
Speaker 4: was massive, fiscal policy was very loose. Financial conditions, it

293
00:13:44,800 --> 00:13:48,000
Speaker 4: was an absence of spending restraint on the part of

294
00:13:48,000 --> 00:13:49,600
Speaker 4: households and the government were large.

295
00:13:49,800 --> 00:13:54,200
Speaker 3: So the other noteworthy change between this year's Jackson Hole

296
00:13:54,360 --> 00:13:58,360
Speaker 3: and last year is last year, even though the trajectory

297
00:13:58,480 --> 00:14:01,720
Speaker 3: or the momentum overall on inflation was good, it was

298
00:14:01,800 --> 00:14:04,520
Speaker 3: coming down. There was a lot of talk about the

299
00:14:04,600 --> 00:14:07,400
Speaker 3: idea that, well, there's always the possibility that it comes

300
00:14:07,440 --> 00:14:10,760
Speaker 3: rearing back, and this could be the nineteen seventies all

301
00:14:10,800 --> 00:14:13,160
Speaker 3: over again where it comes down dramatically and then it

302
00:14:13,240 --> 00:14:17,440
Speaker 3: spikes a little bit later on. This year, it feels

303
00:14:17,480 --> 00:14:20,320
Speaker 3: like there's not much talk about that. There isn't even

304
00:14:20,320 --> 00:14:24,000
Speaker 3: that much talk about inflation expectations being embedded, like all

305
00:14:24,040 --> 00:14:26,520
Speaker 3: of that seems to have gone in the rear view

306
00:14:26,800 --> 00:14:30,280
Speaker 3: mirror and it's all about the labor market. Do you

307
00:14:30,320 --> 00:14:34,560
Speaker 3: think consideration of the return of inflation is warranted here?

308
00:14:34,640 --> 00:14:37,600
Speaker 3: Should there be more discussion about the potential for inflation

309
00:14:37,720 --> 00:14:38,640
Speaker 3: to come back.

310
00:14:39,080 --> 00:14:41,480
Speaker 4: Over the medium term? I think, you know, post COVID

311
00:14:41,520 --> 00:14:43,680
Speaker 4: and especially you know during the contrast with the sort

312
00:14:43,680 --> 00:14:46,840
Speaker 4: of like post GFC era, you know, inflation, that trend

313
00:14:46,920 --> 00:14:49,720
Speaker 4: in inflation seems like it has moved somewhat higher. Trying

314
00:14:49,720 --> 00:14:51,440
Speaker 4: to pin it down seems like kind of a fraud endeavor,

315
00:14:51,480 --> 00:14:52,880
Speaker 4: but it certainly moved higher. There it was it was

316
00:14:52,920 --> 00:14:55,800
Speaker 4: sort of substantially too low after the GFC. Now it's

317
00:14:55,800 --> 00:14:58,200
Speaker 4: preps a little bit too high, but it's not so

318
00:14:58,280 --> 00:15:00,200
Speaker 4: high that it's obviously a problem for the FED, because

319
00:15:00,200 --> 00:15:02,160
Speaker 4: I don't think most people notice if core PCE is

320
00:15:02,360 --> 00:15:04,080
Speaker 4: two and are quarter percent or two percent or one

321
00:15:04,080 --> 00:15:06,280
Speaker 4: point nine. Realistically, as long as like the labor market

322
00:15:06,320 --> 00:15:08,680
Speaker 4: is okay, and that's sort of a world It like

323
00:15:08,720 --> 00:15:10,720
Speaker 4: adds a little bit of a bias towards policy over

324
00:15:10,720 --> 00:15:12,200
Speaker 4: the medium term. And they've definitely been you know, some

325
00:15:12,240 --> 00:15:16,680
Speaker 4: structural shifts post COVID that seems somewhat inflationary, but in general,

326
00:15:16,760 --> 00:15:18,480
Speaker 4: at the moment, it's not really the operative concern as

327
00:15:18,480 --> 00:15:20,040
Speaker 4: we had into like twenty five or twenty six. If

328
00:15:20,080 --> 00:15:22,560
Speaker 4: the economy really reheats, that could be a problem down

329
00:15:22,560 --> 00:15:24,680
Speaker 4: the road, but that's a problem for a very optimistic

330
00:15:25,360 --> 00:15:28,640
Speaker 4: view of the world two plus years from now, not today.

331
00:15:28,840 --> 00:15:31,880
Speaker 2: So in Q one of this year, we did get

332
00:15:32,240 --> 00:15:35,160
Speaker 2: warmer than expected data. You know, one point that we

333
00:15:35,160 --> 00:15:36,680
Speaker 2: was talking about there are a lot of people thought

334
00:15:36,680 --> 00:15:38,440
Speaker 2: the rate cutting cycle was going to start in March,

335
00:15:38,960 --> 00:15:41,240
Speaker 2: and then we got that warmer than expected data to

336
00:15:41,320 --> 00:15:45,360
Speaker 2: start the year, and then they had to push that back. So, okay,

337
00:15:46,000 --> 00:15:49,200
Speaker 2: what if we have like another period just to you know,

338
00:15:49,440 --> 00:15:52,240
Speaker 2: for whatever reason, some component or something, you know, let's

339
00:15:52,240 --> 00:15:55,000
Speaker 2: say Q four does run on the warm side, and

340
00:15:55,040 --> 00:15:58,200
Speaker 2: they feel, you know, there's some let's say, questions emerge

341
00:15:58,200 --> 00:16:01,160
Speaker 2: about whether they should continue the rate cut cycle in

342
00:16:01,200 --> 00:16:02,840
Speaker 2: the face of this data. You know, let's say the

343
00:16:02,880 --> 00:16:05,080
Speaker 2: job's coming strong and suddenly things look warmer in the

344
00:16:05,120 --> 00:16:08,880
Speaker 2: short term, not twenty twenty five, twenty twenty six. What

345
00:16:09,000 --> 00:16:12,600
Speaker 2: are the costs for the FED if the rate cut

346
00:16:12,680 --> 00:16:16,080
Speaker 2: cycle is you know, sort of aborted so to speak,

347
00:16:16,200 --> 00:16:18,120
Speaker 2: I mean, or if they feel, you know, it's like

348
00:16:18,120 --> 00:16:19,680
Speaker 2: you're like, you know what, actually, we don't want to

349
00:16:19,680 --> 00:16:21,680
Speaker 2: be cutting rates as fast for whatever because the data

350
00:16:21,760 --> 00:16:23,520
Speaker 2: does not come into way they expect.

351
00:16:23,400 --> 00:16:25,560
Speaker 4: Well, if you get surprised by the data, you should

352
00:16:25,560 --> 00:16:27,480
Speaker 4: respond to it. And I think fundamentally the issue that

353
00:16:27,480 --> 00:16:28,800
Speaker 4: I've had with a lot of some of the FED

354
00:16:28,800 --> 00:16:31,560
Speaker 4: speakers recently is that they're sort of premising this notion

355
00:16:31,600 --> 00:16:33,960
Speaker 4: on doing the appropriate thing now about something that eventually

356
00:16:33,960 --> 00:16:37,000
Speaker 4: down the future could maybe be a surprise. Yeah, and like,

357
00:16:37,040 --> 00:16:39,080
Speaker 4: you know, some part of policy needs to be consistent

358
00:16:39,120 --> 00:16:41,800
Speaker 4: over time, but you know a lot of shocks happen

359
00:16:41,840 --> 00:16:43,840
Speaker 4: in the economy. It's always evolving. And I think the

360
00:16:43,880 --> 00:16:46,440
Speaker 4: notion that like, you can't do something today for the

361
00:16:46,440 --> 00:16:48,520
Speaker 4: most predominant risk because you might get a little bit

362
00:16:48,520 --> 00:16:50,280
Speaker 4: of a surprise direction a year, for an hour, six

363
00:16:50,320 --> 00:16:50,760
Speaker 4: months from now.

364
00:16:50,960 --> 00:16:53,280
Speaker 2: People really do talk about this. They like there's like, oh,

365
00:16:53,360 --> 00:16:55,200
Speaker 2: the Oh, the worst thing that would happen is they

366
00:16:55,200 --> 00:16:58,720
Speaker 2: have to backtrack or something. And I'm trying to understand, like, okay,

367
00:16:58,720 --> 00:17:01,200
Speaker 2: if that's so bad, what exacts is so bad about it?

368
00:17:01,240 --> 00:17:03,280
Speaker 4: I think there's a fear that by changing your mind,

369
00:17:03,360 --> 00:17:06,439
Speaker 4: maybe you you know, elevate risk premium, you make markets

370
00:17:06,440 --> 00:17:07,439
Speaker 4: a little bit less certain.

371
00:17:08,040 --> 00:17:11,000
Speaker 3: But I mean we did just see massive drama in

372
00:17:11,080 --> 00:17:15,320
Speaker 3: the market. Yeah, because of like a reconsideration what the

373
00:17:15,359 --> 00:17:16,119
Speaker 3: FED was doing.

374
00:17:16,800 --> 00:17:19,639
Speaker 4: Yeah. True, It's just I think, you know, the worst

375
00:17:19,800 --> 00:17:22,240
Speaker 4: thing rather than not respond, you know, if you're worried

376
00:17:22,240 --> 00:17:23,639
Speaker 4: that like you might have to change your mind, but

377
00:17:23,640 --> 00:17:26,920
Speaker 4: it's much worse to not respond, I think, you know, fundamentally,

378
00:17:26,920 --> 00:17:29,080
Speaker 4: Like yes, maybe it shifts you in a little bit

379
00:17:29,200 --> 00:17:30,600
Speaker 4: on the margin of like well we should do a

380
00:17:30,640 --> 00:17:33,240
Speaker 4: little bit less because of the medium the inflation story

381
00:17:33,359 --> 00:17:36,800
Speaker 4: or something. But the softening in the labor market, you see,

382
00:17:36,800 --> 00:17:38,520
Speaker 4: power was very clear, Like that's in the data. You

383
00:17:38,560 --> 00:17:40,560
Speaker 4: can interpret it in different ways, but like the labor

384
00:17:40,600 --> 00:17:43,159
Speaker 4: market is back to normal, maybe even a little bit soft.

385
00:17:43,640 --> 00:17:45,520
Speaker 4: And if you're worried about that as the sort of

386
00:17:45,520 --> 00:17:48,760
Speaker 4: dominant kind of breaking things risk because you know, presumably

387
00:17:48,800 --> 00:17:52,120
Speaker 4: once recessions start, they get going pretty darn quick. That's

388
00:17:52,440 --> 00:17:54,960
Speaker 4: something you really have to sort of trunkate away pretty quickly, like, okay,

389
00:17:55,040 --> 00:17:57,240
Speaker 4: it didn't happen, Well, okay, that's fine. You can sort

390
00:17:57,240 --> 00:17:58,480
Speaker 4: of move on. It's like, you know, you buy a

391
00:17:58,520 --> 00:18:00,960
Speaker 4: bunch of insurance for your house and then like the

392
00:18:01,000 --> 00:18:03,320
Speaker 4: wildfire doesn't come. There are worse fates.

393
00:18:04,359 --> 00:18:06,680
Speaker 3: I mean, I still think it's a pretty big shift.

394
00:18:07,440 --> 00:18:10,640
Speaker 3: Post financial crisis, it was very much about forward guidance

395
00:18:10,680 --> 00:18:12,879
Speaker 3: and sort of trying to pin yields to where you

396
00:18:12,920 --> 00:18:15,960
Speaker 3: wanted them, and then I think it was twenty twenty

397
00:18:16,000 --> 00:18:20,480
Speaker 3: two it moved to the data dependency very very short term.

398
00:18:20,800 --> 00:18:23,919
Speaker 3: It does feel to me that there's a downside here

399
00:18:24,160 --> 00:18:27,160
Speaker 3: to saying that we're going to react to every data point,

400
00:18:27,359 --> 00:18:31,080
Speaker 3: especially when there's still big question marks over the quality

401
00:18:31,080 --> 00:18:33,600
Speaker 3: of the data. And we just had that BLS revision

402
00:18:33,600 --> 00:18:34,919
Speaker 3: that everyone was talking about.

403
00:18:35,600 --> 00:18:38,480
Speaker 4: So the way you sort of robustify against that is

404
00:18:38,520 --> 00:18:40,280
Speaker 4: you still have to have some sort of forward looking

405
00:18:40,440 --> 00:18:43,920
Speaker 4: view on a policy relevant horizon. Six or twelve months

406
00:18:43,920 --> 00:18:46,520
Speaker 4: out is typically when you thing like monetary policy can

407
00:18:46,600 --> 00:18:49,480
Speaker 4: really impact the sort of top line kind of macro data, right,

408
00:18:49,920 --> 00:18:52,240
Speaker 4: So you have that sort of view, but you're updating

409
00:18:52,240 --> 00:18:54,760
Speaker 4: it relatively robustly as the new data comes in. But

410
00:18:54,760 --> 00:18:56,520
Speaker 4: the problem, especially over the last year and a half,

411
00:18:56,640 --> 00:18:58,280
Speaker 4: is that different parts of the data have been telling

412
00:18:58,320 --> 00:19:00,639
Speaker 4: you relatively different things, so you sort of have to

413
00:19:00,680 --> 00:19:03,439
Speaker 4: average between them. And the more you get into like

414
00:19:03,800 --> 00:19:06,320
Speaker 4: a sort of risk management driven mode, maybe you'll pay

415
00:19:06,320 --> 00:19:08,480
Speaker 4: a bit more attention to the most pessimistic parts of

416
00:19:08,480 --> 00:19:11,760
Speaker 4: the data right now, the unemployment rate perhaps, or you know,

417
00:19:11,800 --> 00:19:14,080
Speaker 4: if everything else holds up, well, you might shift the

418
00:19:14,080 --> 00:19:16,600
Speaker 4: signals you're paying attention to. If that theory you had

419
00:19:16,640 --> 00:19:19,159
Speaker 4: about the unemployment rates sort of spiraling doesn't come to pass,

420
00:19:19,480 --> 00:19:21,000
Speaker 4: then you'll pay me put one more weight on the

421
00:19:21,000 --> 00:19:23,520
Speaker 4: activity data or the NFP data. Despite the revisions that

422
00:19:23,640 --> 00:19:25,760
Speaker 4: just had still looks okay, if not fantastic.

423
00:19:26,280 --> 00:19:28,399
Speaker 2: What do you think about like the efficacy of cuts,

424
00:19:28,440 --> 00:19:30,600
Speaker 2: because okay, for a while, there was questions about, well,

425
00:19:30,600 --> 00:19:33,440
Speaker 2: what are the efficacy of rate hikes because they didn't

426
00:19:33,440 --> 00:19:34,879
Speaker 2: seem to be doing much for a while, and they

427
00:19:34,880 --> 00:19:39,040
Speaker 2: certainly didn't impact the labor market as people had anticipated,

428
00:19:39,160 --> 00:19:43,960
Speaker 2: and various stories everyone has their mortgages locked in or yes,

429
00:19:44,000 --> 00:19:46,720
Speaker 2: it affected the economy, but only in like real estate

430
00:19:46,760 --> 00:19:48,520
Speaker 2: and like auto loans or you know, much of the

431
00:19:48,520 --> 00:19:51,400
Speaker 2: economy is not rate sensitive and how long are the lags,

432
00:19:51,480 --> 00:19:53,960
Speaker 2: et cetera. So it feels like, to some extent, we

433
00:19:54,040 --> 00:19:56,480
Speaker 2: need to have that version again for the cutting cycle

434
00:19:56,480 --> 00:19:59,919
Speaker 2: and what we expected to do. So from your perspective,

435
00:20:00,119 --> 00:20:02,160
Speaker 2: like let's just say the FED goes fifty or twenty

436
00:20:02,200 --> 00:20:05,840
Speaker 2: five or whatever. In your view, how does that transmit

437
00:20:05,960 --> 00:20:08,679
Speaker 2: to putting that floor under activity and how quickly?

438
00:20:09,200 --> 00:20:10,920
Speaker 4: Yeah, I mean, some of it is just ratifying what's

439
00:20:10,960 --> 00:20:13,200
Speaker 4: already priced in markets. You know, they have pretty strong

440
00:20:13,200 --> 00:20:14,920
Speaker 4: assumptions about cuts over the next year and a half

441
00:20:15,040 --> 00:20:16,800
Speaker 4: or so, So to some extent, you still have to

442
00:20:16,800 --> 00:20:18,640
Speaker 4: do the thing that's priced in, even though like yep,

443
00:20:18,760 --> 00:20:20,640
Speaker 4: you know, long term rates to people borrow it may

444
00:20:20,640 --> 00:20:22,320
Speaker 4: not change that much. But I think a lot of

445
00:20:22,320 --> 00:20:24,520
Speaker 4: it also has to do with a sentiment shift on

446
00:20:24,560 --> 00:20:26,880
Speaker 4: the part of what call them like wes, financially sensitive

447
00:20:26,920 --> 00:20:30,160
Speaker 4: firms and households. We're just seeing headlines about FED rate

448
00:20:30,200 --> 00:20:32,639
Speaker 4: cuts sort of changes the tenor of your business and

449
00:20:32,680 --> 00:20:34,480
Speaker 4: maybe changes some decision making because this comes through in

450
00:20:34,520 --> 00:20:35,960
Speaker 4: a lot of surveys. You know, to an extent that

451
00:20:36,000 --> 00:20:38,240
Speaker 4: often kind of surprises you when you're reading them, but

452
00:20:38,240 --> 00:20:40,840
Speaker 4: there's a pretty large amount of attention paid to just

453
00:20:40,880 --> 00:20:42,760
Speaker 4: the headlines. Yeah. The headline is the Fed's going to

454
00:20:42,800 --> 00:20:44,119
Speaker 4: get your back starting in September.

455
00:20:44,400 --> 00:20:47,480
Speaker 2: Yeah, Tracy. Speaking of the surveys, there were a lot

456
00:20:47,520 --> 00:20:50,439
Speaker 2: of specific comments the last couple of months, I think,

457
00:20:50,800 --> 00:20:54,280
Speaker 2: in like the Dallas FED Manufacturing survey of business owners

458
00:20:54,720 --> 00:20:58,359
Speaker 2: specifically saying like rate cuts please, or we expect things

459
00:20:58,400 --> 00:21:01,280
Speaker 2: to be good assuming they're rate cuts. So people are

460
00:21:01,280 --> 00:21:01,920
Speaker 2: paying attention.

461
00:21:02,320 --> 00:21:04,880
Speaker 3: Yeah, although they were kind of saying the same thing

462
00:21:05,040 --> 00:21:06,800
Speaker 3: a year ago as we I mean, we were talking

463
00:21:06,840 --> 00:21:08,879
Speaker 3: about the VIBE session and some of the stuff you

464
00:21:09,000 --> 00:21:12,880
Speaker 3: read was like, it's an absolute disaster the FED cut.

465
00:21:12,960 --> 00:21:16,960
Speaker 3: Right now, Peter, what's the most interesting thing that you're

466
00:21:17,000 --> 00:21:19,800
Speaker 3: watching now when it comes to the Fed and monetary policy?

467
00:21:19,840 --> 00:21:22,879
Speaker 3: We've had the shift that some people were expecting, the

468
00:21:22,920 --> 00:21:26,520
Speaker 3: emphasis moving from inflation to the labor market. What should

469
00:21:26,560 --> 00:21:28,080
Speaker 3: we be on the lookout for now?

470
00:21:28,320 --> 00:21:30,000
Speaker 4: I hang in the short run, it's sort of rate

471
00:21:30,080 --> 00:21:32,680
Speaker 4: sensitive spending because if you're perhaps a little bit worried

472
00:21:32,680 --> 00:21:34,399
Speaker 4: about the labor market and how activity data is going

473
00:21:34,400 --> 00:21:36,119
Speaker 4: to shake up with rates having been so high for

474
00:21:36,119 --> 00:21:38,439
Speaker 4: so long and like maybe things just tip over on there.

475
00:21:38,440 --> 00:21:40,760
Speaker 4: In accord, you need to see that sort of rate

476
00:21:40,800 --> 00:21:43,000
Speaker 4: sensitive spending in the economy start to kind of recover

477
00:21:43,040 --> 00:21:45,080
Speaker 4: and rebound there. You know, the housing data has been

478
00:21:45,720 --> 00:21:48,600
Speaker 4: relatively soft so far to start the summer since market

479
00:21:48,640 --> 00:21:50,760
Speaker 4: rates started coming down, but as you sort of get

480
00:21:50,800 --> 00:21:52,760
Speaker 4: through into like later this year and into early next year,

481
00:21:52,800 --> 00:21:55,000
Speaker 4: you really need to see that rate sensitive spending part

482
00:21:55,000 --> 00:21:57,119
Speaker 4: of the economy start to rebound because if that doesn't happen,

483
00:21:57,480 --> 00:21:59,960
Speaker 4: to Joe's point a bit ago, the efficacy of police

484
00:22:00,160 --> 00:22:01,960
Speaker 4: on the downside, in addition to the upside, becomes a

485
00:22:01,960 --> 00:22:04,119
Speaker 4: bit more of a concern, and you worry that the

486
00:22:04,240 --> 00:22:06,000
Speaker 4: Fed might not have the economies back in the way

487
00:22:06,000 --> 00:22:07,080
Speaker 4: we all kind of assume right now.

488
00:22:07,359 --> 00:22:10,960
Speaker 2: Peter, so great to meet you in person and run

489
00:22:11,000 --> 00:22:14,199
Speaker 2: into each other here. And Jackson Hall, so thank you

490
00:22:14,200 --> 00:22:15,640
Speaker 2: so much for coming back on outlaws.

491
00:22:15,680 --> 00:22:16,160
Speaker 4: Thanks so much.

492
00:22:16,200 --> 00:22:30,600
Speaker 5: Great to be back again, Tracy.

493
00:22:30,760 --> 00:22:33,920
Speaker 2: I thought that was very helpful. You know, they're obviously

494
00:22:34,160 --> 00:22:37,160
Speaker 2: going to be a number of questions here, but one

495
00:22:37,240 --> 00:22:39,879
Speaker 2: thing that is in particular I thought was interesting was

496
00:22:40,240 --> 00:22:43,399
Speaker 2: this idea that like whether they go twenty five or

497
00:22:43,520 --> 00:22:47,119
Speaker 2: fifty will tell us something more generally about like the

498
00:22:47,280 --> 00:22:51,040
Speaker 2: reaction function and their sensitivity to weakness, what twenty twenty

499
00:22:51,080 --> 00:22:52,640
Speaker 2: five might look like, and so forth.

500
00:22:52,800 --> 00:22:55,879
Speaker 3: Yeah, it does feel like it's a new regime, and

501
00:22:55,920 --> 00:22:58,960
Speaker 3: we're going to learn a lot to your question, which

502
00:22:59,000 --> 00:23:02,600
Speaker 3: I thought was excellent about out the transmission mechanism of

503
00:23:02,640 --> 00:23:05,520
Speaker 3: the interest rate hikes. That's going to be something interesting

504
00:23:05,560 --> 00:23:08,960
Speaker 3: to watch in reverse as well, right, like, okay, well,

505
00:23:08,960 --> 00:23:11,679
Speaker 3: now we're cutting to boost the labor market. Is it

506
00:23:11,760 --> 00:23:14,600
Speaker 3: actually going to work as intended? Or are we going

507
00:23:14,680 --> 00:23:18,240
Speaker 3: to get all these existential questions as we did when

508
00:23:18,560 --> 00:23:21,000
Speaker 3: inflation was high, and you know, there were lots of

509
00:23:21,080 --> 00:23:23,679
Speaker 3: hikes and we were wondering whether or not they worked totally.

510
00:23:23,760 --> 00:23:26,480
Speaker 2: You know, there was a really interesting paragraph in Powell's

511
00:23:26,480 --> 00:23:30,480
Speaker 2: speech where he's like, why did inflation come down? And

512
00:23:30,520 --> 00:23:34,680
Speaker 2: the thing is he said there were essentially transitory factors

513
00:23:34,840 --> 00:23:38,000
Speaker 2: that took longer than expected, and there was the rate

514
00:23:38,040 --> 00:23:40,480
Speaker 2: hikes that depressed demand, But he didn't assign like a

515
00:23:40,480 --> 00:23:43,560
Speaker 2: percentage to either one, So we don't really know, and

516
00:23:43,640 --> 00:23:46,800
Speaker 2: so you have to figure on the way down, we

517
00:23:46,920 --> 00:23:50,040
Speaker 2: really are going to be having all of these same conversations,

518
00:23:50,480 --> 00:23:51,360
Speaker 2: except in reverse.

519
00:23:51,800 --> 00:23:54,560
Speaker 3: We should just record all the or rerun all the

520
00:23:54,560 --> 00:23:56,840
Speaker 3: au thoughts episodes in that verse backwards.

521
00:23:57,080 --> 00:23:59,000
Speaker 2: No, you know, it's like if the story was like, oh,

522
00:23:59,080 --> 00:24:01,000
Speaker 2: the households and the lack of thing and that's why

523
00:24:01,000 --> 00:24:03,560
Speaker 2: it's not working, well, then what's what are the lower

524
00:24:03,640 --> 00:24:06,680
Speaker 2: rates going to do to put that floor underneath activity?

525
00:24:06,760 --> 00:24:06,920
Speaker 4: Well?

526
00:24:06,920 --> 00:24:09,600
Speaker 3: I did notice also he didn't mention it by name,

527
00:24:09,720 --> 00:24:12,280
Speaker 3: but there was this idea of the beverage curve in

528
00:24:12,320 --> 00:24:15,040
Speaker 3: there as well, and so you know, job openings have

529
00:24:15,160 --> 00:24:19,160
Speaker 3: come down without having mass layoffs. But he didn't really

530
00:24:19,200 --> 00:24:22,879
Speaker 3: explain why that had happened. It was just like, you know,

531
00:24:22,920 --> 00:24:25,080
Speaker 3: we thought that this might be a possibility, and if

532
00:24:25,080 --> 00:24:26,720
Speaker 3: it happened, then that would be the key to a

533
00:24:26,760 --> 00:24:30,000
Speaker 3: soft landing. And now it's happened. But he didn't really

534
00:24:30,080 --> 00:24:32,919
Speaker 3: go into why. So I suspect there are still a

535
00:24:32,920 --> 00:24:35,400
Speaker 3: lot of unknowns in how the economy is functioning.

536
00:24:35,480 --> 00:24:38,960
Speaker 2: And he said that too, which is that people will

537
00:24:39,000 --> 00:24:42,120
Speaker 2: be debating these questions until long after we're gone, which

538
00:24:42,160 --> 00:24:44,680
Speaker 2: is like how extraordinary the last four years have been

539
00:24:45,520 --> 00:24:47,280
Speaker 2: will be you know, in the same way they're still

540
00:24:47,280 --> 00:24:49,679
Speaker 2: writing papers about why the Great Depression happened. They're going

541
00:24:49,680 --> 00:24:52,520
Speaker 2: to be writing about what happened from twenty twenty to twenty.

542
00:24:52,680 --> 00:24:54,480
Speaker 3: Four, so something to look forward to.

543
00:24:54,680 --> 00:24:56,000
Speaker 2: Yeah, all right, covering it?

544
00:24:56,040 --> 00:24:56,800
Speaker 3: Shall we leave it there?

545
00:24:56,880 --> 00:24:57,560
Speaker 2: Let's leave it there.

546
00:24:57,720 --> 00:25:00,760
Speaker 3: This has been another episode of the All Thoughts. I'm

547
00:25:00,760 --> 00:25:03,920
Speaker 3: Tracy Alloway. You can follow me at Tracy Alloway.

548
00:25:03,600 --> 00:25:06,360
Speaker 2: And I'm Joe Wisenthal. You can follow me at the Stalwart.

549
00:25:06,440 --> 00:25:09,320
Speaker 2: Follow our guest Peter Williams. He's at Peter D. Williams.

550
00:25:09,400 --> 00:25:13,159
Speaker 2: Follow our producers Carman Rodriguez at Kerman Arman Dashel Bennett

551
00:25:13,200 --> 00:25:16,800
Speaker 2: at Dashbot and Kelbrooks at Kelbrooks. Thank you to our

552
00:25:16,800 --> 00:25:19,720
Speaker 2: producer Moses Ondem. For more Odd Laws content, go to

553
00:25:19,720 --> 00:25:22,880
Speaker 2: Bloomberg dot com slash odd Lots, where we post transcripts,

554
00:25:22,960 --> 00:25:25,800
Speaker 2: a blog and a weekly newsletter and you can chat

555
00:25:25,840 --> 00:25:28,159
Speaker 2: about all of these topics as they're doing right this

556
00:25:28,280 --> 00:25:31,640
Speaker 2: second twenty four to seven in our discord Discord dot

557
00:25:31,720 --> 00:25:33,240
Speaker 2: gg slash oud lots.

558
00:25:33,320 --> 00:25:35,639
Speaker 3: And if you enjoy odd Lots, if you like it

559
00:25:35,680 --> 00:25:38,920
Speaker 3: when we go to Jackson Hole to cover what policymakers

560
00:25:38,960 --> 00:25:41,719
Speaker 3: and central banks are talking about, then please leave us

561
00:25:41,760 --> 00:25:45,760
Speaker 3: a positive review on your favorite podcast platform. And remember,

562
00:25:45,840 --> 00:25:48,240
Speaker 3: if you are a Bloomberg subscriber, you can listen to

563
00:25:48,359 --> 00:25:51,520
Speaker 3: all of our episodes absolutely ad free. All you need

564
00:25:51,560 --> 00:25:54,399
Speaker 3: to do is connect your Bloomberg account with Apple Podcasts.

565
00:25:54,640 --> 00:25:56,840
Speaker 3: In order to do that, just find the Bloomberg channel

566
00:25:56,880 --> 00:26:00,639
Speaker 3: on Apple Podcasts and follow the instructions there for listening