WEBVTT - Accelerating Innovation with Hybrid Cloud ​at the Edge

0:00:04.000 --> 0:00:07.560
<v Speaker 1>Hello, Hello. This is Smart Talks with IBM, a podcast

0:00:07.600 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>from Pushkin Industries, iHeart Media and IBM about what it

0:00:11.560 --> 0:00:14.400
<v Speaker 1>means to look at today's most challenging problems in a

0:00:14.400 --> 0:00:22.479
<v Speaker 1>new way. I'm Malcolm Gladwell. Today I'll be discussing the

0:00:22.480 --> 0:00:26.960
<v Speaker 1>innovations around hybrid cloud with Lumen's David Shakochus and IBM's

0:00:27.000 --> 0:00:31.200
<v Speaker 1>Howard Boville. David is Vice President for Enterprise Technology and

0:00:31.440 --> 0:00:36.240
<v Speaker 1>Field CTO at LUMEN, where he's helped clients across industries

0:00:36.600 --> 0:00:42.239
<v Speaker 1>create new business opportunities through unique digital interactions. David has

0:00:42.240 --> 0:00:45.680
<v Speaker 1>been immersed in cloud computing long before his time with Luhmen,

0:00:45.960 --> 0:00:50.720
<v Speaker 1>working with companies such as Unit, Digital Island and fuse Point.

0:00:51.280 --> 0:00:54.400
<v Speaker 1>You're putting computing capacity in places that didn't used to

0:00:54.400 --> 0:00:56.800
<v Speaker 1>be thought of as data centers before. There's an element

0:00:56.840 --> 0:01:00.800
<v Speaker 1>of novel challenge and so they're inherently there's there's more complexity.

0:01:01.960 --> 0:01:05.440
<v Speaker 1>Howard is the head of IBM Cloud Platform. In this role,

0:01:05.680 --> 0:01:11.200
<v Speaker 1>Howard has focused on driving digital transformation for enterprises, especially

0:01:11.440 --> 0:01:15.760
<v Speaker 1>in highly regulated industries. Before joining IBM, Howard was Chief

0:01:15.800 --> 0:01:18.959
<v Speaker 1>Technology Officer for Bank of America, where he led the

0:01:19.000 --> 0:01:22.679
<v Speaker 1>transformation of the Bank's infrastructure and developed one of the

0:01:22.760 --> 0:01:27.160
<v Speaker 1>largest internal private clouds. The times you have to kind

0:01:27.160 --> 0:01:29.200
<v Speaker 1>of be a technology of angelists in terms of what

0:01:29.240 --> 0:01:31.920
<v Speaker 1>the art of the possible is against the problems. In

0:01:31.959 --> 0:01:35.679
<v Speaker 1>this episode, we'll explore working and living in a world

0:01:35.720 --> 0:01:39.520
<v Speaker 1>of cloud technology. Will show you how new innovations in

0:01:39.560 --> 0:01:43.679
<v Speaker 1>cloud computing have reimagined a world where computing can happen

0:01:43.840 --> 0:01:48.720
<v Speaker 1>anywhere and businesses can use data to accelerate innovation to

0:01:48.840 --> 0:02:07.400
<v Speaker 1>improve service and performance. Let's dive in. Welcome everyone, Howard

0:02:07.400 --> 0:02:11.400
<v Speaker 1>and David. Thank you for joining us today. Let's jump in. David,

0:02:11.440 --> 0:02:15.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna ask you to define some terms and that

0:02:15.960 --> 0:02:18.399
<v Speaker 1>will be easy for you but useful for the rest

0:02:18.440 --> 0:02:22.480
<v Speaker 1>of us. First of all, the Fourth Industrial Revolution? What

0:02:22.680 --> 0:02:27.840
<v Speaker 1>is it? Yeah? Good one, so we can really look back.

0:02:27.880 --> 0:02:32.680
<v Speaker 1>I think on history in these periods of technology advancement, right,

0:02:32.720 --> 0:02:36.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, the period of industry that was defined by

0:02:36.360 --> 0:02:39.560
<v Speaker 1>steam power, the period of history, and the industrial period

0:02:39.600 --> 0:02:43.760
<v Speaker 1>of history that was defined by electrical distribution. We commonly

0:02:43.800 --> 0:02:46.320
<v Speaker 1>think of the third one is really this information age,

0:02:46.360 --> 0:02:52.600
<v Speaker 1>the information revolution of digitization of process creation and online

0:02:52.639 --> 0:02:56.080
<v Speaker 1>connectivity of data. Is this third industrial revolution of the

0:02:56.120 --> 0:03:00.840
<v Speaker 1>digital age? Information technology systems community caating with each other,

0:03:00.960 --> 0:03:04.280
<v Speaker 1>and the advent of all that you can do in

0:03:04.280 --> 0:03:09.080
<v Speaker 1>industry with those technologies, and the Fourth Industrial Revolution is

0:03:09.080 --> 0:03:12.800
<v Speaker 1>really this reflection of the explosion of data that gets

0:03:12.840 --> 0:03:16.120
<v Speaker 1>created by all that connectivity. Taking data and being able

0:03:16.120 --> 0:03:19.440
<v Speaker 1>to acquire it, analyze it, and take action upon it

0:03:19.480 --> 0:03:22.320
<v Speaker 1>is opening up a wide range of new industries and

0:03:22.360 --> 0:03:26.880
<v Speaker 1>new business opportunities and new regulatory challenges. UM and that's

0:03:26.919 --> 0:03:29.360
<v Speaker 1>what we mean when we say the Fourth Industrial Revolution.

0:03:31.720 --> 0:03:35.240
<v Speaker 1>How did Luminum IBM come together, and what's the logic

0:03:35.280 --> 0:03:38.080
<v Speaker 1>behind your collaboration in this field? You can't take the

0:03:38.160 --> 0:03:41.360
<v Speaker 1>heritage of both companies. So limit are a world class

0:03:41.360 --> 0:03:45.520
<v Speaker 1>global networking company. They connect things together at the highest

0:03:45.600 --> 0:03:48.320
<v Speaker 1>level of quality, lowest latency and so on. And it's

0:03:48.360 --> 0:03:51.040
<v Speaker 1>and it's hard through all the actual transformations that IBM

0:03:51.040 --> 0:03:53.400
<v Speaker 1>has been through. Is where a compute company on which

0:03:53.400 --> 0:03:56.240
<v Speaker 1>the software runs and we write that also the software

0:03:56.240 --> 0:03:58.480
<v Speaker 1>in certain contexts as well. So the combination of the

0:03:58.520 --> 0:04:03.520
<v Speaker 1>two capabilities solves for the problem. We've been working together

0:04:03.720 --> 0:04:06.280
<v Speaker 1>for years. I think the the advent of what we've

0:04:06.280 --> 0:04:10.240
<v Speaker 1>been focused on with IBM Cloud Satellite has really been

0:04:10.840 --> 0:04:14.400
<v Speaker 1>initiated by Lumen's investment in making our network a place

0:04:14.440 --> 0:04:17.359
<v Speaker 1>where you can run software workloads more readily and easily.

0:04:17.640 --> 0:04:20.479
<v Speaker 1>And IBM cloud satellite is a great modality that just

0:04:20.520 --> 0:04:23.760
<v Speaker 1>snaps right into that network. Yeah, you work for Lumen.

0:04:24.560 --> 0:04:27.400
<v Speaker 1>Is the simplest way to describe Lumen that Lumen is

0:04:27.440 --> 0:04:31.160
<v Speaker 1>a Fourth Industrial Revolution company. We're we're a Fourth Industrial

0:04:31.160 --> 0:04:34.120
<v Speaker 1>Revolution company because we believe at the core of all

0:04:34.160 --> 0:04:37.240
<v Speaker 1>of it is connectivity. All that data and all those

0:04:37.240 --> 0:04:39.040
<v Speaker 1>sources of data and all the ways that you need

0:04:39.080 --> 0:04:42.480
<v Speaker 1>to interact with that data requires a substantial amount of

0:04:42.560 --> 0:04:46.640
<v Speaker 1>aggregate networking capacity. We're now kind of hitting this tipping

0:04:46.640 --> 0:04:48.919
<v Speaker 1>point in the Fourth Industrial Revolution where the amount of

0:04:48.960 --> 0:04:52.440
<v Speaker 1>data coming inbound from cameras and from sensors and from

0:04:52.520 --> 0:04:55.960
<v Speaker 1>devices and gaming consoles and and a variety of uh

0:04:56.279 --> 0:04:59.279
<v Speaker 1>input sources like that is actually exceeding capacity in the

0:04:59.279 --> 0:05:02.080
<v Speaker 1>other direction. So that's really why for the Fourth Industrial

0:05:02.120 --> 0:05:05.280
<v Speaker 1>Revolution of work, you need massive amounts of network connectivity.

0:05:05.279 --> 0:05:08.480
<v Speaker 1>And that's what what LUMAN does. So this brings up

0:05:08.520 --> 0:05:10.360
<v Speaker 1>the second word I want you to define, and that's

0:05:10.640 --> 0:05:15.640
<v Speaker 1>edge computing, which I'm assuming is edge computing is it

0:05:15.720 --> 0:05:19.520
<v Speaker 1>is a technological response to the phenomenon you've just described

0:05:20.040 --> 0:05:23.240
<v Speaker 1>it is. It's one way to think about edge computing.

0:05:23.360 --> 0:05:24.880
<v Speaker 1>The way we talk about it a lot is it's

0:05:24.880 --> 0:05:30.480
<v Speaker 1>moving workloads software workloads closer to digital interactions, and a

0:05:30.560 --> 0:05:35.120
<v Speaker 1>digital interaction could be between things and people and business models. Yes,

0:05:35.240 --> 0:05:36.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, just to add to some of David's point

0:05:36.880 --> 0:05:38.920
<v Speaker 1>with some kind of practical use cases that we kind

0:05:38.920 --> 0:05:41.839
<v Speaker 1>of we're involved in. So so, first and foremost, the

0:05:41.920 --> 0:05:45.080
<v Speaker 1>edge computing piece actually is joining the analog world to

0:05:45.120 --> 0:05:47.840
<v Speaker 1>the digital world, Whereas until this point you would look

0:05:47.839 --> 0:05:49.760
<v Speaker 1>at the digital world through the screens that we all

0:05:49.839 --> 0:05:53.120
<v Speaker 1>spend sumers time looking at. Whereas on the edge, it's

0:05:53.160 --> 0:05:57.359
<v Speaker 1>actually looking at physical locations like retail branches, like shipping

0:05:57.360 --> 0:06:01.680
<v Speaker 1>concern as, like welds on on a well, but an automobile.

0:06:01.720 --> 0:06:05.320
<v Speaker 1>And there's there's two practical examples. So there's thermal imaging

0:06:05.360 --> 0:06:07.719
<v Speaker 1>techniques that we now use to look at the quality

0:06:07.720 --> 0:06:10.520
<v Speaker 1>of a weld all the way through a production process

0:06:10.560 --> 0:06:15.080
<v Speaker 1>in an automotive plant that wasn't possible, that connects in

0:06:15.160 --> 0:06:18.279
<v Speaker 1>that local location, gathers that data and determines that the

0:06:18.279 --> 0:06:20.960
<v Speaker 1>welders at the actual right quality or on a shipping

0:06:21.000 --> 0:06:24.480
<v Speaker 1>content basis, it's it's the combination of r F I

0:06:24.600 --> 0:06:29.000
<v Speaker 1>D tags, connecting to networks that contract with that level

0:06:29.040 --> 0:06:32.719
<v Speaker 1>of accuracy and giving you that experience. Come in terms

0:06:32.760 --> 0:06:36.560
<v Speaker 1>of the how has this come about, it's because as

0:06:36.600 --> 0:06:40.039
<v Speaker 1>we've become more familiar with the amount of data that

0:06:40.080 --> 0:06:43.440
<v Speaker 1>we can capture through a digital interaction through a screen,

0:06:43.480 --> 0:06:46.520
<v Speaker 1>whether that's a mobile phone or whether computer, and all

0:06:46.520 --> 0:06:48.560
<v Speaker 1>of the analytics that you can then do on kind

0:06:48.560 --> 0:06:53.120
<v Speaker 1>of humans behavior, the same questions that get posed the

0:06:53.120 --> 0:06:56.560
<v Speaker 1>physical locations or physical assets, the physical interactions or the

0:06:56.600 --> 0:06:59.800
<v Speaker 1>physical assets, and it's the wedding of those two things

0:07:00.080 --> 0:07:04.000
<v Speaker 1>create this I T problem. The companies like Lumen and

0:07:04.080 --> 0:07:06.440
<v Speaker 1>IBM sold for at the edge so that you can

0:07:06.480 --> 0:07:10.240
<v Speaker 1>actually tie together the digital world and the physical world

0:07:10.720 --> 0:07:12.680
<v Speaker 1>in the same way as you were capturing the data

0:07:12.920 --> 0:07:16.080
<v Speaker 1>purely from a digital world. And it's then human's curiosity

0:07:16.760 --> 0:07:18.840
<v Speaker 1>that I say, Okay, well we've got these questions answered

0:07:18.840 --> 0:07:21.200
<v Speaker 1>from the kind of the Third Industrial Revolution, I dad,

0:07:21.240 --> 0:07:23.400
<v Speaker 1>we went through. How do we apply that through the

0:07:23.440 --> 0:07:27.480
<v Speaker 1>Fourth Industrial Revolution into the analog world? Yeah? Yeah, you

0:07:27.520 --> 0:07:30.320
<v Speaker 1>know what this makes me think of if I was

0:07:32.000 --> 0:07:35.040
<v Speaker 1>and and start me if this is too speculative if

0:07:35.080 --> 0:07:38.400
<v Speaker 1>I was a basketball coach, I would love to have

0:07:38.440 --> 0:07:41.320
<v Speaker 1>an edge computing system which picked up data from my

0:07:41.400 --> 0:07:44.200
<v Speaker 1>players on the court in real time and told me

0:07:44.760 --> 0:07:49.840
<v Speaker 1>who was getting tired, told me whose performance was subpar,

0:07:50.800 --> 0:07:54.800
<v Speaker 1>told me how quickly someone was responding on defense. And

0:07:55.400 --> 0:07:57.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's a that's kind of what That's an

0:07:57.520 --> 0:07:59.520
<v Speaker 1>example of what you're talking about. How it isn't it.

0:07:59.520 --> 0:08:02.320
<v Speaker 1>It's like the and wor all that had previously been

0:08:02.480 --> 0:08:06.120
<v Speaker 1>entirely analog perhaps perhaps bang on a trash can when

0:08:06.120 --> 0:08:10.320
<v Speaker 1>they see something. But but but that but that in

0:08:10.400 --> 0:08:12.560
<v Speaker 1>parts to the point you're making is in reality because

0:08:12.600 --> 0:08:15.840
<v Speaker 1>that there are tracking devices now on athletes in practically

0:08:15.880 --> 0:08:20.080
<v Speaker 1>all disciplines at tracking how many kilometers are, how many

0:08:20.120 --> 0:08:24.120
<v Speaker 1>miles they're running average pace, And that's been tracked, and

0:08:24.200 --> 0:08:27.080
<v Speaker 1>that will be analyzed at the halftime break or the

0:08:27.160 --> 0:08:29.200
<v Speaker 1>quarter time break to being upon the actual sport that's

0:08:29.200 --> 0:08:30.680
<v Speaker 1>been followed or the third time I guess of its

0:08:30.720 --> 0:08:33.200
<v Speaker 1>ice hockey. So that has been tracked. What isn't is

0:08:33.200 --> 0:08:36.200
<v Speaker 1>the physiological elements that you talked about. But I guess

0:08:36.280 --> 0:08:38.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of that will be at some point because humans

0:08:38.600 --> 0:08:41.520
<v Speaker 1>curiosity will drive into that element to say Okay, what

0:08:41.679 --> 0:08:43.560
<v Speaker 1>what level of fatigue are we are? Therefore, was the

0:08:43.559 --> 0:08:46.480
<v Speaker 1>optimal moment to actually make a substitution of a different

0:08:46.480 --> 0:08:50.240
<v Speaker 1>player onto the pitch? Yeah? Yeah. Or if I'm if

0:08:50.240 --> 0:08:52.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm a hospital, I want to monitor the performance of

0:08:52.880 --> 0:08:57.120
<v Speaker 1>my surgeons. I mean an hour four of a complex operation.

0:08:57.160 --> 0:08:59.320
<v Speaker 1>I would love to be able to in real time

0:08:59.320 --> 0:09:02.760
<v Speaker 1>crunch a whole series of data that tells me, you know,

0:09:02.800 --> 0:09:06.480
<v Speaker 1>who's working well and who's flagging. Another kind of hallmark

0:09:06.520 --> 0:09:08.880
<v Speaker 1>of edge computing is when you really need to correlate

0:09:08.960 --> 0:09:13.360
<v Speaker 1>things locally. Um. You know a public safety use case

0:09:13.480 --> 0:09:16.440
<v Speaker 1>where you know, a gunshot rings out, um, and an

0:09:16.480 --> 0:09:19.880
<v Speaker 1>audio sensor picks that up well, correlating that with all

0:09:19.920 --> 0:09:21.920
<v Speaker 1>the stop lights in the area, all the lights in

0:09:21.960 --> 0:09:25.200
<v Speaker 1>the area, you know, any other public safety device that

0:09:25.280 --> 0:09:29.960
<v Speaker 1>is within a particular geographic boundary. UM. That intense correlation

0:09:30.240 --> 0:09:33.480
<v Speaker 1>of events to other outcomes may need to happen within

0:09:33.520 --> 0:09:36.720
<v Speaker 1>split seconds, uh, you know, for for a public safety

0:09:36.720 --> 0:09:39.280
<v Speaker 1>outcome to be achieved. So so so it's it's not just

0:09:39.520 --> 0:09:41.840
<v Speaker 1>the fact that you know, we're tracking, we're analyzing data,

0:09:41.880 --> 0:09:44.520
<v Speaker 1>and then we're getting lessons learned at halftime of you know,

0:09:44.760 --> 0:09:47.440
<v Speaker 1>which one of our players run around. The more fine

0:09:47.480 --> 0:09:50.880
<v Speaker 1>grained like milliseconds matter kind of use cases is another

0:09:51.120 --> 0:09:57.600
<v Speaker 1>place where edge computing really shines. In step one, you

0:09:57.679 --> 0:10:00.600
<v Speaker 1>analyze that kind of data, say the past coutball player

0:10:00.640 --> 0:10:04.200
<v Speaker 1>or the surgeon after the fact. So you have the

0:10:04.240 --> 0:10:07.480
<v Speaker 1>meeting the next day and you say, you didn't perform

0:10:07.600 --> 0:10:10.400
<v Speaker 1>very well yesterday, Malcolm on the court. But if I

0:10:10.400 --> 0:10:13.240
<v Speaker 1>can do it in real time, then I can actually

0:10:13.280 --> 0:10:17.480
<v Speaker 1>affect the outcome of the game as it's happening. And

0:10:17.520 --> 0:10:21.400
<v Speaker 1>that that shift from being able to make those judgments

0:10:21.840 --> 0:10:25.800
<v Speaker 1>immediately and make those judgments after the fact is huge.

0:10:26.320 --> 0:10:30.040
<v Speaker 1>It's I could win the game, yeah, didn't otherwise lose

0:10:30.200 --> 0:10:33.720
<v Speaker 1>And I'm echoing, I'm capturing your excitement. You are kind

0:10:33.720 --> 0:10:35.800
<v Speaker 1>of echoing that position where we've kind of gone from

0:10:35.800 --> 0:10:39.680
<v Speaker 1>the digital perspective where people are playing online games, sporting

0:10:39.760 --> 0:10:42.200
<v Speaker 1>games and making judgment spist up on what they can

0:10:42.200 --> 0:10:45.000
<v Speaker 1>see from the analytics they get in that digital realm,

0:10:45.040 --> 0:10:47.720
<v Speaker 1>and then translating that into ideas that could be extended

0:10:47.760 --> 0:10:51.400
<v Speaker 1>into the animal row and therefore that desire. You can

0:10:51.440 --> 0:10:54.800
<v Speaker 1>imagine there are people as we speak now putting together

0:10:54.800 --> 0:10:58.120
<v Speaker 1>innitative solutions that can address that very problem. Yeah. The

0:10:58.679 --> 0:11:01.079
<v Speaker 1>other thing too, is it we're talking about all the

0:11:01.120 --> 0:11:04.080
<v Speaker 1>whiz bang use cases and and there's sort of a

0:11:04.120 --> 0:11:06.880
<v Speaker 1>subtext to everything we just said, which is that there's

0:11:07.000 --> 0:11:12.200
<v Speaker 1>good software designed at scale able to run and achieve

0:11:12.240 --> 0:11:17.320
<v Speaker 1>those outcomes better basketball performance, public safety use cases. There's

0:11:17.360 --> 0:11:19.640
<v Speaker 1>software that needs to go and collect all that data

0:11:19.679 --> 0:11:22.120
<v Speaker 1>and take action against it. And the other sort of

0:11:22.120 --> 0:11:24.400
<v Speaker 1>really the dimension, and certainly with a big dimension of

0:11:24.400 --> 0:11:27.560
<v Speaker 1>the IBM and LUMIN relationship is being able to enable

0:11:27.720 --> 0:11:31.400
<v Speaker 1>great software development anywhere that the network can reach. All

0:11:31.440 --> 0:11:34.959
<v Speaker 1>these use cases don't happen unless there's software that goes

0:11:35.000 --> 0:11:38.200
<v Speaker 1>and runs that business logic or runs that analysis, or

0:11:38.360 --> 0:11:42.520
<v Speaker 1>processes those inputs into actionable outputs and respond to an

0:11:42.520 --> 0:11:51.280
<v Speaker 1>event stream. Yeah. Yeah, talk a little bit about the

0:11:51.760 --> 0:11:56.079
<v Speaker 1>cloud piece of this. Why does hybrid cloud How does

0:11:56.120 --> 0:11:59.360
<v Speaker 1>it fit into this puzzle that you've been describing. So

0:11:59.679 --> 0:12:03.959
<v Speaker 1>the hyhbrary cloud space essentially encapsulates all the points that

0:12:04.040 --> 0:12:06.800
<v Speaker 1>David has gone through. So it's a cloud essentially is

0:12:07.120 --> 0:12:10.960
<v Speaker 1>a building with computers in that run applications. And the

0:12:11.000 --> 0:12:14.480
<v Speaker 1>paradigm until probably about ten fifteen years ago was that

0:12:14.720 --> 0:12:16.800
<v Speaker 1>a large corporate would have a big data center have

0:12:16.880 --> 0:12:20.440
<v Speaker 1>its own computers in them and would have that capability.

0:12:20.679 --> 0:12:23.839
<v Speaker 1>And then what created a huge innovation was the actual

0:12:23.880 --> 0:12:25.880
<v Speaker 1>ability for our developer to come up with an idea

0:12:26.240 --> 0:12:29.040
<v Speaker 1>not need to unbuild a big data center for computers,

0:12:29.080 --> 0:12:32.240
<v Speaker 1>and it could actually rent the space and then turn

0:12:32.320 --> 0:12:34.520
<v Speaker 1>that idea into software and turn that software into a

0:12:35.040 --> 0:12:37.920
<v Speaker 1>Facebook or a Netflix or whatever it may be. So

0:12:37.960 --> 0:12:41.280
<v Speaker 1>it reduced barriers of entry, and that was the first phase.

0:12:41.320 --> 0:12:43.080
<v Speaker 1>The first that PHAs that were now in is this

0:12:43.200 --> 0:12:46.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of synthesis between the digital and the analog at

0:12:46.040 --> 0:12:49.120
<v Speaker 1>the edge, and that's the hybrid cloud computing, where we

0:12:49.120 --> 0:12:53.400
<v Speaker 1>can actually create many data centers specific to particular needs

0:12:54.120 --> 0:12:56.400
<v Speaker 1>all around the world, not just within the assets that

0:12:56.480 --> 0:12:58.560
<v Speaker 1>IBM has or the assets that are the cloud service

0:12:58.600 --> 0:13:02.080
<v Speaker 1>providers have. And it's these partnerships. There's also kind of

0:13:02.160 --> 0:13:05.600
<v Speaker 1>new economic models in the marketplace where companies can operate

0:13:05.600 --> 0:13:08.160
<v Speaker 1>with humility to recognize, Okay, we may be large companies,

0:13:08.160 --> 0:13:10.599
<v Speaker 1>but actually we can see the assets in another company

0:13:10.679 --> 0:13:12.240
<v Speaker 1>and the brilliant people that exist there, and if we

0:13:12.240 --> 0:13:14.840
<v Speaker 1>could partner with them, we could create something valuable for

0:13:14.880 --> 0:13:18.360
<v Speaker 1>the marketplace. What the what's the challenge if I'm a

0:13:18.400 --> 0:13:20.760
<v Speaker 1>company and I want to do something sophisticated with all

0:13:20.800 --> 0:13:23.880
<v Speaker 1>of this data. Where am I gonna What's going to

0:13:24.000 --> 0:13:25.960
<v Speaker 1>keep me up at night? A part of this puzzle

0:13:26.800 --> 0:13:28.720
<v Speaker 1>when you have this explosion of data and it can

0:13:28.720 --> 0:13:31.000
<v Speaker 1>be at the edge, the key thing that we need

0:13:31.080 --> 0:13:34.240
<v Speaker 1>to be very mindful of is cybersecurity risk in that

0:13:34.240 --> 0:13:36.320
<v Speaker 1>that data gets in the hands of their own people

0:13:36.679 --> 0:13:38.480
<v Speaker 1>who then can actually use that to their own to

0:13:38.520 --> 0:13:41.840
<v Speaker 1>their own gain, or to whatever purpose they want to use.

0:13:42.240 --> 0:13:44.480
<v Speaker 1>So every solution that has to be built has to

0:13:44.480 --> 0:13:48.280
<v Speaker 1>be built at a very high gradive cybersecurity, so ensuring

0:13:48.280 --> 0:13:51.520
<v Speaker 1>that we protect our customers data and also we protect

0:13:51.559 --> 0:13:53.720
<v Speaker 1>them from the laws, rules and REGs that they have

0:13:53.800 --> 0:13:57.800
<v Speaker 1>to be obligated to. Broadly speaking, you're you're putting computing

0:13:57.840 --> 0:14:00.199
<v Speaker 1>capacity in places that didn't used to be out of

0:14:00.200 --> 0:14:03.880
<v Speaker 1>the data centers before. Right there, there's an element of newness,

0:14:03.960 --> 0:14:07.840
<v Speaker 1>There's an element of novel challenge that you may be

0:14:07.960 --> 0:14:11.840
<v Speaker 1>running into, and so that inherently there's there's more complexity.

0:14:12.040 --> 0:14:14.400
<v Speaker 1>The other thing that keeps a lot of it leaders

0:14:14.640 --> 0:14:16.280
<v Speaker 1>up at night is whether they are going to be

0:14:16.320 --> 0:14:19.880
<v Speaker 1>able to write software and deliver it at a pace

0:14:19.920 --> 0:14:22.200
<v Speaker 1>of change that is actually going to be able to

0:14:22.200 --> 0:14:25.320
<v Speaker 1>take advantage of or or solve the problem they're trying

0:14:25.360 --> 0:14:27.920
<v Speaker 1>to run. So I want to go back. I want

0:14:27.960 --> 0:14:29.600
<v Speaker 1>to do a for example here, because it seems to

0:14:29.680 --> 0:14:32.360
<v Speaker 1>be a really interesting and important point when I raise

0:14:32.400 --> 0:14:36.240
<v Speaker 1>that example of this surgeon and we want to gather

0:14:36.360 --> 0:14:38.960
<v Speaker 1>data from the surgical suite, we want to make sense

0:14:39.000 --> 0:14:41.920
<v Speaker 1>of it in real time, we want to inform the

0:14:42.040 --> 0:14:46.560
<v Speaker 1>surgery itself. But then you also want to share that

0:14:46.680 --> 0:14:50.080
<v Speaker 1>data with lots of other hospitals and use that to

0:14:50.160 --> 0:14:54.520
<v Speaker 1>build some kind of system that can improve surgery generally.

0:14:54.760 --> 0:14:56.480
<v Speaker 1>So what you're saying is, in order to do that

0:14:56.600 --> 0:14:59.520
<v Speaker 1>last piece, which is arguably the most important of the pieces,

0:15:00.400 --> 0:15:02.880
<v Speaker 1>everyone's going to be reading from the same book, right,

0:15:04.520 --> 0:15:06.600
<v Speaker 1>And the key around that is there's a level of

0:15:06.640 --> 0:15:08.920
<v Speaker 1>complexity as also reading from the same book means that

0:15:08.960 --> 0:15:12.160
<v Speaker 1>the actual the format is the same, the language is

0:15:12.160 --> 0:15:14.200
<v Speaker 1>the same, the type face to carry that analogy on.

0:15:14.680 --> 0:15:17.280
<v Speaker 1>So getting consistency in terms of the data models as

0:15:17.280 --> 0:15:21.840
<v Speaker 1>it's known is super important, as is the provenance so

0:15:21.880 --> 0:15:23.960
<v Speaker 1>that you know that the actual quality of the data

0:15:24.440 --> 0:15:26.160
<v Speaker 1>is at the highest level of insecurity. And the reason

0:15:26.200 --> 0:15:28.320
<v Speaker 1>why that's important is you would take all of that

0:15:28.400 --> 0:15:31.960
<v Speaker 1>inside all of those lessons that are turned into data

0:15:32.360 --> 0:15:36.040
<v Speaker 1>and put them into an artificial intelligence model to treat

0:15:36.120 --> 0:15:38.720
<v Speaker 1>what's not as training that model so that it actually

0:15:38.760 --> 0:15:42.880
<v Speaker 1>can come up with hypotheses that are actually continually initiatively

0:15:42.920 --> 0:15:45.680
<v Speaker 1>improved based upon the amount of data. But if there's

0:15:45.720 --> 0:15:49.800
<v Speaker 1>any issue, any corruption in that data, it will compromise

0:15:49.840 --> 0:15:52.560
<v Speaker 1>the actual outcomes. And because the volumes of data can

0:15:52.560 --> 0:15:55.200
<v Speaker 1>be so large, it is actually difficult to ensure that

0:15:55.200 --> 0:15:58.680
<v Speaker 1>actually the outcomes are trained correctly. So there's a huge

0:15:58.720 --> 0:16:00.760
<v Speaker 1>amount of work has to go into ensure the integrity

0:16:00.760 --> 0:16:02.160
<v Speaker 1>of the day to the providence of the days or

0:16:02.280 --> 0:16:05.160
<v Speaker 1>is correct so the AI doesn't get trend in the

0:16:05.200 --> 0:16:09.360
<v Speaker 1>wrong way. Yeah, that idea of software distribution. The in

0:16:09.760 --> 0:16:13.080
<v Speaker 1>our data analytics practice. One of the industries they work

0:16:13.120 --> 0:16:16.280
<v Speaker 1>with extensively is manufacturing. And one of the things that

0:16:16.320 --> 0:16:19.400
<v Speaker 1>we see organizations challenged by, and as a phrase you

0:16:19.520 --> 0:16:21.760
<v Speaker 1>are one of our data scientists uses all the time,

0:16:22.240 --> 0:16:24.200
<v Speaker 1>is that it's actually kind of easy to go and

0:16:24.240 --> 0:16:26.320
<v Speaker 1>collect a lot of data locally on the shop floor,

0:16:27.000 --> 0:16:29.080
<v Speaker 1>and it's kind of easy to get all of the

0:16:29.160 --> 0:16:32.080
<v Speaker 1>data historically that you've ever had once it's available in

0:16:32.080 --> 0:16:34.600
<v Speaker 1>your data center to go have a data scientist analyze

0:16:34.640 --> 0:16:38.640
<v Speaker 1>it and come up with you know, widely held best

0:16:38.680 --> 0:16:42.280
<v Speaker 1>practices and the source of what should be the most

0:16:42.280 --> 0:16:44.960
<v Speaker 1>efficient way to do things and what should be the

0:16:45.000 --> 0:16:48.360
<v Speaker 1>most efficient data model that can analyze all the sensors

0:16:48.360 --> 0:16:50.640
<v Speaker 1>in the factory. The challenges is getting it from the

0:16:50.680 --> 0:16:53.280
<v Speaker 1>top floor to the shop floor. It's fine to get

0:16:53.360 --> 0:16:56.440
<v Speaker 1>that lesson in your shortcore data center. It's fine. It's

0:16:56.440 --> 0:16:58.800
<v Speaker 1>fine to go collect a lot of data. The challenges

0:16:58.840 --> 0:17:01.200
<v Speaker 1>connecting them together, and that's really where this idea of

0:17:01.560 --> 0:17:04.720
<v Speaker 1>consistent delivery of new software when you learn the lesson

0:17:04.760 --> 0:17:06.760
<v Speaker 1>in the top floor says this is the way it

0:17:06.760 --> 0:17:08.880
<v Speaker 1>ought to be. How do you get that code out

0:17:08.960 --> 0:17:11.600
<v Speaker 1>into your built environment so that that software is actually

0:17:11.640 --> 0:17:14.400
<v Speaker 1>taking effect. It's not just a theory that is a

0:17:14.440 --> 0:17:16.399
<v Speaker 1>model in a data center, but it's a model that

0:17:16.440 --> 0:17:20.439
<v Speaker 1>can make a difference. Tell me about how this collaboration

0:17:20.520 --> 0:17:23.920
<v Speaker 1>between your two companies addresses that problem. Can you give

0:17:23.920 --> 0:17:28.359
<v Speaker 1>me an example, Well, yeah, I think what however, was

0:17:28.600 --> 0:17:31.160
<v Speaker 1>alluding to. One of the customers we're working with right

0:17:31.200 --> 0:17:33.919
<v Speaker 1>now is in the financial services industry. But this is

0:17:33.920 --> 0:17:37.879
<v Speaker 1>a digital interaction between the financial services business model of

0:17:37.920 --> 0:17:40.679
<v Speaker 1>banking and the people that walk up to it. And

0:17:40.720 --> 0:17:44.440
<v Speaker 1>there's a security risk out there in the world whereby

0:17:44.600 --> 0:17:48.800
<v Speaker 1>bad actors will target a t M machines and it's

0:17:48.800 --> 0:17:52.399
<v Speaker 1>called skimming, where they'll go and walk up to an

0:17:52.400 --> 0:17:54.840
<v Speaker 1>a t M, put a device that looks same color,

0:17:55.000 --> 0:17:59.200
<v Speaker 1>same fitting over the credit card slot, and surreptitiously scan

0:17:59.320 --> 0:18:01.520
<v Speaker 1>the credit card as it's being inserted into the machine.

0:18:01.880 --> 0:18:05.320
<v Speaker 1>The user doesn't know that it happened, and the bank

0:18:05.760 --> 0:18:08.399
<v Speaker 1>doesn't necessarily know that it happens. In the the the

0:18:08.640 --> 0:18:13.439
<v Speaker 1>point at which they can take most efficial effective action

0:18:13.680 --> 0:18:16.480
<v Speaker 1>against that bad actor is the point at which they're

0:18:16.480 --> 0:18:18.440
<v Speaker 1>walking up to the machine which has a video camera

0:18:18.440 --> 0:18:21.159
<v Speaker 1>inside of it, and inserting that device. And so there

0:18:21.200 --> 0:18:23.120
<v Speaker 1>are certain patterns you can be looking for. Are they're

0:18:23.119 --> 0:18:24.800
<v Speaker 1>walking up to it with a bag, are they reaching

0:18:24.840 --> 0:18:26.920
<v Speaker 1>into the bag? They are they taking on a certain

0:18:26.960 --> 0:18:31.040
<v Speaker 1>posture against that a t M interface to know maybe

0:18:31.080 --> 0:18:33.960
<v Speaker 1>there's further correlation we need to take against this person.

0:18:34.080 --> 0:18:36.520
<v Speaker 1>But so financial companies would look at that and say,

0:18:36.600 --> 0:18:38.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, that could be a needle in a haystack

0:18:38.720 --> 0:18:41.359
<v Speaker 1>kind of analysis problem. And if you get better and

0:18:41.400 --> 0:18:44.000
<v Speaker 1>better at getting closer to figuring out who is skimming

0:18:44.040 --> 0:18:46.680
<v Speaker 1>off your A t M machines and who isn't. Once

0:18:46.720 --> 0:18:48.880
<v Speaker 1>you get good at building that model and then deploying

0:18:48.880 --> 0:18:51.120
<v Speaker 1>that software to all your A t M s, you're

0:18:51.160 --> 0:18:54.440
<v Speaker 1>in a situation where your overall risk to your customers

0:18:54.480 --> 0:18:57.760
<v Speaker 1>and your brand that the payoff becomes immeasurable. So that's

0:18:57.760 --> 0:18:59.520
<v Speaker 1>one of the things that we're working on with IBM

0:18:59.560 --> 0:19:01.840
<v Speaker 1>and some of the great video analytics software they have

0:19:01.960 --> 0:19:04.560
<v Speaker 1>that we can put out closer to some of these

0:19:04.560 --> 0:19:08.800
<v Speaker 1>financial institutions, acquire analyzed, but then act upon the data

0:19:08.920 --> 0:19:16.240
<v Speaker 1>that's involved. Oh, I see. So to your point, the

0:19:16.280 --> 0:19:20.199
<v Speaker 1>insight number one is this particular a t M has

0:19:20.200 --> 0:19:23.320
<v Speaker 1>been compromised, But the much more useful bit of information

0:19:23.400 --> 0:19:27.199
<v Speaker 1>is it's been compromised by such and such a person,

0:19:27.880 --> 0:19:31.560
<v Speaker 1>and we're observing that person compromising it in real time,

0:19:32.119 --> 0:19:36.160
<v Speaker 1>right right, right, So whether that a t M learns

0:19:36.280 --> 0:19:38.640
<v Speaker 1>what a bad actor looks like walking up to it

0:19:38.920 --> 0:19:42.359
<v Speaker 1>in Minneapolis, well that's good. But the key is then learning,

0:19:42.560 --> 0:19:45.080
<v Speaker 1>updating the model, getting that new software tested, and then

0:19:45.080 --> 0:19:47.639
<v Speaker 1>getting it deployed consistently to all the other places that

0:19:47.640 --> 0:19:50.080
<v Speaker 1>can benefit. I want to go back to this partnership

0:19:50.119 --> 0:19:53.439
<v Speaker 1>between Lumin and IBM. You said, you guys have been

0:19:53.440 --> 0:19:55.840
<v Speaker 1>working together for some time. How long when did you win?

0:19:55.880 --> 0:19:59.320
<v Speaker 1>Did it first start? We've had relationships with IBM and

0:19:59.400 --> 0:20:01.600
<v Speaker 1>some of it's a Elia companies in one way, shape

0:20:01.680 --> 0:20:05.240
<v Speaker 1>or form for a few decades. The other thing to

0:20:05.280 --> 0:20:07.840
<v Speaker 1>remember is Lumen is a service provider, right, so we

0:20:08.040 --> 0:20:10.680
<v Speaker 1>contract with our customers to go deliver services for them.

0:20:10.680 --> 0:20:13.120
<v Speaker 1>In a lot of cases, those services have always involved

0:20:13.600 --> 0:20:18.720
<v Speaker 1>IBM software, IBM data capabilities, working with the IBM cloud,

0:20:19.240 --> 0:20:21.920
<v Speaker 1>and so IBM as a technology entity has been connected

0:20:21.960 --> 0:20:25.040
<v Speaker 1>to the end points of Lumen networks, you know for

0:20:25.080 --> 0:20:29.080
<v Speaker 1>all that time. Yeah, what does from a customer standpoint,

0:20:29.119 --> 0:20:32.200
<v Speaker 1>what does the partnership between Lumen and IBM look like?

0:20:33.000 --> 0:20:35.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, are you if I'm that financial service companies

0:20:35.600 --> 0:20:37.639
<v Speaker 1>is trying to trying to stop my A t M

0:20:37.680 --> 0:20:40.480
<v Speaker 1>s from being hacked? Is am I dealing with a

0:20:40.600 --> 0:20:45.240
<v Speaker 1>kind of task force made up of lumon and IBM folks,

0:20:45.680 --> 0:20:47.879
<v Speaker 1>So that the solution that we're putting together there is

0:20:47.920 --> 0:20:52.600
<v Speaker 1>precisely that. So the out of technology companies continue to evolve,

0:20:53.160 --> 0:20:54.959
<v Speaker 1>they have these kind of tusk forces that you talk

0:20:55.000 --> 0:20:57.960
<v Speaker 1>about that actually work on problems and then reapply let

0:20:58.000 --> 0:21:01.639
<v Speaker 1>us technology innovations to those problems. We then create new

0:21:01.680 --> 0:21:04.679
<v Speaker 1>go to market offerings. As I mentioned earlier, kind of

0:21:04.920 --> 0:21:06.719
<v Speaker 1>the business models that are kind of really worked now

0:21:06.800 --> 0:21:09.520
<v Speaker 1>is where you actually get and understand with humility the

0:21:09.520 --> 0:21:11.520
<v Speaker 1>assets that you have as a company and combine them

0:21:11.520 --> 0:21:14.200
<v Speaker 1>with assets of other companies. And the thing that really

0:21:14.240 --> 0:21:16.120
<v Speaker 1>makes it come a live is in getting too very

0:21:16.119 --> 0:21:18.600
<v Speaker 1>smart groups of people together to actually face off to

0:21:18.640 --> 0:21:21.480
<v Speaker 1>those business problems. So the the problem that DIV was

0:21:21.520 --> 0:21:24.480
<v Speaker 1>going through, there was a conversation in the meeting room

0:21:24.480 --> 0:21:26.600
<v Speaker 1>which is, we have this problem, how would you think

0:21:26.640 --> 0:21:30.240
<v Speaker 1>about this? And then we combine our engineers various components

0:21:30.280 --> 0:21:32.800
<v Speaker 1>that we have worked up what we call proof of

0:21:32.840 --> 0:21:35.920
<v Speaker 1>concepts to kind of work through is there are there

0:21:35.920 --> 0:21:37.919
<v Speaker 1>there in some of the solutions that we can put together,

0:21:38.280 --> 0:21:40.199
<v Speaker 1>and then increasingly that becomes something that we would call

0:21:40.240 --> 0:21:42.960
<v Speaker 1>a production offering, which actually becomes more generally available in

0:21:43.000 --> 0:21:51.200
<v Speaker 1>the marketplace. What's the what's the hardest problem is always

0:21:51.400 --> 0:21:54.159
<v Speaker 1>I think called latency is always the hardest thing, and

0:21:54.200 --> 0:21:57.399
<v Speaker 1>it's in the both domains were probably primarily in the

0:21:57.400 --> 0:22:00.000
<v Speaker 1>limit demand, and that's where you kind of forever put

0:22:00.040 --> 0:22:04.080
<v Speaker 1>shing physics to actually get as close to the speed

0:22:04.119 --> 0:22:07.200
<v Speaker 1>of light in terms of how quickly you're you're transmitting data.

0:22:07.840 --> 0:22:10.480
<v Speaker 1>And it's a tough two problem to solve for but

0:22:10.560 --> 0:22:13.359
<v Speaker 1>because of the huge volumes of data and because of

0:22:13.560 --> 0:22:17.440
<v Speaker 1>increasingly humans nature for instant gratification and that we want

0:22:17.480 --> 0:22:21.080
<v Speaker 1>everything now, we want it immediately. And what's hard about

0:22:21.119 --> 0:22:24.800
<v Speaker 1>that is latency is a particularly hard problem from a

0:22:24.840 --> 0:22:30.760
<v Speaker 1>technical standpoint because in some cases latency, you know, latency

0:22:31.040 --> 0:22:33.440
<v Speaker 1>is that is the amount of time it takes usually

0:22:33.480 --> 0:22:37.159
<v Speaker 1>measured in milliseconds, which are less than the blink of

0:22:37.160 --> 0:22:38.960
<v Speaker 1>an eye, but the amount of time it takes a

0:22:38.960 --> 0:22:43.280
<v Speaker 1>packet to traverse between two particular endpoints and a network,

0:22:43.800 --> 0:22:45.919
<v Speaker 1>but those all add up, right. You can sort of

0:22:45.960 --> 0:22:48.760
<v Speaker 1>thinking of it in a computer or a brain context

0:22:48.800 --> 0:22:52.119
<v Speaker 1>as processing speed. How fast can I react to things? Well,

0:22:52.160 --> 0:22:54.240
<v Speaker 1>if it takes a while for the packets to travel

0:22:54.320 --> 0:22:59.520
<v Speaker 1>through their neurons, to use a brain analogy of a network,

0:22:59.800 --> 0:23:01.920
<v Speaker 1>the longer it takes for the packets to process through,

0:23:02.280 --> 0:23:04.280
<v Speaker 1>the longer it takes for an outcome to occur. And

0:23:04.359 --> 0:23:06.879
<v Speaker 1>if an outcome takes too long to process, then it

0:23:06.960 --> 0:23:11.199
<v Speaker 1>becomes fairly useless. Yeah, Yeah. My first question is do

0:23:11.280 --> 0:23:15.520
<v Speaker 1>customers always realize what the potential of all of these

0:23:15.520 --> 0:23:19.240
<v Speaker 1>different pieces are or is part of your job in

0:23:19.400 --> 0:23:23.320
<v Speaker 1>helping people in opening people's eyes to what's possible. You know,

0:23:23.640 --> 0:23:25.680
<v Speaker 1>very at times you have to kind of be a

0:23:25.720 --> 0:23:27.840
<v Speaker 1>technology of angelists in terms of what the art of

0:23:27.880 --> 0:23:30.680
<v Speaker 1>the possible is against the problems UM. And it's not

0:23:30.720 --> 0:23:34.199
<v Speaker 1>because customers don't have the samability to see that. It's

0:23:34.240 --> 0:23:36.000
<v Speaker 1>just very often they don't see that the breadth of

0:23:36.040 --> 0:23:37.600
<v Speaker 1>things that we see when we're working with lots of

0:23:37.600 --> 0:23:40.760
<v Speaker 1>different industries and we can apply solutions from one place

0:23:41.280 --> 0:23:44.479
<v Speaker 1>to another. UM. The other element in terms of the

0:23:44.520 --> 0:23:48.639
<v Speaker 1>pace of adoption in organizations is less about the actual

0:23:48.920 --> 0:23:51.479
<v Speaker 1>people within them, but also the technology decisions that were

0:23:51.480 --> 0:23:54.119
<v Speaker 1>made in the past. Large investments will have already been

0:23:54.200 --> 0:23:56.679
<v Speaker 1>made to actually build the technology environments that they have.

0:23:56.840 --> 0:23:59.720
<v Speaker 1>They're known as legacy environments, and it's getting from a

0:23:59.760 --> 0:24:02.640
<v Speaker 1>leg see environment to the new environment. And that that's

0:24:02.920 --> 0:24:04.639
<v Speaker 1>a tricky dribble in the sense that you have to

0:24:04.640 --> 0:24:06.119
<v Speaker 1>look at your balance sheet, you have to look at

0:24:06.160 --> 0:24:08.000
<v Speaker 1>the amount of work that would be necessary to do that.

0:24:08.560 --> 0:24:10.960
<v Speaker 1>You've got to change everything from infrastructure to lines of

0:24:11.359 --> 0:24:14.679
<v Speaker 1>application code, of data sets and so on. Um so

0:24:14.720 --> 0:24:18.320
<v Speaker 1>it's a very complex environment for our customers to be

0:24:18.359 --> 0:24:21.000
<v Speaker 1>able for other thinking about and therefore, what do they

0:24:21.080 --> 0:24:24.560
<v Speaker 1>prioritize as their next area of innovation relowsy to the

0:24:24.560 --> 0:24:26.760
<v Speaker 1>actual value that they would get for their customers, are,

0:24:26.800 --> 0:24:30.000
<v Speaker 1>for their shareholders or whatever that drivers are. It's really

0:24:30.040 --> 0:24:33.320
<v Speaker 1>interesting the that word I was going to kick out

0:24:33.320 --> 0:24:37.359
<v Speaker 1>of it. Enterprise i T. It's the only context in

0:24:37.400 --> 0:24:42.480
<v Speaker 1>which legacy is an epithet. Right, Like you say legacy

0:24:42.600 --> 0:24:45.040
<v Speaker 1>to an I T person, they roll their eyes and

0:24:45.119 --> 0:24:47.359
<v Speaker 1>you know their their blood pressure goes up. It's like

0:24:47.440 --> 0:24:50.080
<v Speaker 1>nails on a chalkboard. But to most individuals, like what

0:24:50.240 --> 0:24:53.680
<v Speaker 1>is your legacy, the word legacy means like it's something

0:24:53.720 --> 0:24:56.439
<v Speaker 1>to be honored, right, It's something. In an enterprise context,

0:24:56.560 --> 0:24:58.800
<v Speaker 1>legacy just means you've made a lot of decisions already,

0:24:59.000 --> 0:25:00.560
<v Speaker 1>You've made a lot of the say as you've made

0:25:00.600 --> 0:25:02.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot of implementations, you're bringing a lot behind you.

0:25:02.920 --> 0:25:05.199
<v Speaker 1>That should be a good thing. But an enterprise I

0:25:05.240 --> 0:25:08.320
<v Speaker 1>T context and a technology domain, it's really challenging. Yeah,

0:25:08.359 --> 0:25:10.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean that what I've heard played back to me

0:25:10.200 --> 0:25:12.719
<v Speaker 1>is kind of yeah, how that God may have created

0:25:12.720 --> 0:25:14.399
<v Speaker 1>the earthen seven days, but you didn't have to deal

0:25:14.440 --> 0:25:19.000
<v Speaker 1>with legacy. Uh yeah, so it kind of gives you

0:25:19.040 --> 0:25:22.440
<v Speaker 1>a sense as to the differences in an I T context. Yeah,

0:25:22.640 --> 0:25:25.280
<v Speaker 1>one last question, I want you guys to jump ahead

0:25:25.280 --> 0:25:28.199
<v Speaker 1>ten years from now. I've gathered the two of you

0:25:28.480 --> 0:25:32.280
<v Speaker 1>ten years from now, tell me what's top of mind

0:25:33.359 --> 0:25:42.119
<v Speaker 1>in I think what's what's really a huge challenge in

0:25:42.800 --> 0:25:47.080
<v Speaker 1>business and in the ways that business and organizations collaborate

0:25:47.359 --> 0:25:51.320
<v Speaker 1>is this concept of compose ability. And I think compose

0:25:51.359 --> 0:25:54.320
<v Speaker 1>ability of the ability to go break things down into

0:25:54.359 --> 0:25:58.240
<v Speaker 1>simple functions and have them be intercombined. Um, we're just

0:25:58.280 --> 0:26:00.520
<v Speaker 1>still even at the outset of that. You're to see

0:26:00.520 --> 0:26:01.960
<v Speaker 1>that a lot in the cloud, but as we get

0:26:01.960 --> 0:26:04.160
<v Speaker 1>out closer to edge computing in some of these Fourth

0:26:04.160 --> 0:26:09.280
<v Speaker 1>Industrial Revolution use cases, the ability to take and compose

0:26:10.119 --> 0:26:14.280
<v Speaker 1>different capabilities from from an IBM, from another software company,

0:26:14.359 --> 0:26:17.960
<v Speaker 1>from a real estate company that's selling you access to

0:26:18.040 --> 0:26:20.919
<v Speaker 1>run computing capacity at the end of a of a

0:26:20.920 --> 0:26:25.240
<v Speaker 1>physical link. The ability to compose services together, whether it's

0:26:25.320 --> 0:26:28.880
<v Speaker 1>through multiple parties, or the ways organizations even present themselves

0:26:28.880 --> 0:26:31.680
<v Speaker 1>to the world take advantage of us in any way,

0:26:31.760 --> 0:26:35.080
<v Speaker 1>in any slice that you so choose. Compose ability is

0:26:35.080 --> 0:26:37.359
<v Speaker 1>going to open up a massive amount of possibilities that

0:26:37.359 --> 0:26:39.440
<v Speaker 1>it's maybe a little rooted in the here and now,

0:26:39.480 --> 0:26:41.560
<v Speaker 1>but it's it's something that I'm excited about over the

0:26:41.560 --> 0:26:44.240
<v Speaker 1>next five to ten. Yeah, the thing I'm interested is

0:26:44.320 --> 0:26:46.240
<v Speaker 1>kind of the So we're in the midst of ultificial

0:26:46.240 --> 0:26:50.560
<v Speaker 1>intelligence that is increasingly starting to tax the inventors of those,

0:26:50.600 --> 0:26:53.120
<v Speaker 1>which is human beings. So the prefrontal call text only

0:26:53.160 --> 0:26:55.360
<v Speaker 1>has so many energy it can burn it a debt

0:26:55.640 --> 0:26:57.000
<v Speaker 1>and it is being burnt out at the end of

0:26:57.040 --> 0:26:58.840
<v Speaker 1>every day through the actual amount of debt, so it's

0:26:58.840 --> 0:27:04.119
<v Speaker 1>bombarding it. So the intelligent augmentation, so flipping the two

0:27:04.280 --> 0:27:08.080
<v Speaker 1>letters from artificial intelligence to intelligence augmentation so that we

0:27:08.119 --> 0:27:10.800
<v Speaker 1>actually can actually work within these environments in a far

0:27:10.880 --> 0:27:14.080
<v Speaker 1>more commulative style relative to what we can biologically do.

0:27:14.400 --> 0:27:16.160
<v Speaker 1>It's going to be where there's a lot of advancements.

0:27:16.440 --> 0:27:19.120
<v Speaker 1>And I talked about the partnerships between two technology companies,

0:27:19.119 --> 0:27:23.679
<v Speaker 1>so saluminate ourselves, but they'll be increasing partnerships between health

0:27:23.760 --> 0:27:28.880
<v Speaker 1>and bio companies as well as it relates to technology. Yeah, wonderful, Well,

0:27:29.280 --> 0:27:31.600
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much. This has been really fun. Thank

0:27:31.600 --> 0:27:38.440
<v Speaker 1>you very much being a pleasure it was. Thanks again

0:27:38.480 --> 0:27:42.160
<v Speaker 1>to David cos and Howard Boville for talking with me.

0:27:42.680 --> 0:27:46.760
<v Speaker 1>It's fascinating to consider how quickly data analysis can change

0:27:46.840 --> 0:27:51.200
<v Speaker 1>performance in real time, and the endless possibilities of hybrid

0:27:51.200 --> 0:27:56.359
<v Speaker 1>cloud and edge computing, and look forward to witnessing its evolution.

0:28:01.040 --> 0:28:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Smart Talks with IBM is produced by Emile Rostak with

0:28:04.119 --> 0:28:09.800
<v Speaker 1>Carlie mcgliori and Katherine Gurda, Edited by Karen shakerge engineering

0:28:09.840 --> 0:28:14.320
<v Speaker 1>by Martin Gonzalez, mixed and mastered by Jason Gambrell and

0:28:14.440 --> 0:28:20.000
<v Speaker 1>Ben Tolliday. Music by Granmascope. Special thanks to Molly Sosha, Andy,

0:28:20.080 --> 0:28:24.000
<v Speaker 1>Kelly Neil, LaBelle, Jacob Weisberg, Head of Fane, Eric Sandler,

0:28:24.200 --> 0:28:27.959
<v Speaker 1>and Maggie Taylor and the team's at eight Bar and IBM.

0:28:28.119 --> 0:28:32.360
<v Speaker 1>Smart Talks with IBM is a production of Pushkin Industries

0:28:32.760 --> 0:28:36.359
<v Speaker 1>and I Heart Media. You can find more Pushkin podcasts

0:28:36.640 --> 0:28:41.240
<v Speaker 1>on the I Heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever

0:28:41.720 --> 0:28:45.920
<v Speaker 1>you like to listen. I'm Malcolm Gladwell, See you next time.