WEBVTT - Gov. Jared Polis, Sarah Longwell & Ari Berman

0:00:00.680 --> 0:00:04.200
<v Speaker 1>Hi, I'm Molly John Fast and this is Fast Politics,

0:00:04.400 --> 0:00:07.160
<v Speaker 1>where we discussed the top political headlines with some of

0:00:07.200 --> 0:00:11.360
<v Speaker 1>today's best minds, and Donald Trump shared a video referencing

0:00:11.400 --> 0:00:14.920
<v Speaker 1>a unified Reich. We have such a great show for

0:00:15.040 --> 0:00:20.720
<v Speaker 1>you today. Colorado Governor Jared Paulus stops by to talk

0:00:20.760 --> 0:00:23.400
<v Speaker 1>to us about what's going on in his state. Then

0:00:23.440 --> 0:00:28.240
<v Speaker 1>we'll talk to Ari Berman about his new book, Minority Rule,

0:00:28.680 --> 0:00:31.479
<v Speaker 1>the right wing attack on the will of the people

0:00:31.600 --> 0:00:34.040
<v Speaker 1>and the fight to resist it. But first we have

0:00:34.120 --> 0:00:36.839
<v Speaker 1>the host of the Focus Group podcast, the publisher of

0:00:36.880 --> 0:00:42.960
<v Speaker 1>The Bulwark, Sarah Longwell, Welcome back to Fast Politics. Sarah Longwoll, Hey,

0:00:43.159 --> 0:00:43.800
<v Speaker 1>what's going on?

0:00:44.280 --> 0:00:44.600
<v Speaker 2>Nothing.

0:00:44.640 --> 0:00:47.520
<v Speaker 1>We were just talking about what we're going to talk

0:00:47.680 --> 0:00:53.400
<v Speaker 1>about and my anxiety about American democracy. I think we

0:00:53.400 --> 0:00:56.080
<v Speaker 1>should start by talking about something that is actually really

0:00:56.120 --> 0:01:00.600
<v Speaker 1>positive for Joe Biden. We're still seeing Nikki Haley winning

0:01:01.160 --> 0:01:03.920
<v Speaker 1>between sometimes as little as ten, sometimes as much as

0:01:03.960 --> 0:01:08.640
<v Speaker 1>thirty percent of the vote in the Republican primaries. She

0:01:08.720 --> 0:01:11.920
<v Speaker 1>has not been in this election for a number of months.

0:01:11.959 --> 0:01:14.479
<v Speaker 1>It's like a zombie campaign. What do you make of that?

0:01:14.920 --> 0:01:18.559
<v Speaker 3>Well, the biggest coalition in American politics is an anti

0:01:18.560 --> 0:01:20.959
<v Speaker 3>Trump coalition, and I don't think it has anything to

0:01:20.959 --> 0:01:24.080
<v Speaker 3>do with Nicki Haley whatsoever. I just think voters are

0:01:24.600 --> 0:01:28.080
<v Speaker 3>when given an opportunity to vote against Donald Trump, there's

0:01:28.120 --> 0:01:31.560
<v Speaker 3>a highly motivated section of voters, many of whom are

0:01:31.600 --> 0:01:34.959
<v Speaker 3>in the Republican Party, who will turn out to vote

0:01:35.000 --> 0:01:37.560
<v Speaker 3>against Trump. And look, I've been saying this for a

0:01:37.560 --> 0:01:40.600
<v Speaker 3>while about the Nicki Haley voters. Some of those voters

0:01:40.640 --> 0:01:43.880
<v Speaker 3>are already voting for Joe Biden. Some of those voters

0:01:43.920 --> 0:01:46.360
<v Speaker 3>are going to come home to Donald Trump, and then

0:01:46.560 --> 0:01:48.760
<v Speaker 3>the rest we got to fight over because they are

0:01:48.800 --> 0:01:49.720
<v Speaker 3>the double haters.

0:01:49.760 --> 0:01:49.960
<v Speaker 4>Man.

0:01:50.080 --> 0:01:52.000
<v Speaker 3>Those are the people who they don't like Joe Biden,

0:01:52.200 --> 0:01:53.800
<v Speaker 3>they don't like Donald Trump, they don't want to vote

0:01:53.800 --> 0:01:56.760
<v Speaker 3>for either guy. A lot of them are RFK curious.

0:01:57.120 --> 0:01:59.640
<v Speaker 3>And this is the swing voter this time, is people

0:01:59.680 --> 0:02:02.240
<v Speaker 3>who are not happy with either person, which is why

0:02:02.240 --> 0:02:05.600
<v Speaker 3>it's going to be a super depressing campaign because it's

0:02:05.720 --> 0:02:10.200
<v Speaker 3>not about who anybody likes, It's not about anything affirmative.

0:02:10.280 --> 0:02:13.800
<v Speaker 4>It is all who hates who more.

0:02:14.000 --> 0:02:17.080
<v Speaker 3>It's one of the reasons that I think that Trump's

0:02:17.240 --> 0:02:21.760
<v Speaker 3>numbers are continuing to hold in a positive direction for him,

0:02:22.040 --> 0:02:25.480
<v Speaker 3>not the country is because look, Joe Biden is top

0:02:25.520 --> 0:02:27.280
<v Speaker 3>of mind for people, and so they reach for him

0:02:27.320 --> 0:02:31.520
<v Speaker 3>with their frustrations over inflation or crime or immigration. And

0:02:31.600 --> 0:02:34.680
<v Speaker 3>Donald Trump as he sits in a courtroom and talks

0:02:34.680 --> 0:02:38.680
<v Speaker 3>about a hush money payment that was made back in

0:02:38.800 --> 0:02:42.840
<v Speaker 3>twenty fifteen, people are looking backwards on Trump. They're not

0:02:42.880 --> 0:02:45.959
<v Speaker 3>looking forward about what he might do. And I think

0:02:45.960 --> 0:02:48.560
<v Speaker 3>that that conversation. I'm not saying that the cases are

0:02:48.760 --> 0:02:51.200
<v Speaker 3>bad for Joe Biden or that they're good for Trump.

0:02:51.200 --> 0:02:52.640
<v Speaker 3>I think a lot of people are saying, oh, this

0:02:52.680 --> 0:02:54.680
<v Speaker 3>is going to make people more motivated to vote for Trump.

0:02:54.800 --> 0:02:57.800
<v Speaker 3>Anybody who's going to vote for Trump because he's in

0:02:57.840 --> 0:03:00.120
<v Speaker 3>court was already going to vote for Donald Trump. And

0:03:00.200 --> 0:03:02.800
<v Speaker 3>I think that if he is convicted on the margins,

0:03:02.800 --> 0:03:05.320
<v Speaker 3>it has some negative impact on Trump.

0:03:05.240 --> 0:03:08.280
<v Speaker 1>Right, it doesn't have a positive impact. No, I think

0:03:08.320 --> 0:03:10.840
<v Speaker 1>that's an insane hill to die on.

0:03:11.280 --> 0:03:15.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, people get lost in the primary mindset, right, where

0:03:15.160 --> 0:03:17.840
<v Speaker 3>that everything that Donald Trump that's like weird about him

0:03:17.840 --> 0:03:19.920
<v Speaker 3>helps him, which is true in a primary, it's not

0:03:19.919 --> 0:03:20.720
<v Speaker 3>true in a general.

0:03:20.840 --> 0:03:21.120
<v Speaker 4>It's not.

0:03:21.480 --> 0:03:25.080
<v Speaker 1>Also, like Republican primary voters who are still with Trump

0:03:25.200 --> 0:03:29.480
<v Speaker 1>are a completely different breed than anyone else voting in

0:03:29.520 --> 0:03:30.040
<v Speaker 1>this election.

0:03:30.680 --> 0:03:32.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean, look, I say this all the time,

0:03:32.760 --> 0:03:35.480
<v Speaker 3>as for me, as like a real bedrock of what's

0:03:35.480 --> 0:03:38.080
<v Speaker 3>happening right now, which is that the gap between what

0:03:38.160 --> 0:03:42.280
<v Speaker 3>Republican base voters want and what sort of moderate swing

0:03:42.360 --> 0:03:45.760
<v Speaker 3>voters will tolerate. That gap has gotten really wide. So like,

0:03:45.800 --> 0:03:47.920
<v Speaker 3>just let me give you one quick example. Town in

0:03:47.960 --> 0:03:51.600
<v Speaker 3>North Carolina. You got this guy Mark Robinson running for governor.

0:03:51.880 --> 0:03:55.800
<v Speaker 3>Dude is looney toots, right, He's a holocaust denier, says

0:03:56.000 --> 0:03:59.680
<v Speaker 3>gay people are filth, has some real weird views on women,

0:03:59.760 --> 0:04:05.120
<v Speaker 3>call the Parkland shooting kids prostitutes. So not a great dude.

0:04:05.200 --> 0:04:08.080
<v Speaker 3>And he won the Republican primary in a landslip. He

0:04:08.120 --> 0:04:10.560
<v Speaker 3>won by sixty five percent the Republican primary, but he's

0:04:10.560 --> 0:04:14.440
<v Speaker 3>polling in the low forties. And the guy Josh Stein,

0:04:14.480 --> 0:04:17.320
<v Speaker 3>who's kind of just a mainstream LIB running against him,

0:04:17.600 --> 0:04:20.080
<v Speaker 3>is just trouncing him and all the polling, and we

0:04:20.200 --> 0:04:21.520
<v Speaker 3>just did a bunch of focus groups on this, so

0:04:21.560 --> 0:04:23.240
<v Speaker 3>what's top of mind for me? But that, to me

0:04:23.320 --> 0:04:25.560
<v Speaker 3>is a good illustration of this gap. But I'll give

0:04:25.560 --> 0:04:27.880
<v Speaker 3>you a negative theory that I'm holding onto that I've

0:04:27.880 --> 0:04:30.520
<v Speaker 3>started formulating from the groups, which is one of the

0:04:30.600 --> 0:04:37.400
<v Speaker 3>weird things byproducts of Republicans nominating just absolutely batshit crazy

0:04:37.440 --> 0:04:40.800
<v Speaker 3>candidates like Mark Robinson, like Kerry Lake, like herschel Walker.

0:04:41.160 --> 0:04:42.920
<v Speaker 3>You know, there's a bunch of them in twenty twenty two.

0:04:43.279 --> 0:04:46.400
<v Speaker 3>Is that Trump starts to look less insane by comparison

0:04:46.560 --> 0:04:49.360
<v Speaker 3>because they're so out there and so like in North Carolina,

0:04:49.480 --> 0:04:53.040
<v Speaker 3>Trump is still in every average, winning by about seven

0:04:53.040 --> 0:04:55.040
<v Speaker 3>percentage points, which means there's a ton of people And

0:04:55.120 --> 0:04:56.640
<v Speaker 3>I just talked to this group of people, a ton

0:04:56.680 --> 0:04:59.640
<v Speaker 3>of people who for whom Trump is totally acceptable and

0:04:59.680 --> 0:05:00.760
<v Speaker 3>Mark Robinson is not.

0:05:01.160 --> 0:05:04.720
<v Speaker 2>That's strange, but real. Why do you think that is?

0:05:04.960 --> 0:05:09.040
<v Speaker 3>Some of its abortion people don't view Trump as extreme

0:05:09.440 --> 0:05:11.440
<v Speaker 3>on social issues. They think of him as sort of

0:05:11.480 --> 0:05:15.240
<v Speaker 3>a cultural moderate as a result of years of them

0:05:15.279 --> 0:05:17.280
<v Speaker 3>seeing him just in the media being well, they don't

0:05:17.279 --> 0:05:19.839
<v Speaker 3>think this is this guy of sexual morality, you know, right,

0:05:19.920 --> 0:05:22.320
<v Speaker 3>They think he's paid for abortions. People say that in

0:05:22.360 --> 0:05:24.000
<v Speaker 3>the groups all the time, and so like, they just

0:05:24.000 --> 0:05:27.120
<v Speaker 3>don't believe, which is which is one of Trump's superpowers, right,

0:05:27.160 --> 0:05:30.799
<v Speaker 3>He's able to weirdly hawk Bibles and hold them upside down.

0:05:31.360 --> 0:05:34.080
<v Speaker 3>And be like, see Christians on one of you, while

0:05:34.279 --> 0:05:37.920
<v Speaker 3>everybody who's more secular and moderate completely being like, yeah,

0:05:37.920 --> 0:05:40.320
<v Speaker 3>this guy's not a real Christian and he's not going

0:05:40.400 --> 0:05:43.120
<v Speaker 3>to do what the Mike Pence or Mike Robinson or

0:05:43.120 --> 0:05:46.640
<v Speaker 3>anybody else who's sort of deeply who's actually ideologically or

0:05:46.680 --> 0:05:48.640
<v Speaker 3>religiously committed to some of this stuff.

0:05:48.720 --> 0:05:49.600
<v Speaker 4>So, look, there's a.

0:05:49.520 --> 0:05:51.760
<v Speaker 3>Lot of bad news I think, both in the polling

0:05:51.800 --> 0:05:53.240
<v Speaker 3>and the focus groups right now.

0:05:53.600 --> 0:05:55.320
<v Speaker 2>So I want you to talk focus groups.

0:05:55.360 --> 0:05:57.599
<v Speaker 1>I hate Paul's and I sure saying that's why I

0:05:57.600 --> 0:05:58.240
<v Speaker 1>do focus groups.

0:05:58.360 --> 0:06:00.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, where are you focus grouping? And what are you seeing?

0:06:00.800 --> 0:06:02.960
<v Speaker 3>We're still it's early enough that we're still doing lots

0:06:02.960 --> 0:06:06.120
<v Speaker 3>of different places, but we're focused on the Swing states

0:06:06.200 --> 0:06:08.640
<v Speaker 3>more than anything else. We're talking to a lot of

0:06:08.640 --> 0:06:11.080
<v Speaker 3>these double haters, and we're also talking to a lot

0:06:11.080 --> 0:06:14.760
<v Speaker 3>of two time Trump voters who rate him very unfavorably.

0:06:14.800 --> 0:06:17.240
<v Speaker 3>Because we're trying to figure out who's gettable. The reason

0:06:17.279 --> 0:06:19.960
<v Speaker 3>I was starting with sort of the directionally bad news, like,

0:06:20.160 --> 0:06:22.440
<v Speaker 3>look I see in the double haters or swing voters.

0:06:22.440 --> 0:06:24.279
<v Speaker 3>So these are people who voted for Trump and sixteen

0:06:24.520 --> 0:06:26.840
<v Speaker 3>voted for Biden in twenty if you do a group

0:06:26.839 --> 0:06:29.200
<v Speaker 3>of those, you know, there's usually a few of them

0:06:29.480 --> 0:06:31.839
<v Speaker 3>in the group who are either going back to Trump

0:06:31.920 --> 0:06:34.000
<v Speaker 3>or who want to vote for RFK and not Biden.

0:06:34.200 --> 0:06:36.599
<v Speaker 3>On the flip side of that, though, there is a

0:06:36.680 --> 0:06:39.520
<v Speaker 3>whole new group of people. This is my most optimistic

0:06:39.560 --> 0:06:41.640
<v Speaker 3>thing that I've seen. There's a whole new group of

0:06:41.640 --> 0:06:44.120
<v Speaker 3>people who voted for Trump twice and will not vote

0:06:44.160 --> 0:06:46.400
<v Speaker 3>for him again. Now they won't vote for Biden. But

0:06:46.480 --> 0:06:50.400
<v Speaker 3>I suspect there's going to be a very large segment

0:06:50.520 --> 0:06:53.480
<v Speaker 3>of the Republican voting population that will leave it blank.

0:06:53.520 --> 0:06:55.760
<v Speaker 3>And a lot of those voters are kind of these Reagan,

0:06:56.400 --> 0:07:00.279
<v Speaker 3>Romney McCain Republicans who held their nose and votvoted for

0:07:00.279 --> 0:07:03.680
<v Speaker 3>Trump both times. But the insurrection, the lying about the election,

0:07:03.760 --> 0:07:06.000
<v Speaker 3>it was a last straw. And there's a lot of

0:07:06.040 --> 0:07:09.160
<v Speaker 3>these voters in Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania, and I hope

0:07:09.200 --> 0:07:12.720
<v Speaker 3>Nebraska too. And also my other optimistic piece is that

0:07:12.800 --> 0:07:15.080
<v Speaker 3>in some of these tough states like Arizona's a tough state,

0:07:15.120 --> 0:07:17.200
<v Speaker 3>the slide with Hispanics is going to hurt in Arizona.

0:07:17.240 --> 0:07:20.520
<v Speaker 3>But Arizona's been trending toward Democrats. Carrie Lake is on

0:07:20.600 --> 0:07:23.160
<v Speaker 3>the ballot again, which is bad for Trump because she's

0:07:23.200 --> 0:07:23.600
<v Speaker 3>a nut.

0:07:23.720 --> 0:07:26.440
<v Speaker 2>She's such a nut, she's the worst.

0:07:26.680 --> 0:07:27.480
<v Speaker 4>She's the worst.

0:07:27.760 --> 0:07:30.240
<v Speaker 3>And like there will be people who vote for the

0:07:30.280 --> 0:07:32.640
<v Speaker 3>Democrat in that Senate race and vote for Trump.

0:07:32.720 --> 0:07:35.520
<v Speaker 2>Insane. Yes, but here's the thing.

0:07:35.680 --> 0:07:38.800
<v Speaker 3>They're going to get a ballot initiative about abortion in Arizona,

0:07:38.840 --> 0:07:41.640
<v Speaker 3>and I think that's really gonna help. And so I

0:07:41.840 --> 0:07:44.520
<v Speaker 3>still think there's two keys to this election, to winning

0:07:44.560 --> 0:07:47.840
<v Speaker 3>it and saving democracy. One is I wish that RFK

0:07:48.040 --> 0:07:50.560
<v Speaker 3>wasn't in this race, because anything that splits up that

0:07:50.600 --> 0:07:53.400
<v Speaker 3>anti Trump coalition is bad. But if he's gonna be

0:07:53.440 --> 0:07:54.840
<v Speaker 3>in the race, and he's going to be on the ballot,

0:07:54.920 --> 0:07:58.080
<v Speaker 3>then everybody better figure out how to make these voters

0:07:58.160 --> 0:08:01.760
<v Speaker 3>understand Democratic voters that voting for him is a terrible

0:08:01.800 --> 0:08:04.880
<v Speaker 3>idea and help Trump voters understand he's their guy. And

0:08:04.920 --> 0:08:07.280
<v Speaker 3>I think making sure that he works as a as

0:08:07.280 --> 0:08:09.600
<v Speaker 3>somebody who can peel off Trump voters is going to

0:08:09.640 --> 0:08:11.520
<v Speaker 3>be essential. Like we're just going to have to play that.

0:08:11.560 --> 0:08:14.080
<v Speaker 2>Game, right, And he is anti vax.

0:08:13.960 --> 0:08:17.320
<v Speaker 3>He's anti vax. He's also sort of anti establishment. And

0:08:17.360 --> 0:08:20.720
<v Speaker 3>because I've done a lot of groups around RFK. One

0:08:20.720 --> 0:08:23.560
<v Speaker 3>of the things that's interesting about Republican voters in RFK

0:08:24.080 --> 0:08:26.679
<v Speaker 3>is that there's nothing they love more than a Democrat

0:08:26.680 --> 0:08:30.000
<v Speaker 3>who turns on other Democrats, right, they love it, and

0:08:30.080 --> 0:08:32.000
<v Speaker 3>so he has a lot to offer them. They also

0:08:32.440 --> 0:08:35.240
<v Speaker 3>hate a regular politician, they love an outsider, and they

0:08:35.280 --> 0:08:36.600
<v Speaker 3>love an insider outsider.

0:08:36.720 --> 0:08:39.000
<v Speaker 2>That's a really good point. So RFK has a lot

0:08:39.040 --> 0:08:39.720
<v Speaker 2>for those voters.

0:08:39.720 --> 0:08:41.120
<v Speaker 4>And that's one thing you gotta do. You got to

0:08:41.120 --> 0:08:42.319
<v Speaker 4>make O RFK work for you.

0:08:42.679 --> 0:08:44.520
<v Speaker 3>That's going to be just a strategic game that people

0:08:44.520 --> 0:08:45.880
<v Speaker 3>are going to have to figure out how to play.

0:08:46.040 --> 0:08:51.120
<v Speaker 1>It's so interesting because clearly Trump has seen that Republicans

0:08:51.200 --> 0:08:54.760
<v Speaker 1>are RFK Junior curious, so he'll be less the guy

0:08:55.760 --> 0:08:57.520
<v Speaker 1>is a crazy liberal.

0:08:58.480 --> 0:09:00.240
<v Speaker 2>You've heard that, right, of.

0:09:00.160 --> 0:09:00.760
<v Speaker 4>Course, I've heard that.

0:09:00.840 --> 0:09:03.680
<v Speaker 3>You know, Trump figured out a little belatedly that his

0:09:03.800 --> 0:09:06.600
<v Speaker 3>voters liked RFK. Now, some of Biden's do too, Like

0:09:06.640 --> 0:09:09.200
<v Speaker 3>there's just a lot of dams who are kind of like, oh, Kennedy,

0:09:09.480 --> 0:09:12.400
<v Speaker 3>he looks at a spry seventy, he looks younger than

0:09:12.480 --> 0:09:15.160
<v Speaker 3>Joe Biden, and then he likes the environments. There's some

0:09:15.200 --> 0:09:17.240
<v Speaker 3>of that and like you're just gonna have to that's

0:09:17.280 --> 0:09:19.760
<v Speaker 3>an education game. That is an affirmative education game you're

0:09:19.760 --> 0:09:21.360
<v Speaker 3>gonna have to do. And then here's the other thing.

0:09:21.440 --> 0:09:23.040
<v Speaker 3>There's the other thing that's going to win this race,

0:09:23.160 --> 0:09:26.040
<v Speaker 3>save democracy, reelect Joe Biden. Which is one of the

0:09:26.080 --> 0:09:27.839
<v Speaker 3>reasons I like focus groups and not pulling. Is it

0:09:27.920 --> 0:09:31.200
<v Speaker 3>gauges intensity. And the thing about the double haters, we

0:09:31.240 --> 0:09:32.800
<v Speaker 3>call them that because they're people who don't want to

0:09:32.840 --> 0:09:35.240
<v Speaker 3>vote for either guy, but they don't actually hate Joe Biden.

0:09:35.600 --> 0:09:36.960
<v Speaker 2>They Donald Trump.

0:09:37.320 --> 0:09:40.400
<v Speaker 3>They just are like about Joe Biden, like they just

0:09:40.440 --> 0:09:43.400
<v Speaker 3>make guttural noises about why this is their choice. Which

0:09:43.440 --> 0:09:48.199
<v Speaker 3>means that you got to run the hardest, toughest, relentlessly

0:09:48.240 --> 0:09:50.800
<v Speaker 3>negative campaign against Trump to help people understand what a

0:09:50.840 --> 0:09:52.920
<v Speaker 3>second Trump term's going to look like, the fact that

0:09:52.920 --> 0:09:54.679
<v Speaker 3>he's not gonna leave, the fact that he's going to

0:09:54.720 --> 0:09:57.240
<v Speaker 3>be a lunatic surrounded by other lunatics, and you gotta

0:09:57.280 --> 0:10:01.440
<v Speaker 3>go negative so hard every day, relent big saragate game.

0:10:01.800 --> 0:10:03.280
<v Speaker 3>I think that people are going to have to like

0:10:03.559 --> 0:10:05.720
<v Speaker 3>stop kind of wringing their hands. You know, you can't

0:10:05.760 --> 0:10:07.880
<v Speaker 3>roll up your sleeves when you're wringing your hands man,

0:10:08.120 --> 0:10:09.240
<v Speaker 3>and you gotta go hard.

0:10:09.520 --> 0:10:14.360
<v Speaker 1>It's interesting what you're saying, because Biden has definitely got

0:10:14.440 --> 0:10:16.600
<v Speaker 1>He's got two big problems here.

0:10:16.760 --> 0:10:19.200
<v Speaker 2>One is Hispanic support and.

0:10:19.120 --> 0:10:23.480
<v Speaker 1>The other is younger Black voters and younger voters too.

0:10:23.840 --> 0:10:25.880
<v Speaker 1>But I always think of younger voters are kind of

0:10:25.880 --> 0:10:29.200
<v Speaker 1>an oxymoron, right, like, you're going to get some of them,

0:10:29.240 --> 0:10:31.079
<v Speaker 1>You're not going to get all of them. They're young.

0:10:31.360 --> 0:10:34.280
<v Speaker 1>But I know because I have a college kid who

0:10:34.320 --> 0:10:36.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, you have to go and fucking vote and

0:10:36.640 --> 0:10:38.760
<v Speaker 1>take as many people as you can. He goes to

0:10:38.760 --> 0:10:40.360
<v Speaker 1>a small college, but he told me there are two

0:10:40.400 --> 0:10:42.440
<v Speaker 1>people he thinks are going to go from his college

0:10:42.440 --> 0:10:45.120
<v Speaker 1>to vote, and I was like, oh Jesus Christ. But

0:10:45.160 --> 0:10:49.160
<v Speaker 1>the point is, I do think Trump is also hemorrhaging support.

0:10:49.280 --> 0:10:50.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think this is going to be like

0:10:50.760 --> 0:10:54.160
<v Speaker 1>the opposite of twenty twenty, you know, a lower turnout

0:10:54.200 --> 0:10:56.720
<v Speaker 1>election where it's still tight.

0:10:57.080 --> 0:10:59.360
<v Speaker 3>You know, yeah, I mean, I think I think that

0:10:59.480 --> 0:11:03.360
<v Speaker 3>is a entirely plausible scenario. I think that enthusiasm is

0:11:03.440 --> 0:11:07.680
<v Speaker 3>really down overall, and the lower turnout election in the

0:11:07.760 --> 0:11:11.360
<v Speaker 3>off season elections, it's really helped Democrats because the people

0:11:11.360 --> 0:11:13.600
<v Speaker 3>who reliably show up to vote tend to be these

0:11:13.679 --> 0:11:17.920
<v Speaker 3>college educated suburban voters who increasingly vote with Democrats. It's

0:11:17.920 --> 0:11:22.040
<v Speaker 3>why you saw in Wisconsin the Supreme Court election, the

0:11:22.080 --> 0:11:24.600
<v Speaker 3>Democrat pro to Saowitz win by like ten points in

0:11:24.640 --> 0:11:28.800
<v Speaker 3>a place like Wisconsin right off your election. And so look, yeah,

0:11:28.840 --> 0:11:31.200
<v Speaker 3>I mean you gotta hope that enthusiasm's really down for Trump,

0:11:31.240 --> 0:11:33.520
<v Speaker 3>that people either don't come out for him or they

0:11:33.600 --> 0:11:34.200
<v Speaker 3>leave it blank.

0:11:34.280 --> 0:11:34.920
<v Speaker 2>So it could be.

0:11:35.120 --> 0:11:37.320
<v Speaker 1>Look, I don't know, and more importantly, we don't know

0:11:37.360 --> 0:11:40.600
<v Speaker 1>what's happening, and we just we know what we're seeing

0:11:40.800 --> 0:11:44.960
<v Speaker 1>right now more than you know one hundred and eighty

0:11:45.080 --> 0:11:46.079
<v Speaker 1>days from the election.

0:11:46.320 --> 0:11:47.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. I mean, one of the reasons it's super hard

0:11:47.800 --> 0:11:50.320
<v Speaker 3>to predict is when you have two functional incmbents running

0:11:50.320 --> 0:11:52.319
<v Speaker 3>against each other, people don't feel like they need to

0:11:52.360 --> 0:11:53.880
<v Speaker 3>tune in. I mean, this is the thing with the

0:11:53.960 --> 0:11:56.440
<v Speaker 3>focus groups, Like people are they know Trump's in court

0:11:56.640 --> 0:11:58.840
<v Speaker 3>for one of the cases, but like they're not following it.

0:11:59.040 --> 0:12:01.679
<v Speaker 3>They're kind of like these two choices. You know, I've

0:12:01.679 --> 0:12:03.520
<v Speaker 3>been saying to people, it's like the voters have been

0:12:03.520 --> 0:12:06.679
<v Speaker 3>going through the five stages of grief, where like the

0:12:06.720 --> 0:12:09.520
<v Speaker 3>anger that these guys were running again, like that anger

0:12:09.559 --> 0:12:12.920
<v Speaker 3>is those Nikki Haley voters. It's Joe Biden's low approval numbers.

0:12:13.080 --> 0:12:16.840
<v Speaker 3>There's the bargaining, which is the third party no labels stuff,

0:12:16.840 --> 0:12:19.640
<v Speaker 3>the RFK, the maybe Kamalo will step down, maybe Joe

0:12:19.679 --> 0:12:23.640
<v Speaker 3>Biden will still step down. There's like depression, which I

0:12:23.640 --> 0:12:24.679
<v Speaker 3>think we're in now.

0:12:26.280 --> 0:12:28.840
<v Speaker 1>And I want to fact check myself. It's one hundred

0:12:28.840 --> 0:12:31.440
<v Speaker 1>and sixty eight days to the election, not one hundred

0:12:31.440 --> 0:12:31.720
<v Speaker 1>and eighty.

0:12:31.960 --> 0:12:32.520
<v Speaker 2>Okay, cool.

0:12:32.559 --> 0:12:34.240
<v Speaker 3>Anyway, My point is just like we're still a long

0:12:34.280 --> 0:12:36.560
<v Speaker 3>way from acceptance, and when we hit that phase, I

0:12:36.600 --> 0:12:38.319
<v Speaker 3>do think like we'll see things move, but like we're

0:12:38.320 --> 0:12:38.840
<v Speaker 3>not there yet.

0:12:38.840 --> 0:12:41.199
<v Speaker 2>I also do think like democrats.

0:12:41.240 --> 0:12:44.240
<v Speaker 1>I was talking to a member of Congress today, one

0:12:44.240 --> 0:12:47.200
<v Speaker 1>of those members of Congress who's like a ranking member,

0:12:47.520 --> 0:12:51.040
<v Speaker 1>very smart, but not anyone you've heard of. And I

0:12:51.240 --> 0:12:53.719
<v Speaker 1>was like, you know, what's your taake on this right,

0:12:53.720 --> 0:12:55.800
<v Speaker 1>because there are so many members of Congress that have

0:12:56.000 --> 0:12:58.000
<v Speaker 1>the people no one knows who the fuck they are.

0:12:58.040 --> 0:13:01.040
<v Speaker 1>Excuse my friend, I, what's your tea this? And he said,

0:13:01.120 --> 0:13:05.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, I see Democrats overperforming, but I also know

0:13:06.120 --> 0:13:08.680
<v Speaker 1>that Biden world takes us all very very seriously. And

0:13:08.760 --> 0:13:11.760
<v Speaker 1>is running a very disciplined campaign, which is why they're

0:13:11.800 --> 0:13:15.240
<v Speaker 1>going to Pennsylvania and they're going to Wisconsin, and they're

0:13:15.280 --> 0:13:17.120
<v Speaker 1>going to you know, but it is going to be

0:13:17.280 --> 0:13:19.800
<v Speaker 1>just a miserable one hundred and sixty eight days.

0:13:20.200 --> 0:13:22.479
<v Speaker 3>It is, and we're going to live with an extraordinary

0:13:22.480 --> 0:13:25.000
<v Speaker 3>amount of anxiety. But people want to know what they

0:13:25.040 --> 0:13:27.680
<v Speaker 3>can do. And some of it is like, you know,

0:13:27.760 --> 0:13:29.920
<v Speaker 3>be part of turning the vibes around. Go out there,

0:13:30.000 --> 0:13:32.440
<v Speaker 3>push hard for Biden, like there's no point in being depressed,

0:13:32.559 --> 0:13:34.640
<v Speaker 3>Like we got to do the work. Make sure you know,

0:13:34.760 --> 0:13:37.360
<v Speaker 3>Biden's most people's No, it's not their first choice, but.

0:13:37.480 --> 0:13:39.400
<v Speaker 4>Got to dance with the guy who brought you. Yeah.

0:13:39.440 --> 0:13:42.200
<v Speaker 1>And I also would like to add that he wasn't

0:13:42.240 --> 0:13:46.120
<v Speaker 1>necessarily the first choice in twenty twenty either, but the

0:13:46.160 --> 0:13:51.640
<v Speaker 1>coalition got behind him, I think largely because there was

0:13:51.679 --> 0:13:55.440
<v Speaker 1>a feeling that he was very electable against Trump.

0:13:55.679 --> 0:13:56.959
<v Speaker 2>That calculus.

0:13:57.360 --> 0:14:00.319
<v Speaker 1>You know, he's a little older, I get it, Orgu's

0:14:00.360 --> 0:14:03.719
<v Speaker 1>foot whatever, but that calculus has not largely changed. I mean,

0:14:03.760 --> 0:14:07.480
<v Speaker 1>remember they tried an impeachment and it didn't work because

0:14:07.480 --> 0:14:10.320
<v Speaker 1>their their lead witness ended up in jail.

0:14:10.679 --> 0:14:12.920
<v Speaker 3>Republicans, Yeah, I mean, I don't want to be a

0:14:12.960 --> 0:14:15.560
<v Speaker 3>super downer. I do think running with a record in

0:14:15.600 --> 0:14:19.720
<v Speaker 3>an anti incumbent environment, which we are just like perpetually

0:14:19.800 --> 0:14:22.640
<v Speaker 3>in now, like incumbentcy has lost some of its juice

0:14:22.920 --> 0:14:26.160
<v Speaker 3>that it used to have. But I still think Joe

0:14:26.160 --> 0:14:28.920
<v Speaker 3>Biden can win this. I am like less optimistic about

0:14:29.000 --> 0:14:32.280
<v Speaker 3>places like Nevada and Georgia, but I remain pretty optimistic

0:14:32.280 --> 0:14:37.119
<v Speaker 3>about Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Michigan, you know, Nebraska too, and Arizona,

0:14:37.480 --> 0:14:39.400
<v Speaker 3>and I think, you know, you just that's I don't

0:14:39.400 --> 0:14:42.000
<v Speaker 3>think anybody's getting fancy with Florida and North Carolina, but

0:14:42.080 --> 0:14:43.280
<v Speaker 3>that's what he's got to Do's got to hold those

0:14:43.280 --> 0:14:44.040
<v Speaker 3>blue wall states.

0:14:44.240 --> 0:14:47.920
<v Speaker 1>It's a tough Senate map, but it's a weird state map.

0:14:48.080 --> 0:14:49.120
<v Speaker 2>What are you seeing?

0:14:49.360 --> 0:14:51.160
<v Speaker 1>Do you have any hot takes on the Senate?

0:14:51.440 --> 0:14:51.600
<v Speaker 4>You know?

0:14:51.720 --> 0:14:54.200
<v Speaker 3>My biggest hot take is something we were talking about

0:14:54.200 --> 0:14:57.400
<v Speaker 3>on the focus group pod recently, which is politics is

0:14:57.560 --> 0:15:00.520
<v Speaker 3>changing quite a bit, and we don't have of a

0:15:00.560 --> 0:15:04.480
<v Speaker 3>lot of new examples sort of moderates being able to

0:15:04.520 --> 0:15:08.560
<v Speaker 3>win over the other party, like in these really red states,

0:15:08.560 --> 0:15:10.880
<v Speaker 3>like that's getting less and less frequent, where you've got

0:15:10.920 --> 0:15:14.920
<v Speaker 3>like a Democrat that gets elected in a super red state.

0:15:15.080 --> 0:15:17.760
<v Speaker 4>But the places where it still happens or where.

0:15:17.680 --> 0:15:20.120
<v Speaker 3>You can get a non Maga Republican elected is people

0:15:20.240 --> 0:15:25.520
<v Speaker 3>whose reputations precede the Trump era. And so when you

0:15:25.560 --> 0:15:27.520
<v Speaker 3>take a guy like Shared Brown or a guy like

0:15:27.560 --> 0:15:32.359
<v Speaker 3>John Tester, you just have a situation where their reputations

0:15:32.520 --> 0:15:35.760
<v Speaker 3>were forged before all of this stuff. And I think

0:15:35.800 --> 0:15:37.600
<v Speaker 3>that that who and I can give you like some

0:15:37.640 --> 0:15:39.560
<v Speaker 3>reverse examples of that, which is like a Mike the

0:15:39.640 --> 0:15:42.600
<v Speaker 3>Wine in Ohio who MAGA hates Mike de Wine because

0:15:42.600 --> 0:15:46.680
<v Speaker 3>he's kind of a moderate Republican, or even Kemp in Georgia.

0:15:46.760 --> 0:15:48.520
<v Speaker 3>You know, Kemp's been able to withstand it, and that's

0:15:48.560 --> 0:15:51.680
<v Speaker 3>because they forged their identities with their voters and their

0:15:51.680 --> 0:15:54.400
<v Speaker 3>relationships with their voters pre Trump. And I just think

0:15:54.480 --> 0:15:56.760
<v Speaker 3>that's true of Shared Brown, it's true of Tester.

0:15:57.000 --> 0:15:59.240
<v Speaker 2>Case in Pennsylvania.

0:15:59.560 --> 0:16:03.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, in Pennsylvania. And so that I think is one

0:16:03.600 --> 0:16:04.920
<v Speaker 3>of the things that seems to.

0:16:04.840 --> 0:16:07.760
<v Speaker 1>Help Tammy Baldwin though that's a good one, But I

0:16:07.800 --> 0:16:10.920
<v Speaker 1>think Minnesota being on the map is bullshit, Like Trump

0:16:10.960 --> 0:16:14.240
<v Speaker 1>trying to get Minnesota, like that's just a dumb news story.

0:16:14.280 --> 0:16:16.840
<v Speaker 1>He's trying to bait people with Yeah.

0:16:16.640 --> 0:16:18.320
<v Speaker 3>I don't think Trump's going to do well in Minnesota.

0:16:18.480 --> 0:16:21.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, they're smarter. They're smarter than that, I mean.

0:16:21.680 --> 0:16:24.680
<v Speaker 1>Sarah Longwell, thank you so much for joining us.

0:16:24.960 --> 0:16:26.400
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, thanks for having me. Love doing it.

0:16:30.400 --> 0:16:32.520
<v Speaker 1>Spring us here and I bet you are trying to

0:16:32.560 --> 0:16:36.160
<v Speaker 1>look fashionable, So why not pick up some fashionable all

0:16:36.240 --> 0:16:40.880
<v Speaker 1>new Fast Politics merchandise. We just opened a news store

0:16:41.000 --> 0:16:45.480
<v Speaker 1>with all new designs just for you. Get t shirts, hoodies, hats,

0:16:45.800 --> 0:16:51.560
<v Speaker 1>and top bags. To grab some, head to fastpolitics dot com.

0:16:51.640 --> 0:16:57.560
<v Speaker 1>Jared Polis is the governor of Colorado. Welcome to Fast Politics, Governor.

0:16:57.280 --> 0:16:59.920
<v Speaker 5>Paulas Molly, could you hear your voice?

0:17:00.440 --> 0:17:06.040
<v Speaker 1>You are the governor of Colorado, but you also have

0:17:06.440 --> 0:17:10.240
<v Speaker 1>a number of interesting things about you. You've been into

0:17:10.359 --> 0:17:15.600
<v Speaker 1>pot before pot was hot, Well not literally, Molly, not literally. Obviously.

0:17:15.960 --> 0:17:18.119
<v Speaker 5>This is the biggest, you know, scandal I have as

0:17:18.160 --> 0:17:21.040
<v Speaker 5>governor of Colorado's I've never actually tried it. So that's

0:17:21.359 --> 0:17:23.080
<v Speaker 5>now that I never have to run again, I can

0:17:23.200 --> 0:17:23.840
<v Speaker 5>confine with you.

0:17:25.640 --> 0:17:28.520
<v Speaker 1>Pot legalization is now pretty much a thing.

0:17:28.840 --> 0:17:32.160
<v Speaker 5>It kind of stems from like a basic value, bodily autonomy,

0:17:32.320 --> 0:17:35.240
<v Speaker 5>you know, choice, freedom of course, people should be able

0:17:35.280 --> 0:17:38.040
<v Speaker 5>to use marijuana recreationally just as they use alcohol. Doesn't

0:17:38.080 --> 0:17:41.000
<v Speaker 5>mean I'm pro alcoholic pro marijuana. These are choices people make.

0:17:41.040 --> 0:17:41.720
<v Speaker 4>People make good.

0:17:41.680 --> 0:17:44.320
<v Speaker 5>Choices, bad choices, and different choices. It's up to everybody

0:17:44.320 --> 0:17:47.280
<v Speaker 5>to live their own lives. Obviously marijuana is part of that.

0:17:47.320 --> 0:17:47.800
<v Speaker 4>And you're right.

0:17:47.840 --> 0:17:49.760
<v Speaker 5>I was at the pot party before it became the

0:17:49.760 --> 0:17:52.800
<v Speaker 5>popular party. I was always for legal marijuana back when

0:17:53.280 --> 0:17:55.520
<v Speaker 5>you know, Colorado was one the first date to do it. Actually,

0:17:55.520 --> 0:17:56.720
<v Speaker 5>I supported the ballot inshative.

0:17:56.840 --> 0:18:00.520
<v Speaker 1>Wait, so you're term limited out as governor, but you

0:18:00.720 --> 0:18:02.280
<v Speaker 1>still might run for something else.

0:18:02.600 --> 0:18:04.480
<v Speaker 5>Well, two and a half years left, and I hope

0:18:04.560 --> 0:18:08.280
<v Speaker 5>my failure to try marijuana doesn't pull me down.

0:18:08.800 --> 0:18:11.639
<v Speaker 1>But just because you can't run for governor again doesn't

0:18:11.680 --> 0:18:13.280
<v Speaker 1>mean you won't run for something else.

0:18:13.520 --> 0:18:16.040
<v Speaker 5>Well, I mean, I not something I think about, LOLLI.

0:18:16.160 --> 0:18:18.560
<v Speaker 5>But if I do, I don't think the lack of

0:18:18.600 --> 0:18:20.480
<v Speaker 5>trying marijuana will be the end of it.

0:18:21.080 --> 0:18:23.639
<v Speaker 1>Yes, well, I've moved on from the marijuana at this point.

0:18:23.920 --> 0:18:24.359
<v Speaker 4>I'm glad.

0:18:24.400 --> 0:18:26.520
<v Speaker 5>I'm glad. It was sort of a fling in your youth, Lolly.

0:18:26.600 --> 0:18:28.600
<v Speaker 5>You just had a brief like in college or something.

0:18:28.760 --> 0:18:31.359
<v Speaker 1>Well, No, I've been sober since I was a teenager.

0:18:31.480 --> 0:18:33.199
<v Speaker 4>Good for you, good believe it or not.

0:18:33.280 --> 0:18:36.560
<v Speaker 1>So I don't have any particular personal horse in the

0:18:36.600 --> 0:18:37.800
<v Speaker 1>marijuana stuff race.

0:18:38.000 --> 0:18:38.960
<v Speaker 4>I'm glad you've moved on.

0:18:39.359 --> 0:18:42.359
<v Speaker 1>Yes, I know that it's wildly popular, and I know

0:18:42.480 --> 0:18:47.320
<v Speaker 1>that you have these libertarian leanings despite being a Democrat,

0:18:47.400 --> 0:18:50.440
<v Speaker 1>and it seems like right now is a time when

0:18:50.840 --> 0:18:53.360
<v Speaker 1>there is a wide lane.

0:18:53.600 --> 0:18:56.760
<v Speaker 2>For libertarians in the Democratic Party.

0:18:57.040 --> 0:18:59.040
<v Speaker 4>Well, I would say probably in both parties.

0:18:59.119 --> 0:19:02.080
<v Speaker 5>There's an opportunity for that because you know, anybody who

0:19:02.160 --> 0:19:05.560
<v Speaker 5>speaks the language of freedom, of choice, of empowerment, I

0:19:05.560 --> 0:19:07.160
<v Speaker 5>think that can be a winning message.

0:19:06.880 --> 0:19:07.400
<v Speaker 4>On either side.

0:19:07.400 --> 0:19:10.760
<v Speaker 5>It's one that's often not heard enough on either side either.

0:19:11.160 --> 0:19:13.520
<v Speaker 5>So it's certainly always been part of what I've talked

0:19:13.520 --> 0:19:16.200
<v Speaker 5>about as a member of Congress and now as governor.

0:19:16.480 --> 0:19:19.720
<v Speaker 1>Is it really available in both parties because like what

0:19:19.800 --> 0:19:24.919
<v Speaker 1>I'm seeing on the Republican side, certainly not maybe not

0:19:25.080 --> 0:19:28.320
<v Speaker 1>from a Mitch McConnell, but certainly from Madonald Trump is

0:19:28.359 --> 0:19:31.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot and the Heritage Foundation is a lot of

0:19:31.600 --> 0:19:35.240
<v Speaker 1>interest in regulation, whether it comes to IVF or birth

0:19:35.320 --> 0:19:37.119
<v Speaker 1>control pills or abortion.

0:19:37.840 --> 0:19:40.639
<v Speaker 5>Oh no, absolutely, the main serare Republican party is very

0:19:40.720 --> 0:19:43.359
<v Speaker 5>much command and control or strict freedom. I'm talking about

0:19:43.359 --> 0:19:45.960
<v Speaker 5>folks like Justin Amash and back in the day, Ron

0:19:46.000 --> 0:19:49.200
<v Speaker 5>Paul Lesso, his son. But yeah, absolutely there's a lane there.

0:19:49.280 --> 0:19:51.720
<v Speaker 5>You see people doing it, but it's you know, it's

0:19:51.880 --> 0:19:54.960
<v Speaker 5>it's lonely on either side sometimes, but certainly in terms

0:19:55.000 --> 0:19:58.040
<v Speaker 5>of the bodily autonomy, personal freedom side, a lot better

0:19:58.119 --> 0:20:01.159
<v Speaker 5>time to be a Democrat to support Democrat. Republicans are

0:20:01.160 --> 0:20:03.720
<v Speaker 5>really trying to control everything people do through government.

0:20:03.760 --> 0:20:05.639
<v Speaker 1>I mean you're saying that statement, I'm thinking about it.

0:20:05.640 --> 0:20:09.320
<v Speaker 1>It's such an insane time in American politics because that

0:20:09.600 --> 0:20:11.439
<v Speaker 1>maybe it was what they set out to do. But

0:20:11.520 --> 0:20:14.440
<v Speaker 1>I think the party's gone really far afield. You are

0:20:14.720 --> 0:20:19.439
<v Speaker 1>in Colorado. It has become a really reliably blue state.

0:20:19.760 --> 0:20:22.080
<v Speaker 1>How do you think Democrats have won hearts of minds

0:20:22.080 --> 0:20:22.760
<v Speaker 1>in Colorado?

0:20:23.080 --> 0:20:25.000
<v Speaker 5>So, I think the important thing you know about Colorado

0:20:25.119 --> 0:20:27.920
<v Speaker 5>for you and your listeners is it's really an independent state.

0:20:27.960 --> 0:20:31.440
<v Speaker 5>The plurality of voters and actually, quite soon, Molly, it'll

0:20:31.480 --> 0:20:33.800
<v Speaker 5>be the actual majority of voters will be unaffiliated voters,

0:20:33.840 --> 0:20:36.879
<v Speaker 5>neither Democratic nor Republican, and they're on loan to the Democrats. Yes,

0:20:36.920 --> 0:20:39.359
<v Speaker 5>they're supporting Democrats, doesn't mean they're in love with Democrats,

0:20:39.359 --> 0:20:42.560
<v Speaker 5>but frankly, they're not Donald Trump Republicans, to be clear.

0:20:42.640 --> 0:20:45.520
<v Speaker 5>So the state they're waiting for, George Bush, mid Romney

0:20:45.600 --> 0:20:48.560
<v Speaker 5>ran strong here. Obama was also very strong, But this

0:20:48.680 --> 0:20:51.600
<v Speaker 5>is not a Donald Trump state. It's very well educated

0:20:51.760 --> 0:20:54.639
<v Speaker 5>and thoughtful Republicans. And you know, again, I think they

0:20:54.720 --> 0:20:57.120
<v Speaker 5>can win the independent vote, but not with the candidates

0:20:57.119 --> 0:20:59.280
<v Speaker 5>that they've been running lately, and so those inde bed

0:20:59.400 --> 0:21:01.320
<v Speaker 5>votes have been on owned Democrats, which is why right

0:21:01.359 --> 0:21:04.240
<v Speaker 5>now Democrats control both US Senate SA, it's both chambers

0:21:04.240 --> 0:21:05.080
<v Speaker 5>of the state legislature.

0:21:05.320 --> 0:21:08.119
<v Speaker 1>You have gotten a bunch of Democrats mad at you

0:21:08.240 --> 0:21:10.920
<v Speaker 1>recently because six spills.

0:21:10.920 --> 0:21:12.800
<v Speaker 2>You vetoed talk to us about that.

0:21:13.160 --> 0:21:13.639
<v Speaker 4>What were year?

0:21:13.680 --> 0:21:15.880
<v Speaker 5>I mean year, I veto some bills. I think last

0:21:15.920 --> 0:21:18.000
<v Speaker 5>year was the year I vto the most ten. But

0:21:18.320 --> 0:21:20.879
<v Speaker 5>keep in mind, I sign, you know, three hundred or so.

0:21:21.000 --> 0:21:22.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, I'm just curious.

0:21:22.880 --> 0:21:26.440
<v Speaker 1>There are endless problems with legislation, and some of them

0:21:26.520 --> 0:21:29.440
<v Speaker 1>are sort of you know, just with the legislation being

0:21:29.640 --> 0:21:32.480
<v Speaker 1>badly written or I'm just curious with the.

0:21:32.720 --> 0:21:35.360
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I would say every year. It changes year to year,

0:21:35.400 --> 0:21:39.119
<v Speaker 5>but usually the majority the concept is okay, but it

0:21:39.240 --> 0:21:41.560
<v Speaker 5>just wasn't sort of fixed. The words aren't right, and

0:21:41.600 --> 0:21:44.240
<v Speaker 5>it has unintended consequences. So I feel it's better for

0:21:44.320 --> 0:21:46.159
<v Speaker 5>them to go back and work on it for another

0:21:46.240 --> 0:21:48.800
<v Speaker 5>year rather than you know, deal with the product that

0:21:48.840 --> 0:21:51.679
<v Speaker 5>could lead to the wrong outcomes. So that's probably seventy

0:21:51.720 --> 0:21:53.760
<v Speaker 5>percent of the time. The thirty percent of the time

0:21:53.800 --> 0:21:56.240
<v Speaker 5>it's one that I disagree with or just you know,

0:21:56.320 --> 0:21:58.520
<v Speaker 5>don't think it's a good way to go. So it

0:21:58.560 --> 0:22:00.320
<v Speaker 5>just sort of depends on the bill. But I every

0:22:00.359 --> 0:22:02.520
<v Speaker 5>single bill that reaches me. In the way our legislature

0:22:02.520 --> 0:22:05.960
<v Speaker 5>works in Colorado, Moley, each legislator gets five bills sixty

0:22:05.960 --> 0:22:08.399
<v Speaker 5>five and hours thirty five cent. That's five hundred bills.

0:22:08.560 --> 0:22:10.760
<v Speaker 5>There's a few special bills, but usually there's about four

0:22:10.840 --> 0:22:12.879
<v Speaker 5>hundred that reach me, or so three to four hundred

0:22:13.040 --> 0:22:16.440
<v Speaker 5>each one. I get a legal analysis, policy analysis, fiscal analysis,

0:22:16.440 --> 0:22:18.800
<v Speaker 5>make a decision, and that's how that works. So, you know,

0:22:18.960 --> 0:22:21.720
<v Speaker 5>like any executive, I don't have a formative role a

0:22:21.800 --> 0:22:23.080
<v Speaker 5>lawmake you know, That's what I did when I was

0:22:23.119 --> 0:22:24.880
<v Speaker 5>a member of Congress. But I do have a yay

0:22:25.000 --> 0:22:25.919
<v Speaker 5>or at a at the end.

0:22:26.000 --> 0:22:29.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And what are the sort of things that you're

0:22:29.080 --> 0:22:33.080
<v Speaker 1>because you are, you know, seeing different voters than I am,

0:22:33.240 --> 0:22:35.240
<v Speaker 1>and you're talking to people and you really got a

0:22:35.240 --> 0:22:37.119
<v Speaker 1>good sense of the state. What are the sort of

0:22:37.240 --> 0:22:39.960
<v Speaker 1>things that people care about your constituents Right.

0:22:39.800 --> 0:22:42.760
<v Speaker 5>Now, that's a number one in Colorado. Probably it's the

0:22:42.760 --> 0:22:44.959
<v Speaker 5>same across country as costs. Just costs have gone up,

0:22:45.000 --> 0:22:47.600
<v Speaker 5>and housing here is front and central, as it is

0:22:47.640 --> 0:22:50.000
<v Speaker 5>in not every market, but many markets, because part of

0:22:50.000 --> 0:22:52.159
<v Speaker 5>what drives it is interest in mortgage rates, right, so

0:22:52.200 --> 0:22:54.600
<v Speaker 5>that's been tougher everywhere. But on top of that, we've

0:22:54.640 --> 0:22:56.920
<v Speaker 5>had a significant run up in the cost of a hole.

0:22:56.960 --> 0:22:59.200
<v Speaker 5>But on top of it's groceries, it's gas, it's all

0:22:59.280 --> 0:23:02.720
<v Speaker 5>that inflation, insurance, right, all those things. So we really

0:23:02.720 --> 0:23:06.320
<v Speaker 5>focused our agenda around, you know, reducing cost, reducing taxes,

0:23:06.359 --> 0:23:08.439
<v Speaker 5>saving people money. That's a big part of what we

0:23:08.480 --> 0:23:10.640
<v Speaker 5>talk about. Housing reforums we might get into. We've done

0:23:10.640 --> 0:23:12.560
<v Speaker 5>a lot of that to build more housing. That's really

0:23:12.600 --> 0:23:14.679
<v Speaker 5>the number one issue right now, i'd say, followed probably

0:23:14.680 --> 0:23:18.200
<v Speaker 5>by public safety, and then you know, like always education

0:23:18.359 --> 0:23:20.960
<v Speaker 5>strong perennial issue. People care about their kids, in schools

0:23:20.960 --> 0:23:22.280
<v Speaker 5>and education opportunities.

0:23:22.520 --> 0:23:26.200
<v Speaker 1>So you did sign into law House Built thirteen thirteen

0:23:26.240 --> 0:23:30.560
<v Speaker 1>in which is a zoning law basically helping build multi

0:23:30.560 --> 0:23:33.520
<v Speaker 1>story houses. These are the things that you have to

0:23:33.560 --> 0:23:37.080
<v Speaker 1>sort of push up against. How is that going? And

0:23:37.320 --> 0:23:38.720
<v Speaker 1>is there a lot of resistance?

0:23:39.240 --> 0:23:39.480
<v Speaker 4>Yeah?

0:23:39.520 --> 0:23:41.240
<v Speaker 5>So you know, why is the cost of housing so

0:23:41.320 --> 0:23:44.440
<v Speaker 5>high in Colorado? The average home costs in the Denver

0:23:44.520 --> 0:23:46.800
<v Speaker 5>metro area is about six hundred thousand dollars, you know,

0:23:46.920 --> 0:23:50.400
<v Speaker 5>state state wide, it's maybe four eighty. So it's expensive.

0:23:50.560 --> 0:23:52.760
<v Speaker 5>And yes, you could be in southern California and say wow,

0:23:52.760 --> 0:23:54.959
<v Speaker 5>that's cheap, right, or in New York City, but like

0:23:55.080 --> 0:23:57.520
<v Speaker 5>for our standards, it's expensive, and compared to our neighboring states,

0:23:57.520 --> 0:24:01.080
<v Speaker 5>it's expensive. So why is it expensive? High demand? That's good,

0:24:01.119 --> 0:24:02.760
<v Speaker 5>people want to live in Colorado. Great place to live,

0:24:02.800 --> 0:24:05.160
<v Speaker 5>great raised to raise of family, outdoor recreation, all that stuff.

0:24:05.200 --> 0:24:08.520
<v Speaker 5>But supply has been artificially constrained. We simply haven't allowed

0:24:08.600 --> 0:24:10.280
<v Speaker 5>enough ones to be built to keep up with supply

0:24:10.400 --> 0:24:12.600
<v Speaker 5>with demand, and that's what serven crisis up. So we

0:24:12.720 --> 0:24:15.600
<v Speaker 5>focused our reforms on allowing more housing to be built,

0:24:15.840 --> 0:24:18.760
<v Speaker 5>not everywhere. You know, we don't want to sprawl further

0:24:18.800 --> 0:24:21.200
<v Speaker 5>out of more traffick and congestion ruin our quality of life.

0:24:21.200 --> 0:24:22.359
<v Speaker 5>We want to do it in a way that protects

0:24:22.359 --> 0:24:23.120
<v Speaker 5>our quality of life.

0:24:23.119 --> 0:24:23.800
<v Speaker 4>And what does that mean.

0:24:24.040 --> 0:24:26.520
<v Speaker 5>It means more housing closer to job centers and on

0:24:26.600 --> 0:24:29.760
<v Speaker 5>transit lines. And the bill you mentioned specifically allows multi

0:24:29.880 --> 0:24:33.679
<v Speaker 5>family along transit lines near job centers. And that's an

0:24:33.680 --> 0:24:35.760
<v Speaker 5>important piece of what we need to do to make

0:24:35.760 --> 0:24:38.879
<v Speaker 5>housing more affordable, more livable, and more sustainable in Colorado.

0:24:39.080 --> 0:24:42.199
<v Speaker 1>Do you get pushback from the I mean, is that

0:24:42.359 --> 0:24:43.600
<v Speaker 1>a delicate balance?

0:24:43.960 --> 0:24:46.200
<v Speaker 5>Well, of course, we actually and you might have noted,

0:24:46.359 --> 0:24:48.320
<v Speaker 5>we actually did not succeed last year getting this through

0:24:48.320 --> 0:24:48.840
<v Speaker 5>the legislator.

0:24:48.920 --> 0:24:49.640
<v Speaker 4>We did this year.

0:24:49.680 --> 0:24:52.240
<v Speaker 5>We had kind of an omnibus housing bill for lad

0:24:52.359 --> 0:24:54.480
<v Speaker 5>use last year. It didn't quite make it. It made

0:24:54.480 --> 0:24:56.400
<v Speaker 5>it past one chamber or not the other. We broke

0:24:56.440 --> 0:24:59.040
<v Speaker 5>it up into six different bills. They all made it

0:24:59.080 --> 0:25:01.040
<v Speaker 5>to my desk, and we're going to build on them

0:25:01.080 --> 0:25:02.800
<v Speaker 5>all in the future. But it equals over like we

0:25:02.840 --> 0:25:06.560
<v Speaker 5>got rid of parking restrictions. We allowed accessory dwelling units

0:25:06.560 --> 0:25:08.159
<v Speaker 5>by right, so people can build it as long as

0:25:08.200 --> 0:25:10.240
<v Speaker 5>there are lots of certain size. A mother mother in

0:25:10.320 --> 0:25:12.360
<v Speaker 5>law and ready flat. So you know, these things add

0:25:12.440 --> 0:25:15.480
<v Speaker 5>up to a real solution broadly popular the people of

0:25:15.520 --> 0:25:19.199
<v Speaker 5>Colorado obviously, you know, doesn't mean it's universally popular as

0:25:19.200 --> 0:25:21.560
<v Speaker 5>people who post it, but majorities of Republicans, Democrats, and

0:25:21.600 --> 0:25:24.680
<v Speaker 5>Independence all are strongly supportive of these measures to create

0:25:24.680 --> 0:25:25.240
<v Speaker 5>more housing.

0:25:25.720 --> 0:25:30.240
<v Speaker 1>What else can you do as a governor to decrease inflation?

0:25:30.440 --> 0:25:33.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, and you know Florida has this crazy inflation

0:25:33.600 --> 0:25:37.120
<v Speaker 1>largely driven by insurance. Is there anything you guys can

0:25:37.160 --> 0:25:40.560
<v Speaker 1>do with the insurance markets and also just to lower

0:25:40.800 --> 0:25:44.280
<v Speaker 1>inflation those costs in a state like Colorado.

0:25:44.480 --> 0:25:46.960
<v Speaker 5>Well, look, and we all know that inflation is really

0:25:47.000 --> 0:25:50.760
<v Speaker 5>a function of monetary policy, fiscal policy federally, they might

0:25:50.880 --> 0:25:53.320
<v Speaker 5>vary a fraction of a point between different markets. And

0:25:53.359 --> 0:25:55.800
<v Speaker 5>obviously a place with a hot housing market has like

0:25:56.000 --> 0:25:59.000
<v Speaker 5>Colorado has had, in Florida has had that drives inflation,

0:25:59.080 --> 0:26:00.679
<v Speaker 5>because that's one of the facts. But no, can we

0:26:00.680 --> 0:26:01.760
<v Speaker 5>affect overall inflation?

0:26:02.000 --> 0:26:03.879
<v Speaker 1>Wait, I'm going to push back on you for a second.

0:26:03.880 --> 0:26:06.720
<v Speaker 1>In Florida, the housing market is hot, but you know,

0:26:06.760 --> 0:26:09.920
<v Speaker 1>the insurers have been monopoly and also climate.

0:26:09.640 --> 0:26:13.240
<v Speaker 5>Change, Yeah, and their particular model, I know, is driven

0:26:13.240 --> 0:26:15.960
<v Speaker 5>out many private insurers and forced the government to do that.

0:26:16.240 --> 0:26:17.960
<v Speaker 5>I would say, first of all, look at an insurance.

0:26:18.040 --> 0:26:20.040
<v Speaker 5>Is it a problem here? Yes? Why because that we

0:26:20.160 --> 0:26:21.840
<v Speaker 5>thankfully out of the hurricanes, but we have a higher

0:26:21.880 --> 0:26:24.720
<v Speaker 5>risk of fire. So people's insurance rates across our state

0:26:24.760 --> 0:26:27.480
<v Speaker 5>in general have gone up more than inflation. Absolutely the

0:26:27.520 --> 0:26:29.479
<v Speaker 5>last couple of years. We had the Marshall Fire two

0:26:29.560 --> 0:26:32.480
<v Speaker 5>years ago, most destructive wildfire in the history of the state.

0:26:32.520 --> 0:26:36.720
<v Speaker 5>Destroyed destroyed over a thousand homes. So that drives insurance.

0:26:37.040 --> 0:26:38.480
<v Speaker 5>What do we need to do. It's not so much

0:26:38.480 --> 0:26:40.560
<v Speaker 5>that the insurance side has broken, but we need to

0:26:40.560 --> 0:26:42.359
<v Speaker 5>reduce the risk because you know, at the end of

0:26:42.400 --> 0:26:45.600
<v Speaker 5>the day, insurance is just actuary a. They compute the risk,

0:26:45.680 --> 0:26:47.960
<v Speaker 5>they add their profit and boom, you got it. So

0:26:48.040 --> 0:26:50.320
<v Speaker 5>we need to reduce risk, and we are leading into that.

0:26:50.400 --> 0:26:54.800
<v Speaker 5>We are doing fire risk mitigation. We're doing more proactive

0:26:54.960 --> 0:26:58.880
<v Speaker 5>and controlled burns. We've purchased several helicopters a fire HOWK

0:26:58.920 --> 0:27:01.520
<v Speaker 5>top of line helicopter, but all so several type two helicopters.

0:27:01.680 --> 0:27:04.199
<v Speaker 5>We used to rely on a shared air fleet with

0:27:04.280 --> 0:27:06.800
<v Speaker 5>neighboring states in the West. But what happens if there's

0:27:06.800 --> 0:27:09.160
<v Speaker 5>a fire in California, Arizona and Colorado at the same time,

0:27:09.160 --> 0:27:11.040
<v Speaker 5>we're not going to get that quick aerial response. So

0:27:11.080 --> 0:27:13.720
<v Speaker 5>we've made the decision to move towards having our own fleet.

0:27:13.920 --> 0:27:16.560
<v Speaker 5>We now do. It's continuing to grow. We want to

0:27:16.600 --> 0:27:19.080
<v Speaker 5>boom hit fires early when it matters, when we can

0:27:19.119 --> 0:27:21.360
<v Speaker 5>reduce them. That in the long run, of course, will

0:27:21.359 --> 0:27:25.080
<v Speaker 5>help equate to better actuarial tables and reduced insurance costs

0:27:25.080 --> 0:27:25.840
<v Speaker 5>for our homeowners.

0:27:25.960 --> 0:27:28.320
<v Speaker 1>Do you see stient typically that this kind of stuff

0:27:28.359 --> 0:27:31.800
<v Speaker 1>prevents larger fires. I'm talking about the control burns, the

0:27:32.160 --> 0:27:33.959
<v Speaker 1>kind of stuff you can do profilactively.

0:27:34.200 --> 0:27:37.840
<v Speaker 5>Absolutely, so community defence perimeters that would be your control burns,

0:27:37.880 --> 0:27:41.200
<v Speaker 5>taking down vegetation in and around communities. So to prevent

0:27:41.240 --> 0:27:43.280
<v Speaker 5>fires from jumping doesn't mean we're not going to fires.

0:27:43.280 --> 0:27:45.119
<v Speaker 5>We always have fire smalling coolera. It's always to be.

0:27:45.160 --> 0:27:47.520
<v Speaker 5>Fires are part of nature. The danger is when they

0:27:47.560 --> 0:27:52.240
<v Speaker 5>threaten human civilization, people's lives, and we absolutely significantly reduce

0:27:52.320 --> 0:27:55.640
<v Speaker 5>that with community defense perimeters and yes, home defense perimeters

0:27:55.680 --> 0:27:57.600
<v Speaker 5>where we're equipping homeowners with the ability to do that.

0:27:57.640 --> 0:28:01.320
<v Speaker 5>As an example, we recently remove the ability of hoa's

0:28:01.560 --> 0:28:04.919
<v Speaker 5>to prevent fire hardening. Many of them are requiring different things. Well,

0:28:04.960 --> 0:28:07.160
<v Speaker 5>let's call it wooden fences that are trees that were

0:28:07.160 --> 0:28:09.840
<v Speaker 5>actually bad for fires. We now empower homeowners to take

0:28:09.880 --> 0:28:14.240
<v Speaker 5>the steps necessary. But beyond that, community defense perimeters meeting

0:28:14.320 --> 0:28:16.520
<v Speaker 5>areas with no vegetation that can prevent the spread of

0:28:16.520 --> 0:28:19.959
<v Speaker 5>fire absolutely a critical tool, as well as rapid detection

0:28:20.040 --> 0:28:21.800
<v Speaker 5>and response, including aerial response.

0:28:22.000 --> 0:28:28.240
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so two questions now. One is I hate tariffs

0:28:28.480 --> 0:28:31.560
<v Speaker 1>good because I think they punish the consumer. Sounds like

0:28:31.640 --> 0:28:33.800
<v Speaker 1>you do too, So let's talk about that.

0:28:34.080 --> 0:28:35.840
<v Speaker 5>Well, you're on hundred percent right, wellly, I mean it's

0:28:35.920 --> 0:28:38.000
<v Speaker 5>rare to get an issue that like pretty much every

0:28:38.000 --> 0:28:41.040
<v Speaker 5>economists degrees on like left right, cent are like saris

0:28:41.040 --> 0:28:43.600
<v Speaker 5>are regressive, they punished the receiver. Brit is regressive being

0:28:43.640 --> 0:28:45.680
<v Speaker 5>they're kind of like a sales tax. They don't scale

0:28:45.720 --> 0:28:47.840
<v Speaker 5>with income, think about consumer products.

0:28:47.920 --> 0:28:49.280
<v Speaker 4>They are costly.

0:28:49.280 --> 0:28:52.320
<v Speaker 5>They drive inflation. Absolutely, one of my suggestions for reducing

0:28:52.320 --> 0:28:56.600
<v Speaker 5>inflation is dropping tariffs, entering, having more free trade agreements

0:28:56.640 --> 0:28:58.480
<v Speaker 5>with more countries, no question about it.

0:28:58.560 --> 0:29:00.280
<v Speaker 4>And I'm very critical of with.

0:29:00.200 --> 0:29:04.160
<v Speaker 5>Parties obviously, particularly Donald Trump, who champions and talents even

0:29:04.200 --> 0:29:05.760
<v Speaker 5>more tariffs than Joe Biden.

0:29:05.840 --> 0:29:06.920
<v Speaker 4>I encourage Joe Biden.

0:29:07.000 --> 0:29:09.440
<v Speaker 5>I hope he is the second term to lean into

0:29:09.680 --> 0:29:12.479
<v Speaker 5>trade agreements with Europe with our allies. Our Senator Bennett

0:29:12.480 --> 0:29:15.480
<v Speaker 5>has the America's Act expanding the Free Trade Zone uspectually

0:29:15.600 --> 0:29:18.480
<v Speaker 5>Canada to other countries. These would be great tangible measures,

0:29:18.640 --> 0:29:20.840
<v Speaker 5>good for the economy, good for the consumer, and they

0:29:20.880 --> 0:29:21.800
<v Speaker 5>would reduce inflation.

0:29:22.160 --> 0:29:24.880
<v Speaker 1>So you have an aibill. I spend a lot of

0:29:24.920 --> 0:29:27.680
<v Speaker 1>time reading Balwey media. I don't live in DC, but

0:29:27.960 --> 0:29:31.800
<v Speaker 1>I know that AI is sponsoring like almost everything right,

0:29:31.920 --> 0:29:35.160
<v Speaker 1>So clearly they are trying to get ahead of the

0:29:35.200 --> 0:29:38.120
<v Speaker 1>regulatory environment. I think it's interesting that you're doing this.

0:29:38.360 --> 0:29:41.360
<v Speaker 1>I think it's good explain to me how what you're

0:29:41.360 --> 0:29:43.280
<v Speaker 1>doing to regulate AI.

0:29:43.360 --> 0:29:45.000
<v Speaker 2>And also, can we.

0:29:45.040 --> 0:29:48.680
<v Speaker 1>Just for one second, the lack of regulation is how

0:29:49.200 --> 0:29:53.920
<v Speaker 1>tech companies basically drove out local news. So I just

0:29:54.000 --> 0:29:56.000
<v Speaker 1>am curious if you have thoughts on that too.

0:29:56.440 --> 0:29:59.240
<v Speaker 5>So I would say that our AI bill that I

0:29:59.280 --> 0:30:02.880
<v Speaker 5>signed a law. It deals with the potential discrimination of AI.

0:30:03.000 --> 0:30:06.080
<v Speaker 5>We also appeared deeply about privacy rights of AI. I

0:30:06.080 --> 0:30:09.960
<v Speaker 5>would say it's a conversation accelerator, meaning what needs to happen,

0:30:10.000 --> 0:30:13.360
<v Speaker 5>Molly frankly, is it needs to be done nationally because

0:30:13.440 --> 0:30:15.880
<v Speaker 5>I don't really support a system where there's fifty different

0:30:15.920 --> 0:30:17.120
<v Speaker 5>versions of two different states.

0:30:17.200 --> 0:30:18.720
<v Speaker 2>It's undoable, Yeah, go on.

0:30:18.840 --> 0:30:21.400
<v Speaker 5>It's undoable. But the way those things happen, Having served

0:30:21.400 --> 0:30:23.360
<v Speaker 5>in Congress, I've seen it is it takes a few

0:30:23.360 --> 0:30:25.680
<v Speaker 5>states to kind of mess around in this space and

0:30:25.680 --> 0:30:27.440
<v Speaker 5>then all of a sudden, you know, eight states, fifteen

0:30:27.480 --> 0:30:29.960
<v Speaker 5>states have done it, and then Congress wakes up and says,

0:30:30.160 --> 0:30:33.200
<v Speaker 5>we'd better figure this out. We better, you know, get

0:30:33.200 --> 0:30:35.040
<v Speaker 5>it reasonably right. And they can look at what the

0:30:35.080 --> 0:30:37.479
<v Speaker 5>EU's done, and they can look at other models and

0:30:37.520 --> 0:30:40.520
<v Speaker 5>create uniformity across the states. But I would say, what

0:30:40.520 --> 0:30:42.400
<v Speaker 5>what we're doing? You know, it doesn't take effect to

0:30:42.480 --> 0:30:44.960
<v Speaker 5>twenty six and hopefully it'll be you know, changed, or

0:30:44.960 --> 0:30:46.960
<v Speaker 5>Congress will take it up then. But it's a conversation

0:30:47.080 --> 0:30:50.680
<v Speaker 5>accelerator about how we approach AI and we should look

0:30:50.680 --> 0:30:53.280
<v Speaker 5>at it from a potential perspective of discrimination as well

0:30:53.320 --> 0:30:55.160
<v Speaker 5>as privacy rights and how it affects US.

0:30:55.280 --> 0:30:59.760
<v Speaker 1>California got a complicated legislative record in my mind, though

0:30:59.760 --> 0:31:01.600
<v Speaker 1>I like a lot of the stuff they do, though

0:31:01.640 --> 0:31:04.760
<v Speaker 1>sometimes I think they get ahead of themselves is trying

0:31:04.920 --> 0:31:09.480
<v Speaker 1>to do something that will regulate tech companies make them

0:31:09.600 --> 0:31:12.760
<v Speaker 1>pay for content. God forbid, anyone should pay for content.

0:31:12.960 --> 0:31:15.160
<v Speaker 1>It's a sort of tax. I don't know if you

0:31:15.200 --> 0:31:16.880
<v Speaker 1>know the No, I.

0:31:16.840 --> 0:31:19.000
<v Speaker 5>Don't, but I would just say something interesting about California.

0:31:19.080 --> 0:31:21.040
<v Speaker 5>So there is an alternative to Congress, because we all

0:31:21.080 --> 0:31:24.360
<v Speaker 5>know how notoriously slow they have been of late, right.

0:31:24.360 --> 0:31:28.000
<v Speaker 1>And how uninterested in tech regulation they are.

0:31:28.160 --> 0:31:30.840
<v Speaker 5>California can act and then other states can adopt something

0:31:30.880 --> 0:31:33.240
<v Speaker 5>similar to created the facto national standard. It could also

0:31:33.280 --> 0:31:35.040
<v Speaker 5>be Texas or New York, but a big state could

0:31:35.200 --> 0:31:37.240
<v Speaker 5>lead others. So I have a look at that. I'm

0:31:37.240 --> 0:31:39.320
<v Speaker 5>not talking about the tax or fiscal round there, Molly.

0:31:39.320 --> 0:31:41.360
<v Speaker 5>I'm talking about more of the regulatory realm. But we

0:31:41.440 --> 0:31:42.480
<v Speaker 5>have done a little bit of.

0:31:42.440 --> 0:31:43.280
<v Speaker 4>That around evs.

0:31:43.360 --> 0:31:46.120
<v Speaker 5>We haven't exactly imitated electric vehicles, that is, we haven't

0:31:46.240 --> 0:31:49.080
<v Speaker 5>imitated California, but because they've moved a certain way, it's

0:31:49.160 --> 0:31:51.680
<v Speaker 5>enabled us to move a certain way with manufacturers that

0:31:51.720 --> 0:31:52.880
<v Speaker 5>Colorado couldn't.

0:31:52.560 --> 0:31:53.080
<v Speaker 4>Do on our own.

0:31:53.080 --> 0:31:55.280
<v Speaker 5>Because we're, you know, tuber population of the country.

0:31:55.400 --> 0:31:57.680
<v Speaker 1>It does seem to me that the only way we're

0:31:57.720 --> 0:32:00.640
<v Speaker 1>going to get protection for local news, which well, in

0:32:00.760 --> 0:32:04.880
<v Speaker 1>the end cause us to have better information as citizens

0:32:05.040 --> 0:32:08.320
<v Speaker 1>and prevent us from ending up in an autocracy. Maybe

0:32:08.360 --> 0:32:10.480
<v Speaker 1>we won't do it this time, but we will do

0:32:10.560 --> 0:32:12.920
<v Speaker 1>it at some point. If we don't, if our citizens

0:32:13.000 --> 0:32:16.920
<v Speaker 1>can't read the truth, could be on the state level. Right.

0:32:17.160 --> 0:32:19.240
<v Speaker 5>Well, you know, I want to see where you're going

0:32:19.280 --> 0:32:22.520
<v Speaker 5>with this, Molly. It's obviously very dangerous for government to

0:32:22.880 --> 0:32:25.320
<v Speaker 5>mess with the press and freedom of the press in

0:32:25.320 --> 0:32:28.280
<v Speaker 5>any shape or form, like favoring certain lids or investing

0:32:28.400 --> 0:32:29.520
<v Speaker 5>or But I'm more.

0:32:29.480 --> 0:32:32.760
<v Speaker 1>Just saying that the idea that tech companies should have

0:32:32.840 --> 0:32:37.000
<v Speaker 1>to be responsible for either what is put on their

0:32:37.040 --> 0:32:40.520
<v Speaker 1>platform or have to pay for the content that they use.

0:32:40.760 --> 0:32:43.840
<v Speaker 5>Well, look, our major media companies are also tech companies, Mollie, Right,

0:32:43.920 --> 0:32:46.160
<v Speaker 5>So I mean there's a blurring to a certain extent.

0:32:46.280 --> 0:32:49.440
<v Speaker 5>We have a great local press in Colorado, a nonprofit

0:32:49.480 --> 0:32:54.800
<v Speaker 5>called Colorado Sun, Independent, nonprofit, new model. We obviously, unfortunately

0:32:54.840 --> 0:32:57.080
<v Speaker 5>many of our newspapers are owned by hedge funds. They

0:32:57.120 --> 0:32:59.000
<v Speaker 5>have been gutted. That's not a good thing. We still

0:32:59.040 --> 0:33:02.240
<v Speaker 5>have fairly vibrant local television news. But I'm particularly proud

0:33:02.240 --> 0:33:04.800
<v Speaker 5>of these new models like Colorado Sun that have created

0:33:04.840 --> 0:33:07.600
<v Speaker 5>a nonprofit content generation model. I hope that occurs in

0:33:07.640 --> 0:33:08.800
<v Speaker 5>more cities and states.

0:33:09.200 --> 0:33:12.720
<v Speaker 1>So interesting, you still have half a term left, but

0:33:12.880 --> 0:33:15.040
<v Speaker 1>you've been governor of Colorado for a while. What have

0:33:15.120 --> 0:33:15.800
<v Speaker 1>you learned?

0:33:16.120 --> 0:33:18.960
<v Speaker 5>Well, a lot. I came from two different backgrounds, I

0:33:18.960 --> 0:33:21.040
<v Speaker 5>guess through three it away, so as private sector started,

0:33:21.080 --> 0:33:24.400
<v Speaker 5>several businesses started, a couple of charter schools, social entrepreneur,

0:33:24.440 --> 0:33:25.840
<v Speaker 5>and then I was in Congress for ten years. So

0:33:25.880 --> 0:33:28.240
<v Speaker 5>this is obviously the most exciting, fastest paced job I've

0:33:28.280 --> 0:33:30.320
<v Speaker 5>ever had, for sure. And you're really able to get

0:33:30.360 --> 0:33:32.600
<v Speaker 5>things done, unlike in Congress where you might have to work,

0:33:32.640 --> 0:33:34.840
<v Speaker 5>you know, six seven, eight years to finally get one

0:33:34.880 --> 0:33:38.160
<v Speaker 5>amendment into something that becomes law in your area of jurisdiction.

0:33:38.600 --> 0:33:40.400
<v Speaker 4>We pumped stuff out quickly.

0:33:40.400 --> 0:33:43.160
<v Speaker 5>We got universal preschool in kindergarten in the state one

0:33:43.200 --> 0:33:46.240
<v Speaker 5>of Michaels as governor. We've cut the income tax. We've

0:33:46.280 --> 0:33:48.560
<v Speaker 5>done a number of savings around healthcare to bring down

0:33:48.560 --> 0:33:50.960
<v Speaker 5>people's costs, especially in the healthcare exchange for those who

0:33:50.960 --> 0:33:53.480
<v Speaker 5>don't get it from work. We've protected the environment. We've

0:33:53.480 --> 0:33:56.760
<v Speaker 5>provided you know, rebates to accelerate electric vehicle adoption and

0:33:57.040 --> 0:33:59.000
<v Speaker 5>so many things. Just boom boom, boom, boom boom. It's

0:33:59.040 --> 0:34:01.160
<v Speaker 5>an exciting job. But of course we yes, we also

0:34:01.200 --> 0:34:04.120
<v Speaker 5>deal with crisis is, fires, floods, pandemic, you name it.

0:34:04.160 --> 0:34:06.920
<v Speaker 5>But despite that, it's fun to be proactive and get

0:34:06.960 --> 0:34:08.040
<v Speaker 5>a lot done at the state level.

0:34:08.200 --> 0:34:09.759
<v Speaker 2>Thank you, Governor, Thank you.

0:34:09.840 --> 0:34:15.480
<v Speaker 6>Molly ari Berman is a reporter at Mother Jones and

0:34:15.560 --> 0:34:20.000
<v Speaker 6>the author of Minority Rule, The Right Wings Attack on

0:34:20.080 --> 0:34:23.399
<v Speaker 6>the Will of the People and the Fight to Resist It.

0:34:24.120 --> 0:34:26.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Fast Politics.

0:34:26.320 --> 0:34:29.239
<v Speaker 4>Ari Berman, Hey Molly, so great to be here. Thank you.

0:34:29.480 --> 0:34:33.400
<v Speaker 1>So Minority Rule, The right Wing Attack on the Will

0:34:33.520 --> 0:34:35.799
<v Speaker 1>of the People and the Fight to resist it.

0:34:36.040 --> 0:34:38.520
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it's like every fucking day.

0:34:38.760 --> 0:34:43.000
<v Speaker 1>Go tell us, tell us why we shouldn't just kill ourselves?

0:34:43.040 --> 0:34:44.520
<v Speaker 2>No, no, tell us about this book.

0:34:44.600 --> 0:34:46.560
<v Speaker 4>Well, good to know we can swear on the podcast.

0:34:46.600 --> 0:34:50.720
<v Speaker 4>That's always a possi right baby, especially when discussing this topic.

0:34:50.960 --> 0:34:53.359
<v Speaker 4>So you know, I've been reporting on the issue of

0:34:53.520 --> 0:34:56.440
<v Speaker 4>voting rights for over a decade now, and as I

0:34:56.560 --> 0:34:59.680
<v Speaker 4>got deeper into reporting on voter suppression, I began asking

0:34:59.719 --> 0:35:03.480
<v Speaker 4>my self, why is the Republican Party doing this so aggressively?

0:35:03.920 --> 0:35:06.360
<v Speaker 4>Is it just to try to get an electoral advantage

0:35:06.680 --> 0:35:09.600
<v Speaker 4>or is there some larger purpose here? And what I

0:35:09.719 --> 0:35:13.759
<v Speaker 4>concluded is that the larger purpose here is minority rule.

0:35:13.719 --> 0:35:16.560
<v Speaker 2>Right, is to get the electoral advantage.

0:35:16.239 --> 0:35:20.759
<v Speaker 4>Exactly, so they can have a minority of the population

0:35:20.960 --> 0:35:24.040
<v Speaker 4>but a majority of the power, which basically goes directly

0:35:24.080 --> 0:35:26.960
<v Speaker 4>against the idea of the consent of the governed that

0:35:27.000 --> 0:35:29.120
<v Speaker 4>democracy is based on the consent of the government has

0:35:29.160 --> 0:35:31.440
<v Speaker 4>laid out in the Declaration of Independence. So what I

0:35:31.480 --> 0:35:33.960
<v Speaker 4>did is basically two things. I traced it all the

0:35:33.960 --> 0:35:36.640
<v Speaker 4>way back to the founding fathers to show that there's

0:35:36.680 --> 0:35:39.480
<v Speaker 4>always been these anti democratic strains in the country. But

0:35:39.520 --> 0:35:42.920
<v Speaker 4>then there's essentially this new anti democratic movement layered on

0:35:42.960 --> 0:35:46.359
<v Speaker 4>top of it, which is voter suppression, gerrymandering, dark money,

0:35:46.400 --> 0:35:48.600
<v Speaker 4>all the things that Republicans are doing now. So we

0:35:48.680 --> 0:35:53.000
<v Speaker 4>kind of have this historical minority rule embedded in the system,

0:35:53.040 --> 0:35:55.640
<v Speaker 4>but it's gotten worse because the Republican Party has so

0:35:55.680 --> 0:35:58.640
<v Speaker 4>aggressively radicalized against democracy.

0:35:58.640 --> 0:36:03.400
<v Speaker 1>Right, and that is the Republican Party radicalizing against democracy.

0:36:03.920 --> 0:36:06.800
<v Speaker 1>I want to just do two seconds on that, because

0:36:07.080 --> 0:36:11.440
<v Speaker 1>you're a voting right sky among other things, so Republicans

0:36:11.480 --> 0:36:15.640
<v Speaker 1>have wanted to make it so people who are not

0:36:15.760 --> 0:36:20.600
<v Speaker 1>white can't vote for a long time. But what's happened

0:36:20.800 --> 0:36:24.600
<v Speaker 1>now is I think it's kicked into high gear in

0:36:24.640 --> 0:36:25.239
<v Speaker 1>a different way.

0:36:25.360 --> 0:36:28.520
<v Speaker 4>Discuss exactly I think that's true. So, I mean, you

0:36:28.520 --> 0:36:30.720
<v Speaker 4>can go back a long time, and I do trace

0:36:30.719 --> 0:36:33.200
<v Speaker 4>it a long time in the book about Republicans saying

0:36:33.239 --> 0:36:35.239
<v Speaker 4>that black people shouldn't vote. I mean they said it

0:36:35.320 --> 0:36:37.919
<v Speaker 4>during Jim Crow, they said it after the Voting Rights Act.

0:36:38.360 --> 0:36:39.920
<v Speaker 4>It goes back a long way.

0:36:39.960 --> 0:36:42.800
<v Speaker 2>Long and story tradition of racism, big.

0:36:42.600 --> 0:36:46.240
<v Speaker 4>Part of Nixon's Southern strategy, big part of Reagan courting

0:36:46.320 --> 0:36:48.680
<v Speaker 4>white voters. But what I argue is it obviously got

0:36:48.719 --> 0:36:51.480
<v Speaker 4>worse after the election of the first black president, which

0:36:51.560 --> 0:36:53.960
<v Speaker 4>sort of crystallized the fears they had about the changing

0:36:54.040 --> 0:36:56.560
<v Speaker 4>nature of the country. And so in the kind of

0:36:56.719 --> 0:37:00.960
<v Speaker 4>modern incarnation of GOP voter suppression that the point is

0:37:01.040 --> 0:37:03.600
<v Speaker 4>after the twenty ten election, when Republicans get control of

0:37:03.600 --> 0:37:07.280
<v Speaker 4>all those key swing states like Wisconsin and North Carolina

0:37:07.320 --> 0:37:10.200
<v Speaker 4>and Ohio and Florida, and they start making it harder

0:37:10.200 --> 0:37:12.839
<v Speaker 4>to vote, to try to manufacture an electorate that will

0:37:12.880 --> 0:37:16.160
<v Speaker 4>be older, wider, more conservative as opposed to younger, more diverse,

0:37:16.200 --> 0:37:19.120
<v Speaker 4>more progressive that I think, in many ways lays the

0:37:19.160 --> 0:37:22.920
<v Speaker 4>groundwork for Trump, because the radicalization of the Republican Party

0:37:22.960 --> 0:37:26.200
<v Speaker 4>happens before Trump, and then it creates an opening for Trump,

0:37:26.239 --> 0:37:29.200
<v Speaker 4>and then you start to see voter suppression get much

0:37:29.239 --> 0:37:32.160
<v Speaker 4>worse under Trump. First he makes all these false claims

0:37:32.160 --> 0:37:34.400
<v Speaker 4>about stolen elections, and then he actually tries to overturt

0:37:34.400 --> 0:37:37.200
<v Speaker 4>the election and incis and insurrection, and then it's basically

0:37:37.280 --> 0:37:39.359
<v Speaker 4>voter suppression on steroids. They're not just trying to make

0:37:39.360 --> 0:37:41.600
<v Speaker 4>it harder to vote on the front end, they're actually

0:37:41.640 --> 0:37:44.440
<v Speaker 4>literally trying to overturn votes on the back end as well.

0:37:44.480 --> 0:37:47.040
<v Speaker 4>And that's the scary thing that's happening today is we

0:37:47.120 --> 0:37:49.560
<v Speaker 4>have not just laws making it harder to vote, but

0:37:49.600 --> 0:37:52.920
<v Speaker 4>we essentially have a Republican party in which the Big

0:37:53.000 --> 0:37:56.640
<v Speaker 4>Lie is now the central organizing principle of Trump's Republican Party.

0:37:56.960 --> 0:38:01.160
<v Speaker 1>So what I think is interesting besides the fact that

0:38:01.280 --> 0:38:04.440
<v Speaker 1>these sentence the big Lie is the central organizing of

0:38:04.680 --> 0:38:07.520
<v Speaker 1>Trump's Republican Party, which I think is right and also

0:38:07.640 --> 0:38:12.000
<v Speaker 1>makes me so incredibly depressed about the state of democracy,

0:38:12.040 --> 0:38:15.640
<v Speaker 1>and also the intelligence of Republicans. What I think is

0:38:15.760 --> 0:38:18.520
<v Speaker 1>interesting is that Republicans, and I want you to sort

0:38:18.560 --> 0:38:20.400
<v Speaker 1>of talk us through this because I think this is

0:38:20.480 --> 0:38:22.719
<v Speaker 1>like they've gotten themselves an interesting place here.

0:38:22.840 --> 0:38:24.120
<v Speaker 2>There's a lot of new polling.

0:38:24.440 --> 0:38:27.400
<v Speaker 1>I think polls are bullshit, especially these polls, because I

0:38:27.480 --> 0:38:30.640
<v Speaker 1>just think they're hinky and I'm a cross tabs truther.

0:38:31.000 --> 0:38:33.920
<v Speaker 1>But I want you to talk about this. Republicans are

0:38:34.080 --> 0:38:37.799
<v Speaker 1>very excited about the possibility that they could win over

0:38:37.880 --> 0:38:40.920
<v Speaker 1>black and Latino voters. Now, I think this is very

0:38:40.960 --> 0:38:44.520
<v Speaker 1>overstated in the polls. But if they are trying to

0:38:44.560 --> 0:38:47.520
<v Speaker 1>do this, isn't everything they do to keep these people

0:38:47.600 --> 0:38:49.040
<v Speaker 1>who they are trying.

0:38:48.719 --> 0:38:50.080
<v Speaker 2>To win now from voting.

0:38:50.400 --> 0:38:53.040
<v Speaker 4>Well, that's what's interesting is you've already heard the Republican

0:38:53.080 --> 0:38:55.160
<v Speaker 4>Party start changing there too. And I just heard Trump

0:38:55.239 --> 0:38:57.479
<v Speaker 4>said that people should vote early and vote by mail,

0:38:57.520 --> 0:39:02.160
<v Speaker 4>which well directly at odds with his message for many years.

0:39:02.160 --> 0:39:04.600
<v Speaker 4>I mean, I'm conflicted about the polling because I think,

0:39:04.840 --> 0:39:07.080
<v Speaker 4>first off, i think it's still the case that white

0:39:07.160 --> 0:39:09.880
<v Speaker 4>voters are the key part of the Republican Party and

0:39:09.920 --> 0:39:12.200
<v Speaker 4>certainly the key part of the Republican base. So let's

0:39:12.239 --> 0:39:15.160
<v Speaker 4>not fool ourselves that the Republican Party has undergone a

0:39:15.200 --> 0:39:18.040
<v Speaker 4>full Rainbow Coalition make over. I think it's still if

0:39:18.040 --> 0:39:19.920
<v Speaker 4>you went to most Republican meetings, I think you're going

0:39:19.960 --> 0:39:22.600
<v Speaker 4>to see a lot of white faces there, and certainly

0:39:22.600 --> 0:39:24.759
<v Speaker 4>that's where the energy is on the base. Secondly, I'm

0:39:24.800 --> 0:39:26.759
<v Speaker 4>not sure how much this is about the Democratic Party

0:39:26.840 --> 0:39:30.080
<v Speaker 4>or Biden per se. We didn't see in twenty twenty

0:39:30.080 --> 0:39:33.760
<v Speaker 4>two the Democratic Party have these fundamental problems with voters

0:39:33.800 --> 0:39:37.120
<v Speaker 4>of color, or young voters for that matter. My sense

0:39:37.200 --> 0:39:39.800
<v Speaker 4>is if Gretchen Whitmer, for example, the governor of Michigan

0:39:39.840 --> 0:39:42.760
<v Speaker 4>where the nominee, she would not be losing young voters

0:39:42.840 --> 0:39:44.879
<v Speaker 4>or voters of color. So I think some of this

0:39:44.920 --> 0:39:47.719
<v Speaker 4>is Biden centric to the extent it exists. But I

0:39:47.760 --> 0:39:50.640
<v Speaker 4>think the basic thesis that I have of that the

0:39:50.719 --> 0:39:54.000
<v Speaker 4>Republican Party is a largely white party that's concerned about

0:39:54.000 --> 0:39:57.759
<v Speaker 4>the changing demographics of the country is still true regardless

0:39:57.800 --> 0:40:00.799
<v Speaker 4>of whether there's some blips in the polling. That is

0:40:00.920 --> 0:40:03.120
<v Speaker 4>I think more specific to Biden than it is about

0:40:03.200 --> 0:40:05.960
<v Speaker 4>kind of long term trends in American politics.

0:40:06.040 --> 0:40:10.120
<v Speaker 1>They put themselves in a fascinating situation here, but even still,

0:40:10.200 --> 0:40:14.360
<v Speaker 1>like if they are losing white college educated voters, which

0:40:14.640 --> 0:40:17.480
<v Speaker 1>if these polls are right, which again I don't necessarily

0:40:17.520 --> 0:40:20.360
<v Speaker 1>think they are, they show a real racial realignment for

0:40:20.520 --> 0:40:23.920
<v Speaker 1>working class you know, not necessarily black, but Hispanic voters

0:40:24.000 --> 0:40:29.200
<v Speaker 1>going more Republican, and then affluent college educated voters, like

0:40:29.280 --> 0:40:33.840
<v Speaker 1>these suburban Republicans all becoming Democrats. They would have completely

0:40:33.920 --> 0:40:38.000
<v Speaker 1>fucked themselves. I'm just saying, again, we don't know. It's theoretical.

0:40:38.200 --> 0:40:41.520
<v Speaker 4>There is a realignment going on, certainly among white voters, right,

0:40:42.680 --> 0:40:46.920
<v Speaker 4>kind of the kind of classic suburban country club white Republicans,

0:40:46.960 --> 0:40:48.920
<v Speaker 4>many of them are now never Trumpers.

0:40:48.520 --> 0:40:50.520
<v Speaker 2>Ordem which is fascinating.

0:40:50.920 --> 0:40:52.800
<v Speaker 4>You know, a lot of the Lincoln Project folks, of

0:40:52.800 --> 0:40:54.840
<v Speaker 4>those kind of people, and that then you have, you

0:40:54.840 --> 0:40:56.640
<v Speaker 4>know a lot of the working class whites that were

0:40:56.640 --> 0:40:58.239
<v Speaker 4>the core of the Democratic Party in a lot of

0:40:58.239 --> 0:41:01.840
<v Speaker 4>places for many years they now abandoned the Democratic Party.

0:41:01.880 --> 0:41:04.520
<v Speaker 4>And so I think there's this realignment, and I think,

0:41:04.719 --> 0:41:06.960
<v Speaker 4>you know, I think you can't make any kind of

0:41:07.080 --> 0:41:10.520
<v Speaker 4>sweeping predictions. That's why every time there's these books about

0:41:10.520 --> 0:41:13.640
<v Speaker 4>like emerging Democratic majorities emerging, they always go out of

0:41:13.680 --> 0:41:16.080
<v Speaker 4>date really quickly. But I think, you know, there's a

0:41:16.239 --> 0:41:20.319
<v Speaker 4>pretty consistent through line for many, many years of the

0:41:20.320 --> 0:41:23.799
<v Speaker 4>Republican Party relying on reactionary wheys. I mean, that's a

0:41:23.800 --> 0:41:27.600
<v Speaker 4>pretty solid through line that predates this election, you know.

0:41:27.680 --> 0:41:29.719
<v Speaker 4>I mean, and I trace it. I trace it a

0:41:29.719 --> 0:41:31.480
<v Speaker 4>long way. I mean, you can go back before there

0:41:31.480 --> 0:41:33.279
<v Speaker 4>were Democrats and Republicans, you can go back to the

0:41:33.280 --> 0:41:37.040
<v Speaker 4>founding fathers, and basically they're trying to protect elite white

0:41:37.080 --> 0:41:40.479
<v Speaker 4>power before there were political parties. And then, certainly that's

0:41:40.480 --> 0:41:42.600
<v Speaker 4>been a theme of the Republican Party since the Civil

0:41:42.680 --> 0:41:44.359
<v Speaker 4>Rights movement, and I think even more of a theme

0:41:44.400 --> 0:41:46.879
<v Speaker 4>of the Republican Party under Donald Trump.

0:41:46.760 --> 0:41:47.720
<v Speaker 2>For sure. For sure.

0:41:47.960 --> 0:41:51.920
<v Speaker 1>Now let's talk about where we are right now with

0:41:52.120 --> 0:41:56.920
<v Speaker 1>this Republican Party and also just what they're doing to

0:41:56.920 --> 0:41:59.640
<v Speaker 1>make it harder to vote, and our Democrats sort of

0:41:59.719 --> 0:42:01.640
<v Speaker 1>add quickly addressing that or now.

0:42:01.880 --> 0:42:04.720
<v Speaker 4>So, I mean, there's a few things they're doing. First off,

0:42:04.920 --> 0:42:08.319
<v Speaker 4>they changed in most Republican controlled states, changed the voting

0:42:08.400 --> 0:42:11.080
<v Speaker 4>laws in some way or another after the twenty twenty election.

0:42:11.200 --> 0:42:14.560
<v Speaker 4>So this was how they kind of weaponized the insurrection.

0:42:14.800 --> 0:42:17.719
<v Speaker 4>I called it the insurrection through other means because Trump

0:42:17.760 --> 0:42:19.640
<v Speaker 4>fails to overturn the vote. But then in Georgia and

0:42:19.640 --> 0:42:22.359
<v Speaker 4>all these states they changed the voting laws, and you know,

0:42:22.840 --> 0:42:25.000
<v Speaker 4>maybe they were fighting the last war, because a lot

0:42:25.040 --> 0:42:26.719
<v Speaker 4>of this went after mail voting, and we'll see how

0:42:26.760 --> 0:42:29.080
<v Speaker 4>many people actually vote by mail in the next election.

0:42:29.200 --> 0:42:31.800
<v Speaker 4>But certainly the laws have changed in meaningful ways in

0:42:31.840 --> 0:42:34.600
<v Speaker 4>a number of swing states. Then of course they've doubled

0:42:34.600 --> 0:42:38.400
<v Speaker 4>down on election sub version, so trying to contest election outcomes.

0:42:38.440 --> 0:42:42.680
<v Speaker 4>And we've seen local Republican Party officials, for example, fail

0:42:42.760 --> 0:42:47.480
<v Speaker 4>to certify elections, and we've seen that basically Republicans who

0:42:47.719 --> 0:42:50.760
<v Speaker 4>have said that the Republican Party should stop contesting elections

0:42:50.840 --> 0:42:54.279
<v Speaker 4>essentially get purged from the RNC. You know, Trump won't

0:42:54.360 --> 0:42:57.799
<v Speaker 4>hire anyone who says that the election wasn't stolen, which

0:42:57.840 --> 0:43:01.280
<v Speaker 4>leads you to believe that they're preparing for a more organized,

0:43:01.360 --> 0:43:03.960
<v Speaker 4>better funded effort to try to steal the election in

0:43:04.000 --> 0:43:06.080
<v Speaker 4>twenty twenty four, if it comes to that, because I

0:43:06.080 --> 0:43:08.760
<v Speaker 4>think there really was no election denier movement in twenty

0:43:08.800 --> 0:43:10.759
<v Speaker 4>twenty As you know, Molly, this was totally seated. Their

0:43:10.800 --> 0:43:13.480
<v Speaker 4>pass This was you know, the hair dye tripping down

0:43:13.600 --> 0:43:19.080
<v Speaker 4>Rudy Juliani's base. Four seasons total landscaping kind of election denial,

0:43:19.120 --> 0:43:23.240
<v Speaker 4>and now this is central to the RNC, it's central

0:43:23.280 --> 0:43:26.360
<v Speaker 4>to Republicans all across the country that they have a

0:43:26.440 --> 0:43:29.319
<v Speaker 4>much more organized, well funded movement that's bought into this.

0:43:29.400 --> 0:43:32.160
<v Speaker 4>And so I think if the election outcome is close,

0:43:32.400 --> 0:43:36.279
<v Speaker 4>I think we can expect very very aggressive challenges to

0:43:36.320 --> 0:43:39.239
<v Speaker 4>it in twenty twenty four, in addition to the laws

0:43:39.239 --> 0:43:40.759
<v Speaker 4>that they're passing to try to make it harder to

0:43:40.840 --> 0:43:44.200
<v Speaker 4>vote on the front end. What makes you hopeful, Well,

0:43:44.239 --> 0:43:46.160
<v Speaker 4>a few things, I think. First off, there's a lot

0:43:46.160 --> 0:43:49.760
<v Speaker 4>of really interesting organizing happening at the state and local

0:43:49.880 --> 0:43:51.880
<v Speaker 4>level right now. A key part of the end of

0:43:51.920 --> 0:43:53.480
<v Speaker 4>my book is about Michigan, and I had a New

0:43:53.560 --> 0:43:56.880
<v Speaker 4>York Times op ed about this, But basically, Michigan is

0:43:56.880 --> 0:43:59.120
<v Speaker 4>one of those states that was seemingly rigged. After the

0:43:59.160 --> 0:44:02.880
<v Speaker 4>twenty ten election. Republicans routinely got a minority of votes

0:44:02.880 --> 0:44:05.560
<v Speaker 4>but controlled the state legislature for a decade and a half.

0:44:05.600 --> 0:44:08.959
<v Speaker 4>And then what everyday activist did is they started putting

0:44:09.000 --> 0:44:11.560
<v Speaker 4>initiatives on the ballot to try to make the democratic

0:44:11.680 --> 0:44:15.920
<v Speaker 4>process more fair. They passed a ban on partison jerrymandering,

0:44:15.960 --> 0:44:19.480
<v Speaker 4>They dramatically expanded voting rights through things like automatic and

0:44:19.520 --> 0:44:22.520
<v Speaker 4>election day registration. They put on ballot initiatives that enshrine

0:44:22.520 --> 0:44:25.600
<v Speaker 4>the right to abortion rights. So they use direct democracy

0:44:25.640 --> 0:44:29.240
<v Speaker 4>to expand voting rights. And that's something that has happened

0:44:29.320 --> 0:44:31.319
<v Speaker 4>in a number of places. And then there's also other

0:44:31.400 --> 0:44:34.719
<v Speaker 4>places where people have changed in terms of Democrats have

0:44:34.760 --> 0:44:37.560
<v Speaker 4>focused more on local elections. Wisconsin, for example, there's a

0:44:37.560 --> 0:44:40.759
<v Speaker 4>progressive majority on the state Supreme Court that's struck down

0:44:40.960 --> 0:44:44.239
<v Speaker 4>jerrymandering there so that those heavily gerrymanded maps are no

0:44:44.320 --> 0:44:46.680
<v Speaker 4>longer in place. So if you look at the state

0:44:46.840 --> 0:44:50.120
<v Speaker 4>landscape and the battleground states, it's a lot more fair

0:44:50.440 --> 0:44:54.160
<v Speaker 4>than it was in twenty twenty. There is more democratic governors,

0:44:54.360 --> 0:44:58.719
<v Speaker 4>there is more democratic state legislatures, there's more democratic secretaries

0:44:58.760 --> 0:45:00.960
<v Speaker 4>of state, attorney general. And I have to say that

0:45:01.000 --> 0:45:03.280
<v Speaker 4>every Democrat is going to be good on democracy issues,

0:45:03.440 --> 0:45:05.719
<v Speaker 4>but these are people that ran on these issues that

0:45:05.840 --> 0:45:07.719
<v Speaker 4>made it a central part. So I think, you know,

0:45:07.800 --> 0:45:09.960
<v Speaker 4>if Trump would try to contest the election in the

0:45:10.000 --> 0:45:14.440
<v Speaker 4>place like Michigan or a place like Pennsylvania or Wisconsin,

0:45:14.640 --> 0:45:17.200
<v Speaker 4>you have a much tougher time doing it in twenty

0:45:17.239 --> 0:45:19.600
<v Speaker 4>twenty four than in twenty twenty. And so in that sense,

0:45:19.640 --> 0:45:22.000
<v Speaker 4>I think the system has been trump proofed a lot

0:45:22.120 --> 0:45:23.600
<v Speaker 4>compared to how it was last time.

0:45:23.760 --> 0:45:27.399
<v Speaker 1>But it's also true that if you have democratic governors,

0:45:27.920 --> 0:45:30.640
<v Speaker 1>there's less chance to cheat, right there.

0:45:30.520 --> 0:45:33.040
<v Speaker 4>Is, Yeah, exactly because a lot of those places, democratic

0:45:33.080 --> 0:45:35.759
<v Speaker 4>governors are in charge of certifying the election, right so,

0:45:36.160 --> 0:45:41.400
<v Speaker 4>democratic governor in Pennsylvania, Democratic governor Michigan, Democratic governor in Arizona,

0:45:41.480 --> 0:45:44.040
<v Speaker 4>Democratic governor Wisconsin. That means that they're going to have

0:45:44.160 --> 0:45:47.480
<v Speaker 4>a major say in certifying the election results, which means

0:45:47.640 --> 0:45:49.399
<v Speaker 4>it's harder to cheat. It's also harder to pass laws

0:45:49.440 --> 0:45:51.000
<v Speaker 4>that make it harder to vote in the first place

0:45:51.040 --> 0:45:53.120
<v Speaker 4>as well. And you know, in some of these places

0:45:53.120 --> 0:45:55.360
<v Speaker 4>there's a stalemate, right like in Wisconsin, where there's a

0:45:55.400 --> 0:45:58.000
<v Speaker 4>Republican legislature and a Democratic governor, they haven't really been

0:45:58.040 --> 0:46:00.520
<v Speaker 4>able to do much of anything, but it prevents bad

0:46:00.560 --> 0:46:03.080
<v Speaker 4>things from happening. And then in places like Michigan, they've

0:46:03.080 --> 0:46:05.160
<v Speaker 4>been able to do a lot of really proactive things.

0:46:05.320 --> 0:46:07.480
<v Speaker 4>And so basically what I'm saying is, I do think

0:46:07.520 --> 0:46:10.520
<v Speaker 4>we need a long term movement for institutional reform on

0:46:10.560 --> 0:46:13.840
<v Speaker 4>the federal level to reform the Supreme Court to reform

0:46:13.880 --> 0:46:17.319
<v Speaker 4>the US setate, to break some of these to break

0:46:17.400 --> 0:46:19.600
<v Speaker 4>up some of these broken structures. But I also think

0:46:19.680 --> 0:46:22.400
<v Speaker 4>that changing the state and local level happens a lot quicker.

0:46:22.640 --> 0:46:24.680
<v Speaker 4>And even if you live in a blue state Molly

0:46:24.760 --> 0:46:27.279
<v Speaker 4>like we do, there's a lot of swing districts in

0:46:27.360 --> 0:46:27.840
<v Speaker 4>New York.

0:46:27.960 --> 0:46:31.520
<v Speaker 2>So I'm aware that's why Democrats lost the House.

0:46:32.000 --> 0:46:34.239
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, exactly, they lost the House because of California and

0:46:34.280 --> 0:46:36.000
<v Speaker 4>New York. And I always hear people in New York say,

0:46:36.040 --> 0:46:38.200
<v Speaker 4>I'm going to Georgia, I'm going to Wisconsin, and I'm like,

0:46:38.400 --> 0:46:39.840
<v Speaker 4>you could just go to Staten Island.

0:46:40.040 --> 0:46:42.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well don't go to Stutson Valley, but you could.

0:46:42.360 --> 0:46:45.200
<v Speaker 4>Go to Long Island exactly. You could flip the House there.

0:46:45.400 --> 0:46:47.359
<v Speaker 4>And so I mean, I think people need to think

0:46:47.400 --> 0:46:49.280
<v Speaker 4>more about organizing locally in general.

0:46:49.440 --> 0:46:50.839
<v Speaker 2>And I think that's a really good point.

0:46:50.880 --> 0:46:54.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the federal staff, I hesitate to say that

0:46:54.520 --> 0:46:59.560
<v Speaker 1>this Supreme Court has done something that isn't completely beyond

0:46:59.600 --> 0:47:03.120
<v Speaker 1>the pay. Explain to us what's happening in this congressional

0:47:03.239 --> 0:47:06.279
<v Speaker 1>district in the Great State of Louisiana.

0:47:06.440 --> 0:47:09.239
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so this is a complicated case, but basically the

0:47:09.239 --> 0:47:12.000
<v Speaker 4>good news is that the Supreme Court ruled that Louisiana

0:47:12.160 --> 0:47:14.839
<v Speaker 4>has to use a congressional map for twenty twenty four

0:47:14.880 --> 0:47:18.880
<v Speaker 4>that includes two majority black congressional district Are you shocked.

0:47:19.080 --> 0:47:21.960
<v Speaker 4>I'm not shocked, only because the state of Louisiana took

0:47:22.000 --> 0:47:24.839
<v Speaker 4>this position. So I mean, like, black voters in Louisiana

0:47:24.880 --> 0:47:27.800
<v Speaker 4>are on the same side, which is very rare. The

0:47:27.840 --> 0:47:31.600
<v Speaker 4>state of Louisiana was forced into drawing a second black

0:47:31.880 --> 0:47:35.320
<v Speaker 4>congressional district, which is expected to elect a Democrat because

0:47:35.360 --> 0:47:37.839
<v Speaker 4>of lower federal court decisions. Now, what the Supreme Court

0:47:37.880 --> 0:47:40.840
<v Speaker 4>has done is it is upheld those lower court decisions

0:47:40.880 --> 0:47:44.520
<v Speaker 4>and that has been a rare bright spot for voting rights.

0:47:44.520 --> 0:47:47.080
<v Speaker 4>And that they did this not just in Louisiana. They

0:47:47.120 --> 0:47:49.920
<v Speaker 4>did it in Alabama too, which was very surprising. Now

0:47:49.960 --> 0:47:52.239
<v Speaker 4>we'll see how long this lasts to the sense that

0:47:52.239 --> 0:47:54.120
<v Speaker 4>there is support for voting rights in the court. It's

0:47:54.160 --> 0:47:58.439
<v Speaker 4>very tenuous. It takes five justices, obviously one of them

0:47:58.640 --> 0:48:00.560
<v Speaker 4>who is in the majority in the Alley Bama case,

0:48:00.600 --> 0:48:03.640
<v Speaker 4>Brett Kavana, also already said he's open to challenging the

0:48:03.680 --> 0:48:06.919
<v Speaker 4>constutionality of the remaining parts of the voting Rights Act.

0:48:07.000 --> 0:48:09.319
<v Speaker 4>So I'm not popping too much champagne here, but I

0:48:09.360 --> 0:48:11.279
<v Speaker 4>do think like, given this is a six to three

0:48:11.280 --> 0:48:13.759
<v Speaker 4>conservative supermajority on the Supreme Court, so anytime they don't

0:48:13.760 --> 0:48:16.480
<v Speaker 4>do something terrible, you have to celebrate it, at least momentarily.

0:48:16.880 --> 0:48:19.120
<v Speaker 2>Yes, how did they break Well, this is.

0:48:19.040 --> 0:48:22.600
<v Speaker 4>The interesting thing. It broke six to three, which normally

0:48:22.800 --> 0:48:26.080
<v Speaker 4>six conservatives and three liberals assenting. Normally, you would think

0:48:26.120 --> 0:48:28.920
<v Speaker 4>that that would mean that it was a bad decision

0:48:28.920 --> 0:48:31.399
<v Speaker 4>on voting rights. It was a good decision on voting rights.

0:48:31.440 --> 0:48:35.040
<v Speaker 4>But the way they reached the case was basically in

0:48:35.160 --> 0:48:38.400
<v Speaker 4>voting this principle that said that you can't make election

0:48:38.520 --> 0:48:42.000
<v Speaker 4>changes too close to the election. Now, that was a

0:48:42.040 --> 0:48:43.799
<v Speaker 4>good thing in this case, but a lot of the

0:48:43.800 --> 0:48:46.480
<v Speaker 4>times the Supreme Court invokes the same principle to then

0:48:46.640 --> 0:48:51.200
<v Speaker 4>reinstate discriminatory voting. Yeah, exactly, so they it's mostly been

0:48:51.280 --> 0:48:53.520
<v Speaker 4>used for crappy purposes. So I think the three liberals

0:48:53.840 --> 0:48:56.160
<v Speaker 4>may view this as something of a pyrrhic victory where

0:48:56.160 --> 0:48:59.200
<v Speaker 4>they said, listen, the Conservatives are giving us a win here,

0:48:59.280 --> 0:49:00.760
<v Speaker 4>but they're about the fust.

0:49:01.040 --> 0:49:03.080
<v Speaker 1>So do you think they see something coming?

0:49:03.440 --> 0:49:05.839
<v Speaker 4>I don't know. If there's something coming. My guess is yes,

0:49:05.880 --> 0:49:07.920
<v Speaker 4>But I also think they're probably just worried about. Listen,

0:49:08.239 --> 0:49:11.440
<v Speaker 4>you expand this principle that is generally speaking been used

0:49:11.719 --> 0:49:15.080
<v Speaker 4>to curtail voting rights. You're expanding it in a good

0:49:15.120 --> 0:49:17.279
<v Speaker 4>way here, but then you could weaponize it in a

0:49:17.320 --> 0:49:20.080
<v Speaker 4>bad way further. So I think that's why they dissented.

0:49:20.160 --> 0:49:23.520
<v Speaker 4>So every victory on voting rights by the Supreme Court,

0:49:23.560 --> 0:49:25.279
<v Speaker 4>which is a rare in of itself, always comes to

0:49:25.320 --> 0:49:27.719
<v Speaker 4>some kind of asterisk, and I think that that's the

0:49:27.800 --> 0:49:30.480
<v Speaker 4>asterisk in this case. But you know, again, live to

0:49:30.520 --> 0:49:31.760
<v Speaker 4>fight another day, right.

0:49:31.960 --> 0:49:33.440
<v Speaker 2>Oh so interesting?

0:49:33.600 --> 0:49:36.880
<v Speaker 1>So what's still on the docket with the Supreme Court?

0:49:37.000 --> 0:49:40.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, besides the death of democracy? And they're also

0:49:40.320 --> 0:49:43.279
<v Speaker 1>going to fuck over the birth control pill staff, not

0:49:43.400 --> 0:49:46.319
<v Speaker 1>the birth control, the meth of pristone. Talk to us

0:49:46.320 --> 0:49:49.759
<v Speaker 1>about what else you see that's voting rights wise on

0:49:50.040 --> 0:49:51.600
<v Speaker 1>the Supreme Court docket.

0:49:51.800 --> 0:49:54.160
<v Speaker 4>We're still waiting for them to issue a decision in

0:49:54.200 --> 0:49:58.280
<v Speaker 4>a South Carolina redistriction case, which is Nancy Mace's congressional district.

0:49:58.440 --> 0:50:02.120
<v Speaker 4>And the crazy thing here is that basically the lower

0:50:02.160 --> 0:50:05.840
<v Speaker 4>court struck down her district. They called it stark racial jerrymandering. Basically,

0:50:05.880 --> 0:50:07.600
<v Speaker 4>they took a bunch of black voters out of the

0:50:07.600 --> 0:50:10.080
<v Speaker 4>district to make it a lot more Republican. Mace has

0:50:10.080 --> 0:50:12.320
<v Speaker 4>become a lot Trumpier as a result. Remember she was

0:50:12.360 --> 0:50:15.800
<v Speaker 4>one of I think seven House Republicans who ousted Kevin McCarthy,

0:50:16.200 --> 0:50:20.160
<v Speaker 4>and so she's become very trumpy. And essentially this was

0:50:20.160 --> 0:50:22.920
<v Speaker 4>appealed to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court was told

0:50:22.960 --> 0:50:26.359
<v Speaker 4>to act by the beginning of the year. It's now

0:50:26.600 --> 0:50:29.640
<v Speaker 4>May and they haven't taken any action. And the lower

0:50:29.680 --> 0:50:32.840
<v Speaker 4>court that struck down the district was basically forced to

0:50:32.840 --> 0:50:35.759
<v Speaker 4>reinstate it because the Supreme Court had done nothing. So

0:50:35.800 --> 0:50:37.600
<v Speaker 4>it's kind of like the version of the immunity case.

0:50:37.880 --> 0:50:41.080
<v Speaker 4>They basically just ran out the clock to deny Democrats

0:50:41.120 --> 0:50:43.520
<v Speaker 4>having a shot at winning back another House seat. And

0:50:43.800 --> 0:50:46.960
<v Speaker 4>that's concerning because the House could be extremely close. I mean,

0:50:47.280 --> 0:50:49.560
<v Speaker 4>it could very well come down to one district.

0:50:49.880 --> 0:50:52.920
<v Speaker 2>The Louisiana decision gives a seat to Democrats, right.

0:50:53.080 --> 0:50:55.520
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, yeah, so basically, but I mean Democrats need more

0:50:55.560 --> 0:50:57.920
<v Speaker 4>than two seats. So right now, Democrats have picked up

0:50:57.960 --> 0:51:01.640
<v Speaker 4>seats in Alabama and Louisiana based on the court decisions,

0:51:01.680 --> 0:51:04.000
<v Speaker 4>they could have theoretically picked up another seat in South

0:51:04.000 --> 0:51:06.280
<v Speaker 4>Carolina that they're not going to pick up. The problem

0:51:06.440 --> 0:51:08.960
<v Speaker 4>is is that in North Carolina, Republicans drew a really

0:51:09.000 --> 0:51:11.000
<v Speaker 4>jerrymandered map that's going to get them three to four

0:51:11.040 --> 0:51:14.160
<v Speaker 4>new seats, So you've got to make up those seats somewhere.

0:51:14.320 --> 0:51:16.440
<v Speaker 4>There's some talk about whether they could pick up seats

0:51:16.440 --> 0:51:19.480
<v Speaker 4>in New York, but New York actually passed a redistricting

0:51:19.520 --> 0:51:20.720
<v Speaker 4>map that was very similar.

0:51:20.960 --> 0:51:22.319
<v Speaker 2>It's so fucked up.

0:51:22.680 --> 0:51:27.000
<v Speaker 1>New York passed basically a completely unjenary mandered redistricting map.

0:51:27.160 --> 0:51:29.799
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean, I think that the conventional wisdom here

0:51:29.880 --> 0:51:32.440
<v Speaker 4>is that the New York Democrats feel like they can

0:51:32.600 --> 0:51:35.200
<v Speaker 4>just win seats outright on this map. But I mean,

0:51:35.239 --> 0:51:38.680
<v Speaker 4>they certainly didn't adopt in North Carolina tactics. And some

0:51:38.719 --> 0:51:42.640
<v Speaker 4>people would view this as unile or disarmament that basically

0:51:42.840 --> 0:51:45.759
<v Speaker 4>Republicans in North Carolina jerrymandered as aggressively as they could

0:51:46.040 --> 0:51:48.239
<v Speaker 4>and New York didn't. Now, maybe Democrats in New York

0:51:48.280 --> 0:51:51.280
<v Speaker 4>were worried about court striking down a map, but nonetheless

0:51:51.320 --> 0:51:54.520
<v Speaker 4>they add the power to jerrymander Moore and they didn't

0:51:54.560 --> 0:51:56.239
<v Speaker 4>and we can argue whether it's a good thing or

0:51:56.239 --> 0:51:59.000
<v Speaker 4>a bad thing that parties are basically just try to

0:51:59.080 --> 0:52:02.759
<v Speaker 4>jerrymander the fuck of things. I think that's ultimately bad

0:52:02.800 --> 0:52:06.680
<v Speaker 4>for democracy when they engage in like a gerrymandering arms race.

0:52:06.719 --> 0:52:08.759
<v Speaker 4>But I think it's also fair to argue that if

0:52:08.800 --> 0:52:10.400
<v Speaker 4>one party is doing it, then the other party has

0:52:10.440 --> 0:52:11.920
<v Speaker 4>no choice but to do it as well. But it's

0:52:11.960 --> 0:52:14.400
<v Speaker 4>a complicated argument, and I don't think it's probably very

0:52:14.400 --> 0:52:16.239
<v Speaker 4>good for democracy if that's where we end up.

0:52:16.640 --> 0:52:19.200
<v Speaker 2>So interesting. Thank you, thank you, thank you.

0:52:19.239 --> 0:52:21.640
<v Speaker 4>Ari, thanks so much. Molly really appreciate it.

0:52:23.840 --> 0:52:28.600
<v Speaker 2>No moment full Jesse Cannon.

0:52:28.560 --> 0:52:29.440
<v Speaker 4>Molly junk Fast.

0:52:29.480 --> 0:52:31.680
<v Speaker 5>It seems like Donald Trump decided to do Joe Biden

0:52:31.719 --> 0:52:32.359
<v Speaker 5>a favor today.

0:52:32.360 --> 0:52:35.400
<v Speaker 1>What are you seeing here? So? Donald Trump said on

0:52:35.440 --> 0:52:41.720
<v Speaker 1>an interview that he was looking at placing restrictions on contraception.

0:52:42.160 --> 0:52:44.400
<v Speaker 1>Let me tell you a little more about this. Trump

0:52:44.480 --> 0:52:46.880
<v Speaker 1>was asked by a local Pittsburgh TV station, do you

0:52:46.920 --> 0:52:51.759
<v Speaker 1>support any restriction on a person's right to contraception that's

0:52:51.800 --> 0:52:54.480
<v Speaker 1>birth control, and he said, we are looking at that.

0:52:54.960 --> 0:52:59.239
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to have a policy on that very shortly.

0:52:59.640 --> 0:53:03.680
<v Speaker 1>Sounds like infrastructure week. I think it's something you'll find interesting.

0:53:03.800 --> 0:53:06.880
<v Speaker 1>Trump says, you will be releasing a very comprehensive policy

0:53:06.920 --> 0:53:10.080
<v Speaker 1>on contraception within a week or so. Things really have

0:53:10.160 --> 0:53:12.360
<v Speaker 1>to do a lot with the states, and some states

0:53:12.360 --> 0:53:15.040
<v Speaker 1>are going to have different policies than others. That's pretty

0:53:15.040 --> 0:53:18.239
<v Speaker 1>scary stuff. I never thought that we would be in

0:53:18.320 --> 0:53:23.120
<v Speaker 1>this place in America. Really scary. That's it for this

0:53:23.200 --> 0:53:26.800
<v Speaker 1>episode of Fast Politics. Tune in every Monday, Wednesday, and

0:53:26.880 --> 0:53:29.959
<v Speaker 1>Friday to hear the best minds in politics makes sense

0:53:30.000 --> 0:53:33.040
<v Speaker 1>of all this chaos. If you enjoyed what you've heard,

0:53:33.440 --> 0:53:36.360
<v Speaker 1>please send it to a friend and keep the conversation going.

0:53:36.760 --> 0:53:38.440
<v Speaker 1>And again, thanks for listening.