WEBVTT - How Carbon-14 Dating Works

0:00:00.720 --> 0:00:03.520
<v Speaker 1>Hey, San Francisco, we want to get back to our

0:00:03.560 --> 0:00:08.880
<v Speaker 1>city by bay, so we are this January. That's right, man,

0:00:09.000 --> 0:00:11.440
<v Speaker 1>We're going back to Sketch Fest. It's become an annual

0:00:11.480 --> 0:00:14.600
<v Speaker 1>deal for us. There at the Castro Theater always some

0:00:14.640 --> 0:00:17.480
<v Speaker 1>of the best audiences of the year. You are our peeps,

0:00:17.480 --> 0:00:19.400
<v Speaker 1>and we love coming to see you. So get your

0:00:19.400 --> 0:00:22.600
<v Speaker 1>tickets to see us at the Castro. H what day

0:00:22.600 --> 0:00:26.000
<v Speaker 1>are we there? We're gonna be there Saturday, January. That's

0:00:26.079 --> 0:00:29.200
<v Speaker 1>right for a prime time show, yep. So go to

0:00:29.440 --> 0:00:31.600
<v Speaker 1>s y s K live dot com and follow the

0:00:31.640 --> 0:00:34.239
<v Speaker 1>links to get information and tickets and we'll see you

0:00:34.240 --> 0:00:38.320
<v Speaker 1>guys in January. Welcome to Stuff You Should Know, a

0:00:38.400 --> 0:00:46.920
<v Speaker 1>production of My Heart Radios How Stuff Works. Hey, and

0:00:46.960 --> 0:00:49.960
<v Speaker 1>welcome to the podcast. I'm Josh Clark. There's Charles W.

0:00:50.080 --> 0:00:53.519
<v Speaker 1>Chuck Bryan over there. There's Jerry right there, just laughing

0:00:53.520 --> 0:00:56.240
<v Speaker 1>it up. Yeah, and this is Stuff you should Know.

0:00:57.360 --> 0:01:02.200
<v Speaker 1>The jokes are Jerry ed issue Dent Science Edition a

0:01:02.360 --> 0:01:06.240
<v Speaker 1>k a. Chuck Dies Slowly inside Edition. Dude, No, it's

0:01:06.280 --> 0:01:09.199
<v Speaker 1>not You're gonna do just fine. This is all so intuitive,

0:01:09.200 --> 0:01:12.440
<v Speaker 1>it's wonderful. I'm not worried about not doing fine, but

0:01:12.480 --> 0:01:16.600
<v Speaker 1>thanks for the Reachirch. Well then I'm I'm really excited

0:01:16.600 --> 0:01:18.720
<v Speaker 1>about this. If you know that, I think you're gonna

0:01:18.760 --> 0:01:21.119
<v Speaker 1>do fine. You are going to as well. I'm going

0:01:21.160 --> 0:01:24.279
<v Speaker 1>to see to it. I think Jerry's gonna do great. Jerry,

0:01:24.280 --> 0:01:26.800
<v Speaker 1>how how are you doing over there? Okay, she's pressing

0:01:26.840 --> 0:01:31.520
<v Speaker 1>buttons like I've never seen her press buttons. Stop to that. Um,

0:01:31.560 --> 0:01:33.960
<v Speaker 1>I wonder what kind of weird sound effects just happened

0:01:34.000 --> 0:01:38.800
<v Speaker 1>after touching all those buttons. Jerry just laughed. I don't

0:01:38.800 --> 0:01:42.040
<v Speaker 1>know if the mic pick that up. All right, everybody's like, okay,

0:01:42.400 --> 0:01:45.280
<v Speaker 1>you're officially stalling now. Jerry's a quiet laugher. Though you

0:01:45.319 --> 0:01:48.560
<v Speaker 1>ever noticed that it's all knows, Yeah, she's all knows.

0:01:51.000 --> 0:01:56.120
<v Speaker 1>This is Jerry laughing hard. There's some doing it right now.

0:01:56.200 --> 0:01:59.000
<v Speaker 1>Serious a SMR triggering going on right now, that's right.

0:01:59.400 --> 0:02:02.440
<v Speaker 1>And there's of this not on the microphone cover, all right,

0:02:02.640 --> 0:02:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Carbon fourteen dating It works sort of the end. It's

0:02:07.280 --> 0:02:10.680
<v Speaker 1>not the worst description of it ever. Yeah, we can

0:02:10.720 --> 0:02:13.480
<v Speaker 1>do better than that, though, Yes, and luckily you did

0:02:13.520 --> 0:02:15.400
<v Speaker 1>a great job with this. But I also you know,

0:02:15.680 --> 0:02:18.919
<v Speaker 1>my advice to anyone if you don't understand the science thing,

0:02:19.720 --> 0:02:22.480
<v Speaker 1>and you're an adult, just don't worry about what anyone

0:02:22.520 --> 0:02:24.519
<v Speaker 1>behind you thinks. Just looking at your laptop and you

0:02:24.639 --> 0:02:28.480
<v Speaker 1>go to the most rudimentary children's science website you can find,

0:02:29.240 --> 0:02:31.560
<v Speaker 1>and that always helps. There is no shame in that,

0:02:31.639 --> 0:02:34.639
<v Speaker 1>no shame because seriously, the people who write those websites

0:02:34.680 --> 0:02:37.359
<v Speaker 1>are probably some of the best science explainers on the

0:02:37.400 --> 0:02:40.480
<v Speaker 1>planet and they know how to really just not dumb

0:02:40.520 --> 0:02:43.560
<v Speaker 1>it down because kids are smart. But that's funny. You

0:02:43.600 --> 0:02:47.720
<v Speaker 1>flip flopped on kids. Apparently you mean stupid kids. Yeah,

0:02:47.960 --> 0:02:49.960
<v Speaker 1>you always said they were dumb until just now, So

0:02:50.080 --> 0:02:52.840
<v Speaker 1>good for you, Chuck. We're all over the map. Well,

0:02:52.880 --> 0:02:56.200
<v Speaker 1>I feel like we're really growing up these days. So

0:02:56.200 --> 0:02:58.240
<v Speaker 1>so Carbon four Team, for those of you who don't know,

0:02:58.480 --> 0:03:04.120
<v Speaker 1>is this um really clever scientific method where you can

0:03:04.160 --> 0:03:10.160
<v Speaker 1>actually kind of look inside of a material and figure

0:03:10.200 --> 0:03:12.680
<v Speaker 1>out how much carbon fourteen is in there, and by

0:03:12.720 --> 0:03:15.280
<v Speaker 1>doing so, you can actually tell how old it is,

0:03:15.440 --> 0:03:18.000
<v Speaker 1>or at least how long ago it was since the

0:03:18.080 --> 0:03:22.160
<v Speaker 1>thing you're dating was alive. Yes, and it is a

0:03:22.200 --> 0:03:24.840
<v Speaker 1>comparative Well, there's another word for that. What's it called

0:03:25.040 --> 0:03:28.519
<v Speaker 1>relative dating? Yeah, relative dating, I guess comparative isn't the

0:03:28.560 --> 0:03:33.160
<v Speaker 1>worst word, especially if you're talking about literature, right because

0:03:33.200 --> 0:03:35.880
<v Speaker 1>what they're doing is comparing it to things that are

0:03:35.880 --> 0:03:39.200
<v Speaker 1>alive today, and because of all the gobbledygook we're about

0:03:39.200 --> 0:03:43.800
<v Speaker 1>to talk about, that equals a pretty good estimate. And

0:03:43.840 --> 0:03:46.440
<v Speaker 1>then from there they are even further things that one

0:03:46.480 --> 0:03:48.960
<v Speaker 1>can do if one we're so inclined as a scientist,

0:03:49.080 --> 0:03:50.640
<v Speaker 1>and there are a lot of people who are inclined

0:03:50.680 --> 0:03:56.360
<v Speaker 1>to do this. This is a very exciting, um energetic

0:03:56.680 --> 0:03:59.520
<v Speaker 1>field of science right now, Like if you want to,

0:03:59.520 --> 0:04:02.200
<v Speaker 1>if you want to jump into an ever evolving, constantly

0:04:02.240 --> 0:04:08.200
<v Speaker 1>moving be a um field, the Baracas field kind of

0:04:08.720 --> 0:04:14.120
<v Speaker 1>um of of science, start studying radiocarbon dating actually wouldn't

0:04:14.120 --> 0:04:15.880
<v Speaker 1>be a ba Barakas field because didn't that stand for

0:04:15.920 --> 0:04:18.839
<v Speaker 1>bad attitude? Did it? I think so? Right? Oh, no,

0:04:18.920 --> 0:04:21.920
<v Speaker 1>one in radiocarbon dating has a bad attitude, but they

0:04:21.920 --> 0:04:24.760
<v Speaker 1>are be as right. But you're right it it is

0:04:24.839 --> 0:04:29.000
<v Speaker 1>ever evolving and they're constantly looking for better ways to

0:04:29.240 --> 0:04:34.120
<v Speaker 1>pinpoint more accurate timelines on things. So it's not like

0:04:34.160 --> 0:04:35.920
<v Speaker 1>a job you're going to get in and be like,

0:04:35.960 --> 0:04:38.760
<v Speaker 1>oh this whole thing again, right, No, no, And it's

0:04:38.839 --> 0:04:41.200
<v Speaker 1>it's just like they're constantly filling in blanks and stuff

0:04:41.240 --> 0:04:44.240
<v Speaker 1>like that. It's just it's good work. So, um, what

0:04:44.279 --> 0:04:47.640
<v Speaker 1>they're looking for the people who do radiocarbon dating is

0:04:47.839 --> 0:04:51.120
<v Speaker 1>carbon fourteen, which I said, and that is radiocarbon. It's

0:04:51.120 --> 0:04:54.520
<v Speaker 1>called that because it's a radioactive form of carbon, that's right,

0:04:54.960 --> 0:04:58.599
<v Speaker 1>And it's everywhere on Earth. It's just all over the place.

0:04:58.640 --> 0:05:00.800
<v Speaker 1>It's part of the carbon side goal and it's part

0:05:00.839 --> 0:05:04.360
<v Speaker 1>of the web of life. But it starts out way

0:05:04.440 --> 0:05:08.640
<v Speaker 1>up in outer space as cosmic ray, that's right. Should

0:05:08.640 --> 0:05:11.720
<v Speaker 1>we give the basis definition before we jump to the

0:05:12.720 --> 0:05:15.320
<v Speaker 1>radio carbon dat Yeah? Yeah, I mean I think like

0:05:15.360 --> 0:05:19.000
<v Speaker 1>the most rudimentary definition might help some people out. Um.

0:05:19.040 --> 0:05:23.000
<v Speaker 1>But like you said, carbon fourteen is everywhere, including inside us,

0:05:23.440 --> 0:05:27.960
<v Speaker 1>because it's in plants via photosynthesis, and we eat plants,

0:05:28.320 --> 0:05:31.880
<v Speaker 1>and animals eat plants. Some people eat animals, and because

0:05:31.880 --> 0:05:35.480
<v Speaker 1>of that, it's kind of in every living thing. Uh.

0:05:35.520 --> 0:05:41.520
<v Speaker 1>And carbon fourteen dies away very slowly. And because we

0:05:41.560 --> 0:05:45.560
<v Speaker 1>know this, because we know it happens predictably, then we

0:05:45.600 --> 0:05:48.520
<v Speaker 1>can measure that in a sample and then compare it,

0:05:48.560 --> 0:05:52.120
<v Speaker 1>like I said, to something living and then you do

0:05:52.160 --> 0:05:55.440
<v Speaker 1>a little math Ipso fact though it's probably an ipso

0:05:55.480 --> 0:05:59.080
<v Speaker 1>facto is it? Presto change, Yeah, presto change about it

0:05:59.160 --> 0:06:04.760
<v Speaker 1>being about about it being bon Jovi? What was that

0:06:04.760 --> 0:06:07.960
<v Speaker 1>that was yours? Was it? Yeah? Man? You came up

0:06:07.960 --> 0:06:10.920
<v Speaker 1>with that on a carousel at Zoo Atlanta in about

0:06:10.920 --> 0:06:14.240
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and twelve. That's right. That's where that's carbon

0:06:14.279 --> 0:06:18.000
<v Speaker 1>dated too. Yeah, that joke. But because we know that,

0:06:18.040 --> 0:06:20.599
<v Speaker 1>we can compare it to something that's alive today and

0:06:20.640 --> 0:06:22.440
<v Speaker 1>then with a little math we can figure out the

0:06:22.880 --> 0:06:25.360
<v Speaker 1>rough estimate of how old it is. Yeah, that's I mean,

0:06:25.360 --> 0:06:27.800
<v Speaker 1>that's radio carbon dating in a nutshell for sure. That's right.

0:06:27.880 --> 0:06:30.520
<v Speaker 1>But like you said, it starts out as cosmic rays

0:06:31.080 --> 0:06:34.480
<v Speaker 1>way out in outer space, right, and so a cosmic ray,

0:06:34.560 --> 0:06:37.279
<v Speaker 1>we're not entirely certain where they come from, but they're

0:06:37.520 --> 0:06:42.400
<v Speaker 1>super high energy particles, usually like pieces of atoms, that

0:06:42.440 --> 0:06:45.640
<v Speaker 1>are just shooting towards Earth and through outer space at

0:06:45.760 --> 0:06:50.440
<v Speaker 1>incredible speeds, and when they encounter the atmosphere, they start

0:06:50.680 --> 0:06:53.680
<v Speaker 1>running into the atoms that make up the atmosphere. And

0:06:53.760 --> 0:06:56.600
<v Speaker 1>because these particles are so high energy, these cosmic rays,

0:06:57.000 --> 0:07:00.120
<v Speaker 1>when they smack into atoms and other particles in all

0:07:00.120 --> 0:07:03.560
<v Speaker 1>acules and all that. They just burst them apart, not

0:07:03.720 --> 0:07:06.840
<v Speaker 1>just burst like an adam into like it's protons and neutrons.

0:07:06.880 --> 0:07:10.840
<v Speaker 1>It'll tear apart of neutron like like it's nothing. Actually

0:07:10.880 --> 0:07:19.480
<v Speaker 1>creates other high energy particles like muons, pions, x rays, um,

0:07:19.600 --> 0:07:25.960
<v Speaker 1>what else? Zaxon's No, that was a video game, was it, Zaxon? Yeah?

0:07:27.560 --> 0:07:29.800
<v Speaker 1>With a z uh Yeah. I think it was z

0:07:30.000 --> 0:07:35.400
<v Speaker 1>A double x O N. I am not familiar with that. Okay,

0:07:35.480 --> 0:07:37.600
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't a stand up game. Actually it may have been,

0:07:37.840 --> 0:07:39.440
<v Speaker 1>but I played it on a r because I could

0:07:39.440 --> 0:07:42.200
<v Speaker 1>see a kid in a Kiss T shirt playing that

0:07:42.240 --> 0:07:45.480
<v Speaker 1>game stand up in an arcade. Yes, it sounds like

0:07:45.520 --> 0:07:47.280
<v Speaker 1>that kind of game. That would have been me had

0:07:47.280 --> 0:07:50.720
<v Speaker 1>I not been deathly afraid of Kiss because they were devil.

0:07:51.400 --> 0:07:55.760
<v Speaker 1>They were nights in Satan's service obviously. Yeah. Okay, So

0:07:55.800 --> 0:07:59.440
<v Speaker 1>all these muons, X rays, pions, all that stuff, there's

0:07:59.480 --> 0:08:02.400
<v Speaker 1>one other little particle that can be created when a

0:08:02.440 --> 0:08:06.600
<v Speaker 1>cosmic ray collides with an atom, and that is a neutron,

0:08:06.640 --> 0:08:11.160
<v Speaker 1>a high energy neutron. Right, that's right. Okay, So what's

0:08:11.160 --> 0:08:14.960
<v Speaker 1>happening now is a chain reaction because cosmic rays are

0:08:14.960 --> 0:08:18.840
<v Speaker 1>bombarding the atmosphere, that's right, And uh, what can happen

0:08:18.960 --> 0:08:22.280
<v Speaker 1>is they can get really pushy. Uh if a high

0:08:22.360 --> 0:08:26.280
<v Speaker 1>energy neutron collides with let's say a nitrogen fourteen atom, Yeah,

0:08:26.520 --> 0:08:28.680
<v Speaker 1>they'll get real pushy and they'll just knock the proton

0:08:28.760 --> 0:08:30.800
<v Speaker 1>off and move right in there and say this is

0:08:30.880 --> 0:08:33.800
<v Speaker 1>my house now, right. So what was once a stable

0:08:33.840 --> 0:08:40.200
<v Speaker 1>atom nitrogen fourteen, which had seven protons and seven neutron,

0:08:41.080 --> 0:08:46.359
<v Speaker 1>is now an unstable atom with six protons and eight neutrons,

0:08:46.520 --> 0:08:50.040
<v Speaker 1>and now it's no longer nitrogen fourteen. What you have, fella,

0:08:50.440 --> 0:08:55.000
<v Speaker 1>is carbon fourteen. Yes, an unstable meaning radioactive, but not

0:08:55.200 --> 0:09:00.160
<v Speaker 1>radioactive meaning like scary and dangerous. No, it just means it.

0:09:00.160 --> 0:09:03.720
<v Speaker 1>It's it's in a higher energy state, and it's temporary.

0:09:03.840 --> 0:09:11.960
<v Speaker 1>Eventually wants to decay back into that um nitrogen fourteen stately, Yeah,

0:09:12.000 --> 0:09:16.880
<v Speaker 1>eventually it's sometimes spontaneously, sometime down the road, that neutron

0:09:17.040 --> 0:09:20.600
<v Speaker 1>will turn back into a proton, which sounds like magic

0:09:20.960 --> 0:09:24.240
<v Speaker 1>until you realize that atoms and all of the particles

0:09:24.240 --> 0:09:27.200
<v Speaker 1>that make up atoms are really just vibrations of energy,

0:09:27.520 --> 0:09:30.000
<v Speaker 1>and it can temporarily go to a higher energy state

0:09:30.080 --> 0:09:32.520
<v Speaker 1>or a lower energy state. And that is how something

0:09:32.559 --> 0:09:34.880
<v Speaker 1>would change from like a high energy neutron back to

0:09:35.200 --> 0:09:39.439
<v Speaker 1>a proton. Right. And he said that carbon fourteen is everywhere,

0:09:39.960 --> 0:09:43.680
<v Speaker 1>which is true, but that doesn't mean there's like tons

0:09:43.679 --> 0:09:48.160
<v Speaker 1>and tons of it relative to carbon carbon twelve. Yeah,

0:09:48.360 --> 0:09:51.080
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot more carbon twelve. Right. So carbon twelve

0:09:51.120 --> 0:09:54.880
<v Speaker 1>is the stable version of carbon, and it's way more

0:09:54.920 --> 0:09:57.319
<v Speaker 1>abundant than carbon fourteen. Carbon fourteen is kind of like

0:09:57.400 --> 0:10:02.080
<v Speaker 1>a freak, a monster that gets made accidentally, and it's

0:10:02.120 --> 0:10:04.240
<v Speaker 1>extremely rare, even though there's a ton of it, but

0:10:04.320 --> 0:10:07.640
<v Speaker 1>compared to carbon twelve, it's very rare. Something like one

0:10:08.160 --> 0:10:15.600
<v Speaker 1>carbon fourteen atom for every trillion carbon atoms. That's that's

0:10:15.600 --> 0:10:18.440
<v Speaker 1>that's pretty rare. But it also gives us a ratio chuck,

0:10:18.480 --> 0:10:21.679
<v Speaker 1>And this is a big initial point. Yeah, And like

0:10:21.760 --> 0:10:24.600
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned before too, or maybe I said it, it's uh,

0:10:24.640 --> 0:10:27.680
<v Speaker 1>this is part of the carbon cycle. So it's inside

0:10:27.880 --> 0:10:30.040
<v Speaker 1>all the plants and the animals. Reading the plants were

0:10:30.040 --> 0:10:33.360
<v Speaker 1>eating plants, some people eat animals, so it's inside all

0:10:33.400 --> 0:10:37.800
<v Speaker 1>of us and it's everywhere. Uh. But that ratio is

0:10:37.840 --> 0:10:41.000
<v Speaker 1>really important because, like we said, it starts to decrease

0:10:41.040 --> 0:10:44.800
<v Speaker 1>because it craves homeostasis and wants to get back to

0:10:44.920 --> 0:10:49.320
<v Speaker 1>its former life. It's a stable particles, a stable boy,

0:10:49.559 --> 0:10:53.880
<v Speaker 1>stable boy, brush that horse, and it would be it

0:10:53.880 --> 0:10:55.760
<v Speaker 1>would be an atom because it's going from a carbon

0:10:55.840 --> 0:10:59.360
<v Speaker 1>fourteen atom to a nitrogen fourteen atom, right, But that

0:10:59.440 --> 0:11:01.800
<v Speaker 1>ratio is in ard it because as it's you know,

0:11:01.920 --> 0:11:05.160
<v Speaker 1>dies away, they're going to be fewer and fewer carbon

0:11:05.200 --> 0:11:09.400
<v Speaker 1>fourteen atoms with that dead organism over time, whereas if

0:11:09.440 --> 0:11:12.319
<v Speaker 1>something is alive, it has that steady amount. And that's

0:11:12.320 --> 0:11:16.240
<v Speaker 1>where the comparison comes in, right, because as far as

0:11:16.559 --> 0:11:20.720
<v Speaker 1>a plant, or you, or a dog or anything living

0:11:21.720 --> 0:11:26.319
<v Speaker 1>is concerned, there's no difference whatsoever between a carbon fourteen

0:11:27.200 --> 0:11:31.000
<v Speaker 1>molecule of carbon dioxide and a carbon twelve molecule of

0:11:31.000 --> 0:11:33.520
<v Speaker 1>carbon dioxide. Yeah. I mean, it sounds hard to digest

0:11:33.520 --> 0:11:36.680
<v Speaker 1>because we said it's radioactive, but there really is no

0:11:36.800 --> 0:11:39.760
<v Speaker 1>difference as far as we're concerned, right. Um, It basically

0:11:39.800 --> 0:11:43.439
<v Speaker 1>takes a human scientists to analyze it using an extremely

0:11:43.440 --> 0:11:46.320
<v Speaker 1>sophisticated machine to be able to tell the difference. So

0:11:46.400 --> 0:11:48.679
<v Speaker 1>that means that when it does, you know, come down

0:11:48.720 --> 0:11:50.960
<v Speaker 1>out of the atmosphere, it's spewed out by a volcano

0:11:51.080 --> 0:11:54.720
<v Speaker 1>or something like that. Um that it just becomes part

0:11:54.720 --> 0:11:58.280
<v Speaker 1>of the food chain like any other atom of part

0:11:58.360 --> 0:12:02.479
<v Speaker 1>of carbon that's locked in with oxygen to form carbon dioxide.

0:12:02.920 --> 0:12:07.080
<v Speaker 1>So as you're living, like you were saying, you're constantly

0:12:07.120 --> 0:12:09.800
<v Speaker 1>taking it in, you're constantly eating. It's just a part

0:12:09.840 --> 0:12:13.960
<v Speaker 1>of life, as carbon fourteen and carbon twelve. Right, But

0:12:14.000 --> 0:12:17.920
<v Speaker 1>when you die, you stop taking in carbon of all kinds,

0:12:18.320 --> 0:12:20.319
<v Speaker 1>and all of a sudden that a clock has said

0:12:20.720 --> 0:12:24.360
<v Speaker 1>because of that decay of carbon fourteen, that's right, And

0:12:25.080 --> 0:12:28.200
<v Speaker 1>that decay, like we said, it happens spontaneously, and Adam

0:12:28.280 --> 0:12:33.000
<v Speaker 1>might suddenly convert from carbon fourteen to nitrogen fourteen. You

0:12:33.040 --> 0:12:35.840
<v Speaker 1>can't predict when that's going to happen because of the uncertainty.

0:12:36.080 --> 0:12:40.080
<v Speaker 1>That's part of quantum physics, right, But if you have

0:12:40.160 --> 0:12:43.439
<v Speaker 1>a large enough sample, then you can start to predict

0:12:43.840 --> 0:12:48.360
<v Speaker 1>when x number or x percentage of that that sample

0:12:48.360 --> 0:12:53.680
<v Speaker 1>of carbon fourteen will have spontaneously changed from carbon fourteen

0:12:54.080 --> 0:12:57.200
<v Speaker 1>to nitrogen fourteen. And that's called the half life. That

0:12:57.480 --> 0:12:59.920
<v Speaker 1>which is everyone has heard of. That's that's half life.

0:13:00.000 --> 0:13:02.560
<v Speaker 1>It's just standard stuff. Yeah, I think everyone has heard

0:13:02.559 --> 0:13:06.200
<v Speaker 1>of half life, and about the people that know that

0:13:06.360 --> 0:13:09.280
<v Speaker 1>term don't really fully grasp it. Well, yeah, it's just

0:13:09.320 --> 0:13:12.920
<v Speaker 1>this the amount of time it takes for half of

0:13:13.000 --> 0:13:17.760
<v Speaker 1>the radioactive atoms in any given sample to convert back

0:13:17.800 --> 0:13:21.120
<v Speaker 1>into a stable form. Yeah, that's it. It's pretty easy. Uh.

0:13:21.160 --> 0:13:23.040
<v Speaker 1>And we know in this case the half life and

0:13:23.040 --> 0:13:25.400
<v Speaker 1>we'll get to how we figured all this out, but

0:13:25.480 --> 0:13:29.319
<v Speaker 1>the half life of carbon fourteen is five thousand, seven

0:13:29.400 --> 0:13:33.920
<v Speaker 1>hundred and thirty years. Um, if you know you keep going,

0:13:33.960 --> 0:13:37.960
<v Speaker 1>it goes to a quarter life, then I guess in eight. Yeah,

0:13:37.960 --> 0:13:40.040
<v Speaker 1>it just keeps going. So like if you have a

0:13:40.120 --> 0:13:44.240
<v Speaker 1>hundred carbon fourteen atoms, if you come visit it in

0:13:44.320 --> 0:13:47.400
<v Speaker 1>fifty and thirty years, you're gonna find you a fifty.

0:13:47.760 --> 0:13:51.120
<v Speaker 1>And if you visit in another thirty years, you're going

0:13:51.160 --> 0:13:54.800
<v Speaker 1>to have then twelve and a half or thirteen maybe,

0:13:54.840 --> 0:13:58.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. It just keeps going until there's ultimately none.

0:13:58.640 --> 0:14:00.880
<v Speaker 1>Laughed over a long enought touch of time, which is

0:14:01.080 --> 0:14:04.079
<v Speaker 1>with carbon fourteen, like fifty or sixty thousand years. Yeah,

0:14:04.080 --> 0:14:08.120
<v Speaker 1>I saw sixty thousand mostly, but then I think it

0:14:08.320 --> 0:14:11.680
<v Speaker 1>starts can get a little hinky at fifty, So fifty

0:14:11.720 --> 0:14:13.600
<v Speaker 1>to sixty is pretty good, and I think it gets

0:14:13.679 --> 0:14:17.200
<v Speaker 1>hinky at this point because our because of the equipment

0:14:17.200 --> 0:14:20.120
<v Speaker 1>we're using to measure it. I think as our equipment

0:14:20.120 --> 0:14:22.960
<v Speaker 1>gets more and more sensitive, that time will go further

0:14:23.000 --> 0:14:25.800
<v Speaker 1>and further out, because as long as you have two atoms,

0:14:25.840 --> 0:14:28.240
<v Speaker 1>you should still be able to measure them, you know,

0:14:28.840 --> 0:14:32.760
<v Speaker 1>for sure, or even one. Probably, I'm not going to

0:14:32.880 --> 0:14:37.080
<v Speaker 1>go out on a limb for that one, but I'm gonna.

0:14:37.160 --> 0:14:40.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna caveat that with them probably. Okay, Well, let's

0:14:40.120 --> 0:14:43.000
<v Speaker 1>take a little break here and we're gonna come back

0:14:43.000 --> 0:14:46.320
<v Speaker 1>here in a second. Talk about the very smart dude

0:14:46.360 --> 0:14:49.120
<v Speaker 1>who figured all this stuff out quite a few years ago.

0:15:00.960 --> 0:15:02.800
<v Speaker 1>All right, Chuck, Just to recap real quick, because I

0:15:02.840 --> 0:15:05.920
<v Speaker 1>think this this episode bears it. Okay, Okay, you've got

0:15:05.960 --> 0:15:08.720
<v Speaker 1>carbon fourteen. It's part of the food chain. You take

0:15:08.800 --> 0:15:11.160
<v Speaker 1>it in as you're living. When you die, you stop

0:15:11.240 --> 0:15:14.920
<v Speaker 1>taking it in, and so those carbon fourteen adams start

0:15:14.960 --> 0:15:17.840
<v Speaker 1>to decay, which means that if you compared a dead

0:15:18.000 --> 0:15:22.120
<v Speaker 1>organism to a living organism, and the ratio of carbon

0:15:22.160 --> 0:15:25.800
<v Speaker 1>fourteen to carbon twelve in the dead organism compared to

0:15:25.840 --> 0:15:28.840
<v Speaker 1>the living organism, you be able to tell how long

0:15:28.880 --> 0:15:32.040
<v Speaker 1>ago the dead organism was alive and taking him more carbon.

0:15:32.240 --> 0:15:34.920
<v Speaker 1>And that's the basis of radio carbon dating. That's right.

0:15:35.080 --> 0:15:38.160
<v Speaker 1>So that is Uh, we have Amanda thank from the

0:15:38.200 --> 0:15:43.120
<v Speaker 1>University of Chicago name Willard Libby. That's a great name.

0:15:43.360 --> 0:15:47.680
<v Speaker 1>I heard his name was wild Man or wild Bill,

0:15:48.840 --> 0:15:52.400
<v Speaker 1>wild Man, Willard Libby, Yeah, because he's just crazy. I

0:15:52.440 --> 0:15:55.280
<v Speaker 1>guess you must have been a party animal. Who knows.

0:15:55.440 --> 0:15:59.040
<v Speaker 1>You don't get a nickname like wild Bill for nothing.

0:15:59.280 --> 0:16:02.040
<v Speaker 1>They don't go around handing those out to just anybody. Yeah,

0:16:02.040 --> 0:16:05.240
<v Speaker 1>not even just figuring out carbon fourteen dating. You wouldn't

0:16:05.240 --> 0:16:07.920
<v Speaker 1>get a wild man for that. No, No, like even

0:16:08.000 --> 0:16:12.520
<v Speaker 1>Chris Farley wasn't called wild Bill. I think Lillard Livy

0:16:12.560 --> 0:16:15.920
<v Speaker 1>had a side a side gig. Yeah, you know, but

0:16:16.080 --> 0:16:19.720
<v Speaker 1>he was the party monster maybe at the University of

0:16:19.760 --> 0:16:24.400
<v Speaker 1>Chicago in the nineteen forties. Perhaps, so he figured out

0:16:24.440 --> 0:16:27.880
<v Speaker 1>how carbon fourteen worked and how it could be used

0:16:27.920 --> 0:16:32.120
<v Speaker 1>to do this before we were even positive science even

0:16:32.200 --> 0:16:34.560
<v Speaker 1>knew for a fact that there was such a thing

0:16:34.560 --> 0:16:37.640
<v Speaker 1>as carbon fourteen. That's a pretty impressive, uh. And in fact,

0:16:38.760 --> 0:16:41.200
<v Speaker 1>it was just a few short years after we had

0:16:41.200 --> 0:16:45.080
<v Speaker 1>discovered cosmic rays. So he was really on the leading

0:16:45.160 --> 0:16:48.240
<v Speaker 1>edge of science. You know he was a wild man, right,

0:16:48.840 --> 0:16:51.080
<v Speaker 1>He's like, these particles, we're not even sure they exist,

0:16:51.240 --> 0:16:52.840
<v Speaker 1>but if they do, we could figure out how to

0:16:52.920 --> 0:16:55.400
<v Speaker 1>use them to date dead organisms. And he won a

0:16:55.440 --> 0:16:58.520
<v Speaker 1>Nobel Prize in nineteen sixty for this, I think rightfully.

0:16:58.560 --> 0:17:02.480
<v Speaker 1>So in chemistry, yeah, for sure, even though as we'll see,

0:17:02.520 --> 0:17:05.439
<v Speaker 1>he got a few things wrong. And the one thing

0:17:05.480 --> 0:17:07.600
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of tough to wrap your head around here

0:17:08.800 --> 0:17:13.119
<v Speaker 1>is he and this is it just is what it

0:17:13.160 --> 0:17:15.639
<v Speaker 1>is at this point, I think. But he selected nineteen fifty,

0:17:16.200 --> 0:17:19.959
<v Speaker 1>the year nineteen fifty is year zero for his experimentation,

0:17:20.760 --> 0:17:23.960
<v Speaker 1>and he compared all the samples against this, and that

0:17:24.119 --> 0:17:27.840
<v Speaker 1>is still what we do today. That we didn't. We

0:17:27.840 --> 0:17:31.239
<v Speaker 1>didn't revise a lot of this stuff. It's interesting, no, Like,

0:17:31.280 --> 0:17:33.880
<v Speaker 1>they definitely are, like, okay. I think the reason why

0:17:33.960 --> 0:17:36.040
<v Speaker 1>is because by the time it started to start to

0:17:36.119 --> 0:17:41.280
<v Speaker 1>become sophisticated and and more refined, so many samples had

0:17:41.320 --> 0:17:43.919
<v Speaker 1>gone through that it's like, we're just gonna stick with

0:17:44.000 --> 0:17:48.160
<v Speaker 1>this for now. It's really interesting. So nineteen fifty, when

0:17:48.160 --> 0:17:50.800
<v Speaker 1>you're radio carbon dating an object, that is year zero,

0:17:51.400 --> 0:17:53.840
<v Speaker 1>So um, anytime you get a date back, which we'll

0:17:53.840 --> 0:17:56.800
<v Speaker 1>talk about it's actually saying this is how long before

0:17:56.920 --> 0:17:59.960
<v Speaker 1>nineteen fifty this thing was last alive? Right, and we're

0:18:00.040 --> 0:18:01.959
<v Speaker 1>not talking it just it doesn't have to be like

0:18:02.040 --> 0:18:05.800
<v Speaker 1>a plant fossil um because we said carbon is in

0:18:06.080 --> 0:18:09.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, virtually everything. So a leather belt comes from

0:18:09.920 --> 0:18:14.200
<v Speaker 1>a cow, cow ate the plant um. What else wouldn't

0:18:14.200 --> 0:18:19.000
<v Speaker 1>plant in ships a pig fabrica. We find poop, of course,

0:18:19.040 --> 0:18:23.800
<v Speaker 1>old poop, old old alcohol, old beer because of yeast.

0:18:24.440 --> 0:18:28.920
<v Speaker 1>There are many, many, many things obviously bodies, oats, Yeah,

0:18:28.960 --> 0:18:33.840
<v Speaker 1>our pal. Yeah, as long as whatever you are dating

0:18:34.040 --> 0:18:37.520
<v Speaker 1>was at one point alive, which means it wasn't a

0:18:37.600 --> 0:18:42.200
<v Speaker 1>rock or a mineral from birth like it's you can

0:18:42.280 --> 0:18:43.719
<v Speaker 1>date it. You should be able to date as long

0:18:43.760 --> 0:18:47.960
<v Speaker 1>as it's about fifty or sixty thousand years or younger. Yeah,

0:18:48.040 --> 0:18:50.240
<v Speaker 1>But there was a problem early on in this process

0:18:50.280 --> 0:18:53.399
<v Speaker 1>because you needed a lot of this material, uh to

0:18:54.240 --> 0:18:57.880
<v Speaker 1>basically destroy to find out how old it is. And

0:18:58.320 --> 0:19:00.600
<v Speaker 1>people didn't want to give up these gray eight fines,

0:19:00.760 --> 0:19:05.000
<v Speaker 1>Like they're like, I found a a skull and they're like, well,

0:19:05.040 --> 0:19:06.960
<v Speaker 1>can we destroy that skull to find out how old

0:19:07.000 --> 0:19:09.359
<v Speaker 1>it is? And you know they would turn around and

0:19:09.359 --> 0:19:11.640
<v Speaker 1>say no, it's my skull, right right, And then the

0:19:11.760 --> 0:19:14.879
<v Speaker 1>radio carbon researchers saying, like I was just asking to

0:19:14.920 --> 0:19:16.920
<v Speaker 1>be pleasant, give me that skull. Yeah, but then you

0:19:16.920 --> 0:19:19.840
<v Speaker 1>would say, no, it's my skull and I'm just happy

0:19:20.000 --> 0:19:22.840
<v Speaker 1>to call it old right, And WELLRD Libby would step

0:19:22.880 --> 0:19:25.520
<v Speaker 1>in and just do like a wild man pile driver

0:19:25.720 --> 0:19:28.080
<v Speaker 1>on the guy with this skull got the name. You

0:19:28.119 --> 0:19:32.399
<v Speaker 1>would just come in and crush people hiding maybe in

0:19:32.440 --> 0:19:35.439
<v Speaker 1>another room and back or something, just pound someone to go,

0:19:37.440 --> 0:19:40.520
<v Speaker 1>he would swarm. Um. But here's the thing. We've gotten

0:19:40.520 --> 0:19:43.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot better over time. The equipment has gotten a

0:19:43.280 --> 0:19:46.240
<v Speaker 1>lot better, more sophisticated, so we don't need that much now.

0:19:46.400 --> 0:19:49.359
<v Speaker 1>And people are giving up their fines because you can

0:19:49.400 --> 0:19:53.199
<v Speaker 1>have a little gram bone from the skull and I

0:19:53.240 --> 0:19:56.199
<v Speaker 1>think everything will be okay. Yeah. And so because of that,

0:19:56.359 --> 0:20:00.000
<v Speaker 1>like it's gotten way more common to radio carbon dates

0:20:00.040 --> 0:20:04.440
<v Speaker 1>stuff I read in the UK. Um they really started

0:20:04.520 --> 0:20:07.560
<v Speaker 1>dating everything they found because the UK passed a lot

0:20:07.600 --> 0:20:09.800
<v Speaker 1>of that said, if you're a developer and you turn

0:20:09.880 --> 0:20:12.399
<v Speaker 1>up any sort of archaeological evidence, I'm like one of

0:20:12.400 --> 0:20:15.080
<v Speaker 1>your buildings or developments, you have to pay to have

0:20:15.160 --> 0:20:18.160
<v Speaker 1>it dated. And so like it started to kind of

0:20:18.200 --> 0:20:21.240
<v Speaker 1>get the burden for paying for it was shifted to industry,

0:20:21.760 --> 0:20:23.720
<v Speaker 1>and so it started to really blow up, and that

0:20:23.800 --> 0:20:26.840
<v Speaker 1>helped kind of push the technology along and help lower

0:20:26.880 --> 0:20:30.320
<v Speaker 1>the expense and increase the sophistication of the machines that

0:20:30.400 --> 0:20:34.639
<v Speaker 1>were being used. Yeah, it's pretty pretty neat how that happens. Well,

0:20:34.880 --> 0:20:36.840
<v Speaker 1>here's what you gotta do if you're gonna start out

0:20:36.880 --> 0:20:39.359
<v Speaker 1>this process is you've got to really clean your sample

0:20:39.600 --> 0:20:43.920
<v Speaker 1>very well. Otherwise it's gonna um you can mess up everything,

0:20:44.359 --> 0:20:46.800
<v Speaker 1>and not just the test that you're making. If you

0:20:46.840 --> 0:20:49.400
<v Speaker 1>have what's called a hot sample, which means you didn't

0:20:49.440 --> 0:20:51.600
<v Speaker 1>clean it well enough for it's contaminated a graham of

0:20:51.640 --> 0:20:57.159
<v Speaker 1>hot sample, you can destroy a lab basically to the

0:20:57.200 --> 0:20:59.280
<v Speaker 1>point where they'll just have to shut down for for

0:20:59.359 --> 0:21:02.200
<v Speaker 1>weeks or even months to get everything right, and everything

0:21:02.240 --> 0:21:05.400
<v Speaker 1>in there might be destroyed, like, yeah, all the other

0:21:05.400 --> 0:21:10.680
<v Speaker 1>samples that may be super valuable my skull. Yeah, you know. Sorry. Um,

0:21:10.720 --> 0:21:13.120
<v Speaker 1>so it's a big deal if something isn't cleaned right,

0:21:13.240 --> 0:21:16.200
<v Speaker 1>because it really throws everything off and CARU and everything else.

0:21:16.480 --> 0:21:19.120
<v Speaker 1>But once you do have it cleaned, um, when you

0:21:19.320 --> 0:21:21.640
<v Speaker 1>date it, there's a few different methods that you can use,

0:21:21.640 --> 0:21:23.800
<v Speaker 1>but the one that I saw is the most common

0:21:24.240 --> 0:21:30.639
<v Speaker 1>is actually turning that carbon based sample into carbon graphite,

0:21:30.680 --> 0:21:33.640
<v Speaker 1>like pure carbon. And then you take that little piece

0:21:33.680 --> 0:21:36.800
<v Speaker 1>of pure carbon that you've just created and you shoot

0:21:37.440 --> 0:21:41.480
<v Speaker 1>a beam of energy through it, a lot of energy. Yeah,

0:21:41.840 --> 0:21:45.800
<v Speaker 1>like two million volts, which is a lot, just all

0:21:45.960 --> 0:21:47.800
<v Speaker 1>once I think they ramp it up, don't they, Yeah,

0:21:47.880 --> 0:21:50.560
<v Speaker 1>over time, but at some point it's got it's it's

0:21:50.600 --> 0:21:55.760
<v Speaker 1>been accelerated to two million volts of energy, okay. And

0:21:55.800 --> 0:21:58.159
<v Speaker 1>then so once you have this thing basically a particle

0:21:58.280 --> 0:22:02.760
<v Speaker 1>mini particle accelerators pass through a spectrometer which can actually

0:22:02.840 --> 0:22:08.160
<v Speaker 1>measure the different masses of the atoms in this beam

0:22:08.200 --> 0:22:11.240
<v Speaker 1>that you've shot through the graphite. That's right, it's detecting

0:22:11.280 --> 0:22:14.560
<v Speaker 1>the little bits of carbon. Yeah, that's pretty impressive stuff.

0:22:15.000 --> 0:22:16.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this is the kind this is the level

0:22:16.680 --> 0:22:19.080
<v Speaker 1>of technology we're at right now in two thousand nineteen,

0:22:19.080 --> 0:22:21.360
<v Speaker 1>and this has been around since like the eighties or nineties.

0:22:21.760 --> 0:22:24.040
<v Speaker 1>Just think of what's coming next. What do they use

0:22:24.160 --> 0:22:29.520
<v Speaker 1>Before the spectrometer, they used something beta counting, and it

0:22:29.600 --> 0:22:32.720
<v Speaker 1>was clunky and expensive and not nearly as reliable. But

0:22:32.840 --> 0:22:35.800
<v Speaker 1>basically what it did was something different where it would

0:22:35.800 --> 0:22:40.840
<v Speaker 1>sit there and and study a piece of graphite or gas.

0:22:40.960 --> 0:22:44.680
<v Speaker 1>They often gasify stuff to pure gas, and then it

0:22:44.720 --> 0:22:46.720
<v Speaker 1>would just like shoot a beam through and study I

0:22:46.720 --> 0:22:50.399
<v Speaker 1>think a beam. It would somehow study the sample for

0:22:50.720 --> 0:22:55.520
<v Speaker 1>days maybe, and it would count the number of atoms

0:22:55.720 --> 0:23:01.159
<v Speaker 1>that had spontaneously converted from carbon four team new carbon twelve,

0:23:01.600 --> 0:23:03.879
<v Speaker 1>and then it would do a little mathematic rigamarole and

0:23:03.920 --> 0:23:06.560
<v Speaker 1>say this is how this is how at this rate

0:23:06.560 --> 0:23:08.880
<v Speaker 1>of decay, this is how old this organism is. Well,

0:23:08.880 --> 0:23:11.560
<v Speaker 1>thank goodness, we have the spectrometer now then, because it's

0:23:11.640 --> 0:23:15.320
<v Speaker 1>much more precise and it sounds more futuristic too. Yeah,

0:23:15.359 --> 0:23:20.240
<v Speaker 1>mass pectrometers. So you're gonna shoot this beam, you're gonna

0:23:20.480 --> 0:23:22.840
<v Speaker 1>throw it in the Wonder machine. Actually not the Wonder machine,

0:23:22.920 --> 0:23:28.360
<v Speaker 1>We've already taken that. Yeah, it's a thoughtless piece of crap. Fight. Uh.

0:23:28.400 --> 0:23:32.160
<v Speaker 1>And then you compare that ratio to the again year zero,

0:23:32.280 --> 0:23:37.640
<v Speaker 1>which is the ratio in which is still a little confusing. Yeah,

0:23:37.640 --> 0:23:41.959
<v Speaker 1>it's clunky, It is very clunky. And then that difference, basically,

0:23:42.119 --> 0:23:45.359
<v Speaker 1>like we've said eight times now, shows how many years

0:23:45.359 --> 0:23:49.400
<v Speaker 1>have passed to produce the amount of decay in that sample. Right,

0:23:49.800 --> 0:23:52.520
<v Speaker 1>So if you took like a sample of wood from

0:23:52.520 --> 0:23:55.800
<v Speaker 1>an old ship, an old boat, you found out right,

0:23:57.200 --> 0:23:58.960
<v Speaker 1>that's the new right by the way, did you say

0:23:59.040 --> 0:24:03.040
<v Speaker 1>route yeah? Um? And you analyze and you found that

0:24:03.320 --> 0:24:06.720
<v Speaker 1>based on the amount of carbon fourteen in there, it

0:24:06.840 --> 0:24:10.640
<v Speaker 1>was something like, um, it dated to like eight hundred

0:24:10.600 --> 0:24:14.240
<v Speaker 1>and forty five b C E. Okay, you'd be like, great,

0:24:14.280 --> 0:24:16.560
<v Speaker 1>now we know where this ship is from. But if

0:24:16.600 --> 0:24:18.920
<v Speaker 1>you try to go out and publish a study with that,

0:24:19.160 --> 0:24:22.320
<v Speaker 1>hopefully your radio carbon colleagues would be like, whoa, whoa,

0:24:22.560 --> 0:24:25.200
<v Speaker 1>there's a few more steps involved here here, and that's

0:24:25.200 --> 0:24:27.680
<v Speaker 1>like the most precise radio carbon date anyone would have

0:24:27.680 --> 0:24:30.160
<v Speaker 1>ever given. You'll be laughed out of the field if

0:24:30.160 --> 0:24:33.439
<v Speaker 1>you do this instead. There's a couple of things that

0:24:33.480 --> 0:24:35.960
<v Speaker 1>you have to do first. So radio carbon dates are

0:24:36.080 --> 0:24:40.720
<v Speaker 1>given uh as a span of time, a bit of

0:24:40.760 --> 0:24:44.560
<v Speaker 1>a range, right, so it'll say. And also because it's

0:24:44.960 --> 0:24:49.439
<v Speaker 1>comparing to it's given not as a date like B

0:24:49.600 --> 0:24:51.840
<v Speaker 1>C E or a D or C E or anything

0:24:51.880 --> 0:24:56.000
<v Speaker 1>like that. It's BP before president years before president. So

0:24:56.119 --> 0:24:58.920
<v Speaker 1>for that piece of wood, say, you would actually get

0:24:59.000 --> 0:25:02.600
<v Speaker 1>something like twenty seven hundred and fifteen years before present

0:25:02.800 --> 0:25:05.920
<v Speaker 1>plus or minus thirty years. So is it always thirty

0:25:06.040 --> 0:25:08.040
<v Speaker 1>or is it no? No, it can can depend, it

0:25:08.080 --> 0:25:14.000
<v Speaker 1>can it can range dramatically like Leotsie is there. They

0:25:14.040 --> 0:25:16.080
<v Speaker 1>have them down to about three hundred or three hundred

0:25:16.080 --> 0:25:20.719
<v Speaker 1>and fifty years, And you like the shorter the span

0:25:20.800 --> 0:25:24.080
<v Speaker 1>of time, the plus or minus years or the window

0:25:24.160 --> 0:25:28.080
<v Speaker 1>of years that you get, um, the less confidence you have.

0:25:28.280 --> 0:25:31.920
<v Speaker 1>So maybe you'll have like twenty six percent confidence that

0:25:32.320 --> 0:25:37.800
<v Speaker 1>it's from you know, uh, eight hundred forty five BC

0:25:38.080 --> 0:25:42.200
<v Speaker 1>to eight hundred fifty five BC, but you have confidence

0:25:42.280 --> 0:25:45.320
<v Speaker 1>that there's like this two hundred year span it's somewhere

0:25:45.320 --> 0:25:47.280
<v Speaker 1>and there. That makes sense because I have a million

0:25:47.280 --> 0:25:50.200
<v Speaker 1>percent confidence that it's somewhere within the last eighteen million

0:25:50.280 --> 0:25:53.560
<v Speaker 1>years exactly exactly right. So it just keeps. The larger

0:25:53.600 --> 0:25:56.480
<v Speaker 1>the window, the more confident you are. But I mean

0:25:56.520 --> 0:25:59.960
<v Speaker 1>still you're talking a hundred two hundred years depending on

0:26:00.119 --> 0:26:02.159
<v Speaker 1>how old the sample is, how good the sample is,

0:26:02.480 --> 0:26:06.359
<v Speaker 1>so it's still pretty it's pretty um. They can zero

0:26:06.400 --> 0:26:09.159
<v Speaker 1>it in pretty well. And that sciences job is to

0:26:09.240 --> 0:26:12.160
<v Speaker 1>not say, well, let's just make a really big range

0:26:12.680 --> 0:26:14.840
<v Speaker 1>and that will be good enough. They want a zero

0:26:14.840 --> 0:26:18.040
<v Speaker 1>and as much as possible, Like you know, that's and

0:26:18.119 --> 0:26:20.959
<v Speaker 1>still be accurate. So the thing is, though, is if

0:26:21.000 --> 0:26:23.199
<v Speaker 1>you do the if you do the math, and you say, well,

0:26:23.200 --> 0:26:27.479
<v Speaker 1>wait a minute, your example, Yeah, fifteen years before present

0:26:27.480 --> 0:26:30.359
<v Speaker 1>plus or minus thirty years gives you a range of

0:26:30.440 --> 0:26:34.160
<v Speaker 1>between seven hundred and twenty six and six sixty six BC.

0:26:34.880 --> 0:26:37.160
<v Speaker 1>But that's not even close to what you said, yeah,

0:26:37.200 --> 0:26:42.119
<v Speaker 1>which was before right, Yeah, so why wouldn't be in

0:26:42.160 --> 0:26:47.760
<v Speaker 1>the sample? Chuck? Because uh, like we said in the

0:26:47.840 --> 0:26:52.439
<v Speaker 1>very first sentence, radio carbon dating is uh not super

0:26:52.880 --> 0:26:55.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's accurate on a wide range, but it's

0:26:55.480 --> 0:26:58.640
<v Speaker 1>a little clunky. It is. Part of it is because

0:26:58.800 --> 0:27:07.000
<v Speaker 1>there's actual um problems, like known problems built in to

0:27:07.160 --> 0:27:09.960
<v Speaker 1>the actual process of radio carbon dating and the results

0:27:09.960 --> 0:27:13.240
<v Speaker 1>that they get back. I'll put that, I'll put that pause.

0:27:13.280 --> 0:27:17.199
<v Speaker 1>I just had sounded really long in the replay, probably

0:27:17.240 --> 0:27:19.320
<v Speaker 1>so I felt like it. But yeah, let's take a break, man,

0:27:19.400 --> 0:27:21.680
<v Speaker 1>all right, We'll come right back and talk about more

0:27:21.720 --> 0:27:38.119
<v Speaker 1>science right after this. So I thought this was was

0:27:38.160 --> 0:27:40.720
<v Speaker 1>this from how stuff works and you in your brain

0:27:40.920 --> 0:27:43.159
<v Speaker 1>and yeah and a bunch of other places too, and

0:27:43.320 --> 0:27:47.840
<v Speaker 1>you in your brain. Okay, but there there's an interesting

0:27:48.359 --> 0:27:51.360
<v Speaker 1>thing to note here, which is science makes a lot

0:27:51.400 --> 0:27:55.320
<v Speaker 1>of assumptions when it comes to dating stuff. Uh, and

0:27:55.440 --> 0:27:57.440
<v Speaker 1>this is the best way to say it. If you find,

0:27:57.960 --> 0:28:00.119
<v Speaker 1>like if they find like a leather shield that they

0:28:00.160 --> 0:28:03.840
<v Speaker 1>dig out of an archaeological site, they get super excited

0:28:04.200 --> 0:28:07.840
<v Speaker 1>and they can date the shield and they can say,

0:28:07.960 --> 0:28:11.840
<v Speaker 1>or they probably will say, well, whoever this heroic person

0:28:11.920 --> 0:28:15.640
<v Speaker 1>was in the battlefield died on this around this date,

0:28:15.680 --> 0:28:18.560
<v Speaker 1>because that's where the shield was dated from. But that

0:28:19.080 --> 0:28:22.080
<v Speaker 1>is not necessarily true because they're dating the shield from

0:28:22.119 --> 0:28:26.439
<v Speaker 1>the cow skin that's on the handle, let's say, and

0:28:26.520 --> 0:28:29.480
<v Speaker 1>that just says when that cow is alive. Lass has

0:28:29.560 --> 0:28:32.240
<v Speaker 1>nothing to do with when this person made the shield.

0:28:32.600 --> 0:28:35.359
<v Speaker 1>How long that leather had been around before they went

0:28:35.400 --> 0:28:38.080
<v Speaker 1>out onto the battlefield and took an arrow to the forehead. Yeah,

0:28:38.120 --> 0:28:41.320
<v Speaker 1>maybe they were like super into vintage leather to use

0:28:41.400 --> 0:28:44.960
<v Speaker 1>on their shield handle here. It's it's sounds ridiculous, but

0:28:44.960 --> 0:28:49.240
<v Speaker 1>it's also possible. But the thing is is archaeological or

0:28:49.440 --> 0:28:53.920
<v Speaker 1>archaeology is based on making assumptions and presumptions based on

0:28:53.960 --> 0:28:57.160
<v Speaker 1>the context. And it's like, this is totally fine, this

0:28:57.240 --> 0:28:59.840
<v Speaker 1>is widely accepted. This is not new or scandalous at all,

0:28:59.880 --> 0:29:02.400
<v Speaker 1>but like that is part of archaeology's job. As you say,

0:29:02.440 --> 0:29:05.720
<v Speaker 1>here's the context of this find. And based on this

0:29:05.840 --> 0:29:08.520
<v Speaker 1>radiocarbon date of this, it's a pretty good guess that

0:29:08.560 --> 0:29:11.440
<v Speaker 1>they killed the cow, made the leather, made the shield,

0:29:11.640 --> 0:29:15.360
<v Speaker 1>and the guy died probably within a ten fifteen year window.

0:29:15.880 --> 0:29:18.240
<v Speaker 1>And I mean the idea it would be an even

0:29:18.280 --> 0:29:21.200
<v Speaker 1>weirder assumption to think that it was an ancient hipster

0:29:21.240 --> 0:29:24.760
<v Speaker 1>who collected old hold leathers. Right, check out my new

0:29:25.680 --> 0:29:28.040
<v Speaker 1>that's right. And then the other part of it too

0:29:28.120 --> 0:29:30.400
<v Speaker 1>is they also use it to compare to other stuff.

0:29:30.440 --> 0:29:33.520
<v Speaker 1>Like if they're in a pit filled with other um

0:29:33.720 --> 0:29:37.320
<v Speaker 1>soldiers of a certain you know, from a certain nation

0:29:37.480 --> 0:29:40.840
<v Speaker 1>or clan or whatever, um, and they knew of a

0:29:40.880 --> 0:29:43.240
<v Speaker 1>lost grade, they may have found that if it kind

0:29:43.240 --> 0:29:45.640
<v Speaker 1>of roughly correlates to the date. They were thinking, Like,

0:29:45.680 --> 0:29:47.560
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of a lot of stuff that they

0:29:47.560 --> 0:29:49.840
<v Speaker 1>put together. They don't just say, here's what the radio

0:29:49.880 --> 0:29:52.200
<v Speaker 1>carbon date says, so this is what it is. That's right.

0:29:52.760 --> 0:29:55.840
<v Speaker 1>So because science does this, Libby was certainly doing this.

0:29:55.960 --> 0:29:58.360
<v Speaker 1>The wild man was doing this, and he was making

0:29:58.400 --> 0:30:01.840
<v Speaker 1>assumptions and he was and hey, we're not knocking the

0:30:01.880 --> 0:30:04.640
<v Speaker 1>guy because he want a Nobel prize for this, but

0:30:04.760 --> 0:30:07.880
<v Speaker 1>he assumed a couple of things that were not correct. Uh,

0:30:08.080 --> 0:30:10.520
<v Speaker 1>One of which was he got the half life wrong. Yeah,

0:30:10.920 --> 0:30:13.880
<v Speaker 1>he said the half life of carbon fourteen was five thousand,

0:30:13.880 --> 0:30:17.560
<v Speaker 1>five D sixty eight years. We actually know it's fifty

0:30:17.880 --> 0:30:23.200
<v Speaker 1>thirty like we said. And he also presumed that carbon

0:30:23.240 --> 0:30:28.400
<v Speaker 1>fourteen in the atmosphere is very steady over time and

0:30:28.440 --> 0:30:31.400
<v Speaker 1>it's something we can really depend on, being like they're

0:30:31.440 --> 0:30:34.320
<v Speaker 1>being a certain amount. And that's not really the case either. No,

0:30:34.440 --> 0:30:36.360
<v Speaker 1>it's not that second one is a big one. Like

0:30:36.400 --> 0:30:38.200
<v Speaker 1>the first one. You can just mess around with some

0:30:38.280 --> 0:30:40.680
<v Speaker 1>math and be like, okay, well this is the actual

0:30:40.800 --> 0:30:43.640
<v Speaker 1>half life. Well, but it's interesting. That's what we've had

0:30:43.680 --> 0:30:46.040
<v Speaker 1>to do because that's another thing we didn't go back

0:30:46.280 --> 0:30:49.240
<v Speaker 1>and change because it was all done on the basis

0:30:49.280 --> 0:30:54.560
<v Speaker 1>of right. Right. So the initial stuff, the initial dates

0:30:54.640 --> 0:30:56.920
<v Speaker 1>that were done when Libby invented it, were based on

0:30:56.960 --> 0:31:03.480
<v Speaker 1>a half life from right but from uh, I don't

0:31:03.760 --> 0:31:05.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't know exactly when they figured it out, but

0:31:05.640 --> 0:31:08.120
<v Speaker 1>at some point in the ensuing decades they figured out, no,

0:31:08.280 --> 0:31:11.800
<v Speaker 1>the half life is actually fifty thirty and rather than

0:31:11.880 --> 0:31:16.320
<v Speaker 1>just go back and re read um uh analyze the

0:31:16.320 --> 0:31:19.880
<v Speaker 1>old samples which actually may have been destroyed by this time. Uh,

0:31:19.920 --> 0:31:22.440
<v Speaker 1>they said, we're just going to stick with this convention

0:31:22.480 --> 0:31:24.680
<v Speaker 1>and follow it, and we could just do the math

0:31:25.280 --> 0:31:27.720
<v Speaker 1>and just say, actually, this is the real half life

0:31:28.200 --> 0:31:32.720
<v Speaker 1>converted to the libyhalf life, and then have a radiocarbon date. Yeah.

0:31:32.760 --> 0:31:34.560
<v Speaker 1>But the other thing he got wrong, like you said,

0:31:34.640 --> 0:31:37.800
<v Speaker 1>is is the bigger problem because it can't just be

0:31:37.840 --> 0:31:42.120
<v Speaker 1>solved with math, and that is his presumption that uh,

0:31:42.400 --> 0:31:45.520
<v Speaker 1>carbon fourteen in the upper atmosphere is produced at a

0:31:45.560 --> 0:31:48.360
<v Speaker 1>steady rate. We know now that they are all kinds

0:31:48.400 --> 0:31:51.400
<v Speaker 1>of things that can and have affected that rate over

0:31:51.400 --> 0:31:56.040
<v Speaker 1>the years, everything from ocean currents to super volcanoes, two

0:31:56.040 --> 0:32:00.680
<v Speaker 1>solar flares, to the Earth's magnetic field. It is fluctuated

0:32:00.800 --> 0:32:03.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot over time. Yeah, but I mean from year

0:32:03.480 --> 0:32:05.959
<v Speaker 1>to year, we're starting to find that it's not at

0:32:05.960 --> 0:32:09.240
<v Speaker 1>all study. And that's a big one because one of

0:32:09.240 --> 0:32:13.760
<v Speaker 1>the foundations of radiocarbon dating is this idea that that

0:32:13.960 --> 0:32:17.080
<v Speaker 1>it's like a reliable clock that just starts clicking backwards.

0:32:17.240 --> 0:32:19.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, at any point in time, whatever year you

0:32:20.040 --> 0:32:22.160
<v Speaker 1>come in on you're going to be able to compare

0:32:22.200 --> 0:32:26.040
<v Speaker 1>it to a modern sample and get a coherent UM

0:32:26.600 --> 0:32:30.080
<v Speaker 1>radiocarbon date that will make sense. That's just absolutely not

0:32:30.120 --> 0:32:33.360
<v Speaker 1>the case because of all of those fluctuations, Right, That's

0:32:33.360 --> 0:32:37.360
<v Speaker 1>something that this field is definitely grappling with, which uh

0:32:37.560 --> 0:32:40.320
<v Speaker 1>it will it will be able to overcome and largely

0:32:40.400 --> 0:32:43.680
<v Speaker 1>has already because they use other types of dating to

0:32:43.920 --> 0:32:47.320
<v Speaker 1>calibrate their radiocarbon dates. Yeah, which is really cool. We

0:32:47.320 --> 0:32:53.360
<v Speaker 1>were talking about the um relative dating of carbon fourteen dating.

0:32:54.080 --> 0:32:56.080
<v Speaker 1>What they're now trying to do, who not now they've

0:32:56.080 --> 0:32:58.479
<v Speaker 1>been doing it for a while is absolute dating, like

0:32:58.480 --> 0:33:02.200
<v Speaker 1>what you're talking about, comparing it to own quantities. And

0:33:02.280 --> 0:33:05.040
<v Speaker 1>one of those is tree rings. And I'm surprised we've

0:33:05.040 --> 0:33:06.800
<v Speaker 1>talked about tree rings a little bit here and there,

0:33:07.560 --> 0:33:09.800
<v Speaker 1>but I wonder if it could be a shorty on

0:33:09.840 --> 0:33:14.880
<v Speaker 1>its own at least Yeah, maybe more. We'll just start

0:33:14.920 --> 0:33:18.120
<v Speaker 1>wrapping on it and whether if it turns into a

0:33:18.160 --> 0:33:20.760
<v Speaker 1>real deal episode we'll go with, we'll just cancel our

0:33:20.800 --> 0:33:26.520
<v Speaker 1>dinner plans keep going. But tree ring dating is called

0:33:26.960 --> 0:33:32.800
<v Speaker 1>dendo chronology counting tree rings, and not all trees have

0:33:32.920 --> 0:33:35.480
<v Speaker 1>tree rings. Will get to that, which can be a problem,

0:33:35.520 --> 0:33:37.160
<v Speaker 1>but a lot of them do and some of them

0:33:37.200 --> 0:33:40.680
<v Speaker 1>grow every year, just like you learned, and everyone probably

0:33:40.680 --> 0:33:43.400
<v Speaker 1>thinks it's true from like kids science class. It's like

0:33:43.520 --> 0:33:45.239
<v Speaker 1>once a year a tree has a ring, so if

0:33:45.240 --> 0:33:46.840
<v Speaker 1>you cut a tree down, you can just count the

0:33:46.880 --> 0:33:48.720
<v Speaker 1>rings and know how old it is, which is I

0:33:48.760 --> 0:33:52.560
<v Speaker 1>mean basically right, depending on the tree is exactly. But

0:33:52.760 --> 0:33:56.360
<v Speaker 1>here's the thing is, trees absorbed that carbon fourteen just

0:33:56.440 --> 0:33:59.520
<v Speaker 1>like everything else, but those tree rings don't. Once they

0:33:59.520 --> 0:34:03.760
<v Speaker 1>have completed a tree ring cycle, that tree ring is

0:34:03.880 --> 0:34:06.920
<v Speaker 1>essentially dead inside the tree and is not accepting any

0:34:06.920 --> 0:34:09.680
<v Speaker 1>more carbon fourteen. Yeah, it's like a fossil. It's like

0:34:09.719 --> 0:34:12.160
<v Speaker 1>if you look at the outside of a tree, that's

0:34:12.239 --> 0:34:14.560
<v Speaker 1>the living part. Like as big as a tree is

0:34:14.680 --> 0:34:17.160
<v Speaker 1>and enormous as it is, the actual living part of

0:34:17.200 --> 0:34:19.880
<v Speaker 1>it is just this outside veneer and like the leaves

0:34:19.880 --> 0:34:23.480
<v Speaker 1>and everything. Right, yeah, everything inside is what used to

0:34:23.480 --> 0:34:26.160
<v Speaker 1>be outside but is now inside because a new ring

0:34:26.200 --> 0:34:28.799
<v Speaker 1>of growth grew around it. So um, since it's not

0:34:28.880 --> 0:34:31.920
<v Speaker 1>taking in any more carbon, it's like a snapshot of

0:34:31.960 --> 0:34:36.239
<v Speaker 1>the carbon fourteen that was in the atmosphere the year

0:34:36.320 --> 0:34:38.960
<v Speaker 1>that tree ring grew. Yes, and we know this, and

0:34:39.000 --> 0:34:42.560
<v Speaker 1>now we have something to compare against those Carbon fourteen

0:34:42.640 --> 0:34:46.200
<v Speaker 1>data results. Yeah, because if you chop the tree down today,

0:34:46.520 --> 0:34:50.640
<v Speaker 1>you would say thank you father tree, mother tree, um,

0:34:50.719 --> 0:34:54.080
<v Speaker 1>for sacrificing your life for for science. That's what you

0:34:54.120 --> 0:34:57.520
<v Speaker 1>have to say first. Um, And you start counting the

0:34:57.560 --> 0:35:01.040
<v Speaker 1>tree rings backwards. If you it to another tree that's

0:35:01.120 --> 0:35:05.680
<v Speaker 1>much older, but that lived that the lifetime of which

0:35:05.719 --> 0:35:08.600
<v Speaker 1>overlapped with the tree you just cut down, you can

0:35:08.640 --> 0:35:12.799
<v Speaker 1>eventually jump over from the tree you just cut down

0:35:12.800 --> 0:35:15.440
<v Speaker 1>to this older tree and keep counting backwards and then

0:35:15.480 --> 0:35:18.680
<v Speaker 1>just keep if you find enough old trees, keep leaping

0:35:19.000 --> 0:35:21.640
<v Speaker 1>from tree to tree, counting tree rings as if it

0:35:21.719 --> 0:35:25.120
<v Speaker 1>was one big old tree. That's really cool. It is,

0:35:25.200 --> 0:35:27.800
<v Speaker 1>and there are very very old trees that do exist

0:35:27.840 --> 0:35:32.160
<v Speaker 1>on Earth that you can count backwards from over very

0:35:32.160 --> 0:35:36.240
<v Speaker 1>long spans of time. But you can also use multiple trees. Yeah.

0:35:36.280 --> 0:35:39.520
<v Speaker 1>And like if you're sitting at home or in your car, thinking, well,

0:35:39.520 --> 0:35:41.600
<v Speaker 1>why don't they just find the oldest tree and go there,

0:35:42.200 --> 0:35:44.560
<v Speaker 1>Like you want that overlap because you want a complete

0:35:44.560 --> 0:35:47.880
<v Speaker 1>record because stuff you're dating might fall. You know in

0:35:47.960 --> 0:35:51.560
<v Speaker 1>that that they need everything to fall in that range, right,

0:35:51.760 --> 0:35:55.840
<v Speaker 1>And so this has been extremely helpful for radio carbon

0:35:55.920 --> 0:35:59.880
<v Speaker 1>dating because they have managed to compile basically a library

0:36:00.080 --> 0:36:03.520
<v Speaker 1>of tree ring data UM going back like fourteen thousand,

0:36:03.560 --> 0:36:06.600
<v Speaker 1>five hundred years. It's amazing. It's called the Holocene tree record,

0:36:07.080 --> 0:36:09.240
<v Speaker 1>and it's one of the I didn't even know it existed.

0:36:09.320 --> 0:36:11.839
<v Speaker 1>Now I'm just I love it. Yeah, it's pretty cool.

0:36:11.880 --> 0:36:16.319
<v Speaker 1>I want to I like wanta a bound copy of

0:36:16.320 --> 0:36:19.120
<v Speaker 1>it for the coffee table or something and lay in

0:36:19.160 --> 0:36:21.960
<v Speaker 1>a hammock in the middle of Pando and read it

0:36:22.000 --> 0:36:24.760
<v Speaker 1>and read it and be like, oh, look at this year, Pando,

0:36:24.880 --> 0:36:27.280
<v Speaker 1>what do you think what happened this year? And Panda

0:36:27.320 --> 0:36:30.879
<v Speaker 1>would hug you. Uh so I was trying to think

0:36:30.880 --> 0:36:33.840
<v Speaker 1>of something you would do back to Pando, but I

0:36:33.840 --> 0:36:38.760
<v Speaker 1>would go glow and Panda's leaves. But that feels good. Sure.

0:36:39.480 --> 0:36:41.880
<v Speaker 1>So there are other places in nature that have the

0:36:41.960 --> 0:36:44.960
<v Speaker 1>same kind of snapshots. Uh, if you wanted more than

0:36:45.280 --> 0:36:49.000
<v Speaker 1>because you need more just than the Holocene tree record. Uh,

0:36:49.040 --> 0:36:51.520
<v Speaker 1>they can use coral reef because there's clearly carbon in

0:36:51.560 --> 0:36:55.719
<v Speaker 1>the ocean um still actites and stillagmites, which are called

0:36:55.840 --> 0:36:59.280
<v Speaker 1>spelio thembs through whenever busts out out at a party,

0:36:59.600 --> 0:37:03.680
<v Speaker 1>you'll know they're talking about. Yeah, you probably should, because

0:37:03.719 --> 0:37:05.480
<v Speaker 1>everyone else is just going to be talking about I

0:37:05.520 --> 0:37:08.520
<v Speaker 1>can never remember which ones are exactly. Oh you mean,

0:37:09.560 --> 0:37:13.399
<v Speaker 1>just let me educate you. Goodbye. Uh. They are made

0:37:13.400 --> 0:37:16.200
<v Speaker 1>of carbon and they are deposited in layers, just like

0:37:16.239 --> 0:37:19.080
<v Speaker 1>the tree rings in the coral uh. In fact, they

0:37:19.080 --> 0:37:22.120
<v Speaker 1>have found some in China kind of recently. They go

0:37:22.200 --> 0:37:26.800
<v Speaker 1>back fifty four thousand years. Yeah. I think they really

0:37:26.840 --> 0:37:28.799
<v Speaker 1>recently found this so much so that hasn't been like

0:37:28.840 --> 0:37:31.640
<v Speaker 1>fully vetted, but they were super excited about it. That

0:37:31.920 --> 0:37:36.640
<v Speaker 1>the idea that it gave a basically a long mineral

0:37:37.040 --> 0:37:41.839
<v Speaker 1>rich tree ring library of fifty four thousand years of

0:37:41.880 --> 0:37:46.080
<v Speaker 1>the carbon fourteen concentrations in the atmosphere. If they if

0:37:46.080 --> 0:37:48.120
<v Speaker 1>it does pan out, that would be amazing. And what's

0:37:48.160 --> 0:37:52.040
<v Speaker 1>the deal with the lake in Japan? It reliably puts

0:37:52.040 --> 0:37:54.640
<v Speaker 1>down a new layer of sediment every six months. That's

0:37:54.640 --> 0:37:58.440
<v Speaker 1>pretty cool. Yeah. And so they've taken core samples and

0:37:58.480 --> 0:38:02.040
<v Speaker 1>in these core samples they've turned up like leaves trapped

0:38:02.040 --> 0:38:05.600
<v Speaker 1>in single layers and something like six hundred and fifty

0:38:05.680 --> 0:38:10.360
<v Speaker 1>different spots. So all they have to do is count backwards,

0:38:11.120 --> 0:38:14.600
<v Speaker 1>find you know, the and they'll know the year that

0:38:14.640 --> 0:38:19.960
<v Speaker 1>this UM leaf is trapped in and then test the

0:38:20.000 --> 0:38:22.279
<v Speaker 1>carbon fourteen and the leaf and you've got like a

0:38:22.280 --> 0:38:25.359
<v Speaker 1>picture right there. And that is called what we'll call

0:38:26.239 --> 0:38:31.360
<v Speaker 1>a library of atmospheric carbon fourteen concentrations. Yeah, they should

0:38:31.360 --> 0:38:34.440
<v Speaker 1>have a name. It does. It's called ink COW I

0:38:34.680 --> 0:38:37.799
<v Speaker 1>N T C A and UM. There's different programs that

0:38:37.880 --> 0:38:40.400
<v Speaker 1>you can run all this through like before, back in

0:38:40.440 --> 0:38:43.319
<v Speaker 1>the forties and fifties, like they were, I guess, using

0:38:43.320 --> 0:38:46.560
<v Speaker 1>slide rules and stuff like this to come up with these.

0:38:46.600 --> 0:38:51.120
<v Speaker 1>Now we have basically machine learning algorithms running these these

0:38:51.120 --> 0:38:54.839
<v Speaker 1>computations for us. But UM, they have programs that use

0:38:54.960 --> 0:38:59.360
<v Speaker 1>this calibration library to basically say, here's the what the

0:38:59.480 --> 0:39:03.160
<v Speaker 1>radio harbon date is saying. What does this library of

0:39:03.280 --> 0:39:07.040
<v Speaker 1>absolute dates say? And then what they do is they actually, well,

0:39:07.080 --> 0:39:10.360
<v Speaker 1>the computer I should say, overlaps what's called the wiggles.

0:39:10.520 --> 0:39:13.359
<v Speaker 1>They hold it up to the light yea, and they

0:39:13.400 --> 0:39:16.160
<v Speaker 1>find like where these kind of wiggles overlap, which are

0:39:16.600 --> 0:39:21.279
<v Speaker 1>UM confidence intervals I guess, uh, and where it's most

0:39:21.320 --> 0:39:25.040
<v Speaker 1>confident that you have a pretty good idea of what

0:39:25.239 --> 0:39:28.440
<v Speaker 1>the range is for the age of this sample. And

0:39:28.520 --> 0:39:32.040
<v Speaker 1>that means we know exactly how old everything is always

0:39:32.280 --> 0:39:35.759
<v Speaker 1>all right precisely to the day. That is not true

0:39:35.960 --> 0:39:39.480
<v Speaker 1>because all the things we just mentioned, the spile, thems,

0:39:40.600 --> 0:39:46.439
<v Speaker 1>the coral, everything has its own individual problems, right. Um.

0:39:46.520 --> 0:39:51.000
<v Speaker 1>Coral turns out isn't a great material for calibrating this

0:39:51.080 --> 0:39:56.439
<v Speaker 1>stuff because ocean concentrations of carbon are not the same

0:39:56.480 --> 0:39:59.080
<v Speaker 1>as in the atmosphere. So that kind of throws it

0:39:59.120 --> 0:40:02.160
<v Speaker 1>off right there. It So if you're comparing like something

0:40:02.200 --> 0:40:06.040
<v Speaker 1>that lived on land to coral in the library in

0:40:06.600 --> 0:40:09.040
<v Speaker 1>cal library, yeah, it's not gonna it's not gonna calibrate

0:40:09.120 --> 0:40:12.839
<v Speaker 1>very well. Um. Tree rings are a problem too, because

0:40:12.920 --> 0:40:17.040
<v Speaker 1>they figured out that depending on the hemisphere that the

0:40:17.120 --> 0:40:19.919
<v Speaker 1>tree grew in, it will give you a different atmospheric

0:40:19.960 --> 0:40:24.160
<v Speaker 1>concentration because the southern atmosphere has more oceans and those

0:40:24.200 --> 0:40:28.680
<v Speaker 1>oceans absorb more carbon dioxide. So there's actually less carbon

0:40:28.760 --> 0:40:32.879
<v Speaker 1>fourteen on the land in the southern hemisphere than there

0:40:32.960 --> 0:40:35.680
<v Speaker 1>is in the northern hemisphere. So if you checked out

0:40:35.680 --> 0:40:39.799
<v Speaker 1>a water logged oak that grew in Ireland and two

0:40:39.920 --> 0:40:47.080
<v Speaker 1>c e if you found a cody tree the Cody

0:40:47.320 --> 0:40:50.520
<v Speaker 1>tree in New Zealand that grew that same year, they

0:40:50.520 --> 0:40:53.920
<v Speaker 1>would have different radio carbon dates because they have different

0:40:53.920 --> 0:40:57.799
<v Speaker 1>carbon radiocarbon concentrations. So it's just there's a lot of

0:40:57.840 --> 0:41:01.520
<v Speaker 1>things confounding this stuff that's keeping it and being less precise,

0:41:02.000 --> 0:41:04.960
<v Speaker 1>that's right. And it gets even worse because there have

0:41:05.040 --> 0:41:09.040
<v Speaker 1>been long stretches of time on Earth in our history

0:41:09.080 --> 0:41:14.799
<v Speaker 1>where carbon fourteen production really increased every year over you know,

0:41:15.040 --> 0:41:18.839
<v Speaker 1>hundreds of thousands of years or tens of thousands. Yeah,

0:41:18.920 --> 0:41:23.880
<v Speaker 1>well there's stretches that. So all over the radio carbon calendar,

0:41:24.640 --> 0:41:27.600
<v Speaker 1>there are these things called plateaus, and I think the

0:41:27.680 --> 0:41:30.600
<v Speaker 1>longest that they've ever found is a few hundred years.

0:41:30.760 --> 0:41:33.920
<v Speaker 1>When I said tens of thousands, just like a radio

0:41:33.960 --> 0:41:36.880
<v Speaker 1>carbon date, all right, it feel so bad. They found

0:41:36.880 --> 0:41:41.480
<v Speaker 1>this thing called the Hallstock plateau, more like the Hallstat disaster. Yeah,

0:41:41.480 --> 0:41:43.319
<v Speaker 1>that's what some people call them, all right, I'm sure

0:41:43.320 --> 0:41:46.040
<v Speaker 1>that's what Willard Libby called that. Sure, But basically there

0:41:46.040 --> 0:41:50.000
<v Speaker 1>were periods during Earth's history, This one in particular goes

0:41:50.040 --> 0:41:56.520
<v Speaker 1>from seven sixty four b C where the the production

0:41:56.800 --> 0:42:01.240
<v Speaker 1>of carbon fourteen in the atmosphere just in priest basically

0:42:01.280 --> 0:42:05.759
<v Speaker 1>steadily steadily every year, so nothing ever got older relative

0:42:05.840 --> 0:42:10.000
<v Speaker 1>to new stuff, right, which means that if you radio

0:42:10.080 --> 0:42:13.279
<v Speaker 1>carbon date something at the in seven sixty b C

0:42:14.520 --> 0:42:17.000
<v Speaker 1>and something in four twenty BC, they're going to give

0:42:17.000 --> 0:42:21.239
<v Speaker 1>you the same exact radio carbon date. Does that make

0:42:21.280 --> 0:42:29.200
<v Speaker 1>sense for that was your response. Hey, there's people out

0:42:29.239 --> 0:42:33.520
<v Speaker 1>there thinking it to the Hallstad disaster. All right, Willard

0:42:33.560 --> 0:42:37.279
<v Speaker 1>Libby would be proud. He was the wild Man. So

0:42:37.680 --> 0:42:40.440
<v Speaker 1>this is why old this is important. It's not just

0:42:40.560 --> 0:42:43.080
<v Speaker 1>to put a date on something so we know how

0:42:43.120 --> 0:42:45.080
<v Speaker 1>old it is and we can just put it down

0:42:45.160 --> 0:42:48.000
<v Speaker 1>in a museum or a history book or whatever. Right. Um,

0:42:48.040 --> 0:42:51.799
<v Speaker 1>it really opens up all of science and all of

0:42:52.719 --> 0:42:56.840
<v Speaker 1>ancient history to interpretation and kind of rock to the

0:42:56.880 --> 0:42:58.839
<v Speaker 1>world about a lot of things that we thought were

0:42:58.880 --> 0:43:01.480
<v Speaker 1>true that are true. Yeah. They call it the radio

0:43:01.520 --> 0:43:06.560
<v Speaker 1>carbon revolution, and like, well, one good example is in

0:43:06.600 --> 0:43:09.600
<v Speaker 1>the UK there we talked about Stonehenge. They used to

0:43:09.640 --> 0:43:14.480
<v Speaker 1>think that Stonehenge was the result of the how do

0:43:14.520 --> 0:43:20.000
<v Speaker 1>you pronounce that missini myceney? I don't know mycen A.

0:43:20.480 --> 0:43:24.360
<v Speaker 1>You'd think I know mice sna. I think it's the

0:43:24.400 --> 0:43:27.480
<v Speaker 1>mycen A civilization in Greece, But the A and the

0:43:27.520 --> 0:43:29.799
<v Speaker 1>E on the end. It's got to do something more

0:43:29.840 --> 0:43:33.319
<v Speaker 1>than like why not just add a Y instead of

0:43:33.320 --> 0:43:35.920
<v Speaker 1>an e. I'm with you, and you know sometimes you

0:43:35.960 --> 0:43:39.880
<v Speaker 1>see the A and the E together conjoined, like Ronnie

0:43:39.920 --> 0:43:44.960
<v Speaker 1>and Donnie Galleon. You know. So what is that? It's

0:43:45.000 --> 0:43:48.719
<v Speaker 1>its own thing. So we used to think that came

0:43:48.760 --> 0:43:53.920
<v Speaker 1>from an ancient Greek civilization, but because of radio carbon dating,

0:43:54.400 --> 0:43:56.480
<v Speaker 1>they said no, no, no, no no, no, this is uh,

0:43:56.760 --> 0:43:59.640
<v Speaker 1>we had the age all wrong. And Stonehenge came before

0:43:59.719 --> 0:44:03.480
<v Speaker 1>that ever, happened before the civilization was even there. So

0:44:03.520 --> 0:44:06.359
<v Speaker 1>it really helps clear up a picture of everything from

0:44:06.360 --> 0:44:09.720
<v Speaker 1>Otsy the ice Man to knowing uh that the shroud

0:44:09.760 --> 0:44:13.400
<v Speaker 1>of Turin was only seven years old. Uh. It so

0:44:13.440 --> 0:44:16.320
<v Speaker 1>it can confirm things and it can quh other things.

0:44:16.600 --> 0:44:19.080
<v Speaker 1>Right and then, and the way that they used to

0:44:19.080 --> 0:44:21.920
<v Speaker 1>do it before was they would just kind of dig

0:44:23.040 --> 0:44:26.040
<v Speaker 1>in the earth and turn up artifacts. And because an

0:44:26.120 --> 0:44:30.040
<v Speaker 1>artifact was closer to the ground than another one, it

0:44:30.160 --> 0:44:33.280
<v Speaker 1>just meant it was more recent. That's like as precise

0:44:33.280 --> 0:44:35.839
<v Speaker 1>as they could get. Radio carbon was like, not only

0:44:35.880 --> 0:44:37.440
<v Speaker 1>are we going to do with that, but get this

0:44:37.480 --> 0:44:41.799
<v Speaker 1>pal here's a date and a pretty good estimate of

0:44:41.840 --> 0:44:45.080
<v Speaker 1>a date that this thing existed. That's how much it

0:44:45.160 --> 0:44:47.080
<v Speaker 1>changed things. They used to be like this is older

0:44:47.120 --> 0:44:49.920
<v Speaker 1>than this. Now it's this. Let's see the ice man

0:44:49.960 --> 0:44:55.160
<v Speaker 1>was running around, you know, in and in doing that,

0:44:55.400 --> 0:44:58.640
<v Speaker 1>it also changes everything and that they're saying, oh well,

0:44:58.880 --> 0:45:02.200
<v Speaker 1>Letsie was also ound with tattoos on him that seemed

0:45:02.200 --> 0:45:05.880
<v Speaker 1>to suggest acupuncture, which apparently they didn't think anymore. But

0:45:05.880 --> 0:45:09.600
<v Speaker 1>but that changed our idea of how old acupuncture was.

0:45:10.040 --> 0:45:12.320
<v Speaker 1>And then he had certain tools on him. We didn't

0:45:12.320 --> 0:45:14.400
<v Speaker 1>know that they were making these tools back then, but

0:45:14.440 --> 0:45:17.719
<v Speaker 1>now that we've reliably dated Utsie, we know that the

0:45:17.719 --> 0:45:21.680
<v Speaker 1>the this, this toolmaking complex is much older. People had

0:45:21.719 --> 0:45:25.279
<v Speaker 1>professions much sooner than we thought. It just opens up

0:45:25.320 --> 0:45:27.560
<v Speaker 1>everything when you have a date for one thing. Yeah,

0:45:27.560 --> 0:45:30.360
<v Speaker 1>the tender rols are far reaching, right, exactly a broad

0:45:30.719 --> 0:45:33.520
<v Speaker 1>and it happened actually here in the United States to

0:45:33.680 --> 0:45:35.919
<v Speaker 1>ur in North America. You know, we did a whole

0:45:35.960 --> 0:45:39.920
<v Speaker 1>episode on the Clovis Police. Sure the idea that the

0:45:40.000 --> 0:45:43.200
<v Speaker 1>Clovis people were the first Americans and they came over

0:45:43.280 --> 0:45:46.640
<v Speaker 1>from crossing over the I guess the bearing Land Bridge

0:45:46.920 --> 0:45:50.239
<v Speaker 1>when the ice sheet receded, and so Willard Libby did

0:45:50.520 --> 0:45:54.719
<v Speaker 1>uh a test that showed there's no way that the

0:45:54.760 --> 0:46:01.439
<v Speaker 1>ice sheet was open anywhere before twelve thousand to five

0:46:01.560 --> 0:46:05.560
<v Speaker 1>fifteen thousand years ago. So he actually said a baseline,

0:46:05.760 --> 0:46:08.879
<v Speaker 1>this is when the earliest people possibly could have been here. Well,

0:46:08.880 --> 0:46:13.280
<v Speaker 1>we've been finding and radiocarbon dating settlements that are older

0:46:13.320 --> 0:46:16.440
<v Speaker 1>than that. They found one in Idaho on the Snake River.

0:46:16.480 --> 0:46:19.040
<v Speaker 1>I can't remember the name of the island. Um, that's

0:46:19.080 --> 0:46:23.040
<v Speaker 1>like almost sixteen thousand years old, and it shows definitively

0:46:23.560 --> 0:46:26.239
<v Speaker 1>that since the ice sheet was there, they couldn't have

0:46:26.280 --> 0:46:28.279
<v Speaker 1>come around the burying language. So now we think the

0:46:28.320 --> 0:46:33.400
<v Speaker 1>first Americans came over by boat, all because of radiocarbon dating. Amazing,

0:46:33.920 --> 0:46:36.960
<v Speaker 1>But we're screwing it all up for the future because

0:46:37.960 --> 0:46:40.880
<v Speaker 1>of human activity. Um that you know, we're burning a

0:46:40.920 --> 0:46:43.560
<v Speaker 1>lot of fossil fuels and we were releasing a lot

0:46:44.200 --> 0:46:48.520
<v Speaker 1>of carbon into the atmosphere, and so much so that

0:46:48.520 --> 0:46:54.640
<v Speaker 1>that that consistent, previously reliable ratio of carbon twelve to

0:46:54.680 --> 0:46:57.920
<v Speaker 1>carbon fourteen has been knocked all out of whack because

0:46:57.960 --> 0:47:02.279
<v Speaker 1>of us. And in the next what uh years, Yeah,

0:47:02.320 --> 0:47:05.600
<v Speaker 1>thirty to forty years. Uh, we may not be able

0:47:05.640 --> 0:47:08.799
<v Speaker 1>to date things accurately using this method anymore. Yeah. Yeah,

0:47:08.840 --> 0:47:10.919
<v Speaker 1>Because when you know, when they say, well you burn

0:47:10.960 --> 0:47:14.560
<v Speaker 1>fossil fuels, you release a lot of carbon dioxide. Well,

0:47:14.600 --> 0:47:17.520
<v Speaker 1>those fuels used to be alive, so they used to

0:47:17.600 --> 0:47:19.799
<v Speaker 1>have carbon fourteen in them, but they're so old there

0:47:19.840 --> 0:47:22.360
<v Speaker 1>isn't any carbon fourteen now, it's all just carbon twelve.

0:47:22.840 --> 0:47:25.600
<v Speaker 1>And we're releasing tons of carbon twelve into the atmosphere

0:47:25.600 --> 0:47:29.000
<v Speaker 1>that wouldn't normally be there. That's right. And uh, nuclear

0:47:29.040 --> 0:47:32.160
<v Speaker 1>tests that we conducted UM had a big actually had

0:47:32.160 --> 0:47:35.959
<v Speaker 1>the opposite effect. Between nineteen fifty five and nineteen sixty three,

0:47:36.440 --> 0:47:39.880
<v Speaker 1>the common concentration of carbon fourteen in the atmosphere doubled,

0:47:40.160 --> 0:47:44.080
<v Speaker 1>almost doubled. Yeah, so there's all screwy now. It is

0:47:44.120 --> 0:47:46.239
<v Speaker 1>a very screw so much so that now they have

0:47:46.520 --> 0:47:50.680
<v Speaker 1>modern samples. They have a beat harvest from the seventies

0:47:51.280 --> 0:47:53.520
<v Speaker 1>that they used to replace a beat from France from

0:47:53.560 --> 0:47:55.440
<v Speaker 1>nineteen fifty that they used to be like, this is

0:47:55.480 --> 0:47:58.080
<v Speaker 1>the baseline now for modern This is what we're reduced

0:47:58.120 --> 0:48:01.960
<v Speaker 1>to is sampling beats for God's say. That's how much

0:48:01.960 --> 0:48:05.560
<v Speaker 1>it screwed things up. But they have figured out how

0:48:05.680 --> 0:48:09.200
<v Speaker 1>to um use this kind of modern screw nous to

0:48:10.080 --> 0:48:13.839
<v Speaker 1>also date UM recent remains, which everyone thought was just

0:48:14.040 --> 0:48:17.520
<v Speaker 1>impossible Um, that you couldn't you couldn't tell when a

0:48:17.600 --> 0:48:20.359
<v Speaker 1>body lived or died if it were just a you know,

0:48:20.960 --> 0:48:24.680
<v Speaker 1>a decade or so dead or less. But we have

0:48:24.760 --> 0:48:27.520
<v Speaker 1>historical records for all this stuff. I know it's a

0:48:27.520 --> 0:48:30.040
<v Speaker 1>big deal, but like, and we're screwing stuff up to

0:48:30.080 --> 0:48:33.880
<v Speaker 1>the future. But isn't the the utility of carbon fourteen

0:48:33.960 --> 0:48:38.560
<v Speaker 1>dating because it was pre history? Yeah, that that certainly helps.

0:48:38.560 --> 0:48:40.760
<v Speaker 1>And yeah, I guess you're right that having a record

0:48:40.760 --> 0:48:43.319
<v Speaker 1>would definitely help quite a bit. And I'm not you know,

0:48:43.400 --> 0:48:46.360
<v Speaker 1>saying like who cares then? But at least we have

0:48:46.440 --> 0:48:49.719
<v Speaker 1>that going for us. That's a good point. It'd be like, well,

0:48:49.800 --> 0:48:52.840
<v Speaker 1>the leather seat from this automobile is the same age

0:48:52.880 --> 0:48:55.640
<v Speaker 1>as this leather shoe from three thousand years before, which

0:48:55.640 --> 0:48:58.759
<v Speaker 1>is which? Um, But yeah, they have figured out how

0:48:58.800 --> 0:49:02.600
<v Speaker 1>to how to use it for forensics based on your

0:49:02.600 --> 0:49:05.680
<v Speaker 1>teeth enamel, which are like tree rings, and then based

0:49:05.680 --> 0:49:08.719
<v Speaker 1>on your soft tissues. But your soft tissues degrade, so

0:49:08.760 --> 0:49:12.239
<v Speaker 1>they figured out that they can actually test the casings

0:49:12.280 --> 0:49:15.640
<v Speaker 1>from the larva that eat your soft tissues as you're decomposing.

0:49:15.840 --> 0:49:19.560
<v Speaker 1>So the soft tissue is the carbon fourteen in the scenario. Yeah,

0:49:19.600 --> 0:49:22.680
<v Speaker 1>which you're constantly remaking, and then as you die, it

0:49:22.760 --> 0:49:27.080
<v Speaker 1>gets it stops being um taken in, and then starts decaying.

0:49:27.760 --> 0:49:31.280
<v Speaker 1>And as you're being eaten by these you know, bug larva,

0:49:31.760 --> 0:49:35.160
<v Speaker 1>they shed their casings, and the casings don't degrade. So

0:49:35.200 --> 0:49:37.719
<v Speaker 1>you can come along and test the casings and they

0:49:37.920 --> 0:49:41.239
<v Speaker 1>ate your carbon fourteen and you can figure out when

0:49:41.320 --> 0:49:45.560
<v Speaker 1>that person that body last lived based on the casings

0:49:45.560 --> 0:49:48.640
<v Speaker 1>of the bugs that ate it. And in a million years,

0:49:48.760 --> 0:49:50.640
<v Speaker 1>if I were not to get cremated and they were

0:49:50.640 --> 0:49:53.000
<v Speaker 1>to bury me into the ground, the only thing that

0:49:53.040 --> 0:49:56.560
<v Speaker 1>would remain of me are the three titanium screws holding

0:49:56.600 --> 0:50:00.640
<v Speaker 1>in my three fake teeth. That's Nate. A million years,

0:50:00.800 --> 0:50:05.359
<v Speaker 1>who'd have thought, Yeah, there he is. Yeah, there's Chuck one.

0:50:06.280 --> 0:50:08.040
<v Speaker 1>You got anything else? There may be more than that

0:50:08.080 --> 0:50:11.080
<v Speaker 1>by then too, it might be four or five. Any so,

0:50:11.160 --> 0:50:13.040
<v Speaker 1>anything else you want to keep going that we can

0:50:13.160 --> 0:50:16.680
<v Speaker 1>keep talking about this. I have no dinner plans, Okay, Um, well,

0:50:17.080 --> 0:50:18.960
<v Speaker 1>I think we're gonna stop with Carbon four team. We

0:50:18.960 --> 0:50:21.120
<v Speaker 1>don't want to press our luck. It did go pretty well, Chuck,

0:50:21.200 --> 0:50:23.439
<v Speaker 1>I told you I think so. And since I said

0:50:23.440 --> 0:50:28.239
<v Speaker 1>it went pretty well, it's time for listener mail all right,

0:50:28.640 --> 0:50:30.840
<v Speaker 1>and I was preparing for the next episode. Yeah, we

0:50:30.880 --> 0:50:34.359
<v Speaker 1>got a listener mail for look at me? All right.

0:50:34.360 --> 0:50:39.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna call this uh soup follow up. If you remember,

0:50:39.480 --> 0:50:43.520
<v Speaker 1>we talked about cam soup in a previous episode on

0:50:44.120 --> 0:50:48.040
<v Speaker 1>what Else Augmented Reality? Right, And I think we were

0:50:48.120 --> 0:50:52.120
<v Speaker 1>pegged as a progressive guys because you you spoke up first.

0:50:53.160 --> 0:50:57.919
<v Speaker 1>It's yeah with a name brand. I'm a Campbell's man. Hey,

0:50:57.960 --> 0:51:00.279
<v Speaker 1>I don't discriminate. I like Campbell's Chunky two. I just

0:51:00.320 --> 0:51:01.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of went along with it. I didn't want to

0:51:01.560 --> 0:51:04.600
<v Speaker 1>ruffle any feathers. I didn't speak up, but this is

0:51:04.640 --> 0:51:07.680
<v Speaker 1>about that. Hey, guys, there are no words to describe

0:51:07.680 --> 0:51:10.239
<v Speaker 1>how much I enjoy your podcast. I've listened to every

0:51:10.239 --> 0:51:13.120
<v Speaker 1>single episode and continue to do so each and every week.

0:51:13.160 --> 0:51:16.440
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for bringing wonderful science, exploration, for knowledge and

0:51:16.520 --> 0:51:19.239
<v Speaker 1>laughs to my days. So far, so good. I listened

0:51:19.280 --> 0:51:22.200
<v Speaker 1>to the latest episode on Augmented Reality while on a

0:51:22.239 --> 0:51:25.239
<v Speaker 1>plane to Boston, and I could not stop laughing. When

0:51:25.239 --> 0:51:28.200
<v Speaker 1>you got to a full on sant tangent about can Soup.

0:51:28.760 --> 0:51:31.160
<v Speaker 1>I thought, this is my moment, this is my chance

0:51:31.160 --> 0:51:33.759
<v Speaker 1>to write in I've been two Stars struck before. But

0:51:33.840 --> 0:51:36.160
<v Speaker 1>here we go. I know can Soup all too well.

0:51:36.239 --> 0:51:38.840
<v Speaker 1>I spent seven years right out of college working for

0:51:38.920 --> 0:51:43.560
<v Speaker 1>General Mills. Yes, they make the serial, but they also

0:51:43.600 --> 0:51:47.520
<v Speaker 1>owned Progresso. I worked in sales, managing our businesses with

0:51:47.560 --> 0:51:50.279
<v Speaker 1>our East Coast and national accounts. Three years ago, I

0:51:50.360 --> 0:51:53.080
<v Speaker 1>left General Mills and went to work for Campbell Soup.

0:51:53.840 --> 0:51:58.040
<v Speaker 1>It's like, I guess, so just outside of Philadelphia. I

0:51:58.080 --> 0:51:59.600
<v Speaker 1>guess you could say I too have a thing for

0:51:59.719 --> 0:52:03.560
<v Speaker 1>Cance Soup. I currently manage our soup and pray go business,

0:52:04.000 --> 0:52:06.160
<v Speaker 1>one of our largest East Coast grocery chains, and although

0:52:06.160 --> 0:52:08.719
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't seem complicated, I can tell you a lot

0:52:08.800 --> 0:52:12.000
<v Speaker 1>of work goes into you enjoying your can of red

0:52:12.040 --> 0:52:15.840
<v Speaker 1>and white chicken noodle soup. I still love that Campbel's

0:52:15.920 --> 0:52:18.440
<v Speaker 1>chicken noodle. Oh yeah, it's so good. It's like, how

0:52:18.440 --> 0:52:20.840
<v Speaker 1>do you mess with a classic like that? Well, but

0:52:21.080 --> 0:52:25.080
<v Speaker 1>there's also progressive creamy chicken noodles is the bomb. When

0:52:25.080 --> 0:52:27.319
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned this episode brought to you by Progresso as

0:52:27.360 --> 0:52:29.520
<v Speaker 1>a joke, I was just waiting for you to plug

0:52:29.560 --> 0:52:33.279
<v Speaker 1>that you liked Campbell's as well and even more ha ha.

0:52:33.840 --> 0:52:35.960
<v Speaker 1>Either way, I'm just glad you both enjoy eating our soups.

0:52:36.160 --> 0:52:37.480
<v Speaker 1>I would be happy to give you a tour of

0:52:37.520 --> 0:52:41.319
<v Speaker 1>Campbell's soup HQ if you're ever in Philly. Thanks to

0:52:41.360 --> 0:52:44.040
<v Speaker 1>the entire team for all you do. You guys are

0:52:44.080 --> 0:52:50.120
<v Speaker 1>a legend combined into a singular. That's from Kathleen and Kathleen.

0:52:50.960 --> 0:52:53.560
<v Speaker 1>Uh no shade to progressive, But I'm a Campbell's man.

0:52:54.120 --> 0:52:58.640
<v Speaker 1>I eat three soups a day. I eat Campbell's chicken noodle.

0:52:59.239 --> 0:53:02.440
<v Speaker 1>I ate chicken corn chowder. I don't know. I fare

0:53:02.520 --> 0:53:05.719
<v Speaker 1>that's and I eat their new England clam chowder. Yeah,

0:53:05.760 --> 0:53:10.600
<v Speaker 1>that's good. Who who eats Manhattan clam chowder? I don't know,

0:53:10.760 --> 0:53:12.960
<v Speaker 1>or I'm sorry, man, I had a clam chowder. No one,

0:53:13.239 --> 0:53:16.160
<v Speaker 1>not even Manahaddan had nights. They're like, get this away,

0:53:16.200 --> 0:53:18.560
<v Speaker 1>give me the real stuff, give me that creamy goodness.

0:53:18.600 --> 0:53:23.120
<v Speaker 1>Do you ever have meatball alphabet? No? I don't know

0:53:23.160 --> 0:53:25.879
<v Speaker 1>what we're in those meatballs, but I grew up on them,

0:53:25.960 --> 0:53:28.120
<v Speaker 1>and look at me now. I know. That's all the

0:53:28.120 --> 0:53:30.600
<v Speaker 1>soups I eat. Though it's weird. I have three soups. Yeah,

0:53:30.920 --> 0:53:34.279
<v Speaker 1>and you gotta do the chunky stuff Campbell's chunky, I

0:53:34.280 --> 0:53:36.719
<v Speaker 1>mean become in large cans, is like a hungry man. Well,

0:53:36.760 --> 0:53:40.200
<v Speaker 1>that's the chicken corn chowder and the I have had

0:53:40.239 --> 0:53:41.960
<v Speaker 1>that and it's good. Those are chunky. Have you heard

0:53:42.000 --> 0:53:45.400
<v Speaker 1>the chicken pot pie? No? But I just made a

0:53:45.440 --> 0:53:49.480
<v Speaker 1>homemade gluten free chicken pot pie biscuit topped. Well, how

0:53:49.520 --> 0:53:52.520
<v Speaker 1>do you make a biscuit without gluten? You make it

0:53:52.560 --> 0:53:57.239
<v Speaker 1>with one to one flower instead of wheat flower? What

0:53:57.400 --> 0:54:01.239
<v Speaker 1>kind of flower is not wheat flour? What is like

0:54:01.280 --> 0:54:04.239
<v Speaker 1>the white flower? Do you never luten free pasta? And

0:54:05.239 --> 0:54:06.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean I've heard of it, I haven't eaten it.

0:54:07.040 --> 0:54:09.960
<v Speaker 1>It's just made with flower without gluten. It's called one

0:54:10.000 --> 0:54:13.000
<v Speaker 1>to one is in the ratio. So basically you buy

0:54:13.040 --> 0:54:17.520
<v Speaker 1>the gluten free flower. Sometimes just rice flour, okay, tapioca,

0:54:17.680 --> 0:54:20.839
<v Speaker 1>But have you had chicken flower? I don't think so

0:54:20.920 --> 0:54:22.800
<v Speaker 1>it's not bad. I mean, I'm not gluten free. I

0:54:22.840 --> 0:54:25.520
<v Speaker 1>did this so Emily get enjoyed chicken pope pie. But

0:54:25.560 --> 0:54:27.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, you lay out you make the little chickenscu

0:54:27.560 --> 0:54:30.160
<v Speaker 1>good little biscuits and you lay them on top of

0:54:30.200 --> 0:54:34.640
<v Speaker 1>your pot pie, and then you brush it with egg yolk. Nice,

0:54:34.800 --> 0:54:38.040
<v Speaker 1>and then that Bronze is up to a shiny brown

0:54:38.160 --> 0:54:41.480
<v Speaker 1>top like people laying on the beach and so good.

0:54:41.840 --> 0:54:44.200
<v Speaker 1>That is nice. Man, make a good chicken pop. Have

0:54:44.280 --> 0:54:46.279
<v Speaker 1>you had it already but had like I haded this

0:54:46.280 --> 0:54:48.799
<v Speaker 1>past weekend, but I have not had the soup, which

0:54:48.840 --> 0:54:51.560
<v Speaker 1>is what led me to that danger. It's good, I

0:54:51.600 --> 0:54:55.040
<v Speaker 1>won't I don't discriminate progressive Campbell's it's all good. Well,

0:54:55.120 --> 0:54:57.000
<v Speaker 1>Chuck is checking his phone to see what time, and

0:54:57.040 --> 0:54:58.920
<v Speaker 1>it's so I guess we should probably end this episode.

0:54:58.960 --> 0:55:00.279
<v Speaker 1>If you want to get in touch a this to

0:55:00.400 --> 0:55:02.879
<v Speaker 1>offer us a tour of where you work. That's always nice.

0:55:02.920 --> 0:55:05.360
<v Speaker 1>Thank you. Um. You can go on to stuff you

0:55:05.400 --> 0:55:07.719
<v Speaker 1>Should Know dot com, check out our social links, or

0:55:07.719 --> 0:55:10.560
<v Speaker 1>you can send us an email to stuff Podcasts at

0:55:10.600 --> 0:55:16.200
<v Speaker 1>I heart radio dot com. Stuff you Should Know is

0:55:16.200 --> 0:55:18.839
<v Speaker 1>a production of iHeart Radios How stuff Works. For more

0:55:18.880 --> 0:55:21.319
<v Speaker 1>podcasts for my heart Radio, visit the iHeart Radio app,

0:55:21.400 --> 0:55:24.040
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.