WEBVTT - Is the Era of Free Returns Over?

0:00:15.356 --> 0:00:15.796
<v Speaker 1>Pushkin.

0:00:21.156 --> 0:00:25.836
<v Speaker 2>There's this genre of YouTube video, the unboxing video. It

0:00:25.876 --> 0:00:28.316
<v Speaker 2>starts with somebody on screen with a package that just

0:00:28.356 --> 0:00:32.196
<v Speaker 2>got delivered. It's something they ordered online, a watch or

0:00:32.356 --> 0:00:35.716
<v Speaker 2>a stand mixer, really could be anything, and the video

0:00:36.356 --> 0:00:39.796
<v Speaker 2>is just the person opening the package and then opening

0:00:39.876 --> 0:00:43.356
<v Speaker 2>the box inside the package and taking out this new

0:00:43.396 --> 0:00:46.516
<v Speaker 2>thing that they just bought. That's it. That is the

0:00:46.636 --> 0:00:50.636
<v Speaker 2>unboxing video, and it's not really my thing. I want

0:00:50.636 --> 0:00:56.676
<v Speaker 2>somebody to make reboxing videos. Some practical middle aged dad, say,

0:00:57.356 --> 0:01:00.476
<v Speaker 2>decides he really doesn't need those those hiking boots that

0:01:00.516 --> 0:01:03.156
<v Speaker 2>he ordered online last week. We see him putting the

0:01:03.196 --> 0:01:05.516
<v Speaker 2>boots back in the shoe box and then putting the

0:01:05.516 --> 0:01:08.916
<v Speaker 2>shoebox in a cardboard box, taping it up, maybe putting

0:01:08.916 --> 0:01:11.676
<v Speaker 2>able on the box, and then dropping the box off

0:01:11.676 --> 0:01:16.876
<v Speaker 2>at ups for that sweet, sweet full refund. That is

0:01:16.956 --> 0:01:26.476
<v Speaker 2>relatable content. I'm Jacob Goldstein and this is What's Your Problem,

0:01:26.716 --> 0:01:28.956
<v Speaker 2>the show where I talk to people who are trying

0:01:28.996 --> 0:01:33.796
<v Speaker 2>to make technological progress. My guest today is Ahmatsharma. He's

0:01:33.796 --> 0:01:37.676
<v Speaker 2>the co founder and CEO of Narvar. Narvar works with

0:01:37.716 --> 0:01:41.796
<v Speaker 2>companies like Sephora, Lululemon, and home Depot to manage the

0:01:41.956 --> 0:01:47.716
<v Speaker 2>post purchase phase of online shopping, tracking alerts, and crucially,

0:01:48.316 --> 0:01:52.796
<v Speaker 2>returns and returns are huge, hundreds of billions of dollars

0:01:52.836 --> 0:01:56.196
<v Speaker 2>a year in the US overall, something like ten percent

0:01:56.316 --> 0:01:59.956
<v Speaker 2>of online purchases are returned, and for categories like shoes,

0:01:59.996 --> 0:02:03.396
<v Speaker 2>it's even higher, around twenty five or thirty percent. For

0:02:03.436 --> 0:02:06.556
<v Speaker 2>the retailers I'm it works with, this is profoundly expensive.

0:02:07.116 --> 0:02:09.916
<v Speaker 2>So the problem I wanted to discuss the omet was this.

0:02:10.836 --> 0:02:14.316
<v Speaker 2>E commerce companies have trained us to love free returns,

0:02:14.476 --> 0:02:17.836
<v Speaker 2>but will they be able to afford it to start? Though,

0:02:18.196 --> 0:02:21.476
<v Speaker 2>we talked about just the basics of how returns work.

0:02:23.476 --> 0:02:25.876
<v Speaker 2>What happens when I send back a pair of shoes.

0:02:25.916 --> 0:02:28.396
<v Speaker 2>I know there's lots of options, but I do whatever

0:02:29.196 --> 0:02:31.676
<v Speaker 2>I ship it off. What happens to that pair of

0:02:31.716 --> 0:02:34.396
<v Speaker 2>shoes that I have bought and sent back next? Where

0:02:34.396 --> 0:02:34.796
<v Speaker 2>does it go?

0:02:35.276 --> 0:02:39.396
<v Speaker 1>Once that pair of shoes gets back to the retailer,

0:02:39.996 --> 0:02:42.796
<v Speaker 1>they will do what they call the grading process, which

0:02:42.796 --> 0:02:46.756
<v Speaker 1>will say, hey, is this shoe is in a good

0:02:46.876 --> 0:02:51.196
<v Speaker 1>condition to go back on shelf to be sold again

0:02:51.596 --> 0:02:54.596
<v Speaker 1>as a proper full price item.

0:02:54.356 --> 0:02:57.036
<v Speaker 2>So as a new pair of shoes? Yeah?

0:02:57.116 --> 0:02:57.556
<v Speaker 3>If not?

0:02:57.996 --> 0:03:01.676
<v Speaker 1>If it is you know, if it's scuffed or there

0:03:01.676 --> 0:03:04.436
<v Speaker 1>are some issues, can it can be sold on hey,

0:03:04.916 --> 0:03:07.596
<v Speaker 1>worn already or a discounted piece of it.

0:03:07.916 --> 0:03:09.556
<v Speaker 3>So there's a second way of doing that.

0:03:10.156 --> 0:03:14.876
<v Speaker 1>Third is that if it is completely in non sellable condition,

0:03:15.556 --> 0:03:18.796
<v Speaker 1>then you know, retailers have a couple of options. Either

0:03:18.836 --> 0:03:23.076
<v Speaker 1>it goes to landfill or you can actually sell sell

0:03:23.076 --> 0:03:26.716
<v Speaker 1>into secondary market, which means it may show up on

0:03:27.796 --> 0:03:30.436
<v Speaker 1>other market places such as eBay.

0:03:30.756 --> 0:03:34.556
<v Speaker 2>So does that mean that when I'm buying shoes online,

0:03:34.836 --> 0:03:37.476
<v Speaker 2>are they usually shoes that somebody has like bought and

0:03:37.516 --> 0:03:39.596
<v Speaker 2>then returned? Like? How often when I buy a pair

0:03:39.596 --> 0:03:41.476
<v Speaker 2>of new shoes has somebody bought them and returned them?

0:03:41.556 --> 0:03:42.436
<v Speaker 3>It's a good chance.

0:03:42.476 --> 0:03:46.636
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, usually for a pair of shoes,

0:03:46.676 --> 0:03:50.756
<v Speaker 1>it might take three or four round trips to find

0:03:50.796 --> 0:03:54.396
<v Speaker 1>the right home or right pair of feet to get there.

0:03:54.516 --> 0:03:56.196
<v Speaker 2>Wait, when you say three or four round trips, do

0:03:56.196 --> 0:03:59.876
<v Speaker 2>you mean most like is there for a typical pair

0:03:59.876 --> 0:04:02.436
<v Speaker 2>of shoes sold online? It goes out and back and

0:04:02.476 --> 0:04:04.596
<v Speaker 2>out and back like that's a normal things.

0:04:04.356 --> 0:04:06.676
<v Speaker 3>Normal thing. I mean typically people will buy one size

0:04:06.716 --> 0:04:07.636
<v Speaker 3>up and one size down.

0:04:07.836 --> 0:04:11.636
<v Speaker 1>Twenty plus years ago, Appos when they started in the place.

0:04:11.676 --> 0:04:13.956
<v Speaker 1>I mean that there was a they changed the equation

0:04:14.276 --> 0:04:17.316
<v Speaker 1>free shipping and free returns both ways out and then

0:04:17.436 --> 0:04:20.836
<v Speaker 1>you know, you will see all the experience and the

0:04:20.836 --> 0:04:23.316
<v Speaker 1>stories out there from consumers where they're trying on shoes

0:04:23.316 --> 0:04:26.156
<v Speaker 1>and they're keeping what they like or fit, and the

0:04:26.196 --> 0:04:26.956
<v Speaker 1>returning rest of.

0:04:26.916 --> 0:04:31.196
<v Speaker 2>It was the Zappos free returns thing, like the watershed

0:04:31.236 --> 0:04:35.716
<v Speaker 2>moment for returns. Is that the like glowing origin story

0:04:35.516 --> 0:04:37.636
<v Speaker 2>of online.

0:04:37.236 --> 0:04:41.916
<v Speaker 1>Returns absolutely hands down, and Zappos and Zamazon they changed

0:04:41.916 --> 0:04:44.996
<v Speaker 1>the equation for consumers for good.

0:04:45.516 --> 0:04:47.556
<v Speaker 2>I want to talk a little bit about the kind

0:04:47.636 --> 0:04:51.196
<v Speaker 2>of evolution of online returns, right, So Zappos was what

0:04:51.276 --> 0:04:55.836
<v Speaker 2>their early oughts. So before Zappo's hard for people to believe.

0:04:55.876 --> 0:04:57.796
<v Speaker 2>Now you had to pay to return stuff where you

0:04:57.796 --> 0:04:58.676
<v Speaker 2>bought it online.

0:04:58.876 --> 0:05:02.756
<v Speaker 1>That is correct, And you may even have to call

0:05:02.836 --> 0:05:07.196
<v Speaker 1>the contact center or customer service to even get an

0:05:07.276 --> 0:05:10.996
<v Speaker 1>authorization that you can even return it. Hey, I am

0:05:11.116 --> 0:05:12.916
<v Speaker 1>so and so and I placed an order and I

0:05:12.956 --> 0:05:15.596
<v Speaker 1>would like to return it. It gets authorized, then only

0:05:15.636 --> 0:05:16.236
<v Speaker 1>you send.

0:05:15.996 --> 0:05:19.076
<v Speaker 2>It back, like the companies really didn't want you to

0:05:19.156 --> 0:05:20.876
<v Speaker 2>return stuff you bought online.

0:05:21.076 --> 0:05:23.596
<v Speaker 1>Well, that's one way of saying it. If you want

0:05:23.636 --> 0:05:26.276
<v Speaker 1>to speak with brands and retailers. They would say, we

0:05:26.356 --> 0:05:28.236
<v Speaker 1>really want you to make sure you're buying what you

0:05:28.276 --> 0:05:28.836
<v Speaker 1>want to keep.

0:05:29.116 --> 0:05:31.116
<v Speaker 2>And I mean it makes sense, right, I mean it

0:05:31.196 --> 0:05:35.756
<v Speaker 2>must be profoundly expensive for companies to deal with returns, right,

0:05:35.756 --> 0:05:37.916
<v Speaker 2>I mean, let's talk about that. So, first of all,

0:05:37.996 --> 0:05:41.916
<v Speaker 2>free returns are not in fact free, right, We're all

0:05:41.996 --> 0:05:44.916
<v Speaker 2>there included, we're all paying for free returns, whether we

0:05:45.196 --> 0:05:46.076
<v Speaker 2>return stuff or not.

0:05:47.156 --> 0:05:51.756
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely. I mean there's a cost of shipping or bringing

0:05:51.796 --> 0:05:55.196
<v Speaker 1>it back. There is the labor cost of as we

0:05:55.356 --> 0:06:00.156
<v Speaker 1>just discussing, inspecting it, grading it, you know, putting it

0:06:00.236 --> 0:06:03.876
<v Speaker 1>back on shelf, and then selling it again.

0:06:03.916 --> 0:06:05.436
<v Speaker 3>So there's so much cost.

0:06:05.476 --> 0:06:10.036
<v Speaker 1>And then, as we discuss, not everything goes back online

0:06:10.076 --> 0:06:12.476
<v Speaker 1>to sell full price. You know, twenty thirty percent of

0:06:12.516 --> 0:06:15.796
<v Speaker 1>items get discarded, either in the secondary market or landfill.

0:06:15.836 --> 0:06:20.556
<v Speaker 1>So they say tangible, significant cost associated with returns.

0:06:21.236 --> 0:06:23.356
<v Speaker 2>And I feel like for companies at some level, this

0:06:23.436 --> 0:06:27.516
<v Speaker 2>is an optimization problem, right. They want to maximize sales

0:06:27.716 --> 0:06:31.116
<v Speaker 2>while minimizing returns, and to some extent those things are

0:06:31.116 --> 0:06:31.996
<v Speaker 2>our intention for.

0:06:31.956 --> 0:06:35.196
<v Speaker 3>Them, absolutely, no doubt about it.

0:06:35.676 --> 0:06:40.796
<v Speaker 1>And then our analysis shows to quantify that for you know,

0:06:41.076 --> 0:06:46.636
<v Speaker 1>every one hundred dollars of online sales, roughly twenty five

0:06:46.716 --> 0:06:51.156
<v Speaker 1>or twenty six dollars of impact comes from returns.

0:06:52.076 --> 0:06:55.036
<v Speaker 2>So that's twenty five percent of the gross twenty five

0:06:55.076 --> 0:06:57.876
<v Speaker 2>percent of their gross revenue is dealing with returns.

0:06:58.116 --> 0:07:01.996
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely, yeah, a lot, Yeah, it is. That is a lot. Yeah,

0:07:02.036 --> 0:07:03.076
<v Speaker 3>it's a massive number.

0:07:03.836 --> 0:07:06.076
<v Speaker 2>Is part of what your company tries to do to

0:07:06.156 --> 0:07:07.836
<v Speaker 2>get that percentage down.

0:07:09.236 --> 0:07:11.116
<v Speaker 1>Yes, So there are a couple of things that you

0:07:11.116 --> 0:07:14.676
<v Speaker 1>have to think about. You can actually figure out what's

0:07:14.716 --> 0:07:17.956
<v Speaker 1>the most optimal way or the cost effective way to

0:07:18.036 --> 0:07:21.556
<v Speaker 1>bring the goods back to the merchant. So who is

0:07:21.596 --> 0:07:24.556
<v Speaker 1>the right carrier, which is the right location to drop off?

0:07:24.596 --> 0:07:28.796
<v Speaker 1>And there are cost effective ways. Second A is enforcing

0:07:28.836 --> 0:07:29.876
<v Speaker 1>your returns policy.

0:07:30.156 --> 0:07:30.316
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:07:30.356 --> 0:07:34.156
<v Speaker 1>So if you are, you know, buying something online and

0:07:35.276 --> 0:07:39.436
<v Speaker 1>retailer has thirty day policy, you don't want to offer

0:07:39.556 --> 0:07:42.836
<v Speaker 1>or honor returns at day forty five or day fifty.

0:07:43.356 --> 0:07:47.196
<v Speaker 2>I have observed that different companies make it easier or

0:07:47.236 --> 0:07:52.556
<v Speaker 2>less easy to return things, right. I will say, you know,

0:07:52.636 --> 0:07:54.676
<v Speaker 2>sometimes you can just bring the thing. You don't even

0:07:54.716 --> 0:07:56.516
<v Speaker 2>have to put it in a box. You just bring

0:07:56.556 --> 0:07:59.396
<v Speaker 2>the thing to whatever the drug store or all foods

0:07:59.836 --> 0:08:03.316
<v Speaker 2>and give them the thing which feels like magic. Sometimes

0:08:03.316 --> 0:08:05.476
<v Speaker 2>you have to like put it in the box. Sometimes

0:08:05.556 --> 0:08:08.836
<v Speaker 2>even have to print out the label, which who even

0:08:08.876 --> 0:08:12.316
<v Speaker 2>has a printer. I have assumed that those were deliberate

0:08:12.396 --> 0:08:15.436
<v Speaker 2>choices on the part of companies, and that there was

0:08:15.476 --> 0:08:18.036
<v Speaker 2>a strategic reason to make it harder to return things,

0:08:18.036 --> 0:08:20.156
<v Speaker 2>which is it would cause people to return things less

0:08:20.476 --> 0:08:20.916
<v Speaker 2>for sure.

0:08:20.916 --> 0:08:22.876
<v Speaker 1>But Jacob, let me ask you a question. Would you

0:08:22.916 --> 0:08:25.156
<v Speaker 1>buy your pair of shoes when it is arduous or

0:08:25.156 --> 0:08:27.076
<v Speaker 1>a difficult process to return from the company that you

0:08:27.076 --> 0:08:28.116
<v Speaker 1>would like to buy.

0:08:28.436 --> 0:08:32.076
<v Speaker 2>If they were a lot cheaper? Maybe right? If there's

0:08:32.076 --> 0:08:35.156
<v Speaker 2>something take running shoes. I buy basically the same pair

0:08:35.196 --> 0:08:37.996
<v Speaker 2>of running shoes every few months. I know what running

0:08:37.996 --> 0:08:42.156
<v Speaker 2>shoes I want. It's the Nike Pegasus whatever is last

0:08:42.196 --> 0:08:45.556
<v Speaker 2>year's model. I've been buying them for many years. And

0:08:45.596 --> 0:08:47.676
<v Speaker 2>in fact, when I buy those shoes, I go to

0:08:47.796 --> 0:08:51.596
<v Speaker 2>like weird second tier retailers because I just want to

0:08:51.596 --> 0:08:53.436
<v Speaker 2>buy them cheap. I know what they are, so in

0:08:53.476 --> 0:08:58.036
<v Speaker 2>those instances I am more price sensitive and less concerned

0:08:58.076 --> 0:08:59.396
<v Speaker 2>that my returns will be easy.

0:08:59.996 --> 0:09:01.836
<v Speaker 1>But do you bring a really great point? And the

0:09:02.036 --> 0:09:06.396
<v Speaker 1>consumer behavior is in essentially two pieces, right value seeking

0:09:06.956 --> 0:09:08.676
<v Speaker 1>whether it is a good value.

0:09:08.356 --> 0:09:11.156
<v Speaker 3>For the product you buy, or convenience seeking. Those are

0:09:11.196 --> 0:09:11.996
<v Speaker 3>the two pieces.

0:09:12.236 --> 0:09:16.756
<v Speaker 1>So the question is, you know, for businesses to grow,

0:09:17.276 --> 0:09:20.716
<v Speaker 1>they not only need their loyal customers, but they need

0:09:20.756 --> 0:09:23.156
<v Speaker 1>the next set of new customers who are coming to you.

0:09:23.676 --> 0:09:26.756
<v Speaker 3>Right and if you're a brand or a retailer.

0:09:26.396 --> 0:09:29.796
<v Speaker 1>And if you are attracting the customer for the first time,

0:09:30.316 --> 0:09:35.076
<v Speaker 1>they actually do check your help section and retailer's FAQ

0:09:35.236 --> 0:09:37.996
<v Speaker 1>to make sure what are your returns policies. I'm not

0:09:38.476 --> 0:09:41.116
<v Speaker 1>comfortable buying for the first time for a brand or

0:09:41.196 --> 0:09:44.156
<v Speaker 1>retailer if I don't know if those pair of shoes

0:09:44.756 --> 0:09:48.276
<v Speaker 1>and I have easy to understand or easy to follow

0:09:48.516 --> 0:09:49.396
<v Speaker 1>returns process.

0:09:50.356 --> 0:09:52.756
<v Speaker 2>I mean there's another version, and you do still see

0:09:52.796 --> 0:09:56.476
<v Speaker 2>it sometimes, although it's rare, which is when you send

0:09:56.516 --> 0:09:59.036
<v Speaker 2>something back they charge you for shipping. They're like, we'll

0:09:59.036 --> 0:10:02.156
<v Speaker 2>give you a refund minus eight dollars for shipping. Like

0:10:02.516 --> 0:10:05.476
<v Speaker 2>that is still a thing that one sees occasionally.

0:10:05.676 --> 0:10:10.996
<v Speaker 1>Not not occasionally, you'll be surprised forty percent four zero

0:10:11.476 --> 0:10:16.076
<v Speaker 1>percent of top online retailers in the US are charging

0:10:16.116 --> 0:10:17.156
<v Speaker 1>for return fee.

0:10:17.436 --> 0:10:19.156
<v Speaker 2>Oh you don't say, yeah.

0:10:18.956 --> 0:10:21.636
<v Speaker 3>And typically in your example, what they will say, I.

0:10:21.556 --> 0:10:24.876
<v Speaker 1>Will give you your money back minus the return fee.

0:10:25.156 --> 0:10:28.196
<v Speaker 2>Like, behaviorally, that's a nice move, right because you're still

0:10:28.236 --> 0:10:31.316
<v Speaker 2>getting money back and so like, I feel like it

0:10:31.436 --> 0:10:34.716
<v Speaker 2>works with the behavioral economics pretty well. And do your

0:10:35.276 --> 0:10:37.356
<v Speaker 2>customers choose that as well? Is that sort of on

0:10:37.396 --> 0:10:38.636
<v Speaker 2>the menu of things you offer?

0:10:38.796 --> 0:10:41.916
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean we are a tech platform. You can

0:10:42.036 --> 0:10:46.996
<v Speaker 1>design and define your returns policies. And I think earlier

0:10:47.036 --> 0:10:50.876
<v Speaker 1>you were saying even the choice and convenience, whether.

0:10:52.316 --> 0:10:57.596
<v Speaker 3>A retailer wants consumer to print the label in their homes.

0:10:57.476 --> 0:11:00.076
<v Speaker 1>Or their offices if they're going to offices, or pack

0:11:00.116 --> 0:11:02.916
<v Speaker 1>it yourself and then drop it off, or you just

0:11:03.036 --> 0:11:05.796
<v Speaker 1>bring the item which is non boxed, don't have to

0:11:05.796 --> 0:11:09.676
<v Speaker 1>print the label, simply go to designated places where they

0:11:09.716 --> 0:11:11.636
<v Speaker 1>will scan your QR code.

0:11:11.676 --> 0:11:14.436
<v Speaker 3>Don't worry about printing a label or package it.

0:11:14.676 --> 0:11:19.236
<v Speaker 1>Then, all these things are designed based on the brand's

0:11:20.036 --> 0:11:24.116
<v Speaker 1>position on those pieces, and they drive different behaviors. For example,

0:11:24.356 --> 0:11:26.796
<v Speaker 1>if you give them the choice, they will actually return

0:11:26.876 --> 0:11:29.316
<v Speaker 1>those items faster. It's not sitting in your car or

0:11:29.436 --> 0:11:33.796
<v Speaker 1>back of your trunk and finding the right place to

0:11:33.836 --> 0:11:34.636
<v Speaker 1>doing the returns.

0:11:35.076 --> 0:11:37.316
<v Speaker 2>Let me ask you this, when a company makes me

0:11:37.396 --> 0:11:39.996
<v Speaker 2>print out a return label? Are they doing it to

0:11:40.116 --> 0:11:42.476
<v Speaker 2>reduce the chances that I will return the product?

0:11:43.036 --> 0:11:46.156
<v Speaker 1>That's a good, good question. I never thought that way

0:11:46.676 --> 0:11:48.676
<v Speaker 1>is just giving and.

0:11:48.796 --> 0:11:51.356
<v Speaker 2>Why else would they do it? You know, there are

0:11:51.396 --> 0:11:53.996
<v Speaker 2>companies and I like this. I like this. There are

0:11:53.996 --> 0:11:57.756
<v Speaker 2>companies that will put in the package they're shipping you

0:11:58.036 --> 0:12:02.556
<v Speaker 2>a return sticker label right where you open the bag.

0:12:02.636 --> 0:12:06.076
<v Speaker 2>It's like a plastic bag and you take out the

0:12:06.116 --> 0:12:09.076
<v Speaker 2>shirt or whatever, and A the plastic bag is resealed,

0:12:09.436 --> 0:12:11.956
<v Speaker 2>and b there's a sticker return label. And like when

0:12:11.956 --> 0:12:15.556
<v Speaker 2>a company does that, I'm like, they're on my side.

0:12:15.636 --> 0:12:17.076
<v Speaker 2>I mean, they're on my side. Is kind of a dumb,

0:12:17.156 --> 0:12:19.156
<v Speaker 2>naive thing to think, But I think, oh that's nice,

0:12:19.196 --> 0:12:21.436
<v Speaker 2>Like that is going to make me a more loyal

0:12:21.476 --> 0:12:24.636
<v Speaker 2>customer of this company because they are not deliberately making

0:12:24.676 --> 0:12:26.356
<v Speaker 2>it hard for me to return this shirt.

0:12:26.476 --> 0:12:29.636
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so let's play a devil's advocate there. Yeah, we

0:12:29.836 --> 0:12:33.516
<v Speaker 1>just discussed that on an average, On an average in

0:12:33.556 --> 0:12:36.396
<v Speaker 1>the retail industry, online returns rates.

0:12:36.236 --> 0:12:38.236
<v Speaker 3>Around ten percent. Yeah, ten percent.

0:12:38.396 --> 0:12:44.116
<v Speaker 1>That means ninety percent of the paper print ink electricity

0:12:44.196 --> 0:12:46.796
<v Speaker 1>going to that printing that label is never going to

0:12:46.796 --> 0:12:47.116
<v Speaker 1>be used.

0:12:48.276 --> 0:12:50.796
<v Speaker 2>Come on, is that really you really think it's the

0:12:50.876 --> 0:12:53.916
<v Speaker 2>cost of printing the label? Come on, what's the cost

0:12:53.956 --> 0:12:55.276
<v Speaker 2>of print a label for.

0:12:55.316 --> 0:12:57.516
<v Speaker 3>A large retailer? It will cost you closer to million

0:12:57.556 --> 0:12:58.236
<v Speaker 3>dollars every year.

0:12:59.116 --> 0:13:02.636
<v Speaker 2>I know, But we care about one label. What's the

0:13:02.676 --> 0:13:04.036
<v Speaker 2>cost of the print one label?

0:13:04.236 --> 0:13:08.396
<v Speaker 3>But that's another good twenty five cents. But it adds up.

0:13:09.236 --> 0:13:10.236
<v Speaker 3>Everything adds up.

0:13:10.756 --> 0:13:13.836
<v Speaker 2>Listen, there's a dial that companies can turn of like

0:13:14.156 --> 0:13:17.556
<v Speaker 2>make it really easy to return things, make it medium

0:13:17.596 --> 0:13:20.316
<v Speaker 2>to return things, make it hard, right, and they would

0:13:20.316 --> 0:13:24.356
<v Speaker 2>be dumb not to think about the behavioral responses to

0:13:24.436 --> 0:13:27.636
<v Speaker 2>the things they're doing. Right, Truly, that's part of the calculation.

0:13:27.356 --> 0:13:30.876
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely, But you know it's not either are you know

0:13:31.036 --> 0:13:33.316
<v Speaker 1>you want to keep the label inside the box? Great,

0:13:33.556 --> 0:13:38.356
<v Speaker 1>but oftentimes consumers will throw that packaging label and then

0:13:38.596 --> 0:13:40.276
<v Speaker 1>a few days later they want to return it.

0:13:40.796 --> 0:13:41.436
<v Speaker 3>Where do they go?

0:13:41.556 --> 0:13:44.316
<v Speaker 1>They still need somewhere online to now get a QR

0:13:44.396 --> 0:13:46.836
<v Speaker 1>code or something to go handle there.

0:13:48.876 --> 0:13:51.276
<v Speaker 2>I feel like you're big an apologist for companies that

0:13:51.316 --> 0:13:54.556
<v Speaker 2>make it hard to return things. I thought you'd be

0:13:54.556 --> 0:13:55.476
<v Speaker 2>on my side on this.

0:13:55.396 --> 0:13:59.876
<v Speaker 1>One, and all I'm saying is beyond the products you're selling.

0:14:01.036 --> 0:14:05.116
<v Speaker 1>What kind of value add services and experiences you are offering,

0:14:05.396 --> 0:14:09.116
<v Speaker 1>Especially in our discussion, the same pair of Nike shoes

0:14:09.156 --> 0:14:11.876
<v Speaker 1>you can buy in half a dozen places. Where is

0:14:12.396 --> 0:14:16.556
<v Speaker 1>the company's value proposition there? That's the biggest question besides

0:14:16.596 --> 0:14:20.316
<v Speaker 1>the price. We discussed price is one key lever outside

0:14:20.356 --> 0:14:23.556
<v Speaker 1>of the price, where else otherwise it's race to the bottom.

0:14:24.236 --> 0:14:26.956
<v Speaker 3>Right, So you know that's the question.

0:14:27.116 --> 0:14:31.356
<v Speaker 1>So our piece is that, I know, using the technology

0:14:31.956 --> 0:14:34.716
<v Speaker 1>and then figuring out where do you want to actually

0:14:35.276 --> 0:14:39.156
<v Speaker 1>craft your policies, Whether you want to make it, you know, difficult,

0:14:40.036 --> 0:14:43.836
<v Speaker 1>or you want to make it more reasonable or extremely convenient. Right,

0:14:44.276 --> 0:14:48.596
<v Speaker 1>all those things are there, but underlining factor remains and

0:14:48.636 --> 0:14:53.076
<v Speaker 1>which is you you're calling out it costs money?

0:14:54.436 --> 0:15:06.236
<v Speaker 2>After the break, Amazon, Now back to the show. I've

0:15:06.236 --> 0:15:09.276
<v Speaker 2>thought of Amazon a lot in this conversation. You you

0:15:09.316 --> 0:15:11.796
<v Speaker 2>have done a lot for returns, you have a lot

0:15:11.796 --> 0:15:15.396
<v Speaker 2>of big clients. But Amazon is also very impressive in

0:15:15.476 --> 0:15:19.316
<v Speaker 2>terms of returns. What's something you've learned from watching and

0:15:19.436 --> 0:15:21.316
<v Speaker 2>in some ways competing with Amazon?

0:15:22.236 --> 0:15:24.036
<v Speaker 3>First off, we don't compete with Amazon.

0:15:24.076 --> 0:15:26.596
<v Speaker 1>We love Amazon because they set the standard and we

0:15:26.636 --> 0:15:29.196
<v Speaker 1>want to make sure we can democratize those standards and

0:15:29.636 --> 0:15:33.636
<v Speaker 1>giving that back choice and convenience for everybody. So it's

0:15:33.676 --> 0:15:37.276
<v Speaker 1>a level playing fields for all the brands and retailers

0:15:37.276 --> 0:15:38.236
<v Speaker 1>that they can leverage.

0:15:38.396 --> 0:15:41.036
<v Speaker 3>So there's nothing that we can do that, you know.

0:15:41.116 --> 0:15:43.516
<v Speaker 2>So you go to your clients and say, do you

0:15:43.556 --> 0:15:46.996
<v Speaker 2>want to be as good as Amazon on tracking and returns?

0:15:47.116 --> 0:15:48.196
<v Speaker 2>We can do that for you.

0:15:48.596 --> 0:15:52.676
<v Speaker 1>And nine out of ten conversations are, hey, I already shop,

0:15:52.796 --> 0:15:55.276
<v Speaker 1>I'm already a Prime member, and how do I offer

0:15:55.356 --> 0:15:58.636
<v Speaker 1>same similar services to my customers? So that's that is

0:15:58.676 --> 0:16:02.316
<v Speaker 1>absolutely absolutely the case. I mean the other piece I'm

0:16:02.356 --> 0:16:06.316
<v Speaker 1>saying that, you know, it's very impressive to see Amazon

0:16:06.636 --> 0:16:11.356
<v Speaker 1>offering these returns services at scale, not only just in

0:16:11.396 --> 0:16:14.596
<v Speaker 1>the US, they operate globally, right so, and it's just seeing,

0:16:15.036 --> 0:16:19.676
<v Speaker 1>you know, how you can offer these kind of programs.

0:16:19.676 --> 0:16:21.236
<v Speaker 1>It just has been quite impressive.

0:16:21.636 --> 0:16:24.156
<v Speaker 2>You know how hard it is. You truly know how hard.

0:16:23.996 --> 0:16:26.436
<v Speaker 3>It is to do. Absolutely absolutely, So.

0:16:26.556 --> 0:16:29.596
<v Speaker 2>I feel like there's an interesting maybe and maybe I'm

0:16:29.636 --> 0:16:33.276
<v Speaker 2>kind of reaching here, but there's like this bigger macroeconomic

0:16:33.356 --> 0:16:35.716
<v Speaker 2>idea that I'm curious about here, which is we've just

0:16:35.876 --> 0:16:39.356
<v Speaker 2>lived through this call it ten year period, you know,

0:16:39.476 --> 0:16:46.036
<v Speaker 2>basically the teens of zero interest rates, incredible inflow of

0:16:46.156 --> 0:16:51.396
<v Speaker 2>capital to tech companies, including e commerce companies, growth above

0:16:51.436 --> 0:16:53.756
<v Speaker 2>all else. Right, So this is a universe I feel

0:16:53.796 --> 0:16:58.596
<v Speaker 2>like where online retailers are just throwing free returns at

0:16:58.676 --> 0:17:00.676
<v Speaker 2>us and free shipping and they just want you to

0:17:00.676 --> 0:17:03.796
<v Speaker 2>buy and they don't care if you return. And so

0:17:03.836 --> 0:17:09.316
<v Speaker 2>the high costs of free returns could be absorbed in

0:17:09.356 --> 0:17:13.836
<v Speaker 2>that era. Now we're in this new era when interest

0:17:13.916 --> 0:17:16.836
<v Speaker 2>rates are not zero, when lots of tech companies have

0:17:16.956 --> 0:17:21.196
<v Speaker 2>become more interested in profits relative to growth. And so

0:17:21.236 --> 0:17:23.996
<v Speaker 2>I'm curious now that we've all been trained to just

0:17:24.156 --> 0:17:27.836
<v Speaker 2>expect free returns whenever we want it, Like our company

0:17:27.876 --> 0:17:30.036
<v Speaker 2>is going to stop giving us free returns now.

0:17:30.996 --> 0:17:33.236
<v Speaker 1>I can tell you hands down returns. This top of

0:17:33.316 --> 0:17:36.796
<v Speaker 1>mind for all the retailers. So now the question comes,

0:17:37.236 --> 0:17:41.316
<v Speaker 1>how do they actually really think about from the P

0:17:41.436 --> 0:17:44.156
<v Speaker 1>and L perspective, not just the consumer experience perspective.

0:17:44.196 --> 0:17:46.116
<v Speaker 3>How do you bring the P and L perspective to

0:17:46.196 --> 0:17:47.196
<v Speaker 3>really do that and.

0:17:47.596 --> 0:17:53.876
<v Speaker 1>All profit and loss absolutely, Now, whether they're going to

0:17:53.956 --> 0:17:56.916
<v Speaker 1>make it harder, are they going to actually.

0:17:58.036 --> 0:18:00.156
<v Speaker 3>You know, charge more to the consumers?

0:18:00.476 --> 0:18:02.396
<v Speaker 1>I can make it, you can return it, but it's

0:18:02.396 --> 0:18:05.436
<v Speaker 1>going to cost you, right, That's where the conversation is

0:18:05.436 --> 0:18:05.796
<v Speaker 1>going to go.

0:18:06.156 --> 0:18:08.036
<v Speaker 3>And that is what exactly is happening in the market.

0:18:08.996 --> 0:18:12.276
<v Speaker 2>So it is more retailers are in fact charging for

0:18:12.356 --> 0:18:14.836
<v Speaker 2>return that is true. Are there ways the world of

0:18:15.156 --> 0:18:19.876
<v Speaker 2>returns might look significantly different in five years in terms

0:18:19.916 --> 0:18:22.196
<v Speaker 2>of how we can return stuff, what it might cost,

0:18:22.476 --> 0:18:25.516
<v Speaker 2>the technologies you know, on the on the back end,

0:18:26.116 --> 0:18:27.316
<v Speaker 2>what might be different.

0:18:27.636 --> 0:18:29.756
<v Speaker 1>In next three to five years out as we see it.

0:18:29.796 --> 0:18:33.556
<v Speaker 1>And that's not a typical that's a very common consumer

0:18:34.796 --> 0:18:37.796
<v Speaker 1>surprise factor, but they do not know the impact and

0:18:37.916 --> 0:18:42.676
<v Speaker 1>the you know, the size of returns economy where we

0:18:42.756 --> 0:18:48.356
<v Speaker 1>see that transparency is needed for creating that education and

0:18:48.396 --> 0:18:52.476
<v Speaker 1>awareness what happens to returns when they are sent back.

0:18:52.716 --> 0:18:55.556
<v Speaker 3>So consumers are being a little bit more mindful, you.

0:18:55.596 --> 0:18:57.876
<v Speaker 2>Mean, companies are going to try and talk us out

0:18:57.956 --> 0:19:00.716
<v Speaker 2>in a nice way of returning so much stuff. Companies

0:19:00.716 --> 0:19:02.596
<v Speaker 2>is gonna be like, do you really really are you

0:19:02.676 --> 0:19:04.756
<v Speaker 2>sure you want to return those shoes? You can't, but

0:19:04.836 --> 0:19:06.756
<v Speaker 2>think about it, like, is that what you're saying?

0:19:07.476 --> 0:19:10.996
<v Speaker 1>Maybe if consumers are aware of how much they buy,

0:19:11.156 --> 0:19:14.036
<v Speaker 1>how much that goes into landfill, how much is actually

0:19:14.836 --> 0:19:18.756
<v Speaker 1>circulated back in the economy, and that's where there has

0:19:18.836 --> 0:19:21.396
<v Speaker 1>to be certain areas. I believe in next three to

0:19:21.436 --> 0:19:24.916
<v Speaker 1>five years there will be more transparency. Education awareness is

0:19:24.996 --> 0:19:27.676
<v Speaker 1>needed in this whole area of returns and exchanges.

0:19:28.356 --> 0:19:31.716
<v Speaker 2>Well, I mean, if you really want to make a

0:19:31.716 --> 0:19:37.076
<v Speaker 2>sustainability argument, the argument is buy less stuff. But I

0:19:37.076 --> 0:19:39.076
<v Speaker 2>don't think the ecover sites are going to give us

0:19:39.076 --> 0:19:39.516
<v Speaker 2>that one.

0:19:40.436 --> 0:19:45.276
<v Speaker 1>Well, you are correct, but there are example is Patagonia.

0:19:45.636 --> 0:19:49.436
<v Speaker 2>Yes, Patagonia is an atypical company, which, by the way,

0:19:49.596 --> 0:19:50.556
<v Speaker 2>charges for return.

0:19:50.636 --> 0:19:54.796
<v Speaker 1>That's right, you know, twenty five years ago Zappos was

0:19:54.916 --> 0:19:59.356
<v Speaker 1>atypical and here we are. So we need more companies

0:19:59.396 --> 0:20:02.756
<v Speaker 1>like Patagonian others who are atypical now to create that

0:20:02.956 --> 0:20:05.836
<v Speaker 1>education and awareness in the market. Whether that changes the

0:20:05.956 --> 0:20:10.076
<v Speaker 1>consumer sentiment or not in a we all will find

0:20:10.076 --> 0:20:12.276
<v Speaker 1>out in five years time. But all I'm saying is

0:20:12.276 --> 0:20:14.996
<v Speaker 1>that if you want to change that equation in a

0:20:15.036 --> 0:20:18.276
<v Speaker 1>meaningful fashion, we need to have a much, you know,

0:20:19.196 --> 0:20:22.036
<v Speaker 1>much broader discussion with consumer base.

0:20:22.476 --> 0:20:26.236
<v Speaker 2>Interesting. So it's like the pendulum has been swinging for

0:20:26.356 --> 0:20:30.716
<v Speaker 2>twenty years towards just return return, free returns, easy to return.

0:20:31.076 --> 0:20:33.556
<v Speaker 2>You're saying the pendulum is already starting to swing the

0:20:33.636 --> 0:20:36.356
<v Speaker 2>other way. Don't return so much stuff. Maybe we're going

0:20:36.436 --> 0:20:38.876
<v Speaker 2>to charge you if you return your stuff. You should

0:20:38.956 --> 0:20:41.636
<v Speaker 2>really think about the environmental impact of returning your stuff.

0:20:41.796 --> 0:20:44.236
<v Speaker 2>The pendulum is going to keep swinging away, and we'll

0:20:45.236 --> 0:20:49.436
<v Speaker 2>return less stuff in five years, perhaps a smaller percentage

0:20:49.436 --> 0:20:51.036
<v Speaker 2>of the stuff today returns.

0:20:51.876 --> 0:20:54.116
<v Speaker 1>And as you mentioned, there's a hidden cost of returns

0:20:54.116 --> 0:20:57.676
<v Speaker 1>which is not transparent. So why won't we have a

0:20:57.716 --> 0:21:02.356
<v Speaker 1>transparent conversation. You're getting a service and in exchange right now,

0:21:02.396 --> 0:21:05.556
<v Speaker 1>there's a hidden fee of exchange. Why wouldn't we make

0:21:05.556 --> 0:21:08.156
<v Speaker 1>it much more open and transparent about it. That's what

0:21:08.196 --> 0:21:10.476
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying about on that dobby.

0:21:10.636 --> 0:21:13.476
<v Speaker 2>So, so returns aren't free now. They're included in the price,

0:21:13.556 --> 0:21:15.476
<v Speaker 2>and people who return a lot of stuff drive up

0:21:15.516 --> 0:21:18.076
<v Speaker 2>the price for everybody. Exactly if you had to pay

0:21:18.076 --> 0:21:19.876
<v Speaker 2>for returns, then it would be way more fair.

0:21:20.516 --> 0:21:23.836
<v Speaker 3>That's right, right, So, and again is this the show.

0:21:23.676 --> 0:21:26.276
<v Speaker 2>Where we're declaring Can we declare the end of the

0:21:26.316 --> 0:21:29.236
<v Speaker 2>free returns era? Can we say that it's over?

0:21:29.596 --> 0:21:32.476
<v Speaker 1>I would say for sure, twenty twenty three will be

0:21:32.556 --> 0:21:34.356
<v Speaker 1>the end of free returns era?

0:21:34.596 --> 0:21:34.836
<v Speaker 2>Wow?

0:21:34.916 --> 0:21:36.716
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, absolutely, without a doubt.

0:21:37.276 --> 0:21:44.516
<v Speaker 2>Okay, okay, we'll be back in a minute with the

0:21:44.596 --> 0:21:56.476
<v Speaker 2>lightning round. Back to the show. Let's close with the

0:21:56.556 --> 0:21:59.716
<v Speaker 2>lightning round. I'll let you go very soon. What's the

0:21:59.796 --> 0:22:01.036
<v Speaker 2>last thing you returned?

0:22:02.596 --> 0:22:07.116
<v Speaker 3>Last thing that I return? Actually, you know it's a

0:22:07.156 --> 0:22:10.396
<v Speaker 3>pain up shoes that just didn't fit.

0:22:12.556 --> 0:22:14.916
<v Speaker 2>What's the worst possible thing I can return from the

0:22:14.956 --> 0:22:17.596
<v Speaker 2>point of view of the company, Like, what's really bad

0:22:17.636 --> 0:22:18.796
<v Speaker 2>for companies if I return?

0:22:20.076 --> 0:22:21.116
<v Speaker 3>If you return.

0:22:22.556 --> 0:22:27.236
<v Speaker 1>A dining table or a couch or a much bigger item,

0:22:28.036 --> 0:22:31.756
<v Speaker 1>it requires not only a you know, a lot of

0:22:31.796 --> 0:22:33.956
<v Speaker 1>coordination to come and pick it up, but you know

0:22:33.996 --> 0:22:35.796
<v Speaker 1>it costs even a lot more money as well.

0:22:36.836 --> 0:22:38.836
<v Speaker 2>What's one thing you learned working at Apple.

0:22:40.476 --> 0:22:42.756
<v Speaker 3>Maniacal focus on the finest details.

0:22:43.236 --> 0:22:45.516
<v Speaker 2>What's one thing you learned working at Walmart?

0:22:47.276 --> 0:22:52.436
<v Speaker 1>I mean the true league adding value and that's in

0:22:52.476 --> 0:22:56.076
<v Speaker 1>their tagline, you know, save money, Live better.

0:22:57.676 --> 0:23:00.876
<v Speaker 2>One more question and this one goes back, goes back.

0:23:00.876 --> 0:23:04.036
<v Speaker 2>Aways in your career in the original dot com boom,

0:23:04.436 --> 0:23:07.596
<v Speaker 2>you you started a startup that failed, and because you

0:23:07.596 --> 0:23:10.276
<v Speaker 2>were on a work visa at the time, you basically

0:23:10.716 --> 0:23:12.556
<v Speaker 2>had to go back to India. You wound up going

0:23:12.596 --> 0:23:15.596
<v Speaker 2>back to India and I'm curious. Was it a hard

0:23:15.676 --> 0:23:17.956
<v Speaker 2>call to come back to the US after that?

0:23:18.756 --> 0:23:20.596
<v Speaker 3>No, honestly, it was not a hard call.

0:23:20.716 --> 0:23:24.716
<v Speaker 1>I mean, and back in two thousands and and and

0:23:24.836 --> 0:23:32.316
<v Speaker 1>even now, you know all the technological advances and an entrepreneurship.

0:23:32.396 --> 0:23:34.956
<v Speaker 3>I mean, the US has been in the forefront of it.

0:23:35.036 --> 0:23:38.556
<v Speaker 1>So if you want to learn something or make a difference,

0:23:39.156 --> 0:23:41.996
<v Speaker 1>US is the land of opportunities, at least in the

0:23:42.036 --> 0:23:44.516
<v Speaker 1>in the world that you know we are in commerce

0:23:44.556 --> 0:23:52.556
<v Speaker 1>and technology or or any kind of startup work.

0:23:53.116 --> 0:23:58.116
<v Speaker 2>Amate Sharma is the founder and CEO of Narvar. Today's

0:23:58.156 --> 0:24:01.636
<v Speaker 2>show was produced by Gabriel Hunter Chang and Edith Russolo.

0:24:01.836 --> 0:24:05.996
<v Speaker 2>It was edited by Sarah Nix and engineered by Amanda k. Wong.

0:24:06.476 --> 0:24:10.636
<v Speaker 2>You can email us at problem at pushkin. You can

0:24:10.676 --> 0:24:13.956
<v Speaker 2>find me on Twitter at Jacob Goldstein. I'm Jacob Goldstein.

0:24:13.996 --> 0:24:16.116
<v Speaker 2>And we'll be back next week with another episode of

0:24:16.156 --> 0:24:23.076
<v Speaker 2>What's Your Problem.