WEBVTT - Full interview w/ Rep. Chris Deluzio - Why We Need To “Trump-Proof” The Presidency

0:00:05.000 --> 0:00:07.640
<v Speaker 1>And joining me now is a member of Congress from

0:00:07.640 --> 0:00:12.080
<v Speaker 1>western Pennsylvania, which is probably as important of a swing

0:00:12.400 --> 0:00:15.920
<v Speaker 1>geographic area as there is in the country. It's Congressman Christallusio.

0:00:15.960 --> 0:00:19.200
<v Speaker 1>He's from the seventeenth district. And for political junkies when

0:00:19.239 --> 0:00:21.640
<v Speaker 1>they think of PA seventeen, the first name they may

0:00:21.640 --> 0:00:25.280
<v Speaker 1>come to mind is Connor Lamb. Well, Christi Luzio replaced

0:00:25.280 --> 0:00:29.000
<v Speaker 1>Connor Lamb in Congress. It is mostly that district, And

0:00:29.000 --> 0:00:32.640
<v Speaker 1>in fact, i'll make that your first question, Congressman, how

0:00:32.720 --> 0:00:36.400
<v Speaker 1>much does it you know that famous PA seventeen race

0:00:36.440 --> 0:00:38.840
<v Speaker 1>at the time was a big deal because it leaned

0:00:38.880 --> 0:00:43.200
<v Speaker 1>more Republican in the teens. How much of your district

0:00:43.320 --> 0:00:44.640
<v Speaker 1>is the same? How much of it's different?

0:00:45.080 --> 0:00:48.559
<v Speaker 2>You know, when Connor first won that special election, big offset, right,

0:00:48.880 --> 0:00:53.400
<v Speaker 2>he really won that seat, captured the country's attention. Pennsylvania

0:00:53.440 --> 0:00:56.880
<v Speaker 2>Supreme Court drew fair maps after that there was a

0:00:56.880 --> 0:01:00.960
<v Speaker 2>Republican gerrymander. So the district that he represented from really

0:01:01.040 --> 0:01:04.120
<v Speaker 2>twenty eighteen on very similar to mine. It maybe a

0:01:04.160 --> 0:01:08.399
<v Speaker 2>point or so different. All of Beaver County, about half

0:01:08.440 --> 0:01:11.720
<v Speaker 2>Alleghany County, which for Eddie folks who know Pennsylvania that's

0:01:11.720 --> 0:01:14.760
<v Speaker 2>the County of Pittsburgh in so it's a I don't know,

0:01:14.800 --> 0:01:16.360
<v Speaker 2>the best district in the country if you ask me,

0:01:16.400 --> 0:01:18.720
<v Speaker 2>but it's competitive, it's got a mix of everything. It's

0:01:18.800 --> 0:01:20.720
<v Speaker 2>really a great part of the world.

0:01:20.880 --> 0:01:22.520
<v Speaker 3>Well, you grew up there, so you know this.

0:01:22.720 --> 0:01:25.280
<v Speaker 1>You know, there was the I don't know whether the

0:01:25.400 --> 0:01:28.600
<v Speaker 1>infamous saying James Carvell once said about Pennsylvania, which is

0:01:28.640 --> 0:01:31.400
<v Speaker 1>no longer true, but it used to be. He'd say,

0:01:31.600 --> 0:01:33.920
<v Speaker 1>just for political purposes, Philadelphia and the east, Pittsburgh and

0:01:33.920 --> 0:01:35.160
<v Speaker 1>the west, and Alabama in the middle.

0:01:35.800 --> 0:01:36.920
<v Speaker 3>And the point.

0:01:36.680 --> 0:01:39.360
<v Speaker 1>He was making is that, as you know, the Democrats

0:01:39.400 --> 0:01:42.920
<v Speaker 1>needed to care about the two coasts of Pennsylvania, you know,

0:01:43.080 --> 0:01:43.920
<v Speaker 1>putting coasts.

0:01:43.959 --> 0:01:48.160
<v Speaker 3>In plural there. But the fact of the matter is, you.

0:01:48.120 --> 0:01:51.880
<v Speaker 1>Know, as the Pennsylvania, as the Philly suburbs, became more democratic,

0:01:52.800 --> 0:01:57.000
<v Speaker 1>the reason the state didn't become a lot more democratic

0:01:57.080 --> 0:02:01.600
<v Speaker 1>is that western Pennsylvania, the Pittsburgh market, became much less democratic.

0:02:01.640 --> 0:02:05.800
<v Speaker 1>That is, your childhood to adulthood, walk me through that chain,

0:02:06.040 --> 0:02:08.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, tell me how your community.

0:02:08.560 --> 0:02:10.280
<v Speaker 3>Sort of swung there.

0:02:10.320 --> 0:02:13.880
<v Speaker 1>From there, I would argue Reagan Democrats to Clinton Democrats,

0:02:14.400 --> 0:02:17.200
<v Speaker 1>to even some Obama Democrats to now Trump Republicans.

0:02:17.880 --> 0:02:20.519
<v Speaker 2>I think a big part of that story the factory

0:02:20.560 --> 0:02:23.680
<v Speaker 2>towns and the rural communities, right And the factory towns

0:02:24.120 --> 0:02:27.480
<v Speaker 2>you drive along the rivers in my district, especially through

0:02:27.480 --> 0:02:30.919
<v Speaker 2>Beaver County on the Ohio River and the Beaver those

0:02:31.280 --> 0:02:34.960
<v Speaker 2>there are still great manufacturing jobs that anchor.

0:02:34.720 --> 0:02:35.720
<v Speaker 3>A lot of those communities.

0:02:36.160 --> 0:02:39.080
<v Speaker 2>And I think as you saw those jobs go away

0:02:39.120 --> 0:02:42.960
<v Speaker 2>in a lot of what's southwestern Pennsylvania, you saw political realignments,

0:02:42.960 --> 0:02:45.960
<v Speaker 2>You saw anger and frustration at how that happened. And

0:02:46.080 --> 0:02:50.080
<v Speaker 2>also where you see Democrats like me who are winning

0:02:50.120 --> 0:02:53.960
<v Speaker 2>and overperforming, and those kinds of communities we're winning and overperforming,

0:02:54.240 --> 0:02:57.640
<v Speaker 2>and those exact types of towns, and the same story.

0:02:57.639 --> 0:03:00.720
<v Speaker 2>If you look at John Fetterman's win, Josh Heroes win,

0:03:01.120 --> 0:03:03.480
<v Speaker 2>you look at what happened in the Senate race last

0:03:03.560 --> 0:03:07.760
<v Speaker 2>year with Bob Casey and Dave McCormick, the margins in

0:03:07.840 --> 0:03:09.959
<v Speaker 2>my part of Pennsylvania, in those factory towns, in the

0:03:10.000 --> 0:03:13.120
<v Speaker 2>rural communities, I think made the difference. It shows in

0:03:13.160 --> 0:03:16.080
<v Speaker 2>those races who can do a little better when they're

0:03:16.280 --> 0:03:17.120
<v Speaker 2>even losing.

0:03:16.840 --> 0:03:18.320
<v Speaker 3>Those counties or losing those towns to.

0:03:18.320 --> 0:03:21.440
<v Speaker 1>Eat out a win. Did you over perform Casey? Yes,

0:03:22.680 --> 0:03:25.560
<v Speaker 1>who's the McCormick Deluzio voter.

0:03:27.040 --> 0:03:32.640
<v Speaker 2>There's a state House district Beaver County, communities like Ambridge,

0:03:32.639 --> 0:03:36.640
<v Speaker 2>al Equippa, Beaver Falls. Rob Matzey's the state rep there

0:03:36.640 --> 0:03:39.360
<v Speaker 2>and that state House district he won it. I won it,

0:03:39.680 --> 0:03:43.840
<v Speaker 2>and Dave McCormick won it, and it's an interesting story, right,

0:03:43.880 --> 0:03:46.680
<v Speaker 2>and Donald Trump won that district too. And you know,

0:03:46.720 --> 0:03:48.680
<v Speaker 2>I think if you spent time in that part of

0:03:48.880 --> 0:03:51.920
<v Speaker 2>my district, I think you talk to the voters who

0:03:51.960 --> 0:03:54.080
<v Speaker 2>might have voted that way, voted for me, or voted

0:03:54.080 --> 0:03:56.760
<v Speaker 2>for Rob Matsy and maybe voted above us as Republican.

0:03:57.960 --> 0:04:00.119
<v Speaker 2>Always hard to summarize, but these were folks who are

0:04:00.160 --> 0:04:03.560
<v Speaker 2>fired up and angry about costs one good jobs. I

0:04:03.560 --> 0:04:06.400
<v Speaker 2>think the economic fight was front center, and they heard

0:04:06.400 --> 0:04:09.760
<v Speaker 2>from me since I ran in twenty twenty two. Always

0:04:09.800 --> 0:04:14.600
<v Speaker 2>an economic fight at the heart of it. Again, hard

0:04:14.600 --> 0:04:17.280
<v Speaker 2>to summarize voter by voter, but they exist, and it's

0:04:17.279 --> 0:04:20.279
<v Speaker 2>that part of my district really where it made the

0:04:20.279 --> 0:04:23.280
<v Speaker 2>difference for me and certainly above us in the ballot.

0:04:23.640 --> 0:04:26.520
<v Speaker 1>So you operate that there are swing voters, there are

0:04:26.920 --> 0:04:29.200
<v Speaker 1>there are not everybody agrees that there are right that

0:04:29.240 --> 0:04:31.160
<v Speaker 1>there's two. I always say there are two types of

0:04:31.160 --> 0:04:35.120
<v Speaker 1>swing voters. I do think there are voters that facillate

0:04:35.200 --> 0:04:41.200
<v Speaker 1>between party strategically, but far more often the most common

0:04:41.200 --> 0:04:43.599
<v Speaker 1>swing voter is somebody that swings between voting and not voting.

0:04:45.120 --> 0:04:47.920
<v Speaker 2>So I think both things are true, and I don't

0:04:47.920 --> 0:04:50.560
<v Speaker 2>want to oversay that it's just, Hey, you can convince

0:04:50.600 --> 0:04:54.559
<v Speaker 2>someone to vote Republican for president Democrat for the US House.

0:04:55.040 --> 0:04:56.720
<v Speaker 2>It's the other thing to believe. I mean, we have

0:04:56.800 --> 0:05:00.880
<v Speaker 2>work to do on turnout and frankly, rebuilding some of

0:05:00.880 --> 0:05:03.000
<v Speaker 2>the trust with younger voters. I mean, I'm forty one,

0:05:03.520 --> 0:05:05.960
<v Speaker 2>makes me an older millennial, right, so I guess I

0:05:06.040 --> 0:05:09.200
<v Speaker 2>can't call myself a young voter anymore. We'll see, but

0:05:09.360 --> 0:05:11.480
<v Speaker 2>I do think there are folks who will split ticket.

0:05:11.520 --> 0:05:12.400
<v Speaker 3>I saw it in my election.

0:05:12.960 --> 0:05:16.480
<v Speaker 2>I saw it with the vote drop off from presidential

0:05:16.920 --> 0:05:20.040
<v Speaker 2>right Harris Trump, Casey McCormick down to my race. I mean,

0:05:20.080 --> 0:05:23.160
<v Speaker 2>they exist, and you got to get you got to

0:05:23.200 --> 0:05:23.719
<v Speaker 2>know your district.

0:05:23.760 --> 0:05:25.440
<v Speaker 3>You gotta have candidates who know their districts.

0:05:25.800 --> 0:05:28.840
<v Speaker 2>I come back to I think the economic fight, not

0:05:28.880 --> 0:05:31.880
<v Speaker 2>the expense of anything else, but fighting on the economic

0:05:31.920 --> 0:05:35.120
<v Speaker 2>front principally is a good way to earn those votes.

0:05:35.680 --> 0:05:37.000
<v Speaker 2>And you don't have to be a whip about it.

0:05:37.400 --> 0:05:39.520
<v Speaker 2>You don't have to be backtracking on anything else. I

0:05:39.520 --> 0:05:41.880
<v Speaker 2>think it's the part of the path for Democrats to

0:05:42.800 --> 0:05:45.799
<v Speaker 2>win more consistently in places like western Pennsylvania.

0:05:45.839 --> 0:05:49.960
<v Speaker 1>Look, it's an eighty percent. Nobody likes concentrations of power, right,

0:05:50.040 --> 0:05:55.600
<v Speaker 1>that's an eighty percent. You know, people, you know recoil

0:05:55.720 --> 0:05:59.839
<v Speaker 1>from too much power, too much concentration of power, government corporations, whatever.

0:06:00.040 --> 0:06:03.080
<v Speaker 1>So if you're talking about the economy in those terms,

0:06:03.520 --> 0:06:06.280
<v Speaker 1>it does strike me that you can have a conversation.

0:06:06.360 --> 0:06:08.840
<v Speaker 3>How much does the D next to your name make

0:06:08.880 --> 0:06:09.360
<v Speaker 3>it harder?

0:06:09.400 --> 0:06:12.159
<v Speaker 1>I had a couple of independent candidates now they're running

0:06:12.160 --> 0:06:16.279
<v Speaker 1>an Idaho in South Dakota. This is not Western Pennsylvania, Okay,

0:06:16.720 --> 0:06:20.160
<v Speaker 1>but they they said not having the D next and

0:06:20.240 --> 0:06:23.320
<v Speaker 1>then their name actually was an impediment to having the

0:06:23.360 --> 0:06:27.120
<v Speaker 1>conversation with some voters about the economy. Moving to an

0:06:27.240 --> 0:06:29.880
<v Speaker 1>eye next to their name at least opened the door

0:06:29.920 --> 0:06:30.680
<v Speaker 1>to a conversation.

0:06:31.880 --> 0:06:34.120
<v Speaker 2>Doublass, I mean, I'll tell you at least and from

0:06:34.120 --> 0:06:36.720
<v Speaker 2>my part of the world, and again, like it's different everywhere.

0:06:37.040 --> 0:06:37.200
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:06:37.240 --> 0:06:39.120
<v Speaker 2>You know, some of the folks in some of those

0:06:39.160 --> 0:06:42.760
<v Speaker 2>factory towns maybe for generations, were Democrats and they've left

0:06:42.960 --> 0:06:45.840
<v Speaker 2>my party, right, And so I'm trying to rebuild some

0:06:45.880 --> 0:06:48.280
<v Speaker 2>trust and reconnect.

0:06:47.800 --> 0:06:48.920
<v Speaker 3>With those new deal routes.

0:06:49.200 --> 0:06:52.160
<v Speaker 2>For why for three four generations your family might have

0:06:52.240 --> 0:06:55.640
<v Speaker 2>been a Union household, you may have been voting Democrat

0:06:55.640 --> 0:06:57.800
<v Speaker 2>and at the same time picking up.

0:06:57.720 --> 0:06:59.920
<v Speaker 3>And earning new two votes. And say, the.

0:07:00.080 --> 0:07:03.279
<v Speaker 2>Suburban parts of a district like mine, right, where folks

0:07:03.560 --> 0:07:08.320
<v Speaker 2>aren't as longer as long term Democrats who are coming

0:07:08.360 --> 0:07:10.680
<v Speaker 2>in to the party, those things can be attention. But

0:07:10.720 --> 0:07:12.960
<v Speaker 2>we can't find a way to do both of those things.

0:07:13.000 --> 0:07:15.080
<v Speaker 2>We're not going to win, nor can the Republicans. By

0:07:15.160 --> 0:07:18.760
<v Speaker 2>the way, that's the reality of political train here. And

0:07:18.840 --> 0:07:21.240
<v Speaker 2>you know, I think for my party's brand to be seen,

0:07:21.320 --> 0:07:24.360
<v Speaker 2>number one is tougher, right, And it's not just about

0:07:24.560 --> 0:07:27.200
<v Speaker 2>what's happening in Washington and being tough with Trump and

0:07:27.240 --> 0:07:29.720
<v Speaker 2>his administration, as we should be, but tougher on the

0:07:29.760 --> 0:07:33.840
<v Speaker 2>economic fight, which every survey I see, every conversation I have,

0:07:34.600 --> 0:07:37.360
<v Speaker 2>it comes up. Folks are mad about the cost of living.

0:07:37.360 --> 0:07:39.840
<v Speaker 2>I think for a party to be seen tougher. There

0:07:40.480 --> 0:07:42.480
<v Speaker 2>would help some of those folks you're talking about, say

0:07:42.480 --> 0:07:45.800
<v Speaker 2>in Idaho, where they don't have some deep democratic loyalty

0:07:45.800 --> 0:07:47.920
<v Speaker 2>to build on, to try to restore some crusts.

0:07:47.960 --> 0:07:49.240
<v Speaker 3>I think it helps with those guys too.

0:07:50.800 --> 0:07:53.360
<v Speaker 1>You've spent time in the Navy, and you're a lawyer.

0:07:55.360 --> 0:07:58.680
<v Speaker 1>You went to Georgetown Law School. Why'd you decide on

0:07:58.720 --> 0:07:59.360
<v Speaker 1>public service?

0:08:00.640 --> 0:08:02.320
<v Speaker 3>So I was a senior in high school.

0:08:02.520 --> 0:08:05.960
<v Speaker 2>Nine to eleven happens, and I was pursuing the Naval Academy.

0:08:06.160 --> 0:08:08.720
<v Speaker 2>I mean that day sealed it that if I got in,

0:08:08.800 --> 0:08:12.480
<v Speaker 2>I go. And I got in pretty shortly thereafter, and

0:08:12.520 --> 0:08:17.080
<v Speaker 2>I went, And it's a tough place, it's a special place.

0:08:18.120 --> 0:08:21.120
<v Speaker 2>I really internalized, you know, the mission of what we

0:08:21.280 --> 0:08:23.640
<v Speaker 2>signed up to do there, which is a lifetime of service,

0:08:23.920 --> 0:08:28.280
<v Speaker 2>whether that's in uniform or public service. We talk about

0:08:28.360 --> 0:08:31.360
<v Speaker 2>citizenship even and so I just believe it deeply. That's

0:08:31.360 --> 0:08:33.559
<v Speaker 2>who I am. It's the part of the world I'm from.

0:08:34.200 --> 0:08:36.920
<v Speaker 2>You drive down most of the streets in western Pennsylvania,

0:08:36.920 --> 0:08:40.199
<v Speaker 2>main streets, you see banners honoring veterans in a lot

0:08:40.200 --> 0:08:44.160
<v Speaker 2>of communities. You walk into nearly any house in my

0:08:44.280 --> 0:08:46.520
<v Speaker 2>part of the world. Someone's got a picture of somebody

0:08:46.559 --> 0:08:49.600
<v Speaker 2>in uniform, like, we value that, and that's it. That's

0:08:49.640 --> 0:08:51.840
<v Speaker 2>the shorthandswer for why I'm trying to do something in

0:08:51.880 --> 0:08:54.959
<v Speaker 2>public service, why I think this is a noble pursuit.

0:08:55.000 --> 0:08:58.600
<v Speaker 2>And that's even before I get into the stress the

0:08:58.640 --> 0:09:00.800
<v Speaker 2>country is under. What I think Ronald Trump and his

0:09:00.880 --> 0:09:04.440
<v Speaker 2>movement is doing. It's real, it's profound, and I think,

0:09:04.480 --> 0:09:06.280
<v Speaker 2>if not now to try to step up and do

0:09:06.360 --> 0:09:09.400
<v Speaker 2>something about it when it feels like this is the

0:09:09.440 --> 0:09:11.320
<v Speaker 2>moment to try to serve and that's that's what I'm

0:09:11.480 --> 0:09:12.280
<v Speaker 2>trying to do in this.

0:09:13.400 --> 0:09:14.319
<v Speaker 3>So it is.

0:09:15.960 --> 0:09:18.720
<v Speaker 1>It's quite a moment, right, It's a There are times

0:09:18.760 --> 0:09:24.920
<v Speaker 1>that I know I feel powerless, but I'm not an

0:09:24.960 --> 0:09:27.880
<v Speaker 1>elective office. But you're in the minority, which sometimes means

0:09:28.559 --> 0:09:31.200
<v Speaker 1>you're also can be more powerless than you'd like to be.

0:09:34.000 --> 0:09:36.520
<v Speaker 1>It is, you know, every week I can put together

0:09:36.559 --> 0:09:39.400
<v Speaker 1>a list of stories that says, boy, this feels this

0:09:39.480 --> 0:09:44.520
<v Speaker 1>feels like we're are we are? We did we really

0:09:44.559 --> 0:09:46.280
<v Speaker 1>just take the wrong fork in the road. How the

0:09:46.320 --> 0:09:49.880
<v Speaker 1>hell are we going to get back? And then it

0:09:50.120 --> 0:09:55.840
<v Speaker 1>like and then we go even further, right, how do

0:09:55.920 --> 0:09:58.240
<v Speaker 1>you answer that? Question, what's the state of the democracy

0:09:58.280 --> 0:09:59.720
<v Speaker 1>and how concerned should we be.

0:10:00.840 --> 0:10:01.720
<v Speaker 3>I am concerned.

0:10:02.160 --> 0:10:05.440
<v Speaker 2>I think it's healthy and normal insane to look around

0:10:05.480 --> 0:10:08.560
<v Speaker 2>and say something's not right. And it's not just the

0:10:08.600 --> 0:10:11.680
<v Speaker 2>political violence, which of course is a problem, and I

0:10:11.679 --> 0:10:15.439
<v Speaker 2>think a symptom of a deeper wound to be American psyche.

0:10:15.040 --> 0:10:15.880
<v Speaker 3>That we got to fix.

0:10:16.080 --> 0:10:19.520
<v Speaker 2>And I think about now, I can criticize Donald Trump,

0:10:19.559 --> 0:10:21.880
<v Speaker 2>and I will. Right, He's identified that wound, and he

0:10:22.000 --> 0:10:28.680
<v Speaker 2>offers to me snake oil, right, division, autocracy, threats to

0:10:28.840 --> 0:10:32.360
<v Speaker 2>the rule of law. Okay, let's criticize that. But then

0:10:32.400 --> 0:10:34.079
<v Speaker 2>what do we have to offer that's different?

0:10:34.120 --> 0:10:36.720
<v Speaker 3>But he does identify the problems, and I think we

0:10:36.800 --> 0:10:38.040
<v Speaker 3>have to start with that. That's right.

0:10:38.520 --> 0:10:41.040
<v Speaker 1>Like this is where I think sometimes you know that

0:10:41.200 --> 0:10:45.599
<v Speaker 1>there are some Just because Trump has identified a problem correctly,

0:10:46.520 --> 0:10:49.720
<v Speaker 1>doesn't you know, doesn't mean it's not a problem. Right,

0:10:49.800 --> 0:10:52.559
<v Speaker 1>just because Trump says it's a problem, you shouldn't ignore it.

0:10:53.240 --> 0:10:54.120
<v Speaker 3>And I've always said that.

0:10:54.200 --> 0:10:58.240
<v Speaker 1>I think the voters when they when they sour on Trump,

0:10:58.320 --> 0:11:02.480
<v Speaker 1>they don't sour on the problems he's identified. They sour

0:11:02.559 --> 0:11:03.480
<v Speaker 1>on his solutions.

0:11:04.440 --> 0:11:06.959
<v Speaker 2>So I'm forty one, and we can look at this

0:11:07.080 --> 0:11:09.760
<v Speaker 2>data pretty quickly. If you're my age, you're younger, you're

0:11:09.760 --> 0:11:12.280
<v Speaker 2>now the first Americans since at least the Second World

0:11:12.320 --> 0:11:14.440
<v Speaker 2>War who don't expect me better off than your parents.

0:11:14.960 --> 0:11:18.959
<v Speaker 2>That is a failure of our government, across parties, across decades.

0:11:19.080 --> 0:11:22.480
<v Speaker 2>That's multiple presidents think of that, and you should be

0:11:22.520 --> 0:11:25.480
<v Speaker 2>mad about that. I'm mad about that. If you're younger

0:11:25.480 --> 0:11:28.119
<v Speaker 2>than me, you're even angrier about it because the prospects

0:11:28.160 --> 0:11:32.920
<v Speaker 2>look worse, and so we have to confront that. That

0:11:32.960 --> 0:11:36.360
<v Speaker 2>goes to the fundamental trust or distrust in our government.

0:11:36.800 --> 0:11:36.920
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:11:36.960 --> 0:11:38.800
<v Speaker 2>If you're going to work hard and follow the rules

0:11:39.120 --> 0:11:41.360
<v Speaker 2>and you still can't afford your life, you are mad

0:11:41.679 --> 0:11:43.560
<v Speaker 2>and maybe you don't trust the way our governments work.

0:11:43.640 --> 0:11:48.199
<v Speaker 2>So to me, I think battling corruption, rebuilding trust, putting

0:11:48.320 --> 0:11:50.840
<v Speaker 2>muscle back in the American dream, those things are all linked.

0:11:51.400 --> 0:11:54.199
<v Speaker 2>It's part of why the anti corruption fight matters so

0:11:54.280 --> 0:11:56.640
<v Speaker 2>much to me. It's part of why this vision of

0:11:56.640 --> 0:12:01.920
<v Speaker 2>economic patriotism mine others are talking about matters putting muscle

0:12:02.120 --> 0:12:04.760
<v Speaker 2>and something real back in the American dream. Because if

0:12:05.160 --> 0:12:08.160
<v Speaker 2>if we're going to just pay lip service to try

0:12:08.200 --> 0:12:12.360
<v Speaker 2>and to restore trust without fixing the problem underlying our system.

0:12:12.800 --> 0:12:15.960
<v Speaker 1>It's not going to work in my voot. How do

0:12:16.000 --> 0:12:19.440
<v Speaker 1>you feel about the redistricting wars? I say this because look,

0:12:19.440 --> 0:12:23.720
<v Speaker 1>you're because your state's not going to do it. There's

0:12:23.760 --> 0:12:26.880
<v Speaker 1>a variety of reasons for that. There's just I think

0:12:26.880 --> 0:12:29.640
<v Speaker 1>the legislature's too split. There's even if you wanted to,

0:12:29.679 --> 0:12:34.199
<v Speaker 1>you couldn't. I know that a lot of your colleagues

0:12:34.480 --> 0:12:38.720
<v Speaker 1>in Congress don't like what's happening, including Texas Republicans in

0:12:38.760 --> 0:12:42.920
<v Speaker 1>California Democrats, but that they feel like pawns in a

0:12:43.000 --> 0:12:46.880
<v Speaker 1>larger fight, because guess what your pawns in a larger fight.

0:12:46.920 --> 0:12:47.160
<v Speaker 3>You know.

0:12:49.960 --> 0:12:52.200
<v Speaker 1>But I look at how the Democrats are fighting this,

0:12:52.679 --> 0:12:56.760
<v Speaker 1>and simultaneously you've got Pete Bootagees going to Indiana saying

0:12:56.760 --> 0:13:00.439
<v Speaker 1>please don't do this. And then you've got Democrats raising

0:13:00.520 --> 0:13:04.800
<v Speaker 1>money so that Gavin Newsom can win a proposition which,

0:13:05.000 --> 0:13:08.439
<v Speaker 1>like I, at least you get the voters get You're

0:13:08.480 --> 0:13:10.640
<v Speaker 1>including the voters in the say so here because they

0:13:10.679 --> 0:13:14.120
<v Speaker 1>have to. But that feels like such a mixed message

0:13:14.160 --> 0:13:18.880
<v Speaker 1>that I you know, it is really hard to get

0:13:18.920 --> 0:13:23.600
<v Speaker 1>my arms around if you're upset about disenfranchising voters in Texas.

0:13:24.040 --> 0:13:27.800
<v Speaker 1>How is the answered disenfranchising voters in other states. Yeah,

0:13:28.120 --> 0:13:30.679
<v Speaker 1>let's start with here's what I would like to see,

0:13:31.000 --> 0:13:34.480
<v Speaker 1>which we just have a federal ban on partisan jerrymandering

0:13:34.480 --> 0:13:36.720
<v Speaker 1>and we have federal standard for fair maps.

0:13:36.760 --> 0:13:38.480
<v Speaker 3>That was in what was.

0:13:38.559 --> 0:13:40.559
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, for the People Act or HR one,

0:13:40.600 --> 0:13:42.400
<v Speaker 2>but before I got to the Congress.

0:13:42.280 --> 0:13:43.480
<v Speaker 1>Some of that was in there, and there was also

0:13:43.520 --> 0:13:45.719
<v Speaker 1>a lot of partisan stuff which made it less of

0:13:45.760 --> 0:13:49.920
<v Speaker 1>a serious bill unfortunately. I mean, look, I'm for somebody

0:13:49.920 --> 0:13:51.840
<v Speaker 1>that says, you have messaging bills, and you have bills

0:13:51.840 --> 0:13:52.680
<v Speaker 1>you want to get passed.

0:13:52.880 --> 0:13:54.760
<v Speaker 3>That was a bill for messaging, not necessarily.

0:13:55.200 --> 0:13:58.160
<v Speaker 2>Let's do a federal anti jerryman ring thing. Just take

0:13:58.160 --> 0:14:01.960
<v Speaker 2>this off right, it's out of the playbook for either party.

0:14:02.200 --> 0:14:05.600
<v Speaker 2>While it's not the standard until that happens, I'm not

0:14:05.640 --> 0:14:08.480
<v Speaker 2>interested in Democrats fighting with like a wet spaghetti noodle

0:14:08.480 --> 0:14:11.400
<v Speaker 2>while the Republicans are carrying to Maszooka like this is

0:14:11.480 --> 0:14:14.679
<v Speaker 2>control of Congress and how they write a map and

0:14:14.720 --> 0:14:20.200
<v Speaker 2>say Indiana and Texas affects what happens to my constituents.

0:14:20.200 --> 0:14:22.600
<v Speaker 2>The same reason why I've been endorsing some folks in

0:14:22.640 --> 0:14:25.880
<v Speaker 2>competitive districts in Pennsylvania, because those members of Congress are

0:14:25.880 --> 0:14:29.200
<v Speaker 2>taking votes that are my constituents. So I don't want

0:14:29.600 --> 0:14:34.400
<v Speaker 2>Democrats to be fighting limply while Republicans are taking seats

0:14:34.480 --> 0:14:36.800
<v Speaker 2>all over the country. And I would start and end

0:14:36.840 --> 0:14:39.680
<v Speaker 2>with let's just get rid of this as a tool

0:14:39.720 --> 0:14:41.840
<v Speaker 2>for either party and just have a federal standard.

0:14:41.880 --> 0:14:43.800
<v Speaker 3>I think that's where this has to go.

0:14:44.680 --> 0:14:46.960
<v Speaker 2>And I think, look, ruck I also think this goes

0:14:47.000 --> 0:14:49.480
<v Speaker 2>to that distrust and government problem when politicians are right

0:14:49.480 --> 0:14:52.000
<v Speaker 2>in their own maps, when they're picking their districts, when

0:14:52.000 --> 0:14:54.720
<v Speaker 2>they're carvering little communities and all the matters is a

0:14:54.760 --> 0:14:58.360
<v Speaker 2>competitive primary, I don't think you get great representation.

0:14:57.960 --> 0:15:02.040
<v Speaker 1>But you understand that, look and understand the issue of

0:15:02.040 --> 0:15:05.320
<v Speaker 1>of when when you sort of compromise your principle for

0:15:06.680 --> 0:15:11.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, and again like I get it right, I

0:15:11.360 --> 0:15:17.120
<v Speaker 1>understand the rationale and I get all of that. It

0:15:17.320 --> 0:15:19.680
<v Speaker 1>just doesn't feel like a long term way to win

0:15:19.960 --> 0:15:25.040
<v Speaker 1>trust back. That's and that's what makes it so such

0:15:25.080 --> 0:15:29.280
<v Speaker 1>a flawed way to fight back because I also think

0:15:30.640 --> 0:15:35.320
<v Speaker 1>I think that what Texas did is not as is

0:15:35.320 --> 0:15:37.160
<v Speaker 1>not going to be as effective as they think it is. Right,

0:15:37.240 --> 0:15:41.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, the unintended consequences always bite you on this stuff.

0:15:42.040 --> 0:15:45.400
<v Speaker 1>And that's that's why I'm thinking the fight quote unquote,

0:15:45.440 --> 0:15:48.120
<v Speaker 1>fighting fighting fire with fire is like, you know, be

0:15:48.200 --> 0:15:48.920
<v Speaker 1>careful out there.

0:15:49.840 --> 0:15:51.640
<v Speaker 3>You don't you don't know what you've opened up.

0:15:52.160 --> 0:15:54.800
<v Speaker 2>No, and look, when you draw these things with aggressive

0:15:54.840 --> 0:15:56.800
<v Speaker 2>Jerry managers, I think you're alluding to this fact. You

0:15:56.840 --> 0:16:00.200
<v Speaker 2>make some of those seats potentially gettable, especially if it's

0:16:00.200 --> 0:16:03.400
<v Speaker 2>a big way of election the other direction, right, And

0:16:03.440 --> 0:16:06.040
<v Speaker 2>so that's a part of this. That's a risk they're

0:16:06.040 --> 0:16:08.480
<v Speaker 2>gonna have to take on because I hope and expect

0:16:08.560 --> 0:16:10.320
<v Speaker 2>we might have a good year next year.

0:16:10.120 --> 0:16:12.080
<v Speaker 3>And that could go very different webs.

0:16:12.200 --> 0:16:17.960
<v Speaker 1>So, speaking of ways to do confrontation with Trump, there's

0:16:19.520 --> 0:16:23.720
<v Speaker 1>we consider in debates shutdown, no shutdown. I sort of understand, Hey,

0:16:23.720 --> 0:16:26.840
<v Speaker 1>when you've got leverage, use it right. That's that's sort

0:16:26.880 --> 0:16:29.120
<v Speaker 1>of part of the process. That's what politics is about.

0:16:30.280 --> 0:16:32.280
<v Speaker 3>It does feel like the timing now is when do

0:16:32.320 --> 0:16:35.239
<v Speaker 3>you use it right? Is this is this six.

0:16:35.000 --> 0:16:37.640
<v Speaker 1>Week cr the hill to die on? Or do you

0:16:37.720 --> 0:16:40.240
<v Speaker 1>let this one go and you fight the fight in November?

0:16:40.440 --> 0:16:41.480
<v Speaker 1>Where's your mindset on this?

0:16:42.040 --> 0:16:42.240
<v Speaker 3>Well?

0:16:42.320 --> 0:16:44.960
<v Speaker 2>Number one, nobody wants a shutdown let's just start with that.

0:16:45.440 --> 0:16:48.440
<v Speaker 2>And you know, much like the last funding fight, my

0:16:48.920 --> 0:16:51.400
<v Speaker 2>counterparts in the Senate have much more leverage than we

0:16:51.480 --> 0:16:53.400
<v Speaker 2>do in the House, and they should use it, and

0:16:53.480 --> 0:16:55.400
<v Speaker 2>they use it to protect American people as use it

0:16:55.400 --> 0:16:57.640
<v Speaker 2>for good. They use it's a fund the government responsibly.

0:16:58.160 --> 0:17:01.040
<v Speaker 2>They have a filibuster. We don't have that House. And

0:17:01.320 --> 0:17:04.320
<v Speaker 2>I've long felt like the Republicans have full control of

0:17:04.359 --> 0:17:08.879
<v Speaker 2>our government, you know, this House, Senate, White House. If

0:17:08.920 --> 0:17:11.840
<v Speaker 2>they want our votes, they should do something to work

0:17:11.840 --> 0:17:12.159
<v Speaker 2>with us.

0:17:12.160 --> 0:17:15.360
<v Speaker 3>But I don't have to go along with saying yes

0:17:15.480 --> 0:17:16.840
<v Speaker 3>to rescinding funding.

0:17:16.880 --> 0:17:18.760
<v Speaker 2>I don't just stick go along with saying yes to

0:17:18.920 --> 0:17:22.160
<v Speaker 2>using the bully pulper the White House to suppress speech

0:17:22.240 --> 0:17:25.240
<v Speaker 2>and to shut down critical voices.

0:17:24.840 --> 0:17:26.760
<v Speaker 3>In the media. I don't do any of those things.

0:17:27.200 --> 0:17:29.040
<v Speaker 2>And so I think there's a path here. They can

0:17:29.080 --> 0:17:32.760
<v Speaker 2>decide to work with Democrats responsibly, or they can do

0:17:32.760 --> 0:17:34.280
<v Speaker 2>it on their own, because they have enough power to

0:17:34.280 --> 0:17:36.439
<v Speaker 2>do it. And if they shut the government down, it

0:17:36.440 --> 0:17:38.000
<v Speaker 2>falls on them. It's not going to fall on the

0:17:38.040 --> 0:17:41.280
<v Speaker 2>House minority Democrats who aren't saying yes with a crazy

0:17:41.280 --> 0:17:41.840
<v Speaker 2>spending plan.

0:17:42.960 --> 0:17:45.480
<v Speaker 1>No, I get that. I mean, I just guess just tactically.

0:17:45.880 --> 0:17:47.760
<v Speaker 1>And again, I know I'm a little weeds this year,

0:17:47.760 --> 0:17:50.920
<v Speaker 1>but it's like I might let the six weeks see

0:17:51.040 --> 0:17:54.320
<v Speaker 1>r happen clean, Hey, you want six more weeks to talk, Fine,

0:17:54.320 --> 0:17:56.640
<v Speaker 1>we'll give you six more weeks to negotiate, but you're

0:17:56.640 --> 0:17:57.920
<v Speaker 1>not getting another extension.

0:17:58.280 --> 0:17:58.879
<v Speaker 3>Like you know it.

0:17:59.800 --> 0:18:03.600
<v Speaker 1>I go there because I see the shoes literally been

0:18:03.640 --> 0:18:05.440
<v Speaker 1>on the other foot on that. Hey we need six

0:18:05.440 --> 0:18:08.320
<v Speaker 1>more weeks to negotiate. Can we buy that while we

0:18:08.359 --> 0:18:10.639
<v Speaker 1>get through this. It's one of those where you're like,

0:18:11.440 --> 0:18:13.560
<v Speaker 1>you know it's That's what I mean is do you die?

0:18:13.800 --> 0:18:16.960
<v Speaker 1>You know you got to pick. I get the battle's

0:18:17.000 --> 0:18:18.720
<v Speaker 1>going to happen. The question is when do you want

0:18:18.760 --> 0:18:19.520
<v Speaker 1>the battle to happen.

0:18:19.840 --> 0:18:22.679
<v Speaker 2>Well, look, if there's any real effort to work with

0:18:22.760 --> 0:18:25.320
<v Speaker 2>us to have some kind of negotiation, great, let's do that.

0:18:26.000 --> 0:18:28.560
<v Speaker 2>I haven't seen any of that, And so I think

0:18:28.680 --> 0:18:30.640
<v Speaker 2>to your point, if it's about buying time to work

0:18:30.640 --> 0:18:33.840
<v Speaker 2>something out, responsible, okay, I think you actually have support

0:18:33.920 --> 0:18:35.880
<v Speaker 2>for it. I haven't seen any of that yet. I mean,

0:18:35.880 --> 0:18:39.000
<v Speaker 2>maybe what I heard today is there some interest from

0:18:39.000 --> 0:18:41.240
<v Speaker 2>the White House, a meeting with Leader Jeffreys and Schumer.

0:18:41.760 --> 0:18:44.720
<v Speaker 2>You know, it's we're now a week out from the

0:18:44.880 --> 0:18:45.920
<v Speaker 2>end of the fiscal year.

0:18:48.040 --> 0:18:52.320
<v Speaker 1>One of the Democratic senator from Pennsylvania has already indicated

0:18:52.359 --> 0:18:55.600
<v Speaker 1>he's going to vote to keep the government open pretty

0:18:55.680 --> 0:18:56.359
<v Speaker 1>much no matter what.

0:18:56.840 --> 0:19:01.280
<v Speaker 3>And you know betterman, it's been interesting viewed him for my.

0:19:02.840 --> 0:19:05.560
<v Speaker 1>About I guess it's been about five or six months now,

0:19:06.359 --> 0:19:09.960
<v Speaker 1>and his mindset was, Look, we've got one north starts

0:19:10.040 --> 0:19:12.199
<v Speaker 1>the seven swing states. Whatever it takes to get a

0:19:12.240 --> 0:19:14.080
<v Speaker 1>majority of the seventh swing state ought to be the

0:19:14.119 --> 0:19:16.960
<v Speaker 1>focus of the party. See, I get that. That's an

0:19:16.960 --> 0:19:19.520
<v Speaker 1>interesting north star. That's what you'd want the head of

0:19:19.720 --> 0:19:25.840
<v Speaker 1>the party to say. He's been in uh shifted on that.

0:19:26.520 --> 0:19:29.400
<v Speaker 1>What do you make of it? And do you where

0:19:29.440 --> 0:19:33.240
<v Speaker 1>are you with his He doesn't want to shut down

0:19:33.240 --> 0:19:34.160
<v Speaker 1>the government mindset?

0:19:34.440 --> 0:19:36.800
<v Speaker 2>Yep, me neither, And yet I wouldn't vote for a

0:19:36.840 --> 0:19:40.480
<v Speaker 2>shutdown bill that repealed the Civil Rights Act or you know,

0:19:40.640 --> 0:19:43.600
<v Speaker 2>made national right to work or some national abortion band like.

0:19:43.600 --> 0:19:44.119
<v Speaker 3>Of course not.

0:19:44.520 --> 0:19:47.800
<v Speaker 2>We can do a basic level of analysis and have

0:19:47.880 --> 0:19:51.760
<v Speaker 2>some basic values that we're not going to compromise, and

0:19:51.800 --> 0:19:54.440
<v Speaker 2>so I don't think it's that complicated. We can say

0:19:54.640 --> 0:19:57.080
<v Speaker 2>and support funding the government and also say on there

0:19:57.080 --> 0:19:58.399
<v Speaker 2>are lines I'm not going to cross.

0:19:59.320 --> 0:20:01.639
<v Speaker 3>May we balance those and put those in different places.

0:20:01.680 --> 0:20:03.680
<v Speaker 2>I guess we do, But I don't really get the

0:20:03.800 --> 0:20:07.120
<v Speaker 2>argument that there is no circumstances ever where I wouldn't

0:20:07.240 --> 0:20:12.119
<v Speaker 2>vote against a very partisan bad spending bill from the Republicans.

0:20:17.040 --> 0:20:20.119
<v Speaker 1>There's a reason results matter more than promises, just like

0:20:20.200 --> 0:20:23.280
<v Speaker 1>there's a reason. Morgan and Morgan is America's largest injury

0:20:23.359 --> 0:20:26.120
<v Speaker 1>law firm. For the last thirty five years, they've recovered

0:20:26.240 --> 0:20:29.360
<v Speaker 1>twenty five billion dollars for more than half a million clients.

0:20:29.920 --> 0:20:33.520
<v Speaker 1>It includes cases where insurance companies offered next to nothing,

0:20:33.800 --> 0:20:36.600
<v Speaker 1>just hoping to get away with paying as little as possible.

0:20:36.680 --> 0:20:39.760
<v Speaker 1>Morgan and Morgan fought back ended up winning millions. In fact,

0:20:39.840 --> 0:20:42.919
<v Speaker 1>in Pennsylvania, one client was awarded twenty six million dollars,

0:20:43.400 --> 0:20:46.479
<v Speaker 1>which was a staggering forty times the amount that the

0:20:46.480 --> 0:20:49.800
<v Speaker 1>insurance company originally offered. That original offer six hundred and

0:20:49.800 --> 0:20:52.800
<v Speaker 1>fifty thousand dollars twenty six million, six hundred and fifty

0:20:52.840 --> 0:20:55.040
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollars. So with more than one thousand lawyers across

0:20:55.040 --> 0:20:57.520
<v Speaker 1>the country, they know how to deliver for everyday people.

0:20:57.600 --> 0:21:00.320
<v Speaker 1>If you're injured, you need a lawyer. You need somebody

0:21:00.359 --> 0:21:02.880
<v Speaker 1>to get your back, check out for the People dot com,

0:21:02.880 --> 0:21:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Slash podcast or now Pound Law, Pound five two nine

0:21:08.280 --> 0:21:11.760
<v Speaker 1>law on your cell phone. And remember all law firms

0:21:11.800 --> 0:21:13.639
<v Speaker 1>are not the same, So check out Morgan and Morgan.

0:21:13.720 --> 0:21:21.280
<v Speaker 1>Their fee is free unless they win. You were on

0:21:21.320 --> 0:21:24.679
<v Speaker 1>the ballot with Betterman in twenty two. Did you believe

0:21:24.680 --> 0:21:26.120
<v Speaker 1>he was to your left or to your right?

0:21:26.880 --> 0:21:27.880
<v Speaker 3>You know it's funny. I don't.

0:21:28.160 --> 0:21:34.280
<v Speaker 2>I don't really think about him or maybe even Joshapiro

0:21:34.400 --> 0:21:37.440
<v Speaker 2>right like our Pennsylvania Democrats in that way, I don't

0:21:37.440 --> 0:21:41.440
<v Speaker 2>think we're so obviously in a certain orientation in the party,

0:21:41.480 --> 0:21:44.879
<v Speaker 2>and certainly now things are different. But like I think

0:21:45.200 --> 0:21:48.960
<v Speaker 2>there has been a scrambling of the old centrist, progressive,

0:21:49.200 --> 0:21:52.359
<v Speaker 2>whatever lanes of the Democratic Party. I think there is

0:21:52.400 --> 0:21:56.439
<v Speaker 2>a very different orientation now about your willingness to be

0:21:56.480 --> 0:21:56.919
<v Speaker 2>a fighter.

0:21:56.960 --> 0:21:59.360
<v Speaker 3>I don't just mean about Trump. I mean on this.

0:21:59.400 --> 0:22:03.640
<v Speaker 2>Economic against say it's monopoly power against corruption. I think

0:22:03.680 --> 0:22:07.720
<v Speaker 2>it's we're reorienting in that way. I like it because

0:22:07.720 --> 0:22:10.720
<v Speaker 2>I see colleagues of mine who might wear different.

0:22:10.440 --> 0:22:12.600
<v Speaker 3>Labels, who are all in with me.

0:22:12.640 --> 0:22:16.400
<v Speaker 2>On a fight against say, corrupt congressional stock trading or

0:22:16.840 --> 0:22:18.240
<v Speaker 2>who are with me about.

0:22:17.960 --> 0:22:19.199
<v Speaker 3>Fighting against monopolies?

0:22:19.200 --> 0:22:22.440
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I did this monopoly Buster's Caucus with colleagues

0:22:22.520 --> 0:22:26.359
<v Speaker 2>like Pat Ryan Promilagaia, Paul Maggie Goodlander. Right, it's an

0:22:26.440 --> 0:22:32.320
<v Speaker 2>interesting re scrambling of those old labels, you know, different ways.

0:22:32.480 --> 0:22:35.200
<v Speaker 1>Interesting Like you know, during the twenty twenty two primary,

0:22:35.240 --> 0:22:38.000
<v Speaker 1>Connor Lamb was the supposed centrist in John Fetterman was

0:22:38.040 --> 0:22:41.359
<v Speaker 1>the supposed progressive right. Is that is that how that

0:22:41.400 --> 0:22:43.320
<v Speaker 1>primary would look today?

0:22:43.480 --> 0:22:47.000
<v Speaker 3>It's a great question. I don't know, you know, and

0:22:46.320 --> 0:22:47.480
<v Speaker 3>I think I think either.

0:22:48.200 --> 0:22:50.480
<v Speaker 2>And much of our conversation up to this point has

0:22:50.480 --> 0:22:54.000
<v Speaker 2>been about the style of what a Democrat in Washington

0:22:54.119 --> 0:22:57.359
<v Speaker 2>is in the opposition in the minority, and so it's

0:22:57.400 --> 0:22:59.880
<v Speaker 2>a very different posture of going back to twenty two.

0:22:59.880 --> 0:23:03.399
<v Speaker 2>I first ran Democrats on the White House, and we're

0:23:03.440 --> 0:23:07.159
<v Speaker 2>still riding in the House with some control, and so

0:23:07.200 --> 0:23:08.800
<v Speaker 2>it's a very different posture.

0:23:08.880 --> 0:23:09.480
<v Speaker 3>And again I.

0:23:09.400 --> 0:23:13.679
<v Speaker 2>Don't think the current if there are phisures, it's not

0:23:13.800 --> 0:23:16.840
<v Speaker 2>so much about progressive lane, centrist.

0:23:16.480 --> 0:23:19.080
<v Speaker 3>Lane, moderate, whatever. I think it's now much more.

0:23:18.960 --> 0:23:22.640
<v Speaker 2>About what weather you're fighting and on what grounds you're

0:23:22.640 --> 0:23:25.080
<v Speaker 2>fighting more than it is are you going to support this,

0:23:25.200 --> 0:23:27.560
<v Speaker 2>that or the other piece of legislation, and what kind

0:23:27.560 --> 0:23:29.200
<v Speaker 2>of label democrats.

0:23:28.720 --> 0:23:29.600
<v Speaker 3>That make you.

0:23:29.640 --> 0:23:32.239
<v Speaker 1>No, it's an interesting thesis. I don't disagree with it

0:23:32.280 --> 0:23:34.359
<v Speaker 1>that there is sort of a little bit more. This

0:23:34.480 --> 0:23:37.680
<v Speaker 1>is no longer about size of government issues and government

0:23:37.720 --> 0:23:41.960
<v Speaker 1>spending issues that it really is more of how should

0:23:42.000 --> 0:23:43.679
<v Speaker 1>the power of government be used?

0:23:44.800 --> 0:23:48.880
<v Speaker 2>Well, yeah, I agree, and I think, look, you have

0:23:49.000 --> 0:23:52.640
<v Speaker 2>Donald Trump trying to take what has become a very

0:23:52.680 --> 0:23:56.040
<v Speaker 2>powerful imperial presidency and put it on steroids, and a

0:23:56.160 --> 0:23:58.320
<v Speaker 2>question of what the heck do you do to stop

0:23:58.320 --> 0:24:02.160
<v Speaker 2>that and to protect the constitution, to assert the Congress's rule,

0:24:02.720 --> 0:24:05.960
<v Speaker 2>to assert the Court's rule. I don't think that lends

0:24:06.000 --> 0:24:12.320
<v Speaker 2>itself to a progressive, liberal, moderate centrist, whatever kind of lens.

0:24:12.400 --> 0:24:14.760
<v Speaker 2>It's a question of how do you be effective in

0:24:15.400 --> 0:24:17.000
<v Speaker 2>shoring up our constitution.

0:24:17.200 --> 0:24:19.040
<v Speaker 1>I had a friend of mine who might have called

0:24:19.119 --> 0:24:22.640
<v Speaker 1>himself a progressive, say three or four years ago, who said,

0:24:22.720 --> 0:24:26.760
<v Speaker 1>I want my own Donald Trump. And I said, what

0:24:26.800 --> 0:24:30.080
<v Speaker 1>do you mean? I want somebody in there with strength, right,

0:24:30.119 --> 0:24:34.439
<v Speaker 1>getting it to this strong versus weak argument, who's willing

0:24:34.560 --> 0:24:40.080
<v Speaker 1>to use, to accumulate and use power? And I get it,

0:24:40.760 --> 0:24:43.240
<v Speaker 1>But there's this fine line. Right, there's no doubt Donald

0:24:43.240 --> 0:24:45.560
<v Speaker 1>Trump does not believe in small government. He believes in

0:24:45.640 --> 0:24:49.760
<v Speaker 1>strong government. Strong government through his lens.

0:24:50.400 --> 0:24:52.639
<v Speaker 3>It tells me we are likely to have.

0:24:52.800 --> 0:24:56.000
<v Speaker 1>A political I'm a believer in political physics an equal

0:24:56.119 --> 0:25:00.680
<v Speaker 1>and opposite reaction, so we're probably going to have from

0:25:00.720 --> 0:25:04.760
<v Speaker 1>the other side of the ideological spectrum, also pursue a

0:25:04.800 --> 0:25:10.639
<v Speaker 1>more robust use of government. Can you do it without

0:25:10.640 --> 0:25:14.360
<v Speaker 1>it coming across as borderline authoritarian?

0:25:15.240 --> 0:25:19.159
<v Speaker 2>Well, Number one, I sure hope that's the case. And look,

0:25:19.240 --> 0:25:24.359
<v Speaker 2>I think there will be different political party in power

0:25:24.359 --> 0:25:27.000
<v Speaker 2>in Washington. There will be a democratic provitable right, will

0:25:27.040 --> 0:25:31.160
<v Speaker 2>be a democratic conference. And I think whomever that president

0:25:31.280 --> 0:25:35.120
<v Speaker 2>is should use their power to shore up the government,

0:25:35.160 --> 0:25:37.399
<v Speaker 2>to shore up trust and government. I talked about the

0:25:37.440 --> 0:25:42.280
<v Speaker 2>economic fight, why that undercuts trust. They also should be

0:25:42.359 --> 0:25:46.440
<v Speaker 2>clear about where there's been overstepping and overreach, where this

0:25:46.520 --> 0:25:49.719
<v Speaker 2>president or any other has been able to expose the

0:25:49.720 --> 0:25:52.320
<v Speaker 2>weak spots in our system to just relying on norms

0:25:52.400 --> 0:25:53.960
<v Speaker 2>or just relying on behavior.

0:25:54.520 --> 0:25:57.280
<v Speaker 1>Orcement agencies like I look at the FBI and the

0:25:57.320 --> 0:26:01.760
<v Speaker 1>Department of Justice right now, and they couldn't be totally untrustworthy.

0:26:05.200 --> 0:26:06.800
<v Speaker 1>But I'm not going to sit here and say you

0:26:06.840 --> 0:26:11.080
<v Speaker 1>automatically restore trust by simply electing the other party. How

0:26:11.080 --> 0:26:15.639
<v Speaker 1>do you build in a safeguard so that the next

0:26:15.680 --> 0:26:19.040
<v Speaker 1>Trump is 'enable to weaponize the Justice Department?

0:26:19.320 --> 0:26:21.040
<v Speaker 3>Right? What do you do?

0:26:20.480 --> 0:26:23.359
<v Speaker 1>Do we change the status like there's a you know,

0:26:23.960 --> 0:26:26.560
<v Speaker 1>does the Justice Department get treated more like the Federal Reserve?

0:26:26.560 --> 0:26:28.359
<v Speaker 1>Although we're about to find out whether the Federal Reserve

0:26:28.400 --> 0:26:32.040
<v Speaker 1>has any independence left. But in theory, right, the Federal

0:26:32.040 --> 0:26:36.600
<v Speaker 1>Reserve a little bit different as far as it's supposedly

0:26:36.640 --> 0:26:38.880
<v Speaker 1>the Supreme Court has claimed it will be treating it differently,

0:26:39.160 --> 0:26:41.480
<v Speaker 1>more independent than as part of the executive branch.

0:26:42.200 --> 0:26:43.960
<v Speaker 3>Is that the model of our love that we ought

0:26:43.960 --> 0:26:44.200
<v Speaker 3>to be.

0:26:44.200 --> 0:26:47.680
<v Speaker 1>Taking with law enforcement, considering once you lose trust in that,

0:26:47.720 --> 0:26:49.040
<v Speaker 1>you've lost the democracy.

0:26:49.160 --> 0:26:54.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and frankly, not just I think you identify and

0:26:54.320 --> 0:26:57.160
<v Speaker 2>diagnose a real problem, but it also is about well,

0:26:57.200 --> 0:27:00.440
<v Speaker 2>the person who sits atop that law enforcement system, are

0:27:00.440 --> 0:27:03.480
<v Speaker 2>they willing to call for prosecution of their enemies to

0:27:03.640 --> 0:27:06.840
<v Speaker 2>rip up those norms? And so we can't. My point

0:27:06.920 --> 0:27:09.639
<v Speaker 2>is we can't be at the whim of what's in

0:27:09.680 --> 0:27:11.679
<v Speaker 2>the heart of mever happens to be the President, and

0:27:11.720 --> 0:27:13.640
<v Speaker 2>that to me is about structural change.

0:27:14.000 --> 0:27:15.240
<v Speaker 3>We got to have reform so.

0:27:15.200 --> 0:27:17.439
<v Speaker 2>That whether you've got a good or bad guy or

0:27:17.440 --> 0:27:21.160
<v Speaker 2>gal at the White House, it doesn't matter. They don't

0:27:21.160 --> 0:27:24.360
<v Speaker 2>have the tools to abuse something as base.

0:27:24.160 --> 0:27:27.080
<v Speaker 3>Against Look at their Look at this story that's circulated

0:27:27.080 --> 0:27:30.000
<v Speaker 3>over the weekend about Tom Holman and cash right, this

0:27:30.119 --> 0:27:34.919
<v Speaker 3>was an investigation taking place during Christopher Ray's FBI and

0:27:35.000 --> 0:27:37.440
<v Speaker 3>now it's Cash Betel's FBI, and they just shut it down.

0:27:38.920 --> 0:27:41.640
<v Speaker 3>They don't. By the way, what's amazing about this story

0:27:41.880 --> 0:27:44.680
<v Speaker 3>is they don't deny it happened. It is.

0:27:45.960 --> 0:27:49.400
<v Speaker 1>There's no denial of the facts of the story. There's

0:27:49.520 --> 0:27:52.520
<v Speaker 1>just simply well, we're not going to prosecute. There's nothing

0:27:52.560 --> 0:27:55.920
<v Speaker 1>to prosecute. And by the way, in fairness, bribery cases

0:27:55.960 --> 0:27:58.520
<v Speaker 1>are a high bar. They you know, if you can't

0:27:58.560 --> 0:28:00.399
<v Speaker 1>find the quit the you know, the quo in the

0:28:00.480 --> 0:28:04.080
<v Speaker 1>quid pro quo, it is always it is certainly difficult.

0:28:05.680 --> 0:28:07.560
<v Speaker 1>I assume the irs will have a little something to

0:28:07.560 --> 0:28:12.960
<v Speaker 1>say about mister Homan's extra income from the COVID takeout.

0:28:13.000 --> 0:28:15.639
<v Speaker 1>But when you look at a story like that and

0:28:15.720 --> 0:28:19.600
<v Speaker 1>you realize Christopher Ray managed the FBI one way in

0:28:19.680 --> 0:28:23.840
<v Speaker 1>cash Pttel who put out a statement, a joint statement

0:28:23.880 --> 0:28:27.400
<v Speaker 1>with the president's former personal attorney who somehow got confirmed

0:28:27.400 --> 0:28:31.640
<v Speaker 1>to be a deputy Attorney General. I mean, it's it's

0:28:31.760 --> 0:28:33.480
<v Speaker 1>laughable if it wasn't so serious.

0:28:33.960 --> 0:28:34.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:28:34.760 --> 0:28:37.480
<v Speaker 2>Well, and to me, again, I think it's a symptom

0:28:37.560 --> 0:28:41.280
<v Speaker 2>of we now have a person who is willing to

0:28:41.320 --> 0:28:43.320
<v Speaker 2>look around and say, wow, I have all this power,

0:28:43.320 --> 0:28:46.240
<v Speaker 2>I can abuse it, and there aren't formal guardrails in

0:28:46.280 --> 0:28:48.760
<v Speaker 2>place to stop it. So to me, that just goes

0:28:48.800 --> 0:28:52.280
<v Speaker 2>to we have to have better structure, better form. There's

0:28:52.320 --> 0:28:55.360
<v Speaker 2>not some single silver bullet I can explain to you

0:28:55.440 --> 0:28:57.680
<v Speaker 2>on this podcast to how we do that. But to me,

0:28:58.600 --> 0:29:01.080
<v Speaker 2>we can't just hope there's a better, different person. You

0:29:01.240 --> 0:29:04.160
<v Speaker 2>got to put real limits on their power in place,

0:29:04.360 --> 0:29:06.440
<v Speaker 2>no matter which party has the White House in the future.

0:29:06.800 --> 0:29:09.760
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about an entity that you have some familiarity with,

0:29:09.880 --> 0:29:12.240
<v Speaker 1>being somebody who's served in the Navy.

0:29:13.640 --> 0:29:15.680
<v Speaker 3>It feels like there's an attempt.

0:29:15.320 --> 0:29:17.720
<v Speaker 1>To politicize the military right now in ways that we've

0:29:17.920 --> 0:29:21.760
<v Speaker 1>never seen go into it. I mean, I think about

0:29:21.800 --> 0:29:24.080
<v Speaker 1>I've already heard you know, I think there are parts

0:29:24.080 --> 0:29:28.040
<v Speaker 1>of this that don't get enough reporting including what's happening

0:29:28.040 --> 0:29:31.120
<v Speaker 1>at war colleges, what's happening to academy at the Naval

0:29:31.160 --> 0:29:32.480
<v Speaker 1>Academy at West Point.

0:29:32.800 --> 0:29:35.200
<v Speaker 3>But tell me what you understand is happening.

0:29:36.000 --> 0:29:39.040
<v Speaker 2>There is a real attempt here, and I think one

0:29:39.080 --> 0:29:41.520
<v Speaker 2>of the opening salvos of that you mentioned the Naval

0:29:41.520 --> 0:29:43.880
<v Speaker 2>Academy where I'm a graduate. I'm on the board there now,

0:29:44.480 --> 0:29:46.240
<v Speaker 2>and there was an attempt.

0:29:46.840 --> 0:29:49.080
<v Speaker 3>Still on the board, they don't take you out.

0:29:49.360 --> 0:29:51.920
<v Speaker 2>There's a congressional slate and there are a presidential appointees.

0:29:51.960 --> 0:29:54.840
<v Speaker 2>So there are Democrats from the congressional slate on the.

0:29:54.800 --> 0:29:58.960
<v Speaker 1>Band that Trump couldn't just eat Theron and Seth can't

0:29:58.960 --> 0:30:01.320
<v Speaker 1>remove you either, correct, And.

0:30:01.320 --> 0:30:02.880
<v Speaker 2>So there was an attempt to take books out of

0:30:02.880 --> 0:30:06.600
<v Speaker 2>the library. You know, this is a look, it's a

0:30:06.880 --> 0:30:10.080
<v Speaker 2>proving ground and a training place for future Navy Marine

0:30:10.120 --> 0:30:13.560
<v Speaker 2>Corps officers. It's also an academic institution. There are faculty

0:30:13.560 --> 0:30:16.560
<v Speaker 2>who do research, and so that's just one little piece

0:30:16.600 --> 0:30:19.360
<v Speaker 2>of a bigger problem. I saw the President at the

0:30:19.360 --> 0:30:23.520
<v Speaker 2>West Point Commissioning wearing a Maga hat. He was in

0:30:23.520 --> 0:30:26.640
<v Speaker 2>front of the troops down in North Carolina. There was

0:30:26.760 --> 0:30:31.160
<v Speaker 2>merch being sold. Design understand a campaign merch talking about

0:30:31.160 --> 0:30:33.720
<v Speaker 2>his political rivals in front of the troops, just stuff

0:30:33.720 --> 0:30:37.360
<v Speaker 2>that would seem beyond the pale. And yet it's happening

0:30:38.040 --> 0:30:41.480
<v Speaker 2>all against the backdrop of these efforts to I think,

0:30:41.520 --> 0:30:45.280
<v Speaker 2>politicize the curriculum at West Point Annapolis Air Force Academy,

0:30:46.680 --> 0:30:51.320
<v Speaker 2>to make changes to the senior flag and general officers

0:30:51.800 --> 0:30:55.000
<v Speaker 2>seemingly around their political views. And that's just a part

0:30:55.000 --> 0:30:56.280
<v Speaker 2>of it. And so I think it's a problem. I

0:30:56.280 --> 0:30:58.480
<v Speaker 2>think it's a big problem. And I come from again,

0:30:58.920 --> 0:31:01.280
<v Speaker 2>I was an officer immission on the Naval Academy. The

0:31:01.320 --> 0:31:06.000
<v Speaker 2>culture we learned was a political You don't ever give

0:31:06.040 --> 0:31:08.920
<v Speaker 2>any appearance of that kind of bias and uniform because

0:31:08.960 --> 0:31:12.400
<v Speaker 2>you serve the civilian leadership, whichever party that might be,

0:31:12.720 --> 0:31:15.240
<v Speaker 2>right the secretary up to the president. And I think

0:31:15.280 --> 0:31:21.280
<v Speaker 2>this effort to inject political and partisan loyalty, it's dangerous

0:31:21.320 --> 0:31:25.640
<v Speaker 2>to me, just again goes to eroding trust in the

0:31:25.640 --> 0:31:27.520
<v Speaker 2>military as an institution that's going.

0:31:27.360 --> 0:31:29.680
<v Speaker 3>To serve the civilian leadership who we elect.

0:31:29.440 --> 0:31:32.200
<v Speaker 2>In this country.

0:31:33.000 --> 0:31:33.880
<v Speaker 3>It's interesting to me.

0:31:34.160 --> 0:31:36.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't think the timing of this attempt by the

0:31:36.800 --> 0:31:40.000
<v Speaker 1>Pentagon to stifle press coverage.

0:31:41.440 --> 0:31:43.400
<v Speaker 3>It literally came two days after.

0:31:43.320 --> 0:31:45.920
<v Speaker 1>The Wall Street Journal reported that there were lawyers at

0:31:45.960 --> 0:31:50.040
<v Speaker 1>the Pentagon nervous that nobody was taking their legal concerns

0:31:50.080 --> 0:31:54.160
<v Speaker 1>seriously regarding what could be extra judicial killings that are

0:31:54.160 --> 0:32:01.120
<v Speaker 1>taking place in the Caribbean Sea. You know, if there

0:32:01.280 --> 0:32:08.000
<v Speaker 1>is what I would call legal dissent and you have

0:32:09.720 --> 0:32:14.640
<v Speaker 1>legal count basically members of the military legal team saying, hey,

0:32:15.400 --> 0:32:18.360
<v Speaker 1>this is of questionable and none of how is it

0:32:18.440 --> 0:32:20.360
<v Speaker 1>going to get out? How are we going to get

0:32:20.360 --> 0:32:24.360
<v Speaker 1>this information out there if we know that our civilian

0:32:24.440 --> 0:32:28.360
<v Speaker 1>or our political leaders are essentially ignoring the legal advice

0:32:28.400 --> 0:32:30.960
<v Speaker 1>they're being given about whether what they're doing is legal

0:32:31.040 --> 0:32:31.280
<v Speaker 1>or not.

0:32:32.240 --> 0:32:34.600
<v Speaker 2>I think part of that answer, or part of my answer,

0:32:34.680 --> 0:32:38.640
<v Speaker 2>gets to the importance of congressional oversight. And look, I'm

0:32:38.640 --> 0:32:41.120
<v Speaker 2>on the Armed Services Committee that we don't have a

0:32:41.120 --> 0:32:45.200
<v Speaker 2>subpoena power. As Democrats and the minority, I expect we're

0:32:45.200 --> 0:32:45.600
<v Speaker 2>going to win.

0:32:45.640 --> 0:32:48.560
<v Speaker 1>Your chair at all, is the Chair of Armed Services

0:32:48.560 --> 0:32:52.520
<v Speaker 1>at all interested and at least finding out what authority

0:32:53.360 --> 0:32:57.840
<v Speaker 1>is being used here to just bomb ships that the

0:32:57.880 --> 0:33:00.920
<v Speaker 1>President claims are famous Psyco terrorists.

0:33:01.240 --> 0:33:03.440
<v Speaker 2>I hope so, because I can tell you my Democratic

0:33:03.480 --> 0:33:07.160
<v Speaker 2>colleagues do I suspect some of my Republican colleagues do.

0:33:07.280 --> 0:33:09.280
<v Speaker 2>I'd like them to put some muscle behind that.

0:33:09.240 --> 0:33:12.000
<v Speaker 3>Because all seems concerned, Yeah, what it's worth.

0:33:11.960 --> 0:33:14.000
<v Speaker 2>And say, he's a voice in the Senate who's actually

0:33:14.000 --> 0:33:16.880
<v Speaker 2>spoken up here. It looks like I'm a veteran of

0:33:16.920 --> 0:33:20.200
<v Speaker 2>the war in Iraq, Right, I'm.

0:33:19.520 --> 0:33:20.920
<v Speaker 3>A veteran of a war that I don't think we

0:33:20.960 --> 0:33:21.600
<v Speaker 3>should have fought.

0:33:21.600 --> 0:33:24.600
<v Speaker 2>But at least the Congress, for crying out loud, debated

0:33:24.640 --> 0:33:25.760
<v Speaker 2>and had an authorization.

0:33:25.920 --> 0:33:28.040
<v Speaker 1>They went to the UN and he went to Congress.

0:33:28.080 --> 0:33:31.680
<v Speaker 1>Like we could debate was the intelligence manipulated or wrong?

0:33:31.920 --> 0:33:32.120
<v Speaker 3>Right?

0:33:32.440 --> 0:33:35.560
<v Speaker 1>Was it purposely wrong or it just was wrong? We

0:33:35.640 --> 0:33:39.880
<v Speaker 1>could have that debate. But the but the separation of

0:33:39.920 --> 0:33:41.120
<v Speaker 1>powers was respected.

0:33:41.600 --> 0:33:42.440
<v Speaker 3>And that's my point.

0:33:42.440 --> 0:33:45.640
<v Speaker 2>And look, I think, and I'm convey this in private,

0:33:45.840 --> 0:33:49.719
<v Speaker 2>I'll say it to you here, my Republican counterparts. Right now, right,

0:33:49.800 --> 0:33:52.280
<v Speaker 2>they're enjoying full control of Washington. That's not going to

0:33:52.360 --> 0:33:57.200
<v Speaker 2>last forever. And you ought to have some respect for

0:33:57.800 --> 0:34:01.840
<v Speaker 2>Congress's power, the people's power president of matter what party

0:34:01.880 --> 0:34:04.880
<v Speaker 2>they're in, who is overstepping their authority? And I think

0:34:05.000 --> 0:34:08.160
<v Speaker 2>something like war powers is one of those places We've

0:34:08.160 --> 0:34:11.400
<v Speaker 2>seen presidents for a long time abuse this Congress not

0:34:11.520 --> 0:34:15.200
<v Speaker 2>asserted much more power here. And go back to the Constitution,

0:34:15.239 --> 0:34:17.919
<v Speaker 2>which says it is the Congress and the American people

0:34:17.920 --> 0:34:20.759
<v Speaker 2>who decide whether we go and start a war or

0:34:20.840 --> 0:34:21.919
<v Speaker 2>send Americans to fight.

0:34:23.000 --> 0:34:24.319
<v Speaker 1>You know, I was thinking about you came in in

0:34:24.360 --> 0:34:28.480
<v Speaker 1>twenty two and so you have no memory. You're not

0:34:28.560 --> 0:34:33.600
<v Speaker 1>part of the institution that was. And frankly, it's really

0:34:33.640 --> 0:34:35.560
<v Speaker 1>been about twenty years since the House knew how to

0:34:35.560 --> 0:34:39.759
<v Speaker 1>be bipartisan, where committee chairs and ranking members would there

0:34:39.800 --> 0:34:45.960
<v Speaker 1>was some coordination at some form or another. There's probably

0:34:46.000 --> 0:34:48.279
<v Speaker 1>slightly more left in the Senate, just because some of

0:34:48.320 --> 0:34:50.520
<v Speaker 1>those senators have been there a little bit longer. The

0:34:50.520 --> 0:34:54.040
<v Speaker 1>House is a little a little more new. But how

0:34:54.120 --> 0:34:57.640
<v Speaker 1>have you gone about trying to find Republican colleagues to

0:34:57.680 --> 0:34:58.360
<v Speaker 1>work with and.

0:35:00.080 --> 0:35:01.480
<v Speaker 3>What works best?

0:35:02.280 --> 0:35:04.919
<v Speaker 2>It's a great question. So I'll tell give you two

0:35:05.200 --> 0:35:09.480
<v Speaker 2>pieces of this. One is a very direct way I try.

0:35:09.480 --> 0:35:12.480
<v Speaker 2>I'm in this caucus for country caucus. It's veterans of

0:35:12.480 --> 0:35:16.080
<v Speaker 2>both parties. We mostly can find places to work together

0:35:16.200 --> 0:35:19.880
<v Speaker 2>on defense, maybe some veterans issues, and so that's a

0:35:19.920 --> 0:35:21.760
<v Speaker 2>real effort to try to find.

0:35:21.600 --> 0:35:22.480
<v Speaker 3>Has that gotten harder.

0:35:23.880 --> 0:35:26.279
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it has gotten harder, and it's gotten harder to

0:35:26.280 --> 0:35:30.440
<v Speaker 2>be candid with Donald Trump as president and the threat

0:35:30.760 --> 0:35:34.040
<v Speaker 2>that he always has over Republicans of they may lose

0:35:34.080 --> 0:35:38.680
<v Speaker 2>a primary and look the other and may be more productive.

0:35:39.200 --> 0:35:41.880
<v Speaker 2>Not more productive, but a way that I've seen some success.

0:35:42.480 --> 0:35:44.640
<v Speaker 2>You know, my district right on the border with Ohio,

0:35:44.719 --> 0:35:47.200
<v Speaker 2>right on the border with East Palestine. We had people

0:35:47.200 --> 0:35:51.399
<v Speaker 2>in the evacuation zone of that horrible derailment. We have

0:35:51.640 --> 0:35:54.520
<v Speaker 2>people in Beaver County who live through that fireball. So

0:35:54.560 --> 0:35:56.880
<v Speaker 2>I've been in the real safety fight since that happened.

0:35:57.520 --> 0:36:01.480
<v Speaker 2>I've found some Republicans to with me in that. Mike Ruley,

0:36:01.520 --> 0:36:04.200
<v Speaker 2>the Republican Member for East Palestine.

0:36:03.760 --> 0:36:05.479
<v Speaker 3>Is one of my co leades. JD.

0:36:05.640 --> 0:36:08.680
<v Speaker 2>Vance was before he was the Vice president, you know.

0:36:08.800 --> 0:36:11.600
<v Speaker 2>And so where I got to find partners to do

0:36:11.640 --> 0:36:12.480
<v Speaker 2>something that's right.

0:36:12.480 --> 0:36:14.239
<v Speaker 3>I do it.

0:36:14.239 --> 0:36:16.640
<v Speaker 2>It doesn't always work. I'm not naive about the moment

0:36:16.680 --> 0:36:19.960
<v Speaker 2>we're in. I'm frankly a little less interested in trying

0:36:19.960 --> 0:36:23.640
<v Speaker 2>to convince my Republican counterparts to come to my point

0:36:23.640 --> 0:36:25.279
<v Speaker 2>of view and a little more interested in winning power

0:36:25.320 --> 0:36:27.279
<v Speaker 2>and taking gavels out of their hands and after the

0:36:27.280 --> 0:36:29.680
<v Speaker 2>election next year. But we always got to try to

0:36:29.680 --> 0:36:30.360
<v Speaker 2>find some ways.

0:36:30.360 --> 0:36:33.320
<v Speaker 3>And I get it. And you're right though at the

0:36:33.320 --> 0:36:35.000
<v Speaker 3>beginning of the question, you know, I've.

0:36:34.719 --> 0:36:37.680
<v Speaker 2>Never served in a Congress that was something like I've

0:36:37.680 --> 0:36:41.439
<v Speaker 2>heard about, which is not the Congress.

0:36:40.360 --> 0:36:42.759
<v Speaker 1>The good old days, whatever the hell that means. All

0:36:42.800 --> 0:36:44.680
<v Speaker 1>I know is when I was younger, they kept telling

0:36:44.760 --> 0:36:46.359
<v Speaker 1>me about the good old days that it turns out

0:36:46.520 --> 0:36:47.560
<v Speaker 1>I was in the good old days.

0:36:47.560 --> 0:36:48.560
<v Speaker 3>But what did I know?

0:36:49.440 --> 0:36:51.880
<v Speaker 1>And yet the nineties were seen as the most divisive

0:36:51.880 --> 0:36:53.520
<v Speaker 1>era we'd ever had in politics.

0:36:54.040 --> 0:36:56.080
<v Speaker 3>My god, if it should come take a look.

0:36:56.320 --> 0:36:58.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, if only we could have to day, that's

0:36:58.680 --> 0:37:00.520
<v Speaker 1>what the how it felt in the night, because that

0:37:00.680 --> 0:37:03.600
<v Speaker 1>was compared to the eighties. Right, it's always about you

0:37:03.600 --> 0:37:07.640
<v Speaker 1>know what you're what are you comparing it to? Right now,

0:37:08.320 --> 0:37:10.440
<v Speaker 1>the good old days of New Gigrids at Bill Clinton

0:37:10.520 --> 0:37:14.840
<v Speaker 1>seem like it seemed like small potatoes. Well, the reason

0:37:14.840 --> 0:37:16.560
<v Speaker 1>I was setting me up on that, to be honest,

0:37:16.680 --> 0:37:19.480
<v Speaker 1>is is I thought that the one area where I

0:37:19.560 --> 0:37:25.320
<v Speaker 1>feel like there is real bipartisan interest in doing something

0:37:25.360 --> 0:37:29.920
<v Speaker 1>about this concentration of power is in tech, specifically with

0:37:30.120 --> 0:37:32.040
<v Speaker 1>social media and kids.

0:37:32.480 --> 0:37:34.879
<v Speaker 3>Now, I don't know why I can't. You can't get

0:37:34.920 --> 0:37:38.240
<v Speaker 3>people if we if we know this product's terrible for kids,

0:37:38.800 --> 0:37:41.520
<v Speaker 3>why should we assume it's not terrible for adults.

0:37:41.560 --> 0:37:44.279
<v Speaker 1>But one step at a time, if we can get

0:37:44.320 --> 0:37:48.760
<v Speaker 1>everybody agreeing this is a human brain experiment that should

0:37:48.800 --> 0:37:52.200
<v Speaker 1>no longer be used on our children, then maybe over

0:37:52.239 --> 0:37:56.200
<v Speaker 1>time we'll convince them that yet this, this digital smoking

0:37:56.280 --> 0:37:58.080
<v Speaker 1>is bad for you, no matter what age you are.

0:37:58.680 --> 0:38:02.160
<v Speaker 3>But there does seem to be real possibilities here.

0:38:02.640 --> 0:38:05.799
<v Speaker 1>On kids and sort of getting at the big tech

0:38:05.880 --> 0:38:09.880
<v Speaker 1>algorithm issue and all these things through the abuse of

0:38:09.920 --> 0:38:10.560
<v Speaker 1>our children.

0:38:11.760 --> 0:38:13.080
<v Speaker 3>It has been a rare place.

0:38:13.080 --> 0:38:16.279
<v Speaker 2>I mean when you've got Kathy Hokeel and Sarah alb

0:38:16.400 --> 0:38:19.000
<v Speaker 2>Sanders down in Arkansas both signing similar.

0:38:20.200 --> 0:38:21.480
<v Speaker 3>Chats in the Senate, right.

0:38:21.560 --> 0:38:24.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, So it's a place I see it in my

0:38:24.520 --> 0:38:27.440
<v Speaker 2>own district around smartphones and schools. I sent a survey

0:38:27.480 --> 0:38:29.279
<v Speaker 2>out to all my school districts just to see what

0:38:29.320 --> 0:38:32.600
<v Speaker 2>they're doing. Should you know, I asked a public survey

0:38:32.719 --> 0:38:35.440
<v Speaker 2>about banning smartphones from classrooms and it was like an

0:38:35.480 --> 0:38:38.600
<v Speaker 2>eighty twenty response. So it seems to be a place

0:38:39.160 --> 0:38:41.960
<v Speaker 2>where it hasn't fallen down on the sort you know,

0:38:42.000 --> 0:38:46.800
<v Speaker 2>the typical partisan line. Parents are very worried about what's.

0:38:46.560 --> 0:38:48.920
<v Speaker 3>Going on with the kids. I'm a dad, I got

0:38:48.920 --> 0:38:50.200
<v Speaker 3>young kids, Believe me, I'm worried.

0:38:50.640 --> 0:38:53.799
<v Speaker 2>And so maybe it's the one place we still have

0:38:53.880 --> 0:38:57.000
<v Speaker 2>where we can find something to do to protect these kids,

0:38:57.160 --> 0:39:01.040
<v Speaker 2>and it hasn't become the usual source of d versus are.

0:39:01.080 --> 0:39:03.240
<v Speaker 2>I think there's real anger at the big tech companies.

0:39:03.800 --> 0:39:06.920
<v Speaker 2>I think not just parents. People know this stuff is

0:39:06.960 --> 0:39:10.200
<v Speaker 2>designed to be addictive. Right, You're talking about like teenage

0:39:10.200 --> 0:39:14.120
<v Speaker 2>and preteen brains. Those kids are vulnerable, and I think

0:39:14.760 --> 0:39:18.440
<v Speaker 2>politicians are just catching up to really how frustrated, especially

0:39:18.440 --> 0:39:20.000
<v Speaker 2>the parents are. Have you got to do something to

0:39:20.000 --> 0:39:20.920
<v Speaker 2>protect these kids?

0:39:21.239 --> 0:39:21.319
<v Speaker 3>No?

0:39:21.480 --> 0:39:24.000
<v Speaker 1>And it feels like once we get everybody focused on that,

0:39:24.040 --> 0:39:24.759
<v Speaker 1>then we're all going to.

0:39:24.680 --> 0:39:28.520
<v Speaker 3>Say, hey, wait a minute, what was everybody else? What

0:39:28.600 --> 0:39:29.480
<v Speaker 3>about everybody else?

0:39:29.640 --> 0:39:32.800
<v Speaker 1>And then of course, like we also have this huge

0:39:32.960 --> 0:39:35.480
<v Speaker 1>content and that's the other part of this, and this

0:39:35.560 --> 0:39:38.479
<v Speaker 1>is where, you know, I had a conversation with Steve

0:39:38.480 --> 0:39:40.719
<v Speaker 1>Bannon who said, you know who was a big fan

0:39:40.760 --> 0:39:45.400
<v Speaker 1>of Lina Kahn. And he said something that was frankly

0:39:45.400 --> 0:39:47.960
<v Speaker 1>a very agreeable statement. He said, he goes, you know,

0:39:48.080 --> 0:39:52.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm I'm always nervous about too much concentration of power.

0:39:52.440 --> 0:39:55.680
<v Speaker 1>Me too, And I'm like me too, right, and he goes,

0:39:56.000 --> 0:39:58.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm focused on government and media, and I'm like, okay,

0:39:59.040 --> 0:40:01.920
<v Speaker 1>except look what we're doing in tech, Look what we've.

0:40:01.760 --> 0:40:03.240
<v Speaker 3>Done with crypto.

0:40:03.680 --> 0:40:06.319
<v Speaker 1>And I've got my questions about it as it is.

0:40:06.920 --> 0:40:09.880
<v Speaker 1>But what we are doing is we're concentrating a small

0:40:09.880 --> 0:40:13.080
<v Speaker 1>group of people to control. I mean, look at media now.

0:40:13.320 --> 0:40:15.600
<v Speaker 1>It is all Donald Trump's friends who are owning a

0:40:15.640 --> 0:40:20.720
<v Speaker 1>piece of TikTok. You're now going to have potentially one family,

0:40:21.239 --> 0:40:24.719
<v Speaker 1>two families control Fox, CBS and CNN.

0:40:25.200 --> 0:40:25.319
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:40:25.360 --> 0:40:28.560
<v Speaker 1>If the Ellisons go through with both CBS and an

0:40:28.680 --> 0:40:33.440
<v Speaker 1>acquisition of Warner Brothers, that's a huge concentration of power,

0:40:34.200 --> 0:40:38.479
<v Speaker 1>which I don't understand where the small c conservatives are.

0:40:38.360 --> 0:40:39.359
<v Speaker 3>On this well.

0:40:39.360 --> 0:40:43.239
<v Speaker 2>And I think look in this moment, especially where you're

0:40:43.280 --> 0:40:46.800
<v Speaker 2>seeing a president and his allies willing to stifle dissent

0:40:46.920 --> 0:40:50.239
<v Speaker 2>and use the power they have to kick people off TV.

0:40:51.080 --> 0:40:51.279
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:40:52.040 --> 0:40:55.239
<v Speaker 2>The problem of concentration of power is related to this.

0:40:55.719 --> 0:40:58.160
<v Speaker 2>If you've got a diffuse competitive market, it's a lot

0:40:58.200 --> 0:41:01.920
<v Speaker 2>harder to bully. Yeah, a very competitive market versus just

0:41:01.920 --> 0:41:06.399
<v Speaker 2>a handful of corporations who you have hanging over their head,

0:41:06.560 --> 0:41:09.360
<v Speaker 2>the threat of blocking a merger, for instance, right finding

0:41:09.400 --> 0:41:12.319
<v Speaker 2>some use of government power you can use to get

0:41:12.360 --> 0:41:15.879
<v Speaker 2>action that you want somewhere else. The competition would make

0:41:15.920 --> 0:41:18.359
<v Speaker 2>that a lot harder to do. And by the way,

0:41:18.400 --> 0:41:21.360
<v Speaker 2>it might be better for a variety of viewpoints. It

0:41:21.440 --> 0:41:25.560
<v Speaker 2>might be better to have different content creators and different

0:41:26.200 --> 0:41:29.239
<v Speaker 2>sports and TV and news platforms, maybe better for consumers.

0:41:29.360 --> 0:41:31.200
<v Speaker 2>And so I think these things are linked. I think

0:41:31.239 --> 0:41:34.920
<v Speaker 2>the economic fight and for me, I very much include

0:41:35.160 --> 0:41:38.840
<v Speaker 2>that concentration of power right that Leana Conn and others

0:41:38.840 --> 0:41:41.520
<v Speaker 2>were part of in the Biden administration that it seemed,

0:41:41.520 --> 0:41:44.240
<v Speaker 2>at least at the beginning there might be some carryover

0:41:44.280 --> 0:41:47.680
<v Speaker 2>into this administration that now seems to be happening. I

0:41:47.680 --> 0:41:50.120
<v Speaker 2>think that fight is really important, and it goes to

0:41:50.800 --> 0:41:52.880
<v Speaker 2>beating back any attempts.

0:41:52.400 --> 0:41:54.920
<v Speaker 3>To weekend free speech and week in the constitution.

0:41:55.000 --> 0:42:02.520
<v Speaker 2>I think they are very very linked.

0:42:05.600 --> 0:42:07.600
<v Speaker 1>Well, this gets it too, And I'm curious how you

0:42:07.640 --> 0:42:10.359
<v Speaker 1>answer this question, because I'm sure you've had a constituent

0:42:11.160 --> 0:42:13.520
<v Speaker 1>when you bring up this corruption issue, and I'm like,

0:42:13.880 --> 0:42:16.440
<v Speaker 1>I am just alarmed at the level of pay to

0:42:16.480 --> 0:42:19.840
<v Speaker 1>play that we have right now, and I'll bring that

0:42:20.000 --> 0:42:23.000
<v Speaker 1>up and I'll have somebody say, well, they're all kind

0:42:23.040 --> 0:42:28.200
<v Speaker 1>of corrupt, and you're like, yeah, but like this goes

0:42:28.239 --> 0:42:31.120
<v Speaker 1>to eleven, you know, like you know doing I'm sorry

0:42:31.200 --> 0:42:33.200
<v Speaker 1>for the gen X reference there to spinal tap, but

0:42:33.600 --> 0:42:36.279
<v Speaker 1>you know it is I hear you. I know, I

0:42:36.480 --> 0:42:39.760
<v Speaker 1>just you know you're here, You're talking like a middle

0:42:39.760 --> 0:42:42.480
<v Speaker 1>aged guy and I'm like, yeah, I'm a decade plus

0:42:42.480 --> 0:42:43.200
<v Speaker 1>older than you.

0:42:43.320 --> 0:42:47.520
<v Speaker 3>God love us, But what do you say to that?

0:42:47.600 --> 0:42:50.200
<v Speaker 1>Because I really do think the biggest problem we've got

0:42:50.360 --> 0:42:54.840
<v Speaker 1>is with the public is they agree that what's happening

0:42:55.000 --> 0:42:57.439
<v Speaker 1>is bad, but they sit there and say it's hey, man,

0:42:58.040 --> 0:43:00.200
<v Speaker 1>I thought the last guy was somewhat corrupt to you

0:43:00.239 --> 0:43:02.239
<v Speaker 1>may not have thought he was as corrupt as I did,

0:43:02.239 --> 0:43:04.640
<v Speaker 1>but it certainly didn't look any that much better.

0:43:04.680 --> 0:43:05.960
<v Speaker 3>And all of these.

0:43:05.760 --> 0:43:09.480
<v Speaker 1>People get rich off of politics, whether it's liberals or conservatives.

0:43:09.760 --> 0:43:11.919
<v Speaker 1>And the thing is is that even I could say, well,

0:43:12.080 --> 0:43:14.480
<v Speaker 1>it's lopside. It's like when everybody wants to have this

0:43:14.560 --> 0:43:17.600
<v Speaker 1>fight over who whose extremists are more violent, it doesn't

0:43:17.640 --> 0:43:21.600
<v Speaker 1>matter if everybody's got violent actors on their side. You

0:43:21.680 --> 0:43:24.400
<v Speaker 1>need to police it, But how do we break this

0:43:24.600 --> 0:43:28.160
<v Speaker 1>sort of that cynical while they're all corrupt? So I

0:43:28.200 --> 0:43:29.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, I even had people say, yeah, I know

0:43:30.040 --> 0:43:32.239
<v Speaker 1>Trump's corrupt, but at least he's authentic about it.

0:43:33.320 --> 0:43:36.560
<v Speaker 2>So I'll give you an example on congressional stock trading. Okay,

0:43:37.040 --> 0:43:40.200
<v Speaker 2>I had constituents at town hall or Senior Center event,

0:43:40.719 --> 0:43:42.200
<v Speaker 2>and I'll bring it up or they'll bring it up

0:43:42.680 --> 0:43:45.080
<v Speaker 2>and they might think they've so I'm gonna get chick.

0:43:45.080 --> 0:43:47.040
<v Speaker 2>So I'm going to name some Democrat who abuse this,

0:43:47.120 --> 0:43:48.600
<v Speaker 2>and then my answer is that I don't care. We

0:43:48.760 --> 0:43:50.879
<v Speaker 2>no one should be doing this. Let's ban the damn thing.

0:43:51.440 --> 0:43:54.359
<v Speaker 2>And it's an easy anti corruption thing that we should do.

0:43:54.760 --> 0:43:57.279
<v Speaker 2>And yet I think it actually it's one example of

0:43:57.320 --> 0:44:01.760
<v Speaker 2>many of this stuff that just three needs distrust for people.

0:44:02.200 --> 0:44:06.080
<v Speaker 2>Right when you see politicians do this, people know it's gross.

0:44:06.120 --> 0:44:08.279
<v Speaker 2>They're not dumb, people are smart. They know that when

0:44:08.280 --> 0:44:11.560
<v Speaker 2>politicians get rich doing this stuff, it's crooked. And I

0:44:11.560 --> 0:44:13.880
<v Speaker 2>can cite the same stuff about the abuse of the

0:44:14.200 --> 0:44:16.719
<v Speaker 2>mean coins and everything else in the administration, but I

0:44:16.719 --> 0:44:20.520
<v Speaker 2>think the congressional stock trading really hits for people, and

0:44:20.560 --> 0:44:22.279
<v Speaker 2>you got to be willing to just say I don't

0:44:22.280 --> 0:44:23.640
<v Speaker 2>care who is doing this, it's wrong.

0:44:25.320 --> 0:44:26.040
<v Speaker 3>You just need that.

0:44:26.080 --> 0:44:28.560
<v Speaker 2>And I think it seems like a low hanging through

0:44:28.560 --> 0:44:30.840
<v Speaker 2>of something we could take on and just do right now,

0:44:31.400 --> 0:44:33.440
<v Speaker 2>and we ought to do. And frankly, there has been

0:44:33.640 --> 0:44:37.600
<v Speaker 2>movement finally of some legislation that you've got Dems and

0:44:37.600 --> 0:44:40.880
<v Speaker 2>Republicans both on we should just do this stuff.

0:44:40.920 --> 0:44:45.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's crazy. Notion here, what if you combine

0:44:45.840 --> 0:44:52.160
<v Speaker 1>the Congressional stock band with a pay raise? Oh gosh, look,

0:44:52.200 --> 0:44:54.279
<v Speaker 1>I know that it's about Look you know, I'm one

0:44:54.280 --> 0:44:56.640
<v Speaker 1>of these people who at least understands the life you live,

0:44:57.680 --> 0:45:03.319
<v Speaker 1>and like you know, if you don't want members of

0:45:03.360 --> 0:45:05.880
<v Speaker 1>Congress to interact with each other, then make them sleep

0:45:05.880 --> 0:45:08.360
<v Speaker 1>in their own offices and make them not. If you

0:45:08.440 --> 0:45:10.719
<v Speaker 1>do want them to interact, then you better pay them

0:45:10.760 --> 0:45:14.040
<v Speaker 1>a decent salary so they can maybe have their family

0:45:14.560 --> 0:45:17.600
<v Speaker 1>in Washington. And if you move your family to Washington,

0:45:17.600 --> 0:45:20.040
<v Speaker 1>you're more likely to get to know people across the

0:45:20.080 --> 0:45:21.160
<v Speaker 1>aisle than if you don't.

0:45:21.160 --> 0:45:21.640
<v Speaker 3>You end up.

0:45:21.760 --> 0:45:24.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, look, there's I could I could sit here

0:45:24.160 --> 0:45:27.600
<v Speaker 1>and talk myself in circles about what's better or worse.

0:45:28.160 --> 0:45:32.040
<v Speaker 1>But if I've been empathetic to. One argument about the

0:45:32.080 --> 0:45:36.400
<v Speaker 1>Congressional stock band is, if you're a middle class person

0:45:36.560 --> 0:45:39.040
<v Speaker 1>who's had a decent job, got a four to one k,

0:45:39.800 --> 0:45:40.960
<v Speaker 1>what are you supposed to do?

0:45:41.000 --> 0:45:41.799
<v Speaker 3>What you get there?

0:45:42.440 --> 0:45:46.759
<v Speaker 1>And you get it, but hey, I'm trying to plan

0:45:46.840 --> 0:45:50.520
<v Speaker 1>for retirement too, and it isn't a very you know.

0:45:51.800 --> 0:45:53.319
<v Speaker 1>I know, it sounds like a lot of money that

0:45:53.360 --> 0:45:55.160
<v Speaker 1>you make, and it is to a lot of people.

0:45:55.560 --> 0:45:58.840
<v Speaker 3>But what I always say is great, try having two

0:45:59.000 --> 0:46:02.320
<v Speaker 3>households on that one hundred and six seventy two thousand

0:46:02.320 --> 0:46:04.000
<v Speaker 3>dollars a year salary. That's hard.

0:46:04.480 --> 0:46:06.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, no one's going to feel bad for us.

0:46:06.000 --> 0:46:08.120
<v Speaker 3>And you know, you know, you know that and like

0:46:08.239 --> 0:46:09.839
<v Speaker 3>it to the point on.

0:46:10.239 --> 0:46:12.279
<v Speaker 1>I know, I'm like baiting. I don't mean to pitch it,

0:46:12.360 --> 0:46:14.600
<v Speaker 1>like to make it, but I do think that it is.

0:46:14.719 --> 0:46:19.440
<v Speaker 1>It is not the easiest lifestyle for a member of Congress,

0:46:20.000 --> 0:46:23.279
<v Speaker 1>and yet they take so much. There's this perception that

0:46:23.360 --> 0:46:24.280
<v Speaker 1>life is so easy.

0:46:25.000 --> 0:46:27.440
<v Speaker 2>One look, even let's let's do the retiring example you

0:46:27.480 --> 0:46:32.000
<v Speaker 2>talk about. You could just have ETFs or mutual funds

0:46:32.040 --> 0:46:35.800
<v Speaker 2>and you are trading individual companies, which I think is

0:46:35.840 --> 0:46:38.839
<v Speaker 2>such a an obvious red flag given the count.

0:46:39.040 --> 0:46:42.040
<v Speaker 1>And we saw this during the pandemic, where wow, Richard

0:46:42.040 --> 0:46:44.640
<v Speaker 1>Burr made a whole bunch of trades literally an hour

0:46:44.760 --> 0:46:47.319
<v Speaker 1>after he got the word about what was coming with

0:46:47.360 --> 0:46:49.239
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic, like, yeah, that was bad.

0:46:50.120 --> 0:46:52.680
<v Speaker 3>So I'm not going to cry tears for you know that.

0:46:52.680 --> 0:46:53.400
<v Speaker 3>That get that.

0:46:54.560 --> 0:46:57.160
<v Speaker 2>Look at the end of the day, this is public service.

0:46:57.719 --> 0:46:59.520
<v Speaker 2>It's a great honor to get to do this job.

0:47:01.160 --> 0:47:05.080
<v Speaker 2>It is a public trust. And I think it's one

0:47:05.080 --> 0:47:08.000
<v Speaker 2>of those things that if the members who won't support

0:47:08.000 --> 0:47:10.040
<v Speaker 2>a band were to look themselves in the mirror and ask, like,

0:47:10.040 --> 0:47:11.960
<v Speaker 2>because this is good for public trust in our government,

0:47:12.000 --> 0:47:14.640
<v Speaker 2>they would say, of course, stop or they're deluding themselves.

0:47:14.680 --> 0:47:16.960
<v Speaker 2>I don't get it. I just think it's an obvious

0:47:16.960 --> 0:47:20.000
<v Speaker 2>one and your point's well taken, but man, we ought

0:47:20.000 --> 0:47:21.000
<v Speaker 2>to just here's.

0:47:20.840 --> 0:47:23.640
<v Speaker 3>Okay, here's the problem I'm trying to solve for yaes.

0:47:23.920 --> 0:47:26.719
<v Speaker 1>I want a working class person to be able to percent,

0:47:27.000 --> 0:47:28.719
<v Speaker 1>to be able to be a member of Congress. And

0:47:28.760 --> 0:47:32.000
<v Speaker 1>the way it all works now is you really need

0:47:32.040 --> 0:47:35.959
<v Speaker 1>to be wealthy in order to be an effective member

0:47:36.040 --> 0:47:39.080
<v Speaker 1>of the House, and that's that shouldn't be how it works.

0:47:39.640 --> 0:47:41.480
<v Speaker 2>I agree, and that's a real problem. And part of

0:47:41.480 --> 0:47:46.360
<v Speaker 2>it is look, when we've got candidates, and the Republicans

0:47:46.400 --> 0:47:48.400
<v Speaker 2>will have their own version of this with the NRCC

0:47:48.440 --> 0:47:49.840
<v Speaker 2>and all the rest, but you know, it's part of

0:47:49.840 --> 0:47:52.840
<v Speaker 2>it is trying to give candidates who come from a

0:47:52.880 --> 0:47:56.279
<v Speaker 2>working class background a shot to run. I'm supporting Bob

0:47:56.320 --> 0:47:58.960
<v Speaker 2>Brooks running in the Lehigh Valley of Pennsylvania. Is a firefighter.

0:47:59.360 --> 0:48:01.719
<v Speaker 2>You know, that's that's not the norm for folks who

0:48:01.800 --> 0:48:02.840
<v Speaker 2>end up being in Congress.

0:48:03.040 --> 0:48:05.160
<v Speaker 3>No, it's a lot of lawyers. No offense to your JD.

0:48:05.360 --> 0:48:08.480
<v Speaker 1>But like, in fact, that is a lion's share of

0:48:08.480 --> 0:48:10.320
<v Speaker 1>the Democrats that are in the House or lawyers.

0:48:10.400 --> 0:48:12.400
<v Speaker 2>Right, yeah, no, I get it. It look like at the

0:48:12.440 --> 0:48:14.400
<v Speaker 2>end of the day, we're lawmaking. That helps a little bit.

0:48:14.440 --> 0:48:17.120
<v Speaker 2>But man, you've got to have different perspectives. It can't

0:48:17.120 --> 0:48:20.799
<v Speaker 2>just be one thing. And I think that's a really

0:48:20.840 --> 0:48:22.520
<v Speaker 2>good question, and what we do about it is not

0:48:22.560 --> 0:48:24.680
<v Speaker 2>an easy answer. But a part of it has to

0:48:24.719 --> 0:48:28.640
<v Speaker 2>be folks helping when we've got good candidates who come

0:48:28.640 --> 0:48:32.560
<v Speaker 2>from a working class background, getting some supported help, because man,

0:48:32.800 --> 0:48:36.720
<v Speaker 2>the fundraising reality of getting elected to Congress is obscene.

0:48:37.280 --> 0:48:40.560
<v Speaker 2>We can spend an hour talking about campaign finance. But

0:48:40.920 --> 0:48:43.440
<v Speaker 2>it's not an easy thing, and it's I think we

0:48:43.480 --> 0:48:46.440
<v Speaker 2>would do better as a Congress, as a country if

0:48:46.480 --> 0:48:49.520
<v Speaker 2>we have people who came from far more normal jobs

0:48:49.560 --> 0:48:50.120
<v Speaker 2>and careers.

0:48:50.920 --> 0:48:52.680
<v Speaker 1>I want to get you out of here on two

0:48:52.680 --> 0:48:55.959
<v Speaker 1>more questions, once politics and one will be easy because

0:48:56.000 --> 0:48:58.200
<v Speaker 1>it's it should be easy because it's sports.

0:48:58.719 --> 0:49:00.520
<v Speaker 3>But I'm a politican front.

0:49:01.800 --> 0:49:04.799
<v Speaker 1>It seems like every Democratic strategists out there, and no

0:49:04.880 --> 0:49:08.400
<v Speaker 1>matter the flavor that they may be ideologically, all is

0:49:08.400 --> 0:49:11.120
<v Speaker 1>agreeing on the same thing, which is, hey, Democrats need

0:49:11.160 --> 0:49:14.120
<v Speaker 1>to drop the culture stuff and just focus on economics

0:49:14.160 --> 0:49:17.480
<v Speaker 1>and sort of day to day things. It's easy to say,

0:49:18.000 --> 0:49:20.960
<v Speaker 1>but it's turned out to be really difficult in practice,

0:49:20.960 --> 0:49:21.720
<v Speaker 1>hasn't it.

0:49:22.719 --> 0:49:24.520
<v Speaker 3>I guess that here's what I'll say.

0:49:24.520 --> 0:49:27.760
<v Speaker 2>And look, I talk about my own experience running and winning,

0:49:27.800 --> 0:49:32.160
<v Speaker 2>and I've never backtracked on people's civil rights. And you know,

0:49:32.239 --> 0:49:35.120
<v Speaker 2>my part of the world is very competitive. It used

0:49:35.160 --> 0:49:36.640
<v Speaker 2>to be, you know a lot of the old blue

0:49:36.640 --> 0:49:38.440
<v Speaker 2>dog Dems in my part of the world who were

0:49:39.040 --> 0:49:40.960
<v Speaker 2>anti abortion. I was just going to say a lot

0:49:40.960 --> 0:49:45.160
<v Speaker 2>of pro life Democrats have represented Western Pennsylvania in the past.

0:49:44.880 --> 0:49:47.520
<v Speaker 2>I want to say, Mike Doyle was I don't remember

0:49:47.600 --> 0:49:49.439
<v Speaker 2>for sure, but I feel like that was the case.

0:49:49.480 --> 0:49:52.440
<v Speaker 2>But matter, I guess where I'm going is I have

0:49:52.560 --> 0:49:55.640
<v Speaker 2>put this economic fight front center, and I've also been

0:49:55.680 --> 0:49:59.120
<v Speaker 2>clear I don't have to backtrack on anybody's freedom to

0:49:59.200 --> 0:50:01.120
<v Speaker 2>do that, and I've been talking about it on the

0:50:01.280 --> 0:50:04.239
<v Speaker 2>stump and at rallies. As much as Donald Trump might

0:50:04.239 --> 0:50:07.640
<v Speaker 2>want to divide people, right, some trans person wanting dignity

0:50:07.680 --> 0:50:10.040
<v Speaker 2>is not why you're housing or your healthcare is a ripoff,

0:50:10.520 --> 0:50:13.280
<v Speaker 2>and We're not going to fall for that. I don't

0:50:13.280 --> 0:50:17.640
<v Speaker 2>think the path to Democrats rebuilding trust is now throwing

0:50:17.680 --> 0:50:20.040
<v Speaker 2>people under the bus. And by the way, the other

0:50:20.080 --> 0:50:23.279
<v Speaker 2>side of this, the Republicans ought to be careful because

0:50:23.320 --> 0:50:25.839
<v Speaker 2>not only are they hurting people, they're spending a lot

0:50:25.840 --> 0:50:29.239
<v Speaker 2>of time, a lot of time worrying about inspecting kids

0:50:29.360 --> 0:50:32.080
<v Speaker 2>genitals on sports fields when they are failing to bring

0:50:32.120 --> 0:50:35.879
<v Speaker 2>down the cost of living, And that is I think

0:50:35.960 --> 0:50:39.040
<v Speaker 2>them failing at their core task and spending way too

0:50:39.120 --> 0:50:41.480
<v Speaker 2>much time picking on kids and what sports they're going to.

0:50:41.400 --> 0:50:43.040
<v Speaker 3>Play in your community.

0:50:43.239 --> 0:50:45.919
<v Speaker 1>What is the one big economic issue that you think

0:50:46.000 --> 0:50:50.719
<v Speaker 1>is about to just explode that you know we'll like

0:50:51.200 --> 0:50:53.680
<v Speaker 1>people aren't realizing it about three to six months X

0:50:53.800 --> 0:50:54.480
<v Speaker 1>is going to happen.

0:50:54.960 --> 0:50:57.680
<v Speaker 2>People's energy bills are already been going up and they're

0:50:57.680 --> 0:51:00.440
<v Speaker 2>mad about it. And that's on top of healthcare getting

0:51:00.480 --> 0:51:01.480
<v Speaker 2>more and more expensive.

0:51:01.600 --> 0:51:02.320
<v Speaker 3>Is there a good.

0:51:02.120 --> 0:51:05.399
<v Speaker 1>Explanation on energy what's happening here? Because this doesn't feel

0:51:05.440 --> 0:51:06.280
<v Speaker 1>like an easy answer.

0:51:06.960 --> 0:51:09.839
<v Speaker 3>And here's the things. Yeah, it's a mix.

0:51:09.840 --> 0:51:12.919
<v Speaker 2>I've been working with Congressional Research to get really dug

0:51:12.960 --> 0:51:15.480
<v Speaker 2>in on what's going on in my part of the country.

0:51:15.560 --> 0:51:16.760
<v Speaker 3>Pj's across the board.

0:51:16.760 --> 0:51:19.239
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if you saw the New Jersey governor's race,

0:51:19.320 --> 0:51:21.480
<v Speaker 1>both candidates are, hey, we're going to try to fight

0:51:21.560 --> 0:51:24.920
<v Speaker 1>for you, Like yeah, when you see both candidates do

0:51:24.960 --> 0:51:26.840
<v Speaker 1>it something, you're like, oh, this is everywhere.

0:51:27.480 --> 0:51:30.520
<v Speaker 3>Trust me. I mean my wife and I had this discussion. Yeah,

0:51:30.640 --> 0:51:32.960
<v Speaker 3>have we always paid this much? Like no, this is

0:51:33.080 --> 0:51:35.759
<v Speaker 3>really a new spike. Yeah, there's something happening out here.

0:51:36.000 --> 0:51:38.880
<v Speaker 2>You've got a problem with not enough power generation period,

0:51:38.960 --> 0:51:40.280
<v Speaker 2>no matter the source of power.

0:51:40.320 --> 0:51:42.560
<v Speaker 3>That's a real problem. And you know, you.

0:51:42.560 --> 0:51:45.840
<v Speaker 2>Also got a mix of the traditional co ops, but

0:51:46.040 --> 0:51:49.120
<v Speaker 2>you've got these investor owned or private owned utilities that's

0:51:49.120 --> 0:51:50.680
<v Speaker 2>seen to be jacking up prices at.

0:51:50.640 --> 0:51:53.120
<v Speaker 3>Higher rates than the old co ops. If you've got

0:51:53.120 --> 0:51:54.120
<v Speaker 3>that in your part of the world.

0:51:54.680 --> 0:51:59.120
<v Speaker 2>And I think it's a power generation problem. It's the monopolies.

0:51:59.160 --> 0:52:03.440
<v Speaker 2>They're all monopoly essentially on the transmission distribution side, some

0:52:03.480 --> 0:52:07.200
<v Speaker 2>of those investor owned companies there. There's not an easy answer,

0:52:07.239 --> 0:52:09.160
<v Speaker 2>but man, I think people are mad about it, and

0:52:09.200 --> 0:52:11.520
<v Speaker 2>I think the Republican Big beautiful.

0:52:11.080 --> 0:52:12.720
<v Speaker 3>Bill just made it worse.

0:52:13.280 --> 0:52:15.160
<v Speaker 2>And we're going to see as those tax credits go

0:52:15.200 --> 0:52:18.879
<v Speaker 2>away for things like getting new power, new transmission going,

0:52:19.000 --> 0:52:20.680
<v Speaker 2>that's going to make bills go up.

0:52:21.000 --> 0:52:23.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm old enough to remember when the Republican stance on

0:52:23.880 --> 0:52:27.719
<v Speaker 1>energy was all of the above. I'm and suddenly it's

0:52:27.760 --> 0:52:31.840
<v Speaker 1>no longer all of the above. It's whatever. President Trump

0:52:32.000 --> 0:52:35.880
<v Speaker 1>likes oil and gas, he likes nuclear, he's okay with solar,

0:52:35.880 --> 0:52:36.600
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't like wind.

0:52:36.600 --> 0:52:38.560
<v Speaker 3>And you're like, what does it matter? Don't we want

0:52:38.600 --> 0:52:39.759
<v Speaker 3>all of it? Tell you why?

0:52:39.800 --> 0:52:42.680
<v Speaker 2>You talk to people in the building trades in western Pennsylvania.

0:52:43.400 --> 0:52:46.919
<v Speaker 2>They would just like jobs and any any energy work.

0:52:47.080 --> 0:52:48.280
<v Speaker 2>Those can be good jobs.

0:52:51.320 --> 0:52:52.799
<v Speaker 1>Are you going to go to the you know the

0:52:52.920 --> 0:52:55.239
<v Speaker 1>your I assume you're a beloved Pittsburgh Steelers fan.

0:52:55.560 --> 0:52:55.919
<v Speaker 3>I am.

0:52:56.560 --> 0:53:00.400
<v Speaker 1>I think when we when this, this will air before you,

0:53:00.440 --> 0:53:02.000
<v Speaker 1>Pittsburgh's going Ireland right.

0:53:02.120 --> 0:53:05.319
<v Speaker 2>Double right about this coming Sunday, I think, yeah.

0:53:04.800 --> 0:53:07.040
<v Speaker 3>That's got to be a tempting field trip.

0:53:07.120 --> 0:53:10.600
<v Speaker 2>No, I'm not going. I'm staying home. I'll watched from Afar.

0:53:10.719 --> 0:53:12.640
<v Speaker 2>It's going to be like an early game on Sundays

0:53:12.719 --> 0:53:12.960
<v Speaker 2>as well.

0:53:13.000 --> 0:53:14.759
<v Speaker 1>Well the Rooneyes. I mean, I just think, what a

0:53:15.280 --> 0:53:17.759
<v Speaker 1>right the pop on me was the ambassador. I mean,

0:53:18.040 --> 0:53:18.680
<v Speaker 1>that's going to be.

0:53:19.360 --> 0:53:23.200
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I have a feeling that's going to be

0:53:23.239 --> 0:53:24.439
<v Speaker 3>a Pittsburgh home game.

0:53:25.120 --> 0:53:29.160
<v Speaker 2>You know, some tells me if Steelers will travel well everywhere,

0:53:29.200 --> 0:53:31.359
<v Speaker 2>and I'm gonna guess we got good fans in Double.

0:53:31.719 --> 0:53:34.400
<v Speaker 3>How how you holding up with the Aaron Rodgers experience.

0:53:34.640 --> 0:53:38.040
<v Speaker 3>I'm from a weird fan. I know, I know this world.

0:53:38.120 --> 0:53:41.080
<v Speaker 2>Well, he's older than me, I'm pretty sure, which is bizarre.

0:53:41.239 --> 0:53:43.920
<v Speaker 3>You guys are about the same age. I think that's right. Yeah. Yeah.

0:53:44.160 --> 0:53:47.640
<v Speaker 2>The New England win, so we're recording this Monday after.

0:53:47.480 --> 0:53:49.439
<v Speaker 3>We just beat the Patriots. It was kind of an

0:53:49.640 --> 0:53:53.279
<v Speaker 3>ugly game. You know, better win than lose. Better the

0:53:53.280 --> 0:53:53.919
<v Speaker 3>win than lose.

0:53:55.160 --> 0:54:00.000
<v Speaker 1>He is and and then of course there's the Pittsburgh Pirates.

0:53:59.840 --> 0:54:03.280
<v Speaker 1>It is why does an incredible franchise with its history

0:54:03.320 --> 0:54:06.279
<v Speaker 1>like that? You know, I say this, I come from

0:54:06.280 --> 0:54:09.400
<v Speaker 1>Miami and we didn't have baseball on I was growing up.

0:54:10.120 --> 0:54:12.239
<v Speaker 1>I moved to Washington and didn't have baseball. Now has

0:54:12.280 --> 0:54:16.720
<v Speaker 1>the Nats. I feel like Pittsburgh's just a worse version

0:54:16.920 --> 0:54:21.120
<v Speaker 1>than what Miami and Washington have experienced, which is owners

0:54:21.160 --> 0:54:23.840
<v Speaker 1>that just either don't have the resources or don't spend

0:54:23.840 --> 0:54:24.480
<v Speaker 1>the resources.

0:54:26.160 --> 0:54:27.799
<v Speaker 2>I think it's a simple question of whether you're going

0:54:27.840 --> 0:54:29.480
<v Speaker 2>to spend and invest in the team. I mean, look,

0:54:29.520 --> 0:54:31.960
<v Speaker 2>we play in a beautiful ballpark. You got a fan

0:54:32.040 --> 0:54:35.520
<v Speaker 2>base who will show up a magnetic ballpark, meaning people

0:54:35.560 --> 0:54:38.719
<v Speaker 2>will travel. You hear it all the time, Like you know,

0:54:38.960 --> 0:54:39.319
<v Speaker 2>there's a.

0:54:39.239 --> 0:54:41.720
<v Speaker 3>Whole baseball community that loves to do the ballpark traveling.

0:54:41.760 --> 0:54:42.160
<v Speaker 3>I mean yeah.

0:54:42.160 --> 0:54:44.040
<v Speaker 1>In fact, my son is one of them. He's one

0:54:44.040 --> 0:54:46.280
<v Speaker 1>of the few eighteen year olds that actually likes baseball.

0:54:46.480 --> 0:54:48.319
<v Speaker 1>As he says, he's in college and he goes, yeah,

0:54:48.400 --> 0:54:50.520
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to go check out a Rangers game. He's

0:54:50.680 --> 0:54:52.960
<v Speaker 1>down in Texas and he had a hard time recruiting

0:54:53.000 --> 0:54:55.160
<v Speaker 1>people to go check out a baseball game, Like, that's

0:54:55.280 --> 0:55:00.319
<v Speaker 1>how badly baseball is not penetrating gen Z. But he

0:55:00.400 --> 0:55:03.600
<v Speaker 1>loves to see all the parks and PNC Park is

0:55:03.719 --> 0:55:06.680
<v Speaker 1>always right at the top of the list. PNC Colorado,

0:55:07.160 --> 0:55:10.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, after Wriggling, Fenway, P and C Colorado and Camden,

0:55:10.640 --> 0:55:13.399
<v Speaker 1>those three are just fantastic.

0:55:14.000 --> 0:55:15.759
<v Speaker 2>Well we't even gone to the fact that we have

0:55:16.040 --> 0:55:17.280
<v Speaker 2>the best pitching.

0:55:18.000 --> 0:55:18.600
<v Speaker 3>He's so great.

0:55:18.680 --> 0:55:20.680
<v Speaker 2>I mean, Paul Skeens is unbelievable.

0:55:20.960 --> 0:55:22.840
<v Speaker 3>He's going to be terrific for the New York Yankees

0:55:22.880 --> 0:55:23.200
<v Speaker 3>one day.

0:55:23.560 --> 0:55:26.480
<v Speaker 2>And you know, it kills me to know that we

0:55:26.520 --> 0:55:28.120
<v Speaker 2>are probably not going to be able to keep this guy.

0:55:28.239 --> 0:55:31.920
<v Speaker 2>And you know, I look at from his perspective. You

0:55:31.960 --> 0:55:34.000
<v Speaker 2>want to win, and you want an ownership that wants

0:55:34.040 --> 0:55:35.360
<v Speaker 2>to win. I mean, we should be pitchers.

0:55:35.719 --> 0:55:36.000
<v Speaker 3>Do this.

0:55:36.680 --> 0:55:39.920
<v Speaker 1>What's your career lifespan? Right, Like you'll have a finite

0:55:39.960 --> 0:55:42.200
<v Speaker 1>amount of time before your arm falls off, you.

0:55:42.160 --> 0:55:44.560
<v Speaker 3>Know, I know, I know, I wish. Look, I want

0:55:44.600 --> 0:55:46.839
<v Speaker 3>to build a team around this guy. I want us

0:55:46.840 --> 0:55:47.759
<v Speaker 3>to compete and win.

0:55:48.200 --> 0:55:50.840
<v Speaker 2>I mean, we have this guy who's such a generational talent.

0:55:51.640 --> 0:55:53.520
<v Speaker 2>And I don't know, are the.

0:55:53.440 --> 0:55:56.360
<v Speaker 1>Pirates owners good community citizens? I mean, do they invest

0:55:56.400 --> 0:55:57.720
<v Speaker 1>in the community or not really.

0:55:58.280 --> 0:56:00.799
<v Speaker 2>I think if you went to a game, you would

0:56:00.840 --> 0:56:02.800
<v Speaker 2>see his banners and T shirts and tell them to

0:56:02.840 --> 0:56:05.000
<v Speaker 2>sell the team. And that tells you about what the

0:56:05.000 --> 0:56:07.239
<v Speaker 2>public sees. You know, Look, they want to winner. These

0:56:07.239 --> 0:56:10.200
<v Speaker 2>guys would would spend and invest. People would come around

0:56:10.840 --> 0:56:12.960
<v Speaker 2>this ownership. I think it's a simple lesson and you

0:56:13.040 --> 0:56:15.680
<v Speaker 2>see it with We're talked. We talked about the Rooneyes

0:56:15.680 --> 0:56:18.640
<v Speaker 2>and the Steelers. They invest, they spend a win, they

0:56:18.680 --> 0:56:21.120
<v Speaker 2>have a culture of winning. The Bucos could do this

0:56:21.200 --> 0:56:22.160
<v Speaker 2>with a little bit of money.

0:56:23.320 --> 0:56:24.160
<v Speaker 3>One last question.

0:56:24.200 --> 0:56:26.480
<v Speaker 1>If you go through the various suburban communities on a

0:56:26.480 --> 0:56:30.120
<v Speaker 1>college football Saturday, are there going to be more Penn

0:56:30.160 --> 0:56:33.120
<v Speaker 1>State flags or Pitt Panther flax?

0:56:33.400 --> 0:56:36.719
<v Speaker 2>Well, I'm a pit fan through and through, so we're

0:56:37.200 --> 0:56:38.000
<v Speaker 2>we're going with Pitt.

0:56:38.040 --> 0:56:40.879
<v Speaker 3>But there are pretty big fifty is it it? It's?

0:56:42.160 --> 0:56:44.480
<v Speaker 3>Is it? Well? And they're also West Virginia fans. We're

0:56:44.480 --> 0:56:46.360
<v Speaker 3>not that far from Morgantown, right, so you got a

0:56:46.360 --> 0:56:50.600
<v Speaker 3>little bit of that too. Yeah, it's a mix, all right. Congressman,

0:56:50.640 --> 0:56:52.359
<v Speaker 3>it's great to get to know you appreciate the time

0:56:52.560 --> 0:56:53.480
<v Speaker 3>Chuff Banks found me on