1 00:00:00,080 --> 00:00:03,600 Speaker 1: Judge Harvey Wilkinson, one of the nation's most eminent federal judges, 2 00:00:03,920 --> 00:00:07,440 Speaker 1: has a new memoir called All Falling Faiths, Reflections on 3 00:00:07,480 --> 00:00:11,080 Speaker 1: the promise and Failure of the nineteen sixties. Judge Wilkinson 4 00:00:11,080 --> 00:00:12,920 Speaker 1: has served on the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals in 5 00:00:13,000 --> 00:00:16,480 Speaker 1: Virginia since four when he was appointed by President Ronald Reagan. 6 00:00:17,079 --> 00:00:19,320 Speaker 1: Over the years, he's been mentioned many times as a 7 00:00:19,320 --> 00:00:21,560 Speaker 1: possible nominee to the Supreme Court, and he is also 8 00:00:21,640 --> 00:00:24,959 Speaker 1: a prolific writer of articles and books. His new book 9 00:00:25,000 --> 00:00:28,360 Speaker 1: looks at the impact of the nineteen sixties on American society. 10 00:00:28,880 --> 00:00:32,479 Speaker 1: Judge Wilkinson, welcome back to Bloomberg Law. That's a pleasure 11 00:00:32,479 --> 00:00:35,559 Speaker 1: to be with you. Tell us, Judge, why did you 12 00:00:35,600 --> 00:00:41,760 Speaker 1: write this book? Well, I thought I wasn't sure I 13 00:00:41,800 --> 00:00:43,520 Speaker 1: was going to write it. I thought I had left 14 00:00:43,520 --> 00:00:46,920 Speaker 1: the nineteen sixties behind. I thought it was in the 15 00:00:47,000 --> 00:00:50,360 Speaker 1: rear view mirra for a while. Uh, And then I 16 00:00:50,440 --> 00:00:55,120 Speaker 1: found it had only gone into remission. And the experiences 17 00:00:55,120 --> 00:00:58,600 Speaker 1: that the things that I've witnessed and the divisions that 18 00:00:58,640 --> 00:01:03,480 Speaker 1: I've watched over the past two years, um made me 19 00:01:03,520 --> 00:01:08,200 Speaker 1: realize that so much about the nineteen sixties is storming back, 20 00:01:08,920 --> 00:01:12,800 Speaker 1: and so I thought I would would, would would write 21 00:01:12,840 --> 00:01:18,440 Speaker 1: a memoir which would implore younger generations not to repeat 22 00:01:18,520 --> 00:01:22,840 Speaker 1: the experience that we have had, and also would urge 23 00:01:22,920 --> 00:01:27,039 Speaker 1: my own generation, where we did so much in our 24 00:01:27,080 --> 00:01:31,280 Speaker 1: younger years to drive America part to spend our later 25 00:01:31,400 --> 00:01:35,320 Speaker 1: years trying to heal and maybe if it is all possible, 26 00:01:35,760 --> 00:01:40,119 Speaker 1: to bring this wonderful country back together. And I wanted 27 00:01:40,160 --> 00:01:43,000 Speaker 1: to do it in a memoir because it's been so 28 00:01:43,200 --> 00:01:47,040 Speaker 1: much shouting about the nineteen sixties and so much screaming, 29 00:01:47,600 --> 00:01:51,160 Speaker 1: and so many people heading for the barricades, and I thought, 30 00:01:51,280 --> 00:01:53,200 Speaker 1: maybe this is a little we need to have a 31 00:01:53,200 --> 00:01:57,760 Speaker 1: little bit different approach, hand in hand approach which just 32 00:01:58,360 --> 00:02:03,360 Speaker 1: indicates it was like to live through those years, um, 33 00:02:03,400 --> 00:02:07,880 Speaker 1: the good and the bad, and basically why we don't 34 00:02:07,880 --> 00:02:11,360 Speaker 1: want to repeat them. Judge Wilkinson, you're write about the 35 00:02:11,400 --> 00:02:15,160 Speaker 1: wreckage of the nineteen sixties having an imprint on what's 36 00:02:15,200 --> 00:02:18,920 Speaker 1: happening today. Explain what you mean by the wreckage and 37 00:02:19,000 --> 00:02:26,600 Speaker 1: the lasting effect it's had. Well it in so many ways, Um, 38 00:02:27,160 --> 00:02:30,440 Speaker 1: Just to begin, the big part of the wreckage was 39 00:02:30,480 --> 00:02:35,120 Speaker 1: the harm done to the spirit of tolerance in higher education, 40 00:02:35,360 --> 00:02:40,280 Speaker 1: and the sixties pioneered such techniques which I wish it, 41 00:02:40,440 --> 00:02:45,200 Speaker 1: which I witnessed firsthand, sitting in an administration buildings and 42 00:02:45,240 --> 00:02:50,240 Speaker 1: grabbing microphones from speakers and shouting down speakers and roughing 43 00:02:50,360 --> 00:02:56,720 Speaker 1: up speakers, um and it was like people had had 44 00:02:56,760 --> 00:03:04,960 Speaker 1: stopped listening. And there was a a negativity to imparted 45 00:03:05,560 --> 00:03:10,080 Speaker 1: in the nineteen sixties about everything about America. There was 46 00:03:10,160 --> 00:03:14,080 Speaker 1: a negative attitude taken to the to the private sector 47 00:03:14,240 --> 00:03:18,079 Speaker 1: in some of the history courses I took, and it 48 00:03:18,240 --> 00:03:22,960 Speaker 1: was a negative attitude taken toward American history which was 49 00:03:23,040 --> 00:03:29,040 Speaker 1: just portrayed. Sometimes there's one long saga of oppression. And 50 00:03:29,080 --> 00:03:31,640 Speaker 1: this is not a perfect country by any means. The 51 00:03:31,720 --> 00:03:38,160 Speaker 1: private sector isn't perfect. We've had shameful chapters of segregation 52 00:03:38,280 --> 00:03:42,080 Speaker 1: and slavery. But there's so much good about this country 53 00:03:42,520 --> 00:03:47,040 Speaker 1: and it was overlooked at in in a significant part 54 00:03:47,720 --> 00:03:53,360 Speaker 1: during the nineteen sixties, and there the the good side 55 00:03:53,360 --> 00:03:58,320 Speaker 1: of the American story wasn't told. And uh, there's only 56 00:03:59,760 --> 00:04:03,560 Speaker 1: so much negativity toward a country that that it that 57 00:04:03,680 --> 00:04:09,240 Speaker 1: it can endure, and that's only part of the damage. Judge, 58 00:04:09,720 --> 00:04:13,160 Speaker 1: during the in one of your chapters, you about law 59 00:04:13,800 --> 00:04:17,400 Speaker 1: you call the sixties and a a period of quote lawlessness 60 00:04:17,440 --> 00:04:19,640 Speaker 1: writ large? What did what did you mean by that? 61 00:04:20,279 --> 00:04:23,040 Speaker 1: Because people were taking the law into their own hands. 62 00:04:23,120 --> 00:04:30,560 Speaker 1: It saddened me. Um. The assassinations, of course, were the 63 00:04:30,600 --> 00:04:34,599 Speaker 1: most horrible example of it. Of I still remember what 64 00:04:34,720 --> 00:04:39,560 Speaker 1: I was doing each night on the Kennedy John Kennedy's assassination, 65 00:04:39,720 --> 00:04:45,080 Speaker 1: Robert Kennedy's assassination, Martin Luther King's assassination by people who 66 00:04:45,200 --> 00:04:49,080 Speaker 1: thought that their vision of the right was more important 67 00:04:49,120 --> 00:04:52,560 Speaker 1: than the law. And then there were a series of 68 00:04:53,320 --> 00:04:57,679 Speaker 1: riots and Watts and Rochester and and Harlem and Newark 69 00:04:57,720 --> 00:05:02,560 Speaker 1: and Detroit, which in which great damage was inflicted on 70 00:05:03,200 --> 00:05:06,960 Speaker 1: the livelihood of shopkeepers and on motors. And then there 71 00:05:07,000 --> 00:05:11,279 Speaker 1: were police departments who were charged with enforcing the law. 72 00:05:11,800 --> 00:05:15,400 Speaker 1: And in Birmingham with Bull Connor and his his his 73 00:05:15,600 --> 00:05:19,320 Speaker 1: police dogs, and in Chicago at the nineteen sixty eight 74 00:05:19,400 --> 00:05:23,600 Speaker 1: Democratic Convention, and at Stonewall in New York. Judge Wilkinson, 75 00:05:23,760 --> 00:05:26,880 Speaker 1: you were appointed by Republican Ronald Reagan. You are known 76 00:05:26,920 --> 00:05:30,919 Speaker 1: generally as a conservative judge, for whatever that means. And 77 00:05:31,760 --> 00:05:34,200 Speaker 1: you but in the book you talk about some of 78 00:05:34,200 --> 00:05:36,400 Speaker 1: the assassinations we were talking about earlier in the show 79 00:05:36,480 --> 00:05:38,880 Speaker 1: during the nineteen sixties, including that of Robert Kennedy, and 80 00:05:38,880 --> 00:05:41,040 Speaker 1: in writing about Kennedy, it seemed to me you were 81 00:05:41,040 --> 00:05:44,599 Speaker 1: fairly admiring. Yet he's an icon of the left these days. 82 00:05:44,640 --> 00:05:47,360 Speaker 1: You know, liberals tend to idolize him. What does Robert 83 00:05:47,440 --> 00:05:53,640 Speaker 1: Kennedy mean to you? Well, you know, he represented hope 84 00:05:53,640 --> 00:05:58,880 Speaker 1: to me. Uh. First of all, Um, he simply along 85 00:05:58,920 --> 00:06:04,719 Speaker 1: with with with John Kennedy and King Uh, they represented 86 00:06:04,800 --> 00:06:09,080 Speaker 1: hope in this country. And I think they rejected the 87 00:06:09,200 --> 00:06:13,640 Speaker 1: neilism of the of the nineteen sixties, UM, because they 88 00:06:13,680 --> 00:06:16,760 Speaker 1: were great believers in America. And that's what made their 89 00:06:16,800 --> 00:06:21,720 Speaker 1: death so immensely sad. And when Robert Kennedy, he went 90 00:06:21,760 --> 00:06:26,000 Speaker 1: to Appalachia, he went to he went to the Delta UM, 91 00:06:26,320 --> 00:06:28,720 Speaker 1: he went to the ghettos, he went to the Indian 92 00:06:28,760 --> 00:06:34,880 Speaker 1: Reservations UM. And his message was, look, don't give up 93 00:06:34,880 --> 00:06:42,159 Speaker 1: on this country. And that's why UM, I admired him 94 00:06:42,200 --> 00:06:46,760 Speaker 1: so because he he could see the need for reforms, 95 00:06:47,240 --> 00:06:50,359 Speaker 1: but he also saw the good side of America. And 96 00:06:50,400 --> 00:06:54,440 Speaker 1: that's what I'm trying to convey in and in in 97 00:06:54,480 --> 00:06:56,560 Speaker 1: this part of what I'm trying to convey in this 98 00:06:57,120 --> 00:07:01,800 Speaker 1: uh memoir myself is that we're not a We're not 99 00:07:01,839 --> 00:07:07,560 Speaker 1: a sainted nation, but we're neither are we a sinning nation? Um, 100 00:07:07,680 --> 00:07:10,920 Speaker 1: we are. In Robert Kennedy's life, I think helped to 101 00:07:11,000 --> 00:07:15,560 Speaker 1: represent this. We are a nation that's tried. And whatever 102 00:07:15,600 --> 00:07:18,440 Speaker 1: else you can say about the United States, and you 103 00:07:18,480 --> 00:07:21,559 Speaker 1: may you may seek to criticize it, and that's fine. 104 00:07:21,600 --> 00:07:24,080 Speaker 1: You may seek to praise it, and that's fine too. 105 00:07:24,560 --> 00:07:28,080 Speaker 1: But what Robert Kennedy saw is America will never give 106 00:07:28,160 --> 00:07:31,760 Speaker 1: up on itself. Um. He was a man who tried, 107 00:07:32,160 --> 00:07:34,960 Speaker 1: and this country is a nation that has tried. We've 108 00:07:35,000 --> 00:07:37,800 Speaker 1: tried to get it right. You can't reach utopia in 109 00:07:37,840 --> 00:07:41,120 Speaker 1: a day, but dog gone, this wonderful country of ours 110 00:07:41,200 --> 00:07:47,040 Speaker 1: has tried. Judge. We're divided now into Red America and 111 00:07:47,080 --> 00:07:51,200 Speaker 1: Blue America more and more. Are there lessons from the 112 00:07:51,280 --> 00:07:56,760 Speaker 1: sixties that could change that in the future, Well, I 113 00:07:56,880 --> 00:08:03,200 Speaker 1: think so because the um what the sixties told is 114 00:08:03,280 --> 00:08:07,720 Speaker 1: that we we have these class divisions that were sewn in, 115 00:08:07,960 --> 00:08:11,640 Speaker 1: and we had many other kinds of differences that were 116 00:08:11,680 --> 00:08:16,280 Speaker 1: sewn in. But we have to go um at at 117 00:08:17,240 --> 00:08:23,560 Speaker 1: at this together. And one of the things that I'm 118 00:08:23,600 --> 00:08:28,160 Speaker 1: trying to do is at the end of this memoir, UM, 119 00:08:28,280 --> 00:08:31,480 Speaker 1: I will hope that we will overcome, that we can 120 00:08:31,520 --> 00:08:35,559 Speaker 1: try to overcome the great divisions of the nineties sixties, 121 00:08:35,600 --> 00:08:39,720 Speaker 1: because the sixties teaches us, really that there's almost only 122 00:08:39,840 --> 00:08:44,640 Speaker 1: so much of this recurring rancor and bitterness that even 123 00:08:44,640 --> 00:08:47,640 Speaker 1: the most beautiful and wonderful country, as well as he is, 124 00:08:48,280 --> 00:08:53,360 Speaker 1: UM can sustain. And I'm hopeful and in my memoir 125 00:08:53,480 --> 00:08:55,480 Speaker 1: that at the end of it, whether you love the 126 00:08:55,520 --> 00:08:59,720 Speaker 1: sixties or you dislike the sixties intensely, UM, that you 127 00:09:00,160 --> 00:09:04,000 Speaker 1: we will be able to appreciate as Americans the other 128 00:09:04,040 --> 00:09:08,520 Speaker 1: side of the sixties argument, because the sixties showed us 129 00:09:09,160 --> 00:09:13,000 Speaker 1: just how damaging division can be to society, and anyone 130 00:09:13,080 --> 00:09:16,959 Speaker 1: that lives through it knows the scars and the wounds 131 00:09:16,960 --> 00:09:22,800 Speaker 1: that a decade like that inflicted. And it teaches really 132 00:09:23,679 --> 00:09:26,400 Speaker 1: the need to understand each other, to listen to each other, 133 00:09:26,520 --> 00:09:29,960 Speaker 1: to try to heal, because we can't go on the 134 00:09:30,000 --> 00:09:32,760 Speaker 1: way we're doing well. You know, Judge, a lot of 135 00:09:32,760 --> 00:09:35,640 Speaker 1: people would say that the way you have to persuade 136 00:09:35,640 --> 00:09:38,280 Speaker 1: people to see how you feel is through protests. And 137 00:09:38,320 --> 00:09:40,760 Speaker 1: you write a fair amount in the book about protests 138 00:09:40,760 --> 00:09:43,160 Speaker 1: in the sixties, and in fact, you right that the 139 00:09:43,200 --> 00:09:46,000 Speaker 1: civil rights movement, which was non violent, was uplifting, but 140 00:09:46,120 --> 00:09:49,240 Speaker 1: that you feel that many miscalculated and thought that law 141 00:09:49,280 --> 00:09:53,240 Speaker 1: breaking could be limited to good causes and UM, So 142 00:09:53,360 --> 00:09:56,000 Speaker 1: what what's your view of what went wrong with protest 143 00:09:56,080 --> 00:10:00,520 Speaker 1: in the nineteen sixties. Well, something changed in the middle 144 00:10:00,520 --> 00:10:05,280 Speaker 1: of the decade, and UM, UM, because in nineteen sixty 145 00:10:05,280 --> 00:10:08,199 Speaker 1: three you had that great March on Washington, and then 146 00:10:08,280 --> 00:10:14,000 Speaker 1: you had that wonderful march from Selma to Montgomery UM 147 00:10:14,200 --> 00:10:17,840 Speaker 1: in nineteen sixty five, and it led to the passage 148 00:10:17,880 --> 00:10:21,240 Speaker 1: of the UH, the Great Civil Rights Act. But then 149 00:10:21,280 --> 00:10:26,559 Speaker 1: you asked what changed? And for some reason, UM, the 150 00:10:26,840 --> 00:10:33,240 Speaker 1: very successful tactics of UM nonviolent resistance and non violence 151 00:10:33,320 --> 00:10:38,800 Speaker 1: that Martin Luther King had pioneered. UM, the movement kept 152 00:10:39,200 --> 00:10:44,079 Speaker 1: moving left. In the situations that were Black power, for example, 153 00:10:44,880 --> 00:10:49,520 Speaker 1: was a different kind of UM operation in the Southern 154 00:10:49,600 --> 00:10:53,480 Speaker 1: Christian Leadership Conference. So that was was one thing that changed. 155 00:10:53,480 --> 00:10:57,439 Speaker 1: But I think the major thing that changed was UM. 156 00:10:57,960 --> 00:11:02,400 Speaker 1: The Vietnam War and when it came along UH, particularly 157 00:11:02,440 --> 00:11:04,920 Speaker 1: as it heated up in the latter part of the decade, 158 00:11:05,559 --> 00:11:10,000 Speaker 1: it inculcated UM so much bitterness and so much distrust 159 00:11:10,679 --> 00:11:15,000 Speaker 1: on the part of citizens to their government that that 160 00:11:15,320 --> 00:11:20,840 Speaker 1: it just put everything in into a more violent temper 161 00:11:21,200 --> 00:11:24,160 Speaker 1: and more violent frame of mind. And law was a 162 00:11:24,240 --> 00:11:29,520 Speaker 1: casualty of that. But Vietnam was a a dreadful miscalculation, 163 00:11:29,600 --> 00:11:32,520 Speaker 1: and along with some other with some other things, that 164 00:11:33,160 --> 00:11:36,560 Speaker 1: it changed the whole tone and tenor of the decade 165 00:11:36,600 --> 00:11:39,360 Speaker 1: to where the last five years of it we're far 166 00:11:39,480 --> 00:11:42,560 Speaker 1: more acrimonious than the way it it's in the way 167 00:11:42,600 --> 00:11:45,280 Speaker 1: it started out, because the early days of the civil 168 00:11:45,360 --> 00:11:50,520 Speaker 1: rights movement in particular, we're quite moving and lyrical, um 169 00:11:50,600 --> 00:11:54,680 Speaker 1: in in every way, and then along came Vietnam. I 170 00:11:54,720 --> 00:11:57,880 Speaker 1: want to turn for a second to your writing itself. 171 00:11:58,000 --> 00:12:01,679 Speaker 1: Judge how different is it to write a book like this, 172 00:12:01,760 --> 00:12:06,000 Speaker 1: which is so personal, compared to writing a legal opinion 173 00:12:06,080 --> 00:12:10,960 Speaker 1: which you have a flair for well legal opinion. UM. 174 00:12:11,600 --> 00:12:14,160 Speaker 1: I love the discipline of legal writing, and I think 175 00:12:14,200 --> 00:12:18,120 Speaker 1: that that contributes to the beauty of it. UM. It's 176 00:12:18,160 --> 00:12:21,880 Speaker 1: always good to work within within forms and frameworks, but 177 00:12:21,960 --> 00:12:24,320 Speaker 1: at the end of the day, sometimes and and and 178 00:12:24,520 --> 00:12:28,920 Speaker 1: on weekends, I just feel a need to sort of 179 00:12:29,280 --> 00:12:34,400 Speaker 1: UM run over open land without those constraints. And as 180 00:12:34,480 --> 00:12:36,679 Speaker 1: much as I love my colleagues on the court and 181 00:12:36,720 --> 00:12:41,920 Speaker 1: they're wonderful people and I do UM sometimes it's it's 182 00:12:42,640 --> 00:12:45,160 Speaker 1: it's fun to write in a way that you can 183 00:12:45,240 --> 00:12:48,240 Speaker 1: just um air it out and say what you believe 184 00:12:48,320 --> 00:12:50,880 Speaker 1: without the need to convince one or two other very 185 00:12:50,880 --> 00:12:55,160 Speaker 1: fine judges that you're not completely crazy. So these are 186 00:12:55,200 --> 00:12:57,840 Speaker 1: just two very different forms of writing. I love both 187 00:12:57,880 --> 00:13:01,760 Speaker 1: of them, but uh, one of arms one one gives 188 00:13:01,760 --> 00:13:06,439 Speaker 1: you a greater freedom, uh, the other has more more constraints. 189 00:13:06,880 --> 00:13:10,520 Speaker 1: They're both very necessary. Um. I love both forms of them, 190 00:13:10,559 --> 00:13:13,320 Speaker 1: but I just I need to vary between the two. 191 00:13:13,400 --> 00:13:17,720 Speaker 1: I just can't do one exclusively. Well. In in doing 192 00:13:17,720 --> 00:13:19,720 Speaker 1: this writing which is in and it is an easy 193 00:13:19,720 --> 00:13:23,040 Speaker 1: book to read, I must say the the one of 194 00:13:23,040 --> 00:13:25,880 Speaker 1: the things you talk about is that you know, sort 195 00:13:25,880 --> 00:13:29,280 Speaker 1: of latter day terrorists and others who seek to inflict 196 00:13:29,360 --> 00:13:32,160 Speaker 1: harm around the globe are sort of the inheritors of 197 00:13:32,200 --> 00:13:34,160 Speaker 1: some of the mistakes you see in the nineteen sixties. 198 00:13:34,320 --> 00:13:37,600 Speaker 1: Why did what made you say that? Well, again, it 199 00:13:37,679 --> 00:13:40,560 Speaker 1: comes back to this whole view that if you think 200 00:13:40,679 --> 00:13:45,240 Speaker 1: your view of your utopia and your own view um 201 00:13:45,720 --> 00:13:50,280 Speaker 1: is right and indisputably right, so that nobody else's view 202 00:13:50,320 --> 00:13:55,040 Speaker 1: really matters. UM, you get to the point of just 203 00:13:56,120 --> 00:13:59,280 Speaker 1: taking law into your own hands and you put yourself 204 00:13:59,320 --> 00:14:02,800 Speaker 1: above the law, and that if you then when that 205 00:14:02,880 --> 00:14:06,160 Speaker 1: starts to happen, then then civilization is we've known it 206 00:14:06,880 --> 00:14:11,199 Speaker 1: UM is impaired. And the thing that makes it so 207 00:14:11,280 --> 00:14:15,720 Speaker 1: much more dangerous is that the amplification uh that that 208 00:14:16,440 --> 00:14:19,840 Speaker 1: people who take law into their own hands, they enjoy 209 00:14:19,920 --> 00:14:26,400 Speaker 1: the amplification sometimes of social media, and the the weapons 210 00:14:26,440 --> 00:14:29,200 Speaker 1: of destruction are so much more lethal than they were 211 00:14:29,920 --> 00:14:34,160 Speaker 1: UM during the nineteen sixties, so small minorities of terrorists 212 00:14:34,200 --> 00:14:39,040 Speaker 1: in everything who inherit the idea that that law is 213 00:14:39,120 --> 00:14:42,920 Speaker 1: if any one person, how anyone person wants to define it. 214 00:14:43,640 --> 00:14:46,760 Speaker 1: That was bad in the sixties. But the dangerous thing 215 00:14:46,880 --> 00:14:50,320 Speaker 1: is that when the theory of law breaking carried forward 216 00:14:50,360 --> 00:14:54,520 Speaker 1: into our present day, the means of destruction and the 217 00:14:54,600 --> 00:14:57,800 Speaker 1: means of amplification have made it more of a threat 218 00:14:58,120 --> 00:15:01,280 Speaker 1: and have made it more you though, and this is 219 00:15:01,320 --> 00:15:04,640 Speaker 1: one of I think the very unhappy legacies that the 220 00:15:04,720 --> 00:15:08,800 Speaker 1: nineteen sixties have left America. Well our thanks to Judge 221 00:15:08,800 --> 00:15:12,000 Speaker 1: Harvey Wilkinson, whose book All falling Faith's reflection on the 222 00:15:12,040 --> 00:15:14,040 Speaker 1: promise and the failure of the nineteen sixties is a 223 00:15:14,080 --> 00:15:17,360 Speaker 1: fascinating read. We appreciate your being here on Bloomberg Law