WEBVTT - Bloomberg Surveillance TV: April 24th, 2026

0:00:00.040 --> 0:00:06.720
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News.

0:00:11.640 --> 0:00:15.440
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Jonathan Ferrow, along

0:00:15.480 --> 0:00:18.680
<v Speaker 2>with Lisa Bromwitz and Amrie Hordern. Join us each day

0:00:18.720 --> 0:00:22.280
<v Speaker 2>for insight from the best in markets, economics, and geopolitics

0:00:22.400 --> 0:00:24.840
<v Speaker 2>from our global headquarters in New York City. We are

0:00:24.920 --> 0:00:27.680
<v Speaker 2>live on Bloomberg Television weekday mornings from six to nine

0:00:27.720 --> 0:00:31.280
<v Speaker 2>am Eastern. Subscribe to the podcast on Apple, Spotify or

0:00:31.320 --> 0:00:33.919
<v Speaker 2>anywhere else you listen, and as always on the Bloomberg

0:00:34.000 --> 0:00:37.000
<v Speaker 2>Terminal and the Bloomberg Business app. We begin this out

0:00:37.000 --> 0:00:39.680
<v Speaker 2>with tech earnings helping to offset cycnical threats building the

0:00:39.760 --> 0:00:42.800
<v Speaker 2>energy market as US around tensions continue to simm up.

0:00:42.960 --> 0:00:45.839
<v Speaker 2>Bitter chairb Academy securities right in. My best case is

0:00:45.840 --> 0:00:48.479
<v Speaker 2>that the chatter from last week of an impending and

0:00:48.600 --> 0:00:51.360
<v Speaker 2>very strong deal for the US comes to fruition. Pete

0:00:51.400 --> 0:00:53.479
<v Speaker 2>joins us now for more. Pete and Monic Warrick. That's

0:00:53.479 --> 0:00:55.000
<v Speaker 2>your best case. What's your base case?

0:00:55.840 --> 0:00:56.360
<v Speaker 1>Bias case?

0:00:56.400 --> 0:00:58.400
<v Speaker 3>I think is that this continues to struggle and it

0:00:58.400 --> 0:01:00.160
<v Speaker 3>starts weighing a little bit more on the economy. You

0:01:00.160 --> 0:01:02.080
<v Speaker 3>just pointed out We've been looking longer day to futures

0:01:02.120 --> 0:01:05.400
<v Speaker 3>contracts and you're out to eighty dollars in WTI out

0:01:05.440 --> 0:01:08.240
<v Speaker 3>to November now, so that's different, and you're starting in

0:01:08.280 --> 0:01:11.120
<v Speaker 3>those longer months September, October, November, you're actually at the

0:01:11.160 --> 0:01:14.080
<v Speaker 3>highs of the whole cycle. So unlike the front contract,

0:01:14.080 --> 0:01:16.600
<v Speaker 3>which we're still below kind of those spikes, we're seeing

0:01:16.600 --> 0:01:18.920
<v Speaker 3>this kind of push out and it's really hard to

0:01:18.920 --> 0:01:20.960
<v Speaker 3>figure out who's in charge in Iran. So I think

0:01:21.000 --> 0:01:23.480
<v Speaker 3>that's a big issue, and it's really figure out who's

0:01:23.480 --> 0:01:25.200
<v Speaker 3>willing to make that first move. I think when we

0:01:25.200 --> 0:01:28.760
<v Speaker 3>talk to our Geopolitical intelligence group, the consensus view is

0:01:28.800 --> 0:01:31.280
<v Speaker 3>that we will probably to end this war, have to

0:01:31.400 --> 0:01:33.720
<v Speaker 3>escalate once more. To actually win that we will have

0:01:33.760 --> 0:01:35.560
<v Speaker 3>to go in that, we will have to fight, and

0:01:35.600 --> 0:01:38.559
<v Speaker 3>we will have to put pressure on Iran. Trump sometime's

0:01:38.600 --> 0:01:40.839
<v Speaker 3>reluctant to do that right now, but we don't really

0:01:40.840 --> 0:01:42.320
<v Speaker 3>see winning any other way right now.

0:01:42.440 --> 0:01:44.280
<v Speaker 2>Right now, we're not tried in the economy. We're tried

0:01:44.319 --> 0:01:46.880
<v Speaker 2>in the market, and there's slightly different things. The economy

0:01:46.959 --> 0:01:49.000
<v Speaker 2>is not great in Asia, in Europe, there's a real threat.

0:01:49.040 --> 0:01:51.760
<v Speaker 2>In the US, things are okay, but they're better than good.

0:01:52.080 --> 0:01:53.760
<v Speaker 2>If you look at a US tech story and the

0:01:53.800 --> 0:01:56.320
<v Speaker 2>earnings profile of some of the chip makers at the moment,

0:01:56.400 --> 0:01:58.320
<v Speaker 2>what's your best bet in the market, how are you

0:01:58.360 --> 0:02:00.960
<v Speaker 2>allocating capital? What are about have to full well?

0:02:00.960 --> 0:02:03.040
<v Speaker 3>As you know, we've been talking about this production for security,

0:02:03.080 --> 0:02:04.840
<v Speaker 3>so we love that. And Intel was actually one of

0:02:04.840 --> 0:02:06.400
<v Speaker 3>our names we've expect because we did think that the

0:02:06.480 --> 0:02:09.799
<v Speaker 3>US had to grow chip business organically, domestically. I think

0:02:09.840 --> 0:02:12.480
<v Speaker 3>now that's almost I've got to admit I started selling

0:02:12.480 --> 0:02:13.920
<v Speaker 3>a little bit a header earning as I'm probably going

0:02:13.919 --> 0:02:15.480
<v Speaker 3>to be closed a bit more. It's better lucky than

0:02:15.520 --> 0:02:17.959
<v Speaker 3>smart sometimes, but you know, we've had that great play.

0:02:18.120 --> 0:02:19.960
<v Speaker 3>I think you have to start really looking tune out

0:02:19.960 --> 0:02:22.120
<v Speaker 3>of Europe and thinking that Europe is finally going to

0:02:22.120 --> 0:02:25.120
<v Speaker 3>get the joke that you have to invest in heavy industry.

0:02:25.320 --> 0:02:27.920
<v Speaker 3>You have to invest in your own electricity production. You

0:02:28.000 --> 0:02:31.079
<v Speaker 3>have to let BP, Shell Totel do what they're good

0:02:31.080 --> 0:02:33.560
<v Speaker 3>at and not so worry. You know, don't worry as

0:02:33.600 --> 0:02:37.200
<v Speaker 3>much about carbon in one degree temperature change is five

0:02:37.280 --> 0:02:39.760
<v Speaker 3>years from now, when the reality is you need electricity,

0:02:39.840 --> 0:02:42.520
<v Speaker 3>need energy. I think they start unleashing some of this.

0:02:42.720 --> 0:02:44.480
<v Speaker 3>They're getting a little bit more creative. I think they're

0:02:44.480 --> 0:02:46.760
<v Speaker 3>getting a little bit more organized, partly because they're getting

0:02:46.760 --> 0:02:48.359
<v Speaker 3>a little bit more desperate. You know, it kind of

0:02:48.360 --> 0:02:50.200
<v Speaker 3>takes them years to figure anything out. They got kicked

0:02:50.200 --> 0:02:52.600
<v Speaker 3>by Russia. Now they're getting kicked by iron. I think

0:02:52.639 --> 0:02:54.400
<v Speaker 3>that's going to be really interesting. So I want to

0:02:54.440 --> 0:02:56.640
<v Speaker 3>own the energy plays. I want to own kind of

0:02:56.639 --> 0:02:59.000
<v Speaker 3>that production for security, not just now in the US,

0:02:59.040 --> 0:03:00.000
<v Speaker 3>but really heavily into US.

0:03:00.320 --> 0:03:02.079
<v Speaker 2>They so we mentioned it briefly. You see the pressure

0:03:02.080 --> 0:03:04.400
<v Speaker 2>on the Europeans and the economy in the PMI data.

0:03:04.560 --> 0:03:05.799
<v Speaker 2>You see it in the markets too. I think the

0:03:05.840 --> 0:03:08.000
<v Speaker 2>euro stocks fifty so far this week is down some

0:03:08.120 --> 0:03:08.680
<v Speaker 2>three percent.

0:03:08.840 --> 0:03:10.560
<v Speaker 4>They are hit in both ways.

0:03:10.639 --> 0:03:12.600
<v Speaker 5>Number one, their energy importers, but they also don't have

0:03:12.600 --> 0:03:14.400
<v Speaker 5>the techt story, And the tech story seems to be

0:03:14.440 --> 0:03:17.119
<v Speaker 5>supporting the market in two ways. On one hand, you've got,

0:03:17.160 --> 0:03:20.079
<v Speaker 5>of course, just the idea that there's upside surprise and

0:03:20.080 --> 0:03:22.760
<v Speaker 5>the equities, but also the investment the capex, which seems

0:03:22.760 --> 0:03:24.600
<v Speaker 5>to be supporting the picks and shovels that we see

0:03:24.680 --> 0:03:27.120
<v Speaker 5>with the semiconductors and the energy stocks in the US.

0:03:27.320 --> 0:03:30.400
<v Speaker 5>And that's been a huge support because that is existential spending.

0:03:30.520 --> 0:03:34.120
<v Speaker 5>It isn't necessarily something that's coming from an obvious use case.

0:03:34.160 --> 0:03:36.680
<v Speaker 2>It takes us the next week. So next week, next Wednesday,

0:03:36.840 --> 0:03:40.640
<v Speaker 2>we get some big earnings from Microsoft, from Meta, from Alphabet.

0:03:40.960 --> 0:03:43.160
<v Speaker 2>They are the big spenders, and some of them are

0:03:43.200 --> 0:03:46.080
<v Speaker 2>also cunning jobs to support that spending. To Lisa's point,

0:03:46.120 --> 0:03:48.440
<v Speaker 2>when they feel like it's existential and they've got the

0:03:48.440 --> 0:03:50.800
<v Speaker 2>balance sheet to carry on spending at least trades, you

0:03:50.840 --> 0:03:52.240
<v Speaker 2>want to be on the wrong side of to get

0:03:52.240 --> 0:03:52.960
<v Speaker 2>on the other side of.

0:03:53.080 --> 0:03:54.640
<v Speaker 3>At the moment, I think we're all kind of waiting

0:03:54.640 --> 0:03:57.000
<v Speaker 3>to see if software can really turn around. So the

0:03:57.040 --> 0:03:59.040
<v Speaker 3>Microsoft story, I think will be really interesting, right can

0:03:59.040 --> 0:04:02.040
<v Speaker 3>we get this turnaround software? And you know I'm him tempted.

0:04:02.040 --> 0:04:03.480
<v Speaker 3>I don't think I'll get to the point this weekend,

0:04:03.520 --> 0:04:05.160
<v Speaker 3>but I want to write the note, like you know,

0:04:05.520 --> 0:04:08.720
<v Speaker 3>your costs or someone else's customers. And I'm getting a

0:04:08.720 --> 0:04:10.800
<v Speaker 3>little bit worried about the job situation. Right we kind

0:04:10.800 --> 0:04:13.720
<v Speaker 3>of have this working poor situation. We have affordability that's

0:04:13.920 --> 0:04:15.840
<v Speaker 3>doing nothing but getting worse right now, and I know

0:04:15.880 --> 0:04:17.599
<v Speaker 3>we kind of focus so much at gas.

0:04:17.480 --> 0:04:17.960
<v Speaker 1>At the pump.

0:04:18.120 --> 0:04:20.040
<v Speaker 3>I'm getting increasingly worried about what's going to happen to

0:04:20.080 --> 0:04:22.159
<v Speaker 3>fuel costs? Right, Diesel is such a big component of

0:04:22.160 --> 0:04:24.680
<v Speaker 3>fuel costs. We haven't even started feeling the impact of

0:04:24.720 --> 0:04:27.839
<v Speaker 3>higher fertilizer prices on food costs. I feel this affordability

0:04:27.839 --> 0:04:29.920
<v Speaker 3>like this working poor and people who are not able

0:04:29.920 --> 0:04:32.719
<v Speaker 3>to make ends meet the way they thought. That income

0:04:32.760 --> 0:04:35.120
<v Speaker 3>line keeps creeping higher and higher. Now you're starting to

0:04:35.200 --> 0:04:37.279
<v Speaker 3>lay off some people, you know, very nice jobs in

0:04:37.320 --> 0:04:39.400
<v Speaker 3>many of these cases. I'm a little bit worried that

0:04:39.440 --> 0:04:42.480
<v Speaker 3>there is a subtext of this economy that's worse and

0:04:42.520 --> 0:04:44.360
<v Speaker 3>that the one thing we're not I'm still trying to

0:04:44.360 --> 0:04:46.719
<v Speaker 3>figure out how to pick this up myself, but I

0:04:46.760 --> 0:04:49.200
<v Speaker 3>feel like we are very good at identifying job loss

0:04:49.320 --> 0:04:51.279
<v Speaker 3>lead recessions. Right we see the job loss, we start

0:04:51.279 --> 0:04:53.279
<v Speaker 3>figuring out we know how to deal with that. I'm

0:04:53.279 --> 0:04:56.440
<v Speaker 3>not sure we've had an affordability led recession, And despite

0:04:56.480 --> 0:04:58.119
<v Speaker 3>the fact that chips and things are doing so well,

0:04:58.240 --> 0:05:01.000
<v Speaker 3>I'm increasingly worried that you're seeing pressure on the consumer

0:05:01.120 --> 0:05:03.320
<v Speaker 3>ways their make hands meet, their make hands meat.

0:05:03.320 --> 0:05:04.320
<v Speaker 1>We got the bump from you know.

0:05:04.279 --> 0:05:06.960
<v Speaker 3>The tax relief and things, where are they two months

0:05:07.000 --> 0:05:07.360
<v Speaker 3>from now?

0:05:07.440 --> 0:05:09.039
<v Speaker 5>So a lot of people will be nodding along and

0:05:09.040 --> 0:05:10.440
<v Speaker 5>they'll be saying, we see this in the data, we

0:05:10.480 --> 0:05:12.520
<v Speaker 5>see this in the sentiment that we have, of course

0:05:12.560 --> 0:05:16.080
<v Speaker 5>coming out through all the surveys that indicate this fear

0:05:16.120 --> 0:05:17.160
<v Speaker 5>about affordability.

0:05:17.680 --> 0:05:19.160
<v Speaker 1>But then stocks.

0:05:18.800 --> 0:05:21.000
<v Speaker 5>Get rewarded for cutting staff and saying that they're going

0:05:21.040 --> 0:05:22.320
<v Speaker 5>to invest in AI instead.

0:05:22.920 --> 0:05:23.640
<v Speaker 4>How awkward is that?

0:05:23.640 --> 0:05:25.080
<v Speaker 5>I mean, do you think that that's going to be

0:05:25.240 --> 0:05:28.440
<v Speaker 5>the theme going forward? That if companies cut a staff

0:05:28.480 --> 0:05:30.960
<v Speaker 5>wholesale and say we're going to invest in AI. That's

0:05:31.000 --> 0:05:32.159
<v Speaker 5>a by the stock moment.

0:05:32.640 --> 0:05:34.640
<v Speaker 3>I think at some point people start getting worried about

0:05:34.640 --> 0:05:38.080
<v Speaker 3>the job losses, and not at that individual company level,

0:05:38.080 --> 0:05:40.279
<v Speaker 3>but at the national level, and say where are we

0:05:40.360 --> 0:05:41.840
<v Speaker 3>And you know it was just what two months ago

0:05:41.920 --> 0:05:43.480
<v Speaker 3>we were going to have the AI took over all

0:05:43.480 --> 0:05:45.920
<v Speaker 3>the jobs, and that kind of narrative disappeared.

0:05:46.240 --> 0:05:47.520
<v Speaker 1>I think that starts coming back right.

0:05:47.520 --> 0:05:49.000
<v Speaker 3>This is a little bit concerning if you're going to

0:05:49.040 --> 0:05:51.440
<v Speaker 3>lose these jobs, who's going to take those jobs? The

0:05:51.440 --> 0:05:53.600
<v Speaker 3>same time, you know, continue to use AI. You hear

0:05:53.600 --> 0:05:55.680
<v Speaker 3>about AI slop and people having to redo work. I

0:05:55.680 --> 0:05:57.560
<v Speaker 3>believe with big law firm just have to make some

0:05:57.600 --> 0:05:59.560
<v Speaker 3>announcement that they'd included some hallucination.

0:05:59.720 --> 0:06:01.960
<v Speaker 1>So this is not yet perfect and we're treating it

0:06:02.000 --> 0:06:04.120
<v Speaker 1>that way. So thanks, you don't want to read it

0:06:04.120 --> 0:06:05.120
<v Speaker 1>for your love and again.

0:06:05.000 --> 0:06:06.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I keep for you looking at the fire side

0:06:06.720 --> 0:06:09.760
<v Speaker 3>and you you might be the only species that extincts ourselves.

0:06:09.800 --> 0:06:11.640
<v Speaker 1>It's like we're sitting there and going out over our week.

0:06:11.720 --> 0:06:13.679
<v Speaker 2>The market's encouraging it. And this is the key point

0:06:13.720 --> 0:06:16.560
<v Speaker 2>Lisa makes it. This was interest Citerni research a number

0:06:16.600 --> 0:06:18.400
<v Speaker 2>of months ago, and I thought it was the most

0:06:18.440 --> 0:06:20.919
<v Speaker 2>important point in that research piece, Lisa was that you

0:06:21.000 --> 0:06:24.000
<v Speaker 2>replace the operation expenses the op X, with the capex,

0:06:24.040 --> 0:06:26.039
<v Speaker 2>and the market rewards you for it. So then you

0:06:26.120 --> 0:06:28.000
<v Speaker 2>drop the opex again, you boost the capex, and the

0:06:28.000 --> 0:06:30.240
<v Speaker 2>market rewards you for it, and that's the labor market

0:06:30.240 --> 0:06:32.120
<v Speaker 2>doom loom, and you end up in this really, really

0:06:32.160 --> 0:06:35.120
<v Speaker 2>bad situation where the market's doing well and rewarding that

0:06:35.200 --> 0:06:37.840
<v Speaker 2>kind of behavior, and unemployment starts to climb. Now, I'm

0:06:37.839 --> 0:06:39.479
<v Speaker 2>not saying that's the base case for you, the base

0:06:39.520 --> 0:06:41.159
<v Speaker 2>case for you, or the base case for me. I'm

0:06:41.160 --> 0:06:43.279
<v Speaker 2>just saying that's the fear. That's the fear of what

0:06:43.279 --> 0:06:44.800
<v Speaker 2>could happen in the next several years well.

0:06:44.800 --> 0:06:47.400
<v Speaker 5>And essentially if you start to see companies have to

0:06:47.600 --> 0:06:52.120
<v Speaker 5>justify their expense in capex tied to AI by cutting

0:06:52.120 --> 0:06:54.919
<v Speaker 5>staff for efficiencies, then what does that set us up for?

0:06:55.000 --> 0:06:57.320
<v Speaker 5>I mean, is that essentially what you see going forward, Pete,

0:06:57.360 --> 0:06:59.800
<v Speaker 5>that there's going to be a sense that companies have

0:06:59.839 --> 0:07:02.839
<v Speaker 5>to cut somewhere in order to keep spending on AI

0:07:02.960 --> 0:07:04.240
<v Speaker 5>at the speed that they have been.

0:07:04.360 --> 0:07:06.240
<v Speaker 3>There's certainly some of that sense right now. And again

0:07:06.279 --> 0:07:07.960
<v Speaker 3>I think they're going to get more and more investment

0:07:08.000 --> 0:07:10.880
<v Speaker 3>in the semiconductor industry, right I think that's just one A.

0:07:11.040 --> 0:07:12.120
<v Speaker 1>You've got these companies. B.

0:07:12.320 --> 0:07:14.680
<v Speaker 3>You can start looking at places like Nokia ericson what

0:07:14.760 --> 0:07:16.920
<v Speaker 3>in Europe might benefit if Europe can kind of get

0:07:16.960 --> 0:07:19.720
<v Speaker 3>serious about AI. You've seen some smaller companies. You know

0:07:19.760 --> 0:07:21.720
<v Speaker 3>that Blackbeer I think is a company I own a

0:07:21.760 --> 0:07:23.840
<v Speaker 3>small bit of. All of a sudden, that's interesting because

0:07:23.840 --> 0:07:26.560
<v Speaker 3>they're doing something in the space. So you're seeing kind

0:07:26.600 --> 0:07:28.480
<v Speaker 3>of every and I think, look to okay, what else

0:07:28.480 --> 0:07:30.520
<v Speaker 3>can benefit. I think that's going to drive that part

0:07:30.560 --> 0:07:32.720
<v Speaker 3>of the market. I think it continues to do pretty well.

0:07:33.200 --> 0:07:35.600
<v Speaker 2>Can I just get funn of word on government intervention?

0:07:36.000 --> 0:07:38.080
<v Speaker 2>Intel talked a lot about spirit and what's going to happen.

0:07:38.080 --> 0:07:40.960
<v Speaker 2>There was save that conversation for later this morning. Intel.

0:07:41.240 --> 0:07:43.880
<v Speaker 2>I don't want to downplay the real developments taking place

0:07:43.880 --> 0:07:45.680
<v Speaker 2>of this company, but how many companies do you think

0:07:45.680 --> 0:07:48.640
<v Speaker 2>of re engaging with Intel because of the government involvement

0:07:48.720 --> 0:07:51.040
<v Speaker 2>and the halo that offers, and maybe they want to

0:07:51.040 --> 0:07:51.680
<v Speaker 2>play some people.

0:07:51.960 --> 0:07:53.840
<v Speaker 3>I think when that was part of why we had

0:07:53.840 --> 0:07:56.600
<v Speaker 3>the prosac right and we concluded Intel because of the

0:07:56.600 --> 0:07:58.880
<v Speaker 3>ten percent government stake. And part of my thesis had

0:07:58.880 --> 0:08:01.480
<v Speaker 3>been Trump likes to win. Trump owns this on behalf

0:08:01.480 --> 0:08:03.560
<v Speaker 3>of the American people, So the American people are winning,

0:08:03.880 --> 0:08:06.200
<v Speaker 3>but people are going to do business with this company

0:08:06.440 --> 0:08:08.119
<v Speaker 3>because you want to be on the right side of Trump.

0:08:08.200 --> 0:08:09.960
<v Speaker 3>So I think that was part of my thesis. I

0:08:10.000 --> 0:08:12.440
<v Speaker 3>think that's probably played out very well, for better or

0:08:12.440 --> 0:08:15.000
<v Speaker 3>for worse. I do wish that when we're making these investments,

0:08:15.040 --> 0:08:17.480
<v Speaker 3>whether it's in that there were some guidelines set up

0:08:17.640 --> 0:08:19.360
<v Speaker 3>and that we had some group that actually does this

0:08:19.440 --> 0:08:22.280
<v Speaker 3>and was well organized. That's not how this administration works,

0:08:22.360 --> 0:08:24.920
<v Speaker 3>and fighting how this administration works isn't a good way

0:08:24.960 --> 0:08:27.480
<v Speaker 3>to make money. Figuring out how the administration works and

0:08:27.960 --> 0:08:29.400
<v Speaker 3>taking advantage or following it.

0:08:29.440 --> 0:08:30.960
<v Speaker 1>I think is Ben's nice.

0:08:30.800 --> 0:08:33.080
<v Speaker 2>Defense contract is Flying Spirit because that was going to

0:08:33.080 --> 0:08:34.120
<v Speaker 2>happen next Now.

0:08:34.160 --> 0:08:36.560
<v Speaker 3>I do think I'm looking for, you know, anything in

0:08:36.559 --> 0:08:38.280
<v Speaker 3>the drone space. The drone space is just going to

0:08:38.280 --> 0:08:39.679
<v Speaker 3>continue to take off. I think a lot of those

0:08:39.679 --> 0:08:41.760
<v Speaker 3>companies are private, though I'd expect a lot of IPOs.

0:08:41.880 --> 0:08:43.559
<v Speaker 3>As we were talking offline, you know, there's going to

0:08:43.600 --> 0:08:45.320
<v Speaker 3>be IPOs and everything. I think you're going to see that.

0:08:45.440 --> 0:08:47.760
<v Speaker 3>And I think surface drones have not get enough attention.

0:08:47.880 --> 0:08:50.160
<v Speaker 3>That's you know, boats basically, So you can look at

0:08:50.200 --> 0:08:53.240
<v Speaker 3>companies again, I think the shipbuilding industry, which is allegedly

0:08:53.280 --> 0:08:56.840
<v Speaker 3>why the Secretary of the Navy was let go as

0:08:56.880 --> 0:08:59.079
<v Speaker 3>he was not focusing enough on shipbuilding. That's an area

0:08:59.120 --> 0:09:00.680
<v Speaker 3>I think is going to gain inten I look at

0:09:00.720 --> 0:09:03.160
<v Speaker 3>Brunswick for example. They make small boats, you know, not

0:09:03.240 --> 0:09:05.160
<v Speaker 3>military or anything like that, but why don't they get

0:09:05.160 --> 0:09:05.680
<v Speaker 3>involved in this.

0:09:05.760 --> 0:09:07.640
<v Speaker 1>I think you're going to see that this.

0:09:07.840 --> 0:09:10.760
<v Speaker 3>Drone space explode, and I think shipbuilding really is a

0:09:10.800 --> 0:09:13.320
<v Speaker 3>big focus that we need to do. So that's if

0:09:13.360 --> 0:09:15.679
<v Speaker 3>I'm bathing right now, I'm shifting some money out of

0:09:15.720 --> 0:09:17.840
<v Speaker 3>maybe the semis that have done so well, I'm looking

0:09:17.840 --> 0:09:18.480
<v Speaker 3>for other things.

0:09:19.080 --> 0:09:31.920
<v Speaker 2>Stay with US Mulblindberg surveillance coming up after this. So

0:09:31.960 --> 0:09:35.480
<v Speaker 2>here's the latest this morning, a US soldier facing charges

0:09:35.520 --> 0:09:39.880
<v Speaker 2>for allegedly using classified intel to rake in over four

0:09:39.960 --> 0:09:42.720
<v Speaker 2>hundred thousand on polymarket betting on the timing of the

0:09:42.720 --> 0:09:45.880
<v Speaker 2>capture of Venezuela's then president Nicholas Maduro. With the latest

0:09:45.920 --> 0:09:49.520
<v Speaker 2>in Washington, Amory has more Montinggomery, Good.

0:09:49.280 --> 0:09:51.840
<v Speaker 6>Morning, John, And it's not just what's happening in terms

0:09:51.920 --> 0:09:56.880
<v Speaker 6>of this criminal investigation, but also the CFTC is lodging

0:09:56.920 --> 0:10:00.000
<v Speaker 6>its very own in parallel civil investigation into this soul.

0:10:00.400 --> 0:10:02.640
<v Speaker 6>And this marks the first time we see that regular

0:10:02.840 --> 0:10:05.960
<v Speaker 6>take that step when it comes to prediction markets. It

0:10:06.040 --> 0:10:08.560
<v Speaker 6>also comes to this own White House sent out a

0:10:08.600 --> 0:10:10.880
<v Speaker 6>memo to staff a few weeks ago to make sure

0:10:10.920 --> 0:10:14.120
<v Speaker 6>that they are not making these kinds of bets, especially

0:10:14.160 --> 0:10:17.599
<v Speaker 6>given they have access to information. And we've seen a

0:10:17.679 --> 0:10:20.320
<v Speaker 6>number of sizable trades, not just when it comes to

0:10:20.640 --> 0:10:24.360
<v Speaker 6>trading platforms online like Caushee and Polymarket, but also in

0:10:24.400 --> 0:10:27.560
<v Speaker 6>our own financial markets, especially when it comes to massive

0:10:27.720 --> 0:10:30.960
<v Speaker 6>oil positions put on in a timely fashion before the

0:10:31.000 --> 0:10:33.760
<v Speaker 6>President comes out with a truth social post and for

0:10:33.840 --> 0:10:35.640
<v Speaker 6>more of this. I'm very glad to be joined by

0:10:35.679 --> 0:10:38.280
<v Speaker 6>John Lieber of your Asia group or friend of the show. John,

0:10:38.280 --> 0:10:40.520
<v Speaker 6>thank you so much for joining joining me. So the

0:10:40.559 --> 0:10:43.480
<v Speaker 6>CFTC is also joining in on this in a parallel suit.

0:10:43.920 --> 0:10:46.440
<v Speaker 6>Are we going to see more of these kinds of lawsuits?

0:10:46.640 --> 0:10:47.440
<v Speaker 1>I hope so.

0:10:47.600 --> 0:10:49.280
<v Speaker 7>I mean, I think this is actually a pretty major

0:10:49.320 --> 0:10:51.880
<v Speaker 7>issue where you've got government officials who are using their

0:10:51.880 --> 0:10:55.520
<v Speaker 7>position to profit and the proliferation of new markets that

0:10:55.600 --> 0:10:58.240
<v Speaker 7>allow that to happen with very little oversight and very

0:10:58.240 --> 0:11:00.440
<v Speaker 7>little regulation means we're going to see more of it.

0:11:00.480 --> 0:11:03.040
<v Speaker 7>So I'm actually surprised the CFTC has gotten in on this.

0:11:03.440 --> 0:11:07.480
<v Speaker 7>The oil investigation that they're launching about Trump's Aron attacks,

0:11:07.679 --> 0:11:09.760
<v Speaker 7>who knows where that thing leads. I mean, these could

0:11:09.800 --> 0:11:14.560
<v Speaker 7>be some very politically sensitive investigations, and I think that

0:11:14.640 --> 0:11:16.920
<v Speaker 7>as these things proliferate, you're going to see more of this.

0:11:17.240 --> 0:11:17.400
<v Speaker 8>Rep.

0:11:17.520 --> 0:11:20.400
<v Speaker 6>Luna yesterday took to Twitter and said, less the DOJ

0:11:20.600 --> 0:11:23.040
<v Speaker 6>plans on going after all the crooks in Congress currently

0:11:23.120 --> 0:11:23.839
<v Speaker 6>insider trading.

0:11:23.880 --> 0:11:26.160
<v Speaker 4>This is simply skewed justice. Will there be.

0:11:26.120 --> 0:11:31.040
<v Speaker 6>More pressure on Congress to also make sure that Congressional lawmakers, senators,

0:11:31.120 --> 0:11:32.320
<v Speaker 6>staffers cannot trade.

0:11:32.400 --> 0:11:35.240
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, there's been pressure on Congress to stop getting rich

0:11:35.280 --> 0:11:37.960
<v Speaker 7>off of inside information for decades now, and it seems

0:11:37.960 --> 0:11:39.960
<v Speaker 7>like members of Congress somehow find a way to keep

0:11:40.080 --> 0:11:43.520
<v Speaker 7>getting wealthier. So I doubt there will be any serious enforcement.

0:11:43.559 --> 0:11:46.360
<v Speaker 7>The Stock Act was passed over a decade ago, and

0:11:46.480 --> 0:11:50.400
<v Speaker 7>there haven't been that many prosecutions, meaningful prosecutions brought under it.

0:11:51.040 --> 0:11:53.839
<v Speaker 7>I think that probably Congressional staff are certainly scared about this.

0:11:54.160 --> 0:11:57.160
<v Speaker 7>Members of Congress are right now more or less above

0:11:57.160 --> 0:11:57.600
<v Speaker 7>the law.

0:11:57.480 --> 0:11:58.920
<v Speaker 6>Here when it comes to Congress and the War and

0:11:58.960 --> 0:12:00.760
<v Speaker 6>Iron there's an important deay line coming up when it

0:12:00.800 --> 0:12:01.920
<v Speaker 6>comes to the War Powers Act.

0:12:02.000 --> 0:12:03.240
<v Speaker 4>Does it matter to this White House?

0:12:03.480 --> 0:12:04.280
<v Speaker 1>No, I don't think so.

0:12:04.400 --> 0:12:06.800
<v Speaker 7>I think the War Powers Act, which was passed decades

0:12:06.840 --> 0:12:08.800
<v Speaker 7>ago in order to be a check on the president's

0:12:08.840 --> 0:12:11.040
<v Speaker 7>power to do exactly what Trump is doing in Irun

0:12:11.160 --> 0:12:13.600
<v Speaker 7>right now, is more or less defunct as long as

0:12:13.600 --> 0:12:16.840
<v Speaker 7>Congress is not willing to enforce it. And unfortunately, the

0:12:16.840 --> 0:12:19.320
<v Speaker 7>only enforcement mechanism they have is impeachment, and we know

0:12:19.360 --> 0:12:21.240
<v Speaker 7>they're not going to impeach Trump, So what are they

0:12:21.240 --> 0:12:21.880
<v Speaker 7>going to do here?

0:12:21.960 --> 0:12:24.800
<v Speaker 6>Does this change though potentially after the Metrum elections, if

0:12:24.840 --> 0:12:27.520
<v Speaker 6>we do see a changing of power, whether that's in

0:12:27.520 --> 0:12:28.600
<v Speaker 6>the House or the Senate, it.

0:12:28.559 --> 0:12:30.880
<v Speaker 7>Could I mean, the Democrats would certainly control the House

0:12:30.920 --> 0:12:34.600
<v Speaker 7>and maybe the Senate. But you still have the enforcement here,

0:12:34.640 --> 0:12:37.000
<v Speaker 7>which is you know, it doesn't it isn't really there's

0:12:37.000 --> 0:12:39.800
<v Speaker 7>no real enforcement channel. And I think President Trump, who

0:12:39.800 --> 0:12:42.720
<v Speaker 7>in his first term disputed the legality of the War

0:12:42.760 --> 0:12:46.559
<v Speaker 7>Powers Act as an unconstitutional check on his ability to

0:12:46.800 --> 0:12:50.640
<v Speaker 7>conduct foreign affairs, I think probably continues to just ignore this.

0:12:50.800 --> 0:12:51.000
<v Speaker 2>Well.

0:12:51.000 --> 0:12:52.960
<v Speaker 6>Obama sort of ignored it as well when it comes

0:12:53.000 --> 0:12:54.040
<v Speaker 6>to Libby's So we've seen.

0:12:53.920 --> 0:12:58.200
<v Speaker 7>This simple circumstantial legality, right, circumstantial rule of law, where

0:12:58.240 --> 0:12:59.760
<v Speaker 7>you care about it when it's your side, and you

0:12:59.760 --> 0:13:01.760
<v Speaker 7>don't care about it when it's preventing you from doing

0:13:01.760 --> 0:13:02.280
<v Speaker 7>what you want.

0:13:02.480 --> 0:13:04.400
<v Speaker 6>When it comes to the war in Iran, where's your

0:13:04.440 --> 0:13:07.160
<v Speaker 6>rasure right now? In terms of this potential off ramp

0:13:07.320 --> 0:13:09.840
<v Speaker 6>talks that are happening. There was a cease fire announced

0:13:09.880 --> 0:13:12.360
<v Speaker 6>yesterday by the President. When it comes to Israel Lebanon,

0:13:12.440 --> 0:13:14.400
<v Speaker 6>does that help the United States when it comes to

0:13:14.400 --> 0:13:16.240
<v Speaker 6>trying to get the Iranians back at the table.

0:13:16.360 --> 0:13:18.120
<v Speaker 7>So if you look at where the two sides are

0:13:18.200 --> 0:13:21.520
<v Speaker 7>right now. The Iranians look pretty dug in. They've got

0:13:21.559 --> 0:13:24.040
<v Speaker 7>a flow of oil moving out. They've got oil revenues

0:13:24.080 --> 0:13:26.480
<v Speaker 7>that are much higher than what they originally budgeted for

0:13:26.800 --> 0:13:29.720
<v Speaker 7>this year, with two million barrels a day on average

0:13:29.720 --> 0:13:32.400
<v Speaker 7>going out over the last month or so. That probably

0:13:32.480 --> 0:13:37.800
<v Speaker 7>drops significantly under the US barricade that's happening, but the

0:13:37.920 --> 0:13:41.200
<v Speaker 7>US is quickly backpedaling off of its position. We don't

0:13:41.200 --> 0:13:43.720
<v Speaker 7>think Trump is able to go back in in any

0:13:43.760 --> 0:13:46.520
<v Speaker 7>meaningful way because of the political constraints that are on

0:13:46.600 --> 0:13:48.880
<v Speaker 7>him in the United States, and the Iranians know this.

0:13:49.040 --> 0:13:51.679
<v Speaker 7>So I think the negotiations that are happening right now

0:13:52.080 --> 0:13:54.360
<v Speaker 7>eventually do lead to some kind of a deal that

0:13:54.400 --> 0:13:56.880
<v Speaker 7>reopens the strait, let's say, by the end of May,

0:13:57.520 --> 0:13:59.040
<v Speaker 7>and I think this weekend is going to be a

0:13:59.120 --> 0:14:02.880
<v Speaker 7>key times two sides are exchanging ideas about what exactly

0:14:02.920 --> 0:14:05.559
<v Speaker 7>the Iranians are going to do. Probably they stop, are

0:14:05.559 --> 0:14:08.480
<v Speaker 7>forced to stop enriching uranium. They probably get some pause

0:14:08.520 --> 0:14:11.640
<v Speaker 7>over some period of time, and the US probably ends

0:14:11.720 --> 0:14:14.120
<v Speaker 7>up lifting some of these sanctions, which looks a lot

0:14:14.200 --> 0:14:17.080
<v Speaker 7>like the JCPOA that President Obama.

0:14:16.600 --> 0:14:18.760
<v Speaker 6>As you're saying this, I'm like, Okay, I've seen this

0:14:18.840 --> 0:14:21.080
<v Speaker 6>deal before that the President then ripped up and Trump

0:14:21.120 --> 0:14:24.360
<v Speaker 6>want Is Trump willing to take a deal that he

0:14:24.880 --> 0:14:29.160
<v Speaker 6>in his prior term would say that it is not efficient?

0:14:29.280 --> 0:14:31.520
<v Speaker 7>So if o're betting on poly market, I would have

0:14:31.520 --> 0:14:33.280
<v Speaker 7>lost a lot of money betting on Trump right now.

0:14:33.360 --> 0:14:35.360
<v Speaker 7>So who knows what he's going to do. But right now,

0:14:35.480 --> 0:14:37.400
<v Speaker 7>the signals that the White House are sending or that

0:14:37.440 --> 0:14:40.000
<v Speaker 7>they are backing off of their heat demands and they

0:14:40.080 --> 0:14:42.280
<v Speaker 7>want to get a deal to make this thing go away.

0:14:42.480 --> 0:14:45.120
<v Speaker 7>And that's at least the direction of travel right now.

0:14:45.280 --> 0:14:47.360
<v Speaker 7>Trump of course can change his mind at any time

0:14:47.440 --> 0:14:50.680
<v Speaker 7>for any reason, but that's what it looks like right now.

0:14:50.840 --> 0:14:54.360
<v Speaker 6>I spoke to the former Centcom commander Motel yesterday as

0:14:54.400 --> 0:14:57.840
<v Speaker 6>well as a six time CIA station chief, and they

0:14:57.880 --> 0:14:59.160
<v Speaker 6>said nine to twelve.

0:14:58.840 --> 0:15:01.560
<v Speaker 7>Months straight is open again until things.

0:15:01.360 --> 0:15:01.920
<v Speaker 4>Are back to normal.

0:15:02.000 --> 0:15:02.840
<v Speaker 6>Potentially we have a deal.

0:15:03.000 --> 0:15:04.760
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, I think, well, I mean I think there's going

0:15:04.840 --> 0:15:06.440
<v Speaker 7>to be. There's kind of two levels of a deal.

0:15:06.480 --> 0:15:09.560
<v Speaker 7>There's like the memorandum of understanding that allows the blockades

0:15:09.600 --> 0:15:11.800
<v Speaker 7>to go away and the Iranians can open the strait

0:15:11.840 --> 0:15:14.400
<v Speaker 7>once again. And then there's a deal, which is, you know,

0:15:14.480 --> 0:15:17.360
<v Speaker 7>you move uranium out of the country, we get inspectors in.

0:15:17.480 --> 0:15:19.720
<v Speaker 7>Here's some cash. So I think that the deal part

0:15:19.720 --> 0:15:21.960
<v Speaker 7>of it might take a little longer. But right now

0:15:22.000 --> 0:15:24.280
<v Speaker 7>we think they are headed towards some kind of memorandum

0:15:24.280 --> 0:15:26.920
<v Speaker 7>of understanding that would sketch out the parameters of a

0:15:26.960 --> 0:15:29.200
<v Speaker 7>deal without even if something's not written. But I do

0:15:29.280 --> 0:15:32.160
<v Speaker 7>agree that the disruptions we're living with right now are

0:15:32.200 --> 0:15:33.840
<v Speaker 7>going to be with us for a while, and the

0:15:33.880 --> 0:15:36.160
<v Speaker 7>strait's not going to be fully open till at least

0:15:36.240 --> 0:15:37.760
<v Speaker 7>the middle of the summer, if not beyond that.

0:15:37.880 --> 0:15:40.360
<v Speaker 6>Right Actually, I said yesterday that they were laying more minds.

0:15:41.200 --> 0:15:43.720
<v Speaker 6>Doesn't the Iranians want to make this as complicated for

0:15:43.760 --> 0:15:45.080
<v Speaker 6>the president before the Metrum election?

0:15:45.320 --> 0:15:47.160
<v Speaker 7>Certainly that's what it looks like right now. There's been

0:15:47.200 --> 0:15:51.160
<v Speaker 7>a lot of reporting about how Trump's tweeting is disrupting

0:15:51.200 --> 0:15:55.440
<v Speaker 7>the negotiations and the Iranians, I think, think they're playing

0:15:55.440 --> 0:15:57.600
<v Speaker 7>a stronger hand, and I think they're playing a stronger

0:15:57.640 --> 0:16:00.120
<v Speaker 7>hand too, So I think that puts the Americans at

0:16:00.160 --> 0:16:02.560
<v Speaker 7>a very difficult position in the negotiation here.

0:16:02.600 --> 0:16:04.720
<v Speaker 6>If we think they're winning, then why would they back off.

0:16:05.200 --> 0:16:06.440
<v Speaker 7>They want it to be I mean, I think everyone

0:16:06.440 --> 0:16:08.760
<v Speaker 7>wants us to be over, for LEFE to return to normal.

0:16:09.080 --> 0:16:12.600
<v Speaker 2>Stay with us. More Blindberg surveillance coming up after this.

0:16:21.720 --> 0:16:25.000
<v Speaker 2>If Veronica Klankov SETI writing this on the Fed's next move,

0:16:25.040 --> 0:16:27.920
<v Speaker 2>we expect a combination of self decoor inflation and loosening

0:16:27.960 --> 0:16:30.320
<v Speaker 2>labor markets to help Wash convince the maturity if the

0:16:30.360 --> 0:16:32.960
<v Speaker 2>FMC to cut rates before the end of the year.

0:16:33.000 --> 0:16:34.120
<v Speaker 2>For Ronica joined us now for more.

0:16:34.160 --> 0:16:35.960
<v Speaker 4>For roonicha good morning, Good to see it.

0:16:36.080 --> 0:16:38.440
<v Speaker 2>Kevin Walsh did not really articulate a good arguments cut

0:16:38.480 --> 0:16:40.560
<v Speaker 2>interest rates this week. Is that because there isn't one

0:16:40.760 --> 0:16:41.760
<v Speaker 2>or because he didn't want to?

0:16:41.960 --> 0:16:43.360
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I think he just repeated this.

0:16:43.440 --> 0:16:46.920
<v Speaker 8>You know, productivity enhancements, gains from AI, things like that

0:16:46.920 --> 0:16:49.280
<v Speaker 8>that can be disinflationary. We can cut and not stand

0:16:49.280 --> 0:16:52.680
<v Speaker 8>in the way of stronger growth. That's argument the administration

0:16:52.720 --> 0:16:54.480
<v Speaker 8>has been making, though I don't think that's one that

0:16:54.760 --> 0:16:56.960
<v Speaker 8>other FED officials are going to buy until we see

0:16:57.000 --> 0:17:00.800
<v Speaker 8>it in software inflation data itself. Yeah, he was not

0:17:01.440 --> 0:17:03.840
<v Speaker 8>terribly convincing, at least in terms of the near term.

0:17:03.840 --> 0:17:06.080
<v Speaker 2>Pass your time info cuts changed has it been pushed

0:17:06.080 --> 0:17:07.520
<v Speaker 2>down because of this shock of the Middle East.

0:17:07.640 --> 0:17:09.880
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, we did. We pushed it out to September.

0:17:10.320 --> 0:17:12.760
<v Speaker 8>But I think what we'll see and obviously it will depend,

0:17:12.760 --> 0:17:14.600
<v Speaker 8>of course on what happens in the Middle East with

0:17:14.640 --> 0:17:17.440
<v Speaker 8>oil prices, but the focus the next couple months will

0:17:17.440 --> 0:17:20.200
<v Speaker 8>absolutely still be inflation. Data will get some uncomfortably strong

0:17:20.240 --> 0:17:23.120
<v Speaker 8>readings even in April and may, I think, but as

0:17:23.160 --> 0:17:26.080
<v Speaker 8>we get into the summer, I do think we won't see,

0:17:26.320 --> 0:17:28.919
<v Speaker 8>you know, the substantial pass through of higher energy prices

0:17:28.920 --> 0:17:31.760
<v Speaker 8>to core inflation. And what has happened in the summer

0:17:31.760 --> 0:17:33.440
<v Speaker 8>of the last few years is that that's when the

0:17:33.520 --> 0:17:36.040
<v Speaker 8>labor market starts to look weaker, and I think that

0:17:36.119 --> 0:17:38.400
<v Speaker 8>will repeat, and then the pattern has been that then

0:17:38.480 --> 0:17:39.680
<v Speaker 8>the FED cuts in September.

0:17:39.800 --> 0:17:42.080
<v Speaker 5>How many scenarios do you have right now on your

0:17:42.080 --> 0:17:45.360
<v Speaker 5>desk and potential outcomes for employment and inflation?

0:17:45.520 --> 0:17:46.760
<v Speaker 4>Too many?

0:17:46.920 --> 0:17:49.959
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, there's too many, even if you weren't even if

0:17:49.960 --> 0:17:51.719
<v Speaker 8>we weren't dealing with the oil shock. You know, this

0:17:51.760 --> 0:17:54.160
<v Speaker 8>is a labor market that's very unlike any that we've

0:17:54.160 --> 0:17:56.800
<v Speaker 8>seen before, and so it's really hard to forecast when

0:17:56.840 --> 0:17:59.840
<v Speaker 8>you don't have historical comparisons. To to basose forecasts on

0:18:00.560 --> 0:18:03.000
<v Speaker 8>so all we're really doing is for the labor market

0:18:03.000 --> 0:18:04.400
<v Speaker 8>at least looking at you know, this is a very

0:18:04.440 --> 0:18:06.119
<v Speaker 8>low higher low fire dynamic.

0:18:06.240 --> 0:18:07.960
<v Speaker 4>It's happened this way for a while.

0:18:08.840 --> 0:18:11.719
<v Speaker 8>What that has meant the last few years is starting

0:18:11.760 --> 0:18:13.960
<v Speaker 8>within the next couple of weeks, jobless claims start to

0:18:14.040 --> 0:18:17.000
<v Speaker 8>rise in the summer, and that precedes a rise in

0:18:17.040 --> 0:18:18.760
<v Speaker 8>the unemployment rate by the end of the year, just

0:18:18.800 --> 0:18:19.600
<v Speaker 8>three to four tenths.

0:18:19.600 --> 0:18:20.280
<v Speaker 4>It's gradual.

0:18:20.960 --> 0:18:22.760
<v Speaker 8>But yeah, this a lot of ways, this is an

0:18:22.760 --> 0:18:24.679
<v Speaker 8>economy that is very unfamiliar to us.

0:18:25.000 --> 0:18:27.600
<v Speaker 5>Is there anything about the earnings that gives you pause?

0:18:27.800 --> 0:18:30.560
<v Speaker 5>Given the fact that we're seeing very strong earnings, consumer

0:18:30.600 --> 0:18:33.520
<v Speaker 5>discretionary companies coming out and saying that demand remains strong

0:18:33.640 --> 0:18:37.280
<v Speaker 5>even amid some higher prices, and you have credit card

0:18:37.280 --> 0:18:39.280
<v Speaker 5>companies coming out and saying people are still spending. I mean,

0:18:39.320 --> 0:18:42.120
<v Speaker 5>at a certain point, do you say prices remain where

0:18:42.119 --> 0:18:45.040
<v Speaker 5>they are right now? In the energy complex, we can

0:18:45.119 --> 0:18:48.040
<v Speaker 5>maintain this level of activity and frankly that becomes more

0:18:48.040 --> 0:18:50.119
<v Speaker 5>inflationary than it does, but suppressive of growth.

0:18:50.240 --> 0:18:52.960
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, the earnings and the survey data and these anecdotes,

0:18:53.000 --> 0:18:55.359
<v Speaker 8>they're they're interesting, but it's always kind of hard to

0:18:55.359 --> 0:18:59.879
<v Speaker 8>translate those to macro forecasts aggregate data. I mean, if anything,

0:19:00.000 --> 0:19:02.440
<v Speaker 8>in some cases it seems like earnings are stronger because

0:19:02.440 --> 0:19:05.760
<v Speaker 8>of job losses and cutting costs. That way, what we've

0:19:05.760 --> 0:19:08.200
<v Speaker 8>seen in the actual spending data of the last.

0:19:08.040 --> 0:19:10.800
<v Speaker 4>Few months or so is, yes, consumption is very resilient.

0:19:10.840 --> 0:19:13.240
<v Speaker 8>That's been the story for the last few years. But

0:19:13.280 --> 0:19:15.360
<v Speaker 8>we were slowing as we were getting into this year.

0:19:15.880 --> 0:19:17.800
<v Speaker 8>Of course, we've had a very strong retail sales print

0:19:17.920 --> 0:19:21.120
<v Speaker 8>this week. A lot of that is nominal higher gas prices.

0:19:21.760 --> 0:19:23.359
<v Speaker 8>There is a bit of a cushion right now for

0:19:23.440 --> 0:19:25.840
<v Speaker 8>some consumers, you know, getting higher tax refunds than they

0:19:25.840 --> 0:19:29.040
<v Speaker 8>did last year. But the primary driver of if people

0:19:29.080 --> 0:19:31.280
<v Speaker 8>are spending or not, I think is aggregate take home

0:19:31.400 --> 0:19:33.400
<v Speaker 8>labor income, and that is slowing this year.

0:19:34.400 --> 0:19:37.960
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Survendans podcast, bringing you the best

0:19:38.000 --> 0:19:41.040
<v Speaker 2>in markets, economics, an gient politics. You can watch the

0:19:41.080 --> 0:19:44.080
<v Speaker 2>show live on bloombog TV weekday mornings from six am

0:19:44.240 --> 0:19:47.399
<v Speaker 2>to nine am Eastern. Subscribe to the podcast on Apple,

0:19:47.680 --> 0:19:50.520
<v Speaker 2>Spotify or anywhere else you listen, and as always on

0:19:50.520 --> 0:19:53.040
<v Speaker 2>the bloomblog terminal and the Bloomberg Business app