WEBVTT - Reaction to Jonathan Kuminga vs. Golden State Warriors saga, Steph Curry & Jimmy Butler impact

0:00:01.280 --> 0:00:16.760
<v Speaker 1>The volume. All right, Well, good to hoops tonight, you're

0:00:16.800 --> 0:00:18.840
<v Speaker 1>at the volume. Happy twosday everybody. Hope all of you

0:00:18.840 --> 0:00:21.000
<v Speaker 1>guys are having a great start to your week. It

0:00:21.000 --> 0:00:23.320
<v Speaker 1>feels good to be back from vacation. Have one last

0:00:23.320 --> 0:00:26.360
<v Speaker 1>little getaway before we start the season. I went up

0:00:26.400 --> 0:00:28.320
<v Speaker 1>to the Pacific Northwest again. I got to go to

0:00:28.400 --> 0:00:30.440
<v Speaker 1>a place I've never been before. We went to Olympic

0:00:30.560 --> 0:00:33.120
<v Speaker 1>National Park and I got to do My favorite highlight

0:00:33.200 --> 0:00:35.320
<v Speaker 1>of the trip was the Hurricane Ridge hike, where you

0:00:35.320 --> 0:00:38.480
<v Speaker 1>get to see like this crazy panorama. You see Mount

0:00:38.520 --> 0:00:41.760
<v Speaker 1>Olympus and all of the rest of the Olympic Range,

0:00:41.800 --> 0:00:44.960
<v Speaker 1>you see the Strait of Wundafuca, you see Victoria, see

0:00:44.960 --> 0:00:46.839
<v Speaker 1>Port Angeles. And then we had a clear day so

0:00:46.920 --> 0:00:48.720
<v Speaker 1>in the distance you could see Mount Baker, which was

0:00:48.720 --> 0:00:50.800
<v Speaker 1>a volcano I've been trying to see for years and

0:00:50.840 --> 0:00:53.559
<v Speaker 1>it's just always been covered by clouds or it's been

0:00:53.720 --> 0:00:55.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, in front of some ridge that I couldn't

0:00:55.600 --> 0:00:57.280
<v Speaker 1>see over something. So it was just like a really

0:00:57.280 --> 0:01:00.880
<v Speaker 1>cool trip. Got to do some relaxing, spend some time

0:01:00.920 --> 0:01:03.560
<v Speaker 1>with some friends that were up in the Pacific Northwest.

0:01:03.560 --> 0:01:05.200
<v Speaker 1>Had some of my old friends from Tucson meet us

0:01:05.240 --> 0:01:07.319
<v Speaker 1>up there. It was a great little getaway, but you

0:01:07.400 --> 0:01:10.199
<v Speaker 1>can sense it. We are a week away from training camp.

0:01:10.800 --> 0:01:13.080
<v Speaker 1>And in addition to being a week away from training camp,

0:01:13.080 --> 0:01:15.400
<v Speaker 1>the Golden State Warriors only have nine basketball players on

0:01:15.440 --> 0:01:18.600
<v Speaker 1>their roster right now, as the Jonathan Kaminga situation has

0:01:18.640 --> 0:01:22.080
<v Speaker 1>stretched through this entire summer, and so I wanted to

0:01:22.280 --> 0:01:24.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of touch base there and talk about some of

0:01:24.440 --> 0:01:26.360
<v Speaker 1>the new intel that we got from Sam Sharania and

0:01:26.720 --> 0:01:28.679
<v Speaker 1>just kind of give my take on where this situation

0:01:28.800 --> 0:01:30.720
<v Speaker 1>is going at this point. And then at the tail

0:01:30.800 --> 0:01:32.720
<v Speaker 1>end of the show today, I've got four mail bag questions.

0:01:32.760 --> 0:01:35.120
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna do a couple of mini mail bags this week.

0:01:35.120 --> 0:01:36.800
<v Speaker 1>You guys know the joke before we get started. Subscribe

0:01:36.800 --> 0:01:38.400
<v Speaker 1>to Hoops and O YouTube channels. You don't miss any

0:01:38.400 --> 0:01:40.480
<v Speaker 1>more of our videos. Follow me on Twitter at Underscore

0:01:40.560 --> 0:01:42.800
<v Speaker 1>JSNLT so you guys don't miss show announcements. So forget

0:01:42.800 --> 0:01:44.479
<v Speaker 1>about a podcast feed. Wherever you get your podcast under

0:01:44.480 --> 0:01:46.520
<v Speaker 1>Hoops Tonight. It's also super helpful if you leave a

0:01:46.640 --> 0:01:49.520
<v Speaker 1>rating and a review on that front. Jackson's also doing

0:01:49.520 --> 0:01:52.240
<v Speaker 1>incredible work on our social media feeds on Twitter, Instagram, Facebook,

0:01:52.240 --> 0:01:54.240
<v Speaker 1>and TikTok. Make sure you guys follow us there, and then,

0:01:54.320 --> 0:01:57.600
<v Speaker 1>last but not least, keep dropping mail bag questions in

0:01:57.640 --> 0:01:59.200
<v Speaker 1>the YouTube comments and we'll get to them in our

0:01:59.200 --> 0:02:01.760
<v Speaker 1>mail bags throughout the remainder of the season. All right,

0:02:01.800 --> 0:02:04.600
<v Speaker 1>let's talk some basketball. So the stalemate continues. We're just

0:02:04.720 --> 0:02:07.640
<v Speaker 1>one week away from the started training camp. The Warriors

0:02:07.640 --> 0:02:10.360
<v Speaker 1>have just nine players on the roster for next season.

0:02:10.400 --> 0:02:13.359
<v Speaker 1>Still a lot more exciting than what they were looking

0:02:13.400 --> 0:02:15.800
<v Speaker 1>at last season, given that Jimmy Butler is now in

0:02:15.840 --> 0:02:18.680
<v Speaker 1>the fold, and we saw a pretty extended stretch of

0:02:18.720 --> 0:02:23.280
<v Speaker 1>successful basketball from Steph, Jimmy and Raymond to end the season.

0:02:23.320 --> 0:02:26.080
<v Speaker 1>And theoretically there are a bunch of players guys like

0:02:26.120 --> 0:02:29.280
<v Speaker 1>Al Horford and Seth Curry and d Anthony Melton who

0:02:29.360 --> 0:02:31.600
<v Speaker 1>are most likely going to sign with Golden State. But

0:02:31.639 --> 0:02:35.040
<v Speaker 1>they're all waiting around for this Jonathan Minga situation and

0:02:35.120 --> 0:02:38.480
<v Speaker 1>nobody is blinking. Not a week ago, Shams Ronnie came

0:02:38.480 --> 0:02:40.600
<v Speaker 1>out with the report talking about how the Warriors have

0:02:40.720 --> 0:02:43.919
<v Speaker 1>raised their offer to essentially twenty five million per year

0:02:43.919 --> 0:02:47.079
<v Speaker 1>for three years, with a team option on that third year,

0:02:47.160 --> 0:02:50.840
<v Speaker 1>essentially coming up to the annual value that Josh Kitty

0:02:50.960 --> 0:02:55.480
<v Speaker 1>got from Chicago, but obviously shorter term, less guaranteed money.

0:02:56.320 --> 0:02:59.280
<v Speaker 1>Sean's reported that Kaminga's camp has basically told the Warriors

0:02:59.320 --> 0:03:02.320
<v Speaker 1>will take the if you just flip the team option

0:03:02.440 --> 0:03:05.720
<v Speaker 1>into a player option, basically adding twenty five million in

0:03:05.880 --> 0:03:09.040
<v Speaker 1>guaranteed money to the deal. Essentially, if he takes the

0:03:09.040 --> 0:03:11.920
<v Speaker 1>deal the Warriors are offering and he doesn't perform, either

0:03:11.960 --> 0:03:14.560
<v Speaker 1>for them or for whoever trades for him, there's a

0:03:14.639 --> 0:03:17.040
<v Speaker 1>version of this where the team declines the option and

0:03:17.120 --> 0:03:19.360
<v Speaker 1>he gets capped out at that fifty million, and he

0:03:19.400 --> 0:03:22.560
<v Speaker 1>could be looking at much smaller deals for the remainder

0:03:22.560 --> 0:03:25.600
<v Speaker 1>of his career. That's a potential risk that Kaminga would

0:03:25.600 --> 0:03:28.080
<v Speaker 1>be taking in that situation. Whereas for the Warriors, if

0:03:28.120 --> 0:03:32.200
<v Speaker 1>they give the player option at seventy five million guaranteed,

0:03:32.200 --> 0:03:34.960
<v Speaker 1>it suddenly becomes a more difficult contract to trade if

0:03:35.000 --> 0:03:37.720
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Kaminga doesn't look good for the first half of

0:03:37.760 --> 0:03:40.240
<v Speaker 1>the season, and anybody who wants to trade for them

0:03:40.280 --> 0:03:42.120
<v Speaker 1>now has to consider the fact that they could be

0:03:42.160 --> 0:03:46.960
<v Speaker 1>paying twenty five million dollars for Jonathan Kaminga three seasons

0:03:46.960 --> 0:03:50.000
<v Speaker 1>from now. That could affect his value, and that essentially

0:03:50.040 --> 0:03:53.240
<v Speaker 1>is the sticking point, and Kaminga's camp is basically looking

0:03:53.280 --> 0:03:55.280
<v Speaker 1>at it saying like, hey, if Josh Gidty can get

0:03:55.320 --> 0:03:57.480
<v Speaker 1>twenty five million for four years, this is a fair

0:03:57.520 --> 0:04:01.960
<v Speaker 1>price for Jonathan. Now my feeling on like the value

0:04:02.000 --> 0:04:06.680
<v Speaker 1>of the contract is complicated. Do I want Jonathan Kaminga

0:04:06.840 --> 0:04:10.920
<v Speaker 1>on my team at twenty five million per year if

0:04:11.000 --> 0:04:14.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to win the title this year? No, I

0:04:14.360 --> 0:04:16.480
<v Speaker 1>don't think he's in that phase of his career yet.

0:04:17.040 --> 0:04:19.279
<v Speaker 1>I don't think he's good enough in like a starring

0:04:19.400 --> 0:04:22.400
<v Speaker 1>role to justify the money, and I don't think he

0:04:22.440 --> 0:04:26.080
<v Speaker 1>can really focus his talents into a smaller role to

0:04:26.240 --> 0:04:29.640
<v Speaker 1>help a serious team win. Yet. Now, would I take

0:04:29.720 --> 0:04:32.000
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Kaminga on my team for twenty five million a

0:04:32.080 --> 0:04:34.200
<v Speaker 1>year if I was in the middle of a rebuild

0:04:34.760 --> 0:04:37.640
<v Speaker 1>and I was like actively hunting for talent to build

0:04:37.680 --> 0:04:41.320
<v Speaker 1>around for the future, Yeah, I would. Let's take Josh

0:04:41.400 --> 0:04:44.880
<v Speaker 1>Gittty for example. I think Josh Getty's an intriguing player.

0:04:45.440 --> 0:04:48.800
<v Speaker 1>He's improved substantially as a three point shooter. I think

0:04:48.800 --> 0:04:51.400
<v Speaker 1>he's like a decent half court shot creator, just big

0:04:51.440 --> 0:04:55.039
<v Speaker 1>guard who can create advantages for his team. But I

0:04:55.080 --> 0:04:57.400
<v Speaker 1>also don't think that a team that's gonna pay Josh

0:04:57.400 --> 0:05:00.080
<v Speaker 1>Gitty twenty five million per year and to put the

0:05:00.080 --> 0:05:03.800
<v Speaker 1>ball in his hands essentially as a number one option

0:05:04.200 --> 0:05:06.320
<v Speaker 1>or number two option, I don't think that team's gonna

0:05:06.320 --> 0:05:09.240
<v Speaker 1>be competing for a title. I don't think Josh Gitty

0:05:09.320 --> 0:05:15.080
<v Speaker 1>has a ton of like untapped upside right like, I

0:05:15.120 --> 0:05:18.640
<v Speaker 1>don't think he's got the potential to become Luca Light

0:05:19.400 --> 0:05:21.159
<v Speaker 1>in five years. I don't. I don't think that's in

0:05:21.200 --> 0:05:23.200
<v Speaker 1>the cards for Josh Gitty. And so that's just too

0:05:23.240 --> 0:05:26.040
<v Speaker 1>much salary to tie up in a player who's at

0:05:26.080 --> 0:05:28.120
<v Speaker 1>his best with the ball in his hands, but just

0:05:28.160 --> 0:05:30.400
<v Speaker 1>not nearly as good as the other guys who will

0:05:30.400 --> 0:05:33.000
<v Speaker 1>have the ball in their hands around the league in

0:05:33.160 --> 0:05:36.640
<v Speaker 1>high volume. Last year, despite the flashes that he showed,

0:05:36.680 --> 0:05:39.279
<v Speaker 1>Josh Gutty was less than a point per possession including

0:05:39.279 --> 0:05:42.680
<v Speaker 1>passes in pick and roll in like over six hundred reps.

0:05:42.920 --> 0:05:47.800
<v Speaker 1>He's not flashing some serious, untapped, like all NBA ball

0:05:47.839 --> 0:05:51.720
<v Speaker 1>handler upside. So even if we think Josh Gitty might

0:05:51.720 --> 0:05:55.279
<v Speaker 1>be a better player than Jonathan Kminga right now, I

0:05:55.400 --> 0:06:00.520
<v Speaker 1>actually do think Jonathan Kaminga has real untapped upside I

0:06:00.520 --> 0:06:02.760
<v Speaker 1>don't think he's gonna be an All NBA player or anything.

0:06:03.000 --> 0:06:05.280
<v Speaker 1>That seems to be a long shot at this point,

0:06:05.560 --> 0:06:07.520
<v Speaker 1>but I do think he could make an All Star

0:06:07.560 --> 0:06:11.600
<v Speaker 1>team or two. In fact, like if I was stuck

0:06:11.720 --> 0:06:15.680
<v Speaker 1>in basketball purgatory the way the Chicago Bulls are, I

0:06:15.720 --> 0:06:18.680
<v Speaker 1>would rather be taking my chances with a guy like Kaminga.

0:06:18.720 --> 0:06:21.360
<v Speaker 1>Give him the ball a ton, you won't be as

0:06:21.400 --> 0:06:23.279
<v Speaker 1>good in the short term, but let's see how he

0:06:23.320 --> 0:06:26.760
<v Speaker 1>can develop. Let's see if he becomes a player that

0:06:26.800 --> 0:06:29.200
<v Speaker 1>can make an All Star team. He's got upside. I

0:06:29.240 --> 0:06:31.840
<v Speaker 1>think there's actually value there. So to be clear, like

0:06:31.880 --> 0:06:35.000
<v Speaker 1>if I was in a position where I was rebuilding,

0:06:35.480 --> 0:06:38.720
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a fair contract price for a guy

0:06:38.760 --> 0:06:43.840
<v Speaker 1>like Jonathan Kaminga. The problem is, there was no obvious

0:06:43.880 --> 0:06:46.760
<v Speaker 1>team this summer that had the cap space for Johnathan

0:06:46.800 --> 0:06:49.719
<v Speaker 1>Kaminga and had that type of role available, And the

0:06:49.760 --> 0:06:53.520
<v Speaker 1>Warriors don't have that type of role available. So now

0:06:53.560 --> 0:06:54.920
<v Speaker 1>the Warriors are in a buy. They either have to

0:06:55.000 --> 0:06:59.479
<v Speaker 1>risk signing Kaminga into that type of salary slot, or

0:06:59.480 --> 0:07:02.200
<v Speaker 1>they have to try rate him back and take similarly

0:07:02.279 --> 0:07:06.279
<v Speaker 1>flawed salary, and it appears that they're not willing to

0:07:06.320 --> 0:07:09.120
<v Speaker 1>do so. All we've all heard they don't want Malik Monk.

0:07:10.480 --> 0:07:12.320
<v Speaker 1>I like Malink. I think he'd be a good fit

0:07:12.360 --> 0:07:14.880
<v Speaker 1>in the Golden State system. Like they need scoring pop,

0:07:14.920 --> 0:07:17.800
<v Speaker 1>they need guys who can like really be dynamic coming

0:07:17.840 --> 0:07:19.800
<v Speaker 1>off of dribble handoffs. I think a guy like Malik

0:07:19.840 --> 0:07:22.000
<v Speaker 1>Monk could do that. But he's got another sixty million

0:07:22.000 --> 0:07:24.440
<v Speaker 1>dollars on his deal and the Warriors don't want to

0:07:24.440 --> 0:07:27.200
<v Speaker 1>take that on. And this is where I think the

0:07:27.200 --> 0:07:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Warriors need a little bit of a reality check. Even

0:07:31.040 --> 0:07:33.640
<v Speaker 1>if you signed Jonathan Kaminga to a team friendly deal,

0:07:33.640 --> 0:07:36.000
<v Speaker 1>like what's let's say that Kaminga accepted their first offer,

0:07:36.000 --> 0:07:38.680
<v Speaker 1>which the reports said were like two for forty, so

0:07:39.080 --> 0:07:41.080
<v Speaker 1>twenty million per for two years, and that's not even

0:07:41.120 --> 0:07:43.000
<v Speaker 1>the offer anymore. The line has moved. The line has

0:07:43.040 --> 0:07:46.520
<v Speaker 1>moved to two for fifty, essentially with that team option

0:07:46.640 --> 0:07:49.120
<v Speaker 1>on the back end. But like, even if he even

0:07:49.120 --> 0:07:50.960
<v Speaker 1>if you did sign him at two for forty, it's

0:07:51.000 --> 0:07:54.000
<v Speaker 1>not like Kaminga is gonna suddenly become some massively valuable

0:07:54.040 --> 0:07:57.000
<v Speaker 1>asset that's going to return a haul in a trade,

0:07:57.520 --> 0:08:01.640
<v Speaker 1>like a bunch of good players and picks. Kaminga on

0:08:01.800 --> 0:08:05.600
<v Speaker 1>his new deal, regardless of whether the Warriors signed him

0:08:05.600 --> 0:08:08.200
<v Speaker 1>to it or someone else signs him to it. It's

0:08:08.240 --> 0:08:11.480
<v Speaker 1>somewhat risky because it's going to be twenty plus million

0:08:11.560 --> 0:08:15.200
<v Speaker 1>with multiple years for a young player that right now

0:08:15.240 --> 0:08:17.920
<v Speaker 1>isn't very good, but that has a lot of upside,

0:08:17.920 --> 0:08:21.720
<v Speaker 1>that has talent. He's flawed, though, there is risk there

0:08:22.560 --> 0:08:26.120
<v Speaker 1>no matter what when you're taking a large salary slot

0:08:27.080 --> 0:08:29.120
<v Speaker 1>like yeah, So Malik Monk to me is just a

0:08:29.160 --> 0:08:31.160
<v Speaker 1>similar type of risk. It's a little different in the

0:08:31.200 --> 0:08:33.559
<v Speaker 1>sense that he's older and he's more of a known commodity.

0:08:33.600 --> 0:08:37.080
<v Speaker 1>But Malik Monk right now can do more for the

0:08:37.120 --> 0:08:41.400
<v Speaker 1>Warriors than Jonathan Kaminga can. So he's a risky contract

0:08:41.600 --> 0:08:46.280
<v Speaker 1>with real value in the immediate future, as opposed to

0:08:46.320 --> 0:08:49.320
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Minga, who if you did happen to get on

0:08:49.360 --> 0:08:51.720
<v Speaker 1>a deal like that, is also going to tie up

0:08:51.720 --> 0:08:54.840
<v Speaker 1>your books for multiple years and has more risk. And

0:08:54.880 --> 0:08:56.480
<v Speaker 1>there's a version of this where he's not even in

0:08:56.520 --> 0:08:59.520
<v Speaker 1>your rotation when things matter. We know, we just saw

0:08:59.559 --> 0:09:01.760
<v Speaker 1>that last year when you threw him on the court

0:09:01.800 --> 0:09:05.200
<v Speaker 1>after Steph Curry got hurt. So essentially what I'm saying

0:09:05.280 --> 0:09:10.959
<v Speaker 1>is Kaminga's value is Kaminga's value right now? It's Malik

0:09:11.080 --> 0:09:15.960
<v Speaker 1>Monk and a protected first round pick. I don't think

0:09:16.320 --> 0:09:19.160
<v Speaker 1>that if you somehow signed Jonathan Kaminga to a team

0:09:19.240 --> 0:09:21.360
<v Speaker 1>friendly deal, like let's say you get him on that

0:09:21.520 --> 0:09:23.480
<v Speaker 1>deal that you're offering the two plus one with the

0:09:23.520 --> 0:09:26.120
<v Speaker 1>team option. I don't think he's suddenly going to pull

0:09:26.200 --> 0:09:30.560
<v Speaker 1>back some awesome young player and an unprotected first round pick.

0:09:31.600 --> 0:09:34.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't think he's going not unless you somehow manage

0:09:34.640 --> 0:09:37.360
<v Speaker 1>to rehab his value. And we just have such a

0:09:37.640 --> 0:09:41.320
<v Speaker 1>large sample size now of him being a clearly clunky

0:09:41.320 --> 0:09:45.839
<v Speaker 1>fit with the team. Like I've heard the Warriors want

0:09:45.920 --> 0:09:48.640
<v Speaker 1>Keegan Murray in the deal. Why would the Kings do that.

0:09:48.720 --> 0:09:52.840
<v Speaker 1>Keegan's a much better player than Jonathan Kaminga. That's a

0:09:52.880 --> 0:09:55.440
<v Speaker 1>different class of asset that you would be bringing back

0:09:55.440 --> 0:09:59.160
<v Speaker 1>in a deal like that. Your chance to turn Jonathan

0:09:59.200 --> 0:10:03.959
<v Speaker 1>Kamina into real asset return was two years ago, when

0:10:04.000 --> 0:10:07.720
<v Speaker 1>he was still on his rookie contract with multiple years remaining,

0:10:08.640 --> 0:10:13.280
<v Speaker 1>with more of an unknown regarding his upside, and you

0:10:13.320 --> 0:10:16.400
<v Speaker 1>were much more likely to get something like a really

0:10:16.440 --> 0:10:19.920
<v Speaker 1>good young player and a unprotected first round pick for

0:10:20.040 --> 0:10:24.520
<v Speaker 1>jk that time has passed. He's no longer a high

0:10:24.600 --> 0:10:27.720
<v Speaker 1>value asset. He's gonna be making twenty plus million in

0:10:27.760 --> 0:10:32.520
<v Speaker 1>the future. So my thing is, like I would have

0:10:32.600 --> 0:10:36.319
<v Speaker 1>just taken them Elik Monk deal. I think he addresses

0:10:36.360 --> 0:10:42.360
<v Speaker 1>a legitimate need with that scoring pop. He's already been

0:10:42.800 --> 0:10:45.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of functioning in a five out offense with a

0:10:45.760 --> 0:10:49.839
<v Speaker 1>passing folkrum big like Demanta Sabonis. You have a track

0:10:49.880 --> 0:10:53.240
<v Speaker 1>record as the Warriors of turning like mediocre defensive guards

0:10:53.240 --> 0:10:55.079
<v Speaker 1>into guys that can fill a role like I thought

0:10:55.120 --> 0:11:00.720
<v Speaker 1>Buddy Yield was fine defensively last year. Monk's a better

0:11:00.760 --> 0:11:04.920
<v Speaker 1>player than him. You have a specific need for more

0:11:05.000 --> 0:11:08.200
<v Speaker 1>dynamic play at the guard spot in your rotation. He

0:11:08.240 --> 0:11:11.199
<v Speaker 1>brings athleticism. I think he's a look. I rooted for

0:11:11.280 --> 0:11:13.400
<v Speaker 1>him when he was with the Lakers. The dude's competitive,

0:11:14.160 --> 0:11:17.160
<v Speaker 1>he plays hard. He's not perfect, He's got his flaws.

0:11:17.720 --> 0:11:21.199
<v Speaker 1>He's small on defense, he can be a little helter skelter,

0:11:21.280 --> 0:11:23.160
<v Speaker 1>and he can get out of position sometimes. But again,

0:11:23.200 --> 0:11:26.680
<v Speaker 1>you're bringing him into a much smarter organization than where

0:11:26.720 --> 0:11:31.120
<v Speaker 1>he's been in years past. And I get it. It's

0:11:31.160 --> 0:11:34.720
<v Speaker 1>a protected first round pick, and those aren't worth as

0:11:34.760 --> 0:11:37.720
<v Speaker 1>much as they used to be, but it's still a

0:11:37.760 --> 0:11:41.839
<v Speaker 1>positive asset. You're turning Kaminga into a player that can

0:11:41.880 --> 0:11:45.319
<v Speaker 1>help you in the short term. Yeah, Okay, Malik Monk's

0:11:45.360 --> 0:11:47.040
<v Speaker 1>got twenty million on the books. Three years from now,

0:11:47.040 --> 0:11:49.320
<v Speaker 1>who cares. You're most likely blowing the team up at

0:11:49.360 --> 0:11:52.600
<v Speaker 1>that point. This this feels like very much like a

0:11:52.600 --> 0:11:55.560
<v Speaker 1>two year window where you're trying to make this happen

0:11:57.679 --> 0:11:59.719
<v Speaker 1>and you get a positive asset in the form of

0:12:00.280 --> 0:12:02.959
<v Speaker 1>pick that you can then either package in the middle

0:12:02.960 --> 0:12:04.920
<v Speaker 1>of the season for an all in type of move

0:12:05.280 --> 0:12:09.760
<v Speaker 1>or you can hold for the future rebuild. I just

0:12:09.920 --> 0:12:13.080
<v Speaker 1>don't think they're gonna get more down the line. I

0:12:13.080 --> 0:12:18.280
<v Speaker 1>don't think there's some substantially better offer in February, So

0:12:18.360 --> 0:12:21.040
<v Speaker 1>you might as well go into camp with your roster set,

0:12:22.080 --> 0:12:24.120
<v Speaker 1>give him a league Monk, a chance to really learn

0:12:24.160 --> 0:12:30.319
<v Speaker 1>the system, give him a full training camp. But I mean,

0:12:30.360 --> 0:12:33.200
<v Speaker 1>all indications are that that deal is dead on the

0:12:33.200 --> 0:12:38.520
<v Speaker 1>Warriors front. They either want the pick protections removed or

0:12:38.559 --> 0:12:42.319
<v Speaker 1>they want a better player in, like a guy like

0:12:42.400 --> 0:12:45.680
<v Speaker 1>Keegan Murray. And so it just feels like the latest

0:12:45.679 --> 0:12:49.520
<v Speaker 1>example of the Warriors passing the buck on these young

0:12:49.559 --> 0:12:52.280
<v Speaker 1>players on the situation with these young players, which is

0:12:52.320 --> 0:12:55.200
<v Speaker 1>something they've been doing for years now in this era,

0:12:55.880 --> 0:12:58.280
<v Speaker 1>and it's just unfortunate because it just feels foolish for

0:12:58.360 --> 0:13:02.600
<v Speaker 1>everybody involved now. And honestly, like, even if the Warriors

0:13:02.600 --> 0:13:04.880
<v Speaker 1>do somehow, let's say they flip it to a player

0:13:04.920 --> 0:13:08.280
<v Speaker 1>option and you give Kaminga the three for seventy five,

0:13:09.360 --> 0:13:11.840
<v Speaker 1>it's just gonna be the exact same situation this year,

0:13:12.120 --> 0:13:14.760
<v Speaker 1>him being a clunky fit in and out of the rotation,

0:13:15.800 --> 0:13:18.920
<v Speaker 1>weak trade offers coming in return that involves some sort

0:13:18.960 --> 0:13:22.040
<v Speaker 1>of flawed player coming back and some sort of protected

0:13:22.120 --> 0:13:27.199
<v Speaker 1>draft asset. I think there's just a little bit of

0:13:27.240 --> 0:13:29.720
<v Speaker 1>a reality check that Golden State needs at this point.

0:13:31.040 --> 0:13:32.680
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's get to some mailback questions and then

0:13:32.679 --> 0:13:35.719
<v Speaker 1>we'll get out of here for today. Today's show is

0:13:35.720 --> 0:13:38.360
<v Speaker 1>brought to you by our new presenting sponsor, hard Rock Bet.

0:13:38.800 --> 0:13:41.000
<v Speaker 1>We're still a month away from basketball tip off, but

0:13:41.040 --> 0:13:44.079
<v Speaker 1>with hard Rock Bet, the action never stops. Haven't placed

0:13:44.080 --> 0:13:46.680
<v Speaker 1>your first bet yet, There's still time to score bet

0:13:46.720 --> 0:13:49.520
<v Speaker 1>five dollars and if it wins, you don't just get

0:13:49.559 --> 0:13:52.360
<v Speaker 1>your payout, you also cash in one hundred and fifty

0:13:52.400 --> 0:13:55.160
<v Speaker 1>dollars in bonus bets on top. If you don't want

0:13:55.160 --> 0:13:57.800
<v Speaker 1>to wait, you need more hoops in your life. NBA

0:13:57.960 --> 0:14:00.920
<v Speaker 1>futures are already live on hard Rock. You can bet

0:14:01.000 --> 0:14:04.120
<v Speaker 1>on the Finals, MVP, Rookie of the Year, six Man,

0:14:04.240 --> 0:14:06.480
<v Speaker 1>and a lot more. Open up the app to see

0:14:06.480 --> 0:14:09.040
<v Speaker 1>everything that's live and lock in today's odds if you

0:14:09.120 --> 0:14:11.480
<v Speaker 1>like what you see. And since it's Wednesday, if you're

0:14:11.520 --> 0:14:14.360
<v Speaker 1>already betting on the hard Rock Bet sportsbook app, you

0:14:14.360 --> 0:14:16.560
<v Speaker 1>know what that means. It's the last day to use

0:14:16.600 --> 0:14:19.640
<v Speaker 1>your legendary rewards drops. Open up the app today you

0:14:19.640 --> 0:14:21.800
<v Speaker 1>could have a bonus bet or who knows what's in there?

0:14:22.200 --> 0:14:25.680
<v Speaker 1>More drops every Thursday. The rewards and promos are NonStop.

0:14:26.040 --> 0:14:28.240
<v Speaker 1>Download the hard Rock Bet app today and make your

0:14:28.240 --> 0:14:31.480
<v Speaker 1>first deposit payable and bonus bets not a cash offer

0:14:31.720 --> 0:14:34.520
<v Speaker 1>offered by the Seminal Tribe of Florida in Florida, offered

0:14:34.520 --> 0:14:37.520
<v Speaker 1>by the Seminal hard Rock Digital LLC in all other states.

0:14:38.080 --> 0:14:43.120
<v Speaker 1>Must be twenty one plus and physically present in Arizona, Colorado, Florida, Illinois, Indiana,

0:14:43.160 --> 0:14:46.520
<v Speaker 1>New Jersey, Ohio, Tennessee, or Virginia to play. Terms and

0:14:46.520 --> 0:14:50.000
<v Speaker 1>conditions apply. Concerned about gambling in Florida, call one eight

0:14:50.080 --> 0:14:53.840
<v Speaker 1>eight eight Admit it. In Indiana. If you or someone

0:14:53.920 --> 0:14:56.280
<v Speaker 1>you know has a gambling problem and wants help, call

0:14:56.320 --> 0:14:59.880
<v Speaker 1>one eight hundred and nine with it. Gambling problem called

0:15:00.000 --> 0:15:04.480
<v Speaker 1>one eight hundred gambler in Arizona, Colorado, Illinois, New Jersey, Ohio, Tennessee,

0:15:04.640 --> 0:15:10.280
<v Speaker 1>or Virginia. Simple question, what's the highest you could see

0:15:10.360 --> 0:15:13.360
<v Speaker 1>jokics climb all time? Such a tough guy to put

0:15:13.400 --> 0:15:15.840
<v Speaker 1>up against other all timers, particularly bigs, because of his

0:15:15.960 --> 0:15:18.560
<v Speaker 1>lack of rim protection as a center. Sometimes I feel

0:15:18.560 --> 0:15:21.120
<v Speaker 1>you're almost better off not judging him as a big,

0:15:21.440 --> 0:15:23.280
<v Speaker 1>But I truly think he finished his top ten all time.

0:15:23.360 --> 0:15:24.760
<v Speaker 1>Keep up the good work, Jason, love the show. Thank

0:15:24.760 --> 0:15:26.800
<v Speaker 1>you so much for the kind words. I think the

0:15:26.840 --> 0:15:29.120
<v Speaker 1>point you're making about him being viewed as a center

0:15:29.200 --> 0:15:33.160
<v Speaker 1>is very interesting because it's not so much that I

0:15:33.240 --> 0:15:35.960
<v Speaker 1>don't judge him as a big as it is that

0:15:36.000 --> 0:15:39.920
<v Speaker 1>I just judge him more as an offensive engine. Right Like,

0:15:40.280 --> 0:15:43.040
<v Speaker 1>for instance, when you're talking about Larry Bird all Time.

0:15:43.320 --> 0:15:46.160
<v Speaker 1>Larry Bird was a guy who certainly wasn't a bad

0:15:46.200 --> 0:15:50.080
<v Speaker 1>defensive player, but he was known for being the offensive

0:15:50.080 --> 0:15:54.800
<v Speaker 1>engine of the Boston Celtics. Whereas you look at the

0:15:56.480 --> 0:15:59.040
<v Speaker 1>centers in the all time list, the Chema lodged One's

0:15:59.080 --> 0:16:01.480
<v Speaker 1>Bill Russell. When you're looking at those guys, you're looking

0:16:01.520 --> 0:16:05.040
<v Speaker 1>at them as defensive fulcrums, which obviously Jokic is not.

0:16:05.800 --> 0:16:07.680
<v Speaker 1>But as we've talked about, like Steph Curry, for me,

0:16:07.800 --> 0:16:09.880
<v Speaker 1>ranks really high. I think he's the fifth best perimeter

0:16:09.960 --> 0:16:12.360
<v Speaker 1>player of all time, somewhere in the back half of

0:16:12.400 --> 0:16:15.040
<v Speaker 1>the top ten if you include centers. Steph is really

0:16:15.120 --> 0:16:16.720
<v Speaker 1>high for me. And that's not a guy that you're

0:16:16.760 --> 0:16:21.320
<v Speaker 1>anchoring a defense around. So like I see, Jokic is

0:16:21.360 --> 0:16:23.480
<v Speaker 1>fitting more than mold of Steph as like a guy

0:16:23.520 --> 0:16:25.480
<v Speaker 1>that you're putting on the list as one of the

0:16:25.640 --> 0:16:29.080
<v Speaker 1>great offensive players to ever play the game. I think

0:16:29.080 --> 0:16:32.160
<v Speaker 1>he's personally the best offensive player I've ever seen play

0:16:32.160 --> 0:16:35.520
<v Speaker 1>the game. The problem is with the top ten lists

0:16:35.600 --> 0:16:39.280
<v Speaker 1>or all time lists, is you're running into some insane resumes.

0:16:41.360 --> 0:16:45.520
<v Speaker 1>You talk about Lebron with four championships, Michael Jordan with

0:16:45.560 --> 0:16:48.560
<v Speaker 1>six championships. You talked about Kobe, Like when you start

0:16:48.600 --> 0:16:51.080
<v Speaker 1>to look at Kobe's resume, and I think he's just

0:16:51.120 --> 0:16:53.760
<v Speaker 1>become a profoundly underrated player over time. The dude's won

0:16:53.880 --> 0:16:56.760
<v Speaker 1>five titles and like, okay, yeah he won three. With Shaq,

0:16:56.960 --> 0:16:59.480
<v Speaker 1>he won two in a row. How many players in

0:16:59.560 --> 0:17:02.880
<v Speaker 1>NBA his have won multiple consecutive championships. That's a real

0:17:02.920 --> 0:17:09.320
<v Speaker 1>accomplishment on that resume. You look at Steph with with

0:17:09.520 --> 0:17:12.640
<v Speaker 1>his four championships, you look at Larry Bird with his three,

0:17:12.640 --> 0:17:15.240
<v Speaker 1>you look at Magic Johnson with his five. You're running

0:17:15.240 --> 0:17:18.520
<v Speaker 1>into these crazy lists. The Chema Lagoon in the middle

0:17:18.560 --> 0:17:21.760
<v Speaker 1>of the nineties, rips off back to back championships, looks

0:17:21.760 --> 0:17:23.560
<v Speaker 1>like the best player in the league a couple of

0:17:23.600 --> 0:17:26.320
<v Speaker 1>years in a row. It's just the resumes get so

0:17:26.520 --> 0:17:29.600
<v Speaker 1>insane that it feels like it's going to be tough

0:17:29.640 --> 0:17:31.760
<v Speaker 1>for Jokic to move too much higher. Now, do I

0:17:31.800 --> 0:17:33.720
<v Speaker 1>think that you have to look at it in terms

0:17:33.760 --> 0:17:37.120
<v Speaker 1>of just counting championships? Of course not. It's way more

0:17:37.160 --> 0:17:39.960
<v Speaker 1>complicated than that. The game of basketball is way more

0:17:39.960 --> 0:17:43.240
<v Speaker 1>complicated than that. But in order for Jokic to get

0:17:43.240 --> 0:17:46.880
<v Speaker 1>into that top ten and to really entrench himself there,

0:17:46.960 --> 0:17:50.639
<v Speaker 1>I think he's gonna have to win two more And like,

0:17:50.720 --> 0:17:54.120
<v Speaker 1>it's just feels like a pretty short window for the Nuggets,

0:17:54.200 --> 0:17:56.960
<v Speaker 1>right now, you'd have to win this year and probably

0:17:57.000 --> 0:17:59.639
<v Speaker 1>within the following two years after that, and that's just

0:17:59.680 --> 0:18:01.439
<v Speaker 1>a lot to ask, So, like, do I think he

0:18:01.480 --> 0:18:04.080
<v Speaker 1>has that potential? Certainly I could. Could I see universe

0:18:04.080 --> 0:18:06.600
<v Speaker 1>where Yokich wins the next two championships? Of course he can.

0:18:07.920 --> 0:18:10.360
<v Speaker 1>It's just really hard. The league is super deep, there's

0:18:10.400 --> 0:18:13.000
<v Speaker 1>all these young players coming up, there's so many good

0:18:13.000 --> 0:18:17.320
<v Speaker 1>teams right now. So it's just it feels to me

0:18:17.520 --> 0:18:20.000
<v Speaker 1>like a long shot that he actually gets into the

0:18:20.040 --> 0:18:22.560
<v Speaker 1>top ten because of the strength of the resumes that

0:18:22.560 --> 0:18:24.800
<v Speaker 1>he'll have to cross in order to get there. But

0:18:24.920 --> 0:18:27.760
<v Speaker 1>certainly it's a possibility. It's just you start looking up,

0:18:27.800 --> 0:18:29.280
<v Speaker 1>you start looking at the guys at the top of

0:18:29.320 --> 0:18:31.359
<v Speaker 1>that list, and it's just an insane set of talent

0:18:31.440 --> 0:18:35.359
<v Speaker 1>that accomplished a lot in this league. Next question more

0:18:35.359 --> 0:18:37.439
<v Speaker 1>of a philosophical one here, Jason. You obviously have a

0:18:37.440 --> 0:18:40.280
<v Speaker 1>pension for offensive gurus and orchestrators like Luka and Jokic

0:18:40.400 --> 0:18:42.800
<v Speaker 1>over high level scorers, and that's fine, but don't forget

0:18:42.800 --> 0:18:44.680
<v Speaker 1>the last two champions were led by players that were

0:18:44.720 --> 0:18:48.040
<v Speaker 1>distinctly not offensive hubs, but were excellent at what they did.

0:18:48.280 --> 0:18:51.200
<v Speaker 1>Shay and tatem And before Jokic and twenty three, and

0:18:51.280 --> 0:18:54.320
<v Speaker 1>both Giannis and Kawhi led their teams to championships also

0:18:54.400 --> 0:18:57.440
<v Speaker 1>without being offensive hubs. Could there be an actual ceiling

0:18:57.480 --> 0:18:59.879
<v Speaker 1>for teams which are led by do it all offensive hubs.

0:19:00.320 --> 0:19:04.720
<v Speaker 1>So here's the thing. When I'm talking about the foundational

0:19:04.840 --> 0:19:07.840
<v Speaker 1>player that you're building a team around, we're talking about

0:19:07.880 --> 0:19:14.199
<v Speaker 1>it within the context of starting from scratch. Ultimately, basketball

0:19:14.280 --> 0:19:17.800
<v Speaker 1>is a team sport, and as you start to look

0:19:17.880 --> 0:19:24.160
<v Speaker 1>through those situations, they were kind of roster abnormalities, right

0:19:24.640 --> 0:19:28.679
<v Speaker 1>Like Kawhi Entard won the title with the twenty nineteen

0:19:28.800 --> 0:19:33.399
<v Speaker 1>Raptors because they were a team that literally was ripping

0:19:33.480 --> 0:19:38.000
<v Speaker 1>off sixty win seasons with Demarta Rosen as their best player.

0:19:39.600 --> 0:19:44.480
<v Speaker 1>They successfully flip for Kawhi, and Kawhi is able to

0:19:44.520 --> 0:19:47.600
<v Speaker 1>push them over the top into winning the championship. That

0:19:47.760 --> 0:19:51.640
<v Speaker 1>is not starting with Kawhi and then building a championship

0:19:51.640 --> 0:19:54.920
<v Speaker 1>team around him. He was effectively a mercenary that became

0:19:55.000 --> 0:19:57.760
<v Speaker 1>the tip of the spear and helped them win the

0:19:57.800 --> 0:20:02.240
<v Speaker 1>title Oklahoma City. He has an insane amount of talent

0:20:02.359 --> 0:20:05.000
<v Speaker 1>because they were a beneficiary of one of the most

0:20:05.040 --> 0:20:08.680
<v Speaker 1>lopside in retrospect lopsided trades in NBA history. At the time,

0:20:08.720 --> 0:20:11.199
<v Speaker 1>obviously it felt normal, but as we look back, you

0:20:11.240 --> 0:20:13.639
<v Speaker 1>look at they got the better player in the trade

0:20:13.680 --> 0:20:16.439
<v Speaker 1>and an insane amount of draft assets that has allowed

0:20:16.440 --> 0:20:20.359
<v Speaker 1>them to pile up an insane amount of uniquely talented

0:20:20.359 --> 0:20:25.080
<v Speaker 1>players that you don't typically see on a roster. Shake

0:20:25.119 --> 0:20:29.400
<v Speaker 1>Gilders Alexander has pushed them over the top into being champions.

0:20:29.840 --> 0:20:34.520
<v Speaker 1>But that is a unique roster situation. When I'm talking about,

0:20:34.720 --> 0:20:37.520
<v Speaker 1>like in Boston, sane thing, like they literally had five

0:20:37.680 --> 0:20:40.879
<v Speaker 1>players who on the open market would fetch north of

0:20:40.920 --> 0:20:45.480
<v Speaker 1>thirty million dollars a year. So yes, you can't. You

0:20:45.520 --> 0:20:50.280
<v Speaker 1>can win a championship with any archetype of player, but

0:20:50.560 --> 0:20:55.920
<v Speaker 1>if I'm starting from scratch in a vacuum, I want

0:20:55.920 --> 0:20:59.159
<v Speaker 1>to have it be a player that is easiest to

0:20:59.280 --> 0:21:02.919
<v Speaker 1>build around and for me if I am for me,

0:21:03.400 --> 0:21:06.880
<v Speaker 1>Like one of my overarching basketball philosophies is that offense

0:21:07.000 --> 0:21:12.960
<v Speaker 1>flows down from advantage creation. Defense flows down, and you

0:21:13.040 --> 0:21:16.920
<v Speaker 1>obviously need defensive talent, but defensive defense has a lot

0:21:16.960 --> 0:21:18.760
<v Speaker 1>to do with coaching. Defense has a lot to do

0:21:18.840 --> 0:21:20.840
<v Speaker 1>with buy in. Defense has a lot to do with

0:21:21.320 --> 0:21:24.720
<v Speaker 1>individual players from the start of the season, building connectivity

0:21:24.760 --> 0:21:28.320
<v Speaker 1>in their defensive rotations. We have seen so many examples

0:21:28.800 --> 0:21:34.280
<v Speaker 1>of teams with mediocre defensive talent win the title because

0:21:34.320 --> 0:21:38.840
<v Speaker 1>they came together, like the twenty sixteen Calves for example,

0:21:39.119 --> 0:21:42.959
<v Speaker 1>or the twenty twenty three Nuggets. We've seen that done.

0:21:43.040 --> 0:21:47.199
<v Speaker 1>But to me, offense flows down from advantage creation, and

0:21:47.280 --> 0:21:50.520
<v Speaker 1>so for me, if I'm starting from scratch, I think

0:21:50.600 --> 0:21:56.600
<v Speaker 1>it's easiest to build a championship level roster around a

0:21:56.920 --> 0:22:01.920
<v Speaker 1>top end offensive initiator. But that's just my basketball philosophy.

0:22:01.960 --> 0:22:04.880
<v Speaker 1>And again, like again, essentially, what I'm saying is like, yeah,

0:22:04.880 --> 0:22:07.480
<v Speaker 1>if we start looking at individual situations, like yeah, like

0:22:07.520 --> 0:22:12.119
<v Speaker 1>if the Toronto Raptors would have traded Demarta Rosen and

0:22:12.160 --> 0:22:15.560
<v Speaker 1>got back Luka Doncicic right now, I also think they

0:22:15.560 --> 0:22:18.840
<v Speaker 1>win the title. I literally said in our player rankings

0:22:18.840 --> 0:22:20.760
<v Speaker 1>that if you took this version of Luca, the one

0:22:20.800 --> 0:22:23.600
<v Speaker 1>we saw in EuroBasket and dropped it on last year's

0:22:23.640 --> 0:22:25.440
<v Speaker 1>thunder team, I think they win the title. And I

0:22:25.480 --> 0:22:29.400
<v Speaker 1>think they win it more easily, especially in the playoff runt.

0:22:30.440 --> 0:22:32.160
<v Speaker 1>So the point I'm trying to make is like, yeah,

0:22:32.320 --> 0:22:37.360
<v Speaker 1>we as we look at individual situations, and individual situations

0:22:37.359 --> 0:22:40.800
<v Speaker 1>that led to massive accumulations of talent. You can win

0:22:40.880 --> 0:22:44.119
<v Speaker 1>with any type of best player, but if I'm starting

0:22:44.160 --> 0:22:47.000
<v Speaker 1>from scratch in a vacuum, I believe it is easiest

0:22:47.400 --> 0:22:50.840
<v Speaker 1>to build a championship team around a supreme offensive engine,

0:22:50.840 --> 0:22:54.119
<v Speaker 1>because from there I have the flexibility to bring in

0:22:54.200 --> 0:22:58.439
<v Speaker 1>defensive players that play well with an advantage. Like a

0:22:58.440 --> 0:23:03.959
<v Speaker 1>lot of guys who can do jobs on defense but

0:23:04.119 --> 0:23:08.000
<v Speaker 1>struggle with offense. But the job is so easy for

0:23:08.080 --> 0:23:11.760
<v Speaker 1>them because they're playing with such insane advantages that they

0:23:11.800 --> 0:23:15.560
<v Speaker 1>become useful offensive players. I like my ability to build

0:23:15.560 --> 0:23:18.679
<v Speaker 1>around that type of player, versus if I have an

0:23:18.720 --> 0:23:22.160
<v Speaker 1>elite score, I now have to like figure out how

0:23:22.160 --> 0:23:25.439
<v Speaker 1>am I building the rest of the offense. Can I

0:23:25.520 --> 0:23:29.879
<v Speaker 1>play this flawed defensive player, this defensive minded player who

0:23:29.920 --> 0:23:32.560
<v Speaker 1>is flawed on offense. Can I play him alongside a

0:23:32.600 --> 0:23:35.040
<v Speaker 1>player that doesn't do a great job handling double teams

0:23:35.119 --> 0:23:37.520
<v Speaker 1>or that doesn't create a ton of advantages throughout the game.

0:23:38.080 --> 0:23:39.679
<v Speaker 1>I just think it's harder. By the way, I'm not

0:23:39.720 --> 0:23:41.760
<v Speaker 1>saying that there's some chasm. I'm not saying that like

0:23:42.000 --> 0:23:45.760
<v Speaker 1>it's offensive initiators and then everyone else sucks I'm just saying,

0:23:45.760 --> 0:23:49.480
<v Speaker 1>if I'm ranking the archetypes of players, I'm gonna go

0:23:49.600 --> 0:23:53.919
<v Speaker 1>with that advantage creating offensive engine type of offensive player.

0:23:54.480 --> 0:23:58.320
<v Speaker 1>Then probably the supreme two way score, then probably the

0:23:58.359 --> 0:24:01.520
<v Speaker 1>defensive anchor big you know, that Anthony Davis type of player.

0:24:02.359 --> 0:24:05.960
<v Speaker 1>It's one of the big kind of like paths for

0:24:06.280 --> 0:24:08.639
<v Speaker 1>Victor winn Minyama and his development. Is he going to

0:24:08.680 --> 0:24:12.560
<v Speaker 1>become a supreme scorer? Is he going to just be

0:24:12.680 --> 0:24:15.959
<v Speaker 1>this like defensive hub who never really becomes the elite

0:24:15.960 --> 0:24:17.879
<v Speaker 1>scorer that he needs to be. That's going to be

0:24:17.960 --> 0:24:20.160
<v Speaker 1>a big part of what helps Victor women Yama reach

0:24:20.240 --> 0:24:23.200
<v Speaker 1>his ultimate potential. But for me, if I'm starting from

0:24:23.200 --> 0:24:25.760
<v Speaker 1>scratch in a vacuum, I want that offensive engine archetype.

0:24:27.720 --> 0:24:30.439
<v Speaker 1>A couple questions surrounding the top ten lists that we

0:24:30.440 --> 0:24:32.440
<v Speaker 1>did last week, Hi, Jason Huges Fan since like twenty

0:24:32.440 --> 0:24:34.560
<v Speaker 1>twenty three, is so, I'm curious to see your reasoning

0:24:34.600 --> 0:24:36.639
<v Speaker 1>and picking Shaq's two thousand and one playoff run over

0:24:36.640 --> 0:24:38.639
<v Speaker 1>his two thousand playoff runt. I can see why the

0:24:38.640 --> 0:24:40.159
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and one plaoff run can be picked, but

0:24:40.160 --> 0:24:41.600
<v Speaker 1>in my opinion, the two thousand and one is better

0:24:41.720 --> 0:24:43.920
<v Speaker 1>to start, the workload was drastically different, which was mostly

0:24:43.960 --> 0:24:46.240
<v Speaker 1>due to Kobe really coming into his own during the

0:24:46.280 --> 0:24:48.399
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and one playoffs. The usage right between the

0:24:48.440 --> 0:24:50.119
<v Speaker 1>two runs is mostly the same, but that leans to

0:24:50.119 --> 0:24:52.040
<v Speaker 1>two thousand, when he was able to win the title

0:24:52.119 --> 0:24:54.640
<v Speaker 1>while Kobe wasn't as reliable yet as a co star.

0:24:54.920 --> 0:24:57.560
<v Speaker 1>There were a legitimate slugfest series that Shack and probably

0:24:57.600 --> 0:24:59.600
<v Speaker 1>only Shaq could have bailed them out of. And I

0:24:59.640 --> 0:25:01.359
<v Speaker 1>can get behind the two thousand and one playoff run

0:25:01.440 --> 0:25:03.679
<v Speaker 1>being the better all time team, but in terms of

0:25:03.680 --> 0:25:05.800
<v Speaker 1>individual dominance, I think the two thousand Shack was a

0:25:05.800 --> 0:25:08.040
<v Speaker 1>smidge better, even if we're nitpicking at the end of

0:25:08.080 --> 0:25:10.240
<v Speaker 1>the day. Also, Shaq was scoring Champ and regular season

0:25:10.320 --> 0:25:13.000
<v Speaker 1>MVP during two thousand, which is not as important to me,

0:25:13.080 --> 0:25:16.040
<v Speaker 1>but still our nice notches to have. Thank you if

0:25:16.080 --> 0:25:19.040
<v Speaker 1>you read this. So here's the deal. I agree with

0:25:19.040 --> 0:25:21.560
<v Speaker 1>everything that you're saying. I do think that Shack in

0:25:21.600 --> 0:25:24.200
<v Speaker 1>that year two thousand season was just more locked in

0:25:24.280 --> 0:25:26.399
<v Speaker 1>from start to finish and was a better player, but

0:25:26.400 --> 0:25:30.159
<v Speaker 1>we were just operating within confines of that list. For me,

0:25:30.240 --> 0:25:32.440
<v Speaker 1>it was the last twenty five seasons, so that was

0:25:32.480 --> 0:25:35.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna be from two thousand and one to twenty twenty five.

0:25:35.000 --> 0:25:37.159
<v Speaker 1>We had similar examples, Like when we were talking about

0:25:38.000 --> 0:25:40.280
<v Speaker 1>I kind of like Jerry rigged the system a little

0:25:40.280 --> 0:25:44.200
<v Speaker 1>bit to fit to fit the Reggie Miller Pacers in there,

0:25:44.800 --> 0:25:47.960
<v Speaker 1>because I wanted to include that year two thousand run

0:25:47.960 --> 0:25:50.000
<v Speaker 1>as a run where they were pretty close. But it

0:25:50.040 --> 0:25:51.800
<v Speaker 1>was like kind of breaking the rules a little bit

0:25:51.840 --> 0:25:53.280
<v Speaker 1>because I was going from two thousand and one to

0:25:53.280 --> 0:25:56.640
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty five, So instead I highlighted the twenty fourteen

0:25:56.720 --> 0:25:58.879
<v Speaker 1>that came very close to beating the Pistons, right, So

0:25:58.960 --> 0:26:01.280
<v Speaker 1>like I was just kind of rating within those confines,

0:26:01.320 --> 0:26:03.280
<v Speaker 1>and to me, that two thousand and one team was

0:26:03.920 --> 0:26:06.400
<v Speaker 1>a reasonable way for me to capitalize on that within

0:26:06.440 --> 0:26:09.760
<v Speaker 1>the rules of the list. Last question, I had a

0:26:09.800 --> 0:26:12.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of people talking about how I forgot or didn't

0:26:12.520 --> 0:26:15.520
<v Speaker 1>have Kevin Garnett in my top Defenders list. It was

0:26:15.560 --> 0:26:18.520
<v Speaker 1>literally just accidental oversight I don't have. It wasn't like

0:26:18.600 --> 0:26:21.560
<v Speaker 1>I was trying to disrespect Kevin in any way. It's

0:26:21.600 --> 0:26:25.200
<v Speaker 1>just I'm piecing together five top ten lists and it's

0:26:25.200 --> 0:26:27.120
<v Speaker 1>just something slipped through the cracks. If you guys want

0:26:27.119 --> 0:26:29.440
<v Speaker 1>to hear my thoughts on KG and his defense and

0:26:29.480 --> 0:26:32.399
<v Speaker 1>his ceiling. I went over it pretty extensively in our

0:26:32.440 --> 0:26:35.720
<v Speaker 1>Top ten Peaks video, which Kevin Garnett did make on Monday.

0:26:35.800 --> 0:26:38.119
<v Speaker 1>So for all of you wondering why that happened, it

0:26:38.200 --> 0:26:40.639
<v Speaker 1>was literally just an accident on my part, just to

0:26:40.760 --> 0:26:43.280
<v Speaker 1>oversight something that slipped through the cracks. All right, guys,

0:26:43.280 --> 0:26:45.199
<v Speaker 1>it's all I have for today. There's always a sincerely

0:26:45.200 --> 0:26:47.480
<v Speaker 1>appreciate you guys for supporting us and supporting the show.

0:26:47.800 --> 0:26:49.879
<v Speaker 1>We'll be back later this week with another one of

0:26:49.880 --> 0:26:52.440
<v Speaker 1>those live streams on playback, as well as a video

0:26:52.560 --> 0:26:55.439
<v Speaker 1>talking about the Los Angeles Clippers and some more mailbag questions.

0:26:55.480 --> 0:26:56.400
<v Speaker 1>I will see you guys then