WEBVTT - #585 Packers Unscripted: Big weekend ahead

0:00:00.680 --> 0:00:14.880
<v Speaker 1>Hi, everybody. Welcome to another edition of Packers Unscripted from

0:00:14.880 --> 0:00:18.400
<v Speaker 1>Packers dot Com. I am Mike Spofford, joined as always

0:00:18.400 --> 0:00:21.720
<v Speaker 1>by my partner in crime, West Hodkowits were coming to

0:00:21.760 --> 0:00:26.880
<v Speaker 1>you from socially distant locations at lambeau Field West. As

0:00:26.880 --> 0:00:29.920
<v Speaker 1>we head into Super Bowl weekend, we are going to

0:00:30.000 --> 0:00:33.080
<v Speaker 1>find out on Saturday night. I'm assuming we are going

0:00:33.120 --> 0:00:36.440
<v Speaker 1>to find out on Saturday night that Packers quarterback Aaron

0:00:36.560 --> 0:00:41.159
<v Speaker 1>Rodgers will be a three time NFL Most Valuable Player

0:00:41.280 --> 0:00:45.800
<v Speaker 1>Award winner two thousand eleven, two thousand fourteen, and certainly

0:00:45.920 --> 0:00:48.840
<v Speaker 1>all all signs are pointing to him winning it again

0:00:48.880 --> 0:00:51.840
<v Speaker 1>in I'm just gonna throw an open ended question out

0:00:51.880 --> 0:00:56.520
<v Speaker 1>your way with regard to Rogers Place, specifically, when you

0:00:56.840 --> 0:01:00.840
<v Speaker 1>look back at the season, what will you remember most?

0:01:00.920 --> 0:01:03.360
<v Speaker 1>What stands out to you about it? Him playing on

0:01:03.440 --> 0:01:05.679
<v Speaker 1>time again is the number one thing. There were so

0:01:05.680 --> 0:01:08.280
<v Speaker 1>many years where between, and I think there was a

0:01:08.280 --> 0:01:10.680
<v Speaker 1>couple of different things in play. One he's talked it

0:01:10.800 --> 0:01:13.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot about is the the you know, him breaking

0:01:13.400 --> 0:01:16.199
<v Speaker 1>his leg and in eighteen and you know, the knee

0:01:16.240 --> 0:01:18.160
<v Speaker 1>injuries and everything else that he was dealing with. He

0:01:18.280 --> 0:01:20.880
<v Speaker 1>just he was still Aaron Rodgers. But it was kind

0:01:20.920 --> 0:01:23.600
<v Speaker 1>of like the wounded you know, Wolf, a little bit

0:01:23.720 --> 0:01:26.480
<v Speaker 1>like he just wasn't able to be what he always

0:01:26.480 --> 0:01:28.720
<v Speaker 1>has been because of some of the limitations that were

0:01:28.720 --> 0:01:30.920
<v Speaker 1>holding him back. But then I think there were also

0:01:31.000 --> 0:01:32.720
<v Speaker 1>certain things that he had to work his way out

0:01:32.720 --> 0:01:35.440
<v Speaker 1>of and he had to regain a comfort level, uh,

0:01:35.440 --> 0:01:38.080
<v Speaker 1>in the offense and being able to make this transition

0:01:38.080 --> 0:01:41.040
<v Speaker 1>from Matt Lafleur's scheme, from Mike McCarthy scheme to Matt

0:01:41.080 --> 0:01:43.520
<v Speaker 1>Lafleur's scheme and in the trend, the switch and the

0:01:43.560 --> 0:01:47.160
<v Speaker 1>maturation process you saw from nineteen to twenty. Uh, this

0:01:47.240 --> 0:01:49.280
<v Speaker 1>is the best player in the National Football League. And

0:01:49.840 --> 0:01:52.240
<v Speaker 1>for him to not only get the forty eight touchdown

0:01:52.320 --> 0:01:55.720
<v Speaker 1>passes and have a one passer rating point five, the

0:01:55.760 --> 0:01:58.960
<v Speaker 1>second best of his career. But Mike, that seventy point

0:01:59.040 --> 0:02:01.720
<v Speaker 1>seven completion percentage for a guy that was for so

0:02:01.840 --> 0:02:04.680
<v Speaker 1>long kind of aligned for throwing the ball away to

0:02:05.080 --> 0:02:08.280
<v Speaker 1>too much and you know, extending the plays when you know,

0:02:08.320 --> 0:02:11.400
<v Speaker 1>not being quick triggered. He played on time, as he

0:02:11.440 --> 0:02:14.840
<v Speaker 1>said in his appearance with Pat McAfee, he regained you know,

0:02:14.919 --> 0:02:17.480
<v Speaker 1>the confidence in his knee and his hitch, you know,

0:02:17.520 --> 0:02:20.000
<v Speaker 1>being able to to sink into it better. And and

0:02:20.120 --> 0:02:23.320
<v Speaker 1>as he mentioned, because you think about the game of

0:02:23.320 --> 0:02:25.080
<v Speaker 1>football and it's just, oh, just go back and throw

0:02:25.160 --> 0:02:29.200
<v Speaker 1>the ball. But every single movement that's part of his dropback,

0:02:29.760 --> 0:02:33.120
<v Speaker 1>it all lines up with where the receivers are in

0:02:33.160 --> 0:02:35.639
<v Speaker 1>their routs, the timing of the play, and that's why

0:02:35.639 --> 0:02:37.359
<v Speaker 1>he felt like the timing was better, and that's why

0:02:37.360 --> 0:02:40.239
<v Speaker 1>he felt the accuracy was better. For Aaron Rodgers to

0:02:40.280 --> 0:02:43.120
<v Speaker 1>go seventy points seven completion percentage when you asked me

0:02:43.120 --> 0:02:44.919
<v Speaker 1>about two thousand and twenty, that will be the first

0:02:44.919 --> 0:02:47.480
<v Speaker 1>thing that always comes to mind. Yeah, it's pretty remarkable

0:02:47.560 --> 0:02:50.520
<v Speaker 1>that a quarterback in his thirteenth year as a starter

0:02:50.720 --> 0:02:54.720
<v Speaker 1>would set both personal bests and franchise records in the

0:02:54.800 --> 0:02:59.160
<v Speaker 1>categories of touchdown passes and completion percentage t s. And

0:02:59.280 --> 0:03:01.760
<v Speaker 1>the seventy point at seven. As you mentioned, I think

0:03:01.800 --> 0:03:03.840
<v Speaker 1>what stands out to me the most. It goes along

0:03:03.880 --> 0:03:05.840
<v Speaker 1>with what you said about playing on time. But the

0:03:05.840 --> 0:03:08.160
<v Speaker 1>way I would phrase it, or the way I'll remember

0:03:08.200 --> 0:03:12.799
<v Speaker 1>it is his command of the game. And I say

0:03:12.880 --> 0:03:16.120
<v Speaker 1>that not because Aaron Rodgers hasn't played like this before.

0:03:16.280 --> 0:03:18.400
<v Speaker 1>And you know, the command that he showed at the

0:03:18.440 --> 0:03:21.880
<v Speaker 1>line of scrimmage with making the checks and just looking

0:03:21.919 --> 0:03:24.079
<v Speaker 1>like he was always in control of what was going

0:03:24.120 --> 0:03:26.440
<v Speaker 1>on out there. We've seen that before. He's one m

0:03:26.520 --> 0:03:29.600
<v Speaker 1>v p S before the run the table in we

0:03:29.639 --> 0:03:32.440
<v Speaker 1>saw Aaron Rodgers playing like that with that sort of

0:03:32.480 --> 0:03:34.920
<v Speaker 1>command at the line of scrimmage. But what stood out

0:03:34.920 --> 0:03:37.800
<v Speaker 1>to me about it this year is that he achieved

0:03:37.840 --> 0:03:40.920
<v Speaker 1>that level of command in just his second year in

0:03:41.000 --> 0:03:44.080
<v Speaker 1>a brand new offense. We didn't see it in nine

0:03:44.680 --> 0:03:47.640
<v Speaker 1>when he and all the other players on offense we're

0:03:47.720 --> 0:03:50.400
<v Speaker 1>learning Matt Lafleur system and we're trying to get accustomed

0:03:50.400 --> 0:03:53.800
<v Speaker 1>to it, and Rogers command of the offense and of

0:03:53.840 --> 0:03:56.280
<v Speaker 1>everything that was going on in the field went to

0:03:56.320 --> 0:04:00.520
<v Speaker 1>another level in just his second year in the offense,

0:04:00.560 --> 0:04:04.880
<v Speaker 1>and and the um the progress, the maturation of everything.

0:04:05.600 --> 0:04:09.640
<v Speaker 1>His mastery of this offense just in a second season,

0:04:09.920 --> 0:04:12.360
<v Speaker 1>I think speaks volumes of the kind of player he is,

0:04:12.440 --> 0:04:15.880
<v Speaker 1>both both mentally and then obviously physically. With the things

0:04:15.920 --> 0:04:18.800
<v Speaker 1>that that you talked about, the way he the way

0:04:18.839 --> 0:04:22.160
<v Speaker 1>he got his game physically back to where we had

0:04:22.160 --> 0:04:24.480
<v Speaker 1>seen it in the past. He reminds me almost like

0:04:24.520 --> 0:04:27.359
<v Speaker 1>of a professor right where you know, there's certain you know,

0:04:27.440 --> 0:04:29.719
<v Speaker 1>men and women out there, they're gonna be incredibly intelligent,

0:04:29.760 --> 0:04:31.520
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna have high i q s. They're gonna be

0:04:31.520 --> 0:04:33.880
<v Speaker 1>able to research and see things and you know, go

0:04:34.000 --> 0:04:37.279
<v Speaker 1>through their doctor program. But the more knowledge that you

0:04:37.400 --> 0:04:40.440
<v Speaker 1>gain over the years, the stronger that makes you. From

0:04:40.520 --> 0:04:43.640
<v Speaker 1>whether it's a critical thinking aspect or an argumentation or

0:04:43.680 --> 0:04:46.360
<v Speaker 1>just being able to present facts to a classroom. That's

0:04:46.360 --> 0:04:49.799
<v Speaker 1>where I saw Rogers this year. He's seen it all,

0:04:49.960 --> 0:04:52.479
<v Speaker 1>he's done it all. And because of that knowledge base

0:04:52.600 --> 0:04:55.640
<v Speaker 1>that he has, everything that he's looked at on the field,

0:04:56.080 --> 0:04:58.279
<v Speaker 1>he's seen it for the most part in some shape

0:04:58.360 --> 0:05:01.440
<v Speaker 1>or form before and being able to get his physical

0:05:01.960 --> 0:05:04.400
<v Speaker 1>aspect of that back, you know, being able to be confident,

0:05:04.440 --> 0:05:07.279
<v Speaker 1>to stand tall in the pocket. And and also Mike

0:05:07.440 --> 0:05:09.719
<v Speaker 1>give credit to this, to the scheme. How many times

0:05:09.720 --> 0:05:11.680
<v Speaker 1>this year did he go out of his way to

0:05:11.720 --> 0:05:14.720
<v Speaker 1>mention you know what Nathaniel Hackett, Matt Lafleur and Luke

0:05:14.760 --> 0:05:17.839
<v Speaker 1>Getsie what these coaches had come up with. Uh, it

0:05:17.960 --> 0:05:20.520
<v Speaker 1>was innovative, it was creative, and he wasn't you know,

0:05:20.640 --> 0:05:23.720
<v Speaker 1>he was obviously embracing what what that change was the

0:05:23.800 --> 0:05:26.680
<v Speaker 1>last two seasons. And when somebody asked me this, you know,

0:05:26.680 --> 0:05:28.400
<v Speaker 1>in year three, now, what do you expect in Matt

0:05:28.480 --> 0:05:30.719
<v Speaker 1>lafleur scheme? You know, I expect him to take it

0:05:30.760 --> 0:05:34.159
<v Speaker 1>to another level because there's still things they can work on. Certainly,

0:05:34.160 --> 0:05:35.960
<v Speaker 1>we've got to figure out what this backfield looks like.

0:05:35.960 --> 0:05:37.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure there's gonna be a couple of new offensive

0:05:37.800 --> 0:05:39.880
<v Speaker 1>weapons that will be added this offseason three that the

0:05:39.920 --> 0:05:42.719
<v Speaker 1>draft of free agency, but seeing where they take this

0:05:42.800 --> 0:05:45.800
<v Speaker 1>now when okay, now you've established Robert Tonyan, you have

0:05:45.920 --> 0:05:48.000
<v Speaker 1>Davante Adams, considered one of the best in the game,

0:05:48.480 --> 0:05:51.839
<v Speaker 1>and this multitude of you know that the illusion of

0:05:51.880 --> 0:05:55.159
<v Speaker 1>complexity that we always talk about. I think you're gonna

0:05:55.200 --> 0:05:57.159
<v Speaker 1>see la fleur and hack it go back into the

0:05:57.640 --> 0:05:59.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, the lab this offseason and find some more

0:05:59.600 --> 0:06:01.840
<v Speaker 1>stuff to to bring this offense back and and and

0:06:01.880 --> 0:06:04.039
<v Speaker 1>make them even more potent. And and obviously, as we

0:06:04.120 --> 0:06:07.240
<v Speaker 1>heard earlier this week, Aaron Rodgers is a massive part

0:06:07.560 --> 0:06:10.520
<v Speaker 1>of that plan. Yeah, no question about it. And the

0:06:10.600 --> 0:06:13.719
<v Speaker 1>historical significance of this being a third m v P

0:06:13.880 --> 0:06:16.360
<v Speaker 1>for Rogers again assuming that he is named that m

0:06:16.400 --> 0:06:18.680
<v Speaker 1>v P on Saturday Night, which is what we all expect.

0:06:19.520 --> 0:06:22.679
<v Speaker 1>The significance of this is is pretty astounding because only

0:06:22.920 --> 0:06:26.799
<v Speaker 1>five other players in the history of the Associated Press

0:06:26.920 --> 0:06:30.520
<v Speaker 1>NFL Most Valuable Player Award, which dates back to seven,

0:06:30.920 --> 0:06:33.760
<v Speaker 1>only five other players have ever won it three times,

0:06:33.800 --> 0:06:36.479
<v Speaker 1>and that list is Peyton Manning, who tops the list

0:06:36.520 --> 0:06:39.719
<v Speaker 1>with five m vps. But then the other three time

0:06:39.720 --> 0:06:43.800
<v Speaker 1>winners are Tom Brady, Brett Farve, Johnny Unitis and Jim

0:06:43.839 --> 0:06:46.440
<v Speaker 1>Brown and Aaron Rodgers adding his name to that list.

0:06:46.480 --> 0:06:49.599
<v Speaker 1>He mentioned it um during the season when the question

0:06:49.680 --> 0:06:51.120
<v Speaker 1>was posed to him, what would it mean to you

0:06:51.240 --> 0:06:53.240
<v Speaker 1>to to join a list of players like that? And

0:06:53.279 --> 0:06:57.040
<v Speaker 1>of course he said it would be incredibly special. Um.

0:06:57.200 --> 0:06:59.440
<v Speaker 1>He would always trade the m v p s for

0:06:59.560 --> 0:07:02.520
<v Speaker 1>another Super Bowl, of course, but um, but he's well

0:07:02.560 --> 0:07:06.000
<v Speaker 1>aware of the of the legacy that that he's establishing.

0:07:06.000 --> 0:07:09.039
<v Speaker 1>And when you think about, as we've been talking about

0:07:09.040 --> 0:07:11.600
<v Speaker 1>what he did in his second year in the Flour's

0:07:11.680 --> 0:07:14.560
<v Speaker 1>offense and maybe where this is headed in year three,

0:07:14.680 --> 0:07:18.080
<v Speaker 1>year four for him in La Fleur's offense, three m vps,

0:07:18.120 --> 0:07:21.160
<v Speaker 1>he he might not be done now. Patrick Mahomes, Josh Allen,

0:07:21.240 --> 0:07:24.240
<v Speaker 1>lots of other really good quarterbacks. Tom Brady's not done

0:07:24.240 --> 0:07:27.960
<v Speaker 1>playing yet either. But um, but to say, you know, you,

0:07:27.960 --> 0:07:30.440
<v Speaker 1>you can't even say that this is by any means

0:07:30.520 --> 0:07:32.880
<v Speaker 1>the last hurrah for Aaron Rodgers being in an m

0:07:32.960 --> 0:07:36.440
<v Speaker 1>v P race based on how he played in Yeah,

0:07:36.440 --> 0:07:38.680
<v Speaker 1>and when you look at Brady now to Mike, I mean,

0:07:38.920 --> 0:07:41.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, certainly he has to stay healthy. You gotta

0:07:41.000 --> 0:07:43.400
<v Speaker 1>avoid disaster in the pocket and and those things that

0:07:43.440 --> 0:07:45.720
<v Speaker 1>can change, you know, in an instant. But for him

0:07:45.760 --> 0:07:47.720
<v Speaker 1>to be able to play at this level at forty three,

0:07:47.760 --> 0:07:50.000
<v Speaker 1>I have to imagine Aaron Rodgers looks at that and

0:07:50.080 --> 0:07:53.120
<v Speaker 1>is inspired to to what he could potentially do. Was talking.

0:07:53.560 --> 0:07:55.280
<v Speaker 1>I was talking with James Jones a couple of weeks

0:07:55.320 --> 0:07:57.120
<v Speaker 1>ago for a story I was trying to write on

0:07:57.160 --> 0:07:59.800
<v Speaker 1>Davante Adams that we will right at some point. Uh.

0:08:00.040 --> 0:08:02.320
<v Speaker 1>Also is asking him about Aaron Rodgers and his candidacy

0:08:02.360 --> 0:08:04.000
<v Speaker 1>for this, and he said there's two things that really

0:08:04.000 --> 0:08:06.120
<v Speaker 1>stood out to him and why he thinks he can

0:08:06.160 --> 0:08:09.120
<v Speaker 1>play into his forties. And it's one he has natural

0:08:09.320 --> 0:08:11.560
<v Speaker 1>arm talent. Uh, not the kind of stuff that you're

0:08:11.600 --> 0:08:13.240
<v Speaker 1>just gonna go walk into a weight room and just

0:08:13.320 --> 0:08:15.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, build up your arm strength or just make

0:08:15.440 --> 0:08:19.040
<v Speaker 1>yourself into something that you maybe naturally aren't. Uh. He

0:08:19.080 --> 0:08:22.680
<v Speaker 1>throws the ball hard and far, and he doesn't have

0:08:22.720 --> 0:08:24.440
<v Speaker 1>to do like put a lot into it to be

0:08:24.440 --> 0:08:27.240
<v Speaker 1>able to accomplish that. It's just god given ability that

0:08:27.360 --> 0:08:30.240
<v Speaker 1>he's been able to cultivate over the years with his mechanics.

0:08:30.680 --> 0:08:33.080
<v Speaker 1>And for that reason, James thinks he's gonna be able

0:08:33.080 --> 0:08:34.960
<v Speaker 1>to play well into his forties. And then when you

0:08:35.040 --> 0:08:37.280
<v Speaker 1>look at the fact that he has taken care of

0:08:37.360 --> 0:08:39.640
<v Speaker 1>himself the way that he has, I don't know if

0:08:39.679 --> 0:08:43.320
<v Speaker 1>he's on the TV twelve type diet that that Tom

0:08:43.360 --> 0:08:46.040
<v Speaker 1>Brady's on that I don't think I could survive more

0:08:46.080 --> 0:08:48.280
<v Speaker 1>than six hours if it was up to me. But

0:08:49.000 --> 0:08:51.680
<v Speaker 1>he obviously years ago whether it was his, you know,

0:08:51.880 --> 0:08:54.600
<v Speaker 1>looking into the gluten and lactose in those type of things.

0:08:55.040 --> 0:08:58.920
<v Speaker 1>Rogers made a commitment in his early thirties. Now he's

0:08:58.920 --> 0:09:02.120
<v Speaker 1>sitting at thirty seven these early thirties, that he wanted

0:09:02.160 --> 0:09:04.480
<v Speaker 1>to play into his forties. He wanted to be able

0:09:04.520 --> 0:09:06.320
<v Speaker 1>to How many times we heard about the back nine

0:09:06.360 --> 0:09:09.520
<v Speaker 1>analogy that he used, and it wasn't just the weight room,

0:09:09.520 --> 0:09:12.360
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't just squatting. It was his diet, and Rogers

0:09:12.400 --> 0:09:16.199
<v Speaker 1>is an incredibly disciplined human being and for that reason, Yeah,

0:09:16.400 --> 0:09:19.400
<v Speaker 1>he's at thirty seven. We're gonna see what the future holds.

0:09:19.840 --> 0:09:23.080
<v Speaker 1>I personally am really embracing this whole beautiful mystery thing

0:09:23.120 --> 0:09:24.960
<v Speaker 1>that he brought up a couple of weeks ago. We

0:09:25.160 --> 0:09:27.520
<v Speaker 1>can't predict what is going to happen. You don't know

0:09:27.880 --> 0:09:30.319
<v Speaker 1>when the last time is ultimately that you're gonna step

0:09:30.320 --> 0:09:33.079
<v Speaker 1>on a field. So yeah, just let it play out

0:09:33.120 --> 0:09:36.280
<v Speaker 1>and see where it takes us. But certainly at thirty seven,

0:09:36.360 --> 0:09:39.840
<v Speaker 1>Brady at forty three really showing no signs of slowing down.

0:09:39.840 --> 0:09:41.240
<v Speaker 1>It looks like he wants to even maybe take it

0:09:41.320 --> 0:09:43.360
<v Speaker 1>past forty five now or whatever he was saying in

0:09:43.400 --> 0:09:45.760
<v Speaker 1>the media this past week. Yeah, I think we gotta

0:09:45.760 --> 0:09:48.840
<v Speaker 1>stop trying to put timelines on everybody. Yeah. Absolutely. Well.

0:09:49.120 --> 0:09:50.920
<v Speaker 1>One other m v P note to put this in

0:09:51.000 --> 0:09:54.040
<v Speaker 1>perspective for Packers fans. With Rogers winning his third m

0:09:54.120 --> 0:09:58.200
<v Speaker 1>v P since the advent of the Associated Press Award

0:09:58.240 --> 0:10:02.199
<v Speaker 1>in nine seven, this will now be the ninth m

0:10:02.280 --> 0:10:05.680
<v Speaker 1>v P that the Green Bay Packers of one Paul Hornick,

0:10:05.760 --> 0:10:08.160
<v Speaker 1>Jim Taylor, bart Starr each one one m v P

0:10:08.360 --> 0:10:11.160
<v Speaker 1>in the Lombardi era in the sixties five one three

0:10:11.320 --> 0:10:15.000
<v Speaker 1>Rogers won three. That is nine. And if you look

0:10:15.040 --> 0:10:18.760
<v Speaker 1>at West, you look at the Packers current NFC North

0:10:18.920 --> 0:10:24.040
<v Speaker 1>rivals Minnesota, Chicago, and Detroit, those three franchises have won

0:10:24.080 --> 0:10:26.760
<v Speaker 1>a combined five m v p s in the time

0:10:26.800 --> 0:10:29.560
<v Speaker 1>that the Packers have won nine. So Green Bay has

0:10:29.600 --> 0:10:32.080
<v Speaker 1>almost doubled up on its competitors. For those who are

0:10:32.120 --> 0:10:36.760
<v Speaker 1>wondering the five m vps, Adrian Peterson, fran Tarkenton, Alan

0:10:36.800 --> 0:10:41.880
<v Speaker 1>Page for the Minnesota Vikings, Bear, Barry Sanders, who taught

0:10:41.920 --> 0:10:44.520
<v Speaker 1>who out, shared one with Brett far Brett Farst. Third

0:10:44.520 --> 0:10:46.920
<v Speaker 1>one was shared with Sanders and then Walter Payton of

0:10:46.960 --> 0:10:50.400
<v Speaker 1>the Chicago Bears in nineteen seventy seven. Yeah, Alan Page

0:10:51.440 --> 0:10:54.160
<v Speaker 1>on me, I would have gotten seventy one. As you

0:10:54.200 --> 0:10:56.199
<v Speaker 1>can tell, I was doing some research for what we're

0:10:56.200 --> 0:10:58.559
<v Speaker 1>going to be posting over the over the weekend here

0:10:58.559 --> 0:11:01.040
<v Speaker 1>on the website. But Alan Page one of the few

0:11:01.080 --> 0:11:05.200
<v Speaker 1>defensive players to win the NFL's Most Valuable Player award

0:11:05.280 --> 0:11:07.920
<v Speaker 1>in nineteen seventy one. The last defensive player to win

0:11:07.920 --> 0:11:12.479
<v Speaker 1>it actually Nighties six Lawrence Taylor. It's been all quarterbacks

0:11:12.480 --> 0:11:15.360
<v Speaker 1>and running backs since nine eight six to U to

0:11:15.440 --> 0:11:17.880
<v Speaker 1>win the award. Wide receivers never won it. I thought

0:11:17.960 --> 0:11:20.680
<v Speaker 1>that was interesting, Yeah, that never that is true. Um

0:11:20.760 --> 0:11:24.439
<v Speaker 1>Don Hucker having back before the Associated Press, as I say,

0:11:24.480 --> 0:11:26.600
<v Speaker 1>I referenced the nineteen fifty seven the birth of the

0:11:26.600 --> 0:11:31.040
<v Speaker 1>Associated Press Award. There was a league MVP back in

0:11:31.120 --> 0:11:33.720
<v Speaker 1>the forties and Don Hudson for the Packers won that

0:11:34.040 --> 0:11:36.760
<v Speaker 1>a couple of times, but it's not recognized in the

0:11:36.800 --> 0:11:39.559
<v Speaker 1>same way that the Associated Press won as far as

0:11:39.600 --> 0:11:42.120
<v Speaker 1>the the history books dating back to fifty seven when

0:11:42.160 --> 0:11:45.280
<v Speaker 1>Jim Brown won the first two in in fifty seven

0:11:45.520 --> 0:11:48.760
<v Speaker 1>and fifty eight. So sirius x M NFL radio Channel

0:11:48.760 --> 0:11:51.840
<v Speaker 1>eighty eight West is the only radio outlet dedicated to

0:11:51.840 --> 0:11:54.800
<v Speaker 1>the National Football League seven days a week, three hundred

0:11:54.880 --> 0:11:58.679
<v Speaker 1>sixty five days a year. The other news that will

0:11:58.720 --> 0:12:01.800
<v Speaker 1>be coming out this weekend prior to the Super Bowl

0:12:01.800 --> 0:12:04.599
<v Speaker 1>will be the Pro Football Hall of Fame Class of

0:12:05.600 --> 0:12:09.920
<v Speaker 1>one and again another assumption. Another expectation that we have

0:12:10.480 --> 0:12:13.360
<v Speaker 1>for this weekend is that former Packers defensive back Charles

0:12:13.360 --> 0:12:16.560
<v Speaker 1>Woodson will become a first ballot Hall of Famer. This

0:12:16.640 --> 0:12:20.079
<v Speaker 1>is his first year of eligibility. I can't imagine that

0:12:20.120 --> 0:12:24.040
<v Speaker 1>he's not going to get in um and uh, here's

0:12:24.160 --> 0:12:26.400
<v Speaker 1>here's a couple of things, a couple of statistics to

0:12:26.440 --> 0:12:29.760
<v Speaker 1>throw your way with regard to this West. Charles Woodson

0:12:29.760 --> 0:12:32.320
<v Speaker 1>played eighteen seasons in the National Football League as a

0:12:32.360 --> 0:12:36.360
<v Speaker 1>defensive back, which is remarkable. He played only seven of

0:12:36.360 --> 0:12:39.800
<v Speaker 1>those eighteen in green Bay. He played the other eleven

0:12:39.840 --> 0:12:42.079
<v Speaker 1>in Oakland. On both the front and the back end

0:12:42.120 --> 0:12:46.439
<v Speaker 1>of his stint in green Bay. But you could really

0:12:46.480 --> 0:12:49.600
<v Speaker 1>make the argument that the seven years in Green Bay

0:12:49.880 --> 0:12:53.160
<v Speaker 1>is what took Charles Woodson from you know, the Pro

0:12:53.280 --> 0:12:57.040
<v Speaker 1>Bowl caliber player to a Hall of Famer. When you

0:12:57.080 --> 0:12:58.840
<v Speaker 1>look at what he did, and I'll throw a couple

0:12:58.840 --> 0:13:00.920
<v Speaker 1>of numbers your way. Woods And finished his career with

0:13:00.960 --> 0:13:05.520
<v Speaker 1>sixty five interceptions. Thirty eight of those sixty five came

0:13:05.520 --> 0:13:09.319
<v Speaker 1>in seven years in Green Bay. And he scored fourteen

0:13:09.400 --> 0:13:14.240
<v Speaker 1>defensive touchdowns in his career, ten of those fourteen as

0:13:14.280 --> 0:13:17.960
<v Speaker 1>a member of the Packers. Those ten defensive touchdowns nine

0:13:18.000 --> 0:13:22.559
<v Speaker 1>interception returns. Both of those are green Bay Packers defensive

0:13:23.000 --> 0:13:27.360
<v Speaker 1>franchise records. So what he did, what he did in

0:13:27.440 --> 0:13:30.280
<v Speaker 1>seven years in Green Bay, it it's it's in the

0:13:30.360 --> 0:13:33.440
<v Speaker 1>history books. It's not going anywhere west and uh this

0:13:33.520 --> 0:13:35.760
<v Speaker 1>will be uh yet. I mean, the Packers have had

0:13:35.960 --> 0:13:38.160
<v Speaker 1>a pretty good run. I believe he'll be the sixth

0:13:38.760 --> 0:13:41.839
<v Speaker 1>Hall of Famer that the Packers lay claimed to over

0:13:41.880 --> 0:13:44.920
<v Speaker 1>the last you know, about eight years, at eight or

0:13:44.960 --> 0:13:48.800
<v Speaker 1>nine years um and uh um, Yeah, Charles Woodson certainly

0:13:48.840 --> 0:13:51.880
<v Speaker 1>deserving of that gold jacket. It's funny because everybody always

0:13:52.040 --> 0:13:55.360
<v Speaker 1>people like to put the MLB like metric on all

0:13:55.400 --> 0:13:57.640
<v Speaker 1>this stuff. Like and even my father, God bless him,

0:13:58.040 --> 0:13:59.960
<v Speaker 1>said to me when I when I stopped over at

0:14:00.040 --> 0:14:03.520
<v Speaker 1>their house a couple of nights ago, mentioned, uh, you know, hey,

0:14:03.600 --> 0:14:05.080
<v Speaker 1>is he gonna go in as a as a packer

0:14:05.160 --> 0:14:07.680
<v Speaker 1>or a raider? This is how you know how great

0:14:08.120 --> 0:14:11.880
<v Speaker 1>Charles Woodson is. It isn't about claiming Charles Woodson. It's

0:14:11.880 --> 0:14:15.320
<v Speaker 1>the fact that he had incredible careers in both places.

0:14:16.200 --> 0:14:22.000
<v Speaker 1>As you says, I think you could actually you could

0:14:22.000 --> 0:14:24.200
<v Speaker 1>take his seven years in Green Bay, maybe tack on

0:14:24.240 --> 0:14:26.280
<v Speaker 1>an extra two or something on either side of that

0:14:26.320 --> 0:14:28.240
<v Speaker 1>was a Hall of Fame career in itself, what he

0:14:28.280 --> 0:14:31.800
<v Speaker 1>did in Green Bay and for him to then make

0:14:31.840 --> 0:14:35.400
<v Speaker 1>the transition to safety his last season the National Football League,

0:14:35.400 --> 0:14:37.480
<v Speaker 1>I think he was second team All Pro at safety.

0:14:37.920 --> 0:14:40.920
<v Speaker 1>Um he went in uh, you know when you go

0:14:41.040 --> 0:14:43.360
<v Speaker 1>him back to think about the all the juice behind

0:14:43.440 --> 0:14:46.119
<v Speaker 1>him when he came into the league, the Heisman everything.

0:14:46.160 --> 0:14:49.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he had these incredible expectations and that's not

0:14:50.000 --> 0:14:52.360
<v Speaker 1>always easy to live up to for any player, let

0:14:52.400 --> 0:14:55.840
<v Speaker 1>alone a defensive back, because there are certain things that

0:14:55.920 --> 0:14:58.600
<v Speaker 1>have to happen in order for you to make plays.

0:14:58.680 --> 0:15:01.400
<v Speaker 1>And and what I loved about Charles woodson story is

0:15:02.320 --> 0:15:05.600
<v Speaker 1>you talk about Ted Thompson and in the building of

0:15:05.680 --> 0:15:09.120
<v Speaker 1>a football team and a championship Super Bowl forty five

0:15:09.240 --> 0:15:12.600
<v Speaker 1>team in in two thousand, you know, six to two

0:15:12.680 --> 0:15:16.280
<v Speaker 1>thousand and ten. In that window, Woodson was the reluctant

0:15:16.360 --> 0:15:19.400
<v Speaker 1>hero in that he was the guy that necessarily didn't

0:15:19.480 --> 0:15:21.560
<v Speaker 1>want to come to Green Bay at first, maybe even

0:15:21.640 --> 0:15:23.960
<v Speaker 1>waited a little extra longer on the free agent market

0:15:24.000 --> 0:15:26.360
<v Speaker 1>to see if something else would come along. It didn't,

0:15:26.680 --> 0:15:29.480
<v Speaker 1>and he had to work through some rough spots early

0:15:29.560 --> 0:15:32.320
<v Speaker 1>in his career. You've heard some of the stories about

0:15:32.360 --> 0:15:36.640
<v Speaker 1>practices and things like that, but man, when he it's

0:15:36.680 --> 0:15:40.000
<v Speaker 1>like it's almost like the like the the teenager analogy, right,

0:15:40.080 --> 0:15:42.920
<v Speaker 1>Like they get kind of rambunctious, and then they settle in,

0:15:43.000 --> 0:15:47.120
<v Speaker 1>they learned from their mistakes, and they become a galvanizing force. Uh.

0:15:47.320 --> 0:15:49.760
<v Speaker 1>He became that on this football team. And when you

0:15:49.920 --> 0:15:54.000
<v Speaker 1>think back to that Super Bowl championship, him being able

0:15:54.040 --> 0:15:56.320
<v Speaker 1>to win Defensive Player of the Year in two thousand nine,

0:15:57.080 --> 0:16:00.320
<v Speaker 1>what a remarkable run he was on in p Bowl.

0:16:00.720 --> 0:16:04.680
<v Speaker 1>Just were magnetized to him, to his energy, to his leadership.

0:16:05.160 --> 0:16:07.280
<v Speaker 1>I will never forget I was not on the I

0:16:07.360 --> 0:16:09.520
<v Speaker 1>was all I only covered him seven games, really when

0:16:09.720 --> 0:16:12.040
<v Speaker 1>the seven games before he got injured in two thousand twelve.

0:16:12.800 --> 0:16:14.440
<v Speaker 1>But the thing that always will stand out to me

0:16:14.640 --> 0:16:20.320
<v Speaker 1>is that Charles Woodson being able to go into a

0:16:20.400 --> 0:16:23.560
<v Speaker 1>locker room after those games. He only talked usually once

0:16:23.600 --> 0:16:26.280
<v Speaker 1>a week, and he'd always have a custom made suit

0:16:26.400 --> 0:16:28.760
<v Speaker 1>for every single home game, probably road game too. I

0:16:28.800 --> 0:16:33.000
<v Speaker 1>didn't cover those. He would be at his locker, everything

0:16:33.040 --> 0:16:35.120
<v Speaker 1>would be cleared out basically a lot of times by

0:16:35.160 --> 0:16:37.200
<v Speaker 1>the time he finally turned around to address the media,

0:16:37.640 --> 0:16:39.680
<v Speaker 1>and he just sit there and he would talk, and

0:16:39.760 --> 0:16:42.560
<v Speaker 1>he would talk whatever the topic of discussion was. He'd

0:16:42.560 --> 0:16:44.960
<v Speaker 1>be there until basically media was done with him, and

0:16:45.000 --> 0:16:49.200
<v Speaker 1>then he'd go about his way and in all these

0:16:49.280 --> 0:16:51.680
<v Speaker 1>years I've covered the National Football League, doesn't matter if

0:16:51.720 --> 0:16:53.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm in the Packers locker room an opposing team locker room.

0:16:54.720 --> 0:16:58.360
<v Speaker 1>I to this day, I've never seen anyone like Charles Woodson.

0:16:58.600 --> 0:17:01.880
<v Speaker 1>He just he was a brand into himself. He was

0:17:02.160 --> 0:17:06.480
<v Speaker 1>there was just a weird type of kinetic energy that

0:17:06.640 --> 0:17:09.000
<v Speaker 1>you just just felt every time you were in his

0:17:09.400 --> 0:17:12.600
<v Speaker 1>his presence and and now obviously getting the highest honorable Yeah,

0:17:12.680 --> 0:17:15.119
<v Speaker 1>that's that's what it was for me. And I covered

0:17:15.160 --> 0:17:17.520
<v Speaker 1>his entire career in Green Bay. His arrival in Green

0:17:17.600 --> 0:17:20.320
<v Speaker 1>Bay was actually the same year, two thousand six that

0:17:20.400 --> 0:17:23.080
<v Speaker 1>I got hired for this job at Packers dot Com.

0:17:23.160 --> 0:17:26.200
<v Speaker 1>So I covered his entire time in Green Bay, and uh,

0:17:26.320 --> 0:17:29.080
<v Speaker 1>and he just, Yeah, the best way I can put

0:17:29.160 --> 0:17:31.520
<v Speaker 1>it is he he had a presence about him that

0:17:31.840 --> 0:17:35.680
<v Speaker 1>was just that was just different. That was, as you say, magnetizing.

0:17:36.160 --> 0:17:38.120
<v Speaker 1>And we hear that with a lot of players around

0:17:38.119 --> 0:17:40.040
<v Speaker 1>the league, not just a guy like Aaron Rodgers, who

0:17:40.080 --> 0:17:42.440
<v Speaker 1>certainly has a presence too. We heard about that and

0:17:42.600 --> 0:17:45.359
<v Speaker 1>felt it with Julius Peppers and Marcedes Lewis, who's been

0:17:45.359 --> 0:17:47.200
<v Speaker 1>in the locker room now for the last couple of years,

0:17:47.680 --> 0:17:49.960
<v Speaker 1>but even Charles Woodson. There there was there was a

0:17:50.040 --> 0:17:53.119
<v Speaker 1>presence of a presence about him that was just different

0:17:53.200 --> 0:17:57.240
<v Speaker 1>from anybody any other NFL player that that I've been around.

0:17:57.440 --> 0:18:01.120
<v Speaker 1>And here's here's another thing again, statistic to put things

0:18:01.200 --> 0:18:05.800
<v Speaker 1>in perspective. Your good friend west Leroy Butler, who let

0:18:05.840 --> 0:18:07.720
<v Speaker 1>the cat out of the bag apparently a week or

0:18:07.720 --> 0:18:10.720
<v Speaker 1>two ago on Twitter that as a as a finalist

0:18:10.800 --> 0:18:12.840
<v Speaker 1>for the Hall of Fame, he did not get selected

0:18:12.920 --> 0:18:17.480
<v Speaker 1>this year, um and will certainly be UM rooting for

0:18:17.600 --> 0:18:20.280
<v Speaker 1>him in the coming years to to finally get over

0:18:20.359 --> 0:18:22.480
<v Speaker 1>this hump, so to speak, because you and I both

0:18:22.520 --> 0:18:24.800
<v Speaker 1>believe Lroy Butler deserves to be in Cannon as a

0:18:24.840 --> 0:18:27.159
<v Speaker 1>Hall of Famer. Leroy Butler played twelve years with the

0:18:27.200 --> 0:18:31.760
<v Speaker 1>Green Bay Packers and intercepted thirty eight passes. Charles Woodson

0:18:31.840 --> 0:18:34.760
<v Speaker 1>played seven years with the Green Bay Packers and intercepted

0:18:34.840 --> 0:18:37.720
<v Speaker 1>thirty eight passes. They are tied for fourth. These are

0:18:37.760 --> 0:18:41.200
<v Speaker 1>regular season statistics. They are tied for fourth on the

0:18:41.320 --> 0:18:45.280
<v Speaker 1>Packers all time list for interceptions and uh and Woodson

0:18:45.320 --> 0:18:48.520
<v Speaker 1>played five fewer seasons in Green Bay than Butler did.

0:18:48.600 --> 0:18:52.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean what what Charles Woodson did, It wasn't you

0:18:52.280 --> 0:18:54.639
<v Speaker 1>can't even say it was just like a rebirth of

0:18:54.720 --> 0:18:56.679
<v Speaker 1>his career. It's like what you said, it was almost

0:18:57.040 --> 0:18:58.760
<v Speaker 1>his time in green Bay was almost a Hall of

0:18:58.840 --> 0:19:02.560
<v Speaker 1>Fame career in and of itself. And um, I I

0:19:02.680 --> 0:19:06.840
<v Speaker 1>don't know what the summer holds as far as how

0:19:06.960 --> 0:19:09.480
<v Speaker 1>the induction is going to take place. I've been to

0:19:09.640 --> 0:19:12.359
<v Speaker 1>Canton for the inductions of Brett Farven Jerry Kramer. I

0:19:12.440 --> 0:19:15.840
<v Speaker 1>would love to go there for Charles Woodson Woodson's as

0:19:15.880 --> 0:19:17.680
<v Speaker 1>well and reconnect with him and get to talk with

0:19:17.760 --> 0:19:20.240
<v Speaker 1>him and provide some stuff on packers dot Com. I

0:19:20.359 --> 0:19:23.359
<v Speaker 1>don't know what next summer holds. We'll just have to

0:19:23.520 --> 0:19:25.760
<v Speaker 1>We'll just have to wait and see. But uh um,

0:19:25.920 --> 0:19:28.320
<v Speaker 1>but whenever that time comes to get to chat with him,

0:19:28.359 --> 0:19:30.399
<v Speaker 1>I will definitely look forward to it. One other thing,

0:19:30.480 --> 0:19:32.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm glad you brought that up about. You know how

0:19:32.600 --> 0:19:35.240
<v Speaker 1>he sort of reinvented himself in Green Bay. It's something

0:19:35.320 --> 0:19:37.600
<v Speaker 1>that has become more prevalent now in the NFL. You

0:19:37.680 --> 0:19:40.760
<v Speaker 1>see these defensive backs, these boundary cornerbacks, making switches the

0:19:40.840 --> 0:19:43.920
<v Speaker 1>safety or the nickel. That's what was beautiful about Charles

0:19:44.000 --> 0:19:46.760
<v Speaker 1>Woodson is that he was an exceptional shutdown cornerback for

0:19:46.840 --> 0:19:48.399
<v Speaker 1>so much of his career, but then he ends up

0:19:48.440 --> 0:19:51.040
<v Speaker 1>going into the slot. He ends up making finally the

0:19:51.080 --> 0:19:52.800
<v Speaker 1>transition to the back end. I remember that was a

0:19:52.920 --> 0:19:55.280
<v Speaker 1>huge Remember how big that story was in two thousand twelve,

0:19:55.320 --> 0:19:58.360
<v Speaker 1>and I was like, hey, is Charles Woodson gonna play safety?

0:19:59.040 --> 0:20:01.920
<v Speaker 1>And he just made plays no matter where he was

0:20:02.040 --> 0:20:05.240
<v Speaker 1>and he adapted his style. I still do this day.

0:20:05.280 --> 0:20:09.119
<v Speaker 1>I know Rex Ryan did not like the fact that

0:20:09.400 --> 0:20:11.960
<v Speaker 1>that Woodson got Defensive Player of the Year over Durrell

0:20:12.000 --> 0:20:15.920
<v Speaker 1>Reevas in two thousand nine, But man, that season that

0:20:16.000 --> 0:20:20.119
<v Speaker 1>Woodson had was so special. And when when at the

0:20:20.200 --> 0:20:23.800
<v Speaker 1>time you realize, oh, you guy gets seven eight interceptions,

0:20:23.840 --> 0:20:25.920
<v Speaker 1>that's a big deal. But then when you cover the

0:20:26.040 --> 0:20:28.200
<v Speaker 1>league for as long as I have now almost a

0:20:28.280 --> 0:20:31.200
<v Speaker 1>decade of covering the league, and obviously you you even longer,

0:20:31.640 --> 0:20:33.680
<v Speaker 1>you start to realize when you get moments like that

0:20:33.840 --> 0:20:37.360
<v Speaker 1>on the front end of your journalism career, you realize

0:20:37.359 --> 0:20:40.840
<v Speaker 1>how rare they are. When that stuff doesn't happen anymore afterwards,

0:20:41.400 --> 0:20:43.679
<v Speaker 1>you get I think, what was it. Darnell Savage had

0:20:43.960 --> 0:20:45.560
<v Speaker 1>four picks this year, and I thought that was a

0:20:45.640 --> 0:20:48.720
<v Speaker 1>really good year for him. Some guys just can go

0:20:48.920 --> 0:20:51.040
<v Speaker 1>find the football and make a play on the football.

0:20:51.040 --> 0:20:53.800
<v Speaker 1>And as you said, ten return for a touchdown, he's

0:20:53.920 --> 0:20:55.280
<v Speaker 1>he was a Hall of Famer. He was. And when

0:20:55.280 --> 0:20:56.920
<v Speaker 1>you talk about the aura that he had in locker room,

0:20:56.960 --> 0:20:58.359
<v Speaker 1>that was a part of the aura. When you were

0:20:58.400 --> 0:21:00.480
<v Speaker 1>talking to Charles Woodson, you understood that this guy is

0:21:00.520 --> 0:21:02.959
<v Speaker 1>going to Canton. This guy is going to is one

0:21:03.000 --> 0:21:05.639
<v Speaker 1>of the very best to ever play his position. And

0:21:05.800 --> 0:21:08.040
<v Speaker 1>as I said, from the get go, the expectations he

0:21:08.119 --> 0:21:10.920
<v Speaker 1>had never shied away from him. And those type of

0:21:10.960 --> 0:21:13.600
<v Speaker 1>individuals are just built differently. They just have something in

0:21:13.720 --> 0:21:16.280
<v Speaker 1>them that is different than most human beings. Yeah, no

0:21:16.440 --> 0:21:19.440
<v Speaker 1>question about it. Well, one last thing before we go here, West,

0:21:19.520 --> 0:21:22.680
<v Speaker 1>just get your thoughts quickly on Super Bowl fifty five

0:21:22.800 --> 0:21:27.399
<v Speaker 1>the Kansas City Chiefs against the Tampa Bay Buccaneers. Any

0:21:27.720 --> 0:21:30.320
<v Speaker 1>thoughts on how you see this one shaking out? So

0:21:30.520 --> 0:21:32.720
<v Speaker 1>I like to go all in on these things, right everyone,

0:21:32.800 --> 0:21:35.359
<v Speaker 1>that's a big topic right now and in boxes all in. Um,

0:21:35.680 --> 0:21:39.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't like to parse my words. I think Kansas

0:21:39.880 --> 0:21:43.200
<v Speaker 1>City wins this handily. If they don't. Fortunately, you and

0:21:43.240 --> 0:21:45.280
<v Speaker 1>I aren't shooting any of these for a while. So well,

0:21:45.320 --> 0:21:48.200
<v Speaker 1>I won't even have to answer for it, but I'll

0:21:48.240 --> 0:21:49.800
<v Speaker 1>be honest with you, Mike. I don't want to say

0:21:49.840 --> 0:21:53.879
<v Speaker 1>I'm getting like Denver Seattle vibes from this game, but

0:21:54.600 --> 0:21:59.320
<v Speaker 1>I I'm wondering. I don't know how competitive it's going

0:21:59.359 --> 0:22:02.800
<v Speaker 1>to be. We're gonna see. I just feel like Kansas

0:22:02.840 --> 0:22:07.440
<v Speaker 1>City has found something again, and I think Patrick Mahomes

0:22:07.480 --> 0:22:09.000
<v Speaker 1>has played in that environment. I saw some of these

0:22:09.000 --> 0:22:11.720
<v Speaker 1>sentiments about well, Mahomes has played Brady and he's lost

0:22:11.800 --> 0:22:14.399
<v Speaker 1>to Brady a lot, and I'm like, okay, but I mean,

0:22:14.520 --> 0:22:18.399
<v Speaker 1>like like Holmes is, Mahomes is the one. He's on

0:22:18.520 --> 0:22:20.879
<v Speaker 1>the throne right now, right like Brady is in here

0:22:20.920 --> 0:22:24.679
<v Speaker 1>with a new team. I just feel like the Kansas

0:22:24.680 --> 0:22:26.640
<v Speaker 1>City brought back a lot of guys from that ball

0:22:26.720 --> 0:22:29.960
<v Speaker 1>club last year. They've been there, they know what it's like. Technically,

0:22:30.040 --> 0:22:31.720
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of a road game for them that they'll

0:22:31.760 --> 0:22:35.480
<v Speaker 1>be traveling over the weekend. But all things considered, I

0:22:35.720 --> 0:22:37.520
<v Speaker 1>just I expect Kansas City to win this thing by

0:22:37.520 --> 0:22:40.479
<v Speaker 1>two touchdowns. I'm with you. I think I think Kansas

0:22:40.520 --> 0:22:42.800
<v Speaker 1>City is the better team, and I do think Kansas

0:22:42.800 --> 0:22:44.760
<v Speaker 1>City is going to have an opportunity to win this

0:22:44.880 --> 0:22:48.080
<v Speaker 1>game handily. The one thing. The two things I will say,

0:22:49.400 --> 0:22:52.240
<v Speaker 1>one is that Kansas City is going to be without

0:22:53.520 --> 0:22:56.600
<v Speaker 1>a starting offensive tackle and Eric Fisher, and we saw

0:22:56.720 --> 0:23:00.160
<v Speaker 1>obviously the Packers the the absence of David back Are

0:23:00.320 --> 0:23:02.240
<v Speaker 1>finally did catch up with the Packers there in the

0:23:02.359 --> 0:23:05.200
<v Speaker 1>NFC Championship game. That defensive front of the Tampa Bay

0:23:05.200 --> 0:23:09.359
<v Speaker 1>Buccaneers is no joke, um. But Patrick Mahomes as far

0:23:09.440 --> 0:23:12.800
<v Speaker 1>as the scrambling around, improvising, doing things on the run, whatever,

0:23:12.960 --> 0:23:15.240
<v Speaker 1>he's as good as there is, as good as anybody

0:23:15.320 --> 0:23:17.719
<v Speaker 1>in the game right now. So I don't know if

0:23:17.840 --> 0:23:20.040
<v Speaker 1>that has as big an impact. The other thing I

0:23:20.080 --> 0:23:22.480
<v Speaker 1>will say, not to state the obvious, but it's the

0:23:22.560 --> 0:23:25.600
<v Speaker 1>turnover thing, wes I. As I had said leading up

0:23:25.600 --> 0:23:28.159
<v Speaker 1>to a NFC Championship game, the Buccaneers don't beat the

0:23:28.200 --> 0:23:30.359
<v Speaker 1>Saints if the Saints don't turn the ball over. And

0:23:31.160 --> 0:23:33.359
<v Speaker 1>even in the NFC title game, I know the Packers

0:23:33.480 --> 0:23:36.880
<v Speaker 1>ultimately won the turnover battle three to two, but when

0:23:36.960 --> 0:23:39.879
<v Speaker 1>the turnover started two to zero, and it was fourteen

0:23:39.960 --> 0:23:43.080
<v Speaker 1>to zero in points off turnovers at that stage, that

0:23:43.240 --> 0:23:44.960
<v Speaker 1>was too big of a hole for the Packers to

0:23:45.040 --> 0:23:47.159
<v Speaker 1>climb out. Of and I don't think if if the

0:23:47.200 --> 0:23:49.119
<v Speaker 1>Packers don't turn the ball over, I don't think they

0:23:49.200 --> 0:23:51.680
<v Speaker 1>lose the NFC title game. So I'm gonna say the

0:23:51.760 --> 0:23:55.000
<v Speaker 1>same thing if if Patrick Mahomes, if the Kansas City Chiefs,

0:23:55.040 --> 0:23:58.560
<v Speaker 1>if that offense doesn't turn the football over, I think

0:23:58.560 --> 0:24:00.359
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna be able to put up plenty of points

0:24:00.440 --> 0:24:03.080
<v Speaker 1>to to to win this game by multiple scores. That's

0:24:03.160 --> 0:24:05.000
<v Speaker 1>just that, That's just how I see it. Yeah, I

0:24:05.080 --> 0:24:07.760
<v Speaker 1>agree with And that is one thing I'm glad you

0:24:08.080 --> 0:24:10.000
<v Speaker 1>mentioned that because when I was if you go back

0:24:10.040 --> 0:24:12.720
<v Speaker 1>to all of our stuff the week before the Buccaneers game,

0:24:12.760 --> 0:24:15.119
<v Speaker 1>I wasn't at least the best of my knowledge. I

0:24:15.160 --> 0:24:16.560
<v Speaker 1>don't think I was saying, hey, they got to win

0:24:16.600 --> 0:24:19.440
<v Speaker 1>the turnover differential. No, the Packers needed to not turn

0:24:19.520 --> 0:24:21.359
<v Speaker 1>over the football. That's what I was saying to I

0:24:21.600 --> 0:24:24.920
<v Speaker 1>would have taken zero zero in the NFC Championship game,

0:24:25.000 --> 0:24:28.239
<v Speaker 1>just like the Rams game. Right, if the turnovers are

0:24:28.320 --> 0:24:31.080
<v Speaker 1>zero zero, I think the Packers would have had the edge.

0:24:31.240 --> 0:24:33.720
<v Speaker 1>And uh and one screen Bay started to turn the

0:24:33.760 --> 0:24:36.280
<v Speaker 1>ball over, it just everything with the game got thrown

0:24:36.320 --> 0:24:38.800
<v Speaker 1>out of whack and and it didn't becoming the type

0:24:38.840 --> 0:24:40.960
<v Speaker 1>of game the Packers wanted to play. Yeah, and and

0:24:41.200 --> 0:24:44.160
<v Speaker 1>now again Mahomes did have some turnovers in December. We'll

0:24:44.200 --> 0:24:45.959
<v Speaker 1>have to see if if you know, the Bucks can

0:24:45.960 --> 0:24:49.480
<v Speaker 1>be opportunistic here. But I just I just think Tampa

0:24:49.560 --> 0:24:51.680
<v Speaker 1>Bay needs to play a perfect game and I think

0:24:51.760 --> 0:24:54.000
<v Speaker 1>Kansas City can win it even if they don't. So

0:24:55.240 --> 0:24:57.120
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be a great battle though, because again, much

0:24:57.160 --> 0:24:59.120
<v Speaker 1>like I was building up with the NFC title game,

0:24:59.359 --> 0:25:01.520
<v Speaker 1>there is an interes inesting storyline here. Either you're gonna

0:25:01.520 --> 0:25:04.879
<v Speaker 1>have Kansas City beginning the you know, the beginnings of

0:25:04.960 --> 0:25:07.640
<v Speaker 1>a dynasty. Being able to go back to back would

0:25:07.640 --> 0:25:09.720
<v Speaker 1>be a huge accomplishment, very difficult to do in the

0:25:09.800 --> 0:25:12.840
<v Speaker 1>National Football League. Nobody, nobody's done it since Tom Brady

0:25:13.080 --> 0:25:15.840
<v Speaker 1>and back in oh three oh four with New England Patriots.

0:25:15.840 --> 0:25:17.800
<v Speaker 1>It hasn't happened in this league for a long time.

0:25:18.080 --> 0:25:19.879
<v Speaker 1>And and on the other side of it, you have

0:25:19.960 --> 0:25:21.880
<v Speaker 1>Tom Brady trying to win a Super Bowl at age

0:25:21.920 --> 0:25:24.399
<v Speaker 1>forty three with a new football team after twenty one

0:25:24.480 --> 0:25:27.359
<v Speaker 1>seasons with with New England. So that that way it

0:25:27.400 --> 0:25:29.240
<v Speaker 1>will be really interesting. And hey, Mike, I know your

0:25:29.280 --> 0:25:31.960
<v Speaker 1>big weekend fan. You get a weekend performance out of

0:25:32.000 --> 0:25:35.880
<v Speaker 1>this too, So congratulations. All right, thanks very much. Well,

0:25:36.000 --> 0:25:38.320
<v Speaker 1>with that, we are going to sign off on this

0:25:38.560 --> 0:25:42.119
<v Speaker 1>edition of Packers Unscripted and has, as West suggested a

0:25:42.160 --> 0:25:44.520
<v Speaker 1>moment ago, we're going to go on a little bit

0:25:44.560 --> 0:25:47.920
<v Speaker 1>of an indefinite hiatus here with PTO season. Yeah, we

0:25:48.040 --> 0:25:50.440
<v Speaker 1>both need to get some vacation time in. We're both

0:25:50.480 --> 0:25:51.960
<v Speaker 1>going to be in and out of the office, so

0:25:52.520 --> 0:25:54.800
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna shut it down for a while. We will

0:25:54.840 --> 0:25:57.440
<v Speaker 1>be back, trust me. Um, I'm just not gonna say

0:25:57.560 --> 0:26:01.200
<v Speaker 1>exactly when. It's a surprise. Yeah, So stay tuned to

0:26:01.280 --> 0:26:03.959
<v Speaker 1>Packers dot com and and all of your all your

0:26:04.040 --> 0:26:08.000
<v Speaker 1>podcast notifications for when we do come back. But whenever

0:26:08.119 --> 0:26:10.560
<v Speaker 1>that is, we will see you then. For Wes, I

0:26:10.680 --> 0:26:13.480
<v Speaker 1>am Mike, thank you for tuning in. Everybody, take care.