WEBVTT - Chuck’s Commentary - From Teflon To Velcro: Why The Epstein Files Could Trigger Trump’s Lame Duck Presidency + Mike Johnson Has Put Republicans In A Terrible Spot

0:00:00.040 --> 0:00:02.640
<v Speaker 1>Do you hate hangovers, We'll say goodbye to hangovers. Out

0:00:02.640 --> 0:00:05.160
<v Speaker 1>of Office gives you the social buzz without the next

0:00:05.240 --> 0:00:07.560
<v Speaker 1>day regret. Their best selling out of Office gummies were

0:00:07.560 --> 0:00:10.479
<v Speaker 1>designed to provide a mild, relaxing buzz, boost your mood,

0:00:10.560 --> 0:00:14.120
<v Speaker 1>and enhance creativity and relaxation. With five different strengths, you

0:00:14.160 --> 0:00:16.360
<v Speaker 1>can tailor the dose to fit your vibe, from a

0:00:16.440 --> 0:00:20.520
<v Speaker 1>gentle one point five milligram micro dose to their newest

0:00:20.640 --> 0:00:24.599
<v Speaker 1>fifteen milligram gummy for a more elevated experience. Their THHC

0:00:24.760 --> 0:00:28.159
<v Speaker 1>beverages and gummies are a modern, mindful alternative to a

0:00:28.160 --> 0:00:30.680
<v Speaker 1>glass of wine or a cocktail. And I'll tell you this,

0:00:30.920 --> 0:00:33.879
<v Speaker 1>I've given up booze. I don't like the hangovers. I

0:00:34.120 --> 0:00:37.519
<v Speaker 1>prefer the gummy experience. Soul is a wellness brand that

0:00:37.560 --> 0:00:41.040
<v Speaker 1>believes feeling good should be fun and easy. Soul specializes

0:00:41.080 --> 0:00:44.760
<v Speaker 1>in delicious HEMP derived THHC and CBD products, all designed

0:00:44.760 --> 0:00:47.839
<v Speaker 1>to boost your mood and simply help you unwine so

0:00:47.880 --> 0:00:50.120
<v Speaker 1>if you struggle to switch off at night, Soul also

0:00:50.200 --> 0:00:53.200
<v Speaker 1>has a variety of products specifically designed to just simply

0:00:53.200 --> 0:00:55.680
<v Speaker 1>help you get a better night's sleep, including their top

0:00:55.760 --> 0:00:59.840
<v Speaker 1>selling Sleepy gummies. It's a fan favorite for deep restorative sleep.

0:01:00.120 --> 0:01:02.280
<v Speaker 1>So bring on the good vibes and treat yourself to

0:01:02.360 --> 0:01:06.120
<v Speaker 1>Soul today. Right now, Soul is offering my audience thirty

0:01:06.160 --> 0:01:09.000
<v Speaker 1>percent off your entire order. So go to get sold

0:01:09.040 --> 0:01:13.319
<v Speaker 1>dot Com use the promo code podcast. Don't forget that code.

0:01:13.440 --> 0:01:18.160
<v Speaker 1>That's getsold dot Com promo code toodcast for thirty percent off.

0:01:21.560 --> 0:01:24.080
<v Speaker 1>Hello there, Happy Thursday. Welcome to another episode of the

0:01:24.160 --> 0:01:28.720
<v Speaker 1>Chuck Podcast. I got a loaded show for you today.

0:01:28.720 --> 0:01:31.920
<v Speaker 1>We're going to obviously tackle the question and I've gotten

0:01:31.920 --> 0:01:35.559
<v Speaker 1>a thousand times today from various walks of life, which

0:01:35.640 --> 0:01:39.080
<v Speaker 1>is do these Epstein emails mean something more on Trump?

0:01:39.160 --> 0:01:41.640
<v Speaker 1>Is this going to? Is this problem we're going to

0:01:41.680 --> 0:01:45.040
<v Speaker 1>tell We're going to dive into that barely deep here. Then,

0:01:45.080 --> 0:01:46.920
<v Speaker 1>of course after I'll do a little few more q

0:01:47.040 --> 0:01:50.120
<v Speaker 1>and as, and I'll have my big college football preview

0:01:50.800 --> 0:01:53.960
<v Speaker 1>going into the weekend. But I want to start, obviously

0:01:54.000 --> 0:01:59.480
<v Speaker 1>with this question, and look, the world of independent media,

0:01:59.560 --> 0:02:01.960
<v Speaker 1>the world of content creators. Right, we are in an

0:02:01.960 --> 0:02:05.800
<v Speaker 1>Epstein frenzy, and it's a deserved sort of feeding frenzy

0:02:05.840 --> 0:02:07.640
<v Speaker 1>of the moment because there's new material out there, right

0:02:07.680 --> 0:02:10.640
<v Speaker 1>there's new emails, there's new shock emails, and the and

0:02:10.680 --> 0:02:14.240
<v Speaker 1>the swearing in of Adelita Garalva, the Arizona congresswoman who's

0:02:14.240 --> 0:02:16.640
<v Speaker 1>been waiting to be sworn in for over a month

0:02:16.720 --> 0:02:20.720
<v Speaker 1>now because of the Speaker Johnson's bizarre decision to keep

0:02:20.720 --> 0:02:24.040
<v Speaker 1>the House out. I really think he really did a

0:02:24.040 --> 0:02:26.240
<v Speaker 1>disservice to his own party and his own members here,

0:02:26.280 --> 0:02:29.000
<v Speaker 1>because it's a pretty indefensible you know, the lack of

0:02:29.320 --> 0:02:31.800
<v Speaker 1>the lack of action, the lack of anything from the

0:02:31.800 --> 0:02:35.320
<v Speaker 1>House Republicans, and they're running. They're on the ballot before

0:02:35.320 --> 0:02:38.239
<v Speaker 1>anybody else, is right, it's the House Republicans are all

0:02:38.280 --> 0:02:40.360
<v Speaker 1>on the ballot come in November twenty twenty six. And

0:02:40.639 --> 0:02:43.480
<v Speaker 1>I think Mike Johnson has put his own members in

0:02:43.520 --> 0:02:49.040
<v Speaker 1>a terrible situation. Obviously, he made a it feels like

0:02:49.120 --> 0:02:51.040
<v Speaker 1>he made a decision that the White House has him

0:02:51.080 --> 0:02:53.960
<v Speaker 1>to do, not what was in the best interests of

0:02:54.040 --> 0:02:57.640
<v Speaker 1>the House Republicans, and you know, these in some ways,

0:02:57.520 --> 0:02:59.720
<v Speaker 1>this controversy over the Epstein file is the same thing.

0:03:01.000 --> 0:03:03.760
<v Speaker 1>Mike Johnson is consistently doing what's in the best interest

0:03:03.840 --> 0:03:06.240
<v Speaker 1>of the White House, which is a branch of government.

0:03:06.240 --> 0:03:08.880
<v Speaker 1>He does not lead, nor is he a member of

0:03:09.280 --> 0:03:11.960
<v Speaker 1>He is actually the leader of the legislative branch. The

0:03:11.960 --> 0:03:14.480
<v Speaker 1>Speaker of the House is essentially the de facto leader

0:03:14.560 --> 0:03:17.160
<v Speaker 1>of that branch of government. Same way John Roberts as

0:03:17.160 --> 0:03:19.480
<v Speaker 1>the Chief Justice, is essentially the current leader of the

0:03:19.520 --> 0:03:27.959
<v Speaker 1>judiciary branch, and he is essentially outsourced decision making on

0:03:28.520 --> 0:03:32.480
<v Speaker 1>what Congress should do to the White House. You get it. Politically,

0:03:33.000 --> 0:03:35.320
<v Speaker 1>I understand why they feel like they have to, and

0:03:35.320 --> 0:03:38.320
<v Speaker 1>we live in this jerrymandered world where primary voters matter

0:03:38.400 --> 0:03:41.240
<v Speaker 1>more than the rest of us. But I will tell you,

0:03:41.280 --> 0:03:43.960
<v Speaker 1>I think what Mike Johnson has done with House Republicans

0:03:44.040 --> 0:03:47.080
<v Speaker 1>is so damaging, and I do not think they fully

0:03:47.080 --> 0:03:52.560
<v Speaker 1>appreciate how much damage he's His decisions here again all

0:03:53.320 --> 0:03:56.480
<v Speaker 1>were only to the benefit of one person, Donald Trump.

0:03:56.920 --> 0:03:58.840
<v Speaker 1>None of it to the benefit of anybody that's actually

0:03:58.840 --> 0:04:02.280
<v Speaker 1>going to be on the ballot, namely every single one

0:04:02.320 --> 0:04:07.200
<v Speaker 1>of those House Republicans that he is charged with leading.

0:04:07.920 --> 0:04:10.640
<v Speaker 1>So the discharge position is here. It's interesting that the

0:04:10.680 --> 0:04:13.200
<v Speaker 1>White House apparently was working Lauren Bobert seeing if they

0:04:13.200 --> 0:04:15.560
<v Speaker 1>could talk her out of being a signer, trying to

0:04:16.440 --> 0:04:20.280
<v Speaker 1>do whatever they can to stop this, and I think that.

0:04:20.560 --> 0:04:24.840
<v Speaker 1>You know, the question is will this You know this

0:04:24.920 --> 0:04:28.400
<v Speaker 1>is a guy you know Axis Hollywood didn't end him.

0:04:28.680 --> 0:04:32.039
<v Speaker 1>January six didn't end him. I mean, look at the

0:04:32.120 --> 0:04:35.960
<v Speaker 1>things he has done since coming into office. I mean,

0:04:36.640 --> 0:04:38.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to give you a quick rundown. These are

0:04:39.000 --> 0:04:43.039
<v Speaker 1>just the people he pardoned on January sixth that have

0:04:43.160 --> 0:04:46.840
<v Speaker 1>committed crimes since right and none of this has hit

0:04:46.880 --> 0:04:50.360
<v Speaker 1>him yet. Edward Kelly, pardoned for January sixth, later convicted

0:04:50.400 --> 0:04:54.200
<v Speaker 1>to conspiring to murder FBI agents. Daniel Charles Ball was

0:04:54.240 --> 0:04:57.720
<v Speaker 1>pardoned in the January sixth pardons, and he was rearrested

0:04:57.760 --> 0:05:00.919
<v Speaker 1>on federal gun charges. Kyle kle Elton was pardoned with

0:05:00.960 --> 0:05:03.560
<v Speaker 1>his January sixth participation, later had to be indicted for

0:05:03.680 --> 0:05:09.080
<v Speaker 1>receiving child pornography. Christopher moynihan was pardoned for the January

0:05:09.080 --> 0:05:11.560
<v Speaker 1>sixth pardons, and in October twenty twenty five with charge

0:05:11.560 --> 0:05:14.480
<v Speaker 1>of threatening to kill the House Democratic leader Aqim Jeffreys.

0:05:14.680 --> 0:05:17.680
<v Speaker 1>And then there's Robert Packer pardon another January sixth partony

0:05:18.360 --> 0:05:20.919
<v Speaker 1>in September of twenty twenty five charge in connection with

0:05:20.960 --> 0:05:25.160
<v Speaker 1>a dog attack that left four people injured. So people,

0:05:25.200 --> 0:05:27.800
<v Speaker 1>he's pardoned have gone on to commit more crimes and

0:05:27.839 --> 0:05:32.320
<v Speaker 1>have become menaces to society. Never mind the other pardons

0:05:32.360 --> 0:05:36.080
<v Speaker 1>he's done of some really questionable figures, like the one

0:05:36.080 --> 0:05:38.320
<v Speaker 1>where it looks like he sold the pardon with Sheng

0:05:38.400 --> 0:05:42.719
<v Speaker 1>Peng Xiao, the finance founder. That guy's in business with

0:05:42.800 --> 0:05:45.719
<v Speaker 1>his sons and he magically gets a pardon. I wonder

0:05:45.760 --> 0:05:50.560
<v Speaker 1>how that worked. This guy apparently had billions and illicit transactions,

0:05:51.680 --> 0:05:54.400
<v Speaker 1>and it was Trump's Department of Justice the first term

0:05:54.440 --> 0:05:59.840
<v Speaker 1>that actually prosecuted him. But we digress. George Santos, the

0:06:00.040 --> 0:06:04.640
<v Speaker 1>serial liar who defrauded voters, defrauded Congress, did all sorts

0:06:04.680 --> 0:06:10.120
<v Speaker 1>of things. He gets pardoned. Ed Martin, who who handles

0:06:10.120 --> 0:06:13.640
<v Speaker 1>his pardons, he gets pardoned. He got convicted of financial crimes,

0:06:13.920 --> 0:06:17.599
<v Speaker 1>misusing nonprofit funds, and he gets pardoned, and of course

0:06:17.720 --> 0:06:22.640
<v Speaker 1>I think works for Trump. Denesh Desuza, who is traffics

0:06:22.680 --> 0:06:26.400
<v Speaker 1>and made up Propa Canada with his Mules movie and

0:06:26.480 --> 0:06:29.719
<v Speaker 1>all this stuff, well, he was convicted of illegal of

0:06:29.800 --> 0:06:33.960
<v Speaker 1>the straw donor scheme. He received clemency. A couple of

0:06:34.000 --> 0:06:40.560
<v Speaker 1>other crypto fraud financiers that he's pardoned ever since. So

0:06:41.400 --> 0:06:44.359
<v Speaker 1>he's got and I say this, none of this stuff

0:06:44.400 --> 0:06:47.080
<v Speaker 1>has mattered, right, I throw all that out there. All

0:06:47.080 --> 0:06:49.560
<v Speaker 1>of this happened this year. He's you know, did the

0:06:50.120 --> 0:06:54.800
<v Speaker 1>bailout of Argentina instead of bailing out US beef producers.

0:06:56.000 --> 0:06:57.800
<v Speaker 1>None of this has hit him, stuck to him yet,

0:06:58.560 --> 0:07:01.760
<v Speaker 1>So why should the Epstein files stick to him? Well,

0:07:01.800 --> 0:07:04.320
<v Speaker 1>there's another way to look at this is that there

0:07:04.360 --> 0:07:07.240
<v Speaker 1>are times in any presidency where you have Teflon as

0:07:07.240 --> 0:07:10.120
<v Speaker 1>a president, and there are times in every presidency where

0:07:10.160 --> 0:07:13.560
<v Speaker 1>it feels like you're dressed in velcrow. There was, you know,

0:07:13.840 --> 0:07:18.520
<v Speaker 1>Richard Nixon had Teflon in his first term. By the

0:07:18.560 --> 0:07:21.120
<v Speaker 1>second term, it was all velcrow and everything that was

0:07:21.160 --> 0:07:24.800
<v Speaker 1>connected to Watergate or loosely connected to Watergate or any

0:07:24.880 --> 0:07:28.160
<v Speaker 1>sort of presidential abuse of power seemed to stick to

0:07:28.240 --> 0:07:30.960
<v Speaker 1>him and stick to him. But why did he go

0:07:31.080 --> 0:07:37.120
<v Speaker 1>from a Teflon guy to a velcrow guy? A simple reason.

0:07:37.200 --> 0:07:44.440
<v Speaker 1>The economy sucked. Why did Bill Clinton not get essentially

0:07:44.480 --> 0:07:48.600
<v Speaker 1>punished by the political system or by voters when it

0:07:48.640 --> 0:07:53.160
<v Speaker 1>came to Monica Lewinsky, the economy was great. Why did

0:07:53.200 --> 0:07:56.280
<v Speaker 1>the stuff in Trump's first term not stick to him?

0:07:56.640 --> 0:08:00.000
<v Speaker 1>There was a perception that he oversaw a successful economy

0:08:00.280 --> 0:08:07.080
<v Speaker 1>pre coronavirus. Why is this possible that this time he's

0:08:07.440 --> 0:08:10.120
<v Speaker 1>and this is why could this time be different? Because

0:08:10.560 --> 0:08:13.960
<v Speaker 1>too many people in this country think this economy sucks. Because,

0:08:14.000 --> 0:08:18.000
<v Speaker 1>as we've discussed, if you have money, you're doing okay.

0:08:18.080 --> 0:08:22.760
<v Speaker 1>If you don't have money, you're struggling. You're barely out

0:08:22.760 --> 0:08:25.800
<v Speaker 1>of you're barely above water. You're seeing your electric bill

0:08:25.840 --> 0:08:28.200
<v Speaker 1>go up, You're seeing the grocery bills go up. You're

0:08:28.240 --> 0:08:32.040
<v Speaker 1>seeing everything in your life go up in price. Trust me,

0:08:32.320 --> 0:08:35.439
<v Speaker 1>even if you have some savings, you're seeing everything go up. Right,

0:08:35.480 --> 0:08:38.800
<v Speaker 1>The cost of everything has gone up and feels like

0:08:38.840 --> 0:08:42.320
<v Speaker 1>it's going up substantially, particularly when you look at electricity.

0:08:43.160 --> 0:08:47.920
<v Speaker 1>So you know, Epstein's been out there as an issue

0:08:47.920 --> 0:08:53.320
<v Speaker 1>for Trump arguably for years. The question is when does

0:08:53.360 --> 0:08:56.640
<v Speaker 1>it does a you know, why would it matter this

0:08:56.720 --> 0:08:59.959
<v Speaker 1>time more than before. You can say, well, there's more

0:09:00.200 --> 0:09:03.120
<v Speaker 1>evidence that connects him that he knew something. I definitely

0:09:03.160 --> 0:09:05.439
<v Speaker 1>think there's always going to be but you could make

0:09:05.440 --> 0:09:09.360
<v Speaker 1>the argument you kind of knew right, Like there's this

0:09:09.400 --> 0:09:12.880
<v Speaker 1>great quote from JD. Vance that actually which was you know,

0:09:12.960 --> 0:09:16.640
<v Speaker 1>there's always a tweet right, this is JD. Vance Saraha

0:09:16.679 --> 0:09:19.000
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and one, So you'll be forgiven. I know

0:09:19.040 --> 0:09:21.400
<v Speaker 1>the way. You have to go way back in his past,

0:09:21.559 --> 0:09:30.560
<v Speaker 1>right some four whole years ago. But the quote, and

0:09:30.600 --> 0:09:33.160
<v Speaker 1>I just want to get it directly here. I had

0:09:33.160 --> 0:09:36.760
<v Speaker 1>it up. Remember this is him. He was a tweet

0:09:36.800 --> 0:09:38.960
<v Speaker 1>he made in twenty twenty one. Remember when we learned

0:09:38.960 --> 0:09:41.640
<v Speaker 1>that our wealthiest and most powerful people were connected to

0:09:41.640 --> 0:09:45.080
<v Speaker 1>a guy who ran a literal child sex trafficking ring,

0:09:45.480 --> 0:09:48.840
<v Speaker 1>and then that guy died mysteriously in jail, and now

0:09:48.880 --> 0:09:52.320
<v Speaker 1>we just don't talk about it. Of course, that was

0:09:52.320 --> 0:09:55.000
<v Speaker 1>when there was a democratic administration that he did tweet

0:09:55.000 --> 0:09:57.520
<v Speaker 1>this right number one, And that was back when the

0:09:57.640 --> 0:10:00.440
<v Speaker 1>right was convinced this was a cover up having to

0:10:00.440 --> 0:10:03.960
<v Speaker 1>do with Bill Clinton. But of course Jeffrey Epstein's closest

0:10:03.960 --> 0:10:09.560
<v Speaker 1>friend was not Bill Clinton. It was Donald Trump. And

0:10:09.880 --> 0:10:12.600
<v Speaker 1>with a the point I'm making here is do I

0:10:12.640 --> 0:10:17.520
<v Speaker 1>think Trump could Jedi mind trick his way out of this? Well,

0:10:17.559 --> 0:10:19.800
<v Speaker 1>he has for a long time. And why has he

0:10:19.920 --> 0:10:22.800
<v Speaker 1>Well there's been other things. There's been And again I

0:10:22.840 --> 0:10:25.079
<v Speaker 1>go back to the first term, even when Jeffrey Epstein

0:10:25.120 --> 0:10:28.960
<v Speaker 1>was in custody, even when this whole thing consumed a

0:10:29.280 --> 0:10:33.600
<v Speaker 1>cabinet secretary of his who had to essentially drop because

0:10:33.640 --> 0:10:37.959
<v Speaker 1>of his lenient sentencing that he oversaw down in South Florida.

0:10:38.880 --> 0:10:42.559
<v Speaker 1>It was because the perception, well, yeah, we knew all this,

0:10:42.559 --> 0:10:44.800
<v Speaker 1>this was all baked in. We kind of knew Trump

0:10:44.880 --> 0:10:48.840
<v Speaker 1>was this. And this is why in some ways people

0:10:48.880 --> 0:10:51.719
<v Speaker 1>already know. Remember when we learned that our wealthiest and

0:10:51.800 --> 0:10:54.240
<v Speaker 1>most powerful people were connected to a guy hard Stop.

0:10:54.880 --> 0:10:59.120
<v Speaker 1>So that's problem Number one for Trump is that Trump

0:10:59.160 --> 0:11:02.040
<v Speaker 1>has made it clear he's been part of the establishment,

0:11:02.120 --> 0:11:04.679
<v Speaker 1>part of the elite. He knows everybody, He knows all

0:11:04.760 --> 0:11:08.520
<v Speaker 1>these guys, he's been there. He himself has quotes of him,

0:11:08.960 --> 0:11:13.080
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, Jeffrey likes him young, and he knows. There's

0:11:13.080 --> 0:11:14.960
<v Speaker 1>that other quote that's floating around where he said, man,

0:11:15.040 --> 0:11:17.200
<v Speaker 1>it was the nineties, a lot of crazy stuff was happening.

0:11:17.240 --> 0:11:19.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't remember, which is always code for I don't

0:11:19.920 --> 0:11:21.640
<v Speaker 1>want to talk about what I might know, or what

0:11:21.720 --> 0:11:23.680
<v Speaker 1>I might have seen, or what I might have participated in.

0:11:25.120 --> 0:11:27.080
<v Speaker 1>The Point is, it isn't going to be hard for

0:11:27.120 --> 0:11:29.960
<v Speaker 1>people to believe that he had a relationship with Epstein,

0:11:30.040 --> 0:11:35.080
<v Speaker 1>that he was close with him. The difference is they're

0:11:35.120 --> 0:11:38.480
<v Speaker 1>pissed off about he's not doing what he promised to

0:11:38.480 --> 0:11:41.760
<v Speaker 1>do as president, which is bring down the costs. They're

0:11:41.800 --> 0:11:46.199
<v Speaker 1>doing anything. But if anything, his policies have hurt you, right,

0:11:46.520 --> 0:11:48.559
<v Speaker 1>it is the price of coffee is up, not down.

0:11:48.960 --> 0:11:50.960
<v Speaker 1>Notice the Treasury Secretary says, we're going to lower the

0:11:50.960 --> 0:11:54.200
<v Speaker 1>price of coffee. We're going to lower the price of fruit. Translation,

0:11:54.520 --> 0:11:58.880
<v Speaker 1>they realize these tariffs actually impacted everyday people. And when

0:11:58.960 --> 0:12:04.400
<v Speaker 1>you teariff Brazil over a political obsession of yours, all

0:12:04.440 --> 0:12:09.040
<v Speaker 1>you do is attack all Americans in their pocketbook because

0:12:09.080 --> 0:12:16.920
<v Speaker 1>of the price of coffee. So I'm always has it

0:12:17.000 --> 0:12:20.560
<v Speaker 1>in to assume, ah, this is it. But look, every

0:12:20.679 --> 0:12:24.280
<v Speaker 1>presidency comes to an end and their influence comes to

0:12:24.280 --> 0:12:28.280
<v Speaker 1>an end. And the way we mark the end of

0:12:28.320 --> 0:12:31.000
<v Speaker 1>a presidency as we say, oh, he's becoming a lame duck.

0:12:31.800 --> 0:12:34.960
<v Speaker 1>And you're starting to hear the words lame duck. I

0:12:34.960 --> 0:12:37.560
<v Speaker 1>think when you measure when does a president become every

0:12:37.559 --> 0:12:39.719
<v Speaker 1>president becomes a lame duck. The question is when does

0:12:39.720 --> 0:12:43.240
<v Speaker 1>it begin. Well, trying to figure out when a presidency

0:12:43.320 --> 0:12:45.640
<v Speaker 1>is an official lame duck status is like trying to

0:12:45.720 --> 0:12:51.320
<v Speaker 1>guess when we're in recession. Right. There's a great line

0:12:51.320 --> 0:12:53.720
<v Speaker 1>about economists with recessions, they can always tell you when

0:12:53.760 --> 0:12:57.280
<v Speaker 1>it started. After the recession has started, there's not a

0:12:57.320 --> 0:13:00.520
<v Speaker 1>single economist that can tell you when it's going to begin. Right.

0:13:00.559 --> 0:13:02.240
<v Speaker 1>They never tell you when it's going to be, and

0:13:02.520 --> 0:13:05.440
<v Speaker 1>we always are. We're always informed of when it began.

0:13:06.520 --> 0:13:09.160
<v Speaker 1>I actually think there's the same thing with when it

0:13:09.200 --> 0:13:15.520
<v Speaker 1>comes to a lame duck presidency. Is this begun? Are

0:13:15.520 --> 0:13:17.439
<v Speaker 1>we in the midst of it? Are we at the

0:13:17.480 --> 0:13:19.480
<v Speaker 1>beginning of it? We're not going to know for sure,

0:13:19.520 --> 0:13:22.720
<v Speaker 1>I think for about six months or a year. But

0:13:22.800 --> 0:13:26.160
<v Speaker 1>I'll tell you this if if we fast forward a

0:13:26.200 --> 0:13:28.280
<v Speaker 1>year and the Democrats sweep the House in the Senate,

0:13:28.679 --> 0:13:31.160
<v Speaker 1>which to me, you know and you're going to hear

0:13:31.200 --> 0:13:33.199
<v Speaker 1>this actually in the Adam Jenlsen interview, and I think

0:13:33.240 --> 0:13:36.839
<v Speaker 1>he sets this bar correctly, which is, if Democrats don't

0:13:36.840 --> 0:13:39.200
<v Speaker 1>win the Senate, they don't win the mid terms. Right.

0:13:39.360 --> 0:13:44.360
<v Speaker 1>Winning the House is simply participating, right, that's table stakes.

0:13:44.840 --> 0:13:47.160
<v Speaker 1>Winning the Senate means you won an argument, You won

0:13:47.240 --> 0:13:50.200
<v Speaker 1>the campaign because you convinced people who normally aren't on

0:13:50.240 --> 0:13:54.320
<v Speaker 1>your side to be on your side. That's winning right,

0:13:54.640 --> 0:13:58.760
<v Speaker 1>Winning the House is simply participating. Winning the House is

0:13:58.800 --> 0:14:01.680
<v Speaker 1>a participation trophy. Winning the Senate is winning the midterms.

0:14:02.600 --> 0:14:04.640
<v Speaker 1>So a year from now, if we're in a situation

0:14:04.720 --> 0:14:07.040
<v Speaker 1>where we say the Democrats swept the House in the Senate,

0:14:07.679 --> 0:14:10.679
<v Speaker 1>we will then go back and say Donald Trump's lame

0:14:10.800 --> 0:14:15.480
<v Speaker 1>duck presidency hit lame ducks status election Day twenty twenty five,

0:14:15.920 --> 0:14:19.440
<v Speaker 1>and arguably it probably happened a bit sooner. We might

0:14:19.520 --> 0:14:24.120
<v Speaker 1>say that essentially the symbolic beginning of his lame duckness

0:14:24.400 --> 0:14:27.120
<v Speaker 1>was the destruction of the East Wing when he became

0:14:27.320 --> 0:14:33.880
<v Speaker 1>so consumed with his personal legacy and he stopped worrying

0:14:33.920 --> 0:14:38.440
<v Speaker 1>about the American voter. Right. Look, Donald Trump's history is

0:14:39.160 --> 0:14:41.640
<v Speaker 1>he wants to get everything he can out of you

0:14:42.000 --> 0:14:45.760
<v Speaker 1>that benefits him, and once he drains, once you've given

0:14:45.800 --> 0:14:49.280
<v Speaker 1>him everything he can get out of you, he moves on. Right.

0:14:49.480 --> 0:14:52.000
<v Speaker 1>My substeck this week is about how I think I

0:14:52.000 --> 0:14:55.600
<v Speaker 1>think he has treated the Republican Party the way he

0:14:55.680 --> 0:15:00.600
<v Speaker 1>treated many of the casinos that he operated or businesses

0:15:00.600 --> 0:15:03.920
<v Speaker 1>that he's run, which is he essentially leveraged it for

0:15:03.960 --> 0:15:07.880
<v Speaker 1>his benefit, left this entity with a huge debt. In

0:15:07.920 --> 0:15:10.880
<v Speaker 1>this case, the debt he has left him as moral

0:15:11.080 --> 0:15:16.640
<v Speaker 1>and ethical bankruptcy, and then he's gonna walk away. Meanwhile,

0:15:16.680 --> 0:15:18.560
<v Speaker 1>the Republican Party is going to be the pardon of

0:15:20.320 --> 0:15:22.680
<v Speaker 1>shitty pardons, is going to be the party of that

0:15:22.800 --> 0:15:24.920
<v Speaker 1>doesn't care about the rule of law unless it applies

0:15:24.960 --> 0:15:27.800
<v Speaker 1>only to the other side, like he is gonna that

0:15:27.840 --> 0:15:31.600
<v Speaker 1>they're part of that. The legacy is somehow the Republican

0:15:31.640 --> 0:15:34.640
<v Speaker 1>Party is the party of crypto scammers. Like that's not

0:15:34.760 --> 0:15:37.280
<v Speaker 1>a good legacy. And then you throw in Epstein here

0:15:37.640 --> 0:15:43.880
<v Speaker 1>and he's the party of protecting the pedophile. This episode

0:15:43.880 --> 0:15:46.120
<v Speaker 1>of the Chuck Podcast is brought to you by Waldgrain.

0:15:46.280 --> 0:15:50.720
<v Speaker 1>Waldgrain is the first Bake from Frozen subscription box for

0:15:50.920 --> 0:15:55.760
<v Speaker 1>artisaal breads, seasonal pastries, and fresh pastas, plus all items

0:15:55.800 --> 0:15:59.480
<v Speaker 1>conveniently bake in twenty five minutes or less. Unlike many

0:15:59.520 --> 0:16:02.680
<v Speaker 1>store boys options, Wild Grain uses simple ingredients you can

0:16:02.720 --> 0:16:07.120
<v Speaker 1>pronounce and a slow fermentation process that can be easier

0:16:07.200 --> 0:16:10.920
<v Speaker 1>on your belly and richer in nutrients and antioxidants. Wildgrains

0:16:10.920 --> 0:16:15.040
<v Speaker 1>boxes are fully customizable. They're constantly adding seasonal and limited

0:16:15.040 --> 0:16:17.520
<v Speaker 1>tiping products for you to enjoy it. In addition to

0:16:17.560 --> 0:16:20.240
<v Speaker 1>their classic box. They now feature a gluten free box

0:16:20.480 --> 0:16:23.320
<v Speaker 1>and a plant based box. I checked out the gluten

0:16:23.360 --> 0:16:25.320
<v Speaker 1>free box and let me tell you, they have a

0:16:25.360 --> 0:16:29.720
<v Speaker 1>gluten free sourdough bread. It is. We got two loads

0:16:29.720 --> 0:16:31.800
<v Speaker 1>of it and we've done one loaf already. It's a

0:16:31.880 --> 0:16:36.160
<v Speaker 1>cranberry and almond sourdough bread. It's like the best raisin

0:16:36.200 --> 0:16:39.280
<v Speaker 1>bread you've ever had, except it's not raisin. It's great.

0:16:39.800 --> 0:16:42.640
<v Speaker 1>You're gonna love this. You know, it's hit or miss

0:16:42.640 --> 0:16:44.600
<v Speaker 1>if you mess around in the gluten free bread world.

0:16:44.840 --> 0:16:48.440
<v Speaker 1>This is a hit. Seriously. I was impressed. So look

0:16:48.480 --> 0:16:51.000
<v Speaker 1>for a limited time. Wild Grain is offering our listeners

0:16:51.080 --> 0:16:53.920
<v Speaker 1>thirty dollars off your first box, plus free croissants in

0:16:53.960 --> 0:16:57.480
<v Speaker 1>every box when you go to wildgrain dot com slash podcast.

0:16:57.680 --> 0:17:01.280
<v Speaker 1>To start your subscription, follow these instructions. Free croissants in

0:17:01.320 --> 0:17:03.880
<v Speaker 1>every box, thirty dollars off your first box when you

0:17:03.960 --> 0:17:07.480
<v Speaker 1>go to wildgrain dot com slash toodcast that's wildgrain dot

0:17:07.520 --> 0:17:11.320
<v Speaker 1>com slash toodcast, or simply use the promo code toodcast

0:17:11.640 --> 0:17:15.200
<v Speaker 1>at checkout. Always use the code, get the discount. I'm

0:17:15.200 --> 0:17:22.639
<v Speaker 1>telling you, it's excellent, excellent, right, there's nothing more the

0:17:22.640 --> 0:17:25.320
<v Speaker 1>Republican Party can do for Donald Trump, there is no

0:17:25.400 --> 0:17:29.320
<v Speaker 1>opportunity to run again. So now Donald Trump's worried about

0:17:29.320 --> 0:17:32.439
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump, and because of that, does it appears to

0:17:32.480 --> 0:17:35.040
<v Speaker 1>not even be worried about the voter anymore. And this

0:17:35.160 --> 0:17:38.639
<v Speaker 1>is where he goes from having a Teflon suit and

0:17:38.720 --> 0:17:42.200
<v Speaker 1>he was Teflon Don and he's been teflon don. Right.

0:17:42.640 --> 0:17:48.160
<v Speaker 1>You know, he can attack John McCain and not lose somebody.

0:17:48.160 --> 0:17:51.239
<v Speaker 1>He could shoot somebody apparently on Fifth Avenue and not

0:17:51.320 --> 0:17:54.600
<v Speaker 1>lose a supporter. But if this economy sucks, and if

0:17:54.640 --> 0:17:57.480
<v Speaker 1>the grocery bills, he can't Jedi mind trick away a

0:17:57.560 --> 0:18:02.320
<v Speaker 1>grocery bill. And then suddenly when that happens, and they think, well,

0:18:02.359 --> 0:18:06.320
<v Speaker 1>my life sucks, and this guy is worried more about

0:18:06.600 --> 0:18:09.200
<v Speaker 1>the East wing of the White House. Oh yeah, and

0:18:09.240 --> 0:18:13.680
<v Speaker 1>this guy protected a pedophile for decades, and this guy

0:18:13.760 --> 0:18:18.600
<v Speaker 1>is going to commute or the sentence of said pedophiles

0:18:19.840 --> 0:18:23.359
<v Speaker 1>partner in crime, literal partner in crime. And Gallainne Maxwell.

0:18:24.840 --> 0:18:29.560
<v Speaker 1>That's how this that's how this story matters, right, And

0:18:29.600 --> 0:18:32.320
<v Speaker 1>now you've got this orchestration of a series of votes

0:18:32.880 --> 0:18:35.720
<v Speaker 1>where you know Epstein is one of these few stories.

0:18:35.720 --> 0:18:41.639
<v Speaker 1>We live in this siloed information world where literally, you know,

0:18:41.920 --> 0:18:44.440
<v Speaker 1>I could say, you know, I mean, I'm gonna have

0:18:44.480 --> 0:18:47.159
<v Speaker 1>an interview with Clay Travis in a couple of weeks.

0:18:48.320 --> 0:18:50.159
<v Speaker 1>I don't think my mother knows who Clay Travis is.

0:18:50.440 --> 0:18:52.639
<v Speaker 1>And I say this with no, you know, why should

0:18:52.680 --> 0:18:55.199
<v Speaker 1>she you know? He is? He he is in a

0:18:55.280 --> 0:19:00.639
<v Speaker 1>different media ecosystem than my mother travels in. She doesn't,

0:19:00.680 --> 0:19:02.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, she watches a lot of college football, but

0:19:02.560 --> 0:19:06.040
<v Speaker 1>it happens she doesn't watch anything on Fox because Miami

0:19:06.440 --> 0:19:09.200
<v Speaker 1>doesn't ever play on Fox. They usually play on the

0:19:09.359 --> 0:19:12.480
<v Speaker 1>ESPN or ABC. So she might be aware of ESPN personalities,

0:19:12.520 --> 0:19:15.600
<v Speaker 1>but she's not aware of any Fox sports personalities, let

0:19:15.640 --> 0:19:18.760
<v Speaker 1>alone aware of his radio show or any of those things.

0:19:19.520 --> 0:19:25.040
<v Speaker 1>And Epstein's one of these stories that every every single

0:19:25.119 --> 0:19:29.639
<v Speaker 1>silo has an Epstein corner. Right, Your Maga silo has

0:19:29.640 --> 0:19:33.080
<v Speaker 1>an Epstein corner, Your sort of never Trump silo has

0:19:33.080 --> 0:19:36.520
<v Speaker 1>Epstein corners, your sort of center, your sort of mainstream

0:19:36.560 --> 0:19:39.359
<v Speaker 1>media has an Epstein corner, Your progressive wing has an

0:19:39.400 --> 0:19:43.520
<v Speaker 1>Epstein corner. Right, there is this collective interest in Epstein,

0:19:43.560 --> 0:19:46.479
<v Speaker 1>And let's be honest, why there is. It's all. You know,

0:19:46.600 --> 0:19:49.440
<v Speaker 1>at first, the rights interest in Epstein was all about

0:19:49.440 --> 0:19:54.160
<v Speaker 1>Bill Clinton. Nothing. It was always about Bill Clint. That's

0:19:54.200 --> 0:19:57.960
<v Speaker 1>how the right got fascinated by this. They were hoping

0:19:58.000 --> 0:20:01.000
<v Speaker 1>to paint and it was all these you know, democratics

0:20:01.040 --> 0:20:06.080
<v Speaker 1>are all part of this weird pedophilia conspiracy that QAnon launched.

0:20:06.119 --> 0:20:07.639
<v Speaker 1>All this, it's all sort of wrapped up in that.

0:20:09.359 --> 0:20:12.080
<v Speaker 1>And then Trump's names showed up in the Epstein files.

0:20:12.160 --> 0:20:16.240
<v Speaker 1>Right then we realized. And then Trump became a cornerstone

0:20:16.240 --> 0:20:20.840
<v Speaker 1>of Mega and sort of created somebody's created Mega, right, Certainly,

0:20:21.680 --> 0:20:23.920
<v Speaker 1>it's always a question, you know, like anything, Trump doesn't

0:20:23.920 --> 0:20:25.520
<v Speaker 1>create anything. He just sort of got in front of

0:20:25.520 --> 0:20:27.960
<v Speaker 1>a parade that was that was starting to form, and

0:20:28.000 --> 0:20:33.000
<v Speaker 1>then suddenly he became their leader and their unifier. But

0:20:33.080 --> 0:20:36.159
<v Speaker 1>here we are, and now everybody else is interested in

0:20:36.200 --> 0:20:39.040
<v Speaker 1>it because you're like, whoa, So Trump's involved in this

0:20:39.240 --> 0:20:41.520
<v Speaker 1>and this side, you know, and it's just one of

0:20:41.560 --> 0:20:45.400
<v Speaker 1>those stories that everybody's got a stake in. So this

0:20:45.440 --> 0:20:48.399
<v Speaker 1>is going to be a story that constantly, just like

0:20:48.440 --> 0:20:51.639
<v Speaker 1>the economy is right, the economy breaks through every because

0:20:51.680 --> 0:20:55.679
<v Speaker 1>you can't sort of information silo your grocery bill, you know,

0:20:55.720 --> 0:20:57.920
<v Speaker 1>there isn't a Fox News version of the Grocery Bill

0:20:57.960 --> 0:21:01.680
<v Speaker 1>or an MSNBC version of Grocery Bill. So you can't

0:21:01.680 --> 0:21:03.840
<v Speaker 1>do that with the economy, and in this unique case,

0:21:03.840 --> 0:21:06.920
<v Speaker 1>you can't do it with the Epstein story. And this

0:21:07.000 --> 0:21:10.600
<v Speaker 1>is why this feels like a very lame that this

0:21:10.680 --> 0:21:13.360
<v Speaker 1>is what lame duck. What happens to lame duck presidencies

0:21:13.480 --> 0:21:16.600
<v Speaker 1>is that they can't stop feeding frenzies anymore. You know,

0:21:16.880 --> 0:21:19.359
<v Speaker 1>this happened with George W. Bush. You know a lot

0:21:19.359 --> 0:21:21.480
<v Speaker 1>of people will say the feeding frenzies, you know, sort

0:21:21.480 --> 0:21:26.359
<v Speaker 1>of the lame duck period of the Bush presidency began

0:21:27.040 --> 0:21:30.280
<v Speaker 1>with the twenty oh six midterms. I'd actually argue, or

0:21:30.720 --> 0:21:33.359
<v Speaker 1>you could go backwards and say it began with the

0:21:33.480 --> 0:21:36.640
<v Speaker 1>Terry Schivo thing, when they went full bore on that

0:21:36.760 --> 0:21:40.800
<v Speaker 1>and the public revolted and they couldn't sort of, you know,

0:21:40.840 --> 0:21:45.720
<v Speaker 1>their typical positions didn't work, their typical media spin didn't work.

0:21:46.119 --> 0:21:48.919
<v Speaker 1>And then you realize, you know, his credibility was shot,

0:21:49.119 --> 0:21:53.200
<v Speaker 1>It was already weakening due to a rock. Terry Schivo hits.

0:21:53.240 --> 0:21:55.400
<v Speaker 1>Then Katrina happens, and then the whole thing is over.

0:21:55.880 --> 0:21:58.400
<v Speaker 1>But Katrina didn't start the lame duck period. The lame

0:21:58.440 --> 0:22:01.199
<v Speaker 1>duck period actually began at the tail at the at

0:22:01.200 --> 0:22:04.520
<v Speaker 1>the beginning of five when he started messing around with

0:22:04.680 --> 0:22:10.160
<v Speaker 1>the Shaivo business and Social security investments, et cetera. And

0:22:10.240 --> 0:22:15.240
<v Speaker 1>so that's where I think this if we're if indeed

0:22:16.160 --> 0:22:18.600
<v Speaker 1>we're able to in a year from now, really in it.

0:22:19.119 --> 0:22:21.600
<v Speaker 1>We have the environment that we have and it does

0:22:21.640 --> 0:22:24.200
<v Speaker 1>turn into a democratic suite. We will say this lame

0:22:24.280 --> 0:22:26.880
<v Speaker 1>duck period began in the fall of in the fall

0:22:26.920 --> 0:22:29.080
<v Speaker 1>of this year, just like with Joe Biden's presidency, it

0:22:29.119 --> 0:22:31.639
<v Speaker 1>turned out the beginning of the end of his presidency

0:22:31.680 --> 0:22:34.840
<v Speaker 1>happened really early in his presidency, right with the Afghanistan

0:22:34.880 --> 0:22:38.960
<v Speaker 1>withdrawal and the inability to to sort of hold anybody accountable,

0:22:39.000 --> 0:22:41.680
<v Speaker 1>fix it, explain it. And he never recovered from there.

0:22:42.119 --> 0:22:44.840
<v Speaker 1>And while because he was a first term president, you'd

0:22:44.840 --> 0:22:48.400
<v Speaker 1>never say lame duck in hindsight, you know, that's when

0:22:48.440 --> 0:22:51.679
<v Speaker 1>he lost. That's when he lost the plot and it

0:22:51.760 --> 0:22:58.120
<v Speaker 1>was and everything went downhill from there. You know. That's

0:22:58.320 --> 0:23:00.920
<v Speaker 1>I think the situation we may be living him now.

0:23:01.040 --> 0:23:04.679
<v Speaker 1>And the nightmare for the White House press shop is

0:23:04.680 --> 0:23:06.720
<v Speaker 1>is you know, Trump has not helped them at all.

0:23:06.960 --> 0:23:09.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, I would argue that he actually had a

0:23:10.480 --> 0:23:14.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, Trump's problem is going soft on Maxwell because

0:23:14.960 --> 0:23:20.240
<v Speaker 1>by going soft on Maxwell, but he is essentially confirmed

0:23:21.560 --> 0:23:24.280
<v Speaker 1>the idea that Maxwell knows some stuff, that he's friendly

0:23:24.320 --> 0:23:29.760
<v Speaker 1>with her, that he knows her, and it undermines the

0:23:29.800 --> 0:23:31.879
<v Speaker 1>story that he had sort of lived with for a

0:23:31.920 --> 0:23:34.720
<v Speaker 1>while when it came to Epstein that I that mostly

0:23:34.800 --> 0:23:39.119
<v Speaker 1>worked with his supporters, which was, yeah, I knew Jeffrey

0:23:39.160 --> 0:23:42.040
<v Speaker 1>Epstein very well, and then our relationship ended because I

0:23:42.040 --> 0:23:43.800
<v Speaker 1>didn't like what he was doing to you know, women

0:23:43.880 --> 0:23:47.240
<v Speaker 1>on my at mar A Lago. So we had this

0:23:47.320 --> 0:23:51.439
<v Speaker 1>sort of story that was that had some credibility to

0:23:51.480 --> 0:23:54.280
<v Speaker 1>it that you know, he didn't because there was it

0:23:54.359 --> 0:23:57.040
<v Speaker 1>was true he recruited apparently he recruited one of these

0:23:57.080 --> 0:24:00.720
<v Speaker 1>women from mar Alago, and Trump says kicked him out

0:24:00.720 --> 0:24:02.680
<v Speaker 1>of mar A Lago and said, you can't come back here.

0:24:03.040 --> 0:24:06.040
<v Speaker 1>Now we now learn that the reason for the real

0:24:06.080 --> 0:24:08.480
<v Speaker 1>breakup between Epstein and Trump wasn't that it was over

0:24:08.520 --> 0:24:11.680
<v Speaker 1>a piece of property in Palm Beach. We eventually learned

0:24:11.680 --> 0:24:14.800
<v Speaker 1>about that later, But he had a story that he

0:24:14.880 --> 0:24:17.320
<v Speaker 1>was feeding his supporters that yeah, I knew Epstein, and

0:24:17.320 --> 0:24:19.040
<v Speaker 1>then when I realized what he was doing, I was out.

0:24:19.480 --> 0:24:23.480
<v Speaker 1>I didn't want that Slee's bag around. Okay, then why

0:24:23.480 --> 0:24:26.080
<v Speaker 1>are you soft on Glene Maxwell. If you're so outraged

0:24:26.080 --> 0:24:29.119
<v Speaker 1>by what Jeffrey Epstein did, then your Justice Department should

0:24:29.119 --> 0:24:32.240
<v Speaker 1>have made life harder for Maxwell, not easier. But you

0:24:32.320 --> 0:24:36.159
<v Speaker 1>went soft on her, and what he did was is

0:24:36.320 --> 0:24:41.480
<v Speaker 1>essentially made it impossible to defend Trump's actions. You couldn't say,

0:24:41.720 --> 0:24:44.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, if he was as disgusted by what Epstein

0:24:44.520 --> 0:24:47.159
<v Speaker 1>did as he said, and he's as disgusted as his

0:24:47.200 --> 0:24:53.320
<v Speaker 1>supporters say they are disgusted, then this idea of leniency

0:24:53.359 --> 0:24:58.280
<v Speaker 1>on her, giving her, you know, the club fed treatment

0:24:58.359 --> 0:25:02.920
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to transferring her prison, sending your personal

0:25:02.920 --> 0:25:07.080
<v Speaker 1>attorney who happens to be the Deputy Attorney General, to

0:25:07.760 --> 0:25:11.960
<v Speaker 1>coax answers out of her, including the I never saw

0:25:12.000 --> 0:25:15.119
<v Speaker 1>anything untoward. Uh, it was so important to him to

0:25:15.200 --> 0:25:17.879
<v Speaker 1>get that on the record. But Trump seems to be

0:25:18.000 --> 0:25:21.440
<v Speaker 1>worried about something with Maxwell, when if he actually wanted

0:25:21.480 --> 0:25:25.800
<v Speaker 1>to keep his con up on Epstein, and let's assume

0:25:26.000 --> 0:25:30.639
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna assume it's a con and you know, with Trump,

0:25:31.040 --> 0:25:34.520
<v Speaker 1>it's it's hard not to assume that. So let's I'm

0:25:34.520 --> 0:25:37.760
<v Speaker 1>gonna assume it's a con. He'd have been better off

0:25:37.880 --> 0:25:40.600
<v Speaker 1>playing he said, she said with her, and said he'd

0:25:40.720 --> 0:25:43.480
<v Speaker 1>and then made life tougher on her. And and if

0:25:43.680 --> 0:25:45.760
<v Speaker 1>and if she threatened to go public with stuff, let

0:25:45.760 --> 0:25:48.840
<v Speaker 1>her go public. She's the one sitting in prison. She's

0:25:48.840 --> 0:25:51.920
<v Speaker 1>got the credibility problem. And then if you were being

0:25:51.960 --> 0:25:55.280
<v Speaker 1>tough on her and she was then pushing back, it

0:25:55.280 --> 0:25:58.240
<v Speaker 1>could simply be she's squealing. But the fact he didn't

0:25:58.240 --> 0:26:02.879
<v Speaker 1>do that right, whatever he thinks, she knows, he seems

0:26:02.920 --> 0:26:07.320
<v Speaker 1>to be fearful enough of that. It's leveraged that she's

0:26:07.359 --> 0:26:11.880
<v Speaker 1>successfully used with him and with Todd Blanche and that's

0:26:11.880 --> 0:26:15.919
<v Speaker 1>why his story falls apart. Now again, does any of

0:26:15.920 --> 0:26:22.520
<v Speaker 1>this matter politically? Well, I go back to every republican's

0:26:22.520 --> 0:26:24.639
<v Speaker 1>been carrying around Trump baggage for a long time, and

0:26:24.680 --> 0:26:27.840
<v Speaker 1>in some ways they're now used to it. But when

0:26:27.840 --> 0:26:30.560
<v Speaker 1>the economy is as bad as it is right now

0:26:30.600 --> 0:26:33.320
<v Speaker 1>for so many people, and as frustrating of an economy

0:26:33.320 --> 0:26:35.000
<v Speaker 1>as this is, and that's what it is, it's a

0:26:35.800 --> 0:26:37.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's one of these things that you can

0:26:37.720 --> 0:26:40.280
<v Speaker 1>look at it statistically and say, well, this is going well.

0:26:40.320 --> 0:26:43.560
<v Speaker 1>Like I saw a stat today that said that publicly

0:26:43.560 --> 0:26:46.080
<v Speaker 1>traded companies are having one of the best years earning

0:26:46.080 --> 0:26:48.880
<v Speaker 1>wise that we've seen. Ninety two percent of them are

0:26:48.960 --> 0:26:53.879
<v Speaker 1>reporting earnings above the normal average. And you're just like wow,

0:26:54.720 --> 0:26:58.159
<v Speaker 1>And yet jobs are decreasing, not increasing, Right, So that

0:26:58.240 --> 0:27:01.760
<v Speaker 1>means Wall Street's being rewarded for or its efficiencies in

0:27:01.800 --> 0:27:05.280
<v Speaker 1>its companies. Wall Street's being as they as a company

0:27:05.280 --> 0:27:09.000
<v Speaker 1>should you make. Your productivity is up and your labor

0:27:09.040 --> 0:27:14.040
<v Speaker 1>costs are down. Good for you investors like that, But

0:27:14.080 --> 0:27:15.720
<v Speaker 1>that means there's a whole bunch of people in this

0:27:15.800 --> 0:27:20.840
<v Speaker 1>economy not succeeding. And so that's why it's very hard

0:27:21.359 --> 0:27:24.000
<v Speaker 1>to you know, when Trump's using the stock market as

0:27:24.040 --> 0:27:26.360
<v Speaker 1>a as a as proof that his economy is doing well,

0:27:26.440 --> 0:27:29.960
<v Speaker 1>it's like, yeah, you're you're you're with the hat your

0:27:30.160 --> 0:27:33.239
<v Speaker 1>your economy is working for the haves. Your economy is

0:27:33.280 --> 0:27:36.600
<v Speaker 1>not working for the have nots. And the irony is

0:27:36.640 --> 0:27:41.600
<v Speaker 1>that he built his political coalition on the have nots

0:27:42.240 --> 0:27:45.400
<v Speaker 1>very successfully and now he doesn't seem to care about

0:27:45.400 --> 0:27:48.240
<v Speaker 1>the have nots anymore. And that's where what when these

0:27:48.600 --> 0:27:52.960
<v Speaker 1>that's when I go back to Epstein for the longest time.

0:27:53.119 --> 0:27:56.359
<v Speaker 1>It is basically run into teflon don and has slid

0:27:56.400 --> 0:27:59.480
<v Speaker 1>off of him. Well, I think it's I think he

0:27:59.560 --> 0:28:02.640
<v Speaker 1>is now has a suit of velcrow on. More things

0:28:02.640 --> 0:28:05.480
<v Speaker 1>are sticking to him than ever before. Right, you've got

0:28:05.560 --> 0:28:09.320
<v Speaker 1>sleepy eyes Trump, now that's sticking to him. You've got

0:28:09.440 --> 0:28:13.040
<v Speaker 1>the medical issues. Huh, something's going on. If he passed

0:28:13.119 --> 0:28:17.480
<v Speaker 1>his MRI. You don't pass an MRI. But congratulations, I

0:28:17.520 --> 0:28:21.479
<v Speaker 1>guess you know you're not at You don't do an

0:28:21.560 --> 0:28:25.840
<v Speaker 1>MRI unless they're wondering what, unless they can't find the

0:28:25.960 --> 0:28:29.760
<v Speaker 1>problem of something that's bothering you. So you got that.

0:28:32.040 --> 0:28:36.080
<v Speaker 1>He's just doesn't seem healthy, doesn't look healthy, doesn't behave

0:28:36.200 --> 0:28:38.800
<v Speaker 1>low And you can see he's really aged a lot

0:28:38.800 --> 0:28:41.120
<v Speaker 1>in the last six months. Go look at clips from

0:28:41.240 --> 0:28:44.280
<v Speaker 1>April and then look at clips in the last two weeks.

0:28:45.000 --> 0:28:48.160
<v Speaker 1>His voice is thinner. Maybe there are days that you

0:28:48.160 --> 0:28:50.920
<v Speaker 1>know you could just tell he there are days where

0:28:50.960 --> 0:28:53.880
<v Speaker 1>you know he's tired, and that's always a sign of aging.

0:28:53.920 --> 0:28:55.320
<v Speaker 1>And of course when you're at a certain age, and

0:28:55.360 --> 0:28:58.720
<v Speaker 1>this happened with Biden just because things are fine six

0:28:58.760 --> 0:29:01.160
<v Speaker 1>months ago, you know this is one of those things.

0:29:01.800 --> 0:29:04.680
<v Speaker 1>At some point in your late seventies early eighties, you

0:29:04.720 --> 0:29:08.920
<v Speaker 1>can you know, you don't age at a at an

0:29:08.920 --> 0:29:12.320
<v Speaker 1>equal rate. Okay, you sort of go. You have fits

0:29:12.360 --> 0:29:14.280
<v Speaker 1>and starts, and then you know, we've seen that, I've

0:29:14.280 --> 0:29:18.040
<v Speaker 1>had elderly relatives where everything's fine, and then you don't

0:29:18.040 --> 0:29:19.960
<v Speaker 1>see him for six months and you're like, holy cow,

0:29:20.040 --> 0:29:22.880
<v Speaker 1>what happened to uncle Joe? Or I have a real

0:29:22.960 --> 0:29:24.720
<v Speaker 1>uncle Joe. So no, nothing's happened to uncle Joe. I

0:29:24.720 --> 0:29:27.520
<v Speaker 1>don't want uncle Joe. That isn't about about you. I

0:29:27.560 --> 0:29:32.240
<v Speaker 1>was just using like Jane, and I'll go uncle John, Doe.

0:29:32.280 --> 0:29:34.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't have an uncle John, so I'll do uncle John.

0:29:34.680 --> 0:29:36.680
<v Speaker 1>Oh my god, what happened uncle John? Or what happened

0:29:36.680 --> 0:29:40.520
<v Speaker 1>at Jane? And you know that happens in these three

0:29:40.520 --> 0:29:42.840
<v Speaker 1>and six months. And the point is is that you know,

0:29:44.800 --> 0:29:46.800
<v Speaker 1>it's like the you know, it's like in business, your

0:29:46.800 --> 0:29:49.600
<v Speaker 1>hockey stick moment, but going the wrong way, you're going along,

0:29:49.600 --> 0:29:51.720
<v Speaker 1>you're going along and all of a sudden, yep, it's

0:29:51.760 --> 0:29:57.120
<v Speaker 1>off a cliff. It just collectively feels like he has

0:29:57.160 --> 0:30:00.520
<v Speaker 1>now got a suit of valcrow. And so if we

0:30:00.600 --> 0:30:05.000
<v Speaker 1>have essentially six weeks of every couple of days there's

0:30:05.000 --> 0:30:07.920
<v Speaker 1>an Epstein development, which now there's going to be now

0:30:07.920 --> 0:30:11.080
<v Speaker 1>that this discharge petition has happened, they're going to have

0:30:11.120 --> 0:30:13.200
<v Speaker 1>this vote at some point in the next couple of

0:30:13.240 --> 0:30:17.040
<v Speaker 1>weeks that will be there. Then you then it has

0:30:17.080 --> 0:30:19.160
<v Speaker 1>to go to the Senate. I you know, there was

0:30:19.200 --> 0:30:21.640
<v Speaker 1>a time I thought, Eh, the Senate will kill it.

0:30:22.040 --> 0:30:24.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't know anymore. Right, it's going to be an

0:30:24.600 --> 0:30:28.120
<v Speaker 1>interesting test. How many Republicans will there be thirty? Will

0:30:28.160 --> 0:30:32.480
<v Speaker 1>there be thirteen Republicans who joined forty seven Democrats to

0:30:32.720 --> 0:30:34.880
<v Speaker 1>force this release and force it on? Is you know,

0:30:34.960 --> 0:30:37.400
<v Speaker 1>for you know, have both the House and the Senate

0:30:37.440 --> 0:30:44.360
<v Speaker 1>have this? That's an interesting development. Is it a moment

0:30:45.040 --> 0:30:49.720
<v Speaker 1>where some Republicans decide, I need to show some independence

0:30:49.760 --> 0:30:53.560
<v Speaker 1>from Trump? Is this the safest place to do it? Right?

0:30:54.160 --> 0:30:56.480
<v Speaker 1>It could be the healthcare subsidies could be a way

0:30:56.480 --> 0:31:01.320
<v Speaker 1>that Republicans distance from Trump. The ruling when it comes

0:31:01.320 --> 0:31:08.080
<v Speaker 1>out likely saying that his his tariffs are unconstitutional. Is

0:31:08.120 --> 0:31:11.200
<v Speaker 1>that the moment? Is it the Epstein files? The point

0:31:11.320 --> 0:31:14.680
<v Speaker 1>is there's a lot of ways now that Republicans can

0:31:14.720 --> 0:31:19.520
<v Speaker 1>start to put some distance in a in what will

0:31:19.560 --> 0:31:22.280
<v Speaker 1>look like a baby step right, just voting against him

0:31:22.280 --> 0:31:24.680
<v Speaker 1>on Epstein, or voting against him on tariffs, or voting

0:31:24.680 --> 0:31:27.960
<v Speaker 1>against them on health care subsidies. That suddenly what is

0:31:28.000 --> 0:31:35.360
<v Speaker 1>a trickle turns into uh, you know, a rush of

0:31:35.800 --> 0:31:39.280
<v Speaker 1>you well of water coming out of the faucet, essentially

0:31:39.720 --> 0:31:44.480
<v Speaker 1>trying to get away from him. So that's how I

0:31:44.560 --> 0:31:51.200
<v Speaker 1>think this story is potentially that you know, it's it's like, javert,

0:31:51.280 --> 0:31:56.760
<v Speaker 1>do you got him? Now? You know? It's it's the accumulation,

0:31:57.000 --> 0:31:59.880
<v Speaker 1>and it's the fact because of this sour economy, he

0:32:00.000 --> 0:32:02.760
<v Speaker 1>he's now wearing a suit with velcrow on it and

0:32:02.880 --> 0:32:06.040
<v Speaker 1>more things, more of this other stuff is now going

0:32:06.080 --> 0:32:09.280
<v Speaker 1>to start to stick to him because he didn't handle

0:32:09.360 --> 0:32:12.240
<v Speaker 1>the main thing. He was elected for one reason, and

0:32:12.320 --> 0:32:19.000
<v Speaker 1>one reason only bring down costs, and he's failing massively

0:32:19.200 --> 0:32:25.080
<v Speaker 1>at that, which means every other secondary issue becomes a

0:32:25.160 --> 0:32:29.120
<v Speaker 1>problem for that voter because they think, well, he can't

0:32:29.160 --> 0:32:30.960
<v Speaker 1>do this, well, he must be that. He must be that,

0:32:31.040 --> 0:32:33.880
<v Speaker 1>he must be that. And that's why this Epstein story

0:32:34.000 --> 0:32:37.560
<v Speaker 1>could be just yet another sign that the lame duck

0:32:37.640 --> 0:32:41.680
<v Speaker 1>status is now the You know, if you were to

0:32:41.720 --> 0:32:45.160
<v Speaker 1>go to Trump's Facebook page, he should change. He may

0:32:45.200 --> 0:32:48.840
<v Speaker 1>have to change his status to lame duck. So with that,

0:32:48.920 --> 0:32:51.320
<v Speaker 1>I'll sneak at a break and we'll bring in Adam Jennisen.

0:32:54.520 --> 0:32:57.600
<v Speaker 1>There's a reason results matter more than promises, just like

0:32:57.640 --> 0:33:00.719
<v Speaker 1>there's a reason. Morgan and Morgan is America's large injury

0:33:00.800 --> 0:33:03.560
<v Speaker 1>law firm. For the last thirty five years, they've recovered

0:33:03.680 --> 0:33:06.840
<v Speaker 1>twenty five billion dollars for more than half a million clients.

0:33:07.400 --> 0:33:10.960
<v Speaker 1>It includes cases where insurance companies offered next to nothing,

0:33:11.240 --> 0:33:14.040
<v Speaker 1>just hoping to get away with paying as little as possible.

0:33:14.120 --> 0:33:17.200
<v Speaker 1>Morgan and Morgan fought back ended up winning millions. In fact,

0:33:17.280 --> 0:33:20.400
<v Speaker 1>in Pennsylvania, one client was awarded twenty six million dollars,

0:33:20.880 --> 0:33:23.920
<v Speaker 1>which was a staggering forty times the amount that the

0:33:23.960 --> 0:33:27.240
<v Speaker 1>insurance company originally offered. That original offer six hundred and

0:33:27.240 --> 0:33:30.240
<v Speaker 1>fifty thousand dollars twenty six million, six hundred and fifty

0:33:30.280 --> 0:33:32.480
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollars. So with more than one thousand lawyers across

0:33:32.520 --> 0:33:34.960
<v Speaker 1>the country, they know how to deliver for everyday people.

0:33:35.040 --> 0:33:37.760
<v Speaker 1>If you're injured, you need a lawyer, you need somebody

0:33:37.760 --> 0:33:40.320
<v Speaker 1>to get your back. Check out for Thepeople dot Com,

0:33:40.360 --> 0:33:45.520
<v Speaker 1>Slash podcast or Dow Pound Law Pound five two nine

0:33:45.720 --> 0:33:49.240
<v Speaker 1>law on your cell phone. And remember all law firms

0:33:49.240 --> 0:33:51.120
<v Speaker 1>are not the same, so check out Morgan and Morgan.

0:33:51.200 --> 0:33:56.440
<v Speaker 1>Their fee is free unless they win as check first

0:33:56.440 --> 0:34:00.080
<v Speaker 1>one comes from XW from Alexandria here in the DMVs.

0:34:00.080 --> 0:34:02.280
<v Speaker 1>I've been a fan since before you hosted me the Press.

0:34:02.640 --> 0:34:04.840
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, and I particularly enjoy your political analysis and

0:34:04.840 --> 0:34:07.040
<v Speaker 1>how you use American history explain what we are going

0:34:07.040 --> 0:34:09.560
<v Speaker 1>through towards that end. Have you watched Death by Lightning

0:34:09.600 --> 0:34:11.759
<v Speaker 1>on Netflix? I am in the middle of it. I

0:34:12.360 --> 0:34:14.839
<v Speaker 1>finished part one. It's four part series telling the story

0:34:14.840 --> 0:34:17.000
<v Speaker 1>of James Garfield's rise to the presidency after winning the

0:34:17.040 --> 0:34:19.800
<v Speaker 1>nomination on the thirty six ballot at the Republican National

0:34:19.800 --> 0:34:22.680
<v Speaker 1>Convention in eighteen eighty and his assassination after only three

0:34:22.719 --> 0:34:25.360
<v Speaker 1>months in office. It's filled with political intrigue, corruption, spoils,

0:34:25.520 --> 0:34:27.520
<v Speaker 1>and patronage near the end of the nineteenth century. Right

0:34:27.560 --> 0:34:32.040
<v Speaker 1>up your ally, Max, You're right, and I will sort

0:34:32.040 --> 0:34:34.360
<v Speaker 1>of give you a little insight here. I've been obsessed

0:34:34.400 --> 0:34:38.520
<v Speaker 1>with the Garfield story for a long time. Have a

0:34:39.480 --> 0:34:44.000
<v Speaker 1>writing partner off and on by the name of Adam Pearlman,

0:34:44.120 --> 0:34:50.000
<v Speaker 1>who has done some terrific work. Billions in particulars and

0:34:50.040 --> 0:34:53.440
<v Speaker 1>he and I have and I have a pilot script

0:34:53.960 --> 0:34:58.240
<v Speaker 1>actually that we had once been working with a major

0:34:58.280 --> 0:35:02.080
<v Speaker 1>production company and the Game of Throne guys Benny Off

0:35:02.200 --> 0:35:05.920
<v Speaker 1>and Weisse got the Netflix deal and they ended up

0:35:06.719 --> 0:35:09.759
<v Speaker 1>pitching a Netflix a Garfield series. And let's just say

0:35:09.800 --> 0:35:12.799
<v Speaker 1>they had a longer track record than my Adam and

0:35:12.800 --> 0:35:17.439
<v Speaker 1>I did on this. I have watched episode one. I've

0:35:17.560 --> 0:35:19.919
<v Speaker 1>enjoyed it. It is not the take I would have done.

0:35:20.680 --> 0:35:22.960
<v Speaker 1>And I'm not this is not to be critical. I

0:35:22.960 --> 0:35:26.000
<v Speaker 1>think they've made an interest, They've made some interesting decisions.

0:35:26.040 --> 0:35:29.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking forward to where they go. And that is

0:35:29.400 --> 0:35:32.319
<v Speaker 1>the beauty of this story. I'm I'm obsessed with the

0:35:32.360 --> 0:35:36.480
<v Speaker 1>period itself. Right this was we were so close to

0:35:37.040 --> 0:35:41.440
<v Speaker 1>getting reconstruction back. And I'm somebody who thinks a Garfield presidency,

0:35:42.160 --> 0:35:44.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, the Garfield presidency got a civil service reform,

0:35:44.640 --> 0:35:47.520
<v Speaker 1>which was not a small thing. Trump's actually trying to

0:35:47.200 --> 0:35:49.960
<v Speaker 1>the Trump now is trying to undo some of the

0:35:49.960 --> 0:35:54.279
<v Speaker 1>civil service reform that that Chester Arthur, who ends up

0:35:54.280 --> 0:35:57.759
<v Speaker 1>the you know, a forced vice president on by the

0:35:57.800 --> 0:36:02.520
<v Speaker 1>political machine in New York, ends up after the death

0:36:02.560 --> 0:36:06.959
<v Speaker 1>of Garfield, sort of sees the light and stops being

0:36:08.400 --> 0:36:12.840
<v Speaker 1>a cog in the Roscoe Conkling New York political machine

0:36:12.880 --> 0:36:17.840
<v Speaker 1>and actually pledges to fulfill a Garfield presidency. But I

0:36:17.880 --> 0:36:20.520
<v Speaker 1>think Garfield himself, had he lived, I think you might

0:36:20.520 --> 0:36:24.680
<v Speaker 1>have seen reconstruction come back. I think, you know, he

0:36:24.680 --> 0:36:28.320
<v Speaker 1>he was. He's the closest thing we've had to sort

0:36:28.360 --> 0:36:32.480
<v Speaker 1>of the out of nowhere president. Right. It's the you know,

0:36:32.520 --> 0:36:34.520
<v Speaker 1>I've always said the mythology. I was telling this to

0:36:34.560 --> 0:36:36.160
<v Speaker 1>my wife when we were watching, and I said, you know,

0:36:36.160 --> 0:36:39.680
<v Speaker 1>the mythology that you know, the out of nowhere candidate

0:36:39.680 --> 0:36:42.480
<v Speaker 1>can get the nomination with a speech. The reason the

0:36:42.520 --> 0:36:46.279
<v Speaker 1>mythology existed with conventions is because it happened once right,

0:36:46.400 --> 0:36:50.880
<v Speaker 1>James Garfield, right, his speech moved enough people to suddenly

0:36:50.960 --> 0:36:54.960
<v Speaker 1>start considering him because of this sort of deadlock when

0:36:55.000 --> 0:36:57.080
<v Speaker 1>it came to the Grant side and the machines and

0:36:57.120 --> 0:37:01.960
<v Speaker 1>all of this stuff. So, you know, Gettau and I

0:37:02.000 --> 0:37:04.880
<v Speaker 1>think there. I like how they're portraying Getteau because I

0:37:04.880 --> 0:37:08.080
<v Speaker 1>think he was mentally ill and sort of a guy

0:37:08.080 --> 0:37:13.360
<v Speaker 1>with delusions of grandeur who clearly had a troubled upbringing,

0:37:13.480 --> 0:37:16.080
<v Speaker 1>had a troubled relationship with his father. I mean, there's

0:37:16.120 --> 0:37:19.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot of you know, not to play spoiler here,

0:37:19.120 --> 0:37:21.720
<v Speaker 1>but you know, Gaeto ends up trying to defend defends himself.

0:37:21.760 --> 0:37:25.279
<v Speaker 1>When the first real sort of feeding frenzied trial of

0:37:25.320 --> 0:37:27.840
<v Speaker 1>the century that the media was obsessed with was actually

0:37:27.920 --> 0:37:31.480
<v Speaker 1>the trial and the Geteau trial, which began before Garfield died.

0:37:31.520 --> 0:37:37.200
<v Speaker 1>Because Garfield's you know, Getau Getteau, you could argue didn't

0:37:37.280 --> 0:37:41.960
<v Speaker 1>kill Garfield. The doctors who didn't know what they were

0:37:42.000 --> 0:37:45.520
<v Speaker 1>doing killed Garfield, right they stuck There. There's a guy

0:37:45.640 --> 0:37:49.200
<v Speaker 1>named doctor Doctor and I haven't I don't know if

0:37:49.200 --> 0:37:51.880
<v Speaker 1>they're going to portray him or not, but the guy's

0:37:51.960 --> 0:37:54.560
<v Speaker 1>name really was doctor Doctor. Like sometimes you just can't

0:37:54.560 --> 0:37:56.200
<v Speaker 1>make it up, right, it's going to sound like it's

0:37:56.200 --> 0:37:59.680
<v Speaker 1>been fictionalized. But he didn't believe that you had to

0:37:59.800 --> 0:38:02.520
<v Speaker 1>wash your hands before you I mean, this was still

0:38:02.560 --> 0:38:06.880
<v Speaker 1>like debated medical science. Do you do you do? You do? You?

0:38:07.120 --> 0:38:09.160
<v Speaker 1>Should you wash your hands? Do you need a sterile

0:38:09.239 --> 0:38:12.719
<v Speaker 1>environment before you? You know? Which I know seems but

0:38:12.800 --> 0:38:15.319
<v Speaker 1>it was a guy there was this was so called

0:38:15.400 --> 0:38:18.920
<v Speaker 1>new medicine, new medical practices that was coming out of Europe,

0:38:19.400 --> 0:38:22.600
<v Speaker 1>and it was a guy named doctor Lister, which if

0:38:22.640 --> 0:38:26.279
<v Speaker 1>you're wondering if doctor Lister invented listerine, he did not.

0:38:26.520 --> 0:38:29.480
<v Speaker 1>But doctor Lister was sort of the godfather of this

0:38:29.560 --> 0:38:31.440
<v Speaker 1>sort of idea that you wash your hands and you

0:38:31.440 --> 0:38:34.560
<v Speaker 1>need a sterile environment before as a doctor, before you

0:38:34.600 --> 0:38:38.600
<v Speaker 1>give medical care. So Lister Reene was though named after

0:38:38.920 --> 0:38:44.240
<v Speaker 1>you know Lister, is that part. But no, the treatment,

0:38:44.320 --> 0:38:48.000
<v Speaker 1>the attempt to save Garfield's life killed him. It's possible

0:38:48.040 --> 0:38:51.640
<v Speaker 1>if nobody touched them that he that he might have

0:38:51.880 --> 0:38:53.759
<v Speaker 1>that the bullet wouldn't have killed them, and he might

0:38:53.800 --> 0:38:57.360
<v Speaker 1>have lived and recovered with the bullet in him. But

0:38:57.400 --> 0:39:02.440
<v Speaker 1>the attempt to get the bullet out actually killed him.

0:39:02.800 --> 0:39:09.000
<v Speaker 1>So but that's obviously stuff that you've scientifically figure out later,

0:39:09.160 --> 0:39:12.520
<v Speaker 1>which in the moment we didn't have. But I am

0:39:12.680 --> 0:39:16.920
<v Speaker 1>obsessed with the entire period. Again, it's interesting how they

0:39:17.000 --> 0:39:19.879
<v Speaker 1>chose to sell it, which is, here's two guys you've

0:39:19.880 --> 0:39:22.280
<v Speaker 1>never heard of or you've forgotten, who have been forgotten

0:39:22.280 --> 0:39:24.600
<v Speaker 1>to history. One was the twentieth president of United States.

0:39:25.040 --> 0:39:30.120
<v Speaker 1>It was It's an interesting choice. I get it, they're

0:39:30.160 --> 0:39:37.400
<v Speaker 1>trying to mass appeal it, and I'm enjoying it. I

0:39:37.440 --> 0:39:40.759
<v Speaker 1>fully will confess I would have had a slightly different way.

0:39:40.800 --> 0:39:43.440
<v Speaker 1>I would have done it different way. I would have started.

0:39:45.080 --> 0:39:49.439
<v Speaker 1>Nothing wrong with what they did. And here's my goal.

0:39:49.520 --> 0:39:52.719
<v Speaker 1>I want this to be successful enough that there is

0:39:52.840 --> 0:39:57.160
<v Speaker 1>more appetite for more. I think Roscoe Conkling if you

0:39:57.239 --> 0:39:59.080
<v Speaker 1>want to go and read about one of the most

0:39:59.080 --> 0:40:01.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, the Mitch Mcca or Nancy Pelosi of their day,

0:40:01.680 --> 0:40:04.080
<v Speaker 1>and I say both right. He was a congressional leader.

0:40:04.320 --> 0:40:10.319
<v Speaker 1>Congressional leaders are both lionized and backroom transactionalists at the

0:40:10.320 --> 0:40:13.160
<v Speaker 1>same time. And don't let anybody tell you that you

0:40:13.239 --> 0:40:15.680
<v Speaker 1>got to have the mix of both of them. Conkling

0:40:15.800 --> 0:40:19.400
<v Speaker 1>was an interesting cat, and he's going to be portrayed

0:40:19.440 --> 0:40:22.879
<v Speaker 1>sort of, I think a bit simply here. It's less

0:40:22.920 --> 0:40:28.080
<v Speaker 1>simple than it is. But boy, is is he a

0:40:28.200 --> 0:40:33.200
<v Speaker 1>character that if there really was a demand for more

0:40:33.239 --> 0:40:36.080
<v Speaker 1>about this era, he could get his own mini series,

0:40:36.440 --> 0:40:40.359
<v Speaker 1>Like you could really develop something just on him. He's

0:40:40.440 --> 0:40:43.080
<v Speaker 1>that colorful of a character. And yes, the way they

0:40:43.080 --> 0:40:46.400
<v Speaker 1>have him dressing, he was always for the day, dressing

0:40:46.400 --> 0:40:50.080
<v Speaker 1>in brighter colors than everybody else. He was flamboyant man

0:40:50.160 --> 0:40:56.600
<v Speaker 1>about town. I don't think he ever spent a night alone,

0:40:57.000 --> 0:40:59.920
<v Speaker 1>so there's a it is you are right, max At,

0:41:00.000 --> 0:41:01.880
<v Speaker 1>It is up my alley. It was so up my alley.

0:41:01.920 --> 0:41:04.560
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to make my own version of it. So there,

0:41:05.160 --> 0:41:07.480
<v Speaker 1>all right, But kudos to those guys, and thank you

0:41:07.520 --> 0:41:12.640
<v Speaker 1>Netflix for green lighting a period piece like that. There's

0:41:13.200 --> 0:41:18.359
<v Speaker 1>great history to be told through incredible storytelling, and I'd

0:41:18.400 --> 0:41:22.439
<v Speaker 1>love to see more production companies support stuff like that.

0:41:23.560 --> 0:41:27.279
<v Speaker 1>Next question comes from Stafford from downtown la Hey. I've

0:41:27.280 --> 0:41:28.680
<v Speaker 1>been a fan since your days of Meet the Press,

0:41:28.680 --> 0:41:30.560
<v Speaker 1>and I'm loving the new podcast. Before my question, I

0:41:30.600 --> 0:41:32.839
<v Speaker 1>wanted to say that you appear to have done the impossible.

0:41:33.080 --> 0:41:35.760
<v Speaker 1>You've gotten me interested in both professional and college football.

0:41:35.880 --> 0:41:37.879
<v Speaker 1>Having grown up a Chargers fan, I had largely washed

0:41:37.920 --> 0:41:40.239
<v Speaker 1>my hands of the sport after nineteen ninety five. My

0:41:40.360 --> 0:41:42.320
<v Speaker 1>question is this, Can anything be done in the short

0:41:42.360 --> 0:41:45.360
<v Speaker 1>to medium term about electricity costs. I'm a school teacher

0:41:45.360 --> 0:41:47.480
<v Speaker 1>and my partner is a grad student at USC fight On.

0:41:47.960 --> 0:41:49.640
<v Speaker 1>We live in a one bedroom apartment in la and

0:41:49.640 --> 0:41:51.600
<v Speaker 1>while our incomes are enough to get by, it's starting

0:41:51.600 --> 0:41:53.480
<v Speaker 1>to pinch. I just opened our electric bill for a

0:41:53.520 --> 0:41:56.040
<v Speaker 1>single month and it's easily fifty percent more than we

0:41:56.040 --> 0:41:58.200
<v Speaker 1>were paying. A couple of years ago. I know data

0:41:58.239 --> 0:42:01.000
<v Speaker 1>centers are affecting energy prices, but more to it. Thanks

0:42:01.040 --> 0:42:03.520
<v Speaker 1>for all the wonderful analysis and for making your episodes lengthy.

0:42:03.560 --> 0:42:06.920
<v Speaker 1>I really get a lot of detail I can't get elsewhere. Sincerely,

0:42:07.000 --> 0:42:10.520
<v Speaker 1>Stafford from downtown LA. How about that somebody thanking me

0:42:10.560 --> 0:42:12.920
<v Speaker 1>for the length. I'm not gonna go Joe Rogan on you.

0:42:12.960 --> 0:42:16.040
<v Speaker 1>I promise no three hour podcasts. Right, Simmons pushes the

0:42:16.120 --> 0:42:18.960
<v Speaker 1>envelope in the two hour plus range. I'm going to

0:42:19.040 --> 0:42:20.640
<v Speaker 1>still try to keep a one in front of that

0:42:20.719 --> 0:42:27.759
<v Speaker 1>number on that front. So it's interesting with electricity, it's

0:42:27.800 --> 0:42:30.560
<v Speaker 1>such a complicated thing. I was digging into this, and

0:42:30.920 --> 0:42:33.279
<v Speaker 1>in fact, I'm going to be when you hear this.

0:42:33.320 --> 0:42:37.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to be down in Austin, Texas, interviewing the

0:42:37.880 --> 0:42:40.920
<v Speaker 1>governor of Maryland, Wes Moore, and I was talking with

0:42:40.960 --> 0:42:44.319
<v Speaker 1>his staff about a few issues, and we were talking

0:42:44.320 --> 0:42:46.720
<v Speaker 1>about electricity, and I said, you know, I was asking

0:42:46.719 --> 0:42:48.919
<v Speaker 1>about the data center issue in Maryland and Maryland, doesn't

0:42:49.160 --> 0:42:50.960
<v Speaker 1>you know Virginia is a data center state? And he

0:42:51.040 --> 0:42:54.520
<v Speaker 1>was noting, how you know? He says, Maryland's a transmission state.

0:42:54.560 --> 0:42:56.919
<v Speaker 1>You know, a lot of electricity goes through our state

0:42:56.960 --> 0:42:59.320
<v Speaker 1>and we pass it through. And you know, some states

0:42:59.320 --> 0:43:03.120
<v Speaker 1>are elect energy producing and they add to the grid,

0:43:03.200 --> 0:43:06.200
<v Speaker 1>Others only take from the grid, Others help, you know,

0:43:06.840 --> 0:43:11.480
<v Speaker 1>sort of. The grid itself is a complicated thing. California

0:43:11.520 --> 0:43:14.799
<v Speaker 1>has its own set of rules that only add to it,

0:43:14.880 --> 0:43:16.960
<v Speaker 1>and it's it's one of those things that I think

0:43:21.280 --> 0:43:25.600
<v Speaker 1>that you know, we're we're in this. You know, elect

0:43:25.680 --> 0:43:30.120
<v Speaker 1>elect electric companies are are private companies, but they're but

0:43:30.200 --> 0:43:34.160
<v Speaker 1>they have to get public approval for what they do

0:43:34.239 --> 0:43:39.680
<v Speaker 1>and how they do it. And I think that we're

0:43:39.719 --> 0:43:42.279
<v Speaker 1>about to see, especially with the data center, you know,

0:43:42.480 --> 0:43:44.520
<v Speaker 1>obsession and drain, and it's a real issue in the

0:43:44.560 --> 0:43:48.160
<v Speaker 1>state I live in Virginia because it is like Virginia

0:43:48.200 --> 0:43:49.960
<v Speaker 1>is a huge got a bunch of data centers, and

0:43:50.000 --> 0:43:53.120
<v Speaker 1>we have some of the highest spikes in electricity. So

0:43:54.640 --> 0:43:56.360
<v Speaker 1>I think there's going to have to be some federal

0:43:56.440 --> 0:43:59.640
<v Speaker 1>legislation here because I do think that, you know, every

0:43:59.680 --> 0:44:02.120
<v Speaker 1>state is set up to try to regulate itself. Right,

0:44:02.160 --> 0:44:05.319
<v Speaker 1>You're in a state where they're using a lot of

0:44:05.360 --> 0:44:08.080
<v Speaker 1>air conditioning and there's always a high a little more

0:44:08.160 --> 0:44:13.040
<v Speaker 1>usage of energy, particularly in the southern part where you know,

0:44:13.040 --> 0:44:18.200
<v Speaker 1>they're constantly having to regulate it, and it is done

0:44:18.200 --> 0:44:21.359
<v Speaker 1>on a state basis, based on state usage. But if

0:44:21.360 --> 0:44:23.840
<v Speaker 1>we're going to have more of these sort of drags

0:44:23.960 --> 0:44:27.520
<v Speaker 1>on the grid coming from other states, and all of

0:44:27.560 --> 0:44:31.120
<v Speaker 1>this is interconnected. So look, I think this is going

0:44:31.160 --> 0:44:34.919
<v Speaker 1>to be I think the electric bill issue is going

0:44:35.000 --> 0:44:39.239
<v Speaker 1>to be what the price of eggs were, right and

0:44:39.280 --> 0:44:42.239
<v Speaker 1>grocery bills were in twenty twenty four. You know that

0:44:42.400 --> 0:44:46.319
<v Speaker 1>this is going to be the thing that everybody comes

0:44:46.320 --> 0:44:48.080
<v Speaker 1>back to. We saw it in the New Jersey race

0:44:48.280 --> 0:44:50.960
<v Speaker 1>because this is happening across the board. Everybody's electric bills

0:44:50.960 --> 0:44:54.319
<v Speaker 1>are going up. There's just a more and they're you know,

0:44:54.400 --> 0:44:57.759
<v Speaker 1>and what people do is they cherry pick the thing

0:44:57.800 --> 0:44:59.880
<v Speaker 1>that they don't like to say this is the reason

0:45:00.080 --> 0:45:03.360
<v Speaker 1>it's going up. It's just everything is the reason. And

0:45:03.400 --> 0:45:05.799
<v Speaker 1>I think that there's some argument that what Trump has

0:45:05.880 --> 0:45:11.120
<v Speaker 1>done with canceling some of these all of the above

0:45:11.360 --> 0:45:16.799
<v Speaker 1>energy strategies, that he's actually limiting new energy getting onto

0:45:16.840 --> 0:45:21.720
<v Speaker 1>the grid, like we need more diversified sources of energy

0:45:21.800 --> 0:45:25.239
<v Speaker 1>in order to keep everything going that we're going and

0:45:25.320 --> 0:45:29.960
<v Speaker 1>him sort of you know, essentially torpedoing the Biden Energy

0:45:29.960 --> 0:45:33.239
<v Speaker 1>bill mandates when it came to wind and solar and

0:45:33.280 --> 0:45:37.760
<v Speaker 1>things like that, it's going to directly impact the cost

0:45:37.840 --> 0:45:43.480
<v Speaker 1>of electric bills. So I don't think there's anything short

0:45:43.560 --> 0:45:45.400
<v Speaker 1>term that's going to get done. But I will say this,

0:45:45.480 --> 0:45:47.759
<v Speaker 1>I think you're going to have more political rhetoric about it.

0:45:50.239 --> 0:45:53.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, we're all going to have to start to

0:45:53.160 --> 0:45:56.040
<v Speaker 1>recalibrate what's warm and cold in order to save a

0:45:56.080 --> 0:46:00.720
<v Speaker 1>few dollars. I can tell you what I'm looking into

0:46:00.760 --> 0:46:03.520
<v Speaker 1>is trying to figure out is there's some solar alternatives,

0:46:03.880 --> 0:46:08.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, to at least minimizing the cost on some things. Right,

0:46:09.400 --> 0:46:11.840
<v Speaker 1>is there and it may be tough in an apartment

0:46:12.000 --> 0:46:15.920
<v Speaker 1>situation to get the benefit of that. But will you

0:46:15.960 --> 0:46:19.000
<v Speaker 1>start to see landlords who maybe maybe you know, I

0:46:19.000 --> 0:46:21.000
<v Speaker 1>don't know how you're building a set up, and sometimes

0:46:21.080 --> 0:46:24.399
<v Speaker 1>you everybody sort of splits the utility costs. It's part

0:46:24.440 --> 0:46:27.920
<v Speaker 1>of a larger fee, and in that sense, the landlord

0:46:28.000 --> 0:46:30.720
<v Speaker 1>is incentivized to want to maybe put you know, solar

0:46:30.760 --> 0:46:33.040
<v Speaker 1>panels and come up with a different way. But I

0:46:33.520 --> 0:46:35.640
<v Speaker 1>think you're going to see a lot of people looking

0:46:35.680 --> 0:46:39.720
<v Speaker 1>for alternative ways to minimize their drag on the grid.

0:46:40.239 --> 0:46:42.799
<v Speaker 1>But they're still going to want need energy to power

0:46:42.840 --> 0:46:47.400
<v Speaker 1>their electronics or power their car power whatever. So but

0:46:47.520 --> 0:46:49.560
<v Speaker 1>I I you know, I'm not gonna I'm going to

0:46:49.680 --> 0:46:52.560
<v Speaker 1>keep researching this more and more to give you a

0:46:52.600 --> 0:46:56.040
<v Speaker 1>better answer to this question, Stafford. But I can tell

0:46:56.040 --> 0:46:59.200
<v Speaker 1>you I think this is this is an issue that

0:46:59.280 --> 0:47:03.800
<v Speaker 1>isn't is only going to get more in the mainstream

0:47:03.840 --> 0:47:06.560
<v Speaker 1>in the conversation because it's the type of issue that

0:47:06.600 --> 0:47:09.759
<v Speaker 1>everybody feels, right, everybody sees the cost of that, and

0:47:09.800 --> 0:47:14.480
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing these giant spikes throw in extreme weather where

0:47:14.680 --> 0:47:17.080
<v Speaker 1>in some places you're using your air conditioner longer than

0:47:17.120 --> 0:47:19.240
<v Speaker 1>you normally do, or in some places you're using heat

0:47:19.600 --> 0:47:22.160
<v Speaker 1>maybe at a time you never used it before. That

0:47:22.280 --> 0:47:27.799
<v Speaker 1>also does weird things to the grid and ups the

0:47:27.840 --> 0:47:32.239
<v Speaker 1>costs of what you're doing on it. So I think

0:47:32.280 --> 0:47:34.560
<v Speaker 1>there never definitely needs to be a little more federal

0:47:36.680 --> 0:47:41.719
<v Speaker 1>involvement with how this grid, with how the electric grid

0:47:41.960 --> 0:47:45.440
<v Speaker 1>is operating, because it's it definitely feels and you know

0:47:45.440 --> 0:47:49.160
<v Speaker 1>who knows Texas is not on the grid. They sort

0:47:49.160 --> 0:47:52.880
<v Speaker 1>of created their own system. That thing it, you know,

0:47:53.000 --> 0:47:59.440
<v Speaker 1>feels like it's it could trigger a bigger problem if

0:47:59.440 --> 0:48:02.040
<v Speaker 1>they have a tough winner it's always the winners that

0:48:02.520 --> 0:48:05.240
<v Speaker 1>really put a lot of stress on that Texas grid,

0:48:06.040 --> 0:48:09.080
<v Speaker 1>And if that collapses and it's come close a couple

0:48:09.120 --> 0:48:13.560
<v Speaker 1>of times, it could really sort of sober up everybody

0:48:13.560 --> 0:48:15.880
<v Speaker 1>and realize that we have a federal problem here. This

0:48:15.920 --> 0:48:18.520
<v Speaker 1>isn't going to be solved in one state. I don't

0:48:18.560 --> 0:48:22.080
<v Speaker 1>think states have this, have the ability to do this. No,

0:48:22.200 --> 0:48:26.520
<v Speaker 1>you may get some states try to find financial help

0:48:26.560 --> 0:48:31.279
<v Speaker 1>for people, but I'm not sure there's only only so

0:48:31.400 --> 0:48:34.759
<v Speaker 1>much money that might be available for that. But I

0:48:34.800 --> 0:48:41.359
<v Speaker 1>do think this is going to become the most symbolic

0:48:41.680 --> 0:48:43.680
<v Speaker 1>issue that's talked about when it comes to cost of

0:48:43.719 --> 0:48:48.480
<v Speaker 1>living challenges. Next question comes from Jim Philadelphia's This Big

0:48:48.520 --> 0:48:50.439
<v Speaker 1>Fans in c NBC Day's congrats on a great start

0:48:50.440 --> 0:48:52.200
<v Speaker 1>to the new chapter. One't been wondering, what do you

0:48:52.239 --> 0:48:55.399
<v Speaker 1>think Trump's real motivation is for intervening in Venezuela under

0:48:55.440 --> 0:48:57.880
<v Speaker 1>the Narco terrorism label. He's never shown much interest in

0:48:57.920 --> 0:49:00.600
<v Speaker 1>preserving democracy. Is this really about removing Is it just

0:49:00.640 --> 0:49:02.880
<v Speaker 1>another self serving move, maybe even a play for a

0:49:02.880 --> 0:49:06.440
<v Speaker 1>Nobel Peace Prize. Jim, I'll tell you what my thesis

0:49:06.520 --> 0:49:10.880
<v Speaker 1>is on this. So Marco Rubio, you know after starting

0:49:11.000 --> 0:49:16.000
<v Speaker 1>off his relationship with Trump making Dick jokes about him

0:49:16.080 --> 0:49:19.520
<v Speaker 1>right at a debate talking about his hands. Right, Why

0:49:19.600 --> 0:49:22.000
<v Speaker 1>is the hands part of the thing? Right? It is

0:49:22.080 --> 0:49:26.839
<v Speaker 1>Rubio that made that meme famous. Rubio has since done

0:49:26.840 --> 0:49:29.080
<v Speaker 1>a one ady Entrump right, we saw it sometime during

0:49:29.080 --> 0:49:35.680
<v Speaker 1>the first term, and he has gone out of his

0:49:35.760 --> 0:49:41.120
<v Speaker 1>way to endear him, endear the Latin American political activist

0:49:41.200 --> 0:49:44.920
<v Speaker 1>community that is on the side of ousting some of

0:49:44.920 --> 0:49:49.080
<v Speaker 1>these guys, but that diaspora that has a lot of

0:49:49.080 --> 0:49:53.120
<v Speaker 1>political and financial power in South Florida who've been very

0:49:53.160 --> 0:49:57.600
<v Speaker 1>supportive of Rubio's politics over the years. He essentially, because

0:49:57.640 --> 0:50:00.160
<v Speaker 1>Trump is such an important figure now in South Florida,

0:50:00.880 --> 0:50:05.000
<v Speaker 1>he essentially helped Trump cement whatever you know, cement this,

0:50:06.040 --> 0:50:07.880
<v Speaker 1>or you could argue Rubio had to catch up to

0:50:07.920 --> 0:50:09.719
<v Speaker 1>where all these folks, they all were going, they were

0:50:09.760 --> 0:50:14.920
<v Speaker 1>going to gravitate towards Trump anyway, but this began where Trump,

0:50:15.000 --> 0:50:18.480
<v Speaker 1>where Trump started. Basically doesn't make any decision in Latin

0:50:18.520 --> 0:50:21.480
<v Speaker 1>America without Marco Rubio. And that was true in sort

0:50:21.520 --> 0:50:24.799
<v Speaker 1>of the last year or two of the Trump era,

0:50:25.360 --> 0:50:29.040
<v Speaker 1>the first Trump term, and it is and then you know,

0:50:29.160 --> 0:50:34.880
<v Speaker 1>Rubio really ingratiated himself during Trump's exile at mar A Lago.

0:50:35.400 --> 0:50:40.680
<v Speaker 1>He'd constantly go there. He'd bring these Latin American figures

0:50:40.719 --> 0:50:45.160
<v Speaker 1>to meet with them. He'd be So this is a

0:50:45.200 --> 0:50:47.319
<v Speaker 1>long way of me making the case that this is

0:50:47.360 --> 0:50:51.280
<v Speaker 1>not a Donald Trump obsession. This is a Marco Rubio obsession.

0:50:52.880 --> 0:50:58.440
<v Speaker 1>And I think that Rubio has you know, there is

0:50:58.960 --> 0:51:02.359
<v Speaker 1>there is a demand and look, go see the I

0:51:02.400 --> 0:51:05.160
<v Speaker 1>hope you heard my conversation with Billy Corbin, and he

0:51:05.239 --> 0:51:09.160
<v Speaker 1>did a documentary called Men of War about a failed

0:51:09.760 --> 0:51:15.440
<v Speaker 1>sort of bizarre coup, you know, group of US mercenaries

0:51:15.480 --> 0:51:20.839
<v Speaker 1>working with a former bodyguard of Trump's to somehow get

0:51:20.880 --> 0:51:25.960
<v Speaker 1>on the get get into Venezuela and overthrow Maduro. Kind

0:51:25.960 --> 0:51:30.920
<v Speaker 1>of a bay of pigs, Venezuelan style type of story.

0:51:31.239 --> 0:51:33.880
<v Speaker 1>It's one of those you can't believe this is true,

0:51:33.880 --> 0:51:38.880
<v Speaker 1>but you know, Billy always has the receipts. There is

0:51:38.920 --> 0:51:40.920
<v Speaker 1>a group of folks in South Florida that that are,

0:51:41.040 --> 0:51:45.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, frustrated with Maduro, and this is Rubio cares

0:51:45.840 --> 0:51:49.160
<v Speaker 1>about this. Rubio believes in this, and I think Rubio

0:51:49.880 --> 0:51:55.399
<v Speaker 1>has got enough stature and status in Trump's world. He's

0:51:55.440 --> 0:51:59.120
<v Speaker 1>both Secretary of State and National Security Advisor that it

0:51:59.239 --> 0:52:03.520
<v Speaker 1>is Rubio that is helping to steer him in this direction.

0:52:04.000 --> 0:52:07.120
<v Speaker 1>And I think that there's no doubt in my mind

0:52:07.160 --> 0:52:10.759
<v Speaker 1>that this is a Rubo project that Trump has adopted

0:52:11.120 --> 0:52:16.319
<v Speaker 1>and he's you know, this narco terrorism thing is you know,

0:52:17.680 --> 0:52:18.960
<v Speaker 1>if you had to prove it, I don't know how

0:52:18.960 --> 0:52:22.520
<v Speaker 1>they would, right. You know, where do you prove that

0:52:23.000 --> 0:52:26.640
<v Speaker 1>the drug money is being used to fund terrorism? That's

0:52:26.719 --> 0:52:31.840
<v Speaker 1>number one? Number two what fentanyl? You know that this

0:52:31.960 --> 0:52:34.440
<v Speaker 1>is not where our fentanyl problem comes from. It's not

0:52:34.520 --> 0:52:37.759
<v Speaker 1>in Venezuela. It comes from Mexico and China. So this

0:52:38.000 --> 0:52:43.680
<v Speaker 1>is a pretext that's sort of been created. Look, I

0:52:44.440 --> 0:52:47.239
<v Speaker 1>would feel better about this if the argument were we're

0:52:47.239 --> 0:52:51.879
<v Speaker 1>trying to enforce democratic norms, then we can debate whether

0:52:51.920 --> 0:52:54.840
<v Speaker 1>we should be using the military to do that. That

0:52:54.920 --> 0:52:56.680
<v Speaker 1>should be the debate we should be having as a

0:52:56.719 --> 0:53:01.320
<v Speaker 1>country about this Venezuela move. But instead are essentially lying

0:53:01.360 --> 0:53:04.600
<v Speaker 1>to us about the rationale for what they're doing, saying

0:53:04.600 --> 0:53:07.279
<v Speaker 1>this is not about regime changes, it's not about the democracy.

0:53:07.320 --> 0:53:10.440
<v Speaker 1>This is about a specific thing. And yet what are

0:53:10.480 --> 0:53:12.360
<v Speaker 1>we doing? It looks like we're on the verge of

0:53:13.920 --> 0:53:18.040
<v Speaker 1>overthrowing a government. So it feels like we're you know,

0:53:18.120 --> 0:53:19.799
<v Speaker 1>it feels like we're doing this all the wrong way,

0:53:20.239 --> 0:53:21.719
<v Speaker 1>which is why a couple of weeks ago, in my

0:53:21.760 --> 0:53:25.600
<v Speaker 1>toodcast time machine, I wanted to make the Panama Canal

0:53:26.600 --> 0:53:31.480
<v Speaker 1>Anniversary the Liberation of Panama, if you will, an important

0:53:31.480 --> 0:53:35.359
<v Speaker 1>story because anytime, you know, whenever we're involved and we

0:53:35.440 --> 0:53:38.319
<v Speaker 1>lie about why we're involved, we do not help our

0:53:38.880 --> 0:53:41.840
<v Speaker 1>long term ability to have influenced the right way in

0:53:41.880 --> 0:53:46.960
<v Speaker 1>Latin America. And I just, you know, I am, I

0:53:47.080 --> 0:53:50.319
<v Speaker 1>want to see Maduro go. I am, you know, sort

0:53:50.320 --> 0:53:53.359
<v Speaker 1>of like it's like it's like Saddam. I'm glad Saddam left.

0:53:53.400 --> 0:53:55.680
<v Speaker 1>But was that the way to do it? I don't

0:53:55.719 --> 0:53:57.040
<v Speaker 1>know if this is the right way to get rid

0:53:57.080 --> 0:54:03.160
<v Speaker 1>of a DUREA. Next question comes from Dan, and then

0:54:03.160 --> 0:54:05.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to get into my college football preview for

0:54:06.000 --> 0:54:09.040
<v Speaker 1>the weekend. We'll do it through the prism of the

0:54:09.080 --> 0:54:11.920
<v Speaker 1>college football playoff. He goes, I've been enjoying the podcast

0:54:12.000 --> 0:54:14.400
<v Speaker 1>is always. Something I noticed is that the election coverage

0:54:14.400 --> 0:54:17.320
<v Speaker 1>shows that Andrew Cuomo outperforms on Mam Donnie among voters

0:54:17.360 --> 0:54:19.839
<v Speaker 1>without a college degree. NBC reports that Mom Donnie won

0:54:19.880 --> 0:54:22.480
<v Speaker 1>only twenty six percent of white non college graduates, and

0:54:22.560 --> 0:54:25.600
<v Speaker 1>similar trends appeared in the gubernatorial races. Despite overall wins,

0:54:25.640 --> 0:54:28.600
<v Speaker 1>Democrats still seem to underperform among non college educated voters,

0:54:28.880 --> 0:54:31.600
<v Speaker 1>raising concerns about their strengthen states like Michigan and Nebraska.

0:54:31.680 --> 0:54:34.120
<v Speaker 1>Is it fair to interpret these results as evidence that

0:54:34.200 --> 0:54:36.760
<v Speaker 1>Democrats have not yet repaired their image with working class

0:54:36.760 --> 0:54:39.160
<v Speaker 1>white voters. If so, what steps should the party take

0:54:39.160 --> 0:54:44.080
<v Speaker 1>to become more competitive with this group? Thanks? Dan, Well, look,

0:54:44.960 --> 0:54:47.399
<v Speaker 1>hopefully you're listening to the answer this question after you've

0:54:47.400 --> 0:54:49.759
<v Speaker 1>heard the interview with Adam Gentilsen. It's exactly what he's

0:54:49.800 --> 0:54:52.360
<v Speaker 1>trying to do, which is how do you get you know,

0:54:52.440 --> 0:54:58.719
<v Speaker 1>the irony is, you know, I think Democrats have struggled

0:54:58.719 --> 0:55:01.359
<v Speaker 1>culturally to connect to this group of voters for some time.

0:55:03.360 --> 0:55:05.600
<v Speaker 1>They used to be sort of Democrats and they were

0:55:05.600 --> 0:55:09.080
<v Speaker 1>just sort of Democrats, and it was they were culturally Democrats.

0:55:09.160 --> 0:55:12.600
<v Speaker 1>That that and the Democrats they thought economically were looking

0:55:12.640 --> 0:55:15.400
<v Speaker 1>out for him as it is. That explains why there

0:55:15.440 --> 0:55:18.560
<v Speaker 1>were two US senators in Nebraska for you know, not

0:55:18.640 --> 0:55:22.319
<v Speaker 1>an insignificant period of time, and almost always one a

0:55:22.400 --> 0:55:25.600
<v Speaker 1>state that you know, was the birthplace of the the

0:55:25.920 --> 0:55:28.880
<v Speaker 1>perhaps the original Prairie populace William Jennings Bryan, right, So

0:55:33.960 --> 0:55:36.200
<v Speaker 1>I think you're right to point out those things. I

0:55:36.239 --> 0:55:38.160
<v Speaker 1>think this is to me the great danger of the

0:55:38.200 --> 0:55:42.759
<v Speaker 1>midterms on the Democrats, which is they don't need they

0:55:42.800 --> 0:55:47.400
<v Speaker 1>could do as mediocre as they did with non college

0:55:47.480 --> 0:55:50.120
<v Speaker 1>educated whites in the midterms because they won't turn out

0:55:50.120 --> 0:55:51.520
<v Speaker 1>in the same numbers that they'll turn out in a

0:55:51.560 --> 0:55:57.120
<v Speaker 1>presidential election, giving Democrats an opportunity because they'll they'll sort

0:55:57.120 --> 0:56:01.120
<v Speaker 1>of over index on their more frequent voters and college

0:56:01.200 --> 0:56:03.719
<v Speaker 1>education voters, and they will be a bigger share of

0:56:03.760 --> 0:56:06.319
<v Speaker 1>the electorate in a midterm than they will be in

0:56:06.400 --> 0:56:09.560
<v Speaker 1>a general. It's why, you know, had they been a

0:56:09.640 --> 0:56:12.959
<v Speaker 1>presidential like turnout in say Virginia, maybe she only wins

0:56:13.000 --> 0:56:16.680
<v Speaker 1>by eight instead of fifteen, and maybe if you got

0:56:17.680 --> 0:56:19.920
<v Speaker 1>although you know, to me, the New Jersey thing is

0:56:19.920 --> 0:56:25.200
<v Speaker 1>why I why I believe this was a Trump referendum.

0:56:25.239 --> 0:56:28.520
<v Speaker 1>When you have the Republican candidate actually getting more raw

0:56:28.640 --> 0:56:30.920
<v Speaker 1>vote than he got four years earlier, but he lost

0:56:30.920 --> 0:56:34.880
<v Speaker 1>by ten percentage points more than when he lost before,

0:56:35.000 --> 0:56:37.080
<v Speaker 1>shows you a whole bunch of voters that didn't show

0:56:37.120 --> 0:56:40.560
<v Speaker 1>up four years ago that decided to show up. Well,

0:56:40.600 --> 0:56:43.200
<v Speaker 1>you didn't have an basically a whole bunch of presidential

0:56:43.200 --> 0:56:45.439
<v Speaker 1>only voters decided to show up in a governor's race

0:56:46.320 --> 0:56:49.239
<v Speaker 1>on the Democratic side. You didn't get the presidential only

0:56:49.320 --> 0:56:51.279
<v Speaker 1>voters to suddenly show up in a governor's race on

0:56:51.280 --> 0:56:54.040
<v Speaker 1>the Republican side. And then you can see how lopsided

0:56:54.080 --> 0:57:01.320
<v Speaker 1>things can get. I think the biggest, the potential worst

0:57:01.360 --> 0:57:06.680
<v Speaker 1>outcome for the Democrats hopes in twenty twenty eight. Weirdly

0:57:06.760 --> 0:57:09.640
<v Speaker 1>will be thinking that if they win the House in

0:57:09.680 --> 0:57:11.880
<v Speaker 1>the Senate, that they've solved their problems and it's just

0:57:11.920 --> 0:57:14.120
<v Speaker 1>a it's you know, they're going to just coast to

0:57:14.160 --> 0:57:17.040
<v Speaker 1>the presidency like what happened in six going into eight.

0:57:18.160 --> 0:57:20.439
<v Speaker 1>And I would just say it's very possible they could

0:57:20.480 --> 0:57:24.920
<v Speaker 1>have a midterm revival. Eighty six midterms were terrific midterms

0:57:24.960 --> 0:57:29.080
<v Speaker 1>for the Democrats, and then after getting clobbered in eighty four,

0:57:30.040 --> 0:57:31.840
<v Speaker 1>and then they go and get clobbered in eighty eight.

0:57:32.040 --> 0:57:38.080
<v Speaker 1>So I do think the Democratic makeup of their more

0:57:38.320 --> 0:57:42.240
<v Speaker 1>likely voter automatically puts them at advantage to overperform in

0:57:42.280 --> 0:57:44.640
<v Speaker 1>the midterms. It's why even in a bad midterm year

0:57:44.720 --> 0:57:48.480
<v Speaker 1>like twenty two was, they didn't get clobbered the way

0:57:48.520 --> 0:57:51.400
<v Speaker 1>they that an out party gets clobbered or an in

0:57:51.480 --> 0:57:54.200
<v Speaker 1>party gets clobbered simply because more of their voters are

0:57:54.240 --> 0:57:59.120
<v Speaker 1>just are more regular voters. No, I think that the

0:57:59.480 --> 0:58:02.600
<v Speaker 1>party still as a problem and until it you know,

0:58:03.160 --> 0:58:05.760
<v Speaker 1>in fairness to the party on this one, neither Virginia

0:58:05.880 --> 0:58:09.720
<v Speaker 1>nor New Jersey is a huge It had a rural

0:58:09.800 --> 0:58:16.320
<v Speaker 1>vote that the candidate had to make an effort. That's

0:58:16.360 --> 0:58:18.520
<v Speaker 1>not going to be the case in trying to win

0:58:18.560 --> 0:58:20.920
<v Speaker 1>an election in North Carolina. That's not going to be

0:58:20.960 --> 0:58:23.160
<v Speaker 1>the case. In trying to win in Ohio. That's not

0:58:23.200 --> 0:58:25.080
<v Speaker 1>going to be the case in trying to win in

0:58:25.240 --> 0:58:29.720
<v Speaker 1>Iowa or Alaska, or Kansas or Mississippi or even Texas.

0:58:30.080 --> 0:58:32.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, you can't win Texas just by winning the

0:58:32.080 --> 0:58:35.520
<v Speaker 1>cities that a Roar came close, but he couldn't do it.

0:58:35.560 --> 0:58:37.360
<v Speaker 1>He want all the he won all the cities, and

0:58:37.400 --> 0:58:40.320
<v Speaker 1>he won all the the big media markets, but he couldn't.

0:58:41.040 --> 0:58:43.440
<v Speaker 1>He got killed in the excerbs and the world voters. So,

0:58:44.320 --> 0:58:46.840
<v Speaker 1>uh yeah, I don't think they've solved any other problems

0:58:47.280 --> 0:58:50.360
<v Speaker 1>on that front, and I still think they the Democrats

0:58:50.360 --> 0:58:53.640
<v Speaker 1>are you know, they have to be seen as a

0:58:53.680 --> 0:58:58.640
<v Speaker 1>stronger party. Strength And I know that's an elusive word,

0:58:58.680 --> 0:59:02.880
<v Speaker 1>but I think strengths big a big thing with with

0:59:02.920 --> 0:59:05.120
<v Speaker 1>this voting group. If they're going to try to reconnect

0:59:05.160 --> 0:59:09.480
<v Speaker 1>back with them, and you know, the economy will be

0:59:09.520 --> 0:59:11.920
<v Speaker 1>an entree. It's not lost on me if you think

0:59:11.920 --> 0:59:15.200
<v Speaker 1>about it. The last four Democratic presidents in my lifetime

0:59:15.240 --> 0:59:20.800
<v Speaker 1>who've won all one during an economic downturn. You know,

0:59:20.800 --> 0:59:23.520
<v Speaker 1>it's possible that Democrats are just you know, in my

0:59:23.560 --> 0:59:26.680
<v Speaker 1>lifetime have culturally been on the wrong side of where

0:59:26.680 --> 0:59:29.040
<v Speaker 1>the country is, and Republicans of culturally have been on

0:59:29.040 --> 0:59:32.680
<v Speaker 1>the right side where the country is. But that Democrats

0:59:32.720 --> 0:59:37.400
<v Speaker 1>when the economies in the tank. It was true in

0:59:37.440 --> 0:59:41.240
<v Speaker 1>seventy six, It's true in ninety two, and although the

0:59:41.240 --> 0:59:44.120
<v Speaker 1>economy was recovering by the time Trump Clinton won, but

0:59:44.280 --> 0:59:46.160
<v Speaker 1>the perception was it was in the tank. It was

0:59:46.160 --> 0:59:50.080
<v Speaker 1>true in eight, it's true in twenty right, it was

0:59:50.520 --> 0:59:55.440
<v Speaker 1>certainly virus related, but still it was an economic downturn. Sadly,

0:59:55.480 --> 0:59:57.880
<v Speaker 1>it may be that there's an economic downturn in twenty

0:59:57.920 --> 1:00:01.160
<v Speaker 1>eight and and that powers every thing. And let me

1:00:01.240 --> 1:00:03.120
<v Speaker 1>just tell you this, when you have an election that's

1:00:03.120 --> 1:00:06.280
<v Speaker 1>all about the economy, it suddenly papers over all of

1:00:06.280 --> 1:00:10.920
<v Speaker 1>your different interest script problems, right because everything becomes about that.

1:00:18.880 --> 1:00:21.160
<v Speaker 1>So for Miami, it's their last home game. I know

1:00:21.200 --> 1:00:25.200
<v Speaker 1>you're on pins and needles. The College Football Playoff Committee

1:00:25.920 --> 1:00:29.800
<v Speaker 1>is getting a little better at giving some respect to

1:00:29.840 --> 1:00:34.040
<v Speaker 1>the University of Miami, though not a ton. The guy

1:00:34.080 --> 1:00:37.840
<v Speaker 1>who runs the committee, who was the spokesperson, basically said

1:00:37.880 --> 1:00:39.680
<v Speaker 1>Miami is the only team in the ACC that has

1:00:39.720 --> 1:00:44.800
<v Speaker 1>won a decent non conference game, like completely forgetting that

1:00:44.960 --> 1:00:49.000
<v Speaker 1>Ala Fingbama lost to Florida State in Week one. And

1:00:49.480 --> 1:00:51.520
<v Speaker 1>so what you see as you see. And this is

1:00:51.560 --> 1:00:55.680
<v Speaker 1>why I do not trust the ESPN Invitational Committee. I

1:00:55.720 --> 1:00:58.960
<v Speaker 1>think all of these athletic directors and they're all I mean,

1:00:59.040 --> 1:01:02.040
<v Speaker 1>my god, they've all realized they work for ESPN and

1:01:02.040 --> 1:01:06.920
<v Speaker 1>the SEC and nobody else. Apparently. It is it is

1:01:07.320 --> 1:01:10.080
<v Speaker 1>why we have to get rid of this committee. They

1:01:10.080 --> 1:01:13.520
<v Speaker 1>are not you know I And if you ask me,

1:01:13.560 --> 1:01:15.919
<v Speaker 1>you know, you could say I'm being you know, yeah,

1:01:15.960 --> 1:01:19.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm being biased towards the ACC. My bias is I

1:01:19.960 --> 1:01:23.200
<v Speaker 1>want the ACC to get treated fairly I'm just asking

1:01:23.240 --> 1:01:25.880
<v Speaker 1>for fair treatment. This is a committee, and this is

1:01:25.920 --> 1:01:28.439
<v Speaker 1>a network that has already punished the ACC two years

1:01:28.480 --> 1:01:32.800
<v Speaker 1>ago with denying an undefeated ACC champion access to the

1:01:32.800 --> 1:01:36.800
<v Speaker 1>playoff of Florida State. This is a ESPN Invitational committee

1:01:36.840 --> 1:01:38.920
<v Speaker 1>that denied the number one ranked offense in the country

1:01:39.000 --> 1:01:42.240
<v Speaker 1>with ten wins and two losses, the Oderrich of Miami.

1:01:42.440 --> 1:01:44.560
<v Speaker 1>They did not put him in the playoff simply because

1:01:44.560 --> 1:01:47.680
<v Speaker 1>they were in ACC school the exact same resume, but

1:01:47.720 --> 1:01:49.720
<v Speaker 1>an SEC school. And I promise you they would have

1:01:49.720 --> 1:01:53.320
<v Speaker 1>made it when you're literally the top ranked offense in

1:01:53.360 --> 1:01:57.680
<v Speaker 1>the country because supposedly those outside metrics matter. No, their

1:01:57.760 --> 1:02:02.480
<v Speaker 1>metrics matter only when it is about getting the matchups

1:02:02.480 --> 1:02:06.440
<v Speaker 1>that they want for the television show. And now it

1:02:06.480 --> 1:02:08.040
<v Speaker 1>is a head scratcher to me that they didn't think

1:02:08.080 --> 1:02:10.200
<v Speaker 1>cam Ward was good for their television show. I would

1:02:10.240 --> 1:02:12.080
<v Speaker 1>argue cam Ward would have been great for their television

1:02:12.080 --> 1:02:15.840
<v Speaker 1>show last year in the exhibition that is the ESPN Invitational.

1:02:16.320 --> 1:02:20.920
<v Speaker 1>But the fact that the committee is literally lying about

1:02:21.000 --> 1:02:26.240
<v Speaker 1>the ACC's resume on national television with Rhys Davis or misinformed, okay,

1:02:26.320 --> 1:02:29.200
<v Speaker 1>lying and inquires motive, But there is a motive here.

1:02:29.360 --> 1:02:31.160
<v Speaker 1>They're going out of their way to make the case

1:02:31.160 --> 1:02:34.920
<v Speaker 1>against the ACC because apparently, if you're if you're in

1:02:34.920 --> 1:02:38.120
<v Speaker 1>the ACC and you have a competitive conference, your conference

1:02:38.200 --> 1:02:40.160
<v Speaker 1>must suck. If you're in the SEC and have a

1:02:40.200 --> 1:02:43.200
<v Speaker 1>competitive conference, it's proof that your conference is great. I mean,

1:02:43.240 --> 1:02:48.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm just sorry, it's subjective bullshit on this, Okay. Yes,

1:02:48.480 --> 1:02:51.160
<v Speaker 1>is it true that the SEC program spend more money

1:02:51.360 --> 1:02:53.520
<v Speaker 1>collectively than the ACC does, so you assume you have

1:02:53.560 --> 1:02:56.840
<v Speaker 1>more talent. Yes, but you know he's produced like something

1:02:57.040 --> 1:02:58.360
<v Speaker 1>I like, if you want to sit here and play

1:02:58.360 --> 1:03:01.280
<v Speaker 1>that game. The ACC is I think produced the second

1:03:01.360 --> 1:03:03.400
<v Speaker 1>most amount of first round draft picks over the last

1:03:03.480 --> 1:03:06.640
<v Speaker 1>ten years, about right behind the SEC and ahead of

1:03:06.680 --> 1:03:10.560
<v Speaker 1>the Big ten in the Big twelve. But again, we

1:03:10.600 --> 1:03:12.840
<v Speaker 1>can you can find little things like that all the

1:03:12.880 --> 1:03:16.680
<v Speaker 1>time to slice and dice things. But they went out

1:03:16.720 --> 1:03:20.320
<v Speaker 1>of their way to punish to and it would have

1:03:20.320 --> 1:03:23.480
<v Speaker 1>been some other ACC school and they've done it. And

1:03:23.520 --> 1:03:27.160
<v Speaker 1>again this goes back to the where the hell is

1:03:27.200 --> 1:03:32.280
<v Speaker 1>the commissioner. Jim Phillips is way too meek in this conversation.

1:03:32.720 --> 1:03:35.680
<v Speaker 1>He lets Greg SANKEI go move around with them up

1:03:35.720 --> 1:03:38.520
<v Speaker 1>and down. I told you last week about my source

1:03:38.840 --> 1:03:42.919
<v Speaker 1>that told me how much that every week Greg Greg

1:03:42.960 --> 1:03:45.640
<v Speaker 1>SANKI must have had a hissy fit that that Herbstreet

1:03:45.680 --> 1:03:49.560
<v Speaker 1>and Fowler we're out doing a Texas Tech game. That

1:03:49.640 --> 1:03:52.640
<v Speaker 1>must have freaked them out. But that every week he

1:03:52.720 --> 1:03:55.120
<v Speaker 1>lobbies that you must be in the SEC. You must

1:03:55.120 --> 1:03:59.160
<v Speaker 1>be in the SEC. And again I get it, ESPN's

1:03:59.160 --> 1:04:01.440
<v Speaker 1>and business the SEC, but they're also in business with

1:04:01.480 --> 1:04:04.640
<v Speaker 1>the ACC. And I think the ACC could be suing

1:04:04.840 --> 1:04:08.040
<v Speaker 1>ESPN for breach of contract. This is a network that

1:04:08.080 --> 1:04:10.560
<v Speaker 1>has gone out of their way to diminish the value

1:04:10.560 --> 1:04:14.320
<v Speaker 1>of the ACC. The ACC has increased its value, and

1:04:14.560 --> 1:04:17.960
<v Speaker 1>ESPN tries to diminish the value of the ACC. And

1:04:18.000 --> 1:04:21.640
<v Speaker 1>they're your biggest business partner. The ACEC should be in court.

1:04:22.440 --> 1:04:27.200
<v Speaker 1>Don't sue each other, sue ESPN for for essentially for

1:04:28.880 --> 1:04:33.960
<v Speaker 1>diminishing the value of ACC sports in general and ACC

1:04:34.000 --> 1:04:38.440
<v Speaker 1>football in particular. I'm sorry the lack of pushback, and

1:04:38.680 --> 1:04:41.840
<v Speaker 1>again it's you know, ESPN controls the college football Playoff,

1:04:42.200 --> 1:04:44.120
<v Speaker 1>a mistake, which is why you got to get rid

1:04:44.160 --> 1:04:47.600
<v Speaker 1>of this committee. We ultimately got get rid of this committee.

1:04:47.880 --> 1:04:49.920
<v Speaker 1>There is a way to make all of this and

1:04:50.040 --> 1:04:53.320
<v Speaker 1>on the field issue, you can you know, if you

1:04:53.520 --> 1:04:56.680
<v Speaker 1>basically say, you know, if a conference, i'd love to

1:04:56.720 --> 1:05:01.160
<v Speaker 1>see sort of actually an eighteen playoff that essentially had

1:05:01.520 --> 1:05:05.360
<v Speaker 1>each conference have their own sort of sixteen round robin

1:05:05.400 --> 1:05:08.720
<v Speaker 1>of some sort that decided who their representative was in

1:05:08.760 --> 1:05:12.160
<v Speaker 1>the eight and you'd have your four conference champions, your

1:05:12.160 --> 1:05:14.520
<v Speaker 1>group of five champion after they had a little tournament.

1:05:14.720 --> 1:05:16.840
<v Speaker 1>But again, you had to win on the field to

1:05:16.920 --> 1:05:19.120
<v Speaker 1>get in, and then you might and you might have

1:05:19.200 --> 1:05:22.280
<v Speaker 1>three wildcards, which Notre Dame would be eligible for, and

1:05:23.080 --> 1:05:25.640
<v Speaker 1>the next two highest winning percentages in the power for

1:05:26.200 --> 1:05:29.440
<v Speaker 1>just like the NFL wildcard works. And yes, sometimes you

1:05:29.560 --> 1:05:32.720
<v Speaker 1>might have somebody left out, but it was done on

1:05:32.800 --> 1:05:36.160
<v Speaker 1>the field with metrics. Everybody understands at the beginning, you

1:05:36.200 --> 1:05:39.200
<v Speaker 1>know what nobody says from this committee. They can't tell

1:05:39.240 --> 1:05:41.280
<v Speaker 1>you to this day. What matters more. Your wins are

1:05:41.320 --> 1:05:45.120
<v Speaker 1>your losses. It's a win right. If they want to

1:05:45.120 --> 1:05:47.960
<v Speaker 1>make the case that Miami is in, they will make

1:05:48.000 --> 1:05:50.400
<v Speaker 1>a big deal out of their wins. If you want

1:05:50.400 --> 1:05:52.360
<v Speaker 1>to make the case that Miami is out, you will

1:05:52.360 --> 1:05:55.000
<v Speaker 1>make a big deal about their losses. Ditto with Notre Dame.

1:05:55.400 --> 1:05:59.320
<v Speaker 1>What's the case to put them in? They lost two

1:05:59.360 --> 1:06:01.840
<v Speaker 1>of their losses by a collective of four points against

1:06:01.840 --> 1:06:04.040
<v Speaker 1>two of the most talented teams in the country. What's

1:06:04.080 --> 1:06:06.440
<v Speaker 1>the case not to put Notre Dame in The two

1:06:06.520 --> 1:06:08.960
<v Speaker 1>times they faced talented teams in the country that belong

1:06:08.960 --> 1:06:12.400
<v Speaker 1>in the playoffs, they couldn't beat them. But Notre Dame

1:06:12.520 --> 1:06:15.240
<v Speaker 1>is a brand. Now, Look, Miami has been a brand.

1:06:15.240 --> 1:06:18.280
<v Speaker 1>Miami is the number one rated ACC school as far

1:06:18.320 --> 1:06:21.160
<v Speaker 1>as television audience is concerned. It has been the last

1:06:21.240 --> 1:06:24.440
<v Speaker 1>couple of years. You know, for the most part, Miami's

1:06:24.480 --> 1:06:28.040
<v Speaker 1>been a brand, and that usually helps them in situations

1:06:28.120 --> 1:06:31.320
<v Speaker 1>like this. I do believe when college football continues this

1:06:32.120 --> 1:06:35.320
<v Speaker 1>what they've done to the conference with the SEC and

1:06:35.320 --> 1:06:38.080
<v Speaker 1>the Big Ten have done everybody else, Miami will probably

1:06:38.120 --> 1:06:41.439
<v Speaker 1>be a half And unfortunately, my friends at NC State,

1:06:41.480 --> 1:06:43.720
<v Speaker 1>Miami's opponent this week may end up being a poor

1:06:43.760 --> 1:06:46.680
<v Speaker 1>have not. Now. I don't think that's healthy for college football.

1:06:46.920 --> 1:06:48.680
<v Speaker 1>I think we could be doing this a better way.

1:06:49.320 --> 1:06:53.480
<v Speaker 1>But anyway, here we are, so college football playoff rant over.

1:06:56.000 --> 1:06:59.160
<v Speaker 1>It does look like Miami's path is not crazy anymore.

1:06:59.240 --> 1:07:01.760
<v Speaker 1>They finally have them. They're still a bit under ranked.

1:07:02.040 --> 1:07:05.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, are you're really ranking Miami behind Utah no offense.

1:07:05.080 --> 1:07:07.960
<v Speaker 1>To my producer, Lauren is a big Utah guy, and

1:07:08.120 --> 1:07:09.960
<v Speaker 1>you know they do the you the wrong way. It's

1:07:09.960 --> 1:07:13.680
<v Speaker 1>not this way, guys, it's like this. But that's okay. Uh.

1:07:14.880 --> 1:07:16.600
<v Speaker 1>That said, do you think I have a lot of

1:07:16.600 --> 1:07:20.080
<v Speaker 1>confidence in a in this coaching staff to be ready

1:07:20.520 --> 1:07:24.120
<v Speaker 1>to put a licking on NC State on Senior Day

1:07:24.120 --> 1:07:28.800
<v Speaker 1>at Miami? You know, I got a sixty five percent

1:07:28.840 --> 1:07:33.040
<v Speaker 1>confidence level, but I don't have a ninety percent confidence level.

1:07:33.240 --> 1:07:36.120
<v Speaker 1>You know, Miami should be able to put a number

1:07:36.200 --> 1:07:39.320
<v Speaker 1>up on NC State. A forty five to ten victory

1:07:39.480 --> 1:07:42.360
<v Speaker 1>should be what they do if they want to make

1:07:42.400 --> 1:07:44.919
<v Speaker 1>the playoff. They kind of need a forty five to ten.

1:07:46.520 --> 1:07:48.040
<v Speaker 1>But if you told me this was a thirty one,

1:07:48.160 --> 1:07:51.720
<v Speaker 1>twenty four to twenty seven game that Miami eked out

1:07:51.960 --> 1:07:54.840
<v Speaker 1>or somehow screwed it up at the end due to

1:07:55.000 --> 1:07:59.120
<v Speaker 1>poor coaching decisions, I let's just say I fear it

1:07:59.200 --> 1:08:01.520
<v Speaker 1>a little bit now. I don't think NC State has

1:08:01.560 --> 1:08:06.320
<v Speaker 1>the defense and I think Miami's defense. You know, again,

1:08:07.600 --> 1:08:09.280
<v Speaker 1>we're I'm going to learn a lot about how much

1:08:09.360 --> 1:08:13.960
<v Speaker 1>these players want to play for these coaches, because if

1:08:13.960 --> 1:08:16.080
<v Speaker 1>they do. I did not like the first half of

1:08:16.120 --> 1:08:19.040
<v Speaker 1>what I saw in the Miami Syracuse game, it looked

1:08:19.080 --> 1:08:21.160
<v Speaker 1>like it didn't look like I mean, it does feel

1:08:21.200 --> 1:08:23.879
<v Speaker 1>like the offensive coordinator, Shannon Dawson is just out of ideas.

1:08:24.439 --> 1:08:27.800
<v Speaker 1>They continue. They are clearly not comfortable with Carson Beck

1:08:29.040 --> 1:08:33.680
<v Speaker 1>making some decisions because they seem to fear putting him

1:08:33.720 --> 1:08:38.479
<v Speaker 1>in positions to win it, you know, to either make

1:08:38.520 --> 1:08:40.400
<v Speaker 1>a big player potentially you know, put him in a

1:08:40.439 --> 1:08:46.320
<v Speaker 1>precarious position. It's a shame how they coach it, how

1:08:46.320 --> 1:08:51.240
<v Speaker 1>they do this. So we'll see. I'm I'm nervous. I'm

1:08:51.360 --> 1:08:52.960
<v Speaker 1>very nervous. I'm not gonna lie to you. I'm very

1:08:53.000 --> 1:08:58.559
<v Speaker 1>nervous about this game because I actually think coach Crystal

1:08:58.560 --> 1:09:02.200
<v Speaker 1>Ball is feeling the pressure. I think Shannon Dawson's feeling

1:09:02.240 --> 1:09:05.920
<v Speaker 1>the pressure. And sometimes pressure is good on people respond

1:09:06.000 --> 1:09:08.799
<v Speaker 1>to the pressure and they give you their best work.

1:09:09.160 --> 1:09:13.560
<v Speaker 1>And sometimes the pressure puts them and they get paralyzed.

1:09:14.000 --> 1:09:16.760
<v Speaker 1>We'll see. The biggest game on the board as far

1:09:16.760 --> 1:09:23.400
<v Speaker 1>as Miami's playoff rankings are concerned, is actually at the

1:09:23.479 --> 1:09:25.920
<v Speaker 1>sight of where game day decided to go, which is

1:09:25.960 --> 1:09:30.200
<v Speaker 1>an interesting decision. They're in Pittsburgh and they're for the

1:09:30.200 --> 1:09:33.519
<v Speaker 1>Notre Dame pit game. This is arguably Notre Dame's toughest

1:09:33.560 --> 1:09:37.000
<v Speaker 1>game left, which is really so they're there because you know,

1:09:37.080 --> 1:09:39.519
<v Speaker 1>Notre Dame has they can't lose in order to have

1:09:39.600 --> 1:09:41.040
<v Speaker 1>a shot at the playoff. They went out, They're going

1:09:41.080 --> 1:09:43.160
<v Speaker 1>to get in because a ten and two Notre Dame

1:09:43.200 --> 1:09:46.160
<v Speaker 1>team will always make the playoff, no matter who their

1:09:46.200 --> 1:09:48.080
<v Speaker 1>two losses are to, and no matter if the ten

1:09:48.160 --> 1:09:52.559
<v Speaker 1>wins are against the entire MAC Conference. It's Notre Dame.

1:09:52.920 --> 1:09:56.720
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's TV show people, So as long as

1:09:56.720 --> 1:10:01.080
<v Speaker 1>it's an invitational, they'll always get the invite. Pitt's been

1:10:01.120 --> 1:10:03.679
<v Speaker 1>an interesting team ever since they put in this freshman quarterback.

1:10:03.720 --> 1:10:06.880
<v Speaker 1>He's been on. He's lit it up. A patn our

1:10:06.960 --> 1:10:09.960
<v Speaker 1>doozy team usually isn't this free flowing on offense? Right.

1:10:11.880 --> 1:10:14.000
<v Speaker 1>Miami has to play Pitt last game of the year,

1:10:14.040 --> 1:10:20.599
<v Speaker 1>so this will be a common opponent. So everything about

1:10:20.640 --> 1:10:22.479
<v Speaker 1>this game I have to I'm going to be watching

1:10:22.520 --> 1:10:25.200
<v Speaker 1>every inch of it. It's on, it's the noon game,

1:10:25.240 --> 1:10:26.960
<v Speaker 1>it'll be on before the Miami game, which is a

1:10:27.000 --> 1:10:30.200
<v Speaker 1>three thirty. This is a huge game for the playoff.

1:10:30.200 --> 1:10:32.280
<v Speaker 1>It's a huge game for Notre Dame. It's a huge

1:10:32.280 --> 1:10:36.599
<v Speaker 1>game for the ACC, It's a huge game for Miami.

1:10:37.680 --> 1:10:41.400
<v Speaker 1>It is this is interesting, right, what's better for Miami

1:10:41.800 --> 1:10:44.960
<v Speaker 1>Notre Dame winning. I think I want Notre Dame to

1:10:45.000 --> 1:10:47.400
<v Speaker 1>win by a field goal and then Miami to beat

1:10:47.439 --> 1:10:52.360
<v Speaker 1>Pitt by thirty. That's probably the best outcome because this

1:10:52.439 --> 1:10:55.200
<v Speaker 1>will be if Miami and Notre Dame are both tenant

1:10:55.240 --> 1:10:59.800
<v Speaker 1>to the Pit. Game will be the most recent comparative

1:11:00.040 --> 1:11:05.720
<v Speaker 1>they'll both have played at Pitt. So I have a

1:11:05.760 --> 1:11:08.320
<v Speaker 1>feeling Pitt. And by the way, Pitt seven to two.

1:11:08.640 --> 1:11:11.840
<v Speaker 1>They're not out of this, all right, I'm not, you know.

1:11:11.960 --> 1:11:13.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if they can make it all the

1:11:13.680 --> 1:11:16.680
<v Speaker 1>way through their schedule and finish it off right. The

1:11:16.720 --> 1:11:19.720
<v Speaker 1>two of their two of their next three games are

1:11:19.800 --> 1:11:22.760
<v Speaker 1>Notre Dame and Miami, and the other one is Georgia Tech.

1:11:23.200 --> 1:11:26.599
<v Speaker 1>So Pitt literally might be facing three playoff teams at

1:11:26.600 --> 1:11:29.080
<v Speaker 1>the end of their season. But they certainly are going

1:11:29.120 --> 1:11:32.320
<v Speaker 1>to have an impact on Notre Dame's chances, Miami's chances,

1:11:32.400 --> 1:11:36.280
<v Speaker 1>and Georgia Tech's chances. And they's their last three games.

1:11:36.280 --> 1:11:39.120
<v Speaker 1>So look, Pitt's had kind of an easy schedule. We

1:11:39.160 --> 1:11:40.840
<v Speaker 1>still don't know how they lost to West Virginia, and

1:11:40.880 --> 1:11:42.320
<v Speaker 1>I think they're trying to figure out how they lost

1:11:42.320 --> 1:11:44.879
<v Speaker 1>to West Virginia. And then there are only other losses Louisville,

1:11:45.800 --> 1:11:48.800
<v Speaker 1>which is a loss that Miami also has, but they've

1:11:48.800 --> 1:11:53.759
<v Speaker 1>not They've not had the toughest of schedules. They opened

1:11:53.760 --> 1:11:57.040
<v Speaker 1>with Ducaine and Central Michigan and then West Virginia was

1:11:57.080 --> 1:11:59.400
<v Speaker 1>their third game of the year, which because it's a

1:11:59.560 --> 1:12:02.760
<v Speaker 1>it's a re rivalry. You throw the records out, right,

1:12:02.880 --> 1:12:09.080
<v Speaker 1>But it's a It's easily the single most important game

1:12:09.600 --> 1:12:12.639
<v Speaker 1>as far as the playoff is concerned. That's on the board.

1:12:12.640 --> 1:12:16.680
<v Speaker 1>A few other games. Uh, do you buy that Wisconsin

1:12:16.880 --> 1:12:18.800
<v Speaker 1>can play two good games in a row and give

1:12:18.800 --> 1:12:22.920
<v Speaker 1>Indiana and Indiana plays two bad games in a row?

1:12:22.360 --> 1:12:27.040
<v Speaker 1>Hard hard to see that one. This one's at Indiana. Boy, Yeah,

1:12:29.439 --> 1:12:33.160
<v Speaker 1>after this, Indiana only has Purdue, you know, the end

1:12:33.200 --> 1:12:36.120
<v Speaker 1>of the season, and that's that could be fun, right,

1:12:36.680 --> 1:12:39.639
<v Speaker 1>even though Purdue is winless, they're gonna they care about

1:12:39.640 --> 1:12:42.760
<v Speaker 1>this game. It's do you throw the records out? We

1:12:42.840 --> 1:12:46.160
<v Speaker 1>shall see South Carolina, Texas A and m I was

1:12:46.240 --> 1:12:47.920
<v Speaker 1>not going to pay attention to this game. And one

1:12:47.960 --> 1:12:50.880
<v Speaker 1>of my favorite betting podcasts made the point that South

1:12:50.880 --> 1:12:53.919
<v Speaker 1>Carolina is coming off of bye after firing their offensive coordinator,

1:12:53.960 --> 1:12:56.880
<v Speaker 1>a guy named Shula, one of the grandson of Don Shula,

1:12:57.400 --> 1:13:01.400
<v Speaker 1>and uh that they're going to make you know, and

1:13:01.439 --> 1:13:04.320
<v Speaker 1>they already know that. Miami and other schools are already

1:13:04.479 --> 1:13:07.960
<v Speaker 1>sniffing around Leonora's Sellers for the for their portal QB

1:13:08.080 --> 1:13:13.480
<v Speaker 1>for next season. I have a feeling that South Carolina's

1:13:13.640 --> 1:13:18.479
<v Speaker 1>offense is going to be a bit different showcasing Sellers,

1:13:18.600 --> 1:13:21.120
<v Speaker 1>let him do his thing a lot more. It's going

1:13:21.200 --> 1:13:24.120
<v Speaker 1>to be an open offense. So either it works and

1:13:24.160 --> 1:13:26.920
<v Speaker 1>we see an exciting game and Lenora's sellers is the

1:13:27.800 --> 1:13:30.280
<v Speaker 1>is the quarterback we all thought he was at the

1:13:30.320 --> 1:13:33.840
<v Speaker 1>beginning of this season, or an m just roles and

1:13:33.880 --> 1:13:37.599
<v Speaker 1>they win by three touchdowns. Anyway, it's certainly worth turning

1:13:37.640 --> 1:13:41.080
<v Speaker 1>on that game. U don't sleep on South Florida Navy South.

1:13:41.360 --> 1:13:43.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, this is just the type of game that

1:13:43.439 --> 1:13:45.840
<v Speaker 1>could turn into a weird shootout. The way Navy now

1:13:45.880 --> 1:13:49.120
<v Speaker 1>can score South Florida can score, it will this This

1:13:49.400 --> 1:13:52.720
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't be close, but it is at the Naval Academy.

1:13:52.760 --> 1:13:56.479
<v Speaker 1>It will be a little chilly in Annapolis. You know,

1:13:56.840 --> 1:13:59.320
<v Speaker 1>this is just the type of game that that USF

1:13:59.320 --> 1:14:03.600
<v Speaker 1>could blow. Do you believe in Oklahoma? I don't so

1:14:03.720 --> 1:14:07.160
<v Speaker 1>I think Alabama pays them. But it is worth noting

1:14:07.840 --> 1:14:13.160
<v Speaker 1>Alabama is not the best favorite all the time in

1:14:13.200 --> 1:14:16.519
<v Speaker 1>this Caleb de Borrera so far. But I just I just,

1:14:16.720 --> 1:14:20.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, I just don't buy that that Oklahoma can

1:14:20.479 --> 1:14:23.519
<v Speaker 1>score much on them. And do you how do you

1:14:23.560 --> 1:14:25.680
<v Speaker 1>think they have a good I know they statistically have

1:14:25.720 --> 1:14:27.599
<v Speaker 1>a good defense. Do you believe they have a good defense?

1:14:27.840 --> 1:14:31.160
<v Speaker 1>Have they really played anybody? Just something to think about.

1:14:31.200 --> 1:14:33.240
<v Speaker 1>I guess their Tennessee win that was that was a

1:14:33.240 --> 1:14:36.320
<v Speaker 1>pretty good performance. You got to give them that. But

1:14:36.400 --> 1:14:40.479
<v Speaker 1>obviously still has playoff implications right now Oklahoma has to win.

1:14:41.080 --> 1:14:44.160
<v Speaker 1>Uh and uh. I guess Alabama doesnt because it would

1:14:44.160 --> 1:14:46.880
<v Speaker 1>only be their second loss, and and you know they

1:14:47.600 --> 1:14:50.439
<v Speaker 1>and apparently their first loss doesn't even count anymore as

1:14:50.439 --> 1:14:54.680
<v Speaker 1>far as the College Football Committee is concerned. Other than that,

1:14:54.840 --> 1:14:59.679
<v Speaker 1>Iowa USC, you know, USC still has the outside chance.

1:15:00.000 --> 1:15:02.280
<v Speaker 1>I was lost, Iowa had it all it was there

1:15:02.320 --> 1:15:04.920
<v Speaker 1>for the taking. If they beat Oregon. This game is

1:15:04.960 --> 1:15:08.479
<v Speaker 1>a whole, but it's a big a lot different. It

1:15:08.520 --> 1:15:12.320
<v Speaker 1>suddenly becomes a playoff game. Now, does Iowa know it's over?

1:15:12.640 --> 1:15:16.000
<v Speaker 1>And if they do know it's over, USC could pace them.

1:15:16.680 --> 1:15:21.720
<v Speaker 1>The only other game that might be intriguing to keep

1:15:21.760 --> 1:15:23.479
<v Speaker 1>an eye on, of course, it is Georgia and Texas.

1:15:25.439 --> 1:15:28.920
<v Speaker 1>Texas can't lose. They have to keep winning. This game's

1:15:28.960 --> 1:15:32.920
<v Speaker 1>at Georgia. There's been a part of me that's wondered,

1:15:33.760 --> 1:15:36.160
<v Speaker 1>what does all the arch Manning commentary of the last

1:15:36.240 --> 1:15:39.120
<v Speaker 1>two months, what happens to all of it? If suddenly

1:15:40.360 --> 1:15:45.040
<v Speaker 1>Texas beats Georgia this week, beats Texas A and M

1:15:45.040 --> 1:15:47.120
<v Speaker 1>in the last game of the year, and is sitting

1:15:47.120 --> 1:15:50.599
<v Speaker 1>there at ten and two, and suddenly, with wins over

1:15:50.640 --> 1:15:55.000
<v Speaker 1>Georgia and Texas A and M, they're probably a top

1:15:55.040 --> 1:15:59.960
<v Speaker 1>ten team if that's what happens. Oh, by the way,

1:15:59.800 --> 1:16:03.160
<v Speaker 1>so that's anyway. Let's see what arch Manning looks like.

1:16:03.720 --> 1:16:06.240
<v Speaker 1>Let's see if the Georgia defense. You know, I think

1:16:06.240 --> 1:16:09.120
<v Speaker 1>Georgia can score on anybody. They've proven that that offense

1:16:09.120 --> 1:16:12.280
<v Speaker 1>has turned out to be pretty good this year. This

1:16:12.479 --> 1:16:17.320
<v Speaker 1>Texas defense show up and slow down Georgia. Obviously. The

1:16:17.360 --> 1:16:19.800
<v Speaker 1>good news is this is the primetime game and we'll

1:16:19.800 --> 1:16:21.960
<v Speaker 1>all have a lot of time to watch it. So

1:16:22.000 --> 1:16:26.120
<v Speaker 1>with that, let's go Canes and I'll see you next week.