Speaker 1: Stay right here for our final news round up and
Speaker 1: Information Overload Right News round up in Information Overload Hour.
Speaker 1: Here's our toll free telephone numbers eight hundred nine to
Speaker 1: foot one, Shawn, if you want to be a part
Speaker 1: of the program. When this is all said and done,
Speaker 1: hopefully sooner than later. May take a little bit longer,
Speaker 1: you know, because the Iranians have their own little power
Speaker 1: struggle going on. President has been very clear where he stands,
Speaker 1: as we went over in great detail in the last hour.
Speaker 1: But there's going to be, you know, a realignment when
Speaker 1: all is said and done. I think especially with NATO,
Speaker 1: and I think America's relationship with the Middle East also.
Speaker 1: You know, when you look at the President, I imagine
Speaker 1: that Cubas on the precipice of falling. Obviously, what happened
Speaker 1: with Manduro. Obviously, the influence of China and Russia in
Speaker 1: in our hemisphere, the Western hemisphere is now greatly diminished.
Speaker 1: Same with the Middle East. They have chosen to side
Speaker 1: with President Trump. So something dramatic is going to happen,
Speaker 1: and the President to get on the phone with President
Speaker 1: Chi of China and say you better not be arming
Speaker 1: the Iranians or replenishing their weaponry because that's not going
Speaker 1: to go over very well. And turning back as he
Speaker 1: did last week a Chinese tanker, and doing it with
Speaker 1: great confidence, and in the lead up and as we
Speaker 1: prepare for the president's coming trip pending trip to China.
Speaker 1: I'm expected to go on that trip. It's just interesting
Speaker 1: to see this realignment unfold before our eyes. Like I
Speaker 1: have been saying for a long time that Western Europe
Speaker 1: has disintegrated before our very eyes. Over the last number
Speaker 1: of decades. They have neglected national security, their own defense.
Speaker 1: They have been weak NATO allies and partners. They've been
Speaker 1: even unwilling to pay their fair share, we pay about
Speaker 1: two thirds of that budget. They've embraced radical leftism, socialism,
Speaker 1: climate alarmism, and even more disturbingly, they have allowed unfettered
Speaker 1: illegal immer without assimilation, and that has resulted in Sharia courts,
Speaker 1: nearly a hundred of them in Great Britain. That has
Speaker 1: resulted in no go zones in places like France and
Speaker 1: other parts of Western Europe. And I never thought we'd
Speaker 1: see that happen in our lifetime. People that come to
Speaker 1: these countries have no desire to assimilate. They they want
Speaker 1: to impose their way of life on the people of
Speaker 1: the country. You know that graciously opened the doors to them.
Speaker 1: And it's spectacular that the leadership, you know, Keir Starmer, Macrone,
Speaker 1: you know, Prime Minister of Spain and in even the
Speaker 1: Prime Minister of Italy have allowed all this to happen.
Speaker 1: And they're making these bold proclamations about we are going
Speaker 1: to figure what life is going to be like without
Speaker 1: the United States. They are decades behind catching up to
Speaker 1: us militarily. I don't I don't think Putin even views
Speaker 1: them as a threat anymore. You know, for example, when
Speaker 1: the President announced that Europe is offering to help secure
Speaker 1: the Strait of horn Moose, this is right after they
Speaker 1: had announced that the shipping lanes were open. Obviously a
Speaker 1: hiccup over the weekend, although the President is responding very
Speaker 1: forcefully to that. But it's funny to listen to Neville, Chamberlain,
Speaker 1: Starmer make this proclamation.
Speaker 2: We just had a very productive meeting bringing together forty
Speaker 2: nine countries around a very simple message and proposition that
Speaker 2: the world needs the Strait of Homus fully open, because
Speaker 2: that is how we keep prices down for our people
Speaker 2: and stop the global economic damage. So we've all agreed
Speaker 2: there was real unity in the meeting that we've just had.
Speaker 2: We want to see a return to talks and a
Speaker 2: lasting agreement, including the reopening of the strait.
Speaker 1: Yeah, a little too little, too late, and even this
Speaker 1: weekend after the Iranians broke the ceasefire. I mean, here's
Speaker 1: audio of a US Navy destroyer warning and then firing
Speaker 1: on this Iranian cargo ship in the Strait of Hormuz.
Speaker 3: Motas Mota Vestelska. Vacate your engineery, vacate your engine room.
Speaker 3: We're prepared to subject you to disabling fire.
Speaker 1: Well they didn't vacate their their engine room and the
Speaker 1: engine room got blown up. How does this ultimately reconfigure?
Speaker 1: What is this realignment going to look like? Gordon Chang
Speaker 1: is with us, author of the book Plan Read China's
Speaker 1: Project to Destroy America. Okay, So I was somewhat it
Speaker 1: was somewhat to my amazement that President Shei UH did
Speaker 1: in fact back down on the issue of arming the Iranians,
Speaker 1: at least as far as we know. If he's doing
Speaker 1: something covert, I don't have knowledge of that. If you do,
Speaker 1: please share it with us. UH. Similarly, you know, the
Speaker 1: idea that we turned back a Chinese tanker I think
Speaker 1: was a strong position of strength for America to take
Speaker 1: because they are far more reliant on Iranian energy oil
Speaker 1: sources than we are. We don't need a thing from
Speaker 1: the straight of hormones. And then we have the upcoming
Speaker 1: trip with the President and President she of China. I'm
Speaker 1: expected to fly with the President on that trip, and
Speaker 1: that should be probably my only chance in life to
Speaker 1: get to go to China. What are your thoughts.
Speaker 4: Well, certainly, President Trump is reordering the world. And one
Speaker 4: thing that we have learned throughout this year, from the
Speaker 4: January three raid on Venezuela to what is occurring today,
Speaker 4: and that is that there's only one superpower in the world.
Speaker 4: That's the United States. It certainly isn't China. In a
Speaker 4: number of Western analysts are saying China's playing is shrewd
Speaker 4: passive game. No they're not. They're passive. Yeah, they are passive,
Speaker 4: but the reason is that they cannot afford just and
Speaker 4: have no capability of standing up to a determined American
Speaker 4: president who is willing to use force to achieve American aims.
Speaker 4: We have seen China try to arm the Iranians certainly
Speaker 4: helped the Iranians with targeting information all the rest of it.
Speaker 4: But you know, you mentioned the United States and the
Speaker 4: blockade Sean yesterday. The United States, as you pointed out
Speaker 4: in that audio clip, stopped that Iranian ship. Well, that
Speaker 4: ship was plying between Iran and China, and many people
Speaker 4: thought that it was carrying Chinese weapons. We don't know,
Speaker 4: but the one thing we do know was that ship
Speaker 4: was sanctioned by the United States, and the United States
Speaker 4: stopped it and seized it. This shows the world that
Speaker 4: the United States is willing to enforce norms on the
Speaker 4: high seas nobody else is. There is only one superpower
Speaker 4: in the world.
Speaker 1: Why then, do you warn America so often about China
Speaker 1: and what is the state of their economy currently, and
Speaker 1: what do you expect to come out of these meetings
Speaker 1: with President Trump going to China.
Speaker 4: I warn the world because China is so weak that
Speaker 4: it could do something that can take us by surprise.
Speaker 4: Two things, Sean. One thing is that first of all,
Speaker 4: Sie Jimping, who's the most ambitious aggressor in history, I think,
Speaker 4: is starting to see a closing window of opportunity, which
Speaker 4: means he has incentives to act even when we think
Speaker 4: he doesn't. But even more important, and this is the
Speaker 4: second thing, the Chinese political system is in disarray. The
Speaker 4: purges are continuing. They're hard to stop, as we know
Speaker 4: from Stalinist Russia, and clearly right now the purges are
Speaker 4: accelerating in Beijing. That means Si Jimping may decide that
Speaker 4: it is in his interest to lash out. And it's
Speaker 4: not the rally the Chinese people, because the Chinese people
Speaker 4: don't want war, but it is to prevent other senior
Speaker 4: Communist Party figures from challenging him because he feels that.
Speaker 4: I think he sees that a conflict, a small one,
Speaker 4: would prevent other leaders from going after him. So that's
Speaker 4: why I worry about a week China.
Speaker 1: What is in his interest to meet with President Trump
Speaker 1: and have this summit? What is he looking to get
Speaker 1: out of this?
Speaker 4: He is looking a couple things. First of all, the propaganda.
Speaker 4: Anytime any foreign leader goes to China, it is always
Speaker 4: portrayed as a foreigner showing submission to the Chinese state,
Speaker 4: the Grand Celestial Court, and those images are I think
Speaker 4: the most important thing that China sees. Second of all,
Speaker 4: China needs access to the US market. It's never been
Speaker 4: more trade dependent in his history, and the United States
Speaker 4: accounts for something like thirty three thirty four percent of
Speaker 4: global consumers pending, so he needs to be able to
Speaker 4: sell to Americans. And then there are a number of
Speaker 4: other things that Si Jimping has on the back burner.
Speaker 4: There's like he wants the back President Trump, Wulf of Taiwan.
Speaker 4: He certainly wants access to US technology. There are a
Speaker 4: lot of things that are on the table, but the
Speaker 4: most important are the propaganda and the access to the
Speaker 4: US market.
Speaker 1: One of the dumbest things I could do, I know
Speaker 1: you'll confirm this is take my phone with me to China.
Speaker 1: The Chinese already have hacked my phone. The Russians have
Speaker 1: hacked my phone. The Iranians have hacked my phone. Why
Speaker 1: are they after my phone?
Speaker 4: They're after your phone because you're an opinion leader and
Speaker 4: you have great influence in the United States and they
Speaker 4: obviously want to know what you're thinking. So your phone
Speaker 4: is one of the most important ones for them to seize.
Speaker 1: Look, at the end of the day, I think there
Speaker 1: are territorial ambitions for as it relates to China, Taiwan,
Speaker 1: et cetera. I don't think President she would act while
Speaker 1: Donald Trump as president. Is that a miscalculation on my part?
Speaker 4: I agree with you. I think that they are worried
Speaker 4: about the use of American power, which they saw on
Speaker 4: January three with regard to Venezuela, and as they're seeing
Speaker 4: now with regard to Iran. They're also worried about something else,
Speaker 4: and that is President Trump's unpredictability. The Chinese can deal
Speaker 4: with hostile American presidents. They can deal with friendly American presidents.
Speaker 4: They can't deal with ones that they can't figure out.
Speaker 4: And I believe that they cannot figure out President Trump,
Speaker 4: so they'll give him a wide berth. But with the
Speaker 4: Chinese political system in distress, I just don't know how
Speaker 4: they are going to react. So I do worry about
Speaker 4: this time, and I do hope that President Trump will
Speaker 4: be able to lay down the law, which I'm sure
Speaker 4: that he is going to be able to do because
Speaker 4: he's already done it from the beginning of this year.
Speaker 1: How bad is their economy currently?
Speaker 4: They say it's grew five point zero percent year on
Speaker 4: year in the first quarter of this year.
Speaker 1: I read that. I didn't believe it.
Speaker 4: Yeah, it's hard to believe because even the official indicators,
Speaker 4: underlying indicators don't point to five point zero. Analysts were
Speaker 4: taken by surprise by how hyatt will, which is not
Speaker 4: a good sign. And we're seeing other indicators about the
Speaker 4: way the Chinese leaders are acting, and that's not consistent
Speaker 4: with a strong economy. So, for instance, they're going after
Speaker 4: foreign companies that are contemplating leaving China. That's not the
Speaker 4: sign of the economy growing at a robust five point zero.
Speaker 1: How important imperative is it for them to get the
Speaker 1: Straight of Hormones open because they get so much of
Speaker 1: their oil from Iran.
Speaker 4: Two things. First of all, it is the oil. They
Speaker 4: get about forty five to fifty percent of their imported
Speaker 4: seaporn oil through the Strait, and they do have an
Speaker 4: oil shock right now inside China. But there's something more important,
Speaker 4: and that is that China is trade dependent. It needs
Speaker 4: calm skies and seas so that people will be willing
Speaker 4: to trade. And with the problems in the Strait of
Speaker 4: Hormuz and possibly elsewhere, they are worried that they will
Speaker 4: not be able to trade and export their way out
Speaker 4: of their current economic problems. They're exports are unrealistic, but
Speaker 4: they become completely impossible in a world which is deglobalizing
Speaker 4: and which is turbulent around the planet.
Speaker 1: The thing is you mentioned earlier that the Chinese, just
Speaker 1: like the Russians, just like the rest of the world,
Speaker 1: you know, friend and foe, all like allies and enemies,
Speaker 1: geopolitical foes. There is this unpredictability of President Trump. Now
Speaker 1: I could tell you with one hundred percent certainty that
Speaker 1: is all by design. And I know that maybe in
Speaker 1: the minds of some Americans that really have no interest
Speaker 1: and have never had an interest, even though Donald Trump's
Speaker 1: spent on the world stage for eleven years, they have
Speaker 1: no interest in understanding that he knows exactly what he
Speaker 1: is doing. That unpredictability is factored into his thinking. He
Speaker 1: does not want anybody to ever be able to figure
Speaker 1: him out. He wants them, you know, on the edge.
Speaker 1: And he has a degree of believability when he says something.
Speaker 1: In other words, he's already done it. I think that
Speaker 1: is maybe one of the strongest weapons that he's never
Speaker 1: gotten credit for.
Speaker 4: I agree, and we're seeing this in a number of
Speaker 4: different arenas. You know, President Trump does think these things
Speaker 4: out you know that New York Times article about the
Speaker 4: days before the attack on Iran. It points out how
Speaker 4: thoughtful the president has been on these things, and that's
Speaker 4: something he doesn't get credit for among the general public,
Speaker 4: and certainly he doesn't credit get credit from the American
Speaker 4: elites who are always willing to think the worst of
Speaker 4: the president, who are always willing to run down our country.
Speaker 4: And so I agree with you. President Trump has got
Speaker 4: these guys on the back heels, and that's good. I mean,
Speaker 4: I do not want the Chinese to feel confident about
Speaker 4: their dealings with the United States.
Speaker 1: I don't either, and I think that unpredictability any Will
Speaker 1: I enjoy the trip there or no?
Speaker 4: First of all, if the war is continuing, the trip
Speaker 4: probably will be postponed again. I think you will enjoy
Speaker 4: the trip because Beijing is one of the more interesting
Speaker 4: cities in the world to see. It's one of my
Speaker 4: favorite places. And I am really jealous of you, Sean,
Speaker 4: because I can't go back, or at least I think
Speaker 4: it's not safe for me.
Speaker 1: No, I don't think it'd be a good idea for
Speaker 1: you to go back. You think I'll be followed the
Speaker 1: whole time?
Speaker 4: Yes, you will, be followed. You will be monitored. Your
Speaker 4: hotel room will be videotaped while you brush your teeth,
Speaker 4: so you should do.
Speaker 1: They're gonna videotape me taking a shower. Thanks a lot, Gordon,
Speaker 1: I really appreciate the details. Thanks for thanks. Now I
Speaker 1: have a high degree of comfort. Can't wait for that
Speaker 1: sucker to get released online. That's that should be every
Speaker 1: American's nightmare anyway, Gordon, Shang, we appreciate you eight hundred.
Speaker 1: All right, stop laughing in there, and I what's so
Speaker 1: funny about that? Oh nothing at all. I think you're
Speaker 1: gonna be taking a lot of showers in your swim trunks.
Speaker 1: I'll tell you that. I don't even have a Paris.
Speaker 1: Don't get a people, if I could, I would listen.
Speaker 1: I'm not sure if any of you heard. I mean,
Speaker 1: we've got a we've got a midterm coming and there's
Speaker 1: a Democratic Senate candidate in Michigan. His name is Abdul
Speaker 1: el Sayed, and he's insisting that Israel is just as
Speaker 1: evil as the terror organization Hamas. Hamas's charter calls for
Speaker 1: the destruction of Israel. Israel does not call for the
Speaker 1: destruction of Hamas. In Gaza, not at all. They're the
Speaker 1: ones responsible for October seventh, which would be the equivalent
Speaker 1: of forty thousand dead Americans a day. And I know
Speaker 1: there are some people. How dare bb net Yahu? How
Speaker 1: dare he he fight back and challenge Hamas that has
Speaker 1: done nothing for decades except build out a terror tunnel,
Speaker 1: networks and moneies that should be going to hospitals and
Speaker 1: schools and roads and infrastructure. They've stolen that money to
Speaker 1: build out their terror operation, to kill the juice and
Speaker 1: to wipe Israel off the map. The extinction of Israel
Speaker 1: is in their own charter. The people in Gaza voted
Speaker 1: in Hamas and it's in their own charter. And this idiot,
Speaker 1: this guy democrat running in Michigan for the US Senate,
Speaker 1: this is what he said.
Speaker 5: He said, Israeli government is evil there, just as evil
Speaker 5: as Hamas.
Speaker 6: Yes, killing tens of thousands of people makes you pretty
Speaker 6: damn evil. It's not how evil is this one versus
Speaker 6: that one? Hamas evil? Israeli government evil?
Speaker 1: We could say both. Is ntnya who?
Speaker 4: In your view?
Speaker 1: He's a warm crip? Absolutely?
Speaker 6: Do you not think he is? When you conduct a genocide, you're.
Speaker 4: A warm criminal.
Speaker 1: What do you make of the fact that Haley Stevens is.
Speaker 4: Backed by APAD.
Speaker 6: I find that disastrous for our politics. And you should
Speaker 6: be more interested in what's happening in Michigan than you
Speaker 6: are interested in what's happening in Tel Aviv.
Speaker 1: Let me tell you what the reality is. There is
Speaker 1: a very high Muslim population in dearborn, Michigan, and what
Speaker 1: Abdul el Sayeed is doing is he's playing to that
Speaker 1: base in the hopes of getting the Democratic nomination and
Speaker 1: further cementing the impression, which is real that the modern
Speaker 1: left wing, extreme, radicalized Democratic Party is now the party
Speaker 1: and the home of radical antisemitism. And why the likes
Speaker 1: of leaders in name only like Chucky Schumer who came
Speaker 1: Jeffries will not call out these radicals that now control
Speaker 1: their party. There's no excuse for it. And here's the
Speaker 1: worst part I would tell you, as odds of getting
Speaker 1: the nomination are probably pretty high in Michigan for the
Speaker 1: Democratic Party, but you see this rise and people you
Speaker 1: know talk about, well, Hanna, do you see it all
Speaker 1: over online media? This is the problem people believe online media,
Speaker 1: online media is it is a alice in Wonderland. It
Speaker 1: is not real. I mean, you've got to understand that
Speaker 1: there are millions, hundreds of millions, if not billions of
Speaker 1: dollars from outside entities that are targeting your children for
Speaker 1: their hearts and minds. I mean, we have our top
Speaker 1: geopolitical foes that are trying to foment thought, including virulent
Speaker 1: anti semitism, in your young kids, and you're not aware.
Speaker 1: Most parents are not aware of what their kids are
Speaker 1: doing when they are online. I did this whole series Radicalized.
Speaker 1: It's on FOG's Nation, and you need to watch it
Speaker 1: because your kids that you think it's innocent, they're on
Speaker 1: their phones, they're playing games. No, they're being radicalized. They're
Speaker 1: on social media. That's why you see these kids that
Speaker 1: get so reactive when they get bullied online. It is
Speaker 1: beyond influential and it is having a way bigger impact
Speaker 1: than people know. But I mean countries like Iran and
Speaker 1: China and Russia and other Gulf state nations that have
Speaker 1: not been in particularly aligned with Israel, they are purposely
Speaker 1: targeting your children to indoctrinate them into this anti Semitic thought. Well,
Speaker 1: Bebe's popularity among college students is down significantly because these
Speaker 1: kids read this and they think that this is real.
Speaker 1: It's not. These are outside influences, and just like you
Speaker 1: have crazy people in their underwear or naked in their parents' basement,
Speaker 1: these these very courageous keyboard warriors that are are trying to,
Speaker 1: you know, just put nothing but toxicity online. It's not real.
Speaker 1: I'm just telling you it's not. And whether you care
Speaker 1: to believe me or not is going to be up
Speaker 1: to you. All right, let's go to Georgie in South Carolina.
Speaker 1: George's heart is troubled this Monday. Let's see if we
Speaker 1: can't help him out. What's up, George? What troubles your heart?
Speaker 5: I'm Sean, I'm a big time fan of yours. I'm
Speaker 5: a big Trump supporter. But yes, me and my heart
Speaker 5: is troubled. What's going on in Lebanon right now. There's
Speaker 5: a lot of innocent people, civilians, Christians particular, that are
Speaker 5: being killed there. I mean, it just seems like Israel
Speaker 5: just going in there and carpet bombing the whole part
Speaker 5: southern part of the country. It'd be like, you know,
Speaker 5: in Long Island, hesblo terracel. Let's just bomb all Long
Speaker 5: Island I just don't think it.
Speaker 1: George, let me ask you a question. Did this happen
Speaker 1: in a vacuum or did Hazballah again another terrorist group
Speaker 1: committed to Israel's destruction? Have they not been firing indiscriminately
Speaker 1: into Israel for decades? I mean, are you saying that
Speaker 1: Israeli should not fight back?
Speaker 5: What I'm just saying is there's got to be a
Speaker 5: better way to do it. You can't have innocent children
Speaker 5: and people get killed that are Christian and in like
Speaker 5: what happened over the weekend with Israel their idea. You know,
Speaker 5: one of the soldiers taking a picture and it was
Speaker 5: confirmed to be real of Jesus Christ being flemmed with
Speaker 5: a sledgehammer.
Speaker 1: That was a one off. That's not how the people,
Speaker 1: having been to Israel many times, that's not how the
Speaker 1: people of Israel feel about Christianity as evidenced by the
Speaker 1: Old City. If you have not been to Israel, I
Speaker 1: strongly recommend maybe when it's more peaceful, you go over
Speaker 1: there and you can see the five sectors within the
Speaker 1: Old City of Jerusalem, including the Christian sector where many
Speaker 1: believe that Jesus was buried. But let me focus directly
Speaker 1: on these two apartment buildings, which is what you're you're
Speaker 1: referring to. Yes, there were you know, there there were civilion,
Speaker 1: civilian casualties, there was collateral damage. However, those and I've
Speaker 1: done a lot of work finding out the background of
Speaker 1: what happened here, and those two specific apartment buildings that
Speaker 1: were targeted were taken over by Hezballah terrorists that had
Speaker 1: been targeting and killing Israelis. Now you have this long
Speaker 1: standing problem and we saw this in Iran when when
Speaker 1: Donald Trump was talking about blowing up bridges and infrastructure,
Speaker 1: what did the Iranians do? They took Innis and citizens
Speaker 1: and they lined them up on the bridges, line them
Speaker 1: up outside of you know, power stations as human shields.
Speaker 1: They've done this in Gaza, They've done this in Lebanon.
Speaker 1: This is who they are. This is how they act.
Speaker 1: You know, out of Gaza, they fire missiles from schools
Speaker 1: and hospitals and other civilian areas, from people's homes. And
Speaker 1: they do it because if you look at, for example,
Speaker 1: the Iranians, they have targeted Tel Aviv, densely populated area.
Speaker 1: Well the Israelis, the Americans who have we been targeting
Speaker 1: in Iran. We have been targeting their military targets. We're
Speaker 1: not targeting the population densely populated areas inside of Iran.
Speaker 1: And that is the same mentality mindset that has existed
Speaker 1: in this NonStop, never ending proxy war by radical Jihatas
Speaker 1: that has been fought against Western civilization.
Speaker 5: Can I say something, Sean, I don't disagree with you
Speaker 5: what you're saying. War's ugly, it's a terrible thing. There
Speaker 5: are no winners, there's no losers, but you know.
Speaker 1: There are winners in losers. I disagree.
Speaker 5: You can win a war, yeah, but you take a
Speaker 5: lot of atrocity and things that you know, make the
Speaker 5: history books for future generations to read. But you know,
Speaker 5: at the end of the.
Speaker 1: Day, what's the alternative If somebody killed forty thousand Americans
Speaker 1: in a day, what would you want your government to do?
Speaker 1: Because that's what happened on October seventh.
Speaker 5: Yeah, I mean, I don't want to get into that.
Speaker 5: But the other thing is I.
Speaker 1: Really want you to get into that. Well, if they
Speaker 1: have a population of about nine million people in Israel,
Speaker 1: when you extrapolate out their population size versus ours, that
Speaker 1: would be forty thousand dead Americans in a day. What
Speaker 1: would you want us to do to a country that
Speaker 1: did that to us or a group of people that
Speaker 1: did that to us? What would you want America? How
Speaker 1: would you expect your government to respond?
Speaker 5: It's terrible. I probably want them to retaliate.
Speaker 1: Retaliate or obliterate. What's the difference? And there's a big difference.
Speaker 5: It's a tough I don't like you know, I'm a
Speaker 5: peaceful person. I don't like seeing anybody.
Speaker 1: I want to be peaceful too, But how do you
Speaker 1: make peace with people that think you're an infidel and
Speaker 1: that strapping bombs on their own kids is justifiable and
Speaker 1: the promise of seventy two virgins? How are you going
Speaker 1: to have a conversation with them?
Speaker 6: Right?
Speaker 5: It's I think President Trump said it at one time.
Speaker 5: He said, both of these sides they don't know what
Speaker 5: they're doing. They've been fighting for one hundreds to a
Speaker 5: year or you know, decades now, and none of them
Speaker 5: could get it right. You know, they don't want some
Speaker 5: of them want peace, some of them don't. There's just
Speaker 5: some underlying factors there that just don't know.
Speaker 1: Massa's charter calls for the destruction of Israel. Israel does
Speaker 1: not want to destroy the people in Gaza or the
Speaker 1: people in Lebanon, or be it war with Iran. I'm
Speaker 1: telling you they don't. They would much rather live in
Speaker 1: peace since.
Speaker 5: But here's my point. First it was Palestine, now it's Lebanon.
Speaker 5: There's talks of making a greater annexing the land that
Speaker 5: is surrounding and making a greater Israel. Do you think
Speaker 5: he's doing that or do you think he's just doing
Speaker 5: what you say he's doing, just retaliating, or you think
Speaker 5: he's looking on a land grab to make a greater Israel.
Speaker 1: Well, usually if in war, if you defeat the other side,
Speaker 1: you know, and you need a buffer zone or you
Speaker 1: win territory, then it's yours. Now that's historically speaking. However,
Speaker 1: do I think the Israelis would be content to have
Speaker 1: their current borders and live in peace? Do I think
Speaker 1: on the other side of this Iran conflict, the odds
Speaker 1: for a lasting peace in the Middle East they're going
Speaker 1: to be greater than they've ever ben and something that
Speaker 1: I definitely hope for. Let me ask you another question,
Speaker 1: Hiroshima Nagasaki, right decision, wrong decision.
Speaker 5: I wasn't around then, but I guess.
Speaker 1: Come on, now, you're copping out. Stop.
Speaker 5: I don't know. I mean, I wasn't around to judge
Speaker 5: the time, the temperature in the room or anything. But
Speaker 5: obviously it's in our middle our history books, and it's
Speaker 5: one of the days that you know, is on our
Speaker 5: calendar to mourn every year or so. I don't know,
Speaker 5: I mean, it's it's I mean right now, I mean,
Speaker 5: relationship seems to be good between Japan and United States.
Speaker 5: So at the end of the day, maybe it kind
Speaker 5: of woke up a lot of the world.
Speaker 1: It commonly cited range is anywhere between ninety thousand and
Speaker 1: one hundred and sixty six thousand deaths. A frequently referenced
Speaker 1: Japanese estimate is about one hundred and forty thousand deaths
Speaker 1: by the end of nineteen forty five. They attacked us
Speaker 1: at Pearl Harbor. Did we do the right thing defending ourselves?
Speaker 5: Yeah, I believe so, I mean, I'm not so.
Speaker 1: Tell me what the tell me what the difference is,
Speaker 1: you know, I.
Speaker 5: Just like I said, it's it's a very it's a
Speaker 5: part of the world that there just hasn't been peace
Speaker 5: and so long. I'm a peaceful guy. I just want
Speaker 5: to see these countries get along, and at the end
Speaker 5: of the day, that's that's what my phone call is.
Speaker 5: I hate seeing human life so so disregarded.
Speaker 1: You know I do too. But you know what, you
Speaker 1: wouldn't strap bombs on your own children and promise them
Speaker 1: seventy two virgins in heaven if they killed other innocent men,
Speaker 1: women and children. That's the problem. We're dealing with a
Speaker 1: death cult, and you have to face the reality that exists,
Speaker 1: not the one you wish existed. Joe and l J,
Speaker 1: you're next on the Sean Hannity Show.
Speaker 7: Hi, John, great show. You're the best in America, the
Speaker 7: best taxpayer champion. I think Trump is doing a great job.
Speaker 7: I think you'll finish up with a ran.
Speaker 6: We need to beat.
Speaker 7: Patient and I think once he does, the price of
Speaker 7: gasoline will go down and we will win the midterms
Speaker 7: in my opinion, with landslides. But you're doing just a
Speaker 7: fantastic job for the American taxpayers, and I just want
Speaker 7: to say thank you so much.
Speaker 1: Oh, you're very kind and you're very welcome. Joe and LJ.
Speaker 1: You're a good man. I will tell you that. Yeah,
Speaker 1: this may take a little bit longer than initially planned. Unfortunately,
Speaker 1: as Lindsey Graham very accurately depicted this, you have the
Speaker 1: guys in suits, they've woken up to the fact that
Speaker 1: they're going to lose, and then you got the guys
Speaker 1: with the guns, and the guys with the guns, you know,
Speaker 1: brought an end to the ceasefire. However, how this ends,
Speaker 1: we win and they lose. That's how it's going to end,
Speaker 1: and it will end sooner than later. It's just a
Speaker 1: matter of how much force the President ultimately will have
Speaker 1: to use. I like this last caller. I respect life.
Speaker 1: I would rather nobody be radical and extreme like this,
Speaker 1: but that's not the truth. That's not the world we
Speaker 1: live in. Unfortunately, I'm very pro life. I don't want
Speaker 1: people to die, but I don't like people killing other
Speaker 1: innocent people either, and that's what we're dealing with. Appreciate
Speaker 1: the call, Joe. That's going to wrap things up for today,
Speaker 1: Hannity Tonight, nine Eastern on the Fox News Channel News.
Speaker 1: I promise you won't get from the legacy media mob
Speaker 1: fake news, CNN, MSDNC, and this is important news. What's
Speaker 1: really going on with Iran. We'll get it all broken
Speaker 1: down with General Jack Keane Caroline Levitt, White House Press Secretary. Also,
Speaker 1: we'll check in with James Comer tonight. Nancy Grace, what
Speaker 1: about these eleven missing people that are involved in important
Speaker 1: science and intel in this country? What about them? Nine
Speaker 1: Eastern say you DVR Hannity on Fox, will see you tonight.
Speaker 1: Back here tomorrow. Thank you for making the show possible.