WEBVTT - The Ukraine War And Energy Crisis

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day we bring

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.560 --> 0:00:15.760
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets podcasted

0:00:15.760 --> 0:00:18.600
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and at

0:00:18.640 --> 0:00:24.320
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot com Slash podcast. Lots of moving pieces in Ukraine.

0:00:24.360 --> 0:00:28.000
<v Speaker 1>Let's get the latest. We're so fortunate of Agricuntrill on

0:00:28.360 --> 0:00:31.040
<v Speaker 1>the ground, I believe in Poland. She's a TV producer

0:00:31.080 --> 0:00:34.479
<v Speaker 1>for Bloomberg News. Tell us where you are, generally speaking,

0:00:34.840 --> 0:00:36.680
<v Speaker 1>what you can disclose and kind of what you're seeing

0:00:36.680 --> 0:00:40.600
<v Speaker 1>on the ground here. Hi, Yes, So I'm at the

0:00:40.800 --> 0:00:44.120
<v Speaker 1>station in Cemisal, which is a town in southeast Poland

0:00:44.200 --> 0:00:47.440
<v Speaker 1>that has received a huge amount of refugees in the

0:00:47.479 --> 0:00:50.440
<v Speaker 1>last several weeks. Um, I'm at the station here where

0:00:50.440 --> 0:00:54.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot of refugees they're getting trained directly from Ukraine here,

0:00:54.840 --> 0:00:57.800
<v Speaker 1>and also a lot of pedestrians that got went over.

0:00:57.880 --> 0:01:01.120
<v Speaker 1>They came over the border on foot are then taken

0:01:01.200 --> 0:01:05.119
<v Speaker 1>in busses from the border itself to this town. When

0:01:05.120 --> 0:01:08.480
<v Speaker 1>you talk about not only the humanitarian aspect of this,

0:01:08.800 --> 0:01:13.240
<v Speaker 1>but the economic aspect as well, Aggie, how we're both

0:01:13.240 --> 0:01:16.080
<v Speaker 1>sides of this feeling the economic sanctions that have been

0:01:16.120 --> 0:01:18.080
<v Speaker 1>put in place. Given as Paul said, I mean we're

0:01:18.240 --> 0:01:24.039
<v Speaker 1>now entering week four, Yes, so we're clearly seeing from

0:01:24.120 --> 0:01:29.640
<v Speaker 1>the European size that there is some sanction fatigue, potentially

0:01:29.720 --> 0:01:32.920
<v Speaker 1>from countries that are worried about the impact to their

0:01:32.959 --> 0:01:36.479
<v Speaker 1>own economies of the sanctions on Russia. The sanctions seem

0:01:36.560 --> 0:01:40.960
<v Speaker 1>to have significant effect on the Russian economy, but Biden,

0:01:41.040 --> 0:01:43.560
<v Speaker 1>who is coming to Europe in order to push for

0:01:43.600 --> 0:01:46.720
<v Speaker 1>a harder hitting sanctions against Russia, is going to have

0:01:46.840 --> 0:01:50.280
<v Speaker 1>to come up against a European Union that is quite

0:01:50.320 --> 0:01:52.760
<v Speaker 1>split on how much they can double down on the

0:01:52.800 --> 0:01:55.920
<v Speaker 1>sanctions in case it also hits parts of the European

0:01:55.920 --> 0:01:59.960
<v Speaker 1>economy significantly, especially when we're looking at places like Germany,

0:02:00.040 --> 0:02:04.040
<v Speaker 1>which is still so heavily dependent on Russian gas. Aggie.

0:02:04.120 --> 0:02:07.240
<v Speaker 1>You're literally on the ground there, um as you see

0:02:07.240 --> 0:02:10.840
<v Speaker 1>the refugees come in. How is Europe planning on dealing

0:02:10.919 --> 0:02:13.800
<v Speaker 1>with what I've seen three to four million refugees and

0:02:14.000 --> 0:02:16.080
<v Speaker 1>I guess that number is going to continue to grow.

0:02:17.000 --> 0:02:20.040
<v Speaker 1>Is there a plan who's leading kind of the the

0:02:20.360 --> 0:02:23.440
<v Speaker 1>way to house these refugees for what might be a

0:02:23.440 --> 0:02:28.480
<v Speaker 1>fairly long stay. I think you're pointing at a key thing.

0:02:28.560 --> 0:02:31.639
<v Speaker 1>There is the question of how long this day will be.

0:02:31.639 --> 0:02:35.120
<v Speaker 1>Because in the short term the work has been quite

0:02:35.120 --> 0:02:39.280
<v Speaker 1>efficient to manage to get people into places away from

0:02:39.320 --> 0:02:41.760
<v Speaker 1>the border. For the most part, people are able to

0:02:41.800 --> 0:02:45.919
<v Speaker 1>find accommodation, sort of ad hoc accommodation in other places,

0:02:45.960 --> 0:02:48.640
<v Speaker 1>but that's putting a lot of pressure on cities. A

0:02:48.760 --> 0:02:51.680
<v Speaker 1>huge amount of the refugees who arrived in Poland, for instance,

0:02:52.040 --> 0:02:54.680
<v Speaker 1>are staying in Poland. The U N a c I.

0:02:54.680 --> 0:02:57.480
<v Speaker 1>Sas is around all the refugees that came in to

0:02:57.600 --> 0:03:00.239
<v Speaker 1>Poland are probably going to stay there, and that means

0:03:00.240 --> 0:03:02.520
<v Speaker 1>that there's going to be a lot of pressure on Poland,

0:03:02.520 --> 0:03:05.799
<v Speaker 1>a country that's already reeling from the coronavirus like many countries,

0:03:06.320 --> 0:03:09.519
<v Speaker 1>and trying to find the funding in order to secure

0:03:09.840 --> 0:03:12.880
<v Speaker 1>housing and access to the labor market. And also because

0:03:12.960 --> 0:03:17.119
<v Speaker 1>so many of these refugees are minors, many are unaccompanied miners,

0:03:17.200 --> 0:03:19.079
<v Speaker 1>it's also a question of how to get them into

0:03:19.080 --> 0:03:21.880
<v Speaker 1>the education system. And so in the short term it

0:03:21.960 --> 0:03:24.360
<v Speaker 1>seems to have worked but it is a question is

0:03:24.400 --> 0:03:27.160
<v Speaker 1>that what this means in the long term and how

0:03:27.200 --> 0:03:30.520
<v Speaker 1>that's going to look going forward. And you think about Ague,

0:03:30.560 --> 0:03:33.320
<v Speaker 1>this is a not only a story about Poland, but

0:03:33.440 --> 0:03:36.200
<v Speaker 1>the rest of Eastern Europe that responds any sort of

0:03:36.200 --> 0:03:38.840
<v Speaker 1>additional help they can get from more of the Western

0:03:39.000 --> 0:03:43.520
<v Speaker 1>European countries, how is the rest of Eastern Europe responding

0:03:44.160 --> 0:03:49.120
<v Speaker 1>acting and the likes a huge amount of Eastern Europe

0:03:49.240 --> 0:03:52.680
<v Speaker 1>it feels the pressure that Russia is putting on Ukraine

0:03:52.800 --> 0:03:56.480
<v Speaker 1>also themselves, and so first and foremost there has been

0:03:56.520 --> 0:04:00.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot of solidarity on the ground to help the refugee,

0:04:00.480 --> 0:04:04.640
<v Speaker 1>but they are expecting more support, especially fiscal support from

0:04:04.680 --> 0:04:07.040
<v Speaker 1>the European Union, and that is something that a lot

0:04:07.080 --> 0:04:10.760
<v Speaker 1>of these countries have been pushing for. And so going forward,

0:04:10.800 --> 0:04:13.840
<v Speaker 1>this is going to be a concern as to how

0:04:14.040 --> 0:04:19.560
<v Speaker 1>the resource allocation works um for for instance, unlocking the

0:04:20.360 --> 0:04:24.120
<v Speaker 1>Coronavirus Recovery Fund in order to support these countries that

0:04:24.160 --> 0:04:28.600
<v Speaker 1>are dealing with these influxes of refugees. So, from your

0:04:28.600 --> 0:04:30.640
<v Speaker 1>position on the on the ground there in Poland, is

0:04:30.680 --> 0:04:34.359
<v Speaker 1>there a consensus as to how this might play out? Aggie?

0:04:36.120 --> 0:04:38.520
<v Speaker 1>It's quite difficult to say, But the thing I hear,

0:04:38.720 --> 0:04:41.440
<v Speaker 1>especially from a lot of the people coming over the border,

0:04:41.640 --> 0:04:44.000
<v Speaker 1>is that they are really hopeful for this to be

0:04:44.080 --> 0:04:47.799
<v Speaker 1>a temporary issue. Pretty Much everyone I speak to here

0:04:48.120 --> 0:04:51.239
<v Speaker 1>has an intention to return to Ukraine at some point,

0:04:51.480 --> 0:04:54.520
<v Speaker 1>and they do not want to settle completely in another country.

0:04:54.560 --> 0:04:56.960
<v Speaker 1>They want to be able to return to their families. Also,

0:04:57.040 --> 0:04:59.440
<v Speaker 1>because it is notable that so many of the people

0:04:59.440 --> 0:05:03.120
<v Speaker 1>who left women and children, and they've often been split

0:05:03.200 --> 0:05:05.080
<v Speaker 1>up from the men in their family who have remained

0:05:05.080 --> 0:05:07.840
<v Speaker 1>in Ukraine. So there is a concern for a lot

0:05:07.880 --> 0:05:09.960
<v Speaker 1>of them that they hope that this is short lived.

0:05:10.200 --> 0:05:12.400
<v Speaker 1>But as the war goes into its second month, there

0:05:12.440 --> 0:05:14.919
<v Speaker 1>are a lot of people now looking at what those

0:05:15.000 --> 0:05:20.040
<v Speaker 1>next steps will all. Right, control, We appreciate getting your

0:05:20.080 --> 0:05:23.040
<v Speaker 1>thoughts in perspective. A contral she's a TV producer for

0:05:23.080 --> 0:05:26.240
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg News. She has been she's based in Berlin, She's

0:05:26.279 --> 0:05:31.160
<v Speaker 1>but she's been on that southeastern border of Poland and Ukraine,

0:05:31.279 --> 0:05:35.320
<v Speaker 1>and she's getting us first hand reporting about the refugee

0:05:35.640 --> 0:05:38.280
<v Speaker 1>situation and um as a continuous day by day and

0:05:38.520 --> 0:05:41.360
<v Speaker 1>as she mentioned, going into the second month here, and

0:05:41.400 --> 0:05:45.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure anybody on either side thought that it

0:05:45.040 --> 0:05:47.680
<v Speaker 1>would continue on here into its second month, but we

0:05:47.720 --> 0:05:50.599
<v Speaker 1>will certainly continue our reporting, and we really thank Aggie

0:05:50.640 --> 0:05:53.200
<v Speaker 1>for taking time out to share some of her first

0:05:53.440 --> 0:05:56.520
<v Speaker 1>hand views of what's happening on the ground in that

0:05:56.600 --> 0:06:04.839
<v Speaker 1>border of Poland and Ukraine. We've got a federal Reserve

0:06:04.880 --> 0:06:08.720
<v Speaker 1>which has pivoted noticeably to a more hawkish view. We're

0:06:08.720 --> 0:06:13.160
<v Speaker 1>talking about potentially seven eight rate hikes over the next year, uh,

0:06:13.320 --> 0:06:16.400
<v Speaker 1>perhaps fifty basis point rate hikes. What are assets to

0:06:16.440 --> 0:06:18.039
<v Speaker 1>do here? What are risk assets to do in that

0:06:18.080 --> 0:06:20.200
<v Speaker 1>type of environment? Let's check them with Randy Swimmer, co

0:06:20.360 --> 0:06:22.839
<v Speaker 1>head of Senior Lending and a senior managing director Churchill

0:06:23.120 --> 0:06:26.919
<v Speaker 1>Asset Management. Randy, it's been a while since these financial

0:06:26.960 --> 0:06:31.360
<v Speaker 1>markets have had to deal with a significantly um an

0:06:31.440 --> 0:06:35.080
<v Speaker 1>environment that has significant rate increases in the offing. How

0:06:35.120 --> 0:06:38.400
<v Speaker 1>do you think about that? Yeah, And in fact, it's

0:06:38.440 --> 0:06:41.240
<v Speaker 1>the kind of thing that expectations for the kind of

0:06:41.279 --> 0:06:44.880
<v Speaker 1>moves that have happened and that actually embarked on last

0:06:44.960 --> 0:06:49.159
<v Speaker 1>week have been growing. And now that in fact that

0:06:50.240 --> 0:06:53.880
<v Speaker 1>has been behind us. And in fact, if anything, UH

0:06:54.000 --> 0:06:57.160
<v Speaker 1>FED j R. Powell has uh doubled down a little

0:06:57.160 --> 0:07:00.720
<v Speaker 1>bit and said, hey, don't worry if things, if inflation

0:07:00.800 --> 0:07:03.920
<v Speaker 1>doesn't get tamed, we're prepared to go even at fifty

0:07:03.960 --> 0:07:09.440
<v Speaker 1>basis points. Uh per hike I think has given investors

0:07:09.600 --> 0:07:14.480
<v Speaker 1>some kind of path to uh you know, less volatility

0:07:14.520 --> 0:07:17.440
<v Speaker 1>in the sense that they know where this is headed. Now,

0:07:17.440 --> 0:07:21.800
<v Speaker 1>what's into into the conversation has been ge do these

0:07:21.920 --> 0:07:26.000
<v Speaker 1>federate hike because they potentially lead to a slowdown, and

0:07:26.000 --> 0:07:29.400
<v Speaker 1>we're starting to see more observers coming out and starting

0:07:29.440 --> 0:07:32.440
<v Speaker 1>to worry about that. UM Now, I still think that

0:07:32.560 --> 0:07:35.840
<v Speaker 1>the signs, the economic signs that are around us, you know,

0:07:35.880 --> 0:07:41.720
<v Speaker 1>with housing starts and commercial and manufacturing production still being

0:07:41.760 --> 0:07:46.480
<v Speaker 1>up solidly, expectations for this year for GDP still you know,

0:07:46.520 --> 0:07:50.440
<v Speaker 1>in that kind of high to the low threes range

0:07:50.640 --> 0:07:53.440
<v Speaker 1>in a positive way, still is sending I think a

0:07:53.600 --> 0:07:57.960
<v Speaker 1>very good growth message overall to UH two investors. So

0:07:58.000 --> 0:07:59.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't think there's a chance of a recession and

0:08:00.120 --> 0:08:04.640
<v Speaker 1>time soon, but it is at least giving certainly credit

0:08:04.760 --> 0:08:07.520
<v Speaker 1>investors something to look at. But I do think that

0:08:07.680 --> 0:08:11.280
<v Speaker 1>overall people are feeling now that if that's on a

0:08:11.360 --> 0:08:16.640
<v Speaker 1>path removed some uncertainty regarding the direction certainly great and

0:08:16.800 --> 0:08:18.600
<v Speaker 1>how many are going to be happening over the next

0:08:18.640 --> 0:08:22.160
<v Speaker 1>year too, and then we'll see how this unfolds, you know, Randy,

0:08:22.200 --> 0:08:26.840
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting I've heard a lot of commentary that Powell

0:08:26.920 --> 0:08:29.920
<v Speaker 1>has been speaking a lot and talking about those big

0:08:29.960 --> 0:08:32.679
<v Speaker 1>moves and the potential from maybe fifty basis points are

0:08:32.679 --> 0:08:36.679
<v Speaker 1>moving faster than to make sure that the equity markets

0:08:36.679 --> 0:08:39.520
<v Speaker 1>are doing a lot of his job for him when

0:08:39.600 --> 0:08:43.280
<v Speaker 1>it comes to some of those fight UH tightening financial conditions.

0:08:43.480 --> 0:08:47.960
<v Speaker 1>How are you thinking about the messaging from this Federal Reserve? Well,

0:08:48.000 --> 0:08:50.520
<v Speaker 1>and in fact, they've done a very good job I

0:08:50.559 --> 0:08:54.320
<v Speaker 1>think of removing a lot of a doubt once the

0:08:54.440 --> 0:08:58.960
<v Speaker 1>pivot began in November when transitory was taken out of

0:08:59.040 --> 0:09:03.440
<v Speaker 1>the out of their their playbook, and it became obvious

0:09:03.520 --> 0:09:05.600
<v Speaker 1>that this was a pretty serious issue that was not

0:09:05.720 --> 0:09:09.280
<v Speaker 1>going away in terms of inflation. Ever since November, you know,

0:09:09.360 --> 0:09:12.319
<v Speaker 1>four months ago, we now have seen a pretty consistent,

0:09:12.440 --> 0:09:15.520
<v Speaker 1>solid messaging coming out from the Fed. And I do

0:09:15.640 --> 0:09:19.000
<v Speaker 1>think if you look at public equities as an example,

0:09:19.200 --> 0:09:23.880
<v Speaker 1>have pretty much fully recovered values um, you know, certainly

0:09:23.880 --> 0:09:27.160
<v Speaker 1>over the last thirty days as we saw following the

0:09:27.280 --> 0:09:32.480
<v Speaker 1>Ukraine UH invasion February twenty four, so I think that

0:09:32.720 --> 0:09:38.040
<v Speaker 1>generally markets have factored in both the worst case scenario

0:09:38.160 --> 0:09:41.360
<v Speaker 1>at least we hope um for the Ukraine war, and

0:09:41.360 --> 0:09:45.080
<v Speaker 1>then also to some extent where the ultimate endgame is

0:09:45.160 --> 0:09:48.200
<v Speaker 1>for the FED, which they've advertised pretty much is going

0:09:48.280 --> 0:09:50.320
<v Speaker 1>to end up at a kind of two to three

0:09:51.160 --> 0:09:55.040
<v Speaker 1>uh FED funds rate, which would then match expected inflation.

0:09:55.080 --> 0:09:58.040
<v Speaker 1>And I think we're seeing, um, you know, some stability

0:09:58.040 --> 0:10:00.880
<v Speaker 1>in all markets. We still have not a new issue

0:10:01.559 --> 0:10:04.880
<v Speaker 1>UH deal flow would turn to the high yield market

0:10:05.760 --> 0:10:08.400
<v Speaker 1>or the leverage loan market in the great extent, but

0:10:08.480 --> 0:10:11.080
<v Speaker 1>at least things have calmed down certainly over the last

0:10:11.080 --> 0:10:13.960
<v Speaker 1>several days. Yeah, Randy, that that's where I wanted to go.

0:10:14.040 --> 0:10:16.319
<v Speaker 1>I want, I want to take advantage of your experience

0:10:16.360 --> 0:10:20.840
<v Speaker 1>in the leverage loan business, you know, with rising interest rates,

0:10:20.880 --> 0:10:23.240
<v Speaker 1>how do you think you know, theo's private equity folks,

0:10:23.240 --> 0:10:27.240
<v Speaker 1>which are such big consumers of of leverage debt leverage loans,

0:10:27.800 --> 0:10:29.520
<v Speaker 1>how do you envision the M and A market over

0:10:29.520 --> 0:10:31.920
<v Speaker 1>the next say, twelve months, we can see a pullback

0:10:31.920 --> 0:10:35.080
<v Speaker 1>and activity. Do you think, Well, we came off a

0:10:35.160 --> 0:10:39.840
<v Speaker 1>huge not just the Churchill but also just you know,

0:10:39.880 --> 0:10:43.600
<v Speaker 1>with private equity deployment, private credit deployment. It was in

0:10:43.640 --> 0:10:45.880
<v Speaker 1>many ways probably an environment that would be hard to

0:10:45.880 --> 0:10:49.400
<v Speaker 1>replicate for this year. We still think activity UH and

0:10:49.640 --> 0:10:51.480
<v Speaker 1>the M and A pipeline is going to be solid

0:10:51.520 --> 0:10:54.199
<v Speaker 1>for this year. Certainly the economy. We believe people will

0:10:54.200 --> 0:10:57.600
<v Speaker 1>continue to be constructive for credit. It doesn't have to

0:10:57.640 --> 0:11:00.559
<v Speaker 1>be toward growth in order for credit to be two

0:11:00.640 --> 0:11:03.679
<v Speaker 1>to work UM. And I think private equity, which has

0:11:03.800 --> 0:11:06.800
<v Speaker 1>raised so much money over the last you know, three

0:11:06.840 --> 0:11:10.319
<v Speaker 1>or four or five, seven years, UM, that dry powder

0:11:10.360 --> 0:11:12.800
<v Speaker 1>which is going to be deployed, is going to be

0:11:12.840 --> 0:11:17.320
<v Speaker 1>deployed UM in partnership with direct lenders such as Churchill

0:11:17.400 --> 0:11:21.080
<v Speaker 1>that have worked with these private equity firms over many

0:11:21.120 --> 0:11:25.280
<v Speaker 1>different texts of markets and through volatility when the public

0:11:25.320 --> 0:11:28.840
<v Speaker 1>markets were either sidelinders set down, direct lenders such as

0:11:28.840 --> 0:11:31.920
<v Speaker 1>ourselves had plenty of dry powder to help the dry

0:11:32.000 --> 0:11:35.440
<v Speaker 1>powder of our private equi clients be deployed. So if

0:11:35.440 --> 0:11:37.240
<v Speaker 1>you go back upstream and look at where the M

0:11:37.240 --> 0:11:40.679
<v Speaker 1>and A market is, we're seeing evidence of another solid

0:11:40.720 --> 0:11:44.560
<v Speaker 1>year with a number of EM and A bankers who

0:11:44.600 --> 0:11:49.400
<v Speaker 1>are working on books to be launched over the next

0:11:49.440 --> 0:11:53.040
<v Speaker 1>thirty days. Reports we get from them is it's going

0:11:53.080 --> 0:11:55.880
<v Speaker 1>to be a very busy second quarter. And as long

0:11:55.920 --> 0:11:58.720
<v Speaker 1>as the the p that we've just been talking about

0:11:58.880 --> 0:12:03.440
<v Speaker 1>geopolitical and interest rates and inflation, which we think is

0:12:03.480 --> 0:12:05.840
<v Speaker 1>going to get under control in most of the conomists

0:12:05.840 --> 0:12:09.560
<v Speaker 1>believe it will as continue to go up. As long

0:12:09.600 --> 0:12:11.520
<v Speaker 1>as those things continue on the path, we think the

0:12:12.280 --> 0:12:14.400
<v Speaker 1>two is going to be poised for a little solid year.

0:12:14.480 --> 0:12:18.080
<v Speaker 1>From her and then Nani, alright, good stuff, Randy, really

0:12:18.120 --> 0:12:20.400
<v Speaker 1>appreciate you taking the time. Randy Schrimmer, co head of

0:12:20.400 --> 0:12:27.760
<v Speaker 1>Senior Lending and Senior Managing Director Churchill Asset Management. One

0:12:27.840 --> 0:12:30.840
<v Speaker 1>of the I guess the fallouts of the war in

0:12:30.960 --> 0:12:34.760
<v Speaker 1>Ukraine is it's really highlighting the energy dependence that much

0:12:34.760 --> 0:12:38.440
<v Speaker 1>of Europe, particularly Germany, has on Russia. And of course

0:12:38.440 --> 0:12:40.600
<v Speaker 1>that raises a question I think here on these shores

0:12:40.720 --> 0:12:43.320
<v Speaker 1>is how is the US position in terms of its

0:12:43.480 --> 0:12:47.440
<v Speaker 1>energy independence. Checking with Marian Brown, she's a president of

0:12:47.640 --> 0:12:51.480
<v Speaker 1>Southern California Gas Company, h Miriam, give us a sense

0:12:51.520 --> 0:12:53.480
<v Speaker 1>of you know, I guess a lot of people are

0:12:53.480 --> 0:12:57.400
<v Speaker 1>now probably thinking a little bit more about energy independence

0:12:57.960 --> 0:13:00.280
<v Speaker 1>given what we're seeing in terms of the uncertain these

0:13:00.360 --> 0:13:05.120
<v Speaker 1>and disruptions in Europe. How do you think about that? Yeah,

0:13:05.240 --> 0:13:07.600
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for the questions. So, when we think

0:13:07.600 --> 0:13:11.439
<v Speaker 1>about energy independence, especially these days, we think about meeting

0:13:11.440 --> 0:13:16.600
<v Speaker 1>the twin goals of energy security and the clean energy transition,

0:13:16.720 --> 0:13:20.280
<v Speaker 1>and how best to meet that And obviously, I think,

0:13:20.440 --> 0:13:23.360
<v Speaker 1>and you're hearing it from a lot of your viewers,

0:13:23.360 --> 0:13:28.440
<v Speaker 1>as it's about investing in diverse domestic resources and that

0:13:28.520 --> 0:13:31.760
<v Speaker 1>those resources need to increasingly be renewable over time. And

0:13:32.160 --> 0:13:34.520
<v Speaker 1>I think the important thing there is that gas, like

0:13:35.160 --> 0:13:38.920
<v Speaker 1>um like electricity, can be renewable. How do you make

0:13:38.960 --> 0:13:42.640
<v Speaker 1>it reliable? Now? I mean, we've talked a lot about

0:13:42.640 --> 0:13:46.960
<v Speaker 1>the importance of the shift to renewables, but when some

0:13:47.120 --> 0:13:49.000
<v Speaker 1>of those fail or we've done it in such a

0:13:49.000 --> 0:13:51.959
<v Speaker 1>way where it's so fast that it isn't reliable, how

0:13:51.960 --> 0:13:54.320
<v Speaker 1>do you make sure that that transition is smooth and

0:13:54.360 --> 0:13:59.920
<v Speaker 1>also reliable as well? Yeah, you complement renewable electricity, which

0:14:00.040 --> 0:14:03.720
<v Speaker 1>can be intermittent, to your point, with renewable gases, which

0:14:03.760 --> 0:14:07.280
<v Speaker 1>is what gives you that renewable and that reliability and

0:14:07.320 --> 0:14:10.640
<v Speaker 1>that resiliency. And that's why you're seeing this tremendous momentum

0:14:11.200 --> 0:14:15.160
<v Speaker 1>globally and also nationally on hydrogen. You know it is

0:14:15.200 --> 0:14:18.280
<v Speaker 1>an energy dense gas, but it's not a greenhouse gas,

0:14:18.280 --> 0:14:23.040
<v Speaker 1>and it makes renewables from sun and wind available seven

0:14:23.080 --> 0:14:26.360
<v Speaker 1>three sixty five days a year. What role does how

0:14:26.440 --> 0:14:31.200
<v Speaker 1>you're GM play. We think it's an important, growing part,

0:14:31.320 --> 0:14:34.120
<v Speaker 1>important part of the mix that's going to help us

0:14:34.160 --> 0:14:38.119
<v Speaker 1>to meet those twin goals around energy independence, energy security,

0:14:38.120 --> 0:14:42.200
<v Speaker 1>and clean energy faster UM. We see UM from our

0:14:42.280 --> 0:14:45.600
<v Speaker 1>end that the costs are coming down really significantly, and

0:14:45.640 --> 0:14:48.880
<v Speaker 1>what it does is it adds to energy diversity. And

0:14:49.000 --> 0:14:52.080
<v Speaker 1>any time you create a jump in the access to energy,

0:14:52.480 --> 0:14:55.240
<v Speaker 1>you're going to have a positive impact on energy prices.

0:14:55.280 --> 0:14:57.920
<v Speaker 1>And that's why you know our company has actually leaned

0:14:57.920 --> 0:15:00.920
<v Speaker 1>in on hydrogen and we announced the Big Project UM

0:15:01.040 --> 0:15:03.840
<v Speaker 1>a few weeks ago Angeles Link on it. Can you

0:15:03.880 --> 0:15:08.600
<v Speaker 1>talk to us about the specific challenges that California faces

0:15:09.160 --> 0:15:11.600
<v Speaker 1>In full disclosure, I'm from the Central Valley and in

0:15:11.640 --> 0:15:15.000
<v Speaker 1>the summer we joke we're politely asked to unplug our

0:15:15.080 --> 0:15:18.320
<v Speaker 1>appliances because it's a hundred and five degrees and there's

0:15:18.360 --> 0:15:21.040
<v Speaker 1>no energy and no one can afford an eight hundred

0:15:21.040 --> 0:15:24.480
<v Speaker 1>dollar electric bill when you're running the a C. So

0:15:25.080 --> 0:15:27.360
<v Speaker 1>can you talk to us about the specific challenges that

0:15:27.400 --> 0:15:33.160
<v Speaker 1>you're seen in California and particularly your southern California. Yeah. Absolutely,

0:15:33.200 --> 0:15:37.360
<v Speaker 1>California is a bit of an island on energy and

0:15:37.400 --> 0:15:40.640
<v Speaker 1>so UM we deal with a tense dynamic on supply

0:15:40.800 --> 0:15:43.520
<v Speaker 1>and demand. And to your point, I think that there

0:15:43.600 --> 0:15:46.880
<v Speaker 1>is an increased focus about needing to bring more supply

0:15:47.360 --> 0:15:52.480
<v Speaker 1>um to customers and also managed demand with energy efficiency,

0:15:52.520 --> 0:15:55.320
<v Speaker 1>and California does have a good story to tell on

0:15:56.000 --> 0:15:58.800
<v Speaker 1>on energy efficiency per capita. But I think you're seeing

0:15:58.800 --> 0:16:03.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot of focus in the state on bringing increased supplies. Miriam.

0:16:03.640 --> 0:16:07.000
<v Speaker 1>About nuclear energy, how does that fit into the equation

0:16:07.240 --> 0:16:10.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm hearing from certain folks within that space that you know,

0:16:10.680 --> 0:16:12.560
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of advances being made where you don't

0:16:12.560 --> 0:16:15.680
<v Speaker 1>you don't need to build these huge nuclear facilities that

0:16:15.720 --> 0:16:17.720
<v Speaker 1>pose a significant risk. Maybe you can do it on

0:16:17.720 --> 0:16:20.320
<v Speaker 1>a much smaller, more nimble scale. How do you think

0:16:20.320 --> 0:16:25.360
<v Speaker 1>about nuclear? Yeah, nuclear, that's a complicated issue here in California,

0:16:25.400 --> 0:16:28.440
<v Speaker 1>But I think it's a complicated issue federally because we

0:16:28.520 --> 0:16:32.160
<v Speaker 1>have a waste management issue. So I think it's whether

0:16:32.200 --> 0:16:35.600
<v Speaker 1>it's a solution today maybe not, but can is it

0:16:35.640 --> 0:16:38.480
<v Speaker 1>going to be a part of the solution eventually maybe,

0:16:38.560 --> 0:16:40.400
<v Speaker 1>And so I think that we're in a place to

0:16:40.480 --> 0:16:43.760
<v Speaker 1>accomplish the goals that we have. We need all technologies

0:16:43.800 --> 0:16:47.000
<v Speaker 1>on the table, and I would include that one. How

0:16:47.040 --> 0:16:51.080
<v Speaker 1>are you thinking about the impacts from Russia's invasion of Ukraine.

0:16:51.080 --> 0:16:54.080
<v Speaker 1>We've talked a lot about the gas market in Europe.

0:16:54.120 --> 0:16:57.080
<v Speaker 1>Your taking look at European gas prices already up thirty

0:16:57.120 --> 0:16:59.440
<v Speaker 1>or four percent on the day is Putin had been

0:16:59.480 --> 0:17:04.119
<v Speaker 1>looking to seek payment in rubles. Europe though, feels distant

0:17:04.400 --> 0:17:07.840
<v Speaker 1>right from the US and from your southern California. But

0:17:07.960 --> 0:17:10.480
<v Speaker 1>what do you see as the impacts if any UM

0:17:10.520 --> 0:17:14.800
<v Speaker 1>already here on this market. I think the lesson of

0:17:14.840 --> 0:17:18.520
<v Speaker 1>the last several weeks really is urgency. There was already

0:17:18.560 --> 0:17:21.280
<v Speaker 1>a trend and you heard about it at SERO Week

0:17:21.440 --> 0:17:24.600
<v Speaker 1>two weeks ago, on the drive for energy security and

0:17:24.640 --> 0:17:28.119
<v Speaker 1>clean energy transition. And I think that the experience from

0:17:28.160 --> 0:17:31.800
<v Speaker 1>from what's going on in Europe and Ukraine UM really

0:17:31.840 --> 0:17:34.280
<v Speaker 1>has put in urgency because I think, you know, this

0:17:34.320 --> 0:17:36.520
<v Speaker 1>won't be the last cold winter, and it won't be

0:17:36.560 --> 0:17:38.800
<v Speaker 1>the last hot summer that we just had, and it

0:17:38.840 --> 0:17:41.080
<v Speaker 1>won't be the last geo political event that we have

0:17:41.320 --> 0:17:44.520
<v Speaker 1>history may not repeat itself, but it sure does rhyme.

0:17:44.640 --> 0:17:48.800
<v Speaker 1>So we need to learn from this and UM accelerate

0:17:48.800 --> 0:17:52.560
<v Speaker 1>our investments UM towards towards energy security and the clean

0:17:52.640 --> 0:17:57.400
<v Speaker 1>energy transition. And Mariam just quickly here climate change. Boy,

0:17:57.640 --> 0:17:59.480
<v Speaker 1>you just see coming out of the great state of California.

0:17:59.520 --> 0:18:02.120
<v Speaker 1>If it's not wildfire, it's a mud slide, it's an earthquake.

0:18:02.320 --> 0:18:04.840
<v Speaker 1>How does climate change factor into how you kind of

0:18:04.840 --> 0:18:10.679
<v Speaker 1>think about your forecasting going forward? Climate policy is UM

0:18:10.800 --> 0:18:14.240
<v Speaker 1>really needs to be a factor in investment decisions and

0:18:14.560 --> 0:18:18.280
<v Speaker 1>managing climate risk is definitely part of our investment decisions.

0:18:18.320 --> 0:18:22.040
<v Speaker 1>And part of that is future proofing our existing infrastructure

0:18:22.040 --> 0:18:23.720
<v Speaker 1>and we've got a significant amount of it were the

0:18:23.800 --> 0:18:27.080
<v Speaker 1>largest gas utility in the country UM. And another part

0:18:27.119 --> 0:18:30.879
<v Speaker 1>of it is new infrastructure, so UM the announcement of

0:18:30.920 --> 0:18:35.960
<v Speaker 1>the UM large green hydrogen project that we announced Angeles Link,

0:18:36.240 --> 0:18:39.360
<v Speaker 1>that's part of it. And it's also as we modernize

0:18:39.359 --> 0:18:43.399
<v Speaker 1>our infrastructure UM that we look to make it resilient

0:18:43.640 --> 0:18:47.440
<v Speaker 1>to be able to adapt to changing climate and externalities.

0:18:47.680 --> 0:18:49.560
<v Speaker 1>All Right, Marian Brown, thank you so much for joining us.

0:18:49.560 --> 0:18:57.480
<v Speaker 1>Marian Brown, President of Southern California Gas Company. Let's switch

0:18:57.560 --> 0:19:01.960
<v Speaker 1>ears a little bit and talk about recession hedges. We've

0:19:02.000 --> 0:19:04.320
<v Speaker 1>been hearing a lot more. I think over the last

0:19:04.320 --> 0:19:07.280
<v Speaker 1>couple of weeks, if people talking about recession as a

0:19:07.359 --> 0:19:09.960
<v Speaker 1>result of this feder reserve action, then that might be

0:19:10.000 --> 0:19:11.720
<v Speaker 1>a risk. And a lot of folks are saying, where

0:19:11.760 --> 0:19:14.920
<v Speaker 1>do I go for some hedges? Is there any place

0:19:14.960 --> 0:19:17.359
<v Speaker 1>in the commodity complex that I can go for some

0:19:17.440 --> 0:19:21.560
<v Speaker 1>hedges on recession. Let's bringing Mike mcglogan's senior Commodity Strategies

0:19:21.600 --> 0:19:24.800
<v Speaker 1>for Bloomberg Intelligence. Mike, if if I'm looking for a

0:19:24.840 --> 0:19:28.040
<v Speaker 1>recession hedge, is there anything in your world of commodities

0:19:28.080 --> 0:19:30.560
<v Speaker 1>that I should be looking at? Yes, But I think

0:19:30.640 --> 0:19:33.240
<v Speaker 1>the first target should be gold because I think gold

0:19:33.320 --> 0:19:35.920
<v Speaker 1>right now is almost entirely dependent on if the stock

0:19:35.960 --> 0:19:39.760
<v Speaker 1>market goes down and if the Fed job owning works

0:19:40.080 --> 0:19:43.560
<v Speaker 1>and if yields them bond y'll start declining from these levels.

0:19:43.720 --> 0:19:45.920
<v Speaker 1>To me, that that would be the impetus for gold

0:19:45.920 --> 0:19:48.280
<v Speaker 1>to just break out because it's so ready. It's really

0:19:48.359 --> 0:19:50.919
<v Speaker 1>technically looks strong, fundamentally looks strong, but it has a

0:19:50.960 --> 0:19:54.159
<v Speaker 1>major headman right now. It's tightening, stock markets going up,

0:19:54.359 --> 0:19:57.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, higher rates, higher yields, if the stock market

0:19:57.600 --> 0:19:59.840
<v Speaker 1>finally rolls over, gold should be the best place to be,

0:19:59.880 --> 0:20:03.119
<v Speaker 1>in place that, you know, to really for a recession.

0:20:03.119 --> 0:20:04.679
<v Speaker 1>I think gol would be the best heage. Because we

0:20:04.680 --> 0:20:08.000
<v Speaker 1>get a normal recession, almost all commodity should collapse. And

0:20:08.040 --> 0:20:10.280
<v Speaker 1>that's the problem. Crude oil right now is almost on

0:20:10.320 --> 0:20:12.880
<v Speaker 1>the screen. It is almost triple that the US cost

0:20:12.960 --> 0:20:15.040
<v Speaker 1>of production, which is part of that boom that we

0:20:15.040 --> 0:20:18.160
<v Speaker 1>think we're going to have in commodity production in North America.

0:20:18.520 --> 0:20:20.320
<v Speaker 1>Talked to us more about that. I mean taking a

0:20:20.320 --> 0:20:22.720
<v Speaker 1>look at crude at a hundred and fifteen dollars of barrel,

0:20:22.760 --> 0:20:25.120
<v Speaker 1>and it was two weeks ago when we were looking

0:20:25.160 --> 0:20:27.520
<v Speaker 1>at one thirty five on some of the futures over

0:20:27.560 --> 0:20:29.920
<v Speaker 1>on that big Sunday night movement. I remember that we

0:20:29.960 --> 0:20:31.199
<v Speaker 1>saw and then there was a little bit of a

0:20:31.240 --> 0:20:34.720
<v Speaker 1>relief as we briefly did below a hundred. But wow,

0:20:34.760 --> 0:20:37.119
<v Speaker 1>I mean looking again back at one, what is that

0:20:37.240 --> 0:20:40.520
<v Speaker 1>telling you? Yeah, it's tell me that we're more likely

0:20:40.560 --> 0:20:43.359
<v Speaker 1>to have demand destruction now, because that's if history is

0:20:43.359 --> 0:20:45.560
<v Speaker 1>a guy in the significance of this rally is it's

0:20:45.600 --> 0:20:49.600
<v Speaker 1>the first one that's ever happened in crude oil futures

0:20:49.760 --> 0:20:54.840
<v Speaker 1>with North America net energy, crudeil, liquid fuel exporter massive exporters.

0:20:54.880 --> 0:20:57.200
<v Speaker 1>The most similar recent example was two thousand and eight

0:20:57.200 --> 0:20:59.960
<v Speaker 1>crudel got to the all time high and then collap

0:21:00.040 --> 0:21:03.479
<v Speaker 1>stated percent. The most recent example before that was from

0:21:03.960 --> 0:21:06.560
<v Speaker 1>forty and then back to twenty that high put and

0:21:06.680 --> 0:21:09.200
<v Speaker 1>then took fourteen years to take out. To me, we're

0:21:09.200 --> 0:21:12.920
<v Speaker 1>at similar risk now because this demand destruction significant and

0:21:13.000 --> 0:21:15.119
<v Speaker 1>virtually all that supply that people are saying is going

0:21:15.160 --> 0:21:17.520
<v Speaker 1>to leave the market from Russia is going to China

0:21:17.760 --> 0:21:20.719
<v Speaker 1>in virtually and China's demand has actually been declining. So

0:21:21.000 --> 0:21:22.560
<v Speaker 1>to me, that's the key thing. And then one thing

0:21:22.600 --> 0:21:24.400
<v Speaker 1>I'll leave you with. If you look on the forward

0:21:24.480 --> 0:21:28.080
<v Speaker 1>curve one year from now, crude oil's training around ninety

0:21:28.160 --> 0:21:31.040
<v Speaker 1>dollars a barrel. That's been a significant resistance and the

0:21:31.080 --> 0:21:35.280
<v Speaker 1>curve for about fourteen years, and the high and the

0:21:35.359 --> 0:21:37.800
<v Speaker 1>forward curve is still around one forty. So market price

0:21:37.880 --> 0:21:40.360
<v Speaker 1>for the short term pain right now, and longer term

0:21:40.359 --> 0:21:44.000
<v Speaker 1>supply comes back on and and the demand and goes backwards.

0:21:44.000 --> 0:21:46.720
<v Speaker 1>To talk to me though about the differences in demand destruction,

0:21:46.800 --> 0:21:49.119
<v Speaker 1>because I hear that if it's from a demand shock

0:21:49.280 --> 0:21:51.560
<v Speaker 1>then that number is lower. But if it's a supply

0:21:51.680 --> 0:21:54.919
<v Speaker 1>shock to where we are now, demand destruction may not

0:21:54.960 --> 0:21:57.119
<v Speaker 1>be until we get up to one fifty barrel. Is

0:21:57.119 --> 0:21:59.680
<v Speaker 1>there a difference in how you look at demand destruction

0:21:59.720 --> 0:22:02.600
<v Speaker 1>based on what the shock is and where that shock

0:22:02.720 --> 0:22:04.520
<v Speaker 1>is coming from. Yeah, well there's a fogg of a

0:22:04.520 --> 0:22:07.000
<v Speaker 1>war here. So this is the most significant event of

0:22:07.040 --> 0:22:09.400
<v Speaker 1>our lifetimes. And I've been around from the six decades.

0:22:09.720 --> 0:22:13.399
<v Speaker 1>This is this compared to the Gulf War. This is

0:22:13.440 --> 0:22:16.240
<v Speaker 1>nothing what Russia is doing and the destruction. I think

0:22:16.280 --> 0:22:19.159
<v Speaker 1>the key thing to remember is the psychological impact of

0:22:19.320 --> 0:22:21.800
<v Speaker 1>everybody in the world reading this on the tape. It's

0:22:21.840 --> 0:22:23.840
<v Speaker 1>not going to increase consumer spending. It's going to do

0:22:23.880 --> 0:22:25.919
<v Speaker 1>the opposite, and then there's a price factor. But the

0:22:26.000 --> 0:22:28.520
<v Speaker 1>key thing to remember is short term. We just got

0:22:28.560 --> 0:22:31.520
<v Speaker 1>the most stretched above you know, five year or four

0:22:31.600 --> 0:22:34.280
<v Speaker 1>year mean and crudel. Ever, yet the market didn't make

0:22:34.280 --> 0:22:36.840
<v Speaker 1>a new high. And why is that? Because it's a

0:22:36.880 --> 0:22:39.720
<v Speaker 1>different world now, so it's really hard to quantify it

0:22:39.760 --> 0:22:42.120
<v Speaker 1>exactly here. But I have to use my tools and say, sure,

0:22:42.359 --> 0:22:43.960
<v Speaker 1>from these levels, who can make a new high? But

0:22:44.000 --> 0:22:45.919
<v Speaker 1>if you look at the history of lessons, maybe we

0:22:45.960 --> 0:22:48.000
<v Speaker 1>get the one fifty. The enduring result is we go

0:22:48.080 --> 0:22:51.080
<v Speaker 1>back to fifteen stay there for ten years, which is

0:22:51.080 --> 0:22:53.679
<v Speaker 1>where we have been. Fifty has been basically the average

0:22:53.720 --> 0:22:56.720
<v Speaker 1>since the collapse in two thousand fourteen, and still it's

0:22:56.760 --> 0:22:58.560
<v Speaker 1>well above the US cost of production. But here's a

0:22:58.560 --> 0:23:01.840
<v Speaker 1>big difference. It's that dichotomy in North America really doing

0:23:01.840 --> 0:23:04.760
<v Speaker 1>well as a net commodity exporter and Europe and the

0:23:04.800 --> 0:23:07.639
<v Speaker 1>rest of the world getting heart hurt really bad with

0:23:07.760 --> 0:23:12.160
<v Speaker 1>recession and being net commodity importers. Mike, here's the dumb

0:23:12.240 --> 0:23:17.480
<v Speaker 1>question of the day. Can the world exist without Russian oil?

0:23:17.720 --> 0:23:21.040
<v Speaker 1>And most notably can Europe exist without Russian oil? Well,

0:23:21.080 --> 0:23:23.680
<v Speaker 1>that's the cool significant thing about this, Paul. We look

0:23:23.720 --> 0:23:25.480
<v Speaker 1>back this from from the future, we're going to see

0:23:25.480 --> 0:23:28.240
<v Speaker 1>they're fighting the twenties century war with fossil fuels, and

0:23:28.280 --> 0:23:31.680
<v Speaker 1>the world's focusing on the twenty one century war economic

0:23:31.920 --> 0:23:33.720
<v Speaker 1>and moving forward. And wait, so let's look at this.

0:23:34.119 --> 0:23:38.000
<v Speaker 1>Peak energy consumption or liquid fuel consumption US occurred about

0:23:38.040 --> 0:23:39.679
<v Speaker 1>four or five years ago and it's been in decline.

0:23:39.680 --> 0:23:42.200
<v Speaker 1>And that's even before e v S. It's just embracing

0:23:42.320 --> 0:23:45.240
<v Speaker 1>advancing technology. So once we get past this horrible period

0:23:45.280 --> 0:23:47.960
<v Speaker 1>of destruction the markets. The world's gonna say, Okay, there's

0:23:47.960 --> 0:23:51.080
<v Speaker 1>a better way we're gonna sell this. This process of renewables,

0:23:51.119 --> 0:23:53.560
<v Speaker 1>and it's already started before, so I own an EV

0:23:53.720 --> 0:23:55.840
<v Speaker 1>for a reason. But that's also going to ramp up

0:23:55.840 --> 0:23:59.440
<v Speaker 1>when the most significant key tool retiions of the entire

0:23:59.640 --> 0:24:03.280
<v Speaker 1>we've ever scene is that the whole manufacturing process in

0:24:03.359 --> 0:24:06.320
<v Speaker 1>automobiles switching to e vs. That's gonna just six Sorry,

0:24:06.400 --> 0:24:08.200
<v Speaker 1>but in the meantime we're probably gonna have to recession.

0:24:08.280 --> 0:24:11.119
<v Speaker 1>And yes, Russia we can do without their energy. The

0:24:11.160 --> 0:24:15.080
<v Speaker 1>problem is a fertilizer. That's what's gonna really hurt yields,

0:24:15.440 --> 0:24:18.719
<v Speaker 1>and that's going to be a really boom for the Cornbill. Alright,

0:24:18.760 --> 0:24:21.879
<v Speaker 1>Mike mcglogan giving us the lowdown on commodities, as he

0:24:21.880 --> 0:24:25.359
<v Speaker 1>always does. Mike mclogan's senior Commodity Strategies for Bloomberg Intelligence.

0:24:26.000 --> 0:24:28.480
<v Speaker 1>He is based in Miami Beach of Florida, which is

0:24:28.520 --> 0:24:30.560
<v Speaker 1>a scam in and of itself, and I will get

0:24:30.600 --> 0:24:33.480
<v Speaker 1>to the bottom of it at some point. Thanks for

0:24:33.520 --> 0:24:37.040
<v Speaker 1>listening to the Bloomberg Markets podcast. You can subscribe and

0:24:37.080 --> 0:24:41.160
<v Speaker 1>listen to interviews with Apple podcasts, or whatever podcast platform

0:24:41.200 --> 0:24:44.480
<v Speaker 1>you prefer. I'm Matt Miller. I'm on Twitter at Matt

0:24:44.520 --> 0:24:48.880
<v Speaker 1>Miller three. On bal Sweeney, I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney.

0:24:48.920 --> 0:24:51.600
<v Speaker 1>Before the podcast, you can always catch us worldwide at

0:24:51.600 --> 0:24:52.639
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio