WEBVTT - The A&G Replay Wednesday Hour 4

0:00:11.440 --> 0:00:15.680
<v Speaker 1>Broadcasting live from the Abraham Lincoln Radio Studio the George

0:00:15.800 --> 0:00:19.840
<v Speaker 1>Washington Broadcast Center. Jack Armstrong and Joe Getty.

0:00:19.760 --> 0:00:22.239
<v Speaker 2>Arm Strong and get Ki and no Hee.

0:00:24.960 --> 0:00:38.440
<v Speaker 3>Armstrong and Getty strong Man. Welcome to a replay of

0:00:38.520 --> 0:00:42.080
<v Speaker 3>the Armstrong and Getty Show. We are on vacation, but boy,

0:00:42.120 --> 0:00:44.400
<v Speaker 3>do we have some good stuff for you. Yes, indeed

0:00:44.479 --> 0:00:46.120
<v Speaker 3>we do. And if you want to catch up on

0:00:46.159 --> 0:00:49.479
<v Speaker 3>your ang listening during your travels, remember grabbing podcast Armstrong

0:00:49.520 --> 0:00:51.360
<v Speaker 3>and Getty on demand. You ought to subscribe wherever you

0:00:51.440 --> 0:00:56.160
<v Speaker 3>like to get podcasts. Now on with the infotainment. Some

0:00:56.280 --> 0:00:57.120
<v Speaker 3>breaking news just.

0:00:57.120 --> 0:00:59.800
<v Speaker 4>Out of our newsroom here at Fox thirteen. A man

0:00:59.840 --> 0:01:02.680
<v Speaker 4>is in the hospital after being shot in the leg overnight.

0:01:02.960 --> 0:01:07.880
<v Speaker 4>If the police say he was shot by his dog, seriously,

0:01:08.640 --> 0:01:12.520
<v Speaker 4>I don't think that's right. This happened just before four

0:01:12.600 --> 0:01:16.520
<v Speaker 4>am at a home on Whitney Avenue in Fraser Wow.

0:01:16.800 --> 0:01:19.679
<v Speaker 4>Police say the man was lying in the bed with

0:01:19.760 --> 0:01:22.640
<v Speaker 4>a girl with a gun on the bed. Police say

0:01:22.880 --> 0:01:26.479
<v Speaker 4>his dog jumped up on the bed, got his paul

0:01:26.560 --> 0:01:30.640
<v Speaker 4>stuck in the trigger and ended up hitting the trigger,

0:01:31.520 --> 0:01:33.000
<v Speaker 4>shooting the man in the thigh.

0:01:33.080 --> 0:01:34.240
<v Speaker 3>Wow accident.

0:01:34.319 --> 0:01:37.920
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, so the dog claims you pretend to throw the

0:01:37.920 --> 0:01:40.520
<v Speaker 5>tennis ball, you stick it in the couch cushion one

0:01:40.560 --> 0:01:41.560
<v Speaker 5>too many times?

0:01:42.040 --> 0:01:44.800
<v Speaker 3>Right, And Dora, I'm supposed to be there in the

0:01:44.840 --> 0:01:48.760
<v Speaker 3>bed next to you. And who's this? Huh? You cheating bastard.

0:01:48.840 --> 0:01:51.040
<v Speaker 3>When's the last time I went for a walk? Can

0:01:51.080 --> 0:01:58.400
<v Speaker 3>you even remember? Pow? Wow wow, bad boy, bad dog.

0:01:59.200 --> 0:02:02.320
<v Speaker 5>The dog ties him to a chair like reservoir dogs.

0:02:02.600 --> 0:02:03.840
<v Speaker 5>I'm not putting up with this anymore.

0:02:04.000 --> 0:02:08.280
<v Speaker 3>Right, Wait, so Jack Michael, do we have that the

0:02:08.760 --> 0:02:12.840
<v Speaker 3>two rappers were talking and gunshots went off? That's a

0:02:12.960 --> 0:02:15.760
<v Speaker 3>candidate for clip of the year. So I like the way.

0:02:15.960 --> 0:02:18.360
<v Speaker 5>Clearly this news anchor who's got a bit of a

0:02:18.560 --> 0:02:20.639
<v Speaker 5>kent Brockman Will Ferrell vibe.

0:02:22.000 --> 0:02:22.600
<v Speaker 3>Yes he does.

0:02:22.600 --> 0:02:26.240
<v Speaker 5>Apparently was just handed this breaking news not knowing he

0:02:26.320 --> 0:02:27.799
<v Speaker 5>was about to do a story about a man who

0:02:27.840 --> 0:02:32.320
<v Speaker 5>was shot by a dog at four am. Yeah, so

0:02:33.000 --> 0:02:37.880
<v Speaker 5>could happen. It's also possible that he was messing around

0:02:37.880 --> 0:02:41.000
<v Speaker 5>with his gun, or she shot him or something. They

0:02:41.000 --> 0:02:44.800
<v Speaker 5>don't want to tell anybody what actually happened, right, Yeah.

0:02:44.680 --> 0:02:47.639
<v Speaker 3>That's that's at least, although you know, it's not implausible

0:02:47.720 --> 0:02:50.880
<v Speaker 3>that if you are living the lifestyle where you're lying

0:02:50.919 --> 0:02:53.520
<v Speaker 3>in bed with quote unquote a girl who wrote that story?

0:02:53.560 --> 0:02:57.120
<v Speaker 3>Do they need a woman? I would hope. And there's

0:02:57.160 --> 0:03:00.960
<v Speaker 3>a gun laying there for some reason, you can't put

0:03:00.960 --> 0:03:03.880
<v Speaker 3>it on the nightstand even Yeah, you're living the sort

0:03:03.880 --> 0:03:06.360
<v Speaker 3>of lifestyle where your dog shoots. Maybe he or she

0:03:06.600 --> 0:03:09.960
<v Speaker 3>likes the gun pointed at them during their romantic times. Oh,

0:03:10.000 --> 0:03:12.560
<v Speaker 3>good lord, remember seeing.

0:03:11.800 --> 0:03:14.359
<v Speaker 5>No I remember seeing that in the Sopranos, Remember one

0:03:14.360 --> 0:03:16.480
<v Speaker 5>of them. Somebody liked having a gun to their head.

0:03:16.840 --> 0:03:20.960
<v Speaker 3>Tawdry? Its way too tawdry. No, a dog just shot someone.

0:03:22.720 --> 0:03:25.359
<v Speaker 3>This is time for frank talk. The pets are rising

0:03:25.440 --> 0:03:31.080
<v Speaker 3>up as I predicted. Go ahead, Michael, and choices we

0:03:31.160 --> 0:03:33.240
<v Speaker 3>got in life, those were your choices.

0:03:37.800 --> 0:03:42.000
<v Speaker 2>Somebody got shot. Oh how good?

0:03:44.360 --> 0:03:46.720
<v Speaker 3>Hold on the dirty dead? What do I want with

0:03:46.880 --> 0:03:47.480
<v Speaker 3>my idea?

0:03:47.640 --> 0:03:48.920
<v Speaker 2>Don't shut me?

0:03:51.880 --> 0:03:56.080
<v Speaker 3>Everybody, everybody, everybody that's the sort of guy who's in

0:03:56.120 --> 0:03:58.880
<v Speaker 3>bed with a girl and a dog shoots. They have

0:03:59.040 --> 0:04:05.400
<v Speaker 3>a much more relaxed, lighthearted view of shootings in the room.

0:04:05.480 --> 0:04:10.520
<v Speaker 3>On fire, shootings in the room. I mean, it's not

0:04:10.560 --> 0:04:14.480
<v Speaker 3>even an accidental shooting at the range or outdoors or something.

0:04:14.480 --> 0:04:16.240
<v Speaker 3>We're in a room with a number of people, A

0:04:16.320 --> 0:04:21.560
<v Speaker 3>gun guts off. Somebody's been shot. You good, I've been shot?

0:04:23.240 --> 0:04:26.560
<v Speaker 3>You good? You good? Everybody good? Okay, So as I

0:04:26.680 --> 0:04:30.040
<v Speaker 3>was saying, why you've different a different lifestyle than I have?

0:04:32.120 --> 0:04:33.600
<v Speaker 3>Who shot? Who?

0:04:34.120 --> 0:04:34.880
<v Speaker 2>Somebody got shot?

0:04:35.040 --> 0:04:41.880
<v Speaker 3>All right? Anyway, what are your plans today? You guys hungry?

0:04:41.920 --> 0:04:43.800
<v Speaker 3>I'm hungry? Yeah? Crazy?

0:04:43.839 --> 0:04:45.279
<v Speaker 5>Can I want to hear that other one, just the

0:04:45.279 --> 0:04:48.719
<v Speaker 5>beginning part where the news anchor gets to the because

0:04:48.720 --> 0:04:49.680
<v Speaker 5>I just find this funny.

0:04:50.560 --> 0:04:52.479
<v Speaker 4>We want to get you to some breaking news just

0:04:52.560 --> 0:04:55.200
<v Speaker 4>out of our newsroom here at Fox thirteen. A man

0:04:55.320 --> 0:04:57.560
<v Speaker 4>is in the hospital after being shot in the leg

0:04:57.640 --> 0:05:03.320
<v Speaker 4>overnight if his police say he was shot his dog. Seriously,

0:05:04.080 --> 0:05:08.360
<v Speaker 4>I don't think that's right. This happened just before four am.

0:05:08.880 --> 0:05:09.560
<v Speaker 3>Heah, you don't know.

0:05:09.640 --> 0:05:12.760
<v Speaker 4>The dog Hitney Avenue in the Fraser Wow. Police say

0:05:12.760 --> 0:05:15.640
<v Speaker 4>the man was lying in the bed with a girl

0:05:16.000 --> 0:05:19.040
<v Speaker 4>with a gun on the bed. Police say his dog

0:05:19.440 --> 0:05:22.400
<v Speaker 4>jumped up on the bed, got his paul stuck in

0:05:22.440 --> 0:05:27.520
<v Speaker 4>the trigger and ended up hitting the trigger, shooting the

0:05:27.560 --> 0:05:28.440
<v Speaker 4>man in the thigh.

0:05:28.520 --> 0:05:34.520
<v Speaker 3>Wow. Four in the morning. I ain't eating lambon rice anymore.

0:05:34.640 --> 0:05:41.360
<v Speaker 3>Give me some real freaking food. Was it a hunting dog? Oh?

0:05:41.880 --> 0:05:45.480
<v Speaker 5>Boy, so there's actual love and of course some background checks.

0:05:45.480 --> 0:05:47.560
<v Speaker 5>We don't know any of those things. Gun loopholes, what

0:05:47.640 --> 0:05:48.160
<v Speaker 5>went on there?

0:05:49.400 --> 0:05:52.320
<v Speaker 3>Wow? Wow? Well, and if I was going to make

0:05:52.320 --> 0:05:54.560
<v Speaker 3>a serious point about it, that's the very sort of

0:05:54.600 --> 0:05:59.239
<v Speaker 3>person the Democratic prosecutors would never enforce gun laws against.

0:06:00.560 --> 0:06:06.040
<v Speaker 3>They howl for more gun laws constantly. And then I'm confused.

0:06:06.560 --> 0:06:09.279
<v Speaker 3>You know what I walked into that didn't I? Yes,

0:06:09.400 --> 0:06:11.279
<v Speaker 3>you know, Perhaps it's best to just move on to

0:06:11.360 --> 0:06:14.880
<v Speaker 3>other fair I don't know why I enjoy giving jiv

0:06:15.120 --> 0:06:18.680
<v Speaker 3>names to features sets of stories, but I do. Jack,

0:06:18.760 --> 0:06:24.160
<v Speaker 3>So you get the choice between golden state of confusion

0:06:25.240 --> 0:06:30.920
<v Speaker 3>or how markets really work, I'll go much more sober

0:06:32.279 --> 0:06:34.719
<v Speaker 3>just because the lack of jiviness. I'm just curious after

0:06:34.760 --> 0:06:39.080
<v Speaker 3>the ridiculousness. Yeah, okay, So story number one why the

0:06:39.120 --> 0:06:42.400
<v Speaker 3>US keeps losing to China in the battle over critical

0:06:42.520 --> 0:06:48.240
<v Speaker 3>minerals Because everybody knows that the minerals, the rarest the

0:06:48.480 --> 0:06:52.120
<v Speaker 3>metals everybody's talking about that go into so much new technology.

0:06:52.880 --> 0:06:57.080
<v Speaker 3>He or they who control access to those things controls

0:06:57.080 --> 0:07:00.160
<v Speaker 3>the world economy to a large extent, And the obvious

0:07:01.000 --> 0:07:03.440
<v Speaker 3>issue with that is that if we continue to be

0:07:03.680 --> 0:07:06.760
<v Speaker 3>highly dependent on China to come up with those materials.

0:07:06.800 --> 0:07:08.960
<v Speaker 3>We're screwed as an economy the minute they decide to

0:07:09.000 --> 0:07:13.000
<v Speaker 3>tweak us or bring us to our knees. So you

0:07:13.080 --> 0:07:16.680
<v Speaker 3>have this story of the effort to get a big

0:07:16.760 --> 0:07:24.120
<v Speaker 3>giant New America and our allies run graphite mine and

0:07:25.600 --> 0:07:29.080
<v Speaker 3>the goal to challenge China's dominance over the world supply

0:07:29.120 --> 0:07:31.840
<v Speaker 3>of a critical mineral used in everything from electric vehicles

0:07:31.880 --> 0:07:37.640
<v Speaker 3>to submarine hubs. And so this Australia based mining company,

0:07:37.920 --> 0:07:41.600
<v Speaker 3>backed by more than one hundred million dollars of US

0:07:41.640 --> 0:07:47.280
<v Speaker 3>government financing, maybe a worthy goal. Kind of funny, there

0:07:47.320 --> 0:07:49.240
<v Speaker 3>wasn't any discussion of this, but this is what our

0:07:49.240 --> 0:07:53.080
<v Speaker 3>giant government does. Opened a mine in Mozambique and built

0:07:53.080 --> 0:07:56.160
<v Speaker 3>a graphite processing plant in Louisiana, the first of its

0:07:56.200 --> 0:07:58.880
<v Speaker 3>type in the US, and also signed a sales deal

0:07:58.880 --> 0:08:02.080
<v Speaker 3>with Tesla, which is historically brought graph height for cars

0:08:02.080 --> 0:08:05.200
<v Speaker 3>from China for the batteries specifically. But then things started

0:08:05.200 --> 0:08:07.080
<v Speaker 3>to go off the rails. China, which provides more than

0:08:07.160 --> 0:08:09.880
<v Speaker 3>ninety percent of the world's battery grade graph height supply,

0:08:10.480 --> 0:08:11.560
<v Speaker 3>jacked up its production.

0:08:11.840 --> 0:08:14.840
<v Speaker 5>How many what did the market? How many stories include

0:08:14.920 --> 0:08:21.960
<v Speaker 5>China supplies ninety eight percent of this or that way

0:08:22.000 --> 0:08:22.440
<v Speaker 5>too many.

0:08:24.040 --> 0:08:28.680
<v Speaker 3>And whether Trump's plans bear fruit or not, and whether

0:08:28.720 --> 0:08:31.520
<v Speaker 3>He's allowed to even get the plans going fully is

0:08:31.560 --> 0:08:34.240
<v Speaker 3>anybody's guess. But this is the very sort of thing

0:08:34.800 --> 0:08:37.600
<v Speaker 3>that he and his advisors are trying to wean us

0:08:37.600 --> 0:08:40.040
<v Speaker 3>from this sort of dependence. But anyway, the gist of

0:08:40.040 --> 0:08:42.920
<v Speaker 3>the story is so China, which provides more ninety percent

0:08:43.000 --> 0:08:45.960
<v Speaker 3>of the world's battery grade graph height supply, jacked up

0:08:45.960 --> 0:08:49.520
<v Speaker 3>its production, flooding the market and driving prices so low

0:08:50.000 --> 0:08:54.040
<v Speaker 3>that this mine, this company could not mine profitably. Wow.

0:08:54.520 --> 0:08:58.680
<v Speaker 3>Last May, the Biden administration delayed new rules that would

0:08:58.679 --> 0:09:02.680
<v Speaker 3>have penalized US buyers from buying Chinese graphite for reasons

0:09:02.679 --> 0:09:04.800
<v Speaker 3>that I don't recall, probably because they were trying to

0:09:04.800 --> 0:09:08.960
<v Speaker 3>get Shijin Ping to do something. In Mozambique, farmers resettled

0:09:08.960 --> 0:09:13.600
<v Speaker 3>from the mining company's mind staged protests, shutting down the mining,

0:09:14.400 --> 0:09:17.000
<v Speaker 3>and the Louisiana plant, now open for a year, has

0:09:17.080 --> 0:09:19.760
<v Speaker 3>yet to make its first commercial sale, and the company's

0:09:19.760 --> 0:09:22.600
<v Speaker 3>stock is plunged by around ninety percent since the start

0:09:22.640 --> 0:09:23.600
<v Speaker 3>of twenty twenty three.

0:09:23.800 --> 0:09:27.960
<v Speaker 5>Wow, that's really interesting and once again the difficulties of

0:09:28.000 --> 0:09:32.839
<v Speaker 5>a an authoritarian country where one guy can make decisions

0:09:32.840 --> 0:09:33.720
<v Speaker 5>in a democracy.

0:09:35.400 --> 0:09:38.800
<v Speaker 3>That's tough. Yeah, and as always, there's a lot more

0:09:38.800 --> 0:09:42.400
<v Speaker 3>detail and nuance to it, but we'll leave it here.

0:09:42.600 --> 0:09:44.679
<v Speaker 3>I love, love, love, love love the free market in

0:09:44.720 --> 0:09:48.280
<v Speaker 3>so many ways. It's lifted billions of people out of poverty,

0:09:48.520 --> 0:09:52.280
<v Speaker 3>on lace new medicines across the globe. It has profit

0:09:52.520 --> 0:09:56.439
<v Speaker 3>is the reason for charity. It's the reason charity exists.

0:09:56.760 --> 0:09:59.000
<v Speaker 3>You have to have more than you need to feed

0:09:59.040 --> 0:10:05.080
<v Speaker 3>yourself to to give to charity. Anyway, as we retrench

0:10:05.160 --> 0:10:09.240
<v Speaker 3>from the dream of globalization, though, there are going to

0:10:09.280 --> 0:10:11.320
<v Speaker 3>be some rainings in of the free market, and it's

0:10:11.360 --> 0:10:13.000
<v Speaker 3>going to be stops and starts. It's going to be

0:10:13.000 --> 0:10:15.840
<v Speaker 3>really difficult anyway not to get hung up on that,

0:10:15.920 --> 0:10:17.319
<v Speaker 3>because you could talk about it for a year and

0:10:17.360 --> 0:10:19.760
<v Speaker 3>a half and write five thousand page books on it

0:10:19.800 --> 0:10:22.640
<v Speaker 3>and not cover it. I thought this was interesting, how

0:10:22.679 --> 0:10:25.560
<v Speaker 3>markets really are. Jack the rise and fall of the

0:10:25.679 --> 0:10:30.439
<v Speaker 3>Napa Valley of Cannabis. When Colorado became one of the

0:10:30.440 --> 0:10:34.599
<v Speaker 3>first states to legalize a recreational marriage. You wanna and

0:10:34.640 --> 0:10:38.160
<v Speaker 3>an enthusiastic county commissioner in Pueblo said he wanted Pueblo

0:10:38.240 --> 0:10:42.480
<v Speaker 3>to become the Napa Valley of cannabis. And they talk

0:10:42.520 --> 0:10:44.680
<v Speaker 3>a little bit in the Wall Street Journal about the situation.

0:10:44.760 --> 0:10:47.600
<v Speaker 3>Big slaughterhouse had closed years earlier, steel mill had been

0:10:47.600 --> 0:10:51.360
<v Speaker 3>shedding workers. They're really hurting for jobs and tax revenue,

0:10:51.360 --> 0:10:55.240
<v Speaker 3>and a cannabis boom would do that for them. The

0:10:55.240 --> 0:10:58.240
<v Speaker 3>streets were going to be paved with gold, recalled one resident.

0:10:58.280 --> 0:11:00.240
<v Speaker 3>The elementary schools were going to be the great just

0:11:00.360 --> 0:11:04.480
<v Speaker 3>in the country. Then they talk about, you know, the

0:11:04.679 --> 0:11:09.000
<v Speaker 3>classic meme, how it started, how it's going. In the

0:11:09.120 --> 0:11:12.720
<v Speaker 3>first weeks, the only two shops then licensed in the county,

0:11:12.800 --> 0:11:15.960
<v Speaker 3>round rang Up combined one million dollars in sales the

0:11:16.000 --> 0:11:19.840
<v Speaker 3>first month, Wow, sending fifty six thousand dollars in taxes

0:11:19.840 --> 0:11:24.400
<v Speaker 3>to the county Colorado. Everybody was just thrilled and happy.

0:11:24.400 --> 0:11:29.080
<v Speaker 3>Decade and high. Decade later, Pueblo's dreams have gone up

0:11:29.120 --> 0:11:32.400
<v Speaker 3>in smoke. A once thriving industry of retailers, growers, and

0:11:32.480 --> 0:11:36.120
<v Speaker 3>cannabis oil extractors. There were more than two hundred of

0:11:36.120 --> 0:11:39.880
<v Speaker 3>these businesses in twenty seventeen in that county, more than

0:11:39.960 --> 0:11:44.280
<v Speaker 3>two hundred. It's collapsed only forty five remain. State records

0:11:44.320 --> 0:11:47.720
<v Speaker 3>indicate county tax revenue plunged from more than seven point

0:11:47.720 --> 0:11:50.320
<v Speaker 3>one million dollars to four point eight million twenty twenty three,

0:11:50.440 --> 0:11:52.640
<v Speaker 3>which is still a pretty significant amount of money. And

0:11:52.679 --> 0:11:54.560
<v Speaker 3>you could argue that they're just thinning the herd and

0:11:54.559 --> 0:11:57.800
<v Speaker 3>the stronger surviving the way it goes in capitalism. But

0:11:57.880 --> 0:12:00.440
<v Speaker 3>here's the problem. In California knows this too. It's been

0:12:00.440 --> 0:12:04.240
<v Speaker 3>a huge problem because the rosy rosy promise is made

0:12:04.520 --> 0:12:08.880
<v Speaker 3>to Californians in Colorado and is alike. Even after legalization,

0:12:08.960 --> 0:12:12.640
<v Speaker 3>illicit growers and sellers thrived, even right in Pueblo. Last year,

0:12:12.640 --> 0:12:16.920
<v Speaker 3>they accounted for seventy percent of the US market, according

0:12:16.960 --> 0:12:20.480
<v Speaker 3>to research companies. The black market dealers, unlike licensed ones,

0:12:20.520 --> 0:12:24.360
<v Speaker 3>face neither Texas nor red tape, so they're more efficient

0:12:24.559 --> 0:12:30.240
<v Speaker 3>and they're cheaper, and it's bad for your brain. That's interesting, man.

0:12:30.240 --> 0:12:35.000
<v Speaker 3>If you're counting on enough people smoking enough pot to

0:12:35.040 --> 0:12:37.200
<v Speaker 3>you know, make your schools great and everything like that,

0:12:37.200 --> 0:12:40.760
<v Speaker 3>that's just that's an interesting thing. It is, and it's

0:12:40.840 --> 0:12:45.960
<v Speaker 3>probably not a sustainable way to run a society. Nationwide,

0:12:45.960 --> 0:12:49.240
<v Speaker 3>only twenty seven percent of legal cannabis businesses are profitable,

0:12:49.600 --> 0:12:52.480
<v Speaker 3>which is down two percent just three years ago. Did

0:12:52.480 --> 0:12:56.400
<v Speaker 3>not know that. Yeah, investment is dried up, restructurings are rising,

0:12:56.480 --> 0:13:00.520
<v Speaker 3>and in Pueblo, sentiment about legal pot is swung the

0:13:00.559 --> 0:13:03.280
<v Speaker 3>other way, fueling a backlash against the county's embrace of

0:13:03.320 --> 0:13:09.400
<v Speaker 3>the industry. And again, it's kind of complicated and a

0:13:09.400 --> 0:13:11.800
<v Speaker 3>lot of nuance to it, but it's just it's not

0:13:11.880 --> 0:13:14.800
<v Speaker 3>nearly the dream it was sold to be. So ill

0:13:15.160 --> 0:13:17.120
<v Speaker 3>I'm sorry. And the one the one aspect you should

0:13:17.200 --> 0:13:20.480
<v Speaker 3>understand it's kind of intuitive is that if it's legal,

0:13:22.480 --> 0:13:27.760
<v Speaker 3>enforcing laws against the illegal stuff becomes so complicated because

0:13:27.880 --> 0:13:30.320
<v Speaker 3>you know, half of it sixty percent of it, depending

0:13:30.360 --> 0:13:32.680
<v Speaker 3>on where you are, is legal. And so what are

0:13:32.679 --> 0:13:34.280
<v Speaker 3>the coups supposed to do if they see a bunch

0:13:34.280 --> 0:13:35.280
<v Speaker 3>of guys smoking pot?

0:13:35.480 --> 0:13:35.560
<v Speaker 2>Right?

0:13:36.840 --> 0:13:37.319
<v Speaker 1>Arm Strong?

0:13:40.080 --> 0:13:43.000
<v Speaker 2>Why listen to arms Strong and Geddy on demand?

0:13:43.640 --> 0:13:45.640
<v Speaker 3>We're not boring. A lot of news is boring and

0:13:45.800 --> 0:13:48.880
<v Speaker 3>tedious and depressing. It makes you angry. You don't want

0:13:48.880 --> 0:13:51.640
<v Speaker 3>to live your life like that. Hey, I'm Jack Armstrong,

0:13:51.679 --> 0:13:53.840
<v Speaker 3>he's Joe Getty. We're Armstrong in Getty. We try to

0:13:53.840 --> 0:13:56.559
<v Speaker 3>bring you the truth and help you figure out this crazy.

0:13:56.200 --> 0:14:01.080
<v Speaker 6>Modern world about something about a comedic tone.

0:14:01.760 --> 0:14:04.920
<v Speaker 3>We have a one er. Yes, listen to Armstrong You

0:14:04.920 --> 0:14:08.160
<v Speaker 3>Getty on demand on the iHeartRadio app, Apple podcasts, or

0:14:08.200 --> 0:14:20.320
<v Speaker 3>wherever you get your podcasts.

0:14:20.360 --> 0:14:22.160
<v Speaker 2>The Armstrong and Getty Show.

0:14:23.880 --> 0:14:27.760
<v Speaker 3>We had a conversation last week that I was very

0:14:27.840 --> 0:14:31.880
<v Speaker 3>uncomfortable with, and I felt very guilty about it because

0:14:31.920 --> 0:14:36.480
<v Speaker 3>I concealed a truth during the conversation, confession being good

0:14:36.520 --> 0:14:39.280
<v Speaker 3>for the soul. I am here to confess it. But

0:14:39.440 --> 0:14:42.760
<v Speaker 3>like all good confessions, they work best in a multiple

0:14:42.880 --> 0:14:47.680
<v Speaker 3>choice format. And so I'm going to give you multiple choices,

0:14:47.720 --> 0:14:50.920
<v Speaker 3>but to up the ante, each of the choices will

0:14:50.920 --> 0:14:54.760
<v Speaker 3>get successively more evil. Oh boy, and you have to

0:14:54.840 --> 0:14:58.400
<v Speaker 3>choose which one I am actually guilty of. I'm so

0:14:58.560 --> 0:15:02.720
<v Speaker 3>uncomfortable right now. A I, Joe Getty have a second

0:15:02.760 --> 0:15:06.160
<v Speaker 3>wife across town, with whom I have two children. She

0:15:06.320 --> 0:15:08.200
<v Speaker 3>is in a legal alien and I keep her in

0:15:08.240 --> 0:15:11.920
<v Speaker 3>line by threatening her with deportation. Well, what's what's okay?

0:15:11.960 --> 0:15:14.480
<v Speaker 5>What's striking about this is you clearly didn't do that,

0:15:14.600 --> 0:15:16.920
<v Speaker 5>but you're going up the landing at worse.

0:15:17.040 --> 0:15:20.960
<v Speaker 3>They're going to get worse. Yes, yes, okay, anybody want

0:15:20.960 --> 0:15:22.280
<v Speaker 3>to go for a or you want to go on,

0:15:22.360 --> 0:15:24.600
<v Speaker 3>you want to roll the dice anybody, Michael, Clearly that's

0:15:24.640 --> 0:15:28.000
<v Speaker 3>not true. Okay, all right, b I am now and

0:15:28.120 --> 0:15:30.440
<v Speaker 3>have been for thirty years an active member of the

0:15:30.440 --> 0:15:33.160
<v Speaker 3>American Communist Party, and have been working to subvert the

0:15:33.200 --> 0:15:36.360
<v Speaker 3>Constitution with every ounce of my energy up to and

0:15:36.400 --> 0:15:38.800
<v Speaker 3>including acts of violence and sabotage.

0:15:39.440 --> 0:15:41.320
<v Speaker 5>So I think I think you've laid a really good

0:15:41.360 --> 0:15:45.360
<v Speaker 5>premise here because you've given two very bad choices obviously

0:15:45.480 --> 0:15:46.080
<v Speaker 5>not true.

0:15:46.240 --> 0:15:51.040
<v Speaker 3>Whatever something? What are hell did you do that? Right?

0:15:52.320 --> 0:15:54.400
<v Speaker 6>Am I going to want to associate with you after this?

0:15:55.240 --> 0:15:59.280
<v Speaker 3>I don't know, Comrade. Perhaps again from a conversation last

0:15:59.320 --> 0:16:03.400
<v Speaker 3>week in which I can seal the truth or possibility, say,

0:16:04.840 --> 0:16:11.120
<v Speaker 3>I had never seen Gladiator until this weekend. Oh wow, WHOA,

0:16:11.880 --> 0:16:15.920
<v Speaker 3>you saw the movie Gladiator? My secret shame? Gladiator one?

0:16:16.320 --> 0:16:20.360
<v Speaker 3>You were noted along with every conversation? Are you not entertained?

0:16:20.440 --> 0:16:24.680
<v Speaker 3>Ha ha ha? I assume grow. I assume you went

0:16:24.680 --> 0:16:26.480
<v Speaker 3>along with the factors because I watched it with my

0:16:26.640 --> 0:16:29.200
<v Speaker 3>son Henry a couple of weeks back before we went

0:16:29.240 --> 0:16:31.400
<v Speaker 3>to Gladiator two. He loved it and it reminded me

0:16:31.440 --> 0:16:33.200
<v Speaker 3>how much great it was. But I said it might

0:16:33.200 --> 0:16:35.800
<v Speaker 3>be in my top three movies of all time, and

0:16:35.880 --> 0:16:38.040
<v Speaker 3>I did not at that moment reveal you know, I've

0:16:38.040 --> 0:16:41.560
<v Speaker 3>never seen that Moe. Wow, that was good because I

0:16:41.640 --> 0:16:43.960
<v Speaker 3>knew the derision that would rain down upon Were you

0:16:44.400 --> 0:16:45.800
<v Speaker 3>probably okay twenty years ago?

0:16:46.040 --> 0:16:47.640
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, you were in the middle of raising kids. So no,

0:16:47.720 --> 0:16:49.160
<v Speaker 5>of course you didn't see that movie because I am

0:16:49.160 --> 0:16:51.440
<v Speaker 5>a house full of babies, including a one year old. Yeah,

0:16:51.440 --> 0:16:55.440
<v Speaker 5>I didn't see anything between I don't know whatever years

0:16:55.680 --> 0:16:57.840
<v Speaker 5>twenty ten and like a year ago.

0:16:58.680 --> 0:17:01.680
<v Speaker 6>I am impressed, Joe, because you carried on a full

0:17:01.680 --> 0:17:05.000
<v Speaker 6>blown conversation about that movie as if you it was

0:17:05.040 --> 0:17:05.760
<v Speaker 6>one of your favorites.

0:17:06.840 --> 0:17:08.760
<v Speaker 3>Well, you know, I read a lot, so I pick

0:17:08.840 --> 0:17:11.120
<v Speaker 3>up clues from the you know, contexts and stuff like that.

0:17:11.160 --> 0:17:13.399
<v Speaker 3>But you know, Jack, you make a good point. I

0:17:13.440 --> 0:17:16.600
<v Speaker 3>remember roughly when the movie came out. Hey, dude, you

0:17:16.600 --> 0:17:18.720
<v Speaker 3>got to see this is great. It's an unbelievable movie,

0:17:18.760 --> 0:17:20.600
<v Speaker 3>great guy and villain. It's like two and a half

0:17:20.680 --> 0:17:26.159
<v Speaker 3>hours long, and I'm my responss chance or if I'm

0:17:26.280 --> 0:17:28.720
<v Speaker 3>gonna have a couple two three hours, I'm gonna spend

0:17:28.720 --> 0:17:31.760
<v Speaker 3>it silently staring at a screen when you could hang

0:17:31.800 --> 0:17:33.800
<v Speaker 3>out with your wife or doing something. I mean, yeah,

0:17:34.000 --> 0:17:36.200
<v Speaker 3>not gonna happen. It was fun. Nobody could do what

0:17:36.280 --> 0:17:38.720
<v Speaker 3>Russell Crow did. I don't know what magic he had there,

0:17:38.720 --> 0:17:44.520
<v Speaker 3>but can you tell me you like Gladiator movies, Armstrong.

0:17:44.160 --> 0:18:02.119
<v Speaker 2>And the Armstrong and Getty Show.

0:18:14.160 --> 0:18:16.639
<v Speaker 7>Wall Street suffering it's worst day of the year, the

0:18:16.720 --> 0:18:20.479
<v Speaker 7>Dow closing nearly nine hundred points down after the President

0:18:20.600 --> 0:18:23.159
<v Speaker 7>refused to rule out that the US could be heading

0:18:23.240 --> 0:18:24.200
<v Speaker 7>into a recession.

0:18:24.640 --> 0:18:29.040
<v Speaker 5>Uh yeah, a lot of negative headlines about Wall Street yesterday.

0:18:29.080 --> 0:18:34.680
<v Speaker 5>I'm always interested in that. In that a lot, a lot,

0:18:34.840 --> 0:18:38.000
<v Speaker 5>a lot of Americans aren't in the stock market, and

0:18:38.440 --> 0:18:41.880
<v Speaker 5>it's I'd like to know what percentage of the audience

0:18:41.920 --> 0:18:44.960
<v Speaker 5>that watches mainstream evening news is in the stock market,

0:18:45.320 --> 0:18:45.880
<v Speaker 5>other than.

0:18:45.840 --> 0:18:49.200
<v Speaker 3>Are you including four one ks in that m Maybe

0:18:49.240 --> 0:18:49.600
<v Speaker 3>maybe not.

0:18:49.720 --> 0:18:53.399
<v Speaker 5>I don't know investments, but certainly the average person watching

0:18:53.400 --> 0:18:55.560
<v Speaker 5>the evening news is not into the daily ups and

0:18:55.600 --> 0:18:56.040
<v Speaker 5>downs of.

0:18:56.040 --> 0:18:59.480
<v Speaker 3>The stock market. True, they're in the long you know,

0:18:59.680 --> 0:19:00.840
<v Speaker 3>the law game.

0:19:01.119 --> 0:19:09.520
<v Speaker 5>And and very little context ever around any of this

0:19:09.560 --> 0:19:12.680
<v Speaker 5>stuff anytime. And I'm not just like now just always

0:19:12.680 --> 0:19:18.720
<v Speaker 5>there's almost no context. Biggest point drop whatever. Sometimes they

0:19:18.840 --> 0:19:22.680
<v Speaker 5>use points because it's more dramatic. Sometimes the percentage whatever,

0:19:22.680 --> 0:19:24.360
<v Speaker 5>and they go back and forth, and it's all very

0:19:25.760 --> 0:19:28.639
<v Speaker 5>it's it's designed to make it sound as great or

0:19:28.640 --> 0:19:31.080
<v Speaker 5>as awful as possible, to make it more exciting. But anyway,

0:19:31.280 --> 0:19:34.000
<v Speaker 5>New York christ and known this has been a big

0:19:34.119 --> 0:19:36.600
<v Speaker 5>down for the last week and a half or whatever

0:19:36.800 --> 0:19:38.880
<v Speaker 5>since the Tarif announcement. No doubt about that. New York

0:19:38.920 --> 0:19:43.080
<v Speaker 5>Post headline today, Buckle up NASGA. Dax suffers biggest loss

0:19:43.119 --> 0:19:46.240
<v Speaker 5>in three years. Dow falls eight ninety after Trump recession

0:19:46.320 --> 0:19:50.160
<v Speaker 5>dodge after Trump didn't absolutely just flat out say.

0:19:50.000 --> 0:19:51.200
<v Speaker 3>No to the recession question.

0:19:51.320 --> 0:19:55.399
<v Speaker 5>It's amazing how much news that made that one answer.

0:19:55.440 --> 0:19:57.919
<v Speaker 5>And he knew that, Like I said yesterday, he's aware

0:19:57.960 --> 0:20:01.440
<v Speaker 5>of that. He he double down on air Force one.

0:20:01.520 --> 0:20:05.719
<v Speaker 3>Essentially, the significance of it is he didn't say we

0:20:05.760 --> 0:20:08.720
<v Speaker 3>will do everything we need to to avoid a recession.

0:20:08.760 --> 0:20:11.560
<v Speaker 5>That's why that's significant, right, which gets to what we

0:20:11.560 --> 0:20:13.479
<v Speaker 5>were saying last hour. I wish he would give some

0:20:13.520 --> 0:20:16.080
<v Speaker 5>sort of speech where he explains what his long game

0:20:16.160 --> 0:20:18.439
<v Speaker 5>in is and why I think he can get more

0:20:18.480 --> 0:20:20.080
<v Speaker 5>people on board or calmed down.

0:20:20.840 --> 0:20:24.239
<v Speaker 3>I think that is so obviously a great idea. It

0:20:24.320 --> 0:20:28.560
<v Speaker 3>is shocking to me. It hasn't happened yet. Drudge hates Trump,

0:20:28.680 --> 0:20:33.400
<v Speaker 3>but his headlines economy cracks, stocks lose four trillion dollars. Oh,

0:20:33.440 --> 0:20:35.320
<v Speaker 3>that's one of the things about the news reporting.

0:20:35.359 --> 0:20:38.520
<v Speaker 5>I feel like it's for people who don't understand that

0:20:38.520 --> 0:20:41.880
<v Speaker 5>that money didn't actually disappear never to come back. It's

0:20:42.200 --> 0:20:44.840
<v Speaker 5>the stock is down and yet adds up to four trillion.

0:20:44.880 --> 0:20:48.119
<v Speaker 5>But unless you sold yesterday, you didn't actually lose the money,

0:20:48.160 --> 0:20:49.879
<v Speaker 5>and it could be back up in two weeks and

0:20:50.000 --> 0:20:50.719
<v Speaker 5>nothing happened.

0:20:50.760 --> 0:20:53.399
<v Speaker 3>I mean, well, and you quote unquote lost the money

0:20:53.400 --> 0:20:55.720
<v Speaker 3>from if you would have sold it three weeks ago.

0:20:55.840 --> 0:20:58.680
<v Speaker 3>So it's all imaginary. It's not even on paper, it's

0:20:58.800 --> 0:20:59.320
<v Speaker 3>in the ether.

0:21:00.240 --> 0:21:02.800
<v Speaker 5>So getting to Mark Alprin's newsletter today, who I think

0:21:02.840 --> 0:21:04.520
<v Speaker 5>he is a fair arbiter of these sorts of things,

0:21:04.520 --> 0:21:08.239
<v Speaker 5>and he gets a lot of He has a lot

0:21:08.280 --> 0:21:12.879
<v Speaker 5>of connections in left and right, Republican and Democrat. He

0:21:12.920 --> 0:21:17.000
<v Speaker 5>wrote this Monday, when job boning by all Trump economic

0:21:17.080 --> 0:21:20.520
<v Speaker 5>advisors could not stop a market selloff or deter business leaders,

0:21:20.560 --> 0:21:25.320
<v Speaker 5>economic analysts, analysts, Paul's and Trump supporters from calling, texting,

0:21:25.359 --> 0:21:28.280
<v Speaker 5>and emailing me to say the sky is falling, and

0:21:28.320 --> 0:21:32.080
<v Speaker 5>it is in their collective view explicitly and unambiguously Trump's fault.

0:21:32.720 --> 0:21:35.919
<v Speaker 5>In my career, I don't recall anything quite like Munday

0:21:36.040 --> 0:21:39.280
<v Speaker 5>as Whoosh, Team Trump lost the confidence of a bunch

0:21:39.320 --> 0:21:42.480
<v Speaker 5>of key actors in one fell swoop. I thought that

0:21:42.560 --> 0:21:44.840
<v Speaker 5>was interesting that behind the scenes a lot of people

0:21:44.840 --> 0:21:48.399
<v Speaker 5>that normally really really big on Trump recalling Mark Auperton

0:21:48.400 --> 0:21:49.800
<v Speaker 5>and saying, what the hell is he doing?

0:21:50.680 --> 0:21:56.120
<v Speaker 3>The business world, the American business world, was absolutely confident

0:21:56.200 --> 0:21:59.960
<v Speaker 3>that Trump would slash regulations and make permanent tax cuts

0:22:00.320 --> 0:22:03.800
<v Speaker 3>and that would be his main thrust. This whole call

0:22:03.840 --> 0:22:08.560
<v Speaker 3>it protectionism, you know, seeking a new global norm for trade,

0:22:08.560 --> 0:22:11.200
<v Speaker 3>whatever you want to call it, is surprising to them

0:22:11.240 --> 0:22:13.320
<v Speaker 3>and it's led to a great deal of uncertainty. Business

0:22:13.359 --> 0:22:17.439
<v Speaker 3>hates uncertainty, right. And then got to get to what

0:22:17.480 --> 0:22:19.800
<v Speaker 3>I was talking about yesterday, which I fully fully believe.

0:22:20.280 --> 0:22:23.879
<v Speaker 3>I mean, don't feel like the Wall Street journal crowd

0:22:23.920 --> 0:22:26.520
<v Speaker 3>has your best interest in mind. They have the best

0:22:26.520 --> 0:22:29.440
<v Speaker 3>interest of like what's gonna make the Dow close higher

0:22:29.480 --> 0:22:31.960
<v Speaker 3>today for a lot of the crowd who actually does

0:22:32.040 --> 0:22:35.199
<v Speaker 3>day trade or certainly this quarter, not what's best for

0:22:35.280 --> 0:22:38.720
<v Speaker 3>America long term, and you know, fortunately or unfortunately, I guess,

0:22:39.040 --> 0:22:41.560
<v Speaker 3>and Ryan would say, that's the way it's supposed to work.

0:22:41.600 --> 0:22:43.520
<v Speaker 5>You know, they're looking out for themselves. That's what drives

0:22:43.560 --> 0:22:46.560
<v Speaker 5>the whole thing. But yeah, I would.

0:22:46.400 --> 0:22:49.240
<v Speaker 3>Say, as a guy who reads practically cover to cover

0:22:49.320 --> 0:22:52.800
<v Speaker 3>the journal every single day, they have a wide range

0:22:53.080 --> 0:22:57.960
<v Speaker 3>of opinions and writers there. Not all of them are

0:22:58.119 --> 0:22:59.639
<v Speaker 3>merely chasing quarterly profits.

0:22:59.680 --> 0:23:04.960
<v Speaker 5>But I wanted to get to this and I didn't

0:23:04.960 --> 0:23:07.120
<v Speaker 5>know this. So Mark Alpernan has a bunch of links

0:23:07.160 --> 0:23:10.000
<v Speaker 5>to a whole bunch of different newspaper articles talking about

0:23:10.040 --> 0:23:13.800
<v Speaker 5>the how much damage has been done, whether it's temporary,

0:23:13.800 --> 0:23:15.240
<v Speaker 5>long term, blah blah blah.

0:23:15.280 --> 0:23:16.160
<v Speaker 3>Than this team.

0:23:16.200 --> 0:23:17.919
<v Speaker 5>Trump came in with the theory of the case that

0:23:17.960 --> 0:23:21.920
<v Speaker 5>they could rebalance the economy by shifting economic activity back

0:23:21.960 --> 0:23:25.160
<v Speaker 5>to the private sector from the public sector. It's part

0:23:25.160 --> 0:23:28.959
<v Speaker 5>of the whole doge thing and tariffs together. Trump advisors

0:23:28.960 --> 0:23:31.480
<v Speaker 5>have said they think the government is now twenty five

0:23:31.560 --> 0:23:36.680
<v Speaker 5>percent of the economy. Mark Alprin said, in reality, it's

0:23:36.760 --> 0:23:41.960
<v Speaker 5>way higher, maybe closer to fifty percent. Wow, what fifty

0:23:42.040 --> 0:23:46.680
<v Speaker 5>percent of the economy is the government? With Medicare and medicaid.

0:23:46.880 --> 0:23:48.959
<v Speaker 5>No one wants to admit it, but to a large extent,

0:23:49.160 --> 0:23:52.280
<v Speaker 5>the US economy has really just become the US government

0:23:52.320 --> 0:23:55.520
<v Speaker 5>spending in transfers. This is evidenced by the fact that

0:23:55.560 --> 0:23:58.520
<v Speaker 5>we've been running huge fiscal deficits during strong economic times.

0:23:59.080 --> 0:24:01.879
<v Speaker 5>And the new Terresury Secretary is proposed fixing this by

0:24:01.920 --> 0:24:05.399
<v Speaker 5>cutting government spending with musk combined with tariffs to rebounce trade,

0:24:05.480 --> 0:24:07.280
<v Speaker 5>to rebuild American manufacturing.

0:24:07.440 --> 0:24:10.439
<v Speaker 3>But to bring it home, he gets into, we live

0:24:10.480 --> 0:24:13.879
<v Speaker 3>in a wah blah blah blah blah blah. The top

0:24:14.000 --> 0:24:18.080
<v Speaker 3>ten percent. Studies have shown there's a very high correlation

0:24:18.240 --> 0:24:23.040
<v Speaker 3>between their propensity to spend with spending being you know,

0:24:23.080 --> 0:24:27.680
<v Speaker 3>two thirds of our economies people going out and spending money,

0:24:28.440 --> 0:24:32.480
<v Speaker 3>and where the stock prices are. For whatever reason, when

0:24:32.560 --> 0:24:35.880
<v Speaker 3>the top ten percent are feeling wealthy, they buy stuff.

0:24:36.160 --> 0:24:40.000
<v Speaker 3>But if they're not feeling wealthy, they don't. And this

0:24:40.280 --> 0:24:42.800
<v Speaker 3>especially is true now, and this could get us into

0:24:42.840 --> 0:24:50.080
<v Speaker 3>a real doom loop of tariffs, negative feelings, stock market

0:24:50.119 --> 0:24:53.000
<v Speaker 3>going down, people pulling back, et cetera, et cetera, cutting

0:24:53.080 --> 0:24:55.680
<v Speaker 3>the government, which is half the economy. You see, there's

0:24:55.720 --> 0:24:56.280
<v Speaker 3>the spiral.

0:24:56.520 --> 0:24:59.080
<v Speaker 5>If doge is laying off people and cutting the government,

0:24:59.080 --> 0:25:01.720
<v Speaker 5>and it's fifty percent of the economy that automatically is

0:25:01.760 --> 0:25:03.920
<v Speaker 5>going to drop the economy, which makes the rich ten

0:25:03.960 --> 0:25:06.480
<v Speaker 5>percent spend less, which drops the economy.

0:25:06.520 --> 0:25:07.879
<v Speaker 3>And it's just that, you see, it's a cycle that

0:25:07.920 --> 0:25:11.320
<v Speaker 3>could catch on. Yeah. My My only objection to that

0:25:11.440 --> 0:25:14.080
<v Speaker 3>theory or a question I have about it, is that

0:25:14.720 --> 0:25:20.160
<v Speaker 3>what doge is doing is nibbling around the edges of

0:25:20.200 --> 0:25:25.200
<v Speaker 3>the actual fiscal pie. True. I don't appreciate it because

0:25:25.240 --> 0:25:29.959
<v Speaker 3>I like the edges of the pie. Oh fiscal piebius uh.

0:25:30.000 --> 0:25:32.960
<v Speaker 3>And it's funny because you have conservatives saying they're they're

0:25:33.000 --> 0:25:35.840
<v Speaker 3>they're not attacking entitlements and that's most of the budget

0:25:35.880 --> 0:25:38.880
<v Speaker 3>blah blah blah blah blah. But at the same time

0:25:38.920 --> 0:25:41.240
<v Speaker 3>it might cause a doom loop. I just I don't

0:25:41.320 --> 0:25:41.920
<v Speaker 3>I don't know.

0:25:44.320 --> 0:25:46.800
<v Speaker 5>Well, nobody ever knows on any of this stuff, as

0:25:46.800 --> 0:25:51.480
<v Speaker 5>we've said for years, because if you were the old thing,

0:25:51.520 --> 0:25:54.120
<v Speaker 5>if you ask you know, ten economists, you'll get eleven opinions.

0:25:55.840 --> 0:25:59.800
<v Speaker 5>Or there's only two people that understand, uh, the global

0:26:00.359 --> 0:26:03.879
<v Speaker 5>and they don't agree you know, any of those sayings.

0:26:03.920 --> 0:26:06.359
<v Speaker 5>And but you know, if you could predict this stuff, well,

0:26:06.440 --> 0:26:09.480
<v Speaker 5>you'd be the richest person on planet Earth, you know, immediately.

0:26:10.680 --> 0:26:12.679
<v Speaker 5>So you know, there's a lot of moving pieces and

0:26:12.720 --> 0:26:14.960
<v Speaker 5>theory and everything like that. But I do find that

0:26:15.200 --> 0:26:18.560
<v Speaker 5>very troubling. Yeah, all of it's troubling.

0:26:19.160 --> 0:26:21.600
<v Speaker 3>I find myself imagining if Trump were to craft the

0:26:21.640 --> 0:26:26.040
<v Speaker 3>sort of message you've suggested, explaining exactly what his goals are,

0:26:26.680 --> 0:26:29.000
<v Speaker 3>why it's going to be worth enduring a bit of

0:26:29.040 --> 0:26:32.440
<v Speaker 3>pain or upheaval for a while, be it two years

0:26:32.520 --> 0:26:34.840
<v Speaker 3>or more likely five or ten or fifteen or twenty years,

0:26:36.200 --> 0:26:40.960
<v Speaker 3>because that would get the popular support. Doing something difficult

0:26:41.200 --> 0:26:44.720
<v Speaker 3>would require, because there's one thing democracies are terrible at.

0:26:45.000 --> 0:26:48.879
<v Speaker 3>That's doing what is difficult. Like in your family, you

0:26:48.880 --> 0:26:52.840
<v Speaker 3>could say, hey, we are going to severely restrict spending

0:26:52.880 --> 0:26:55.639
<v Speaker 3>for this year to get a down payment together to

0:26:55.720 --> 0:26:58.480
<v Speaker 3>buy the house, or make the investment or open the

0:26:58.520 --> 0:26:59.639
<v Speaker 3>business we've long dreamed of.

0:27:00.119 --> 0:27:01.640
<v Speaker 5>You can do here on the wall of a house

0:27:01.680 --> 0:27:03.520
<v Speaker 5>with a pool and say this is why we're doing it.

0:27:04.080 --> 0:27:05.879
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. You know, I've always been a fan of the

0:27:06.080 --> 0:27:09.960
<v Speaker 3>like the thermometer thing where you actually track your savings,

0:27:10.000 --> 0:27:12.159
<v Speaker 3>because it gives you enthusiasm for it. Judy and I

0:27:12.280 --> 0:27:15.480
<v Speaker 3>used to do that when we were young. Anyway, as

0:27:15.520 --> 0:27:18.120
<v Speaker 3>a family, you can do that. But democracies are famously

0:27:18.280 --> 0:27:21.280
<v Speaker 3>horrible at saying all right, we're all going to endure

0:27:21.320 --> 0:27:24.480
<v Speaker 3>some pain for a while, an austerity plan. It happens.

0:27:24.520 --> 0:27:26.360
<v Speaker 3>I don't think it's hard to get going. I don't

0:27:26.400 --> 0:27:29.400
<v Speaker 3>think we're grown up enough for this. I think we're

0:27:29.400 --> 0:27:33.880
<v Speaker 3>too used to easy sailing, smooth saling. But even if

0:27:33.880 --> 0:27:37.080
<v Speaker 3>Trump were to do that, though, Wall Street would probably

0:27:37.119 --> 0:27:40.560
<v Speaker 3>freak out for a while, and then people would see it,

0:27:40.960 --> 0:27:44.400
<v Speaker 3>would check their four one ks and freak out. And

0:27:45.640 --> 0:27:48.680
<v Speaker 3>I just I don't know if we have the right

0:27:48.760 --> 0:27:55.600
<v Speaker 3>stuff to institute what Trump's talking about before it's a

0:27:55.600 --> 0:27:56.840
<v Speaker 3>horrible emergency.

0:27:56.840 --> 0:27:59.879
<v Speaker 5>Well, imagine if Trump or somebody representing Trump came out

0:27:59.920 --> 0:28:02.760
<v Speaker 5>and gave a speech says, look, half the economy is

0:28:02.760 --> 0:28:04.960
<v Speaker 5>the government. Do you know that half the economy is

0:28:05.000 --> 0:28:07.919
<v Speaker 5>the government? And that can't be that's not sustainable. And

0:28:07.920 --> 0:28:10.640
<v Speaker 5>our debt is this, and our deficit is this, and

0:28:10.680 --> 0:28:13.439
<v Speaker 5>you know our payments are this, and blah blah blah.

0:28:13.520 --> 0:28:16.120
<v Speaker 5>And if that wasn't go ahead, sorry there's more.

0:28:16.359 --> 0:28:18.720
<v Speaker 3>No, that's fine, I was gonna say. And if if

0:28:18.720 --> 0:28:21.280
<v Speaker 3>that wasn't bad enough. Folks, here's the chunk of the

0:28:21.320 --> 0:28:25.399
<v Speaker 3>economy that would collapse and you would starve if China

0:28:25.520 --> 0:28:28.920
<v Speaker 3>decides to jump ugly. So A, we got to reign

0:28:29.000 --> 0:28:31.720
<v Speaker 3>in the government. B. We've got to wean ourselves from

0:28:31.760 --> 0:28:36.600
<v Speaker 3>being China junkies. Their economic heroin is is they're gonna

0:28:36.680 --> 0:28:38.480
<v Speaker 3>pull it back on us, and we're gonna be on

0:28:38.560 --> 0:28:41.240
<v Speaker 3>our hands and knees, and our economy is gonna be

0:28:41.280 --> 0:28:44.640
<v Speaker 3>puking and turning green and pooping on itself. Wow, because

0:28:44.640 --> 0:28:47.440
<v Speaker 3>they're gonna pull it out cold turkey. Do you want that?

0:28:47.600 --> 0:28:50.880
<v Speaker 3>Do you want that? Huh? Okay, We're gonna restructure the economy.

0:28:51.000 --> 0:28:54.640
<v Speaker 3>You would be a disgusting economics teacher. Yeah, but compelling.

0:28:55.160 --> 0:28:59.040
<v Speaker 3>M Uh. There's no way this works because we have

0:28:59.080 --> 0:29:00.280
<v Speaker 3>an election every two year. Years.

0:29:00.280 --> 0:29:04.920
<v Speaker 5>Were already like a year away from constantly talking about

0:29:05.640 --> 0:29:09.959
<v Speaker 5>the mid terms and uh, and and the Democrats are

0:29:09.960 --> 0:29:12.840
<v Speaker 5>gonna run on He says, we can't blah blah blah.

0:29:12.880 --> 0:29:17.480
<v Speaker 3>We say you you we can lose with me. Everybody says, yeah,

0:29:17.600 --> 0:29:20.880
<v Speaker 3>I want everything for nothing, and and there you go.

0:29:21.400 --> 0:29:22.760
<v Speaker 3>So to summarize, we're toomed.

0:29:23.760 --> 0:29:28.239
<v Speaker 5>I'm moving along, aren't you glad you tuned in. Oh boy, Well,

0:29:28.520 --> 0:29:31.520
<v Speaker 5>but everybody should me and everyone we should realize that

0:29:31.520 --> 0:29:34.520
<v Speaker 5>we're not retiring today. What the stock market does today,

0:29:34.600 --> 0:29:38.560
<v Speaker 5>unless you are retiring today. Somebody listening somewhere, if you.

0:29:38.520 --> 0:29:41.680
<v Speaker 3>Would have restructured your your investments.

0:29:41.240 --> 0:29:43.760
<v Speaker 5>If somebody somewhere on our seventy stations is listening, is

0:29:43.800 --> 0:29:45.680
<v Speaker 5>retiring today or yesterday?

0:29:45.680 --> 0:29:48.800
<v Speaker 3>He retired yesterday. I understand while you're upset.

0:29:50.040 --> 0:29:57.960
<v Speaker 1>Sorry, sorry, Jack Armstrong and Joe Armstrong and Getty Show,

0:30:10.640 --> 0:30:12.440
<v Speaker 1>The Armstrong and Getty Show.

0:30:15.720 --> 0:30:19.040
<v Speaker 3>So, speaking of generations, I thought this was both amusing

0:30:19.320 --> 0:30:24.720
<v Speaker 3>and slightly annoying. But it's an article about how evidently

0:30:25.280 --> 0:30:31.120
<v Speaker 3>some demographer social researcher by the name of Mark McCrindle

0:30:31.280 --> 0:30:34.880
<v Speaker 3>has become the go to guy for naming generations. Never

0:30:34.920 --> 0:30:38.280
<v Speaker 3>heard of this guy, and the just of the article

0:30:38.680 --> 0:30:43.080
<v Speaker 3>is that he believes the whole like coming up with

0:30:43.160 --> 0:30:46.360
<v Speaker 3>a groovy name for the generation and seeing if it

0:30:46.440 --> 0:30:48.480
<v Speaker 3>catches on is kind of dumb.

0:30:49.320 --> 0:30:52.800
<v Speaker 5>Well, I gotta believe that he or whoever was in charge,

0:30:53.240 --> 0:30:55.880
<v Speaker 5>they came up with gen X way back in the day.

0:30:55.920 --> 0:30:58.080
<v Speaker 3>I mean, this was the eighties when they started talking

0:30:58.120 --> 0:31:01.800
<v Speaker 3>gen X and far cool list generation name by the way,

0:31:02.000 --> 0:31:03.840
<v Speaker 3>not just because of my year of birth.

0:31:04.040 --> 0:31:05.920
<v Speaker 5>And then at the meeting where they came up with

0:31:06.000 --> 0:31:08.680
<v Speaker 5>jen Y, somebody should have raised their hand and say, hey,

0:31:08.720 --> 0:31:11.520
<v Speaker 5>I see like a problem coming down the road we

0:31:11.600 --> 0:31:14.360
<v Speaker 5>might want to get ahead of with this whole lettering fing.

0:31:14.880 --> 0:31:16.640
<v Speaker 3>We're running out of letters in the ouphant, what are

0:31:16.640 --> 0:31:20.760
<v Speaker 3>we gonna do? Well, you got this silent generation, who

0:31:20.760 --> 0:31:24.479
<v Speaker 3>weren't silent at all at the old hodown. And then

0:31:24.520 --> 0:31:27.480
<v Speaker 3>you got the Greatest generation, a fine generation, thanks for

0:31:27.520 --> 0:31:28.680
<v Speaker 3>winning World War Two.

0:31:28.480 --> 0:31:30.920
<v Speaker 2>But you know, some good somepod.

0:31:31.280 --> 0:31:33.520
<v Speaker 3>Then you got the baby Boomers. There are a bunch

0:31:33.560 --> 0:31:35.440
<v Speaker 3>of babies that once and now I'm a boomer, the

0:31:35.480 --> 0:31:39.440
<v Speaker 3>most selfish generation that had ruined everything. Oh there's that

0:31:39.760 --> 0:31:44.120
<v Speaker 3>is fair criticism. Hippies and yeah, damn hippies. And then

0:31:44.680 --> 0:31:47.240
<v Speaker 3>then you got Generation X, again by far the coolest name.

0:31:47.600 --> 0:31:49.600
<v Speaker 3>They go through a couple more letters, and then they

0:31:49.720 --> 0:31:51.840
<v Speaker 3>having a run out of letters, they go with Millennials,

0:31:51.880 --> 0:31:56.840
<v Speaker 3>and then then what's the next one? It doesn't matter anyway,

0:31:58.320 --> 0:32:01.240
<v Speaker 3>So this guy says, oh, we got to quit screwing around.

0:32:01.280 --> 0:32:04.920
<v Speaker 3>We'll just use Greek letters. Okay. So Generation Alpha just

0:32:04.960 --> 0:32:08.320
<v Speaker 3>happened a while back, But now it's generation beta. When

0:32:08.360 --> 0:32:10.920
<v Speaker 3>did alpha thing? Because I never even heard generation alpha?

0:32:11.320 --> 0:32:15.280
<v Speaker 3>I know, I know, but apparently those who talk about

0:32:15.280 --> 0:32:18.600
<v Speaker 3>this crap have. But anyway, the point is now it's

0:32:18.720 --> 0:32:22.240
<v Speaker 3>generation beta, and of course beta is an insult in

0:32:22.280 --> 0:32:25.240
<v Speaker 3>the modern world, right, it means, for instance, a weak

0:32:25.360 --> 0:32:30.200
<v Speaker 3>and passive man or something. And so there are parents

0:32:30.280 --> 0:32:33.920
<v Speaker 3>evidently who are offended now that their children are being

0:32:34.600 --> 0:32:41.160
<v Speaker 3>What can we stop naming generations completely? What is a generation? Even?

0:32:41.640 --> 0:32:44.720
<v Speaker 3>I mean Generation X fans for like twenty three years

0:32:44.800 --> 0:32:47.560
<v Speaker 3>or something. This is crazy. Well, there's a number of

0:32:47.600 --> 0:32:50.640
<v Speaker 3>problems with it that are fairly obvious. But at least

0:32:50.800 --> 0:32:55.480
<v Speaker 3>back in the day, you know how much changed between

0:32:55.640 --> 0:32:58.240
<v Speaker 3>you know, this decade and that decade, not a ton,

0:32:58.760 --> 0:33:03.560
<v Speaker 3>Whereas now, holy crap, if you're growing up in the

0:33:03.560 --> 0:33:07.720
<v Speaker 3>smartphone world, it's completely different than the pre smartphone world.

0:33:08.080 --> 0:33:11.600
<v Speaker 3>It just is, right, So let's go with more descriptive

0:33:11.640 --> 0:33:16.480
<v Speaker 3>names like the smartphonies or or all digital weirdos or

0:33:16.600 --> 0:33:22.400
<v Speaker 3>I don't yeah, I'm just spitballing here, yeah, yeah, yeah.

0:33:22.440 --> 0:33:25.720
<v Speaker 3>The change has been so massive so quickly you might

0:33:25.800 --> 0:33:28.920
<v Speaker 3>have to go like every five and a half years, right,

0:33:29.360 --> 0:33:32.719
<v Speaker 3>have a new quote unquote generation if you're cause you know,

0:33:32.880 --> 0:33:35.400
<v Speaker 3>mostly I think it's useless. But if I'm a boss,

0:33:36.400 --> 0:33:39.200
<v Speaker 3>and you can say, all right, this next person we've

0:33:39.280 --> 0:33:42.880
<v Speaker 3>known or we've hired is a beta zoomer, and you

0:33:42.960 --> 0:33:45.239
<v Speaker 3>look it up and you see, oh, beta zoomers are

0:33:45.280 --> 0:33:48.840
<v Speaker 3>extremely insecure and need to be coddled like little kittens.

0:33:49.400 --> 0:33:51.640
<v Speaker 3>On the other hand, they're rebellious and blah blah. It

0:33:51.720 --> 0:33:53.360
<v Speaker 3>might be a tool to help you deal with them.

0:33:54.000 --> 0:33:56.760
<v Speaker 5>Right, It seems like giant world changing events would be

0:33:56.760 --> 0:34:00.479
<v Speaker 5>better than just picking years like every so many years,

0:34:00.840 --> 0:34:03.760
<v Speaker 5>Like I mentioned, smartphones. COVID would be a good marker

0:34:03.800 --> 0:34:06.480
<v Speaker 5>if you were, you know, in if you're in grade

0:34:06.520 --> 0:34:09.919
<v Speaker 5>school during COVID, you, I know, teachers say those are

0:34:10.080 --> 0:34:11.200
<v Speaker 5>different kinds of kids.

0:34:12.320 --> 0:34:15.120
<v Speaker 3>How did jen X get its name? I mean, what

0:34:15.200 --> 0:34:17.720
<v Speaker 3>a what a what does that even mean? How about

0:34:18.560 --> 0:34:21.759
<v Speaker 3>Watergate and Vietnam made us very cynical? Plus half of

0:34:21.760 --> 0:34:25.200
<v Speaker 3>our parents got divorced. I mean it's kind of long,

0:34:25.480 --> 0:34:31.279
<v Speaker 3>but yeah, the latch Key generation anyway, Yeah, don't call

0:34:31.360 --> 0:34:37.279
<v Speaker 3>them generation Beta. It's hurtful, so so dumb. Did you

0:34:37.400 --> 0:34:44.400
<v Speaker 3>know that seventy percent of TikTok's revenue comes from live

0:34:44.600 --> 0:34:49.759
<v Speaker 3>streaming gifts. When people are doing live streamy stuff, do

0:34:49.800 --> 0:34:55.120
<v Speaker 3>you gifts or gifts gifts like presents. Yes, you can

0:34:55.160 --> 0:34:57.799
<v Speaker 3>give people these little things that are called what are

0:34:57.800 --> 0:35:02.720
<v Speaker 3>they called their like little tokens that they can redeem

0:35:02.880 --> 0:35:08.799
<v Speaker 3>into real money. It's huge into sex live streaming. We

0:35:08.840 --> 0:35:12.799
<v Speaker 3>need someone younger than us, Katie. Well, I'm trying to

0:35:12.840 --> 0:35:15.279
<v Speaker 3>explain it to you, you old man. I need somebody

0:35:15.280 --> 0:35:15.960
<v Speaker 3>who's done it.

0:35:16.400 --> 0:35:17.719
<v Speaker 2>Well, yeah, it's you.

0:35:17.880 --> 0:35:20.480
<v Speaker 6>Just go on and they have different dollar amounts, so

0:35:20.520 --> 0:35:24.160
<v Speaker 6>you can send from fifty cents up to one thousand dollars.

0:35:24.200 --> 0:35:28.279
<v Speaker 3>I think to tip them digitally exactly. That was at

0:35:28.320 --> 0:35:28.960
<v Speaker 3>digital tips.

0:35:29.040 --> 0:35:31.319
<v Speaker 5>Why did this catch on? Is it just easier or

0:35:31.360 --> 0:35:35.359
<v Speaker 5>more fun or well as opposed to and mowing them

0:35:35.440 --> 0:35:36.319
<v Speaker 5>or sending them a car.

0:35:36.520 --> 0:35:40.680
<v Speaker 3>Oh, it's immeasurably easier. You have an account, you click click,

0:35:40.760 --> 0:35:43.439
<v Speaker 3>they get a dollar your money, and then they can

0:35:43.560 --> 0:35:47.520
<v Speaker 3>show you their blankety blank or whatever. And TikTok allegedly

0:35:47.560 --> 0:35:51.000
<v Speaker 3>has filters for this, but they're super easy to get around.

0:35:51.320 --> 0:35:54.640
<v Speaker 3>You just use slang terms, including local slang terms. Because

0:35:54.640 --> 0:35:58.520
<v Speaker 3>it's global app and so there's an enormous child porn

0:35:58.760 --> 0:36:03.520
<v Speaker 3>market on Hiktok, These underage girls from all over the world,

0:36:03.880 --> 0:36:07.120
<v Speaker 3>who will you know, perform various acts or show off

0:36:07.200 --> 0:36:11.520
<v Speaker 3>or whatever and uh and and TikTok gets a cut

0:36:11.520 --> 0:36:11.719
<v Speaker 3>of that.

0:36:12.120 --> 0:36:14.160
<v Speaker 5>Well, first of all, I'll show you whatever part you

0:36:14.200 --> 0:36:15.560
<v Speaker 5>want to see for a five spot.

0:36:15.640 --> 0:36:18.480
<v Speaker 3>If there's any demand, give you a ten not to

0:36:19.920 --> 0:36:21.799
<v Speaker 3>that's what I'll do. I'll start a bigging war and

0:36:21.800 --> 0:36:24.480
<v Speaker 3>that's what I'll make my money. And they please don't.

0:36:24.520 --> 0:36:27.360
<v Speaker 3>We'll win out, but I'll be the benefit. It's not temptation,

0:36:27.480 --> 0:36:33.800
<v Speaker 3>it's extortion. I'll give you unny. It's a thread the Armstrong.

0:36:33.360 --> 0:36:36.680
<v Speaker 2>And Getty Show. Yeah, more Jack, more shoe podcasts, and

0:36:36.800 --> 0:36:37.600
<v Speaker 2>our hot links.