WEBVTT - How Primitive Will Our Descendants Find Us?

0:00:00.680 --> 0:00:03.400
<v Speaker 1>Hey, everybody out there in the Pacific Northwest or with

0:00:03.480 --> 0:00:06.000
<v Speaker 1>access to an airport or a car rental place that

0:00:06.040 --> 0:00:08.880
<v Speaker 1>can get you to the Pacific Northwest specifically at the

0:00:09.000 --> 0:00:13.240
<v Speaker 1>end of January. We'll see you in Seattle, Portland, and

0:00:13.320 --> 0:00:14.120
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco.

0:00:14.880 --> 0:00:17.320
<v Speaker 2>That's right to. Our new live show for twenty twenty

0:00:17.400 --> 0:00:21.040
<v Speaker 2>four is Seattle, Washington January twenty fourth at the Paramount Theater,

0:00:21.560 --> 0:00:24.080
<v Speaker 2>then Portland at our Homeway from Home at Revolution Hall

0:00:24.120 --> 0:00:26.000
<v Speaker 2>in the twenty fifth, and then winding it all up

0:00:26.040 --> 0:00:29.720
<v Speaker 2>at Sketchfest on the twenty six at the Sydney Goldstein Theater.

0:00:30.200 --> 0:00:32.879
<v Speaker 1>Very nice. If you want tickets, if you want information,

0:00:33.080 --> 0:00:35.400
<v Speaker 1>if you want tickets, you can go to a couple

0:00:35.400 --> 0:00:37.440
<v Speaker 1>of places. You can go to our link tree at

0:00:37.479 --> 0:00:40.240
<v Speaker 1>Linktree slash sysk, and you can go to our home

0:00:40.280 --> 0:00:42.760
<v Speaker 1>on the web, Stuff youshould Know dot com. Click on

0:00:42.800 --> 0:00:45.040
<v Speaker 1>the tour button and it'll take you to all of

0:00:45.120 --> 0:00:47.879
<v Speaker 1>the beautiful places you can go to buy your tickets

0:00:48.200 --> 0:00:49.800
<v Speaker 1>and we'll see you guys in January.

0:00:52.040 --> 0:00:59.800
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to Stuff you Should Know, a production of iHeartRadio.

0:01:01.760 --> 0:01:04.039
<v Speaker 1>Hey, and welcome to the podcast. I'm Josh, and there's

0:01:04.120 --> 0:01:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Chuck and Jerry's here too, and this is stuff you

0:01:07.040 --> 0:01:10.679
<v Speaker 1>should know, the last edition of the two to the

0:01:11.040 --> 0:01:13.280
<v Speaker 1>to the Deuce Tray.

0:01:13.959 --> 0:01:16.240
<v Speaker 2>Oh, is this our final of the year?

0:01:16.680 --> 0:01:19.080
<v Speaker 1>It is. It's the last one of twenty twenty three, Chuck.

0:01:19.120 --> 0:01:22.759
<v Speaker 1>We recorded all of the episodes that we're ever going

0:01:22.760 --> 0:01:25.480
<v Speaker 1>to record in the year twenty twenty three. Isn't that amazing?

0:01:25.720 --> 0:01:27.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? And hey, you know, since you brought that up,

0:01:27.680 --> 0:01:28.400
<v Speaker 2>can I say something?

0:01:29.360 --> 0:01:29.640
<v Speaker 1>Sure?

0:01:30.880 --> 0:01:34.840
<v Speaker 2>Spotify, who carries our show, as do all platforms, they

0:01:34.840 --> 0:01:37.480
<v Speaker 2>have this really cool thing they send out called the

0:01:37.640 --> 0:01:41.679
<v Speaker 2>wrap Wrap I guess is in year end wrap up

0:01:41.760 --> 0:01:46.080
<v Speaker 2>kind of thing, and they they sent us as a

0:01:46.160 --> 0:01:50.680
<v Speaker 2>show our own statistical analysis, but then they send individual

0:01:50.800 --> 0:01:53.560
<v Speaker 2>users their own and we just had a lot of

0:01:53.600 --> 0:01:57.720
<v Speaker 2>great listeners sending us in their rap statistics like hey,

0:01:57.760 --> 0:02:00.400
<v Speaker 2>I'm in the top one percent of stuff you should

0:02:00.400 --> 0:02:03.400
<v Speaker 2>know listenership, And it was just really neat to see

0:02:03.400 --> 0:02:05.160
<v Speaker 2>all that stuff coming in, So thank you.

0:02:05.560 --> 0:02:08.079
<v Speaker 1>It really is. It's amazing and everybody's so proud of it.

0:02:08.080 --> 0:02:10.600
<v Speaker 1>It's so great to see. So no matter what percentage

0:02:10.600 --> 0:02:12.560
<v Speaker 1>you're in, if you are proud enough to send an

0:02:12.560 --> 0:02:16.280
<v Speaker 1>email or post it, kudos to you, because we're proud

0:02:16.280 --> 0:02:18.920
<v Speaker 1>of you right back. I do think, though, Chuck, that

0:02:18.960 --> 0:02:22.560
<v Speaker 1>we probably should shout out the person who wrote in

0:02:22.639 --> 0:02:27.320
<v Speaker 1>with the far and away the largest number of listening

0:02:27.360 --> 0:02:28.680
<v Speaker 1>minutes according to Spotify.

0:02:28.880 --> 0:02:30.359
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, who's that?

0:02:30.360 --> 0:02:34.799
<v Speaker 1>That is Aravin Cancerla, who is in the top point

0:02:35.000 --> 0:02:39.959
<v Speaker 1>zero five percent of listeners and based on the eighty

0:02:40.280 --> 0:02:43.880
<v Speaker 1>thousand plus eighty six, seven hundred and seventy two minutes,

0:02:44.360 --> 0:02:47.799
<v Speaker 1>I don't see how there could be anybody else in that,

0:02:48.800 --> 0:02:54.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, in the remaining what point zero's five percent left?

0:02:55.080 --> 0:02:57.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I did a little back of the envelope math

0:02:57.639 --> 0:03:01.519
<v Speaker 2>and that that's something somewhere between twenty five and thirty

0:03:01.560 --> 0:03:03.000
<v Speaker 2>hours of stuff you should know a week.

0:03:03.680 --> 0:03:05.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that just it's a lot.

0:03:05.480 --> 0:03:09.160
<v Speaker 2>Doesn't seem possible. So I have suspicions that this person

0:03:09.240 --> 0:03:11.000
<v Speaker 2>might have just played it on a loop so they could,

0:03:11.960 --> 0:03:13.760
<v Speaker 2>you know, and then just went out shopping or whatever.

0:03:14.400 --> 0:03:17.639
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I think Aravin strikes me as a

0:03:18.400 --> 0:03:22.960
<v Speaker 1>pretty straightforward person. So grats to Airvind and also seriously,

0:03:23.000 --> 0:03:25.240
<v Speaker 1>thank you to everybody who listens to us so much

0:03:25.280 --> 0:03:27.720
<v Speaker 1>that you get statistics at the end of the year

0:03:27.760 --> 0:03:30.239
<v Speaker 1>that make you proud. I mean, that's amazing, guys. Thank

0:03:30.280 --> 0:03:30.880
<v Speaker 1>you very much.

0:03:31.000 --> 0:03:33.799
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, thanks to Spotify. That's a cool service that they

0:03:34.120 --> 0:03:35.840
<v Speaker 2>or I don't know if is that a service, whatevers

0:03:35.880 --> 0:03:36.520
<v Speaker 2>cool thing they do.

0:03:38.040 --> 0:03:39.720
<v Speaker 1>It's a service, it's a public service.

0:03:39.840 --> 0:03:42.480
<v Speaker 2>We were downloaded in one hundred and sixty three countries.

0:03:43.080 --> 0:03:45.720
<v Speaker 1>Oh, I didn't know there were that many countries.

0:03:45.360 --> 0:03:47.600
<v Speaker 2>Which is we looked it up. It was actually something

0:03:47.640 --> 0:03:49.720
<v Speaker 2>like one hundred and ninety. So like that's most of

0:03:49.800 --> 0:03:50.280
<v Speaker 2>the countries.

0:03:50.840 --> 0:03:53.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I would say that's the vast majority of them.

0:03:53.240 --> 0:03:54.960
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, everybody I knew that there were

0:03:55.040 --> 0:03:56.200
<v Speaker 1>more countries than that.

0:03:56.280 --> 0:03:59.480
<v Speaker 2>I was joking and quickly I saw that. I don't

0:03:59.480 --> 0:04:01.920
<v Speaker 2>know if you went through that yet, Josh, but we

0:04:02.480 --> 0:04:06.480
<v Speaker 2>our third biggest country of growth was Mexico. Oh, no way,

0:04:06.600 --> 0:04:12.960
<v Speaker 2>And I'm gaming. I'm gaming. I'm aiming for a show

0:04:12.960 --> 0:04:14.440
<v Speaker 2>in Mexico City. I'd like to do that. We just

0:04:14.520 --> 0:04:17.240
<v Speaker 2>don't know if like people would come. So, you know,

0:04:17.279 --> 0:04:18.720
<v Speaker 2>if we can get like a thousand people in a

0:04:18.800 --> 0:04:21.240
<v Speaker 2>room in Mexico City, I think that might be a

0:04:21.279 --> 0:04:21.920
<v Speaker 2>fun thing to do.

0:04:22.720 --> 0:04:25.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, especially if it's a room with seats.

0:04:25.320 --> 0:04:28.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so we should get at least five hundred emails

0:04:28.720 --> 0:04:30.719
<v Speaker 2>saying at least two people will come and then that

0:04:30.800 --> 0:04:34.960
<v Speaker 2>means we might go all right, So anyway, should we

0:04:34.960 --> 0:04:37.159
<v Speaker 2>get on with barbaric practices?

0:04:38.920 --> 0:04:42.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, let's because I find this endlessly fascinating. Olivia helped

0:04:42.960 --> 0:04:46.160
<v Speaker 1>us with this, and basically what we're doing here is

0:04:46.920 --> 0:04:50.880
<v Speaker 1>reversing what we already kind of like to do smugly,

0:04:50.920 --> 0:04:54.000
<v Speaker 1>which is look back fifty one hundred, two hundred years

0:04:54.279 --> 0:04:56.800
<v Speaker 1>and be like, look at how backwards and antiquated those

0:04:56.800 --> 0:05:00.440
<v Speaker 1>people were back then, Like even in as recent is

0:05:00.520 --> 0:05:03.680
<v Speaker 1>the nineties. I remember in the mid nineties, I was

0:05:03.920 --> 0:05:07.279
<v Speaker 1>I smoked on an airplane on the way to Amsterdam. Yeah,

0:05:07.600 --> 0:05:10.559
<v Speaker 1>and like there was it was just like the last

0:05:10.560 --> 0:05:12.800
<v Speaker 1>three rows were smoking. But it's not like it was

0:05:12.800 --> 0:05:15.120
<v Speaker 1>sectioned off. There wasn't even a curtain. It's just like

0:05:15.200 --> 0:05:18.080
<v Speaker 1>this is the smoking section, even though the entire plane's

0:05:18.120 --> 0:05:22.040
<v Speaker 1>being covered in your cigarette smoke. This was the nineties, man.

0:05:22.680 --> 0:05:24.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, the first time I flew to Europe there was

0:05:24.839 --> 0:05:29.080
<v Speaker 2>smoking in like that was it would have been ninety six.

0:05:29.960 --> 0:05:32.839
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean imagine that today. I mean you would

0:05:32.880 --> 0:05:35.160
<v Speaker 1>literally go to federal prison if you tried to light

0:05:35.200 --> 0:05:39.680
<v Speaker 1>a cigarette on an airplane today.

0:05:38.760 --> 0:05:42.240
<v Speaker 3>You know, Yeah, I mean it's about the fire, but sure, yeah,

0:05:42.279 --> 0:05:47.039
<v Speaker 3>a few decades before that there was jello salad where

0:05:47.040 --> 0:05:50.080
<v Speaker 3>it was all the rage and like the weirdest jello salad.

0:05:50.120 --> 0:05:52.200
<v Speaker 1>If you've never just kind of taken a stroll down

0:05:52.400 --> 0:05:55.839
<v Speaker 1>memory lane and looked up like pictures of jello molds

0:05:55.920 --> 0:05:59.160
<v Speaker 1>from the fifties to the seventies, yeah, treat yourself and

0:05:59.200 --> 0:06:01.560
<v Speaker 1>go do that. But make sure you have not had

0:06:01.640 --> 0:06:03.800
<v Speaker 1>lunch yet, because you're gonna want to gag when you

0:06:03.800 --> 0:06:05.720
<v Speaker 1>see a lot of them. That's another fun thing to

0:06:05.800 --> 0:06:08.640
<v Speaker 1>judge people for being stupid with cello because I don't

0:06:08.640 --> 0:06:09.920
<v Speaker 1>know if we said it yet. We're going to do

0:06:09.960 --> 0:06:11.800
<v Speaker 1>the opposite. We're going to look forward and try to

0:06:11.800 --> 0:06:15.400
<v Speaker 1>figure out what our descendants are going to ridicule us

0:06:15.560 --> 0:06:18.840
<v Speaker 1>or look down at us about, right, what will we

0:06:18.920 --> 0:06:22.000
<v Speaker 1>seem primitive or barbaric or ridiculous about?

0:06:22.279 --> 0:06:26.840
<v Speaker 2>That's right? But what we have before us are seven.

0:06:27.080 --> 0:06:30.080
<v Speaker 2>I think a little more serious things than jello molds

0:06:31.320 --> 0:06:35.480
<v Speaker 2>and spanking kids is on up there. However, it really

0:06:35.520 --> 0:06:41.320
<v Speaker 2>depends on who you ask, because about half of Americans

0:06:41.600 --> 0:06:44.200
<v Speaker 2>still think and this is a quote, and this from

0:06:44.240 --> 0:06:46.200
<v Speaker 2>a survey a couple of years ago from the American

0:06:46.240 --> 0:06:50.640
<v Speaker 2>Family Survey quote, it is sometimes necessary to discipline a

0:06:50.720 --> 0:06:55.320
<v Speaker 2>child with a good, hard spanking, and half.

0:06:55.080 --> 0:06:58.960
<v Speaker 1>Of those respondents said almost under their breath feels so right.

0:07:00.600 --> 0:07:03.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, big change from you know, back in

0:07:03.440 --> 0:07:05.920
<v Speaker 2>the day. They have another stat from sixty eight when

0:07:06.000 --> 0:07:09.840
<v Speaker 2>ninety four percent of parents said, yeah, hit your kids,

0:07:10.160 --> 0:07:10.680
<v Speaker 2>it's awesome.

0:07:10.720 --> 0:07:12.000
<v Speaker 1>You drop. That's a big drop.

0:07:12.680 --> 0:07:15.480
<v Speaker 2>But things are really changing because a third of the

0:07:15.920 --> 0:07:21.160
<v Speaker 2>respondents between eighteen and twenty nine agree with spanking, compared

0:07:21.200 --> 0:07:24.679
<v Speaker 2>to fifty percent of the overall survey. So it's something

0:07:24.720 --> 0:07:26.760
<v Speaker 2>that's going out of fashion for sure.

0:07:27.240 --> 0:07:30.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it seems to be following a larger trend of

0:07:30.800 --> 0:07:34.960
<v Speaker 1>moving away from social acceptance of violence in any form,

0:07:35.440 --> 0:07:39.400
<v Speaker 1>and it's being supported by studies that find like, yeah,

0:07:39.440 --> 0:07:41.840
<v Speaker 1>it's actually good if you don't spank your kids, because

0:07:42.240 --> 0:07:45.760
<v Speaker 1>not only has there never been a study that shows

0:07:45.800 --> 0:07:50.720
<v Speaker 1>it improves children's behavior, study after study keeps suggesting it

0:07:50.760 --> 0:07:54.840
<v Speaker 1>does the opposite. It actually maladjusts children. I mean, I

0:07:54.840 --> 0:07:57.320
<v Speaker 1>can't imagine what a well adjusted person I would be

0:07:57.360 --> 0:07:59.320
<v Speaker 1>if I hadn't been spanked that handful of times when

0:07:59.360 --> 0:07:59.960
<v Speaker 1>I was a kid.

0:08:00.760 --> 0:08:03.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you know, I was. We're always trying to poke

0:08:03.680 --> 0:08:06.760
<v Speaker 2>around to find, you know, the other opinion on something,

0:08:06.800 --> 0:08:09.120
<v Speaker 2>just to take a look at it, and you know

0:08:09.120 --> 0:08:11.520
<v Speaker 2>there are people who don't agree. I saw this one

0:08:11.560 --> 0:08:17.840
<v Speaker 2>professor from the Oklahoma State Robert Larzelli. I can't even

0:08:18.320 --> 0:08:21.480
<v Speaker 2>read my handwriting now, but he said that the studies

0:08:21.520 --> 0:08:25.240
<v Speaker 2>that are out there are flawed for a couple of reasons. One,

0:08:25.280 --> 0:08:28.120
<v Speaker 2>he says, these studies that say that if you spank

0:08:28.200 --> 0:08:31.360
<v Speaker 2>kids more, there that leads to them actually acting out more.

0:08:31.760 --> 0:08:34.319
<v Speaker 2>He's saying, no, kids, it's the kids that are acting

0:08:34.360 --> 0:08:36.880
<v Speaker 2>out more that are it's a chicken in the egg thing. Yes,

0:08:36.960 --> 0:08:38.800
<v Speaker 2>I've seen the ones getting spanked more.

0:08:39.080 --> 0:08:43.040
<v Speaker 1>I've seen that, and I think I found in a

0:08:43.080 --> 0:08:46.600
<v Speaker 1>Scientific American article there was at least one group that

0:08:46.720 --> 0:08:51.280
<v Speaker 1>managed to control for that and basically have shown like, no,

0:08:51.320 --> 0:08:55.440
<v Speaker 1>it's it's it actually does have this effect on kids.

0:08:55.600 --> 0:08:58.160
<v Speaker 1>The problem that what'd you say, Lara Zelli?

0:08:59.280 --> 0:09:03.360
<v Speaker 2>I think so if my writing is any indicator.

0:09:03.360 --> 0:09:06.839
<v Speaker 1>That what Larazzelli's saying is that these studies don't they

0:09:06.840 --> 0:09:12.320
<v Speaker 1>don't start following kids and from like birth to twenty

0:09:12.360 --> 0:09:15.680
<v Speaker 1>five or thirty and then see you know where you spanked,

0:09:15.679 --> 0:09:17.800
<v Speaker 1>where you're not spanked it's all just like they might.

0:09:17.960 --> 0:09:20.760
<v Speaker 1>They might peek in on a kid who's in at

0:09:20.800 --> 0:09:24.200
<v Speaker 1>the spanking age and look at their behavior. Then you

0:09:24.280 --> 0:09:26.520
<v Speaker 1>just can't parse it apart. So there's not really good

0:09:26.640 --> 0:09:30.439
<v Speaker 1>quality studies. But I saw it put like this. Even

0:09:30.600 --> 0:09:37.880
<v Speaker 1>if there are no studies that conclusively show spanking is

0:09:38.160 --> 0:09:43.600
<v Speaker 1>bad for kids or produces malajusted behavior in kids, there

0:09:43.960 --> 0:09:47.080
<v Speaker 1>are plenty of studies that seem to suggest that. There

0:09:47.080 --> 0:09:50.800
<v Speaker 1>aren't any studies that seem to suggest otherwise that it's

0:09:51.040 --> 0:09:55.280
<v Speaker 1>it's actually good, it's actually it's effective to spank your kids.

0:09:55.480 --> 0:09:57.840
<v Speaker 1>And so the argument that I've seen is like, why

0:09:58.080 --> 0:09:59.000
<v Speaker 1>why do it? Then?

0:10:00.080 --> 0:10:02.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I saw a First of all, I'm a parent.

0:10:03.840 --> 0:10:07.480
<v Speaker 2>I can't in a million years imagine hitting Ruby for

0:10:07.520 --> 0:10:11.160
<v Speaker 2>any reason that's nice. It makes me want to cry

0:10:11.320 --> 0:10:16.960
<v Speaker 2>just thinking about that. It's terrible for our family. But

0:10:17.240 --> 0:10:19.360
<v Speaker 2>I did find a study from twenty eighteen that I

0:10:19.440 --> 0:10:23.319
<v Speaker 2>found in from NPR. They didn't do the study, but

0:10:23.360 --> 0:10:25.160
<v Speaker 2>they were, you know, did a thing on it.

0:10:25.600 --> 0:10:26.839
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure they were hot and heavy.

0:10:27.120 --> 0:10:31.480
<v Speaker 2>Oh of course it was what they claim. And it

0:10:31.480 --> 0:10:33.680
<v Speaker 2>seems like probably one of the most robust studies at

0:10:33.760 --> 0:10:37.400
<v Speaker 2>least that looks at countries that have banned spanking, because

0:10:38.640 --> 0:10:44.199
<v Speaker 2>I think something like sixty two countries have banned spanking

0:10:44.720 --> 0:10:46.800
<v Speaker 2>starting with Sweden in nineteen seventy nine.

0:10:47.240 --> 0:10:49.000
<v Speaker 1>Did you even know there were that many countries?

0:10:51.440 --> 0:10:55.360
<v Speaker 2>But they followed four or they used four hundred thousand

0:10:55.440 --> 0:10:59.240
<v Speaker 2>children from kids from eighty eight countries, so that's pretty good.

0:11:00.080 --> 0:11:02.439
<v Speaker 2>Fifty eight countries have the bands in thirty don't. I'm

0:11:02.480 --> 0:11:04.959
<v Speaker 2>not sure which one it is. But what they found

0:11:04.960 --> 0:11:08.240
<v Speaker 2>when what they were tracking was incidences of kids fighting,

0:11:08.679 --> 0:11:11.360
<v Speaker 2>like you know, getting in fights at school, right and

0:11:11.440 --> 0:11:16.240
<v Speaker 2>in the countries that have banned spanking, there was a

0:11:16.280 --> 0:11:22.640
<v Speaker 2>school fighting reduction by sixty nine percent in boys in girls,

0:11:22.880 --> 0:11:27.480
<v Speaker 2>which is I mean, that is pretty substantial. I was

0:11:27.480 --> 0:11:29.760
<v Speaker 2>curious about the United States because you know, we both

0:11:29.760 --> 0:11:32.880
<v Speaker 2>grew up, like my dad was my elementary school principal,

0:11:32.920 --> 0:11:35.680
<v Speaker 2>and they were he spanked me and other kids. It's

0:11:36.040 --> 0:11:39.920
<v Speaker 2>ridiculous to think about, but apparently in seventy seven the

0:11:39.960 --> 0:11:42.160
<v Speaker 2>Supreme Court of the United States gave the power to

0:11:42.160 --> 0:11:47.240
<v Speaker 2>the states. These days, ninety percent of schools don't use

0:11:47.320 --> 0:11:51.480
<v Speaker 2>corporal punishment, but it is still legal in seventeen states.

0:11:51.920 --> 0:11:54.000
<v Speaker 2>There are restrictions in place in a lot of those

0:11:54.480 --> 0:11:56.680
<v Speaker 2>like maybe your parents have to sign a thing. I said, sure,

0:11:57.080 --> 0:12:01.960
<v Speaker 2>hit my kid. But seventeen percent of states you can

0:12:02.080 --> 0:12:06.360
<v Speaker 2>still do this, with Mississippi leading the way in the

0:12:06.400 --> 0:12:09.160
<v Speaker 2>most spankings. And the other thing I found out that

0:12:09.200 --> 0:12:13.920
<v Speaker 2>we should point out is that black males are twice

0:12:13.920 --> 0:12:18.720
<v Speaker 2>as likely to be spanked than anyone. And get this,

0:12:19.040 --> 0:12:24.320
<v Speaker 2>sixteen point five percent of kids that are corporately punished

0:12:24.320 --> 0:12:30.199
<v Speaker 2>in schools in America today are disabled. My god, usually

0:12:30.240 --> 0:12:35.079
<v Speaker 2>it's an intellectual disability. Wow. Is that so not disturbing?

0:12:35.400 --> 0:12:38.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, of course it's disturbing. That's horrible. That's one of

0:12:38.440 --> 0:12:41.959
<v Speaker 1>the most horrible statistics you've ever spouted out. And I

0:12:41.960 --> 0:12:45.160
<v Speaker 1>should say, also just want to verify for the listeners

0:12:45.200 --> 0:12:48.240
<v Speaker 1>in any of those sixty two countries where spanking is banned,

0:12:48.559 --> 0:12:52.520
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about like public spanking, like in school in

0:12:52.600 --> 0:12:55.240
<v Speaker 1>seventeen states. In schools, you're allowed to do that.

0:12:55.280 --> 0:13:00.640
<v Speaker 2>Right, Yes, a teacher or a principal and they say

0:13:00.679 --> 0:13:01.959
<v Speaker 2>it's you know. And this is one of the other

0:13:02.040 --> 0:13:05.560
<v Speaker 2>problems that that professor had is that those studies, he says,

0:13:05.640 --> 0:13:09.640
<v Speaker 2>lump everyone in together as in, like the parents who

0:13:09.679 --> 0:13:12.120
<v Speaker 2>do it as the very last resort after several other

0:13:12.600 --> 0:13:15.520
<v Speaker 2>attempts at discipline or parents are just like, oh, you

0:13:15.600 --> 0:13:19.520
<v Speaker 2>screwed up, you know, let's hit you or whatever. And

0:13:19.600 --> 0:13:22.720
<v Speaker 2>apparently most, you know, almost all the schools, it is

0:13:22.760 --> 0:13:26.080
<v Speaker 2>a last resort, as in they've tried other things, but

0:13:26.280 --> 0:13:29.440
<v Speaker 2>you know, it's just I don't know, I got to

0:13:29.440 --> 0:13:32.680
<v Speaker 2>try not to judge people, but don't hit your kids.

0:13:32.960 --> 0:13:35.520
<v Speaker 1>Well, I was gonna say, it's it's legal in seventeen

0:13:35.559 --> 0:13:39.360
<v Speaker 1>states for schools to spank kids. It's legal in all

0:13:39.400 --> 0:13:43.800
<v Speaker 1>fifty states for a parent to spank kids. That's there's

0:13:44.120 --> 0:13:46.640
<v Speaker 1>not really anything coming down the horizon that makes it

0:13:46.640 --> 0:13:49.280
<v Speaker 1>seem like that's ever going to be banned. But it

0:13:49.320 --> 0:13:53.120
<v Speaker 1>does seem generationally like we're moving away from spanking pretty rapidly.

0:13:53.559 --> 0:13:59.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, my spankings as a kid, we're very infrequent and

0:13:59.160 --> 0:14:01.720
<v Speaker 2>very organized, as in it was never done in the

0:14:01.720 --> 0:14:04.960
<v Speaker 2>heat of anger, like just getting slapped or something. It

0:14:05.080 --> 0:14:09.320
<v Speaker 2>was like, all right, go to the bathroom and spend

0:14:09.360 --> 0:14:13.120
<v Speaker 2>ten minutes, you know, upset and card and then I

0:14:13.160 --> 0:14:15.440
<v Speaker 2>got spanked with a bolo paddle. You know, the little

0:14:15.480 --> 0:14:16.559
<v Speaker 2>bolo paddle games.

0:14:16.760 --> 0:14:18.000
<v Speaker 1>I know, the bolo tie.

0:14:18.200 --> 0:14:20.680
<v Speaker 2>No, the bolo paddle where you a little light plywood

0:14:20.680 --> 0:14:23.880
<v Speaker 2>paddle with a ball hard. Yeah, sure, that's that was

0:14:23.920 --> 0:14:25.200
<v Speaker 2>the spanking device.

0:14:25.240 --> 0:14:27.520
<v Speaker 1>In mind, those things are made of like balsa wood.

0:14:28.240 --> 0:14:29.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it wasn't you bad. It's stung.

0:14:29.920 --> 0:14:33.040
<v Speaker 1>But you know, how about all of your spankings that

0:14:33.080 --> 0:14:34.280
<v Speaker 1>had grown.

0:14:34.120 --> 0:14:36.680
<v Speaker 2>Up that's usually involves leather.

0:14:37.240 --> 0:14:41.040
<v Speaker 1>Okay, you you want to move on to the next one.

0:14:41.240 --> 0:14:43.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, let's let's move on to chemotherapy.

0:14:43.360 --> 0:14:47.720
<v Speaker 1>Okay. So chemotherapy is one of these things where, if

0:14:47.760 --> 0:14:50.200
<v Speaker 1>you start kind of putting it down today, what you're

0:14:50.240 --> 0:14:55.200
<v Speaker 1>talking about is our current modern medical miracle that since

0:14:55.240 --> 0:14:58.280
<v Speaker 1>the nineties has reduced the cancer death rate by twenty

0:14:58.320 --> 0:15:01.520
<v Speaker 1>five percent. Yeah, it's it's a really big deal that

0:15:01.560 --> 0:15:05.040
<v Speaker 1>we have chemotherapy now, it's saved a lot of lives.

0:15:05.400 --> 0:15:07.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, this is not poopoo in chemotherapy.

0:15:07.400 --> 0:15:12.080
<v Speaker 1>No, it's not the reason why we can probably guess

0:15:12.240 --> 0:15:16.440
<v Speaker 1>that our descendants down the line are going to look

0:15:16.440 --> 0:15:20.080
<v Speaker 1>at chemotherapy is fairly primitive and barbaric is because it's

0:15:20.160 --> 0:15:24.320
<v Speaker 1>so indiscriminate in how it harms the body. It harms

0:15:24.360 --> 0:15:29.160
<v Speaker 1>the whole body in order to kill the cancer cells. Right,

0:15:30.040 --> 0:15:33.240
<v Speaker 1>and we're moving it seems like much more toward far,

0:15:33.360 --> 0:15:37.520
<v Speaker 1>far more specific and tailored medicine, and so all of

0:15:37.520 --> 0:15:40.560
<v Speaker 1>the side effects, in the horribleness that come with chemotherapy,

0:15:40.560 --> 0:15:44.560
<v Speaker 1>even though it does save lives, will be going away

0:15:44.720 --> 0:15:45.760
<v Speaker 1>in future decades.

0:15:45.800 --> 0:15:48.320
<v Speaker 2>It looks like, yeah, and it seems like and we're

0:15:48.320 --> 0:15:50.280
<v Speaker 2>going to talk about a few ways that things are

0:15:50.280 --> 0:15:54.320
<v Speaker 2>becoming more specific, but that seems to be the way

0:15:54.320 --> 0:15:57.160
<v Speaker 2>it's all trying to go is instead of just like

0:15:57.600 --> 0:16:00.080
<v Speaker 2>killing all the cells, let's see if they can just

0:16:00.160 --> 0:16:04.640
<v Speaker 2>specifically target cancer cells and then eventually, you know, get

0:16:04.680 --> 0:16:08.520
<v Speaker 2>down to you know, the human specific targeting of things,

0:16:08.560 --> 0:16:12.600
<v Speaker 2>which would be amazing obviously, yeah, you know, patient specific, right.

0:16:12.880 --> 0:16:16.480
<v Speaker 2>But one of the first ones is antibody drug conjugates,

0:16:17.120 --> 0:16:21.800
<v Speaker 2>and this is a type of chemotherapy, but it combines chemotherapy,

0:16:21.920 --> 0:16:25.960
<v Speaker 2>like the drugs used in chemotherapy, with monoclonal antibodies, which

0:16:25.960 --> 0:16:29.040
<v Speaker 2>are you know, lab just like antibodies that we have

0:16:29.080 --> 0:16:31.040
<v Speaker 2>in our body, except they're created in a lab.

0:16:31.440 --> 0:16:35.880
<v Speaker 1>Right, And so what happens is we inject these drugs,

0:16:35.920 --> 0:16:40.160
<v Speaker 1>these antibody drug conjugates into a patient with cancer, and

0:16:40.880 --> 0:16:45.280
<v Speaker 1>those antibodies are designed to go seek out that tumor

0:16:45.600 --> 0:16:48.800
<v Speaker 1>the specific kind of tumor that that patient has, Yeah,

0:16:49.200 --> 0:16:52.240
<v Speaker 1>and attached to that tumor, that cancer sell and it

0:16:52.880 --> 0:16:56.840
<v Speaker 1>delivers that payload of chemo drugs to it, says here

0:16:56.840 --> 0:16:58.840
<v Speaker 1>you go, here's a nice little present, and then turns

0:16:58.880 --> 0:17:01.720
<v Speaker 1>around and runs, and then in the background, the cell

0:17:01.800 --> 0:17:05.280
<v Speaker 1>explodes and the antibody like ends up on its chest

0:17:05.359 --> 0:17:06.720
<v Speaker 1>but lives to fight another day.

0:17:07.320 --> 0:17:12.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, exactly. That's if we're headed in that direction. That's fantastic. Yeah.

0:17:12.640 --> 0:17:17.040
<v Speaker 2>Vaccines is another one, the mr NA vaccines that we

0:17:17.119 --> 0:17:20.920
<v Speaker 2>detailed back when those came out for COVID. Two of

0:17:20.960 --> 0:17:25.080
<v Speaker 2>the most successful versions of those vaccines were originally brought

0:17:25.080 --> 0:17:29.480
<v Speaker 2>about to begin with as tumor vaccines, and the idea

0:17:29.520 --> 0:17:32.399
<v Speaker 2>is to use sort of that same technology to just

0:17:32.600 --> 0:17:38.160
<v Speaker 2>specifically target tumors themselves. So it's not like a vaccine

0:17:38.200 --> 0:17:41.680
<v Speaker 2>to prevent a disease. It's a shot that will essentially

0:17:41.720 --> 0:17:43.119
<v Speaker 2>specifically shrink a tumor.

0:17:43.520 --> 0:17:46.439
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, just like the mRNA vaccines for COVID train the

0:17:46.480 --> 0:17:51.040
<v Speaker 1>body to look for and respond to COVID viruses, saying like, hey,

0:17:51.280 --> 0:17:53.800
<v Speaker 1>if you see anything with this little horn on it,

0:17:53.840 --> 0:17:56.520
<v Speaker 1>the spike, go after it. They're doing the same thing

0:17:56.520 --> 0:17:59.280
<v Speaker 1>with tumors, right, So that's boosting the immune response. It's

0:17:59.280 --> 0:18:02.520
<v Speaker 1>also training immune response. So technically it does qualify as

0:18:02.520 --> 0:18:05.040
<v Speaker 1>a vaccine. And because like we talked about in the

0:18:05.040 --> 0:18:11.359
<v Speaker 1>COVID vaccine episode, this mRNA technology is just so you

0:18:11.359 --> 0:18:15.359
<v Speaker 1>can just it's just like ready to wear vaccines basically.

0:18:15.680 --> 0:18:16.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:18:16.359 --> 0:18:21.440
<v Speaker 1>Apparently, yeah, apparently they they have reached a turning point

0:18:22.080 --> 0:18:24.399
<v Speaker 1>and in the next five years a lot of cancer

0:18:24.440 --> 0:18:26.640
<v Speaker 1>researchers are saying We're going to see a lot more

0:18:26.680 --> 0:18:29.240
<v Speaker 1>cancer vaccines coming down the pike.

0:18:30.000 --> 0:18:34.240
<v Speaker 2>Amazing. And then what I talked about earlier, like making

0:18:34.840 --> 0:18:37.719
<v Speaker 2>like targeting cancer cell specifically is like a great direction

0:18:37.760 --> 0:18:42.520
<v Speaker 2>to go, but really getting into personalized cancer care will

0:18:42.560 --> 0:18:46.199
<v Speaker 2>be the next step beyond that, Like, hey, I'm going

0:18:46.240 --> 0:18:50.600
<v Speaker 2>to identify exactly what kind of tumor that you have

0:18:50.720 --> 0:18:53.199
<v Speaker 2>in your body and not just maybe this kind of

0:18:53.240 --> 0:18:58.000
<v Speaker 2>tumor and you know, treat like get to patient specific

0:18:58.520 --> 0:19:01.520
<v Speaker 2>levels of treatment. And you know, I know we poo

0:19:01.560 --> 0:19:04.960
<v Speaker 2>pooed AI in certain respects, but this is a place

0:19:05.000 --> 0:19:07.000
<v Speaker 2>where AI can really probably do a lot of good.

0:19:07.359 --> 0:19:09.679
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think we should just clarify or position on

0:19:09.760 --> 0:19:11.680
<v Speaker 1>it if I can speak for both of us. Sure,

0:19:11.760 --> 0:19:14.679
<v Speaker 1>as long as AI is not taking over the world

0:19:15.480 --> 0:19:19.800
<v Speaker 1>or damaging humanity in some terrible way. I'm all for

0:19:20.080 --> 0:19:22.159
<v Speaker 1>all the great ways that can help things, and this

0:19:22.200 --> 0:19:24.000
<v Speaker 1>is a really sterling example of that.

0:19:24.359 --> 0:19:25.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it gave us a new Beatles song.

0:19:26.920 --> 0:19:29.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I would say that's right in the middle for me.

0:19:31.000 --> 0:19:33.480
<v Speaker 1>But the I think what you were talking about was

0:19:34.320 --> 0:19:39.280
<v Speaker 1>taking a sample of the specific tumor that a specific

0:19:39.400 --> 0:19:43.960
<v Speaker 1>person has, analyzing its genetic makeup, and then looking at

0:19:43.960 --> 0:19:46.679
<v Speaker 1>that genetic makeup thanks to AI spitting out all of

0:19:46.680 --> 0:19:50.560
<v Speaker 1>the information that we need from analyzing that huge genome,

0:19:51.640 --> 0:19:54.440
<v Speaker 1>saying oh, this is an achilles heel, this is another weakness,

0:19:54.440 --> 0:19:56.360
<v Speaker 1>this is another way we can attack it, and then

0:19:56.680 --> 0:20:00.679
<v Speaker 1>tailoring the treatment for that specific tumor like that tumor,

0:20:00.800 --> 0:20:03.800
<v Speaker 1>Like you said, now that kind of tumor that tumor

0:20:04.160 --> 0:20:06.760
<v Speaker 1>is getting at tech. It's so specific you could name

0:20:06.800 --> 0:20:10.360
<v Speaker 1>the tumor, name the tumor Melvin. Melvin is toast when

0:20:10.400 --> 0:20:14.320
<v Speaker 1>you're using precision or personal cancer treatments.

0:20:14.760 --> 0:20:18.679
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you know, this kind of stuff could even be possible. Now,

0:20:18.720 --> 0:20:22.640
<v Speaker 2>it's just really really expensive to target a specific tumor

0:20:22.640 --> 0:20:26.080
<v Speaker 2>for a specific human And so the idea is hopefully

0:20:26.080 --> 0:20:28.760
<v Speaker 2>with the help of AI, they can just reduce a

0:20:28.800 --> 0:20:31.879
<v Speaker 2>lot of the you know, the cost basically for doing that,

0:20:32.000 --> 0:20:35.119
<v Speaker 2>So it becomes instead of something that's not even you know,

0:20:35.800 --> 0:20:38.879
<v Speaker 2>not even something worth pursuing or able to be pursued

0:20:38.880 --> 0:20:42.680
<v Speaker 2>because of finances, something' is like, oh yeah, just step

0:20:42.760 --> 0:20:44.960
<v Speaker 2>right up and we'll spit out your treatment.

0:20:45.280 --> 0:20:47.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. And as more more does the cost come down,

0:20:47.520 --> 0:20:49.680
<v Speaker 1>more people use it, which means more people using it

0:20:49.960 --> 0:20:54.720
<v Speaker 1>allows for greater chance of new breakthrough. So yeah, hopefully

0:20:54.720 --> 0:20:57.439
<v Speaker 1>we're going to have cancer licked in the future. I

0:20:57.480 --> 0:21:00.719
<v Speaker 1>saw somebody suggest that it'll end up being kind of

0:21:00.720 --> 0:21:03.360
<v Speaker 1>like a chronic disease akin to diabetes in the.

0:21:03.320 --> 0:21:06.760
<v Speaker 2>Future, just something you can live fairly healthily with.

0:21:07.000 --> 0:21:09.639
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you can manage and there'll be plenty of drugs

0:21:09.680 --> 0:21:14.439
<v Speaker 1>to keep you going amazing. You want to take a break, Yeah, okay,

0:21:14.560 --> 0:21:15.600
<v Speaker 1>well then let's do that.

0:21:36.960 --> 0:21:39.439
<v Speaker 2>All right. Next up on the list of things that

0:21:39.480 --> 0:21:41.720
<v Speaker 2>people may one day look back and say, why did

0:21:41.720 --> 0:21:44.480
<v Speaker 2>you do it that way? Dummies of the twenty first

0:21:44.520 --> 0:21:49.720
<v Speaker 2>century is organ transplants. We have a pretty great episode

0:21:49.720 --> 0:21:53.280
<v Speaker 2>on organ transplants somewhere in our back catalog. It feels

0:21:53.320 --> 0:21:55.240
<v Speaker 2>like a long time ago. It was a little while,

0:21:56.119 --> 0:21:59.560
<v Speaker 2>but what we're basically talking about, and again, organ transplants awesome.

0:22:00.000 --> 0:22:03.840
<v Speaker 2>It's amazing how far they've come in the past, you know,

0:22:03.880 --> 0:22:07.480
<v Speaker 2>since they've been doing them. But rejection rates are still

0:22:07.520 --> 0:22:11.360
<v Speaker 2>an issue, up to ten to fifteen percent for kidneys

0:22:11.359 --> 0:22:14.399
<v Speaker 2>for instance. And then also the fact that you know,

0:22:14.600 --> 0:22:19.040
<v Speaker 2>transporting organs, getting them to the people in time can

0:22:19.119 --> 0:22:22.760
<v Speaker 2>still be an issue. Seventeen Americans die every day waiting

0:22:22.800 --> 0:22:26.840
<v Speaker 2>on organs. And it's also inequitable in that, you know,

0:22:27.200 --> 0:22:31.399
<v Speaker 2>generally people that have are the most funded, get the

0:22:31.440 --> 0:22:34.960
<v Speaker 2>most organs for transplant. But there's a better way forward, right.

0:22:35.080 --> 0:22:37.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I just want to say one I found a

0:22:37.119 --> 0:22:40.480
<v Speaker 1>stat that I found rather shocking. One in five donated

0:22:40.560 --> 0:22:44.040
<v Speaker 1>kidneys goes unused. It goes to waste, even though people

0:22:44.080 --> 0:22:48.120
<v Speaker 1>die waiting for kidneys. That's just how kluge the whole

0:22:48.160 --> 0:22:51.720
<v Speaker 1>setup is right now. Yeah, So, yeah, they're trying to

0:22:51.720 --> 0:22:54.879
<v Speaker 1>fix the process and the system and the organization in

0:22:54.960 --> 0:22:58.240
<v Speaker 1>charge of that in the United States, But like further

0:22:58.320 --> 0:23:03.600
<v Speaker 1>down the pike on a longer timeline, the goal is organagenesis,

0:23:04.200 --> 0:23:09.880
<v Speaker 1>which is what it sounds like. It's creating entirely new

0:23:10.000 --> 0:23:14.040
<v Speaker 1>organs from cells from scratch. It's like watch this grow.

0:23:14.240 --> 0:23:16.720
<v Speaker 1>You remember those little dinosaur sponges that you added water

0:23:16.800 --> 0:23:19.399
<v Speaker 1>to and they just grew, grew, grew. It's kind of

0:23:19.480 --> 0:23:22.520
<v Speaker 1>like that, but with fully functioning organs.

0:23:22.720 --> 0:23:26.159
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. How far are we away from someone trying to

0:23:26.560 --> 0:23:28.960
<v Speaker 2>grow a human out in a lab?

0:23:30.160 --> 0:23:32.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure somebody's probably trying it already, but I don't

0:23:32.760 --> 0:23:34.959
<v Speaker 1>know how long it'll be till they're successful.

0:23:35.600 --> 0:23:37.720
<v Speaker 2>I mean, we had Dolly the sheep, that Dolly was

0:23:37.720 --> 0:23:38.760
<v Speaker 2>a clone, right.

0:23:39.000 --> 0:23:42.880
<v Speaker 1>Yes, And I don't know if everybody's read our book,

0:23:42.920 --> 0:23:45.000
<v Speaker 1>and if you haven't, I'll just go ahead and share

0:23:45.040 --> 0:23:49.679
<v Speaker 1>with you a little fact from it. Yeah, passage of

0:23:49.720 --> 0:23:54.639
<v Speaker 1>dramatic reading. Apparently Dolly was named Dolly because she was

0:23:54.640 --> 0:23:57.960
<v Speaker 1>grown from a mammary cell. So it was a nineties

0:23:58.040 --> 0:23:59.960
<v Speaker 1>haha joke about Dolly Park.

0:24:00.560 --> 0:24:03.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I think we might have said that in the

0:24:03.520 --> 0:24:04.320
<v Speaker 2>Delli parton episode.

0:24:04.320 --> 0:24:05.879
<v Speaker 1>Didn't make or did If we did, I'll have to

0:24:05.880 --> 0:24:08.240
<v Speaker 1>go back and listen. If so, we'll edit this part out.

0:24:08.400 --> 0:24:10.120
<v Speaker 2>No, no, no, the beers repeating, I think.

0:24:10.320 --> 0:24:12.879
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So, yes, we're a little ways off, because not

0:24:12.920 --> 0:24:16.200
<v Speaker 1>only Chuck, are we not capable of growing human from cells.

0:24:16.520 --> 0:24:21.320
<v Speaker 1>We're not capable of growing kidneys or hearts, but we

0:24:21.359 --> 0:24:28.040
<v Speaker 1>are somewhere. We've grown and successfully transplanted windpipes, bladders fairly

0:24:28.160 --> 0:24:33.359
<v Speaker 1>like simple organs and structures. But I mean simple as

0:24:33.440 --> 0:24:35.600
<v Speaker 1>like a relative term, because we're talking about something that

0:24:35.680 --> 0:24:40.280
<v Speaker 1>was grown from that person's own cells into the very

0:24:40.880 --> 0:24:43.720
<v Speaker 1>piece of equipment that they needed and then put in

0:24:43.800 --> 0:24:44.879
<v Speaker 1>them and it worked.

0:24:45.600 --> 0:24:48.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, which is remarkable. I know that they can do

0:24:48.800 --> 0:24:52.840
<v Speaker 2>this with, at least right now, the epidermis. So if

0:24:52.840 --> 0:24:56.639
<v Speaker 2>you're a burn victim, you can get your own stem

0:24:56.680 --> 0:25:00.359
<v Speaker 2>cells and you can get some new epidermis of about

0:25:00.400 --> 0:25:02.960
<v Speaker 2>to say, just skin, but they're working on growing like

0:25:03.000 --> 0:25:05.080
<v Speaker 2>the entire thickness of the skin. They're not there yet,

0:25:05.480 --> 0:25:09.119
<v Speaker 2>but they can now grow epidermis from your own stem

0:25:09.119 --> 0:25:14.040
<v Speaker 2>cells in a lab and they transfer it to something

0:25:14.080 --> 0:25:17.439
<v Speaker 2>called fibrine, which is a protein that really kind of

0:25:17.440 --> 0:25:19.960
<v Speaker 2>helps your blood clot when you get a cut or something,

0:25:20.760 --> 0:25:23.439
<v Speaker 2>and then they put it on your body and it

0:25:23.720 --> 0:25:27.480
<v Speaker 2>just it goes and then you're done.

0:25:27.720 --> 0:25:29.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's it makes that sound.

0:25:29.560 --> 0:25:31.600
<v Speaker 2>It takes you know, obviously it's a process. I was

0:25:31.640 --> 0:25:34.840
<v Speaker 2>just kidding around, But right now they can't like grow

0:25:35.280 --> 0:25:38.720
<v Speaker 2>skin that grows hair or sebaceous glands and stuff like that.

0:25:38.760 --> 0:25:41.120
<v Speaker 2>But if you're a burn victim and you can get

0:25:41.160 --> 0:25:46.160
<v Speaker 2>you know, your own epidermis to replace you know, your

0:25:46.200 --> 0:25:49.440
<v Speaker 2>scarred skin on your body, then that's pretty amazing.

0:25:49.800 --> 0:25:53.359
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of akin to laying sod, but with skin,

0:25:54.040 --> 0:25:59.479
<v Speaker 1>you know. Sure, So right now, I think the state

0:25:59.560 --> 0:26:02.800
<v Speaker 1>of the art with organ and genesis that extra oh

0:26:02.840 --> 0:26:05.800
<v Speaker 1>trips me up and I like to add syllables. So

0:26:05.840 --> 0:26:12.240
<v Speaker 1>that's a real tricky one is growing organs in other animals,

0:26:13.280 --> 0:26:16.639
<v Speaker 1>And as we'll see, hopefully we're going to be moving

0:26:16.680 --> 0:26:19.320
<v Speaker 1>away from that because to take that organ from the

0:26:19.359 --> 0:26:21.679
<v Speaker 1>animal and transplant it into a human, you kill that

0:26:21.760 --> 0:26:25.440
<v Speaker 1>animal in the process, right Like you don't. You can't

0:26:25.440 --> 0:26:27.359
<v Speaker 1>take a pig's heart and be like, good luck with

0:26:27.400 --> 0:26:29.080
<v Speaker 1>the rest of your life, because it doesn't have a

0:26:29.160 --> 0:26:32.800
<v Speaker 1>rest of its life. It's missing its heart. And from

0:26:32.840 --> 0:26:35.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the trends that I've seen, it seems

0:26:35.840 --> 0:26:38.840
<v Speaker 1>like a fairly safe bet that we're moving in a

0:26:38.880 --> 0:26:43.159
<v Speaker 1>direction where animal welfare is going to become more and

0:26:43.240 --> 0:26:47.600
<v Speaker 1>more and more important to where how we treat animals

0:26:47.640 --> 0:26:50.919
<v Speaker 1>will be maybe the most critical thing that people will

0:26:51.040 --> 0:26:53.640
<v Speaker 1>of the future will look back at us on you.

0:26:53.600 --> 0:26:57.040
<v Speaker 2>Know, yeah, which that's coming up in a more robust

0:26:57.080 --> 0:26:59.920
<v Speaker 2>way in a second. But to finish this up, there's

0:27:00.119 --> 0:27:05.040
<v Speaker 2>also three D bioprinting, which is pretty amazing. I remember

0:27:05.160 --> 0:27:08.040
<v Speaker 2>telling the story one time. I've known two people in

0:27:08.080 --> 0:27:14.560
<v Speaker 2>my life who were born without an external ear, and

0:27:15.520 --> 0:27:19.080
<v Speaker 2>the process back then was they formed a sort of

0:27:19.080 --> 0:27:24.160
<v Speaker 2>a skeleton of the shape of an ear, and if

0:27:24.160 --> 0:27:25.840
<v Speaker 2>I'm not I'm not sure what it was made of,

0:27:26.160 --> 0:27:29.680
<v Speaker 2>I think cartilage. But if I'm not mistaken, that then

0:27:30.160 --> 0:27:34.560
<v Speaker 2>was there was like a skin bubble around it, and

0:27:34.560 --> 0:27:37.480
<v Speaker 2>then they would suck the air out of that skin

0:27:37.520 --> 0:27:42.159
<v Speaker 2>bubble very quickly to onto that cartilage to form you

0:27:42.200 --> 0:27:46.560
<v Speaker 2>know what looked close enough to an external ear. And

0:27:46.600 --> 0:27:49.199
<v Speaker 2>I say external like you know, the ear parts or.

0:27:49.280 --> 0:27:50.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I know it's talking about.

0:27:51.520 --> 0:27:53.240
<v Speaker 2>And I've known two people in my life that had

0:27:53.240 --> 0:27:55.320
<v Speaker 2>that done and they, you know, back in the day,

0:27:55.400 --> 0:27:56.960
<v Speaker 2>it was not like it is now. I think the

0:27:57.000 --> 0:28:01.400
<v Speaker 2>three D bioprinting of ears is much much further along

0:28:01.400 --> 0:28:03.040
<v Speaker 2>and they look much better than they used to. And

0:28:03.040 --> 0:28:05.359
<v Speaker 2>that's kind of the point, right, But they're thinking that,

0:28:05.840 --> 0:28:08.880
<v Speaker 2>you know, maybe one day we can three D bioprint

0:28:08.920 --> 0:28:09.359
<v Speaker 2>a liver.

0:28:10.119 --> 0:28:13.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, pretty amazing, and that'll kind of come up well

0:28:13.640 --> 0:28:16.239
<v Speaker 1>in the next section two. So I say we move

0:28:16.280 --> 0:28:18.080
<v Speaker 1>on to the next section because it does kind of

0:28:18.119 --> 0:28:19.639
<v Speaker 1>tie into what we were talking about.

0:28:19.680 --> 0:28:21.400
<v Speaker 2>Just now, that's right, let's do it.

0:28:21.960 --> 0:28:26.160
<v Speaker 1>So getting meat from animals is probably something that will

0:28:26.200 --> 0:28:29.639
<v Speaker 1>really be looked down upon in the future because we

0:28:29.720 --> 0:28:35.119
<v Speaker 1>already have techniques that will that make it so we

0:28:35.119 --> 0:28:39.400
<v Speaker 1>don't really need live animals to create meat to eat meat,

0:28:40.880 --> 0:28:43.840
<v Speaker 1>and yet we're still eating meat. And that's despite and

0:28:43.880 --> 0:28:46.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm very much guilty of this too, that's despite knowing

0:28:46.560 --> 0:28:51.200
<v Speaker 1>how horrific and terrible factory farming is for the animals themselves,

0:28:51.200 --> 0:28:54.720
<v Speaker 1>for the environment. People just really love meat and it's

0:28:54.760 --> 0:28:57.040
<v Speaker 1>tough to give up. So rather than forcing people to

0:28:57.040 --> 0:28:59.560
<v Speaker 1>give up, there's other alternatives that people are working on

0:28:59.560 --> 0:29:03.400
<v Speaker 1>to replace. We're going to need to do that too, because, apparently, Chuck,

0:29:04.400 --> 0:29:07.520
<v Speaker 1>the growing demand for meat is going to be totally

0:29:07.640 --> 0:29:09.520
<v Speaker 1>unsustainable in the next couple decades.

0:29:10.040 --> 0:29:12.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, there are statistics like the UN will

0:29:12.880 --> 0:29:15.719
<v Speaker 2>throw out that say we're going to by the year

0:29:15.760 --> 0:29:17.960
<v Speaker 2>twenty fifty, the meat demand means we're going to have

0:29:18.040 --> 0:29:20.440
<v Speaker 2>to produce fifty to one hundred percent more meat than

0:29:20.480 --> 0:29:24.520
<v Speaker 2>we do now. But there's also other people saying, like, Hey,

0:29:24.600 --> 0:29:29.120
<v Speaker 2>this whole notion of you know, wealthier countries eat meat

0:29:29.120 --> 0:29:32.160
<v Speaker 2>because they can afford it and countries that are more

0:29:32.160 --> 0:29:36.640
<v Speaker 2>developing eat agriculturally largely or vegetarian because they're forced to,

0:29:37.520 --> 0:29:40.600
<v Speaker 2>isn't really the case any or at least moving forward,

0:29:40.640 --> 0:29:43.480
<v Speaker 2>it looks like because what they found is the emerging

0:29:43.520 --> 0:29:47.280
<v Speaker 2>trend is that people are eating less meat once they

0:29:47.520 --> 0:29:50.120
<v Speaker 2>get enough of wealth to afford it for a bunch

0:29:50.160 --> 0:29:52.080
<v Speaker 2>of reasons, and one of which is what you're talking about,

0:29:52.120 --> 0:29:56.200
<v Speaker 2>is there's just a forever changing way that humans look

0:29:56.280 --> 0:29:59.840
<v Speaker 2>at animals and animal welfare for one. And also you

0:30:00.320 --> 0:30:02.440
<v Speaker 2>red meat in the fact that it's terrible for your

0:30:02.480 --> 0:30:04.160
<v Speaker 2>body is another one.

0:30:04.040 --> 0:30:08.600
<v Speaker 1>And terrible for the environment livestock raising that includes transportation,

0:30:08.840 --> 0:30:12.080
<v Speaker 1>tractor emissions, but also methane from the cow shooting ducks

0:30:12.120 --> 0:30:14.640
<v Speaker 1>all the time that it counts for fourteen and a

0:30:14.680 --> 0:30:18.600
<v Speaker 1>half percent of global greenhouse gas emissions. So it has

0:30:18.680 --> 0:30:23.360
<v Speaker 1>like this triple impact, triple negative impact on the animal's welfare,

0:30:23.760 --> 0:30:28.160
<v Speaker 1>the human body, and the health of the earth. And

0:30:28.440 --> 0:30:31.320
<v Speaker 1>for those reasons, it does seem like people in wealthier

0:30:31.360 --> 0:30:34.520
<v Speaker 1>countries are starting to move away from meat, and so

0:30:34.640 --> 0:30:39.480
<v Speaker 1>I think the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development they

0:30:39.520 --> 0:30:42.480
<v Speaker 1>released an Agricultural Outlook within the last couple of years

0:30:42.880 --> 0:30:45.760
<v Speaker 1>and they predicted that around twenty seventy five, the whole

0:30:45.800 --> 0:30:50.400
<v Speaker 1>world will start moving away from meat and that eventually

0:30:50.400 --> 0:30:53.640
<v Speaker 1>we're just going to stop eating what's called carcass meat

0:30:54.320 --> 0:30:56.000
<v Speaker 1>very appropriately altogether.

0:30:56.640 --> 0:30:59.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, can I tell you something really quick about a

0:30:59.480 --> 0:31:03.640
<v Speaker 2>Instagram all today. Yeah, it has to do with the

0:31:03.680 --> 0:31:07.560
<v Speaker 2>cows and the methane. Actually, our colleague, our old friend,

0:31:07.560 --> 0:31:10.120
<v Speaker 2>Tamika at work posted this, yeah, and it was a

0:31:10.200 --> 0:31:13.200
<v Speaker 2>video of a guy that was showed how they treat

0:31:13.240 --> 0:31:16.560
<v Speaker 2>bloat in cows. Have you seen this? No, when a

0:31:16.600 --> 0:31:21.880
<v Speaker 2>cow gets bloated with gas, they stick a needle into

0:31:22.080 --> 0:31:27.320
<v Speaker 2>the cow's stomach, releasing methane and they light that thing

0:31:28.680 --> 0:31:31.320
<v Speaker 2>so they can see a flame to judge like how

0:31:31.400 --> 0:31:34.320
<v Speaker 2>much gas is still in there. Oh wow, So there

0:31:34.360 --> 0:31:36.920
<v Speaker 2>was a video of a cow with a with a

0:31:37.080 --> 0:31:38.520
<v Speaker 2>blowtorch coming out of its side.

0:31:38.560 --> 0:31:41.360
<v Speaker 1>Essentially wow, what was the cow's expression?

0:31:41.520 --> 0:31:43.520
<v Speaker 2>Like, Well, all I saw was the cow, but the

0:31:44.240 --> 0:31:47.840
<v Speaker 2>guy who was hosting the video his expression was horrified

0:31:47.880 --> 0:31:50.600
<v Speaker 2>because he was like, you know, can you believe that

0:31:50.640 --> 0:31:51.880
<v Speaker 2>this is where we are in the world.

0:31:52.320 --> 0:31:55.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I totally can believe that. That doesn't surprise me at all,

0:31:55.280 --> 0:31:56.160
<v Speaker 1>to tell you the truth.

0:31:56.320 --> 0:31:57.920
<v Speaker 2>And they're trying to help the cow, but it's you know,

0:31:57.960 --> 0:32:01.800
<v Speaker 2>the cows. The reason cow's there is because of factory partment.

0:32:02.160 --> 0:32:04.760
<v Speaker 1>Right. Tamiko, by the way, has one of the better

0:32:05.320 --> 0:32:08.360
<v Speaker 1>non celebrity Instagram feeds you can find.

0:32:08.760 --> 0:32:10.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah to me, because this is great. It's good stuff.

0:32:11.160 --> 0:32:14.680
<v Speaker 2>But what you were saying about moving away from what'd

0:32:14.680 --> 0:32:17.680
<v Speaker 2>you call it, carcass meat? Yeah, there are two main

0:32:17.720 --> 0:32:20.600
<v Speaker 2>ways that that's happening right now, and that is obviously

0:32:21.160 --> 0:32:25.440
<v Speaker 2>what they call novel vegan meat replacements, you know, fake meat,

0:32:25.480 --> 0:32:30.480
<v Speaker 2>impossible stuff, beyond stuff, and then lab grown meat, which

0:32:31.000 --> 0:32:32.720
<v Speaker 2>did we do a whole episode on lab grown meat?

0:32:32.800 --> 0:32:33.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? We did a while back.

0:32:34.240 --> 0:32:35.960
<v Speaker 2>I thought so we should.

0:32:35.760 --> 0:32:38.200
<v Speaker 1>Update it like we did the recycling episode, you know,

0:32:38.240 --> 0:32:41.360
<v Speaker 1>like so much stuff has changed since total I'm sure, well,

0:32:41.360 --> 0:32:44.240
<v Speaker 1>we'll update it eventually. But lab grow meat or cultured

0:32:44.280 --> 0:32:47.360
<v Speaker 1>meat is exactly what it sounds like. You use a bioreactor,

0:32:47.480 --> 0:32:51.800
<v Speaker 1>sometimes a three D like bioprinter using animal cells to

0:32:51.920 --> 0:32:57.720
<v Speaker 1>recreate meat, and they I think the there's a consulting

0:32:57.760 --> 0:33:00.920
<v Speaker 1>group called at Kearney, they predict that by twenty forty,

0:33:00.960 --> 0:33:04.360
<v Speaker 1>which is not that long off everybody, the sixty percent

0:33:04.400 --> 0:33:09.120
<v Speaker 1>of global meat consumption will be from cultured or non

0:33:09.240 --> 0:33:13.960
<v Speaker 1>vegan meat replacements. Yeah, like that's significant. That's a huge change.

0:33:14.320 --> 0:33:17.120
<v Speaker 1>Like there may be countries that are developing now that

0:33:17.200 --> 0:33:20.960
<v Speaker 1>won't even eat carcass meat when they become wealthy because

0:33:21.280 --> 0:33:23.880
<v Speaker 1>the replacements will have become so great there'll be no

0:33:24.040 --> 0:33:25.160
<v Speaker 1>reason to eat meat.

0:33:26.400 --> 0:33:29.719
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. You know, if you ask the CEOs of beyond

0:33:29.760 --> 0:33:33.160
<v Speaker 2>it impossible, they're going to say, then fifteen years there

0:33:33.200 --> 0:33:36.400
<v Speaker 2>will be no more eating of meat. Yeah, that's a

0:33:36.400 --> 0:33:39.280
<v Speaker 2>little ambitious, and I think that, you know, maybe they're

0:33:39.280 --> 0:33:43.480
<v Speaker 2>trying to drive up the stock price, so that's probably

0:33:43.480 --> 0:33:45.480
<v Speaker 2>not going to be the case, but that that at

0:33:45.640 --> 0:33:49.880
<v Speaker 2>Kearney group prediction, like, that's that seems quite possible.

0:33:50.000 --> 0:33:52.800
<v Speaker 1>I buy that, especially if there's a couple of challenges

0:33:52.840 --> 0:33:56.200
<v Speaker 1>that are overcome by then, which is you know, that's

0:33:56.200 --> 0:34:01.120
<v Speaker 1>seventeenth sorry, sixteen years now away, and that's plenty of

0:34:01.200 --> 0:34:06.280
<v Speaker 1>time to overcome some relative speed bumps. One is replicating no,

0:34:06.440 --> 0:34:09.239
<v Speaker 1>I think they have flavor kind of locked, at least

0:34:09.239 --> 0:34:10.759
<v Speaker 1>as far as cultured meat goes.

0:34:10.920 --> 0:34:13.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, texture textures.

0:34:13.040 --> 0:34:15.719
<v Speaker 1>The problem, because you don't want to eat like a

0:34:15.760 --> 0:34:22.440
<v Speaker 1>little a little scobie of beef that tastes just like

0:34:22.520 --> 0:34:25.600
<v Speaker 1>beef but looks like a scobi from a kombucha batch.

0:34:26.160 --> 0:34:29.800
<v Speaker 1>No one wants to eat that. And yet Japanese researchers

0:34:29.840 --> 0:34:34.160
<v Speaker 1>recently showed I think according to freethink, this great website

0:34:34.160 --> 0:34:37.840
<v Speaker 1>I found in twenty twenty one, they recreated a Wagoo

0:34:37.960 --> 0:34:41.480
<v Speaker 1>steak which has got some of the most complex marbling

0:34:41.520 --> 0:34:44.640
<v Speaker 1>of fat mixed in with the meat that you could

0:34:44.680 --> 0:34:49.319
<v Speaker 1>possibly ever come across, and they faithfully recreated one. I'm

0:34:49.360 --> 0:34:52.120
<v Speaker 1>sure it cost them a million and a half dollars

0:34:52.120 --> 0:34:54.400
<v Speaker 1>to make that one steak, but there was a proof

0:34:54.440 --> 0:34:57.560
<v Speaker 1>of concept that it can be done. The other big

0:34:57.640 --> 0:35:01.520
<v Speaker 1>challenge is right now, when you're making that Wagou steak

0:35:01.800 --> 0:35:05.680
<v Speaker 1>from cellular culture, you actually need to take it from

0:35:05.680 --> 0:35:08.919
<v Speaker 1>an unborn calf as you slaughter the mom. I don't

0:35:08.920 --> 0:35:11.640
<v Speaker 1>think the mom has to be slaughtered. I think they

0:35:11.719 --> 0:35:14.680
<v Speaker 1>just take it while they're slaughtering the mom. Yeah, and

0:35:14.719 --> 0:35:17.120
<v Speaker 1>that's what they used to grow meat. Right now, and

0:35:17.160 --> 0:35:19.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people are like, no, still, I'm not

0:35:19.680 --> 0:35:23.960
<v Speaker 1>okay with that. It's still an animal suffers somehow, some way.

0:35:25.040 --> 0:35:28.440
<v Speaker 1>And so there's a company called Meetable, a Dutch company

0:35:28.440 --> 0:35:30.520
<v Speaker 1>that said, we got this, we got our way around this.

0:35:31.080 --> 0:35:34.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, they made us sausage in July twenty twenty two

0:35:35.239 --> 0:35:40.239
<v Speaker 2>that was lab grown sausage, lab grown pork. But it

0:35:40.320 --> 0:35:43.080
<v Speaker 2>was it did not use I don't think we said.

0:35:43.120 --> 0:35:46.600
<v Speaker 2>What it's called fetal bovine serum. Is that blood drawn

0:35:46.680 --> 0:35:49.319
<v Speaker 2>from the cow's fetus, and that's what you said, it's

0:35:49.360 --> 0:35:52.359
<v Speaker 2>typically used, but they didn't use that at all. It

0:35:52.480 --> 0:35:56.640
<v Speaker 2>was you know, there was no animal involved.

0:35:56.840 --> 0:35:59.359
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, they used cells from like a live animal that

0:35:59.440 --> 0:36:00.440
<v Speaker 1>was unharmed by it.

0:36:00.480 --> 0:36:02.320
<v Speaker 2>Well yeah, yeah, that's what I meant. No, no animal

0:36:02.520 --> 0:36:04.160
<v Speaker 2>involved is in their death?

0:36:04.239 --> 0:36:07.480
<v Speaker 1>Was not involved, right right, exactly? Yeah, the animal couldn't

0:36:07.480 --> 0:36:10.839
<v Speaker 1>have cared less either way. From what I understand they did.

0:36:11.640 --> 0:36:14.239
<v Speaker 1>They were in the process of having they were being degassed,

0:36:14.280 --> 0:36:16.840
<v Speaker 1>so they had bigger fish to fry than somebody scraping

0:36:16.880 --> 0:36:18.360
<v Speaker 1>a few cells off their hind quarters.

0:36:18.360 --> 0:36:19.879
<v Speaker 2>You know, it's like I got a blowtorch coming out

0:36:19.880 --> 0:36:21.200
<v Speaker 2>of my exactly.

0:36:22.080 --> 0:36:24.879
<v Speaker 1>Uh, okay, I say we move on. Oh but first, Chuck,

0:36:24.960 --> 0:36:29.080
<v Speaker 1>let's take a break, because it's it's that kind of time.

0:36:29.719 --> 0:36:30.239
<v Speaker 2>Let's do it.

0:36:51.239 --> 0:36:56.080
<v Speaker 1>Okay, we're back, Charles. We're talking about what people in

0:36:56.120 --> 0:36:57.920
<v Speaker 1>the future are going to think of us based on

0:36:57.960 --> 0:37:00.880
<v Speaker 1>the stuff we do today that may seem primitive, and

0:37:00.960 --> 0:37:03.720
<v Speaker 1>one of them might not seem well, it could seem primitive,

0:37:03.719 --> 0:37:07.920
<v Speaker 1>it'll seem quaint. Probably is driving a car yourself, Yeah,

0:37:08.040 --> 0:37:11.600
<v Speaker 1>or maybe even owning your own car, because the predictions

0:37:11.600 --> 0:37:16.200
<v Speaker 1>for the future are that car hailing apps will become

0:37:16.239 --> 0:37:18.799
<v Speaker 1>so ubiquitous that you're gonna need your own car less

0:37:18.800 --> 0:37:21.879
<v Speaker 1>and less and less. This is a prediction from Karas

0:37:21.920 --> 0:37:25.759
<v Speaker 1>Swisser Swisher the New York Times tech colonists. Sorry Kara,

0:37:27.520 --> 0:37:30.920
<v Speaker 1>that in not too many years, owning your own car

0:37:31.000 --> 0:37:34.280
<v Speaker 1>is going to become obsolete. And then eventually the next step.

0:37:34.440 --> 0:37:37.719
<v Speaker 1>This is me adding to that prediction, those cars that

0:37:37.840 --> 0:37:39.920
<v Speaker 1>pick you up when you use a ride hailing app

0:37:40.120 --> 0:37:42.600
<v Speaker 1>will not have a driver in them. You will just

0:37:42.640 --> 0:37:43.640
<v Speaker 1>get in the back and go.

0:37:44.320 --> 0:37:47.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I mean, self driving cars has been in the

0:37:47.040 --> 0:37:50.640
<v Speaker 2>news a lot over the past you know, decade or so.

0:37:51.360 --> 0:37:54.520
<v Speaker 2>I remember being in San Francisco, a couple of years

0:37:54.560 --> 0:37:58.759
<v Speaker 2>ago and seeing a car with a crazy contraption on top,

0:37:59.480 --> 0:38:00.880
<v Speaker 2>and I was like, what in the world is that?

0:38:01.120 --> 0:38:03.959
<v Speaker 2>And is that a Google Maps or a Google Earth

0:38:04.120 --> 0:38:05.760
<v Speaker 2>like thing taking pictures.

0:38:05.400 --> 0:38:06.960
<v Speaker 1>That car's wearing braces.

0:38:07.400 --> 0:38:10.120
<v Speaker 2>Then I looked inside. It's like no, no, no, there's

0:38:10.160 --> 0:38:13.000
<v Speaker 2>no human in that car. And it kind of startled me.

0:38:13.160 --> 0:38:15.440
<v Speaker 1>But just showing witchcraft, right.

0:38:16.960 --> 0:38:19.719
<v Speaker 2>I did. I threw a Molotov cocktail out of it

0:38:19.719 --> 0:38:23.040
<v Speaker 2>all to care of that problem. But there was a company,

0:38:23.600 --> 0:38:24.880
<v Speaker 2>I think there were you know, there's more than one

0:38:24.880 --> 0:38:27.320
<v Speaker 2>company that's trying this stuff out, but there's a company

0:38:27.360 --> 0:38:32.160
<v Speaker 2>called Cruise, which just recently in October of this year. Well,

0:38:32.200 --> 0:38:35.040
<v Speaker 2>I guess last year now of twenty twenty three, the

0:38:35.080 --> 0:38:40.480
<v Speaker 2>California state government said you can't do this, you can't

0:38:40.480 --> 0:38:44.239
<v Speaker 2>practice this anymore, no more driverless practicing out of you

0:38:45.320 --> 0:38:48.200
<v Speaker 2>because well, for a lot of reasons building up to

0:38:48.760 --> 0:38:52.560
<v Speaker 2>what was called the incident, but minor incidents involved things

0:38:52.600 --> 0:38:56.560
<v Speaker 2>like blocking ambulances, stopping in the middle of an intersection,

0:38:57.920 --> 0:39:01.960
<v Speaker 2>rearinding a bus, running red light, stuff like that. But

0:39:02.080 --> 0:39:05.760
<v Speaker 2>the big incident was when a pedestrian finally was bound

0:39:05.760 --> 0:39:10.160
<v Speaker 2>to happen, was hit in downtown San Francisco when she

0:39:10.320 --> 0:39:12.560
<v Speaker 2>was hit by another car driven by a real human,

0:39:13.080 --> 0:39:16.279
<v Speaker 2>knocked into the other lane, and then the Cruise car

0:39:16.480 --> 0:39:22.320
<v Speaker 2>apparently braked but then rolled over her anyway, pulled her forward,

0:39:22.440 --> 0:39:24.520
<v Speaker 2>and then stopped on top of her.

0:39:24.880 --> 0:39:26.719
<v Speaker 1>Just stopped. It was like, Okay, I'm fine, I don't

0:39:26.760 --> 0:39:28.719
<v Speaker 1>know what to do. I'm just gonna freeze right here

0:39:28.760 --> 0:39:32.000
<v Speaker 1>on top of this pedestrian. So yeah, Cruise is far

0:39:32.080 --> 0:39:36.919
<v Speaker 1>and away the only company from having problems with their

0:39:37.160 --> 0:39:40.080
<v Speaker 1>tech that they're working on. They're just the most recent

0:39:40.160 --> 0:39:43.280
<v Speaker 1>poster child of the problems with self driving cars.

0:39:43.680 --> 0:39:45.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah she didn't die, by the way, No, thank.

0:39:45.560 --> 0:39:46.279
<v Speaker 1>You for saying that.

0:39:46.520 --> 0:39:46.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:39:47.080 --> 0:39:50.640
<v Speaker 1>The point of this is, though, is that despite these setbacks,

0:39:51.680 --> 0:39:54.320
<v Speaker 1>we exist in the time of setbacks. In a couple

0:39:54.360 --> 0:39:56.840
<v Speaker 1>of decades, will exist in the time where were beyond

0:39:56.840 --> 0:39:59.759
<v Speaker 1>those setbacks and we have driverless cars. These setbacks don't

0:39:59.760 --> 0:40:02.560
<v Speaker 1>mean we're never going to have driverless cars. In fact,

0:40:02.560 --> 0:40:05.919
<v Speaker 1>even people who are super skeptical of them right now

0:40:06.080 --> 0:40:09.160
<v Speaker 1>still admit we're probably going to have them at some

0:40:09.360 --> 0:40:11.919
<v Speaker 1>point in the future. It's just a question of when.

0:40:12.320 --> 0:40:16.040
<v Speaker 1>And it seems like we're a little further behind than

0:40:16.080 --> 0:40:18.160
<v Speaker 1>we may have thought a few years ago.

0:40:18.960 --> 0:40:21.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and you know one thing that if it's not,

0:40:21.400 --> 0:40:24.400
<v Speaker 2>I think the road there may not be as abrupt

0:40:24.520 --> 0:40:28.000
<v Speaker 2>because we already see in newer cars a lot of

0:40:28.080 --> 0:40:33.080
<v Speaker 2>like things like lane assistance, Like your car will correct

0:40:33.080 --> 0:40:36.280
<v Speaker 2>itself and steer itself back if it sees that it's

0:40:36.360 --> 0:40:39.280
<v Speaker 2>driving off the road, like if you're drowsy or you're

0:40:39.320 --> 0:40:42.120
<v Speaker 2>on your phone, which you should never be, so you

0:40:42.160 --> 0:40:45.640
<v Speaker 2>see like lane assistants and stuff like that. You know,

0:40:45.680 --> 0:40:49.000
<v Speaker 2>if your speed like really really changes a lot. A

0:40:49.000 --> 0:40:50.920
<v Speaker 2>lot of times cars these days will send you an

0:40:50.920 --> 0:40:53.879
<v Speaker 2>alert that says, like, you know, are you okay? Maybe

0:40:53.880 --> 0:40:56.799
<v Speaker 2>you should pull over, stuff like that. So that's sort

0:40:56.840 --> 0:41:00.239
<v Speaker 2>of like these are the intermediary steps that will lead

0:41:00.280 --> 0:41:03.040
<v Speaker 2>to full automation, and they've already come a long way,

0:41:03.040 --> 0:41:06.000
<v Speaker 2>but apparently, again with the help of AI, they could

0:41:06.000 --> 0:41:06.720
<v Speaker 2>go a lot further.

0:41:07.120 --> 0:41:09.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, eventually the cars is going to start talking to

0:41:09.200 --> 0:41:11.359
<v Speaker 1>itself and you'll feel so left out you just don't

0:41:11.360 --> 0:41:14.879
<v Speaker 1>even get in the driver's seat anymore. But the whole

0:41:14.920 --> 0:41:19.080
<v Speaker 1>point of removing humans from cars is to remove humans

0:41:19.160 --> 0:41:23.759
<v Speaker 1>from the equation of driving, not for our convenience necessarily,

0:41:23.760 --> 0:41:26.120
<v Speaker 1>but for our safety because we're our own worst enemies

0:41:26.120 --> 0:41:29.960
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to driving. You found a stat that recently,

0:41:30.080 --> 0:41:32.120
<v Speaker 1>it was it like twenty twenty twenty twenty one.

0:41:32.120 --> 0:41:35.640
<v Speaker 2>Do you know it's twenty twenty one, But just over

0:41:35.680 --> 0:41:37.960
<v Speaker 2>the last few years, in general, it's been about thirty

0:41:38.000 --> 0:41:39.319
<v Speaker 2>to thirty three percent.

0:41:39.360 --> 0:41:43.160
<v Speaker 1>Of fatalities involved at least one of the drivers being drunk.

0:41:43.680 --> 0:41:46.840
<v Speaker 1>I couldn't find any statistics that also include drugs, but

0:41:47.239 --> 0:41:51.680
<v Speaker 1>just being drunk alone, thirty percent of people who die

0:41:51.719 --> 0:41:54.880
<v Speaker 1>in the United States die because one of the people

0:41:55.280 --> 0:42:00.160
<v Speaker 1>involved in that crash was drunk. That is unacceptable, but

0:42:00.239 --> 0:42:03.160
<v Speaker 1>it's humans. People do that. It's a terrible decision. People

0:42:03.160 --> 0:42:04.880
<v Speaker 1>think that that's not going to happen to them, and

0:42:05.160 --> 0:42:07.920
<v Speaker 1>it does, and it accounts for thousands and thousands and

0:42:07.960 --> 0:42:12.400
<v Speaker 1>thousands of deaths every year. Yeah, driverless cars don't drink.

0:42:12.520 --> 0:42:15.600
<v Speaker 1>They have other problems right now, But as we work

0:42:15.640 --> 0:42:18.600
<v Speaker 1>them out, those problems will become a part of the past,

0:42:18.680 --> 0:42:22.080
<v Speaker 1>and drunk driving accidents will become a part of the

0:42:22.120 --> 0:42:24.200
<v Speaker 1>past as well, which will be great for everybody.

0:42:24.719 --> 0:42:28.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, ninety four percent of any accident in

0:42:28.239 --> 0:42:31.680
<v Speaker 2>the United States involves some kind of human error. So

0:42:32.120 --> 0:42:35.279
<v Speaker 2>you know what I'm curious about is what the acceptable

0:42:35.320 --> 0:42:39.480
<v Speaker 2>percentage of driverless car error, because it seems like it

0:42:39.480 --> 0:42:44.359
<v Speaker 2>seems like human car error is just endlessly forgivable, to

0:42:44.440 --> 0:42:48.000
<v Speaker 2>the point where, you know, like every car these days

0:42:48.000 --> 0:42:50.560
<v Speaker 2>you shouldn't be able to start unless you can blow

0:42:50.600 --> 0:42:53.839
<v Speaker 2>into a breathalyzer like that technology is there.

0:42:54.040 --> 0:42:56.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we're harder on computers than we are in ourselves,

0:42:56.400 --> 0:42:56.959
<v Speaker 1>is what you're saying.

0:42:57.000 --> 0:42:59.759
<v Speaker 2>Huh, well exactly, So, like what if all of a sudden,

0:42:59.840 --> 0:43:02.720
<v Speaker 2>driverless cars they prove, like you know, they can reduce

0:43:03.000 --> 0:43:06.960
<v Speaker 2>total accidents by ninety percent, there would still be people saying, like,

0:43:07.239 --> 0:43:10.520
<v Speaker 2>in those ten percent of cases where someone died, it

0:43:10.600 --> 0:43:12.560
<v Speaker 2>was some AI computer or whatever.

0:43:12.719 --> 0:43:13.239
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:43:13.280 --> 0:43:15.080
<v Speaker 2>So it's just I don't know, just find it really

0:43:15.120 --> 0:43:18.160
<v Speaker 2>interesting that we still allow people to get into a

0:43:18.200 --> 0:43:21.440
<v Speaker 2>car after they've been drinking and drive, even though the

0:43:21.480 --> 0:43:24.760
<v Speaker 2>technology exists to stop that from happening.

0:43:24.880 --> 0:43:27.440
<v Speaker 1>Well, yeah, I think that it's a cognitive bias of ours.

0:43:27.480 --> 0:43:29.840
<v Speaker 1>We tend to focus on the more sensational, and the

0:43:29.880 --> 0:43:32.720
<v Speaker 1>more sensational. Is a car being driven by a computer

0:43:32.920 --> 0:43:39.560
<v Speaker 1>killing somebody than a drunk dude killing somebody in his car. Yeah,

0:43:39.840 --> 0:43:43.160
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, there's just removing people from the equation should

0:43:43.200 --> 0:43:48.440
<v Speaker 1>increase safety. It should also probably increase or decrease pollution

0:43:48.760 --> 0:43:50.719
<v Speaker 1>as a result. There's somebody who came up with the

0:43:50.719 --> 0:43:54.000
<v Speaker 1>eye popping statistic that thirty percent of the traffic in

0:43:54.080 --> 0:43:58.560
<v Speaker 1>metropolitan areas is people circling the block looking for a

0:43:58.600 --> 0:44:01.560
<v Speaker 1>place to park. If you don't own a car and

0:44:01.600 --> 0:44:04.160
<v Speaker 1>you're not driving your own car, that goes away. So

0:44:04.239 --> 0:44:08.760
<v Speaker 1>thirty percent of traffic goes away instantaneously with that, Yeah,

0:44:09.000 --> 0:44:13.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean that you have me right there. Yeah, yeah,

0:44:13.360 --> 0:44:16.839
<v Speaker 1>So driverless cars almost certainly coming down the pike, as

0:44:16.880 --> 0:44:19.120
<v Speaker 1>long as AI doesn't take over the world, of course,

0:44:19.160 --> 0:44:21.480
<v Speaker 1>I think we should caveat this entire episode with that

0:44:21.600 --> 0:44:24.560
<v Speaker 1>all of this is going to happen if AI doesn't

0:44:24.560 --> 0:44:25.440
<v Speaker 1>take over the world.

0:44:25.440 --> 0:44:28.319
<v Speaker 2>Okay, that's right, And we're going to finish up with

0:44:28.360 --> 0:44:32.080
<v Speaker 2>a couple of shorter ones that I think you're just

0:44:32.600 --> 0:44:37.000
<v Speaker 2>pretty awesome and interesting. One is the fact that sort

0:44:37.000 --> 0:44:39.840
<v Speaker 2>of the current thinking is that we we tend to

0:44:39.920 --> 0:44:45.480
<v Speaker 2>tie like progress as a nation, definitely in the United States,

0:44:45.480 --> 0:44:49.000
<v Speaker 2>but in most places around the world, to how like

0:44:49.160 --> 0:44:53.279
<v Speaker 2>robust and economy is. It's like always tied to finances

0:44:53.680 --> 0:44:56.200
<v Speaker 2>on what kind of progress we're making, and there are

0:44:56.239 --> 0:44:59.399
<v Speaker 2>people that think like sort of like with the way

0:44:59.440 --> 0:45:02.399
<v Speaker 2>we're starting to look at animals, like, you know, one

0:45:02.480 --> 0:45:04.920
<v Speaker 2>day that's not going to be the most important factor

0:45:04.960 --> 0:45:08.880
<v Speaker 2>for humans, and things like the health of the earth

0:45:09.120 --> 0:45:12.799
<v Speaker 2>and human beings health and well being both physically and

0:45:12.840 --> 0:45:16.840
<v Speaker 2>mentally is the you should equate that with the success

0:45:16.840 --> 0:45:19.279
<v Speaker 2>of a nation, And one day they're going to look

0:45:19.280 --> 0:45:21.600
<v Speaker 2>back and say, you remember when we all that we

0:45:21.680 --> 0:45:25.680
<v Speaker 2>cared about was the fact that the stock market was flesh.

0:45:25.800 --> 0:45:30.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, because we GDP just tells you whether an economy

0:45:30.120 --> 0:45:34.319
<v Speaker 1>is growing or shrinking, right, That's basically all it tells you,

0:45:35.280 --> 0:45:37.799
<v Speaker 1>And it leaves out a lot of stuff, like you said,

0:45:37.960 --> 0:45:42.239
<v Speaker 1>human well being, things like whether people are dying of

0:45:42.320 --> 0:45:46.200
<v Speaker 1>deaths of despair or whether they're generally happy, how many

0:45:46.239 --> 0:45:49.360
<v Speaker 1>resources are being depleted. Is anybody working on an alternative

0:45:49.440 --> 0:45:53.440
<v Speaker 1>that all of the stuff that creates that growing economy

0:45:53.560 --> 0:45:56.680
<v Speaker 1>just is totally ignored? Yeah, And I think that's what

0:45:56.719 --> 0:46:01.240
<v Speaker 1>that economist Kate Rayworth was saying, is like it's it's madness,

0:46:01.280 --> 0:46:04.759
<v Speaker 1>Like it's so ridiculous to just completely not count all

0:46:04.880 --> 0:46:09.319
<v Speaker 1>this stuff that really really counts in favor of just

0:46:09.400 --> 0:46:13.560
<v Speaker 1>this one metric, which is growth or shrinkage. And not

0:46:13.600 --> 0:46:17.640
<v Speaker 1>only is that probably going to be thought of as

0:46:17.719 --> 0:46:21.200
<v Speaker 1>ridiculous in the future. People younger people today, who are

0:46:21.200 --> 0:46:24.480
<v Speaker 1>becoming adults or who have recently become adults, they already

0:46:24.960 --> 0:46:28.279
<v Speaker 1>tend to think this way as a group. So it's

0:46:28.280 --> 0:46:31.720
<v Speaker 1>a pretty sure indicator that we're going to leave GDP

0:46:31.960 --> 0:46:35.360
<v Speaker 1>or growth behind as an indicator of the health of

0:46:35.400 --> 0:46:38.520
<v Speaker 1>an economy and start thinking more about the other stuff,

0:46:38.560 --> 0:46:42.080
<v Speaker 1>the more important stuff. And who knows what can result

0:46:42.080 --> 0:46:48.359
<v Speaker 1>from that, like what great cascading knock on effects that

0:46:48.360 --> 0:46:48.919
<v Speaker 1>that will have.

0:46:49.680 --> 0:46:54.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you found this Princeton University bioethicist named Peter Singer

0:46:55.239 --> 0:46:57.520
<v Speaker 2>who talked about the fact that the circle of concern

0:46:58.239 --> 0:47:03.960
<v Speaker 2>as humankind and advances is expanding, And that's just a

0:47:04.000 --> 0:47:06.080
<v Speaker 2>wonderful thought. And you know, you see it in everything

0:47:06.120 --> 0:47:08.400
<v Speaker 2>from the fact that you know, we've laughed before it

0:47:08.520 --> 0:47:10.440
<v Speaker 2>like the mad Men episode where people used to just

0:47:10.760 --> 0:47:14.719
<v Speaker 2>willingly throw litter on the ground, to you know, we

0:47:14.760 --> 0:47:19.200
<v Speaker 2>look back at that as barbaric generally. And that's just

0:47:19.239 --> 0:47:22.640
<v Speaker 2>one small example. So as as humans are evolving down

0:47:22.680 --> 0:47:26.200
<v Speaker 2>the line, that circle of concern is expanding and people

0:47:26.200 --> 0:47:29.399
<v Speaker 2>are caring about more and more things that they didn't

0:47:29.440 --> 0:47:31.320
<v Speaker 2>care about before, and that's that's great.

0:47:31.480 --> 0:47:33.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. And Peter Singer, by the way, is very famous

0:47:34.160 --> 0:47:38.000
<v Speaker 1>ethicists as far as animal rights are concerned in animal welfare.

0:47:38.840 --> 0:47:41.120
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, his whole thing is like, we're gonna stop

0:47:41.200 --> 0:47:46.480
<v Speaker 1>focusing on conspicuous consumption and rather you'll be more considered

0:47:46.800 --> 0:47:48.839
<v Speaker 1>like a great person, not from your wealth, but from

0:47:48.840 --> 0:47:51.520
<v Speaker 1>your charity and your charitable giving, which would be great.

0:47:52.280 --> 0:47:55.480
<v Speaker 1>And then that circle of concern kind of leads us

0:47:55.480 --> 0:47:58.960
<v Speaker 1>to our last one too, because the most recent inclusion

0:47:58.960 --> 0:48:01.799
<v Speaker 1>into the circle of conc is the environment, the earth,

0:48:01.880 --> 0:48:06.640
<v Speaker 1>the health of the earth, and that this one is

0:48:06.760 --> 0:48:10.359
<v Speaker 1>just a sure give me, there is no way that

0:48:10.400 --> 0:48:12.759
<v Speaker 1>we're not going to be looked down upon for this

0:48:12.960 --> 0:48:16.080
<v Speaker 1>by our descendants. So that is burning fossil fuels.

0:48:16.480 --> 0:48:20.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean in five hundred years, who knows, maybe sooner.

0:48:21.280 --> 0:48:23.359
<v Speaker 2>It seems like people will definitely look back and say,

0:48:23.400 --> 0:48:27.319
<v Speaker 2>I can't believe that we used to burn fossil fuels

0:48:27.360 --> 0:48:29.920
<v Speaker 2>like we did. And for a lot of reasons, not

0:48:30.040 --> 0:48:33.880
<v Speaker 2>just the you know the process of removing fossil fuels

0:48:33.920 --> 0:48:38.320
<v Speaker 2>and all that goes into that, or even the climate

0:48:38.360 --> 0:48:41.440
<v Speaker 2>and the ozone, which are all huge concerns obviously, but

0:48:41.760 --> 0:48:45.439
<v Speaker 2>just things like pollution and air quality and the fact

0:48:45.480 --> 0:48:48.920
<v Speaker 2>that you know that kills people and that costs so

0:48:49.160 --> 0:48:52.320
<v Speaker 2>much money in healthcare. I think there was a study

0:48:52.719 --> 0:48:56.400
<v Speaker 2>from the University of Wisconsin in Madison that said if

0:48:56.640 --> 0:48:59.800
<v Speaker 2>we stopped burning fossil fuels all together, it would have

0:49:00.480 --> 0:49:03.799
<v Speaker 2>about fifty thousand premature deaths per year because of air

0:49:03.880 --> 0:49:08.360
<v Speaker 2>quality alone, and about six hundred billion dollars annually and

0:49:08.440 --> 0:49:10.520
<v Speaker 2>the US alone and healthcare costs.

0:49:10.640 --> 0:49:12.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And I think even more than looking at us

0:49:12.880 --> 0:49:15.440
<v Speaker 1>as like dumb dumbs for ignoring that we're going to

0:49:15.440 --> 0:49:18.520
<v Speaker 1>be looked at, is kind of reviled because of the

0:49:18.520 --> 0:49:21.840
<v Speaker 1>future will have delivered our descendants because of the climate

0:49:21.920 --> 0:49:23.640
<v Speaker 1>change we just allowed to happen.

0:49:24.080 --> 0:49:24.279
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:49:24.560 --> 0:49:30.240
<v Speaker 1>I saw who estimate that two hundred and fifty thousand

0:49:30.239 --> 0:49:34.799
<v Speaker 1>additional deaths per year are expected to come each year

0:49:35.160 --> 0:49:38.840
<v Speaker 1>between twenty thirty and twenty fifty because of climate change

0:49:39.080 --> 0:49:44.040
<v Speaker 1>from things like heat stress, malnutrition, insect born diseases. That

0:49:44.160 --> 0:49:46.880
<v Speaker 1>an additional quarter of a million people are going to

0:49:46.920 --> 0:49:50.759
<v Speaker 1>die every year because of climate change starting six years

0:49:50.760 --> 0:49:54.000
<v Speaker 1>from now. That's nuts. So I can only imagine what

0:49:54.080 --> 0:49:56.680
<v Speaker 1>the people of you know, twenty one hundred are going

0:49:56.719 --> 0:49:59.560
<v Speaker 1>to think of us. Hopefully they'll have everything under control

0:49:59.600 --> 0:50:01.720
<v Speaker 1>by then, but they're probably going to be pretty ticked

0:50:01.719 --> 0:50:03.200
<v Speaker 1>off that they had to go to the trouble.

0:50:03.960 --> 0:50:05.719
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I mean, you can see this coming because it

0:50:05.760 --> 0:50:09.480
<v Speaker 2>already happens now once again by seeing younger generations already

0:50:09.480 --> 0:50:13.719
<v Speaker 2>looking at previous generations as barbaric and how we treat

0:50:13.719 --> 0:50:14.080
<v Speaker 2>the earth.

0:50:14.160 --> 0:50:18.400
<v Speaker 1>For sure, I saw an RHS financial estimate or prediction

0:50:18.880 --> 0:50:23.400
<v Speaker 1>that the oil market will collapse this decade that we're

0:50:23.440 --> 0:50:26.040
<v Speaker 1>just based on trends, current trends now and the way

0:50:26.120 --> 0:50:29.960
<v Speaker 1>people think now that probably we won't be using oil

0:50:30.600 --> 0:50:33.520
<v Speaker 1>nearly as much in the next ten twenty years.

0:50:33.760 --> 0:50:34.360
<v Speaker 2>Very interesting.

0:50:34.560 --> 0:50:38.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, the future is interesting, Chuck, And it is the future.

0:50:38.920 --> 0:50:40.960
<v Speaker 1>As a matter of fact. It's almost twenty twenty four,

0:50:41.400 --> 0:50:43.440
<v Speaker 1>and I just want to say happy new year to everybody.

0:50:43.520 --> 0:50:47.960
<v Speaker 2>Huh, that's right, Happy new year everyone. We thank you

0:50:48.040 --> 0:50:50.479
<v Speaker 2>once again for your support. We say it all the time.

0:50:50.719 --> 0:50:52.839
<v Speaker 2>If there was no U, that would be no US.

0:50:53.760 --> 0:50:57.000
<v Speaker 2>We are always grateful that we are allowed to do

0:50:57.040 --> 0:50:58.280
<v Speaker 2>this job because you listen.

0:50:58.480 --> 0:51:01.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, thank you, and happy new year to everyone. Happy

0:51:01.160 --> 0:51:05.520
<v Speaker 1>birthday to you me Andy Birthday, Thanks Chuck, and we'll

0:51:05.560 --> 0:51:07.640
<v Speaker 1>see you guys next year. And if you want to

0:51:07.640 --> 0:51:09.480
<v Speaker 1>get in touch with this in the interim, in this

0:51:09.719 --> 0:51:12.200
<v Speaker 1>very short time left in twenty twenty three, you can

0:51:12.239 --> 0:51:16.080
<v Speaker 1>do it via email almost instantaneously. Wrap it up, spank

0:51:16.120 --> 0:51:18.279
<v Speaker 1>it on the bottom, put a sash onto this says

0:51:18.320 --> 0:51:21.680
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty four, and send it off to Stuff podcast

0:51:22.000 --> 0:51:25.840
<v Speaker 1>at iHeartRadio dot com.

0:51:26.719 --> 0:51:29.600
<v Speaker 2>Stuff you Should Know is a production of iHeartRadio. For

0:51:29.719 --> 0:51:33.880
<v Speaker 2>more podcasts my heart Radio, visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts,

0:51:34.000 --> 0:51:40.440
<v Speaker 2>or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.