WEBVTT - Cosmopolitanism feat. Andrew

0:00:01.760 --> 0:00:02.880
<v Speaker 1>Alsome Media.

0:00:05.040 --> 0:00:08.760
<v Speaker 2>Hello, and welcome to it could happen here. I'm here

0:00:09.039 --> 0:00:11.600
<v Speaker 2>to ask you if you can imagine a world where

0:00:11.760 --> 0:00:18.360
<v Speaker 2>national borders don't define our identities. This internationalist idea has

0:00:18.400 --> 0:00:23.040
<v Speaker 2>historically been known as cosmopolitanism, and it has some deep roots,

0:00:24.000 --> 0:00:28.440
<v Speaker 2>including interestingly, some connection to anarchism, and of course that's

0:00:28.440 --> 0:00:31.720
<v Speaker 2>what we're seeking to explore here today. I'm joined once

0:00:31.800 --> 0:00:33.080
<v Speaker 2>again by the one and only.

0:00:33.880 --> 0:00:36.959
<v Speaker 3>It's James James Stout. Thanks for having me, Andrew, I'm

0:00:36.960 --> 0:00:37.880
<v Speaker 3>excited about this one.

0:00:38.640 --> 0:00:40.800
<v Speaker 2>Thank you for having me. I'm really excited to have

0:00:40.840 --> 0:00:44.160
<v Speaker 2>this conversation. Are you familiar with cosmopolitanism?

0:00:44.400 --> 0:00:47.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and like, look, if there gets a more broad

0:00:47.760 --> 0:00:52.199
<v Speaker 3>sphere of like anarchist internationalism, it is something I'm very

0:00:52.240 --> 0:00:54.280
<v Speaker 3>interested in, right, Like, we had an interview on the

0:00:54.360 --> 0:00:57.120
<v Speaker 3>show maybe two weeks ago, for a few weeks ago,

0:00:57.120 --> 0:01:01.520
<v Speaker 3>and people hear this with people explicitly calling internationalists fighting

0:01:01.520 --> 0:01:04.559
<v Speaker 3>in Myanmar. Of course, I've spent time in re Java

0:01:04.760 --> 0:01:08.400
<v Speaker 3>and with internationalists there, so like internationalism is something I'm

0:01:08.440 --> 0:01:10.040
<v Speaker 3>really interested in for sure.

0:01:10.200 --> 0:01:14.119
<v Speaker 2>For sure, I think it's a very compelling and inspiring idea,

0:01:14.480 --> 0:01:17.840
<v Speaker 2>especially in a world that lacks many of those ideas.

0:01:18.200 --> 0:01:21.360
<v Speaker 2>At its core, cosmopolitanism is just the belief that all

0:01:21.440 --> 0:01:24.959
<v Speaker 2>human beings belong to the same shared moral and political

0:01:24.959 --> 0:01:30.440
<v Speaker 2>community that transcends national, cultural, and political boundaries. In the

0:01:30.440 --> 0:01:35.080
<v Speaker 2>book Cosmopolitanism, Ethics and the Wilders Strangers, philosopher Kwame Anthony

0:01:35.120 --> 0:01:40.520
<v Speaker 2>Appia describes cosmopolitanism as quote two strands that intertwine in

0:01:40.560 --> 0:01:43.440
<v Speaker 2>the notion of cosmopolitanism. One is the idea that we

0:01:43.480 --> 0:01:46.720
<v Speaker 2>have obligations to others, obligations that stretch beyond those to

0:01:46.760 --> 0:01:48.760
<v Speaker 2>whom we are related by the ties of kith and kin,

0:01:49.280 --> 0:01:52.720
<v Speaker 2>or even the more formal ties of shared citizenship. The

0:01:52.800 --> 0:01:55.120
<v Speaker 2>other is that we take seriously the value not just

0:01:55.200 --> 0:01:58.360
<v Speaker 2>of human life, but of particular human lives, which means

0:01:58.400 --> 0:02:00.320
<v Speaker 2>taken an interest in the practices and believe at land

0:02:00.320 --> 0:02:05.280
<v Speaker 2>them significance. People are different, the Costopolitan knows, and there's

0:02:05.360 --> 0:02:08.079
<v Speaker 2>much to learn from our differences. Because there are so

0:02:08.160 --> 0:02:11.960
<v Speaker 2>many human possibilities worth exploring. We neither expect nor desire

0:02:12.000 --> 0:02:14.960
<v Speaker 2>that every person or every society should converge on a

0:02:15.000 --> 0:02:18.640
<v Speaker 2>single mode of life. Whatever obligations are to others or

0:02:18.680 --> 0:02:21.120
<v Speaker 2>theirs to us, they often have the rights to go

0:02:21.320 --> 0:02:25.760
<v Speaker 2>their own way, so basically, we have obligations to others

0:02:25.800 --> 0:02:29.480
<v Speaker 2>beyond just our immediate affiliations, and that human diversity is

0:02:29.520 --> 0:02:32.640
<v Speaker 2>something to be valued, not just tolerated. So it's not

0:02:32.720 --> 0:02:38.560
<v Speaker 2>the idea of assimilating all of humanity into one singular

0:02:38.639 --> 0:02:42.960
<v Speaker 2>culture or society or government. Is the idea of recognizing

0:02:42.960 --> 0:02:47.840
<v Speaker 2>and embracing the diversity of humans, but recognizing our shared

0:02:47.840 --> 0:02:51.600
<v Speaker 2>affinity all the same. There are a couple of different

0:02:51.720 --> 0:02:56.200
<v Speaker 2>versions of cosmopolitanism. There's moral cosmopolitanism, or the idea that

0:02:56.240 --> 0:03:00.200
<v Speaker 2>all humans have equal moral worth. There's political cosmopolitanism, the

0:03:00.240 --> 0:03:04.919
<v Speaker 2>idea that global governance or international institutions should supersede national borders.

0:03:05.400 --> 0:03:08.120
<v Speaker 2>And then there's cultural cosmopolitanism, which is the blending in

0:03:08.160 --> 0:03:12.280
<v Speaker 2>exchange of cultures through migration, trade, and shared histories. But

0:03:12.320 --> 0:03:17.040
<v Speaker 2>cosmopolitanism fully embraced has I would say an inherent tens

0:03:17.080 --> 0:03:21.639
<v Speaker 2>with power, especially nationalism, the states, and capitalism. And while

0:03:21.639 --> 0:03:25.480
<v Speaker 2>it's true that liberal cosmopolitanism relies on global institutions like

0:03:25.520 --> 0:03:31.320
<v Speaker 2>the United Nations and reinforces hierarchies, anarchist cosmopolitanism envisions a

0:03:31.360 --> 0:03:36.760
<v Speaker 2>world where solidarity, cooperation, and mutual aid emerge from below

0:03:37.240 --> 0:03:41.640
<v Speaker 2>through free association, rather than being imposed from above. So

0:03:41.680 --> 0:03:45.480
<v Speaker 2>today we'll be unpacking the history of cosmopolitanism, how anarchists

0:03:45.520 --> 0:03:49.360
<v Speaker 2>have engaged with the topic, and why it remains somewhat

0:03:49.360 --> 0:03:54.040
<v Speaker 2>of a battleground today. Yes, the term itself comes from

0:03:54.120 --> 0:03:59.560
<v Speaker 2>the Greek cosmopolities, which means citizen of the world. The

0:03:59.600 --> 0:04:03.480
<v Speaker 2>earliest particulation of this idea is often attributed to Diogenes

0:04:03.640 --> 0:04:07.840
<v Speaker 2>of Sinope, who is a Synic philosopher who, when asked

0:04:07.840 --> 0:04:10.960
<v Speaker 2>where he came from, simply replied, I'm a citizen of

0:04:11.000 --> 0:04:16.240
<v Speaker 2>the world. According to Martha Nusbaum, Greek stoics like Xeno

0:04:16.279 --> 0:04:20.000
<v Speaker 2>of Citium, Seneca, and Marcus Aurelius expanded on this idea,

0:04:20.520 --> 0:04:23.720
<v Speaker 2>arguing that humanity shares a universal reason and should live

0:04:23.720 --> 0:04:27.880
<v Speaker 2>in accordance with nature, not artificial divisions of state or tribe.

0:04:28.440 --> 0:04:30.400
<v Speaker 2>Of course, many of these philosophers didn't have any issue

0:04:30.440 --> 0:04:34.880
<v Speaker 2>with patriarchy or slavery in Greece, so there is some

0:04:35.000 --> 0:04:38.240
<v Speaker 2>inconsistency in their concept of a shared humanity.

0:04:38.360 --> 0:04:41.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, the two counts as human I guess, isn't it like?

0:04:41.800 --> 0:04:43.080
<v Speaker 3>Which is pretty bleak.

0:04:43.000 --> 0:04:47.039
<v Speaker 2>Indeed, But let's pass forward a bit. During the Enlightenment

0:04:47.120 --> 0:04:51.080
<v Speaker 2>we see a more structured political philosophy of cosmopolitanism. Emergent

0:04:51.720 --> 0:04:55.560
<v Speaker 2>Emanuel Kant was one of its most famous proponents. In

0:04:55.600 --> 0:05:01.040
<v Speaker 2>the book Perpetual Piece, Can't imagine a cosmopolitan condition where individuals,

0:05:01.200 --> 0:05:04.560
<v Speaker 2>not just states, had universal rights and where a global

0:05:04.600 --> 0:05:08.919
<v Speaker 2>federation of free republics would ensure peace and cooperation. However,

0:05:09.279 --> 0:05:12.680
<v Speaker 2>his version of cosson Politanism still relied on legal structures

0:05:12.880 --> 0:05:17.000
<v Speaker 2>and state based governance. Another Nightman thinker associated with cosmopolitanism

0:05:17.200 --> 0:05:21.160
<v Speaker 2>was Dni Dederu, who criticized colonialism and argued for a

0:05:21.200 --> 0:05:25.040
<v Speaker 2>cultural exchange free from that kind of domination. He also

0:05:25.120 --> 0:05:29.320
<v Speaker 2>argued against monarchy, the church, and aristocratic privileges, as they

0:05:29.320 --> 0:05:33.160
<v Speaker 2>were obstacles to a truly free and universal human community,

0:05:33.760 --> 0:05:37.000
<v Speaker 2>which then brings us to the French Revolution, which brought

0:05:37.000 --> 0:05:41.239
<v Speaker 2>these ideas into the real world. Revolutionaries declared the Rights

0:05:41.240 --> 0:05:44.640
<v Speaker 2>of Man and of the Citizen, which proclaims universal rights

0:05:44.640 --> 0:05:48.479
<v Speaker 2>beyond national or social status, but the revolution soon became

0:05:48.640 --> 0:05:53.320
<v Speaker 2>entangled with nationalism, particularly under the Acabins, who suppressed dissent

0:05:53.760 --> 0:05:57.719
<v Speaker 2>and waged wars in the name of France. Meanwhile, the

0:05:57.760 --> 0:06:01.320
<v Speaker 2>Haitian Revolution provided a different example of liberation. In practice,

0:06:01.960 --> 0:06:06.200
<v Speaker 2>enslaved Africans, inspired by the French Revolution's rhetoric of liberty inequality,

0:06:06.839 --> 0:06:10.520
<v Speaker 2>revolted against French colonial rule and established the first free

0:06:10.560 --> 0:06:15.200
<v Speaker 2>Black republic. The revolutionaries, led by to Saint Levitire, argued

0:06:15.200 --> 0:06:19.159
<v Speaker 2>that liberty was a universal human right, not one limited

0:06:19.160 --> 0:06:22.919
<v Speaker 2>to European citizens, and declared Haiti a refuge to all

0:06:23.000 --> 0:06:28.240
<v Speaker 2>enslaved persons. But despite its radical implications, the Haitian Revolution

0:06:28.440 --> 0:06:33.400
<v Speaker 2>was largely ignored or outright opposed by European powers. Their

0:06:33.520 --> 0:06:38.000
<v Speaker 2>so called enlightenment only extended to Europe, ignoring our racial

0:06:38.080 --> 0:06:51.560
<v Speaker 2>and colonial realities. We also see in this time the

0:06:51.600 --> 0:06:55.359
<v Speaker 2>emergence of nationalism, which on the one hand promoted self

0:06:55.360 --> 0:06:59.440
<v Speaker 2>determination for omopressed nations, but on the other hand saw

0:06:59.480 --> 0:07:03.440
<v Speaker 2>the nations state as a superior form of political organization.

0:07:04.360 --> 0:07:08.400
<v Speaker 2>So anarchists were among the earliest critics of nationalism. Patrons

0:07:08.440 --> 0:07:11.240
<v Speaker 2>of Pradawn, for instance, rejected both the nation state and

0:07:11.440 --> 0:07:17.600
<v Speaker 2>centralized cosmopolitan governance, instead advocating for federation, a frequently misunderstood

0:07:17.600 --> 0:07:22.160
<v Speaker 2>concept that refers in anarchist literature to a decentralized network

0:07:22.360 --> 0:07:27.920
<v Speaker 2>of freely associated individuals and groups working in solidarity. Similarly,

0:07:28.200 --> 0:07:32.200
<v Speaker 2>Mikhil Bcunen attacked nationalism as a tool of ruling elites,

0:07:32.800 --> 0:07:35.760
<v Speaker 2>arguing that states used national identities of press, class struggle,

0:07:35.960 --> 0:07:40.280
<v Speaker 2>and international solidarity. Bi Cunin did back national liberation movements,

0:07:40.560 --> 0:07:44.280
<v Speaker 2>but he understood the danger of nationalism as a force

0:07:44.320 --> 0:07:49.920
<v Speaker 2>that often replaces foreign rulers with homegrown oppressors. Instead, Bercunen

0:07:50.000 --> 0:07:55.720
<v Speaker 2>promoted anarchist internationalism, where workers and oppressed peoples across borders

0:07:55.920 --> 0:07:59.960
<v Speaker 2>would unite against both capitalists and state powers. By contrast,

0:08:00.040 --> 0:08:03.040
<v Speaker 2>the Bolsheviks would eventually developed the idea of socialism in

0:08:03.080 --> 0:08:06.920
<v Speaker 2>one country, and the ever paranoid Stalin would famously deride

0:08:07.120 --> 0:08:13.440
<v Speaker 2>Jewish intellectuals as quote rootless cosmopolitans. This, of course aligned

0:08:13.520 --> 0:08:16.960
<v Speaker 2>him with the rest of Europe's nationalists in their anti semitism,

0:08:17.440 --> 0:08:21.600
<v Speaker 2>inaccurate cricketerization of cosmopolitanism as opposed to cultural identity or

0:08:21.600 --> 0:08:26.800
<v Speaker 2>sovereignty and ramid defense of national borders. Honestly, I would

0:08:26.880 --> 0:08:30.200
<v Speaker 2>not be surprised if Trump or Putin used some equivalent

0:08:30.560 --> 0:08:32.760
<v Speaker 2>to rule less cosmopolitanism today.

0:08:33.200 --> 0:08:36.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, I did see. It was like a pro

0:08:36.840 --> 0:08:40.960
<v Speaker 3>tramp account. I guess constantly or unconstantly paraphrasing Stalin.

0:08:40.720 --> 0:08:42.160
<v Speaker 4>This week, so that was great.

0:08:42.559 --> 0:08:45.920
<v Speaker 3>Really well, they say it's like, how many divisions does

0:08:45.960 --> 0:08:49.600
<v Speaker 3>the judge command? Which is a I think there might

0:08:49.640 --> 0:08:51.720
<v Speaker 3>be a quote from Stalin if it's not quote to paraphrase, right,

0:08:51.760 --> 0:08:55.040
<v Speaker 3>But in this case, it's a reference to the attempts

0:08:55.080 --> 0:08:57.920
<v Speaker 3>by a district court judge in GC to block the

0:08:57.920 --> 0:09:01.200
<v Speaker 3>rendition of people to US ale were accused of being

0:09:01.280 --> 0:09:07.959
<v Speaker 3>members of various gangs and Miroslature being the two main ones.

0:09:08.720 --> 0:09:11.960
<v Speaker 2>Yes, so just being expelled. What's the connection to Stalin?

0:09:12.000 --> 0:09:12.200
<v Speaker 4>Though?

0:09:12.840 --> 0:09:16.679
<v Speaker 3>The quote how many divisions does the judge command? Let me,

0:09:17.280 --> 0:09:20.200
<v Speaker 3>I'm pretty sure how many divisions does the pope command?

0:09:20.320 --> 0:09:23.520
<v Speaker 3>Was the starting quite, that's right. So like it's referencing

0:09:23.559 --> 0:09:26.280
<v Speaker 3>this idea that like might makes right and like that,

0:09:26.440 --> 0:09:28.120
<v Speaker 3>you know, if you have the bar of the state,

0:09:28.160 --> 0:09:33.760
<v Speaker 3>then you're not accountable to morally or even even within

0:09:33.840 --> 0:09:37.760
<v Speaker 3>the confines of the state, like separation of powers that

0:09:37.760 --> 0:09:39.920
<v Speaker 3>we're supposed to happen in the US, right, Like if

0:09:39.920 --> 0:09:42.880
<v Speaker 3>you have the monopoly on coercive violence and you're no

0:09:42.960 --> 0:09:45.640
<v Speaker 3>longer constrained by those things.

0:09:45.480 --> 0:09:51.000
<v Speaker 2>Right, yeah, I see, I see. So of course, Alec,

0:09:51.000 --> 0:09:53.520
<v Speaker 2>I suppose all those things they appouse. What is happening now,

0:09:53.559 --> 0:09:56.120
<v Speaker 2>and they oppose what was happening then, you know. From

0:09:56.120 --> 0:10:00.520
<v Speaker 2>its inception, anarchism has been an internationalist movement, rejecting the

0:10:00.600 --> 0:10:04.960
<v Speaker 2>artificial borders imposed by state and champion in global solidarity.

0:10:06.280 --> 0:10:10.319
<v Speaker 2>Unlike Marxist internationalism, which has often relied on the centralized

0:10:10.360 --> 0:10:16.199
<v Speaker 2>structures of the first, second, or Third internationals, anarchists emphasized decentralized,

0:10:16.240 --> 0:10:20.720
<v Speaker 2>horizontal networks of struggle that connected workers, revolutionaries, and stateless

0:10:20.760 --> 0:10:26.520
<v Speaker 2>peoples across continents. The anarchist Saint Emer Internationale, which ran

0:10:26.559 --> 0:10:30.000
<v Speaker 2>from eighteen seventy two to eighteen seventy seven, was one

0:10:30.040 --> 0:10:33.040
<v Speaker 2>such network. As discussed by Lucian van der Waldt and

0:10:33.120 --> 0:10:39.360
<v Speaker 2>Schmidt in Black Flame, that group explicitly rejected nationalism and

0:10:39.440 --> 0:10:44.640
<v Speaker 2>state power, and throughout history anarchists worked a bridge linguistic, cultural,

0:10:44.720 --> 0:10:48.839
<v Speaker 2>and national divides from multi lingual anarchist newspapers in the

0:10:48.880 --> 0:10:53.240
<v Speaker 2>nineteenth and twentieth centuries such as Laprotester Argentina, der Camp

0:10:53.360 --> 0:10:58.040
<v Speaker 2>in Germany and The Libertaire in France, through transnational cynicalist

0:10:58.080 --> 0:11:00.680
<v Speaker 2>movements like the Industrial Workers of the World World, which

0:11:00.720 --> 0:11:03.600
<v Speaker 2>organized workers across race, nationality, and language. In the early

0:11:03.640 --> 0:11:08.280
<v Speaker 2>twentieth century and including contemporary mutual aid networks where anarchists

0:11:08.280 --> 0:11:13.080
<v Speaker 2>coordinates across borders to support refugees, disaster relief, and addigenous

0:11:13.160 --> 0:11:18.280
<v Speaker 2>land struggles. Anarchist networks, contrary to popular belief, often extended

0:11:18.360 --> 0:11:22.640
<v Speaker 2>beyond Europe into North Africa, Asia and Latin America, where

0:11:22.679 --> 0:11:26.679
<v Speaker 2>anti colonial and labor struggles intertwined with anarchist thought. If

0:11:26.679 --> 0:11:28.960
<v Speaker 2>you're curious, by the way, about the anarchist histories of

0:11:29.000 --> 0:11:31.439
<v Speaker 2>Egypt or the rest of Latin America, they could check

0:11:31.440 --> 0:11:34.000
<v Speaker 2>out my series on it right here on the canappen

0:11:34.000 --> 0:11:37.320
<v Speaker 2>Air podcast. And if you've listened to that series, you'll

0:11:37.360 --> 0:11:41.520
<v Speaker 2>know that because anarchists were constantly persecuted, exile became a

0:11:41.600 --> 0:11:47.200
<v Speaker 2>defining experience which further reinforced the internationalism. Folks like Michail

0:11:47.200 --> 0:11:51.920
<v Speaker 2>Bi Cunan, Pieter Kropotkin, and Erikomana Testa moved across continents,

0:11:52.240 --> 0:11:56.520
<v Speaker 2>spreading anarchist ideas and connecting struggles. Myl test in particular,

0:11:56.800 --> 0:11:59.800
<v Speaker 2>was basically a common San Diego. You know, he touched

0:12:00.240 --> 0:12:04.280
<v Speaker 2>multiple continents over the course of his life. So boyut

0:12:04.280 --> 0:12:07.200
<v Speaker 2>the late nineteenth century anarchists like Groulph Rocker developed an

0:12:07.240 --> 0:12:12.120
<v Speaker 2>alternative to both statist nationalism and liberal cosmopolitanism, which sorts

0:12:12.120 --> 0:12:16.319
<v Speaker 2>of balance cultural diversity with global solidarity from below. Rocker

0:12:16.440 --> 0:12:18.800
<v Speaker 2>argued that people should be free to maintain their cultural

0:12:18.800 --> 0:12:23.600
<v Speaker 2>traditions without being bound to the state or nationalist identity.

0:12:23.800 --> 0:12:27.439
<v Speaker 2>So liberal costopolitanism was pushing a global order through state

0:12:27.480 --> 0:12:32.360
<v Speaker 2>led interventions, international institutions, and legal frameworks. And while this

0:12:32.480 --> 0:12:35.280
<v Speaker 2>form of costopolitanism has led to some games on people

0:12:35.440 --> 0:12:40.719
<v Speaker 2>in human rights, international refugee protections, and anti genocide treaties, well,

0:12:40.800 --> 0:12:42.880
<v Speaker 2>for one, we see the failures of these institutions and

0:12:42.960 --> 0:12:47.160
<v Speaker 2>practice daily, and for two, they ultimately reinforced the state

0:12:47.240 --> 0:12:49.920
<v Speaker 2>power that creates so much harm, rather than dismantling it.

0:12:50.920 --> 0:12:53.720
<v Speaker 2>The UN and the WTO often uphold the interest of

0:12:53.760 --> 0:12:57.440
<v Speaker 2>powerful states above and before the international laws and obligations,

0:12:57.679 --> 0:13:02.200
<v Speaker 2>whilst sidelining grassroots movements. While liberal costopolitanism sits on its

0:13:02.240 --> 0:13:06.000
<v Speaker 2>hands waiting for elit driven reforms to the system, anarchists

0:13:06.000 --> 0:13:09.800
<v Speaker 2>engage in direct action to support migrants and other marginalized

0:13:09.800 --> 0:13:13.200
<v Speaker 2>folks without waiting for such reform. I have to give

0:13:13.240 --> 0:13:14.960
<v Speaker 2>a shout out here, of course, to the No Borders

0:13:15.040 --> 0:13:17.840
<v Speaker 2>network and also a shout out to the work that

0:13:17.920 --> 0:13:20.400
<v Speaker 2>you do, James on the side.

0:13:20.280 --> 0:13:20.920
<v Speaker 3>Thank you. Yeah.

0:13:21.000 --> 0:13:23.000
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I've see a lot more people than me doing

0:13:23.000 --> 0:13:24.040
<v Speaker 4>it of course.

0:13:25.280 --> 0:13:29.520
<v Speaker 2>So the sad part is, even if it started with

0:13:29.640 --> 0:13:34.160
<v Speaker 2>some noble ideal, the concept of liberal cost of Politanism

0:13:34.240 --> 0:13:38.760
<v Speaker 2>today doesn't so much manifest in the freedom of people,

0:13:39.800 --> 0:13:43.280
<v Speaker 2>but moreso in the freedom of markets and money, the

0:13:43.280 --> 0:13:47.280
<v Speaker 2>globalization of markets and money. So we will bring McDonald's

0:13:47.400 --> 0:13:51.520
<v Speaker 2>Netflix to your country, but you can't come to our country,

0:13:51.640 --> 0:13:52.320
<v Speaker 2>or will kill you.

0:13:52.880 --> 0:14:04.640
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, that's about it.

0:14:04.640 --> 0:14:07.920
<v Speaker 3>It was really interesting to like the moment I sort

0:14:07.920 --> 0:14:10.360
<v Speaker 3>of became aware of libertarian left politics was in the

0:14:10.400 --> 0:14:13.840
<v Speaker 3>early two thousands in the context of the movement against

0:14:13.840 --> 0:14:18.000
<v Speaker 3>like the g eight as it was then and at

0:14:18.000 --> 0:14:21.040
<v Speaker 3>the time it would be referred to in the legacy

0:14:21.080 --> 0:14:24.360
<v Speaker 3>media as like anti globalization right, which I don't think

0:14:24.360 --> 0:14:26.720
<v Speaker 3>it ever was right by definition. I think it was

0:14:26.800 --> 0:14:28.800
<v Speaker 3>very global, Like you had people from all around the

0:14:28.800 --> 0:14:32.360
<v Speaker 3>world tending these protests and rallies and speeches as such,

0:14:32.760 --> 0:14:35.160
<v Speaker 3>Like it was a very global movement. The problem was

0:14:35.200 --> 0:14:39.320
<v Speaker 3>not with globalization Costopolitanism internationalism. It was with the nature

0:14:39.440 --> 0:14:42.960
<v Speaker 3>of neoliberal capitalist globalization, which let capital move and stop

0:14:43.000 --> 0:14:43.760
<v Speaker 3>people from moving.

0:14:43.960 --> 0:14:49.360
<v Speaker 2>Exactly. It's some old opposition sugg as the free reign

0:14:49.400 --> 0:14:51.240
<v Speaker 2>of exploitas across the globe.

0:14:51.520 --> 0:14:52.240
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, exactly.

0:14:52.280 --> 0:14:56.120
<v Speaker 3>We let people take their money and employ people at

0:14:56.160 --> 0:14:59.000
<v Speaker 3>lower wages, but God forbid those people ever want better

0:14:59.040 --> 0:15:01.520
<v Speaker 3>for themselves, or to come somewhere where they can materially

0:15:01.560 --> 0:15:04.320
<v Speaker 3>benefit themselves doing the same labor in a different nation,

0:15:04.480 --> 0:15:05.000
<v Speaker 3>for instance.

0:15:05.360 --> 0:15:07.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. And to be honest with you, I've never really

0:15:07.800 --> 0:15:12.440
<v Speaker 2>been a respect of borders. I think they're just I

0:15:12.440 --> 0:15:17.480
<v Speaker 2>think they are really really blatantly foolish imposition. I don't

0:15:17.480 --> 0:15:20.000
<v Speaker 2>even think you need to be a radical to see

0:15:20.320 --> 0:15:25.000
<v Speaker 2>the issue with this idea that your one point has

0:15:25.040 --> 0:15:29.440
<v Speaker 2>to determine your entire future. Yeah, that some people in

0:15:29.520 --> 0:15:32.960
<v Speaker 2>the past could cut up the earth and then decide

0:15:33.440 --> 0:15:35.080
<v Speaker 2>where you can roam freely.

0:15:35.760 --> 0:15:38.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think anyone. I see a lot more from

0:15:38.680 --> 0:15:40.920
<v Speaker 3>people who are not by any means radical or even

0:15:41.000 --> 0:15:44.400
<v Speaker 3>on the left, like this, like within Europe, right within

0:15:44.440 --> 0:15:47.480
<v Speaker 3>the Shanngen area, which the UK has decided to remove

0:15:47.480 --> 0:15:50.600
<v Speaker 3>itself from for reasons that are largely racism.

0:15:51.120 --> 0:15:52.160
<v Speaker 4>Like we could move freely.

0:15:52.200 --> 0:15:56.200
<v Speaker 3>When I grew up, my identity and experience was much

0:15:56.240 --> 0:15:59.440
<v Speaker 3>more European than necessarily British. Right, I could go for

0:15:59.520 --> 0:16:02.000
<v Speaker 3>the weekend to Spain if I wanted to, or France

0:16:02.080 --> 0:16:03.400
<v Speaker 3>and flights were cheap then.

0:16:03.720 --> 0:16:04.120
<v Speaker 4>So it did.

0:16:04.560 --> 0:16:06.920
<v Speaker 3>Like I used to get on Friday night, take a

0:16:06.960 --> 0:16:09.080
<v Speaker 3>train to Belgium, raise my bike in Belgium and come

0:16:09.120 --> 0:16:12.280
<v Speaker 3>back on Sunday night, very very often, and like you

0:16:12.320 --> 0:16:14.960
<v Speaker 3>see it here too in San Diego, where like the

0:16:15.000 --> 0:16:18.560
<v Speaker 3>border is just a line and a delay. But for

0:16:18.680 --> 0:16:23.040
<v Speaker 3>most people, like we were a very binational community. Unfortunately,

0:16:23.160 --> 0:16:26.320
<v Speaker 3>the one way that that manifests itself is that the

0:16:26.360 --> 0:16:29.080
<v Speaker 3>cost of living in San Diego compares the average wage

0:16:29.320 --> 0:16:33.320
<v Speaker 3>is vastly disparate because we have this over pressure valve

0:16:33.400 --> 0:16:35.320
<v Speaker 3>where like people can't afford it here, they can live

0:16:35.320 --> 0:16:37.320
<v Speaker 3>across the border where the cost of living is cheaper,

0:16:37.400 --> 0:16:41.280
<v Speaker 3>and that allows people to exploit working class people in

0:16:41.360 --> 0:16:43.000
<v Speaker 3>both contexts sadly. Right.

0:16:43.840 --> 0:16:46.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, as you mentioned the UK, by the way, I'm

0:16:46.200 --> 0:16:49.000
<v Speaker 2>not sure if you've heard the news, but Trenidad has

0:16:49.080 --> 0:16:57.040
<v Speaker 2>recently been imposed visa requirements by the UK for fuck's sake. Yeah, really,

0:16:58.120 --> 0:17:01.680
<v Speaker 2>thankfully we still have shanngin area access. Yeah, but just

0:17:01.760 --> 0:17:05.200
<v Speaker 2>recently the UK was like due to Yeah, the usual

0:17:05.240 --> 0:17:10.520
<v Speaker 2>excuse people are using the asylum seeking system that they're

0:17:10.560 --> 0:17:14.600
<v Speaker 2>not removed our visa exemption, so our colonizers have now

0:17:14.680 --> 0:17:18.359
<v Speaker 2>decided that, you know, we don't want you to move

0:17:18.359 --> 0:17:20.400
<v Speaker 2>free in our country. We want you to pay. And

0:17:21.000 --> 0:17:23.320
<v Speaker 2>visas are not cheap theyan ever cheap, especially when there's

0:17:23.320 --> 0:17:26.680
<v Speaker 2>no guarantee, no other than being accepted. Yep, it makes

0:17:26.680 --> 0:17:28.719
<v Speaker 2>it all the more frustrating.

0:17:29.280 --> 0:17:32.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and like this just comes after the British government

0:17:32.760 --> 0:17:36.879
<v Speaker 3>attempting to deport Africribbean migrant Kames, part of what we

0:17:36.920 --> 0:17:39.800
<v Speaker 3>call the wind rush generation, which is just one of

0:17:39.840 --> 0:17:43.800
<v Speaker 3>the most disgusting and like, yeah, it just just wanted

0:17:43.880 --> 0:17:45.560
<v Speaker 3>one of the most venal and pathetic things I've ever

0:17:45.600 --> 0:17:47.760
<v Speaker 3>seen a government do, Like these people who the UK

0:17:47.920 --> 0:17:50.440
<v Speaker 3>asked to come so that it could rebuild this economy

0:17:50.440 --> 0:17:53.240
<v Speaker 3>after the Second World War, and then taking advantage of

0:17:53.280 --> 0:17:55.120
<v Speaker 3>the fact that at that time there was no process

0:17:55.160 --> 0:17:57.760
<v Speaker 3>for regularitation and then trying to deport these people who

0:17:57.800 --> 0:17:59.120
<v Speaker 3>have lived their whole lives in the UK.

0:17:59.160 --> 0:18:00.520
<v Speaker 4>It's just horrific.

0:18:00.880 --> 0:18:05.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it is. It's horrific, it's frustrating, it's infury, it's

0:18:05.800 --> 0:18:06.680
<v Speaker 2>in really Yeah.

0:18:06.760 --> 0:18:09.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it makes me really angry, like if we didn't

0:18:09.040 --> 0:18:12.080
<v Speaker 3>have a wind Rewst generation not that like you need

0:18:12.119 --> 0:18:14.359
<v Speaker 3>like popular music to justify their existence as part of

0:18:14.359 --> 0:18:15.960
<v Speaker 3>our community, and they should be able to stay. But

0:18:16.200 --> 0:18:18.679
<v Speaker 3>we wouldn't have punk music if if we wouldn't have

0:18:19.160 --> 0:18:21.600
<v Speaker 3>scar music. We like so much of what is like

0:18:21.680 --> 0:18:26.720
<v Speaker 3>integral to even like quote unquote British culture. It actually

0:18:26.760 --> 0:18:29.680
<v Speaker 3>came from these people because they are British and they

0:18:30.359 --> 0:18:31.040
<v Speaker 3>belong there just.

0:18:30.960 --> 0:18:31.960
<v Speaker 4>As much as anyone else.

0:18:32.280 --> 0:18:33.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:18:33.480 --> 0:18:35.520
<v Speaker 3>I used to teach a class about music and colonial

0:18:35.520 --> 0:18:37.920
<v Speaker 3>culture and colonialism, which is why that comes to mind.

0:18:38.119 --> 0:18:41.800
<v Speaker 2>I actually missed an opportunity to go to the UK

0:18:42.720 --> 0:18:45.800
<v Speaker 2>earlier this year. I didn't want to pay the cost

0:18:46.080 --> 0:18:50.399
<v Speaker 2>to fly to go at that point in time. I

0:18:50.440 --> 0:18:52.640
<v Speaker 2>know I deeply regrets it because I'm like I could

0:18:52.680 --> 0:18:56.119
<v Speaker 2>have gone. Honestly, I think if you're the UK and

0:18:56.160 --> 0:19:00.159
<v Speaker 2>your your country has still learn so much, like I

0:19:00.160 --> 0:19:05.640
<v Speaker 2>think the UK has the least right or justification out

0:19:05.680 --> 0:19:09.240
<v Speaker 2>of any country if you had to concede that a

0:19:09.240 --> 0:19:11.040
<v Speaker 2>country should be lost, I don't. I don't give any

0:19:11.040 --> 0:19:14.359
<v Speaker 2>country that concession, but if you had to give that concession,

0:19:14.840 --> 0:19:17.040
<v Speaker 2>you could be last to receive that concession as far

0:19:17.080 --> 0:19:18.920
<v Speaker 2>as I'm concerned. You don't get to go on roam

0:19:18.960 --> 0:19:22.240
<v Speaker 2>across the entire planet and then shut yourself off. Yeah,

0:19:22.320 --> 0:19:24.200
<v Speaker 2>you don't get to go on steel and pill fall

0:19:24.200 --> 0:19:27.320
<v Speaker 2>from across the world, shuffle it all into your national

0:19:27.400 --> 0:19:31.000
<v Speaker 2>museum and then block people from access it.

0:19:31.560 --> 0:19:31.800
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:19:31.880 --> 0:19:34.520
<v Speaker 3>It is just like it's just the most clear and

0:19:34.600 --> 0:19:39.080
<v Speaker 3>pathetic like two level standard or whatever, and it's I mean,

0:19:39.119 --> 0:19:41.640
<v Speaker 3>the UK has a very I'm sorry you didn't get

0:19:41.640 --> 0:19:43.800
<v Speaker 3>to visit in one sense, and I'm sure we have

0:19:43.840 --> 0:19:45.480
<v Speaker 3>lots of listeners who are in the UK. Every time

0:19:45.480 --> 0:19:48.560
<v Speaker 3>I'm home, I feel this like profound sense of like

0:19:48.680 --> 0:19:52.800
<v Speaker 3>post colonial melancholy that the UK it's just sort of

0:19:53.160 --> 0:19:54.760
<v Speaker 3>it's getting worse and worse and worse.

0:19:54.920 --> 0:19:56.480
<v Speaker 4>And the way.

0:19:56.440 --> 0:20:00.159
<v Speaker 3>Britain is responding is with our government blaming everyone one

0:20:00.240 --> 0:20:01.159
<v Speaker 3>else and.

0:20:02.040 --> 0:20:04.720
<v Speaker 2>Like trying to strip posterity.

0:20:04.920 --> 0:20:09.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, like stealing everything they can just mess Yeah.

0:20:09.200 --> 0:20:11.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think frustration for me as well as that

0:20:12.000 --> 0:20:15.000
<v Speaker 2>it's not to watch the country itself, although I would

0:20:15.040 --> 0:20:18.280
<v Speaker 2>have loved to have visited like Scotland and you know,

0:20:18.359 --> 0:20:21.600
<v Speaker 2>Whels and that kind of thing, but and all the

0:20:21.600 --> 0:20:24.600
<v Speaker 2>stuff there is to see in London. But The biggest

0:20:24.600 --> 0:20:27.600
<v Speaker 2>frustration for me is that it's a it's a connection point.

0:20:28.080 --> 0:20:30.000
<v Speaker 2>You know, when you impose a visa like that, you

0:20:30.680 --> 0:20:33.040
<v Speaker 2>block people's connections other areas. One of the few direct

0:20:33.080 --> 0:20:39.760
<v Speaker 2>flights outside of this hemisphere, you know, to the European

0:20:39.800 --> 0:20:42.840
<v Speaker 2>and African hemisphere is through a flight to the UK.

0:20:43.040 --> 0:20:45.720
<v Speaker 2>And so by adding that in position, it's like it's

0:20:45.760 --> 0:20:48.080
<v Speaker 2>like the world feels like it's being closed.

0:20:48.359 --> 0:20:48.879
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:20:49.000 --> 0:20:49.840
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, you can see that.

0:20:49.960 --> 0:20:52.600
<v Speaker 2>One more where there was almost a time in the

0:20:52.640 --> 0:20:54.919
<v Speaker 2>recent past where it felt like or the world was

0:20:54.960 --> 0:20:57.919
<v Speaker 2>opening up to people, you know, with the Internet, the

0:20:57.960 --> 0:21:00.199
<v Speaker 2>rise of the Internet, and then you had, you know,

0:21:00.280 --> 0:21:04.119
<v Speaker 2>the introduction of things like the Shangan Agreement. Our access

0:21:04.160 --> 0:21:06.760
<v Speaker 2>the Shangan area was reairly recent I think it was

0:21:06.800 --> 0:21:09.959
<v Speaker 2>twenty fifteen we got that access. Yeah, okay, But to

0:21:10.000 --> 0:21:12.000
<v Speaker 2>go from that point in to like just so quickly,

0:21:12.119 --> 0:21:16.199
<v Speaker 2>you know, the tied shifts. So now there's extremely hostile

0:21:17.359 --> 0:21:21.800
<v Speaker 2>global order towards something as fundamental as the movement of people.

0:21:22.359 --> 0:21:24.320
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it's it definitely.

0:21:24.359 --> 0:21:27.280
<v Speaker 3>We definitely are entering it in like an era where

0:21:27.840 --> 0:21:32.359
<v Speaker 3>things are becoming more closed off again than many of

0:21:32.440 --> 0:21:34.000
<v Speaker 3>us grew up with, right, many of us you know,

0:21:34.119 --> 0:21:37.280
<v Speaker 3>I said, what most of my experience that I can

0:21:37.400 --> 0:21:40.320
<v Speaker 3>remember was being able to move freely through Europe, and

0:21:40.359 --> 0:21:43.280
<v Speaker 3>that's not the case anymore for British as citizens. Yeah,

0:21:43.359 --> 0:21:45.520
<v Speaker 3>like it's getting visas and everything else is getting harder

0:21:45.560 --> 0:21:48.360
<v Speaker 3>and harder to move around the world. And despite the

0:21:48.400 --> 0:21:52.840
<v Speaker 3>Internet somewhat connecting us, like, our physical mobility is certainly

0:21:53.160 --> 0:21:54.000
<v Speaker 3>much more limited.

0:21:54.680 --> 0:21:58.359
<v Speaker 2>Indeed, I think the idea of cost and Paulson is

0:21:59.240 --> 0:22:02.600
<v Speaker 2>getting back to it, I think it's valuable. I think,

0:22:02.680 --> 0:22:05.160
<v Speaker 2>you know, the idea that we have obligations to others

0:22:05.160 --> 0:22:09.159
<v Speaker 2>beyond just our mediate affiliations is important. You know that

0:22:09.240 --> 0:22:11.720
<v Speaker 2>human diversity is going to be valued, not just tolerated.

0:22:11.840 --> 0:22:16.320
<v Speaker 2>That's fantastic. Carl Levy, an anarchist scholar who wrote two

0:22:16.320 --> 0:22:19.040
<v Speaker 2>pieces on cosmopolitanism that a link in the show notes,

0:22:19.440 --> 0:22:23.800
<v Speaker 2>has argued that anarchism's history offers a third way between

0:22:23.920 --> 0:22:28.320
<v Speaker 2>the hierarchical globalism of liberal cosmopolitanism, which relies on state

0:22:28.440 --> 0:22:34.040
<v Speaker 2>driven global governance, and exclusionary nationalism, which weaponizes identity and borders,

0:22:34.200 --> 0:22:37.200
<v Speaker 2>often in service to the far right, and that third

0:22:37.680 --> 0:22:40.720
<v Speaker 2>way that anarchism presents, not third way in the sense

0:22:40.760 --> 0:22:45.600
<v Speaker 2>of fascism. Third way, in the sense of anarchist possibilities,

0:22:46.040 --> 0:22:49.520
<v Speaker 2>is a kind of federated pluralism, the web of self

0:22:49.600 --> 0:22:53.760
<v Speaker 2>organized groups that interact freely without a central authority. This

0:22:53.880 --> 0:22:57.200
<v Speaker 2>version isn't just theoretical. We've seen it in recent history

0:22:57.240 --> 0:23:01.200
<v Speaker 2>through anti globalization protests, the Occupying movement, the Square movements

0:23:01.240 --> 0:23:04.560
<v Speaker 2>in Egypt, Spain and beyond and so flowed. They show

0:23:04.600 --> 0:23:08.840
<v Speaker 2>the potential, not yet fully realized, for diverse place based

0:23:08.840 --> 0:23:14.159
<v Speaker 2>struggles that remain connected through mutuality and transnational solidarity. We

0:23:14.240 --> 0:23:18.400
<v Speaker 2>have to avoid this sort of abstract universalism that can

0:23:18.400 --> 0:23:22.720
<v Speaker 2>be found in cosmopolitan thought. We must incorporate decolonial struggles

0:23:22.760 --> 0:23:26.879
<v Speaker 2>and crown cosmopolitan practice in the voluntary cooperation of people

0:23:27.160 --> 0:23:31.400
<v Speaker 2>acted in solidarity across differences. Ultimately, the question isn't whether

0:23:31.440 --> 0:23:35.600
<v Speaker 2>anarchists should engage a cosmopolitanism, because they always have. The

0:23:35.640 --> 0:23:39.960
<v Speaker 2>real question is how anarchists can cultivate a cosmopolitanism that

0:23:40.040 --> 0:23:45.000
<v Speaker 2>is truly liberatory, when the connect struggles without eraise and difference,

0:23:45.400 --> 0:23:49.960
<v Speaker 2>foster solidarity without enforcing uniformity, and builds a world where

0:23:50.080 --> 0:23:56.399
<v Speaker 2>cooperation and not domination, defines our relationships. That's what they

0:23:56.440 --> 0:23:59.159
<v Speaker 2>have for today, or power to all the people.

0:24:04.280 --> 0:24:06.800
<v Speaker 1>It could Happen Here is a production of cool Zone Media.

0:24:06.960 --> 0:24:10.040
<v Speaker 1>For more podcasts from cool Zone Media, visit our website

0:24:10.119 --> 0:24:13.680
<v Speaker 1>coolzonmedia dot com, or check us out on the iHeartRadio app,

0:24:13.760 --> 0:24:17.320
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to podcasts. You can

0:24:17.359 --> 0:24:19.679
<v Speaker 1>now find sources for it could Happen Here listed directly

0:24:19.720 --> 0:24:22.000
<v Speaker 1>in episode descriptions. Thanks for listening.