1 00:00:00,200 --> 00:00:04,040 Speaker 1: Brunt You by Bank of America Mary Lynch. With virtual reality, 2 00:00:04,320 --> 00:00:09,719 Speaker 1: virtually everything will change. Discover opportunities in a transforming world. 3 00:00:10,119 --> 00:00:14,440 Speaker 1: Be of a, mL dot Com, slash VR, Mary Lynch, 4 00:00:14,520 --> 00:00:29,240 Speaker 1: Pierced Fenner and Smith Incorporated. Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. 5 00:00:29,280 --> 00:00:32,760 Speaker 1: I'm Tom Keene with David Gura. Daily we bring you 6 00:00:32,840 --> 00:00:37,640 Speaker 1: insight from the best of economics, finance, investment, and international relations. 7 00:00:38,120 --> 00:00:43,640 Speaker 1: Find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, Bloomberg dot Com, 8 00:00:43,640 --> 00:00:50,800 Speaker 1: and of course, on the Bloomberg. It is a name 9 00:00:50,840 --> 00:00:54,520 Speaker 1: that all within Bloomberg if they pay attention to the 10 00:00:54,560 --> 00:00:58,560 Speaker 1: Federal Bureau of Investigation. Mr Gavin uh grew up in 11 00:00:58,600 --> 00:01:02,600 Speaker 1: the Venue north the Charles River from Cambridge over to 12 00:01:02,720 --> 00:01:06,120 Speaker 1: Revere and had a story career in the FBI through Denver, Miami, 13 00:01:06,640 --> 00:01:09,200 Speaker 1: and then in New York, including a tour of duty 14 00:01:09,280 --> 00:01:13,480 Speaker 1: during the bombings of two. He's a former Federal Bureau 15 00:01:13,800 --> 00:01:17,560 Speaker 1: of Investigation Assistant director who darkened the door a few 16 00:01:17,600 --> 00:01:20,320 Speaker 1: years ago at Boston College. David, why don't you bring 17 00:01:20,360 --> 00:01:22,560 Speaker 1: in William Gavin? Yeah, William Gavin. Great to have you 18 00:01:22,560 --> 00:01:24,240 Speaker 1: with us here on Bloombergs of Valance, joining us on 19 00:01:24,240 --> 00:01:26,400 Speaker 1: our phone line. Spill I. I was rereading this morning 20 00:01:26,400 --> 00:01:30,000 Speaker 1: that the testimony that James Combey is expected to give today, 21 00:01:30,000 --> 00:01:33,120 Speaker 1: and something I wondered about is the historical relationship between 22 00:01:33,120 --> 00:01:36,400 Speaker 1: the Federal Buer of Investigation and the executive branch. What's 23 00:01:36,400 --> 00:01:38,400 Speaker 1: it been like? How much has that changed over the 24 00:01:38,440 --> 00:01:42,319 Speaker 1: FBI's history. I think over the history it's been basically 25 00:01:42,319 --> 00:01:47,240 Speaker 1: the same. Relationships have been warmer with the White House 26 00:01:47,319 --> 00:01:49,800 Speaker 1: and cooler with the White all depends. I think you 27 00:01:49,920 --> 00:01:54,120 Speaker 1: can recall it when Louis Free was the director, he 28 00:01:54,200 --> 00:01:56,160 Speaker 1: got up his badge to the White House during the 29 00:01:56,240 --> 00:01:59,080 Speaker 1: last year he was with Clinton and and never went 30 00:01:59,120 --> 00:02:00,920 Speaker 1: to the White House again. So there are there are 31 00:02:01,080 --> 00:02:04,400 Speaker 1: there are different kinds of relationships in terms, but basically 32 00:02:04,480 --> 00:02:07,120 Speaker 1: extensive personality to the people involved in both sides of 33 00:02:07,120 --> 00:02:08,880 Speaker 1: the House. Bill Gavin, I don't know if you've you've 34 00:02:08,880 --> 00:02:11,040 Speaker 1: read the prepared testament. It there's a moment after the 35 00:02:11,080 --> 00:02:14,240 Speaker 1: first meeting between James Comey and the present elect at 36 00:02:14,280 --> 00:02:16,600 Speaker 1: Trump Tower in New York. James Coby returns to an 37 00:02:16,600 --> 00:02:18,960 Speaker 1: FBI vehicle and just begins to hammer out notes of 38 00:02:18,960 --> 00:02:22,200 Speaker 1: what happened there in tell us a bit about the 39 00:02:22,240 --> 00:02:25,480 Speaker 1: culture of note note keeping and record keeping within the FBI, 40 00:02:25,560 --> 00:02:27,520 Speaker 1: James Comey pointing out that he had two meetings with 41 00:02:28,000 --> 00:02:30,520 Speaker 1: the previous president, Barack Obama and did not feel compelled 42 00:02:31,000 --> 00:02:33,320 Speaker 1: to do this. How much does an FBI agent an 43 00:02:33,320 --> 00:02:38,120 Speaker 1: FBI director journal what he does? Dude, it's not necessarily 44 00:02:38,160 --> 00:02:40,359 Speaker 1: just the director. It's it's I want to say, it's 45 00:02:40,360 --> 00:02:43,040 Speaker 1: all agents. It's always assistant director. Is a fun thing. 46 00:02:43,760 --> 00:02:47,760 Speaker 1: What happens is you know he didn't document. Jim Comey 47 00:02:47,800 --> 00:02:51,320 Speaker 1: said he didn't document anything with uh Barack Obama, but 48 00:02:51,639 --> 00:02:57,080 Speaker 1: he did when he started talking to um President Trump. 49 00:02:57,520 --> 00:03:00,560 Speaker 1: Bottom line is, it's it's a it's a mechanism that 50 00:03:00,639 --> 00:03:03,120 Speaker 1: goes off inside your head. It's a little bell that says, 51 00:03:03,800 --> 00:03:08,400 Speaker 1: I need to record this conversation. It's an uncomfortable feeling perhaps, 52 00:03:08,480 --> 00:03:11,760 Speaker 1: or it's a feeling that says this is going someplace 53 00:03:11,800 --> 00:03:14,239 Speaker 1: out and I want to make sure I'm on the 54 00:03:14,360 --> 00:03:17,440 Speaker 1: right side of recording this the way I remember it, 55 00:03:17,720 --> 00:03:23,280 Speaker 1: and many many agents and that kind of stuff. Mr Gavin, 56 00:03:23,760 --> 00:03:27,120 Speaker 1: you remember, no doubt. John Bailey, also out of Massachusetts, 57 00:03:27,120 --> 00:03:29,520 Speaker 1: who died in the line of fire for the FBI 58 00:03:30,160 --> 00:03:35,000 Speaker 1: in Las Vegas, over twenty years ago. Um, if you 59 00:03:35,040 --> 00:03:38,320 Speaker 1: were to sit down with the President today and the 60 00:03:38,400 --> 00:03:42,160 Speaker 1: way that he talks about law enforcement in a very 61 00:03:42,200 --> 00:03:44,360 Speaker 1: simplistic way, I think we can all agree on that. 62 00:03:44,800 --> 00:03:47,960 Speaker 1: What would you tell the president about the agents like 63 00:03:48,120 --> 00:03:52,840 Speaker 1: John Bailey? Well, I don't know, as I can tell 64 00:03:52,880 --> 00:03:56,760 Speaker 1: a president anything, Tom, you know, that's that's the nature 65 00:03:56,760 --> 00:03:59,520 Speaker 1: of the beast. The bottom line is, though, I think 66 00:04:00,160 --> 00:04:04,200 Speaker 1: the President does understand the significance and the importance of 67 00:04:04,800 --> 00:04:11,160 Speaker 1: a competent, capable, ethical, independent law enforcement agency within the 68 00:04:11,280 --> 00:04:15,000 Speaker 1: United States government, that that has to happen not just 69 00:04:15,080 --> 00:04:18,200 Speaker 1: within the United States government, within the municipalities as well. 70 00:04:18,600 --> 00:04:21,200 Speaker 1: They have to have all those qualities. And I think 71 00:04:21,200 --> 00:04:24,480 Speaker 1: the President of Philly will understands that, and knowing full 72 00:04:24,560 --> 00:04:27,440 Speaker 1: well that there are every one of the people who 73 00:04:27,520 --> 00:04:29,560 Speaker 1: have sworn the fine men and women of the FBI 74 00:04:29,839 --> 00:04:33,120 Speaker 1: would give their life for their country and for his 75 00:04:33,400 --> 00:04:37,040 Speaker 1: life too. So it's I think I think he understands that. Okay, 76 00:04:37,200 --> 00:04:39,039 Speaker 1: let's let's leave it there. Bill Gavin, thank you so 77 00:04:39,120 --> 00:04:41,720 Speaker 1: much for your time today with Bloomberg Surveillance. Mr Gavin 78 00:04:41,760 --> 00:04:46,120 Speaker 1: as a former UH Assistant director of the Federal Bureau 79 00:04:46,360 --> 00:04:49,400 Speaker 1: of Investigation, David. This has been amazing. I can't say 80 00:04:49,480 --> 00:04:52,440 Speaker 1: enough about the different the many conversations we've had with 81 00:04:52,520 --> 00:04:56,360 Speaker 1: FBI agents. Yeah, the last few weeks, and and again 82 00:04:56,360 --> 00:04:58,400 Speaker 1: we're gonna be looking ahead to some confirmation hearings for 83 00:04:58,440 --> 00:05:00,800 Speaker 1: the man the president tends to dominate. Mr y f 84 00:05:00,839 --> 00:05:03,320 Speaker 1: Behind Christopher Ray, formerly of fIF Kings Balding had been 85 00:05:03,360 --> 00:05:05,320 Speaker 1: at the DJ for a long and by all accounts, 86 00:05:05,360 --> 00:05:07,960 Speaker 1: distinguished career will be following that. And of course that's 87 00:05:07,960 --> 00:05:10,880 Speaker 1: going to take some focus here after the hearing today 88 00:05:10,880 --> 00:05:12,920 Speaker 1: with with James Comey on Capitol Hill. What did you 89 00:05:13,000 --> 00:05:15,080 Speaker 1: learn last time in Washington you were out and about 90 00:05:15,160 --> 00:05:17,840 Speaker 1: I mean, everybody's focused on this. I got it here late. 91 00:05:17,839 --> 00:05:19,640 Speaker 1: But it's been interesting to hear everyone's perspective on what 92 00:05:19,720 --> 00:05:22,360 Speaker 1: stands out the most from the from the written testimony 93 00:05:22,400 --> 00:05:23,919 Speaker 1: that James Comby has been read from today, a lot 94 00:05:23,960 --> 00:05:26,120 Speaker 1: of people talking about remarks the President made about the 95 00:05:26,120 --> 00:05:29,400 Speaker 1: cloud hanging over the White House and how this investigation 96 00:05:29,480 --> 00:05:31,760 Speaker 1: was preventing him, in his estimation, from doing what he 97 00:05:31,760 --> 00:05:33,880 Speaker 1: he wanted to do. Seems like there's some consensus here 98 00:05:33,920 --> 00:05:36,000 Speaker 1: that that's a that's the major theme from from what 99 00:05:36,040 --> 00:05:49,839 Speaker 1: we've rang a lot going on here. We thought we'd 100 00:05:49,839 --> 00:05:52,200 Speaker 1: go finance on your right now, How strange, David Girl, 101 00:05:52,560 --> 00:05:55,880 Speaker 1: No politics? No, why are John Tucker not even approve 102 00:05:56,880 --> 00:06:00,120 Speaker 1: a party of credit squeeze with us? Now? On the 103 00:06:00,160 --> 00:06:02,960 Speaker 1: Fed and what we know about inflation? First of all, 104 00:06:03,000 --> 00:06:06,000 Speaker 1: why is the market so removed from the Fed about 105 00:06:06,000 --> 00:06:10,400 Speaker 1: where inflation is? What do the what did rivatives tell you? Well? 106 00:06:10,440 --> 00:06:13,280 Speaker 1: We have seen inflation break evens come off quite a 107 00:06:13,360 --> 00:06:17,400 Speaker 1: bit since the election, since immediately after the election, and 108 00:06:17,800 --> 00:06:20,880 Speaker 1: part of it is also actually inflation readings have been 109 00:06:20,920 --> 00:06:24,320 Speaker 1: softer than expected. Now the Fed is insisting that this 110 00:06:24,400 --> 00:06:27,480 Speaker 1: is temporary. They're willing to look through it. It remains 111 00:06:27,520 --> 00:06:30,720 Speaker 1: to be seen. I think markets are bought the low 112 00:06:30,720 --> 00:06:34,440 Speaker 1: inflation idea a little more than the Fed has. Uh. 113 00:06:34,680 --> 00:06:36,960 Speaker 1: We'll see who's right over the next couple of readings. 114 00:06:37,600 --> 00:06:39,640 Speaker 1: The five year five year break evens, which is a 115 00:06:39,680 --> 00:06:42,400 Speaker 1: pro phrase folks for looking out five years and then 116 00:06:42,480 --> 00:06:45,440 Speaker 1: five years in there. Is that a good indicator? It's 117 00:06:45,480 --> 00:06:49,040 Speaker 1: it seems a convenient indicator. Does it actually tell us 118 00:06:49,040 --> 00:06:52,719 Speaker 1: what the market believes? Uh? In a way it does? Uh, 119 00:06:52,760 --> 00:06:55,400 Speaker 1: And certainly that's something the Fed looks at as well. 120 00:06:56,200 --> 00:07:00,400 Speaker 1: The question is are they right? Uh? Well, often times 121 00:07:00,680 --> 00:07:05,200 Speaker 1: they've moved a fair amount with really little new information. 122 00:07:05,279 --> 00:07:08,640 Speaker 1: So sometimes it could be technical, but certainly it's something 123 00:07:08,680 --> 00:07:11,840 Speaker 1: the markets look at, and that's the best market gauge 124 00:07:11,920 --> 00:07:13,760 Speaker 1: that you do have, you know, Honor David of the 125 00:07:13,840 --> 00:07:16,720 Speaker 1: complete focus on Washingtonday, I am going to do a 126 00:07:16,720 --> 00:07:21,120 Speaker 1: five year, five year break even shart with the Fibonacci overlow, 127 00:07:22,000 --> 00:07:25,160 Speaker 1: just to push against the Comy testimony. I'll be showing 128 00:07:25,200 --> 00:07:27,880 Speaker 1: that everyone here in our we're here with priving core 129 00:07:27,920 --> 00:07:29,920 Speaker 1: party on Bloomberg surveillance. Help us look ahead to the 130 00:07:29,920 --> 00:07:32,800 Speaker 1: FED meeting next week, we're anticipating we might get some 131 00:07:32,840 --> 00:07:35,000 Speaker 1: more color on what the balance sheet unwind is gonna be. Like, 132 00:07:35,040 --> 00:07:36,800 Speaker 1: do you think we're gonna get anything more on the 133 00:07:36,800 --> 00:07:40,480 Speaker 1: inflation outlook with the balance of risks? I think the 134 00:07:40,480 --> 00:07:43,680 Speaker 1: balance of risk the Fed has moved from you know 135 00:07:43,920 --> 00:07:46,960 Speaker 1: for a while now to a more balanced approach, and 136 00:07:47,040 --> 00:07:50,720 Speaker 1: certainly I think the bigger concern that might come through 137 00:07:51,040 --> 00:07:54,800 Speaker 1: is what's happening to inflation? Right? I think in terms 138 00:07:54,840 --> 00:07:58,239 Speaker 1: of growth, they're comfortable with where we are, so really 139 00:07:58,240 --> 00:08:00,600 Speaker 1: the question is how they address inflation. To us, that's 140 00:08:00,600 --> 00:08:04,440 Speaker 1: the more interesting point. Now with regards to balance sheet, Uh, 141 00:08:04,760 --> 00:08:07,480 Speaker 1: you might get a bit of a bit more color. 142 00:08:08,280 --> 00:08:10,520 Speaker 1: But the staff proposal that we saw in the last 143 00:08:10,600 --> 00:08:14,840 Speaker 1: minute was very, very gradual. It's literally watching paint dry. 144 00:08:15,480 --> 00:08:19,840 Speaker 1: And so if you get, you know, some indication that is, 145 00:08:19,880 --> 00:08:23,760 Speaker 1: in fact where the actual voting members are, this may 146 00:08:23,840 --> 00:08:29,240 Speaker 1: prove to be much less rackfull. Event what do you 147 00:08:29,400 --> 00:08:32,760 Speaker 1: use is you get closer to June four, is there 148 00:08:32,880 --> 00:08:36,840 Speaker 1: some mechani that's the right word, David, thank you, mechanism 149 00:08:36,920 --> 00:08:39,800 Speaker 1: that you use to get a clearer picture within all 150 00:08:39,840 --> 00:08:44,720 Speaker 1: the media bladder that we create every day. So to 151 00:08:44,760 --> 00:08:48,280 Speaker 1: be clear, there's no uncertainty at least from markets perspective 152 00:08:48,280 --> 00:08:50,199 Speaker 1: about whether there's going to be a June hike. Right, 153 00:08:50,280 --> 00:08:54,600 Speaker 1: that's price it's like, yeah, almost certain, right. So the 154 00:08:54,640 --> 00:08:58,079 Speaker 1: real question is what happens thereafter, what happens in September? 155 00:08:58,200 --> 00:09:02,320 Speaker 1: Right now, September markets aren't really pricing much of a hike. Uh, 156 00:09:02,360 --> 00:09:07,160 Speaker 1: And that's where the FEDS thoughts on inflation will matter. Now, 157 00:09:07,160 --> 00:09:10,560 Speaker 1: I will say Septembers for different reasons shaping up to 158 00:09:10,559 --> 00:09:14,320 Speaker 1: be quite interesting. You have potentially the dead limit, death 159 00:09:14,360 --> 00:09:19,120 Speaker 1: ceiling mean rased. You know, the budget needs to be passed. 160 00:09:19,120 --> 00:09:21,320 Speaker 1: So there are a bunch of things, and then potentially 161 00:09:21,320 --> 00:09:24,800 Speaker 1: German elections and Italian elections, so that might give the 162 00:09:24,840 --> 00:09:29,080 Speaker 1: Fed some pause. Markets are aware that there's this timing issue, 163 00:09:29,200 --> 00:09:31,880 Speaker 1: so there's not more price in September at this point. Okay, 164 00:09:31,920 --> 00:09:33,640 Speaker 1: we gotta come back and do some more charts. I'm 165 00:09:33,640 --> 00:09:35,520 Speaker 1: putting out this chart down for David gur to get 166 00:09:35,559 --> 00:09:40,800 Speaker 1: them away. Phibology very good. David Crivne Herr party with 167 00:09:40,880 --> 00:09:44,280 Speaker 1: us in charge of Fibonacci overlays the credit sweet will continue. 168 00:09:44,559 --> 00:09:49,000 Speaker 1: Our discussion wonderful researchers, really really arcane finance and the 169 00:09:49,080 --> 00:09:52,880 Speaker 1: dynamics of the derivative market will continue with the discussion 170 00:09:53,280 --> 00:09:54,560 Speaker 1: on Then I want to bring in a little bit 171 00:09:54,600 --> 00:09:57,840 Speaker 1: of fat tale thought here as well. It's a good 172 00:09:57,840 --> 00:10:01,160 Speaker 1: time to have priving cor party with us with credit suites, 173 00:10:01,200 --> 00:10:04,480 Speaker 1: in derivatives, in fixed income and looking at what our 174 00:10:04,559 --> 00:10:07,920 Speaker 1: central banks too. I'm gonna call it a pretty careful 175 00:10:08,040 --> 00:10:14,040 Speaker 1: synodal function. Euro spike higher, spike stronger, and then massive 176 00:10:14,080 --> 00:10:18,679 Speaker 1: abrupt reversal to a weaker euro and now some stability. 177 00:10:19,000 --> 00:10:22,079 Speaker 1: The headlines were actually pretty interesting. This Drugg he got 178 00:10:22,120 --> 00:10:25,200 Speaker 1: out in front of his press conference with a set 179 00:10:25,200 --> 00:10:29,000 Speaker 1: of headlines, didn't he probably, yes, he did. Uh. We 180 00:10:29,000 --> 00:10:32,400 Speaker 1: were expecting the a bit more of a removal of 181 00:10:32,440 --> 00:10:35,240 Speaker 1: some of the more dubbish elements of their forward guidance. 182 00:10:35,520 --> 00:10:39,439 Speaker 1: They did some, for example, they did drop the lower 183 00:10:39,760 --> 00:10:42,559 Speaker 1: reference in terms of the rate, but we also thought 184 00:10:42,600 --> 00:10:46,480 Speaker 1: they would modify the well passed the end of Fassett 185 00:10:46,559 --> 00:10:48,800 Speaker 1: much is us to just passed? Right? It's I know 186 00:10:48,840 --> 00:10:54,079 Speaker 1: I'm shading words here. Well, I'm shocked. Excuse Colin. We 187 00:10:54,160 --> 00:10:58,080 Speaker 1: have a derivatives guy in the house and his shading words. Okay, 188 00:10:59,040 --> 00:11:03,440 Speaker 1: to protect the children, I continue. Yeah, So I think 189 00:11:03,800 --> 00:11:07,679 Speaker 1: there's a bit of you know, reassessment of how quickly 190 00:11:07,720 --> 00:11:10,600 Speaker 1: they may you know, pull back some of the stimulus. 191 00:11:10,640 --> 00:11:12,520 Speaker 1: But largely it was in line with what we expect. 192 00:11:12,640 --> 00:11:14,520 Speaker 1: And we're right there right now. We're you know, within 193 00:11:14,600 --> 00:11:17,600 Speaker 1: pips of where we were in line. If if I 194 00:11:17,600 --> 00:11:20,800 Speaker 1: look at the e C B and without all the 195 00:11:20,840 --> 00:11:23,440 Speaker 1: focus in Europe obviously, how do I bring that over 196 00:11:23,480 --> 00:11:27,319 Speaker 1: to June four in chair yelling because she's got an 197 00:11:27,320 --> 00:11:30,920 Speaker 1: inflation vector which they've bought a full bode and it's 198 00:11:31,000 --> 00:11:33,160 Speaker 1: rolled over a little bit. They got this rolling over 199 00:11:33,200 --> 00:11:36,160 Speaker 1: that rolling over GDP. Who knows how does all this 200 00:11:36,360 --> 00:11:40,880 Speaker 1: roll over to June fourteen? So, Uh, the inflation problem 201 00:11:40,920 --> 00:11:43,000 Speaker 1: that you mentioned is something that e c B has 202 00:11:43,040 --> 00:11:48,040 Speaker 1: as well. So I think the the uh stance lots 203 00:11:48,080 --> 00:11:50,480 Speaker 1: of these central bankers are taking at this point is 204 00:11:50,600 --> 00:11:53,160 Speaker 1: basically that we look through it for now, and I 205 00:11:53,200 --> 00:11:55,600 Speaker 1: think the fedest telegraphed that they will do that in 206 00:11:55,679 --> 00:12:00,880 Speaker 1: June fourteen. Beyond that remains to be seen. We just don't. Yeah, 207 00:12:01,480 --> 00:12:03,400 Speaker 1: how big a deal is this? Again? I look at 208 00:12:03,400 --> 00:12:05,400 Speaker 1: the headline they're emitting that guidance interest rates might be 209 00:12:05,520 --> 00:12:07,720 Speaker 1: be cut again? Uh? Is it? Is it taking a 210 00:12:07,720 --> 00:12:10,120 Speaker 1: big step? A small step? Here? Help me understand just 211 00:12:10,240 --> 00:12:12,840 Speaker 1: the gravity of the move that the Governing Council has made. 212 00:12:13,280 --> 00:12:16,280 Speaker 1: I would say it's a small step. It's something that 213 00:12:16,440 --> 00:12:19,520 Speaker 1: markets were largely expecting. And that's part of the reason. 214 00:12:19,679 --> 00:12:23,080 Speaker 1: Is Uh. Several ECB speakers have been clear that they 215 00:12:23,120 --> 00:12:26,080 Speaker 1: see in terms of the economy, UH, that there's no 216 00:12:26,120 --> 00:12:29,680 Speaker 1: longer any downside risk. Right, So if that's your view 217 00:12:29,679 --> 00:12:32,560 Speaker 1: of the economy, I think it's appropriate to be removing 218 00:12:32,600 --> 00:12:35,760 Speaker 1: that language. And now your geek moment for the morning, folks. 219 00:12:35,880 --> 00:12:40,040 Speaker 1: Here's the headline ECB drops reference to lower rates in 220 00:12:40,200 --> 00:12:43,720 Speaker 1: forward guidance. When you and I studied derivatives, forward guides 221 00:12:43,800 --> 00:12:47,760 Speaker 1: didn't exist. There were difference equations ex. Post x anti 222 00:12:48,120 --> 00:12:50,800 Speaker 1: t T plus one che plus two when you struggle 223 00:12:50,920 --> 00:12:54,920 Speaker 1: through first order and second order difference equations. Is forward 224 00:12:54,960 --> 00:12:57,840 Speaker 1: guidance nothing more than a pr event? Is it nothing 225 00:12:57,840 --> 00:13:02,560 Speaker 1: more than almost a marketing and pain by well meaning economists? 226 00:13:03,160 --> 00:13:05,959 Speaker 1: I would say it's more than a marketing campaign, particularly 227 00:13:06,000 --> 00:13:08,920 Speaker 1: if you view the central bank is credible right, and 228 00:13:09,040 --> 00:13:11,840 Speaker 1: you can make the argument that both the fat uh 229 00:13:11,840 --> 00:13:14,920 Speaker 1: you know Postwoker and certainly the easy be have earned 230 00:13:15,200 --> 00:13:17,960 Speaker 1: some amount of credibility. Yes, so if they pre commit 231 00:13:18,040 --> 00:13:21,080 Speaker 1: to say keeping great statement, but they don't pre commit, 232 00:13:21,120 --> 00:13:23,640 Speaker 1: they change. If the facts change I change, they do. 233 00:13:23,880 --> 00:13:27,680 Speaker 1: Kins if things change, they do. But again this is 234 00:13:27,679 --> 00:13:30,400 Speaker 1: where credibility is important. I would say, if there are 235 00:13:30,440 --> 00:13:33,640 Speaker 1: small changes in the economic outlook, they probably stick to 236 00:13:33,760 --> 00:13:35,920 Speaker 1: the forward guidance to be so as to be incredible. 237 00:13:36,240 --> 00:13:38,160 Speaker 1: But if there are a lot of changes, they will 238 00:13:39,040 --> 00:13:41,400 Speaker 1: make the change that you mentioned, and I think markets 239 00:13:41,400 --> 00:13:43,800 Speaker 1: will sort of overlook back. Okay, let's go to Bullard 240 00:13:43,920 --> 00:13:47,520 Speaker 1: small Paper and in in Jim bowder St Louis is 241 00:13:47,600 --> 00:13:50,439 Speaker 1: sat on surveillance. It said, it is a small paper 242 00:13:50,800 --> 00:13:55,120 Speaker 1: worth study. He wants a regime change where we wait, 243 00:13:55,320 --> 00:13:57,360 Speaker 1: we don't worry about tip US one, tip US two, 244 00:13:57,440 --> 00:14:00,960 Speaker 1: forward guidance dots and the rest until we see a 245 00:14:01,040 --> 00:14:03,840 Speaker 1: regime change. What's really going on in the last four 246 00:14:03,880 --> 00:14:08,120 Speaker 1: weeks is disappointment that the regime change isn't regiming, is it. 247 00:14:08,320 --> 00:14:11,160 Speaker 1: I mean, it's not happening. I think there's some of that. 248 00:14:11,440 --> 00:14:14,959 Speaker 1: I think there's a concern that, you know, maybe we 249 00:14:15,080 --> 00:14:17,600 Speaker 1: aren't getting out of this low inflation world after all. 250 00:14:18,160 --> 00:14:22,920 Speaker 1: So uh again, uh go back to my point that 251 00:14:23,120 --> 00:14:27,200 Speaker 1: inflation prints over the next three months are key to watch. Growth. 252 00:14:27,560 --> 00:14:30,480 Speaker 1: Remember has been pretty good. I mean I should say 253 00:14:30,520 --> 00:14:34,320 Speaker 1: good in the context of this recovery. Ah. So it's 254 00:14:34,320 --> 00:14:37,400 Speaker 1: really what we're talking about is, you know, both v 255 00:14:37,640 --> 00:14:41,080 Speaker 1: as market participants and the FED and the ECB watching inflation. 256 00:14:41,800 --> 00:14:44,200 Speaker 1: Excuse me, David, I wanted to bring us up. The 257 00:14:44,240 --> 00:14:47,560 Speaker 1: Atlanta g d P number is still very nice. It's 258 00:14:47,600 --> 00:14:52,800 Speaker 1: a ginormous like President Trump kind of three point, but 259 00:14:52,880 --> 00:14:55,160 Speaker 1: it's at the low end of the range. I mean, 260 00:14:55,240 --> 00:14:57,920 Speaker 1: it's I don't know, Mr com Comy is gonna comment 261 00:14:57,960 --> 00:15:01,360 Speaker 1: on the Atlanta now GDP four. Yes, but even g 262 00:15:01,480 --> 00:15:03,440 Speaker 1: d P is starting to roll over a little bit. 263 00:15:03,480 --> 00:15:05,800 Speaker 1: I don't want to oversell that. We'll know a lot 264 00:15:05,800 --> 00:15:08,320 Speaker 1: more about that in the next four weeks or so. 265 00:15:08,880 --> 00:15:11,080 Speaker 1: See how I got Mr Comey in there. Even pretty good. 266 00:15:11,200 --> 00:15:16,120 Speaker 1: We're talking Gaussian models for being Let me ask you 267 00:15:16,120 --> 00:15:19,160 Speaker 1: about personnel and the FED reporting this week that a 268 00:15:19,240 --> 00:15:21,440 Speaker 1: good friend of surveillance, Marvin good Friend, might be considered 269 00:15:21,440 --> 00:15:24,920 Speaker 1: for a post as a FED governor. Perhaps, what do 270 00:15:24,920 --> 00:15:26,080 Speaker 1: you make of that? What does that tell you about 271 00:15:26,160 --> 00:15:28,600 Speaker 1: the direction of the FED, the way that it's where 272 00:15:28,600 --> 00:15:32,200 Speaker 1: it might be headed? Uh, now, that's very interesting in 273 00:15:32,280 --> 00:15:35,080 Speaker 1: terms of, you know, developments for you know, the composition 274 00:15:35,120 --> 00:15:38,040 Speaker 1: of the FED. We have, in some sense now all 275 00:15:38,080 --> 00:15:41,920 Speaker 1: three candidates for the weekend slot right now, if you 276 00:15:42,000 --> 00:15:45,960 Speaker 1: make the assumption that Yellen might stay, which is clearly 277 00:15:45,960 --> 00:15:48,240 Speaker 1: a questionable assumption, but let's say that's the case. You're 278 00:15:48,240 --> 00:15:52,120 Speaker 1: making that assumption. Uh not right now, No, we're not. 279 00:15:52,640 --> 00:15:56,240 Speaker 1: But let's say Trump had to pick one of these three, uh, 280 00:15:57,360 --> 00:16:00,760 Speaker 1: gentlemen as the FED chair. Now it's a good friend. 281 00:16:00,920 --> 00:16:04,680 Speaker 1: We've heard him on record say he thinks the interest 282 00:16:04,760 --> 00:16:07,520 Speaker 1: rate should be a lot higher. By a lot higher, 283 00:16:07,560 --> 00:16:10,400 Speaker 1: I mean closer to two percent, which means I think 284 00:16:10,400 --> 00:16:13,800 Speaker 1: it will be a hawkish addition to the uh fed 285 00:16:14,040 --> 00:16:16,960 Speaker 1: to David's brilliant question, way more brilliant than anything I'd 286 00:16:17,000 --> 00:16:20,440 Speaker 1: come up with. Is the idea of rules versus discretion. 287 00:16:20,640 --> 00:16:23,880 Speaker 1: Mr good Friend clearly tilts over to a more rules 288 00:16:23,920 --> 00:16:29,960 Speaker 1: based appro Is that we're what we're really talking about here? Um, well, yes, 289 00:16:30,360 --> 00:16:33,120 Speaker 1: but we should also see what the rules are telling you. Right, 290 00:16:33,120 --> 00:16:35,280 Speaker 1: So the rules right now telling you the rate should 291 00:16:35,280 --> 00:16:38,520 Speaker 1: be higher, and so the net effect if you try 292 00:16:38,560 --> 00:16:41,480 Speaker 1: to gauge what that might mean in terms of the 293 00:16:41,520 --> 00:16:45,000 Speaker 1: palsy rate, it would argue for a higher rate. Now, 294 00:16:45,600 --> 00:16:47,520 Speaker 1: it's not clear that he'll be able to carry the 295 00:16:47,560 --> 00:16:51,080 Speaker 1: rest of the committee with him, but certainly that's where 296 00:16:51,120 --> 00:16:54,400 Speaker 1: he appears to me. But this is so important. The 297 00:16:54,440 --> 00:16:56,560 Speaker 1: two yearyeld. I did the chart yesterday. I'll send it 298 00:16:56,560 --> 00:16:59,080 Speaker 1: out again folks on Twitter. The two year yield less 299 00:16:59,080 --> 00:17:03,640 Speaker 1: the inflation, right, it's still negative? Right? What happens if 300 00:17:03,640 --> 00:17:05,680 Speaker 1: they raise rates in June and then one more time? 301 00:17:05,760 --> 00:17:09,320 Speaker 1: Does the world end as we know it? Uh? No, 302 00:17:09,520 --> 00:17:12,840 Speaker 1: that that's that's a great question. I think Uh, we've 303 00:17:12,840 --> 00:17:15,040 Speaker 1: had negative real rates at the front end for a 304 00:17:15,040 --> 00:17:17,199 Speaker 1: while back to zero, right, So we've had it for 305 00:17:17,240 --> 00:17:22,639 Speaker 1: a while. I don't necessarily think the world ends. I 306 00:17:22,680 --> 00:17:27,120 Speaker 1: think there's some room because remember the FED is still 307 00:17:27,359 --> 00:17:29,919 Speaker 1: hiking at a very gradual pace. Now, if they were 308 00:17:29,960 --> 00:17:33,199 Speaker 1: to accelerate, that might be a problem. Uh, we don't 309 00:17:33,280 --> 00:17:35,600 Speaker 1: see that happening anytime soon. We think they will still 310 00:17:35,640 --> 00:17:38,480 Speaker 1: be very measured. As I mentioned uh a little earlier 311 00:17:38,480 --> 00:17:42,119 Speaker 1: in the show. Uh, September for example, is not automatic, 312 00:17:42,280 --> 00:17:44,280 Speaker 1: right in terms of their right. Hy, this has been great. 313 00:17:44,280 --> 00:17:47,840 Speaker 1: Don't be a stranger proving core party with us with sweets. 314 00:17:47,960 --> 00:17:58,840 Speaker 1: Next time we'll do uh puss on distributions and brought 315 00:17:58,880 --> 00:18:02,400 Speaker 1: you by Bank of a America Mary Lynch. With virtual reality, 316 00:18:02,680 --> 00:18:08,080 Speaker 1: virtually everything will change. Discover opportunities in a transforming world. 317 00:18:08,560 --> 00:18:12,800 Speaker 1: VI of a mL dot Com slash VR, Mary Lynch, 318 00:18:12,880 --> 00:18:23,400 Speaker 1: Pierced Fenner and Smith Incorporated. The euro hunched pretty much 319 00:18:23,640 --> 00:18:26,200 Speaker 1: off of the ECB news No surprise it really went. 320 00:18:27,840 --> 00:18:31,720 Speaker 1: Is very technical term. But to give us really our 321 00:18:31,760 --> 00:18:36,040 Speaker 1: first briefing on what we're observing in Washington. Uh this morning, 322 00:18:36,040 --> 00:18:38,080 Speaker 1: what a joy to speak to William Gavin, the former 323 00:18:38,119 --> 00:18:41,679 Speaker 1: assistant director of the FBI, so associated with Boston, and 324 00:18:42,200 --> 00:18:46,320 Speaker 1: we say good morning Bloomberg, Boston and Cambridge and Revere 325 00:18:46,800 --> 00:18:49,520 Speaker 1: where Mr Gavin grew up and out of Boston College. 326 00:18:49,600 --> 00:18:51,320 Speaker 1: Now we got to go to the belt White David 327 00:18:51,560 --> 00:18:53,880 Speaker 1: with our esteem guests, give us a briefing. Yeah, Terry 328 00:18:53,920 --> 00:18:56,040 Speaker 1: hands with us here senior political strategises at ever Core 329 00:18:56,119 --> 00:18:57,479 Speaker 1: I s I has been kind enough to join us 330 00:18:57,480 --> 00:18:59,560 Speaker 1: a couple of times this week here with us now 331 00:18:59,600 --> 00:19:01,560 Speaker 1: in our Blue Breaking nine studios on what is a 332 00:19:01,600 --> 00:19:04,240 Speaker 1: big day in Washington, d C. What are we gonna 333 00:19:04,240 --> 00:19:06,120 Speaker 1: get out of this? There's the pomp and the circumstance, 334 00:19:06,119 --> 00:19:08,639 Speaker 1: there's the testimony, which we've seen in advance. There's going 335 00:19:08,680 --> 00:19:11,080 Speaker 1: to be some heated question. Where do things go from here? 336 00:19:11,080 --> 00:19:13,760 Speaker 1: How does this set the investigation on track? On a 337 00:19:13,800 --> 00:19:17,000 Speaker 1: different track? What do you think we're gonna learn? Good 338 00:19:17,000 --> 00:19:19,600 Speaker 1: morning David, Good morning Tom, and thanks again for having me. 339 00:19:19,920 --> 00:19:23,040 Speaker 1: H Well, I think on on track. You know it's 340 00:19:23,040 --> 00:19:26,280 Speaker 1: gonna what you're gonna see as an investigation that that 341 00:19:26,320 --> 00:19:28,720 Speaker 1: winds out over a period of months or even years. 342 00:19:29,480 --> 00:19:31,879 Speaker 1: You've you've had a special counsel appointed just within the 343 00:19:31,920 --> 00:19:36,080 Speaker 1: past few weeks, uh, former Director Mueller, that special counsel 344 00:19:36,160 --> 00:19:40,040 Speaker 1: is just setting up his own his own shop, taking 345 00:19:40,520 --> 00:19:45,000 Speaker 1: briefings from FBI people and others on the status of 346 00:19:45,040 --> 00:19:48,560 Speaker 1: the investigation and uh. And so they're probably at about 347 00:19:48,600 --> 00:19:51,639 Speaker 1: the point now where they get started. Uh. And they'll 348 00:19:51,640 --> 00:19:55,360 Speaker 1: wind through this and you know, as as Comey's statement 349 00:19:55,400 --> 00:19:59,200 Speaker 1: referenced yesterday, UH, you know, they'll do the best investigation 350 00:19:59,280 --> 00:20:02,760 Speaker 1: they can uh, as quickly as they can. But that 351 00:20:02,960 --> 00:20:04,600 Speaker 1: is not going to that that's not going to go 352 00:20:04,680 --> 00:20:06,720 Speaker 1: fast in market time. That's going to be a very 353 00:20:06,760 --> 00:20:11,600 Speaker 1: slow wind out event without bombshells every day, unlike what 354 00:20:11,720 --> 00:20:14,679 Speaker 1: we've seen over the past month or so. Uh. You 355 00:20:14,720 --> 00:20:17,800 Speaker 1: know what we're gonna learn today based on Comey's testimony 356 00:20:18,000 --> 00:20:20,720 Speaker 1: is is really not a lot new that you know, 357 00:20:20,760 --> 00:20:23,760 Speaker 1: there's a lot of reference in the political press to 358 00:20:24,119 --> 00:20:28,400 Speaker 1: you know, cinematic detail and the like. But fundamentally, two 359 00:20:28,440 --> 00:20:31,240 Speaker 1: things uh come out come out of this written testimony. 360 00:20:31,280 --> 00:20:37,240 Speaker 1: The first is that Comy confirms that the president is 361 00:20:37,240 --> 00:20:40,280 Speaker 1: not personally under investigation. UH. And the second thing that 362 00:20:40,359 --> 00:20:43,560 Speaker 1: comes out is really that there's no new detail at all. UH. 363 00:20:43,720 --> 00:20:47,040 Speaker 1: So things remain somewhat ambiguous, and I don't say that 364 00:20:47,119 --> 00:20:49,399 Speaker 1: as any sort of Trump supporter or de writer. I 365 00:20:49,400 --> 00:20:53,920 Speaker 1: mean they just the motivations here remain ambiguous, and ultimately 366 00:20:54,040 --> 00:20:56,240 Speaker 1: that's up to a former director Muller to try to 367 00:20:56,280 --> 00:20:57,919 Speaker 1: figure out. So this is gonna take a while. And 368 00:20:57,920 --> 00:21:00,280 Speaker 1: Sarah were talking with Jeenan Martin Adams yesterday, She's US 369 00:21:00,320 --> 00:21:03,480 Speaker 1: Equity Strategistic Bloomberg Intelligence talking with John Tucker, our friend 370 00:21:03,480 --> 00:21:05,760 Speaker 1: and colleague as well, expressing a little bit of skepticism 371 00:21:05,800 --> 00:21:08,639 Speaker 1: here about the market importance of what we're seeing here today. 372 00:21:08,640 --> 00:21:09,760 Speaker 1: What do you say to them, what do you say 373 00:21:09,800 --> 00:21:12,679 Speaker 1: to clients about how what will go on in the 374 00:21:12,680 --> 00:21:15,080 Speaker 1: heart Senate office building today, how that might matter to 375 00:21:15,119 --> 00:21:18,240 Speaker 1: markets if at all? Well, it matters if there's some 376 00:21:18,280 --> 00:21:21,919 Speaker 1: sort of bombshell beyond what we already know, uh, to 377 00:21:22,040 --> 00:21:25,440 Speaker 1: the extent that so that that uh, you know, there's 378 00:21:25,720 --> 00:21:29,159 Speaker 1: a shade or a clouds the president apparently puts it 379 00:21:29,600 --> 00:21:33,360 Speaker 1: on the presidency. It matters if there's something that comes 380 00:21:33,359 --> 00:21:36,640 Speaker 1: out of the Comy testimony that is a significant negative 381 00:21:36,680 --> 00:21:39,360 Speaker 1: beyond what we already know that he's going to say. 382 00:21:39,520 --> 00:21:42,480 Speaker 1: If not, uh, then it's not gonna be much of 383 00:21:42,520 --> 00:21:45,600 Speaker 1: a market event. And that that's probably the the that 384 00:21:45,600 --> 00:21:49,680 Speaker 1: that's probably the lead dog here. To be clear here, 385 00:21:49,800 --> 00:21:52,920 Speaker 1: Terry and I haven't had this answered yet. Does Mr 386 00:21:53,000 --> 00:21:56,400 Speaker 1: Comey is he under an obligation to say everything he knows? 387 00:21:57,119 --> 00:21:59,320 Speaker 1: Or has he basically gone to Mr Mueller and said, 388 00:21:59,359 --> 00:22:01,000 Speaker 1: what would you like me to say? So I don't 389 00:22:01,040 --> 00:22:05,000 Speaker 1: impede whatever you're doing. Is a public servant? Which way 390 00:22:05,040 --> 00:22:08,080 Speaker 1: does it cut? It's a very smart question, Tom, and 391 00:22:08,119 --> 00:22:10,240 Speaker 1: not in the usual Washington sense of if it's a 392 00:22:10,280 --> 00:22:13,120 Speaker 1: smart question, therefore I'm about to disagree with you. Uh, 393 00:22:13,280 --> 00:22:15,320 Speaker 1: It's a very smart question. And the answer the answer 394 00:22:15,359 --> 00:22:19,920 Speaker 1: is both. Uh. He isn't under an obligation to say everything. 395 00:22:20,480 --> 00:22:24,159 Speaker 1: But what I want to point out to both David 396 00:22:24,200 --> 00:22:28,280 Speaker 1: and you and the listeners as well, is that he's 397 00:22:28,320 --> 00:22:31,159 Speaker 1: not under obligation to say everything he knows in the 398 00:22:31,200 --> 00:22:35,760 Speaker 1: open sets. Just just like yesterday. Uh. There there were 399 00:22:36,160 --> 00:22:40,480 Speaker 1: general statements made by Admiral Rodgers, d N I. Coats 400 00:22:40,520 --> 00:22:45,680 Speaker 1: and others, and general statements about how they felt their 401 00:22:45,720 --> 00:22:48,800 Speaker 1: interactions with the President went, but they did not feel 402 00:22:48,800 --> 00:22:53,359 Speaker 1: comfortable testifying about the specifics in open session. I fully 403 00:22:53,400 --> 00:22:56,800 Speaker 1: expect that they offered those more specific opinions in the 404 00:22:56,800 --> 00:22:59,960 Speaker 1: close session, and there will be a close session here 405 00:23:00,080 --> 00:23:03,080 Speaker 1: for Comy this afternoon as well. So what you're gonna 406 00:23:03,119 --> 00:23:05,840 Speaker 1: get is you're gonna get generalities from Comy. You are 407 00:23:05,840 --> 00:23:09,880 Speaker 1: going to get some more specifics, uh, from the Intel Committee, who, 408 00:23:10,040 --> 00:23:12,440 Speaker 1: you know, let's remember our conduct is conducting their own 409 00:23:12,440 --> 00:23:15,520 Speaker 1: investigation here as well. You know, I'm wondering the degree 410 00:23:15,560 --> 00:23:17,760 Speaker 1: to which this is distracting from what Congress would like 411 00:23:17,800 --> 00:23:19,200 Speaker 1: to be doing otherways. This is, this is going to 412 00:23:19,240 --> 00:23:21,720 Speaker 1: create a lot of focus, take a lot of focus 413 00:23:21,880 --> 00:23:24,800 Speaker 1: away from taxi, former healthcare reform where uh the death 414 00:23:24,840 --> 00:23:27,040 Speaker 1: ceiling or funding all of that. How long is that 415 00:23:27,040 --> 00:23:29,560 Speaker 1: going to continue? This a one day event? You mentioned 416 00:23:29,560 --> 00:23:31,600 Speaker 1: that the long time horizon here we're looking at for 417 00:23:31,640 --> 00:23:35,119 Speaker 1: an investigation of of this nature. How worried are you 418 00:23:35,160 --> 00:23:39,160 Speaker 1: about legislative agenda items being scuttled because of this? Well, 419 00:23:39,200 --> 00:23:43,000 Speaker 1: I'm I'm less worried than most people, and I'm not 420 00:23:43,119 --> 00:23:46,280 Speaker 1: sanguine about any of this, but I'm less worried about 421 00:23:46,320 --> 00:23:49,800 Speaker 1: this than most people. But frankly because as I say, uh, 422 00:23:49,880 --> 00:23:53,080 Speaker 1: this investigation is in these investigations, I should say, both 423 00:23:53,119 --> 00:23:56,800 Speaker 1: from Mueller's side and from the Congressional side, are gonna 424 00:23:56,840 --> 00:23:59,600 Speaker 1: go on for months or or even longer. There won't 425 00:23:59,640 --> 00:24:03,000 Speaker 1: be them shells every day. There won't be public statements 426 00:24:03,040 --> 00:24:05,120 Speaker 1: every day or every week for that matter, I would 427 00:24:05,200 --> 00:24:08,000 Speaker 1: guess and uh, and so what you're gonna get as 428 00:24:08,000 --> 00:24:10,600 Speaker 1: a return to normality more than anything else. To me, 429 00:24:10,800 --> 00:24:15,159 Speaker 1: the bigger concern from markets is not so much juice 430 00:24:15,200 --> 00:24:17,960 Speaker 1: going out of the Trump presidency or momentum from the 431 00:24:17,960 --> 00:24:22,520 Speaker 1: White House side. It's what needs, What is happening right now, 432 00:24:22,560 --> 00:24:27,160 Speaker 1: I think is that Congress very much needs the Republican 433 00:24:27,200 --> 00:24:30,520 Speaker 1: majorities in Congress, particularly on the Affordable Care Act on 434 00:24:30,720 --> 00:24:33,760 Speaker 1: tax reform, which are closely linked, as you both know, 435 00:24:35,000 --> 00:24:38,240 Speaker 1: very much need to get their acts together and to 436 00:24:38,880 --> 00:24:41,600 Speaker 1: to actually figure out what the path forward is on that. 437 00:24:41,720 --> 00:24:45,920 Speaker 1: If they if they continue to dissipate and uh beny 438 00:24:45,960 --> 00:24:50,000 Speaker 1: momentum and bicker among themselves about what the big items 439 00:24:50,040 --> 00:24:53,440 Speaker 1: are and how and when they're going to achieve them, uh, 440 00:24:53,640 --> 00:24:55,560 Speaker 1: that becomes a problem. And that has little to do 441 00:24:55,600 --> 00:24:58,440 Speaker 1: with the Trump investigation. Frankly, that needs that that that 442 00:24:58,440 --> 00:25:01,240 Speaker 1: that needs to be a moment whe our Republicans get 443 00:25:01,280 --> 00:25:03,119 Speaker 1: to agree and move forward. I think most of our 444 00:25:03,160 --> 00:25:06,280 Speaker 1: audience understands David gurin Washington this morning. I'm in New York, 445 00:25:06,359 --> 00:25:09,560 Speaker 1: David Garin knowing a lot more about Washington and I do. 446 00:25:09,720 --> 00:25:13,639 Speaker 1: He's drunk the Kool Years and Terry Haynes with us 447 00:25:13,640 --> 00:25:16,320 Speaker 1: as well with Ed Hyman's I s I ever called 448 00:25:16,800 --> 00:25:19,920 Speaker 1: Terry um. Let me bring up a phrase which David 449 00:25:19,920 --> 00:25:23,000 Speaker 1: Gurry uses the other day. The President used it in 450 00:25:23,040 --> 00:25:30,359 Speaker 1: the testimony. What's a satellite associate? John Tucker? Are you 451 00:25:30,480 --> 00:25:38,280 Speaker 1: as satellitem? I as satellite associate? Spot Nick? What's a 452 00:25:38,359 --> 00:25:42,359 Speaker 1: satellite associate? Tom? I? I gotta say, I think of 453 00:25:42,440 --> 00:25:45,120 Speaker 1: you as one of the eight big planets rather than 454 00:25:46,200 --> 00:25:51,119 Speaker 1: than something in the asteroid belt from Pluto. Exactly, tell me, 455 00:25:51,600 --> 00:25:54,080 Speaker 1: satellite associate. I want Pluto to come back as a 456 00:25:54,119 --> 00:25:58,160 Speaker 1: full planet anyway. The satellite associate, I think, is anybody 457 00:25:58,160 --> 00:26:03,400 Speaker 1: else very simply? Uh, yeah, I don't know who. But 458 00:26:03,680 --> 00:26:06,400 Speaker 1: critically they're treated differently. The president is the president, whether 459 00:26:06,400 --> 00:26:10,119 Speaker 1: it's President Trump or President Garfield or President Jefferson. A 460 00:26:10,280 --> 00:26:15,439 Speaker 1: president has a different body of law, process, cadence, and 461 00:26:15,560 --> 00:26:20,720 Speaker 1: discourse right, uh, to some extent. But I think that 462 00:26:21,000 --> 00:26:23,480 Speaker 1: you know, if we learned, you know, but we have 463 00:26:23,520 --> 00:26:25,840 Speaker 1: to talk about Watergate at some point I think it's required. 464 00:26:26,520 --> 00:26:31,040 Speaker 1: But the uh, the Watergate analogy is appropriate here because 465 00:26:31,400 --> 00:26:35,479 Speaker 1: what we learned through Watergate and subsequently through a variety 466 00:26:35,520 --> 00:26:38,800 Speaker 1: of other Special Council investigations over the past forty years, 467 00:26:39,280 --> 00:26:42,720 Speaker 1: is that the body of law that applies to everybody 468 00:26:42,720 --> 00:26:46,080 Speaker 1: else by large, applies to the President. To David garr In. 469 00:26:46,080 --> 00:26:47,879 Speaker 1: Our Bloomberg nine on one studio is Tom Keene at 470 00:26:47,880 --> 00:26:50,040 Speaker 1: our headquarters in New York. This is Bloomberg Surveillance on 471 00:26:50,040 --> 00:26:52,480 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Radio. We're here with Terry Haynes, the senior political 472 00:26:52,520 --> 00:26:55,199 Speaker 1: strategist at EVER Corps. I s I and Terry I 473 00:26:55,200 --> 00:26:57,639 Speaker 1: think after the President did that joint speech before a 474 00:26:57,680 --> 00:27:00,159 Speaker 1: joint session of Congress, there was so much enthusiast him 475 00:27:00,160 --> 00:27:03,560 Speaker 1: about what he said about infrastructure in this country. Yesterday, 476 00:27:03,640 --> 00:27:06,800 Speaker 1: he was in Ohio, six miles east of Cincinnati on 477 00:27:06,840 --> 00:27:09,520 Speaker 1: the Ohio River. We saw the barges going by behind him, 478 00:27:09,520 --> 00:27:11,399 Speaker 1: and this was an opportunity for him to embrace what 479 00:27:11,480 --> 00:27:13,200 Speaker 1: was supposed to be, or what the White House wanted 480 00:27:13,240 --> 00:27:16,280 Speaker 1: to be Infrastructure Week. Instead, we had a twenty minute 481 00:27:16,280 --> 00:27:18,119 Speaker 1: wind up in which he talked about the Paris Accord, 482 00:27:18,119 --> 00:27:20,840 Speaker 1: his trip to Saudi Arabia. He talked about healthcare. Uh. 483 00:27:20,840 --> 00:27:23,000 Speaker 1: He finally got to infrastructure there at the end. But 484 00:27:23,480 --> 00:27:25,959 Speaker 1: UM for something the White House engineered wanted to be 485 00:27:26,600 --> 00:27:29,240 Speaker 1: the focus point this week, we really haven't gotten it. 486 00:27:29,280 --> 00:27:31,520 Speaker 1: We haven't gotten details on infrastructure from the White House. 487 00:27:31,960 --> 00:27:34,280 Speaker 1: I hate to draw the parallel here to tax reform, 488 00:27:34,359 --> 00:27:36,639 Speaker 1: but we're dealing with just a set of principles and 489 00:27:36,640 --> 00:27:41,760 Speaker 1: a little more. Yes, I realized, I realized that wasn't 490 00:27:41,760 --> 00:27:44,880 Speaker 1: a question. But I'm curious here just about we're talking 491 00:27:44,920 --> 00:27:47,800 Speaker 1: about agenda. Why hasn't the White House been better about 492 00:27:47,840 --> 00:27:50,840 Speaker 1: claiming that or reclaiming that agenda. I'm not often surprised, 493 00:27:50,880 --> 00:27:55,240 Speaker 1: but I am surprised by this. Uh. He had the 494 00:27:55,240 --> 00:28:01,320 Speaker 1: President has in Transpisitions Secretary Chow a very skilled operator, 495 00:28:01,480 --> 00:28:04,440 Speaker 1: not only on policy but on but on the ability 496 00:28:04,480 --> 00:28:09,160 Speaker 1: to bring political consensus. The infrastructure was one of the 497 00:28:09,200 --> 00:28:13,560 Speaker 1: top things that the President campaigned on. There's a lot 498 00:28:13,560 --> 00:28:19,280 Speaker 1: of enthusiasm about it among investors as well, and UH, 499 00:28:19,320 --> 00:28:22,199 Speaker 1: in the general public also and UH. And there are 500 00:28:22,200 --> 00:28:24,679 Speaker 1: a lot of promises made. And to be at a 501 00:28:24,680 --> 00:28:28,080 Speaker 1: point that's almost mid year and to not have a plan, 502 00:28:28,160 --> 00:28:31,480 Speaker 1: to not be engaging Congress on a bipartisan basis. UH, 503 00:28:31,520 --> 00:28:35,960 Speaker 1: and not moving forward UH is a surprise, and it 504 00:28:36,080 --> 00:28:41,560 Speaker 1: caused US UH this week to formally downgrade the chances 505 00:28:41,560 --> 00:28:46,360 Speaker 1: of infrastructure legislation until untillen. And that matters for a 506 00:28:46,400 --> 00:28:48,400 Speaker 1: couple of reasons. And one of the reasons it matters 507 00:28:48,800 --> 00:28:51,960 Speaker 1: is because infrastructure, unlike a lot of other government programs, 508 00:28:52,040 --> 00:28:54,440 Speaker 1: is not something where you merely splash out a bunch 509 00:28:54,480 --> 00:28:58,240 Speaker 1: of money and all of a sudden things start to happen. UH. 510 00:28:58,360 --> 00:29:04,240 Speaker 1: That that was shown very well in twenty nine during 511 00:29:04,280 --> 00:29:08,240 Speaker 1: after the stimulus, when lots of shove already jobs and 512 00:29:08,400 --> 00:29:12,440 Speaker 1: projects were we're promoted and thought to occur, and it 513 00:29:12,480 --> 00:29:15,000 Speaker 1: turns out a lot of that didn't happen, or happened 514 00:29:15,080 --> 00:29:18,040 Speaker 1: very slowly. Uh. These spend outs happen over a period 515 00:29:18,040 --> 00:29:22,240 Speaker 1: of two three five years. So so the delay here 516 00:29:22,920 --> 00:29:27,320 Speaker 1: is is consequential in a policy in a practical sense. 517 00:29:27,560 --> 00:29:32,360 Speaker 1: And UH and dramatically slows what the President said was 518 00:29:32,400 --> 00:29:34,880 Speaker 1: going to be one of his top priorities. It was 519 00:29:34,920 --> 00:29:36,920 Speaker 1: a free wheeling speech. As I said, there was a 520 00:29:36,920 --> 00:29:39,120 Speaker 1: moment where he brings up but Richard leftrack. There's the 521 00:29:39,120 --> 00:29:41,320 Speaker 1: head of Toronado Steve Roth there as well. He kind 522 00:29:41,360 --> 00:29:42,880 Speaker 1: of brings them up for an off the cuff, a 523 00:29:42,920 --> 00:29:45,680 Speaker 1: few off the cuff remarks, what does it say that 524 00:29:45,760 --> 00:29:48,560 Speaker 1: he didn't have surrounding this announcement. We're surrounding this week, 525 00:29:48,680 --> 00:29:51,400 Speaker 1: we have the panoply of business people we've seen before. 526 00:29:51,400 --> 00:29:54,360 Speaker 1: He's that an indication to you that what happened with 527 00:29:54,800 --> 00:29:56,920 Speaker 1: the Paris Agreement, what happened with the G seven sum, 528 00:29:56,920 --> 00:30:01,080 Speaker 1: it really has changed or turned or altered the way 529 00:30:01,120 --> 00:30:04,440 Speaker 1: that business leaders executives are are interfacing or interacting with 530 00:30:04,440 --> 00:30:07,960 Speaker 1: this administration. I think it's uh. I think that there's 531 00:30:07,960 --> 00:30:10,520 Speaker 1: some truth in that. I think it's also true, and 532 00:30:10,840 --> 00:30:12,880 Speaker 1: this is by inference, but I think this is it's 533 00:30:12,920 --> 00:30:16,800 Speaker 1: also true that for whatever reason, the administration is not 534 00:30:16,960 --> 00:30:20,520 Speaker 1: gathering up those folks and uh and and trying to 535 00:30:20,600 --> 00:30:22,920 Speaker 1: use them as a wedge for action. You know, one 536 00:30:22,920 --> 00:30:26,200 Speaker 1: thing that Congress always looks for when it's looking for 537 00:30:26,240 --> 00:30:31,120 Speaker 1: importance is not just importance and a priority in terms 538 00:30:31,120 --> 00:30:33,040 Speaker 1: of what they should do and how quickly they should do. 539 00:30:33,080 --> 00:30:35,720 Speaker 1: It is not just what the White House might want 540 00:30:35,880 --> 00:30:38,960 Speaker 1: or you know, how how the president's proposing something, but 541 00:30:39,040 --> 00:30:41,760 Speaker 1: also what kind of support it has out there in 542 00:30:41,800 --> 00:30:46,360 Speaker 1: the real world, uh, from business leaders, from investors, from 543 00:30:46,360 --> 00:30:50,600 Speaker 1: the general public, and so far they have not assembled 544 00:30:50,600 --> 00:30:53,600 Speaker 1: that at all. And it shows a lot of disarray 545 00:30:53,640 --> 00:30:58,400 Speaker 1: on policy. Start with the standard idea of why infrastructure 546 00:30:58,400 --> 00:31:01,120 Speaker 1: is such a struggle in Washington. It's just not in 547 00:31:01,200 --> 00:31:06,600 Speaker 1: my backyard. Nobody wants the budget in their backyard, isn't it. Um. Yeah, 548 00:31:06,680 --> 00:31:10,160 Speaker 1: it's partially that, but you know, it's awfully bipartisan in 549 00:31:10,240 --> 00:31:14,520 Speaker 1: many many ways. UH. For twenty thirty years and and 550 00:31:14,560 --> 00:31:19,480 Speaker 1: my my professional experience infrastructure policy, infrastructure legislation has always 551 00:31:19,480 --> 00:31:22,560 Speaker 1: been bipartisan. The last time we had the infrastructure legislation 552 00:31:23,200 --> 00:31:27,320 Speaker 1: most people don't know was just in December when there 553 00:31:27,400 --> 00:31:29,600 Speaker 1: was a new five year plan put into place that 554 00:31:29,680 --> 00:31:32,400 Speaker 1: was largely subsistence, but but it was agreed to on 555 00:31:32,400 --> 00:31:35,480 Speaker 1: a bipartisan basis. And what the President was talking about, 556 00:31:35,560 --> 00:31:37,720 Speaker 1: what Mrs Clinton was talking about during the campaign for 557 00:31:37,720 --> 00:31:41,120 Speaker 1: that matter, was it was a ramp up from that level. UH. 558 00:31:41,160 --> 00:31:44,960 Speaker 1: And there are and that includes both direct federal spending, 559 00:31:45,160 --> 00:31:47,280 Speaker 1: which we think can continue to think there's about three 560 00:31:47,680 --> 00:31:50,640 Speaker 1: billion available over three years, but also an expansion of 561 00:31:50,640 --> 00:31:54,960 Speaker 1: public private partnerships, all very bipartisan. UH. There. There's a 562 00:31:55,000 --> 00:31:57,640 Speaker 1: win politically speaking, there's a win out there to be had, 563 00:31:58,000 --> 00:32:00,800 Speaker 1: and uh, it is mildly prising to me that the 564 00:32:00,840 --> 00:32:04,880 Speaker 1: White House and the President aren't seizing that opportunity. Dr Hans, 565 00:32:04,880 --> 00:32:06,720 Speaker 1: thanks very much, appreciated it. Seen a political strategy that 566 00:32:06,960 --> 00:32:08,680 Speaker 1: Core and I side. Joining me here in our Bloomberg 567 00:32:08,720 --> 00:32:11,200 Speaker 1: Night on One studio in Washington, Tom, you're in your 568 00:32:11,200 --> 00:32:15,640 Speaker 1: Gucci gulch. I can spy it here from our studio 569 00:32:15,640 --> 00:32:18,400 Speaker 1: on the north the northeast quarter of the building. We've 570 00:32:18,440 --> 00:32:21,280 Speaker 1: got a press conference coming up in six moments. Matt 571 00:32:21,320 --> 00:32:25,280 Speaker 1: Miller and Estonia Tall in Estonia with Mr Dragon, Then 572 00:32:25,280 --> 00:32:28,719 Speaker 1: onto the comy testimony. This is Bloomberg. Stay with us. 573 00:32:42,360 --> 00:32:47,000 Speaker 1: I was watching Gabriel Euro weekend off inflation talk. You can, 574 00:32:47,360 --> 00:32:50,280 Speaker 1: folks hear the cadence of the words and look at 575 00:32:50,320 --> 00:32:54,000 Speaker 1: the Bloomberg and see things give way. There's a lot 576 00:32:54,000 --> 00:32:58,560 Speaker 1: of uncertainty about inflation right now, isn't there? Gabriel? Um, Yes, 577 00:32:58,640 --> 00:33:03,920 Speaker 1: there is um, But I think that's partly because UM 578 00:33:05,120 --> 00:33:09,680 Speaker 1: market participants want things to move steadily in one direction. 579 00:33:09,800 --> 00:33:13,880 Speaker 1: If inflation is rising, you would like inflation to keep rising. 580 00:33:13,920 --> 00:33:17,080 Speaker 1: If inflation is falling, you wanted to fall. You don't 581 00:33:17,200 --> 00:33:21,000 Speaker 1: want it to be on a vague but the ractic 582 00:33:21,200 --> 00:33:24,640 Speaker 1: upward trend, which which is my view of where we 583 00:33:24,720 --> 00:33:28,760 Speaker 1: are right now, and that is so in confusion, particularly 584 00:33:28,800 --> 00:33:34,000 Speaker 1: at the time when central banks still are concerned that 585 00:33:34,080 --> 00:33:39,960 Speaker 1: inflation may not be strong enough for them, and I 586 00:33:40,000 --> 00:33:45,400 Speaker 1: can understand market uncertainty. I think it's possibly exaggerated, Gabriel, 587 00:33:45,840 --> 00:33:49,800 Speaker 1: How effectively is the CCP is Mario drug TCP being patient, 588 00:33:50,120 --> 00:33:55,120 Speaker 1: confident and persistent. Well, he certainly is being persistent, that 589 00:33:55,480 --> 00:34:02,360 Speaker 1: projects confident, patient, is he? Well? I would actually look, 590 00:34:02,560 --> 00:34:07,160 Speaker 1: the ECB has done well in the sense that inflation 591 00:34:07,520 --> 00:34:12,040 Speaker 1: it headed towards targets. Compare this where we were two 592 00:34:12,120 --> 00:34:15,680 Speaker 1: or three years ago. Compare money and credit growth with 593 00:34:15,760 --> 00:34:17,759 Speaker 1: where we were two or three years ago. They've done 594 00:34:17,960 --> 00:34:21,560 Speaker 1: very well. However, I'm not entirely sure how much of 595 00:34:21,600 --> 00:34:23,880 Speaker 1: this is really the CB is doing. As you know, 596 00:34:23,960 --> 00:34:26,680 Speaker 1: I'm a monitorist. I look at money and credit data. 597 00:34:27,440 --> 00:34:31,200 Speaker 1: Broad money started growing quite rapidly and started picking up 598 00:34:31,200 --> 00:34:34,719 Speaker 1: in the Euro Area before the CD started its assets 599 00:34:34,719 --> 00:34:37,560 Speaker 1: as a purchases, so it may have been helped by it, 600 00:34:38,160 --> 00:34:42,040 Speaker 1: But that deflation was no longer a threat, that was 601 00:34:42,080 --> 00:34:45,920 Speaker 1: already clear three years ago. I think the CBS policies helping. 602 00:34:45,960 --> 00:34:49,839 Speaker 1: I don't think it's doing any harm um, but it's 603 00:34:49,880 --> 00:34:52,719 Speaker 1: also very clear in spite of what Mr Drug He says, 604 00:34:52,760 --> 00:34:55,960 Speaker 1: that there is a lively debate inside the CB where 605 00:34:56,000 --> 00:34:59,760 Speaker 1: particularly the Germans are not happy with ultra low interest, 606 00:35:00,560 --> 00:35:03,200 Speaker 1: with what they perceived to be bailing out of foreigner. 607 00:35:03,719 --> 00:35:06,480 Speaker 1: I'm watching the screen here, folks, and there is some 608 00:35:06,520 --> 00:35:09,799 Speaker 1: correlation going on in a weaker euro. Gabriel, We've got 609 00:35:09,840 --> 00:35:13,120 Speaker 1: time for one final question this morning. As you mentioned 610 00:35:13,160 --> 00:35:16,239 Speaker 1: that the Germans are watching this, I'm looking at a 611 00:35:16,400 --> 00:35:20,200 Speaker 1: rollover in the German two year to further negative low rates. No, 612 00:35:20,360 --> 00:35:23,480 Speaker 1: not the record lows that we saw in February, the 613 00:35:23,560 --> 00:35:26,960 Speaker 1: last week of February, but the last week or ten 614 00:35:27,040 --> 00:35:30,800 Speaker 1: days or fourteen days has been ugly for the German 615 00:35:30,840 --> 00:35:34,560 Speaker 1: two year to lower negative rates. How does the Bundesbank 616 00:35:34,680 --> 00:35:42,480 Speaker 1: perceive that it's a look Apart from being concerned, I 617 00:35:42,520 --> 00:35:46,080 Speaker 1: think that they're they're obviously worried about what it means 618 00:35:46,160 --> 00:35:48,920 Speaker 1: in terms of what is it markets perceived that they 619 00:35:48,960 --> 00:35:52,200 Speaker 1: don't perceive. The Bundesbank sees inflation is picking up the 620 00:35:52,200 --> 00:35:55,120 Speaker 1: economy is in great guns. We want hire interest rates, 621 00:35:55,760 --> 00:35:59,759 Speaker 1: wild markets incapable of taking that on board if you 622 00:35:59,800 --> 00:36:02,080 Speaker 1: don't new months ago. A month ago I would have 623 00:36:02,080 --> 00:36:05,800 Speaker 1: said it's political answer. Should no longer be the case. 624 00:36:07,360 --> 00:36:10,359 Speaker 1: I think the Bundesbank is as confused as we are. 625 00:36:10,440 --> 00:36:13,840 Speaker 1: But I also think the Bundesbank is happy with d 626 00:36:14,040 --> 00:36:17,040 Speaker 1: CV for all it's a doubbish tone having made at 627 00:36:17,120 --> 00:36:22,000 Speaker 1: least one tiny little hawkish move. Well, Gabriel got to 628 00:36:22,040 --> 00:36:24,960 Speaker 1: cut it off there. Gabriel Stein with r G forecast 629 00:36:25,080 --> 00:36:27,760 Speaker 1: r G, thank you so much, greatly appreciate you staying around. 630 00:36:40,160 --> 00:36:43,680 Speaker 1: Marty Schenker joining the Center studios in Washington and one 631 00:36:43,760 --> 00:36:47,120 Speaker 1: of them studios he has had all of government and 632 00:36:47,239 --> 00:36:49,799 Speaker 1: politics today. He is supposed to be at a heart 633 00:36:49,840 --> 00:36:53,520 Speaker 1: to sixteen, but fell on the general's sword and gave 634 00:36:53,560 --> 00:36:57,560 Speaker 1: it up for two corporals, colonel and a couple of 635 00:36:57,640 --> 00:37:01,279 Speaker 1: first lieutenants who may not survive party. If before we 636 00:37:01,360 --> 00:37:04,120 Speaker 1: go to Greg Villier, if you were hard to sixteen, 637 00:37:04,200 --> 00:37:07,200 Speaker 1: what would you be listening for today? Well, you know 638 00:37:07,360 --> 00:37:11,320 Speaker 1: the key thing is, is there anything in in Comy's 639 00:37:11,360 --> 00:37:14,040 Speaker 1: back pocket that he is wheld and it's just waiting 640 00:37:14,080 --> 00:37:17,160 Speaker 1: for the right question to provide it um. He has 641 00:37:17,239 --> 00:37:20,680 Speaker 1: a history of doing that kind of thing. Whether that 642 00:37:20,760 --> 00:37:24,080 Speaker 1: will happen today, that will be the key thing. Is 643 00:37:24,080 --> 00:37:26,479 Speaker 1: there anything new? Thank you so much Morty for joining 644 00:37:26,560 --> 00:37:28,759 Speaker 1: us today. Let's dive into some questions joining us now. 645 00:37:29,120 --> 00:37:31,480 Speaker 1: There is only one guest we can have right now, 646 00:37:32,040 --> 00:37:35,839 Speaker 1: and as Gregory Valier of Horizon Investments. What I love 647 00:37:35,920 --> 00:37:38,600 Speaker 1: to do greg in your morning note for Horizon is 648 00:37:38,680 --> 00:37:42,560 Speaker 1: going and find the one classic Valier sentence, and there 649 00:37:42,640 --> 00:37:48,200 Speaker 1: it is wild cards? Does anyone have anything on tape? Oh? 650 00:37:48,360 --> 00:37:52,080 Speaker 1: You Watergate type? You? I mean, that's the kind of bombshell. 651 00:37:52,480 --> 00:37:55,839 Speaker 1: Can we really find out today if there's something on tape? Oh? 652 00:37:56,000 --> 00:37:59,160 Speaker 1: John dene Well, I sort of agree with Marty. I 653 00:37:59,200 --> 00:38:01,640 Speaker 1: think he made a very point. There could be a 654 00:38:01,719 --> 00:38:05,760 Speaker 1: wild card here. In addition to tape. What about the leakers, 655 00:38:05,800 --> 00:38:08,920 Speaker 1: who were the leaders? What were their motives? What about 656 00:38:09,480 --> 00:38:15,080 Speaker 1: you know these are salacious sex tapes? What about financial entanglements. 657 00:38:15,120 --> 00:38:17,560 Speaker 1: There's a lot that could come up during Q and A. 658 00:38:17,960 --> 00:38:23,320 Speaker 1: What does he do when these embarrassing questions are sensitive questions, 659 00:38:23,360 --> 00:38:26,560 Speaker 1: I should say, are asked? Does he plead the fifth? 660 00:38:26,640 --> 00:38:29,120 Speaker 1: Does he plead the seventh, what does he you know, 661 00:38:29,760 --> 00:38:33,280 Speaker 1: what's he do? Well? His silence would speak volumes, wouldn't 662 00:38:33,320 --> 00:38:36,960 Speaker 1: it if he refuses to answer a question about uh 663 00:38:37,160 --> 00:38:40,920 Speaker 1: manaforts or you know, there's so many angles to this story. Uh. 664 00:38:41,080 --> 00:38:43,160 Speaker 1: If Comey says and then no, I can't go there, 665 00:38:43,480 --> 00:38:46,480 Speaker 1: I think it'll just raise suspicions even more. Let me 666 00:38:46,560 --> 00:38:49,239 Speaker 1: bring in my colleague in Washington with Greg del here 667 00:38:49,400 --> 00:38:53,640 Speaker 1: is Marty Schenker, Marty, Yeah, Well, among other things, UH 668 00:38:55,360 --> 00:39:00,800 Speaker 1: like Watergate, these hearings do tend to bring some of 669 00:39:00,880 --> 00:39:04,600 Speaker 1: the senators themselves, the questioners in focus. And if you 670 00:39:05,040 --> 00:39:06,879 Speaker 1: for those of us who remember the water get here 671 00:39:06,960 --> 00:39:12,000 Speaker 1: in sam Irvin became basically a cultural star through his 672 00:39:13,080 --> 00:39:16,800 Speaker 1: his his questioning during the water Game party. Villier was 673 00:39:16,880 --> 00:39:20,600 Speaker 1: too young a command I wish, but it will be 674 00:39:20,640 --> 00:39:23,720 Speaker 1: interesting to see who kind of pops on that screen today. 675 00:39:24,400 --> 00:39:26,120 Speaker 1: You know what I'm going to look for, guys, is 676 00:39:26,239 --> 00:39:30,120 Speaker 1: the Republicans. We all pretty much know the Democrats will 677 00:39:30,160 --> 00:39:33,000 Speaker 1: be scathing, but I thought it was interesting. Last night, 678 00:39:33,080 --> 00:39:36,040 Speaker 1: Paul Ryan was quite critical of Trump. He said it 679 00:39:36,120 --> 00:39:40,880 Speaker 1: was inappropriate for uh for Trump to ask Comey to 680 00:39:41,120 --> 00:39:43,719 Speaker 1: stop the investigation of Flynn, so let's see if this 681 00:39:43,800 --> 00:39:47,560 Speaker 1: starts a trend of Republicans who get critical. Let me 682 00:39:47,600 --> 00:39:49,799 Speaker 1: paint the picture right now, Marty. Another question for Greg 683 00:39:50,000 --> 00:39:52,640 Speaker 1: l but first looking at her to sixteen off our 684 00:39:52,680 --> 00:39:56,640 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Studio monitors here for those of you radio worldwide 685 00:39:56,680 --> 00:39:59,560 Speaker 1: and coast to coast, it is a enormous room. You 686 00:39:59,600 --> 00:40:02,320 Speaker 1: could play a Predators Penguin hockey game in it, with 687 00:40:02,520 --> 00:40:06,560 Speaker 1: about a hundred photographers milling around waiting for the next image. 688 00:40:06,600 --> 00:40:09,360 Speaker 1: The empty seat of Mr Komy and all the senators, 689 00:40:09,719 --> 00:40:11,880 Speaker 1: none of them have set yet. And above are the 690 00:40:11,960 --> 00:40:15,080 Speaker 1: boxes David Gurrow was talking about where the media will 691 00:40:15,120 --> 00:40:19,200 Speaker 1: look down behind Mr Komy is I'm making a joke 692 00:40:19,440 --> 00:40:25,080 Speaker 1: acres of people like Marty Schenker. Ready to listen, Marty, Marty, 693 00:40:25,840 --> 00:40:28,560 Speaker 1: question for Greg please, but Marty, really, all that's missing 694 00:40:28,640 --> 00:40:31,520 Speaker 1: from the days of Senator Urban and Senator Baker is 695 00:40:31,560 --> 00:40:36,800 Speaker 1: a cigar smoke. Yeah, that's right. Uh, it is definitely 696 00:40:36,960 --> 00:40:41,480 Speaker 1: riveting this town. And I would say in most businesses 697 00:40:41,520 --> 00:40:44,759 Speaker 1: across America or anybody who's at home, they're gonna be 698 00:40:44,840 --> 00:40:48,880 Speaker 1: watching this and uh that has that has a lot 699 00:40:48,960 --> 00:40:52,800 Speaker 1: of risks for this president, right because everybody will be 700 00:40:52,960 --> 00:40:56,880 Speaker 1: turning on every word. And if, in case there is 701 00:40:57,080 --> 00:41:00,239 Speaker 1: a wild card that comes out, it's gonna be through 702 00:41:00,320 --> 00:41:03,719 Speaker 1: social media, just wildfire, not just here in the US, 703 00:41:03,800 --> 00:41:06,279 Speaker 1: but around the world. And if I could add something, guys, 704 00:41:06,640 --> 00:41:10,480 Speaker 1: political capital is so important in this town. There's a 705 00:41:10,520 --> 00:41:13,719 Speaker 1: poll out this morning showing Trump's job approval rating down 706 00:41:13,760 --> 00:41:17,560 Speaker 1: to thirty percent. If he gets under thirty this summer, 707 00:41:17,920 --> 00:41:20,239 Speaker 1: his political capital will be such that a lot of 708 00:41:20,320 --> 00:41:25,400 Speaker 1: Republicans will abandon him. And that has implications for policy, 709 00:41:25,560 --> 00:41:27,480 Speaker 1: right because he has a lot of things on his 710 00:41:27,600 --> 00:41:30,440 Speaker 1: plate up front of Congress. Here we are with Greg 711 00:41:30,600 --> 00:41:33,880 Speaker 1: Ville and Marty Shanker waiting for the testimony. It's a 712 00:41:33,960 --> 00:41:37,880 Speaker 1: good uh twenty four minutes. Greg, Let me get in 713 00:41:37,960 --> 00:41:39,759 Speaker 1: one more question here, if I could I guess the 714 00:41:39,800 --> 00:41:43,000 Speaker 1: President's going to tweet and make a response. How's the 715 00:41:43,080 --> 00:41:46,840 Speaker 1: White House doing and organizing the president's day? Dann Balls 716 00:41:47,280 --> 00:41:51,000 Speaker 1: I thought wrote a really terse column in the Washington 717 00:41:51,080 --> 00:41:54,279 Speaker 1: Post last night of a president alone. What's the level 718 00:41:54,320 --> 00:41:57,680 Speaker 1: of aloneness as we go to a testimony, we may 719 00:41:57,760 --> 00:42:02,240 Speaker 1: find out Tom because early Trump's lawyers and his intimates, 720 00:42:02,280 --> 00:42:06,160 Speaker 1: maybe including Avanka, has told him do not tweet today. 721 00:42:06,600 --> 00:42:09,719 Speaker 1: If he tries to refute every point that Comy makes 722 00:42:10,040 --> 00:42:12,360 Speaker 1: that could be used against him down the road. So 723 00:42:12,480 --> 00:42:14,200 Speaker 1: I think an awful lot of people close to him 724 00:42:14,200 --> 00:42:17,160 Speaker 1: are saying, take our advice. So we'll find out he's 725 00:42:17,200 --> 00:42:20,839 Speaker 1: not known to take anybody's advice. I would be very 726 00:42:20,880 --> 00:42:24,600 Speaker 1: surprised to see him tweet in real time, given the 727 00:42:24,680 --> 00:42:27,440 Speaker 1: fact that you know, our reporting is that his personal 728 00:42:27,520 --> 00:42:30,680 Speaker 1: attorney is sitting there, were watching with him and his 729 00:42:30,840 --> 00:42:33,279 Speaker 1: legal team, and it would seem to me the moment 730 00:42:33,360 --> 00:42:37,319 Speaker 1: he raises his iPhone, they're going to say put that down. Yep. 731 00:42:38,200 --> 00:42:49,840 Speaker 1: Easier said than done, right. Thanks for listening to the 732 00:42:49,880 --> 00:42:56,719 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Subscribe and listen to interviews on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, 733 00:42:57,120 --> 00:43:00,920 Speaker 1: or whichever podcast platform you prefer. I'm on Twitter at 734 00:43:00,960 --> 00:43:05,640 Speaker 1: Tom Keene. David Gura is at David Gura. Before the podcast, 735 00:43:05,960 --> 00:43:20,479 Speaker 1: you could always catch us worldwide. I'm Bloomberg Radio. Runt 736 00:43:20,520 --> 00:43:24,040 Speaker 1: you by Bank of America Mary Lynch. With virtual reality, 737 00:43:24,320 --> 00:43:29,680 Speaker 1: virtually everything will change. Discover opportunities in a transforming world, 738 00:43:30,120 --> 00:43:34,399 Speaker 1: be of a mL dot Com, slash VR, Mary Lynch, 739 00:43:34,520 --> 00:43:36,840 Speaker 1: Pierced Fenner and Smith Incorporated,