Speaker 1: Watch up and welcome back to another episode of No
Speaker 1: Sealers Podcast with your host. Now, fuck that with your
Speaker 1: low glasses, Malone.
Speaker 2: Just the obvious nature of you know, the tail.
Speaker 3: Mm hmm.
Speaker 1: What Oh you're saying, what happened the story that that?
Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, there's no real way to work around it,
Speaker 2: you know what I mean.
Speaker 1: So we did a live stream, Tony, and the live
Speaker 1: stream what we're recording now right, this is the audio
Speaker 1: so he can see you, you can you know, so
Speaker 1: you can see you, so you know your finish.
Speaker 2: We're gonna get a monitor. S has to look at mind.
Speaker 3: I'm gonna get a monitor for them. He can see
Speaker 3: so you can see him over there.
Speaker 2: You picked a good time to come before the monitor
Speaker 2: got put up.
Speaker 1: So we did a live stream and it was based
Speaker 1: off a conversation I was having with one of my
Speaker 1: young homies, my my little brother a d He has
Speaker 1: a stream, a live stream called the Community with my
Speaker 1: homeboy pun and we were having a conversation about what
Speaker 1: was going on with Dirt. Dirk got arrested for murder
Speaker 1: for hire. Dirk was a rapper in Chicago, you know exactly,
Speaker 1: and he was saying that the beef Dirk and young Boy.
Speaker 3: Their cruise started over a girl.
Speaker 1: They were sleeping with the same girls, and you know,
Speaker 1: some happened somewhere along the line. They got loos and
Speaker 1: people start talking crazy and everybody's cruise. People around the
Speaker 1: cruise start talking crazy. So now it's King Von who
Speaker 1: was part of Dirk's cruise. Was Quan Toronto was a
Speaker 1: part of Young with They were all cool at first,
Speaker 1: and they start are talking crazy to each other, you
Speaker 1: know what I'm saying.
Speaker 3: And they go to Atlanta and the Chicago brothers go
Speaker 3: to Atlanta, ron and they get into a confrontation with
Speaker 3: Rondos his life. Yes, so.
Speaker 1: Quando Rondo you know, year a year or two later,
Speaker 1: comes to California to do some business and his transportation
Speaker 1: that he's riding in through to do the business within
Speaker 1: the city. They near Century City. The whole truck get shot.
Speaker 1: Were fully automatic weapons, okay. And that's the charge that
Speaker 1: Dirk is, you know, being in dice that he organized
Speaker 1: that he economically financed that that happened. Okay, So they
Speaker 1: got supposed to be allegedly is the shooters and have
Speaker 1: him for murder for hire. He was a d My
Speaker 1: little brother was telling me that was a lot to
Speaker 1: go through, you know, over a girl, and I'm like, well,
Speaker 1: it's not really over the girl, you know what I mean,
Speaker 1: It's really over the stuff people say around the girl.
Speaker 1: We start having a conversation and I was saying, like,
Speaker 1: if if we're together, you, if somebody sleeps with you
Speaker 1: and they know I exist, they know me, No, they
Speaker 1: don't have to be my friend. If they know me
Speaker 1: and they know we're together and they sleep with you,
Speaker 1: not only are you disrespecting me, they're disrespecting me right.
Speaker 3: And I believe in the universe where.
Speaker 1: If people disrespect you purposely, they will keep doing it right,
Speaker 1: So the harmonious thing to do is to erase you
Speaker 1: off the planet. Okay, not the vengeful thing, because vengeance
Speaker 1: would be that I'm doing it because you did this.
Speaker 1: The harmonious thing is, in my mind, is you will
Speaker 1: keep disrespecting me because you should have respect for me.
Speaker 1: I haven't did anything to you for you to disrespect
Speaker 1: me the hormone. The justice thing would be to erase
Speaker 1: you off this planet, so you can't keep deflating who
Speaker 1: I am every day by taking advantage of whoever whatever
Speaker 1: goodness you think lies inside of me. And that's the
Speaker 1: difference between vengeance and street justice, right, because you have
Speaker 1: regular societal justice where everybody agrees on laws, and then
Speaker 1: they have prisons and courts and juries and prisons and
Speaker 1: jails to help them issue out that level of harmony
Speaker 1: through justice. Well, in the streets there's the same space.
Speaker 1: And we were talking about Dirk situation and saying it.
Speaker 3: Was more.
Speaker 1: You started to pursue it differently, like there is a
Speaker 1: level of street justice that should happen, but street justice
Speaker 1: again is still as harmonious as anything else. It's like
Speaker 1: when you go to a real courthouse and instead of
Speaker 1: you like R.
Speaker 3: Kelly or Puff right.
Speaker 1: Where instead of them being held accountable, like Puff should
Speaker 1: be held accountable for combing his old lady here in
Speaker 1: the hotel lobby and da da da, and that should
Speaker 1: be like if they have a federal assault charge or
Speaker 1: the solicitation of prostitution, those are all fair charges, you know,
Speaker 1: possession of drugs, possession of guns, those are fair charges
Speaker 1: based off of evidence versus them railroading him with a
Speaker 1: rico where it's a racketeering charge for organization and there's
Speaker 1: only one person being charge, so that would be a
Speaker 1: one person organization.
Speaker 3: Same for R.
Speaker 1: Kelly, where instead of him just being charged for child
Speaker 1: pornography because if you sleep with a girl under the
Speaker 1: age of sixteen on a camera, you know, it don't matter,
Speaker 1: she can't consent. It's child for not even federally, which
Speaker 1: carries seven years and other stuff which R Kelly should
Speaker 1: be in prison eight to twelve years fee me. But
Speaker 1: because you allow white folks to carry out vengeance against
Speaker 1: a nasty thing that they have against brothers in this
Speaker 1: country since they was buying them by the dozens. You know,
Speaker 1: in Virginia, you have people mistreating and you have a
Speaker 1: like a like a trail of vengeance that's happening where
Speaker 1: it's all mistreatment.
Speaker 3: So instead of R.
Speaker 1: Kelly getting the eight to twelve years that he deserves
Speaker 1: based off the crime, he gets more time than Sammy
Speaker 1: the boy Girvano has for murdering you know, nineteen people.
Speaker 3: He almost has.
Speaker 1: Forty years instead of R Kelly, you know, getting eight
Speaker 1: to fifteen years for you know, having a consistent history
Speaker 1: of soliciting prostitution and.
Speaker 3: You know, using drugs or possessing.
Speaker 1: Drugs or having guns with serial numbers scratched off, which
Speaker 1: carries ten years federally or any that stuff, so that
Speaker 1: eight to fifteen years that he should be facing, he's
Speaker 1: facing life. That's to me, white vengeance or systemic vengeance,
Speaker 1: you know, like we still can get these niggas.
Speaker 3: When we can.
Speaker 4: Yeah.
Speaker 1: And he was just saying to me and Pete like, Okay,
Speaker 1: well that sucker if you do that over your girl,
Speaker 1: because a girl gonna be a whole and you shouldn't
Speaker 1: be mad at no man. I'm like, well, I wouldn't
Speaker 1: be upset at the man for what old lady is.
Speaker 1: I'd be upset at the man for disrespecting me knowing
Speaker 1: that this is my lady. And he was saying like, oh, well,
Speaker 1: you know you don't you disrespect that given his earn.
Speaker 1: I'm like, that's street, that's not real. Like you should
Speaker 1: respect every man even before they've earned it. You should
Speaker 1: only disrespect the man that you've lost respect for. Ye
Speaker 1: But if you disrespect the man that immediately in y'all
Speaker 1: first interaction, you know what I mean, you could take
Speaker 1: advantage of that. And so Pete was gonna give me
Speaker 1: a story. Fast forward again to the Baby Mama, where
Speaker 1: he felt like, oh, well, if my friend sleeps with
Speaker 1: my baby mother. And I'm like, well, what difference do
Speaker 1: it make if y'all lot together, Like why does that body? Well,
Speaker 1: he's beentraying our friendship. Like how He's like, well, you know,
Speaker 1: I don't care about her, but he will be portraying
Speaker 1: our friendship. I'm like, well, if you don't care about her,
Speaker 1: and Pete was asking the same thing, you.
Speaker 3: Don't care about her?
Speaker 1: Yeah, right, and this is your friend and he has
Speaker 1: positive intentions for this woman, why does it bother? And
Speaker 1: what I was telling Pete and I was telling still
Speaker 1: on the live stream, the truth is you love her,
Speaker 1: And he was like, well no, because I'm not sleeping
Speaker 1: with the once we break up. I'm like, sleeping with
Speaker 1: somebody is not with love is about that's self gratifying.
Speaker 3: Like you can make that type of act about somebody else,
Speaker 3: but for the most part, it's self gratifying. When you
Speaker 3: have to do things for people and you get nothing,
Speaker 3: it's true love. And I'm like, the reality is you
Speaker 3: love her still and it's like, oh, well, why would
Speaker 3: I love her, you know, just because we had a kid.
Speaker 1: I'm like yes, And me and Pete were just talking
Speaker 1: to him, you know, and Obviously, the audience that's listening
Speaker 1: to the stream immediately went to a space like where
Speaker 1: they must stand by this versus us saying if you
Speaker 1: don't care trying to get him to say you love
Speaker 1: your kid's mother, which could make you think twice about
Speaker 1: just getting somebody pregnant or at.
Speaker 2: Least want I mean, if not love, at least can
Speaker 2: see that you want her on some degree.
Speaker 1: I think you love them. I think I don't care
Speaker 1: what nobody say. There's no way possible somebody can give
Speaker 1: you extended lineage on the planet Earth and you don't
Speaker 1: love them for it.
Speaker 3: M it's just don't. I don't believe, and nobody who
Speaker 3: says they don't. You could be angry as hell and
Speaker 3: you love them.
Speaker 1: Because you share a whole bloodline with that person. I've
Speaker 1: had many conversations with people about this. You know, I
Speaker 1: mean that when you get a woman pregnant, you know
Speaker 1: what I mean. She is now a part of your family.
Speaker 3: Now.
Speaker 1: Where you classify her is based off of your understanding
Speaker 1: of what's happening here.
Speaker 3: But a lot of.
Speaker 1: People, you know, the reason girls have told me that
Speaker 1: they dated me in a past.
Speaker 3: Multiple girls said, well, you don't have no kids. I
Speaker 3: wouldn't date nobody with kids, mind you, all of them
Speaker 3: have kids. But that's also they.
Speaker 1: Know the dynamic between men and women, not just because
Speaker 1: they may have been in relationship with somebody at kids
Speaker 1: and each YID you know your dynamic with your kids father,
Speaker 1: and you don't want nobody to feel that way how
Speaker 1: you feel because you ain't gonna make because they would
Speaker 1: use theyself as the automatic, you know, reference point. Like
Speaker 1: if it was like, well, I hate my baby daddy,
Speaker 1: so I ain't really worry because you can hate your
Speaker 1: baby dad too, but you gonna reference it off the
Speaker 1: situation where somebody was sleeping with their baby mom. That's
Speaker 1: because you probably sleep with your baby dad. No seilings,
Speaker 1: g hell brother Peter Boss in the house. I got
Speaker 1: a really special guest say how Tony people share her voice? Hell,
Speaker 1: Tony don't really like to talk with She's brilliant, really brilliant,
Speaker 1: says high school. So we wanted him to admit he
Speaker 1: loved his baby mother. And it's so hard for men
Speaker 1: to admit that. Yo, coming from the poor places we
Speaker 1: come from, Like it's like, you don't want anybody to
Speaker 1: date this woman. Y'all want to run around and impregnate
Speaker 1: all the girls from our community.
Speaker 3: You don't want to marry them, but you don't want
Speaker 3: nobody that.
Speaker 1: You know to marry them out of some sense of
Speaker 1: which I don't quite know what it is.
Speaker 3: Unless you said you love her.
Speaker 1: I would rather a friend tell me, hey, I love her,
Speaker 1: and it's like I can't be with her, but I
Speaker 1: love her. I wouldn't understand that. But if you say
Speaker 1: you don't care, shouldn't matter who decides to make an
Speaker 1: honest woman.
Speaker 2: Out of.
Speaker 4: Yeah, but it's the friend. It's a friend's intention to
Speaker 4: wife her or just to have relations with her to
Speaker 4: be the issue, because now it's like we're sharing chip, Sorry,
Speaker 4: we're sharing like I would never want somebody to be
Speaker 4: able to And I've had this happen like a friend
Speaker 4: of mine, No, no, not a friend of mine. I
Speaker 4: was really close with my son's father's girlfriend. And when
Speaker 4: she started to talk about him, the way in which
Speaker 4: she talked about him, it was like, you know, well,
Speaker 4: he's this and he's that. She didn't, you know, describe
Speaker 4: anything intimate that they had, but she described like the
Speaker 4: way he treated her, the things that he did, and
Speaker 4: it was just like, you know, so now you have
Speaker 4: this comparison system, But guys do things their comparisons with
Speaker 4: like women they share is totally different. Like you know,
Speaker 4: so you know if you had and that's why they
Speaker 4: disrespect in a Like if I was with you and
Speaker 4: then I find out that you were with my friend, Yeah,
Speaker 4: we would have to have some kind of it would
Speaker 4: really be an issue because what if she starts to
Speaker 4: tell me like yeah, you know, well, all I can
Speaker 4: do is like when I close my eyes, I just
Speaker 4: remember how you hit me from the back, and it's
Speaker 4: just like I don't want to share that with my friend,
Speaker 4: Like I don't want you to have any type of
Speaker 4: dealings with something that I've had. So that's why it
Speaker 4: would always be an issue with a friend having why
Speaker 4: because who wants to talk about that difference?
Speaker 3: Does it make y'all would share a play the food?
Speaker 4: No, but men aren't food. Women aren't food.
Speaker 1: I mean, you're you're not really with the person, you
Speaker 1: just slept with them.
Speaker 4: But see that's the thing. That's why I brought up
Speaker 4: the thing that I told my son like that, how
Speaker 4: that's how everyone treats people like things like a oh
Speaker 4: you know what, like I hit that like oh, I
Speaker 4: smashed and that's it. But there's real like emotions that
Speaker 4: came with it. So even though we try to displace
Speaker 4: them in act like they're not there, if someone came
Speaker 4: back later and was like yeah, you know, and then
Speaker 4: described in detail, but not only is she like, she's
Speaker 4: not just your girlfriend, that's your kid's mom, so you know,
Speaker 4: like everything that you did with her, and then the
Speaker 4: friends telling you, like the sun, no, it's just horrible,
Speaker 4: it's horrible.
Speaker 1: So that's why you have to but even less examine
Speaker 1: that deeper. Why would that bother you just because she
Speaker 1: had the same penis you at if it's not your
Speaker 1: husband or your boyfriend or your man, it was just
Speaker 1: somebody you was just knocking down.
Speaker 4: Because I personally have a code, and I really stick.
Speaker 1: I know I heard this cold, but I'm asking you,
Speaker 1: why does the code exist?
Speaker 3: This is what me and Pete was pressing ad about.
Speaker 2: So you understood what the hell I was trying to
Speaker 2: ask at the very least, yes, thank you God.
Speaker 3: Enough.
Speaker 1: I kept answering it because people don't want to be
Speaker 1: honest about what happens during sex, true, so they also
Speaker 1: want to use it as a tool of nothingness, as
Speaker 1: an exercise until it's time for somebody else to use
Speaker 1: the same jim equipment that they know, which means we
Speaker 1: can have an even greater conversation about what's happening, which
Speaker 1: the same conversations lie in pregnancies, where people keep acting
Speaker 1: like it's a woman's choice, it's her body. It's not
Speaker 1: about a body, it's about the person inside of her body.
Speaker 3: Right. So again, it's so much, it's.
Speaker 1: So many like nuances that we will skip over for
Speaker 1: the sake of silliness until it's time to have now
Speaker 1: the same full conversation. Let's flush out everything. So that's
Speaker 1: what I was saying to him, And but I digress
Speaker 1: though what I was saying about that situation with Dirk.
Speaker 1: If the things are true that they're saying, I couldn't
Speaker 1: judge him because if somebody did something to my friend,
Speaker 1: I would probably, you know, look for a harmonious way.
Speaker 3: Too, especially if I think.
Speaker 1: But but so there's a few things right, like because
Speaker 1: he wasn't there to really like, I won't let my
Speaker 1: friends get in trouble, like if I if I if
Speaker 1: I got a couple guys I got from the streets
Speaker 1: that came up, how I came up. I wouldn't go
Speaker 1: through whatever to keep them out of trouble. I wouldn't
Speaker 1: let them get in trouble. Like like if I had
Speaker 1: a situation with a rapper and then we were somewhere
Speaker 1: where that rapper is that, I'm not going to put
Speaker 1: them in a.
Speaker 3: Situation to where they need to react that way.
Speaker 1: I'll just with it on my own at another time.
Speaker 1: But the difference between I think street justice and revenge
Speaker 1: is revenges starts being emotional and it starts being about payback, like, Okay,
Speaker 1: somebody hurt me, so I need to hurt them, versus
Speaker 1: my mind state is like I need to make sure
Speaker 1: somebody don't keep hurting. So it's only going to be
Speaker 1: specific things that I'm going to respond to, you know
Speaker 1: what I mean, Like respond to or if I think
Speaker 1: I'm gonna say somebody life, Like if I teach you
Speaker 1: this lesson, it might say your life. So if you
Speaker 1: do something to me, I'm like, you know what, that
Speaker 1: might get you killed another time. So I might, you know,
Speaker 1: hit you upside your head so you realize this could
Speaker 1: be worse next time. Okay, I really believe in injustice,
Speaker 1: you know what I mean? And I don't think America's
Speaker 1: sense of justice is more superior in minds. I don't
Speaker 1: care what society agrees with, and that's what everybody pretty
Speaker 1: much gets mistake about.
Speaker 4: Or yeah, but I mean we're we're fundamentally tall to
Speaker 4: put it in the hands of someone else. That's that's
Speaker 4: why people implement the police when something happens, instead of
Speaker 4: you trying to find your way to solve it, and
Speaker 4: you give it to the courts. Like you know, if
Speaker 4: something happens to your child, you're like, oh, well, you know,
Speaker 4: I'll report them instead of saying, you know what I
Speaker 4: like I have I've told my children, like if something
Speaker 4: happens to you the way that that's handled, you may
Speaker 4: not like the timeline, but you know, people come up
Speaker 4: missing every day, you know. But I wouldn't say that
Speaker 4: I'm gonna sit and wait because you have a justice
Speaker 4: system that a play in your face. You know, something
Speaker 4: will happen to your child that Harry's a life sentence
Speaker 4: to them, a mission you know, emotionally and mentally, and
Speaker 4: they tell them five years you know, so this person
Speaker 4: walk away unaware of the told that they've taken on
Speaker 4: your child's life. But you, as a parent, it's up
Speaker 4: to you to make sure that they really feel that.
Speaker 4: And and and people around them actually feel that. I'm
Speaker 4: not a person who you know in the Japanese, Uh,
Speaker 4: they're there. They have a thing where they kill off
Speaker 4: the whole family line. And and some people are are
Speaker 4: worthy of like some crimes they've committed, Like there should
Speaker 4: be no one after you. You shouldn't have children, you
Speaker 4: shouldn't have cousins. You your line is bad, you know.
Speaker 4: But we'll say nay, who But we say, you know,
Speaker 4: you know, let them spend life in jail, or you know,
Speaker 4: we give it to God, or we do a lot
Speaker 4: of things that that we should take upon ourselves to
Speaker 4: like handle so that my child will know like, Okay,
Speaker 4: my mom did that. You know. So I'm really protective
Speaker 4: of who of who I have around them because I
Speaker 4: know that I don't have the same kind of you know,
Speaker 4: value system on life. If someone wants to hurt my kid,
Speaker 4: where are you.
Speaker 3: At with to be.
Speaker 2: With what? There's a lot there, like with regard to
Speaker 2: personal or outsourcing of justice. Sure, I understand both. Obviously.
Speaker 2: I think the philosophical root behind seeking out a third
Speaker 2: party is to attempt to take the emotionality out of it.
Speaker 2: Most people aren't able to do it themselves. So you
Speaker 2: want to have the most neutral arbiter that you can
Speaker 2: Jewish you know, probably in ninety five percent of cases
Speaker 2: that's necessary. You know, Japanese culture, they're pretty disciplined, they're
Speaker 2: not very emotionally, but they also have like set their
Speaker 2: standards as them max. If you cause shame to your family,
Speaker 2: you stabbed yourself and the torso fatally like, that's aggressive.
Speaker 2: You know, most other cultures don't do that. So the
Speaker 2: fact that they want to say, yeah, well you know
Speaker 2: we'll take it, We'll put take it into our own
Speaker 2: hands and make sure that we do the max. You know,
Speaker 2: there's there's not a lot of restraint there, so emotional
Speaker 2: or not, you're still going to get the same maxed
Speaker 2: out result.
Speaker 3: Mm hmm.
Speaker 2: It's like, I mean, as far as like the Dirk
Speaker 2: thing goes, I don't like so we said before. I mean,
Speaker 2: it depends on what your bigger picture your values are
Speaker 2: in that case.
Speaker 3: M hmm.
Speaker 4: But I'm confused. I thought that it was to a
Speaker 4: bench his friend, it was okay, and then they found
Speaker 4: out that it was related to another woman as well.
Speaker 2: Or is that the thing to do with the woman,
Speaker 2: and he eventually thinks.
Speaker 1: That the initial conflict is over. They say, I'm not
Speaker 1: sure if it's true, but they say, initially it was
Speaker 1: over at the two crews, the two guys, you know,
Speaker 1: the two separate crews were interacting with the same women,
Speaker 1: and somewhere along the line, you know it, who knows.
Speaker 3: You know, maybe somebody's talking shit. I quite don't know.
Speaker 2: But women are extremely responsible with their actions. It's the
Speaker 2: moral of the story as the moral.
Speaker 3: Is that the moral of the story.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's the moral of pretty much any story, at
Speaker 2: least any story that involves women.
Speaker 3: Us. I don't know.
Speaker 2: Parallel universes, one with consequences, the other not so much.
Speaker 3: Women definitely living at the other one not so much. Yeah, huh.
Speaker 3: You don't think women live in the consequence universe with
Speaker 3: no consequence. They don't want to.
Speaker 1: Have any like like consequence for accountability for things of
Speaker 1: consequence when they do something wrong, You don't think. You
Speaker 1: don't think that's what chivalry rides on, the concept of
Speaker 1: women really having no consequence. No, I why else should
Speaker 1: somebody open the door for you? What's what's a logical
Speaker 1: reason for someone to open the door for a woman?
Speaker 1: Logical do her arms not work? Is the door heavy
Speaker 1: and she cannot lift it? Or is it too much
Speaker 1: work on her to swing the heavy door open? If
Speaker 1: it's cold outside, aren't we both cold?
Speaker 2: Maybe that's what it is. They live in the universal consequences.
Speaker 2: They have to trust that someone's gonna close the door. Seats,
Speaker 2: we'll just fuck it open it yourself.
Speaker 3: Too. What's the logical thing? Why should men pursue women?
Speaker 4: Well, okay, so then we also go into what is
Speaker 4: your spiritual back then background, like what are your spiritual beliefs?
Speaker 4: Because and you know, if you if you're a person
Speaker 4: who follows who's religious, then it's always been men as
Speaker 4: the head. And then women are you know, they're they're
Speaker 4: they're they're made, they're their helpmate. It's been told since
Speaker 4: how men was developed, So why would we reverse it
Speaker 4: to where and that's where society's gone now. It's like
Speaker 4: now women are taking care of men, and men are
Speaker 4: being pursued by women, and men are looking to be
Speaker 4: you know, chosen by women, and so now we're having
Speaker 4: where you know, you don't really see the value women
Speaker 4: are now, they don't see the value in men because
Speaker 4: they can do just as much as men, and they
Speaker 4: bring just as much as a man. So you don't
Speaker 4: see where he's vital until you need the trash ticking out,
Speaker 4: until you need, you know, something built, and you know,
Speaker 4: maybe a spider killed. For those that don't like spiders, you.
Speaker 3: Know, should you just learn how to kill spot?
Speaker 4: You should? I mean most women can, but you know,
Speaker 4: it's it's everything that how society. It's a shame that
Speaker 4: women don't, but.
Speaker 2: We have.
Speaker 4: There's roles that you grow up with and then some
Speaker 4: are not able to experience the roles of a mother
Speaker 4: and father and so you know, you develop, uh, you know,
Speaker 4: a point where you start to rely on self and
Speaker 4: you don't see where men because you've seen it over
Speaker 4: and over where women are able to sustain their self
Speaker 4: and there's not a vital need for them. But society
Speaker 4: in the world is made up where men are vital,
Speaker 4: they're important, they're necessary.
Speaker 3: In real life.
Speaker 4: They aren't in real life they are.
Speaker 3: Well, you pretty much can do everything a man can do.
Speaker 4: I mean that's a I mean, it's a defense thing.
Speaker 4: I mean, if that's your only option, if there's no
Speaker 4: one else that.
Speaker 3: You just logical capability.
Speaker 4: I mean, I believe that most women may want a partner.
Speaker 4: It's just hard to find someone, so you have to
Speaker 4: learn to rely on yourself.
Speaker 1: What do you feel like, I mean, logically, I can't
Speaker 1: think of anything a woman can't do that a man
Speaker 1: could do. I think it goes into do they want.
Speaker 3: To do it?
Speaker 4: It's really do you need to Most men need to
Speaker 4: step into the role that they were given and be
Speaker 4: the men that they're supposed to be.
Speaker 2: But that goes that's predicated on the assumption that they
Speaker 2: want a woman and that a woman brings anything to
Speaker 2: the table themselves other than sex. It's a two way
Speaker 2: street in that regard.
Speaker 1: Yeah, and that's really what so a man. So even
Speaker 1: one hundred years ago, right, a man would choose a
Speaker 1: woman because a woman was the only way he could
Speaker 1: continue on his lineage. Man could cook, man could clean,
Speaker 1: man could decorate a house, man could do everything that
Speaker 1: a woman could do, just like a woman could change oil,
Speaker 1: change a tire, go to work, pay bills, right, but
Speaker 1: then right morally right, which goes into that Christianity background,
Speaker 1: or Islamic background, or Judaism background, or even in the
Speaker 1: you know laws, because there are like I always say
Speaker 1: there's three things that I know for sure create morality.
Speaker 3: The legal system, the legend, and streets. Streets Like culture
Speaker 3: creates laws, it creates morality.
Speaker 1: And it really comes down to you don't need a
Speaker 1: woman to cook for you.
Speaker 3: You want a woman to cook for you. You don't
Speaker 3: need a woman to clean up for you. You want
Speaker 3: a woman to clean up for you. You know what
Speaker 3: you need a woman to do.
Speaker 1: To carry your lineage, to produce a child for you.
Speaker 1: That's where the value of women change through logics, because
Speaker 1: everybody could.
Speaker 3: Do the same thing. So for remember, a woman, like
Speaker 3: a man's sperm, is the seed a woman just she
Speaker 3: has the egg to just fertilize it. But a man's
Speaker 3: seed goes into the dirt. And that's why they always
Speaker 3: used to say, a woman is giving you a child,
Speaker 3: she's you know, she's her eggs are you know, that's
Speaker 3: where your seeds are developing inside this egg. So I
Speaker 3: think logically, when you look at it that way, this.
Speaker 1: Is minus you know, moral compass or you know, societal
Speaker 1: norms or even religious structure.
Speaker 3: You know what I'm saying.
Speaker 1: It all comes down to chivalry and everything that makes
Speaker 1: a woman value is because she can give you the
Speaker 1: ability to let your seed grow, to fertilize your seed.
Speaker 1: That's the true logical difference. There's nothing else logically different.
Speaker 2: Nothing.
Speaker 3: Women could always do the same thing. They can go
Speaker 3: to work twelve hours, they can pay their own bills,
Speaker 3: they can change the oil, they can get triple a
Speaker 3: change a tire.
Speaker 1: They all of the things men can do for them,
Speaker 1: they can do for theirself. The only thing a woman
Speaker 1: can't do is impregnate herself. You don't need a man,
Speaker 1: you don't need to spine for that eventually, And that's
Speaker 1: the logics, right. The logics was the seed is the baby,
Speaker 1: the egg is the carrier, the carrier of a baby.
Speaker 1: So that used to create the value or women to men.
Speaker 1: This is why men would marry women fourteen years old
Speaker 1: right when they started, you know, administration, because they wanted
Speaker 1: wealth was con her how big your family was. So
Speaker 1: if you got a girl that was thirteen years old
Speaker 1: and you were twenty two, you could just keep it
Speaker 1: pregnating her for the next I don't know, twenty years
Speaker 1: or some shit.
Speaker 2: You know how.
Speaker 3: Many You know, you have twenty kids.
Speaker 1: You can get pregnant every day till she's forty four,
Speaker 1: she keep getting pregnant every you know what I mean,
Speaker 1: and people thought that was wealth. So that created the
Speaker 1: value for women before that.
Speaker 3: You know.
Speaker 1: Now religiously God saying a woman is your helpmate, So
Speaker 1: a man needing a help her to to uh, you know,
Speaker 1: to accomplish his goals. But if you really think about
Speaker 1: it logically, that's the logical stands. So that's what I'm
Speaker 1: saying to you. Even when you think about it as
Speaker 1: far as as far as there is no logical reason
Speaker 1: to be shiverrous, it's because this woman can allow your
Speaker 1: lineage to carry on. That's what gave her the pedestal.
Speaker 1: She can house your not only can you trip off
Speaker 1: this right, so you could take five seconds, I mean you,
Speaker 1: I'm sure in your life you know you're wrong. You've
Speaker 1: probably been with a man that has took five seconds
Speaker 1: that she could leave you ten months worth of work
Speaker 1: and there's nothing this man. He don't even have to
Speaker 1: be there for that ten months worth of work. All
Speaker 1: that stuff happened to you. Your organs squished around. And
Speaker 1: I don't want to sound like extra you know, on
Speaker 1: the side of.
Speaker 3: Ladies, but this is just for real, right, it's like
Speaker 3: you could just take that five seconds.
Speaker 1: You can meet him in the club. He could take
Speaker 1: that five seconds, and you don't even enjoy what happened.
Speaker 1: At ten months, your body is finna go through helen
Speaker 1: hot water. And then when the child is born, you
Speaker 1: have to feed the child like you're equipped with the
Speaker 1: ability to feed the child for at least a year
Speaker 1: or two.
Speaker 4: Yes, that is.
Speaker 1: Where the value and women were placed in that respected
Speaker 1: and admirable, admired role.
Speaker 3: But if I'm asking.
Speaker 1: My homeboy on the stream, he's saying, if the connotations
Speaker 1: I don't love my baby mother is because you don't value.
Speaker 3: What she did for you. You don't vow. You can't
Speaker 3: say you value your kid without value on your baby mother,
Speaker 3: the mother your child. You don't have a kid without it.
Speaker 3: And don't forgive me to all the people who listen
Speaker 3: to no seilings. Look, fellers, I'm all for the fifty
Speaker 3: fifty concept as far as it's both your child, But
Speaker 3: let's be honest, it's just so much you gotta do
Speaker 3: in the first three years.
Speaker 1: You don't need to be there. She really needs you
Speaker 1: for the first you know, fifteen seconds of it. Pretty
Speaker 1: much you could just disappear and she could do it
Speaker 1: all by herself.
Speaker 3: You know what I mean.
Speaker 1: For the next I don't know, two three years. When
Speaker 1: is the first time a baby needs more than a
Speaker 1: mom's breast milk? When is for sure?
Speaker 3: With age.
Speaker 2: Old men.
Speaker 4: Baby the first year for sure, at.
Speaker 1: Least he could get through twelve months. Just a child
Speaker 1: can get through twelve months with just a mother's breast milk.
Speaker 3: Yeah, that is crazy. So ten months plus a year,
Speaker 3: so that's twenty two months for sure. You don't have
Speaker 3: to be there.
Speaker 1: So that's where I think chivalry really is rational. But
Speaker 1: you would have to respect what a woman can do
Speaker 1: for your legacy. And I don't think most men.
Speaker 4: Because there's not a value system for both. Like men
Speaker 4: don't value women, women don't value men. We don't look
Speaker 4: at what they you know, we pace monetary value on
Speaker 4: each sex, so on a man, so you don't see
Speaker 4: where you don't see on men. So some some do.
Speaker 4: And but I think it's also the fault of men too,
Speaker 4: Like some men have reduced theirself to only be necessary
Speaker 4: because of what they bring to women. You know, a
Speaker 4: woman can only know what you have if you you know,
Speaker 4: make evidence or break light or what you you know
Speaker 4: what you bring. If you don't bring just yourself and
Speaker 4: she only sees like you know, your car and you
Speaker 4: lead with those things, and you're gonna get the ones
Speaker 4: who only want you for stuff, you know. So the
Speaker 4: fact that men are not building themselves up to bring
Speaker 4: more than just money, Yeah, that's what you're going to
Speaker 4: fall into. Like group gold diggers don't just they exist
Speaker 4: because there's someone that knows that they can't receipt or
Speaker 4: get the type of women that they have without things.
Speaker 4: Men acquire things, and that's been that's even in the
Speaker 4: animal kingdom. I mean, you want to be seen for
Speaker 4: what you have, so you can't judge that you're meeting
Speaker 4: only the type of women who want you for stuff
Speaker 4: because you led with that, I'm just your personality. Did
Speaker 4: she get to see that hey, you know, did you
Speaker 4: meet her in a Toyota Corolla and then she got
Speaker 4: to know you and love you and then you shoulder
Speaker 4: your garage with the Porsche or did you lead with
Speaker 4: the Porsche.
Speaker 2: It's like we're on the other end of the critical
Speaker 2: mass moment there for that. It's like talking about valuing,
Speaker 2: you know, bilateral value between men and women. In the
Speaker 2: last sixty years. As you know, the crescendo of women
Speaker 2: into the corporate income space has tracked perpendicularly with the
Speaker 2: facilitation of casual pussy. So both those things have I mean,
Speaker 2: women have needed men in their life less financially because
Speaker 2: they have their own money, and men have needed women
Speaker 2: in their life less permanently because they made pussy very
Speaker 2: easily available. And then you factor that in with like
Speaker 2: say the materialistic sugar daddy type of situation. Yeah, I
Speaker 2: mean a generation ago, sure that was maybe like the
Speaker 2: minority of outcomes. Now it's such the majority of outcome
Speaker 2: is It's hit that critical mass moment where now like
Speaker 2: women define the quality of their date based off of
Speaker 2: what the date spent on them, and that's become like
Speaker 2: a large scale majority expectation assessment. It's not. And you
Speaker 2: see that kind of thing happens all the time. Like
Speaker 2: you know, what you can take like any I'm trying
Speaker 2: to pick on like I know, like the listenership of
Speaker 2: like the show or whatever. But if you took a
Speaker 2: population sector and like it's just just every stating this
Speaker 2: is a mathematical illustration example, like and one in ten
Speaker 2: kids there come from like single mom households so the
Speaker 2: ten percent are still going to be assimilated into the
Speaker 2: value system of the ninety percent until the ten percent
Speaker 2: becomes the ninety percent. Then the uh then the former
Speaker 2: ninety percent, now ten is going to be assimilated into
Speaker 2: the vice system of the majority. So you see that
Speaker 2: happening in this case, you know, study as well, like
Speaker 2: in real time.
Speaker 3: Yeah.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I just think both sex have a bad habit
Speaker 1: of doing that. And I don't want to make it
Speaker 1: about like some kind of equal level, but I think
Speaker 1: this is a this is an issue in humans. I mean,
Speaker 1: because you're right, there are men who lead with their money.
Speaker 1: And I've been in a situation or not a situation,
Speaker 1: but my thought had been, you got to accept that
Speaker 1: women see you as providers.
Speaker 2: And human beings. Men and women want to get the
Speaker 2: most for the least.
Speaker 3: Yeah, that's just it exists every time.
Speaker 2: If getting gobs of money is easier for you for
Speaker 2: your time investment than being there like super invested in
Speaker 2: a person interpersonally, and you can say you still haven't.
Speaker 2: I got a surplus a fifty grand based off of
Speaker 2: the fact that I make seven hundred K a year.
Speaker 2: Gives a shit, it's nothing. Here's fifty grand, you know,
Speaker 2: versus you know, I don't. I barely make fifty grand,
Speaker 2: but I have all the desire to sink all of
Speaker 2: my effort into, you know, the interpersonal communication with the women.
Speaker 1: I mean, yes, yeah, I definitely agree with that, And
Speaker 1: I get with Tony is saying as far as like
Speaker 1: men who lead with their money, because women do want providers,
Speaker 1: they do want somebody to take care of them. But
Speaker 1: it's the equivalent of a woman leading with her body
Speaker 1: and wearing certain outfits. Sure right, that the goal could
Speaker 1: be like, you know, a man sees a woman and
Speaker 1: he's like, hey, I want to continue on my lineage
Speaker 1: on the planet Earth. I want to make you know,
Speaker 1: I want to spread my seed and so forth and song.
Speaker 1: And it's like, you're over selling your ability to create
Speaker 1: and nurture like me, and over selling their ability to
Speaker 1: to provide and protect.
Speaker 2: Are you saying all those social media tworking videos are
Speaker 2: not setting a marital expectation. I'm not hearing that.
Speaker 3: Definitely, that definitely definitely not shattering.
Speaker 2: Okay.
Speaker 4: I think the fact that we're I mean, society still
Speaker 4: acts as if this is not a normal occurrence is unreal.
Speaker 4: It's like everyone since the beginning of time, there have
Speaker 4: been women who have tried to access men or the
Speaker 4: money that they've had, whatever they brought. It's not anything new,
Speaker 4: it's just that the upsetting part is that there are
Speaker 4: not people. Some people are not in the right tax bracket,
Speaker 4: are the right income to the issue. Bothers people that
Speaker 4: don't have the monetary access to get the woman that
Speaker 4: is considered the go digger. Like some men are making
Speaker 4: this like a common thing that they run into, but
Speaker 4: you're not of that. You're not in the running because
Speaker 4: most of the women who are after certain men, they're
Speaker 4: after men that have set out to meet women or
Speaker 4: what they can give them. Like the sugar daddy exists.
Speaker 4: That's what he knows his role is. He knows that
Speaker 4: he's only looking for someone that he can maybe take
Speaker 4: out spend money on. And then it's social media has
Speaker 4: made it like everyone has access to that woman, and
Speaker 4: that's not true and it's very unfortunate. Like you know,
Speaker 4: most men are saying it's hard to meet, you know,
Speaker 4: good women because you know they're all after your money.
Speaker 4: But most people are not even trying to pursue relationships
Speaker 4: or even get to know someone to find out if
Speaker 4: you want to be if she wants to see you
Speaker 4: more than just your money. So it's it's like we're
Speaker 4: not really just trying to get to know people. And
Speaker 4: that's why you have so many people with children with
Speaker 4: people that don't know, they don't like. They've never they've
Speaker 4: never wanted anything more with this person other than just sex,
Speaker 4: and bam, a kid came. So when a man says, like, no,
Speaker 4: I don't love her, he's right. He doesn't know who
Speaker 4: the hell she is. She just happens to be the
Speaker 4: mother of his child. You didn't set out with a
Speaker 4: mission and a purpose. People are giving their bodies to
Speaker 4: people that they don't like. They're right, you don't like.
Speaker 4: And that's one of the worst things you can ever
Speaker 4: do to yourself is sign yourself up with someone you
Speaker 4: don't like because you don't know, You don't even you
Speaker 4: haven't even taken the time to say, hey, you know,
Speaker 4: what is their stance on anything, whether be able to
Speaker 4: educate your kid, raise your kid, provide for your kid.
Speaker 4: This chick doesn't know because she met him in the club,
Speaker 4: or it's vice versa, Like what about her? Would say,
Speaker 4: you're stuck with her now? But can you say like
Speaker 4: with confidence, like, man, I'm happy about the fact that
Speaker 4: she's my kid's mom. No you're not. And now it's
Speaker 4: like everyone's serving time. And that's why you see people
Speaker 4: doing child support and they're like, shit, I can't wait
Speaker 4: till eighteen and yeah, because you didn't see you have
Speaker 4: you know, the woman didn't provide you with a gift,
Speaker 4: or you're like you know your lineage, You're like, oh, yeah,
Speaker 4: she just gave you a a fucking bill. That excuse me.
Speaker 4: That's what you see it as you know, so you're
Speaker 4: not going to take like now. You know, at first,
Speaker 4: there was like we were raised like a man would say, hey,
Speaker 4: I come to my parents' dad. You know, I to
Speaker 4: step up. You know, I have a kid. Now you
Speaker 4: don't have to raise anything. You can pick and choose
Speaker 4: if you want to do this. That's why that stance
Speaker 4: on pro choice is such a big deal, because people
Speaker 4: get to do these things and then say not today,
Speaker 4: I don't want it, you know. And that's why, like society,
Speaker 4: we're able to discard everything. We're able to look at
Speaker 4: things and just be like, oh I don't want that,
Speaker 4: or or don't want her, or or don't want him
Speaker 4: or you know, and that's just what's tragic is that
Speaker 4: there is no there's no commitment to anything you know,
Speaker 4: so and that that leaves you in a bad place
Speaker 4: now because if you have, you know, traditional values, you're
Speaker 4: just seem like an eyeball because everyone else is just like, well,
Speaker 4: you know, I don't have to I don't have to
Speaker 4: do that. Where we're just at this, we don't have
Speaker 4: to do anything we don't want to do. And that
Speaker 4: carries over even into like the rest.
Speaker 2: Of our life.
Speaker 4: We don't have to build with anybody. You know, I
Speaker 4: get to spend time with you, and if I say
Speaker 4: I don't like you, then regardless of what we shared
Speaker 4: or what we've done, I'm over it. And that's the
Speaker 4: horrible part about society.
Speaker 1: Now.
Speaker 3: Yes, it's tough.
Speaker 1: I think I've made my own personal mistakes when it
Speaker 1: comes down to when it comes down to a lot
Speaker 1: of this stuff, because I do think that my values
Speaker 1: are like a seventy song, but I'm still trying to
Speaker 1: fit into twenty twenty four R and B.
Speaker 3: And I think there is no room to do that.
Speaker 1: Like it's crazy because as somebody that grew up in
Speaker 1: the streets, right like I don't act like I am
Speaker 1: a law body citizen.
Speaker 3: I do not believe you can play in the middle
Speaker 3: of Like.
Speaker 1: I feel so bad for black people who really feel
Speaker 1: like like I talk to my homeboys and they'll be like, oh, yeah,
Speaker 1: well into that street bullshit, But then they won't call
Speaker 1: the police when something happens to their family, Like.
Speaker 3: That's no man's land.
Speaker 1: And I never recommend, like I tell problem, like, you
Speaker 1: should never be in no man's land where you don't
Speaker 1: want to react like the streets, but then you don't
Speaker 1: want to be like a tax band citizen and use
Speaker 1: the proper authorities for these matters, you know what I mean.
Speaker 1: So that's how I feel morally that I get stuck
Speaker 1: at where it's like I have the morals from sixties
Speaker 1: and seventies, but I'm trying to adapt into a two
Speaker 1: thousand and twenty four space of existing. Yeah, and it's
Speaker 1: really like the same thing. It's really no man's land there.
Speaker 2: Sure, older you get, and the older you get, the
Speaker 2: harder it gets like that kind of stuff problem like
Speaker 2: that exists more in the early twenties at the college,
Speaker 2: you know, experienced all that kind of stuff to the
Speaker 2: degree that it's reduced, you know, obviously over the life
Speaker 2: two generations for sure, but it does exist more there
Speaker 2: than in your mid thirties, when you're now more emotionally independent.
Speaker 2: Other people have kids. You might you might not, but
Speaker 2: like the the hurdle of shit to get over, you know,
Speaker 2: when you're into your thirties and forties is a whole lot.
Speaker 2: I mean, you you you don't know who you are.
Speaker 2: You follow some of your twenty two you learn who
Speaker 2: you are with that other person. When you learn who
Speaker 2: you are on your own, you know that that that
Speaker 2: by itself makes it a whole lot less necessary to
Speaker 2: have a partner. You don't need all of the soft values, you.
Speaker 3: Know, quote unquote m hm, So is anything worth all
Speaker 3: of this stuff? Like how do you exist in this space?
Speaker 3: Where like so even in Dirk situation, now like how
Speaker 3: does he There were people channing saying, oh, you need
Speaker 3: to ride for King bonb Yeah right, and then now
Speaker 3: he actually you realize possibly.
Speaker 1: You know, obviously we don't know if this evidence is true.
Speaker 1: You know, it is the government of America. They usually
Speaker 1: they have a bad habit of misframing black man a
Speaker 1: million times. But let's say, for example, this is true,
Speaker 1: how do we judge him and not support him in
Speaker 1: this situation for getting the vengeance you know, against somebody
Speaker 1: that harmed his friend or that was responsible for the
Speaker 1: harming of his friend. Like, that's my thing. So I
Speaker 1: won't say it's tragic or sad. I'll just be like, yeah, well,
Speaker 1: you know, that's the life we live. Fight it, hopefully
Speaker 1: you beat it, yeah, you know versus where you know,
Speaker 1: like I said, I'm telling my homeboy based off of Alive,
Speaker 1: It's like he like, well, you mad at some dude
Speaker 1: that slept with this lady. And that goes back to
Speaker 1: that point you were saying, I don't want to lose
Speaker 1: That is, you don't have to know her. Once you
Speaker 1: come together with somebody, intimately, the feelings are there in
Speaker 1: that exchange, right, It's not just bread and liking someone
Speaker 1: or preferring their method of behavior. That's not really love.
Speaker 1: That's like you know what I mean, that's that could
Speaker 1: be respect, it could be admirable, but that ain't love.
Speaker 1: Love is something that is really this innate desire to care,
Speaker 1: and it's more innate.
Speaker 3: You don't like, you don't develop it. It's natural, you know.
Speaker 1: It's not something you can force, like you can show love,
Speaker 1: but you don't have to be loved, you know what
Speaker 1: I'm saying. So that's a little funny, but I gotta
Speaker 1: revisit it. But I'm saying it's like if you do
Speaker 1: come into a woman, I mean, and I don't mean
Speaker 1: coming to it like the nasty way, but like in
Speaker 1: the biblical sense, there is a connection of emotions that happen.
Speaker 1: You do see your child, and there are emotions that
Speaker 1: you didn't have to develop because you are appreciate her personality.
Speaker 1: It just comes with the territory. And that's what I
Speaker 1: was saying to him about the relationship with women in war.
Speaker 3: You know what I'm saying. It's like.
Speaker 1: That's where they were mad at as far as and
Speaker 1: he really didn't feel like no, he was like, yeah, well,
Speaker 1: if somebody sleep with us, she just a whole because
Speaker 1: he felt.
Speaker 3: Like there is nothing there.
Speaker 1: Like even even when he was referencing the girls he
Speaker 1: was dating, he was like, yeah, well I'm not sleeping
Speaker 1: with them.
Speaker 3: I don't have nothing to do with love. That's about you,
Speaker 3: you know what I mean. That's about you. I mean,
Speaker 3: you're not making no kids.
Speaker 1: So I'm like, what you're talking about is when that
Speaker 1: girl needs some help you know later on, like you
Speaker 1: buy a car when your kid is grown and she
Speaker 1: don't need a ride no more.
Speaker 3: That's love. You get nothing for it. That's because your
Speaker 3: appreciative is to love.
Speaker 1: Is you care about her, because why you care about
Speaker 1: her is more than just she delivered your kid or
Speaker 1: she raised your kid. Is because there is a connection
Speaker 1: that happened that we are not grivn credence to, as
Speaker 1: you know, as a society, especially in America, now, we're
Speaker 1: not giving credence to the true connections of those intimate
Speaker 1: you know, those intimate moments where we come together and.
Speaker 3: These feelings are created.
Speaker 1: Like I as somebody asked me that, and I remember
Speaker 1: they was like, like I realized, if I could have
Speaker 1: met a woman tonight and we could have had sex,
Speaker 1: and the next morning she walks out of the streets
Speaker 1: and get hit by a car, it would affect me
Speaker 1: completely different than if I didn't know who that person was.
Speaker 1: It could have been I could have met her at
Speaker 1: the hotel lobby for thirty minutes, and you know what
Speaker 1: I mean. She could have came to my room and
Speaker 1: we had an intimate night together, and she could walk
Speaker 1: outside and get killed.
Speaker 3: That will be stuck on your mind because.
Speaker 2: In a positive way or a negative way.
Speaker 1: In a negative way, okay, yeah you will, Peters Christy,
Speaker 1: I just caught that you will feel something because that
Speaker 1: physical intimate connection creates a different type of bond, and
Speaker 1: people are not recognizing that connection when it comes to
Speaker 1: war women.
Speaker 3: They just not they are. We couldn't get them to
Speaker 3: admit that they like.
Speaker 1: What's wrong with saying you love the person who delivered
Speaker 1: your lineage onto the planet.
Speaker 3: I don't care if y'all just met one day at
Speaker 3: a club and you got this lady pregnant. How could
Speaker 3: you not fix your mouth to say you love the
Speaker 3: person who carried and delivered your lineage your future lineage
Speaker 3: on a planet Earth? People? Is crazy?
Speaker 4: Yeah, But then it goes again into what's a person's
Speaker 4: moral code? What's their value system? You know you have
Speaker 4: to look at you know, if a person for a
Speaker 4: person to take the life of someone and you dress
Speaker 4: it up as it was required because of your street
Speaker 4: code or something they said or something they did, then
Speaker 4: that goes into again, what is your value system on
Speaker 4: the life of others? Do you believe that it's your
Speaker 4: appointed job? To go into a neighborhood and take the
Speaker 4: life of others who are from an alternate street. Do
Speaker 4: you are you okay with that? Some people are okay
Speaker 4: with that, And so some people don't see you know,
Speaker 4: women as you know, where there is my mother. I
Speaker 4: respect this woman because I have a mother. I respect
Speaker 4: this woman because I have a sister or all holes
Speaker 4: or holes and that some people have that that belief,
Speaker 4: so they won't see women. And I love my mom.
Speaker 4: But then you got the hoes out here, you know.
Speaker 4: Then there's some people who just because I respect my mother,
Speaker 4: I respect other women because I respect my father. I
Speaker 4: respect men. And that's where we have That's where we
Speaker 4: have the issue because people don't it's their value system.
Speaker 4: I said. It just throws me how there is there
Speaker 4: are women who can have children with a man and
Speaker 4: say she hates the man. But has you know, given
Speaker 4: birth to his child, seize his child every day, knows
Speaker 4: that his DNA resides throughout this child, and you still
Speaker 4: say you hate him. So mentally, what's going on? Because
Speaker 4: that should really bother you that you can say and
Speaker 4: not look at you hate a part of your child.
Speaker 4: You separated the man. But that's a part of your child.
Speaker 4: That man is a part of your child. So if
Speaker 4: you but because people won't also be accountable for the
Speaker 4: fact that they've been with people that they don't know
Speaker 4: and they don't like. We approached we talked about it
Speaker 4: like men, and people showed traits about themselves that we
Speaker 4: say that, oh, you know, we brush them off, but
Speaker 4: until we're stuck with them. Now it's an issue. And
Speaker 4: that's why you can't really get someone to support women
Speaker 4: when they say, oh, you know, all men are not
Speaker 4: all men are horrible. You're horrible because your choice and
Speaker 4: who you choose to be with and who you like.
Speaker 4: That's your personal issue. You need to work on that,
Speaker 4: not all men as a whole. We don't know all
Speaker 4: the men, so why would you say all men are horrible?
Speaker 1: And looking out for tuning into the No Salers podcast,
Speaker 1: Please do us a favorite, subscribe, great commentist Share. This
Speaker 1: episode was recorded right here on the West coast of
Speaker 1: the USA. We produced about the Black Effect podcast network
Speaker 1: and not Hard Radio.
Speaker 3: Yeah