WEBVTT - Five Things About the 2021 PGA Championship with Kyle Porter

0:00:00.360 --> 0:00:04.160
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back to another edition of the Frida Egg Podcast.

0:00:04.480 --> 0:00:07.960
<v Speaker 1>Today's episode is brought to you by our friends over

0:00:08.039 --> 0:00:13.760
<v Speaker 1>at Smathers and Branson. Guys are probably familiar with Smathers

0:00:13.800 --> 0:00:16.680
<v Speaker 1>and Branson if you've, you know, at your local favorite

0:00:16.720 --> 0:00:23.400
<v Speaker 1>pro shop. They make incredible handmade needle point products. This

0:00:23.440 --> 0:00:29.800
<v Speaker 1>stuff is, you know, one handstitch. They make belts, hats, wallats,

0:00:30.120 --> 0:00:34.120
<v Speaker 1>really all kinds of different stuff, Christmas stockings, you know, loafers,

0:00:34.880 --> 0:00:37.839
<v Speaker 1>and you've probably seen them in their pro shop. But

0:00:37.880 --> 0:00:41.879
<v Speaker 1>one thing I wasn't really aware of was their extensive

0:00:42.080 --> 0:00:45.159
<v Speaker 1>website offering. So you can get these online too, and

0:00:45.200 --> 0:00:48.320
<v Speaker 1>they've got a ton of their unique designs. They've got

0:00:48.360 --> 0:00:53.080
<v Speaker 1>college stuff, university stuff. This is the best belts in

0:00:53.120 --> 0:00:56.880
<v Speaker 1>the business. The hats are really cool, really unique gifts.

0:00:56.960 --> 0:01:00.480
<v Speaker 1>If you want to give somebody with Father's Day coming up,

0:01:00.600 --> 0:01:04.160
<v Speaker 1>a nice thoughtful gift. So if you want to use

0:01:04.240 --> 0:01:09.080
<v Speaker 1>the promo code Fridagg, you will get fifteen percent off

0:01:09.160 --> 0:01:12.839
<v Speaker 1>your entire order plus free shipping. That's the promo code

0:01:12.880 --> 0:01:15.080
<v Speaker 1>is Fridagg and you need to go to Smathers and

0:01:15.200 --> 0:01:19.000
<v Speaker 1>Branson dot com. That's s M A T h E

0:01:19.160 --> 0:01:23.280
<v Speaker 1>R S and Branson, b R A N s O

0:01:23.480 --> 0:01:27.600
<v Speaker 1>N dot com promo code Frida Egg. It's great to

0:01:27.680 --> 0:01:30.880
<v Speaker 1>have them on board as a partner of the Frida Egg.

0:01:32.760 --> 0:01:36.800
<v Speaker 1>Today's episode is with the Great Kyle Porter. Kyle is

0:01:37.720 --> 0:01:41.640
<v Speaker 1>golf writer se probably an editor, a big time title

0:01:41.680 --> 0:01:44.720
<v Speaker 1>at CBS Sports. You can find all of his writing there.

0:01:45.040 --> 0:01:47.279
<v Speaker 1>He's also one of the co hosts of the First

0:01:47.319 --> 0:01:52.000
<v Speaker 1>Cut podcast. Kyle came on to preview the PGA at

0:01:52.160 --> 0:01:55.640
<v Speaker 1>Key Island this week, so we did our five things.

0:01:56.120 --> 0:01:58.360
<v Speaker 1>We each came up with five different things that we're

0:01:58.400 --> 0:02:00.520
<v Speaker 1>watching this week. We had a little bit of a overlap,

0:02:00.880 --> 0:02:03.800
<v Speaker 1>but as always Kyle had a lot of great thoughts

0:02:03.840 --> 0:02:07.160
<v Speaker 1>about the tournament and uh, you know what he's watching

0:02:07.160 --> 0:02:10.639
<v Speaker 1>this week. So, without further ado, here is Kyle Porter.

0:02:11.120 --> 0:02:13.919
<v Speaker 2>I miss the green, for example, I'm already upset. When

0:02:13.919 --> 0:02:16.040
<v Speaker 2>I find my ball in the bunker, I'm really upset.

0:02:16.120 --> 0:02:17.520
<v Speaker 2>And when I find my ball in a.

0:02:17.480 --> 0:02:20.600
<v Speaker 1>Bright egg Friday Egg, the dreaded Frida Egg, Frida Egg,

0:02:20.680 --> 0:02:23.200
<v Speaker 1>Frida Egg, Brian Egg, Frida Egg brid Egg, Lie, I'm

0:02:23.200 --> 0:02:25.200
<v Speaker 1>about ready to run off of the hum course.

0:02:47.840 --> 0:02:52.560
<v Speaker 2>Kyle, how's it going, I'm good, I'm uh, you know,

0:02:52.600 --> 0:02:55.680
<v Speaker 2>we were just talking about this. Covering a major from

0:02:55.760 --> 0:02:59.280
<v Speaker 2>home is very different than being there. You and I switched,

0:02:59.400 --> 0:03:02.440
<v Speaker 2>so you were at home during the Masters. I was

0:03:02.480 --> 0:03:04.680
<v Speaker 2>at the Masters. Now you're at the PGA and I'm

0:03:04.720 --> 0:03:07.720
<v Speaker 2>home for the PGA, And there are pros and cons

0:03:07.720 --> 0:03:10.359
<v Speaker 2>to both. But I'm excited. I don't know, man, I

0:03:10.600 --> 0:03:14.040
<v Speaker 2>get I get really fired up from for major weeks.

0:03:14.040 --> 0:03:17.079
<v Speaker 2>It's just a ton of fun. You just you kind

0:03:17.080 --> 0:03:19.880
<v Speaker 2>of bathe in it for you know, eight straight days

0:03:19.960 --> 0:03:22.880
<v Speaker 2>or whatever, and it's tiring by the end, but it's

0:03:23.000 --> 0:03:23.880
<v Speaker 2>it's so much fun.

0:03:24.760 --> 0:03:29.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Yeah, it's majors are it makes a job so

0:03:29.200 --> 0:03:32.079
<v Speaker 1>much fun. It's uh, it's like so much work in

0:03:32.160 --> 0:03:34.320
<v Speaker 1>the lead up and then so much work during the week,

0:03:34.360 --> 0:03:37.120
<v Speaker 1>and then there's the you know, kind of deconstruction of

0:03:37.160 --> 0:03:39.480
<v Speaker 1>the major at the end when you're you know, kind

0:03:39.480 --> 0:03:43.800
<v Speaker 1>of the fallout from everything that happens. But I mean,

0:03:43.880 --> 0:03:46.800
<v Speaker 1>this is uh, this is legacies and everything. I mean

0:03:46.840 --> 0:03:49.480
<v Speaker 1>not to be cliche, but this is this is what

0:03:49.520 --> 0:03:51.040
<v Speaker 1>it all comes down to, right.

0:03:51.480 --> 0:03:53.560
<v Speaker 2>How do you I was I was wondering. I always

0:03:53.560 --> 0:03:56.280
<v Speaker 2>wonder this with other people because I kind of go

0:03:56.360 --> 0:03:59.760
<v Speaker 2>back and forth, But how do you prepare for like,

0:03:59.800 --> 0:04:03.480
<v Speaker 2>I'm Major week, are you reading stuff a week in advance,

0:04:03.520 --> 0:04:07.000
<v Speaker 2>a month in advance, are you like, like, what's your

0:04:07.200 --> 0:04:09.200
<v Speaker 2>what does your preparation leading in look like?

0:04:10.000 --> 0:04:12.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean a lot of what we do is with

0:04:12.080 --> 0:04:15.440
<v Speaker 1>the golf course, so it's it's focused a ton on that.

0:04:15.880 --> 0:04:18.840
<v Speaker 1>And then I think it's just I just like watching

0:04:18.880 --> 0:04:21.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot of golf in the weeks leading up, you know,

0:04:21.839 --> 0:04:24.800
<v Speaker 1>making sure to carve out time to watch and see

0:04:25.160 --> 0:04:27.480
<v Speaker 1>what's kind of happening, and it's I think this new

0:04:27.520 --> 0:04:30.960
<v Speaker 1>schedule kind of makes it a little weird because the

0:04:31.080 --> 0:04:34.800
<v Speaker 1>guys don't play a ton between the Masters and the like.

0:04:35.000 --> 0:04:38.920
<v Speaker 1>I feel like we you could really conceivably not see

0:04:38.960 --> 0:04:41.400
<v Speaker 1>these guys outside of you know, they play Quail Hollow

0:04:41.520 --> 0:04:44.600
<v Speaker 1>or they play a valves Bar. But I think that's

0:04:44.600 --> 0:04:46.360
<v Speaker 1>one of the things with this new schedule, is it

0:04:46.640 --> 0:04:49.599
<v Speaker 1>kind of month after month after month of the Majors.

0:04:49.920 --> 0:04:53.200
<v Speaker 1>Is that you know, there's a lot of tournaments in

0:04:53.279 --> 0:04:56.520
<v Speaker 1>between that don't matter a ton, is I miss? That's

0:04:56.520 --> 0:04:58.240
<v Speaker 1>the thing I think I like the most about the

0:04:58.279 --> 0:05:01.160
<v Speaker 1>Masters lead in YEP is how those guys are playing

0:05:01.240 --> 0:05:03.560
<v Speaker 1>so much on the West Coast. Then you get the

0:05:03.600 --> 0:05:06.640
<v Speaker 1>players and you kind of have this really good building,

0:05:07.640 --> 0:05:10.919
<v Speaker 1>and I think having that PGA one month after it

0:05:11.000 --> 0:05:11.839
<v Speaker 1>loses that a little.

0:05:12.040 --> 0:05:14.920
<v Speaker 2>What do you do well? I agree with you about

0:05:14.920 --> 0:05:16.520
<v Speaker 2>the lead in. I was singing about that. I think

0:05:16.520 --> 0:05:19.960
<v Speaker 2>the Players is even better than the Masters because there's

0:05:20.080 --> 0:05:23.240
<v Speaker 2>so many tournaments that those guys play with Arnold Palmer

0:05:23.440 --> 0:05:27.160
<v Speaker 2>and I mean there's there's like that six week stretch

0:05:27.200 --> 0:05:31.039
<v Speaker 2>where you're playing like at like at least four times

0:05:31.240 --> 0:05:35.599
<v Speaker 2>and most management yeah, and most guys are playing five.

0:05:36.760 --> 0:05:38.520
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. Usually I like to read about the

0:05:38.520 --> 0:05:43.440
<v Speaker 2>course kind of the week before, and I agree with you,

0:05:43.560 --> 0:05:46.360
<v Speaker 2>like I love looking at data golf and some of

0:05:46.440 --> 0:05:49.560
<v Speaker 2>the advanced statistics. But but sometimes with and I think

0:05:49.600 --> 0:05:53.599
<v Speaker 2>that stuff matters for the Masters because of the way

0:05:53.680 --> 0:05:56.760
<v Speaker 2>the lead in is, But for the PGA, you're like, like,

0:05:56.920 --> 0:05:59.520
<v Speaker 2>just what happened at the end of February? Is it

0:05:59.600 --> 0:06:03.760
<v Speaker 2>meaning for the PGA at Kiowa? I don't know. It

0:06:04.040 --> 0:06:06.720
<v Speaker 2>doesn't seem like it, So I think it's kind of

0:06:06.800 --> 0:06:09.160
<v Speaker 2>hard to I think the PJA is a little bit

0:06:09.200 --> 0:06:12.640
<v Speaker 2>difficult from that perspective to to prognosticate, to kind of

0:06:12.640 --> 0:06:15.680
<v Speaker 2>figure out. But I just I love the course research.

0:06:15.760 --> 0:06:19.560
<v Speaker 2>I love like Sean Martin did a great piece. Y'all's

0:06:19.600 --> 0:06:23.440
<v Speaker 2>fried egg video on on Kiola was awesome because I

0:06:23.920 --> 0:06:27.559
<v Speaker 2>like learning about the history of kind of the course

0:06:27.600 --> 0:06:30.000
<v Speaker 2>and the course architecture. Jeff Shackelford has done some really

0:06:30.000 --> 0:06:33.160
<v Speaker 2>good stuff with Who's the Who's the architect that redid it?

0:06:33.279 --> 0:06:35.719
<v Speaker 2>Scott Sherman, Yeah, he had a he had a two

0:06:35.720 --> 0:06:41.520
<v Speaker 2>part deal on the quadrilat Quadrilateral that is excellent. So

0:06:41.640 --> 0:06:44.159
<v Speaker 2>I just I love reading about all that stuff leading

0:06:44.200 --> 0:06:45.880
<v Speaker 2>into uh, into the Major week.

0:06:46.400 --> 0:06:48.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't know this is we're doing our five things.

0:06:48.520 --> 0:06:50.880
<v Speaker 1>So we did this with before the Masters. I think

0:06:50.920 --> 0:06:53.560
<v Speaker 1>we'll do this before every Major this year. We did

0:06:53.600 --> 0:06:56.400
<v Speaker 1>with Shane before the Masters. But you know, Kyle's on

0:06:56.560 --> 0:06:59.440
<v Speaker 1>for this one. But I think this leads into like

0:06:59.520 --> 0:07:03.840
<v Speaker 1>my first thing and like what I think about this Championship. Obviously,

0:07:03.880 --> 0:07:05.800
<v Speaker 1>the course has a good deal to do with it.

0:07:05.800 --> 0:07:08.560
<v Speaker 1>It's not one that we've seen a ton. Obviously we

0:07:08.600 --> 0:07:10.960
<v Speaker 1>saw it with Rory but a different time of year,

0:07:11.000 --> 0:07:13.160
<v Speaker 1>and we saw it at the pgat the Ryder Cup

0:07:13.160 --> 0:07:16.640
<v Speaker 1>in ninety one. But I feel like this is just

0:07:16.680 --> 0:07:21.120
<v Speaker 1>a total crapshoot. This tournament. I feel like I I

0:07:21.200 --> 0:07:23.400
<v Speaker 1>just don't have like a great feel. I don't think

0:07:23.440 --> 0:07:27.880
<v Speaker 1>anybody's playing like dominant golf leading in. And that's one

0:07:27.880 --> 0:07:30.040
<v Speaker 1>of the things I think about with this tournament is

0:07:30.120 --> 0:07:33.520
<v Speaker 1>just it feels like there's twenty guys that probably could win,

0:07:33.880 --> 0:07:36.160
<v Speaker 1>and I wouldn't be surprised if any of those twenty

0:07:36.160 --> 0:07:38.760
<v Speaker 1>guys won. I don't know if you feel the same way.

0:07:39.320 --> 0:07:42.240
<v Speaker 2>So my very first I'm not kidding, My very first

0:07:42.400 --> 0:07:46.440
<v Speaker 2>thing that I wrote down is the top ten lax juice.

0:07:46.760 --> 0:07:50.160
<v Speaker 2>And what I mean by that is other than Rory

0:07:50.920 --> 0:07:54.400
<v Speaker 2>uh and his man, I don't know his win at Quilhalla.

0:07:55.280 --> 0:07:59.240
<v Speaker 2>It wasn't it wasn't super inspiring. It was good. I'm

0:07:59.240 --> 0:08:02.680
<v Speaker 2>glad he won. I think that when Rory's playing well,

0:08:02.720 --> 0:08:04.800
<v Speaker 2>that's good for golf. But it was like I didn't

0:08:04.840 --> 0:08:07.240
<v Speaker 2>come away from that thinking like, oh, Rory's going to

0:08:07.320 --> 0:08:09.480
<v Speaker 2>go on a you know, just a heater right now.

0:08:10.360 --> 0:08:12.680
<v Speaker 2>And you go down the board of the top ten

0:08:12.760 --> 0:08:15.520
<v Speaker 2>guys in the world and it's just like, I don't

0:08:15.560 --> 0:08:19.480
<v Speaker 2>know who JT's kind of hitting it well, but who else?

0:08:19.560 --> 0:08:22.840
<v Speaker 2>Like what else? DJ, Well, that's the thing you got.

0:08:23.440 --> 0:08:26.240
<v Speaker 1>Rom hasn't been great, And obviously I think having the

0:08:26.280 --> 0:08:29.920
<v Speaker 1>baby's been like adjustment. I think that's something that we've

0:08:29.920 --> 0:08:33.400
<v Speaker 1>seen some people have these great, surreal performances when right

0:08:33.440 --> 0:08:35.720
<v Speaker 1>after they have a baby. But like, I think it's

0:08:35.760 --> 0:08:38.920
<v Speaker 1>a big adjustment. I think Rory went through it too. Yeah,

0:08:38.920 --> 0:08:41.080
<v Speaker 1>and I think like Rom's going through it. He just

0:08:41.200 --> 0:08:44.440
<v Speaker 1>was on his press conference talking about like how they've

0:08:44.440 --> 0:08:47.600
<v Speaker 1>had to, you know, make adjustments since they had this baby,

0:08:47.640 --> 0:08:50.320
<v Speaker 1>like that they realized things didn't work. He needed sleep, Like,

0:08:50.720 --> 0:08:52.840
<v Speaker 1>I think that's one of the things. But like, yeah, yeah,

0:08:52.880 --> 0:08:55.840
<v Speaker 1>like you said, Bryson's not playing well, Xander's kind of

0:08:55.920 --> 0:08:58.400
<v Speaker 1>ben Xander. He's super consistent, but we haven't seen the

0:08:58.440 --> 0:08:59.160
<v Speaker 1>winds pile up.

0:08:59.280 --> 0:09:00.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and more, you know.

0:09:00.880 --> 0:09:03.199
<v Speaker 1>And then you get Hatton who hasn't really done much

0:09:03.240 --> 0:09:08.640
<v Speaker 1>in majors and Patrick Reid. Yeah, I completely agree. Top ten.

0:09:09.720 --> 0:09:12.319
<v Speaker 1>When you think about to last year at the PGA,

0:09:12.760 --> 0:09:15.200
<v Speaker 1>how much different was we were talking about Brooks and

0:09:15.559 --> 0:09:19.240
<v Speaker 1>potential three Peete and how different just one year less

0:09:19.280 --> 0:09:21.559
<v Speaker 1>than a year really makes this feel.

0:09:21.760 --> 0:09:26.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, totally. Did you see Rom talking about First of all,

0:09:26.480 --> 0:09:30.040
<v Speaker 2>he goes into some details with his with like his

0:09:30.120 --> 0:09:32.080
<v Speaker 2>wife and kid, and I'm like, I don't know if

0:09:32.120 --> 0:09:34.960
<v Speaker 2>I need all of those, maybe just like cut it

0:09:35.000 --> 0:09:37.000
<v Speaker 2>in half and give me, give me half of it.

0:09:37.040 --> 0:09:41.760
<v Speaker 2>But he was talking about how after the first month

0:09:41.800 --> 0:09:44.560
<v Speaker 2>they hired somebody like a night nurse or a night

0:09:44.640 --> 0:09:46.280
<v Speaker 2>name and whatever you call it. I was like, Oh,

0:09:46.440 --> 0:09:49.240
<v Speaker 2>what's what's that like? That must be just be a

0:09:49.320 --> 0:09:51.959
<v Speaker 2>nice little route, a nice little path.

0:09:51.760 --> 0:09:55.560
<v Speaker 1>To take you can afford it. It's a good luxury.

0:09:55.280 --> 0:09:59.680
<v Speaker 2>To to kind of compound the thing that we're talking about.

0:10:00.320 --> 0:10:03.320
<v Speaker 2>The leaderboard from twenty twelve is crazy, right. So you've

0:10:03.320 --> 0:10:07.000
<v Speaker 2>got Rory at thirteen, and then beyond I know you

0:10:07.040 --> 0:10:09.360
<v Speaker 2>want to talk about the Swedish pancake, but beyond that,

0:10:09.720 --> 0:10:14.120
<v Speaker 2>it's Steve Stricker, it's Jamie Donaldson. It's all these guys

0:10:14.160 --> 0:10:18.400
<v Speaker 2>that you're like, what And I was curious if you

0:10:18.480 --> 0:10:22.920
<v Speaker 2>thought when it gets crazy windy out there, which it

0:10:22.960 --> 0:10:26.560
<v Speaker 2>did at times in twenty twelve, is that a thing

0:10:26.600 --> 0:10:29.199
<v Speaker 2>where nobody's hitting greens and so it becomes like kind

0:10:29.200 --> 0:10:31.559
<v Speaker 2>of a chipping contest. Is that why you see guys

0:10:31.600 --> 0:10:33.360
<v Speaker 2>like Stricker and those guys up there.

0:10:33.880 --> 0:10:36.480
<v Speaker 1>I think so to a certain extent. But what's interesting

0:10:36.559 --> 0:10:40.040
<v Speaker 1>about that is that the really windy day was Friday, right,

0:10:40.760 --> 0:10:44.440
<v Speaker 1>and Tiger and VJ were leading after Friday.

0:10:44.760 --> 0:10:49.320
<v Speaker 2>VJ shot a sixty nine on Friday. Oh epic round,

0:10:49.640 --> 0:10:54.520
<v Speaker 2>I mean, unbelievable. The quotes that from that round are

0:10:54.640 --> 0:10:57.960
<v Speaker 2>just insane. I wish I had them handy. I researched

0:10:58.040 --> 0:11:02.880
<v Speaker 2>him for a piece I did for the PGA dot Com.

0:11:02.920 --> 0:11:05.560
<v Speaker 2>But like the quotes from players about that round, like,

0:11:05.640 --> 0:11:08.360
<v Speaker 2>you know, like I can't believe. One of the guys

0:11:08.440 --> 0:11:10.920
<v Speaker 2>was like, you know, if this was if I didn't

0:11:10.960 --> 0:11:12.680
<v Speaker 2>have to play a term in golf today, I would

0:11:12.960 --> 0:11:15.400
<v Speaker 2>There'd be no way I'd be out there playing golf,

0:11:15.559 --> 0:11:16.320
<v Speaker 2>like you know.

0:11:18.280 --> 0:11:21.880
<v Speaker 1>But but that see, that's the interesting thing is the

0:11:21.920 --> 0:11:25.720
<v Speaker 1>board really changed when it was soft and not windy. Yeah,

0:11:25.720 --> 0:11:28.680
<v Speaker 1>when it was really hard, you had VJ and Tiger

0:11:28.760 --> 0:11:31.400
<v Speaker 1>at the top, and then it gets soft and and

0:11:31.480 --> 0:11:34.480
<v Speaker 1>Rory obviously blitz the field. Those guys fade. You know,

0:11:34.600 --> 0:11:38.480
<v Speaker 1>I think this golf course, it's it's really interesting in

0:11:38.600 --> 0:11:41.600
<v Speaker 1>terms of and this kind of I think plays into this.

0:11:41.920 --> 0:11:45.000
<v Speaker 1>I think it's anybody's kind of game. It's long, and

0:11:45.080 --> 0:11:48.560
<v Speaker 1>everybody's gonna look at the length and they're gonna say,

0:11:49.200 --> 0:11:53.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, you need to vombit. But you can't spray

0:11:53.200 --> 0:11:56.920
<v Speaker 1>it at all, Like when you're off the course. It's

0:11:56.960 --> 0:12:00.640
<v Speaker 1>not good like out of the corridors. So I think,

0:12:01.200 --> 0:12:03.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's set up flexibility. There's a ton of

0:12:03.280 --> 0:12:05.960
<v Speaker 1>flexibility with how Carrie Haig can set this golf course

0:12:06.040 --> 0:12:08.120
<v Speaker 1>up from distances. I don't think it's ever going to

0:12:08.160 --> 0:12:10.640
<v Speaker 1>play the yardage that is on the card and everybody's

0:12:10.679 --> 0:12:13.160
<v Speaker 1>talking about, oh, longest major course ever. It's not going

0:12:13.240 --> 0:12:15.800
<v Speaker 1>to play that way any day. It's gonna be dictated

0:12:15.840 --> 0:12:19.600
<v Speaker 1>on the wind. But I think it's a golf course

0:12:19.720 --> 0:12:22.800
<v Speaker 1>where you have to place it so well. I think

0:12:23.040 --> 0:12:27.240
<v Speaker 1>it's almost more like sawgrass. It's just a beefier sawgrass

0:12:27.600 --> 0:12:28.080
<v Speaker 1>in a way.

0:12:28.840 --> 0:12:32.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I agree with that because when we think about length,

0:12:32.559 --> 0:12:34.679
<v Speaker 2>and I was going through kind of the longest majors

0:12:34.720 --> 0:12:37.440
<v Speaker 2>ever because you know that's gonna be kind of the

0:12:37.559 --> 0:12:42.160
<v Speaker 2>hot like phrase or buzzword or whatever. But it's not

0:12:42.200 --> 0:12:46.040
<v Speaker 2>a It's a very different kind of length than Beth

0:12:46.120 --> 0:12:49.959
<v Speaker 2>Page or even in Aaron Hills, right, because you're you're

0:12:50.040 --> 0:12:52.960
<v Speaker 2>almost it's not it's not just like hey see how

0:12:53.000 --> 0:12:54.959
<v Speaker 2>far you can hit it, and then see how far

0:12:55.040 --> 0:12:58.439
<v Speaker 2>you can hit it again, and even like wingfoot was

0:12:58.480 --> 0:13:00.000
<v Speaker 2>a little bit like that because there's no there's no

0:13:00.160 --> 0:13:02.640
<v Speaker 2>trouble there, right, I mean there's no there's trouble, but

0:13:02.679 --> 0:13:07.240
<v Speaker 2>there's not there's no penalty trouble. And so that's where

0:13:07.320 --> 0:13:10.079
<v Speaker 2>somebody like I think somebody like Bryson and even a

0:13:10.160 --> 0:13:14.280
<v Speaker 2>rom is gonna have to be incredibly disciplined and patient

0:13:14.520 --> 0:13:18.120
<v Speaker 2>this week because because you can't, you don't just like

0:13:18.200 --> 0:13:22.240
<v Speaker 2>take the course on. You have to be so strategic

0:13:22.320 --> 0:13:24.240
<v Speaker 2>and careful about where you're placing the ball. I think

0:13:24.280 --> 0:13:26.679
<v Speaker 2>that's kind of plays into somebody like Jordan Spie Sands.

0:13:26.720 --> 0:13:30.720
<v Speaker 1>Honestly, I agree like somebody, I think there's different types

0:13:30.760 --> 0:13:34.240
<v Speaker 1>of great ball strikers, Like I think Bryson's a great

0:13:34.280 --> 0:13:35.000
<v Speaker 1>ball striker.

0:13:35.280 --> 0:13:36.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but you.

0:13:36.400 --> 0:13:38.200
<v Speaker 1>Know, I think one of the things he does the

0:13:38.200 --> 0:13:40.480
<v Speaker 1>way he, you know, is a great ball striker, is

0:13:40.480 --> 0:13:43.480
<v Speaker 1>he overwhelms golf course with his power. And he did

0:13:43.559 --> 0:13:47.040
<v Speaker 1>that obviously at wing Foot this golf course. If you

0:13:47.480 --> 0:13:49.920
<v Speaker 1>if you're a little off, you're out of play. The

0:13:50.320 --> 0:13:52.080
<v Speaker 1>guy that I kind of think of when he's hitting

0:13:52.080 --> 0:13:55.760
<v Speaker 1>on all cylinders who could play really well is like Fleetwood,

0:13:56.000 --> 0:13:59.200
<v Speaker 1>where he's like surgical, where he is that the longest guy.

0:13:59.760 --> 0:14:03.960
<v Speaker 1>He's plenty long, but he's just Fairway green, Fairway green,

0:14:04.040 --> 0:14:06.719
<v Speaker 1>Fairway green. Or when we saw him, moll And I'm

0:14:06.720 --> 0:14:09.400
<v Speaker 1>not saying Molinard he's going to play well this week

0:14:09.440 --> 0:14:11.679
<v Speaker 1>because we haven't really seen him. But when I think about,

0:14:11.720 --> 0:14:15.160
<v Speaker 1>like how Molinari played in twenty eighteen when he won

0:14:15.200 --> 0:14:19.680
<v Speaker 1>the Open, like that type of play is what I

0:14:19.720 --> 0:14:23.600
<v Speaker 1>think we'll we'll end up playing really well at this major. Yeah,

0:14:23.760 --> 0:14:25.720
<v Speaker 1>you want to talk about Speith, That's.

0:14:25.560 --> 0:14:30.000
<v Speaker 2>My number two is the Space Slam. We just we

0:14:30.160 --> 0:14:31.160
<v Speaker 2>just copied each other.

0:14:32.360 --> 0:14:34.280
<v Speaker 1>We didn't send these to each other before.

0:14:34.720 --> 0:14:39.000
<v Speaker 2>So the Speed Slam is and people keeps it. So

0:14:39.120 --> 0:14:40.680
<v Speaker 2>I got to get this off my chest because one

0:14:40.680 --> 0:14:42.800
<v Speaker 2>thing that bothers me is people keep saying, well, this

0:14:42.840 --> 0:14:45.760
<v Speaker 2>is his best opportunity since twenty eighteen. First of all,

0:14:46.240 --> 0:14:49.280
<v Speaker 2>he played Quolhalla in twenty seventeen with an opportunity to

0:14:49.360 --> 0:14:52.680
<v Speaker 2>win the Slam, right right after he won Birkdale. Yeah,

0:14:52.720 --> 0:14:54.920
<v Speaker 2>and that was actually his best opportunity because that was

0:14:54.960 --> 0:14:57.960
<v Speaker 2>as well as he's ever played, I think as a professional.

0:14:59.200 --> 0:15:02.240
<v Speaker 2>I heard him on the No Laning Up podcast two

0:15:02.280 --> 0:15:05.640
<v Speaker 2>weeks ago. He's like twenty eighteen, I was just kind

0:15:05.640 --> 0:15:08.040
<v Speaker 2>of lost. I think he was actually talking about the

0:15:08.080 --> 0:15:13.560
<v Speaker 2>pgat where was it Bell Reeve and twenty seventeen was

0:15:13.600 --> 0:15:18.560
<v Speaker 2>actually his real, like hey, career Slam opportunity. But I

0:15:18.600 --> 0:15:21.280
<v Speaker 2>do agree. I do think I actually think this course

0:15:22.520 --> 0:15:24.720
<v Speaker 2>sets up well for him, and I think the excitement

0:15:25.400 --> 0:15:30.920
<v Speaker 2>for me with him is in whatever. The Byron Nelson

0:15:31.040 --> 0:15:34.080
<v Speaker 2>is not a great test of like where your game's at,

0:15:34.160 --> 0:15:36.600
<v Speaker 2>But for him to come out and hit it like

0:15:36.680 --> 0:15:40.440
<v Speaker 2>he did, I felt like completely validated everything that led

0:15:40.520 --> 0:15:43.080
<v Speaker 2>up to the Masters. Because we see these guys go

0:15:43.160 --> 0:15:45.880
<v Speaker 2>on runs where they'll play great leading up to the Major,

0:15:45.960 --> 0:15:48.640
<v Speaker 2>they'll play great at the Major, and then they'll just

0:15:48.680 --> 0:15:50.440
<v Speaker 2>fall off, like they'll just kind of have a dip

0:15:50.520 --> 0:15:55.040
<v Speaker 2>after that. It's a very normal kind of progression in

0:15:55.280 --> 0:15:58.800
<v Speaker 2>PGA Tour world. And he hasn't. He's still hitting it

0:15:58.920 --> 0:16:02.160
<v Speaker 2>like the best player in the world. So I don't know.

0:16:02.240 --> 0:16:04.360
<v Speaker 2>I think there's a ton of reason. Is he gonna

0:16:04.360 --> 0:16:06.640
<v Speaker 2>win this week? I have no idea, but I think

0:16:06.640 --> 0:16:09.120
<v Speaker 2>there's a ton of reason to be excited about his chances.

0:16:09.600 --> 0:16:12.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I agree. I think one of the things you

0:16:12.520 --> 0:16:16.080
<v Speaker 1>hit onto earlier is it's a golf course, especially when

0:16:16.120 --> 0:16:18.200
<v Speaker 1>it gets when if it gets windy, and I think

0:16:18.200 --> 0:16:21.120
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be have some good wind out there, like

0:16:21.200 --> 0:16:23.600
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna have to scramble because people are gonna miss

0:16:23.640 --> 0:16:28.400
<v Speaker 1>greens and nobody he just has. He's like the guy

0:16:28.440 --> 0:16:30.920
<v Speaker 1>that you look up at the end of a basketball

0:16:30.960 --> 0:16:33.440
<v Speaker 1>game and you're like, how did he get? Like, you know,

0:16:33.480 --> 0:16:36.120
<v Speaker 1>how does he have twenty five points? He didn't even

0:16:36.280 --> 0:16:38.800
<v Speaker 1>like look like he did. Like he shoots sixty seven

0:16:39.120 --> 0:16:40.720
<v Speaker 1>and you're like, how did that? How do you shoot

0:16:40.720 --> 0:16:41.360
<v Speaker 1>sixty seven?

0:16:41.560 --> 0:16:43.480
<v Speaker 2>I always think it is that like Tim Duncan.

0:16:43.920 --> 0:16:47.160
<v Speaker 1>Tim Duncan would be a perfect comparison, Like it just

0:16:47.200 --> 0:16:50.760
<v Speaker 1>goes about it in such a like fundamental way. It's

0:16:50.760 --> 0:16:54.760
<v Speaker 1>not like pretty, it's not rory, but it's just the

0:16:54.800 --> 0:16:56.000
<v Speaker 1>way he scores.

0:16:56.560 --> 0:16:57.440
<v Speaker 2>He just scores.

0:16:57.640 --> 0:17:00.240
<v Speaker 1>He gets the ball in the hole so efficiently. You know,

0:17:00.280 --> 0:17:02.720
<v Speaker 1>he might not have the prettiest swing, but he's just

0:17:03.680 --> 0:17:06.520
<v Speaker 1>nobody scores better than him out there. And obviously he's

0:17:06.560 --> 0:17:09.960
<v Speaker 1>been playing so well. And I think I always like

0:17:10.040 --> 0:17:13.480
<v Speaker 1>when guys play well the week before and are in

0:17:13.520 --> 0:17:16.320
<v Speaker 1>the mix, but don't get it done. Like I think

0:17:16.359 --> 0:17:19.720
<v Speaker 1>that's like the perfect way to head into major is

0:17:19.760 --> 0:17:22.480
<v Speaker 1>to play well the week before, but not great because

0:17:22.480 --> 0:17:24.720
<v Speaker 1>then it just kind of clicks in the next week.

0:17:25.119 --> 0:17:27.879
<v Speaker 2>Do you worry about him, or really anybody out there

0:17:28.080 --> 0:17:30.800
<v Speaker 2>having to work it both ways off the tea, Like,

0:17:31.000 --> 0:17:34.000
<v Speaker 2>how much do you have to? Because I definitely think

0:17:34.000 --> 0:17:35.879
<v Speaker 2>you have to with some of your approach shots. But

0:17:36.200 --> 0:17:38.440
<v Speaker 2>is there a necessity to work it both ways off

0:17:38.480 --> 0:17:38.760
<v Speaker 2>the tee?

0:17:39.520 --> 0:17:43.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that much out there. I don't think

0:17:43.240 --> 0:17:46.360
<v Speaker 1>there's like a super big need you know, a few

0:17:46.400 --> 0:17:48.720
<v Speaker 1>t shots that it could be helpful. Yeah, but one

0:17:48.760 --> 0:17:50.639
<v Speaker 1>of the things, you know, and where it could be

0:17:50.680 --> 0:17:54.480
<v Speaker 1>helpful is with crosswinds. You know, just being able to

0:17:54.520 --> 0:17:58.399
<v Speaker 1>hold stuff against the wind is kind of where it

0:17:58.480 --> 0:18:01.240
<v Speaker 1>might be most helpful. I don't think it's that big

0:18:01.240 --> 0:18:05.080
<v Speaker 1>of a deal out here. The fairways aren't that wide. Also,

0:18:06.200 --> 0:18:08.840
<v Speaker 1>they don't they don't move that much. I mean, there's

0:18:08.880 --> 0:18:11.720
<v Speaker 1>definitely preferred shot shapes, but I think a lot of

0:18:11.760 --> 0:18:14.560
<v Speaker 1>them moving moving that left right's fine. There aren't a

0:18:14.560 --> 0:18:16.639
<v Speaker 1>ton of draw holes out there. Yeah, there's only a

0:18:16.640 --> 0:18:19.560
<v Speaker 1>couple draw holes where you would say, oh, you want

0:18:19.560 --> 0:18:21.800
<v Speaker 1>to hit a draw here. So I think that that's

0:18:21.840 --> 0:18:24.120
<v Speaker 1>good for him because that squeeze cut is kind of

0:18:24.160 --> 0:18:25.080
<v Speaker 1>his go to shot.

0:18:25.640 --> 0:18:30.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, it definitely is. Yeah. I just think about well,

0:18:30.119 --> 0:18:32.920
<v Speaker 2>I mean I think about Sawgrass where it's whatever the

0:18:32.920 --> 0:18:35.240
<v Speaker 2>third or fourth hole where you you have to hit

0:18:35.240 --> 0:18:37.560
<v Speaker 2>a draw off the tee or you hit it.

0:18:37.560 --> 0:18:40.960
<v Speaker 1>There's nothing like that out here, yeah, just because you know,

0:18:41.000 --> 0:18:42.360
<v Speaker 1>they don't have those like trees.

0:18:42.720 --> 0:18:43.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, like that.

0:18:43.600 --> 0:18:45.879
<v Speaker 1>It's it's just wide open. So they have bunkers that

0:18:46.080 --> 0:18:50.480
<v Speaker 1>make you hit shapes, but they aren't anything like Sawgrass.

0:18:50.840 --> 0:18:54.080
<v Speaker 2>Man, I am so fascinated by and this is always true,

0:18:54.119 --> 0:18:56.480
<v Speaker 2>this is actually more true of us opens. But I'm

0:18:56.520 --> 0:19:00.119
<v Speaker 2>fascinated to see how guys strategize their way around on

0:19:00.160 --> 0:19:03.000
<v Speaker 2>the course, because you know, the thing you keep hearing

0:19:03.000 --> 0:19:04.320
<v Speaker 2>and I think you guys might have touched on this

0:19:04.400 --> 0:19:07.200
<v Speaker 2>on your video, is like it looks like it should

0:19:07.200 --> 0:19:11.240
<v Speaker 2>be a Lynx course, but you've got these almost Pinehurst

0:19:11.359 --> 0:19:15.879
<v Speaker 2>type greens where it's it's their bowls and their or

0:19:15.920 --> 0:19:19.480
<v Speaker 2>their upside down bowls, their volcanoes. You know. I think

0:19:19.480 --> 0:19:22.760
<v Speaker 2>I saw a quote from it might have been twenty

0:19:22.840 --> 0:19:26.360
<v Speaker 2>twelve somebody that was in contention saying like it's it's

0:19:26.480 --> 0:19:28.720
<v Speaker 2>very unlike a links course where you can't run it

0:19:28.800 --> 0:19:30.879
<v Speaker 2>up there. You have to hit a really high shot,

0:19:31.280 --> 0:19:33.639
<v Speaker 2>and the problem is you've got a twenty five mile

0:19:33.680 --> 0:19:36.199
<v Speaker 2>an hour wind knocking down that shot. So I'm just

0:19:36.359 --> 0:19:38.760
<v Speaker 2>I'm I'm really intrigued to see how guys kind of

0:19:38.760 --> 0:19:42.280
<v Speaker 2>handle that, especially if you know, like Rom said, it's

0:19:42.280 --> 0:19:45.399
<v Speaker 2>playing pretty fast and firm as it is early on

0:19:45.440 --> 0:19:45.840
<v Speaker 2>in the week.

0:19:46.960 --> 0:19:49.400
<v Speaker 1>Well, I think that's what the really neat thing about

0:19:49.480 --> 0:19:53.080
<v Speaker 1>about this tournament. And I think that's why when I

0:19:53.359 --> 0:19:55.280
<v Speaker 1>when I thought about the majors, I thought this was

0:19:55.320 --> 0:19:57.280
<v Speaker 1>probably going to be one of the maybe the most

0:19:57.320 --> 0:19:59.480
<v Speaker 1>compelling one. You know, if you take out the Augusta

0:19:59.520 --> 0:20:02.119
<v Speaker 1>every year, you know, the most compelling one was just

0:20:02.200 --> 0:20:06.080
<v Speaker 1>because it's like the most opposite of driving range golf,

0:20:06.160 --> 0:20:09.720
<v Speaker 1>like that idea of like the simulation golf where everything's

0:20:09.720 --> 0:20:13.520
<v Speaker 1>a perfect setting, flat lie, no wind, and you're just

0:20:13.600 --> 0:20:16.600
<v Speaker 1>hitting balls at a target like this, this golf course

0:20:16.840 --> 0:20:20.600
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna have. And one of the neat things is

0:20:21.240 --> 0:20:23.879
<v Speaker 1>it's easy to look at six through thirteen and you

0:20:23.920 --> 0:20:26.800
<v Speaker 1>say they all play in the same direction. But what

0:20:27.320 --> 0:20:31.440
<v Speaker 1>it does is it just kind of wiggles different directions

0:20:31.640 --> 0:20:35.160
<v Speaker 1>and the way die orients these holes. If you look

0:20:35.200 --> 0:20:38.800
<v Speaker 1>at it closely, you'll see that the t shot will

0:20:38.840 --> 0:20:41.240
<v Speaker 1>go one way, the approach shot will go a little

0:20:41.280 --> 0:20:44.600
<v Speaker 1>bit different way. So the wind, while you're playing the

0:20:44.640 --> 0:20:47.800
<v Speaker 1>same general direction for a large stretches of these of

0:20:47.840 --> 0:20:51.919
<v Speaker 1>the golf course, you're always playing a slightly different angle,

0:20:52.080 --> 0:20:56.159
<v Speaker 1>which makes it just very uncomfortable. So really, like, you know,

0:20:56.280 --> 0:20:59.800
<v Speaker 1>they got the rangefinders, but if it's blowing out there,

0:21:00.400 --> 0:21:03.040
<v Speaker 1>the type of golf where the number really doesn't matter,

0:21:03.200 --> 0:21:06.200
<v Speaker 1>you're you're standing there trying to figure out how many

0:21:06.240 --> 0:21:08.919
<v Speaker 1>extra clubs or you know, what's the wind gonna do.

0:21:09.000 --> 0:21:11.560
<v Speaker 1>And then one of the other things that can be

0:21:11.640 --> 0:21:14.080
<v Speaker 1>really nasty out there is you're hitting these elevator greens

0:21:14.080 --> 0:21:16.040
<v Speaker 1>and you get a wedge in your hand is downwind,

0:21:16.440 --> 0:21:18.320
<v Speaker 1>that wind can knock the ball out of the air,

0:21:18.480 --> 0:21:20.760
<v Speaker 1>and with the greens elevated, it just hits into the

0:21:20.800 --> 0:21:22.240
<v Speaker 1>front and it's gonna end.

0:21:22.160 --> 0:21:22.720
<v Speaker 2>Up at the bottom.

0:21:23.160 --> 0:21:26.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, the player that wins this week is going

0:21:26.880 --> 0:21:30.520
<v Speaker 1>to have to, you know, have all his senses like

0:21:30.720 --> 0:21:33.200
<v Speaker 1>on high alert. And that's what I think it's gonna

0:21:33.200 --> 0:21:35.720
<v Speaker 1>be so fun to watch. And that's where speed, that's

0:21:35.760 --> 0:21:38.840
<v Speaker 1>what going back to speak, that makes speak so much

0:21:38.880 --> 0:21:41.159
<v Speaker 1>sense because he's he's that type of player.

0:21:41.920 --> 0:21:44.960
<v Speaker 2>I heard Rom talking about how the wind is is

0:21:45.800 --> 0:21:48.560
<v Speaker 2>it's a different kind of wind than other courses because

0:21:48.600 --> 0:21:51.080
<v Speaker 2>it's so dense right by that, like so humid right

0:21:51.080 --> 0:21:53.240
<v Speaker 2>by the ocean. And as soon as he said that,

0:21:53.280 --> 0:21:56.119
<v Speaker 2>I was like, Oh, Bryson's gonna play like seven hour rounds.

0:21:56.160 --> 0:21:59.120
<v Speaker 2>This is gonna be a just an abomination. Like how

0:21:59.119 --> 0:22:00.359
<v Speaker 2>long he's gonna be out You're.

0:22:00.280 --> 0:22:03.720
<v Speaker 1>Trying to feed this out air density. I mean, he's

0:22:03.760 --> 0:22:08.040
<v Speaker 1>gonna be maybe he's got a win guy. You know, Kyle,

0:22:08.160 --> 0:22:12.240
<v Speaker 1>I played a junior tournament at the Ocean Course years ago,

0:22:12.800 --> 0:22:15.240
<v Speaker 1>and it was it was in the middle of January,

0:22:15.280 --> 0:22:18.680
<v Speaker 1>and I'll never forget just sitting in my car before

0:22:19.000 --> 0:22:21.320
<v Speaker 1>the round. It was like seven am and it was

0:22:21.480 --> 0:22:23.919
<v Speaker 1>it was like thirty five degrees out with like a

0:22:23.960 --> 0:22:26.119
<v Speaker 1>twenty mile an hour window coming off the ocean. I

0:22:26.200 --> 0:22:28.879
<v Speaker 1>just didn't want to go outside. Yeah, And that's the

0:22:28.920 --> 0:22:32.359
<v Speaker 1>thing the Ocean Course is just it can be just

0:22:32.720 --> 0:22:35.159
<v Speaker 1>so you just don't want to hit golf shots in

0:22:35.560 --> 0:22:38.040
<v Speaker 1>the wind, even like calm days are windy out there.

0:22:38.440 --> 0:22:40.800
<v Speaker 2>That's the quote that you guys started your video with

0:22:41.040 --> 0:22:44.480
<v Speaker 2>was it's of course you want to play again next

0:22:44.560 --> 0:22:46.880
<v Speaker 2>year but not tomorrow. And I feel you that's such

0:22:46.880 --> 0:22:48.560
<v Speaker 2>a like you just want to kick the can down

0:22:48.600 --> 0:22:50.439
<v Speaker 2>the road a little bit, which is such a good,

0:22:51.080 --> 0:22:54.159
<v Speaker 2>good description of it. You want my number three here? Yeah, okay,

0:22:54.880 --> 0:22:57.800
<v Speaker 2>So we touched on this a little bit earlier, but

0:22:58.040 --> 0:23:03.560
<v Speaker 2>for me, it's it's what strategy does Bryson employ on

0:23:03.600 --> 0:23:08.080
<v Speaker 2>this course? And this is sort of a not I'm

0:23:08.080 --> 0:23:10.640
<v Speaker 2>not just talking about Bryson. I'm talking about all the bombers,

0:23:10.640 --> 0:23:13.400
<v Speaker 2>but I think we always run to Bryson for like, oh,

0:23:13.480 --> 0:23:16.680
<v Speaker 2>what's what's he gonna do? And I've got a stat here.

0:23:17.000 --> 0:23:21.920
<v Speaker 2>He is two hundred and fifth on tour in proximity

0:23:21.960 --> 0:23:24.040
<v Speaker 2>to the edge of the fair away. And so what

0:23:24.080 --> 0:23:26.119
<v Speaker 2>that means is like when his when he misses, he

0:23:26.160 --> 0:23:30.200
<v Speaker 2>misses by a lot, right, Like his misses are huge.

0:23:30.240 --> 0:23:32.960
<v Speaker 2>And that makes sense because he's, you know, the longest

0:23:33.000 --> 0:23:35.560
<v Speaker 2>guy in the world. Like if he's off by a

0:23:35.560 --> 0:23:38.600
<v Speaker 2>little bit, it feels like a lot more than that

0:23:38.840 --> 0:23:42.400
<v Speaker 2>because he's so far out there. So I'm just intrigued

0:23:42.400 --> 0:23:44.399
<v Speaker 2>by it. I wonder if he hits a bunch of

0:23:44.480 --> 0:23:47.800
<v Speaker 2>irons off the tea. I wonder if he tries to

0:23:47.800 --> 0:23:50.800
<v Speaker 2>carry some some spots where other guys I don't know.

0:23:50.840 --> 0:23:53.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm just really intrigued by kind of how that plays

0:23:53.040 --> 0:23:54.800
<v Speaker 2>out going into the week.

0:23:55.520 --> 0:23:58.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think, you know, when you think about what

0:23:58.440 --> 0:24:02.400
<v Speaker 1>he set out to do when he added all the speed,

0:24:02.600 --> 0:24:06.000
<v Speaker 1>added all the weight, it really was a reaction to

0:24:06.520 --> 0:24:09.760
<v Speaker 1>Beth Page. Will Gray had that got those great quotes

0:24:09.800 --> 0:24:12.919
<v Speaker 1>from him talking about Brooks, and it was all a

0:24:12.920 --> 0:24:15.640
<v Speaker 1>reaction to Beth Page. And then it it bore out

0:24:15.720 --> 0:24:18.320
<v Speaker 1>that he won it wing foot of similar setup thick

0:24:18.440 --> 0:24:21.200
<v Speaker 1>rough yep, you know where if you just hit it far,

0:24:21.440 --> 0:24:23.080
<v Speaker 1>you can then gouge it out of the thick rough.

0:24:23.160 --> 0:24:25.320
<v Speaker 1>This that doesn't work here because if you hit it

0:24:25.359 --> 0:24:28.080
<v Speaker 1>far and you're offline, you're out of play. And I

0:24:28.080 --> 0:24:31.880
<v Speaker 1>think that's where, Yeah, I agree with that take it.

0:24:32.000 --> 0:24:33.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how he's gonna play it. I think

0:24:33.880 --> 0:24:37.160
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of holes. That's kind of the luxury though.

0:24:37.520 --> 0:24:39.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, he can hit his iron as far as

0:24:39.080 --> 0:24:41.320
<v Speaker 1>some of these guys that you know, like Matt Matt

0:24:41.359 --> 0:24:42.600
<v Speaker 1>Fitzpatrick hits his driver.

0:24:43.080 --> 0:24:46.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, he has options where other guys don't. Like Matt

0:24:46.320 --> 0:24:49.280
<v Speaker 2>Matt Fitzpatriy doesn't have an option. I mean he does,

0:24:49.359 --> 0:24:51.159
<v Speaker 2>but I mean, he's gonna miss a cut if he

0:24:51.359 --> 0:24:54.280
<v Speaker 2>if he chooses some of the options that are that

0:24:54.359 --> 0:24:57.640
<v Speaker 2>are you know at hand and Bryson has a bunch

0:24:57.640 --> 0:24:59.920
<v Speaker 2>of options and and got and I don't know. I

0:25:00.160 --> 0:25:02.239
<v Speaker 2>I think that's why. And we don't need to get

0:25:02.280 --> 0:25:05.919
<v Speaker 2>into like a distance deal. But that's why. So like

0:25:06.200 --> 0:25:09.440
<v Speaker 2>the majors, especially PGA's and US Opens are won by

0:25:09.960 --> 0:25:14.600
<v Speaker 2>six guys, right, is they have so many options at

0:25:14.640 --> 0:25:18.040
<v Speaker 2>their disposal for the way these courses are played. And

0:25:19.080 --> 0:25:21.040
<v Speaker 2>you know, not to take away from like you have

0:25:21.080 --> 0:25:22.960
<v Speaker 2>to have a great short game, you have to hit

0:25:23.000 --> 0:25:26.560
<v Speaker 2>your wedges great, but it is it does give them

0:25:26.600 --> 0:25:30.720
<v Speaker 2>so much more wiggle room whenever they're they're playing courses

0:25:30.800 --> 0:25:31.040
<v Speaker 2>like this.

0:25:31.640 --> 0:25:34.119
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, if you look at the distance rank of the

0:25:34.119 --> 0:25:37.560
<v Speaker 1>the last ten or so winners of the PGA or

0:25:38.200 --> 0:25:41.720
<v Speaker 1>of the US Open, they're really power players. It's a

0:25:41.720 --> 0:25:45.840
<v Speaker 1>power players championship versus the masters in the in the

0:25:45.880 --> 0:25:48.440
<v Speaker 1>Open Championship, they have a lot of balance. You see

0:25:48.480 --> 0:25:51.119
<v Speaker 1>guys all over the board win those in terms of

0:25:51.160 --> 0:25:54.760
<v Speaker 1>their you know, associated distance rank. This golf course, I

0:25:54.760 --> 0:25:57.840
<v Speaker 1>think is going to play more like like a sagress.

0:25:57.880 --> 0:25:59.960
<v Speaker 1>Like one of the things that Pete Die Pete Dies

0:26:00.080 --> 0:26:04.200
<v Speaker 1>golf courses longevity wise, have held up so well to distance,

0:26:04.440 --> 0:26:07.800
<v Speaker 1>and it's because of just the little angle, angular tweaks

0:26:07.800 --> 0:26:10.879
<v Speaker 1>that he makes. Yeah, I think that that make it

0:26:11.000 --> 0:26:15.080
<v Speaker 1>so uncomfortable to hit driver in certain places for long hitters.

0:26:15.480 --> 0:26:18.159
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, I think that's a that's a great point.

0:26:18.359 --> 0:26:21.960
<v Speaker 1>I want piggybacking off of that and looking, We've talked

0:26:21.960 --> 0:26:24.720
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about the twenty twelve leader board, but

0:26:25.080 --> 0:26:27.320
<v Speaker 1>I think this could be a week where we it

0:26:27.520 --> 0:26:30.399
<v Speaker 1>really favors veterans and and part of that is playing

0:26:30.400 --> 0:26:33.320
<v Speaker 1>in the conditions too, where these guys have seen a lot.

0:26:34.160 --> 0:26:36.719
<v Speaker 1>When it gets Wendy, experience matters, like you have to

0:26:36.760 --> 0:26:39.359
<v Speaker 1>have a lot of different golf shots. And I think

0:26:40.000 --> 0:26:42.239
<v Speaker 1>I think we could see a week where, you know,

0:26:42.600 --> 0:26:44.920
<v Speaker 1>we might have some guys that are in the mix

0:26:45.040 --> 0:26:48.919
<v Speaker 1>that you know, are looking to bag that last major

0:26:49.160 --> 0:26:50.840
<v Speaker 1>that adds a ton to their legacy.

0:26:51.280 --> 0:26:55.480
<v Speaker 2>So you're so you're talking about Europeans that have that

0:26:55.560 --> 0:26:57.639
<v Speaker 2>are great ball strikers that have a bunch of it

0:26:57.640 --> 0:26:58.800
<v Speaker 2>feels like a trojan horse.

0:27:00.119 --> 0:27:02.600
<v Speaker 1>The one thing I'm worried about with Westy is is

0:27:02.680 --> 0:27:05.600
<v Speaker 1>the chipping around the greens yeah, that's what I'm a

0:27:05.600 --> 0:27:11.359
<v Speaker 1>little right, but he's not really. I'm also talking about

0:27:11.359 --> 0:27:14.520
<v Speaker 1>like Adam Scott, Sergio Garcia.

0:27:14.480 --> 0:27:17.560
<v Speaker 2>You know, Sergia. Yeah, Sergia is interesting, I think. And

0:27:17.720 --> 0:27:20.840
<v Speaker 2>Rory talked about this right with twenty twelve where he's like,

0:27:20.880 --> 0:27:23.600
<v Speaker 2>I've never been my shore game's never been that good,

0:27:24.040 --> 0:27:27.000
<v Speaker 2>and I think that is like really instructive for how

0:27:27.040 --> 0:27:30.280
<v Speaker 2>to think about this week. So we run to like,

0:27:30.440 --> 0:27:33.080
<v Speaker 2>oh he was. I talked to Jim Nance about this

0:27:33.200 --> 0:27:35.960
<v Speaker 2>and he was like, I was pure poetry off the tee,

0:27:36.080 --> 0:27:39.120
<v Speaker 2>and of course it was. It always is. But your

0:27:39.119 --> 0:27:41.920
<v Speaker 2>shot game has to be unreal this week, I think

0:27:42.040 --> 0:27:44.720
<v Speaker 2>to be able to win this golf tournament. So yeah,

0:27:44.760 --> 0:27:46.679
<v Speaker 2>that's where the Westy think my.

0:27:47.240 --> 0:27:51.119
<v Speaker 1>Fall apart part completely. I mean I think also like

0:27:51.160 --> 0:27:55.680
<v Speaker 1>you look at like Patrick Reid a Web Simpson, if

0:27:55.680 --> 0:27:59.119
<v Speaker 1>they can have one of those special ball striking weeks,

0:27:59.440 --> 0:28:02.679
<v Speaker 1>then all sudden everything falls into place for them because

0:28:02.840 --> 0:28:05.720
<v Speaker 1>of how good they are. But also Paul Casey Louiu

0:28:05.840 --> 0:28:10.240
<v Speaker 1>stays in you know those types of players where they've

0:28:10.240 --> 0:28:13.399
<v Speaker 1>seed it all, they've played in everything. Yeah, and this

0:28:13.480 --> 0:28:15.439
<v Speaker 1>is a type of golf course you can play perfect

0:28:15.520 --> 0:28:17.320
<v Speaker 1>and then a big number can just come bite you.

0:28:17.359 --> 0:28:20.119
<v Speaker 1>I think I think Furick made like an eight on

0:28:20.680 --> 0:28:23.959
<v Speaker 1>thirteen in twenty twelve, and he was playing just like

0:28:24.000 --> 0:28:26.760
<v Speaker 1>a basically didn't miss a shot all round and then

0:28:26.840 --> 0:28:27.720
<v Speaker 1>makes makes an eight.

0:28:28.640 --> 0:28:30.080
<v Speaker 2>The guy that I really want to pick because he

0:28:30.119 --> 0:28:32.199
<v Speaker 2>doesn't have any holes and because his short game is

0:28:32.280 --> 0:28:36.159
<v Speaker 2>really good is somebody who's missed like five cuts in

0:28:36.200 --> 0:28:39.960
<v Speaker 2>a row, which is Patrick Cantlay, and I can't. I can't.

0:28:40.000 --> 0:28:42.640
<v Speaker 2>I can't pick him because he's playing terribly, or at

0:28:42.720 --> 0:28:46.080
<v Speaker 2>least he's he's not playing like he doesn't have any momentum,

0:28:46.160 --> 0:28:49.840
<v Speaker 2>but his like his sort of statistical profile to me,

0:28:50.720 --> 0:28:54.160
<v Speaker 2>fits a place like Kiowa, so well, I don't know.

0:28:54.280 --> 0:28:56.080
<v Speaker 2>I think, like I don't know if you agree with this.

0:28:56.160 --> 0:28:58.600
<v Speaker 2>I think Kiwa is going to play as a PGA

0:28:58.720 --> 0:29:02.760
<v Speaker 2>championship a lot different than we've seen over the last

0:29:02.800 --> 0:29:05.280
<v Speaker 2>five or six years. Definitely different than a Beth Page,

0:29:05.280 --> 0:29:07.920
<v Speaker 2>but also way different than a Bell Reeve as well.

0:29:08.280 --> 0:29:11.840
<v Speaker 2>I just I think it stands out as it's not

0:29:12.000 --> 0:29:13.560
<v Speaker 2>a I think you're right. I think it's a little

0:29:13.600 --> 0:29:16.800
<v Speaker 2>bit like a players championship, and we've seen big numbers.

0:29:16.840 --> 0:29:19.520
<v Speaker 2>One of players we've seen small. We've seen, you know,

0:29:20.000 --> 0:29:22.320
<v Speaker 2>lesser numbers one of players. I think it's gonna be

0:29:23.000 --> 0:29:25.400
<v Speaker 2>and even in talking about who's gonna win, it feels

0:29:25.440 --> 0:29:28.840
<v Speaker 2>a little bit like that of like this feels wide open,

0:29:28.960 --> 0:29:31.080
<v Speaker 2>and that's what we say every year around the Players

0:29:31.120 --> 0:29:32.720
<v Speaker 2>Championship as well.

0:29:32.800 --> 0:29:34.760
<v Speaker 1>I think it's going to be like a hybrid of

0:29:34.760 --> 0:29:37.520
<v Speaker 1>the players in an open because you have the weather

0:29:38.440 --> 0:29:42.560
<v Speaker 1>aspects and we could see, like I'll never forget walking

0:29:42.840 --> 0:29:46.920
<v Speaker 1>a practice round with Jordan Speith at Aaron Hills and

0:29:47.400 --> 0:29:50.840
<v Speaker 1>the group was talking about just a what's the easiest

0:29:50.880 --> 0:29:54.680
<v Speaker 1>major to win, and it was just immediately open Championship

0:29:55.320 --> 0:29:58.120
<v Speaker 1>because the weather can eliminate half the field, and that's

0:29:58.840 --> 0:30:01.440
<v Speaker 1>what could happen here. I don't looking at the weather,

0:30:01.480 --> 0:30:04.400
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't look like that could happen, but you never know, Yeah,

0:30:04.840 --> 0:30:07.480
<v Speaker 1>that's something that could happen here. And I think that's

0:30:07.680 --> 0:30:10.280
<v Speaker 1>the it's kind of a mix between the players, but

0:30:10.440 --> 0:30:14.400
<v Speaker 1>with with those elements that you have to overcome, this

0:30:14.480 --> 0:30:17.360
<v Speaker 1>is a This is going to be a mentally exhausting

0:30:17.760 --> 0:30:20.840
<v Speaker 1>tournament for players, Like you get off the golf course,

0:30:20.880 --> 0:30:23.800
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna feel like you just played thirty six holes,

0:30:23.840 --> 0:30:27.560
<v Speaker 1>not eighteen yeah for sure. Now for a quick word

0:30:27.600 --> 0:30:31.320
<v Speaker 1>from our sponsor, Smathers and Branson. You know, one of

0:30:31.400 --> 0:30:34.680
<v Speaker 1>my favorite things about Smathers and Branson is that it's

0:30:34.800 --> 0:30:39.479
<v Speaker 1>just one of those entrepreneurial stories. So two best friends,

0:30:39.480 --> 0:30:43.920
<v Speaker 1>Peter and Austin, decided to start making, you know, needle

0:30:43.960 --> 0:30:50.240
<v Speaker 1>point belts, and their girlfriends actually made them both needle

0:30:50.280 --> 0:30:53.000
<v Speaker 1>point belts as a gift, and that's kind of how

0:30:53.240 --> 0:30:56.920
<v Speaker 1>the whole story started. You know, they just started making

0:30:57.080 --> 0:31:00.320
<v Speaker 1>needle point belts, and you know, now they've got this

0:31:00.520 --> 0:31:04.320
<v Speaker 1>big company and probably the leaders in the needle point industry. So,

0:31:04.920 --> 0:31:08.080
<v Speaker 1>like we talked about at the outset, they're a partner

0:31:08.120 --> 0:31:11.600
<v Speaker 1>and they're offering fifteen percent off your entire order, so

0:31:11.640 --> 0:31:13.960
<v Speaker 1>that can be a pretty significant amount when you added

0:31:14.080 --> 0:31:17.280
<v Speaker 1>up plus free shipping with the promo code Frida Egg.

0:31:17.920 --> 0:31:21.040
<v Speaker 1>Go to their website. They I got the Grateful Dead belt,

0:31:21.120 --> 0:31:23.719
<v Speaker 1>they got you know, other musicians, they got Rolling Stones,

0:31:23.760 --> 0:31:27.200
<v Speaker 1>Pink Floyd, They've got all the colleges, Arnold, Palmer Jack, Nicholas,

0:31:27.200 --> 0:31:31.600
<v Speaker 1>Golden Bear. Selection there. I was shocked. I hadn't ever

0:31:31.640 --> 0:31:33.560
<v Speaker 1>been to their website, had just seen them in pro shops.

0:31:33.640 --> 0:31:35.920
<v Speaker 1>I was shocked. At how many things they had to

0:31:36.000 --> 0:31:39.720
<v Speaker 1>choose from. So use the promo code Frida Egg at

0:31:39.720 --> 0:31:42.640
<v Speaker 1>Smathers and Branson dot com and get fifteen percent off.

0:31:43.520 --> 0:31:44.720
<v Speaker 1>Now back to Kyle Porter.

0:31:46.600 --> 0:31:51.600
<v Speaker 2>Okay, my number four knees whose knees are going to

0:31:51.640 --> 0:31:59.840
<v Speaker 2>hold up knees? Knees? Brooksy, Oh bad knee gimping around DJ.

0:32:00.400 --> 0:32:02.360
<v Speaker 2>I don't know what's going on with his knee. I

0:32:02.360 --> 0:32:04.240
<v Speaker 2>think he just didn't want to play Byron Nelson.

0:32:04.680 --> 0:32:07.280
<v Speaker 1>I think he probably looked at the weather. It's like

0:32:07.440 --> 0:32:08.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to go.

0:32:08.320 --> 0:32:13.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm good. Uh but but yeah, those are two

0:32:13.320 --> 0:32:15.600
<v Speaker 2>guys that are in that group of six. I mean

0:32:16.160 --> 0:32:19.720
<v Speaker 2>DJ has been beaten by two players in the last

0:32:19.800 --> 0:32:22.920
<v Speaker 2>two PGAs. So you got to be by by Colin

0:32:22.920 --> 0:32:25.960
<v Speaker 2>Markabbo last year and he got beat by Brooksy the

0:32:26.040 --> 0:32:26.720
<v Speaker 2>year before that.

0:32:26.720 --> 0:32:30.160
<v Speaker 1>That's it, I mean his did Brooksy? Did Brooksy beat him?

0:32:30.240 --> 0:32:33.960
<v Speaker 1>Or did Austin beat him with that overclub like.

0:32:33.920 --> 0:32:40.760
<v Speaker 2>A phill at Marion situation? Uh yeah, that's a good point.

0:32:41.000 --> 0:32:45.680
<v Speaker 2>So I don't know. I think I think Brooks this

0:32:45.680 --> 0:32:48.960
<v Speaker 2>this should be a Brooks week, But I have no

0:32:49.000 --> 0:32:51.680
<v Speaker 2>confidence in it because he can't He can't even squat

0:32:51.760 --> 0:32:54.120
<v Speaker 2>down to read a putt. I think he I think

0:32:54.120 --> 0:32:56.760
<v Speaker 2>he'll make the cut because his ball striking is so

0:32:56.880 --> 0:33:00.280
<v Speaker 2>good that it'll just it'll be he'll, he'll he'll be

0:33:00.320 --> 0:33:03.040
<v Speaker 2>able to ride that into a made cut. But I

0:33:03.160 --> 0:33:05.400
<v Speaker 2>just have no confidence. I don't really have any confidence

0:33:05.440 --> 0:33:09.120
<v Speaker 2>in either of them winning this golf tournament. So I'm

0:33:09.160 --> 0:33:13.040
<v Speaker 2>interested to see just kind of you know, I'm kind

0:33:13.040 --> 0:33:15.480
<v Speaker 2>of using the injury as a little bit of a

0:33:15.480 --> 0:33:18.400
<v Speaker 2>trojan horse to talk about those two guys, But I

0:33:18.440 --> 0:33:20.080
<v Speaker 2>think that's a storyline going into the week.

0:33:20.920 --> 0:33:25.120
<v Speaker 1>It's so it's just amazing how golf changes, right like,

0:33:25.160 --> 0:33:28.000
<v Speaker 1>and how quickly it changes, because yeah, think about it

0:33:28.000 --> 0:33:32.080
<v Speaker 1>in November at the end of that Masters in November,

0:33:32.200 --> 0:33:35.400
<v Speaker 1>ever thinking that DJ might not be in the your

0:33:35.440 --> 0:33:38.120
<v Speaker 1>top five favorites for this week, and yeah, like here

0:33:38.160 --> 0:33:41.160
<v Speaker 1>we are, Like he's on the fringe of the top

0:33:41.200 --> 0:33:44.520
<v Speaker 1>five favorite and it's just you know, he can. He

0:33:44.560 --> 0:33:46.440
<v Speaker 1>makes it look so easy. And I think that's the

0:33:46.480 --> 0:33:50.800
<v Speaker 1>thing too with Brooks is this golf course. When you

0:33:50.840 --> 0:33:53.160
<v Speaker 1>were just talking, it kind of reminds me a little

0:33:53.160 --> 0:33:55.840
<v Speaker 1>bit of Aaron Hills off the tee and the fact

0:33:55.920 --> 0:34:00.120
<v Speaker 1>that like there's plenty of space to hit the ball,

0:34:00.600 --> 0:34:04.440
<v Speaker 1>but when you get outside the space, the ball's gone. Yeah,

0:34:04.480 --> 0:34:07.400
<v Speaker 1>And we saw that at Aaron Hills, where like there's

0:34:07.440 --> 0:34:09.799
<v Speaker 1>plenty of places to keep it in play, but the

0:34:09.840 --> 0:34:14.000
<v Speaker 1>second you get off that in play, they're big numbers everywhere.

0:34:14.040 --> 0:34:16.919
<v Speaker 1>And we saw I think DJ missed the cut that year.

0:34:17.280 --> 0:34:18.040
<v Speaker 2>I think that's right.

0:34:18.120 --> 0:34:21.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and then you know, Jason Day missed the cut.

0:34:21.120 --> 0:34:23.520
<v Speaker 1>There were a lot of big names. Rory might have

0:34:23.560 --> 0:34:24.080
<v Speaker 1>missed the cut.

0:34:24.160 --> 0:34:26.480
<v Speaker 2>Rory missed the cut, yeah.

0:34:25.800 --> 0:34:28.440
<v Speaker 1>But that that's the type of golf course. And if

0:34:28.480 --> 0:34:30.680
<v Speaker 1>those guys are driving the ball, well, it just has

0:34:30.719 --> 0:34:33.600
<v Speaker 1>a bummer with with Brooksy and the knee, you know,

0:34:34.400 --> 0:34:37.160
<v Speaker 1>I feel like we're missing out on like some really

0:34:37.239 --> 0:34:39.640
<v Speaker 1>prime years of his golf because of this knee, Like

0:34:39.840 --> 0:34:42.760
<v Speaker 1>just for the last you know, five six majors.

0:34:42.960 --> 0:34:47.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and I don't know his his whole stick whenever

0:34:47.600 --> 0:34:49.839
<v Speaker 2>he was number one in the world and winning all

0:34:49.880 --> 0:34:52.759
<v Speaker 2>the time. At the time, it was like, Okay, this

0:34:52.800 --> 0:34:56.600
<v Speaker 2>is fun and cool and funny and there's like, you know,

0:34:56.680 --> 0:35:00.280
<v Speaker 2>kind of a levity to it. But at the same time,

0:35:00.360 --> 0:35:02.600
<v Speaker 2>during that time period, I was I was thinking like

0:35:02.840 --> 0:35:05.359
<v Speaker 2>what about when this goes the other way, like it's

0:35:05.360 --> 0:35:07.120
<v Speaker 2>not gonna be that funny anymore. It's going to be

0:35:07.200 --> 0:35:12.000
<v Speaker 2>kind of like annoying or just grating a little bit.

0:35:12.080 --> 0:35:13.960
<v Speaker 2>And that's kind of what it's turned into, like his

0:35:14.080 --> 0:35:17.120
<v Speaker 2>whole like I don't care about golf, but I'm also

0:35:17.160 --> 0:35:19.080
<v Speaker 2>the best player in the world. I don't know. I

0:35:19.480 --> 0:35:22.400
<v Speaker 2>just I have not enjoyed the last year and a

0:35:22.440 --> 0:35:25.160
<v Speaker 2>half of kind of the Brooks stick because you never

0:35:25.200 --> 0:35:28.040
<v Speaker 2>know when he's healthy, you never know when he's injured.

0:35:28.320 --> 0:35:31.680
<v Speaker 2>He's just I don't know. I just as a as

0:35:31.680 --> 0:35:34.120
<v Speaker 2>a consumer of golf, it has not been enjoyable.

0:35:36.040 --> 0:35:38.440
<v Speaker 1>Brash works really well when you're playing really.

0:35:38.200 --> 0:35:40.000
<v Speaker 2>Well, when you're the number one player in the world.

0:35:41.560 --> 0:35:43.960
<v Speaker 1>But as we've seen, you know, and this was the

0:35:44.040 --> 0:35:47.040
<v Speaker 1>thing is like over and over again, and it just

0:35:47.080 --> 0:35:51.280
<v Speaker 1>shows how much Tiger spoiled us, because like the holding

0:35:51.320 --> 0:35:54.240
<v Speaker 1>on to that top spot is so such a fragile

0:35:54.280 --> 0:35:57.319
<v Speaker 1>thing like it and it's fleeting like it. You know,

0:35:57.840 --> 0:36:00.680
<v Speaker 1>DJ is still number one in the world, but you know,

0:36:00.800 --> 0:36:04.000
<v Speaker 1>not by the margin he was six months ago. And

0:36:04.160 --> 0:36:06.120
<v Speaker 1>it seems like that might come to an end in

0:36:06.560 --> 0:36:07.400
<v Speaker 1>the near future.

0:36:07.680 --> 0:36:10.279
<v Speaker 2>Who is who is your number one? Who's the number one?

0:36:10.320 --> 0:36:13.800
<v Speaker 2>Player in the world in your mind right now, it's hard.

0:36:14.000 --> 0:36:16.479
<v Speaker 1>See, this is where I think it's just that's what's

0:36:16.600 --> 0:36:20.279
<v Speaker 1>leading into this wide open thing. I think if I

0:36:20.280 --> 0:36:22.879
<v Speaker 1>if I was gonna have to pick one player, I'd

0:36:22.920 --> 0:36:25.359
<v Speaker 1>probably pick Justin Thomas right now.

0:36:25.640 --> 0:36:31.080
<v Speaker 2>What about you? I think it's Speed, which sounds just insane.

0:36:31.840 --> 0:36:32.680
<v Speaker 1>It is insane.

0:36:33.200 --> 0:36:35.760
<v Speaker 2>I mean it would have sounded like like a crazy

0:36:35.800 --> 0:36:41.279
<v Speaker 2>person three months ago. But his numbers, the consistency that

0:36:41.360 --> 0:36:43.680
<v Speaker 2>he's shown over the last and and if you pull

0:36:43.800 --> 0:36:46.600
<v Speaker 2>back that time frame past three months, you can't say Speed.

0:36:46.719 --> 0:36:48.920
<v Speaker 2>I think it's it's j t Or or it might

0:36:48.960 --> 0:36:51.160
<v Speaker 2>be Bryson for me if you pull it back past

0:36:51.200 --> 0:36:54.439
<v Speaker 2>three months. But yeah, I think if you look to two, three,

0:36:54.480 --> 0:36:56.040
<v Speaker 2>four months, it's probably Jordan Speed.

0:36:56.400 --> 0:37:00.200
<v Speaker 1>It's crazy. He's so good again, it's just it's amazing. See,

0:37:00.239 --> 0:37:03.120
<v Speaker 1>it's great for golf to have him back. Yeah, I

0:37:03.120 --> 0:37:07.920
<v Speaker 1>think he's Legitimately. I'm in this major draft thing and

0:37:07.960 --> 0:37:10.799
<v Speaker 1>with a bunch of buddies and you pick, you get

0:37:10.840 --> 0:37:13.520
<v Speaker 1>like a random order, and you pick, you get you know,

0:37:13.560 --> 0:37:15.680
<v Speaker 1>it's a draft order. And I got the first pick

0:37:15.920 --> 0:37:18.360
<v Speaker 1>and it was I had I was picking between Rory

0:37:18.360 --> 0:37:23.879
<v Speaker 1>and Speeth. I picked Rory. I'm probably gonna Yeah, I'm

0:37:23.880 --> 0:37:26.279
<v Speaker 1>not happy yet. I don't know why I picked him.

0:37:26.360 --> 0:37:28.680
<v Speaker 1>He's gonna shoot seventy five. This is this is one

0:37:28.719 --> 0:37:31.840
<v Speaker 1>of my things. Can Rory get off the good start?

0:37:32.880 --> 0:37:35.319
<v Speaker 1>He does needs to not shoot seventy four in the

0:37:35.360 --> 0:37:36.120
<v Speaker 1>first round.

0:37:36.520 --> 0:37:38.759
<v Speaker 2>So I wrote about this. I wrote about this for

0:37:38.880 --> 0:37:43.080
<v Speaker 2>cbsports dot com on whatever to whatever today is Tuesday.

0:37:44.080 --> 0:37:47.120
<v Speaker 2>He like people, there's gonna be a through line this

0:37:47.160 --> 0:37:49.600
<v Speaker 2>week where people are like, oh, twenty twelve, Oh just

0:37:49.640 --> 0:37:54.920
<v Speaker 2>one Wells Fargo. And that's true, and that's fine, but

0:37:55.120 --> 0:37:57.439
<v Speaker 2>like I mean, think about the seasons that he had

0:37:57.680 --> 0:38:00.839
<v Speaker 2>that he has had from twenty fourteen to twenty twenty one,

0:38:01.440 --> 0:38:05.400
<v Speaker 2>and how few, like what are his major even opportunities

0:38:05.440 --> 0:38:07.600
<v Speaker 2>to win in that in that period of time?

0:38:08.080 --> 0:38:08.480
<v Speaker 1>Nothing?

0:38:08.680 --> 0:38:10.600
<v Speaker 2>Eighteen Masters? Is that it?

0:38:11.280 --> 0:38:14.359
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's it. It's it's crazy and he has all

0:38:14.400 --> 0:38:17.520
<v Speaker 1>these high finishes, but it's all because he can't he

0:38:17.560 --> 0:38:19.000
<v Speaker 1>can't get off to a good start.

0:38:19.280 --> 0:38:22.080
<v Speaker 2>And it makes me feel like it's something.

0:38:22.440 --> 0:38:25.799
<v Speaker 1>Yes, there's such an importance, and we've seen it with

0:38:25.840 --> 0:38:29.040
<v Speaker 1>the press conferences, like how he talks about, oh, it's

0:38:29.160 --> 0:38:35.120
<v Speaker 1>just another week. Oh I'm juggling. Oh you know, like

0:38:35.200 --> 0:38:38.840
<v Speaker 1>this everything revolves around this week. You can tell that

0:38:38.920 --> 0:38:41.440
<v Speaker 1>he's trying to change is the way he preps for

0:38:41.520 --> 0:38:44.360
<v Speaker 1>these majors because he knows something's off.

0:38:44.880 --> 0:38:46.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, the juggler, I forgot about that.

0:38:47.280 --> 0:38:51.319
<v Speaker 1>Uh it is the best one, the juggling, and it's

0:38:51.360 --> 0:38:51.959
<v Speaker 1>gotta be it.

0:38:51.960 --> 0:38:55.080
<v Speaker 2>It's got to be infuriating for him because it's infuriating

0:38:55.120 --> 0:38:58.600
<v Speaker 2>for us to watch and for him to know, Like, hey,

0:38:58.719 --> 0:39:02.400
<v Speaker 2>I'm I had the third best strokes gain season of

0:39:02.440 --> 0:39:06.239
<v Speaker 2>all time in twenty nineteen, and I was just a

0:39:06.320 --> 0:39:08.759
<v Speaker 2>no show, not a no show, but like I was

0:39:08.800 --> 0:39:11.319
<v Speaker 2>not really in contention to win any of the four

0:39:11.360 --> 0:39:15.719
<v Speaker 2>tournaments that really matter, right, And that's that is emblematic

0:39:15.760 --> 0:39:18.880
<v Speaker 2>of what the last seven years have been. And so

0:39:19.480 --> 0:39:21.760
<v Speaker 2>I think people are gonna get worked up about Kiowa

0:39:22.000 --> 0:39:25.640
<v Speaker 2>and qual Hollow and oh this is it, and maybe

0:39:25.680 --> 0:39:30.560
<v Speaker 2>it is, but I just the evidence, we have seven

0:39:30.640 --> 0:39:34.759
<v Speaker 2>years of evidence that just points to like he's got

0:39:34.840 --> 0:39:38.080
<v Speaker 2>some sort of mental even if it's tiny, it's some

0:39:38.120 --> 0:39:41.800
<v Speaker 2>sort of hanging up at these majors. And that's a bummer.

0:39:41.840 --> 0:39:43.239
<v Speaker 2>Like I want him to win his fifth I want

0:39:43.320 --> 0:39:47.200
<v Speaker 2>him to win six, seven, eight, but I don't know.

0:39:47.600 --> 0:39:50.359
<v Speaker 2>It's just not at least he hasn't proven it over

0:39:50.360 --> 0:39:53.920
<v Speaker 2>the last few years that he's in the right spot

0:39:54.000 --> 0:39:55.279
<v Speaker 2>mentally to be able to do so.

0:39:56.320 --> 0:39:59.120
<v Speaker 1>And it's crazy that we're doing this. He's got twelve

0:39:59.239 --> 0:40:04.680
<v Speaker 1>top tads that time frame, I know, but they're top.

0:40:04.680 --> 0:40:09.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, they're there. It's it's empty calories.

0:40:09.840 --> 0:40:12.120
<v Speaker 1>You well, I just want them. I want him to win,

0:40:12.440 --> 0:40:14.839
<v Speaker 1>get back on on the because that's the thing is

0:40:14.880 --> 0:40:16.920
<v Speaker 1>like he's still he's still.

0:40:16.760 --> 0:40:21.000
<v Speaker 2>Only like what thirty one, thirty just turned thirty two. Yeah,

0:40:21.440 --> 0:40:25.560
<v Speaker 2>by the way, I think KOA was his best major.

0:40:25.960 --> 0:40:29.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it gets lost because he was all out of assault.

0:40:29.760 --> 0:40:31.759
<v Speaker 1>But how hard it was, even though it was in

0:40:31.800 --> 0:40:36.160
<v Speaker 1>the most docile conditions. Yeah, he lapped the field and

0:40:36.239 --> 0:40:38.799
<v Speaker 1>it covers up that, like only a few guys were

0:40:38.880 --> 0:40:42.360
<v Speaker 1>under parts A par seventy two. That's the thing too, yes,

0:40:42.400 --> 0:40:45.799
<v Speaker 1>par seventy two, and the scores I anticipate this year,

0:40:45.920 --> 0:40:48.759
<v Speaker 1>like scoring is gonna be below ten, is going to

0:40:48.840 --> 0:40:53.000
<v Speaker 1>win you know, probably on a on a par seventy two.

0:40:53.520 --> 0:40:58.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, well part of the social construct. Uh you

0:40:58.480 --> 0:41:01.680
<v Speaker 2>want my fifth one? Yeah, okay, so my fifth one

0:41:01.920 --> 0:41:07.239
<v Speaker 2>is can Colin Marikawa repeat. And the reason I want

0:41:07.280 --> 0:41:10.480
<v Speaker 2>to talk about him is because I think he has

0:41:10.560 --> 0:41:13.840
<v Speaker 2>the most to gain in terms of the changing the

0:41:13.880 --> 0:41:17.560
<v Speaker 2>way we think about a player this week. So what

0:41:17.600 --> 0:41:20.520
<v Speaker 2>I mean by that is, if Rory wins, it's great,

0:41:20.560 --> 0:41:23.560
<v Speaker 2>but it doesn't really change a ton about the way

0:41:23.600 --> 0:41:28.319
<v Speaker 2>that I think about him. If Xander wins, okay, like,

0:41:28.400 --> 0:41:31.520
<v Speaker 2>it doesn't change a ton about the I always thought

0:41:31.520 --> 0:41:33.920
<v Speaker 2>he was probably gonna win a major, maybe two, something

0:41:34.000 --> 0:41:37.640
<v Speaker 2>like that. But I think Marikawa, if he wins, and

0:41:37.719 --> 0:41:40.480
<v Speaker 2>that would be five wins in his first like forty

0:41:40.480 --> 0:41:44.239
<v Speaker 2>five starts, including two majors, all of a sudden, I

0:41:44.239 --> 0:41:46.520
<v Speaker 2>think that changes the way that I think about him

0:41:46.560 --> 0:41:49.360
<v Speaker 2>to where it's like, wait a second, is this a

0:41:49.480 --> 0:41:54.919
<v Speaker 2>Rory Speith level of talent? Because I don't quite think

0:41:54.920 --> 0:41:57.040
<v Speaker 2>of him like that right now, and maybe I should,

0:41:57.160 --> 0:41:59.319
<v Speaker 2>but I don't, And so I think he has the

0:41:59.360 --> 0:42:02.120
<v Speaker 2>most to gain with a win this week.

0:42:02.920 --> 0:42:05.759
<v Speaker 1>I think, Yeah, I think I'd throw Rom in there too.

0:42:06.080 --> 0:42:10.279
<v Speaker 1>If you look at the win percentage of Rom and Morikawa,

0:42:10.320 --> 0:42:13.640
<v Speaker 1>and if you include European Tour wins for Rom, because

0:42:13.760 --> 0:42:16.600
<v Speaker 1>he's won a lot of Rolex events, you know they

0:42:16.640 --> 0:42:19.040
<v Speaker 1>haven't been like the a lot of puff, you know,

0:42:19.760 --> 0:42:21.840
<v Speaker 1>little tiny events like that, they've been at least the

0:42:21.840 --> 0:42:24.399
<v Speaker 1>big ones, Like if you throw those in their their

0:42:24.520 --> 0:42:28.840
<v Speaker 1>win percentages are the ones that stack up with the

0:42:28.880 --> 0:42:31.560
<v Speaker 1>pills and the ernies. They aren't Tiger. Nobody's going to

0:42:31.600 --> 0:42:35.040
<v Speaker 1>get to Tiger level win percentage, but those are guys

0:42:35.560 --> 0:42:39.080
<v Speaker 1>that early in their career look like they could be that.

0:42:39.440 --> 0:42:41.719
<v Speaker 1>You know, they win ten percent of the time they're

0:42:41.760 --> 0:42:44.239
<v Speaker 1>in a field maybe yeah, you know, eight eight to

0:42:44.360 --> 0:42:47.880
<v Speaker 1>ten percent, which is really really freaking good. So I

0:42:47.920 --> 0:42:51.720
<v Speaker 1>would say I throw Rom in that bucket too. With

0:42:51.719 --> 0:42:56.480
<v Speaker 1>with Morikawa in terms of a win here would Rom

0:42:56.640 --> 0:42:59.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of like sneaky. He's starting to get a lot

0:43:00.120 --> 0:43:02.200
<v Speaker 1>of major starts. I know there aren't a lot of

0:43:02.200 --> 0:43:06.040
<v Speaker 1>majors every every year, but you know it's for a

0:43:06.080 --> 0:43:08.879
<v Speaker 1>player of his level. With the wins he's had, I think,

0:43:09.160 --> 0:43:11.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, the clock's gonna kind of start to tick

0:43:11.600 --> 0:43:12.480
<v Speaker 1>on John Ram.

0:43:12.800 --> 0:43:15.000
<v Speaker 2>And I think that's fair. I think he would say

0:43:15.000 --> 0:43:17.440
<v Speaker 2>that's fair because he again, he's somebody you look at

0:43:17.480 --> 0:43:20.120
<v Speaker 2>his top tens like I remember a Will Gray tweet

0:43:20.160 --> 0:43:23.520
<v Speaker 2>from Pebble in twenty nineteen and he was like this

0:43:23.520 --> 0:43:25.560
<v Speaker 2>this t three I think he finished T three from

0:43:25.640 --> 0:43:27.759
<v Speaker 2>Rom is going to look a lot better on Wikipedia

0:43:27.800 --> 0:43:30.479
<v Speaker 2>than it did in real life. And it's like, yeah,

0:43:30.560 --> 0:43:34.480
<v Speaker 2>I don't I don't even remember him. He wasn't in contention.

0:43:34.760 --> 0:43:37.480
<v Speaker 2>And that's the thing. It's like, when has Rom really

0:43:37.520 --> 0:43:40.920
<v Speaker 2>been in contention at a major championship. I don't even

0:43:40.920 --> 0:43:43.279
<v Speaker 2>know if he has been. Maybe maybe a Master's one

0:43:43.360 --> 0:43:45.560
<v Speaker 2>year kind of. I don't know if you have to

0:43:45.560 --> 0:43:47.799
<v Speaker 2>start winning majors, but you at least have to start

0:43:47.800 --> 0:43:48.560
<v Speaker 2>contending for.

0:43:48.560 --> 0:43:51.879
<v Speaker 1>Some What if Tony Fina wins, would he fall into

0:43:51.880 --> 0:43:55.200
<v Speaker 1>the bucket of most perception change? I mean, I guess

0:43:55.200 --> 0:43:56.160
<v Speaker 1>perception change.

0:43:56.440 --> 0:43:59.080
<v Speaker 2>Maybe it would. It would almost be so shocking we

0:43:59.080 --> 0:44:00.799
<v Speaker 2>wouldn't even know how to comprehended.

0:44:01.520 --> 0:44:04.120
<v Speaker 1>He played great at the last PGA. That was like,

0:44:04.560 --> 0:44:07.120
<v Speaker 1>this is the thing. He played really well, he executed

0:44:07.160 --> 0:44:10.120
<v Speaker 1>the shots, he made putts at the at Harding Park,

0:44:10.280 --> 0:44:12.240
<v Speaker 1>and Kyl Morikawa just beat him.

0:44:12.560 --> 0:44:15.160
<v Speaker 2>Sometimes I feel like with him and Xander and guys

0:44:15.200 --> 0:44:17.680
<v Speaker 2>talk about how uncomfortable it is to be in or

0:44:17.680 --> 0:44:20.560
<v Speaker 2>near the lead. Sometimes they'll get near the lead and

0:44:20.640 --> 0:44:23.520
<v Speaker 2>there's hit, like a really bad shot, like even Xander

0:44:23.560 --> 0:44:26.879
<v Speaker 2>on sixteen and Augusta. You're like, man, that is that's

0:44:26.920 --> 0:44:30.120
<v Speaker 2>not even close, And so I do want that. I

0:44:30.160 --> 0:44:32.960
<v Speaker 2>wonder if there's like a mental thing there. But I

0:44:33.040 --> 0:44:35.960
<v Speaker 2>think generally we overrate that storyline of like, oh, he

0:44:35.960 --> 0:44:38.440
<v Speaker 2>can't get it done. I think so much of it

0:44:38.600 --> 0:44:41.840
<v Speaker 2>ninety percent of it is luck and situational and that

0:44:41.920 --> 0:44:43.120
<v Speaker 2>it'll eventually happened.

0:44:43.440 --> 0:44:48.400
<v Speaker 1>My fifth thing was kind of piggybacking off of Morikala.

0:44:48.520 --> 0:44:52.719
<v Speaker 1>So this was a big breakthrough for Morikala last year. Obviously,

0:44:52.800 --> 0:44:56.359
<v Speaker 1>he he's won a bunch, but winning a major that

0:44:56.480 --> 0:44:59.239
<v Speaker 1>young in a career is a huge deal. And I

0:44:59.320 --> 0:45:02.719
<v Speaker 1>kind of I circled some some other guys. Unfortunately, your

0:45:02.760 --> 0:45:06.080
<v Speaker 1>boy Matt Wolfe is not on this list, not here,

0:45:06.280 --> 0:45:09.680
<v Speaker 1>and that's that you think about last year's PGA and

0:45:09.880 --> 0:45:14.400
<v Speaker 1>to this year and how much things can change. But Scotti, Scheffler,

0:45:14.840 --> 0:45:19.200
<v Speaker 1>holand Haveland. This is great venue for Haveland, especially now

0:45:19.200 --> 0:45:23.920
<v Speaker 1>that he can Chip. Joaquin Neeman, sun dam xel Taurus.

0:45:24.800 --> 0:45:26.399
<v Speaker 1>You know, there's a bunch of other names you could

0:45:26.400 --> 0:45:29.560
<v Speaker 1>put in here, but all these guys I think would

0:45:29.600 --> 0:45:32.480
<v Speaker 1>fall into the bucket of like all of a sudden becoming,

0:45:32.960 --> 0:45:36.879
<v Speaker 1>you know, potential superstars with a major Oh Sam Burns too.

0:45:37.520 --> 0:45:40.680
<v Speaker 2>I love Zala Taurus this week, and maybe that's heat

0:45:40.719 --> 0:45:42.879
<v Speaker 2>of the moment, like I'm just reacting to the way

0:45:42.920 --> 0:45:44.920
<v Speaker 2>he's played over the last couple of months, But I

0:45:45.040 --> 0:45:47.160
<v Speaker 2>just I love the way he hits the ball, and

0:45:48.280 --> 0:45:50.160
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, maybe he doesn't keep it him play

0:45:50.280 --> 0:45:52.880
<v Speaker 2>enough off the tee to really contend here, but his

0:45:52.960 --> 0:45:55.600
<v Speaker 2>iron play is a joke. It's so so good.

0:45:56.360 --> 0:46:00.480
<v Speaker 1>Xell Turus and Morikawa are really really similar, or when

0:46:00.520 --> 0:46:03.480
<v Speaker 1>you start to look into their games and how great

0:46:03.520 --> 0:46:06.640
<v Speaker 1>of iron players they are. They are both top five

0:46:07.000 --> 0:46:09.120
<v Speaker 1>on tour right now iron players.

0:46:09.400 --> 0:46:13.239
<v Speaker 2>And I think what's so interesting about them is they

0:46:13.280 --> 0:46:15.279
<v Speaker 2>both stayed in college. Correct me if I'm wrong. I

0:46:15.280 --> 0:46:16.840
<v Speaker 2>think they both stayed all four years.

0:46:17.480 --> 0:46:20.399
<v Speaker 1>Zelle tourist left with a semester to go.

0:46:20.520 --> 0:46:24.040
<v Speaker 2>I think, okay, so close to it. But there's an

0:46:24.120 --> 0:46:28.520
<v Speaker 2>interesting more Kawa interview or conversation on Golf Digest right

0:46:28.560 --> 0:46:32.799
<v Speaker 2>now where he talks about how he actually he purposefully

0:46:32.840 --> 0:46:35.640
<v Speaker 2>stayed in college to kind of prep for the PGA Tour,

0:46:36.239 --> 0:46:39.560
<v Speaker 2>like almost as a in lieu of playing the corn

0:46:39.600 --> 0:46:41.840
<v Speaker 2>Ferry Tour, which is not how he said it. But

0:46:41.880 --> 0:46:44.799
<v Speaker 2>it's kind of how it came across. And I thought

0:46:44.800 --> 0:46:48.479
<v Speaker 2>that was really really interesting because most of the time

0:46:48.560 --> 0:46:51.000
<v Speaker 2>we think about guys that are that good from Teita

0:46:51.080 --> 0:46:53.640
<v Speaker 2>Green is coming out after a year or two years,

0:46:53.680 --> 0:46:56.719
<v Speaker 2>somebody like a JT. But those guys stayed almost the

0:46:56.840 --> 0:47:01.200
<v Speaker 2>entire time, which I think is interesting in like in

0:47:01.280 --> 0:47:02.840
<v Speaker 2>terms of how we view amateur golf.

0:47:03.600 --> 0:47:06.279
<v Speaker 1>Well, I mean, like think about Maricow he finished, he

0:47:06.320 --> 0:47:09.120
<v Speaker 1>finished runner up, he lost it a playoff at a

0:47:09.160 --> 0:47:13.160
<v Speaker 1>web event as a freshman after his freshman year, Like,

0:47:13.200 --> 0:47:15.160
<v Speaker 1>how many kids would go back to school for three

0:47:15.200 --> 0:47:16.080
<v Speaker 1>more years after that.

0:47:16.480 --> 0:47:17.000
<v Speaker 2>I wouldn't.

0:47:17.280 --> 0:47:21.080
<v Speaker 1>No, I wouldn't either. I don't. Yeah, they're definitely it

0:47:21.440 --> 0:47:25.040
<v Speaker 1>gives them a maturity. Yeah, for sure, you could go

0:47:25.120 --> 0:47:28.239
<v Speaker 1>both ways, right because like Speith and JT didn't do that.

0:47:29.160 --> 0:47:32.359
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but you could argue that like Speith, I mean,

0:47:32.360 --> 0:47:34.400
<v Speaker 2>if he didn't hit the stick at the John Deere,

0:47:35.040 --> 0:47:37.800
<v Speaker 2>maybe he' didn't like maybe none of this happens, which

0:47:37.840 --> 0:47:42.160
<v Speaker 2>is like that's a crazy thing to say. But if

0:47:42.200 --> 0:47:45.560
<v Speaker 2>you're that good, if you're Xalatorus or Morikawa good, I

0:47:45.560 --> 0:47:48.120
<v Speaker 2>don't think it is like hurting you necessarily to stay

0:47:48.120 --> 0:47:50.920
<v Speaker 2>in college. Because those guys were already working on things

0:47:50.960 --> 0:47:53.319
<v Speaker 2>that they needed to do to become great pros. It's

0:47:53.400 --> 0:47:56.960
<v Speaker 2>different if like they're just in it, they're already in

0:47:57.000 --> 0:47:59.399
<v Speaker 2>a different class. So I don't know you could argue

0:47:59.400 --> 0:48:01.040
<v Speaker 2>it both ways, but I thought that I just thought

0:48:01.040 --> 0:48:03.120
<v Speaker 2>that was an interesting nugget for morcow.

0:48:03.719 --> 0:48:05.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, who's your pick?

0:48:06.239 --> 0:48:09.840
<v Speaker 2>I am? I am going back and forth between U

0:48:10.120 --> 0:48:14.960
<v Speaker 2>dB vibin and UH and speed. I don't I don't

0:48:14.960 --> 0:48:16.080
<v Speaker 2>know who to pull the trigger on.

0:48:16.560 --> 0:48:18.960
<v Speaker 1>That's a good dB vibe in course too.

0:48:19.320 --> 0:48:20.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, pretty much.

0:48:20.239 --> 0:48:22.920
<v Speaker 1>I'll like I could talk myself into anybody in the

0:48:22.960 --> 0:48:28.280
<v Speaker 1>top twenty. I could honestly talk myself into honest Abe.

0:48:29.640 --> 0:48:31.160
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if he hits it far. He's like

0:48:31.160 --> 0:48:34.880
<v Speaker 2>one hundred and seventieth in driving distance, but he's so good.

0:48:35.040 --> 0:48:36.320
<v Speaker 1>He's good at everything else.

0:48:36.880 --> 0:48:39.400
<v Speaker 2>I don't. I don't tell me this. How does somebody

0:48:39.480 --> 0:48:42.160
<v Speaker 2>like him contend at quail Hollow? Cause he's just so

0:48:42.640 --> 0:48:47.520
<v Speaker 2>freaking good. That's a great analysis.

0:48:46.840 --> 0:48:50.560
<v Speaker 1>There, but it's just he's good at everything else, like everybody,

0:48:50.640 --> 0:48:52.719
<v Speaker 1>every player, you know, when you think about it really

0:48:52.760 --> 0:48:56.399
<v Speaker 1>deep down, like every player has a deficiency right right now.

0:48:56.480 --> 0:48:58.960
<v Speaker 1>It makes it what if your deficiency is driving distance,

0:48:59.040 --> 0:49:01.840
<v Speaker 1>it makes it tougher because as you start every round behind.

0:49:03.040 --> 0:49:07.080
<v Speaker 1>But you go down the list like JT's deficiencies. Putter right, yep,

0:49:07.320 --> 0:49:11.360
<v Speaker 1>DJ I'd say probably the putter can be a little

0:49:11.400 --> 0:49:14.319
<v Speaker 1>dicey Rom. I don't know what if Rom has a

0:49:14.360 --> 0:49:18.239
<v Speaker 1>deficiency to be honest, you know, but you go down

0:49:18.239 --> 0:49:21.320
<v Speaker 1>the list that you know Bryson could get a little

0:49:21.400 --> 0:49:25.400
<v Speaker 1>squirrely off the tee and his short irons aren't great. Yeah,

0:49:25.640 --> 0:49:29.480
<v Speaker 1>more Kawa Putter Rory, I mean pick pick the day

0:49:29.480 --> 0:49:33.560
<v Speaker 1>of the week what you want. Rory's coming out, wedges

0:49:33.680 --> 0:49:34.120
<v Speaker 1>or putter.

0:49:34.440 --> 0:49:38.480
<v Speaker 2>Whenever you were describing like, uh, you gotta you gotta

0:49:38.520 --> 0:49:41.120
<v Speaker 2>hold wedges against like a cross woman, I was like,

0:49:41.440 --> 0:49:43.080
<v Speaker 2>Rory's Rory mind, that's the cut.

0:49:45.200 --> 0:49:49.279
<v Speaker 1>I mean he hits some of the worst shots of

0:49:49.320 --> 0:49:52.560
<v Speaker 1>a top ten player every like with the wedges. It's

0:49:53.200 --> 0:49:57.520
<v Speaker 1>it's jarring. It's jarring to see a top ten player

0:49:57.600 --> 0:50:00.560
<v Speaker 1>in the hunt hit a wedge ten ten yards over

0:50:00.560 --> 0:50:02.160
<v Speaker 1>the green, like that shouldn't happen.

0:50:02.360 --> 0:50:06.239
<v Speaker 2>That's not a hitting wedges from like let's say one

0:50:06.320 --> 0:50:11.520
<v Speaker 2>hundred to one forty. That's a you can learn that, right,

0:50:11.600 --> 0:50:13.920
<v Speaker 2>That's not like an elite skill.

0:50:14.880 --> 0:50:18.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. Well, it's just think about like your

0:50:18.520 --> 0:50:21.000
<v Speaker 1>your elite skill is the driver that gets you all

0:50:21.040 --> 0:50:23.719
<v Speaker 1>these wedges and then just not being all hit the wedges.

0:50:24.000 --> 0:50:27.000
<v Speaker 2>Maybe you should just play up, like play back, just

0:50:27.080 --> 0:50:28.239
<v Speaker 2>hit five irons in.

0:50:28.760 --> 0:50:31.560
<v Speaker 1>The other thing about Rory is like the equipment stuff.

0:50:31.600 --> 0:50:35.080
<v Speaker 1>Like so I had heard that he was when he

0:50:35.120 --> 0:50:37.399
<v Speaker 1>switched to tailor made, he was having to get new

0:50:37.440 --> 0:50:40.480
<v Speaker 1>wedges for every round because he couldn't get the spin

0:50:40.800 --> 0:50:44.799
<v Speaker 1>on the ball that he wanted, you know, years ago. Yeah,

0:50:44.840 --> 0:50:48.160
<v Speaker 1>and then now we're talking the other day's talking about

0:50:48.200 --> 0:50:51.160
<v Speaker 1>he can't drive draw the ball because of the driver.

0:50:51.880 --> 0:50:54.560
<v Speaker 1>It's like, what get the guy some clubs that he

0:50:54.600 --> 0:50:59.640
<v Speaker 1>can play.

0:51:00.040 --> 0:51:05.040
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I thought they said he didn't. I thought

0:51:05.000 --> 0:51:06.560
<v Speaker 2>you said he didn't want to draw the ball.

0:51:07.800 --> 0:51:10.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I know, but like he just like said he

0:51:10.280 --> 0:51:13.160
<v Speaker 1>can't draw the ball. He tries to hit that push

0:51:13.280 --> 0:51:16.200
<v Speaker 1>draw and it just he drew it on eighteen at

0:51:17.440 --> 0:51:21.840
<v Speaker 1>maybe been more than a draw. But but this is

0:51:21.920 --> 0:51:26.040
<v Speaker 1>like an epidemic with with golfers, like notoriously, like Jack

0:51:26.400 --> 0:51:28.680
<v Speaker 1>played that golf ball that he made that for a

0:51:28.719 --> 0:51:30.959
<v Speaker 1>couple of years that was just like not a good

0:51:30.960 --> 0:51:34.279
<v Speaker 1>golf ball. Norman played bad equipment for a while, like

0:51:34.600 --> 0:51:37.480
<v Speaker 1>what what's with golfers? And like you get to the

0:51:37.520 --> 0:51:39.080
<v Speaker 1>top of the world and then all of a sudden

0:51:39.120 --> 0:51:42.759
<v Speaker 1>you have like your you self sabotage yourself with equipment decisions,

0:51:42.840 --> 0:51:45.319
<v Speaker 1>like because of money, Like guess what, You're gonna make

0:51:45.360 --> 0:51:48.080
<v Speaker 1>more money if you just win big tournaments, So get

0:51:48.120 --> 0:51:50.400
<v Speaker 1>equipment that you can win, Like that's what. One of

0:51:50.440 --> 0:51:52.520
<v Speaker 1>the things I think that was so underrated about Brooks's

0:51:52.600 --> 0:51:56.640
<v Speaker 1>run was no oem yeah, you know no. Like but

0:51:56.640 --> 0:51:59.399
<v Speaker 1>but like with Rory, like what why are we It's

0:51:59.440 --> 0:52:02.000
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty one. Why are we dealing with this? Like

0:52:02.080 --> 0:52:05.760
<v Speaker 1>what like get the guy, get the guy a driver

0:52:05.880 --> 0:52:07.959
<v Speaker 1>the can draw so you can hit his little push draw.

0:52:08.400 --> 0:52:14.000
<v Speaker 2>Give me three uh dream final pairings on Sunday. So

0:52:14.120 --> 0:52:15.840
<v Speaker 2>Rory Speith is probably one, right.

0:52:16.000 --> 0:52:26.759
<v Speaker 1>I mean Westy Rory Ernie's not in the field. Well,

0:52:26.760 --> 0:52:28.879
<v Speaker 1>it would be remiss to not get Hideki in one.

0:52:29.040 --> 0:52:31.120
<v Speaker 1>The one guy that can still win the Grand Slam

0:52:31.239 --> 0:52:40.320
<v Speaker 1>is as I would say, I think rom rom would

0:52:40.320 --> 0:52:43.440
<v Speaker 1>be one that I'd like to see. I mean it's

0:52:43.440 --> 0:52:47.719
<v Speaker 1>hard to I liked having I like having contrasts with styles, right, Yeah,

0:52:48.120 --> 0:52:51.000
<v Speaker 1>so I kind of like the old guy young guy

0:52:51.320 --> 0:52:54.480
<v Speaker 1>if you if you went with like a a rom

0:52:54.680 --> 0:52:59.920
<v Speaker 1>Rom Westy Rom Scott, you know, I think Morikawa defend

0:53:00.440 --> 0:53:01.399
<v Speaker 1>would be really neat.

0:53:01.560 --> 0:53:04.279
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I think Bryce and Ram would be great because

0:53:04.320 --> 0:53:08.680
<v Speaker 2>there'd be so much just angst and anxiety and frustration

0:53:09.040 --> 0:53:15.480
<v Speaker 2>and tension. Yeah, like Hatt and Ram, the you might, yeah,

0:53:15.520 --> 0:53:18.320
<v Speaker 2>just blow a gasket on the back nine.

0:53:18.560 --> 0:53:19.920
<v Speaker 1>What about hatton this week?

0:53:21.200 --> 0:53:23.839
<v Speaker 2>You know, he hadn't played well at Majors, He didn't

0:53:23.880 --> 0:53:27.080
<v Speaker 2>play well at Majors in twenty twenty, and then he

0:53:27.120 --> 0:53:29.399
<v Speaker 2>finished t eighteen at the Masters, And I think that

0:53:29.480 --> 0:53:32.799
<v Speaker 2>he is somebody who's I mean, his iron game is

0:53:32.880 --> 0:53:36.480
<v Speaker 2>so good, it's so so good, Like his approach plays

0:53:36.760 --> 0:53:40.560
<v Speaker 2>is excellent, and I think that, Yeah, I think I

0:53:40.680 --> 0:53:43.200
<v Speaker 2>worry about him a little bit when it when I

0:53:43.239 --> 0:53:47.600
<v Speaker 2>mentioned the words discipline and patience earlier and it comes

0:53:47.840 --> 0:53:50.000
<v Speaker 2>to talk about him winning, you, I think there's a

0:53:50.040 --> 0:53:52.680
<v Speaker 2>little bit of concern there. But I think him and

0:53:52.840 --> 0:53:56.000
<v Speaker 2>Matt Wallace are both really good. Kind of Wallace is

0:53:56.040 --> 0:53:58.000
<v Speaker 2>more of a sleeper pig, but they've both been been

0:53:58.000 --> 0:53:59.080
<v Speaker 2>playing really good golf.

0:53:59.600 --> 0:54:01.879
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he's he's got He's got a T six

0:54:01.960 --> 0:54:05.680
<v Speaker 1>and a T fifth at the Open. He's won the

0:54:06.000 --> 0:54:10.080
<v Speaker 1>Dunhill Links Championship a couple of times. Like Elements, he

0:54:10.120 --> 0:54:12.080
<v Speaker 1>seems to play pretty well in Elements.

0:54:12.160 --> 0:54:15.319
<v Speaker 2>You know, I love Matt Wallace this week. I think

0:54:15.360 --> 0:54:18.359
<v Speaker 2>he is. I think he's like one hundred to one

0:54:18.480 --> 0:54:20.880
<v Speaker 2>or something, and to me that's just I mean, he's

0:54:21.000 --> 0:54:23.520
<v Speaker 2>he's been a top five or six ball striker over

0:54:23.520 --> 0:54:27.560
<v Speaker 2>the last three months. So it's like Spith Hovelin, JT

0:54:28.040 --> 0:54:30.879
<v Speaker 2>and Matt Wallace. I think. I think Webb and Web

0:54:30.880 --> 0:54:34.279
<v Speaker 2>and Corey Connors are up there, but Matt Wallace is

0:54:34.440 --> 0:54:36.319
<v Speaker 2>and he's got a top I think he finished T

0:54:37.640 --> 0:54:41.120
<v Speaker 2>three at the twenty nineteen PGA. I think him and

0:54:41.120 --> 0:54:43.040
<v Speaker 2>Speath tied for third at beth Page.

0:54:43.200 --> 0:54:45.279
<v Speaker 1>Matt Fitzpatrick could be a sneaky one too.

0:54:46.360 --> 0:54:49.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I feel like he's We've talked about this on

0:54:49.440 --> 0:54:54.319
<v Speaker 2>on the First Cup podcast over at CBS. Is Fitzpatrick's

0:54:54.360 --> 0:54:57.280
<v Speaker 2>the guy that like how he's not going to compete

0:54:57.320 --> 0:54:59.560
<v Speaker 2>here and then he just keeps doing He keeps doing it.

0:54:59.640 --> 0:55:02.200
<v Speaker 2>He did it at Mirfield Village, he did it, He's

0:55:02.360 --> 0:55:06.360
<v Speaker 2>he does it everywhere and he just is he's really good.

0:55:06.719 --> 0:55:08.960
<v Speaker 2>Like I don't know, Like I finally just kind of

0:55:09.000 --> 0:55:12.160
<v Speaker 2>accepted that he's a really good Top twenty type guy.

0:55:12.480 --> 0:55:14.799
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, he's just been really good for a really long

0:55:14.840 --> 0:55:18.360
<v Speaker 1>time too, at all at all stages of his career.

0:55:18.360 --> 0:55:19.640
<v Speaker 2>He's great pedigree.

0:55:20.200 --> 0:55:22.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, what do you What do you got going on

0:55:22.560 --> 0:55:25.400
<v Speaker 1>this week on First Cut and CBS.

0:55:25.640 --> 0:55:30.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so we've got We've got previews all week. We

0:55:30.800 --> 0:55:33.719
<v Speaker 2>got our big preview on the First Cut coming out

0:55:33.760 --> 0:55:37.319
<v Speaker 2>on I think Tuesday night, and then CBS Sports HQ.

0:55:37.480 --> 0:55:43.400
<v Speaker 2>I'll be doing videos from my little shed here in Dallas, Texas.

0:55:43.960 --> 0:55:46.360
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, it'll be a fun week. I mean, I

0:55:46.480 --> 0:55:48.680
<v Speaker 2>just I could sit here for two more hours and

0:55:48.719 --> 0:55:50.719
<v Speaker 2>talk about this with you. But it's just so fun

0:55:50.760 --> 0:55:53.719
<v Speaker 2>to talk about the majors and legacies and just all

0:55:53.719 --> 0:55:55.799
<v Speaker 2>this different stuff. I love it. I eat it up.

0:55:55.840 --> 0:55:56.600
<v Speaker 2>It's a ton of fun.

0:55:57.280 --> 0:56:01.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you could read read Kyle obviously wonderful words. Uh,

0:56:02.040 --> 0:56:04.800
<v Speaker 1>watch them and and listen to them. You're you're hitting

0:56:04.840 --> 0:56:05.799
<v Speaker 1>all platforms.

0:56:06.239 --> 0:56:09.960
<v Speaker 2>I know, I'm I got. I started doing this and

0:56:10.000 --> 0:56:13.040
<v Speaker 2>it's like ninety writing and now it's like am I

0:56:13.320 --> 0:56:15.160
<v Speaker 2>am I still a writer? Do I still write? Or

0:56:15.239 --> 0:56:16.520
<v Speaker 2>is it just all the other stuff.

0:56:16.960 --> 0:56:19.319
<v Speaker 1>I know. That's why I never I'm going to try

0:56:19.360 --> 0:56:22.839
<v Speaker 1>and get the keys, get the fingers working. This week

0:56:22.960 --> 0:56:26.280
<v Speaker 1>a little bit so great. Look forward to great PGA

0:56:26.719 --> 0:56:30.120
<v Speaker 1>and thanks for coming on and everybody check out Kyle.

0:56:30.239 --> 0:56:33.520
<v Speaker 1>He's on on Twitter too easy to find their great

0:56:33.560 --> 0:56:35.600
<v Speaker 1>follow and uh on everything else.

0:56:35.960 --> 0:57:04.080
<v Speaker 2>Thanks Andy, appreciate it, man,