WEBVTT - Global Chips Battle Intensifies, Apple Nears Deal with OpenAI

0:00:02.440 --> 0:00:07.080
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news.

0:00:08.640 --> 0:00:11.400
<v Speaker 2>From the heart where innovation, money and power.

0:00:11.520 --> 0:00:13.920
<v Speaker 3>Collie in Silicon Valley, NBN.

0:00:14.240 --> 0:00:18.239
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Technology with Caroline Hyde and Ed loved.

0:00:18.079 --> 0:00:33.880
<v Speaker 4>Love and Karline Hein and Bloomberg's world headquarters in New York.

0:00:34.200 --> 0:00:36.720
<v Speaker 5>Now I'm Ed Loudlow in San Francisco. This is Bloomberg

0:00:36.760 --> 0:00:37.959
<v Speaker 5>Technology coming up.

0:00:38.159 --> 0:00:41.479
<v Speaker 4>Full chip coverage ahead. We're bringing the latest headlines from

0:00:41.479 --> 0:00:43.160
<v Speaker 4>in video, arm, Intel and more.

0:00:44.000 --> 0:00:46.680
<v Speaker 5>Plus, Apple nears a deal with open Ai to add

0:00:46.760 --> 0:00:48.279
<v Speaker 5>chat GPT to the iPhone.

0:00:48.520 --> 0:00:52.440
<v Speaker 4>Details ahead and shares of game stock. They surge him

0:00:52.440 --> 0:00:56.040
<v Speaker 4>in speculation that Roaring Kitty is back liking the stock.

0:00:56.200 --> 0:00:58.040
<v Speaker 4>We discussed that and so much more throughout the sabat

0:00:58.080 --> 0:01:00.920
<v Speaker 4>first Le's turn around, attention to the macro picture, some

0:01:01.040 --> 0:01:02.400
<v Speaker 4>new headlines coming out from.

0:01:02.320 --> 0:01:03.000
<v Speaker 6>The New York FED.

0:01:03.000 --> 0:01:05.240
<v Speaker 4>When it comes to consumer sentiment of the direction of

0:01:05.280 --> 0:01:08.000
<v Speaker 4>travel and inflation, and it's still running hot, Dave pot

0:01:08.040 --> 0:01:11.920
<v Speaker 4>three percent in terms of where consumers see inflationary pressures

0:01:11.920 --> 0:01:14.160
<v Speaker 4>being in about a year. That's overall in the midterm.

0:01:14.280 --> 0:01:16.560
<v Speaker 4>We're still holding on too. Gains though three tens percent higher.

0:01:16.560 --> 0:01:19.120
<v Speaker 4>Remember we get a CPI print on Wednesday PPI on

0:01:19.160 --> 0:01:21.000
<v Speaker 4>Tuesday a lot to digest.

0:01:20.680 --> 0:01:21.759
<v Speaker 6>From the macro perspective.

0:01:21.880 --> 0:01:24.920
<v Speaker 4>Two year yield remaining higher, so boring costs coming down,

0:01:24.959 --> 0:01:28.520
<v Speaker 4>yield slipping so two years money going in. Yields go

0:01:28.600 --> 0:01:31.399
<v Speaker 4>lower by some two basis points. Bloomberg Dollar Index also

0:01:31.520 --> 0:01:33.560
<v Speaker 4>down a little bit. Look some of the anxiety around

0:01:33.560 --> 0:01:36.240
<v Speaker 4>in flesher around inflation just stiling back a little bit

0:01:36.280 --> 0:01:38.600
<v Speaker 4>on the day despite that New York Fed data. Let's

0:01:38.640 --> 0:01:39.840
<v Speaker 4>move on and have a look at what's happening in

0:01:39.880 --> 0:01:42.360
<v Speaker 4>the world at bitcoin, because well, even though dollar's only

0:01:42.360 --> 0:01:44.640
<v Speaker 4>off by about ten percent, crypto is surging higher, up

0:01:44.680 --> 0:01:45.600
<v Speaker 4>two point four percent.

0:01:45.640 --> 0:01:46.959
<v Speaker 6>And ed, I know you're going to.

0:01:46.880 --> 0:01:49.160
<v Speaker 4>Focus in on game Stop and this is more the

0:01:49.320 --> 0:01:52.280
<v Speaker 4>reader cross from some of that means stock frenzy and

0:01:52.320 --> 0:01:54.560
<v Speaker 4>when it means on the related names in crypto.

0:01:54.680 --> 0:01:56.360
<v Speaker 6>We're up two percent on bitcoin. What if you've got

0:01:56.400 --> 0:01:57.040
<v Speaker 6>on the micro.

0:02:00.160 --> 0:02:06.800
<v Speaker 5>Stop memestock mania is back. This is a two day

0:02:06.880 --> 0:02:09.680
<v Speaker 5>chart to kind of illustrate the point. GameStop was up

0:02:09.680 --> 0:02:12.480
<v Speaker 5>one hundred and ten percent in the session it was halted.

0:02:12.520 --> 0:02:15.320
<v Speaker 5>We're now up around sixty percent, and it's just from

0:02:15.360 --> 0:02:19.640
<v Speaker 5>one social media post from Roaring Kitty aka Keith Gill

0:02:20.080 --> 0:02:24.520
<v Speaker 5>aka the source of all the original interests around GameStop.

0:02:24.560 --> 0:02:26.440
<v Speaker 5>You know about the movie, you know about what happened

0:02:26.440 --> 0:02:29.280
<v Speaker 5>on Reddit. I think Reddit's higher, robinhood is higher. There's

0:02:29.280 --> 0:02:31.600
<v Speaker 5>a lot of trading that's going on. Later in the show,

0:02:31.600 --> 0:02:34.480
<v Speaker 5>we're going to dig really deep, but I give you

0:02:35.080 --> 0:02:38.640
<v Speaker 5>game Stop. We're looking at other stories in the chip sector.

0:02:38.960 --> 0:02:42.000
<v Speaker 5>In principle, there are three clear headlines and semiconductors.

0:02:42.000 --> 0:02:45.280
<v Speaker 7>Intel is up three point five percent. The Journal reporting.

0:02:44.919 --> 0:02:47.720
<v Speaker 5>It's close with the deal with Apollo for eleven billion

0:02:47.760 --> 0:02:49.880
<v Speaker 5>dollars of financing for an Ireland fab.

0:02:50.440 --> 0:02:52.120
<v Speaker 7>ARM is up more than five percent.

0:02:52.240 --> 0:02:56.400
<v Speaker 5>Nike reporting that ARM is readying an AI product next year,

0:02:56.440 --> 0:02:58.880
<v Speaker 5>didn't say where it got the info, but SoftBank's going

0:02:58.919 --> 0:03:01.519
<v Speaker 5>to support them financially bring it to market. And then

0:03:01.600 --> 0:03:03.480
<v Speaker 5>videos actually high three ten to one percent. It had

0:03:03.480 --> 0:03:07.839
<v Speaker 5>been lower after the Information reported that China is instructing

0:03:07.919 --> 0:03:12.000
<v Speaker 5>domestic companies to stop ordering chips from Nvidia. We have

0:03:12.080 --> 0:03:14.440
<v Speaker 5>a very big segment coming up everything chips. The big

0:03:14.480 --> 0:03:16.400
<v Speaker 5>take today is on chips. There are a lot of

0:03:16.400 --> 0:03:19.720
<v Speaker 5>individual stories to pass through. There is a lot going on, and.

0:03:19.600 --> 0:03:22.400
<v Speaker 4>There is a lot of discussion of China visa VI

0:03:22.520 --> 0:03:25.960
<v Speaker 4>the US coming from well key leaders in US government.

0:03:26.000 --> 0:03:26.440
<v Speaker 6>We had a.

0:03:26.400 --> 0:03:29.280
<v Speaker 4>Great conversation with Janet Yellen earlier own AMERI Horder and

0:03:29.280 --> 0:03:32.040
<v Speaker 4>sitting down with her for an exclusive really discussing China

0:03:32.080 --> 0:03:35.000
<v Speaker 4>in particular. Janey Ellen really feeling that China is not

0:03:35.080 --> 0:03:38.200
<v Speaker 4>playing by the rules on trade and sort of going

0:03:38.240 --> 0:03:40.760
<v Speaker 4>on to say that maybe we will see China escalating

0:03:40.800 --> 0:03:42.640
<v Speaker 4>in the so called tit for tat on trade.

0:03:42.800 --> 0:03:45.080
<v Speaker 6>Just take a lesson. Listen to what Treasures actually told

0:03:45.160 --> 0:03:45.640
<v Speaker 6>us earlier.

0:03:47.760 --> 0:03:52.360
<v Speaker 8>He believes it unacceptable as I do, to be completely

0:03:52.440 --> 0:03:58.240
<v Speaker 8>dependent on China in these areas, and he wants to

0:03:58.320 --> 0:04:03.480
<v Speaker 8>make sure given this that China is really not playing

0:04:03.600 --> 0:04:07.440
<v Speaker 8>by the rules in this sense. They have enormous subsidies

0:04:08.160 --> 0:04:11.120
<v Speaker 8>in critical areas of advanced manufacturing.

0:04:11.560 --> 0:04:14.680
<v Speaker 4>There's a focus on increasing tariffs at a time where

0:04:14.720 --> 0:04:17.960
<v Speaker 4>there's anxiety around inflation. How does this alter the picture

0:04:17.960 --> 0:04:20.520
<v Speaker 4>of your investment landscape visus A. Janet Wi is with

0:04:20.600 --> 0:04:23.719
<v Speaker 4>us RBC Bruin Dolphin, head of market Analysis, and it

0:04:23.880 --> 0:04:27.839
<v Speaker 4>is a time where investors try and navigate seeming headwinds,

0:04:28.040 --> 0:04:30.119
<v Speaker 4>but an ability to keep on going for the growth

0:04:30.120 --> 0:04:32.479
<v Speaker 4>of AI how do you think this lands the China

0:04:32.560 --> 0:04:33.640
<v Speaker 4>versus US at the moment?

0:04:33.760 --> 0:04:37.279
<v Speaker 3>Janet, good morning, hairline. Thanks for having me.

0:04:37.400 --> 0:04:40.239
<v Speaker 1>I think in terms of the tech investment side, we

0:04:40.279 --> 0:04:44.960
<v Speaker 1>will still be heavily preferring the US. I mean, the

0:04:45.120 --> 0:04:48.279
<v Speaker 1>DOS is a hop of innovation, and I think the

0:04:49.000 --> 0:04:52.080
<v Speaker 1>regulatory pressure on China would remain, and I think the

0:04:52.120 --> 0:04:55.839
<v Speaker 1>trade tension parality will hit China more than the US.

0:04:56.320 --> 0:04:57.560
<v Speaker 3>So I think from an.

0:04:57.440 --> 0:05:00.599
<v Speaker 1>Investment perspective, I think all these trade tennis, it's obviously

0:05:00.640 --> 0:05:04.720
<v Speaker 1>it's not great from our price or from global growth

0:05:04.880 --> 0:05:08.200
<v Speaker 1>trade and the global market and certainty point of view.

0:05:08.200 --> 0:05:11.560
<v Speaker 1>But I think sticking with the US investment seems.

0:05:11.279 --> 0:05:14.680
<v Speaker 5>To be the right approach exactly. I'm trying to pass

0:05:14.680 --> 0:05:17.000
<v Speaker 5>all of this together, right. I think there's a growing

0:05:17.160 --> 0:05:21.000
<v Speaker 5>confidence that inflationary pressures are easing off, but a big

0:05:21.040 --> 0:05:25.400
<v Speaker 5>part of that is US fiscal policy. Right, we're talking

0:05:25.520 --> 0:05:28.719
<v Speaker 5>or Jalant Yellen talking about how China has some anti

0:05:28.760 --> 0:05:31.800
<v Speaker 5>competitive practices, but here in the United States, if you

0:05:31.839 --> 0:05:35.120
<v Speaker 5>take the chip industry, this country is also pumping billions

0:05:35.120 --> 0:05:38.440
<v Speaker 5>of dollars into supporting its growth. How does that impact

0:05:38.520 --> 0:05:39.520
<v Speaker 5>you as an investor?

0:05:41.279 --> 0:05:43.640
<v Speaker 3>I think the clear evidence is that.

0:05:45.040 --> 0:05:48.400
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of investment from a sovereign perspective into

0:05:48.560 --> 0:05:51.920
<v Speaker 1>a semiconductors given it is such an important strategic sector.

0:05:52.240 --> 0:05:55.360
<v Speaker 1>So I think the conclusion is that there will be

0:05:55.600 --> 0:05:58.039
<v Speaker 1>lots of money going into it, lots of investment, A

0:05:58.080 --> 0:06:00.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of big players will be involved, and I think

0:06:00.360 --> 0:06:05.000
<v Speaker 1>primarily again the US companies are likely to be benefit

0:06:05.400 --> 0:06:08.840
<v Speaker 1>from this initiative, and that's why we still have a

0:06:08.880 --> 0:06:14.039
<v Speaker 1>positive stance on the general semiconductor value chain story, either

0:06:14.040 --> 0:06:19.680
<v Speaker 1>from the equipment production or from the design, from the manufacturing,

0:06:19.960 --> 0:06:24.279
<v Speaker 1>the boundaries along the whole supply chain. I think there's

0:06:24.320 --> 0:06:26.279
<v Speaker 1>still going to be lots of investment going into it.

0:06:26.320 --> 0:06:30.000
<v Speaker 1>I think valuations in these US companies are still quite

0:06:30.120 --> 0:06:32.840
<v Speaker 1>reasonable given that they're strong earnings growth, and I think

0:06:32.880 --> 0:06:35.599
<v Speaker 1>we still have pretty good visibility into the twenty twenty

0:06:35.600 --> 0:06:39.960
<v Speaker 1>five earnings from the order's guidance, etc. So I think

0:06:40.520 --> 0:06:45.520
<v Speaker 1>the investment thesis we have is that invest in US tech,

0:06:45.720 --> 0:06:48.000
<v Speaker 1>particularly favoring in the semi conductory sector.

0:06:49.400 --> 0:06:52.800
<v Speaker 5>Janet, do we see a rate cut from the FED

0:06:52.880 --> 0:06:56.279
<v Speaker 5>this year to your mind, and if so, when and

0:06:56.320 --> 0:06:57.120
<v Speaker 5>in what increment?

0:06:58.920 --> 0:06:59.320
<v Speaker 7>Well, it is.

0:06:59.320 --> 0:06:59.960
<v Speaker 9>Difficult to say.

0:07:00.000 --> 0:07:02.440
<v Speaker 1>I think the bar for a rage cut is definitely

0:07:02.520 --> 0:07:07.080
<v Speaker 1>higher now will await the CPI print on Wednesday, But

0:07:07.120 --> 0:07:09.800
<v Speaker 1>I think the Fed, I think they have a leaning

0:07:09.920 --> 0:07:12.160
<v Speaker 1>on the next move being a rage.

0:07:11.960 --> 0:07:13.160
<v Speaker 3>Cut rather than a rate hype.

0:07:13.240 --> 0:07:17.600
<v Speaker 1>So I think there's still some preference aren't eventually cutting.

0:07:17.640 --> 0:07:20.000
<v Speaker 1>I think they're really each thing on doing that, but

0:07:20.040 --> 0:07:22.520
<v Speaker 1>they just need the data to allow that so our viewers,

0:07:22.520 --> 0:07:24.360
<v Speaker 1>that is more likely to happen in the fourth quarter.

0:07:24.640 --> 0:07:27.040
<v Speaker 1>But I think the FAT can really move, you know,

0:07:27.520 --> 0:07:29.680
<v Speaker 1>where the data allows. I think there's a lot of

0:07:29.800 --> 0:07:31.520
<v Speaker 1>chatter about how the FED may not be able to

0:07:31.600 --> 0:07:34.680
<v Speaker 1>move because of the timing of the presidential election, but

0:07:34.960 --> 0:07:37.440
<v Speaker 1>we think the FED will focus on the data instead

0:07:37.440 --> 0:07:40.760
<v Speaker 1>of trying to be a pure not to be political.

0:07:41.120 --> 0:07:42.600
<v Speaker 4>I want to go back to what you just mentioned

0:07:42.600 --> 0:07:46.320
<v Speaker 4>about valuations looking pretty good at these levels, and many Janet,

0:07:46.360 --> 0:07:49.640
<v Speaker 4>have just been I mean holding their breath the ARM

0:07:50.320 --> 0:07:53.120
<v Speaker 4>ninety times future earnings valuation that we've seen in ARM

0:07:53.160 --> 0:07:54.640
<v Speaker 4>pops on the day we're going to have a much

0:07:54.680 --> 0:07:56.840
<v Speaker 4>deeper dive into the chip sector in a moment with

0:07:56.880 --> 0:07:59.960
<v Speaker 4>their own in king. But Janet, from an investment landscape perspective,

0:08:00.040 --> 0:08:03.480
<v Speaker 4>do you have to keep on building in the AI

0:08:03.640 --> 0:08:06.400
<v Speaker 4>infrastructure play or do we broaden out at this moment.

0:08:07.880 --> 0:08:10.120
<v Speaker 1>So, I think to your point about the valuation of

0:08:10.360 --> 0:08:13.440
<v Speaker 1>our I can't really comment on an individual company, but

0:08:13.480 --> 0:08:16.560
<v Speaker 1>obviously we know that within the sector there are a

0:08:16.600 --> 0:08:21.880
<v Speaker 1>lot of players and there will be different ranges of evaluations.

0:08:22.160 --> 0:08:24.920
<v Speaker 1>I've talked about it as a group because of the

0:08:24.960 --> 0:08:26.960
<v Speaker 1>straw and a scroll. I think some of the major

0:08:27.000 --> 0:08:30.240
<v Speaker 1>players are the valuations are reasonable, but you have to

0:08:30.240 --> 0:08:33.560
<v Speaker 1>to really look into an individual case. I think in

0:08:33.640 --> 0:08:36.240
<v Speaker 1>terms of the broadening of the thing, we already have

0:08:36.400 --> 0:08:40.120
<v Speaker 1>seen that. I mean there is more confirmation from meget

0:08:40.120 --> 0:08:43.160
<v Speaker 1>cap tech companies that there is commercialization of AI that

0:08:43.280 --> 0:08:46.959
<v Speaker 1>is gaining traction. We see that from Alphabet, Microsoft, Amazon,

0:08:47.000 --> 0:08:50.840
<v Speaker 1>for example. So it has broadened out beyond the just

0:08:50.880 --> 0:08:53.240
<v Speaker 1>the cheap sector. And I think there has been quite

0:08:53.240 --> 0:08:56.720
<v Speaker 1>a significant pickup in the utility sector right because of

0:08:56.720 --> 0:08:59.880
<v Speaker 1>the electricity demounts. So I think they will continue to broaden,

0:09:00.160 --> 0:09:02.120
<v Speaker 1>but I think it has already started.

0:09:03.320 --> 0:09:06.760
<v Speaker 4>I look at evaluation of one particular means Stop today

0:09:06.840 --> 0:09:11.320
<v Speaker 4>janet three thousand times future earnings is where the current

0:09:11.400 --> 0:09:13.920
<v Speaker 4>price of game stop is. Are we going to see

0:09:14.000 --> 0:09:16.439
<v Speaker 4>mean stock frenzy really hit us hard once again.

0:09:18.200 --> 0:09:19.880
<v Speaker 1>Well, it is hard to say. I think right now

0:09:20.000 --> 0:09:23.959
<v Speaker 1>we are seeing a couple of individual stops having that reaction.

0:09:25.440 --> 0:09:27.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure if that's going to last. Is a

0:09:27.679 --> 0:09:32.080
<v Speaker 1>lot driven by social media, but I do think that

0:09:32.600 --> 0:09:36.080
<v Speaker 1>what the current situation is an indication that the risk

0:09:36.200 --> 0:09:40.240
<v Speaker 1>sentiment is back. I think, you know, the positive risk

0:09:40.240 --> 0:09:43.840
<v Speaker 1>sentiment is not constrained anymore by you know, this high

0:09:43.880 --> 0:09:46.679
<v Speaker 1>interest rate and environment, these current level of bios. I

0:09:46.720 --> 0:09:51.120
<v Speaker 1>think the market rally or the market sentiment has already

0:09:51.320 --> 0:09:54.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, we already passed the stage when it's totally

0:09:54.880 --> 0:09:59.680
<v Speaker 1>just driven by the fad and bornios for example. So

0:09:59.760 --> 0:10:02.959
<v Speaker 1>there there's clearly have plenty of cash still sitting around,

0:10:03.240 --> 0:10:04.439
<v Speaker 1>are waiting to be deployed.

0:10:04.880 --> 0:10:05.040
<v Speaker 7>Right.

0:10:06.000 --> 0:10:09.320
<v Speaker 5>Risk sentiment is back, says RBC Brew and Dolphin head

0:10:09.320 --> 0:10:11.720
<v Speaker 5>of market analysis, Janet Marie. Great to have you on

0:10:11.720 --> 0:10:22.640
<v Speaker 5>the show. Let's continue our coverage of semiconductors is Today's

0:10:22.640 --> 0:10:25.720
<v Speaker 5>Bloomberg Big Take focuses on the eighty one billion dollar

0:10:25.760 --> 0:10:29.760
<v Speaker 5>investments made by the US and European Union towards the

0:10:29.800 --> 0:10:33.360
<v Speaker 5>next generation of semis joining US as Bloomberg Zin and King,

0:10:33.440 --> 0:10:35.320
<v Speaker 5>one of the members of the team that went through

0:10:35.320 --> 0:10:37.120
<v Speaker 5>this with the big take. We have a case study

0:10:37.120 --> 0:10:40.679
<v Speaker 5>today right which is Intel in Ireland. The Journal reporting

0:10:40.800 --> 0:10:44.559
<v Speaker 5>that there is advance exclusive talks to Apollo for eleven

0:10:44.600 --> 0:10:47.240
<v Speaker 5>billion in financing. Actually we broke that they were in

0:10:47.320 --> 0:10:50.440
<v Speaker 5>talks quite some time ago. But the need for cash

0:10:50.640 --> 0:10:54.400
<v Speaker 5>and a global footprint is clear through the lens of Intel.

0:10:54.640 --> 0:10:54.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:10:54.880 --> 0:10:57.240
<v Speaker 10>No, I mean Intel is actually in a slightly different

0:10:57.640 --> 0:11:01.720
<v Speaker 10>situation to some of its rivals like TS and Samsong. Frankly,

0:11:01.760 --> 0:11:04.520
<v Speaker 10>it needs the money way more than they do, and

0:11:04.559 --> 0:11:07.240
<v Speaker 10>they can afford to be selective where they take government money,

0:11:07.240 --> 0:11:10.560
<v Speaker 10>what terms they take. Intel, because of the situation it's

0:11:10.559 --> 0:11:13.000
<v Speaker 10>put itself in over the last five or so years,

0:11:13.400 --> 0:11:16.520
<v Speaker 10>really needs the cash from pretty much any source it

0:11:16.559 --> 0:11:19.839
<v Speaker 10>can get if it's to fulfill what it's trying to do, and.

0:11:19.840 --> 0:11:23.200
<v Speaker 4>Let's talk about fulfilling what it and more broadly, the

0:11:23.280 --> 0:11:26.800
<v Speaker 4>US is trying to do what globally countries and companies

0:11:26.800 --> 0:11:28.880
<v Speaker 4>are trying to do. Do we get to an extent

0:11:28.920 --> 0:11:30.280
<v Speaker 4>where we have too much supply in.

0:11:31.480 --> 0:11:33.800
<v Speaker 10>I mean, this is the concern at the moment. The

0:11:33.840 --> 0:11:37.120
<v Speaker 10>concern really though, is focused on what's called the sort

0:11:37.120 --> 0:11:41.080
<v Speaker 10>of legacy chips, the older types of production, the type

0:11:41.120 --> 0:11:44.080
<v Speaker 10>of thing that Intel, TSMC and Samsong are building here

0:11:44.080 --> 0:11:47.600
<v Speaker 10>in the US. Frankly, there's not enough supply of that

0:11:47.679 --> 0:11:50.360
<v Speaker 10>kind of production right now, so not so much worried

0:11:50.360 --> 0:11:54.200
<v Speaker 10>about that, but some of the more simpler kind of

0:11:54.200 --> 0:11:57.040
<v Speaker 10>stuff in view of the amount of production being put

0:11:57.080 --> 0:11:59.800
<v Speaker 10>in place in places like China, that is certainly something

0:11:59.800 --> 0:12:01.640
<v Speaker 10>that people are focused on and worried about.

0:12:02.400 --> 0:12:05.200
<v Speaker 5>AI is a big driver of this. Let's take a

0:12:05.200 --> 0:12:08.360
<v Speaker 5>look at today's big take. Specifically, the headline global chip

0:12:08.400 --> 0:12:12.280
<v Speaker 5>battle intensifies with the eighty one billion dollar subsidies surge,

0:12:12.600 --> 0:12:15.360
<v Speaker 5>But within that there are two different stories. There's kind

0:12:15.440 --> 0:12:19.120
<v Speaker 5>of like the long term capacity on sharing story, and

0:12:19.160 --> 0:12:22.200
<v Speaker 5>then there's psych everyone's knee jerk reaction to keep up

0:12:22.240 --> 0:12:23.520
<v Speaker 5>with what's happening in real time.

0:12:23.960 --> 0:12:26.880
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, I mean, there's you know, everybody's focused on AI.

0:12:27.160 --> 0:12:30.319
<v Speaker 10>But if we believe that this is the future of computing,

0:12:30.360 --> 0:12:33.079
<v Speaker 10>if we believe that this isn't just a step function,

0:12:33.160 --> 0:12:36.600
<v Speaker 10>that this is something quite dramatically different, then obviously the

0:12:36.679 --> 0:12:40.360
<v Speaker 10>ability to control that has enormous implications, both in terms

0:12:40.400 --> 0:12:45.640
<v Speaker 10>of economics and insecurity, and having that production close at

0:12:45.720 --> 0:12:48.559
<v Speaker 10>hand is really important, and this.

0:12:48.600 --> 0:12:52.040
<v Speaker 4>Goes global, not to mention what's currently underway and reporting

0:12:52.080 --> 0:12:55.600
<v Speaker 4>with ARM getting more deeply into AI and soft bank banking,

0:12:55.640 --> 0:12:59.200
<v Speaker 4>that we've got so much to digest. Ianking, a brilliant

0:12:59.320 --> 0:13:01.880
<v Speaker 4>deep dive comes to the big take. Go read it

0:13:01.960 --> 0:13:04.280
<v Speaker 4>online on your terminal. But let's stick with what this

0:13:04.360 --> 0:13:07.800
<v Speaker 4>all means in terms of competitiveness US versus China.

0:13:08.040 --> 0:13:10.520
<v Speaker 6>President Joe Biden is said, of course, to not.

0:13:10.520 --> 0:13:13.040
<v Speaker 4>Just thinking about the chip sector, but more broadly about

0:13:13.360 --> 0:13:16.760
<v Speaker 4>tariffs for drupling them on than Chinese electric vehicles, for example,

0:13:16.880 --> 0:13:19.440
<v Speaker 4>sharply increasing levees for other key industries.

0:13:19.160 --> 0:13:21.160
<v Speaker 6>And it's come as soon as today.

0:13:21.480 --> 0:13:23.680
<v Speaker 4>For more, let's bring in Eliza Tobin, senior director for

0:13:23.720 --> 0:13:27.160
<v Speaker 4>Economy at the Special Competitive Studies Project, And Liza, we

0:13:27.160 --> 0:13:29.160
<v Speaker 4>were just talking about this in the context of a

0:13:29.240 --> 0:13:33.319
<v Speaker 4>frenzy of money from government to support the chip industry.

0:13:33.640 --> 0:13:37.319
<v Speaker 4>But meanwhile Biden's trying to push back EV's coming to China,

0:13:37.400 --> 0:13:40.199
<v Speaker 4>trying to push back solar coming to China from China

0:13:40.240 --> 0:13:43.800
<v Speaker 4>to the US. Is that really got any bite to it?

0:13:43.800 --> 0:13:45.280
<v Speaker 4>It seems more like bark right now.

0:13:47.400 --> 0:13:51.199
<v Speaker 2>Good morning, Caroline ed Greater be on with you. Yes, No,

0:13:51.400 --> 0:13:53.880
<v Speaker 2>this is a really strong move from the Biden administration,

0:13:54.040 --> 0:13:57.560
<v Speaker 2>as you noted the reporter saying that they are thinking

0:13:57.600 --> 0:14:01.560
<v Speaker 2>of quadrupling the terrif right on Chinese evs. As we know,

0:14:02.000 --> 0:14:06.160
<v Speaker 2>China has rocketed to become the top producer of evs

0:14:06.200 --> 0:14:08.600
<v Speaker 2>in just the last few years. They struggled for a

0:14:08.640 --> 0:14:11.920
<v Speaker 2>long time to build a competitive auto export industry and

0:14:11.920 --> 0:14:15.800
<v Speaker 2>now they have gotten there with evs. So currently US

0:14:15.880 --> 0:14:20.520
<v Speaker 2>automakers are insulated by the existing Trump era tariffs, which

0:14:20.560 --> 0:14:23.760
<v Speaker 2>are about twenty seven point five percent, But clearly the

0:14:23.760 --> 0:14:27.360
<v Speaker 2>Biden administration is concerned that going forward, China could use

0:14:27.400 --> 0:14:31.720
<v Speaker 2>its dumping strategy to underprice US automakers and flood the

0:14:31.720 --> 0:14:34.520
<v Speaker 2>market as they are already doing in Europe and elsewhere.

0:14:35.680 --> 0:14:38.040
<v Speaker 5>Eliza, good Morning is ed in San Francisco. So, as

0:14:38.080 --> 0:14:41.200
<v Speaker 5>you point out, sources say that the EV tariff would

0:14:41.280 --> 0:14:44.240
<v Speaker 5>rise to one hundred and two point five percent. But

0:14:44.360 --> 0:14:46.960
<v Speaker 5>based on what you just said, I don't get it.

0:14:47.240 --> 0:14:50.400
<v Speaker 5>I checked, okay, and there are four China made evs

0:14:50.440 --> 0:14:55.240
<v Speaker 5>that retail in this country at incredibly small volumes, Pollstar

0:14:55.320 --> 0:14:59.400
<v Speaker 5>two and four, the new Lotus that's coming, and the

0:14:59.560 --> 0:15:04.840
<v Speaker 5>Volvo ex thirty. What's the point in the tariff if

0:15:04.880 --> 0:15:07.760
<v Speaker 5>those are only the only four models available and they

0:15:07.760 --> 0:15:10.360
<v Speaker 5>only sell in very small numbers.

0:15:10.720 --> 0:15:13.680
<v Speaker 2>The Biden administration is trying to get a head of

0:15:13.720 --> 0:15:17.359
<v Speaker 2>the floods. So, as you noted, right now we are insulated.

0:15:17.800 --> 0:15:22.360
<v Speaker 2>American consumers are by and large not buying Chinese evs.

0:15:22.440 --> 0:15:24.400
<v Speaker 2>They're not coming into our market. But I think they

0:15:24.480 --> 0:15:28.240
<v Speaker 2>see the writing on the wall. German automakers are under threat.

0:15:28.720 --> 0:15:32.680
<v Speaker 2>Europe is importing these things. They're going into Japan, they're

0:15:32.680 --> 0:15:37.640
<v Speaker 2>going in elsewhere, threatening other global automakers. So if the

0:15:37.680 --> 0:15:41.640
<v Speaker 2>Biden administration wants to give the IRA subsidies, the Inflation

0:15:42.120 --> 0:15:46.480
<v Speaker 2>Reduction Acts subsidies, which of course incentivize green tech production

0:15:46.600 --> 0:15:49.520
<v Speaker 2>here in the United States, I think the administration wants

0:15:49.560 --> 0:15:52.440
<v Speaker 2>to give these incentives of fighting chances so that we

0:15:52.480 --> 0:15:56.080
<v Speaker 2>can retain an auto industry here in the United States

0:15:56.080 --> 0:15:59.800
<v Speaker 2>as the world transitions to evs. So it's actually a

0:16:00.280 --> 0:16:03.560
<v Speaker 2>time to raise the terrorists because it won't directly impact

0:16:03.640 --> 0:16:07.320
<v Speaker 2>people's pocketbooks because as you noted, Americans are not yet

0:16:07.360 --> 0:16:08.560
<v Speaker 2>buying Chinese evs.

0:16:08.880 --> 0:16:12.320
<v Speaker 4>And yet, Eliza, you know, when you're thinking about special

0:16:12.360 --> 0:16:15.440
<v Speaker 4>competitiveness in particular, this is the project that you focus

0:16:15.440 --> 0:16:19.960
<v Speaker 4>in on. All of this is undermining, undermining ultimately the

0:16:19.960 --> 0:16:23.920
<v Speaker 4>efficiency of global trade subsidies here, tariffs there, All of

0:16:23.960 --> 0:16:29.080
<v Speaker 4>it will sort of it isn't a mediating what should

0:16:29.080 --> 0:16:30.760
<v Speaker 4>be just the natural flow of things.

0:16:31.440 --> 0:16:33.840
<v Speaker 6>Is this what is necessary ultimately from.

0:16:33.720 --> 0:16:37.720
<v Speaker 4>Your perspective, to ensure that US does remain competitive when

0:16:37.720 --> 0:16:39.239
<v Speaker 4>it comes to key industries.

0:16:39.720 --> 0:16:44.320
<v Speaker 2>There has been this national debate over efficiency versus resilience,

0:16:44.400 --> 0:16:48.320
<v Speaker 2>and the lesson from COVID, from Russia's invasion of Ukraine,

0:16:48.560 --> 0:16:52.040
<v Speaker 2>from these other global supply chain crises we've had in

0:16:52.080 --> 0:16:56.160
<v Speaker 2>the last few years is that efficiency economic efficiency is

0:16:56.240 --> 0:16:58.200
<v Speaker 2>not the only thing we need to think about as

0:16:58.240 --> 0:17:02.160
<v Speaker 2>a nation, and so there's been increasing discussions of resiliency

0:17:02.640 --> 0:17:05.000
<v Speaker 2>and what steps do we need to take as a

0:17:05.119 --> 0:17:08.760
<v Speaker 2>nation to make sure that we continue to build emerging

0:17:08.800 --> 0:17:13.359
<v Speaker 2>technologies here in the United States. We have suffered from

0:17:13.960 --> 0:17:17.640
<v Speaker 2>massive de industrialization over the last several decades as we've

0:17:17.680 --> 0:17:22.359
<v Speaker 2>outsourced the production of our technology to East Asia, especially China.

0:17:22.680 --> 0:17:27.879
<v Speaker 2>So now there's a national conversation about looking ahead, we

0:17:27.920 --> 0:17:30.159
<v Speaker 2>want to make sure we're able to build some of

0:17:30.200 --> 0:17:33.440
<v Speaker 2>these emerging technologies here in the United States not only

0:17:33.480 --> 0:17:36.520
<v Speaker 2>design them, but build them, because that's essential to our

0:17:36.560 --> 0:17:41.280
<v Speaker 2>long term growth in productivity as well as our national security,

0:17:41.359 --> 0:17:43.560
<v Speaker 2>making sure we can make things here at home.

0:17:44.880 --> 0:17:47.440
<v Speaker 5>Liza Tobin of the SCSP, thank you very much. So

0:17:47.520 --> 0:17:49.920
<v Speaker 5>coming up on the program, French President a Manue Macron

0:17:50.160 --> 0:17:53.480
<v Speaker 5>t outs billions of dollars in foreign investments from tech giants.

0:17:53.480 --> 0:17:54.840
<v Speaker 7>We're going to have those details.

0:17:54.440 --> 0:17:57.399
<v Speaker 4>Next, Karen, such global conversation. Meanwhile, let's just bos in

0:17:57.440 --> 0:17:59.919
<v Speaker 4>what's happening for us doc over here? We're not seventy

0:18:00.200 --> 0:18:03.600
<v Speaker 4>percent in the last couple of days on squarespace. Why

0:18:03.760 --> 0:18:07.359
<v Speaker 4>it's going private Permira and all cash transaction, valuing the

0:18:07.400 --> 0:18:10.879
<v Speaker 4>company in approximately six point nine billion dollars. We're going

0:18:10.920 --> 0:18:14.120
<v Speaker 4>to see some vcs giving some more investment General Atlantic

0:18:14.240 --> 0:18:15.360
<v Speaker 4>Acel for example.

0:18:15.720 --> 0:18:16.840
<v Speaker 6>This is bruly meg Technology.

0:18:31.760 --> 0:18:34.480
<v Speaker 4>Microsoft it plans to spend four point three billion dollars

0:18:34.520 --> 0:18:38.639
<v Speaker 4>building cloud and AI infrastructure in France, announcing its latest

0:18:38.640 --> 0:18:42.119
<v Speaker 4>major outlay on artificial intelligence technology. Now, Microsoft is aiming

0:18:42.160 --> 0:18:45.160
<v Speaker 4>to help train a million people support two thousand, five

0:18:45.240 --> 0:18:47.639
<v Speaker 4>hundred startups in France by twenty twenty seven.

0:18:47.800 --> 0:18:47.960
<v Speaker 7>Now.

0:18:48.000 --> 0:18:50.919
<v Speaker 4>Earlier this year, unveiled a partnership and a fifteen million

0:18:50.920 --> 0:18:55.000
<v Speaker 4>euro investment into mistral Ai. It's a Parisian startup competing

0:18:55.000 --> 0:18:57.000
<v Speaker 4>with the course the likes of open Ai. And we

0:18:57.040 --> 0:18:59.600
<v Speaker 4>want to stick with France with investment in France because

0:18:59.640 --> 0:19:02.600
<v Speaker 4>in manual Macron has just unveiled more than fifteen million

0:19:02.680 --> 0:19:06.680
<v Speaker 4>euros in foreign investments from US tech giants like Microsoft,

0:19:06.680 --> 0:19:09.320
<v Speaker 4>but also like Amazon, like IBM, like banks such as

0:19:09.320 --> 0:19:12.320
<v Speaker 4>Morgan Stanley. It's all a part of well trying to

0:19:12.359 --> 0:19:16.280
<v Speaker 4>spa France's economy, to repair its public finances, basically establish

0:19:16.440 --> 0:19:20.400
<v Speaker 4>Paris as well as Europe's post Brexit business and financial hub,

0:19:20.880 --> 0:19:23.040
<v Speaker 4>joining us on all of this. It's Blomberg opinion. Coconomists

0:19:23.119 --> 0:19:26.240
<v Speaker 4>Lionel Laurent. You know, it's interesting. It's a bit of

0:19:26.240 --> 0:19:30.080
<v Speaker 4>a PR exercise that happens every year over at the

0:19:30.119 --> 0:19:33.760
<v Speaker 4>Elyc Palace. But what ultimately is being done by Macron

0:19:33.840 --> 0:19:35.600
<v Speaker 4>to inject some optimism.

0:19:36.119 --> 0:19:39.000
<v Speaker 11>You're right, choose France. It's a bit of a cheesy slogan.

0:19:39.080 --> 0:19:41.520
<v Speaker 11>It could be the cover of an investment brochure, but

0:19:41.640 --> 0:19:45.960
<v Speaker 11>it's not just PR because since he's become president this

0:19:46.000 --> 0:19:48.359
<v Speaker 11>has really bit about the art of the deal Micron style.

0:19:48.480 --> 0:19:49.760
<v Speaker 7>Every year he gathers one.

0:19:49.720 --> 0:19:53.040
<v Speaker 11>Hundred and fifty one hundred and eighty international CEOs wines

0:19:53.080 --> 0:19:56.399
<v Speaker 11>and dines them in Versailles and gives them the pitch

0:19:56.600 --> 0:19:59.360
<v Speaker 11>of the French economy. He'll say, it's doing its job,

0:19:59.400 --> 0:20:01.879
<v Speaker 11>it's doing the work. He's done the work of reforming France.

0:20:02.280 --> 0:20:04.760
<v Speaker 11>And what are you going to do for France From

0:20:04.760 --> 0:20:07.719
<v Speaker 11>the corporate side, which is invest and I think this

0:20:07.800 --> 0:20:10.959
<v Speaker 11>is that puts it, I think a cut above Davos

0:20:11.000 --> 0:20:15.680
<v Speaker 11>because there is investment. You could argue if it's expansion

0:20:15.880 --> 0:20:18.600
<v Speaker 11>of the existing staff instead of new projects. You can

0:20:18.720 --> 0:20:22.280
<v Speaker 11>argue if even fifteen billion is that sort of world

0:20:22.320 --> 0:20:25.880
<v Speaker 11>changing or impressive at the level of tech. But look,

0:20:26.040 --> 0:20:29.440
<v Speaker 11>I think there is something genuinely real to this. There's

0:20:29.480 --> 0:20:32.480
<v Speaker 11>a there's a seed of depth to this that's not just.

0:20:32.440 --> 0:20:36.040
<v Speaker 5>Pr Yeah, Leonor, I think Mistrel put France on the

0:20:36.080 --> 0:20:38.080
<v Speaker 5>map a little bit, you know, in terms of the

0:20:38.080 --> 0:20:43.919
<v Speaker 5>conversation around AI development. But beyond that, we don't often

0:20:43.960 --> 0:20:46.520
<v Speaker 5>go to you, you know, during the program as frequently

0:20:46.520 --> 0:20:49.040
<v Speaker 5>as we do other countries, and it's at a time

0:20:49.040 --> 0:20:52.120
<v Speaker 5>where France's economy is on a shakier footing.

0:20:52.840 --> 0:21:00.600
<v Speaker 11>Wow, that that cuts the here brutal, brutal. I think

0:21:00.680 --> 0:21:04.200
<v Speaker 11>you touched on something which is about relative relative worth

0:21:04.280 --> 0:21:07.680
<v Speaker 11>right now. Mccare came into power at a time when

0:21:07.720 --> 0:21:10.640
<v Speaker 11>the UK was effectively voting itself out of European leadership

0:21:10.960 --> 0:21:15.240
<v Speaker 11>with Brexit, and Angela Merkle's twilight years had begun. I think, honestly,

0:21:15.560 --> 0:21:17.719
<v Speaker 11>as long as the UK is seen as a kind

0:21:17.720 --> 0:21:20.760
<v Speaker 11>of Brexit tainted economy, and as long as Germany's industrial

0:21:20.800 --> 0:21:23.840
<v Speaker 11>model is seen to be suffering, France will still have

0:21:24.000 --> 0:21:26.800
<v Speaker 11>a card to play. Now. I think those two cards,

0:21:26.840 --> 0:21:30.760
<v Speaker 11>to be precise, are human capital. It still has smart,

0:21:30.760 --> 0:21:34.840
<v Speaker 11>talented engineers being pumped out of its graduate schools and universities.

0:21:35.240 --> 0:21:37.399
<v Speaker 11>And the other thing is tax credits. There's an R

0:21:37.440 --> 0:21:39.879
<v Speaker 11>and D tax credit in France that explains why so

0:21:39.960 --> 0:21:43.760
<v Speaker 11>much of what you're seeing is R and D research centers,

0:21:43.800 --> 0:21:47.119
<v Speaker 11>whether it's tech or banks. So clearly there is something

0:21:47.160 --> 0:21:48.320
<v Speaker 11>in it for these companies.

0:21:48.400 --> 0:21:53.760
<v Speaker 5>It's not as pr Leonel Laurent of Bloomberg opinion from France,

0:21:53.840 --> 0:22:04.840
<v Speaker 5>we appreciate it. Welcome back to Bloomberg Technology, ed Lovelow

0:22:04.880 --> 0:22:06.280
<v Speaker 5>here in San Francisco.

0:22:06.040 --> 0:22:07.080
<v Speaker 6>And I'm hired back in New York.

0:22:07.119 --> 0:22:09.560
<v Speaker 4>Let's check on these markets, said, because now we're managing

0:22:09.600 --> 0:22:11.199
<v Speaker 4>to hold onto our gains in the face of some

0:22:11.240 --> 0:22:13.359
<v Speaker 4>inflratory pressure being shown by the New York Fed that

0:22:13.400 --> 0:22:17.360
<v Speaker 4>consumer sentiment showing that still there's elevated inflratory anticipation coming

0:22:17.359 --> 0:22:19.359
<v Speaker 4>from the consumer base. But on a week we have

0:22:19.440 --> 0:22:22.080
<v Speaker 4>CPI and the week we have PPI, which is cautious

0:22:22.119 --> 0:22:23.960
<v Speaker 4>ahead of those macro pieces of data. We're up a

0:22:24.000 --> 0:22:26.480
<v Speaker 4>tenth percent on the NASAK ten yure yields just holding

0:22:26.520 --> 0:22:28.680
<v Speaker 4>lower at four point four eight. I'm looking at Bitcoin

0:22:28.720 --> 0:22:31.159
<v Speaker 4>managing to ramp up two and three quarters a percent.

0:22:31.200 --> 0:22:32.919
<v Speaker 6>Let's call it dollar a little weaker.

0:22:33.359 --> 0:22:35.640
<v Speaker 4>Is this more of a spillover effect from the means

0:22:35.640 --> 0:22:38.399
<v Speaker 4>stock frenzy. Let's move it on one and shine light

0:22:38.440 --> 0:22:41.080
<v Speaker 4>what's happening with good old game stock. We are so

0:22:41.240 --> 0:22:44.840
<v Speaker 4>back up sixty three percent? But is Keith Gill so back?

0:22:44.960 --> 0:22:47.320
<v Speaker 4>Will he return to social media? Of course he did

0:22:47.359 --> 0:22:50.399
<v Speaker 4>pop a particular picture on x many feeling that perhaps

0:22:50.560 --> 0:22:54.080
<v Speaker 4>Roaring Kitty is back when it comes to liking games,

0:22:54.119 --> 0:22:56.520
<v Speaker 4>game stop and memestock mania seems to be back, and

0:22:56.560 --> 0:22:58.480
<v Speaker 4>we'll talk about it later. I shinal light, what's happening

0:22:58.520 --> 0:23:00.960
<v Speaker 4>with the chipset to the Socks Index. Apps up fourteen percent,

0:23:00.960 --> 0:23:03.200
<v Speaker 4>coming off of its highs, but had some notable names

0:23:03.240 --> 0:23:05.680
<v Speaker 4>pushing high Intel that reporting for the Wall Seat Journal,

0:23:05.680 --> 0:23:08.840
<v Speaker 4>building on Bloomberg's reporting that maybe we'll have some financing

0:23:09.000 --> 0:23:13.920
<v Speaker 4>from Apollo with Intel to build yet more ultimately industrial capability,

0:23:13.960 --> 0:23:17.600
<v Speaker 4>manufacturing capability this time in Ireland. We're also seeing what

0:23:17.720 --> 0:23:19.360
<v Speaker 4>arm is currently up to on the day as there's

0:23:19.359 --> 0:23:21.400
<v Speaker 4>anticipation that they're going to be focusing more on AI

0:23:21.440 --> 0:23:24.000
<v Speaker 4>thanks to SoftBank. I'm looking at Alphabet though, up by

0:23:24.000 --> 0:23:27.560
<v Speaker 4>one point six percent. Why more competition? Are they not

0:23:27.600 --> 0:23:30.240
<v Speaker 4>going to be able to integrate Gemini within the new

0:23:30.280 --> 0:23:32.520
<v Speaker 4>Apple iPhone? Is it going to be open Ai that

0:23:32.560 --> 0:23:35.560
<v Speaker 4>wins out Apple? Up more than one point six percent

0:23:35.640 --> 0:23:36.880
<v Speaker 4>and deep dive on it for us.

0:23:37.520 --> 0:23:40.760
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, let's get more on that potential Open Ai Apple

0:23:40.800 --> 0:23:44.679
<v Speaker 5>agreement and bring in Bloomberg intelligence analyst Anna ra Grana. So,

0:23:44.760 --> 0:23:47.720
<v Speaker 5>Anna rag As you know, Bloomberg reported quite late Friday

0:23:47.800 --> 0:23:51.320
<v Speaker 5>nights that Apple and Open Ai are close on a

0:23:51.359 --> 0:23:53.680
<v Speaker 5>deal to bring chat GPT to the iPhone.

0:23:54.000 --> 0:23:55.080
<v Speaker 7>You published your.

0:23:54.960 --> 0:23:59.439
<v Speaker 5>Reaction this morning and in summary you're saying it's a

0:23:59.440 --> 0:24:02.560
<v Speaker 5>pretty sound strategic move outline your thesis.

0:24:03.440 --> 0:24:05.840
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, so when you think about it, you know, Apple's

0:24:05.880 --> 0:24:08.840
<v Speaker 12>not been at the forefront of Generator AI, and the

0:24:08.920 --> 0:24:13.159
<v Speaker 12>next WWDC or the Worldwide Developer Conference in June is

0:24:13.200 --> 0:24:16.080
<v Speaker 12>really you know, aimed at AI. And if Apple's not

0:24:16.119 --> 0:24:18.879
<v Speaker 12>able to showcase really cool features, then you're not going

0:24:18.960 --> 0:24:22.000
<v Speaker 12>to have another round of you know, bad iPhone sales

0:24:22.040 --> 0:24:24.199
<v Speaker 12>over the next twelve months. So they really need to

0:24:24.200 --> 0:24:27.840
<v Speaker 12>push something out that gets consumers excited go get a

0:24:27.880 --> 0:24:30.520
<v Speaker 12>new phone. Requires a little bit more you could say,

0:24:30.520 --> 0:24:32.800
<v Speaker 12>processing power, you know, all sorts of things that go

0:24:32.880 --> 0:24:35.000
<v Speaker 12>with it. So from that point of view, I think

0:24:35.000 --> 0:24:37.720
<v Speaker 12>it's a good deal if they partner with somebody. You know,

0:24:37.800 --> 0:24:40.080
<v Speaker 12>personally I'd like to partner. I like them to partner

0:24:40.119 --> 0:24:42.720
<v Speaker 12>with both of them, frankly, not just with open aiye,

0:24:42.720 --> 0:24:45.480
<v Speaker 12>but Google also because you know, if you know, as

0:24:45.480 --> 0:24:48.239
<v Speaker 12>you remember, when it comes to search, Google pays them

0:24:48.280 --> 0:24:50.360
<v Speaker 12>quite a bit of money and I don't personally don't

0:24:50.359 --> 0:24:52.840
<v Speaker 12>want that partnership to go away for any reason.

0:24:54.480 --> 0:24:57.600
<v Speaker 4>Was it also, though basically an acknowledgment as we've heard,

0:24:57.680 --> 0:25:01.159
<v Speaker 4>with perhaps teaming up with Alphabet and Gemini, they just

0:25:01.320 --> 0:25:03.600
<v Speaker 4>aren't going to be innovating themselves on this level.

0:25:03.640 --> 0:25:05.600
<v Speaker 6>Would they ever usurp and build.

0:25:05.280 --> 0:25:07.520
<v Speaker 4>Their own large ancuage model or is that just not

0:25:07.560 --> 0:25:09.160
<v Speaker 4>where they're going to be bringing AI to bear?

0:25:10.240 --> 0:25:12.280
<v Speaker 12>See, they are spending money and I'm sure they'll have

0:25:12.320 --> 0:25:15.800
<v Speaker 12>their own technology that goes into it. But as Apple

0:25:16.040 --> 0:25:18.280
<v Speaker 12>has done it in the past, they'll like to partner

0:25:18.359 --> 0:25:21.560
<v Speaker 12>with other companies that specialize in that area. And you know,

0:25:21.960 --> 0:25:24.159
<v Speaker 12>there is no secret they have that deal with Google.

0:25:24.320 --> 0:25:28.080
<v Speaker 12>When it comes to search, they use cloud resources from AWS,

0:25:28.080 --> 0:25:31.040
<v Speaker 12>they use cloud resources from Google, so they don't want

0:25:31.040 --> 0:25:31.320
<v Speaker 12>to do.

0:25:31.359 --> 0:25:32.280
<v Speaker 3>Everything in house.

0:25:32.680 --> 0:25:35.560
<v Speaker 12>And if this helps them they sell more iPhones next year,

0:25:35.800 --> 0:25:38.320
<v Speaker 12>you know, I'm okay with them going and partnering with

0:25:38.359 --> 0:25:40.240
<v Speaker 12>anybody that's out there and.

0:25:40.359 --> 0:25:41.480
<v Speaker 6>A Grana loving it.

0:25:41.600 --> 0:25:44.840
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg Intelligence, thank you very much for shining light on

0:25:44.880 --> 0:25:47.480
<v Speaker 4>your own thesis. Let's get that of Tom Forte, DA

0:25:47.600 --> 0:25:50.359
<v Speaker 4>Davidson analyst, and it seems to be the marriage that

0:25:50.400 --> 0:25:51.760
<v Speaker 4>the investor base wants to see.

0:25:51.880 --> 0:25:53.359
<v Speaker 6>But not on Alphabet's perspective.

0:25:54.880 --> 0:25:59.480
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, I think from Apple's perspective, investors are anxiously waiting

0:25:59.560 --> 0:26:03.639
<v Speaker 13>for the company's AI strategy. So whether it's using Google

0:26:03.720 --> 0:26:07.040
<v Speaker 13>or whether it's using open AI to create an advance

0:26:07.119 --> 0:26:10.240
<v Speaker 13>the strategy. I think that's something that potentially you get

0:26:10.240 --> 0:26:14.520
<v Speaker 13>investors excited. I just it's certain though then you may

0:26:14.560 --> 0:26:18.360
<v Speaker 13>not see the boost the iPhone sales. They certainly need

0:26:18.359 --> 0:26:21.159
<v Speaker 13>the boost, still have their revenue today, and then at

0:26:21.240 --> 0:26:23.720
<v Speaker 13>least on a near term basis, AI is still a

0:26:23.800 --> 0:26:27.840
<v Speaker 13>chip story for Nvidia, or hyperscale cloud computing story for

0:26:27.960 --> 0:26:30.600
<v Speaker 13>Azure AWS or Google Cloud.

0:26:32.040 --> 0:26:35.439
<v Speaker 5>Tom Anna Rag said that if this helps sell iPhones

0:26:35.520 --> 0:26:39.000
<v Speaker 5>next year, it's a good thing. There's a much bigger

0:26:39.000 --> 0:26:42.159
<v Speaker 5>discussion happening in the smartphone market about whether or not

0:26:42.200 --> 0:26:46.240
<v Speaker 5>this is the year of the AI smartphone, principally focused

0:26:46.280 --> 0:26:52.320
<v Speaker 5>on Android powered by a Snapdragon processor. Do you see

0:26:52.320 --> 0:26:55.359
<v Speaker 5>an upgrade cycle if this deal gets done?

0:26:56.880 --> 0:27:00.360
<v Speaker 13>The answer is I think of the upgrade cycle from

0:27:00.600 --> 0:27:04.600
<v Speaker 13>five G as being kind of the bell weather and

0:27:04.680 --> 0:27:08.160
<v Speaker 13>the advantage there was that the carriers had invested billions

0:27:08.160 --> 0:27:10.720
<v Speaker 13>of dollars to upgrade their network.

0:27:10.640 --> 0:27:13.720
<v Speaker 3>So they were very vested in getting an upgrade cycle.

0:27:14.119 --> 0:27:15.960
<v Speaker 13>To me, if you want to call it a potential

0:27:16.119 --> 0:27:19.000
<v Speaker 13>AI upgrade cycle, I would put that as a distant

0:27:19.080 --> 0:27:22.680
<v Speaker 13>second to the five G upgrade cycle. But right now,

0:27:22.680 --> 0:27:25.120
<v Speaker 13>I think Apple could use any help when it came

0:27:25.160 --> 0:27:28.280
<v Speaker 13>to sign the iPhone given the overdependence. Again, half their

0:27:28.320 --> 0:27:30.480
<v Speaker 13>revenue last year came from iPhones.

0:27:31.680 --> 0:27:32.560
<v Speaker 6>I mean it is key.

0:27:32.880 --> 0:27:35.280
<v Speaker 4>They're also, of course all in on services, and I

0:27:35.280 --> 0:27:39.399
<v Speaker 4>suppose that's also a key driving force here. Ultimately, Tom,

0:27:39.760 --> 0:27:42.359
<v Speaker 4>there has been this handwringing, this worry that Apple is

0:27:42.400 --> 0:27:44.280
<v Speaker 4>behind the curve, and that yes, they made the pivot

0:27:44.320 --> 0:27:46.600
<v Speaker 4>away from the cars, but it comes too little, too late.

0:27:47.480 --> 0:27:50.400
<v Speaker 4>Do you have optimism that they can steal that back,

0:27:50.440 --> 0:27:52.280
<v Speaker 4>particularly for AI on device.

0:27:54.359 --> 0:27:56.480
<v Speaker 13>No, I do not, and I still actually wish that

0:27:56.480 --> 0:27:58.400
<v Speaker 13>they would return to cars.

0:27:58.800 --> 0:28:00.840
<v Speaker 3>I've talked about how I'm a Model.

0:28:00.560 --> 0:28:02.680
<v Speaker 13>Three owner and I see a million opportunities for Apple

0:28:02.720 --> 0:28:03.359
<v Speaker 13>to do it better.

0:28:04.240 --> 0:28:06.200
<v Speaker 3>Again, I think we have to keep it in perspective.

0:28:06.520 --> 0:28:10.119
<v Speaker 13>AI could be a tremendous boost to apples sales and

0:28:10.160 --> 0:28:13.840
<v Speaker 13>profits over the long term. On a near term basis,

0:28:14.160 --> 0:28:16.960
<v Speaker 13>it could have a positive impact, and I guess iPhone

0:28:17.040 --> 0:28:20.920
<v Speaker 13>sixteen sales to the extent that they're able to market

0:28:21.200 --> 0:28:24.720
<v Speaker 13>something interesting. But I think investors have to be realistic

0:28:24.760 --> 0:28:27.920
<v Speaker 13>on the near term expectations over the next twelve to

0:28:27.960 --> 0:28:31.440
<v Speaker 13>eighteen months, on Apple's ability to leverage AI, and it's

0:28:31.520 --> 0:28:33.520
<v Speaker 13>just not as compelling as a lot of the other

0:28:33.560 --> 0:28:34.480
<v Speaker 13>big tech companies.

0:28:35.520 --> 0:28:38.120
<v Speaker 5>Tom, there's a lot of frenemies out there. At the moment,

0:28:38.240 --> 0:28:41.200
<v Speaker 5>I asked my audience on social media, is an Apple

0:28:41.280 --> 0:28:44.000
<v Speaker 5>Open Ai deal for chat GBT on the iPhone good

0:28:44.040 --> 0:28:47.560
<v Speaker 5>for Microsoft? Because I'm trying to make sense of all this,

0:28:48.880 --> 0:28:50.960
<v Speaker 5>most respondents say good for Microsoft.

0:28:51.000 --> 0:28:53.880
<v Speaker 3>What do you think absolutely good for Microsoft?

0:28:53.880 --> 0:28:57.440
<v Speaker 13>When you think about Microsoft's involvement with open Ai, it's

0:28:57.480 --> 0:28:58.480
<v Speaker 13>good for Microsoft.

0:28:59.160 --> 0:29:01.440
<v Speaker 3>So yes, I think that I like how to use

0:29:01.480 --> 0:29:02.200
<v Speaker 3>the word front of me.

0:29:02.680 --> 0:29:05.240
<v Speaker 13>This is a challenge for Apple, which is does it

0:29:05.400 --> 0:29:09.560
<v Speaker 13>want to leverage open ai given its relationship with Microsoft?

0:29:09.560 --> 0:29:10.959
<v Speaker 3>Does it want to leverage Google?

0:29:11.280 --> 0:29:14.000
<v Speaker 13>Does it want to entrust someone else to something that

0:29:14.000 --> 0:29:18.800
<v Speaker 13>could potentially be this important being artificial intelligence. I still

0:29:18.840 --> 0:29:22.000
<v Speaker 13>look at the Siri as an opportunity for Apple to

0:29:22.040 --> 0:29:23.200
<v Speaker 13>do something better there.

0:29:24.200 --> 0:29:27.040
<v Speaker 3>So this is certainly a challenging situation for Apple.

0:29:27.320 --> 0:29:28.960
<v Speaker 6>Come on, sirih you can do it.

0:29:29.120 --> 0:29:32.200
<v Speaker 4>Meanmail, Tom, what about the Vision pro going on sale

0:29:32.200 --> 0:29:35.120
<v Speaker 4>to more countries? We understand China, Japan, France, Germany?

0:29:35.400 --> 0:29:37.040
<v Speaker 3>Can I help at the margin?

0:29:37.160 --> 0:29:39.800
<v Speaker 13>Yes, I think the most interesting thing we learned about

0:29:39.880 --> 0:29:42.840
<v Speaker 13>Vision pro in the March quarter was how they talked

0:29:42.880 --> 0:29:45.640
<v Speaker 13>about at the enterprise level, which maybe makes the thirty

0:29:45.680 --> 0:29:48.360
<v Speaker 13>four to ninety nine price point make more sense. But

0:29:49.000 --> 0:29:52.320
<v Speaker 13>the challenge we talked about services Hardware sales were down

0:29:52.640 --> 0:29:55.640
<v Speaker 13>double digits in the March quarter, and I think if

0:29:55.640 --> 0:29:58.440
<v Speaker 13>you continue to have declines with hardware at some point,

0:29:58.480 --> 0:30:02.160
<v Speaker 13>that's going to transit or translate lower services sales, which

0:30:02.200 --> 0:30:03.520
<v Speaker 13>is another challenge for the stack.

0:30:03.760 --> 0:30:05.200
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I misspoke.

0:30:05.960 --> 0:30:10.040
<v Speaker 4>Likely to expand to China, to Japan, to France to Germany.

0:30:10.240 --> 0:30:12.600
<v Speaker 5>Likely ed, Yeah, And I think most people say it

0:30:12.640 --> 0:30:14.600
<v Speaker 5>be a bit foolish if they did not. Tom Forte,

0:30:14.720 --> 0:30:17.400
<v Speaker 5>Managing director of Maximum Group. Great to have you on

0:30:17.440 --> 0:30:19.240
<v Speaker 5>the programs Thanking. Now coming up on the show, our

0:30:19.280 --> 0:30:23.400
<v Speaker 5>Kagos founder Bilhuang is defending himself against fraud and market

0:30:23.400 --> 0:30:27.600
<v Speaker 5>manipulation charges in Manhattan. Today we go outside the courthouse. Next,

0:30:27.840 --> 0:30:29.080
<v Speaker 5>this is Bloonbog Technology.

0:30:45.680 --> 0:30:48.360
<v Speaker 4>Now let's get out to a Manhattan federal court where

0:30:48.400 --> 0:30:51.640
<v Speaker 4>our Keago's Capital management founder bilh Wang sand trial over

0:30:51.680 --> 0:30:54.800
<v Speaker 4>his firm's twenty twenty one collapse, facing charges of fraud,

0:30:54.920 --> 0:30:58.200
<v Speaker 4>of racketeering, conspiracy that could end with him behind bars

0:30:58.440 --> 0:31:01.280
<v Speaker 4>for the rest of his life tried alongside the former

0:31:01.360 --> 0:31:06.120
<v Speaker 4>Archago's CFO Patrick Halligan outside that courtroom Shanali Bassek. And

0:31:06.400 --> 0:31:09.640
<v Speaker 4>we understand that the defense lawyer for Bill Wang, currently

0:31:09.680 --> 0:31:12.360
<v Speaker 4>Barry Burke, is taking this down really talking about how

0:31:12.640 --> 0:31:16.160
<v Speaker 4>investment banks were falling over themselves to work with the company,

0:31:16.240 --> 0:31:17.920
<v Speaker 4>and really some of the bets that he made from

0:31:17.920 --> 0:31:22.160
<v Speaker 4>our perspective in tech was Vikom CBS. Now paramount saying

0:31:22.160 --> 0:31:23.400
<v Speaker 4>content was King Shannali.

0:31:24.080 --> 0:31:24.720
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, he is.

0:31:24.800 --> 0:31:27.880
<v Speaker 14>Really driving home that argument to your point. Here, you

0:31:27.960 --> 0:31:30.880
<v Speaker 14>do see the defense council now speaking right after the

0:31:30.920 --> 0:31:34.160
<v Speaker 14>prosecution had made their opening argument, and the defense is

0:31:34.200 --> 0:31:38.280
<v Speaker 14>making this case that our KAGOS was a family office.

0:31:37.720 --> 0:31:41.400
<v Speaker 9>And it was not responsible for outside money. Bill Wang

0:31:41.520 --> 0:31:43.760
<v Speaker 9>was responsible for his own funds.

0:31:44.000 --> 0:31:46.440
<v Speaker 14>It also made the case there that when he made

0:31:46.520 --> 0:31:48.760
<v Speaker 14>these bets, it was his own money that he lost,

0:31:48.840 --> 0:31:52.080
<v Speaker 14>not investors' money on the outside, although we do know

0:31:52.280 --> 0:31:55.640
<v Speaker 14>separately that the banks themselves had lost a significant amount

0:31:55.680 --> 0:31:59.800
<v Speaker 14>of money through engaging in these swap agreements with Huang's firm.

0:32:00.200 --> 0:32:03.520
<v Speaker 14>Now we look at the defense here and they also

0:32:03.560 --> 0:32:05.600
<v Speaker 14>talk about the nature of the bets themselves. You may

0:32:05.640 --> 0:32:08.840
<v Speaker 14>remember when all of this started to unravel. It was

0:32:08.880 --> 0:32:13.720
<v Speaker 14>around ViacomCBS. So you do have the defense attorneys speaking

0:32:13.720 --> 0:32:17.760
<v Speaker 14>to a jury largely not versed in the world of finance,

0:32:17.840 --> 0:32:21.280
<v Speaker 14>Caroline and explaining that Bill Wang was betting on stocks

0:32:21.280 --> 0:32:23.680
<v Speaker 14>that he believed in and that's why he was betting

0:32:23.840 --> 0:32:24.480
<v Speaker 14>so much.

0:32:24.800 --> 0:32:27.400
<v Speaker 9>Some of his earlier bets like Netflix.

0:32:26.880 --> 0:32:29.760
<v Speaker 14>Were hugely profitable for him back in the day, and

0:32:29.840 --> 0:32:32.280
<v Speaker 14>now when he was thinking about the new bets put

0:32:32.320 --> 0:32:36.040
<v Speaker 14>to work, he was making the case that content is king,

0:32:36.240 --> 0:32:39.040
<v Speaker 14>like you're saying, and that's why he bets so much

0:32:39.360 --> 0:32:41.560
<v Speaker 14>on Viacom, essentially through borrow money.

0:32:42.320 --> 0:32:45.360
<v Speaker 5>You know, for US prosecutors, this is a big white

0:32:45.400 --> 0:32:49.520
<v Speaker 5>collar crime case. You know, it's up there in terms

0:32:49.560 --> 0:32:52.719
<v Speaker 5>of the scale and the action by their offices with

0:32:52.760 --> 0:32:55.640
<v Speaker 5>what happened with FTX and others. What are you expecting

0:32:55.680 --> 0:32:58.800
<v Speaker 5>to happen, Shanali? How many days weeks will this go

0:32:58.920 --> 0:32:59.160
<v Speaker 5>on for?

0:33:00.000 --> 0:33:02.880
<v Speaker 14>We take a number of weeks, and remember we do

0:33:03.000 --> 0:33:05.200
<v Speaker 14>have just opening arguments. As we've been talking about, we

0:33:05.240 --> 0:33:09.360
<v Speaker 14>could hear from witnesses ed as soon as today. One

0:33:09.360 --> 0:33:12.200
<v Speaker 14>of the early witnesses, very early on in this trial,

0:33:12.520 --> 0:33:16.920
<v Speaker 14>will be for example, counterparties over at ubs that was

0:33:17.000 --> 0:33:19.520
<v Speaker 14>on the other end of the Billhang call when it

0:33:19.560 --> 0:33:22.480
<v Speaker 14>came to asking for margin. Now, I would also say,

0:33:22.560 --> 0:33:25.000
<v Speaker 14>remember that there are two people that worked at Arcagos

0:33:25.040 --> 0:33:28.880
<v Speaker 14>that have pled guilty and can also be testifying potentially

0:33:28.880 --> 0:33:31.560
<v Speaker 14>throughout the course of this trial in those weeks, and

0:33:31.800 --> 0:33:35.640
<v Speaker 14>one big question mark was how much they acted alone

0:33:35.880 --> 0:33:39.640
<v Speaker 14>or because of the culture at Our Chagos and directed.

0:33:39.200 --> 0:33:42.240
<v Speaker 9>By Bill Huang to do so. This will get.

0:33:42.160 --> 0:33:45.640
<v Speaker 14>Quite contentious because we know that the defense plans to

0:33:45.720 --> 0:33:48.480
<v Speaker 14>show that the banks acted on their own. You saw

0:33:48.480 --> 0:33:50.800
<v Speaker 14>it in the opening arguments, this idea that these banks

0:33:50.800 --> 0:33:53.680
<v Speaker 14>were falling over themselves to work for Bill Huang when

0:33:53.720 --> 0:33:54.840
<v Speaker 14>he was at his height.

0:33:55.240 --> 0:33:57.800
<v Speaker 9>Now, remember another piece of evidence.

0:33:57.400 --> 0:33:59.480
<v Speaker 14>That we wonder about whether it will show the light

0:33:59.520 --> 0:34:01.800
<v Speaker 14>of day and how it will be used is Credit

0:34:01.840 --> 0:34:08.160
<v Speaker 14>Sweez's own risk profile and risk assessment of itself as

0:34:08.239 --> 0:34:08.920
<v Speaker 14>it failed.

0:34:08.960 --> 0:34:10.440
<v Speaker 9>As we know, Our Chagos wasn't.

0:34:10.200 --> 0:34:13.640
<v Speaker 14>The only reason Credit Suitee had failed, but it was

0:34:13.800 --> 0:34:18.359
<v Speaker 14>a massive contributing factor to those significant losses faced by

0:34:18.400 --> 0:34:21.680
<v Speaker 14>Credit Swee as it was failing. So a lot of

0:34:21.719 --> 0:34:24.399
<v Speaker 14>complicated questions in the course of this trial it could

0:34:24.400 --> 0:34:27.160
<v Speaker 14>take weeks to play out. They're facing a number of

0:34:27.520 --> 0:34:31.680
<v Speaker 14>charges here, including racketeering, securities fraud, and wire fraud. The

0:34:31.800 --> 0:34:34.920
<v Speaker 14>charges alone each could face up to twenty years in prison.

0:34:35.239 --> 0:34:37.560
<v Speaker 14>And as we know, some of the attorneys in here,

0:34:37.680 --> 0:34:41.440
<v Speaker 14>the prosecutors were involved in the FTX trial very recently

0:34:41.480 --> 0:34:44.919
<v Speaker 14>as well. So this is in an office coming very

0:34:44.920 --> 0:34:48.360
<v Speaker 14>hard down on white collar crime Sanli.

0:34:48.480 --> 0:34:51.960
<v Speaker 4>Has anything changed to protect this happening again from fominly

0:34:51.960 --> 0:34:55.800
<v Speaker 4>office perspective, from counterpolity perspectives.

0:34:56.320 --> 0:34:58.400
<v Speaker 14>That's the best question I think coming out of this,

0:34:58.520 --> 0:35:01.360
<v Speaker 14>because this trial does have thetential to draw light again

0:35:01.640 --> 0:35:03.839
<v Speaker 14>to a lot of the practices that got us here,

0:35:04.200 --> 0:35:07.120
<v Speaker 14>and if you think about it, swaps rules in some

0:35:07.360 --> 0:35:09.160
<v Speaker 14>form have been altered.

0:35:09.480 --> 0:35:11.720
<v Speaker 9>The SEC had taken a look at it, The.

0:35:11.560 --> 0:35:15.160
<v Speaker 14>SEC and the CFTC have fought over jurisdiction around a

0:35:15.200 --> 0:35:17.319
<v Speaker 14>lot of these trades. Some of the ways that they

0:35:17.360 --> 0:35:20.640
<v Speaker 14>have been changed were simply post two thousand and eight

0:35:20.760 --> 0:35:24.759
<v Speaker 14>Dodd Frank rules that were changed not until recently. But

0:35:24.840 --> 0:35:27.359
<v Speaker 14>to a point about family offices and disclosure that has

0:35:27.400 --> 0:35:31.000
<v Speaker 14>not been changed, and that is something that regulators may

0:35:31.040 --> 0:35:33.839
<v Speaker 14>take a look at once again, given what happened here

0:35:33.960 --> 0:35:35.400
<v Speaker 14>and given that nothing.

0:35:35.120 --> 0:35:37.360
<v Speaker 9>Is really different for any future problems.

0:35:38.200 --> 0:35:41.000
<v Speaker 4>Dollie sloud out there. We thank you for being outside

0:35:41.000 --> 0:35:43.640
<v Speaker 4>the Manhattan Court. Now let's have to go to you.

0:35:43.800 --> 0:35:43.840
<v Speaker 7>Ed.

0:35:44.680 --> 0:35:47.360
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, let's get some other news headlines in today's Talking

0:35:47.400 --> 0:35:50.000
<v Speaker 5>Tech and First Soft Bank laid out plans to get

0:35:50.160 --> 0:35:53.600
<v Speaker 5>more aggressive in AI and other fields after reporting a

0:35:53.680 --> 0:35:56.800
<v Speaker 5>second quarter profit and surge in the value of assets,

0:35:56.840 --> 0:36:01.399
<v Speaker 5>including a surge of armstock since the IPA last year plus.

0:36:01.480 --> 0:36:05.360
<v Speaker 5>Jaumi aims to begin making and selling an SUV similar

0:36:05.360 --> 0:36:08.520
<v Speaker 5>to Tesla's Model hy as early as twenty twenty five,

0:36:08.560 --> 0:36:11.919
<v Speaker 5>embarking on a major new expansion, with production of its

0:36:11.920 --> 0:36:15.640
<v Speaker 5>debut SU seven electric car set to reach about one

0:36:15.680 --> 0:36:19.760
<v Speaker 5>hundred thousand units this year. And zero one Dot Ai,

0:36:19.880 --> 0:36:23.759
<v Speaker 5>the Beijing startup founded by tech pioneer Kaifu Lee, is

0:36:23.840 --> 0:36:27.600
<v Speaker 5>introducing its first AI application for consumers, a step aimed

0:36:27.600 --> 0:36:31.640
<v Speaker 5>at helping China capitalize on the promising technology. The firm's

0:36:31.640 --> 0:36:34.880
<v Speaker 5>free productivity assistant is called one G and it's the

0:36:34.960 --> 0:36:37.800
<v Speaker 5>latest in a series of AI products it's developing.

0:36:37.880 --> 0:36:39.720
<v Speaker 7>Kaifulee spoke with Bloomberg's David.

0:36:39.640 --> 0:36:43.480
<v Speaker 5>Ingless and Yvon Mann about that in competition from big

0:36:43.520 --> 0:36:44.480
<v Speaker 5>tech companies, listen to.

0:36:44.480 --> 0:36:49.520
<v Speaker 15>This companies like Meta, Google, Microsoft are putting fifty one

0:36:49.600 --> 0:36:52.680
<v Speaker 15>hundred times more resources in this, so we certainly don't

0:36:52.719 --> 0:36:56.320
<v Speaker 15>take it lightly. So as we catch up with currently

0:36:56.360 --> 0:36:59.880
<v Speaker 15>best model, we realize that even better models will come

0:37:00.200 --> 0:37:03.840
<v Speaker 15>from Open Air and others, and we want to stay

0:37:03.880 --> 0:37:07.279
<v Speaker 15>as close as we can. But we also think it's

0:37:07.440 --> 0:37:11.360
<v Speaker 15>about building a great user experience, is really understanding what

0:37:11.480 --> 0:37:16.480
<v Speaker 15>the users want and using that, which is China's advantage.

0:37:16.520 --> 0:37:20.400
<v Speaker 15>As Jen said earlier, if you think about Chinese applications,

0:37:21.040 --> 0:37:25.440
<v Speaker 15>TikTok is better than Instagram. Products like Temu and Shean

0:37:25.760 --> 0:37:29.600
<v Speaker 15>have taken over the world. Users love it. I think

0:37:29.719 --> 0:37:35.080
<v Speaker 15>China's ability to develop great applications that focus on what

0:37:35.200 --> 0:37:38.880
<v Speaker 15>users want and that product market fit is a unique

0:37:38.880 --> 0:37:40.360
<v Speaker 15>attribute to Chinese companies.

0:37:41.280 --> 0:37:41.880
<v Speaker 6>I feeling that.

0:37:51.360 --> 0:37:55.400
<v Speaker 5>Game Stop shares surged amid speculation on the return to

0:37:55.480 --> 0:38:00.440
<v Speaker 5>social media by Keith Gill aka Roaring Kit, and it's

0:38:00.520 --> 0:38:05.200
<v Speaker 5>driven a meme stock mania emblematic of what happened in

0:38:05.239 --> 0:38:08.239
<v Speaker 5>twenty twenty one. That's his latest post on actually see

0:38:08.239 --> 0:38:08.879
<v Speaker 5>it right there?

0:38:09.160 --> 0:38:10.080
<v Speaker 7>What does it mean?

0:38:11.160 --> 0:38:14.399
<v Speaker 5>Let's bring in Bloomberg's Bailey Lipschaltz, who, along with meme

0:38:14.480 --> 0:38:19.359
<v Speaker 5>stock mania, is so back, Bailey, You're back. Roaring Kitty's back.

0:38:19.440 --> 0:38:21.120
<v Speaker 5>But what does that mean?

0:38:21.760 --> 0:38:23.880
<v Speaker 16>I don't know, And it means that he's back to Twitter.

0:38:23.960 --> 0:38:27.640
<v Speaker 16>He posted a video that actually had clips of the

0:38:27.680 --> 0:38:32.000
<v Speaker 16>movie Wolverine. He also posted a montage that had a

0:38:32.040 --> 0:38:33.720
<v Speaker 16>Ferris Bueller on his day off.

0:38:33.800 --> 0:38:34.360
<v Speaker 7>It's a lot of.

0:38:34.440 --> 0:38:38.160
<v Speaker 16>Questions and it's circulating Reddit, stock, Twits, Discord, you name it,

0:38:38.280 --> 0:38:40.960
<v Speaker 16>and investors are speculating that if Roaring Kitty's back on

0:38:40.960 --> 0:38:43.319
<v Speaker 16>social media, maybe that means he likes the stock again,

0:38:43.360 --> 0:38:45.320
<v Speaker 16>and maybe that's a reason people should buy the stock.

0:38:45.440 --> 0:38:50.680
<v Speaker 16>That's really the galaxy brain of the retail crowd at

0:38:50.680 --> 0:38:52.840
<v Speaker 16>this point as it relates to GameStop.

0:38:52.400 --> 0:38:55.040
<v Speaker 4>Because yeah, just give us the context of where else

0:38:55.080 --> 0:38:57.799
<v Speaker 4>this is a lit of fire, not only just GameStop,

0:38:58.160 --> 0:39:02.400
<v Speaker 4>but crypto related to games and also well just heavily

0:39:02.400 --> 0:39:04.400
<v Speaker 4>shortened names that are out there in the retail space.

0:39:04.480 --> 0:39:07.800
<v Speaker 16>Exactly everything that moved back in twenty twenty one costs

0:39:07.840 --> 0:39:10.680
<v Speaker 16>and see you name it. Beyond, which bought the bed

0:39:10.719 --> 0:39:14.000
<v Speaker 16>back and Beyond ran from the company after it went bankrupt,

0:39:14.040 --> 0:39:18.560
<v Speaker 16>is rallying. Carently, it's really just kind of like a

0:39:18.640 --> 0:39:21.160
<v Speaker 16>question around what the next stock could be, and it

0:39:21.160 --> 0:39:23.440
<v Speaker 16>almost brings back the shades and the argument around is

0:39:23.480 --> 0:39:25.400
<v Speaker 16>this retail traders or is this Wall Street? And are

0:39:25.480 --> 0:39:28.040
<v Speaker 16>people speculating where they can put money to work? And

0:39:28.080 --> 0:39:30.759
<v Speaker 16>what actually is driving the rally because when you look

0:39:30.760 --> 0:39:33.920
<v Speaker 16>at what happened back in twenty twenty one, obviously the

0:39:33.920 --> 0:39:35.720
<v Speaker 16>retail crowd was part of it. Obviously they were buying

0:39:35.760 --> 0:39:37.640
<v Speaker 16>call options, but there are a lot of questions around

0:39:37.640 --> 0:39:40.040
<v Speaker 16>who else was buying because Wall Street doesn't really let

0:39:40.080 --> 0:39:42.000
<v Speaker 16>other people make money if they can get in on

0:39:42.040 --> 0:39:42.400
<v Speaker 16>the trade.

0:39:42.440 --> 0:39:46.640
<v Speaker 4>Well besidesly, so is this a going to target shortstocks

0:39:46.680 --> 0:39:48.919
<v Speaker 4>and any particular hedge funds in particular as we saw

0:39:48.920 --> 0:39:51.480
<v Speaker 4>back in twenty twenty one, But also did the retail

0:39:51.520 --> 0:39:53.920
<v Speaker 4>crowd want to be parling in using robin Hood once

0:39:53.960 --> 0:39:55.760
<v Speaker 4>again because robin Hood came out sort.

0:39:55.560 --> 0:39:59.240
<v Speaker 6>Of a foe and a friend in the situation.

0:39:59.320 --> 0:40:01.320
<v Speaker 16>Yeah, a whole the bit around removing the buy button

0:40:01.360 --> 0:40:02.680
<v Speaker 16>as an area I don't want.

0:40:02.480 --> 0:40:04.440
<v Speaker 7>To get into, but it does.

0:40:06.400 --> 0:40:08.480
<v Speaker 16>But it does seem like we are still seeing those

0:40:08.520 --> 0:40:10.759
<v Speaker 16>animal spirits and that's really one of the questions is

0:40:10.960 --> 0:40:14.040
<v Speaker 16>who's buying and who's selling. Because we saw GameStop up

0:40:14.080 --> 0:40:16.799
<v Speaker 16>sixty eight percent. In the three weeks prior to the

0:40:16.920 --> 0:40:19.840
<v Speaker 16>Roaring Kiddy post, we saw the busiest week from a

0:40:19.920 --> 0:40:23.279
<v Speaker 16>volume perspective since April twenty twenty two, so people were

0:40:23.280 --> 0:40:24.520
<v Speaker 16>buying the stock out of the money.

0:40:24.560 --> 0:40:26.400
<v Speaker 7>Call options were active in the two.

0:40:26.280 --> 0:40:29.200
<v Speaker 16>Weeks leading up to today's rally, so a lot of

0:40:29.280 --> 0:40:30.840
<v Speaker 16>questions about what actually was going.

0:40:30.719 --> 0:40:31.560
<v Speaker 3>On under the surface.

0:40:32.480 --> 0:40:34.880
<v Speaker 5>I see, I see some animal spirits in you, and

0:40:34.920 --> 0:40:38.319
<v Speaker 5>you're reporting in your grasp of the data. There are

0:40:38.320 --> 0:40:42.200
<v Speaker 5>some animal spirits in other names, like Reddit's higher robin

0:40:42.200 --> 0:40:44.680
<v Speaker 5>hood at was higher. I saw on down Detecta that

0:40:44.680 --> 0:40:48.680
<v Speaker 5>e trade has been difficult for some users since the open.

0:40:49.200 --> 0:40:50.480
<v Speaker 7>So take that information.

0:40:50.560 --> 0:40:53.480
<v Speaker 5>It just explained the basics of the relationship of the

0:40:53.560 --> 0:40:57.280
<v Speaker 5>trading in these names and what's happening with meme stalts

0:40:57.320 --> 0:40:57.880
<v Speaker 5>more broadly.

0:40:58.200 --> 0:41:00.520
<v Speaker 16>So we're seeing really a pushback into a lot of

0:41:00.520 --> 0:41:04.080
<v Speaker 16>those retail names, and that's new names like Trump Media

0:41:04.120 --> 0:41:06.360
<v Speaker 16>and Reddit and old names like AMC and Costs. But

0:41:06.400 --> 0:41:09.160
<v Speaker 16>we are seeing a lot of these systems being inundated

0:41:09.160 --> 0:41:11.560
<v Speaker 16>with buy orders, and that really can put a strain

0:41:11.680 --> 0:41:13.719
<v Speaker 16>on some of the systems to try to pair up

0:41:13.760 --> 0:41:16.399
<v Speaker 16>buyers and sellers. And that's why you see a number

0:41:16.400 --> 0:41:18.759
<v Speaker 16>of these trades kind of potentially fail to deliver and

0:41:18.840 --> 0:41:20.040
<v Speaker 16>a number of other issues.

0:41:20.080 --> 0:41:21.680
<v Speaker 3>This is not the short.

0:41:21.480 --> 0:41:23.399
<v Speaker 16>Mania that it was in twenty twenty one when over

0:41:23.400 --> 0:41:25.919
<v Speaker 16>one hundred and forty percent of game Stop was sold short.

0:41:25.920 --> 0:41:28.360
<v Speaker 16>It's closer to twenty four percent. But this is creating

0:41:28.360 --> 0:41:30.920
<v Speaker 16>a lot of issues for the underlying systems that are

0:41:30.920 --> 0:41:32.640
<v Speaker 16>trying to match up these.

0:41:32.840 --> 0:41:33.799
<v Speaker 9>Buy and sell orders.

0:41:33.800 --> 0:41:35.960
<v Speaker 16>And that also with the volatility and with some of

0:41:35.960 --> 0:41:37.680
<v Speaker 16>the swings where people were trying to put in orders

0:41:37.680 --> 0:41:40.040
<v Speaker 16>at that's totally saw the stock halted eight times for

0:41:40.120 --> 0:41:42.640
<v Speaker 16>volatility in the first hour because there was so much

0:41:42.680 --> 0:41:45.400
<v Speaker 16>of an order and an order backlog among these retail

0:41:45.440 --> 0:41:48.719
<v Speaker 16>platforms that don't have clients, that have clients that do

0:41:48.719 --> 0:41:51.200
<v Speaker 16>not have access to after hours or pre market trading,

0:41:51.320 --> 0:41:54.400
<v Speaker 16>so that also can create kind of this bottleneck, if

0:41:54.440 --> 0:41:56.640
<v Speaker 16>you will, of buy and sell orders in that first

0:41:56.760 --> 0:41:59.840
<v Speaker 16>sixty minutes. Even the first ten minutes of trading was

0:42:00.080 --> 0:42:00.720
<v Speaker 16>quite volatile.

0:42:00.719 --> 0:42:01.480
<v Speaker 7>I'm quite heckic.

0:42:02.360 --> 0:42:05.080
<v Speaker 4>It's back, it's up and training right now, and Bailey

0:42:05.080 --> 0:42:06.960
<v Speaker 4>Lipshalt's have a feeling we'll have a busy day.

0:42:07.120 --> 0:42:09.720
<v Speaker 6>We thank him on all things Meme frenzy.

0:42:09.840 --> 0:42:12.920
<v Speaker 4>Meanwhile, look, that does it for this edition of Bloomberg Technology.

0:42:13.040 --> 0:42:17.200
<v Speaker 4>There's some discussions happening, and what's Opening Eyes about to

0:42:17.239 --> 0:42:19.000
<v Speaker 4>announce in the next couple of minutes.

0:42:19.800 --> 0:42:21.319
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, so a big event coming up the top of

0:42:21.320 --> 0:42:23.760
<v Speaker 5>the hour, And now you've got a hard choice. Tonight,

0:42:23.800 --> 0:42:27.080
<v Speaker 5>you can recap the podcast Bloomberg Technology, which is a

0:42:27.160 --> 0:42:29.960
<v Speaker 5>must listen, or you can watch the movie Done Money,

0:42:30.160 --> 0:42:32.799
<v Speaker 5>which is basically a buyer pic of Roaring Kiddy.

0:42:33.120 --> 0:42:33.759
<v Speaker 7>Check both out.

0:42:33.800 --> 0:42:36.960
<v Speaker 5>This is Bloomberg Technology from San Francisco in New York.