WEBVTT - AMD CEO Lisa Su on the Chipmaker's AI Forecast

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:13.400
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. Bloomberg Tech is alive

0:00:13.440 --> 0:00:17.280
<v Speaker 1>from coast to coast with Caroline Hide in New York

0:00:17.560 --> 0:00:19.560
<v Speaker 1>and Eva low in Sent Francisco.

0:00:22.280 --> 0:00:24.079
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Tech coming up.

0:00:24.120 --> 0:00:27.160
<v Speaker 3>The White House says Apple will commit to spend another

0:00:27.360 --> 0:00:30.200
<v Speaker 3>one hundred billion dollars on domestic manufacturing.

0:00:30.400 --> 0:00:33.320
<v Speaker 4>Plus, we speak with AMD CEO Lisa Sue on the

0:00:33.360 --> 0:00:35.919
<v Speaker 4>back of the company's earnings.

0:00:35.440 --> 0:00:39.000
<v Speaker 3>And Bloomberg reports Open aiyes in talks for a potential

0:00:39.080 --> 0:00:42.800
<v Speaker 3>insider share sale that would value the company at five

0:00:43.080 --> 0:00:46.200
<v Speaker 3>hundred billion dollars extraordinary valuations.

0:00:46.280 --> 0:00:48.520
<v Speaker 4>I turn my attention to the companies that are already

0:00:48.520 --> 0:00:51.239
<v Speaker 4>public and already reporting earnings ed and actually I'm on

0:00:51.280 --> 0:00:53.200
<v Speaker 4>the downside. They're all in the red at the moment.

0:00:53.240 --> 0:00:56.040
<v Speaker 4>Quickly wit through what AMD is up to down the worst.

0:00:56.040 --> 0:00:59.720
<v Speaker 4>It's October twenty twenty four. This is the China concerns,

0:01:00.120 --> 0:01:02.279
<v Speaker 4>the idea of when we're going to seem I three

0:01:02.400 --> 0:01:05.440
<v Speaker 4>or eight actually getting into the hands of Chinese customers,

0:01:05.600 --> 0:01:08.080
<v Speaker 4>non enough charity. We dig into that with Lisasu a little.

0:01:07.920 --> 0:01:08.960
<v Speaker 2>Bit in the show.

0:01:08.959 --> 0:01:11.959
<v Speaker 4>Because remember the earnings did beat on expectations thirty two

0:01:11.959 --> 0:01:14.440
<v Speaker 4>percent growth and revenue. I'm looking at Disney also beating,

0:01:14.840 --> 0:01:17.280
<v Speaker 4>but again there is a concern perhaps around age old

0:01:17.400 --> 0:01:21.880
<v Speaker 4>entertainment movies about TV that didn't manage to live up

0:01:21.880 --> 0:01:24.919
<v Speaker 4>to expectations, held back some of those profitability growth targets.

0:01:24.959 --> 0:01:27.160
<v Speaker 4>We're looking at Disney off by three percent, uber also

0:01:27.200 --> 0:01:28.240
<v Speaker 4>by two point four percent.

0:01:28.480 --> 0:01:30.320
<v Speaker 2>It too be It too actually.

0:01:30.120 --> 0:01:32.280
<v Speaker 4>Said they're going to be doing twenty billion dollar buy back,

0:01:32.600 --> 0:01:34.679
<v Speaker 4>but they're going to have to invest in autonomous and

0:01:34.720 --> 0:01:37.600
<v Speaker 4>maybe that's the insecurity here, Ed, But what do you got?

0:01:37.720 --> 0:01:39.200
<v Speaker 2>Okay, let's get to that Apple news.

0:01:39.240 --> 0:01:41.240
<v Speaker 3>The stocks actually just come off session highs, but it's

0:01:41.280 --> 0:01:44.080
<v Speaker 3>on track for its biggest jump since early May. One

0:01:44.200 --> 0:01:48.400
<v Speaker 3>hundred billion dollars in additional investment in US manufacturing and

0:01:48.440 --> 0:01:51.200
<v Speaker 3>supply chain. But here's the thing, that's all coming from

0:01:51.240 --> 0:01:53.280
<v Speaker 3>the White House. So let's get out to Washington, DC

0:01:53.640 --> 0:01:56.720
<v Speaker 3>and bloombergs Tyler Kendall, who joins us from the White

0:01:56.760 --> 0:01:59.400
<v Speaker 3>House as we wait for I guess the Apple side

0:01:59.520 --> 0:02:00.320
<v Speaker 3>of what's happen happening?

0:02:00.360 --> 0:02:01.680
<v Speaker 2>But Tyler, what do we need to know?

0:02:02.800 --> 0:02:03.080
<v Speaker 5>Yeah?

0:02:03.120 --> 0:02:05.320
<v Speaker 6>Hey, Ed, Well, the White House says that this one

0:02:05.400 --> 0:02:08.840
<v Speaker 6>hundred billion dollar investment pledge is expected to go towards

0:02:08.880 --> 0:02:12.400
<v Speaker 6>a new manufacturing program that would in theory bring more

0:02:12.440 --> 0:02:15.680
<v Speaker 6>of Apple supply chains to the US, and the official

0:02:15.720 --> 0:02:19.600
<v Speaker 6>says that this brings the cumulative investment from Apple to

0:02:19.720 --> 0:02:22.680
<v Speaker 6>six hundred billion dollars. Because, as you well know and mentioned,

0:02:22.840 --> 0:02:25.760
<v Speaker 6>this bill A builds on a previous five hundred billion

0:02:26.120 --> 0:02:28.680
<v Speaker 6>dollar pledge from the company over four years. But with

0:02:28.720 --> 0:02:31.919
<v Speaker 6>that pledge we saw some really specific investment angles, including

0:02:32.080 --> 0:02:34.200
<v Speaker 6>that some of it would go towards building a factory

0:02:34.200 --> 0:02:37.400
<v Speaker 6>in Texas that holds AI servers. Part of it would

0:02:37.400 --> 0:02:40.480
<v Speaker 6>go towards twenty thousand jobs in the US really focused

0:02:40.480 --> 0:02:43.480
<v Speaker 6>on training as well as research and development. Now, our

0:02:43.520 --> 0:02:46.920
<v Speaker 6>reporting indicates that while this investment is substantial, it likely

0:02:46.960 --> 0:02:50.720
<v Speaker 6>falls short for the full production shift that this White

0:02:50.720 --> 0:02:53.639
<v Speaker 6>House really wants to see, though it is worth pointing

0:02:53.639 --> 0:02:56.880
<v Speaker 6>out twenty four percent of Apple suppliers are based in

0:02:57.040 --> 0:03:00.120
<v Speaker 6>the US already, the most of any country. Still, well,

0:03:00.200 --> 0:03:02.079
<v Speaker 6>we'll have to see if it's enough for President Trump

0:03:02.280 --> 0:03:05.200
<v Speaker 6>to perhaps give some sort of a reprieve when it

0:03:05.240 --> 0:03:08.000
<v Speaker 6>does come to the company. We know that the CEO team,

0:03:08.000 --> 0:03:11.200
<v Speaker 6>Tim Cook, has been lobbying for some sort of carve

0:03:11.240 --> 0:03:14.080
<v Speaker 6>out here, considering that earlier this year, President Trump had

0:03:14.080 --> 0:03:17.359
<v Speaker 6>threatened a twenty five percent tariff ed if Apple did

0:03:17.360 --> 0:03:19.400
<v Speaker 6>not move production to the United States.

0:03:19.880 --> 0:03:22.840
<v Speaker 4>Amid all of this, of course, is that threat on

0:03:22.960 --> 0:03:26.560
<v Speaker 4>Apple exclusively, but also there's threats on high tariff for India,

0:03:26.600 --> 0:03:29.160
<v Speaker 4>where they've been shifting some of their supply chain to Tyler.

0:03:29.600 --> 0:03:32.359
<v Speaker 4>As we know, it is incredibly difficult, if not nigh

0:03:32.400 --> 0:03:35.080
<v Speaker 4>on impossible for them to really bring production of the

0:03:35.120 --> 0:03:37.640
<v Speaker 4>iPhone to the United States. Do you think that that's

0:03:37.640 --> 0:03:41.560
<v Speaker 4>starting to curry favor or at least appreciation in the administration.

0:03:42.080 --> 0:03:44.760
<v Speaker 6>Right Well, today we saw really an escalation when it

0:03:44.800 --> 0:03:47.280
<v Speaker 6>did come to India rate. President Trump now posing an

0:03:47.320 --> 0:03:51.360
<v Speaker 6>additional twenty five percent tariff over India's imports of Russian

0:03:51.480 --> 0:03:53.520
<v Speaker 6>energy supply, which would bring the tear freight on that

0:03:53.600 --> 0:03:56.840
<v Speaker 6>country up to fifty percent. They're expected to be stacked

0:03:56.840 --> 0:03:58.880
<v Speaker 6>on top of each other. That additional rate to go

0:03:58.920 --> 0:04:00.800
<v Speaker 6>into effect in the next twenty one day, So we'll

0:04:00.840 --> 0:04:03.080
<v Speaker 6>have to see if there's some sort of negotiation that

0:04:03.200 --> 0:04:05.640
<v Speaker 6>happens here. It is clear though that the administration is

0:04:05.680 --> 0:04:08.200
<v Speaker 6>going to like this investment. The White House is already

0:04:08.200 --> 0:04:11.120
<v Speaker 6>out touting it because they really want to start to

0:04:11.160 --> 0:04:13.400
<v Speaker 6>see these funds coming in. And if you look at

0:04:13.400 --> 0:04:16.000
<v Speaker 6>all the unique deals perhaps that we've gotten from our

0:04:16.040 --> 0:04:18.839
<v Speaker 6>training partners so far, a lot of them do ultimately

0:04:18.880 --> 0:04:21.080
<v Speaker 6>have to do with investment funds. And the second thing

0:04:21.080 --> 0:04:22.680
<v Speaker 6>that I'll also put on your radar is that we

0:04:22.720 --> 0:04:26.080
<v Speaker 6>are expecting those sector specific tariffs to come down soon.

0:04:26.120 --> 0:04:28.200
<v Speaker 6>This administration has said we can see them as soon

0:04:28.240 --> 0:04:30.080
<v Speaker 6>as next week when it comes to chips. But really

0:04:30.160 --> 0:04:32.359
<v Speaker 6>important to keep in mind that the Section two thirty

0:04:32.360 --> 0:04:35.640
<v Speaker 6>two investigations, yes, are into semiconductors, but they're into the

0:04:35.800 --> 0:04:38.440
<v Speaker 6>entire supply chain, which means that we could really see

0:04:38.640 --> 0:04:39.880
<v Speaker 6>some wide ranging impacts.

0:04:40.120 --> 0:04:40.440
<v Speaker 2>That's far.

0:04:40.440 --> 0:04:43.160
<v Speaker 4>One hundred billion dollar extra commitment adds one hundred and

0:04:43.200 --> 0:04:45.479
<v Speaker 4>twenty billion dollars in terms of market cap to Apple

0:04:45.520 --> 0:04:48.760
<v Speaker 4>on the day, Tyler Kendall, thank you. Let's check in

0:04:48.839 --> 0:04:52.240
<v Speaker 4>on other companies now. Earnings Disney lower after the media

0:04:52.279 --> 0:04:56.480
<v Speaker 4>company reported third quarter revenue actually coming in slightly below

0:04:56.520 --> 0:05:01.360
<v Speaker 4>expectations but highlighting strength and streaming and the sparks business bugs.

0:05:01.400 --> 0:05:04.039
<v Speaker 4>Felix Jullett joins us for more look, they were ever

0:05:04.120 --> 0:05:07.080
<v Speaker 4>so slightly amiss in terms of general revenue growth of

0:05:07.160 --> 0:05:09.159
<v Speaker 4>just two percent, But it really seems to be the

0:05:09.160 --> 0:05:11.080
<v Speaker 4>old school part of the business they let them down.

0:05:12.520 --> 0:05:14.920
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, the traditional part of the business in terms of

0:05:15.279 --> 0:05:18.880
<v Speaker 7>you know, the movie studio, the cable and broadcast channels

0:05:19.240 --> 0:05:24.039
<v Speaker 7>are all you know, continuing to show decline and that

0:05:24.120 --> 0:05:26.320
<v Speaker 7>you know has been offside someone by the growth in

0:05:26.440 --> 0:05:29.000
<v Speaker 7>streaming and parks, which have been very strong.

0:05:30.160 --> 0:05:30.640
<v Speaker 2>Felix.

0:05:30.960 --> 0:05:31.080
<v Speaker 8>Uh.

0:05:31.480 --> 0:05:36.320
<v Speaker 3>Streaming is many parts. But listening to Bob Iiger on

0:05:36.400 --> 0:05:39.480
<v Speaker 3>the Cool Sports, I just want to recap his position

0:05:39.520 --> 0:05:41.320
<v Speaker 3>on ESPN because I think it's worth discussion.

0:05:41.360 --> 0:05:41.840
<v Speaker 2>Listen to this.

0:05:42.760 --> 0:05:46.520
<v Speaker 5>We're building ESPN into the pre eminent digital sports platform

0:05:46.880 --> 0:05:51.120
<v Speaker 5>with our highly anticipated Director consumer sports offering launching on

0:05:51.160 --> 0:05:54.280
<v Speaker 5>August twenty first, and there are just announced plans with

0:05:54.360 --> 0:05:58.680
<v Speaker 5>the NFL that will expand ESPN's programming and content offerings

0:05:58.720 --> 0:05:59.680
<v Speaker 5>for fans.

0:06:00.600 --> 0:06:02.080
<v Speaker 2>August twenty first, not far away.

0:06:02.120 --> 0:06:04.680
<v Speaker 3>Like how big a piece of the strategy is sports

0:06:04.720 --> 0:06:05.919
<v Speaker 3>and streaming and combination?

0:06:06.880 --> 0:06:09.160
<v Speaker 7>Oh, a huge part of the strategy. I mean, they

0:06:09.200 --> 0:06:12.040
<v Speaker 7>want to grow their advertising revenue and streaming. To do that,

0:06:12.120 --> 0:06:14.720
<v Speaker 7>you need live events. There's nothing bigger in live events

0:06:14.760 --> 0:06:17.279
<v Speaker 7>than the NFL. This deal with the NFL that they

0:06:17.320 --> 0:06:20.960
<v Speaker 7>announced today, NFL gets a stake in ESPN and ESPN

0:06:21.080 --> 0:06:24.680
<v Speaker 7>gets control of some of the NFL's media properties, including

0:06:24.800 --> 0:06:28.440
<v Speaker 7>the Red Zone NFL Network, and also crucially, we'll get

0:06:28.440 --> 0:06:31.320
<v Speaker 7>more NFL games as part of this package. That's huge.

0:06:31.360 --> 0:06:33.520
<v Speaker 7>It's going to help them in terms of growing their

0:06:33.560 --> 0:06:36.680
<v Speaker 7>advertising business. And at the same time they announced the

0:06:36.680 --> 0:06:41.680
<v Speaker 7>deal today with TKOSWWE, the Wrestling Network, they're going to

0:06:41.680 --> 0:06:45.960
<v Speaker 7>get a bunch of big live events, including in WrestleMania. Again,

0:06:46.040 --> 0:06:49.279
<v Speaker 7>that too is going to bolster this new ESPN product

0:06:49.640 --> 0:06:53.400
<v Speaker 7>and get more people watching it at particular times, which

0:06:53.440 --> 0:06:54.760
<v Speaker 7>will help them with advertisers.

0:06:55.240 --> 0:06:58.240
<v Speaker 4>Is there going to be any regulatory concern around this

0:06:58.560 --> 0:07:00.520
<v Speaker 4>about just the big getting to a bigger in the

0:07:00.520 --> 0:07:01.200
<v Speaker 4>world of sports.

0:07:02.600 --> 0:07:04.160
<v Speaker 7>I mean, yeah, I think that this is going to

0:07:04.240 --> 0:07:07.480
<v Speaker 7>have to get regulatory approval. As we've seen with Paramount,

0:07:07.520 --> 0:07:09.760
<v Speaker 7>that can cause a lot of problems in this current

0:07:09.840 --> 0:07:13.600
<v Speaker 7>environment with the Trump administration, So that is a concern,

0:07:14.720 --> 0:07:16.720
<v Speaker 7>But I think you know, what they're trying to do

0:07:16.840 --> 0:07:20.760
<v Speaker 7>is again just build up. You know, they've been talking

0:07:20.760 --> 0:07:24.000
<v Speaker 7>about this direct to consumer ESPN product for years now.

0:07:24.040 --> 0:07:26.080
<v Speaker 7>This is a huge launch. It's been a long time

0:07:26.080 --> 0:07:28.320
<v Speaker 7>in the making and to come out with news that

0:07:28.320 --> 0:07:31.680
<v Speaker 7>you're going to have more NFL games, more WWE. I

0:07:31.680 --> 0:07:34.080
<v Speaker 7>think that's what they're trying to drive the excitement around

0:07:34.120 --> 0:07:34.559
<v Speaker 7>at the moment.

0:07:35.680 --> 0:07:38.560
<v Speaker 3>Felix, you learn when you cover technology earnings in particular,

0:07:38.640 --> 0:07:42.160
<v Speaker 3>sometimes it's what they don't say that drives stories. And

0:07:42.600 --> 0:07:45.440
<v Speaker 3>I'm sorry to even ask this, but what's the latest

0:07:45.480 --> 0:07:46.200
<v Speaker 3>on Bob Eiger?

0:07:46.480 --> 0:07:47.600
<v Speaker 2>Like is he going to be there.

0:07:47.520 --> 0:07:50.600
<v Speaker 3>Forever and ever infinity or do they have some plans

0:07:50.640 --> 0:07:52.000
<v Speaker 3>in place for what happens next?

0:07:52.720 --> 0:07:55.960
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, I mean, the succession issue with Disney never quite

0:07:56.040 --> 0:07:59.800
<v Speaker 7>goes away. You know, it's been the focus of investors

0:08:00.080 --> 0:08:03.200
<v Speaker 7>long time. They bodged it the last time Bob came back.

0:08:03.320 --> 0:08:06.160
<v Speaker 7>They have to get it right this time. You know,

0:08:06.240 --> 0:08:08.920
<v Speaker 7>there's been endless speculation about who that's going to be.

0:08:09.560 --> 0:08:12.520
<v Speaker 7>Looks like the internal candidates are really getting narrowed down.

0:08:13.440 --> 0:08:17.760
<v Speaker 7>But you know, again, TBD, that's all the next chapter

0:08:17.840 --> 0:08:19.760
<v Speaker 7>of Disney and they have to really stick the landing

0:08:19.840 --> 0:08:20.240
<v Speaker 7>this time.

0:08:27.880 --> 0:08:31.400
<v Speaker 3>Welcome to our global audience across Bloomberg television and radio.

0:08:31.800 --> 0:08:35.520
<v Speaker 3>We're joined by AMD CEO Lisa Sue. And it was

0:08:35.559 --> 0:08:38.240
<v Speaker 3>such an interesting quarter to look back at Data Center

0:08:38.280 --> 0:08:43.120
<v Speaker 3>in particular CPU strength, not just accelerators, strong AI outlook

0:08:43.160 --> 0:08:47.440
<v Speaker 3>on accelerators, gaming PC, and then some concern about the

0:08:47.480 --> 0:08:50.240
<v Speaker 3>future of the China business. But Caroline and I Lisa

0:08:50.280 --> 0:08:53.240
<v Speaker 3>have talks for quite a while now about AMD as

0:08:53.280 --> 0:08:56.200
<v Speaker 3>the best performing chip stock so far this year. I

0:08:56.240 --> 0:08:58.880
<v Speaker 3>wondered if we start by just asking what in the

0:08:59.040 --> 0:09:02.600
<v Speaker 3>quarter changed for a MD what the kind of biggest

0:09:02.880 --> 0:09:04.480
<v Speaker 3>move forward was, do you think.

0:09:05.280 --> 0:09:08.000
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, absolutely so. First of all, Ed and Caroline, great

0:09:08.040 --> 0:09:10.520
<v Speaker 8>to be here with you. We always, you know, look

0:09:10.559 --> 0:09:13.560
<v Speaker 8>at these things and say, when we have a business

0:09:13.559 --> 0:09:17.120
<v Speaker 8>where all of our businesses are actually performing extremely well,

0:09:17.800 --> 0:09:19.400
<v Speaker 8>it's a good it's a good place to be.

0:09:19.559 --> 0:09:20.480
<v Speaker 9>So we had a very.

0:09:20.280 --> 0:09:22.800
<v Speaker 8>Strong first half of the year, you know, second quarter

0:09:22.960 --> 0:09:23.840
<v Speaker 8>up thirty two.

0:09:23.640 --> 0:09:24.800
<v Speaker 9>Percent year over year.

0:09:24.920 --> 0:09:27.839
<v Speaker 8>We're guiding to a third quarter you know, up twenty

0:09:27.880 --> 0:09:28.440
<v Speaker 8>eight percent.

0:09:28.559 --> 0:09:30.520
<v Speaker 9>And underneath that what you see is.

0:09:30.520 --> 0:09:33.040
<v Speaker 8>You know, first of all, data center business is doing

0:09:33.320 --> 0:09:36.960
<v Speaker 8>extremely well. Our server CPUs are continuing to gain share

0:09:37.320 --> 0:09:40.040
<v Speaker 8>in cloud and in enterprise. One of the things that

0:09:40.080 --> 0:09:43.160
<v Speaker 8>we're seeing with AI is the AI investments from the

0:09:43.240 --> 0:09:46.920
<v Speaker 8>largest hyperscalers are actually pulling you know, both GPU and

0:09:47.040 --> 0:09:48.400
<v Speaker 8>CPU revenue, you.

0:09:48.320 --> 0:09:50.000
<v Speaker 9>Know, which is good for us overall.

0:09:50.040 --> 0:09:52.760
<v Speaker 8>You know, augentic AI actually requires lots and lots of

0:09:52.760 --> 0:09:56.880
<v Speaker 8>compute going forward. We're also seeing strength in you know,

0:09:56.960 --> 0:10:01.359
<v Speaker 8>PCs as well as gaming. Our products are extremely well positioned,

0:10:01.679 --> 0:10:05.120
<v Speaker 8>whether you're talking about you know, consumer or commercial. And

0:10:05.120 --> 0:10:08.160
<v Speaker 8>then we're also seeing you know, some improvement in the

0:10:08.200 --> 0:10:10.600
<v Speaker 8>embedded side of our business as you know, that is

0:10:10.640 --> 0:10:13.320
<v Speaker 8>also you know, going to I would say, return to

0:10:13.360 --> 0:10:15.560
<v Speaker 8>growth in the second half of the year. So we've

0:10:15.559 --> 0:10:18.280
<v Speaker 8>seen a lot of positive signals over the last ninety

0:10:18.360 --> 0:10:21.200
<v Speaker 8>days in terms of, you know, what the market needs

0:10:21.679 --> 0:10:24.600
<v Speaker 8>from computing and sort of the investment and things. You know,

0:10:24.600 --> 0:10:27.360
<v Speaker 8>there are some questions about China, of course, which you

0:10:27.360 --> 0:10:28.559
<v Speaker 8>know we can certainly talk about.

0:10:29.600 --> 0:10:34.040
<v Speaker 3>Well, let's talk first about the AI accelerator outlook, because

0:10:34.080 --> 0:10:37.320
<v Speaker 3>actually from analysts to investors, to develop a community, when

0:10:37.320 --> 0:10:39.200
<v Speaker 3>we say that you're coming on the show, we get

0:10:39.280 --> 0:10:42.319
<v Speaker 3>questions from all quarters. You had said that the AI

0:10:42.360 --> 0:10:45.320
<v Speaker 3>accelerator business will grow to the tens of billions, and

0:10:45.360 --> 0:10:47.680
<v Speaker 3>what I'm kind of seeing is people just want granularity

0:10:47.679 --> 0:10:50.280
<v Speaker 3>from Lysia a little bit like when does that happen

0:10:50.360 --> 0:10:52.920
<v Speaker 3>and when does it happen? And you talked about the hyperscalers.

0:10:53.160 --> 0:10:56.120
<v Speaker 3>But what's the growth pathway to tens of billions in

0:10:56.559 --> 0:10:57.840
<v Speaker 3>accelerator revenue?

0:10:58.400 --> 0:11:01.000
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, absolutely, ed, So let me give you a few

0:11:01.080 --> 0:11:04.400
<v Speaker 8>important markers. So what we said is the second half

0:11:04.440 --> 0:11:07.600
<v Speaker 8>of the year, our growth would be primarily driven in

0:11:07.640 --> 0:11:11.400
<v Speaker 8>the data center by accelerators. We launched a new product

0:11:11.960 --> 0:11:16.720
<v Speaker 8>just in June I three fifty five product. It's extremely competitive.

0:11:17.200 --> 0:11:19.440
<v Speaker 8>We really like how we stack up in terms of

0:11:19.440 --> 0:11:23.440
<v Speaker 8>total cost of ownership for inferencing and training workloads. Customers

0:11:23.480 --> 0:11:26.800
<v Speaker 8>really like that product. That's driving some of our second

0:11:26.840 --> 0:11:29.679
<v Speaker 8>half growth, and certainly when we talk about our sequential

0:11:29.679 --> 0:11:32.400
<v Speaker 8>growth into Q three, that's being primarily driven by that

0:11:32.480 --> 0:11:33.839
<v Speaker 8>accelerator capability.

0:11:34.200 --> 0:11:34.800
<v Speaker 9>And now when you.

0:11:34.880 --> 0:11:38.240
<v Speaker 8>Extend forward, you know I've said that the AI TAM

0:11:38.320 --> 0:11:41.959
<v Speaker 8>for accelerators and data center will be over five hundred

0:11:42.000 --> 0:11:44.439
<v Speaker 8>billion over the next couple of years. You know, we

0:11:44.520 --> 0:11:48.199
<v Speaker 8>expect to get a large portion of that new accelerator

0:11:48.240 --> 0:11:50.280
<v Speaker 8>TAM and that's how we get to tens.

0:11:50.040 --> 0:11:51.200
<v Speaker 9>Of billions of dollars.

0:11:51.640 --> 0:11:54.880
<v Speaker 8>Very key is also, you know, we've accelerated our roadmap

0:11:54.960 --> 0:11:57.760
<v Speaker 8>and so we are on an annual cadence and next

0:11:57.880 --> 0:12:01.240
<v Speaker 8>year we'll have yet a new capability with our four

0:12:01.320 --> 0:12:04.760
<v Speaker 8>hundred series, which will bring full rack level solutions, which

0:12:04.760 --> 0:12:08.319
<v Speaker 8>will be another giant step forward in terms of capability

0:12:08.920 --> 0:12:11.720
<v Speaker 8>for you know, AI solutions. So I think that's the

0:12:11.800 --> 0:12:14.959
<v Speaker 8>roadmap and path for the next couple of years. We're

0:12:15.559 --> 0:12:18.560
<v Speaker 8>really excited about the traction. We're getting lots of customer

0:12:18.640 --> 0:12:22.080
<v Speaker 8>validation saying hey, you're on absolutely the right path, and

0:12:22.440 --> 0:12:25.160
<v Speaker 8>you know we're making strong progress towards those goals.

0:12:25.679 --> 0:12:29.360
<v Speaker 4>Lisa, the granularity there was demanded time and time again

0:12:29.480 --> 0:12:32.680
<v Speaker 4>on that earning score with analysts was around China though,

0:12:32.720 --> 0:12:34.640
<v Speaker 4>and I know it's so hard to give because in

0:12:34.679 --> 0:12:37.040
<v Speaker 4>many ways, as m I threeh eight, it's depending on

0:12:37.040 --> 0:12:38.520
<v Speaker 4>the licenses from the US government.

0:12:38.960 --> 0:12:40.480
<v Speaker 9>How are those discussions going with.

0:12:40.440 --> 0:12:42.240
<v Speaker 4>The US government. How quickly do you think they can

0:12:42.280 --> 0:12:43.200
<v Speaker 4>get through the backlog?

0:12:44.080 --> 0:12:45.400
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, Caroline, definitely.

0:12:45.480 --> 0:12:48.160
<v Speaker 8>Look, you know, I know people always want precision, and

0:12:48.200 --> 0:12:51.760
<v Speaker 8>what I will give you is exactly how things are

0:12:51.800 --> 0:12:54.800
<v Speaker 8>playing out from our standpoint. I think we've seen an

0:12:54.840 --> 0:12:57.439
<v Speaker 8>improvement over the last ninety days. You know, ninety days ago,

0:12:58.120 --> 0:12:59.960
<v Speaker 8>you know, we did not expect to believe to shift

0:13:00.520 --> 0:13:02.400
<v Speaker 8>to be able to ship to China because of some

0:13:02.480 --> 0:13:07.800
<v Speaker 8>of the regulations I think this administration, the Department of Commerce,

0:13:07.800 --> 0:13:11.240
<v Speaker 8>the government has actually been very open to trying to

0:13:11.240 --> 0:13:14.800
<v Speaker 8>find the right balance between national security and ensuring that

0:13:14.840 --> 0:13:20.360
<v Speaker 8>we have AI USAI technologies proliferated across the world. So

0:13:20.400 --> 0:13:23.360
<v Speaker 8>we think that's a great balance. We now know that

0:13:23.640 --> 0:13:25.960
<v Speaker 8>we have a number of licenses that are under review.

0:13:26.400 --> 0:13:29.160
<v Speaker 8>We've been given good indications that those are moving through

0:13:29.200 --> 0:13:33.439
<v Speaker 8>the review process, and we will certainly inform everyone when

0:13:33.440 --> 0:13:35.960
<v Speaker 8>the licenses are granted. But given that it's hard to

0:13:35.960 --> 0:13:38.880
<v Speaker 8>predict exact timing, just given all of the things that

0:13:38.920 --> 0:13:40.840
<v Speaker 8>are in front of the government at the moment, we

0:13:40.880 --> 0:13:43.360
<v Speaker 8>thought the right thing to do right now is just say, hey,

0:13:44.120 --> 0:13:47.520
<v Speaker 8>let's not include that in the third quarter revenue. But

0:13:47.679 --> 0:13:50.920
<v Speaker 8>even with that, we're growing twenty eight percent year over year,

0:13:51.000 --> 0:13:53.800
<v Speaker 8>which is fantastic growth rate. And if you asked me,

0:13:54.200 --> 0:13:56.280
<v Speaker 8>you know what we've learned in the last ninety days,

0:13:56.320 --> 0:13:58.560
<v Speaker 8>We've learned that the demand is even stronger in the

0:13:58.559 --> 0:14:01.200
<v Speaker 8>second half of the year. And we necessarily, you know,

0:14:01.280 --> 0:14:02.880
<v Speaker 8>thought maybe just a few months ago.

0:14:02.920 --> 0:14:06.120
<v Speaker 4>And analysts really cooperated and thought it was right that

0:14:06.120 --> 0:14:08.720
<v Speaker 4>we should see such caution perhaps and not show up

0:14:08.720 --> 0:14:11.640
<v Speaker 4>in the numbers. But Lisa, I'm interested in the inventory

0:14:11.679 --> 0:14:13.720
<v Speaker 4>that you had been very clear about the eight hundred

0:14:13.720 --> 0:14:16.400
<v Speaker 4>million dollar knock on the fact that you couldn't access

0:14:16.480 --> 0:14:18.600
<v Speaker 4>China for a while. I know that most of those

0:14:18.679 --> 0:14:21.480
<v Speaker 4>manufacturing hadn't been complete, but do you think you can

0:14:21.600 --> 0:14:24.240
<v Speaker 4>unwind that eight hundred million how much you think can

0:14:24.280 --> 0:14:25.600
<v Speaker 4>you bring that back to bear?

0:14:26.760 --> 0:14:30.960
<v Speaker 8>Well, we certainly expect that once licenses are approved, that

0:14:31.040 --> 0:14:35.520
<v Speaker 8>we will restart our supply chain and get those in place.

0:14:36.120 --> 0:14:37.720
<v Speaker 8>We do have, you know, a bit of time that

0:14:37.760 --> 0:14:39.760
<v Speaker 8>it takes to complete those, but we would expect to

0:14:39.760 --> 0:14:42.360
<v Speaker 8>be able, you know, to ship some of those products

0:14:42.400 --> 0:14:45.320
<v Speaker 8>as licenses are approved. And you know, again the exact

0:14:45.320 --> 0:14:49.200
<v Speaker 8>timing will depend on when licenses are approved. But I

0:14:49.240 --> 0:14:51.640
<v Speaker 8>again would hope that we don't get caught up in

0:14:52.360 --> 0:14:56.000
<v Speaker 8>something that I would say is moving actually in the

0:14:56.040 --> 0:14:59.240
<v Speaker 8>right direction and really see like the overall business is

0:14:59.280 --> 0:15:02.280
<v Speaker 8>doing extremely well. Right when I look at data center growth,

0:15:02.320 --> 0:15:04.800
<v Speaker 8>when I look at client and gaming growth, and really

0:15:04.880 --> 0:15:06.840
<v Speaker 8>the return to growth in the embedded those are the

0:15:06.920 --> 0:15:12.040
<v Speaker 8>key aspects to really understand about where the business is today.

0:15:13.280 --> 0:15:13.560
<v Speaker 2>Lisa.

0:15:13.880 --> 0:15:16.800
<v Speaker 3>The final question that we have on China, if I may,

0:15:17.240 --> 0:15:19.960
<v Speaker 3>is something that we've also discussed quite often with Video

0:15:20.000 --> 0:15:23.640
<v Speaker 3>and Jensen. One which is the idea that in the

0:15:23.640 --> 0:15:28.040
<v Speaker 3>interim period you just outlined, China's domestic chip makers have

0:15:28.160 --> 0:15:31.600
<v Speaker 3>made some progress on their own accelerators. Does a m

0:15:31.680 --> 0:15:35.960
<v Speaker 3>D make an assessment of that of how performance a

0:15:36.000 --> 0:15:40.320
<v Speaker 3>comparable Huawei or other Chinese accelerator is relative to them?

0:15:40.400 --> 0:15:41.800
<v Speaker 2>I three hundred family.

0:15:42.840 --> 0:15:45.400
<v Speaker 8>And of course, I mean, look, it's a very competitive

0:15:45.440 --> 0:15:48.280
<v Speaker 8>market out there. At the end of the day, everybody

0:15:48.360 --> 0:15:52.200
<v Speaker 8>wants AI computing, Like AI computing is the foundation for

0:15:52.440 --> 0:15:54.800
<v Speaker 8>you know, all the great things that we know that

0:15:54.840 --> 0:15:58.320
<v Speaker 8>AI can add to, you know, businesses and you know,

0:15:58.360 --> 0:15:58.720
<v Speaker 8>sort of.

0:15:58.640 --> 0:15:59.960
<v Speaker 9>The overall capability.

0:16:00.240 --> 0:16:04.120
<v Speaker 8>So yes, we're always looking at the competitive environment. That

0:16:04.240 --> 0:16:07.080
<v Speaker 8>being the case, you know, I think we are well positioned.

0:16:07.400 --> 0:16:07.960
<v Speaker 9>Overall.

0:16:08.160 --> 0:16:11.200
<v Speaker 8>Our roadmap for the rest of the world is very strong,

0:16:11.480 --> 0:16:13.960
<v Speaker 8>and we think is just getting stronger as we go forward,

0:16:14.160 --> 0:16:16.160
<v Speaker 8>and as it relates to China, it's something that we

0:16:16.240 --> 0:16:18.480
<v Speaker 8>have to work through with the administration, but as I said,

0:16:18.560 --> 0:16:22.600
<v Speaker 8>we've had very close conversations and we're making good progress there.

0:16:22.640 --> 0:16:25.880
<v Speaker 8>So from that standpoint, you know, I think the overall

0:16:25.920 --> 0:16:29.280
<v Speaker 8>competitiveness of our AI roadmap has never been stronger. And

0:16:29.320 --> 0:16:32.520
<v Speaker 8>we're excited about what we can deliver across you know,

0:16:32.560 --> 0:16:35.920
<v Speaker 8>AI GPUs as well as you know, our our CPU

0:16:36.000 --> 0:16:39.160
<v Speaker 8>franchise and all of the rest of our portfolio.

0:16:40.360 --> 0:16:43.880
<v Speaker 3>This is Bloomberg Tech Live on Bloomberg Television and Bloomberg Radio,

0:16:43.920 --> 0:16:47.960
<v Speaker 3>and we're speaking with AMD CEO Lisa Sue Strong in

0:16:48.080 --> 0:16:53.480
<v Speaker 3>PC Strong in server particularly CPU. Is that an a

0:16:53.680 --> 0:16:57.000
<v Speaker 3>m D capturing market share story or is that just

0:16:57.040 --> 0:16:59.280
<v Speaker 3>a rebound in demand generally story?

0:16:59.360 --> 0:17:01.240
<v Speaker 2>Lisa Well, I.

0:17:01.440 --> 0:17:02.160
<v Speaker 9>Think it's both.

0:17:02.360 --> 0:17:02.480
<v Speaker 10>Ed.

0:17:02.600 --> 0:17:06.320
<v Speaker 8>I think the demand is is good. I think the

0:17:06.359 --> 0:17:10.840
<v Speaker 8>demand patterns are better. But clearly we're very, you know,

0:17:11.000 --> 0:17:13.520
<v Speaker 8>very competitive with our products. I think we have leadership

0:17:13.800 --> 0:17:15.680
<v Speaker 8>CPUs in both.

0:17:15.440 --> 0:17:16.320
<v Speaker 9>Server and client.

0:17:16.880 --> 0:17:20.880
<v Speaker 8>We've shown significant traction in cloud as well as enterprise,

0:17:21.280 --> 0:17:23.240
<v Speaker 8>and I think going forward you're going to see, you know,

0:17:23.440 --> 0:17:27.480
<v Speaker 8>enterprise customers want the best solution out there, and that is.

0:17:27.400 --> 0:17:30.240
<v Speaker 9>You know, a m D for computing and gaming.

0:17:30.600 --> 0:17:34.440
<v Speaker 4>Nisa so Strong. I'm interested into the nuance of pull

0:17:34.520 --> 0:17:36.360
<v Speaker 4>forward because you said on the call that you didn't

0:17:36.359 --> 0:17:38.960
<v Speaker 4>see a whole lot of pull forward. Are people trying

0:17:38.960 --> 0:17:41.560
<v Speaker 4>to get ahead of tarifs and price increases, but did

0:17:41.560 --> 0:17:42.360
<v Speaker 4>you see any.

0:17:43.680 --> 0:17:45.400
<v Speaker 9>You know, very little Caroline.

0:17:45.480 --> 0:17:48.879
<v Speaker 8>I think what we look at mostly is not just

0:17:48.920 --> 0:17:53.280
<v Speaker 8>what we're selling in to customers, but we actually look

0:17:53.320 --> 0:17:56.600
<v Speaker 8>at what's being sold out at end customers, and what

0:17:56.640 --> 0:18:00.240
<v Speaker 8>we're seeing being you know, really transferred to end customers

0:18:00.320 --> 0:18:04.320
<v Speaker 8>is good demand. I mean, people are refreshing their data centers,

0:18:04.680 --> 0:18:06.760
<v Speaker 8>which is very positive. Right We're in a place where

0:18:06.800 --> 0:18:10.760
<v Speaker 8>computing is important, and so we're seeing strong refresh cycles

0:18:11.119 --> 0:18:14.040
<v Speaker 8>on the data center side. We're seeing strong pull through

0:18:14.840 --> 0:18:19.760
<v Speaker 8>of our of our solutions in the enterprise in PC,

0:18:20.560 --> 0:18:22.919
<v Speaker 8>and then from a gaming standpoint, again, we have a

0:18:23.000 --> 0:18:26.240
<v Speaker 8>very strong product cycle. So you know, there's it's always

0:18:26.240 --> 0:18:29.679
<v Speaker 8>hard to tell exactly what the impact of the current

0:18:30.480 --> 0:18:32.800
<v Speaker 8>tariffs are, but I would say that that's the smaller

0:18:32.840 --> 0:18:35.520
<v Speaker 8>part of the impact on our business. The larger part

0:18:35.720 --> 0:18:41.120
<v Speaker 8>is just strong products, you know, very good traction from customers.

0:18:40.840 --> 0:18:42.640
<v Speaker 9>And looking at a stronger second half.

0:18:42.440 --> 0:18:44.680
<v Speaker 4>Of the year, a stronger second half of the year

0:18:44.720 --> 0:18:48.120
<v Speaker 4>where you take some market share from Nvidia, Lisa, how

0:18:48.119 --> 0:18:51.199
<v Speaker 4>are you seeing that grow out and the ability to

0:18:51.240 --> 0:18:52.879
<v Speaker 4>compete with the next ranger chips.

0:18:53.760 --> 0:18:57.800
<v Speaker 8>Well, we are very bullish on our overall roadmap capability.

0:18:58.080 --> 0:19:00.639
<v Speaker 8>I think the second half of the year as a

0:19:00.760 --> 0:19:04.879
<v Speaker 8>number of customers. You're really you're broadly adopting AMD.

0:19:06.680 --> 0:19:09.520
<v Speaker 3>Lisa, I have a question from our audience, if that's okay,

0:19:09.880 --> 0:19:11.960
<v Speaker 3>a viewer of Bloomberg Tech and as you know, like

0:19:12.040 --> 0:19:15.480
<v Speaker 3>loads of AMD employees, your peers, technology industry.

0:19:15.160 --> 0:19:16.680
<v Speaker 2>People want to hear what you have say. I'm just

0:19:16.720 --> 0:19:17.840
<v Speaker 2>going to read it to you.

0:19:17.840 --> 0:19:22.399
<v Speaker 3>Can Lisa, please explain AMD's winning and gaming consoles. But

0:19:22.560 --> 0:19:25.560
<v Speaker 3>AI is where the margins are. Now, what's the plan

0:19:25.640 --> 0:19:29.160
<v Speaker 3>to make a MD indispensable to the next open AI

0:19:29.720 --> 0:19:33.440
<v Speaker 3>and not just cost effective alternative? I think to invideor

0:19:33.520 --> 0:19:35.760
<v Speaker 3>is what they're saying well ed?

0:19:36.240 --> 0:19:38.080
<v Speaker 8>The best way to say that is for you know,

0:19:38.119 --> 0:19:40.240
<v Speaker 8>those of you who know us as a company, you

0:19:40.280 --> 0:19:42.400
<v Speaker 8>know we execute extremely well.

0:19:42.960 --> 0:19:44.680
<v Speaker 9>You know, our roadmaps are strong.

0:19:45.000 --> 0:19:48.520
<v Speaker 8>We're very excited about all of the progress that we've made.

0:19:48.600 --> 0:19:51.040
<v Speaker 8>You know, I three hundred was an excellent product. M

0:19:51.080 --> 0:19:54.080
<v Speaker 8>I three point fifty is you know, a big increase

0:19:54.560 --> 0:19:57.280
<v Speaker 8>above that, and then our next generation is also and

0:19:57.320 --> 0:19:59.879
<v Speaker 8>the key for us, if you look at our history,

0:20:00.000 --> 0:20:03.080
<v Speaker 8>our history is doing what we say we're going to do,

0:20:03.280 --> 0:20:07.200
<v Speaker 8>delivering to customers, delivering total cost of ownership and with that,

0:20:07.640 --> 0:20:09.960
<v Speaker 8>you know, being a great partner, and so from that standpoint,

0:20:10.000 --> 0:20:13.000
<v Speaker 8>I think you can be very confident that we have

0:20:13.040 --> 0:20:14.440
<v Speaker 8>a strong roadmap and we're going to.

0:20:14.359 --> 0:20:15.399
<v Speaker 9>Execute on it well.

0:20:15.720 --> 0:20:20.159
<v Speaker 8>And you know, our largest customers want to have a

0:20:20.240 --> 0:20:22.280
<v Speaker 8>dependable and good partner.

0:20:23.359 --> 0:20:26.959
<v Speaker 4>It's been wonderful spending time with you, Lisa sou Amd CEO.

0:20:27.200 --> 0:20:35.880
<v Speaker 4>We thank you very much time now for talking tech.

0:20:36.000 --> 0:20:38.879
<v Speaker 4>First up, soft Bank shares they're actually higher on the

0:20:38.920 --> 0:20:41.320
<v Speaker 4>news that open Ai is set to sell shares at

0:20:41.320 --> 0:20:45.200
<v Speaker 4>a five hundred billion dollar valuation insider shares. As a company,

0:20:45.200 --> 0:20:46.960
<v Speaker 4>of course it has a big investment in but the

0:20:47.000 --> 0:20:49.960
<v Speaker 4>news reversed an earlier fall in the Japanese company stock

0:20:50.000 --> 0:20:54.280
<v Speaker 4>after it brought to net income that missed analyst expectations. Meanwhile,

0:20:54.280 --> 0:20:57.080
<v Speaker 4>the US has charged two Chinese nationals. We're sending it

0:20:57.200 --> 0:20:59.879
<v Speaker 4>tens of millions of dollars worth of advanced AI chips

0:21:00.119 --> 0:21:03.800
<v Speaker 4>to China, violating export restrictions. Now the defendants allegedly sent

0:21:03.840 --> 0:21:07.680
<v Speaker 4>sensitive technology from Nvidia, including h one hundred AI accelerators.

0:21:07.880 --> 0:21:10.679
<v Speaker 4>Lawyers for the pair couldn't be immediately located for comment.

0:21:11.440 --> 0:21:16.119
<v Speaker 4>And this mountain traversing robot dog is causing shares of

0:21:16.200 --> 0:21:19.720
<v Speaker 4>Chinese robotics companies to climb, but the mechanical dog is

0:21:19.800 --> 0:21:23.440
<v Speaker 4>from startup Unitary. China has been showing off its robotics

0:21:23.440 --> 0:21:27.040
<v Speaker 4>prowess in a lot this year, including with running and

0:21:27.160 --> 0:21:30.240
<v Speaker 4>kickboxing humanoids and a favorite of yours.

0:21:31.040 --> 0:21:36.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, coming up, Matt Romberg, CEO of gaming creation platform Unity,

0:21:36.640 --> 0:21:38.639
<v Speaker 3>going to talk about that company's earnings. We're going to

0:21:38.720 --> 0:21:42.000
<v Speaker 3>talk more about the mobile gaming space, in particular what

0:21:42.080 --> 0:21:45.000
<v Speaker 3>the dev community has been really focused on. This is

0:21:45.000 --> 0:21:56.520
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg Tech. Welcome back to Bloomberg Tech. I'm taking a

0:21:56.560 --> 0:21:59.240
<v Speaker 3>look at AMD largely to just recap the conversation we

0:21:59.359 --> 0:22:01.880
<v Speaker 3>just had with cly to Sue. The stock came off

0:22:01.920 --> 0:22:05.240
<v Speaker 3>session lows during the course of that conversation talking about

0:22:05.240 --> 0:22:08.560
<v Speaker 3>clear demand, particularly from hyperscalers in the AI accelerator market.

0:22:08.880 --> 0:22:11.000
<v Speaker 3>They do think that they can shift some of that

0:22:11.480 --> 0:22:16.280
<v Speaker 3>China specific AI accelerated inventory Carrow that they had written down.

0:22:16.320 --> 0:22:18.800
<v Speaker 3>That's one of the responsors she gave to you. PC

0:22:18.960 --> 0:22:21.680
<v Speaker 3>demand is very strong and they're taking market share. Was

0:22:21.680 --> 0:22:23.919
<v Speaker 3>a very clear signal. We'll continue to track it. It's

0:22:23.960 --> 0:22:27.040
<v Speaker 3>bouncing around a lot going on. Apple continues to push

0:22:27.119 --> 0:22:30.920
<v Speaker 3>higher one hundred billion dollars additional investment in US according

0:22:30.920 --> 0:22:34.240
<v Speaker 3>to the White House later today, we expect to hear more.

0:22:34.400 --> 0:22:36.560
<v Speaker 3>The stock's now up five and a half percent. That's

0:22:36.560 --> 0:22:39.639
<v Speaker 3>a big jump. Shopify is up nineteen and a half percent.

0:22:39.840 --> 0:22:42.919
<v Speaker 3>It's now become Canada's biggest company by market cap. It

0:22:43.000 --> 0:22:46.400
<v Speaker 3>is taking e commerce market share and absolutely barm storming

0:22:46.440 --> 0:22:49.160
<v Speaker 3>print from that company. And then super Micro is down

0:22:49.160 --> 0:22:51.959
<v Speaker 3>twenty one percent. Simple Story told us that in fiscal

0:22:52.000 --> 0:22:56.040
<v Speaker 3>twenty six they would get thirty three billion dollars sorry,

0:22:56.080 --> 0:22:59.720
<v Speaker 3>in sales. They previously told us forty billion. Everyone's going, well,

0:23:00.000 --> 0:23:02.000
<v Speaker 3>what's going on? You know, it's just not as strong

0:23:02.040 --> 0:23:03.320
<v Speaker 3>as they had previously told us.

0:23:03.560 --> 0:23:04.479
<v Speaker 2>We have more ends.

0:23:04.840 --> 0:23:07.680
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, and we've got more big slumps. Actually this time,

0:23:07.760 --> 0:23:11.400
<v Speaker 4>let's check out snapshares plunging after reporting second quarter sales

0:23:11.440 --> 0:23:13.520
<v Speaker 4>that fell short of Wall Street. The expectation said, Look,

0:23:13.640 --> 0:23:16.640
<v Speaker 4>the company blamed a technical issue with its ad buying

0:23:16.680 --> 0:23:19.640
<v Speaker 4>tools that basically set price points too low. The glitch

0:23:19.800 --> 0:23:22.119
<v Speaker 4>has now been fixed. But let's break down the numbers

0:23:22.119 --> 0:23:23.960
<v Speaker 4>of the outlook with jasmin Enberg where poased to welcome

0:23:23.960 --> 0:23:26.560
<v Speaker 4>a back VP and principle analyst and eMarketer. This is

0:23:26.560 --> 0:23:29.600
<v Speaker 4>such a self inflicted wound and the market doesn't seem

0:23:29.640 --> 0:23:31.639
<v Speaker 4>to be well forgiving them for it.

0:23:32.760 --> 0:23:35.520
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, absolutely, I mean it really was a dismal quarter

0:23:35.640 --> 0:23:38.480
<v Speaker 11>for a SNAP, and even before it reported its earnings,

0:23:38.520 --> 0:23:41.320
<v Speaker 11>I was saying that it wasn't looking great for the company,

0:23:41.359 --> 0:23:44.200
<v Speaker 11>and that had less to do with the economic uncertainty

0:23:44.280 --> 0:23:46.359
<v Speaker 11>and tariffs, which of course it had warned about at

0:23:46.400 --> 0:23:48.720
<v Speaker 11>the end of Q one, and more to do with

0:23:49.000 --> 0:23:53.880
<v Speaker 11>foundational structural issues within its AD platform and its ability

0:23:53.920 --> 0:23:57.240
<v Speaker 11>to monetize. Now, I obviously could not have predicted that

0:23:57.280 --> 0:23:59.600
<v Speaker 11>it would have an ad glitch in Q two that

0:23:59.640 --> 0:24:02.560
<v Speaker 11>would result in the deceleration and growth, but I think

0:24:02.600 --> 0:24:06.800
<v Speaker 11>that really does point to these longer term, more deeper

0:24:06.920 --> 0:24:10.760
<v Speaker 11>challenges that it has within its business model. I do

0:24:10.800 --> 0:24:13.439
<v Speaker 11>think in a different context, investors might have been just

0:24:13.520 --> 0:24:17.360
<v Speaker 11>a little bit more forgiving, though probably not much more

0:24:17.400 --> 0:24:20.919
<v Speaker 11>forgiving because they tend to be with Snap. But you know,

0:24:20.960 --> 0:24:23.879
<v Speaker 11>STAP hasn't working very hard for quite some time on

0:24:23.960 --> 0:24:27.439
<v Speaker 11>revamping its AD platform focus really on direct response, and

0:24:27.480 --> 0:24:31.240
<v Speaker 11>I think they're getting frustrated. They're getting impatient because the results,

0:24:31.280 --> 0:24:35.679
<v Speaker 11>while sometimes there's progress, it's mostly been inconsistent. And then

0:24:35.720 --> 0:24:39.119
<v Speaker 11>if you take the larger context of meta and reddits

0:24:39.280 --> 0:24:40.760
<v Speaker 11>blowout earnings.

0:24:40.280 --> 0:24:42.720
<v Speaker 9>For Q two. It makes it really hard.

0:24:42.520 --> 0:24:48.400
<v Speaker 11>For Snap to shift responsibility to macro conditions or headwinds

0:24:48.400 --> 0:24:50.720
<v Speaker 11>and leaves very little room for mistakes.

0:24:50.920 --> 0:24:54.399
<v Speaker 4>I mean, well said, why they consistently deliver is daily

0:24:54.440 --> 0:24:57.480
<v Speaker 4>active users, unless we forget there's almost half a billion

0:24:57.520 --> 0:25:00.520
<v Speaker 4>of them. But what's interesting is they're trying to move

0:25:00.520 --> 0:25:03.199
<v Speaker 4>away perhaps some more volatile ad side of it to

0:25:03.280 --> 0:25:06.440
<v Speaker 4>subscription is that working well.

0:25:06.480 --> 0:25:10.399
<v Speaker 11>Snapchat Plus has been and continues to be a bright

0:25:10.480 --> 0:25:12.679
<v Speaker 11>spot for Snap. And one of the things that that

0:25:12.800 --> 0:25:15.359
<v Speaker 11>says to me is that while Snap still struggles to

0:25:16.240 --> 0:25:20.040
<v Speaker 11>roll out features for advertisers that they like and need,

0:25:20.119 --> 0:25:24.880
<v Speaker 11>they certainly know how to bring features to consumers that

0:25:24.920 --> 0:25:27.560
<v Speaker 11>they like and that they're willing to pay for. I

0:25:27.600 --> 0:25:31.040
<v Speaker 11>do think going forward, diversification of its revenue streams in

0:25:31.040 --> 0:25:33.560
<v Speaker 11>general is just going to be so much more important

0:25:33.600 --> 0:25:36.600
<v Speaker 11>for Snap, and Snapchat Plus continues to drive a lot

0:25:36.640 --> 0:25:41.000
<v Speaker 11>of its revenue growth, especially considering the fact that while

0:25:41.000 --> 0:25:44.280
<v Speaker 11>its monthly active user base showed really strong signs of

0:25:44.320 --> 0:25:47.159
<v Speaker 11>progress in terms of going getting toward that one billion

0:25:47.280 --> 0:25:50.919
<v Speaker 11>dollar or one billion user goal that it has, we

0:25:51.000 --> 0:25:54.080
<v Speaker 11>saw a lot of weakness in North America, which is

0:25:54.119 --> 0:25:58.800
<v Speaker 11>Snap's core market and where it makes most of its money.

0:25:58.840 --> 0:26:00.840
<v Speaker 11>And that also means then that Snap is going to

0:26:00.880 --> 0:26:05.000
<v Speaker 11>be more reliant on international markets going forward to monetize

0:26:05.080 --> 0:26:09.200
<v Speaker 11>via ads, and that's extremely challenging or more challenging because

0:26:09.720 --> 0:26:13.080
<v Speaker 11>it's harder to make money there. And again, the weakness

0:26:13.119 --> 0:26:15.919
<v Speaker 11>in North America points to structural problems.

0:26:16.800 --> 0:26:19.280
<v Speaker 3>Just real quick, I appreciate what you said about the

0:26:19.359 --> 0:26:23.000
<v Speaker 3>response investors have to Snap sometimes, like I just always remember,

0:26:23.040 --> 0:26:24.520
<v Speaker 3>are they going up a lot or down a lot?

0:26:25.440 --> 0:26:28.480
<v Speaker 3>But that speaks to lack of consistency. Like Meta showed

0:26:28.560 --> 0:26:31.639
<v Speaker 3>us that all the stuff they've done around AI shaws

0:26:31.720 --> 0:26:33.200
<v Speaker 3>up the core breading but of business.

0:26:33.560 --> 0:26:35.720
<v Speaker 2>Is Snap not experiencing something similar?

0:26:36.720 --> 0:26:38.720
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, I mean I think Meta showed us that you

0:26:38.720 --> 0:26:41.160
<v Speaker 11>can send a lot of money on AI if your

0:26:41.200 --> 0:26:44.280
<v Speaker 11>core business is doing well, and it truly is. I mean,

0:26:44.320 --> 0:26:49.080
<v Speaker 11>Meta is a powerhouse. It continues to deliver on efficiency

0:26:49.640 --> 0:26:53.119
<v Speaker 11>and effectiveness for advertisers. You know, Snap has been playing

0:26:53.160 --> 0:26:56.520
<v Speaker 11>catch up to Meta in many ways, including in AI.

0:26:56.880 --> 0:26:59.600
<v Speaker 11>You know, it doesn't have the same scale and resources

0:26:59.600 --> 0:27:05.040
<v Speaker 11>that Meta has to build this powerhouse AI driven ad business,

0:27:05.600 --> 0:27:08.720
<v Speaker 11>but it certainly needs to do more work there. One

0:27:08.720 --> 0:27:10.879
<v Speaker 11>thing I will say for Snap though, is you know,

0:27:11.119 --> 0:27:15.560
<v Speaker 11>we saw an increase in SMB advertising small and medium

0:27:15.560 --> 0:27:18.560
<v Speaker 11>sized businesses, and I do think that that is, you know,

0:27:18.680 --> 0:27:22.240
<v Speaker 11>a direct result of its investments in AI in its

0:27:22.240 --> 0:27:25.760
<v Speaker 11>ad platform, because these advertisers are generally drawn to places

0:27:25.800 --> 0:27:29.880
<v Speaker 11>where it's easy to advertise, and that's you know, one

0:27:29.880 --> 0:27:34.159
<v Speaker 11>of the impacts that AI has on advertising and these platforms.

0:27:34.640 --> 0:27:36.840
<v Speaker 3>Jasmine Enberg from me Marketer, thank you so much for

0:27:36.920 --> 0:27:39.159
<v Speaker 3>joining us on the program. Let's stick with earnings and

0:27:39.200 --> 0:27:42.560
<v Speaker 3>get out to gaming. Shares of Unity software actually now

0:27:42.640 --> 0:27:46.200
<v Speaker 3>lower by almost nine percent. Blinking and miss it kind

0:27:46.200 --> 0:27:49.320
<v Speaker 3>of situation. This morning, Caro, the stock had spiked after

0:27:49.320 --> 0:27:52.160
<v Speaker 3>the company reported better than expected second quarter earnings.

0:27:52.400 --> 0:27:53.160
<v Speaker 2>Something's changed.

0:27:53.200 --> 0:27:56.200
<v Speaker 3>Let's talk it through with Unity CEO Matt Brumberg.

0:27:56.960 --> 0:27:58.080
<v Speaker 2>Well, help me.

0:27:58.840 --> 0:28:03.280
<v Speaker 3>There was a good response. You beat expectations. There's particular

0:28:03.280 --> 0:28:05.720
<v Speaker 3>focus for you guys in the mobile gaming market. The

0:28:05.760 --> 0:28:08.280
<v Speaker 3>stock is sort of reverse direction, is down eight percent.

0:28:08.359 --> 0:28:08.600
<v Speaker 5>Matt.

0:28:09.160 --> 0:28:10.359
<v Speaker 2>You'll read on that. Please.

0:28:11.080 --> 0:28:14.080
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, you know we're not stock investors or business builders,

0:28:14.080 --> 0:28:15.680
<v Speaker 12>so you know, my answer to that is a little

0:28:15.720 --> 0:28:18.439
<v Speaker 12>bit of who knows what we're really focused on is

0:28:18.720 --> 0:28:21.280
<v Speaker 12>building or growing and during business. And I think that

0:28:21.600 --> 0:28:24.840
<v Speaker 12>when we look back on the second quarter twenty twenty five,

0:28:24.920 --> 0:28:26.439
<v Speaker 12>the history is going to show that it was an

0:28:26.440 --> 0:28:30.200
<v Speaker 12>inflection point for our turnaround, sort of the time when

0:28:30.600 --> 0:28:34.639
<v Speaker 12>accelerated product development and delivering more for customers started to

0:28:34.720 --> 0:28:37.280
<v Speaker 12>show up in a really meaningful way in our business.

0:28:37.760 --> 0:28:39.400
<v Speaker 13>And I think that's basically where we are.

0:28:40.520 --> 0:28:42.480
<v Speaker 3>I really appreciate having you on the show. I take

0:28:42.520 --> 0:28:45.520
<v Speaker 3>a lot of interest in Unity because we recently have roadblocks.

0:28:45.560 --> 0:28:48.200
<v Speaker 3>CEO David Zooki on the show of their own Earnings

0:28:48.320 --> 0:28:51.280
<v Speaker 3>is probably more analogous in the gaming space to put

0:28:51.280 --> 0:28:54.760
<v Speaker 3>you nearer to a roadblock. Maybe you disagree, but mobile

0:28:54.800 --> 0:28:57.640
<v Speaker 3>gaming right now is a huge focus. How is that

0:28:57.680 --> 0:29:02.640
<v Speaker 3>a driver for your business and a prioritype It's.

0:29:02.440 --> 0:29:03.840
<v Speaker 13>The biggest priority there is.

0:29:03.880 --> 0:29:07.840
<v Speaker 12>We're effectively the operating system for the mobile gaming business. Globally,

0:29:08.960 --> 0:29:11.200
<v Speaker 12>seventy percent of the mobile games in the world are

0:29:11.200 --> 0:29:13.400
<v Speaker 12>built on Unity, and eighty five of the top one

0:29:13.440 --> 0:29:17.680
<v Speaker 12>hundred advertisers mobile game advertisers advertise with us. So what

0:29:17.680 --> 0:29:20.520
<v Speaker 12>we've really seen in the last year or so of

0:29:20.560 --> 0:29:23.920
<v Speaker 12>this turnaround is that when we make fundamental investments in

0:29:24.000 --> 0:29:27.360
<v Speaker 12>delivering better product for that set of customers for the

0:29:27.400 --> 0:29:31.320
<v Speaker 12>mobile gaming business. That our business is lifting, and we've

0:29:31.320 --> 0:29:35.200
<v Speaker 12>really seen that over the year, and we're actually really

0:29:35.280 --> 0:29:38.160
<v Speaker 12>excited about investor reaction over the course of the year

0:29:38.200 --> 0:29:38.600
<v Speaker 12>as well.

0:29:39.160 --> 0:29:41.200
<v Speaker 4>I'm going to go back to perhaps the stock reaction

0:29:41.320 --> 0:29:43.760
<v Speaker 4>and what our own bloombag intelligence analysts have been saying

0:29:43.800 --> 0:29:48.880
<v Speaker 4>that and forgive me, it's not always bathed in positivity

0:29:48.920 --> 0:29:51.360
<v Speaker 4>because they say, look, this is a cuerential decline of

0:29:51.400 --> 0:29:54.360
<v Speaker 4>your Create segment in the next quarter that suggests muted

0:29:54.400 --> 0:29:59.040
<v Speaker 4>adoption of your Unity six offering. Just describe that. Is

0:29:59.080 --> 0:30:00.800
<v Speaker 4>that something you're seeing seeing, Jenna.

0:30:00.720 --> 0:30:03.400
<v Speaker 13>I started, I think that's just incorrect.

0:30:04.640 --> 0:30:08.160
<v Speaker 12>UNI six is the fast most the fastest adoption of

0:30:08.200 --> 0:30:09.800
<v Speaker 12>any version of you we've ever seen.

0:30:10.080 --> 0:30:13.040
<v Speaker 13>It's the most stable, it's the most performant. So we've

0:30:13.080 --> 0:30:14.480
<v Speaker 13>been really really pleased by that.

0:30:15.600 --> 0:30:19.640
<v Speaker 12>Again, you're drawing into wondering about the stock I would

0:30:19.680 --> 0:30:21.320
<v Speaker 12>just tell you it's much more likely to be the

0:30:21.320 --> 0:30:23.600
<v Speaker 12>one hundred plus percent run up over the past year

0:30:23.840 --> 0:30:28.000
<v Speaker 12>in anticipation what are sharply better results, and again it's

0:30:28.480 --> 0:30:30.400
<v Speaker 12>a kind of inflection point in our business.

0:30:31.360 --> 0:30:33.080
<v Speaker 13>I would guess that has some more to do with those.

0:30:32.960 --> 0:30:36.040
<v Speaker 4>Dynams love that context, Matt, give us the context of

0:30:36.120 --> 0:30:39.240
<v Speaker 4>the ad space, and you're encroaching a bit more on

0:30:39.280 --> 0:30:41.960
<v Speaker 4>app love in space for example, how do you compete?

0:30:42.000 --> 0:30:44.480
<v Speaker 4>How you seeing your self take market share or indeed

0:30:44.480 --> 0:30:46.560
<v Speaker 4>app love and still being a really strong competitor.

0:30:47.160 --> 0:30:49.640
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, we don't really think about market share in this business.

0:30:49.880 --> 0:30:53.840
<v Speaker 12>The way this business works is performance based. Mobile advertisers

0:30:54.160 --> 0:30:57.560
<v Speaker 12>buy performance and they buy against their rows, their return

0:30:57.600 --> 0:31:00.600
<v Speaker 12>on investment targets, and they will buy infinitely across that

0:31:00.760 --> 0:31:01.720
<v Speaker 12>efficient frontier.

0:31:01.880 --> 0:31:03.440
<v Speaker 13>So as we deliver.

0:31:03.200 --> 0:31:06.520
<v Speaker 12>More value, customers will spend more money with us, and

0:31:06.560 --> 0:31:07.560
<v Speaker 12>our business will grow.

0:31:07.760 --> 0:31:11.200
<v Speaker 13>And that's what's happening. This is a big.

0:31:11.160 --> 0:31:14.400
<v Speaker 12>Competitive space with some of the largest, most competitive players

0:31:14.880 --> 0:31:17.520
<v Speaker 12>in the world operating in it, and we're really excited

0:31:17.560 --> 0:31:20.760
<v Speaker 12>about our ability to compete and not just now but

0:31:20.800 --> 0:31:21.400
<v Speaker 12>in the future.

0:31:22.480 --> 0:31:24.440
<v Speaker 3>I'd love to end by talking just very quickly about

0:31:24.480 --> 0:31:26.960
<v Speaker 3>developers and the creator community. Like one of the big

0:31:27.000 --> 0:31:30.280
<v Speaker 3>issues in the end market the app store, Apple or

0:31:30.360 --> 0:31:33.560
<v Speaker 3>Google is revenue split and just what you're doing to

0:31:33.640 --> 0:31:37.080
<v Speaker 3>incentivize the creators, but also like bring everyone with you

0:31:37.120 --> 0:31:38.320
<v Speaker 3>if you're growing at that click.

0:31:39.640 --> 0:31:39.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:31:39.880 --> 0:31:43.440
<v Speaker 12>I mean, we are the tools that those folks use

0:31:43.560 --> 0:31:47.200
<v Speaker 12>to build their experiences and then operate those business for

0:31:47.360 --> 0:31:51.240
<v Speaker 12>years and years in life service. So when we deliver better,

0:31:51.320 --> 0:31:53.840
<v Speaker 12>more effective tools, for example, to your point, to help

0:31:53.880 --> 0:31:57.080
<v Speaker 12>them monetize commerce in a native way, for example, and

0:31:57.200 --> 0:32:01.000
<v Speaker 12>help them acquire users more efficiently, and that business grows.

0:32:01.080 --> 0:32:03.160
<v Speaker 13>So we're a partner in that growth.

0:32:02.920 --> 0:32:06.920
<v Speaker 4>With them at Bromberg, CEO of Unity, it's great to

0:32:06.960 --> 0:32:07.760
<v Speaker 4>have some time with you.

0:32:14.800 --> 0:32:17.560
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg's reporting that open ai is in talks for a

0:32:17.600 --> 0:32:21.560
<v Speaker 3>potential share sale for current and former employees that would

0:32:21.560 --> 0:32:25.520
<v Speaker 3>put the company at a five hundred billion dollar valuation.

0:32:26.440 --> 0:32:27.600
<v Speaker 2>That's the chart right there.

0:32:28.520 --> 0:32:32.200
<v Speaker 3>The move would boost open AI's price tag, according to sources,

0:32:32.240 --> 0:32:33.720
<v Speaker 3>which is previously at three.

0:32:33.600 --> 0:32:34.440
<v Speaker 2>Hundred billion dollars.

0:32:34.480 --> 0:32:38.720
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg's Shringafari broke the story and it's with us now.

0:32:38.920 --> 0:32:41.720
<v Speaker 3>The mechanism actually doesn't even really matter. It's an insider

0:32:41.720 --> 0:32:45.080
<v Speaker 3>share sale that sets this valuation of five hundred billion dollars.

0:32:45.320 --> 0:32:47.240
<v Speaker 3>But it feels like just yesterday that we broke the

0:32:47.280 --> 0:32:51.160
<v Speaker 3>story on the last three hundred billion dollar valuation. Tell

0:32:51.240 --> 0:32:53.200
<v Speaker 3>us about the jump, tell us about what we're hearing

0:32:53.200 --> 0:32:54.440
<v Speaker 3>from sources is going on.

0:32:56.400 --> 0:32:59.320
<v Speaker 14>Yeah, I mean it's a significant jump in valuation, more

0:32:59.360 --> 0:33:02.760
<v Speaker 14>than two thirds of the last price tag, you know,

0:33:02.800 --> 0:33:06.000
<v Speaker 14>the last round that we reported on finalized in March,

0:33:06.080 --> 0:33:10.520
<v Speaker 14>led by soft Bank. Since then, we've seen strong user

0:33:10.560 --> 0:33:14.040
<v Speaker 14>and revenue growth as we've reported, but again, this price

0:33:14.120 --> 0:33:16.440
<v Speaker 14>tag would put open a eye in a new league

0:33:16.480 --> 0:33:20.480
<v Speaker 14>as one of the most highly valued private companies out there.

0:33:21.240 --> 0:33:22.320
<v Speaker 9>If this sale were to go.

0:33:22.320 --> 0:33:27.080
<v Speaker 4>Through, extraordinary. How it eclipses even the owner of TikTok

0:33:27.280 --> 0:33:30.040
<v Speaker 4>over in China and well ahead of close second is

0:33:30.040 --> 0:33:32.440
<v Speaker 4>sort of SpaceX here in the US. What's interesting is

0:33:32.440 --> 0:33:34.960
<v Speaker 4>we're getting so many updates to the product itself for

0:33:35.080 --> 0:33:37.320
<v Speaker 4>the world as well, Shoen. We're seeing how they're getting

0:33:37.320 --> 0:33:41.640
<v Speaker 4>in offering chatchipt to federal offerings with just one dollar.

0:33:41.680 --> 0:33:43.480
<v Speaker 4>They're trying to open source a little bit more. Does

0:33:43.520 --> 0:33:45.680
<v Speaker 4>this just build up the idea that this is going

0:33:45.760 --> 0:33:47.040
<v Speaker 4>to be the winner?

0:33:48.680 --> 0:33:50.480
<v Speaker 14>I think it's still too early to say in the

0:33:50.480 --> 0:33:53.880
<v Speaker 14>AGI race, who, if anyone, will be the definitive winner,

0:33:53.880 --> 0:33:56.360
<v Speaker 14>but I will say this is an This has always

0:33:56.400 --> 0:34:00.560
<v Speaker 14>been a rapidly moving field, and I think the past

0:34:00.600 --> 0:34:05.000
<v Speaker 14>few months have been especially fast. We are seeing new

0:34:05.080 --> 0:34:08.480
<v Speaker 14>releases from open Ai this week. We have the open

0:34:08.520 --> 0:34:11.960
<v Speaker 14>Source model that just dropped, and it's widely expected that

0:34:12.000 --> 0:34:15.879
<v Speaker 14>their more major model update, GPT five is coming soon.

0:34:16.680 --> 0:34:18.120
<v Speaker 14>On top of that, you know, if you look to

0:34:18.640 --> 0:34:21.080
<v Speaker 14>the left and right, we have Anthropic also released an

0:34:21.120 --> 0:34:24.960
<v Speaker 14>update to its model, also in talks to have a

0:34:25.000 --> 0:34:28.280
<v Speaker 14>new round of funding that would more than double their

0:34:28.360 --> 0:34:30.640
<v Speaker 14>past valuation from just earlier this year.

0:34:31.040 --> 0:34:32.080
<v Speaker 9>So I think this is.

0:34:32.360 --> 0:34:36.400
<v Speaker 14>Really a sign that the ai market continues to grow,

0:34:36.520 --> 0:34:39.920
<v Speaker 14>and it does raise questions about are these valuations justified?

0:34:39.960 --> 0:34:42.080
<v Speaker 14>And I think that depends on how bullish you are

0:34:42.760 --> 0:34:44.360
<v Speaker 14>on the genai market as a whole.

0:34:45.200 --> 0:34:47.880
<v Speaker 3>Sharen, reading your report, there's a lot of detail here.

0:34:48.239 --> 0:34:51.280
<v Speaker 3>I mean, for one important point is we understand why

0:34:51.880 --> 0:34:54.520
<v Speaker 3>open ai is doing this right with the secondary The

0:34:54.600 --> 0:34:57.640
<v Speaker 3>timing is because the talent wars and Sam Altman has

0:34:57.680 --> 0:34:59.800
<v Speaker 3>this workforce that he has to keep happy.

0:35:01.480 --> 0:35:04.520
<v Speaker 14>Right, So, as we reported, one of the reasons why

0:35:05.080 --> 0:35:08.440
<v Speaker 14>Opening Eye wants to do this secondary share cal wight

0:35:08.560 --> 0:35:11.520
<v Speaker 14>makes sense is that it gives employees an opportunity to

0:35:12.560 --> 0:35:16.680
<v Speaker 14>essentially cash out. If you're working at Meta, which is

0:35:16.800 --> 0:35:19.799
<v Speaker 14>aggressively By the way, there's this fierce talent war going

0:35:19.840 --> 0:35:23.440
<v Speaker 14>on right now right and Meta has poached several prominent

0:35:23.480 --> 0:35:27.839
<v Speaker 14>open ai employees if they want to retain these employees.

0:35:28.360 --> 0:35:31.440
<v Speaker 14>You know, people want to be able to liquidate their

0:35:32.000 --> 0:35:35.440
<v Speaker 14>shares and this provides current informer employees a potential way

0:35:35.480 --> 0:35:35.759
<v Speaker 14>to do that.

0:35:36.480 --> 0:35:39.560
<v Speaker 4>Sharan KAfari, thanks so much for the update on open Ai.

0:35:39.760 --> 0:35:42.120
<v Speaker 4>Now let's get back to the public markets where Uber

0:35:42.239 --> 0:35:44.279
<v Speaker 4>is already out with its earnings, but after the bell

0:35:44.320 --> 0:35:46.880
<v Speaker 4>we get plenty more Lyft, Door, Dash, Airbnb. There is

0:35:46.960 --> 0:35:50.719
<v Speaker 4>one woman who covers them all, Natalie Lung. You've got

0:35:50.719 --> 0:35:52.719
<v Speaker 4>a busy day. Let's talk about Uber because it's actually

0:35:52.760 --> 0:35:55.120
<v Speaker 4>trading lower. Is that more about how father shares had

0:35:55.200 --> 0:35:57.400
<v Speaker 4>run into this or the worry about sort of the

0:35:57.480 --> 0:35:59.960
<v Speaker 4>spending or capex on autonomous here.

0:36:00.080 --> 0:36:02.960
<v Speaker 10>It's a little bit of both. Definitely, there's a lot

0:36:03.000 --> 0:36:07.040
<v Speaker 10>of excitement going into the earnings today, which was mostly

0:36:07.120 --> 0:36:09.680
<v Speaker 10>a beat, But there was a small miss in the

0:36:09.719 --> 0:36:13.000
<v Speaker 10>core ride share business by Uber, and that was really

0:36:13.080 --> 0:36:15.520
<v Speaker 10>offset by the strong performance of the delivery units.

0:36:15.560 --> 0:36:17.960
<v Speaker 9>So there's a lot for us to look at.

0:36:17.960 --> 0:36:21.640
<v Speaker 10>In terms of what it means for consumer spending and investors.

0:36:21.719 --> 0:36:24.600
<v Speaker 10>Was also excited to hear more about the autonomous strategy

0:36:25.080 --> 0:36:25.640
<v Speaker 10>in the company.

0:36:25.640 --> 0:36:28.000
<v Speaker 3>It's a twenty four hour period that's like the super

0:36:28.040 --> 0:36:30.960
<v Speaker 3>Bowl for Natalie Lung. In the gig economy and at

0:36:31.080 --> 0:36:34.680
<v Speaker 3>based tech company space, you're super busy, as Karen said,

0:36:34.920 --> 0:36:37.080
<v Speaker 3>But what always happens You get Uber and then you

0:36:37.120 --> 0:36:39.839
<v Speaker 3>get Lyft. And there's obviously some read across. What are

0:36:39.880 --> 0:36:42.439
<v Speaker 3>the expectations for the smaller of the two.

0:36:43.800 --> 0:36:47.040
<v Speaker 10>For Lift, they're still expected to post double digit growth

0:36:47.080 --> 0:36:49.640
<v Speaker 10>in the key metric of gross bookings and for this

0:36:49.800 --> 0:36:52.200
<v Speaker 10>quarter in particular, we want to look at the third

0:36:52.280 --> 0:36:55.160
<v Speaker 10>quarter outlook because it's the first time they're including the

0:36:55.200 --> 0:36:59.680
<v Speaker 10>free Now business, which they completed the acquisition last week,

0:36:59.719 --> 0:37:05.120
<v Speaker 10>and that will add business from new European markets such

0:37:05.120 --> 0:37:08.560
<v Speaker 10>as UK and Germany. So that is something of interest

0:37:08.680 --> 0:37:09.040
<v Speaker 10>for me.

0:37:09.000 --> 0:37:12.840
<v Speaker 4>Today doing in Europe and Germany and more broadly expansion

0:37:12.920 --> 0:37:14.680
<v Speaker 4>their DoorDash has been making a bit of m and

0:37:14.760 --> 0:37:17.080
<v Speaker 4>a over in the UK. It shares been on a

0:37:17.120 --> 0:37:19.840
<v Speaker 4>tear this year, up fifty three percent. Where do we

0:37:19.880 --> 0:37:21.480
<v Speaker 4>expect numbers for that company to go?

0:37:21.719 --> 0:37:25.760
<v Speaker 10>Yeah. Similarly, on the back of Uber's very strong delivery results,

0:37:25.800 --> 0:37:29.800
<v Speaker 10>DoorDash is also expected to post nearly twenty percent growth

0:37:29.840 --> 0:37:33.279
<v Speaker 10>on that top line as well. Their delivery deal has

0:37:33.280 --> 0:37:36.720
<v Speaker 10>not closed yet, so might not be seeing those results

0:37:36.719 --> 0:37:40.319
<v Speaker 10>there yet, but pretty strong spending on the US side

0:37:40.480 --> 0:37:41.120
<v Speaker 10>is expected.

0:37:42.040 --> 0:37:45.840
<v Speaker 3>Let's complete the grand slam, the complete sweep and do Airbnb.

0:37:46.600 --> 0:37:47.960
<v Speaker 2>What are you looking for in that name?

0:37:48.520 --> 0:37:52.000
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, it's again. It's a first quarter where we'll see

0:37:52.120 --> 0:37:58.400
<v Speaker 10>results from their newly relaunched Experiences and a Lacarte services business,

0:37:58.640 --> 0:38:02.719
<v Speaker 10>which Branchaskey has said would add one billion in analyzed

0:38:02.760 --> 0:38:05.520
<v Speaker 10>revenue for the company. So we will see the first

0:38:05.600 --> 0:38:08.920
<v Speaker 10>results from there, as well as a broader sentiment on

0:38:09.440 --> 0:38:10.120
<v Speaker 10>US travel.

0:38:11.640 --> 0:38:13.560
<v Speaker 3>One question I'd have is how does Natalie Lung do

0:38:13.680 --> 0:38:16.880
<v Speaker 3>all of those earnings at the same time. Bloomberg's Natalie

0:38:16.920 --> 0:38:19.240
<v Speaker 3>Lung busy evening for you ahead, Thank you very much.

0:38:26.120 --> 0:38:26.359
<v Speaker 2>Okay.

0:38:26.400 --> 0:38:28.719
<v Speaker 3>Apple shares are on the screen, and we're pushing towards

0:38:28.920 --> 0:38:32.920
<v Speaker 3>session highs, up almost six percent now following the announcement

0:38:32.960 --> 0:38:35.920
<v Speaker 3>that the White House says the iPhone maker will invest

0:38:35.960 --> 0:38:39.480
<v Speaker 3>an additional one hundred billion dollars in the United States,

0:38:39.480 --> 0:38:42.160
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg's senior executive editor for Tech, Tom.

0:38:42.080 --> 0:38:42.800
<v Speaker 2>Jarles, is here.

0:38:43.120 --> 0:38:46.399
<v Speaker 3>It's a big number in isolation, sort of but it's

0:38:46.400 --> 0:38:47.880
<v Speaker 3>also got to be taken in aggregate.

0:38:48.520 --> 0:38:49.160
<v Speaker 9>Absolutely.

0:38:49.560 --> 0:38:53.560
<v Speaker 15>Look, Apple spends a lot on these types of initiatives

0:38:53.719 --> 0:38:56.680
<v Speaker 15>all the time. They have already been planning to spend

0:38:57.040 --> 0:39:01.200
<v Speaker 15>hundreds of billions of dollars in the coming years. The

0:39:01.200 --> 0:39:06.840
<v Speaker 15>Trump administration likes big, round, big honkin numbers, right, and

0:39:07.000 --> 0:39:11.120
<v Speaker 15>this is a way for them to say, we've scored

0:39:11.120 --> 0:39:14.800
<v Speaker 15>a victory. We are bringing manufacturing back to the United States.

0:39:15.200 --> 0:39:19.439
<v Speaker 15>On Apple's part, making these pledges, throwing these numbers out there,

0:39:19.480 --> 0:39:22.239
<v Speaker 15>and again, these are plans that this is money that

0:39:22.280 --> 0:39:24.600
<v Speaker 15>they do plan to spend. This is a good way

0:39:24.640 --> 0:39:28.160
<v Speaker 15>for them to as as BI analysts have said so eloquently,

0:39:28.640 --> 0:39:32.360
<v Speaker 15>softened dampen Trump's ire because they still do have a

0:39:32.400 --> 0:39:35.280
<v Speaker 15>lot of their supply chain outside of the United States.

0:39:35.360 --> 0:39:38.440
<v Speaker 15>Trump administration wants to say big US corporations are bringing

0:39:38.440 --> 0:39:41.160
<v Speaker 15>manufacturing back to the United States. This is the question

0:39:41.200 --> 0:39:43.520
<v Speaker 15>that we need to ask, and we will be asking

0:39:43.640 --> 0:39:47.279
<v Speaker 15>in the coming months and weeks, and that is how

0:39:47.360 --> 0:39:50.600
<v Speaker 15>much of real production of the iPhone, how much of

0:39:51.000 --> 0:39:56.600
<v Speaker 15>Apple's high end products is actually going to come to

0:39:56.719 --> 0:40:00.840
<v Speaker 15>the United States versus China, versus India. That's the real question,

0:40:01.320 --> 0:40:03.920
<v Speaker 15>Or is it stuff around the edges, And that's a

0:40:04.000 --> 0:40:05.920
<v Speaker 15>question that we're going to be asking Apple to and

0:40:06.200 --> 0:40:07.520
<v Speaker 15>a lot of other people are going to be asking

0:40:07.560 --> 0:40:09.040
<v Speaker 15>Apple in the coming weeks.

0:40:09.120 --> 0:40:11.960
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, because Tom, the five hundred billion thus far that

0:40:12.000 --> 0:40:15.440
<v Speaker 4>had already been announced, well, that was more about servers,

0:40:15.480 --> 0:40:18.200
<v Speaker 4>that was actually about training, and that was in some

0:40:18.280 --> 0:40:20.080
<v Speaker 4>ways we saw a little bit of the chunk of change.

0:40:20.080 --> 0:40:22.400
<v Speaker 4>I think it was about five million being allocated to

0:40:22.400 --> 0:40:25.080
<v Speaker 4>actually some rare earths as well. What are we actually

0:40:25.120 --> 0:40:27.400
<v Speaker 4>anticipating as to how much, if any, can really be

0:40:27.480 --> 0:40:28.359
<v Speaker 4>for the iPhone?

0:40:28.840 --> 0:40:29.040
<v Speaker 6>Right?

0:40:29.080 --> 0:40:31.920
<v Speaker 15>And some of this is also them committing to purchasing

0:40:31.960 --> 0:40:34.839
<v Speaker 15>more from US suppliers. Again, this is part of their

0:40:34.840 --> 0:40:37.840
<v Speaker 15>supply chain. They need these parts, they will be spending this,

0:40:38.200 --> 0:40:41.480
<v Speaker 15>But will this be creating lots of jobs? Will people

0:40:41.520 --> 0:40:48.600
<v Speaker 15>be manufacturing assembling these products in the US? Time will tell. Again,

0:40:48.719 --> 0:40:52.800
<v Speaker 15>these companies like to they've already been planning to spend

0:40:52.840 --> 0:40:55.200
<v Speaker 15>a lot of money and they're putting lots of big

0:40:55.280 --> 0:40:58.600
<v Speaker 15>round numbers around them. And again it's an opportunity for

0:40:58.640 --> 0:41:02.320
<v Speaker 15>the Trump administration to claim victory. But if you're talking

0:41:02.360 --> 0:41:07.920
<v Speaker 15>about server farms, if you're talking about buying from US manufacturers.

0:41:08.160 --> 0:41:11.440
<v Speaker 15>If you're talking about training facilities, there's a big delta

0:41:11.560 --> 0:41:16.279
<v Speaker 15>between that and actually putting together, piecing together these high

0:41:16.360 --> 0:41:21.480
<v Speaker 15>end devices and moving that supply chain out of India

0:41:21.520 --> 0:41:24.759
<v Speaker 15>and out of China. Look, it's in Apple's interest to

0:41:24.920 --> 0:41:27.759
<v Speaker 15>diversify their supply chain. No one is doubting that. So

0:41:27.920 --> 0:41:30.040
<v Speaker 15>much of it is relying on China and that really

0:41:30.040 --> 0:41:33.120
<v Speaker 15>bit them and a lot of other people, you know

0:41:33.160 --> 0:41:36.560
<v Speaker 15>where during the pandemic and they really need to kind

0:41:36.600 --> 0:41:37.839
<v Speaker 15>of diversify away from that.

0:41:38.920 --> 0:41:42.840
<v Speaker 4>President Trump doesn't particularly what I'm only diversifying into India.

0:41:42.960 --> 0:41:45.719
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg's Tom Jiles, great to have you. Thank you for

0:41:45.760 --> 0:41:47.760
<v Speaker 4>the analysis that does it even this edition of Blomberg

0:41:47.880 --> 0:41:48.959
<v Speaker 4>Tech and what a show.

0:41:49.719 --> 0:41:52.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and jokes aside, like it's a really heavy earnings period.

0:41:52.760 --> 0:41:54.719
<v Speaker 3>Still we move from the megacaps, but there's a lot

0:41:54.760 --> 0:41:56.920
<v Speaker 3>of names giving numbers. We're learning a lot about the

0:41:56.920 --> 0:41:59.440
<v Speaker 3>world of technology. Recap it on the podcast. You know

0:41:59.440 --> 0:42:01.839
<v Speaker 3>where to find it on the Bloomberg terminal, as well

0:42:01.840 --> 0:42:06.200
<v Speaker 3>as online on Apple, Spotify and iHeart from San Francisco and.

0:42:06.280 --> 0:42:08.879
<v Speaker 2>New York City. This is Bloomberg Tech.