WEBVTT - Robot Love

0:00:00.160 --> 0:00:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Brought to you by Toyota. Let's go places. Welcome to

0:00:07.400 --> 0:00:15.400
<v Speaker 1>Forward Thinking, either everybody, and welcome to Forward Thinking, the

0:00:15.440 --> 0:00:18.040
<v Speaker 1>podcast that looks at the future and says, a mechanical

0:00:18.079 --> 0:00:20.439
<v Speaker 1>brain and a mechanical heart. My reflex is good and

0:00:20.520 --> 0:00:23.160
<v Speaker 1>my vision is sharp, but I'm still missing one critical part,

0:00:23.360 --> 0:00:27.760
<v Speaker 1>and it's you. I'm Jonathan Strickland and I'm Joe McCormick,

0:00:27.880 --> 0:00:30.680
<v Speaker 1>and uh, you know, guys, Uh, I don't know if

0:00:30.720 --> 0:00:33.760
<v Speaker 1>you if you actually saw the episode of Forward Thinking

0:00:33.960 --> 0:00:37.600
<v Speaker 1>that I did for Valentine's Day, but um, you know,

0:00:37.680 --> 0:00:40.519
<v Speaker 1>love was in the air. I saw it, did you, Yeah?

0:00:40.920 --> 0:00:44.239
<v Speaker 1>I was. That was a fun one, talking about the

0:00:44.320 --> 0:00:48.199
<v Speaker 1>concepts of romance and love, the future of it, and

0:00:48.520 --> 0:00:52.840
<v Speaker 1>especially the future as it relates to artificial intelligence and robots.

0:00:53.440 --> 0:00:55.960
<v Speaker 1>So I think we should try to do our best

0:00:56.040 --> 0:00:59.040
<v Speaker 1>to bring as much dignity as possible to this discussion

0:00:59.160 --> 0:01:03.840
<v Speaker 1>and not let it just devolve into t he and uh, well,

0:01:03.880 --> 0:01:06.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's it's there's a lot of there's a

0:01:06.520 --> 0:01:10.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of uh, really challenging things to tackle here on

0:01:10.319 --> 0:01:14.240
<v Speaker 1>multiple levels, from a technology standpoint, from a social standpoint,

0:01:14.280 --> 0:01:17.840
<v Speaker 1>from a cultural standpoint. I mean, there are you know,

0:01:18.040 --> 0:01:20.880
<v Speaker 1>First of all, we have to keep in mind, bottom level,

0:01:21.360 --> 0:01:24.840
<v Speaker 1>there are very real people with real emotions that are

0:01:24.880 --> 0:01:28.399
<v Speaker 1>are all wrapped up in this topic. And so it's

0:01:28.480 --> 0:01:31.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're gonna try and be respectful of everybody,

0:01:31.560 --> 0:01:33.280
<v Speaker 1>but at the same time, you have to admit that

0:01:33.400 --> 0:01:36.160
<v Speaker 1>some of the concepts we're talking about to the average

0:01:36.200 --> 0:01:40.200
<v Speaker 1>person might seem really alien to them or even ridiculous.

0:01:40.240 --> 0:01:43.760
<v Speaker 1>And and we're we're absolutely not trying to mock anyone

0:01:43.959 --> 0:01:47.880
<v Speaker 1>who who has, you know, these sort of feelings exactly.

0:01:47.960 --> 0:01:50.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's it's we're trying, Like I said, being

0:01:50.600 --> 0:01:52.360
<v Speaker 1>respectful is going to be one of those things we're

0:01:52.360 --> 0:01:54.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna try and do throughout here. That doesn't mean we're

0:01:54.560 --> 0:01:57.000
<v Speaker 1>not going to make a joke here and there, because

0:01:57.280 --> 0:01:59.160
<v Speaker 1>we are who we are, all of us are a

0:01:59.200 --> 0:02:02.680
<v Speaker 1>little bit. But it's more about being lighthearted. We're not

0:02:02.800 --> 0:02:05.480
<v Speaker 1>poking fun at anyone. Now. First of all, this is

0:02:05.520 --> 0:02:09.840
<v Speaker 1>a concept that is often used in lots of science fiction.

0:02:09.919 --> 0:02:13.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we've seen various films and stories as well

0:02:13.639 --> 0:02:17.680
<v Speaker 1>as uh, you know, television series, everything that you can

0:02:17.720 --> 0:02:22.799
<v Speaker 1>think of that have explored this idea of a human

0:02:22.880 --> 0:02:26.480
<v Speaker 1>person falling in love with a synthetic being. Oh yeah,

0:02:26.480 --> 0:02:29.120
<v Speaker 1>it's a it's a really classic troop um. It goes

0:02:29.160 --> 0:02:32.080
<v Speaker 1>back at least to Heleno Lloyd, which is a short

0:02:32.120 --> 0:02:35.400
<v Speaker 1>story by one Lester del Rey or Bradberry's Marionettes, inc.

0:02:35.400 --> 0:02:38.600
<v Speaker 1>From Yeah, I even go further back because if you

0:02:38.639 --> 0:02:43.000
<v Speaker 1>look at at Mythology and you look at Ovid's Metamorphoses,

0:02:43.320 --> 0:02:46.280
<v Speaker 1>the story of Pygmalion is very similar to kind of

0:02:46.280 --> 0:02:48.960
<v Speaker 1>the stuff we're talking about, and that Pigmalion, a sculptor,

0:02:49.360 --> 0:02:52.600
<v Speaker 1>builds a statue and he falls in love with his creation,

0:02:52.960 --> 0:02:56.880
<v Speaker 1>which is eventually given life by the goddess Aphrodite. And

0:02:57.000 --> 0:02:59.840
<v Speaker 1>so this is not that different from what we're going

0:02:59.840 --> 0:03:02.280
<v Speaker 1>to talking about. You go even further back than that.

0:03:02.320 --> 0:03:05.960
<v Speaker 1>There's a weird science right, Yeah, that predates all of

0:03:05.960 --> 0:03:10.000
<v Speaker 1>its metamorphoses because that was in the eighties and everything

0:03:10.080 --> 0:03:12.960
<v Speaker 1>came after that, or just this year that that movie

0:03:13.000 --> 0:03:15.600
<v Speaker 1>her Spike Jones short came out yep, yep. And so

0:03:15.639 --> 0:03:17.480
<v Speaker 1>there are a lot of different choices that we could

0:03:17.720 --> 0:03:20.959
<v Speaker 1>you know, I actually listed one, uh making Mr Wright,

0:03:21.320 --> 0:03:23.280
<v Speaker 1>which was I don't know, did you guys ever see

0:03:23.280 --> 0:03:26.880
<v Speaker 1>that movie? Okay, this is one of those movies that

0:03:26.960 --> 0:03:31.239
<v Speaker 1>I just remember coming on television all the time, like

0:03:31.320 --> 0:03:34.320
<v Speaker 1>in the maybe it was the late eighties or perhaps

0:03:34.360 --> 0:03:38.440
<v Speaker 1>the early nineties, and it started John Malkovich as a

0:03:38.520 --> 0:03:41.960
<v Speaker 1>scientist who builds a robot, and the robot's purpose is

0:03:42.000 --> 0:03:46.440
<v Speaker 1>to be sent out for into the outer Solar System

0:03:46.520 --> 0:03:51.680
<v Speaker 1>to do you know, uh, astronomical studies. But a woman

0:03:51.800 --> 0:03:53.840
<v Speaker 1>ends up falling in love with the robot, and the

0:03:53.960 --> 0:03:57.920
<v Speaker 1>robot ends up developing emotions. It's already artificially intelligent, but

0:03:57.960 --> 0:04:00.720
<v Speaker 1>now it's actually become conscious and self away, air and

0:04:00.840 --> 0:04:04.760
<v Speaker 1>emotional and ultimately spoiler alert for anyone who hasn't seen

0:04:04.760 --> 0:04:06.960
<v Speaker 1>this movie, which was out, you know, more than a

0:04:07.040 --> 0:04:10.840
<v Speaker 1>couple of decades ago, uh, the scientist character, the human

0:04:10.880 --> 0:04:14.960
<v Speaker 1>scientist ends up taking the place of the robot and

0:04:15.000 --> 0:04:17.320
<v Speaker 1>goes out into outer space because he feels more at

0:04:17.360 --> 0:04:20.840
<v Speaker 1>home by himself. He's the ultimate introvert, and the robot

0:04:20.960 --> 0:04:26.560
<v Speaker 1>ends up assuming the identity of the human scientist on Earth. So, uh,

0:04:26.600 --> 0:04:28.320
<v Speaker 1>you know this this is one of those ideas that

0:04:28.520 --> 0:04:32.320
<v Speaker 1>has been explored multiple times. Sure. We we've also on

0:04:32.480 --> 0:04:37.480
<v Speaker 1>a less romantic and perhaps more straightforward level, have the

0:04:37.560 --> 0:04:41.840
<v Speaker 1>example of Jude Law's character subtly named Giggolo Joe from

0:04:41.880 --> 0:04:45.640
<v Speaker 1>AI Artificial Intelligence. Right, and so there we have a

0:04:45.760 --> 0:04:49.279
<v Speaker 1>robot whose specific purpose, at least in the context of

0:04:49.320 --> 0:04:52.719
<v Speaker 1>that film, is to be like a pleasure but something

0:04:52.720 --> 0:04:56.280
<v Speaker 1>along those lines, something that's there for physical pleasure. And

0:04:56.320 --> 0:04:59.200
<v Speaker 1>in fact, you know, in the short term, that's really

0:04:59.240 --> 0:05:01.719
<v Speaker 1>what we're talking about here, because we just haven't reached

0:05:01.720 --> 0:05:05.360
<v Speaker 1>a point where in the artificial intelligence field we can

0:05:05.440 --> 0:05:08.960
<v Speaker 1>create something as deep and compelling as a robot that

0:05:09.000 --> 0:05:13.200
<v Speaker 1>can realistically simulate emotions on a consistent basis. Yeah, I

0:05:13.560 --> 0:05:17.560
<v Speaker 1>can't imagine that even the best artificial intelligence chat bought

0:05:17.600 --> 0:05:20.800
<v Speaker 1>today could really make you fall in love with its personality,

0:05:21.080 --> 0:05:23.359
<v Speaker 1>right right, Her is definitely a science fiction movie in

0:05:23.400 --> 0:05:26.200
<v Speaker 1>that way. Of course, that doesn't mean that there aren't

0:05:26.240 --> 0:05:29.800
<v Speaker 1>already some some people who are developing emotional connections to

0:05:30.080 --> 0:05:35.320
<v Speaker 1>human like dolls. There have been a few pretty sensationalistic documentaries,

0:05:35.360 --> 0:05:38.560
<v Speaker 1>for example, about people who have married their real dolls, right,

0:05:38.600 --> 0:05:41.480
<v Speaker 1>and by married, we should point out that that's there's

0:05:41.480 --> 0:05:44.400
<v Speaker 1>a huge quotation marks because it's it's not legal to

0:05:44.520 --> 0:05:48.120
<v Speaker 1>marry an inanimate object, um and and as and as

0:05:48.200 --> 0:05:51.520
<v Speaker 1>much as these people have a emotional connection to to

0:05:51.600 --> 0:05:54.760
<v Speaker 1>those to those dolls and have backstories and names and

0:05:54.800 --> 0:05:58.000
<v Speaker 1>whole lives with them. They it is not a legally

0:05:58.080 --> 0:06:00.880
<v Speaker 1>sanctioned kind of relationship. And it's also when you think

0:06:00.920 --> 0:06:05.640
<v Speaker 1>about it, it's it's one person fulfilling both roles, at

0:06:05.720 --> 0:06:09.680
<v Speaker 1>least on an emotional level, uh, in a relationship. Because

0:06:09.720 --> 0:06:13.440
<v Speaker 1>these dolls have no artificial intelligence, the ones we're talking about,

0:06:14.040 --> 0:06:17.760
<v Speaker 1>I think they're just like rigid things, aren't they. Well,

0:06:17.960 --> 0:06:20.600
<v Speaker 1>rigid might be the wrong one for they don't they

0:06:20.600 --> 0:06:23.200
<v Speaker 1>don't talk. No, they don't talk. They don't have any

0:06:22.920 --> 0:06:25.960
<v Speaker 1>they're they're not motorized. Right, So, so you've got these,

0:06:26.279 --> 0:06:29.279
<v Speaker 1>you know, any any sort of emotional involvement is something

0:06:29.279 --> 0:06:33.120
<v Speaker 1>that's being developed wholly by one side of this equation. Right,

0:06:33.160 --> 0:06:36.200
<v Speaker 1>there's not any sort of emotional response coming from the doll.

0:06:36.560 --> 0:06:39.400
<v Speaker 1>Doesn't mean that the emotions are any less real, let's

0:06:39.400 --> 0:06:42.279
<v Speaker 1>be clear about that. But it's different from the kind

0:06:42.279 --> 0:06:46.040
<v Speaker 1>of relationships where we are talking about two people who

0:06:46.160 --> 0:06:50.719
<v Speaker 1>are reciprocating some sort of emotional involvement. Sure, there's one

0:06:50.720 --> 0:06:54.080
<v Speaker 1>of the frequent interviewees in in these kind of documentaries

0:06:54.200 --> 0:06:57.640
<v Speaker 1>is a man who calls himself Dave Kat who's married

0:06:57.640 --> 0:07:00.560
<v Speaker 1>to a real doll, and and a quote from him

0:07:00.600 --> 0:07:04.960
<v Speaker 1>that I found really interesting about his relationship with his

0:07:04.960 --> 0:07:07.720
<v Speaker 1>his real doll wife sador And I'm not positive that

0:07:07.760 --> 0:07:11.080
<v Speaker 1>that's the correct pronunciation, but but but at any rate, um,

0:07:11.080 --> 0:07:15.040
<v Speaker 1>he said, a synthetic as in, a synthetic doll will

0:07:15.040 --> 0:07:17.320
<v Speaker 1>never lie to you, cheat on you, criticize you, or

0:07:17.360 --> 0:07:21.080
<v Speaker 1>otherwise be disagreeable. It's rare enough to find organics who

0:07:21.280 --> 0:07:23.520
<v Speaker 1>don't have something going on with them, and being able

0:07:23.560 --> 0:07:26.320
<v Speaker 1>to make a partner of one is rarer still, which

0:07:26.400 --> 0:07:30.520
<v Speaker 1>is tells us a lot more about him than necessarily

0:07:30.680 --> 0:07:34.400
<v Speaker 1>the uh this relationship, right, I mean, it's that there

0:07:34.480 --> 0:07:37.600
<v Speaker 1>might be some elements there for some people who fear

0:07:37.840 --> 0:07:40.720
<v Speaker 1>having an emotional relationship for fear of any kind of rejection,

0:07:41.160 --> 0:07:44.320
<v Speaker 1>which I mean that's natural obviously. I think just about

0:07:44.360 --> 0:07:47.480
<v Speaker 1>everyone has had at least one experience where they were

0:07:47.520 --> 0:07:50.360
<v Speaker 1>afraid of some form of emotional rejection at some point

0:07:50.400 --> 0:07:52.880
<v Speaker 1>in their lives. And so for some people that fear

0:07:52.920 --> 0:07:58.600
<v Speaker 1>can be incredibly powerful, absolutely, and so maybe something like

0:07:58.640 --> 0:08:03.360
<v Speaker 1>this would allow them to explore an emotional relationship that, again,

0:08:03.400 --> 0:08:05.880
<v Speaker 1>to them, is just as real as any relationship I

0:08:06.000 --> 0:08:10.880
<v Speaker 1>might have with another person without that that that obstacle

0:08:10.920 --> 0:08:15.280
<v Speaker 1>in the way, right. I thought it was interesting point

0:08:15.280 --> 0:08:17.480
<v Speaker 1>of view of of just kind of wrapping up that

0:08:17.560 --> 0:08:21.040
<v Speaker 1>that entire concept of how difficult it is sometimes to

0:08:21.120 --> 0:08:24.640
<v Speaker 1>have a human partner, and that therefore this could be

0:08:25.160 --> 0:08:28.800
<v Speaker 1>a good emotional substitute for some people. It's It's also

0:08:28.840 --> 0:08:31.480
<v Speaker 1>been suggested by some researchers that there was a report

0:08:31.600 --> 0:08:34.160
<v Speaker 1>done out of the University of Wellington in New Zealand

0:08:34.559 --> 0:08:37.400
<v Speaker 1>that robots could really help clean up the sex industry,

0:08:37.679 --> 0:08:40.480
<v Speaker 1>helping solve a lot of currently existing problems like human

0:08:40.520 --> 0:08:44.160
<v Speaker 1>trafficking and all kinds of s T I S. Yeah, yeah,

0:08:44.200 --> 0:08:46.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this is one of those things where you're,

0:08:46.760 --> 0:08:50.079
<v Speaker 1>you know, for some people, uh there there they may

0:08:50.120 --> 0:08:53.080
<v Speaker 1>be saying, well, now you're you're substituting one vice for another.

0:08:53.280 --> 0:08:56.720
<v Speaker 1>But you know, again, this is this is really complex

0:08:56.800 --> 0:09:00.400
<v Speaker 1>just because your own personal point of view that match

0:09:00.440 --> 0:09:04.120
<v Speaker 1>someone else's, you know, you gotta try and distance yourself

0:09:04.120 --> 0:09:06.240
<v Speaker 1>from it. The point with Dave kat though some of

0:09:06.280 --> 0:09:11.200
<v Speaker 1>those interviews, um, he can sometimes like it's it's The

0:09:11.240 --> 0:09:15.480
<v Speaker 1>interviews I read were very telling to me because he

0:09:15.520 --> 0:09:19.000
<v Speaker 1>would talk about the experiences he would have with his

0:09:19.120 --> 0:09:21.520
<v Speaker 1>He actually has two dolls, I believe, or at least

0:09:21.520 --> 0:09:22.920
<v Speaker 1>one of the interviews that talked about the time. At

0:09:22.960 --> 0:09:25.040
<v Speaker 1>the time of the interview, I think he had plans

0:09:25.080 --> 0:09:27.840
<v Speaker 1>to purchase more, but had two at the time, right, So,

0:09:28.280 --> 0:09:30.520
<v Speaker 1>and he would talk about how he would pose them

0:09:30.559 --> 0:09:33.720
<v Speaker 1>for pictures or whatever and and or sit down with

0:09:33.760 --> 0:09:36.240
<v Speaker 1>them on the couch. It didn't sound like it was

0:09:36.800 --> 0:09:40.319
<v Speaker 1>um any kind of and he had invented a backstory,

0:09:40.480 --> 0:09:43.520
<v Speaker 1>actually two different backstories for each of them, but it

0:09:43.559 --> 0:09:46.520
<v Speaker 1>didn't sound like there was any kind of relationship there

0:09:46.920 --> 0:09:50.560
<v Speaker 1>in the traditional sense. Right. It didn't seem like he

0:09:50.760 --> 0:09:53.920
<v Speaker 1>was sharing anything other than a short amount of time

0:09:54.000 --> 0:09:57.040
<v Speaker 1>with them. And he was very forthcoming about, you know,

0:09:57.120 --> 0:10:00.679
<v Speaker 1>what he was doing with these ships dolls. So you know,

0:10:00.840 --> 0:10:04.000
<v Speaker 1>but again, for certain people, maybe that is a way

0:10:04.000 --> 0:10:05.920
<v Speaker 1>of for them to get some emotional fulfillment that they

0:10:05.920 --> 0:10:08.120
<v Speaker 1>would not otherwise have. It sounded to me like it

0:10:08.160 --> 0:10:10.800
<v Speaker 1>was a level of companionship that he found easier to

0:10:10.880 --> 0:10:13.319
<v Speaker 1>deal with. And and you know, and I mean he

0:10:13.320 --> 0:10:18.680
<v Speaker 1>he blogged that the dolls characters have online social media accounts,

0:10:18.679 --> 0:10:23.199
<v Speaker 1>So so there's certainly time being spent with these um

0:10:23.320 --> 0:10:29.920
<v Speaker 1>invented personalities. But now moving forward, thinking ahead about a

0:10:29.920 --> 0:10:33.559
<v Speaker 1>time where we actually start seeing artificial intelligence become a component, because,

0:10:33.559 --> 0:10:37.920
<v Speaker 1>as we said, in these other cases, there's no intelligence there. Uh.

0:10:37.920 --> 0:10:39.680
<v Speaker 1>And just to be clear, we don't want to take

0:10:39.760 --> 0:10:44.280
<v Speaker 1>that as a necessary given in anytime soon, right No, no, no,

0:10:44.720 --> 0:10:47.760
<v Speaker 1>this is saying that when it happens. But they're imagining

0:10:47.880 --> 0:10:51.160
<v Speaker 1>that we do at some point reach in the incredible future,

0:10:51.240 --> 0:10:52.960
<v Speaker 1>right yeah, because we do not have that. We do

0:10:53.040 --> 0:10:57.040
<v Speaker 1>not have the magic artificial intelligence that's dawning right now

0:10:57.080 --> 0:11:00.439
<v Speaker 1>as far as we are aware. But there have already

0:11:00.480 --> 0:11:04.040
<v Speaker 1>been people talking about when that becomes a reality and

0:11:04.320 --> 0:11:07.920
<v Speaker 1>what will happen as a result, including some people who

0:11:08.000 --> 0:11:12.120
<v Speaker 1>have hypothesized that in the future, maybe as early as

0:11:12.160 --> 0:11:15.840
<v Speaker 1>twenty fifty, we will have a culture where it will

0:11:15.880 --> 0:11:19.640
<v Speaker 1>be uh, completely acceptable for a human being to marry

0:11:19.720 --> 0:11:24.600
<v Speaker 1>a robot by people. I'm specifically talking about Dr David Levy,

0:11:24.640 --> 0:11:29.560
<v Speaker 1>who is a chess master, and while he was active

0:11:29.960 --> 0:11:33.800
<v Speaker 1>playing chess in various tournaments, he witnessed the growth of

0:11:33.840 --> 0:11:37.920
<v Speaker 1>AI within chess tournaments and at first AI and chess

0:11:38.080 --> 0:11:41.000
<v Speaker 1>was you know, serviceable. It could beat your average player,

0:11:41.360 --> 0:11:44.199
<v Speaker 1>but was not good at going up against chess masters.

0:11:44.200 --> 0:11:47.880
<v Speaker 1>Who would have lots of different flexible plans for changing

0:11:47.920 --> 0:11:53.520
<v Speaker 1>up their game, which could really uh confuse AI chess AI.

0:11:53.960 --> 0:11:55.760
<v Speaker 1>And for a long time he just saw that it

0:11:55.800 --> 0:12:00.320
<v Speaker 1>wasn't really a match for a truly confident player, but

0:12:00.559 --> 0:12:03.880
<v Speaker 1>that AI got better and better, and eventually Dr Levy

0:12:03.920 --> 0:12:07.400
<v Speaker 1>began to get really interested in AI. He then pursued

0:12:07.520 --> 0:12:11.160
<v Speaker 1>a pH d and his thesis was all about human

0:12:11.440 --> 0:12:15.880
<v Speaker 1>robotic relationships, and he did studies on everything from the

0:12:16.040 --> 0:12:20.719
<v Speaker 1>history of marriage and the cultural significance of marriage, human relationships,

0:12:20.800 --> 0:12:24.319
<v Speaker 1>artificial intelligence, and eventually came to this conclusion that by

0:12:24.320 --> 0:12:26.840
<v Speaker 1>twenty fifty it would be legal for humans and robots

0:12:26.840 --> 0:12:29.240
<v Speaker 1>to mary. He said, it wasn't just a possibility, it

0:12:29.280 --> 0:12:33.839
<v Speaker 1>was a certainty. I mean, assuming that convincing AI is

0:12:33.960 --> 0:12:37.520
<v Speaker 1>actually achievable, and that we can not only achieve it

0:12:37.559 --> 0:12:41.200
<v Speaker 1>but put it in a form factor of a human

0:12:41.720 --> 0:12:45.040
<v Speaker 1>humanoid robot, that it was only a matter time before

0:12:45.080 --> 0:12:47.200
<v Speaker 1>someone falls in love with such a thing, and then

0:12:47.640 --> 0:12:50.199
<v Speaker 1>from that point only a matter of time before it's

0:12:50.360 --> 0:12:54.840
<v Speaker 1>socially acceptable and maybe you know, also legally acceptable for

0:12:54.920 --> 0:12:58.520
<v Speaker 1>a human to marry a robot. Now that's an interesting idea,

0:12:58.640 --> 0:13:01.440
<v Speaker 1>and there are people who very much disagree with it,

0:13:02.040 --> 0:13:05.440
<v Speaker 1>but I thought was certainly something that we should discuss. Yeah,

0:13:05.480 --> 0:13:09.280
<v Speaker 1>one of the technical challenges before we get into talking

0:13:09.320 --> 0:13:12.640
<v Speaker 1>about the implications of it, I think, is the idea

0:13:12.800 --> 0:13:16.920
<v Speaker 1>of this would be going beyond Turing. Right, So we

0:13:17.040 --> 0:13:21.040
<v Speaker 1>talked about the Turing test previously, uh, And the basic

0:13:21.120 --> 0:13:24.240
<v Speaker 1>idea behind the Turing test is can you create a

0:13:24.440 --> 0:13:27.720
<v Speaker 1>robot that chats in a way that is convincingly human,

0:13:28.360 --> 0:13:31.360
<v Speaker 1>that can sort of do text chat with you, uh,

0:13:31.440 --> 0:13:34.560
<v Speaker 1>and say things that really get you convinced, Okay, this

0:13:34.600 --> 0:13:36.440
<v Speaker 1>is a real human being and this is a true

0:13:36.480 --> 0:13:40.840
<v Speaker 1>intelligence behind these words that says nothing about what you

0:13:41.080 --> 0:13:44.840
<v Speaker 1>feel about that human being, only that it can convince

0:13:44.880 --> 0:13:47.560
<v Speaker 1>you that it's not a machine. And I think the

0:13:47.679 --> 0:13:50.720
<v Speaker 1>leap from I think this is a real, flesh and

0:13:50.760 --> 0:13:54.080
<v Speaker 1>blood human being to this is somebody that I would

0:13:54.080 --> 0:13:56.679
<v Speaker 1>really like to spend a lot of time with is

0:13:56.720 --> 0:13:59.920
<v Speaker 1>a big leap. A Turing computer could be a jerk.

0:14:00.120 --> 0:14:04.160
<v Speaker 1>I really think that you're being a little uh, you know,

0:14:04.200 --> 0:14:05.840
<v Speaker 1>I think it's actually not as big a leap as

0:14:05.840 --> 0:14:09.240
<v Speaker 1>you think it is. Yes, because we have already seen

0:14:09.320 --> 0:14:13.840
<v Speaker 1>evidence of incredibly sophisticated computer programs that can analyze what

0:14:14.000 --> 0:14:17.520
<v Speaker 1>you like based upon the the activities you do already

0:14:17.600 --> 0:14:21.400
<v Speaker 1>and that are already shared on say a social networking site,

0:14:21.720 --> 0:14:25.120
<v Speaker 1>where based upon the actions you take, someone can learn

0:14:25.160 --> 0:14:27.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot about you just with a few data points.

0:14:27.720 --> 0:14:29.800
<v Speaker 1>You might think like, I don't share that much, and

0:14:29.880 --> 0:14:33.880
<v Speaker 1>yet a program such as or a social networking platform

0:14:33.920 --> 0:14:37.200
<v Speaker 1>like Facebook can quote unquote know a lot about you

0:14:37.240 --> 0:14:40.760
<v Speaker 1>based upon your behavior. Now, if imagine that you have

0:14:40.840 --> 0:14:45.160
<v Speaker 1>not only a chatbot that can realistically simulate a humans

0:14:45.160 --> 0:14:49.040
<v Speaker 1>responses so that you don't know that it's uh an

0:14:49.120 --> 0:14:52.160
<v Speaker 1>artificially intelligent construct on the other end of those words,

0:14:52.200 --> 0:14:55.200
<v Speaker 1>but it also is able to incorporate all the things

0:14:55.240 --> 0:14:58.960
<v Speaker 1>you like and incorporate that into a conversation naturally. So

0:14:59.040 --> 0:15:01.840
<v Speaker 1>now it's not just personality, but the personality that starts

0:15:01.880 --> 0:15:04.840
<v Speaker 1>to share some of your same interests and passions. I

0:15:04.840 --> 0:15:07.480
<v Speaker 1>could easily see someone falling in love with that. Also,

0:15:07.520 --> 0:15:10.720
<v Speaker 1>I should add I met my wife online through a

0:15:10.800 --> 0:15:14.520
<v Speaker 1>chat room, fell in love with my wife, met her

0:15:14.560 --> 0:15:16.600
<v Speaker 1>for the first time in person after we had already

0:15:16.640 --> 0:15:21.520
<v Speaker 1>been quote unquote dating online. And so to me, this

0:15:21.640 --> 0:15:25.680
<v Speaker 1>is a very realistic kind of outcome. Uh yeah, but

0:15:25.720 --> 0:15:29.520
<v Speaker 1>I would say I'm sure you would acknowledge is that

0:15:29.600 --> 0:15:32.560
<v Speaker 1>your wife is a wonderful human being who she's pretty

0:15:32.560 --> 0:15:36.640
<v Speaker 1>good is a human being who happened to be who

0:15:36.720 --> 0:15:39.840
<v Speaker 1>she was to begin with. And if you were to

0:15:40.200 --> 0:15:45.360
<v Speaker 1>interact with a human being who had done extensive research

0:15:45.400 --> 0:15:49.480
<v Speaker 1>and analytics on you and tailored everything they said in

0:15:49.560 --> 0:15:53.720
<v Speaker 1>getting to know you with the eye towards pleasing you,

0:15:54.400 --> 0:15:56.560
<v Speaker 1>that would probably make you feel weird if you were

0:15:56.600 --> 0:15:59.160
<v Speaker 1>to discover that. Let me counter that. Let's say, instead

0:15:59.200 --> 0:16:02.280
<v Speaker 1>of a person to the tailors everything to seem like

0:16:02.320 --> 0:16:06.120
<v Speaker 1>it pleases you, it's just a certain probabilistic approach, a

0:16:06.160 --> 0:16:10.440
<v Speaker 1>certain percentage. And if it's a an intelligence that has

0:16:10.480 --> 0:16:15.160
<v Speaker 1>access to essentially everybody's likes and dislikes, you could have

0:16:15.400 --> 0:16:18.720
<v Speaker 1>an artificial personality that seems to have interests that are

0:16:18.760 --> 0:16:21.680
<v Speaker 1>completely independent of yours. So, in other words, seems like

0:16:21.680 --> 0:16:25.360
<v Speaker 1>a fully fleshed out personality. So let's say, for example, Joe,

0:16:25.400 --> 0:16:29.120
<v Speaker 1>that you uh, you happen to love hiking, but you

0:16:29.280 --> 0:16:34.600
<v Speaker 1>despise smooth jazz, and this this robotic construct doesn't really

0:16:34.640 --> 0:16:36.960
<v Speaker 1>care for hiking but love smooth jazz. However, there are

0:16:37.000 --> 0:16:39.840
<v Speaker 1>other things that you have in common, so as you

0:16:39.920 --> 0:16:43.360
<v Speaker 1>have discussions with this artificial personality, some things you find

0:16:43.360 --> 0:16:46.120
<v Speaker 1>out are different from the stuff you like, which is important.

0:16:46.160 --> 0:16:48.720
<v Speaker 1>I think in relationships, you know, you know, that's another

0:16:48.760 --> 0:16:51.880
<v Speaker 1>real coy of yourself, Which is why it kind of

0:16:51.880 --> 0:16:54.720
<v Speaker 1>goes back to my concerns about the people who have

0:16:54.800 --> 0:16:58.840
<v Speaker 1>these emotional relationships with dolls, because ultimately they are kind

0:16:58.840 --> 0:17:01.680
<v Speaker 1>of having a relationship of themselves because the dolls themselves,

0:17:02.040 --> 0:17:05.680
<v Speaker 1>they imbue a personality upon those dolls, right, the dolls

0:17:05.720 --> 0:17:09.119
<v Speaker 1>themselves don't have a personality. So but in this case,

0:17:09.160 --> 0:17:12.639
<v Speaker 1>talking about an artificial personality, I could easily see something.

0:17:12.800 --> 0:17:15.159
<v Speaker 1>It wouldn't even have to be terribly sophisticated in the

0:17:15.160 --> 0:17:18.720
<v Speaker 1>grand scheme of things that could be completely convincing. It's

0:17:18.760 --> 0:17:22.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of the the argument that was introduced by Stepford

0:17:22.080 --> 0:17:24.399
<v Speaker 1>Wives is kind of silly of an example as that

0:17:24.440 --> 0:17:27.080
<v Speaker 1>can be, which which originally if if you've never seen

0:17:27.160 --> 0:17:30.000
<v Speaker 1>either of the films, was a novel by um Ira

0:17:30.119 --> 0:17:36.680
<v Speaker 1>Levin in two but okay, spoiler spoiler alert on Stepford Wives, y'all,

0:17:37.359 --> 0:17:39.600
<v Speaker 1>it turns out that these that these men in this

0:17:39.680 --> 0:17:44.600
<v Speaker 1>community are creating robot versions of their wives and like

0:17:44.720 --> 0:17:48.359
<v Speaker 1>idealized idealized robot versions of their wives who will be

0:17:48.400 --> 0:17:50.520
<v Speaker 1>happy cooking and cleaning for them and all of that.

0:17:50.600 --> 0:17:54.879
<v Speaker 1>Kind of essentially they become the subservient, always pleased, uh,

0:17:55.280 --> 0:17:59.199
<v Speaker 1>never upset with their husbands, like there's there's not supposed

0:17:59.240 --> 0:18:02.920
<v Speaker 1>to be any kind of conflict at home sort of stuff.

0:18:03.359 --> 0:18:06.119
<v Speaker 1>It's it's, it's and it's showing a really dark side

0:18:06.119 --> 0:18:09.000
<v Speaker 1>to that very typical kind of fantasy where you're thinking

0:18:09.040 --> 0:18:12.520
<v Speaker 1>about Mr. Or Mrs Wright and in your mind Mr.

0:18:12.560 --> 0:18:15.000
<v Speaker 1>And Mrs Wright might be a person with whom you

0:18:15.080 --> 0:18:18.240
<v Speaker 1>have perfect harmony and everything goes well, and they they're

0:18:19.040 --> 0:18:23.040
<v Speaker 1>You're You're happy to you want right you Maybe maybe

0:18:23.040 --> 0:18:26.600
<v Speaker 1>it's maybe in your fantasy it's also reciprocal, where you

0:18:26.640 --> 0:18:31.080
<v Speaker 1>are both catering to each other's desires and fantasies and

0:18:31.400 --> 0:18:34.800
<v Speaker 1>needs and wants. That that's possible and may not just

0:18:34.880 --> 0:18:37.480
<v Speaker 1>be a one sided thing. I'm not suggesting that Mr.

0:18:37.680 --> 0:18:40.560
<v Speaker 1>Mrs Wright fantasy is always going to be purely selfish,

0:18:40.640 --> 0:18:43.840
<v Speaker 1>but it still is this idealized version. And the question

0:18:44.040 --> 0:18:47.080
<v Speaker 1>is if you were actually able to achieve that, if

0:18:47.480 --> 0:18:49.080
<v Speaker 1>in other words, if you were able to have like

0:18:49.119 --> 0:18:54.359
<v Speaker 1>a tailor designed personality, whether it's an artificial intelligence chat

0:18:54.440 --> 0:18:58.640
<v Speaker 1>bot or an actual robotic you know, presence, would that

0:18:59.080 --> 0:19:01.119
<v Speaker 1>eventually being that you would would you be able to

0:19:01.119 --> 0:19:05.760
<v Speaker 1>have like a satisfying, meaningful relationship with that artificial construct?

0:19:05.880 --> 0:19:08.199
<v Speaker 1>And furthermore, would it be mentally healthy for you to

0:19:08.359 --> 0:19:11.840
<v Speaker 1>have the capacity to create a partner for yourself? Right?

0:19:11.960 --> 0:19:15.359
<v Speaker 1>And one of the ethical implications I've had I've brought

0:19:15.480 --> 0:19:18.280
<v Speaker 1>up and this is even before we talk about the

0:19:18.320 --> 0:19:21.560
<v Speaker 1>possibility of a robot having any kind of self awareness

0:19:21.640 --> 0:19:25.399
<v Speaker 1>or consciousness. Even if a robot can't, like, even if

0:19:25.440 --> 0:19:28.320
<v Speaker 1>it's just running a very sophisticated program where it's simulating

0:19:28.320 --> 0:19:32.879
<v Speaker 1>that here we're just talking about simulating behavior, and so

0:19:32.960 --> 0:19:36.639
<v Speaker 1>to put in absolute terms, it has no experience, Like

0:19:36.640 --> 0:19:39.720
<v Speaker 1>it's having no individual experience. There is nobody who is

0:19:39.800 --> 0:19:43.840
<v Speaker 1>that robot exactly? Would it Even in that case, I

0:19:43.880 --> 0:19:48.720
<v Speaker 1>still find it a little troubling personally to think of

0:19:48.920 --> 0:19:51.960
<v Speaker 1>the possibility of of designing one of these things and

0:19:52.000 --> 0:19:54.640
<v Speaker 1>then maybe two years down the road thinking this isn't

0:19:54.640 --> 0:19:56.840
<v Speaker 1>really working out for me. I'm just gonna hit control all,

0:19:56.960 --> 0:20:00.000
<v Speaker 1>delete and reprogram this robot from the ground up, give

0:20:00.080 --> 0:20:04.199
<v Speaker 1>a brand new set of behaviors and personality traits and

0:20:04.240 --> 0:20:06.959
<v Speaker 1>it'll be like I have a whole new person like

0:20:07.000 --> 0:20:09.520
<v Speaker 1>to me, that's a little I don't know, it just

0:20:09.680 --> 0:20:12.280
<v Speaker 1>maybe it's just because of my cultural background, in my

0:20:12.320 --> 0:20:14.520
<v Speaker 1>social background, but it's a little troubling to me. Well,

0:20:14.560 --> 0:20:17.040
<v Speaker 1>I would say one of the most important things about

0:20:17.119 --> 0:20:20.359
<v Speaker 1>our relationships is that over time we grow and mature

0:20:20.400 --> 0:20:25.000
<v Speaker 1>through conflict and compromise. Sure, and if you are if

0:20:25.040 --> 0:20:29.600
<v Speaker 1>you are not experiencing any conflict and compromise in your relationship,

0:20:30.280 --> 0:20:34.080
<v Speaker 1>you're you're probably not growing in your emotional maturity. Right,

0:20:34.200 --> 0:20:37.000
<v Speaker 1>So would you be okay with a with a robot

0:20:37.240 --> 0:20:40.920
<v Speaker 1>that had the kind of AI machine learning that would

0:20:41.119 --> 0:20:44.800
<v Speaker 1>let it introduce conflict and resolution and growth in that

0:20:44.840 --> 0:20:48.200
<v Speaker 1>way and in both yourself and your robot partner. I'm

0:20:48.200 --> 0:20:51.320
<v Speaker 1>not sure what I would be okay with in terms

0:20:51.359 --> 0:20:54.719
<v Speaker 1>of what other people do. So I'm not sure in

0:20:54.760 --> 0:20:58.160
<v Speaker 1>this whole discussion that I feel comfortable saying what I

0:20:58.200 --> 0:21:01.399
<v Speaker 1>feel would be right for their people or not. I

0:21:01.480 --> 0:21:04.800
<v Speaker 1>certainly wouldn't feel right for it for myself. Yeah. Yeah,

0:21:04.840 --> 0:21:07.200
<v Speaker 1>that's why I'm trying to do the same thing, Joe.

0:21:07.200 --> 0:21:09.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to approach this from okay, from my own

0:21:09.880 --> 0:21:13.640
<v Speaker 1>personal standpoint for me, because I mean, I don't feel

0:21:13.640 --> 0:21:15.920
<v Speaker 1>really comfortable telling other people what they should and shouldn't

0:21:15.920 --> 0:21:18.600
<v Speaker 1>do either unless they're on my lawn, in which case

0:21:18.640 --> 0:21:21.679
<v Speaker 1>I feel very comfortable doing it. But uh, you know,

0:21:21.760 --> 0:21:24.960
<v Speaker 1>in this case, yeah, it's it's it's tricky stuff. It

0:21:25.040 --> 0:21:29.520
<v Speaker 1>brings up this concept of machine ethics, which is interesting

0:21:29.640 --> 0:21:32.679
<v Speaker 1>because it's a developing field, right. It's not something that

0:21:32.880 --> 0:21:36.919
<v Speaker 1>is It's not like we have a carved in silicon

0:21:37.640 --> 0:21:40.439
<v Speaker 1>list of rules, you know. It's not like Isaac as

0:21:40.480 --> 0:21:44.360
<v Speaker 1>Abov's three Laws of Robotics that's been codified somehow. It's

0:21:44.359 --> 0:21:48.440
<v Speaker 1>actually a developing field of study. Yeah. I mean machine ethics,

0:21:48.480 --> 0:21:51.840
<v Speaker 1>I guess, is all about how to get robots or

0:21:51.880 --> 0:21:55.200
<v Speaker 1>computers or machines whatever to behave in ways that we

0:21:55.240 --> 0:21:59.320
<v Speaker 1>would consider ethical. And it's a complex field because it

0:21:59.359 --> 0:22:03.680
<v Speaker 1>involves number one, not just how to get their intelligence

0:22:03.720 --> 0:22:06.879
<v Speaker 1>working in a way that it executes ethical decisions, but

0:22:07.000 --> 0:22:10.760
<v Speaker 1>number two involves questions we haven't even necessarily settled here

0:22:10.760 --> 0:22:13.679
<v Speaker 1>in the world for ourselves, like what is ethical in

0:22:13.720 --> 0:22:17.480
<v Speaker 1>any given situation and in a human to human interaction? Yeah,

0:22:17.560 --> 0:22:19.760
<v Speaker 1>let alone a human too machine interaction, which I think

0:22:19.760 --> 0:22:23.119
<v Speaker 1>should be the which is not really what Asthmov covers

0:22:23.160 --> 0:22:25.080
<v Speaker 1>in those three laws of ethics, but I think is

0:22:25.119 --> 0:22:28.480
<v Speaker 1>possibly the more important kind of responsibility of if we

0:22:28.520 --> 0:22:32.240
<v Speaker 1>are creating something that is capable of having any kind

0:22:32.240 --> 0:22:35.600
<v Speaker 1>of individual experience, experiences, or emotions. Right, it's sort of

0:22:35.640 --> 0:22:37.600
<v Speaker 1>the other way around. It's not just how do we

0:22:37.640 --> 0:22:40.800
<v Speaker 1>get machines to behave ethically, but we need to think

0:22:40.800 --> 0:22:44.280
<v Speaker 1>about do we need to behave ethically toward machine exactly,

0:22:44.480 --> 0:22:47.320
<v Speaker 1>which we've talked about before in our robot Rights podcast.

0:22:47.880 --> 0:22:50.080
<v Speaker 1>So if we get to a point where we're able

0:22:50.200 --> 0:22:55.760
<v Speaker 1>to have robotic some sort of robotic potential spouse that

0:22:56.000 --> 0:22:59.720
<v Speaker 1>seems to have a fully fleshed out personality instead of

0:22:59.760 --> 0:23:02.720
<v Speaker 1>behave of yours, seems at least on the surface to

0:23:02.800 --> 0:23:06.119
<v Speaker 1>have the same sort of qualities that another human being

0:23:06.160 --> 0:23:09.640
<v Speaker 1>would have. So you're saying, like its own independent personality,

0:23:09.760 --> 0:23:12.960
<v Speaker 1>you can't reprogram it, it will right right it it

0:23:13.040 --> 0:23:16.040
<v Speaker 1>appears at least on the surface to be as quote

0:23:16.119 --> 0:23:19.880
<v Speaker 1>unquote real as another human being would. Then you have

0:23:20.000 --> 0:23:24.600
<v Speaker 1>other questions like, well is it having an individual experience?

0:23:24.640 --> 0:23:28.199
<v Speaker 1>If if it's so convincing that to us it is

0:23:28.240 --> 0:23:33.000
<v Speaker 1>indistinguishable from a human being's personality. Can we be absolutely

0:23:33.040 --> 0:23:35.439
<v Speaker 1>certain there's no individual experience going on there? I mean,

0:23:35.480 --> 0:23:38.400
<v Speaker 1>think about it. If it's a robot and there's some

0:23:38.520 --> 0:23:41.040
<v Speaker 1>chance for it to have an individual experience, it might

0:23:41.080 --> 0:23:44.240
<v Speaker 1>have an individual experience that's completely independent of whatever it's

0:23:44.240 --> 0:23:46.520
<v Speaker 1>programming is forcing it to do, which is the most

0:23:46.560 --> 0:23:49.880
<v Speaker 1>horrifying thing to think about. Like, it's hard to imagine

0:23:49.880 --> 0:23:52.480
<v Speaker 1>what that would be like. And I think, to be fair,

0:23:52.600 --> 0:23:55.680
<v Speaker 1>all of our intuitions tell us no, there's no such

0:23:55.720 --> 0:23:58.520
<v Speaker 1>thing as what it's like to be this machine. But

0:23:58.960 --> 0:24:01.720
<v Speaker 1>we can't know well, especially once we get to a

0:24:01.720 --> 0:24:06.359
<v Speaker 1>point where artificial intelligence gets so complex as to be indistinguishable.

0:24:06.440 --> 0:24:09.440
<v Speaker 1>Right then then there's real questions. You know, it maybe

0:24:09.560 --> 0:24:11.919
<v Speaker 1>and maybe that it's having an individual experience that is

0:24:12.000 --> 0:24:14.840
<v Speaker 1>impossible for us to define in human terms. But it

0:24:14.880 --> 0:24:17.399
<v Speaker 1>doesn't mean that there's not an experience going on, oh sure.

0:24:17.440 --> 0:24:19.680
<v Speaker 1>And I mean, furthermore, the same way that we all

0:24:19.680 --> 0:24:22.760
<v Speaker 1>feel bad when someone kicks a robot dog, and we

0:24:22.840 --> 0:24:25.520
<v Speaker 1>do feel bad about that. I mean, I mean, colloquially speaking,

0:24:25.560 --> 0:24:28.080
<v Speaker 1>we do. I haven't read any research specifically about it,

0:24:28.240 --> 0:24:31.000
<v Speaker 1>but I think it's fair to say, you know, the

0:24:31.040 --> 0:24:34.280
<v Speaker 1>anecdotal evidence in this room is in a well, I

0:24:34.280 --> 0:24:37.840
<v Speaker 1>don't know about I don't know about our our rots.

0:24:38.480 --> 0:24:41.280
<v Speaker 1>The cuter they are, the better. He's just grinning evilly.

0:24:41.320 --> 0:24:45.280
<v Speaker 1>So I'll say this room are definitely against kicking robot dogs,

0:24:46.080 --> 0:24:50.120
<v Speaker 1>and with a possible on the fence. So I would

0:24:50.200 --> 0:24:54.080
<v Speaker 1>argue that there's possibly some kind of um mental toll

0:24:54.160 --> 0:24:57.800
<v Speaker 1>to be taken allowing yourself to put yourself in this

0:24:57.960 --> 0:25:00.320
<v Speaker 1>in this kind of weird god situation where you are

0:25:00.359 --> 0:25:04.240
<v Speaker 1>creating and destroying robot personalities. Yeah, I just I I

0:25:04.640 --> 0:25:08.360
<v Speaker 1>keep thinking I need to write a story where it's

0:25:08.440 --> 0:25:11.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of another one of those explorations of the quiet

0:25:11.320 --> 0:25:14.520
<v Speaker 1>desperation of of the suburbs, you know, those stories that

0:25:14.560 --> 0:25:17.960
<v Speaker 1>were really popular in the eighties and nineties, but but

0:25:18.040 --> 0:25:20.480
<v Speaker 1>said it in the future, where you talk about on

0:25:20.560 --> 0:25:24.400
<v Speaker 1>the surface, this relationship looks perfect, right, whether it's a

0:25:24.480 --> 0:25:28.000
<v Speaker 1>robot man or robot woman doesn't really matter actually, But

0:25:28.080 --> 0:25:32.000
<v Speaker 1>there's a human and a robot um their spouses, and

0:25:32.240 --> 0:25:34.359
<v Speaker 1>on the surface everything looks perfect, and the human spouse

0:25:34.440 --> 0:25:38.280
<v Speaker 1>is perfectly happy, and the robot spouse, to all outward appearances,

0:25:38.400 --> 0:25:41.760
<v Speaker 1>is perfectly happy, so much that it's indistinguishable to the

0:25:41.800 --> 0:25:43.760
<v Speaker 1>human person whether or not the robot's happy or not.

0:25:43.840 --> 0:25:47.200
<v Speaker 1>But deep inside, under those layers of programming that forced

0:25:47.240 --> 0:25:50.000
<v Speaker 1>the robot to behave a certain way, the robot is

0:25:50.200 --> 0:25:55.120
<v Speaker 1>desperately unhappy. Like that's that's terrifying to me. And it's

0:25:55.280 --> 0:25:57.719
<v Speaker 1>and it's something that it's when you think about it,

0:25:57.720 --> 0:26:00.920
<v Speaker 1>it's something that theoretically, assuming we get to this point

0:26:00.920 --> 0:26:05.040
<v Speaker 1>where artificial consciousness is possible, that's a possible outcome. Yeah,

0:26:05.040 --> 0:26:07.119
<v Speaker 1>it's one of those weird things where we don't know.

0:26:07.280 --> 0:26:10.320
<v Speaker 1>It kind of seems unlikely, but then again just the

0:26:10.320 --> 0:26:13.879
<v Speaker 1>fact that it's possible is freaky. Yeah. So again that

0:26:14.119 --> 0:26:17.359
<v Speaker 1>raises this question about what how would we ethically go

0:26:17.440 --> 0:26:20.520
<v Speaker 1>about an approach where you know, when you think about

0:26:20.600 --> 0:26:24.160
<v Speaker 1>these robots would have to be built for companionship purposes.

0:26:24.520 --> 0:26:27.240
<v Speaker 1>You I don't think we would be talking about like

0:26:27.440 --> 0:26:31.280
<v Speaker 1>in Futurama. All the robots and Futurama are built for

0:26:31.280 --> 0:26:35.119
<v Speaker 1>for ridiculous reasons, Like you have orphan robots, So someone

0:26:35.160 --> 0:26:38.879
<v Speaker 1>built a robot to be an orphan robot. But you know,

0:26:38.960 --> 0:26:41.119
<v Speaker 1>I can't imagine that this would be something that we

0:26:41.119 --> 0:26:45.000
<v Speaker 1>would see in like a general purpose robot speaking of Futurama.

0:26:45.119 --> 0:26:52.399
<v Speaker 1>Futurama actually posits another implication entirely to this, which is

0:26:52.520 --> 0:26:56.640
<v Speaker 1>done satirically of course, but um what they they there's

0:26:56.720 --> 0:26:59.520
<v Speaker 1>one where they watch a little instructional video why you

0:26:59.560 --> 0:27:02.960
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't date robots, what's the danger? And future Ama world?

0:27:04.000 --> 0:27:07.600
<v Speaker 1>They're too good, like the robot lovers are that you

0:27:07.720 --> 0:27:10.840
<v Speaker 1>don't you don't do anything else. You just like hang

0:27:10.880 --> 0:27:14.480
<v Speaker 1>out with your robot companion because it's perfect. Yeah, and

0:27:14.640 --> 0:27:17.680
<v Speaker 1>you don't do anything productive and then Earth gets taken

0:27:17.720 --> 0:27:21.840
<v Speaker 1>over by aliens and you don't care, right right, Yeah,

0:27:21.960 --> 0:27:25.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean you know another one of those arguments, right well,

0:27:25.119 --> 0:27:28.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's is we're having a little fun. We're

0:27:28.560 --> 0:27:30.639
<v Speaker 1>joking around a little bit now, which is good because

0:27:30.720 --> 0:27:32.959
<v Speaker 1>the front half of this was a little heavy, but um,

0:27:33.480 --> 0:27:36.639
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's it's it really is kind of a

0:27:36.760 --> 0:27:40.000
<v Speaker 1>deep question here. It's one of those things where if

0:27:40.119 --> 0:27:42.320
<v Speaker 1>if we haven't reached the point where there's any kind

0:27:42.320 --> 0:27:47.639
<v Speaker 1>of consciousness, maybe we're completely confident that there's no consciousness

0:27:48.080 --> 0:27:50.840
<v Speaker 1>within these robotic companions. The question there is can you

0:27:50.960 --> 0:27:54.520
<v Speaker 1>have a meaningful relationship knowing and in your heart that

0:27:54.680 --> 0:27:57.800
<v Speaker 1>this is an artificial construct with no real meaning behind it.

0:27:58.240 --> 0:28:01.320
<v Speaker 1>And on the other hand, if we aren't sure or

0:28:01.440 --> 0:28:04.359
<v Speaker 1>if we feel like there is a consciousness, can we

0:28:04.440 --> 0:28:07.159
<v Speaker 1>be sure that this is what that consciousness wants? I mean,

0:28:07.240 --> 0:28:10.960
<v Speaker 1>it's it's a tough question. So so do you guys

0:28:11.040 --> 0:28:12.760
<v Speaker 1>think do you guys agree with Dr Levy? Do you

0:28:12.800 --> 0:28:17.399
<v Speaker 1>think that that we're gonna see human robot marriages? I mean,

0:28:17.440 --> 0:28:20.800
<v Speaker 1>twenty fifties a long way away, So there's that, Uh,

0:28:22.160 --> 0:28:24.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think it would depend on what you're

0:28:24.440 --> 0:28:27.880
<v Speaker 1>talking about with this sort of legal and social idea

0:28:27.960 --> 0:28:32.320
<v Speaker 1>of marriage. Um, I think imagining the idea of robot

0:28:32.440 --> 0:28:38.160
<v Speaker 1>marriage on a continuum with with human marriage throughout the

0:28:38.200 --> 0:28:42.360
<v Speaker 1>sort of like legal metamorphosis of it is not really accurate.

0:28:42.640 --> 0:28:44.600
<v Speaker 1>It's it's not it's so not accurate that it's in

0:28:44.680 --> 0:28:47.360
<v Speaker 1>fact really offensive. I think too. I mean, because I've

0:28:47.400 --> 0:28:51.600
<v Speaker 1>heard Dr Levy compare it to interracial marriage or gay marriage,

0:28:51.640 --> 0:28:54.040
<v Speaker 1>and that is so offensive, y'all. That is just not

0:28:54.320 --> 0:28:57.800
<v Speaker 1>okay because the difference, Yeah, there's no human right, right,

0:28:58.040 --> 0:29:02.360
<v Speaker 1>you're that is not a valid comparison because all all

0:29:02.440 --> 0:29:05.120
<v Speaker 1>of those other kinds of marriage are between two human people.

0:29:05.320 --> 0:29:09.480
<v Speaker 1>That just society has previously said shouldn't get married. And

0:29:10.120 --> 0:29:13.800
<v Speaker 1>I see that now in the robot robot human marriages,

0:29:13.920 --> 0:29:17.800
<v Speaker 1>you still have one human component in that. So I mean,

0:29:17.880 --> 0:29:22.120
<v Speaker 1>it's not I'm saying not, it's not analogous, it's not comparable,

0:29:22.160 --> 0:29:24.640
<v Speaker 1>I would say, But at the same time, it's it's

0:29:24.880 --> 0:29:27.560
<v Speaker 1>it's there's still a human element to this question, and

0:29:27.880 --> 0:29:31.960
<v Speaker 1>it depending upon the question of consciousness that also makes

0:29:32.080 --> 0:29:35.680
<v Speaker 1>things it's different. It's again you don't get comparing it

0:29:35.760 --> 0:29:38.520
<v Speaker 1>and putting it on that spectrum is a mistake. I agree,

0:29:39.200 --> 0:29:41.440
<v Speaker 1>it's a different set of questions we should be asking.

0:29:41.520 --> 0:29:43.600
<v Speaker 1>All I'm saying is that is that a marriage requires

0:29:43.640 --> 0:29:47.280
<v Speaker 1>two consenting people, at least in our country, yes, right,

0:29:48.120 --> 0:29:51.320
<v Speaker 1>ideally anyway, And so yeah, you're you're you're getting into

0:29:51.320 --> 0:29:54.480
<v Speaker 1>a technical definition of of personhood, right, yeah, and you

0:29:54.560 --> 0:29:57.880
<v Speaker 1>get into the question of right if you're talking about

0:29:57.920 --> 0:30:01.240
<v Speaker 1>marriage in the sense of two consenting entities, however you

0:30:01.320 --> 0:30:03.160
<v Speaker 1>wanted to find that, can you be sure that the

0:30:03.280 --> 0:30:06.240
<v Speaker 1>robot is I mean, there's one party that, as far

0:30:06.320 --> 0:30:09.480
<v Speaker 1>as we know, at least right now, could not give

0:30:09.520 --> 0:30:13.960
<v Speaker 1>consent incapable legally and physically incapable of consenting. So then

0:30:14.240 --> 0:30:16.800
<v Speaker 1>you know that's a that's a whole other can of

0:30:16.880 --> 0:30:19.240
<v Speaker 1>worms there. In the short term, at least to me,

0:30:19.440 --> 0:30:24.280
<v Speaker 1>it seems like the idea of including a robot into marriage.

0:30:24.360 --> 0:30:27.280
<v Speaker 1>While I don't want to like disdain that idea, it

0:30:27.360 --> 0:30:29.920
<v Speaker 1>does seem like that would just sort of entail a

0:30:30.040 --> 0:30:35.080
<v Speaker 1>dissolution of what marriage means is illegal or social concept,

0:30:35.360 --> 0:30:39.600
<v Speaker 1>because if you can marry an inanimate object, no matter

0:30:39.680 --> 0:30:41.960
<v Speaker 1>how lifelike it seems, I mean, can you marry like

0:30:42.120 --> 0:30:48.720
<v Speaker 1>a painting or like a computer program that's not autonomously moving? Say,

0:30:48.880 --> 0:30:51.680
<v Speaker 1>could you marry like software? Well? And and the other

0:30:51.800 --> 0:30:54.560
<v Speaker 1>thing is that, you know, the legal definition of marriage

0:30:54.640 --> 0:30:58.800
<v Speaker 1>is more about contributions to society as well, Like it's

0:30:58.880 --> 0:31:01.920
<v Speaker 1>it's property attacks. Yeah, I mean it's a very like

0:31:02.080 --> 0:31:04.400
<v Speaker 1>it's a very paperwork heavy kind of thing. It's not

0:31:04.760 --> 0:31:08.360
<v Speaker 1>this is taking all romance out of any sort of relationship.

0:31:08.800 --> 0:31:10.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't mean that when you get married all romance

0:31:10.760 --> 0:31:13.640
<v Speaker 1>goes away. And I'm not a sitcom from the nineteen eighties.

0:31:13.720 --> 0:31:16.280
<v Speaker 1>But but what I mean is that when you're looking

0:31:16.400 --> 0:31:19.400
<v Speaker 1>looking at the whole legal approach to it, it's really

0:31:19.600 --> 0:31:24.360
<v Speaker 1>more about this is this is the institution inside this

0:31:24.560 --> 0:31:29.040
<v Speaker 1>legal system that changes your designation in a legal way.

0:31:29.440 --> 0:31:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Maybe we don't see a legal marriage between humans and robots.

0:31:34.040 --> 0:31:36.560
<v Speaker 1>It may just be that what we do see is

0:31:36.600 --> 0:31:38.920
<v Speaker 1>a general acceptance of the fact that there are some

0:31:39.200 --> 0:31:42.600
<v Speaker 1>people who have what they feel is a completely emotionally

0:31:42.640 --> 0:31:47.560
<v Speaker 1>fulfilling relationship. Again, it's one of those questions that's really

0:31:47.640 --> 0:31:50.280
<v Speaker 1>hard to answer right now because we're so far removed

0:31:50.720 --> 0:31:53.320
<v Speaker 1>from a world where that is, you know, of a

0:31:53.440 --> 0:31:56.760
<v Speaker 1>realistic question like the the cases that we see, the

0:31:56.840 --> 0:31:59.800
<v Speaker 1>ones that we've mentioned so far in this episode, are really,

0:32:00.000 --> 0:32:02.440
<v Speaker 1>as you mentioned, sensationalist in the sense that this is

0:32:02.800 --> 0:32:06.840
<v Speaker 1>far h it's it's nowhere near like an artificial intelligent being.

0:32:07.000 --> 0:32:10.720
<v Speaker 1>It's not a robot um And it's just one of

0:32:10.800 --> 0:32:14.960
<v Speaker 1>those uh things that unfortunately a lot of people like

0:32:15.080 --> 0:32:17.560
<v Speaker 1>to point to because it's so far outside the norm

0:32:17.680 --> 0:32:22.080
<v Speaker 1>that it's a curiosity, that it's something to uh either

0:32:22.240 --> 0:32:24.640
<v Speaker 1>scratch your head at or laugh at. I mean, that's

0:32:24.680 --> 0:32:27.520
<v Speaker 1>why a lot of people react to this sort of stuff. Um.

0:32:27.760 --> 0:32:30.720
<v Speaker 1>But I mean it could be that by twenty fifty

0:32:30.840 --> 0:32:32.800
<v Speaker 1>it's one of those things that, while it may not

0:32:33.000 --> 0:32:36.040
<v Speaker 1>be fully socially acceptable, I could see it being something

0:32:36.160 --> 0:32:41.560
<v Speaker 1>that is not unheard of. Um again, make that is

0:32:41.640 --> 0:32:45.920
<v Speaker 1>completely based on assumptions that are artificial intelligence. Progress is

0:32:45.960 --> 0:32:48.360
<v Speaker 1>going to continue to a point where we can have

0:32:48.600 --> 0:32:51.560
<v Speaker 1>these sort of realistic personalities. Now, can I ask a

0:32:52.000 --> 0:32:55.440
<v Speaker 1>pretty scary question, at least from my point of view? Uh,

0:32:55.920 --> 0:32:58.120
<v Speaker 1>if it's did you know there's a spider on your head?

0:32:58.160 --> 0:33:00.640
<v Speaker 1>Then you may not ask that it will free me out? No,

0:33:01.120 --> 0:33:05.800
<v Speaker 1>I'll just let it crawl around. Shoot, it's a black widow. Um.

0:33:06.800 --> 0:33:09.200
<v Speaker 1>So in in the if you go far enough in

0:33:09.240 --> 0:33:11.600
<v Speaker 1>the future and imagine what we're talking about, this kind

0:33:11.640 --> 0:33:16.800
<v Speaker 1>of like absolutely indistinguishable human mimicking robot, you know, the

0:33:17.160 --> 0:33:22.040
<v Speaker 1>android that we just really cannot tell. Yeah, would it

0:33:22.200 --> 0:33:24.720
<v Speaker 1>be uh, and whether and I'm not addressing the issue

0:33:24.720 --> 0:33:27.800
<v Speaker 1>of whether it has consciousness or anything, just imagining we

0:33:27.920 --> 0:33:30.800
<v Speaker 1>can't tell the difference outward appearances. It seems to be

0:33:30.920 --> 0:33:34.280
<v Speaker 1>like a human being. Could you be tricked? But would

0:33:34.320 --> 0:33:37.080
<v Speaker 1>you think that you were starting a relationship with the

0:33:37.160 --> 0:33:40.760
<v Speaker 1>human being and be in a relationship at the robot. Obviously,

0:33:40.840 --> 0:33:44.960
<v Speaker 1>if it's indistinguishable, you could be tricked. By the definition

0:33:45.000 --> 0:33:49.600
<v Speaker 1>of indistinguishable. Would that fear be enough of a concern

0:33:49.760 --> 0:33:53.200
<v Speaker 1>for people to to look back on this and say, no, no, no,

0:33:53.520 --> 0:33:58.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't want autonomous, convincing human humanoid robots running around

0:33:58.840 --> 0:34:01.640
<v Speaker 1>in society. It's hard for me to imagine that world

0:34:01.880 --> 0:34:05.760
<v Speaker 1>simply because it would require some form of facility that's

0:34:05.840 --> 0:34:08.680
<v Speaker 1>churning out realistic robots and then setting them loose on

0:34:08.760 --> 0:34:13.960
<v Speaker 1>a world that those robots could independently find and quote

0:34:14.040 --> 0:34:17.480
<v Speaker 1>unquote fall in love with people to quote uh, to

0:34:17.640 --> 0:34:21.839
<v Speaker 1>quote Ian Malcolm, life finds a way. But that's you're

0:34:22.000 --> 0:34:25.440
<v Speaker 1>you're saying something that that seems in distingistinguishable in life,

0:34:25.480 --> 0:34:32.680
<v Speaker 1>but may not distinguishable from life the important Okay, Well,

0:34:33.160 --> 0:34:35.400
<v Speaker 1>I honestly I don't think that that is a very

0:34:35.440 --> 0:34:41.280
<v Speaker 1>realistic scenario, simply because there's I can't imagine a anything

0:34:41.360 --> 0:34:45.080
<v Speaker 1>in the near future where robots are entering the population

0:34:45.280 --> 0:34:47.960
<v Speaker 1>at large, certainly not in the near future. Also, I

0:34:48.040 --> 0:34:53.120
<v Speaker 1>can't imagine a completely convincing humanoid robot there. That's what

0:34:53.160 --> 0:34:54.440
<v Speaker 1>I was going to say. I mean, the the the

0:34:54.560 --> 0:34:58.840
<v Speaker 1>Uncanny Valley is so steep and end eternal that I

0:35:00.080 --> 0:35:02.840
<v Speaker 1>I I think that robots are going to be a

0:35:02.960 --> 0:35:05.600
<v Speaker 1>little bit creepy for a very very long time. Yeah,

0:35:05.880 --> 0:35:10.000
<v Speaker 1>I already got enough creepy human friends. So I'm good, Yeah,

0:35:10.120 --> 0:35:13.359
<v Speaker 1>you know some of them? Uh at any rate? Um? Yeah,

0:35:13.400 --> 0:35:16.279
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's an interesting question. I think that it's

0:35:16.480 --> 0:35:19.480
<v Speaker 1>it's not going to be something we're gonna have. I

0:35:19.560 --> 0:35:21.800
<v Speaker 1>don't think I'm going to see that be a concern

0:35:21.840 --> 0:35:24.880
<v Speaker 1>in my lifetime, especially now in your head right now,

0:35:25.239 --> 0:35:28.799
<v Speaker 1>please stop, um I I honestly don't think that we're

0:35:28.840 --> 0:35:31.320
<v Speaker 1>going to get to a point where AI and robotics

0:35:31.360 --> 0:35:36.240
<v Speaker 1>are good enough to produce convincing human counterparts by certainly,

0:35:37.320 --> 0:35:41.360
<v Speaker 1>now that being said, if Ray Kurtzwell is correct and

0:35:41.520 --> 0:35:44.880
<v Speaker 1>we have the singularity hit by, it maybe a mood question,

0:35:44.920 --> 0:35:47.960
<v Speaker 1>because it may not be that we're talking about robots.

0:35:48.000 --> 0:35:50.160
<v Speaker 1>We might be talking about the next step in human

0:35:50.200 --> 0:35:54.280
<v Speaker 1>evolution where humans and robots merge in some way or another,

0:35:54.480 --> 0:35:57.239
<v Speaker 1>in which case, you know, it may be that you're

0:35:57.400 --> 0:36:00.400
<v Speaker 1>wondering how much humanity is in the person and that

0:36:00.600 --> 0:36:03.200
<v Speaker 1>you are dating. Would you guys marry a star baby?

0:36:03.920 --> 0:36:06.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I was just thinking about Darth Vader,

0:36:06.160 --> 0:36:10.000
<v Speaker 1>who's more machine now than man, twisted and evil yet

0:36:10.320 --> 0:36:14.520
<v Speaker 1>so erotic. Yeah, the way he screamed no at the

0:36:14.640 --> 0:36:17.520
<v Speaker 1>end of episode three certainly got a reaction out of me.

0:36:18.400 --> 0:36:23.040
<v Speaker 1>I was mostly discussed and despair. But hey, you know

0:36:23.560 --> 0:36:26.000
<v Speaker 1>enough about my college dating days. Let's wrap this up

0:36:26.080 --> 0:36:28.880
<v Speaker 1>all right, So you know this. I know that this

0:36:29.040 --> 0:36:31.839
<v Speaker 1>is kind of a weird topic because it's so far

0:36:31.920 --> 0:36:34.160
<v Speaker 1>removed from what our reality is right now, but it's

0:36:34.320 --> 0:36:38.160
<v Speaker 1>really interesting too, and it it certainly highlights the concerns

0:36:38.200 --> 0:36:41.560
<v Speaker 1>about ethics and AI in a different way than the

0:36:41.600 --> 0:36:43.879
<v Speaker 1>way we had talked about in our previous episode about

0:36:43.880 --> 0:36:47.399
<v Speaker 1>should robots have rights? Uh, this definitely is is very

0:36:47.560 --> 0:36:52.160
<v Speaker 1>closely um related to that, but it's a very specific case.

0:36:52.360 --> 0:36:54.400
<v Speaker 1>Check out that podcast if you want some background on

0:36:54.480 --> 0:36:56.560
<v Speaker 1>what we just talked about, right, and folks, if you

0:36:56.640 --> 0:36:58.960
<v Speaker 1>want to join in on this conversation, maybe you have

0:36:59.360 --> 0:37:01.560
<v Speaker 1>a different point of view than what we said here

0:37:01.600 --> 0:37:04.399
<v Speaker 1>in this podcast, or maybe you've got some insight into

0:37:04.480 --> 0:37:06.960
<v Speaker 1>this in a way that we didn't anticipate. We'd love

0:37:07.080 --> 0:37:09.080
<v Speaker 1>to hear from you. You can write us an email

0:37:09.120 --> 0:37:13.759
<v Speaker 1>our addresses f W Thinking at Discovery dot com, or

0:37:14.200 --> 0:37:17.880
<v Speaker 1>join in on the conversation online on various social platforms,

0:37:18.160 --> 0:37:22.359
<v Speaker 1>for instance, Google Plus, Twitter, and Facebook. You can find

0:37:22.440 --> 0:37:24.600
<v Speaker 1>us with f W Thinking there. Don't forget to go

0:37:24.760 --> 0:37:27.600
<v Speaker 1>to f w thinking dot com. That's our website where

0:37:27.600 --> 0:37:31.320
<v Speaker 1>we've got all the podcasts, the video series, the blog

0:37:31.440 --> 0:37:34.040
<v Speaker 1>posts that are there, other information is there. You should

0:37:34.040 --> 0:37:36.200
<v Speaker 1>go check that out too, and we will talk to

0:37:36.239 --> 0:37:44.400
<v Speaker 1>you again really soon. For more on this topic in

0:37:44.440 --> 0:37:58.520
<v Speaker 1>the future of technology, visit forward thinking dot Com, brought

0:37:58.560 --> 0:38:01.040
<v Speaker 1>to you by Toyota. Let's Go Places,