WEBVTT - Nvidia Down After Missing Investors' Lofty Expectations and CA AI Bill Advances

0:00:01.400 --> 0:00:05.720
<v Speaker 1>From Marhart where Innovation, Money and power Collie in Silicon

0:00:05.800 --> 0:00:06.680
<v Speaker 1>Vallet NBN.

0:00:07.040 --> 0:00:10.480
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Technology with Caroline Hyde.

0:00:10.160 --> 0:00:11.280
<v Speaker 3>And Ed Loved Love.

0:00:25.239 --> 0:00:27.800
<v Speaker 4>Live from New York and San Francisco. This is Bloomberg

0:00:27.840 --> 0:00:31.560
<v Speaker 4>Technology coming up in videop is the Price of lofty expectations.

0:00:31.840 --> 0:00:36.400
<v Speaker 4>CEO Jensen One tries to boost confidence in a Bloomberg exclusive.

0:00:36.680 --> 0:00:40.040
<v Speaker 5>Past the Telegram. CEO is charged and out on bail

0:00:40.200 --> 0:00:42.839
<v Speaker 5>in France. So the crimes committed on the app. We

0:00:42.840 --> 0:00:44.320
<v Speaker 5>go live to Paris.

0:00:43.960 --> 0:00:45.159
<v Speaker 6>And California advances.

0:00:45.200 --> 0:00:49.000
<v Speaker 4>It's controversial AI safety bill that has divided tech leaders.

0:00:49.120 --> 0:00:51.519
<v Speaker 6>We'll discuss the law as it heads to the state Senate.

0:00:51.880 --> 0:00:54.400
<v Speaker 4>That is so much more coming up, but first which

0:00:54.440 --> 0:00:56.800
<v Speaker 4>I can on the key name that we are all

0:00:56.800 --> 0:00:59.880
<v Speaker 4>watching today in video of by two point eight percent,

0:01:00.200 --> 0:01:02.680
<v Speaker 4>the three trillion dollar company not living up to the

0:01:02.760 --> 0:01:05.240
<v Speaker 4>hype in terms of its forecasts and particularly Blackwell, which

0:01:05.280 --> 0:01:07.560
<v Speaker 4>will dig into ed but it's not dragging down the

0:01:07.560 --> 0:01:08.520
<v Speaker 4>rest of the indices.

0:01:10.000 --> 0:01:12.679
<v Speaker 5>Mark it up in vidio down. I caught up with

0:01:12.760 --> 0:01:16.959
<v Speaker 5>Nvidia CEO Jensen Wang after the results. He addressed concerns

0:01:17.200 --> 0:01:20.960
<v Speaker 5>about the company's latest generation Blackwell chips.

0:01:20.840 --> 0:01:23.080
<v Speaker 7>We're expecting Q three to have more supply than Q two,

0:01:23.319 --> 0:01:25.640
<v Speaker 7>We're expecting Q four to have more supplier than Q three,

0:01:25.720 --> 0:01:27.440
<v Speaker 7>and we're expecting Q one to have more supply than

0:01:27.480 --> 0:01:30.240
<v Speaker 7>Q four, And so I think our supply, our supply

0:01:30.360 --> 0:01:32.800
<v Speaker 7>condition going into next year will be in will be

0:01:33.280 --> 0:01:35.280
<v Speaker 7>a large improvement over this last year.

0:01:37.920 --> 0:01:42.160
<v Speaker 5>Congensabani of Bloomberg Intelligence joins us now in San Francisco.

0:01:42.840 --> 0:01:46.600
<v Speaker 5>You said it in Vidio's strong expectations stronger.

0:01:46.959 --> 0:01:48.640
<v Speaker 8>What's your thesis this morning.

0:01:48.680 --> 0:01:51.000
<v Speaker 9>When they've fallen victim to their own strength and on

0:01:51.080 --> 0:01:54.280
<v Speaker 9>realistic expectations. When we look about the top concerns going

0:01:54.280 --> 0:01:57.560
<v Speaker 9>into the prink blackwell, the several billion in Q four

0:01:57.560 --> 0:01:59.920
<v Speaker 9>put a lid on uncertainties in twenty twenty five.

0:02:00.200 --> 0:02:04.320
<v Speaker 5>Demand sustainability, just real quick, because several billion doesn't mean anything.

0:02:04.720 --> 0:02:07.440
<v Speaker 9>Well, it still is solid in terms of what we

0:02:07.520 --> 0:02:10.000
<v Speaker 9>expected or given the last four weeks of what we've

0:02:10.000 --> 0:02:12.600
<v Speaker 9>been hearing the issues. So that's still impressive that they

0:02:12.600 --> 0:02:15.959
<v Speaker 9>are able to pull it off so soon. Second, demand sustainability,

0:02:16.000 --> 0:02:19.600
<v Speaker 9>we saw demand broadening and in fact getting stronger beyond.

0:02:19.320 --> 0:02:20.480
<v Speaker 10>Just the large cloud guys.

0:02:20.600 --> 0:02:23.200
<v Speaker 9>And finally, when we put it all together our estimates,

0:02:23.240 --> 0:02:25.440
<v Speaker 9>and I believe most of the street estimates are actually

0:02:25.440 --> 0:02:27.519
<v Speaker 9>going up after this earnings than they were before.

0:02:28.400 --> 0:02:31.399
<v Speaker 4>Quin John, Yes, perhaps it's a victim of its own

0:02:31.400 --> 0:02:35.440
<v Speaker 4>success and analyst investors' exuberance around the name. But is

0:02:35.440 --> 0:02:39.280
<v Speaker 4>it also a victim of its own ambitions setting itself

0:02:40.000 --> 0:02:44.399
<v Speaker 4>terms of time that just aren't able to be hit

0:02:44.560 --> 0:02:47.240
<v Speaker 4>When we see that people aren't disappointed by a Q

0:02:47.360 --> 0:02:49.800
<v Speaker 4>four and later ramp up for Q one Q two

0:02:49.880 --> 0:02:50.440
<v Speaker 4>of next year.

0:02:50.560 --> 0:02:54.640
<v Speaker 9>Fiscally, I mean definitely, it's part of two things. The

0:02:54.800 --> 0:02:58.959
<v Speaker 9>execution they have performed over the last two years have

0:02:59.040 --> 0:03:02.280
<v Speaker 9>been nothing but phenomenal. It's very hard to continue with

0:03:02.400 --> 0:03:06.400
<v Speaker 9>this annual cadence reiterating the new chip designs at time,

0:03:06.639 --> 0:03:08.920
<v Speaker 9>bringing in the supply not just at scale but at

0:03:09.000 --> 0:03:11.680
<v Speaker 9>new technology module. So it's definitely a high bar.

0:03:11.800 --> 0:03:13.959
<v Speaker 5>They have said, I actually want to talk about new

0:03:14.000 --> 0:03:16.959
<v Speaker 5>technology model. There was a question on the Analyst score

0:03:17.240 --> 0:03:19.560
<v Speaker 5>which I also try to get into a Jensen Wang

0:03:20.000 --> 0:03:24.840
<v Speaker 5>about generational upgrades. Right now, H two hundred is ramping

0:03:24.880 --> 0:03:27.000
<v Speaker 5>being deployed in the real world, and before we know it,

0:03:27.080 --> 0:03:30.000
<v Speaker 5>Blackwell's here. So if you're a data center operator, you

0:03:30.120 --> 0:03:32.920
<v Speaker 5>have the option of both potentially at the same time.

0:03:33.160 --> 0:03:34.240
<v Speaker 8>How do you model for that?

0:03:34.800 --> 0:03:37.000
<v Speaker 9>I mean, each data center operator is at a different

0:03:37.040 --> 0:03:39.960
<v Speaker 9>technology stack and a different phase in this journey, right,

0:03:40.000 --> 0:03:42.040
<v Speaker 9>so there has been a pent up demand. So I

0:03:42.080 --> 0:03:44.760
<v Speaker 9>think right now this sort of tier two and low

0:03:44.960 --> 0:03:47.600
<v Speaker 9>enterprises and the new up and comers who are installing

0:03:47.600 --> 0:03:49.640
<v Speaker 9>this base would choose to go for the H two

0:03:49.680 --> 0:03:52.160
<v Speaker 9>hundred and Blackwell is not really for everyone.

0:03:52.320 --> 0:03:54.560
<v Speaker 3>You really need a.

0:03:53.840 --> 0:03:58.160
<v Speaker 9>Significant ROI, significant investment to implement Blackwell.

0:03:58.400 --> 0:04:02.520
<v Speaker 4>What about geographic reach here? Were you worried in any

0:04:02.560 --> 0:04:03.800
<v Speaker 4>way about the China pullback?

0:04:06.200 --> 0:04:07.280
<v Speaker 3>No, I mean there was.

0:04:07.480 --> 0:04:10.640
<v Speaker 9>This is the first time we saw the US decline sequentially.

0:04:11.480 --> 0:04:13.600
<v Speaker 9>We don't think there's a lot to read into it,

0:04:13.640 --> 0:04:16.840
<v Speaker 9>but it definitely outlines that the demand is broadening outside

0:04:16.839 --> 0:04:18.760
<v Speaker 9>of the US. When we look at rest of the

0:04:18.800 --> 0:04:21.440
<v Speaker 9>world other than US over the last few years, the

0:04:21.520 --> 0:04:24.560
<v Speaker 9>growth there has been significantly faster, and that leads to

0:04:24.600 --> 0:04:28.320
<v Speaker 9>that sort of low double digit so and billion dollars

0:04:28.360 --> 0:04:29.560
<v Speaker 9>that Jensen outlined.

0:04:30.520 --> 0:04:33.599
<v Speaker 4>Congen Shavani and has been a busy twenty four hours

0:04:33.600 --> 0:04:33.760
<v Speaker 4>for you.

0:04:33.800 --> 0:04:35.600
<v Speaker 6>We appreciate you pre meg intelligence.

0:04:35.640 --> 0:04:38.840
<v Speaker 4>Meanwhile, let's get a broader market reaction Anthony Singramany is

0:04:38.880 --> 0:04:41.120
<v Speaker 4>with US chief Market stretches that Ameral Price Financial.

0:04:41.279 --> 0:04:44.000
<v Speaker 6>Who would have thought it with all of the handwringing.

0:04:43.640 --> 0:04:45.240
<v Speaker 4>In video is so important to the S and P,

0:04:45.400 --> 0:04:49.040
<v Speaker 4>to the NASDAC of eight percent. Waiting benchmarks are higher

0:04:49.120 --> 0:04:50.120
<v Speaker 4>even though the name is down.

0:04:51.400 --> 0:04:53.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you know, at the beginning of the week we

0:04:53.279 --> 0:04:56.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of said move over power. Here comes Jensen Wong,

0:04:57.200 --> 0:04:59.720
<v Speaker 1>and you're really kind of seeing the markets just kind

0:04:59.720 --> 0:05:03.680
<v Speaker 1>of not really react in videos earnings last night. And

0:05:03.720 --> 0:05:07.840
<v Speaker 1>I think it's because earnings were positive. As Kanja mentioned,

0:05:07.960 --> 0:05:10.159
<v Speaker 1>you know, the wow factor is starting to come down

0:05:10.200 --> 0:05:11.920
<v Speaker 1>because the hurdle rates are getting higher.

0:05:12.040 --> 0:05:13.600
<v Speaker 2>It's getting harder to achieve that.

0:05:14.080 --> 0:05:18.840
<v Speaker 1>But overall, the delivery of profits and outlooks last night

0:05:18.880 --> 0:05:21.640
<v Speaker 1>from in video, we're solid, and so I think the

0:05:21.680 --> 0:05:24.880
<v Speaker 1>market is starting to kind of look forward and say, hey,

0:05:24.920 --> 0:05:28.320
<v Speaker 1>everything's okay with big tech. We're going to move over

0:05:28.440 --> 0:05:31.320
<v Speaker 1>the next couple of quarters. Macro is obviously going to

0:05:31.360 --> 0:05:34.159
<v Speaker 1>be a concern coming here over the next few weeks

0:05:34.200 --> 0:05:36.480
<v Speaker 1>and as we get rate cuts from the FED later

0:05:36.560 --> 0:05:39.840
<v Speaker 1>next month. But I think the story in big tech

0:05:40.360 --> 0:05:44.360
<v Speaker 1>is less homogeneous trading a little bit more focus on

0:05:44.800 --> 0:05:48.120
<v Speaker 1>you know where's the payoff or AI what's the supply

0:05:48.240 --> 0:05:51.320
<v Speaker 1>and demand build for companies like in video moving forward?

0:05:51.680 --> 0:05:54.800
<v Speaker 1>And I think it will likely provide opportunities when when

0:05:54.839 --> 0:05:58.400
<v Speaker 1>we get some of these pullbacks for investors to reassess

0:05:58.440 --> 0:06:01.480
<v Speaker 1>and maybe look at stocks that got away from them

0:06:01.520 --> 0:06:02.400
<v Speaker 1>earlier this year.

0:06:02.920 --> 0:06:04.920
<v Speaker 6>Would you say that in video? I don't want to

0:06:04.920 --> 0:06:06.120
<v Speaker 6>go into individual names.

0:06:05.920 --> 0:06:10.760
<v Speaker 4>But would you say these sorts of valuations when today Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, Meta, Google,

0:06:10.839 --> 0:06:13.800
<v Speaker 4>Tesla are all the top performers in terms of points

0:06:13.800 --> 0:06:16.159
<v Speaker 4>in the S and P five hundred, should you be

0:06:16.320 --> 0:06:17.840
<v Speaker 4>wrapping up more in technology?

0:06:17.880 --> 0:06:20.560
<v Speaker 6>With valuations at these levels, you.

0:06:21.040 --> 0:06:23.960
<v Speaker 1>At the top, as you said, like equal weights in

0:06:24.000 --> 0:06:27.600
<v Speaker 1>these companies, and in technology just holding an equal weight

0:06:27.800 --> 0:06:30.560
<v Speaker 1>is thirty forty percent of the S and P five hundred.

0:06:30.640 --> 0:06:32.400
<v Speaker 1>So I don't think you need to get over your

0:06:32.440 --> 0:06:37.720
<v Speaker 1>skis around you extending psitioning in these areas. But when

0:06:37.800 --> 0:06:42.800
<v Speaker 1>we do see pullbacks in these big tech leaders, this

0:06:42.880 --> 0:06:45.119
<v Speaker 1>is the time to start looking at them, at least

0:06:45.520 --> 0:06:48.760
<v Speaker 1>if you've underweighted the area. Our view is that there

0:06:48.839 --> 0:06:52.080
<v Speaker 1>is a broader group of stocks that are more attractive.

0:06:52.600 --> 0:06:56.600
<v Speaker 1>They're particularly more attractive as earnings growth expectations are moving

0:06:56.680 --> 0:07:00.000
<v Speaker 1>higher for outside for areas outside of the big tech.

0:07:00.200 --> 0:07:03.120
<v Speaker 1>The economy seems to be on firm footing. The GDP

0:07:03.200 --> 0:07:06.400
<v Speaker 1>grew by three percent in the second quarter, and the

0:07:06.440 --> 0:07:10.200
<v Speaker 1>Fed is likely to start their you know, their moves

0:07:10.240 --> 0:07:12.360
<v Speaker 1>to lower rates over the next few months and a

0:07:12.400 --> 0:07:15.760
<v Speaker 1>few quarters. So the outlook for the rest of the

0:07:15.800 --> 0:07:19.000
<v Speaker 1>four hundred and ninety three stocks that aren't the Magnificent

0:07:19.120 --> 0:07:22.040
<v Speaker 1>seven are starting to look more attractive. And that's what

0:07:22.040 --> 0:07:25.960
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing this month. Consumer staples, healthcare utilities. They're all

0:07:26.000 --> 0:07:28.800
<v Speaker 1>at the top of the charts for August, and that

0:07:28.920 --> 0:07:31.800
<v Speaker 1>might be because September is a pretty poor month for

0:07:31.840 --> 0:07:32.320
<v Speaker 1>the market.

0:07:33.560 --> 0:07:36.360
<v Speaker 5>And see that's a pretty sweet Bloomberg terminal chot over

0:07:36.360 --> 0:07:40.000
<v Speaker 5>your left shoulder. What is that that's in video quarterly revenues.

0:07:40.840 --> 0:07:42.000
<v Speaker 2>That's right, that's right.

0:07:42.040 --> 0:07:44.040
<v Speaker 1>And as the chart if you can see it in

0:07:44.080 --> 0:07:47.679
<v Speaker 1>the back, it shows the actuals and the estimates starting

0:07:47.720 --> 0:07:48.400
<v Speaker 1>to get closer.

0:07:48.480 --> 0:07:50.320
<v Speaker 2>And I think that's why you're seeing A.

0:07:51.840 --> 0:07:55.160
<v Speaker 1>Get more trouble start moving higher, even though they had

0:07:55.160 --> 0:07:56.360
<v Speaker 1>great results last night.

0:07:56.760 --> 0:07:59.040
<v Speaker 5>So bear with me. I have a chot of my own.

0:07:59.160 --> 0:08:01.680
<v Speaker 5>Let's bring it up. This is the beat in the

0:08:01.760 --> 0:08:05.920
<v Speaker 5>quarter relative to expectations, and I think the point is

0:08:06.600 --> 0:08:08.680
<v Speaker 5>that it was a It was a four percent beat

0:08:08.720 --> 0:08:11.400
<v Speaker 5>against consensus, right, four percent upside surprise.

0:08:13.120 --> 0:08:14.840
<v Speaker 8>Have you ever experienced a quarter like.

0:08:14.800 --> 0:08:18.440
<v Speaker 5>This where everyone has just lost their absolute minds over

0:08:18.480 --> 0:08:21.320
<v Speaker 5>a single name in a week where we had Central

0:08:21.360 --> 0:08:24.440
<v Speaker 5>Bank speakers left, right and center and more economic data

0:08:24.440 --> 0:08:27.360
<v Speaker 5>that we can fit into a one hour program.

0:08:27.960 --> 0:08:30.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, no, I mean I think the last and you

0:08:30.320 --> 0:08:32.720
<v Speaker 1>started at volatility spike in early August.

0:08:32.760 --> 0:08:35.800
<v Speaker 2>Some of that was the japan Yen Carrie trade.

0:08:35.960 --> 0:08:40.200
<v Speaker 1>But I do think expectations are really high in these

0:08:40.320 --> 0:08:43.840
<v Speaker 1>big tech, magnificent names, and so not only do they

0:08:43.880 --> 0:08:47.360
<v Speaker 1>have to surpass and kind of meet the perfection standards

0:08:47.360 --> 0:08:49.800
<v Speaker 1>that investors put on it, but they actually need to

0:08:49.800 --> 0:08:53.200
<v Speaker 1>surpass them by even more. That's getting harder and so

0:08:53.400 --> 0:08:55.800
<v Speaker 1>as as my earlier comments said, I think you're going

0:08:55.880 --> 0:08:59.439
<v Speaker 1>to see more less homogeneous trading between some of these

0:08:59.480 --> 0:09:02.240
<v Speaker 1>big tech leaders, and it's really going to come down

0:09:02.240 --> 0:09:06.600
<v Speaker 1>to fundamentals and capital spending and what's the revenue outlook, how.

0:09:06.559 --> 0:09:07.600
<v Speaker 2>Much are you beating?

0:09:07.960 --> 0:09:11.080
<v Speaker 1>Those things will play a much more dominant role in

0:09:11.120 --> 0:09:14.160
<v Speaker 1>moving share prices around. But at the same at the

0:09:14.240 --> 0:09:16.920
<v Speaker 1>same you know, the same brath. You have a lot

0:09:16.960 --> 0:09:19.560
<v Speaker 1>of stocks that have not kept pace with these big

0:09:19.600 --> 0:09:23.960
<v Speaker 1>tech companies that remain attractive in an environment where we're growing.

0:09:24.040 --> 0:09:26.760
<v Speaker 1>And so if the FED is cutting interest rates and

0:09:26.800 --> 0:09:30.200
<v Speaker 1>they can kind of engineer that soft landing, there's a

0:09:30.240 --> 0:09:33.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of sectors of the economy that are more attractive today.

0:09:34.400 --> 0:09:38.160
<v Speaker 5>So let's finish here in aggregate Nvidia and everything else.

0:09:37.960 --> 0:09:38.880
<v Speaker 8>That you've outlined.

0:09:39.600 --> 0:09:44.120
<v Speaker 5>Do you believe that this cycle, the investment cycle around

0:09:44.160 --> 0:09:46.720
<v Speaker 5>AI is intact and it continues.

0:09:47.920 --> 0:09:50.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think you know, and from your interview with

0:09:51.000 --> 0:09:54.760
<v Speaker 1>Jensen Wong, I think it's very clear the AI infrastructure

0:09:54.800 --> 0:09:57.320
<v Speaker 1>build and the architecture around that is in the very

0:09:57.360 --> 0:10:02.800
<v Speaker 1>early innings. Some of these companies like Microsoft, Amazon, Meta Alphabet,

0:10:03.080 --> 0:10:05.959
<v Speaker 1>they spent almost sixty billion dollars in the prior quarter

0:10:06.120 --> 0:10:09.280
<v Speaker 1>on AI investment. They said they were going to continue

0:10:09.280 --> 0:10:12.560
<v Speaker 1>that over the next several quarters. And so as these

0:10:12.679 --> 0:10:17.120
<v Speaker 1>companies and as sovereign AI that Nvidia mentioned last night,

0:10:17.160 --> 0:10:21.000
<v Speaker 1>as these countries start to build that infrastructure, there is

0:10:21.080 --> 0:10:24.679
<v Speaker 1>a lot of opportunities still left in AI. However, like

0:10:24.840 --> 0:10:27.760
<v Speaker 1>the like the tech boom in their early late nineties

0:10:27.760 --> 0:10:31.360
<v Speaker 1>early two thousand we go through periods where expectations get

0:10:31.400 --> 0:10:34.560
<v Speaker 1>really high, they need to reset, and then maybe stocks

0:10:34.600 --> 0:10:36.720
<v Speaker 1>can move higher from there. And I think we're starting

0:10:36.760 --> 0:10:39.800
<v Speaker 1>to see that now with big tech and the AI theme.

0:10:40.920 --> 0:10:44.599
<v Speaker 5>Ansney sagem Bene, chief market strategist in Americaprise Financially you

0:10:44.640 --> 0:10:48.560
<v Speaker 5>believe thank you now, coming out of a conversation with

0:10:48.679 --> 0:10:52.760
<v Speaker 5>Max Levchin, CEO of a firm following yesterday's pretty strong

0:10:52.760 --> 0:10:54.839
<v Speaker 5>earnings report, car you're looking at another name.

0:10:55.280 --> 0:10:58.880
<v Speaker 4>I AM firms up, CrowdStrike up as well, more than

0:10:58.920 --> 0:11:02.199
<v Speaker 4>five percent. This isn't reporting second quarter sales that basically

0:11:02.240 --> 0:11:04.400
<v Speaker 4>top tenas estimates. Remember we were all worrying about the

0:11:04.440 --> 0:11:07.800
<v Speaker 4>global IT outage back in July, but it doesn't seem

0:11:07.880 --> 0:11:11.960
<v Speaker 4>to have had an immediate, as bad a result impact.

0:11:12.400 --> 0:11:13.120
<v Speaker 6>We're currently higher.

0:11:13.200 --> 0:11:28.320
<v Speaker 5>Sublombo Technology, a firm delivering better than expected earning, sending

0:11:28.360 --> 0:11:31.920
<v Speaker 5>shares upwards. The company's fourth quarter revenue and first quarter

0:11:32.280 --> 0:11:36.560
<v Speaker 5>revenue forecast both coming in ahead of estimate, CEO Max

0:11:36.640 --> 0:11:41.160
<v Speaker 5>Levchin saying the company had quote a killer quarter.

0:11:42.120 --> 0:11:43.720
<v Speaker 8>Max joins us now here in San Francisco.

0:11:43.800 --> 0:11:46.680
<v Speaker 5>I spent enough time with you to know that when

0:11:46.720 --> 0:11:50.280
<v Speaker 5>you say something like that, you mean it. I wouldn't

0:11:50.280 --> 0:11:53.800
<v Speaker 5>say that you're prone to superlatives like that. Why why

0:11:53.840 --> 0:11:54.600
<v Speaker 5>a killer quarter?

0:11:56.200 --> 0:11:57.360
<v Speaker 3>Numbers speak for themselves.

0:11:58.320 --> 0:11:59.319
<v Speaker 8>I'll go beyond that.

0:11:59.360 --> 0:12:01.640
<v Speaker 5>Come on, tell me the story of what's happening behind

0:12:01.640 --> 0:12:03.280
<v Speaker 5>your platform and your user base.

0:12:04.320 --> 0:12:05.800
<v Speaker 3>I think there's a real momentum.

0:12:05.920 --> 0:12:09.840
<v Speaker 11>You can tell by looking at our metrics and the

0:12:10.040 --> 0:12:13.040
<v Speaker 11>qualitative measures that we take, and just the fact that

0:12:13.200 --> 0:12:16.160
<v Speaker 11>we've outperformed the credit card industry, which is our direct

0:12:16.160 --> 0:12:19.360
<v Speaker 11>competitor in terms of managing credit, and just the sheer

0:12:19.440 --> 0:12:22.320
<v Speaker 11>number of launchers and merchant signings. Every metric that I

0:12:22.320 --> 0:12:25.040
<v Speaker 11>could cast my eye on, say, wow, that is a

0:12:25.080 --> 0:12:25.840
<v Speaker 11>really good quarter.

0:12:26.040 --> 0:12:27.600
<v Speaker 3>So you know, sometimes we got to take a bath.

0:12:29.320 --> 0:12:32.440
<v Speaker 5>Let's say the buy now pay Lata space is let's

0:12:32.440 --> 0:12:35.400
<v Speaker 5>say more competitive since last year on the program. Maybe

0:12:35.400 --> 0:12:37.640
<v Speaker 5>in that time. Caroline and I spoke with the Klan,

0:12:37.679 --> 0:12:41.560
<v Speaker 5>the CEO, for example. They seem very optimistic, particularly about

0:12:41.600 --> 0:12:45.880
<v Speaker 5>the United States. Yet you continue to grow. I don't

0:12:45.920 --> 0:12:48.560
<v Speaker 5>have the data for market share, but could you just

0:12:48.640 --> 0:12:51.280
<v Speaker 5>contextualize your performance in that sense?

0:12:51.840 --> 0:12:54.640
<v Speaker 11>Well, I think we are outpacing them reasonably well in

0:12:54.720 --> 0:12:56.600
<v Speaker 11>terms of our growth relative to there is at least

0:12:56.600 --> 0:13:00.600
<v Speaker 11>according to the stated numbers, not that I am competitive,

0:13:01.040 --> 0:13:06.079
<v Speaker 11>but I'm very competitive, let's be honest. But the reality

0:13:06.120 --> 0:13:08.160
<v Speaker 11>is it's a giant market and all of us together

0:13:08.200 --> 0:13:10.080
<v Speaker 11>at up to less than ten percent of e commerce,

0:13:10.280 --> 0:13:12.520
<v Speaker 11>and all of us are now looking at offline and

0:13:12.600 --> 0:13:17.000
<v Speaker 11>so just the real share taking that's taking place is

0:13:17.000 --> 0:13:20.600
<v Speaker 11>happening against cash, against credit cards, against debit cards, all

0:13:20.640 --> 0:13:23.280
<v Speaker 11>the other payment types, and so there's just an incredible

0:13:23.320 --> 0:13:25.520
<v Speaker 11>amount of road available to all of us.

0:13:25.520 --> 0:13:27.480
<v Speaker 3>And a firm in particular, what.

0:13:27.440 --> 0:13:31.200
<v Speaker 4>Does that mean in terms of the macro context? Then, Max,

0:13:31.400 --> 0:13:34.640
<v Speaker 4>how confident are you of the US consumer the global

0:13:34.679 --> 0:13:35.600
<v Speaker 4>consumer right now?

0:13:37.120 --> 0:13:39.240
<v Speaker 11>Well, we're about to launch in the UK, so we'll

0:13:39.240 --> 0:13:41.920
<v Speaker 11>find out exactly how confident I should be about the

0:13:41.960 --> 0:13:45.360
<v Speaker 11>UK consumer. But the US consumer again, look at our

0:13:45.559 --> 0:13:49.920
<v Speaker 11>investor supplement. Credit card companies have built and built and

0:13:49.960 --> 0:13:53.440
<v Speaker 11>built up their delinquencies, and ours remained very firmly in control.

0:13:53.880 --> 0:13:57.520
<v Speaker 11>Our consumer is borrowing and shopping and paying back, which

0:13:57.600 --> 0:13:59.120
<v Speaker 11>is really important for our credit business.

0:13:59.640 --> 0:14:02.880
<v Speaker 3>But so far, so good. We do not see a

0:14:02.920 --> 0:14:03.720
<v Speaker 3>major slowdown.

0:14:03.760 --> 0:14:06.760
<v Speaker 11>We do not see a significant pullback and demand there's

0:14:06.760 --> 0:14:09.839
<v Speaker 11>always new industries. A quarter or two ago, I was

0:14:09.960 --> 0:14:12.680
<v Speaker 11>lamenting the loss of interest and electronics. It came back

0:14:12.800 --> 0:14:16.840
<v Speaker 11>roaring through the last quarter, travels a little bit softer.

0:14:16.960 --> 0:14:19.400
<v Speaker 3>I think people got their COVID post COVID fix.

0:14:19.800 --> 0:14:25.880
<v Speaker 11>But all in all, consumer is effectively shopping and buying

0:14:25.920 --> 0:14:28.280
<v Speaker 11>and paying back and I don't see problems.

0:14:28.720 --> 0:14:31.240
<v Speaker 4>Meanwhile, you're taking a bow and the market in particular

0:14:31.840 --> 0:14:35.840
<v Speaker 4>likes the focus on profitability. Now I hate to bring

0:14:35.840 --> 0:14:38.520
<v Speaker 4>them up again, but Karner actually did post a profit,

0:14:38.800 --> 0:14:40.600
<v Speaker 4>even though they're still a private company that eying a

0:14:40.600 --> 0:14:44.280
<v Speaker 4>twenty billion dollar valuation and they're cunning costs by leaning

0:14:44.360 --> 0:14:46.280
<v Speaker 4>into AI. Is that something that you look at, Max,

0:14:46.360 --> 0:14:47.920
<v Speaker 4>something that you feel you have to compete into.

0:14:50.040 --> 0:14:53.000
<v Speaker 11>Well, good news is that we've been in the AI

0:14:54.000 --> 0:14:58.160
<v Speaker 11>business since inception. So one percent of our loans are

0:14:58.280 --> 0:15:02.160
<v Speaker 11>underwritten individually. Every single time I'm entirely buying machines, and

0:15:02.200 --> 0:15:04.920
<v Speaker 11>so we've been on the machine learning and AI training

0:15:05.040 --> 0:15:05.880
<v Speaker 11>since base Eero.

0:15:06.040 --> 0:15:07.200
<v Speaker 3>And we don't think of.

0:15:07.200 --> 0:15:09.920
<v Speaker 11>It as a way to replace humans or to get

0:15:10.000 --> 0:15:11.840
<v Speaker 11>rid of humans. We think of it as a great

0:15:11.880 --> 0:15:16.000
<v Speaker 11>tool for increasing productivity, to give us an edge in

0:15:16.160 --> 0:15:19.160
<v Speaker 11>underwriting customer service, et cetera.

0:15:19.280 --> 0:15:21.120
<v Speaker 3>And so yes, we're very, very active in AI.

0:15:21.160 --> 0:15:23.760
<v Speaker 11>We have lots of really fun things happening, both visible

0:15:23.840 --> 0:15:27.280
<v Speaker 11>and not to the investor eye. But it's a huge

0:15:27.280 --> 0:15:30.720
<v Speaker 11>part of what we do in terms of profitability. You know,

0:15:31.200 --> 0:15:32.600
<v Speaker 11>I said it last night on the Earning Skull, and

0:15:32.600 --> 0:15:34.640
<v Speaker 11>I just want to make sure I repeated this was

0:15:34.720 --> 0:15:38.120
<v Speaker 11>not a contortionist thing we just did when we said, hey,

0:15:38.480 --> 0:15:40.360
<v Speaker 11>profitability is on the horizon.

0:15:40.720 --> 0:15:42.560
<v Speaker 3>It is very much part of the plan. It's always

0:15:42.560 --> 0:15:43.280
<v Speaker 3>been part of the plan.

0:15:43.760 --> 0:15:46.040
<v Speaker 11>It's just now close enough where I can say, here's

0:15:46.040 --> 0:15:48.120
<v Speaker 11>a date with history. We're going to get Gap profitable

0:15:48.160 --> 0:15:49.640
<v Speaker 11>and move right past it and do more.

0:15:50.640 --> 0:15:53.400
<v Speaker 5>Max and Carol also bear with me that I am

0:15:53.560 --> 0:15:55.840
<v Speaker 5>a firm customer in the sense that you know, I

0:15:55.960 --> 0:15:58.960
<v Speaker 5>used the firm to finance a specific thing for what

0:15:59.000 --> 0:16:01.440
<v Speaker 5>it's worth. It was the Peloton tread. But the reason

0:16:01.480 --> 0:16:03.640
<v Speaker 5>I did it is actually emphsis some point of sale.

0:16:03.880 --> 0:16:05.840
<v Speaker 5>So when you go through the audience issubmitted, if you

0:16:05.840 --> 0:16:08.640
<v Speaker 5>go and try buy something from Peloton, it's kind of

0:16:08.680 --> 0:16:10.880
<v Speaker 5>a weird transaction, but you're presented with the firm as

0:16:10.920 --> 0:16:15.240
<v Speaker 5>an option almost straight away. Do you negotiate that aggressively

0:16:15.840 --> 0:16:20.640
<v Speaker 5>for those kind of bigger ticket items, I'm.

0:16:20.520 --> 0:16:24.840
<v Speaker 11>Not sure individual deals are worth commenting on. But every

0:16:24.960 --> 0:16:27.000
<v Speaker 11>deal where we are presented at the point of sale,

0:16:27.520 --> 0:16:30.320
<v Speaker 11>and every deal where you see it up funnel as

0:16:30.440 --> 0:16:32.760
<v Speaker 11>what might call it before you even get into the checkouts,

0:16:33.320 --> 0:16:36.840
<v Speaker 11>are absolutely directly integrated. So we go to the merchant,

0:16:37.000 --> 0:16:38.920
<v Speaker 11>we spend a lot of time with them making sure

0:16:38.960 --> 0:16:42.359
<v Speaker 11>that we are as helpful as possible to their ability

0:16:42.520 --> 0:16:46.280
<v Speaker 11>to sell, be it a Pelton tread or a mattress or.

0:16:46.200 --> 0:16:48.960
<v Speaker 3>Anything in between. And that is what gives us a

0:16:49.040 --> 0:16:49.640
<v Speaker 3>huge advantage.

0:16:49.680 --> 0:16:52.480
<v Speaker 11>The consumer has the confidence and the clarity of what

0:16:52.520 --> 0:16:54.480
<v Speaker 11>it might cost them to borrow money to buy something.

0:16:54.760 --> 0:16:55.000
<v Speaker 8>Max.

0:16:55.360 --> 0:16:57.080
<v Speaker 5>While you're here, could I please ask you, as a

0:16:57.120 --> 0:17:00.240
<v Speaker 5>story out from Blomberg Law about a firm face sing

0:17:00.240 --> 0:17:04.840
<v Speaker 5>a class action suit after the Evolved bank breach situation,

0:17:06.480 --> 0:17:07.439
<v Speaker 5>comment on that please.

0:17:07.920 --> 0:17:11.480
<v Speaker 11>Probably a very bad idea to comment and ongoing or

0:17:11.560 --> 0:17:13.880
<v Speaker 11>potential future litigation, so I'm not sure I have anything

0:17:13.920 --> 0:17:16.480
<v Speaker 11>to say on that. You know, I said it the

0:17:16.600 --> 0:17:20.960
<v Speaker 11>day of Evolved news, which is certainly unfortunate that the

0:17:20.960 --> 0:17:23.320
<v Speaker 11>firm card numbers were all safe. We did not need

0:17:23.359 --> 0:17:26.560
<v Speaker 11>to rotate them and give people new cards. That is

0:17:26.600 --> 0:17:29.520
<v Speaker 11>now confirmed no card numbers have been leaked and our

0:17:29.560 --> 0:17:31.639
<v Speaker 11>consumers are safe. If you have your firm card, please

0:17:31.640 --> 0:17:32.520
<v Speaker 11>continue using it.

0:17:32.520 --> 0:17:33.240
<v Speaker 3>It works just fine.

0:17:33.359 --> 0:17:33.679
<v Speaker 8>Thank you.

0:17:34.320 --> 0:17:36.119
<v Speaker 4>Thanks Love Chin, It's always great to have you on

0:17:36.160 --> 0:17:38.879
<v Speaker 4>the show. We appreciate it. It's taking about the CEO

0:17:39.000 --> 0:17:39.800
<v Speaker 4>of a firm today.

0:17:48.320 --> 0:17:52.640
<v Speaker 5>Telegram ceo Pavel durov was charged in France for complicity

0:17:53.040 --> 0:17:56.360
<v Speaker 5>in the spread of sexual images of children and other crimes.

0:17:56.400 --> 0:17:58.040
<v Speaker 8>It's a rare example of.

0:17:57.960 --> 0:18:00.879
<v Speaker 5>A tech leader being held liable for the way their

0:18:01.040 --> 0:18:03.359
<v Speaker 5>platform is used. I want to get right to the

0:18:03.400 --> 0:18:06.679
<v Speaker 5>details with Bloomberg's Allan Katz or Paris bureau chief, and

0:18:06.720 --> 0:18:09.760
<v Speaker 5>I think fill in the details. My understanding is Duroff

0:18:09.880 --> 0:18:12.280
<v Speaker 5>is out on a significant bail and there is a

0:18:12.320 --> 0:18:13.280
<v Speaker 5>process to come.

0:18:16.080 --> 0:18:19.440
<v Speaker 12>So he is out of the sort of a holding

0:18:19.440 --> 0:18:21.600
<v Speaker 12>cells the way they do it in France. From that

0:18:21.640 --> 0:18:24.800
<v Speaker 12>four day interrogation that he had before being presented to

0:18:24.840 --> 0:18:27.760
<v Speaker 12>the judge, he had to post a five million euro

0:18:28.000 --> 0:18:30.480
<v Speaker 12>bond for that, so that's about five and a half

0:18:30.520 --> 0:18:32.960
<v Speaker 12>million dollars, so it's a lot of money. That said,

0:18:33.640 --> 0:18:37.760
<v Speaker 12>he's according to Bloomberg's you know, wealth ranking, he's quite

0:18:37.760 --> 0:18:39.680
<v Speaker 12>a wealthy fellow, and so he could certainly afford it.

0:18:40.560 --> 0:18:43.800
<v Speaker 12>And from here on out, at least according to the

0:18:43.800 --> 0:18:46.600
<v Speaker 12>initial ruling from what's called a jugually liberte, he has

0:18:46.640 --> 0:18:49.800
<v Speaker 12>to check in twice a week with authorities to make

0:18:49.840 --> 0:18:51.480
<v Speaker 12>sure that he's still in France and he's not allowed

0:18:51.480 --> 0:18:52.440
<v Speaker 12>to leave the country.

0:18:53.000 --> 0:18:53.720
<v Speaker 3>So that's sort of.

0:18:53.640 --> 0:18:56.160
<v Speaker 12>The process in the immediate future. And now it goes

0:18:56.200 --> 0:18:58.879
<v Speaker 12>to an investigation where the investigating magistrate will continue to

0:18:58.880 --> 0:19:02.440
<v Speaker 12>look into the case, and that could take months, could

0:19:02.480 --> 0:19:06.320
<v Speaker 12>take a year longer, Like, it's really unclear how long

0:19:06.600 --> 0:19:08.399
<v Speaker 12>the rest of this process might take beyond that.

0:19:09.000 --> 0:19:13.159
<v Speaker 4>And really the case here is that dura off Telegram,

0:19:13.200 --> 0:19:17.600
<v Speaker 4>which is CEO of basically in no way helps when

0:19:17.640 --> 0:19:20.600
<v Speaker 4>it comes to investigations. They refuse, it said, to run

0:19:20.680 --> 0:19:24.240
<v Speaker 4>legal wire taps on suspects, particularly when it comes to

0:19:24.680 --> 0:19:29.440
<v Speaker 4>organized criminals and particularly sexual exploitation of children. Is that

0:19:29.480 --> 0:19:31.719
<v Speaker 4>really wants at heart here, the fact that he doesn't

0:19:31.760 --> 0:19:33.920
<v Speaker 4>want to take any movement, any action as a leader

0:19:33.960 --> 0:19:36.960
<v Speaker 4>of a social media platform.

0:19:37.359 --> 0:19:41.800
<v Speaker 12>Well, yes, The action though that you're talking about is

0:19:41.880 --> 0:19:46.600
<v Speaker 12>he doesn't he deliberately, according to French officials, he deliberately

0:19:46.640 --> 0:19:50.160
<v Speaker 12>did not respond to or applied to what they call

0:19:50.320 --> 0:19:54.960
<v Speaker 12>legitimate requests for informational for help in other investigations that

0:19:55.040 --> 0:19:57.560
<v Speaker 12>were running in criminal activities that they saw on the

0:19:57.640 --> 0:20:01.320
<v Speaker 12>Telegram network. And that's different than the way that most

0:20:01.440 --> 0:20:06.320
<v Speaker 12>other messaging services operate, and that's really why they issued

0:20:06.320 --> 0:20:07.879
<v Speaker 12>the arrest warrant for him in the first place. And

0:20:07.920 --> 0:20:10.760
<v Speaker 12>the prosecutor made a point of that in the statement

0:20:10.840 --> 0:20:14.159
<v Speaker 12>last night, saying that was really what was particular about

0:20:14.240 --> 0:20:18.199
<v Speaker 12>Telegram as a platform, and not just in France, but

0:20:18.560 --> 0:20:21.360
<v Speaker 12>she specifically mentioned Belgium as well as having the same

0:20:21.440 --> 0:20:23.960
<v Speaker 12>issues with Telegram.

0:20:23.280 --> 0:20:27.080
<v Speaker 4>A near complete lack of response, as pass prosecutor put it,

0:20:27.119 --> 0:20:36.800
<v Speaker 4>we appreciate it. Alan Katz, thank you, Welcome back to

0:20:36.800 --> 0:20:39.400
<v Speaker 4>Blue meg Technology. And Caroline Hide in New York and.

0:20:39.359 --> 0:20:41.560
<v Speaker 8>I met Ludlow in San Francisco, and I.

0:20:41.480 --> 0:20:43.280
<v Speaker 4>Just want to point out what is happening on the

0:20:43.280 --> 0:20:46.919
<v Speaker 4>markets today because we've had so much anxiety around this

0:20:47.040 --> 0:20:50.199
<v Speaker 4>one name, all around Nvidia, the fact that it was

0:20:50.240 --> 0:20:52.240
<v Speaker 4>the most crucial that it had ever been to the market.

0:20:52.320 --> 0:20:54.879
<v Speaker 4>It's eight percent waiting in the NASDAC, it's six percent

0:20:54.920 --> 0:20:57.520
<v Speaker 4>waiting in the SMP would mean that the direction of

0:20:57.560 --> 0:21:00.639
<v Speaker 4>travel after earnings would dictate that for the benchmark, not

0:21:00.880 --> 0:21:03.159
<v Speaker 4>so we're currently up one point one percent, but then

0:21:03.200 --> 0:21:06.439
<v Speaker 4>has that one hundred despite it's fourteen percent waiting in

0:21:06.480 --> 0:21:09.119
<v Speaker 4>the socks. We're up one point four percent and it

0:21:09.160 --> 0:21:11.480
<v Speaker 4>is lower by three point six percent. The reason is lower,

0:21:11.560 --> 0:21:14.560
<v Speaker 4>of course, d is what you poured over yesterday was

0:21:14.560 --> 0:21:17.199
<v Speaker 4>the fact that, yes, it's still beat in its quarter

0:21:17.280 --> 0:21:19.720
<v Speaker 4>that was just announced, and the fact that its forecast

0:21:19.760 --> 0:21:22.240
<v Speaker 4>looked pretty decent. But it was some of the issues

0:21:22.240 --> 0:21:25.159
<v Speaker 4>that ramp up in Blackwell in particular that caused a

0:21:25.200 --> 0:21:26.480
<v Speaker 4>little bit of uncertainty.

0:21:26.520 --> 0:21:28.120
<v Speaker 6>And you spoke to the CEO just about that.

0:21:28.920 --> 0:21:29.280
<v Speaker 3>I did.

0:21:29.359 --> 0:21:32.480
<v Speaker 5>I did speak with Nvidia CEO Jensen Wang following what

0:21:32.600 --> 0:21:34.919
<v Speaker 5>was kind of seen as a disappointing earnings report, so

0:21:35.040 --> 0:21:37.639
<v Speaker 5>bizarre to say that out loud. He laid out his

0:21:37.840 --> 0:21:41.880
<v Speaker 5>and the company's expectations for next year surrounding the production

0:21:42.160 --> 0:21:43.080
<v Speaker 5>of Blackwell chips.

0:21:43.119 --> 0:21:43.560
<v Speaker 8>Listen to this.

0:21:46.200 --> 0:21:49.400
<v Speaker 7>We made a mass change to improve the yield. Functionality

0:21:49.440 --> 0:21:52.639
<v Speaker 7>of Blackwell is wonderful. We're sampling Blackwell all over the

0:21:52.680 --> 0:21:58.919
<v Speaker 7>world today. We show people giving tours to people of

0:21:59.000 --> 0:22:02.280
<v Speaker 7>the Blackwall systems we have up and running. You could

0:22:02.359 --> 0:22:06.520
<v Speaker 7>find pictures of Blackwell systems all over the web. We

0:22:06.600 --> 0:22:11.960
<v Speaker 7>have started volume production volume. Production will ship in Q four.

0:22:12.520 --> 0:22:15.879
<v Speaker 7>Q four, we will have billions of dollars.

0:22:15.440 --> 0:22:18.080
<v Speaker 2>Of Blackwell revenues and.

0:22:19.480 --> 0:22:22.320
<v Speaker 3>We will ramp from there. We will ramp from there.

0:22:22.800 --> 0:22:28.080
<v Speaker 7>The demand for Blackwell far exceeds its supply, of course

0:22:28.160 --> 0:22:31.919
<v Speaker 7>in the beginning, because the demand is so great. But

0:22:32.200 --> 0:22:34.880
<v Speaker 7>we're going to have lots and lots of supply and

0:22:35.240 --> 0:22:38.359
<v Speaker 7>we will be able to ramp. Starting in Q four

0:22:39.080 --> 0:22:41.840
<v Speaker 7>we have billions of dollars of revenues, and we will

0:22:41.880 --> 0:22:43.960
<v Speaker 7>ramp from there into Q one, into Q two and

0:22:44.000 --> 0:22:44.680
<v Speaker 7>two next year.

0:22:45.000 --> 0:22:46.520
<v Speaker 10>We're going to have a great next year as well.

0:22:47.680 --> 0:22:50.920
<v Speaker 5>Jensen, what is the demand for accelerated computing beyond the

0:22:51.000 --> 0:22:52.760
<v Speaker 5>hyperscalers and meta.

0:22:54.359 --> 0:22:59.119
<v Speaker 7>Hyperscalers represent about forty five percent of our total data

0:22:59.160 --> 0:23:04.520
<v Speaker 7>center business. We're relatively diversified today. We have hyperscalers, we

0:23:04.600 --> 0:23:10.879
<v Speaker 7>have Internet service providers, we have sovereign ais, we have

0:23:12.200 --> 0:23:18.840
<v Speaker 7>industries enterprises, so it's fairly fairly diversified a site outside

0:23:18.840 --> 0:23:21.000
<v Speaker 7>of hyperscalers.

0:23:21.600 --> 0:23:22.760
<v Speaker 3>The other fifty five percent.

0:23:23.720 --> 0:23:28.320
<v Speaker 7>Now, the application use across all of that, all of

0:23:28.359 --> 0:23:34.199
<v Speaker 7>that data center starts with accelerated computing. Accelerated computing does everything,

0:23:34.240 --> 0:23:39.000
<v Speaker 7>of course, from Well the models the things that we

0:23:39.040 --> 0:23:42.840
<v Speaker 7>know about, which is generative AI, and that gets most

0:23:42.880 --> 0:23:45.800
<v Speaker 7>of the attention. But at the core we also do

0:23:46.760 --> 0:23:53.239
<v Speaker 7>database processing, pre and post processing of data before you

0:23:53.840 --> 0:23:59.679
<v Speaker 7>use it for generative AI, trans coding, scientific simulations, computer

0:23:59.720 --> 0:24:03.200
<v Speaker 7>graph of course, image processing of course, and so there's

0:24:03.520 --> 0:24:08.080
<v Speaker 7>tons of applications that people use are accelerated computing for,

0:24:08.840 --> 0:24:10.920
<v Speaker 7>and one of them is generative AI.

0:24:13.600 --> 0:24:16.239
<v Speaker 5>That was in Vidia c Jensen one speaking mate with

0:24:16.320 --> 0:24:19.880
<v Speaker 5>me last night, Cara, and yeah, I mean body language,

0:24:19.920 --> 0:24:20.600
<v Speaker 5>what he's wearing.

0:24:20.640 --> 0:24:21.760
<v Speaker 8>There's a lot to talk about.

0:24:22.440 --> 0:24:25.359
<v Speaker 4>No lever ed no lever who wore a vomber jacket.

0:24:25.400 --> 0:24:27.840
<v Speaker 4>But look, there is a lot of deep diving on

0:24:27.880 --> 0:24:30.359
<v Speaker 4>the numbers in particular, and let's get some of that

0:24:30.400 --> 0:24:32.280
<v Speaker 4>reaction from our guests on Bloomberg TV.

0:24:33.480 --> 0:24:34.320
<v Speaker 10>I'm not concerned.

0:24:34.359 --> 0:24:37.360
<v Speaker 1>I think if you look at Nvidia, they still control

0:24:37.440 --> 0:24:40.520
<v Speaker 1>this market and will continue to I would say, dominate

0:24:40.560 --> 0:24:42.240
<v Speaker 1>this space over the next three to five years.

0:24:42.359 --> 0:24:47.360
<v Speaker 13>Delivering chips at this rate, at this scale is fantastic

0:24:47.400 --> 0:24:50.520
<v Speaker 13>and unprecedented. I don't think there's much of a revenue

0:24:50.520 --> 0:24:53.399
<v Speaker 13>issue here, of a growth issue here. I think a

0:24:53.440 --> 0:24:56.600
<v Speaker 13>little bit of a pushback is probably more around the

0:24:56.640 --> 0:24:58.720
<v Speaker 13>margin situation, that type.

0:24:58.520 --> 0:25:01.280
<v Speaker 5>Of growth isn't necessarily re realistic or sustainable in the

0:25:01.280 --> 0:25:04.640
<v Speaker 5>long term. Two it's not necessary the long term either.

0:25:04.760 --> 0:25:07.440
<v Speaker 14>At the end of the day, we still sense enormous

0:25:07.640 --> 0:25:10.560
<v Speaker 14>an urgent demand across the board, and that really mitigates,

0:25:10.600 --> 0:25:13.320
<v Speaker 14>in order of you, the risk of opposed in shipments

0:25:13.520 --> 0:25:15.720
<v Speaker 14>as customers wait for the next generation of chips to

0:25:15.720 --> 0:25:17.840
<v Speaker 14>be available in volumes.

0:25:17.880 --> 0:25:20.760
<v Speaker 4>Not enough, we need more reaction, I coo Yoshioka joins

0:25:20.800 --> 0:25:23.840
<v Speaker 4>us now senior portfolio manager at Wealth Enhancement Group the

0:25:23.880 --> 0:25:26.640
<v Speaker 4>market seemingly thinking it's a disappointment.

0:25:27.080 --> 0:25:27.720
<v Speaker 6>Did you think it was.

0:25:27.680 --> 0:25:32.320
<v Speaker 15>A disappointment, Hi, Kroly, You know I was not disappointed

0:25:32.359 --> 0:25:33.800
<v Speaker 15>with the actual numbers here.

0:25:34.119 --> 0:25:37.000
<v Speaker 16>I think, you know, expectations were.

0:25:36.760 --> 0:25:41.119
<v Speaker 15>Very high going into this particular print, and you know,

0:25:41.240 --> 0:25:45.400
<v Speaker 15>especially when you're here, things like events in New York

0:25:45.480 --> 0:25:48.440
<v Speaker 15>in which you know, bars were being rented out to

0:25:48.480 --> 0:25:51.080
<v Speaker 15>see what the earnings report was going to be.

0:25:51.440 --> 0:25:54.320
<v Speaker 16>You know, it gets to do and more. I was

0:25:54.400 --> 0:25:57.080
<v Speaker 16>not in one. I was at my desk looking at

0:25:57.080 --> 0:25:57.640
<v Speaker 16>the numbers.

0:25:58.160 --> 0:26:02.320
<v Speaker 4>Joe Wisenthal, I saw open reporter was indeed out.

0:26:02.119 --> 0:26:03.040
<v Speaker 6>There in the bars.

0:26:03.080 --> 0:26:07.520
<v Speaker 4>But I'm interested, I co and even though you did

0:26:07.640 --> 0:26:11.640
<v Speaker 4>see this overall disappointment in very high expectations, was there

0:26:11.680 --> 0:26:14.000
<v Speaker 4>any cause for concern? Do you still think is ed

0:26:14.040 --> 0:26:16.840
<v Speaker 4>put to our previous guest, Anthony, that the AI trade

0:26:16.920 --> 0:26:17.440
<v Speaker 4>is intact.

0:26:19.400 --> 0:26:22.040
<v Speaker 15>The AI trade is intact. I think we have to

0:26:22.080 --> 0:26:24.679
<v Speaker 15>put this in the longer term context. You know, in

0:26:24.800 --> 0:26:28.439
<v Speaker 15>Video was generating revenues of about twenty seven billion about

0:26:28.440 --> 0:26:32.119
<v Speaker 15>two years ago. They're on pace to generate revenues of

0:26:32.200 --> 0:26:35.280
<v Speaker 15>over one hundred and twenty five billion this year. That's

0:26:35.400 --> 0:26:39.000
<v Speaker 15>just enormous. Is that growth rates sustainable?

0:26:39.320 --> 0:26:41.840
<v Speaker 16>You know, it clearly is not.

0:26:42.760 --> 0:26:46.280
<v Speaker 15>But they're continuing to grow and the expectations are for

0:26:46.400 --> 0:26:49.400
<v Speaker 15>growth of over forty percent in revenues for next year.

0:26:50.040 --> 0:26:52.639
<v Speaker 15>And Blackwell is just going to be another step up

0:26:52.760 --> 0:26:54.320
<v Speaker 15>in allowing that to happen.

0:26:56.160 --> 0:26:59.119
<v Speaker 5>Oko Wealth Enhancement Group has like what seven point eight

0:26:59.160 --> 0:27:01.960
<v Speaker 5>million in video shares, like a billion dollars worth of stock.

0:27:02.000 --> 0:27:04.920
<v Speaker 5>I know that you were part of our kind of

0:27:04.960 --> 0:27:07.200
<v Speaker 5>watch party last night watching the interview.

0:27:07.680 --> 0:27:10.040
<v Speaker 8>You lead research, right, you use.

0:27:09.920 --> 0:27:12.239
<v Speaker 5>Your expertise to try and work out what's going on.

0:27:13.040 --> 0:27:15.760
<v Speaker 5>What did you work out during the course of that conversation?

0:27:17.680 --> 0:27:19.760
<v Speaker 16>You know, I think this is a long game.

0:27:19.800 --> 0:27:23.679
<v Speaker 15>I think we're still in the early innings of AI deployment,

0:27:24.440 --> 0:27:28.960
<v Speaker 15>the hyperscalers, meta, there's so much use from all of

0:27:28.960 --> 0:27:33.600
<v Speaker 15>these It is table stakes for these large cloud providers,

0:27:34.160 --> 0:27:38.399
<v Speaker 15>and they're seeing productivity gains from the use of AI.

0:27:38.720 --> 0:27:41.200
<v Speaker 16>So I think that's going to continue. It's going to proliferate.

0:27:41.480 --> 0:27:44.119
<v Speaker 15>It is going to take time, but you know, the

0:27:44.200 --> 0:27:48.160
<v Speaker 15>Internet took time as well, and twenty years later, it's

0:27:48.200 --> 0:27:49.000
<v Speaker 15>still evolving.

0:27:50.440 --> 0:27:53.560
<v Speaker 5>Were you convinced by what Jensen Wong just said we

0:27:53.680 --> 0:27:56.560
<v Speaker 5>played in that clip just then that their business has

0:27:56.640 --> 0:28:00.320
<v Speaker 5>broadened out beyond the hyperscalers.

0:28:00.840 --> 0:28:04.240
<v Speaker 15>Yes, I mean they mentioned about, you know, sovereign entities

0:28:05.119 --> 0:28:09.080
<v Speaker 15>purchasing and being in that low double digit billions of

0:28:09.160 --> 0:28:10.520
<v Speaker 15>dollars in terms of revenues.

0:28:10.760 --> 0:28:12.680
<v Speaker 16>You know, that was exciting to see.

0:28:13.200 --> 0:28:15.800
<v Speaker 15>And you know, hyper scalers were forty five percent, which

0:28:15.840 --> 0:28:18.639
<v Speaker 15>means fifty five percent is other revenues.

0:28:18.760 --> 0:28:22.240
<v Speaker 16>So that is a nice diversification as well.

0:28:22.800 --> 0:28:26.080
<v Speaker 15>But that consistency from the hyper spit scalers is likely

0:28:26.119 --> 0:28:26.879
<v Speaker 15>to continue.

0:28:27.119 --> 0:28:29.000
<v Speaker 16>It's just going to be choppy year to year.

0:28:29.480 --> 0:28:33.840
<v Speaker 15>You know, many of these companies, Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, Google,

0:28:33.880 --> 0:28:37.280
<v Speaker 15>they're all going to be evaluating their cap X budgets

0:28:37.359 --> 0:28:40.320
<v Speaker 15>for next year and each year it's not going to

0:28:40.360 --> 0:28:43.280
<v Speaker 15>be the same and so we have to be diligent

0:28:43.360 --> 0:28:45.920
<v Speaker 15>about that. But for the most part, they will be

0:28:46.040 --> 0:28:50.400
<v Speaker 15>spending in order to get that productivity enhancement going forward.

0:28:50.960 --> 0:28:52.560
<v Speaker 6>What about competition?

0:28:53.040 --> 0:28:54.840
<v Speaker 4>A lot of people feeling that if there is just

0:28:54.880 --> 0:28:58.520
<v Speaker 4>a slight blip in this annual cadence of innovation, maybe

0:28:58.560 --> 0:29:01.000
<v Speaker 4>AMD can start to work its way in a little

0:29:01.040 --> 0:29:01.440
<v Speaker 4>bit more.

0:29:01.680 --> 0:29:03.080
<v Speaker 6>Do you agree?

0:29:04.000 --> 0:29:04.280
<v Speaker 16>Sure?

0:29:04.360 --> 0:29:07.280
<v Speaker 15>You know, I think from a high per scaler perspective

0:29:07.400 --> 0:29:10.400
<v Speaker 15>or from the cloud providers, the Internet service providers, you

0:29:10.440 --> 0:29:13.680
<v Speaker 15>always want to have more than just one provider of

0:29:13.720 --> 0:29:17.080
<v Speaker 15>your chips, so you know, there is room for competition,

0:29:17.240 --> 0:29:20.280
<v Speaker 15>I think, you know, that's always something that we have

0:29:20.320 --> 0:29:23.480
<v Speaker 15>to keep in mind. You know, let's not forget that

0:29:23.640 --> 0:29:28.720
<v Speaker 15>Intel had the majority of data center server share for many,

0:29:28.760 --> 0:29:33.000
<v Speaker 15>many years, and here we are with Nvidia really coming

0:29:33.000 --> 0:29:36.280
<v Speaker 15>out and taking share AMD as well. So competition is

0:29:36.360 --> 0:29:39.080
<v Speaker 15>always something that we look for and watch out for.

0:29:39.400 --> 0:29:40.240
<v Speaker 6>Cautionary tail.

0:29:40.560 --> 0:29:43.960
<v Speaker 4>What's interesting is you have holds on Texas instruments on

0:29:44.080 --> 0:29:47.920
<v Speaker 4>Broadcom what many of thought perhaps hasn't moved.

0:29:47.640 --> 0:29:49.840
<v Speaker 6>At the pace that we're expecting.

0:29:49.440 --> 0:29:52.080
<v Speaker 4>Was that these hyperscalers would make their own chips to

0:29:52.120 --> 0:29:54.560
<v Speaker 4>compete in quite the same way, using a Texas instruments,

0:29:54.680 --> 0:29:59.720
<v Speaker 4>using CSMC for example. I'm interested in if ever you

0:29:59.760 --> 0:30:01.600
<v Speaker 4>see that really coming in as a competition.

0:30:03.360 --> 0:30:05.160
<v Speaker 16>You know, it's tough.

0:30:05.240 --> 0:30:08.880
<v Speaker 15>You know, the design part of those chips is you

0:30:08.920 --> 0:30:12.920
<v Speaker 15>know where Nvidia has the advantage along with the software

0:30:12.760 --> 0:30:15.120
<v Speaker 15>associated with AI.

0:30:15.440 --> 0:30:16.960
<v Speaker 16>So you know they're Kuda.

0:30:17.720 --> 0:30:20.040
<v Speaker 15>You know, all the chips are built off of Kuda,

0:30:20.080 --> 0:30:23.840
<v Speaker 15>and that really provides them with the benefit that many

0:30:24.240 --> 0:30:26.960
<v Speaker 15>other chip providers and chip manufacturers just don't have.

0:30:29.520 --> 0:30:33.640
<v Speaker 5>Can you define what Nvidia is, what it actually is.

0:30:35.920 --> 0:30:39.760
<v Speaker 15>You know, Nvidia is a chip maker at the end

0:30:39.760 --> 0:30:42.840
<v Speaker 15>of the day, right, but it is a chip maker

0:30:43.200 --> 0:30:48.000
<v Speaker 15>and is a primary beneficiary for artificial intelligence and how

0:30:48.200 --> 0:30:51.560
<v Speaker 15>computing will go forward in the coming decade.

0:30:53.440 --> 0:30:54.040
<v Speaker 8>Good attempt.

0:30:54.280 --> 0:30:56.560
<v Speaker 5>I think Jensen one might disagree with you and say

0:30:56.600 --> 0:30:57.320
<v Speaker 5>it's more than that.

0:30:57.880 --> 0:30:59.720
<v Speaker 8>We'll get another stab at it incoming.

0:30:59.760 --> 0:31:03.960
<v Speaker 5>Call is Ayoka yoshiok, senior port Lafolio manager, a wealth

0:31:04.000 --> 0:31:04.680
<v Speaker 5>enhancement group.

0:31:04.720 --> 0:31:05.080
<v Speaker 8>Thank you.

0:31:05.320 --> 0:31:08.080
<v Speaker 5>Another story we've been watching is May twan stock jumping

0:31:08.080 --> 0:31:11.440
<v Speaker 5>the most in about six months after China's meal delivery

0:31:11.520 --> 0:31:15.360
<v Speaker 5>leader posted strong earnings ununveiled a one billion dollar buyback.

0:31:15.360 --> 0:31:18.520
<v Speaker 5>It's a positive signal for investors who are increasingly worried

0:31:18.520 --> 0:31:22.160
<v Speaker 5>about domestic consumer malaise in China. It signals may Twan

0:31:22.560 --> 0:31:26.160
<v Speaker 5>is beating rivals like byte Dance, which joined Ali Barber

0:31:26.480 --> 0:31:28.040
<v Speaker 5>in its main market character.

0:31:28.360 --> 0:31:31.160
<v Speaker 4>Coming up, we've got more of a conversation on AI

0:31:32.000 --> 0:31:35.240
<v Speaker 4>about the regulation. Russell Wold, deputy director of Stanford's Institute

0:31:35.240 --> 0:31:38.560
<v Speaker 4>for Humans Centered AI, joins US. Let's get a quick

0:31:38.600 --> 0:31:41.480
<v Speaker 4>check on AI. Another area meta at one point six percent.

0:31:41.720 --> 0:31:45.640
<v Speaker 4>They have an announcement. LAMA foundational model was downloaded over

0:31:45.680 --> 0:31:48.560
<v Speaker 4>twenty million times in the past month, approaching three hundred

0:31:48.560 --> 0:31:51.680
<v Speaker 4>and fifty million total downloads. Basically, it shows traction, so

0:31:51.800 --> 0:31:55.920
<v Speaker 4>as Bloomberg Intelligence says, maybe some new licensing.

0:31:55.480 --> 0:32:08.240
<v Speaker 6>Revenue stream in the horizon. This is Blomberg Technology.

0:32:10.280 --> 0:32:14.360
<v Speaker 5>Sources telling Bloomberg Open Ai is getting closer to raising

0:32:14.480 --> 0:32:18.400
<v Speaker 5>funding at evaluation of more than one hundred billion dollars

0:32:18.440 --> 0:32:21.880
<v Speaker 5>in a round led by Frive Capital, Bloomberg Sharene Gafari

0:32:22.600 --> 0:32:25.200
<v Speaker 5>joins us now for more and kind of you about this.

0:32:25.280 --> 0:32:27.719
<v Speaker 5>Back in December, you and I reported about the idea

0:32:27.760 --> 0:32:31.680
<v Speaker 5>of like a primary more secondaries by some pretty big number.

0:32:31.840 --> 0:32:35.080
<v Speaker 8>More details please, that's right.

0:32:35.200 --> 0:32:38.280
<v Speaker 17>So open ai is advancing talks to raise a new

0:32:38.360 --> 0:32:41.320
<v Speaker 17>round of financing that would value it at one hundred

0:32:41.400 --> 0:32:43.760
<v Speaker 17>billion dollars, and that round of financing would be for

0:32:43.840 --> 0:32:46.360
<v Speaker 17>one billion led by Thrive Capital.

0:32:47.240 --> 0:32:49.920
<v Speaker 6>Do we know why they're raising funding?

0:32:52.760 --> 0:32:55.600
<v Speaker 17>Developing AI is incredibly expensive?

0:32:55.800 --> 0:32:56.000
<v Speaker 5>Right?

0:32:56.040 --> 0:33:02.160
<v Speaker 17>So, according to an employee memo written by obeniic Foe yesterday,

0:33:02.280 --> 0:33:04.200
<v Speaker 17>you know the company is doing this because they need

0:33:04.240 --> 0:33:07.920
<v Speaker 17>to cover their operating and computing costs, right, the incredible

0:33:07.920 --> 0:33:11.360
<v Speaker 17>costs of GPUs that they need to keep scaling up

0:33:11.400 --> 0:33:14.600
<v Speaker 17>their large language models to reach their goal of achieving

0:33:14.640 --> 0:33:18.200
<v Speaker 17>some kind of artificial general intelligence. That is a project

0:33:18.240 --> 0:33:21.560
<v Speaker 17>that just demands sort of an endless pile of cash.

0:33:21.760 --> 0:33:25.360
<v Speaker 4>With all of Microsoft backing Sharhan KAfari, they still need more.

0:33:25.360 --> 0:33:25.800
<v Speaker 6>We thank you.

0:33:25.920 --> 0:33:29.840
<v Speaker 4>Meanwhile, California's state Assembly approved a controversial AI safety bill

0:33:29.840 --> 0:33:33.080
<v Speaker 4>that requires companies to make sure their technology doesn't cause

0:33:33.240 --> 0:33:36.400
<v Speaker 4>major harm. Now, the bill SB ten forty seven would

0:33:36.480 --> 0:33:39.880
<v Speaker 4>require companies to take precautions such as implementing a kill

0:33:39.920 --> 0:33:42.760
<v Speaker 4>switch that can turn off their technology at any time.

0:33:43.240 --> 0:33:46.800
<v Speaker 4>Russell Wold as deputy director of the Stanford HI and

0:33:46.880 --> 0:33:49.920
<v Speaker 4>you're discussing the bill and larger AI landscape with us

0:33:50.000 --> 0:33:53.880
<v Speaker 4>because Russell many would say, well, that's a good thing,

0:33:54.400 --> 0:33:57.479
<v Speaker 4>being able to control technology that perhaps some are fearful of.

0:33:57.680 --> 0:34:00.800
<v Speaker 4>Why is this a threat to your academic Wesse such.

0:34:01.880 --> 0:34:04.760
<v Speaker 18>Well, good morning, Caroline, and thank you for having me.

0:34:05.840 --> 0:34:09.440
<v Speaker 18>I think what's really important about good policy is it

0:34:09.480 --> 0:34:11.919
<v Speaker 18>should solve for the harm that it's trying to solve

0:34:12.000 --> 0:34:14.520
<v Speaker 18>for in the case of SB ten forty seven, and

0:34:14.600 --> 0:34:19.320
<v Speaker 18>unfortunately does not do that. However, what is most concerning

0:34:19.360 --> 0:34:21.640
<v Speaker 18>from my perspective is that harms academia.

0:34:22.160 --> 0:34:24.520
<v Speaker 10>Harms academia because it hurts.

0:34:24.360 --> 0:34:27.680
<v Speaker 18>The open source community and makes it very difficult for

0:34:27.719 --> 0:34:32.160
<v Speaker 18>the open source community, startups or other industry or large

0:34:32.160 --> 0:34:35.640
<v Speaker 18>players like Meta who puts out the Lama model for

0:34:35.800 --> 0:34:38.880
<v Speaker 18>us to be able to dissect understand how that works,

0:34:39.320 --> 0:34:42.560
<v Speaker 18>what its impact will be for society. And we need

0:34:42.600 --> 0:34:44.680
<v Speaker 18>to be able to train the next generation to be

0:34:44.840 --> 0:34:47.239
<v Speaker 18>AI leaders. And if we can't be able to have

0:34:47.360 --> 0:34:50.759
<v Speaker 18>access to this because this could hurt this entire community,

0:34:51.120 --> 0:34:54.240
<v Speaker 18>then I think SB ten forty seven is actually counterproductive.

0:34:55.160 --> 0:35:00.359
<v Speaker 4>Now, what those who have written SB ten and would

0:35:00.400 --> 0:35:02.520
<v Speaker 4>come back with and indeed we did have Scott Wiener

0:35:02.600 --> 0:35:05.880
<v Speaker 4>on the show previously is saying, look, we're not taxing,

0:35:05.920 --> 0:35:09.040
<v Speaker 4>we're not asking those that are running smaller models. We're

0:35:09.040 --> 0:35:12.479
<v Speaker 4>spending less than ten million or so. We are only

0:35:12.520 --> 0:35:16.000
<v Speaker 4>after the big players. Why is it such a crucial impact?

0:35:16.040 --> 0:35:18.120
<v Speaker 4>For example, when Lama seems to be going great, we

0:35:18.200 --> 0:35:20.360
<v Speaker 4>just had numbers out of Meta that there's twenty million

0:35:20.400 --> 0:35:22.120
<v Speaker 4>times downloads in the past month.

0:35:21.920 --> 0:35:25.760
<v Speaker 10>Alone, right, And that's precisely the point.

0:35:26.440 --> 0:35:29.560
<v Speaker 18>Meta alone right now is looking at maybe restricting Lama's

0:35:29.640 --> 0:35:34.920
<v Speaker 18>use in the EU because of the overly stringent areas.

0:35:35.120 --> 0:35:36.960
<v Speaker 10>SB ten forty seven is by.

0:35:36.880 --> 0:35:40.040
<v Speaker 18>Far more far reaching than this when it comes to

0:35:40.080 --> 0:35:43.239
<v Speaker 18>the liability issues related to that, and the problem with

0:35:43.280 --> 0:35:46.239
<v Speaker 18>that is is companies like Meta won't be releasing this

0:35:46.360 --> 0:35:49.240
<v Speaker 18>if there are such strong liability that can come against

0:35:49.320 --> 0:35:51.960
<v Speaker 18>them for this, and without that, we won't be able

0:35:52.040 --> 0:35:55.080
<v Speaker 18>to understand and interrogate these models and see how they

0:35:55.160 --> 0:35:58.400
<v Speaker 18>work the way academia does and how we do that

0:35:58.520 --> 0:36:01.359
<v Speaker 18>very well, so that will off an entire choke point

0:36:01.400 --> 0:36:05.560
<v Speaker 18>to us. For second, I would also add that academia

0:36:05.560 --> 0:36:09.160
<v Speaker 18>itself well resourced universities do want to look into how

0:36:09.200 --> 0:36:12.440
<v Speaker 18>to build these, and so there's consortiums of universities that

0:36:12.560 --> 0:36:14.920
<v Speaker 18>might want to spend more money in building these so

0:36:14.960 --> 0:36:17.600
<v Speaker 18>we can train the next generation on how this works.

0:36:17.800 --> 0:36:19.800
<v Speaker 10>And we won't be able to do that because we won't.

0:36:19.560 --> 0:36:21.719
<v Speaker 18>Be able to afford all of the lawyers and the

0:36:21.840 --> 0:36:24.560
<v Speaker 18>legal fees that will be required to be able to

0:36:24.560 --> 0:36:25.520
<v Speaker 18>stay in compliance.

0:36:27.480 --> 0:36:30.280
<v Speaker 5>Something that you just said, Russell about sort of academic

0:36:30.360 --> 0:36:33.800
<v Speaker 5>access to technology. You know, we had Nvidia's earnings last

0:36:33.880 --> 0:36:36.680
<v Speaker 5>night and a discussion with Jensen Wong I had was

0:36:36.719 --> 0:36:39.600
<v Speaker 5>about the broadening out of the use of AI accelerators

0:36:39.600 --> 0:36:44.800
<v Speaker 5>beyond the hyperscalas can Stamford Institute for Human Centered AI

0:36:45.040 --> 0:36:49.640
<v Speaker 5>get access to a cluster like is this a situation

0:36:49.719 --> 0:36:50.480
<v Speaker 5>that works for you?

0:36:52.840 --> 0:36:54.960
<v Speaker 10>It's actually a significant challenge for us.

0:36:55.000 --> 0:36:58.719
<v Speaker 18>We actually just were able to secure thirty h one hundreds,

0:36:58.719 --> 0:37:02.920
<v Speaker 18>and that sounds one, but it's unfortunate because the reality

0:37:03.080 --> 0:37:06.439
<v Speaker 18>is is if you look at what Meta has tried

0:37:06.480 --> 0:37:08.760
<v Speaker 18>to secure, they're trying to secure three hundred thousand.

0:37:09.200 --> 0:37:10.520
<v Speaker 10>So the reality is.

0:37:10.360 --> 0:37:13.799
<v Speaker 18>Is academia is constrained as to what it can do

0:37:14.040 --> 0:37:17.839
<v Speaker 18>in this particular space, and we are very limited, and

0:37:17.880 --> 0:37:19.440
<v Speaker 18>what we need to do is have.

0:37:19.800 --> 0:37:22.080
<v Speaker 10>Congress past the Create AI Act.

0:37:22.320 --> 0:37:26.960
<v Speaker 18>That is a government a subsidizing compute and data for

0:37:27.040 --> 0:37:29.720
<v Speaker 18>academic research, and it's desperately needed.

0:37:29.920 --> 0:37:31.440
<v Speaker 10>And academia also needs to.

0:37:31.400 --> 0:37:34.480
<v Speaker 18>Consider how to reform here and put greater degree of

0:37:34.520 --> 0:37:36.960
<v Speaker 18>investment in this so that we can be able to

0:37:36.960 --> 0:37:40.280
<v Speaker 18>train students so that they can be the next DAI leaders.

0:37:41.600 --> 0:37:43.719
<v Speaker 5>SB ten forty seven. Sorry to go back to it.

0:37:43.760 --> 0:37:45.200
<v Speaker 5>Is this the end of the story or do you

0:37:45.200 --> 0:37:48.640
<v Speaker 5>think you'll continue to be consulted as this moves forward.

0:37:50.480 --> 0:37:53.160
<v Speaker 10>We are being continually consulted on this.

0:37:53.239 --> 0:37:55.879
<v Speaker 18>But the reality is is there's a chorus of people

0:37:55.920 --> 0:37:59.520
<v Speaker 18>who are deeply concerned about this. It's not just academia.

0:37:59.560 --> 0:38:03.840
<v Speaker 18>It is deed, small businesses that are startups that are

0:38:03.920 --> 0:38:05.640
<v Speaker 18>afraid of what this will mean for them.

0:38:05.880 --> 0:38:07.480
<v Speaker 10>And there's this ironic side of this.

0:38:07.800 --> 0:38:11.520
<v Speaker 18>It bizarrely will entranch er make the most powerful companies

0:38:12.160 --> 0:38:15.440
<v Speaker 18>even more secure in this space because they can afford

0:38:15.440 --> 0:38:18.480
<v Speaker 18>the legal fees, they can afford all the compliance fees

0:38:18.520 --> 0:38:23.480
<v Speaker 18>and things that come from this. Startups in academia cannot.

0:38:25.120 --> 0:38:29.240
<v Speaker 5>Russell Wald of Stanford Institute for Human Centered Artificial Intelligence, thank.

0:38:29.200 --> 0:38:39.759
<v Speaker 4>You just check in on shares of Salesforce arising after

0:38:39.800 --> 0:38:42.280
<v Speaker 4>the company delivered in earnings forecus look that top estimates

0:38:42.280 --> 0:38:44.280
<v Speaker 4>and announced some changes at the c suite.

0:38:44.320 --> 0:38:46.720
<v Speaker 6>Amy Weaver stepping down a CFO.

0:38:46.680 --> 0:38:49.880
<v Speaker 4>After four years in the job, numerks Brady Ford across it.

0:38:50.120 --> 0:38:52.440
<v Speaker 4>What else do we hear other than executive shake up?

0:38:52.960 --> 0:38:57.040
<v Speaker 19>What we really learned is that software companies and cumbents

0:38:57.080 --> 0:38:59.440
<v Speaker 19>are not sure where they fit in the AI moment.

0:39:00.040 --> 0:39:03.560
<v Speaker 19>Last night, Salesforce rebranded it's AI tools not as assistants,

0:39:03.600 --> 0:39:05.839
<v Speaker 19>but as agents. And we heard this word over one

0:39:05.880 --> 0:39:08.280
<v Speaker 19>hundred times. They kept saying, we are making agents.

0:39:08.320 --> 0:39:09.480
<v Speaker 3>Now, how is.

0:39:09.480 --> 0:39:12.280
<v Speaker 19>That different from the assistance we've seen with Microsoft and others.

0:39:12.960 --> 0:39:16.280
<v Speaker 19>No one's sure yet, but we are learning that software

0:39:16.320 --> 0:39:18.160
<v Speaker 19>companies continue to trying to find their place in this

0:39:18.239 --> 0:39:20.839
<v Speaker 19>AI moment and the revenue is not here yet.

0:39:20.880 --> 0:39:22.479
<v Speaker 8>But hey, just wait a year or two.

0:39:23.640 --> 0:39:26.440
<v Speaker 5>I saw Amy Weavers post on LinkedIn She's been CFO

0:39:26.520 --> 0:39:30.160
<v Speaker 5>for four years but Salesforce for eleven. How's the market

0:39:30.280 --> 0:39:31.520
<v Speaker 5>taking that departure?

0:39:32.280 --> 0:39:32.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah?

0:39:32.560 --> 0:39:35.880
<v Speaker 19>The market, I think is reading this as wait a second,

0:39:35.960 --> 0:39:40.400
<v Speaker 19>is that everlasting Salesforce succession stories starting to kind of

0:39:40.440 --> 0:39:43.480
<v Speaker 19>get rolling again right, four years is a relatively short

0:39:43.480 --> 0:39:44.520
<v Speaker 19>CFO tenure.

0:39:45.600 --> 0:39:46.640
<v Speaker 10>She was well liked.

0:39:46.719 --> 0:39:49.160
<v Speaker 19>She's not leaving for another opportunity, it doesn't seem so

0:39:49.200 --> 0:39:52.000
<v Speaker 19>it's hey, is this another phase of Salesforce's growth. They're

0:39:52.040 --> 0:39:55.439
<v Speaker 19>doing more consumption based pricing, the business model's changing a bit,

0:39:55.840 --> 0:39:57.400
<v Speaker 19>and maybe they just feel they need to bring some

0:39:57.480 --> 0:39:58.319
<v Speaker 19>fresh blood in.

0:39:58.320 --> 0:39:59.000
<v Speaker 10>At the top.

0:39:59.320 --> 0:40:02.000
<v Speaker 19>Because again, that idea of who will one day replace

0:40:02.080 --> 0:40:04.680
<v Speaker 19>Bernieoff is a kind of everlasting question.

0:40:05.640 --> 0:40:07.960
<v Speaker 4>I mean who has been there a significant amount of

0:40:07.960 --> 0:40:10.480
<v Speaker 4>time that people feel can step into that void.

0:40:10.920 --> 0:40:14.040
<v Speaker 19>Third Chief operating Officer Brian Millum. He has been there

0:40:14.040 --> 0:40:16.640
<v Speaker 19>for very long and has taken on a much wider

0:40:16.719 --> 0:40:20.960
<v Speaker 19>expanded role. I would say if tomorrow bernnioff a I'm

0:40:21.000 --> 0:40:23.080
<v Speaker 19>done with this, would probably be him. But at the

0:40:23.160 --> 0:40:25.319
<v Speaker 19>end of the day, investors would probably like to see

0:40:25.320 --> 0:40:28.839
<v Speaker 19>a bit more new talent coming in, maybe from the outside.

0:40:29.080 --> 0:40:30.120
<v Speaker 19>That's something that I hear.

0:40:30.040 --> 0:40:32.839
<v Speaker 4>Of them, and an AI boost that can't come quick

0:40:32.920 --> 0:40:36.000
<v Speaker 4>enough to five momentum, so says Barkley's pretty ford all

0:40:36.040 --> 0:40:36.600
<v Speaker 4>over these.

0:40:36.440 --> 0:40:38.560
<v Speaker 6>Earnings, we thank him for it. Now?

0:40:38.600 --> 0:40:40.920
<v Speaker 4>That does it for this edition of Bloomberg Technology A

0:40:40.920 --> 0:40:41.480
<v Speaker 4>big one.

0:40:42.080 --> 0:40:44.719
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, it was a big one. Recap it on the podcast.

0:40:44.760 --> 0:40:48.000
<v Speaker 5>You know where to find the Bloomberg Technology Podcast on Apple, Spotify,

0:40:48.040 --> 0:40:51.759
<v Speaker 5>iHeart and all the Bloomberg platforms. Big thanks from everyone

0:40:51.800 --> 0:40:55.319
<v Speaker 5>here in San Francisco, Caitly and Jackie and Carr in

0:40:55.320 --> 0:40:57.440
<v Speaker 5>New York City. There's one day to go in this

0:40:57.520 --> 0:41:00.399
<v Speaker 5>busy tech week. This is Bloomberg Technology.

0:41:00.440 --> 0:41:01.560
<v Speaker 8>It don't