WEBVTT - AI and Price Fixing

0:00:04.480 --> 0:00:12.440
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Tech Stuff, a production from iHeartRadio. Hey thereon

0:00:12.600 --> 0:00:16.080
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Tech Stuff. I'm your host, job than Strickland.

0:00:16.079 --> 0:00:19.279
<v Speaker 1>I'm an executive producer with iHeart Podcasts. And how the

0:00:19.320 --> 0:00:24.079
<v Speaker 1>tech are you? So imagine that you're a kid, and

0:00:24.560 --> 0:00:27.560
<v Speaker 1>it's a bright summer morning, and you got the whole

0:00:27.720 --> 0:00:30.320
<v Speaker 1>day ahead of you. So you decide you want to

0:00:30.360 --> 0:00:33.040
<v Speaker 1>earn a little scratch. You're going to engage in the old,

0:00:33.440 --> 0:00:36.960
<v Speaker 1>tried and true hustle of elimonade stand. So you got

0:00:37.000 --> 0:00:39.600
<v Speaker 1>your lemons, you got your sugar, you got your water,

0:00:40.000 --> 0:00:42.400
<v Speaker 1>you got your ice, you got your paper cups, your

0:00:42.479 --> 0:00:45.880
<v Speaker 1>sunk around. I don't know ten bucks in your ingredients

0:00:45.960 --> 0:00:49.480
<v Speaker 1>and supplies all told, and your goal is to make

0:00:49.600 --> 0:00:53.600
<v Speaker 1>more money than you spent putting it all together. Well,

0:00:53.680 --> 0:00:56.680
<v Speaker 1>you got some decisions you need to make. Where are

0:00:56.720 --> 0:00:59.080
<v Speaker 1>you going to locate your lemonade stand? How are you

0:00:59.120 --> 0:01:02.080
<v Speaker 1>going to get the attention of people going by? And

0:01:02.200 --> 0:01:06.360
<v Speaker 1>perhaps most importantly, how much are you going to charge? Now?

0:01:06.400 --> 0:01:08.800
<v Speaker 1>If you charge too much, no one's going to buy

0:01:08.840 --> 0:01:11.319
<v Speaker 1>a cup of your lemonade. If you charge too little,

0:01:11.520 --> 0:01:14.520
<v Speaker 1>you'll end up making less than what you spent on materials.

0:01:14.560 --> 0:01:17.520
<v Speaker 1>Even if you sell out. So finding the balance between

0:01:17.560 --> 0:01:19.880
<v Speaker 1>what the market will bear and what you need in

0:01:19.959 --> 0:01:23.000
<v Speaker 1>order to cover your costs is one of those fundamental

0:01:23.080 --> 0:01:27.959
<v Speaker 1>journeys every business takes, whether it's products or services. Now,

0:01:28.280 --> 0:01:32.920
<v Speaker 1>an agile business operator might adjust things on the fly.

0:01:33.480 --> 0:01:38.600
<v Speaker 1>Maybe there are some external factors that are playing an effect. Right,

0:01:38.680 --> 0:01:41.839
<v Speaker 1>Maybe the day is extra hot, you know, maybe there's

0:01:41.840 --> 0:01:45.199
<v Speaker 1>a block party or a festival nearby, so there's more

0:01:45.240 --> 0:01:47.240
<v Speaker 1>foot traffic than normal. That would be a good place

0:01:47.280 --> 0:01:49.680
<v Speaker 1>to put your lemonade stand. These are the things that

0:01:49.720 --> 0:01:53.120
<v Speaker 1>are going to affect demand, and they could mean that

0:01:53.200 --> 0:01:56.000
<v Speaker 1>you could price your eliminade a little higher than you

0:01:56.040 --> 0:02:00.400
<v Speaker 1>would if it were on a quiet and overcast day. Heck,

0:02:00.640 --> 0:02:04.200
<v Speaker 1>maybe you realize early on that you price things too high,

0:02:04.440 --> 0:02:06.760
<v Speaker 1>so you quietly lower the cost of a couple of

0:02:06.840 --> 0:02:09.600
<v Speaker 1>lemonade and sales pick up. As a result, you have

0:02:09.720 --> 0:02:13.280
<v Speaker 1>engaged in what is called dynamic pricing. Now, from a

0:02:13.360 --> 0:02:16.560
<v Speaker 1>high level, this sort of pricing happens all the time,

0:02:16.760 --> 0:02:19.600
<v Speaker 1>though it's not always shifting moment to moment where we

0:02:19.639 --> 0:02:22.880
<v Speaker 1>can see it in action. So you might find that

0:02:22.960 --> 0:02:26.160
<v Speaker 1>a product in the store costs a little more or

0:02:26.160 --> 0:02:29.080
<v Speaker 1>a little less since the last time you went shopping

0:02:29.120 --> 0:02:32.160
<v Speaker 1>at that store. But in your typical store, you're not

0:02:32.320 --> 0:02:35.120
<v Speaker 1>likely to see the price tag change right before your eyes.

0:02:35.480 --> 0:02:39.360
<v Speaker 1>But that is changing, and it's largely thanks to AI.

0:02:39.960 --> 0:02:44.600
<v Speaker 1>AI powered dynamic pricing is intended to maximize profits for

0:02:44.720 --> 0:02:47.880
<v Speaker 1>business owners. That's really all there is to it. When

0:02:47.919 --> 0:02:51.080
<v Speaker 1>you get down to the bottom line. It's meant to

0:02:51.240 --> 0:02:54.560
<v Speaker 1>make people more money. And by people I mean business

0:02:54.560 --> 0:02:57.680
<v Speaker 1>owners customers. It's meant to take more of their money.

0:02:57.840 --> 0:03:03.200
<v Speaker 1>So maximization can get pretty crazy. An aipower dynamic pricing

0:03:03.240 --> 0:03:06.640
<v Speaker 1>tool could in theory adjust prices on products not just

0:03:06.720 --> 0:03:10.359
<v Speaker 1>based on local demand, but also as a result of

0:03:10.720 --> 0:03:13.880
<v Speaker 1>how the perception of the product changes. Here, I'm going

0:03:13.919 --> 0:03:18.280
<v Speaker 1>to give you a totally hypothetical example. Susie the TikTok

0:03:18.360 --> 0:03:22.880
<v Speaker 1>star is brainstorming ideas for content and she decides to

0:03:22.919 --> 0:03:26.800
<v Speaker 1>create a comedic sassy sketch and it centers around a

0:03:26.800 --> 0:03:30.160
<v Speaker 1>particular brand of butter. So she shoots her video, she

0:03:30.360 --> 0:03:34.000
<v Speaker 1>edits it, she uploads it, and the engagement comes pouring in.

0:03:34.320 --> 0:03:38.360
<v Speaker 1>Now among the countless teeny bopper fans watching her content,

0:03:38.480 --> 0:03:42.200
<v Speaker 1>there are also AI bots. One of those identifies the

0:03:42.240 --> 0:03:44.600
<v Speaker 1>brand of butter in the video and takes note of

0:03:44.640 --> 0:03:47.560
<v Speaker 1>the engagement that the video is getting. It's saying, huh,

0:03:47.760 --> 0:03:50.040
<v Speaker 1>lots of people are watching this video. And it does

0:03:50.080 --> 0:03:53.400
<v Speaker 1>some quick checking on available stats to figure out how

0:03:53.600 --> 0:03:58.040
<v Speaker 1>popular Susie the TikTok Star is in say a specific

0:03:58.160 --> 0:04:01.280
<v Speaker 1>local region. It figures out there's actually a huge fan

0:04:01.360 --> 0:04:04.680
<v Speaker 1>base in this area, and it concludes that at least

0:04:04.720 --> 0:04:06.840
<v Speaker 1>some of those fans are likely to rush out and

0:04:06.920 --> 0:04:10.520
<v Speaker 1>try to recreate Susie the TikTok Stars video and to

0:04:10.560 --> 0:04:13.080
<v Speaker 1>do that, they're going to want the genuine article. They're

0:04:13.120 --> 0:04:16.279
<v Speaker 1>going to want the same brand of butter that Susie used.

0:04:16.560 --> 0:04:20.480
<v Speaker 1>And so this AI, which happens to be a price

0:04:20.640 --> 0:04:25.159
<v Speaker 1>strategy AI for a local grocery store chain, makes the

0:04:25.200 --> 0:04:28.160
<v Speaker 1>call to bump the price on that particular brand of

0:04:28.200 --> 0:04:31.279
<v Speaker 1>butter because there's about to be a surge in demand.

0:04:31.480 --> 0:04:34.640
<v Speaker 1>The AI is not waiting to detect the demand is

0:04:34.680 --> 0:04:38.480
<v Speaker 1>surging and then respond to it. It's actually being proactive.

0:04:38.640 --> 0:04:42.719
<v Speaker 1>It is predicting the increase in demand and acting on

0:04:42.800 --> 0:04:47.000
<v Speaker 1>it now instead of later. Now, we've seen dynamic surge

0:04:47.000 --> 0:04:52.920
<v Speaker 1>pricing for years already, though not necessarily in the grocery market.

0:04:53.600 --> 0:04:57.000
<v Speaker 1>Ride haling companies have been making use of surge pricing

0:04:57.040 --> 0:05:02.080
<v Speaker 1>to respond to demand for years since they launched. You've

0:05:02.200 --> 0:05:06.280
<v Speaker 1>probably been in a situation in which the cost of hailing,

0:05:06.440 --> 0:05:09.119
<v Speaker 1>you know, an uber or lyft or whatever is way

0:05:09.240 --> 0:05:12.320
<v Speaker 1>higher than it normally would be for that part of

0:05:12.360 --> 0:05:15.000
<v Speaker 1>town in that time of day. This often happens when

0:05:15.040 --> 0:05:18.000
<v Speaker 1>there's a big event going on, like a huge music

0:05:18.080 --> 0:05:22.080
<v Speaker 1>concert or sporting event or conference or whatever, and during

0:05:22.120 --> 0:05:25.040
<v Speaker 1>that window of time you may be paying twice as

0:05:25.120 --> 0:05:28.400
<v Speaker 1>much or more for a ride as you would any

0:05:28.440 --> 0:05:31.400
<v Speaker 1>other day. Now, there are a couple of reasons for this.

0:05:31.839 --> 0:05:36.000
<v Speaker 1>One is that demand is exceeding supply. There are more

0:05:36.040 --> 0:05:38.320
<v Speaker 1>people who are looking for a ride than you have

0:05:38.440 --> 0:05:42.080
<v Speaker 1>drivers available to give people a ride, So raising prices

0:05:42.400 --> 0:05:45.520
<v Speaker 1>can discourage folks who don't need a ride as badly

0:05:45.800 --> 0:05:48.560
<v Speaker 1>as the ones who do. So the folks who really

0:05:48.600 --> 0:05:51.360
<v Speaker 1>need a ride, presuming they can still afford to pay

0:05:51.400 --> 0:05:54.240
<v Speaker 1>for it, will stick it out, and yeah, they'll have

0:05:54.279 --> 0:05:56.480
<v Speaker 1>to pay more than usual, but the point is they'll

0:05:56.520 --> 0:05:58.320
<v Speaker 1>get a car and they'll be able to get to

0:05:58.360 --> 0:06:03.680
<v Speaker 1>where they need to go. The folks who say WHOA, Okay, well, y'all,

0:06:03.760 --> 0:06:06.159
<v Speaker 1>maybe we shouldn't go to shake Shack. Maybe we should

0:06:06.160 --> 0:06:09.000
<v Speaker 1>just find a place to eat around here. They'll back

0:06:09.080 --> 0:06:13.120
<v Speaker 1>off and that helps improve availability. It decreases demand and

0:06:13.200 --> 0:06:15.880
<v Speaker 1>allows the supply to get to where it's needed. But

0:06:15.960 --> 0:06:19.920
<v Speaker 1>another reason is that surge pricing alerts drivers to areas

0:06:19.960 --> 0:06:23.000
<v Speaker 1>of high demand. So cities can be pretty darn big.

0:06:23.040 --> 0:06:25.359
<v Speaker 1>If you don't live in a city, you might not

0:06:25.440 --> 0:06:28.159
<v Speaker 1>be used to it. But if there's a large demand

0:06:28.160 --> 0:06:31.600
<v Speaker 1>that arises in one particular part of the city, drivers

0:06:31.640 --> 0:06:34.320
<v Speaker 1>will see it on their apps and they can actually

0:06:34.440 --> 0:06:37.480
<v Speaker 1>choose to reroute toward that part of town in order

0:06:37.520 --> 0:06:40.000
<v Speaker 1>to take advantage of the surge. So that means that

0:06:40.120 --> 0:06:43.800
<v Speaker 1>you get more drivers coming into the area, and that

0:06:43.880 --> 0:06:48.640
<v Speaker 1>means the supply for drivers increases. This in turn affects

0:06:48.640 --> 0:06:52.880
<v Speaker 1>demands and eventually the surge subsides. So this is one

0:06:52.920 --> 0:06:56.600
<v Speaker 1>way to dynamically respond to demand spikes. It's giving an

0:06:56.640 --> 0:06:59.920
<v Speaker 1>incentive to drivers to say, yes, there are probably people

0:07:00.400 --> 0:07:03.240
<v Speaker 1>around my area right now who are looking for a ride,

0:07:03.480 --> 0:07:06.679
<v Speaker 1>but way more people are looking for a ride across town,

0:07:07.240 --> 0:07:10.520
<v Speaker 1>and I will benefit from the fact that surge pricing

0:07:10.680 --> 0:07:12.480
<v Speaker 1>is in effect, So if I can get there in

0:07:12.600 --> 0:07:15.640
<v Speaker 1>time to pick up a ride, I can end up

0:07:15.640 --> 0:07:19.240
<v Speaker 1>getting more money for that ride, so it actually makes

0:07:19.280 --> 0:07:21.360
<v Speaker 1>sense for me to leave the area I'm in right

0:07:21.400 --> 0:07:24.360
<v Speaker 1>now and head across town now. Of course, the other

0:07:24.440 --> 0:07:29.400
<v Speaker 1>reason that surge pricing exists is that it creates opportunities

0:07:29.400 --> 0:07:32.840
<v Speaker 1>for the company to make that cheddar right because the

0:07:32.840 --> 0:07:36.520
<v Speaker 1>companies that are employing oh wait, I'm sorry, I'm sorry,

0:07:36.680 --> 0:07:41.040
<v Speaker 1>the companies that are contracting with the drivers, they certainly

0:07:41.120 --> 0:07:43.920
<v Speaker 1>want their cut of the pie as well. So surge

0:07:43.920 --> 0:07:47.840
<v Speaker 1>pricing means making more money from the same trips as

0:07:47.880 --> 0:07:51.600
<v Speaker 1>you would any other day. Though this doesn't last forever

0:07:51.680 --> 0:07:55.720
<v Speaker 1>because once supply and demand will reach parity, then surge

0:07:55.720 --> 0:07:59.440
<v Speaker 1>pricing will decrease. Otherwise you run the risk of alienating

0:07:59.440 --> 0:08:03.800
<v Speaker 1>your customers. So surge pricing is something that can address

0:08:03.920 --> 0:08:07.480
<v Speaker 1>a sudden increase in demand. And I don't think it's

0:08:07.520 --> 0:08:10.640
<v Speaker 1>a perfect solution, but at the same time like it.

0:08:10.640 --> 0:08:13.760
<v Speaker 1>It is a way to solve that problem. It kind

0:08:13.760 --> 0:08:17.679
<v Speaker 1>of stinks if you're one of the people who really

0:08:17.720 --> 0:08:19.680
<v Speaker 1>needs a ride. That means that you're going to be

0:08:19.720 --> 0:08:23.840
<v Speaker 1>paying extra. If you're able to wait, then eventually that

0:08:24.000 --> 0:08:28.600
<v Speaker 1>serge is going to drive enough drivers there to bring

0:08:28.680 --> 0:08:30.840
<v Speaker 1>the pricing down. But then on the flip side, if

0:08:30.840 --> 0:08:34.559
<v Speaker 1>you're a driver and you get to an area just

0:08:34.600 --> 0:08:37.120
<v Speaker 1>as surge pricing is on the decline, kind of stinks

0:08:37.160 --> 0:08:39.520
<v Speaker 1>for you because you missed out on an opportunity. So like,

0:08:39.600 --> 0:08:42.400
<v Speaker 1>it's not a perfect system by any stretch of the imagination.

0:08:42.480 --> 0:08:44.640
<v Speaker 1>But let me do you one better. What if the

0:08:44.679 --> 0:08:49.600
<v Speaker 1>AI knew how much money the customers were making, and

0:08:49.679 --> 0:08:53.240
<v Speaker 1>therefore the AI could adjust the price on products and

0:08:53.360 --> 0:08:56.080
<v Speaker 1>services in order to kind of give it that little

0:08:56.200 --> 0:08:59.880
<v Speaker 1>personal touch. And by personal touch, I mean adjust ca

0:09:00.640 --> 0:09:03.800
<v Speaker 1>so that they're as much, but not more than the

0:09:03.840 --> 0:09:06.800
<v Speaker 1>customer would be willing to pay, perhaps more than what

0:09:06.960 --> 0:09:10.600
<v Speaker 1>the person ahead of that customer or behind that customer

0:09:10.640 --> 0:09:14.240
<v Speaker 1>is paying, but just the right amount to get the

0:09:14.280 --> 0:09:18.960
<v Speaker 1>maximum money from that customer. Does that seem fair? Imagine

0:09:19.000 --> 0:09:21.360
<v Speaker 1>walking into a grocery store and finding out that the

0:09:21.400 --> 0:09:23.760
<v Speaker 1>carton of oat milk you've picked up it's actually going

0:09:23.840 --> 0:09:26.600
<v Speaker 1>to cost you forty cents more than it costs the

0:09:26.640 --> 0:09:29.360
<v Speaker 1>person who is behind you. That probably wouldn't feel really

0:09:29.400 --> 0:09:32.439
<v Speaker 1>good that. Keep in mind, this dynamic pricing is meant

0:09:32.480 --> 0:09:36.880
<v Speaker 1>to cater to income levels, so being charged less means

0:09:36.880 --> 0:09:40.000
<v Speaker 1>that you would be in a lower earning household, at

0:09:40.080 --> 0:09:43.040
<v Speaker 1>least assuming that the system is working as intended. So

0:09:43.080 --> 0:09:45.040
<v Speaker 1>in some ways you can look at this as being

0:09:45.280 --> 0:09:48.640
<v Speaker 1>kind right, bringing the cost of products to within the

0:09:48.679 --> 0:09:53.000
<v Speaker 1>budget of lower earning customers. But that's not really what

0:09:53.040 --> 0:09:55.920
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about here. We're talking about finding the price

0:09:56.360 --> 0:10:00.440
<v Speaker 1>that you can set as your maximum before going to

0:10:00.520 --> 0:10:02.920
<v Speaker 1>a point where people will just not buy anything at all.

0:10:03.280 --> 0:10:06.280
<v Speaker 1>You want to find that spot where someone is going

0:10:06.320 --> 0:10:09.360
<v Speaker 1>to hand over money. It might hurt, but they're gonna

0:10:09.360 --> 0:10:12.480
<v Speaker 1>do it because they need the thing, And it's essentially

0:10:12.520 --> 0:10:15.199
<v Speaker 1>price gouging, right. And when you flip it over, when

0:10:15.240 --> 0:10:18.640
<v Speaker 1>you say this is charging more for the same stuff

0:10:18.679 --> 0:10:21.320
<v Speaker 1>because the person who's doing the shopping is a big earner,

0:10:21.720 --> 0:10:24.600
<v Speaker 1>that feels wrong too. And yet this is something that

0:10:24.760 --> 0:10:28.640
<v Speaker 1>dynamic pricing could end up doing. In fact, it's more

0:10:28.679 --> 0:10:32.080
<v Speaker 1>than could end up doing. I'll explain more, but first

0:10:32.160 --> 0:10:44.120
<v Speaker 1>let's take a quick break. So before the break, I

0:10:44.200 --> 0:10:48.080
<v Speaker 1>was talking about this sort of situation in which a

0:10:48.280 --> 0:10:54.120
<v Speaker 1>store could use dynamic pricing to potentially personalize the shopping

0:10:54.200 --> 0:10:58.480
<v Speaker 1>experience so that certain individuals would end up having to

0:10:58.480 --> 0:11:02.840
<v Speaker 1>pay more for specific items versus others. Like you could

0:11:02.880 --> 0:11:05.559
<v Speaker 1>have all the people in the store at the same time,

0:11:05.679 --> 0:11:08.880
<v Speaker 1>and they'd each have an individual experience of how much

0:11:09.480 --> 0:11:12.840
<v Speaker 1>each particular item would cost. Here in the United States,

0:11:12.920 --> 0:11:16.439
<v Speaker 1>the grocery store chain Kroger is facing some scrutiny from

0:11:16.520 --> 0:11:20.600
<v Speaker 1>legislators like Senators Elizabeth Warren and Bob Casey over the

0:11:20.640 --> 0:11:25.760
<v Speaker 1>implementation of dynamic pricing that is at least in part

0:11:26.120 --> 0:11:29.760
<v Speaker 1>driven by AI. So the chain makes use of digital

0:11:29.800 --> 0:11:33.199
<v Speaker 1>price labels, and around eighteen percent of its stores I

0:11:33.240 --> 0:11:37.040
<v Speaker 1>think it's like five hundred locations across the United States.

0:11:37.080 --> 0:11:40.400
<v Speaker 1>They own and operate like twenty seven hundred and fifty,

0:11:40.800 --> 0:11:43.840
<v Speaker 1>so five hundred is around a little less than twenty

0:11:43.840 --> 0:11:47.440
<v Speaker 1>percent of their stores. But they have these digital price tags,

0:11:47.840 --> 0:11:51.320
<v Speaker 1>and of course with digital price tags, you could change

0:11:51.320 --> 0:11:54.719
<v Speaker 1>the price of things instantly. When the store makes use

0:11:54.760 --> 0:11:58.360
<v Speaker 1>of proper labels like paper labels, I guess I shouldn't

0:11:58.360 --> 0:12:02.840
<v Speaker 1>say proper. That's being really biased. Paper labels, well, there's

0:12:02.880 --> 0:12:05.680
<v Speaker 1>not really the opportunity to switch things up so quickly.

0:12:05.720 --> 0:12:09.840
<v Speaker 1>You're not going to have a shelf stocker just walking

0:12:10.280 --> 0:12:13.320
<v Speaker 1>directly ahead of a shopper, paying attention to what the

0:12:13.320 --> 0:12:15.920
<v Speaker 1>shoppers looking at and then slapping a new label on

0:12:16.520 --> 0:12:19.000
<v Speaker 1>in order to change the price. That's not going to happen.

0:12:19.240 --> 0:12:22.680
<v Speaker 1>But in these Kroger stores with the digital labels, it's

0:12:22.840 --> 0:12:26.120
<v Speaker 1>entirely possible to change the prices for specific items at

0:12:26.160 --> 0:12:29.679
<v Speaker 1>a moment's notice. Now, let's just say that you have

0:12:29.760 --> 0:12:33.040
<v Speaker 1>these digital labels. You pair this with cameras that have

0:12:33.160 --> 0:12:38.199
<v Speaker 1>things like facial recognition technology, and you gather information about customers.

0:12:38.240 --> 0:12:40.640
<v Speaker 1>Maybe you know a lot about this customer already because

0:12:40.640 --> 0:12:43.840
<v Speaker 1>they're in your loyalty program. Maybe they're using your app,

0:12:44.160 --> 0:12:49.280
<v Speaker 1>and the app is communicating in real time what you're doing,

0:12:49.559 --> 0:12:52.640
<v Speaker 1>Like if you're using it to scan products, it's sending

0:12:52.640 --> 0:12:55.959
<v Speaker 1>that information to the home base. Well, Kroger could dynamically

0:12:56.120 --> 0:12:59.240
<v Speaker 1>change prices as you were actually moving down the aisles,

0:12:59.320 --> 0:13:01.679
<v Speaker 1>and before you can actually look at the digital price,

0:13:01.720 --> 0:13:04.440
<v Speaker 1>the amount has changed from the person ahead of you.

0:13:04.760 --> 0:13:07.920
<v Speaker 1>That amount will be reflected ultimately when you check out

0:13:08.000 --> 0:13:11.439
<v Speaker 1>of the store. So what's more, Kroger has been gathering

0:13:11.440 --> 0:13:15.000
<v Speaker 1>customer information for years because those customer loyalty tags that

0:13:15.040 --> 0:13:17.880
<v Speaker 1>you can get at stores like grocery stores. Kroger has one,

0:13:18.200 --> 0:13:21.760
<v Speaker 1>These entitle you to stuff like discounts, right well, it's

0:13:21.800 --> 0:13:24.679
<v Speaker 1>also a tag that lets the store keep an ongoing

0:13:24.760 --> 0:13:29.320
<v Speaker 1>tallly of everything you've ever purchased there. Through years of

0:13:29.440 --> 0:13:33.679
<v Speaker 1>data gathering, Kroger knows the brands that specific customers gravitate toward,

0:13:34.000 --> 0:13:36.480
<v Speaker 1>So the store knows if a specific customer is more

0:13:36.640 --> 0:13:38.880
<v Speaker 1>likely to go for, you know, whatever brand is on

0:13:39.040 --> 0:13:42.760
<v Speaker 1>sale versus a premium brand. Right, some people have brand

0:13:42.800 --> 0:13:45.760
<v Speaker 1>loyalty and they'll buy that brand no matter if the

0:13:45.760 --> 0:13:50.040
<v Speaker 1>price is up or not. Others are more pragmatic and

0:13:50.080 --> 0:13:54.040
<v Speaker 1>they will go with whichever brand is the cheapest at

0:13:54.080 --> 0:13:57.079
<v Speaker 1>the time, at least cheapest by volume or whatever. And

0:13:57.400 --> 0:13:59.840
<v Speaker 1>Kroger knows this. It also knows like if you prefer

0:13:59.920 --> 0:14:02.920
<v Speaker 1>you're salsa, spicy or mild. You know, it knows what

0:14:03.000 --> 0:14:05.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of so does you drink, and the snacks you

0:14:05.120 --> 0:14:09.160
<v Speaker 1>crave and what impulse buys you're inclined to indulge in

0:14:09.200 --> 0:14:12.480
<v Speaker 1>when you get up there to the cashier. And sure,

0:14:13.080 --> 0:14:15.400
<v Speaker 1>there are ways to use that information that can be

0:14:15.440 --> 0:14:18.680
<v Speaker 1>of benefit both to the store and to the customer.

0:14:19.080 --> 0:14:22.040
<v Speaker 1>But the concern is that through this system Kroger could

0:14:22.040 --> 0:14:26.960
<v Speaker 1>engage in profiling and price gouging. That Kroger could dynamically

0:14:27.080 --> 0:14:31.120
<v Speaker 1>change prices based on factors like race, age or sex.

0:14:31.360 --> 0:14:33.320
<v Speaker 1>Now to be clear, the company has said that the

0:14:33.400 --> 0:14:37.200
<v Speaker 1>idea is to quote lower prices more for customers where

0:14:37.200 --> 0:14:42.160
<v Speaker 1>it matters most end quote, but skeptics remain well skeptical.

0:14:42.520 --> 0:14:46.800
<v Speaker 1>So in an open letter to Kroger's CEO, Senators Warren

0:14:46.880 --> 0:14:50.400
<v Speaker 1>and Casey ask for more information about the digital price

0:14:50.440 --> 0:14:53.920
<v Speaker 1>tags and Kroger's plans, and expressed concerns that the store

0:14:53.960 --> 0:14:58.440
<v Speaker 1>could use customer and world information combined to quote calibrate

0:14:58.560 --> 0:15:02.280
<v Speaker 1>price increases to a distract maximum profits at a time

0:15:02.360 --> 0:15:05.240
<v Speaker 1>when the amount of American's income spent on food is

0:15:05.280 --> 0:15:09.000
<v Speaker 1>at a thirty year high. End quote. The senators pointed

0:15:09.000 --> 0:15:11.840
<v Speaker 1>out that Kroger system could let the store take advantage

0:15:11.880 --> 0:15:15.040
<v Speaker 1>of local conditions. So, for example, let's say that there

0:15:15.160 --> 0:15:18.160
<v Speaker 1>is a big storm that's forecast to hit the area.

0:15:18.520 --> 0:15:20.560
<v Speaker 1>Or let's say you live in a place like my

0:15:20.760 --> 0:15:25.040
<v Speaker 1>hometown of Atlanta, Georgia, where the summer we have had

0:15:25.440 --> 0:15:29.280
<v Speaker 1>numerous water main breaks happening all over the place. Well,

0:15:29.320 --> 0:15:31.800
<v Speaker 1>you might find that a trip to the store means

0:15:31.840 --> 0:15:33.960
<v Speaker 1>that you'll have to pay a premium if you want

0:15:33.960 --> 0:15:36.400
<v Speaker 1>to get that bottled water you're gonna need while there's

0:15:36.440 --> 0:15:39.120
<v Speaker 1>a boil water advisory in place and you have no

0:15:39.280 --> 0:15:43.440
<v Speaker 1>power at home. It's like being kicked when you're down. Now,

0:15:43.800 --> 0:15:47.760
<v Speaker 1>am I saying Kroger is currently doing this, that it

0:15:47.800 --> 0:15:53.280
<v Speaker 1>is proactively raising prices when there's a prediction that demands

0:15:53.280 --> 0:15:56.240
<v Speaker 1>going to surge. I am not saying that. I'm saying

0:15:56.280 --> 0:15:59.320
<v Speaker 1>that the system allows for it to happen and to

0:15:59.360 --> 0:16:02.200
<v Speaker 1>do it quickly. And that's before you get to the

0:16:02.240 --> 0:16:06.600
<v Speaker 1>potential issue of personalized pricing. I mean, the whole purpose

0:16:06.640 --> 0:16:11.080
<v Speaker 1>of the system ultimately is to maximize profit. That might

0:16:11.600 --> 0:16:14.080
<v Speaker 1>mean that you're doing it in service of the customer,

0:16:14.280 --> 0:16:17.960
<v Speaker 1>but it's not through an altruistic desire to help the customer.

0:16:18.000 --> 0:16:20.600
<v Speaker 1>It's because that's the way you're going to end up

0:16:20.600 --> 0:16:23.200
<v Speaker 1>making more money. And if it turns out that that's

0:16:23.320 --> 0:16:25.720
<v Speaker 1>not the way you're going to make more money, then

0:16:25.760 --> 0:16:28.520
<v Speaker 1>it's not going to happen. The letter is a really

0:16:28.560 --> 0:16:31.960
<v Speaker 1>good read, and it isn't just a letter. The senators

0:16:32.000 --> 0:16:34.960
<v Speaker 1>cite specific reference materials. In fact, there are certain pages

0:16:34.960 --> 0:16:39.040
<v Speaker 1>where the references take up more space on the page

0:16:39.360 --> 0:16:42.040
<v Speaker 1>than the letter does, but they really show that they've

0:16:42.080 --> 0:16:46.320
<v Speaker 1>done their homework like this isn't just them pontificating and

0:16:46.480 --> 0:16:50.400
<v Speaker 1>theorizing that there's an issue. They're citing sources. They point

0:16:50.440 --> 0:16:52.560
<v Speaker 1>out that it's not just Kroger that's rolling out a

0:16:52.560 --> 0:16:57.160
<v Speaker 1>system that's like this. Retailers like Walmart are doing it too. Meanwhile,

0:16:57.440 --> 0:16:59.960
<v Speaker 1>several companies are really eager to find ways to let

0:17:00.200 --> 0:17:02.640
<v Speaker 1>JI to figure out just how much money they can

0:17:02.720 --> 0:17:05.760
<v Speaker 1>charge for their goods and services without taking off the

0:17:05.800 --> 0:17:09.479
<v Speaker 1>customer base and driving them to competitors. Forbes magazine has

0:17:09.520 --> 0:17:14.040
<v Speaker 1>an article titled Harnessing AI for Dynamic Pricing for Your Business,

0:17:14.240 --> 0:17:16.560
<v Speaker 1>and it talks about this, and it was written by

0:17:16.640 --> 0:17:20.520
<v Speaker 1>a writer and business advisor named Neil Sahota, who explains

0:17:20.520 --> 0:17:24.480
<v Speaker 1>that AI boosts the concept of dynamic pricing quote by

0:17:24.560 --> 0:17:30.240
<v Speaker 1>analyzing vast data sets to predict demand fluctuations, understand customer

0:17:30.400 --> 0:17:34.960
<v Speaker 1>price sensitivity, and identify the optimal price point that maximizes

0:17:35.040 --> 0:17:39.080
<v Speaker 1>revenue or market share end quote. Now, if we examine

0:17:39.119 --> 0:17:43.840
<v Speaker 1>that statement closely, it can start to get sinister is

0:17:43.880 --> 0:17:47.919
<v Speaker 1>probably not the right word, but certainly predatory could be

0:17:48.240 --> 0:17:51.960
<v Speaker 1>a word I could use. Because you're talking about understanding

0:17:52.000 --> 0:17:56.600
<v Speaker 1>customer price sensitivity. That phrase just means knowing how much

0:17:56.640 --> 0:18:01.520
<v Speaker 1>you can charge before your customers decide they've had enough. Right, Like,

0:18:01.720 --> 0:18:05.760
<v Speaker 1>the wording kind of falls into that. Let's couch this

0:18:05.880 --> 0:18:10.360
<v Speaker 1>in a way so it doesn't sounds as predatory as

0:18:10.400 --> 0:18:12.760
<v Speaker 1>it is, but it's really all about how much can

0:18:12.800 --> 0:18:16.800
<v Speaker 1>I charge you before you walk away from me? So yeah,

0:18:16.359 --> 0:18:19.480
<v Speaker 1>it's a little scary. But in other words, the AI

0:18:19.640 --> 0:18:22.000
<v Speaker 1>might also be taking into account, you know, like I said,

0:18:22.040 --> 0:18:24.320
<v Speaker 1>how much people are willing to pay before they just

0:18:24.359 --> 0:18:26.199
<v Speaker 1>get fed up with the company and move on. And

0:18:26.240 --> 0:18:29.000
<v Speaker 1>on one hand, all I'm really talking about here is

0:18:29.000 --> 0:18:31.639
<v Speaker 1>a more real time approach to something that businesses have

0:18:31.720 --> 0:18:34.840
<v Speaker 1>been doing forever. It's not like there's some sort of

0:18:34.960 --> 0:18:38.560
<v Speaker 1>oracle out there that dictates what the price should be

0:18:38.640 --> 0:18:42.080
<v Speaker 1>for a gallon of milk or a vacuum cleaner or

0:18:42.119 --> 0:18:45.560
<v Speaker 1>a new car. These prices are determined by the companies

0:18:45.560 --> 0:18:48.400
<v Speaker 1>that sell the things, and the companies are taking into

0:18:48.400 --> 0:18:52.080
<v Speaker 1>account lots of factors that contribute to the cost that

0:18:52.119 --> 0:18:55.240
<v Speaker 1>they incur in providing those goods and services in the

0:18:55.240 --> 0:18:58.880
<v Speaker 1>first place. Right, Like, nothing is free, a company has

0:18:59.000 --> 0:19:01.840
<v Speaker 1>to take that into accoun out or else the cost

0:19:01.920 --> 0:19:04.399
<v Speaker 1>of doing business will be greater than what revenue it

0:19:04.480 --> 0:19:08.000
<v Speaker 1>pulls in, and ultimately the business will fail. So you

0:19:08.080 --> 0:19:11.560
<v Speaker 1>can't put all the blame on companies. You can't just

0:19:11.680 --> 0:19:16.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, reduce them to greedy capitalists or something along

0:19:16.200 --> 0:19:19.840
<v Speaker 1>those lines, although that can if they could turn into that, certainly,

0:19:19.880 --> 0:19:23.760
<v Speaker 1>but that's the way business works. You gotta make money

0:19:24.200 --> 0:19:26.440
<v Speaker 1>or else there's no reason to do the thing anymore.

0:19:26.720 --> 0:19:29.720
<v Speaker 1>But I think it's the immediacy of AI power dynamic

0:19:29.760 --> 0:19:32.560
<v Speaker 1>pricing that really gives me the willies, as well as

0:19:32.600 --> 0:19:35.960
<v Speaker 1>the ability to respond to or even predict conditions that

0:19:36.040 --> 0:19:39.760
<v Speaker 1>will lead to increased demand, allowing for price gouging opportunities.

0:19:40.080 --> 0:19:44.879
<v Speaker 1>But don't worry, it gets worse. Okay, I'll explain how,

0:19:45.119 --> 0:19:56.800
<v Speaker 1>but first let's take another quick break. We're back, and

0:19:56.840 --> 0:20:00.679
<v Speaker 1>one other element that really comes into play when we

0:20:00.720 --> 0:20:04.240
<v Speaker 1>are talking about AI and price strategies and dynamic pricing

0:20:04.520 --> 0:20:07.800
<v Speaker 1>is the concept of competition. Now, if I own a

0:20:07.800 --> 0:20:10.760
<v Speaker 1>grocery store and I decide I really want to squeeze

0:20:10.800 --> 0:20:14.520
<v Speaker 1>every penny I possibly can from every shopper that I

0:20:14.680 --> 0:20:17.520
<v Speaker 1>possibly can, and if I'm the only game in town,

0:20:17.760 --> 0:20:19.800
<v Speaker 1>well I guess I'll get away with it, or I'll

0:20:19.840 --> 0:20:21.760
<v Speaker 1>get run out of town one of the two, but

0:20:21.920 --> 0:20:24.960
<v Speaker 1>presuming there are at least a few other grocers in

0:20:25.000 --> 0:20:28.000
<v Speaker 1>the area, my customers will have alternatives to my store,

0:20:28.200 --> 0:20:31.320
<v Speaker 1>and if they feel that my prices are unfair, they

0:20:31.320 --> 0:20:34.160
<v Speaker 1>can move to the competition, So that creates an incentive

0:20:34.200 --> 0:20:38.600
<v Speaker 1>for me to lower my prices. However, let's imagine we

0:20:38.880 --> 0:20:42.000
<v Speaker 1>have a group of business owners and all of them

0:20:42.119 --> 0:20:47.560
<v Speaker 1>are employing aipower dynamic pricing. They're not talking with each other,

0:20:47.640 --> 0:20:51.520
<v Speaker 1>but they're all using the same or similar tools in

0:20:51.600 --> 0:20:54.439
<v Speaker 1>order to figure out how much to price stuff. Now,

0:20:54.520 --> 0:20:56.880
<v Speaker 1>all the competition is on a similar level, and it's

0:20:56.920 --> 0:21:01.080
<v Speaker 1>possible that one business, by calculating thee at the competitors

0:21:01.080 --> 0:21:04.800
<v Speaker 1>have increased prices, might actually lower prices on their items

0:21:04.920 --> 0:21:07.760
<v Speaker 1>or to lure people away from the competition. But it's

0:21:07.880 --> 0:21:11.680
<v Speaker 1>more likely that the AI will effectively set prices across

0:21:11.720 --> 0:21:14.399
<v Speaker 1>the board so that no matter where a customer goes,

0:21:14.440 --> 0:21:17.480
<v Speaker 1>they're going to face higher prices than they would like,

0:21:17.880 --> 0:21:20.840
<v Speaker 1>as high as the market will allow, and you end

0:21:20.960 --> 0:21:25.000
<v Speaker 1>up with an AI powered cartel. In other words, this

0:21:25.119 --> 0:21:29.000
<v Speaker 1>is not hypothetical. We have seen this play out in

0:21:29.040 --> 0:21:32.200
<v Speaker 1>certain businesses in certain parts of the world. For instance,

0:21:33.040 --> 0:21:35.959
<v Speaker 1>there are people who allege that this is happening in

0:21:36.080 --> 0:21:39.600
<v Speaker 1>rental housing. We turn to the tail of a software

0:21:39.640 --> 0:21:43.800
<v Speaker 1>package called real Page from the company with the same name.

0:21:44.320 --> 0:21:48.399
<v Speaker 1>So the company Real Page formed out of various acquisitions

0:21:48.440 --> 0:21:53.200
<v Speaker 1>over several years, but its main product is property management

0:21:53.240 --> 0:21:57.000
<v Speaker 1>systems for landlords, and one thing the software does is

0:21:57.040 --> 0:22:01.480
<v Speaker 1>suggest rental fees for the landlord's properties. Now, the landlord

0:22:01.560 --> 0:22:05.080
<v Speaker 1>first has to feed a lot of data into the system,

0:22:05.119 --> 0:22:09.080
<v Speaker 1>including data that would not be publicly available, at least

0:22:09.080 --> 0:22:12.159
<v Speaker 1>not to the general public. So that would include stuff

0:22:12.200 --> 0:22:15.639
<v Speaker 1>like how many units the landlord oversees, how many of

0:22:15.680 --> 0:22:19.080
<v Speaker 1>those are vacant, how much is being charged in rent

0:22:19.160 --> 0:22:22.959
<v Speaker 1>at the moment, etc. Now, Real Page's power comes from

0:22:23.000 --> 0:22:26.399
<v Speaker 1>the fact that it's an incredibly popular piece of software

0:22:26.760 --> 0:22:30.200
<v Speaker 1>and lots of landlords depend upon it, which means real

0:22:30.240 --> 0:22:34.040
<v Speaker 1>Page has access to a ton of data. So not

0:22:34.160 --> 0:22:37.520
<v Speaker 1>only is real Page suggesting a rental price based off

0:22:37.920 --> 0:22:42.719
<v Speaker 1>one landlord's specific situation, it's taking into account other rental

0:22:42.760 --> 0:22:46.920
<v Speaker 1>properties managed by other landlords in the area and what

0:22:47.000 --> 0:22:49.840
<v Speaker 1>those rental fees amount to. And this can mean that

0:22:49.920 --> 0:22:54.080
<v Speaker 1>collectively Real Page starts to nudge markets into a sort

0:22:54.119 --> 0:22:57.760
<v Speaker 1>of price fixed cartel. See. The whole goal of the

0:22:57.840 --> 0:23:01.159
<v Speaker 1>software is to find that sweet spot in which landlords

0:23:01.160 --> 0:23:04.159
<v Speaker 1>will maximize profits. So how much can you charge for

0:23:04.200 --> 0:23:07.639
<v Speaker 1>your rental property before folks just pass it over? You

0:23:07.640 --> 0:23:10.000
<v Speaker 1>don't want to underprice your property. You don't want to

0:23:10.080 --> 0:23:12.479
<v Speaker 1>leave money on the table, But you also don't want

0:23:12.520 --> 0:23:14.520
<v Speaker 1>to price it so high that no one's going to

0:23:14.560 --> 0:23:17.360
<v Speaker 1>rent it and it just remains vacant. So real Page's

0:23:17.400 --> 0:23:20.480
<v Speaker 1>purpose is to arrive at the magic number that's going

0:23:20.520 --> 0:23:24.760
<v Speaker 1>to result in the most profit for its customers. The

0:23:24.880 --> 0:23:29.440
<v Speaker 1>landlords now applied to a single location, like a single

0:23:29.520 --> 0:23:34.119
<v Speaker 1>apartment complex. Arguably, this might not be so bad as

0:23:34.200 --> 0:23:36.760
<v Speaker 1>long as people living in the rental property feel they're

0:23:36.760 --> 0:23:39.600
<v Speaker 1>getting value for their money, it's not a huge issue.

0:23:39.680 --> 0:23:42.160
<v Speaker 1>But when you start to apply this across a region,

0:23:42.480 --> 0:23:44.800
<v Speaker 1>you reach a point where the rental market has little

0:23:44.840 --> 0:23:48.439
<v Speaker 1>to no competition and people will struggle to afford a

0:23:48.480 --> 0:23:51.320
<v Speaker 1>place to live. There will be no alternatives they can

0:23:51.400 --> 0:23:54.919
<v Speaker 1>turn to. They'll just be looking at kind of a

0:23:55.040 --> 0:23:59.359
<v Speaker 1>landscape of high prices across the board. Critics of real

0:23:59.440 --> 0:24:03.400
<v Speaker 1>Page have argued that the third party software has led

0:24:03.440 --> 0:24:07.040
<v Speaker 1>to an anti competitive marketplace and that it turns landlords

0:24:07.080 --> 0:24:10.840
<v Speaker 1>into a monopoly, even if the landlords themselves are unaware

0:24:10.880 --> 0:24:15.120
<v Speaker 1>of this, and some critics are from really important positions

0:24:15.119 --> 0:24:18.800
<v Speaker 1>and authority. For example, back in twenty seventeen, a member

0:24:18.800 --> 0:24:22.600
<v Speaker 1>of the Federal Trade Commission named Maureen Ohlhausen argued that

0:24:22.960 --> 0:24:27.760
<v Speaker 1>algorithmically driven price strategies applied across multiple landlords is really

0:24:27.800 --> 0:24:31.320
<v Speaker 1>no different from a human being collecting all this information

0:24:31.359 --> 0:24:34.000
<v Speaker 1>and then telling all the competitors how to fix their

0:24:34.040 --> 0:24:37.119
<v Speaker 1>prices so that they can maximize profits and not worry

0:24:37.160 --> 0:24:40.200
<v Speaker 1>about competition. Now, that would be against the law if

0:24:40.240 --> 0:24:42.960
<v Speaker 1>a human being did it, and she was saying, maybe

0:24:42.960 --> 0:24:48.240
<v Speaker 1>we should consider something similar for algorithmically driven strategies, because

0:24:48.240 --> 0:24:53.040
<v Speaker 1>technically that's not accounted for in the laws. Real Page

0:24:53.240 --> 0:24:57.280
<v Speaker 1>is a defendant named in several lawsuits that have accused

0:24:57.280 --> 0:25:01.399
<v Speaker 1>the company of anti competitive practices. J Karma has a

0:25:01.440 --> 0:25:04.879
<v Speaker 1>great piece on this titled We're entering an AI price

0:25:04.960 --> 0:25:09.520
<v Speaker 1>fixing dystopia in the Atlantic, and that explains the Atlantic

0:25:09.560 --> 0:25:12.159
<v Speaker 1>is where the article's from. We're not entering an AI

0:25:12.200 --> 0:25:16.760
<v Speaker 1>price fixing dystopia in the Atlantic anyway. This article explains

0:25:16.760 --> 0:25:19.800
<v Speaker 1>how plaintifs I've argued that Real Page is essentially the

0:25:19.880 --> 0:25:23.679
<v Speaker 1>lynch pen that's holding together a monopoly among landlords, at

0:25:23.760 --> 0:25:26.560
<v Speaker 1>least in certain regions. And among the bits that Karma

0:25:26.640 --> 0:25:30.280
<v Speaker 1>reveals is that Real Page allegedly strong arms its clients,

0:25:30.359 --> 0:25:33.680
<v Speaker 1>so the landlords, in other words, to adopt the price

0:25:33.680 --> 0:25:37.920
<v Speaker 1>suggestions that Real Page it submits, or else those landlords

0:25:38.000 --> 0:25:41.400
<v Speaker 1>risk getting the boot from the company. Karma has quoted

0:25:41.560 --> 0:25:45.200
<v Speaker 1>an antitrust lawyer for the American Economic Liberties Project named

0:25:45.280 --> 0:25:50.040
<v Speaker 1>Lee Hepner, who says, quote enforced compliance is the hallmark

0:25:50.080 --> 0:25:53.320
<v Speaker 1>feature of any cartel end quote. The company I feel

0:25:53.359 --> 0:25:56.200
<v Speaker 1>I should add disputes these claims and says that they

0:25:56.280 --> 0:26:00.160
<v Speaker 1>are baseless. Karma also points out that in the United States,

0:26:00.200 --> 0:26:04.959
<v Speaker 1>winning a case against a company that is allegedly responsible

0:26:04.960 --> 0:26:09.280
<v Speaker 1>for anti competitive collusion is really tough because antitrust laws

0:26:09.359 --> 0:26:12.720
<v Speaker 1>do not take into account this particular situation. In your

0:26:12.800 --> 0:26:16.119
<v Speaker 1>good old fashioned price fixing arrangement, you've got two or

0:26:16.119 --> 0:26:20.000
<v Speaker 1>more entities that meet and they agree upon pricing, they

0:26:20.040 --> 0:26:23.200
<v Speaker 1>remove competition from a region, and they milk the consumer

0:26:23.280 --> 0:26:25.240
<v Speaker 1>for all their worth. But you have to prove that

0:26:25.240 --> 0:26:28.639
<v Speaker 1>there's collusion between these two or more parties. Right. However,

0:26:28.680 --> 0:26:31.280
<v Speaker 1>in this case, we're not talking about two entities that

0:26:31.320 --> 0:26:34.439
<v Speaker 1>are in direct communication with one another. It's possible they

0:26:34.720 --> 0:26:37.000
<v Speaker 1>never met at all, they don't even know each other.

0:26:37.119 --> 0:26:40.200
<v Speaker 1>They just both happen to use the same software package.

0:26:40.359 --> 0:26:43.200
<v Speaker 1>So it's the software doing all the work of collusion,

0:26:43.440 --> 0:26:47.080
<v Speaker 1>and you don't have any actual, traditional direct collusion between

0:26:47.119 --> 0:26:50.040
<v Speaker 1>the parties themselves. And since the law doesn't account for

0:26:50.080 --> 0:26:54.000
<v Speaker 1>this in most places, there's really no recourse unless laws

0:26:54.000 --> 0:26:56.760
<v Speaker 1>are amended or new laws proposed to deal with the situation.

0:26:57.160 --> 0:26:59.800
<v Speaker 1>We're kind of in a bit of a fix. But wait,

0:27:00.400 --> 0:27:03.560
<v Speaker 1>it gets worse. We don't even need a situation in

0:27:03.560 --> 0:27:07.200
<v Speaker 1>which everyone is using the same software package. With Real Page.

0:27:07.240 --> 0:27:10.080
<v Speaker 1>There's a dispute between how many landlords actually use it.

0:27:10.320 --> 0:27:14.480
<v Speaker 1>University of Tennessee law professor Maurice Stuck says that more

0:27:14.520 --> 0:27:18.040
<v Speaker 1>than forty markets in the US sees thirty to sixty

0:27:18.080 --> 0:27:23.879
<v Speaker 1>percent of landlords of multifamily apartment units relying upon real

0:27:23.920 --> 0:27:29.080
<v Speaker 1>Page for their pricing strategies. Now, the company released a

0:27:29.119 --> 0:27:32.639
<v Speaker 1>statement arguing that it's only used in seven percent of

0:27:33.280 --> 0:27:37.840
<v Speaker 1>rental units. Karma, however, points out that this is largely

0:27:37.880 --> 0:27:41.680
<v Speaker 1>because Real Page is talking about all rental properties, every

0:27:41.680 --> 0:27:45.920
<v Speaker 1>single one, whereas what Stuck was saying was specifically multifamily

0:27:45.960 --> 0:27:48.840
<v Speaker 1>apartment buildings. But even if we're talking at the low

0:27:48.960 --> 0:27:52.080
<v Speaker 1>end of usage, if other landlords are using other property

0:27:52.080 --> 0:27:56.240
<v Speaker 1>management software packages with price strategy driven by AI, you

0:27:56.280 --> 0:27:59.920
<v Speaker 1>can arrive at the same outcome. So Maurice Stuck also

0:28:00.000 --> 0:28:02.879
<v Speaker 1>so studied the case in Germany in which two different

0:28:02.920 --> 0:28:07.480
<v Speaker 1>gas stations, each using a different pricing algorithm, saw their

0:28:07.520 --> 0:28:11.440
<v Speaker 1>margins increase by thirty eight percent once both of them

0:28:11.520 --> 0:28:15.600
<v Speaker 1>were using these algorithms. Now earlier, when just one of

0:28:15.640 --> 0:28:19.679
<v Speaker 1>them had employed a pricing algorithm, its price margin didn't

0:28:19.760 --> 0:28:22.520
<v Speaker 1>change at all. It was only when each of them

0:28:22.800 --> 0:28:26.840
<v Speaker 1>were on their own pricing algorithms that the situation changed.

0:28:27.160 --> 0:28:30.240
<v Speaker 1>So clearly, if you're a business owner, the lesson is

0:28:30.280 --> 0:28:35.040
<v Speaker 1>that AI driven pricing strategies make you more money. They

0:28:35.119 --> 0:28:39.280
<v Speaker 1>are more profitable, so the incentive is clear it is

0:28:39.400 --> 0:28:43.160
<v Speaker 1>best to get on board. For customers, it's much worse

0:28:43.200 --> 0:28:45.960
<v Speaker 1>news because it means you're being hit by the effects

0:28:46.080 --> 0:28:50.440
<v Speaker 1>of collusion, even if what's actually going on isn't collusion.

0:28:50.560 --> 0:28:54.160
<v Speaker 1>From the traditional legal perspective, the legal thing is likely

0:28:54.200 --> 0:28:56.240
<v Speaker 1>to be an issue for a while because it takes

0:28:56.280 --> 0:28:59.200
<v Speaker 1>time for laws to change, especially at a big scale.

0:29:00.080 --> 0:29:03.280
<v Speaker 1>All our regions have already taken steps. However, San Francisco

0:29:03.480 --> 0:29:06.960
<v Speaker 1>recently passed an ordinance that forbids companies from using price

0:29:06.960 --> 0:29:10.440
<v Speaker 1>strategy software that makes use of non public data among

0:29:10.480 --> 0:29:13.520
<v Speaker 1>competitors in an effort to arrive at prices. So that's

0:29:13.560 --> 0:29:16.280
<v Speaker 1>good news for the folks of San Francisco, a region

0:29:16.320 --> 0:29:20.880
<v Speaker 1>where it is monstrously expensive, like the cost of living

0:29:20.920 --> 0:29:25.280
<v Speaker 1>in San Francisco is truly out of this world. Now,

0:29:25.320 --> 0:29:28.479
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure we're going to see regulations and laws follow

0:29:28.520 --> 0:29:31.040
<v Speaker 1>at some point to protect the free market, if not

0:29:31.240 --> 0:29:35.000
<v Speaker 1>the customer, unless, of course, the company's profiting off these

0:29:35.040 --> 0:29:39.520
<v Speaker 1>practices lobby hard enough to prevent any opposition to form

0:29:39.560 --> 0:29:43.280
<v Speaker 1>within the government. But come on, how likely is that? Hi,

0:29:43.360 --> 0:29:48.200
<v Speaker 1>for one, welcome our robot overgrossers. Okay, that's it about

0:29:48.240 --> 0:29:52.400
<v Speaker 1>how AI can help business owners, but in the same

0:29:52.760 --> 0:29:56.640
<v Speaker 1>breath create an environment of collusion that hurts the consumer.

0:29:56.960 --> 0:29:59.280
<v Speaker 1>And I don't think this is always going to be

0:29:59.320 --> 0:30:01.240
<v Speaker 1>the case, but I think I think if we are

0:30:01.320 --> 0:30:05.600
<v Speaker 1>depending upon AI for pricing strategy, it's more likely to

0:30:05.600 --> 0:30:10.200
<v Speaker 1>happen than not, because if the mandate is find the

0:30:10.240 --> 0:30:13.800
<v Speaker 1>way where I'm going to make the most money. Ultimately,

0:30:13.840 --> 0:30:16.920
<v Speaker 1>this is where we arrive, right, There's no there's no

0:30:17.000 --> 0:30:22.560
<v Speaker 1>other destination but the effects of collusion. That's the only

0:30:22.720 --> 0:30:25.600
<v Speaker 1>place you can go to. And the only alternative would

0:30:25.640 --> 0:30:28.880
<v Speaker 1>be businesses that don't get on the AI train, that

0:30:29.040 --> 0:30:33.120
<v Speaker 1>do try to compete by offering lower prices. And whether

0:30:33.240 --> 0:30:36.000
<v Speaker 1>or not that works, I can't say. I suppose in

0:30:36.040 --> 0:30:40.080
<v Speaker 1>the short term it could force the AI driven strategies

0:30:40.160 --> 0:30:45.160
<v Speaker 1>to adjust so that they're not being completely drained of

0:30:45.240 --> 0:30:48.640
<v Speaker 1>customers by the competition, But I imagine there'd be a

0:30:48.800 --> 0:30:52.080
<v Speaker 1>great deal of pressure to get that other business to

0:30:52.520 --> 0:30:55.720
<v Speaker 1>get on board, you know, be a team player, even

0:30:55.760 --> 0:30:58.400
<v Speaker 1>though it's legal to be in a team like that.

0:30:59.120 --> 0:31:01.720
<v Speaker 1>I hope all of you out there are doing well,

0:31:02.320 --> 0:31:11.760
<v Speaker 1>and I will talk to you again really soon. Tech

0:31:11.840 --> 0:31:16.240
<v Speaker 1>Stuff is an iHeartRadio production. For more podcasts from iHeartRadio,

0:31:16.560 --> 0:31:20.280
<v Speaker 1>visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen

0:31:20.320 --> 0:31:24.840
<v Speaker 1>to your favorite shows.