WEBVTT - Bloomberg Surveillance TV: April 1st, 2026

0:00:00.040 --> 0:00:06.720
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news.

0:00:11.640 --> 0:00:15.440
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Jonathan Ferrow, along

0:00:15.480 --> 0:00:18.680
<v Speaker 2>with Lisa Bromwitz and Amrie Hordert. Join us each day

0:00:18.720 --> 0:00:22.280
<v Speaker 2>for insight from the best in markets, economics, and geopolitics

0:00:22.400 --> 0:00:24.880
<v Speaker 2>from our global headquarters in New York City. We are

0:00:24.920 --> 0:00:27.680
<v Speaker 2>live on Bloomberg Television weekday mornings from six to nine

0:00:27.720 --> 0:00:31.280
<v Speaker 2>am Eastern. Subscribe to the podcast on Apple, Spotify or

0:00:31.320 --> 0:00:33.919
<v Speaker 2>anywhere else you listen, and as always on the Bloomberg

0:00:34.000 --> 0:00:35.840
<v Speaker 2>Terminal and the Bloomberg Business app.

0:00:36.400 --> 0:00:37.040
<v Speaker 1>Here's the latest.

0:00:37.080 --> 0:00:39.920
<v Speaker 2>This morning, the President slamming NATO, telling the Telegraph he

0:00:40.000 --> 0:00:42.479
<v Speaker 2>is strongly considering pulling the United States out of the

0:00:42.520 --> 0:00:45.520
<v Speaker 2>Alliance as members refuse to join the war with Iran

0:00:45.800 --> 0:00:48.360
<v Speaker 2>joining US. Now is Admiral Pierre van Die, the NATO

0:00:48.400 --> 0:00:51.919
<v Speaker 2>commander for Transformation. Admiral, welcome to the program, sir. I'll

0:00:51.960 --> 0:00:54.520
<v Speaker 2>share with you what the President said to the Telegraph.

0:00:54.840 --> 0:00:56.960
<v Speaker 2>In their story this morning, they say the President was

0:00:57.000 --> 0:01:00.280
<v Speaker 2>asked if he would consider reconsider the US's membersh ship

0:01:00.320 --> 0:01:03.040
<v Speaker 2>of the Alliance after the conflict. He said, quote, oh yes,

0:01:03.320 --> 0:01:06.320
<v Speaker 2>I would say it's beyond reconsideration. I was never swayed

0:01:06.319 --> 0:01:09.160
<v Speaker 2>by NATO. I always knew they were a paper tiger,

0:01:09.440 --> 0:01:12.760
<v Speaker 2>and Putin knows that too. By the way, Admiral, what's

0:01:12.800 --> 0:01:15.480
<v Speaker 2>your reaction to that quote and what's the future of

0:01:15.520 --> 0:01:16.160
<v Speaker 2>this alliance?

0:01:17.440 --> 0:01:18.560
<v Speaker 3>So thank you for having me.

0:01:18.600 --> 0:01:21.720
<v Speaker 4>It's the first time I'm on a US TV or life,

0:01:22.120 --> 0:01:24.200
<v Speaker 4>so I'm very happy to be able to share some

0:01:24.240 --> 0:01:28.160
<v Speaker 4>comments with you. So well clearly understand that we themity

0:01:28.360 --> 0:01:32.360
<v Speaker 4>are not maneuvering on the political level. So I will

0:01:32.360 --> 0:01:36.720
<v Speaker 4>not commend this debate, which is a strong one, which

0:01:36.800 --> 0:01:41.039
<v Speaker 4>is about the transathletical inks and how the things go

0:01:41.160 --> 0:01:42.080
<v Speaker 4>on the political side.

0:01:42.160 --> 0:01:43.360
<v Speaker 3>I think what we have in.

0:01:43.240 --> 0:01:46.960
<v Speaker 4>Front of us is a world where the crisis is

0:01:46.959 --> 0:01:49.280
<v Speaker 4>not any more the good understanding of how the things

0:01:49.320 --> 0:01:53.000
<v Speaker 4>are going. It's much more a question of shock. If

0:01:53.040 --> 0:02:00.080
<v Speaker 4>I may an image, A crisis is when you're the

0:02:00.080 --> 0:02:01.600
<v Speaker 4>ties of your car are flat.

0:02:03.040 --> 0:02:05.160
<v Speaker 3>A shock is what you hit a tree.

0:02:05.480 --> 0:02:08.160
<v Speaker 4>We are in a world where hitting trees now it's

0:02:08.240 --> 0:02:10.920
<v Speaker 4>a new normal, and I think for an alliance it's

0:02:10.960 --> 0:02:14.400
<v Speaker 4>a strong, strong challenge to be able to adapt at

0:02:14.440 --> 0:02:16.440
<v Speaker 4>a very high speed to these shocks.

0:02:17.080 --> 0:02:20.400
<v Speaker 2>Admiral, though this goes beyond just politics. This is about

0:02:20.440 --> 0:02:24.720
<v Speaker 2>operational issues for the Alliance. When the UK only allows

0:02:24.720 --> 0:02:27.240
<v Speaker 2>the US to use Basis for limited defensive action.

0:02:27.680 --> 0:02:29.440
<v Speaker 1>When we see reports that Italy is.

0:02:29.360 --> 0:02:32.880
<v Speaker 2>Denying and military aircraft permission to land in Sicily, and

0:02:32.919 --> 0:02:35.160
<v Speaker 2>you have the US questioning whether they should even have

0:02:35.240 --> 0:02:38.400
<v Speaker 2>bases in those places if they can't use them, the

0:02:38.480 --> 0:02:41.480
<v Speaker 2>question still remains, what is the future of this alliance

0:02:41.600 --> 0:02:45.120
<v Speaker 2>From an operational standpoint, what is the future of this alliance?

0:02:46.680 --> 0:02:49.840
<v Speaker 4>I think the strength of the Alliance is to have

0:02:50.120 --> 0:02:55.120
<v Speaker 4>having been able during more than seventy eighteen years to

0:02:55.240 --> 0:02:59.919
<v Speaker 4>discuss and to find a way together. It's the consensus ace,

0:03:00.040 --> 0:03:03.560
<v Speaker 4>which is not driven by majority but by consensus. And

0:03:03.639 --> 0:03:06.040
<v Speaker 4>so that means that you have a unique place in

0:03:06.080 --> 0:03:08.880
<v Speaker 4>the world where you have thirty two nations that discuss

0:03:09.040 --> 0:03:12.920
<v Speaker 4>at political level on a daily basis. And so I

0:03:12.960 --> 0:03:16.400
<v Speaker 4>know that since this war is going on in Ukraine,

0:03:16.480 --> 0:03:20.360
<v Speaker 4>they are very intensive discussion at natal level. It's not

0:03:20.400 --> 0:03:23.760
<v Speaker 4>only the nations themselves one by one with the US,

0:03:24.080 --> 0:03:27.639
<v Speaker 4>it's it's all together in the in the NAC. It's

0:03:27.639 --> 0:03:31.200
<v Speaker 4>a NATO non athnotic console where this discussion occur. And

0:03:31.240 --> 0:03:33.680
<v Speaker 4>I think it's a strength for the West. It's something

0:03:33.680 --> 0:03:36.800
<v Speaker 4>we need never to neglect is the fact that we

0:03:36.880 --> 0:03:40.480
<v Speaker 4>are together. We are committed by bonds, and so we

0:03:40.600 --> 0:03:44.880
<v Speaker 4>need to there always tensions that it's not the first time,

0:03:45.520 --> 0:03:49.280
<v Speaker 4>but we need to to solve this as a united alliance.

0:03:50.680 --> 0:03:54.600
<v Speaker 5>Can the alliance exist though without the support of the United.

0:03:54.360 --> 0:03:58.280
<v Speaker 3>States, This is a great question.

0:03:58.760 --> 0:04:03.720
<v Speaker 4>So mister Trump, during the LA he submits UH last

0:04:03.880 --> 0:04:09.200
<v Speaker 4>summer he achieved to ask to the Allies to spend

0:04:09.240 --> 0:04:12.400
<v Speaker 4>three point five percent of the GDP for their own defense.

0:04:12.720 --> 0:04:15.960
<v Speaker 4>That comes by the fact that the US have other priorities.

0:04:16.160 --> 0:04:19.760
<v Speaker 4>They are not only focused on Europe, and the crisis

0:04:19.800 --> 0:04:22.039
<v Speaker 4>in a round is a good demonstration of what they said.

0:04:22.440 --> 0:04:24.720
<v Speaker 3>So it's a moment for you Open to stand up

0:04:24.960 --> 0:04:25.320
<v Speaker 3>and to.

0:04:25.279 --> 0:04:29.240
<v Speaker 4>Do largely more than they have been habitted to they

0:04:29.240 --> 0:04:33.520
<v Speaker 4>did before during the during the Postcord War decades, UH,

0:04:33.600 --> 0:04:37.160
<v Speaker 4>the Opens have been somehow the free riders of their

0:04:37.200 --> 0:04:41.159
<v Speaker 4>own security. Today there is a great change, and now

0:04:41.200 --> 0:04:43.800
<v Speaker 4>we need to ramp up in all domains and to

0:04:43.880 --> 0:04:47.200
<v Speaker 4>be able not to do without the US, but largely

0:04:47.360 --> 0:04:51.000
<v Speaker 4>with a smaller force of the US given the other

0:04:51.080 --> 0:04:54.560
<v Speaker 4>commitment these US forces up over the world.

0:04:55.120 --> 0:04:57.520
<v Speaker 5>And what is it ability or will to potentially help

0:04:57.560 --> 0:04:59.560
<v Speaker 5>the United States when it comes to reopening the straight

0:04:59.600 --> 0:05:03.040
<v Speaker 5>or hormone A. We're struck by the UK Defense Secretary

0:05:03.080 --> 0:05:07.920
<v Speaker 5>minister in an interview really struggling to answer basic questions

0:05:08.000 --> 0:05:10.800
<v Speaker 5>even about how many frigates the US has the UK

0:05:10.960 --> 0:05:12.760
<v Speaker 5>has presently at the moment.

0:05:15.000 --> 0:05:18.479
<v Speaker 4>So there is we he inher it third years of

0:05:18.520 --> 0:05:22.360
<v Speaker 4>these investments in all domains, in the industry, in the

0:05:22.360 --> 0:05:26.440
<v Speaker 4>weapon stock, bise, in the in themitry, in the number

0:05:26.480 --> 0:05:29.240
<v Speaker 4>of soldiers. So it's not by a flick of a

0:05:29.279 --> 0:05:32.400
<v Speaker 4>switch that will we change that. That means a strong,

0:05:32.640 --> 0:05:35.800
<v Speaker 4>long lasting commitment from the opens to be able to

0:05:35.880 --> 0:05:39.719
<v Speaker 4>ramp up. So we inherit a very bad situation, and

0:05:39.760 --> 0:05:41.240
<v Speaker 4>I think it's time out to wake up.

0:05:41.600 --> 0:05:43.839
<v Speaker 6>Given the fact that there is a lot of questions

0:05:43.960 --> 0:05:48.039
<v Speaker 6>right now about the US and the US's role with NATO.

0:05:48.560 --> 0:05:50.640
<v Speaker 6>How likely is it that in five years NATO will

0:05:50.640 --> 0:05:51.200
<v Speaker 6>still exist.

0:05:53.360 --> 0:05:54.880
<v Speaker 3>It's a very political question.

0:05:55.160 --> 0:05:58.960
<v Speaker 4>I think we don't kill we he inher it a

0:05:59.080 --> 0:06:03.520
<v Speaker 4>system which is a good one. In fact, in other

0:06:03.680 --> 0:06:06.320
<v Speaker 4>parts of the world, I think most of the alliance

0:06:06.360 --> 0:06:09.159
<v Speaker 4>we discuss with, especially in the PACIFY, they are saying

0:06:09.200 --> 0:06:12.000
<v Speaker 4>we should have something that looks like NET. So it

0:06:12.320 --> 0:06:15.719
<v Speaker 4>is how it is, it's it's it's a big organization,

0:06:15.880 --> 0:06:18.320
<v Speaker 4>but it's the one where we discuss on every day.

0:06:18.640 --> 0:06:20.839
<v Speaker 4>You have a more than twelve thousand met read that

0:06:21.000 --> 0:06:23.520
<v Speaker 4>on a daily basis. They work on plants, they work

0:06:23.560 --> 0:06:26.760
<v Speaker 4>on intability, they work on training, they work on concepts.

0:06:26.880 --> 0:06:29.839
<v Speaker 3>So this is a goal in the in Odiens.

0:06:30.200 --> 0:06:32.240
<v Speaker 4>And so I think it's a moment where we need

0:06:32.279 --> 0:06:35.360
<v Speaker 4>to have a cool hands and not saying okay, because

0:06:35.360 --> 0:06:37.479
<v Speaker 4>there is a crisis, we will kill the baby. I

0:06:37.480 --> 0:06:40.039
<v Speaker 4>think it's a moment we have an heritage, we have

0:06:40.120 --> 0:06:43.360
<v Speaker 4>something that works. I think it's a moment where all

0:06:43.440 --> 0:06:45.680
<v Speaker 4>the stakeholders need to be responsible.

0:06:45.960 --> 0:06:48.320
<v Speaker 3>They need to they need to say okay what we

0:06:48.400 --> 0:06:48.800
<v Speaker 3>hearer it?

0:06:49.160 --> 0:06:52.200
<v Speaker 4>And with this, this this alliance, I think there is

0:06:52.240 --> 0:06:55.600
<v Speaker 4>a lot to do still uh and killing it will

0:06:55.640 --> 0:06:57.599
<v Speaker 4>not make the world safer.

0:06:58.400 --> 0:07:01.480
<v Speaker 6>There was some questions about the act that missiles were

0:07:01.520 --> 0:07:05.919
<v Speaker 6>logged at Turkey from Oran and that this potentially could

0:07:06.000 --> 0:07:08.919
<v Speaker 6>engage NATO more directly in the conflict.

0:07:09.440 --> 0:07:10.560
<v Speaker 1>What's your response to that?

0:07:12.040 --> 0:07:15.720
<v Speaker 4>So some measures have been taken by secure It's the

0:07:15.840 --> 0:07:19.640
<v Speaker 4>US General Greenevic, which is in chid of that kind

0:07:19.680 --> 0:07:23.760
<v Speaker 4>of answers uh, and so he has taken measures in

0:07:23.840 --> 0:07:27.560
<v Speaker 4>order to be sure that the NATO AR Area of

0:07:27.640 --> 0:07:32.240
<v Speaker 4>responsibility is well protected against the will of Iran.

0:07:31.960 --> 0:07:34.400
<v Speaker 3>To spread the crisis outside of its borders.

0:07:34.840 --> 0:07:37.200
<v Speaker 2>And well, before you go, can I get clarification on something.

0:07:37.680 --> 0:07:41.560
<v Speaker 2>Can you confirm whether Iran did try to strike the

0:07:41.600 --> 0:07:45.120
<v Speaker 2>Diego Gassia base in the Internet Ocean, because we're still

0:07:45.160 --> 0:07:47.920
<v Speaker 2>trying to gauge what the range actually is. What do

0:07:47.960 --> 0:07:48.800
<v Speaker 2>you know about that?

0:07:49.960 --> 0:07:52.960
<v Speaker 4>So it looks like they have tried to send a

0:07:53.000 --> 0:07:56.120
<v Speaker 4>three stage ballistic missile which is much more looking like

0:07:56.480 --> 0:07:57.400
<v Speaker 4>a commercial rocket.

0:07:57.680 --> 0:07:58.200
<v Speaker 3>I think it was.

0:07:58.400 --> 0:08:01.760
<v Speaker 4>It was a messaging and they are trying to demonstrate

0:08:01.800 --> 0:08:06.640
<v Speaker 4>their their ability to expand and to spill the crisis

0:08:06.680 --> 0:08:08.120
<v Speaker 4>outside of the Middle East.

0:08:08.560 --> 0:08:09.520
<v Speaker 3>It's their strategy.

0:08:10.120 --> 0:08:11.960
<v Speaker 4>And so I think it's a moment where back to

0:08:12.040 --> 0:08:14.600
<v Speaker 4>the Islands, it's a moment where I think we need

0:08:14.640 --> 0:08:18.160
<v Speaker 4>to show that we are united, we are committed to

0:08:18.200 --> 0:08:21.200
<v Speaker 4>defend one billion pre citizen over the world and not

0:08:21.280 --> 0:08:22.320
<v Speaker 4>kill the baby at a.

0:08:22.280 --> 0:08:25.240
<v Speaker 3>Moment of tension with which I fully understand.

0:08:26.040 --> 0:08:29.680
<v Speaker 1>Stay with us. More Bloomberg surveillance coming up after this.

0:08:38.720 --> 0:08:40.880
<v Speaker 2>Oil down this morning by about a half of one

0:08:40.880 --> 0:08:43.640
<v Speaker 2>percent on per and crude oil falling. As the President

0:08:43.679 --> 0:08:46.080
<v Speaker 2>stokes optimism the AROUND war is nearing an end and

0:08:46.120 --> 0:08:49.760
<v Speaker 2>possibly withdrawing before reopening the stratiformers and a world of

0:08:49.760 --> 0:08:52.880
<v Speaker 2>the Atlantic Council noting potential issues with the plan, writing

0:08:52.880 --> 0:08:55.120
<v Speaker 2>this would be a terrible president for the US because

0:08:55.160 --> 0:08:58.240
<v Speaker 2>around it's actually in an enhanced position of making more

0:08:58.280 --> 0:09:01.240
<v Speaker 2>money than before and joins US now for more and

0:09:01.280 --> 0:09:03.400
<v Speaker 2>welcome to the program. The last time we spoke, which

0:09:03.400 --> 0:09:05.880
<v Speaker 2>I believe was about a week ago, you said, unless

0:09:05.880 --> 0:09:08.840
<v Speaker 2>this sends in ten to fourteen days, the energy crisis

0:09:08.840 --> 0:09:11.679
<v Speaker 2>are going to approach severe levels. The President is now

0:09:11.720 --> 0:09:14.440
<v Speaker 2>saying it's going to take another two weeks potentially. And

0:09:14.600 --> 0:09:16.280
<v Speaker 2>with that in mind, what kind of levels are we

0:09:16.320 --> 0:09:18.280
<v Speaker 2>going to approach in the next two weeks.

0:09:19.080 --> 0:09:21.720
<v Speaker 7>Well, if you look at what's happening already in France

0:09:22.600 --> 0:09:25.120
<v Speaker 7>and other countries where they're having runs.

0:09:24.840 --> 0:09:27.080
<v Speaker 8>On gasoline stations, I mean gasoline stations are.

0:09:27.000 --> 0:09:31.080
<v Speaker 7>Running dry because they're putting in these price controls and

0:09:31.120 --> 0:09:35.800
<v Speaker 7>that's making everyone rush to buy. We're really having severe

0:09:35.840 --> 0:09:37.839
<v Speaker 7>issues in a lot of countries that we in the

0:09:37.960 --> 0:09:41.400
<v Speaker 7>US are quite insulated from because we're not experiencing this. Yes,

0:09:41.440 --> 0:09:45.680
<v Speaker 7>we are seeing much higher gasoline prices, but the fact

0:09:45.720 --> 0:09:49.520
<v Speaker 7>that we're not seeing any shortages is really giving us

0:09:49.600 --> 0:09:53.800
<v Speaker 7>this sense of isolation. I think from the most important

0:09:53.800 --> 0:09:55.960
<v Speaker 7>impact of this conflict.

0:09:55.880 --> 0:09:59.280
<v Speaker 6>Ellen, can the straight be reopened or can you see

0:09:59.280 --> 0:10:02.400
<v Speaker 6>a supplies start to flow through there? If Iran continues

0:10:02.440 --> 0:10:05.800
<v Speaker 6>to hold on to a control of this region, And

0:10:05.840 --> 0:10:08.360
<v Speaker 6>I ask this at a time when Cutter is seeing

0:10:08.360 --> 0:10:11.520
<v Speaker 6>oil tankers being bombed in Qatari land.

0:10:12.520 --> 0:10:16.160
<v Speaker 7>This is a really severe problem because if the United

0:10:16.200 --> 0:10:20.719
<v Speaker 7>States ends this conflict or declares an end to it

0:10:21.120 --> 0:10:26.120
<v Speaker 7>while leaving Iran basically a de facto control over passage

0:10:26.160 --> 0:10:29.360
<v Speaker 7>into and out of the Persian Gulf, then we've actually

0:10:29.400 --> 0:10:32.240
<v Speaker 7>put Iran in a much better position than they were

0:10:32.280 --> 0:10:35.319
<v Speaker 7>in before this started, because.

0:10:35.040 --> 0:10:37.800
<v Speaker 8>Now beforehand, they weren't actually controlling it.

0:10:37.800 --> 0:10:41.800
<v Speaker 7>It was just this threat that they might actually limit

0:10:41.840 --> 0:10:45.360
<v Speaker 7>traffic or they might threaten the safety of ships passing through.

0:10:45.520 --> 0:10:47.920
<v Speaker 7>Now they are threatening the safety of ships passing through,

0:10:47.960 --> 0:10:51.440
<v Speaker 7>and it is effective because tankers are refusing to cross

0:10:51.480 --> 0:10:54.480
<v Speaker 7>because of Intera's issues and because they don't want to

0:10:54.480 --> 0:10:56.240
<v Speaker 7>get hit by a drone.

0:10:56.920 --> 0:10:58.679
<v Speaker 8>And then if we leave Iran's.

0:10:58.280 --> 0:11:00.319
<v Speaker 7>Basically in a position to say, well, how how much

0:11:00.320 --> 0:11:00.640
<v Speaker 7>are you.

0:11:00.640 --> 0:11:03.080
<v Speaker 8>Going to pay us to leave you alone?

0:11:03.160 --> 0:11:05.880
<v Speaker 7>And that is that's a whole new role for this

0:11:05.960 --> 0:11:08.800
<v Speaker 7>country and also puts them in the position to make

0:11:08.840 --> 0:11:09.480
<v Speaker 7>more money.

0:11:09.800 --> 0:11:12.200
<v Speaker 5>Well, when it comes to the money ellen in the past,

0:11:12.240 --> 0:11:15.880
<v Speaker 5>anytime the United States offered waivers for Iranian oil, it

0:11:15.920 --> 0:11:18.600
<v Speaker 5>was put into an escrow account, and there was it

0:11:18.640 --> 0:11:21.280
<v Speaker 5>was dictated that it had to be used for humanitarian

0:11:21.360 --> 0:11:24.720
<v Speaker 5>aid for the people of Iran. I didn't see any

0:11:24.760 --> 0:11:27.800
<v Speaker 5>of that sort of language in the general license. So

0:11:28.000 --> 0:11:31.040
<v Speaker 5>where is this money going that the regime is making

0:11:31.120 --> 0:11:33.880
<v Speaker 5>right now off of selling their crude and the toll.

0:11:34.800 --> 0:11:36.679
<v Speaker 8>Presumably it's going straight to Iran.

0:11:37.320 --> 0:11:40.719
<v Speaker 7>It's not going in dollars because there's still restrictions on

0:11:41.320 --> 0:11:42.760
<v Speaker 7>what kind of currency Iran can use.

0:11:42.800 --> 0:11:44.640
<v Speaker 8>But at this point do they really.

0:11:44.400 --> 0:11:47.320
<v Speaker 7>Care whether you know, Pakistan is paying them in yon

0:11:47.520 --> 0:11:47.720
<v Speaker 7>or not.

0:11:48.400 --> 0:11:50.800
<v Speaker 8>It's going straight to the government now.

0:11:51.240 --> 0:11:54.920
<v Speaker 7>Because militarily we've hit certain sites, We've we've hit you know,

0:11:55.000 --> 0:11:56.040
<v Speaker 7>factories where their.

0:11:55.840 --> 0:11:58.640
<v Speaker 8>Making these these missiles and drones.

0:11:58.880 --> 0:12:02.199
<v Speaker 7>They're not necessarily to produce more of it right away,

0:12:02.400 --> 0:12:04.319
<v Speaker 7>but the fact that they that they have this money

0:12:04.320 --> 0:12:06.520
<v Speaker 7>means that they will be able to get back to

0:12:06.600 --> 0:12:08.320
<v Speaker 7>this in the future, or they can funnel it to

0:12:08.360 --> 0:12:09.679
<v Speaker 7>their to their proxies.

0:12:09.720 --> 0:12:12.920
<v Speaker 8>I mean, the Hoothies are still a wild card here that.

0:12:14.240 --> 0:12:18.160
<v Speaker 7>Could completely change the situation in the Red Sea. And

0:12:18.240 --> 0:12:22.400
<v Speaker 7>if they're doing that with Iranian funds, then have we

0:12:22.559 --> 0:12:26.600
<v Speaker 7>really even put you know, anything in this situation in

0:12:26.640 --> 0:12:29.439
<v Speaker 7>a better place? And I would argue that not necessarily.

0:12:29.800 --> 0:12:32.320
<v Speaker 5>I was told once again by a source yesterday that

0:12:32.360 --> 0:12:34.840
<v Speaker 5>the Saudis are basically paying off the Hoothies to not

0:12:34.880 --> 0:12:35.520
<v Speaker 5>get involved.

0:12:35.720 --> 0:12:37.040
<v Speaker 1>At what point does that stop?

0:12:38.240 --> 0:12:41.920
<v Speaker 7>It stops when they have access to the Persian Gulf

0:12:42.080 --> 0:12:45.400
<v Speaker 7>again once they can once they can ship out of

0:12:45.440 --> 0:12:47.280
<v Speaker 7>the Persian Golf, and they don't have a need to

0:12:47.800 --> 0:12:50.720
<v Speaker 7>continue to pay off the Hoothies at maybe such a

0:12:50.760 --> 0:12:51.560
<v Speaker 7>such a high rate.

0:12:52.280 --> 0:12:55.280
<v Speaker 6>Ellen just more broadly, what's Saudi Arabia's role in all

0:12:55.320 --> 0:12:56.960
<v Speaker 6>of this. We've heard from the UA, or at least

0:12:56.960 --> 0:12:59.920
<v Speaker 6>reporting from the Wall Street Journal that they're considering serious

0:13:00.160 --> 0:13:03.360
<v Speaker 6>getting involved in some sort of effort to make the

0:13:03.360 --> 0:13:07.040
<v Speaker 6>straight of war moves independent and a free flow for traffic.

0:13:07.280 --> 0:13:09.680
<v Speaker 6>When does Saudi Arabia get more intensely involved.

0:13:10.679 --> 0:13:13.000
<v Speaker 7>I think they get intensely involved as a member of

0:13:13.040 --> 0:13:13.600
<v Speaker 7>the GCC.

0:13:14.320 --> 0:13:16.320
<v Speaker 8>You know, this is a waterway that they depend on.

0:13:16.400 --> 0:13:19.880
<v Speaker 7>Me. Remember, we've had major, major wars on a much

0:13:20.000 --> 0:13:23.920
<v Speaker 7>larger scale fought simply, you know, for freedom of the seas.

0:13:23.960 --> 0:13:26.360
<v Speaker 7>This was something that that Woodrow Wilson cited when he

0:13:26.400 --> 0:13:27.760
<v Speaker 7>brought the United States into.

0:13:27.600 --> 0:13:28.360
<v Speaker 8>World War One.

0:13:28.679 --> 0:13:31.679
<v Speaker 7>So the idea that Saudi Arabia and the UAE and

0:13:32.320 --> 0:13:36.000
<v Speaker 7>Cutter and Kuwait and Iraq want free passage or a

0:13:36.040 --> 0:13:39.079
<v Speaker 7>freedom of the season and freedom for passage through the

0:13:39.080 --> 0:13:43.840
<v Speaker 7>straight of for moves, that's a very basic right of nations.

0:13:43.960 --> 0:13:47.280
<v Speaker 7>And so I do think that if there's a potential

0:13:47.360 --> 0:13:49.760
<v Speaker 7>for them to make a difference in securing that that

0:13:49.840 --> 0:13:53.400
<v Speaker 7>they will get involved as part of the greater GCC.

0:13:54.440 --> 0:13:57.839
<v Speaker 2>Stay with us Multblemberg Savannah's coming up off to this,

0:14:07.400 --> 0:14:09.720
<v Speaker 2>The first treading day of April could be a long

0:14:10.040 --> 0:14:13.720
<v Speaker 2>treading day. The President addressing the nation later on this evening,

0:14:13.840 --> 0:14:14.040
<v Speaker 2>I was.

0:14:14.040 --> 0:14:16.400
<v Speaker 6>Thinking to myself, how many people were excited, thinking maybe

0:14:16.400 --> 0:14:17.920
<v Speaker 6>this is an April Fools joke, and I don't have

0:14:17.960 --> 0:14:20.520
<v Speaker 6>to stay up until ten or eleven PM to understand

0:14:20.560 --> 0:14:22.520
<v Speaker 6>exactly what the mood for Q two is going to be.

0:14:22.640 --> 0:14:24.800
<v Speaker 5>Well, source called me last night after that news became

0:14:24.840 --> 0:14:27.600
<v Speaker 5>public and said it's going to be the Academy Awards

0:14:27.640 --> 0:14:28.640
<v Speaker 5>of Verbal Intervention.

0:14:29.320 --> 0:14:31.440
<v Speaker 2>What's come a little bit later on this evening, it's

0:14:31.480 --> 0:14:34.080
<v Speaker 2>everyone walked straight this morning, Steve and Uthur federated right

0:14:34.120 --> 0:14:36.040
<v Speaker 2>in the following We are treating this as another brick

0:14:36.040 --> 0:14:38.240
<v Speaker 2>in the wall of worry as the US markets advanced

0:14:38.240 --> 0:14:40.680
<v Speaker 2>toward towards our s and P five hundred target of

0:14:40.720 --> 0:14:44.440
<v Speaker 2>seventy five hundred for twenty twenty six. Steve, John Zusnaphimos, Steve.

0:14:44.280 --> 0:14:45.320
<v Speaker 1>Good morning, good morning.

0:14:45.400 --> 0:14:48.080
<v Speaker 2>Why is this just another brick and a climbable wall

0:14:48.320 --> 0:14:48.840
<v Speaker 2>of worry?

0:14:50.160 --> 0:14:52.320
<v Speaker 9>Well, we have an expression at federating hermies.

0:14:52.320 --> 0:14:55.600
<v Speaker 10>You know, if it can't happen, it won't and I

0:14:55.600 --> 0:14:59.040
<v Speaker 10>think you know the alternative really can't happen, and you're

0:14:59.040 --> 0:15:06.080
<v Speaker 10>seeing her, you stepping in here. We can't have twenty million, okay.

0:15:05.840 --> 0:15:08.200
<v Speaker 9>Eleven million barrels a day. I guess if they can.

0:15:08.200 --> 0:15:11.920
<v Speaker 10>Keep the Red Sea open of the world's oil supply,

0:15:11.960 --> 0:15:17.560
<v Speaker 10>which is eleven percent unavailable, that just takes oil, you know, roughly,

0:15:17.920 --> 0:15:19.880
<v Speaker 10>I think, as you guys know, it's about ten bucks

0:15:19.880 --> 0:15:23.360
<v Speaker 10>a barrel. So you're looking at a number in the

0:15:23.360 --> 0:15:28.640
<v Speaker 10>one fifties that would kill the global economy. So we

0:15:28.760 --> 0:15:34.280
<v Speaker 10>have a fifteen percent probability that that's what happens. So

0:15:34.360 --> 0:15:37.000
<v Speaker 10>that's why we're sort of suddenly cautioned here. We have

0:15:37.080 --> 0:15:41.000
<v Speaker 10>not added to equities. We're keeping our forecast in place

0:15:41.040 --> 0:15:45.760
<v Speaker 10>at the moment, but every week that goes by, you know,

0:15:45.760 --> 0:15:48.280
<v Speaker 10>we get closer to the summer driving season. I think

0:15:48.320 --> 0:15:53.200
<v Speaker 10>you know that the gasoline output, you know, they have

0:15:53.240 --> 0:15:56.040
<v Speaker 10>to store it in advance. They can't produce enough to

0:15:56.120 --> 0:16:01.160
<v Speaker 10>meet demand during the summer season. So yeah, crack spreads

0:16:01.800 --> 0:16:04.480
<v Speaker 10>are closing in on twenty dollars on top of the

0:16:04.480 --> 0:16:07.360
<v Speaker 10>oil price. You know, that gets you two levels That

0:16:08.000 --> 0:16:13.040
<v Speaker 10>often results in a demand response. So a few more

0:16:13.040 --> 0:16:15.480
<v Speaker 10>weeks of this, you know, we're going to have to

0:16:15.520 --> 0:16:17.400
<v Speaker 10>take down our GDP forecast.

0:16:17.960 --> 0:16:19.960
<v Speaker 1>Just tell you it's going to be a fewal weeks.

0:16:20.400 --> 0:16:23.000
<v Speaker 9>I think that's why he's looking at those number of weeks.

0:16:23.240 --> 0:16:25.480
<v Speaker 10>I think they're doing the math on this, so they

0:16:25.520 --> 0:16:27.360
<v Speaker 10>really do have to figure out a way to get

0:16:27.360 --> 0:16:31.240
<v Speaker 10>this over in a couple more weeks or people are

0:16:31.240 --> 0:16:34.520
<v Speaker 10>going to start taking down their GDP forecasts. We you know,

0:16:34.560 --> 0:16:38.200
<v Speaker 10>we entered into this with GDP ahead of consensus. We're

0:16:38.240 --> 0:16:40.280
<v Speaker 10>at four percent for this year because of all the

0:16:40.280 --> 0:16:42.680
<v Speaker 10>stuff that's going on with the one big beautiful bill

0:16:42.760 --> 0:16:45.280
<v Speaker 10>and you know, the stuff people have talked about, and

0:16:45.400 --> 0:16:47.040
<v Speaker 10>the underlying earnings pretty good.

0:16:47.040 --> 0:16:48.080
<v Speaker 9>Investments are pretty good.

0:16:48.120 --> 0:16:53.400
<v Speaker 10>So fortunately we're entering into this with strong number. So

0:16:53.560 --> 0:16:56.400
<v Speaker 10>this doesn't yet put us into a recession scenario. It's

0:16:56.440 --> 0:17:01.160
<v Speaker 10>more like lower growth than we're anticipating. I'm also looking

0:17:01.240 --> 0:17:04.960
<v Speaker 10>very carefully now. We've got earning season coming up in

0:17:05.000 --> 0:17:09.040
<v Speaker 10>another ten days or so, and you know it's going

0:17:09.119 --> 0:17:11.520
<v Speaker 10>to be great. We know that coming into the thing.

0:17:11.600 --> 0:17:14.159
<v Speaker 10>But the question is is this going to be like

0:17:14.200 --> 0:17:16.760
<v Speaker 10>the weather. You know, everyone's going to be talking about

0:17:16.760 --> 0:17:21.840
<v Speaker 10>the weather here, which is the Mid East, and guidance

0:17:21.920 --> 0:17:24.879
<v Speaker 10>might be more conservative, and that's probably not good for

0:17:24.920 --> 0:17:25.640
<v Speaker 10>the market either.

0:17:25.720 --> 0:17:27.000
<v Speaker 1>So there are a lot of unknowns.

0:17:27.119 --> 0:17:29.439
<v Speaker 6>There are no unknowns, so then they're unknown unknowns and

0:17:29.480 --> 0:17:32.320
<v Speaker 6>it's just a really muddy moment and everyone's really frustrated.

0:17:32.359 --> 0:17:34.360
<v Speaker 6>Which when analyst came in yesterday and said, it gives

0:17:34.400 --> 0:17:35.720
<v Speaker 6>me a lot of time to take a step back

0:17:35.760 --> 0:17:37.879
<v Speaker 6>and have big thoughts. So I'm curious for you to

0:17:37.920 --> 0:17:41.600
<v Speaker 6>have big thoughts to understand how structurally the market has changed.

0:17:41.960 --> 0:17:44.800
<v Speaker 6>Even if say this is a short conflict, there will

0:17:44.800 --> 0:17:47.840
<v Speaker 6>be an inflationary read through, and if the economy is strong,

0:17:47.880 --> 0:17:50.080
<v Speaker 6>even more so. And right now it seems like we're

0:17:50.080 --> 0:17:53.400
<v Speaker 6>pushing up against the limits of both fiscal borrowing as

0:17:53.440 --> 0:17:55.920
<v Speaker 6>well as just how much the FED can stimulate or

0:17:55.960 --> 0:17:58.520
<v Speaker 6>monetary policy makers can really stimulate. On the other end,

0:17:59.160 --> 0:18:01.119
<v Speaker 6>how much do rates at four and a half to

0:18:01.160 --> 0:18:04.000
<v Speaker 6>five percent in the United States maturely change the outlook

0:18:04.040 --> 0:18:06.440
<v Speaker 6>for US equities going forward if they're not going to

0:18:06.520 --> 0:18:08.120
<v Speaker 6>come down all that much, and if it's the same

0:18:08.160 --> 0:18:08.800
<v Speaker 6>around the world.

0:18:08.960 --> 0:18:12.480
<v Speaker 10>Okay, so we tend Lisa, you know, we're trying to

0:18:12.480 --> 0:18:15.480
<v Speaker 10>invest against a three here horizon. So we're looking out

0:18:15.840 --> 0:18:18.359
<v Speaker 10>past this and saying what world are we going to be?

0:18:18.400 --> 0:18:20.399
<v Speaker 10>And we should be back to a world that's growing

0:18:20.480 --> 0:18:24.160
<v Speaker 10>reasonably well, all those drivers we've talked about, the AI revolution,

0:18:24.240 --> 0:18:27.239
<v Speaker 10>et cetera, and a market that is significantly cheaper than

0:18:27.320 --> 0:18:31.600
<v Speaker 10>it was three months ago. So on that view, we'll

0:18:31.600 --> 0:18:34.320
<v Speaker 10>come through this. The question is in the meantime, how

0:18:34.320 --> 0:18:37.520
<v Speaker 10>do you navigate your way there? And as I said,

0:18:37.560 --> 0:18:40.159
<v Speaker 10>if this goes on longer, I'm more worried about the

0:18:40.200 --> 0:18:43.520
<v Speaker 10>demand impact. You're more worried about the inflation impact. But

0:18:43.680 --> 0:18:45.840
<v Speaker 10>I would say four and a half is another Magano

0:18:46.040 --> 0:18:49.720
<v Speaker 10>line for the Trump administration. We saw that back in

0:18:49.800 --> 0:18:53.720
<v Speaker 10>April of last year. We got close to it again

0:18:54.000 --> 0:18:57.000
<v Speaker 10>just recently. We're not backed down quite a bit now.

0:18:57.040 --> 0:18:59.600
<v Speaker 10>But yeah, I mean four and a half is not

0:18:59.640 --> 0:19:00.120
<v Speaker 10>a good.

0:19:00.480 --> 0:19:04.080
<v Speaker 6>Can you have both not necessarily downside surprise if you

0:19:04.119 --> 0:19:06.040
<v Speaker 6>do have some sort of ends to this and companies

0:19:06.080 --> 0:19:09.200
<v Speaker 6>can maneuver through it, and then also get the disinflationary

0:19:09.280 --> 0:19:11.120
<v Speaker 6>pull through that a lot of people are expecting later

0:19:11.160 --> 0:19:12.600
<v Speaker 6>this year. I mean, do you have to have one

0:19:12.600 --> 0:19:15.280
<v Speaker 6>of the other, either a downturn and growth or stick

0:19:15.320 --> 0:19:17.520
<v Speaker 6>your inflation and central banks are not going to be

0:19:17.560 --> 0:19:19.719
<v Speaker 6>cutting rates that potentially could pressure valuations.

0:19:19.760 --> 0:19:21.439
<v Speaker 10>Well, I don't think the inflation is going to be

0:19:21.480 --> 0:19:24.679
<v Speaker 10>stickier if they really do get this done in the

0:19:24.720 --> 0:19:27.880
<v Speaker 10>next few weeks and get the straits reopened, right, because

0:19:28.119 --> 0:19:31.199
<v Speaker 10>people are not going to factor in those higher prices forever,

0:19:31.240 --> 0:19:34.480
<v Speaker 10>which is what you need to be stickier. So I'm

0:19:34.520 --> 0:19:37.040
<v Speaker 10>still not on the sticky inflat. I'm more worried about

0:19:37.480 --> 0:19:41.480
<v Speaker 10>the summer driving season, the demand impact. They're going to

0:19:41.600 --> 0:19:44.919
<v Speaker 10>figure out a way, whether it's Trump declaring victory, but

0:19:45.040 --> 0:19:47.560
<v Speaker 10>the Iranians, what are they going to do? The only

0:19:47.600 --> 0:19:49.400
<v Speaker 10>thing they've got left is the straight of forem moves.

0:19:49.440 --> 0:19:51.720
<v Speaker 5>So the markets, though, can you declare victory and still

0:19:51.720 --> 0:19:53.680
<v Speaker 5>have the Iranians in control of the strait of removes

0:19:53.720 --> 0:19:54.960
<v Speaker 5>and not have normal traffic?

0:19:55.080 --> 0:19:58.160
<v Speaker 10>I think that's going to be very difficult, right, That's

0:19:58.200 --> 0:20:01.440
<v Speaker 10>going to be the issue. So it's a two way negotiation.

0:20:02.840 --> 0:20:05.000
<v Speaker 10>The you know, the market right now is like a

0:20:05.119 --> 0:20:08.800
<v Speaker 10>multi dimensional chess board with some very smart players in it.

0:20:08.840 --> 0:20:12.200
<v Speaker 10>And so I think when I play that kind of chess,

0:20:12.200 --> 0:20:14.320
<v Speaker 10>I've got a board at my home if anyone wants

0:20:14.359 --> 0:20:19.520
<v Speaker 10>to try it. The thing that the thing that makes

0:20:19.560 --> 0:20:22.879
<v Speaker 10>me most difficult for me when I was younger and

0:20:23.000 --> 0:20:24.840
<v Speaker 10>used to pay my sons were younger and a little

0:20:24.880 --> 0:20:30.920
<v Speaker 10>bit crazier, is an unorthodox player that you can't predict

0:20:31.200 --> 0:20:32.159
<v Speaker 10>that's on the board.

0:20:32.320 --> 0:20:34.800
<v Speaker 2>If I think dying is winning, you're dating with an

0:20:34.920 --> 0:20:36.400
<v Speaker 2>unorthodox player, that's for sure.

0:20:36.600 --> 0:20:40.080
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, And that's what makes this so difficult for everybody,

0:20:40.160 --> 0:20:44.720
<v Speaker 10>because we've got an unorthodox player here who's playing for

0:20:44.800 --> 0:20:51.639
<v Speaker 10>different things. You know, economics is not necessarily their their driver.

0:20:51.640 --> 0:20:52.520
<v Speaker 1>Te pot steel question.

0:20:52.600 --> 0:20:55.280
<v Speaker 2>By the way, the first pot was is the market

0:20:55.320 --> 0:20:57.440
<v Speaker 2>is going to be okay with around controlling the stratiful

0:20:57.520 --> 0:21:00.399
<v Speaker 2>mus And the second pot was with restricted energy For

0:21:00.440 --> 0:21:01.760
<v Speaker 2>the first part the short term, I don't think the

0:21:01.800 --> 0:21:03.680
<v Speaker 2>market will care who's in control of the stratophormus along

0:21:03.680 --> 0:21:06.320
<v Speaker 2>as the energy is flowing. The most important part is

0:21:06.640 --> 0:21:08.960
<v Speaker 2>whether the energy is flowing, and right now it's not flowing.

0:21:09.119 --> 0:21:12.320
<v Speaker 2>There's just a hope that the President moves on Ironte's

0:21:12.359 --> 0:21:15.440
<v Speaker 2>control in the near term maybe and then the energy

0:21:15.440 --> 0:21:17.320
<v Speaker 2>starts flowing again, they'll charge people for it. I don't

0:21:17.359 --> 0:21:18.560
<v Speaker 2>think in the near term the market is going to

0:21:18.600 --> 0:21:20.280
<v Speaker 2>care about that. Over the longer term, that will have

0:21:20.359 --> 0:21:22.240
<v Speaker 2>consequences for the kind of premium that will be put

0:21:22.240 --> 0:21:25.000
<v Speaker 2>on crude coming through the stratiform mods, the risk around that.

0:21:25.040 --> 0:21:27.040
<v Speaker 2>But in the near term, this market has been itching

0:21:27.080 --> 0:21:27.439
<v Speaker 2>to move on.

0:21:27.560 --> 0:21:31.600
<v Speaker 10>Now the longer term outlook for oil has gone higher

0:21:31.640 --> 0:21:32.800
<v Speaker 10>regardless because of that.

0:21:32.800 --> 0:21:34.400
<v Speaker 1>Job, which is why they said was trading at eight.

0:21:34.640 --> 0:21:37.120
<v Speaker 10>And you know what we're looking at is a demand

0:21:37.200 --> 0:21:39.879
<v Speaker 10>impact here of people saying I got to have a

0:21:40.600 --> 0:21:44.920
<v Speaker 10>bigger reserve to avoid this, and longer term, this is

0:21:44.960 --> 0:21:47.280
<v Speaker 10>probably really good for nuclear energy companies.

0:21:47.560 --> 0:21:48.560
<v Speaker 1>That's the structural shift.

0:21:48.560 --> 0:21:52.680
<v Speaker 2>Just one final question, tech multiples, real multiple contration through

0:21:52.720 --> 0:21:55.560
<v Speaker 2>the last month or so, is that compression and opportunity

0:21:55.720 --> 0:21:57.680
<v Speaker 2>or does that speak to the structural shift we're seeing

0:21:57.680 --> 0:22:00.280
<v Speaker 2>and how we value this s equity market.

0:21:59.800 --> 0:22:02.919
<v Speaker 10>Think, you know, as you know what before just the

0:22:03.000 --> 0:22:05.760
<v Speaker 10>day before this started, we took down our target for

0:22:05.800 --> 0:22:08.560
<v Speaker 10>the year and we took down the tech multiples because

0:22:09.000 --> 0:22:12.920
<v Speaker 10>we saw the big megacaps going from big free cash

0:22:12.960 --> 0:22:15.680
<v Speaker 10>flow generators to in the near term, not being big

0:22:15.720 --> 0:22:16.880
<v Speaker 10>free cash flow generators.

0:22:16.920 --> 0:22:18.520
<v Speaker 9>And we don't know how long that's going to go

0:22:18.600 --> 0:22:18.879
<v Speaker 9>on for.

0:22:19.080 --> 0:22:23.520
<v Speaker 10>So we've kind of switched our portfolios, fortunately towards hard

0:22:23.560 --> 0:22:28.560
<v Speaker 10>asset companies, you know, more value intensive. And I think

0:22:28.760 --> 0:22:31.359
<v Speaker 10>once you come out of this, you're still faced with

0:22:31.440 --> 0:22:34.680
<v Speaker 10>that problem, the AI disruption on the software side of tech,

0:22:35.280 --> 0:22:38.680
<v Speaker 10>and you know, the free cash flow decline. That's why

0:22:38.880 --> 0:22:42.920
<v Speaker 10>companies that are growing free cash flow right now tend

0:22:43.000 --> 0:22:45.359
<v Speaker 10>to be on the old economy side of the of

0:22:45.440 --> 0:22:48.680
<v Speaker 10>the kind of like Chevron. I mean, they're scree cash

0:22:48.680 --> 0:22:52.280
<v Speaker 10>flows ballooning Micron by the way, free cash flow and

0:22:52.280 --> 0:22:55.800
<v Speaker 10>that stock you know, down significantly here down thirty percent,

0:22:55.880 --> 0:22:57.919
<v Speaker 10>but their free cash flow is going to go up

0:22:57.960 --> 0:22:59.760
<v Speaker 10>by eight times over the next couple of years.

0:22:59.800 --> 0:23:01.760
<v Speaker 9>So I think that's where the market is going to

0:23:01.880 --> 0:23:02.600
<v Speaker 9>end up going to.

0:23:06.000 --> 0:23:09.000
<v Speaker 10>You know, the tech is okay, you're the price I

0:23:09.040 --> 0:23:12.119
<v Speaker 10>think has already kind of corrected, but yeah, I'm not

0:23:12.119 --> 0:23:14.560
<v Speaker 10>sure it can lead us out of this.

0:23:14.560 --> 0:23:18.119
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Survanans podcast, bringing you the best

0:23:18.119 --> 0:23:21.200
<v Speaker 2>in markets, economics, an gier politics. You can watch the

0:23:21.240 --> 0:23:24.240
<v Speaker 2>show live on Bloomberg TV weekday mornings from six am

0:23:24.359 --> 0:23:27.520
<v Speaker 2>to nine am Eastern. Subscribe to the podcast on Apple,

0:23:27.800 --> 0:23:30.639
<v Speaker 2>Spotify or anywhere else you listen, and as always, on

0:23:30.680 --> 0:23:33.160
<v Speaker 2>the Bloomberg Terminal and the Bloomberg Business app.