WEBVTT - Best Of - Is LeBron James sending Lakers a WARNING? Patrick Mahomes still owns Allen, Lamar & Burrow

0:00:00.280 --> 0:00:02.480
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the best of the week for What's Right

0:00:02.560 --> 0:00:05.200
<v Speaker 1>with Nick Right the best takes and moments from this

0:00:05.280 --> 0:00:09.920
<v Speaker 1>week on the show Enjoy Soul.

0:00:10.000 --> 0:00:13.000
<v Speaker 2>Lebron opted into his fifty two million dollar contract, and

0:00:13.039 --> 0:00:16.159
<v Speaker 2>then came the trade rumors. Rich Paul came out with

0:00:16.200 --> 0:00:18.800
<v Speaker 2>a statement and said, Lebron knows the Lakers are building

0:00:18.800 --> 0:00:21.599
<v Speaker 2>for the future. He understands that, but he values a

0:00:21.640 --> 0:00:24.600
<v Speaker 2>realistic chance of winning it all. You thought they were

0:00:24.600 --> 0:00:26.920
<v Speaker 2>going to come away with a sinner. They ended up

0:00:26.960 --> 0:00:29.520
<v Speaker 2>hitting DeAndre Hayton, who was a sinner. Yeah, but something

0:00:29.520 --> 0:00:31.000
<v Speaker 2>about this whole process.

0:00:30.640 --> 0:00:32.600
<v Speaker 1>Has been peeing you off. Do you care to share

0:00:33.040 --> 0:00:38.840
<v Speaker 1>with the Audien? Yes? So, I have just been mystified

0:00:40.320 --> 0:00:54.720
<v Speaker 1>at the combination of misinformation, disingenuous commentary, and almost huffing

0:00:54.760 --> 0:00:59.600
<v Speaker 1>and puffing from the media, Like, ah, I guess we're

0:00:59.760 --> 0:01:04.000
<v Speaker 1>four first to talk about Lebron again. What the fuck

0:01:04.080 --> 0:01:07.640
<v Speaker 1>else has happened in free agency? The Kevin Durant trade

0:01:07.920 --> 0:01:10.880
<v Speaker 1>that all of us knew was coming, that we that

0:01:11.160 --> 0:01:14.280
<v Speaker 1>we talked about. That that was awesome, that was exciting.

0:01:14.760 --> 0:01:19.520
<v Speaker 1>Other than that, it's been the deadest free agent agency imaginable.

0:01:19.920 --> 0:01:22.959
<v Speaker 1>One team at cap space. It was the nets. They

0:01:23.000 --> 0:01:26.200
<v Speaker 1>they decided to use it just to take other teams

0:01:26.280 --> 0:01:30.600
<v Speaker 1>bad contracts. Sham's was telling us a month ago this

0:01:30.640 --> 0:01:35.840
<v Speaker 1>could be the craziest offseason ever. Nothing's happened other than

0:01:35.880 --> 0:01:39.240
<v Speaker 1>the Durant move. The most notable move is Norman Powell

0:01:39.760 --> 0:01:43.600
<v Speaker 1>getting traded to Miami. Norman Powell, who, by the way,

0:01:43.760 --> 0:01:47.800
<v Speaker 1>oddly enough, the only time Norman Powell's been discussed on

0:01:49.520 --> 0:01:54.200
<v Speaker 1>regularly on podcasts and TV shows aside from once focused

0:01:54.200 --> 0:01:56.840
<v Speaker 1>on the Clippers was a different Lebron James thing when

0:01:56.840 --> 0:01:59.720
<v Speaker 1>people were like, oh, what did anyone think of Norman

0:01:59.760 --> 0:02:03.320
<v Speaker 1>Powe and his all Star spot? If Lebron knew he

0:02:03.400 --> 0:02:07.320
<v Speaker 1>wasn't gonna play and so but but I'm listening to

0:02:08.000 --> 0:02:14.040
<v Speaker 1>and reading folks basically be like, all right, I guess

0:02:14.600 --> 0:02:19.960
<v Speaker 1>will feed the content and engagement monster and have the boring,

0:02:20.160 --> 0:02:27.000
<v Speaker 1>tired discussion of could Lebron James be traded? You mean

0:02:27.040 --> 0:02:30.240
<v Speaker 1>the greatest player of all time? Or you know what?

0:02:30.400 --> 0:02:33.520
<v Speaker 1>Do not argue with, folks, the at worst second greatest

0:02:33.520 --> 0:02:37.320
<v Speaker 1>player of all time who's never been traded, who is

0:02:37.480 --> 0:02:42.160
<v Speaker 1>open now potentially to being traded. That's a boring discussion.

0:02:43.200 --> 0:02:48.760
<v Speaker 1>We'd rather talk about the Pacers losing Miles Turner because

0:02:48.800 --> 0:02:51.600
<v Speaker 1>they don't want to pay the tax because Halliburton got hurt.

0:02:52.320 --> 0:02:54.919
<v Speaker 1>That's what we'd rather talk about, Cam Whitmore for two

0:02:55.000 --> 0:02:59.440
<v Speaker 1>second round picks, Like what are we doing? This is

0:02:59.480 --> 0:03:02.280
<v Speaker 1>and it's not lost on me today, this very moment

0:03:03.000 --> 0:03:07.280
<v Speaker 1>is the fifteen year anniversary. I didn't know that until

0:03:07.280 --> 0:03:10.800
<v Speaker 1>I saw an article wading about it this morning. Today's

0:03:10.800 --> 0:03:15.920
<v Speaker 1>the fifteen year anniversary of the decision, which means we've

0:03:15.919 --> 0:03:24.440
<v Speaker 1>had fifteen years of enhanced more, round the clock, more,

0:03:24.600 --> 0:03:27.519
<v Speaker 1>twelve month a year, three hundred and sixty five day

0:03:28.320 --> 0:03:34.360
<v Speaker 1>NBA transaction interest, from player empowerment, to the owners trying

0:03:34.360 --> 0:03:39.240
<v Speaker 1>to rustle it back, super Team's homegrown, all of it.

0:03:39.240 --> 0:03:43.680
<v Speaker 1>It came because Lebron and Maverick put together a TV

0:03:43.800 --> 0:03:47.280
<v Speaker 1>show and changed the whole paradigm. And fifteen years later,

0:03:49.120 --> 0:03:53.560
<v Speaker 1>he's still one of, if not the most interesting person

0:03:53.600 --> 0:03:56.760
<v Speaker 1>in the league, and folks who cover the league for

0:03:56.840 --> 0:04:02.040
<v Speaker 1>a living seem almost resentful that this is a story.

0:04:02.840 --> 0:04:05.480
<v Speaker 1>So I don't understand that. But that's I guess a

0:04:05.520 --> 0:04:09.320
<v Speaker 1>matter of taste. That's a personal preference, so be it.

0:04:10.000 --> 0:04:16.839
<v Speaker 1>But then there is what I considered the outright misinformation

0:04:17.040 --> 0:04:20.560
<v Speaker 1>might be too strong, especially in today's climate, but just

0:04:21.080 --> 0:04:30.560
<v Speaker 1>misleading and incorrect. I guess opinions on Lebron's money and

0:04:30.680 --> 0:04:37.520
<v Speaker 1>Lebron's value and Lebron's impact on winning, because here's what

0:04:37.760 --> 0:04:43.360
<v Speaker 1>I know. Last year we played, we had an offseason.

0:04:43.400 --> 0:04:47.359
<v Speaker 1>By the way, we're in the Olympics. They had a

0:04:47.400 --> 0:04:50.560
<v Speaker 1>whole All the best players in the world came together

0:04:50.640 --> 0:04:54.000
<v Speaker 1>in Paris to play a basketball tournament, and then they

0:04:54.120 --> 0:04:57.400
<v Speaker 1>voted on who was the most Valuable player in that tournament,

0:04:57.680 --> 0:05:00.760
<v Speaker 1>and it was Lebron James. Now, I argue you could

0:05:00.800 --> 0:05:04.280
<v Speaker 1>have gone co MVPs because Lebron carried the team up

0:05:04.400 --> 0:05:07.440
<v Speaker 1>until the final, and then Steph was so utterly brilliant

0:05:07.640 --> 0:05:09.919
<v Speaker 1>in the semifinal and the final. If you want to

0:05:09.920 --> 0:05:13.000
<v Speaker 1>split the baby, so be it. That's fine. But he

0:05:13.120 --> 0:05:16.120
<v Speaker 1>won the MVP of that. Then this year, we had

0:05:16.120 --> 0:05:21.960
<v Speaker 1>a whole NBA season, and then the entirety of basketball

0:05:22.040 --> 0:05:26.160
<v Speaker 1>media voted on awards, and after this season, if your

0:05:26.320 --> 0:05:32.160
<v Speaker 1>name was not Shay Gilgess, Alexander nikola Jokic, Giannis Antena Koumpo,

0:05:32.600 --> 0:05:36.680
<v Speaker 1>Jason Tatum, or Donovan Mitchell, basketball media said you were

0:05:36.680 --> 0:05:40.000
<v Speaker 1>not as valuable as Lebron James. Those are the five

0:05:40.080 --> 0:05:43.280
<v Speaker 1>guys that finished higher on MVP voting. Those are the

0:05:43.400 --> 0:05:46.880
<v Speaker 1>five guys who received more First Team All NBA votes.

0:05:47.240 --> 0:05:53.000
<v Speaker 1>That's the entire list, Not Steph, not Kawhi, not Durant,

0:05:53.440 --> 0:05:57.559
<v Speaker 1>not who's the younger guys that I'm leaving out, not Kid,

0:05:58.320 --> 0:06:03.680
<v Speaker 1>not Halliburton in the regular season. He obviously came on

0:06:03.800 --> 0:06:09.720
<v Speaker 1>huge in the postseason. None of those guys we had

0:06:09.760 --> 0:06:13.320
<v Speaker 1>an awards. We had a season sixth most First Team

0:06:13.320 --> 0:06:17.760
<v Speaker 1>All NBA votes, sixth most, sixth in the MVP voting.

0:06:19.440 --> 0:06:23.719
<v Speaker 1>And the reason I bring that up is then the

0:06:23.760 --> 0:06:30.000
<v Speaker 1>discussion around Lebron James being the thirteenth highest paid player was, well,

0:06:31.440 --> 0:06:36.640
<v Speaker 1>doesn't Lebron understand that a huge impediment to winning is

0:06:36.680 --> 0:06:41.800
<v Speaker 1>his salary? In what world? In what world is the

0:06:41.920 --> 0:06:46.680
<v Speaker 1>league's I don't know all be conservative eighth best player

0:06:47.400 --> 0:06:53.080
<v Speaker 1>being the thirteenth highest paid player an impediment to winning.

0:06:54.600 --> 0:07:01.200
<v Speaker 1>We just saw the Golden State Warriors trade for and

0:07:01.279 --> 0:07:05.320
<v Speaker 1>then extend Jimmy Butler, and the narrative surrounding that is

0:07:05.600 --> 0:07:11.520
<v Speaker 1>that open steps championship window. Jimmy Butler makes more money

0:07:11.560 --> 0:07:18.280
<v Speaker 1>than Lebron and is worse than Lebron. They say it again,

0:07:18.720 --> 0:07:21.320
<v Speaker 1>but no, I'm talking about the right now, the right now,

0:07:21.400 --> 0:07:25.200
<v Speaker 1>because by the way, I would bet Lebron's got as

0:07:25.200 --> 0:07:29.320
<v Speaker 1>many all NBA caliber seasons, more All NBA caliber seasons

0:07:29.400 --> 0:07:32.240
<v Speaker 1>left in him than Jimmy Butler does. Jimmy Butler's done

0:07:32.320 --> 0:07:36.040
<v Speaker 1>being an All NBA player. Lebron was last year, and

0:07:36.120 --> 0:07:39.600
<v Speaker 1>Steph and Lebron probably have about the same amount of

0:07:39.640 --> 0:07:42.120
<v Speaker 1>seasons left, give or take. And I'm talking about the

0:07:42.160 --> 0:07:48.360
<v Speaker 1>here and the now. People thought that the Warriors made

0:07:48.360 --> 0:07:54.000
<v Speaker 1>a great move giving Jimmy Butler that money, and it's

0:07:54.120 --> 0:07:57.679
<v Speaker 1>a touch more than Lebron makes, and he's a worse player,

0:07:58.160 --> 0:08:04.160
<v Speaker 1>great player, but a worst player. He like, in what

0:08:04.400 --> 0:08:09.080
<v Speaker 1>universe is Lebron James making less than Karl Anthony Towns

0:08:09.360 --> 0:08:15.520
<v Speaker 1>and the same as Paul George a bad contract, not

0:08:15.600 --> 0:08:18.320
<v Speaker 1>a world where he was second team All NBA and

0:08:18.440 --> 0:08:22.440
<v Speaker 1>sixth in MVP voting. So there's that piece of it

0:08:22.960 --> 0:08:25.040
<v Speaker 1>that if you're the seventh or eighth best player in

0:08:25.080 --> 0:08:28.880
<v Speaker 1>the sport and you're the thirteenth highest paid player in

0:08:28.920 --> 0:08:34.600
<v Speaker 1>the sport, you're on a bargain contract, then there was

0:08:34.640 --> 0:08:38.280
<v Speaker 1>this piece of it, Well, if he was really focused

0:08:38.280 --> 0:08:43.559
<v Speaker 1>on winning, he should have taken less to help the Lakers.

0:08:44.040 --> 0:08:49.680
<v Speaker 1>And that was that is a understandable opinion by fans

0:08:50.840 --> 0:08:57.320
<v Speaker 1>and a just abhorrent job by the media in perpetuating

0:08:57.360 --> 0:09:03.440
<v Speaker 1>that because Ron James, if he had cut his salary

0:09:03.480 --> 0:09:06.520
<v Speaker 1>demons from fifty if he had opted out of the

0:09:06.520 --> 0:09:10.040
<v Speaker 1>fifty two and said, you know what, I'll play for twiny,

0:09:10.960 --> 0:09:12.679
<v Speaker 1>you know how much cap space that opens up for

0:09:12.720 --> 0:09:18.079
<v Speaker 1>the Los Angeles Lakers zero dollars, not a penny, because

0:09:18.080 --> 0:09:22.480
<v Speaker 1>they're that far over the cap already. If Lebron James

0:09:22.480 --> 0:09:28.040
<v Speaker 1>had said I'll go from fifty two million to the

0:09:28.160 --> 0:09:33.680
<v Speaker 1>league minimum, it would have opened up roughly ten million

0:09:33.720 --> 0:09:37.120
<v Speaker 1>dollars in cap space for the Lakers. Ten million bucks.

0:09:38.240 --> 0:09:42.720
<v Speaker 1>So this idea that the Lakers could have been these

0:09:42.840 --> 0:09:46.959
<v Speaker 1>major players in free agency if Lebron had simply taken

0:09:47.000 --> 0:09:52.440
<v Speaker 1>a discount is belied by just the facts. And it's

0:09:52.480 --> 0:09:58.400
<v Speaker 1>also it's also, and we all know this is true,

0:09:58.559 --> 0:10:03.000
<v Speaker 1>a disingenuous to discussion because had Lebron, let's say Lebron

0:10:03.200 --> 0:10:06.960
<v Speaker 1>opted out and said, I'm going to be a free

0:10:06.960 --> 0:10:11.680
<v Speaker 1>agent and guess what, guys, I'm going to play for

0:10:11.720 --> 0:10:18.160
<v Speaker 1>the minimum, the entire conversation would be about stacking the deck, unfair,

0:10:18.800 --> 0:10:25.400
<v Speaker 1>faking like that. So there was him simply saying, I

0:10:25.400 --> 0:10:28.520
<v Speaker 1>don't know, I'm the thirteenth ice paid guy in the league.

0:10:28.559 --> 0:10:32.239
<v Speaker 1>I'm probably pretty underpaid. And that's even before you consider

0:10:32.559 --> 0:10:36.000
<v Speaker 1>all of the off court stuff that I bring to

0:10:36.040 --> 0:10:39.640
<v Speaker 1>the table. So yeah, I'll just play for my fifty

0:10:39.679 --> 0:10:44.000
<v Speaker 1>million is more than totally reasonable? Was there?

0:10:44.160 --> 0:10:47.360
<v Speaker 2>Like, so you have to but he opted into the contract,

0:10:47.440 --> 0:10:49.760
<v Speaker 2>Like what would his other options have been?

0:10:50.640 --> 0:10:52.400
<v Speaker 1>He could have opted out and been a free agent.

0:10:53.120 --> 0:10:54.960
<v Speaker 1>He could have opted out and been a free agent

0:10:55.679 --> 0:11:00.520
<v Speaker 1>and signed anywhere for the literally any where for the

0:11:00.600 --> 0:11:05.080
<v Speaker 1>league minimum and leave fifty million on the table or

0:11:05.280 --> 0:11:08.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot of places for the mid level, which is

0:11:08.960 --> 0:11:13.320
<v Speaker 1>about fourteen million bucks. And the only team that could

0:11:13.320 --> 0:11:16.720
<v Speaker 1>have signed him for more than fourteen million dollars would

0:11:16.760 --> 0:11:18.520
<v Speaker 1>have been the Nets, which would have made no sense.

0:11:18.840 --> 0:11:21.520
<v Speaker 1>So those were go ahead? And why did he not

0:11:21.600 --> 0:11:21.840
<v Speaker 1>do that?

0:11:21.960 --> 0:11:23.760
<v Speaker 2>Are you saying, like because he thought the Lakers were

0:11:23.760 --> 0:11:25.840
<v Speaker 2>going to do a better job with secure in a

0:11:25.880 --> 0:11:26.320
<v Speaker 2>better SAE.

0:11:26.360 --> 0:11:32.400
<v Speaker 1>Well, yeah, I mean I think it's a I don't

0:11:32.480 --> 0:11:35.880
<v Speaker 1>think there is a perfect solution here for you know what,

0:11:36.080 --> 0:11:38.360
<v Speaker 1>they're trying to accomplish all these things. And I'm a

0:11:38.440 --> 0:11:43.320
<v Speaker 1>big believer of you can't have everything you want in life,

0:11:43.600 --> 0:11:46.320
<v Speaker 1>and sometimes, like you, you know, you have to make

0:11:46.400 --> 0:11:52.480
<v Speaker 1>trade offs. I'm not sitting here arguing that the Lakers

0:11:52.679 --> 0:11:57.480
<v Speaker 1>owe him something more than they owe Luca, which is

0:11:58.679 --> 0:12:01.360
<v Speaker 1>to try to win a damn chancepion chip this season.

0:12:01.559 --> 0:12:02.959
<v Speaker 1>And I'll get to the Lakers piece of it in

0:12:03.000 --> 0:12:07.760
<v Speaker 1>a minute. I'm not saying that there is a perfect

0:12:07.880 --> 0:12:13.400
<v Speaker 1>solution for what he's trying to accomplish. What I'm saying

0:12:13.720 --> 0:12:22.480
<v Speaker 1>is the narrative that a huge impediment to winning is

0:12:22.720 --> 0:12:25.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, when you pay a player way more than

0:12:25.760 --> 0:12:30.040
<v Speaker 1>he's worth, that's gonna hurt you. Like the example of

0:12:30.040 --> 0:12:34.559
<v Speaker 1>people use is you know, Kobe at the end when

0:12:34.640 --> 0:12:38.800
<v Speaker 1>Lebron was, according to NBA voters, which I am not,

0:12:40.000 --> 0:12:42.319
<v Speaker 1>was the sixth best player in the league last year.

0:12:43.320 --> 0:12:48.679
<v Speaker 1>So that part is to me just erroneous. Then there

0:12:48.800 --> 0:12:52.760
<v Speaker 1>is the Okay, you've made over a billion dollars, you

0:12:52.920 --> 0:12:57.000
<v Speaker 1>want the Lakers to be more competitive, take less money

0:12:57.559 --> 0:13:02.400
<v Speaker 1>Dirk style and give them flexibility. When you look at

0:13:02.440 --> 0:13:05.880
<v Speaker 1>it that him taking less money would not have given

0:13:05.920 --> 0:13:11.840
<v Speaker 1>them any flexibility. And then there is this other part

0:13:11.880 --> 0:13:17.360
<v Speaker 1>of it which I mentioned on TV yesterday, and it

0:13:17.640 --> 0:13:20.959
<v Speaker 1>was the way it was captioned made it seem like

0:13:21.080 --> 0:13:23.839
<v Speaker 1>more of a shot at Durant than I wanted it

0:13:24.000 --> 0:13:27.719
<v Speaker 1>to be. But I said what I said, which was

0:13:28.240 --> 0:13:31.360
<v Speaker 1>and this is the part to me demans that I

0:13:31.600 --> 0:13:38.560
<v Speaker 1>find no one can explain this to me correctly, nobody.

0:13:40.559 --> 0:13:44.680
<v Speaker 1>Do who do you think right right now this moment,

0:13:44.760 --> 0:13:46.760
<v Speaker 1>And there's no wrong answer here to monse because you

0:13:46.840 --> 0:13:49.040
<v Speaker 1>might disagree with me. Who do you think right now

0:13:49.120 --> 0:13:54.640
<v Speaker 1>this moment is better Durant or Lebron? And do you

0:13:54.760 --> 0:13:56.560
<v Speaker 1>think it's close in either direction?

0:13:57.160 --> 0:14:02.280
<v Speaker 2>Offensively, I'd say Kevin Durant. But as far as who's

0:14:02.320 --> 0:14:06.080
<v Speaker 2>a better player, the better players just yeah, better all around.

0:14:06.120 --> 0:14:09.000
<v Speaker 1>I'd have to give it to Lebron. But it's either way,

0:14:09.040 --> 0:14:12.079
<v Speaker 1>it's pretty close, probably, right, yeah, exactly, like the like

0:14:12.200 --> 0:14:14.640
<v Speaker 1>if one guy's the eighth best player in the league,

0:14:14.679 --> 0:14:16.800
<v Speaker 1>the other guy's the tenth best player in the league

0:14:16.880 --> 0:14:21.000
<v Speaker 1>or nine to twelve or whatever. Right, So I and

0:14:21.800 --> 0:14:26.520
<v Speaker 1>despite the age, I think we can agree that Lebron

0:14:26.760 --> 0:14:30.400
<v Speaker 1>is the more durable player has been Like you know

0:14:30.400 --> 0:14:36.760
<v Speaker 1>what I mean? Lebron is less likely to miss thirty

0:14:36.840 --> 0:14:40.200
<v Speaker 1>games with an injury. That's just that's not a matter

0:14:40.280 --> 0:14:43.160
<v Speaker 1>of opinion. We just we just know it. Okay. So

0:14:43.360 --> 0:14:50.200
<v Speaker 1>here's what I don't understand. Kevin Durant was available for trade,

0:14:53.120 --> 0:14:58.200
<v Speaker 1>and the media lost its mind. Who should go after him?

0:14:58.520 --> 0:15:02.600
<v Speaker 1>These are the teams Rant doesn't want, the Minnesota Should

0:15:02.680 --> 0:15:05.920
<v Speaker 1>Minnesota trade for him? Anyway? If you trade for him,

0:15:05.960 --> 0:15:07.760
<v Speaker 1>do you just do you want to just give him

0:15:07.760 --> 0:15:11.200
<v Speaker 1>a contract? The Rockets were the two seed, gave up

0:15:11.280 --> 0:15:14.800
<v Speaker 1>their leading scorer, a valuable defender who I don't like

0:15:14.880 --> 0:15:17.200
<v Speaker 1>in Dylan Brooks, and the tenth pick of the draft,

0:15:17.520 --> 0:15:20.720
<v Speaker 1>and everyone's reaction was like, what a great job by

0:15:20.760 --> 0:15:24.680
<v Speaker 1>the Rockets. They might win the title. A guy who

0:15:24.760 --> 0:15:27.280
<v Speaker 1>at the very least is as good as Durant and

0:15:27.440 --> 0:15:32.760
<v Speaker 1>I think a touch better is available potentially, and the

0:15:32.880 --> 0:15:36.360
<v Speaker 1>same media is like, who fucking want him? I mean, really,

0:15:36.600 --> 0:15:40.200
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't make any sense. That's what I don't understand.

0:15:40.920 --> 0:15:46.400
<v Speaker 1>Like last year, last year, Lebron was better than Steph.

0:15:47.600 --> 0:15:51.280
<v Speaker 1>They are similar, and Lebron's older, but again like the

0:15:51.680 --> 0:15:55.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of similar port places in their career. Steps team

0:15:55.320 --> 0:15:58.040
<v Speaker 1>was in twenty four and twenty five when they traded

0:15:58.080 --> 0:16:00.600
<v Speaker 1>for Jimmy Butler, you felt like it made them contenders.

0:16:00.840 --> 0:16:03.200
<v Speaker 1>They lost to the Timberwolves and five in the playoffs.

0:16:03.520 --> 0:16:06.800
<v Speaker 1>Lebron's team was hanging on to the three four seed.

0:16:07.280 --> 0:16:10.440
<v Speaker 1>They trade for Luca you felt like it made them contenders.

0:16:10.680 --> 0:16:13.920
<v Speaker 1>They lost to the Timberwolves and five in the playoffs.

0:16:14.280 --> 0:16:18.920
<v Speaker 1>That's like they had after very similar Olympics, very similar seasons.

0:16:19.280 --> 0:16:23.000
<v Speaker 1>They Lebron finished hire an MVP and all NBA voting,

0:16:23.080 --> 0:16:26.800
<v Speaker 1>But it was very close. Right If Steph Curry had

0:16:26.880 --> 0:16:29.520
<v Speaker 1>released a statement like I don't know about the future

0:16:29.560 --> 0:16:32.560
<v Speaker 1>of the Warriors and people thought he might be available,

0:16:33.600 --> 0:16:39.120
<v Speaker 1>it would be a full stop freakout about what teams

0:16:39.760 --> 0:16:45.120
<v Speaker 1>should package, what things to try to get him. And

0:16:45.680 --> 0:16:49.200
<v Speaker 1>we just saw it happened with Durant when last year

0:16:49.280 --> 0:16:53.440
<v Speaker 1>Lebron was better than both those guys, and the collective

0:16:53.520 --> 0:16:59.320
<v Speaker 1>reaction is well, I guess maybe maybe a team or

0:16:59.480 --> 0:17:06.000
<v Speaker 1>two should make a courtesy call and a collective eye

0:17:06.119 --> 0:17:11.520
<v Speaker 1>roll of I can't believe we're having this discussion. Has

0:17:11.560 --> 0:17:15.200
<v Speaker 1>everyone lost their mind? For the first time ever, full

0:17:15.280 --> 0:17:18.760
<v Speaker 1>blown all women's boxing megavent going down in New York

0:17:18.840 --> 0:17:22.680
<v Speaker 1>City two title fights same night, and if you're like

0:17:22.800 --> 0:17:25.159
<v Speaker 1>me and you love the action drafting Sports Book is

0:17:25.160 --> 0:17:29.000
<v Speaker 1>where it's at. Talking Katie Taylor against Amanda Serrano, the

0:17:29.160 --> 0:17:32.920
<v Speaker 1>third the Trilogy fight. I didn't even mention this to

0:17:33.000 --> 0:17:35.119
<v Speaker 1>you guys when I was talking about this before I

0:17:35.400 --> 0:17:38.080
<v Speaker 1>went to one of the first two of these that

0:17:38.280 --> 0:17:41.680
<v Speaker 1>was also in New York City. This the Trilogy is

0:17:41.760 --> 0:17:44.360
<v Speaker 1>in New York City as well. They are absolute legends.

0:17:44.680 --> 0:17:47.359
<v Speaker 1>Katie's putting her super lightweight belt on the line and

0:17:47.480 --> 0:17:50.080
<v Speaker 1>you know Serrano is bringing the heat. And don't sleep

0:17:50.119 --> 0:17:54.160
<v Speaker 1>on the comane Alicia the bomb Bomb Gardner with explosive

0:17:54.280 --> 0:17:58.480
<v Speaker 1>powers taken on the undefeated WBA interim champ Jennifer Miranda.

0:17:58.880 --> 0:18:02.639
<v Speaker 1>That one's going to fireworks. If you never bet with DraftKings,

0:18:02.680 --> 0:18:06.399
<v Speaker 1>super simple pick you think's gonna win. Truly that easy.

0:18:07.000 --> 0:18:09.400
<v Speaker 1>Check this out. If your New DraftKings throw down five

0:18:09.480 --> 0:18:12.480
<v Speaker 1>bucks and boom, you get five dollars, You get one

0:18:12.520 --> 0:18:15.920
<v Speaker 1>hundred fifty dollars pardon me, in bonus bets instantly. It's

0:18:16.040 --> 0:18:19.200
<v Speaker 1>really that simple. If your New DraftKings bet five bucks,

0:18:19.320 --> 0:18:22.600
<v Speaker 1>get one hundred fifty dollars in bonus bets instantly. Download

0:18:22.640 --> 0:18:26.359
<v Speaker 1>DraftKings sportsbook Gap Now use promo code right that's code

0:18:26.440 --> 0:18:29.320
<v Speaker 1>right WRIGHD for new customers to get one hundred fifty

0:18:29.359 --> 0:18:32.400
<v Speaker 1>dollars in bonus bets instantly when you bet just five

0:18:32.440 --> 0:18:36.360
<v Speaker 1>bucks only on DraftKings. The Crown is yours.

0:18:36.680 --> 0:18:39.280
<v Speaker 3>Gambling problem called one eight hundred gambler in New York

0:18:39.400 --> 0:18:41.760
<v Speaker 3>called eight seven seven eight open WI or text hope

0:18:41.800 --> 0:18:44.360
<v Speaker 3>and y at four six seven three six nine. In Connecticut,

0:18:44.400 --> 0:18:46.600
<v Speaker 3>help is available for a problem gambling called eight eight

0:18:46.680 --> 0:18:48.920
<v Speaker 3>eight seven eight nine seven seven seven seven or visit

0:18:49.040 --> 0:18:52.360
<v Speaker 3>CCPG dot org. Please play responsibly on behalf of boothilk

0:18:52.400 --> 0:18:55.439
<v Speaker 3>is cinemin Resorting, Kansas twenty one on over agent eligibility

0:18:55.560 --> 0:18:58.159
<v Speaker 3>varies by jurisdiction, Void and Ontario. Bet must win to

0:18:58.240 --> 0:19:01.480
<v Speaker 3>receive reward minimum minus five one hundred odds required. Bonus

0:19:01.480 --> 0:19:03.800
<v Speaker 3>BET's expire one hundred and sixty eight hours after issue.

0:19:03.840 --> 0:19:07.280
<v Speaker 3>In four additional terms and responsible gaming resources see DKNG

0:19:07.520 --> 0:19:08.800
<v Speaker 3>dot co slash audio.

0:19:09.119 --> 0:19:09.760
<v Speaker 1>So Aiden is.

0:19:09.760 --> 0:19:12.720
<v Speaker 2>Getting settled in in La, getting all comfy and all that.

0:19:12.880 --> 0:19:16.840
<v Speaker 2>Luca sent him a welcome message, you know, welcome to

0:19:17.040 --> 0:19:19.400
<v Speaker 2>La DeAndre. Aiden decided to play with you next year.

0:19:20.000 --> 0:19:22.240
<v Speaker 2>Lebron James not said anything to him though. Is there

0:19:22.359 --> 0:19:23.680
<v Speaker 2>something to read into here?

0:19:27.560 --> 0:19:36.080
<v Speaker 1>It's not nothing? Yeah, uh so this DeAndre did this

0:19:36.359 --> 0:19:44.080
<v Speaker 1>interview two days ago, I think one whatever it was,

0:19:44.280 --> 0:19:48.320
<v Speaker 1>the interview that he did, we played a piece of

0:19:49.119 --> 0:19:53.760
<v Speaker 1>on the TV show yesterday, and we did not play

0:19:53.880 --> 0:19:57.400
<v Speaker 1>this piece because it was a radio interview in La

0:19:58.160 --> 0:20:01.840
<v Speaker 1>and I, you know, I had I didn't know that

0:20:02.080 --> 0:20:06.840
<v Speaker 1>this was said. So credit to whomever clipped this and

0:20:07.400 --> 0:20:11.639
<v Speaker 1>you know, posted it, because I didn't. I hadn't listened

0:20:11.680 --> 0:20:14.800
<v Speaker 1>to the full fifteen minute or whatever radio interview it was,

0:20:16.480 --> 0:20:18.840
<v Speaker 1>and so I had only seen kind of what had

0:20:18.960 --> 0:20:24.960
<v Speaker 1>made mainstream, so to speak. But I saw this and

0:20:25.440 --> 0:20:32.399
<v Speaker 1>I was like, oh, well, that's something. So And the

0:20:32.480 --> 0:20:41.520
<v Speaker 1>reason it's something is because it is either how do

0:20:41.640 --> 0:20:45.359
<v Speaker 1>I phrase this properly, Lebron's not gonna be there? Well,

0:20:46.880 --> 0:20:52.000
<v Speaker 1>to me, it's not that is so that is by

0:20:52.119 --> 0:20:56.000
<v Speaker 1>no means like, oh lock it in because of that this,

0:20:56.960 --> 0:21:03.680
<v Speaker 1>but it certainly added a little more fuel to the

0:21:03.840 --> 0:21:07.960
<v Speaker 1>idea that Lebron James might not be a Laker next year.

0:21:08.880 --> 0:21:12.840
<v Speaker 1>That it's that so famously or I shouldn't. I don't

0:21:12.840 --> 0:21:15.320
<v Speaker 1>know if it's famous, but at least to me, it

0:21:15.480 --> 0:21:20.760
<v Speaker 1>is Lebron when he announced he was going back to Cleveland,

0:21:21.760 --> 0:21:25.480
<v Speaker 1>and he did it with Lee Jenkins. In an SI article,

0:21:27.720 --> 0:21:31.760
<v Speaker 1>he listed all the guys he was excited to be

0:21:31.880 --> 0:21:35.840
<v Speaker 1>playing with with the Caps, and he had not listed

0:21:36.760 --> 0:21:42.440
<v Speaker 1>number one overall pick from a week prior, Andrew Wiggins.

0:21:43.320 --> 0:21:46.879
<v Speaker 1>And one way to read that was the article was

0:21:46.920 --> 0:21:50.920
<v Speaker 1>written before the draft, or that he was you know,

0:21:51.080 --> 0:21:55.439
<v Speaker 1>he was only thinking about or including the active veterans.

0:21:55.560 --> 0:21:59.800
<v Speaker 1>And another way to look at it was Lebron exp

0:22:00.240 --> 0:22:03.800
<v Speaker 1>did that they would be trading Wiggins as part of

0:22:03.920 --> 0:22:08.119
<v Speaker 1>getting a veteran win now guy, and that is exactly

0:22:08.160 --> 0:22:10.600
<v Speaker 1>and so he did not want to include Andrew Wiggins

0:22:10.680 --> 0:22:12.280
<v Speaker 1>when he did not think he was ever going to

0:22:12.359 --> 0:22:17.000
<v Speaker 1>be playing with Andrew Wiggins, which is exactly what they did.

0:22:17.960 --> 0:22:22.119
<v Speaker 1>So here are before I give my opinion on what

0:22:22.280 --> 0:22:27.480
<v Speaker 1>I think this actually is, let's lay out all of

0:22:27.800 --> 0:22:32.920
<v Speaker 1>the available options for this and we can, you know,

0:22:33.040 --> 0:22:35.040
<v Speaker 1>put a percentage on each of them at the end.

0:22:35.440 --> 0:22:43.280
<v Speaker 1>Option one busy guy forgot. Let's like again, like these

0:22:43.320 --> 0:22:46.600
<v Speaker 1>are not power ranked in order. I'm just saying, if

0:22:46.720 --> 0:22:50.160
<v Speaker 1>we want to lay out all of the possibilities, right,

0:22:50.920 --> 0:22:55.080
<v Speaker 1>Option one Busy guy forgot. I guess Option two is

0:22:56.040 --> 0:22:59.000
<v Speaker 1>not that Busy didn't forget, but has some feud with

0:22:59.119 --> 0:23:01.960
<v Speaker 1>DeAndre eight we didn't know about, and he's furious about

0:23:02.000 --> 0:23:04.200
<v Speaker 1>this trade. I would say of all these, that's probably

0:23:04.240 --> 0:23:06.280
<v Speaker 1>the least likely. I think if there was a DeAndre

0:23:06.359 --> 0:23:08.399
<v Speaker 1>eight and Lebron beef, we would have known about it right.

0:23:09.000 --> 0:23:15.200
<v Speaker 1>Option three he did and DeAndre didn't see the text.

0:23:15.359 --> 0:23:19.320
<v Speaker 1>Deandre's wrong because he said Luca texted him and Lebron

0:23:19.480 --> 0:23:22.160
<v Speaker 1>didn't so at night and he didn't say anyone talked

0:23:22.160 --> 0:23:24.320
<v Speaker 1>to him on the phone. They missed the text. Got

0:23:24.400 --> 0:23:27.680
<v Speaker 1>so many texts that you know, when the news broke

0:23:27.800 --> 0:23:29.800
<v Speaker 1>that he got a text from a number that he

0:23:29.880 --> 0:23:33.360
<v Speaker 1>didn't have, it was like, yo, congrats man, let's get

0:23:33.440 --> 0:23:35.879
<v Speaker 1>it and he was like, okay, whatever, and it turns

0:23:35.920 --> 0:23:40.240
<v Speaker 1>out that's Lebron James. Again, these are not power ranked

0:23:40.280 --> 0:23:42.680
<v Speaker 1>in order. I'm just trying to lay out all of

0:23:42.760 --> 0:23:48.159
<v Speaker 1>the available possibilities. Those first three, by the way, slim

0:23:48.359 --> 0:23:52.239
<v Speaker 1>to very very slim, but they're on the possibilities all

0:23:52.320 --> 0:24:01.920
<v Speaker 1>right now. The more salacious ones that Lebron does not

0:24:03.400 --> 0:24:07.760
<v Speaker 1>want to tell DeAndre Ayton excited to play with you

0:24:08.480 --> 0:24:11.439
<v Speaker 1>when he does not know if he will be playing

0:24:11.480 --> 0:24:22.200
<v Speaker 1>with him, and then the last option is Lebron wants

0:24:22.320 --> 0:24:27.480
<v Speaker 1>to expect to be playing with DeAndre Ayton, but wants

0:24:27.640 --> 0:24:33.560
<v Speaker 1>to keep maximum pressure on the Lakers to make every

0:24:33.760 --> 0:24:37.760
<v Speaker 1>move possible to make their team better going into this year,

0:24:38.280 --> 0:24:42.760
<v Speaker 1>and the only leverage he has over them right now

0:24:43.040 --> 0:24:47.760
<v Speaker 1>is the specter of well maybe I don't think I'm

0:24:47.800 --> 0:24:52.200
<v Speaker 1>going to be on this team. That to me, those

0:24:52.240 --> 0:24:59.120
<v Speaker 1>are the those five possibilities cover you know, ninety nine

0:24:59.320 --> 0:25:05.280
<v Speaker 1>percent of the call it one hundred percent of what

0:25:05.480 --> 0:25:09.760
<v Speaker 1>the reason could be. Here's how I would apply the

0:25:10.000 --> 0:25:15.160
<v Speaker 1>likelihood of each my first draft pick of that would

0:25:15.200 --> 0:25:18.920
<v Speaker 1>be Lebron thinks he's going to be on the Lakers,

0:25:20.520 --> 0:25:24.080
<v Speaker 1>did not reach out to DeAndre because he had a

0:25:24.160 --> 0:25:27.680
<v Speaker 1>feeling it would be become public that he had not

0:25:27.840 --> 0:25:31.480
<v Speaker 1>yet reached out to DeAndre and wants to keep the

0:25:31.680 --> 0:25:37.600
<v Speaker 1>pressure on Rob Polenka to continue to improve the roster, which,

0:25:38.200 --> 0:25:44.639
<v Speaker 1>if we're being honest, they have had a underwhelming off season.

0:25:46.440 --> 0:25:48.280
<v Speaker 1>On that note, if I may, then I'll get back

0:25:48.280 --> 0:25:50.520
<v Speaker 1>to the percentage's parts. Because Brew and I got into

0:25:50.640 --> 0:25:55.080
<v Speaker 1>this yesterday. Going into this off season, we felt like

0:25:55.240 --> 0:26:01.720
<v Speaker 1>the Lakers. It was an absolute lock and mandatory that

0:26:01.840 --> 0:26:05.720
<v Speaker 1>they upgrade the center position. They did do that, and

0:26:05.880 --> 0:26:08.280
<v Speaker 1>they did that in an interesting way where they didn't

0:26:08.320 --> 0:26:10.239
<v Speaker 1>have to give up assets, where it didn't cost them

0:26:10.280 --> 0:26:13.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot of money, and the talent upside is quite high.

0:26:14.560 --> 0:26:17.359
<v Speaker 1>But it's also a guy who's six years into his

0:26:17.520 --> 0:26:21.520
<v Speaker 1>career has been unreliable and not that mature and really

0:26:21.680 --> 0:26:23.480
<v Speaker 1>alienated teammates and coaches.

0:26:23.880 --> 0:26:27.240
<v Speaker 2>So I really think Lebron James is like, man, y'all

0:26:27.280 --> 0:26:29.120
<v Speaker 2>got DeAndre and that's not the center I wanted.

0:26:29.280 --> 0:26:32.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm not texting him, I'm not welcome. Oh it's got

0:26:32.880 --> 0:26:35.000
<v Speaker 1>to the team. Oh so youth. Oh so you think,

0:26:35.080 --> 0:26:37.719
<v Speaker 1>oh I should have included that one. I guess as

0:26:37.760 --> 0:26:41.560
<v Speaker 1>a good Lebron is Lebron is pissed that it was

0:26:41.640 --> 0:26:46.639
<v Speaker 1>a Yeah, Oh so I didn't. Actually, So the reason

0:26:46.720 --> 0:26:48.760
<v Speaker 1>I didn't even think of that, but that's obvious. I

0:26:48.960 --> 0:26:52.280
<v Speaker 1>definitely should have. I guess that's kind of that, you know,

0:26:52.400 --> 0:26:56.720
<v Speaker 1>in the lock of de Thief. Oh yeah, for sure.

0:26:58.119 --> 0:27:05.280
<v Speaker 1>So here's the reason that I'm I don't put a

0:27:05.320 --> 0:27:06.960
<v Speaker 1>pin in that real quick, and let me finish this

0:27:07.080 --> 0:27:08.640
<v Speaker 1>other thought. Then we'll get to that one. Because that's good.

0:27:08.640 --> 0:27:14.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm glad you mentioned that one. So they did get

0:27:15.080 --> 0:27:17.639
<v Speaker 1>a center, and we can argue about if it was

0:27:17.720 --> 0:27:20.160
<v Speaker 1>their best option, if it was the best of bad options,

0:27:20.240 --> 0:27:22.960
<v Speaker 1>whatever it is. But the rest of the roster not

0:27:23.119 --> 0:27:28.480
<v Speaker 1>only remained basically unchanged, but got to touch worse because

0:27:28.560 --> 0:27:33.000
<v Speaker 1>switching out Dorian Finney Smith for Jake Lauravia is at

0:27:33.040 --> 0:27:36.399
<v Speaker 1>the very least in the short term of downgrade and

0:27:36.560 --> 0:27:42.639
<v Speaker 1>so there would be real frustration there. So I would

0:27:42.760 --> 0:27:48.159
<v Speaker 1>put Lebron expects to be a Laker but wants to

0:27:48.359 --> 0:27:51.360
<v Speaker 1>keep the screws on the Lakers to continue to make

0:27:51.480 --> 0:27:56.119
<v Speaker 1>moves as the reason for him not reaching out. I

0:27:56.160 --> 0:27:59.600
<v Speaker 1>would put that at sixty five percent. I think that

0:27:59.840 --> 0:28:07.399
<v Speaker 1>is the biggest percentage here. I would put Lebron didn't

0:28:07.440 --> 0:28:10.119
<v Speaker 1>reach out because he does not think he's going to

0:28:10.200 --> 0:28:16.760
<v Speaker 1>be a Laker next year at twenty percent. I think

0:28:16.840 --> 0:28:21.560
<v Speaker 1>there is a one in five shot right now that

0:28:21.800 --> 0:28:26.400
<v Speaker 1>Lebron thinks, yeah, I'm not going to be on the team. Now,

0:28:26.480 --> 0:28:32.959
<v Speaker 1>that's not that's that's not huge, but it's not nothing.

0:28:34.280 --> 0:28:38.920
<v Speaker 1>It's you know, more likely than rolling a single die

0:28:39.120 --> 0:28:41.960
<v Speaker 1>and rolling a six or any number on the die,

0:28:42.000 --> 0:28:45.760
<v Speaker 1>any particular number on the die, so sixty five percent

0:28:45.840 --> 0:28:49.360
<v Speaker 1>he's trying to keep the pressure on him. Twenty percent

0:28:50.160 --> 0:28:57.600
<v Speaker 1>he he doesn't think he's going to be there. I

0:28:57.720 --> 0:29:02.440
<v Speaker 1>will give Demons's he you know this is not the

0:29:02.560 --> 0:29:07.520
<v Speaker 1>player he wanted and therefore he didn't reach out at

0:29:07.680 --> 0:29:15.440
<v Speaker 1>five percent. I will certainly massively upgrade Demonse's theory if

0:29:15.520 --> 0:29:18.240
<v Speaker 1>we found out he did reach out to Jake Laavia,

0:29:19.120 --> 0:29:21.480
<v Speaker 1>if like he was like, yo, man, let's get it,

0:29:23.040 --> 0:29:27.520
<v Speaker 1>then then your likelihood is way way higher. I will

0:29:27.600 --> 0:29:32.720
<v Speaker 1>put it at busy guy just didn't do it at

0:29:33.240 --> 0:29:37.160
<v Speaker 1>five percent, and that leaves what oh, that leaves five

0:29:37.280 --> 0:29:40.520
<v Speaker 1>more percent left, and I will put it at he

0:29:40.760 --> 0:29:45.280
<v Speaker 1>did reach out. DeAndre Ayton didn't have the number saved

0:29:45.360 --> 0:29:47.720
<v Speaker 1>and did not know it was Lebron who was like,

0:29:47.720 --> 0:29:51.040
<v Speaker 1>why is this person texting me with a crown at

0:29:51.160 --> 0:29:54.800
<v Speaker 1>four percent, and I will put there is a long

0:29:54.960 --> 0:29:59.360
<v Speaker 1>standing maybe base, maybe out of loyalty to his buddy

0:29:59.480 --> 0:30:05.480
<v Speaker 1>crisp All DeAndre Ayton beef at one percent. So that's

0:30:06.040 --> 0:30:09.680
<v Speaker 1>that's how I handicap this whole thing. It's not nothing though,

0:30:11.600 --> 0:30:19.000
<v Speaker 1>that's my takeaway. It's not nothing, and I I am

0:30:19.280 --> 0:30:23.240
<v Speaker 1>interested in the next time could you know, because you

0:30:23.320 --> 0:30:27.480
<v Speaker 1>know what's also not nothing? Demanse if we're doing the

0:30:27.640 --> 0:30:34.200
<v Speaker 1>not nothing meter. The Lakers who sent out a bunch

0:30:34.240 --> 0:30:37.680
<v Speaker 1>of press releases about a bunch of offseason moves. The

0:30:37.800 --> 0:30:44.400
<v Speaker 1>Lakers not sending out a press release about Lebron opting

0:30:44.480 --> 0:30:49.640
<v Speaker 1>into his player option. That's also not nothing. Now does

0:30:49.720 --> 0:30:54.320
<v Speaker 1>that mean it's everything at no? No, no no. This

0:30:54.600 --> 0:30:59.280
<v Speaker 1>press releases come from the team, like your official press

0:30:59.400 --> 0:31:02.440
<v Speaker 1>release is released by the team and sent to all

0:31:02.600 --> 0:31:05.040
<v Speaker 1>NBA media. The most you want to know, the most

0:31:05.080 --> 0:31:09.120
<v Speaker 1>famous NBA press release ever. Hold on, I gotta, I gotta.

0:31:09.120 --> 0:31:10.840
<v Speaker 1>I want to quote it to you exactly. This is

0:31:10.840 --> 0:31:15.040
<v Speaker 1>an all time one. So pat Riley, who's never my

0:31:16.000 --> 0:31:18.320
<v Speaker 1>light just fell? Do I still look? Okay? I hope?

0:31:18.360 --> 0:31:26.240
<v Speaker 1>So the so pat Riley un official in Miami Heat

0:31:26.400 --> 0:31:31.880
<v Speaker 1>letterhead sent out to the league, league comes and everyone

0:31:32.040 --> 0:31:42.040
<v Speaker 1>covering the league after Danny Ainge took a shot at

0:31:43.920 --> 0:31:47.640
<v Speaker 1>pat Riley. So this is so let me give you

0:31:47.640 --> 0:31:51.320
<v Speaker 1>the background. Danny Ainge till Boston is twenty thirteen, Danny

0:31:51.320 --> 0:31:56.360
<v Speaker 1>Angelo Boston radio station WEI that Lebron James had no

0:31:57.040 --> 0:32:01.480
<v Speaker 1>cause to challenge officials for failing to classify fouls assessed

0:32:02.040 --> 0:32:05.640
<v Speaker 1>Kirk Heinrich and Taj Gibson as flagrant. He said, quote,

0:32:06.040 --> 0:32:09.160
<v Speaker 1>I think the referees got the calls right. I don't

0:32:09.160 --> 0:32:10.920
<v Speaker 1>think it was a hard foul. I think the one

0:32:11.000 --> 0:32:14.480
<v Speaker 1>involving Lebron against Boozer that was a flagrant. I think

0:32:14.520 --> 0:32:17.080
<v Speaker 1>the officials got it right. I think that it's almost

0:32:17.200 --> 0:32:25.960
<v Speaker 1>embarrassing that Lebron would complain about officiating and the So

0:32:26.760 --> 0:32:31.200
<v Speaker 1>Danny Ainge, who was running the Celtics, comments on the

0:32:31.360 --> 0:32:34.640
<v Speaker 1>radio about something that was happening between the Heat and

0:32:34.720 --> 0:32:39.240
<v Speaker 1>the Bulls. So pat Riley has the Miami Heat press

0:32:39.360 --> 0:32:44.600
<v Speaker 1>office type up an official press release that reads, and

0:32:44.840 --> 0:32:48.680
<v Speaker 1>I quote, Danny Ainge needs to shut the fuck up

0:32:48.760 --> 0:32:52.200
<v Speaker 1>and manage his own team. He was the biggest whiner

0:32:52.360 --> 0:32:54.720
<v Speaker 1>going when he was playing, and I know that because

0:32:54.720 --> 0:32:59.239
<v Speaker 1>I coached against him. End of statement. I like, at

0:32:59.280 --> 0:33:04.960
<v Speaker 1>all time, at all time, all take the fine, but

0:33:05.680 --> 0:33:09.880
<v Speaker 1>I've never liked this guy. I coached against him, we

0:33:10.080 --> 0:33:14.320
<v Speaker 1>now play against him. And I quote Danny Ainge needs

0:33:14.360 --> 0:33:16.840
<v Speaker 1>to shut the fuck up and manage his own team.

0:33:17.160 --> 0:33:19.520
<v Speaker 1>He was the biggest whiner going when he was playing,

0:33:19.560 --> 0:33:22.640
<v Speaker 1>and I know that because I coached against him. Oh

0:33:22.840 --> 0:33:27.200
<v Speaker 1>my goodness, gracious, Danny ains then again, I don't know

0:33:27.320 --> 0:33:31.200
<v Speaker 1>why we're doing this. Aine then replies, I stand by

0:33:31.240 --> 0:33:34.320
<v Speaker 1>what I said. That's all. I don't care about pat Riley.

0:33:34.440 --> 0:33:36.800
<v Speaker 1>He can say whatever he wants. But this is just

0:33:36.920 --> 0:33:39.520
<v Speaker 1>Danny Ainge talking. This isn't a press release. This is

0:33:39.640 --> 0:33:43.200
<v Speaker 1>Danny Ainge. And then Aine added, I don't want to

0:33:43.400 --> 0:33:46.240
<v Speaker 1>mess up his Armani suits and all that hair goop.

0:33:46.600 --> 0:33:51.680
<v Speaker 1>It would be way too expensive for me. And so

0:33:52.640 --> 0:33:56.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this is a that's so sorry about that.

0:33:56.680 --> 0:33:59.239
<v Speaker 1>I mean, pat Riley's just such a legend. I mean,

0:33:59.280 --> 0:34:03.040
<v Speaker 1>he's just sucking y'all. I remember when that came out

0:34:03.680 --> 0:34:05.760
<v Speaker 1>and I was like, I didn't even know that was

0:34:05.840 --> 0:34:10.200
<v Speaker 1>like a loud like in official communications. I guess, you

0:34:10.280 --> 0:34:13.919
<v Speaker 1>know what a simpler time. Yeah.

0:34:13.960 --> 0:34:16.359
<v Speaker 2>So Holmes wants to get past that Super Bowl loss

0:34:16.400 --> 0:34:18.400
<v Speaker 2>and get that nasty taste out of his mouth, and

0:34:18.480 --> 0:34:20.839
<v Speaker 2>he's it's also getting tired of all the talk, saying

0:34:20.880 --> 0:34:22.279
<v Speaker 2>that he wants to just settle all this on the

0:34:22.320 --> 0:34:26.239
<v Speaker 2>football field. This is another thing that really annoyed you,

0:34:26.719 --> 0:34:28.960
<v Speaker 2>which I'm curious what the angle is here?

0:34:29.040 --> 0:34:31.640
<v Speaker 1>What what pg off? Well, it's not no, no, no,

0:34:33.440 --> 0:34:40.239
<v Speaker 1>his comments didn't annoy me last week, which was so,

0:34:40.440 --> 0:34:45.200
<v Speaker 1>here's the deal. If someone wants to have the courage

0:34:47.239 --> 0:34:51.759
<v Speaker 1>to come out and be like, you know what, you know,

0:34:53.600 --> 0:34:58.800
<v Speaker 1>here's a take, free take for someone who wants it. Okay,

0:35:00.280 --> 0:35:08.760
<v Speaker 1>It's just sometimes sometimes I'm disappointed in uh my industry

0:35:08.920 --> 0:35:12.920
<v Speaker 1>because there are these I can see these. I'm like, oh,

0:35:13.040 --> 0:35:15.520
<v Speaker 1>that would be a good take. I don't believe it.

0:35:16.280 --> 0:35:20.319
<v Speaker 1>But no one has made had this take, and it's

0:35:20.520 --> 0:35:23.480
<v Speaker 1>right there, and I know it would cut through the

0:35:23.640 --> 0:35:28.120
<v Speaker 1>noise and you could establish yourself with it, and no one,

0:35:29.440 --> 0:35:32.279
<v Speaker 1>no one, no one has said it. Now, I don't

0:35:32.320 --> 0:35:35.000
<v Speaker 1>believe this. This is not my take. So consider this

0:35:35.920 --> 0:35:43.000
<v Speaker 1>like the sports take version of developing some type of

0:35:44.000 --> 0:35:46.440
<v Speaker 1>vaccine or cure for something and be like, we're not

0:35:46.600 --> 0:35:49.840
<v Speaker 1>patenting it. Anyone can copy it free for the world

0:35:50.000 --> 0:35:58.800
<v Speaker 1>public use. Here's a take. The last few years, Patrick

0:35:58.920 --> 0:36:07.440
<v Speaker 1>Mahomes has pretty clearly not been judged based on his numbers.

0:36:08.239 --> 0:36:11.160
<v Speaker 1>He's been judged based on the fact that his team wins,

0:36:12.280 --> 0:36:15.960
<v Speaker 1>that he is a leader, that he plays his best

0:36:16.040 --> 0:36:19.920
<v Speaker 1>in the biggest spots, and that is how he has

0:36:20.040 --> 0:36:28.040
<v Speaker 1>held onto the best quarterback alive Moniker despite the fact

0:36:28.120 --> 0:36:34.640
<v Speaker 1>that his two biggest conference rivals, Josh Allen Lamar Jackson,

0:36:34.680 --> 0:36:40.440
<v Speaker 1>have both won league in vps in this time and

0:36:41.160 --> 0:36:45.759
<v Speaker 1>if that has allowed Mahomes to climb to the top

0:36:45.840 --> 0:36:55.040
<v Speaker 1>of the quarterback mountain, then the exact same standard should

0:36:55.080 --> 0:37:02.359
<v Speaker 1>be used to evaluate Jalen Hurts and Jail Who's never

0:37:02.480 --> 0:37:06.600
<v Speaker 1>missed the playoffs, whose team wins double digit games every year,

0:37:07.120 --> 0:37:10.040
<v Speaker 1>who's been to two Super Bowls, been awesome in both.

0:37:11.640 --> 0:37:15.680
<v Speaker 1>Some would argue out played Mahomes in both, certainly in

0:37:15.800 --> 0:37:20.960
<v Speaker 1>this last one, and has done it with what you know,

0:37:21.800 --> 0:37:26.880
<v Speaker 1>let's call it, a polarizing coach and a polarizing receiver

0:37:27.880 --> 0:37:33.000
<v Speaker 1>in a tough city and now is coming off, you know,

0:37:33.280 --> 0:37:36.799
<v Speaker 1>leading an offense to damn near one hundred points combined

0:37:37.360 --> 0:37:43.160
<v Speaker 1>in the conference championship game in the Super Bowl and

0:37:43.680 --> 0:37:46.000
<v Speaker 1>puts his body on the line, doesn't care about his

0:37:46.120 --> 0:37:50.160
<v Speaker 1>passing numbers for the most unstoppable play in football. That

0:37:50.480 --> 0:37:56.960
<v Speaker 1>player the defending Super Bowl MVP. He's the best quarterback alive.

0:37:59.719 --> 0:38:08.840
<v Speaker 1>And take that take is again, I do not believe it,

0:38:11.280 --> 0:38:14.319
<v Speaker 1>but it doesn't have a ton of logical holes if

0:38:14.480 --> 0:38:25.200
<v Speaker 1>someone wanted to have it instead, these dopes want to

0:38:26.360 --> 0:38:30.560
<v Speaker 1>knock Mahomes off his perch of best quarterback in the league.

0:38:31.400 --> 0:38:37.480
<v Speaker 1>And they are doing it for one of three quarterbacks,

0:38:38.080 --> 0:38:41.000
<v Speaker 1>really one of two and mostly one of just one

0:38:41.800 --> 0:38:45.840
<v Speaker 1>who's never once out played him in a big spot.

0:38:48.400 --> 0:38:54.120
<v Speaker 1>It's the majority of quarterback rankings lists right now. I

0:38:54.120 --> 0:38:59.600
<v Speaker 1>have Josh Allen number one, which is hilarious and in

0:38:59.719 --> 0:39:05.800
<v Speaker 1>the file, and it is not an allowable take until

0:39:06.080 --> 0:39:10.960
<v Speaker 1>one time in a spot that matters. He it's not

0:39:11.000 --> 0:39:15.400
<v Speaker 1>a quarterback winsday he outplays Patrick, and the last two years,

0:39:15.480 --> 0:39:18.239
<v Speaker 1>one in his building, one in the Chiefs building, He's

0:39:18.280 --> 0:39:20.360
<v Speaker 1>had the ball in his hands, chance to go do it,

0:39:20.719 --> 0:39:24.359
<v Speaker 1>and it couldn't get forty yards either time, So that's

0:39:24.480 --> 0:39:30.319
<v Speaker 1>not allowed. Lamar can win every MVP from here until retirement,

0:39:30.800 --> 0:39:34.480
<v Speaker 1>and until he wins a single big game, it's obviously

0:39:34.560 --> 0:39:39.960
<v Speaker 1>not allowed. And Joe Burrow had outplayed Patrick in a

0:39:40.040 --> 0:39:45.360
<v Speaker 1>big spot, had a chance to really put a stake

0:39:45.480 --> 0:39:49.600
<v Speaker 1>in the heart of the Chiefs through fourth quarter interception

0:39:49.760 --> 0:39:52.680
<v Speaker 1>the conference championship game lost and hasn't been back to

0:39:52.680 --> 0:39:58.160
<v Speaker 1>the playoffs since, And the amount of people trying to

0:39:58.560 --> 0:40:04.600
<v Speaker 1>argue any one of those three guys has ascended past

0:40:04.680 --> 0:40:08.239
<v Speaker 1>Patrick because Patrick got beat by Jalen Arts and they

0:40:08.320 --> 0:40:10.680
<v Speaker 1>played poorly in the Super Bowl. It's the dumbest shit

0:40:10.680 --> 0:40:14.080
<v Speaker 1>I've ever heard. You then combine it with this whole

0:40:14.239 --> 0:40:22.320
<v Speaker 1>ooh to the Chiefs era over based on what that

0:40:22.440 --> 0:40:26.239
<v Speaker 1>they were just the second best team in football last year,

0:40:27.760 --> 0:40:31.279
<v Speaker 1>based on the fact that they just completed the best

0:40:31.360 --> 0:40:33.680
<v Speaker 1>three year stretch in the history of the league and

0:40:33.800 --> 0:40:36.440
<v Speaker 1>are tied for the best five and seven year stretches

0:40:36.480 --> 0:40:38.680
<v Speaker 1>in the history of the league. What is the what

0:40:38.880 --> 0:40:41.719
<v Speaker 1>is the piece of evidence you have, like, oh, this

0:40:41.960 --> 0:40:44.359
<v Speaker 1>might be the Broncos or Chargers year. There is none,

0:40:45.719 --> 0:40:50.800
<v Speaker 1>And so the again, the Eagles have bragging rights and

0:40:50.920 --> 0:40:53.360
<v Speaker 1>Jalen Hurts has bragging rights. And the Eagles have it

0:40:53.440 --> 0:40:55.920
<v Speaker 1>because they won as a team, and Jalen Hurts has

0:40:55.960 --> 0:40:59.000
<v Speaker 1>it because individually he played. You know, he was the

0:40:59.080 --> 0:41:03.520
<v Speaker 1>best quarterback on the field that Sunday. But these AFC

0:41:04.520 --> 0:41:12.120
<v Speaker 1>also rans that are being elevated because of what I

0:41:12.480 --> 0:41:17.319
<v Speaker 1>just I can't I can't deal with just one time

0:41:18.280 --> 0:41:22.160
<v Speaker 1>at one time? Can I just see? It's what I

0:41:22.320 --> 0:41:26.080
<v Speaker 1>said to that guy in Hawaii, the is guy I'm

0:41:26.160 --> 0:41:32.800
<v Speaker 1>walking I'm walking with the family down the boardwalk in

0:41:32.960 --> 0:41:39.000
<v Speaker 1>Honolulu and this guy walks up to me. It's like,

0:41:39.160 --> 0:41:45.160
<v Speaker 1>a man, this is Bill's country out here in my head,

0:41:45.239 --> 0:41:50.719
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, no, it's fucking not, man. It's actually I'm

0:41:50.800 --> 0:41:53.960
<v Speaker 1>not sure there's a place in the United States that

0:41:54.280 --> 0:42:01.800
<v Speaker 1>is that is further removed literally geographically but also spiritually

0:42:02.320 --> 0:42:08.160
<v Speaker 1>from Buffalo, New York as the boardwalk in Honolulu. Like,

0:42:08.360 --> 0:42:11.640
<v Speaker 1>first of all, it's just a bad take. Second of all,

0:42:12.160 --> 0:42:18.000
<v Speaker 1>get a life. I didn't say any of that. I'm like, okay,

0:42:18.600 --> 0:42:24.640
<v Speaker 1>nice to me. Like five minutes later, he runs me

0:42:24.800 --> 0:42:28.560
<v Speaker 1>down and was like, hey, man, I'm so sorry I

0:42:28.680 --> 0:42:33.080
<v Speaker 1>said that. Can I please get a picture? And I'm

0:42:33.120 --> 0:42:37.920
<v Speaker 1>like sure, so I take the picture. He's like yeah, man, thanks,

0:42:38.080 --> 0:42:40.200
<v Speaker 1>sorry about that, and I'm like sorry. But then I

0:42:40.239 --> 0:42:42.360
<v Speaker 1>couldn't resist because I was like, I'm with my wife

0:42:42.440 --> 0:42:45.360
<v Speaker 1>and kids like, so I was like, I was like,

0:42:45.520 --> 0:42:48.640
<v Speaker 1>hey and listen, man, one day you'll win a big game.

0:42:49.320 --> 0:42:51.440
<v Speaker 1>And I saw a look on his face and it's stung.

0:42:51.680 --> 0:42:55.839
<v Speaker 1>You know why. It's stung the same reason why when

0:42:55.960 --> 0:43:00.200
<v Speaker 1>people put up that picture of me and Mahome a

0:43:00.239 --> 0:43:03.040
<v Speaker 1>couple of parades ago, where I'm smiling and my nose

0:43:03.160 --> 0:43:06.800
<v Speaker 1>is casting a shadow on my teeth. It stings because

0:43:06.840 --> 0:43:10.120
<v Speaker 1>you know it's true. I'm like, damn, that is weird.

0:43:10.880 --> 0:43:13.719
<v Speaker 1>That is like a thing that most people like. It

0:43:14.080 --> 0:43:18.120
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't be physically possible, but it's a thing, or it

0:43:18.239 --> 0:43:22.200
<v Speaker 1>does cast a shadow like that sucks. But that's why

0:43:22.239 --> 0:43:26.800
<v Speaker 1>it stung him, because he knows it's true. And so

0:43:27.080 --> 0:43:42.680
<v Speaker 1>I just don't that I it is. It's really beyond

0:43:42.960 --> 0:43:49.520
<v Speaker 1>dumb to me, the every other let me add one

0:43:49.560 --> 0:43:53.400
<v Speaker 1>other thing. And I said this to Cowherd, and he

0:43:53.600 --> 0:43:58.920
<v Speaker 1>just laughed because he knew I was right, not just

0:43:59.280 --> 0:44:08.080
<v Speaker 1>like this year, but basically for all of modern NFL history.

0:44:10.000 --> 0:44:17.360
<v Speaker 1>If there is a team in a division that everyone

0:44:17.480 --> 0:44:24.719
<v Speaker 1>agrees the same team has the division's best quarterback and

0:44:24.840 --> 0:44:31.040
<v Speaker 1>the division's best coach, that team will be the pick

0:44:31.760 --> 0:44:37.040
<v Speaker 1>to win that division. If there's no debate, like it's

0:44:37.160 --> 0:44:40.240
<v Speaker 1>just like so, I'll give you an example. NFC West,

0:44:40.719 --> 0:44:44.680
<v Speaker 1>there's a debate is McVeigh or Shanahan the best coach?

0:44:44.800 --> 0:44:47.240
<v Speaker 1>And I guess for some there might be a debate

0:44:47.400 --> 0:44:49.520
<v Speaker 1>is perty or Stafford the best quarterback? Not to me,

0:44:49.640 --> 0:44:54.200
<v Speaker 1>but what like, there's it's not often there that it

0:44:54.440 --> 0:45:00.279
<v Speaker 1>is crystal clear on both but when it is, uh,

0:45:02.040 --> 0:45:06.400
<v Speaker 1>that team is everyone's picked to win the division and

0:45:06.480 --> 0:45:08.160
<v Speaker 1>the amount of people this year that are gonna pick

0:45:08.239 --> 0:45:10.560
<v Speaker 1>fucking bon Nicks, sorry for all the curse words today

0:45:10.960 --> 0:45:15.400
<v Speaker 1>to win that division. Or Justin Herbert who again, I

0:45:15.640 --> 0:45:18.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't I don't know if he's won a big

0:45:18.239 --> 0:45:20.759
<v Speaker 1>game since high school, and I have to look at

0:45:20.800 --> 0:45:22.760
<v Speaker 1>the high school. I don't think he did it Oregon.

0:45:25.360 --> 0:45:29.200
<v Speaker 1>I it's just it's just dumb, you know what.

0:45:29.440 --> 0:45:33.640
<v Speaker 2>I just I just people get fickleed with the greatness.

0:45:34.200 --> 0:45:37.120
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if people just don't sometimes.

0:45:39.040 --> 0:45:41.560
<v Speaker 1>But they think we have the next Trent Williams and

0:45:41.680 --> 0:45:47.320
<v Speaker 1>John Simmons. Oh boy, oh boy. Now that might be

0:45:47.400 --> 0:45:49.320
<v Speaker 1>a little strong. True Williams one of the greatest players

0:45:49.360 --> 0:45:52.640
<v Speaker 1>of all time. But if they just if Josh Simmons

0:45:52.800 --> 0:45:58.520
<v Speaker 1>just ends up being the tenth best tackle left tackle

0:45:58.560 --> 0:46:02.640
<v Speaker 1>in the league slightly above average, it is such a

0:46:04.120 --> 0:46:05.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Mahome has been to five Super Bowls. He

0:46:05.880 --> 0:46:08.880
<v Speaker 1>had a different starting left tackle in all five. It

0:46:08.920 --> 0:46:17.360
<v Speaker 1>would be just such a massive, massive wors line situation.

0:46:17.560 --> 0:46:21.480
<v Speaker 1>Yet right course of this, you know, the thing is

0:46:21.560 --> 0:46:24.479
<v Speaker 1>what's weird is the Chiefs had a really good guard

0:46:24.600 --> 0:46:28.680
<v Speaker 1>center guard O line this year. The tackle, it was

0:46:28.719 --> 0:46:32.640
<v Speaker 1>the worst tackle play he's had, and previously they had

0:46:32.800 --> 0:46:34.400
<v Speaker 1>they had been bat up the middle but good of

0:46:34.440 --> 0:46:38.360
<v Speaker 1>the like, and so it got really shaky by the

0:46:38.480 --> 0:46:38.759
<v Speaker 1>end of it.