WEBVTT - AI Global Coalition, Amazon's Shareholder Letter

0:00:01.600 --> 0:00:05.920
<v Speaker 1>From Marhart where Innovation, Money and Power Collie in Silicon

0:00:06.000 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>Vallet NBN.

0:00:07.240 --> 0:00:11.480
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Technology with Caroline Hyde and Ed loud Love.

0:00:24.360 --> 0:00:27.200
<v Speaker 3>And Caroline Heide Bloomberg's world headquarters in New York and

0:00:27.200 --> 0:00:30.440
<v Speaker 3>AURM Ed Lodlow in San Francisco. This is Bloomberg Technology

0:00:30.560 --> 0:00:31.000
<v Speaker 3>coming up.

0:00:31.080 --> 0:00:34.840
<v Speaker 4>Amazon CEO Annie Jase He says that general to AI

0:00:35.000 --> 0:00:35.839
<v Speaker 4>boom is going to be.

0:00:35.800 --> 0:00:37.680
<v Speaker 5>Built on Amazon Web Services.

0:00:38.080 --> 0:00:40.040
<v Speaker 4>Or we need the takeaways from his annual letters.

0:00:39.840 --> 0:00:44.479
<v Speaker 3>To shareholders class technology heavyweights to send on Washington for

0:00:44.560 --> 0:00:46.760
<v Speaker 3>the White House steak dinner with big names like Jeff

0:00:46.760 --> 0:00:50.479
<v Speaker 3>Bezos and Tim Kirk attending a lavish event and.

0:00:50.479 --> 0:00:54.040
<v Speaker 4>Open AI CEO Sam Altman pictures a global AI coalition

0:00:54.160 --> 0:00:56.040
<v Speaker 4>on his visit to the Middle East.

0:00:56.160 --> 0:00:56.600
<v Speaker 5>Next stop.

0:00:56.800 --> 0:01:00.520
<v Speaker 4>Maybe we see him over on Capitol Hill too. We'll

0:01:00.520 --> 0:01:02.560
<v Speaker 4>discuss that and so much more throughout this hour. But Ed,

0:01:02.640 --> 0:01:04.800
<v Speaker 4>we start on these markets up a quarter of a

0:01:04.840 --> 0:01:07.679
<v Speaker 4>percentage point currently NASDAK managing.

0:01:07.280 --> 0:01:08.839
<v Speaker 5>To put itself off of its lows.

0:01:09.080 --> 0:01:12.120
<v Speaker 4>This is we once again really tackle inflationary pressures. Whether

0:01:12.160 --> 0:01:15.360
<v Speaker 4>it's a PPI number coming after the CPI print yesterday,

0:01:15.600 --> 0:01:18.360
<v Speaker 4>both showing inflationary pressures just start dialing up that little bit.

0:01:18.640 --> 0:01:21.800
<v Speaker 4>And we're seeing though, managing the NASDAK to outperform as bomb.

0:01:21.640 --> 0:01:23.600
<v Speaker 5>Markets actually pull back a little bit. I'm looking at

0:01:23.600 --> 0:01:24.520
<v Speaker 5>the two year yield.

0:01:24.720 --> 0:01:26.800
<v Speaker 4>We're outperforming on the front end of the curve, whereas

0:01:26.800 --> 0:01:29.240
<v Speaker 4>the back end, the tenure yield, for example, you'll still

0:01:29.280 --> 0:01:32.080
<v Speaker 4>pushing higher. But really the big move was yesterday, and

0:01:32.080 --> 0:01:33.959
<v Speaker 4>looking at what's happening in the euro it's not just

0:01:34.000 --> 0:01:36.240
<v Speaker 4>all about the Federal Reserve. It's about global world banks

0:01:36.240 --> 0:01:37.759
<v Speaker 4>at the moment, central.

0:01:37.360 --> 0:01:37.959
<v Speaker 5>Banks that is.

0:01:38.160 --> 0:01:40.600
<v Speaker 4>And we're looking at what the ECB said, look staying

0:01:40.600 --> 0:01:43.080
<v Speaker 4>pat as many had anticipated in terms of interest rates,

0:01:43.240 --> 0:01:46.680
<v Speaker 4>but signaling that inflationary pressures are dialing down across the Atlantic,

0:01:46.959 --> 0:01:48.960
<v Speaker 4>and therefore could we see cuts coming or off by

0:01:49.000 --> 0:01:50.680
<v Speaker 4>three tens percent versus the US dollar.

0:01:50.720 --> 0:01:52.480
<v Speaker 5>Moving on, look at what else is performing versus the

0:01:52.520 --> 0:01:54.200
<v Speaker 5>US dollar. Crypto I'm down.

0:01:54.040 --> 0:01:56.040
<v Speaker 4>By two tens percent on bitcoin at the moment, just

0:01:56.040 --> 0:01:57.520
<v Speaker 4>sub that seventy thousand dollars level.

0:01:57.560 --> 0:01:59.040
<v Speaker 5>But what are you watching on the micro.

0:01:59.440 --> 0:02:01.280
<v Speaker 3>There are a lot of stories to fit in today.

0:02:01.320 --> 0:02:02.880
<v Speaker 3>Apple's a name that we're going to look at later

0:02:02.880 --> 0:02:05.240
<v Speaker 3>in the program with Bloomberg's Mark German rough eight tens

0:02:05.280 --> 0:02:09.560
<v Speaker 3>one percent. Early unionization efforts are kind of the main headline.

0:02:09.560 --> 0:02:12.040
<v Speaker 3>But there is a note from JP Morgan analysts that

0:02:12.200 --> 0:02:14.720
<v Speaker 3>say that hedge funds are now looking at this stock

0:02:15.120 --> 0:02:19.120
<v Speaker 3>and considering what happens next with artificial intelligence in the

0:02:19.160 --> 0:02:23.160
<v Speaker 3>context of value add iOS and the handset. Hard to

0:02:23.240 --> 0:02:25.320
<v Speaker 3>know what the driver is, if any at all, but

0:02:25.360 --> 0:02:27.200
<v Speaker 3>we hire eight tens to one percent, and given its

0:02:27.280 --> 0:02:30.720
<v Speaker 3>market capitalization, we always pay attention to Apple because if

0:02:30.720 --> 0:02:34.120
<v Speaker 3>its waiting on major indices. There is an annual shareholder

0:02:34.200 --> 0:02:37.720
<v Speaker 3>letter plus AI theme in today's show. I am very

0:02:37.760 --> 0:02:41.120
<v Speaker 3>excited about it. JP Morgan is down nine tens to

0:02:41.200 --> 0:02:43.880
<v Speaker 3>one percent Monday night. I know I wasn't here earlier

0:02:43.919 --> 0:02:48.320
<v Speaker 3>in the week. Put the shareholder letter out and says AI,

0:02:48.600 --> 0:02:50.240
<v Speaker 3>and we're going to talk about the numbers behind that.

0:02:50.280 --> 0:02:52.600
<v Speaker 3>I think it's really interesting, so to Amazon up three

0:02:52.680 --> 0:02:56.639
<v Speaker 3>tens to one percent Andy Jasse's annual letter. The focus

0:02:56.680 --> 0:03:02.519
<v Speaker 3>about AI is interesting specific aws. Amazon is going to

0:03:02.520 --> 0:03:06.120
<v Speaker 3>be a facilitator, a place where AI is built by others,

0:03:06.480 --> 0:03:09.320
<v Speaker 3>maybe not building so much generator of AI themselves. That's

0:03:09.360 --> 0:03:11.480
<v Speaker 3>the story you and I have told quite a lot

0:03:11.800 --> 0:03:13.120
<v Speaker 3>in recent weeks and months.

0:03:13.440 --> 0:03:15.240
<v Speaker 5>We are long shareholder letters.

0:03:15.400 --> 0:03:17.880
<v Speaker 4>Let's dig in with punam Call and BLUEBG Intelligence and

0:03:18.040 --> 0:03:20.919
<v Speaker 4>Ed just puts it so eloquently there. Ultimately, they want

0:03:20.919 --> 0:03:24.600
<v Speaker 4>to be at the very heart the infrastructure of generative AI. Yes,

0:03:24.639 --> 0:03:28.720
<v Speaker 4>they will build a substantial number of GENAI applications ourselves,

0:03:28.960 --> 0:03:30.280
<v Speaker 4>but they're looking to others to build.

0:03:31.600 --> 0:03:32.799
<v Speaker 6>Yes, you're absolutely right.

0:03:32.840 --> 0:03:35.920
<v Speaker 7>You know, right now Amazon lags Microsoft when it comes

0:03:35.960 --> 0:03:40.000
<v Speaker 7>to AI because Microsoft has access to the open AI. However,

0:03:40.200 --> 0:03:43.440
<v Speaker 7>as they build these building blocks going forward, they can

0:03:43.520 --> 0:03:46.160
<v Speaker 7>close that gap over time. So we think the investment

0:03:46.240 --> 0:03:48.680
<v Speaker 7>is right. We think the time is right, and generator

0:03:48.680 --> 0:03:51.280
<v Speaker 7>of AI will not only help fueld the AWS business,

0:03:51.320 --> 0:03:54.920
<v Speaker 7>but also it's e commerce marketplace business where it will

0:03:54.920 --> 0:03:56.600
<v Speaker 7>help drive sales higher.

0:03:57.920 --> 0:04:01.320
<v Speaker 3>Pun and what we're talking about specifically is I think

0:04:01.840 --> 0:04:03.720
<v Speaker 3>and you can go to Bedrock if you're a very

0:04:03.800 --> 0:04:08.000
<v Speaker 3>large enterprise player or a smaller startup and build your

0:04:08.040 --> 0:04:10.360
<v Speaker 3>own large language model, you can take advantage of a

0:04:10.400 --> 0:04:13.680
<v Speaker 3>third party large language model. Caroline and I have spoken

0:04:13.760 --> 0:04:18.200
<v Speaker 3>to Anthropic, for example Daniella m O'Day, and she talks

0:04:18.240 --> 0:04:18.760
<v Speaker 3>about all the.

0:04:18.720 --> 0:04:20.839
<v Speaker 6>Business they're winning through AWS.

0:04:20.839 --> 0:04:25.840
<v Speaker 3>Bedrock What I don't know is Amazon's cloud business AWS

0:04:25.920 --> 0:04:31.280
<v Speaker 3>actually gaining new customers, gaining growth or market share because

0:04:31.279 --> 0:04:32.880
<v Speaker 3>of their strategy with Bedrock.

0:04:33.960 --> 0:04:36.080
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, I think you know, over time they will gain

0:04:36.120 --> 0:04:38.880
<v Speaker 7>new customers. It's just a matter of getting these large

0:04:38.920 --> 0:04:42.800
<v Speaker 7>language models developed and them getting the customers interested. But

0:04:42.920 --> 0:04:45.960
<v Speaker 7>we do think their scope for Amazon to continue to

0:04:46.080 --> 0:04:47.239
<v Speaker 7>gain in that vertical.

0:04:48.080 --> 0:04:52.279
<v Speaker 4>What's interesting is well Google's event earlier this week, Cloud Event,

0:04:52.560 --> 0:04:54.880
<v Speaker 4>and they were really saying that it's startups that are

0:04:54.880 --> 0:04:59.400
<v Speaker 4>coming to them for cloud. How much, ultimately do companies.

0:04:59.120 --> 0:05:01.400
<v Speaker 5>Diversify, not go all in with one player.

0:05:02.720 --> 0:05:06.040
<v Speaker 7>I think diversification will happen across the board. It depends

0:05:06.160 --> 0:05:08.479
<v Speaker 7>on what you're using and where you want to be.

0:05:08.839 --> 0:05:11.760
<v Speaker 7>Amazon has done a great job in attracting not just

0:05:11.760 --> 0:05:14.440
<v Speaker 7>the startups but also established businesses, So.

0:05:14.400 --> 0:05:16.680
<v Speaker 5>We think the scope is wide.

0:05:16.960 --> 0:05:19.080
<v Speaker 7>We do think they're in the early innings of this,

0:05:19.480 --> 0:05:21.520
<v Speaker 7>and we do think right now they lag, but that

0:05:21.560 --> 0:05:23.440
<v Speaker 7>doesn't mean that they'll lag for a long time.

0:05:24.760 --> 0:05:25.880
<v Speaker 6>Let's talk about Andy Jesse.

0:05:26.440 --> 0:05:30.000
<v Speaker 3>He comes from AWS, that was his world, but the

0:05:30.120 --> 0:05:33.320
<v Speaker 3>story since he's taken the helm of Amazon has been

0:05:33.360 --> 0:05:37.039
<v Speaker 3>about cost discipline. In fact, don't even call it discipline pooa,

0:05:37.120 --> 0:05:40.200
<v Speaker 3>let's call it what it is, cutting cost lowering CAPEX.

0:05:40.480 --> 0:05:43.920
<v Speaker 3>And when I read the letter, he seems committed to that.

0:05:44.080 --> 0:05:46.400
<v Speaker 6>Still, yes, he does.

0:05:46.440 --> 0:05:49.440
<v Speaker 7>In fact, you know, they've been highlighting since last quarter

0:05:49.440 --> 0:05:52.600
<v Speaker 7>about the forty five cent reduction that they've had per

0:05:52.760 --> 0:05:55.560
<v Speaker 7>unit in their cost basis, and they think they can

0:05:55.600 --> 0:05:59.200
<v Speaker 7>press the pedal harder on that this year, largely as

0:05:59.240 --> 0:06:03.559
<v Speaker 7>they base GLEE streamline their inbound fulfillment, and they parse

0:06:03.600 --> 0:06:07.800
<v Speaker 7>out packages more efficiently to those regional distribution centers that

0:06:07.920 --> 0:06:09.440
<v Speaker 7>allow for SIND delivery.

0:06:11.200 --> 0:06:14.720
<v Speaker 3>Clunamgyle of Bloomberg Intelligence one of our analysts that leaves

0:06:14.760 --> 0:06:17.200
<v Speaker 3>coverage of this stock, and we're really grateful to have

0:06:17.279 --> 0:06:21.599
<v Speaker 3>you in reaction. Meanwhile, Amazon founder Jeff Bezos joined tech

0:06:21.640 --> 0:06:25.200
<v Speaker 3>heavyweights last night at the White House state dinner hosted

0:06:25.240 --> 0:06:30.000
<v Speaker 3>by President Biden for Japan's Prime Minister Fumiyo Kashida. Attendees

0:06:30.040 --> 0:06:35.840
<v Speaker 3>included Bezos's fiance Lawrence Sanchez, Apple CEO Tim Cook and

0:06:36.160 --> 0:06:40.120
<v Speaker 3>executive Lisa Jackson. Microsoft president Brad Smith was Intendants as

0:06:40.160 --> 0:06:43.880
<v Speaker 3>a well, and actor Robert de Niro. Even vent capitalists

0:06:44.040 --> 0:06:47.320
<v Speaker 3>including Robert Stavius of Bessemer Venture Partners. You also had

0:06:47.400 --> 0:06:52.520
<v Speaker 3>Jamie Diamond, Massa Sun and John Gray of Blackstone and Caro.

0:06:52.680 --> 0:06:56.920
<v Speaker 3>For me, the story is pretty clear here. Japan important

0:06:56.960 --> 0:07:00.440
<v Speaker 3>for technology and the economy and more.

0:07:00.360 --> 0:07:03.880
<v Speaker 4>Broadly for big get togethers of some important players, no

0:07:03.920 --> 0:07:05.800
<v Speaker 4>matter where they tend to be based. I mean, this

0:07:05.960 --> 0:07:09.880
<v Speaker 4>is where certain conversations had, deals are done. How many

0:07:09.920 --> 0:07:12.440
<v Speaker 4>are having intimate conversations with the Prime Minister of Japan.

0:07:12.560 --> 0:07:15.640
<v Speaker 4>But more broadly, I liked his Star Trek reference as well.

0:07:15.640 --> 0:07:17.920
<v Speaker 4>If you heard some of the commentary coming out of

0:07:17.920 --> 0:07:19.760
<v Speaker 4>the Leader of Japan, he was sort of going to

0:07:19.800 --> 0:07:22.320
<v Speaker 4>go boldly where no one has been before in terms

0:07:22.320 --> 0:07:24.440
<v Speaker 4>of deepening the US Japanese relationship.

0:07:24.440 --> 0:07:25.960
<v Speaker 5>But this is more broad, isn't as well?

0:07:26.000 --> 0:07:28.080
<v Speaker 4>I mean, there's a delightful menu that they managed to

0:07:28.080 --> 0:07:30.800
<v Speaker 4>be having triage Raby state not bad. But this is

0:07:30.840 --> 0:07:33.760
<v Speaker 4>also about deepening ties. But not just from an economic perspective.

0:07:33.800 --> 0:07:36.400
<v Speaker 4>We've got to think of this from a geopolitical perspective,

0:07:36.400 --> 0:07:38.520
<v Speaker 4>and notably what's happening with the Philippines coming in at

0:07:38.520 --> 0:07:41.240
<v Speaker 4>the moment, and indeed what this means for China US relations.

0:07:42.200 --> 0:07:45.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I go straight to China when the CEOs turn up.

0:07:45.440 --> 0:07:48.120
<v Speaker 3>You know that that market is important, right, whether it's

0:07:48.120 --> 0:07:50.440
<v Speaker 3>for supply chain or the economy direct.

0:07:50.480 --> 0:07:51.720
<v Speaker 6>So let's bring up menu back up.

0:07:51.760 --> 0:07:55.480
<v Speaker 3>That is contemporary modern American Japanese fusion.

0:07:56.400 --> 0:07:57.160
<v Speaker 6>That looks great.

0:07:57.720 --> 0:08:00.160
<v Speaker 3>But there's also a political element to this as well,

0:08:00.200 --> 0:08:02.440
<v Speaker 3>that Biden had a lot of big names in the

0:08:02.480 --> 0:08:03.960
<v Speaker 3>White House in an election year.

0:08:04.040 --> 0:08:07.400
<v Speaker 4>Character Yeah, I think that is really notable and ultimately

0:08:07.480 --> 0:08:10.560
<v Speaker 4>trying to ensure that the economy is what Biden can

0:08:10.560 --> 0:08:12.400
<v Speaker 4>hang his hat on as well. Many worrying about the

0:08:12.440 --> 0:08:15.480
<v Speaker 4>inflationary pressures that were garnered yesterday and they did what

0:08:15.480 --> 0:08:19.160
<v Speaker 4>this really means for Biden Bidenomics and the lack thereof

0:08:19.240 --> 0:08:22.400
<v Speaker 4>but tech heavyweight really clear and present when it comes

0:08:22.440 --> 0:08:24.120
<v Speaker 4>to relationships with US and Japan.

0:08:31.280 --> 0:08:32.080
<v Speaker 5>JP Morgan.

0:08:32.320 --> 0:08:34.959
<v Speaker 4>It kicks off earning season Banks they are at the

0:08:34.960 --> 0:08:37.480
<v Speaker 4>start of them hammers tomorrow and earlier this week. Just

0:08:37.520 --> 0:08:39.440
<v Speaker 4>remember we heard from the CEO Jamie Diamond in his

0:08:39.440 --> 0:08:42.880
<v Speaker 4>annual letter to shareholders where he focused mainly on artificial

0:08:42.960 --> 0:08:46.480
<v Speaker 4>intelligence joining us now to discuss how banksy utilizing the

0:08:46.520 --> 0:08:47.839
<v Speaker 4>technology investing in it.

0:08:48.200 --> 0:08:50.680
<v Speaker 5>Evidence CEO Alexandra was a Visita is with us.

0:08:50.760 --> 0:08:53.960
<v Speaker 4>Evidence is an intelligent platform that really benchmarks attracts AI

0:08:54.000 --> 0:08:56.360
<v Speaker 4>adoption across financial services sector.

0:08:56.280 --> 0:08:58.080
<v Speaker 5>And JP Morgan is the standout performer.

0:08:58.160 --> 0:09:00.840
<v Speaker 4>Alexandra, you think that's in some way akin to the

0:09:00.840 --> 0:09:01.680
<v Speaker 4>performance of the bank.

0:09:01.679 --> 0:09:04.720
<v Speaker 8>Can it stop more broadly, Yeah, well, thank you so

0:09:04.800 --> 0:09:07.319
<v Speaker 8>much for having me on Caroline and ED. But its

0:09:07.360 --> 0:09:12.480
<v Speaker 8>performance is incredibly strong in terms of its AI maturity,

0:09:12.679 --> 0:09:15.880
<v Speaker 8>its head and shoulders above other banks. It was early

0:09:15.920 --> 0:09:20.360
<v Speaker 8>to the game. Jamie Diamond made AI a focus for

0:09:20.400 --> 0:09:23.760
<v Speaker 8>the banks six years ago, where he made clear that

0:09:23.960 --> 0:09:27.120
<v Speaker 8>it was going to be an AI first organization and

0:09:27.200 --> 0:09:30.280
<v Speaker 8>from that followed a lot of initiatives like establishing a

0:09:30.320 --> 0:09:33.280
<v Speaker 8>research lab, you know, doubling down on hiring AI talent,

0:09:33.720 --> 0:09:37.400
<v Speaker 8>reorganizing the EXAC team, and that really has paid off

0:09:37.440 --> 0:09:40.760
<v Speaker 8>and you see, well, according to our measurements, you can

0:09:41.080 --> 0:09:43.559
<v Speaker 8>see that they sort of really stand out against other

0:09:43.600 --> 0:09:46.840
<v Speaker 8>banks and are incredibly strong on AI capabilities.

0:09:47.760 --> 0:09:51.400
<v Speaker 3>We've been looking at the data behind JP Morgan's AI hiring.

0:09:51.440 --> 0:09:53.959
<v Speaker 3>You just made a really interesting point, which is six

0:09:54.120 --> 0:09:55.960
<v Speaker 3>years ago this all started.

0:09:56.040 --> 0:09:56.880
<v Speaker 6>Let's show the chart.

0:09:57.800 --> 0:10:02.120
<v Speaker 3>There's the AI hype of twenty two, twenty twenty three,

0:10:02.600 --> 0:10:04.600
<v Speaker 3>but if you track the.

0:10:04.520 --> 0:10:05.920
<v Speaker 6>Hiring and what's so interesting.

0:10:05.960 --> 0:10:09.600
<v Speaker 3>The title of that chart is JP Morgan slows AI hiring.

0:10:10.000 --> 0:10:12.240
<v Speaker 3>But look how elevated it was in twenty twenty two

0:10:12.320 --> 0:10:15.600
<v Speaker 3>and it started back in twenty twenty. What do you

0:10:15.640 --> 0:10:18.600
<v Speaker 3>make of that about how ahead of the curve or not?

0:10:19.000 --> 0:10:20.520
<v Speaker 3>So to speak, JP Morgan.

0:10:20.280 --> 0:10:22.960
<v Speaker 8>Is Yeah, I mean, I mean, first of all, it's

0:10:22.960 --> 0:10:25.080
<v Speaker 8>a really important point that you make it in terms

0:10:25.120 --> 0:10:29.679
<v Speaker 8>of the hype in twenty two and twenty three of

0:10:29.720 --> 0:10:32.720
<v Speaker 8>AI and sort of what we're heading into is more

0:10:32.720 --> 0:10:35.360
<v Speaker 8>of a let's sort of see what gets through production.

0:10:35.440 --> 0:10:36.479
<v Speaker 2>It's much harder.

0:10:36.240 --> 0:10:38.440
<v Speaker 8>Than we think, and sort of the use cases going

0:10:38.480 --> 0:10:43.360
<v Speaker 8>from ideation to production just takes a little longer, and

0:10:43.400 --> 0:10:45.720
<v Speaker 8>some of that slow down and hiring is also a

0:10:45.720 --> 0:10:49.679
<v Speaker 8>little bit of a let's what talent do we actually need?

0:10:49.760 --> 0:10:52.000
<v Speaker 8>But when you look at that chart, you can see

0:10:52.040 --> 0:10:55.640
<v Speaker 8>that really being on a hiring tear from for the

0:10:55.679 --> 0:10:58.880
<v Speaker 8>last sort of six seven years. And you know, the

0:10:59.400 --> 0:11:02.720
<v Speaker 8>proportion of AI talent and the caliber of AI talent

0:11:02.800 --> 0:11:05.920
<v Speaker 8>in the bank is second to none. So right now

0:11:05.920 --> 0:11:07.920
<v Speaker 8>a lot of the banks are looking at like where

0:11:08.080 --> 0:11:11.240
<v Speaker 8>you know, the onset of using you know, genitive AI,

0:11:11.840 --> 0:11:14.240
<v Speaker 8>Where are we using it in the bank? Which which

0:11:14.280 --> 0:11:17.200
<v Speaker 8>platforms are we going to use, whether it's open AI

0:11:17.360 --> 0:11:20.360
<v Speaker 8>or Mistral or hugging face, which one of those, How

0:11:20.400 --> 0:11:23.160
<v Speaker 8>does it fit into our particular needs and how do

0:11:23.240 --> 0:11:25.920
<v Speaker 8>we refine it so so it gives us the best

0:11:25.920 --> 0:11:29.600
<v Speaker 8>output possible. So there is a bit of a let's

0:11:29.600 --> 0:11:32.200
<v Speaker 8>see what we can use internally of our AI talent

0:11:32.280 --> 0:11:36.240
<v Speaker 8>that can you know, can help us, you know, refine

0:11:36.240 --> 0:11:39.040
<v Speaker 8>that and before we sort of accelerate again, uh, and

0:11:39.080 --> 0:11:41.920
<v Speaker 8>think about what we hire externally. But it should should

0:11:41.920 --> 0:11:44.840
<v Speaker 8>also be noted that when you sort of look across

0:11:44.840 --> 0:11:48.920
<v Speaker 8>the banking sector, even the banks that have cut employees

0:11:49.320 --> 0:11:51.679
<v Speaker 8>have sort of tried to keep the AI talent sort

0:11:51.679 --> 0:11:53.440
<v Speaker 8>of relatively steady, if not increasing.

0:11:53.960 --> 0:11:56.760
<v Speaker 4>Talking of talent, of course, within that shareholder letter was

0:11:57.320 --> 0:12:00.720
<v Speaker 4>the demonstration and their commitment to elevating almost exs level

0:12:00.720 --> 0:12:04.120
<v Speaker 4>the discussion around AI, and they mention the importance in

0:12:04.160 --> 0:12:07.240
<v Speaker 4>creating that new position Chief Data and Analytics Officer that

0:12:07.280 --> 0:12:09.880
<v Speaker 4>sits in the operating committee. That person over at JP

0:12:09.960 --> 0:12:13.000
<v Speaker 4>Morgan is indeed Teresa heightens Ritter, who I was lucky

0:12:13.080 --> 0:12:16.000
<v Speaker 4>enough to speak to at an evident event, and it's

0:12:16.320 --> 0:12:19.360
<v Speaker 4>notable that she has been galvanizing the focus on sort

0:12:19.360 --> 0:12:22.920
<v Speaker 4>of from top down ensuring that all talent are online

0:12:22.960 --> 0:12:27.040
<v Speaker 4>with where AI can really bring about a change in productivity,

0:12:27.280 --> 0:12:29.400
<v Speaker 4>Where are they seeing it and drive down in costs?

0:12:29.400 --> 0:12:31.640
<v Speaker 5>Where are they passing this on to the user of

0:12:31.720 --> 0:12:32.720
<v Speaker 5>JP Morgan.

0:12:32.600 --> 0:12:34.400
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, when it comes to well, first of all, when

0:12:34.400 --> 0:12:39.319
<v Speaker 8>it comes to driving the use of AI and where

0:12:39.320 --> 0:12:41.360
<v Speaker 8>you sort of look at the letter as really talking

0:12:41.400 --> 0:12:45.440
<v Speaker 8>about gaining efficiencies and really making the banks sort of

0:12:45.480 --> 0:12:50.400
<v Speaker 8>strong and lean and robust forwithstanding sort of any macro

0:12:51.559 --> 0:12:54.760
<v Speaker 8>challenges on you know, in the future, So looking at

0:12:54.880 --> 0:12:57.800
<v Speaker 8>driving down the costs and bringing up efficiency and bringing

0:12:57.880 --> 0:13:02.320
<v Speaker 8>up productivity, and AI being used to also see where

0:13:02.360 --> 0:13:04.319
<v Speaker 8>you can elevate revenues.

0:13:04.960 --> 0:13:08.000
<v Speaker 5>Is it's whereas that it's sort of.

0:13:07.960 --> 0:13:10.400
<v Speaker 8>In every newk and cranny of the bank looking at

0:13:10.440 --> 0:13:12.600
<v Speaker 8>sort of the ways that it can create that return

0:13:12.360 --> 0:13:16.480
<v Speaker 8>on investment. And then you know, with the AI tools

0:13:16.520 --> 0:13:19.680
<v Speaker 8>that then gets passed on to the customer and you

0:13:19.679 --> 0:13:26.040
<v Speaker 8>know in better customer management, you know experiences if time and.

0:13:27.440 --> 0:13:30.719
<v Speaker 3>To Alexandra, do you think Jamie Diamond has a good

0:13:30.840 --> 0:13:32.720
<v Speaker 3>understanding of artificial intelligence?

0:13:32.760 --> 0:13:33.960
<v Speaker 6>He himself, he is.

0:13:34.040 --> 0:13:36.680
<v Speaker 8>Nick He saw it very early. He knew it was

0:13:36.679 --> 0:13:39.440
<v Speaker 8>going to be very impactful. He was one of the

0:13:39.480 --> 0:13:43.600
<v Speaker 8>first CEOs bank CEOs to go out and and say

0:13:43.640 --> 0:13:46.200
<v Speaker 8>we are changing. We are going to be an AI

0:13:46.640 --> 0:13:49.880
<v Speaker 8>company or an AI first company, where many banks would

0:13:49.880 --> 0:13:51.920
<v Speaker 8>be we're going to be great banks and using AI

0:13:52.040 --> 0:13:54.520
<v Speaker 8>to become a little bit better bank. He was a

0:13:54.600 --> 0:13:57.119
<v Speaker 8>visionary with that. I think he has a good understanding.

0:13:57.200 --> 0:13:59.640
<v Speaker 3>Yes, he's more upbeat about it than he is about Bitcoin.

0:13:59.679 --> 0:14:02.880
<v Speaker 3>Alex and Mussa Visita. It's great to have you, of evident.

0:14:02.960 --> 0:14:06.320
<v Speaker 3>Of course, now EU's top tech regulator, Margareta ves Thea

0:14:06.440 --> 0:14:10.400
<v Speaker 3>says AI could be as disruptive as the atomic bomb.

0:14:11.000 --> 0:14:13.920
<v Speaker 3>The Executive Vice President of the European Commission joined Bloomberg

0:14:13.960 --> 0:14:16.480
<v Speaker 3>earlier today to talk about the current state of AI.

0:14:17.679 --> 0:14:19.760
<v Speaker 9>It's top of mind for us to make sure that

0:14:19.960 --> 0:14:25.760
<v Speaker 9>the market stays competitive. When everything gets fueled by artificial intelligence,

0:14:25.960 --> 0:14:27.440
<v Speaker 9>it's going to change the marketplace.

0:14:28.080 --> 0:14:30.080
<v Speaker 10>Do you have a timeline at all, Commissioner, when we

0:14:30.120 --> 0:14:31.200
<v Speaker 10>could potentially see.

0:14:31.040 --> 0:14:31.760
<v Speaker 11>Some movement on this.

0:14:32.720 --> 0:14:34.320
<v Speaker 6>No, we don't have a fixed timeline.

0:14:34.960 --> 0:14:37.520
<v Speaker 9>Of course, we want to produce results as fast as possible,

0:14:37.560 --> 0:14:41.680
<v Speaker 9>also for the involved companies for their benefit. We'll be

0:14:41.760 --> 0:14:43.560
<v Speaker 9>getting there soon, I think.

0:14:43.880 --> 0:14:46.720
<v Speaker 12>So we're talking about Microsoft and open Ai, but of

0:14:46.760 --> 0:14:48.880
<v Speaker 12>course they're not the only players. To hear, you have

0:14:49.080 --> 0:14:53.520
<v Speaker 12>Amazon actually with a big almost three billion dollar investment

0:14:53.640 --> 0:14:57.080
<v Speaker 12>into Anthropic, which of course competes with OpenAI.

0:14:57.600 --> 0:14:58.360
<v Speaker 11>What do you make of that?

0:14:58.560 --> 0:15:00.200
<v Speaker 12>Is that something that you're looking at as well?

0:15:00.720 --> 0:15:04.360
<v Speaker 9>Well? We will be having, you know, a vigilant, keen

0:15:04.440 --> 0:15:09.720
<v Speaker 9>attention to what is happening in this field. We see

0:15:09.720 --> 0:15:12.520
<v Speaker 9>a lot of entrenched market power when it comes to technology,

0:15:12.960 --> 0:15:16.000
<v Speaker 9>and it's really important that now when we have technology

0:15:16.080 --> 0:15:19.080
<v Speaker 9>which is not just a new technology, it's it's basically

0:15:19.120 --> 0:15:22.400
<v Speaker 9>a new world that we're looking into, that we make

0:15:22.440 --> 0:15:24.920
<v Speaker 9>sure that it's a competitive new world.

0:15:26.000 --> 0:15:29.480
<v Speaker 10>You just recently under the DMA went after three big

0:15:29.800 --> 0:15:32.680
<v Speaker 10>US tech companies, and to be honest, Commissioner, three is

0:15:32.720 --> 0:15:34.960
<v Speaker 10>a crowd. I'm really curious to know which of these

0:15:35.240 --> 0:15:37.080
<v Speaker 10>you are honing in on. And because a lot of

0:15:37.120 --> 0:15:39.320
<v Speaker 10>people really seem to think it's Apple, where the EU

0:15:39.400 --> 0:15:40.400
<v Speaker 10>has a lot of problems with.

0:15:41.360 --> 0:15:44.240
<v Speaker 9>Well, what's the point of the Digital Markets Act is

0:15:44.320 --> 0:15:46.520
<v Speaker 9>to open the market to make sure that that more

0:15:46.600 --> 0:15:49.200
<v Speaker 9>businesses can can get to their customers so customers have

0:15:49.320 --> 0:15:55.320
<v Speaker 9>more choice. So obviously we are looking at getting out

0:15:55.440 --> 0:15:58.160
<v Speaker 9>of self preferencing so that you do not if your

0:15:58.160 --> 0:15:59.880
<v Speaker 9>for instance, have a Google search and you do not

0:16:00.120 --> 0:16:03.040
<v Speaker 9>just get a Google products. And we're looking at how

0:16:03.120 --> 0:16:06.600
<v Speaker 9>businesses can get a real relationship with their customers. So

0:16:06.800 --> 0:16:09.800
<v Speaker 9>to get rid of the ends is staring that we

0:16:09.880 --> 0:16:12.280
<v Speaker 9>see quite a lot and people have choice is they

0:16:12.320 --> 0:16:14.880
<v Speaker 9>want to stay in the Apple payment environment or they

0:16:14.960 --> 0:16:18.560
<v Speaker 9>want to have a direct and sometimes cheaper relationship with

0:16:18.640 --> 0:16:19.600
<v Speaker 9>their service provider.

0:16:20.120 --> 0:16:22.760
<v Speaker 12>Well among those three Apple, Google and Meta, do you

0:16:22.840 --> 0:16:24.160
<v Speaker 12>have a priority target?

0:16:24.680 --> 0:16:27.000
<v Speaker 9>Well, we have opened these five cases because we think

0:16:27.200 --> 0:16:28.480
<v Speaker 9>these are very important.

0:16:29.160 --> 0:16:30.440
<v Speaker 11>We may have more cases in the.

0:16:30.440 --> 0:16:34.280
<v Speaker 9>Pipeline, so we have given retaining orders for what may

0:16:34.320 --> 0:16:39.040
<v Speaker 9>be evidence once we're moving forward. These five cases, they

0:16:39.080 --> 0:16:42.360
<v Speaker 9>are all priority. We think that they are absolutely key

0:16:43.080 --> 0:16:48.160
<v Speaker 9>if our suspicions are confirmed that we get compliance because

0:16:48.200 --> 0:16:50.800
<v Speaker 9>this is this is what opens the market, and that's

0:16:50.840 --> 0:16:53.600
<v Speaker 9>the basic idea. Are the Digital Markets Act for many

0:16:53.640 --> 0:16:55.480
<v Speaker 9>more businesses to have a fair chance to get to

0:16:55.560 --> 0:16:56.240
<v Speaker 9>their customers.

0:17:06.920 --> 0:17:08.760
<v Speaker 6>Okay, time for talking tech and first up.

0:17:08.880 --> 0:17:11.680
<v Speaker 3>KKR is said to be reviewing options of a sale

0:17:11.880 --> 0:17:15.480
<v Speaker 3>or an IPO for BMC software, which could be worth

0:17:15.720 --> 0:17:19.479
<v Speaker 3>as much as fifteen billion dollars including debt. That's according

0:17:19.520 --> 0:17:23.160
<v Speaker 3>to sources. While no final decisions have been made, KKR

0:17:23.280 --> 0:17:26.920
<v Speaker 3>is favoring an IPO of BMC, which filed confidentially last

0:17:27.000 --> 0:17:30.640
<v Speaker 3>year with the SEC for a listing. Plus French chip

0:17:30.720 --> 0:17:34.040
<v Speaker 3>materials company Seutech is said to be considering building a

0:17:34.240 --> 0:17:37.159
<v Speaker 3>factory in the United States, following in the footsteps of

0:17:37.240 --> 0:17:40.719
<v Speaker 3>one of its biggest customers, TSMC, as it expands from

0:17:40.800 --> 0:17:45.159
<v Speaker 3>Arizona to Texas. With government incentives, The consideration would mean

0:17:45.200 --> 0:17:49.720
<v Speaker 3>that Stech would add to its global factory facilities alongside Singapore, Belgium,

0:17:49.720 --> 0:17:53.000
<v Speaker 3>and France, and positions the company for growth outside of

0:17:53.119 --> 0:17:56.760
<v Speaker 3>China and Saudi Arabia and the UAE are racing for

0:17:56.880 --> 0:18:01.440
<v Speaker 3>AI dominance, rushing to build out expensive data center infrastructure

0:18:01.720 --> 0:18:05.040
<v Speaker 3>to help support the technology. Both countries lag behind Western

0:18:05.080 --> 0:18:08.359
<v Speaker 3>Europe in terms of data center capacity, with hopes of

0:18:08.440 --> 0:18:09.800
<v Speaker 3>closing that gap in.

0:18:09.880 --> 0:18:10.520
<v Speaker 11>A few years.

0:18:10.600 --> 0:18:13.840
<v Speaker 3>In a recent report by PwC, it estimated that AI

0:18:13.960 --> 0:18:17.680
<v Speaker 3>will contribute nearly ninety six billion dollars to the UAE

0:18:18.080 --> 0:18:21.359
<v Speaker 3>and one hundred and thirty five billion to Saudi Arabia's

0:18:21.400 --> 0:18:23.200
<v Speaker 3>economy by twenty thirty.

0:18:23.359 --> 0:18:25.359
<v Speaker 5>Caroline That was a great business sweep piece.

0:18:25.440 --> 0:18:28.080
<v Speaker 4>Meanwhile, let's just talk about employees over in an Apple

0:18:28.119 --> 0:18:32.200
<v Speaker 4>store in Shorthills, New Jersey, just petitioned to unionize. It's

0:18:32.200 --> 0:18:33.600
<v Speaker 4>marking the first lutch effort that we've seen it in

0:18:33.640 --> 0:18:36.760
<v Speaker 4>about a year long lull of news around this. Bloomberg's

0:18:36.760 --> 0:18:39.080
<v Speaker 4>Mark German just going to remind us of the context

0:18:39.119 --> 0:18:41.000
<v Speaker 4>when it comes to Apple, because they're not the first

0:18:41.040 --> 0:18:42.440
<v Speaker 4>store that's looking to unionize.

0:18:42.720 --> 0:18:44.240
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, no, that's a great point.

0:18:44.400 --> 0:18:48.280
<v Speaker 14>The Apple unionization efforts really kicked into high gear right

0:18:48.320 --> 0:18:48.480
<v Speaker 14>in the.

0:18:48.480 --> 0:18:51.080
<v Speaker 13>Middle of the COVID pandemic. In twenty twenty two.

0:18:51.600 --> 0:18:54.560
<v Speaker 14>You saw their retail store in the Towson area of

0:18:54.640 --> 0:18:56.919
<v Speaker 14>Maryland petition to unionize.

0:18:56.960 --> 0:18:58.440
<v Speaker 13>They successfully unionized.

0:18:58.480 --> 0:19:02.760
<v Speaker 14>Are now recognize is a unionized Apple retail store. The

0:19:02.920 --> 0:19:07.040
<v Speaker 14>Penn Station store and a mall in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma

0:19:07.240 --> 0:19:09.360
<v Speaker 14>is a unionized store. So those two are the only

0:19:09.400 --> 0:19:11.439
<v Speaker 14>two unionized stores. But there have been a few other

0:19:11.520 --> 0:19:15.520
<v Speaker 14>stores that attempted, one in Saint Louis, Missouri, one in Atlanta, Georgia.

0:19:16.080 --> 0:19:17.040
<v Speaker 13>Those fell apart.

0:19:17.320 --> 0:19:21.000
<v Speaker 14>One of those unions even chastised the union company and

0:19:21.440 --> 0:19:24.160
<v Speaker 14>ended up siding with Apple. Now you have another store

0:19:24.240 --> 0:19:26.639
<v Speaker 14>joining in and that is the Short Hills mall store

0:19:27.280 --> 0:19:30.440
<v Speaker 14>and upscale area in New Jersey. And at this point

0:19:30.520 --> 0:19:33.040
<v Speaker 14>it's still early. They've petitioned, they have one hundred and

0:19:33.040 --> 0:19:35.239
<v Speaker 14>four employees that would be part of the union. There

0:19:35.320 --> 0:19:37.000
<v Speaker 14>still needs to be a vote. They still need to

0:19:37.040 --> 0:19:38.679
<v Speaker 14>get to the bargaining table with Apple.

0:19:39.320 --> 0:19:40.400
<v Speaker 13>But this is the process.

0:19:40.480 --> 0:19:44.200
<v Speaker 14>And so this was a major development petitioning publicly stating hey,

0:19:44.680 --> 0:19:45.960
<v Speaker 14>we are trying to unionize.

0:19:46.040 --> 0:19:48.480
<v Speaker 13>So this is a big deal. The fifth store that

0:19:48.600 --> 0:19:49.960
<v Speaker 13>we know of to attempt.

0:19:50.080 --> 0:19:52.560
<v Speaker 3>They are trying to unionize. This is a path trodden

0:19:52.600 --> 0:19:54.639
<v Speaker 3>by Amazon. You know, Caroline and I've kind of been

0:19:54.680 --> 0:19:57.119
<v Speaker 3>through a similar story arc with that company.

0:19:57.720 --> 0:19:59.760
<v Speaker 6>But I guess the next question.

0:19:59.640 --> 0:20:03.720
<v Speaker 3>At all smart, what is Apple's attitude towards unionization the

0:20:03.800 --> 0:20:05.000
<v Speaker 3>company's approach.

0:20:05.200 --> 0:20:08.160
<v Speaker 14>Well, the company is completely against unionization. They've been holding

0:20:08.240 --> 0:20:11.960
<v Speaker 14>roundtables at the Short Hills, New Jersey store for months

0:20:12.000 --> 0:20:15.960
<v Speaker 14>now pushing back on the idea of that team unionizing.

0:20:16.040 --> 0:20:19.480
<v Speaker 14>They don't want to have to change their perks, their benefits,

0:20:19.560 --> 0:20:22.320
<v Speaker 14>their pay strategy. You know, Apple is a company that

0:20:22.400 --> 0:20:25.520
<v Speaker 14>wants things to be consistent and completely under their control.

0:20:26.080 --> 0:20:27.639
<v Speaker 13>Unionization upsets that.

0:20:27.880 --> 0:20:31.080
<v Speaker 14>Finely tuned balance the company has enjoyed for as long

0:20:31.160 --> 0:20:34.000
<v Speaker 14>as it has under Tim Cook and Steve Jobs before him,

0:20:34.520 --> 0:20:37.440
<v Speaker 14>So certainly this is not something that Apple wants. I

0:20:37.560 --> 0:20:40.320
<v Speaker 14>think they're fairly happy that out of the two hundred

0:20:40.359 --> 0:20:43.359
<v Speaker 14>and seventy and change retail stores in the US, only

0:20:43.480 --> 0:20:46.640
<v Speaker 14>two have successfully unionized, and of those two, they haven't

0:20:46.640 --> 0:20:47.320
<v Speaker 14>given them anything.

0:20:47.480 --> 0:20:49.840
<v Speaker 6>Blamebak's chief correspondent Motgum and thank you.

0:20:58.680 --> 0:21:01.239
<v Speaker 3>Welcome back to blame Bags ten Lovelow here in San

0:21:01.280 --> 0:21:03.080
<v Speaker 3>Francisco and Caroline Heid and New York.

0:21:03.119 --> 0:21:04.560
<v Speaker 4>I've got to check on the markets for you, Ed,

0:21:04.600 --> 0:21:07.320
<v Speaker 4>because right now, no, we're actually seeing NAZAC and tech

0:21:07.359 --> 0:21:09.920
<v Speaker 4>stocks outperform on a day where bon yields are still

0:21:09.960 --> 0:21:11.760
<v Speaker 4>selling off on the end of the curve, so ten

0:21:11.800 --> 0:21:13.840
<v Speaker 4>yure yields are seeing four basis points to the higher.

0:21:14.040 --> 0:21:14.840
<v Speaker 5>We are still trying to.

0:21:14.840 --> 0:21:18.240
<v Speaker 4>Debate the inflatory pressures we have PPI today, CPI yesterday,

0:21:18.640 --> 0:21:20.840
<v Speaker 4>still showing inflation is kind of going the wrong direction

0:21:20.920 --> 0:21:23.960
<v Speaker 4>for the Federal Reserve. If banking on a cup come June,

0:21:24.280 --> 0:21:26.560
<v Speaker 4>people starting to take those bets off the table. We're

0:21:26.560 --> 0:21:28.560
<v Speaker 4>seeing Bitcoin under pressure just by two tens percent, where

0:21:28.560 --> 0:21:29.359
<v Speaker 4>of sixty nine thousand s.

0:21:29.400 --> 0:21:30.240
<v Speaker 5>It's around sixty five.

0:21:30.280 --> 0:21:32.879
<v Speaker 4>We're basically kind of treading water ahead of earning season

0:21:32.920 --> 0:21:35.359
<v Speaker 4>as well, the banks kicking off tomorrow. Moving on to

0:21:35.400 --> 0:21:37.480
<v Speaker 4>some individual movers, I mean interesting on the upside, A

0:21:37.520 --> 0:21:40.359
<v Speaker 4>lot of the key names are used to Nvidia, Apple, indeed,

0:21:40.640 --> 0:21:42.919
<v Speaker 4>even Amazon and a new record high today after its

0:21:43.119 --> 0:21:43.880
<v Speaker 4>shareholder letter.

0:21:43.960 --> 0:21:45.439
<v Speaker 5>I want to shine on an Atlassian.

0:21:45.480 --> 0:21:47.879
<v Speaker 4>It's getting an upgrade from analysts thinking that now is

0:21:47.920 --> 0:21:50.359
<v Speaker 4>the time to be buying into this enterprise focus software company.

0:21:50.440 --> 0:21:53.560
<v Speaker 5>So up more than three percent. Tesla though once again languishing,

0:21:53.640 --> 0:21:54.040
<v Speaker 5>pulling back.

0:21:54.080 --> 0:21:56.560
<v Speaker 4>In fact, you noted that Rivian shares performing as much

0:21:56.560 --> 0:21:58.879
<v Speaker 4>as seven percent to a record lows. Some reports that

0:21:58.960 --> 0:22:02.400
<v Speaker 4>Ford is cutting its evil prices. Elon Musk apparently looking

0:22:02.400 --> 0:22:05.280
<v Speaker 4>at India. Maybe we'll get some updates on supply and

0:22:05.640 --> 0:22:08.080
<v Speaker 4>in team demand coming from that country. Adobe, though, want

0:22:08.160 --> 0:22:11.520
<v Speaker 4>to watch interesting reporting coming out on basically how expensive

0:22:11.640 --> 0:22:14.919
<v Speaker 4>it is sometimes to be training your large language models

0:22:14.920 --> 0:22:18.520
<v Speaker 4>and text to video in particular, and where you're getting

0:22:18.600 --> 0:22:19.640
<v Speaker 4>some of those videos from.

0:22:19.880 --> 0:22:20.880
<v Speaker 5>We want to dig in on Nado.

0:22:20.960 --> 0:22:23.040
<v Speaker 4>We've just done a pressure by about percentage point today,

0:22:23.280 --> 0:22:25.000
<v Speaker 4>but looking like it is really trying to take on

0:22:25.040 --> 0:22:27.600
<v Speaker 4>the likes of Saura. Of course open aiyes product when

0:22:27.640 --> 0:22:30.600
<v Speaker 4>it comes to AI video generation, apparently offering it's network

0:22:30.640 --> 0:22:32.560
<v Speaker 4>of photographers and artists get this one hundred and twenty

0:22:32.600 --> 0:22:36.720
<v Speaker 4>dollars to submit videos of people engaged in everyday actions, walking,

0:22:36.840 --> 0:22:41.400
<v Speaker 4>expressing emotions, joy, anger, according to documents all seen by Bloomberg.

0:22:41.480 --> 0:22:43.760
<v Speaker 4>Let's just get more of our own reporter Brady Ford,

0:22:43.800 --> 0:22:46.159
<v Speaker 4>who helped break this story. And it is notable that

0:22:46.200 --> 0:22:47.880
<v Speaker 4>they're playing a bit of catch up here with text

0:22:47.920 --> 0:22:50.280
<v Speaker 4>to video. But where they don't have to play so

0:22:50.400 --> 0:22:53.200
<v Speaker 4>much catch up is where they train their data.

0:22:53.280 --> 0:22:54.879
<v Speaker 5>You'd have thought, but maybe they have to pay a

0:22:54.880 --> 0:22:55.280
<v Speaker 5>bit extra.

0:22:55.880 --> 0:22:57.240
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, it's a funny dynamic.

0:22:57.359 --> 0:23:00.880
<v Speaker 15>So they have this giant repository of they've been using

0:23:00.960 --> 0:23:04.080
<v Speaker 15>to train their photos. They got like three hundred million photos,

0:23:04.359 --> 0:23:06.359
<v Speaker 15>not as big of a deal when it comes to

0:23:06.440 --> 0:23:08.399
<v Speaker 15>the video. They don't have quite as much of that

0:23:08.480 --> 0:23:10.600
<v Speaker 15>in the stock libraries. So we see now that they're

0:23:10.600 --> 0:23:12.960
<v Speaker 15>starting to procure data to be able to train on.

0:23:13.640 --> 0:23:15.879
<v Speaker 15>And it's really funny kind of videos, right. It's like

0:23:16.560 --> 0:23:19.680
<v Speaker 15>some of the sample videos is people smiling, people frowning,

0:23:19.880 --> 0:23:23.000
<v Speaker 15>picking up weights, right, training these AI models on how

0:23:23.040 --> 0:23:24.720
<v Speaker 15>people really interact with the world.

0:23:24.920 --> 0:23:26.280
<v Speaker 5>I like them thing we're all really fit.

0:23:26.720 --> 0:23:28.480
<v Speaker 15>Yes, they think we're all very fit, or they don't

0:23:28.480 --> 0:23:29.719
<v Speaker 15>even have any videos of us doing it so they

0:23:29.760 --> 0:23:32.399
<v Speaker 15>know we're not right. But yeah, so they really need

0:23:32.480 --> 0:23:35.200
<v Speaker 15>these videos to help their model understand how the world

0:23:35.320 --> 0:23:37.040
<v Speaker 15>works and so that they can, you know, not get

0:23:37.080 --> 0:23:38.280
<v Speaker 15>smoked by open AI.

0:23:39.840 --> 0:23:44.800
<v Speaker 3>Mate two dollars sixty two cents per minute or as

0:23:44.880 --> 0:23:48.440
<v Speaker 3>high as seven dollars five cents per minute, based on

0:23:48.520 --> 0:23:52.360
<v Speaker 3>your reporting good reporting. If you're the CFO or COO

0:23:52.600 --> 0:23:56.720
<v Speaker 3>of Adobe, and that's before you facturing compute costs, you're

0:23:56.800 --> 0:24:00.600
<v Speaker 3>not going to be thrilled about the cost of training

0:24:00.640 --> 0:24:04.080
<v Speaker 3>a model like the Economic Sphere are actually newsworthy.

0:24:04.160 --> 0:24:05.040
<v Speaker 6>This is a surprise.

0:24:05.800 --> 0:24:09.359
<v Speaker 15>So it's not quite as high as it may sound like, right,

0:24:09.400 --> 0:24:12.679
<v Speaker 15>because it's one hundred and twenty dollars for one hundred

0:24:12.760 --> 0:24:13.520
<v Speaker 15>short videos.

0:24:13.640 --> 0:24:13.760
<v Speaker 9>Right.

0:24:13.840 --> 0:24:15.880
<v Speaker 11>I was trying to do the math of if I wanted.

0:24:15.680 --> 0:24:17.680
<v Speaker 15>To create this, it's going to take you a good

0:24:17.840 --> 0:24:21.600
<v Speaker 15>five six hours to make all these videos doing push ups,

0:24:21.680 --> 0:24:25.200
<v Speaker 15>then cooking and smiling and frowning. I mean, the actual

0:24:25.240 --> 0:24:27.440
<v Speaker 15>amount they're paying ends up being pretty low. And you

0:24:27.520 --> 0:24:30.159
<v Speaker 15>could say that all. I mean, they could scrape the

0:24:30.240 --> 0:24:33.280
<v Speaker 15>open Internet for free, but we know that there are

0:24:33.359 --> 0:24:36.679
<v Speaker 15>issues there with tagging the videos correctly getting the exact

0:24:36.760 --> 0:24:39.399
<v Speaker 15>quality you need. So I mean these are things they

0:24:39.480 --> 0:24:41.639
<v Speaker 15>might need to procure once, but they can continue to

0:24:41.720 --> 0:24:44.480
<v Speaker 15>train on. So, Yes, it is a material amount of

0:24:44.560 --> 0:24:47.960
<v Speaker 15>money in the grand scheme. It's not like they're selling

0:24:48.000 --> 0:24:49.920
<v Speaker 15>out a ton to every creator though.

0:24:51.200 --> 0:24:53.879
<v Speaker 4>I mean all of this comes within the context of

0:24:54.640 --> 0:24:57.360
<v Speaker 4>Sora and where it got data, right, yeah.

0:24:57.480 --> 0:24:57.600
<v Speaker 13>Right.

0:24:57.760 --> 0:25:01.600
<v Speaker 15>We also have that viral clip of the open Aic saying, oh,

0:25:01.760 --> 0:25:03.680
<v Speaker 15>we don't know where it was trained, but right, we

0:25:03.720 --> 0:25:05.480
<v Speaker 15>all kind of know where it was trained, right, And

0:25:05.520 --> 0:25:08.360
<v Speaker 15>I mean that's been Adoby's whole marketing pitch that we're

0:25:08.440 --> 0:25:10.080
<v Speaker 15>going to try to do things the right way.

0:25:10.240 --> 0:25:12.320
<v Speaker 11>We're going to only use sources that we have true

0:25:12.400 --> 0:25:13.000
<v Speaker 11>access to.

0:25:13.480 --> 0:25:15.560
<v Speaker 5>You're not going to get done in the courts. Basically,

0:25:15.600 --> 0:25:16.400
<v Speaker 5>you're going to get sued.

0:25:16.400 --> 0:25:16.600
<v Speaker 13>You're not.

0:25:16.920 --> 0:25:19.520
<v Speaker 15>They literally say, yeah, if you get sued, we're going

0:25:19.600 --> 0:25:20.119
<v Speaker 15>to be there with you.

0:25:20.200 --> 0:25:21.800
<v Speaker 11>We'll see you in court, we'll back you up.

0:25:22.760 --> 0:25:25.080
<v Speaker 15>Will that end up holding them back? Will that end

0:25:25.160 --> 0:25:27.520
<v Speaker 15>up casting more than it needs to? It is yet

0:25:27.600 --> 0:25:30.520
<v Speaker 15>to be seen. But that's at least their public message

0:25:30.520 --> 0:25:31.000
<v Speaker 15>at this time.

0:25:32.200 --> 0:25:34.240
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg's Brady Ford, I think you're always on top of

0:25:34.280 --> 0:25:36.960
<v Speaker 3>it when it comes to Adobe, Thank you now. Open

0:25:37.040 --> 0:25:40.720
<v Speaker 3>AI CEO Sam Outman has been working to build a

0:25:40.840 --> 0:25:46.000
<v Speaker 3>global coalition among government and industry leaders to support boosting

0:25:46.080 --> 0:25:50.040
<v Speaker 3>the supply of chips, energy and data center capacity that's

0:25:50.119 --> 0:25:54.080
<v Speaker 3>needed to develop artificial intelligence technology. That's according to our

0:25:54.160 --> 0:25:57.399
<v Speaker 3>sources and Bloomberg Shreen Gafari broke that story with me

0:25:57.960 --> 0:25:59.919
<v Speaker 3>and joined me on set. This is kind of an

0:26:00.000 --> 0:26:03.000
<v Speaker 3>evolution of our existing reporting, right. It started with this

0:26:03.200 --> 0:26:06.400
<v Speaker 3>idea that Sam Outman was worried about the supply long

0:26:06.560 --> 0:26:10.560
<v Speaker 3>term of AI accelerators or the GPUs, the train models,

0:26:10.880 --> 0:26:13.240
<v Speaker 3>and later inference it's bigger.

0:26:13.320 --> 0:26:15.600
<v Speaker 6>Now, just recap for audience what.

0:26:15.640 --> 0:26:18.360
<v Speaker 16>You and I have learned, right, So we know now

0:26:18.600 --> 0:26:22.680
<v Speaker 16>that Sam Maltman has been in the UAE this week

0:26:23.080 --> 0:26:26.840
<v Speaker 16>meeting with government officials, with investors, and the pitch is

0:26:26.920 --> 0:26:29.720
<v Speaker 16>to build some kind of global coalition that goes beyond

0:26:29.880 --> 0:26:34.119
<v Speaker 16>just manufacturing chips, but actually into also things like energy production,

0:26:34.280 --> 0:26:37.240
<v Speaker 16>which is a huge and growing resource for them that

0:26:37.240 --> 0:26:38.560
<v Speaker 16>they're quite worried about securing.

0:26:39.240 --> 0:26:42.399
<v Speaker 3>What's interesting here is the players. You know, we have

0:26:42.600 --> 0:26:48.040
<v Speaker 3>some understanding that Sam met with UAE officials. G forty

0:26:48.080 --> 0:26:50.280
<v Speaker 3>two is a name that gets bandied round, But do

0:26:50.400 --> 0:26:52.560
<v Speaker 3>we know who's in this coalition so far?

0:26:53.520 --> 0:26:55.720
<v Speaker 5>So we know the pitch is that it's worldwide.

0:26:56.560 --> 0:27:01.160
<v Speaker 16>Sam is traveling to Washington, DC today right to meet

0:27:01.280 --> 0:27:05.520
<v Speaker 16>with people on Capitol Hill, national security leaders, so we

0:27:05.600 --> 0:27:08.040
<v Speaker 16>know that, you know, he's talking to US leaders as well,

0:27:08.960 --> 0:27:12.080
<v Speaker 16>but we also know that he's talking to He has

0:27:12.119 --> 0:27:15.359
<v Speaker 16>in the past talking to leaders of several Western countries

0:27:15.440 --> 0:27:17.960
<v Speaker 16>and democracies, and so the pitch goes beyond just the

0:27:18.040 --> 0:27:18.600
<v Speaker 16>Middle East.

0:27:18.680 --> 0:27:21.840
<v Speaker 4>For sure, it's going to resonate with law makers. It's

0:27:21.880 --> 0:27:24.920
<v Speaker 4>got to resonate with the supply chain more sure. And

0:27:25.640 --> 0:27:27.440
<v Speaker 4>we're seeing a lot of money being spent by the

0:27:27.520 --> 0:27:32.600
<v Speaker 4>US government trying a law offshore chip makers manufacturers fabs

0:27:32.720 --> 0:27:34.200
<v Speaker 4>ultimately coming from TSMC.

0:27:34.320 --> 0:27:36.280
<v Speaker 5>There's much reporting on whether Samsung is going to.

0:27:36.280 --> 0:27:37.120
<v Speaker 6>Be here as well.

0:27:37.200 --> 0:27:40.600
<v Speaker 4>Digging in deeper, how much is he talking to Corporate

0:27:40.920 --> 0:27:43.600
<v Speaker 4>America and corporations more broadly as well?

0:27:43.760 --> 0:27:46.399
<v Speaker 16>Just because this doesn't happen even night right, I mean,

0:27:46.440 --> 0:27:49.880
<v Speaker 16>I think this conversation is going to go beyond open

0:27:49.920 --> 0:27:51.920
<v Speaker 16>an eye to other industries. I don't think you know,

0:27:52.680 --> 0:27:54.520
<v Speaker 16>you don't want the pitch to sort of just focus

0:27:54.600 --> 0:27:58.919
<v Speaker 16>on one company, but rather on building out the capabilities

0:27:58.960 --> 0:28:01.360
<v Speaker 16>for industry as a whole. So that's what I'm under

0:28:01.400 --> 0:28:03.560
<v Speaker 16>seeing the discussion to be at these times.

0:28:04.400 --> 0:28:07.119
<v Speaker 4>It's a brilliant reporting from both you and ED and

0:28:07.240 --> 0:28:09.600
<v Speaker 4>we'll see what that conversation ends up looking like on

0:28:09.720 --> 0:28:10.600
<v Speaker 4>Capitol Hill as well.

0:28:10.920 --> 0:28:13.119
<v Speaker 5>I'm sure you're reporting on that too, Sharon Guffrey. We

0:28:13.160 --> 0:28:13.840
<v Speaker 5>thank you so much.

0:28:13.960 --> 0:28:16.040
<v Speaker 4>I meanwhile, coming up, pitch Book out with its latest

0:28:16.080 --> 0:28:17.720
<v Speaker 4>report into the health of the VC industry.

0:28:17.960 --> 0:28:20.840
<v Speaker 5>May readging into the pitch Book analyst Kyle Stamford that's next.

0:28:21.320 --> 0:28:44.560
<v Speaker 4>This is Blue made Technology. Let's just talk about private

0:28:44.600 --> 0:28:46.960
<v Speaker 4>markets a little bit. Fundraising they're in beginning of twenty

0:28:47.040 --> 0:28:49.840
<v Speaker 4>twenty four met with some actual residual optimism, but that

0:28:49.960 --> 0:28:53.440
<v Speaker 4>did not translate into meaningful growth in VC activity. That's

0:28:53.440 --> 0:28:56.080
<v Speaker 4>all according to Pitchbook's latest Venture Monitor report, and it

0:28:56.160 --> 0:28:59.960
<v Speaker 4>highlights the competition for capital remains a fierce two years

0:29:00.240 --> 0:29:02.680
<v Speaker 4>into a slowdown, and while stronger companies might still be

0:29:02.720 --> 0:29:04.240
<v Speaker 4>able to compel investment, the same is.

0:29:04.280 --> 0:29:06.640
<v Speaker 5>Not true for those that are kind of struggling.

0:29:06.840 --> 0:29:09.880
<v Speaker 4>Carl Stamford with please to say, leads US Venture capital

0:29:09.920 --> 0:29:12.440
<v Speaker 4>research over at Pitchbook and joins us. And so it

0:29:12.560 --> 0:29:14.320
<v Speaker 4>really feels like a tailor that haves and the have not.

0:29:14.520 --> 0:29:16.360
<v Speaker 4>If you're an AI dialing, you're able to reap it in.

0:29:16.480 --> 0:29:19.440
<v Speaker 4>If you're not, and you're not managing to grow revenue

0:29:19.520 --> 0:29:22.120
<v Speaker 4>and indeed profitability and count yourself out.

0:29:22.520 --> 0:29:24.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but I mean at some point that's where this

0:29:24.520 --> 0:29:27.840
<v Speaker 1>market should be, right, I mean, we're looking at high

0:29:27.920 --> 0:29:31.000
<v Speaker 1>risk investments, companies that should be growing fast, being able

0:29:31.080 --> 0:29:34.600
<v Speaker 1>to get their their product and market and eventually exit

0:29:34.680 --> 0:29:35.240
<v Speaker 1>down the line.

0:29:36.320 --> 0:29:38.080
<v Speaker 2>Fifty five thousand companies.

0:29:37.760 --> 0:29:40.520
<v Speaker 1>Are currently VC backed in the US market, you know,

0:29:40.960 --> 0:29:43.720
<v Speaker 1>one hundred and twenty thousand or so globally. That's a

0:29:43.840 --> 0:29:47.600
<v Speaker 1>huge number of companies that still are fighting through similar trajectory,

0:29:47.640 --> 0:29:50.200
<v Speaker 1>similar sectors, and fighting for that capital that's just not

0:29:50.360 --> 0:29:50.880
<v Speaker 1>there anymore.

0:29:51.320 --> 0:29:51.560
<v Speaker 6>Okay.

0:29:52.040 --> 0:29:55.680
<v Speaker 3>I am hearing and seeing things that the data doesn't show.

0:29:55.880 --> 0:29:59.080
<v Speaker 3>For example, twenty four hours ago, we had Toyota Ventures

0:29:59.160 --> 0:30:03.440
<v Speaker 3>on the show. They are a single LP fund granted Toyota,

0:30:03.880 --> 0:30:06.400
<v Speaker 3>but they raised even more money from that LP to

0:30:06.560 --> 0:30:10.160
<v Speaker 3>invest in physical stuff I'm hearing lots about funds that

0:30:10.240 --> 0:30:16.640
<v Speaker 3>are being raised to invest in manufacturing industrialization. Why is

0:30:16.720 --> 0:30:17.960
<v Speaker 3>that not showing up in the data?

0:30:18.040 --> 0:30:19.920
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Right, Well, I think first if you start with

0:30:20.000 --> 0:30:23.960
<v Speaker 1>Toyota Adventures or these corporate LPs, they have a much

0:30:24.040 --> 0:30:26.800
<v Speaker 1>different return profile or ability to get these different returns

0:30:26.840 --> 0:30:30.360
<v Speaker 1>than a attraditional VC autritional LP might be looking for. Right,

0:30:30.440 --> 0:30:36.479
<v Speaker 1>there's a return on products or ability to integrate new

0:30:36.560 --> 0:30:40.680
<v Speaker 1>products into their cars down the road. As the attritional LP, though,

0:30:40.720 --> 0:30:42.880
<v Speaker 1>they're looking for that cash on cash return, and we

0:30:43.000 --> 0:30:45.480
<v Speaker 1>have not seen that by any means. I mean, all

0:30:45.560 --> 0:30:49.880
<v Speaker 1>the last quarter, the entire story was about Reddit and Esterilabs,

0:30:49.880 --> 0:30:53.440
<v Speaker 1>which were solid IPOs, but in total in the US

0:30:53.520 --> 0:30:55.560
<v Speaker 1>it was just eighteen point six billion dollars in exit

0:30:55.600 --> 0:30:57.440
<v Speaker 1>value that was generated. And so if you're an LP

0:30:57.680 --> 0:31:00.840
<v Speaker 1>without those returns and those distributions is coming back to you,

0:31:01.440 --> 0:31:04.880
<v Speaker 1>there's less incentive to put money back into the market now,

0:31:05.360 --> 0:31:06.400
<v Speaker 1>or there's not an ability.

0:31:06.560 --> 0:31:06.640
<v Speaker 16>Right.

0:31:06.720 --> 0:31:09.000
<v Speaker 1>They're looking for that capital would come back to recycle

0:31:09.040 --> 0:31:11.600
<v Speaker 1>into new funds and new commitments and make sure that

0:31:11.640 --> 0:31:13.480
<v Speaker 1>they're in all these vintage years. But if that's not

0:31:13.600 --> 0:31:16.120
<v Speaker 1>coming back, there's just no way for these traditional LPs

0:31:16.440 --> 0:31:18.560
<v Speaker 1>to get or to put money back into the venture

0:31:18.600 --> 0:31:19.120
<v Speaker 1>market right.

0:31:19.040 --> 0:31:21.760
<v Speaker 4>Now, and you say traditional LPs, and it has been

0:31:21.840 --> 0:31:25.600
<v Speaker 4>fascinating to see almost the domination of corporate VC in

0:31:25.640 --> 0:31:31.160
<v Speaker 4>the area of AI, certainly compared to the venture capital

0:31:31.640 --> 0:31:34.680
<v Speaker 4>arena right now. Who are a new guard of LPs

0:31:34.960 --> 0:31:38.520
<v Speaker 4>that aren't corporate. Are we seeing bench capital companies managing

0:31:38.560 --> 0:31:41.040
<v Speaker 4>to lure in different types of investors to secure their

0:31:41.080 --> 0:31:41.560
<v Speaker 4>next funds?

0:31:42.000 --> 0:31:43.880
<v Speaker 2>Do you think the investor of the LP bas is

0:31:43.920 --> 0:31:45.280
<v Speaker 2>going to always be wide ranging?

0:31:45.360 --> 0:31:45.440
<v Speaker 9>Right?

0:31:45.560 --> 0:31:48.400
<v Speaker 1>Pensions obviously are in that you sell CalPERS, read up

0:31:48.560 --> 0:31:52.280
<v Speaker 1>their commitment and increase their commitment to VC or the

0:31:52.360 --> 0:31:52.880
<v Speaker 1>last quarter.

0:31:53.560 --> 0:31:55.000
<v Speaker 2>I mean, corporates obviously are huge.

0:31:55.040 --> 0:31:57.280
<v Speaker 1>You look at the Japanese corporations and there's trillions of

0:31:57.320 --> 0:31:59.440
<v Speaker 1>dollars on their balance sheet they're able to put into

0:31:59.720 --> 0:32:04.400
<v Speaker 1>put to work in venture into new businicists. The large

0:32:04.920 --> 0:32:07.680
<v Speaker 1>megacaps in the US as well, huge amounts of cash

0:32:07.720 --> 0:32:09.040
<v Speaker 1>to be able to put it put to work, and

0:32:09.080 --> 0:32:10.960
<v Speaker 1>we've seen that in some of their AI invest some

0:32:11.080 --> 0:32:12.840
<v Speaker 1>of the past few years. I think where it really

0:32:12.880 --> 0:32:15.720
<v Speaker 1>gets down to struggling for LPs when you look at

0:32:15.720 --> 0:32:18.040
<v Speaker 1>the smaller ones, right the high net worth individuals that

0:32:18.160 --> 0:32:21.640
<v Speaker 1>maybe are feeling still very wealthy, but not nearly what

0:32:21.760 --> 0:32:25.240
<v Speaker 1>they were in twenty twenty one. You look at foundations

0:32:25.360 --> 0:32:28.560
<v Speaker 1>or endowments that are finding ways to put capital to work,

0:32:28.640 --> 0:32:32.880
<v Speaker 1>but maybe are not as able to take that ten

0:32:32.960 --> 0:32:35.160
<v Speaker 1>years of illiquidity that DC is going to bring to

0:32:36.240 --> 0:32:39.000
<v Speaker 1>to their cash. So there is still a broad range

0:32:39.440 --> 0:32:43.560
<v Speaker 1>in investors. Gps are being very strategic with who they're

0:32:43.560 --> 0:32:46.480
<v Speaker 1>going after and how they're positioning their strategy, and BC

0:32:46.640 --> 0:32:48.959
<v Speaker 1>fund to those LPs make sure it works for them

0:32:49.000 --> 0:32:49.280
<v Speaker 1>as well.

0:32:50.640 --> 0:32:56.520
<v Speaker 3>Kyle, it's been relatively exciting recently, relatively in the IPO market.

0:32:57.160 --> 0:33:01.080
<v Speaker 3>You know Reddit as an example. Is there a relationship

0:33:01.160 --> 0:33:05.600
<v Speaker 3>between upstream downstream? So when LPs and the firms that

0:33:05.600 --> 0:33:08.120
<v Speaker 3>they give money to see activity in the IPO market,

0:33:08.520 --> 0:33:12.200
<v Speaker 3>so they regain faith that actually putting something into a

0:33:12.320 --> 0:33:15.440
<v Speaker 3>five or ten year horizon is a good idea.

0:33:15.920 --> 0:33:17.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think relative excitement is a really good

0:33:17.800 --> 0:33:20.840
<v Speaker 1>way to position Q one, right. I mean, those two

0:33:21.000 --> 0:33:23.480
<v Speaker 1>IPOs were great, but there's seven hundred and twenty unicorns

0:33:23.520 --> 0:33:26.160
<v Speaker 1>in the market right now or private in the US,

0:33:26.560 --> 0:33:29.320
<v Speaker 1>or fourteen hundred globally. Globally, there's a four point eight

0:33:29.400 --> 0:33:33.320
<v Speaker 1>trillion dollar market cap on these unicorns, and so a

0:33:33.400 --> 0:33:36.440
<v Speaker 1>couple IPOs is great, but until those distributions actually get

0:33:36.560 --> 0:33:39.400
<v Speaker 1>going back to LPs again, it's going to be a

0:33:39.440 --> 0:33:41.280
<v Speaker 1>slow fundraising market. It's going to be a slow deal

0:33:41.320 --> 0:33:46.840
<v Speaker 1>making market. We have our fun distribution data is showing

0:33:46.880 --> 0:33:49.880
<v Speaker 1>that distributions over the past four quarters have been as

0:33:50.000 --> 0:33:52.520
<v Speaker 1>low as they were in the global financial crisis. And

0:33:52.640 --> 0:33:56.760
<v Speaker 1>so again, there is definitely some positives that come out

0:33:56.800 --> 0:33:59.760
<v Speaker 1>of a few companies going to public, but there needs to.

0:33:59.760 --> 0:34:00.520
<v Speaker 2>Be many more.

0:34:00.640 --> 0:34:02.680
<v Speaker 1>And the M and A market again too, where a

0:34:02.720 --> 0:34:05.240
<v Speaker 1>lot of these returns are also going to get generated,

0:34:05.440 --> 0:34:08.160
<v Speaker 1>is non existing. Many of the deals we have from

0:34:08.160 --> 0:34:10.920
<v Speaker 1>an M and A perspective this quarter were had no

0:34:11.000 --> 0:34:14.000
<v Speaker 1>deal of value attached, right, so their immaterial to the

0:34:14.080 --> 0:34:16.640
<v Speaker 1>corporate growth. And so that's a very difficult spot when

0:34:16.640 --> 0:34:17.759
<v Speaker 1>you look at returns down the road.

0:34:18.320 --> 0:34:21.200
<v Speaker 3>Hey, Carl, let's tap into your relative excitement. What are

0:34:21.239 --> 0:34:24.600
<v Speaker 3>you relatively excited about thematically? Subsector wise?

0:34:25.440 --> 0:34:27.840
<v Speaker 1>Sure, subsector wise, I mean, obviously AI is going to

0:34:27.920 --> 0:34:30.879
<v Speaker 1>be the major area going forward. I think we've seen

0:34:30.920 --> 0:34:33.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot of unique companies and you need this models

0:34:33.760 --> 0:34:36.120
<v Speaker 1>getting started. I think It's interesting dynamic too, with the

0:34:36.200 --> 0:34:39.960
<v Speaker 1>incumbents and Microsoft and AI and Microsoft and Google and

0:34:40.000 --> 0:34:42.640
<v Speaker 1>Amazon being so heavy into it. I think it's going

0:34:42.719 --> 0:34:46.239
<v Speaker 1>to be very quick to what we're talking about, the

0:34:46.280 --> 0:34:48.400
<v Speaker 1>bifurcation and have and have nots. Then there's gonna be

0:34:48.400 --> 0:34:50.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot of money made in AI and there's a

0:34:50.080 --> 0:34:51.920
<v Speaker 1>lot of money loss, and I think it's be relatively

0:34:52.040 --> 0:34:54.520
<v Speaker 1>quick over the next few years because of the incumbents

0:34:54.560 --> 0:34:55.719
<v Speaker 1>and how they're playing in the market.

0:34:57.360 --> 0:34:58.200
<v Speaker 2>You know, Tech in.

0:34:58.280 --> 0:35:01.359
<v Speaker 1>General, I think is still really strong. Even though it's

0:35:01.360 --> 0:35:04.279
<v Speaker 1>a slow market. Like Karen said, strong companies are getting funded.

0:35:04.320 --> 0:35:06.680
<v Speaker 1>There's money out there for these companies, and so tech

0:35:07.080 --> 0:35:11.120
<v Speaker 1>is going to continue pushing forward in We like what

0:35:11.200 --> 0:35:13.480
<v Speaker 1>we've seen, but it's in me a difficult market, I

0:35:13.560 --> 0:35:15.000
<v Speaker 1>think for every sector down the road.

0:35:15.239 --> 0:35:18.400
<v Speaker 3>Carl Stamford, lead US Bench Capital Research Analysts at Pitchburg,

0:35:18.440 --> 0:35:19.279
<v Speaker 3>Thank you very much.

0:35:26.400 --> 0:35:29.360
<v Speaker 4>More protection for teens on Instagram is coming now. The

0:35:29.440 --> 0:35:32.160
<v Speaker 4>social platform, run of course by Meta, is turning to

0:35:32.400 --> 0:35:36.400
<v Speaker 4>AI to blur out nude images sent via direct message now.

0:35:36.480 --> 0:35:39.480
<v Speaker 4>Instagram announced in a blog post today that the update

0:35:39.520 --> 0:35:42.400
<v Speaker 4>aims to protect users from unwanted photos as well as

0:35:42.440 --> 0:35:46.200
<v Speaker 4>from potential sextortion scammers. This comes, of course, as US

0:35:46.239 --> 0:35:49.400
<v Speaker 4>politicians have been continuing to accuse a platform of damage

0:35:49.480 --> 0:35:50.840
<v Speaker 4>to youth mental health.

0:35:52.440 --> 0:35:53.480
<v Speaker 6>Let's stay with Instagram.

0:35:53.560 --> 0:35:58.000
<v Speaker 3>It's recently changed its policies for political content and it

0:35:58.120 --> 0:36:01.919
<v Speaker 3>has caused a stir from some users. The move, which

0:36:02.080 --> 0:36:06.280
<v Speaker 3>is coming during an election year, has prompted some pushback,

0:36:06.440 --> 0:36:10.120
<v Speaker 3>with some like Republican Senator Marsha Blackburn even accusing the

0:36:10.200 --> 0:36:13.120
<v Speaker 3>company of censorship. You're looking at the posts that she

0:36:13.280 --> 0:36:16.520
<v Speaker 3>made on x Let's break it all down with el Rochford,

0:36:16.600 --> 0:36:19.760
<v Speaker 3>senior data senior data and policy specialists with the Crime

0:36:19.800 --> 0:36:23.480
<v Speaker 3>and Justice Institute, as well as Jess Natali, creator of

0:36:23.600 --> 0:36:28.200
<v Speaker 3>the So Informed Instagram page. Jess, Let's start with you.

0:36:28.320 --> 0:36:32.000
<v Speaker 3>You are a user, a well followed user of Instagram.

0:36:32.719 --> 0:36:35.160
<v Speaker 3>The policy and its rationale are clear.

0:36:35.280 --> 0:36:36.400
<v Speaker 6>What is your response to it?

0:36:36.800 --> 0:36:40.400
<v Speaker 17>I mean, I think it's quite alarming and quite transparent,

0:36:40.520 --> 0:36:44.200
<v Speaker 17>the timing in which this is being rolled out, and

0:36:44.320 --> 0:36:48.839
<v Speaker 17>as small things like preparing people for the election, giving

0:36:48.880 --> 0:36:53.480
<v Speaker 17>them the educational tools all the way to a genocide

0:36:53.520 --> 0:36:58.719
<v Speaker 17>being documented on their platform. I think it's taking away

0:36:58.960 --> 0:37:02.600
<v Speaker 17>the authority through people to consume what they want to

0:37:02.640 --> 0:37:06.520
<v Speaker 17>be consuming, which is important information, it's news.

0:37:08.080 --> 0:37:13.080
<v Speaker 4>I'm interested in the academic perspective here, l because your

0:37:13.120 --> 0:37:15.719
<v Speaker 4>PhD in sociology of the per dou you're focused on

0:37:15.840 --> 0:37:19.480
<v Speaker 4>reproductive justice, on racial justice movements in particular. And I'm

0:37:19.520 --> 0:37:23.200
<v Speaker 4>wondering if when ultimately Instagram is saying we are not

0:37:23.360 --> 0:37:25.720
<v Speaker 4>trying to clamp down on what you have actively decided

0:37:25.800 --> 0:37:27.960
<v Speaker 4>you want to watch those that you follow, but it's

0:37:28.040 --> 0:37:30.200
<v Speaker 4>more people that you don't follow sort of suddenly getting

0:37:30.239 --> 0:37:31.520
<v Speaker 4>into your.

0:37:31.480 --> 0:37:33.000
<v Speaker 5>Reels, into your streams more poorly.

0:37:33.480 --> 0:37:36.680
<v Speaker 4>How much do you think that this does limit, you know, ultimately,

0:37:36.719 --> 0:37:38.719
<v Speaker 4>people not wanting to be bombarded with things that they

0:37:38.760 --> 0:37:40.680
<v Speaker 4>do want to be seeing, or indeed, does it cut

0:37:40.760 --> 0:37:44.239
<v Speaker 4>off an ability to see outside your own bubble right now?

0:37:45.120 --> 0:37:51.120
<v Speaker 18>Sure, I think that's a great question. Opting into seeing

0:37:51.160 --> 0:37:56.400
<v Speaker 18>political content is a little bit tricky because a lot

0:37:56.440 --> 0:37:58.560
<v Speaker 18>of users weren't aware of this future was being rolled

0:37:58.560 --> 0:38:02.320
<v Speaker 18>out at all, so they weren't aware that this rollout

0:38:02.360 --> 0:38:04.520
<v Speaker 18>would impact what they were seeing or not seeing.

0:38:05.160 --> 0:38:08.480
<v Speaker 5>But it seems a bit odd the selection criteria.

0:38:08.680 --> 0:38:11.600
<v Speaker 18>So social topics are being filtered out, but how is

0:38:11.680 --> 0:38:19.680
<v Speaker 18>that being defined? Social media offers essential infrastructure informational infrastructure

0:38:20.160 --> 0:38:24.239
<v Speaker 18>to users and so a lot of young people are

0:38:24.360 --> 0:38:27.600
<v Speaker 18>getting their news from social media and this will impact

0:38:27.640 --> 0:38:29.759
<v Speaker 18>what they're seeing and what they're not seeing, and they

0:38:29.800 --> 0:38:32.200
<v Speaker 18>may not even be aware that there are things being

0:38:32.280 --> 0:38:33.800
<v Speaker 18>filtered from their viewing.

0:38:34.600 --> 0:38:37.279
<v Speaker 4>So before we dig in with you all a little

0:38:37.280 --> 0:38:39.600
<v Speaker 4>bit more about where the lines are drawn and where

0:38:39.640 --> 0:38:41.920
<v Speaker 4>a blurry is to what is seen as political content.

0:38:42.040 --> 0:38:44.400
<v Speaker 4>I just want to go to you, Jess, because your

0:38:44.480 --> 0:38:47.520
<v Speaker 4>numbers just give us a breakdown. People who opt in

0:38:47.719 --> 0:38:50.240
<v Speaker 4>to see your content because they want to be politically

0:38:50.320 --> 0:38:52.880
<v Speaker 4>informed by you, are they seeing less of.

0:38:52.920 --> 0:38:53.960
<v Speaker 5>Your content on the back of this.

0:38:54.200 --> 0:38:56.840
<v Speaker 4>You still getting the amount of video engagement, still getting

0:38:56.840 --> 0:38:58.719
<v Speaker 4>the amount of people who want to come and build

0:38:58.800 --> 0:38:59.400
<v Speaker 4>up your profile.

0:38:59.480 --> 0:39:04.479
<v Speaker 17>Ultimately, there is absolutely a dramatic decrease and the people

0:39:04.560 --> 0:39:07.440
<v Speaker 17>I'm reaching and the people who are engaging, which you know,

0:39:07.640 --> 0:39:11.520
<v Speaker 17>those go hand in hand. Prior to this being rolled out,

0:39:11.600 --> 0:39:15.279
<v Speaker 17>it was also there were censorship in place before this,

0:39:15.440 --> 0:39:17.440
<v Speaker 17>and I want to make that clear. Instagram with the

0:39:17.480 --> 0:39:21.319
<v Speaker 17>sensoring content well before this new rollout, but this has

0:39:21.440 --> 0:39:24.600
<v Speaker 17>caused the dramatic decrease. I have three point one million followers,

0:39:25.160 --> 0:39:27.120
<v Speaker 17>so three point one million people who have opted in

0:39:27.200 --> 0:39:30.080
<v Speaker 17>to see what I'm posting, and I have been reaching

0:39:30.200 --> 0:39:33.080
<v Speaker 17>somewhere between six and eight percent of my own followers

0:39:33.320 --> 0:39:34.200
<v Speaker 17>since this went.

0:39:35.040 --> 0:39:39.040
<v Speaker 3>Okay, well, I'm an Instagram user, Caroline's Instagram user. That

0:39:39.239 --> 0:39:41.279
<v Speaker 3>there is the policy side, and then there's just the

0:39:41.360 --> 0:39:44.839
<v Speaker 3>technology the platform, And I think many people would say

0:39:45.360 --> 0:39:48.920
<v Speaker 3>Instagram is not a place you go for news or politics.

0:39:49.320 --> 0:39:52.360
<v Speaker 3>Many would just say it's for entertainment value. It is

0:39:52.480 --> 0:39:55.520
<v Speaker 3>to share what you're interested in from a passion point

0:39:55.560 --> 0:39:58.480
<v Speaker 3>of view. That is an experience I think many people have.

0:39:59.000 --> 0:40:02.080
<v Speaker 3>What is your research tell you about the majority of

0:40:02.320 --> 0:40:05.440
<v Speaker 3>use case for why people go to Instagram and the

0:40:05.600 --> 0:40:07.000
<v Speaker 3>type of content they're trying to get.

0:40:07.840 --> 0:40:08.759
<v Speaker 11>Absolutely so.

0:40:08.960 --> 0:40:11.319
<v Speaker 18>I think there's also many people who would say they

0:40:11.360 --> 0:40:13.799
<v Speaker 18>don't go to Instagram to see food content, that they're

0:40:13.840 --> 0:40:17.120
<v Speaker 18>sick of seeing food blogs and recipes. Right, So, for

0:40:17.239 --> 0:40:19.759
<v Speaker 18>every user who doesn't want to see political content, there

0:40:19.800 --> 0:40:22.799
<v Speaker 18>are users who are seeking out political content and news

0:40:22.920 --> 0:40:27.680
<v Speaker 18>content on Instagram. The perception that Instagram is not a

0:40:27.719 --> 0:40:31.560
<v Speaker 18>political platform is just that it's a perception. There are

0:40:31.760 --> 0:40:37.120
<v Speaker 18>plenty of users who use Instagram to follow journalists, to

0:40:37.320 --> 0:40:42.600
<v Speaker 18>follow news outlets, to follow political organizations and political organizations

0:40:42.800 --> 0:40:46.520
<v Speaker 18>are very active on the platform, so this is going

0:40:46.600 --> 0:40:51.360
<v Speaker 18>to harm those organizations in all directions across the political spectrum.

0:40:52.480 --> 0:40:55.120
<v Speaker 18>And I think it's a bit shortsighted to say that

0:40:55.200 --> 0:40:58.080
<v Speaker 18>Instagram isn't a political platform and that that's not what

0:40:58.320 --> 0:41:01.080
<v Speaker 18>users want to see. We have plenty of evidence that

0:41:01.280 --> 0:41:04.520
<v Speaker 18>activists are online and that Instagram is being used for

0:41:04.719 --> 0:41:10.800
<v Speaker 18>political organization and for entertainment purposes. A lot of political

0:41:10.880 --> 0:41:14.080
<v Speaker 18>content is entertaining for people, although that might not be

0:41:14.200 --> 0:41:17.360
<v Speaker 18>their primary source of entertainment and often.

0:41:17.200 --> 0:41:19.759
<v Speaker 5>Their passion throughout. You're bringing both of your passions today.

0:41:19.880 --> 0:41:22.600
<v Speaker 4>L Rochford, of course, and Jess Nattel we wish we

0:41:22.640 --> 0:41:23.560
<v Speaker 4>had along with both of you.

0:41:23.840 --> 0:41:24.960
<v Speaker 5>This is broom big technology