WEBVTT - Sheath of Evidence

0:00:03.720 --> 0:00:08.399
<v Speaker 1>Authram is really good at analyzing DNA that previously was

0:00:08.400 --> 0:00:10.440
<v Speaker 1>thought to be unanalyzable.

0:00:11.160 --> 0:00:13.119
<v Speaker 2>If they're not in the criminal database, they're not going

0:00:13.200 --> 0:00:15.720
<v Speaker 2>to get caught, even though they leave tons of DNA behind,

0:00:15.880 --> 0:00:17.800
<v Speaker 2>And now we can do that through FIG.

0:00:18.440 --> 0:00:21.840
<v Speaker 3>I mean, what can you say? The technology that authram

0:00:21.960 --> 0:00:25.360
<v Speaker 3>utilized in this case took it to a whole other level.

0:00:32.120 --> 0:00:36.280
<v Speaker 4>This is the Idaho Massacre A production of KT Studios

0:00:36.520 --> 0:00:45.120
<v Speaker 4>and iHeartRadio, Season three, episode nine, Sheath of Evidence. I'm

0:00:45.120 --> 0:00:48.720
<v Speaker 4>Courtney Armstrong, a producer at KAT Studios, with Stephanie Leidecker,

0:00:49.120 --> 0:00:54.800
<v Speaker 4>Alison Bankston, and Gabriel Castillo. One of the unsung heroes

0:00:54.880 --> 0:00:58.480
<v Speaker 4>of the Brian Coberger case wasn't a detective, a judge,

0:00:58.560 --> 0:01:05.400
<v Speaker 4>or even a prosecutor. It was a laboratory nestled in

0:01:05.480 --> 0:01:09.920
<v Speaker 4>the Bucolic suburb of Woodlands, Texas. Sits Authrum, a company

0:01:09.920 --> 0:01:12.560
<v Speaker 4>that has quickly become a world leader in forensic science.

0:01:13.240 --> 0:01:16.200
<v Speaker 4>AUTHORAM is renowned for pioneering some of the most advanced

0:01:16.240 --> 0:01:21.880
<v Speaker 4>techniques in forensic investigative genetic genealogy, also known as FIG

0:01:22.200 --> 0:01:27.120
<v Speaker 4>or sometimes IgG. Initially, in this case, the FBI was

0:01:27.240 --> 0:01:29.680
<v Speaker 4>enabled to find a match for the single source male

0:01:29.800 --> 0:01:33.360
<v Speaker 4>DNA recovered from the ninth sheath found in Madison Mogan's

0:01:33.400 --> 0:01:37.680
<v Speaker 4>bedroom using COTIS, the Combined DNA Index system which links

0:01:37.760 --> 0:01:43.120
<v Speaker 4>DNA profiles to known offenders. At that point, investigators turned

0:01:43.200 --> 0:01:46.360
<v Speaker 4>to AUTHRM, and it was this decision that blew the

0:01:46.560 --> 0:01:51.880
<v Speaker 4>entire case wide open. On today's episode, where Spotlighting a

0:01:51.960 --> 0:01:57.040
<v Speaker 4>podcast we all admire America's Crime Lab, We're joined by

0:01:57.080 --> 0:02:00.960
<v Speaker 4>its host, journalist Alan Lance Lesser, to learn more about

0:02:01.000 --> 0:02:06.160
<v Speaker 4>the groundbreaking work her show is covering. Aileen has the

0:02:06.200 --> 0:02:09.440
<v Speaker 4>inside scoop on how authorm's cutting edge methods changed the

0:02:09.480 --> 0:02:12.680
<v Speaker 4>game and how this lab helped identify the man who

0:02:12.720 --> 0:02:18.560
<v Speaker 4>brutally murdered Madison Mogan, Kylie Gonsalvez, Xana Kernodle, and Ethan Chapin.

0:02:21.000 --> 0:02:24.760
<v Speaker 4>Aileen's joined by Katie's Studio's producer, Alison Bankston.

0:02:28.760 --> 0:02:34.079
<v Speaker 1>America's Crime Lab focuses on the intimate stories of victims

0:02:34.160 --> 0:02:37.640
<v Speaker 1>and their families from some of the most heinous crimes

0:02:37.639 --> 0:02:40.760
<v Speaker 1>in America and crimes that are being solved by a

0:02:40.800 --> 0:02:44.639
<v Speaker 1>specific lab that exists just outside of Houston called Authrum

0:02:44.800 --> 0:02:48.639
<v Speaker 1>that's using new DNA technology and I think basically Authrum

0:02:48.760 --> 0:02:51.200
<v Speaker 1>the Lab wanted to get this information out there because

0:02:51.240 --> 0:02:54.360
<v Speaker 1>the more people know about it, the more that detectives

0:02:54.400 --> 0:02:56.640
<v Speaker 1>will know, hey, we can use this technology in this

0:02:56.720 --> 0:02:59.320
<v Speaker 1>case where we simply can't figure out who left their

0:02:59.400 --> 0:03:02.160
<v Speaker 1>DNA at a crime scene. And so it almost is

0:03:02.200 --> 0:03:05.720
<v Speaker 1>a matter of spreading the word while also telling these

0:03:05.720 --> 0:03:06.959
<v Speaker 1>really riveting stories.

0:03:07.639 --> 0:03:09.960
<v Speaker 5>That's incredible, and I agree. I think it's great to

0:03:09.960 --> 0:03:12.040
<v Speaker 5>get the word out on this amazing technology and to

0:03:12.120 --> 0:03:14.000
<v Speaker 5>raise awareness about what it is and you know how

0:03:14.000 --> 0:03:16.600
<v Speaker 5>effective it really can be. I understand it was started

0:03:16.639 --> 0:03:19.799
<v Speaker 5>by Kristin and David Middleman, to geniuses in their own right,

0:03:19.960 --> 0:03:22.200
<v Speaker 5>and you know you work closely with them. Can you

0:03:22.240 --> 0:03:24.040
<v Speaker 5>tell me a little bit about who these two are.

0:03:24.560 --> 0:03:29.800
<v Speaker 1>Kristin and David Middleman. They have been working in genetics

0:03:29.919 --> 0:03:33.880
<v Speaker 1>for years. They actually met in grad school and started

0:03:33.919 --> 0:03:38.120
<v Speaker 1>working together on projects. And they're actually also married and

0:03:38.480 --> 0:03:40.960
<v Speaker 1>have a family, and they kind of spend all their

0:03:41.000 --> 0:03:44.120
<v Speaker 1>time together and they're really devoted to this work. And

0:03:44.480 --> 0:03:48.560
<v Speaker 1>essentially they had this background in genetics. I think David

0:03:48.680 --> 0:03:52.640
<v Speaker 1>first started studying the genome project and then went on

0:03:52.760 --> 0:03:56.800
<v Speaker 1>from there and they just felt that there was a

0:03:56.840 --> 0:04:00.480
<v Speaker 1>hole that needed to be filled that they had ability

0:04:00.560 --> 0:04:03.680
<v Speaker 1>to make this technology and not just study genetics, but

0:04:03.800 --> 0:04:07.480
<v Speaker 1>actually use their knowledge of genetics to help people and

0:04:07.600 --> 0:04:12.000
<v Speaker 1>families who are victims of horrible crimes. They're passionate about

0:04:12.000 --> 0:04:15.520
<v Speaker 1>the fact that even there are so many unidentified human

0:04:15.600 --> 0:04:18.279
<v Speaker 1>remains out there, you know, people who have passed away,

0:04:18.720 --> 0:04:21.400
<v Speaker 1>and you know, to their families it's like they've disappeared.

0:04:21.440 --> 0:04:24.320
<v Speaker 1>They don't know where they are, but the government hasn't

0:04:24.360 --> 0:04:26.920
<v Speaker 1>even identified who they are, which is the first step

0:04:27.040 --> 0:04:29.920
<v Speaker 1>in any investigation if it's a murder or something. And

0:04:30.040 --> 0:04:33.960
<v Speaker 1>so basically they've made this their life's work and they

0:04:34.240 --> 0:04:37.560
<v Speaker 1>literally are working all the time. Like I think I

0:04:37.640 --> 0:04:40.800
<v Speaker 1>work hard, No, they work hard. They like live and

0:04:40.920 --> 0:04:44.480
<v Speaker 1>breathe their science and just doing everything they can to

0:04:44.560 --> 0:04:48.279
<v Speaker 1>make sure their science is at the most rigorous level.

0:04:48.360 --> 0:04:50.400
<v Speaker 1>But then also they're trying to get the word out

0:04:50.400 --> 0:04:53.200
<v Speaker 1>there and they're trying to help as many people as

0:04:53.240 --> 0:04:53.640
<v Speaker 1>they can.

0:04:57.640 --> 0:05:02.640
<v Speaker 4>Authroom specializes in forensic investing negative genetic genealogy, a cutting

0:05:02.720 --> 0:05:07.039
<v Speaker 4>edge science that uses public genealogy databases to connect unknown

0:05:07.120 --> 0:05:14.200
<v Speaker 4>DNA to profiles already uploaded by everyday people to help

0:05:14.240 --> 0:05:17.040
<v Speaker 4>us break down what FIG is and how Authroom's approach

0:05:17.160 --> 0:05:20.160
<v Speaker 4>differs from the traditional DNA testing done in most law

0:05:20.200 --> 0:05:24.520
<v Speaker 4>enforcement labs. We brought in renowned expert doctor Gray Comikian.

0:05:25.920 --> 0:05:29.160
<v Speaker 4>Doctor Hamikian is the founder of the Idaho Innocence Project

0:05:29.200 --> 0:05:33.599
<v Speaker 4>and a former professor at Boise State University. He travels

0:05:33.640 --> 0:05:37.159
<v Speaker 4>all over the world offering his forensic insight on complex

0:05:37.240 --> 0:05:42.360
<v Speaker 4>criminal cases. He's joined by Katie Studios producer Alison Bankston.

0:05:46.200 --> 0:05:51.440
<v Speaker 2>Investigative genetic genealogy is really a giant leap forward using

0:05:51.680 --> 0:05:53.960
<v Speaker 2>some tools that have been around for a while. So

0:05:54.240 --> 0:05:57.039
<v Speaker 2>the first tool, and I think the kind of novel

0:05:57.120 --> 0:06:01.840
<v Speaker 2>thing that was brought into forensics, was the traditional genealogist

0:06:02.040 --> 0:06:05.279
<v Speaker 2>folks who would work out a libraries and newspapers and

0:06:05.400 --> 0:06:10.200
<v Speaker 2>court documents trying to construct family trees. And that was

0:06:10.279 --> 0:06:14.039
<v Speaker 2>done before DNA was done, and was used in the

0:06:14.120 --> 0:06:18.400
<v Speaker 2>courts principally to show who's related to who for the

0:06:18.400 --> 0:06:24.200
<v Speaker 2>purposes of inheritance. Then with the advent of molecular biology

0:06:24.240 --> 0:06:28.000
<v Speaker 2>and DNA sequencing in particular, we were able to combine

0:06:28.040 --> 0:06:32.480
<v Speaker 2>two fields, my field, which is sequencing DNA and reading

0:06:32.560 --> 0:06:37.239
<v Speaker 2>sequences or reading lengths of DNA, and these folks working

0:06:37.640 --> 0:06:41.799
<v Speaker 2>newspapers and documents and all these great records from hundreds

0:06:41.800 --> 0:06:44.840
<v Speaker 2>of years back. So what we're looking for is a

0:06:44.960 --> 0:06:48.080
<v Speaker 2>long piece of DNA. We want to find the longest

0:06:48.120 --> 0:06:51.640
<v Speaker 2>piece of DNA we can that the person of interest

0:06:51.720 --> 0:06:55.880
<v Speaker 2>has in common with other people in the database. So

0:06:55.960 --> 0:06:58.760
<v Speaker 2>if the person of interest is actually a piece of

0:06:58.839 --> 0:07:02.640
<v Speaker 2>evidence from a crime seeing, the police will load that

0:07:02.880 --> 0:07:06.200
<v Speaker 2>up into a database and treated as if it is

0:07:06.360 --> 0:07:09.520
<v Speaker 2>a person looking for their true parents, you know, and

0:07:09.720 --> 0:07:12.480
<v Speaker 2>orphan looking for their true parents, and the.

0:07:12.520 --> 0:07:14.520
<v Speaker 5>DNA needs to be in a certain format, right you know.

0:07:14.560 --> 0:07:18.000
<v Speaker 5>Most law enforcement agencies use the STR profile which stands

0:07:18.000 --> 0:07:20.880
<v Speaker 5>for short tandem repeat and these types of profiles can

0:07:20.880 --> 0:07:23.720
<v Speaker 5>be read through CODIS, whereas labs like AUTHROM, you know,

0:07:23.760 --> 0:07:26.560
<v Speaker 5>they have the capability to convert these DNA samples into

0:07:26.560 --> 0:07:30.920
<v Speaker 5>SNIP profiles which stands for single nuclear polymorphism profiles, and

0:07:31.000 --> 0:07:34.240
<v Speaker 5>these types of SNIP profiles can be analyzed.

0:07:33.680 --> 0:07:35.080
<v Speaker 6>Into genetic databases.

0:07:35.360 --> 0:07:37.160
<v Speaker 5>Can you tell us a little bit about the differences

0:07:37.200 --> 0:07:39.960
<v Speaker 5>between what most law enforcement crime labs use, which is

0:07:40.120 --> 0:07:44.320
<v Speaker 5>STR and SNIP profiles which are needed for forensic investigative

0:07:44.360 --> 0:07:45.320
<v Speaker 5>genetic genealogy.

0:07:46.320 --> 0:07:49.720
<v Speaker 2>The chemistry is different, the machines are different, the software

0:07:49.800 --> 0:07:53.800
<v Speaker 2>is different, and I think most importantly the mathematics is different.

0:07:54.280 --> 0:07:58.320
<v Speaker 2>So in the case of the standard STRs, we're looking

0:07:58.360 --> 0:08:00.480
<v Speaker 2>at the length of a piece of DNA, We're only

0:08:00.480 --> 0:08:02.640
<v Speaker 2>going to look at about twenty three of those lengths,

0:08:02.680 --> 0:08:06.280
<v Speaker 2>and it identifies a person. They allow us to differentiate

0:08:06.360 --> 0:08:08.080
<v Speaker 2>from one person to another.

0:08:08.320 --> 0:08:10.040
<v Speaker 5>Right, they can tell us if the person is male

0:08:10.120 --> 0:08:12.760
<v Speaker 5>or female, and if it matches someone in codis, then great,

0:08:12.840 --> 0:08:15.280
<v Speaker 5>you know there's your answer. But without a match, it's

0:08:15.360 --> 0:08:17.320
<v Speaker 5>unfortunately not really going to get you anywhere.

0:08:18.240 --> 0:08:21.280
<v Speaker 2>And the case of the snips, we're looking at hundreds

0:08:21.280 --> 0:08:25.119
<v Speaker 2>of thousands of areas in someone's genome. There are three

0:08:25.160 --> 0:08:28.000
<v Speaker 2>billion bases, so there's a lot of places you can choose,

0:08:28.040 --> 0:08:33.439
<v Speaker 2>and we're reading the actual sequences the single nucleotide bases

0:08:33.600 --> 0:08:35.240
<v Speaker 2>at particular areas.

0:08:35.760 --> 0:08:41.240
<v Speaker 7>So it's a very much more information rich, detailed profile

0:08:41.360 --> 0:08:47.240
<v Speaker 7>when you do a SNIP, and people are putting their

0:08:47.320 --> 0:08:49.559
<v Speaker 7>DNA in these databases.

0:08:49.679 --> 0:08:51.880
<v Speaker 5>Right and willingly, you know, in an effort to find

0:08:51.920 --> 0:08:55.160
<v Speaker 5>more about their heritage. Sites like my family Tree, Jetmatch,

0:08:55.520 --> 0:08:57.320
<v Speaker 5>my Heritage List goes.

0:08:57.120 --> 0:08:59.559
<v Speaker 6>On for the types of sites these people are uploading to.

0:09:00.520 --> 0:09:03.720
<v Speaker 2>And if we find a relative of someone who matches

0:09:03.760 --> 0:09:07.400
<v Speaker 2>that the SNIP profile, police can investigate that family and

0:09:07.480 --> 0:09:11.080
<v Speaker 2>then find the perpetrator. In this case. It's just a

0:09:11.080 --> 0:09:14.360
<v Speaker 2>wonderful tool because when you have a great DNA fingerprint,

0:09:14.440 --> 0:09:16.360
<v Speaker 2>and if they're not in the criminal database, they're not

0:09:16.360 --> 0:09:18.199
<v Speaker 2>going to get caught, even though they leave tons of

0:09:18.280 --> 0:09:21.640
<v Speaker 2>DNA behind. And now we can do that through fig

0:09:21.840 --> 0:09:27.480
<v Speaker 2>forensic investigative genealogies because not those criminals, but their nice

0:09:27.559 --> 0:09:33.400
<v Speaker 2>relatives have contributed DNA to public databases. And so yeah,

0:09:33.400 --> 0:09:37.920
<v Speaker 2>it's very exciting. It opens up a whole new area.

0:09:38.200 --> 0:09:43.199
<v Speaker 4>Here's journalist American Crime Lab host and authroom insider Alien

0:09:43.320 --> 0:09:44.160
<v Speaker 4>Lance Lesser.

0:09:45.720 --> 0:09:48.880
<v Speaker 1>One other really exciting piece of this is also the

0:09:48.960 --> 0:09:53.200
<v Speaker 1>technology at AUTHRM is really good at analyzing DNA that

0:09:53.360 --> 0:09:58.080
<v Speaker 1>previously was thought to be unanalyzable. But what's cool is,

0:09:58.400 --> 0:10:00.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, at a crime scene, it's not like a

0:10:00.360 --> 0:10:02.640
<v Speaker 1>clean swab of a mouth the way you might get

0:10:02.640 --> 0:10:05.960
<v Speaker 1>when you're sending in your DNA. It's often contaminated, it's degraded,

0:10:06.080 --> 0:10:08.880
<v Speaker 1>it's been sitting out in the snow, in the rain,

0:10:09.480 --> 0:10:12.600
<v Speaker 1>animals have interacted with it. Maybe there's plant DNA mixed

0:10:12.679 --> 0:10:14.960
<v Speaker 1>up with the DNA. Maybe the victims. DNA is mixed

0:10:15.040 --> 0:10:17.600
<v Speaker 1>up with the DNA and so quite often you're getting

0:10:17.600 --> 0:10:21.080
<v Speaker 1>a really not so good sample to analyze in a

0:10:21.120 --> 0:10:24.840
<v Speaker 1>lot of cold cases. And so this technology can handle

0:10:25.240 --> 0:10:29.120
<v Speaker 1>that more degraded DNA than other technology has been able

0:10:29.160 --> 0:10:30.400
<v Speaker 1>to do previously.

0:10:31.000 --> 0:10:31.600
<v Speaker 6>That's amazing.

0:10:31.679 --> 0:10:34.880
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I've definitely heard that their major cold case solving pioneers,

0:10:34.920 --> 0:10:37.800
<v Speaker 5>which is just so impressive. What are some examples of

0:10:37.840 --> 0:10:40.480
<v Speaker 5>cases that really defy the odds? I think before you'd

0:10:40.480 --> 0:10:42.520
<v Speaker 5>told me a little bit about the Carla Walker case

0:10:42.600 --> 0:10:44.040
<v Speaker 5>being particularly impressive.

0:10:44.120 --> 0:10:45.520
<v Speaker 6>Can you tell us a little bit about that.

0:10:46.240 --> 0:10:50.280
<v Speaker 1>The Carla Walker case happened years ago in nineteen seventy four,

0:10:50.559 --> 0:10:54.040
<v Speaker 1>and Carla Walker was a seventeen year old girl. She

0:10:54.320 --> 0:10:58.480
<v Speaker 1>was a high school cheerleader, very like spunky, energetic, and

0:10:58.800 --> 0:11:02.960
<v Speaker 1>the night of her Valentine's Day dance, she disappeared. She

0:11:03.000 --> 0:11:06.720
<v Speaker 1>went to the dance with her boyfriend, Rodney, and later

0:11:06.840 --> 0:11:10.760
<v Speaker 1>that night Rodney would later say that they were in

0:11:10.800 --> 0:11:13.440
<v Speaker 1>a bowling alley parking lot after the dance doing you

0:11:13.480 --> 0:11:15.800
<v Speaker 1>know what teenagers do, kind of sitting in their car

0:11:15.880 --> 0:11:18.880
<v Speaker 1>kissing a little bit. Suddenly the door opened and they're

0:11:18.920 --> 0:11:23.560
<v Speaker 1>at gunpoint with either one or two men and Rodney

0:11:23.800 --> 0:11:26.800
<v Speaker 1>he had just been beaten across the face, but when

0:11:26.800 --> 0:11:29.720
<v Speaker 1>he woke up, Carla was gone, and three days later

0:11:29.840 --> 0:11:34.400
<v Speaker 1>they found her body in a cattle culvert just outside

0:11:34.440 --> 0:11:37.880
<v Speaker 1>of the Fort Worth area. Anyway, through all this they

0:11:37.960 --> 0:11:40.800
<v Speaker 1>just don't get enough evidence and the case goes cold

0:11:41.240 --> 0:11:45.000
<v Speaker 1>for years and years and years. I do think it's

0:11:45.040 --> 0:11:49.240
<v Speaker 1>a case that stayed alive in that community, like people

0:11:49.280 --> 0:11:54.360
<v Speaker 1>always wondered what happened to Carla after years and years. Eventually,

0:11:54.440 --> 0:11:58.360
<v Speaker 1>of course, DNA technology comes on the scene and they

0:11:58.400 --> 0:12:03.320
<v Speaker 1>do luckily have some DNA preserved on Carlo's clothing, and

0:12:03.720 --> 0:12:07.520
<v Speaker 1>eventually authroom here is about the case, David and Kristen

0:12:08.440 --> 0:12:11.000
<v Speaker 1>and they get involved and they say, we think we

0:12:11.080 --> 0:12:14.440
<v Speaker 1>can help solve this case. They did find just a

0:12:14.559 --> 0:12:17.880
<v Speaker 1>little bit more DNA on her dress. It was just

0:12:18.679 --> 0:12:23.040
<v Speaker 1>I think it was four nanograms, which is like the tiniest,

0:12:23.280 --> 0:12:26.880
<v Speaker 1>tiniest amount, like just a matter of a handful of cells.

0:12:26.920 --> 0:12:30.720
<v Speaker 1>It was also DNA mixed with other DNA, so again

0:12:30.760 --> 0:12:33.840
<v Speaker 1>it's and it's also degraded. At this point, it's forty

0:12:33.880 --> 0:12:37.400
<v Speaker 1>six years later, so this DNA has also just been

0:12:37.440 --> 0:12:41.280
<v Speaker 1>like sitting around gradually degrading for all those years, but

0:12:41.440 --> 0:12:45.000
<v Speaker 1>AUTHROAM says, we're confident we can get a result. So

0:12:45.400 --> 0:12:49.480
<v Speaker 1>they do the testing, and they get a result, and

0:12:49.840 --> 0:12:53.760
<v Speaker 1>they have a name, Glenn Samuel McCurley junior, and so

0:12:54.840 --> 0:12:57.839
<v Speaker 1>police go and find him. They ask for DNA squad,

0:12:57.840 --> 0:13:01.960
<v Speaker 1>which he eventually does, and they're able to check if he,

0:13:02.200 --> 0:13:05.200
<v Speaker 1>in fact is the person who left this DNA the

0:13:05.280 --> 0:13:08.520
<v Speaker 1>seman on Carlos dress and it is a match. And

0:13:08.960 --> 0:13:13.559
<v Speaker 1>eventually Glenn Samuel L. McCurley Junior confessed, that is.

0:13:13.559 --> 0:13:18.240
<v Speaker 5>Seriously so impressive forty six years later, very degraded DNA,

0:13:18.480 --> 0:13:22.160
<v Speaker 5>only four nanograms of it. AUTHORAM is truly changing the

0:13:22.160 --> 0:13:22.640
<v Speaker 5>world here.

0:13:26.000 --> 0:13:28.080
<v Speaker 4>Let's stop here for a break. We'll be back in

0:13:28.080 --> 0:13:39.360
<v Speaker 4>a moment. When the Idaho State Police Lab couldn't get

0:13:39.360 --> 0:13:41.680
<v Speaker 4>a hit from COTIS on the DNA found on the

0:13:41.720 --> 0:13:45.600
<v Speaker 4>knife sheath, investigators turned to David and Kristen Middleman at

0:13:45.640 --> 0:13:48.520
<v Speaker 4>AUTHRM to see if they could process the sample using

0:13:48.559 --> 0:13:54.319
<v Speaker 4>forensic investigative genetic genealogy, renowned for solving cold cases. This

0:13:54.440 --> 0:13:57.360
<v Speaker 4>marked one of the very first active cases AUTHORM had

0:13:57.400 --> 0:14:02.240
<v Speaker 4>been approached about. Here's journalist Alan Lance Lesser explaining how

0:14:02.280 --> 0:14:04.320
<v Speaker 4>authoram handled this crucial sample.

0:14:07.480 --> 0:14:09.960
<v Speaker 1>I think when they first were asked to come on,

0:14:10.280 --> 0:14:13.040
<v Speaker 1>they were actually a little bit nervous, just because of

0:14:13.080 --> 0:14:16.040
<v Speaker 1>how much attention was focused on it and because they

0:14:16.080 --> 0:14:19.360
<v Speaker 1>typically have done kind of these older cold cases. But

0:14:19.760 --> 0:14:23.360
<v Speaker 1>I think Kristen said when she thought about, we just

0:14:23.400 --> 0:14:26.480
<v Speaker 1>have a duty to try to help. I mean, David

0:14:26.480 --> 0:14:28.960
<v Speaker 1>and Kristen had a child at the time who was

0:14:29.000 --> 0:14:30.840
<v Speaker 1>a sophomore in college, and they were like, what if

0:14:30.840 --> 0:14:33.920
<v Speaker 1>something like this happened to our child, Like, we would

0:14:34.080 --> 0:14:37.280
<v Speaker 1>absolutely want our technology to be used. So despite some

0:14:37.400 --> 0:14:40.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of nerves around that, they jumped right in and

0:14:40.080 --> 0:14:43.760
<v Speaker 1>they were able to get DNA from that sheath right

0:14:43.800 --> 0:14:45.920
<v Speaker 1>at the snap, because you know, when you snap something,

0:14:45.960 --> 0:14:47.920
<v Speaker 1>you like really have to pull at it. Because of that,

0:14:48.000 --> 0:14:50.560
<v Speaker 1>there was actually quite a bit of DNA left behind.

0:14:50.800 --> 0:14:53.320
<v Speaker 1>It was just like touch DNA. It was a very

0:14:53.360 --> 0:14:56.840
<v Speaker 1>clean sample, which was comforting in that it wasn't mixed

0:14:56.880 --> 0:14:59.120
<v Speaker 1>with other DNA and there was like a lot of it.

0:14:59.240 --> 0:15:01.960
<v Speaker 1>So they run the tests, and it takes a little

0:15:01.960 --> 0:15:05.320
<v Speaker 1>while to complete the tests, but initially the information they

0:15:05.320 --> 0:15:08.160
<v Speaker 1>get from some kind of the preliminary testing is some

0:15:08.280 --> 0:15:13.600
<v Speaker 1>basic kind of geographic information about the perpetrator. They find

0:15:13.800 --> 0:15:19.880
<v Speaker 1>that it's someone likely of European heritage, of specifically Italian heritage,

0:15:20.320 --> 0:15:24.280
<v Speaker 1>and that he probably is connected to kind of a

0:15:24.360 --> 0:15:29.160
<v Speaker 1>multi generational family that lives in Pennsylvania. Actually, so they've

0:15:29.160 --> 0:15:32.560
<v Speaker 1>got that kind of information going, which also is connected

0:15:32.560 --> 0:15:35.880
<v Speaker 1>to the fact that the white Hyundai Elantra that's seen

0:15:36.120 --> 0:15:39.800
<v Speaker 1>driving around the crime scene at around the time of

0:15:39.840 --> 0:15:43.040
<v Speaker 1>the murders doesn't have a front license plate, which is

0:15:43.400 --> 0:15:46.120
<v Speaker 1>common in Pennsylvania cars, and.

0:15:46.040 --> 0:15:48.440
<v Speaker 5>That's such an important clue just even being able to

0:15:48.440 --> 0:15:50.600
<v Speaker 5>whittle down the Lantras, you know, it was such a

0:15:50.600 --> 0:15:53.200
<v Speaker 5>popular car. It still is. I think at some point

0:15:53.240 --> 0:15:55.640
<v Speaker 5>I saw it was reported there are approximately twenty two

0:15:55.760 --> 0:15:57.640
<v Speaker 5>thousand white Hondai Launtras.

0:15:57.320 --> 0:15:59.600
<v Speaker 6>In the area. So if you can eliminate the vast.

0:15:59.480 --> 0:16:01.280
<v Speaker 5>Majority of the i but only focus on ones with

0:16:01.360 --> 0:16:03.720
<v Speaker 5>no front license plate, that's extremely helpful.

0:16:06.760 --> 0:16:10.840
<v Speaker 1>That's that other connection there again to other evidence. Anyway, Eventually,

0:16:10.920 --> 0:16:14.160
<v Speaker 1>once the testing is done, they eventually have a name,

0:16:14.440 --> 0:16:18.920
<v Speaker 1>and it's Brian Coburger, and they call up the police

0:16:19.000 --> 0:16:22.080
<v Speaker 1>and give them the name. And at first the police

0:16:22.120 --> 0:16:24.840
<v Speaker 1>were so shocked they were almost thinking it was almost

0:16:24.880 --> 0:16:27.440
<v Speaker 1>a joke. Because they had kept saying, give us a name,

0:16:27.560 --> 0:16:29.720
<v Speaker 1>give us a name, that they almost thought it was

0:16:29.840 --> 0:16:33.440
<v Speaker 1>like so ridiculous to get one specific name, because again,

0:16:33.560 --> 0:16:35.960
<v Speaker 1>I feel like a lot of investigators are used to codis,

0:16:36.040 --> 0:16:37.640
<v Speaker 1>where like, if you don't get a match there, you're

0:16:37.640 --> 0:16:39.960
<v Speaker 1>not going to get a name. So then they really

0:16:40.400 --> 0:16:44.040
<v Speaker 1>let it absorb it and started their investigation and from

0:16:44.080 --> 0:16:47.440
<v Speaker 1>there we're able, you know, to track down Brian Coburger

0:16:47.520 --> 0:16:48.920
<v Speaker 1>and continue it from there.

0:16:51.680 --> 0:16:54.800
<v Speaker 5>And forensic investigative genetic genealogy is just a lead generator.

0:16:54.840 --> 0:16:56.000
<v Speaker 6>It is a means to a lead.

0:16:56.160 --> 0:16:58.440
<v Speaker 5>It does not directly implicate you, which is something the

0:16:58.440 --> 0:17:00.920
<v Speaker 5>prosecution was really trying to hoe in on last winter

0:17:01.160 --> 0:17:03.000
<v Speaker 5>when the defense was trying to get the DNA evans

0:17:03.000 --> 0:17:04.720
<v Speaker 5>thrown out. You know, they were saying it violet at

0:17:04.760 --> 0:17:07.960
<v Speaker 5>privacy laws, that it wasn't effective and in theory, you know,

0:17:08.040 --> 0:17:09.879
<v Speaker 5>I guess it's kind of scary to think that if

0:17:09.920 --> 0:17:12.159
<v Speaker 5>you have a relative that uploads their DNA to a

0:17:12.200 --> 0:17:14.919
<v Speaker 5>heritage site, and let's say your DNA is at a

0:17:14.960 --> 0:17:17.120
<v Speaker 5>crime scene, you know, all of a sudden, your relative

0:17:17.200 --> 0:17:19.399
<v Speaker 5>has implicated you in a crime, and you know, that

0:17:19.840 --> 0:17:20.719
<v Speaker 5>is kind of a scary thing.

0:17:20.720 --> 0:17:21.240
<v Speaker 6>To think about.

0:17:21.800 --> 0:17:24.000
<v Speaker 1>I do think it's interesting how that I think is

0:17:24.040 --> 0:17:26.320
<v Speaker 1>the first thought a lot of people have is it's

0:17:26.400 --> 0:17:29.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of scary, like almost fearing like, well, I be

0:17:29.560 --> 0:17:32.359
<v Speaker 1>caught for something. But I think it's like a comforting

0:17:32.480 --> 0:17:36.000
<v Speaker 1>reminder to note, like that you're not committing these crimes,

0:17:36.040 --> 0:17:37.520
<v Speaker 1>so you know what I mean, Like I almost want

0:17:37.560 --> 0:17:40.080
<v Speaker 1>to say that to listeners sometimes because it's kind of

0:17:40.119 --> 0:17:42.119
<v Speaker 1>like this new technology, it feels kind of scary, like

0:17:42.160 --> 0:17:44.639
<v Speaker 1>anyone can be identified, but it's it's kind of like

0:17:44.720 --> 0:17:47.400
<v Speaker 1>any other piece of evidence. If someone leaves a piece

0:17:47.440 --> 0:17:50.920
<v Speaker 1>of evidence at a crime scene and they've like murdered someone, yeah,

0:17:50.920 --> 0:17:53.320
<v Speaker 1>I would hope that they can use the evidence that's

0:17:53.359 --> 0:17:55.600
<v Speaker 1>there to find out who did it and to stop

0:17:55.640 --> 0:17:59.200
<v Speaker 1>them from continuing. So it's funny how we're so immediately

0:17:59.240 --> 0:18:02.240
<v Speaker 1>protective of our own DNA, which I think is totally

0:18:02.359 --> 0:18:05.359
<v Speaker 1>valid and correct, but I think the way it's being

0:18:05.480 --> 0:18:10.000
<v Speaker 1>used is still fairly private, and we're finding killers here.

0:18:12.119 --> 0:18:14.520
<v Speaker 5>One hundred percent, and for a FIG match to even matter,

0:18:14.560 --> 0:18:16.880
<v Speaker 5>you have to have some other implicated evidence to even

0:18:16.880 --> 0:18:19.159
<v Speaker 5>get a warrant. In the Coburger case, you know he

0:18:19.240 --> 0:18:22.080
<v Speaker 5>had the white HOUNDAI lantra. He matched the physical description

0:18:22.119 --> 0:18:24.680
<v Speaker 5>of the perpetrator that Dylan Morton's had describes scene in

0:18:24.680 --> 0:18:26.359
<v Speaker 5>the night of the murders. You now, there's just a

0:18:26.400 --> 0:18:28.560
<v Speaker 5>lot of different things that are piling up against him.

0:18:28.920 --> 0:18:30.920
<v Speaker 5>And on top of having other evidence that links you

0:18:31.000 --> 0:18:33.639
<v Speaker 5>to the crime, investigators also have to confirm a fig

0:18:33.680 --> 0:18:37.720
<v Speaker 5>match with traditionals STR DNA testing STR is the old

0:18:37.760 --> 0:18:40.919
<v Speaker 5>gold standard trod and true for matches, whereas forendsic investigative

0:18:40.920 --> 0:18:42.680
<v Speaker 5>genetic genealogy, it's newer.

0:18:44.600 --> 0:18:44.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:18:45.000 --> 0:18:48.560
<v Speaker 1>Well, first, Brian Coberger had gone to his family's home

0:18:48.960 --> 0:18:52.520
<v Speaker 1>in Pennsylvania, so they got some DNA from the garbage,

0:18:52.720 --> 0:18:56.919
<v Speaker 1>which they had also seen Brian Coburger using gloves to

0:18:57.040 --> 0:18:59.960
<v Speaker 1>take out garbage, which to me suggests he was being fair,

0:19:00.040 --> 0:19:03.439
<v Speaker 1>very careful about DNA. He had actually studied criminology. He

0:19:03.880 --> 0:19:06.120
<v Speaker 1>really knew what he was doing. He was really covering

0:19:06.160 --> 0:19:09.560
<v Speaker 1>his tracks. But they were able to test DNA and

0:19:09.720 --> 0:19:11.960
<v Speaker 1>it was his father's DNA because he was at the

0:19:11.960 --> 0:19:14.080
<v Speaker 1>family's house. But then from there they were able to say,

0:19:14.080 --> 0:19:16.520
<v Speaker 1>it's this close of a match, let's get a warrant

0:19:16.600 --> 0:19:20.240
<v Speaker 1>to get Brian's DNA, and they were able to then

0:19:20.640 --> 0:19:24.000
<v Speaker 1>match it up using the traditional str testing.

0:19:24.240 --> 0:19:26.080
<v Speaker 5>Right, which directly matched him to the DNA in the

0:19:26.119 --> 0:19:29.199
<v Speaker 5>knife sheath. Authoram's work is so impressive here because they

0:19:29.280 --> 0:19:32.320
<v Speaker 5>truly helped defind Brian Coberger quickly. Now he wasn't in

0:19:32.440 --> 0:19:34.560
<v Speaker 5>codis So imagine if the sample from the NiFe sheet

0:19:34.600 --> 0:19:37.679
<v Speaker 5>didn't get sent in for forensic investigative genetic genealogy. I

0:19:37.720 --> 0:19:39.639
<v Speaker 5>think about that often, you know, I'm glad that the

0:19:39.720 --> 0:19:42.080
<v Speaker 5>signs is improving so much that we can catch people

0:19:42.119 --> 0:19:43.359
<v Speaker 5>faster and get them off the street.

0:19:47.560 --> 0:19:49.879
<v Speaker 4>Many have wondered what would have happened in the Brian

0:19:49.920 --> 0:19:53.439
<v Speaker 4>Coburger case if the single source male DNA found on

0:19:53.480 --> 0:20:00.520
<v Speaker 4>the knife sheath was never identified, especially since Coburger the

0:20:00.600 --> 0:20:05.160
<v Speaker 4>CODA system. We ask legal analyst and former homicide prosecutor

0:20:05.320 --> 0:20:08.400
<v Speaker 4>Jarrett Farentino for his thoughts on how this case could

0:20:08.440 --> 0:20:12.480
<v Speaker 4>have played out without Authorm's assistance. He's joined by KAT

0:20:12.640 --> 0:20:14.840
<v Speaker 4>Studio's producer Alison Bankston.

0:20:17.240 --> 0:20:21.640
<v Speaker 3>I mean, what can you say the technology that Authrum utilized,

0:20:22.000 --> 0:20:25.399
<v Speaker 3>the IgG technology in this case took it to a

0:20:25.400 --> 0:20:29.360
<v Speaker 3>whole other level. We don't know that Brian Colberger would

0:20:29.400 --> 0:20:33.240
<v Speaker 3>have ever been ultimately charged, or that investigators would have

0:20:33.280 --> 0:20:37.400
<v Speaker 3>gotten sufficient probable cause to discover all of the evidence

0:20:37.720 --> 0:20:40.960
<v Speaker 3>that eventually was found against him. We do know that

0:20:41.119 --> 0:20:47.560
<v Speaker 3>IgG technology expedited identifying Brian Coolberger as the likely killer here.

0:20:47.800 --> 0:20:52.520
<v Speaker 3>It expedited the probable cause determinations and took him into

0:20:52.560 --> 0:20:56.320
<v Speaker 3>custody before he can hurt someone else. And it's him

0:20:56.640 --> 0:21:00.320
<v Speaker 3>one in quintillion chance. This guy with his DNA is

0:21:00.400 --> 0:21:04.040
<v Speaker 3>also driving a white HONDAEI Landra, his cell phone's hitting

0:21:04.080 --> 0:21:08.239
<v Speaker 3>on those towers, he matches the physical description. All of

0:21:08.280 --> 0:21:12.320
<v Speaker 3>those things just came to pass tremendously as the case

0:21:12.440 --> 0:21:15.960
<v Speaker 3>was put together. If you don't have the DNA, can

0:21:16.040 --> 0:21:19.560
<v Speaker 3>you get there? Remember they weren't just challenging the DNA.

0:21:19.760 --> 0:21:22.400
<v Speaker 3>They were saying, number one, it was touched DNA. There's

0:21:22.440 --> 0:21:25.919
<v Speaker 3>an issue with that, but really it was IgG DNA.

0:21:26.160 --> 0:21:30.760
<v Speaker 3>It was a process employed. It's a novel process. It's

0:21:30.840 --> 0:21:34.200
<v Speaker 3>not enough to get to probable cause. And if it isn't,

0:21:34.359 --> 0:21:38.679
<v Speaker 3>what do you got. You have a largely circumstantial case

0:21:38.720 --> 0:21:40.000
<v Speaker 3>against Brian Colberger.

0:21:46.080 --> 0:21:48.359
<v Speaker 5>Without the DNA, is there more of a chance for

0:21:48.440 --> 0:21:50.520
<v Speaker 5>reasonable doubts? Like let's say you're on the jury or

0:21:50.560 --> 0:21:52.240
<v Speaker 5>going through trial. I feel like it probably would have

0:21:52.240 --> 0:21:53.840
<v Speaker 5>been less of a slam dunk, But how much less

0:21:53.840 --> 0:21:56.080
<v Speaker 5>of a slam dunk could have done if the DNA

0:21:56.200 --> 0:21:56.600
<v Speaker 5>wasn't here.

0:21:57.280 --> 0:21:59.439
<v Speaker 3>If it all got in front of a jury, your

0:21:59.560 --> 0:22:03.159
<v Speaker 3>job at that point is to explain the circumstance away,

0:22:03.359 --> 0:22:05.879
<v Speaker 3>and it's much easier if there's not a one and

0:22:06.000 --> 0:22:09.920
<v Speaker 3>quintillion chance it's not your guy. You know, you could say, hey,

0:22:10.040 --> 0:22:12.800
<v Speaker 3>a lot of phones were in that tower, hundreds of phones,

0:22:12.840 --> 0:22:15.440
<v Speaker 3>if not thousands, over those days, and a lot of

0:22:15.480 --> 0:22:18.600
<v Speaker 3>people drive a white Hondai Lauantra. You don't have DNA.

0:22:18.920 --> 0:22:24.680
<v Speaker 3>Brian never confessed there's no blood in his car. I've

0:22:24.720 --> 0:22:30.159
<v Speaker 3>prosecuted a lot of solely circumstantial cases. I've secured convictions

0:22:30.160 --> 0:22:33.320
<v Speaker 3>on those cases. They're tougher, don't get me wrong, But

0:22:33.440 --> 0:22:37.199
<v Speaker 3>I think you could have still prosecuted Brian Colberger for

0:22:37.280 --> 0:22:41.280
<v Speaker 3>this crime, but it would have been a very different process.

0:22:44.880 --> 0:22:46.560
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I feel like as a juror, and this is

0:22:46.560 --> 0:22:48.919
<v Speaker 5>solely my opinion. I am definitely not an expert, but

0:22:48.960 --> 0:22:51.400
<v Speaker 5>those points about the Launtra being such a popular car,

0:22:51.760 --> 0:22:53.399
<v Speaker 5>that a cell phone was in the area, that he

0:22:53.480 --> 0:22:56.280
<v Speaker 5>matches the description for me with the right experts up

0:22:56.280 --> 0:22:58.639
<v Speaker 5>on the stand. All of that could have pretty easily

0:22:58.680 --> 0:23:02.400
<v Speaker 5>been explained away, Like it's possible that without the DNA evidence,

0:23:02.480 --> 0:23:05.080
<v Speaker 5>he would have gotten off or maybe never even gotten caught.

0:23:05.720 --> 0:23:10.600
<v Speaker 3>And ultimately, remember it was the DNA that decision, the

0:23:10.600 --> 0:23:13.479
<v Speaker 3>decision that it was coming in that led to the plague.

0:23:13.760 --> 0:23:19.199
<v Speaker 3>So you cannot overstate the significance of Authorum's findings in

0:23:19.280 --> 0:23:21.480
<v Speaker 3>this case. There's no doubt about it.

0:23:21.800 --> 0:23:24.520
<v Speaker 5>This was authram's first live case, you know, active case

0:23:24.560 --> 0:23:27.880
<v Speaker 5>for the used forensic investigative genealogy. Do you think courtrooms

0:23:27.920 --> 0:23:30.080
<v Speaker 5>will start seeing more of this since you know there

0:23:30.119 --> 0:23:31.560
<v Speaker 5>was success in the Coburger case.

0:23:32.160 --> 0:23:35.680
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely so. When you have a case of this magnitude

0:23:35.800 --> 0:23:40.800
<v Speaker 3>covered worldwide and a technology stands the rigors of the

0:23:40.920 --> 0:23:44.520
<v Speaker 3>challenges that it was met with in Idaho by Coburger's

0:23:44.560 --> 0:23:48.480
<v Speaker 3>defense team, it is a green light to prosecutors across

0:23:48.520 --> 0:23:52.639
<v Speaker 3>the country. The law is based on other cases and

0:23:52.720 --> 0:23:56.239
<v Speaker 3>the ability to argue it. Once that first impression is

0:23:56.320 --> 0:23:59.359
<v Speaker 3>made and the decision is made, that case will be

0:23:59.480 --> 0:24:03.560
<v Speaker 3>utilized across the country, maybe the world to argue IgG

0:24:03.760 --> 0:24:08.199
<v Speaker 3>technology is sound and it stands the tests that are

0:24:08.240 --> 0:24:10.920
<v Speaker 3>applied in corporate so yes, I think it will have

0:24:11.440 --> 0:24:16.040
<v Speaker 3>a very, very big impact on convictions solving investigations. But

0:24:16.119 --> 0:24:18.640
<v Speaker 3>at the same time, I think it's worth noting this

0:24:18.760 --> 0:24:21.800
<v Speaker 3>type of technology has also led to the solving of

0:24:21.920 --> 0:24:26.439
<v Speaker 3>cold cases. It's also led to the exoneration of people

0:24:26.480 --> 0:24:29.840
<v Speaker 3>that have been wrongfully convicted. So it is a powerful

0:24:29.920 --> 0:24:32.680
<v Speaker 3>tool to getting to the truth, whatever that is.

0:24:36.440 --> 0:24:38.520
<v Speaker 4>Let's stop here for a break. We'll be back in

0:24:38.520 --> 0:24:51.480
<v Speaker 4>a moment. Authroom Laboratories in the Woodlands, Texas, is revolutionizing

0:24:51.560 --> 0:24:55.160
<v Speaker 4>how DNA evidence is used in courtrooms. What once began

0:24:55.240 --> 0:24:58.760
<v Speaker 4>as a tool for genealogists tracing family heritage is now

0:24:58.760 --> 0:25:02.320
<v Speaker 4>helping law enforcement a identify criminals with no prior records

0:25:02.800 --> 0:25:08.520
<v Speaker 4>like never before. Without Authram, Justice for Madison, Mogen Kallie Gonzalvez,

0:25:08.840 --> 0:25:13.240
<v Speaker 4>Xana Kernodle, and Ethan Shapin may have never come. It's

0:25:13.280 --> 0:25:17.240
<v Speaker 4>a groundbreaking company that we're proud to feature. Joining us

0:25:17.280 --> 0:25:21.240
<v Speaker 4>once again is journalist, authoram Insider and host of America's

0:25:21.240 --> 0:25:25.600
<v Speaker 4>Crime Lab, Alan Lance Lesser, along with Katie's Studio's producer

0:25:25.920 --> 0:25:26.880
<v Speaker 4>Alison Bankston.

0:25:28.600 --> 0:25:31.080
<v Speaker 1>What's kind of cool to think about, but someone like

0:25:31.119 --> 0:25:36.000
<v Speaker 1>Brian Coberger, who had again studied criminology, had even surveyed

0:25:36.320 --> 0:25:40.400
<v Speaker 1>criminals about how they committed their crimes, presumably to get

0:25:40.440 --> 0:25:43.840
<v Speaker 1>information for how to commit a crime successfully. For him,

0:25:44.160 --> 0:25:46.680
<v Speaker 1>at least, that's what where my mind goes that why

0:25:46.720 --> 0:25:49.480
<v Speaker 1>he was doing that. And to think he was so careful,

0:25:49.520 --> 0:25:52.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he really didn't leave other evidence at the

0:25:52.320 --> 0:25:55.000
<v Speaker 1>crime scene. It really was this knife sheath. And to

0:25:55.080 --> 0:25:58.520
<v Speaker 1>think he was so careful and knowledgeable and yet he

0:25:58.800 --> 0:26:01.879
<v Speaker 1>still did lead DNA. I almost feel like it's a

0:26:01.880 --> 0:26:05.560
<v Speaker 1>psa to anyone considering committing a violent crime like in

0:26:05.600 --> 0:26:08.200
<v Speaker 1>today's world, You're not going to get away with it.

0:26:08.960 --> 0:26:10.560
<v Speaker 6>No, you're not not, even if you don't have a

0:26:10.600 --> 0:26:11.320
<v Speaker 6>criminal record.

0:26:12.000 --> 0:26:15.240
<v Speaker 1>And that's a comforting thing, a good message for people

0:26:15.280 --> 0:26:18.639
<v Speaker 1>to know that even just having society know that it

0:26:18.720 --> 0:26:21.560
<v Speaker 1>might reduce the amount of crimes like this.

0:26:22.440 --> 0:26:25.360
<v Speaker 5>Throughout working on this then this podcast with off from

0:26:25.480 --> 0:26:27.960
<v Speaker 5>you know, you kind of have a really cool in

0:26:28.160 --> 0:26:30.040
<v Speaker 5>here with this most amazing company.

0:26:30.119 --> 0:26:32.360
<v Speaker 6>What have you personally learned working so.

0:26:32.400 --> 0:26:35.480
<v Speaker 5>Closely with them and establishing this relationship with them.

0:26:35.920 --> 0:26:39.480
<v Speaker 1>I've just learned so much more about the technology. And

0:26:39.560 --> 0:26:42.560
<v Speaker 1>also if people listen to our podcast America's Crime Lab,

0:26:42.800 --> 0:26:45.760
<v Speaker 1>they will learn a lot more too, but also in

0:26:45.760 --> 0:26:49.400
<v Speaker 1>an engaging way, learning about these cases and these stories

0:26:49.440 --> 0:26:52.560
<v Speaker 1>and these people, and also being victim centered in that

0:26:52.600 --> 0:26:55.400
<v Speaker 1>we talk to a lot of family members and relatives,

0:26:55.680 --> 0:27:00.160
<v Speaker 1>close friends. And I think it's useful as I consume

0:27:00.280 --> 0:27:03.439
<v Speaker 1>true crime media or you know, learn about cases in

0:27:03.440 --> 0:27:06.080
<v Speaker 1>my environment to understand some of this technology and how

0:27:06.200 --> 0:27:08.199
<v Speaker 1>can be used. And I think I've just been so

0:27:08.320 --> 0:27:11.439
<v Speaker 1>struck by their process and it's kind of almost like

0:27:11.520 --> 0:27:14.200
<v Speaker 1>given me hope in science, and I personally have been

0:27:14.280 --> 0:27:18.320
<v Speaker 1>inspired by also their devotion to the work and how

0:27:18.560 --> 0:27:21.199
<v Speaker 1>so many people at AUTHRAM do have some kind of

0:27:21.240 --> 0:27:24.840
<v Speaker 1>personal connection, maybe they had a family member who experienced

0:27:24.840 --> 0:27:28.000
<v Speaker 1>a violet crime or just have some kind of personal

0:27:28.040 --> 0:27:30.480
<v Speaker 1>stake in these crimes. So I also think authrom is

0:27:30.600 --> 0:27:34.879
<v Speaker 1>just full of people who are very committed to this mission. Really,

0:27:35.119 --> 0:27:38.439
<v Speaker 1>I feel like our podcast focuses on so many dark things,

0:27:38.480 --> 0:27:41.119
<v Speaker 1>as I'm sure you're used to as well, But I

0:27:41.160 --> 0:27:44.480
<v Speaker 1>think sometimes in that darkness you see these stories of

0:27:44.560 --> 0:27:47.760
<v Speaker 1>human resilience, of people working for cases of people they

0:27:47.760 --> 0:27:50.160
<v Speaker 1>don't even know, and being so determined, And I think

0:27:50.200 --> 0:27:53.240
<v Speaker 1>that is also very uplifting to me on a personal level.

0:27:53.240 --> 0:27:54.119
<v Speaker 1>Working on this show.

0:27:54.800 --> 0:27:57.280
<v Speaker 5>What else can we expect from America's Crime Lab in

0:27:57.280 --> 0:27:59.040
<v Speaker 5>the future, What can we look forward to as you

0:27:59.080 --> 0:28:00.640
<v Speaker 5>guys continue to make podcast.

0:28:01.440 --> 0:28:05.280
<v Speaker 1>Well, we're still coming out with episodes, so they're coming

0:28:05.320 --> 0:28:07.800
<v Speaker 1>out every week. But we're just excited to be getting

0:28:07.800 --> 0:28:10.760
<v Speaker 1>these stories out there and to be able to have

0:28:10.840 --> 0:28:13.919
<v Speaker 1>this unique relationship with Authorm where we're really getting the

0:28:13.960 --> 0:28:16.560
<v Speaker 1>insider view of like how does the lab work, how

0:28:16.600 --> 0:28:19.120
<v Speaker 1>do they work these cases? And basically it's a look

0:28:19.160 --> 0:28:22.560
<v Speaker 1>into authoram in a way that I think hasn't really

0:28:22.640 --> 0:28:25.680
<v Speaker 1>happened before, and it's really exciting stuff.

0:28:28.200 --> 0:28:31.480
<v Speaker 4>You can find Dalen's podcast, American Crime Lab on the

0:28:31.520 --> 0:28:35.440
<v Speaker 4>iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts,

0:28:36.520 --> 0:28:39.520
<v Speaker 4>and you can learn more about authorm's impressive work at

0:28:39.560 --> 0:28:47.920
<v Speaker 4>authrum dot com. That's ot h r AM dot com.

0:28:47.920 --> 0:28:52.040
<v Speaker 4>More on that next time. For more information on the

0:28:52.080 --> 0:28:55.600
<v Speaker 4>case and relevant photos, follow us on Instagram at kt

0:28:55.960 --> 0:29:00.560
<v Speaker 4>Underscore Studios. The Idaho Massacre is produced by Stephanie Leideger,

0:29:01.000 --> 0:29:06.800
<v Speaker 4>Alison Bankston, Gabriel Castillo, and me Courtney Armstrong. Editing and

0:29:06.840 --> 0:29:11.320
<v Speaker 4>sound design by Jeff Toois, Music by Jared Aston. The

0:29:11.360 --> 0:29:14.720
<v Speaker 4>Idaho Masacre is a production of Katie's Studios and iHeartRadio.

0:29:15.320 --> 0:29:19.800
<v Speaker 4>For more podcasts like this, visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts,

0:29:20.080 --> 0:29:24.400
<v Speaker 4>or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.